All Episodes Plain Text
Nov. 13, 2020 - Dark Journalist
03:49:56
Dark Journalist - Catherine Austin Fitts Exclusive Interview: Humanity In The Balance!

Catherine Austin Fitts exposes alleged election fraud via Dominion software and claims the Biden administration engineered pandemic dependency to destroy Main Street while building private prison "slave labor camps." She argues secret accounting under FASB 56 funneled trillions into underground bases and private equity, paving the way for a central bank digital currency that could enable population culling. Fitts details how engineered crises like Ebola served political goals, warns against transhumanist agendas involving nanoparticles, and asserts JFK was assassinated to protect the UFO file from a leader who might "give away the empire." Ultimately, she urges listeners to master local finances, reject hopelessness as an opiate, and overcome social stigma to confront mind control technologies and the reality of humanity's separation from its leadership. [Automatically generated summary]

Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo

Time Text
Global Reset Regime Explained 00:14:48
And we are live.
This is Dark Journalist.
This is a very special live stream.
And as you can see, I'm joined by the former assistant HUD secretary, Catherine Austin Fitz.
How are you, Catherine?
Fine.
Now, can I see everybody as they come in?
The chat is up.
And you should.
I'm not logged in.
Does that mean I can't see it?
You know what?
If you want.
Oh, no, no, no, no.
Now I see it.
Oh, yes, yes.
So we're going to be taking some live questions here.
We're going to get into a few subjects.
Obviously, we're in the middle of this tug of war with the election 2020 and the strange staged results.
And these are things that have been happening, which, you know, when it started to happen, it was interesting because it happened so quickly.
And, you know, we have Dominion software involved.
We have all of these strange results changing in the blink of an eye.
What was your first reaction after election night?
What was going through your mind?
I was surprised because I expected.
The popular vote to go with Trump, but then the monkey business to throw it either way.
Yes.
And I was surprised to see what it looked like to me was Trump had done better than even I expected.
Yes.
And what that helped me to realize if it wasn't for COVID 19, you know, they were staring down a massive Republican landslide.
Right.
And in retrospect, you see why they pressed so hard to shut down the independent producers because they got Trump.
To do two things.
They got Trump to basically destroy the businesses of a huge number of his own supporters.
Yes.
It's quite remarkable that they boxed him into doing that.
And then they got him to basically give the pharmaceutical industry $10 billion to promote vaccines.
And both of those things really hurt him in his base.
And yet he still did, you know, it's a credit to how afraid everybody was of Biden.
He could still get as much support as he did.
No question about it.
Right.
Those were key moves, having him go along with the lockdown in that period during the spring into the summer.
That really destroyed a Main Street economy.
Right.
Not destroyed, but it did terrible, terrible harm.
Yes.
Remember, because, and the reason you have to understand that is if Biden gets the White House, let alone the Democrats get the Senate, Biden intends to destroy the rest of that economy.
Yeah.
Right.
So, so they want that's the point of the stimulus package.
They want everyone literally dependent on the federal dole and happy to not have to work.
So, even if a small business person wants to keep their small business going in Kenan, all their potential employees are going to be off smoking weed.
Right.
You know, on their federal check.
Right.
It's going to be, you're going to have to, you're going to have to be able to run your small business by yourself or with, Robotics, AI and software and robotics.
Why is, you know, with the Biden forces that they're trying to roll in here, why is that Biden group wanting to push this kind of COVID cult, COVID economy?
Where are they coming from to bring on the transhumanism and the UBI, the universal basic?
So here's the mystery, and I've never known the answer.
My first encounter with Biden was when he was a senator.
And if you read the Dylan Reed and Aristocracy of Stock Profits book that's online.
Yes.
He was the one who engineered the passage of the omnibus bill with the Clinton White House.
And that started the private prison industry and the enormous roundup of both innocent or entrapped people in America.
And created, I don't call them private prison, I call them slave labor camps.
So that was Biden.
And that was done with a real estate play that was deeply, deeply bipartisan.
Okay.
Now, if you look at what they were doing, I was literally saying to everyone I knew, including on Wall Street, if we do this, this is genocide.
This is slave labor camps.
This is really totalitarian stuff.
And we're talking about keeping a negative, instead of, we have an economy that has a negative return on investment.
Unless we turn that to positive return on investment, The parasite is going to keep eating its way through.
And if we let them do this to poor people, it's only a matter of time until they do it to us.
Yes.
Because the parasite has to keep eating.
It has to keep feeding.
And so you're going to work your way through poor people, but then you're going to work your way through the middle class.
It's coming for all of us.
You can't let this machine grow.
And Biden was somebody who was very instrumental.
Now, my number one question at the time, I wrote an article called William Diefender for.
And the economic hitman of student loans, because one of my former board members was instrumental in stripping away the consumer protections of and re engineering the student loan model so you could make more money from kids defaulting and failing than from them paying back their loans.
So they engineered the failure of successive generations.
And what I had to say to somebody like Biden or Bill Diefenderfer.
Is why would you make money destroying the very system that gave you a leg up and gave you a chance and gave you a future?
Why would you destroy our future by engineering the next generations to fail?
Why would you destroy the American dream by rounding up innocent kids in poor neighborhoods and stuffing them into private prison camps where they can work for corporations for 10 cents on the dollar, 10 cents an hour?
You know, why would you do that?
I don't know why they would do that.
I don't know.
I can't, you know, I left Washington because I couldn't fathom.
You know, I had a Rolodex of 5,000 prominent people.
I couldn't understand why all 5,000 of them would rather do that than turn from a negative return on investment economy to a positive.
I don't know.
For some reason, they felt, you know, a radically centralized empire was the way to go.
And successively, they've shrunk the pie by doing that.
Right.
Which is also a backwards kind of logic.
You become more and more, as you centralize, you become more and more dependent on organized crime and war.
That's where the corruption comes from.
It's a financial addiction.
And the most important thing that you've really explored on dark journalists is they have become phenomenally dependent and addicted to secrecy.
And the more secrecy you have, the more secrecy you need, and it gets worse and worse and worse.
And if you look at the secrecy they've instituted since FASB 56 in 2018, so we had Harvard go dark, and then we had the federal government go dark, and then we had the securities market go dark.
And now the federal government is running all its contracts through corporate subcontractors.
So, Operation Work Speed, all the pharmaceutical contracts are dark.
Everything's a secret.
And the problem is it's become like a roach motel.
It's so secret.
You know, that there's not enough oxygen or light in the thing for people to be productive.
It's a phenomenally wasteful, unproductive system.
You recently just posted this new article from Professor Mark Skidmore, who you've worked before exposing these missing trillions.
But it has a lot about this FASB, and that's F A S A B 56, that statement, and how that takes the whole government dark.
What was new in there?
We did a series at Solari.
If you go to missingmoney.solari.com, you can find our series of seven articles that basically explain how the federal credit mechanism works, both the Federal Reserve and the Treasury.
And in the Treasury, there are six articles on Treasury.
One is on FASB 56, one is on the classification sort of rules, and another on the black budget.
So, how they take all this money secret.
But one of the things Dr. Skidmore focuses on in 2006, the president delegated waiver authority to the National Intelligence Director.
To allow them to waive SEC rules for private companies.
And what Dr. Skidmore is saying is FASB 56 allows them to keep secret government books and spend money secretly on who knows what, because it's all secret.
And when you marry that with private corporations being allowed to do highly classified tasks and you waive their SEC provisions, well, you know, it's like a giant pumping mechanism into the stock market.
Right.
And now you have all these companies gorging on secret money for secret armies that's all secret.
And they can pretend that they're in compliance with SEC disclosures.
But if they all have waivers, then if you're a securities investor, their financial statements are as meaningless as the US government.
They have no meaning.
None.
Wow.
Right.
And of course, the question globally is why does the US stock market, why is the US stock market Able to levitate above Europe and Asia and constantly outperform, read Dr. Skidmore's article.
You'll start to get a sense.
I wrote with my attorney something called Caveat Emter on doing due diligence on Treasury securities.
But if you have any professional responsibility for investment, you need to go to missingmoney.salari.com and read Dr. Skidmore's new piece and read Caveat Emter.
You really need to understand this to do.
I'm looking at the Solari Report missing money volume.
So we have volume one and volume two.
We finally got really nervous because of the censorship.
And I said, we're going to take all of this information, the documentation and our analysis, and we're going to take everything we've done, put it into two volumes that a professional investor needs to do serious due diligence on what's going on, and get it out there in hard copy.
Just get it out there in hard copy because who knows?
I don't trust the internet to preserve this information.
Absolutely.
That's one of them right there.
So there are two volumes, and we've been shipping them out all over the world.
Fantastic.
I dare say there's a sovereign wealth fund.
There's not a sovereign wealth fund in the world that doesn't know what's going on.
You've exposed it in there.
One of the things about the new reports, about the new Solari reports on the state of our currencies, is this gets into the whole global reset and what I'm calling the reset regime that they're rolling in.
And you are really saying this is what they're shooting for going forward, 2021 and beyond.
What is that?
So, what they're doing is they're trying to keep.
The dollar system going.
So the COVID 19 op is a way of keeping the dollar system going.
But then they're trying to accelerate bringing in a new all digital system.
And they, I believe, don't have a clear picture of exactly how they're going to implement it.
So they're prototyping, they're trying lots of different kinds of stuff.
And we explain that in the state of our currencies.
But the financial transaction they're talking about bringing in is a total central control.
So this is the end of currencies.
The subtitle on the State of our currencies is the end of currencies.
Because now we're talking, you know, and I described Karsten's general manager of the BIS saying this the other day in a forum when he was talking about the fact well, you know, the central banks will be able to stop a non citizen from transacting in their central bank crypto.
And of course, the implied fact is they can stop anybody from transacting in their central bank crypto.
And so, what we're talking about is a financial transaction system where you can have a direct or one degree of separation for tech support, direct relationship with the central bank that's printing the money, and they can turn your money on and off.
Amazing.
Right.
Wow, incredible.
And this gets into what you're referring to there.
It better be good.
And this gets into those independent producers because, again, so much of this you said.
They're carving out Main Street.
That's what a lot of the COVID economy is about and the riots and stuff.
Getting rid of those businesses and moving in this new infrastructure and the new smart cities to take over.
So let's break that down.
The first thing, what they're trying to do is institute central control.
And the things standing in their way are constitution and laws around the world that are supported by people who are economically independent.
Right.
Okay.
So whether it's their business or their church or their farm or their not for profit, they have an economically sustainable operation.
And that economically sustainable operation supports their commitment to the Constitution.
And they tend to vote for candidates like Donald Trump.
Financial Coup D'etat Unveiled 00:15:48
You know, if they can't fix the system, then they'll say F you to the system.
Right.
Right.
So, the centralizers have significantly centralized control since 1980, and they've reached the point where they can't envision a way of getting along with the independent producers, so they want to shut them down because they're ready to move to the next phase of central control.
And if they can get them financially dependent on the money they print, then they've got them in a corner, and then they can inject their operating system into them.
And basically get them to use much less resources.
So, there are real environmental issues about, you know, sort of how are we going to use the resources on planet Earth.
And if they can either cull the population or significantly reduce their resource use or both, you know, then they have a way of managing the resource use to their advantage.
Right.
So, they want to be in that central control position where you have to come to them for everything.
And so, even the systems that they're creating with these bailouts, like they've done all these stimulus bills.
When they're coming in and they're showing, you know, oh, we're giving people unemployment, that's like an early snapshot, an early version of the UBI idea, which is to get people out of the idea of producing and just to make them sort of cogs in this production scheme.
Well, think of this as risk management.
So, you know, for quite a while now, we've had an official reality and a reality, and they're getting further and further apart.
Right.
And the population is growing, growing, growing, and now we have Asia rising, and so.
Demanding more resources as their per capita income floats up.
And if you look at trying to keep, you know, it's like Disney World, you have an underground and you have an overground, and they're having a harder and harder time underground and keeping this wonderful Disney World going.
Right.
Right.
So, one of the ways they kept it going was essentially the China trade by bringing China in and using China to produce massive amounts of low cost consumer goods.
They sort of kept the false prosperity going.
But if you look at the difficulties they're having keeping this system going, it's reached a very painful point.
It has to be changed.
Okay.
And in the meantime, the Anglo American Alliance, which has run the reserve currency, has used that reserve currency to assert global control.
And you have many of the parts of the world that are growing very.
You know, more quickly than the mature economies really chomping at the bit to get out of the system.
And there's tremendous tension between the dollar reserve syndicate and the folks who, you know, so the dollar reserve syndicate wants to use the dollar to control.
And meantime, all these other people are trying to use the dollar to trade, and it's not working because it's being used for control.
And so you have real tensions between those groups.
And then you have the tension of becoming a multi planetary civilization.
If you're going to become a multi planetary civilization, then you need a global, the equivalent of a global central bank or center point to interact off planet.
And the current system isn't working.
That's part of the pressure for a global government or a global central bank.
So if you look at the crypto system that is being developed as we speak, the BIS and the Swiss National Bank are playing a very powerful and important role.
And that's because there is this desire for a central point that ultimately can relate off planet.
Right, right.
And this gets into China also, who's making a lot of moves in space.
I want to ask this about China and part of this with the Trump administration.
You know, we just are coming into this contested election and all the controversy there and all the vote fraud.
How much of a piece of that is that Trump was interrupting Chinese control over trade, over the economy, over these things?
How much of a factor was that in terms of?
Trump's approach, China wise, was totally different than, say, Obama's.
So I think China was very important in the mix.
But I think the tension was not between Trump and China.
Certainly there was plenty of tension there.
The tension was between Trump and the people in the West who have financed and supported China.
Right.
So if you look, I go back to the globalists and Mr. Global.
They have global goals, and everybody sort of pulling back into their own nation and trying to become more competitive and successful within their own nation is contradictory to where their investments and returns flow.
I see.
So, part of it is we're back to if we're going to become a multi planetary civilization, then how are we going to have a central point?
Whether government or central bank that can interact galactically as opposed to just globally.
And who's going to do that and how's that going to work?
So, part of the pressure here is the globalists want a central point for the multi planetary civilization.
But the other thing is they're perfectly happy in a negative return on the system, investment system, to basically liquidate the United States to keep their global empire and position going.
Let's pick right up on that because that's so key.
They, and it's something that you've talked about extensively in your report, which is they're setting up conditions for a civil war or the breakup of the United States as one of their scenarios.
And you've talked about this because they've had the missing trillions taken out of the country.
You've talked about them shipping the money out of the country, but they still have the liabilities in the country.
And so if we have.
Right.
So this is a financial coup d'etat.
Yes.
So you have a new system and you have an old system.
Okay.
And your old system, what you do is you drain all the money and you move it into the new system.
Okay.
So on day one, I have my assets and liabilities in the old system.
I bring up a new system and I move my assets into the new system.
Okay.
Now in the old system, I have lots of liabilities.
Right.
Yes.
Okay.
And I knew this day was going to come in November and December 1995 when I started to implement, design, and implement this plan.
I knew the day would come when I'd have all the assets here and all the liabilities here, right?
Right.
I don't have all the assets out because there's still assets here, but I have a lot of them out.
Okay.
Now, what do I do?
How do I get rid of the liabilities without having to give back the assets, right?
Because one of my dangers is everybody in the old system can say, hey, wait a minute, where are the assets and come get them back.
Right.
But if you destroy the old system, Then they have no legal mechanism to come and get the assets back.
Exactly.
Right.
So, for example, the old system, in this case, the United States.
Well, I would say yes, the United States government, but the Constitution and the federal accounts.
What you're talking about is the federal government accounts and the related central bank.
So, those accounts had obligations and assets, and those obligations and assets have been criminally impaired.
And that gives within that system the ability to say and do something about that, as long as the mechanism exists.
Now, what I think they decided to do was in 1995, when they became hopelessly frustrated with the refusal of the body politic in America to.
Support a financially responsible system.
They just said, I give up.
I give up.
I'll just take the money.
And the way we'll do this will bubble the economy and we'll stuff everybody's pension funds and retirement accounts full of treasury obligations.
And they'll end up with an IOU from themselves.
Wow.
So if you look at all those liabilities, it's a very clever trick what they've done politically.
So once you pull the assets out, now.
You know, all those pension funds and all those retirement accounts and social security are all full of IOUs from the U.S. government backed by our taxes.
So we, you know, we put $25 billion into the pension funds, and that money financed their taking the $25 billion and moving it into the new system.
And now we have $25 billion of IOUs from ourselves.
Incredible.
And so, when you think about it, it's very nitric because we put in $25 billion of cash, and all that happened was we created a liability from ourselves.
Right.
And this is so supported.
I cite this story a lot about Ronald Reagan in the 80s trying to look at the Social Security system, and guys like David Stockman saying, There's nothing in there, just a bunch of IOUs, and him being horrified at the idea that when you actually looked into the Social Security fund, which everybody's been paying into, there's nothing in there but IOUs.
This is the same system transported 30 years later.
An IOU from the federal government that was full of those assets before they got taken was very valuable.
Right.
There are tremendous, you know, North America is the most valuable piece of real estate on the planet, arguably.
So, if you look at all the assets of the federal government, there are a ton of assets, not to mention a nuclear arsenal, which is a very effective, you know, and rod of God and whatever else we've got in there.
Yeah.
Of course, the question is, had they moved all of that into corporate balance sheets?
I mean, they have private contractors running our nuclear labs.
It's pretty scary.
Yes.
So there are plenty of assets there.
But if the federal government, if all those Treasury securities were collateralized by the federal government that hadn't had the $50 trillion disappeared, I dare say they would be worth a lot more today.
No question about it.
And they've been disappearing out the back door.
You've been tracking that.
Your estimation of where they're going, because it's a very hard thing because they're all behind a wall of secrecy.
Where are they going?
So, I have no idea where they're going.
I've tried to just play around and guess.
So, I think the first place they're going is they're going into what one journalist called top secret America.
So, you have extensive underground bases being built.
You know, how do you engineer this much secrecy?
You have to do a lot of stuff underground.
Right.
So, you've engineered a huge underground base with underground transportation.
That's why when people say, we haven't invested any money in infrastructure, I'm like, no, we've invested trillions.
You just can't see it.
As you know, I think after the Kennedy assassination, if you look at the trajectory of space investment as a percentage of GNP, I think we kept doing that.
We just took it dark.
And one of the ways we did it was with, you know, I also think a lot of this money has been moved into.
The equivalent of an endowment.
If you look at how much money has been stolen, you can create an endowment that, with dividends and interest, can run a global government privately.
So I think space is one.
I think the underground bases are one.
I think a lot of money was pulled out, and that's what financed China.
My question on China is who owns China?
It's not clear to me that China owns China.
So I think the globalization move, a lot of money was.
You know, I really do believe the money left DOD and HUD.
It financed the Clinton Foundation, the Epstein operation, but I think a whole bunch went to Carlyle, KKR, TPG, and the private equity firms for investment in Asia and the emerging markets.
How could we get a chance to prove that?
How would you get into their bank accounts?
What would need to happen?
You would need to have a critical mass, you know, it's going to take up to 10%.
Of the American society to start to assert control locally.
And you'd have to get enough of that to demand real litigation.
I think it could come if we decided, you know, to me, the weak, the vulnerable spot in the Death Star is that they are in violation of the financial management laws.
And so if we can bring the appropriate litigation to hold both the central bank.
And the banks as depository, the New York Fed as depository for where that money went.
If we could get jurisdiction, particularly in any of the state courts, and demand that money back.
But I think the focus of the litigation should be on getting transparency.
Right, right, absolutely.
You brought in the missing trillions in a way that they haven't been looked at before, and you brought them in with two decades of research, and then.
Professor Skidmore picked up on your research.
He looked into it and verified it through DOD and HUD.
Now, that alone is a great accomplishment.
And what happened in that period was even people like Forbes and organizations like that had to look at this and start to say, Are there 21 trillion missing in government?
And then later, the New York Times saying in a particularly pedantic manner, Oh, no, there's not 21 trillion missing.
You know, this is just audit stuff.
Don't worry.
Don't look over here.
Clever Media Manipulation Tactics 00:05:04
One of my favorite things is, you know, I've been through this.
It started for me in 1998 when I first started to warn about the money disappearing.
And I've watched, so let's see, 98 is 22 years of excuses as to why they can't produce audited financial statements.
I haven't for a long time.
And it's really interesting.
Something that sounds rational in year one or Justifiable or maybe okay by year three.
You know, after you hear it every year for 20 years, you know, you look at it very differently.
And it's been very interesting for me to live through the education of Dr. Mark Skidmore as, you know, as the obfuscation and games happen.
And we just had about a year and a half ago this major effort by the Shriekameter and the New York Times as part of it, trying to, you know, oh, this is just nothing.
This is just a counting process.
And it's so interesting.
And they used AOC to do this, it was very clever the way they did it.
Yes.
Yeah.
Interesting choice.
Yeah.
Very interesting choice.
Because they kind of, you know, they got all the conservative guys to say it's not real.
By having AOC say it's real, then of course the conservatives had to say, oh, she's a bimbo.
It's not real.
Yeah.
It was very clever the way they did it.
And they used CNN, you know, what's Gloria Vanderbilt's son's name?
I can never remember his name.
Yeah.
Cooper Anderson.
Cooper Anderson, you know, kind of.
Lawyer with AOC, where AOC did a mea culp and said, you know, I was wrong.
It wasn't really, really, you know, blah, You know, and the conservatives were saying, Sue, you were right.
And it was very clever the way they did it.
And, you know, I always felt whoever the guy was in charge of figuring out FASB 56, you know, somewhere, I'll just pick this out.
So let's just pretend for a second there's a guy named Harry, and he was in charge of figuring out how they take the book secret without, you know, and I think they.
I have a theory on who the committee was who did this, but I thought they thought that this was something very boring, very down in the nuts and bolts, and they would sneak this one through.
I don't think they ever believed that we would be able to pick up on it, document it, and blow it up and really explain to independent media what it would mean in a way that independent media could just independently run with it.
When we did, I think somebody said, you know, You got to get her back for this one, and that was the AOC, Anderson Cooper, blah blah blah blah.
And they put a lot of work into getting us back on that one, and it was really, uh, you know, it was a major boot down.
And then you have to learn when those things happen is you just have to turtle through and just say, you know, you know, it's an incredible accomplishment bringing it up to the point where they need to address it in the first place.
They may have their guns ready to shoot it down, but to get them to address it.
Beyond the ignoring it thing is very significant.
Well, because they're in dangerous territory.
They were able to get the whole Q, you know, if you look at the Q cult, yes.
What the Q cult ultimately is pushing is the same agenda as the transhumanists, you know, global IDs.
It's amazing how the Q is just proposing all these really totalitarian things.
But they got the whole Q cult and that whole world to ignore FASB 56.
Right.
You know, they were able to keep.
They were able to keep the Patriots away from the power line, and that I think was their goal.
Here's what they weren't able to do they weren't able to keep the investors away because what we were able to do was communicate with all the investors on the planet.
Right.
You know, this is really going on.
And that's kind of a subtle earthquake.
Well, I think the investors are making their deals with them.
You know, so it may be a subtle earthquake, but it's not necessarily a good one.
It's not necessarily on the side of freedom.
You don't know.
Right.
You just have to, you know, what I know is we can't get out of a negative return on in society.
There are two ways to get out of a negative return.
One is to massively reduce the population, and the other is to change to a positive return.
And we can't change to a positive return without transparency.
And transparency brought on, no matter how organic and messy it is, transparency can stop a major reduction in the population.
Subtle Earthquake of Control 00:14:58
Right.
They can't pull off that kind of culling with transparency.
No question.
You know, it's fascinating.
Everyone, you're here with Dark Journalist, and we're here with Catherine Austin Fitz, the former assistant secretary of HUD.
We're going to take some questions.
I'm going to kind of go in there.
So if you ask some questions, ask them all in caps, and I will ask them to Catherine in the second part of our interview here.
Catherine, I wanted to get into.
Wait a minute.
Wait a minute.
Some guy said we're doomed.
Not at all.
There it is.
We're doomed.
No, if we keep pretending that it's not going on, we're doomed.
But if we talk about this, you know, that's the funny thing.
It's a chicken and egg.
One of my favorite quotes from Confucius is he says, The way out is through the door.
Why is it no one will avail themselves of this method?
So we can't get to real solutions until we face what's going on.
And the reason nobody wants to face what's going on is their immediate reaction is, We're doomed.
I said, So that's step one.
Step two is I guess we're not, but we're going to have to do something.
Let's take one minute or two and just look through these questions for a minute.
And you can just shout them out as you go if you want.
Somebody said transparency partly means the X File stuff.
That's interesting because.
It is.
Absolutely.
Yeah.
It's interesting that so much voter fraud took place in Nevada.
We know it's famous for something else besides voter fraud.
But this is interesting, Catherine, because they've been engineering miscounts in Nevada for a long, long time.
The people who count the COVID cases and deaths were also counting the ballots, you know.
Well, they did.
They came out, and this is something that Grinnell put out, which was that the person who is certifying the voting results in Arizona has all these BLM associations, right?
And she was on record in 2017 and 2018 saying Trump's a fascist.
So, that kind of lack of impartiality you see all over this election.
I mean, the election is kind of a disaster in terms of voting integrity.
There was no voter integrity in this election.
I mean, that's here's the problem it's interesting.
I don't know if you've ever listened to or watched Brett Weinstein.
Brett Weinstein and his wife Heather were professors at Evergreen College, where they had the sort of Lord of the Flies escapades.
And Brett Weinstein really tried to communicate to the university, you know, the whole university sort of community, both faculty and students, that there are some fundamental precepts of civilization.
And if you don't respect them, civilization is literally not possible.
Right.
Right.
And what we're talking about here is not a corrupt election.
We're talking about removing the basis by which civilization can exist.
Right.
And this is why I keep coming back.
Did I tell you my Antifa story?
No, tell that one.
That's very interesting.
So I have a wonderful subscriber who is very intelligent.
And excessively curious in a wonderful way.
He just wants to know.
And he will drill down to the nanoparticle level to get to the bottom of anything.
I love him.
I like him.
No, this guy is absolutely wonderful.
Anyway, so he went to one of the European protests.
And he's standing there, and there's another guy next to him from the other side of the country who's come to the protest.
He doesn't know him, but he's just standing there.
And the Antifa group.
Attack this guy with chairs and bottles.
I mean, very dangerous.
They could have hurt him or really killed him.
Wow.
So the crowd moves in to protect him and to pull the Antifa people away.
But of course, my wonderfully curious subscriber won't leave it at that.
He's got to find out what happened.
So he goes to the Antifa guys and said, Why did you attack this guy?
And they all said, He gave a Nazi salute.
And the subscriber said, No, he didn't.
Wow.
He didn't.
I mean, he was standing right there.
He didn't.
But that's what they saw.
Now, let's go back to the game Pokemon.
Yes.
Because the other thing my subscriber said is he said these people were so mind controlled, it was absolutely terrifying.
Oh, yeah.
He said they were totally mind controlled.
So, is it possible, a la Pokemon, for a Nazi salute to be communicated like a hologram to these people and they really think they saw it?
Amazing.
Because he said they were sincere.
They really saw, they really believed they had seen this guy do a Nazi salute.
And he had, but they believed it.
Incredible.
Right.
That's the technology level that we're talking about behind the curtain, because of course they have a huge amount of technology that we know nothing about.
Right.
It's completely hidden.
And that plays a huge factor in what we're seeing play out.
Right.
So let's go back to civilization.
How can you have a civilization if people are being engineered to see something that doesn't exist?
Whether it's fake news on YouTube or Pokemon Nazi salute beamed into the head of an Antifa zombie.
Right.
Right.
And there's quite a few.
Well, to do the real estate acquisition plan, you need a lot of Antifa.
Right.
You mentioned something to me earlier about.
Three types of things that you can get when you are researching.
You can get entertainment, you can get intelligence, and you can get news.
News, right.
Can you break those down for me?
Because that's what we're missing in our understanding that so much of what we're seeing on the independent side is entertainment, and on the mainstream media side is disinformation.
How do we get to separate between entertainment and news and intelligence and realize that we have to pay for intelligence?
So, I would describe news as just sort of what happened, the 411.
So, you know, SpaceX launched a rocket today.
That's news.
So, and news tends to, when you watch the flow of news, there's so many data points that it can become very noisy and incoherent.
Yes.
And so, what intelligence does is intelligence scans the news, studies the news, and finds the deeper patterns.
Right.
And also finds the points of opportunity and risk management that translate that flow of news into intelligence that I can use to navigate my life, that I can use to find opportunities, that I can find to help me avoid risk.
Okay.
So, intelligence is the process by which you translate the news into something that's useful for busy people.
Yes.
Right.
Entertainment.
Is fun, is, you know, you and I know.
I mean, what's your favorite movie?
You tell me.
You know, entertainment is something that keeps you very, very busy, very, very enthralled, and it is fun, right?
Yeah.
Right.
Okay.
And it's very important to get your entertainment independent of your news and intelligence.
Okay.
Because the way I can trick you into disinformation.
Is by engaging your, you know, sort of your emotion, whether it's to scare you or fascinate you or make you laugh.
You know, a lot of the entertainment component is how you get people to suck into fake news and really intelligence, which is very much against their, you know, that tricks them.
And it's usually, you know, they lose time and money because they've gotten tricked.
So, this is, let's say, mass arrests or George Soros is going to get Mo, wave goodbye to the prison barge, all that stuff.
That was good entertainment, but it didn't do anything to move the culture forward or help us with the political situation.
So, I'm a person who loves entertainment.
No, I love entertainment.
I love great movies.
I'm a real movie.
I'm a really movie person.
I mean, the whole Solari movie.
Right.
So, so.
We all, I think we all immensely enjoy entertainment.
And it's very important that you get your entertainment injection separate from your intelligence.
You know what I mean?
In other words, I mean, sometimes they can combine them.
You know, I have very great sources of intelligence that can be very, very funny.
That's why we do cartoons and our crazy posters and other things.
So I'm not saying intelligence can't be entertaining, but the first thing you do is never deny yourself your weekly dose of entertainment.
And that's so that you don't make the mistake of needing it, of wanting it, and trying to get it in the wrong place.
It's like I'm always telling every time a friend of mine would get divorced, I'd say, Look, get yourself a great masseuse and a great cleaning lady.
And I always say, Why?
And I say, Because you need to know, you need to get these in the proper places and not make the mistake of getting married again because you need a masseuse and a cleaning lady.
So you need to get these in the right place.
Okay.
You mentioned something about Mr. Global pays a lot for good intelligence and how that's a good lesson for us.
What are you getting at there?
That's interesting to me.
Because you're more invested.
So I grew up in a world where good intelligence was everything.
Good intelligence was the basis of winning.
Good intelligence was, you know, it won wars and it won on Wall Street.
Good intelligence was everything.
And we were moving very fast in a very uncertain world.
And so the guy who had 2% of the intelligence on a situation, you know, 2% was if everybody else had 1%, you had 2%, that's millions of profit.
Right?
Right.
So we didn't wait for perfect information.
We didn't wait for right.
You know, we were looking for useful.
Yes.
And intelligence was the edge.
And literally, Mr. Global, in my experience, spends an absolute fortune on intelligence.
An absolute fortune on, you know, so if you look at official reality and you look at reality, they're spending a fortune on crafting and marketing the official reality.
But they're spending a fortune on tracking and understanding and analyzing reality.
And they're very much into inventing and creating reality, and you need massive amounts of constant intelligence to do that.
And one of the reasons they want everybody on AI and Zoom and software is anything they can do like that to massively increase and centralize their intelligence, the better.
Absolutely.
I mean, when you think about it, if you look, we did a wonderful Solari report called Control 101.
And if you look at the goal of digital systems, it's basically to have everybody and everything online and under surveillance.
And now we're talking with the transhumanism of basically putting an operating system in the humans' bodies.
And all of that is intelligence to help them manage the herd.
Because they have a great fear of people becoming awake and turning on these systems that they've created and them.
Right.
So imagine living through the French Revolution.
Yeah.
You know, it's funny because my training in the sort of establishment was, you know, these guys are planners.
I'll never forget, I was flying out to Detroit when I was on Wall Street, and the plane went into a hiccup and started on a deep dive.
Yeah.
Have I ever told you this story?
I don't know.
So the plane goes into this deep dive, and the stewardess just happened to be standing right next to our row.
Yeah.
And she screams, she screams out, Oh my God, we're all going to die.
Wow.
Now, what I didn't know when that happened was that that was her first day on the job after training.
So she was a little wet behind the ears.
Anyway, so she screams, We're all going to die.
And the first thing I thought, you know what my first thought was?
This is my training.
I need a plan.
And then my second thing, the second thing was, I couldn't plan or act my way out of this.
There was, Oh, Plan's not going to help.
I'm going to die.
And then I thought, it's funny because the woman who raised me at this point had died.
And I thought, well, I'm going to see Eleanor.
And then I realized, well, you know, there's some good, there's a bright side to this.
I'm going to get to see Eleanor.
And then, of course, the plane came, you know, the pilot, you know, was amazing because I thought we were, you know, two seconds behind, but he got us turned up.
And right.
And that's after it, I learned that it was her first real day.
Separated by Alien Forces 00:09:01
Incredible.
She had a bad first day.
Catherine, you talk a lot about what the transhumanist movement and what it's trying to do.
Now it's right in our face.
You've been talking about it for years and what they've been up to.
And you have a whole section dedicated, as you say, to Bill Gates' creepy technology.
When you look at what they're essentially trying to do with things like smartphones, with things like nanoparticles in injections, what is it that, and with the COVID stuff also, the cover your face and all this, you know, don't interact with each other.
What are they fundamentally trying to do there to human interaction?
What's the purpose behind it?
In the middle of a creative shared intelligence.
Yes.
Okay.
So we are physical beings, but we're electromagnetic beings and we resonate with all life.
We resonate with the sunlight and the sun, with the birds and the trees and the animals, with each other and all life.
And literally, what these guys, as far as I can tell, are trying to do is put a toll booth between every connection.
And circumvent the resonation into their machines.
Wow.
So they literally want to grid the entire morphogenic field and get us to resonate with the machine instead of with life and each other.
You know, this is trying to make themselves God.
I really do think they want us to have, they want children to come out of test tubes.
They decide who gets to come here and who doesn't.
They don't want families.
They don't want.
Husbands and wives, you know, they want to control literally all life.
Wow.
And it's so bizarre.
You can't even believe it.
You know, it's hard to fathom, but they really think they can outperform life.
Amazing.
If you have a middle class person who is just going through their regular routine and they see the election change or whatever, and they see these changes with COVID and they accept the official story, And so on.
What's the real danger for them not being able to fathom just how dark the vision is of the people who are putting this out, the gates, the who?
It very much depends on who they are and where they are.
Many of the people, so Hopkins calls them the Covidian cults.
Many of these people.
Can't fathom how nuts the whole thing is.
And it's very difficult to do it.
I lived through, for two decades, I lived through watching John Rappaport and his allies map out fake epidemics.
And I've lived through multiple fake epidemics with John for two decades.
And if I hadn't done that, I would never have been able to follow.
You know, the Covidian cold and what they were up to, because it's so hard to fathom that it's that amazingly nuts and that their engineering of the global control systems is that phenomenal and their mind control is that phenomenal.
You know, but thank God I had because when this hit, you know, I had lived and the last straw was using Ebola for the Republicans to win the Senate in 2014.
That was amazing.
I mean, sometime we should go through that one because it was a great case study.
And building up to what we're doing now.
Anyway, that was a shriek a meter moment.
Oh my God.
The shriek a meter had never been louder until March 2020.
Anyway, so it's hard for people to do that.
Now, so they can't fathom that the official reality and reality are that far away.
Right.
And they don't have the science and the background and the research to know how that is engineered.
Now, if you follow the money, you know and you can see how it's done.
So that's hard.
But the other thing is they believe they're better off by playing ball.
Yeah.
And if remember when I said you keep these different pillars separate, so what the tech guys are doing is separate from the pharma guys, it's different than the military guys, it's different than the central banks.
Because I look at all of them, you know, I look at JPAL and I say, Why would you want your grandchildren to be slaves?
Right now, many people in those different pillars are thinking, If I play ball and do right and make enough money and have enough prestige.
Then I will be able to get the low dose for my grandkids, or I'll be able to get exceptions.
Or, you know, as you remember my story about being invited to join the Council on Foreign Relations, and I'll have my name on the locker in the underground base.
You're right.
And they, I think they believe that they'll be able to skate by making enough money and having enough power in the system.
I disagree.
I think you're building a prison.
You know, you're basically building the prison that your children, your grandchildren, and your descendants will be caught in.
Why would you do that?
I mean, this goes back to my question about William Dieffendorfer and the economic hitman of student loan.
Go read that article because one of the things I talk about was why would Bill make money systematically destroying the system that gave him a chance?
Right.
Why would he destroy that chance for the next generation and generations after?
Why would he think he can get a bunch of money, put his kids in private school, and destroy the next generation's future?
Why would he do that?
Why would any human being do that?
That's the question for all these guys.
Now, I really think they believe there's still a middle of the road and they can skate through on the middle of the road.
And I don't think there is.
I think, you know, it's freedom or slavery, it's transhumanism or a human civilization, and death is not the worst thing that can happen.
Right.
Now, we haven't brought up the most weird scenario, and the most weird scenario, as you know, is David Jacobs Wright.
Yes.
Right.
And that is an alien takeover, basically.
Or an interdimensional.
Yes.
And this is actually very fascinating because there's so much research around it.
And certainly the UFO file is undeniable beyond just its incredible technological impact.
There's something else happening there.
So, yes, I mean, then you go really to the outside of it, you look at it and you say, is it aliens?
You know, is that what we're looking at here?
Because it is acting so alien.
I mean, I was talking.
What I said, it's funny because I wrote all about what you and I are discussing.
I wrote an article in 2002 all about this.
And I said, what's important to understand is either aliens exist or we have become as aliens from each other.
In other words, the official reality and the reality have separated so much, and the leadership class has separated so much from the average person.
That we have become as if separate species.
So even if aliens don't exist, you need to understand that they do.
Right.
Because we have a leadership class that sees us as an alien species.
Yes.
Right.
So you're talking about, you can use it in reality or use it as the metaphor for what we see taking place.
Yeah.
Right.
So this is an alien invasion.
And you need to understand that, you know, whether there are no aliens or there are aliens, it might as well, you need to think of this as aliens.
And part of the question is how can we get, you know, how can we get the human leadership?
To come back and re empathize with us.
One of my favorite movies on this whole topic is The Neverending Story.
Uh huh.
When, you know, when the protagonist says to the nothing, you know, to the bad guys, I wish you had a heart.
That's my wish.
I wish you had a heart.
And what he's trying to do is recreate empathy between us.
Secession and Financial Risks 00:15:40
Right.
You know, it's trying to rebuild the living field because that's what they're doing.
They're trying to tear the living field apart.
That's why, you know, love is so important because the thing that wins people out of the cult is love.
I mean, you can throw science and facts at them all day long, but most people are in the cult out of fear, not out of facts.
Right.
Right.
So they need to know there's love outside the cult.
Yes.
Exactly.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
We're here with Catherine Austin Fitz.
She, of course, is the publisher of the Solari Report.
And so much experience in government, deep in government, deep in finance.
Catherine, when you look around at what's happening now, when we started, we were looking at, you know, I made a comment about seeing you there in these Senate committees when you first got in to HUD and you were cleaning up fraud then.
And this takes us back to about 1990, I guess.
So I have to tell you, it was so funny because I had forgotten, you know, we brought up our own video server and I'm usually pretty good about archiving historical information.
Information.
And I did a very good job during the litigation archiving sort of historical information about being assistant secretary because they try and delete your past.
And they literally tried to wipe me out and couldn't.
And it was because I was doing such a good job.
Anyway, but these ding dongs, I forget what their names are, came along and said I'd never been assistant secretary of housing.
And I was laughing my head off.
It was so funny.
So I posted the thing about.
From President Bush saying thank you for having served as assistant secretary.
I posted that, but then you jumped on and posted all the C SPAN videos.
I had not seen them for years and years and years.
And I was laughing my head off.
I could just.
Do you relate to that person there trying to figure things out in Washington in the heart of it?
When you look back at it now, do you see that connective journey to where you are now?
Yeah, you know, and I have to tell you, I did a great job.
No wonder they booted me out fast.
I'll never forget.
I think I told you this story.
I was sitting across, I had eight partners from like Pricewaterhouse and Arthur Anderson.
And I said, I'm going to create a database of all multifamily properties because you can't manage.
We had a $25 billion multifamily insurance portfolio.
And I said, I need a database of all the properties.
And they said, No, we'll just do a survey.
I said, No, you can't.
You know, you have to have a database of the actual property and the address and the data.
And they were like looking at me and And I thought they were all going to piss on the floor, literally.
But they couldn't explain to me why that was not appropriate to do.
Why would a financial institution not want the basic data on their positions?
Yeah.
Can you imagine a bank where it's illegal to know what you've lent to?
Right.
There's a much deeper system going on there, and they're just kind of surfing on top.
Well, but here's the thing I knew from the moment I got in there, I knew exactly what to do.
You know, if you wanted to run the thing, According to the law.
So, under the law in the single family fund, you had to charge enough for your mortgage insurance premiums to pay for your foreclosures, your defaults, and your expenses.
So, if you wanted to get the thing on a financially sustainable basis, I knew exactly what to do and how to do it.
And that was the problem because they were pulling out loads of money out the back door.
And of course, I was shutting the window.
So, but I knew exactly how to find it and do it.
It was funny.
I mean, it was so funny to see them try and wiggle away from real.
It was funny because when I first got there, I called in the budget guy and I said, I want to see the budget.
So he brings this budget with the justifications, literally went from this desk to the ceiling.
So I'm a speed reader.
I read the whole thing four times over the weekend because under the law, it was required for the single family fund to be self supporting.
And there was no way in the budget that I could figure out what the total revenues and expenses were and whether or not we were in compliance.
Compliance.
So I called the budget officer back in and I said, okay, I've read this four times.
I can't find whether or not we're generating a profit or a loss.
He said, well, that's not in the budget.
I said, well, you know, where do I find that?
Because under the law, I'm required as a fiduciary in the FHA fund, the FHA commissioner has sole fiduciary obligation to make sure that this law is obeyed.
So it's me, it's not the president, it's me.
So I said, okay, where do I find that?
He said, Well, the accountants have that information.
I said, okay, give me their name and number.
He said, you're not allowed to talk to them.
They report to another assistant secretary.
So, long story short, I had these great deputies, and we had all been major donors during the campaign.
So, we laid siege.
That's how I met Bill Diefendorfer.
We laid siege to OMB, took them all to the Occidental Grill.
We spent thousands of dollars whining and dining and lobbying.
And the result was we got the accountants moved over to report to me.
So they come in the door, I get them engineered, they move over, and I discover we're losing $11 million a day in the single family fund.
Wow.
And it was really easy to stop.
And of course, the minute I stopped it, you can't imagine.
Suddenly I had 400,000 new enemies.
Why do they think HUD is such a candy store for Black Ops?
Because real estate is everywhere, it's so big, it you know, it's every you know, you're talking about 100% of the land of America, essentially.
You know, the real because HUD does a HUD form for every real estate transaction in the country, it's a fabulous database.
That's what I said.
You know, if I don't go to the Federal Reserve, I'll go to HUD because that's the richest database on all the money in the country, yes.
So, wow, phenomenal.
Um.
If you were to look out and we're taking a look at what they're trying to make trendy, is this idea of splitting up the United States and that there's a reason for this, as you've been pointing out, with the whole Civil War aspect and being able to get out of those liabilities and obligations that are really.
Well, no, but you can also get your hands on the rest of the assets.
You know, because I can launder, I can bubble the economy and with securities fraud launder trains out the back door.
Yes.
But I cannot launder the national parks out the back door.
Right.
Right.
So, what is Alaska?
80, 90% of Alaska is federal land, right?
I can't wander Alaska out the back door with security fraud, right?
So, I'll never forget, I was at the Aspen Institute in 2017 for a conference.
And this ding dong who's running for the Libertarian Party, he's running for president.
He gets up and he makes this very fashionable speech about, oh, here's what we do.
You know, I'm going to become president and then I'll shut down the federal government by executive order.
And then we'll auction off all the assets and we'll just use Bitcoin to transact and we'll all live more modestly.
That was his speech.
And you listen to this, and so everybody's cheering like this is very fashionable.
So I stood up, and one other guy stood up, and I said, Okay, so your parents' military pensions, your social security, all of that is just going away.
And I said, They did this.
It was called the Rape of Russia.
They did it in Russia, 15% downsizing in population in several short years.
Wow.
And I said, what they're going to do, this is like a Goldman Sachs wet dream because you're going to shut down 50% of the income in every community and county in the country tomorrow because it's all coming from the federal government.
And what that means is you've got three weeks of food, three weeks of cash, three weeks you can live without food or cash.
That's nine weeks, right?
What happens next?
So now nobody's got any money, and now you're going to auction off the rest of the federal government assets, particularly land and real estate, you know, and nuclear arsenal.
I'm sure the Russian mob would enjoy having that nuclear arsenal.
So you're going to auction all of this stuff.
Well, how's it going to sell?
It's going to sell for 10 cents on the dollar, just like it did in Russia.
Wow.
And the Goldman Sachs guys are going to get the rest for almost free.
That's so cool.
That's so cool.
It's piratization.
It's piratization and disaster capitalism.
It's really funny.
Everybody came up to me afterwards and they said, Oh, this guy is really sincere.
He just doesn't know.
Meantime, he was busted on a felony in Virginia and then let out with his record cleansed.
Yeah.
I know you're talking about it.
Yeah, that whole story was bizarre.
Right.
It really was.
This is what we used to call in Washington a trial balloon.
Yes.
So they were seeing if they could roll this, you know, they could roll and sell this.
You get a lot of good market research data from rolling that out there and seeing what they can get.
What's interesting is part two of that is trying to make it trendy to secede.
So we hear about these little movements saying, I'm going to secede here, I'm going to secede there.
And they're not thinking, when I secede, I lose, as you've said, all of that generational inheritance.
And this is really what they're after.
So, when you look at secession, the money can work out differently in many different ways.
But the important thing, when you look at the federal government, what most people see are 24 agencies, the Treasury, the Central Bank.
What I see is a few defense contractors running one giant database.
Right.
And that database, more often than not, relates to transactions, checks, cash flow.
They're collecting taxes in.
They're selling treasuries into our pension funds, collecting the money from our pension funds in, and then they're sending checks out.
Right.
So the military pensions, the defense contracts, the Social Security, the Medicare, the welfare, the food stamps, on and on and on.
It's all financial transactions.
Now, they've been working very hard for several years to get giant clouds issued by DOD, intelligence agencies, and the Navy.
They've got them all issued.
You've got Leto's, who's the old Lockheed Martin Systems.
You've got Microsoft having DoD, and you've got Amazon, who's got all the intelligence agencies.
Once they have the data beast, you know, clouded up and the Fed ready to do going direct, you're talking about the ability to radically re engineer all those cash flows.
So, one of the things you have to think about is how do they want to re engineer all those cash flows?
That looks to me they want to simplify by just converting everything to a universal basic income.
Yes.
Right.
Cancel all that stuff.
Everybody gets a check.
You're on, you know, take your check and figure it out.
So that's a massive simplification.
And to me, that's probably part of going direct.
And that's interesting, too, because, you know, someone's value is based on their productivity in a regular economic system.
To take away their productivity, Their value goes down in that system.
Eventually, that person is there receiving a check.
They have a smartphone.
They become kind of a dross on society.
They become expendable.
Expendable.
That's it.
Right.
And that's pretty much the idea.
Right.
So that's where the robotics come in, really.
Here's your UBI.
We've taken over your jobs.
We're rolling this in, and it's for your own good.
Right.
Except I would say there are two things to consider here.
The first thing is, By putting, you know, by downloading the operating system in the humans, you can get the humans online teaching the robots how to do everything.
Right.
Right.
So, part of this is integrating the humans and the robotics and the taxation and labor system and getting the humans to teach the robots how to do everything.
And that's where the AI and software come in.
So, if you get everybody hooked up and online and working with the clouds, then the intellectual transfer can happen.
But the second thing is, remember, we have the thing they're trying to destroy in addition to love is imagination.
Right.
Because we have the power and the ability to create and invent our world.
We can create babies and we can create all sorts of stuff.
We can create our world.
Yes.
And part of getting us hooked up like this is to stop all of that.
Because it makes it so much harder to control.
You know, they're unpredictable.
You know, I'm back to risk management.
And remember, risk management, you know, if we didn't have secrecy, we would see the risks they're managing and we would presumably act to also manage those risks.
You know, if we're operating in secrecy, then we don't know what risks they're managing.
You know, if you look at their ways of communicating, they're not working and they don't trust us because we're in the dark.
Right.
Right.
And so, years of being in the dark.
So, putting us on these systems, they can proceed to risk manage much more easily.
They can manage the pros while they're risk managing and it's much more easy.
They think.
Now, what you're watching, I would argue, is they have they are tremendously emboldened by the success of the mind control technology.
You know, it's been wildly successful, it's really worked for them.
The problem is, the more you try and engineer life with mind control and the machine, the more nuts and incoherent everybody gets.
Now, part of the incoherence is you're using the shriek a meter to make people incoherent, it's a tactic, yes.
You know, what I'm watching is I really feel like by corrupting the general mind with the mind control technology, it's also making them crazy.
Interpersonal Skills in Chaos 00:07:04
And I always say people who win in a rig game get stupid.
And I literally think, as a society, Western civilization right now is collectively we're losing our minds.
Right, exactly.
Right.
And so, and it's become a very small group.
Is in charge of the information that we're getting.
We've seen tremendous censorship.
Just look at the last election where they censored on Twitter the president of the United States because they didn't like what he was saying.
You know, it would have been very interesting to see what would have happened if Donald Trump.
You know, Donald Trump has many positive characteristics, but interpersonal skills are not one of them.
Right.
And I dare say if his interpersonal skills had been, you know, sort of average to excellent, you know, he would have probably been assassinated by now.
Yes.
His lack of interpersonal skills may have saved his life.
But part of the problem is you have a lot of people in the establishment backing Biden and opposing Trump.
And if you look at their reasons, they're completely legitimate.
Because they find him to be so unable to manage large bureaucracy.
You know, he's someone who manages real estate developments, and his style can be very good for managing a small family office and real estate developments.
Now, what's interesting, he's gotten quite an education, and I think he's much better at what he does.
No question.
Yeah.
Right.
It's funny.
One of the people I really respect a lot in Washington is Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson.
And he was part of the transition project.
And he is rabidly hates Donald Trump.
He sounds like me when Donald Trump first started to run.
I just couldn't believe anybody would think of having Donald Trump be president.
Anyway, but it was funny because Wilkerson was saying something about, you know, look at the terrible things this guy has done.
And I said, wait a minute, Wilkerson.
You were the guy who engineered Powell's speech at the UN where he got us into a $10 trillion war in the Middle East.
I mean, you know, come on.
Right.
And, you know, in Iraq.
What?
WMD in Iraq.
Right, right.
You know, and I don't know, you know, Trump is the great thing about what Trump has accomplished is he has put a crack into the official reality.
And a lot of light has come through that.
And I, you know, I'm sure the empire will never forgive him for that.
One of the things that Joseph Farrell said when we were talking on Tuesday is that they despise him because he's a traitor to his own class, that billionaire ruling class.
How do you feel about that?
Trump was never accepted into that class.
You know, Trump was always.
It's funny, I told you this.
I went back and I got all the documentaries I could on the Scottish clans.
Yeah.
And I finally realized oh, Trump is just a Scottish clansman.
Because they were so unbelievably violent.
They were very competitive and fought.
They just fought, fought, fought, fought.
So Trump was never part of the.
His style was just not.
He was never welcomed in.
Right.
Absolutely.
When you see people like John Brennan and James Clapper come out immediately after election night, not even when the results are done, and say, we need to remove Trump by the 25th Amendment, patriots, show your patriotism, get your spine up.
And we know the kinds of crimes that guys like Clapper and Brennan have been in on, especially Brennan.
And knowing Brennan, by the way, is a big one for.
UFO disclosure, CIA, TTSA style.
What's interesting to me is what are they pulling if they're so confident that they've got Trump out by saying, we want him out before January 20th?
And why the hysteria and nervousness and doing it everywhere from CNN, MSNBC, and all those junk networks?
We see Brennan out there waving this 25th Amendment flag.
My guess is you're doing everything you can to make Trump look not presidential.
Because remember, the thing if you look at the extent of the election fraud, then if you're Brennan and Clapper, you have to believe in the worst case that the Republicans have a chance of both getting the White House and the Senate.
And if that happens, you're in real trouble.
I mean, you're in real trouble.
And so you need to make sure that Trump doesn't have the resources or the brand he needs to make the fight in the courts between now and January 20th.
So, you're going to do everything you can to make him look not presidential.
And that's a brand game.
Yes.
And you're going to try, you also know, let's say the courts decide that Biden is the president.
And so, Biden is the president elect.
So, today is November 13.
This guy's got over 67 days to basically throw you in jail, indict you, bury you.
Yeah.
Now, one of the things Trump has not done for his presidency, and he's been criticized very strongly, is there's a huge amount of stuff he could declassify.
Yes.
Okay.
And let's say it's decided next week that Biden has won, then Trump's got 60 days to declassify enough stuff to bury Clapper and Brennan forever.
Yes.
And they want to make sure that he doesn't have the power to do that between now and January 20th.
Now, that's what I would do if I was Trump.
I would bury everybody.
Iron Bank Global Effort 00:05:59
Yeah.
You know, I'd have the whole Anthony Weiner laptop up on the internet.
Baboon.
Right.
Bring it out.
He probably should have earlier.
Everyone, you're watching The Dark Journalist Show.
We're here with Catherine Austin Fitz.
Of course, at Solari.com, you can get the latest Solari report, which is the state of our currencies, which lays out exactly what they're doing with this whole smart cities and rigging up.
I just have to put in a plug.
I'm going to pick on this wonderful subscriber I was talking with last night.
They said, you know, I've really been dreading having to read State of Our Currency because I know it's going to be financial and dry and boring.
And I just don't want to read it.
It's really beautiful, but it's just like, oh, God, do I really have to read this?
But I knew I really had to read it because you kept asking me if I read it.
And you know something?
I could really understand it.
And it was really interesting.
And really, now I understand what these guys are up to.
Yeah.
I'm telling you, I spent a year, it's one of the most painful years of my life, trying to integrate all these different aspects from the real estate to space to China to the debt and show you both the challenge of keeping the dollar going and then the challenge of bringing in this new system.
And it's the single best explanation I know of what's really going on.
Now, it looks at it from the financial money side, and that's not the only way to look at it.
I don't want to, you know, I don't want to detract from the others, but money is a fabulous mapping tool.
And if you can understand, the central bankers are driving this train.
You know, it's just like Game of Thrones, where the Iron Bank is the ultimate power, right?
You know, they were trying to tell you something in Game of Thrones.
So the Iron Bank is running this.
I don't know if you've ever seen the, I said this the other day, I forget what show is.
I said, You know, because it's clear, Carson's and the Bank of International Settlements is right at the heart of this thing, and they're playing a major, very, very important role.
And if you've ever seen their building, what I said is, I said, Carson's and the board at the BIS need to understand if they're going to have a retail role, they need to get a new building because it does.
It looks like the Iron Bank.
It looks like the Iron Bank.
And no, from the time Game of Thrones published, you know, the BIS needed a new headquarters.
You watch, you watch, you watch.
Well, that's great.
So, if somebody looks out, this is interesting because this comes off the report too.
Because I was thinking this when I was reading it.
If somebody said, you know what, I think they're going into this like lockdown system, and I really want to get away from this, and I have some savings, and how could they translate the things that are going on in every situation's individual?
But what would be their move?
You know, would they figure out which state is the freest and move there and start their life there?
Would they get their own property so they could grow their own food?
Like, what is the level of individuals' action?
Here's the challenge.
We're looking at a global effort.
Right.
Okay.
And so it is impossible to tell where there are going to be incremental differences globally.
Yes.
Now, you're always better where there's plenty of food and water and communities of people that you can trust.
Yes.
Okay.
But what I found is that for each individual person or family, You know, the plan that I would come up with for this family is entirely different than this family.
Yes.
Okay.
And the most important thing for every family is to understand that this is highly uncertain and unpredictable, and you want to be able to rock and roll.
Now, the first thing I would do is I would stay as far away from the places where they desire real estate.
Okay.
So, if they're coming to take that land or real estate, That's probably not the best place to be because, as we've seen with the opportunity, I mean, check out the opportunity zones.
If you're in the middle of an opportunity zone, you might want to think about moving, including the moon.
Yes.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
The foresight of the moon.
So, well, you saw that in the news, trends, and stories.
I said one of our questions for the last quarter, and it'll be the same in the annual report, the annual wrap up is is the moon an opportunity zone?
Yeah, right.
Remember when I said the 21 trillion part of it's in an endowment?
I absolutely believe that they have figured out how to, the British offshore system has figured out how to create tax havens in the suborbital platform or on the moon.
Well, Vodafone and Nokia got a contract in 2008 to do a 4G network on the moon.
What's that about?
Yeah.
Well, but you can remember you're talking about one of the biggest challenges ahead is how do we create a legal framework for how we share, you know, certainly the suborbital platform, but the moon and beyond.
We're about to come out with a new update on our space law study.
Yes.
Well, you put out the original space report in 2015 when people weren't even really thinking about this.
And it's remarkable how ahead of the headlines that thing, that's over five years ago.
Did I ever tell you the FedEx story?
Yes, tell me.
So I'll tell you the whole thing because this is how I know I nailed it.
FedEx Story Nailed It 00:03:45
I worked so hard on that wrap up because.
You know, I had been trying for years to understand the space aspects of governance on planet Earth.
And I'd really struggled and I'd read hundreds of books and talked to many, many people.
Anyway, so I'm up in Rhode Island and we come, I finally get it.
And about a week before we publish, I said, okay, I've got it.
I've got it.
And I write it up and I'm so excited.
And I sit down the night that I'm ready to record the presentation and I'm pre recording.
I start and I'm up on like the 20th floor in this big hotel in Providence, and the drapes are closed.
It's this huge, it's like a suite.
And I start, I'm into like the fifth sentence, and suddenly, Daniel, there was a noise from right outside the window that was so from another world.
You know, I'm fearless.
It scared me down to my tippy toes, and I just froze.
And I got up and I threw the blinds back, expecting literally to see like a black helicopter or a spaceship.
There was nothing there, which was even more frightening.
Wow.
And anyway, so I won't bore you with the rest, but finally I go home, I drive back to Tennessee, I write the whole thing up, we get the graphic designers and everyone, and we finally get it done.
And we take it to the printer in California, and the guy who's leading, who's doing the project management on the magazine, he calls me and said, You're not going to believe this.
I said, What happened?
He said, The printing machine stopped and they can't figure out what's wrong.
It just stopped.
And so we can't print the magazine.
And Xerox is having to fly a technician out from Connecticut because no one can figure out what's the matter.
So they come out and no one can fix it.
They have no idea what's wrong with it.
So Xerox sends another machine.
So now we've waited four weeks to get it printed.
So finally, the new print machine comes.
They print it for a four week delay.
And so I say to our graphic designer, look, we're so far behind.
Can you just FedEx me 50 copies to get out quickly as advanced copies to people like you?
So he puts 50 in a FedEx box and then he puts the rest, the rest gets shipped by pallets.
Okay, 19 days later, the FedEx box never gets there.
19 days later, the FedEx box shows up back at his door with 34 copies gone.
Wow.
And he said, You don't understand this.
In my entire career, I've never seen anything like this.
This can't happen.
And I said, Well, it's a compliment.
At least this time they wanted physical copies.
The digital wasn't good enough.
Then the remaining load comes on pallets to UPS, and UPS in Jackson refuses to give them to us.
Weird.
And they refused to drive them out.
They said, We think it's going to snow, and we can't drive them out.
So I sent.
The head of operations with her husband in a pickup truck to go get them, and they refused to give them to her.
She called me and said, What do you do?
I said, Just tell me you're about to call the sheriff.
Call the sheriff.
And, you know, and that's we literally had to threaten calling the sheriff to get them out.
Unbelievable.
It was unbelievable.
Space Force Optical Illusion 00:10:05
And that's when I knew, Daniel, okay, you know, I figured it out.
I nailed it.
And when you touch the train tracks, those types of things happen.
Right.
So, yeah, we call it the third rail when you touch the third rail.
And it was fun because it was funny because I sent it to one ally and he, I said, what did you think?
And he said, you know, I was pretty upset reading it.
I said, why would you be upset?
I mean, you've listened to Coast to Coast for, you know, since Art Bell started it.
And he said, well, it's one thing to hear it in an entertainment venue, it's another thing to face.
That it's really true and it's driving your stock portfolio.
Because my whole effort was how do I integrate this with the financial side?
I've told you my favorite comment of the guy who used to trade in the City of London.
He showed up at a lunch we had in Amsterdam, this fabulously handsome Brit.
And I said, you know, how'd you get connected to Soleri?
And he said, well, I used to trade in the City of London and I could never figure out how the mining stocks and the elevator companies made so much money.
And then I read Space, here we go, and I realized, ah.
You were building the underground bases.
Yeah.
There's a whole invisible infrastructure there, and this is the thing.
What's fascinating to me is in relation to the UFO file part, because you've been able to open up a whole new dialogue about that way before any of the junk New York Times stuff.
By the way, when I was talking to Russell Targ, who's the father of the remote viewing program, he had looked at that tic tac video and decided that it wasn't anything like what they were describing it as, which I thought was very interesting.
What did he think it was?
He thought it was an optical illusion.
Really?
It was like, you know, I don't want to put words in his mouth, but the way he described it to me was, you know, he did all kinds of.
It was like a Hitler saloon.
Right, exactly.
And he's done all kinds of, you know, research and testing about things in space and in flight and where they are based on where you are in a plane and looking at them.
So he knows about these types of radar things.
And he said, you know, radar, he said, you're not even looking at a camera read.
That's actually a radar read.
That they blow up as this tic tac thing, complete junk, and the whole UFO world bought it.
But this is interesting to me because you opened up on this subject in venues where people didn't talk about it, like especially in the business world.
You didn't hear anything about UFOs.
So you opened up this whole vista and you started to report on it.
And it's almost like, again, being ahead of that curve, the mainstream media starts talking about it, but it's always a threat.
And then they get Marco Rubio, and he's in on it.
And then you get Chris Mellon from the Mellon banking family who used to work for W.
So these people get involved.
What is it that these people are doing around the UFO file?
Why is Marco Rubio talking about UFO threats?
I can't speak to any one of those, but I think the system is always trying to affirm its credibility.
So if the audience decides, okay, There's no intelligence to be gathered from the corporate media.
We're going to leave and go to independent media.
Then you need to dangle out some modified hangouts to bring them back.
Ah.
Okay.
So I think part of what we're watching is a competition between the corporate media to affirm their credibility and the independent media that's just leaving.
Right.
Right.
And so now part of this is a bifurcation between the cult and the people interested in the truth.
But as much as they can make it socially acceptable to come back in, to you know, because there's still a lot of people who don't want to just belong to a basically mind controlled cult.
You need the patina of science, you need the patina of facts, you need the patina of all those things.
So I'm assuming they're just trying to buy the audience back.
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
That makes a lot of sense.
And when we think about Trump in this regard, He did a lot of things, including creating the Space Force, which had not been done and is a whole new branch of the armed services.
We know from his background, with his uncle being deeply, deeply involved in technology and Tesla, and that he was the protege of Vannevar Bush, who, according to Robert Saarbacher, who was this major physicist at the time, said, Oh, Vannevar Bush ran the UFO file.
So we have John Trump as Vannevar Bush's protege, and then knowing about the X technology, he becomes close with Trump, not some distant relative, but actually somebody who he hung out with and spent time with.
And I realize some of this has to go into speculation, but when you look at Trump and you think of the tremendous push against Trump from inside that establishment, and I know that there are individual reasons, and they've been brought up.
But from the hidden technology angle and Trump's knowledge of it, does that make more sense to you when you look at that and you say, oh, he knows about that hidden technology and they know he knows and he's disturbing because of that and Space Force is disturbing.
We really need to get rid of this guy.
I don't know.
I look at Space Force a little bit differently because if I was the president of the United States, I would have done Space Force.
Yes.
In other words, If you're going to become a multi planetary civilization, you need the way to organize and galvanize all the different resources to share a common vision and to move into that vision.
And you can't just do that by Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk playing around.
Not to say that they don't, you know, so you can't do it all private.
It's got to be official.
And part of the challenge is the central bankers, if they're going to do a planetary central banking function, then they need the military to complement the.
The planetary central banking function.
And the trick is, how do you complement the central bank with a military?
Right.
How are you going to align those two?
Okay.
And there's no doubt that the Space Force, if you're Mattis and you're the Secretary of Defense and the defense establishment, the last thing you want to do is reorganize because reorganizing in Washington is a very expensive.
Expensive, painful process.
So, the establishment had hundreds of thousands of good reasons to not do Space Force.
I absolutely sympathize with their resistance.
At the same time, if you're Trump, you know you've got to have a vision that galvanizes and organizes people together.
And so, it's worth it in the short run to take the pain to do Space Force for the long run.
So, Trump did the right thing.
And I think there's enough sense in the establishment to know he did the right thing.
And it may have been they used Trump to get the right thing done because they know how painful it is.
So they used Trump to get the corporate taxes done.
They used Trump to get the military refunded.
They got Trump to do the Space Force.
Now, they may prefer to have Space Force someplace else so it complements with the central bank function.
That's, you know, so the question is he was renationalizing and that's what they didn't want.
But if they succeed with what they're up to, they can always move that elsewhere.
So, um, I think, from what I see, the establishment used Trump to get a whole series of strategic things done, including bringing down the US government.
He got the clouds in place.
So I think Trump served, you know, sort of served them well in terms of the important things they wanted to get done.
Absolutely.
And it's interesting because there were ways to maneuver with him there, like you're saying, put him to these tasks and Let him think, oh, he's launching Space Force, while all the time just using him as kind of a figurehead for these things?
Well, I think Trump, the challenge Trump had was you have an enormous political class who have not touched base with reality for decades.
And Trump made the mistake of introducing mathematics into their midst in a very painful way.
You know, he canceled the contract for the new Air Force One because he said, you know, we don't need $4 billion for a plane.
What's, you know, something's wrong here.
You know, Trump could count.
And he kept trying to, you know, so when COVID 19 came along, he said, this is a hoax.
Now, you know, look at how the pushback he got, even though he was right.
Fear Kills More Than Virus 00:02:27
Yes.
Right.
So, you know, not to say that there hasn't been real, you know, that hypoxia is not killing people, it is.
But there's definitely pathogens bopping around here and killing people.
But he's right, it's a hoax.
It's not a pandemic.
The only pandemic we have right now is fear and mind control.
Yes.
And it's funny, I have some wonderful subscribers who are healthcare, they're doctors or nurses.
And what I keep hearing from them is fear is harming more people's health and killing more people than anything else.
I mean, heart disease is still by far and away the number one killer.
And, you know, people are dying of a broken heart.
People are dying of the destruction of their businesses and income.
People are dying of fear.
I mean, that's what's frightening to watch is when you run into these people.
I know people who've told me they have relatives who have not left their apartments since March.
Incredible.
Right.
And they're terrified, they think they're going to die.
J.B. Hanley did a wonderful article.
He did a series called Lockdown Lunacy.
And he pointed out in one of them that a survey of Americans, and I think this was sometime this summer, a survey of Americans found that Americans thought COVID 19 had killed 9% of the population.
Daniel, that's 30 million people.
Right after J.B. Hanley published this was Lockdown Lunacy 3.0, the CDC came out and revised their numbers.
To, I think it was 9,583 deaths from COVID 19 only.
Yes.
Only.
Now, throughout America, I will talk to people and I say, Do you know anybody who's died of COVID 19?
And the answer is no.
And the rare instance I get yes, you dig down and they had, you know, they were all over 70 and they had massive comorbidities.
Right.
So, Trying to find somebody who knows somebody who really died of COVID 19.
I don't know.
Do you know anybody who's died of COVID 19?
Hopeless Search for Truth 00:14:10
No.
No.
Do you know anybody who knows somebody who's died of COVID 19?
No.
Now, how can we have a global pandemic and you sitting in the middle of Boston not know?
Yeah.
That's quite strange.
It's very strange.
And so much of it is railroaded through.
You know, it's interesting enough.
Naomi Wolf has been calling this out for a while.
And it's fascinating because she came in and she studied.
She said, Hey, lockdowns are completely unconstitutional.
As a matter of fact, even when they've had things like the Spanish flu, they didn't do that.
And there's no precedent for it at all.
And so she went and she was in the New York Times Twitter feed and she said, You're presenting information on numbers relating to this virus.
By the way, where are you getting the numbers from?
Show me one published study you're getting those numbers from.
And they, over and over again, they maneuver around her.
And so then she comes out and she says, You know, I'm really sorry that I voted for Biden.
I had no idea that he wanted to do lockdowns.
Those are unconstitutional.
Okay, that I can't believe because Naomi Wolf is a very intelligent woman.
One of my favorite videos of the last couple years is Naomi Wolf unpacking the New Green Deal.
It is historical.
I wrote her and I said, please come on the Sulayer Report, but she will never respond to me.
I'm way too, you know, I'm way too from Tennessee or something.
You know, and I talk about UFOs, so she can't, you know, that's not.
If you can't handle the truth, it's that line.
Well, no, but Naomi Wolf deserved a Pulitzer.
She just, I don't know, she deserved an Emmy Award for her presentation on the New Green Deal.
It was fantastic because she has serious experience in government and she's very intelligent and educated and ripped it to shreds.
Yeah.
So I love it when it comes in.
This is the same thing I get with Taibbi and with Greenwald.
They're on a totally different political tip.
You know, they come in from a democrat, a traditional democrat tip, and when they see this stuff going on, they're like, This is that has nothing to do with the democratic party or liberalism.
What on earth is this thing?
And this is the thing where we had Twitter blocking the president's tweets.
This is the whole Russia collusion thing.
It's a strange small group pretending to be a political party.
I mean, it's quite interesting.
This comes back to the Karl Rove comment.
You know, Glenn Greenwald and Matt Taibbi are interested in facts, which makes them, you know, which means they're going to get crosswise with the Empire.
Yeah.
Because if the Empire is creating this fictional reality, You know, they're going to have trouble.
Greenwald and Taibbi are going to have trouble fitting into the cult.
Yes.
Right.
They are.
And it's interesting because, you know, Professor Scott, who's certainly about as left as you can get in many ways with his work, but real left, you know, like traditional liberal, which is really care about humans.
Yes.
Not want to do post birth abortions.
Yes.
Right.
Right.
Exactly.
Right.
This is very interesting because he said, you know, it's really strange to me that they censored Greenwald's story on the Hunter Biden laptop, regardless of what you think of the laptop.
Why would they censor him in his own, you know, website?
And so now they're trying to win an election.
Yes.
Right.
They're trying to win an election.
They're trying to get Trump thrown out.
So.
But they're trying to change the political calculus.
So you have in the Senate and the White House somebody who's going to stop, they're going to protect the Second Amendment and they're going to protect the independent producers.
And you want to change those things.
So this is not about party.
It's about, you know, are you going to allow independent producers to have the ability to feed themselves, you know, close themselves, feed themselves, sorry, close themselves, feed themselves, you know, heat their houses, and basically own a gun to stop you from taking away their property.
Right.
Here's the reality I'm from rural Tennessee.
If Antifa and BLM come to rural Tennessee to try and burn people out of their houses, they're not going to succeed.
Right.
And you know why.
Yes.
Right.
Absolutely.
Right.
They've never put up with anything like that.
That's very fascinating.
Right.
They value their freedom.
And they're prepared to defend it.
But it's not just the people.
It's the, if you look at the governmental structures, right?
You know, you have intimate relationships between the city council, the mayor, the sheriff, the people, you know, and they converse and they communicate and they work together.
It's a very collaborative society and they have a lot of shared values.
It's the Bible Belt, you know.
They believe in the Ten Commandments.
They try.
They make a serious effort.
And so you're not just going to come there and show up as strangers from across state lines, finance from across state lines, and burn down their homes.
That's not going to happen.
Fascinating point.
When we look at this period of the election being up in the air and Trump is trying to force these recounts in different places, and the media is saying, Oh, it's all over, and we have a president elect, and we have Biden standing at a podium, and it says, President elect, office of president elect.
There is no office of president elect, interestingly enough.
But what I find interesting is when we look out at that, what is the most dangerous thing in your view for this period post election where they're still working out the election?
Here is the number one most dangerous thing.
John Rappaport said it best.
He said, hopelessness is an op and it's planet wide.
Ah.
Okay.
The whole goal of all of this stuff is to basically communicate to you look, Daniel, it's hopeless.
They have complete control and you must go along and obey.
You can't fight City Hall.
This is it.
You know, the nothing is on the move.
It's like, there's nothing you can do.
You know, I heard this for years during the litigation.
There's nothing you can do, it's entirely hopeless.
Just give up, lie down, go off into the woods and read for the rest of your life because there is nothing you can do, right?
And first of all, it's not hopeless.
But the second thing is, you know, I keep saying this again and again, I'm going to pound the table.
Death is not the worst thing that can happen.
Do not be afraid, okay?
You have no reason to fear death.
I realize it's inconvenient, particularly if somebody is depending on your cash flows.
But death is not the worst thing that can happen.
Spoken like a true investment advisor.
Right.
Slavery is the worst thing that can happen.
Yes.
So, you know, get out of fear.
It's not hopeless.
If it was hopeless, they wouldn't be trying to persuade you that it was hopeless.
Good point.
Excellent point.
Right.
But they're still putting out the narrative.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's just like, you know, I hate to say this.
You and I first met and bonded around They Live, right?
Yes.
Right.
So if you haven't seen They Live, you need to understand They Live.
Obey.
Obey.
And remember, the thing they're most afraid of is our imagination.
Is our power to create the future.
You know, go off into that quantum space and go up there into the future and invent that future.
A prayer is so, prayer is one of the most powerful tools we have because at the root, this is a spiritual war.
And so we're going to have to win this spiritually first and foremost.
And as you know, you know, my sort of prophecy on how this is going to work is the story of Gideon.
I have a wonderful Saleri report called The Story of Gideon where I go through the whole thing with Thomas Meyer, but.
You know, the story of Gideon is a story about how transparency totally shifts the whole thing.
And, you know, it's both transparency and raising things to a higher vibration.
So, how can we bring transparency?
And as we bring transparency, how can we shift towards, you know, coming up?
Because we do need a reset.
We absolutely need a reset.
So, how are we going to do a reset that brings us into a human civilization?
That's our challenge.
So turn on the lights and then roll up your sleeves and get to work on building a human civilization.
You know, and as many of the leaders as we can bring along to do that, you know, as far as I'm concerned, truth and reconciliation, you know, everybody's welcome.
Let's reinvest the 21 trillion over here and get to a human civilization.
Absolutely.
And you are making the point, really, that there's their global reset and there's We need to be clear about ours.
Right.
Right.
It's funny.
I just watched Schwab.
Yeah, Klaus Schwab.
Please tell me that Schwab is like a drone.
He can't really be for real.
Anyway, so I was watching Schwab at the new ECB forum.
Yes.
And he's talking about how we're going to create jobs.
Now, here's a guy who's part of a system which is doing everything they can to destroy every independent farm, every independent farm.
Producer, not because their technology makes them more efficient than we, okay?
But because they can engineer the federal credit mechanism to engage in criminal ways to destroy, you know.
So they're using taxpayer resources to destroy highly efficient, effective, independent.
So they're destroying millions of jobs all over the world, millions of jobs.
And he's sitting up there talking about how this green reset, you know, the green agenda is going to create jobs.
And it's really, Klaus, do you think that you, if you're destroying, I don't know, how many jobs is he destroying a day?
100,000, million, 10,000?
You know, because now we're talking global.
So if you're destroying, I just pick a number, 25,000 jobs a day, how many jobs are you going to create, Klaus?
And you think, you know, I said, I reviewed my book on Solari and I tried to be really nice about it.
But in his book, he's talking about how the riots have been inspired by George Floyd.
Yeah.
And I'm thinking, Klaus, don't you understand that the people watching the real estate acquisition plan in the Opportunity Zones don't you realize they know all the tech billionaires who are probably reinvesting at that were at your meeting in Davos?
Wow.
And they probably, and Soros, who's financing these Antifa armies, was at your Davos meeting.
So you got the financiers and the investors and the private equity groups all over Davos.
You know, and we know that we know they're there, and we know they probably discussed whatever the real estate acquisition plan was when they were all together in Davos.
Don't you want to be a little bit more careful and circumspect?
If I was your lawyer, I would tell you to be a little more careful.
I can think about it, right?
Think about it.
I mean, there's legal liability there.
I've been wondering with his kind of dumb, glib comments if he isn't trying to draw.
Some heat off of Gates and be like, look at me and make fun of me and let Gates go about his business.
Because it seems to me one thing they miscalculated with Gates when they presented him as the savior is just how much incredible negative pushback he got basically because of who he is, you know, and people realizing what he's up to.
But he was not a good front person for this operation.
So, you know, I think what they're trying to do with the World Economic Forum and their website is to.
Encourage the young people to get on board for this exciting agenda.
Right.
And I think that is basically what the World Economic Forum team was sort of designated to do.
Official History vs Reality 00:09:30
It's a way of marketing the reset to the non financial people, particularly the young people.
So I think they're trying to market to the young people.
What would you tell a young millennial who thinks that things like the Green New Deal and that are good for society?
How would you explain it to them that this other thing is going on?
So, I wrote a curriculum for my pastor.
He came in and he teaches high school, and he said, Could you write a curriculum for an economics course for my high school class?
And I said, I have no idea how to write a curriculum, but that never stopped me before.
So, I did.
I wrote one.
And basically, it was designed to teach a class of high school kids how all the money worked around them.
You know, so to start with their town and their county and to learn how the money worked around them.
It's up, if you just do a search for economics 101 at Soleri, it's in the library, it's not in the homepage.
And basically, what I would tell a young millennial to do is first of all, sit down, mathematics is a wonderful tool, and learn how the money works around you in your town, in your county, but do it in a way that looks for opportunities for you and your friends.
Because there are tremendous opportunities if you take the time.
It's a learning journey, it takes time, it's work.
But you can do it, especially now because the millennials are very tech savvy and there's lots of low cost GIS software.
You can map your place, you can use all these tools to help you.
And what I would say to them is once you've mastered your local area, what you need to know is.
The planet's a body, and your community is a molecule.
And if you can understand one molecule, it's pretty easy to scale up and understand the whole planet.
But what I would do is I would use mapping the money and resources as a tool to help you navigate your reality so that you don't get the first thing you got to do is you got to turn off your TV and do as much as you can to get away from the mind control because right now the war is for your mind.
And if you don't own and control your own mind, you're going to get totally.
You're going to get lost in the trance.
You're going to get lost in the cult.
You're going to get tricked.
And the greatest tool I know to stay out of the cult is math.
That's why I'm always mapping the money and the resources because they're not perfect and they're really bad at helping you with the UFO phenomena, which is why I always kind of shake my head.
Off planet does not lend itself to on planet finances.
But I would tell a millennial to get that bottom up mathematic understanding.
Of reality because it can help you navigate.
You will avoid so many mistakes.
No question.
Right.
Right.
Oh, it's great advice.
Catherine, just a couple of questions before we wrap up today.
And you've been very generous with your time.
Are we getting any questions here?
I'm watching that.
Somebody just said turn off your TV.
Turn off your TV.
You've heard me tell the story a lot.
When I was on Wall Street, it was 1984.
I'll never forget it.
I overheard a conversation I wasn't supposed to hear.
And it was two billionaire types talking about the entrainment technology they're going to roll out on TV, and it scared me to death.
And that was the end of me and TVs.
That was it.
Yeah.
Whatever they said must have been.
It's because if you don't have, you know, if you don't have your mind, you know, that the greatest gift you can have is you can have your own mind, you can have your own consciousness.
And you can have a mind that plugs you into the divine intelligence.
If you have access to the divine intelligence and you have integrity of mind, that's the greatest blessing you can ever have.
So incredible.
And we have the power, each one of us, to come to a place where we have both.
Absolutely.
I guess my last question for you today is.
Are we at war?
So we're at war, but the war is 10,000 years old.
Right.
Can you explain that?
So, whatever war we're in, first and foremost, it's a spiritual war, but it's been going on for a very, very long time.
That's the secrecy.
And we know that the official history, our official history, you know, we don't know our true history.
You know, you've had Graham Hancock on, you've explored history, you know, whatever's been going on in this planet for the last 10,000 years.
It's not only much deeper, but much more interesting than we've been led to believe.
Absolutely.
Right.
So, this is a very old war, and there's no doubt it's coming to a head.
And we're looking at the first potential global dictatorship that we know of.
I mean, I don't.
You know, if we go back to Atlantis, you wonder what that, you know, was that a global?
I don't know.
But this has been coming.
Tim Wu did a wonderful, wonderful book about the history of information technology.
And he described how every time a new innovation came along, there'd be this wonderful flourishing.
And then, wham, they'd use it to centralize.
And the flourishing, wham, then they'd centralize.
And they're finally approaching the point where they're trying to do the total central control.
Yes.
Yeah.
Yeah, absolutely.
And we're in that now.
And, you know, I was discussing some of the things with a friend of mine who's still kind of in that corporate America trance.
Right.
And she said, well, you know, there's always rich people.
It's go back to like Venice and, you know, go back to Greece.
There's always been these rich, powerful people trying to control other people and, you know, just kind of playing it off.
Like we'll get through it like we always do.
And I said, you know, you don't realize that those people didn't have this technology.
And that's really a big difference to saying, hey, the Romans used to really run things tight, too.
It's a really big difference.
Right, it is a really big difference.
So I don't think the Romans had this kind of physical force, but they didn't have this kind of invisible technology.
Yes.
And you've made the point over and over again that the main reason that slavery was discontinued was because.
They couldn't perfect collateral.
Now they can.
There you go.
You know, if you really study the history of slavery, it's unfortunately very informative and not really, you know, it's not a hopeful aspect because they've solved the problem that stopped the last time.
Yes.
Right.
And I have to tell you, my analysis of civilization to the extent that I've been able to understand it, our access reliable information.
Slavery is the single most profitable business on this planet.
Amazing.
Right.
And if you look at how profitable war is, war couldn't be achieved without slavery.
And it couldn't be achieved without secrecy.
And so, you know, slavery is a very financially profitable business if you can engineer it.
And this technology lets you engineer it on scale.
And we have to kind of realize that that leadership class.
In the UK, in America, in China, they believe in slavery.
Right.
Right.
And, you know, part of it is, you know, if you can do it, you know, we do it because we can.
Yes.
Right.
I mean, look at your friend.
She's saying, oh, well, okay, this is all acceptable.
Yes.
Right.
Yeah, and I'm sure, I think we all have a friend who's like this who is a great person, but is stuck in that loop where they can't, they almost lean outside of it, but they're so comfortable with the track that they're on that they don't want to get off of that.
Well, I've been over and over again.
Victory Taken Away Systemically 00:05:26
Let me ask you a question.
Let's go back to they live.
If we could turn off the transmitter, would they change their mind?
Yes.
I think if they could turn off the transmitter, they'd change their mind.
Right.
So, how do we find the transmitter?
How do we find it and turn it off?
It's funny.
I have a subscriber who used to be a rocket engineer.
And she worked for a rocket startup when she first came out of engineering.
And she finally, one night, she asked the guy who started the company, Why, you know, what's your goal?
He said, I want to deliver a payload of sand to the suborbital platform.
And she said, Why?
And he wouldn't answer the question.
I know why.
So that it would become an inhospitable environment for satellites.
Oh, interesting.
Right.
So the control grid could not go into place.
He was a freedom fighter.
You know, it's amazing.
When you go back and you look into the history of people looking at this and kind of the early versions of WikiLeaks, you know, like the Torbitt document or May Brussels and those types of people, they all understood that the space technology grid was part of it.
They didn't have the details that we have now, but they knew that space was going to be majorly.
A piece of this because of the amount of secrecy around it.
Right.
Right.
Phenomenal.
Well, the question always is that you have to ask yourself what killed Kennedy?
You know, was he killed because he didn't want the Israelis to have a nuclear arsenal?
Was he killed because he wanted the central bank, he wanted Treasury to be able to issue the currency?
Was he killed because he wanted to stop the Vietnam War?
Or was he killed because those three and 20 other things basically pissed off everybody?
And it's amazing that we're coming up.
Everybody on the third rail.
Right.
Right.
Oh, the other one was he told Dulles, well, he fired Dulles, but before he fired Dulles, he told Dulles he didn't want taxpayer money financing the sex slave.
Right.
And you know that got him in huge trouble.
Yeah, right.
Well, it's amazing with Kennedy because the 57th anniversary of his assassination is coming up.
And here we are.
Trump still hasn't let the documents out.
Exactly.
This is something he could do, which would completely embarrass the CIA and open that whole system up.
He has the key.
Right.
Interestingly enough.
And, you know, his supporters, the millions and millions of them, who really look like they delivered a very hefty victory, even though it's been.
Tampered with, those supporters believe that Trump is the person who will come forward and do something like that.
He's come up to that precipice and he has shown a lot of courage in different ways, but he hasn't ever gone over that edge.
Because, you know, I've always told you this the Secret Service guns turn outward and they turn inward.
So remember when we seen the motor on his helicopter, his family helicopter go with his.
Kids and grandkids in it.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So, you know, you're in a position, but your powers are scripted.
He got rid of the Secret Service agent associated with that trip.
Yeah.
Somebody needed to pay for that one.
No question.
Yeah.
Absolutely.
What's interesting about what you just brought up there, though, if we look at Trump and his position in all this now.
Where do you see him going in this?
Do you think he will move to do these things because he can now and he realizes the system has taken a victory away from him?
I don't know.
Potentially?
I don't know.
So, Brennan, so let's say that Trump is not successful in the courts.
Right.
And so the states certify Biden and not Trump.
At that point, he can do a lot before January 20th or not.
And I don't think Brennan and Clapper can stop him from doing whatever it is he wants to do.
I think that he will be more scripted because when he comes out, he runs the risk of having to spend the rest of his fortune and the rest of his life fighting all sorts of civil and criminal litigation.
And so the question is will Trump make a deal?
And will he be able to make a deal?
Pulling Country Apart Strategically 00:03:24
I don't know.
So, it's going to come down to what does he think he can do without putting his family at risk?
And then what does he want to do given the deals he can make on coming out?
And they may just be scorched earth.
They just may decide they've got to make an example of Trump in front of everybody.
And a lot of it will be determined not what do they want to do with Trump, but how do they pull the country apart?
So, they may have a role for Trump post administration.
In helping to pull the country apart.
You know, so they help him start a media empire and he proceeds to help pull the country apart.
Who knows?
I think it's the thing to understand about what's going on is that we have never in my life seen things as fluid.
When the central bankers go into the invention room to reinvent something, I mean, to do something on this scale, we are living in a world of complete uncertainty.
And you have a lot of different factions.
The process is very organic and they're making it up as they go.
And there's one thing we're all going to have to do.
We're going to have to get good at scenario planning and we're going to have to be good at uncertainty.
And if anybody tries to give you uncertainty, one of the greatest ways to defraud people is to offer them certainty.
Oh, this is going to happen.
And if you just buy this, you'll be okay when that happens.
You know, don't believe it.
Right.
One of the problems I try and impress on people when they say, okay, I want to leave California.
I want to go to a state that has more vaccine exemptions and where it's safer and blah, blah, blah, blah.
You know, what I tell them is you have in your mind that you live here and now you're going to move and live here.
You need to think in terms of being able to rock and roll because you have, before this is over, you may have to move 10 times.
Yes.
You need to be prepared.
There's this great scene in World War Z where Brad Pitt says, movement is life.
You know, when you get into a world that's like this, you need to be able to move, you need to be able to rock and roll.
That's why I get so frustrated when people because I set my home in Tennessee up to be a base camp, not a home, it's a base camp because I knew I would never be able to put down roots again.
That was the nature of my environment.
I had to be able to get up and move.
Well, part of it is if you're building a global network, you have to.
You know, you have to move around.
But the other thing is, you know, if I'm going to tell the truth, I have to be prepared to get up and move.
That's just the way it is.
So we are in a world of uncertainty.
You need to embrace uncertainty and you need to find a way to get out of fear and get into love.
And it's tricky because it's a dangerous environment.
There's real serious dangers.
There are economic, serious dangers.
There are dangers of food.
There are dangers of safety and security.
You know, don't worry about the magic virus.
Embracing Uncertainty and Love 00:06:23
Worry about, you know, the guy next door who's going to snitch.
Somebody just sent me a guy on Twitter who posted a picture of the Franklin, Tennessee website.
They had a form where you could come in and snitch on your neighbors for not wearing their proper mask.
And yeah, you took one look at it.
I said, okay, property values just went down 1% in Franklin over just this.
You know, he posted it, it circulated it, and then the town took it down and he came back on and he said, This is why we have to do this because, yeah, yeah, you know, really bad idea.
That's your children anymore.
Well, it's Stasi.
Yeah, yeah.
You know, it's Stasi, and they're going to play a Stasi game.
If you look at what they're.
I did an interview with Mary Holland on contract tracing, and that's why I say to everybody you have to homeschool.
You cannot put your children in a government school if you look at what's coming on contact tracing and.
And these injections, it's not safe.
You know, and it's funny because I've yelled at parents who said, Well, my kids had to go to school on Zoom.
I said, You know something?
They're being watched.
Yes.
They're being watched, a file's being made.
You can think of that as an auction market.
You just put your child up in an auction market.
Is that really what you want?
Incredible.
Homeschool.
No question.
You've been ringing that bell for a long time on homeschooling, and now it's really.
Coming to fruition.
And I noticed that the Rudolph Steiner schools are under attack because they don't like to buy into all of the vaccine propaganda.
You know, as much as they're careful about it, they're not, you know, Steiner has a very solid kind of understanding of nature.
And those people look at this and they're very well educated, they're very well funded.
They're not easy to push around.
So I'm going to say something.
I wrote an article called The Injection Fraud.
I don't know if you read it.
Yes.
So, I discovered the problems with these injections from being an investment advisor.
I had many families come to me that had been financially harmed by fraud, financial fraud, and healthcare fraud.
The most expensive, the most horrible was vaccine injury.
Wow.
There was a mother in the first Vax film who estimated that a heavily vaccine injured child would cost you $5 million present value over a lifetime.
And the question was who was going to pay, the government or the family, you know, but that's what it was going to cost you.
And in my experience, I found that to be a reasonable figure for somebody who was seriously damaged.
And so when you think about whether or not you're going to get any ejection, whether it's the current schedule or whatever they're coming up with, because these are highly experimental, you know, and they're pretty frightening.
They're more frightening than a lot of the ones that we've seen so far.
You know, the question you need to ask is if you are going to inject poisons and heavy metals into your child's body, that could cause serious neurological damage.
And that means you're going to have to come up, in the worst case, with $5 million to care for that child.
That is a major financial risk that you're incurring, and you need to think about it.
You need to take it very, very seriously because most people don't have five million dollars exactly.
And in this environment, what it takes to earn five million dollars is pretty frightening, absolutely.
And it can completely demolish a family's finances from that.
Well, it does more than it destroys their future, it destroys you know, it causes divorce, it destroys the future of the siblings as well as the child who's been damaged.
Right?
When you study what it does, you know, I used to get in fights with grandparents, clients who had grandchildren, and they would say, It's my child's decision.
It's none of my business.
I said, It's every bit your business.
You have the $5 million and your child doesn't.
Do you want your $5 million to go to build a successful family through the generations?
Or do you want your personal fortune that you worked your entire life to build used to basically support a vaccine damaged child?
Is that really what you want?
Well, when you see, you know, I hate to keep coming back to the money, but when you see the financial implications of vaccine injury, you would not, you know, there are two things that I think will really sober a family about this.
One is to understand the financial implications, the other is to read the inserts.
Yes, which are not easy to get at.
Yeah, but you can get the, I mean, the doctor has to give you the insert if you ask.
And, you know, if I dare anybody to read one of those inserts and then to let this stuff be put, you know, you're basically allowing your child to be poisoned.
And you've mentioned it as the great poisoning.
This is where they're at with it.
And, you know, I had a conversation with RFK Jr. speaking about his different initiatives with Children's Health Defense.
And one of the major points he put across is look, they have 300 in the pipeline.
Never mind what we're talking about, they've got another 300 different versions in the pipeline, so they're already ready, they're past the original thing.
That's where their projections are going.
You know, here's the thing you've got this treadmill that's addicted to making money from sticking poisons into people's bodies.
I don't know what the strategic goal is.
Judas Goat in the Room 00:03:25
Um, you know, I believe that the guys at the top.
They truly want transhumanism.
They're trying to figure out how to install an operating system in a human body that can hook you up to the cloud.
Right.
You know, and do all the various things they want to do.
I mean, they've got people on this side and robots on this side, and they're just trying to figure out all the combinations and which works best for what and how many they want.
I mean, it really is a livestock management approach at the very top.
So, and that's, of course, the question when you watch all these different people who in these different lines are implementing it's like, Why would you want to be, you know, the head guy for livestock?
It's like the Judas Goat who walks everybody into the slaughterhouse.
Why would you want to be the Judas Goat?
Why are you doing this?
Yeah.
Well, it's like Mangala 2.0, really high tech version.
Anything else?
I don't know.
This has always been the baffling mystery for me.
And this is what I tried to write about in the William Diefenberger article.
You know, when I started to get booted out of the establishment, I had a Rolodex of 500 of the most successful people in America.
You know, and it never occurred to me that all of them would go along with this.
And essentially, almost everybody did.
And why?
It's a mystery.
Yeah.
Why, you know, I don't, you know, Daniel, I've never understood it.
It's almost like there's some sword of Damocles hanging over them if they do not.
Well, here's the thing we are herd animals, we want to be included.
I'll never forget at one point when I was at Dylan Reed, I, uh, I was able to engineer a sort of rapid ascension for one of the guys who worked for me and been very loyal and was very good.
And so he made it to vice president very quickly.
And you could tell he thought, okay, once I'm a vice president, I'll really feel like I'm in the club.
And about a month after I'd gotten him engineered, and it was a big deal, you know, everybody in the firm at his rank was very jealous and it was a big deal that he'd made it and blah, blah, blah.
And he knocks on my office one day, this big corner office on the All glass looking over Madison Avenue.
He knocks on my door and he says, Can I talk to you?
And he comes in and he says, I said, What?
Sure, what?
He said, I have this real problem.
I said, What's that?
And he says, I don't feel like a vice president.
And what he was saying is, You know, I'm trying to get in the club, but I don't feel anything, nothing's different.
And he said, What should I do?
I said, Don't worry about it.
Just go back to your office and go back to work.
And what I was trying to tell them is we have to create our own club.
In other words, you know, there's no, everybody's trying to get in the club and in the center of the circle, you know, and in the room.
There's this great song in Hamilton, you know, The Room Where It Happens.
I want to be in the room where it happens.
Everybody wants to be in the room where it happens.
Creating Our Own Club 00:16:05
And they don't seem to understand that, you know, that's something.
You have to create yourself.
Right.
You know, I'm the inventor of my own club.
That's why in the Salier Report, I keep saying, don't ask if there's a conspiracy.
If you're not in one, you need to start one.
No, but that's conspiracies are how you invent your future.
You know, you invent a plan, you get co conspirators, and then you proceed.
Right.
Right.
And so if you look at, you know, essentially what's being built here, Is an intelligence network, right?
Right.
Larry, Giza Death Star, No More Fake News, Dark Journalists.
We've got all these just little nodes on the network and we're building an intelligence network.
So we're online with everybody and we're trying to figure out what in the heck is going on.
You know, and the reality is we're not all sure, but we each bring our puzzle, our jigsaw puzzle pieces, and we put them down and we play around with them and, you know, and we get more intelligent.
That's what we're doing.
So it's an intelligence network for us.
And the intelligence part is the key.
The love part is the key.
Right.
Right.
The love part is the.
Entertainment, news, and intelligence.
The love is the, you know, the love keeps us going down the tracks and the intelligence keeps us on the tracks.
Right.
Right.
Catherine, unbelievable.
And what we're heading into here with the resolution of this really bizarre, and I mean, super bizarre election, and all the crazy COVID.
You know, Biden with a mask walking around all the time in this ridiculous pose, and Andrew Cuomo writing a book about how brave he has been leading New York City.
Here's what I want everybody to do the first thing I want you to do is if you want to help out, make sure the Republicans win Georgia.
Yes.
Because then we have a chance of holding the Second Amendment and stopping a lot of really crazy stuff.
Okay.
So you want to make sure that they hold.
I just, Authorized a donation to one of the senators and the Republican candidates in Georgia because I just don't want to see a Democratic Senate.
Okay, so that's the first thing you can do.
The next thing you need to worry about is who's your sheriff, who's on your city council, what are they up to, what are the budgets and finances because major state and local budget cuts are coming.
COVID 19 has wrecked those budgets.
They have accumulated half a trillion dollar deficit.
If we go into more big lockdowns in the beginning of next year, That deficits are going to get worse.
You need to understand what's going on financially at your state and local government, what it means to you, and what you and your neighbors can do to get together and make sure you're okay.
Some people may decide to get the heck out of wherever they are, particularly if you're in a place with a heavy spring.
I get a lot of complaints from California subscribers about really super heavy spring.
So if that's the case, maybe you want to move to a jurisdiction that is.
We just did a great salary report on state and local government.
Bill Bergman and Truth and Accounting just published a new big report on the finances.
And there's no doubt you have a better shot in state and local governments where the financial situation is strong.
Right.
So pay attention locally.
The number one thing you need to pay attention to is where are you going to get fresh food?
Okay.
Right.
If you come into the Solari Report, we have a great, this week, we have a food series with Pete Kennedy, who is one of the litigators who built the Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund.
A new great interview, very long, very detailed, with a transcript with a woman in Maine who put together all the local ordinances that stopped any kind of central control through the regulation and really allowed farmers to flourish.
So, you need to get out there and meet your sheriff, and you need to get out there and meet your local farmers and make sure you have a local, fresh food system that you can trust from people that you know and can trust.
So, stop worrying about the presidential election and start worrying about.
Yes.
Right.
Absolutely.
And you've made this point too that people need new sources of media, that these sources of media just, you can't be watching any of the mainstream channels.
You're not going to get anything useful.
So you're really going to have to pick your spots and find it in independent media where you're getting the truth and get behind those channels and get behind that information.
So I would say it another way.
You need to get totally radical in every aspect of your life on only having in your life.
People in institutions of integrity.
Your farmer, your bank, your media, everything.
You do not have enough time.
You know, I'm always having fights with people who try and get me to watch things which I consider to be fear porn, hope porn, disinformation, but it's very entertaining.
And they come in and I say, no.
You know, I do not have enough time to watch everything I want to.
You know, I'm still trying to finish the X series.
I don't have time for disinformation.
I don't have time for unreliable sources when the people of integrity who've got really good stuff, I can't even finish that.
I got like five books on my shelf from Aristotle.
I want to finish them.
You know, I don't have time for.
BS.
So, great point, too.
So, we have an article at Slurry called Coming Clean, and it just walks you through the steps.
But you need to make a list of everything in your life that is not in integrity.
And if you can get it out, get it out.
And that means you're going to have to let go of colleagues, friends, family.
They're dangerous.
You know, do not let in your life a person who's going to see you as an opportunity to make money from snitching.
Right.
Right.
Yeah.
Get it out.
So it absolutely applies to media, but it applies to every other aspect of your life.
There has to be a kind of new realism about dealing with the new set of circumstances that they've laid out.
So I used to have a wonderful ally who would say, when in doubt, increase your inner snobbery.
That's great.
I like it.
It's right on point.
Right.
It's just amazing.
I got to tell you this that the night of the election night, I had so many people contacting me that night, just before it and right after it, asking me, What does Catherine think about what's going on with this election?
You have to talk to Catherine.
And we had just done an interview series too, and I wanted to be back soon anyway.
So I was like, That's fine with me.
But a pack of email from that.
I mean, they really needed to hear this today.
And so I'm so glad that you were able to be here and do this because it's crucial.
And I feel like there's a big interface going on here about which way we're going to go.
Especially in America, but certainly the world.
And we're at that crossroads, and people are trying to tune into it here to find out which one of those forks in the road we can take.
So, I don't know what's going to happen at the federal level.
So, I just don't know how good a case the president has.
I just don't know.
It's a tough road because you've got multiple states and it's complicated information.
And you have all the money in the planet trying to get you to quit and give up.
And you have a lot of people trying to, you know, we even have Republican senators saying we want Biden briefed on intelligence.
So you've got plenty of people in your own party trying to pull the rug.
So, I think what we need to do is we need to simply, you know, this is one of the things where we need to just simply pray and watch because this is for the inside players to work and figure out.
But the fraud is very bad.
And the thing we can probably assume is that fraud in the election process is going to continue.
Absolutely.
Right.
No question.
And it's amazing that the media, the way they're discussing it now, they're like, there's no voter fraud.
The Department of Homeland Security just said this was the most, you know, safest election ever.
So, we should do a show on take action.
And all the, because there are many different actions we can all take, but they all start with bottom up getting mastery of how the money works in your place.
Yes.
Because you're going to have to take action on the cash flows.
If you're paying taxes, this is taxation without representation.
This is what started America.
This is the Tea Party.
So, we're paying taxes.
And it's funding schools we can't use.
It's funding healthcare officers who are poisoning us, et cetera, et cetera.
We're financing the people who are trying to kill us.
So, how are we going to deal with the taxation without representation?
And that gets back to the money, but it starts bottom up.
So, you've got to get intellectual mastery of how the money works around you, and you've got to get into cahoots with all the government officials in your town, in your county, in your state.
That's a big change for most people because most of us have just wasted a huge amount of time.
Watching the presidential election and eating popcorn.
And don't get me started on QAnon because I'll really irritate some people.
No, QAnon is out there pushing the whole transhumanist agenda.
Yeah.
It's unbelievable.
You know, and QAnon has managed to keep a lot of patriots on the couch as opposed to out there talking to the sheriff or building a local food system.
Right.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah.
Right.
That phenomena from a variety of different points.
And it's interesting because it has a tendency to swallow up good people.
I know.
And that's unfortunate.
Well, if I can keep everybody on the couch and away from the third rail, that's how I win.
And it worked.
Yeah.
I don't know.
I've, you know, I started the Saliri Report in 2008.
And I've watched hope porn and fear porn steal and decimate.
So many people, and it's you know, every time it happens, I try and try and try to explain why it's not a good use of people's time, but they find it enormously entertaining.
Well, from the Iraqi Dinar to the Blue Chicken Cult, we've seen them all go right through these different interviews.
The Blue Chicken Cult takes the cake.
I don't know if you ever saw my, when I got, I really got a head of steam up about the Blue Chicken Colt.
And I started getting on Twitter and saying, I want you to call Fidelity and ask them why they're financing the Blue Chicken Colt.
I want you to call Vanguard and ask them why they're financing, call BlackRock and ask them why they're financing the Blue Chicken Colt.
Do you think it has anything to do with the fact that they're the largest investors in U.S. Treasuries?
I really thought Twitter was going to shut me down and they didn't.
To this day, I thought maybe they might not have understood and been able to connect the dots.
You know, call JPMorgan Chase.
Why are they financing the Blue Chicken Cult?
The one that was amazing to me was I'll never forget.
I was, I think I was on a plane going to Switzerland or something when, remember when we were all talking about the Blue Chicken Cult?
It was you and Joseph and me.
So I got all the proxies because I wanted to see, okay, who's financing the Blue Chicken Cult?
And I realized that the firm in Chicago, which is run, she's number one or number two, it's run by Lucas, George Lucas's wife.
Right.
Fabulous.
We have George Lucas's wife financing the Blue Chicken Cult.
Wow.
Wow.
I know.
I was like, whoa.
My favorite thing that they ever did was they circulated this picture of a really butch Air Force guy.
And they were like, dark journalist is in the Air Force.
He's a secret Air Force agent.
And they had this guy, his shoulders were like twice as big as I am.
And I was like, this is really interesting that they're doing this.
This is a new one.
But yeah, they, you know, it is interesting.
After the 2014 secret space program, there was an amazing energy that came together around that.
And the serious research was beginning to really flow.
And then the blue chicken cult came in and took it all away.
It was a big one.
They bumcocked it.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
And it worked.
It absolutely worked.
It absolutely worked.
You know, they tried to buy Feral.
That didn't work.
And they sent some guy from the Navy after me.
He went after Feral, too.
That didn't work.
Yeah, right.
Right.
I mean, that is interesting, though, because when you really think about the secret space program research from the conference that we did in 2015, those people, you know, yourself, Farrell, Linda Howe, Jim Mars was there for that.
This is, it's a totally different kind of brain trust, insight, you know, wide angle lens to look at these things through.
They far prefer on the secrecy side to have like a contact in the desert woo woo fest thing.
Yeah, but you're trying to move it out of intelligence and into entertainment.
Yes.
That's always their tactic.
The Blue Chicken Cult was designed to take all that energy and move it out of intelligence into entertainment.
And again, I have no objection to entertainment.
I love entertainment, it's not a problem.
But there's nothing I love more than watching Matt Damon walk around on Mars and in the movie.
But they always try and do that move it out of intelligence and into entertainment.
No question about it.
And the inner earth princesses were just waiting to give the intel to the blue chicken cult.
It's good because you got it.
They saved the world from the Dracos, don't you know?
Oh, God.
Cabal arrests are right around the corner.
Catherine, it's great to see you.
You have been incredibly generous with all of us, and I can't even believe what a gift it is to have you here today.
You know, you and I have been talking for four hours and 29 minutes.
Do you realize that?
Inner Earth Princesses Intel 00:07:28
And we've only just got started.
Look at this guy.
I know.
I know.
The new Solari report is State of Our Currencies.
This lays out the vision.
They can get that.
Anyone can get that by going to Solari.com.
And you can become a member of Solari when you're there and get access.
I should say, you know, that's out in a hard copy.
We're just going to the printer with the second quarter 2020 wrap up, which is the injection fraud.
And we just published Visions of Freedom.
Those will be coming out in hard copy before the end of the year.
And there's more, you know.
I'm grappling now.
Are you ready for this?
You know, I did Deep State Tactics in 12 sections.
Yes.
And I'm grappling with how I'm going to produce that in a magazine form.
Fantastic.
Well, I finally decided I think what I'm going to do is make the whole annual wrap up, the whole Deep State wrap up, a PDF, but then just take the Deep State and instead of cutting it way down the transcripts in combination, Or 650 pages.
So I think what we're just going to do is we're just going to make a book because it was wild.
It was just me walking through all the tactics.
And it was, it turned out to be so much more useful to the subscribers.
You know, a lot of them are dealing with these tactics, but they don't realize that it's really engineered and intentional.
And of course, now with the COVID cult, it's just going on steroids.
Oh, forget it.
This is the book that I want because those things all together, I've seen so many of those tactics.
And, you know, I'm going to ask you to mention this, which is that strange.
When you were traveling and you had this weird photographer showing up, That's a very interesting.
Well, that happens.
That happens.
That hasn't.
I think you're talking about when it happened in Trento.
Yes.
Because I decided to take a picture of him and publish it right away.
And I didn't get the picture fast enough, but I got a stock photograph that looked remarkably like him.
And I wrote an article.
I published an article about him because he was not very subtle.
And then, you know, the next day, so I did that.
And somebody clearly got irritated because the next day I'm walking.
We are walking through the middle of, no, it was Verona.
It was Verona.
So we're walking through the middle of Verona and we're on our way to the cathedral for the organ concert.
And the phone rings and it's my banker from National Bank of Malvern.
And she says, I know it wasn't you who just charged $500 at Disney, Paris Disney World.
Because they know me and they know that's not me.
And I said, You're right.
I didn't.
Shut the card down and send me a new one.
Wow.
So they got me back.
So that night I got to the hotel and I wrote that one up and published it.
Wow.
And yeah, it was.
Well, people need to understand that contracting world, you know, because it's interesting because contractors are kind of like freelancers for the intelligence agencies.
So you don't even need to be dealing with the frontline CIA guys.
They're just these contractors.
I'm sure this guy was a local guy who just does odd jobs.
And I'm sure he wasn't working for the CIA.
He would be working for a subcontractor.
Who's working for another contractor?
So there's like four degrees of separation between him and the agency or whoever it was.
It was the same.
But you, it's interesting with you because you've stood face to face with James Woolsey, the CIA director.
So you understand all the different levels.
I guess what's really funny, because this happened to me in Denmark in March 2019, that was hysterical.
But all my friends who've sort of been with me when that happens, they can't believe it.
They're like, Oh my God, you know, we're being followed.
And, you know, it's like Spy World.
And, you know, and they find it very fun.
You know, it's like, whoa, you know, let's have some fun with this.
And, you know, I've had a couple of friends who turn around and go approach the people who are following us.
And they feel like, oh, wow, we're in an iSpy movie because it's never happened to them before.
So they say, oh, we love hanging around with Catherine because then we can play iSpy.
It's like the new status.
Oh, we were followed.
You know, there are certain corners of the independent media that would love to be followed.
That's the thing.
Well, here's what happened.
What happened to me in Denmark?
Thomas Meyer was going up to give a speech in Denmark, and I wanted to go with him because I'd never been to Denmark, and I don't like to go to a new country unless I have a contact or somebody locally who can sort of help me around.
So I said, Look, can I follow you up to Denmark and I'll just stay another day because all my life I've wanted to see the little mermaid.
I really want to see the little mermaid.
And so we get up there, and the first day, Thomas wants to go show me a whole bunch of art at the National Museum.
So I love to go look at the art collection.
So we go and we're followed.
We're followed by this young woman.
She's clearly still, if she's not still in the training program, she just graduated.
And she's wearing a black bowler hat because if you You know, like the one Joseph's wearing, because then you'll remember the hat, not her face.
Right.
So she's following us around the museum, trying to act like she's just, you know, looking at the museum.
But Thomas can't remember where the exhibits are.
He wants to show me.
So he keeps changing direction and doubling back.
Well, she almost has a nervous breakdown.
And it becomes so obvious.
I almost walked up to her and said, Would you like to come with us?
Because we feel really badly about how ridiculous we're making you feel here.
It was so many more things happened.
I won't bore you with the details, but I literally, I literally, well, it got so bad.
I had a team across from me in the hotel, you know, sort of walking and following me.
Thomas went on with his group, and I was going to stay back to see the Little Mermaid.
And once I realized these guys were following me, I just thought, you know, if I go see the Little Mermaid with these spooks on my tail, It'll ruin the little mermaid for me, and so I'm not gonna go.
I'm just you know, I'm never gonna see the little mermaid, I'll just look at the pictures.
You know, it's kind of sad.
I'm sitting in my room just working because I gave up on trying to, you know, to do sightseeing with the spooks.
And um, I get a message from Swissair saying, Oh, we have to change your seat, and then I get another message an hour later saying, We have to change your flight, and then I get another message an hour later saying, We're canceling your fight.
And then I get another message saying, We're booking you through Stuttgart to fly back to Zurich.
Now, if you know how Europe works, that's a little bit like flying you to Baltimore to go to Washington, you know, and change planes in Baltimore to fly to Washington.
Shifting Lifestyle to Safety 00:08:37
Yeah.
So, so I looked at that.
Now, Stuttgart is the head of NATO Europe.
Yes.
And I said, You know something?
I'm not doing that.
So I booked a ticket on KLM to take me to Geneva because I was going to Luzerne.
And, um, I just said, you know, and it took weeks of food fighting with Swissair to get my money back.
But I don't know what was going to happen to me in Stuttgart.
I can only imagine.
Anyway, and so I got to Geneva and I said, you know, the one thing I will never do is I will never go to Denmark again.
And I've been warned that it's just basically a subsidiary of the United States military.
But, you know, they were the ones who were working on the chip system for Ripple.
So, you know, I have no idea what that was about.
But all I can say is, Thomas Meyer to this day tells wonderful stories of, oh, I love going to museums with Catherine because we're followed.
And it's, I get to play I Spy and it's fun.
Maybe they're worried that you're going to discover something Steiner oriented and they're keeping an eye on you.
You know, a lot of times I think these people are just training.
You know, they've got lots of young people and they, you know, here's the thing they have a war on terrorism without any terrorists.
True.
So, how are you going to keep all these young people busy or trained?
I was the target of a training op in Philadelphia on the Schuylkill River.
And it was the funniest thing I'd ever seen.
And I just kept doubling back and making a huge, because they had a senior guy, but they had a whole bunch of young people.
And they were following me, and I was the target.
And it was the funniest thing.
I thought, what do you people think?
I don't know.
I think they have them watch these movies.
You know, about terrorism.
And they have these movies in their head.
And they can't connect with reality.
I mean, it took me a long time to learn how to deal with being under surveillance when I was during litigation, because it rarely happens to me now.
And I'm telling you some of the times, but I don't live with it the way I did during litigation.
And I used to have so much fun.
I used to always, if you look at where I lived, I used to double back and come back behind the guy who was following me and give him a candy, and they'd freak out.
We had one guy who came by me in a bicycle and he was always following me, same guy, so I knew who he was.
And he came by and he was leaning over to try and hear what I was saying, and his bicycle tipped over.
And I and another guy had to help him up and help him with his bicycle.
And he was thinking, you know, how is he going to get out of explaining this in his report?
You could see he was scared to death.
So you always try and bring.
You know, you always try and bring it back to an intimate human because most of these people are just paid to do a job.
And they're, you know, they're, they're, a lot of them are really good people.
They went into government because they wanted to, you know, make the world safe from organized crime.
And the next thing they know, you know, they're having to follow me around.
And it's pretty funny.
Well, I remember Professor Scott's story when he was being followed and he had all this surveillance on him.
He wondered what was going on.
And he said, you know, what I learned was that the contracting agency that was billing the CIA basically, it's their job to find something wrong where there isn't anything wrong so they can keep billing the CIA more and more.
That's very disturbing.
It's a huge job program.
It was very interesting because I finally figured out in Washington that they had, you know, I could tell from the way the surveillance is working that they were on cost plus contracts.
And so what I realized is, okay.
The way to deal with this is to shift my lifestyle from living in a house in Washington to living between four different places on an unpredictable schedule so that they will have to get a contract authorization to do setups and monitoring of all four places.
And so I chose the places I moved to and the unpredictability of my schedule to completely blow their budget because I knew they couldn't get a contract authorization, a reauthorization.
So I was trying to basically.
Increase the expense of doing the surveillance by a multiple of four, but also, you know, create a contract reauthorization proposal that would be rejected.
Because at that point, the big efforts to frame us had failed.
And so we were in for the long haul.
And they just, my guess was they couldn't get them, they couldn't go through the contracting process and get a formal approval on that.
I made them go, their contract officer couldn't approve it.
They had to go upstairs to the committee.
It was too much money.
That was my bet, and I was right.
It pays if you're going to be under surveillance, it pays to know government contracting.
Yes, Picture.
That is fascinating, though.
I guess we're going to round out the surveillance.
This is a weird story, but I want you to tell it anyway, which is there's a certain point where someone was surveilling you where they disappeared.
Oh, God.
That was amazing.
You know, I have these moments where I keep saying it just keeps getting weirder, you know.
And I've had a lot of weird things happen.
So this is only one of many.
Yes.
But I was, I was.
Uh, I got off the plane.
This is about 2004.
I got off the plane in San Francisco.
I had business meetings and I got off the plane at the airport and I was being followed.
So I'm really pretty good at picking up, unless you're very, very good at field work and intelligence.
I can pretty much pick you up, not always, but I'm pretty good at it anyway.
I was being followed, and again, it was somebody relatively junior, which luckily you know, you try never to rise to the A team level so you can.
Have the advantage of being able to pick up the B team or the C team.
Anyway, so I could tell I was being followed, and I thought, why?
You know, what are they following me for?
I thought I didn't expect it.
Anyway, so I go to the hotel and follow it all the way to the hotel.
The next morning, I get up and I'm going to an office building right south of Bryant Park.
And, you know, everybody knows I'm going there, it's all very public and open.
Okay, so I go to the building and I'm followed from the hotel to the building.
So, okay, well, I'm under surveillance while I'm in San Francisco.
So I go upstairs, we start the meeting, and there's this fabulous coffee shop.
I don't know if it's still there, up on Bryant Park.
And so I really wanted a great cup of coffee.
So I said, you know, something, I'll go get the coffee for all of us.
So I get a big coffee order, you know, so you have to carry back the trays.
I come down in the building, I'm followed up to the coffee shop.
And Bryant Park is a very narrow opening up, and then it opens out around the park.
It's sort of a clustered area.
Anyway, so I get the coffee, and of course, the guy following me is now he decides to walk in front of me.
He doesn't have to wait for me to go, he knows where I'm going with my coffee trays.
And he looks like a guy, he's a typical kind of stringer that you'll see the contractors use in a situation like this.
He's real sort of agitated as though he has a drug problem.
A lot of times, look at these people hooked on drugs.
Anyway, so he kind of looks like one of these stringers.
So he's right in front of me, and we walk down, we turn to go out, and he turns the corner.
And then two seconds later, I turn the corner, and he's just gone.
He's just completely gone.
And there's no place he can go.
There's not like an alley, there's no place he can go.
He's just gone.
So I called up a friend of mine, he used to be very senior in the CIA, and I said, Do you guys have.
Invisible Man Technology Used 00:08:27
Invisible man technology can like touch your belt and disappear.
And he said, Yes.
Now, I don't trust him.
So I never took that as a confirmed yes because I don't know.
But you know what's interesting about this story?
And you might, I don't think I've ever told you this, which is Jim Mars told me a story that was very similar.
And according to his research, he felt that they did have.
The ability to shield themselves completely from anyone looking at them.
So, you know.
I know I've had experiences in my house in Hickory Valley and in Washington where clearly someone is using invisible, you know, they are getting into the house with invisible man kind of technology.
Yeah.
So there's something like that going on.
I don't begin to understand how it works.
But that's not the only time I've, that's the only time I saw somebody literally kind of disappear right before me.
But I've had other invisible man experiences that are clearly.
I think it's very interesting.
I really do.
Especially, you know, they had this whole flap when Trump was talking about the F 35s and how they could actually disappear and you wouldn't see them.
And they kept saying to him, oh, you know, Trump's crazy.
He's letting things out.
And he kept saying it.
And so there was a real huge pushback to get him to, like, shut up.
And then there was concern in other nations, like, has he announced a new technology?
You know, because Trump would be the kind of guy who would be like, I have invisible planes.
And, um, But this invisible technology, it's been talked about for a long time.
Guys like Jim Keith, you know, these types of people, John Keel talked about it in relation to the men in black.
So I think it's kind of fascinating that you actually had an experience with it.
I don't know.
You know, I just shook my head and said it's just getting, it just keeps getting weirder.
Exactly.
I do think we're dealing with fantastic.
Technology, invisible technology, both for weaponry, for surveillance, for mind control, all this stuff.
I mean, just what I personally experienced, it's amazing.
Yes.
Really, really amazing.
Yeah.
And we need to look at things from a whole different point of view to think about what happens when you have a club, a group who is operating with 60 years of hidden technology.
You just don't know.
Right.
Right.
Exactly.
Yeah.
And you have that wonderful cartoon about Area 51.
This guy is saying, Oh, there's no such thing as flying saucers.
And they're taking his wallet by like protecting themselves from the wall to grab it.
Right.
That really says it all.
Right.
Because if you say you don't care about it, what you need to understand is it's basically got a pipeline into your wallet and it's stealing you blind.
Right.
So you may not care what they're doing with the money, but you better care about the fact that they're stealing you blind.
And one of the reasons they can steal you blind is they're building that kind of invisible technology that gives them the ability to do it.
You know, I think the theory that most people have is if they just pretend to be a member of the cult, you know, please God, leave me alone.
You know, leave me alone to live my life.
I'm happy to live out, you know, outside of your club.
Just please leave me alone.
It's like the movie Network.
Yes.
Everybody's just, please leave me alone.
You know, and I sympathize.
You know, I sympathize.
That's right.
Wow, incredible.
Catherine, fantastic.
It's so great to have you here.
And we're going to talk again really soon because of the kind of fluid situation, as you mentioned, that we're in.
But thank you for taking the time to be with us so long today.
It's great to see you.
It's always great to see you, Daniel.
And, you know, if you look at how the speed at which the world is changing, we could have a five hour conversation in two weeks and we'd have lots of fresh things to talk about.
It's a date.
Okay.
Well, I think we should do a marathon.
When I publish Deep State Tactics next year, it'll be in the first quarter next year.
We have to do one of these because we have to go through all 12 parts, and you have to tell me your favorite deep state tactics.
We have to do like the 10 most delicious deep state tactics.
Okay.
Yes.
It's great to see you.
Thank you so much.
Thank you.
And thank you to your wonderful audience.
Look at them.
Yes.
Yeah.
I'm so happy you're here, really.
Solari.com is where everyone can go for the latest report and all the work that Catherine's doing.
Wow.
Look at this.
Dear Catherine, they are pushing Operation Warp Speed right now on local radio.
And the Fat Talk Show Boys, oh, wait, it went up there.
I lost it.
Claim they care about you, allowing it like your friend of your George is not my friend.
Yeah, Operation Warp Speed, a really huge mistake.
Wait, and the Fat Talk Show Boys claim they care about you, are allowing it like your friend.
All of your George is not mine friend.
Not sure what that means.
That's not interesting.
Yeah, I do think it's interesting when people are hearing that type of propaganda.
They've been hearing a lot on the radio.
I think that this is interesting that they're using the radio to reach that audience.
Well, it makes a lot of sense.
If you look at how starved for revenues every small player is, you can buy a lot of local radio.
It's a smart move.
That's an interesting point.
Think of this.
This is a leveraged buyout of an entire planet.
That's why I'm so afraid if the Democrats get the Senate and they approve the SDRs, that's going to give them enough money to buy the planet.
Wow.
So that Georgia runoff becomes incredibly important.
Yes, very important.
January 5th, that's when they're running it off.
The presidential election, the electors get selected on December 14th.
So there's a lot going on between now and then for sure.
And then the new president, either a re elected President Trump or this Biden facade, gets sworn in on January 20th.
Wow.
I got overturned by my team.
Every year we have a website for our holiday greetings, and they have all our holiday greetings for the last 10 years.
And so we pick a graphic for each year.
So for 2020 holiday greeting, I picked a graphic of Santa Claus with boxing gloves.
But the team overruled me.
So I'm not.
We have a take action crowdfund where we're crowdfunding money for litigators to bring these lawsuits.
So I thought, and that's going to be our Christmas donation.
We're going to put the money down through the take action crowdfund.
And so I thought Santa Claus and Boxing Gloves was very appropriate.
Well, you've pointed this out before, which was, was it last year?
The year before was the year to fight back.
That was this year.
I said in 2020, the number one issue before us in 2020 is what are we going to do about the Beck brothers?
Yes.
In fact, that turned out to be a very prescient call because we are getting overrun by the Beck brothers right now.
So, for those of you who haven't watched Yellowstone, which is an incredible TV series with Kevin Costner, written by Taylor Sheridan, unbelievable.
I think it's truly Shakespeare.
It's unbelievable.
I said this was going to be the year of.
How, you know, that we can't run away from the Beck brothers forever.
We got to turn into the Beck brothers.
And it was interesting.
Overrun by Beck Brothers 00:15:05
Some of my subscribers were very critical of me for recommending something that violent.
And I said, Do you live in America?
Because a lot of us have been able to avoid the violence.
And now we can't.
The violence is going to come out from behind the closet.
And, you know, a lot of people who were offended at the violence of Yellowstone are now going to have to face that violence coming out.
In their communities.
So that's one of the reasons.
You called it with the Kingsman technology.
You'd seen them working it in those weird Wendy's fights.
This all presaged all of the crazy violence that we've seen this year.
So here's the terrible thing about my life.
You know, I really do understand my old partners.
Yes.
You know, you can always see them coming.
You know, you can see it coming.
And I just get so frustrated because I try and explain it and it's hard for other people to fathom.
So, uh, I sometimes feel like I read an article about this wonderful young guy, he had a very upscale profession.
I forget what it was, but he's driving along this BMW and he realizes the bridge, it's some Connecticut bridge, went down.
And so he's able to stop his car, it's at dusk, and he's trying to stop the other cars.
But he's African American.
He's like an African American yuppie with his BMW.
And he's trying to stop the other cars from going down the highway because the bridge is out and they're going to shoot off and die.
And none of them will stop.
Oh my God.
Right?
Because it's after dark and he's a black guy.
So he's trying to stop these people and then they're shooting off the cliff and crashing and dying.
Oh my God.
And he's so frustrated because he can't get them to stop.
Wait, are you saying that's you?
That's what it feels like.
I mean, in 1998, when I realized they were pulling all the money out of the country, and it was really 2000 when I could believe it.
But when I realized they had given up on the country and they were pulling out of the money, I knew if you do this, then all the retirement for the baby boomers is toast.
Yes.
Right.
So you have to turn the aircraft carrier before you hit the iceberg, right?
Right.
So they were turning.
And so.
I thought it was an emergency, and I kept trying to warn everybody.
You know, there's $3 trillion going missing.
There's $4 trillion, you know, on and on and on.
When I met Skidmore, I'd gotten up to $12 trillion.
He pulled us up to $21 trillion.
And no, he really doubled the state of play.
And I kept warning people.
And I'll never forget, I had a wonderful aunt who said, She said, Well, dear, you know, your issue is the missing money.
My issue is peace, so I just don't care about the missing money.
And I said, Don't you realize that if they can steal, you know, at that point it was four train.
I said, If they can steal four train, they get to decide whether or not there's war or peace.
Wow.
My issue is your issue.
It's the same issue.
Deal with reality.
That is fascinating.
Right, but they weren't in the entertainment space.
Right.
You know, we have issues and we go to marches and we do a social thing and, you know, we care about our issue, you know, and.
I don't know how to explain it.
Yeah, it's coming in from that very progressive point of view.
And it is, you know, it's kind of a too simple relationship with the truth and with the issues that are going on.
It feels good.
It looks good.
Well, but it comes from a fundamental trust that the system will take care of you.
If I play ball with the system and I don't mess with the third rail, I'll be taken care of.
And what I was trying to warn everybody is if we do what we're doing with the slave labor camps and the financial coup d'etat, You know, they're doing this so they don't have to take care of us and the money's gone.
Right.
So you got to pay attention now.
And so I'm trying to warn everybody, but they're just shooting off the cliff thinking, well, we can stay in the middle of the road.
It's kind of like Noah.
I mean, there's a correlation with Noah's story in the Bible also, which is Noah believed that he could survive independent.
And I don't believe that.
I've never believed that I could survive independent of all of us.
In other words, if you're going to change the central banking model, then you need a model for all of us.
And what can be done to one can be done to all.
So I never thought I had a chance.
You know, I knew I had to live alone because I would be isolated.
You know, they isolate you and you have to survive isolation.
But I never believed that I could build an ark and take care of myself.
It wouldn't work that way.
Interesting.
That's not a life worth living.
You know, I can't look in a child's eye without, you know, I want to be able to look in a child's eye and know I did my best to help them have a future.
So there's no away.
There's no getting away.
There's no away.
This is planet wide, it's all of us.
And it's at a deep cultural and spiritual level.
There's no.
There's no getting away.
I don't want to get away.
I want to walk right into the middle of the center and say to Mr. Global, We need to turn this.
How can I help?
Because your plan's not going to work.
Can we turn around here?
So I want to walk right into the center and.
Yes.
Right.
Catherine, that is profound when you think about it because so many people are trying to run in some sense.
But the thing is, it's coming for everyone.
So, there's no way around it because RFK Jr. actually explained it to me.
He said, You know, we used to be able to run for the hills.
You can't do that anymore because of the satellites.
I mean, there's no place.
That's a very simple equation.
It's a global plan.
It's what we're dealing with is global.
I used to have the fight all this time in the litigation.
I can't tell you how many people would try and persuade me I had to run away to Panama.
And I used to say to them, Are you kidding?
If you think the Bushies can kill me here, do you know what they can do to me in Panama?
Wow.
Yes.
Well, I've known so many people who tried to get away.
Yeah.
And they go someplace and it's infinitely worse.
You know, so I had one ally who left Wisconsin, moved to Costa Rica to get away, you know, in their jungle paradise.
They had a home invasion and almost died.
Wow.
Well, but if you move to a place where you're a stranger and you don't know the locals and you don't know the state of play, You know, so you have to really be careful because the grass is always greener on the other side.
Now, I'm not saying there aren't places better than others.
If you just look within the United States, there are states that have managed themselves very responsibly and they have good, pretty good state government and freedom state.
We call them freedom states.
Right.
And they have cultures that are more supportive of freedom.
Right.
So that's a perfect example.
So you have a real infrastructure for self reliance that supports the independent producer in South Dakota.
And South Dakota is one of the most financially, if you look at the Truth and Accounting report on state and local governments this year, you know, it's the same players at the top.
It's the people who manage themselves very responsibly on a financial basis that are in the strongest position to restrict or resist because that's, you know, it's the creditors who put a lot of the pressure to get these kinds of agendas done.
So, it's amazing.
And I posted this on Twitter that the Minnesota governor.
Went up there and he said, Eating and drinking spreads COVID.
That's why I'm shutting down Thanksgiving.
It was the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my life.
And it was so dumb.
I thought to myself, This guy's the governor of Minnesota.
I mean, it was such an asinine remark.
And there was no, he didn't take it back or anything.
So here's what happened this guy made a deal.
And we don't know why he made a deal.
He made a deal because the state was threatened.
He made a deal because Mr. Global said, If you don't do it, I'm going to turn on.
You know, the pathogens, the spring, the EMF, and kill 10,000 people.
Right.
So it could have been a control file.
It could have been, I'll turn on the pathogens.
If you don't pretend 10,000 people are dead, I'll kill 10,000 people.
Because I believe they can turn it on and off.
I'll be blunt.
You know, so it could have been they threatened to kill his kid.
There are many different fact patterns, positive and negative, as to why he did what he did.
But then he's got to go out in public and justify something that makes no sense.
Wow.
Right.
And what are you going to do?
My favorite one in.
I can't wait for you to see the second quarter wrap up the injection fraud.
It's so fun.
I don't want to give it away.
So I'm just going to send you the.
We'll mail it to you in about two or three weeks and you'll see.
Then we'll go through it.
But Tucker Carlson had the governor of New Jersey.
Yes.
And Tucker Carlson has really been doing, I think, a remarkably good job.
He's the only person in corporate media that I. You know, pay any attention to because I think he's very astute and he knows what he's doing.
Anyway, he gets the governor of New Jersey on and he starts to squeeze him about the fact that liquor stores are essential, but churches are not.
Right.
You know, not to mention the Constitution.
Okay.
And he keeps squeezing, and the governor answers his question and he says, that doesn't make any sense.
You know, and then he pushes.
And then the governor is just like worse and he pushes again and he won't let up.
He just keeps going after the guy again and again and again.
And the governor just falls apart.
He can't come up with a rational reason why they're shutting down the churches, but liquor stores are essential.
It's unbelievable.
I remember it.
And at the end, the guy says, I wasn't thinking about the Constitution.
Right.
That's kind of a problem.
At last, we have an honest answer.
It's unbelievable.
It is.
And these Democratic governors working together, Gretchen Whitmer, Gavin Newsom, I mean, these are some of the worst people.
In those positions, the positions that they're taking.
In Gretchen Whitmer's case, she banned buying seeds.
My favorite one is that the courts ruled against her.
Yes.
And she came out and said, oh, well, we're going to ignore the courts and do this, this, and this.
And we had the, Catherine Henry is one of the attorneys who filed an amicus brief with the Michigan Supreme Court case.
And she got on, it's a public salary report, so everybody can listen to it.
And the court basically said, no, you can't do it.
No.
The Supreme Court, the Michigan Supreme Court.
And then she comes out and says, oh, well, we're going to do it anyway.
And you think, you know, this is a woman who clearly wants a cabinet position in the Biden administration.
Yeah, right.
Oh, my God.
So here's my question What do you think the chances are she's been neuralinked already?
Hmm.
Well, go back to the Kingsman.
Remember the Kingsman?
I forget if it was the first one or second one.
If you were a government leader and you didn't do what you told, they just explode the chip in your head.
It's like a walking grenade and they just explode your head.
Right.
Excellent point.
Yes.
There is some, I mean, we know pressure, but there is some kind of like shadow mechanism in this pressure.
It could be blackmail, of course, the control files.
We've talked about that.
That these people will attach themselves to.
Newsome is a great example of this, saying some of the stupidest things I've ever heard an elected official say.
You know, I mean, Charlie Baker here is just as bad, but it is bizarre.
Especially, you know.
I think this is part of the cult thing, which is, you know, part of the cult training is to get the cult members to go along and be obedient to irrational orders that constantly change and contradict each other.
And I think part of what Gav Newsom is doing, and I don't really pay much attention to him or watch him, but I think it reflects an understanding that his role is to basically indoctrinate the population to the cult.
And he's playing an acting role.
He's the puppy trainer.
Right.
You know, and basically, if you look at how much money these folks probably have in their offshore accounts and the sort of different rewards they get, you know, I remember once watching one of the partners at Dylan Reed when I was a young associate, and he was dealing with a very temperamental client, and the client was just screaming at him and being completely irrational, and he was just sitting there managing it in a very lovely way.
And I thought, how does he do it?
And then He'd asked me to drop something on his desk.
I went in and he'd left his W 2 form that indicated he'd been paid more than a million dollars the prior year.
And I said, Oh, that's how he did it.
He was sitting there thinking, Can you believe somebody would pay me a million dollars a year just to listen to this bozo?
Million Dollar Listener Perspective 00:03:14
No problem.
I'm happy to do it for a million dollars a year.
No problem.
I'm laughing all the way to the bank.
So, you know, if you get paid enough, it gives perspective.
I mean, it's when you're a member of the establishment at that level, it can be wonderful.
I mean, you.
You just can't imagine the personnel benefits, and they're laughing all the way to the bank.
Yeah.
So, and what it reflects is a deep disgust at the general population.
I mean, they have reached a point where they have no empathy.
And that's part of the problem with the secrecy.
So remember, if you're a governor and, you know, so I'm making this up, I'm just giving you a theoretical.
But if you believe Mr. Global is going to turn on the pathogens and the EMF and kill 100,000 people if you don't do this, then you think this is the better alternative to basically, you know, tell people they have to wear masks at their Thanksgiving and they can only have three people.
You know, they have to take off their mask, eat a piece of turkey, put it back on before they get their next beat.
You know, you come up with these ridiculous things because you think it's better than having 100,000 people killed by Mr. Global, right?
Right.
You always mentioned those interesting stories about those little towns across America where soccer moms got together to drive out the drugs that were in the community and the black budget sent in basically James Bond types to set the situation right.
Right.
That power is always out there.
Willing to move into these unusual situations.
And when it shows up, it's so out of place because you're like, hey, this is soccer mom suburbia.
What are you doing with black helicopters here?
Right.
It's a great, if you read the boys in the track story, that's a perfect example.
Oh, yeah.
Because the boys killed one of their mothers, Linda Ives, decided to do something about it.
And the next thing you know, she's got basically James Bond and the black helicopters coming down on her head.
And she's just, she's a mom homemaker.
You know, in rural Arkansas, and she's just trying to find out who killed her kid.
Right.
But James Bond and the entire national security state cannot afford for her to do that.
Exactly.
Right.
And she can't fathom that the system is that centralized in a way that would make her that important.
And yet it did.
It was.
Over and over again, people have to realize how important they are in situations.
And this is, I mean, you know, It is an interesting thing because they're rational and they're like, This wouldn't happen in a rational world, but the world's not rational.
It's not rational.
But I will tell you something else.
Yes.
The great line in scripture the prayers of a righteous man availeth much.
Ah.
So you are powerful.
You are powerful.
You have no idea how powerful you are.
Well, I remember the Jim Garrison quote, which is, One man armed with the truth constitutes a majority.
Yes, it does.
Kennedy Assassination Rationality 00:07:29
He was amazing.
He was amazing.
What that man accomplished was absolutely amazing.
It's incredible.
Do you know what he did on his deathbed?
He's an amazing, amazing man.
That's why, whenever anybody says, Why is nobody doing anything, I want to punch him.
But one of the people I point to is Jim Garrison.
On his deathbed, I think he'd become a judge, but as a judge, he had a pension.
His wife had divorced him when he kept going after the Kennedy thing.
So he got his wife to come in and marry him again right on his deathbed so that when he died, she would have a pension.
Right.
Yes.
You know what they call that?
They call that a Southern gentleman.
Yes.
Spoken like a true Tennessean.
Yeah.
Yeah.
He was an amazing, amazing man.
So, yeah, remarkable story.
His story is still unfolding.
This is the amazing thing about quite a life, but standing up to that machine and touching into this thing, which we still don't know exactly what it is, but we know it's associated with these, you know, the entire deep state and even the technological aspects that were hidden.
He touched into all of it.
You know, one of my big questions I don't know if you remember this.
So, you remember the wonderful Oliver Stone movie?
Oh, sure.
Okay.
So the Fletcher Proudy character is played by, I forget what his name is, the tall guy.
Donald Sutherland.
Donald Sutherland.
Okay, so that's Fletcher Powell.
And they imply, and Fletcher Proudy says they sent him out of town to New Zealand to get out of the way.
Yes.
Is that true, or did they send him to Antarctica?
No, they sent him to Antarctica, exactly.
Right.
Yeah.
They did not move to New Zealand.
On the way back.
What was he doing in Antarctica?
He was, the official story was he was escorting some diplomats there.
It was really a strange story.
And on the way back, somehow he ended up coming in through New Zealand and getting this newspaper, which had the Kennedy assassination story with Oswald and all that before they had grabbed him.
Right.
But let's talk about the governance system.
We know by reading David Talbot's story when they killed Kennedy, they had Dulles.
You had the Rockefeller Foundation at Williamsburg with the farm, right?
Right.
And they have Dulles going to Boston, equity, New York, stocks and bonds.
Okay.
So they have Dulles coordinating with the money centers, but they got Proudy in Antarctica.
Right.
Now, was that out of the way or was that part of coordination with the governance system?
Interesting.
Yes.
Well, his job would have been to set up security for the president for the Dallas trip.
And so putting him in Antarctica is quite an interesting thing to do.
Well, first of all, it's protecting him.
Right?
Yes.
Right.
But it could also be having him do something more important.
Well, one of the things that he noticed when he came back, when people were taking pictures of all the tramps and all that stuff, is that Ed Lansdale was in Dealey Plaza.
And so they probably didn't want him to see his old boss.
He'd be like, What is my old boss doing here?
And, you know, Lansdale had shown up in a number of coup d'etats in Asia, of course, and this is the kind of guy that he was.
The frightening thing about that assassination was how many people were in on the deal.
It was extraordinary.
Yes.
Yeah.
Yeah, and it changed everything.
It really did.
And it's funny, for many decades after that, you know, there were the insiders and the outsiders.
And if you were in on the deal and the assassination, you were an insider.
And if you weren't, you were an outsider.
It was amazing to watch in the establishment how that worked.
Yes, absolutely.
And it's fascinating to watch when you really get into how Kennedy got into office, he came in very independently.
And I would say that that's something he had in common with Trump in a sense.
Which is, they had their own independent sources of income, wealth, and connections, that they weren't a puppet the way Sam Nixon was.
What Kennedy had was amazing intelligence.
Yes.
He had worked for Forrestal and his father.
If you look at his father's networks into Hollywood and into the business establishment and into organized crime, his father's networks were amazing.
Yes.
So, what Kennedy had between Forrestal and his father was enormous intelligence.
Absolutely.
Right.
He had the background, and Forrestal.
As defense secretary, it's interesting because Forrestal took him to post war Berlin after the war.
They're escorting him around and saying, take a look at these ruins of Berlin.
And so that close relationship, because Forrestal is also a Catholic, as well as being a close friend, they have that nexus there.
So Kennedy does.
I mean, he's not some kind of great.
And Eisenhower briefed him completely.
So he had a full briefing by Eisenhower.
So between his dad and Forrestal and Eisenhower, you know, Kennedy had remarkable intelligence.
It's interesting to me that with Kennedy, they decided we actually have to remove him completely, that they felt he would survive a scandal or anything else that they could use to remove him, that they had got to the point where they said the only thing that's going to work is assassination.
They thought he was going to give away the empire.
They thought he was weak.
They thought he was sentimental.
They really thought he was going to blow the American opportunity.
Right.
But they also saw him moving so far away from what they wanted to do, and that they had kind of built up all these things.
You know, at a certain point, they were naming different parts of Cuba, they were changing the names, and like they had all of these plans for buildings that they were going to have in Cuba.
And we know that they transferred much of that plan to Vietnam.
But it's interesting to me because to lose all that, you know, they must have just felt completely incensed.
Because, of course, if you had a Nixon in there, you probably would have gone into Cuba.
Bringing Forward Hidden Plans 00:04:44
I don't know.
I don't know.
But they did take that loss very, very badly.
Yes.
They took it very, very badly.
His easy access with the UFO file, his knowledge of the UFO file, it's a major unwritten piece of history.
Different people have tried to write it.
I've had people who, like the Watergate lawyer Doug Caddy, come on and talk about how E. Howard Hunt had said that Kennedy was killed over the UFO file.
That's a pretty high level CIA person, Hunt, to be sure.
So I think the only way we can get to the bottom of the UFO file.
It's going to take two things.
We have enough of us to figure out how to live and function and still maintain the integrity of our minds.
So, we're going to have to come to grips with the mind control technology.
And then, when we do, we're going to have to find a way for a sufficient number of people in the Western world to let go of their fear of not being socially respectable if they talk about the UFO issue.
So, you know, they've been able, for some reason, the indoctrination is that it is not socially acceptable to discuss that.
You know, you will lose your ticket to rise in the tapeworm if you talk about that.
You will lose your credibility.
You know, so I can leave the establishment and go into independent media as long as I don't talk about that.
I can still be credible.
So there's this fear of being forever outside the matrix if you go there.
And what we need is a stampede of people saying, you know, something, we're going to go there.
Because this is the kind of thing, it's too big, it's too complicated for any small group of people to figure it out.
You need a massive, open conversation.
You know, with lots of.
Right.
And I think when is the pain going to be great enough that we're prepared to talk about how weird it really is?
Excellent point.
Well, the other thing is that that whole kind of.
The whole field around it was starved so badly that it just became the plaything for weird marketing ops and cults and things like that.
So, all the serious research, dramatic research from like John Mack and people, Stanton Friedman, it all went out the window with these like Gaia TV type things.
Right.
And that's where it is, that's kind of the state of it today.
I mean, TTSA is like that as well.
I just saw the phenomena.
Have you seen that yet?
Yes.
And it had a lot of very good footage of military.
Witnesses that I thought was very useful.
Yes, I like James Fox.
Unfortunately, they pay a lot of homage to TTSA in there, and I think that's part of the problem.
I think that TTSA and Harry Reid got their hands in it.
This is the thing.
I never worry about any of that.
I'm just looking for the footage.
Yeah.
Every time you could bring forward, and that's what I loved about the press conference that was done in, I guess it was 2001, summer of 2001.
Anytime you can bring forward a credible military person who has direct first person testimony, yeah, you know, anytime, yeah, right.
I just find that testimony to be invaluable, and the more you can bring forward, and so anytime a documentary brings more of it forward, I find it very useful, definitely.
I actually, I mean, I give him a lot of credit for putting it together, and he did all the documentaries on the Phoenix Lights and stuff, he's really good.
At his work, I just feel like the um, you know, it's interesting that when you get these good things, everything now the whole Tom DeLong circus thing has to get on board with it, you know, it jumps in there, and so you can't go into it.
Are you ready for this?
The New York Times affirmed their credibility, right?
And we know how much we can trust the New York Times.
I knew I was going to be happy in Hickory Valley.
I first got there, and the first month.
Crazy Fluid Election Results 00:11:33
The whole congregation was together for a business meeting at the Hickory Valley Baptist Church.
And somebody said, How do you know that?
And the woman said, Oh, it was in the New York Times.
And the whole congregation broke out laughing at the idea.
Somehow that would make it true.
It's like, The New York Times, you must be kidding.
They all cracked up laughing.
So, you know, the South knows.
The South.
No question.
No question.
Okay.
It's 11 24.
I haven't had dinner yet.
I still have a commentary to write.
So, We've been on now.
You know, we were saying goodbye an hour ago, but we've been on since six.
So that's five hours and 25 minutes.
So I think that's a world record.
Yes.
Catherine, that's what we call a real hardcore Catherine session.
It's great to see you.
I will send you the injection fraud.
Yes.
And I'm dying to tell you about one part of it, but I'll wait until you get it.
And then we should jump back on.
Okay?
I can't wait.
Fantastic.
Everyone's so happy to see you here.
It's just great to have you for this time.
And we'll talk soon.
Okay.
Bye.
Have a great one.
Unbelievable.
Everyone, Catherine Austin Fitz, blowing us all away.
Now, Catherine's in the Netherlands right now.
So we talked and we did a whole kind of one hour interview.
And she said, You know, I'd like to go live.
It's too bad we couldn't go live.
It's too bad about the time difference.
And I said, You know what?
Let's go live right now.
And it was completely off the cuff.
We were so lucky that Dimensions and Beyond was out there to manage the chat.
Thank you, Carly.
You did a great job.
And, you know, Catherine had a lot to impart to us.
And today was the time.
And she really.
Took us through that whole process.
This wasn't going to be just some comfortable election horse race discussion.
This went very deep into the forces behind some of the Civil War things that we've been seeing and some of the deep state action behind the election tactics and why we see people like James Clapper and John Brennan from the CIA teams from the Obama days coming up and saying, we have to pull that 25th Amendment on Trump.
This is the nature of the problem that.
We've been seeing out there, which is there's a huge battle beneath the surface, and you're not getting it in the mainstream media because all they care about is trying to push an election result before all the votes were counted.
And they wanted to make sure it came out their way.
And who knows, they may get their way on that, but they're not going to get it without a whole lot of transparency.
And that's what we're about here.
But I have to say, with Catherine's work, whether I go all the way back to, because I've known Catherine for years, and When I think of just how ahead of the curve that she's been, you know, she did a space report in the fall of 2005, of 15, I'm sorry, 2015 was the year, and it was, let's go the space economy.
This thing is like incredible in terms of predicting things and the trends that were coming.
And this is just how it works with Catherine because she collects that information, she's been in government, she's been in finance.
She understands those worlds.
She understands how those power circles work, having worked for both Bush and Clinton.
And it's that kind of snapshot, that insight into reality.
I think it was described as it's hard to see things on the battlefield, and once in a while there's a big explosion and you can see the whole field just for a second and it goes dark again.
So that's those Solari reports.
And I always say that I'm a graduate from Solari University because I've learned so much from this incredible thread.
That Catherine has done.
And it's not just financial.
I mean, it is psychospiritual.
It is geopolitical.
And, you know, it takes into account so many different sides that it can look into anything from advanced technology, as she has done.
And as I was pointing out, you know, you go on some of those financial shows for the things that they expect her to talk about, be like, you know, what about treasuries?
What do you see happening the next year?
And she will talk about the UFO file.
Because she knows everything needs to be on the table.
Because without that kind of transparency, we're not going to know what's going on.
And we've seen what the result of that is.
We get these kind of very bizarre situations coming at us out of the blue.
You know, it's here's a mask, a pandemic, by the way, his social revolution.
You know, here's a bunch of looters.
Here's an election fraud.
I mean, you know, it's quite a situation.
So there's a lot of really loose cannons at the helm right now.
And the best way for us to get a handle on it is to take into account some of those really deep people like Catherine Austin Fitz and her amazing work, which spans decades, you know, and it might be a lark.
For some people to just throw out ideas like, hey, you know, there's missing money from the Pentagon.
And it might be, you know, just kind of a punchline.
But with Catherine's work, you have decades of research behind it.
You know, it's not up for debate, it's something to be known that we have all these trillions missing from the government.
Then what?
What happens when we get to that point where we understand these things have happened?
And why did it happen?
And where did the money go?
These are all the kind of crucial pieces that I think we need now.
So I want to thank so many of you for joining me for this very impromptu but very necessary session with Catherine Austin Fitz.
And I will be putting out the other hour that we did as well.
It's great to see everyone out there.
I'll do a couple of shout outs.
A Cole fan, he is there.
Luke, Jay Lee, T. Jordan.
This daytime crowd, you get some interesting people, some interesting names.
Frank Monday, thank you.
It's very good to see you.
Indiana Joe.
Wow.
Excellent.
Susan Dorr, Jonathan Fries, Carolyn Goida.
It's great to see you.
It's nice to have you out there.
Eminem.
Someone says 8 p.m. tonight.
That's good.
No, this will be enough for today.
But we will be back with the X Series next week for sure at 8 p.m. in our usual Friday slot.
And we'll have something very important for you.
Bruce Ross Morgan, fantastic to see you, sir.
Thank you for joining us.
Harry Honkinen, excellent.
Great to see so many people out there enjoying the program.
And thank you for your support with Super Chat.
We appreciate that from the ideas, from you know, we're able to do what we do because of your support and all of our subscribers who really keep things going here at Dark Journalist.
We definitely appreciate it.
Lisa Frequency, great to see you out there.
Lee Veltman, of course.
Chrissy, there she is.
Tracy Neal, Truth Flora.
Wow, great crowd tonight.
The ideas from Carly at Dimensions, of course, did an excellent job tonight.
What incredible timing that was!
So last minute, as it were.
And Griffin Eagle, Scarlet Fire, terrific.
Excellent.
Kate, I know you're out there.
It's great to see you.
Daniel Browning, Shamaness Amon Kara.
It's great to see you.
Two terrific.
Wow.
Can you imagine that?
Four hours basically with Catherine Austin Fitz.
Whew.
I try to come down off of that.
That is really fascinating.
We will see you all next week.
I may have a surprise for you between now and then because of all the crazy fluid election results that we've seen going on.
Plus, part two of Russell Targ and the remote viewing episode will be coming out soon as well.
It is great to have everyone here during the day, as I said.
And what A treasure trove of information from Catherine to help us navigate through this kind of a very, very tricky situation coming up with these forces coming together.
And, you know, it does feel like there are these great opportunities and, you know, right in the middle of it.
But it also feels like there's a war right under the surface there.
So we need to be on top of it.
And one of the things that Catherine is famous for saying is that nobody's as smart as all of us.
So we need all of that great input that you guys have and that you deliver for us in your emails and in your messages.
And right there in the ideas room for everyone, I want to remind you to go to darkjournalist.com and sign up for the newsletter.
That keeps us in touch whether or not they go for the big shutdown in social media.
It will make a difference to us if you are signed on and you're with us.
And we will send you the newsletter about once a week.
It's not even, you know, there's not a lot of marketing in there or anything like that.
We just let you know what shows are coming up.
And if you become a member, which is also very inexpensive, and I highly recommend it coming up because we're going to have some very special things for our members.
And you'll get the episodes delivered directly into your inbox.
And we have some very, very special benefits there as well.
So thank you so much, everyone.
Great to see you.
And I hope you have a fantastic weekend.
And we'll see you soon, but at least next Friday with the X series, we'll have that ready for you.
Catherine Austin Fitz, all of her work is available at Solari.com.
This is the really key work, and it informs so many of.
My different points of view and looking at things.
And, you know, Catherine is that deep thinker that can really get us to a different plateau of looking at things where things open up.
You know, it's almost takes that magic presence of somebody like Catherine really giving us this incredible insight.
And she's just the one for us on this.
Of course, we had Dr. Joseph Farrell commenting on the election on Tuesday, just phenomenal.
We need to get Gigi Young back on to get her incredible insights going.
These are the guests that we want to bring to you.
Because they just have that amazing quality.
And someone just mentioned that it's Friday the 13th, Christy Belli.
Yes, it is.
So, you know, it's already interesting.
So, watch it out there because it's going to get more interesting, especially.
I think it's a new moon, but I think that that is Sunday.
So, it's coming up for sure.
We will see you all on Friday.
And I'll do a couple of truths.
Jennifer M. Galactic, H O D L Crypto.
Fantastic.
Just great to have everyone with us here tonight.
We will see you all next week and have a fantastic weekend.
You know, it says I'm broadcast, but the truth is, it never really ends, right?
Talk to you soon.
Export Selection