Dr. Joseph Farrell and Daniel Liszt dissect the 2020 election as a "Deep State Monkey Business," alleging media rigging in swing states like Pennsylvania and Arizona to suppress Trump's projected 268 electoral votes. They claim the Hunter Biden laptop leak originated from "Free Chinese" networks linked to Taiwan, while General Anthony Tata's Pentagon appointment signals a coup attempt via the 25th Amendment. Farrell predicts a violent backlash if Trump loses, warns that Western allies like Japan and Germany will rearm due to US instability, and asserts that a Biden victory masks draconian measures orchestrated by globalist cabals. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
Time
Text
Election Fraud and State Counts00:15:04
And we are live.
This is Dark Journalist.
It's great to be here with everyone.
It's a huge crowd tonight already.
And I want to say that we're looking at a very special evening because we're going to be joined in a few moments by Dr. Joseph Farrell.
And tonight we won't have the lovely Olivia because a lot of these election broadcasts are spontaneous.
So they're hard to schedule, but she's going to be back soon.
And I'm just checking here with Dr. Farrell, and he has a few issues that he's Putting together right now.
But we've been looking at a very interesting evening of strange reports around the election that have been going on.
And you know, it was a week ago tonight that we saw the first election results.
And they looked very favorable initially to President Trump.
And then, unusually and most mysteriously, they stopped the count, which is something that you do not see in elections.
And even with the whole COVID excuse, it's a weird thing.
And a lot of these states freelancing their way to a voting total is also very strange.
You're supposed to get your vote total in, especially when it counts.
Now, I've been putting together maps of this as we've been moving things along.
I'm going to show them real quick.
There's something I floated out there called the true map.
And I guess before I show you the true map, I'm going to show you these not so true maps.
Now, first of all, this is important today.
Trump has been projected to win North Carolina in its 15 electoral votes in the 2020 election.
Now, this is crucial because they denied him this state originally, along with Alaska, where he has over a two to one margin and 60% reporting.
So they're increasingly just keeping his totals low.
And this represents a pattern on whoever your candidate is or whatever side of the fence you're coming on.
We don't want to see that kind of censorship going on or to play into it, even if it plays into our advantage or somebody wants Biden.
You don't want to see these types of shenanigans.
And I would say that whether it was Bernie or anyone else.
But in this case, it's Trump.
And they had this kind of kamikaze plan, which is they would deny him any good news that was going on during his election.
And he would have huge crowds.
And all they would say would be like, oh, they're terrible super spreader events and all this nonsense.
And then as soon as they had this phony rollout for Biden winning, they had tons of people dancing in the streets.
And they're like, we can't contain the crowds.
And they just forget all about those good old COVID.
Rules that they made up in the first place.
So we're in a very unusual situation.
But I think when the election is in play the way that it is and the media has taken this kamikaze role, then we have to acknowledge to ourselves that this is a very dangerous situation that they've placed us in, and all because they're willing to shoot their own credibility down as long as they get rid of Trump.
This is it.
They've got to get rid of Trump.
This is where they're coming from.
So there it is.
So Trump has won.
North Carolina, and it's very significant because of the length of time that they held out on him.
The other states that they're holding out, as I mentioned, Alaska, of course, he has in the bag.
Georgia is also a state that's going to go into Trump's column.
And so the map that I came up with based on these results, and of course the true map predicted this very interesting situation that we're seeing with North Carolina going into the wind column.
This is the true map, and I want to point out that these figures are.
Undeniable.
We've got all of the 268 and 253 here.
And that map is solid, and I'm going to go through it in greater detail as we go along tonight.
But one of the things that it shows is that there are 17 toss ups available still for either candidate.
And that's all very important because the two states that are continuing to count, and I want to say this about Nevada, which the press has also called prematurely with what you call a false call.
That is, you make the call too early and then later you can mock it back, but in the meantime, you've made it look inevitable.
So, we've seen an awful lot of this type of activity in this election to the point where it may be the most fraud based election in history, which is saying a lot, but I feel like they've really pulled the trigger on this one in order to get the job done.
Now, the true map I've put out there, and it's on our Twitter feed, it's easy to get a copy of it there, but I'm also going to include an extra copy.
And I'm getting results on this all the time.
I'm just sending Joseph a link again so he can join us.
We're going to have Dr. Joseph Farrell here going over all the deep state monkey business that we've been looking at in this election.
And in relation to the true map, the way that I have it worked out is 268 for Trump and Pence with 253 for Biden and Harris.
The way that that works is very simple.
If you just give Trump the states that he's won, North Carolina, Georgia, Ohio, And Alaska, then, you know, those are the stats that he has.
The question around this whole thing is Pennsylvania.
And a lot of people have said, hey, the media made a call for Pennsylvania for Biden.
Well, there's a few interesting things, and I've gone over this in a series of videos, but I'm going to reiterate this information tonight because I think it's crucial.
First of all, Pennsylvania, when we all went to bed on election night, that was 800,000 votes in favor of President Trump.
Now, I'll tell you, You do not come back if you are a candidate from an 800,000 vote deficit in a state like that.
There's a lot of reasons for that.
Even if you have counties that are favorable to you, it's an insurmountable margin, but they had to count all the votes, et cetera.
So, what happened was a series of ballots started to show up, and they designed this very unusual, unconstitutional voting system just previous to the election.
And they had the state Supreme Court set up all these parameters for how you could do the vote, and they made it very accessible to certain areas and not to others.
So, what's going to happen is a huge constitutionality of the voting process is going to come into play there.
And I want to put this on the record because there's been a lot of pushback saying, oh, well, you know, there is no Supreme Court involvement and all the rest.
No, there already is Supreme Court involvement in the case in Pennsylvania.
And that's a crucial thing for us to know because, as it turns out, the Supreme Court ordered.
The late arriving ballots, and also included in that the so called mystery ballots, to be segregated away.
That is, they wanted a better look at them.
Are they legit ballots?
Did they come in according to the constitutional process of how it was agreed upon in the first place?
Or did the governor, who is a Democrat, set up very unusual rules just before the election in order to favor the Democratic counties?
This is the nature of the battle that's going on there.
And if you look at the 800,000 advantage that Trump had going in, things get very, very interesting.
What we're looking at there is a late attempt using unusual, unconstitutional voting methods and then counting the ballots for days after the fact to try to lessen the margin of victory on the Trump side and take it away.
Because with those 20 electoral votes, either candidate would win.
But as I pointed out on the true map, the case is that it's 268 versus 253 for Biden.
Now, there's even another strange call here when we look at this, which is.
The call for Biden in Nevada.
Now, Nevada accepted ballots up until five o'clock today, but they called it on Saturday.
So it's ridiculous.
Of course, you have to wait till all the ballots will be counted, and it's neck and neck.
Now, they might think that Biden's going to pull it out, but there's no way you could make a legitimate projection based on those types of results.
And if you could make hardcore projections, for example, Alaska hasn't gone for a Democrat since 1964.
So if you're leading two to one, then they would make that call for Trump.
But they didn't, and they still haven't.
And Alaska doesn't expect to make it till the end of the month.
Well, who set that up?
When does that ever happen?
Who doesn't call states?
I mean, during the 2000 election, we had a cliffhanger over Florida and 537 votes of the Supreme Court, eventually solved after 37 days.
And there is a precedent for very close elections.
But a little tiny state like Alaska, you can count very easily.
Ohio, which is how much bigger in terms of actual votes?
They had that that night.
Florida was very easy.
So, where are you getting all these slowdowns with the count?
It's a very important question to answer if we want the answer to this election.
Everyone, you're watching The Dark Journalist Show.
This is a very special report on Election 2020, which is Deep State Monkey Business.
We're going to be joined shortly by Dr. Joseph Farrell, who, along with me and a number of other people, were very disturbed by the media grab and psyop around this election.
I happen to think that they think with the tools that they have on the tech side and with the control of the media that they can really pull this one over.
But as it turns out, you know, they don't.
And we do have the ability to question it.
And they've been moving into the Biden president elect phase.
This is all very disturbing because, for a lot of reasons, one of the things is that Biden, the way that they're trying to push him, Here's their map.
Let's take a look at this.
And I'll try to angle this.
As you can see, I'm not in my normal studio tonight, and I'm doing this straight off the cuff as best I can.
That is the way that they have the presidential election results called for Fox News.
Now, they've got Biden at 290 and Trump at 214.
First of all, Trump at 214 is ridiculous because North Carolina is called.
So that's 15 votes there.
That would make him 229.
Then Alaska, as I just explained.
Those are his votes.
So, for you know, we take those three votes in Alaska and the 15 in North Carolina, and you get 19 on top of 214.
That's 233.
Let's see how, where do we get the rest of the votes?
15, 16 of the electoral votes are in Georgia, which Trump was winning before they started the strange shenanigans again.
And you also get a situation in Georgia where it's neck and neck, even with the weird ballots coming in late.
And then there goes an automatic recount, and the automatic recount favors Trump.
Those 16 electoral votes will go into Trump's column, and the Supreme Court case delivers, is on course to deliver the 20 electoral votes from Pennsylvania to Trump.
So we had 36 on to Trump's total there.
That brings us to 268.
We started with the 214 chart that they've had Trump stuck at.
They won't even allow him to get the North Carolina, Alaska votes in these charts.
So the charts are ultimately rigged.
One of the biggest rigging things that took place, and it's media rigging, I want to say, in relation to this, because the vote stuff, there's enough irregularities, but the media can always sift through that.
That's what we're here for.
You're supposed to go up and ask the electors.
And get on the side of people who say, well, my vote wasn't counted, or there was a problem, or they made me fill it out with a sharpie, or whatever it happened to be.
So you don't get against those people, but this media is poised to say, how dare you question the election results, which is absurd.
Because, of course, they've been questioning for four years whether there was Russian interference.
I love that immediately, as soon as the election was over this time, they were like, there appears to be no Russian interference, because they knew that they were going to get favorable totals to their candidate.
And there was something very strange, I have to say, going on in relation to how the media was reporting this.
The first real oddity was the call for Arizona.
Arizona is a state with 11 electoral votes.
The New York Times still has not called that state.
CNN originally leaned into that.
They have it open now.
Fox News and EP called it for Biden, which was absurd, but it was to create that atmosphere of inevitability.
So, we have to see what they were doing with these individual states, and I could go into each state and how we're having those problems.
Oh, here's Dr. Farrell.
Hold on just a second.
Okay, he is going to be joining us very shortly, and we were going to go into this deeply with him, but I am sort of setting up, so I'm going to continue to set this up.
One of the things that I would say is kind of important for us to look at in terms of Arizona is this.
Arizona has pretty much in every election gone.
Red.
There are a few exceptions, but basically it's a red state.
And it went for Trump last time and it's gone progressively for Republicans over the years.
For them to just come up with this out of a hat with no good indications of it, especially since it's neck and neck all the way down the road, Fox News was the one who called it.
And this is very important because what you're seeing at Fox News is a very unusual coupling of the original establishment, the kind of Bush Iraq.
War group that wants war in Iran, hooking up with the Biden interventionists, Obama style, bomb the heck out of Libya, bomb them back to the Stone Age, and then take over and create a new central bank for them.
This kind of intervention group is on both the Republican and the Democrat side.
This is the group that you see active that did not get what they wanted when President Trump was in office.
Financial Reset and Intervention00:15:24
They wanted a big war.
And they wanted war with Iran, war with Russia.
And Trump, you know, very much favorable to the military in terms of budgets, but it was all about let's make our stuff the best.
He did not want the foreign intervention.
And the truth is that he kept us out of wars.
Whether you're a Democrat or a Republican, that's a good thing.
And we did see him doing that.
And that's how he earned the ire of the deep state in this case.
Now, even people like Professor Peter Dale Scott, for example, who had in this program, who came out of retirement to talk to me about these things, and who was the person who created.
The term the deep state for our use to understand what's going on here, he understands that the deep state is poised against the presidency, in this case, Trump.
So, regardless of where he might be coming from in relation to Republican or Democrat, he can see the crime in the middle being committed by the CIA and the deep state.
That is, trying to overpower the foreign policy decisions of the president with pressure from this weird intervention side.
And that intervention side, remember.
Has to do with the military industrial complex that Eisenhower called out.
And so we've been having this problem since Kennedy tried to rein it back in and try to smash the CIA into a thousand pieces.
This is the nature of the structure that we're in.
And so, as far as I'm concerned, what we're looking at with the latest skullduggery around.
Oh, I've got Joseph here once again.
Hold on just a second.
We are going to get him a new link because he's having an issue.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
We are going to go deep tonight with Oxford scholar Dr. Joseph Farrell.
And, you know, Dr. Farrell, it's interesting because, again, he's not coming in on any particular side of the argument.
He sees abuses on both sides, whether it is the regular kind of right wing.
Side of things, or if it's the left wing.
And he definitely sees weird things with the left that are going on right now.
Getting him this new link.
Hold on just a second.
Okay, that should be good.
And this is important, and it's something that I noticed too, which is you know, we have some of the best people out there, and regardless of where they fall, Uh, you know, just like Glenn Greenwald making these extraordinary statements in relation to the censorship that he received at his own website, which is really quite phenomenal.
Uh, and I think Dr. Farrell is here and joining us, and we're going to pick that up in a minute.
Joseph, are you there?
Finally, how are you?
Well, let's see.
Um, I'm getting feedback.
Yeah, well, you sound good and you look good.
Uh, I'm still getting feedback every Station on YouTube, and when they shut down the count, I said, My first thought was, 'Here we go.' Particularly when they shut down Pennsylvania and Fox calls it for Arizona, I thought, 'No, here we go.' You know, it's I don't know how else to describe this other than not only is it fraud, but it's a fraud on the fraud.
Yes, isn't it true?
Yeah, totally.
The Fox call was the weirdest.
Oh, totally.
Totally.
But the things that upset me the most are the Wisconsin and Michigan calls.
Because there it's so obvious that you are dealing with, oh, we're behind.
We've got to go manufacture votes.
And, you know, they have videos of people hurriedly stamping these things and filling out, you know, the bribing box.
And you know, shuffling all these papers.
How else do you explain the fact that Trump supposedly loses and all the down ballot elections go for the Republicans?
This is the thing, and it's weird too because there are so many weird charts in this election, but the chart out of Wisconsin and Michigan at the same time, both of them shoot up.
In this strange vertical line.
That's actually the only chart I don't have to show here tonight, but everyone's seen it, and it is quite absurd.
That kind of dump that they made with the votes there overnight after they stopped counting was the clearest indication of fraud taking place.
Yeah.
And not only that, but now we're getting stories and videos.
I saw a video, Daniel.
Of a ballot counter in Michigan videotaping himself, opening up a Trump ballot and said, Oh, that's Trump, and literally tearing it in half right on the screen and tossing it back behind him.
Yeah.
You know, I mean, come on, folks.
It's kamikaze.
It's kamikaze.
So, why do we have a fraud on the fraud?
Why are they pumping up the narrative that Bryan won and Trump lost at the same time they are visibly cutting off any Trump people from presenting their evidence on the media?
Right.
And to me, that's.
That spells a scenario.
They are literally trying to gin up the left so that if the courts decide in Trump's favor, then all hell breaks.
Yes.
And if Bryven wins, there's no doubt in my mind he's an illegitimate president.
Yes.
So we're screwed once again by these people.
He's a creature of the national security state.
Yeah.
Either one of them at this point.
Especially as weak a candidate as he is going in.
Pat Buchanan, who I think really knows how to drill down on a lot of the presidential election issues, said, We've never had a more enfeebled potential president.
Right.
And this is important.
I mean, we've pointed it out before that it was almost laughable the strange things that were going on in relation to Biden and not being able to think things through.
And it's too bad, it's something that happens.
But in his case, he's had a couple of brain aneurysms.
And he is elderly and he just seems to have lost those basic mental faculties.
You know, it's something we were able to observe all through the election.
I do feel that they were giving him some kind of a drug of some sort during the debates to look at least a little more with it.
And we heard a number of things like they were giving him an internal teleprompter, which they can do actually with contact lenses, a program that Google developed where you can read script right off your contact.
So I think we were seeing some of that going on there.
But the question is, I understand, let's get Trump out.
That's where they were coming from.
But this level of getting Trump out, they wanted him out at any cost, even the reputation, even the media's reputation, had to get him out.
That's what they're up to.
Yeah, that's the way it strikes me.
And the question is why?
And I suspect it has a lot to do with financial reset that they got cooked up.
Somebody, I think it was somebody that may even be in your chat room.
Told me that there was that suspicious statement that Nasty Piglossi made about, you know, well, let's just wait till February.
Yeah.
Well, what happens in February besides St. Valentine's Day?
You know, I get the feeling that they're on some sort of timetable here.
Yeah.
And I don't see any resolution to this, regardless of how the Supreme Court works.
Calls this thing.
Sure.
I don't see any resolution.
For one thing, 71 million Trump voters are not going to disappear into the woodwork.
Exactly.
And neither are all the worked up people on the Looney Tunes left.
Right.
So, you know, it's.
Look, the scenario I'm toying around with, Daniel, is they have so run up the federal debt and they have so many obligations.
The only way to walk away from them is to split the country.
Right.
And that's what I think the goal is.
So, the reset regime has to do with getting rid of the debt which is still there with Social Security, military pensions, treasuries, the whole thing.
The whole thing.
So, if they do, if they are able to split the country, suddenly those liabilities become, in a sense, null and void.
Yeah, they walk away from all their obligations and leave whatever's left of the federal government.
That would be you and me.
Holding the bag for it.
Right.
So, you know, this is financial fraud on top of the fraud on the fraud.
If I were to kind of envision a situation where the courts did overturn, say, a state like Pennsylvania, that would open up the floodgates, and we've been seeing a lot of fear around that.
What would happen in that case?
Well, I don't know how they've decided to do this.
Clearly, there's something financial in play here because when Trump was leading, oh, thank you.
There went my feedback.
When Trump was leading, we had, I think it was actually on Fox.
I don't remember what network first reported it.
I was getting emails of articles as all this was going on and trying to keep up.
But somebody reported that the Wan had crashed.
So, in other words, China knew something was up.
And interestingly enough, Putin and Xi are the major world leaders who have not sent congratulations to Mr. Bribin.
And I'm sorry for calling these people what they are.
What do you make of that?
Well, I make of it that China knows something, that something is up.
And they're not saying what it is because for the wand to crash means that they are terribly afraid that Trump gets in.
But now it crashed that night.
It crashed that night.
So the problem, I think, is they know something that they're not telling.
Now, I don't know how the wand has done since then.
If it's gone back up, if it's recovered what it lost on election night, I don't know.
I haven't looked at that.
But that tells me something's up, and the fact that Putin and Xi are still withholding their congratulations tells me something is up.
And I'll tell you what else tells me something is up, Daniel, and it's very bad if my suspicion is true, is when Nutty Yehu phoned congratulations to Bribin.
Yes.
You know, talk about a slam.
BB Netanyahu.
Yeah, BB Netanyahu.
I call him Nutty Yehu.
But the.
That tells me that he knows something.
And he's in a hurry to get Brian in there for some reason.
So there's lots going on here.
And of course, we know that Vice Chancellor Macron and Chancellor Merkel have phoned in their congratulations to Brian, too.
So there's something going on in the background here, and it's major.
And my suspicion is it has a great deal to do with this financial reset, and that they are literally trying to drive.
Tensions in this country to the max.
What about Justin Trudeau getting on board with that?
He's another one who joins the party.
Yeah, he's another one.
And, you know, we've seen what they're doing in Canada.
I mean, they are literally stripping Canadians of any civil rights that they have up in Canada.
I mean, they're even considering a bill in Canada to make church teaching on human sexuality a hate crime.
Wow.
Now, you know, I have a lot of bones to pick with churches, and including on some of that.
But, On the other hand, you don't disenfranchise a group of people just on the basis of their religion.
Because if you're going to do it to Christians, you're going to have to do it to Jews and Muslims and pretty much anybody else with any sort of traditional sexual morality.
So there's this wholesale assault, I think, on religion going on in the background of all of this, too.
But again, I think that's because they are trying to shut down any opposition speech that they can.
Because they're trying to pull off a financial reset in a major way, and they're in a hurry to do it.
And, you know, if things don't go their way in the Supreme Court, then they've got a problem.
And they already have a problem.
They have created a nightmare opposition now in terms of the grassroots Trump supporters within the GOP.
And the GOP itself is, you know, the old days of politics as normal with the GOP are over.
And there's a lot of people are just not getting that message.
And, you know, that doesn't bode well either.
I mean, everything is in tatters.
This is what amazes me about this election.
25th Amendment and Coup Plans00:15:08
We went to sleep living in the United States and we woke up in the Weimar Republic.
Yeah.
Well, let me ask you this.
And there's no doubt the shenanigans were on.
I would say the real kind of weird.
Things got really weird when Twitter censored the New York Post stories on Hunter Biden's laptop.
This was the first very strange thing when the New York Post decided, well, they were already censoring Trump on Twitter, which was weird enough, let's face it.
I mean, you're going to take a national figure who's leading the country, basically, leader of the free world, and little Twitter is going to start putting little bans on his tweets.
I mean, that was already strange enough.
And then the next thing that happens is.
The New York Post takes the dive and they put out the Hunter Biden laptop material, which is incredibly deep and scandalous and shows a kind of web of corruption around the Bidens.
In any case, it shows very unusual dealings with the Chinese.
Oh, yeah.
And then all of a sudden, the strangest thing happens.
This little weird tech company, Twitter, censors a major newspaper and doesn't allow them to post unless they take that story off.
This was unusual.
This was, I think, the shot across the bow.
Well, I think it's illuminative of the fact that this media mighty Wurlitzer is itself fighting itself.
Right.
Because the New York Post, in sitting on the Hunter Biden laptop thing for so long, and for that matter, FBI Director Ray, let's be honest here.
And I still have a question what's the provenance of this laptop?
Yes.
You know, everybody's jumping, you know, all the anti Biden people are jumping on the anti Biden train laptop, laptop, laptop.
And I'm wondering, okay, what's the provenance of it?
You know, the whole story makes no sense.
Yeah.
That Hunter leaves his laptop at this computer center for all this time.
Well, these people are not above employing doubles and sneaking into offices and stealing information.
Think Watergate folks.
But I'm worried about the whole provenance of this thing.
But lay that aside for a minute.
We've got this laptop that appears out of nowhere, and the timing of the release of the information about it.
To me, it is very, very fishy, especially with Dorsey's response over at Twitter.
That response is telling me that some people didn't want the laptop out because they were planning to use it against Mr. Bribin.
Because basically, that whole fam damn thing has been like the Bushes and the Clintons.
They've been running the United States government as a personal family grift.
Okay?
Right, right.
Yeah.
But the fact that Dorsey doesn't want any talk about it.
Right.
Don't you dare even mention it.
Yeah, which tells me that there's a segment that wants to shut that up completely and that the mighty Wurlitzer of the media machine is itself in conflict with itself.
Yes.
I mean, you know, how do you maintain any integrity if you're one of the known commentators at Fox, Hannity or Ingram?
You know, Ingram's gone off the deep end.
She's just telling Trump, you know, swallow it and accept it graciously.
Well, you know, Republicans have been accepting things graciously for 70 years, and where has it gotten them?
So I'm looking at this in utter disbelief.
Everybody's nuts.
Yes.
Everybody's freaking nuts.
Pardon my French.
Everyone, you're watching The Dark Journalist Show.
We're here with Dr. Joseph Farrell.
We're going deep on all the monkey business in the 2020 election, and as it turns out, Race is not over.
I mean, by any chance, imagination, regardless of what media company has called it.
One of the things I want to ask you about, and the minute I started to see it happen, I was like, Joseph's going to know what's going on here.
Maybe.
And it was in relation to some of the strange things we saw this man talking about.
Oh, boy.
The director, the drone pig himself, John Brennan.
He's been encouraging his fellow Republicans and people in the Trump administration.
To go ahead and sort of invoke the 25th Amendment in order to get rid of Trump, even in the supposed two months that he has left under this scenario.
We know the election's not called, so that's foolhardy.
But they're really pushing hard for that, and he keeps showing up saying, Oh, he might give away classified information.
Invoke the 25th.
We have to get him out.
Invoke the 25th.
He was so nervous in the CNN interview that his voice was peaking in ways I've never heard it before.
He was out of breath, too.
And so he really had to get this across.
There have been weird things going on along that line.
As soon as Trump got into his groove after that initial pushback in the election with people saying, well, he didn't win, then all of a sudden he fires Defense Secretary Mark Esper.
Esper, who has only come on fairly recently, he is the one who changed out the COG commander in August.
And now we have a strange, you know, they were both strange, but they made the guy who was only 55 retire and they put in Van Herk.
And we've already talked about in previous episodes the oddities around Van Herk that he commanded the 509th and things like that.
But There's no question that he's in charge of COG.
He's in charge of NORAD, North American Aerospace.
So, what are we looking at with Esper being the first one in the firing line as soon as Trump figures out the fraud that's taken place?
Not only is he the first one, but the second person to go was the legal counsel for the National Security Council.
Yes.
And he sends Grinnell out to Nevada.
Right.
DCI out to Nevada.
And, you know, we all know what's in Nevada besides voter fraud.
Right.
You got Area 51 and they got Area 31.
Yeah, exactly.
Look, I've even entertained the possibility that we're looking at some sort of continuity of government scenario.
Yes.
Because if they shut Trump off of all the media outlets for him to get any sort of countervailing message out there, he has the power to.
You know, basically go on the emergency broadcasting system and shut them down.
Yes.
And by the way, there are also FCC complaints now against these networks.
Yes.
So, I mean, we're watching a huge meltdown that to me looks like, yeah, they could try and impose some sort of continuity of government operation.
But the problem now is you might have two of them running at the same time, one for one party and another for another party.
So, you know, we're back to it.
It looks to me like they're trying deliberately to split the country.
And I've got bad news for those people in the Blue Counties.
You know, he who controls the land is pretty much he who controls the show if things get to that point.
And we've already seen truckers are promising strikes.
Yeah.
And the left is promising to interdict the truckers.
Yeah, right.
You know.
We're in a real Fort Sumter moment here.
And I don't see any way, quite frankly, I don't see any way of pulling this out without a lot of bumps along the road.
I really don't.
I really don't.
But, Esper, I think, to me, Daniel, the clue is when Trump went into his quarantine for COVID.
Remember what happened?
He gave that very, very strange talk.
Where he's sitting at a table and you're watching the flags go up and down and up and down, like he's on a ship somewhere.
Yeah.
Okay.
And then magically, the Joint Chiefs of Staff all get COVID.
Right.
So, yeah, I think something's going on there with the military.
And he's putting his people into places of power and authority because he, You know, he's reacting, he has been reacting like someone who has expected this.
Yes.
Well, he's unusually quiet.
Yeah.
During this, you know, especially over the weekend when people expected him to be out there, he's obviously reviewing the situation.
And his first actions are he gets rid of Esper.
There's another strange resignation of the woman who's in charge of a nuclear regulatory committee that actually handles where the nuclear weapons are.
That's another weird one.
Today, something else happened, and I don't know if you caught this yet, but I'm going to read it to you.
Before you get there, before you get there.
Yes.
Since you mentioned nuclear weapons, that move strikes me as we've got to get a hold of the football.
Now, I'm going to mention two things that people should remember in this respect.
The first is 9 11, when Bush the Stupid flew from Florida to Barksdale.
Right.
He jettisons the press crew, gives that really weird speech, which does not mention terrorism.
Exactly.
He talks about a test.
And there were nuclear drills on the day of 9 11.
Right.
And then there were phone calls to the White House where people were allegedly revealing all sorts of top secret code names.
And then Barksdale scoots up to Offutt Air Force Base, which is the command and control center for all of America's strategic nuclear forces.
Barksdale was the backup for all of our strategic nuclear forces.
So, I'm with Webster Tarpley here.
It looks to me like Bush was reasserting personal presidential control over the nation's nuclear forces.
Right.
Okay, because the way I'm reading it, somebody may have had or hacked, so to speak, the ability to launch.
And Bush's one phone call that day to a world leader was to remember to Vladimir Putin.
Yes.
All right.
That's the first thing to remember.
The second thing to remember is.
During, I think it was 2008, somewhere around 2008 to 2010, we heard about all of those nuclear weapons that had mysteriously been transhipped from Minot, North Dakota down to Barksdale.
And no one could figure out who signed the order to do this.
Why are these nuclear weapons suddenly here when they should be there?
And then the other thing was that very weird press conference on April 1st this year when Trump was there with Dr. Grouchy and What's her name?
But the conference starts out with General Milley, I think it was, talking about this Caribbean operation that the Navy and the Coast Guard, pardon me, bad sign is all last week, had deployed massive amounts of ships in the Caribbean, the most ships since the Cuban Missile Crisis, which was another little clue to my mind.
And then Milley says, Oh, yeah, and we've sent about 6,000 soldiers.
To do what?
That's a lot.
That's a lot.
That's not a drug interdiction, folks.
Right.
And then he says, You're not getting in.
And he repeated those exact words twice You're not getting in.
And it sounds to me like someone may have been trying to smuggle in a firecracker and, you know, set it off one more thing.
So I think there's something very suspicious about this lady in the middle of all of this.
I'm, you know, I'm out.
No question.
Yeah.
Well, that is fascinating because it looks like some of this, especially with Esper getting fired, that when Trump supposedly got COVID, as you said, it was an unusual sequence of events there.
And he came back better than ever in like three days.
Which is a magical three days.
Rising from the COVID tomb.
But here's what's interesting about that it seems like.
And you raised the possibility at the time that there was a coup activity in place.
And this could be the COG action.
And the getting rid of Esper might be connecting the dots up here.
He was, since he had just switched out the COG commander in August, Trump had connected the dots and said, that's the guy who was planning it.
My first action upon hearing that I'm in election limbo is getting rid of this guy.
Yep.
Yep.
I read it exactly the same way.
I'm reading it exactly the same way.
There has been.
We know that there has been more or less an ongoing coup attempt for four years.
So, to expect that they have changed their game plan in the last two weeks, no.
We're looking at the latest update to it.
So, yeah, I think you're looking at countermeasures on Trump's part, which, if that's the case, means he's getting some pretty good counterintelligence from somewhere.
Justice Alito and Lost Support00:13:07
And the question is, where?
So Clapper comes along, like you say, or Brennan, pardon me, and says, Well, we've got to invoke the 25th Amendment.
The reason why is Don Jr. is out there saying declassify everything.
Yes.
Just show these people for what they are, put the information out there and do it.
And he can do it.
Yeah.
And my suspicion is, you know, reading the tea leaves here, Daniel, is that.
If Trump is responding to internal threats, as we're speculating, then they're worried about the NSA and all the signals intelligence.
In other words, there's somebody in the NSA, possibly the DIA or whatever, that's feeding Trump information.
He's not coming up with this on his own.
And he's not coming up with this on the basis of his own private security services.
Somebody else is in the mix here that we have not yet seen step onto the stage.
Absolutely.
And sorry to interrupt you, but we've just now had these reports of this scorecard and Dominion software and all of this stuff being hooked up to the internet.
Right.
So who's going to be monitoring that, folks?
Yeah, right.
Well, it's interesting because they have Sidney Powell out there, who, as we know, is the attorney for General Flynn, and he's now taking this up on the voter fraud side on behalf of the Trump administration.
You have Giuliani moving the cases into the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, counting mystery ballots after the fact, unusual things like that.
You have Justice Alito saying, oh, you know what?
Segregate those votes.
Put them aside, separate them.
That's extreme.
And then it comes around again that they haven't done it, and he comes in and he says it again.
Go ahead and do it.
Make sure you do it.
So we already have the Supreme Court involved and curious and saying, what's going on there?
Yeah.
Well, and I've heard that Pennsylvania's response was, well, we can't do it.
Oh.
And they're offering all sorts of excuses as to why.
Now, whether the story is true or not, I don't know.
I've been like you.
I've been getting a blizzard of articles from people.
And it's coming in so fast that you can't keep up with it.
Yes.
But Pennsylvania, according to one of the articles I saw, just basically told Justice Alito, you know, Take a long walk off of a short period.
We can't do it.
Well, okay, if you can't do it, if you've already discarded those ballots, then you're in deep, deep doo-doo.
Yes.
Of all the people who came up with the very same point, and I didn't expect this: Ken Starr.
Uh-huh.
Ken Starr comes out and he says, everything that they did in Pennsylvania was not constitutional.
You bring that into the Supreme Court, they'll throw the whole election out in Pennsylvania.
Uh-huh.
And the Trump forces are counting on the fact that they will see that counting all night until they stopped, and then the mystery ballot action, the segregated stuff, that mess.
And they'll just say, you know what?
Any vote after 8 o'clock, forget it.
Well, the problem with what they did in shutting those counts I mean, there's all sorts of videos out online right now, Daniel, by accountants, mathematicians, and so on, pointing out that Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania are.
Are creating these, these votes literally spiking, you know, almost perpendicular, 100,000 votes for Joe Biden and not one in that sample for Trump.
Right.
That is statistically impossible.
Yeah.
It's just, you know, it's beyond the pale.
So my question again is why the obvious in your face blatant fraud?
And I can only, only reach two conclusions here.
Number one, the, the, Plutocrats, Mr. Globaloney, is so confident.
And this is another in your face JFK assassination style.
There's nothing you can do about it.
We're giving you a BS explanation and live with it.
And so, in other words, it's a psychological operation to demoralize people even more.
Or it's a case where, you know, the Democratic Party was ordered to fall on its sword and elect a senile dotard and a grifter and.
Whatever Camel Harris is, to run a campaign that wasn't a campaign that had nobody showing.
You and I have seen how many campaigns.
When we've watched them close, that's, I mean, that was no campaign that they were doing.
You have to.
No, I go back to Nixon and Kennedy.
I remember that one.
I'm good on the Ross Perot one.
Okay.
Yeah, that was a real corker.
But yeah, I mean, whatever it was that Biden was running, it was not a campaign.
Nobody showing up to his rallies.
I'm sorry.
That tells me right there that they didn't have the votes.
Yeah.
You know, there's no two ways about it.
They don't have the votes.
This is fraud.
This is in your face.
So the other scenario is why is the Democratic Party falling on its sword and committing suicide?
Right.
Um, And that raises all sorts of issues about whatever's going on behind Trump.
Yes.
You know, why is Fox News joining their party?
Who knows?
This I can't figure out.
What's Murdoch's goal here?
Is it to return to the status quo antebellum where the Republicans play nice and pretend to be an opposition party and we just continue to creep and move gradually left all the time?
I don't know.
It's so beyond any analysis because we don't know all the players lurking in the background.
That's the problem.
And we don't know what their agendas are other than.
You know, they want to get rid of the United States and get everybody chipped and take their lousy vaccines and roll out digital currencies for everybody.
Right.
Beyond this, we don't know what's going on.
To me, it's highly significant that Putin and Xi are still not budging.
And the real question is let's play a scenario out here.
This goes to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court says, okay, massive voter fraud in Arizona.
Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and so on and so forth.
And Trump claims victory, and then Xi and Putin recognize Trump.
Now, how is the left wing media going to spin that?
That would be something to say.
Yeah, they would literally melt down before our eyes.
Yeah, they would.
They would.
I mean, if we see them crying at Biden's false election, then I'm sure we're going to see them cry if they lose it.
Okay, and suppose they come out in favor of Biden.
What is that going to do to the Trump people?
Yeah.
We told you all along.
Right.
You know Russian politics better than anyone that I know.
And you.
That's bad.
Because I don't know it.
I've got my guesses, and that's all they are.
I mean, the Kremlin is like one of those Chinese boxes, Daniel.
You know, you have to open it up part by part and in exactly the right order, or you're going to get it all wrong.
Anyone who can talk about Yuri Andropov knows more than just about anybody else.
But I would say this that you, with that geopolitical eye and Putin, looking into Putin and what he's up to, what are you seeing just in him not acknowledging it?
But he's not willing to say Joe Biden's the president elect yet.
Well, what I see Putin doing there is he's being the KGB analyst and he's sitting back and waiting to see how this is going to play out.
And trust me, the Russians have already gamed it out.
They've already got the communication that he's going to communicate either to Trump or Biden already written.
And they're waiting to see what happens.
Now, here's a funny thing.
In the midst of all of this election fraud brouhaha, Putin made a little announcement.
Did you catch it?
That he's stepping down next year for reasons of health?
Yes.
Well, he came out and tried to deny that after it slipped out.
Yeah.
So it's clear that it seemed like it was a good report.
And then all of a sudden, he was prompted to deny it.
What do you think of it?
There are several ways to analyze it.
Either he's lost support within the FSB, Federal Naya Shlujba Bezopesnosti.
Either he's lost support there and they're going to put in a hardliner.
Take that for what it's worth.
Or he's lost out to the financial powers in Russia that have been arrayed against him.
Yeah.
This could be a typical Russian obfuscation thing where he has no intention of resigning, puts it out, and then recants it.
The story's put out, and then he recants it to leave the West guessing as to just what Russia is going to do, which wouldn't be unlike them to do.
So it's anyone's guess, but I suspect that Putin and Xi have been burning the phone lines as to how they're going to respond to all of this.
And The keys here, I think, to watch are other places.
Mexico has already said, no, we're not, you know.
I suspect you're going to see some other countries say the same thing.
They're holding back to see how this plays out.
I mean, if the scenario really is to split the United States, then they've got to decide who they're going to support.
Right.
Absolutely.
Yeah, this is 1861 all over again.
You know, Britain and France supporting the Confederacy kind of quietly.
Just to see how it goes, you know.
And Tsar Alexander II sending the Russian fleet over here.
Well, I know how it's going to go if you guys get involved.
So, yeah, everybody's watching, and we're seeing them choose up sides.
And it's very interesting to see how they're choosing up because Merkel and Macron, of course, are big globalists.
Right.
And Putin, you know, contrary to that, has been.
Very much anti global.
I mean, just look at his speeches the last few years.
So I'm seeing all the signals that the international community is sending, and what they're saying is this election is really about globalism versus nationalism.
You know, just exactly what Trump said in 2016.
Are we going to continue to let this country be run by a plutocracy with no regard for the Constitution and rule of law, and for that matter, Europe as well, or are we going to go with a genuine national sovereignty movement?
And interestingly enough, look at Bojo in the United Kingdom.
Defense Nomination Controversy00:03:39
Who did he come out right away?
Biden.
Yes, absolutely.
He was all over that.
He was all over it.
Yeah.
You would think they would have held off for sure.
Oh, yeah, absolutely.
Absolutely.
So that tells me the fix is in, you know, that, that, uh, The city and the British oligarchy and intelligence services have some sort of vested interest in a Biden win.
And that ought to give everybody pause.
They don't call her perfide Albion for nothing, you know.
Great.
The setup around.
I want to bring in the COG part a little bit.
Sure.
And I'm going to do it backwards.
I'm going to take COG now and roll it backwards.
Here's the now part.
Controversial official who pushed conspiracy theories taking top Pentagon policy role.
This is a story from today on CNN and others.
And I've been watching this guy for a while.
It's very interesting.
It's General Tata.
Controversial retired Brigadier General Anthony Tata is being moved into the Pentagon's top policy role, taking over the duties of James Anderson, who resigned Tuesday.
Tata was previously nominated to be Undersecretary of Defense for Policy this summer, but his nomination was withdrawn because of bipartisan opposition.
CNN's K file reported that he had made numerous Islamophobic and offensive comments and promoted, quote, conspiracy theories.
After the withdrawal of his nomination, Tata was designated the official performing the duties of the Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, reporting to Anderson.
Anderson resigned Tuesday, according to two defense officials, a day after President Trump fired Secretary of Defense Mark Esper and replaced him with Christopher Miller.
Now, interestingly enough, Tata went on record saying that Obama was a terrorist.
This is one of his controversial comments.
What are we to make of him assuming this role and this kind of setup with Esper going down, this guy coming into prominence?
It seems like Trump is assembling his team and they're assembling theirs.
Is that correct?
I would say that, yes, and I would go further.
To look at Antifa and BLM and the whole Soros network, there's no doubt in my mind that at some point they're plugged into radical Islamist cells in this country.
So, in other words, I'm looking at it once again from the standpoint that this appointment is coming out of some sort of counterintelligence.
That Trump or his immediate circle of advisors may have access to.
And as far as I can guess, if that speculation be true, my guess would be it's coming from somewhere within the NSA or it's coming from the DIA, possibly some combination of the two, and maybe even out of the National Reconnaissance Office in some crazy set of circumstances.
Right.
Counterintelligence Resignations00:11:58
But that's my guess here, is that these appointments and visits.
Resignations are not accidental.
They have all the trappings to me of lining your counterintelligence ducks up in a row and getting them ready.
And that tells me they're expecting things to go hot, quite frankly.
Yeah.
Wow.
Unbelievable.
That's the impression.
I've never seen so much military shuffling after election disputes.
I mean, this is a very unusual circumstance.
Oh, totally.
He said.
God help the nation if Trump gets a yes man in there.
Well, you know, we've had yes men in there that have created this mess that we're in.
You know, there was no evidence for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Right.
And we had a bunch of yes men in Congress, with maybe the exception of Senator Wellstone.
You know, you know what happened to him.
Forgive me.
Went down in a plane crash.
He went down in a convenient plane crash.
He was the deciding vote there, yeah.
Yeah, yeah, he was.
And so they got rid of him.
I go back to the fact that we're in the mess we're in because we have a bunch of yes men on both sides of the aisle.
I've said it before, I'll say it again.
The Republicans haven't got two testicles in the same sack in the whole congressional delegation.
And they've been the party of false opposition for decades.
Thank you, Dwight Eisenhower.
But yeah, every president needs yes men.
I mean, You know, you need people that are going to follow your orders.
What's the big deal?
You know, I'm not upset about Trump putting his people in place.
I'm not upset about any president putting their people in place.
That's what presidents do, that's what presidents should do.
Right.
We've got to get out of this mentality that the permanent bureaucracy runs things.
They don't.
We do.
We do.
And that's the problem here.
They're so used to it.
Washington, D.C., is effectively Venice, it's a city state unto itself, and everybody else serves them.
And that's governance by bureaucracy, in spite of what's going on in the public show.
And that's got to stop.
That's why we're in the mess we're in.
We've got all of these think tanks, we've got all of these congressmen in name only rubber stamping the decisions of these think tanks, which are the ones making actual policy.
Remember, the project for a new American century, the thing that everybody quotes in regard to 9 11, that was not an official body of any sort whatsoever.
It was a bunch of people in the federal bureaucracy and in the corporate world getting together to decide what our policy is going to be for the next century and how well it has worked out, too.
Exactly.
These people are fundamentally stupid.
This is the problem.
So if Trump wants to clean the swamp and put his people in place, I don't blame him.
I don't blame him.
There's a couple of very interesting things there.
One of them is, well, Coming into this election and with the people that he had, first of all, a president, more often than not as an incumbent, is going to get reelected because he has all of the accoutrement of power there and he is able to direct federal agencies in all kinds of different ways in a favorable situation.
He can also, he has the bully pulpit and he can make great foreign policy deals as Trump was making a lot of deals in relation to Saudi Arabia and all the rest and peace in the Middle East, supposedly.
But certainly he had enough going on that side.
The COVID thing seemed to be sort of a 50 50 split in the country.
They thought, well, the Democrats might do better or Trump might do better.
Didn't seem like anyone really regarded the Democrats as great experts on this as far as voting goes.
You have to go back all the way to 1992 to find an incumbent who was not reelected.
And we know that that was because Bush had been in there with Reagan for 12 years.
And particularly bad economic year.
And they sort of made a deal with Clinton, you know, and Ross Perot came in and bump.
So that was pretty easy.
I mean, Clinton wins with 42% of the vote.
It wasn't anywhere near 50%.
But it's interesting, if you go back all the way back to Carter, you know, he's another one-termer, but he's way back there.
That's 1979, 1980 election.
And he has the Iranian hostage crisis.
He's naturally going to get thrown out.
But Reagan is a two-termer.
Clinton's a two-termer.
Obama's a two-termer.
Bush is a two-termer because they have the power of the office, not because things are going so great during their election year.
So Trump naturally had the advantage going into the election.
Yeah.
Which is another reason why this doesn't make any sense logically.
No.
Just from setting aside all of Trump's problems, his abrasive personality, and all the stuff that we hear, this is a stolen election.
At least it's an attempted steal.
And that should upset everybody.
Because if an unelected, moneyed elite, and if a compliant and complicit media can sell people on a narrative that is blatantly untrue, and contrary to every mathematical, statistical model I'm aware of, if they can sell people on that, they can get away with everything and the country is gone.
That's the importance here.
That's the importance.
I don't care if you're Republican or Democrat, that's what's going on here.
And, you know, we've got to remember something else about all of this.
We have been watching for four years centrist Democrats either abandoning the party altogether or saying that they're going to vote for Trump because their party has abandoned them.
So tell me how Joe Bribin and his grifting family.
Are able to garner these kinds of votes when it is clear that he's up to his earlobes in some very dubious and I would aver felonious activity, if not treasonous activity, on the part of his family and his son and China and the Ukraine and on and on we could go.
This is a very serious situation.
So, whether you like Trump or not, my personal reasons for I'm a very reluctant Trump supporter, I'll admit that.
But my personal reasons for looking at this election fraud have nothing whatsoever to do with Trump.
It has everything to do with the stability and probity of our institutions.
That's the issue for me.
No question.
And if they get away with this, then the institutions have no probity.
If the Republicans think they're going to magically help ditch Trump and then take over in 2022 or 2024, they've got another thing coming.
Yeah.
Because they're going to find their support has evaporated just like Fox News' ratings have.
Right, right.
It's that clear.
Amazing.
Everyone, you're watching The Dark Journalist Show.
We're going deep here with Dr. Joseph Farrell.
Dr. Farrell's work is available at Giza Death Star.
And, you know, his recent books, Joseph, the recent books you did on Joseph McCarthy.
Oh, aren't they kind of timely now?
And I'd like to point out that, in fact, as we know, that deep connection of McCarthy and Roy Cohn comes back in a very strange way now because we have Roy Cohn's political protege fighting for his political life.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Building all of those different strains of a swamp.
Well, I think I saw an editorial recently that Trump's problem was he came into office rather naive, thinking that everybody's going to play by the rules.
And when I was reading this editorial, I was thinking, wait a minute.
You don't do business with Roy Cohn and end up naive.
Right, exactly.
It's not possible.
Right.
Cohn was the ultimate.
He was, yeah.
I mean, talk about the viper and the snake pit.
Oh, my.
Not to mention Trump's close relationship, which finally got revealed with Richard Nixon.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
And it's interesting that that came out.
We reported it here on this show as far back as 2017.
But it's interesting that it came out in mainstream consciousness this fall.
Yeah.
Ain't it interesting?
The letters were found, you know.
Oh, wow.
Surprise.
I mean, you've been covering that for years.
Right.
And, oh, by the way, we're on top of things here at Faux News.
Mike Pompeo went to the Nixon Library to go read them.
It's a very unusual kind of presence there looking through these letters.
I thought that was quite fascinating, too.
Trump's in a situation now where he's fought them off Russian collusion, the Ukrainian collusion.
That whole situation where they try to throw him out of office and impeach him.
They've spent lots of money on that.
They try to make him look like a spy.
They've said he's a racist and all the.
They've done a series of things to take him out.
None of them worked.
And now finally they have this opportunity of the COVID and the mail in ballots and they can switch out this election.
So now they have him in a position where he has to fight for his life through the Supreme Court and all the rest in order to maintain his power and to maintain the presidency.
If they were successful in removing him from the presidency, would the next move be to try to prosecute Trump on some trumped up charge?
Now, I've seen them go after, and they just opened up an investigation of the Hatch Act of Trump using government resources for his reelection campaign.
Should we expect more of that if the Biden regime comes in?
Oh, sure.
Absolutely.
Bribing will shut down every investigation of.
And all of that stuff, including himself.
He will use his power to shut all of that down.
But don't think for a moment that they aren't going to go after Trump.
Why?
Globalism Versus Nationalism00:02:45
Because Bribin is Mr. Globalone's candidate.
And if there's nothing else we've learned in the last four years, Mr. Globalone hates Donald Trump.
Oh, yeah.
Okay.
And yeah, nationalism doesn't go with globalism.
And they have got to make an example of him.
To everybody, you know, to all of us deplorables out here, they've got to make an example of him so that we never do that again and you stay in your place.
Right.
I've got bad news for him if they think that's going to happen.
Because you're watching, you know, you're watching Europe explode.
Yes.
With the code, you know, the bottom line here, people, is that Mr. Global only realizes that his big global crony capitalism game is not working for most people.
And most people are waking up and sort of beginning to see it.
When they realize that it's, you know, these central banksters, World Trade Organization, IMF, and all of this claptrap that's really behind all of this, then they're in trouble because they have near the numbers.
This is why they've got to get, you know, they've got to disarm this country, number one.
But number two, they've got to make absolutely sure that they are in control of their own militaries.
Just look at Britain.
Look what's happened in Britain.
Just in the last two weeks, Britain has taken back control of its nuclear forces from the American corporations that were running it, and they're nationalizing their nuclear weapons industry.
What does that tell you?
That tells me that.
Something is in the works, and Britain is now afraid of the direction the United States might go.
Yes.
So, you know, you're watching all the geopolitical signals that they know something is going on in the background here, and it's huge.
It's huge.
Absolutely.
Wow.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
We're here with Dr. Joseph Farrell and going deep on the deep state monkey business for the election, and all the false calling by the media is so big, brother.
I literally.
As low as I think of the media, I've never seen anything like the nonsense that they've been peddling with the calls that they've made.
And that they would look at the same maps that you and I can look at and see the votes in the different states, and that they would try to create this kind of false momentum for Biden, even using the fake votes, they weren't quite able to make these calls ordinarily.
Vaccine Narrative Integrity00:05:06
So they just made them anyway Arizona in these different states.
And Pennsylvania, a very unusual situation.
That's when they get around it.
You know, they're so worried about somebody questioning the integrity of the election.
All of a sudden, Twitter and Facebook have all these warnings.
Oh, this questions the integrity of the election.
The charge is disputed.
This is a false claim.
You know, they're all over it, which tells you that they cannot have people thinking about this.
This is what they're most nervous about.
Exactly.
You know, looking at Fox News, or as I like to call it, faux news.
The signal that they were going to create a narrative was for me written all over the place in the way that their major commentators, particularly Sean Vanity, were commenting about the COVID plan scandemic.
Because he, in his radio talk show for weeks, was going on and on about the safety of masks and so on and so forth.
There was no attempt.
On his part, to present a countervailing or contraindicating scientific narrative about the health and safety of masks.
None.
And that's true of my local Fox radio affiliate where I live.
They're doing local press conferences every day almost with our rhino mayor talking about cases, cases, cases.
And, you know, how this wonderful mask mandate that he's put into place in the city is working.
You know, it's really helping.
But there's no countervailing attempt to, pardon me, there's no attempt to present the counterindicating science whatsoever.
And that was the clue to me that, okay, he is on a national platform and he's going along with a segment of the narrative.
And on occasion, he was even kind of whiffy waffly until he finally clarified that he was against any national vaccine mandate.
And that, to me, Daniel, more than any other issue, if there was an issue that hurt Trump, it was precisely parading Fauci and Burks week after week in their masks.
Talking about vaccines, vaccines, vaccines, and then talking about getting the military to distribute.
If there was anything that hurt him, that was it.
Yes, absolutely.
Because it also ran against the idea that they had blown this thing up in the first place.
Right.
Which he could have gotten to the bottom of.
So he failed there.
Right.
And they used it against him.
This is the interesting thing.
They're willing to hang that around his neck.
Right.
Well, he did not respond.
In my opinion, well, to that whole thing at all.
And I'm kind of with Catherine Fitz here.
He allowed all of these shutdowns.
He could have shut down the shutdowns like that.
Okay.
So, you know, part of me thinks that, you know, he was, again, naive and too trusting and thinking, well, science, you know, I've got to listen to the scientists.
Well, you know, the problem is science is not that settled.
Right.
So there were no people around him preventing a countervailing narrative until, you know, August when he finally kind of distanced himself.
From Dr. Grouchy and those people, or Fausti, as I like to call him sometimes.
But there was no attempt to distance himself from that narrative until very late in the game.
And I think if there was anything that did hurt him, it was that.
But Fox, to me, started signaling they were on board with all of this because of the way that some of their major commentators, like Hannity, were talking about the whole thing.
Absolutely.
That's fascinating.
And you know what really grabs me about this is when you look out at what they've been up to with the whole COVID operation, you get into this thing where Trump is working to get this vaccine in a blitz in order to get the political fanfare that he's got a cure.
And then a week or less than a week after he is in this struggle and the elections has been played out and all the rest, and they're trying to create this president elect.
Biden thing.
Pfizer comes out and says, Oh, we have a 90% vaccine.
It's perfect.
And Fauci comes out and says, This is great.
This is all going to work out now.
And Biden says, Oh, the coronavirus is the main thing.
I've got a task force and everyone's going to wear a federally mandated mask and all the rest.
So they've got their plan pretty rock solid.
And so Trump was a fool in a sense to go along with the whole vaccine creation, warp speed nonsense because they actually ended up using that against him and not.
Not giving him the prize of having it out in time.
Uneven Election Seats00:15:39
Right, right.
And voila, worst COVID lately.
Yeah.
You know, right off the map.
You know, and folks, I genuinely think that, you know, if Biden wins, they're going to try and couple COVID to federal relief.
You know, get your vaccine, get your Auschwitz number tattooed on your arm, and we'll be nice to you.
Yes.
Yeah, exactly.
It's crystal clear to me what they're up to.
They're trying to split the country or lock it down.
One of the two.
And either way, I don't think it turns out well for them because I think there's going to be pushback like they've never seen.
I mean, you know, it's Zolzhenitsyn all over again before the Soviet judge.
Why do you keep interfering with us so much?
Well, Zolzhenitsyn's answer was well, when you take everything away from somebody, what do you have left to lose?
Right.
You know, that's putting it where it is.
That's putting it where it is.
You know, I was struggling financially.
I'm still struggling.
Financially, but really struggling under Obamacare.
I mean, I was worried that I was going to lose everything because I cannot afford that crap.
And at some point, when they keep passing policies that are against the middle class to wipe it out, they're going to have some pushback one way or the other.
And they may have all the nukes and all that stuff, but you roll the war dice and all plans go right out the window.
So, these people are playing with fire, and they're not afraid to do so either.
Let's note that.
Somehow, they don't seem, it's like they've gone into a kamikaze mode.
They don't seem to be afraid of losing the credibility.
They don't seem to be afraid of losing the credibility of the election.
Right.
And they just want to get back into those power seats by any means possible.
Right.
Right.
Because then they don't have to worry about credibility.
And, you know, this is an existential crisis sort of election.
That's why there's so much writing on this fraud, both for them and for the people trying to expose it.
Because you're dealing quite literally with a cabal.
There's no two ways about it.
And the problem for the Republicans is they have been such wimps for decades that they're now put in a position, like it or not, that they're going to have to fight.
Right.
They are going to have to fight.
All of a sudden, I mean, look at Lindsey Graham Cracker.
All of a sudden, he's got a spine.
Right, yeah.
Where did that come from?
Was it there all along?
Or did it just grow?
You know, it's going to be interesting.
It's going to be interesting.
And, you know, the fraud is so blatant.
How, you know, Nasty Pig Losey, the Democrats were planning to pick up all these Senate seats and all these House seats.
Whoops!
That didn't materialize too well.
And the problem for the Republicans is they're going to have to deliver.
Yeah.
They're going to have to deliver.
No more bipartisanship.
You know, look where that guy is.
You're right.
You know, what's fascinating when you mention that also is this is a very uneven election, as you noted.
Well, it's interesting.
Yeah, go ahead.
I go to Comicaze on Trump, but they lose seats in the House.
They don't pick up any seats in the Senate.
Well, maybe we're still, you know, there's still runoff elections there and possible voter fraud with columns, you know.
We don't know what the Senate is, really.
But the House, yeah, the House, they hemorrhaged.
Yeah.
You know, That's unheard of too, because usually if an incumbent is running for a second term, the tendency has always been for the opposing party to pick up seats in the House.
That didn't happen.
How does that work?
Yeah, how does that work?
This is the dead giveaway.
That's another thing that was at work.
We mentioned, we just touched on the hammer and scorecard software.
There have been a couple of retired NSA generals who have come out talking about this.
And like I mentioned, Sidney Powell is on this for the Trump administration.
That kind of software and its effect on these elections, when you see those fast spikes and vertical spikes, and when they have these actual scientific models about how numbers work and how they don't work this way, and then you get this strange leap in votes.
So they were employing, and it's not like they never have before, but they were in a kind of super califragilistic way employing these.
Softwares, and now we get a real look at how you flip over an election.
But the problem is the footprints are out there, and you have ex NSA general type people talking about it.
That's a problem for them.
That's a huge problem for them because, okay, let's look at what we've got here.
We've got this Dominion software, which has been known for years to have problems, used in 30 states, including all of the so called swing states that are.
Being contested right now.
Right.
You know, I really think Pencil Slovakia is just the tip of the iceberg.
If they get going on Wisconsin and Michigan, where again, you have clear fraud, if they get going on those, the problem is Dominion Software is tied to Nasty Pig Lossy.
Her husband, I believe, is a major shareholder in it.
Soros.
Yes.
You know, all these people are tied with this software.
Think back to Herbert Walker, Poppy Bush, and the Diebold software and voting machines, and the convenient connection of John Sununu to that company.
Right.
You know, this voting stuff is in the hands of corporations, which are in the hands of people who have political agendas.
Exactly.
So, you know, I'm all for go back to paper ballots.
If you want to stuff the ballot, then you got to sit there and do like those people in Pennsylvania, stamping them and hurriedly filling in Biden and then, you know, doing it as fast as they can because we need 500,000 of them in four hours, guys.
Or you lose Pennsylvania.
Or you lose Pennsylvania.
Yeah.
Trump had an 800,000 vote lead.
Yeah.
He stopped counting.
You can't get past that.
No, you can't.
And then all of a sudden, after the counting closes and we find ballots we haven't counted, then magically it evaporates.
Yeah.
And the problem there is the trend in those discovered ballots should statistically break down more or less evenly.
And they're not.
That's the key right there to my mind.
Because if you look at the trend lines, if you graph them out, they're not conforming to any random statistical pattern that you would expect.
That's the problem.
Yes.
And that's a major problem.
It's a huge problem.
Absolutely.
So, we have a few factors here.
We have the big brother media approach saying, accept these results, President elect Biden, don't look at the fact that these other states had weird calls, don't look at the fact that the Supreme Court's looking into it.
That's one factor.
And you get the weird COG factor moving in.
And rumors, and even rumors that I've heard from pretty good sources about December and COG.
And then Trump getting rid of Esper, the nuclear agency woman, getting down or getting fired, being pushed out.
And then Brennan, who was really working hard to remove Trump before he got in.
Yes.
Stepping forward at what should be the end of the Trump administration, according to him.
Biden's already won, but he wants Trump out.
He wants them out now.
He wants them out now.
Right.
What are these factors adding up together into if you put in this weird software overlay of basically NSA intelligence software being used to flip an election the way we might if we went into a banana republic?
You know, if we didn't like the way that voting in Guatemala was going, we might flip it there.
And they've used this banana republic technique on us, and it's known.
Well, all of it adds up to me that.
Mr. Global only is desperate.
It goes back to what we've discussed many times before.
They're on some sort of schedule for whatever reason, and they need to get certain things done, or the entire schedule and perhaps the entire plan goes out the window.
And I genuinely get that impression, especially from Brennan and this crazy announcement.
I get the impression that if he's in a hurry, they're in a hurry.
They cannot afford to let this thing string out because the longer it strings out, the more people wake up.
And I want to mention a book for your listeners if they're not aware of it.
It's a book by Kevin and Philip Collins, I think it was, called Vote Scam.
And it's a book that came out, I think, in 1988 about the voting fraud in Dade County, Florida.
And this, by the way, is incidentally before the 2000 meltdown between Bush the Stupid and the Treehugger.
Okay, meaning Al Gore.
This was way before that.
But it's a book on how the voting machine companies were in league with networks to call elections and suppress votes by their election calls and obviously stuff ballots.
And it's an essential book for what's going on right now.
This has been known for some time, all of this stuff.
It's been known for some time.
It's just now, as you say, we're seeing it applied on a national level.
Scale, on a coordinated scale.
If you have swing states all coincidentally calling a halt to counts and then magically discovering all of these votes for Biden and not one of them for Trump, that tells you the fix is in.
And I don't think they're going to get away with it.
They may succeed in putting Biden in, but like I say, he will be an absolutely weak and ineffective president.
He will be a marionette, and so will Kamala Harris.
Oh, yeah.
I mean, she hasn't got two neurons and synapses that line up.
So, you know, she, yeah, she's going to be a complete marionette.
So somebody's going to be behind the strings.
And, you know, there's no question about it.
She was such a terrible candidate that she didn't get any votes in the primary.
She's literally a figurehead.
They were like, oh, you know, we'll have a person of color who's a woman and just, you know, put them in there.
And she is not going to give them any trouble.
Right, exactly.
Because they're going to have her on the cover of Vogue and stuff.
Right, sure.
But it's interesting what you're saying here about Biden because it's pretty strange because it's very hard.
First of all, it was hard to believe that Biden would get through the process of the Democratic primaries where he was fumbling and his vote totals were the worst and Bernie Sanders was killing him.
Yeah.
Then, right around Super Tuesday, something strange happened.
Which is almost like everyone got that little thing in their ear.
COVID's coming, get out of the race.
Right.
We'll give you a nice position in the Biden administration.
Right.
We suddenly had people who were beating him, like Bernie, like Elizabeth Warren, even Booty Gig.
He was doing it.
And now all those people are around the Biden administration.
So the call was made, we can handle this.
Yeah, I have to laugh at your Booty Gig.
Good old Pete.
Yeah, good old Pete.
That's too good.
I'll remember that one, Daniel.
That's right up there with Nasty Pig Losey.
But anyway.
No, yeah, you're exactly right.
The whole primary thing in the Democratic Party is such a fix, anyway.
I mean, think of Hillary in the Iowa caucus.
It's such a joke to think that anything in that party is genuinely representative.
I'm not taking away the Republicans and their ability to euchre things.
Think Eisenhower again.
The fact of the matter is that we have possibly just elected a president who's not only a grifter and a dotard and possibly even a pedophile.
Who knows?
I mean, those videos of him, you know, mewing over little girls is a little creepy, if I put it mildly.
Between that and Hunter, they're pretty good candidates for cops, for sure.
Well, yeah.
Not only that, but this guy, as far as I'm concerned, basically has sold his soul to China.
So, you know, we've elected a Chinese asset, possibly.
And the bottom line for me, I saw a cartoon recently, Daniel, of Joe Biden in an airline pilot's uniform.
And the caption was Would you trust this man if you were flying an airplane with him, if he were the pilot of your airplane?
Answer No.
No.
I told my friend that sent me that cartoon.
Chinese Asset Economic Models00:06:40
That I wouldn't even trust it if it was on Lufthansa.
But anyway, yeah, it's craziness.
And, you know.
If you saw Biden in the street, you'd be looking for his home health aid.
I mean, come on.
Yeah, exactly.
And, you know, all he is is a caretaker to make sure the swamp doesn't get drained and that business, you know, the business of grifting the country goes on as usual.
Well, let's take a quick snapshot of Trump and the four years that he's been in.
And regardless of what happens, he's had this track record.
He may survive through this battle with the Supreme Court and all the things that he can put across.
That map is still up in the air, and I show the map because that's basically where the race is at right now.
So it could go either way.
And I certainly haven't said, oh, Trump won on the map.
It's just that the map shows an advantage for Trump, but nobody's won yet.
Right.
But if you go through Michigan and Wisconsin, you probably get a Trump win if you look at it for real.
Right.
Now, if we look at Trump, though, He really worked hard to get that relationship with China out.
Right.
He had a totally different relationship with China.
Google, Facebook, Obama, that crowd, Biden, they were on the gravy train.
Professor Scott likes to call that gravy train the middle manager's gravy train and the neoliberal gravy train.
They're in there with China.
So they're getting all that money, they're transferring companies over there.
It's easy to get cheap labor over there.
And if you work them 14 hours a day, they just jump out the window and land in a net.
It's no problem.
His approach with China, Trump's, was absolutely revolutionary in relation to any other president.
The only person I can think of who flexed any muscle like that in terms of sovereignty, maybe, was Reagan.
Right.
That's a big problem for these people.
They were spending on that.
They want that back.
The media is a big part of that.
They all need their gravy train back, and Trump was really stopping them from their gravy train.
Yeah.
Well, if you look at it a certain way, Daniel, factoring the China stuff and everything into it, what you're really looking at is the ongoing dispute between what.
You know, I've called in the past finance capitalism and entrepreneurial capitalism, or in other words, you're looking at a dispute between people who make money by making money and people who make money by producing things,
whatever the thing may be you know, a symphony or corn, you know, it doesn't matter, but producers, people that produce things, and that's what this really is because you look at all the people lined up.
On, you know, let's use the American government as one gigantic grift.
Well, it's the financiers.
And they want to keep that gravy train rolling as they bankrupt everybody else and drive them into poverty.
And ultimately, we know the end result of that, they end up driving themselves into poverty.
Exactly.
Because, you know, it's what I can get today, not what we can do for the future.
So there's a fundamental spiritual crisis underneath all of this.
In that we have to start acting not just for ourselves and our immediate needs, we have to be thinking about our children and our grandchildren.
And no one's doing that other than perhaps President Trump.
And, you know, oddly enough, Trump is a, he's got one foot in the finance world and he's got one foot in the production world.
You know, he builds things, golf courses or whatever it may be, but he builds things, he produces things.
But in order to do that, he's had, you know, he's had to deal with these people.
So, yeah, I think you're right.
He revolutionized the, The situation with China because I think fundamentally he knew just kind of instinctually that we had to look out for our producers who are losing money and their livelihood and their jobs to China.
That was number one.
And number two, with Trump, we were dealing with something else up until FASB 56.
We were dealing with a man who knew the cost of capital.
And I'm citing and quoting Catherine Fitz here.
He knew the cost of capital.
Those nuts in Swampington, D.C., who've never held a job of any real sort, like I'm thinking Mitt Romney here.
Talk about finance capitalists.
These people in Washington don't know the cost of capital.
So it doesn't matter if Nasty Piglosi wants to spend a further $3 or $4 trillion on stimulus packages because, oh, we can just print it.
It's just nuts.
So that was the other problem with Trump right off the bat, because he knew the cost of capital and he knew the cost of investment and production, and these other people don't.
So you're dealing with two very, very different economic models right off the bat.
And he's a total outsider to the model in play in Washington and Wall Street.
So it's no wonder you see them ganging up on him.
Well, theirs is a virtual model, it doesn't have any real home in reality.
Right, exactly.
You know, they're dealing with markets run by computers.
Yes.
You know, tell me that that market reflects a human market, a human assessment of risk and investment and so on.
It doesn't at all.
Wow, incredible.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist show.
We're here with Dr. Joseph Farrell going deep, deep into all the deep state monkey business around election 2020, which is still unfolding.
Kuomintang Bonds and Fascists00:11:25
And I've put up the true map.
All over the internet, as far as I can take it.
Right now, the count goes 268 Trump, 253 Biden.
That's what we know on the ground.
And the switching totals that you see moving around have very much to do with the idea that they're not giving credit to Trump for the various states that he has, like Alaska and North Carolina, which, you know, are easy to call and project.
But that map's important in terms of the fact that we're in flux.
It's a fluid election situation, as it turns out.
Going back to Trump, this is what I wanted to ask you, Joseph.
There's maybe two unseen factors going on in the Trump presidency.
And this might also account for the fact that he didn't attack any other nations while in office.
One of them is this COG component, which suddenly they felt very comfortable this year in the media, Nancy Pelosi on the Democratic side talking about continuity of government and sort of using COVID as an excuse.
The continuity of government program has been there.
It's something that came up.
It's been used in these deep events around Contra.
9 11 was certainly used there by the people who had redeveloped it.
And we know continuity of government was originally set up as a doomsday network in case we got knocked out by nukes and you needed a separate government.
But then as time went by, that infrastructure grew and we're in a strange situation where they decided you know what?
We have continuity of government, even if it's not a nuclear situation.
In the 80s, they changed that.
We had people like Cheney and Rumsfeld who changed it in just any emergency.
So now we're in a situation where Trump may have faced off against them calling in COG sometime during that COVID crisis, either back in the spring or right there in October, when, as you said, it appeared that he was on a ship somewhere and not where they said that he was.
Now he, with all of these calls from Brennan and with the firing of Esper, He sees that possibly he sees that they are looking to use COG to drive him out.
That is to say, oh, there's no winner to the election, COG takes over.
Trump, they call the 25th Amendment on him, we're in charge.
This is a hidden factor going on in his presidency more than anybody else's on record.
I agree.
I think it came up in that Bush incident, as you said, somebody else was activating COG.
So there's a hidden factor.
And you've done a lot of deep research on extraterritorial and extra constitutional forces.
Besides just Democrats monkeying with that process, what else could be activating COG?
Oh, it could be non territorial actors of any sort.
If you look at the infrastructure, That the radical left has built in this country.
That infrastructure, if you look at all the elements of it, is definitely plugged into things like radical Islam.
It's definitely plugged into what to me looked like this blatant neo fascist movements, although they are disguising themselves as radical Marxists.
But it looks more to me like some sort of radical fascist agenda.
And of course, you know.
I'm unusual in, and I don't want people to misunderstand me.
I don't view fascism as a movement of the right.
I view it as a movement of the radical left, just like Marxism, because they're both essentially socialist in nature.
So don't make that confusion.
But I'm looking at it, and if they are plugged into all of these other things, then you can trace the dots and find connections between radical Islam and Nazis and radical Marxists.
Radical Islam and so on and so forth.
You know, the connections run a thousand different directions.
So I would not be surprised at all to find that there are these extraterritorial actors involved beyond just Mr. Global only, because that gravy train that you referred to earlier definitely involves the international criminal networks, you know, the mafia, basically, let's call it.
It definitely involves people involved in international human trafficking.
Organ harvesting, you know, the whole nine yards.
So again, you know, look at Trump.
He came out with that executive order, I think it was in 2017, against the international traffic and children and humans and so on and so forth.
So, in other words, he was taking direct aim once again at the gravy train, the part of the gravy train that is really the biggest, but it's the part we don't see.
So, there's no doubt in my mind that you're going to have international actors other than the big corporate foundations and central banks and so on.
You've got other actors involved in this because they're all involved with each other.
That's the problem.
Wow.
It's fascinating, too, that you've tracked a post World War II fascist element moving itself into different governments.
Oh, yeah.
South America and all the rest.
Right.
Pretty interesting candidate for a third force operating.
I mean, they're kind of interactive with, they may already be a part of, but they also can act independently.
Ask yourself this.
Let's go back to Hunter Biden's laptop.
Yeah.
And remember what I've said before about the post war Nazi international.
Where was one of its big headquarters?
Believe it or not, Taiwan.
Yes.
With the World Anti Communist Organization.
Now, if you want a front for CIA and Nazis, there it is.
Break up.
Which, by the way, happens to be headquartered in.
Taiwan.
Okay.
So Hunter Biden's laptop comes along.
We don't know where or how, but it's there.
And a bunch of Chinese calling themselves free Chinese.
And I got this, you know, shortly after the election, I get this article somebody sent me about this group of so called free Chinese that, you know, hate the Chinese communist government, want to see it overthrown, blah, blah, blah.
And they're over here and they've started a website where they Put out Hunter Biden's laptop with links that you can click on and go look at what's on the laptop.
Yeah, right.
And so I'm reading this, and yeah, I clicked the link and I had to shut it off after about 30 seconds because it was pretty disgusting.
But anyway, I'm thinking, wait a minute here.
How did the free Chinese get a hold of what's clearly Hunter Biden?
Several compromising positions.
And I'm not exaggerating when I say that.
And how did they get a hold of it when we can't get it out of Fox or CNN or CBS?
And I'm spelling that S E E B S news.
How did they get it?
Wow.
What's that little chain all about?
And no one out there, everybody's saying, oh, look at the Chinese are publishing Hunter Biden's laptop.
And I'm saying, wait a minute, guys.
There's a question to be asked here.
How did they get it?
And there's not a word anywhere about it.
So I'm suspecting, yeah, little networks of some really shady people have passed things along for whatever reason.
Yeah, it's just kooky.
And if there's free Chinese involved, I'm smelling Taipei.
Yeah.
Chiang Kai shek put together the nationalist Chinese and he didn't roll over and play dead stuck on his island.
So, you know, again, something's up.
There's a few words.
Yeah, it's like a force that does not enter into normal parlance.
Well, there's another little aspect of this gravy train.
Since we're talking about the weird surrounding all of this, this year, I think it was about six or seven months ago, there was a story that came out, and I don't remember if I blogged on it or not, but you can go look it up, folks.
There was a story that came out.
About all of those nationalist Chinese bonds.
Yes.
That people still have and are trying to get communist China to redeem.
And they were talking to the Trump administration about it.
Now, I don't care what happened in the talks, it's just the fact that they got far enough up the chain of command to have a talk.
With anybody in the Trump administration about bonds from the 1930s from the Kuomintang government of China.
You know, something's going on there too, because that's a lot of money, you know, that people have held on to these bonds all this time.
And Taiwan, of course, well, we can't be responsible for them.
We're just kind of a small little government in exile here on our island, building big towers, you know, for big banks.
But, you know, and China, the communist Chinese have said just very bluntly, no, we're not going to honor those.
But the problem is the Chinese have honored other bonds from the Kuomintang government.
So, you know, it's just bizarre.
So, yeah, there's a lot going on with the gravy train that doesn't even get factored into any of these big national discussions.
But, you know, these stories are there.
And China's sitting in the middle of it and forces that branch out of China, even Falun Gong.
Which is held up in exile, their leader exiled here in the Epoch Times and all that, they came on Trump's side very heavily.
Wuhan Lab Financial Ties00:07:03
Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah.
Newspaper, forget it.
I mean, if you're the gravy train and you're looking at communist China, just remember that story from about three or four months ago where it was exposed that several billions of dollars of loans had been floated internally in China based on bullion.
That turned out to be fake.
Wow.
Tungsten filled, gold wrapped bars.
Billions.
Yeah.
So, again, there could be a lot coming out in the wash in that D class if Don Jr. gets his way.
Right.
Because.
He's floating it out there.
Yeah, he's certainly floating it out there.
And, you know, this is like Mad Madden Merkel.
If you look at Trump and the way he floats trial balloons, well, use my kids.
You know, Mad Madam Merkel does the same thing.
Well, I'll have this cabinet minister leak something, you know, and let's see what that does.
Wow, incredible.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
We are going into the deep state monkey business of the 2020 election with Dr. Joseph Farrell.
I want to mention that Dr. Farrell's books and all of his work is available at gizadebstar.com, including the incredible blogs that you've done around nanotechnology and all the things that are going on.
You did mention very early on when we got the strange word about COVID and all that at the beginning of the year, this very interesting story about Professor Lieber from Harvard.
Harvard, come on.
You live there, come on, it's Harvard.
It's Ovid, yes.
It's Ovid.
Yeah.
You dropped a SWAT team on him about.
Yeah, I can see that.
You're strolling across Harvard, Ovid Yard, minding your own business, and these ropes come down from helicopters in the sky that are making no noise.
Off we go.
Since we're talking about the Chinese.
Yeah.
My question for you is, Lieber.
Mm hmm.
The timing with the Wuhan virus.
Look, this whole thing is also fishy to me because if you investigate Lieber, allegedly he was arrested for not disclosing the financial ties that he had to the very laboratory in Wuhan that was studying COVID viruses.
Now, Lieber's specialty was nanotechnology, nanochemistry.
How to insert things into your body that will respond to signals or programs already preset in them and do things.
So I was speculating at the time okay, at that time, Daniel, the behavior of this virus, whatever it is, was so bizarre and so unusual that it didn't make any sense.
I don't claim to have any sort of medical expertise.
I get a cut and it's a band aid.
That's my medicine.
I can't afford a doctor.
But it didn't make any medical sense.
And then it really began to make no medical sense when we were all told that we had to socially distance, unless you were protesting.
That's okay.
But if you're going to a casino or a church, that's not okay.
But, well, wait a minute.
We better change our thinking about casinos.
You know, it just made no sense.
So I started thinking what if this is some sort of Bioelectrically engineered virus that you can turn on and off in certain regions, you know, through signals.
That's a dumb idea, I know, but the behavior of this thing makes no sense to me.
I mean, I just saw before the show today that on my home page on my browser, an article of a study of why families react to COVID differently.
And I had a picture of this family, four members of the family, mother, father, and two kids.
That had all responded to COVID completely differently, even though they're genetically related.
So, you know, okay, what's up with that?
So, you know, and then, you know, the strange story out of France that smokers are 19% less likely to develop any severe COVID thing.
So, you know, I'm here smoking away having my anti COVID moment, but Lieber made no sense other than.
Why is a guy involved in nanotechnology involved in viruses?
And a guy not only involved in nanotechnology, but cooperating in these plans to inject nanotechnology as tracking devices into viruses.
Right.
So that comes out.
Then, shortly after that, Dr. Fausti is revealed to have been involved directly in shunting money again to the Wuhan laboratory where all of this began because President Obama shut down his research.
Right.
So.
Go, Barack, you know.
Good call there.
But all of a sudden, don't do it on my watch.
Yeah, don't do it on my watch.
Yeah, so, you know, the whole story there began to make no sense.
And then you saw Trump trying, you know, gradually, after these stories came out, you saw Trump gradually starting to pull away from Fauci.
So I don't know what's going on here, other than it looks to me like somebody.
Who was privy to this whole thing was trying to shut down the operation in midstream.
That's what it looks like to me.
Because these stories certainly were going to break on their own.
So, again, I'm thinking we've got some player involved here who's not going along with the narrative and making sure that certain people or internet outlets and so on are getting this information out there.
And now it's a gale.
Now it's a gale.
I mean, my local rhino mayor, oh, you wouldn't believe this guy.
But anyway, he's now being sued by some doctors where I live for following only one version of the science and not paying attention to any of the counter indicating narratives.
So, you know, this is a mess.
Wow.
Social Engineering Experiments00:08:19
And I expect more lawsuits.
I mean, the German doctors are hopping mad.
They are.
They're hopping mad, you know.
We've been here before, but you know, you've got that German American lawyer out in California starting all these COVID lawsuits.
You've got Robert Kennedy Jr. in the background here.
It's not going to be long before he gets involved with it.
So, this whole thing, and I'm sorry, since we're speculating here, Daniel, all of a sudden, magically, Pfizer comes out with a virus that's 90% effective.
A vaccine.
Yeah, or pardon me, with a vaccine.
Now, I'm sorry, a vaccine takes a long time to get to be where it's quote unquote safe.
Granting the fact that the Food and Drug Administration gave us Monster Santo and GMOs, the timing doesn't seem right to me.
In other words, what I'm suggesting is they were working on a vaccine a long time before they said that they started working on them.
Right.
That's what bothers me here.
So, again, big op, big op.
And quite frankly, given some of the other vaccine trials on this COVID thing that we've been hearing about, you know, causing myelitis and other stuff, I don't care what Pfizer says about its safety.
I have questions about.
I mean, if they did rush it through that fast, I want to know what effects it's going to have on the people that took it as part of the trials on their children or their grandchildren.
You can't tell me that there's been any intergenerational studies done on this thing unless they started early.
Yeah.
Wow.
Yeah.
Well, obviously, they have the ability to alter your DNA using measles.
And we know that this is a very serious push that they've had.
They had the push going on, they were using measles.
Yeah.
And they were like, measles this and measles that.
And people generally were like, well, you know, measles is pretty minor.
Thing.
And you're not going to get everyone on board to have this mandatory injection.
So he did something else.
They've created this whole thing and they've made it worldwide.
And they originally, especially with Gates, were like, you know, oh, we'll never be the same again.
You'll never shake hands.
And, you know, you'll have Thanksgiving in a test tube bubble and all that.
So that's the kind of weird, sick way that he was thinking and rolling this out.
He got tremendous pushback.
I think that they rolled him out.
And in that billionaire bubble, he was thinking, I'll be greeted as a hero and all this stuff.
And these people are in such an insulated bubble that when he got out there in the real world and people already knew that he was this kind of software deviant from back in the tech days, I mean, I used to run a tech magazine.
I know a lot about Bill Gates.
There's no St. Gates there.
He's not a doctor, he's a college dropout.
And so he knows about as much about medicine as a local cab driver.
I mean, he doesn't know anything about it.
So he's a product of this other thing.
And when you see that kind of pushback that took place with him, you can see that their effort, they constantly have to redo the prototype of this effort.
And this latest version is we have this president elect that we invented.
He's a big unity guy.
And his first thing, he creates a COVID task force and he has a new vaccine.
Well, you know.
His response to all of this is just so predictable.
Daniel, I was literally waiting the last week or so since the election to hear the Democrats come out and start talking about healing.
I was just waiting for the healing word magically to appear.
We've got to unite.
We've got to heal.
We've got to have a conversation.
We've got to have a discussion.
We've got to have a dial.
All this claptrap that they toss out and talk about, whatever they want to.
Pretend like they're having a real exchange of ideas, and we win anyway.
It's so nuts.
But the COVID thing and Bill Gates from the start, especially with the mask mandates and all of that claptrap, can't have Thanksgiving, can't have Christmas, can't sing in your mosque, can't go to the temple in the synagogue and pray and do any of this stuff other than socially distanced, of course.
That is social engineering.
And the sole goal is to get people compliant.
That's the sole goal.
You know, wearing a mask to try and stop a virus is like putting up a chain link fence to stop a sandstorm.
Absolutely.
It's just not there.
You know, and you end up with a mask that's like Linus's blanket.
It's just, you know, it's just cruddy.
You know, it's just bad.
You know, it's just, it's they've gone so far here in Massachusetts that their new rule is you need one anywhere if you're outside.
So, even if you're on a mountaintop alone, you need one.
So, that's the kind of insanity that they've rolled over with that.
And, like you said, many doctors have gone on the record with tests on that.
It doesn't do anything.
New England Journal of Medicine called it a talisman.
Well, yeah, exactly.
Well, you know, I said the silly math take off the silly math.
The Lancet published an article years ago, I think, about are there any benefits to wearing masks in the operating room?
Wow.
And they came up and said, well, not really.
It just makes everybody feel better.
So, okay.
It's so absurd.
It's so absurd.
So, yeah, this whole COVID thing is a social engineering experiment to make people compliant.
I literally saw an article where some priest somewhere was baptizing an infant.
Using a squirt gun from six feet away, holding this little baby who's wondering, what the dickens is going on here?
Why is this guy shooting water in my face?
I did only therapy for many, many years.
It's just bonkers.
It's just bonkers.
Wow.
You know, that's like a rabbi trying to do a circumcision socially distanced.
You know, I mean, come on.
It's just, it ain't going to work, folks.
Well, you know, it's amazing because they used the whole situation to, they really used it against Trump.
Yeah, of course.
Yeah.
This is really their linchpin, in a sense.
Yeah.
Because it also created the ability for these weird, bizarre mail in ballots to come in early and come in late.
Yep.
You got them on both sides.
And notice how many people counting those ballots are not wearing rubber gloves.
Yes.
They've got their little chain link fence on.
But where's the concern about transmission from skin?
You know, come on, folks.
Tesla and Nuclear Secrets00:12:15
I thought you were going to say nosebag.
I've been waiting for it.
Well, the nosebag, yes.
The horse feeder bag, you know.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Program.
We're here with Dr. Joseph Farrell, Deep State Monkey Business.
We're deep in it now.
Yeah, we are.
You keep saying monkey business, Daniel.
I'm thinking back to that game that I had when I was a kid of all these little plastic monkeys.
Oh, yeah.
You remember that?
The barrel of monkeys, I think it was called.
I know there's an Elvis song, Monkey Business.
But, you know, it's interesting because really the piece that's hanging out there is the get Trump.
Mm hmm.
And then you wonder why the get is absent.
It's like if we don't get Trump, we'll die.
This is pretty much their attitude.
So, why is it that they need to get Trump no matter what?
It's not just we need to get him out, we need to get in, we want our power back.
It's like if he is not gone, we'll disintegrate like the Wicked Witch in the Wizard of Oz.
Oh, a consummation devoutly to be wished.
But.
But no, I don't think it's as much about getting Trump as getting what he represents.
What he represents is nationalism, a healthy middle class, an end to finance capital privilege, an end to international trade deals that only benefit the very wealthy and not the people producing things, and on and on we could go.
I think that's what has them scared.
Because if he is successful in draining that swamp city state called Washington, D.C., Then it's going to ripple across the world.
And we've seen it already ripple in Europe in a major way and for slightly different reasons, but ultimately they come down to the same thing.
People do not like this global capitalism thing that they have been trying to put into place because it's only benefiting them and no one else.
So that's why they hate Trump.
I mean, there's the visceral hate of Trump from the low information voter.
Who doesn't like him because he has an R behind his name and a bad hairdo.
But beyond that, I think he's, to a certain extent, Daniel, I think part of it is they view him as a traitor to their class.
Yes.
This is it.
That's it.
They view him as a traitor to their class.
It's fine if you're a rich billionaire with golf courses and casinos.
Just so long as you play our game.
It's not fine if you don't want to play our game.
Right.
Because all those other people, I mean, just think of them the Rockefellers, the rotten childs.
They are filthy.
They achieved their riches through fraud, skullduggery, and in Rockefeller's case, just outright thuggery.
Oh, yeah.
You know, just outright thuggery.
And we have to stop.
Making these people our heroes.
The success of a person should not be measured by how much wealth they accumulated and how many skulls they cracked.
Right.
You know, that's written into the American culture, and it's high time we start challenging it.
That's not a measure of a successful person, in my view.
It's a measure of a thug, and that's what these people are.
So, you know, Trump comes along, and who knows, he may achieve some of his riches through thuggery.
But then at a certain point, he sees what's happening and says, No, we can't keep doing this.
Even thugs can be rational.
Yeah.
You know, so I view him in a certain sense as kind of a traitor to their class.
Yeah, that's it.
That is such a great realization and it resonates.
I mean, I guess the other thing that stands out from the Trump administration as an oddity is the Space Force.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah.
What does it say to us that?
He launched the Space Force, and however you want to view his connections, the connection with his uncle in advanced technology means he has an avenue in that the others did not.
Right.
Right.
Well, I definitely think he did that because of some sort of inside information.
I don't think that was just a lark to make some headlines.
Uh uh.
Uh uh.
So, how does that play into the get Trump, get what he represents?
Because, again, if you are.
I go back to he's a traitor to his class.
Well, that entire class is talking about space, and they have been for decades.
They've been pushing this meme of mining asteroids, mining the moon, and blah, blah, blah, because they know how much is out there.
You know, I go back to what I said in the 2014 Secret Space Conference.
They collateralized space early on.
That's how they intend to write off all that bad paper that they've piled up.
So they've got to go out there and they've got to have control of it.
We can't have this guy messing up that game.
Right.
Why?
Well, if he's a traitor to his class and wants everybody to get a fair shake, especially the middle class, what does that tell you about what he might be thinking about space?
He might be thinking the same thing.
He may or may not be, but they can't take that chance that he is.
Right.
Unbelievable.
It makes so much sense.
And when I was looking and finding the connections with John Trump, You know, his connection with Tesla and his deeper connections with Vannevar Bush, who we know is in charge of that alternative technology, the UFO file.
He's got very unusual signatures for a president on the technology side.
Oh, absolutely, he does.
More, I would say, than any other president, including Reagan, who certainly had a handle on it.
And I would say more than Kennedy.
Because those connections in Trump's case are direct and personal.
And again, let's not forget Roy Cohn here, because Cohn was up to his earlobes in that business, you know, the Monmouth investigations of Senator McCarthy's committee, which, you know, are pretty astonishing.
But, you know, he's got a personal insight into these things that no other president. We've ever elected, has had.
You know, Kennedy had access, but he had to push for it and was only able to gain so much.
Reagan had access to it, but again, was only able to go so far.
And he did not have nor cultivate in his political career or any other career that he had, he never cultivated those kinds of contacts.
Trump had them handed to him on a silver platter.
Yeah.
You know, with his uncle, with Roy Cohn, with Vannevar Bush.
This is a very, very unusual president in that respect.
And if you get right down to it, you look at other world leaders, you know, that were alive during his life Charles de Gaulle, Conrad Adenauer, Harold Macmillan, you know, all these people.
I would venture to say that not even they, as connected as they were, had near the information on a personal basis that he does.
Incredible.
And it plays a major role, especially.
I mean, there's the UFO file side of the Space Force.
Sure.
That's his background.
Sure.
There's also the Tesla aspect.
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
He knows all of that.
He's got the X technology, in a sense, and then he's got the UFO file.
He's kind of a triple threat.
Yeah.
It could easily be.
And if you're, again, if you're Mr. Global only and regard him as a traitor to his class and look at all of those connections that he has, you have to be wondering what he knows that we don't know.
You know, the only other world leader I can think of, Daniel, that would have anywhere near the kind of technological insight that he may have would be Yuri Andropov.
Wow.
What does that tell you?
That's funny.
I mentioned him at the beginning of the podcast.
You mentioned Andropov at the beginning, yeah.
Look, you brought something very important forward about Andropov, and he shows up in the Soviet Union running things before Gorbachev.
He's only in there for a little short period of time before he dies.
But he does something extraordinary, which is he puts out this mandate to his military to report on a UFO file.
Yes.
Now, the entire Soviet military.
That was not done back then.
No.
No.
And as a former director of the KGB, he's got the muscle to enforce it.
Right.
He's an extraordinary, powerful man and absolutely without any scruple.
Right.
And there's no doubt in my mind that he, of all the world leaders at that time, probably, in my opinion, was probably the best informed on things like UFOs or alternative technologies.
And let's not forget who's his protege?
Mikhail Gorbachev.
Yes.
Yeah.
Gorby himself.
And Gorby was with Reagan.
Yep.
And, uh, Of course, we'll help you if you're invaded by extraterrestrials.
And Gorbachev made that public.
And he made it very public.
Yes, he did.
Yes, he did.
And then they said, you know what?
We're going to get together at Reykjavik and have a zero option.
All the nuclear weapons are going to be gone.
All of them.
Zero.
You can't do that.
You can't do that unless you got something better in the wings.
And they both know they do.
And that's 1987.
And that's 1987.
Yeah.
What does that tell you?
Oh, you got nuclear weapons?
Well, nice, you know.
Yeah, you know.
And don't forget all that Soviet research on strange little bugs that eat up radioactivity and make it harmless.
Oh, yeah.
You mentioned something.
And I always find this fascinating.
And if you look back on this bookshelf here, it's mostly Joseph Farrell's books.
I will say this there's something in there that's fascinating about Medvedev.
Oh boy.
Medvedev and Soviet Research00:03:21
Yeah.
Good old Dimitri.
I keep running into these people named Dimitri.
Medvedev has something very interesting to his credit.
Well, I mean, he's the stand in president.
It's a weird interim thing for Couldn't Rain.
But he also said something very unusual about a kind of technology that could steer asteroids.
I just put out an interesting story on Twitter about this fireball that went across the northeast of America and went over Boston, even.
And people said, you know, it really looked like a missile.
But we've been seeing these fireballs.
It's like the year 2020 is the year of the fireball.
It's incredible.
And here you have this story back there about Medvedev letting out this kind of odd thing about hey, we can direct asteroids.
Uh huh.
Uh huh.
Let me take a break here because this is important.
I don't want to interrupt this.
This is important.
Let me take a break.
Absolutely.
We'll be waiting.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
Wow.
Incredible.
Dr. Joseph Farrell going deep into the deep state monkey business, the 2020 election, and what's to come in 2021 with the reset regime trying to take over here.
But the election not called, and a whole different map available, which I've put out there, which are called the True Map.
I do hashtag True Map on Twitter, showing that Trump has 268 electoral votes and that Biden actually has 253 as things stand.
And I've gone into various explanations in other programs.
But the idea is that we're looking at a situation that is fluid on the election side, but the media has gone big brother and tried to tell you who's the president.
And he's the president elect, and you have to admit it.
Even though there's all this counting, I mean, Nevada, which they called, was neck and neck, and they allowed ballots up until 5 p.m. today.
So, how could they have called it on Saturday?
It doesn't make any sense.
And I can tell you the things that they're doing from a journalistic point of view, from media organizations, who I've had something to do with my whole life, you don't do things this way for a lot of reasons.
And the fact that they're willing to do it shows this weird kamikaze thing.
And it's funny because Megyn Kelly, of all people, who was once inside that Fox machine, Uh, she came out and did an interview where she said, You know, this really mystifies me the way that they're doing this election.
This is not anything like the way we used to run things in the newsroom, and she was right.
She said it must be that just the get Trump thing, and you know, she was echoing it.
It was almost like we're watching the Dark Journalist show, so there we are.
Dr. Farrell is back.
Yes, I'm back.
Thank you.
Um, talking about Megyn Kelly, oh dear.
Well, no, she came out and she made a statement.
Well, that name makes me wince.
Missiles and Asteroid Threats00:06:17
What did she come out and do now?
She said she could not believe the way that they were running this election in the media and at Fox.
It was nothing like her time there, which I thought was pretty interesting coming from her.
Coming from her, yeah.
Well, you know, I'm waiting for Greta Van Sestren to weigh in.
Yes.
Because, you know, her father was connected to McCarthy.
Oh, right.
He was.
Absolutely.
He was.
Yeah.
Wow.
Okay.
So we're back.
We're on Medvedev.
Medvedev.
I'm sorry.
Dmitry Medvedev.
Okay.
And steering asteroids.
Yeah.
Well, do you remember?
There were two strange incidents.
Do you remember the incident where the American and Soviet, or pardon me, American and Russian satellite a few years ago collided?
Yes.
Now, folks, that doesn't happen.
No.
No.
Because neither satellite, as far as I'm aware, I may be wrong.
But as far as I'm aware, they had the capability to maneuver in orbit.
They were just put up there, and there they were.
So for them to collide means that somebody pushed them together because they were not in orbits where they would collide.
I mean, we wouldn't do that.
The Russians wouldn't do that.
And as far as I know, the Russian satellite was not one of these things that was an anti satellite satellite.
So it was just a satellite.
So we had that incident.
So somebody's got a capability they're not talking about.
Then there was the Chelyabinsk meteor incident.
And a month before that happened, Dmitry Medvedev went on Russian television talking about the need to erect an asteroid defense system.
And, you know, we've got to get international cooperation going on this.
And if we can't, then we're just going to have to build out our own.
And the news commentator asked him, well, you know, how are you going to.
Take out asteroids.
Oh, he says.
I remember this.
And he was just deadpan about it.
He says, Oh, you know, we have our missiles.
We can use our ICBMs and shoot them.
And, you know, we have other ways to do it.
Other, other, other ways to do it.
And I'm thinking, Oh, yes, Dimitri, do you care to share what those are?
The commentator didn't ask the follow up question being part of tasks and all.
So that just hovers out there ever since then.
We have other ways of taking care of asteroids, whatever they may be.
So I don't doubt that they've got something that they haven't told us about.
And Gorbachev and Reagan getting together and having their zero option thing, that was a.
Huge moment, folks, because that was an admission that they're no longer reliant on thermonuclear missiles as a strategic deterrent.
I mean, they still got them.
You know, they're nice to have if you want to blow things up, but there are other ways of getting things accomplished that you don't need that anymore.
Rods of God, for example.
So Trump comes along with his Space Force, and you've just got to be thinking that this was hovering in the background.
When the Tianjin chemical plant exploded, I'm sorry, that crater looks to me to be way too deep for a chemical plant explosion.
Yeah, yeah.
And then you had some U.S. general being asked by a reporter who made sure to ask it very loudly.
Remember this one?
Are all the options on the table?
General says, Yes, all the options are on the table.
Does that include kinetic weapons?
And he says, Yes.
Amazing.
Amazing.
Right there.
Okay.
You've got to have a platform to launch those kinetic weapons.
And it ain't aircraft carriers.
Right.
Unbelievable.
When you see this kind of activity, it's weird because the Space Force makes a lot more sense.
Oh, yeah.
You realize the world that they're actually in versus how things are presented to us.
Right.
And again, if you're Mr. Global only and have.
Control of that technology through, you know, several corporations and cutouts and so on and so forth.
Do you want a traitor to the class coming along and talking nationalism and establishing a new military command?
Brent.
No, you don't.
You don't.
Because you've already collateralized what's out there.
Yes, absolutely.
It brings me back to Werner von Braun and some of the things that he said were coming.
And, uh, Speaking to his aide there, this does resonate.
And I have to say, it's not just one of these kind of alternative stories that's, you know, it's nice to have it out there in the lore or whatever.
It seems to me very specific how things have gone that he predicted that there were various threats that would be created.
But one of them, interestingly enough, was an asteroid threat.
Yeah, you're talking about the Rosen affidavit.
Yes.
Yeah, he told this to Dr. Carol Rosen.
And there was a sequence that he outlined of how they were going to weaponize space, the narratives that they were going to use to do so.
The first was going to be well, we need to have missile defense against the communists.
Well, okay, they're still around and they've still got missiles.
And then it was going to be nations of concern.
Right.
Then terrorists, then asteroids, and the final one was ET.
Yes.
Right.
Space Program Cable Cuts00:07:25
And it seems like they did a lot of things during this COVID lockdown period.
They rolled out a lot of stories about asteroids and the UFO file.
They sure did.
And.
Voila, the cables just happened to snap at Arecibo.
Yes.
Can't have that thing looking around too closely.
Arecibo, this was very interesting because I had someone get in touch with me who was there when this took place, and they said, all these fire engines went up there.
And I thought, that's interesting.
That sounds more like sabotage than an old cable snapping.
Well, I'm putting out the story now that a second cable has snapped.
Oh.
So that sounds to me like doctoring the narrative.
Because, Daniel, when I blogged about this and showed pictures of the cables at Arecibo that supposedly had snapped.
Yes.
And I compared them to the cables of Galloping Gertie.
Remember her?
Yeah.
The suspension bridge that went down at the Tacoma Narrows in the 40s.
Yes.
Well, you can go online and see pictures of the cables that had snapped.
On Galloping Gertie.
This looks like spaghetti.
Wow.
And he got a little spaghetti with the Arecibo thing, but most of those brakes look clean.
Yes.
That's the problem.
We have things about Arecibo also, which is that when they talked to the original guy who was giving commentary on it, he said, What's odd about it is we had fixed all these new cables from last year.
Yeah.
Not like aging, you know.
And the thing about Arecibo that everyone needs to know is it's part of this program for kind of watching the skies for.
Intelligent behavior, that kind of thing.
Yeah, it's part of SETI.
Right.
Yeah.
And those cables, as far as I know, were galvanized to begin with.
So it's not as if you're going to have corrosion or things like that happening on it.
So, you know, it looked to me at the time, still does, like there was some sort of mechanism that was used to cut the cables.
You know, nanothermite, who knows?
Lasers, you know, who knows?
I don't know.
What do you, why would they sabotage it?
To keep it from looking, because that effectively means that that part of the sky is dark as far as any really large radio telescope array is concerned.
You've got the very large array out in the southwestern United States, but that's a different thing.
The only other one that is similarly sized to Arecibo is guess what?
It's in China.
Wow.
Incredible.
You know, I wanted to mention this to you since we're talking about Von Braun, which is I had a series of interviews with.
The founder of the remote viewing program, Russell Targ.
And he told me that the way he got his ESP research training grant to build this ESP testing machine is that he built one and Vernon von Braun used it.
He was so good that he was like, You have to get this out to all the NASA people to try this out, so we're going to get the funding for you.
And he was the one who set it up.
Oh, really?
I found out further that Russell told me that von Braun, who was a very interesting guy when they met, they talked.
Yeah.
Aside from being a Nazi.
Aside from that.
But his mother was known as like a renowned psychic.
And had the ability to predict the future and all these types of things, which I had never heard before.
But it's interesting when we look at Von Braun, we get this multi dimensional character.
So, him making these predictions, in a sense, being so interested in the psychic phenomena, I thought.
His warnings came back and echoed in my ears when I was talking to Targ.
Well, I didn't know that Von Braun had sponsored an ESP machine for NASA, but it makes sense, and I'll tell you why.
Because during the Soviet space program, when they were doing all of that very classified research into paranormal and things like that in the Soviet Union, they were conducting ESP experiments with their cosmonauts.
Oh, yeah.
They were doing all sorts of very, very strange stuff.
I mean, the list keeps getting stranger because they've sent icons up to the International Space Station and so on, and relics up there.
So, you know, Richard Hoagland talks about the magicians and masons in NASA.
Well, the Soviets are doing the same sort of thing.
So it's very, very, and continue to do it even under the Russian Federation.
So it's very, very interesting what's going on up there.
Interesting.
Oh, and we know so little really about the Russian space program.
I mean, we go round and round on NASA and everything else, but the Soviet part that they developed and then the Russian follow up, which was really advanced, obviously, we don't know it oh so well in terms of research at all.
No, we don't.
We don't.
And we're still, you know, if you look at where space is right now, right now, the Chinese space program would be nowhere.
Without the Soviet space program.
Because basically, the Chinese stuff is all reworked Russian technology, you know, tweaked, so to speak.
Same thing right now with the International Space Station.
The only reason anyone's getting up there is because the Russians have the only manned spaceflight capability other than the Chinese to put people up there.
Wow.
You know, so I don't know what's going on in the West, but it does give me pause, you know.
The Trump administration wants to have us back on the moon by 2024.
And I'm thinking, where's the effort?
You know, we were clued in by the media, as you remember during this.
You may remember, I don't know, I remember it because I grew up during it.
I studied it.
Well, you know, it was almost a weekly report on Cronkite.
Yeah.
You know, the Mercury missions, the Gemini.
You know, I was watching these as a kid, and, you know, they were updating constantly on the major media.
And you don't see that today at all.
And it's not as if there's nothing going on.
It's just, you know, so what?
Well, they're working in the back.
The only thing we actually hear about is a UFO threat.
You know, that they roll that out once in a while.
It's about it.
Yeah, and that narrative is interesting because if you look at the military and intelligence community involvement with the UFO subject, the narrative has changed from one of reconnaissance and space brothers to threat.
Classified UFO Transcripts00:03:41
Now, all along, I've been saying, yeah, there's more of a threat than people want to admit.
Sure.
But now, for some reason, they're ginning this up.
They love the threat.
Yeah, they love the threat.
You know, we got to put weapons up there, folks.
I mean, that's what it's all about.
So, and it's really all about collateralizing all those assets out there and making sure we and not they, whoever they are, can control them.
Probably one of the they being Donald Trump.
But it's interesting because we started with John Brennan and the comments he made, the 25th Amendment trying to get Trump out.
What's interesting and what People don't usually connect to Brennan, is that he tried to push on record saying, Oh, we need to investigate this strange UFO phenomena.
It might be a threat.
So Brennan had the UFO lingo of like the TSA type groups in Elizondo, and Elizondo actually worked for him.
Yeah.
So, you know, that's a very interesting overlay considering what we know about Brennan's very strange past anyway.
Very early on, he was connected with the Communist Party.
Uh huh.
Uh huh.
You pointed that out to me.
Yeah, he was.
Yeah, he had voted and admits that he had voted.
Diana West talks about it in her book called The Red Thread.
And she's got another one out now called America Betrayed, which is a real deep dive into the communist influence.
But, you know, that and then him calling for the 25th Amendment and then Trump and Roy Cohn.
Now, you tell me that Brennan, with his.
Kami leanings wouldn't know about the significance of that relationship.
Yes.
And, you know, I have to wonder did you sit down and read the Monmouth transcripts too?
Sure.
We should clue everyone in there that you have these two amazing books on McCarthy and on the Monmouth hearings and how a lot of those transcripts had recently come out.
Some of them had been locked up for 50 years.
They had been locked up from.
1952 until 2003, when the Senate Government Operations Committee, which was the committee that McCarthy ran at the time, at the time that they were declassified, Senator Lieberman was the chairman of that committee.
And it was his committee that declassified those transcripts finally, giving us the reason that everybody's dead now, and so we can go ahead because it's not going to hurt anybody anymore.
Which you read the transcripts, that wasn't at all the reason that they were kept classified.
That kept classified for so long.
I mean, it's just unreal.
And, you know, you can see some famous names that signed off on the declassification Chuck Schumer, Senator Lieberman, you know, lots of people that would be recognizable names.
But it's what's in the transcripts because there are clear, I mean, there's just no two ways of stating it.
There are clear references to the UFO, there are clear but coded references to Roswell, there's an absolutely explicit reference to Project Blue Book.
And you know, it's Senator McCarthy asking, asking all the questions.
No, no, that's about the last connection you would think of with Joe McCarthy and UFOs.
Republican Party Pushback00:08:37
It's amazing.
It's absolutely amazing.
I have to tell you, I have to give you a hint.
I'm researching another book.
And I found another really, really odd, really, really, really, really odd monument thing.
Oh.
Any hints here?
I can't.
I can't.
People are going to have to read it and see it.
Well, they're going to see the X's on your sweater and they're going to know.
Here we go, folks.
I'm part of the cabal.
You were deep into it when you show up with X's on your sweater.
I didn't even think about that.
That's too good.
I wanted to wrap up on a couple of things.
And everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
We're here with Dr. Joseph Farrell.
I want to recommend you go to gizadestar.com and check out all of the incredible work that he has there and inform so many of the themes that we discuss on the show.
And of course, Joseph's been a guest on the program since the very beginning.
But one of the things I also want to mention in relation to the work that you're doing is it seems like so much of it is playing out now.
For example, if we look at your Covert Wars book, that Aspect seems to be playing out so much more in public now that we can see it.
That it's almost like your books, which were ahead of their time in terms of the research, almost make more sense now because these things come out of the theoretical and move into the physical reality that we can see.
How do you feel about that?
Well, I think definitely that the Covert Wars books, at least insofar as I discuss hidden systems of finance.
And gigantic amounts of money, that to my mind has been more or less vindicated, particularly with the FASB 56 regulations.
It's like Catherine Fitz points out with respect to those things.
They've taken the entire federal government budget effectively black.
Yes.
So it's as if the hidden system has just swamped and overwhelmed everything.
And I think that's part of.
The campaign against Trump.
Even though these regulations were promulgated under his administration, I don't think for a moment that the order came down from him because I don't think he has enough control of the federal bureaucracy to do that.
I think they were in the works already.
So I think part of the campaign is to keep him from having any influence or insight into that financial structure.
So, I do think that aspect of things has been vindicated.
I think that certain of the technologies that I discuss in those books are looking more and more believable.
We've seen some pretty incredible things being revealed now by the government in their effort to get people thinking of UFOs as a threat.
Although they're still not telling us what they have, and they still haven't convincingly.
Made the case to me that they're not playing around with themselves up there in their little UFO videos and creating a false flag narrative.
So I think.
I want to say something about Targ there, which is when he mentioned the Tic Tac video, he said it wasn't convincing at all.
Right.
Just support what you just said.
Yeah.
Go ahead.
Yeah.
Well, I think, in a certain sense, those aspects of things have been vindicated.
We'll see about all the rest.
You know, time will tell.
Time will tell.
But it's important to remember I wrote those books, like all the books, they're argued speculation, is what they are.
Right.
Absolutely.
Incredible.
When you look into 2021, everything you see playing out, what's the kind of scenario that you see coming on?
A mess.
Worse than 2020.
Lots of bumps along the way.
It will be less bumpy.
If Trump wins, it will be incredible.
If Biden wins, there will be a.
Pretend return to normalcy.
Okay.
But behind it, there will be very, very draconian measures and policies because they will try to undo as much of what this current administration has accomplished that they can.
There's no doubt in my mind.
The other thing I see happening is.
I think the Republican Party is going to try to convince itself that they've returned to normal.
And if they do that, they have misread the situation entirely.
That Trump vote will not go away now.
Third party is not.
Yeah.
I don't know if there will be a third party or what.
But I just don't see that element of the culture going quietly into the night.
I really don't.
And if they think it is, and if they try and make it go quietly into the night by force, that'll make it even worse.
And the same thing in Europe.
I don't see the protests in Europe diminishing because the people in Brussels keep trying to put into place the same policies that the people are protesting, and it ain't going to work.
So I think that may happen.
I'd watch China very carefully.
Because I don't think Mr. Xi's position is as secure as the Chinese Communist Party is trying to make it look.
I think there's some deep factional problems going on there with him.
One thing that will not change with either administration is this new alignment with India.
That will not change, that's going to stay there.
I think.
I think you're going to see the other major powers beefing up their defenses because the United States is so uncertain.
Japan has already started, we know that.
And it will continue under this new Japanese prime minister.
And they'll mouth all the platitudes about helping the United States and being responsible and securing the Pacific Basin, collective security, and all that.
But they're going to rearm because precisely the United States is no longer a trustworthy ally.
That's what's coming out of all of this.
If you're the other major powers in the West that have been aligned with the United States, the long term situation that they see is we're no longer trustworthy.
We're no longer stable.
If there's this much corruption, this is not a stable government.
And you cannot afford, if you're a Germany or a France or a Japan, to keep all of your security eggs in the American basket.
Just ain't going to happen.
Wow.
Incredible.
If Trump prevails in the Supreme Court with the recounts, how will things play out?
Well, my guess is that the left will get violent very quickly.
Um,.
And if they do, my guess is, regardless of what the Trump administration does, there will be pushback.
Because if he is perceived to be weak or not doing anything about it this time, people will take things, states, cities will take things into their own hands.
Supreme Court Recount Outcomes00:07:25
Wow.
Yeah.
He cannot afford to sit on, you know, sit like he did through these previous protests.
This just is not going to happen.
And I suspect you're going to.
We know, we both know that there has been secession talk in this country in certain states on both the right and the left.
And I think that talk is going to continue and I think it's going to grow.
Because the bottom line is this system is not working.
That's the bottom line.
And we're kidding ourselves if we think it is.
Wow, incredible.
Joseph, it's great to see you.
Thanks for having me back.
A deep voice of insight and sanity in the middle of this monkey business.
That's and sanity, folks, not insanity.
But it may be that, too.
I'm glad you clarified that one.
And as I say, my bookshelf over here loaded with Joseph Farrell books, and I highly recommend everyone go to gizadeathstar.com and buy several copies of each.
Exactly.
The Gilbert Ward book, if you want a glimpse of the future before it happens, Take a good look.
I mean, those are quite an education.
And it's remarkable the things that you do.
And also on your site, the regular blogs that you do, always ahead of the curve.
And yeah, the things that you're putting out there.
Is there anything coming up that you want to tell us about before you go?
Well, this week I'm taking the week off blogging because I, like I told you before, I've been so despondent and moving between despondent and just anger at this whole election thing.
I literally took the week off to.
Just kind of recalibrate and figure out where do I need to go long term.
So there's no blogs this week.
I'll still have my news and views on Thursday and my vid chat this Friday.
I've got some other things going on too that I have to tend to that are personal.
But the blogs will probably commence again next week.
But I am working on a couple of books, but it's slow going research wise.
I don't know if there will be any other books coming out this year other than that Babylon Tower of Babel book.
But I'm aiming to get some research for a couple of books I've been researching.
Like I said, I stumbled across yet another Monmouth thing that just.
Whatever was going on at that point.
This is the one to watch.
This is the one we're going to watch.
Well, looking at it now, it's like.
It's like reading about Kamler and all the weird stuff that he was up to.
It's just bizarre.
It's just bizarre that all of this is going on there.
So, anyway, and I'm working on another book too that may or may not see the light of day.
It just depends on what the research turns up.
So, yeah, I'm staying busy.
Fantastic.
I want to have you back on soon with all the craziness going on, especially if there are any new developments going on.
And just incredible insight, Joseph.
Thank you so much.
Well, thanks for having me back, Daniel.
It's great to see you, sir.
Yeah.
Everyone out there applauds you.
You're getting such incredible feedback in the ideas room here.
So just thank you for your incredible insights.
I'll have to go back and watch it to see what they were saying in chat.
I don't see the chat in this window.
So I'll have to see.
All right.
Thanks, Daniel.
Everyone's so happy to see you out here.
Thanks so much for coming on.
Yeah.
Bye bye.
All right.
We talk soon.
Wow.
Incredible, everyone.
Dr. Joseph Farrell just blown our minds with the deep, deep, deep research that he's done.
And uniquely suited to see what's going on with everything that we've been reporting on the deep state election that's been taking place.
You guys have been outstanding in the ideas room, and I really appreciate it.
We did not have Miss Olivia tonight, so we didn't get to get to questions, but we'll be back with a new X series, and Miss Olivia will be taking your questions for that as her fan mail piles up.
But it's great to see a couple of shout outs there for Robin Mead, a cult fan, Kate.
Third Eye Focus, Groovy Beans, been holding down the fort, doing a great job moderating tonight.
Thank you so much.
Carly from Dimensions Beyond was on earlier.
And we've got Mad Max out there, Stacy Marie, JD, We Are Sovereign, Kimber, Kathleen St. Clair.
Just great, incredible insights from Dr. Farrell tonight.
And as only he can really see the situation moving from that COG perspective to the deep.
Geopolitical side, and no one knows the geopolitics better than Dr. Farrell.
So just incredible.
And we will see you all.
I want you to go to darkjournalist.com, by the way, and sign up for the free newsletter there.
That way, you and I can stay in touch, and we have that loop going so that if they do shut down the social media end of it, especially, you know, they're trying to get rid of all the good content online, we'll still have that pipeline with each other.
And you want to make sure that you do that.
And also, if you are Inclined, get behind the program and subscribe because there's so many incredible things that we have coming up for you.
And we really thank all of our subscribers for keeping the show afloat and for all you super chatters tonight who I didn't get to shout out because we didn't have Miss Olivia.
Thank you.
We appreciate your support and the breakaway civilizations out there.
It's great to see you.
And Esoteric Gold, David Donaway, just great faces in the ideas room.
Michael Goldpee, And we will have you back on Friday with a new episode and also part two of my interview, exclusive interview with Russell Targ, coming up.
Just incredible times that we're living in.
And we're trying to do as much coverage on this very unusual election as it ties into everything that we've been doing in the X series.
So we really appreciate everyone being here.
And thank you so much for spending the time with us.
We will see you all on Friday.
Evening, and I will also say that if there are any breaking news around the election, of course, I will bring that to you with special reports.
And as I said, at darkjournalist.com, you want to sign up for our newsletter.
And what else is going on?
Well, I guess that pretty much covers everything.
We will catch you all Friday.
And you know, it says end broadcast, but really, it never really ends, as you know.