Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 31, 2025 - The David Knight Show

03:01:27

Mon Episode #1980: Brainless Bodyoids, “Liberation Day?” Satanists on Parade

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 31st of March, year of our Lord 2025.
	Well, tomorrow is going to be Liberation Day, where we all get richer because of higher taxes.
	Tax our way to prosperity.
	This time it's called a tariff.
	We're going to take a look at the on-again off-again issues with that.
	The fact that JD Vance given a very cold shoulder in Greenland.
	Not a good place to get the cold shoulder, but he got it.
	And yet Trump says we're going to get it one way or the other.
	100% certain.
	He said there's a possibility we might not have to use military action.
	Wait a minute.
	I thought we were the good guys in all this stuff.
	Protecting them from Nazis and things like that.
	That's the video that Trump put out to the people there as propaganda.
	But we'll also be taking a look at the spare parts.
	Yeah, this is something's being floated now by MIT.
	An ethics trial balloon.
	Yeah, let's talk about the ethics of this.
	This brave new world that they want to send us into.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, I just want to begin by taking care of some financial issues here for the show at the end of the month.
	We are just a little over the 75% mark and not enough to get it up to the 7 8's and we had Mary Ellen Moore who has agreed to match funds today and that includes checks that are dated today so just to let you know we're going to be taking tips today and also Since we're talking about this, we're going to be shutting down the stream on ROKFN soon, and we need to get the information out.
	I still had a couple people who tipped us last week on ROKFN.
	And I've mentioned it a couple of times, but it's a three-hour show.
	People don't necessarily hear, you know, when you embed one comment there, people might miss a day of the show or something like that, or they might miss it even if they catch the show that day.
	Here's the situation at Rockfin.
	I have no ill will to them.
	They've treated us fine.
	It's been a great community.
	We've been there for now, I guess, four years, pretty much.
	But the issue is, and there's been some smaller shows, I guess, with a smaller audience, that have been shut down and blocked out.
	But the issue for us is that we can't get our money out of there.
	What they do is, when you send a tip in, it gets changed into a cryptocurrency.
	And they do that because they want to split everything up into small fractions, saying that if somebody has signed up for your show, Then you get a bonus, but then the monthly amount that they sign up for Rockfin is allocated to shows based on what the people watch.
	So they wanted to have something that could be fractionalized.
	So they go to a tokenization type of scheme, securitization type of scheme.
	They create their own cryptocurrency.
	The problem is now, we've never had this problem before, but for several months we've not been able to get money out.
	And so to give you an idea, we've got $800 stuck in there, and if we were to sell it now at the market rate, because there's no buyers out there for the crypto, we could get $4 for it.
	$800 and we could cash that in for four US dollars.
	And so it's less than one half of a percent, and that's not even counting the fact that we'd have to then change it from their currency into Ethereum, from Ethereum into dollars.
	So it actually cost us money to get it out of there, so please don't You know if we're going to try to help the show that's not going to go to us at this point we've given it a few weeks to see and actually given it a few months to see if things are going to change and We don't see it changing so I just want to let you know and so accordingly What we're going to do is because it's difficult to to get the message out to people.
	We're going to stop streaming on Rockfan, and we're going to move to some other platforms, and so we'll tell you more about that as that develops.
	We'll be streaming on Substack, right, Travis?
	Is that correct?
	I'm going to be trying to work that out, but currently we're on BitChute, Odyssey, Rumble, DLive, Twitter, and I'm also going to try to set us up a kick channel, which we'll see how that goes.
	Yeah. So you'll have plenty of options.
	And right now I think the best place is Rumble, personally.
	Yeah. Kick is new.
	That was suggested to us by somebody who has offered us a lot of helpful suggestions and we're going to try to implement those as much as we can.
	But I just wanted to pass that on because it is a real, it's a bad situation.
	Hoping that they can get that worked out, but we don't know.
	So let's talk a little bit about Liberation Day that's coming up tomorrow.
	The White House officials are quietly freaking out.
	says the Daily Mail in the UK about Trump's upcoming Liberation Day tariff announcements.
	These are people who are in the Trump administration anonymously contacting others.
	But it rings true when you look at how erratic and chaotic Trump's response has been.
	Basically the bottom line, they said they're freaking out because nobody knows what it's going to be.
	Nobody even in the higher position knows because it's just about the whims of the emperor.
	Who has no clothes and no clues about what he's going to do.
	The mood inside the White House is verging on panic with just two days to go before, well one day to go now, before Trump's Liberation Day on April the 2nd.
	Putting aside the idiotic proposition that we've always heard from Democrats and verifying what I've always said that Trump is a New York City Democrat, pal of Hillary Clinton, pal of Jeffrey Epstein.
	And so, what would you expect from a New York Democrat?
	You would expect a plan to raise taxes and tell everybody that it was going to be paid by somebody else.
	And to tell you that it's our way to prosperity.
	Where's Rush Limbaugh when we need him, right?
	Except, I think Rush Limbaugh would have been cheering that.
	He would have found some way.
	He became so rabidly partisan.
	He's like Alex Jones or Wayne Allyn Root or you name it.
	Rush Limbaugh had become that hyper-partisan a long time ago.
	But he used to joke about the fact, and Republicans used to scoff at the Democrat idea that we're going to tax our way to prosperity, but now we're going to do it!
	And look folks, we're not talking about getting rid of the income tax, okay?
	Let's put that MAGA myth to bed.
	That is something that has been manufactured by the Trump-sucking media.
	He said once, he said, you know, when this country had tariffs instead of an income tax, it was more prosperous.
	Okay. Well, there's a lot of reasons for that.
	And I, for one, would love to see us collect taxes in a different way.
	One that would allow us at least allow the taxes to be paid anonymously instead of creating a dossier so that we could be more Prosecuted or it could be used as a political weapon against people.
	I've never liked that about the income tax.
	It's too noisy.
	It's too much paperwork.
	It's too intrusive.
	I mean, we had a business, we collected sales tax and we sent it in.
	It was no big deal.
	The big deal was the income tax.
	I had to hire an accountant to do the income taxes for us.
	Uh, but you know, to collect sales taxes and send that in, that's not a problem.
	Europe, we get a lot more money in taxes out of the AT taxes and things like that.
	But it's not really about the taxes.
	And look, it's not about the money anyway.
	There's absolutely no way that they're going to come with a nuclear bomb striking distance of balancing the budget.
	Not a chance.
	Trump was furious with the Republicans because they didn't remove the death ceiling for another two years.
	So he doesn't care about the deficit.
	Democrats definitely don't care about the deficit.
	They're following the modern monetary theory.
	I call it the magic money tree, which says the deficits don't matter.
	And if inflation gets too high, what do we do?
	We just raise the taxes, right?
	Is that what Trump is doing?
	Has he really bought in?
	Is he that much of a Democrat that he bought in the modern monetary theory?
	Is he just doing whatever he wishes?
	Well, who knows?
	Trump is expected to unveil sweeping new tariffs on America's global trading partners.
	No, he's going to be unleashing sweeping new tariffs on American consumers.
	As I was saying, all he did was talk about, well, you know, when America had tariffs instead of an income tax, it was more prosperous.
	And then you got the media saying, he's going to get rid of the income tax.
	No, he's not.
	He's talking about how he's going to modify the income tax.
	He's going to make tax cuts permanent.
	That means he's going to make the income tax permanent.
	Behind closed doors, top administration officials are quietly admitting that they're unsure what the president is actually going to do.
	No one knows what is going on, said one White House ally.
	He inserted a profanity in there for emphasis.
	The emphasis is on the F word.
	Trump's administration's aggressive new tariff push is triggering anxieties on a global scale, with even Trump's staunchest allies bracing for a chaotic rollout.
	See, this is the point.
	This is not about protecting a particular industry.
	This is not about funding the government off of tariffs.
	This is simply about chaos.
	That's what it's about.
	It's about creating chaos.
	The president has signaled more than a trillion dollars in trade could be affected.
	With less than a week to go, even the most basic details, including which countries will be hit, and at what rates, and for which goods, remains undecided, or is constantly shifting.
	There's two things that are emerging from this so far.
	A pattern that looks very Biden-like.
	Biden-esque?
	What do we call that?
	Yeah, I guess Biden-esque.
	Number one, he's targeting countries, so this is really like a sanction.
	And that is one of the key issues behind it.
	The second thing is that he's targeting cars.
	Biden didn't want you to have a car.
	Trump doesn't want you to be able to afford a car, you see.
	Biden was just going to outright ban them.
	Trump is going to make them unaffordable.
	You see the difference?
	The Republicans always do it through money.
	It's just like with the COVID stuff.
	Well, I'm going to give money to the governors to roll out this stuff, whereas Biden comes in and says, if you don't do it, I'm going to take money away from you.
	It's always that way.
	You just declare it by executive order, mandate it.
	Behind the public messaging lies a far more chaotic reality, writes the Daily Mail.
	Trump has repeatedly overridden or contradicted his own advisors on trade policy.
	J.D. Vance, Susie Wiles, Scott Besant have pushed for smaller and more targeted tariff plans, or at least a structured rollout that allows businesses to prepare.
	Now, Treasury Secretary Scott Besant, if you remember, about a month or so ago, when Trump was saying, we're going to roll out 25% tariffs, Besant said, it's going to be gradual, we're going to do it like two and a half We're good to go!
	on his own?
	I don't think so.
	This guy's been around for a long time.
	He's not going to concoct an idea on his own and just throw it out there.
	The same thing in that first issue with Pete Hegsa.
	People said, look, he just made this up.
	No, he didn't.
	Trump changed.
	It's just.
	They had a meeting with somebody somewhere in the Trump administration and it was agreed that we're going to do that He puts us out Trump agrees to it.
	So then he says it publicly.
	Yeah, we'll do it two and a half percent a month for ten months and then Trump changes his mind and Leaves these guys hanging out there as if they just made this stuff up.
	They're not something like I could believe possibly That Pete Hegseth would do it, although I don't think that was the situation with his, but I absolutely don't think.
	Scott Besant is too, too, too cautious politically.
	He's a guy who's been around for a long time.
	I don't think he would do that.
	But the president has fluctuated wildly between levies on specific sectors and blanket tariffs on all countries.
	We may have sectoral tariffs on April 2nd, and we may not.
	Said one White House official this week to Politico.
	No final decisions have been made yet.
	They probably still don't know.
	It'll probably just depend on the mood that he's in when he gets up in the morning tomorrow.
	Even core strategic decisions appear to remain unsettled.
	Administration officials have floated the idea of calculating tariffs reciprocally based on how the countries treat U.S. exports, but the president has shown little interest in that.
	It's too technical.
	I don't want to look at that.
	Earlier this week, He blindsided his staff with a sudden 25% tariff on auto imports.
	As a matter of fact, you could tell that Besant and Lutnik were blindsided on the blanket tariffs against Canada and Mexico to start with.
	First of all, Trump just ignored, as I've said many times, he ignored his USMCA, which is just his own personal relabeling of NAFTA.
	It's kind of like the Gulf of American NAFTA.
	It's his own personal imprimatur that he put onto this horrible trade situation.
	Trump said, I may give a lot of countries breaks and we might be even nicer than that.
	Who knows though?
	And it's this uncertainty that is creating chaos and messing with all the markets.
	It used to be that Trump measured his economic success by the stock market.
	He doesn't care about that anymore.
	And he doesn't care.
	About the price of cars, either.
	He said so.
	He said he couldn't care less about the price of cars.
	Days earlier, he insisted that every country will be hit with a tariff.
	So, who knows?
	So, Tom Graf, Chief Investment Officer at Facet said, I think it would be a mistake to think that next week all of a sudden we're going to get a bunch of clarity I'm sure they're trying to reset with financial markets and to build some certainty, but I don't think the president is going to have a personality transplant.
	Even Trump's inner circle, best economic advisor Kevin Hassett, recently told industry leaders that only 10 to 15 countries, dubbed the Dirty Fifteen, would face tariffs.
	No, that's not accurate, actually, from the Daily Mail.
	I talked about this last week.
	They went on two separate programs.
	One of them, and I forget which is which, one of them said there was going to be 15 countries, like they said here.
	The other one said it was going to be 15% of the countries.
	They don't know.
	There isn't any clear policy.
	Trump says U.S. will use reciprocal tariffs on the European Union, but Trump publicly overruled them and indicated a broader sweep of penalties would come in, reportedly infuriating some within his cabinet.
	A power struggle appears to be playing out between two camps, those advocating for a restrained strategic approach on tariffs and those fueling the president's instinct for confrontation.
	Vance, Wiles and Besant have argued for discipline and predictability.
	On the other side are Howard Lutnick and Peter Navarro.
	Peter Navarro, you know, the guy who ran the program To put ventilators out everywhere.
	You know, tell all the automobile companies, stop making cars.
	Now I want you to make ventilators.
	That hero of MAGA, that Stalin-esque central planner, Peter Navarro, is one of the guys who wants confrontation.
	I guess he wants to put the entire economy on a ventilator now.
	Kill it.
	Yeah. He, he deserved a lot more jail time than he got for the other crimes that they never came after him for.
	Uh, we are the greatest economic team and April 2nd will be the historic day for the American workers, said Howard Lucky Lutnick.
	But others inside the administration are less certain of his motivations.
	He goes to the Oval Office and he tells the president whatever the president wants to hear, said one Trump ally, calling Lutnick a nightmare who backs Trump's instincts without considering broader consequences.
	So Senator Josh Hawley.
	So when we look at the tariffs, he says, this is Trump, not anyone else.
	Mitch McConnell, who doesn't like Trump, of course, but he says, well, we don't have the ability to do anything other than complain.
	He's frozen.
	He's frozen out.
	Uh, but look, Congress should be making the decisions on tariffs.
	They have abdicated that to the president.
	I mean, they've given him, uh, signed over their power to do this.
	And so that's why we get this kind of, it's interesting, you know, whenever we look at something and it's like, well, the Constitution says to do it this way.
	We see the wisdom of the founders and we see the folly of Congress today, our contemporaries.
	They haven't a clue.
	You want to have this type of stuff so that it doesn't reside in the executive.
	So that you don't have this kind of capricious arbitrary vacillating chaotic situation So consumer sentiment is falling very rapidly business owners feel supply chains will be wrecked overnight.
	Oh, well, let's see that's never happened Oh, yeah, that's right.
	It did it happened in 2020 Yeah a capricious arbitrary unnecessary lockdown by the way We've got an update on Sam Bailey.
	They have come after her in New Zealand.
	Massive fine.
	About $90,000 and taken her license.
	Now Sam Bailey has been on in the past talking about the nonsense of the pandemic and she is an advocate for saying we haven't seen any, and she's calling for it, so let's see your scientific evidence of this.
	Unless you want to produce any scientific evidence of viruses, unless you want to show us Isolated viruses.
	We're not going to play along with this game.
	You make this claim, you need to prove it with science.
	Well, they have now taken her license, and folks, it had nothing to do with her position on whether or not viruses exist.
	It was a hundred percent about her questioning the PCR and about her questioning the Trump shot.
	A hundred percent.
	They took her license.
	And we've got more like that coming up.
	She's not the only one that has situations like that.
	A detective in Canada who was investigating SIDS has now been removed as well.
	CDC says that SIDS is rare.
	And even though the CDC also says it's the leading cause of death with infants.
	How is it rare and one of the leading causes of death?
	Well because rare is always the lie that they tell you about this stuff, but getting back to the terrorists Consumer sentiment is falling rapidly worried that supply chains are going to crash suddenly business owners are The president isn't looking at it like they are so the source close to the inner circle if the economy tanks and find the economy tanks he said Because the president truly believes that it'll rebound and the countries will give in so he didn't care if the economy tanked We're talking about
	the lockdowns for the non-existent pandemic.
	If it takes, it takes.
	I don't care.
	You know, we'll come back.
	That's not what is important anyway.
	I've got an agenda here.
	I don't really care what happens to you.
	As a matter of fact, Wall Street Journal headline, the era of cheap stuff was already ending.
	Now comes the tariff threat.
	To accelerate it.
	Because the people around Trump are accelerationists.
	They want to move fast.
	They want to break things so they can rebuild it and build it back better, right?
	Which is what we've been hearing from the World Economic Forum for a long time.
	The era of cheap stuff is already ending.
	Now it's going away.
	Wait a minute.
	That's okay.
	Because of the tax, we're all going to be prosperous.
	Goods are rising after decades of deflation and Trump's tariffs will give an added push.
	It pushes right over the edge.
	Trump says he couldn't care less if automakers raise prices due to tariffs.
	Doesn't matter to him.
	Just like Biden said when he started banning cars for emissions, when he started banning oil, when he pulled down the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and all the rest of the stuff, put sanctions on Russia, which by the way, never hurt Russia.
	It was a bonus.
	They made over $300 billion right away.
	Why? Because the price went up so high, Putin could sell it at a discount And get paid in gold instead of dollars.
	And it was a windfall profit.
	300 billion dollars more than they'd made.
	And of course the EU was violating all of these sanctions as well.
	Buying more gas from Russia than they were giving in money to Ukraine.
	Folks, it's never about what they say it's about.
	That's the first rule.
	Of looking at the statements from these politicians, whether they're Democrats or Republicans, Trump or Biden, doesn't matter.
	It's never about what they say.
	Trump says he doesn't care.
	Foreign automakers raise prices due to tariffs.
	President waved off concerns that his agenda is causing volatility on Wall Street or decreasing consumer confidence, pointing to polling that shows that the share of Americans who believe the country's on the right track is at a record high.
	Well, because they've been told about it over and over again.
	They've been told it by alternative media and some mainstream media who are Trump sucker proxies.
	He says, what I see is when they look at the right track wrong track on the right track was the first time in like 40 years where it was the right track.
	Well, that's his characterization of it.
	I didn't go back and fact-check that.
	I don't really care.
	And I don't really care if people are marching over the cliff like lemmings.
	It is what it is.
	And we know where this is going to head.
	The president said he couldn't care less if automakers raised prices after he announced that he would impose a 25% tax on all foreign-made automobiles.
	But as I pointed out, for American cars, okay, let's say that you're buying a foreign car, all parts made foreign, assembled in another country, and imported.
	The whole thing is imported.
	All at once.
	The average price of a car in the U.S. right now is $48,000.
	I know, that's incredible to believe that, that it's that high.
	That would add, 25% tariff, would add $12,000 to the price of a $48,000 car.
	Now overnight becomes $60,000.
	And Trump says he couldn't care less.
	He doesn't want you to have a car anyway.
	I mean, he doesn't drive cars, right?
	People drive him everywhere he goes.
	Who needs a car?
	I got chauffeurs.
	I got private jets.
	I got gigantic jets.
	Sometimes they're paid for by the taxpayer, sometimes he pays for them out of his fortune.
	But even if you're not buying the whole foreign car, not going the whole foreign car route, because they've distributed the production over Mexico and Canada at the very least, And those parts that are going back and forth, back and forth as part of the Assembly, are going to be taxed as they go back and forth.
	Instead of it raising the price of a car by $12,000, the Trade Association says it'll raise the price of a car $4,000 to $5,000.
	And Trump couldn't care less about that either.
	He's holding million-dollar-a-night fundraisers still at Mar-a-Lago, which the Signalgate crowd All went to attend after giving each other fist bumps and flexed biceps and American flags and fire emojis over mass murder of civilians across the world.
	They go to million dollar night fundraiser.
	They couldn't care less about the lives of civilians in another country.
	And, uh, Trump doesn't care about the price of your car.
	Certainly. Trump said the message is congratulations.
	If you make your car in the United States, you're going to make a lot of money.
	Guess who the only car company that makes everything in the United States is?
	Oh, it's Tesla.
	Elon Musk is going to make a lot of money.
	And I'll just say here, since we just mentioned that, all the stuff that is happening with the protests against Tesla and the protests in support of Tesla.
	I think it's kind of an interesting visual meme as to what has happened in this country.
	Here's a guy who all of his life was pushing the green agenda, ESG, all the rest of this stuff.
	He is a greenwashed billionaire, multi-billionaire, the richest man in history.
	And he got all that by pushing all the stuff that the right hates.
	And then all of a sudden he just reinvents himself just like Donald Trump.
	Just like Tulsi Gabbard.
	Just like RFK Jr.
	They reinvent themselves and all of a sudden these lemmings in MAGA adore them and follow them off the cliff!
	It's amazing to me!
	And so you've got people out there who just a couple of years ago hated Teslas, the conservatives, because they were being used to push through not only a green agenda Not only being used to make private cars unaffordable, but also, Musk was at the forefront of the self-driving car movement, which is about taking away all private cars and having you pay for a ride if you can afford it.
	And Musk has recently reiterated that over and over again, even after he reinvented himself as Dark Maga.
	He's still saying, well, in a few years, nobody's going to own a car.
	They'll be renting rides from him, he thinks, or somebody like him.
	And that's one of the reasons why he bought the White House, is because he wants to make sure that you're renting your ride from him.
	And yet, the MAGA people are out there, oh, yay, yay, Tesla is America, blah, blah, blah.
	Look, I don't support firebombing Car dealerships or recharging stations, the attacks, the lunatic left out there, the leftist radicals now who hate him, who used to love him, now hate him.
	And you've got them literally attacking Tesla car owners.
	They don't have any idea what their politics are.
	We had a woman, I think she was 61 years old, a guy cuts her off in traffic, gets out of the car, runs over to her car and starts beating her inside of her car.
	We had a handicapped woman who had her car vandalized because it was a Tesla.
	They don't know her.
	They don't know her politics.
	This is the mindless radical violence of the left, but let me tell you, in a different way, the conservatives are just as mindless.
	They're out there plotting this Baphomet billionaire who is trying to bring in the technocracy, who wants to take everything from them, especially their cars.
	And they're out there cheering him.
	I just don't get it.
	I mean, people can drive whatever they want.
	I don't care what people drive.
	I care what Musk does.
	That's what I care about.
	Anyway, we're impressed if CEOs, if he told CEOs not to raise prices, Trump said, no, I never said that.
	I couldn't care less if they raise prices because people are going to start buying American-made cars.
	I couldn't care less.
	I hope they raise their prices.
	Because if they do, people are going to buy American-made cars.
	And we have plenty.
	Except that the price of American-made cars is going to go up.
	And what is an American-made car?
	How much content makes it an American-made car?
	Does it have to be 100% here?
	Is there infrastructure to do that?
	Of course there isn't.
	So, of course, you're going to pay a lot more for cars.
	Don't know how long it's going to take before they move their components here to the US.
	Dealing with the Ford of Theseus here.
	Yeah. Either way, he doesn't care.
	And when it comes to eggs, well, here's a solution.
	The USDA is going to keep killing chickens and we're going to import eggs.
	Wait a minute, we're not going to have tariffs on eggs?
	You're going to get our eggs from Turkey.
	There'll be turkey eggs.
	How about that?
	I guess they're bigger.
	I don't know.
	So, yeah, this is where we are.
	It's just his agenda that matters to him.
	Meanwhile, he has appointed Sarah Carter, a Fox journalist, as the new drug czar.
	New drug czar.
	Says she will, quote, protect our nation and save our children.
	Has that worked out for us?
	We've gone through dare.
	We've gone through this is your brain on drugs and all the rest and and listen to what he has to say From Afghanistan to our border Sarah's relentless pursuit of justice particularly in tackling the fentanyl and opioid crisis has exposed terrorist drug lords and sex traffickers Okay, good now do the CIA Sarah?
	Because they're the biggest drug traffickers and he begins with Afghanistan.
	Are you kidding me?
	And come and talking about the opioid crisis Then fentanyl comes out of that.
	Fentanyl is a synthetic drug created by our pharmaceutical companies.
	And they started pushing that when, you know, we were getting record amounts of opioids from Afghanistan.
	I believe that's one of the reasons that we were there.
	We had troops that were guarding the poppy fields.
	So you even had Geraldo Rivera reporting on that years and years ago.
	And you could see the production, it was down less than 10% of the world's supply.
	It went up to the high 90s.
	Throughout our occupation, we were creating opioids.
	We had the CIA creating crack cocaine and creating a crack cocaine epidemic to support their wars in Central America and other things like that.
	But it's not even about promoting the war in Central America.
	The CIA is a drug-running organization.
	It is a terrorist organization.
	The CIA are drug lords.
	The CIA are sex traffickers.
	Look at yourself.
	Look in the mirror, drug czar.
	We don't need a czar in America.
	I'm sick of these.
	That's the first place they use that term.
	As our next drug czar, Sarah will lead the charge to protect our nation and save our children from the scourge of drugs.
	Well, then I guess it's going to get a lot worse.
	Because it is not a law enforcement issue.
	It is not a government issue.
	It's a family issue.
	It's a spiritual issue.
	It's a lot of things like that.
	And if you want to look at the criminals who are victimizing people, look at the U.S. government.
	Specifically, the CIA.
	So, federal energy tax credits will cost more than four trillion dollars, but lawmakers might not cut them.
	We'll talk about that when we come back.
	Save a lot of money, are you?
	Well, are they going to remove some of the things that have made these greenwashed billionaires so rich?
	Is Elon Musk ever going to look at the military industrial complex and those contracts or the NASA contracts with his company?
	You better believe they won't.
	They'll never look at that stuff.
	We're going to take a quick break, folks, and we will be right back.
	Thank you.
	you you You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Alright, welcome back, and I just want to remind people what I said at the very beginning.
	We have matching funds.
	Mary Ellen Moore has kindly agreed to match funds today on this last day of the month.
	We're a bit behind, and so that's any funds, any tips that you put.
	On Rumble, on Zelle, on Cash App, things like that, as well as on any checks dated today.
	So, just wanted to let you know.
	And if you want to know where you can donate to us, go to DavidKnight.News and you can see where you can find the show.
	You can see where you can find live streams.
	As I mentioned earlier, we're going to be stopping the live streaming to Rockfin because, and please don't tip there, because we can't get the money out of Rockfin.
	As I said earlier, it's been going on now for a couple months.
	And they convert it to a cryptocurrency, and there's no buyers for those cryptocurrencies, just to be clear about it.
	So please do not tip there.
	And so anyway, if you'd like to know where you can find us, we're going to be adding some new places where you can find the program.
	We're going to be on Substack as well as Kik and some other places that don't quite have it up yet, but we will be putting that up soon.
	And on rumble we have a waking up around said trying to find that whistler tune.
	Is it available for purchase?
	No, it's not that is but that was based on For a fistful of dollars I did Like the the verse if you will for fistful, it's a it's a instrumental and so I did that and I did the bridge for the good band the ugly and And then we split them into two different breaks.
	But originally I had it as one piece, but we split it because it was about two minutes long.
	I called it Fistful of Ugly, but the one that Whistler did is not available.
	And it is kind of interesting, I guess now if we do a cover of a song, if we do it differently, They're now identifying them as, that changed the Liberty Fanfare, which opens up the show, changed that significantly from the John Williams composition, but it's not a legitimate claim anyway.
	It's from a company in China, which has no copyright claim over anything that John Williams did anyway.
	It's just, I don't even want to deal with YouTube anymore, or these streaming services.
	So yeah, it's not Not available for purchase, but I appreciate that.
	Thank you.
	And on Rumble, gtalent60 is now a monthly supporter.
	Thank you very much.
	I appreciate that.
	Well, as I said, the Federal Energy Tax Credit...
	Before that, I just want to break in and say, for the people on Rumble, I'm going to start working on some custom emotes, so you'll have some fun little things to put in chat.
	Okay, that's great.
	On the Federal Tax Credits, It's looking like it's going to cost more than four trillion dollars.
	As I said, you're not going to see them back away from this greenwashing, crony capitalism, this corruption.
	They're not going to pay any attention to that.
	They're not going to pay attention to the military-industrial complex.
	You know, when I was looking at all these bold claims by Doge, you remember I said, they're not even going to get a trillion dollars out of this stuff, because they're not going to touch the welfare state, the warfare state.
	And they've looked a little bit at the waste, fraud and abuse within the welfare state.
	Not a peep about the waste, fraud and abuse in the Pentagon that I've seen.
	I haven't seen them talk about that at all.
	And I think one of the reasons for that is that Musk is first and foremost, a military industrial complex contractor himself.
	So Republican members in Congress are lobbying to keep the inflation reduction acts tax credits alive.
	They want to keep all that money.
	Flowing to people just like Biden.
	One of the largest talking points in the House and Senate negotiations is the House passed plan to identify 880 billion dollars in spending cuts through fiscal year 2034 and programs overseen by the Energy and Commerce Committee.
	Alright, so understand what they're talking about is nearly 10 years worth of stuff.
	880 billion dollars over 10 years.
	And they're going to look at it.
	They're not cutting anything.
	They're not cutting anything now either It requires substantial reforms or cuts to entitlements though like Medicaid that they may take a look at Lawmakers could target energy tax credits from the Inflation Reduction Act, but they're more likely to do the Medicaid instead if they cut anything Tax credits for renewables for sustainable aviation fuel for and this is sustainable aviation fuel that means a new formulation of That you're going,
	it's probably going to be less efficient, more costly, probably even have a higher carbon footprint by their own measurements.
	But it's a new kind of fuel that somebody has come up with and they're going to make a lot of money with that.
	Nuclear power and also, of course, electric vehicles.
	The bill also gave oil and gas companies access to $500 billion in new tax credits.
	The IRA subsidies have largely benefited wealthy households and large corporations.
	Yeah. Congressional Budget Office had projected that it would cost $370 billion over 10 years.
	However, they have now raised that to $1.97 trillion.
	In other words, more than six, about six times what they'd originally said it was going to be.
	And we're only a couple of years into the 10 years.
	One of the most expensive provisions in the bill is its clean energy investment and production tax credits, which have no expiration date.
	They will only end when there is a 75% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from the electricity sector.
	So you better believe that that isn't going to happen.
	Popular in his own mind.
	That he in an interview over the weekend said that he's thinking about running for a third term already.
	And then he added, I'm not joking.
	And he's not joking.
	Constitution be damned.
	He doesn't care what the constitution says.
	There was a constitutional minute.
	This is not just a law that was passed.
	It was a constitutional amendment.
	Uh, so Trump teased that he might run for a third term, explained to NBC news that he enjoys working.
	And he is, quote, not joking, unquote, about making another run for the office.
	You see, because power is what gives these guys meaning to their life.
	I've always talked about how Hillary Clinton used that phrase, the politics of meaning.
	And I said, stop and think about it, how pathetic that is.
	The meaning to her life is her power, her office.
	And they never think they're going to die.
	Yeah. He's Trump is just like Mitch McConnell or just like Darth Vader Ginsburg, or just like I'm Diane.
	I'm still doing fine.
	Stein, you know, they dropped dead in office.
	They go when obviously they're impaired and they can't do their job any longer, but to them, that's their life.
	They don't see any life outside of ordering other people around.
	And same thing with Trump.
	That's what keeps them going.
	The politics of meaning.
	And it really is pathetic, actually.
	The 22nd Amendment of the Constitution was ratified in 1951.
	It prevents individuals from serving more than two terms as president.
	Eh, who cares?
	It's just the Constitution.
	It's just a piece of paper, right?
	And like with the Second Amendment, what Trump said about banning bump stocks and Red flags and stuff like that.
	Fortunately, I can do that myself with a stroke of a pen.
	I don't really care.
	So, you know, fortunately, the Constitution doesn't apply to President Trump, does it?
	We've seen that over and over again.
	He just does as he wishes.
	There are methods which you could do it, he said, when asked how he could run for a third term on NBC.
	So they said, they said, well, what about Vice President Vance, could he run for the presidency?
	Could he win it and then pass it back to Trump?
	President said such a scenario is one of the methods that he could use to serve as a third term.
	Yeah. He could run Melania, for example, and then she could abdicate, you know, make her a Vita.
	Uh, he said, but there's other things too.
	He said, without elaborating, I like working.
	He said.
	And so, yeah, it is the power that keeps him going.
	Meanwhile, we have one congressman here in Tennessee, Andy Ogles.
	And I talked about this, what a pathetic virtue signaling and ego massaging of Trump this bill was.
	Andy Ogles in Tennessee introduced a resolution just days after Trump's inauguration in January to allow him to have three terms in office.
	Boot-licking sycophant who doesn't care about the Constitution.
	And he said in January, he said, Trump has proven himself to be the only figure in modern history capable of reversing our nation's decay.
	In January, he said that.
	And restoring America to greatness and he must be given the time necessary to accomplish that goal.
	And so he says to that end, I'm proposing an amendment to the Constitution.
	Well, at least he's going to try to amend the Constitution, which means it'll never happen.
	Uh, to revise limitations imposed by the 22nd amendment on presidential terms.
	It's still just virtue signaling and ego massaging and foot kissing by Andy Ogles.
	Pathetic, pathetic display.
	Uh, meanwhile, you talk about, uh, how indispensable, uh, Trump is.
	He's now pardoned a convicted big tech criminal this week.
	And this is from Health Impact News, Brian Shulhavi.
	It's the guy, Trevor Milton, who founded Nikola Motors.
	Sounds like Tesla, doesn't it?
	Nikola Tesla.
	And I remember when it happened.
	I said, why do these people leave Tesla alone?
	Picking on him and dragging his good name through the mud.
	It was an EV startup company that was going to make Cyber trucks and not the cyber truck like we see with Elon Musk, but big 18 wheelers he's gonna make the big rigs and People bought his opium Because you can make a lot of money on Wall Street with if you're good at PR and you're good at running a con game You don't have to deliver product as I've said before when we look at these companies They can operate for
	decades at a loss experienced it when we were in the video business The video business, when we got in, was a fractionalized group of mom-and-pops everywhere.
	And it really was a free market.
	And then you started having the big guys come in.
	A guy who made a lot of money with waste management and services, Blockbuster.
	And it was a model that was created by Couple guys who's another mom-and-pop type of thing, but they they did several stores that were big and so he said I'm gonna buy that I'm gonna Replicate it across the country because I've got a lot of money and he did and they made a profit at first but then Paramount I should say Viacom the parent company of Paramount Bought it and they never made a profit
	after that, but they continued on and Well, same thing was going on with Nikola Motors.
	the um and i talked about this when it happened one of the stunts that he pulled and he was convicted of fraud because he did things like this one of them was he rolled a truck down a hill and That it was operating on its own power, and that was exposed by an investment company that had a series of investigations in them.
	He was sentenced to four years in prison in 2023 for fraud after misleading investors about Nikola's hydrogen and electric trucks.
	He stepped down in 2020 after a damning report from a short seller, Hindenburg Research, and they were the ones who were on him like a cheap suit.
	And they just showed one thing after the other.
	This truck rolling down the hill was just one of them.
	But interesting, interesting name for a research company that is essentially burned down his company.
	The Hindenburg research people burned down his country like a hydrogen balloon.
	Hydrogen Zeppelin, I should say.
	They alleged that he had exaggerated the capabilities of the trucks, that he had faked many publicity videos, and they proved it, by the way.
	Nevertheless, Milton and his wife reportedly contributed $1.8 million to Trump's campaign.
	He was convicted in 2023, and then he contributes about $2 million to Trump's 2024 campaign the next year.
	He also gave $750,000 to RFK Jr.
	And to his Maha Alliance, a political action committee that tried to persuade supporters of RFKJ to back Trump after Kennedy dropped out of the presidential race.
	As Brian Shalhavi points out on HealthImpact.com, he said, Mr. Milton contributed $121,000 directly to Mr. Kennedy's campaign in September after he had suspended his campaign.
	So he lavishes hundreds of thousands of dollars millions of dollars on RFK jr.
	And million, you know hundreds of thousands on RFK jr.
	Nearly a million seven hundred fifty thousand two million to Trump and Lo and behold, he gets a pardon I'll just remind you that John Kiriakou has told the story many times.
	He's told told it on this story on this show that he He was trying to get a pardon because he wanted to get his pension from the CIA.
	He was a CIA whistleblower who went to jail for exposing the lies about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that were obtained by illegal torture done by Gina Haspel who was promoted to the head of the CIA by Trump.
	And so he heard that Rudy Giuliani was giving out pardons and so He visited him and he said we sat down he had a couple of people that were there with him and we talked just a little bit of small talk and then Rudy says I've got to go to the bathroom and he gets up and these two guys say to him it'll cost you a million dollars to get a pardon.
	He's selling pardons.
	And so first of all, I don't have a million dollars.
	Secondly, it wouldn't make any sense for me to give you a million dollars to get like a 700,000 or whatever it was.
	It was less than a million dollars for his his pension.
	He had served the time.
	They put him to jail.
	The only person to go to jail And we had people who tortured illegally.
	We had people who then used lies and got us involved in the Iraq war based on those lies.
	They were promoted and protected.
	The only person who went to prison was the one who told the truth about what happened.
	That's John Kiriakou.
	And he can't even get his pension.
	And so, do you think that these pardons have been sold for quite a while like this?
	So here's it.
	Here's another one 1.8 million dollars to Trump's campaign.
	So I guess you know for his he had to give 2 million.
	I Wonder who the intermediary was on that.
	Mr Milton reportedly became very rich from Nicola even though he never had a working model of anything nothing It was all just a hoax Moderna by the way was like that as well You know that Trump shot was developed by DARPA in the military.
	They gave it To Moderna, Moderna had never had a product that had one pump and dump story after the other, uh, to make money on wall street.
	And one demo, he reportedly used a GM truck and simply replaced the logo with Nicholas to make it look like he actually had a working model.
	And I guess it was all downhill from there, but it didn't neutral roll.
	It got the cameras rolling.
	Okay. Let's just.
	Let the break off here.
	And he's got a new unlimited source of energy.
	It's called gravity.
	And then he was informed about the gravity of the situation, but no problem at all.
	Just $2 million to Trump.
	And he's rolling in dough.
	In 2019, he purchased a 32 and a half million dollar, 2000 acre ranch in Utah.
	The largest purchase ever in Utah.
	He still got the house.
	You only had to pay Trump $2 million.
	I mean, his house cost him $32 million.
	Milton was investigated for sexual abuse as well, and a huge scandal in Utah that involved the attorney general and an associate of Milton who reported this, but then was later found dead by suicide.
	And then the Utah attorney general did not investigate him.
	And then there were future campaign donations.
	For that Attorney General from this guy as crooked as they come take a look at the people that Trump did pardon At the 11th hour.
	They skipped over people like Russell Brick back in 2020 Julian Assange and on and on all the political prisoners that did not deserve to be there Marty Gottesfeld he skipped over all of them and He pardoned some of the biggest white-collar criminals in history.
	I Wonder how much he was paid.
	We'll never know On Rumble, Khan Thank, thank you very much for the tip.
	He said, did you say matching tips today?
	Yes I did.
	Mary Ellen Moore is matching them today.
	We really do appreciate that.
	And thank you for that.
	And on Rumble, Don't Frag Me Bro, thank you very much.
	He says, he who's not angry when there is just cause for anger is immoral.
	Why? Because anger looks to the good of justice.
	If you can live amid injustice without anger, You are immoral as well as unjust.
	I absolutely agree with that.
	That's a great quote.
	On Rumble, Nights of the Storm.
	Thank you, guys.
	Jason Barker, Angry Tiger, thank you very much.
	He says, thanks to Mary Ella Moore for tip matching.
	Check out her work.
	Yes, thank you.
	I should mention her website, freemindfilms.com.
	freemindsfilm.com.
	On Rumble, Geesebusters, thank you very much.
	He says, good morning all.
	He sent me another picture of a bird that had been hit by a car, a small bird on the road.
	He says, looks like bird flu is hitting again.
	I said, yeah, bird flew right into the car.
	Maybe it flew into a Tesla, not a Tesla, a Nikola truck that was coasting downhill.
	Who knows?
	On Rumble, RCF2020, thank you very much.
	He says thank you to the Knight team.
	And on Rumble, I.B. White, thank you for that.
	I appreciate.
	It says, God bless you and your family.
	On Rumble, for Love of the Road, five subscriptions to the show and donated five dollars.
	Thank you so much, and it was for Love of the Road that did that great medallion that we have sold out of, and I am so sad to see that go.
	I loved that medallion, and they went really, really fast.
	Thank you so much for doing that.
	I appreciate that.
	That was a huge help this month.
	Huge help.
	He said, just jumping on to see the tips looking like a tip rally to finish out the month.
	Hoping someone is matching them.
	Yes, it's Mary Ellen Moore of Free Mind Films.
	I said, we'll listen later this evening.
	On Rumble, Just the Tip has gifted five subscriptions to the show.
	Thank you very much.
	Also on Rumble, Seanio9889 says, Hey David, have you heard about Dr. Shiva's journals involving Cytosolve and promising ALS treatments being published in Nature last month?
	No, I've not.
	Not heard about that at all.
	I'll have to look into that.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, folks, and we'll be right back.
	be right back.
	right back.
	Yeah, I guess we're not in Kansas anymore.
	Not the Kansas that we knew.
	There was some crazy stuff happening over the weekend.
	You had some satanic church that's trying to make a name for itself.
	I've never seen their name before.
	And there's a lot of these little organizations out there.
	Satan's got a lot of denominations.
	These are people who say they don't believe in him, but they're still going to use it to raise money.
	We've got a lot of churches like that, too.
	They're all over the place, quite frankly.
	But this is a satanic message that was found at a vandalized Catholic church in Kansas, and it happened just before there was a kerfuffle At the state capitol as well.
	A possible hate crime, they said.
	And they're emphasizing this.
	And let me just say that as a Christian, let's not treat this as a hate crime.
	This was vandalism.
	It was breaking and entering.
	Those are crimes.
	And yes, you can see from what was written there that you can understand what their motivation is.
	Might help you to find the people, but there should never be any such thing as a hate crime.
	Not if we're going to have free speech and the free exercise of religion.
	If you're going to go down this route, there's a lot of people who think that what Christians have to say is hateful.
	And we will lose our ability to say that if you're going to go down.
	Hate should never be a crime.
	Hate is a motive.
	Hate can help us to understand the motive and to catch the criminal and so forth, but it is not in itself a crime.
	If it is, we will have no free speech.
	We'll have no free exercise of religion.
	But they were not exercising their religion, or, well, I don't know, maybe they were.
	Maybe breaking and entering and vandalizing is a part of the Satanic religion.
	Who knows?
	But they broke into St. Patrick's Catholic Church on Saturday morning.
	Extensive vandalism.
	That is a crime, clearly.
	Damage to statues, to candles, to glass.
	They broke in and broke everything up.
	The police chief said this is a reprehensible act of vandalism that will not be tolerated or officers investigators work tirelessly to bring this Suspect to justice and they already caught somebody a 23 year old suspect I guess they could recognize him by his red suit and horns Then he's dressing up to emulate his master in a Facebook post the Kansas Catholic Conference said a satanic website That's
	kind of a giveaway maybe.
	I don't know.
	Anyway, this is the face of evil.
	This is the same type of group that will be holding a satanic worship ritual on the grounds of the Kansas State Capitol on March the 28th.
	And lo and behold, that is what happened as well.
	You can see there, they broke up a statue that was there.
	Yeah, a lot of analysm, breaking and entering and so forth.
	Well, that did happen.
	At the State Capitol, again, and Kansas.
	Now, all this is happening as the culture celebrates the Wicked Witch.
	Yeah, Wicked, you know, Broadway play, now movie, with one of the worst-looking, it probably should win an award for the worst-looking cinematography.
	I've seen Grindhouse films in the 70s that had better cinematography than Wicked did.
	Anyway, they have lost the plot.
	They have lost the ability to make films, you name it.
	The Satanic Grotto is the name of this new little thing, and this is why this guy is trying to make a name for himself.
	It's all about getting attention.
	I'm sorry I mentioned his name.
	Shouldn't mention it, but we'll also mention the name of the leader.
	His name is Michael Stewart.
	He has been detained because he got into a fight at the Kansas State House.
	They wanted to have a black mass inside the capitol, and the governor got involved, I believe, and shut this thing down.
	So they did it out in front.
	And so what was their black mass?
	It was basically a way to mock into what the Catholic Church is doing.
	So they've got like a communion host, And, you know, he wanted to have this thing there and throw it on the ground and stomp it and that type of thing.
	And there was a Catholic guy there who jumped in and covered it and then ate it so that he couldn't smash it up.
	And somebody said, well, wait a minute, it wasn't consecrated.
	You know, I don't know.
	I'm not Catholic, so I don't know.
	But I would think that, you know, in order for it to Be something maybe if you're Catholic you can weigh in on this.
	I don't understand that part of it Why but nevertheless it created a the guy who jumps down to grab it after he after Michael Stewart throws it on the ground They started kicking and beating him and so then the police arrested This guy Michael Stewart people that were them several counter protesters confronted him police tackled Stewart led him away after he and another man began shoving each other and The satanic grotto originally got permission to hold its black mass inside the building,
	but then the Kansas governor, Laura Kelly, ordered the event moved outside due to concerns about its content.
	The non-profit satanic corporation planned to hand out miniature black mass kits, including, they said, consecrated bread and wine.
	I don't know where they got that from.
	They break in.
	Is that what they broke into the Catholic Church for?
	They'd have to steal it, right?
	So several hundred people were there to protest them.
	Twenty people came in support of him.
	But he got what he wanted, which was attention.
	Stuart said he didn't believe in Satan as a spiritual entity.
	Well, wait and see.
	He just wanted to show that religious freedom is for everyone.
	No, he wants to show that religious freedom is for no one, especially Christians.
	This whole point is, they're not about religious freedom.
	They are doing this to shut down religious freedom.
	They're deliberately hateful and provocative because they want to shut down religious freedom.
	That's why they're doing it.
	The Kansas House of Representatives on Thursday passed a 101 to 15 vote A resolution condemning the planned event as an act of anti-Catholic bigotry.
	Fifteen people voted against that!
	I wonder if they're gonna, those Democrats, I can guarantee you that they're Democrats, if they're gonna get re-elected or not.
	A Catholic man stopped the Satanists again from further desecrating the Eucharist by jumping on it and eating it, and then that's where the Fist fight was.
	So, again, he got violent.
	That is also a crime, but evidently, at least there, they weren't coming after him for a hate crime.
	They came after him for violence.
	That's a real crime.
	So I just gotta say, if you don't know Catholic terminology and don't know what the host is, that headline is horrifying.
	Yeah. Consumes host.
	He wasn't talking about a podcast, yeah.
	I wouldn't put it past him, give him half a chance.
	Anyway, the Satanic Temple in Idaho is challenging an abortion ban on behalf of quote, involuntarily pregnant women.
	So this is a different Satanic group that is in Idaho the Idaho Attorney General's office argued that the out-of-state group lacks Standing to bring the suit as it has no actual in-person facilities within the state They don't have the facilities to do this in person.
	He said they have no plans to get facilities to do this in person But they're in New Mexico.
	So what they're going to do is these abortion pills by mail And we know how that works out, don't we?
	By the way, as an interesting sub-note here, LifeSiteNews points out that it was during the first Trump administration that the IRS recognized this satanic group as a quote-unquote church, granting it tax-exempt status and strengthening its claims for religious accommodation.
	And let me just say this, they will always say, we don't believe in Satan, we're the church of Satan and we worship Satan, but we don't believe in Satan.
	Well then you're not a church!
	You don't have any religious beliefs, right?
	So it is not a church, by their own admission.
	And that's, I think, the basis on which we challenge them.
	Say, this is not about your religious freedom, because you just said that you don't believe any of this stuff.
	So one woman who nearly died from getting one of these pills, one of these abortion pills, said she is fed up with the lies.
	She hemorrhaged from the pill abortion and she is at a demonstration over the weekend calling for Planned Parenthood's complete defunding.
	She describes it as a death facility.
	So the senator filled her with false hopes that the abortion would give her an already unstable relationship a fighting chance and it nearly killed her.
	These people are dispensing this stuff and this is something that's happening without an examination.
	They don't know what kind of complications there might be.
	They don't know how large the baby is and all the rest of stuff.
	They don't care about the women.
	They don't care about their health.
	Women can die from this and they don't care.
	A Muslim woman has killed a Christian couple by poisoning their food.
	Why'd she do that?
	They took her daughter to church.
	The Christian couple, the woman, was pregnant.
	And when she poisoned the food of this Christian family, this happened in Kenya, Nairobi.
	When she poisoned the family, her 18-year-old daughter that they'd taken to church also died from the poison.
	Yeah, there's a lot of hate out there, isn't it?
	But of course the crime was murder.
	And in Oklahoma, A battle over religion and schools in Oklahoma could decide the future of the First Amendment.
	The long-time understanding of the separation of church and state, writes NBC News.
	I would say the long-term misunderstanding of the separation of church and state.
	They said, they quoted the head of, the Republican head of The school system there in Oklahoma.
	He said what I'm trying to do is make sure that our kids understand American history I want them to have the freedom to express their religious beliefs in schools.
	That's what it's about It's about the free exercise of religion a God-given right that is recognized specifically in the Constitution So he says I want them to have the freedom to express their religious beliefs in school I believe that that has been absolutely gutted from our school system and it has based on this Nonsense of the separation of church and state that is based on a letter that Thomas Jefferson sent to the Danbury Baptists,
	and they never talk about what that was all really about.
	Instead, that was used by the Supreme Court in the mid-20th century to begin a purging campaign To purge religion out of the school.
	Same thing that the Temple of Satans or all these satanic temples are trying to do everywhere.
	Purge religion out of the school.
	To take away your right to the free exercise of religion.
	As a matter of fact, you've got one of these atheist organizations that are constantly suing people and trying to shut things down.
	They call themselves the Freedom From Religion Foundation.
	That's not what the Constitution says.
	The Constitution says we have a freedom of religion.
	Not about that at all So he said I want them to have the freedom to express their religious beliefs in school That's been absolutely gutted from our school system under his watch.
	The state has approved the first ever religious virtual public charter school That's evidently what this is over he has also proposed placing Bibles in schools and again You can You've got judges who will say you cannot take the pornographic literature that is targeted towards children.
	You can't take out the gender gaslighting literature that is targeted towards kids.
	You've got to leave that in.
	But you can't put it in the Bible.
	That's what our government-run schools are really about.
	And people need to understand that.
	That no matter what some person in one place does, That is what these institutions have become.
	They are thoroughly rotten.
	They have rotted, yes, from the top down, but putting somebody up at the top now is not going to get rid of that rot.
	It's just going to get people to trust that rotten institution.
	NBC says at the heart of the religious school case, and others like it, is the Constitutional First Amendment.
	They are the establishment clause which forbids the government from endorsing one religion over another.
	Nope. No, that is not the Establishment Clause.
	Or setting up its own church.
	That is the Establishment Clause.
	And as I've said it before, you had, when this country was founded, the original colonies, it was a major motivation for the founding of America by Europeans was freedom of religion.
	And because they had been persecuted in various states, all these different states had an official state religion.
	So, a lot of the New England states were Congregationalist.
	In Rhode Island, it was Baptist.
	In Pennsylvania, it was Quakers.
	In Maryland, it was Catholic and so forth.
	And so, you had different states had established religions.
	Now, the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, when it was done in 1789, did not end that.
	Because in Massachusetts and several other states that continued for several more decades it went up to I think the 1840s I don't have the numbers in me in front of me now, and I forget what it is, but in Massachusetts They continued to have an established religion.
	What does that mean that means that it was the official state religion and You were required to pay Money to that that denomination and in some cases you were required to attend And I used to bring this up when we would go up to Williamsburg.
	Remember that?
	I would always talk to the Jefferson character there.
	And again, he's not going to engage me on this.
	He would always pretend, well, I don't know what you're talking about, that type of thing, you know.
	He'd try to stay in character.
	But I would always say, and I brought it up to him two or three times once it was at a conservative think tank, and the conservative think tank didn't want to talk about that either.
	He, I would say, �Well, you were very big on freedom of religion,� and I said, �You also� � I did not want to have an established religion � but I said, �You've also established a university there,
	started giving money to it.� And so I said, �Do you think that an established network of schools Is fundamentally different than an established religion, because they're going to be teaching values and the rest of this stuff.
	And so yeah, he would not engage in that, but I fundamentally see it as the same thing.
	You're not going to have freedom of education, freedom of speech, if you have state-controlled education.
	That's the whole purpose of state-controlled education.
	It's to tell people what to think, to indoctrinate them, not to make them critical thinkers, not to elevate freedom, that type of thing.
	No, it is antithetical to that.
	And whether it's being done by conservatives or by liberals, they all hope to mold the students using the power of the state to think in a particular way.
	We should be very concerned about that.
	Even if it's somebody who thinks like you, even if it's somebody who has your same values, your same religion right now, that isn't going to remain that way.
	And so this is the lie from NBC in one little phrase, to say that you believe in Separation of church and state is to � you cannot endorse one religion over another.
	No, you can.
	That's covered under free speech.
	You can't endorse one religion over the other.
	You cannot establish it, and that's what they don't establish is what establishment is.
	Establishment means that you're forced to go to that church, attend it, and you're forced and or forced to pay for that church.
	The Constitution did not stop that at the state level.
	As I said, for decades Massachusetts and some other states continued to have official state churches.
	What it did was it told Congress, it told the federal government, that the federal government could not choose one of the many different state religions and make that the federal religion.
	That's all it did.
	And this whole thing about the 1802 letter to the Danbury Baptists, they asked him, because there had been a lot of misinformation in the campaign from John Adams, saying Jefferson's got his own Bible, he's going to go out and confiscate Bibles, and he's going to do this and that.
	So he said, are you going to do any of that stuff?
	He says, no.
	He said, there is a wall of separation between me and your church.
	In other words, the wall was built around the federal government.
	Not around the church and what the Supreme Court did in the middle of the 20th century was to put a wall around the church and to put a prohibitions around Individuals as to what they could say just because you're a federal employee doesn't mean that you can't that you have surrendered Your free exercise or religion any more than being a federal employee means that you have to take the trump shot That violates your religious beliefs Or that violates your common sense because it hasn't been tested So,
	no, it's not about that at all.
	And yet, as they say, Walters and others like him believe the Supreme Court got it wrong in the past.
	They did.
	They point out the First Amendment itself says nothing about a wall of separation, and they focus more on their rights under the free exercise clause.
	Well, at least NBC gives you the counter viewpoint, and that is it.
	But it is that viewpoint that, well, you can't endorse a religion.
	In other words, you can't exercise religion.
	You can't say, I believe this.
	I can't believe that.
	You can't say, Christ is King, for example.
	Oh no, we're going to make that hate speech.
	The attorney general there in Oklahoma, a Republican also has vigorously opposed the religious schools plan.
	And so it's a Republican who is pushing back against that.
	So when we look at where this is going to move in the future, I think a good example of where the real issues are.
	is in terms of this, what has now become like an Easter ritual for people at the Daily Wire.
	You know, it began a year ago, saying just before Easter, you can't say Christ is King.
	In response to Candace Owen and an argument that she was having with Ben Shapiro.
	And so that was a kerfuffle that came up last year.
	It's like, okay, well, you know, regardless of whether, I don't really care to debate about what Candace Owens meant by that.
	If she was doing that because she's a Christian, or if she was doing that because she was pushing back in the disagreement that she had with Ben Shapiro over what was going on in political Israel and Gaza, I don't really care about that.
	But isn't it interesting that here we are, essentially a year to the day later, you have the people of the Daily Wire bringing this stuff up again.
	It's like every Easter you're going to have the people at the Daily Wire tell you to shut up.
	You can't say Christ is King.
	Well, as I said before, to say that it is used by radicals, to say that it is used by people who have hatred towards Jews or whatever, who cares?
	I don't care.
	It doesn't change anything.
	Christ is King.
	And it doesn't change anything.
	As a matter of fact, he's king of kings.
	And whether the KKK grabs a cross and burns it, that doesn't change the meaning of the cross for me or for any Christian.
	And if we allow that to happen, think how effective that is for Satan and for the enemies of Christ to shut us down, to shame us if we do it voluntarily, if we submit to that, or to use the government to shut us down, to say that what you're doing is Anti-semitic.
	And again, these people on the right, like Ben Shapiro on The Daily Wire, are acting exactly like the radicals on the left.
	If you disagree with them politically, they immediately call, play the race card.
	Well, you're racist, you're a white supremacist, you're anti-semitic, all the rest of the stuff.
	The people on the left and people on the right are exactly the same.
	And they're all using allegations of hate To take away our free speech and our free exercise of religion.
	So, Johnny Moore, who is a pastor somewhere, I guess, has urged the church to reclaim Christ as King ahead of Easter Sunday.
	There are extremists, there are bot networks that are trying to co-opt this, but again, it doesn't matter.
	Somebody will always do that.
	Just think how easy it would be to shut our name, shut us down if we can't say his name.
	And, again, it's people like Jordan Peterson who's there.
	When I look at the Daily Wire, I mean, has it really become a synagogue of Satan?
	Take a look at Dave Rubin.
	Openly homosexual, and yet he is lauded by the Daily Wire.
	He's lauded by many of these conservatives because that's the only thing that matters, is that he is a Republican.
	And his politics matter.
	But his morality doesn't matter.
	And we're going to say that morality is unimportant.
	Only politics matter.
	Well, then you're talking about politics.
	You're not talking about religion.
	And they're trying to play this ethnic card.
	They're trying to play a race card.
	They're trying to play a religion card.
	And folks, it's simply about politics.
	So they've elevated him.
	They've got Jordan Peterson.
	Who is in a sense Echoing the Germans who used higher criticism against the Bible.
	Well, I'm gonna look at the Bible I'm gonna say I don't believe this and I don't believe that what Jordan Peterson is also doing.
	He's combining kind of the 19th century German higher criticism with an occultic mysticism and that's really what Union Psychiatry is that's what Jordan Peterson is into he's not a follower of Freud.
	He's a follower of Carl Jung.
	And since I don't give a whit about what these so-called psychologists say, I never bothered.
	I always knew that Freud thought everything was about sex.
	Everything was about sexual desire or sexual repression or whatever.
	I realized what Jung was about when R.F.K.
	Jr. was talking about his mystical connection that got him off of his addiction to drugs.
	I think it was heroin that he was addicted to, I'm not sure.
	And he was describing Carl Jung's experience where he had some kind of an event where this butterfly appeared at his window when this was the kind of butterfly that wasn't supposed to be in Scandinavia, wherever Jung was.
	And he saw that as a mystical message from the universe about something that he was struggling with.
	And so, R.F.K.
	Jr. was saying essentially the same thing.
	Yeah, same thing kind of happened to me.
	So, this is a kind of a cultic mysticism.
	This isn't Christianity.
	And you know, when Jordan Peterson and a lot of people were hopeful, I was too, when he started talking about the importance and the majesty of Christ.
	He said, I'm going to read the Bible and everything.
	But then he starts getting back into, you start to realize pretty soon that he is really looking at all this through a kind of Jungian mysticism and a cult attitude.
	And so he's taking the lead now and saying you can't say Christ is king because some hateful people have used it in a hateful way.
	Well, Jordan, you don't get to tell me what I do.
	And you don't get to define what Christianity is.
	You're not a follower of Christ.
	You're a follower of some dead psychologist who has dead ideas.
	Vain ideas.
	And so then you've got Ben Shapiro who elevates political Israel as an object of worship.
	Again, he has said he doesn't believe that Moses is part of the sea.
	He doesn't even believe the Bible.
	Yeah, he wants the land.
	He's going to believe that promise and he's going to take the land.
	So this is what we're looking at, this synagogue of Satan, the daily wire, that is pushing this thing to gag people to say you can't say Christ is King.
	And pushing censorship, by the way.
	Almost one year to the day, another daily wire figure is among the authors of a new report warning extremist actors have co-opted Christian language.
	No, they haven't.
	Some organization coming out of Rutgers, the Network Contagion Research Institute.
	What a pretentious load of nonsense that is.
	And so anyway, he's pushing back this guy and again, I don't know who he is.
	Johnny Moore is president of the Congress of Christian Leaders, whatever that is.
	So they released their report pushing back on Jordan Peterson's report.
	Well, I see your report and I raise you a report.
	And I don't really care who calls whose bluff, I'm not in that poker game.
	It doesn't matter to me what either side says about any of this stuff.
	It all began with a Daily Wire podcaster, Andrew Klavan, also Jewish, who doesn't like the idea that Jesus would be king.
	He said the phrase was being used in an anti-Semitic attack in the wake of the outlet's firing of Candace Owens.
	And so as evidence of this, again, they say, well, Nick Fuentes has said this, and Jake Shields, and so forth, and so on.
	Again, it doesn't matter.
	It doesn't matter what these people say.
	According to the report, nearly half of all ex-posts using the phrase, Christ is King, are driven by figures promoting hateful narratives.
	So they have this research organization at Reuters, and it determines that you are a hateful person, and that if you are a hateful person, and you say Christ is King, then the rest of us have to shut up about it.
	Sorry, it doesn't work that way.
	And we should never be ashamed of Christ.
	We should never be ashamed of the fact that He is King.
	And we should never care one whit about these reports or these groups or about the Daily Wire or the rest of this stuff.
	Listen to the nonsense they're putting out.
	Well, it had a spike around Easter of 2024.
	I wonder why people be saying Christ is King around Easter time, right?
	Well, the time that we celebrate the resurrection of Christ has become increasingly hateful since at least 2021, with a historic maximum of 17.3% in May of 2024.
	What nonsense!
	What utter nonsense!
	Anyway, so, but what Moore is saying is right.
	He's encouraged believers to proclaim the truth that Jesus is King of Kings without reservation.
	He said, My whole call to action was my hope that many, many millions of Christians would actually say Christ is King, more than ever, as a means of, in effect, taking back the phrase from a small group of people that want to use it in a way that is targeting Jews.
	Well, fine.
	If everybody wants to post that there, then, you know, that's going to take down their algorithm.
	Do you care?
	Do you care about this Rutgers group and what they think?
	Do you care about their 17.3% stuff?
	I don't care at all about that.
	If I post Christ is King, it'll be because I believe Christ is King, not because I'm trying to change a poll or an algorithm.
	I don't care about any of that stuff.
	He says, I do hope the Catholics and evangelicals this Easter will post either Christ is King or Jesus is Lord so loud, so frequently, so sincerely, But these threats of hate become irrelevant.
	You know, that is not really where our war is, to that extent, on social media.
	And, you know, just throwing slogans and memes at each other isn't anything that really is going to be helpful, I don't think.
	The bottom line is, people can tell if you're sincere or not.
	If you don't really care about anybody and you want to hand them a religious tract, that doesn't make any difference to them.
	They need to see us living it, because if we don't live it, we don't believe it.
	And if we don't believe it, why should they?
	So as all this is happening, just keep in mind that we have in Israel a civil war.
	Israel is not a monolithic thing, except to people who view it from afar and who have bad theology.
	And bad eschatology.
	They want to see it as some monolithic thing, and they want to combine all of Israel.
	You know, you don't want to talk about somebody and just say, well, I think all Jews are like this, or all Jews are like that.
	Well, that's really what the Christian Zionists are doing.
	They're lumping all Jews together.
	And what we're talking about that is happening in Israel and with Netanyahu is political.
	There's a lot of Netanyahu hooligans who are now doxing people.
	They're using biometric surveillance and Stasi tactics to try to get people deported for speech.
	Look, if somebody is violent, absolutely deport them.
	Like I said before, somebody breaks into a church, breaking and entering and then breaking stuff on the inside and vandalizing it, that's a crime.
	And if people are doing violent, real crime, but hate people, is not a crime.
	Speech is not a crime.
	And I've got a real problem with these Netanyahu-ligans who are out there trying to make free speech a crime, who are trying to destroy our First Amendment rights, when in Israel itself they're on the verge of a civil war, and have been for quite some time.
	They were on the verge of a civil war before Hamas, and this is one of the reasons why a lot of people believe that Netanyahu allowed this to happen.
	And that the Hamas situation was engineered to a large degree by conservatives who wanted to have a very radical group in control so they could go in and take Gaza and take the land.
	After years of warnings from former Israeli leaders and intelligence chiefs that Netanyahu is leading Israel into self-destruction, numerous reports now claim that Israel is on the brink of civil war.
	This is LifeSite News.
	Last week, So which Israel are we talking about here?
	Again, this is a political issue.
	It is a civil issue.
	It could be a civil war.
	Netanyahu had to hold, I think, three different elections before he could finally put together a coalition to govern.
	And there has been this animosity.
	He's firing attorney generals and defying the Supreme Court and this and that.
	And so for Americans to say, well, I'll just follow Israel.
	Well, which one?
	Which one?
	I mean, are you talking about spiritual Israel?
	Are you talking about ethnic Israel?
	Are you talking about political Israel?
	And there are multiple facets of each of those things.
	So what Israel are you talking about?
	And don't tell me that I can't speak freely in this country because of quote-unquote Israel.
	Which one?
	Is it the Netanyahu faction that's out there?
	So Netanyahu said there will be no civil war on March the 21st.
	Well, I guess that ends it.
	Nevertheless, former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said the foundations of state in Israel are shaking.
	We are closer to a civil war than people realize.
	And his latest move, Netanyahu's, was to dismiss Ronan Barr, head of Shin Bet, which is their security services.
	They, by the way, took the blame for Hamas, but also said Netanyahu shared the blame.
	So he fired the head of Shin Bet.
	His firing of the head of Shin Bet has now been blocked by the Supreme Court.
	So again, there's a fight between the executive branch and the Supreme Court.
	Israel's Channel 12 reports extremist National Security Minister Ben Gavir attacked the head of the Shin Bet, Ronan Barr, and tried to strangle him.
	Talk about a civil war, this is like going back to just before our civil war when you had Preston Brooks.
	I forget if he was the one who used the cane or if he was the one who was caned.
	The house on the floor.
	You had one congressman beating another one with a cane.
	Here's a guy trying to strangle him with his bare hands.
	The head of Mossad and the Israeli army chief of staff had to intervene to stop the fighting from continuing.
	On Haaretz, they said, Smotric might deny it, but Israel's right is preparing for a civil war.
	Netanyahu is leading us into a civil war, said Haaretz.
	That is what he wants.
	It will serve his purposes.
	Fire in the streets will strengthen him and increase the size of the national camp, which will unite around him.
	That's what war always does.
	The war with Gaza has strengthened Netanyahu.
	A civil war would strengthen him as well.
	It'll do the same thing to Trump.
	A civil war will enable him to make people forget about all of his terrible failures.
	The October 7th massacre.
	abandoning the hostages, and cut our gate.
	The anarchy in the streets will also serve as a good excuse for canceling the elections of 2026 if the polls predict him losing.
	And so the worst case scenario is upon us, said one individual who is associated the other party.
	Israel's government has just decided to declare non-confidence in Attorney General Gali Baharov-Meara Since there's no such thing in Israeli law, the decision simply means that she will be fired.
	Here we are.
	He's trying to fire the head of Shin Bet, trying to fire the attorney general.
	The Supreme Court is fighting him.
	Again, which Israel are we supposed to bow down and worship?
	I'm confused.
	I don't know which of these false gods I'm supposed to worship.
	A random scroll through social media will reveal the intensity of the anger and the resentment held by each side toward the other.
	A mixture of contempt, glee, violent language is a common sight among both media professionals and public leaders.
	So the Supreme Court of Israel has frozen Netanyahu's dismissal of Ronan Barr and opposes his move to dismiss the Attorney General as well.
	So again, it is not monolithic.
	It is not settled.
	And just keep that in mind when somebody wants to tell you what you may or may not say.
	Thank you very much.
	Well, we are going to stop it because we don't want people to mistakenly make a � if they don't hear the announcement of what happened, as I said before.
	We've got donations that are tied up there that we can't get out.
	Because Rockfin puts them into a cryptocurrency for which there's no buyers right now.
	I don't know if that's going to change.
	Yeah, we'll be phasing it out over the next week or two.
	We just want to give people enough time to migrate over to a different platform that they enjoy.
	Yeah, it's been a very good platform for us, and we've had a good, strong community there, and we don't want to just disappear.
	Yeah, because people think that the broadcasts have been shut down.
	So we're going to try to phase it out.
	I just want to let people know.
	So if you are on Rockfin, try heading over to Rumble.
	Make yourself an account there.
	Join the chat.
	We've got a great community of people.
	It's a lot of fun.
	Yeah, it is.
	It is a great community on rumble atomic dog.
	Thank you for the tip He says rock fan doesn't deserve your support David never mess with a man's money.
	It's something my dad And he says I thank you for the matching funds and again we want to thank Mariela more free mind films calm who is Matching the funds this month and really is kind of her to do that.
	Appreciate that on rumble Garrett sashay says David, keep up the excellent work.
	We appreciate you not pandering to Magda.
	We want to hear honest opinions.
	Well, thank you.
	I may not always be right as I said, but I'll tell you what I honestly think and I'll tell you why I think that.
	On Rumble, Brandon, Grateful Baptist says, Please pray for me.
	I've been battling a neurological condition that the doctor said has no cure and has been getting worse.
	I'm really struggling and it's really hard to work and I'm scared to be honest.
	But I know that God loves me.
	That's the key thing.
	We don't know what this life holds.
	And we never know why we're going through things like that.
	When you look at Job, he struggled.
	He didn't understand what was happening.
	But at the end of his life, he had twice as much of everything as he had taken away from him at the beginning of the story.
	And that includes, especially, his family.
	The Bible enumerates all of his Goats and his cattle and all the rest of his government, he's got twice as much of that.
	And servants and things like that.
	But he wound up with exactly the same number of children that he had at the beginning.
	Except he still had the children who had passed on.
	And so, we don't understand why these things that are happening are happening to us.
	And I understand it's fine to be scared.
	And we'll be praying for you, Brandon.
	And I'm so sorry that that is happening.
	But again, just go back to the fact that God loves you, and just ask Him what He's trying to teach you in this, instead of, why is this happening to me?
	You know, what are you trying to teach me?
	Because that's what this life is about.
	It's about God teaching us.
	And it's about us learning to trust Him every day, and sometimes these challenges are really huge.
	I really am sorry to see that happening.
	On Rumble, Ephesians 6.12, thank you very much for the tip.
	And he thanks us.
	Thank you very much.
	On Rumble, Junk Silver, thank you very much.
	He says, thanks for matching today, Mary.
	I think it's better to keep the show on Rockfan.
	The more ears this reaches, the better.
	Yeah, that's true.
	I mean, you know, I don't know what's happening there.
	We wanted to wait it out and see if they got it together.
	Because we had problems with Rumble at one point in time.
	But that's been solved.
	And we thought, well, maybe they will solve it.
	But it concerns me when people are tipping.
	That's the only thing.
	And I don't know how to turn that.
	We don't have the ability to not accept tips on Rockfan.
	And people think they're supporting the program and they're not.
	And that's the issue.
	By the way, I want to thank Junk Silver.
	Thank you very much, and I've got a list of people who sent checks, and Junk Silver is right at the top.
	Thank you so much.
	Chuck and Robin, thank you.
	Mary N., Kelly M., Imelda D., Jackie and Fred U., Peter G., Gary K., and thank you also for the coin.
	Gary, appreciate that.
	That's very generous, all of that.
	Matt and Monica and Aaron F., thank you all of you for the last week of March.
	Those are the checks that we got the last week of March.
	And finally, Obermensch, thank you very much for the tip on Rumble.
	It says, no retreat, no surrender.
	That's right.
	Well, you know, we go back and we look at history.
	What was one of the rallying cries of the Americans at the time?
	Was, no king but Jesus.
	And now we're told by supposedly Christian, not Christian, supposedly conservative, yeah, Daily Wire's not Christian at all, but by supposedly conservative organization, we're told you can't say Christ is king.
	Our American society was based on that.
	No King, but Jesus.
	Yes, Christ is King.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	be right back.
	You're listening to the David night show On rumble Sam Miller one two three.
	Thank you very much.
	I appreciate that's very generous He says thank you for speaking the truth for encouraging words about Christ.
	Hope this helps it does.
	Thank you very much He says blessings to all that is a blessing.
	I want to talk about this trial balloon of ethics has been thrown out by MIT and It was at the top of drudge.
	I had a lot of people for the articles to me what drudge Focused on was an article from the Sun Which sensationalized some of this stuff saying well, we've got This idea that we could have body oids is what they call it that we're gonna grow human beings and artificial wombs and grow them from stem cells and so forth and so and We'll use them for spare parts We'll use them for organ transfers.
	We might use them to test drugs and things like that You know a lot of these and we might use them for meat is what?
	The Sun says.
	Well, I'm not quite so sure that that's what they were saying when I looked at the at the study, but nevertheless It was off the charts in terms of ethics In terms of lack of ethics, I should say whether they want to use these body weights for meat or not and of course we We are living in a time when we have been we've grown up Watching entertainment,
	dystopian science fiction novels, and these people are doing their best to make every single one of these things come to reality.
	Soylent green, of course.
	That's why we're talking about this.
	I was curious, I thought, what are they coming up with this term, soylent?
	What does that even mean?
	And so, supposedly, it was a combination of soy and lentils.
	And that's what they were telling people it was.
	Well, in reality, it was actually cannibalism.
	Recycled people.
	And in the movie, the movie is based on a book, a 1966 novel, Make Room, Make Room.
	And I, you know, overpopulation.
	So we've got to have make room for people.
	We've got to kill off people.
	Soylent was less sinister right then.
	It was just soy and lentil.
	They kept the soylent.
	And then when they put it in the movie, they made it a lot more Sinister the movie that was done in 73 the adaptation of the of the book that was done seven years earlier but What is it that MIT?
	technology review is proposing and I think that this really is just a probe of public opinion and of the state of public opinion on ethics this is The title of their report ethically sourced and they don't put ethics or ethically sourced.
	They don't put that in quotes So I say ethically sourced spare human bodies could revolutionize medicine the spare is in quotes But the ethics is not in quotes and they should put it in quotes because the ethics are quite questionable it would maybe be a spare human body,
	but the ethics are really questionable and made me think of Prince Andrew, or at least a guy who's formally known as Prince, who wrote his own book called Spare.
	That's what he referred to himself as, you know, in case the older brother died, I'm the spare that they have here to take the crown.
	But the report says, so why do so few drugs that enter clinical trials receive regulatory approval?
	Why is the waiting list for organ transplants so long?
	These challenges stem in large part From a common root cause, a severe shortage of ethically sourced human bodies.
	And so they think that creating stem cells, creating bodies from stem cells, growing them from stem cells, they think that that would be ethical.
	And this gets to the whole issue of what are we?
	And I've had this discussion before with people who are selling transhumanism.
	These are people who look at us as some kind of an accident of nature, as complicated and as complex and as complementary as all of the different things in our existence are.
	I mean, when I say complementary, just look at sexual reproduction.
	How in the world could that evolve?
	It's all got to be there at once, or it doesn't work.
	And one of the things I enjoyed when I was doing homeschooling with the kids, and Ancestors in Genesis has some great curriculum with it.
	As I've said in the past, when I was going through school, they dumbed down biology into comparative anatomy, looking at skeletons even, not even the functioning of the amazing functioning of very, very different animals.
	They just would look at the skeletons and say, well, this skeleton looks like that skeleton, so one must have evolved from the other one.
	Well, the other alternative is that they have a common creator, a common designer.
	And when you actually Look at it from that perspective.
	One of the things that the curriculum and answers in Genesis had that I really loved and anxious to do this with my grandson is the fact that they would talk about the uniqueness of all these different animals.
	Look at the giraffe with its long neck and it's got a special thing under the brain to keep it from blacking out when it's got a massive heart that pumps all that blood to the head that's up so high.
	And so you might be concerned that a giraffe would have this rush of blood and lose consciousness when it dips down to drink some water.
	Well, it turns out there's a kind of a spongy-like thing that absorbs all that rush of pressure in their brain.
	Only giraffes have that designed specifically for them.
	Or take a look at a woodpecker.
	Why is it that a woodpecker can beat its head at a rapid rate incessantly against the wood and not pass out?
	It's also got a kind of cushion there.
	And it has a long sticky tongue that after it gets a hole it can go in there probing for insects.
	Now what good would a long sticky tongue do it if it didn't have the ability to create that hole?
	And it's got feet that let it Latch on vertically onto a trunk all these different things even the bombardier beetle, right?
	Got a bombardier beetle puts these Chemicals together and they have a little bomb that explodes Well, how could that evolve right?
	How if you got those?
	specific chemicals that have make an explosion if they came together and the beetle the beetle itself would explode and I mean, there's all these different things throughout nature that are fascinating to look at how the organisms actually work.
	But what they had us looking at in biology was skeletons.
	They didn't consider the unique function of these things.
	And so when you look at these body-oids, this is a mentality that is rampant in so-called science that essentially removes life out of the equation.
	Where does life come from?
	What is life?
	What is our consciousness?
	And so they look at this, and they take the same approach that Aldous Huxley did in Brave New World, saying, we can make sure that these individuals don't have functioning brains.
	And again, there's not any program that we know of.
	I don't know, maybe some of these Silicon Valley people have got something going on the side that they're keeping hidden from us.
	I wouldn't be surprised.
	But what they're doing is, this part of it, That's part of their problem, isn't it?
	That's one of the reasons why, because they have treated--think about this.
	You go back.
	to the Frankenstein movies, right?
	There's a big deal about the body snatchers.
	They call the guys that would go out, the doctors would pay them to go dig up a recently dead body and they call these guys resurrectionists, right?
	They bring them in so they could do comparative anatomy studies and things like that, have cadavers to study anatomy with.
	Well, it starts out that way and They continue to look at cadavers and people and bodies as a commodity, and what you wind up with is where we are today.
	We have pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer look at living people as commodities, that they're just there for their own enrichment financially, their own profit.
	That's where this eventually leads.
	And so they said in this MIT study that said more than 100,000 patients are currently waiting for a solid organ transplant in the U.S. alone.
	It forces us to rely on animals and medical science.
	And then also the safety and efficacy of any experimental drug must still be confirmed in clinical trials on living human bodies.
	Does it?
	I thought that was over.
	Didn't we get rid of that?
	Yeah, we did get rid of that, didn't we?
	I mean, now the USDA is approving vaccines for animals that we eat.
	They said it can take a decade or longer to complete.
	No, you just say it's an emergency and we're going to do it at warp speed and we're going to skip all the tests.
	That's what Trump did.
	And they said that when they do that, they only get approval 15% of the time.
	You think if they would have taken a decade to get the approval for the mRNA stuff, you think it would have passed?
	Of course not.
	It wouldn't have it wouldn't have even been close So to say that we need to have we need to grow human bodies because we've got to test drugs What a joke that is where these people been?
	You know, they're they're selling you stuff here with this and so When you talk about safety and the efficacy of this they talk about organ transplants and so forth then they talk about the commodifying of humans But they never talk about what a human is And this is what these transhumanists won't do either.
	Zoltan Isfahan.
	I interviewed him with the transhumanist party.
	And I engaged him on that.
	I said, so what is a human?
	You know, what is consciousness?
	Is the brain simply a computer?
	Is it simply like RAM and ROM and you can somehow, if you can grab those stored electrical charges somehow, you can reproduce who I am?
	Is that all that I am?
	Well, of course, it all begs the question as to who created the computer, right?
	If you see somebody's computer, you might ask them.
	If you don't see the label or you don't recognize the case, you might ask them who built it.
	But you don't think that that computer just assembled itself out of random chance processes, do you?
	Nobody does.
	And so the question is, how did we get to this point?
	There might be a way to get out of this moral and scientific deadlock, they said.
	Well, actually, they don't have the way.
	They said, within the realm of plausibility, that we could do something like this.
	So let's think about the ethics involved in it.
	They said you could use stem cells to create structures that seem to mimic the early development of actual human embryos.
	At the same time, artificial uterus technology is rapidly advancing.
	That's something to worry about.
	Seriously. When the government can design humans, what do you think they're going to do to natural humans?
	Other pathways may be opening to allow for the development of fetuses outside of the body, together outside of marriage, outside of the family, outside of motherhood.
	Our government, folks, the CIA, our government has been focused on destroying the family my entire life.
	Deliberately. It is a calculated campaign to destroy the family, to destroy motherhood.
	It's been very successful.
	Most women don't even want to get married, let alone have children.
	Very successful.
	And all of that is preparation for them to be able to do a brave new world.
	And so now we have MIT pushing this as an ethical test.
	So they said, together with established genetic techniques to inhibit brain development, we could make it possible to envision the creation of body oids, a potentially unlimited source of human bodies developed entirely outside of a human body made out of stem cells that would lack sentience or the ability to feel pain.
	Hmm, the Epsilons of Brave New World, right?
	That was what Huxley said.
	Well, you know, we're going to have hatcheries, we're going to have the government create these babies, and I think in the novel they deprived certain ones of oxygen.
	They wanted to have an alpha class that was going to be super smart, so they would give them enhanced materials, because again, all of this, in their mind, is simply material.
	God is out of the equation and all of this.
	And so they would give some of them enhanced nutrients and others they would remove those nutrients from them.
	They said it's essentially cloning someone's biological material to empower that transplanted tissues are perfect immunological match.
	You see, this has been a long-standing, if you want to know about the ethics of this stuff, this is the long-standing ethics, so-called, of the abortion industry.
	Well, it's just a clump of tissues.
	Well, it doesn't feel pain.
	Well, it doesn't have consciousness.
	Even to the extent that you've had some of these so-called ethicists saying, well, we think that you could abort babies up to the ages of two or three.
	Now if this guy has ever had a child or looked at a child close up and I think about this all the time I look at Travis's son yeah, how could you look at a baby and Even a baby.
	He's only like four months old.
	I guess Yeah, almost five almost five.
	Well, you know you think about it.
	There are babies that were five months older than him That are being ripped apart I look at that all the time and think, what a monstrous evil that is.
	These people are talking about doing the same thing.
	We will grow a baby, we'll make sure that it doesn't feel pain, we'll make sure it doesn't know anything.
	Oh, you will?
	And then we'll use it for your benefit.
	And we'll clone it from you and we might have something that is an exact genetic replica of you, a spare, so that we can test these drugs on your spare and see what it does to your spare.
	So that you don't get hurt by the drug.
	You know, they do it in a general case, but they do it in a specific, individualized case.
	This is the ultimate commodification.
	And it appeals to our selfishness, our desire to live forever, our desire to be lovers of self.
	Essentially cloning somebody's biological material to ensure that transplanted tissues are a perfect immunological match.
	A personalized screening of drugs.
	We can even envision using animal body oids in agriculture as a substitute for the use of sentient animal species.
	Oh, you know, that's basically what Bill Gates had been talking about in terms of lab meat.
	They're just not talking about, I don't think at this point in time, who knows, but I don't think that they're talking about humans as lab meat.
	But I wouldn't put the possibility past them.
	They said exciting possibilities exist Yeah, they can't be sure whether such body oids can survive without ever having developed brains though or the parts of brains associated with consciousness Body oids could address many ethical questions in modern medicine offering ways to avoid unnecessary pain and suffering We do not allow broad research on people who no longer have consciousness or in some cases never had it Oh,
	so we'd have to change some of those things here.
	But at the same time, we know that much can be gained from studying the human body and doing that with people who have passed on.
	But again, it brings us back to what are we?
	You know, even animals have a spirit, right?
	They have what I would think of as a soul.
	In other words, they have will.
	They have you know the the part of the the unconscious part of the body that is The brain that is organizing all the different parts of the you know Sending out signals for parts of the body to operate, but also they do have will and They do have basic animal instincts and so do we we have all that but we have something else We have something else that is created in the image of God And so that is the question,
	you know, exactly what are we?
	Are we simply a bunch of electronic signals?
	Are we a clump of tissues?
	No, I don't think we're any of that.
	These people really don't understand what we are, but they have a call for action.
	They said, until recently, the idea of making something like a body oid would have been relegated to the realm of science fiction and philosophical speculation, but now it is at least plausible, possibly revolutionary, and it's time for it to be explored.
	It's time for it to be shut down, this idea.
	This is an abomination that anything like this would even be proposed.
	And it shows you how far we have gone.
	Look, it's not...
	The people you've got to be concerned about, it's not these attention-grabbing media whores at the Temple of Satan.
	It's these people.
	These people.
	They're the ones pushing the real satanic agenda.
	There is no need to start with humans.
	We can begin exploring the feasibility of this approach with rodents or other research animals.
	And then work our way up to humans, you know.
	As we proceed, the ethical and social issues are at least as important as the scientific ones.
	Just because something can be done does not mean that it should be done.
	Of course it shouldn't be done.
	But again, as I said, it's been sensationalized by the Sun and the UK.
	This is their headline out of all that.
	And again, that is sensationalizing and spinning this even beyond what these people are talking about.
	But it boils down to three things.
	Testing drugs, which they don't do now anymore, right?
	The FDA exists to give legal cover to these people.
	And even when you talk about the black box labels for things like antibiotics and things like that, they exist to give legal immunity to the FDA for not doing its job and to the pharmaceutical companies who are willing to treat you as if you were a body oid to do whatever they wish to you to make money.
	So that's why they put the black box labels on.
	And then the doctors don't tell you, the hospital doesn't tell you, the pharmacist doesn't tell you, so they say, go sue the doctor, the pharmacist, or the hospital.
	But hey, the FDA and the pharmaceutical companies have taken care of each other.
	They've given themselves an excuse.
	So they don't have to do testing, so they don't need it for that.
	You look at organ transplants, and that is something that has been couched in abomination from the very beginning.
	Killing, and this is yet another admission, frankly, That they take organs from live people only.
	And then finally the meat stuff, which is where Bill Gates has been spending his career on it.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break and when we come back we're going to talk about what is happening to Dr. Sam Bailey in New Zealand.
	Who blew the whistle on the COVID stuff, has now had her license taken away, $90,000 in fine, lost her license.
	And they're not coming after her because she's challenging them on virology.
	They're coming after her because she challenged them on all of the COVID, the pandemic and the measures and all the rest of this.
	She didn't believe there was a pandemic either.
	And because she didn't believe that, and because she challenged them, They have taken her license and they are punishing her.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	Unlike most revolutions where the people rise against a real economic oppression, in our case here in Boston we are fighting for purely an abstract principle.
	It is, however, not nearly so abstract as the young gentleman supposes.
	The issue involved here is one of monopoly.
	Today the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country.
	Tomorrow it will be something else.
	Sounds of music Sounds of music Sounds of music Sounds of music Sounds of music Sounds of music Sounds of music *Sounds of
	music* Sounds of music Sounds of music Sounds of music Liberty.
	It's your movie.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Bye.
	And we are doing a fundraiser matching today.
	Mary Ellen Moore of freemindfilms.com has consented to match donations today.
	And Karen just handed me a list of Zell contributors.
	Julie W. Susan L. Tom and Nancy K. That is phenomenal.
	Thank you so much.
	That's beyond generous.
	Thank you.
	Policy, Kimberly C. and Wayne H. Thank you all.
	And of course, please don't donate on Rockfin.
	We're still broadcasting there.
	We can't get our money out of Rockfin.
	This has been going on for a few months, as I said earlier.
	So please do not donate there.
	If you want to I know where you can donate.
	You can go to DavidKnight.News.
	We've shortened up, of course, the old website is still there, but we've shortened up the name to make it a little bit easier.
	And on Rumble, Real Balls City said, �Thank you very much for the tip.� And it writes, �Christ is King.� Yes.
	Yes. Let's talk about what happened with Dr. Sam Bailey.
	She and her husband have been a guest here.
	They're both physicians.
	They both questioned the lockdown expose a news.com has a story.
	Dr Sam Bailey is fined and has her medical registration canceled for exercising her right to freedom of speech and her duty to challenge the narrative What does it mean if?
	We are not allowed to criticize science as I've said before Science has only advanced when the consensus is challenged because if the If everybody is following along because of the argument of authority, and again, that's what Francis Bacon said, no, I've got a scientific method.
	We're going to take a look.
	If you've got a theory about something, we have to be able to reproduce it.
	You got to show us your data.
	You got to show us what you did, and we have to be able to reproduce it ourselves.
	Or we don't have science.
	It's got to be testable, verifiable, so forth.
	No, that's a, they want a system that is academic.
	That says, This is true because Fauci says it, or this is true because Harvard says it, or whatever.
	Or, as I've used the example many times, Langley, who was head of Smithsonian, the most respected scientist of his time.
	He was like the Fauci of his time, and he was trying to make a flying machine, and he couldn't do it.
	And you had a couple of bicycle mechanics who were homeschooled who did it.
	Why? Well, because Langley had, because he trusted authority, He refused to challenge the lift tables that were there, whereas the Wright brothers did their own lift tables, because Langley trusted authority.
	He was using bad lift tables, and he couldn't get off the ground.
	But the bicycle mechanics observed how birds operated.
	Which is God's design.
	They questioned the lift tables and did their own lift tables and so they got something that worked.
	But that's the way science works.
	It works when you question the authority.
	It works when you show the data.
	That type of thing.
	New Zealand's Dr. Sam Bailey has been outspoken about the lack of scientific evidence behind the lockdowns, behind social distancing, behind the PCR tests and the COVID injections deployed during the COVID era.
	We should say error.
	E-R-R-O-R.
	Except they didn't make a mistake.
	They planned it.
	It wasn't an error on their part.
	It was an error on our part.
	For videos criticizing the response to the COVID so-called pandemic that she posted in 2020 and 2021, four and five years ago, a tribunal has recently fined her $158,000
	new zealand dollars which is about 90 000 us and canceled her medical registration whether you agree with dr bailey or not says expose news she has the right to air her opinions and the right the duty even to initiate and to engage an open scientific debate That's the whole point.
	You know, we are rapidly getting deeper and deeper into a tyranny that doesn't allow questioning of anything.
	PayPal, I've been debanked by Venmo.
	You know, it's a big scandal, but Mike Waltz and others in the Trump administration had their Venmo list public.
	Oh, they got a Venmo list?
	They're engaged in mass murder.
	They're bombing civilians, but they get to stay on Venmo.
	If I criticize them bombing civilians, if I criticize them mass murdering people through the pandemic, I get kicked off.
	That's the way this works.
	So. Her case is not about science, but it's about censorship and freedom of speech, which is protected under New Zealand's Bill of Rights Act of 1990.
	Her case exemplifies a New Zealand government's intent to silence anyone who asks medical questions or challenges their narratives.
	You see, science has become a religion.
	And they don't want a freedom of religion.
	To them it is a religion, and that you've got a different religion, and we're not going to let you talk about this, right?
	So we're not going to allow the free exercise of religion, because again, science is not about proof or measurement or anything like that to these people.
	It's their religion, scientism.
	And they're going to shut down people who don't share their denomination of this stuff.
	In September 2020, she released a video saying that she would not take a coronavirus vaccine.
	As a consequence, she was fired halfway through filming a second series of The Checkup.
	She used to work on New Zealand television.
	She had a New Zealand television show, The Checkup.
	And so, she goes on television, has the courage to say, I'm not taking that.
	And they fired her.
	Over the years, she has faced significant backlash and legal challenges for her public stance against the COVID so-called vaccine and other health policies.
	She lost some of her employment as a medical doctor.
	She faced ongoing legal battles with New Zealand medical authorities.
	A little over a week ago, New Zealand's Health Practitioner Disciplinary Tribunal ruled that 23 YouTube videos that she posted in 2020 and 2021, mostly relating to COVID, were inappropriate, inaccurate, and misleading.
	According to them.
	Okay, show us your evidence.
	Show us your evidence for PCR.
	Show us your evidence for a pandemic.
	Show us your evidence even for a virus.
	But it wasn't even about, show us the virus.
	It wasn't even about that.
	It's like, you toe the line, you repeat what the official government line is, or we will take away your medical license.
	They said she's best known for her view on the essence, on the existence, I should say, of viruses.
	A prominent advocate for the idea that viruses do not exist, and she has a very convincing, she and her husband have a very convincing book, I interviewed them on it, called The Last Pandemic, talking about a wide variety of things throughout history.
	You know, even 45 years in the UK where they had a cold house, where they tried to figure out how the cold virus was being transmitted, even though they hadn't isolated it.
	They had people who were sick with a cold and people who are not and you volunteer for this they pay you for a weekend or a week or however long you stay there they were Sharing mucus and other disgusting things between people To see if they could transmit this virus never did so they shut this thing down after 45 years no answers But they would never stop and think do I have this virus paradigm wrong?
	Have I created this intellectual abstraction that I can't isolate And show.
	And is that wrong somehow?
	Is there something else that's happening here?
	But that was not what they came after her for.
	It should be noted from the outset that Dr. Bailey's stance on the non-existence of viruses was not included in the list of charges against her.
	Toby Young at the Free Speech Union in the UK said, That's very true.
	Very true.
	Great saying.
	The Medical Professional Conduct Committee submitted that positions that Bailey took in her YouTube videos were, quote, not in the realm of legitimate scientific debate.
	What? What is not allowed in scientific debate?
	Isn't anything up for debate in science?
	We're going to allow you to debate this, but not that.
	Well, that's exactly the way the media operates, and it's the way these mandarins of science operate as well.
	Uh, that it had the hallmarks of conspiracy theory.
	No, you have the hallmarks of conspiracy theory about viruses.
	Your virus is a conspiracy theory.
	If you can't prove it, if you don't isolate it, if you can't prove it, then that is a conspiracy theory, really.
	And so instead of no also, uh, deliberate efforts to undermine or discredit the official position and experts.
	There you go.
	There you go.
	You're telling people the truth and that undermines what we're doing here.
	So we're gonna have to shut you down.
	So the main charges were, number one, Bailey was accused of questioning the accuracy and the appropriateness of PCR testing of COVID-19.
	You mean magnifying something by a trillion times?
	Something that you haven't even isolated?
	Something that you're looking for?
	Making that the basis?
	The fact that you say that somebody is contagious when they're not even sick?
	You know, the older science would say, well, you've got to have a certain viral load in order to be able to pass that virus on to somebody.
	Well, you know, we don't even care about that anymore.
	And of course they don't care about any of it.
	The herd immunity thing, right?
	Those numbers are just thrown out the door.
	Or arbitrarily changed.
	All of it was up for re-evaluation, just like a Trump tariff, you know.
	Number two, Bailey said that the Pfizer COVID vaccine, quote-unquote vaccine, had a short development and testing timeline.
	She said it was not a safe product and alleged that people had been dying as a result.
	Absolutely true.
	She said this multi-country analysis is confirmed.
	Pre-established safety signals for myocarditis pericarditis Guillain-Barre syndrome and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis Other potential safety signals that require further investigation were identified it was just heartbreaking in and Beyond to hear Jack Lawson talk about his mother-in-law Who he said, you know, she's elderly.
	She's English.
	She trusts the government completely.
	She took all the vaccines and then she started having Her toes on one foot turning black.
	And so we're worried that you got blood clots and we're worried that you're going to lose, that you're going to get gangrene.
	So they cut off all the toes on her foot.
	Then the other foot started to cut off all the toes on that foot.
	Then they cut off a foot and another foot and the leg and another leg.
	And I think she's only got part of one leg now, if I remember correctly, but it's just horrific.
	Cut off her arm even.
	These clots just keep coming and their answer is to just keep amputating limbs.
	It's just horrific.
	Yeah, thrombosis.
	Just like when we talk about the SID site.
	Well, okay, that's rare.
	Is it?
	No, it's not actually.
	It's not rare.
	Not at all.
	Number three, Bailey suggested that the COVID-19 fatality rate was much lower than suggested by official figures, and we've seen over and over again on this program.
	We've talked about it so many times that the number of people, it went up slightly in 2020.
	We now know That was hospital procedures and protocol being done by Trump and all of the globalist leaders all marching in lockstep using ventilators and midazolam and denying treatment and using remdesivir and other things like that.
	They increased the death rate but then it shot through the ceiling when the vaccines came out.
	A 2021 study entitled case fatality rate of COVID-19 a systematic review This is the fight that I had with Mike Adams when I was at InfoWars,
	and he was fear-mongering, over-the-top fear-mongering, so he and Alex could sell storable food.
	Which, I don't have a problem with storable food.
	I have a problem with the fear-mongering.
	And I called that into question, over the case fatality rate stuff and everything.
	And he came back and said, well, I'm the only real scientist here, and you don't understand what you're doing in terms of math.
	It's like, oh really?
	What's your degree in?
	He's afraid to say what his degree is in, or whether he got one, or where he got it.
	And what he was telling people was, Full-on lie.
	Disgusting. I've seen this and that's, you know, the same type of game.
	Fear-mongering.
	Number four, Bailey was critical of some figures among the medical establishment.
	She said, unfortunately, scientists like Dr. Susie Wiles seem to become detached from the very nature of human health as they focus on molecular test results and top-down political policies.
	Lyle's was a high-profile advocate of masking of vaccines and of lockdowns in New Zealand.
	So don't criticize your betters Don't criticize the people who run the public health Who don't care about the health of individuals or the public therefore and number five?
	Dr. Bailey suggested that our body's terrain is more important than the effect of viral infection on germs when determining potential COVID-19 outcomes.
	So, again, we won't get in terrain theory.
	Maybe we'll talk about it.
	Try to get her on again.
	Maybe we'll talk about it when she comes on.
	But I want to keep this on the suppression.
	Let me tell you something.
	People who suppress Evidence people who hide facts like Michael Mann with his climate hockey stick and all the rest of stuff people like that are lying to you a Canadian detective who investigated vaccine deaths has now been found guilty Guilty for vac for investigating deaths.
	This is in Ottawa Police detective Helen Gruz has been found guilty of discreditable conduct After she investigated a possible link between vaccination and sudden infant death syndrome SIDS SIDS is when the is when the death of an infant less than a year old cannot be explained Even after an investigation of autopsy and medical reviews in a lot of cases.
	We've had parents Who have been charged with shaken baby syndrome?
	Things like that even even though you know a baby With a large head and a small neck, if you shook the baby enough to kill that baby, you would have broken the neck.
	No, it's SIDS.
	It's SIDS.
	So, according to the CDC, about 3,400 babies die of SIDS each year in just the United States.
	Though the bewildering condition is reported as rare, it is also considered to be the leading cause of death amongst infants.
	So, there you go.
	A leading cause of death They label it rare, and they're done.
	This is what they'll say to you when you or your family member are injured by a pharmaceutical.
	Oh, it's rare.
	That's what the pharmacist said to my face about my son.
	Yeah, it's rare.
	It's not rare.
	It's not rare.
	They lie all the time.
	They kill all the time.
	They treat you as if you were a bodyoid, as if you were a soulless, Mindless commodity for their enrichment.
	That's what this is about.
	This is what the medical industry has become.
	And they're purging anybody who questions that.
	Anybody who shows that.
	Constable Grews, an officer with an exemplary record who received letters of commendation from the public, began her investigation after noticing a sudden cluster of nine SIDS cases in 2021.
	She accessed the Ottawa Police Service database and started contacting the parents of the deceased infants to inquire about the mother's vaccination status.
	She also contacted the coroner's office to determine if the mothers had been vaccinated with COVID-19 injections.
	So she came after the pharmaceutical industry and she came after the Global Genetic Code Injection, the GCI.
	The Trump shot.
	Her investigation was Pfizer's own post-marketing analysis conducted six months after the vaccine rollout, which found that roughly 10% of vaccinated pregnancies ended in fetal or neonatal death.
	So they ended in a miscarriage or they ended in the baby dying shortly after birth.
	And again, this is something that is new.
	They used to advise pregnant women to avoid vaccination.
	Now, with this stuff, with this untested genetic code injection, they were pressuring them, pressuring them to get vaccinated.
	After media outlets reported that Grews was investigating vaccine deaths, she was suspended for misconduct because she had not been formally assigned to investigate them.
	You better have permission, according to them, if you want to investigate Mass murderers who make billions of dollars with mass murder.
	Isn't that the difference right?
	You know Stalin who said death of one person is a tragedy, but death of a million people is a statistic Well, I guess we could amend that to say that you know if Somebody's making billions of dollars and the death of millions of people is just rare Just rare.
	We don't have to worry about that So Doctors who gave the COVID-19 vaccine will be bankrupt by 2030, says Dr. Vernon Coleman, a medical doctor who is retired now, and he does commentary in the UK.
	I would hope that that would be the case, and of course what he's basing it on is, as we've talked about, the black box notification that indemnifies the pharmaceutical company So, hey, we warned you, we got a black box notification.
	It indemnifies the FDA.
	They said, yeah, we made them put that black box warning on there.
	But then if you take the antibiotic or whatever else it is, SSRI, you name it, then they will say, well, the doctor should have told you or the hospital should have told you or whatever.
	If it's a vaccine mandate, the corporations have liability, they would say.
	Except that's not the way that it's working.
	Not in the United States, anyway.
	In theory, that's the way that it should work, and I understand why he's saying that.
	He's saying, yeah, they're gonna hold the vaccine companies harmless, but the doctors, the hospitals, corporations who forced you to do it?
	They don't have any liability for this, so go after them, and we've said that before.
	But here in Tennessee, we just had the Tennessee Supreme Court rule in favor of Blue Cross Blue Shield They fired, and it's not in their capacity as an insurer.
	They were being told, I guess, that Biden was not going to give them money from the federal government if they didn't get all their employees vaccinated.
	Same things that he pulled on hospitals and stuff like that.
	But it was in their capacity as an employer, not as an insurer, that they got sued.
	They told their employees that they had to get the COVID shot.
	This one individual who did not do it was fired, and so she sued them, and now the Tennessee Supreme Well, that's a novel interpretation.
	And it is wrong.
	It's wrong legally, it is wrong morally.
	And then we see NBC, still pushing this stuff very heavily, NBC is now.
	I guess maybe they want to, instead of National Broadcasting Corporation, maybe now they represent Nuclear Biological and Chemical.
	That's what they're focusing on all the time.
	It's time to worry about bird flu and cats.
	No, it's time to worry about NBC and the media.
	Telling you that it's time to worry about bird flu and cats.
	It's the ultimate transing.
	We have bird flu and cats and bird flu and cows and all the rest of this nonsense.
	No. Well, we're going to take a quick break.
	Before we do, I want to thank on RumbleDG8.
	Thank you for the tip.
	He said, David, I'm in the machine and tooling industry and it is slow everywhere in Ohio.
	So much reliance on trade with Canada and Europe.
	It's causing owners unable to make long-term decisions based on tariffs.
	See, that's just it.
	Why the chaos?
	I've said, and I believe that's the case, the chaos covers what they're really up to, which is the digital ID, the digital cash, other things like that they don't want you looking at.
	And that kind of chaos, that deliberate That's the new one.
	Wow, thank you so much.
	That is very generous.
	Lightwright Comics said, vaccines crippled my dad and killed my little brother in 1960.
	stuff. They're just better at lying.
	Yeah, I agree.
	I agree.
	Yeah, it was because it was killing people that they got that protection.
	And it's interesting to engage some of these chat programs and say, why do they have this?
	Oh, well, they have this immunity because there's just so many lawsuits.
	I come back and I say, well, every business that is selling stuff has got the possibility of being sued.
	And a lot of lawsuits, so why doesn't any other industry get this?
	Well, that's a good point that you made there, but blah, blah, blah.
	You know, they don't have any explanation for it.
	That's just a really good point you made there.
	Well, that's obviously the truth, the glaring truth that is there.
	On Rumble, neurodivergent, thank you very much for the neurodivergent one.
	Maybe there's a zero or a two as well.
	But thank you very much, Tiff.
	I appreciate that.
	And again, I'll just mention quickly, I thank Mary Ellen Moore of freemindfilms.com.
	Thank you for matching funds today.
	Said, here's a little something to keep Whistler's nephew fed.
	That's what I call him.
	Travis brought in his son, and I had him there.
	And he's just like, you know, normally he looks at me and he laughs.
	A lot of people do that anymore.
	He thinks that I'm humorous or maybe he likes me.
	I don't know but I think he thinks I'm humorous.
	But he was just spaced out and so I'm trying to engage with him and I look over and I see Whistler behind the board and I'm thinking I probably shouldn't use his name even to get his attention and so I just said Whistler's nephew.
	Of course he doesn't respond to Whistler's nephew but the audience does.
	So thank you.
	Welcome back Travis and congratulations.
	Thanks for all you do, Knights.
	God bless.
	Well, thank you very much.
	It's good to be back, and thank you.
	Yes, I appreciate that.
	Thank you.
	On Rumble, Columbo27, thank you for the tip.
	He says, Christ is definitely King.
	May the Lord bless you all and our nation.
	Have a great day, and thanks for all the information you share with us daily.
	That's very kind.
	Thank you.
	Well, when we come back, we're going to take a quick look at what is going on with Greenland and with Panama.
	Things have changed in Panama as well.
	We'll be right back.
	back.
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Oh, to look around at the patch of ground Known as Mother Nature's Siv Though it's horrible to visit It's a miserable place to live Yeah.
	That's it.
	That was when Charlie Kirk and Don Trump Jr. went there.
	But yeah, it's still a miserable place.
	It's very, very cold.
	Vance couldn't believe how cold it was until he talked to the officials there and he got an even colder shoulder.
	Greenland and Denmark are pushing back on his visit, as we mentioned on Friday.
	Usha was going to go to a dog sled race, and they had initially, she was going to do an appearance at a travel agency.
	Make it a travel hotspot.
	It's a horrible place to visit.
	A miserable place to live.
	But the tourist people backed off and said, no, Greenland for Greenlanders.
	There's a lot of pressure now.
	They recently had an election in all four parties.
	We're against Trump taking over Greenland.
	And so they literally went door-to-door trying to find somebody that would talk to Usha Vance, and nobody would.
	It's a small country, even though it's a giant island, only 56,000 people, and now nobody wants to be ostracized by the other 59,999 people.
	They don't want to talk to the Vances.
	Greenland's new Prime Minister, Well, they don't want to be under Denmark either.
	They want to be independent.
	The U.S. has significantly scaled back.
	It's own Arctic defense spending over the decades, including in Greenland.
	And this is what I said from the very beginning.
	I said, you realize they've had this military base there since the end of World War II.
	When World War II ended, they had 10,000 people there.
	I said, now it's come down to 400.
	Well, actually, I was wrong.
	It's 200.
	I would say there's twice as many people as there really are.
	And there's no military reason for it to be there.
	It was there as an early warning station.
	When they're working on radar and other state things like that in case it was an intercontinental ballistic attack But that is not the issue anymore, and they have satellites and other things like that That's one of the reasons why they've taken it down from 10,000 to 200 people there the Danish foreign minister Rasmussen I Like like the pole like the guy who does the poles, but he's not a pole.
	He's a Dane.
	Anyway, the U.S. had maintained 17 bases and more than 10,000 service members across the territory during the Cold War, but now only had one base with about 200 personnel.
	Vance has a point that we haven't done enough, but I'm a little provoked because it's also the Americans who haven't done enough.
	They obviously don't believe that it is a national security issue.
	They have not increased that military base.
	Now, they may do that as a threat.
	Because Trump says, well, it's possible we could do this without a military thing.
	But he says, I'm going to take it one way or the other.
	That's something of a threat, isn't it?
	Vance's visit brought about some of the largest public demonstrations in Greenland's history, with protesters wearing hats or waving banners with slogans, including Yankee Go Home, which we've all seen.
	But this one, MAGA, Make America Go Away.
	Make America go away.
	That's the new meaning of MAGA for the rest of the world.
	It's a different meaning here.
	The rest of the world sees red as the color of communism, but not here in America.
	We're red.
	We're red states and so forth.
	And the rest of the country, when we talk about MAGA, the rest of the country thinks make America go away.
	Well, real clear politics thinks that this is a great move, actually.
	Just about fell out of my chair.
	J.D. Vance's trip to Greenland is a strong and a smart move, said the commentary.
	This is Ned Ryan, a founder and CEO of American Majority.
	Ned, is that you?
	Trump Vance administration looks magnanimous.
	He said in the face of Denmark's diplomatic slights Americans should applaud the White House's forward-looking goal of boosting US leadership in the Arctic And then he goes to the usual excuse We got to keep up with the Russians in the Chinese, right? We got an Arctic gap, right?
	We've got a nuclear gap, we've got an AI gap, we've got a space gap, and now we've got an Arctic gap.
	And I guess that could be part of the space gap.
	You can't let the Russians have the Arctic, they'll see the Big Berg!
	That's right, that's right.
	It's crazy, but this is always, they keep, is it the domino theory or the gap theory?
	These are the things that they keep using for so-called national security.
	He says, as Russia and China ramp up their own investments in the region, never has it been more important for America to step up and ensure our military presence in Greenland.
	Well, the Greenland prime minister says that the U.S. will not get Greenland.
	So President Trump says the U.S. will get Greenland.
	Well, let me be clear.
	The U.S. will not get it.
	We do not belong to anyone else.
	We decide our own future.
	Newly elected prime minister said he said I think there is a good Trump however said on Saturday I think there's a good possibility that we could do it without military force So it's a possibility What he's saying is it's possible.
	We might use military force is what he's saying His mission seems to be make to make the rest of the world absolutely despise us and it seems like and that he's being very successful He says this is world peace See, it's world peace when we invade other countries, right? When we start a war.
	This is international security, he says, when we start a war.
	And I don't take anything off the table.
	He is threatening them with war.
	What a despicable New York City Democrat.
	Just like Hillary Clinton.
	They partied together.
	They had orgies together with Jeffrey Epstein.
	They're two of a kind.
	Disgusting. Disgusting people.
	Anyway, he said 100% we get Greenland.
	Yeah, 100% he told NBC on the interview.
	Good possibility we could even do it without military force, but possible we would do it.
	So they even put out a fear-mongering video, a propaganda piece, and I didn't put that on the board here, but it's an old Cold War thing.
	It goes back to the Nazi threat, and it's kind of like a why we fight It's about two minutes long.
	And it talks about, you know, the U.S. presence there and how we want to come back and make the world safe for democracy.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	We've all heard it before.
	The autonomous Danish territory, it says, is threatened by Russian aggression and Chinese expansion.
	That's what they say in there.
	Americans and Greenlanders have stood as sentinels at the top of the world.
	Pure fiction.
	That's why we have reduced it from 10,000 to 200 and they are the guardians of the galaxy You know, that's the Space Force is what's left there in Greenland and they call them guardians like guardians of the galaxy and in Panama Black Rocks Panama port deal with CK Hutchinson won't be signed next week CK Hutchinson is a Chinese company out of Hong Kong,
	but they are Under pressure from the Chinese Communists who have taken over Hong Kong.
	And they will not sign a deal next week to sell its two ports on either side of the canal to BlackRock-led consortium.
	And by the way, there's more ports than just those two.
	And no word about what was going on with the other ones.
	They said there's obvious reasons, they said.
	Well, the obvious reasons include an infuriated Chinese Communist Party that sees this company as having bent the knee to Trump and the Americans.
	This is now about influence, and you're going to do what I tell you to do, and not what these other people tell you to do.
	The deal was going to be $19 billion, and would be 43 ports in 23 countries, two of them in Panama.
	But on Friday, the South China Morning Post, which is a mouthpiece for the Chinese government, revealed That CK Hutchinson Holdings will not go ahead with the expected signing of a deal next week to sell its two strategic ports to Panama, with Beijing saying that it will launch an anti-trust probe into the sale.
	Now it's kind of interesting, when we look at the Panama Canal, again it is operated by Panamanians.
	There are some ports that are privately owned by people in different countries and other parts of it, but it's run by the Panamanian government.
	And the Panamanian government, though, because of the pressure from the Trump administration, started an income tax auditing procedure against some of these companies, against CK Holding, to pressure them into being amenable to selling it.
	So the U.S. pressure is Panama.
	Panama uses an audit threat or reality to pressure them to sell it.
	Meanwhile, the Chinese are going to use an antitrust probe into them in order to pressure them to not sell it.
	These kinds of indirect actions are the kinds of things that we see governments doing all the time.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break and when we come back We're going to take a look at what is happening with some various news issues.
	We've got some news about what is happening with a very famous rock band that I'm going to cover when we come back.
	Stay with us.
	We'll be right back.
	Here's a little song I wrote.
	You might want to hear it in your pod.
	You know nothing.
	And be happy.
	Ain't got no cash.
	Ain't got no car.
	But 24 booster shots in your arm.
	Oh nothing.
	Be happy.
	You can't even buy sh** in the store.
	Because of your low social credit score.
	Owe nothing.
	Be happy.
	wooooOOOOOO You'll owe nothing.
	And be happy.
	Be happy and eat the bugs.
	They're doing what?
	In the place they named after me?
	Good thing I have The David Knight Show to keep me informed on the plots of these traitors.
	Making sense common again, this is The David Knight Show.
	B Turner, 170, thank you very much.
	Thank you, David.
	Again, we have matching funds, Mary Ellen Moore of freemindfilms.com.
	As matching funds today, so we really appreciate her doing it and it's including funds that are Checks that are written dated today, so we really do appreciate that we were down quite a bit this month But I saw this headline about the who's Roger Daltrey He said he's going deaf and blind and of course the first thing came in my mind was he still plays a mean pinball but he actually is He is actually joking about it as well.
	I would not have said that if he had not jumped into these jokes as well.
	He said, the joys of getting old mean that you go deaf, and so now I have the joy of also going blind.
	Fortunately, I still have my voice, because if not, I would do a full Tommy, the deaf, dumb, and blind kid.
	But he does play mean pinball.
	Pete Townsend, who was also there at the concert, Roger Daltrey is 81. Pete Townsend is 79. He joked that he was Superman now, said Pete Townsend, after he got his knee replaced and told the audience, maybe I should auction off the old one.
	Elton John had a knee done and he wears his as a bracelet.
	That's kind of creepy.
	He says, unfortunately mine is in three bits.
	However, he added that compared to what those who need the Teenage Cancer Trust, that was a benefit concert they were doing, he says, compared to what they're going through, he says, dealing with this is nothing.
	And, of course, the band has been a patron of the Teenage Cancer Trust, they said, since In 2000, they have been performing concerts that have raised 32 million pounds to help bankroll 28 specialist units and the NHS care workers and specialist nurses.
	And I'm sure now that it has gotten much worse with the vaccines.
	He said, so as we get old, he said, life slows down because it's so much harder getting up and down the stairs.
	But he says it also speeds up.
	That's an interesting perspective, and it is true.
	NBC says that they have a film that proves that Oswald could not have been the shooter.
	And this is coming from Anna Paulina Luna, who is running the committee that is looking at the JFK release of information.
	The Republican congresswoman who is leading a task force on the declassification of JFK and other assassination files made a sensational claim Friday evening.
	Said that NBC News possesses film evidence proving that Lee Harvey Oswald could not have shot Kennedy Now she is working to obtain it She said this in an interview with Jesse waters on Fox News She told waters the task force will be holding an April the first hearing what an appropriate date April Fool's Day People think they're gonna get to the bottom of JFK stop after all these years She said it was made aware to me this evening that NBC.
	Yeah NBC.
	They're featuring prominently in the news themselves, aren't they?
	Anyway, they know all about bird flu, and they know that Lee Harvey Oswald was not involved in the shooting.
	Anyway, NBC actually has a video that's never been seen before.
	We're actually going to be sending a letter requesting that from NBC, because it allegedly shows Oswald near the vehicle when the assassination took place, which means that he couldn't have been the shooter.
	And, of course, there's many, many pieces of evidence that show that he could not have been the shooter.
	Just go to that bank depository thing and look out the window.
	I remember one piece that was done by a guy who was a trained sniper, and he went into great detail about how that would not have worked.
	And so, anyway, Luna said that Oliver Stone, who directed the 1991 thriller JFK, Said that he has seen a secondary copy of the film and that NBC has been sitting on it She said director stone actually told me that he has shown this tape that it was a secondary copy He said that this could blow up the entire JFK investigation What I will also tell you Jesse is he said that NBC has been very very much so guarding this tape So I believe that that tape belongs to the American people We're gonna be sending a letter asking for
	that tape and I would encourage everyone to ask NBC to release that tape to the public Well, besides the fact that NBC is Mockingbird Media, do you for a minute believe that if they had a tape that exonerated Lee Harvey Oswald, that it would still be in existence?
	They would have burned that before reading, you know, or they would have been threatened by the CIA or the powers that be.
	Again, I don't believe any of this stuff is going to show us anything.
	Egg prices have taken a sharp plunge as Americans watch the costs trend downward.
	So what is it?
	Is it the eggopoly that is kind of giving it a rest?
	You know there was talk about how the Attorney General might be looking at their collusion because they have done it in the past.
	They have been found guilty of doing it.
	There was a lawsuit from General Mills and other food companies saying you're gouging us on price and you know three or four large egg companies are fixing the price and they had to pay tens of millions of dollars to them because they were fixing the price.
	So is the egg monopoly Are they going to ease up for a while?
	I don't think that's the case.
	As a matter of fact, we can read between the lines here and that is not the case.
	Is the USA?
	Yeah, this egg issue won't be over easy.
	Well, there's always a sunny side to any of these stories, I guess.
	The USA is still doing the mass killing out there, I think.
	So, the price of eggs has taken a sharp plunge as Americans have watched the cost of grocery This grocery staple go way up and inventories are recovering they said amid a sudden and largely unexplained slowdown in bird flu cases.
	So is the USDA backing off?
	Inventories are recovering?
	I think that's the key.
	The USDA might back off of the mass slaughters.
	Yeah, we just don't have as many bird flu cases anymore.
	You know, they would go in with a PCR test, magnify this stuff to an absurd amount, whatever it was that they were looking for.
	We've got one.
	You know, this is the USDA equivalent of Ghostbusters.
	We've got one and we're ready to believe you.
	We're ready to believe our PCR test as well.
	And we'll kill all the birds on your farm.
	Because we've got one bird here, whether or not the bird is sick, that has blown the PCR procedure.
	But I think the fact that inventories are recovering, ... tells you that these are eggs that were bought in by the Trump administration.
	They said they were going to be importing eggs, and they are importing eggs.
	And so this temporary drop in prices that you're seeing there are them bringing in, I guess we could say, the strategic egg reserve that is from outside the country.
	Just like they would do the strategic petroleum reserve to try to mitigate some temporary shortage.
	Because there's no way That by just stopping the mass slaughter of chickens that the egg inventory would immediately respond.
	It has to be responding by stuff they're bringing in, in my opinion.
	Tommy Tuberville, Senator from Alabama, said, Oh, Brooke Rollins, I'm a big fan of hers.
	Yeah, right.
	We're getting ready to import hundreds and hundreds of thousands of eggs, he said.
	And you know, that's fine.
	But it needs to be a short period of time because we have to protect our farmers here, right?
	So. What's all this stuff about tariffs?
	When we're not even allowed to produce our own eggs here because we've got the USDA breathing down our necks and breathing down the necks of the chickens and killing them by the tens of millions every month.
	Yeah, what a joke.
	We're going to be self-sufficient when the government keeps us from even being able to produce eggs?
	And it is the American government.
	This isn't happening any other nation on earth.
	We have migratory birds.
	They're supposed to be the heart of this epidemic.
	And yet, the other countries that they're flying through, they're not getting sick and dying.
	The birds aren't dropping out of the sky.
	The birds aren't dying in other countries on other egg farms.
	It's all our government.
	It is all an out-of-control bureaucracy, an out-of-control USDA, and it is all crony capitalism working with these big egg companies.
	We've been bringing in eggs from Turkey and South Korea, And we got another couple of countries that we talked to yesterday to try to get the supplies back up.
	Said Brooke Rawlins.
	That's what is happening here.
	This is an artificial stimulus here.
	AstroTurf, if you will.
	So, looking at SignalGate, supposedly, according to Politico, and RT carried the story as well, supposedly, Vance asked Trump to fire Waltz.
	J.D. Vance and other senior officials suggested that Trump fire National Security Advisor Mike Waltz during a private discussion about an incident which he Accidentally included a reporter, but here's the story here that is not covered by By RT or by Politico That is covered actually by Paul Sperry and thank you to Harry Hound who gave me the tip On Twitter Paul Sperry went back and he he called out Waltz Said
	he's a liar.
	He says, if you go back and you look at the events that they've had recently in the last couple of years, Walt and Goldberg pictured together, standing together, he was a featured guest, Waltz was, at the Atlantic.
	Goldberg, the guy who doesn't know how he got on the list, was the moderator there.
	And Now we have seen that Goldberg is actually on Walsh's phone list.
	And not only that, but Paul Sperry said Jessica Tarlov, a Trump critic and Democrat who comments on Fox News, was also on his Venmo list.
	Is he paying her?
	What's the deal with this?
	But they all know that's the situation.
	And so Trump, according to these people who have spoken with Politico, Say that Vance, Susie Wiles, Personnel Chief Sergio Gore all advised Trump that it might be time to cut Walt's loose, but Trump says, no, I'm not going to give the Pearl-clutching Democrats a win.
	We are not going to give them a scalp.
	So regardless of what happens, he's going to keep him around.
	All this sanctimonious nonsense about national security doesn't matter to them.
	That's all it is.
	It really is.
	He says, I don't fire people because of fake news and because of witch hunts.
	Well, fake, these news organizations that are opposed to him is what he is not going to do.
	And he looks at personal loyalty that matters more to him than anything else.
	All the stuff they talk about, national security.
	Vance has now publicly aligned himself and they did the Greenland trip together.
	And so they're presenting a unified face.
	But Politico says that Walt's position is tenuous, citing one Trump ally who said they'll stick by him for now, but he'll be gone in a couple weeks.
	And look, I think that Information Liberation got it right when he said that Walt's is channeling information to Goldberg, who's giving it to Israel.
	That's why he's on his list there.
	Leaking stuff to him.
	Because that's what really matters to these people.
	Meanwhile, we talk about eggs.
	Well, they're going to We've got a lawyer in Texas saying that in Texas, you might lose your license for drinking too much coffee.
	So, not just the eggs, but also the coffee.
	If you get behind the wheel, how high is the limit?
	This is what happens when rights become privileges, isn't it?
	Sorry, we're going to have to pull you over and do a blood test here.
	Maybe do a PCR test.
	Do a PCR test to see how much caffeine you've got.
	Yeah, I think the sovereign citizens are right when they say we have a god-given right to travel You know if I'm not operating a business here.
	I'm not quote-unquote driving Don't expect that you're going to get an honest hearing though.
	I've This is simply not going to happen in court So that to me even though legally they're correct It's a non-starter because the courts are not going to entertain I've seen that happen with people who are tasked tax protesters I knew a guy who went to prison and talked to him personally about it.
	And he said, yeah, I had this all laid out and I get up there to start making my case and the judge says, we're not talking about that.
	Next. No, we're not talking about that either.
	It's off the limits.
	I've seen them use this in the Bundy situation where you've got people who are ducking because the BLM, the, uh, We're we're threatening to shoot us.
	We've got people are ducking behind concrete and The Bundy's lawyers said why are people ducking down?
	What are they worried about?
	No, we're not gonna talk about that, you know Cuz we're not gonna talk about the fact that they were threatening to shoot people so they'll take all that stuff off Meanwhile, he says a DWI in Texas isn't just about alcohol.
	It can be anything including caffeine.
	You can be driving under the influence It might make you a jittery.
	Maybe if you They pull you over and you kind of walk the line.
	Maybe you walk the line too quickly That's an infraction.
	Who knows but look it's all about Making it illegal to drive and we can see this happening in Hawaii and Honolulu They've now started with speed enforcement by cameras people have their vehicle or speed data collected on a Thanks to 15 cameras around the city, they've put some of them in areas that have speed limits as low as 25, so the machine can write you up and make money for them.
	Meanwhile, we have parents are arrested in the UK for complaining about the school on WhatsApp.
	Very interesting to see how this is portrayed in the media.
	They said the parents were arrested in January for allegedly harassing their daughter's primary school with WhatsApp messages.
	police showed up.
	The couple of the parents were detained for eight hours, subjected to searches and to fingerprinting, but no charges were filed.
	Why? Well, because they hadn't violated any laws, I'm sure.
	So the father questioned the school's headmaster's appointment process, leading to a ban from school grounds and from events.
	And so they were upset about that.
	They complained about it on WhatsApp.
	So the police...
	So in other words, it turns out that the harassment and the malicious allegations were coming from the school.
	The malicious allegations were coming from the school.
	The harassment was coming from the police, as evidenced by the fact they arrested these people, kept them for eight hours, and then let them go.
	That's what we're seeing over and over again.
	You got hurt feelings?
	Call the police.
	Call the police.
	They are ready to believe you.
	And they're gonna try to find anything they can to shut this down.
	Well, thank you for joining us and thank you so much to all of you for helping us on this last day of the month.
	Thank you especially to Mary Ellen Moore of freemyanfilms.com for matching this.
	Thank you all of you.
	Have a good day.
	Good evening.
	Tonight's tale is a story of paranoia and a most unexpected perpetrator, the common cow.
	Or, more specifically, what comes out the other end.
	Yes, the air is thick with intrigue, as it seems that in our modern age of propaganda, even a humble bovine's backside can be branded a national security threat.
	The menace is invisible, silent, yet deadly.
	Carefully contrived to panic the masses into accepting the government stepping in, jackboots and all, with their solutions.
	Because who better to stop a gaseous threat than a bunch of political windbags?
	But one must wonder, is this truly about saving the planet, or are we simply being led to pasture?
	Is it merely a MacGuffin?
	The David Knight Show serves as a breath of fresh air for those who still believe that truth can stand up to scrutiny.
	And he's found that the government narrative smells suspiciously like a load of bull.
	So if you want to help others catch wind of the BS being shoveled out of Washington, please consider supporting the show.
	And now back to our regularly scheduled program.

▲