Silencing Dissent: Dr. Sam Bailey’s License Ripped for Defying COVID Lies
|
Time
Text
Dr. Sam Bailey she and her husband have been a guest here.
They're both physicians and They both questioned the lockdown expose a news.com has a story.
Dr Sam Bailey is fined and has her medical registration Canceled for exercising her right to freedom of speech and her duty to challenge the narrative What does it mean if we are not allowed to criticize science as I've said before?
Science has only advanced when the consensus is challenged.
Because if everybody is following along because of the argument of authority, and again that's what Francis Bacon said, now I've got a scientific method.
We're gonna take a look, if you've got a theory about something, we have to be able to reproduce it.
You gotta show us your data, you gotta show us what you did, and we have to be able to reproduce it ourselves.
Or we don't have science.
It's gotta be testable, verifiable, so forth.
No, they want a system that is academic, that says this is true because Fauci says it, or this is true because Harvard says it, or whatever.
I've used the example many times of Langley, who was head of Smithsonian, the most respected scientist of his time.
He was like the Fauci of his time, and he was trying to make a flying machine, and he couldn't do it.
And you had a couple of bicycle mechanics who were homeschooled who did it.
Why? Well, because Langley had, because he trusted authority, he refused to challenge the lift tables that were there.
Whereas the Wright brothers did their own lift tables, because Langley trusted authority.
He was using bad lift tables and he couldn't get off the ground.
But the bicycle mechanics observed How birds operated, which is God's design.
They questioned the lift tables and did their own lift tables, and so they got something that worked.
But that's the way science works.
It works when you question the authority.
It works when you show the data, that type of thing.
New Zealand's Dr. Sam Bailey has been outspoken about the lack of scientific evidence behind the lockdowns, behind social distancing, behind the PCR tests and the COVID injections deployed during the COVID era.
We should say error.
E-R-R-O-R.
Except they didn't make a mistake.
They planned it.
It wasn't an error on their part.
It was an error on our part.
For videos criticizing the response to the COVID so-called pandemic that she posted in 2020 and 2021, four and five years ago, a tribunal has recently fined her $158,000
new zealand dollars which is about 90 000 us and canceled her medical registration whether you agree with dr bailey or not says expose news she has the right to air her opinions and the right the duty even to initiate and to engage an open scientific debate That's the whole point.
You know, we are rapidly getting deeper and deeper into a tyranny that doesn't allow questioning of anything.
PayPal, I've been debanked by Venmo.
You know, it's a big scandal, but Mike Waltz and others in the Trump administration had their Venmo list public.
Oh, they got a Venmo list?
They're engaged in mass murder.
They're bombing civilians, but they get to stay on Venmo.
If I criticize them bombing civilians, if I criticize them mass murdering people through the pandemic, I get kicked off.
That's the way this works.
So. Her case is not about science, but it's about censorship and freedom of speech, which is protected under New Zealand's Bill of Rights Act of 1990.
Her case exemplifies a New Zealand government's intent to silence anyone who asks medical questions or challenges their narratives.
You see, science has become a religion.
And they don't want a freedom of religion.
To them it is a religion, and that you've got a different religion, and we're not going to let you talk about this, right?
So we're not going to allow the free exercise of religion, because again, science is not about proof or measurement or anything like that to these people.
It's their religion, scientism.
And they're going to shut down people who don't share their denomination of this stuff.
In September 2020, she released a video saying that she would not take a coronavirus vaccine.
As a consequence, she was fired halfway through filming a second series of The Checkup.
She used to work on New Zealand television.
She had a New Zealand television show, The Checkup.
And so, she goes on television and has the courage to say, I'm not taking that.
And they fired her.
Over the years, she has faced significant backlash and legal challenges for her public stance against the COVID so-called vaccine and other health policies.
She lost some of her employment as a medical doctor.
She faced ongoing legal battles with New Zealand medical authorities.
A little over a week ago, New Zealand's Health Practitioner Disciplinary Tribunal ruled that 23 YouTube videos that she posted in 2020 and 2021, mostly relating to COVID, were inappropriate, inaccurate, and misleading.
According to them.
Okay, show us your evidence.
Show us your evidence for PCR.
Show us your evidence for a pandemic.
Show us your evidence even for a virus.
But it wasn't even about, show us the virus.
It wasn't even about that.
It's like you toe the line, you repeat what the official government line is, or we will take away your medical license.
They said she's best known for her view on the essence, on the existence, I should say, of viruses.
A prominent advocate for the idea that viruses do not exist, and she has a very convincing, she and her husband have a very convincing book, I interviewed them on it, called The Last Pandemic, talking about a wide variety of things throughout history.
You know, even 45 years in the UK where they had a cold house, where they tried to figure out how the cold virus was being transmitted, even though they hadn't isolated it.
They had people who are sick with a cold and people who are not and you volunteer for this they pay you for a weekend Or a week or however long you stay there.
They were Sharing mucus and other disgusting things between people To see if they could transmit this virus never did so they shut this thing down after 45 years no answers But they would never stop and think do I have this virus paradigm wrong?
Have I created this intellectual abstraction that I can't isolate And is that wrong somehow?
Is there something else that's happening here?
But that was not what they came after her for.
It should be noted from the outset that Dr. Bailey's stance on the non-existence of viruses was not included in the list of charges against her.
Toby Young at the Free Speech Union in the UK said, That's very true.
Very true.
Great saying.
The Medical Professional Conduct Committee submitted that positions that Bailey took in her YouTube videos were, quote, not in the realm of legitimate scientific debate.
What? What is not allowed in scientific debate?
Isn't anything up for debate in science?
We're going to allow you to debate this, but not that.
Well, that's exactly the way the media operates, and it's the way these mandarins of science operate as well.
That it had the hallmarks of conspiracy theory.
No, you have the hallmarks of conspiracy theory about viruses Your virus is a conspiracy theory if you can't prove it if you don't isolate it if you can't prove it then that is a conspiracy theory really and so instead of no also Deliberate efforts to undermine or discredit the official position and experts.
There you go There you go You're telling people the truth and that undermines what we're doing here.
So we're gonna have to shut you down.
So the main charges were, number one, Bailey was accused of questioning the accuracy and the appropriateness of PCR testing of COVID-19.
You mean magnifying something by a trillion times?
Something that you haven't even isolated?
Something that I'm looking forward to making that the basis.
The fact that you say that somebody is contagious when they're not even sick.
You know, the older science would say, well, you got to have a certain viral load in order to be able to pass that virus on to somebody.
Well, you know, we don't even care about that anymore.
And of course they don't care about any of it.
The herd immunity thing, right?
Those numbers are just thrown out the door or arbitrarily changed.
All of it was up for re-evaluation, just like a Trump tariff, you know.
Number two, Bailey said that the Pfizer COVID vaccine, quote-unquote vaccine, had a short development and testing timeline.
She said it was not a safe product and alleged that people had been dying as a result.
Absolutely true.
She said this multi-country analysis is confirmed Pre-established safety signals for myocarditis pericarditis Guillain-Barre syndrome and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis Other potential safety signals that require further investigation were identified it was just heartbreaking and and Beyond to hear Jack Lawson talk about his mother-in-law Who he said, you know, she's elderly.
She's English.
She trusts the government completely.
She took all the vaccines and then she started having Her toes on one foot turning black.
And so we're worried that you got blood clots and we're worried that you're going to lose, that you're going to get gangrene.
So they cut off all the toes on her foot.
Then the other foot started to cut off all the toes on that foot.
Then they cut off a foot and another foot and the leg and another leg.
And I think she's only got part of one leg now, if I remember correctly.
But it's just horrific.
Cut off her arm even.
These clots just keep coming and their answer is to just keep amputating limbs.
It's just horrific.
Yeah, thrombosis.
Just like when we talk about the SID site.
Well, okay, that's rare.
Is it?
No, it's not actually, it's not rare.
Not at all.
Number three, Bailey suggested that the COVID-19 fatality rate was much lower than suggested by official figures, and we've seen over and over again on this program.
We've talked about it so many times that the number of people, it went up slightly in 2020.
We now know that was hospital procedures and protocol being done by Trump and all of the globalist leaders All marching in lockstep using ventilators and midazolam and denying treatment and using remdesivir and other things like that.
They increased the death rate but then it shot through the ceiling when the vaccines came out.
A 2021 study entitled case fatality rate of COVID-19 a systematic review concluded the present review results highlighted the need for transparency and testing and reporting policies and denominators used in case fatality rate estimation.
It's also necessary to report the case's age, sex, and the comorbidity distribution of all patients.
This is the fight that I had with Mike Adams when I was at InfoWars, and he was fear-mongering, over-the-top fear-mongering, so he and Alex could sell storable food, which I don't have a problem with storable food.
I have a problem with the fear-mongering.
And I called that into question, over the case fatality rate stuff and everything.
And he came back and said, well, I'm the only real scientist here, and you don't understand what you're doing in terms of math.
It's like, oh really?
What's your degree in?
He's afraid to say what his degree is in, or whether he got one, or where he got it.
And what he was telling people was full-on lie.
Disgusting. I've seen this.
The same type of game fear-mongering a number for Bailey was critical of some figures among the medical establishment She said unfortunately scientists like dr Susie Wiles seems to become detached from the very nature of human health as they focus on molecular test results and top-down political policies Wiles was a high-profile advocate of masking of vaccines and of lockdowns in New Zealand.
So Don't criticize your betters.
Don't criticize the people who run the public health, who don't care about the health of individuals or the public, therefore.
And number five, Dr. Bailey suggested that our body's terrain is more important than the effect of viral infection on germs when determining potential COVID-19 outcomes.
So, again, we won't get into Terrain Theory.
Maybe we'll talk about it.
I'll try to get her on again.
Maybe we'll talk about it when she comes on.
But I want to keep this on the suppression.
Let me tell you something.
People who suppress evidence, people who hide facts, like Michael Mann with his climate hockey stick and all the rest of this stuff, people like that are lying to you.
A Canadian detective who investigated vaccine deaths has now been found guilty.
Guilty for investigating deaths.
This is in Ottawa.
Police detective Helen Grews has been found guilty of discreditable conduct after she investigated a possible link between vaccination and sudden infant death syndrome, SIDS.
SIDS is when the death of an infant less than a year old cannot be explained Even after an investigation of autopsy and medical reviews, in a lot of cases we've had parents who have been charged with shaken baby syndrome, things like that.
Even though, you know, a baby with a large head and a small neck, if you shook the baby enough to kill that baby, you would have broken the neck.
No, it's SIDS.
It's SIDS.
So, according to the CDC, about 3,400 babies die of SIDS each year in just the United States.
Though the bewildering condition is reported as rare, it is also considered to be the leading cause of death amongst infants.
So there you go.
A leading cause of death, they label it rare, and they're done.
This is what they'll say to you when you or your family member are injured by a pharmaceutical.
Oh, it's rare.
It's what the pharmacist said to my face.
Got my son.
Yeah, it's rare.
It's not rare.
It's not rare.
They lie all the time.
They kill all the time.
They treat you as if you were a bodyoid, as if you were a soulless, mindless commodity for their enrichment.
That's what this is about.
This is what the medical industry has become, and they're purging anybody who questions that.
Anybody who shows that.
Constable Grews, an officer with an exemplary record who received letters of commendation from the public, began her investigation after noticing a sudden cluster of nine SIDS cases in 2021.
She accessed the Ottawa Police Service database and started contacting the parents of the deceased infants to inquire about the mother's vaccination status.
She also contacted the coroner's office to determine if the mothers had been vaccinated with COVID-19 injections.
Ah! So she came after the pharmaceutical industry and she came after the Global Genetic Code Injection, the GCI.
The Trump shot.
Her investigation was Pfizer's own post-marketing analysis conducted six months after the vaccine rollout, which found that roughly 10% of vaccinated pregnancies ended in fetal or neonatal death.
So they ended in a miscarriage or they ended in the baby dying shortly after birth.
And again, this is something that is new.
They used to advise pregnant women to avoid vaccination.
Now, with this stuff, with this untested genetic code injection, they were pressuring them, pressuring them to get vaccinated.
After media outlets reported that Grews was investigating vaccine deaths, she was suspended for misconduct because she had not been formally assigned to investigate them.
You better have permission, according to them, if you want to investigate Hello, I guess we could amend that to say that, you know, if, um, somebody is making billions of dollars and the death of millions of people, it's just rare, just rare.
We don't have to worry about that.
it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
And I could, if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful grey MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue.
But he told me to get lost.
Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at the davidknightshow.com.
And David is giving a 10% discount to listeners from now until 2025.
At that price, you should be able to buy me several hundred.
Those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.