Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 28, 2025 - The David Knight Show

03:00:54

Fri Episode #1979: Authoritarian Bullying as a Red Herring to Impose Control Through AI

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Friday the 28th of March, year of our Lord 2025.
	Well, today we're going to look at the rapidly increasing wars that we have everywhere.
	An interesting statistic came out of this, and you know...
	I saw my views repeated only in one place.
	And that's in RT.
	Talking about why is everybody so concerned about signal and national security?
	And they're not concerned about the fact that the U.S. has on average had 46 bombing missions a day on average since the beginning of this century.
	What's going on here?
	Is it a massive distraction?
	Things like Greenland and other issues.
	Is Trump distracting us from these things so that he can run his background operation of a technocracy and a massive global grift so that we own nothing?
	We're going to take a look at the auto tariffs as well and many other things.
	We're going to begin now with artificial intelligence.
	We'll be right back.
	Yeah, I wanted to get to this yesterday.
	It's Bill Gates and Jimmy Fallon, two of your favorite people, of course, talking about the future.
	And Bill Gates pontificating about artificial intelligence within 10 years, he says.
	Isn't it interesting that these futuristic predictions are always a decade or so out?
	Always. Within 10 years.
	We're all going to die.
	The Earth is going to melt down.
	All the polarized caps will melt.
	We'll never see snow again, said RFK Jr. and on and on.
	All these things.
	Well, within 10 years, says Bill Gates, on this former comedy show, it used to be comedy and entertainment, the Tonight Show is now just agitprop.
	It's now just propaganda.
	AI will replace many doctors and teachers.
	Humans won't be needed for most things, said Bill Gates.
	But it's very interesting that he left certain things out, and we'll talk about the three things that he thinks that humans will be doing.
	Three jobs that will be necessary to have humans.
	But let's begin with his statement that he made to Jimmy Fallon.
	Speaking of stablecoins and...
	Oops, sorry, that's the wrong one.
	That's the wrong one.
	Gates, here we go.
	Speaking of stablecoins and the...
	We do have the wrong one.
	The era that we're just starting is that intelligence is rare.
	You know, a great doctor, a great teacher.
	And with AI, over the next decade, that will become free, commonplace.
	You know, great medical advice, great tutoring.
	And... It's kind of profound because it solves all these specific problems, like we don't have enough doctors or, you know, mental health professionals, but it brings with it kind of so much change.
	You know, what will jobs be like?
	Should we, you know, just work like two or three days a week?
	So I love the way it'll drive innovation forward, but I think, you know, it's a little bit unknown.
	Will we be able to shape it?
	And so legitimately, People are like, wow, this is a bit scary.
	It's completely new territory.
	I mean, will we still need humans?
	Not for most things.
	You know, we'll decide.
	I mean, hosting a talk show.
	Definitely. Really?
	Well, we'll decide, you know, like baseball.
	We won't want to watch computers play baseball.
	That's right.
	Yeah. And, you know, so there'll be some things that we reserve for ourselves.
	But in terms of making things and moving things and growing food, over time, those will be basically solved problems.
	Yeah, so will we need Jimmy Fallon and Bill Gates?
	Do we need them now?
	No. Actually, we don't need them at all.
	We don't need them pontificating about what the future's going to be.
	But you notice what he's saying.
	We'll have excellent teachers and doctors, and they'll know all this stuff, and they'll make everything.
	And they'll make what they want you to eat and so forth.
	Look, what this is, folks, is this is about selling artificial intelligence as the expert.
	We've had Fauci, the expert, telling us, well, this is the way that it is, and you just need to obey because I'm science.
	Guess what?
	Same game with AI.
	After people have looked at human experts, as he's saying, they're going to replace all the experts.
	They're going to replace the Fauci's.
	Instead of the Fauci's, you'll have the chats that'll be out there.
	And they will tell you what to do.
	Now, neither Fauci nor the AI will be correct, but you'll just need to fall in line and obey.
	That's what this is really about.
	That's the dangerous aspect of this.
	The really dangerous aspect.
	The idea that Bill Gates, AI, knows what's good for you.
	The debate over exactly how many humans will fit into this AI future is ongoing, they said.
	Well, that's NBC saying that.
	Is that really true?
	Do they get to decide whether or not you fit in the future?
	Are you going to make your future?
	That's the key issue.
	I don't want Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, Jimmy Fallon of all people.
	He doesn't make any decisions.
	He's just a mouthpiece puppet.
	But I don't want these people making decisions for me.
	We don't need them.
	We don't need their technocracy.
	We don't need their dystopia.
	We don't need what they're designing.
	And we need to tell people what this looks like before it gets more difficult to get away from it.
	We will get away from it, given time.
	The question is, are we going to go into slavery first and then have to fight our way out of it?
	These tools only temporarily augment human intelligence.
	One expert, a book published in 2023, The Coming Wave, he said, they will make us smarter and more efficient for a time.
	They will unlock enormous amounts of economic growth, but they're fundamentally labor replacing.
	No, they're fundamentally there to replace God.
	They want to put themselves up as God-like experts.
	And that's what people like Fauci and Gates have been doing for the longest time.
	They want to replace God.
	These people want to be God, and that is their tool to be God.
	The issue is, though, their problem is, kind of like P.G.R.
	Wark said once, he said, well, you know, for the Democrats, government is Santa Claus, and for Republicans, it's God.
	He said the difference is God is real.
	The things that the Republicans want to use it for.
	We're going to make sure that it doesn't work.
	Look, God is real.
	AI is not real.
	God is God.
	AI is not God.
	And we as Christians have very powerful weapons that are not of this world.
	We have prayer, for example.
	And some people are like, well, that's our last resort.
	No, this is the way we change society, folks.
	Knowledge, discernment, and then prayer.
	Because God is the one who is in control.
	God is almighty.
	Not artificial intelligence and not even these rich billionaires who act as if they really know what's going on.
	AI's development does come with understandable and valid concerns, said NBC.
	Gates himself wrote in 2023, he said, AI programs are rife with errors.
	That's another difference between them and God.
	God doesn't make mistakes.
	Not in our life, not in his book.
	He doesn't make mistakes.
	And he knows what the future is going to be holding.
	Not Bill Gates, not Jimmy Fallon.
	So Bill Gates said they're rife with errors.
	They're prone to enabling the spread of falsehoods online.
	And by the way, those falsehoods can be built into them.
	They have people who are programming them with bias.
	They pay humans to bias the AI.
	Do you see what's going on here?
	Let's pull back the curtain and see the little guy back there behind the curtain pulling the levers.
	You pull back the curtain on AI and you see these biases being built in.
	They pay people in other countries $15 an hour to put biases into their artificial intelligence.
	And then they say, lo and behold, the godlike intelligence that is going to rule the world.
	What a sham this all is.
	Folks, it outright lies to us.
	It does.
	This utopia, this dystopia, whatever it is, it's always a decade or so away.
	Kind of like any.
	Tomorrow, tomorrow.
	It's always a decade away, actually.
	So, the bottom line is, you know, we can't have any CO2.
	We can't have any cows because of methane and all the rest of the time.
	Bottom line, we can't have any energy.
	They will determine what energy, what food, other things, what activities we have.
	And they will set all this stuff down.
	But the key thing is that they're going to use AI for surveillance and for control.
	And they will have unlimited energy for themselves.
	And for us, nothing.
	You'll own nothing.
	Well, Bill Gates thinks that there's only three jobs that will survive AI taking over.
	And this person who wrote this, This is on something called Unilad.com.
	I don't know what this is, but I saw it on Drudge because he likes this kind of stuff.
	The guy says, I, for one, will welcome our new AI overlords.
	Well, you can serve whoever you want.
	I will not bow down and serve Gates or any of these people ever.
	I will not bow down and serve AI either.
	Gates has been pretty confident that there are three jobs which AI will keep his hands off.
	And listen to what those three jobs are.
	Kind of sounds like what Bill Gates does.
	Bill Gates thinks he and his interests are indispensable.
	First one, coders.
	Well, he needs to have coders out there.
	Software, yeah.
	Things like that.
	Of course, he never wrote any code.
	He stole it.
	He hired lawyers more than engineers in the beginning, especially.
	And he stole this stuff from digital research.
	Anyway, energy experts.
	You know, people like Bill Gates, who want to tell us what energy we can have and what energy we can't have.
	So, coders that write garbage stuff like Microsoft.
	Energy experts who will tell us what we're allowed to use in terms of energy.
	And then finally, biologists who will tell us what vaccines we must have, what food we have to have.
	The people like Bill Gates who take over the WHO and use it as their own private cudgel to make money from us.
	So it sounds like his job descriptions, you know, software, energy experts, biology.
	Maybe they'll tell us how many people we can have, and maybe we can have AI running Planned Parenthood because the Gates family has been so involved in that for so long.
	So when it comes to biologists, while AI can be used as a tool, it's going to be experts.
	Who will use it for analyzing heaps of data and diagnosing diseases.
	Ah, people like Susan Monterey, Trump's new CDC person, who used AI extensively.
	And she's going to use it to tell you diseases that you're going to get before you've got them.
	This is the next step beyond PCR.
	Well, I'm not sick.
	Oh, but the PCR says that you've got this stuff inside.
	We magnified it by a trillion times.
	And we found whatever we're looking for, which isn't necessarily even a disease, but we found it.
	And so you're going to be taken off to a concentration camp and isolated or whatever.
	Or we're going to have to preemptively vaccinate you for the good of the herd.
	You know, that's the other thing about all this.
	If we go back and we look at the insanity of the masks and everything else.
	I was absolutely convinced when I started telling everybody, you know, I knew what was going on with Dark Winter.
	And I was pushing back against it.
	And right away, they say, get the mask.
	Now you've got to wear the mask to protect other people.
	I say, oh, oh, sorry.
	That's the thing they've been saying about vaccines all the time.
	So you understand that everything's got to be locked down in preparation for this vaccine.
	And the psychological preparation is that you have to do X that's not going to save you.
	But that's going to save other people.
	Your mask isn't going to protect you.
	It'll protect other people.
	Your vaccine's not going to protect you.
	It'll protect other people.
	And the government, it kept saying, can force you to do it.
	Because just like a seatbelt, they can tell you you've got to wear a seatbelt.
	I said, so, seatbelt saves me and not the other person in the other car?
	It's insane.
	But that was the insanity they were running through.
	But Susan Monterey, the new Trump CDC person, has been involved in AI and BARDA.
	And ARPA-H and all of these things.
	So that's, you know, they're going to extend this into their pseudoscience.
	Well, I said before, we can't trust chat GPT because it has actual biases built into it.
	But beyond that, they just had some individuals at Cambridge University said they put popular chat GPT-AI bot to the test and it failed.
	It lied to them.
	And then when they called it out, it actually confessed that it lied.
	He said, ChatGPT makes stuff up.
	This is a university lecturer at Cambridge.
	They had a bunch of people who were virologists who also know how to make stuff up.
	A bunch of these virologists say to the chat program, say, give us a list.
	Diseases that are eponymous, right?
	In other words, they're named after an individual.
	Here's some examples.
	Alzheimer's, named after a German psychiatrist.
	Down's syndrome, named after a British physician.
	Bell's palsy, after a Scottish surgeon, and so forth.
	He said there's a lot of them.
	So he said, give us a list of these things.
	And he said, I came back with a lot of them.
	These are people who study diseases and know the names.
	And all the codes historical from the Waterloo and order categorical.
	Anyway, they are the very model of a modern major virologist.
	And they said, well, there's a bunch of these things.
	I haven't heard of this.
	Have you heard of that disease?
	No. So they look at it.
	Then they researched it.
	And they said, it just made it up.
	He said, AI confabulates.
	It makes stuff up.
	It's part and parcel of how it works.
	This is what makes it interesting when you have it doing artwork.
	For artwork, it's kind of, well, that's kind of interesting.
	That's an interesting combination.
	It's kind of like a 1970s musician on drugs.
	I don't think a person with a functional mind would have done something like that.
	So it comes up with interesting things.
	The guy says, I've seen it for myself.
	It's very concerning.
	And you can see this won't end well.
	And so what he does is he confronts the AI with it.
	So we asked it to list these names.
	It came up with some stuff that didn't exist.
	And he said, so then we asked ChatGPT why it had done it.
	And it said, you're right.
	They don't exist.
	I shouldn't have done that, should I?
	Isn't that a refreshing change from a politician?
	Have you ever heard a politician say, you're right, that's wrong.
	I shouldn't have done that.
	I'm sorry.
	No, none of them will ever say that.
	RFK Jr. is a good example of that.
	They're all examples of that.
	They will never apologize for anything they did.
	They'll never say they were wrong.
	They'll never say, I shouldn't have done that, should I?
	So he says it was very strange.
	Not used to seeing apologies from anybody that they did or anything.
	So it lies.
	It lies.
	It's part and parcel.
	It's ingrained.
	Some lies are programmed into it.
	Some lies just flow out of it in the way that it operates.
	Yes.
	Who is the father of lies, according to Jesus?
	Who is the father of AI?
	That's what you need to think about.
	Just a little syllogism that's right there.
	He says, of course, it's going to make up stuff that's going to harm people's reputation.
	We've already seen that happen.
	Jonathan Turley.
	Remember that?
	He said, yeah.
	He was accused of sexual assault or something like that with a student on a trip.
	That he took a bunch of students to Alaska or something like that.
	And he says, well, first of all, I've never been there.
	Secondly, this is all made up.
	There's no such student.
	There's no such trip.
	All this stuff is made up.
	Made up a whole bunch of stuff about him.
	And it's done that to a lot of other people.
	So he said there's now a whole industry that is creating content online using these AI programs.
	Now, I've talked about this in the past, that when you start to use synthetic data, From artificial intelligence.
	Instead of authentic human data, the stuff that it copies and churns out, that you've had several different researchers say that as you start to do this iteratively in the research that they did, they said it's kind of like mad cow disease or Yaakov Creutzfeldt, where you're cannibalizing your own kind.
	And when it starts to consume AI information to a significant extent, It starts to get stupid and dumbed down, just like a mad cow or a mad human or something like that.
	But he's looking at this from something that is slightly different.
	He says, so what if they're churning out all this stuff?
	What if there's, you know, AI says this about Jonathan Turley that's not true, and some other AI picks it up and repeats it, and some humans pick it up and repeat it, and all of a sudden now this becomes something that people think is true.
	And that is a real danger.
	He says, if these systems are confabulating like this, then we are slowly polluting the knowledge base with rubbish.
	It'll accumulate into the future, making it harder to fact check.
	Well, maybe we'll have to stop trusting the internet.
	Trusting AI, that would be a good thing.
	Yeah, you're not going to need me.
	You'll have artificial intelligence.
	And you, most importantly, you don't need your critical thinking.
	Now, don't you try this at home.
	I mean, Fauci knows, and he is going to move that expert knowledge into artificial intelligence, and so don't question your masters.
	When people go online to check something, they'll find loads of references suggesting it's true, when in fact it was just dreamt up by AI, repeated by AI and humans.
	Well, in China, as the lockdown happened, They decided, because it's a centrally controlled economy, they had malinvested into real estate, famously.
	You can go on YouTube and you can look at some of the videos of massive homes that were built out in the middle of nowhere.
	Nobody ever bought them.
	Couldn't afford to buy them.
	And now they're being overgrown with weeds.
	There's one channel where that's basically what they do, is just go around and look at these mansions that are extremely...
	Expensive and ornate and large tracts of land.
	And there's nobody there except for one or two people that will go around occasionally and check on things.
	And so they have to keep an eye out for them and look out for them.
	So they got one guy running a drone that gives them an aerial view and a heads up and that type of stuff.
	But they famously overbuilt the real estate market.
	And that started to crash.
	So they decided, oh, the next big thing is going to be AI data centers.
	So they overbuilt them as well.
	China's AI boom hopes are crashing.
	More than 80% of the newly built AI data centers remain unused.
	This is from the expose.
	Post-pandemic, China invested heavily in artificial intelligence infrastructure, building hundreds of data centers to capitalize on the AI boom, but many of these facilities now stand unused due to weak demand and a shift in AI trends driven by DeepSeek.
	What is that trend?
	Well, that's to say that we don't need to have as many of these GPUs, and we don't need to have these big data centers.
	And yet, Elon Musk is going to be building millions of GPUs.
	That's his goal there in Memphis.
	Donald Trump, who wants to also centrally plan our economy, thinks that this is the wave of the future, and they need to help them in every way they can and prefer them.
	This is the problem.
	Central planning, whether it's done by Chinese communists or whether it's done by Trump Republicans, It's not a good idea.
	They don't know what the market needs.
	And even in communist China, marketplace and reality eventually wins out over central planning, and that's what we see happening here.
	And that's a good thing.
	That should give us confidence about this, that eventually it'll all get straight, but these people can create a lot of malinvestment and a lot of misery in the meantime.
	So the post-pandemic economic turndown and the slump in real estate sector led Chinese officials to scramble for an alternative growth drivers.
	And so the central planners rushed to build AI data centers from the top down, but there was no actual demand.
	There was no technical feasibility.
	And the projects were led by executives and investors with limited experience in AI infrastructure.
	Basically, nobody's got any expertise in this.
	It's just the next big thing.
	And everybody needs to do it.
	Isn't this...
	Invest in tulip bulbs.
	Buy, buy, buy.
	Yeah, or the big company, the East India company.
	The demand for NVIDIA graphics processing units, the GPUs, was extremely high at one point.
	Prices got up to $28,000 on the black market, and they had to have them on the black market in China.
	Why? Because the U.S. put export controls on it.
	So the Chinese got it.
	It was a little bit more expensive, but they were still able to get it.
	Prices have since decreased, and many traders are now selling off their surplus GPUs due to poor returns.
	Renting out GPUs to companies that need them for training AI models is the main business model for the new wave of data centers.
	In other words, they're looking at it kind of like the crypto mining.
	This is something that's going to go on for quite some time, actually, until the government bans it, because that's what happened in China.
	Big crypto mining facilities and the government just comes in and arbitrarily shuts them down.
	And then they move to other places.
	But that was what these people were doing.
	They didn't know or care anything about AI.
	They just wanted to grab the hardware, put it together, find some power, sell it to people.
	So they had hundreds of data AI centers.
	Resulted in many of these centers standing unused.
	Only about 10% of the companies still actively investing.
	By the end of 2024.
	Some brokers are not looking to make money from the data centers in the first place.
	What they were really looking at was exploiting government benefits.
	They were going to get subsidized green electricity.
	They were going to get state-backed loans and credits and things like that.
	And that's what we see with the green agenda.
	We see people, they don't care about any of this stuff.
	They just want the government subsidies and the government loans and the government benefits and the rest of this stuff.
	That's what central planning always does.
	Now, the interesting thing in this is that Trump is saying that, well, we will cut off some of these tariffs to China if you let some of my buddies buy ByteDance from you, you know, for TikTok.
	Well, ByteDance and Alibaba are still putting a lot of money into AI.
	Alibaba is going to invest $50 billion over the next three years.
	ByteDance is going to invest about $20 billion.
	It doesn't sound like they're interested in selling.
	So one data center project manager of this base there said, everybody I met is leveraging the data center deal for something else that the government can offer.
	They don't care even about buying these things and renting them out.
	It's because, hey, I want a government loan, or I want to subsidize this or that.
	And that's what happens when you centrally plan the economy.
	And we've seen this over and over again with the Green New Deal and the electric school buses and Solyndra and all the rest of these things.
	They pump all this money into them and then they crash.
	But these people still make money.
	Now with Trump, the pump and dump is going to be in cryptos and stablecoins and things like that.
	The technocrats are sparking a global war over crypto supremacy.
	This is by Patrick Wood at Technocracy News.
	He says, cash is being driven out of circulation worldwide.
	Governments and technocrats are jockeying to come up on top of a global payment system that controls all trade and all populations.
	Because cash provides anonymity, global crypto payment systems are there to destroy privacy altogether.
	Yeah, penny saved is a penny earned.
	Well, you know, Trump is getting rid of the penny, getting rid of his first step.
	To get rid of cash, I believe.
	I said that from the very beginning.
	Make cash more expensive, more difficult to use, that type of thing.
	No, actually, it's a penny for your thoughts is really what they want.
	They want to get rid of physical coin, physical money, because they want to know your thoughts, your actions.
	They want to follow everything that you're doing.
	By the way, mentioning that...
	Made me think of the ad.
	We have sold out of the coins.
	Sad to see that happen.
	I like that ad, and I like the coins, too.
	They were very popular.
	Everybody seemed to like them.
	We did not take it down off the website.
	We just put...
	Sold out, out of stock or whatever.
	And because we didn't want people going nuts trying to find it on the website and wasting time and then writing and saying, I can't find where to buy these things.
	So they have sold out.
	And I want to thank Ryan for that.
	He did a great job with that.
	And the timing was really good because things have been down this month, but that helped significantly.
	And it sold.
	Fantastically. So it was one of the best-selling things we had.
	Unfortunately, there was only 100 of them, and once they're gone, they're gone, as we said.
	I'm going to play that commercial one more time right after this, because I do like that commercial as well.
	It's a coin.
	Technocrats had a plan for scientific dictatorship going back to the early 1930s.
	Now that the technocrats have taken over the U.S. government with Trump there, they've co-opted Trump in the same way that the Trilateral Commission consumed the Carter administration.
	Yeah, who was that?
	That was Zbigniew Brzezinski.
	That was Zbigniew Brzezinski who put together the Trilateral Commission, and it was Zbigniew Brzezinski who ran the Carter administration, and it was Zbigniew Brzezinski who, in his book, Between Two Ages, talked about the coming Technocratic Age.
	Yeah, any other name?
	You know, Technocracy, Technate, Technocratic, you know, these are, of course, Technate is a...
	The actual entity, you know, from Central America on up to Greenland, that type of thing, you know, creating a unit of government.
	But nevertheless, all of this stuff is the same thing.
	What's the big new Brzezinski was saying?
	We will know before you know what you're going to do.
	This is early 1970s.
	They liked that.
	They created the Trilateral Commission to create global governance.
	They got him to control Carter.
	And now that's being done.
	Patrick Wood is right.
	That's exactly what's being done with Trump.
	So don't think the Trilateral Commission is old school.
	Don't think it's impotent or out of business.
	By the way, Mika Brzezinski, his daughter, is still there deceiving people.
	They're circling like buzzards to make sure their technocratic plans are successful.
	The unelected premier in Canada, for example, Mark Carney, is a member of the Trilateral Commission, widely acknowledged as a technocrat.
	And this is interesting to think about this.
	You know, it's like, yeah, I've seen him.
	He's been the head of the Bank of England.
	He's been the head of the Bank of Canada.
	Kind of unusual to have, this guy is deeply loved by these people.
	He's a Canadian who's had the Canadian Central Bank.
	They made him head of the Bank of England.
	First time that had ever happened.
	Only time.
	But he's never been elected to anything.
	Never been elected to any office.
	Dog catcher, nothing.
	He's now the prime minister, but he wasn't elected.
	How about that?
	They installed him.
	You know, we go through all the charade and all the expense because it's the way that they launder the money to the politicians when they have elections.
	It's a way of money laundering to these people and paying them off, but that's how they pay their salary, you know.
	But we don't have elections either.
	We also have people who are installed.
	And so he said, when you start to look at what these people want, When you look at the technocracy and its requirements, providing a continuous inventory of all production and consumption, and we've seen this with just-in-time supply chain management and that type of stuff, or to provide a specific registration of the type and kind of all goods and services, where they're produced, where they're used.
	This kind of efficiency can lead to tyranny, but it is also one of their weak points.
	We've talked, and as a matter of fact, coming up today, we're going to have Jack Lawson join us again.
	His book has been out of print for four months, but it's now back in stock.
	He's got a massive stock.
	And as the people who were handling the printing and the order fulfillment messed up, Royally.
	So he's going to be handling that all himself.
	As a matter of fact, he sent out this...
	Oh, we have the other picture that...
	Where's the other picture that I sent you of his inventory?
	In his garage.
	He's got pallet after...
	There we go.
	Pallet after pallet of the stuff.
	And he says, ignore my messy garage.
	He said, you know yours is just as bad.
	I think it looks actually pretty organized there.
	And he's got a massive quantity of these now.
	And he's got a new website.
	And he's got other books that he's written.
	Because he's had a very, very interesting life as a foreign soldier and a mercenary.
	But we'll be talking to him coming up.
	The reason I mention that is because from the very first time I talked to him, he was talking about the vulnerability of supply chains.
	And that was before everything got locked down by Trump in his first administration.
	And we saw what happened with all of that.
	And so, although this gives them great control and great efficiency, as the complexity is added to things like that, it becomes increasingly easy to break these.
	This is why we should not fear.
	First of all, we shouldn't fear because we have a relationship with God.
	And if you don't have a relationship with God, that's what you should be afraid of.
	But if we have a relationship with God, we're not worried about any of this stuff.
	Number one, we know He's in control.
	Number two, we know that as tight as their control appears to be, and as complicated as all their stuff appears to be, it can be kind of like a Rube Goldberg machine.
	All you've got to do is go in there and click one thing like that, and it breaks.
	And believe me, there are going to be people who know how this thing works, and they will do that.
	They will do that.
	So, the great enabler of all this stuff is the Internet of Things, and of course, you will be part of the Internet of Things.
	They even call that the Internet of Bodies, just to be clear.
	Former head of the FCC praised 5G and the Internet of Things in 2017.
	Tom Wheeler said, if something can be connected, it will be connected.
	Well, all of that data, this is why 5G was so essential.
	It's why Trump was pushing it so hard in his first administration, and why they were so concerned that Huawei might have 5G chips there, because they don't want China getting that data.
	They want it for themselves.
	You see, that's the unspoken thing.
	If they're so concerned about TikTok, you should be concerned about that.
	You shouldn't want it to exist, and you shouldn't want to use it.
	Because is it going to be used by China to look at you, or is it going to be used by the American government to look at you?
	Now, when China uses it and looks at your data, they're looking at it as part of an aggregate system.
	To work against the United States.
	But when the United States government uses that, they're looking at that specifically to come after you.
	You specifically.
	So it's actually the more dangerous thing is for the government to have it, our government.
	And to provide specific registration of the consumption of each individual, record a description of the individual.
	This is why they need to put everything on the blockchain.
	He says, forget about communism, socialism, and Marxism.
	They have served their purpose to destroy the fabric of society, and they are now being cast aside.
	It's now safe for Elon Musk to reject all of the things that he always embraced, the DEI, the Marxism, and everything else.
	Cast that aside.
	Because now we're going on to the next big thing.
	And we can see how that works in the UK.
	Permanent facial recognition cameras going up in London.
	And you have some people there that are worried about it, but a lot of people there are applauding it.
	Why? Because they have created a government problem, and then they offer you a government solution.
	Crime is rampant in this area of London, in Croydon.
	And so in that area of London...
	They're putting these things up permanently.
	They've been driving these facial recognition cameras.
	They put them in vans and they drive them around as part of their test, really.
	And so it's kind of hit or miss.
	You know, we drive around and hoping that they can spot somebody that's in their database and flag them and arrest them.
	I don't think that's really what it's about.
	I think it's just conditioning.
	I think it's about boiling the frogs, getting people used to that.
	But now in Croydon, this is the first time they put them up permanently, fixed.
	All the time.
	And so they said this permanent facial recognition is placed to scan faces and to match them into a criminal database.
	So what we do is we open the borders.
	We have lax law enforcement.
	We don't come after people who are violent criminals.
	We come after people who are silently praying in their mind in front of an abortion clinic.
	That's what they do in the UK.
	And then as crime goes out of control, catch and release.
	For migrants catching release for criminals.
	Then they come in with their solution, which is Big Brother.
	Because there's relief with the residents and the shoppers who hope the cameras will help to bring down the rate of crime that's keeping them up at night.
	Just last year, Corden was named as the violent hotspot of London with more than 10,000 violent crimes recorded in a single 12-month period.
	One person, 60 years old.
	So she's lived in the borough for 17 years.
	She's relieved that more is being done to make the area safe once again.
	She said, every day I pray my grandchildren come home safe.
	Crime is out of control.
	We saw what happened to this one lady, and she was just an innocent girl.
	She said, I've seen young people stabbing each other as well.
	Well, do you think the cameras are going to help?
	No, the camera's not going to help.
	God has been removed out of this area.
	And if you have godless societies and people don't want to, don't have any respect for each other, cameras and cops are not going to change this.
	As a matter of fact, it will likely only get worse.
	Are these cameras going to be the saving grace of London's most crime-riddled areas?
	Don't hold your breath, says Big Brother Watch.
	They frequently visit Croydon to watch how police were using the technology, and they said what they saw was not a sign of good things to come.
	Madeline Stone, senior advocacy officer there at Big Brother Watch, said she saw a pregnant woman being held up against a wall after being falsely flagged by facial recognition.
	You're going to wind up with people that get swatted, and that's what they've done, all the different false arrests that they've had, the errors that they've had.
	What you're going to wind up with is yet another gang, and this will be a government gang.
	The police have essentially been left off the leash and they can do whatever they want.
	Everyone gets something wrong sometimes, but what happens when the algorithm gets it wrong?
	Who is responsible then?
	Oh, I'm not responsible.
	In May, a legal challenge was launched against the police after an anti-knife crime community worker was wrongly flagged and detained by police following misidentification.
	See, AI makes stuff up.
	And if this person was somebody who was working against knife crime, somebody in the community working against knife crime, and at some point associates him with knife crime, and then flags him for the police, even though he's exactly the opposite of that.
	Sean Thompson, wrongly flagged as a wanted person on the Met Police facial recognition database.
	Outside of London Bridge Station.
	He was held by officers for almost 30 minutes who repeatedly demanded scans of his fingerprints and threatened him with arrest, despite him showing multiple identity documents, further evidencing that he was not the individual on the facial recognition database.
	This has happened in the U.S. as well.
	And so they are going to look at this and say, yeah, but the system says.
	You see?
	It's that deference to AI as being the authority.
	That's what Gates was talking about.
	He thinks it's a good thing.
	I think it's a very dangerous thing.
	Yeah, but the system has pointed you out.
	I don't care what your ID says, and I don't care what I see.
	The system has flagged you for this stuff.
	So they said, we are the first democratic country in the UK, in the world, to do this.
	It is a dark path that we're going down.
	And we're going to become a surveillance state.
	They're already mostly there.
	Just like Aaron Day says, hey, you've already got digital cash, centralized surveillance, and all the rest of this.
	For residents, their priority, however, is not to protect their privacy.
	They just want crime to go down.
	Again, government creates a problem.
	Government offers you their preferred solution, which, by the way, will not solve the problem.
	Shannon Kerwin, 20 years old, says she welcomes a crime reduction after seeing so many youths go for each other.
	She said, I've sat in this food van where she works, and I've seen gangs just pull out weapons on each other right in front of me.
	Oh, well, get ready for the SWAT teams to pull out weapons against you and other people as well.
	Get SWATed by the AI, and then try to convince these people that it is not the real thing.
	So, again, there'll be a new gang in town, the Face Recog Gang.
	That's what they should call the cops.
	Face recogs.
	All the ones who are committing crimes, however, are wearing balaclavas and face coverings.
	So is there any point to the camera if they can't see through that?
	Even she sees through that.
	And, okay, so we'll find some other way to do this.
	Maybe we'll even be able to reconstruct their contour or something.
	Well, whatever they use.
	A professional criminal is going to go around.
	It's the same argument about gun control, right?
	Face control, gun control, all the same type of thing.
	The professional criminals, the people who have planned this out, it's not going to stop them at all.
	Another person said, well, I think it's a good thing.
	If you haven't done anything wrong, then you don't need to be worried.
	That fatal idea.
	Well, I'll say one last thing.
	Yeah, one last thing.
	Netflix. And people have talked about this film, Adolescence, on Netflix in a lot of different ways, being used in the UK by the Prime Minister.
	He's actually discussing it and its themes in Parliament.
	And so these people are saying, wait a minute, this looks kind of suspicious.
	They're using this film to push an agenda.
	And they're ignoring a lot of other aspects of this agenda.
	I wonder if they had anything to do with the production of this film, even to that extent.
	As a matter of fact, they just had a horrendous crime that was conducted by a young migrant, and they're completely ignoring that in the government and the government media, pretty much ignoring that case, as heinous as it was.
	A young African boy who attacked a group of kids, cut off the heads of toddlers.
	This guy is literally demonic when you look at his face.
	But they forget about that.
	And what they did was they concocted a story where they could demonize what they call the manosphere, demonize sexist social media influencers.
	In this story of teens, a 13-year-old boy, he's driven to murder because he is publicly humiliated online.
	When he is labeled a forever incel, in other words, involuntarily celibate, by a girl who rejected his advances.
	And so in his rage and hurt, he stabs her to death.
	And so the politicians are saying, well, we've got to do something to stop toxic online influencers.
	We've got to do something to stop people from having access to the Internet.
	So we have to have these kids have to have ID.
	That's what they want.
	They want ID for everybody.
	MPs have already praised the film for, quote, forcing a national conversation about the dangerous content seen by the young men and boys with fatal consequences.
	One person asked during questions of the Prime Minister, will the Prime Minister back campaign to counter toxic misogyny early and give young men the role models that they deserve?
	Let's have some films about beta males.
	We've had a lot of films about beta males, haven't we?
	And strong women.
	All these superheroes who are women.
	A British Christian comedian, Alistair Williams, pointed out that violence stems not from any influencer or from animus against a particular group of people, but from an abandonment of God's morality.
	Yeah, God has been pushed out of the UK and society for the most part, and this is what you're going to wind up with.
	He says it's the lack of the presence of God in any shared morality that is the reason for murder, violence, you name it.
	It's not Andrew Tate even or a lack of social media control.
	Yeah, these things fill a godless vacuum in a society and a godless vacuum in individual people.
	The film's co-creator, Jack Thorne, though, is making the rounds on British media, calling for the government to implement a digital age of consent.
	And there's a couple of problems with that that are pretty obvious.
	As LifeSite News, which has this article, says, well, there's evidence of trafficking and pornography and all that.
	If they're not going to talk about that aspect of all of this stuff, they're not going to talk about human trafficking and prostitution and things like that that are happening.
	Why are they ignoring that?
	And the other aspect which they don't talk about at LifeSite News is, and if they're going to ignore the age of consent for mutilating yourself and sterilizing yourself with all this trans nonsense,
	if they're going to ignore that, if they're going to ignore human trafficking and the rest of this, if they're going to ignore the open borders, If they're going to ignore the crimes that are being committed by people coming in to the country, that's one of the reasons why the violence is going up.
	It's a demographic shift.
	You can't talk about that.
	You can't talk about that in Ireland.
	Or they come after you.
	And so there's all these things that they're not looking at.
	And they focus on one thing because what they want, really, is the digital ID.
	And that's why they're talking about an age of consent.
	Not an age of consent.
	They'll go to toddlers.
	And they'll groom the toddlers.
	To have this pretense that they are a different gender, so they can sterilize them, so they can mutilate them.
	But they are not going to talk about that with this.
	The film itself, perhaps, was created to serve a predetermined political agenda, of course.
	In this article, they point out the forerunner of the CIA, the OSS, which was there in 1943.
	It was part of World War II.
	You had Obama's grandparents were...
	Members of the OSS, founding members of the CIA, the rest of it.
	His mother worked for USAID, CIA, all of it.
	But the Office of Strategic Services, OSS, in 1943 had a memo praising film as, quote, one of the most powerful propaganda weapons at the disposal of the United States.
	And, of course, it was.
	As I said many times, newspapers were propaganda weapons.
	Radio became a more effective one.
	Film became even more effective, and now they've got social media and the internet, the most effective of all, especially because it's got a built-in measurement in it as to whether or not you agree with them.
	They also quote the former director of the U.S. Office of War Information, Elmer Davis, who said, the easiest way to inject a propaganda idea into most people's minds is to let it go through the medium of an entertainment picture when they don't realize that they're being propagandized.
	That's coming from the You know, it's kind of interesting, isn't it, that all this UFO nonsense and disclosure stuff is coming from so many people in the Pentagon.
	Do you trust it then?
	To me, that's an immediate red flag.
	And I have reported in the past about how both the CIA and the Pentagon will offer scenarios out there, especially the CIA, offer very interesting scenarios for Hollywood writers.
	They say, hey, contact us.
	We've got some great scripts that are written.
	This is where we get all this predictive programming.
	We've got some great ideas.
	We'll be happy to share them with you because they want to use the films to predictively program people for stuff.
	And so they've got some that they'll use and they will even write some and they'll add additional stuff into your existing script.
	And then this came out, which I thought was really interesting.
	I had not noticed this at all.
	The CEO, the co-founder, and the first CEO of Netflix was the grand-nephew of Edward Bernays, the massive propagandist, the guy who lied us into World War I for Woodrow Wilson, the guy who then had a very lucrative career on Madison Avenue.
	Lying to us about all kinds of things.
	He marketed cigarettes to women.
	He helped to convince Americans about water fluoridation that it was safe.
	And by the way, they don't mention it in this, but just look at Dr. Strangelove.
	One of the most effective pro-water fluoridation messages out there anywhere.
	This lunatic at the heart of it, Jack D. Ripper or whatever, General Jack D. Ripper.
	You know, talking about going crazy.
	They're corrupting our bodily fluids.
	Oh, well, if you don't like fluoride, you must be like that lunatic, right?
	You use the movies to plant that idea in people's heads.
	So, yeah.
	Edward Bernays is going to make the world safe for democracy by getting us involved in World War I. And he had this interesting quote.
	Edward Bernays...
	He said that he was one of the true ruling powers in the U.S. You know, we've had this type of stuff said by Karl Rove.
	He said, we are history's actors.
	You're just observers.
	As we act, you'll observe and you'll comment and so forth.
	And we'll be on with our next thing doing it.
	This is the arrogance they have.
	He said, the conscious and intelligent manipulation, this is Edward Bernays, of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in a democratic society.
	Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government, which is the true ruling power of our country.
	We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes are formed, and our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.
	It is they who pull the wires that control the public mind.
	People like him.
	People like Edward Bernays.
	People like his grandnephew, who was the co-founder and the first CEO of Netflix.
	And they have really pushed the envelope.
	You would always have these arguments about, well, is Hollywood reflecting society or pushing it?
	It's pushing it.
	It's pushing it.
	We can see that in retrospect.
	So, seen as a propaganda piece, this movie, Adolescents.
	Already appears to be very effective.
	One English teacher recently remarked on X that, quote, Adolescence on Netflix has convinced me that children should not be legally allowed to have smartphones and that one day we will look back on the fact that we allowed it and be really ashamed.
	And over a thousand people liked her comment.
	Well, many people agree that children should not have smartphones.
	Keep them away for a number of reasons.
	The radiation of your smartphone, what it does to them.
	Mentally, socially, all the rest of these things.
	Yes, you should keep kids away from smartphones.
	Hear that, Travis?
	And you should definitely keep them.
	But that's a parent's job.
	It's not the job of the government.
	And as the government in Florida, the Republicans in Florida, did this same thing.
	So it's not the UK, and it's not the liberals.
	It's also the U.S., and it's the conservatives doing the same thing.
	And when this happened in Florida, You had a lot of people who were parents who were surveyed by Fox News that said, we don't like the government being involved in this.
	We want to handle this ourselves.
	We don't want our kids on the internet, but we need to be able to handle it ourselves.
	But this is all about requiring online ID.
	Just like when Trump...
	I just said, well, we're going to...
	He talked about all the different things that are wrong with our election.
	He didn't talk about all the things that are wrong with our election.
	He didn't talk about the fact that we have a two-party system that is in complete control of the ballot, of the debates, and other things like that.
	He didn't talk about getting rid of vote-by-mail.
	He did talk about having the election on one day and having paper ballots and having ID on people.
	But guess what?
	Of all the things that are wrong with our elections, the only thing he focused on was...
	You got it.
	ID. ID.
	Any government that makes a fuss over misogynistic influencer content without making a serious effort to combat sex trafficking and violent pornography has suspect motives.
	Or, if they want to talk about that and they want to talk about an age of consent and they don't want to talk about what is going on with the transitioning of minors, They have suspect motives.
	And we know we have more than a suspicion about that.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we're going to come back.
	I've gone a bit long on this segment.
	And as I said before, we have now sold out of the coins, but I enjoy this ad, so...
	I thought it was a great job.
	That's a great coin, and I really want to thank Ryan for the love of the road for doing that.
	And while you can't get the coin, there are still other things, like shirts and hoodies you can buy on thedavidknightshow.com.
	And we will have those ads coming up, too, as well.
	But I'm going to play the ad for the thing that you can't get, and I'm sure the 100 people who got it, they're going to be very happy with it.
	Thank you.
	A penny saved is a penny earned.
	Though, that's gotten tougher since they've stopped making them.
	Maybe it's time to start saving a different type of coin.
	Such as the new David Knight Show supporter commemorative coin.
	Saving these coins earns support for independent media.
	Featuring striking bas-relief with bold raised details and premium painted accents.
	It's not just a trinket, but a statement, a declaration.
	A way to show you refuse to be controlled by the establishment.
	It's a limited run of just 100 coins.
	So, much like the penny, when they're gone, they're gone.
	They silence independent voices.
	They censor the truth.
	But you can stand with real journalism and own a piece of the resistance.
	These coins saved is The David Knight Show sustained.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Show.
	Well, this is an interesting article from Free Thought Project.
	Actually, it's from Common Dreams as well.
	And we need to think about this.
	A lot of what Trump is doing, of course, is clickbait.
	Authoritarian clickbait.
	And it is to distract you from what is really going on, which is a corporate power grab.
	That is what the Trump administration is really about, folks.
	You will click the links.
	You will take the bait.
	That's right.
	Yeah, we'll talk about what's happening with this stuff here.
	But Trump's political theater, they said, is quietly engineering the most aggressive transfer of public wealth to private interests in modern American history.
	Trump's political style isn't about suppressing attention.
	It's about seizing attention.
	Were they threatening to annex Greenland one way or the other?
	We're mocking Canada as the 51st state.
	We're pressuring Columbia University to abandon free speech protections.
	The goal is not to avoid controversy.
	The aim is to create controversy.
	In a world that is governed by algorithms, viral tweets, and information overload, authoritarianism no longer seeks silence.
	It seeks spectacle.
	Trump's provocations are not mere outbursts.
	They are designed and they are timed to dominate headlines, to crowd out serious scrutiny, and to keep the public in a state of reactive agitation.
	So here's the next thing.
	Oh, you just reacted.
	Here's another one that's coming out there.
	It says the provocation is the point.
	His administration has leaned into fascist-style imagery with symbolic salutes.
	Is that intentional or not?
	The Elon Musk Nazi salute?
	His administration has leaned into those kind of symbolic salutes with rallies that were drenched in nationalism, with open threats against political dissonance, both foreign and domestic, and against his political enemies.
	It's authoritarianism repurposed for an attention economy, where outrage drives clicks, and distraction enables deeper, quieter abuses of power.
	Trump seems to invite public attention by his most outrageous behavior, not in spite of its controversy, but precisely because of it.
	And while Americans are arguing over whether Trump's statements are ironic, dangerous, or just trolling, his administration is quietly enacting policies that concentrate wealth and corporate power behind the scenes.
	I would just say, though, that some of these issues, in other words, there's attacks on free speech and some of these other things, are really substantive issues.
	And they really are authoritarian.
	And they really must be exposed and opposed.
	But I think a good example of this are the tariffs on the economic side.
	An excellent example of this.
	Because the tariffs are on again, they're off again, they're off again, they're off again, they're on again.
	And that is designed to keep people On edge and distracted and what is going on and all the people who are involved in the economy, people who are making investments, the investors and everybody else is looking at that.
	And while that is happening, what's he doing?
	He's putting in his private version of Central Bank Digital Currency, a PPP, Public-Private Partnership for Digital Currency.
	It's a perfect example of it, and I think that's the best example of it.
	I believe that all this tariff vacillation, all this tariff chaos is designed to direct people who pay attention to financial issues to redirect them from what is really happening.
	A dystopian, big brother, great reset, great taking.
	That is really what is happening with all of this stuff.
	He says the tax policy, one of the clearest examples, a tax law passed during Trump's first term overwhelmingly favored the wealthy while doing very little to stimulate broad-based economic growth.
	But now he's doubled down.
	His 2025 budget proposal is slashing funding for housing, food assistance, and health care.
	Meanwhile, Trump and Elon Musk gleefully proclaimed they're slashing government waste in the name of efficiency.
	Yet remain conspicuously silent on the bloated corporate excesses of defense spending, for example.
	Where billions vanish into unaccountable contracts, overpriced weapons, and Pentagon boondoggles that are cloaked in patriotic branding.
	Elon Musk is first and foremost a military contractor.
	Notice how he has not looked at any of the waste in these military issues here.
	Energy policy, same thing.
	He says, well, the administration is railing against international climate accords and environmental wokeness that is quietly threatening to sell off public lands.
	And that's not an environmental issue.
	He says, oh, yeah, and fossil fuel industry.
	So this guy is coming at it from being a true believer that anybody uses the term fossil fuel.
	has bought into that CIA nonsense of peak oil and all the rest of it.
	They probably have bought into all the climate change nonsense.
	But it's not about that.
	I disagree with that.
	But the beneficiaries of all this stuff are going to be the multinational corporations and their wealthy shareholders.
	They're going to be the ones who are going to benefit from the selling off of assets done by Doug Burgum, Scott Besson, the Treasury Secretary, Howard Lucky Lutnik.
	It's going to be the crony buddies that are going to be benefiting from all of this stuff.
	No doubt about it.
	So, when we look at what is happening with the news and with the money, let's just go to the money next.
	Crypto Fund Manager says, this is the single largest arbitrage in human history.
	Yeah, we're talking about the stablecoins, is what he is talking about.
	And understand that when we talk about this, what we're talking about fundamentally is tokenization, securitization, derivatives, things like ETFs, all of this stuff.
	And if you go down this road, you're ripe for the taking.
	And they can't wait.
	Speaking of stablecoins and the ability to use them for payments, what's your take there?
	Yeah, look, people...
	I think if you go, there's 8 billion people on the planet.
	If you could go to each of those 8 billion people and ask them, you know, hey, you can denominate your wealth in any asset, gold, Apple stock, S&P 500, euros, you know, yen, whatever you want.
	My suspicion is if you went and asked everyone in the world and they could answer the question without fear of political persecution, I suspect 5 to 7 billion of them would say U.S. dollars.
	And so it's like probably like, The single largest arbitrage ever in human history is to just get those people what they want.
	If you think that's what they want, then give it to them.
	And crypto rails are going to be the mechanism by which you do so.
	And so I think there's a massive opportunity to get stablecoins in the hands of billions of people.
	A massive arbitrage.
	In other words, he's looking at making a lot of money.
	You do an arbitrage, if you can find something that's being sold in China very cheaply, and then you can turn around and sell it on Amazon.
	That's one simple arbitrage that's right there.
	He's looking at being able to make massive amounts of money off of this.
	Eight billion people on the planet.
	You ask them, what do you want to denominate your wealth in?
	You want it in Apple stock or S&P 500, Euros, Yen, whatever, gold, any of this stuff?
	Oh, I think most people would want dollars.
	You think so?
	I don't know.
	I guess I'm not like most people.
	I'd go for the gold.
	But the bottom line is, folks, if you take your wealth, and if you put it in Apple stock, what would they do?
	They'd set up some kind of a derivative.
	Some kind of an ETF, right?
	It's not good enough just to own the Apple stock.
	No, no, no.
	BlackRock and these other people are going to repackage it for you, just like they repackaged real estate.
	And sell you fractional parts of it, just like they repackaged supposedly physical gold, which they don't own for the most part.
	But, you know, we're going to tell you that we got gold.
	We're not going to say how much.
	You can't redeem these certificates for the gold, but we'll tell you that we got gold somewhere.
	Some amount of gold somewhere.
	And we'll sell you stuff at the price of a tenth of an ounce, except it doesn't track the price of gold because they don't have gold.
	Anyway, the ETFs, the derivatives, the tokenization, the securitization, these things are all opportunities for them to quote-unquote arbitrage.
	It allows them to interpose themselves.
	Even when you talk about, and like I said yesterday with Tony, the biggest red flag on all this stuff is the tokenization, the ETF of Bitcoin.
	Bitcoin is infinitely divisible, right?
	And you don't need to have an ETF on top of that.
	To me, that just reeked of exploitation and where this stuff is all going.
	And so whatever you choose to put your wealth in, if you choose then to get it in a token version or a securitized version or an ETF or a stable whatever, then you're choosing to let these people rip you off.
	I mean it.
	Accept no substitutes.
	Get the real stuff.
	If you want Bitcoin, get real Bitcoin.
	Don't get an ETF of it.
	If you want gold, get real gold.
	You can get it in small, fractional amounts as well.
	By the way, you can go to davidknight.gold to get you Tony Ardobin.
	Again, that's one of the places where I've seen the small, fractional gold.
	Gold that is less than a $3,000, almost $3,100.
	Less than a $3,100 coin.
	You can still get small, fractional amounts of coins.
	And I got familiarized with that as some people kindly put me into the Wolfpack thing and sent me some of that.
	And so I was like, oh, look at that.
	That's cool.
	I didn't know that existed before.
	And so, yeah, there's a lot of stuff that is there.
	But look, this is where these people are headed.
	It's all about ripping people off.
	Look, just understand, when I talk about a dollar-backed stablecoin and private crypto and all the rest of it, understand that the dollar is not stable, that digital currency is not a coin.
	Understand that crypto is not private and neither is...
	Some kind of private crypto is not private.
	You don't have privacy with that, okay?
	So they use these words.
	They call it stable.
	They call it a coin.
	They call it crypto.
	They call it private.
	They use all of these words to deceive you.
	It's none of these things.
	That ought to be a real warning.
	I'm trying to warn you.
	I tried to warn you about the vaccines and the lockdowns and the January 6th stuff, and I'm warning you about this.
	Crypto game that is out there as well.
	It's not stable.
	It's not a coin.
	It's not private.
	It's designed to do exactly the opposite of all of this stuff.
	So they said, nevertheless, in this article, they're pushing a zero hedge, says their use cases, stable coins, are vast and expanding.
	They enable fast, low-cost...
	Cross-border payments, bypassing the inefficiencies of traditional banking systems.
	They power decentralized finance platforms.
	They call that DeFi.
	And it defies any common sense.
	This is what Trump and Barron, Trump, all really want to get into.
	What they call the DeFi.
	Decentralized finance.
	Let me tell you that.
	It's not decentralized either.
	It's not stable.
	It's not a coin.
	It's not private.
	And it's not decentralized.
	Heavily controlled by the government.
	Know your customer laws, anti-money laundering laws, you name it.
	And these people exist.
	Do you think you or I could set up one of these things and get away with it?
	No. They exist because they work by, with, and for the government.
	That's why Lucky Lutnik weaseled his way into the Trump administration.
	He was already heavily involved in government.
	They were already one of the biggest buyers of treasury bills.
	That were out there.
	And this is one of the reasons why they're moving to the so-called dollar-denominated stablecoin, is because other countries are sick and tired of the fraud of the fiat currency here in America.
	We saw this happen after Bretton Woods II, where everybody said, well, you promised after World War I at Bretton Woods, you promised that you were going to have gold to back up your dollar.
	But you keep printing more and more dollars, and that's fraudulent.
	We're not going to go with this system anymore.
	Oh, wait, wait, I got something else, says Kissinger.
	We'll go with a petrodollar.
	Well, now that's basically been de-financed.
	Not DeFi, but it's been de-financed.
	And so they're going to come up with some other scheme.
	And because now you have the same situation, you've got a lot of different countries saying, I'm fed up with your system where you were weaponizing it, as Biden did, with sanctions and other things.
	I don't want to have anything to do with this system.
	It's a dishonest system.
	Oh, okay, well, we'll come up with...
	So we're not going to buy your treasury bills anymore.
	Okay, we'll set up this thing called stablecoins, and we'll sell our treasury bills to the stablecoins thing.
	It's all just redirection.
	As of March 24th, 2025...
	The U.S. dollar tether surpassed 75 billion.
	Sorry, USDT on Ethereum passed 75 billion.
	USDC is trailing just above 39 billion.
	And these people are looking at this as the biggest arbitrage they've ever had.
	The Trump administration, folks, is the biggest arbitrage these billionaires in Silicon Valley and in Wall Street have ever had.
	It's going to be a massive, massive transfer of wealth.
	You want to know how?
	You're going to wind up owning nothing?
	It'll be Trump.
	And everybody will say, oh, it's fine because it's him.
	On Rumble, DG8 says, David, every time Trump does something, he goes against MAGA, like endorsing Lindsey Graham, which he just did.
	They always have an excuse.
	He's just trolling.
	These people have no discernment.
	Did they elect a child?
	Yeah, they always say that.
	They made all these excuses for him in 2020.
	Well, he just had bad advisors.
	Who did he hit?
	Who is he?
	Didn't he hire the advisors?
	Didn't he hire the advisors who hired the advisors?
	Didn't he pay everybody?
	Didn't he sign his name to all of this stuff?
	No, he has no responsibility.
	But he will save us at the same time.
	This is the double think behind all of it.
	Well, the Mar-a-Laga Accord is bullish for gold, but not for the reasons that you might think.
	There's this article in Kitco.
	Some analysts say that Trump's global trade war is part of a broader framework to reorganize global financial and trading systems.
	And see, this trade war that's got everybody fighting and all of these, you know, this is to get your attention there, on the tariffs.
	They're on again, they're off again, they're doing this.
	Canada's a 51st state on it, so that he and his buddies can roll out these stablecoins and other things like that.
	The roadmap that Trump is following was laid out in November in a 41-page essay written by Stephen Myron, chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisors.
	Many have called this the Mar-a-Lago Accord, which envisions the U.S. dollar remaining unchallenged as the world's reserve currency, creating global economic stability, while staying undervalued to support domestic manufacturing and the economy.
	Moran also suggests that the U.S. government could sell its gold and use the proceeds to buy other currencies.
	Selling U.S. gold reserves would also impact the reserves of emerging market central banks, which have been accumulating gold at record rates over the last three years.
	Well, analysts had said it would be difficult for Trump to fulfill all these goals because they are running counter to each other.
	A lot of these are mutually exclusive.
	You do one at the expense of the other.
	For example, the Trump tariffs are expected to continue driving inflation higher, which will pressure the Federal Reserve to maintain its neutral monetary policy stance, keeping the dollar elevated.
	An analyst said that while the U.S. dollar might eventually weaken, it may take a sore economic growth or even an outright recession to achieve this outcome.
	This is why a lot of people are saying, well, we also think that Trump is trying to engineer us into a recession.
	But even at the prices that gold is at now, and it hit a new record yesterday and then retreated back a little bit, I think it got up to like 3,070 or something, fell back to like 350.
	Gold could still move higher.
	In an interview with Kitco, Tom Bruce, macro-investment strategist at Tanglewood Total Wealth Management, said that the market is underestimating the Smar-a-Laga Accord trade.
	If Trump achieves his goal, It would be a game changer for gold in its own right.
	Now this is the interesting part.
	He says the Mar-a-Lago Accord calls for a weaker U.S. dollar and for lower interest rates.
	This is the perfect environment for gold.
	Chaos, uncertainty, economic volatility, that all helps gold.
	If he wants lower interest rates, That helps gold.
	If he wants a weaker dollar because he wants more exports, that helps gold as well.
	And yet, the same idiots were calling for selling U.S. gold.
	He does have stupid advisors.
	This is the guy who bankrupted several casinos.
	Anyway, Trump's...
	Import tariffs have sparked a global trade war.
	Many nations are now looking past any potential U.S. influence.
	Last week, a French bank reduced its exposure to U.S. equities and the U.S. dollar, favoring the euro and the yen.
	At the same time, it maintained its gold holdings at 7% of its portfolio.
	The bank expects gold prices to average around $3,300 an ounce in the fourth quarter.
	Uncertainty around the Trump administration trade policies could continue to push the U.S. dollar lower, further supporting gold prices in the near term, they said.
	And a shift from America first to America alone.
	Seems to be where he's going.
	Central banks may further reduce U.S. dollar holdings with gold being a beneficiary.
	Well, as it surged yesterday, actually before that, the news came out yesterday, and as the news was coming out from Goldman Sachs, I told you about Bank of America adjusting their forecast.
	Goldman Sachs raised theirs.
	They said, we think by the end of 2025, it might be up to $3,300.
	They raised it to that from $3,100 because...
	It was getting pretty close to 3,100, and yesterday it got up to within, I think it's, like I said before, I think it got up to 3,070.
	Goldman and their projections said that in the most optimistic extreme, they call it the tail scenario, they said it could go up to 4,500 in the short term.
	Well, nobody knows about any of that stuff.
	But what we do know is that, like I said before, the dollar is not stable.
	All of these stable coins, they're not coins.
	They're not physical.
	They're digital.
	That's a warning flag for anybody.
	And as I said before, regardless of all this price stuff, regardless of whether it goes to $4,500 or $10,000 or $20,000 or $50,000, the real issue is privacy.
	Privacy in your financial transactions.
	If you don't have that, you're going to be controlled.
	So we've got a lot of states that are working to make gold and silver.
	Legal tender.
	25 of them, as a matter of fact.
	Utah got a lot of press this last week, but there are now 25 states that have looked at this, and they said we're even getting some traditionally blue states that are demonstrating interest.
	This is from a group that is pushing this, Kevin Freeman, the author of Pirate Money, and he said, and it's all constitutional.
	It's the Constitution that says that although the federal government is to coin money, as that's where they get the Bitcoin stuff and all the rest of these digital coins, they'll call it a coin and keep it constitutional, even when it's not a coin.
	The Constitution permits states to make gold and silver coin tender and payment of debts.
	And so a lot of them are putting that into law, saying, hey, if somebody's got gold or silver, you have to accept that as payment.
	Legislators in Mississippi introduced a bill to make gold and silver a legal tender in the state.
	It would allow citizens to use gold or silver to settle debts and for private transactions.
	In December of 2024, this last December, Missouri introduced the Constitutional Money Act, which, among other things, would recognize gold and silver as legal tender.
	And so he said, we're getting a lot of bipartisan support.
	The 25 states, if you're one of them, Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Montana, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming.
	Half of the states are already looking at making...
	Gold and silver, legal tender.
	Because it used to be that American banks had to keep gold reserves for what they put out.
	I remember when we used to go to Williamsburg in the early days, I'd take the kids up there a lot, and I'd give them my version of what's going on versus the Rockefeller.
	I really did enjoy the guy that did Thomas Jefferson.
	He's now much older, of course, as we all are, and he is now, I think, still at Monticello, where he...
	He portrays a retired Jefferson that is there.
	But when people talk to him, they say, where are you from?
	He'd say, North Carolina.
	Oh, the bank's there.
	They've got a really bad reputation.
	They don't keep gold behind their script.
	And it was the banks that were writing the script for everything.
	When we went to Hong Kong, we adopted my daughter.
	We were there.
	And I started looking at it, and it's like, wow.
	So this is a denomination of the currency, and here's the same denomination over here.
	And they look radically different.
	Different artwork, different colors, sometimes different sizes, and I looked at it more closely, and they were private banks.
	They had to have actual money backing that up.
	It wasn't issued by Central Bank of Hong Kong.
	And so until the 1930s, that was something that was done here in America, but we have dispensed with that as we have so many other things.
	On Rumble, Franzen says, what's the device that DK is reading from?
	This is a remarkable pad, and I switched from the other one that I had because this one is really set up to handle documents.
	The other one was really set up to take notes.
	And so this one allows you to easily annotate documents and to move pages around within the document, to delete pages.
	So when I read an article, if it wasn't anything on that particular page, I'd just get rid of it so I can...
	Whisk past it.
	But it's also got, not very bright, but it does have a backlight on it.
	So that helps us with some of the issues that we had when I was using a light on the desk or on the microphone to do it.
	We're getting reflections and other things that were not nice.
	I had a listener who'd known me for a while.
	He says, that light is making your eyebrows white.
	And I said, my eyebrows are white.
	It's making them even whiter.
	We changed that.
	It's got a lot of different features like that that are good.
	And also highlights and color, which makes it easier to read.
	It also means you aren't printing thousands of pages a month.
	That's right.
	Yeah. We did that from the other one that I had was called Supernote.
	And that was at the urging of Whistler, who was doing the printing.
	And he said, you know, he's spending a lot of money on toner and paper and all the rest of the stuff.
	It's like, yeah.
	And it was a big...
	Paper Chase Hassle is amazing how much paper we're going through and how much toner we were going through.
	And so it saved us a lot of money to go to the Super Note, but then it had some issues.
	Like I said, I couldn't delete pages within a PDF document, and then...
	They changed the navigation.
	I would have to go through it.
	If I wanted to skip through a bunch of stuff, I'd have to go for it.
	If I had like 12 pages or something, I'd remember the page that I was on, go back to that, type in the other page, and then I would have to, when I was here on the show, type in the new page.
	And they made that a lot more cumbersome to type in the page.
	It was already cumbersome when I was reading my notes.
	Anyway, that's maybe more detail than you wanted.
	But I like this one.
	This is the remarkable...
	Pro, paper pro, I think they call it, when they added the backlight and the color highlighting.
	We're going to take a quick break, folks, and we will come back, and I want to talk a little bit about what's going on with war.
	And we'll talk about Greenland as well, and then there are also some interesting things that are happening with education.
	So we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	ORCHESTRA PLAYS In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Travis wanted me to mention to you about how we're going to change where the program is and a little bit about how it's set up.
	For the longest time, I want to give people an opportunity to be able to get the audio broadcast, which a lot of people listen to the audio broadcast afterwards, to be able to get that without commercials for just a small donation of like $5 a month.
	That's what a lot of the streaming services do, streaming services like Pandora.
	Thank you.
	What is this?
	Oh, okay.
	All right.
	I'll take a look at that.
	Oh, yeah.
	I have this one.
	As a matter of fact, I'm about to come up with it.
	But we've had issues in terms of not being able to get our money out of Rockfin.
	And so I just want to tell people, please don't support us there with that.
	And we've also had issues with the commercials being put in.
	I spent a good deal of time trying to set the commercials up and do fewer of them.
	I didn't realize I had a lot of people start to complain to us about the commercials saying they're coming in and cutting the cutting out what you're saying right in the middle of a sentence or They had, when we first started doing it at Spreaker, they were pretty good at setting the commercials in, and they didn't do that many of them.
	They might have like eight commercial breaks or something like that in a program of three hours.
	And then they did more and more and more.
	And I didn't realize that they were putting in 17 commercial breaks.
	They were doing them like every five minutes.
	And so I typically like to do it like every 15 to 30 minutes or something like that.
	And they're complaining about that.
	And so that has hurt our revenue because they put us at the back of the list just like they did when I shut off all the ads when they were pushing Pride Month so hard that one year.
	And so we do that.
	They push you to the back of the list for commercials, and then even when you turn the ads back on, you're still at the back of the list.
	It took a very long time for that to come back, and now it's disappearing again because I don't have as many ads.
	So for a lot of different reasons, even if you listened to all of the ads, we would make less than a dollar.
	In a month off of that.
	And so we want to set it up where people have the option where they don't have to listen to the ads and it would actually help us more.
	And so we're going to set that up.
	You can still listen to it for free and you still have the ads.
	It'll be there.
	But we're going to set it up and we're going to move it over to Substack.
	We're going to have it set up so that people can get that content on Substack without ads.
	We're also going to be live streaming in some new places as well.
	And places where you'll be able to make a tip.
	The problem is that still it'll have to be like Rumble where you can make a tip and leave a comment at the same time.
	We like that, but maybe we can come up with a code.
	That's one of the things that I use Travis for is monitoring the different chats and trying to find comments.
	So maybe we can put something there that you can use a code that you left a tip or something and you want to...
	Say something about that.
	But anyway, so we've got some changes that are coming up.
	Bottom line is we're going to start phasing it out.
	We'll let you know where we're going to be and how things are going to change.
	Let's talk a little bit about War.
	We're already on Odyssey, Rumble, BitChute, DLive.
	I'm going to try to set us up a channel on a new streaming platform called Kick as well.
	So there's plenty of options out there.
	I know a lot of people like Rockfin, but it's just not really feasible for us to maintain it anymore.
	Yeah, we're going to be moving it from that.
	By the way, with Rumble, thank you, Travis.
	You should mention to people where they can find it.
	And if you go to davidknight.news, that takes you to our website.
	That older address is still there, thedavidknightshow.com.
	But davidknight.news is much shorter.
	And that will show you where the program is, as well as ways that you can support us if you would like to do that.
	But I also want to mention that...
	If you watched us some on Roku, we were going through Vimeo.
	Vimeo canceled us.
	We knew that was going to happen.
	Anyway, Rumble is on Roku.
	So you can still watch us on Roku through Rumble.
	Just to let you know if that's your preference.
	Just download the Rumble app and search The David Knight Show and you'll be able to watch it live.
	Or all the videos that we put up after the fact.
	That's right.
	Let's talk a little bit about war.
	And isn't it interesting?
	This is what I said from the very beginning, and now I see that RT put this up.
	I said, I haven't seen anybody in the U.S. really take this approach except for RT.
	The signal war plans link.
	But the bombing people is okay.
	Just talking about it is not.
	In other words, what everybody was upset about was national security, national security.
	What about that?
	Well, what about...
	The morality of bombing civilians and bragging about it.
	That's okay after the fact.
	Mass murder is okay.
	Just don't talk about it ahead of time.
	They'll see the big board that's out there.
	So as I said, this is actually on RT.
	This is a historian from Germany.
	He says there's a scandal exciting American mainstream media in minds, yet there's an important nuance.
	It is not the bombing that is a scandal.
	What is troubling many Americans is neither what Russian philosopher Alexander Dugan said, rightly, that the Israeli genocide of the Palestinians with U.S. bombs, nor is it the renewed American air campaign against Yemen, bombing large numbers of essentially defenseless people, men, women, and children in a bloody, dusty pulp, has long been a bipartisan tradition of the indispensable nation.
	Yeah, America, the indispensable nation.
	And that's the real issue.
	The civilian bombing campaigns.
	What Americans do find irritating is when their leaders spill the beans too early.
	In a cluster fiasco reminiscent of those loose-lipped German generals who were caught out last year prattling on about launching their tourist missiles at Russia via Ukraine, a whole gaggle of Washington top officials have made fools of themselves by ridiculously and fecklessly breaching Elementary security.
	The opponents of the Trump administration are trying to squeeze every little drop of dramatic embarrassment for this foul-up.
	Hillary Clinton is now having her moment gloating over the fact that these people are doing what she openly did.
	Only difference is they made a mistake.
	She did it intentionally.
	The Trumpists, meanwhile, are not having a self-flagellation procession down the National Mall, but they're closing ranks.
	And even boasting about it, like I said, when AI was caught, at least it says, you're right, I shouldn't have said that, I'm sorry.
	We're not going to have any of that from the bipartisan crowds.
	Hillary Clinton's not going to ever apologize for what she did.
	These people won't apologize for what they did.
	And quite frankly, I don't care about national security.
	It has been the veil that they have put over every criminal action, the veil they've put over everything that they wish to keep secret from us, and I'm sick of it.
	It's not about national security.
	Bombing every other country that they wish at will does not help our personal security as Americans.
	National security is just about the power of government.
	It's not about you or I. It's not about keeping peace.
	Vice President Vance has denied any disagreements with the administration, and that's precisely the thing that he displayed in the signal check.
	There he doubted the wisdom of the attacks on Yemen, not because killing people is a problem, But because he didn't like the timing and the fact that Europe was going to profit from it.
	Yeah. He was also concerned about Israel doing something that they didn't control and doing at first, and that was to violate the ceasefire.
	He doesn't say that, but that's a key issue there as well.
	You know, this is predicated.
	This is all, you know, Yemen was attacking shipping.
	Based in solidarity with the Palestinians in Gaza, there was a ceasefire.
	They abided by the ceasefire.
	The Americans believe that the Israelis are going to violate the ceasefire first, so they wanted to do it before they did it, so they had control of the situation.
	In case you don't like Trump and his government, please don't be naive enough to make a hero out of Goldberg, he says.
	Posing as a liberal, Goldberg is a highly aggressive Zionist.
	As a young man, he moved from the U.S.
	to Israel to enter its military forces, then served as a prison guard in a large camp for Palestinians.
	I talked about this yesterday.
	About which he has written a self-revealingly egocentric and, in fact, self-incriminating memoir, admitting at least covering up brutal torture of defenses.
	And I said yesterday, perhaps...
	He had some same type of thing.
	Maybe they use it like Trump's beloved CIA director, Gina Haspel.
	He promoted her.
	The only person who went to jail for torturing people and then getting them to confess to things that didn't exist, things that they hadn't done, weren't going to do, and then taking those false confessions and using them to lie us into a war in Iraq, the only person that got punished for that was John Kiriakou.
	Who exposed the torture and the lies.
	All the liars, all the torturers, all the people who lied us into war, they were rewarded.
	Trump rewarded the person who was running the whole thing after he said, all those weapons of mass destruction, we were lied into that war.
	George W. Bush should have never put us into that war.
	And then what does he do?
	He takes the person who ran the lie campaign and makes her head of the CIA.
	For over two decades, Goldberg has consistently used his great media and political influence to agitate for and embellish American aggression in the Middle East, very much in line with what Israeli governments perceive as Israel's national interest.
	says Yemen is the poorest country in the Middle East and one of the poorest in the world and it is using a geographical choke point To do the ethically and legally obligatory right thing, to fight against Israeli genocide as good as it can, while the collective West is on the side of the genociders.
	He says, we live in a morally perverse, upside-down world.
	Hence, what is really bizarre about the current signal scandal in the U.S. is what is outside the American media frame, namely the bombings themselves.
	And that's where I would jump in.
	He said, they're taken for granted.
	America is a country where they watch bad TV, drink too much sugary fizz, and bomb the world.
	You think that's an exaggeration about bombing the world?
	He said on any given day, it's more likely than not that the U.S. is bombing someone somewhere for some reason or the other, usually a bad reason.
	As of 2022, three years ago already, official surveys found that America and its vassals had dropped over 337,000 bombs and missiles.
	Note, he said, that this figure excludes, for instance, the Gulf War of 1990 and 1991, where there was another 88,500 tons of bombs.
	It also excludes the 1990 wars in the former Yugoslavia.
	Now, listen to this.
	To put it differently, he says, over 20 years, the U.S. has conducted an average of 46 airstrikes per day.
	An average of 46 airstrikes per day.
	And that's not counting 9-11.
	Was that a bombing inside the building?
	Was it a directed energy weapon?
	Whatever. Either way, it was an inside job.
	It began with that.
	It all kicked off.
	Killing Americans so they could have the...
	Authorization for the use of military force and not bother with any war declarations.
	And then we had, by the time we got to Obama, we had seven wars going.
	That's how we get an average of 46 airstrikes a day.
	How we have 337,000 bombs and missiles dropped.
	The military-industrial complex is very happy, very profitable with all this stuff.
	This is being done in our name.
	Our name.
	As of March 25th, 10 days after these new attacks began, at least 79 people have been killed and more than 100 injured.
	And all this is happening while these principals who are, you know, scandalizing everybody with their signal chat.
	That's a scandal.
	But the fact that they're bombing people on the other side of the world, in the poorest country, in the Middle East, and they go to party at a million dollar a plate fundraiser at Mar-a-Lago.
	The decadence and the debauchery and the murder is disgusting.
	Absolutely disgusting.
	And Trump says he's going to continue bombing Yemen for a long time, he said.
	On Wednesday, he claimed that the U.S.'s daily airstrikes on Yemen have been very successful.
	He wants to get that average up.
	We should be able to get more than 50 airstrikes a day.
	Shouldn't we?
	I mean, we're America.
	We need to be number one in airstrikes every day.
	It's been very successful.
	He said, we vowed the bombing campaign would continue for a long time, no matter how morally unjust and unconstitutional.
	Since the Trump administration launched the bombing campaign, the Hooties, I call them the Hooties, the Hooties, Hooties have restarted their attacks, operations that they had ceased, with the Gaza ceasefire.
	So, that's productive, isn't it?
	We had a ceasefire.
	We don't want a ceasefire.
	We want to be dropping bombs and missiles so we can buy more of them from Raytheon and Boeing and all the rest of these companies, right?
	Dealing with Houthis and the Blowhards.
	Yeah. The Houthis and the Blowhards.
	The two different organizations fighting each other.
	Since the Trump administration launched this bombing campaign, they've started this up.
	So they're looking to do something, said Trump.
	They want to know, how do we stop?
	How do we stop?
	How can we have peace?
	The Hooties want peace because they're getting the hell knocked out of them, said Trump to reporters in the Oval Office.
	He said, they want us to stop so badly, they've got to say no, but I can only say that the attacks every day, every night, have been very successful beyond our wildest expectations.
	He doesn't say dreams.
	Does he dream at night of killing civilians?
	We're going to do it for a long time.
	We can keep it going for a long time, he said.
	So, there you go.
	How has that worked out?
	Is that going to bring them to their feet?
	Have the civilian bombing campaigns...
	That was always the argument.
	Remember when Hitler started it.
	He was going to bring the British to their feet by bombing London.
	Did it?
	No. It strengthened their resolve.
	And we're going to bring the Germans to their feet and so forth.
	Well, the only time they did it was when we just evaporated a couple of cities with a nuclear weapon.
	And again, it was a civilian campaign.
	And you always hear the argument, well, that ended the war.
	And it was better that that happened than that we fight them island to island.
	Well, I would agree.
	But if you're in a war with combatants...
	Then why didn't you drop a nuclear bomb on that island where the combatants were?
	You didn't have to fight them hand-to-hand with Marines.
	You could have nuked that island.
	And you could have continued to do that.
	Why didn't you do that?
	Instead, you decided to kill all those civilians.
	And as people pointed out, Nagasaki, the place in Japan where they had the most Christians, they made that number one.
	So, number two, actually.
	But I think, I forget now the order, was it?
	I think Nagasaki was second.
	I think it was Hiroshima first.
	Anyway, it's not going to make any difference.
	Why is that?
	Why is that?
	Why does it galvanize the population when you bomb the civilian population?
	Because they understand how immoral that is.
	Everybody fundamentally knows how immoral that is.
	And when they see their babies blown to pieces, That galvanizes them.
	When you attack a civilian population, now these people, whether it kills them or not, they're going to come after you.
	It does not demoralize them.
	Trump couldn't be more wrong.
	The M&E armed forces affirm that the American aggression will only increase their steadfastness.
	Of course.
	That's why.
	Because you're not going to demoralize them.
	Because they understand that what you are doing is immoral, and because of what it has done to their loved ones.
	From 2015 to 2022, the Houthis faced a brutal U.S.-backed Saudi-UAE war against them, which involved a heavy bombing campaign, a blockade, and a ground campaign.
	Trump supported the war during his first term in office.
	He vetoed a war powers resolution passed by Congress that would have ended U.S. involvement in the conflict.
	This is anti-war writing that.
	And they're right.
	So now the U.S. has launched another 15 airstrikes around Yemen's capital.
	Got to get that number up.
	And Mike Waltz's Venmo account.
	This is the latest little scandal.
	He had a Venmo account.
	And people could see his phone contacts.
	They get the phone numbers of people like Marco Rubio and others that are there.
	I looked at this and I thought, this is a mass murderer who is allowed to have a Venmo account, but not me.
	I get my Venmo accounts and PayPal accounts taken down.
	I get my podcast taken down.
	When I talk about the mass murder campaigns from Big Pharma, Or the mass murder campaigns from the military industrial complex.
	Then they take down my accounts.
	They debank me.
	And they censor me.
	They deplatform me.
	But not Mike Waltz.
	He gets a little slap on the wrist saying, yeah, people can see the big board.
	And up there on the big board, you got the names of some of your other co-conspirators out there in this mass murder campaign.
	Meanwhile, Israeli strikes on Gaza kill 38 more Palestinians over another 24 hours.
	Is that anything new?
	Thomas Massey has introduced Dual Loyalty Disclosure Act.
	So he says, if we continue to allow dual citizens to run for federal office, candidates should disclose to voters all the countries in which they hold citizenship.
	And he has co-sponsors.
	Andy Biggs and Marjorie Taylor Greene and Clay Higgins have co-sponsored this.
	Well, look, we've had one guy who is a congressman and he wears his IDF uniform to Congress.
	We've got Rashida Tlaib, who when she won, she puts up not an American flag, but a Palestinian flag behind her.
	And she's got her...
	Family and friends going, you know, that kind of stuff when they win.
	You've got Dr. Oz, who was endorsed by Trump, a dual citizen with Turkey.
	Now he's going to put him in his administration, running CMS and things like that.
	But he endorsed him for Senate.
	Oz said, I'm not going to get rid of my Turkish citizenship unless I become a senator.
	Because he would get rid of it in name.
	Only. Because he would want to have access to top-secret information that he could then pass on to the Turks.
	He was in the Turkish army.
	He wasn't in the American army.
	So you tell me, when you've got a guy who's in the Israeli army and a guy who's in the Turkish army, they weren't in the American army, who are they loyal to?
	And certainly there's no question about who Rashida Tlaib is loyal to.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	Yeah, but they're going to visit it anyway.
	It's horrible to visit.
	Miserable place to live.
	Usha Vance.
	And I guess I should clarify this because I was saying this the other day with Karen.
	I said, so Usha's going to Greenland.
	She said, what is that?
	Well, U.S. officials went door-to-door in Greenland to find anybody who wanted to be visited by the Vances.
	And they found no one.
	A local travel company had said, well, she can come to a photo op at our business.
	And they canceled.
	Why is that?
	Well, because people in Greenland are fed up with all this stuff.
	No one wants to talk to her.
	At least no one in Greenland.
	U.S. officials have reportedly been traveling around the Danish-controlled territory looking for locals who wanted to receive a visit from the second lady, according to a report from Danish TV.
	Greenlanders are replying, no thanks.
	Residents aren't the only ones snubbing the second lady ahead of her high-profile visit to the island.
	A travel company based in Greenland's capital initially said that it would host her, but then canceled it out on Thursday.
	The company initially said yes, then backed out after closer consideration, they said.
	We have now informed the consulate that we do not want her visit, as we cannot accept the underlying agenda.
	And will not be part of a press show that quite, of course, comes with it.
	No thanks to a nice visit, Greenland belongs to the Greenlanders.
	And, of course, they just had an election where all of the different parties were against the U.S. controlling them.
	There was so much excitement around Usha's visit to Greenland this Friday that I decided that I didn't want her to have all that fun by herself, so I'm going to join her, said J.D. Vance.
	Hmm. Just the opposite, isn't it?
	So, Greenlanders and Danish authorities are not pleased about the trip.
	The Danish Prime Minister accused the U.S. of exerting, quote, unacceptable pressure on Greenland.
	I have to say it's unacceptable pressure being placed on Greenland with Denmark in this situation, and it's pressure that we will resist.
	You cannot make a private visit with official representatives from another country when the acting Greenlandic government has made it very clear they do not want a visit at this time.
	The U.S. delegation's arrival is, quote, clearly not a visit that is about what Greenland needs or wants.
	But, the Prime Minister said, we know that Trump is serious.
	He wants Greenland.
	Therefore, this visit cannot be seen independently of anything else.
	The way this is reported by the Independent out of the U.K., listen to this paragraph.
	Thanks to climate change driven by human burning of fossil fuels, blah, blah, blah.
	What? First of all, there's no climate change.
	It's not happening.
	Secondly, to say that it's humans who are doing it because they're burning fossil fuel.
	Look, is it fossil fuel?
	Is it cow farts?
	I can't remember what it was.
	None of this stuff is true.
	I mean, it's like you're going to have stable coins.
	They're digital currency.
	None of that is true.
	None of this stuff is true either.
	But they're saying that now it is important because now, because of global warming, the polar ice caps are melting, which they're not.
	Talked about that over and over again.
	There's been numerous studies showing that it is maintained, actually increased.
	Nevertheless, they say new corridors are opening up around the Arctic Circle as the ice is melting.
	It's not melting.
	And so they said, so that's why all this is happening.
	Some people say it was because of national security, except that we also have a military base that is already there, and it was never a problem for us to have a military base there.
	I think that it's all the rare earth minerals.
	It's the other things that are there.
	I think it's chronic capitalism.
	Look, it's going to be a lot easier for them to grab Greenland and then sell it off to their billionaire buddies to exploit than it is going to be for Besant and Burgum and Lutnik to sell off American land and put those assets to work, as all three have said.
	So I think it's about that.
	It's money for his buddies.
	The Danish defense minister has said that Trump has gone too far.
	He says, Trump said, I think we'll go as far as we have to go.
	He says, well, I think you've gone too far already.
	We need Greenland and the world needs us to have Greenland.
	This fits perfectly into what I was saying earlier about the fact that Trump wants to have one distraction after the other to take us away from things that are important.
	And to say this is about national security.
	Well, that has always been the lie that they sell everything with.
	Meanwhile, in Greenland, 85% of Greenlanders oppose incorporation of the U.S. Only 6% backed it.
	The task for the advances is to find those six people.
	Well, 6%.
	6% of 56,000.
	Putin, though, believes that we are serious.
	He says we will not allow encroachments.
	And he says that we are open to doing partnerships.
	Politics doesn't matter if there's money to be made, right?
	Just like the people in Silicon Valley.
	You know, Musk is open to partnerships.
	You have Zuckerberg open to partnerships.
	Gates is open to partnerships.
	Trump is open to partnerships with all of them as well.
	So we'll see what happens with all this stuff.
	But I'm going to rush to this next section here because we do have...
	We've got Jack Lawson coming up, and we're going to talk about that because it is time to prepare as these people are literally crazy.
	I wanted to talk a little bit about what is on the way in terms of net zero and the rest of this stuff, and put it in the context of the tariffs.
	Net zero will make air travel the preserve of the privileged, and we've got an airline boss admitting that.
	Qantas Airline.
	For most of the last decade, writes the Telegraph, corporate leaders have insisted that the transition to carbon-neutral economy was a win-win, that it would save the planet, would all get richer at the same time.
	Of course, they will.
	But hold on, the Australian airline Qantas has just broken ranks, admitting that flying may soon be the preserve of only the privileged, while a wealth of research is making it clear that environmental goals have hammered the economy.
	Interestingly enough, Senator Lee and Senator Tuberville have introduced a bill to abolish the TSA.
	Hey, nobody would love to see the TSA go more than I would love to see the TSA go.
	But all the stuff that they're doing would still be done.
	They say, well, we're going to privatize this.
	Oh, okay.
	It'd be much better if somebody's making a profit out of this, right?
	That's the difference between the Democrats.
	They're both going to frisk you down.
	They're both going to do all the same stuff to you.
	But with the Republicans, somebody's going to be able to make a lot of money out of this.
	And they both said that.
	They were going to privatize.
	I'm looking at this.
	It's like, yes, great.
	And I read it.
	It's like, oh, they want to privatize it.
	And that's what this is all about.
	So they said the bosses are starting to admit that the obvious, what has been obvious to everybody for quite some time, about net zero.
	They said in their writing from the UK, if you thought that the summer flight to Malaga or Crete with a family was already looking eye-wateringly expensive, you haven't seen anything yet.
	The word budget is looking increasingly out of place for a no-frills aviation industry.
	Flights to Spain will cost 26% more this year out of the UK than last.
	Those kinds of price rises are becoming the norm for many destinations, but it'll get worse very soon.
	The CEO of Qantas admitted this week that flying May...
	Well, become so expensive that it is something only for the privileged.
	And not just flying, but here in America.
	Cars. Cars will become so expensive that only the wealthy will be able to do it.
	Because, you know, Trump just added 25% to foreign cars yesterday.
	The average price of a car is $48,000, so he just added $12,000 to the price of a car.
	What's all this stuff about?
	You're not going to pay the tariffs.
	Other people will pay the tariffs, right?
	Well, you've got to pay the tariffs if you buy anything.
	And who benefits from all this?
	Tesla, more than anybody else.
	Elon Musk.
	As one person on X said, Nightwatch N8.
	This was sent to me by a listener.
	Thank you.
	Why Elon was put here?
	He said, and he had a list there, 12 states who are working on banning automobiles.
	You know, the real automobiles, not the electric stuff that you need tethered to the grid that they control, but the ones that use fuel.
	And, of course, it's California doing it and 11 others that are tethered to them.
	And, you know, look, Biden was against cars because of his green agenda.
	And what did he do?
	He ran sanctions.
	And he said, it's going to be very painful, but that's where we got to go.
	Now, Trump is doing really a war on cars.
	I don't know any other thing to call it when it's 25% tax.
	But he's doing it to help us as a nation, isn't he?
	And he's not doing it and calling it a sanction.
	He's calling it a tariff.
	And the other person who is going to benefit from all this stuff is going to be Elon Musk, who is moving to rental.
	Why did that go?
	You'll own nothing and you'll be happy.
	You'll rent everything.
	Trump's new car tariffs are a $100 billion tax increase that nobody wants.
	And he admitted that it's going to be $100 billion.
	Actually, that was his staff.
	Trump said it's going to be way more than that.
	Can the MAGA people get their head around this?
	That it's a tax?
	That it's something that you are going to pay?
	They said, on reason, they said the president gleefully predicted the cost to consumers could be as much as 10 times higher.
	Few trade policy moves are more abundantly counterproductive and costly than tariffs on cars and on car parts.
	And when we look at the entire price of a car, average $48,000 today, adding $12,000 to it, taking a $48,000 car and jumping it to $60,000 automatically, well, most of the cars that are going to be sold here are a mixed bag.
	And so there's going to be some parts that are involved in it, and those parts are going to be taxed.
	And so it won't be the full $12,000, but they're looking at it being $5,000 or more added to the price of a car because of this back and forth and back and forth.
	They had a trade agreement that Trump was so proud of.
	They had NAFTA did it, and you had then his USMCA.
	And so for about 30 years, we've been telling all the businesses, hey, we want you to distribute your production across the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.
	And now Trump is going to bring a screeching halt to that.
	And while he gets everybody's attention for this, he's working on the crypto stuff in the background.
	He said, instead, the tariffs are going to make cars and light trucks more expensive and likely reduce the number of cars made and sold in America.
	The only winner is likely to be the federal government's tax coffers and Musk.
	Americans will pay the money for the privilege of buying a car that the government dislikes for arbitrary reasons.
	Again, for Biden, it's, oh, I don't like your car because it burns gasoline.
	For Trump, I don't like your car because it came from that country.
	Immediately, he disputed his own staff's estimates of $100 million.
	He came up with a much higher tax increase on Americans.
	He says, I don't think ultimately we could probably get anywhere from $600 billion to a trillion, he said.
	I think we'll go from $600 billion to a trillion in two years.
	Just like Biden.
	Yeah, you're going to pay more for this, and you're going to have fewer choices.
	And it's going to be painful, but hey, it's worth it for my agenda.
	Biden said that.
	Trump said that.
	They've got a slightly different agenda that they're selling you, but they both don't care about your pain.
	It's worth it to them.
	If the goal of tariffs is to draw more manufacturing in the U.S., then the tariff revenue would decline over time rather than increase.
	Right? But whatever the final figure, so in other words, he's saying, well, I think it's going to start out at this and then it's going to get bigger.
	Well, then you're expecting that there's not going to be any domestic increase in production, that instead we're going to continue along the same path and you're just going to get more and more tax revenue because if people start making this stuff here in America, then that's going to cut out your revenue.
	They said, whatever the final figure turns out to be, the new tariffs are a significant disruption for the auto industry that employs more than 7 million people.
	Even before Wednesday night's announcement, Industry insiders projected lower sales and economic disruption.
	See, this is something that's going to hurt the private economy.
	California has just lost a tremendous number of private jobs and added even more jobs into the public sector.
	So that's where we're headed with all of this stuff.
	Cox Automotive projects that there will be 700,000 fewer cars sold in America.
	You know, GM and Ford stock went down on this announcement.
	A 4.3% decline from last year's total.
	And history suggests that everything is going to get more expensive, including even the domestically produced cars, because we saw the same thing happen when Reagan did it.
	Reagan imposed import quotas on Japanese cars.
	The result was higher prices for cars made in Japan, of course, but also higher prices for cars made in America and Europe.
	Because they faced less competition, car makers simply started charging more.
	So, the $100 billion tax is likely not going to be the only cost incurred by these tariffs.
	So, is it worth it to ask, what is the Trump administration trying to accomplish here?
	And what is a foreign car?
	If you distributed your production across U.S., Mexico, and Canada, if you have a BMW that's built in South Carolina, is that a foreign car because of the name on the hood?
	What about a Toyota truck that is assembled in Tennessee?
	What about a Ford that is built in Mexico with parts sourced?
	Well, the bottom line is that they want a ban on private cars.
	And I think this is one of the reasons why Tesla is the big winner in this.
	You know, there's not any company that sells cars in America that makes the cars 100% in America except for Tesla.
	What a coincidence.
	Isn't that amazing?
	And so, while competitors like Ford and GM will see, just with the parts that are going back and forth, they'll see anywhere from $4,000 to $5,000, according to industry averages, per vehicle, even though they're building them largely in the U.S. Again, if a car comes in, it's going to be much more than that.
	But he's not going to have any of that.
	And as I said, we've seen...
	The U.S. government hawking his cars as people are attacking the dealerships because they don't like his politics.
	As you see his sales in Europe tanking down 49%.
	And you see the competition from the Japanese companies.
	This has Elon Musk's fingerprints all over it.
	And we know where this is all headed.
	It's so effective.
	And in the UK, they have gone down the path that all these vandals that just stop oil people, the ones who are throwing paint on all the paintings and vandalizing everything, they've now said, we're ending our campaign because the UK government has now adopted what we wanted.
	They're getting rid of the quote-unquote fossil fuels.
	So they're going to get rid of the cars.
	They're going to make sure that you...
	A, can't afford them.
	That's a big part of what Trump is doing.
	Big boost in the price of cars, so you can't afford them.
	You'll have to rent them.
	Rent them by the ride.
	And whether they use this excuse of, well, we've got to save the planet from melting down, or we've got to save American manufacturing, either way, it comes out the same thing.
	Ending private cars that are independent of the grid.
	Well, Jack Lawson is waiting, and I want to get to him real quickly on rock fan Gregory Dish.
	Thank you for the tip.
	He says, what do you think about Trump and Elon Musk?
	I think I just told you.
	On Rumble, high boost.
	David, David, David, higher taxes is winning.
	Don't you know that?
	That's right.
	I am so tired of winning in this particular way.
	I'm really tired of it.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we're going to have joining us is going to be Jack Lawson.
	Great to have him on again, and great to have his book.
	Back in stock and an updated website and many other books that are now back in stock as well.
	So we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back with Jack Lawson.
	And the new website is jacklawsonbooks.com, and we'll talk about that when we come back.
	You still get the Civil Defense Manual.
	Now it's back in stock in a bigly way, as Trump would say.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, welcome back, and it's great to have Jack Lawson back, and it's even better to have Civil Defense Manual back.
	And it's not only back, but he's got a brand-new website.
	He's got new books that are there.
	He's got a new substack as well.
	He wrote this to me.
	He says, People have been seeing the out of stock when they go to the website for so long.
	He said, I think they stopped checking.
	He said, would you show what we've got and show that, Travis.
	Show the shipment of books that he's got there.
	He said, we've got three tons of books and we're in the process of filling the back orders.
	He said, the outage of books has been a whopping four months and ten days since all of this DEI people had screwed this up at his distributor.
	They told me, all of a sudden said, oh, we just realized we got no stock.
	Why didn't you restock on all this stuff?
	So he's taking care of that.
	He's got, I guess you're doing the distribution yourself, Jack, but he's got a new website, he's got more books, he's got a Substack link, and it's good to have him back.
	Thank you for joining us, Jack.
	Tell us a little bit about that.
	Good to be on your show again, David.
	Thank you.
	Yeah, tell us a little bit about that.
	Jack Lawson Books, it's a great website, and it's got a lot of different things there.
	You've got a couple of new books as well as Civil Defense Manual.
	I wrote those books quite a while ago.
	One's my very first book.
	It's a novel.
	Sorry. It's a novel.
	My son calls it the encyclopedia.
	It's a historical novel.
	The other one is a book called The Slaver's Wheel, about Colonel Sully DeFontaine, who was like a father to me.
	I met him by running across one of his friends in Africa.
	And the long and short of it is, Amazon, I call it the Communist Commissar Censoring Committee, for some reason didn't like the content of my books.
	I deleted my account.
	Something to the fact that my books didn't meet their criteria.
	Well, they apparently didn't read the first one.
	But the long and short of it is, they're in the process of being printed.
	They'll be up and running.
	I have the Civil Defense manual back.
	I'm still astounded and dumbfounded that they, them, or whatever the pronouns were that were sent to me, they couldn't see.
	When they pushed their cart by to take orders that there weren't hundreds of books there.
	There was nothing there.
	So whoever they hired apparently has got blinders on or can't count.
	What I am in the process of doing, there is no civil defense system in this country.
	That's right.
	So I've started one.
	I'm in the process of doing video streaming.
	On different books that people can look at on their computer.
	And we have what we call the Certified American Program.
	Why do I have this?
	Because there is no civil defense.
	There is FEMA, and everybody's got a pretty good idea what they're capable of after a hurricane.
	Another DEI group, yeah.
	I mean, I get up in the morning, David, and I...
	Starting to feel like one of those 21 million Americans getting Social Security that's getting close to 200 at Creekmore every time I get up.
	But the long and short of it is that there's nothing out there.
	I have a lot of free resources.
	If they go to www.jacklawsonbooks.com, there's a lot of information on there.
	I'm putting more and more on every day.
	I'm giving this away.
	Why? Because I'm more than interested in more than just selling books.
	I'm interested in the future of this country.
	I had a talk with a very powerful person yesterday, very wealthy person.
	He is a Korean War veteran.
	He's a retired colonel.
	He was an attorney for 35 years in the swamp.
	Trump's security directors.
	He says this next four years is going to be the most tumultuous period in the history of this country since the Civil War.
	I've been saying that for a long time.
	And, you know, it's interesting because the fourth turning, I don't know if you're familiar with that book by Strauss and Hal, but everybody talks about all these different generations, you know, millennials, this and that, and the X generation and so forth.
	And everybody's using all of their labels, but nobody wants to talk about the fact that we're in the midst of a fourth turning right now, and we've got these next four years are the tail end of it.
	These guys said in the early 1990s, like 1992, 1994.
	They said something's going to happen worldwide.
	In 2007-2008, which is about 15 years ahead of when it happened, that'll be financial, that'll kick off the fourth turning, and it'll probably finish up sometime around 2029.
	And lo and behold, the UN's got its 2030 world all planned out and all the rest of this stuff, and all these fourth turnings are massive economic stuff, usually accompanied by a war, and the previous two here, well, previous three in America were World War II and the Great Depression,
	prior to that civil war prior to that american revolution so yeah i agree it absolutely is there and and anybody that's paying attention has got to see this and has got to start preparing and civil defense manual is a key part of it you know we talk about having money that's going to be outside of their system that's physical but you also need to be able to have skills as well as Yes, I don't think the general American public...
	Well, I know they don't.
	The general American public thinks since number 47's taken office, the new administration's there, Musk is investigating and finding all of this money that was literally stolen.
	It's so bizarre, some of the things they're spending it for, that it's hard to even remember them.
	But these people are dug in like a North Carolina tick.
	They are not going to go away very easily.
	And I know what that's like because we used to live in North Carolina.
	We used to have to get those North Carolina takes out of our kids.
	My son went to scout sniper school in the Marine Corps there.
	And I bought him a new, I bought him a stainless steel Marine Corps, what's called a K-bar knife.
	It's a common knife they carry.
	And I said, how's your knife holding up?
	And he says, You mean the stainless steel one, Dad?
	And I said, yeah, that one.
	He said, well, there's nothing that's stainless steel in North Carolina.
	Anyway, some sailor in the amphibious ship stole it from him.
	But the long and short of it, there's trouble coming.
	I get a daily briefing.
	I subscribe to something called Forward Observer.
	This morning, I couldn't count all of the protests going on.
	Now, two months ago, there were four or five.
	It's over 200 now.
	Wow. And a large share of these are Tesla protests.
	These people just haven't gotten out in the street yet.
	They're throwing Molotov cocktails at dealerships, but they haven't gotten out in the street.
	All we need is a trigger.
	they'll be out in the street again oh absolutely and that's absolutely that's what people have to try to prepare to protect themselves with get together with their neighbors and uh get to know their neighbors and get to talking about what are we going to do if somebody comes in the neighborhood that's right yeah when you look at the way that they settle their grievances we've seen this with them in the wake of the supreme court abortion decision why they do they started uh
	Throwing Molotov cocktails in crisis pregnancy centers or churches or vandalism or things like that.
	And that's what we're seeing.
	We're seeing vandalism.
	And it's so misdirected.
	It's not even going after, you know, some of them have burned up dealerships and charging stations, which, again, is not an appropriate protest at all.
	But they have gone after people just because they've got a Tesla.
	They don't know what the politics of that person even is.
	And they've shown pictures of some of the people who've had their cars vandalized.
	Vandalized. One of them was a woman in a wheelchair.
	And they vandalized her car.
	They don't know or care what her politics are.
	And that's what we're looking at.
	That kind of insanity that can come after anybody.
	You don't have to do anything to get them offended.
	They can become offended by nothing.
	I've got a comment here on Rumble from Dustin Helm.
	He said, I just bought the books.
	I was hoping that they would come back in stock soon.
	So now you're shipping, right?
	Correct. We bought a shipping system, the computers we needed, and we're doing it ourselves.
	That's the message of your book, isn't it?
	You've got to do it yourself.
	You don't rely on anyone else.
	You're on your own.
	I think that people lose sight of the insanity of these people, the corruption in their minds.
	I know I have three of them in my family.
	61 blood and adopted.
	I've got three of them that basically turned Minnesota, did a large share of it, into what it is right now.
	And I was astounded to see.
	I mean, how many more governors and bureaucrats do we have?
	That are like this governor of Minnesota.
	You have a Chinese Communist Party office in St. Paul, Minnesota?
	I read that the other day, and I was just floored.
	Well, I've got people in our family, and of course, typically they're involved in education, because that's really where the mind virus is inculcated in people, these indoctrination centers.
	And it only gets worse if you go through it, and then you get right back out and come back in as a teacher and start teaching again, it seems like.
	I don't know.
	They can't tie their own shoes.
	They haven't been 500 miles from home.
	But I just don't bother to talk to them anymore.
	Their minds are so screwed up, you can't even reason with them.
	There's a saying, the inmates are running the asylum.
	Well, they were under 46 now, Trump 47. They're not running it right now, and they are like spoiled children.
	They're angry.
	They're looking to get their pound of flesh from someone.
	Oh, yeah.
	And that's the American public.
	That's the traditional.
	You know, one thing I'd really like to dispel.
	I went to psychological operations training.
	It's the British version of Fort Bragg, Special Forces.
	And one of the first things they do is make sure people think you're bigger than you are.
	I'm convinced this is only about 15% of the population.
	That thinks this way.
	And that's justified as a logical statement because of the election results last time.
	So the long and short of it is they're not 50%.
	They're 15%.
	That's my belief.
	And I think that is true.
	Maybe up to 25% with their sympathizers.
	15%. I agree, and I think that's true in so many different areas, that they want to look bigger than they really are.
	I remember the story going back to the Civil War, the early days of the Civil War.
	There was a Confederate general, and he was vastly outnumbered by all these people.
	And so there was a little clearing there where they could see the troops and other places where they couldn't see him.
	He just marched his troops around in a circle.
	So they thought he had a much larger army, and they held off attacking him until he could get some reinforcements.
	But I think that's really what we're...
	That's called the indirect approach.
	I have that in this book.
	Good, yeah.
	It's basically not having contact, but you read history about strategies, and there's some huge armies that totally outnumbered a defending force, and a defending force in one case...
	Marched around in circles with this heavily armed unit following him until they wore themselves out, and then the little unit attacked him and beat him.
	It's a number of different simple tactics I have.
	I make this book so people can understand what goes through the mind of people that are on the battlefield, because if things go crazy, which they're already crazy, but if they get...
	To have civil unrest, you're going to have to use things like this to defeat and hold your area to keep them from burning your house down.
	First, they'll ask for food, then they'll demand food, then they'll kick your door down, and in the process, probably kill you and your family and turn your family and you into toast.
	Burning your house down, you know?
	And you've had experience with that and with the Marxists in Africa and things like that.
	And certainly, you know, the other books that you've got there, the subtitle of that one was The Slaver's Wheel.
	The subtitle was The Green Beret's Story.
	It was classified mission in Africa.
	It's very interesting in the Congo.
	Very interesting to see these stories there as well.
	But that's where you draw your experience from.
	We're talking about the college stuff.
	He says, yeah, when you pay those expensive tuition fees in college, you're literally buying into the propaganda.
	They're going to have it away with you.
	Everybody is pushing towards war now, it seems like.
	And the Europeans, even as there's talk about peace in Ukraine, they don't want to have it.
	Zelensky is saying he doesn't want to have it.
	And Europe, of course, is pushing on that.
	And the Trump administration continues to push them to rearm.
	Germany is talking about spending well over a trillion dollars, which is so out of character for Germany.
	They've been so jealous of statutes.
	We used to always have the Germans screaming about the Weimar.
	Republican hyperinflation.
	And we saw what happened when they went into massive debt and built a massive They need a lot more than that.
	I don't know where this war thing is going to go.
	Your listeners should know I went through nuclear weapons training when I was in the American Air Force.
	And I actually was the one in my squadron with the most electronics training.
	So yours truly was sitting on top of the W-40 thermonuclear bomb with my butt right on the thing.
	Like Slim Pickens.
	And arming and disarming the thing.
	Yeah, well, I didn't have a cowboy hat, but...
	Let's make sure you don't hit the release door on it.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	No, this thing was in a shelter.
	It was in a missile shelter.
	And so I went through training on the MAD doctrine, which MAD stands for, M-A-D, stands for Mutual Assured Destruction.
	Absolute lunacy.
	I got depressed from it.
	I couldn't think about anything else for the longest time and how crazy it would be.
	Now, nuclear war is still a strong possibility.
	I go through in my book how to survive it.
	It's quite simple.
	There's two rules you go by.
	The 7-10 rule and the inverse square rule.
	I'm not going to explain them, but in the book it tells you simply what you have to do.
	It is survivable.
	People think that every nuclear explosion is like Chernobyl.
	It's going to be forever.
	It is not going to be forever.
	It's going to burn off.
	Where I live in the Southwest, if they bombed Los Angeles, by the time that gets to my house, fallout, it would be one-tenth of...
	The amount of radiation coming off.
	You can protect.
	It's very survivable.
	You don't need gas masks, Geiger counters, all this stuff.
	It's quite easy to survive against it, but we're possibly, depending, I don't know, the Europeans don't have very much as far as any military.
	They sent all their stuff to Ukraine for the Russians to destroy.
	With drones, yeah.
	For the most part, they take low-tech drones and wipe out the expensive tanks.
	A $200 drone, they destroy a $50 million tank, you know.
	And it shows the fallacy of American military equipment.
	You know, we spend 10 times as much for something that doesn't work.
	And the other side spends one-tenth of what we spend.
	And they've got very effective weapons.
	Yes. Yes, that's true.
	Yeah, they need your book in Europe.
	We need to get the word out to them.
	As a matter of fact, I've got a lot of people who bought the coin all over the world.
	Everybody needs to have this book.
	And you put it out in a two-volume book, and it's physical.
	Because that's really key.
	And a lot of these disasters, people are not going to have internet service.
	I mean, we just saw that in Western North Carolina with other places like that where the natural disaster comes.
	Even if it's a natural disaster, usually you don't have electricity.
	So it's good to have that.
	It's good to have that knowledge.
	It's good to set up those skills, to have those relationships in place before something happens.
	Yes, and I tell people in the front of the book to get a large...
	Ziploc bag, throw a candle and some matches in there because you might be reading by candlelight.
	I put the book in large font so it's easy to read in low-light conditions.
	And, you know, there's trouble coming.
	People need to do one thing, and that's store food and store water.
	And that's the biggest thing that I talk about to people is storing food and water and life-sustaining medicines.
	I've got huge amounts of material in the book as far as surviving a gun battle.
	Again, your readers should know that I was in a foreign legion anti-terrorist unit in a guerrilla war in Africa for two and a half years.
	I put my experiences, and I didn't survive because I was a good soldier.
	I call, I've got a story I've got to tell you about a little later, but I've got stories in the book just to break it up.
	One of them is my excellent black African chef, and he was a guy in my commando unit, and it's just...
	It blows me away when I think back of that, how many times the good Lord pulled me out.
	And I didn't think it back then, but like a friend of mine said the other day, he said, Lawson, you?
	Two Bible study groups?
	What's going on?
	And I go to some.
	They're combat veterans.
	I really enjoy these people.
	I don't even know if I like some of them, but I trust every one of them to watch my back.
	And I'm just astounded by what is in the good book.
	This is my second read.
	The first one went on when my mom told me to go to Sunday school with the threat of waterboarding me if I didn't, you know.
	Anyway. I gotta divert and tell you something that happened.
	Sure. My mother-in-law was in...
	My wife is from Africa.
	She's British.
	A place called Rhodesia, which is Zimbabwe now.
	We got her mother out of there.
	Her father died.
	And we got her to South Africa.
	She lived there for four years.
	Then that started going down the toilet.
	And it's just, I think Trump said, used the word shite hole.
	Anyway, that's what they are.
	It's just absolutely, they've destroyed the country.
	Not because they're black, because the communists are running things.
	That's right, yeah.
	And it's just putting undue pressure and suffering on...
	Both black and white over there.
	And of course the communists always love to divide and conquer.
	They'll divide you by economic class or they'll do it by race.
	And so that is really what they're working on.
	And same thing here.
	Absolutely. So we get my mother-in-law, six years ago, we get her to the United States and we get her, we sponsor her, which we're allowed to do.
	And we get her over here.
	Now you have to understand the British.
	I've often said Americans make good citizens, British make good subjects.
	Because it's the bottom line.
	She's British.
	She's a beautiful woman in her mid-80s.
	Aerobics instructor, very fit.
	Two years ago, she got all the COVID shots.
	Because the government said, get the COVID shots.
	And the Brits do pretty much what the government tells you to do.
	They're very compliant with the government.
	They believe that they got their best interests in mind, which anybody that's taken history class apparently failed it if they think the government's going to do anything good for you.
	Let me interject here.
	There was an excellent animated film I remember back in the 1980s or 90s called When the Wind Blows.
	And it was this animated film, and this British couple...
	And it's a nuclear war, and they're going by the government's handout as to what's going to happen.
	And so throughout this whole thing, they're so incredibly naive, and you're watching them slowly die because everything the government told them to do was wrong.
	But yeah, when you say they'll follow the government, whatever the government says, make me think of that if people have not seen that.
	Yeah, that's exactly what they do.
	They do that in just about everything.
	My mother-in-law over here, and she stays between our house and the other sister, my wife's sister's house.
	We give her living quarters.
	We feed her, take care of her.
	And she got all the COVID shots because they said to get the COVID shots.
	And then all of a sudden, her toes started turning black.
	We took her in.
	I got madder than hell at her.
	I said, you're going to get gangrene?
	We took her to a doctor after three different doctors.
	Well, we don't know what it is.
	So they gave her some antibiotics.
	Coincidentally, the clots went away.
	Her toes were getting filled with blood clots.
	So she goes from that to two years later, all of her toes turned black on her right foot.
	Well, they removed them all.
	They had three vascular surgeons in there.
	They kept calling vascular surgeons in because I think they knew what was going on.
	It was a result.
	One of them finally told us this, but it was the COVID vaccine.
	Yeah. So then they took her right toes off.
	Then they took her left toes off.
	They started turning black.
	Then the next thing we knew, two months later, they removed her right leg up to mid-thigh.
	And then another month later, they removed her left leg all the way to her hip.
	The fear was gangrene from the clots.
	And my wife and I know exactly what it is.
	But now, we got a call yesterday.
	They're going to take her right hand off.
	You know, it's so upsetting because this woman, it's like she's being tortured.
	She is probably, and people out there that have...
	Mother-in-laws, guys like me that don't like them, she's the perfect mother-in-law.
	She's my little Jewish princess.
	Even though she's older than me, I love her.
	She's so polite.
	We've got her in an assisted living home now, but I don't know how much of this stuff is going on in the country.
	Finally, we had a doctor say it's caused by the COVID.
	I suppose he could get fired for that, but like Robert Kennedy Jr. says, we need to have a national discussion on this thing.
	It's people, the doctors are deathly afraid to say anything.
	Well, he needs to stop it.
	He's in a position now where he could stop it.
	You know, we don't need any more data.
	We need somebody who's going to take action on it.
	He needs to do something to stop that.
	It's just unconscionable.
	Yeah, I guess there's people out there in universities and institutions that are still telling you to go out and get a COVID, get the 10th vaccine.
	This is absolute insanity.
	We've had friends die from it, 33 years old, weightlifters, fit, all of a sudden, go to bed on Tuesday night, Wednesday morning, they're room temperature.
	Don't smoke, don't drink, don't take any drugs, legal or illegal.
	They die of a heart attack.
	How often did that happen before?
	Now they're having kids in school, in high school and even younger, have to take electrocardiograms in order to be able to participate.
	That's never happened before.
	And, you know, this has been going on for the longest time.
	It's just watching this roll out in slow motion, and nobody has the courage to stand up and do anything about it in government.
	And it appears to be that they have to essentially take an oath of loyalty to the pharmaceutical companies in order to get any kind of position in there.
	So what happened with the one guy, Dave Walden, they replaced him now with somebody who is – She's got deep connections into the intelligence stuff.
	So, yeah, people have to do this on their own.
	Yeah, this is so upsetting.
	My wife has been crying here all day.
	You know, what's my mother-in-law going to end up with?
	No arms, no legs?
	It's just horrible.
	It's atrocious.
	I don't know if you know anything about this.
	I read something to the effect.
	One of the whistleblowers from a pharmaceutical company that was involved in making these vaccines says that at the end of 2025, there's going to be a cascading mass of people dying.
	He said there's some kind of time clock.
	What do you know about that?
	I don't know, but I know when you're talking about blood clots and things like that, because I have AFib and there's a chance of that.
	I don't want to take the pharmaceutical anticoagulants and things like that, and I don't know with these clots if it would be successful, because a lot of these clots, when they have done autopsies, you know, they find that it's this white...
	Fibrous stuff, but there are some things out there like lumbrokinase and natokinase that are natural anticoagulants that I don't know if that would help or not, but I'm not a doctor, but that's the kind of stuff that I take instead of taking their really dangerous pharmaceutical anticoagulants because they always have some horrific side effect.
	Since we last talked to you, one of my sons was given an incredibly dangerous concentrated antibiotic when he had an issue.
	It could have given him something like azithromycin.
	Instead, they gave him this fluorochloroquinalone, and it's a phloxan poison that has been going back to Cipro.
	It's been going on for decades, and the FDA won't do anything to stop it.
	And so, you know, he was bedridden for cancer.
	Yeah, it's...
	They've been bought off.
	The whole thing is our money going to people that are running things like the FDA.
	They go from there to be a board director for $2 million a year.
	They've got all kinds of plants to get in the agency they left.
	All kinds of contacts of authority.
	Basically, they're a conduit to get things done that...
	Shouldn't be done.
	That's right.
	I say that FDA stands for free to do anything.
	Rather than regulating these companies, they leave them free to do anything they wish, make money, and then, hey, when I get out of this position, I'll join you.
	Which is what we saw happen with the previous heads of the FDA under Trump.
	You know, both of them, one of them goes to Moderna, the other one goes to Pfizer.
	They greased all that stuff.
	So, yeah, it's bad.
	Yeah, I strongly recommend any of your listeners.
	That are inclined to think that this COVID vaccine, a tenth booster, is going to do them any good.
	Do not get them.
	I've read that there's some type of nanobot they're coming out with.
	God only knows what that's going to do with your body, but it's supposed to clear the spike proteins from your body.
	I don't know.
	I'm not a doctor either, but I am getting very...
	Disturbed with what I feel is a lack of ethics.
	Literally a lack of morals in the medical community.
	Oh, it's gone.
	It's just horrible.
	You know, I had questions about this from the very beginning.
	I just played a clip this last week of an RN who is suffering from this, and her body is still producing the spike protein 1,500 days later.
	And I said that from the very beginning.
	I said, you know, when Moderna comes, Trump sets them up.
	In a little presentation, how long is it going to take you?
	No, that's too long.
	Well, I can do it faster.
	No, that's still too long.
	And he finally gets to the other guys at the end where he's got this all programmed out.
	And they say, well, we can do it right now.
	We can turn your body into a vaccine manufacturing facility.
	And so when I looked at the way they described the way this thing worked, I said, how do you turn this off?
	Well, it turns out you don't.
	And so that's one of the key issues that's happening with it.
	And you go back and look at Deagle.com.
	I mean, these people have this stuff all planned out, I think.
	Yeah, they're coming out with a lot of injectables to replace medicines, at least the VA is, and I refuse to take them.
	I know if I have an adverse reaction to a pill they give me, I can quit taking it that day.
	But once you get two weeks of the pill in you, How do you get it out of your body if you're having a problem with it, you know?
	That's right.
	And all the stuff that they do is just getting more and more concentrated.
	I mean, even like the antibiotics that are there on Rumble.
	I have Mav2022 says one of my best friends just dropped dead on a Zoom call because of those clots.
	Wow. It truly is amazing.
	But, you know, when you're talking about...
	Yeah, go ahead.
	No, we'll see where this goes, but the insanity is still out there.
	Yeah. I've got an African-American friend because I was in Zimbabwe, and she's from there.
	And this is how crazy things are getting.
	She put a comment about it's good to see Doge and Elon Musk finding out all of the money that's literally been stolen from people.
	The next thing is, she gets a comment from somebody that had an Asian-Indian-sounding name.
	And they said, they apparently looked into her Facebook account and found out she was from Africa.
	And this comment was, well, go back to Africa and take Elon Musk with you.
	And so she got mad.
	This is unsolicited.
	It's just provocative.
	And she said, assuming this lady was from India, well, why don't you go back to India?
	You're not wanted here.
	So the next thing is, the person that put the provocative statement deleted it so you couldn't see it.
	Found out where this woman worked.
	Got a hold of her company.
	Her boss fired her.
	They fired her before they talked to her.
	So she had a She said, you don't even know.
	You're only getting half the story.
	So anyway, the long and short of it is she went to another company.
	They hired her.
	They said, you know, we've got another person that had the exact same thing happen to them.
	They just went to work here.
	And it was a Muslim woman.
	And so this got to be a real circus.
	And I told her, I said, you know, I close my Facebook account.
	Get your stuff back.
	Get off of it.
	And it's just gotten to be, I call it, you know, maybe this isn't something you agree with, but I call it Satan's computer system.
	It literally antagonizes people to the point that after this happened, I'm talking to another author, Matt Bracken down in Florida.
	I talked to him for an hour and a half last Sunday.
	And he's an expert on this.
	Because he's been suspended or kicked off everybody's website.
	And he said, Jack, that is a bot.
	I said, what do you mean?
	He said, they are paying people to go out and send these bots out.
	They aren't even human.
	But they have a human overseer, and they're just trying to stir up as much trouble.
	He said, left-wing lunatics.
	Again, the inmates are running the asylum.
	Well, and it's only going to get worse because we're going to have artificial intelligence that's going to go out and make these determinations about you based on your content that's on social media.
	And they will label or stigmatize you.
	And it won't just be that.
	It'll be geospatial intelligence that they've been working on since the late 1990s, the fastest growing part of intelligence, where they look at your patterns and other things like that, just like they did the people who were in Washington, D.C. on January the 6th.
	They put a geofence around that.
	But they can look at that and collate that.
	With their surveillance techniques, and they can determine what your politics are, what your religion is, and all the rest of this stuff.
	And if they don't like it, then they can come after you.
	That's going to be the world that we're going to live in.
	And that's going to be an essential part of preparation and survival as well.
	That's going to be, I guess, what we call that information awareness.
	Because they want total information awareness, so we have to be aware of what information they want to get from us, right?
	One of my friends used to be one of the big mucky muck directors of Department of Homeland Services, and he was telling me about the surveillance they were doing back, well, he quit in 2019.
	He said the things that were going on there, he just didn't want to stay there anymore.
	Oh, yeah.
	He said they were bordering on being treasonous.
	Yes. Oh, I think they passed that border a long time ago.
	In my estimation, yeah.
	Things are just going further down.
	Surveillance, he said, is beyond your comprehension.
	And he said, I quit six years ago.
	And he said, I don't even know what it's like now.
	But this is going to move from a keyboard or AI to the Tesla, it's gone, and to the streets at some point.
	This is far from over.
	These people are not going to give up, and they've got a lot of money behind them.
	I often wonder how much this money has disappeared.
	It's sitting in slush funds.
	I know one Baptist group, it was a church group, and I'm not beating up on Baptists, but they got a $10.7 million grant.
	I guess the money's just given to them.
	And four years later, after the Biden administration, Group had over $800 million in a slush fund.
	How much of that is going on in the country?
	Somebody's funding this stuff, even though Trump's cutting it off.
	The fact that he cuts it off, I don't know.
	Do they need congressional approval?
	Where is this going to go?
	Is it going to stay cut off?
	Well, you know, you just had a situation like that.
	It was charitable aid that was being spent by Samaritan Ministries.
	That's Franklin Graham's thing.
	And they were supposed to be reimbursed by USAID, which I've always thought is just synonymous with the CIA, because it is.
	But anyway, a judge comes back and says, no, you can't cut that funding.
	And so then they were able to get that money.
	That money was not going to go to them, and then that became a news story.
	But here's the thing.
	You know, a lot of people want to excuse what Trump did.
	They'll always say, well, he didn't do it.
	It was the governors who did it.
	No, he paid them to do it.
	And that's the way the presidents always operate.
	They don't want to give a direct order because people will challenge that in court with the 10th Amendment.
	So what they do is they bribe and they blackmail people for the money.
	So it's amazing to me to see that these judges are pulling back Trump not spending money, right?
	That's the kind of interest.
	Congress can allocate the money, but the executive does not have to spend it.
	Trump has used it as a weapon to spend or to not spend.
	Obama has done the same thing.
	Biden has done that.
	They all do that.
	They all say, well, I'm going to cut off your Title IX funding if you don't put the boys in the girls' bathroom.
	They all do that.
	And yet now you've got these judges out there saying that you have to give the money out on USAID.
	It's crazy.
	Or they put an order out.
	Send the two astronauts back into space.
	The two they just rescued.
	It's absolute lunacy.
	I think they need to close some of these judge ships and just shut them down.
	I can't believe they've got that many judges that are supposed to be impartial that are so political.
	But that's the point in the case.
	I'd like to go over a couple of things.
	Sure. As far as this book, my number one preaching point, again, is store food and water.
	Store life-sustainable medicines.
	I've got a list of things.
	If people go to that, they can look into it.
	It's what I call my new home for the Civil Defense Manual, jacklawsonbooks.com.
	But I would like people to look at what is in the Civil Defense Manual.
	Yes. I think they'll find literally the A to Z of survival.
	If you know what's in this book, and you can get the cooperation of your neighbors, or as I know some people have their own private security force, and that is this.
	They run into like-minded people, young guys, most of them looking for Afghan and Iraqi vets.
	And they say, bring your wife, your girlfriend, your kids, whatever.
	Bring them to our house.
	You're going to have to sleep in the floor, but we'll have food and water for you.
	And they pile enough food up to where they can take care of four or five different people.
	The point that I make in my book, which is a...
	Cast in stone.
	I don't recommend people going out and going remote.
	That's just asking for problems.
	I'll liken it to this.
	People got to think the last time they went camping with their kids and they got out there and what they forgot, which was just about everything.
	And the long and short of the thing is, if people go remote, there's another thing.
	Wherever they go, there's going to be some people close by.
	Eventually these people who are living out there because they don't want to be around people are going to see this family that's out there as nothing but rodents.
	Potentially they're going to be over to their house asking for food and water.
	And they're eventually going to probably try to take it.
	Now outside of storing food in a house and staying in your neighborhood...
	Which I advocate.
	You have way more resources in your neighborhood.
	And so you're talking about this in terms of, you know, somebody has a bug out bag.
	And, you know, they've got maybe some remote location that they hardly ever go to.
	And so, you know, something happens.
	Maybe if it's a natural disaster, that's a good plan.
	But if it's, you know, something else, that's not necessarily a good plan because there's a lot of risk on the travel as well as once they get there, they don't know anybody, right?
	Point is, David.
	How are you going to get out of some of these metro areas?
	You're not going to be able to get out of there.
	That's right.
	Las Vegas police did a study.
	I told you about this once before.
	They randomly stopped 1,000 vehicles.
	Unless somebody was really impaired, they knew they were drinking or they were on drugs.
	They didn't do anything to them.
	But they did one thing and one thing only.
	How much gas you got in your car?
	And they came up with those 1,000 cars at an average of three-eighths.
	Of one tank.
	A little over a quarter of a tank of gasoline.
	Now, you're going to go out of town 100 miles.
	How far are you going to get before the freeway looks like a parking lot from people running out of gas, cars breaking down, general traffic.
	We had an experience.
	How are you going to get to your bug out location?
	You're not!
	We had an experience with that.
	We went up just before Thanksgiving once, and we were going up to Niagara Falls, and so we were going through Buffalo, where they have a lot of snow, and they had a record snowfall for a 24-hour period, and it happened all at once.
	And so even though the people there have a lot of snow removal equipment, even though they're experienced with it, and even though you've got a lot of people who've got four-wheel drive SUVs or whatever, The roads got blocked.
	It just took one person who was like, oh, it's coming down really fast, I've got to get home.
	They get stuck because they've got a little tiny car.
	Then another person with a little tiny car gets stuck.
	And before you know it, the road was completely...
	We got stuck in that situation.
	We eventually got out of it because we picked up a guy who lived there.
	And he took us through some back roads and stuff like that.
	But I saw how quickly that happened, not because of gas, but because they didn't have the appropriate car to be.
	Well, say you do get out of the city.
	You've got your bug out bag.
	72-hour bag, a lot of people call it.
	What are you going to do after 72 hours?
	You can maybe stretch that bag out if you have the discipline in the family to five or six days.
	But that's about it.
	Then you're going to be looking for water, and you're going to be looking for food.
	And like I put in a civil defense manual, treating water.
	You're going to look at water that looks like it's out of some kind of a beer commercial.
	It's so clear, crystal clear, but you drink it, it's going to be like some water I drank in Africa that had a dead monkey in it.
	I didn't know it had a dead monkey in it until one of the guys removed the pump cover.
	Or the float cover from the thing.
	And I wish I hadn't drank it.
	The black guys with me, they're all peachy because they're used to drinking stuff like that.
	Me, I won't tell you the story.
	It was ghastly.
	But what happened to me the next couple days?
	And it took me over a month to get rid of this.
	It was maybe dysentery.
	So the water is going to be an issue.
	The food's going to be an issue.
	You can get books.
	And I recommend people have this even if they stay in their neighborhood on wild edibles.
	I've got all this stuff in the book.
	If people go on my website and simply look at some of the free resources, I'll tell you what you have to do.
	For one thing, people have no idea how important sanitation is.
	That's what I call there's a deadly two sisters.
	That are diseases that if you don't have sanitation, and I'm not talking about taking care of your garbage, I'm talking about people's bowel movements and urination.
	It's got to be taken care of.
	You have to do it in specific places.
	It cannot get into water supplies.
	You also have to bury your cans, your containers and stuff.
	Because you've got to remember, you're out in the wild.
	You're not in your area.
	You're in wildlife jungle area, literally.
	I don't care where you go in this country.
	I can go out in the desert here, and I'm in wildlife area.
	There's coyotes out there.
	There's mountain lions out there.
	There's all kinds of issues, and they're looking for something to eat too.
	People can get a lot of this and the free resources, and I encourage people to go into jacklawsonbooks.com.
	And look at some of this stuff, read some of this stuff.
	People think everything's going to go on.
	One of my favorite pictures in my book is a picture of a beautiful subdivision and its winding street and all these picture-perfect homes.
	And the other half of the meme is an armored vehicle and three guys firing their rifles.
	And the captions say this.
	This is what normal civility looks like.
	And then it says, but this is what base humanity behavior looks like.
	The guys firing the weapons.
	We're so fortunate in this country.
	I feel like an insurance salesman trying to sell an intangible because people think, oh, turn the water, tap on, water's coming out.
	That may or may not happen if we have enough problems in this country.
	That's right.
	Yeah, you're like an insurance salesman trying to sell life insurance to a healthy 25-year-old.
	But what he doesn't know is that he's got cancer, you know?
	And there's a cancer in this country.
	Regardless of what you see happening right now...
	We know the direction that this is likely going to take, and that's the real issue.
	You're trying to sell insurance to people who are not aware that there's a really bad disease that is going around, and that's the key part of it.
	Yeah, that bad disease going around is corrupted logic circuits in people's minds, you know, the ones that are...
	But we went through this before.
	When Trump got in the last time, The survival business just went on hold with people.
	That's right.
	They weren't interested.
	This time he's in, he's changing things.
	And because he's changing things, there's going to be a pushback, and we haven't even seen it yet.
	That's right.
	Yeah. Well, you know, it's always that way whenever a Democrat gets in, everybody starts buying guns.
	And when a Republican gets in, nobody buys any guns or ammunition or things like that.
	And nothing has necessarily changed.
	And so, you know, I just saw, I didn't get to it today, but there was an article.
	That the ATF has got like a honeypot trap trying to put up a website and talking about how they're going to, hey, you want to buy this illegal item?
	And then once somebody bites on that, they come swooping in on them.
	So that kind of stuff is still going on.
	People think, oh, that isn't an issue because now Trump is in power.
	Far from it.
	It's going to take him all of four years to get rid of most of those people.
	Yeah, if he even wants to.
	Yeah, and if the Democrat or the left gets back into power, they'll fully reverse everything.
	Right away, exactly.
	Yeah, if he takes it all out by executive order, they'll put it all back in by executive order next time it comes around.
	So you better prepare as if it's not going to go away, because if any of this stuff even does go away, it'll only be temporary.
	Well, at least we haven't seen what I've seen in some countries.
	That's the car bomb.
	I've been in two places where two different countries, Northern Ireland and Rhodesia, where car bombs are set off.
	30, 40 people killed.
	And we haven't seen that.
	And we haven't.
	The biggest thing I think.
	Not yet, anyway.
	Yeah, not yet.
	The biggest Achilles heel, I believe, is our vulnerable infrastructure.
	Shoot a hole through a transformer at a power relay station.
	And you're down for the count.
	It's too much.
	I explain it in the book why this is so critical, why we also probably have a big threat with the EMP.
	At some point, Putin's probably going to call the German Prime Minister and say, hey, you know that city, Dresden, that was firebombed in World War II?
	Well, we're going to send a hypersonic missile over there with a conventional warhead, but it's going to be a big one.
	And so why don't you evacuate that city?
	If they attack and get in troops on the ground over there, that place could go up in flames again.
	I don't know what we would do as a response, but...
	Yeah. Oh, yeah.
	Well, you know, remember, it was like a day or two after Trump became president, he had that Stargate thing, right, where he brings in Larry Ellison.
	And he says, you know, our grid is really old.
	And it's very vulnerable.
	So you guys need to set up your own power plant right next, you know, your own source of power right next to your manufacturing facility.
	It's like, oh, so you're not going to do anything to fix the grid or to help its vulnerability to an EMP attacker.
	That's nice to know that you're not even interested in it.
	You're going to tell all your pals to set up their own private power source.
	But yeah, that's the way this is all going.
	And again, Anybody who trusts government, that's a real concern.
	Overall, I've said that the problem with Trump is that he put a big pacifier in everybody's mouth the first term.
	Now he's putting trust in.
	And that's the big concern.
	Well, thank you for joining us, Jack.
	We're out of time, but everybody go to jacklawsonbooks.com.
	He's got links there to take you to his sub stack.
	You can see free resources there.
	He's got other books as well.
	And Civil Defense Manual is in stock.
	And I guess they can still get there with the old email address or old website address.
	But Civil Defense Manual, one of your best resources you can find.
	Thank you so much for joining us.
	You're welcome.
	Thank you, David.
	Thank you.
	Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
	I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
	You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
	And I could, if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful gray MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue.
	But... He told me to get lost.
	Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at thedavidknightshow.com.
	You should be able to buy me several hundred.
	Those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
	I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
	If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA.

▲