Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 23, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:37

The David Knight Show - 07/23/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds You're listening to The David Night Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 23rd of July, year of our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to take a look at the aftermath of this assassination that happened.
	The director of the Secret Service kind of found herself like a fish in a barrel being shot at from all different directions, but it didn't shame her at all.
	And both Republicans and Democrats are fed up.
	With the attitude of this director calling for her to be removed.
	But we're also going to take a look at some of the policies that we can expect from a President Lala.
	And how did she get into this position?
	And why did Trump give her money?
	Oh, he pays everybody so they do what he wants, right?
	Well, we'll take a look at YouTube coming after speech.
	We'll take a look at how the globalists and large organizations are dumping big money into local elections here in Tennessee and probably in your state as well.
	It's not just the district attorney races.
	We'll be right back.
	Well I want to begin with an op-ed piece that I saw.
	Oliver Melnick at WND wrote this op-ed piece, What Kind of German Would You Have Been in the 1930s?
	And so we all look at that and we wonder, you know, would we have been the kind of person who would have stood up like Bonhoeffer, who would have gone back, who would have realized what was happening, left?
	And then said, well, I need to oppose this.
	Goes back. Is executed just a few days before the war ends.
	Dietrich Bonhoeffer.
	Or would we be like Corrie ten Boom?
	And would we shelter the people that the government was trying to kill?
	But I ask you this question.
	What kind of an American were you in 2020?
	What kind of Australian were you in 2020?
	What kind of Canadian were you in 2020?
	Or 2021?
	Or 2022? Or 2023?
	What kind of Brit were you?
	Let's just go down the list.
	Any country, any nationality.
	Did you push back against this stuff that happened to us in 2020?
	Folks, this is not a thought exercise.
	We should be triggering our memories.
	Because we watched our Constitution be flushed down the toilet in a soft, And it'll be harder each and every time.
	They will add more law enforcement thugs.
	I mean, in Australia, they got it pretty rough in many places, in Melbourne, other places like that.
	But they're going to add more muscle, more uniforms, more bulletproof vests.
	More helmeted thugs to beat you into submission with each and every one of these.
	And they're not ended because nobody has had to pay the price.
	You don't even have politicians to acknowledge that this happened.
	It's just down the memory hole.
	Jeffrey Tucker's doing some fine work at Brownstone.
	He's written a book talking about that.
	The fact that nobody wants to talk about it.
	Nobody wanted to talk about it at the Republican convention.
	Trump doesn't even talk about the vaccines he's so proud of anymore.
	They're just flushing it all down the memory hole.
	And so this guy begins, and he keeps this all in the context of the 1930s, and then also in anti-Semitism.
	He said, the masks were pulled off the faces of all anti-Semites, he said, on October 7th.
	Well, what about the masks that were put on all of us?
	Did you wear the mask? Did you push back against this?
	Did you accept the Trump mask, the mask that he was paying people from Washington to put on his health department and all the rest of them?
	Did you keep the mask on like a lot of people until it rotted off your face, until it broke out and pimples all over your face?
	Do you realize that mask was the same act of submission that a yellow star was under Hitler?
	Or do you stand up?
	He says, people of goodwill, and Christians in particular, are at a crossroads.
	We cannot remain silent in the face of evil.
	If you believe in God, you have to believe in evil as well.
	Let me just add, this is not because it's some kind of yin-yang.
	There's not some kind of an equivalence here.
	No. No equivalence.
	But it's simply because the Bible says it.
	God's Word says it so.
	That's it. That ends it.
	And so, what do you believe?
	Are you going to act on those beliefs?
	Would you be the kind of German who would help Jews in the 1930s and 40s?
	Would you be the kind of German who did not raise his hand in a Sieg Heil?
	Remember that picture? They eventually got that guy.
	Everybody around him, big sea of people, and they're all Sieg Heil.
	And he's got this expression on his face and his hands down, I hope that was you.
	You see, we don't live just for this short period of time in this life.
	And the only people who change things are the people who have the spine to stand up.
	And so, what about Corrie Ten Boom?
	Well, her whole family paid a big price, didn't they?
	She paid a price. Everybody else in her family died.
	They sent them off to the concentration camps as well when they caught them, protecting innocent life.
	Does she have any regrets?
	No. Did her father or her sister, any of them have any regrets?
	No. Why?
	They're Christians. They're there to do the right thing and leave the consequences to God.
	The largest study of its kind has found excess deaths during the pandemic were caused by public health response, not the virus.
	Think about that.
	You know, we've talked about how Well, you know, they could just point a finger at somebody.
	At the beginning of this, the hospitals were told by CMS that was doling out the money from Washington, you don't have to do a test, you just do a clinical diagnosis.
	And then in August, there was an aha moment.
	The American Hospital Association, aha!
	When I saw that in August of 2020, I started talking about that.
	I've not seen anybody else really talk about the 20% bonus that was given to all the hospitals to do everything that Fauci wanted.
	Checks signed by Donald Trump.
	But you just had to point at somebody and say, wait a minute, you're telling us that we need to have a test now?
	You told us that you didn't have enough tests?
	And the ones that you had didn't work anyway, so just do a clinical diagnosis and now you're not going to pay us?
	No honor among thieves and murderers, I guess.
	But, you know, that was part of it.
	Just point at somebody, and then you get the money.
	If you can put them on a ventilator, you diagnose them, point at them, $13,000.
	Yeah, it's cold.
	I'm sure that's COVID. I'm sure that's COVID. $13,000.
	Another $39,000 if you can put them on an invasive ventilator that Peter Navarro helped and bragged about manufacturing this thing.
	That guy belongs in prison for more than four months.
	He was speaking at the RNC, saying, I'm saving this country for you.
	I'm laying myself down as a sacrifice.
	No, you did more to destroy this country than pretty much anybody I can imagine.
	All of you people in the Trump administration.
	And all the Democrats as well.
	You see, it was bipartisan.
	It's one of the reasons why nobody is admitting what they did.
	And so, yeah, you put somebody on a ventilator and kill them, and they'll give you $39,000.
	Just one patient. And even before you get to charge for the daily use, even before you get your 20% bonus, you've already made a $3,000 profit.
	So, it was shameless murder for hire.
	That's what it was.
	Financially incentivized malpractice, but it goes beyond that.
	This study shows that it was the lockdown that was killing people, right from the very beginning.
	This story is a children's health defense.
	It said excess mortality in 125 countries.
	They looked at the entire world here.
	Stemmed from the public health establishment's response, including mandates and lockdowns that caused severe stress, harmful medical interventions, the COVID vaccines, denial of treatment, Do not resuscitate orders, and on and on and on.
	They said, we conclude that nothing special would have occurred in terms of mortality had a pandemic not been declared.
	There's always the response to this.
	And notice that all of the governments did exactly the same thing at the same time.
	Don't tell me this wasn't a conspiracy.
	It's just a coincidence that every country on earth is doing the same thing at the same time and telling you, well, you know, in a couple months we're going to do the next step.
	It's not an emergency.
	It's not a response to an emergency if you're planning this step by step.
	If you're doing it from the inside, as Fauci said, if you're doing it with disruption and you're doing it iteratively, it is not an emergency response.
	And so, why was this pandemic declared?
	Well, because Trump's big pharma owners told him to do that.
	You see, when he gives the money to Lala Harris, he says, yeah, I give money to everybody.
	And they come around and they kiss my behind, he says.
	A little bit more crassly.
	Crass. Close to the term he used.
	So... I said this from the very beginning with Trump.
	I said when he, and he mentioned this back in 2016, I gave money to all these people.
	Get them to do what I want.
	I said, do you remember that in the Godfather where the Godfather, Marlon Brando, says all my life I've paid these politicians, they're going to pay us that type of thing.
	We're going to get you in this position or something.
	That's what he's doing.
	He's tired of paying off the politicians.
	He wants people to pay him for favors.
	And that's what he's getting. What do you think he's going to do for Elon Musk for $180 million?
	Pharma got him a lot cheaper than that.
	A lot cheaper.
	Researchers from the Canadian nonprofit Correlation Research in the Public Interest and the University of Quebec Analyzed excess all-cause mortality data prior to and during the so-called pandemic.
	Beginning with the March 11th World Health Organization pandemic declaration and ending on May 5th, 2023, when the WHO declared the pandemic over.
	You see, the mystery has been solved.
	It is a whodunit.
	It was the WHO that done it.
	The WHO done it back on March 11th.
	And the WHO ended what they had done on 2020.
	They ended it in May of 2023.
	But it's a WHO done it.
	Like I said many times, it's an Agatha Christie novel.
	Murder on the Warp Speed Express.
	Every one of these dirty politicians, and every one of these countries, at every level, from the federal to the state to the local, We're good to go.
	The researchers also use the baseline rates to investigate how the individual country variations in excess death rates correlate to different pandemic-related interventions, including things like vaccination and booster campaigns.
	In some countries, mortality spikes occurred before the vaccines were rolled out.
	Yeah, kill people with a ventilator, kill people with a remdesivir.
	While in other places, mortality spikes tracked closely with vaccine or booster campaigns.
	They established that there was significant excess mortality worldwide between March 11, 2020 and May 5, 2023.
	You see, even just, not even giving somebody a ventilator, not even giving them remdesivir, but denying treatment.
	You know, we had empty hospitals because they refused to treat people.
	Well, people die, and so then, well, that's got to be COVID, not COVID. The medical people doing that, right?
	No, it wasn't medical people.
	The variations in excess all-cause mortality rates across space and time, wrote the authors, quote, allow us to conclude that the COVID period, 2020 to 2023, excess all-death mortality around the world is incompatible with a pandemic viral respiratory disease as a primary cause of death.
	Because what does that look like?
	You know, whenever we've seen an epidemic of something, it had a curve on it.
	Remember the curve? Remember the flattened curve stuff?
	Goes back to 1840.
	Farr's law. He noticed that, you know, these outbreaks typically happen in a bell-shaped curve.
	And so we've got to flatten that curve.
	Yeah. Except, just like, you know, we have to have herd immunity.
	Well, it wasn't about people getting vaccinated.
	That was why the curve went that way.
	But, you know, so they stopped talking about the curve.
	They stopped talking about flattening it.
	They stopped talking about herd immunity.
	Those are just tricks that they use to scare you to get you vaccinated.
	The idea that vaccines saved lives is ridiculous, they say.
	Rancourt and his team cited several factors they believe disproved the theory that the virus caused a spike in all-cause mortality.
	For example, they wrote that excess mortality surged almost simultaneously across several continents when the pandemic was declared, even though nobody was dying, even though in the places where they said, oh, look, we've had a pandemic in China, and we know that because they lock people down.
	We're talking about a communist government here.
	That's what communist governments do.
	And so, you know, even they didn't have a large body count.
	But, of course, we lock everybody in the world down, even when there's no deaths in the United States.
	The big pharma guy that Trump put in charge of HHS declared a pandemic at the end of January.
	There were no comparable surges in areas that had not yet declared a pandemic.
	Because it wasn't a virus.
	It was politicians' policies that kill people.
	You think policies don't matter?
	You think it's only about the person?
	Well, if that were true, wouldn't we want to find some person that's got character and integrity?
	Don't see any of them on the ballot.
	Not at all.
	That's not a choice. Well, let's go back to the issues and principles.
	Does that matter?
	They killed people.
	It's always killing people.
	The researchers always also found a lot of variability in death rates within countries over time, which also would not be an expected outcome if those deaths were caused by a pathogen.
	Yeah, you would have the clave, right?
	Yeah. They found no systematic or statistically significant trends showing that vaccination campaigns reduced all-cause mortality.
	Indeed, they found that in many places there was no excess mortality until the vaccines rolled out.
	And we knew this right away as well.
	We had a woman, a scientist, I don't remember her name, but she did this similar study just on the vaccines.
	And it was in early 2021, and she looked at countries in all around the world, European countries, Central American countries, South American countries, Africa, Asia, you name it.
	And, you know, Mongolia was a good example.
	Nobody's sick at all.
	And then they bring the vaccines in, all of a sudden, mortality spikes up.
	And then they brought in, it's either ivermectin or HCQ, and they went back down again.
	That's why she was putting out that research.
	But of course, we weren't allowed to have that.
	That's why it's so important, you know, we look at, again, I'm going to talk about what's going on in Tennessee with local elections.
	If you don't pay attention to local elections, people like Soros are going to steal it from you.
	They're going to make sure they've got their people in place the next time around.
	And they're going to have their way with you.
	Because you see, in Tennessee, they had some good people like Senator Nicely, who pushed back against these COVID mandates, who got ivermectin, introduced a bill to get ivermectin available as over-the-counter.
	No, got to get people like that out.
	Can't have them here. Let's get the Walmart family, the Walton family, okay?
	Let's get the Walton Family Foundation that works with the Aspen people.
	Let's run a candidate against these types of people.
	And let's give them massive amounts of money.
	If you structurally change the society by preventing people from moving, from breathing, from working, from having their lives, having to stay at home, locking them in, if you do all these incredibly huge changes, structural changes in society, that is going to introduce biological stress.
	There is very compelling scientific evidence that biological stress is a massive killer.
	See, just lockdown by itself.
	But it also kills the constitution.
	And so, you know, when you look at this, look, anybody can make a mistake.
	And we have a lot of people, especially I've known several people who, church leaders, pastors, said, yeah, we got it wrong.
	And they've said that privately to me.
	They've said it publicly. We got it wrong.
	Never going to do that again. Learned our lesson.
	Fine. That's what life is for.
	We go through life and God gives us challenges and tests and Many times we fail them.
	You know, the purpose of a test, if you've got a student there, it's not really so much for the teacher to know what the student knows.
	And so the student can understand what they don't know.
	And so that's why a lot of this stuff happens.
	And so we should be willing to move on and forgive people who did the wrong thing if, if.
	They are not still actively involved in the deception if they are not trying to cover up what they did to people.
	You see, if they did that, they're part of the problem.
	If they did that, they're dangerous.
	If they did that, they're still in the middle of committing a crime, in my opinion.
	And they need to be opposed, whoever they are.
	I don't care if it's Trump.
	I don't care if it's Alex Jones.
	I don't care who it is. They've got to be opposed if they're still pushing these types of lies.
	And so... You know, that's where we are at this point.
	It's the lockdown stuff. And all the Republicans and the Republican media just wants to, you know, whitewash this and move on and pretend that none of this stuff happened, as you just saw at the Republican National Convention.
	That's what should outrage you.
	You know, we've got all kinds of conspiracy theories about what the Secret Service did or didn't do.
	Was there a lone shooter who was enabled by incompetence and DEI? Was it a conspiracy by the Biden people?
	Was it a conspiracy by the Trump people?
	Did God act in a miraculous way to save Trump's lives?
	People are caught up in all of these different things.
	But what you need to focus on is the fact that we just had a Republican convention where they just whitewashed what happened in 2020.
	What happened in 2020 even caused the results in the election.
	That's why it was so absurd after the election that these people would go to the mat for Trump, who had locked them down, who had paid state officials to kill them, and who had set up the vote-by-mail thing that rigged the elections like no other election had ever been rigged before.
	Every election has got corruption in it, to some degree.
	This was the most we have seen, without a doubt.
	And yet, who put it there?
	They can't bring themselves to address the causes of all this, which means that they're going to cause it again.
	The authors also pointed to extensive evidence showing that medical interventions, including denial of treatment, caused premature death.
	The denial of antibiotics, the denial of ivermectin, the systematic use of mechanical ventilators, which by themselves would kill people.
	Peter Navarro, you hero of the RNC. Experimental treatment protocols, new palliative medications and overdoses, isolation of vulnerable people.
	All these encouraged, and they also encouraged voluntary or involuntary suicide.
	Again, the case that is going to be heard this fall about Grace, Grace Shara, and the fact that they put her on a do-not-resuscitate thing.
	In defiance of the family, they isolated these people from their family, wouldn't let the family be in the hospital, and literally killed her.
	Literally killed her. And that's going to be heard in the case.
	It's an important case.
	Because this is not about malpractice.
	This is about, the judge said, we will listen to whether or not they decided they wanted to murder her by putting a do not resuscitate tag.
	17 million excess deaths tied to the COVID vaccines.
	You know, everybody is really upset about the Holocaust.
	What are you going to say about that? Are you going to deny the Holocaust?
	Are you going to deny the body count of 6 million, all the rest of the stuff?
	People fight both sides over this stuff all the time.
	And you can't call something a Holocaust without getting them upset.
	Well, let's take a look at something that caused three times, three times the number of deaths.
	Is it okay because it was done to everybody?
	Or is it three times worse?
	I think it's three times worse.
	And I think we know who did it.
	Trump and Biden.
	And of course, you know, Lala Harris and all that.
	These, we're talking about Trump and Biden.
	It's the collective group of them.
	It's their owners.
	It's the people who pay them.
	They get all of this that they want.
	So yeah, what did you do?
	When they, you call it whatever you want.
	What'd you do when the pandemic holocaust came?
	When 17 million people were killed?
	What'd you do about that?
	30% of the countries that they analyzed had no excess deaths until the Trump shots were sent there.
	Significant correlation between the Trump shot rollout and peaks and increases in excess all-cause mortality.
	Listen to this.
	97% of countries showed a late 2021 or early 2022 peak in excess all-cause mortality temporarily associated with booster rollouts.
	In other words, coming at the same time.
	Just like One America, the health insurance company.
	They said, you know, we haven't seen anything like this in 200 years.
	This is more than three standard deviations away from the mean.
	They're insurance people.
	They know what to expect.
	You know, this is crazy.
	And he says, and even though they say these are people who did not die from COVID, oh, why did they die from?
	He says, well, I know they say they didn't die from COVID, but I know better.
	I know they died from COVID. And furthermore, I know that nobody dies from COVID if they're vaccinated.
	Oh, you know all that stuff?
	We talk about biases and lies.
	It's all over the place.
	And so he says, therefore, you know, the problem is unvaccinated people, we need to raise their rates.
	And of course, the insurance industry, I didn't know it at the time, how hard and the kind of financial pressure that insurance companies put on pediatricians, for example, to vaccinate children 90 times by the time they start school.
	Over and over and over again with the same vaccine so they can make money.
	And if you don't do that, and they look at the statistics for your practice, they derate what they pay you.
	And it can put somebody out of business if they're a pediatrician, if they don't vaccinate people.
	That's all coming from the insurance company.
	Same people like that One America executive lying about that.
	Lying about that. Well, I know that everybody says it's not from COVID. It's not a respiratory.
	But I know it is. I know it is.
	And I know that you're not going to die unless you get there.
	All of that stuff. He's just pushing an agenda.
	He's just making it up. It's not science.
	It's not statistics or math, which is the way they used to run their business.
	Vulnerability factors like the age of those vaccinated.
	See, that's our solution to the Social Security problem.
	Let's just kill the elderly.
	Other sociological factors related to the stressors on the immune system change how they are affected by vaccine toxicity of the vaccine's effects on the immune system.
	Based on their analysis and interpretations, they concluded, quote, We are compelled to state that the public health establishment and its agents fundamentally caused all the excess mortality in the COVID period.
	I am compelled to state that Trump and Biden, their money, their bureaucrats, their administrations are responsible for the shots that they sent around the world, for the shots that they pushed on Americans.
	Whether it's with bribery or blackmail or coercion.
	They're responsible.
	Responsible for creating it.
	Responsible for coercing it.
	They're responsible.
	I'm compelled to say that.
	You are compelled to say that to your neighbors.
	Don't run from the truth.
	Don't be quiet about this stuff.
	Folks, we can't pretend that this doesn't exist.
	We just can't say, well, you know, yes, I know, they're both evil, but, hey, no.
	You don't give evil a pass.
	Never. Never.
	Will Trump ever admit that the lockdown was a mistake, asked Jeffrey Tucker.
	Of course not. And he knows that.
	That's a... That's a rhetorical question.
	And he explains in his essay here why Trump will never admit that the lockdown was a mistake.
	See, the reality is the truth is going to be there someday.
	You know, just as we're looking back 100 years and saying, well, what would you have done in Nazi Germany if you were there to oppose that?
	People 100 years from now, if they are still allowed to ask questions, They will be asking, and if they're not allowed to ask questions, they'll be saying, what did people do to try to oppose this thing that we're under now?
	The Republican convention made for great television, both entertaining and exciting, infused with incredible energy after Trump's miraculous survival of an assassination attempt.
	All of this makes for wonderful drama, perfect for maximum views, public engagement in the great American sport of politics.
	It's probably too much to ask for blunt truth in such context, says Jeffrey Tucker, but there was and is one subject missing from the entire situation, and it provides the context for the rest.
	Whether it is the meltdown of trust, whether it is the inflation that is eating away purchasing power, whether it's the hard hit to household finances or the ill health or the battle between the new media and the old, practically every other symptom you can name, they all trace to the same turning point.
	That's what I've been saying for years.
	It was that Friday the 13th, 2020.
	And that's what he's saying. He said the turning point, of course, is in March 2020, about which one heard nothing at the convention.
	Nothing. And for an obvious reason.
	The turning occurred during Trump's term.
	And the policies continued and intensified under the Biden term, as I've said for the longest time.
	I refer to Benedict Donald as President Trump.
	He set the precedent for all of these things.
	It was continued by Biden.
	As you had Hulk Hogan say, the greatest professional wrestling tag team match ever.
	Trump and Vance.
	No, the greatest professional tag team match ever was Trump and Biden.
	And Don Jr.'s speech says Jeffrey...
	He says he spoke about all the ways in which the establishment has attempted to thwart his father's political fortunes.
	He said the litany is familiar, and it's true.
	We had the Russia hoax.
	We had the Ukraine phone call, the Hunter Biden laptop, the lawfare, the unjust persecutions, the relentless media attacks, and on and on.
	But his list completely left out the biggest issue of all, the COVID response of his father.
	At some point, the exclusion of this topic moved from puzzling to creepy, as we were supposed to forget about all of it.
	So Trump himself mentioned the COVID response obliquely, once again saying that he doesn't get enough credit for what he did.
	Oh, I give him all the credit he deserves.
	I'm about the only person who does.
	He wants that credit. I give him that credit.
	Everybody else say, no, no, no, you didn't do the vaccine.
	Pretend that he didn't do the vaccine.
	He doesn't have anything to do. No, he did the vaccine.
	He was proud of it. And he killed 17 million people.
	But he now knows better than the past, not to mention the shot of which he was once very proud.
	But now the very mention of it elicits boos, which he also knows.
	And so he excluded that from his stump speech.
	The Trump stump speech.
	Otherwise, he's never spoken in any detail about the precise conditions that led him to approve the lockdowns.
	He flipped. He flipped on this issue.
	Oh, no, yeah. Listen very carefully for what Trump says about this or about that, about crypto, Bitcoin, or whatever.
	Oh, well, good. He said what we want to hear.
	Well, you know, he flipped from opposing these things on March 9th to approving them two days later.
	What happened on the 11th?
	As I said before, the WHO declared a pandemic.
	So Trump declared a pandemic.
	Trump declared an emergency.
	The pandemic had already been declared by his big pharmaceutical HHS executive, Alex Azar.
	But yeah, on March the 9th, he thought, nah, we don't need to do anything about this.
	But then, when the WHO does it, he approved all this stuff.
	You see, because Trump is a globalist shill.
	He's there as a cover story.
	He's there so the alt-right media can tell you not to worry.
	He's got it covered.
	You know, it's interesting. When Hollywood does this predictive programming, right?
	They show you something like Terminator.
	They go through a scenario, dystopian scenario.
	And typically what Hollywood will do, they don't do what George Orwell did with 1984.
	Typically what they do, they got a happy ending.
	You got some one hero, single hero, who fixes everything.
	We've been programmed to think that, you know, we've been programmed to see this dystopian future.
	So they can program us with fear.
	Then we've been programmed to believe there's going to be one guy, one guy, maybe Trump, who's going to save us from that.
	And what's going around now on the internet is this, this Trump matrix.
	Look at this. Oh, he's got extra ears too, by the way.
	Biden has, did you notice he's got two ears on one side of his head?
	The better to shoot you with.
	So they do all this thing where he stops the Trump character, stops the bullets like the Matrix character, right?
	And then shoots them back at him.
	Well, the right loves this.
	The left said, he blows up Biden and all the rest.
	He looks at the bullet and he sends it back to them.
	You know, that type of thing. We've been trained.
	To be fearful of a dystopian thing.
	And they've shown us all these different dystopian scenarios that DARPA and the CIA and all these people are working feverishly and have been for decades with unlimited amounts of money.
	They're working to create these very dystopian scenarios.
	But we've been programmed.
	The most important part of the programming is we sit back and think that one guy is going to fix it all.
	We just got to get that guy in the White House.
	He'll fix it all. You see, that's the most insidious thing about the predictive programming.
	And it's not just Hollywood that's done that.
	The conservative alt-right media has and is doing that right now to you.
	Oh, you know what you need?
	You need a hero. You need a hero.
	A hero's going to save all this stuff for you single-handedly.
	No, folks, listen to Buckminster Fuller.
	We're all crew on Starship Earth.
	If you don't do anything about this, if you don't fight it at the local level, they're going to do it to you.
	You're not going to be saved from somebody at the top.
	The only savior is Jesus.
	And he doesn't do politics.
	The common belief in the Republican Party, he's not on the ballot, and beyond, is that Trump was roiled by his bureaucracy.
	Convinced to go along with the policies and ideas that wrecked the country and arguably lost him the presidency.
	After all, it was his own CDC that issued the call for mail-in ballots on March the 12th, 2020.
	What? What? March the 12th?
	That's the day before Trump declared the emergency.
	Oh, what's going on?
	Well, Jeffrey Tucker points out.
	So what does that say about what was happening behind the scenes to undermine Trump?
	What does that say about who runs him?
	About who owns him?
	Look, he put a big pharmaceutical executive in charge of HHS, which is over NIH and over NIAID that Fauci ran, over the CDC and all the rest of this stuff.
	He put in a pharmaceutical executive.
	And so he's taking orders from the World Health Organization.
	He's taking orders from the CDC. He isn't giving the orders to them.
	He's taking orders from them. Is that a good thing?
	Oh, wow, that's good.
	See, it's not Trump. It's these other people.
	Trump prostituted himself to them.
	He took the money and did what they said.
	It's just that simple.
	The same thing he was saying that he did when he gave, that he was doing when he gave money to Lala Harris.
	I gave her money. You know, I give these people money and they kiss my behind.
	Well, these people give him money, and he kisses the behind of the CDC, and of Pfizer, and Moderna, and the World Health Organization, and Davos, and all the rest of them, because they give him money.
	He's just a facade. He's just a prostitute.
	He's not being undermined. He doesn't have an agenda.
	His agenda is to get paid.
	His agenda is to be in the position where he doesn't have to pay the politicians, but where he sits in the seat and they kiss his ring and they give him money.
	And they ask him for favor and he grants them favors when they give him money.
	Why would the CDC have intervened with an urge for mail-in voting liberalization, a dramatic upending of all U.S. election protocols without Trump's permission?
	And then you could ask, Jeffrey Tucker doesn't put it here, but you could ask, and why did the CDC, without Trump's permission, stop all foreclosures and evictions?
	Look, I didn't want to see people get evicted out of their homes or foreclosed out of their homes because Trump shut down their business or their job or whatever, and they can't pay the bill.
	But you see, instead of fixing the problem, These people will create a second problem.
	That's the way the politicians always do.
	They never admit the first problem.
	They never correct the first problem.
	They never repent from it.
	Instead, what they do is they create secondary and tertiary issues that go on and on and on after that bad problem.
	And so again, for them to declare that they can stop foreclosures and evictions, that's horrific.
	Stop the lockdown instead.
	Right? But they didn't do that.
	Trump extended it a couple of times.
	Biden extended it over and over again.
	And the CDC, even when they told the Supreme Court, that's okay, you don't have to rule on it.
	We're going to stop it. And so the Supreme Court said, all right, we won't say anything.
	We'll just let them pull it back.
	And then they didn't pull it back.
	And then the Supreme Court came in.
	You know, Kavanaugh has said that.
	Kavanaugh, along with Roberts, they said they're going to end it, so we'll let them end it.
	Then when they didn't end it, they came in and finally ended it.
	But you know, where did they get this and how did they do that without Trump's help?
	The Bill of Rights was effectively deleted, as Justice Gorsuch has written.
	He said, since March of 2020, we may have experienced the greatest intrusion on civil liberties in the peacetime history of this country.
	Governors and local leaders imposed lockdown orders, forcing people to remain in their homes.
	Bribed with Washington cash to do so. They shuttered businesses, schools, public and private. They closed churches, even as they allowed casinos and other favored businesses to carry on. They threatened violators, not just with civil penalties, but with criminal sanctions too. They surveilled church parking lots. They recorded license plates. They issued notices warning that attendance at even outdoor services satisfying all state social distancing and hygiene
	requirements could amount to criminal conduct. They divided cities and neighborhoods into color-coded zones.
	They forced individuals to fight for their freedoms in court on emergency timetables and then changed their color-coded schemes when defeat in court seemed to be imminent.
	That's a moot point. Don't rule.
	I don't want a precedent saying I can't do this in the future.
	So we'll just remove it and it's a moot point now, right?
	Federal executive officials entered the act too, not just with emergency immigration decrees.
	They deployed a public health agency to regulate landlord tenant relations nationwide.
	They used a workplace safety agency to issue vaccination mandates for most working Americans, OSHA.
	By the way, OSHA violated its own rules about masks.
	They had always prohibited continuous use of masks.
	So they're only warranted and they actually required them in some dusty environments.
	So they said, if you're going to put somebody in a dusty environment, you've got to let them off every 20 minutes to take that mask off so they can breathe.
	Well, that was just the beginning, said Jeffrey Tucker.
	The event kicked off the most incredible federal government spending binge since World War II. Nobody likes to talk about that either.
	The basis of a great deal of our economic problems continued on by the Biden administration from the Trump president.
	You know, when all this stuff happened, and it was beginning to happen, we had a conservative billionaire, who I knew well, liked him, and he came to Infowars to sell the lockdown on air.
	He had just come from Governor Abbott's office.
	And he was demanding that Abbott lock everything down.
	And again, like I said, I knew him.
	He was a very nice guy. Kind enough to, when he saw me in the parking lot, come over to me as he was going into the building.
	And he asked about my heart attack because he knew about that.
	And it's been the first time since I've seen him, since my heart attack.
	And I haven't seen him since.
	I don't know if he has publicly pushed back against this.
	Public admitted that it wasn't the right thing to do.
	But he was adamant about pushing it.
	In his case, I think it was an honest mistake.
	Like I said, because I know him.
	And because he didn't have any ties to anything that was going to financially profit in any of that.
	But folks, even if we were just genuinely mistaken, we need to make that correction.
	Again, in contemporary America, plenty of partisan truths become saleable.
	And enjoy vast public attention, but if both parties and two administrations have their handprints all over the worst series of policy decisions in modern history, the subject is made to disappear.
	It's more true because only a handful of nations in the entire world did not follow this path entirely.
	It's easier just to sweep this whole thing under the rug, which is precisely what is happening.
	Remember, too, that all major media participated in ginning up the global frenzy for lockdown and the up-and-coming alternative media for the most part, conservative media as well.
	Indeed, this period set up the model that most tech platforms are now following.
	But he said, look at what the results are.
	Lifespans are falling faster than ever before.
	The substance abuse problems are still pandemic level.
	The birth rate has fallen.
	Church attendance is at historic lows.
	Museums are only half full.
	Major art venues still experiencing financial hardship, and many are closing up.
	All of this is true regardless of strong evidence of wholly unnecessary vaccine injury and death.
	Now we know there are conditions under which that's not the case.
	Many people screwed up.
	Everybody's hands are on the actions.
	All official institutions cooperated and so forth.
	And so let's just make the whole subject go away.
	And here's the one thing that I disagree with him on.
	He says, this does not need to be the result of conspiracy.
	It's merely a tacit agreement.
	With an extension of individual and institutional self-interest.
	I disagree with that.
	It doesn't have to be a conspiracy.
	Everything doesn't have to be a conspiracy.
	But if it obviously is a conspiracy, say it!
	Don't run from it.
	Are you afraid of that label?
	Conspiracy theorist? If you're doing the best and you're telling the truth and you're presenting evidence, if you're not a racist, don't worry about the names that they call you.
	We've got to get to the truth here.
	And where there is a tacit agreement is the people who have tacitly agreed to participate in this folly, this campaign of fear, and still are scared to death in many of the places.
	That's why everything is still failing.
	Because in New York and places like that where they've got the museums and they've got the art venues and things like that, people are scared to death.
	So it's all dying.
	And so, it doesn't have to be the result of a conspiracy.
	But look, folks, they practiced this for 20 years.
	They practiced it for 20 years.
	They laid out all of the legal structure for it.
	First, they did it two months after 9-11.
	After they had practiced it the first time two months before 9-11.
	Then they practiced it for 20 years.
	Then in 2005, they laid the legal framework for pushing these vaccines with the PrEP Act.
	So understand that when they've laid the legal foundation for it, when they've practiced what to do for 20 years, we cannot have a tacit agreement with this.
	You've got to make sure that they understand that you do not consent.
	I do not consent.
	None of us consent to this stuff.
	Don't consent to any of it.
	Finally, he said, this takes us to the subject of social change.
	Why, how, and when does it happen?
	He says, Thomas Kuhn's magisterial treatise, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions in 1962, reconstructs the history of science in contrast to the Whig theory of history, which posits a smooth trajectory of intellectual advancement.
	Kuhn describes scientific knowledge as moving episodically from orthodoxy to crisis to paradigm shift to pre-paradigm to coalescing around a new orthodoxy.
	What is he essentially describing?
	It's described more accurately in the fourth turning.
	Well, I've gone on for quite some time.
	I need to take a break and we're going to...
	We'll take a break and we'll come back and I've got a couple of comments.
	Well, let me read the comments before I take a break here.
	On Rumble, DG8 says, David, never forget if HCQ or ivermectin worked to help COVID patients in 2020, there was no way that Trump's Operation Warp Speed clock shot gets emergency use authorization.
	He was in on it and his cult continues to blame Fauci.
	That's right. And his stupid remarks that he made.
	Helped to portray anybody who would suggest anything other than a vaccine as off the wall.
	Well, I don't know. Can we inject some sunlight or bleach into our veins?
	What about hydroxychloroquine or something?
	Everybody's like, oh, come on.
	You know, this is not science.
	His comments allowed people to equivocate HCQ and ivermectin.
	And as I've said before, If Trump told us about it, why doesn't he say that people can have the freedom to try those things if they want to?
	Better yet, instead of spending so much money and having Peter Navarro try to change manufacturing facilities to make ventilators, why don't you just have the federal government Manufacture mass quantities something that doesn't have a patent on it like ivermectin.
	Oh, that's why. Because it doesn't have a patent on it.
	And because it isn't the one solution.
	This is the same thing that they're doing with the climate MacGuffin.
	They've got to have the electric cars.
	They've got to have all electric appliances.
	The end game with the climate stuff is to put us all on the grid that they're shutting down.
	They're shutting it down.
	Artificial intelligence people, they're going to set up their own individual private nuclear facilities.
	They might sell it to us at a very high rate, but maybe they won't.
	Maybe they won't give us a single watt of the power that they do with their hastily built, cheaply run, dangerous...
	Because we've seen all this stuff.
	I've seen the way that Elon Musk operates back in Bastrop where we were.
	He's absolutely disinterested.
	And any traffic regulations, environmental regulations, just dumps his waste into the river there.
	They say, well, you can't do that. We're going to fine you.
	And he goes, I don't care. Fine me.
	I'll pay the fine. I don't care.
	It doesn't faze him at all.
	So that type of attitude, these types of people, are now going to be making their own personal nuclear power plants.
	What if you or I were to try to do that?
	Even if we raise money, you think we'd get the approval?
	Absolutely no way. But they're trying to figure out how they can race this stuff through.
	The purpose of the climate stuff is to get us all hooked and dependent on the grid and then collapse that down.
	The purpose of all this fear campaign was to push out that vaccine and kill people with it.
	Rumble, 12 June 1776.
	Thank you for the tip. I appreciate that.
	It says, never give evil an inch.
	Yeah, absolutely. DGA, David, never forget Trump signed the modernizing influenza vaccines in 2019.
	He knew that as well. That's right.
	They changed the definitions of vaccines and they laid the groundwork for the mRNA stuff and said, you know, this is, well, a vaccine doesn't have to necessarily keep you from getting something, you know, change all this.
	Eric, thank you very much for the tip.
	And Fran Edwards, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	Thanks for joining us.
	You're welcome.
	♪♪♪ There was more to it than putting it on repeat I found the band and I knew there'd be men who knew whether the music was true or half right Phil Fies, Sidney de Jong, Steve Rubin, or Simon Stiles all go by the same name They were probably & Piddy Sir and
	Dr.Scheier The End
	You're listening to The David Knight Show Night Show.
	You you Well, they are monetizing fear.
	That's a good way to put it. That's the way Children's Health puts it.
	With these bird flu summits, they're talking about the Washington summit in particular.
	But this is, at the same time, there's going to be one in Arkansas.
	Tyson Chicken, very closely connected to the Clintons.
	And it was there that they had one last year.
	So this is their second one in Arkansas.
	But this is going to be an international bird flu summit in Washington, D.C. One critic said these organizers are, quote, purveyors of profit, not preparedness.
	Organizers of the International Bird Flu Summit to be held this fall in Washington, D.C. are planning sessions to discuss preparedness and response countermeasures.
	The summit has been organized by a privately held company, Syllabus X. Ha!
	It targets a wide audience, public health officials, international agencies and organizations, public policy makers, the pharmaceutical industry, scientists, researchers, stakeholders in industries such as poultry production, livestock diagnostics, food safety and health care.
	With the emergence of a highly virulent strain of bird flu affecting both cattle and humans, says the event's website, it is imperative that we come together to discuss preparedness.
	Folks, that is fundamentally a lie.
	It's based on a lie.
	We don't have a highly virulent strain of bird flu.
	We don't have bird flu that is affecting cattle and humans.
	Lie on top of lie.
	We've had four people, four people out of the 330 million people in America that got pink eye and no respiratory issues.
	And they say it's spread to humans.
	And they're going around with a PCR test.
	Measuring how many angels fit on the head of a pen in milk.
	They're not doing that to eggs, are they?
	This is... And we know what this is.
	We've talked about it over and over again.
	These cities...
	London, New York, the C40 initiative, put together by Sadiq Khan in London and Bloomberg in New York.
	Then they quickly got to 40 cities.
	Now they're over 100 cities.
	And they've said, and Eric Adams has said, we're going to start measuring, calculating the meat that people are eating, all the rest of the stuff.
	We've got to stop meat and dairy.
	And they've got a whole list of things.
	Cars, travel, even clothing that they want to stop you from getting.
	We cannot tolerate this stuff.
	Syllabus X did not respond when the defender asked who hired the company to organize the summit.
	It is a conference planning company, Syllabus X is, and it's charging a lot of money for admission.
	What they're giving the attendees is an opportunity to find out what contracts may be available to them so that they can get government or other contracts, you see.
	That's why people are giving money to the politicians right now.
	It's an advanced auction of stolen goods.
	Stolen from you. Syllabus X Chief Research Officer.
	Ahmed Al-Faraj is a business executive, they say, with a proven track record in international defense sales.
	Yeah, see, this is the biodefense industry.
	This is coming to us from DARPA, from BARDA, from the CIA, from these types of people.
	And mask mandates are returning to the Tour de France.
	After several riders have tested positive, and they say, fall ill.
	Well, I guess now after the masks, they're still going to be testing positive, and they're probably going to fall more often, aren't they?
	Shortness of breath comes along with the mask mandates.
	I suggest that they rename this bicycle tour now.
	They're going to put masks on people.
	Call it the Tour de Farce.
	That's what it is. They confirmed wearing masks will be a mandatory requirement for the mixed zones before and after the stage is finished.
	It doesn't matter whether your PCR test was right or not.
	It doesn't matter if the people are sick or not.
	We now know the masks don't do anything.
	It is a farce.
	A Tour de Farce.
	The 2018 Tour de France winner also tested positive ahead of yesterday's stage.
	But he's chosen to continue racing.
	He said, well, I don't feel great, but I'm going to keep racing.
	So, you know, be very afraid.
	Lock down the world because you've got a guy who's an athlete and he can still do this.
	Look, they need to forget the PCR. They need to practice CPR. And then you start doing EKGs.
	Because if anything, you may have one of these guys, if they've been vaccinated, they may suddenly die.
	That's what we see over and over again.
	People who don't know they've got a heart injury from the vaccines, they go out and they push it over the top as athletes have done in the past.
	They don't realize their heart's been compromised and they die suddenly.
	He doesn't need a PCR. He needs people who know how to do CPR. But even that's not going to save him.
	If that's what it is, it's going to drop him right away.
	No, they need to do EKGs instead of these garbage tests that they call PCRs everywhere.
	And then we finish out here with an op-ed piece here from, actually an article, from Guard Goldsmith, Liberty Conspiracy.
	This is his work that he does with MRCTV. Good article, Guard.
	New Jersey government readies mandatory genomic sequencing of all newborn baby blood.
	He says, remember, and he's got a video there as well, They Want Your Jeans.
	He said, remember when New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy appeared on Fox News in April of 2020 and almost seemed to laugh at Tucker Carlson's curiosity as to how Murphy could reconcile the Constitution with his shutdowns of private gatherings and businesses and schools and even outdoor recreation?
	Murphy's flip and vacuous reply, including such classic hits as, well, I wasn't even thinking about the Bill of Rights.
	Or that understanding the Constitution was, quote, above my pay grade.
	Above his pay grade.
	Has anybody checked his closet lately for gold bars?
	What kind of a pay grade does somebody have that is in public office and holds that office because they swore to uphold the Constitution of Bill Rice and said, well, that's not my job.
	It's above my pay grade.
	So he says...
	A lot of people saw at the time a childish, arrogant, insulting, dangerous manifestation of government arrogance.
	But now thanks to the Institute for Justice and the American Civil Liberties Union.
	This is interesting because the Institute for Justice is conservative about civil liberties.
	Of course, the ACLU is very liberal.
	ACLU sometimes gets on an issue that actually has to do with civil liberties.
	Usually they're wrong on most of these things.
	But it's good to see the two of them together working on this.
	Gard writes, the entire world not only can see that the governor and his ideological and political allies are indeed ready to take the rights invasions a step farther into the realm of genetic dystopia.
	We can also see the New Jersey government already has been engaging in many facets of criminal activity.
	As Reason pointed out, mandatory genomic sequencing of all newborns, it sounds like something from a dystopian sci-fi story.
	But it could become a reality in New Jersey where health officials are considering adding this to the state's mandatory newborn testing regime.
	And, of course, Rights Guard, as government plotters so often do, the pushers of this new invasion of privacy and data collection have created the seemingly ubiquitous government, quote, advisory subcommittee, unquote, in order to hear the public.
	And then, of course, advise precisely what the boosters of the new statute want, a go-ahead on the legislation.
	I've got to say, I have nothing but contempt for the way that this whole process works now with bureaucracies.
	As I've said before, the legislatures, certainly in Washington, but also the state legislatures in many states, have abdicated their responsibility to a bureaucracy.
	They create the bureaucracy.
	They pass the law like Nancy Pelosi said.
	We've got to pass it so we can find out what's in it.
	How are you going to find out what's in it?
	Well, we'll see what the bureaucracy puts in it, right?
	She's telling everybody the truth for once.
	And people thought she was lunatic because they're so clueless about how this whole thing operates.
	If they had the slightest clue as to how our government operates now, they would have seen that as...
	Cynical candor.
	She wasn't crazy.
	It was cynical candor.
	She's telling you exactly the way that it works.
	And so they pass all this stuff over.
	We have taxation without representation.
	We have regulation without representation.
	And you are allowed to write them a letter telling them that you don't like this stuff.
	And if they even look at it, they do whatever they want.
	They're under no obligation to consider or even read what you send to them.
	Members of both the ACLU on the left and the Institute of Justice on the right, see this is a threat as well, such schemes have attracted criticism from civil liberties groups, both of these across the spectrum.
	What we're talking about is information from kids that could allow the state and other actors to use that data to monitor, to surveil them and their families for the rest of their lives, said an attorney with the ACLU of New Jersey.
	Guard writes, even if the government did nothing with that data, seizure of the blood is a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment, which requires all government agencies at every level of the U.S. political system to acquire a warrant from a judge and upon that judge's public statement of probable cause before they can search and seize anyone or anything.
	And the warrant must cite only one person and specifically cite the item sought.
	They were very clear they did not want general warrants.
	You know, go to the FISA court and get a warrant to search Mr.
	and Mrs. Verizon, for example.
	And this is where the blood-based New Jersey version of the sci-fi film Gattaca doesn't set off alarms of what might be in the work.
	It doesn't just set them off.
	It goes a little bit further. The Institute of Justice is currently representing a group of New Jersey parents in a class-action lawsuit concerning the state's newborn testing practices.
	Like every other state, New Jersey requires hospitals to collect blood from newborn babies and turn it over to the state health authorities who use it to screen for various diseases.
	And like many states, New Jersey is less than transparent about this process.
	Parents, here's the key thing, folks.
	Parents are simply told the testing is mandatory.
	They are not told that they can object on religious grounds.
	Hear that, Travis? This is something to remember here.
	I'll be putting you to the test in a couple of months.
	Remember, you have religious objections to a tyrannical state.
	Anyway, they're not told what the state does with newborn blood samples after health screenings are completed.
	In fact, the state holds on to these blood samples for 23 years.
	And there are no legal restrictions on how they can be used.
	Some states have been found to be selling the blood samples to researchers or turning the blood over to the Pentagon's DNA registry.
	Or maybe the FBI's DNA registry.
	How did they locate this guy?
	He had his head blown off.
	This Crooks shooter.
	Well, they said that they got it from DNA. Maybe, you know, he's 20 years old.
	They've got the stuff on file here.
	Shortly after giving birth, medical staff, these two moms that they're representing with the Institute of Justice, shortly after giving birth, medical staff performed a routine heel prick.
	Isn't that funny? That's exactly what I've been calling a Fauci for the longest time.
	A heel prick. The children's blood was collected on a card, whisked away to the New Jersey Department of Health's newborn screening lab to be tested for a range of disorders.
	New Jersey didn't seek their consent first.
	Instead, each of them, each of the parents, got a handout stating that the New Jersey law mandated it.
	Well, it passed a law, so what?
	If the law is in violation with the Constitution, so what?
	If the law is in violation with your religious liberty, protected by the Constitution, so what?
	And again, this is one of the key takeaways and people who should have understood this and opposed this from the very beginning of this 2020 exercise But the real shock came upon learning What New Jersey did not disclose unknown to the parents a portion of their baby's blood remained unused after the screening was complete And New Jersey had unilaterally decided that it could keep the blood for 23 years New Jersey believed that it could also use the blood
	however it saw fit Will that be selling it to third parties or giving it to law enforcement or even turning it over to the Pentagon?
	That's right. Well, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	They're doing what in the place they named after me?
	Good thing I have the David Knight Show to keep me informed on the plots of these traitors.
	Making sense common again.
	This is the David Knight Show.
	Well, let's take a look at the miracle of Trump.
	We've got a lot of people talking about the miracle of Trump.
	And, of course, you know, we had, when you look at this, as I said before, you've got a lot of different options and people are playing with all these different conspiracies.
	You know, was it one kid who can't shoot straight and a Secret Service that's so wracked with DEI and political correctness and people who didn't earn it that they couldn't or wouldn't stop him?
	Or did they deliberately look the other way?
	Was there a conspiracy?
	Not just a lone shooter, but was there a conspiracy?
	Did they let in multiple shooters?
	Did you have government agents who were the shooters or whatever?
	Was this known by the Biden administration?
	Or was this something that was completely faked?
	Maybe Trump's ear wasn't hit.
	Maybe he bumped his head with a...
	You know, pre-placed a squib there or whatever.
	What is going on with all this stuff?
	Or maybe, you know, maybe it was real.
	And maybe, you know, God stepped in with a miracle, even if that is the case.
	As I said from the very beginning, you know, each of us is only about one inch from death multiple times.
	Every time you pass a car, think about that, right?
	If something distracted that guy in the other car that's going the other way from you, And he looks down and swerves into your lane.
	You guys hit head-on with a combined, you know, both of you going 50, 60 miles an hour, 120 mile an hour collision.
	Yeah, I mean, we all have close calls.
	Close calls that we may not even know about.
	And I talked about that at the very beginning.
	I said, from ear to eternity.
	You know, we're all of us less than an inch away from eternity every day with all these different things.
	And so, is this a reason for us to fall down and worship Trump as God's chosen?
	As now Congressman Ronnie Jackson, who was a physician to Trump and other presidents, now a congressman, he said,"...the bullet passed, coming less than a quarter of an inch from entering his head, struck the top of his right ear." The bullet track produced a two-centimeter-wide wound that extended down to the cartilage area of the ear.
	When we talk about two centimeters, we're talking about one inch is two and a half centimeters.
	So we're talking about four-fifths, a little bit more than three-quarters of an inch.
	I haven't seen anything that looks like that in the pictures of Trump's ear.
	Anyway, he said there was initially significant bleeding followed by marked swelling of the entire upper ear.
	The swelling has since resolved and the wound is beginning to granulate and heal properly.
	Based on the highly vascular nature of the ear, there is still intermittent bleeding requiring a dressing to be in place.
	And so he said given the broad and blunt nature of the wound itself, no sutures were required.
	And as I showed earlier, you know, we have this matrix type of thing.
	You know, the hero Trump who's going to stop everything.
	Yeah, my hero. I love the fact that this AI gave the Biden character two ears on one side of his head.
	This has really gotten the left upset.
	You know, oh, look, this shows Trump doing violence to Biden.
	It's like, come on, let's just...
	Let's just stop with all this stuff.
	I've seen the right do this as well.
	Elon Musk called this the best AI video to date when he's on and put it out.
	So, yeah, I mean, whatever.
	I'm sick of all of this stuff, quite frankly.
	And just, you know, Michael Brown, who is, he wrote on WND, he said, debunking the viral Christian meme about God and Trump.
	He said, a few days ago a friend emailed me asking me how to respond to a statement that a family member shared with her.
	The statement said, if you believe God intervened to save former President Trump but didn't intervene to save the kids in Uvalde or Parkland or Santa Fe or Sandy Hook, then you're worshipping partisan politics, not Jesus.
	He said it took me about two seconds to respond.
	It was a basically meaningless meme.
	And again, you know, different things happen to people at different times.
	We can't interpret what God is doing.
	As I pointed out, you know, God works in mysterious ways.
	The lyrics to that by William Cooper said, you know, he is his own interpreter.
	He will make it plain.
	In time, we will understand.
	And maybe that time is not even in this life.
	We'll understand why one person dies and another one doesn't.
	The time of our deaths and things like that.
	So that doesn't have anything to do with the biblical understanding of God, what he has declared his purposes to be.
	And then he says, there's another one that was posted on the site of a pastor, Zach Lambert.
	That is, the time that he wrote this had 3.7 million views and 196,000 likes.
	So what did it say? It said in the last 25 years, 40 million Americans have walked away from church.
	Most of these folks are not rejecting Jesus.
	They're rejecting the use of Jesus' name for the purpose of domination and oppression.
	They aren't even rejecting the Bible.
	They're rejecting hateful, harmful, exclusionary ways of reading it.
	I'm convinced that rejection like this doesn't make them unchristian.
	It makes them Christ-like.
	Jesus himself famously chastised religious leaders who weaponized scripture and elevated it above love of neighbor.
	He repeatedly denounced those who used the Bible to divide rather than to unite, who would incite violence rather than make peace, and who would exclude rather than include.
	He said, I'm tired of pastors and Christian leaders wielding the Bible like a weapon.
	We need to do better.
	Well, all of that is true.
	But you see, when we talk to somebody and they take the stand and witness stand, you say, we tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
	See, that's not the whole truth.
	The whole truth is that Jesus said if we say the truth to people, and even if we speak the truth in love, even if we warn them about the sin that they're engaged in, activity that has been condemned by God, that will have consequences in this life and the next, If we warn them about that, they don't want to hear it.
	And he said, people will hate you if you follow me.
	And so all that is true as well.
	And he also said, beware when everyone speaks well of you.
	So if you were to follow the lead of this particular pastor, and everybody would speak well of you, maybe that's because you're not giving them the whole truth.
	Maybe it's because you're ultimately living a lie.
	He said, I certainly share Zach's passion to introduce people to the real Jesus as opposed to the Jesus of my political party or my ideology or my nationality or my ethnicity or my personal biases.
	But could it be that Zach, along with some of these other people, were guilty of reading the Bible through their particular theological and ideological lenses as well?
	Lenses that were weaponizing scripture for their own cause.
	Could it be that the sword cuts both ways?
	He said, I also wrote the political seduction of the church, how millions of American Christians have confused politics with the gospel.
	A constant warning not to wrap the gospel in the American flag.
	Well, he's right about that.
	And so what did we see at the convention?
	We had Tucker Carlson.
	We had Franklin Graham.
	They were crediting God with Trump's survival.
	We had Todd Starnes saying, if your church didn't talk about this assassination on Sunday after the Saturday shooting, then you need to find another church.
	He said, this is spiritual warfare.
	It's like, no, if you want to see spiritual warfare, watch the RNC convention, where they're elevating every kind of debauchery And an iniquity that God has condemned so that they can win a political contest.
	And doing it and saying that this is what Christianity is.
	And that's what we're seeing from Tucker.
	That's what we're seeing from Franklin Graham.
	You know, God is among us, they said.
	So again, you know, was the attack, was that a lone shooter?
	Was it a Biden conspiracy?
	Was it a Trump conspiracy?
	Is God sovereign over this?
	Well, of course he is. But, you know, the fact that Trump survived this, if it was a legitimate attempt on him, and, you know, Whistler looked at it in detail, and he said, yeah, I've looked at, you know, what I could find, even about, you know, the picture of the bullet behind it.
	You know, that if you're going to, you know, both he and Travis were talking about the fact that if you're out Shooting in light, shooting up towards something, you're going to have a very, very fast shutter speed.
	Whistler said he even looked at it to see, okay, the speed of the bullet, how long of a contrail would you expect to see?
	It seems in the ballpark, that type of thing.
	So it could be real. So what?
	Does the fact that Hitler survived Operation Valkyrie, the plot to assassinate him, made into a movie, had Tom Cruise playing the guy that was going to be delivering the bomb or whatever, the fact that Hitler survived Operation Valkyrie and other assassination attempts, does that mean that God approved of Hitler?
	It doesn't prove anything.
	I mean, you can be grateful that nothing happened to Trump.
	But it does not put God's stamp of approval on anything that he does.
	Carlson said, the more I watched it, the more it struck me that everything was different after that moment.
	Everything, he said. This convention is different.
	The nation is different. The world is different.
	Trump is different. When he stood after being shot in the face, bloodied, and put his hand up, I thought at that moment, it's a transformation.
	This was no longer a man.
	Trump is no longer a man?
	Well, then, Tucker, please tell us, what is he?
	Is he Vashunu or whatever, the Hindu god?
	Or the Sikh god? What is he if he's no longer a man?
	This is the guy, by the way, who went out of his way to praise Putin and to lovingly focus on the subway that had a mosaic of Lenin.
	Boy, they really zoomed in and dwelt on that.
	Does he not know who Lenin is?
	Does he not know who Trump is?
	And of course, we've got a Southern Baptist megachurch pastor who was praising the RNC. Jack Graham has got a big church, thousands of people, I guess.
	I don't know how many he's got there. I don't know who this guy is.
	I've never seen his name before, even though he's got a big church.
	This is from Dissenter.
	This is a good example of somebody making an idol of politics.
	SBC megachurch pastor praises pro-abortion, pro-LGBT, porn star, Sikh, RNC festival as, quote, a spiritual movement.
	Yes, it is a spiritual movement.
	It absolutely is.
	That's where your spiritual warfare is right there, folks.
	If you are an RNC delegate, that's your mission field.
	If you're a Christian, that's what you need to be focusing on.
	Waking these people up in the GOP. Of course, they never have anything to say about the reawakened tours where you have Flynn leading people in these occultic prayers to ascended masters.
	Jack Graham, the pastor, apparently has mistaken a political circus for a move of the Holy Spirit as he recently praised the Republican National Convention as a spiritual movement.
	It's not only absurd but blasphemous and reveals a calculated willingness to drag God into this circus in order to legitimize it.
	And what Jack Graham tweeted out, it's been a privilege to participate in an historic and epic political convention that on numerous occasions felt like a spiritual movement.
	If you love God and country, this was never to be a forgotten experience.
	And see, what he's doing here, in a sense, is the same thing that a lot of people criticized about the Sikh lawyer who brought in her one and true God, whoever that was.
	And a lot of people said, look, she's worked in politics, honor her.
	Honor her for the work that she's done.
	But for her to be given the opportunity to lead a prayer, Of that exclusivity for these people to bow their heads in obedience to it.
	See, he could have talked about it.
	I've just been to this historic convention.
	It was great. He doesn't have to make it into a spiritual movement.
	And once he does that, he's crossing the line just like the Darmite Gillen or Dylan or whatever her name was did.
	And he is making this abomination now a spiritual movement.
	It's politics. It's kind of dirty.
	You put some gloves on and you work with it.
	Arms length, that type of thing.
	You don't rub it all over your face.
	A pro-abortion, pro-LGBT porn star on stage giving a speech about how she's now found a home in the Republican Party.
	It's even worse than that.
	She said, yeah, I'm an atheist, but I'm not a Satanist, but I really do like the Satanists.
	I think they're great. They help people to get abortions, she said.
	A Sikh prayer to a false god and extensive compromises on LGBT, abortion issues, so forth.
	And Jack Graham calls it an epic political convention that is a spiritual movement.
	He says it's one thing to hold your nose and to vote to minimize societal damage, but it's another entirely to elevate such an event to the level of spiritual revival, which is what so many people do.
	And then we have Franklin Graham, who took the stage and spoke.
	He says, as the 47th president, Trump will keep his word, he said.
	Well, why does he think that?
	I mean, as 45th president, Trump did not keep his word.
	As 45th president, Trump divorced the Constitution like it was a trophy wife of his.
	That's exactly what he did.
	Yeah, he took oaths to love and cherish, sickness and health, his wives, and look at what he did.
	It's not just a divorce. Divorce is very common.
	We never know exactly what is going on in a family, who's to blame or whatever.
	But in the case of Trump, what made his divorces so public was the fact that he taunted and trashed his wife afterwards.
	That was what, in my opinion, made him a pariah.
	And anybody can have a divorce.
	It takes two people to make this thing work, and so it can break up, and it's unfortunately happening all the time.
	But to then publicly troll that person, just like he did everybody that he fired in his administration.
	Oh, bringing him in, he's just all, this is the best person ever.
	And then when he fires him, he just attacks him.
	He did that to his wife.
	And he did that to the Constitution.
	And he did it to the Bill of Rights.
	President Trump has been a man of his word, says Franklin Graham, ever since I've known him.
	I think he meant to say a man of the world.
	He's been a man of the world, not of his word.
	Things that he said he'll do, he did.
	No, he didn't.
	Not at all. We'll be right back
	Oh
	Analyzing the globalist's next move Oh you you And now, The David Knight Show.
	Well, folks, we have a new sponsor that I want to tell you about.
	And it's kind of interesting because it's all about bees.
	The company is Patriot Bee Best.
	Bee as in the buzzing insects.
	B-E-E. That's PatriotBeeBest.com.
	You all know the cost of food has skyrocketed.
	We keep hearing about coming shortages and supply chain issues.
	But have you stopped to think about the natural food chain and the importance of our bee populations and maintaining it?
	Well, the good people at Patriot Bee Best have done extensive research and study about this important issue, and they've created an educational online digest to help spread the word about the challenges facing the American bee, and educating American patriots to engage as advocates to inform others, and to band together to help solve this problem.
	Patriot Bee Best is a digital bee sanctuary for education, engagement, and real change.
	These people know bees, and Patriot Bee Best is laser-focused on restoration and preservation of the American bee population.
	You can learn about how the honeybee benefits all of us, discover bee-friendly initiatives and other helpful resources.
	At the worker bee subscription level, each issue of Patriot Bee Best Buzz offers educational information, advocacy opportunities, bee-friendly products, bee rescue activities, and more.
	In addition, Queen Bee subscribers will get access to bonus content on patriotic topics related to restoring and reinforcing American values.
	Join to learn about restoring the health of the American bee population.
	Check it out at www.patriotbeebest.com to subscribe and to see all the cool bee-related products that they have to offer.
	Patriot Bee Best is the destination for all things American Bee.
	Check out the links in the description to find out more about the exciting opportunities to be part of this Patriot Bee Best hive.
	Catch the buzz today.
	And they've also got a video link there.
	Why is our American Bee population under attack?
	We understand that our food supply is under attack.
	And it's under attack from a lot.
	We've seen the beehive collapse that is a few years ago.
	There was a lot of talk about that.
	People kind of moved on to other issues as we saw a societal collapse of humans as well.
	But they're coming after our food.
	And when you look at the things that are natural, when you look at local honey and how effective that is in terms of helping you with allergies, you know, we had a scout got attacked by some animal, and then he got attacked by the veterinarian who nearly killed him, cut all the skin off of his leg.
	I mean, he had inside and outside.
	He had exposed muscle and everything.
	One of the key things that we did was Was to put honey on it, to keep down infection and things like that.
	That was the real concern, was that he was going to get an infection and lose his leg.
	And, you know, it grew back.
	He's still got a bad scar, but it helps a great deal.
	And when Karen had her issues with her hand, and thank you all for praying because she is much better now.
	But she had open cuts where it broke.
	They push it down so hard after they...
	You know, inject it for this condition.
	It's a hereditary thing.
	It starts creating nodules that draw in your tendons and things like that.
	And so they soften it up with the injection.
	That's the thing that caused her problem.
	And then after that, they smash her hand.
	And when they did that, that caused some open wounds as well.
	A very painful thing. But we were very worried about the side effects of it.
	So thank you all for praying. She seems to be over the hump of that.
	Got very worried about it when she had severe headaches.
	And then realized that she had bruises all up and down her side.
	Because she had been... Anyway, from the injection.
	But... We're putting honey on her open wound as well.
	And of course, it's great in terms of nutrition.
	It's great in terms of topical stuff.
	And you know, when you look at bees, they're just absolutely fascinating.
	The way that they work.
	And it's another example, I think, of God's intelligent design.
	The way they do the honeycomb, the way they communicate with each other, the way they organize, and all the rest of it.
	It truly is amazing. On Rumble, DG8, thank you very much for the tip.
	It said, David, thank you for standing on the truth.
	Thank you for promoting Jesus Christ.
	Love your bumper music and videos.
	Well, thank you. That's really kind.
	Thank you for the support.
	I appreciate that. On Rumble, I'm Marty.
	Hey, Marty. Thank you for the tip as well.
	He says, I and all of us in Vietnam were ordered to take HCQ as an anti-malarial.
	It worked. Never got malaria.
	Oh, isn't that interesting? Yeah, we've got to pretend that it doesn't exist, and we've got to pretend that we don't know what the safety profile of it is, and we've got to pretend that it's only for, you know, HCQ and ivermectin.
	That's for horses, right? Yeah.
	On Rumble, Sam Miller.
	Thank you very much, Sam.
	I appreciate that. That's very generous.
	I appreciate that. David, thank you for your courage in bringing the truth to us.
	It's much appreciated.
	God bless you and your family. Well, thank you.
	That is a blessing. Thank you.
	You know, last week, we got sidetracked with all political conventions and assassination stuff and everything.
	We do have some more assassination news.
	We have some local political news.
	Examples of some stuff that's coming out about La La.
	As well as, is Biden alive?
	We've got a lot of people.
	Even Brett Barrett, Fox News, is asking things like that.
	So we'll take a look at that and some of the reports about him being rushed off in a medical situation coming up here.
	But I say we got kind of distracted on all this political show and everything because a week ago, Jason Barker notified us during the show about what was happening with YouTube.
	This is big news, and it is big news, and I want to take a closer look at it now.
	We mentioned it, but only briefly.
	And Jason's probably covered this at the Nights of the Storm now.
	But he gave me a link to Hickok45.
	And it's a channel that we're familiar with.
	And he's got millions of subscribers.
	As Jason Barker says, YouTube is going after content creators who have firearms and accessory sponsors right now.
	They're issuing strikes and termination for content created after June 18, and also retroactively removing older content from before June 18.
	So anything you did before June 18, if you firearm laid it or had sponsors or whatever, that's gone, flushed down the memory hole.
	And if you do it after June 18, they may flush down your entire channel.
	So a lot of these people are taking this stuff down so they can keep their channel.
	Because, I mean, when you look at it, when this broke, this is a month after the new regulation that they discovered this.
	And they probably have a lot more than three videos that are going to get three strikes on there.
	Once Google sees you there, they're going to start looking at you under a microscope.
	And so, Hickok45 had 7.7 million subscribers on YouTube.
	And you see, when they do this, they're focusing, again, on the monetization.
	YouTube and Google, quite frankly, Google has strangled a lot of sites that they disagree with politically by strangling them from advertising.
	And so they demonetized them in different ways.
	First, they would demonetize a lot of people on YouTube.
	They would demonetize websites by making sure that they couldn't be found using the Google search engine, a search engine that is now designed not to find things, but to hide things.
	And so, nearly 8 million subscribers.
	All the videos published after the 18th will have to be removed by them.
	They will get strikes, only get three strikes and you're out.
	Videos published prior to June 18th will simply be removed.
	They said this affects roughly 95% of the content on their channel, which could result in practically all their work being produced over the span of 15 to 20 years on the platform being removed.
	Well, welcome to the club. I know what that's like.
	I know what it's like to just have everything flushed.
	And without, in my case, in our case at InfoWars, it was done without any prior warning whatsoever.
	I never had a single strike.
	As a matter of fact, after they took down my channel, I got an email from them that said, a complaint has been filed.
	A complaint? You don't have three strikes and you're out?
	No, it's a complaint has been filed.
	They wouldn't even say what the complaint was, the single complaint was.
	But they continued to send that cryptic short message to me, and they would not respond to To me contacting them any way, shape, or form.
	They wouldn't respond to it.
	But they continued to spam me with that on an irregular interval.
	It could be anywhere from 5 minutes to 15 minutes, they'd send me that email message again.
	And so they're filling up my inbox, and so I set up a filter to put it all into a particular folder.
	And I kept checking on it.
	Yeah, they're still sending this. They did that for months.
	They did it over 8,000 times before they finally stopped.
	And it truly is amazing what they're doing.
	So I guess my only question is, will Hickok be able to do Christmas music?
	He can't do gun stuff anymore.
	Will they still stop him if he does some Christmas carols with his bow there?
	Because that's what they did to me.
	They took my, after all that stuff, I only just put up a thing of Christmas music and they took down my Christmas music thing.
	Same thing, you know, just gone.
	No three strikes.
	Didn't claim there's any copyright violations.
	It was my music. And I just took the thing down.
	And by the way, Google is planning new content scanning censorship tech.
	There's so many different angles that they have with all this stuff.
	You know, Microsoft has what I've talked about, the CCP. I call it CCPA. So it looks like the Chinese Communist Party of America, doesn't it?
	But it actually stands for the Coalition for Content Provenance, in other words, who created this, and authentication.
	And it is a coalition of CPUs, CPU companies, the ARM processors, and Intel, along with software companies like Adobe, Along with the mainstream media that is going to flag people that they don't like as liars and give that to the hardware and software people, who will then put a mark on everything.
	And if they identify it as coming from David Knight, they won't even allow it to be uploaded anywhere.
	That's what Microsoft is doing.
	With funding, by the way, from DARPA. Now, Google is creating new content scanning censorship tech.
	And they filed a patent application.
	This was pointed out by Reclaim the Net.
	A patent application published just this month.
	And it's different from other automated methods and systems because this one is going to be powered with artificial intelligence, which I said from the very beginning, that is the purpose of artificial intelligence.
	That's its key purpose, is to create a police surveillance state.
	And that's what it does really, really well.
	You know, when it comes up with these answers to queries that you give it, it's doing pattern matching.
	You know, we talked about that before, you know, the classic case of you've got a wolf, a goat, and a cabbage, and you can only take one of them across in your boat at a time, and, you know, the goat will eat the cabbage if you leave them together, and if you leave the wolf and the goat together, you do this.
	And so the very first step in it, When Whistler was playing with it, he said, look at this.
	He said, it's just regurgitating back the solution when you simplify the problem and just say, I've got a goat.
	Well, it's...
	It says, you know, the first step is you take the goat to the other side.
	I don't remember what it was.
	And then it says, now go back and get the cabbage.
	And he says, wait a minute, there isn't any cabbage.
	Oh, oh, I see what you mean. And so he keeps going with this thing until he gets it to go into a Star Trek kind of meltdown.
	Because, go back and get the goat or the wolf.
	There isn't a goat or a wolf. It's just looking at these patterns and putting them in there, right?
	Right. And so, you know, the first thing you do is take the goat over, then you go back and get the cabbage and so forth.
	But there is no cabbage in this particular case.
	So it's just looking for patterns and matching those.
	It's looking for a pattern in your query, and it's matching that to other things that it thinks are the answer.
	But it doesn't know. It doesn't understand your question.
	It doesn't understand the answer. But it doesn't have to if it's going to be used for surveillance and matching in a police state.
	And that's its purpose.
	And again, it's DARPA that's behind that as well, has been from the very beginning.
	What should be the key question is what is going to be considered to be objectionable content.
	And of course, that's very subjective.
	You know, the banned content is whatever they say is banned content.
	And once you are labeled as a producer of banned content, then you are the banned content.
	You are the objectionable content, and it's just going to be a matter of time before they bring this all to podcasts and to everything else.
	And so, I want to go back and bring this up in the wake of what has happened since the Trump shooting.
	And you've got people all over the conservative spectrum, from Rand Paul, to Libs of TikTok, to Breitbart, to WND, to all of them, Daily Caller, they're all saying, well, now we've got to punish and cancel people who ever made a metaphorical reference to a bullet, or to crosshairs, or to a bullseye, or anything like that as a figure of speech.
	What a stupid and dangerous game to play.
	That's going to come back on them.
	It's already been applied to them, but now they see, oh, now we've got a chance to own the libs.
	Well, if your way of owning the libs is to destroy the First Amendment and free speech, shame on you.
	And we ought to condemn this kind of stuff.
	You know, Rand Paul really has lost the plot here.
	He's lost the plot in terms of pushing this pandemic narrative and saying, well, it was gain of function and it really is real and it was done in China and all the rest of this stuff, you know, absolving Trump and himself and other Republicans for having done nothing to stop the globalists, for having facilitated it, in fact.
	Blame it on the Chinese.
	Say that it was real.
	Say it was gain of function. Blame it on Fauci and the Chinese.
	Well, he was doing that at the same time that his wife was buying stock in remdesivir, which Fauci pushed for Gilead Pharmaceutical.
	So Rand Paul urges Biden to tone down the political rhetoric.
	Yeah, so what political rhetoric?
	Well, you know, he said something about putting him in a crosshair.
	I played the clip for you where Lester Holt said to him, you know, you talked about putting a Trump in the bullseye or the target or whatever.
	He said, I meant making him the focus.
	And you know what? In that particular case, Biden was finally right.
	He's not as accurate as a broken clock, which is right twice a day.
	He might be right once in a lifetime.
	But he was right about that issue.
	And as I've said before, extremism in defense of free speech is no vice.
	And moderation of content is no virtue.
	And I don't care what your motives are.
	You either have free speech, and you have free speech for the kind of free speech that you don't like.
	Free speech that is evil, that is wrong, that is even a lie.
	Or else you don't have free speech.
	If you don't allow people to lie, yeah, oppose them.
	Absolutely oppose them. But don't oppose them by getting them canceled.
	Oppose them by opposing the lie.
	So Lester Holt told Biden, you call President Trump an existential threat, and you said it's time to put him in the bullseye.
	And Biden said, I didn't say crosshairs.
	He says, no, I said bull's high.
	He tried to pass it off as meaning and focus.
	And that's exactly what it does mean.
	And you notice that Zero Hedge is trying to target Biden.
	Oh, yeah.
	They're trying to put Biden in the crosshairs there.
	But you know what? When you look at Lester Holt coming after Biden for that, Just remember that these Jacobin socialists and communists always come for their leaders, don't they?
	Yeah, you might say this is poetic justice and he deserves it and so forth, but they always do come for their leaders.
	Have you taken a step back and done a little soul-searching on things that you may have said that could incite people who are not balanced, asked Holt.
	Biden said, well, I haven't engaged in that kind of rhetoric.
	And the article says Biden falsely claimed, falsely claimed.
	Well, does this sound familiar?
	Does this sound like the left saying that speech is violence?
	And then, as Reason Magazine took libs of TikTok to task, For getting a Home Depot employee fired, for calling for his assassination.
	In other words, what they said was, and there's a lot of liberals out there who are saying, yeah, we need to do this to all conservatives.
	And certainly, that kind of threat, and that is a threat, that should be actionable.
	But if somebody looks at a politician that is shot and says, well, you know, it's too bad they missed or whatever, that's evil, that's reprehensible.
	But I still think that's protected speech.
	How many conservatives would say that about Biden?
	You know as well as I do that they'd be saying that left and right.
	Somebody took a shot at Biden and nearly missed him.
	Or Pelosi.
	Or you take a look at Pelosi's husband, right?
	The things that were said when he was attacked with a hammer.
	Um... For people who are not big influencers, certainly, and like in this particular case, she focused on this employee, got the employee fired at Home Depot.
	Reason says, whatever your feelings about the former president, cheering on his assassination attempt is, in fact, wrong.
	But it is not a threat, you see.
	I agree with them. It is wrong, but it's also not a threat.
	They said it is also wrong to weaponize your millions of followers, to turn a random woman into a national pariah, to sic a mob on her, to render her unable to support herself and possibly her family because she made tasteless comments on social media.
	See, I'm sick of this being done by big tech.
	And I'm sick of it being done by big conservatives, too.
	Come on, folks. You either support the First Amendment or you don't.
	I could disagree with you, but...
	Oh, whoa, whoa. Look at this.
	Secret Service head Kimberly Cheadle resigned.
	Well, thank you, Travis.
	We'll talk about that. And then I've got a bunch of stuff about the hearing yesterday.
	We'll talk about that. There's a bipartisan call for her to resign.
	I'm surprised that she did.
	When I saw her demeanor there, it was unbelievably arrogant.
	But anyway, so here's the principle.
	Let's finish up with this before we go to the assassination thing and the Secret Service.
	Cancel culture comes in different forms.
	But this is arguably its purest.
	We're not talking about somebody who wielded considerable influence over society, whether it was in Hollywood or in Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., or the news media.
	We aren't even talking about a public school teacher who said this to a classroom full of students.
	We're talking about a woman who worked at a big box retail store as a cashier.
	And she makes one comment on social media.
	Too bad it didn't hit him squarely, said Tony Bendeli, a former small-town firefighter.
	He put that up on Facebook.
	As of this writing, libs of TikTok's initial post excoriating him has been seen 11.7 million times.
	And he resigned. You know, she was fired from Home Depot.
	He resigned. He says, please accept this as my resignation from the firehouse.
	I can't do this, he said, later on Facebook.
	I have been threatened.
	My family has been threatened.
	My friends have been threatened.
	I have never felt so unsafe in my life.
	It's one thing to ruin my life.
	I accept that. But to put everyone else in danger around me, to shut down everyone's daily life, this is not okay.
	So how in the world does a hateful comment, well, it's too bad that they missed, Too bad Trump is still alive.
	How does that make it okay to threaten somebody?
	How does that make that okay?
	Well, quite frankly, it doesn't.
	But see, conservatives are embracing all of the ideas that we've got to have a savior in the White House, that we are going to cancel the people that we disagree with.
	Here's another one. Lincoln Project, co-founder, had said back in 2015, That Trump needed to be stopped, and the way that needed to happen, he said, flashback to the Lincoln Project, Rick Wilson said they're going to have to go out and put a bullet in Donald Trump.
	And so they came back at him, and he said, that was a metaphor for what the donors needed to do.
	He made the comment in October 2015 in the context of arguing that Republican donors needed to destroy Trump's campaign and to boost a stronger candidate to defeat Hillary Clinton.
	You know, again, you look at Alex Jones in terms of the lead-up to January 6th over the weekend.
	He goes out and he says publicly, Biden will be removed from office one way or the other.
	Now, I didn't know that he was doing a rally that weekend, and I came in on Monday.
	On my program, I said that January the 6th thing was a grift, and I said it on Monday, December the 14th, because...
	Um, they had already sent in the Electoral College tallies, and I've talked about this many times, so I won't go into it.
	But basically, if they had gotten four key states, razor-thin margin, they'd gotten the state legislatures to agree that Trump was the legitimate winner, then they would have had something.
	Would have had two slates of electors coming from that, from a particular state, and then Pence and other people could have decided which one they're going to do.
	It would have gone to the courts. They would have had a good case.
	But they didn't do any of that.
	So I said, it's over. And I said, this is nothing but a grift.
	And I didn't realize that he was out there doing that.
	And I didn't realize that that statement, that Biden would be removed from office one way or the other, people were calling for his arrest on Monday.
	And again, it's over-the-top rhetoric.
	It's the kind of professional wrestling rhetoric that you saw with Hulk Hogan and everything.
	But a lot of people wanted to not only censor that, but to arrest him.
	We can't, though, have free speech if we're not going to allow heated rhetoric.
	And I think that many conservatives actually have missed this completely.
	And here's an example.
	In Germany, the German government has launched a massive crackdown on press freedom from people that they label as right-wing.
	In what may be the most aggressive move against press freedom since the Second World War, Germany has banned Compact magazine and had over 200 police officers raid the office in the home of the publisher.
	Along with the homes of other employees and financial backers.
	This is coming from Remix News.
	At 6am, masked German police officers raided the home of the publisher, confiscated hard drives and assets.
	The magazine has a large readership in Germany and a YouTube channel with millions of views and over 300,000 subscribers.
	The website and its social media channels have now been erased from the web.
	You see, conservatives, if you want to play this dangerous game, they can come back on you.
	Just take a look at the schools, for example.
	How did we wind up with government schools?
	Well, it was part of the Communist Manifesto and the Socialists.
	They wanted taxpayer-funded schools so they could indoctrinate the kids.
	But it was the conservatives who actually made it happen for them.
	The conservatives said, yeah, we want to instill American values in the kids.
	The way we do that is with government schools.
	And so they were the big supporters of this, except it was taken over by the leftists.
	That's the way it works. You want to get flushed down the memory hole?
	You want to have newspapers shut down?
	Well, then make a big deal out of people saying this or that that you disagree with and play that cancel game yourself, conservatives, and you'll see how this works out.
	Far-left German Interior Minister Nancy Fazer took to Ex to celebrate the banning of the publication, which she said she personally ordered.
	Hmm. Yeah, the speech furor.
	Today I banned the right-wing extremist compact magazine.
	It agitates in an unspeakable way against Jews, against Muslims, and against our democracy.
	Lady, you don't have a democracy.
	Not one worth keeping if you're going to do this.
	If you're not going to support free speech, you don't have a democracy worth keeping.
	You have a democracy that people should agitate against.
	Our ban is a hard blow against right-wing extremist scene, she said.
	The press was informed of this ahead of time.
	They did a perp walk with the guy.
	They were all there to photograph him being brought out at 6 a.m.
	in the morning in his night robe while he was surrounded by masked and armored police officers.
	In addition, the video production company that he had was also banned.
	These people are literal Nazis.
	Nazis didn't like free speech either, you know.
	It also marked the first time a media outlet of this size has been targeted in such an extraordinary manner.
	The private homes of various employees were also raided.
	In addition, financial backers of the outlet also had their properties raided and digital and personal assets confiscated.
	And they've been doing this and talking about doing this with the Alternative for Deutschland, AFD, Alternative for Germany.
	They have debanked people with AFD. They have said, if you have a gun license, which I can't imagine what it takes to get a gun license in Germany, can you imagine how you have to be vetted in Germany to have a gun license?
	But if they don't like your politics now, they'll take your gun license away from you as well.
	And so this article...
	Looks at it and says, so what is Compact Magazine?
	Well, guess what? I don't care.
	It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter what Compact Magazine is.
	I'm not going to sit here and put it on the weight.
	Well, do I agree with what they say or not agree?
	No. This is about free speech.
	And if it's about free speech, it really doesn't matter what that magazine was about.
	If you want to have a government that is not a totalitarian government, you better stop that kind of nonsense.
	So, one last thing here before we take a break.
	Google buries the Trump campaign website even in the thick of the Republican National Convention.
	As I said before, as we began with this, YouTube has become a quote-unquote search engine designed to hide things.
	They don't just hide my content, and they actively hide my content.
	As I said, you know, if I go to Google and look, I find a David Knight...
	I type in David Knight Journalist.
	I find a journalist professor that's up in the Pacific Northwest who has, I think, 900 followers.
	But they don't show me. And Google buries the Trump campaign website, even with all of everything happening during the convention, with the shooting and all the rest of this stuff.
	And these are the people that GARD works with, again, MRC-TV. MRC researchers looked at how Google completely eliminated Trump's website from the top 100 search results.
	From the top 100 search results.
	While pushing Biden's campaign website to the number one spot.
	How could they be any more biased?
	But I've seen this for years.
	And you know, when you look at this, this has been going on now for six years.
	And Trump never did anything.
	And when it happened, I said, all you Republicans, from Trump on down, all you Republicans who are not doing anything about this, guess what?
	You're coming up. Because here's somebody that's of interest to them.
	It was Michael Hayden who said, we're not interested in bad people, because they're bad people.
	We're not interested in bad people.
	We're interested in interesting people.
	Well, they take an interest in politicians, just like they take an interest in journalists.
	Researchers conducted three separate searches for the top three candidates' names, along with the words, Presidential Race 2024.
	The search engine did not display the candidate's campaign website.
	Trump, again, he didn't make the top 100.
	Can you imagine that?
	The bias of Google.
	Don't use Google.
	Don't use Google. You know of a website?
	Go directly to that website.
	Go to thedavidknightshow.com.
	We'll tell you where our content is.
	We'll tell you how you can support us as well.
	We'll be right back. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen.
	Your annual global risk report makes for a stunning and sobering read.
	For the global business community, the top concern for the next two years is not conflict or climate.
	It is disinformation and misinformation, followed closely by polarization within our society.
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You are listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right. Well, we've got something really strange that's going on.
	People are wondering if Biden is dead.
	He was last seen barefoot on a crosswalk in front of Abbey Road.
	Yeah. If you play Lala's last speech backwards, it says Biden is dead.
	But this is coming from Charlie Kirk.
	Not somebody that I put any trust in whatsoever.
	I see Charlie Kirk as a shameless grifter and sycophant to Trump.
	But this is very interesting, I thought.
	And a lot of people are talking about it.
	Is Biden alive? We've got Brett Baer at Fox News and all the contributors are asking him, where is he?
	This is really strange.
	And this is what Charlie Kirk said.
	I was passing on. He said, got a weird lead on a story that people should look into.
	And again, he's putting it out in a responsible way.
	He said, look, this is what somebody said.
	And he said, I've got a lot of these, actually.
	Several people have contacted him with the same story.
	He said, I can't verify this, but I've had a lot of people who have contacted me with the story.
	Can somebody out there research this, debunk it, or, you know, show that it's real?
	He said, I got a call from a source close to the Las Vegas Metro Police.
	The official story was that Biden's trip was cut short last week due to COVID. However, according to this source, U.S. Secret Service informed LV Metro that there was an emergency situation involving Biden and to close necessary streets so that POTUS could be transported immediately to University Medical, which they began to close down the streets in earnest.
	Then, mysteriously, there was a stand-down order, and the U.S. Secret Service informed local Vegas police department that they were going to medevac POTUS, President of the United States, to Johns Hopkins, which they presumed meant to fly him back east ASAP. Apparently, the rumor mill in the police department was that Joe Biden was dying or possibly already dead.
	I didn't think too much about this.
	It seemed too wild to be true.
	But given that Joe Biden has been out of public sight now for days and dropped out of the race via an ex-post, and that his brother James indicated that health was a factor, I'm beginning to grow more curious if COVID or something else has been more serious than reported.
	If anyone with the LV Metro has information, he's got his email address there and everything.
	He said, I'd like to hear that.
	And then he also posted up, he said, people sent me a post from Emily Gooden, senior White House correspondent for the Daily Mail.
	From that day, she documented that the flight time from Vegas to Dover was three hours and 48 minutes, extremely fast.
	And that the AF1 flew so fast that the quote, plane shook, unquote.
	This seems to confirm reports of how urgently AF-1 took off out of Vegas.
	And so the questions now are, did Joe Biden have a serious medical event in Vegas that has been covered up?
	Did that medical event contribute to his decision to pull out of the race?
	And how precarious is Biden's current health condition?
	Well, I think it's kind of...
	Interesting to say the least.
	And again, it was an abrupt reversal when I saw this stuff.
	I thought, yeah, you know, Biden and all the people around him, they do have a lot of power and they can take revenge on a lot of these people and they'll have a long time to do it if they push him out.
	You know, he doesn't leave office as president until the end of January next year.
	So he's got a lot of time to get even with people.
	And he's just the kind of guy to do it, you know?
	So I was kind of surprised at how quickly this whole thing flipped, except that, you know, in the middle of the week, they said, well, we're going, you know, he's going to resign, he's going to do it on Sunday night, and all the rest of the stuff, and it all happened.
	But on Fox News, Brett Baer and other people were talking about the fact that it was really strange that he did it all by...
	A tweet. And there's been no public appearance.
	There's been nothing from him at all.
	And this has been going on now for quite some time.
	It's been going on since the 17th.
	Here's what they said at the time.
	I want to go back to your previous statement, Dana, about not seeing President Biden today.
	I think as you think about what has transpired today since 1.45 p.m., not physically seeing him, even a dresser camera in Delaware, let alone an Oval Office statement like LBJ did when he dropped out in March of 1968, It is disconcerting, isn't it?
	Brett, they didn't even release a White House still photograph.
	Nothing. So are we, I mean, I hope he's fine.
	But you could forgive people for wondering if we are really living weekend at Bernie's right now.
	Like, proof of life, please.
	Let's see it, okay?
	We want the president to be okay.
	I do want him to be able to leave on a note that is high in his mind, right?
	So that he feels like he had this public service career, where he achieved the ultimate, and he's obviously unwell.
	And so, you know, we want him to be a person that can, like, Stand on his own TV and look the American people in the eye and explain why he's leaving.
	Because without that, imagine what your, again, your allies, your adversaries, your enemies, your military, your voters, are all sitting there going, well wait, so why are you withdrawing?
	Is it because of health?
	And if so, please let us know so we can pray for you.
	Is it because you were afraid you were going to lose?
	I mean, that's what Jared Moskowitz just said, the congressman from Florida, so that's interesting.
	I would note that while we've been on the air, the Pennsylvania governor, Josh Shapiro, has endorsed Kamala Harris, and she is one of the few people that has floated as a possible vice presidential nominee for him.
	She is kind of floaty, isn't she?
	I just don't think that anybody who watched the last week at the RNC can make an honest comparison about Joe Biden's cognitive decline that we've been watching and the 78-year-old Donald Trump.
	I don't think that's going to work.
	Well, it is interesting. And again, everybody is saying, you know, where is he?
	It's now been a very long time, you know.
	We're now coming up to about a week, and he's disappeared.
	Nobody's seen him. Is he that sick?
	You know, I thought when I saw this, I thought, well, he's kind of walking back and saying, well, you know, if...
	If health reasons or something, I may drop out.
	I said that he had COVID, but nobody has seen him.
	The reports of them rushing him around to take him to the hospital and putting him on a plane and flying him back and that type of thing.
	In fact, we haven't seen him. It's such a strange time, isn't it?
	Because, see, this election is really key.
	This election is going to be whoever is going to be in this position and the people around them.
	This is the tail end of the fourth turning.
	And we're going to see a lot of stuff.
	And it's coming really fast at us, isn't it?
	And it's going to get a lot stranger.
	We'll be right back. The Common Man.
	They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com Let's take a quick look at La La Land.
	Hillary Clinton has called her a brilliant prosecutor as Biden is supposedly stepping down and endorsing her.
	Hillary Clinton endorses her as well.
	A brilliant prosecutor. Yeah, a brilliant prosecutor of whistleblowers.
	Who were exposing murder for hire.
	That's what she did. That's one of the many things she did as a prosecutor.
	One of the most reprehensible deplorable things.
	Now, this is where Hillary Clinton should apply the word deplorable.
	It actually fits for Lala Harris.
	She's criticized because she locked a lot of people up for pot and then laughed about doing it herself and, of course, lied about it.
	She wanted to look as if she were cool.
	She has put over 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations, laughed about it when questioned, If she ever smoked marijuana, then eventually bragged about how she smoked marijuana in college and listened to such and such music.
	And people said, well, that music was not around when you were in college.
	What were you smoking?
	I don't know. She kept people in prison beyond their sentence in order to use them as cheap labor for the state of California.
	Said Tulsi Gabbard. Tulsi Gabbard also said she fought to keep the cash bail system in place that impacts poor people in the worst kind of ways.
	I disagree with Gabbard on that.
	I think bail and a cash system of bail is a good system.
	Without that, you know, Democrat people like Tulsi Gabbard and Young World Economic Forum leaders like Tulsa Gabbard, without the bail system, you wind up with the type of thing that you see in California with these Soros district attorneys.
	Now, bail is a good thing.
	And, you know, part of it is it gives somebody an opportunity to get out.
	It doesn't guarantee they're going to get out.
	And again, the bail is set by the judge who's going to take a person's circumstances under consideration.
	But the most important thing is that you've got somebody who has put up that bail, and they're going to watch that person pretty closely.
	And so what you're doing is you're actually bringing in some people who have a financial incentive to make sure they don't skip out or do something.
	But when you look at what you did to the Center for Medical Progress and to David Daleiden, when there was talk in Congress about how Planned Parenthood was doing murder for hire, harvesting baby parts and using them for experiments, And that was the basis of them beginning this, and they recorded people.
	So she came after them, not after Planned Parenthood.
	She left Planned Parenthood alone, even though these people bragged about how they were doing it for money, going to get Lamborghinis and all the rest of this stuff.
	And she was a prosecutor.
	The California Attorney General prosecuted them.
	I should say persecuted them.
	And then when she moved into the Senate, The person who replaced her was Javier Becerra, who is now head of HHS. And then he went into HHS. The prosecution continued.
	And what we learned was that the very organization that Javier Becerra is head of right now, HHS, which has NIH and Fauci's NIAID underneath it, That very organization was one of the key customers of the Murder for Hire.
	They're paying Planned Parenthood to send them baby parts.
	They were using it to create transhumanized mice.
	Putting these harvested baby parts in mice and then testing that thing.
	And as we pointed out many times, John Rapoport has pointed out, live action news, many pro-life organizations have pointed out the fact that you cannot do organ harvesting, whether it is in a Chinese prison and it's being done of prisoners, adult prisoners, or whether it is Planned Parenthood doing it in California with the protection and oversight of people like Lala Harris and Javier Rosario.
	And do the kind of things that you do in an abortion.
	You would be harming the organs.
	And so they have these babies born alive and they kill them.
	Lala Harris has delivered her first words since Biden is leaving the race.
	She phrased it as, we are now unburdened by what has been.
	I guess if you change the inflection of that, I've been unburdened by what has been.
	You mean Biden? That has been?
	It just depends on where you put the comma, right?
	It depends on where you put the comma law as to how you want to phrase that.
	Unburdened by what?
	Has been. Meanwhile, the actual president is nowhere to be seen, as I was just saying.
	It is strange days indeed, isn't it?
	And she is one strange character.
	By the way, one of the donors, big donor, John Morgan...
	They call him a mega donor as opposed to a MAGA donor.
	Mega donor John Morgan on Sunday announced that he will not fundraise for the Democrats if Lala Harris is the nominee.
	And then he suggested that Biden's decision to endorse her 30 minutes later after he announced he was pulling out was a big F you, he said, to those who pushed him out.
	Well, I don't know who's giving who the finger here with all this stuff.
	Whoopi Goldberg is whooping mad.
	She says that this idea of pushing Biden out over his age is horrific messaging, she said.
	And she said it really...
	Let's just say, got her angry.
	Not exactly the term she used.
	The messaging that we have put out to people over a certain age is horrific.
	We basically said, hey, you know what?
	We kind of think you're over a certain age.
	You don't really have what it takes to do the job that you're doing.
	That's the messaging that we put out.
	I'm bored of hearing that.
	Oh, okay. Well, she's not the only one who thinks that that was...
	Well, she didn't say she supports Lala.
	She doesn't like the pushing out of Biden.
	But you know that she will fall in line and support Biden.
	But we have all of the state party chairs have now endorsed Lala.
	Well, what would you expect?
	I mean, these people become the party chair by playing the game, by being sycophants and that type of thing.
	And they also raised $81 million.
	Very significant. You know, one of the things we were talking about was this big stash of cash.
	$91 million that was in the bank for the Biden-Harris campaign.
	And everybody's arguing back and forth.
	Well, what happens to that now?
	Most people said, well, if she runs, she gets to keep it.
	But if it's somebody else, doesn't have her name on it, it goes to the Democrats.
	So we'll see what happens.
	But when we come back, we're going to take a look at some of her policies.
	Yeah, she is even worse than Biden on gun control stuff.
	We'll be right back. Let me tell you, The David Knight Show, you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	Ha ha ha! And you want to know something else?
	You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at thedavidknightshow.com.
	That's a website.
	Yeah, well, uh, Harris, on guns, okay?
	Bye.
	She is further left on guns than even Biden.
	Her gun control agenda will make Biden's efforts to infringe on American Second Amendment rights look feeble and impotent, says the New American.
	And they reference what she had to say after Trump did his gun control by executive order, his bump stock.
	Remember that? Yeah, is everybody at the table?
	He's got Dianne Feinstein and Chuck Schumer and Mitch McConnell and everybody telling all these senators.
	John Cornyn is sitting next to him.
	Well, you know, you guys do what you need to do, and you pass all these different restrictions on guns.
	But, you know, the bump stock, don't worry about the bump stock.
	I've got that taken care of.
	Fortunately, I can do that myself.
	I don't need you to do that. I can do that by executive order.
	And I said at the time, I said, watch what the Democrats do with this.
	And it was just a day or so.
	Even though the New American is not saying, not bringing Trump into this at all, not bringing Trump's executive order into it at all.
	What she said immediately after that, she was the first one to take the bait.
	La-la was. And she said, So Trump says,
	well, I'm in the bump stock, and the NRA says, well, it doesn't matter.
	Bump stocks aren't important, and they're right.
	Bump stocks are not important, but it's the principle.
	And she picked up on the principle, and so did Biden.
	And she said, so I'll give Congress 100 days.
	If they don't do it, I'll start all these things by executive order.
	So she proposed to mandate near-universal background checks by requiring anyone who sells five or more guns per year to run a background check on all gun sales, to revoke the licenses of gun manufacturers and dealers that break the law and take the most egregious offenders to court, regardless of whether or not they are protected by the Protection of Commerce and Arms Act.
	That was a thing, saying that if you manufacture a product, like a gun, And it doesn't blow up in somebody's hand while they're shooting it.
	They're not liable.
	Any more than if somebody grabs a Ford Bronco and uses it to run people over at a Christmas parade, you can't sue Ford.
	This is Protection of Commerce and Arms Act.
	Because they already knew this was going to be the strategy of Democrats.
	The way she put it was to repeal the NRA's corporate gun manufacturing dealer immunity bill.
	Well, she's not talking about getting rid of the pharmaceutical company's immunities with the vaccines or anything.
	But these people have done nothing wrong if they're manufacturing a gun.
	If somebody uses a gun to harm somebody, they're the problem.
	Because a gun can be used to protect people as well.
	It can be used to keep the peace, not just to attack people.
	It can be a deterrent to crime, to tyranny as well.
	And that's exactly the purpose of the Second Amendment.
	It's not there for sports shooting.
	It's not there for hunting. It's not there even for self-protection.
	Primarily, it is there as a deterrent to a tyrannical government, just like we had the mutually assured destruction of nuclear arms throughout the 20th century.
	Close the boyfriend loophole to prevent dating partners convicted of domestic violence from purchasing guns and ban the AR-15 from being imported into the United States.
	And so, all of these things were on her list, and to that we would add, prohibit anybody convicted of a federal hate crime from buying guns.
	If they don't like what you have to say, this is another reason why the conservatives need to stop this cancel culture stuff that they're doing.
	Oh, well, okay. Hate crime, you talk about, you think that marriage is between one man and one woman?
	Okay, well, you're hateful.
	And we're going to convict you of that, and we're going to take your guns.
	That's what she wants to do.
	So, again, as I said earlier, Trump once donated to her campaign in California.
	From 2011 to 2013, he gave $6,000.
	Trump's daughter, Ivanka Trump, also donated $2,000 to Harris in 2014.
	Now, when people have pointed this out in the past, how he gave money to Hillary Clinton and all these other people, he said, you know, it's interesting.
	I was looking at the ones I'm running against.
	I've contributed to most of them.
	Can you believe it? He said. I've given to Democrats.
	I've given to Hillary. I've given to everybody.
	Because that was my job.
	I gotta give to them.
	Because when I want something, I get it.
	When I call, they kiss my butt, he said.
	So that's his job.
	His job is to buy influence.
	His job is to bribe politicians.
	That's his job. To get them to do whatever he wants because he gave them a little bit of money.
	Because, you know, Trump knows that the best return on investment...
	It is a politician. No doubt about it.
	And so, just to take a look at the coming Lala campaign, she's got a new Pennsylvania Deputy Press Secretary.
	This guy is Eric Lipka.
	There's what he looks like on maybe a work day or something.
	But here's what he does on weekends.
	He's a drag queen.
	Yeah, nothing different about her and Biden, I guess.
	They're all about that.
	And then we've been told that if you mispronounce her name, Whether it is Kamala or Kamala.
	Oh, if you mispronounce that, Mika Brzezinski says, you are guilty of hate speech.
	And maybe they could take your gun as well.
	Here's what she has to say about, be careful about how you talk about...
	Lala Harris.
	And I've heard from inside Republican circles and right-wing media that the hate campaign against Kamala Harris has begun.
	You'll notice they purposefully pronounce her name wrong.
	They say Kamala. They do it all the time.
	It is on purpose.
	But the talk is to start that hate campaign and get it going and start it churning.
	Oh yeah. There's a lot of people.
	I have trouble pronouncing their names, you know, like I played her earlier today.
	Ursula Fond of Lying.
	I really struggled at trying to pronounce it, so I just came up with something kind of described.
	Or, you know, Pete Boudiguet.
	Or Alexandria Occasional Cortex.
	And I talk frequently about Lala Harris.
	And, of course, when I refer to her as Lala, it's kind of ditzy, open, and I always used to think about, maybe you remember this movie, maybe you don't, it's pretty old.
	Annie Hall. Oh, well.
	La-dee-da, la-dee-da, la-la.
	Yeah, la-dee-da, la-dee-da, la-la.
	Yeah, that's what I think about.
	And, you know... Lala Harris doesn't need us to make fun of her.
	She doesn't need us to do satire.
	She does it herself.
	Good afternoon. I want to welcome these leaders for coming in to have this very important discussion about some of the most pressing issues of our time.
	I am Kamala Harris.
	My pronouns are she and her.
	I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit.
	And, um...
	So you're coming in to talk about some of the most pressing issues of our time.
	She and all the people there at the desk are wearing masks like idiots, not knowing that they don't do anything except make your face break out because you're eliminating waste and trapping it against your skin.
	And we're here to talk about some of the most pressing issues.
	I'm Kamala Harris. My pronouns are she and her.
	And she has to look down.
	Oh, and I'm wearing a blue dress.
	She has to look at her dress.
	Why does she even tell us what she's wearing?
	I mean, we can obviously see it.
	Was that for her own benefit to affirm with herself?
	Did I remember to put on the right dress today?
	I'm wearing a blue dress.
	And then she had this strange thing to say.
	About electric vehicles and depopulation.
	When we invest in clean energy and electric vehicles and reduce population, more of our children can breathe clean air and drink clean water.
	Oh, yeah. Okay.
	Well, yeah, more of our children, even after we depopulate them.
	I mean, it is going to be an interesting time coming up, and we'll be right back.
	🎵Music🎵
	♫
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	We've got a comment and a tip.
	Thank you, Radice Bro on Rumble.
	Thank you for the tip. He writes, if Biden is dead, why isn't the donor class letting Kamala, Lala, steer the ship in the illusion before she even runs?
	Yeah, who knows? Who knows what's going on?
	As a matter of fact, you know, they want to...
	Well, I can tell you that...
	If he's really dead and they're running this game, the reason that I would think that they would do this is because they want to keep the convention open.
	Even though you've had all of the Democrat Party's state chairs endorse her, and even though she's been given a lot of money by the donor class and that type of thing, they still want to try to put somebody else in there.
	Because other than Biden, everybody else polls higher than Lala does.
	And so a lot of people in the Democrat Party did not want to have her.
	As a matter of fact, I played for it yesterday.
	AOC doesn't like her.
	There's a lot of people who don't like her for one reason or the other.
	I think the Obamas, you know, whether or not they want to push Michelle in this time, they do see her as competition for Michelle's future aspirations, I think.
	And so there's a lot of people who want to have that there.
	So if she becomes president, it becomes a lot more difficult to get rid of her at the convention.
	So that might be the motive for why they would want to pretend that Biden is alive if he's not alive.
	I think it's going to be pretty hard to stretch it out for a month, though, if they were to do that.
	But who knows? I mean, we're seeing some really crazy stuff.
	Really crazy stuff here.
	Let's talk a little bit about some of the pressing issues, since they don't want to talk about them.
	They aren't going to talk about CBDC, for example.
	And in North Carolina, you had the legislature there, which is overwhelmingly Republican, but they do have a Democrat governor, Roy Cooper.
	He's one of the people who have been floated as a possible pick.
	Maybe not for president, but maybe for vice president or whatever.
	And so Roy Cooper, the Democrat governor in North Carolina, just vetoed a bill that would ban CBDCs in North Carolina.
	These are the pressing issues.
	These are really important. And this is what most people don't want to talk about in politics.
	They want to make it all about personalities.
	North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper has vetoed a bill banning the state from implementing a Federal Reserve-issued central bank digital currency despite receiving near-unanimous support In the state's House of Representatives and the Senate.
	So not just the majority Republicans, but near unanimous, including many Democrats.
	Cooper's veto followed a lopsided 109 to 4 vote.
	Again, we're You know, what do we got here?
	You know, 96-7% or something like that.
	And that was in the House.
	And in the Senate, nearly as lopsided.
	39-5.
	So, 109-4 in the House.
	39-5 in the Senate.
	Democrats and Republicans to stop this CBDC thing.
	And Cooper vetoed it.
	Is he really, you know, doing this so that he can get on the ticket?
	I mean, this is the type of thing that the globalists who run Washington want to see.
	At a state level, even the Democrats are pushing back against the CBD stuff.
	But, you know, the legislature.
	But not this guy.
	Given the near unanimous vote, North Carolina legislators could easily override his veto.
	They only need a three-fifths majority.
	They got way more than that.
	He vetoed only because his opponent, Mark Robinson, is in favor of the bill, they said.
	It's clear who the pro-Bitcoin and the pro-freedom candidate is here.
	Well, it may just be a pushback against Mark Robinson, but I think he's virtue signaling to the globalist donor class, frankly.
	Cointelegraph says...
	The digital asset policy, his statement rather, is digital asset policy must remain in the hands of the American people.
	How does that work out with CBDC? Ensuring that any development of digital currency reflects our values of privacy, individual sovereignty, and free market competitiveness.
	Oh, really? Cointelegraph responds and says, well, that said, Fed Chair Jerome Powell said at a Senate Banking Committee hearing in March that the U.S. was, quote, nowhere near recommending or let alone adopting a CBDC currency in any form.
	Well, if that were true, and it's not true, but if that were true, it'd be better to stop it.
	But folks, it's not true.
	It was in March of 2022 that Biden issued an all-hands-on-deck every organization in the deep state because they're all underneath the president.
	All of the bureaucracies were to do a study and report back to him in six months in September of 2022.
	Broke it down into four areas, as I said before.
	How do we completely redesign the financial system?
	That ought to be pretty crazy for people to pay attention to right away, shouldn't it?
	And shouldn't the Republicans have talked about that?
	So how do we completely redesign the financial system?
	How do we write the software for it?
	How do we use law enforcement to force people to do this?
	And then how do we market it by telling them that it's going to save power?
	It's a green thing to do.
	It's greener than Bitcoin, for example.
	These people don't care about consuming energy.
	As I point out many times, when you look at the surveillance state and what the NSA is doing, massive data centers, even putting them out in the desert in Bluffdale, Utah, and using more power, more electricity, and more water than an entire city, and doing it out in the middle of the desert?
	They don't care about saving you that stuff.
	And now we see that in spades with the artificial intelligence, the moves to put these nuclear reactors in.
	So, no, the CBDC stuff is something we all should be concerned about.
	We should all be concerned about the debanking that has happened.
	This article from European Conservative says, are we going to have banking by mob rule?
	We have a German bank, Volksbank, closes the AFD donation account.
	And, you know, as I said earlier, not only doing that, but also banning them from owning guns in a new court ruling.
	The case was initially brought by a married couple that owned over 200 firearms, held a legal permit to do so.
	But their permit was revoked due to their membership in a political party.
	The couple initially sued and lost this case.
	However, they now have also lost their appeal.
	As the court argues, the members of the party are suspected of anti-constitutional activities and are therefore unreliable.
	Based on current gun laws, you must be labeled as reliable.
	Makes me think of brother, who art thou?
	He's bona fide.
	He's bona fide. You've got to be bonified to own a gun.
	Earlier this year, the court in Munster, it's a monster court, already confirmed, or maybe we should just say it's cheesy, I guess, already confirmed the classification of AFD as a, quote, suspected threat to democracy after the AFD challenged this classification.
	Yeah, we can't have a political party that is opposed to the establishment.
	That would be a threat to democracy.
	Well, as Mises Institute says, it's all now MMT. It's all modern monetary theory.
	Or you could always say the magic money tree.
	The fraud of monetary policy.
	Modern monetary theory is not convincing the most trained economists of various schools of thought.
	As a matter of fact, you know, there's a lot of different schools of economic thought.
	The Austrian school and, you know, monetarists and Keynesians and all these other...
	These people would always have mathematical models and things like that to try to prove their case.
	Well, MMT is just hand-waving.
	It's the idiocracy of the economic schools.
	Ha! This causes a lot of them to balk at it, to mock it.
	Some of them say that it is warranted as absurdity, especially when you look at some of the more outlandish claims.
	And the writer of this at the Mises Institute says, was an Austrian critique of MMT. But there's also a fair amount of hypocrisy in the non-Austrian community, the mainstream economists, the Keynesian economists, the monetarist economists, critiques of MMT by mainstream economists.
	The truth is that most, if not all, of these economists share the same faulty presuppositions regarding what is euphemistically called monetary policy.
	So the difference, he said, between mainstream and MMT economist is usually one of degree, not of kind.
	In other words, in a sense, I guess you could say that the MMT people are essentially the same thing.
	They just threw out any attempts to try to justify it by math.
	Alan Greenspan, former Fed Reserve Chairman and part of Ayn Rand's inner circle, said, Most definitely not an MMT proponent made a very MMT friendly claim.
	He said the United States can pay any debt that it has because it can always print money to do that.
	And so there is zero probability of default, he said.
	Well, while this is literally true and it points to the fact that the nominal debt and the dollars are not the issue, it overlooks the distortionary consequences from this manipulation of the entire structure of production.
	Nevertheless, such a claim is often also repeated by proponents of MMT as if it contains some magic missing ingredient to unlock greater stores of wealth.
	This is why I call it the magic money tree.
	Not a modern monetary theory.
	It's not a theory. It's not tied to any math.
	It's just the magic money tree.
	So, MMT takes monetary policy concepts to their logical conclusions, as I always said.
	You know, when I took macroeconomics in college, it was kind of ridiculous.
	Oh, yeah, you've got to be very concerned about, you know, balancing your budget and everything.
	If you are, you know, for your household, you've got to be concerned about balancing your budget as a business.
	But, you know, if you're a government... It doesn't matter.
	You just float it.
	It's like a big balloon.
	When it gets even bigger, it just starts going up in the air.
	Absolutely nothing to worry about.
	By the way, if you want to get out of this bubble and have something that is going to give you some financial privacy and something that is going to be a little bit of wealth insurance, Go to davidknight.gold.
	Tony Arterman has set that up, and it'll take you to Wise Wolf Gold.
	You can start accumulating some wealth insurance in the form of metals, of gold and silver.
	You can start to accumulate that at Wise Wolf Gold and you can do that as part of a regular Part of a buying group he calls it the wolf pack and you can come in at different levels and You can get the group discounts as part of that group You can also of course buy any quantity of gold or silver Small or large through Tony and you can also do things with set up metals IRA And he can help you with all that stuff at Wise Wolf gold
	and silver and again to go to David Knight gold I'll take you to Tony and let him know that you came through us By the way, when we're talking about silver, The Economist in the UK, or the magazine, the publication, predicts exponential growth of solar power, but it fails to look at the scarcity of silver.
	They were breathlessly promoting solar power, saying that solar power is going to be so huge that solar power will become, quote, humankind's largest source of primary energy, not just of electricity, by the 2040s.
	What in the world? What kind of energy does it produce besides electricity?
	Solar panels, that was all they produced was electricity.
	There's a lot of confusion about that, just like there's a lot of confusion about carbon, right?
	I've seen reporters talk about...
	Carbon monoxide. We've got to eliminate carbon monoxide.
	It's like, well, yeah, that would be a good thing to not lock yourself in a garage with it because that'll kill you.
	But carbon dioxide is just what we breathe out.
	They get confused about that. They get confused about carbon itself.
	They're confused about a lot of different things.
	And, you know, when I was working with a group, I was trying to get...
	The data from Michael Mann that he used for his hockey stick lies that Al Gore used for his convenient lies documentary.
	One of the guys I was working with who used to work for the EPA, he said he'd go around and he'd ask me, what's your favorite source of energy?
	He said, it's always one person will raise their hand and say, electricity.
	It's like, no, electricity is the product of that.
	I don't know what these people are talking about.
	At The Economist, maybe they don't either.
	Solar power is going to be so huge, so huge, that it'll become humankind's largest source of primary energy, not just electricity.
	Maybe it's going to generate so much heat in these solar-powered farms that they'll be able to harvest that heat or something, like a volcano.
	The Economist is thought by some to be the ultimate contrarian indicator.
	After it famously called the end of the oil age in 2003.
	Well, I can do better than that. I've got the magazines right over here.
	1979. Newsweek and Time magazine called the end of the oil age.
	It was a CIA that called oil fossil fuels.
	It was a CIA that began the lie about peak oil and all the rest of that stuff.
	Why do you think they would do that?
	Not that difficult to understand.
	How fast is solar power growing?
	Well, if it grows exponentially, the average growth rate for the past five years at 23% per annum.
	And, of course, this is kind of a Malthusian extrapolation.
	You know, it's going to go up exponentially like this.
	But it's not going to happen that way because there are some constraints on that growth.
	Another article on the same issue of The Economist claims that Europe is facing a problem of ultra-cheap energy.
	Is that a problem? And is energy cheap?
	No, it's getting ridiculously expensive in Europe.
	These people are talking about contrarian.
	They're just simply wrong.
	Lying. After I got up from the floor, after falling off my chair and stopping laughing, I delved a little deeper to understand why the author had come to that conclusion of Europe facing ultra-cheap energy.
	It looks like the author has confused market value with cost.
	He said solar farms can only operate because they rely on generous subsidies.
	We pick up the difference between low or even negative market prices and the subsidized prices through our bills.
	And so when they look at the impact of silver...
	We need to look at where solar panel costs might be going.
	And to do that, we need to consider the silver intensity of solar power.
	The durability and the conductivity of silver makes it an essential ingredient in solar panels.
	The rapid increase in solar panel production and silver demand is having an impact on the price of silver.
	It says the solar panel market is moving towards a technology that uses about 15 milligrams of silver per watt.
	So a typical 400-watt panel would use 6 grams of silver.
	At today's price of around $30 per troy ounce this works out to $5.80 per panel or about 10% of the panels costs Why panels have really come down since I last got a solar panel?
	but again another argument for the Change in silver which as Tony has always pointed out seems to be very depressed, but again if you want to Get some insurance outside some wealth insurance outside of this Federal Reserve system Go to davidnight.gold and take you to Tony Ardeman.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, I want to talk a little bit about local politics and give you an example out of Tennessee and how a lot of very wealthy, big money, just like we've seen Soros do with district attorneys, is presenting itself here in local elections.
	We'll be right back. You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, as I've said many times, and it has never been, well, it's always true, as I say, it's never been more true, but it's always been true, that all politics is local.
	You need to understand what the designs and what the agendas of the globalists are.
	But your best way of stopping it, perhaps your only way of stopping it, is going to be at the local level.
	Here's the example. You know, we've been talking about the power-hungry artificial intelligence data centers.
	Even more power-hungry than the NSA's data centers, all of them designed to spy upon us, thousands of Marylanders are furious about imminent domain risk for new transmission lines that would be used to power artificial intelligence data centers.
	Well, that's going to be one part of it.
	We've got to take your property so we can run these power lines, these massive power lines for it.
	Or maybe they will just rubber stamp at warp speed these small nuclear reactors that these people want.
	Then they don't have to run the power lines.
	Can you imagine, you know, just speeding up this whole regulatory process for these nuclear reactors all over the place?
	Which is what I think they're going to try to do.
	And then what's going to happen with the nuclear waste coming from these reactors?
	Are they going to be just as careless with that as they have been in terms of vaccines and other health issues as well?
	AI data centers that draw massive amounts of power.
	When construction sites are selected, power is apparently an afterthought.
	No problem for the nearsighted technocrats, however, who can simply force the state to make massive land grabs from farmers or property owners to erect power lines from afar.
	As a matter of fact, it's not just going to be land grabs so they can run the power from the existing power plants.
	But they will do power grabs as well.
	Literal power, you know, electric power grabs from people.
	I can see them getting first priority.
	If not, you know, well, sorry, you can't have any electricity for your home.
	We've got to be running these AI computers to spy on you to do biometric matching and all the rest of this stuff.
	The technocrats simply force the state to make massive land grabs from farmers and from property owners to wreck power lines from afar.
	Residents are furious about devastating businesses, farms, and property values.
	Because, again, all politics is local.
	And when you look at what is happening here in Tennessee...
	We've got an election coming up pretty soon in Tennessee, the primaries, the general election, of course, at the same time of the fall, but they have not had the primaries for state elections yet.
	They had the primaries for president earlier, but the primaries for the state elections are coming up at the beginning of August.
	And Senator Nicely, who I've had on several times, and I've got to say, you know, I've never had a politician That was more aligned with my political beliefs than Senator Nicely.
	And the thing I like about him is he doesn't just see where the problems are.
	He works to focus on solutions.
	And he's come up with some very good solutions.
	And he's the kind of guy who is affable, nice, nicely, yeah.
	And in a nicely way, he explains to his colleagues and builds a consensus around all this stuff.
	And as we showed yesterday, we had somebody mention it, we showed it, said, man, look at this, there's an amazing amount of money behind this.
	And so I started looking, and I found this article from Tennessee Conservative News.
	And I said, don't fall for the left's tricks.
	We got woke billionaires, friends of Soros, sending mailers to vote no on a true conservative, Frank Nicely.
	Vicious lies, from what I know, and I know him, I know the policies, I know this guy's lying about it.
	This guy doesn't show a picture of himself.
	I had to go searching to see what this guy that's running against him, his name is Jesse Seals.
	I had to go searching to find a picture of him to see what he looked like.
	There's no picture of him on Ballotpedia.
	There's no information about him anywhere.
	He's kind of running this stealth campaign.
	As the Tennessee conservative said, he says, I can't find any property records to show this guy owns anything.
	He doesn't have any work experience that he's got.
	He's just out of nowhere.
	And he doesn't talk at all about his vision or his issues or things he wants to accomplish.
	Instead, he does these attack ads on Nicely, which are absolutely false.
	And so a lot of people are wise to that.
	But the Tennessee conservative went a little bit deeper.
	And they did a deep dive.
	And let me show you what he put up here.
	Here's what they found.
	Don't fall for the left's tricks, again.
	But the key thing is down there in the corner.
	Can you zoom in a little bit on that, Travis?
	I want people to see that chart there, the Walton Family Foundation.
	And how foundational those people are to...
	And it's not just nicely.
	There's several Republicans in Tennessee, conservatives, that are being targeted by some of the same money that's there.
	She's tied very closely to...
	I think she's the chair of or sitting on the main advisory committee for the...
	Here it is. She is on the Board of Trustees.
	For the Aspen Institute.
	You remember when I talked to a reporter from Aspen, a conservative reporter, about how ostracized he was there because of the Aspen Institute and how left-wing it is and how it's all these billionaires that are associated with that?
	Well, that's exactly what's going on.
	And there are several conservative candidates for House and Senate.
	This is why I'm talking about this.
	Not just because it's nicely, but because...
	Several candidates, and this is probably happening in your state as well.
	We've seen Soros and these billionaires target district attorneys, and we've seen the damage that these people can do.
	And now they're starting to do that with state legislators.
	And especially with Nicely, because he's kind of been a fly in the ointment for a lot of their plans.
	So not only are these organizations, this was also Channel 5 in Nashville also investigated this.
	By the way, Tennessee Conservative, he did a video.
	I put it up on, I retweeted it on Twitter.
	And he said, you know, when you see out-of-state money coming in, you know it's not coming from conservatives.
	That doesn't happen.
	And so that was one of the reasons they started doing this investigation.
	So he did it. He also had Channel 5 in Nashville.
	He said, not only are these organizations in lockstep with each other, but they've petitioned for money from the Walton Family Foundation and so forth.
	They have given money to Tennessee Democrats.
	As well, I mentioned several of them here.
	The Walton Family Foundation spends most of its annual philanthropic dollars on educational causes.
	Carrie Walton Penner is the Education Committee and a known Democrat, along with her brother and other staff members of the Walton Family Foundation.
	She's also on the Board of Trustees for the Aspen Institute.
	And, again, when you...
	Look at the types of things that Nicely has been involved in.
	He sponsored the bill to let people buy ivermectin in the middle of stuff.
	He had a bill to nullify the COVID protocols, lowering taxes, and also mainly what we got started talking to him about was the CBDC and efforts to have some kind of a system at the state level and individual levels to facilitate people being able to have some kind of a hedge, essentially, against Federal Reserve mismanagement.
	But again, there were several articles on the Tennessee conservative news about this and what is happening.
	and what is happening.
	And he went through, he said, well, here's the voting record if you want to look to see who the real conservative is.
	And, of course, not only has this other guy not been in office, so he has no voting record, but he hasn't responded to any of the votes.
	Ballotpedia or these other things to say what his position is on any issues.
	And I went to his website. Nothing there.
	The most generic, bland, non-committal, non-statement I've ever seen of a candidate.
	And who is this guy?
	We don't even know who he is from a personal standpoint.
	But when you look at, again, like I said, nicely nullifying federal COVID restrictions, I'm just going to run through some of these things because, you see, this is the type of state representative that people like Soros are going to target first.
	And if they come after the people who do things like nullifying the COVID restrictions, voting for medical freedom to say that state and local governments are not allowed to require or mandate that a private business require proof of vaccination, that was one of the
	Pro-life policy, parental rights in education, protecting the innocence of children, to make sure that the schools are not putting out obscenity and pornography in their resources to the kids.
	Preventing modern-day racism.
	Again, prohibiting critical race theory and saying that institutions of higher education are Colleges will not require that students or employees embrace divisive teaching as a stipulation for any grade, diploma, employment opportunity, or tenure. Making ivermectin an over-the-counter drug.
	He actually sponsored that at Got Passed.
	Opposing the funding of abortion by local governments.
	Shielding minors from inappropriate drag shows.
	Voting for parental rights and undoing Tennessee's mature minor doctrine.
	They tried to use that To allow kids to get vaccinated without their parents' consent here in Tennessee.
	And that got shot down by the legislature.
	He was part of that.
	Sponsoring legislation to limit foreign ownership of property in Tennessee.
	he's come on this program, warning people how, not just in Tennessee, but in many states, they are setting people up for a trap with conservation easements to essentially take over their land eventually.
	And then this bill, which is really key, sponsoring a bill to limit out-of-state funding for Tennessee candidates, which is exactly what we're talking about with this opponent here.
	He was a prime sponsor of this bill, even though it failed to get out of the subcommittee.
	It sought to limit contributions for state political candidates coming from outside the state.
	It would have prohibited a candidate or political campaign committee from accepting contributions that exceed 30% of the total contributions received by a candidate or a political campaign committee from persons who are not residents of the state at the time the contribution is made.
	Unfortunately, that didn't get passed.
	And so now we've got a guy who is...
	They focus in on somebody who's going to stop that kind of stuff and actually give that person the money.
	Again, protecting the unborn, making it a felony offense for adults to participate in abortion trafficking, assisting minors in getting an out-of-state abortion without parental consent, stiffening penalties for crimes committed by illegal aliens.
	Are you starting to get the idea as to who the real conservative is here?
	It's kind of interesting, again, to see this.
	Oh, and one other, too, right?
	We talked about this last time Nicely was on.
	Sponsoring a bill that allows farmers freedom in how they raise livestock.
	He knows and is a friend of Thomas Massey and the two of them talked about it. Massey introduced at the federal level as the Prime Act. He's doing the same type of thing at the state level.
	Removed authorization of the bill, the sponsored bill, would have removed authorization for the Commissioner of Agriculture and the state veterinarian to order vaccination of livestock and would have specified that there is no state legal requirement to vaccinate livestock.
	The bill was sent to summer study at the Agriculture and Natural Resources Subcommittee. See, even the ones that don't get passed, you can see that he understands where the existential threats are.
	And he's taken measures to stop it.
	And so you can understand why they would focus on stopping him.
	That's really what we're looking at here.
	And that's going to be happening in your state as well.
	I can't go through and tell everybody where it is.
	By the way, pull up the picture so people can see his opponent.
	Everybody's seen Senator Nicely.
	GOP State Senate candidate deletes equity and entitlement statements.
	Travis is the article.
	And there he is.
	Would you buy a used car from this guy?
	I don't think I would. But he doesn't sell used cars.
	I don't know what he sells, except he's peddling wise.
	But I don't know what he does for a living.
	There's absolutely no biographical information whatsoever on his website.
	And no information about his issues.
	Biggest red flags I have ever seen in an election.
	Pretty amazing to see this kind of stuff right here.
	And that's where the fight is, folks.
	Again, if you go to Ballotpedia, you'll see a picture of him, just a black silhouette.
	This guy doesn't even put his picture there on Ballotpedia.
	On Rockfin, Duke Newcomb.
	Thank you very much for the tip.
	He says, the one thing to thank AJ for is introducing us to David Knight.
	Well, thank you. I actually did have a life before that.
	A lot of people don't think, you know, Alex brought me into existence, but...
	Well, thank you. That's very kind.
	And, yeah, it was and is an interesting life, and we'll do what we can with your support.
	And thank you so much for your support today, folks.
	And pay attention to what is happening at the local level.
	This is an important election.
	Not for what's happening in Washington, but for what's happening locally and at the state level.
	Have a good day. Let me tell you, the David Knight Show, you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	Ha ha ha! And you want to know something else?
	You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at thedavidnightshow.com.

▲