Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 22, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:02:42

The David Knight Show - 07/22/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	Using free speech to free minds.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday the 22nd of July, Year of Our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to begin, unfortunately, with the, and I say unfortunately because I'm sad to see the guy go, but Biden is leaving.
	We're going to talk about that insurrection, and we're going to talk about who's next, but we're also going to talk about who's running.
	It's more important to look at who's making these decisions.
	And to look at who the people are that are controlling not only Biden, but also Trump.
	Same people that are running the show at Bilderberg.
	Same people that are pushing for universal basic income.
	And yet, we have all of the Republicans falling down and worshipping Trump.
	Yes, it is a miracle.
	Truly is a miracle, they say.
	Well, we'll take a look at an interesting parallel about somebody else that was saved from an assassination attempt.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, before we get into the insurrection and the resignation...
	Well, he didn't actually resign.
	He's dropping out of the race, but he's staying as president, which is exactly what Mark Halpern had said last week.
	And I pointed out on Friday, yeah, it looks like that's the way it's going now.
	And yet there were still indications that there was a lot of fighting that was going on.
	Still at the very last minute, you had Bill and Hillary sidling up to Biden.
	But of course, this is what people do in politics.
	They are moving for their own purposes.
	And it's interesting to see everybody predicting who is going to take his place as if it matters.
	And this is what I want to talk to you about.
	It doesn't matter.
	These people are being run by the same people that run Davos.
	They run Bilderberg.
	It's the corporate technocracy that is sidling its way in here.
	The donors are putting a lot of pressure on all this stuff.
	But everybody's got their favorite, you know, we're going to play this what-if game.
	It is a reality TV show.
	And so you got a lot of people say, well, it's going to be Michelle Obama.
	Other people say it's going to be Hillary Clinton.
	Other people say it's going to be Gavin Newsom and on and on.
	Lala Harris is a lot of people are saying that even inside the Democrat Party, they want to push her out.
	And there's reasons for that.
	That began with a dollar sign.
	They want to get rid of Lala Harris.
	So we're going to talk about this.
	They said, we're going to follow an orderly procedure based on rules.
	No, you're not. You just threw away all of your rules about doing this stuff.
	So we'll talk about whether or not there's going to be legal challenges, any basis for these legal challenges, exactly how this works.
	It's important for people to see how this works.
	Because it's this ignorance of the political system that predicates people's worship of politicians.
	It predicates people putting their faith in Washington, the district of criminals.
	And if you see how this is all being done, it's like seeing sausage being made.
	And you may not want that if you see the ingredients that are going into this and the process of how this is working.
	That's my point in doing this.
	Otherwise, this is just a silly professional wrestling exercise like you saw at the RNC with Hulk Hogan.
	You know, the outrage, ripping my shirt off.
	Yeah! You want a piece of me?
	Yeah, come and take it!
	That type of thing. So, we'll take a look at all this stuff.
	But I want to begin with a brief recap of where we were last week.
	And as we were about midweek, and of course, the Republicans were sucking all of the oxygen out of the media between the shooting in Pennsylvania and the RNC convention.
	Nobody was talking about the Democrats.
	And isn't it interesting that as soon as that all ended, now this is running.
	It's almost like it was a script.
	Because it is a script.
	It is a pageant.
	It is a wag the Biden, as I said the longest time.
	It's exactly like that.
	They planned this out meticulously.
	Meticulously planned. And I said this from the very beginning.
	I said, look at how far ahead they put the debates.
	Never been done before.
	And gave him plenty of opportunity to flush the guy out.
	And then the same people that were raising money for him, Clooney and Obama, immediately said, well, you know, he can't run.
	They knew all that. We all knew all that.
	There's no way that they didn't know it.
	And so that's why they scheduled the debate so early.
	Why they scheduled the convention so late.
	And why they've only scheduled one more debate.
	All of this is to prepare the public.
	And I say this because you do have these people, even though they're being run by the same people.
	There is a very real competition for these people.
	It's very real for them, this Game of Thrones.
	There's a lot of money and power, which is the only thing these people respect.
	A lot of that is at stake.
	That's what helps to sell the illusion.
	It's to have these people who are completely in it for their own personal selfish reasons.
	So... About midweek last week, we were told that Biden had tested positive for COVID-19, had mild symptoms, and he was like, I'm getting better.
	You know, they plop him over the head and throw him in the cart anyway.
	But, you know, when we go back and we look at the vaccine that he pushed so hard, Trump's vaccine that he pushed and mandated everywhere, as that was coming out in Saudi Arabia, they had a Saudi national study That said most of the people that they looked at who were vaccinated experienced the disease shortly afterwards.
	And sometimes not just a respiratory disease, but of course, as we've seen and been reporting for years, many other situations, 82% of them had a side effect.
	This is coming from trial site news.
	And so... They would get what they called COVID. Or they would get sick in other ways.
	And so, it's not effective.
	And it's not safe.
	As a matter of fact, isn't it kind of interesting that we could say the same thing about both the Trump and Biden administrations?
	Ineffective and unsafe.
	Ha! And that should be declared illegal.
	A team of researchers in Saudi Arabia looked at subjects that were Saudi participants both genders ages 16 and up who had received at least one dose of any available vaccines in Saudi Arabia.
	The results of this study are troubling to say the least.
	Well, I guess we can just kind of dismiss this, say, well, this only has this kind of outcome with Arabs, right?
	We don't have to worry about it if we're not Arabs.
	See, this is the elephant in the room that nobody talked about at the RNC. Nobody talked about the wonderful Trump shots.
	Did you hear Trump beating his chest?
	I'm the father of the vaccine.
	All you people out there, you don't really like it, but you should.
	It's great. It's sugar water.
	Take it for Trump, right?
	None of that. None of that.
	His surrogates and media were not telling you it was sugar water.
	They're just ignoring it and hoping that you forget.
	I'm not going to forget. I'm going to keep reminding you, as a matter of fact, and you need to keep reminding other people of what was done in 2020 when this guy stabbed us in the back, when he destroyed the Constitution, when he set up medical martial law, when there was a coup against our Constitution.
	And the coup and the martial law were soft this time around.
	It's going to be much harder next time because they are hardening these precedents that are there.
	You want to know who's responsible for all this stuff?
	We should start calling the pandemic a whodunit because it was the who.
	It was the World Health Organization and people of that ilk.
	It was that cabal, that globalist public health cabal.
	They done it. We know exactly who done it.
	It was the who. Don't get fooled again.
	An overwhelming identification of side effects, plus nearly 13% of the vaccinated shortly thereafter experienced other diseases, raising troubling implications based on the accumulation of studies suggesting problems.
	This is not anything new, but I will keep giving you studies as they're finally being done.
	You see, this is one of the reasons why when President Trump said, well, you've done it faster than anybody else, this is why it takes time.
	You should be doing a test before you vaccinate billions of people with something that's never been tried before.
	Except it has been tried, and they knew that it was killing people, and they rolled it out anyway, just like the RSV vaccines I talked about last week.
	You had in their clinical trials 12 infants who died.
	Well, let's do it anyway.
	Now we've had another two that died right after getting the shot within hours.
	And we've known this for a very long time.
	Sudden infant death syndrome and many other things.
	I've played for you the tearful realization of a mother.
	I poisoned my child.
	I thought I was doing the right thing.
	She finally realized when they started playing these same games, calling it sudden adult death syndrome of the vaccinated, she realized that's what SIDS was.
	So when are people going to realize what was done to them?
	Well, we've got the big spectacle.
	We've got the shooting and all the rest of this stuff.
	We don't need to worry about what happened in 2020.
	As Tim Pool said, that's so four years ago.
	But they keep talking about other things that happened four years ago, like the election.
	Oh, that's not over for them.
	But all the stuff that Trump did leading up to the election, even what Trump did to destroy the election, he was the one responsible for vote-by-mail, folks.
	It wasn't Biden. It was Trump.
	And so, is Trump a chump?
	Or did he do it in conjunction with these people, these globalists, who are now going to get a lot of money from these technocrats, these Davos Bilderberg people?
	They're ponying up the cash as soon as he put in their VP candidate.
	So I said, better, larger, real-world studies should be funded.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Post-vaccinated registry, we should have one of those.
	And 68% of the people in this study in Saudi Arabia got the Pfizer vaccine.
	And Saudi Arabia is kind of significant for them because they got 80% of the population vaccinated.
	68 million.
	How many of those people are going to die or have died already from this stuff?
	How many millions of people is Trump directly responsible for the death of?
	By using your taxpayer money to create a poison and send that shot around the world.
	And then Biden turning it in on Americans specifically, just as everybody else is mandating it as well.
	That was the plan. It was a tag team.
	You know, Hulk Hogan says, this is the best tag team I've ever seen.
	You're talking about Trump and Vance?
	No. The best tag team is Trump and Biden.
	Trump, Biden, Trump, right?
	Back and forth. Shuffle.
	The most recent study published in the International Journal of Health Sciences points to a very high rate of reported undesirable effects, as they say.
	Yeah, death is an undesirable effect.
	Being a cripple the rest of your life, that's an undesirable effect, isn't it?
	Totaling 82% of the study's participants...
	So that's in Saudi Arabia.
	So let's go back to the politics behind all of this stuff and the agendas behind all of it.
	And of course, what we were hearing last week was first Biden said, well, I'm not moving out unless God wants me to.
	In other words, you can take me out feet first.
	We've seen these politicians do this over and over again.
	And at the beginning of this, I really thought he was going to hang on to power because I've seen that happen with Dianne Frankenstein, who they were complaining about the fact that because of her seniority, she was presiding over the Judiciary Committee.
	They couldn't get judges appointed for the Democrats because she had to do it, and she was gone so much of the time.
	And even when she was there...
	She was not there. It was a big problem.
	She had completely checked out.
	And then prior to that, we had Darth Vader Ginsburg, who didn't want to leave the Supreme Court.
	And so they were angry about that, because that allowed Republicans to get another pick in there.
	But I still thought that he had enough power that he would keep it.
	And they were very reluctant at the beginning to start to come out.
	And then it gradually built.
	This whispering campaign that began.
	The donors and so forth.
	And so last week, what we saw was, as he announced that he had COVID, he had also said, well, I may drop out for health reasons.
	And then he says, I've got COVID. I was like, uh-oh.
	Looks like, you know, not uh-oh, but it looks like he's going to drop out.
	And then we had the statement from Mark Halperin, who I think it was, I think he made it on Thursday.
	I covered it on Friday. And he was very specific about the insiders, and I read you what it was, but the key points were that Biden was going to resign, and it would happen on Sunday.
	He said this on Thursday. And he said he's not going to resign.
	He's going to drop out of the race, but he's not going to resign the presidency.
	And I said at the time, it's because they don't want to see Lala Harris in there for a number of reasons.
	She's not well liked.
	They want to get to the money that is there as part of the campaign coffers and so forth.
	And it's all going exactly according to plan.
	And I'll tell you what their plan is specifically.
	You've got an op-ed piece that was also put out just hours before Biden resigned, talking about what a hero he would be if he resigned, how well he would be loved by everybody.
	And how the process is going to operate.
	Done by people who are on the inside.
	People who are running the DNC. Zogby and another guy, former governor, who is high ranking on the DNC as well as having been on the rules committee.
	And so they talk about how they're going to set this thing up.
	And we'll talk about that coming up.
	But all this was just building up to last week.
	And he says, well, you know, if I'm sick, maybe I'll resign.
	Then he says, oh, I've got COVID. You'd had Adam Schiff, who is nothing but a mouthpiece for Pelosi.
	If Biden is our nominee, we will lose everything, he said.
	Schumer said best for him to drop out.
	Obama was really behind the Clooney op-ed piece.
	Clooney had shown it to him, gotten his comments on it, whether or not Obama gave him talking points or whatever.
	It was very clear that Obama was orchestrating this from the back and that Pelosi was orchestrating it from the back.
	Schumer then comes out publicly about it.
	CNN and other media were preparing the public for it by telling everybody, look, Trump has got 330 electoral votes.
	It's going to be a rout.
	So there's all that stuff that is happening.
	Because they're preparing people that they're going to change horses in midstream.
	But that was always the plan.
	So, the one thing that I thought was, well, maybe, you know, he's going to push back on this.
	Biden came back with a plan to come after the Supreme Court.
	He wanted to put limits on the Supreme Court, term limits and other things like that, which has been a Democrat fantasy.
	Not going to happen. Absolutely will not happen.
	They don't have the votes to do that, and there's not going to be that kind of a sea change to give them the votes.
	But this is virtue signaling to the left wing of his party.
	And then we saw this.
	How the DNC plans to run out the clock for Biden.
	This was also coming out at the end of the week, last week.
	But I believe that it was Mark Halpern was right.
	But their idea was that they were going to do an early virtual convention.
	And this has a lot to do with...
	Whether or not they can replace the nominee.
	And we'll talk about that in terms of who's next and how it's going to be done.
	But one of the reasons they were talking about this was because already, since they had moved their convention so late, and then moved the debate way to the front.
	So this is a long-term plan.
	When you look at stuff like this, We're good to go.
	They completely, by manipulating the dates and everything, and their convention was so late that they ran afoul of the law in Ohio that had a deadline.
	They had to have their deadline in by August the 7th, I think it was, and I think the convention begins August the 19th.
	So the Republican governor, DeWine, said, well, we'll make accommodations for that.
	I mean, we don't want to have an election without Republicans and Democrats on the ballot.
	And yet, the Democrats said, well, I don't know if we can trust this Republican governor.
	So let's have a virtual convention.
	So there was already some talk about that.
	So the Biden camp seized on that and said, yeah, let's do that early convention.
	If they did the early convention, August the 7th, once he was nominated, now it's a whole new ballgame.
	And so this really was where the fight was.
	Now the DNC plans to run the clock out for Biden.
	This is from Axios. Once Biden receives votes from the majority of nearly 4,000 delegates, it'll become exceedingly difficult to remove him from the presidential ticket.
	The DNC's current plan is to train state party chairs next week, they wrote this last week, on how to conduct the electronic voting in a secure way.
	The window for voting is likely to open on July 29th.
	And conclude by August the 5th, a virtual roll call, and they said, for the 81-year-old Biden, time may finally be on his side.
	Oh, like Mick Jagger, right? Yeah, they're both the same age. Mick Jagger's in a lot better shape than Joe Biden is. Time is on my side. No, time is not on any of our sides, folks. That is an illusion. It is not on our side.
	It is not on Biden's side either. And so that was going to be one of the things that he could do to And so there was a fight over this.
	The anti-Biden Democrats rushed to block the DNC's virtual nomination scheme, as Zero Hedge reported.
	And here's the lesson, you see.
	It's absolutely true that Biden did not want to go, and Jill did not want him to go, and so forth.
	And this guy's the president.
	I mean, can't he do it?
	He's not only, he said, running his campaign.
	Biden said, I'm running the world.
	Is that an illusion?
	He bought into it.
	Look, if Biden, if the president can't get what he wants out of this, This is why, when you vote, you don't get what you think you're going to get, even if the president is on your side.
	Time's not on your side, but you may think that the president's on your side.
	Well, he's not on your side either.
	But if he were, let's just imagine for a moment that he is, and that you coincide on some issue.
	The president wants it, really does, just like Biden wanted to stay in the presidency.
	He can't pull it off if he can't get the people with money to support him.
	He can't pull it off if they organize to push back on it.
	See, this is the way Washington works.
	So stop about the fantasies of there being some benevolent dictator.
	And you know, that's a really sad thing, how many people want a dictator, both on the left and on the right.
	There's a poll coming out showing that.
	I don't need a poll to tell me that.
	You can read the room.
	These people want Trump to save the world, or Biden or whoever they're going to put in there to save the world.
	They want a strong, authoritarian president.
	I do not. I want a weak president.
	There's not much that the federal government really needs to do.
	And they are already into too much of our life, and they can't do it.
	You see, the problem is, what we see with Biden, is that not only is time not on his side, But also, like Mick Jagger said, you can't always get what you want.
	As a matter of fact, you rarely do, even if you're the president, because it's this vast machine.
	And it's like, who's really running this thing?
	Is it even people who are running it?
	I personally don't think so.
	I think it's one of the reasons why it's so unwieldy.
	They aren't capable of delivering for you.
	They aren't capable of delivering for themselves.
	Right? As I've said many times about Trump.
	Okay, so he was owned by the deep state, was he?
	Yeah. Okay, so what makes you think he's going to do it differently the second time around?
	He was owned by Goldman Sachs and the military-industrial complex.
	He was owned by Big Pharma and all the rest of the stuff.
	So who's going to own him this time?
	Probably some of the same people, plus the people in Silicon Valley, plus people like Musk, who by himself, giving him $180 million.
	You see, it's a big club and you ain't in it.
	But guess what? Even those who are in it don't run it.
	Completely. There's another club that is there, above and beyond that.
	And, of course, as far as people are concerned, it is the money.
	And so the mega-donors are plotting to change Biden's mind with money.
	This is what we're saying. This is a recap of all the stuff that was happening as everybody was focused on the RNC last week.
	Will it work, they said.
	And when you talk about the mega-donors...
	That are manipulating Biden and we're able to push him out.
	Just consider Musk, $180 million between now and the end of the election.
	As I said, that's more than Al Gore and George W. Bush spent combined on everything in 2000.
	One man, one man, 24 years later, is going to spend more than the two of them combined.
	We're going to talk about mega donors, talk about MAGA donors as well.
	And coming up, we're going to talk also, what does Elon Musk want from this?
	What is his agenda?
	They're dangling money to members of Congress who say the right things.
	They're withholding money from those who do not.
	And they do this on every issue that is critical to the agenda.
	And so right now, you look at it and you say, well, are they doing this because they really want Biden to win?
	Or are they doing this because they want Trump to win?
	When you look at the different moves that are being made on the chessboard, you see, the very best were pawns on their 4D chessboard, if you want to talk about this being 4D chess.
	Nobody's being upfront and candid and honest with you in Washington.
	Withholding money from those who don't do what they want, even the most reclusive donors were talking to reporters on the record about the turmoil in the Democrat Party establishment.
	Tom Strickler, founder of the Hollywood talent agency WME, said he recently met in L.A. with Senator Martin Heinrich, Democrat of New Mexico.
	And he told Heinrich, if you don't publicly call for Biden to step aside, you're not getting a dime from me.
	Strickler said he'd also been planning to give maximum legal amounts in August to each of the seven most vulnerable Democrat Senate candidates, but that, as of now, he would not be supporting them because they have not broken with Biden.
	It's a message that I've encouraged my friends to send as well.
	If you back Biden, you will lose our support over and out, and they do this type of thing with every issue.
	You think your vote matters?
	And even George Soros doesn't want to play this foolish game.
	There's so many of these people out there giving money, and people like Elon Musk is going to flood it with $180 million and so forth.
	An advanced auction of stolen goods.
	That's what an election is. That's what H.L. Mencken said 100 years ago, and he's absolutely right.
	So, you think that you're going to get what you want out of Washington?
	Biden can't get what he wants out of Washington.
	And there's a lot of mega-donors.
	With a lot of money, and they're telling the senators and the president what to do.
	That's the takeaway from this that's important.
	That's far more important than if it's going to be Obama or Hillary or Gavin or you name it.
	We can play that guessing game.
	But this is the takeaway, folks.
	You don't have a seat at that table.
	You don't have a voice in this election.
	And you don't have a vote in this election either.
	You've got something of a say in the local elections.
	All politics are local.
	They've been telling you that. Even Elon Musk, who's just kicked in $180 million, says local elections are more powerful and more leverage even than the federal elections.
	Isn't that interesting? But even though he realizes that truth, and he talks about that because that's what George Soros is doing, he said you need to pay attention to him.
	What is Elon Musk doing at the local level?
	But more importantly, how convinced is he that he's going to get exactly what he wants from Trump and from J.D. Vance?
	That's the key thing.
	I think that $180 million is there for J.D. Vance.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to take a look at what is next.
	But we're also going to take a look at the Republican side as well.
	Stay with us, we'll be right back.
	♪♪♪
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, before we, I've got just a couple more things I want to talk about in terms of this switcheroo that the Democrats are doing right now, but I'd like to ask you all, if you will, please like the stream wherever you're watching it.
	I want to remind you about Subscribestar, and I've got some bad news about Cash App.
	They seem to have blocked us now.
	Really strange what's happened.
	They've made a lot of changes in their terms of service.
	First, they wanted a password to my bank account.
	There's no reason they need to have that in order to take the money out.
	All they need is a bank routing number and an account number.
	That's what everybody else uses.
	They don't need the password. I looked at that in...
	The bank said, you know, they want your password.
	They're going to be able to do everything.
	And it's like, yeah, I'm not doing that.
	And so I set up a separate account that would just be a place that I'd dump that.
	Open it up at a different bank and that type of thing.
	But then they started playing games in terms of, well, if you want the money right away, you can wait a week or whatever for it.
	But if you want it right away, it'd be $75.
	What? And then I had to accept a donation from someone and create a pen to do that.
	I'd never had to do that before.
	And then the last straw was Friday or Saturday.
	I got sent a $5 contribution and they said this failed.
	Contact us. So I contacted him, and I said, well, you've had too many transactions.
	I was like, what? I don't get that many transactions.
	I went back and looked at it. I'd had 10 transactions for the month of July.
	And typically, they're pretty small.
	You know, like that one, $5.
	And so I started looking.
	I haven't been able to find anything in terms, there's some limits in terms of how much money you can take out at a given time, depending on if you've given them, again, your social security number and all this other kind of stuff.
	I mean, they're just maniacs who are trying to do identity theft here.
	But if you do that, you can get money out and the limits are really high with that.
	Something like $7,000 is limits.
	I mean, that's basically not a limit.
	But I couldn't find anything that talked about a limit on the number of transactions.
	So I don't know what kind of game they're playing here.
	I mean, when I got canceled off of PayPal and Venmo, they didn't give me any explanation.
	And I said, I spent an hour or two on the phone with tech support.
	Finally, one guy said, I don't know what's going on.
	There's no reason given at all.
	It just says, terminate this account immediately.
	So, I don't know what's going on with Cash App.
	But we do have a lot of different places.
	If you'd like to support the program, we are supported primarily by just people who want to voluntarily contribute.
	We do have a new sponsor that I'm going to talk a little bit about.
	And it's kind of interesting.
	It's an organization called Patriot Bee.
	I'll just leave it at that and I'll tell you about them coming up.
	But I'm always happy to support bees.
	It's something that's real and natural.
	We need real, natural things in our life now.
	And so they do that and support that in a number of ways.
	So we're going to tell you about them coming up.
	On Rumble, Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip.
	So just on the history I've seen, the Republicans are the creation of the dystopian policies.
	Democrats are the enforcers.
	It's a WWE tag team event.
	Patriot Act, Model State, Health Care Act, etc.
	Yeah, they ran a lot of that stuff.
	It's... Depending on what you're looking at, and when we look at the authoritarian anti-civil liberty stuff, they do get that to go through certain things that they know that their base would oppose.
	They get the other party to do it, right?
	Because then that means that you're not going to have opposition from, you know, the Democrats like the authoritarian stuff.
	If the authoritarian stuff was done, the Democrat base would If the authoritarian stuff was done by the Democrats, Republicans would say, wait a minute, wait a minute, I've got my Constitution and my American flag right here, and I can't find that policy on either one of them.
	And so they would get really upset, and they would oppose it.
	But when it's done by a Republican, oh, well, that's not a problem.
	Not a problem at all. You want to ban gun items by executive order?
	Oh, that's okay. It's Trump.
	You want to take the guns and do the due process later?
	Oh, that's okay. It's Trump. So there's certain things like that.
	If that had been done by Hillary, if the lockdowns had been done by Hillary, the vaccines had been done by Hillary.
	Absolutely not. But you notice how, even with it being done by Trump, they're out there, well, I don't know if you want to get that Trump vaccine or what.
	And that lasted one millisecond after they announced Biden had won.
	Then they're all for it. And they want to force you to get it and the rest of the stuff.
	But their natural instinct was to love these types of things, and so they get a Republican in to do it.
	This is what concerns me about Trump.
	People understand where Biden is coming from, but when you put a Republican in, they don't understand it.
	And that's why I said in 2020, I said, Trump's going to do all of the stuff that Biden is going to do, but he's going to do it in a more subtle way.
	He'll do it behind the scenes with perverse incentives and things like that, whereas Biden will just come out and say, yeah, do it because I say so, that type of thing.
	And that's all they talk about.
	If they talk about anything that happened in 2020, they only talk about the, well, with a so-called pandemic.
	They only talk about the mandates.
	On Rumble, Sprumford says, I honestly believe if voting mattered these days, they wouldn't allow it.
	It's why voting and the term democracy is pushed so hard.
	The only vote that matters is money.
	Yeah. That's right.
	Money talks, and it also votes.
	And the politicians have the best return on investment you can get.
	That's what the richest man in the world knows, Elon Musk.
	On Rumble M Sellers, David, local elections are heating up for early voting August 1st here in East Tennessee.
	Horrible commercials been playing against Senator Nicely.
	Yeah, Karen got that on her phone.
	I didn't get it. But it was something like, yeah, he wants to give free education to illegal aliens and stuff like that.
	That's not true. What is true is that in Tennessee, it is, I think, you can go to community college for free.
	But I don't, you know, Senator Nicely didn't push anything like that through for illegal immigrants.
	It tells you something about his opponent, you know, misrepresenting his record.
	No, what Nicely is about, as I said, you know, he came up with the idea for the Prime Act and talked to Thomas Massey, and they pushed it.
	But unfortunately, you know, in Washington, we've only got Thomas Massey.
	In Tennessee, we've got a lot of people who are good, like Senator Nicely.
	Oh, Karen just brought this in. This is a flyer we got.
	It must be nice to be an illegal alien, says.
	This is a smear tactic.
	And again, it tells you something about the people who are behind this other candidate.
	Nicely has...
	I'm sure he's not perfect, but I've never seen a politician who's more closely aligned with my values and who actually comes up with effective strategies.
	And he can be very persuasive with the other people that are there.
	He's got a nice, easygoing demeanor, but he is very much about your own choice and that type of thing.
	I've seen the way he talks to people.
	So it is interesting, and he's very frank about things, and he does it in a very nicely way.
	He's appropriately named, I think.
	Biden is battling Nancy Pelosi pressure tactics.
	And gets Hillary Clinton's help.
	This was on Saturday before dropping out of the race on Sunday.
	And again, as I said before, Hillary Clinton getting behind him, I guess, so she can stab him in the back.
	President Biden battling a behind-the-scenes campaign led by Nancy Pelosi to abandon his re-election bid appears to be getting unexpected support from a former rival, Hillary Clinton.
	As his campaign's cash flow begins to dry up, Hillary Clinton and her husband, Bill Clinton, are asking donors to support Biden.
	Politico and CNN reported Saturday.
	You believe that? Or maybe they're contacting the donors and making some plans on their own.
	CNN and Politico reported on Saturday that the Clintons have been privately encouraging donors to continue backing Biden's campaign.
	According to CNN, one source said the Clintons are choosing to be, quote, deferential to Biden's decisions and then let other people apply the pressure.
	Just days before Biden's debate performance had changed the complexion of the campaign.
	Clinton joined Biden and Obama on stage at the Hollywood fundraiser, the one that you also saw George Clooney with.
	Paul Begala, a former Clinton advisor, said on Saturday on CNN, Well, there isn't an inch of daylight between President Clinton and President Biden.
	He's all in for Joe Biden.
	However... These political parties exist to win, he said.
	And it's not a family, it's not a religion, it's not a home.
	And if you want a friend in Washington, you better get a dog.
	He didn't say that, but other people have.
	When Democrats believe they won't help you win, they'll cut you loose, he said.
	And they'll slit your throat as well.
	It's not a family except in the mafia sense.
	Bill and Hillary Clinton stand by Biden.
	So we see this in many different places.
	As high-profile Democrats continue to call on Biden to drop out, he still has a strong backing of the Clintons, according to NBC. Well, that didn't last long, did it?
	Joe Scarborough is another bellwether because Scarborough...
	And Mika Brzezinski had always been in his corner.
	It was supposedly his favorite news show because they were so sycophantically attached to him.
	So much so that you had MSNBC took them off the air on the Monday following the Trump rally shooting, concerned about what they might say evidently.
	Got them very angry.
	But that was also part of it.
	You know, most of the media was pushing to get Biden out.
	But there were certain places like MSNBC doing that to Scarborough.
	And ABC threatening Stephanopoulos because he gave an off-the-cuff remark and somebody came up to him on the street and said, well, what do you think about Biden?
	And he had been the one who had done the interview.
	It was not a live interview.
	It was recorded so they could edit it.
	But he interviewed him, and he said, I don't think he can finish four years.
	And he got called on the carpet.
	You retract that, or we're going to take you off the air, is what everybody said happened.
	And again, this is Stephanopoulos, closely, you know, Director of Communications, White House, at...
	The Clinton administration went straight to ABC and has basically been their number one guy since.
	And so when you look at the people who were behind the news media, it seemed like they were not all on board in terms of pushing Biden out.
	Biden has, at least by our count, he said, Joe Biden has been an extremely successful president.
	And I will say, though, that when you're told by members of Congress that they're losing, that they're going to lose the House or the Senate if he stays on the ticket, when you're told by members of Congress who have seen the polls that you're going to lose swing states, that your numbers are going to go down in swing states, in states like Virginia, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Minnesota that are now in place at Scarborough.
	When your top fundraiser over the past five, six, seven, eight years is telling you the money is gone.
	The donors have all gone away.
	You know, it's really incumbent on people that are around Joe Biden to step up at this point and help the president and help the man that they love to do the right thing.
	And when Joe Scarborough says that, Well, you know, the fat lady has sung, and it's over, I guess.
	This is not going to end well if it continues to drag on, he warned.
	This is his best ally in the media, Joe Scarborough.
	Look at the events of yesterday, the events of the last three weeks.
	At some point, you know, I can tell you, Mike, the anger I hear is not at Joe Biden.
	The anger I hear are at the people that are keeping him in a bubble.
	It's not his fault.
	Poor Joe. I'm not angry at Joe.
	I'm angry at some of these faceless people behind the scenes that are keeping him in.
	And then Mika Brzezinski chimes in and says, or they have their own interests.
	Yeah, because, you know, it's so rare to find anybody in Washington, D.C. that is operating in their own interests.
	They're so altruistic and patriotic, aren't they?
	To a man, to a woman, they all are.
	It's just amazing when you see somebody in Washington...
	That is in it just for their own personal power and wealth.
	They stick out like a sore thumb, don't they?
	Just the other way around.
	David Letterman evidently was not in the loop.
	He was just coming out saying he was going to do a fundraiser for Biden at Martha's Vineyard.
	He's been out of Hollywood for quite some time.
	And his beard is halfway down his chest.
	But he was going to come out of retirement.
	And hold a fundraiser for him.
	Well, they may still do that for some purpose.
	I don't know. Give him a big send-off and a going-away party and a golden parachute.
	But as Babylon Bee points out, they pulled off a successful insurrection.
	The president has fallen, cried Democratic Party elites joyfully, having seized power.
	Democrat Party elites have worked tirelessly to overthrow the candidate chosen by voters.
	They worked tirelessly before all this stuff to make sure there wasn't anybody chosen by voters.
	You didn't have an election anyway.
	They kicked people off the ballot.
	They literally kicked RFK Jr.
	off and these other people that were there.
	Shutdown debates, you name it.
	It took everything we have, but we have deposed the democratically elected candidate of our party, said former President Obama proudly.
	Democracy has been saved.
	And at press time, MSNBC's Joe Scarborough had come on TV to explain how some insurrections are actually a good thing.
	Biden then drops out, and when he drops out, he doesn't say anything in terms of a reason, because he'll do that later.
	But it truly is unprecedented.
	As I point out, we've had other people who have, you know, go back to Lyndon Johnson and all the unrest about the Vietnam War and the riots in Chicago and that type of thing.
	But... He left the...
	He said, I'm not going to run again.
	But that was in March.
	That was eight months before the election.
	So we never had any sitting president who has dropped out of the re-election running this late, this close to the convention.
	So that part of it is unprecedented, but not unplanned.
	It was precisely what they planned to do.
	By the dates that they picked for the convention for the public humiliation of Biden in the debate.
	The DNC chair, Jamie Harrison, said in the coming days, listen to how cynical this is, the party will undertake a transparent and orderly process.
	This process will be governed by established rules.
	No, they're making all this stuff up as they go along.
	It truly is, again, the early debate was a plan, but what I'm saying is, you know, and they've got a plan for how they're going to run this stuff through.
	It's just that from the perspective of people who are not in the smoke-filled room making these Machiavellian plans, you know, it looks like they're reacting to stuff, but they are making this stuff up as they go along.
	And then you have Mike Johnson, who has responded to this and says, well, I think they've got some legal hurdles in some of these states.
	This is going to be challenged.
	It'll be litigated, he says.
	Well, that's absolute nonsense.
	They don't have a leg to stand on.
	And this is...
	You also see...
	Thomas Massey had made the statement.
	He said, well, think about this.
	The Democrats and Joe Biden are saying that he's not up to campaigning for this, but he can still be the president.
	And so that has been picked up and repeated by Mike Johnson.
	It's been picked up and repeated by J.D. Vance.
	If you can't run, you can't serve.
	Well, we're going to, this is always the plan.
	When we come back, we're going to take a look at who JD serves.
	And we're going to take a look at the plan for replacement as well when we come back.
	Stay with us. We'll be right back.
	So, let's go.
	It's common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back.
	Yeah, I'm Rumble Sprumford.
	He says, God bless you, Dave.
	Well, thank you. I appreciate that.
	And on Rockfin, Dougalug, thank you.
	I appreciate that tip as well.
	And on Rockfin, IRS Machine Gun, thank you for the tip.
	Sorry I didn't get into Gatlinburg.
	By the way, that reminds me that on Saturday, rather than doing that, because of what happened with CrowdStrike, Goatree contacted me.
	This is really kind of interesting, and it's affected a lot of things.
	And CrowdStrike has affected a lot of things.
	And they have some interesting ties, not just to Hillary Clinton, but the World Economic Forum and so forth.
	And so we got Goatree on and recorded an interview on Saturday, and we got it out to a lot of different places on Saturday.
	But we're going to play that.
	In the third hour, the interview with Goatree, we talk about what happened with this crowd strike problem with the computers going down around the world.
	But IRS Machine Gun says, can you imagine the retirement party that Hunter is going to throw for his daddy?
	There'll be at least 10 more felonies committed.
	Yeah, that absolutely is true.
	I don't think I would want to be at that party at all.
	Before we go any further with Biden, let's talk a little bit about what was going on with Biden.
	Well, actually, let's do that.
	Let's wait on that, and let's do talk about what happens next in terms of the process before we get into what happened at the RNC last week.
	Replacing Biden on the ticket would be unlawful in some states.
	As I said before, that's what Johnson is saying.
	But first of all, who cares about laws?
	The Democrats care.
	Do the Republicans care about laws?
	No. And they certainly don't care about election laws.
	And I've seen this firsthand.
	Nobody cares about this.
	They'll simply move the debates.
	They'll simply make exceptions.
	As I've said, I've seen many times where there was only a Democrat running, running unopposed by the Republicans, and the Libertarians would comply with the more stringent rules that don't apply to Republicans and don't apply to Democrats.
	And they would jump through all the hoops and they would get on the ballot.
	And then the Republicans would come in after the date had passed.
	And said, you know, we're not on the ballot.
	You don't really want to have an election without one of the two major parties being on there.
	And the judges always would just wave the rules.
	Yeah, that's right. We'll forget about the date.
	Go ahead. Come on in. You think they're not going to do that for the presidential election?
	You know, these were local elections and other things like that that they did that.
	So Johnson said on Sunday that this could lead to legal challenges.
	He said it would not be possible for some states to switch out Biden for another candidate ahead of the presidential election in November.
	He said, so it would be wrong and I think unlawful in accordance with some of these states' rules for a handful of people to go in a back room and switch it out because they don't like the candidate any longer, he said.
	That's not how this is supposed to work.
	So I think they would run into some legal impediments in at least a few of these jurisdictions.
	Well, again, the law never gets in the way of them doing what they want to do, especially when it applies to them.
	And so MSNBC sets the record straight.
	And Mike Johnson is completely wrong about this.
	Richard Winger is their source at MSNBC. And he was somebody that, again, I knew quite a bit.
	We had quite a bit of interaction with Richard Winger.
	Ballot Access News is his website, and he has focused on that.
	So he was the go-to guy for everybody that was trying to get on the ballot as a third party or as an independent candidate.
	The Republicans and Democrats have it given to them.
	Everybody else has to fight like crazy.
	And so MSNBC... So as to their Democrat readers, stop panicking.
	Replacing Biden on the ballots is not a problem.
	But they do say this, America's ballot access laws and procedures for how candidates are placed on the ballot in each state are notoriously difficult compared to other democracies' laws.
	And again, we don't have a democracy.
	We have a republic, but theoretically.
	But in actuality, what we do have is a democracy.
	We've got mob rule.
	They've moved most of the rule of law away and a lot of the representative republic stuff out of the way.
	And they want to get rid of all of it.
	Electoral College, you name it, all of it.
	But it is notoriously difficult.
	It is designed that way to keep everybody else off.
	Richard Winger says, who is the nation's foremost authority on the topic, Says that there has long been arbitrary and difficult petition thresholds, discriminatory treatment of third-party and independent candidates.
	This is why I said, you know, you want to know...
	When the election is rigged, it begins with who even gets on the ballot, who gets in the debates, and that kind of thing.
	And you can see that again with RFK Jr., with the other candidates who were running against Biden in the Democrat Party, kicked out.
	Major party candidates also run afoul of the rules on occasions, and just this year, Trump's ballot access was imperiled under the 14th Amendment's bar on insurrectionists before the Supreme Court ruled in his favor.
	He's not been convicted of insurrection, by the way.
	So, again, that doesn't even apply.
	So they said, as it currently stands, state Democrat parties...
	Wouldn't be replacing Biden at all because he's not yet the party's official nominee.
	That's what I referred to earlier when I said they wanted to do a virtual nomination.
	They wanted to do a virtual nomination to make sure they didn't run afoul of Ohio.
	They didn't trust the Republican governor saying, that's all right, we'll keep you on the ballot.
	So they said, let's do a virtual nomination before our late convention date.
	And then there became more of an impetus to do it as there was a move to replace Biden on the ballot.
	And that was shut down.
	Winger says he calls much of the coverage about this threat gullible.
	He said there would be no legal problem in any state to change out the candidate on the ballot.
	The bottom line is that there's unlikely to be an election law impediment to replacing Biden.
	He said in every state. This is how it works Both major parties are qualified for what is known as automatic ballot access. This is Republicans Democrats automatically get on Everybody else has to go through this Task worthy of Sisyphus rolling the rock up the hill every year and then having it roll back down on them and then having to Do it again It's virtually an impossible task a Libertarian Party got very good at it, but that's all they
	accomplished That's why I said you have to be careful That you don't get distracted off onto a side issue They focused so much on ballot access, they didn't ever get anybody elected at local level.
	And so they never really got anything done.
	There's always just this top-down approach.
	That's why I've seen that done, I've worked in that, and I know how hopeless that top-down approach is.
	It's got to be bottom-up or it's not real.
	Their nominees, Republicans and Democrats, do not need to gather petition signatures.
	They don't have to clear any other hurdles to secure a spot on the general election ballot.
	Instead, the Democrats and Republicans simply tell the state's election authorities who their candidates are.
	This process is never completed prior to the formal nomination by the party's national convention.
	By the same token, when we were in North Carolina, when we worked to get the Libertarian Party on the ballot, All the candidates were selected in convention.
	They were selected. The national candidates were selected in national convention.
	The president should say.
	And then the state convention...
	Would determine who was going to be running for Congress or any state office, and they would just send this over to the state.
	The problem was getting the party on the ballot.
	Once the party is on the ballot, it operated just like the Democrats and Republicans.
	It's like, here's our list of candidates for these offices, and that's it.
	It works that way in every state.
	So for people to think that there's some kind of an obligation based on these primaries, In a sense, that's a suggestion from the voters that they don't have to follow, like everything else is a suggestion from the voters that they don't have to follow.
	The one complication, again, arises in Ohio, but again, that's not going to be an issue.
	They will get that changed.
	Even with this wrinkle in Ohio, there is no potential problem.
	All the state laws that Heritage has had some commenters out there saying, well, you can't do it.
	You know, Heritage Foundation is absolutely wrong about this stuff.
	They said... That only concerns the process for a party to replace one of its candidates later in the calendar after having previously certified a candidate or the Biden-Harris ticket, you see.
	That's the big issue.
	Once you, to put them on, to put out the slate of candidates, you just do it in convention.
	But if you want to change somebody after you send it in, now it becomes a big deal.
	That's why they were so careful about the timing of the public humiliation of Biden that we call a debate.
	And when the convention was going to happen.
	It's very calculated. And when you look at these politics, and when people don't understand how the political parties work, it's one of the reasons why there was a lot of confusion revolving around the electors and the electoral college and the 2020 election.
	You had a lot of these people who just showed up, and I had friends who were really confused about it.
	They got Republican electors, they showed up.
	It's like, They're just there from that particular party.
	Just like you get a slate of people that are going to run for office, you also turn in a slate of your electors.
	Let's say that the state has 10 electoral college votes based on its population.
	You would send them a list of 10 names of people who were in your party.
	And then if your candidate is certified by the state, As the winner, then those 10 people, not the 10 people from the other parties, but those 10 people are now the electoral college representatives for that state.
	Those are the rules under which they operate, regardless of whether they align with the Constitution, and they don't really.
	But that's the way it operates.
	That's why they call them fake electors and things like that.
	Now, within the party, you can have a situation where, in 1980, you had Roger McBride, who was, I think, the adopted son of Laura Wilder, who wrote Little House on the Prairie or something.
	And he was a producer of the show Little House on the Prairie.
	So he had money. He was in Hollywood.
	And he was a Republican elector.
	And he cast his vote for the Libertarian Party rather than for Ronald Reagan in 1980.
	And that was the end of his affiliation with the Republican Party.
	But that's called an unfaithful elector because they expect these electors.
	You get people who have been active in the party.
	You expect them to support the party's nominee.
	But, of course, they can do whatever they want.
	But they control that process.
	And what I said, and it was the final straw, I guess, that got me fired.
	On that December the 14th, all the electors had sent in their votes from each of the different states, and it was done.
	Because there was never another slate of electors selected.
	And I said, if they wanted to send another slate of electors, and of course, Pence said it, J.D. Vance has now said it, Thomas Massey said it at the same time, he said they didn't give us anything to work with.
	If they would have gone to some of these, there were four states that That were key.
	They all had Republican legislators.
	They all had a razor-thin margin of victory for Biden.
	And if they would have made the case to those Republican state houses that Trump had won, and if they had believed that, they could have said, well, we're going to say that the Republican electors are going to be used.
	Now, that would have been challenged in court, but they would have had a pretty good case.
	You know, is it the executive branch of the state that gets to pick who the electors are?
	Because that's what happens with the Board of Elections.
	It's under the governor.
	Or is it the legislature?
	And so then you could have had something to work with, but nobody did that.
	They only challenged it a little bit in the courts.
	So how do they replace Biden?
	Well, the newly unbound delegates, and there's 3,904 of them, will pick the new nominee, they say.
	These delegates, along with the 37 uncommitted delegates and the eight that were won by candidates who dropped out already, can vote for whoever they want to.
	Just like what I was saying in terms of the electors.
	Nobody is really truly bound by any of this stuff.
	It's just kind of your word, your honor.
	And we know that there's no honor among thieves or politicians in Washington.
	The virtual roll call again is not going to happen.
	They had planned it for next week.
	Then, who are the delegates?
	Well, the superdelegates, we heard a lot about them in 2016, and it's kind of interesting to see how Semaphore describes this, a Democrat publication.
	Superdelegates got toxic in 2016 when Bernie Sanders made an issue out of them in his primary campaign.
	It was an issue because he was losing in states that he won the popular vote.
	Because the superdelegates would do whatever they wanted to.
	The other delegates were allocated based on how people had voted.
	They allocated them to candidates.
	And again, you know, these are, you have people, so you have the electors that go to the electoral college, and they're supposed to be loyal to the party.
	Then within the primary, before you're coming up to the convention, you have delegates that are allocated to a particular candidate, and they're supposed to be loyal to that candidate up to the convention.
	That's why, always in the past, people, if there was a real competition, they would try to get the endorsement of one of these candidates and have him tell his delegates, or at least his delegates, to another candidate.
	But The superdelegates were doing their own thing.
	They were above all this stuff.
	Super, right? Above it.
	And so, Bernie Sanders had several states where he beat Hillary Clinton, but she got more delegates because she schmoozed the party operatives that are known as superdelegates.
	So, they will not be voting on the first ballot because...
	It's smacks of insider corruption.
	So how do they get around this?
	Well, it's a pretty easy workaround if they want.
	They can have enough candidates on the ballot that nobody wins on the first round.
	Then the superdelegates come in and make the pick.
	Pretty easy, right?
	Even I can see that.
	If the delegates rejected Lala Harris...
	The Biden-Harris war chest could be donated to the DNC or to a super PAC. Ah, follow the money.
	$91 million in that war chest.
	And if Harris stays on, if Harris is the candidate, that's at her disposal.
	This is another reason, besides the fact that she's a cackling dodo bird.
	The fact she's got $91 million in the war chest is another reason why they want to push her out of the way because then that goes into the DNC and these people have control of it.
	But as long as her name, since her name was part of this ticket...
	As long as she is on the ticket, if Biden is out, then it all goes to her.
	So she is the focus of a lot of these people's ire.
	And on Friday, there was a conference call.
	And they had Harris doing it.
	They said it was very sloppy, very unorganized.
	There was a scolding tone.
	They were unimpressed and they were insulted, said the donors.
	Well, it sounds like it's her typical thing.
	It was a total failure, damaging and poor planning.
	One person called it ludicrous.
	Another said it was mismanaged.
	It was rushed. It was a Friday call with 300 heavy-hitter donors.
	Kicked off reports from field organizers who used their time to vent anger over the intra-party battle over whether Biden should remain.
	Organizers stalled to buy time while everybody waited for Harris to join the call 20 minutes after it started.
	Donors were warned against agitating to replace Biden.
	And then she came in.
	And as they characterize it, they said they had the bad cop, good cop treatment.
	So before she comes on, they wait 20 minutes.
	And for those 20 minutes, they've got some staff there.
	And they're talking to these big-hitting donors and warning them, saying it's time to stop the leaks and the rampant rumors.
	These are donors who are not used to getting admonished and told what to do, said one of the sources to NBC. Many of the donors went into the call expecting to receive insider insights.
	Instead, they got a lecture. And then she came out to give them the good cop treatment.
	So they're first scolded for their lack of faith in Biden.
	Then they got a pep talk from Lala Harris.
	And of course, it's not just the mega donors who are doing that.
	There's some bad blood within the party about that.
	Here's Occasional Cortex, Alexandria Occasional Cortex, talking about how she doesn't like Lala.
	She says nobody likes her.
	And I'm going to say what a lot of these folks aren't saying.
	I'm just going to say it.
	If you think that there is consensus among the people who want Joe Biden to leave, that they will support Kamala, Vice President Harris, you would be mistaken.
	And I'm going to say that because if they're going to come out and say all their little things on background off the record, but they're not going to be fully honest, I'm going to be honest for them.
	I'm in these rooms. I see what they say in conversations.
	A lot of them are not just interested in removing the president.
	They are interested in removing the whole ticket.
	Yeah, yeah. Well, there she is.
	Occasional cortex.
	On Rumble, DGA says that David Trump should be the Democrat nominee also because the new Republican Party platform is no different from Hillary's in 2016.
	And the donors and the people that they're supporting are no different.
	That's the key thing as well. We're going to get into that.
	As one person said last week, you're telling me that I'm a rhino?
	She said, I'm given a choice of three Democrats.
	Biden, Trump, or RFK Jr.
	And I'm supposed to pick from one of them where I'm a rhino?
	Yeah. A 28-day path forward for the Democrat Party, says The Hill.
	And again, this is an op-ed piece by Zogby, a former governor.
	Also, David Walters wrote this.
	He was on the DNC committee.
	He was part of the rules thing.
	This was published Sunday, just immediately before Biden dropped out.
	And now they've got a 28-day path.
	And now it's very easy.
	Again, we're talking about the way people are manipulated.
	This is the important thing. This is, at this point, we can see that, you know, who's running the country?
	Who's running the world? Well, Biden pretends to.
	And that's why one of the people said, we've got to get him out of there.
	People are going to see how, you know, the Republican Party and the Democrat Party, they're just putting puppets up there.
	These guys are not actually running everything.
	Everybody wants to believe that there is some kind of, we've got a benevolent dictator that agrees with them, that's going to fix everything for them.
	They've got all of their hope and their expectation in that dictator.
	And they think that these guys really have a lot of power.
	They represent an agenda.
	And it's important to follow them, so as you know, the line of attack that's going to be coming at us from one side or the other.
	But at this level, this Game of Thrones is really like a high school election, because it's the people behind it that are really going to be affecting the policy.
	The suggested plan, 28 days forward, can only begin if the President announces that he'll not be seeking re-election.
	He can announce that he is asking the DNC to define the way forward.
	And, again, you know, we've had all of the press attention from the shooting at the rally through last week at the RNC. It's all been focused on the Republicans.
	Now we're going to see, as soon as all that was over, as soon as the party was over, they start with this, now we're going to switch everything.
	And, you know, they had already planned it.
	They'd already timed it out. All of it was planned.
	Now, this is being put out...
	I think it's the more serious plan because it's being put out as an op-ed piece on the Hill, the very establishment political paper.
	It's being put out by people who are currently on the DNC. It's different from the plan that was put out by James Carville.
	James Carville said, well, let's just let Clinton and Obama pick some people.
	Yeah, they're the best ones to pick anything.
	That's not going to fly.
	They've got to make this look like it is a quote-unquote democratic process.
	And so what they're going to say is that they will have, they're going to have, out of the 450 people on the DNC, each of these candidates has to have 40 endorsements.
	The 40 must include at least seven members from each of the parties for geographic regions.
	Now, what they don't say is whether or not a DNC member can endorse more than one person.
	Such a process will most likely result in no more than five potential nominees.
	That's why I think they can only endorse in their idea and their plan.
	Only one. These nominating petitions will then be submitted to the Secretary of the DNC for certification no later than 10 days after the process is announced and should include a signed statement pledging to run a positive campaign coupled with an agreement to endorse the winning nominee.
	The Democrat National Committee, the DNC, will host two televised town halls over a 10-day period for the certified candidates to appear together to make their case to the Democrat convention delegates into the nation.
	You see, they're setting up this reality TV show, this beauty contest.
	And they have thought through all this stuff.
	It's a plan. And they're just now telling you what the plan is.
	I mean, they didn't sit down at the kitchen table on Friday night and come up with this thing.
	And they've been working on this for a while.
	They're just rolling it out in their op-ed piece.
	The messaging from these new, younger leaders who will oppose Donald Trump, praising Biden's progress and explaining why they are best positioned to continue his progress, will be powerful and will no doubt command large TV audiences.
	Just like, you know, Hulk Hogan and the other people that they had there was Amber Rose or something, you know, that's Bring in the celebrities to get a TV audience.
	Well, this is gonna be a dramatic thing.
	As I said, when I was a kid, there used to be a lot of drama at the conventions.
	They didn't have everything tied up.
	And there's going to be alliances that were made and delegates that were traded off from different candidates.
	Well, you know, I'm coming in here and I've got a block of candidates and they're trying to trade it for a cabinet position coming up and that type of thing.
	And there was always a lot of suspense.
	That's what they're going back to.
	The candidates will be formally nominated.
	The votes will be cast by the 3,900 elected delegates in the first round.
	And then in subsequent rounds, they will bring in another 1,500 superdelegates.
	They call them automatic delegates because they don't like the term superdelegate.
	Same thing, just a different label.
	So Biden will have made all this possible if this occurs, they said.
	And they put this out just hours before as an encouragement to Biden.
	Biden will have made all of this possible.
	He will be seen as a true national leader who put aside his personal ambition and allowed the Democrats to preserve and build on his legacy.
	Otherwise, what we're going to do is make sure he doesn't even get a presidential library and all the rest of this stuff.
	And then as people start lining up behind candidates, you have a guy, Pablo Ohana.
	I'd never heard of this guy.
	He's from the UK. It pushed to keep them in the EU, the Remain people.
	He was leading the campaign in Ireland to put abortion in that country that had never had it before.
	And this is the guy who thinks that Americans need to pick Hillary Clinton.
	I don't think that, I don't know, I could just be projecting my values and my utter revulsion of Hillary Clinton and Democrats in general.
	But I just, I can't, I can't see this working out.
	He said, the notion that there's no suitable successor exists, but that's not a good one.
	But just one of the most qualified people ever to run for office, and that is Hillary Clinton.
	Clinton is younger than both Biden and Trump.
	Faint praise, isn't it?
	And she's just a shade younger than they are.
	Her continued advocacy for children's rights and all the rest of the stuff.
	This is the... The UN Convention for the Rights of the Child and this whole idea that it takes a village to raise a child, but parents, we want to get rid of them, cut them off.
	She pushes this kind of UN patricide.
	That's a hallmark of everything that she's done.
	She really wants to destroy the family.
	And then there's Michelle Obama.
	And, again, a documentary that Love of the Road sent me, done by Gilbert and, you know, Shell Obama 2024.
	You know, different people have different candidates out there.
	I think they're all despicable, but we're seeing these kinds of op-ed pieces pushing all of them on the side.
	It may be one of these...
	Lower profile governors who run this time around, because I think they really do want the establishment and the technocracy.
	I think they really want to have Trump in.
	I'll tell you why when we come back.
	Instead of running against a man who appears to be too old to keep his thoughts together, Trump will have to face off against a younger, more vital opponent, Michelle Obama.
	Trump and his party brought this on themselves, said this person at the Miami Herald.
	Well, I think it was, you could say they brought it on themselves if they let the DNC pick the debate dates.
	Other than that, the debate last month pretty conclusively showed Biden isn't up to what Americans expect.
	And, of course, that was by design.
	So they only have one sure thing, he says, Michelle Obama.
	Polls show that other possible contenders, including Lala Harris, run slightly behind Trump.
	They'd start out playing catch-up.
	But in those same polls, Michelle Obama crushes Trump by 11 points.
	This is the whole purpose of all this stuff, to bring somebody in.
	Where there is no time really to vet them or to define them.
	I think she'd find it pretty hard to turn down if delegates at the DNC were to draft her.
	And just to remind you of where Obama is, LifeSite News talked about Obama's vision of democracy that threatens our constitutional republic.
	And there's two aspects to this in their article.
	One of them... There's the idea, they keep selling everybody, that America is a democracy and not a republic.
	As a matter of fact, even James Carville said, what's the matter with those people out there that think it's a republic?
	Oh, they know him. It's like, well, maybe they've read the Constitution.
	On the 4th of July this year, Obama started putting himself back in the spotlight, which I find to be interesting.
	He's been pretty quiet since he left.
	But then he comes out to write an op-ed piece.
	He says the key difference between a democracy and a republic lies in the limits placed on government by the law.
	And so that truly is the case.
	You see, he doesn't like that.
	When we look at what happened with Warp Speed, We wound up with a government that didn't put itself, subject itself to the law.
	They just did whatever they wanted to, whatever they could get away with.
	And so it is mob rule.
	Obama has said, and I've talked about this many times, the idea that the Constitution, he knows, is a charter of negative liberties.
	That's his label, because he doesn't like what the Constitution does.
	They're not negative liberties.
	They're individual liberties.
	And there's nothing negative about prohibiting the government from stomping on your face.
	That's a positive thing.
	But he calls it negative because he's looking at this from the standpoint that he wants unfettered government.
	If they want to stomp on your face, so be it.
	So he wants unfettered government, so he thinks anything that stops that as negative is bad.
	He said the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties that says what the states can't do to you, says what the federal government can't do to you, but it doesn't say what the state or federal government must do on your behalf.
	That is socialism, communism.
	He calls that positive.
	So I need to have something in the Constitution that says I have a right to being fed, housed, clothed, educated, this or that, right?
	Every one of these things, every component of the welfare state, he wants mandated in the Constitution.
	The problem for him is that the Constitution prohibits those things.
	But he and the Republicans have made sure that they don't follow the Constitution, even though it is the basis of their authority to govern.
	And that goes back to an interview, a radio interview, they had in 2001.
	And as part of that, where he was defining and labeling our God-given liberties, that we prohibit government from approaching those God-given liberties.
	The Bill of Rights doesn't give us those liberties. What it does is it prohibits the government from stomping on the things that we have that every human being has. So he called that negative.
	And in that, he said that the Constitution is flawed.
	That was his term. And that America must, in his words, break free of the Constitution.
	In other words, we don't want to have a fixed document, a written law.
	It needs to be something that is malleable.
	They call that a living Constitution.
	And that's how they usher in the Marxism.
	So, on Rumble, Owen 61 says, Trump, Harris, 24.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to take a look at how we could do Trump and Hillary on the same ticket.
	They would be quite comfortable with each other.
	So we'll be right back
	So
	you you
	the
	defending the American dream You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Let's take a look at the people who rule us here.
	This is a great clip from AI. They've got the number.
	Here's she wearing his Winnie the Pooh pajamas and Trudeau in his dress.
	Seems like you're a boy.
	Oh, there's Clinton, Bill Clinton in the blue dress and red shoes.
	I'll describe this to the people who are listening in audio here.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, that's something that was put together on AI. I didn't do it.
	Somebody on Twitter did.
	And take a look at these.
	It's really pretty funny what they did with it.
	They put Putin in because he's opposed to LGBT. They put him in a dress, a rainbow-colored dress that is there.
	And then the next one here is Biden, which I thought was particularly done well.
	They got him there with his aviator shades.
	And he's got camo.
	But he's a wartime president, but he's sitting in a wheelchair.
	And then they have Trump, who is in an orange suit, like a prison suit, and on his chest it's got VL, which is Roman numerals for 45.
	And I think it's also interesting because even though he's got chains, he's holding the chains, at least one of his hands there.
	So it's kind of like he's broken free of that.
	Then we have Nancy Pelosi, famous for being an insider stock trader.
	She's got an outfit there that...
	As I've said many times, these politicians need to be required to wear their sponsors as if they were NASCAR drivers.
	And so they're all over her dress, all these different corporations that give her money.
	And then a big emblazoned on her chest there says, New York Stock Exchange and NVIDIA symbols for them with dollar signs.
	Then you have President Xi saying, In his Winnie the Pooh pajamas and carrying a Winnie the Pooh handbag there.
	Because that was something that really got under his skin when they had a picture of him walking next to Obama, who is tall and thin, much taller and thinner than she is.
	And people put up a cartoon showing Tigger next to President Xi in the same orientation.
	He banned, the Communist Party banned Winnie the Pooh everywhere.
	It's all about egos. It's all about egos and the party.
	Then we have Trudeau in a dress that is the Canadian maple leaf all over it. And of course, again referring to his gender fluidity, I guess we could say. Then Hillary Clinton. And she's got a pantsuit that says Supreme all over it.
	I guess I'm not really sure what that reference is.
	Maybe some of you understand that.
	But one of the best ones of these, then, is Bill Clinton walking down the runway in that blue dress.
	From that painting in the blue dress and the red shoes.
	Remember that painting that was in Jeffrey Epstein's New York Manor?
	Or we should say lair. Maybe that's a better way to describe that thing.
	A lair. And so they've got him walking down the aisle in that blue dress and the red shoes.
	Then we have Lala, hyper-sexualized here because we know that's how she got her position, so to speak.
	And then we have the technocrats.
	They put Zuckerberg in as he's in there.
	He's transforming into a lizard.
	We have Tim Cook, again, in a dress with a purse, but then around his neck is hung a Mac laptop.
	And finally, we have, closing it out, we have Bill Gates, who walks down the runway, and then as he gets to the end of the runway...
	The thing that he's carrying turns into the blue screen of death, which goes back to what we're going to be talking about with Goat Tree coming up in the next hour.
	I've got a couple of comments here.
	Jason Barker on Rockfan, thank you for the tip.
	He said, David, you should promote the merchandise.
	I haven't seen you do that in a while.
	You're absolutely right. I'm really bad at sales.
	Really, really bad. I will do that in a moment here.
	I am going to promote the B people, Patriot B best here in a moment.
	And on Rumble, Mad Mim, thank you for the tip.
	God bless. How soon will you be having Dr.
	Shiva back on? Which platform?
	Well, I answered that two different questions.
	Yeah, we'll have him back on pretty soon.
	I think his message is good because what he does is he focuses on people who are focusing on the presidency.
	And that's what I've been doing for this first half of this show.
	If you're focused on the presidency and you're watching this news and you're kind of curious about what it is and you're drawn into this...
	This high school type election.
	You need to understand that there's things that you can do at the personal level.
	And that's really the message of Dr.
	Shiva, if I could condense it down.
	It's like, get out of this control system.
	Understand how they are controlling you.
	And understand that there are concrete things that you can do.
	That is, I think, the real reason to cover the presidential politics.
	It should be covered for that.
	And it should be covered to get people out of that box that they put themselves in.
	And he's doing that with the presidential campaign, so we will have him back on.
	Which platform gives you the biggest portion of tips and money from?
	I would say that is Subscribestar, but we've had a lot of people who have moved over to Zelle, because Zelle has no fees.
	And right now, that's just a clear, straight shot through.
	There's no fees, no taxes for anybody on that.
	But Subscribestar is a reliable one because if somebody sets that up, if their card expires, Subscribestar doesn't tell them.
	I've had that happen over and over again.
	People have told me. So that's a bit of a problem.
	But other than that, you know, somebody just determines how much they want to do on a regular basis.
	And so that is helpful.
	You have to... Don't have to make a special effort each month.
	But we are getting a lot of people on Zelle.
	And of course, as I said, we're having problems with Cash App.
	I've had too many people.
	Here we are, the third week of the month, and we've had 10 people, 10 donations, and that's too many, they said.
	Maybe that's a new rule or something that's never applied in the past.
	But... We'll see what happens going forward.
	Travis said, don't just tell people where they can't contribute.
	Tell them where they can't contribute. So if you want to know where you can contribute, go to thedavidknightshow.com.
	It tells you where you can watch the show.
	And then it also tells you Where you can support us as well.
	And I would have to say that, you know, besides Subscribestar, for the podcasts, we have a lot of people who listen on audio basis.
	And for people who support us on Subscribestar, we give them a link to the show that doesn't have any commercials in it.
	But the commercials, I have to say, is...
	The same, maybe even a little bit more than Subscribestar, the commercials on the audio podcast stuff.
	Also on Subscribestar, you get a list of links to all the articles we covered during the week.
	Yeah, that's right. That's another thing we do on Subscribestar.
	We just started doing that recently.
	Yes. Thank you, Travis, for doing that.
	Travis took the initiative to do that.
	We had somebody who asked about that, and he took the initiative to do that.
	So we put that out, and we put the description of links, and we put a link to an audio podcast that does not have commercials.
	Of course, the videos don't have commercials on them, and we just trust people to contribute if they want to keep the show on the air.
	But again, you can find all the links to these places as well as where you can support us and subscribe star on Zell.
	And we've got a mailing address that you can actually send things to.
	So that works really well as well.
	And you can find all that at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Well, as we saw the runway there, you know, it really is a celebrity show.
	And we saw this when we looked at the RNC. We had Hulk Hogan out there ripping his shirt off.
	And you've probably seen this at this point in time.
	But it was just such an astonishing thing.
	I had to play it. I mean, this is really what politics has become.
	It really has become professional wrestling.
	It happened last week when they took a shot at my hero...
	And they tried to kill the next president of the United States.
	Enough was enough!
	You want to fight?
	You got one, right?
	I heard somebody else say that. Trump-a-mania rule again!
	Let Trump-a-mania make America great again!
	It's professional wrestling, isn't it?
	Absolutely is.
	Even at the shooting.
	Fight, fight, fight. That type of thing.
	The greatest tag team of my life, he said, Trump and Vance.
	I think the greatest tag team of my life has been to see the tag team of Trump and Biden.
	And just like wrestling, they have fake heroes and fake heels.
	He's going to straighten the country out for real Americans.
	Yeah, that's right. Just trust him.
	He's not going to rip you off, says the man who ripped off his shirt.
	And we're all glad that it wasn't RIP for Trump.
	But he said, we've never had it.
	This is what he said before that or after that.
	We never had it better than the Trump years.
	Really? Yeah, I loved that lockdown, the masks, the six-foot distances, all of these superstitions that they pushed out on us.
	By the way, we now have Dr.
	Michael Yadin. Talk about superstitions.
	I've been saying, and I've picked this up from a lot of doctors, and now Michael Yadin, who was the vice president at Pfizer, Creating this stuff.
	He's now come out and said there wasn't a COVID pandemic.
	And he says, and I don't think viruses exist.
	I think that's a model that doesn't reflect the reality that's going out there.
	I've seen that from a lot of people and I've mentioned it many times.
	You know, we got models of the universe, you know, intellectual abstractions to try to help them understand and predict, but things that they can't really observe or test directly.
	And so when we're talking about things that are far away or things that are microscopic, submicroscopic, they can't really observe these things.
	And so they come up with abstractions about how nuclear physics works.
	And now, with quantum physics, everything changed.
	Newton had some models that worked very well, and he created calculus, and he had calculus equations for the physical world that we could observe and measure.
	That worked really well when they started going to the atomic level, subatomic level.
	We had a model that was put out by Niels Bohr.
	Now they've moved on from that and from what Einstein has talked about.
	They've moved on to quantum physics, and quantum physics operates very differently.
	And so we have these abstractions out there.
	And quite frankly, I think the virus abstraction, I agree with Michael Yadin.
	I think it is... Overblown.
	I don't think it is accurate.
	But we'll talk more about that later.
	Getting back to the politics stuff.
	We never had it better than the Trump years.
	Just cherish the memory of lockdowns and six-foot social distancing and masks.
	Wasn't that a wonderful time?
	When you were non-essential?
	When the Constitution was non-essential?
	Could all be suspended and they want to bring that all back?
	He said we had a thriving economy.
	Well, that was B.C., Before COVID? Or maybe we say BS. Before speed.
	Before warp speed, right? Yeah, we had a thriving economy.
	I mean, we had this debt bubble.
	They were just pouring money in with the repo market in 2019.
	The quantitative easing and putting money into that and everything.
	It was just pump, pump, pump, pump, pump.
	Boy, you know, it was really great when we were all doing those drugs on Friday night.
	It's on Saturday when the hangover comes in that it was a problem, right?
	Anyway, he said, we had strong borders.
	Did we? Did we?
	I remember caravans coming in, and I don't know if we had strong borders.
	What happened? As soon as Trump left, everybody starts coming in.
	And it really wasn't anything that Trump did.
	It was his COVID rules that he started to put in place.
	I mean, who wants to come into a country this crazy anyway with the COVID rules?
	We had safe streets, you know, like that summer, the summer of 2020, where BLM was rioting everywhere.
	We had safe streets, said Hulk Hogan.
	But then we lost it all in the blink of an eye.
	Just in the blink of a lie is really what we're talking about here.
	So he rips his shirt off.
	It's a performance.
	But people love that.
	That's the same kind of shtick that Alex does.
	Screaming and yelling and ripping stuff up and temper tantrums on air.
	It's professional wrestling.
	It gets people to watch that.
	On Brownstone, a historical view of today's political theater.
	Pointing out that public debates, quote unquote, between candidates were not a very common thing.
	I mean, they had the Lincoln-Douglas debate.
	That was a pretty rare thing.
	It wasn't in modern times that we had the televised debate between Richard Nixon and JFK. Interestingly enough, the people who listened to that debate on radio believed that Nixon had won.
	The people who watched it on TV believed I believe that JFK won because he was younger, more photogenic.
	Nixon had a 5 o'clock shadow or whatever.
	They didn't like that at the time.
	So it was based on physical appearance.
	And then after that, there wasn't another one until 1976, the presidential election between Jimmy Carter and the incumbent Gerald Ford, who did it because he was in a weak position.
	By 1987, the Commission on Presidential Debates...
	It was formed by the chairman of both Democrat and Republican parties.
	This year, he says, neither candidate agreed to a debate that was sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Abates.
	They skipped over something that's significant, and that was in the 90s, when you had this presidential commission that was put together by the two main parties.
	And they had a set of rules.
	And Ross Perot was able to qualify for those rules.
	They changed it after that to try to make sure that would never happen again.
	And then eventually what they did was they abandoned even the, before that, you had the League of Women Voters and stuff.
	So they abandoned that to give the Republican Party and the Democrat Party control over the debate process.
	And then they wound up getting rid of the commission.
	And so now they're just going to the two candidates to see if they wanted to debate.
	And they don't.
	Because even with that kind of control, the debates aren't safe enough for them.
	And they can be used, as the Democrats used it, against Biden.
	Third-party candidates like RFK Jr.
	have arbitrarily high restrictions placed on their participation.
	And of course, Dr. Shiva, can you imagine a debate where you actually had some issues being discussed?
	Can't have that. The result this year is the earliest presidential debate in the history of the series.
	And again, it was for a purpose.
	The nomination process consists of an interesting mix of pledged, unpledged, and superdelegates.
	There's no rule mandating that any of the delegates, even the pledged ones, have to vote for the candidate to which they are pledged, as I pointed out in the last section.
	The expanded vote-by-mail and early voting procedures implemented in the aftermath of the pandemic.
	No, it was put in by Trump.
	It was put in when there was no pandemic.
	Again, you had in the end of January, Trump's big pharma executive that he put in charge of the NHS declared an emergency.
	There was no emergency.
	There was no epidemic anywhere, let alone a global pandemic, meaning an epidemic all over the place.
	There wasn't an epidemic anywhere.
	Certainly not in China, where you had a handful of people in a country of several billion.
	Not a pandemic by any definition of the word.
	But they did things like vote by mail.
	The official record, he says, is that Biden won the most votes received by any presidential candidate in U.S. history.
	7 million more than Trump won by in 2020.
	10 million more than Barack Obama won in 2008.
	And remember that in 2020, Biden largely did not campaign, allegedly due to the ongoing COVID pandemic, again.
	A very unusual election in 2020, another very unusual election in 2024, because they've got to pull the strings to fix that.
	They know that the institutions are going to be changed as part of this fourth turning.
	They want to be the ones who rewrite the institutions.
	It's just that simple. That's why they're playing these games and everybody's...
	And, you know, you can't get people to wake up.
	Nobody wants to look at this.
	They're all focused on this person or that person.
	They hyper-personalize it.
	They take the bait.
	They believe everything these people are telling them.
	In the wake of the 2020 election, the inauguration was held in a city that was encamped by troops.
	25,000 troops deployed to the city at the time.
	You know, also thinking about just a couple of months before that, when they kicked off Stop the Steal.
	You had Steve Pachenik going on with Owen Schroyer at Infowars, telling everybody, two days after the election, already Trump had set this thing up.
	It was a sting. He printed the ballots.
	No, he didn't. The ballots are printed at each state level.
	But he lied, and he said that Trump had printed the ballots.
	They put these things out. They had them watermarked, and they had a blockchain connection with it, and quantum computings.
	All that was just total BS. Just using a bunch of buzzwords, but the key thing was to say that they had 20,000 National Guard troops out there rounding up the people in every state that had rigged this election against Trump.
	A total lie. Just like Steve Bannon had said on October 31st before the election.
	He told those Chinese people that were getting fleeced by him and by Guo.
	He said, when the election comes, it doesn't matter what happens.
	We're going to say we won and we're going to say F you, we won.
	That type of thing. And then, of course, they put the people out there saying, well, you know, it's a plot.
	We had that general who said, yeah, there was white hats and black hats who were fighting in Germany at the place where they, the computer center where they were rigging the election.
	Lie after lie after lie, we were told, by people who were part of the military-industrial complex to create the narrative for January the 6th, to fleece people just like Bannon was fleecing These Chinese followers of his and Guo's to fleece the people who supported Trump,
	to put them in danger, to tell them that there were 20,000 troops out there arresting people when they're going to send them into Washington, D.C., where there were 25,000 troops that were there.
	Only 5,000 were stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan.
	Think about that. Five times the number of troops they had in Iraq and Afghanistan.
	And, of course, they kind of stand back and Let some people get violent.
	And they came after everybody.
	And not only that, but they came after everybody who had a conservative ideology.
	Guilt by association.
	Guilt by ideology. It was a setup.
	By March 2020, 2,300 National Guard members remained in the city with plans to stay for two more months.
	And he says, think about this, in the Civil War, even after seven states had seceded, Lincoln, whose elections split a divided country, did not even need that level of security for his first inauguration.
	Troops didn't show up to Washington until a year after his election, even after states had seceded, because he hadn't started a war with anybody yet.
	Trump says he knows nothing about the Seriously Extreme Project 2025.
	That's his words. Seriously extreme.
	You see, he's distanced himself from the largest conservative think tank that's out there, Heritage Foundation.
	When we say that there's a choice between multiple Democrats on the ballot, you know, RFK Jr., if we include him, we've got three Democrats you can choose from.
	That's not an exaggeration.
	Trump is a New York City Democrat.
	He's always been with the Democrats.
	And it wasn't simply because he lived in New York.
	He partied with the Clintons.
	He partied with Jeffrey Epstein.
	He's not just a Democrat. He's a pedophile Democrat.
	He's a thoroughly debauched Democrat.
	And he's calling people that are looking...
	When you look at these policies like Project 2025...
	These are basically policies that go back to the Republican Party in the 1980s.
	I don't like it because it doesn't address what the real existential issues are today.
	Things like what happened in 2020 with the so-called pandemic, with the public health dictatorship that they've established.
	It doesn't address that.
	It's looking at the problems that we had 40 years ago.
	But it's not a radical and extreme document as Trump is calling it.
	Unless, like Trump, you are a radical, extreme Democrat.
	And I think we're going to see that in the second term.
	I've said it over and over again, that in the second term, you see most of these Republican presidents moving way to the left.
	Way to the left.
	And he's already doing it.
	He said at the rally that he had, he said, like some on the right, the severe right, came up with this Project 25.
	I don't even know.
	Some of them, I know who they are, but they're very, very conservative, he said.
	They're sort of the opposite of the radical left.
	You have the radical left and you got the radical right and they come up.
	I don't know what the H it is.
	It's Project 25.
	He's involved in the project and then they read it, some of the things, and they are extreme.
	They're seriously extreme.
	But I don't know anything about it.
	And I don't want to know anything about it.
	I know nothing.
	I know nothing. Yeah.
	Corporal Schultz.
	Again, he's a Democrat establishment Democrat guy.
	Project 2025. And this is the headline from the leftist independent in the UK. Trump says he knows nothing about this seriously extreme Project 2025, but it mirrors many of his proposed policies.
	They said the document includes plans to expand his executive authority, to replace civil servants with loyalists, to crush, as they put it, abortion rights.
	It's pro-life. That's awful, isn't it?
	To attack civil rights for LGBT. No, to stop them from grooming and molesting and mutilating children.
	To impose an anti-immigrant agenda.
	It's an anti-illegal immigrant agenda, among other policies.
	And so, I would support all of this as characterized, except for their language.
	But we talk about expanding executive authority.
	That's what's different than 40 years ago.
	Because now the right wants a dictator in Washington.
	They want an authoritarian dictator in Washington, just like the left has always wanted.
	That's why I say, the Republican Party has become the Democrats of my youth.
	They've got a Democrat now that they're all cheering.
	And the Democrats have become full-on Marxists.
	Full-on. But J.D. Vance is a technocrat.
	He's supported by the technocrats in Silicon Valley.
	We're going to talk about that. That's a different thing.
	It's also very dangerous.
	The plan would give Trump unprecedented executive authority over the federal government, says the Independent.
	While Trump claims to know nothing about the plan, he praised the Heritage Foundation and their, quote, plans for exactly what our movement will do, unquote.
	He said that two years ago in 2022.
	You know, and again, I've said in the past, I'm not a big fan of the Heritage Foundation.
	When there was the massive banning at Infowars in 2018, just before the midterms, and then in October, they banned 800 sites.
	After they banned info wars and nobody did anything about it.
	Trump didn't do anything about it as president.
	Nothing about it. Did not defend the First Amendment.
	They all said, well, this is coming from the corporations.
	And it was the Heritage Foundation and the Cato Institute that sold that idea.
	Well, it's just they're doing what they want to do.
	No, we knew that it was coming from the Democrats, and there was plenty of evidence at the time.
	There's more evidence now with the Twitter documents to show the smoking gun.
	But for the longest time, they maintained that the corporations could shut you down to the digital public square.
	Even if they were not being prodded and bribed and blackmailed by the federal government to do the censorship, even if that were the case, We already had Supreme Court decisions saying that if the public square is privately owned, that you can't censor public speech there.
	Because in 1946, people understood that rights come from God.
	That corporations come from government.
	Corporations exist.
	Because of government granted privileges.
	That's why they're easily blackmailed or bribed.
	Because their very existence is at the pleasure of government.
	Not so with our rights.
	No corporation has the right to take away your free speech in the public square.
	I mean, if you want to set up a soapbox in the middle of the mall, which is a retail space, no, that's a different thing.
	But we're talking about the public square, and these places are the digital public square.
	But anyway, you know, that was...
	These people were...
	We're celebrated by him in the Rose Garden in 2018 when he was president.
	And then in 2022, he said he liked their plans.
	He said, Heritage does such an incredible job.
	This is a great group. They're going to lay the groundwork and the detailed plans for exactly what our movement will do and what your movement will do when the American people give us a colossal mandate to save America.
	And he said that in 2022.
	Now, he says, they're extreme.
	They're extreme. Because he got a little bit of criticism for it.
	He is not going to stick to any issue.
	He's not going to stick to any principle because he has no principles.
	And he has no issues except to get himself in office.
	And if somebody's going to criticize him for something, he will sell them out just like he sold out gun rights when he was in office.
	Oh, yeah. Fortunately, I can do something about that.
	I don't need you guys to ban bump stocks.
	I can do that by executive order.
	Where did he get that idea?
	He also claims that the plan is extreme, but the document mirrors several policies that he himself has endorsed.
	Folks, if you believe that this is 4-D chess, you're nothing but a pawn.
	Then we have, what is the real agenda behind Trump?
	That's what I want to talk about, but let me get to some of these comments here.
	On Rumble, 12 June 1776.
	Thank you for the tip.
	He writes, liberate captured three branches of the U.S. government and join the show.
	Well, thank you very much. I appreciate that.
	ACSAB. I'm not sure how I'd even pronounce that.
	Thank you for the tip. He says, thanks for making the world so much better.
	Well, I wish I could. I just want to tell people how they can make the world better by focusing on their life and their family and their relationship with God and things like that.
	It's not going to be fixed in Washington.
	I'm really going to lay this out, what the threat is, this new threat that has now come up.
	On RockFan, Jason Barker.
	He says, I broke down the fake narrative of the great Trump economy.
	Yeah, good. He did not do well for the average person.
	Yet the supporters tout his economy.
	Well, that's good. Yeah, Jason Barker, Knights of the Storm, Foxhole Report.
	And, you know, when we look, that's the average person, right?
	Your kitchen economics that he broke down.
	But then when you look at it at the macroeconomic level, David Stockton wrote an entire book about it.
	I interviewed him.
	He talked about how bad Trump's war on capitalism is what he called it.
	What he was focusing on primarily was the massive increase in debt.
	Now, that is going to have ever-increasing repercussions for each of us at the kitchen table.
	But it is a, you know, this sort of Damocles that is hanging over all of our heads and hanging over the entire country, that massive debt that he built up.
	On Rumble, another tip from ACSAB. Thank you very much.
	Seriously think I'd be insane if this show wasn't around.
	Well, thank you. I don't want to drive anybody insane.
	Let's try to find our sane point.
	Everybody's got a laughing place, a place where they can go ha-ha, as I said at Splash Mountain.
	Before the ESG people purchased them out, we had a great time there.
	We always think about that.
	Travis is nodding his head.
	When the boys were little, we had a time show we swapped out at Disney, and it was an off-season.
	We knew enough about the place to know to go in September at the time, right after school had started at the time.
	They were little kids. They were...
	Maybe about 10 years old.
	And they had a thing called the E-Ticket Express, where they open up the big ride, which used to be the E-Tickets.
	When they first opened up, you could walk in.
	When Disney World first opened up, we were just under an hour away where I lived.
	And you could go to Disney World, just pay for parking, and just walk through the park.
	If you wanted to ride the rides, you could buy a book of tickets.
	And if you didn't use those tickets that day, you could use them the next time you came.
	It was really relaxed and nice.
	But anyway, the e-ticket was the thing for the big rides, you know, like Space Mountain or something like that.
	And so in each one of these areas, they had that premier ride was open.
	And we just went around and around and around on Splash Mountain.
	Had a great time.
	That was a lot of fun.
	The kids really liked that at the age that they were.
	So, always think about the laughing place.
	You've got to find that laughing place.
	Now more than ever, on Rock Fan, a Syrian girl says, It's amazing to me that after the Steve Pchenik lies about troops arresting people who interfered with the 2020 election, people continue to watch Alex Jones who pushed those lies.
	Yeah, it's... It's amazing to me, too.
	You know, every time I talk about it, I get criticized.
	Oh, you're a bitter old man.
	I'm not bitter. I'm very blessed that God has provided for us one way or the other.
	And I just had somebody, you know, really former donor now, former listener now, Really angry about the truth that I told about Alex.
	I said, look, you know, I treated him as I would a Christian brother.
	I went to him privately. And I said to him, and I've got the recording, and I'll play it for you one day.
	I said to him, you know that this is not true.
	You know that this stuff, this is Thursday after the election on Tuesday.
	I said, you know this is not true.
	You know it's going to be found out to be a lie.
	And I said, if you're found out to be a liar, nobody's going to believe you anymore.
	Well, I was wrong about that, wasn't I? And he didn't do anything about it.
	No, he can get away with lying over and over again to people, and there's no repercussions, just as you pointed out.
	You would think, wouldn't you?
	I mean, if I'm going to go to somebody for political advice, I would think that I want to make sure that they're at least trying to tell the truth, right?
	Anybody can be wrong.
	But if you're not even trying to tell the truth, if you're deliberately deceiving people, why would anybody pay attention to that?
	It's just the Hulk Hogan thing, I think.
	You know, it's a... I couldn't do that if I tried.
	I'm not a professional wrestler.
	On Rumble, DGA, David, have you ever thought of having Flynn, Paula White, or Julie Green on?
	No! No, I would not give them an audience.
	I don't like it when you bring somebody on and you have a debate.
	I mean, if we wanted to have...
	If we wanted to have a debate and we had a third party or something, I would do that.
	But I would not want to bring them on as a host and then do some kind of an ambush.
	Or even if they knew that I was oppositional to them.
	I don't think they'd come on.
	I mean, it's like RFK Jr.
	You know, if they know that you're not on board with them, they won't come on.
	So, no. But that's the other thing about it.
	It's like, you know, when you look at...
	The spiritual issues here.
	The real deception.
	And, you know, some people talked about a prayer that was held there.
	That, again, it was a person who was a contributor.
	She was a Sikh person.
	She could have been given acknowledgement for that contribution.
	But then to lead these people in a prayer to the one true God, she said, and I don't forget what pagan demon it was, but that she was praying to, and got people to bow their heads.
	You see, Flynn does the same thing.
	He leads people in plagiarized prayers from a theosophist.
	Look up Theosophy if you don't know.
	Elizabeth Clare Prophet.
	And he plagiarized a prayer from them.
	And they have these reawakened tour meetings in church buildings.
	And he's up there, let's have a prayer.
	And he starts doing this thing to our ascended masters and our seven rays and all this other kind of nonsense.
	And he's got people in this church building who are bowing their heads and repeating after him.
	I mean, it's even worse than what happened at the RNC. You know, people were not repeating after me like they repeat after Flynn.
	It's like, why does nobody have a problem with that?
	You know, you're talking about the paganization of the RNC. Isn't that the reawakened tour and what Flynn is doing?
	And again, to know that Flynn was one of the first people pushing this tranny stuff, you know, and pushing it on that Navy SEAL, Chris Beck, who now said, I can't believe they did this to me.
	I'm a grown man, I'm a Navy SEAL, and they gaslit me with a PSYOP. To do what he did.
	But let's talk about the real agenda that is there.
	I'm not going to take a break because I want to make sure I get to this before we need to roll to our interview with Goatree about Crowdsource.
	The real issue here folks is the technocracy and The fact these people have jumped in big time behind JD Vance JD Vance as I talked about last week And I talked about I covered Whitney Webb's got a great article talking about Palantir and some of these other things But I've been covering Palantir for a decade But everybody needs to be reminded of the fact that of what the technocracy wants to do
	Technocracy wants to set up a complete control grid a surveillance state that includes things like geospatial intelligence run through Palantir Or an organizations like that It's part of the military-industrial complex to create a police surveillance state, to create CBDC, to create universal basic income.
	And these people are all about, there's much about UBI as they are AI. And they see the two things connected.
	Because they're going to take away your job with AI, they want to give you UBI. And from this standpoint, Elon Musk and the rest of these people are no different from Michael Bloomberg, who when he was running for president in 2020, remember he ran for president then, He said, you know, we're going to get rid of these stupid farmers and so forth.
	You can't criticize the farmers.
	He was talking, he said, the farmers were replaced by the workers in the factories.
	And now, he says, those of us who are smart are going to be replacing everybody's jobs.
	And we need to come up with a way to keep them pacified so they don't come after us with guillotines.
	That's what he was talking about, universal basic income.
	And he was talking about going from an agrarian society to an industrial society, and now going from an industrial society to this technocracy that they envision.
	And if you go back to 2020, also, Andrew Yang, who, when he began his campaign, it was about universal basic income.
	It was solely about universal basic income.
	As a matter of fact, the person who said you ought to have Flynn and these other people on, I invited Andrew Yang to come on.
	And he accepted, you know, just like RFK Jr.
	And both of them canceled right before the show, when they figured out what the show was about.
	And so, you know, that's one of the reasons I don't do it.
	I don't have the time to waste to try to set up these things and all that kind of stuff, just have somebody cancel because they don't want to be opposed.
	And I was going to oppose Andrew Yang on universal basic income.
	I'd been talking about it for quite some time at that point.
	But Elon Musk supported him.
	I don't think he gave him money.
	I thought he gave him money, but when I looked up to see how much money he gave him, they said that he didn't give him any money.
	And I guess it's because Elon Musk is not stupid.
	He's only going to give money to politicians who are going to give him something in return when they get elected.
	And that's why he's, this guy who's not contributed to political campaigns, he's giving Trump $180 million.
	What do you think he thinks he's going to get out of Trump?
	He's not throwing money away.
	These people, these billionaires, are pretty tight-fisted with their money.
	Even Trump, when you look at it, the poor fireman's family, the poor guy that got shot and killed.
	Trump set up a GoFundMe.
	Trump didn't give him money.
	He set up a GoFundMe.
	At the convention, he read a letter and he goes, here's a guy who did a donation.
	He gave a million dollars. Trump didn't give a million dollars.
	Other people did. Trump's not going to part with his money.
	Elon Musk isn't going to part with his money unless he thinks he's going to get something out of it.
	What do you think he thinks he's going to get for $180 million?
	And here's what Musk says about universal basic income.
	What to do about mass unemployment.
	This is going to be a massive social challenge.
	And I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income.
	I don't think we're going to have a choice.
	Universal basic income?
	Universal basic income. I think it's going to be necessary.
	So it means that unemployed people will be paid across the globe?
	Yeah. Because there is no job?
	A machine or a robot is taking over?
	There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better.
	Okay. Well, that's it.
	You see, they've used this all along.
	We're going to take the smart ones of us, like Michael Bloomberg, like Elon Musk, like all these people in Silicon Valley.
	They're smarter than you and I. These elitists see themselves as a technocracy.
	Elon Musk's grandfather, Joshua Haldane, was kicked out of Canada.
	They brought charges up against him, but they didn't get a conviction, so he left and went to South Africa because he tried to replace the Canadian government with a technocracy.
	And that was back in the 1930s when H.G. Wells was writing The Shape of Things to Come, and then they did the movie Things to Come, and you had all these people like H.G. Wells, Aldous Huxley, and Huxley's brother Julian coined the term transhumanism.
	They're transhumanist.
	They believe in the singularity.
	They're atheists who believe they're going to become gods, that they are going to merge with machines and live forever, that they are smarter than us.
	They will rule us with their robots.
	Folks, this is one of the most dangerous philosophies that's come along in a long time.
	It is purely satanic.
	And don't get fooled by the conservative things that they might say from time to time, or by the idea that Elon Musk says we need more people.
	You know, colonize space and all this kind of stuff.
	I mean, it's the kind of stuff that's right up Alex's alley, and he used to always talk about that.
	But, you know, it's the...
	Don't get fooled by that.
	That's not conservative.
	It's not Christian. It's not Western civilization.
	It is antithetical to all of those things.
	As one person said, look, if Musk is spending this kind of money, he's not altruistic.
	If he's spending the money, he's looking at this as an investment.
	And I'll say that about Twitter.
	All these people, oh, he spent $40 billion to say free speech.
	No, he's got designs for X. He's got designs for the data that's there.
	As a matter of fact, the people who reposted him talking about universal basic income said the data about people is the most important thing.
	And they're pushing. They think that's a good thing.
	That surveillance state is a good thing.
	Now, that's the most amazing thing about his purchase of Twitter is that people think that it's altruistic.
	It's not. He wants to...
	Yeah, when he merged with PayPal, when he merged with Peter Thiel, their two companies, and they created PayPal, he had already something that was called X. He wants to make it like WeChat or something in China, where it's an all-in-one social media payment platform and all the rest of the stuff,
	plus... Having unfiltered access to what everybody is saying, he has talked about social media as being the hive mind, as Twitter or X being the hive mind.
	He's not altruistic.
	Don't misread his motives here.
	His full-throated endorsement of Trump completes his transformation from tech mogul to internet poster to red-pilled Twitter owner to Republican mega-donor.
	Yeah, it's an investment for him.
	And here's somebody else that it's an investment for.
	Larry Fink. Trump has aligned himself with yet another active player in the crypto industry.
	Larry Fink, founder of BlackRock.
	You know, the company that has $17.5 billion worth of Bitcoins.
	This is a crypto site, and they're very excited about this.
	It says that Larry Fink...
	Trump and Trump share a mutual respect that has grown over the years.
	He has invested money in BlackRock and so forth.
	Last week, there were rumors that Trump was considering J.P. Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon.
	But reports say it's really Larry who has been Trump's go-to guy for economic advice.
	Now, there's a lot of talk that...
	That it's going to be Larry Fink for Treasury Secretary, and that it'll be Jamie Demon for Commerce Secretary.
	Because, you know, as Commerce Secretary, Jamie Demon, who is perceived as anti-crypto, can do things to punish crypto or to establish CBDC. He could do one or both of those things.
	Because, remember, the moves that are being made at state level reflect on the Universal Commercial Code, the UCC stuff.
	Larry, despite his focus on ESG, environmental social governance, was appointed to Trump's Business Advisory Council.
	This is not their first rodeo.
	Not their first date.
	Not their first kiss.
	This stuff has been going on for a while.
	He was on Trump's Advisory Council.
	And so, when you look at what is happening with the people, and by the way, let me just say this before I move on.
	If you go back to 2016, The fall of 2016, the election where Trump was running against Hillary, she was considered to be a shoe-in.
	And so she's talking about who her picks are going to be, just like Trump is now, right now, considered to be a shoe-in.
	Perhaps he's peaked early.
	But as he's talking about what his cabinet is going to be and other people are talking about, same thing was happening with Hillary Clinton in 2016.
	Guess who she wanted for Treasury Secretary?
	The same guy that Trump wants.
	Larry Fink of BlackRock.
	Treasury Secretary for Hillary Clinton.
	Treasury Secretary for Trump.
	Tell me that there's a difference between these people.
	And I said it before.
	I said the reason they had to have Trump in in 2016 is It's because can you imagine Hillary Clinton locking everybody down?
	What would have happened?
	What would the conservatives, what would the deplorables have done?
	If she told you to wear a mask, if she told you to stay six feet apart from people and all the rest of these Simon Says nonsense things, nobody would have done it.
	They did it for Trump. They did it because Trump is paying the governors and so forth.
	She could have paid the governors, but it would have created a lot of pushback.
	JD Vance. All these things are coming in because of the money that JD Vance got.
	And I pointed out last week, as we were talking about the connections to...
	Of Peter Thiel.
	And again, Whitney Webb has done a very long comprehensive article.
	It's great. And if you go back and look at Palantir, I've been talking about them since 2014.
	And I've watched them at Bilderberg.
	Regular attendees at Bilderberg.
	Alex Karp, the guy who runs Palantir.
	Always a big military industrial complex warmonger.
	He wants war everywhere, especially against us domestically.
	He wants to look at everything that we're doing.
	Massive data mining company.
	They got a lot of government funding saying they were doing it for the intelligence services, doing it for the military, but it's going to be used against us domestically.
	And so these people have always been there at Bilderberg.
	They have frequently attended Davos.
	And let me play for you what Peter Thiel just came out and criticized Davos.
	Feeding this to the people who, just like they want to believe that Elon Musk is on their side and on the side of Trump.
	Well, he is on the side of Trump if he pays Trump.
	Maybe Trump is on his side.
	Peter Thiel, criticizing Davos.
	Listen to this. I went to the World Economic Forum in Davos the last time in 2013.
	Of course, they have the same ideas as the mob.
	In some ways, it is a mob.
	And people are there only in their capacity as representatives of corporations or governments or NGOs.
	It really hit me.
	There are simply no individuals.
	There are no individuals in the room.
	There's nobody there who's representing themselves.
	And it's this notion of the future I reject.
	It's this picture of the future where the future will be a world where there are no individuals, there are no people with...
	Well, they do have individuals.
	They call them stakeholders.
	The corporations are stakeholders, but let's make no mistake about it.
	Larry Fink is setting up BlackRock to do exactly what Larry Fink wants it to do.
	He's got an agenda, and it's in lockstep with Herr Klaus.
	As Ursula Fond of Lying calls it.
	But if you go back and if you take a look at Peter Thiel, he said, you know, I went to it once back in 2013.
	I don't like these people.
	They don't respect the individual.
	Well, he's been a regular attendee at Bilderberg.
	What's the difference between Davos and Bilderberg?
	One of them is a public face.
	It is now, because of that public face and because of Herr Klaus, it is now despised by the world.
	Bilderberg was always secret.
	I always felt that, you know, if you're going to have a conspiracy, it's going to be at the place where it's all kept secret and under wraps is where most of the work is going to be done.
	And so Peter Thiel was at Bilderberg and a regular attendee.
	And if we go back to, I think this was 2015, you'll see Luke Grodowski and stuff.
	And this report was, I don't know who filmed this, it was put up on Infowars site.
	But you know Infowars doesn't have a problem with Peter Thiel or Elon Musk, do they?
	These technocrats connected to either Bilderberg or Davos.
	Maybe that's why they don't cover Bilderberg anymore.
	But here's, when they're following him along, he's got a bunch of people, small reporters, because mainstream media doesn't do this, trying to get him to make a statement.
	And he's walking along, and I think, so he just stops.
	He goes, okay, I'm going to say this, and then I'm going to leave.
	Don't ask me any other questions.
	And he makes a statement. Here's a statement at Bilderberg.
	Peter Thiel, who just told you, I don't like Davos.
	Oh, he loves Bilderberg, though.
	So they're walking along. Finally he stops and talks to them.
	I'll leave it at one statement and then that's it.
	I believe it's always important to exchange views with people no matter what their perspectives are.
	I think that we have a lot of problems in our society and we need to be finding ways to talk to people.
	We need to find ways to talk to people.
	Where not everything is completely transparent.
	Libertarianism is not synonymous with radical transparency.
	That's often an argument that the Stasi would make in East Germany, where everything had to be monitored by society.
	And I think often we have the best conversations in smaller groups where not everything is being monitored.
	And that's how you can have very honest conversations and how you can think better about the future.
	Thank you very much. So your solution is the New World War.
	No statements. No taking no questions.
	He makes a statement, and that's it.
	He walks off. Okay, so we don't want to have something like the Stasi, where society monitors everything.
	No, it wasn't society that was monitoring everything.
	I mean, they did employ as snitches everybody in society.
	But the Stasi was government, and it was government that was watching what everybody was saying.
	And what Peter Thiel and the companies that he created and founded and funded like Palantir are doing, they are the high-tech Stasi.
	How cynical to say that.
	Oh, well, we should have some privacy.
	Well, what about my privacy?
	You don't care about my privacy, do you?
	No, you're going to expose everything and repeat everything to the government.
	You are the Stasi for the government.
	Just because you're using your machines and just because we don't see it.
	You know, I was saying to Karen the other day, I said, everybody likes to say that, you know, the 10 Bill of Rights, oh, they've all been violated except for the third one.
	I believe the third one has been violated.
	I believe it's been violated by these types of things, by the surveillance state.
	You know, the real issue with quartering troops in your home, Was the fact that they were going to be there observing everything that you did and reporting it, right?
	That was the biggest issue.
	Yeah, it was an imposition.
	It was an expense. It was an inconvenience and all the rest of this stuff.
	And they have made it very convenient.
	You don't even know they're there.
	They're just like Big Brother, a fly on the wall, watching everything you're doing.
	But you are quartering in your computer, in your personal papers.
	You have the NSA, you got the CIA, you got Homeland Security, you got all these different organizations, you got Palantir that he created.
	They're all there, sitting in your living room, listening to you.
	And of course, you know, Larry Fink talked about how he, blockchain tokens and BlackRock's plan to own the fractionalized world.
	You don't know where this is going? It's going into this creating derivatives of everything, which is part of their great taking.
	And this is what is said by Technocracy News.
	Imagine tokenizing everything.
	Well, Larry Fink already has.
	He's actually made a verb out of ETF. Imagine tokenizing everything in the world that has value and converting it to blockchain.
	Things you own, things that companies own, things that governments own, the oceans, the forests, the animals, the air, the entire environmental ecosphere.
	Estimates of value easily exceed $300 trillion.
	Now imagine this as the currency base.
	For sustainable activity in all commercial development.
	And imagine putting the guy who is at the epicenter of this scheme in as Treasury Secretary, which is what Trump is talking about doing, which is what Hillary Clinton was going to do.
	They're one and the same.
	Before we run out of time here on Rockfin, Jose Aguero, I'm sure I did.
	Thank you for the tip. Says, the new Twisters movie also confirmed for me that this was probably planned out well in advance.
	Since when does Hollywood paint conservative Americans in a good light?
	Hmm. The movie was released just over a week after the ear incident.
	Yeah, from ear to eternity.
	On Rockfin, Jason Barker.
	Thank you for the tip again. I appreciate that.
	Says, I was unable to stream Knights of the Storm on X this past weekend because I'm not a blue checkmark customer.
	Oh. It is a pay-to-play network now, complete with shadow banning as a feature.
	Yeah. You know, I got the blue checkmark because I wanted to be able to put up longer post text to describe what was going on with it, plus longer videos.
	But yeah, it is a pay-to-play thing, and it's going to become more and more like that.
	They are shutting things down left and right.
	Well, I'm going to play for you the interview.
	I don't have time to do a setup for it, but it's still going on.
	And, you know, this CrowdStrike thing that's running through Microsoft, and Goatree's got a lot to say about it.
	It's going to take a long time to do this.
	At first, I looked at it. It's like, okay, it's just one line of code that needs to be fixed.
	But you've got to boot up and then find that line of code, and you've got to do that in millions of computers.
	How long is it going to take? Nobody really knows.
	What's behind it? A lack of security.
	And the other question is, what are the political connections of CrowdStrike to Hillary Clinton and to a lot of other things?
	The Russiagate stuff and everything, they're all in there, and they've got connections to the election as well.
	Here's my interview that I recorded with Goat Tree on Saturday.
	Well, joining us now is Gautry, and he's been on several times talking about computers, cybersecurity issues, and other things like that.
	So when I saw what was happening with CrowdStrike, I wanted to get him on to get his take on this.
	As a matter of fact, he was sending me some stuff as the program was going on Friday, and I didn't see it until after the program.
	So I wanted to do this special report and put this out.
	Now, the name may sound familiar to you.
	It took me a moment to kind of place it.
	It's like, oh yeah, those are the guys that were involved with Hillary Clinton and the Russiagate stuff, and they were the ones who flagged it for her, and they were the ones who first put this out.
	And then, of course, as CNN puts it, they said, CrowdStrike was the first to publicly sound the alarm about Russia's interference in the 2016 election.
	Well, that's suspicious. And then CrowdStrike's assessment was later confirmed by U.S. intelligence agencies.
	Who lied left and right, and that's all been confirmed now.
	CNN just flushed about four or five years of history down the memory hole, because we've known for several years, this has been thoroughly debunked, they kept everybody going for a couple of years, but all this stuff about 17 security agencies and everything, that was all Hillary Clinton, and we've gone through all that, but it's all still news to CNN who pretends that this didn't happen.
	So now CrowdStrike is at the center.
	Of worldwide outage in all kinds of things, from transportation to banking.
	We've got stores that are closed that can't do business.
	It is massive because of something that is in their code.
	It does not affect Macs.
	It doesn't affect Linux, but it affects Windows.
	But it has affected businesses and airports around the world.
	We've got entire airlines that have shut down.
	Some of them are using whiteboards to put stuff out.
	So I guess, unless you want to fly Amish Air, you may be out of luck with traveling anywhere.
	So I want to get Goatree on and get his take on this.
	Thank you for joining us, Goatree. Happy Saturday, David.
	This is going to be fun.
	Yeah, it is.
	Go ahead. What do you think is going on with this?
	You're looking at this, and one of the things that you pointed out is so interesting that it's just one little line of code, 15 characters that's caused all this grief.
	Yeah. You know, CrowdStrike...
	Basically, I'll just read how they describe themselves.
	CrowdStrike services provides the best practice framework needed to access and enhance cybersecurity maturity levels for election systems.
	Oh yeah, election systems, boys and girls, to protect the integrity of the voting process and sanctity of the democratic institutions under which we thrive.
	Yeah. Oh, they're already advertising.
	They're going to be handling the elections.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Yeah, there it is right there.
	Cybersecurity for election systems.
	Isn't that great? You know, we got NewsGuard from Microsoft that's going to make sure the news is good.
	They got ElectionGuard to make sure that elections are going to be good.
	And we also got CrowdStrike, who's going to make sure that the elections are safe from any tampering.
	Yeah, and, you know, I've called this, I guess...
	Since it's a cybersecurity company doing it, we can't call it a hack.
	Let's call it an exploit.
	I've named it the revenge of the closed source strikes again.
	What that means is, this is geek speak for vendor backdoors, vendor ports, open ports, whatever geek speak you want to apply to this old DOS Windows operating system.
	Yeah, and that's the key thing, that Windows hasn't really fundamentally changed forever, right?
	Decades of stuff. It's built on top of this garbage that's got a really old foundation, doesn't it?
	It is antiquated.
	It is not changed.
	They just put new skins on it, and these little...
	I mean, this has been around since 19...
	Well, when did Bill Gates steal it?
	1982. Yeah, that's right.
	And it's never been modified for current operations.
	I mean, everybody... Okay, all these guys that built their careers on Windows and this, they're going to say you don't know what you're talking about.
	But basic codes and basic commands are still DOS. Mm-hmm.
	And it's not changed.
	Yeah. And...
	Well, for instance, it only puts 15 characters in this code string.
	Can you think of 15 characters to crash millions of Windows-operated laptops, desktops, and servers?
	Can we talk a little bit about what is actually happening?
	I mean, they're getting the blue screen of death.
	It's not booting up. Is that correct?
	The people have it. Right.
	And what it has done is it's locked.
	Let me go back for just a second.
	I'm working on my notes because this has been like kicking over Pandora's box and Medusa pops out.
	Because this is not what it looks like.
	Basically, it is causing these machines...
	To continually try to reboot up, but it's not allowing them to.
	It's getting you conflicts, and you have to go into the back way in, which is through the...
	Oh, the safe.
	I don't use Windows that much.
	I mean, I quit using Windows years ago.
	But... You have to go into safe mode, then you have to scroll through, find the file, find this one 15 character code, and manually remove it.
	And, you know, you have billions of lines of code all through these servers and things like that.
	So you're looking for a 15 character code to remove.
	Right now, if you think about it, it's so surreal because there's trillions of lines of code out there making things operate, and billions of dollars spent on digital security, and a simple little 15-character code Bricks millions of windows devices on the critical infrastructure.
	Wow. So if you reboot this thing and you get into safe mode, then you've got to go into some kind of a text editor to try to find that one line, those 15 characters and remove it.
	Is that what the real hitch is?
	I lost your audio there.
	Did you drop your phone? No.
	Okay. We're back.
	We're back. We're back. Yeah.
	Okay. No, what you've got to do is, and this goes back to DOS. I mean, these guys that want to argue with me, they can argue till their tonsils roll out on the floor.
	You've got to go back to the file, which is written on DOS backbone.
	Open that file.
	And then go through and locate that 15-line code and remove it manually.
	And that's the time-consuming thing.
	And that's going to be different for every computer, presumably, because of the things that have been put in there?
	Where that is located in the file?
	In theory, yes.
	So it's not just simply...
	Go in and open up.
	Hopefully, the IT people are smart enough not to change the name on the file, but some of them do.
	Yeah. Wow. Let me read this to you.
	This is from Futurism. It says, Microsoft recommends rebooting your computer 15 times as blue screen of death strikes worldwide.
	The subtitle is... Have you tried turning it on and off again?
	Which is the first thing tech support always asks you.
	And then on and off again and again and again, and they said as the world is reeling, this is their instructions to try it 15 times.
	I mean, if you want to try the goat tree method, hit it with a hammer a couple of times.
	If that don't work, bounce it off the floor a couple of times.
	Yeah, but there's some people who are doing that.
	I bet there's some people doing that right now because they're so upset about what is happening with this.
	And so we've got all these computers that have gone down, and they're saying it might take weeks, and I guess it's because it's difficult to find that particular piece of code to fix it, right?
	Well, let's put it into concept.
	You know, average business, let's just say...
	I don't know, a million dollar a year business.
	They probably have 25, maybe 30, some of them, you know, in automation and things like that.
	They have 50 laptops or desktops or whatever to operate their business, their people and their business.
	And they only have one IT guy.
	Well, it may take this one IT guy an hour per day.
	Laptop, desktop, server, whatever, to clear it.
	So right there, you have got, well, 50 to 60 manuires just bringing the computers back online.
	So if you get these multinationals, their ITs usually know more than, let's see, the way they like to work is Hmm, seven.
	Let's just say they've got a thousand computers down.
	They've got seven IT people.
	They've got a problem.
	You know, we're talking weeks or months.
	Yeah, yeah. I see what the problem is, yeah.
	Yeah, you multiply it out by all the different computers.
	Right, it's not the code.
	It is the correction that is going to be causing the delays.
	That's right. And of course, these computers are not necessarily going to be all in one physical location.
	They're going to be distributed to a lot of different places for all these IT guys to try to...
	It's crazy.
	You've been talking about this...
	This occurred on a Friday.
	Wait till people get in the office.
	Those that work in the office on Friday, wait till they get in on Monday and get their surprise.
	Yeah. Wow. Well, you've been talking about this kind of stuff for quite some time.
	The kind of exploits.
	You were talking about it with railroads and things like that, right?
	Yeah. This is...
	To explain this in a simple way...
	You know, when we were talking about this Palestine-Ohio railroad crash, I sent you that video of the railroad dude opening the remote shack that had the automated safety equipment in it.
	It was all there.
	Radio, computer, keyboard, everything just sitting there waiting to rock and roll.
	This stuff will send in information.
	Either event-driven or on a schedule.
	Well, me and Mr.
	Black Hat, the only thing between me and it is a padlock.
	So if I would knock that padlock and get in there and insert, I don't know, let's just say a 50-character line of code that would take down that railroad, I could insert it, embed it into the...
	Hourly or event transmission, when that happens, it's going to deploy on their email server or whichever server it goes to, whatever it's routed to.
	When they open it up, it starts breaking things.
	Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.
	And as you pointed out before, you know, a lot of these things ship with a default passcode that is there in the manual, and a lot of times they don't change the default password.
	And if they do change the default password, frequently what they'll do is write it there next to the password for the next guy who's coming in because it's a hassle for them to write it on the wall.
	You know, that's just human nature.
	That's what's happening with these systems.
	Yeah. Well, this is the same principle that happened with this CrowdStrike.
	CrowdStrike does it as an update.
	Well, basically, these remote nodes are sending updates.
	It may be information.
	And you can insert Mount malware into it and do the same thing.
	I mean, if the header comes across a 1 o'clock update, everything's fine, dandy.
	And at the bottom, you insert your code, and the system's going to read the code, too.
	And it can execute that code.
	Because machines are dumb.
	Computers are dumb. They're driven on commands.
	So if it sees this update, this operational update, and sees code on it, it could actually execute that code.
	And then you have the domino effect or the waterfall effect happening.
	Talk a little bit about the Colonial Pipeline as well, when we had that situation happening.
	Well, this was one.
	It was either 2015 or 2016.
	We did some pen testing on a pipeline.
	And these used these very small devices that basically took pressure, flow, and all these rates.
	That was needed to make the pipeline function efficiently.
	And they would send in these one-hour updates.
	Well, they kept these in these plastic.
	They weren't even locked.
	They were in these, like, plastic things where your water sprinkler is.
	We popped that open.
	We took the disc out, put ours in it.
	And we waited about an hour, and they started getting alarms at the master system, and ours was not meant to hurt anything.
	It was just simply a spoof letting them know that we were in the system.
	I think we were playing disco music and had a flashing screen.
	And that's what they hire you for.
	They hire you as a white hat hacker to find the vulnerabilities and report them to them.
	And to play some disco music occasionally.
	Yeah. You know, play them some KC and the Sunshine Band.
	Or Yoko Ono screaming at night.
	Yeah. No, no.
	We only save that for squatters.
	It rarely is.
	Basically, we let them know we were in the system, and if we were up to no good, we could do anything we chose to.
	So we made them listen to some really weird disco music because they're punished.
	Yeah, that's interesting. You know, when we look at this, and again, we keep seeing this over and over again, we've had a couple of, now Colonial Pipeline, they had a hack that, from what it was reported, it attacked their counting system and not the pipeline.
	Is that correct? Yes.
	And that seems to be...
	These ancillary systems, I mean, we saw that with the airlines that got shut down for like a 24-hour period because somebody hacked into the NOTAM system, which is a warning system that tells the planes if there's some incident in or around an airport or on a runway or something like that.
	So it's just kind of a news alert broadcast.
	But if they didn't have that ability to warn planes and that was taken down, the FAA just shut down all of the planes.
	For about a 24-hour period.
	Yes. Well, you've got right now, just off this exploit, thousands of flights either very delayed or canceled.
	I mean, you've got people that are basically stranded at the moment.
	Well, we're talking about this on Saturday.
	Yesterday afternoon, I looked and they said that all of United and all of American Airlines were shut down.
	So I don't know how extensive that is in the United States.
	But all their planes, all their planes are shut down.
	And like I said, 15 character codes, what's done it.
	And I would hate to be part of their IT department.
	These guys aren't going to get home for a month.
	But, you know, you're going back to how to get into these systems.
	It doesn't matter where you find the vulnerability.
	You can exploit it.
	It's like with Colonial Pipelines.
	Well, they found it in the...
	Or payroll or whatever department they got into.
	When you're approving a network, you look for the vulnerability.
	You don't care where it is.
	Because once you get in, you can burrow to wherever you want to go.
	So, I mean, I could, in theory, find an unguarded, I don't know, site for their janitorial staff.
	I'm in. And, you know, you could have the janitorial department of doom sitting there terrorizing the company.
	That's a real hits-the-fan scenario, isn't it?
	Yeah. Literally.
	Well, you know, we link this thing.
	So this thing is caught in this loop trying to boot up, I guess, is what is happening when this thing goes through.
	And they've got to manually remove this.
	And, you know, it's time-consuming for each one of these things.
	Just multiply it out by all the computers that this has been put on.
	They can't do it evidently remotely because the computer can't boot up.
	So it's got to be fixed at each and every one of these.
	You know, we talked about this before, the blaster worm and things like that.
	We've got a history of this.
	One person is going back to Y2K. They said, this is what we feared about Y2K, but it's really happened.
	And, of course, shortly after that, there was a blaster worm as well, right?
	Yeah, the blaster worm goes back to, I think it was 2003.
	It was an old...
	Well, once again, you know, it goes back to DOS. They'd say, oh, this is all the Windows, blah, blah, blah.
	Basically, I forget which Windows platform it happened to, but it bricked them up the same way in 2003.
	And I think it was XP, Windows XP. That's what it was.
	Mm-hmm. You know, everybody says, oh, it's all correct.
	It's fixed. Well, here it is, 21 years later, it's back.
	Same exploit. And the IT people, a lot of them weren't even born or were watching Teletubbies in 2003, and they're getting a dose of something that's been around for years.
	Twenty-some-odd years.
	Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah.
	And everybody, I mean, this goes back to the backbone of Wendis.
	This is all dust-related.
	People can argue with me, and they can carry on, and, you know, it's like, that's fine.
	But if you know, really, truly know the architecture of Wendis, it's 40-something-year-old architecture.
	Mm-hmm. It's just been re-skinned and has some...
	Various things added, but the crux of it, the backbone of it, same as it was 1984-85.
	Yeah, that's true.
	Well, let's talk a little bit about the conspiracy theories that are out there.
	We've got, this is put out of mainstream media to cover up for this stuff, and it was pushed out by Drudge Report.
	Online conspiracy theories abound after the major global IT crash, and it appears, this is a company that I'd never seen their name before, and Talking about this, and Siabra, C-Y-A-B-R-A, have you heard of them?
	Siabra. It is a disinformation security company.
	So these are people, you know, we've got people that want to make sure that we don't have any disinformation out there, but this is a disinformation security company.
	And they're focused on shutting down these conspiracy theories before they travel around the world, right?
	Well, good luck with that.
	Come on, come to me, the disinformation company.
	I'll take y'all to school.
	I've never heard of them, but I don't pay attention to them because they basically aren't on my radar.
	If they want to make a run at me, welcome to.
	I'll show them some different disinformation.
	But I've sent you some direct connections I want you to follow up on.
	Because CrowdStrike is in a partnership with the WEF. And you know that the World Economic Forum is a warning of mass cyber strikes.
	Yeah. Yeah.
	That was a couple years ago.
	They were talking about Cyber Polygon, I think, wasn't it?
	I think it was 2022, if I'm not mistaken.
	But they're warning everybody. I think they still are.
	Yeah. Oh, yeah. Still talking about it.
	And so that was really the purpose of this news article, was to inoculate the World Economic Forum, to give them immunity from these consumers.
	Because people don't like the World Economic Forum, it's been the brunt of these conspiracy theories.
	Well, it's because they've been talking about how this is what's going to happen, and then it happens with a company that is connected deeply with them.
	It's the one that pulls it off.
	Well, it gets better, though.
	W.E.F. and CrowdStrike, it's easy to find.
	Just go to their website.
	They'll tell you that they're partners with the W.E.F. and they are globally involved in elections with, now this is the good part, working partnership with the W.E.F. linked to Global Cyber Alliance.
	Now the misinformation guys you gave me, I'm not even going to pay attention to them.
	The Global Cyber Alliance is what you need to research.
	Everybody that's going to be listening to this, have a look at Global Cyber Alliance.
	You've never heard of them, but they are part of the WEF, and that's really interesting.
	Yeah, and this is...
	Sorry, go ahead.
	No, no, go ahead.
	But I just want everybody to focus on this global cyber alliance.
	Focus on the global cyber alliance and focus on the connections to elections, because that's really what this is about.
	I think we've got to go back to paper.
	I mean, it's just, you know, there's no perfect system, but when you go back to something that is physical like that, It keeps away the global thieves that can break in everywhere and multiply this.
	You know, in the same way that what we're talking about in terms of doing the repair on this, it is difficult to get that done because you've got a limited number of people that can go out there and fix these different machines.
	And that's the very reason why you want to have paper elections.
	You know, I know you're going to have some crooked areas like Chicago where they're going to stuff the ballots regardless of what you do or what form they're in.
	But what you do when you have a physical ballot like that, what you do is you make an obstacle for them that they can't be everywhere all at once and change all these things.
	But they can do that if it's computerized.
	Well, here's where it gets interesting.
	Crowd strikes are providing security for the United States elections on November 5th.
	Mm-hmm. What if these elections aren't going the way they see fit, and they have another update, and they break the election machines?
	Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.
	Yeah. Well, that's impossible.
	Well, look what they've just done.
	Yeah. Oh, no.
	I remember I've talked many times about what happened in Brazil with Smartmatic.
	You know, that was one of the first electronic voting machine companies at the time.
	It was started in Venezuela with some friends of Hugo Chavez to keep him in office.
	But they've had accusations of disruption and fraud.
	And several states in Mexico, in the Philippines, in Brazil.
	And in Brazil, you had exactly that scenario.
	You had this leftist who was really lagging behind the polls from all indications.
	She was booed off out of the stadium the day before the election football stadium.
	And she was losing significantly.
	And then all the machines go down.
	And then they're down for a while.
	And then when they come back up, she's switched positions with the other guy.
	And so, yeah, it is very easy for them to do that type of thing with electronic machines.
	Well, let's say, for instance, yesterday, today, Saturday, it would be Friday, Arizona was having their early valeting for, I don't know what it was, it may have been primaries, early election, early voting, I don't know.
	They had that same event happen.
	Hmm. Right in the middle of the elections.
	All from this exploit.
	It's kind of like, you know, who watches the watchers, right?
	The problem with government is that we're not angels, as Madison said.
	So we need to have government.
	But when we have government, who watches the government?
	Because they're made up of men who are not angels.
	And the same thing happens when you talk about Or when you talk about cybersecurity, who watches the watchers?
	How do we keep this thing under control?
	How do we know that CrowdStrike, that has been involved in nefarious things just eight years ago at the center of these false claims about the election at the time, how do we know what they're doing?
	Are they an honest broker? They've insinuated themselves pretty much everywhere.
	I didn't realize they had such a massive footprint globally.
	Well, the weird part about all this is, okay, they disrupted Arizona elections yesterday.
	This exploit comes only five days after the attempted assassination of President Trump.
	Yeah, that's right.
	I mean, there's just too many coincidences to ignore here, wouldn't you think?
	And who watches the watchers there?
	Who watches the Secret Service to make sure that they're actually doing their job?
	That they're not setting things up, you know?
	It's just another example. It's very much like that, except this is the computer version of it.
	Yeah, and they want to send the...
	Cyber disinformation dudes after me.
	Bring it! Yeah, after both of us.
	That's why, you know, we have to call it the way we see it.
	It is extremely suspicious.
	Their connections to the World Economic Forum and their connections to the elections are very suspicious.
	At the very least, you know, again, when you're looking at the situation, the shooting there in Pennsylvania with Trump, you look at it in terms of incompetence, and it's always these two things.
	Is it incompetence or is it maliciousness?
	Or both. Or it could be both.
	Yeah, exactly. Because people can use that incompetence in a malicious way.
	Some people can use that. And so it's always difficult to look at this.
	Weaponized incompetence. What's that?
	Yeah, weaponized incompetence.
	Otherwise known as DEI. Didn't earn it.
	Yeah, that's right. Well, it certainly is interesting, and we'll be following this.
	Anything else that we haven't covered that you want to mention before we call it quits here?
	No, I mean, that's pretty much it.
	This is all documented, and if your listeners want to take it upon themselves to go start doing some digging and researching, You know, they're going to be surprised with what they find.
	And another thing, if we get this word out, the thing about it is, even if this is actually what we think, shining light on this stuff always makes them alter their game plan.
	If everybody knows what's up, they suddenly aren't able to operate in the dark and They may pivot off of whatever they have planned.
	That's right. If it's malice, you want to shine the light on it.
	If it's incompetence, you want to shine the light on it.
	So, you know, we look at this and it's like, is this incompetence or is it malice?
	Either way, we need to shine the light on it.
	And already, you know, we got the CEO of CrowdStrike is out there getting visibly angry with it because he's had, I don't know how much the stock is down now and off hours trading and everything, but yesterday it lost a little over 10%.
	It'll probably keep going down if people have still got their computers down.
	And we'll have a lot of computers down at the beginning of the week.
	It's going to continue to go into free fall.
	And I hope he's got a golden parachute because he may be defenestrated pretty soon.
	Thrown out the window.
	I hate to admit I live like a winning room.
	I shorted him yesterday.
	So I hope he's crying crocodile tunes.
	There you go. That's the way to profit off of this stuff.
	Well, you know, they have shortchanged us, that's for sure.
	And that'd be a fair response to short their stocks.
	It created a lot of misery for a lot of people, and it was the cybersecurity thing that actually did it.
	So we're seeing this over and over again, the structures that are there to protect us.
	And again, as you and I talk about, the incredible fragility of our infrastructure and how the more complex it gets, the more fragile it becomes, and the more vulnerable it becomes to somebody who is malicious.
	But with that complexity, and then with DEI... The whole thing, everybody needs to start shorting the infrastructure, and by that I mean going out and prepping for yourself and making sure that you're going to be okay if this house of cards falls down because of 15 characters.
	That's really what we're looking at right here.
	Well, that gentleman you had on yesterday with his civil defense books, I don't know him.
	I've never read them, but I think they would be a pretty good investment.
	I'm thinking about...
	I mean, I've got my basis coverage somewhat well, but...
	I'm going to make an investment in getting some of his books.
	Yeah, yeah. CivilDefenseManual.com.
	That's Jack Lawson. He's had a wealth of experience as a mercenary soldier and in the military.
	And then he knows people in special forces, and so he had them talk about their areas of responsibility.
	So, yeah, you can look at that.
	And he's got a free chapter there about water, because that's the principal thing.
	You can't go long without water.
	And we've got all of our water systems are now being hacked left and right all over the place as well.
	They can mess up the delivery. They can mess up the water itself in these systems. So as everything goes online, as everything becomes more and more complicated, it gets more and more vulnerable. And I guess that's the key takeaway and for people to prepare for themselves.
	Well, thank you so much for joining us.
	Thank you.
	Sorry, go ahead. Okay, and you tell Jack he owes me a cup of coffee from promoting his book.
	Okay, I'll do that.
	Yeah, thank you for coming on.
	Thank you for doing a Saturday with me.
	It's important to get this stuff out, and people need to start paying attention to this.
	This is going to be a really wild ride, I think, between now and the election.
	And I don't think things are going to slow down after the election.
	I think that's going to continue to escalate as we come to a close on this fourth turning.
	We've got another four years of it, and I think we're going to have a lot of crazy things that are going to be happening.
	And it isn't really from our perspective.
	You know, we can look at it, is it malicious or is it incompetence?
	But either way, you've got to prepare for when this stuff goes down.
	So thank you for joining us, Goatree, and explaining this stuff.
	Appreciate it. My pleasure,
	David. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
	This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
	Break free from the usual script with The David Knight Show, a fresh perspective bringing you genuine insights on current events.
	But if the show is going to stay on the air, we'll need your continued support.
	Sharing the show, subscribing, and even just hitting the like button all help.
	And if you found our show helpful, Please consider donating and becoming a part of a community that values the truth.

▲