Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 17, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:35

The David Knight Show - 06/17/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	You
	Using free speech to free minds.
	You're listening to The David Night Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday the 17th of June, year of our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to begin by taking a look at the bump stock issue.
	A slight bump for freedom, as Trump's gun control by executive order has now finally been overturned.
	We're also going to take a look at the attack on the First Amendment, the Ministry of Love, I guess we should call it.
	You know, of course, the Ministry of Truth.
	Was the propaganda, but maybe censorship is more of a law enforcement issue, like the Ministry of Love.
	We can't have anyone saying anything that could be deemed to be hateful, can we?
	And so that's the basis for this.
	And we have now not just the germ games from Dark Winter onto Event 201, but now we find out that they're doing food games as well.
	I guess we could call them hunger games, if the other ones are germ games.
	We'll talk about who's doing that, who stands to benefit from it, and of course the Pentagon has a public-private partnership with the people to produce cancer meats.
	We'll be right back.
	Well as Babylon B says, all the bump stocks that were lost in boating accidents back in 2017 have miraculously washed up on the shore.
	Actually, they got the date wrong.
	The bump stock bans did not begin in 2017.
	It was predicated on a shooting event.
	In 2017.
	That was the basis for which we did this new approach, gun control by fiat, by executive order, that Trump was so proud of.
	But yeah, they've all just suddenly turned up again.
	One of the most remarkable miracles in human history, thousands of bump stocks that went missing seven years ago.
	And boating accidents all simultaneously washed ashore and have been reunited with their owners.
	And let's not forget that this also includes the pistol braces.
	So I guess they have washed ashore as well.
	But nobody wants to attribute this to Trump.
	Isn't it interesting? Actually, the only people that will attribute this to Trump Are news organizations like NBC, hoping that perhaps some of the conservatives will realize how he betrayed them and betrayed the Second Amendment.
	But you won't see this on conservative media.
	For example, here was the article and headline on Breitbart.
	Take a look at that. Supreme Court declares ATF ban on bump stocks illegal.
	So it says ATF, and it's got a picture of Biden.
	Yeah. And Biden responds with a call for gun control.
	No, actually, Breitbart, it was Trump who did that.
	Isn't that amazing? They won't tell you the truth about Trump, because if they did, they'd instantly be labeled as a Trump-hater by people like Laura Loomer and Tim Pool and other people like that, and the MAGA people would start to boycott them.
	You must not tell the truth about what Trump did in his first term.
	That's why I call him Benedict Donald, because he betrayed the principles of the conservatives who supported him.
	And he betrayed the Constitution that he took an oath to as well.
	The people who will tell you the truth are the mainstream media in this particular case.
	Supreme Court rules the ban on bump stocks is unlawful.
	The ban was imposed by the Trump administration.
	After the accessory was used in a 2017 mass shooting in Vegas.
	You know, I find it very interesting that the right really doesn't know or care about what's going on.
	Or maybe, like in the case of Epoch Times, maybe it's not just sloppy reporting.
	Maybe there is some kind of accidental, intentional reporting about this when they mix the dates up and talk about it as being all Biden.
	Babylon B says 2017.
	No, it was actually 2018.
	I remember it very well.
	And then in 2019, what happened?
	Well, Trump did it again.
	That was his second one.
	That was his executive order to get rid of pistol braces.
	And that stayed there from 2019 until the term between the election and the transition period there where he was fighting the election results.
	And at that point, at that point, he removed the pistol brace stuff, which was then quickly put back in in the spring of 2021, which is what Biden did.
	And of course we knew that was what the Democrats were going to do.
	It was a gift to them.
	In the same way that he handed off the baton with the vaccine and all the rest of this stuff, he handed off the baton with the gun control.
	And I gotta say, this Vegas shooting was one of the phoniest things that I have ever, ever seen.
	But they don't want to tell the Trump base.
	Nobody wants to tell them. That Trump betrayed the Constitution.
	When the Epoch Times looks at it, they say that all this stuff happened in 2020 and that Biden did it in 2020.
	Well, Biden wasn't in the White House in 2020.
	Newsflash, Epoch Times.
	Epic failure. As a matter of fact, as I played for you before, he was bragging about how he was going to do bump stocks, and he could do that all by himself.
	This is an event...
	Listen to this. Trump is using your God-given rights protected specifically under the Constitution.
	He's using them as political bargaining chips with the Democrats in this meeting.
	And I will call whoever you want me to, if I like what you're doing, and I think I like what you're doing already.
	I don't like what you're doing. You can add to it.
	But you have to be very, very powerful on background checks.
	Don't be shy. Very strong on mentally ill.
	You have to be very, very strong on that.
	And don't worry about bump stock.
	We're getting rid of it. I mean, you don't have to complicate the bill by adding another two paragraphs.
	We're getting rid of it. I'll do that myself.
	Yeah, I'll do it myself. Fortunately, we're able to do that without going through Congress.
	So, if the four of you could work together and come up with some beautiful foundation, add and subtract to it, put it for a vote, let's get it done.
	That's what we have to do.
	Yeah, let's get rid of the Second Amendment.
	Come on, let's just do it. Well, see, that's the problem.
	And we'll talk about the issue of whether that should be done through Congress, whether it can be done through Congress.
	And he not only said, well, let's just do it again, you know, like a thug, like a mobster, like a casino owner.
	Yeah, yeah, I can do that.
	Yeah, I can do that myself. We don't need to mess this stuff up.
	I can do all that stuff myself.
	I got the power to do it, you know.
	As we come together to recognize these brave Americans, I know all of us here today and across the entire nation are grieving for the community of Parkland in the great state of Florida.
	We're working very hard to make sense of these events.
	On Saturday, I met with some of the survivors and their families, and I was moved, greatly moved, greatly moved.
	Spoken like a New York Democrat, which is what you are.
	And heartbroken for the families whose loved ones were so cruelly torn.
	From them forever, forever and ever.
	And what happened to the police officer with a gun?
	What did he do? We can pledge the strength of our resolve.
	And we must do more to protect our children.
	We have to do more to protect our children.
	I directed Attorney General to clarify whether certain bump stock devices like the one used in Las Vegas are illegal under current law.
	And just a few moments ago, I signed a memorandum directing the Attorney General to propose regulations to ban all devices that turn illegal weapons into machine guns.
	I expect that these critical regulations will be finalized, Jeff, very soon.
	The key in all of these efforts, as I said in my remarks the day after the shooting, is that we cannot merely take actions that make us feel like we are making a difference.
	That's exactly what you are doing.
	You virtue-signaling whore.
	It makes me disgusted to see people like this.
	But of course, that's exactly who Trump is.
	He's a New York Democrat.
	He's not interested in anything except his own political winning.
	And he will throw anything and everything of yours under the bus.
	He'll throw every principle of the Constitution under the bus.
	So how did this get overturned?
	Well, I actually know Mike Cargill.
	He's a great guy.
	He's got a gun shop in Austin.
	And he stuck on this and took it to the Supreme Court and he won.
	Breaking news. I did it.
	Michael Cargill versus Merrick Garland, the Department of Justice, I called tobacco and firearms, the bump stock lawsuit.
	I beat them in the United States Supreme Court.
	I was told over five years ago, why are you going down this road?
	No one cares about bump stocks.
	Let's go ahead and let them take the bump stock.
	But instead, I stood and fought.
	And because of this, the bump stock case is going to be the case that saves everything.
	It's going to stop the ATF from coming after their brace, the triggers, all different parts and pieces that they're trying to ban.
	And I'm glad I stood up and fought.
	So now we have a case that is case law that we can move forward around this country and defend our Second Amendment rights.
	As always, more guns equals less crime.
	You go out there and you buy yourself a gun.
	Better yet, get yourself a bump stop.
	Yeah, and get it from Central Texas Gunworks if you can.
	He's a great guy, Michael Cargill.
	He ran for a local office in Austin.
	Unfortunately, I couldn't vote for him where I was.
	But he understood exactly what was needed there.
	I mean, he was focused on things like, well, you know, why do we have these...
	Why has I-35 been turned into a parking lot?
	Because these people are so focused on their communal transportation that they won't build any roads, and they don't understand.
	And the one thing that they're talking about doing is east and west when the traffic problems are north and south.
	I mean, he was a level-headed guy, and he fought this and won it.
	It should inspire everybody. And he's exactly right.
	Because what was bad about the bump stock?
	See, the NRA didn't care about the bump stock.
	They gave Trump a pass.
	Seriously? The NRA couldn't see the precedent that was being set by President Trump?
	That was the key thing.
	Everybody else could see it.
	Yeah, gun owners of America was pushing back on it.
	But Michael Cargill saw it.
	I saw it. Everybody else looked at it and said, well, okay, we're going to do now, instead of infringing on the Constitution with congressional legislation, we'll now just do it by executive order and by the deep state, the ATF, doing whatever they wish, just changing the rules. We'll have regulation without representation.
	And that's just fine, isn't it?
	It's fine with the NRA. No, it's not.
	And so, good for him.
	But, you know, it's just amazing to me that the alternative right will not talk about what Trump did with both the bump stock, but also the pistol brace, the fact that he set that precedent.
	As soon as he did that in 2018, I said, you watch what's going to happen.
	I said... You're going to have the Democrats jumping on this.
	And of course, right away, Lala Harris says, well, when I'm president, I'm going to give Congress 100 days to get rid of all guns, and if they don't do it, I'll start doing it by executive order.
	She immediately jumped on it.
	Immediately jumped on it.
	And of course, Biden acted on it when he became president as well.
	You know, when you look at Trump and their negotiating and using our God-given rights...
	As bargaining, political bargaining chips.
	This makes me want to throw up.
	This makes me want to throw up.
	Anyway, so NBC reports.
	By the way, it's not just Breitbart.
	Many, many, many conservative organizations.
	They all leave out Trump.
	They'll put in the ATF. That's what Infowars did.
	It's what all of the alternatives.
	Breitbart, I thought, probably had the worst one because they put Biden's picture up there.
	It wasn't Biden. He continued on with the precedents that Trump did, which is exactly this professional wrestling tag team match stuff that was going on with the pandemic and the vaccines and all the rest of the stuff.
	But NBC says the Trump administration Imposed the prohibition.
	After the Vegas mass shooting in 2017, Trump personally called for the accessory to be banned.
	He bragged about how, I can do that.
	We don't have to go through any legal procedures.
	We just do it by fiat.
	And then we had to push back from Sotomayor.
	It was a 6-3 decision.
	And she pushed back on it and she said, well, when I see a bird that walks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, I call that bird a duck.
	Well, when I see tyranny...
	That doesn't care about the Constitution.
	You're not going to duck responsibility.
	I'm not going to duck responsibility for Trump either.
	So, here's a question, okay?
	She says, well, this, when she talks about it, it's like a duck.
	What she means is it's like a machine gun, right?
	It seems like a machine gun.
	It works like a machine gun.
	All this kind of stuff. Well, here's a big question nobody's asking.
	I'll ask it. Why should a machine gun be banned?
	Where's the constitutional authority for banning machine guns?
	There is none. When they put up the come and take it flag in Texas, what was on the flag?
	It was a cannon, right?
	They came for the cannons in Concord and Lexington, not just the muskets.
	And Santa Ana came for the cannon in Goliad.
	These were all military weapons.
	And the purpose of the military weapon was to protect this.
	The Second Amendment is not about hunting.
	It's not about sports shooting.
	I know, you know, the bump stock thing is something people do, evidently for fun.
	People will go places and rent machine guns to fire them.
	Maybe that's fun.
	I don't know. I've never done it.
	To me, it's just too expensive.
	If you look at the price of ammunition...
	Why would you want to blow through that much ammunition all at one go?
	I guess there's a certain thing to it, but that's not what I'm into.
	But, you know, it is weapons and guns and cannons and that type of thing are tools of the militia.
	And the way I read the Second Amendment, the Congress should not only not infringe on the rights of the people, of the people, To keep and bear arms.
	But it should also train them and equip them, right?
	They should be giving us this stuff for free.
	They shouldn't be banning machine guns.
	They ought to give them to us for free.
	Is that crazy? You think that's crazy?
	What do they do in Switzerland? Yeah, they get government machine guns issued to them.
	Because they use their people as a militia.
	So anyway, more than a dozen states, however, have already banned the bump stocks, these constitution-free zones that we call places like Connecticut.
	Congress could also act, they say.
	Biden has said that he used every tool in my administration to stamp out gun violence.
	Guns are not violent.
	Did you know that?
	People are violent. People can use anything.
	They can use a hammer. They can use a car.
	They can use an SUV to run people down at a Christmas parade.
	People are violent.
	Guns are a tool. And guns are a tool to defend people from violent people as well.
	And you can use a gun to defend yourself against somebody with a gun.
	It's even better to defend yourself with a gun against somebody who doesn't have a gun.
	They've got a big butcher knife or a machete or something like that.
	It's like... Raiders of the Lost Ark all over again.
	Look, prohibition doesn't work in Europe.
	It doesn't work in the UK. Drug prohibition never worked.
	Alcohol prohibition never worked.
	It always makes things worse.
	It always corrupts the police.
	It corrupts the courts.
	It destroys the rule of law.
	It never stops what it was meant to prohibit.
	And you always wind up with a more concentrated form of what it is that you're trying to prohibit.
	Like crack cocaine. Or like fentanyl.
	You always wind up with a more concentrated form.
	What are we going to get? And of course, with alcohol prohibition, people went from beer and wine to hard whiskey.
	Because that's what the bootleggers could make the most money on.
	And they will go back and talk about the National Firearms Act of 1934 and other things like that because they had created gangs from alcohol prohibition.
	Gangs that were shooting each other in the streets with machine guns.
	And it's just another example of the failure of prohibition.
	So, NBC says gun control advocates decried the ruling and raised concern that some of the state law bans could be struck down as well.
	Yeah, because, see, the states, as a condition of office, all the people in the state have to take an oath to the Constitution, an oath to the idea that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
	That's the reason why.
	We've seen bump stocks cause immense destruction and violence, said the director at the Giffords Law Firm.
	No, you haven't, actually. You've been told that that's what happened in Vegas.
	But the reality is that if you listen to some of the tapes, and here's, I think, the best video I've seen to illustrate this, that Vegas shooting was not a bump stock.
	The Vegas shooting was one of the most questionable of all shootings that I've seen.
	I've seen a lot of them. It's up there with Aurora, Colorado, which happened, I believe, the Aurora, Colorado shooting.
	And this guy who went from, you know, National Merit Scholarship and all this kind of stuff, a really bright guy, to essentially, his brain was fried.
	You know, I don't know what I'm doing.
	I think my apartment is wired and all this other kind of stuff, okay?
	And that happened...
	Just about a week before, the UN was trying to do the UN Arms Trade Treaty to regulate firearms in the United States under the idea that they had to trace them if they got across the border.
	And that was something that had been pushed for a long time by both Republican George W. Bush and And also by Obama.
	It was the gun-walking thing that turned into the Fast and Furious issue.
	Blew up when a federal agent got killed as part of this false flag operation.
	Even the New York Times said it was a false flag operation.
	So that whole thing got exposed.
	And they needed to be able to pull this back.
	And so, conveniently, there was this really, really strange Aurora, Colorado shooting one week before the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty.
	And I focused on that quite a bit because I was there covering it for a gun organization.
	We're doing videos and interviews of people who were speaking there at the UN. And it had already been set up, and then we had that thing happen.
	And then as I looked at it, I was like, oh, this is a setup if ever I saw one.
	And the same thing is true of Vegas.
	Same thing is true. So let's take a look at a video.
	And this is a video that if you're listening on audio...
	You can hear the difference. This is what we're really looking at here is the sound of somebody shooting a bump stock and the sound of somebody shooting a specific machine gun.
	And the rate of fire is the key thing that you're going to be listening to.
	So Vegas was not a bump stock event, folks.
	There's Las Vegas shooting. Rate of fire.
	600 RPM. This is bump stock.
	Here, that's faster. Back to Vegas.
	Hear it? Different sound.
	Different speed. There's what you were hearing right there.
	Belt-fed machine gun.
	Back to Vegas.
	600 RPM. It's a good bit lower rate of fire.
	Here's the video and the audio.
	You can see how they line up. Look at that.
	Exactly the same rate of fire.
	Exactly the same sound.
	And there's more that can be said about it.
	Multiple shooters and other things like that.
	The Vegas shooting was incredibly suspicious as well.
	And then I had, that happened on a Sunday.
	My show had only been going about a couple of months.
	I began in August, and so that was in October.
	It wasn't even a full two months, I think.
	And so Steve Pachinik wanted to come on, and I had never interviewed Steve Pachinik.
	He came on, and he came on, well, I'd interviewed him once.
	I interviewed him once about hurricanes in Florida, where he was setting it out.
	And so he wanted to come on and talk about that.
	He was supposed to come on and do two segments.
	He missed the first segment, came on the last segment, and tried to sandbag me to say that nobody died in Vegas.
	And I'd been covering that at that point in time.
	That was a Thursday. I'd been covering it since Sunday.
	I had talked to people who were there, and I said, no, I don't believe that at all.
	I knew exactly what that POS was doing.
	He was trying to entrap me with a nobody-died lie, just like he entrapped Alex with Sandy Hook.
	And he's the one who did it.
	And I wasn't going to stand for that at all, and I knew it was a lie.
	And so, from the very beginning, everything about Vegas, this narrative about a bump stock, statements from people who were there saying there were multiple shooters, it was coming from multiple directions, what you see happening there in the hotel, and then Steve Pachenik was just the icing confirmation, let me know, this is coming from the deep state.
	And of course, this is all channeled then to Donald Trump.
	Donald Trump, who then uses this phony thing to establish a precedent of gun control by executive order.
	So, as NBC is saying...
	In a concurring opinion, conservative Justice Samuel Alito conceded that in practical terms, a weapon equipped with a bump stock is very similar to a machine gun and said Congress should act to ban the accessory.
	Congress should act. The horrible shooting spree in Vegas showed how a semi-automatic rifle equipped with a bump stock can have the same lethal effect as a machine gun, said Alito.
	Well, again, he's going with the official narrative, which is absolute nonsense.
	And he's saying, you should pass a law in Congress.
	Well, that is not as bad as what Trump and Biden were trying to do.
	They were trying to do regulation without representation to destroy the Second Amendment.
	You see, this is not just a piece of legislation.
	This is about something that is expressly prohibited in the Constitution.
	If they've got a problem, if Alito's got a problem with the Constitution, if Trump's got a problem with the Constitution, if Biden or Schumer have a problem with the Constitution, they need to amend the Constitution.
	Otherwise, you obey it or you lose your authority.
	Because you hold your office as a condition of your pledge to uphold the Constitution as the supreme law of the land.
	There is no congressional law and there is no Supreme Court decision that amends the Constitution.
	There is a process for amending the Constitution.
	You can't just ignore it and pass gun control laws, but they've been doing that for nearly a century now.
	You go back and look at the 1934 Firearms Act, which is what they want to talk about here.
	And when you look at the lies that centered around that, it was...
	After they passed the 1934 National Firearms Act, banning certain things like sawed-off shotguns and machine guns and things like that.
	Not necessarily banning machine guns, but saying that you have to get a special permit for it, make it expensive.
	But the sawed-off shotgun, that was a trial that came in 1939, five years later, to help to establish, you know, it was on shaky ground, like most of the stuff that FDR did.
	He came after the Constitution.
	Most people were not calling him on it.
	And it was ripe for a challenge.
	So what they did was they had a convicted felon.
	His name was Miller. And they said that he had a sawed-off shotgun.
	And as they went through the process, unfortunately for them, Miller died.
	It should have been a moot case, right?
	What happened this last week with the abortion pill thing?
	Well, Kavanaugh said, and it was a unanimous decision, and he was right.
	He said, you have no standing as doctors to challenge this abortion pill because you're not selling it, you're not providing it, you don't have any contact with it whatsoever.
	You're just a doctor, but you don't have any direct connection with this.
	And so, you know, didn't have any standing.
	Well, they didn't have any standing and it was a moot case because Miller died, but they went ahead and took it to the Supreme Court anyway.
	And they decided and they ruled that they could, that the sawed-off shotgun was not a military weapon.
	Now, isn't that strange? Don't we have it the other way around?
	Isn't it Biden who's always saying we've got to ban these things because they look like military weapons?
	Well, they said, well, if it's not a military weapon, if it hasn't been used by the military, then it's not covered under the First Amendment because that's weapons for the militia.
	That also is a lie because sawed-off shotguns have been used in trench warfare in World War I. They've also been used going back to the Civil War and cavalry charges.
	All of that was a lie.
	That was a rigged process and a rigged Supreme Court to push this thing through.
	They had already decided what they were going to do, and it didn't matter if they had a dead man at the center of the case or not.
	They ran it through. This kind of corruption, this kind of sea change that we see taking place in our society, very similar to what they did with the Federal Reserve Act.
	They'll ram this stuff through whether they have the authority to do it or not.
	So the National Rifle Association, as NBC correctly points out, initially backed President Trump's move to ban the bump stocks.
	Not only did they not, they weren't just neutral.
	They didn't say, well, yeah, that's not an important thing.
	I don't want to, you know, that's not a hill to die on type of thing.
	No, they backed him.
	They backed him.
	And that was the astonishing thing about it.
	For anybody that thinks, and of course I didn't.
	I've never been a member of the NRA. I will never be a member of the NRA. They don't stand any more for the Second Amendment than the ACLU stands for free speech and other things like that.
	They're a sham organization.
	They're there for power.
	There are good gun control organizations like Gun Owners of America, but NRA, they're just there to collect money.
	It's a corrupt organization.
	And so they backed Trump doing the bump stock thing.
	And then when he did the pistol brace, they said, oh, wait a minute.
	This is turning into a trend.
	Turning into a trend.
	Well, it did turn into a trend.
	And so the 1968 Gun Control Act, they also mentioned that.
	Another violation, by the way, the Second Amendment.
	Again, you cannot pass a congressional act and overrule the Constitution.
	You need to amend the Constitution if you don't like what it says.
	There's a process for doing that.
	They just ignore it and write their own laws because they know they don't have the votes to amend the Constitution.
	It's just like when they had alcohol prohibition.
	What did they do? They amended the Constitution, the 18th Amendment.
	They no longer pay any attention to the Constitution now, however.
	Because a bump stock still requires the trigger to be engaged for each shot, it is not a machine gun, they argued.
	Clarence Thomas writing that a firearm equipped with a bump stock does not become a machine gun because it cannot fire more than one shot with a single function of the trigger.
	ATF, therefore, exceeded its statutory authority by issuing a rule that classifies bump stocks as machine guns.
	Lower courts were divided over the issue.
	Both the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and the Cincinnati-based 6th Circuit ruling that the ban was unlawful.
	But they did get a support of Trump's ban in the most liberal D.C. Circuit Court.
	How about that?
	You know, I'm sure that this New York liberal is proud of the fact that he had the D.C. Circuit Court uphold that ban.
	But look, the real issue was the violation of the Constitution, not whether or not it was a machine gun.
	Machine guns should not be banned, first of all.
	Secondly, it was based upon a lie.
	It was based upon the arbitrary power that was being established by Trump and the ATF to do whatever they wished at any point in time without even congressional involvement in violating the Constitution.
	And so, again, here's another example of conservative headlines.
	The Epoch Times, Zero Hedge, Federal Judge Overrules the ATF's Pistol Brace Rule.
	You all know it was Trump who did that, and then it was Biden who did it.
	At a 12-page decision issued on June 13th, U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor ruled that the ATF's rule that treated roughly 99% of pistols fitted with braces as short-barreled rifles violated the Administrative Procedures Act's procedural requirements because it was not a logical outgrowth of the proposed version of the rule.
	So again, they're pulling back and saying this is arbitrary and capricious for two reasons.
	First, The defendants, the ATF, did not provide a detailed justification for the reversal of the agency's long-standing position.
	And second, the final rule's standards are impermissibly vague.
	The Second Amendment, however, is clear.
	Shall not infringe the rights of the people.
	The Firearms Policy Coalition said the ATF had lawlessly acted to turn millions of gun owners into felons.
	FPC members should be proud of what is accomplished today.
	We look forward to defending this case on appeal and up to the Supreme Court just as we have with other cases.
	Restrictions on stabilizing braces have been the subject of intense debate after the ATF proposed them in 2020, says Epoch Times.
	No, you got it wrong. Trump proposed them in 2019.
	And then what they do is they say, the next timeline that they have here in the Epoch Times, Epoch Errors, by the way, said in January 2023, the Department of Justice announced that it had submitted the final rule to the Federal Register, formalizing the regulation that President Joe Biden advocated for in April of 2020.
	Hey, Epoch, Biden wasn't president in April of 2020.
	It was April of 2021.
	And so what they did was they put an ATF proposal in 2020 in the first paragraph.
	Then they say that Biden did it in April of 2020.
	Now the reality is that Trump proposed it in 2019.
	And then Biden, and then he took it out in 2020, December of 2020.
	And then Biden put it back in in April of 2021.
	2021. After it was found that a man killed 10 people at a grocery store in Boulder, Colorado, using a gun with a stabilizing brace, they said.
	So the reality is, is that by conflating those dates, by removing Trump, the Epoch Times is lying to you again about Trump.
	I tell you what, I'm disgusted with this stuff.
	I am just disgusted with it.
	I don't understand how people, how conservatives, can countenance the memory-holing of Trump's record.
	He's got a record!
	Hold him to his record!
	I am so sick of these organizations like Epoch Times and Breitbart and WND and Infowars and the rest of these people who expunge his record.
	They're as bad as Google.
	They're just as biased.
	Tell the truth!
	It's not hard. And we know what the truth is.
	They make me sick.
	It's amazing. Short-barreled rifles are subject to more strict regulations under the National Firearms Act of 1934.
	Again, I talked about that Miller case.
	And by the way, the pistol brace, even though they're going to appeal it to the Supreme Court, The pistol brace has already been blocked in Tennessee.
	You can block it in your state, too.
	You see, you need to understand what the feds are doing.
	You need to understand what World Economic Forum is doing, what the UN is doing, and you need to block it with good legislators at the state level.
	When I talked to Senator Nicely, he said, that's already been done.
	He said, we saw this coming.
	We put together a bill and said, you can't commandeer, you can't enforce these laws if...
	Your laws conflict with our state laws.
	If you're trying to ban something that's legal in the state, you're not going to do it in Tennessee.
	And then they passed a bill and said pistol braces are legal in Tennessee.
	End of story. We're done.
	Now, it's great to go through and challenge this stuff in the court, but the way you're going to stop this is at the state level.
	That's why they want you focused on Trump and Biden.
	The two guys who are doing the pistol brace together.
	The two guys who both want to do the bump stock together.
	And again, all these people say, well, you better hope that Biden doesn't get it.
	What difference does it make to the existential issues that are before us, the constitutional issues?
	You're going to make the difference at the state level.
	More than 22,000 people were attending a country music festival in Vegas October 1st, 2017, so forth, you know.
	And that's NPR talking about it.
	At least they got the dates right.
	With support from Trump, the agency in 2018 ordered a ban on the devices, blah, blah, blah.
	So, again, you're worried about the deep state?
	Oh, Trump's going to take care of that, right?
	No, he's completely run by the deep state.
	Oh, it's a big difference between Trump and Biden, right?
	You saw that negotiating going on there about the Second Amendment with Trump.
	Do you think he's going to do the same thing with abortion?
	Yes, he will. He'll do the same thing with every issue that is important to you because nothing is important to him except himself.
	A deeply wounded narcissist incapable of acting except out of his own perceived self-interest or revenge.
	As his lawyer said.
	So, again, Michael Cargill's attorneys...
	He argued that the ATF overstepped its authority by banning bump stocks.
	The president of the organization that worked with him knew Civil Liberties Alliance, Mark Chenoweth, said that his group would not have sued if Congress had banned them by law.
	In other words, it was because of this establishment of a new way to do gun control by executive order and by the deep state, by the bureaucracy.
	That it was challenged, and that's exactly why it should have been challenged.
	Now, it should have still been challenged just as an infringement, but it was a particularly new and dangerous form of infringement, and it had to be challenged on that basis.
	Very important. So Biden is now saying that Congress needs to ban it.
	And again, that's what we have accepted for the last 100 years, the idea that That Congress can pass laws that are in conflict with the Constitution, and we don't care.
	But that's wrong. We should start complaining about that.
	I mean, I complain about it.
	Everybody should start complaining about it.
	And Chuck Schumer is going to be the one to bring it up.
	He called the ban common sense.
	See, Chuck Schumer's on the same page as Donald Trump.
	They both thought it was common sense.
	Oh, yeah, we can get rid of that.
	Absolutely can. We'll do whatever it takes to get rid of that.
	He said Americans should not have to live in fear of this mass devastation.
	Americans should not have to live in fear of their government.
	There are certain things in life that we can't do anything about. And if we're going to hand out SSRIs like candy to mentally disturbed kids, we'll talk about the First Amendment issues involved in the Trainee Killers Manifesto. They're now coming after the publisher there in Nashville, Tennessee Star. Today is a hearing and this local judge is saying, well, you have to show cause as to why I I don't lock you up for contempt because you leaked this information.
	Well, where's the law that says that it's illegal for a police officer to hand this to the press?
	Has this local new judge, and she looks like she's 20-something, has she ever, is she familiar with what happened with the Pentagon Papers, any of that stuff?
	Uh, nobody came after the Washington Post or the New York Times for that stuff.
	Uh, so, um, we're going to take a quick break, but I got a lot of comments here.
	Let me catch up on some of these. Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip.
	I appreciate that. Uh, by the way, we'll talk about tips coming up.
	Uh, Trump's got a plan for tips.
	Laughing about it. I said, well, now I've got a reason to vote for Trump, maybe.
	Uh, no, no.
	Laughing. Anyway, he says, you need an F-15 to fight a government.
	The Viet Cong and the Taliban proved that was a lie.
	That's absolutely right. It's called asymmetric warfare.
	And that's why we haven't won any of these wars.
	My son says, Biden says, well, now there's been ruled that the president can't violate the Constitution.
	I'm calling on Congress to do it.
	That's a good summary. Octo spook.
	Shall not be infringed.
	All uppercase. Yep. And yet still we tolerate insane arguments against the absolute, God-given, Constitution-guaranteed Second Amendment.
	Jason Barker. Hey, Jason.
	My pistol brace is 3D printed.
	And you can download the design at Thiniverse.
	Good, good. And Jason can give you...
	I've interviewed Jason, Knights of the Storm, Fox Hole Report.
	And he's done a lot of good information about 3D printing and about guns.
	He's an expert on that.
	OctoSpook. Trump issued over 200 executive orders, quote-unquote.
	Orders barely worth wiping your bum on.
	For the love of the road.
	Good to see you there. Remember the people making excuses for Trump when he said he'd get rid of bump stocks?
	I do. I worked for one of those people.
	Saying that he only did it to show how much the Democrats want to take our guns.
	You know, I was talking about that to Karen.
	I said, I started working just before Sandy Hook.
	Sandy Hook happened a few months after I got in.
	Only like about three or four months.
	And max.
	And I just saw somebody put up Alex Jones on Piers Morgan.
	Yelling and screaming about, you know, the Sandy Hook was what was the event that was there.
	And I remember Alex shutting down commercial breaks.
	This is too important. We're going to, you know, left and right.
	I mean, he was on fire about this attack on the Second Amendment.
	And look at how he just waved it all away.
	Don't tell me that Alex Jones didn't change over those ten years.
	Biggest transformation I've ever seen in anybody.
	I mean, it all became about money.
	It all became about fame, power, all the rest of this stuff.
	And he's willing to lie for all of that, whether you're talking about an attack on the Second Amendment that's so dear to him.
	I mean, this is a guy who dearly loves the guns, you know?
	I see him as a tool. I'm not in love with him.
	But, you know, he is.
	He's got machine guns and all the rest of this stuff.
	But he didn't.
	He just caved on that like everything else.
	Just like he caved on the vaccines.
	He told people for years about the adjuvants, about aluminum and mercury and other things like that.
	And then he has the audacity to say, don't worry about it.
	You know, Trump's going to put some of that stuff in there just so it looks like it's real.
	But it's sugar water. And he knew it was an mRNA.
	And he knew that the adjuvants were some of the worst stuff out there.
	Anyway, he knew the problems with vaccines.
	69, yay, sure, 69.
	All gun laws are unconstitutional, period.
	Yep. Stephen Kaspar, the NRA is useless.
	Yep, I agree. Owen, 61.
	You think your cannon will protect you against an F-15 or a nuclear weapon?
	You ain't thinking right, citizen.
	Yeah, it's, well, actually, I think that, you know, they can have the cannons and they can have the F-15s as long as we've got the asymmetrical warfare and a lot of people.
	But, of course, the reality is, you know, the concern is the heart of the people, right?
	Do the people have the heart to fight that?
	Are we the same people as the people who are fighting for Afghanistan?
	Would Americans take that?
	And I have serious doubts that they would.
	And I certainly don't want to see a civil war.
	And that's another difference that I have with the MAGA cult.
	Steve Bannon, Alex Jones, all these people out there, these boasting idiots.
	They're just as stupid as that...
	What was the name of that guy?
	Firebrand in South Carolina that got the first shot at Fort Sumter.
	Yeah, that idiot.
	He wound up blowing his head off when the Civil War ended.
	Committed suicide. Edmund Ruffin.
	You know, Alex Jones and Steve Bannon and Trump and all the rest of these people are the spirit of Edmund Ruffin.
	I think it was Edmund.
	Edward. Edmund.
	I don't know. Anyway.
	M sellers don't care how practical the bump stock is.
	I just want the freedom to choose one should I so desire.
	Exactly. None of the government's business.
	Especially under the Constitution.
	Jason Barker, the NFA never banned machine guns and short barreled guns.
	It just applied a tax which the gangsters could afford.
	It just made ownership prohibitively expensive for the everyday Joe.
	Well, see, that's it. I... I know that there was a tax for the machine guns.
	Maybe I'm wrong, but I thought that it outright banned short-barreled guns.
	I didn't think that there was any way that you could get permission for it.
	Maybe I just had that impression because of the way they set up Randy Weaver with that.
	It just made ownership prohibitively expensive for the everyday Joe.
	It placed a huge divide between criminals and the general public because the criminals can afford it.
	You don't think that.
	Al Capone and these other guys could afford the taxes for a machine gun.
	Of course, they didn't pay taxes, and that's what really got them in the end.
	It wasn't Elliot Ness.
	It wasn't any of the stuff.
	It was the IRS accountant who took him down.
	Stephen Caspar. Vegas was a scam, like COVID. I 100% agree.
	But I do think the people died there.
	And that was really...
	Really dangerous lie from Steve Pachenik and a deliberate lie, just as he repeated the sting after the election, two days after the election.
	GreenQueer99, Todd Callender showed that many elected officials have no valid oath of office.
	Yeah, well, that's true.
	And, of course, when they disobey it, it's not valid anyway.
	Dougalug. A neighbor has a bump stock.
	I hear his rate of fire change when he is shooting.
	Yeah. And it's different than what was recorded in Vegas, too, as we just showed here.
	Stealth Patriot. All the old movie reel news feeds at the time were really focused on the FBI against the mob.
	That propaganda back then led the public to accept it as a blatant violation of the Second Amendment.
	Edgar Hoover was a master, a master showman.
	It's like P.T. Barnum.
	He could create, you know, that was what got him in with the FBI. It's what kept him, of course, blackmail also kept him in.
	But, you know, he did TV shows and all the rest of this stuff, and the G-Man and all the rest.
	I mean, he had an incredible PR campaign unmatched until Fauci, and the two of them career bureaucrats.
	Octospook, a short-barreled shotgun, is an excellent home protection weapon and can be wielded effectively in tight spaces, hallways, etc., Unfortunately, the criminal government employees embedded in American government do not want you to have effective short shotguns.
	That's right. And again, a military weapon as well as any kind of firearm like that is covered under the Second Amendment.
	Jason Barker. SBS and SBRs are about concealability.
	Short-barreled. I don't see people in trench coats anymore, so it's a stupid rule.
	And the SBR is the basis for pistol brace ban.
	It just makes a pistol into an SBR-ish rifle, which is not illegal, just taxed.
	The only time I've seen anybody recently in a trench coat was Karen at Bilderberg.
	We're going there. I was there with Josh Owens and Karen was there.
	And we were told to try to get into the hotel where we'd had reservations and they'd been canceled.
	And so we were walking down the street and Karen was on the other side trying to be nonchalant.
	She had a trench coat. And the three of us were the only people on the street.
	It was the most ludicrous thing I've ever said.
	But nobody stopped us, and we walked right up to the hotel, walked into the lobby, did our live stream report and all this other kind of stuff as we got thrown out, and we subsequently found out that they knew we were coming in, but there was another crew that was there, and they saw those guys and thought they were us and arrested them, and so that allowed us, while they were busy with them, that allowed us to go do it.
	They didn't know that there was another crew.
	They thought it was just us, so...
	Yeah, trench coat games.
	Michelle Obama, being repressed by a government designed to protect our freedoms makes about as much sense as an inoculation that kills you.
	That's right. Guard Goldsmith, good to see you, Guard.
	All the picky nonsense from the judges on what's a machine gun is infuriating.
	That's exactly right.
	That's not the issue.
	And it wasn't the issue as to why this organization took the case for Cargill.
	You know, it was yet an easier way for them to violate the constitution.
	I said, machine guns are part of the right to keep and bear arms as well.
	Even Clarence Thomas got on the, got distracted by this other thing, right?
	He says, angry.
	Yeah, that's right.
	He says, thankfully the MRC editor guard Goldsmith says, didn't remove my reference to Trump and the article I wrote on this.
	Good. He said, the 1934 Firearms Act was the tax.
	Then they expanded in 68 to non-tax bans.
	The ATF was created to collect the tax.
	Yeah. They used to call them revenuers.
	Alcohol, the alcohol part of it, when they were here in the hills.
	Yeah, good points, Guard.
	Thank you so much. We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	The Common Man.
	The common man.
	The Common Man. They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com TheDavidKnightShow.com I want to thank some of the people who sent us contributions by mail that I did not thank.
	Stacey P., Minor M., Aaron W., Felicia M., Carol and Betty, and Paul H. Thank you so much for the contributions.
	And this note, this is from a listener who said, I was hospitalized and I knew to refuse remdesivir.
	But did you know that they have a different name for it now to disguise it?
	Vecleri. V-E-C-L-E-R-I. Yeah, poison by any other name, right?
	This is the thing that's difficult, too, because, you know, they always have at least two names for drugs, and sometimes there's many more, because sometimes another drug company will license, you know, the drug underneath it, and then put their own label on it, you know, just like we have Roundup, Which is the name for glyphosate, but other people can sell it under different names as well.
	This is also sent to me from a listener, Michigan Farm News.
	And of course, you know, there's pictures on here of, you know, John Deere tractor and everything.
	And the listener says, here we are.
	Here's bear looking out for the farmers, as usual.
	Yeah. And they're talking about the big lawsuits.
	Again, Bayer bought Monsanto for something like $60 billion, and that came with a string of lawsuits attached to it.
	And this Michigan Farm News story says, with nearly $11 billion paid and 100,000 Roundup lawsuit settlements thus far...
	In an estimated 54,000 lawsuits still pending, Bayer has gone on the offensive, defending the safety of glyphosate.
	It has now worked its way in almost every aspect of our food supply.
	And it has also been shown to be deleterious.
	And so, what are they defending this on?
	What is the basis for this?
	Well, according to Bayer, they're spending billions of dollars for this.
	This is money that could have been invested into research and development programs.
	Investment is essential to solving some of the world's most important problems, benefiting both farmers and society, and it's being squandered in a courtroom.
	They wouldn't have kept it as profits.
	No, they would have come up with all new ways to, you know, do food, that type of thing.
	Food prices are already high.
	And without advanced agricultural products, farm meals will go down, farm land will be degraded, farmers' costs will go up, and food prices will rise even more dramatically.
	You know, and then they quote the WHO, said, The only group to categorize glyphosate as a possible carcinogen is an affiliate of the World Health Organization.
	And so, again, you should support Bayer because they're anti-WHO, they said.
	Well, you're going to find these things from time to time.
	But look, you want to talk about affordability of food?
	Talk about the poor farmers in India who committed suicide because of glyphosate.
	You said they bring this stuff in and they poison their soil so that nothing will grow except for the genetically modified seeds that Bayer sells them, Bayer or Monsanto.
	So they give you the weed control and then they sell you the seed, the only seed that will grow in that poisoned soil.
	And then you find out that they raise the price on that stuff, and you don't have any way that you can grow anything else.
	And so it destroyed the life of a lot of farmers in India.
	They were so driven to such despair that they committed suicide.
	But yeah, we know exactly what this is about.
	You talk about monopoly-seeking.
	That's the whole business model of glyphosate.
	Poison the soil so that you've got to buy the seeds from me.
	That's why when I did that report about Atlas Shrugged as part of that contest, about 15 years ago, I picked the date 2030 because that was what was already being talked about at that time.
	And I said, you know, well, things got out of control.
	Look at this. They killed all of our food.
	Well, that is actually more deliberate, and we'll talk about that when we get to the Hunger Games.
	But before we do, I was just talking about the Second Amendment attacks, and I want to talk about the First Amendment attacks.
	And so we have here, as I said at the beginning of the program, You know, when we look at Orwell's 1984, the Ministry of Truth is putting propaganda out there.
	But, of course, there's two aspects of it.
	You've got to censor and shut down the people that would debate what you're going to put out there.
	In other words, if you want to put your propaganda out there, these obvious lies are not going to work unless you can shut down all critical thought and debate.
	And that's being done by the Ministry of Love.
	That was the police in Orwell, the police state.
	And they operate, they say, in the name of love.
	Stop in the name of love before you break my heart.
	And that's, I guess, going to be upheld by the other Supremes as well.
	But it's done to preserve people's feelings.
	Nobody can have their feelings hurt, especially the government.
	When it is something that is dear to the heart of the government, you must shut up about it.
	And that's really what's going on with this.
	Yeah, he says, wasn't the Ministry of Truth?
	The Ministry of Truth was propaganda.
	The Ministry of Love was law enforcement.
	And I think those two have to go together.
	I think the propaganda and the censorship have to go together.
	And they're doing the censorship in the name of love.
	And so we've got the Nashville journalist is now facing jail time over the trans school shooter manifesto leak.
	Now, I didn't cover this.
	There really, you know, it was some salacious details and some crazy stuff, but we all knew that she was crazy.
	There were some additional details that were interesting, such as the fact that she had been under psychiatric care since she was six years old.
	There at the Nashville, at the Vanderbilt Psychiatric Center.
	So if you want to raise a crazy killer, take them at the age of six to some university psychology department and let them have their way and put them on drugs and all the rest of this stuff.
	And so there was a lot of that that was involved.
	They don't want people talking about that.
	They don't want people getting concerns about big pharmaceutical companies and the SSRI stuff and the antidepressants and other things like that.
	And they don't want people pushing back against their religion of choice, LGBT, especially in Pride Month.
	And so the Tennessee Star in Nashville had some leaked papers, 48 papers that were leaked to them.
	And they published them. And now they're being called into court today to say, well, explain to me why you shouldn't be locked up for contempt.
	This is spiraled into a contentious legal battle which could see a journalist tossed into jail if he doesn't reveal his source.
	Again, this is classic attack on the free press.
	The judge, the county judge who newly minted, I don't know just how long, but they referred her as a freshman judge, showed a picture of her.
	Her name is Chancellor Laisha Miles.
	Now somebody has really pretentious expectations for her when they gave her the first name of Chancellor.
	But she is ruling like a little dictator there.
	She ordered Michael Patrick Leahy, editor and owner of the conservative website, the Tennessee Star, to appear in court.
	Leahy is to participate in a show cause hearing today.
	To address why he should not be held in contempt over his publication of leaked documents.
	And again, what does that mean, leaked documents?
	Were these things put under a national security seal?
	This is the thing that really bothers me, and I came across this over and over again.
	you would go somewhere to talk to, I remember going to the Austin Airport, they're bringing in a new kind of security machine and it was reported that they had this contract and they're bringing them in so I just want to go down there and talk to them, you know, get some information about why they're doing it and things like that, why they're changing their security procedures. Nobody would talk to me and it wasn't just because, you know, the justification they did.
	I know that it was not about national security.
	It was about job security.
	Why would they want to talk to me?
	Nothing good could come out of it for them, right?
	They might say something that was a juicy sound bite, and then it's really bad.
	But this is the way that government works at every level.
	We're talking about local government or whether you're talking about anything in the federal government.
	It's always everything is treated as national security.
	You have a right to know nothing.
	Transparency to the public for what the government is doing is an antiquated idea that they have nothing but contempt for.
	They will not tell you anything.
	And always act as if it is secret and secure and Classified document.
	This is the stuff that all came in after World War II or the Cold War and everything.
	Everything now, everybody thinks they're part of the CIA or something.
	And so that's what they're talking about here, even when they talk about it being a leak.
	Is it a leak when you were handed some information from a police officer?
	The police officer may have an issue with the police department.
	You shouldn't have handed him that stuff.
	But he didn't break in and steal anything.
	And that's really the issue that's there.
	When you look at the Pentagon Papers, right?
	They came after...
	Daniel Ellsberg, because he had the papers.
	Now, again, there's all these questions as to whether or not they wanted this stuff leaked.
	I'm not even going to, you know, but put that aside, okay?
	The straight-up story, the bare facts without any side agendas by the CIA or the rest of the stuff, is that a guy got his hands on it, and he stole it, and he handed it over to the Washington Post and the New York Times.
	And even as...
	They do movies about it with Meryl Streep and Tom Hanks.
	I think it's called The Post.
	Breaking their arms, patting themselves on the back for being so courageous and publishing what Daniel Ellsberg did.
	And the court found that, no, they had not violated the law.
	The person who had violated the law was Daniel Ellsberg.
	And then they let him off on a technicality.
	But whatever.
	The bottom line is that the person who steals it has culpability.
	And they would do nothing at all.
	To defend Julian Assange, who was in that same position.
	Now, of course, the American government takes the position that Julian Assange helped to steal this stuff.
	It was known that he wanted this, and so he was culpable for it.
	Now, it was known that the press wanted this, and it was known that the Tennessee Star wanted the manifesto.
	They had actually filed suit to get it, like a FOIA suit, Freedom of Information Act lawsuit.
	And so it was known.
	Uh, should he be locked up like Julian Assange?
	Is this the new rules that we operate under?
	I don't think so, but we'll see what she does.
	So, um, he's facing jail time unless he gives up his source at a hearing, except that the court of appeals, I tried that immediately his lawyer said, well, um, you know, this is, um, sent a letter to the judge saying, uh, This is wrong, and if you're going to pursue with this, I'm going to immediately file in the Court of Appeals.
	But the Court of Appeals is too busy to hear it.
	As they say in this article, too busy handling slip and fall cases.
	Instead, this is the last opinion of the week, a routine slip and fall at a hotel.
	So they're not going to hear this very important freedom of the press issue.
	They're going to hear a routine slip and fall thing rather than say, hang on with that.
	We've got something here where a journalist is about to get jailed by a judge for reporting.
	On Friday, a Nashville police lieutenant delivered a court declaration suggesting that former Lieutenant Garrett Davidson was the source of the leaks.
	It raises profound questions about the motivations behind and the repercussions of leaking sensitive information from an active police investigation.
	Stop right there. This has been one of the things that we can't tell you anything about it because it's an active police investigation.
	No. No, it's not.
	The perp is dead.
	There is absolutely nothing.
	There's not going to be any murder trial.
	You're not going to contaminate the jury.
	You know, are they going to have a jury trial for this dead person?
	Your Honor, we, the jury, find the defendant dead.
	There's nothing at all there.
	Yeah, as my son says, I'm pretty sure they know who did it.
	Yeah, that's right. They know who did it.
	There's not going to be any trial.
	There is no active police investigation.
	The only thing that's active with the police...
	It's to hide this information.
	And that's because the FBI is telling them to hide the information.
	Why is the FBI telling them to hide the information?
	To protect the crazy trannies.
	You know, when I cover this or these other things, I always, I usually show Norman Bates.
	They'll see. I'm as harmless as a fly.
	I'm just a little old lady now and all the rest of this stuff.
	It's crazy.
	But it's not an active police investigation.
	It's an active police cover-up.
	Legal experts argue that while the public's right to know is paramount, the integrity of judicial proceedings must also be safeguarded to ensure fair and impartial justice.
	There will be no trial.
	The defendant is dead.
	Interesting, isn't it? What they did with Miller?
	You know, we got an ongoing court case here.
	Don't talk about what happened.
	He's dead, of course, but, you know, this is weekend at the Supreme Court with Bernie.
	It's bring him in and prop him up in the chair.
	This is insane.
	They're about to jail a brilliant journalist, Michael Playae.
	For obtaining a copy of the Transgender Covenant Killers Manifesto when the feds were trying to block the public from seeing it.
	That's Mike Benz commenting on this.
	Well, Deborah Fisher has a comment and a timeline about all this.
	And she said, Note that it is not clear to this writer how someone leaking, quote-unquote, leaking these documents was, quote-unquote, illegal.
	Which is what the judge is saying.
	You leaked it. It's illegal to leak it.
	She said the district attorney has not sought to prosecute anybody for leaking.
	The police don't appear to have pressed any charges either.
	I know of no statute that makes releasing this type of record illegal, although certainly theft of police records could be illegal.
	But what if you, in this case...
	Take pictures of police records.
	Would that be theft?
	This is not a violation, folks, of the National Secrets Act.
	And again, there's going to be no trial.
	No defendant is having their rights compromised by this.
	This is just a flat-out cover-up by the FBI. I am uncertain that Chancellor Miles, again, Chancellor is not the title, that's her first name, the judge.
	I'm uncertain that Chancellor Miles has the authority to issue an order to prevent the police department from releasing its own documents.
	And I don't recall an order to this effect anyway.
	Can she order the police department not to release documents?
	But she didn't. It would seem like a bad idea allowing a judge to prevent another branch of government from releasing its own records that it wants to release.
	But again, the central thing is that there isn't any investigation.
	There isn't any trial that's going to be held.
	This is being held.
	There's an embargo on this.
	And as a matter of fact, the FBI told the police department to destroy these things before this gets out.
	The Tennessee Star begins publishing stories using information from an interview on June 4th with former police lieutenant Davidson.
	Unnamed sources in the shooter's writings found in her car.
	The FBI suggested that the Metro Police could destroy the shooter's writings to prevent the public from ever seeing them.
	A psychologist who treated the shooter, Audrey Hale, tried to get her involuntarily committed at the Vanderbilt Psychiatric Hospital after Hale expressed violent fantasies.
	Hale had been planning the attack for a very long time and thought that she could have been discovered.
	And Hale had been treated over the course of 22 years by Vanderbilt Psychiatric.
	Now, that's not a very good ad for their track record, is it?
	She was 28, and they treated her for 22 years.
	And again, like I said before, you want to get somebody, you want to grow a crazy mass murder killer?
	Put them in psychiatric treatment from the time they're six years old and up.
	That'll mess them up. And then give him some drugs as well.
	So, on Monday, last Monday, Chancellor Miles, the judge, ordered Leahy to appear in his individual capacity against a lawyer, Daniel Horowitz, First Amendment lawyer in Nashville.
	He filed an emergency motion last Wednesday.
	For Miles to set aside the June 10th order for the show cause hearing, he said, with due respect to the court, this court's show cause order violates, and he cites the Tennessee Code, and it also violates Tennessee's Shield Law.
	It contravenes Tennessee's contempt law.
	It deprives Mr. Leahy of minimum due process guarantees, and it suffers from other serious constitutional infirmities.
	So he said that he was going to file it for an appeal court immediately.
	But he said that was it clear what order or what provision of the judge's orders this journalist had violated because the judge wasn't specific in setting the show cause hearing.
	It's a new young judge.
	I think it's really out of her depth.
	The orders appear to be about supplemental filings and declarations in court.
	How could Leahy defend himself if he didn't know what the court thought that he did wrong?
	Shouldn't even write a complete order.
	Horowitz also outlined for the judge the protections in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that provide for press freedom and prohibit prior restraint by government.
	And that would include courts and judges.
	On publishing material.
	If the judge thought her order prohibited Leahy from publishing, that would be prior restraint and unconstitutional.
	Horowitz said he would file an emergency appeal to the Court of Appeals if she did not vacate the show cause hearing order by noon Thursday.
	He did that, but again, as I said, they've got a slip and fall case so they can't hear it.
	It's just, when you look at this, since...
	Since there is no defendant, since there is no murder trial, what in the world is this judge even there for?
	How does this all get before a judge anyway?
	Acting as if there's going to be some kind of a trial.
	We've got to keep this information private.
	Sometime after Horowitz files his appeal, maybe near the same time, Chancellor Miles issues a new order, refusing to rescind her order for the show cause hearing, and adding new information about what she wants at the hearing today.
	Then put in another order Thursday evening, saying that there will be no live testimony.
	Now, through attorneys and not live testimony, the Court of Appeals has not responded as of 11 a.m.
	to Leahy's motion.
	So we'll see what happens.
	It's about four dozen pages of the murderer's diary.
	The FBI expressed concern.
	This is what they said, why they don't want this out.
	Concern that the diary from a transgender person, a transgender killer, Could lead the public to dismiss the attacker as mentally ill, quote-unquote.
	Yeah, we wouldn't want anybody to think that she was crazy.
	Since when is any mass murderer not crazy?
	This is a problem I've always had with the insanity plea.
	You know, yeah, you're by default crazy if you're going to do something like this.
	Said it would further permeate, this is the FBI talking, quote, further permeate the false narrative that the majority of attackers are mentally ill.
	Oh, they are. They are mentally ill.
	And they're on SSRI drugs, which they don't want people to look at either, you see.
	The FBI worried that releasing the diary could have unintended consequences for the segment of the population more vulnerable...
	Or open to conspiracy theories.
	You see, the FBI is just a ministry of love.
	They just love transgender people.
	And they don't want their reputation sullied by the fact that one of them did this.
	They have to pretend that that never happens with them.
	Now, you know, if we have some, you know, Protestant or Catholic that molests a child or something, well, front-page news about that.
	But let's not talk about a mass murder of a tranny.
	People could get the wrong idea.
	She was also on the anti-anxiety drug Buspirone, I guess.
	Potential side effects include abnormal dreams, outbursts of anger, tremors, and physical weakness.
	The FBI worries that the diary will create a link in people's minds between mass murders and mental illness.
	Here's the link that they're worried about, folks.
	They're worried about the link to Big Pharma.
	And it may be more about protecting Big Pharma.
	That it is about the transgender stuff.
	But I think both of those are very strong motivations.
	Either one of them would be enough for the FBI to keep this secret.
	Crime Prevention Research Center Says that 51% of mass public shooters in the last 25 years were actually seeing mental health care professionals before their attacks.
	And that's two and a half times the rate of the general public.
	And guess what they do when they see these professionals?
	The professionals load them up with antidepressants and other things that are going to mess them up even further.
	So this person that the FBI is trying to protect killed three nine-year-old children, shot them point blank, and three adults, a 61-year-old, two 61-year-olds, and a 60-year-old.
	She was killed 14 minutes later by the police.
	The press openly attempted to present the mass shooting as a case of a persecuted LGBT person being pushed too far by Christians.
	See, they had it coming, according to the press.
	Daily Mail. Nashville mass shooter was rejected by her Christian parents.
	It's their fault.
	Not the SSRI drugs.
	It's not the school that did this stuff to her.
	It's not her. Nobody's responsible except for the Christian parents.
	NBC News. Fear pervades Tennessee's community amid focus on Nashville shooters' gender identity.
	Well, they're not talking about the Tennessee community of everybody.
	They're talking about the LGBT community.
	You know, these people who dress up in all these crazy clothes and think that they're another gender and everything.
	We might think they're crazy and dangerous.
	The Associated Press said the head of the Christian elementary school in Nashville who was killed in the shooting there on Monday was described by friends as smart, loving, and a rare female leader within a male-led religious culture.
	See? It's that male hetero patriarchy thing.
	That's the real issue.
	And we can't let people see the tranny diary because then they would know that it is not about the male hierarchy.
	It's not about Christianity.
	It's not about the Christian parents.
	Former Christian school student kills three children, three staff in the Nashville shooting said Reuters.
	So again, driven to it, Not by SSRIs, not by mind-altering drugs from the pharmaceutical people, not by indoctrination in the schools driven to it by Christians.
	These writings reveal an angry young woman who was furious at her Christian parents.
	They loved her dearly, and she still lived with them at age 28 at the time of the shooting.
	She was upset that puberty blockers were not available when she was a child.
	She was upset about a lot of stuff.
	As I said, I read some of the reports that were put out by the Tennessee Star in her diary.
	She's talking about the fact that she had gone to art school, and she'd gotten a degree.
	Remember when we went through a couple weeks ago, and I said, look at these different degrees here.
	You look at the present value of them.
	Are you going to get back more than you put into this thing?
	You're investing money, time, into your college education.
	Is that invested tuition, is it going to pay back?
	And, of course, at the top of the return on investment were things like engineering.
	But then there were some of these things that had a negative present value, a negative expected return.
	And the worst of all of them, Was an art major.
	That's what she chose.
	And then she wrote in her diary that she had attempted four or five times in the preceding year to get a degree as working in art.
	And she didn't get a job or she got the job and they fired her or whatever.
	So that's it.
	My life is over. My life is over.
	That was another aspect of it.
	So, her papers give a glimpse into a disturbed mind.
	She fantasized about being able to have sex with a woman in her male-chosen fantasy identity.
	She writes that the use of her male name in a job application had caused problems with a background check.
	Said that being raised as a girl was, quote, torture.
	She didn't learn about transgenderism until she was in her 20s, and she embraced it immediately.
	She said, I hate parental views.
	How my mom sees me as a daughter and she did not bear to want to lose that daughter because a son would be the death of Audrey.
	She also wrote about stimulating sexual scenes between or simulating between male dolls and stuffed toys and took photos, writing, I'm such a pervert.
	I waste too much time in my fantasies.
	Furry land, I guess.
	Hale's journal entries, frequently referred to her, quote, manifesto, unquote, were recovered by police from her car outside the school after she was killed.
	Although the chief of police stated that they would be released eventually, the FBI came in and advised against their publication.
	The families of Audrey Hill's victims launched a public records lawsuit stating that they should have a right to determine whether the writing should be released.
	And I imagine that's where this judge who calls herself Chancellor, I guess that's where she got involved in it.
	After a trans-identifying killer shot three adults and three little children, the press, law enforcement, and LGBT groups responded by colluding to keep the truth from the public.
	And to present Audrey Hale as a victim of Christians.
	Thanks to a courageous whistleblower in the police and to a courageous journalist who is now going to be made to answer for acting in the free press.
	We now have this information.
	And it's not just there where they're trying to cover things up.
	In Connecticut, the Connecticut Bar Association has warned lawyers that they better not be critical of these Trump political prosecutions.
	Look, I don't like Trump, but it's very clear that these are rigged kangaroo courts.
	But if you were to say that, the Connecticut Bar is now saying, well, we might disbar you for your criticism of government.
	Yeah. This is everywhere.
	Everywhere. This week, I've received emails from Connecticut bar members, writes Jonathan Turley, warning them about criticizing the prosecutions of former President Trump.
	It says, chilling for lawyers who view cases like the one in Manhattan as raw political prosecution.
	Now, if that's not true, then defend it.
	Right? Right? I just have absolutely, and you should have absolutely, no tolerance for censorship.
	If it's a truth, you let it out.
	And if it's a lie, you let it be debated.
	That's the best way to destroy this stuff.
	If it's a lie and you try to cover it up, you make that lie look real.
	While the letter does not outright state that such criticism will be considered to be unethical conduct, it states that the criticism has, quote, no place.
	And the public discourse, really.
	So this is a club, you know, the Bar Association of the Club, and you ain't in it, right?
	A club where thou shalt not criticize the pet projects of the government.
	Where does that end? Well, it doesn't end.
	And we have seen that with 2020 and many other things.
	The statement begins by warning members that, quote, words matter, unquote.
	But then it leaves the ramifications for bar members dangling on how it might matter to them.
	They simply note that some comments will be viewed as, quote, crossing the line from criticism to dangerous rhetoric, unquote.
	Time to bring in the ministry of love and crack some heads open, right?
	Again, it's not enough to have propaganda.
	You've got to shut down anybody that disagrees publicly with what you're saying with that propaganda.
	That's where the law enforcement, the ministry of love comes down to get rid of all that bad hate speech.
	For example, criticizing Judge Juan Merchant for refusing to recuse himself from the case is considered to be beyond the pale.
	Many lawyers believe that his political contributions to Biden and his daughter's major role as a Democratic fundraiser and activist should have prompted him to remove himself and to remove any appearance of a conflict.
	Yet the Bar is warning lawyers that such comments can cross the line.
	The letter assures members that they are free to criticize but warn that attacking the ethics of a judge...
	Or the motivations behind these cases is dangerous.
	Dangerous to your career.
	I believe the verdict in New York may ultimately be overturned.
	I also noted that I do not blame the jury, but rather the judge and the prosecutors for an unfounded and unfair trial.
	For those lawyers who view such prosecutions as political, they are speaking out in defense of what they believe is the essence of blind justice in America.
	What is reckless to the Connecticut bar is righteous to others.
	Notably, the bar officials in Connecticut did not write to denounce attacks on figures like Bill Barr or claims that the Justice Department was rigging justice during the Trump years.
	No, their threats are also political.
	And one-sided.
	The letter only reinforced the view of a legal system that is maintaining a political orthodoxy and an agenda.
	They warn lawyers not to sow distrust in the public for the courts where it does not belong.
	Yet many believe that there is an alarming threat to our legal system and that distrust is warranted in regards to the prosecutions like the one in Manhattan.
	Let me just say, this has been going on, as I've said all along, so many of these problems for little people, and you're only seeing a very mild version of it for Trump, and the right goes crazy.
	They ignored it when it happened, and Jonathan Turley ignores it when it happens to other people, but they go nuts when it happens to Donald Trump, don't they?
	I've seen one person after the other railroaded when the government has an interest in a particular case or where they're friends with a big powerful corporation somebody's blowing the whistle on.
	I have seen them railroad one trial after the other, but boy, you would think this is the first time we've ever had a failure in the justice system.
	You think it's the first time we ever got a politicized thing.
	Where were these people in 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023?
	Where were they? When this is happening to people in the name of public health and other issues like that.
	He said, our legal system has nothing to fear from criticism.
	Indeed, free speech strengthens our system by exposing divisions and encouraging dialogue.
	Well, again, criticism is hate speech if the government disagrees with what you have to say.
	And they will send the thugs from the Ministry of Love in to handle That hateful speech.
	Here's another example.
	The Anti-Semitism Awareness Act that was put in by Machiavelli and Mike.
	This is Freethought Project, Common Dreams, and the writer of this is Jewish.
	He says this is a real danger to the First Amendment.
	It is. All hate speech is a danger to the First Amendment.
	Hate speech like that was put in by DeSantis and the Republican, the entire Republican Party in Florida, to pander for political contributions in Israel, because he went to Israel to sign it.
	There's absolutely no way that there should ever be any such thing as a hate crime.
	No way there should ever be a hate crime because that makes a crime out of people's motivations that you can't judge.
	You might take a look at somebody's motivations and make that a factor in a court case based on something that can be objectively determined.
	You might try to make evidence about their subjective state of mind.
	But to try to put somebody's motives and biases and unconscious biases and to say this is hateful or not hateful, that should not be a crime.
	If it is a crime, you will have no free speech.
	This bill could be used to crush legitimate debate about Israel and its policies.
	Are you starting to see a pattern here?
	You know, wherever we go, those in power declare that if you oppose their agenda, if you oppose their power, well, that's dangerous.
	We can't have that. That's hateful.
	That's got to be banned.
	You've got to be locked up.
	Because they're the ministry of love.
	They don't want any hate anywhere.
	The dangerous bill was already passed by the House of Representatives and now awaits a Senate vote, this Anti-Semitism Awareness Act.
	It outsources some of our constitutional rights to an outside organization, the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance.
	Their arbitrary definition of anti-Semitism poses a threat to civil liberties.
	It could be used to crush legitimate debate about Israel, about Israel's policies, and about American policies toward Israel.
	It could also suppress historical research.
	It could ban the mentioning of facts.
	That have been verified by international organizations.
	And just substitute for Israel.
	Substitute vaccine.
	Substitute the climate.
	Substitute the bird flu.
	Substitute the PCR, right?
	Anything that the government doesn't want you to talk about.
	That's where we are today.
	So this writer says, the federal government spends more than $100 billion per year on education.
	Including $85 billion for kindergarten through high school.
	See, this is the problem. This Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, of course, is being applied now to colleges.
	And the underlying problem is the bribery that is being funded by the Department of Education.
	$100 billion per year in education.
	$85 billion in kindergarten.
	$25 billion in federal student and assistance.
	And another $1.3 billion in congressional earmarks for colleges.
	All these expenditures could be used as leverage to stifle legitimate debate.
	Everything that the government spends is used as leverage.
	I had a listener who sent me an email and said, you know, look at this amount of money that Elon Musk got, you know, $54, $56 billion or something.
	He got it in just one compensation package.
	He said, do you realize that FDR and these guys, their New Deal thing, he said, was $50 billion?
	I didn't fact check that to see if that's correct, but let's just go with his figures there.
	Well... The reality is that, of course, the Fed has devalued our currency significantly.
	So that $50 billion, if that is an accurate case, it would be a little bit over a trillion dollars today.
	But again, we spend a trillion dollars every three months now.
	A trillion dollars that we don't have.
	You know, we're increasing the deficit by a trillion dollars.
	It is so out of control.
	All of the spending, and of course, most of the spending is used as bribery.
	So they can then blackmail you and say that we are going to withdraw that if you don't do what we say.
	That's how they get around the Tenth Amendment.
	Despite its anti-Semitic branding, this bill targets Jews as well as non-Jews.
	As literature professor Benjamin Balthazar writes, it would effectively ban the teaching of, quote, much Jewish history and culture, unquote.
	Balthazar observes that Albert Einstein, Ed Asner, countless other Jews would now be considered to be anti-Semitic under the new law.
	The bill defines criticism of Israel as a violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
	That means that non-Jews Could take action against anti-apartheid Jews, including deeply religious Jews who object to Israel's existence on theological grounds, ultra-Orthodox.
	They object to the existence of the secular government of Israel on theological grounds.
	They said, yeah, God's going to give us the land, but it will do it miraculously.
	This is a political thing, and they're stopping us from exercising our religion, just as other people have issues with that.
	And so you can have a situation where you can have ultra-Orthodox Jews who object to the political entity known as Israel, and they could be sued under this law by Zionist Christians like John Hagee, In San Antonio.
	Now, this is a guy, mega church down in San Antonio.
	He invites political officials, like ambassadors and stuff like that, from the nation of Israel.
	When he comes into this church, they're waving Israeli flags and all this other kind of stuff.
	It's like, what are they worshiping?
	You know, again, this is like a MAGA rally, except a different idol to worship.
	But they're not worshipping Christ in this Christian church of John Hagee.
	He's all about Israel.
	He's all about Zionism. He could bring these actions against ultra-Orthodox Jews who are anti-Zionist.
	This is a horrible piece of legislation.
	Brought to you by Machiavelli and Mike Johnson.
	One of the worst speakers I've ever seen, because this guy is so smooth, so clever.
	He's not seen as somebody who is corrupted, like John Boehner.
	You know, John Boehner has become his mentor.
	John Boehner has held fundraising events for him and that type of thing.
	John Boehner, who said, I'm unalterably opposed to legalizing marijuana.
	Then he leaves Congress as a speaker, and he goes as a spokesperson for marijuana organization.
	He said about Mike Johnson, he goes, yeah, he's pretty cool for somebody who's so uptight.
	He doesn't like to drink and do all this other kind of stuff.
	John Boehner is kind of a partier guy.
	But all that stuff just makes Machiavelli and Mike more dangerous.
	Because he gives the appearance of being straight up when he defies his oath to the Constitution, to the First Amendment.
	So, five forbidden statements under this.
	Number one, you can't say that Gaza is a concentration camp.
	I guess you can't say that it's an open-air prison or a smart city or any of that kind of stuff.
	This sentence runs afoul of a provision that would outlaw drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of Nazis.
	And yet, as this writer points out, concentration camps weren't invented by the Nazis.
	The Oxford Reference Dictionary says originally it was a place where non-combatants were accommodated, as instituted by Lord Kitchener during the Second Boer War.
	Now, that was at the end of the 1800s, but we called them Indian reservations before that.
	Same thing, I've said that all along.
	The Indian reservations are a precursor to the smart cities and other things like that.
	And really a form of concentration camp.
	The United States also built concentration camps to inter Japanese-American civilians during the Second World War.
	People who had done nothing to oppose the U.S. government, their only crime was having Japanese blood or being Japanese and living in America for some time.
	They were immediately locked up just for that.
	Number two, you're not allowed to say the creation of Israel involved considerations of race and ethnicity.
	Even though Israel has granted special rights to members of one ethnic group since its creation, wherever they may live in the world, while denying some of those same rights to the people who were already in their territory when it was created.
	But you're not allowed to say that.
	Number three, the right of self-determination.
	Because if you say that in a university, you get your funds cut, you see.
	But we're not that far away from the outright prohibition, and I'll show you that coming up here in just a second.
	Number three, the right of self-determination doesn't or shouldn't permit the displacement of local populations in favor of people who currently live elsewhere.
	That statement is prohibited.
	Number four, you can't disagree that Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East.
	You get in trouble by challenging a claim about Israel that it is the only democracy in the Middle East.
	And number five that you're not allowed to say is that Israel is conducting a genocidal campaign in Gaza.
	Now, if you say any of that, they will punish you with financial issues.
	They'll punish the college.
	And so they're going to set up like hall monitors to examine people's speech.
	Isn't that amazing?
	Isn't that amazing? And so, in conclusion, this writer says, every year at Passover, Jews repeat the prayer next year in Jerusalem.
	He said, when we studied this in Hebrew school, he's Jewish, It seemed clear to some of us that the return to Jerusalem was meant to come with the appearance of the Messiah, not through a political declaration.
	But those of us who raised this question were waved off.
	Today, many of the world's most traditional Jews hold the belief that the state of Israel violates Scripture.
	They, too, could be considered to be anti-Semitic under this law.
	These absurdities highlight the bill's real purpose, which is the state suppression of certain speech.
	The Anti-Semitism Awareness Act doesn't do much to address real anti-Semitism.
	It is designed to stifle and not to promote awareness.
	What you need to be aware of is the text of the First Amendment.
	Congress shall pass no law.
	Abridging freedom of speech.
	Never seen a clearer violation of the Constitution than done by the GOP. I mean, it was a bipartisan, past bipartisan, but it was led by the GOP, and pretty much everybody in the GOP voted for it, except for Thomas Massey.
	And it was pushed by Mike Johnson.
	That's what you have to expect from a Republican-led Congress.
	There is going to be nothing to cheer about come Election Day.
	You're either going to have Mike Johnson or you're going to have this guy, Hakeem Jeffries, running the House after Election Day, depending on which one gets the most votes, Republicans or Democrats.
	Hakeem Jeffries, Demands the immediate passage of the Countering Anti-Semitism Act, which is being pushed by the Anti-Defamation League.
	Another bill. Another bill.
	But this is broader than just the universities.
	This dangerous explosion of anti-Semitic incidents in New York City and the nation requires decisive action at every level of government, said Hakeem Jeffries.
	Without referencing any specific incident, he said, we have to crush this cancer with the fierce urgency of now.
	Congress must pass the bipartisan Countering Antisemitism Act immediately.
	This bill would create a new national coordinator to counter antisemitism within the executive office of the president to, among other things, counter the spread of antisemitism online and Including to impose accountability for individuals.
	So here's the law.
	You know, the Republicans, you know, Trump bans the bump stock and, of course, the pistol brace, but then pulls it back as he gets some opposition.
	Then Biden bans the pistol brace and Biden has other bans that he wants to put in as well.
	So Mike Johnson says, well, we're going to stop these universities from having, you know, any antisemitism.
	We're going to punish the university.
	Now here comes Hakeem Jeffries.
	Well, we're going to punish any anti-Semitism that we perceive from anybody.
	Anybody. And again, it begs the definition as to what is anti-Semitism.
	But if we're going to have a situation where somebody's feelings are hurt, then we're going to bring in the thugs with truncheons, the ministry of love, to stop the hate speech.
	There will be no First Amendment.
	The bill was introduced by a bipartisan pair of AIPAC-funded senators, Jackie Rosen, a Democrat, and James Lankford, a Republican.
	It was championed by the ADL for its provisions aimed at stripping Americans of their free speech rights.
	The Countering Anti-Semitism Act is the most far-reaching anti-Semitism initiative to be introduced in Congress, said ADL's CEO Jonathan Greenblatt.
	Back in April, he said, Well, it's only going to exacerbate things, as people will perceive the Jews as bent on removing our Constitution and our God-given rights.
	It'll require the National Coordinator, among other things, to conduct an annual analysis of online anti-Semitic content.
	So now they have a reason to catalog everything that you say about everything.
	To include Holocaust denial and distortion to prepare recommendations for Congress on how to counter the spread of anti-Semitism online requires the Department of Education to designate a senior official to advise and oversee the Department's efforts to counter anti-Semitism discrimination at colleges and universities.
	Of course, they've already done that with the other bill.
	And it will require FEMA to ensure they have sufficient resources and personnel to carry out the non-profit security grant program.
	Formerly designates May as Jewish American Heritage Month.
	So there we go. We're wondering what we're going to do with May since we've got Pride Month in June.
	Well, now we can have May as Jewish American Heritage Month because you're not going to have any American heritage.
	That's going to be stripped from you.
	Was George Orwell defending the left or was he defending the right?
	Or was he simply defending freedom?
	Everybody wants to claim him.
	As Rhoda Wilson quotes this article here, looking at George Orwell's life in Vogue, it said, For conservatives like myself, Ed West writes, When we see dictionaries changing the definition of a word literally overnight or the total distortion of history to suggest that it's always been so,
	When it is normal for people over 30 to be frightened of their own children because they are the greatest fanatics, we can't help but see the echoes of the 20th century totalitarianism in the modern progressive movement, even if it is a soft totalitarianism and doesn't come from the state, but from the media, from the academy, from education, and from tech companies.
	Yeah, totalitarianism is totalitarianism, regardless of where it comes from.
	The dystopia with which 1984 is most associated with, however, is Brave New World.
	Even if the two are awkward literary twins, their ideas of hell were polar opposites.
	For Orwell, pain would drive the new dystopia.
	For Huxley, it was pleasure.
	And I remember as people have debated this, you know, are we more like Brave New World or more like 1984?
	And I said, well, the vast majority of people, they try Brave New World on everybody.
	That's what's going on in our schools now.
	Try to sexualize the kids.
	Get them involved with drugs.
	Here, have some Ritalin, this and that.
	You know, get them hooked on drugs.
	Good. We've got different justifications for it.
	So, drugs and sex and, you know, just seeking your own pleasure, your own hedonism.
	If that doesn't work...
	And if people are still critical of the government, then they get the 1984 treatment of the truncheon.
	So it's both. It's not either, but it's both.
	Huxley's world state, as he called it, was a blatant dig.
	Yeah, my son says, Brave New World is a carrot, 1984 is a stick.
	That's right. Good cop, bad cop.
	Huxley called it the world state in his.
	They said that this was a dig at H.G. Wells because he loved the idea of a technocracy.
	The things to come.
	Kept in line, not by the truncheon, not by the whip, but by drugs, by hypnotism, by entertainment, by genetically engineered caste system that ran from the alpha plus elite down to the epsilon minus laborers.
	Orwell had fond memories of being taught by Huxley at Eton in 1918.
	I didn't realize that he had been a student of Huxley's while he was still just Eric Blair.
	He admired the book, but he was unconvinced of the tyranny of gratification.
	He said, there is no power hunger.
	There is no sadism.
	There is no hardness of any kind in Brave New World.
	He said, those of the top have no strong motive for staying at the top.
	And though everyone is happy in a vacuous way, life has become so pointless that it is difficult to believe that such a society could endure.
	Of course, this writer says, well, maybe that's because he never went to America.
	Huxley spent 26 years in California, so he knew that you could control people with drugs and pleasure and softness.
	Orwell had little interest in the United States.
	He didn't appreciate that pleasure could prove to be a greater drug than pain.
	And that's where we are.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to take a look at the renewed efforts and new programs to establish a global ID. Music.
	StSq3 3.30 (-0.99") StSq3 3.30 (-0.99")
	FCSp4 3.20 (-0.81)"
	StSq3 3.30 (-0.89")
	LSp4 2.70 (-0.66") Liberty, it's your move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	I've got some comments here that I didn't read.
	A Syrian girl says, every citizen of the U.S. has a right to know what is in the journal of a young woman who perpetrated mass murder on a school full of young, defenseless children and their teachers.
	And just, you look at the pictures of those young nine-year-old kids, how somebody could walk up, point blank, and shoot them in the face.
	I just don't understand that.
	What is the mindset of somebody like that?
	And again, it's the institutions that are producing people like that.
	Producing the drugs that produce people like that and so forth.
	Producing the narratives and the educational system like that.
	It's that institution that is trying to protect itself.
	They're not about protecting Americans at all.
	A Syrian girl says, it's amazing so few people are questioning the rights of a judge to hide the truth behind such a heinous crime.
	Yeah, I agree. As we were talking about, let's see, oh, and more.
	Octospook says, government criminals hiding their crimes under national security, unquote.
	Under investigation, unquote.
	And denial of free speech by journalists.
	That's what it is. Syrian girl.
	So this is the government narrative now.
	It's the Christian's fault.
	Gee, I wouldn't have seen that coming.
	Jason Barker says, if Christian persecution is reason for mass shootings, then why have we not seen it from the founding of the country?
	Good point, Jason. The mass shootings started when the pharmaceuticals came on the scene.
	Exactly right. Exactly right.
	Yeah, it started, I mean, you know, we've talked many times, even RFK Jr.
	said, hey, you know, when he was growing up, about the same age as I am, he said, when I was growing up, people were bringing their rifles with him to school, training in ROTC and things like that.
	It was a common thing for people who have gun racks in the back of their pickup trucks.
	Why didn't we have this?
	There's something else going on.
	That's why they don't want you to see the diary.
	Yeah. Giza Power Plant says, gender dysphoria still on the books as a mental disorder.
	Yeah. I wonder if you can still get a Section 8 out of the military.
	Did they change that after Michael Flynn started pushing transgenderism on SEALs?
	Jason Barker, I have a database of mass shootings going back to the 70s.
	It lists what medication they were on.
	Almost all were on antidepressants.
	Yeah, and that... That website that I mentioned from time to time, I've interviewed people from it twice.
	SSRIstories.net, I think.
	SSRIstories.net. They've got, I can't remember, 7,000, 9,000 different stories about SSRI and violent incidents where the people are not aware of what they're doing.
	A lot of that happens simply because somebody's having other physical issues with the medication and They reduce it or they cut it off and that triggers the incident right there when they change the medication suddenly.
	It's like the bends that a diver gets.
	If they suddenly change, if they've been down for a while and the nitrogen's dissolved in their blood and then they come up too quickly, it bubbles out, they get the bends.
	Same thing with this drug.
	If you've been on it, you can't get right off of it.
	You gotta gradually take this thing down.
	Sometimes people are having physical symptoms.
	The lady whose husband committed suicide, he was having trouble sleeping and the doctor gave him some SSRIs and she went on a business trip and he was, it had an incident or so where it felt like his skin was on fire and he tracked it down to the drug and she believes that he killed himself because he stopped taking the drug because it made him feel like he was on fire.
	Um...
	AP Rumble seat.
	Free speech is hate speech, according to the Ministry of Truth, which sounds suspiciously like something out of Nazi Germany.
	Look out for the brown shirts.
	Jason Barker. Sweet. I just checked, and my Wolfpack will be here today.
	It's like Christmas once a month.
	Yeah, that is cool, getting it.
	And I do think people who have, a couple people have put me on one of the lower Wolfpack things.
	I really do appreciate that.
	It is nice to get that.
	And by the way, you can get that at davidknight.gold.
	I should do a plug here for Tony.
	Wise Wolf Gold. Tony has set that up.
	You can get the Christmas once a month, and you can get discounts as part of a bulk purchasing group.
	It's got over 1,000 people who are doing it now, so it gets you a little bit better price.
	But you can buy gold or silver at wisewolf.gold.
	Large or small quantities.
	Or you can become part of Wolfpack and you can set yourself up on a regular program to save money.
	All of those are very important.
	And Tony has been a big supporter of this program from the very beginning.
	That is davidknight.gold will take you to wisewolf.gold and lets Tony know that you came through us.
	Octospook. Hate crimes or only hate crimes?
	If the hate is against special people.
	That's right. They're protected people.
	They're protected people that you're not allowed to say anything about.
	There should never be any categories like that.
	But they're special.
	They do. They call them a special class, a protected class, privileged class.
	Jason Barker says, Gates is pushing a book called Brave New Worlds.
	And he's got a link to this new one is about AI. I bet it is.
	Don't you just love it how these billionaires say, oh, this stuff I'm making is really dangerous, and they keep doing it.
	It's kind of like these gain-of-function labs.
	They're really dangerous, but we're going to keep doing it.
	Congress has hearings.
	Look at how dangerous these things are.
	They never even talk about cutting the funding to it.
	They never even talk about cutting these organizations that continued these experiments, even when they were told to stop.
	Never going to cut the NIH or the NIAID. How did we exist as a country without the NIH? How do we exist as a country without the larger HHS that's above it?
	How do we exist without the Department of Education or the Department of Energy or any of these unconstitutional organizations?
	The ATF, even.
	And so, yeah, let's talk a little bit about Global ID. The U.S. Department of Commerce, another agency for which there is no congressional authority, And if we look at this, and many times I've asked people, I said, okay, so when you look at the war on drugs, where is the authority for that?
	When we prohibited alcohol, they had to have a constitutional amendment.
	Why don't we have it for this?
	And the standard answer that I've gotten from people, even former law enforcement and former judges who oppose drug prohibition, they'll always come back and say, well, it's the Commerce Clause.
	I'm like, time out.
	The Commerce Clause was there when they passed the 18th Amendment to ban alcohol in the 20s.
	You already had the Commerce Clause there, so that doesn't give them any authority to do this.
	Does the Commerce Department?
	No, that doesn't give them any authority either.
	What has changed is not they have some newfound authority of commerce, but they have a newfound contempt for the Constitution.
	People went to a lot of trouble to pass the 18th Amendment to prohibit alcohol and then the 21st to make it legal again.
	They don't even care about the Constitution anymore.
	They don't even care to try to keep up appearances.
	So the U.S. Department of Commerce is now going to digitize the identities of all Americans who receive public benefits.
	This is what Bill Gates did in India with the Adhar system.
	He said, you've got to have an ID for everybody, right?
	You know, he's got his project ID 2020.
	We're going to, you know, push out a global ID starting in 2020.
	He's got pretty far along on that.
	And, of course, he's also got the IA 2030, the immunization agenda for 2030, whereby 2030, everyone, everywhere, every age vaccinated, presumably with every vaccine that they can think of.
	But what Gates did with India to get them to start on this Mark of the Beast system was to, with the Adhar system, they call it, if you want government benefits, if you want welfare, if you want health care, if you're poor, you're dependent on that, well, take a number.
	Take a number. And that's how they ran it through.
	So now our own federal government is doing that here through the Department of Commerce.
	The federal government has adopted a whole-of-government campaign.
	And when we talk about whole-of-government campaign, it's like what I showed with the CBDC campaign that Biden kicked off in March of 2022.
	And he said, I want all of government to report back to me, and you're going to report back and we'll tell you which of these government bureaucracies fall into which of these four categories.
	But every one of the government bureaucracies is going to have to issue a report within six months in one of these four areas.
	How are we going to completely redesign the financial system?
	How are we going to write the code?
	How are we going to enforce this?
	Using law enforcement to force people to use CBDC. And the fourth one was a propaganda campaign.
	Let's talk about how this is necessary to save the planet from CO2. And so whole of government meant that every one of these departments would have to come back and do a report in one of those areas at least.
	And so now they've got a whole-of-government campaign to force the adoption of a universal ID. Universal basic income, when it is adopted in the future, only the tagged and the bagged will be on the list.
	All the rest of the people can eat sawdust, says the editor of Technocracy News.
	Federal guidelines have already been secretly adopted for a digital ID program.
	They'll start off as voluntary, but only the most gullible Americans would believe that it's anything but temporary.
	The first group of citizens to be coercive into accepting a digital ID will be those who are receiving public benefits of one type or another, as it was in India.
	And they always like to incentivize this.
	As you remember, Governor DeWine, the Republican governor of Ohio, Get your jab.
	We'll put you in the hopper.
	You might win a million dollars.
	Or you might die. You know, whichever.
	You know, the kind of the Hunger Games.
	And then also blackmail people.
	Just like Jab Sinda Arden in New Zealand.
	Sounds to me like you're creating two classes of people.
	Vaccinated and unvaccinated. Yep, yep.
	That's what it is. Yep, yep. Isn't that great?
	I love it. I love the power.
	Yeah. Yep, yep. Well, you might be thinking that this is for poor people, that they won't be able to get food stamps or welfare or housing or something like that unless they take the ID. That's the way they did it in India.
	But guess what? This is also going to catch people who get veterans benefits.
	Oh yeah, you spend a lot of time in the military, and that was part of the compensation package that when you retire, you're going to get VA benefits.
	Well, not unless you get the ID. How about Social Security?
	You paid all those years in the Social Security?
	I told Karen, I said, I told you when we were in college.
	I said, I'll never see up any of this stuff.
	I said, it'll disappear before I get any of it.
	Well, now, if I got to have a digital ID to get Social Security, I guess I won't be getting that either.
	So, this is one thing.
	I'm going to pull it in for VA benefits, for Social Security, for anything.
	Any dealing with the government.
	It'll probably be the sort of thing, well, sorry, you can't get a driver's license unless you get your digital ID or this or that.
	They will use everything to browbeat and coerce people, just as we saw in 2020 and 2021 with Trump and Biden and all the rest of this.
	So, of course, the low-income welfare programs of every type will be a fair game for this, but it'll even include VA benefits and Social Security benefits.
	And it all begins with a little-known program at the U.S. Department of Commerce, that unconstitutional lying basis for the drug war and many other things.
	The Federal Commerce Department has an agency underneath it, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST. N-I-S-T. If you follow what's going on with 9-11, you know NIST. They were the ones who came up with a lying simulation that was debunked by the University of the Engineers in Alaska.
	They came up with a, you know, hand-waving, so this happens and then that happens and the music goes here and it goes around and around and it comes out over here.
	They came up with this explanation about how these buildings in 9-11 just collapsed in free fall.
	That NIST. They're going to be the ones to create the digital ID. Was that part of the deal back 20 years ago?
	That, hey, you play ball with us with this stuff and we'll cut you in on a nice little fiefdom here.
	The Commerce Department even has its own staffer whose sole responsibility is going to be to oversee the digitization of public benefits.
	The Undersecretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology and NIST Director Laurie Locasio.
	And so they're going to have a special little thing.
	Maybe they can get somebody like Sam Britton, you know, who doesn't know if he's a dog or a girl or what.
	To run it. You know, they had him in charge of nuclear waste.
	I'm sure they can find somebody like him or somebody like Rachel, so-called Rachel Levine, Dick Levine, as I call him, to push this.
	Biometric Update is the publication that ran an article about this, trade publication.
	Of course, you know, to be biometric.
	And again, what is the problem with biometric ID? Well, none of these databases are secure, right?
	And so when somebody breaks in and steals your biometric ID, you can't get a new one.
	Like you can get a new card or you can get a new password or something like that.
	No, that biometric identity, you got one of those.
	And once somebody grabs that, all bets are off.
	So that's part of the problem.
	There's a real technical issue.
	You know, that might actually be the Achilles heel that saves us.
	If somebody breaks into these biometric databases and spreads the stuff around, it could basically invalidate them.
	Just saying if there's any cyber hackers out there.
	I don't want to give you any ideas, but, you know.
	Human-centered solutions, that's a curious choice of words since these digitalization programs are all driven by AI. As a matter of fact...
	The article came out today from the Telegraph in the UK. They said all people who are going to be entering the UK will have artificial intelligence watching them as they're being interrogated and filling out forms, watching them for signs that they may be liars.
	How about that?
	The big liar, artificial intelligence, is going to be looking at us to accuse us of being liars.
	I guess it takes one to know one, right?
	Crazy. But, yeah, so they're going to be looking at your body language and other things to see if you are lying.
	Jason Barker says, the Commerce Clause is misinterpreted and misused.
	They use it to do a lot of things that it was never intended for and not actually able to do when in proper context.
	Yeah, absolutely. Like everything else, they completely perverted its use.
	Turn it upside down, inside out.
	You know, we look at FISA, for example.
	That was supposed to restrain the CIA and the NSA from spying on Americans.
	Instead, what they did was they used the FISA court to get a search warrant on Mr.
	and Mrs. Verizon and say, yeah, we can spy on anybody we want to now.
	So they use that to give themselves legal cover to do exactly what the FISA Act was set up in the first place to prohibit.
	Now, the Commerce Clause in the Constitution was to make sure we're going to have a free trade zone, essentially, within the United States borders.
	That you wouldn't have one state telling another state, sorry, we're going to put tariffs.
	If you send something from North Carolina to Tennessee, we're going to put a tax on it.
	No, you can't do that.
	And so the Commerce Clause was set up to facilitate free, unencumbered commerce.
	And yet, the way that it's been used is to encumber commerce everywhere.
	It's exactly the opposite.
	Jason Barker says, real ID is coming.
	It's already here. I've got one.
	I didn't know it when I got my driver's license.
	You know, they're just asking me about all this stuff.
	It's like, wow, sure, asking for a lot of paperwork and everything here.
	And so I provided the paperwork, and they got finished, and I said, see, now you've got a real ID. And it's like, I didn't want a real ID. Oh, well, you won't be able to fly starting in 2025, as I covered.
	You won't be able to fly in 2025 unless you've got a real ID. It's like, well, I'd rather not fly than have a real ID. The crazy thing about real ID is that it's about keeping you in.
	You won't be able to leave the country unless you have a real ID. No flying, no passport.
	Border-wide open for people coming in, but not for people going out.
	That's why, says Jason Barker, the wall is a dumb idea.
	A wall generally is to keep people inside an area.
	That's the way it worked in Berlin, isn't it?
	And that's why Rand Paul said in the very beginning, you better be careful about this wall.
	It can keep people in, as well as keeping people out.
	Sometimes it does a better job of keeping people in.
	Isn't it interesting that the very first thing that Trump did, and he, you know, and all these people, they stopped travel between different jurisdictions in 2020.
	Now, supposedly it was because we didn't want, you know, these contaminated people from other places coming in here.
	Yeah, right. No, it was so that they could control their own citizens everywhere.
	Didn't want everybody saying, well, we're going to flee this jurisdiction to another one.
	No, no, no. Keep them in there.
	You're going to deal with your own people.
	That's what I guess they were told when they went to Davos or to Bilderberg or wherever it was that the plan was distributed to them.
	Social insecurity says, don't frag me, bro.
	Yeah, that's exactly what it is.
	Yeah, social insecurity.
	Radice Bro says, how many times do I have to say it?
	It's not your career, it's the military's career.
	Yep, don't frag me, Bro says, bricks will be the ultimate CBDC and anyone that owes those combined nations' currency.
	We'll be compelled to adapt.
	Yeah, Russia's pushing pretty hard on the CBDC. I've got that news in the money stack here if we get to it.
	National Institute of Surveillance and Tracking is really a better definition of NIST. Don't brag me, bro.
	Michelle Obama says they'll just start stripping entitlement if people disagree.
	That's what they'll do. Jason Barker, David's nailing it right now.
	Well, thank you. They use all the benefits to push the ID. You'll also need the ID to file your taxes or you'll become a criminal.
	Yeah, you're right. That's it.
	Everywhere that you interact with them.
	And that'd be one thing, you know, unlike, I mean, you could even say, well, I'm not going to get a driver's license.
	I'm going to drive a car, whatever.
	I'm going to go Amish.
	I'm going to, you know, get a horse and buggy because I'm not...
	I don't need to get on a plane. I need a horse and buggy because I'm going to have everything around this community.
	Well, even there, got to file your taxes or you're not going to be allowed to do anything.
	Yeah, they're going to get us one way or the other with that stuff.
	It's going to be full-on war against anybody that doesn't take their number.
	Nancy Chambers, got my driver's license renewal and I'm supposed to get a new ID so I can travel or leave the state?
	Yeah, that's right.
	Freegun, what if somebody steals my eyeballs for retinal scanning?
	I've seen some science fiction films where that was actually a part of it, or they chop somebody's fingers off or their hand off or something like that.
	But of course, they're supposed to be able to see the blood flowing or something like that.
	And my son is saying, in real life, all they need is a high-res what?
	Okay, never mind.
	Okay. So, yeah, they're going to use AI to see if you're lying.
	Isn't that interesting? And the Gates Foundation is still involved in this.
	As I said before, he's been pushing this in India a long time ago.
	Pushed ID 2020, global IDs, and now $4 million grant to fund digital ID initiative.
	The scheme is known as the Digital Public Infrastructure, DPI. Not dots per inch, but digital public infrastructure.
	And it's being pushed by the World Economic Forum, by the Gates Foundation, but also by the U.S., the EU, and the UN. And now the U.K.-based AI and data science research group, the Alan Turing Institute, has become a recipient of a renewed grant, this time $4 million from the Gates Foundation.
	So what is he paying these scientists to do?
	It's initial funding of the Institute's initiative to ensure, quote, responsible implementation of ID services.
	So who are they responsible to?
	Are they responsible to government?
	No, there's no controlling legal authority here.
	Are they responsible to God?
	No. They think they are God.
	It's work that will be financed by the grant over the next three years.
	And so he's using his money to do all kinds of stuff.
	It's amazing, you know, when you look at the amount of power.
	Because so many people, if you pay them enough, they'll do anything.
	And so you've got people like Miriam Adelson, the widow of Sheldon Adelson.
	She can give Trump $100 million.
	She can get him to do a lot of things for her, for $100 million.
	And it's a pittance to them.
	Look at Bill Gates, who's got way more money than the Adelson family.
	Of course, Sheldon's dead, but he's got way more money than that.
	And, you know, $4 million, that's nothing.
	Yeah, that's probably less to him than it would be for you or I to eat out at lunch.
	Adobe, as I pointed out last week, forcing customers to accept a user agreement to access your content through both automated and manual methods.
	And this, coming back to this, because it's just so outrageous.
	To automatically scan and to keep records of users' personal projects.
	And then to use it to train their generative AI. AI. And on top of that, Adobe forces users to accept these new terms of service or paying customers can no longer access their programs and projects because Adobe stopped a long time ago selling their programs.
	They leased them to everybody to make more money.
	And so now you have to sign these new terms of agreement or the stuff that you even paid for for this month is going to be shut down.
	And when you look at this, They're going to use it to train their generative AI. In the most benign interpretation of what they're doing, they're going to steal your ideas.
	Plagiarism. Train their art program or whatever.
	But of course, in the less benevolent interpretation of what it is that they're doing, This is something that's going to be used as political persecution because, as I pointed out, Adobe is part of Microsoft's, you know, Bill Gates, Coalition for the Content, Providence, and Authentication.
	In other words, to identify everything that you produce.
	Whether it's a text document, whether it is a meme, whether it is an audio file, whether it is audio and video, all of it will be marked as created by you.
	Another way that they will use these IDs to do that.
	And then they will punish and censor you before you even get the stuff uploaded.
	Won't even let you create it if you are identified by the media companies that are part of this coalition.
	People like New York Times, BBC, others.
	And so that is a pervasive form of censorship that they are setting up that is going to be everywhere.
	And so what do you do about this?
	Well, Adobe explicitly states that the company has a right to access your content through both automated and manual methods, and that they define content as any text, any information, any communication, any material.
	Such as audio files, video files, electronic documents or images that you upload, import into, embed for use by or create using the services and the software.
	This, I think, is laying the legal groundwork for where they're going to go with the CCPA. And, of course, the CCPA doesn't include just software companies like Adobe.
	It also, they brought in hardware companies like Intel and the ARM manufacturing, you know, people that manufacture according to that protocol.
	And so it's got some journalistic sellouts to the government, propaganda journalists, and then it's got hardware and software, and they're going to label that.
	And now here we see is that, well, we're going to constantly monitor your stuff, but we don't like it.
	Well, we can shut you down.
	When users open up an Adobe program, such as Photoshop or Illustrator, for example, they're greeted with an update terms of use pop-up that has no opt-out option.
	Only accept and continue.
	And if you're not willing to accept the new terms, you can't use the software.
	It says, by closing this window, you'll be unable to continue using Adobe apps and services.
	By clicking accept and continue, you agree that you have read the accepted terms of use.
	Well, what do we do about this?
	The reality is that there's other software out there that does this.
	And many times, the other software that is out there is cheaper or free.
	And I have to pay a monthly service thing on it.
	Now is the time to move.
	I know you've used Photoshop and all this other kind of stuff, and you know your way around it, and you're going to have to learn a new interface.
	But stop investing in this.
	Stop investing your time.
	Stop investing your money into these tools.
	And stop feeding these monsters, because that's what they are.
	They're monsters who seek to enslave us.
	There are other editors out there.
	There's other audio programs out there.
	As a matter of fact, there are some really good free audio programs that are out there, or cheap programs that are out there, that you can...
	That you can own, and you don't have to pay a monthly price to use it.
	Bank of International Settlements has launched a Project Rialto to improve cross-border CBDC payments.
	This is all part of the idea.
	It all flows. You've got multiple tributaries flowing into this Mark of the Beast thing.
	And so the Bank of International Settlements, in their statement here, says, well, decentralized solutions, CBDC, and interlinked payment infrastructures are considered to be promising avenues to improve cross-border payments.
	Well, what does decentralized solutions have to do with CBDC? Nothing.
	CVDC is the most centralized of all these.
	Project Rialto, they said, is a collaboration of the Bank of International Settlement Innovation Hub, Eurosystem, and of Singapore Centers in partnership with several central banks.
	Well, of course, the Bank of International Settlements is the central bank of central banks.
	I've got an interview that I taped last week with a guy who is talking about some of the history of these organizations.
	And he said, yeah, you look at the Bank of International Settlement when they were set up.
	Many people believe that there was a good deal of collaboration, Wall Street, as well as the Nazis in terms of helping the Nazis come to power in terms of the transition after the fall of Germany into some of these organizations here.
	But that'll be tomorrow.
	It explores a new automatic FX settlement layer solution using CBDC as a safe settlement asset.
	That could be deployed for interlinked instant payment systems or for digital asset systems.
	And I say that this project, Rialto, is named after the Rialto Bridge in Venice, a bridge that connected the two sides of the Grand Canal.
	So, evidently, this is maybe a major bridge.
	I don't remember that bridge.
	I was briefly in Venice, again, when I went as a high school, end of high school.
	What I remember was a bridge of size.
	Because I remember the story about it.
	You know, I had a really totalitarian government there.
	We talk about things like star chambers and stuff like that.
	That goes back to that group.
	And so, when people were being led to this star chamber process, they knew that there wasn't going to be any justice.
	And as they were walking over this bridge, which is mostly enclosed, it had some, you know, openings in it so you could get air.
	People could hear what was happening there.
	People would be sighing and wailing as they were being drug off to that court, and they called it the Bridge of Sighs.
	Maybe that's what they should call this project.
	Project Sighs.
	They are sizing us up to ship us out, aren't they?
	And then finally, Russia.
	It's going to begin using CBDC for cross-border trade in 2025.
	And of course, Putin was always at Davos.
	He was always part of this inside group there.
	There's not such a difference between any of these countries as you think there might be.
	They are fighting against each other, but as Treebird said, there's nobody on my side.
	Fundamentally, there are few countries that have made serious progress in using national digital currencies, writes the chairman of the Russian State Financial Markets Committee.
	He said this is why technologically they are simply not ready to launch a digital currency in mutual settlements with other countries.
	However, he said, I'm confident that it'll be common practice within five years.
	Oh, okay. 2029?
	Well, that's when Strauss and Howe predicted the end of the fourth turning, isn't it?
	2030? Isn't that when the UN and Davos have all been telling us the new normal is going to be put in place?
	The digital ruble will probably be used for international payments as early as next year, said the chairman of the Russian Financial Markets Committee.
	With the first settlements carried out, not in the first half of the year, though, it should be launched more widely within our country, including for being used by legal entities.
	Maybe he's talking about government welfare payments.
	Just like Gates and the Commerce Department, right?
	Again, it doesn't really matter what the stated philosophy is, whether these people say that they're enemies of each other.
	They're doing the same stuff at about the same time everywhere, just like they did with the pandemic.
	And again, if you want to try to start...
	Preparing to get outside of some of this stuff, davidnight.gold.
	I'll take you to Tony Arterman's Wise Wolf Gold.
	And please like the stream wherever you're watching it.
	That helps us a great deal.
	We need to get the show out to a larger audience, and that's one of the things that helps us.
	It's difficult for people to be able to find it.
	If you can't find the show somewhere, And you're looking for it for somewhere else.
	Maybe you've got a problem with the stream that you're watching.
	You can always go to thedavidknightshow.com and that will show you links where you can get the show.
	Either the live show in the mornings or the show that goes up in the afternoon.
	We have both video and audio only podcast audio archives.
	And so we have links to all of that.
	And we're on all of the audio podcast platforms.
	Except for Spotify. But it can be hard to find us.
	That's why we ask you to like the stream.
	But you can also go to TheDavidKnightShow.com and you can find where the show is.
	You can find where you can support us if you would like to do that and keep the show going.
	And we have several different ways that you can do that.
	We have Zelle.
	We have a PO Box.
	We also have Subscribestar where you can subscribe to us.
	Many different ways. Cash App and others are there.
	And just before we go to break, John Bennett says GIMP is open source and far better.
	Yeah, yeah. Again, if you look around, you're going to find some free or low-cost stuff that is there.
	You don't have to pay them something like $60 a month or something like that to use the Adobe Suite.
	Uh, Jason Barker, don't update your software.
	If you do, you'll wind up on a lease instead of owning it.
	I had to reinstall several programs in the past year.
	Hopefully you all saved your setup files.
	I still have on my old computer.
	We don't use it. I don't use my old computer, but I still have on my old computer.
	Um, All the Photoshop stuff when you could buy it.
	John Bennett, that's what is nice about open source.
	I try to support that community as much as possible.
	Octo Spook said, Adobe needs to be taken to the Supreme Court.
	Their feet held to the fire and their criminal activities halted and brought to justice for this.
	Jason Barker, the terms are like a novel.
	Yeah. You have to agree in order to find out what's in it.
	Yeah, just like Nancy Pelosi.
	You've got to pass it to find out what's in it.
	You've got to agree to the terms of service to find out what's in it and what they're going to do to you.
	A tip. Thank you, Michelle Obama.
	Thank you very much for the tip.
	I really do appreciate that. We're going to talk about tips when we come back because Trump continues to push this pretty much everywhere he goes, that he's going to remove taxes on tips.
	So we're going to talk about that and talk about some of the other things that are happening in politics when we come back.
	Real quickly, though, Jason Barker says, I have Linux on all my machines as an alt OS. Erebon says, look for other programs under SourceForge.
	SourceForge. John Bennett, MO working on Linux, a bit of a learning curve, but it is a good OS. My son says, I recommend Manjaro Linux as a user-friendly distribution.
	Well, there you go.
	He follows that a lot more than I do.
	So, um, we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	Oh, yeah.
	Yeah.
	You're listening to the David Knight show.
	you.
	Okay, EcoTaxi, thank you for the tip.
	It says, kudos to your top quality journalism, Dave.
	It says, threat, bribe, is an obviously, unfortunately, continually, increasingly relevant neologism.
	Coined by one of our fellow...
	Now almost lifelong Christians, humanitarians, libertarians, and USA patriots who have been one of my friends.
	Offline for the last several years.
	And he's got a link to some of this as well.
	And also, Eric, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that very much.
	And let's talk a little bit about tips.
	I think, you know, as we talked about this over the weekend...
	Trump is going around everywhere and telling people that he's going to make all tips tax-free.
	I guess that's his way of connecting with the little people, you know?
	That's his involvement with little people.
	It's to leave tips for them as a billionaire.
	Well, okay, so everything I get is tips.
	Just a light bulb went off.
	I said, I'm going to have to start supporting Trump.
	If I support Trump and he gets in, you know, this is a promise that he actually might keep because it doesn't really step on anybody's toes like the completely restructuring of the tax system does or some of these other things.
	He might actually do. I mean, he's very earnest about this.
	It's like, yeah, something. Little people will love me if I can give them tips tax-free and that type of thing.
	So he might actually do that if he gets in.
	And then I have a tax-free existence, I guess.
	I guess I got to support him.
	No. I'm not going to do it.
	I'm not going to sell myself into slavery.
	You know, I always go back and I think about a funny thing happened on the way of the forum.
	I was in the pit band when we did that in high school.
	And there's this one song called Free.
	And Pseudalist the Slave, who's the central character in it, he's always, you know, trying to manipulate everybody to get what he wants.
	And he's talking about, you know, if I'm free, I can do this, I can do that.
	And then he has a moment and he stops and he says, wait a minute.
	If I was free, then nothing would be free.
	In other words, I'm getting a free ride here as a slave.
	And he stops for a moment and he says, do I really want to do this?
	And then he thinks about it and goes, yeah, I want to do it anyway.
	And so, yeah, I wouldn't be tax-free, but my freedom can't be bought.
	So, it's not so much the removing the tax on tips.
	But it is his idea that he sold to the CEOs when he met with them.
	First of all, he said, I'm going to lower your tax rate.
	It was lowered to 21%.
	Remember how much money they made?
	And Apple said, you know, we're embarrassed we've made so much money and we're going to blah, blah, blah, virtue signal about it.
	Well, what did they do? What did they use that lowered taxes for?
	They used it to buy their own stocks and repurchase their own stocks.
	They didn't use it to create jobs in America.
	None of it trickled down on us.
	But anyway, he lowered it to 21%.
	And then Biden raised the corporate taxes back up again.
	So this is back and forth.
	But now he says, well, I'll lower it to 20%.
	I'll go even better to them.
	And then he talked about how let's completely change the tax structure.
	Let's make taxes at the border.
	Completely fund the US government.
	We'll gradually transfer over to that.
	And of course, he's floated the idea of a 60% tariff and other things like that.
	Um... First of all, he's going to get a tremendous amount of resistance from these very large CEOs of these really large companies, these multinationals, because they don't want to have that tax burden on them.
	They don't want to pay those taxes coming into the country.
	So they're going to push back against them.
	The Federal Reserve is going to push back against them.
	The Federal Reserve wanted to set up the income tax.
	And to get rid of tariffs at the border, you know, when Jefferson was doing it, of course, the big issue here is the size of government.
	It's going to be an oppressive tax system regardless of how you collect the money if the government is spending this much money.
	And they could never tax us enough to cover the money that they're spending, of course.
	That's why when the petrodollar and the fiat currency and being the world's reserve currency, when that collapses, it's going to be tremendous economic percussions for us here because we've been living in la-la land in this fantasy world where we don't have to pay for anything.
	We just put it on a future credit card.
	And that's going to go away once we do that.
	And so, you know, I'll get to that in a second.
	So... If we were to actually pay for all the government, all this waste and fraud and abuse and everything, none of us would have anything left.
	So first of all, they're not going to push all of that out there, but it would be such a radical change, and I mean ripping out the roots, that I don't see that happening.
	Again, I would prefer a tax system that was essentially free trade within the United States with no income tax and where there was tariffs simply at the border where things were coming and going because that would encourage internal industry.
	It would help people internally with that.
	That is not what the multinational corporations want.
	So that isn't going to happen.
	That's a non-starter.
	There'll be too much resistance to that.
	Trump floated the idea of imposing an all-tariff policy that would ultimately enable the U.S. to get rid of the income tax.
	He talked about abolishing income taxes, making up for all the lost revenue purely through taxes on imported goods.
	And of course, whenever we talk about a radical change of the tax system, there's always concern about whether or not they're going to put this, instead of replacing what is there, if they're going to add to it.
	You know, we had these discussions when it was the flat tax, When they were talking about the fair tax or national sales tax, we've had all these different things put out there, and everybody's always kind of skeptical of the way the government operates to say, well, we might wind up having this new tax not replace the income tax, but be added to it.
	And so there's always the issue of that.
	But fundamentally, what it goes back to is the amount of spending.
	The amount of spending is unsustainable.
	And no matter how you collect the taxes, unless you cut the spending, which is another reason to show that Trump is not really serious about any of this stuff.
	He's not talking about what he has to cut.
	Nobody wants to talk about what they want to cut because that's going to gore somebody's ox and they don't like that at all.
	And then we had a fundraiser in London for the Trump campaign.
	And you might ask yourself, why are they doing a fundraiser in London for the Trump campaign?
	And this kind of stuff makes me disgusted.
	When I see politicians go to Israel and raise money, or I see politicians now going to London to raise money.
	You know, as I said, Washington is so corrupt.
	Everybody talks about how corrupt Ukraine is.
	Well, it's not as corrupt as Washington.
	You know, Washington is even more corrupt.
	And when you've got fundraisers being held in foreign countries, how is that not a violation of our election?
	Who are you selling favors to and for what?
	H.L. Mencken had the quote, he said, an election is an advanced auction of stolen goods.
	And so what are these people going to get back from it?
	This is the reason why The campaign spending has exploded, as I just picked the arbitrary point of the year 2000.
	$100 million for George W. Bush, $70 million for Al Gore, and yet you just had, in one week after Trump got that conviction, he made $400 million?
	And most of that was coming from big billionaire money, people who don't have America as not really their country.
	They may have citizenship here, so they can do business here.
	But they don't necessarily embrace American values.
	They can go anywhere they want. They'll go wherever the grass is the greenest at any given point in time.
	So when I see people going to a foreign country like Israel or going to London for this fundraiser, I'm disgusted.
	These people are selling us out to foreigners.
	What are these foreigners going to get out of this thing?
	It's a fundraiser hosted by an emerging British populist figure, Holly Valance, best known for her work as a model, pop star, and actress.
	May have even raised more money for the Trump campaign than first thought, says the report.
	The event was hailed by guest Rick Grinnell.
	It was Rick Grinnell. Well, that's Trump's virtue-signaling gay spy that he put in charge as a DNI, Director of National Intelligence.
	Again, an open homosexual who pushes for the LGBT stuff for Trump.
	And, you know, oh yeah, Trump is all about that.
	And, of course, Trump is. Believe him when he says that.
	Believe him when the log cabin Republicans are giving awards to Melania Trump.
	But again, the guy who was representing him there was Rick Grinnell.
	They said that they raised $3 million.
	It would be the biggest fundraiser outside the United States.
	Well, no. That would be the $100 million that Miriam Adelson, the widow of Sheldon Adelson, gave her.
	That dwarfs this.
	But the very fact that they're doing fundraisers outside the United States, I think it's disgusting.
	Holly Vance, Holly Valance rather, is a dual British-Australian citizen.
	She's not an American citizen. You see, when I tell people, you know, people say, well, who do you want for Trump?
	Who do you want for president? You don't like Trump?
	Well, you like Biden or something?
	It's like, I don't like either one of them.
	I said, who do you like for president of the World Economic Forum?
	Because you've got no more influence on who's going to be president in Washington than you do for who's going to be president of the World Economic Forum.
	You've got one little vote that may or may not be counted.
	What about the money?
	Well, you've got people in foreign countries that are giving him millions of dollars.
	Hundreds of millions of dollars.
	What do you think you're going to get out of it?
	Even Elon Musk said, you know, with George Soros, with all his money, he's going smart.
	He's investing in local elections.
	He's investing in district attorneys.
	You know, county by county area.
	Or he's going to the state and getting the state attorney general.
	But he gets a lot more bang for his buck.
	He doesn't want to participate in the presidential race.
	That's a fool's errand.
	And I realized that that was a fool's errand years and years ago, 30 years ago, when I was working with the Libertarian Party.
	It's like, you know, why are we engaged in this task like Sisyphus of pushing this rock up the hill every year, only to have it roll back down again?
	What's the point of ballot access if ballot access is just being used to do ballot access the next time?
	If we're not getting anybody elected at the local level to actually change our lives...
	What's the point of all this?
	Well, because that was the way that the Republicans and Democrats had set up the rules, and you might be able to retain ballot access if you get a certain number of votes for president, so you don't have to do this whole thing again.
	Otherwise, you've got to do it all again, and they would do it all again, every single time.
	So when you look at these foreign fundraisers, don't get fooled again.
	Focus, the election is focused on, should be focused on what's happening locally.
	That's where you should focus.
	The Department of Justice has declined to prosecute Merrick Garland after the House held him in contempt of Congress.
	Oh, well, you know, we've had some other people held in contempt of Congress, too.
	We've had Steve Bannon held in contempt of Congress.
	He's going to jail. Hunter Biden openly showed his contempt, stood in front, said, I'm not going to go talk to these people, and held a press conference.
	No charges against him by the House.
	They did bring charges against Garland, but now his own department says, no, we're not going to do anything with that.
	So, you know, there's not going to be any reform in Washington.
	For example, James Clapper, who committed perjury.
	Are you spying on Americans without a search warrant?
	No, Senator, not intentionally?
	No, no. And then we found out, we all knew that he was lying.
	And then we found out, you know, a couple months later, Ed Snowden leaked the stuff.
	He was obviously lying.
	Even Michael Hayden said, yeah, you got him to commit perjury.
	I blame Ron Wyden for that.
	No, Ron Wyden didn't lie to people about that.
	It was James Clapper who lied about that.
	And James Clapper was never, there wasn't a single Republican or Democrat Who wanted to come after him for perjury.
	For perjury. They let the statute of limitations expire of five years.
	Never did anything at all about it.
	That's the way these people operate.
	And you're not going to get anything done in Washington.
	It's too corrupt. America could see a surge in people who are not voting.
	Well, I don't recommend that.
	I do recommend that you vote locally.
	And you need to do things to...
	You know, try to reform the situation.
	Of course, you know, what Trump did in 2020, he added vote by mail.
	We all knew that was going to be a completely new level of corruption.
	And now, after railing against that, after raising all this money and everything, they've decided that they're going to do a better job of vote harvesting than the Democrats did.
	That's their answer. So they're going to leave that in there.
	And, of course, we had Elon Musk saying, get rid of all electronic voting.
	I've been saying this since I first did reports on this back in 2014, looking at the history of electronic voting, looking at what was going on in Texas in terms of them not keeping electronic records and backup files that were supposed to be audited.
	As a matter of fact, that was required in the Constitution.
	And the guy who was the head of the Bureau of Elections used to work for the same law firm as Hillary Clinton, and he had Rick Perry pay him big bucks to come from the Rose Law Firm to come back and run statewide elections.
	And every one of these elections, he tells all of the counties, don't keep the records.
	Even though it says it in the Constitution, don't keep records this time.
	And so we've seen how you can manipulate stuff so much more easily with electronic voting.
	You can rig an election with paper.
	You can rig it especially with mail.
	But you can especially do it with electronic voting.
	And what Musk was talking about was yet another scandal of electronic voting, this time in Puerto Rico.
	And I talked about how Smartmatic began.
	It's not owned by the same people anymore.
	It's changed hands many times, but it began in Venezuela by three pals of Hugo Chavez.
	They got him in power. They kept him in power.
	They had scandals in Brazil and, of course, accusations of the Marxist leftist stealing elections there.
	There were also accusations of fraud in the Philippines and various Mexican states where they had accusations.
	Now we've got Puerto Rico.
	Maybe they need to bring in the RICO Act.
	A poll found that only 80% of respondents said that they will definitely vote in November.
	We have never had an election in my lifetime where 80% of the people have voted.
	People understand that this is absolute garbage.
	We're going to take a quick break. Before we do, DGA, thank you for the tip, says Trump took $440 million from Sheldon Adelson in 2016.
	That bought the embassy move to Jerusalem and Jonathan Pollard being pardoned and put on a flight on Adelson's jet back to Israel for a welcoming parade.
	You're absolutely right. Absolutely right.
	Yeah, that's what you get for the money.
	Politicians are for sale.
	And, you know, $440 million, no big deal if you've got a fortune of $34 billion.
	Sheldon Adelson didn't hardly even touch his hoard of gold before he checked out to go meet God.
	EcoTaxi, thank you for the tip.
	Said, that was a mostly nice reading of my immediately previous tip message, Dave, except that what you mistook as a hyperlink was actually my aptly, derisively nicknaming Facebook page.
	Fatally fake fascist FBI and CIA feces book.
	So, yeah, that's right. He's got the different initials there.
	Jason Barker.
	Yeah, Gimp has a plug-in called Gimp Shop, and it makes it like Photoshop.
	Yeah. So, guys, get away from Adobe.
	It's an evil company.
	You know, they're going to be part of this CCPA, Coalition for Content, Prominence, and Authentication, or, as I prefer to call it, the Chinese Communist Party of America, run by the technocracy.
	Princess Wrong Think says, I don't want a real ID or my biometrics scanned to get online.
	I'm out. I'll quit using everything, and I'll quit participating in society.
	You know, there is a great deal to be said for the Hamish.
	They went with this...
	They went with this approach precisely for that reason.
	They froze the technology at a certain point because they didn't want to be dependent on outside people.
	And I don't know.
	I think it worked out pretty well for them in 2020.
	We'll be right back. In a world of deceit,
	Telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Talk about food.
	The World Economic Forum article calls for reinventing the global food system and praises products that are animal free.
	I'd like to have some products that are World Economic Forum free.
	I'd like to have some products that are free of the climate nihilism.
	I'd like to have some products that are free of the pandemic nihilism and all the rest of the stuff.
	The World Economic Forum is talking about reinvention of the global food supply.
	And praising alternative proteins made by animal-free products.
	Folks, understand that it's not just the food, but it's also the distribution of the food.
	This article from Daily Wire doesn't really get into the distribution aspect of it, but we could clearly see it in the Netherlands.
	Mark Rutte. He was part of a food distribution network there planned from the World Economic Forum.
	I can't remember off the top of my head what they called it.
	But he was there to control distribution of the food.
	But, of course, they were also very aggressive in terms of shutting down farms.
	No manure, no this or that under the idea that we ought to control nitrogen emissions.
	It's not even the nitrogen seeping into the water and creating algae.
	No, no, no. This is nitrogen emissions.
	Eliminate all animals.
	But it was also about...
	The food supply.
	And he had a member of his family or his wife's family was part of a company called Picnic.
	Bill Gates was an investor in that and they were going to be delivering the food.
	They wanted to shut down not just your ability to get real food, but even how you would get access to the food, the delivery aspect of it.
	And they made the Netherlands kind of a test subject for that.
	It's one of the reasons why He got rightfully clobbered by this new farmer party that's there.
	We'll see what happens, if they've got enough power to do anything about it.
	The World Economic Forum on Thursday put out an article titled, Feeding the Future.
	Why renovation and reinvention are key to saving our food system.
	They don't want to save it. I mean, when they talk about reinvention, they're not talking about saving it.
	They have a radical plan.
	When we talk about radical, remember, radical means that you rip it out by the roots.
	Radix, that's the Latin for root.
	The food transition aims to reshape the way society produces, distributes, consumes, and discards food.
	Again, distribution. A transformation that will impact the mutual advancement of human and environmental health, said the World Economic Propaganda.
	The propaganda then compared an overhaul of the food system to the global transition to renewable energy, such as solar, wind, power, and electric vehicles.
	How's that working out for us?
	Zero energy, zero food, zero COVID. These are all nihilistic policies to destroy what they claim they want to save.
	They said, That has developed animal free protein powder.
	Nestle said in 2022 that its animal free product is made through fermentation and is identical to the wheat protein found in cow's milk.
	But what else does it have in it?
	That's the question. The food transition is a pivotal moment in human history, says the World Economic Forum, demanding bold action across sectors, industries, and disciplines.
	There is no singular approach to transformation.
	But it is critical that the food industry rebalance their approach to innovation with significantly more investment put toward reinvention.
	We have to somehow stand in front of this, like Gandalf, and say, this shall not pass.
	We've got to tell them we don't want this change.
	And the way that we tell them that we don't want it is to refuse to participate in it.
	So they're pushing fake meat.
	Again, that was one article.
	Another one, creating a vibrant food innovation ecosystem.
	How Israel is advancing alternative proteins across many different sectors.
	Of course, they also experimented Benjamin Netanyahu and his own people with the vaccine.
	In Australia, this article talking about a local chain, Kohl's, in New South Wales, Australia, they announced that they would put buying limits on eggs due to a national shortage.
	And you know what's causing a natural shortage.
	A national shortage.
	It's not natural. It's unnatural.
	The government is going through and slaughtering chickens everywhere.
	And so this article was put up by the government.
	It says, don't stock up on eggs due to shortages.
	Don't do that. Yeah, so the government hates when you prepare.
	Because when you prepare, that messes up their plans.
	If you prepare for the catastrophe and the chaos that they're going to try to impose on you, they don't like that.
	They tell you don't prepare.
	And so this one person says, we're told by the leadership of the egg industry that there are plenty of eggs being produced in Australia.
	And if there are some, perhaps, temporary supply interruptions for some suppliers, then those gaps and those interruptions will be corrected very, very quickly.
	Well... Okay.
	So, again, let's just put aside for the moment how the PCR process lies to everybody, and you can't rely on anything that it says.
	As a matter of fact, you know, well, cycle thresholds are way, way down, but they've actually ramped in terms of reliability, but they've actually ramped it up now with digital PCR stuff.
	But let's just forget that for a second.
	Let's just assume that it was correct.
	Let's assume that when they get a positive PCR process that these animals really do have it, even though they don't have any symptoms, that they've really got what they're testing for.
	Now, why kill them?
	Why kill the entire flock?
	Why destroy an entire farm?
	Why not quarantine it and watch it?
	Because when they kill them, they then, you know, ship the bodies, they put them up on a conveyor belt, fly them through the air, and put them in an open-air truck and drive them.
	Wouldn't it be better just to seal them off and quarantine them?
	And then if you saw that the PCR test that came back positive without a sick animal was actually nothing, then you haven't killed all the chickens.
	Ah, but that's the point.
	It is to kill all the chickens.
	And if you did quarantine and watch, then what you would see is that the PCR is a lie.
	Alternative protein. The Pentagon is back at it using its troops as guinea pigs again.
	Oh, you thought it was just the vaccine?
	No. No.
	Alternative protein. The Pentagon contractor wants to feed U.S. troops lab-grown meat in order to reduce the CO2 footprint.
	Understand the Pentagon has been right up front.
	And all of this green nihilism from the very beginning.
	Are they going to have battery-powered missiles next?
	What are they going to do? Are they going to have, when they say they're going to have an artillery battery, do they mean that literally now as a lithium battery?
	A Pentagon contractor has received more than a half a billion dollars and From the Defense Department to produce lab-grown meat for America's soldiers in order to reduce the CO2 footprint.
	BioMADE is a public-private contractor with the DOD. Stop me if you've seen this before, but isn't that what they did at the NIH? Didn't they set up like a public-private partnership?
	Wasn't it the very people who were supposed to be looking at the vaccines and evaluating them?
	Weren't they making money off of this contract as well?
	A public-private partnership?
	This kind of corruption, folks, is the business model for the Chinese Communist Party.
	It is, by very definition, economic fascism.
	And so this kind of graph and corruption is there, and of course they're going to be producing a cell culture.
	They're going to sell tumor meat, or not sell it, but they're going to give it to the poor soldiers that they use as lab rats.
	It never ends, does it?
	Except our show ends.
	We'll see you tomorrow. Thank you for joining us.
	Have a good day. The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.

▲