Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 14, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:04:03

The David Knight Show - 06/14/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	You
	Using free speech to free minds.
	You're listening to The David Night Show.
	At the clock strikes 13, it's Friday, the 14th of June.
	Dear Lord, 2024.
	Well, today we're going to begin with the G7. Because the G7 is talking about war, but also about money.
	And, of course, all wars are bankers' wars, aren't they?
	So we're going to take a quick look at that, at what they are pushing.
	And we're also going to take a look at the surveillance that is coming our way.
	Always ramping up through Silicon Valley, through the tech companies.
	And we have a new step that has been taken by a very popular, probably the most popular of all of the video and videos.
	Photoshop, editing, and Adobe, of course, has taken another step towards surveillance.
	Stay with us. We'll be right back.
	Music Well,
	I ended the show yesterday talking about the veterans around 100 years old, 100 plus.
	One guy was 97 because he signed up early, before he was even of legal age.
	But they were looking at, what did we fight for?
	What has happened to this country?
	Very concerned about it.
	And of course, Google didn't care anything about...
	Celebrating D-Day, they celebrated a lesbian author instead.
	And so the same people that were, you know, a week ago talking about how much they appreciated the sacrifice of everybody to give us the countries that we now have.
	They are looking at ways that they can take us into another war.
	Looking at ways that they can steal everything from us.
	And that's what they're plotting at the G7. And it's kind of interesting.
	These people have never been more unpopular.
	This is the Telegraph.
	It says, look at the approval ratings of these people who are there at the G7. So we start with the German leader, Olaf Schultz.
	negative 51 points in terms of approval in other words people who approve of him versus people who disapprove of him Justin Trudeau negative 38 Emmanuel Macron, negative 31.
	Maloney in Italy, this is a host country, minus 10.
	So she is the most popular.
	And she has 10 points more people who don't like her than who do like her.
	Then we go to Biden, minus 18.5.
	The Japanese Prime Minister, minus 40.
	And then finally, Rishi Sunak, minus 54.
	The most popular of all of them.
	And he decided that since he's so unpopular, he will reinstitute the draft because he wants to take people, drag people into an unpopular war as well.
	And so Macron has announced snap elections at home.
	He had crushing defeats in the European Parliament.
	This is actually news that I had from the beginning of the week I've never gotten to yet.
	His party barely got into second place.
	Less than half of what Marine Le Pen's nationalist conservative party, whatever, they call them a nationalist party because they're concerned about borders.
	And, of course, these other people are not.
	We still don't know what's going to happen because, again, Maloney campaigned on that, but she did absolutely nothing about it either.
	As a matter of fact, she just, you know, continued business as usual pretty much.
	Macron's decision to call a parliamentary election opens the door for his party, which is deeply unpopular, to shed even more seats to rival parties in France's National Assembly.
	So, these were European Parliament elections.
	They took a drubbing, and now the French president has called for elections.
	Rishi Sunak has called for elections.
	And so they see the economy.
	Here's my take on it. I think what's going on, one of the reasons why Rishi Sunak and Macron are calling elections when they are so amazingly unpopular, I think they want to get out.
	They see what is happening with the crashing economy.
	They see what is going on with the war aspects.
	And so they want to hand this hot potato off to somebody else so they have plausible deniability to say, we didn't do it, you did it.
	And that's what they'll bicker over.
	And that's what they always do.
	So they always do.
	And this is, again, it's not even really their decisions.
	It's the people above them who put them in place in each of these countries just like they do in our country.
	The elections are illusions.
	That's what we should start calling the 2024 illusions.
	Who do you support in the illusion?
	Who do you want for president of the World Economic Forum?
	Because you don't have a say in what's going to happen in Washington either.
	Even though they pretend to give you a vote.
	Because they want you invested in that.
	So that you don't invest in yourself, your family, your community, your state.
	They don't want you doing anything that is local.
	They don't want you connecting with other people that are local.
	They want to keep you connected to the national news and to these reality TV shows.
	So these ruling parties have racked up All of this misery, they've got the commercial real estate stuff and the banking crashes going on here, you know, building up, storing up, I don't know, should we say wrath or consequences?
	They're all stored up, ready to burst over our heads.
	They want to get out of the way.
	If anything, this would be the reason why Trump would win.
	They would want to hand it over to him once and for all to say, see, look what these conservatives do.
	And we'll talk about Trump's tax policy that he threw out there.
	He's got all these...
	I got on Twitter... Last night to look to see if there's anything happening there.
	And boy, he really, just a couple of rumors and a couple of publications, really set the MAGA-verse on fire.
	Trump is going to get rid of the IRS. He's going to replace all of our domestic taxes with taxes at the borders.
	We'll talk about that.
	Of course, I said, regardless of whether I like this or not, I know he absolutely isn't going to do it.
	He had a great program, or somebody did, that was doing his website.
	Had a great program of about seven or eight or nine different steps in terms of replacing Obamacare with a better market system than we've ever had in healthcare in my life.
	Where people had purchasing power, where they had visibility as to what was going to happen with the kind of results that different hospitals and doctors got, where they had information to make those purchasing decisions, where they had money because they were given tax credits or whatever.
	They had money to make those purchasing decisions, and they had the governments out of the way to make those purchasing decisions.
	Of course, none of that happened. Can you imagine?
	If that had been in place with the planned pandemic, it would have made it even more difficult to manage.
	So after, you know, Trump didn't really campaign on that, he talked about how he's going to get rid of Obamacare.
	You know, hey, you want to see my plan?
	It's there on the website.
	But he didn't mention the specifics of it.
	It's just kind of a general thing.
	And then when he became president, they scrubbed that immediately.
	And he never mentioned it again.
	I think that's what's going on with the tax stuff.
	But let's finish up with the G7 first.
	The Social Democrat Party of German Chancellor Schultz also apparently faced a drubbing.
	According to national exit polls, it was running third behind the Alternative for Deutschland, or AFD. The clear winner.
	And again, you know, I don't expect even these...
	I don't expect any of the politicians to do what they say they're going to do.
	Just like Trump didn't do anything about Obamacare.
	Maloney didn't do anything about the border.
	Trump didn't do anything about the border.
	I mean, it's...
	Even if there were honest elections.
	Even if...
	Your vote made a difference, and we didn't have all this manipulation that goes back to even deciding who's going to be on the ballot.
	Nope, we're only going to have two.
	I mean, that's as phony right there.
	That's as phony as, sorry, no treatments are allowed except for, guess what?
	The vaccine. So lockdown, the vaccine's coming.
	Don't even talk about anything else.
	You talk about anything else, we're going to come after you.
	So when you see something like that, that's an instant tell, isn't it?
	So, the German Chancellor's worst ever result, and his party's worst ever result, in the European Parliament elections.
	According to preliminary results from five countries, right-wing parties estimated to have won at least 33 of the 174 seats available in Austria, Cyprus, Germany, Greece, and the Netherlands.
	So, is this a sea change?
	No. No. Because, you see, they're going to put together a coalition government of a lot of different parties.
	And so even though, in the European government, at least...
	We have so many different parties that it's not going to make a difference.
	They still have, of all of the leftist parties, they still have an overwhelming majority.
	But it is a big change that is happening there.
	And they are extremely unpopular.
	They're trying to figure out, they said, this is coming from Zero Hedge, they're trying to figure out how to maintain fiscal sustainability while investing in a greener future.
	Is that what they're trying to do?
	Are they trying to rig us into poverty and slavery?
	And those two things, of course, are mutually exclusive.
	They're not going to find a solution with that at all.
	And when we look at the way that they talk about the way the government runs, I thought it was kind of interesting to look at the structure of the European institution, the European Union, and how it's brought together there as an institution.
	They have a commission Which is above everything, and it is nominated by the member states.
	They propose legislation.
	Well, is that kind of like the Senate?
	Because the Senate used to be directly appointed by the individual states.
	So here they have a commission, but it is not as representative.
	Then they have a council, which is governments of the 27 member states have a direct presence there.
	That really is more like the Senate.
	And then the Parliament, which is directly elected by the EU citizens.
	So I think the Council is really more analogous to the way the Senate was originally set up in the Constitution.
	Appointed by the states, and here they have 27 member states.
	Then the Parliament, directly elected by the EU citizens, which they just had.
	But those two bodies don't propose legislation.
	And so when I look at this, I thought, well, what is the analogy here?
	The commission that they have there that is nominated by member states, I think that really is more analogous to the bureaucracy that we have here.
	And it's a bureaucracy that proposes the regulations.
	In other words, the council and the parliament or the member states will propose people to be on the commission.
	Just as you have the President or the Senate and House will propose people to run the bureaucracy, the various departments of the bureaucracy.
	And then that bureaucracy decides that they will decide what the rules and the laws are going to be, rather than our elected representatives.
	And so, in a sense, I can see that they have patterned this after the unconstitutional evolution of our government in reality.
	You have this bureaucracy that is unaccountable, unelected, but in total control, just like the commission is.
	I finally have an EU nightmare in Germany as Olaf Scholz is totally humiliated.
	And the interesting thing is, if we go back and look at this picture again, he is minus 51 in terms of approval.
	Rishi Sunak is minus 54.
	And I see people saying, well, you know, Reform Party and Nigel Farage just need to get out.
	They're going to hurt the Constitution, the Conservative Party.
	Maybe it's the other way around.
	Maybe the conservatives just need to get out of the way so they don't have a divided conservative vote there.
	I mean, they're a millstone around people's necks.
	So, in Germany, you had...
	Ursula Fond of Lying still had the number one party, even though AFD jumped up quite a bit.
	AFD got 16%, and Ursula Fond of Lying, her party, got 30%.
	And Schultz, who really took it on the chin, got 14%.
	But see, when you look at the party of the establishment, Ursula's party, and you look at Schultz, which was running the majority coalition, at 14%.
	So that's 30 plus another 14, that's 44%.
	Then the Greens are there at 12.5%.
	In other words, the bottom line is that all of the parties, except for one, A radical left wing.
	And they are going to completely swamp what is being done there.
	But I want to take a look at the G7 meeting.
	And it's kind of interesting as we look at the dynamics of it.
	We have all these people very unpopular.
	And we have Biden who makes his appearance...
	And does his usual zombie stares and wandering around.
	And so here is Biden wondering where he is as he wanders around.
	Everybody is kind of hurting him.
	Yes, now you go over here.
	Oh, okay. Well, thank you There we go, be careful going down those steps Okay. And then here he is.
	Everybody is focused on this guy who has parachuted down, but Biden doesn't notice that.
	It's a guy with a big parachute that's there, and he's looking around in a different direction until Maloney goes over and says, we're all over here.
	So then he pulls out his aviators and checks out completely.
	My son Whistler says, even if there were honest elections, we'd still need some honest politicians.
	None in sight. Because they're not allowed on the ballot by the dishonest politicians who have taken over.
	And a Syrian girl said, yeah, doesn't matter if you don't have an honest choice about who runs for office.
	That's right. AP Rumble Seat, the puppets play their roles and they're removed according to the upcoming agendas.
	Well, we can kind of get an idea of what the agenda is at the G7. War.
	And more money to Ukraine, no matter what.
	Italian leader, Georgia Maloney, as I just showed you there, had to go over and help Biden, who had no idea where he was or what was happening there.
	Except that he'd been told that he needed to support Ukraine, and Zelensky was there.
	And so he was trying to make his brave war talk here, but again, as usual, he could barely speak.
	It includes major commitments from Ukraine.
	To impact, excuse me, diplomatic, economic, and security reform.
	Avi, Avi, Avi, that's all, folks.
	Yeah, and then when he is challenged by somebody with an actual question, and this, it's like, wait a minute, you're supposed to stay on the script here.
	And what is your message to allies, including those here at the G7, about what more, if anything, the U.S. can do to drive towards a peace agreement?
	Thank you. I wish you guys would play by the rules a little bit.
	I'm here to talk about a critical situation in Ukraine.
	You're asking another subject.
	I'll be happy to answer it in detail later.
	Well, actually, that was about that.
	He just wants the prepared questions answered by the prepared people.
	And so what they were selling at the G7 was the idea that they got a 10-year security pact with Ukraine.
	And as they are pushing for this security pact...
	We have Russia and Cuba.
	They're not just, you know, going down there for a visit with their communist allies, Cuba and Venezuela and others.
	They also use this as an opportunity, sorry, they use this as an opportunity to show off their missiles, because this clearly is a threat.
	I'm going to keep going this way. Here they are launching multiple missiles.
	The West has declared war without rules on Russia, says Medvedev, the former Russian president.
	He said Moscow should use every opportunity to inflict maximum damage on Western nations that have declared war without rules.
	He said, are they afraid that we would transfer our arms to the enemies of the Western world?
	We should send every kind of weapon except nuclear.
	He said, are they afraid of anarchy?
	Are they afraid of crime waves in large cities?
	And there they are on the sub.
	This is their video showing what they're doing.
	So, you know, it's a big show. It's like, you know, if it was a thousand years or whatever ago, they would line up and they'd dance around in their war stuff.
	Grab dirt and throw it up in the air.
	It's like, okay, here we go.
	But that's what they're doing.
	They're firing off these missiles with all the smoke and everything.
	Are they afraid of anarchy and crime waves in large cities?
	Evidently not, because we've got the border wide open.
	We don't really care what happens.
	It makes it very easy if they want to create large crime waves in our cities.
	If they want to send in terrorists or people to sabotage our infrastructure, the border is wide open.
	We don't care about that.
	It's so arrogant, these people.
	But it's not that they're arrogant.
	It's not that they're stupid. The people who are running Biden and these other puppets that are there, Want to destroy America.
	We should help to disrupt their municipal authorities, he said.
	Yeah. And so he said Russia could trigger a war in space, a war of psychological warfare campaign against Western citizens.
	I think that's already been done by our own governments, though, don't you think?
	So they tremble under blankets in their cozy homes.
	It seems to me like four years ago we were trembling under cozy blanket masks.
	While we stayed at home. While we got in the cars, rolled up the windows, and the husband and wife were sitting there with masks on.
	Seriously? To turn their life into a never-ending nightmare, which they cannot distinguish reality from the wildest fiction.
	So, who will do it to us first?
	Well, the Russians? I mean, again, look, Putin is in a competition with these people, no doubt about it, just like Trump is.
	But they have, whichever side is there, they've all been part of these globalist confabs, hanging out with Schwab, hanging out with the UN. There's no good guys in any of this stuff.
	And they are going to not so much fight with each other as they will with us.
	The use of F-16s over Russian territory is not escalation, says the Secretary General of NATO. Stoltenberg.
	Yeah, it's no big deal.
	You know, if Russia wanted to fly fighter jets over America, it's no big deal, right?
	Ukraine has the right to defend itself, he said, and this includes striking legitimate military targets on the territory of Russia, said Stoltenberg.
	He said, we have the right to help Ukraine, and by doing that, NATO allies don't become a party to the conflict.
	And as RT says, Moscow perceives the entire conflict as part of a U.S.-initiated proxy war.
	Maybe this is one of the reasons why these people are the most unpopular they've ever been.
	And the bad news about all this is that as they sink in the polls, as their economies are sinking and all the rest of this stuff, as Gerald Slenty, who's going to be on with us later in the day, said, they take us to war.
	They take us to war. That's why these losers who are throttling us down, deliberately throttling us down with their green nightmares, That is why they meet and they talk about war.
	As they steal money.
	It's just amazing.
	From anybody they can get their hands on.
	SFLO0818, they put the lowest of low in for present to make Trump look good.
	Yeah, and they still can't make it look good.
	American. Hegelian dialectic.
	Either left or right. Never up.
	That's right. Stealth patriot. At least the Democrats are honest about who they are.
	A bunch of communist autocrats.
	Yeah, the Republicans are lying backstabbers and most of them are Fabian socialists.
	Exactly right. Exactly right.
	Yeah, we know you have the fake opposition that are out there.
	You know, they are supposedly the antithesis, right?
	And they're not.
	They're not. They're just there to move us along in the Hegelian dialectic in a compromise synthesis that's there.
	Vex the First. Look how many people had to be killed to install a president in Mexico.
	Yeah. I can't imagine what it really is like in America where the consequences are much higher.
	Soylent Go, the only thing I like about Biden is that he's almost dead.
	The Syrian girl.
	How truly pathetic that the U.S. has become.
	Wonder if we've hit the bottom of the barrel yet.
	And KWD-68, Mr.
	Magoo, was sharp.
	Next to this fool.
	Yeah, exactly right.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to take a real quick look at the economy, because that was a big part of what they were talking about there as well.
	And their actions there are burning down all the economies, as well as the United States, as well as the U.S. dollar.
	We'll be right back.
	I'm gonna go get it.
	You're listening to the New York Times.
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	show.
	Well, is it the end of the empire?
	Fifty-nine nations are looking for BRICS membership.
	An empire that is built on phony monopoly money, on theft, on invasion.
	Leaders have a quest to de-dollarize and to end U.S. hegemony at the BRICS summit.
	And that just ended, just before the G7 began.
	So we got seven highly unpopular leaders in their countries.
	And then we had 59 countries involved in this BRICS meeting.
	The U.S. financial and military hegemony continues to come under increasing duress.
	As more and more nations grow tired of its dominance and influence on the world stage, though not reported in Western media, the rest of the world has grown very tired of this preeminence.
	A number of nations have expressed interest in officially joining BRICS, which was Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa initially.
	Now it's being reported that 59 nations are seeking membership and as I said yesterday One of the biggest issues is the fact that the Saudis are looking to join The Saudis who used to be our partner to create this petrodollar That was Bretton Woods to after it became known to everybody that even though we had promised to back our currency with gold We weren't doing it. And so after that con game collapsed and we lost the confidence of different countries
	they came together with the idea that Saudi Arabia would do all the purchases in US dollars and they would make that essentially the the international standard Currency and so they are now not doing that anymore they're accepting currencies from other countries and they're without having to convert everything to dollars and They are even now looking to join bricks
	Putin also pointed out at the conference of the BRICS conference that the US is a monopoly in the global financial system Pointing out that it was making serious money from this exploitation, but also expose the fact that the US owes the global market 54 trillion dollars and that $54 trillion debt, he said, is not backed by anything.
	He said America is, quote, breaking its own tool of greatness, the dollar.
	Arguing that the U.S. actively blows other countries away from the dollar until they decide not to rely on it anymore.
	Using the monopoly position of the dollar, the U.S. consumes a trillion dollars a year more than it produces, taking these resources from other countries.
	Putin's got to up his game here.
	I mean, that's happening like every hundred days.
	I mean, it's not every year.
	It's now every hundred days or so.
	So, Winepress comments and says, when the dollar is eventually dethroned and made irrelevant, hyperinflation will set in immediately, and that'll be the final straw that broke the camel's back, and the country will descend into madness on top of other colliding issues.
	Well, I think it's going to be a good deal of time of slow degeneration in that.
	I think the more immediate concern is going to be things like Civil War infrastructure attacks and things like that.
	And again, even when you look at something like infrastructure, there are so many different angles that everything is being attacked.
	We have the Biden administration is trying to slowly dismantle the infrastructure piece by piece while they open up the border and somebody else can come in and just, you know, take out a few transformers strategically and take the whole thing down in large areas.
	So, you know, is it going to be done suddenly or gradually?
	Well, it certainly is always being done gradually with the green agenda.
	The G7 leaders agree to provide Ukraine with $50 billion.
	And they're doing it with stuff they stole from Russia.
	See, this is why 59 countries are moving towards BRICS. Because they're busting the tool that gave, you know, the U.S. is taking the thing that gave it its power.
	And it's using it like a hammer everywhere.
	And it's breaking pieces of it off.
	And so these thieves have a plan to provide $50 billion to Ukraine that they stole from Russia.
	Actually, they froze $280 billion of Russian assets.
	And the thieves in Washington wanted to give all of that $280 billion to Ukraine.
	But the Europeans said, no, no, no, no.
	We're not going to do that. We will...
	Let's give them...
	Three billion a year, which is the interest that we'll earn on these Russian assets.
	Let's give them the interest on the $280 billion that are frozen.
	And to give you an idea, that $280 billion is about 9% of Russia's GDP, which is $2.2 trillion, roughly.
	So, you know, they stole about 10% of their GDP, and the U.S. just wants to turn all of it over to Ukraine.
	The Europeans say, well, no, let's just give them, we'll just leave the capital there and pretend that we're going to give it back at some point in time, and we'll just give them the interest on it.
	But the U.S. is hell-bent on war, isn't it?
	This is not about Ukraine.
	It's pretty clear. This is an aggressive move by NATO to try to destroy Russia.
	And it's such a dangerous thing to back anyone or anything into a corner where they have to fight for their life.
	It's just beyond belief.
	It is absolutely, in everything that they do, There's this nihilism, as I said.
	Don't talk about climate alarmism.
	It's climate nihilism.
	They want zero everything.
	They want to zero out our infrastructure, everything that we have in our life.
	You will own nothing.
	You'll eat bugs and all the rest of the stuff.
	Everything is about zeroing out population, what we have, what we own, what we're able to do.
	Everything has to be taken to zero.
	And, of course, no better way to do that than to have a war between the two big nuclear powers, right?
	And so the European Union said, well, we're going to leave the 280 and give them 3 billion.
	The U.S. says no, no.
	And so as a compromise, they're going to steal 50 billion and give it to Ukraine.
	Because everything must be given to Ukraine, of course.
	Nothing for us, nothing for the people of Europe, everything for Ukraine.
	Russia has made it clear that it would view either plan as theft of its sovereign funds and is preparing to retaliate.
	Stealing the money makes reconciliation between Russia and the West even less likely.
	They don't want any reconciliation.
	Since lifting sanctions would mean having to give assets back to Moscow that have already been spent.
	The move will also reduce faith in the Western banking system and speed up global dedollarization.
	So, again, they're kind of burning the bridges, aren't they?
	Burning the ships, I should say.
	Not going to be able to go back even if we say, okay, you want some peace talks?
	Well, we're not going to go to the peace talks.
	Well, other people like to have some peace talks.
	Well, we're going to take the money and we're going to spend it.
	So you can't even give them the money back that we stole.
	Do the new U.S. sanctions mark Russia's final divorce from the dollar?
	because it's not just that money that they stole.
	In what may be the most ambitious package since the initial wave back in February 2022, the American regime has increased the scope for applying secondary penalties on foreign financial institutions who are found working with restricted Russian entities and placed the Moscow Exchange and the Clearing House under blocking sanctions among other measures. These are all new measures.
	The exchange subsequently announced that it was suspending all settlements in dollars and euros.
	And euros.
	So again, war by using their economic power.
	Destroying their economic power and our economic power.
	And finally, when we look at what is happening with economics here.
	Predistribution of free money.
	This is what's now being put out by the Wall Street Journal.
	Yeah, as I said, the so-called conservatives of today were the leftists of my youth, and the leftists of my youth are now the overt Marxists.
	But I don't know, maybe the conservatives are going Marxist as well.
	Let's shore up the safety net.
	With pre-distribution.
	Not redistribution, but pre-distribution.
	This is what the Wall Street Journal op-ed piece says.
	For nearly a century, we relied on a suite of programs known as the social safety net.
	Nets kind of trap you.
	Nets hold you down, don't they?
	And that's exactly what the great society and all these welfare systems have done.
	They haven't helped anybody. They've made people dependent on the government.
	People who, you know, are essentially trapped in The idea is straightforward.
	Let the market determine the rewards to capital and labor and to high and low wage earners, but then allow the government to redistribute money through progressive taxes, social security, unemployment benefits, and other transfer payments.
	If pursued vigorously, such programs could achieve what FDR called a New Deal and what Lyndon Johnson called a Great Society.
	America, however, doesn't pursue these policies vigorously enough.
	This is the Wall Street Journal.
	These are the people who used to champion capitalism and markets, right?
	They don't. Like I said, they are the Lyndon Johnsons of my youth, the FDRs of my parents' youth.
	And then the guy writing this in the Wall Street Journal says, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD, tracks member countries' comparative social spending, defined as cash benefits, direct in-kind provision of goods and services, and tax breaks with social purposes.
	They look at this as a percentage of GDP. Benefits may target low-income households, the elderly, disabled, sick, unemployed, or young persons, and by this measure, We just aren't doing enough with welfare.
	We only waste 22.7% of the GDP. In France, they waste 31.6%, and in Germany, 26.7%, which explains why the EU is the beacon of global leadership, technology, jobs, production, and innovation, says ZeroHedge sarcastically, and then adds, no, they're not, actually.
	Look, again, the welfare doesn't help anybody.
	And there are times that people do need help.
	I'm not hard-hearted about this, and I've lived long enough to go through situations where we needed help.
	And it's always the best if it's coming from friends, family, from church, local, where people see the need and they help.
	And rather than having an impersonal bureaucracy that has an entitlement program and says, if you check these boxes, you get the money.
	And they don't know if people are just kicking back and using the system.
	And they don't know, they don't encourage people to take a different path in life, to learn something new or whatever.
	That always was the most important part of helping somebody.
	And I remember when Hillary Clinton was pushing for complete government takeover of healthcare.
	She wanted to do it all at once, rather than gradually, as Obama and Trump did.
	And so... She came down and I got up and I said, well, look, there's always a place, you know, we should look at how certainly people need help and we need to find ways that we as a society can start to go back and do this with private institutions and charity.
	And boy, when I mentioned the word charity, This liberal crowd, because it was a Democrat district, hardcore Democrat district, deep, deep blue district, I got resoundingly booed because I said charity.
	And it's like, wow. Yeah, they believe they're entitled to your money.
	And they're not. People, there is just, it doesn't functionally work.
	And the truth is that it is more blessed to give than to receive.
	People don't like to accept money.
	It makes them feel inferior to accept money.
	They want to believe, I've got the right to that, and I'm not depending on your charity.
	And that's why they pushed this entitlement idea.
	And yet, the reality is that we're missing out on both efficiency and wisdom in terms of how this money is being given to people who really need it.
	And it is a real blessing to be able to give somebody help.
	And that help isn't just, well, here's some cash for today.
	It's helping them to change their life, and we miss all that.
	But what they want for us is universal basic income.
	A kind of dependency.
	An even bigger welfare state.
	And it's not just the Wall Street Journal.
	I've seen this with other authors.
	Even going back to Reagan.
	You had Charles Murray, who wrote a book called Losing Ground, about how the welfare system had failed the very people it was supposed to help.
	And yet now, he's one of the supporters of universal basic income.
	He's flipped, as far as I'm concerned.
	Because universal basic income is just universal welfare for everybody, to make everybody dependent on government.
	Just like you hand out food and treats and stuff to pacify an animal and turn it into a pet, because it no longer can feed itself.
	That's what this is about. Artificial intelligence and UBI. Both of these things being pushed at the same time.
	Pushed by the same people. The artificial intelligence community pushing UBI extensively.
	Why? Because all of them are about creating dependence.
	And then comes the CBDC and the surveillance to keep the slaves in line.
	Look, you want to be able to get out of that.
	You don't want to have to be trapped in that.
	So again, Tony Ardobin can help you to accumulate gold.
	It's one way that you can start to get out of this gold and silver.
	He can help you with transactions small or large.
	He can help you to gradually accumulate it on a regular basis and still get a better price as part of a group buy with his Wolfpack.
	Just go to davidknight.gold and Tony can help you with all that stuff.
	We're going to take a quick break and when we come back...
	We're going to take a look at Pride Month because it's now all about the flags.
	It's kind of interesting. Booty Gay has jumped into this.
	And we even have James May.
	From Top Gear, used to be Top Gear, I guess, in the UK, has basically put his head in the guillotine by speaking out against the authoritarianism and the intolerance and the fact that there's just flags everywhere, such an excessive amount.
	He calls it bunting because they have just covered the streets and the buildings with rainbow flags everywhere.
	And he says it's getting rather intolerant.
	And authoritarian. Well, he's going to find out just how tolerant and authoritarian they can be.
	We'll be right back.
	So, uh, I'm going to go ahead and start the video.
	Okay.
	And now the David Knight show Well, I have a coque spook says by to make a great war president, yeah money Which way to the front And then you run the opposite direction.
	AP Rumble seat.
	They want to take us down.
	China is selected to be the big kid on the block now with a CCP slave credit score.
	Absolutely. China is the beta test.
	For these multinational technocrats, they have rolled all this stuff out there for stem sellers.
	Pre-distribution is always a word that you want to hear.
	Yeah, it's kind of like pre-crime.
	Anticipatory intelligence. Anticipatory taxes.
	How about that? KWD 68.
	Middle class percentage has dropped about 10% in the last five years.
	I believe that statistic is low.
	Well, just take a look at what happened yesterday.
	Elon Musk got his $56 billion bonus.
	It boggles the mind how much money that is.
	I know, it's not, well, I mean, I guess it increased his net worth quite a bit, even though he's, I guess now he's the richest man in the world again.
	Larry Ellison got $14 billion yesterday.
	And it was just the other day that I was talking about Miriam Adelson and how, oh, okay, so she got from her casino gangster husband, Sheldon.
	She got $33, $34 billion.
	I said, so she's 79 years old.
	She's got maybe another 10 years or whatever.
	Maybe longer she can get some fresh blood to live off of.
	Some kids or something.
	Anyway. But, you know, what does she have to spend on a daily basis?
	You know, half a million dollars a day or something for the next 10 years?
	And she can spend that much and still not run out of money?
	It's insane where these people are.
	And it's insane how easy it is for them to affect elections.
	As I said, she gave $100 million to Trump.
	And, you know, let's just, to make it easy to understand, let's just call the $33 or $34 billion, let's just call it $30 billion.
	And let's just divide her net worth and her contribution by a million so we know what we're talking about here.
	So that would be like somebody who had $30,000 in the bank and they gave Trump $100 and now they get whatever they want for the country that they really love, the country that they live in, the country that they love, which is not America.
	And for that $100, you have access to the entire treasury of the United States.
	Get unlimited amounts of money out of that.
	What kind of a messed up system is this?
	Of course, as Trump said, Israel owns Congress and rightfully so, he said.
	And I guess they own him now too, don't they?
	$100 million that he got from one donor whose sole concern is Israel.
	She's not an American. She doesn't care anything about America.
	Except to rip it off and exploit it.
	$100 million was the entire campaign 24 years ago.
	George W. Bush. He spent $100 million.
	Everything that everybody spent.
	$100 million. The entire thing.
	And Al Gore's entire thing was $70 million.
	Now we've got one donor who does that.
	You got the big money coming into Washington.
	Why? Because of corruption.
	It's the corruption that's drawing them in.
	The corruption in this fiat currency that there's no check or balance on.
	They can spend all of that money and there's no balance on it whatsoever.
	And so it's like this giant black hole of corruption.
	Drawing in money from all over the world.
	It's not just Americans and American billionaires.
	No. Ukraine is a big money laundering operation.
	And so it's one of the reasons why they're sending all this money.
	More money into Ukraine.
	Because it's going to find its way back as kickbacks.
	Zelensky and his gang of crooks are going to be stealing it left and right.
	And then they're going to send some of this money back to the big guy, just as they've done in the past.
	And even when people find out about it, there'll be no penalty for it.
	And of course, Miriam Adelson can bribe Trump right out in the open.
	And that's a good thing.
	We should be happy that an Israeli billionaire is bribing somebody who's running for president.
	Nothing at all to be concerned about.
	Talia 2021, biggest tax theft is inflation.
	That's right. And my son, Whistler, says, didn't Musk give himself that bonus after laying off more than 10% Tesla employees?
	Yeah, yeah. Well, I don't know when the bonus was calculated because...
	What happened was he had it incorporated up in Delaware, which a lot of people do.
	And the Delaware judge said, and they had decided to give him that compensation.
	And the judge said, that's too much.
	He's like, you can't decide that as a judge.
	And he's right about that.
	And so he decided to reincorporate, move the company's corporation to Texas or whatever.
	And, but then he had to get approval, I guess, from the board, and I don't know, now that he has had to lay off more than 10%, you would think that he might reconsider if he really cared about that, but no, they don't care about anybody.
	But I thought that Musk was a benevolent billionaire.
	People at Babylon Bee are talking about, you know, and I see WND, they'll say, look at this.
	He just sacrificed $40 billion or whatever to buy Twitter, and he's losing that money and everything.
	He hasn't lost that money.
	And he wants to do artificial intelligence, and he wants to use Twitter as a hive mind, and he's trying to build a political base of grassroots support for himself.
	Ask yourself what his long-term plans are.
	He's in his 50s.
	He's building for the future with Twitter.
	He has not given us free speech on a silver platter.
	Free speech is a lot bigger than just one social media platform.
	Whistler says, pre-distribution sounds a lot like MMT. Modern monetary theory, or the magic money tree, as I call it.
	Print money to give to their friends and the people the government wants to win, and then you tax it back from the people they want to fail.
	Well, that's exactly right.
	Well, let's talk about Pride Month.
	You know, June is Pride Month.
	June used to be the month of weddings, but now it's Pride Month.
	Today used to be Flag Day, but now the only flag that you're really allowed to fly is the Pride Flag.
	And we had Pete Buttigieg go on with a little prepared statement on CNN about how horrific Judge Alito's wife flying the flag and appeal to heaven.
	Oh, you can't do that.
	You're not allowed to fly this white flag with a...
	We want an appeal to Satan.
	We want the rainbow flag of the LGBT. And so, Zero Hedge says, We're good to go.
	The primary goal is to create a vehicle for controlling speech and a shield for collectivist ideologues so they can pursue political power while hiding behind proclamations of equal rights.
	In other words, the political left and their globalist benefactors use the pride movement as a way to paint themselves.
	That's an interesting choice of words.
	Paint themselves.
	Since we've had so much about these rainbow intersections on the streets.
	They paint themselves as the underdogs and the heroes.
	Anyone that opposes them is automatically thought of as oppressors.
	They're thought of as oppressors and villains.
	At least that's the strategy they hope to exploit.
	And so they have really taken...
	They put these rainbow things on the streets.
	And we've had some people who have kind of burned out on all this pride stuff.
	And so they did some burnouts on these rainbow things.
	Leaving tire marks.
	That's just so... Isn't that awful?
	Well, you know, I think people have had enough.
	Yeah. And then you have Lime has...
	Sorry, this is a kid stomping on...
	Yeah, let me have that rainbow flag.
	He's had it with all the stuff that's been pushed on him in school, hasn't he?
	And then I think you've got Lime scooters will now shut down if they're driven over the pride flag.
	I mentioned this the other day because somebody did a burnout like that in Spokane, Washington with one of these electric scooters.
	I'm sure that burnout wasn't nearly as good as it was with that truck.
	And we've seen several of these things, and unfortunately, they've found these teenagers who are doing that kind of stuff, and they're just disgusted, just like that young kid.
	It's being shoved down their throats everywhere.
	And so the local governments came after them, and the company that rents the electric scooters I mean, all new respect for these electric scooters.
	I was not aware that you could do a burnout with them.
	How'd you get me one? But a ride one somewhere.
	They just looked, they didn't look like they had the capability to do that.
	I guess it's that electric torque that they've got.
	But, so the company Lime that has these scooters, Put a geofence on it.
	So, you know, you drive in that area, it just turns it off.
	So you can't do a burnout on it.
	And then you have this town in Canada.
	Said, we are so proud of Pride Month.
	You see something wrong with this?
	Little photo op that they're doing here.
	You got Super Mario there, I guess, painting the rainbow stuff.
	You notice that his roller, as everybody has pointed out, has no red paint on it.
	He's not painting anything.
	It's just a photo op.
	It's all so phony.
	Being pushed by the government's virtue signaling, I guess, or you could say he's virtue rolling with all of that.
	Going back to Zero Hedge, they said, consider for a moment when it comes to the pride flag, a political symbol, free speech goes out the window.
	Burn an American flag or deface an historic monument, you're unlikely to be prosecuted and you are protected under the First Amendment.
	But if you burn a pride flag or you deface a pride mural crosswalk in the wrong city, you might be convicted of a felony or of a hate crime.
	Yeah, we watch these people deface, destroy statues, everything else that they hate.
	The American flag, you name it.
	Everywhere. And that's great.
	But, you know, this is a...
	That's free speech.
	You're doing that against a political thing.
	But I guess if you destroy the rainbow flag or these crosswalks, oh, now you're impinging on their religion.
	Is it? The act of protest is equated to an act of violence if it's done against the people that are in power, right?
	Who are you not allowed to criticize?
	Those are the people who rule you.
	So Spokane, Washington city leaders literally broke down in tears during a press conference to address the heinous crime of pride crosswalk being ruined.
	Just can't handle it, can they?
	The pride flag isn't just about gay people having the same rights as everyone else, because it's about giving them superior privileges, really.
	In Western countries, they already do have the same rights.
	It is a symbol of a new ideological order that the rest of us better not oppose.
	And this philosophy of double standards is applied liberally by Pete Boudigae.
	And here is a little exchange that they had set up.
	They had an interview that lasted, I don't know, maybe about 10 minutes.
	And this guy has already got the final question already teed up and he throws it off to Boudiguet so Boudiguet can make his little virtue signaling conclusion.
	I also hope that most Americans can understand the difference between a flag that symbolizes love and acceptance and signals to people who have sometimes feared for their safety that they're going to be okay And insurrectionist symbology.
	I'll just leave it at that.
	Secretary of State, Pete Buttigieg, thank you so much for being with us.
	Oh, thank you so much. There's just nothing I can add to that.
	That is just so comprehensive.
	And what they were talking about is you saw the Chiron there.
	The whole thing was about Justice Alito's wife said, I'm sick and tired of seeing these pride flags.
	I'm going to put up, you know, one of these appeal to heaven flags or something like that.
	And he's telling me to wait until he's finished with his stuff.
	But, you know, it's that type of thing.
	And so he's saying, can you imagine, you know, the Supreme Court justice would put up a flag that was part of the founding of our country?
	He doesn't say it that way.
	But they've just got too much power.
	And we need to understand just how important it is to have these rainbow flags everywhere.
	Everywhere. Can't have this flag anywhere.
	No. Gotta have those rainbow flags everywhere.
	Just imagine the cynicism of a politician who, though, goes to conservative voters and And they all believe that he is chosen by God to lead them to some promised land that they've imagined in their minds.
	And yet, this is who he is!
	LGBT for Trump.
	Yeah, that's right. There he is holding the big pride flag.
	And, you know, pushing with the pride merchandise and all the rest of the stuff.
	Make America Great Again, all in rainbow colors.
	This is his website the last time he ran.
	But, of course, he hasn't changed.
	He's still holding events for LGBT at Mar-a-Lago.
	They're still giving awards to Melania.
	And then you've got those other people there that are going to help us.
	You know, these newly minted Christian nationalists like Michael Flynn, who's back there pushing transgenderism on a Navy SEAL after it was only the second year that they'd had Pride Month at the Pentagon.
	And it was Michael Flynn who was running it.
	Michael Flynn who was pushing this to the Navy SEAL, who has now said that he wished they hadn't done that.
	He said, they completely gaslit me on this stuff.
	And he's come out and he says, if they can gaslight me as an adult Navy SEAL, what are they doing to kids?
	Well, we know exactly what they're doing to kids.
	And we know exactly who Michael Flynn is, and we know exactly who Trump is.
	Trump was pushing it with his beauty contest and all the rest of this stuff a long, long time ago.
	Well, Buttigieg is saying that the pride flag is a symbol of love and acceptance, while other flags that would be flown at the Alito's home symbolize insurrection, and therefore are not protected speech.
	His comments are in reference to a secret recording of Martha Ann Alito, Samuel Alito's wife, who says she wants to fly a religious flag to send a message to neighbors across the pond who fly pride flags.
	Yeah, she wasn't even saying that she was going to do the appeal to heaven.
	She said, I want to put up a Catholic flag, a sacred heart, when they're putting that out there.
	Because again, we're talking about religion versus religion.
	She has flown the appeal to heaven, and that has freaked them out as well.
	CNN insinuates this is unacceptable thinking by the wife of a Supreme Court justice.
	And so, again, they also arranged for Buttigieg to have his little soundbite there.
	If you disagree with the tenets of the Pride movement, or if you stand against the tenets of the progressive regime, you are an insurrectionist by definition.
	These are not the sentiments of peaceful people who are looking to correct inequality.
	These are the sentiments of power mongers seeking supremacy.
	Yeah, you know, whenever you see these people railing against patriarchy, they want matriarchy.
	When you see them railing against heterosexuals, they want homosexuality, and that's all they really want to tolerate.
	And they're doing this everywhere, even in Mexico.
	And of course, you know, we've just had a leftist feminist girl boss in Mexico.
	Mexicans that I know said, how in the world did that happen in that Mexican culture?
	Well, it's probably a selection rather than an election.
	And right away we've got the Mexican government is putting up this great big rainbow thing.
	Oh, wait a minute. It looks like somebody is ripping it to shreds from the bottom up.
	Yes, this is exactly what we need.
	What these Mexican citizens are doing to this pride banner in Mexico.
	We need a bottom-up solution.
	And that's what they're doing right here.
	They grabbed this banner from the bottom and ripped it and then started going in different directions.
	And they're ripping that thing down and they're doing it from the bottom up.
	And that's what we need to do to this agenda.
	Destroy it from the bottom up.
	So they've got the right idea there.
	So let's get to James May.
	James May is...
	Said in a Twitter post, and boy, all hell is going to break loose on this poor guy now.
	He said, pride is becoming authoritarian.
	He said, while I have observed and admired what you have achieved over my lifetime, may I respectfully suggest that you are borderline guilty of too much bunting.
	It may be seen as authoritarian and therefore oppressive.
	See if you can find a picture of that.
	It's at the end of that article stack there.
	That street there.
	There's a picture of that stuff.
	And there we go. Look at that.
	I think that that's not borderline excessive.
	I think that is excessive.
	Scroll up so people can see that.
	Look at that. It's just everywhere.
	Every few feet. No, show the picture.
	Every few feet.
	There are five flags going across the street, as far as you can see there.
	It is too much bunting, I think.
	And I think he's trying to be funny, because he puts too much bunting in uppercase initial caps, and then he puts behind it TMB. He doesn't realize just how humorless these totalitarian dictators can be.
	Listener KWD68 says, Jeremy Clarkson, also top gear, has been farming and criticizing the British bureaucracy.
	I'm sure the left despises May and Clarkson.
	Not sure about the other guy if he's left the lefty camp.
	Yeah, I don't know about Richard Hammond.
	I haven't watched Clarkson's farm thing.
	I just got enough problems with attacks on farmers and stuff like that in the United States, and I just don't have the time to watch anything anymore.
	But yeah, we used to enjoy watching Top Gear a lot.
	We used to watch it with the kids. We always enjoyed their sarcasm and humor, but it's not going to be enjoyed by the left.
	They will probably, as they got Clarkson to apologize in the past, they're probably going to call him on the carpet and make him do penance to his LGBT masters and all their bunting.
	So, he says, the person writing this says, oh, Jeremy Clarkson is right.
	This person is from the UK. He said, not too far from my home is a Tesco grocery store, superstore.
	And at the entrance, they have all kinds of pride colors and a poster that says, Standing Proud Together, we support the LGBTQ plus community and charities all year round, creating a safe space for everyone every day.
	Oh, really? Is it safe to say I'm not going to use your pronouns?
	No. Again, there's no tolerance there.
	And this has been the longest situation for the longest time.
	They have no intention...
	To tolerate what you say.
	They demand that you celebrate what they do.
	There was no such board at the store last year, but the Tesco Superstore in Carnforth, Cumbria, where I used to shop regularly, did display one.
	And so he said, so I wrote a letter to the Tesco headquarters, and I said, I'm writing to raise concerns about the prominent sign promoting the pride movement, which I saw today at the entrance to the Tesco store in Camforth.
	I am a regular customer and a club card holder.
	Why is Tesco promoting a controversial neo-Marxist ideological political movement at this store?
	Would the company have shown a sign promoting Brexit or remain during the 2016 referendum?
	If the reason for promoting Pride is because Tesco wishes to commend the work done by LGBT charities, that surely raises the question of why the store does not show prominent signs with a Christian or Islamic symbol commending the charitable works done in the name of these world religions.
	because as he knows LGBT is a religion.
	As a result of what I saw today I intend to transfer my custom to Aldi.
	This is sad for me because the staff at the Carnforth store are usually friendly and efficient.
	He said Tesco did not respond to any of the points that are raised in this letter.
	I got back a...
	Response is that everyone is welcome at Tesco.
	We support LGBTQ plus equality and accept people without exception.
	We're proud to be part of Pride again this year and will continue to strive to ensure that everyone, except Christians, feel welcome.
	Because if you don't celebrate this, you're labeled a hateful individual who needs to be purged, punished somehow.
	Evangelical Christian campaigners Voice for Justice UK this week published a report on how LGBT ideology is marginalizing Orthodox Christians, which is all the more relevant for being published during Pride Month.
	They said while there should be no hierarchy in the list of protected characteristics under the Equality Act of 2010, this appears to be contradicted by reality.
	It appears that there is a hierarchy of protected characteristics, with all things LGBT plus at the top, and ethnicity slightly below that.
	He quoted press release from a conservative MP running for office who said, Christianity is the cornerstone for so many of the values that we take for granted.
	If it were not for Christianity, our tolerance, our diversity, our freedom of conscience, and our love for our neighbor would become a thing of the past.
	And they have exploited this, by the way.
	I'm not reading from him.
	I'm just saying that tolerance...
	Freedom of conscience has been exploited and turned upon us in intolerant and hateful demands.
	And so we don't need to tolerate this anymore.
	And that's why you're seeing, especially the younger people, you know, doing burnouts on these things, grabbing the flags and stomping on them.
	They understand. They have seen this shoved down with intolerance down their throats.
	And they're even more sick of it than the adults because they've gotten it worse than we have.
	This report needs to be circulated widely among those working in human resources, those responsible for education as well as employers, church leaders, civil servants, and those responsible for policymaking.
	We all need to wake up to the attack on Christianity in our society before it turns into something even more sinister.
	This report is a vital step in sounding the alarm, the report that the Voice for Freedom had.
	And so, you think that this country is any different than the UK or Canada, anywhere else?
	HHS is now being sued over a rule that requires healthcare providers to perform mutilation.
	They call it gender transition.
	And so if you're a doctor or a nurse or something, you're working in a hospital, and it has to be paid for by the states as well.
	If the states don't do that, there's going to be some severe financial penalties.
	Again, you see how the federal government dictates things to people for which they have no authority under the Tenth Amendment.
	If they aren't given the authority specifically for something, they don't have it.
	That's what the Tenth Amendment says.
	And yet, how do they get around that?
	They bribe and blackmail people with this fiat currency from the Federal Reserve, as always.
	That is their super weapon domestically, not just internationally.
	That almighty dollar is the sword of Damocles hanging over everybody's head that takes it.
	And so, just as we saw during the pandemic, and just as I have said over and over again, Trump was the one who ran it.
	Trump had all responsibility for it because Trump released the money with that Friday the 13th executive order.
	and because he was a president and they were bribing people then Biden blackmailed people.
	The attorneys general of Montana and Texas on Tuesday filed a lawsuit against Javier Becerra, secretary of DHS, or not DHS, HHS, over a rule that says that states must pay for gender transition procedures through the Medicaid programs and it requires health care providers who receive federal funding to perform such procedures even if those procedures are in violation of state law.
	And even if those procedures are in violation of these doctors and nurses' conscience, their religion.
	And so it is right for Montana and Texas AGs to sue over this.
	My question is, why didn't they ever do this over the vaccines?
	Ken Paxton in Texas, he never sued over the demands from the Biden administration that you are going to have all your doctors and nurses get the vaccine or we're going to take your CMS money, your Medicare, Medicaid money away from you.
	He didn't sue over that.
	Why not? That was clearly a violation of people's conscience.
	But the only thing that Paxton did that I could see It was back in December of 2023, this last December, he put out a lawsuit saying that Pfizer had engaged in fraud over their claims of efficacy for the vaccine.
	That's it. That's all he could think of.
	Four years after the fact.
	Absolutely amazing.
	But again, this is wrong.
	He is on the right side on this lawsuit.
	So, glad that he's doing that along with the Montana AG. The rule explicitly provides non-discrimination protections based on gender identity and sexual orientation and categorically prohibits denial of gender-affirming care.
	Again, these totalitarian dictators in Washington.
	Demanding this, and the only tool that they've got to make this happen is money.
	They can make this happen if we want the money badly enough.
	Because if they do this lawsuit and they say, no, they can remove the money from you, you know what's going to happen in Texas and in Montana.
	They'll go, oh, shucks.
	Okay, well, we'll have to do it because one thing we can't give up is federal money.
	We can give away our conscience.
	We can mutilate people when we know that it's not in their best interest either.
	But, you know, if you're going to take away my money, all right, you got me.
	I'll do it.
	You know, that's where it's going to head.
	If they don't win in court, they'll do it for the money.
	The AGs of Montana and Texas object to what they call in their complaint a devastatingly drastic social change.
	They said it effectively forces taxpayers in those states to pay for controversial drugs and experimental surgeries for people seeking so-called gender transition, mutilation.
	They say these procedures inflict permanent harm.
	Of course they do. It's mutilation.
	We are suing to stop the Biden administration from withholding federal health care funds to force medical professionals to perform these experimental and dangerous procedures.
	But they didn't do that for the injections.
	Isn't that interesting? And like I said, if a court says, no, they can do that, they can blackmail you over this stuff, all right, okay, I'll do it.
	The Supreme Court... The Supreme Court rejected a challenge to Biden's FDA to sell abortion pills, essentially, over-the-counter without any medical intervention or examination.
	And this is, folks, when they talk about abortion and say this is about women's health, this shows the ultimate hypocrisy of that statement.
	That's a couple of slogans that they got.
	Number one, this is my body, my choice.
	Well, we saw the hypocrisy of that when the same people were demanding that everybody else get a vaccine.
	That everybody else, social distance, wear the mask, you name it.
	All of the pandemic stuff.
	That was my body.
	And my choice was I wasn't going to comply with any of that stuff.
	And they hated that.
	They wanted that punished. They have no tolerance for people who are actually making their own health decisions.
	They have no tolerance for real bodily integrity because the babies are not the mother's body.
	Somebody else is being killed.
	And then we see the hypocrisy of this.
	Oh, we're doing this for women's health.
	Well, you give them this abortion pill without an examination.
	The examinations are conducted because they want to see the size of the baby amongst many other common sense things.
	If you really are concerned about the care of the mother, these types of things should be done under a doctor's care.
	And especially if the baby is too far along.
	It can kill the mother.
	They don't care. All they want is abortion.
	If the mother dies, hey, they've got a bonus there, right?
	Because it's all about depopulation.
	And so they brought a lawsuit, several doctors and others brought a lawsuit to the Supreme Court because the FDA was, again, not doing its job.
	It's supposed to be there to examine the safety and the efficacy of these various procedures, which we've seen them throw that out the door with vaccines, with impunity.
	Nobody took anything to the Supreme Court about that for the most part, but they did take it for this.
	And it was ruled unanimously, unanimously, that the plaintiffs lack standing to sue to stop the law.
	Kavanaugh wrote the unanimous decision in this.
	He said, here, the plaintiff doctors and the medical associations are unregulated parties who seek to challenge the FDA's regulation of others.
	He said, FDA's regulations apply to doctors who are prescribing mephipristone.
	I guess I like to call it mephistopheles.
	I think that's a better way to pronounce this.
	And to pregnant women taking mephistopheles.
	But the plaintiff, doctors, and medical associations do not prescribe or use it.
	And FDA has not required the plaintiffs to do anything or to refrain from doing anything.
	Now, I don't like the fact that these people, I don't like the fact that the FDA and Biden administration is allowing a very dangerous pill.
	His intention is to kill the baby, but may also kill the mother, to be sold and used without any medical oversight.
	I think that's criminal.
	However, for these people to stop it, I think legally this is the correct decision.
	I think it's one of the reasons why the Supreme Court was unanimous in it.
	I don't like the outcome, but the court decision I think is legally correct.
	The problem is the FDA. And how do you control the FDA? Well, Mike Johnson, who claims that he's pro-life, could do something about it.
	But they continue to fund the FDA. Just like they continue to fund the NIH and the NIAID and all the rest of this stuff, they have done nothing.
	They hold hearings about, oh, we don't like these experiments being done about gain of function and all the rest of the stuff, but they continue to fund it.
	They continue to fund all these organizations that lied to us, all these organizations that pushed these horrible vaccines, the FDA that allowed it, the CDC even.
	They don't do anything to restrict the funding of any of these organizations.
	And so that's where the problem is.
	There are ways that this should be handled.
	And these people in desperation, I understand what they're doing in desperation because Mike Johnson, this phony, won't do anything about it in Congress.
	I understand why they did it. But again, that's not, you know, they don't, they're not being required to do something.
	They're not being prohibited themselves from doing anything.
	So they don't have any standing.
	Plaintiffs do not prescribe, manufacture, sell, or advertise Mephistopheles or sponsor a competing drug.
	The plaintiffs suffer no direct monetary injuries from the FDA's actions relaxing regulation of Mephistopheles.
	Because the plaintiffs do not use Mephistopheles, they obviously can suffer no physical injuries from the FDA's actions relaxing its regulation.
	But here's the reality that is being ignored by the Republicans in Congress as they do one show trial after the other and do absolutely nothing about any issue.
	One woman who's outside the Supreme Court shared her story of being harmed.
	She said, I was utterly alone, terror-stricken, certain that I would die.
	In fact, I wanted death to come to relieve me from the agony that felt never-ending.
	She took the Mephistopheles.
	My body shook violently with tremors, and I sweated profusely.
	I cried in agony, for I'd never experienced such physical attacks on my body.
	I was petrified and completely alone, not knowing how long this would last.
	So we don't need any medical oversight or anything with this.
	She said, I didn't end my life when I had my chemical abortion, but I wanted to.
	I wanted the pain to be over because it was all so unbearable and disorienting.
	Had the means been available to end my life, I may have done it.
	That's the reality. And so, you know, we can talk about the legal aspects of it, we can talk about how it can be done, but the reality is, folks, that nothing is going to be fixed in Washington.
	You know, it's about your relationship with God, your relationship with your family, things that can be accomplished in your community and your state.
	Washington is set against us.
	Washington is an occultic cult.
	That's all it is at this point.
	I mean, just look at these Reawaken America tours and all the rest of this stuff.
	Michelle Obama, thank you very much for the tip.
	And Doug Elug, thank you as well.
	KWD 68.
	I saw one city that installed colored bricks, so the crosswalks are permanent.
	Isn't that great?
	Comments about the guy dressed up like Mario Kart.
	And rolling the roller that doesn't have any paint on it.
	Jim Z7 says, putting on the clear coat...
	WD68. Satan always twists.
	The rainbow was a covenant from God.
	Always twisting and fools always falling for it.
	That's right. God's saying, I won't destroy the world again with a flood.
	But his judgment remains.
	He will destroy it in other ways.
	And we are storing up wrath, aren't we?
	Soker Joe 2, the rainbow is God's promise not to destroy the world again with flood.
	Next time he will use fire.
	Yeah.
	Vex the first, they are celebrating Satan's specific sin, pride.
	They got him cast out of heaven.
	Even an atheist with half a brain wouldn't think that to be wise.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	You know, that's what I said before, you know, pride in and of itself is a sin.
	And so they are proud of their sin.
	And I said for the longest time, I said, you know, that is what is so strange about this, is that how many people...
	People who are adulterers have an adulterer pride parade.
	It's like, oh, wait a minute, Trump.
	He's proud of his adultery.
	He's proud of, I guess, things that he considers to be winning.
	He won over all of his ex-wives.
	I guess at one point he did have to win them over.
	I guess he flashed his wallet at them or something like that.
	That's how he won them over.
	And then he tried to keep his wallet as he ditched them.
	Faked world order.
	Looks like Nazi Germany-level propaganda.
	Gay flags everywhere. Yeah, Dustin Helm.
	Flag day is flag day.
	Well, yeah, we took the L on that one.
	Nancy Chambers, I'm flying the American flag upside down in protest.
	Vets did not serve or die for the LGBTQ flag.
	That's right. Yeah, today being flag day.
	Jason Barker. Hey, Jason, are they going to come back after the month is over to clean up the paint?
	Yeah. We're going to have an army of pickup trucks out there to turn it black again with tire marks.
	Dustin Helm. They vandalize the street with rainbow graffiti.
	That's where the real vandalism was.
	Jason Barker. We should go paint over the pride flags with the Betsy Ross flag so we can really trigger them.
	Octo spook. American government stands on the bedrock of God and Christianity, but you wouldn't know that today.
	Yeah, that's not this American government.
	That was another American government once upon a time.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break.
	When we come back, I want to talk a little bit about what Adobe is doing.
	It's very similar to what a lot of these technocrats who seek to monetize every aspect of our life and use it to control, to manipulate us, to treat us like cattle.
	And they've been doing this for the longest time.
	Why should we be surprised that they treated us like cattle in 2020?
	Why should we be surprised at what they're doing to the cattle now?
	We'll be right back.
	Hang on just one second.
	I'm going to be a little bit more specific.
	Alright, we're going to talk about surveillance.
	And of course, it's not just our software on our computers.
	It's what's going on in our cars, on our phones.
	We're being surveilled everywhere, especially as we drive.
	There are some special apps that are set up to do that.
	Some of the cars do that. Some people don't realize that apps that they would not even think would be reporting on you to the insurance company are.
	And we're going to talk about which apps those are in just a moment.
	Before we do, real quickly, I want to thank people who have contributed to us on Zelle.
	And if you would like to find out how you can support the program You can go to the David night show comm and it has all the different links there where you can first of all find the program both audio and video formats and Also where you can support us and It's been a while. I didn't we had at the very end of the month. We Had a lot of people who came in at the last minute We had Mary Ellen Moore who did a matching funds on it, and
	We had Mary Ellen Moore who did a matching funds on it.
	we thanked everybody for the matching contributions on here, but We had a lot of people who came in at the last minute.
	And we thanked everybody for the matching contributions on here.
	But the matching contributions on Zelle, we did not talk about that.
	So I want to mention some of the people at the very tail end of May who helped us with that.
	And I'm just going to read the first name and last name initial.
	Ronald H. David R. J. H. Scott L. Kevin H. Amy B. Mary Ellen Moore, of course, is there as the matching funds.
	Armin O. Ralph M. Stacey A. Raymond G. Kelly K. Kimberly M. Kevin M. Matthew M. Sylvia D. And Manny D. Those are the people who helped us at the tail end of last month.
	And then the people so far this month who have contributed in June...
	Gregory I, Michael L, William W, Maurice W, Adam D, Regalio J, Kimberly M, Terry M, Susan L, Kenneth C, Majid Z, Gretchen C, Susan L again. We have a lot of people.
	We have we we picked up as a matter of fact Terry M was a new contributor.
	Thank you very much, and that was very generous.
	I appreciate that.
	But we see the same people over and over again, just a few people who support this program and make it available to all of you.
	And so we really do appreciate that.
	Kenneth C., Majed Z., Gretchen C. again, Susan L. again, Sean S., Felicia H., Jose G., Manny D., Susan L. again, Jared U., Kenneth C., and Susan L.
	again.
	Thank you so much.
	And as I said, there's four different times from Susan L. I really do appreciate that.
	But everybody, we really do appreciate that.
	And thank you. If you would like to support the program and if your bank supports that, Zelle is maybe the easiest.
	Well, it is of all the electronic ways.
	It is the one that does not have any fees.
	There's no transfer fees to it.
	All the rest of them have fees.
	And so if your bank supports that, that is a great one to use.
	But we've got a lot of different ones at thedavidknightshow.com.
	And, of course, if you want to send something by mail, that's appreciated as well.
	And that is also no special fees on that.
	Let's talk a little bit about surveillance.
	Is your driving being secretly scored?
	Well, yes, says the New York Times.
	And we've known about this.
	We've known that they've been putting this into the...
	The cars that are more and more connected.
	And yet, a lot of people didn't realize that this information was already being sent over to insurance companies.
	And people were getting dinged with this.
	General Motors had a lawsuit.
	And because of the lawsuit, they stopped collecting that information and sending it over to LexisNexis.
	But there's a lot of smartphone apps that you may not realize are doing it.
	Apps like MyRadar.
	You know, looking for weather report.
	It's a weather forecast. It's not looking at police radar.
	It's looking at weather forecasts.
	Or a gas buddy. You know, it's got your location.
	And it's supposed to help you save cost on gas.
	So you tell it, you know, this is a grade of gas.
	I'm looking what are people reporting the prices are in various places around here.
	But anything that looks at your GPS stuff can also make judgments about how you're driving.
	And are you going the speed limit in that particular spot?
	Because they can overlay the speed limit everywhere now.
	How fast are you stopping?
	How fast are you starting?
	These features that are anytime that there's any motion or GPS information from your phone, these apps are reporting it to an analytics company called Arati.
	And this was founded by Allstate.
	We were laughing about this the other day.
	And my son said, yeah, just like a big brother, Allstate is there.
	Not like a good neighbor anymore.
	It's a big brother. It's your Stasi.
	It's your neighbor reporting you to the Stasi.
	So Allstate, the insurance company in 2016, creates this other party.
	And then they paid for the access from this data, from, you know, like an app that looks at the weather or an app that tells you GasBuddy, that tells you what the gas prices are.
	They pay them for this data.
	You know, all these apps that are free, well, you are the product.
	And this is what they're collecting about you.
	Yeah, I'd like to know just how fuel efficient I'm being.
	Powered by Arity, it says, when you log on to it.
	And then they agree to Arity's privacy statement, which is to say you don't have any privacy if you do this.
	This agreement is in small gray font under a big red button labeled Join the Drive.
	The company then sells this access to the driving scores of tens of millions of people.
	Auto insurance companies can request a person's individual driving score, which is delivered instantly, according to Allstate's website.
	The scores look at drivers' performance behind the wheel, how often they brake suddenly or speed or use their phones.
	According to RIT. Yeah, even look at that.
	Of course, it doesn't count if you've got these new displays.
	This isn't just Tesla, which only has like an iPad at the center.
	That's their only instrumentation.
	They don't have any other instruments there.
	But, you know, I've found it to be the worst design possible.
	To have to try to drive while using, and it's not just the Tesla, but I've rented cars from GM and others in years past where there's something there that you've got to try to do by pinching and dragging and getting your finger on it as opposed to having some kind of a tactile knob or a button or something like that that you can push.
	And so you're trying to do this and looking down and away from the road.
	That is really dangerous.
	And yet they don't give people tickets for that.
	I find that to be far more distracting and dangerous than using a phone while I'm driving.
	But of course, it'll tell them if you're using the phone as well.
	So they score all of this.
	And then Arity pays GasBuddy for this stuff.
	And then Arity sells it to other insurance companies.
	And then the insurance companies charge you.
	Not all insurers are using Airdy's driving data.
	Most of them are, but a spokesperson for Geico and for us, a, a said they collected driving behavior only from people who had downloaded a dedicated smartphone app to track how they drove.
	So they've got apps for that.
	And I guess, you know, they, they bribe people.
	This is the way it's going to operate.
	They're going to say, well, your insurance rates got to go up.
	And, uh, but you know, you can get a discount if you give us all the information about your driving.
	If you limit yourself to a certain amount of driving and that type of thing.
	So the basically will blackmail us with higher rates, but at the moment you have to, uh, you have to voluntarily sign up for that.
	They're not doing it in a deceptive roundabout way like Allstate and the rest of the insurance companies.
	How does this work out?
	Well, last year, Rob Lutheran, a tech executive in Texas, got an email from Toyota.
	Good news, Robert.
	You've been identified by Toyota Insurance as a safe driver.
	He said, so what is all this about?
	He started investigating it, and he found out after a month of phone calls, emails, and data privacy requests to Toyota and to this Connected Analytic Services, which was there, it turned out that that was just an insurance data broker.
	He got a report in January that detailed the previous six months' driving of his SUV. And he said it had a couple different parts.
	How many times had his car's safety systems been engaged?
	And the number of times that he had braked and accelerated at a rate, quote, that insurers view as harder than necessary for defensive driving.
	There was also a Microsoft Excel file with time-stamped list of every offending event, the latitude and longitude for where they occurred, and in the speeding tab, there were more than 200 second-by-second entries for the handful of drives during which he had exceeded 85 miles per hour,
	because I guess they realized that's the maximum speed limit anywhere, but they could easily map The speed limit to the particular spot where he was.
	And in Atlanta, speed cameras have issued $300,000 to $500,000 worth of bogus tickets.
	This is what's going to be happening with all the surveillance stuff.
	We're still, as I mentioned the other day, we're still getting occasionally about once every couple of months.
	We get some garbage from Texas toll, even though we're not there.
	Haven't been there for years.
	They'll claim that we're driving on some road or something.
	And it's new stuff. It's not, you didn't pay this, you know, payback.
	No. And it's such a hassle.
	You wind up spending an hour getting these people to remove this thing.
	But I'm not going to pay them the dollar.
	And if you don't pay them the $1.50 or whatever it is, then it starts snowballing rapidly.
	Innocent drivers in Atlanta improperly issued $75 tickets for speeding through a school zone.
	What they were doing was they would have a school zone where they, during school hours when it's flashing, it'd be 25 miles an hour.
	Otherwise, it's 35 miles an hour.
	But it wasn't looking at the time that people were driving through.
	So if you drove through there when school was not in session, when the kids were not coming and going from school, when the yellow light was not flashing, the speed limit was 35.
	But they always treated it as if the speed limit was 25 and issued $75 tickets to people.
	$4,500 tickets.
	Speeding tickets since last November.
	They're going to refund those.
	But again, once we turn all this stuff over to AI, there's no end to it.
	And now, as we look at other...
	This is the issue with artificial intelligence and all this stuff.
	It's going to be constant eyes on everything that you're doing and making judgments about what you're doing.
	Who are they to say they're not in the car?
	They're just looking at these raw issues about how quickly you turned or put on the brakes and that type of stuff.
	They're looking, issuing these speeding tickets without being there, not even paying attention to the time of day.
	And so now Photoshop has new terms that are going to require you to allow them to view everything that you create.
	Everything you create.
	And they reserve the right to deactivate your software if you make stuff that they don't like.
	This is the precursor To the CCPA, the Chinese Communist Party of America.
	No, actually, that's the Coalition for Content, Providence, and Authentication.
	In other words, who created this content?
	I want to know. And we're going to have to authenticate this content.
	And if we don't like what you're doing, you're drawing pictures of Joe Biden or Fauci.
	We don't like that. We're just going to shut you down on Photoshop.
	Fortunately, I've got an old version of Photoshop, which, you know, long ago, they went from selling Photoshop to leasing it where you don't own it, where they would do updates whenever they feel like it.
	It drives Travis nuts when they do these updates because they're not always available.
	Without bugs, and they'll just arbitrarily move the interface around and things like that.
	But now, if you're doing something that they don't like, they'll just shut you down.
	And that's the whole point.
	This Coalition for Content, Providence, and Authentication is not just the software companies like Adobe, but it's also the CPU companies.
	And so they're going to be marketing everything that you do.
	And they can review it later, you know, if their media partners, you've got BBC, the New York Times, other ones like that are their media partners.
	So if the BBC and the New York Times don't like what you're saying about Fauci, if they don't like your text, if they don't like your meme, if they don't like your video, if they don't like your audio, well, then they, you've got your mark there, you are identified and And they can shut this thing down, and so this is the beginning of it, coming from Adobe.
	As one person pointed out, well, as all this is being talked about at Adobe, somebody said, what are the odds?
	General Flynn is on the advisory board of Adobe.
	Well, you mean this guy who is Mr.
	Maga? You mean the guy who's been pushing LGBT transgenderism from its inception, that General Flynn?
	You mean the guy who goes around to Christian churches with Reawaken America and leads these rubes and prayers to ascended masters?
	Yeah, that Michael Flynn, who's there at Adobe...
	And he is pushing, look, let me just say to the audience, I know they've got people who are in the John Birch Society, people with the New American and stuff.
	New American has had up now for over, I think it's a month or two, they have at the top of their page an interview they did with Michael Flynn.
	Has the John Birch Society and the New American become so lack of any discernment, understanding, background of the people that they are cheering, that they would do something like this?
	I mean, if the New American keeps that up there much longer, I'm just going to remove them from my list of places I even look at.
	And you can keep the magazine that you send every month if you don't get some discernment about who this guy is.
	What does it matter with them?
	I mean, I got no personal grudge with Flynn.
	As a matter of fact, I defended him when he was attacked at the very beginning, and I criticized Trump.
	I said, Trump shows absolutely no loyalty to his subordinates.
	And, of course, that is true as well.
	Nothing has changed about that.
	We saw that exhibited through the rest of the administration that he had there.
	But I thought that Flynn was unfairly prosecuted for that stuff.
	And when the election was going, Flynn had spoken very candidly about the fraud that was happening in some of these wars and how we were running both sides and how we were giving arms to the side that we were fighting and that type of stuff.
	That was welcome information.
	But of course, somebody who is not on your side will get on your side by giving you that information.
	That's the classic intelligence move.
	And he was part of the intelligence community.
	And so the question is that now that he's established himself as a victim, now that he's established his street creds with the MAGA crowd, he can mislead them into all kinds of satanic, occultic stuff.
	He can be on the Adobe advisory board.
	As a matter of fact, he makes big bucks there as well.
	So again, Photoshop requires that you allow them to view everything that you create.
	They reserve the right to deactivate it.
	And he's right there as part of that.
	Even as we see that happening, you know, there's the big back and forth this week.
	Elon Musk, very upset about the fact that Apple was going to put chat GPT on their iPhones.
	And the market was not very excited about that either, because, again, Apple is admitting that they don't have the technology.
	They've got to depend on somebody else to do this.
	And then when you look at which of these chat GPT programs it was, it was the 4.0 version.
	Which, as we saw with them a couple of weeks ago, it has the AI connected to the camera, and it can make a lot of very quick assumptions and correct assumptions about what's going on.
	As the guy was saying, so what's going on here?
	And he shows the camera, waves the camera around so it can see the room.
	Says, oh, it looks like you're recording a video or something like that.
	And, you know, it can make some judgments about that.
	It can match these patterns to other images really quickly.
	But Elon Musk said, this is nothing but a spy device.
	And he said, you're not bringing that into my facilities.
	So he says, if Apple continues down this path, then people who have this chat GPT-40 on their phones, they will have to put their devices into a Faraday cage before they can come into our facilities.
	And that's the way that we should understand that as well.
	Listen to what he has to say about that.
	He understands the technology.
	He says they are selling you down the river.
	And he is going to ban these devices.
	He says visitors will have to check their Apple devices at the door where they will be stored in a Faraday cage.
	So they can't wirelessly connect to anything.
	And so that's exactly what we should understand.
	We're going to take a quick break and we're going to come back and take a look before Gerald joins us at some more technology that is making some things that people thought would last forever Suddenly, obsolete.
	I'm Marty. Thank you very much for the tip.
	He says, how about drones bombing prideful crosswalks with paint balloons?
	That might be harder for them to find out the ID of a drone than it is for them to look at the license tag of the truck or something.
	Sprumford, I did a double take when I read that women can get these abortion pills without a physician in many places.
	Absolutely right. And the purpose of that is for the woman's health to make sure the baby is not too far along.
	They say you're not to use this if the baby is beyond a certain age or a certain size.
	Well, you can't determine that as a woman.
	KWD68, the traffic reports now use phone data to show traffic delays.
	Isn't that nice?
	Yes. And the question is, that's been going on for a very long time.
	The question is, is it truly anonymized or not?
	And that's what we, you know, really don't understand or know.
	VexTheFirst says, I'm keeping my 06 with no kill switch until it rots from underneath me.
	That's right. It's a problem for a dump.
	Most new cars have a black box now.
	Probably do. I don't know, since I'm not in the market for a new car.
	We've got... Most of our cars are 12, 13 years old.
	So, yeah, that's a...
	I guess probably.
	I only use Adobe Offline, says Nadlander.
	Well, the problem is going to be that...
	Some of that is, they're still going to be able to look at that.
	And still, with the Coalition for Content, Providence, and Authentication, if you put up something publicly and they don't like what you put up, they will trace it back down to you.
	So that is coming.
	Texas, JFK Mindset.
	Why are politics involved in art platform?
	Because it's totalitarianism.
	How does that enhance creativity?
	I'm cool with the company increasing surveillance to create better features, but politics and software is silly.
	It's surveillance is what it is.
	He says also, Photoshop should have a waiver alert.
	See, that's the way all these things are.
	Who would think that your weather app is going to report on your driving and that's going to go to an insurance company that will then raise your rates?
	And they'll go back and say, yeah, well, we warned you.
	It's going to ARD or ARD or whatever.
	You should have looked that up.
	Jason Barker, that's why I save all my old software setup files.
	Yeah. Snapshot by Progressive is there to find ways to charge you more for bad driving behaviors.
	Yeah. We're gradually moving into this.
	We're going to take a quick break. We'll be right back and we'll talk about some other tech that is rapidly changing The common man you They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News,
	you'll love the Classic Hits Channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APS radio.com They're all I need to please me They can't stimulate to tease me They won't leave in the night I've no fear that they might deserve Well,
	it seems like everything in this life that we think is going to be there forever disappears.
	Wealth is fleeting. Diamonds are not forever.
	That was the slogan not only of a Bond film, but also of the cartel monopoly.
	That has been rigging this market for a very long time.
	And now people have come up with the lab-grown diamonds, and it's been driving down the price somewhat.
	It is also getting a bigger and bigger market share.
	What's interesting is that even, you know, qubit zirconium, they can't really tell.
	Like, there's a very limited test that you can do with it, kind of a scratch test on the The bottom of the thing to see if it's cubic zirconium.
	But for the most part, it's not really any different.
	I've always looked at things like diamonds.
	I thought it's kind of interesting.
	It's like somebody goes into a foreign country and says they're buying something and they just hold out a hand.
	I've seen people do this, hold out their hand with a bunch of money and say, you know, you figure out how much this is and just take what you need, you know?
	And that's the way people buy a lot of jewelry and diamonds and things like that as well.
	But that is starting to come to an end because of lab-grown diamonds.
	And... The percentage of people who are buying the lab-grown stuff has gone up last year to 18%.
	Prior to that, in 2017, just five years earlier, it was only 2%.
	But things are on the way.
	A new technique is on the way that is going to change this even more rapidly.
	What they've been doing with these lab-grown diamonds is still using a tremendous amount of heat and pressure and other things like that that mimic the way diamonds are formed in the earth.
	Natural diamonds Are formed in the Earth's mantle.
	2700 degrees Fahrenheit.
	And a lot of pressure.
	And so what they would do is they would do this in the lab.
	Create extremely high pressure, high temperature growth.
	They would do it in molten and liquid metals like iron or something.
	And they would use a seed diamond to begin it.
	And then grow out from there.
	However, they've got a new approach.
	That does it at room temperature and room pressure and it does it in 15 minutes.
	This has not even hit the marketplace in terms of application.
	So people are still doing it.
	If they're doing lab-grown stuff, they're still using a tremendous amount of energy and that type of thing to do this.
	But this is something that has been discovered and published in South Korea.
	Just kind of a heads up, if somebody's got some expensive diamonds, you might...
	You might want to get rid of those and replace them because this is about to be completely disrupted in that marketplace.
	By the way, I've got a couple of comments here about Photoshop.
	Don't frag me, bro. It isn't about fostering creativity.
	It's about controlling the content of the art because art is used to mock and to rebel against authority.
	Yeah, it's a speech issue.
	It absolutely is. And Steve Swan.
	Thank you for writing this, Steve.
	David, you're not going to get donations if you don't ever ask for donations.
	You hardly ever ask. Well, again, we would appreciate your donations, and we're getting off to a slow start again this month because I don't push this enough, but we really would appreciate it if you'd like to support us.
	Again, Zelle is a great way if your bank supports it.
	But you can see all the different ways that you can support us through Cash App.
	We've got the address that is there.
	If you'd like to sign up on Subscribestar, that is something that helps us a great deal because once you sign up, it just goes on a regular basis.
	But of course, you can also subscribe on Rumble and some of these other places.
	We're going to set it up where you'll be able to do donations and subscriptions on the Thank you, Steve, for the reminder. I want to talk a little bit about what is happening in terms of biometric retail payment.
	Just as we look at these things are rolling out gradually, you know, when you look at the insurance companies monitoring the way you're driving through your weather app or something like that in California, they are moving in the direction that we've always said that they're going to do.
	Eric Peters and I have been talking about this for years.
	It's like, yeah, they're going to tax you by the mile.
	They have to do that.
	When they go to electric vehicles, there's no way for them to tax that electricity specifically.
	So what they're going to do is, because you can charge up in a lot of different places, not just in places where they've got their stations.
	So they're going to have to track people, and that's going to be their excuse to tax everybody by the mile.
	And, of course, they'll probably tax the people who have fuel capacity Welcome to my show!
	And they're doing the same thing in terms of taking away cash and financial transaction privacy.
	MasterCard, as in master-slave relationship, they have launched their biometric retail payment system in Europe.
	They're using Poland as a testing ground, and their slogans are very creepy.
	Buy with your eyes, pay with your glance.
	Ha! It's like a silent auction or something, or you just nod your head and you bought it.
	As a matter of fact, they've got to be very careful with it.
	If you look at the thing while somebody else is running it through, they said you might get charged for what they're buying.
	After running pilot tests in Brazil and parts of the Asia Pacific for roughly two years, they're now rolling this out in Europe.
	They picked Poland.
	And they said they thought it was because the people in Poland were gullible, is essentially what they're saying.
	They said, we chose Poland as the first European country to pilot the program because of its receptiveness to new technologies.
	According to their survey, four out of five Polish people say they use or have used biometric technology, while among the 18- to 25-year-old category, almost all are familiar with using biometrics.
	They said Poland was one of the first countries where contactless payments with MasterCards were introduced.
	So, again, they tout this as, hey, this is great.
	You don't have to pull out your wallet.
	You don't have to pull anything.
	It's just we make it so easy.
	You won't have to own anything, not even a card.
	It's going to be wonderful.
	And it's not just MasterCard.
	It's Visa as well. And as one person pointed out, here's the big issue with it, with the biometric stuff.
	You think it doesn't matter? Well, if you lose your card, your card gets stolen or your password gets stolen or something like that, which is that kind of stuff is getting hacked all the time.
	And the biometric stuff is going to get hacked all the time as well.
	Pentagon gets hacked. The CIA gets hacked.
	The NSA gets hacked.
	Everybody gets hacked.
	Everything has been hacked.
	If they hack your biometric stuff, what do you do?
	You can't get a new face.
	You can't get a new fingerprint or palm print.
	You can get a new password, you can get a new card, but that creates all kinds of issues, doesn't it?
	And there are some states that have put in some protection for that very reason, in Illinois.
	And in those areas, they've got people who are filing lawsuits.
	So how do we stop this kind of thing?
	As usual, if you understand where globalism is going...
	You can stop it at the local level.
	You can put in some state rules that say we're not going to have this kind of biometric stuff because if it gets stolen, it's a real problem for people.
	And so if you understand where this is headed, you understand the implications of this and how it's going to be abused, misused, stolen, then you can get some state legislators to stand for that.
	And otherwise, you are standing for being a victim of all this stuff.
	We're going to take a quick break, join with Gerald Cinti and we'll be right back.
	Music playing.
	Making sense.
	It's Common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Alright, folks, welcome back.
	And joining us now is Gerald Salenti of TrendsJournal.com, and an excellent publication on a weekly basis.
	And if you want to take a look at it, you can go to the website.
	You can see a sample of it, and I would highly recommend it.
	If you want to subscribe to TrendsJournal, you can get 10% off with the code KNIGHT. So, again, TrendsJournal.com.
	Gerald Salenti, a longtime guest of ours.
	And, you know, Gerald, you've always talked...
	About what was going to happen with commercial real estate.
	And, of course, that is happening.
	You've talked about how that is going to extend out to the banks.
	That is happening. And how it is affecting the small businesses there.
	But now, I liked this headline, a restaurant apocalypse is starting to sweep across America.
	That's really what is a knock-on effect.
	It's taken several years since that lockdown for that to happen.
	But it is knocking on, isn't it?
	Oh yeah. The damage that this COVID war has done is incalculable.
	And again, that's not my language.
	All these little slime balls...
	That called it a COVID war, from Trump to Boris Johnson to that arrogant boy over there in California, the first state to lock down Gavin Newsom.
	My daddy worked for Getty.
	Remember the Getty gang?
	What's wrong with you?
	I'm an arrogant little boy.
	And that's the guy they're going to put up for, run for president.
	Yeah. Biden ain't going to run.
	They're going to put that little SOB up there.
	So anyway... So you think Biden is going to drop out?
	They're going to take him out this time?
	Yeah, I think they're going to...
	He's really in bad shape.
	I mean, I was showing stuff from G7. I mean, he's totally out of it.
	He can't speak. He got angry when somebody asked him a question, which was really on topic.
	He wanted to talk about war in Ukraine and everything.
	The guy asked him about that, and he got really angry.
	You know, stick to the plan.
	Do what you're told to do.
	You know, I've got these questions. You're supposed to ask those questions.
	Yeah, so they called it a COVID war.
	The facts are there. We wrote about it in the Trends Journal magazine.
	And by the way, if you subscribe using Knight, it's the grand total of $2.50 a week.
	Yeah, yeah.
	The Wall, S-H-I, with that T in there, journal, $5 a day.
	Hardly get anything of any information anymore.
	New York Times, $4 a day.
	This is $2.50 a week. Last week's 226 pages in the Trends Journal.
	No ads. I can't read 200.
	You read what you want.
	You want to read about geopolitics, you want to read about Israel war, Ukraine war, high-tech science, technocracy.
	If you want to read about...
	Economy, economic updates, and you can listen to it too.
	So anyway. That's great.
	Yeah, it's an online magazine format.
	I love that. And it's in different languages.
	You can choose your language.
	But anyway, to show you how bad the American media is, this is from the toilet paper record, the New York Times, yesterday.
	Excuse me, Monday.
	American newsrooms look across the pond for leaders.
	News businesses in an upheaval.
	Facing financial challenges and political division, several of America's largest news organizations have turned over the reins to editors and Including Will Lewis, a veteran of London's Daily Telegraph and News UK, is now the chief executive of the Washington Post.
	Emma Tucker, formerly of the Sunday Times in the UK, took over the Wall Street Journal last year.
	Mark Thompson, formerly at BBC, became the chairman.
	Of CNN. Yeah, the Cartoon News Network.
	One after another.
	Hmm. That explains something that I thought was interesting earlier.
	I talked about a Wall Street Journal op-ed piece that was praising the welfare state and talking about pre-distribution of wealth.
	Pre-distribution. And I thought, what in the world is this with the Wall Street Journal?
	I said, you know, the Republicans have become the Democrats of my youth, and Democrats have become the full-on open Marxists about this.
	But, you know, pushing this.
	We could achieve the greatness of FDR or of the LGBT... LGBT... LBJ, great society.
	You know, if we would just do this pre-distribution stuff, and it's like, this is a Wall Street Journal pushing welfare and dependency from the government.
	But again, staying on this, there's another article.
	U.S. newsrooms are in trouble.
	Are the British journalists the answer?
	Mm-hmm. I just read to you the Washington Post, CNN, the Wall Street Journal, there are others, Daily Beast, one after another, they're taking all these people from the UK and bringing them over here to run the major media.
	Mm-hmm. So, this is kind of like, maybe it's the second American Revolution?
	Yeah. Because these are the Brits that controlled America when our founding fathers fought against them, and now they're bringing them in to run the major media.
	Yeah. This isn't my language, it's theirs.
	We are the ultimate trophies for American billionaires, said Joanna Coles, the English-born editor, who in April became head of the Daily Beast.
	We are loading up on Brits.
	Yeah. That's who's running our media.
	So, the Trans Journal, nah, nah.
	We're giving you the facts.
	The facts that they never give you, because it's basically, fact you will tell you what to swallow the crap.
	Yeah. That's what's going on here.
	This is terrible.
	And it's not being reported in the context that we're saying.
	Oh yeah, yeah, absolutely.
	It's their values and it's their agenda and they're going to slant this news that way.
	And another part of this I think is, you know, when they bring in British people and they put them on, you know, and they have them speak, when Americans hear a British accent, it automatically adds to the American mind like 10 or 15 IQ points, they think.
	Oh, these people are really smart because they've got a British accent.
	They're not looking at what they're saying, though.
	And it truly is propaganda, and it's how they're rigging this thing.
	And while Fleet Street, which they called back then, where they come from in the UK, has a reputation for fuzzy ethics that goes hand-in-hand with a reader-pleasing willingness.
	Yeah, again, how about...
	Listening to a little piece of nothing garbage scum crap like Piers Morgan.
	All right? Oh, yeah. How idiotic, how ignorant can you be to swallow the crap spewed out of that gutless little clown's mouth?
	Yeah. That's who's taken over American media.
	So we're giving the people with the Trends Journal, they're not getting anywhere else in the world.
	And again, if you don't like it, 30 days you get your...
	Your money is back. So going on to what's going on, and you talked about the real estate crisis.
	It was an article that came out in Bloomberg on June 12th.
	Bus company Coach USA, owner of the Megabus brand and commuter bus lines connecting New York and New Jersey, filed for bankruptcy.
	Ready? Saying it was unable to recover from a decline in ridership brought on by the pandemic.
	This is Bloomberg crap, not brought on by the pandemic, brought on by a bunch of pieces of scum crap that locked down the country.
	Yeah, that's right. And it was called a pandemic by the World War Organization, oh, excuse me, World Health Organization, on March 11th, 2020.
	The COVID war breaks out in China on Chinese Lunar New Year, the year of the rat, in January 2020.
	January, February, March.
	The grand total, look it up, 2,219 people died out of 8 billion.
	And they called it a pandemic.
	So now, going back to this, there's a whole article about Readership has partially recovered, but last year was only about 45% of pre-pandemic levels.
	Okay. It's down 55% for bus travel.
	Wow. Going back to what you said about the restaurants going out of business.
	Yeah. Once upon a time, in big cities, they used to depend on commuters, a lot of businesses, for their business.
	Your office...
	Occupancy rate, meaning how many people are going back to the office, according to Castle Systems with a K, is 50%.
	Ridership, down 55%.
	Can't understand why these businesses are going out of business.
	Now, let's put the big picture, which no one talks about.
	Office building bust.
	you Your office vacancy rate in the United States of the largest cities is around 20%.
	In San Francisco, and again, California was the first to close down, your vacancy rate, meaning vacant, vacant buildings, nobody there, 36%.
	Vacant.
	Yeah. Portland, Oregon, 29%.
	Vacant. New York City, 23%.
	Vacant. Now, the people are not going back to work, and the people that rented the office space don't care about it.
	Because let's say I had 10 floors of an office building, and I got people sitting in these little stupid cubicles.
	I don't see them.
	Yeah, go home. I don't need all this space.
	And I'm the person that works there that's commuting an hour and a half each way back and forth to work.
	I don't want to go to work anymore.
	After they stay home week after week, month after month, year after year with the COVID lockdown.
	So now, there are going to be huge defaults on loans.
	The banks are going to go bust.
	No one is talking about this other than us.
	That's right. It's one of our top trends to 2024.
	Let's go back a year ago.
	Silicon Con Man Valley Bank went bust.
	Signature Bank and First Republic.
	Three banks. Brought down the equity markets big time and brought gold up way high.
	That was three banks?
	Now, even according to the FDIC, You're looking at some 32 banks that are in trouble.
	And other data is showing almost 300 banks in trouble.
	There's going to be huge defaults on these loans.
	And these are interest rate loans, by the way.
	So now the cost of the loan to refinance it is double what it was when they bought the buildings.
	And now they don't have the tenants there to refinance To give them money to pay off their debt.
	No one's talking about this.
	I'm saying maybe a couple, but we're the first to say it.
	Again, we call this back in May of 2020, office building bust.
	That's right. Yeah, you know, they can manipulate the interest rates and everything, but of course, if these people are underwater with this and they got to re-up at a higher interest rate and they start to go down, I mean, are they going to try to do something in terms of kick this can down the road, trying to get them some kind of extension on this so this doesn't break before the election?
	Or do they just don't care anymore about that?
	Is the only thing they care about is the strength of their dollar?
	What do you think is going to happen with that?
	Is that going to be something that could affect the election, you think?
	You know, I thought they were going to lower interest rates in the run-up to the election.
	I was wrong. Because to juice the economy, as they said during the Clinton when he was running for president, that murderous little SOB, it's the economy, stupid.
	Back in 1992. Yeah.
	That was the behind-the-scenes campaign line.
	So I got it wrong because what they're going to do is they're keeping interest rates high and hope to drive down inflation.
	And it ain't going to work.
	Yeah. They could say how low inflation is.
	The people are feeling in their pocketbook.
	That's right. And again, we're writing in the Trends Journal week after week that the survey is coming out and the numbers coming out about how the middle class is suffering so deeply.
	The middle class is shrinking.
	We're nothing more than plantation workers of Slavelandia.
	The big zone everything.
	Again, when we were young guys, there were no private equity groups, no venture capitalists, no hedge funds.
	This didn't exist. There were grocery stores, hardware stores, stationary stores, drug stores.
	Now they're all chains. Mom and pops are dead.
	So they're going to do everything they can to try to prop up the economy.
	And again, I believe that Biden's not going to run.
	slimeball Gavin Newsom in who probably win Because people hate Trump so much. They'll go out and vote for him. Yeah, and not knowing what a piece of scummy is.
	Yeah, that's right Let me ask you before we get into Further into this, you know, we were talking about the pandemic and one of your favorite people Cuomo governor Cuomo both of the Cuomos have Been trying to navigate the lies that they've been caught on from four years ago And you have Chris Cuomo is trying to explain how he was taking ivermectin while he was mocking people who took ivermectin and so forth.
	But now Andrew Cuomo trying to deal with this nursing home thing, and he says that he...
	Didn't sign the order. He doesn't know who did.
	It wasn't the people even that worked for him, Gerald.
	It was somebody that he doesn't even know, way down in the bureaucracy that did this, and he had no idea about that.
	The outright lie.
	We wrote about it as it was happening.
	And of course, the Republicans will do nothing about it.
	He's a lying little piece of scum.
	And again, I want to make this really clear.
	George Collins said it.
	It's one big club and you ain't in it.
	Who is his daddy?
	My daddy was Mario Cuomo.
	I'm little Andy Cuomo.
	I'm little Chris Cuomo.
	Cuomo crap!
	If my daddy wasn't governor, you wouldn't know who I am.
	And I'm renaming the Tappan Zee Bridge after my daddy.
	$30 million to rename the Tappan Zee Bridge.
	You know why? That much?
	They forgot to put the Mario M. Cuomo Bridge.
	They had to take it down because they only had the Governor Mario Cuomo.
	Not the M. Cuomo.
	How about Mother F.U. Cuomo?
	That's what the M's for.
	That's what the M's for. That's what the M's for.
	These are the slime balls running our country.
	These are the little clowns.
	Hey, how about little Georgie Bush?
	A little daddy's boy, jerk, stupid, ignorant piece of scum crime.
	Ninety percent of the people swallowed his crap.
	Look at the poll. Yeah.
	To fight the Afghan war.
	Ninety percent.
	We're going to get that guy Osama Bin Laden?
	Get him alive. And then you've got, when Cuomo is there for the Congress, they've got Elise Stefanik and some other New York Republican Congress people who are dragging him over the cold, and rightfully so.
	Look, I think he needs to be harangued over.
	But all of the alternative conservative press is out there talking about Cuomo, but they won't lay any response.
	And how ridiculous it is that this guy Cuomo wouldn't know anything about what is happening underneath him.
	And yet they excuse this all for Trump, don't they?
	You know, Trump is given a complete pass by the same people who say, well, Cuomo knew and he was responsible and the buck stops.
	No, actually, what Cuomo said was, well, we're getting money from Washington and everything to do this and that.
	And that part of it was right.
	You know, that's the way you do all this stuff, is buy money.
	And just people, I think a lot of the people who are on this Trump bandwagon at the grassroots level have never looked at politics before.
	They have no clue how it operates.
	People have no idea what's going on.
	Yeah, I'm talking to this friend of mine, not a close friend, but a guy.
	I told him we're having a peace rally and blah, blah, blah.
	He said, well, you know, we have to stop Russia.
	I said, listen, man, come on.
	I said, go swallow it. And this guy's a top guy up here in the county.
	And he swallows the garbage coming out of the mouths of these little boys.
	People have no clue what's going on in the world.
	No, no. As a matter of fact, you know, I remember the Cuban Missile Crisis.
	I talked about that a Good bit yesterday at the beginning of the program, and I said, you understand that, you know, the Cuban Missile Crisis wasn't this isolated thing where Khrushchev just decided out of nowhere that he was going to send missiles to Cuba.
	It's because we had put missiles in Turkey, right?
	And so I said, you know, this stuff that's going on down there in Cuba now, they're down there firing missiles and everything, you know, beating their chest.
	But that's happening, and it's escalating because of what we're doing.
	These things have consequences, and they're out there.
	You know, the G7 gets together.
	What do they do? They push war.
	And they steal more stuff from Russia that they confiscate out of the banking system.
	So of course, Russia is leading a move for the rest of the world to abandon the banking system that has been our superpower.
	It's absolutely insane.
	You have to look at this and say, these people can't possibly be this stupid.
	I think this is a deliberate plan to take down this country, because everything they're doing, whether you're looking at their destruction of our energy infrastructure, their bans and their mandates, yes, they're going to make money off of, they're going to sell the products that they're going to mandate that you've got to buy, but they're also destroying the infrastructure at the same time.
	I mean, they're trying to destroy everything.
	I disagree with you.
	They are stupid people.
	Yeah. Well, the people that we see are stupid.
	It's not like they have a great plan.
	These are arrogant, stupid, self-centered pieces of scum.
	Look at the cover of your Trends Journal this week.
	What does it say? U.S.S.A. United Soviet States of America.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Freedom? F you.
	Political parasites in charge.
	Yeah. I agree.
	These are evil, demonic, narcissistic people.
	The only difference between them and the Bloods and the Crips is the way they dress.
	Yep. That's right.
	They're murderers and thieves.
	Right. Yeah, absolutely.
	I remember when we talked about this years ago, you and I, when Trump was coming out with his tax plan, and you were talking about, you know, this is all for the big guys, and it was all for them, and they were buying their own stocks.
	They were not investing it in the companies or anything like that.
	They weren't increasing production.
	And so we've got Trump this week because he understands, the people around him understand, I guess, That everybody is feeling this economic pressure.
	And so he tells the waitresses that he's not going to tax their tips.
	Then he goes to the CEOs and he says, well, you know, he took the tax rate down to 21% for them last time.
	He'll take it down to 20% this time.
	And this is happening as Elon Musk gets $56 billion.
	And as Larry Ellison of Oracle gets $14 billion, and you've got another billionaire, Adelson, who gives Trump $100 million.
	They make the billions of dollars, and they give tips to the politicians of hundreds of millions.
	I mean, it's so corrupt.
	And it's like this trickle-down economics.
	It really is straight out of Josie Wells, isn't it?
	They tell us that it's raining, but they're really pissing down our back.
	And again, they call this a democracy, right?
	Yeah, yeah. And you gotta be rich to run for office and get the money from the rich to do it.
	The numbers are all there. Yeah.
	And again, that's one of our articles this week about how all the CEOs, how much they got from the big corporations that they got in raises compared to the average worker.
	I call ourselves plantation workers.
	Of Slavelandia. Yeah, it just keeps...
	That's all we are. The concentration of wealth is accelerating rapidly.
	And all the stuff about Klaus Schwab, you'll own nothing.
	I mean, we can see that happening now because it's been accelerating and it continues to accelerate at an even faster rate.
	Yep. And it's just going to keep getting worse and worse and worse.
	They just gave this...
	There was an article...
	Let me see if I have it here. Here we go.
	Amtrak... Gave $200,000 bonuses to executives as it lost $1.7 billion.
	Yeah. Well, I mean, look at Musk.
	I mean, he fired about 10% of his working staff and gets himself a $56 billion bonus.
	The passenger rail service reduced its reported losses, blah, blah, blah.
	And they go on to say, Roger Harris, Amtrak's president, received the highest long-term gold payout, about $305,000.
	This is our money.
	Our taxpayer money going to these little slime balls with the lousy Amtrak.
	That shows you... I was on Amtrak.
	I went down to Philadelphia.
	I couldn't... What a joke.
	What a joke.
	Bouncing around in the seats.
	Oh, food! I got these...
	Go to China.
	Hey, how about those...
	Go to Europe.
	You come to America, our rotted third world infrastructure.
	Yeah, it is. As we sent $176 billion already to Ukraine.
	Yeah. As our infrastructure is rotting in front of us.
	Right. How many? $3.8 billion every year going to Israel, the genocide country, one of the richest countries in the world, stealing $4 billion of our money each year, plus what, they just threw them another $26 billion?
	Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.
	As our infrastructure is rotting, the roads are a joke.
	Potholes all over the place.
	Homeless everywhere.
	Yeah. Yeah, when you go to the trains, as you said, in Europe or China, other places like that, high-speed, smooth, traveling trains.
	Whereas here, the tracks are just coming apart, and they weren't fast.
	You know, they haven't done anything with any of the infrastructure.
	And it's not, it would be bad enough if it was just neglect.
	But everywhere, they're shutting down power plants.
	And, well, I don't know if we're going to make it through the summer.
	I don't know if we're going to make it through the winter.
	Look at this. Too much energy usage.
	It's like you're destroying the power plants.
	You look at what is happening in China.
	They can build as many as they wish.
	There is absolutely no restriction on the quality of the emissions that come out of these power plants.
	And so they've got the advantage in terms of manufacturing on everybody.
	And if this is a global warming issue, which it is not, there is no issue at all.
	But if it were, that would be an absurd move to say that the two biggest countries in population don't have to worry about their emission stuff.
	But... These people, I think, Gerald, I've stopped calling them alarmists.
	I think they're nihilists.
	They want to have zero COVID. They want to have zero energy.
	They want to have zero people.
	They want to have zero food.
	The answer to everything is to destroy everything.
	And they're just nothing other than paranoid nihilists.
	They want to kill and destroy everything that they see.
	That's it. They're evil people.
	Yeah. End of story.
	And talking about evil people, look what they just did with this G7 meeting.
	$50 billion going to Ukraine?
	Yeah. The most corrupt country in Europe?
	Not my language, according to the European Union.
	And a poll taken in Ukraine, 89% of the people, the number...
	Two concerned. First one is war.
	89% government corruption.
	Yeah, yeah. Oh, yeah.
	That's for the Ukrainian people.
	I think it's a big money laundering operation that's going on there.
	Isn't it interesting, you know, that the big guy, Biden, can get $10 million.
	They don't report it on income tax.
	Nothing happens to them.
	You know, it's now, at first they said, well, it's a lie.
	It's a Russian conspiracy theory.
	Now that it's all proven, they still don't do anything about it.
	And so, you know, the corruption in Washington is just rampant.
	And all these politicians are for sale.
	The $100 million that Trump got from Adelson, that was the entire amount that George W. Bush spent in 2000.
	And Gore complained that he's buying the election because Gore only spent $70 million all combined.
	And here you got one person.
	One person gives $100 million.
	And it's because they know they can get whatever they want.
	Well, you know what he wanted?
	What he wanted was to move the American embassy, Sheldon Adelson, from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
	And that land that Israel stole in the Golden Heights, Trump said, yeah, it's yours.
	And his wife, Sheldon Adelson's wife, just gave, I believe, another $25 million to Trump.
	Really? Yeah.
	Well, it's chump change to her.
	Yeah. $100 million to somebody who's got $33, $34 billion, that means nothing at all.
	Yeah, I know. You're right. And, you know, again, I launched Occupy Peace over a decade ago.
	Not a penny for peace in the billionaires.
	Not a penny for peace in the billionaires.
	Or the multimillionaires.
	Not a penny. Not a penny.
	That's right. If we had a billion, by the way, you know, Scott Ritter is going to be one of the speakers here.
	I had dinner with him and Judge Napolitano on Saturday.
	And Ritter said, this is going to be, we're going to make this a million person march.
	That's what we have to do.
	And he's promoting it like crazy.
	He wants to get a million people here for peace.
	If we don't have peace, we're gonna die in war.
	Because they're ramping up this Ukraine war.
	Well, again, we write about all the details.
	Only put the details in there.
	Now they did the F-15s.
	Oh, you could bomb inside of Russia now as far as you could go.
	We said you were gonna do that, but now you could do that.
	They're gonna keep ramping up this.
	There's gonna be a false flag event.
	There's gonna be a false flag event that's gonna make it quote official like 9-11 began the war on terror.
	Look how our lives have changed since the war on terror.
	Remember when you used to go to an airport and flying was fun?
	Yeah, yeah. Didn't you get felt up by jerks?
	Yeah. And go through radiation to see if you got any weapons on you?
	Take off your shoes?
	Yeah. You remember when you could go into any office building, go anywhere and anywhere, there wasn't people checking your ID going in?
	How life changed after 9-11?
	People that don't remember that either forgot about it or they're too young to know it.
	It's a whole different world.
	It's a false flag event.
	Something's going to happen.
	They're going to take us to war.
	And that's why I'm doing everything I can in the name of peace.
	I'm not just talking about it.
	Again, I'm a one-man show here.
	I need help. I launched Occupy Peace and Freedom, you know, and you would be at my rallies.
	What's the date for this next one?
	It's in September sometime, right?
	September 28th. September 28th.
	And that was Judge Napolitano's suggestion.
	He said, we need to do it just before the election.
	Yeah. And again, Scott Ritter is doing everything he can to promote this as much as he can.
	So I'm asking everybody to please do what you can.
	And you go to OccupyPeace, OccupyPeace.com, and you'll get more information from it.
	You want to donate. You know, donate what you can.
	Yeah, they just stopped him from going to Russia because they don't want anybody even talking about any of this stuff.
	That's right. And when you talk about the 50-whatever billion dollars that they stole, the aggression is coming from America.
	The Europeans are just going to give them the interest on what they had frozen, which is going to be $3 billion a year.
	But the U.S. wanted to take the entire amount, which is like 280, it's about 10% of their gross domestic product, That was confiscated.
	And so, you know, the compromise was to give them 50.
	But as one person pointed out, this means that, you know, how are they going to ever walk this thing back?
	In other words, there's no intention of walking this back.
	Because if you've stolen $50 billion and given it to these Ukrainian thieves, what do you do in terms of peace, you know, to restore that money?
	And they continue to escalate the different sanctions that are there.
	It's not just, they're not content with what they've already stolen.
	They want to continue to steal more in different ways.
	So all of it is just incrementally escalating.
	The financial stuff, the military stuff, as you point out, the F-16s, that's just fine to fly them over Russia.
	That's not aggressive at all.
	You know, how would people feel if Russian planes were flying over the United States all the time, of course?
	Yeah. Yeah. Again, and people forget the deal made between Gorbachev when they broke up the Soviet Union and Bush Sr., Look it up.
	NATO will not move one inch further.
	There were 16 NATO countries back then, and now there are 32.
	So if we had the Russians up in Canada with missiles aimed at America, and the Chinese down in Mexico with missiles aimed at America, and the Chinese fleets off the coast of California, and the Russian fleets off the coast of...
	New York, on the East Coast, we'd be very happy about that.
	Yeah, yeah. Well, I guess we'll find out what's going to be coming through the southern border pretty soon.
	Let's talk about, as we talk about Mexico, you've got an article here, John Deere sends hundreds of jobs to Mexico, another one of these giant corporations that for the longest time has been going down this digital path as well, saying you can't even fix your tractor, right?
	We've got the Millennial Copyright Act, so even if you want to buy the part from us, you can't install it.
	I mean, it's just... These multinational corporations like this, all these people think of John Deere as like, oh, that's a good old American company, and I got my John Deere cap, but it's just another one of these multinational corporations, isn't it?
	Yep, and you can thank slimeball, little murderous piece of scum Bill Clinton.
	Every time he got caught with his pants down, bombs away over Baghdad.
	Oh, you like the Kosovo War?
	No, I like the Yugoslav War.
	Yeah, that Bill Clinton gave us NAFTA. Mm-hmm.
	Yeah, and then Trump gave us the USMCA. It sounds kind of like the YMCA, but it basically didn't change anything about NAFTA. It just put a new label on it, right?
	And in some aspects, it was actually worse than that.
	Yeah. That's one of the things that I find amazing, you know, how they, all these different treaties that are out there, they don't bother to get these things ratified, just like the Climate Treaty.
	They just now, they've completely ignored due process, the rule of law.
	Congress does absolutely nothing.
	And, you know, they don't even say, wait a minute, that was our territory.
	They just give up their power.
	All they want to do is have TV shows where they criticize somebody on the other side and then never do anything about any of it.
	It's just infuriating.
	Let's talk a little bit about, you mentioned a lot about AI. Dell profits on AI server sales are falling short.
	I didn't realize that they were putting together these servers with the NVIDIA stuff.
	I didn't think that they were a big player in that, but they're a pretty big player.
	That's where Dell has moved now.
	AI is the future.
	I mean, there's no question about it.
	Again, this is a synthetic devolution.
	D-V-I-L. Everything's gone synthetic.
	Think about it. The music is synthetic.
	Synthetic fibers.
	Synthetic food. Yeah, you've got a big picture, a big feature, the coming ban on reality.
	AI is a big part of that.
	And it's only going to get much worse because the whole younger generations, I mean, they're digitized.
	That's their world.
	I mean, you see one study after another coming out about the problems that people are having with their children because of their addiction.
	I love the word smart phones.
	You know, I don't carry a cell phone.
	And I only have a flip phone that I hardly know how to use.
	I did work for the cellular telecommunications industry going back to the early 1990s when there were boxes in the trunks with aerials on the back of the trunk or the top of the car.
	That's when cell phones first came out.
	Yeah, I remember that, yeah.
	I've been studying the reports, which they no longer report anymore, of the dangers of radio frequency radiation.
	According to the University of California at Berkeley, this came out a couple of years ago, if you're on a cell phone for 17 minutes a day for 10 years, Your chances of getting a brain tumor only increase by 60%.
	Wow. Wow.
	In France, they had banned children from using cell phones because the brain shield is thinner and the radiation goes in deeper and quicker.
	They all changed it because they all got paid off and bought out.
	Yeah. Yeah.
	Members of Congress...
	Take lobbyist jobs paying as much as $4 million.
	The revolving door in Washington is perhaps the most pernicious form of corruption.
	It is illegal for incumbents to receive direct financial rewards from their interest groups that lobby them daily.
	But financial rewards are often delayed until retirement.
	While serving members angle for high-paid private sector positions, trading favors and votes for future career after working as an elected official.
	A member of Congress earning $174,000 salary can multiply that by retiring and taking a position with a lobbying firm or corporate interests.
	This is an article. It was from this guy, Mike Rogers, making $987 million, former guy from Michigan.
	Yeah, or John Boehner, you know.
	John Boehner is a great example of that, too, yeah.
	Yep. Former Representative Jim Nussel, Republican in Iowa, $2,633,000.
	Former Senator Ken Souser, $3,489,000.
	Wow.
	Souser was elected to the Senate in 2004.
	He left his first term early to become Secretary of the Interior.
	After the Obama administration, Souser joined a law firm, Wilmer Hale, as a partner.
	He worked for several oil and gas interests, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	And it goes on. Former Representative Pat Tiberi, Republican in Ohio, $1 million, on and on.
	It's a crime syndicate.
	Oh, yeah. Yeah. And there's all these articles a couple of weeks ago about John Boehner being the mentor to this new Machiavellian, Mike Johnson, how he's doing secret fundraisers for him and everything.
	Now the two of them have come out of the closet.
	And, you know, the Republican conservative base hated John Boehner so much, and they don't seem to get it.
	And yet, Mike Johnson isn't even waiting until he retires.
	I mean, he got $20 million in his first full quarter as Speaker of the House.
	John Boehner, who was saying, I'm unalterably opposed to marijuana in any way, shape, or form being legalized.
	And then he became a lobbyist for that industry.
	Regardless of what you think of it, the hypocrisy of this guy, the fact that he is for sale, and the fact that he is the big mentor for Mike Johnson, I think it says it all, where this Congress is.
	As I said, they're the Bloods and the Crips in different uniforms.
	Yeah. Oh, absolutely.
	That they're murderers and thieves.
	Yeah. Yeah.
	You know, also, I want to talk also about what's going on with this Israel war, this genocidal war.
	And this is disgusting what they're doing.
	Bombing the place into ruin.
	Bombing it into ruin. Hamas is living in everybody's house.
	We've got to knock them all down.
	Schools, mosques, hospitals.
	This is unbelievable.
	Now, we've been warning in the Trends Journal for months, Israel's going to keep ramping up the war.
	And we said they're going to escalate the attacks against Syria, Lebanon, and Iran.
	And now they escalated it against Lebanon.
	They just killed one guy, top guy, in Hezbollah.
	All of the mainstream media calls Hezbollah a terrorist group.
	There's only a couple of countries, United States, Israel, would call them terrorists.
	Hezbollah are the men that fought to drive the murderous Israelis out of Lebanon.
	The Israelis that wanted to steal more land and occupied and slaughtered people in Lebanon, and when you threw them out, you're a terrorist.
	Now they killed that guy, and now they're ramping up the war.
	This is from HaHadetz, the Israeli newspaper.
	And by the way, what we do in the Trends Journal, and by the way, you have to subscribe to us.
	You've got to pay to go to HaHadetz.
	We go to all the media around the world.
	So we go to Haaretz, we go to Jerusalem Times, Jerusalem Post, Times of Israel, Tehran Times, ISNA, IRNA, the Iranian, we go to Al Jazeera.
	We want to hear what everybody's saying.
	This is from Haaretz yesterday.
	Minister Gantz, Hezbollah does not stop attacking Israel.
	You ready? Lebanon should burn.
	In other words, we'll kill all the Lebanese just like we're killing all the people in Gaza.
	Because, you know, they're saying all these people in Gaza, no, they're just all members of Hamas.
	Little kids, women, children, over 40,000 dead.
	The numbers are much higher.
	People still buried in rubble.
	Some 100,000 seriously wounded.
	Starving to death.
	And he goes on to say, if you carry out a preemptive strike, you are sure to start a war.
	The Israeli government did not.
	Lebanon should burn.
	So it's okay for Israel to keep...
	Oh, according to the data, not my numbers.
	Again, this is what they came out with.
	Hezbollah says over 300 people And 50 of their people so far have been killed by Israel since the war began after the Hamas attack.
	So you're not allowed to retaliate against Israel.
	Just like if the United States invades Iraq, the United States invades Afghanistan, the people that are fighting the United States are militants.
	They're terrorists.
	Mm-hmm. Yeah, I agree.
	Yeah, when we look at, again, we've gotten so far away from the foundations of our society and from the Constitution, the idea that we would debate a war.
	Why? Well, because there are certain things that justify military response and certain things that don't.
	And one of the things, you know, we've talked about this before, the fact that Even with the maneuvering of FDR to get the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor, once they attacked Pearl Harbor, well, then it was on.
	You know, it was a justified thing to come after them, even though, you know, it was a passive-aggressive act by FDR.
	However, you know, when you look at the targeting of civilian populations, and I guess we did this to such an extent during World War II that we just kind of wiped out this idea that civilian populations aren't legitimate targets, but they never were in Western civilization.
	It was based on Christianity.
	They never were targets that were reasonable.
	We went to a lot of, part of a justified war was trying to avoid civilian casualties.
	Part of a justified war was to try, even when you were the one that was invaded, you were the one that was attacked first, the purpose of a justified war is to end the war as soon as possible, to avoid ongoing casualties like that.
	But that's not the goal.
	The goal is simply to have a pretense to continue forever with this stuff.
	Yep. Oh, yeah, look what they did to Dresden.
	Yeah, that's right. I mean, it was all people, innocent people there.
	Or just look at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, right?
	Well, you know, they started, so we're going to finish it type of thing, and that was going to save us, save our soldiers, so they didn't have to fight from island to island.
	Well, if you wanted to keep this limited to the combatants, you could have nuked one island, and that didn't stop it.
	You nuked the next island that is fortified instead of attacking it with Marines.
	They could have done that with military targets.
	They could have achieved the same type of thing, but instead they wanted to go after the civilian population.
	And that's something that I think, you know, that's why I draw the line.
	I mean, I'm seeing people, so many, you know, big Christian leaders who are saying, excusing this and saying, well, because God has separated out the Jewish people is what I believe then, and I believe that God is going to do something with them at the end of time, the end of, you know, with their interpretation of revelations.
	So I don't think any of the moral stuff matters anymore.
	Because of what I think is going to happen with the end of the world.
	I've said from the very beginning of this stuff, I think if that's your approach, you have completely missed the boat.
	You take the clear moral principles that are there, and then that is your bedrock.
	That is the foundation of what you do.
	Your understanding about how revelation is going to play out is if that causes you to violate these rules, Foundational principles that are clearly stated, then maybe you need to rethink that.
	God doesn't need you to support mass murder and endless war in order to achieve his plans.
	He doesn't need to have you jump in on this and be his warriors in an unjustified way.
	I just don't understand that with the...
	You know, the Christian population.
	I've got a lot of people who get angry with me.
	Conservatives get angry with me because I don't support Trump and I don't support this war continuing on and on.
	But, you know, that's what it is.
	It is what it is. And, you know, these are foundational principles.
	I just don't understand how Christians are continuing to cheer this and just let this go when there is no continuing threat that is there.
	They're just endless killing.
	Yep. And again, what's going on in Russia has nothing to do with...
	Ukraine has nothing to do with America.
	Yeah, yeah. They're not threatening us.
	Right. What's going on in Israel?
	Again, they invented the damn place.
	Again, the Balfour Declaration, 1917, His Majesty's government declares that the land in Palestine will be settled by the Jewish people, and we will do our best endeavors to achieve this objective.
	Who the hell are you to say this?
	And what if I don't believe in your religion?
	Can you handle that? Yeah.
	I know. Oh no, God gave us this land.
	It says so in the Torah. You know, chapter 6, section 8.
	You know, what if I don't believe you're garbage?
	Oh, oh, and when Moses came down with Ten Commandments?
	Hey, did you forget the one thou shalt not kill?
	Yeah. I know.
	I know. There's foundational things that just get around them.
	I got a couple of comments here.
	Michelle Obama. Thank you for the tip.
	Gerald, the art on the Trends Journal covers is like nothing else.
	The Titans on Wall Street gave me a nightmare.
	Another one from Andromeda1.
	Thank you for the tips. Gerald, what does the industry consider to be the worst case scenario of percentage of office spaces rented?
	That's a good question. Do they think it's going to continue to get worse?
	Is it going to flatline this until people die?
	Do they have an end point that you think it's going to go to?
	When enough banks start failing, then the reality is going to hit.
	The people are suffering, the average person.
	But they know how bad it is only when Wall Street crashes.
	Mm-hmm. That's when the reality hits.
	So when the banks go bust, Wall Street's going to crash and gold prices are going to skyrocket.
	Again, we don't give financial advice.
	A golden year for gold was one of our top trends for 2024.
	Mm-hmm. Came out.
	Gold prices have gone up $300 an ounce since we said that.
	Yeah. And I just want to mention this before we close out.
	You mentioned about how the United States faked us into World War II. Yeah.
	Before Pearl Harbor, 80% of the American people were against the war.
	This is from history today.
	This day in history. See it?
	Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.
	On July 26, 1941, President Franklin Roosevelt seized all Japanese assets in the United States.
	You know why?
	In retaliation for the Japanese occupation of French Indochina.
	Yeah, before Pearl Harbor.
	Yeah. What...
	What do I care what the Japanese are doing and what the hell are the French doing in French Indo?
	You mean Vietnam?
	You mean Cambodia?
	You mean Laos where they're stealing the rubber, tin, rape, pillage, and plunder?
	How dare those Japanese try to throw out those slimy Frenchmen?
	Goes on. On July 24th, And here, President Roosevelt swung into action by freezing all Japanese assets.
	Britain and the Dutch East Indies followed suit.
	Dutch East Indies? What are the Dutch doing over there in Indonesia?
	Oh, we're stealing and pillaging and robbing!
	We're the Dutch!
	Okay? It goes on.
	The result, Japan lost access to three-fourths of its overseas trade and 88% of its imported oil.
	They only import 100%.
	They lost their trade.
	They lost their oil.
	Can't understand why they bought Pearl Harbor.
	Can't figure it out.
	Yeah, yeah. We've only got a couple of minutes left, but if we have to go a little bit longer, I wanted to get your answer to this from Jason Barker.
	He says... I know Gerald would disagree with me, but I think the unused office spaces will be converted to communal living as part of the 15-minute city objective.
	They'll get those buildings for nothing.
	Gerald says they can't be converted to living spaces, which is true for typical living space.
	But if you're going to put in communal living and they don't really care how people are living, it says if each floor has a shared bathroom, shower, then the rest could be cubed off into sleeping spaces.
	Then there could be A single cafeteria with assigned eating times like being in the military or some kind of a prison.
	What do you think? Will they make a 15-minute prison thing like that?
	Yeah, they could do something like that, but it's minor.
	Again, the numbers, not my numbers, but I hear what they're saying.
	Yeah, they could do for some of them.
	But buildings built in the last 50 years are non-convertible.
	Yeah, they can make these wide-open spaces and have one shower, this or that.
	Yeah, that's true. But it'll amount to nothing.
	And I think what'll happen is, even if they made some of this stuff into like...
	Yeah, even if they did concentration camps with it or something like that.
	Still, before that, it's going to be the banking collapses when they can't refinance this stuff and make money off of it that's really going to set the economy on fire and burn it down, I think.
	And before we run out of time, let me just thank Michelle Obama and James and Jason and Tornator and Sprumford.
	Thank you all for your support.
	I really do appreciate this.
	As Robert says, add this to the pot.
	Well, we will. Thank you very much.
	And thank you, Gerald. I appreciate you coming on.
	It's always great talking to you.
	And again, Trends Journal folks, it is amazing.
	Take a look at it.
	You can see the articles that are there, see what they cover.
	I think they can get and they can take a look at something that you've got there to kind of see how it is set up in a magazine format.
	But if you use the code NIGHT, you can save 10%.
	What can they see if they go there?
	I know that you can see the table of contents of what's discussed in this current issue.
	Is there like a trial issue that they can look through, an older issue that they can look through?
	If they don't like it, they give 30-day money back guarantee.
	Okay, that's good. Costing them nothing.
	Well, we guarantee you're going to like it.
	It's got a lot of information, and the way this thing is presented is very professional and very easy to consume.
	So thank you so much for what you're doing, Gerald.
	Appreciate it. And again, what's the date in September of this Occupy piece that you're setting up?
	September 28th.
	September 28th.
	Mark it on your calendars.
	So far, Scott Ritter and Judge Napolitano will be here, and we'll be announcing more people coming on.
	Well, that should help. That should help a lot.
	Take a look, folks. Gerald could certainly use your help with that as well.
	Occupy peace. He's not going to get any money from the big guys.
	It's going to be a grassroots thing if it's going to happen.
	And so that's coming up September 28th.
	Mark your calendars. Kingston, New York.
	Thank you, Gerald. A million people.
	We need a million people.
	That's right. Absolutely. We need peace.
	Thank you. We need peace. But, you know, I'm just looking at some of the things over here.
	And on and on, they're warning about a nuclear war.
	Yeah. And it's going to happen if we don't stop this, and it's going to be the end of life on Earth.
	I agree. I agree. That's what they want.
	I mean, look at the... I showed earlier, they're at G7, and there was a Telegraph article where they put the negative approval of all of these clowns that were there.
	And I mean, the best one was minus 10, and most of them were like minus 55%.
	That's when they take you to war, when they're that far underwater.
	So, thank you. That's what I say.
	When all else fails, they take you to war.
	This is from Reuters.
	March 22, 2023.
	A nuclear war with the U.S. is more likely than ever.
	Russia warns.
	Yeah. Yeah.
	Oh, absolutely. Absolutely.
	I agree. I agree.
	Yeah, we're running a little bit on overtime.
	If you've got to answer one more question here, this is DG8. David asked Gerald to comment on Thomas Massey revealing every Republican congressperson has an APAC handler.
	Yep. Yeah. And they came after him at the last minute for a $300,000 ad, I think.
	But again, he beat them. You know, if you make an issue of Soros or somebody trying to, you know, jumping into the last minute that's not from that community and you make an issue out of it, you can actually beat that.
	And he certainly, he got 75%, I think, of the vote.
	Thomas Massey's a great guy.
	He's a true American spirit boy.
	This guy's a real fighter. I did a talk for Ron Paul Institute, and he was one of the speakers that I was there, so I met him.
	He's the only real guy out there that's on the side of the people that I believe in.
	I agree. Yeah, he's my congressman, even though he's in a different state.
	That's absolutely right. He is the single one out of 530 of them, or whatever the total number is.
	He's the only one, unfortunately.
	But at least there's a voice, and he's a good voice, I think.
	Absolutely. He's a great voice. Well, we're out of time.
	Thank you so much, Gerald Salenti, TrendsJournal.com.
	Everybody have a great weekend.
	Thank you, Gerald. You have a great weekend, too, okay?
	Thank you for all that you do.
	do I appreciate it. Thank you.
	you They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.

▲