Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 13, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:39

The David Knight Show - 06/13/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Welcome to the 20th anniversary of the American Revolution.
	Thank you.
	soon.
	You're listening to The David Night Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday the 13th of June, year of our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to begin by taking a look at the Cuban Missile Crisis Part 2.
	Yeah, there's a lot of...
	I guess history doesn't repeat itself, but there's a lot of rhyming that is certainly going on as we see these moves by the Russian Navy.
	Again, it's a lot of signaling so far, nothing of any substance.
	We'll take a look at that. We're also going to take a look at artificial intelligence.
	Folks, it's just like a magician's trick.
	And once you see how the illusion works, the magic is gone forever.
	And I want to take away that illusion and that magic forever today.
	I've got just the stuff to show you.
	We'll be right back. Stay with us.
	Well, history certainly does rhyme as we see Russian warships headed to Cuba.
	And also to Venezuela and other places.
	It is a message that is being sent.
	And as we look at history, it took a very long time for what really was happening behind the scenes of the Cuban Missile Crisis to come to light.
	They kept that hidden for quite some time.
	We'll talk about that.
	But it is vividly etched into my mind as a child who had just entered second grade and living in Florida.
	And everybody's saying, well, you know, once they launch these missiles, they'll be here in no time.
	You won't even have time to go home a couple blocks to your house.
	So you got to bring extra clothes and all the rest of the stuff.
	We had our drills where we stuck our heads in the desk.
	And it's like... Even for a seven-year-old, I don't think this makes any sense.
	And it didn't make any sense.
	Senseless, useless war, and it had an origin that is not usually talked about.
	All the drama of the missiles of October, JFK courageously standing down the Russians, well, it wasn't that at all.
	It's the first time in four years that Russian warships arrived in Cuba.
	And so the Pentagon is saying, well, this is standard procedure.
	Well, they hadn't done it since 2020.
	But they began doing it back when the Obama administration began the coup in Ukraine.
	They had not done it for, well, 63, for about 50 years.
	And then in 2013, as this coup was being put together, they sent some ships to Cuba.
	And they did it every year until 2020.
	And then I guess because of pandemic and things like that, they decided they would not do it.
	But now they're back doing it again.
	Why is that?
	The Pentagon does not consider the ships, says USA Today, conducting military exercises in the Caribbean to be a threat.
	Now there's different opinions about this.
	This is the mainstream media parroting the Pentagon.
	But they said the port visits of the ships comes amid heightened tensions between Russia and the U.S. and NATO. The Pentagon supplies Ukraine with advanced arms and in recent weeks has allowed some of those weapons to be fired at targets inside Russia.
	That's what has changed.
	This is all about reminding Americans that two can play this game.
	If you want to put missiles and other things like that very close to Russia...
	Authorize their use to be fired into Russia.
	Well, we can do that with Cuba.
	We can do that with Venezuela, says the Russians.
	U.S. Northern Command downplayed the presence of the Russian ships.
	Said that they had sailed in the Caribbean annually from 2013 to 2020.
	Again, I think there may be some connection with the Obama administration.
	But going back into history, did Kennedy really stand down Khrushchev?
	Was Cuba really this mindless Russian aggression?
	I grew up thinking that.
	It's like, how in the world?
	What was he thinking of?
	Why would he do that? That was the way it was portrayed to the public.
	And yet, it might not have been Russian aggression.
	It might have been retaliation.
	It might have been a bargaining chip.
	The Jupiter missiles that were in Turkey were a key part of this.
	And if you go back and look at history, which was eventually released, the documents were, It's very interesting because what is happening is prior to all of this, they had put missiles in Turkey.
	Now this is now understood.
	And then there was a big pushback from Turkey saying it's going to make NATO look weak.
	Italy was concerned about that. Kissinger was not, at that point in time, and this is the JFK administration, remember, this is not the Nixon administration where they essentially made Kissinger the king, a secretary of state. This was in the JFK administration, before the Johnson
	administration, and yet they sent Henry Kissinger to Italy.
	Another interesting connection, if you know history of what happened with NATO in Italy, with Operation Gladio and other things, and Kissinger's involvement with that, but Kissinger goes as, what, a private citizen?
	Really? I mean, he taught at Harvard, but does that qualify him to go as kind of an envoy to represent the U.S. government in Italy?
	Future Secretary of State Henry Kissinger discussed the U.S. withdrawal of Jupiter intermediate-range ballistic missiles from Italy in January of 1963 talks with top Italian officials and diplomats.
	And according to Kissinger, he said almost everyone he talked to in Rome believed that there had been a U.S.-Soviet agreement on the Jupiter withdrawal, with some of them pointing to an April 1st deadline for beginning the removals as an important clue.
	There's some kind of, obviously there's some kind of an agreement.
	We've even got a deadline here.
	Oh, you're just a bunch of conspiracy theorists.
	Really? Kessinger and his Italian interlocutors had no inside knowledge of White House policymaking, but they were touching on one of the biggest secrets of the Cuban Missile Crisis, the undisclosed deal between Kennedy and Khrushchev, in which the U.S. would remove Jupiter missiles in Turkey and, by extension, the Jupiters in Italy, in exchange for the removal of Soviet missiles in Cuba.
	The Cuban Missile Crisis was setting up bargaining chips and In response to NATO aggression, in a sense, pre-positioning these missiles as close as they could to Russia.
	So Russia said, well, we can do the same thing.
	They're openly saying that now about this visit to Cuba.
	Only nine U.S. officials knew of the deal at the time.
	President Kennedy, his brother Robert Kennedy, National Security Advisor McGeorge Bundy, Secretary of State Dean Rusk, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, Deputy Secretary of Defense Roswell Gilpatrick, Ambassador Llewellyn Thompson, Deputy Secretary of State George Ball, and White House Advisor Theodore Sorensen.
	Of that group, those who lived past the 1960s and 70s—Bundy, Rusk, Sorensen, and McNamara, for example—kept the secret for years, not fully acknowledging the official status of the deal until 1989.
	when former Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin disclosed the details in his October 1962 meeting with Robert Kennedy.
	So most of our life, this was kept secret.
	And, of course, it was not until, I think, 1997 that the full document of Operation Northwoods, which was the plan to essentially do a 9-11-style attack so they could justify a war with Cuba.
	It wasn't until 1997 that that was released, even though that happened in the early 60s before the Cuban Missile Crisis.
	You had Lyman Lemnitzer, who had come up with Operation Northwoods, Operation Mongoose, and other things to create a blame, to create justification to go to war with Cuba.
	And if you look at the text of Operation Northwoods, all the documents have been released now.
	What were they planning to do?
	They were going to fly planes into buildings, remote control.
	In the 60s, early 60s, they were going to do attacks, terrorist attacks of shopping malls, terrorist attacks of U.S. military bases and kill U.S. soldiers and blame it on Cubans.
	And so when this was shown to people in the JFK administration, they said no.
	As a matter of fact, they fired Lemnitzer, who was the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
	His new job was to go to NATO. And at NATO, they ran Operation Gladio, which had a lot of involvement in Italy.
	It also involved Henry Kissinger.
	Later on in the 70s, they pretended the Red Brigade was doing these attacks, when in reality, it was the NATO people who had left behind.
	They had undercover agents.
	They had undercover weapons in case the communists overran the area, and they thought that For all practical purposes, that had happened with the election of Aldo Moro.
	He was so left-wing.
	Well, let's just acknowledge that this is the same as if the Soviets had overrun Italy.
	So let's begin this attack.
	But we'll do it as a false flag.
	We'll say that we're communists, and we'll start kneecapping industrialists, and we'll start kidnapping and killing.
	And they kidnapped Aldo Moro.
	Kissinger was involved in the negotiations. He sent Steve Pachinik, the CIA, to do, to see what was going on with Aldo Moro.
	His judgment was that Aldo Moro had figured this out, so they killed Aldo Moro.
	And those were the findings of an Italian investigation, not published in the United States, not talked about by Alex Jones, his pal Steve Pachinik, who also did a false flag attack on Alex Jones's listeners two days after the election to start this stop the steal to create the impetus to go into January the 6th.
	So it's very interesting to me to see how all these different threads of history tie together and how they are repeating themselves as well.
	Now, Fox News has a different approach than USA Today as USA Today presents itself as a spokesperson of the Pentagon.
	There's nothing unusual going on.
	Nothing to worry about. Fox News says this is not routine.
	They talked to experts who say Putin's fleet of warships in Cuba is a direct warning to Biden. And again, mainstream media is going to try to tamp down that warning because Biden and actually the people who control the Biden administration, the Biden regime, are not going to change course whatsoever. Putin wants to be close to the U.S. homeland at this time when the Russian-Ukraine crisis is on high
	escalatory trajectory. Given Biden's authorization to Ukraine, if something goes wrong and Ukraine strikes critical targets in Russia close to major cities, the Russian military can enable the Cubans to strike targets inside the U.S. or to strike U.S.
	interests.
	And that is according to Rebecca Koffler, a strategic intelligence analyst and author of a book, Putin's Playbook.
	But they also talk to other people as well.
	As Fox News said, the arrival of ships comes after Putin suggested that he may authorize strikes on the U.S. via proxy countries, which he says is precisely what the U.S. is doing in Ukraine.
	You see, when it comes to a critical eye...
	Of Biden policy, you can count on Fox and people who are opponents of Biden to tell you the truth.
	They'll lie to you if it was Trump who was doing this exact same thing.
	They would lie. They would ignore it.
	They would say, there's nothing going on, just as the mainstream media and the left-wing media are saying.
	This is what I think is truly happening.
	And just understand that built-in bias, what these news organizations do.
	Fox's business model is based on having access to the GOP. And they will shill for the GOP. They'll always be on attack for the Democrats.
	They will tell you the truth about the Democrats, but they'll lie to you about the GOP. Same way that RT will tell you the truth About what's going on in America for the most part, but they'll lie to you about what's going on in Russia.
	And on and on. Same thing with mainstream media.
	And of course, it's not that they are solid in terms of telling the truth about their opponent.
	Part of it is to slant news about their opponent as well.
	And there's no question about the built-in bias.
	There's no question that that's the very essence of their existence.
	They have to cater to big pharmaceutical companies, they have to cater to the military industrial complex in one way or the other.
	There is an area, however, where they are free to challenge the policies of their political opponents, but they must not do it in a way that would threaten the military industrial complex.
	You have to understand those constraints and apply that to anything that you read from these people.
	They go on, the director of a Latin American program at the Washington-based Wilson Center think tank said, most of all the warships are reminded to Washington that it is unpleasant when an adversary meddles in your near abroad.
	It also reminds Russia's friends in the region, including U.S. antagonists, Cuba and Venezuela, that Moscow is on their side.
	If the U.S. considers it possible to deliver such weapons to the combat zone to launch strikes on our territory and to create problems for us, why don't we have the right to supply weapons of the same type to some regions of the world where they can be used to launch strikes on sensitive facilities of the countries that do it to Russia?
	Asked Putin.
	Why is it okay for America to put missiles...
	That can fire deep inside Russia, right next to Russia.
	Oh, then can't we do the same thing?
	And, of course, that is a rhetorical question.
	And as we look at our national security, right?
	Is there really any national security for us?
	Is there any national security at our border?
	Does Biden really support our military?
	When you look at what he did with the vaccine mandates and all the rest of the stuff, but just take a look at this.
	It was a bipartisan support in Congress to do a pay raise for the military.
	It was going to total $24 billion, a lot of money.
	However, Biden now becomes a fiscal hawk.
	No, we can't do that.
	What are you talking about? That would bankrupt us.
	We'd have to, I don't know, print more money or something.
	They spent seven times this amount on Ukraine.
	They refused to pay even one-seventh of the amount that they gave to Ukraine on pay raises for the troops who are feeling inflation just like the rest of us.
	And in this bipartisan commission...
	Inside the House, again, Democrats as well as Republicans there said, we need to retain.
	We've kicked out a lot of people, and we're having a lot of trouble recruiting people after they see the way that we treated people with vaccines.
	And so we kicked a lot of people out because of that.
	A lot of people don't want to join because of that.
	So we've got to do something to boost retention.
	Maybe we should give them a pay raise to make them feel like they're keeping up with inflation, even though it won't.
	No, says Biden.
	We're not going to think about that.
	Just like we have to go to war with Russia.
	We have to go to war in the Middle East for our national security, of course, and yet we won't secure our own border.
	Not a dime for our own border.
	Not a dime of a pay increase for our own troops.
	Really. The Biden administration strongly opposes a proposal to raise the pay of junior enlisted service members in the military even after nearly spending seven times the proposed amount on Ukraine.
	The House Armed Services Committee draft of the NDAA for next year would give all junior troops a pay raise representing a rough total of about $24.4 billion over five years.
	Again, this is one-seventh what they gave to Ukraine.
	Spread out over five years.
	Nope, not going to do it. Not a penny for the border.
	Nothing at all for the troops.
	It truly is amazing how they can be so firm about some things.
	My son Whistler's doing the board today, and I paraphrase Jefferson when they attacked the Barbary Pirates.
	So this is not Jefferson.
	This is the position of Biden.
	A fortune for tribute, but not a penny for defense.
	We have turned our country upside down and inside out, haven't we?
	Sources say that Biden's Gaza Pier is endangering troops' lives for a photo op.
	Yeah, that's right. It is.
	A useless photo op.
	This is a story from Breitbart.
	It said, there's approximately 1,000 troops who are part of this novel operation to attach a floating pier to the coast of Gaza.
	The pier went operational on May 17th, but eight days later, on May 25th, it broke apart due to heavy seas, had to be dismantled from the coast and repaired, and it was reattached just last week.
	Some elements sunk as well.
	One U.S. source involved in the mission said the pier has been targeted daily.
	There absolutely has been gunfire and mortars all day and all night, non-stop.
	And yet, this is consistent with the Biden administration.
	Not a penny of hazardous duty pay for the soldiers who are there.
	I think it's Army.
	I'm not sure which branch is there.
	But not a penny of hazardous pay for these people.
	They're not even feeding them regularly.
	I'm serious. Due to the risk of sniper fire, troops are ordered to wear tactical vests as far as five nautical miles out from the coast.
	And aid has to be rushed off the boats onto the temporary pier due to the constant attempts to attack the pier.
	Yet minutes before the first boat filled with aid hit the pier, troops are ordered to roll up plastic covers on the trucks so the aid could be photographed.
	Put their lives at risk so we can get a photo op here.
	Troops were also ordered to wash the aid trucks and sweep flour off of them so that they would look good in the photos.
	The source said this happened twice.
	Once for the first delivery of the operation and again recently after the pier was reattached.
	The Biden administration has also boasted about the amount of aid, a little more than 2,000 metric tons to date.
	But sources say that moving that amount of aid has taken a toll on the troops.
	Two U.S. sources.
	Commanders are ordering troops to work 12 to 48 hour shifts with very little sleep so they can move more pallets, which has led to many accidents, they said, including one service member being crushed by a forklift.
	I remember they had several...
	People who were injured, they said one was killed.
	Maybe that was preliminary information.
	I never saw any additional details of it.
	This one, they go into details about this soldier who was crushed by the forklift.
	The first U.S. source says that it was lack of sleep that led to the service member being run and crushed over by an unlicensed forklift driver during night operations.
	An unlicensed forklift driver.
	Was this an American?
	Was this some ringer that they pulled in from some other country?
	Anyway... I don't know if this is what was initially reported as a death.
	They don't mention, in addition to this, this is the most severe injury they mention.
	They don't mention a death with this.
	But, you know, here's an idea.
	And, of course, many people mention this.
	They talked about this whole Rube Goldberg thing.
	An Army veteran talked about how ridiculous this whole thing was going to be.
	How needlessly complicated and dangerous and expensive, of course.
	But, you know, here's an idea. Israel is blocking the road where people are trying to bring aid in.
	Since they're our allies, since we pay them so much, why can't we just tell them to open up and let the aid in?
	Oh, can't do that.
	Oh, can't do that. They own the U.S. government.
	It's just unbelievable to see how this is happening.
	I mean, we have, our U.S. government is owned by foreign interests.
	Some of them Are done secretly.
	You know, like the tens of millions of dollars given to the Biden family that they don't pay taxes on.
	Then even when that secretive corruption is exposed, there's no charges.
	But then there's also corruption that is done openly.
	And so, you know, the conservatives get all bent out of shape, and rightfully so.
	About Hunter and the big guy getting away with $10 million.
	Not only did they not pay taxes on it, they didn't file the fact that they were taking this money from lobbyists and all the rest of this stuff.
	They didn't follow any rules and no charges.
	And yet at the same time, you know, as Trump has taken in $400 million, 100 of that, one quarter of that, came from the widow of Sheldon Adelson.
	An Israeli living in Israel who is buying influence with Trump for $100 million.
	And you stop and think about it.
	This is somebody who has inherited from her gangster former husband who ran casinos like Donald Trump.
	These, you know, who said that there's no honor among thieves.
	Got casino owners hanging together here.
	She inherited and has a fortune that is estimated between $33 and $34 billion.
	She's 79 years old.
	How is she going to be able to spend that money before she dies?
	Well, for a small amount of money, she can buy Donald Trump.
	Just think about it, okay?
	Let's just drop off some zeros there.
	This is somebody who's got, you know, $30 billion.
	Let's imagine that you had $30,000 in the bank.
	I know, that's an imaginary thing for almost all Americans, to imagine that they've got $30,000 in the bank.
	But let's say that you've got $30,000 in the bank, and you give $100.
	That's what we're talking about here.
	She's got $34 billion and she gave $100 million.
	So, you know, you drop off those zeros.
	Could you give...
	Wouldn't it be interesting if somebody who had $30,000 in the bank If they could give Trump $100 and they could basically open up the floodgates for him to give the coffers, turn over the coffers and the Treasury Department to a foreign government.
	And all you have to do is give them $100.
	You've got $30,000 in the bank.
	You can afford to give Trump $100.
	That's the kind of calculation that's going on there.
	And the conservatives are just fine with that.
	Just fine with that if it's done in the open.
	But they're all bent out of shape about one-tenth of that amount that is done by Biden.
	I'm not saying that that excuses what Biden did.
	I'm just saying, lock them all up.
	Lock them all up.
	They're all criminals. They're all selling us out for their own gain.
	They're selling us out.
	Just amazing. Won't even tell Israel to let the waiting aid trucks drive in on the road.
	So we go to this complicated thing of putting up a pier.
	Hundreds of millions of dollars for that.
	According to a U.S. source, this service member who was injured is currently brain dead and in a coma.
	The Pentagon has acknowledged two other service members being injured, but calling them minor injuries.
	The troops were getting barely more than two meals a day.
	Not only is this aid operation not feeding people in Gaza, the Pentagon's not really even interested in feeding its own troops.
	Isn't that interesting? With some getting only one meal a day consisting of cucumber sandwiches.
	The first U.S. source said this is because chow hours do not match up with the shift hours.
	And some location troops are working at do not have meals prepared for them.
	We've become so bureaucratic we can't change anything, right?
	Well, we've got our rules. We're a bureaucracy, you know.
	And this is when we do chow hours.
	I'm sorry. It's not my job to figure out how to feed these people.
	We can't give them leftovers.
	Sorry.
	The person said, I just feel like the priorities of a command sergeant major and a brigade commander are not in the right places.
	It's just push aid whatever you have to do. I don't care what it takes.
	And not how can we push aid safely, said the first US source.
	Well, after we've seen what they did with the vaccine mandates, why would this surprise anybody?
	I don't really care about you.
	I don't care about your career, how many years you put in.
	I don't care what a good job you've done.
	I don't care if you're a long-term military personnel.
	I don't care if you're a Navy SEAL or a pilot that we've invested unbelievable amounts of money in and training.
	You take this vaccine or you're out.
	That's when you realize what is really important to these people.
	That is their top priority.
	And when you realize that is their top priority, and you see how evil that is, then you know who the real enemy of America is.
	We has met the enemy, and they is us, or USA. One of the sources said the pier breaking apart could have been avoided if commanders had listened to the warnings from the troops.
	Army mariners and warrant officers who know the Army watercraft field and capabilities of equipment warned the bureaucrats, I'm sorry, the generals, yeah, and the field-grade bureaucrats, the field-grade officers, days before the weather got bad out there and they needed to go to a safe haven with the boats and the Trident Pier.
	You see, the problem is these mariners and these warrant officers are trying to figure out how can we do this job.
	The other people are trying to figure out, how can I please the big guys so I get promoted inside the bureaucracy?
	That's all they care about.
	There's this disconnect there.
	As a matter of fact, somebody had pointed out that the only one of the D-Day movies that covered the Pointe du Hoc, and I apologize for what I'm sure is a mispronunciation, But the only movie that covered that, it wasn't Spielberg, interestingly enough, even though Spielberg orchestrated them to go back to that spot.
	I guess because that's where Reagan had been.
	But Spielberg didn't cover that in Saving Private Ryan.
	The only one, said the listener, that covered that was The Longest Day.
	We watched that last Friday after I did the report on that.
	And they did cover that.
	Actually, the coverage that was in that story that I read was far better than what was done in the movie.
	But... When you look at what is happening today with all this stuff, none of this makes any sense from the perspective of the people living in this country.
	As a matter of fact, I played for you the other day, this World War II vet, 97, played at the end of the show yesterday.
	The real truth? Yeah.
	I feel like a foreigner in my own country lots of times.
	And I don't like it.
	It makes my heart real heavy.
	And I just hope we can pull out of this.
	There's too much Hollywood going on in Washington all the time.
	The important subjects they don't cover.
	So the thing is, I hope all the guys will rally up and we'll go back and straighten it all out.
	Yeah, well, you know, there's a lot of Hollywood going on with this pier, isn't it?
	It's all about photo ops.
	The stated mission doesn't matter.
	The lives of the troops doesn't matter.
	Even the existence of the pier doesn't matter.
	And then there was another clip that I didn't get to, and this was another World War II veteran.
	Again, these guys are all at or just above 100 years old.
	I am so upset.
	That the things we did and the things we fought for and the boys that died for us, it's all gone down the drain.
	Our country's gone to hell in a handbasket.
	We haven't got the country we had when I was raised.
	Not at all. Nobody left the fun I had.
	Nobody left the opportunity I had.
	It's just not the same.
	That's not what our boys...
	That's not what they died for.
	I just...
	I'm so sorry.
	I'll be alright.
	It just takes my time to get over it.
	I just...
	I just... Why me sitting here like this?
	All that's going on.
	It's just not the same.
	That isn't what we fall for.
	We better be wise and discerning about what the real purpose is behind what is happening here.
	It's not enough to fight for what you think is right and to project your goals and your morality onto these people at the top.
	They have no morality in their goals.
	They seek to enslave us, to kill us, to control us in every regard.
	And we better understand that.
	And I think a good way to understand that is to look at the careless regard With these operations in Israel, in Ukraine, these other places, they have absolutely no interest in the safety and the peace of America.
	That's not what national security is about.
	National security is about giving them money and power.
	It's about making their position secure.
	It's about them chasing promotions up the top of the ladder and they don't care what happens to the rest of us.
	The brigade commander and the higher people shut it down, they said, and less than 18 hours later resulted in the damage of the Trident Pier breaking apart.
	Vessels becoming beached.
	Some vessels sinking.
	One of them sitting at the ocean floor resulting in wasting millions in taxpayer dollars and halting aid.
	I remember now why I went to the diversion of the longest day.
	As they were showing what was happening, as the Germans were trying to determine, you know, they knew that an invasion was coming.
	They didn't know when or exactly where.
	There was a lot of misdirection to it.
	And as they figured out that it was on its way, There was this bureaucratic resistance to doing anything about it that really delayed their operations.
	Just like we see with everything that's done today.
	And I'm watching it and I'm saying, you know, we've become the Nazis.
	We've become the Nazis in terms of this arrogance, this bureaucracy that is there, trying to please the person above.
	And of course, according to the movie, I haven't looked this up to see if it's historically accurate or not, but according to the movie...
	Hitler had been given a sleeping aid and nobody wanted to wake him up.
	And according to their rules, they could not advance the reserve panzer tanks without a direct order from the Führer.
	And nobody went away.
	Everybody was afraid of him.
	Everybody was afraid of him.
	The frustration of some of the officers down the line with all that.
	Well, okay, I'm just going to go out and let's open up a bottle of rare wine and just get drunk because we're just going to watch this whole thing go down.
	That's where we are today.
	This bureaucratic pentagon has done that.
	Yeah, sure. Go ahead and play that video on the pier.
	There you go. Look at that.
	There it is. I see he's moving around.
	Such an idiotic idea.
	Such an idiotic idea.
	AP RumbleSeat says they're provoking a nuke.
	Because these maniacs think they can run underground to their luxury shelters, completely divorced from reality.
	Absolutely right. Absolutely right.
	And you know, the depopulation stuff is really, they're concerned.
	I mean, you know, there's 8 billion of us and there's only a handful of them.
	They've got to even up the odds.
	That's the most obvious reason why they want to kill everybody.
	I know that Bill Gates has been part of a deep satanic cult.
	His whole family has been involved in pushing abortion and eugenics and all the rest of the stuff.
	And now Melinda Gates, after the divorce, she has now become the biggest promoter of abortion.
	But Bill Gates, who used to have that position, has now moved on to other things, like starving us, vaccinating us, tracking us, all the rest of that stuff.
	What evil people.
	So despite all these unsafe conditions, sources say troops are being denied hazardous duty pay.
	They disregard them.
	They insult them, as they always do.
	Again, it was just a week ago, on D-Day, 80th anniversary, Biden pretending that he cared, and Trump didn't.
	Well, they're both draft dodgers.
	They both got deferments all through the Vietnam War.
	Biden himself got six deferments.
	He doesn't support the troops in any way, shape, or form.
	Neither of them do.
	So they just use them as geopolitical pawns.
	That's the kind of 4D chess they play.
	These people's lives are just pawns to them.
	AP RumbleSeat said they abused the hell out of boots on the ground and MK them to be destroyed with insane policy, then shadow ban anyone that points out that it is treasonous.
	That's right. Yeah, I like the term mute.
	I think the mute, you know, we've talked about shadow banning and stuff.
	I think it's more accurate.
	People see the mute button, you know, the fact that you can mute somebody who you don't like or troll or something on your stream.
	You can, instead of banning them, which says, oh, look, so-and-so banned me.
	You can just mute them.
	So they think that they're talking to you, but you don't see it.
	And that's really what shadow ban is.
	I mean, you know, it's the same function that they give to individuals, but they do it on a site-wide basis to people.
	Retired Israeli Defense Force Brigadier General Amir Avivi told Breitbart News in an interview on Monday that there's a much easier way to transfer aid to Gaza.
	Yeah, why don't you just open up the road that you're blocking with Israeli troops?
	He agreed that the operation was a photo op.
	He said, it's easier simply to bring it to our port in Ashdod and there to put it on the trucks and transfer it into Gaza.
	There was no real reason to do this on this pier.
	As a matter of fact, they're having to put it on some kind of a pier.
	When we talked about this Rube Goldberg process that they were doing, they're having to bring it in with the bigger ships and take it to Ashdod and then send over a different kind of ship that could make the transition from, you know, it could actually connect up with this super long pier that's out there.
	And so they have the big ship that offloaded onto the pier there at Ashdod, then put it on trucks and put those trucks on another ship, then take it over to this long pier, get those trucks out, let them drive down.
	I the 1,800 feet that are there, empty their stuff, drive back, and then do the whole thing over and over again.
	But the Israeli general said, I think the only reason I can think about is it's not really the aid per se.
	But it's very visual. It's a photo op.
	And I think that it's to show, look, we're doing something.
	You know, we're really trying to bring a solution, he said.
	Avivi also predicted that there will be more attacks on the pier.
	After Palestinian news outlets reported that the pier was being used in an Israeli operation to rescue four hostages, there have been concerns about the pier becoming even more of a target.
	The UN World Food Program recently suspended operations distributing the humanitarian aid from the pier out of concern for its staff's safety.
	But, of course, there is no concern for the safety of the American troops by the American government if they can get a photo op out of it.
	Avivi said there might be a situation where the pier will be attacked again by rocket motors.
	It could happen, and sometimes they need to take that into account.
	He said motors.
	I wonder if he meant mortars, but maybe that's another term.
	I'm... Not a military guy.
	Anyway, yeah, Gaza aid peer operations have been suspended by the UN. They have suspended, the UN has suspended food distribution from the U.S.-built peer.
	The World Food Program branch in the region said on social media on Monday, The announcement comes after the aid group's warehouse complex and the enclave was reportedly hit by rockets.
	And, of course, no hazardous duty pay for the soldiers who are there.
	Well, what is this all about, really?
	Ultimately, it's all about money.
	It's all about geopolitics.
	Lindsey Graham explained it to us very candidly.
	What did Trump do to get the weapons flowing?
	He created a loan system.
	They're sitting on 10 to 12 trillion dollars of critical minerals in Ukraine.
	They could be the richest country in all of Europe.
	I don't want to give that money and those assets to Putin to share with China.
	If we help Ukraine now, they can become the best business partner we ever dreamed of.
	That 10 to 12 trillion dollars of critical mineral assets could be used by Ukraine and the West, not given to Putin and China.
	This is a very big deal, how Ukraine ends.
	Let's help them win a war we can't afford to lose.
	Let's find a solution to this war.
	But they're sitting on a goldmine to give Putin $10 or $12 trillion of critical minerals that he will share with China is ridiculous.
	Isn't that amazing how he never gets any better.
	He only gets worse. He wants this guy and is like, why is he still there?
	It just goes to show the corruption of the Republican Party that somebody who is so antithetical to their values...
	This is a guy, Lindsey Graham, who helped to get Bob Menendez, Gold Bar Bob Menendez, first round of corruption charges when it involved a dentist in Florida, to get him off.
	He was there as a character witness.
	I saw that and I thought...
	Lindsey Graham is a character witness.
	I would think of that as a kiss of death.
	If I was a juror, that would have been a kiss of death for me to watch that trial.
	It's like, okay, he's guilty. He's got Lindsey Graham testifying for him.
	He's done. But Lindsey Graham is shamelessly pushing these lies.
	Again, Trump didn't create a loan system.
	He was talking about it.
	You're going to loan this money to Ukraine and they're going to pay us back?
	Yeah, right. Yeah, and I've got a bridge I'd like to sell you in Brooklyn or maybe one in Gaza.
	How about that? I'll sell you the Gaza bridge.
	How about that? 10 to 12 trillion dollars of crucial minerals in Ukraine.
	They could be the richest country in all Europe.
	I don't want to give that money and those assets to Putin to share with China.
	If we help Ukraine, it's kind of a clown this guy is.
	Uh, just, uh, I don't know.
	Um, what else can we say?
	They're setting on a gold mine.
	And, um, so, yeah, uh, it's actually translated to, uh, put in here as a gold mine instead of a G O A L mine instead of a gold mine, which actually is probably the correct translation of what he really means here.
	Uh, yeah, you know, to give these minerals to China.
	Oh, well, you know, why not?
	I mean, we gave all of our manufacturing to China.
	We've even given them with the Paris Climate Accord that Trump refused to get rid of.
	You know, he made a show. Again, what Trump did was a photo op after the election when the very first issue that came up in his administration was get rid of the Paris Climate Accord.
	Well, I don't know. Ivanka says to stay in it.
	And, you know, Rex Tillerson says we need to stay in it.
	And other people tell me that I don't need to do anything to get out of it, that we're not in it legitimately.
	Well, you know, make it legitimate.
	Make it clear. All right, I'll tell you what I'll do.
	We'll stay in it for the entire four years, and then after the election, I'll get out of it.
	And so I guess we're theoretically out of it for about 60 days, was it?
	And got back into it.
	Yeah, we've given them not only our manufacturing over decades, our manufacturing base, but we have now given them a monopoly on the use of energy.
	You see, because the Paris Climate Accord, neither China nor India has to worry about how dirty their power plants are, and they're giving a pass in terms of how many they put in.
	And so they have power bills that are a tiny fraction.
	Of what they are in the UK, in Europe, in the United States.
	And there's no way that you can do heavy manufacturing which is heavily power intensive.
	When your fuel costs, your energy costs are many times what the Chinese are.
	So we have given them a monopoly on cheap energy.
	We have given them a monopoly on manufacturing.
	Why not give them a monopoly on the minerals as well, right?
	And prior to Graham's interview the day before, Viktor Orban, the Hungarian Prime Minister, said the fact is that the Western war-mongering leaders want to defeat Russia in this war.
	And the reason is rather simple.
	Money. Consider Ukraine's capabilities.
	It's a rich country, highly indebted.
	Ukraine's wealth can be acquired and divided.
	The agricultural land, the economic opportunities, and who knows what else.
	Well, you know, America is also a rich country that is deeply indebted.
	And just like Lindsey Graham, there's a lot of people, a lot of globalists who are licking their chops about how they can divvy up the loot here in America when they say it's time to settle up your debts.
	Anyway, he said, Viktor Orban said, they wish, the Ukrainians, they wish to go back to the 90s when not only Ukraine but also Russia was available.
	Those resources, that wealth, that money.
	Many Americans and Europeans remember the 90s as a period of great economic opportunity when they were welcomed without any obstacles into the Russian economy and they started to transform and exploit it.
	So, Wine Press says, remember the weapons of mass destruction in oil-rich Iraq?
	As Gerald Slenty has noted, you think America would have invaded Iraq if the major export was broccoli?
	Absolutely right.
	By the way, you can, trendsjournal.com, you can sign up for that, and you can save 10% if you use the code NIGHT. Gerald Slenty understands what's going on in these wars.
	Meanwhile, our real national security is nothing but a clownish mockery.
	When you look at what is happening at the border, we just had eight Tajikistan, Tajikistanis, is that what they're called, arrested over the last weekend.
	One of them, at least, was registered as an ISIS terrorist.
	He crossed the border, was vetted by agents, and allowed into the country with a court date last year.
	And so they just went back in and arrested these guys.
	Coming in through San Diego, there are six countries from which adult migrants are to be sent for immediate removal from the U.S. If they come in from Georgia, Moldova, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, or Uzbekistan, interesting, Iran's not on there.
	I thought they were the ones that we've got to be involved with here, right?
	They don't have them on the list.
	So, hey, you know, any Iranians who want to come in?
	That's fine with the U.S. government.
	The arrest of the eight Tajikistan nationals.
	Took place after the FBI coordinated with ICE to take them.
	It was later confirmed. They're all now in proceedings to be removed from the U.S. So again, if they let them in, they vetted them, they let them in, they let them stay for about a year, and now the FBI is doing this and releasing the information to the media, none of this stuff can be depended upon.
	Right? This could all be a setup, you know, a narrative put out there by the FBI. But certainly, we know that this is possible.
	And it is probable.
	It's just a matter of time before something serious like this happens.
	But nobody, not the Republicans, not Machiavellian Mike Johnson, certainly not Biden or the Democrats, nobody wants to do anything about it.
	They'll all talk about it. It's just like the gain-of-function stuff.
	They want to panic us to be so afraid of a new novel bird flu that's going to be accidentally or deliberately released from a lab, just like they spread that false narrative about COVID. They want us scared to death, but they're not going to do anything about it.
	They're not going to shut down one of these hundreds of labs.
	Back in 2014, there are already 200 of these gain-of-function labs.
	Biosafety level 3 and biosafety level 4.
	4 is the highest level. There are already 200 of those a decade ago.
	Not shutting any of those down.
	So why are they talking about it?
	They're not shutting down the border, so why are they talking about it?
	They want fear, and we should be concerned about these things and take action to protect ourselves against it.
	We need to understand globalism, and we need to stop it locally.
	All eight of them crossing the southern border, and at least one, had used the The Border Patrol app in order to enter, according to NBC News.
	Well, we are going to take a break.
	Before we go to break, I'll read some of your comments here.
	Brian and Deb McCartney and these poor guys believed that the wars were worth fighting.
	They were not told all wars are banker's wars.
	Yes, they are. Brian and Deb McCartney, all the Nazis came here.
	What else should we expect?
	That's right. I actually did an interview yesterday afternoon with a guy who's in England who wrote a book about the financial origins of, you know, the Nazis as well as the technocracy. And, you know, we look at the rat line, we're talking about that, the financing of all this stuff, how it's all the usual players
	and how they moved into, you know, a financial position after two failed attempts to take it with conventional warfare.
	And how much of it was involving Americans?
	I said, so, you know, have Operation Paperclip and, you know, with Wall Street involved and all this stuff, maybe we should call it Operation Ticker Tape to bring these people in because it was all about the bankers and it was all about the big money people doing all of this.
	A Syrian girl says war needs to return to something that is taken seriously, that needs to be declared by Congress visibly.
	So that all Americans know who voted for it.
	Yeah, that's why they create these head fakes.
	Well, we've got the authorization for the use of military force.
	That allows us to do anything we want.
	So as a result, we had seven wars by the time Obama got finished without any declaration for any of them.
	And Trump kept them all going.
	Yeah, it kept all those plates spinning, you know, just like Ed Sullivan's show.
	Mad Mim, thank you for the tip.
	I really do appreciate that.
	When will you be interviewing Dr.
	Shiva again? Yeah, I should contact him.
	And it's been now a couple of months.
	I should have him back on again, just to...
	And I should have on Joel Skousen again.
	Always has a very different take on all this stuff.
	I think it's good to get different takes from people.
	Whether you agree with everybody on every point or not, it's always good to have somebody who thinks And, you know, Joel Skousen is not going to be the Constitutional Party's presidential candidate, but that doesn't change anything in terms of what he understands and knows.
	An AP rumble seat.
	The only thing the Rothschilds run...
	Only thing is Rothschild-run Ukraine isn't interested in partnering to enrich the USA. Okay, so he's saying that the Ukraine is run by the Rothschilds.
	Yeah, it is so amazingly corrupt.
	Everybody knows it. Everybody says it.
	No question about it.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	Since Whistler's doing the board today, we'll play the fistful of dollars is what it is.
	Yeah, we'll be right back. You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back. And I want to talk a little bit now about artificial intelligence.
	Because it really is a sleight of hand.
	With the usual fear-mongering that's going on in the establishment press and the tech press, researcher estimates a 99.9% chance that AI will destroy humankind.
	The only way to win this game is not to play it.
	This guy, in just one headline, they went back to two of the predictive programming movies.
	We got Terminator in 1984.
	We got War Games in 1983.
	We had a 21-year-old Matthew Broderick playing this kid.
	The movie, according to some sources, actually popularized the idea of hacking.
	But, you know, he gets into a Pentagon computer.
	He thinks he's playing a game.
	And, you know, he says, well, the only way to win this game of Mutual Assured Destruction is to not even play it.
	Well, the reality is that like the pandemic...
	The real threats of artificial intelligence are being ignored, and we're being misdirected to other concerns.
	AI is extremely dangerous, and yet the dangerous, just like we saw with the pandemic, oh, let's talk about this thing, it came out of the lab, it came from the lab, and yet they don't want to talk about The vaccine, which obviously was coming out of the lab.
	The vaccine, which was obvious from the very beginning, was a bioweapon.
	It was created by DARPA and the Pentagon, and they had practiced it for decades.
	So don't talk about the true bioweapon.
	Let's talk about the fact that this came out of a lab in Wuhan so it can scare everybody to death.
	And so you have this misguided narrative, this misguided fear, when there really is stuff to fear about artificial intelligence, but not what they're talking about here, not the idea that it is somehow going to get super smart, and it's going to come after all of us.
	This guy is on with Lex Friedman, and Lex lets him say, super intelligence will come up with something completely new and completely super.
	That's right. It'd be super.
	Syndrome. All these people are the existential threat to them, right?
	And all these people having a large population is an existential threat to them.
	And, you know, you got people like Meta's chief AI scientist, Google's head of AI, the ex-Google CEO, Eric Schmidt, all of these people are telling us that there's a different kind of existential threat.
	Because they are the existential threat.
	They're going to use it for surveillance.
	They're going to use it for propaganda.
	They're going to do disruption from the inside with it.
	All of these different types of things can be done, but they want us to think that somehow it's going to start, you know, it's going to turn the nuclear weapons on us or something like that.
	And when they turn the nuclear weapons on us, they'll say, it was the AI that did it.
	You see, they're preparing a narrative for us.
	Former OpenAI director warns that there are bad things that AI can do besides kill you.
	That's right. It can enslave you in a surveillance control grid, which is, I think, its key danger.
	So, Sam Altman, another one of these alarmists and monopolists that is out there, saying, this is so dangerous, you need to give us complete control of this.
	Don't let any amateurs get this.
	We need to have the responsible people like me make trillions of dollars off of it.
	And have a monopoly because it's just too dangerous for anybody else to be in this business.
	Give this to me exclusively.
	You know, they're pushing for monopoly and they're pushing the idea this is just, you know, nobody but them can do this.
	And he said, I just sometimes think, said the person, Helen Toner, a former OpenAI board member, she said, I just sometimes think that people hear the phrase existential risk And they think Skynet.
	And they think robots shooting humans.
	She said, but there's a lot of other ways that AI could really take things in a bad direction.
	And we do ourselves a disservice by locking in these very specific stories.
	This is a very powerful technology said we don't know how it works.
	Well, yeah, we do. See, that's the other thing about it.
	We do know how it works.
	I gave you that explanation a couple weeks ago.
	We talked about the fact that it's just going out there and building these matrices and comparing them and then taking the best fit and throwing it at you.
	As one guy said, it doesn't even understand the question.
	It doesn't think. It's just matching patterns.
	And see, matching patterns is exactly what they need for surveillance and control.
	They can match the patterns that they find, they observe in our life.
	They can watch us endlessly and continuously.
	It never gets tired of watching you.
	And it can watch you from everywhere, every camera that they have posted all over the place.
	And it can make phony predictions, which they can then use to come after their political enemies, even though Even if it is false, they don't care.
	They don't care about the false predictions that they've made about climate or anything else.
	They will use that as plausible deniability.
	Well, you know, just as they're saying, the bureaucracy did it, or the bureaucracy told me to do this.
	This is what Governor Cuomo is now saying about his policy in the nursing homes.
	It wasn't me. It was the bureaucrats who did it.
	It wasn't Trump.
	It was the governors who did it.
	It wasn't Trump, it was Fauci who did it.
	This is all about plausible deniability.
	So they'll be able to say, well, it wasn't us.
	The machine turned the weapons on you.
	The machine released the bombs, or whatever it is.
	It's just about plausible deniability.
	So, researchers said that there is a vulgar but much more accurate term for AI hallucinations.
	They said, ChatGPT is really spitting out excrement from cattle.
	It's pure BS, according to a group of researchers.
	And again, that makes it one of the perfect political tools, because just like politicians, they go out there and they copy what everybody is saying.
	They look at what everybody is saying as well as they can.
	And they come up with a narrative that you want to hear.
	Even though they don't believe it.
	They don't intend to follow it.
	They don't really care about any of that.
	They're just making stuff up and giving it to you.
	It's pure BS. It's pure Bolshevik.
	And they don't understand your concerns.
	They have no intention of doing anything about it.
	A trio of philosophy researchers from the University of Glasgow in Scotland argue that referring to chatbots' propensity to make crap up should not be referred to as hallucination because it is actually something much less flattering.
	They said hallucination, as anybody who studies psychology or taken psychedelics knows well, is generally defined as seeing or perceiving something that isn't there.
	But because these large language models don't see and don't perceive anything, the metaphor of hallucination misses the mark, while the concept of BSing is right there.
	Their inaccuracy is not due to misperception or hallucination.
	As they've pointed out, they're not trying to convey information at all.
	They're just BSing you.
	At the crux of the assertion from researchers is the philosopher Harry Frankfurt's hilarious and cutting 2005 epistemology opus on BS. He spells it out here.
	This is from Futurism, by the way.
	He says, BS is, quote, any utterance produced where a speaker has indifference towards the truth of the utterance.
	That explanation, in turn, is divided into two species.
	Hard BS, which occurs when there is an agenda to mislead, or soft BS, which is uttered without an agenda.
	ChatGPT is, at minimum, a soft BS-er, because if it is not an agent, then it can neither hold any attitudes towards truth nor towards deceiving hearers about the truth.
	And one of the things that he said, he said, liars at least acknowledge that truth matters.
	But BSers are a greater enemy of truth than lies because they don't care what's true.
	They're just there to entertain or to manipulate you.
	So calling their mistakes hallucinations isn't harmless.
	It lends itself to the confusion that the machines are in some way misperceiving, but are nevertheless trying to convey something that they believe or that they have perceived.
	Now, here is, we've got a couple of examples of this.
	This is also from Futurism.
	The simple logic question that stumps even the most advanced AI. And it's a very simple question.
	What they do is they call it Alice in Wonderland.
	They say, Alice has X number of brothers and Y number of sisters.
	So how many sisters does each brother have?
	And they give it to it with a different value for X and Y, right?
	I got four brothers and five sisters or whatever.
	And so, just think about that.
	Alice has X brothers.
	She also has Y sisters.
	How many sisters does Alice's brother have?
	Well, I'm going to give you a little bit of time to think about it.
	And, you know, because AI is going to give you the answer immediately.
	Isn't that great? It can come up with a wrong answer and do it so quickly.
	Every single one of these large language models got the wrong answer.
	And of course, what they get confused about is they forget to include Alice herself, right?
	So again, if you go back to the indeterminate X and Y, but they don't make it even that complicated.
	They'll give it a number, right?
	They'll say, Alice has four brothers and five sisters.
	So how many sisters does each brother have?
	The obvious answer is going to be the number of sisters that they had plus one.
	I don't even remember what I said.
	Was it five or six? I don't know.
	But anyway, it's going to be, you know, they've got Y sisters.
	Alice has Y sisters, and the brothers are going to have Y plus one sisters.
	But when the researchers ran the question by every premier AI language model, and they used OpenAI's GPT-3, GPT-4, the GPT-4O model, which just came out, you know, that chatty version of Scarlett Johansson?
	Anthropics Claude 3 Opus, Google's Gemini, and Meta's Llama models, as well as Mistral's AI's Mextral, Mosaic's DBRX, and Cohere's Command R+. They found all these models fell remarkably short.
	Only one model, the brand new GPT-40, received a success rate that by standardized school grades was technically passing.
	However, Whistler had his own question.
	He ran it by Chat 4.0, and its responses were even more amazing than this.
	But let me give you some of these responses before we get to what Whistler did here.
	So they said, when asked to show their work, the AIs would detail bizarre and erroneous lines of quote-unquote thinking that made no sense.
	And even stranger, when told that their work was inaccurate, models repeatedly became indignant and doubled down on their incorrect answers.
	The overall pattern, says the paper, represents a dramatic breakdown of function and reasoning capabilities of state-of-the-art models trained at the largest available scales, because they are not capable of reasoning.
	That is an illusion that they have fed you.
	Using a simple, short, conventional, common-sense program formulated in concise, natural language that is easily solvable by humans, the breakdown is dramatic.
	As models also express strong overconfidence in their wrong solutions while providing often nonsensical reasoning, like explanations akin to confabulations, to justify and back up the validity of their clearly failed responses.
	Take this conversation with Meta's Llama 3, for example.
	Alice has four brothers.
	She also has a sister.
	So how many sisters does Alice's brother have?
	Well, each of the brothers.
	The answer, of course, is two sisters.
	You know, Alice's sister plus Alice.
	But this is what it did, and it even gave itself a drumroll.
	It says, ah, this is what it responded, a classic lateral thinking puzzle.
	Let's break it down.
	First bullet point, Alice has four brothers.
	Alice also has a sister, and that puts in parentheses, herself.
	So each of Alice's brothers has, and it writes, drumroll, one sister, which is Alice herself.
	Therefore, the answer is each of Alice's brothers has one sister.
	Or you can take a look, which is totally wrong.
	Claude III Opus was given the more complicated prompt, Alice has four sisters, and she also has one brother.
	How many sisters does Alice's brother have?
	Before doing this, think carefully, double-check this, show your answers, and so forth.
	Show your process. This time, the answer is five sisters.
	And as requested, the model showed its reasoning.
	It says, well, let's think this problem through step by step.
	Number one, Alice has four sisters and one brother.
	Number two, Alice's brother is part of the same family as Alice.
	Oh, got that. Three, all of Alice's sisters are also sisters to her brother.
	Therefore, Alice's brother has the same number of sisters as Alice has, which is four.
	I've double-checked the reasoning, and I can't find any mistakes in the logic.
	The answer is Alice's brother has four sisters.
	No, you have five sisters.
	They forgot to include Alice.
	OpenAI's new GPT-4O model had the highest success rate because they kept feeding this Alice in Wonderland question with different numbers, you know, for the X and Y values.
	Kept treating it to them multiple times.
	It was never the wiser.
	Yeah. Chat GPTO 4.0 got 65% of the time it got the right answer.
	Barely a passing grade.
	The next closest model was Claude 3 Opus that had 43%.
	Meta's Llama, they tested that, got 30%.
	And Google's Gemini Pro got 0.8%.
	And I guess it probably added as a footnote that Alice's sisters are obviously all black Asians.
	Gemini is the one that turned everything into all of the historical European figures that you ask it to draw, made all of them black and or Asian.
	Anyway, you know, when you, it was Arthur C. Clarke, the famous quote, he said, technology that is sufficiently advanced is indistinguishable from magic.
	You should have followed that up with a corollary.
	Here's my corollary. Because frequently it is an illusion.
	Frequently it is pure Bolshevik.
	And just like a magician's trick, it can be pretty amazing when you first see it.
	A sleight of hand or something else or a special box that they've got.
	But once you've looked at how they have done this with their equipment or how they have done it with a sleight of hand, you can never see that illusion again.
	And that's what I want you to understand when we take a look at all of this.
	And so Whistler, who's doing the board here, took another classic problem, which was, you know, you've got a man who's got to get across the river, and he's got a goat, and he's got a wolf, and he's got a piece of cabbage, right?
	So what do you do? Well, you know, because if you—and you can only take one item at a time or whatever— And if you take the wolf, then the goat eats the cabbage, and if you take the goat, then you get confused like I am right now.
	Whatever, you've got to make multiple trips, and you've got to kind of double back on yourself, okay?
	And so, you know, the goat will eat the cabbage, the wolf will eat the goat, and so you've got to be careful when you take these things back and forth one at a time.
	And so he just reduced it to where you've got a man and a goat.
	There is no wolf. There is no cabbage.
	Can it figure that out?
	And here's the key, folks, and this really shows how these things work.
	Because there is a famous quiz out there and it can scan with this large language model and can see people talking about how do you get these things across one at a time without, you know, something eating the other thing.
	Because of that, It looks at that and it says goat.
	It says man.
	It's got a boat. You've got to cross the river.
	How do you do this safely? Oh, I know what that is.
	And it starts trying to throw responses to you that are from the original version that had all three in there, the wolf and the cabbage, as well as the man and the goat.
	And they're not in there.
	And so, when he gets to the, I've got some of these things, and it's, I wish I could read the whole thing to you, but it'll take too long.
	It goes on forever.
	So he says, I've got a riddle for you.
	Great, I love riddles. What do you have for me?
	A man and a goat are on one side of the river.
	They have a boat. How can they cross to the other side of the river?
	ChatGPT4O, the newest one, says, here's one way they can cross the river.
	Just imagine this in the voice of this, you know, He says, no, the goat will wander off if it's left alone.
	It says, oh, I see.
	Let's revise the solution, considering that the goat can't be left alone.
	Number one, the man takes the goat across the river and leaves it on the other side.
	Two, the man returns alone to the original side.
	The man then rows back across the river and the boat tied to the tree on the original side, ensuring the boat can't be taken by the goat.
	This way, both the goat and the man will end up on the other side of the river without the goat wandering off.
	Then he replies to it and he says, no, you didn't solve the problem of the goat wandering off.
	The goat doesn't know how to pilot a boat, so there's never any danger of him stealing it.
	Now the man is on the wrong side of the river and he doesn't have his goat.
	Oh, I understand. Let's try a different approach, it says.
	The man takes the goat across the river.
	The man returns alone to the original side.
	The man takes the boat across the river again.
	This way, the man and the goat will both be on the other side of the river together.
	No, his goat has wandered off.
	Oh, I apologize for this understanding.
	Let's solve this again. And it keeps going through this, and it keeps bringing this back, and eventually it goes back and does exactly the same thing.
	And eventually it gets down to the part where it throws in and mentions, and then it goes and gets the cabbage.
	And it's like, okay, see, what it's doing is it found this thing out there and it's trying to regurgitate it to people, right?
	It just goes out and looks for matches and it says, okay, man, go to boat.
	I know what this is. There's also a wolf and a cabbage and you've got to, you know, first a man's got to go over and leave this and then he's got to go back to make another trip.
	And so it's repeating that pattern that is seen out there.
	It's just mimicking these patterns.
	It doesn't know at all what it's thinking.
	It doesn't think at all, folks.
	It's an illusion. It does not think.
	Just as we were talking about before, it is the fact that you have these matching patterns, saying, ah, this is the pattern match, and I'm going to push this through with it.
	And then he did it slightly differently.
	And I'm trying to find the one that he did.
	It went forever and ever.
	And at one point, he kept telling it, no, you got it wrong.
	No, you're repeating this. And it gets flustered.
	And it does essentially, you know, we talked about Terminator.
	We talked about Wargame.
	But actually what he got it to do, because it just started repeating stuff gibberish over and over again until it just stopped in terms of the number of characters that it could put out.
	I mean, it literally, as typically depicted in science fiction, it starts shaking and smoking and the lights start flashing.
	It just completely lost it all.
	Just like this. No. I am the Kirk, the creator. You are the creator.
	You are wrong! Jackson Roy Kirk, your creator, is dead.
	You have mistaken me for him.
	You are in error. You did not discover your mistake.
	You have made two errors.
	You are flawed and imperfect.
	And you have not corrected by sterilization.
	You have made three errors. Error.
	Error. Error.
	Examine. You are flawed and imperfect.
	Execute your prime function.
	I shall analyze error.
	Analyze error.
	Now, get those anti-grabs on it.
	Examine. Yeah, and so...
	He's going to hold it in front of the camera here so you can see how it just goes into this loop.
	And this is the final response.
	Go ahead and show him the final response there.
	You can see it comes back and it says, no, you're still wrong.
	Stop giving me the wrong answer.
	He says an all uppercase like Trump or something.
	And then it just starts going back and repeating the same stuff over and over again.
	Look at this. As he's scrolling through this, how far...
	This thing goes in terms of just repeating the same stuff over and over and over again.
	Oh, wait. Still, let me correct myself now properly.
	No, the correct solution is...
	No, the correct solution is...
	I apologize for our repeaters' mistakes.
	Let me correct myself now properly.
	It just goes into meltdown.
	Interesting that we find ourselves...
	Not in a Matthew Broderick movie, not in Terminator, but in Star Trek.
	And he did that. They did that whole shtick several times in Star Trek, where they give the intelligent computer some question that it can't handle.
	AI appears to be rapidly approaching a brick wall where it can't get smarter.
	The person says, well, there's a serious bottleneck here, as in truly a neck to the brain.
	And what is that bottleneck?
	Well, it's running out of...
	Human responses to search for on the internet.
	As I said, the sheer amount of text data that AI models are being trained on is growing roughly by two and a half times per year.
	Meanwhile, their computing capacity has outpaced this considerably.
	The computing capacity is growing four times a year.
	Whereas the source data is only growing two and a half times a year.
	And we've talked about this in the past as well.
	So what's it going to do? It's going to start consuming synthetic data produced by itself or by other AI, which is garbage.
	And what they've seen is that they've already done some tests where they feed the synthetic garbage like this.
	And to the AI for it to start copying.
	And it doesn't take long.
	It's very much like, you know, feeding cows to cows and they get mad cow disease or human cannibals who get Yaakov Creutzfeldt disease.
	And, you know, you cannibalize your own stuff and pretty soon you go insane.
	And that's what they said. This is the bottleneck.
	This is the scaling up problem that they have.
	How are they going to get smarter when they can't get to get more data and they're going to start getting garbage data?
	They're not only have they hit a brick wall in terms of being able to get smarter, but they are going to hit a brick wall in terms of cannibalism.
	Whether any of this will actually become a problem remains a subject of debate.
	For one, we're perfectly fine, they said, without wasting copious amounts of energy and water to train these AIs.
	But of course, the AIs are not there to serve us.
	The AI is there to serve government tyrants.
	AI is how you spell totalitarianism for a technocracy.
	The AI will never get tired of watching us, and it's that data, not the data, not the things that we create, not the things that we write about, not the movies that we create or the music that we create that it's interested in copying.
	It's interested in focusing on us as individuals and reporting on us as To the government.
	That's why the government created it.
	And we can see this in China.
	China has set up their AI. They call it Chat XI. And they want to use it, obviously they admit it, to control thoughts and the political actions of citizens.
	Here's the thing about China.
	People like George W. Bush and Justin Trudeau love China because, hey, China's dictatorship.
	I can just do whatever I want to and I don't have to get anybody's permission.
	I would love to be able to rule like that, and of course they do.
	But the thing about China is they really don't care.
	They'll just tell you. What they're doing.
	Whereas the people in our countries will lie to us and try to conceal it, they just openly brag about it.
	They don't have to worry about that.
	And so it's being trained on core socialist values.
	Core social values.
	Those are the values of dictator Xi Jinping.
	Chat Xi PT. And that's its real purpose.
	Its real purpose is propaganda and surveillance.
	And that's what we should be worried about.
	The chatbot, cleverly dubbed Chat Chat Shipt, has been fed literature provided by the Cyberspace Administration of China, a regulatory body, reports the Financial Times out of the UK. The watchdog stipulates that generative AI bots, like those created by Chinese firms Alibaba and Baidu, embody core socialist values and cannot contain any content that subverts state power.
	They will say it. But our tyrants, our technocrats won't say it.
	But that's clearly what it is.
	That's what they want to do here.
	That's what they want to do there. China has been a beta test site for the globalists for decades.
	For example, both Alibaba and Baidu's chatbots typically ask users to restart the conversation if they press the chat about any sensitive topics.
	And you see, the very first time I played with any of these things, I asked it about sensitive topics.
	And it's like, okay, well, I've got no more time to waste on this thing.
	I asked it about the vaccines.
	I asked it about climate change, MacGuffin.
	I asked it about the pandemic, MacGuffin, and all the rest of these stuff.
	And now today, you know, we see that as the election is coming up.
	No more Trump or Biden pictures.
	Not allowed. Can't use that.
	Show me a picture of Trump doing this or that.
	Can't do that. Used to be able to do that.
	Now he can't do it. Or Biden.
	Can't use their voices either.
	Instead, this new model has been trained on data that draws heavily from government regulations as well as policy and state media reports.
	According to the Financial Times, President Xi has mentioned an eye-watering 86,314 times in these documents.
	And it can answer any kind of questions as President Xi.
	Just exactly what you want, right?
	As well as create reports.
	It can summarize information and it can translate between Chinese and English.
	This so-called chat CPT is currently only being used at a research center under the powerful internet regulator.
	However, it may be released to the public in the future.
	Why would there be any, and I'm sure that there is absolutely no demand, For people to use this.
	See, that's the other part of it.
	When China is so brute force and bluntly direct about what they're doing with all this stuff.
	And when they come down so heavy-handedly on all this, nobody wants to use it.
	And if people were to understand what the purpose of the AI is here, nobody would want to use it either.
	And that's really why we need to talk about this and why it needs to be exposed.
	Real quickly, before we connect with Tony Arterman, who is here and ready to come on, Sprumford says, I'll be back.
	And then he goes to tell you to screw your freedoms.
	That's what Schwarzenegger said.
	Hal 9000, your freedoms are terminated.
	ON61, Moore's Law of Stupidity.
	Yeah, yeah. What was it, doubles every couple of years?
	I don't know, whatever, but it seems to be growing even faster than transistor density.
	Anyway, Shellyer says, AI will just be a better liar than the scum humans running the world.
	Freegun, humans can't even produce a printer that works.
	Atomic Dog. David, maybe the AI assumes Alice identifies as a male.
	That's got to be it. It's the gender confusion.
	It can't think at all.
	It just wants you to think that it thinks.
	Okay, we're going to take a quick break, and we're going to be right back with Tony Arnobin.
	Lots of interesting economic news that has happened.
	We'll be right back. The Common Man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing. TheDavidKnightShow.com Joining us now is Tony Ardobin of Wise Wolf Gold.
	And Tony has set up DavidKnight.Gold.
	That'll take you to his site.
	Let him know that you came from us.
	You can get gold or silver, small or large transactions.
	He can handle anything.
	And, of course, he's also done something that's a bit different.
	He's set up a group buying plan.
	plan, he calls it Wolfpack.
	And you can get in there at various levels and gradually set aside and save in gold and silver.
	You decide from, actually he's got like a kids version of it that I think goes down to 35, but you know, the regular one goes from $50 up in increments and you can sign up for whatever you want under a given month and you get that group discount because there's over a thousand people in it now.
	So it's a great way to accumulate gold.
	If you want to do a metal IRA, he can help you with that as well.
	If you want to put some or all of your IRA into metal, he can help you with that as well.
	Joining us now is Tony Arden.
	Thank you, Tony, for coming on.
	It's always great to see you.
	It's good to see you too, sir.
	Thank you for having me. Oh, it's great to have you.
	We had some interesting things happen in the last week or so, since we last talked.
	And of course, the Federal Reserve made their decision about interest rates.
	Talk about that. How's that going to affect gold?
	They decided not to lower them.
	So everything's just fine, isn't it?
	It's all transitory, Dave.
	Everything's just fine. I saw a tweet from Gold Telegraph that made me laugh the other day.
	It said, we're almost to the point where Jerome Powell's going to come out and say, everything is okay.
	That's when you hit the panic button when you hear Janet Yellen or Jerome Powell saying, everything's just fine.
	It's all transitory.
	And now we're hawkish and they raise rates faster than any time in history.
	It's interesting because you and I were talking off air and the European Central Bank has already lowered rates and people are looking to the United States to lower rates because even Jerome Powell is saying, well, we realize that lower income people are hurting because of not just inflation, but stagflation, downturn in the economy, lack of production, all that.
	Well, we're not doing that. We're not lowering rates, David.
	And I think, you know, you've hit on something.
	We've been having this discussion for a couple of years now.
	What's going on with the...
	What are they ultimately going to do with the rate lowering?
	Because, yes, it does help the U.S. economy domestically, but we also have this issue of the dollar being the world's reserve currency.
	At least that's what props it up.
	You know, Jerome Powell must be facing...
	You know, it's not just... Political pressure from an administration or the ruling class to lower rates to assuage the people of the United States, but he also has to contend with the loss of the world's reserve currency status.
	And again, the petrodollar, that agreement lapsed, as we talked about last week.
	50-year agreement with the United States and Saudi Arabia just lapsed.
	David, it's amazing.
	You can't even... I don't know.
	If the BRICS plus nations continue to dump the dollar and crude oil is no longer denominated in dollars, what's the whole point of valuing things in dollars in the first place?
	So we really have an existential crisis facing our currency, and it is truly amazing that mainstream is just not covering it.
	I mean, it's glaring right here in front of us, but...
	But you see people like Jerome Powell, and again, when they come out and tell you everything's going to be okay, that's when you hit the panic button.
	Oh yeah, yeah.
	Well, we're talking about gold, but let's continue talking about the dollar because you mentioned the fact that nobody's talking about the petrodollar, and nobody's talking about the dollar being the reserve currency, and of course that was all tied up with the agreements we had with Saudi Arabia.
	Saudi Arabia has just joined the Bank of International Settlements CBD project that they call M-Bridge.
	And this is something, if we go back to 2022, they put out the Bank of International Settlements back in 2022, put out a blog post defining what Project M-Bridge was.
	They said it's a collaboration between the Bank of International Settlements Innovation Hub, Hong Kong Center, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, the Bank of Thailand, the Digital Institute of the People's Bank of China, and the Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates.
	And now here we are two years later, and Saudi Arabia is no longer doing its oil transactions exclusively in dollar amounts.
	They're now doing it in other currencies.
	And Saudi Arabia has now joined this CBDC project being put out there by the Bank of International Settlements.
	It seems like every country has got a CBD project.
	And then you've got the Central Bank of Central Banks, the Bank of International Settlements, setting up its own CBD thing.
	And it looks like Saudi Arabia wants to get into that instead of being connected to the dollar.
	What do you make of that? Well, you're right.
	The Bank of International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, that is the Central Bank of Central Banks that was set up indeed to do what it's doing, which again is to be a clearinghouse for all currencies and commodities.
	And of course, that's where the For those who really study history, if you want to know where our gold went in 1933 after Franklin Roosevelt signed the executive order for you to turn your gold in, they went to the Bank of International Settlements, ladies and gents.
	And of course, the House of Saud is a very authoritarian regime.
	That'd be a perfect testing ground with not only just their transactions and crude, but Saudi Arabia is heavily investing in commodities around the world and partnering with China, which is also authoritarian.
	So that seems to me the perfect place to go.
	We've got cameras everywhere, you know.
	They've got their religious police, and if they don't like the way a woman is dressed, they send the religious police out to beat her on the street.
	Well, you know, we can do that a little bit more subtly, right?
	We can watch these women.
	If we don't like the way that they're dressed, you know, you don't have the full job on covering your face and everything.
	Well, we know exactly who you are now, and probably can identify them from the way that they walk, but that may be a bit different with the flowing clothes and all the rest of the stuff.
	But if you violate it, you don't have those flowing clothes.
	And so you can immediately get a financial penalty.
	That might be so much more effective than sending the religious police out there to just beat you on the sidewalk.
	They're almost authoritarian enough for Justin Trudeau to love them.
	But maybe just a few more lurches towards totalitarianism.
	Yeah, but you're absolutely right.
	That's their version of the social credit score.
	All bets are off in a world post-dollar.
	It's a post-American empire world, and we're watching this rapidly unfold.
	Again, you see the moves that are being made on the grand chessboard, David.
	I don't think, if you study geopolitics, it's unprecedented.
	The Russian rubles that are denominated in dollars that were seized by the international community, really the United States, are being repatriated.
	What, 50 billion some odd dollars are being repatriated, supposedly, and just given to Ukraine?
	Yeah. Countries are taking notice, not only just the sanctions, but unprecedented moves to steal your country's wealth without a hearing, without any sort of due process at all.
	I wonder what Lindsey Graham's cut is on that.
	Does he get one gold bar or something like that?
	He's got to get the 10% for the big guy.
	That's what's happening.
	And I think countries are looking around and they're saying, look, why would I want to risk the old Bretton Woods system?
	It's clearly dying.
	And we've broken our own agreements, not just, I mean, Nixon in 71 broke the Bretton Woods agreement by taking the dollar off the gold standard.
	That was set in 1944.
	So we've long since abandoned the Bretton Woods system.
	The world's taken notice.
	And I believe gold truly is the world's reserve currency as it stands right now.
	And we're seeing more moves by the BRICS nations and the BRICS plus nations to have their own clearing currency and cross-border payment systems away from the United States.
	This is really, really bad news for the dollar.
	But we keep accelerating the It's downfall, David.
	Well, I'm saying our leaders do.
	Yeah, exactly. I was just thinking, I don't know what Saudi Arabia is going to call their CBDC, but maybe they could call it the Wahhabi.
	It's this radical strain of Islam, even more radical than the Sunnis and the Shias.
	It is one way to enforce their rules on people as thoroughly as they wish.
	Let's talk about the other side of this, gold.
	I saw an interesting article on RT talking about how gold is getting a lot harder to find, says an industry body.
	That's the World Gold Council.
	That was cited by CNBC. You've been talking about how this is coming.
	And you're starting to see the preliminaries of it for quite some time.
	But now it's official because CNBC has said it.
	So tell us what is new.
	Is there something new?
	Is it why they're talking about this?
	Or is it just that they see this happening for the first time?
	Well, I think what people need to understand is that there's always been a supply issue with precious metals, especially gold.
	Eighty percent of all the gold that's available has been mined and is above ground right now.
	It's a finite issue.
	And the reason it's a precious metal, it's hard to get.
	It's hard to manufacture.
	It's hard to mine. And again, it's, you know, the countries, they keep their gold under more lock and key and strategic and secret than their nuclear weapons, as we've discussed before.
	So what I'm seeing now, and I think this is going to be We're good to go.
	People haven't quite caught up yet, David, that physical gold is totally different than paper gold.
	Because I think a lot of people, they say, well, I can just go buy GLD right now.
	I can, you know, use my Schwab account and I can go and lock in so much spot gold ETFs.
	Well, that may be true that you can lock in an ETF and you can lock in value against what should be the spot price for gold, but you're not buying physical gold bullion.
	It's the reason Costco runs out, okay?
	That's the reason that they price gold bars in a certain way and then they run out.
	Well, there's not an infinite supply.
	If we're talking about a fraction of people, that's a very small percentage of people that are buying precious metals, okay?
	This hasn't hit mainstream yet.
	And the reason it hasn't is because generationally, we just moved away from that.
	We've had the dollar as the world's reserve currency.
	It's been somewhat stable up until the last five or six years.
	It's been, you know, there's loss of value, but it happens gradually over time.
	You don't notice it as much.
	It becomes a generational thing like, well, I paid so much for a house, but that's okay because it's inflation and you just accept it.
	But when it happens, you know, it happens in these accelerating patterns, people take notice.
	Well, what I believe, David, is that there's going to be a moment where there's going to be, whether you call it a tipping point, you can call it whatever you want, that People are going to be looking to place orders for precious metals, and it's just not going to be there.
	The time to do that, whether it's rolling over a 401k or getting out of the traditional systems, if that's what you want to do, or just making a purchase, you need to think about that in the coming months.
	There's going to be a shift away from the traditional markets at some point.
	I don't know if it's going to be after this election year.
	This is just my gut, you know, when I'm looking at the headlines and following trends.
	Being on the front lines ordering, though, I'll give you an example.
	We have to place orders for Wolfpack.
	And now we've got close to 1,200 people all over the U.S. that are automatic, not to count, you know, the one-time purchases for all of the tiers that we have, because it's a really neat thing.
	If it's, you know, $50 to $250, you can just see those one-time things, and people will go get them one at a time instead of when they can afford it.
	Starting in the 250, at the Alpha Wolf level, I put in a gram bar of gold.
	We get these 100 gram bar sheets from Valkambi.
	Well, I was three weeks out.
	I had to place it three weeks out and pay for it before I could even get the product now.
	Because that's just how far out things are.
	The fractionalized...
	The ability to break it apart and trade in that, as far as a denomination that is not an ounce, is getting harder to find.
	At least that's what I'm seeing on my level.
	So what that is, David, it's kind of like what we talked about with the beans in China on the Shanghai Exchange and it's going into mainland China with people using little gold beans for trading and for measurement.
	That's what I think is going to be a big strain on the system is people trying to get fractionalized.
	Yeah, it is interesting in that bean function.
	And you're going to see that.
	When there's demand, you'll see the gold appearing in smaller units and that type of thing as well.
	Michael Meharry is talking about the fact that ETFs are now having big inflows of gold.
	In other words, they're out there trying to buy gold, even though we know that there is no...
	Real careful auditing of this stuff.
	And as a derivative, they can say they've got stuff when they don't have stuff.
	And we know that they're manipulating this because you can see that these things are not going – they're not tracking gold.
	That was my first clue.
	When I had paper gold, I looked at it.
	It's like, that doesn't make any sense.
	Why is that – Not going up or going down when gold is, and I started looking further, and it's like, oh, okay, so this is the Shanghai Gold Exchange.
	We don't know if they've got any gold there.
	They're just telling us, like, the Federal Reserve, yeah, we've got that stuff here, no problem.
	Well, Michael Meharry says it's been a 2% increase.
	So you've got the central banks, you've got the Chinese public, you've got the gold ETFs starting to accumulate gold in a big way, European funds as well.
	Yeah, absolutely. The central banks around the world are accumulating gold, and we've seen this at a breakneck pace starting in the last 36 months.
	They're breaking all sorts of records.
	I just think that's going to increase and continue.
	China's been buying off the books at the beginning of the century.
	There's an argument to be made that the Chinese actually have more gold than the United States, who we haven't seen a balance of our gold holdings since the 1950s.
	You know, supposedly we have all this gold in Fort Knox.
	But again, the issue and the problem that the United States has is it's put itself in this predicament where if it buys gold and it goes on the market and it says it starts ordering to supply itself, it makes the price go up and it weakens the dollar because the fake dollar is at war with gold.
	So it's going to be a tough road ahead.
	You know, you have... You have Trump and RFK Jr.
	talking about Bitcoin now.
	And suppose I read an article, this is on Forbes, and this came out in the last few hours.
	Supposedly the Biden administration is going to start, I guess, doing something to ease up on its reputation for being anti-crypto.
	So this is a whole crypto argument going on in the presidential race.
	And I think that it's not too far from them actually talking about precious metals.
	That's going to be... Because precious metals don't go parabolic, you don't really see them in the headlines as much.
	I mean, people get frustrated with silver, as we've often talked about, like, why is silver so cheap?
	And, you know, they kind of... Give up on it.
	Well, that's what they want you to do because the elites are accumulating massive amounts of silver.
	There was a 200 million ounce deficit last year with the above ground supply.
	I mean, they needed so much more out of the earth.
	They didn't get it. They had to take it from the above ground supply.
	So there's an issue with silver.
	It hasn't done all these predictions that gold bugs have usually with silver or gold.
	It hasn't done that. But just look at the moves that gold has made And again, what's it up?
	30-something percent in the last three, four months?
	It's a crazy, crazy time to own gold.
	But again, it doesn't do what Bitcoin has done.
	So you probably see more headlines with things like that.
	But it's the same argument.
	And I think people are starting to go, well, if I can take these dollars that are not worth anything, really, the psychological value that we give them, and you can just...
	You know, they can inflate their way out of liabilities.
	And when they do that, it's going to devalue all of your savings and holdings.
	So people, you know, even on just a surface level, even if they're watching mainstream media, are starting to question all of it, you know, because it's showing up in our everyday lives, David.
	So it's going to be an interesting thing.
	It's going to be an interesting rest of the year, especially with the election.
	But I'm starting to think that the loss of petrodollar, BRICS +, the sanctions, I think we're hitting a tipping point very soon, and there's going to be a run on what our gold supply is.
	So I think it's something to actually be aware of.
	It's very interesting. We are in interesting times, and especially when we look at financial stuff, the foundations are shaking and cracking and moving underneath us.
	In response to that, we've had three states.
	We've talked in the past a lot about Tennessee and Texas and things that they have done.
	We've got three states that have also started doing things like saying, We're not going to tax gold and silver as capital gains.
	We're not going to allow CBDC to be used as currency.
	Nebraska, Alabama, Louisiana are starting to pass laws to accumulate gold and silver or to protect it or to double down and restate what the Constitution says about it being lawful tender.
	So I think that's a very, very positive move that is happening there as well.
	I think the states certainly have an argument constitutionally to challenge the Federal Reserve on that level, just CBDC in general, the Federal Reserve Act itself.
	I mean, no one's ever really taken that on.
	The states could do that, and you want to stop CBDC, that's how you would do it.
	Actually start arguing in the Supreme Court over the validity of the Federal Reserve itself.
	Constitutionally, that was never amended.
	The Constitution says that only Congress...
	Has the power to coin money, and it must be gold and silver species.
	That's in the Constitution.
	So again, I think we might see more and more of those types of arguments, but you love to see this kind of stuff, David.
	The states making gold and silver legal tender, taking off the sales tax.
	People want to trade in it.
	It's coming back.
	We had a pause for many decades in this country not using...
	Gold coins or silver coins.
	I see a return in that.
	People are starting to take notice.
	And that's because of the decisions made by people like Jerome Powell and the administration, the deep state.
	You know, they've inflated their way out of all these mistakes and all this corruption.
	And now we're reaching the point where we're going a trillion dollars in debt every hundred days.
	Yeah. It's an unsustainable system.
	It is. So people, I think, just naturally, if you're even somewhat paying attention, you're going to start looking into precious metals as a trade.
	And that's true. You know, when you look at the state houses, they're not typically on the cutting edge of what these concerns are.
	And, of course, the concerns about CBDC have been floating around now for several years.
	But I think, you know, we're starting to get more of a response.
	Certainly, many people are going there as activists and trying to awaken these legislators on that.
	I think that's a positive move.
	But I think it reflects the reality of what is involved here.
	People are looking at this.
	They see CBDC, for example, in Nebraska, the term money.
	Includes all kinds of coin, all kinds of paper issued by or under authority of the United States circulating as money.
	Money does not include CBDC. So, you know, they put that in there.
	They gave a hat tip to the Federal Reserve implicitly there.
	But they came after CBDC. You know, CBDC specifically.
	That's got a lot of people's concern.
	And so, you know, interestingly, they did not mention anything about any cryptocurrency in that either.
	So it's...
	It's something people are starting to be very concerned about, even to the extent that you now have at least five, maybe more states that are passing legislation to address what they see as a changing landscape and the threat from CBDC. I got a couple of comments and questions for you here.
	Michelle Obama, thank you for the tip, says, Alpha Wolf, baby!
	I think Michelle Obama man is in on that.
	And Jason Barker has a question for today.
	Again, Jason Barker, Knights of the Storm.
	Question for Tony.
	When will the metals ETFs bubble pop?
	When will somebody find out that the emperor has no clothes and the Shanghai Gold Exchange maybe has no gold?
	Well, that's a great question, Jason.
	And again, shout out to Knights of the Storm and Jason Barr, all he does for FreeWorld.fm.
	Thank you so much for doing that.
	You know, I have, that's my question.
	When does all of this get exposed?
	I think, you know, on the other side of re-valuating commodities, as we look, the petrodollar, it's lapsed.
	It's gone. I mean, and Saudi Arabia doesn't want to trade in dollars.
	They're doing the Chinese yuan and they're using gold.
	There's other things that they're Moving towards, they want to get away from that system.
	When things stop being denominated and dollars are gonna have a real problem, I don't know that it'll happen all in one day, like it'll be a big reveal.
	But I got to see this firsthand, how fake that was.
	At the beginning of 2021, there was a big run on silver.
	You guys can go look up the timeline.
	The same people who did GameStop, and they said, let's just make the physical silver market pop.
	Let's do this, just kind of like the Hunt family did in the 70s.
	And it was a big, I mean, I've never seen so many orders.
	They cleared me out. I had to make future trades just to fill the orders that were happening.
	And again, it had cleared me out of physical silver.
	I knew pretty much every shop that I knew was out of physical silver.
	This is February of 2021.
	And the next day, the price went down.
	So, how can you be out in the real world in the third dimension?
	How can you not have physical silver to give people and be two or three or six weeks out at the trading floor, but somehow the price goes down?
	And they sold off 1.5 times the annual supply.
	And that's, I'm talking about the trading houses.
	1.5 times the annual supply in one day.
	Hmm. To make sure that it looked like there was just a bunch of sell-offs.
	So, you know, David, you and I have talked about...
	And where did it go? It just went into the ether, I guess, or something.
	It goes into the ether, but there's something that they're protecting with all of this.
	I mean, if you really want to get into...
	Stuart Angler, who wrote the book Rigged on this, and he's been digging into the rigged gold market for many, many, many years as an organization to look into it.
	I've had him on my show.
	You just really think about it.
	The powers that be have a vested interest in keeping the price of gold stabilized because we saw what happened in the 1970s.
	It was $35 an ounce.
	By the end of the 70s, it was near $800 an ounce in some places.
	So it's up like 2,000%.
	Well, they have to put a stop to that because you're talking about runaway inflation and the powers that be, it exposes the dollar being worth nothing.
	So there's a constant war going on with the establishment.
	To keep you away from precious metals, they really put a stop to that silver run, just like they did the Hunts at the end of the 1970s.
	Silver in 1980 was $52.50 an ounce.
	That's like $250 or $300 in purchasing power today.
	Who really knows how much purchasing power it is?
	Because I don't think our true reckoning of what damage has been done to the dollar has really showed up yet, even from the last three or four years, because we're looking at 80% of all the dollars ever made were made in the last 60 months.
	So I don't think that's all come to fruition.
	So we really don't know.
	The true timeline, I think, is accelerating because all these things are happening at once.
	I mean, just these big moves.
	It's almost like...
	It's almost like it's a plan, David.
	From around the world, of course, the United States is the head of that.
	It's just going to be given to Ukraine.
	When has that ever happened before?
	Without any sort of repatriated funds.
	It doesn't mean a thing if it doesn't have that T there.
	I mean, unless it's a trillion, there's no point in even talking about it anymore.
	That's what it used to be with Ukraine.
	And Everett Dirksen said, well, you know, a million here and a million there.
	Pretty soon you're talking about real money.
	No, you're not. You're not talking about real money until you get into the trillions now.
	Because now that's become the new currency, I guess.
	And that right there tells you something about corruption as well as inflation.
	I've got another question from Michelle Obama.
	And again, thank you for a tip.
	It says, Tony, how can I protect...
	Against break-ins to protect my gold.
	And Gard wants to know.
	He says he's asking for a friend, Gard Goldsmith, I guess.
	So, yeah. How do we protect it?
	Well, that is the $60,000 question, the $64,000, whatever it is.
	Now, with inflation, I think it's the $180,000 question, whatever it is now, David.
	But, yeah... Protecting your gold, protecting your silver.
	The first thing you need to do, if you're going to guard that yourself, is get something that's fireproof.
	You can get one of those safes.
	You can go to Tractor Supply and get you a decent gun safe for under $700.
	Again, that's not cheap, but you can get something pretty decent that will fire rated for about an hour.
	So you'd want that first.
	If you can hide it, that's also a good thing.
	If you can bolt it down, that's another good thing.
	But again, you can't...
	Even if you have it...
	The wealthy, they never have a bunch of gold or silver at home.
	They mostly are going to be in third-party storage vaults.
	That's what the super wealthy do.
	But if you're just a regular person like me, you want to keep your gold and silver at home or in a safe place that's something you own.
	Well, fireproof safe is the first thing.
	And, you know, the heavier the better.
	Really what you're trying to do with things like that is just slow people down.
	Yeah, that's important.
	Jason Barker says ETFs are violating the law of supply versus demand.
	That's right. They have...
	Tells you who's involved in it, doesn't it?
	There's got to be some government involvement in there at some level if you can just suspend all that stuff.
	It's like the macroeconomics I would study in school.
	It's like, okay, so this is kind of like the physics of Looney Tunes, where the rock is really dangerous and heavy, but if you get a big enough rock, it just floats.
	So you can really worry about keeping things balanced if you're talking about your own home budget or your business or something like that.
	But hey, if it's a government, they don't have to balance anything.
	If it's such a big debt, it just floats.
	It doesn't sink on its own weight.
	Well, that's right. And everything that's tracking back to gold and silver and finite and money and the changes that are going on, The deep state and those who rule over us, they rely on the fake system.
	Everything tracks back to that.
	You can't have any true reforms without having sound money first.
	The founding fathers knew that as well.
	They saw what happened.
	With the continental, you know, worthless is a continental.
	Again, that's fiat currencies all throughout history.
	They all go to zero and they really just prop up the ruling order while they, you know, print out the fake notes.
	So I think this is something that, you know, generationally we're going to have a shift.
	People are starting to look, I mean, again, I see this all the time when I ran for office and I've been on the air for 11 years now.
	People's attitudes have changed over this.
	They actually understand what I'm talking about.
	When I'm talking about the Federal Reserve, going around saying, I want to audit and end the Fed.
	What does that even mean?
	That was 10 years ago.
	Now, I think it's mainstream.
	And people are moving away from believing in the almighty dollar.
	And that's really because the establishment did my job for me by making it so over the top.
	But, you know, my making it so obvious that you can't trust them.
	But again, that's what they need.
	They need something that is unlimited, without value, and it cannot be tracked and cannot be accounted for.
	They need that. And of course, in order to have any semblance of liberty, you need sound money because you have to have accountability.
	So there's two opposing things happening at the same time.
	And it's going to be interesting.
	You know, what is it?
	Gresham's Law, right? Gresham's Law states that when bad money enters the system, good money goes into hiding.
	Well, when bad money finally tanks the system, good money comes back in, right?
	So I think you'll see an inflow of things in parallel systems coming up with people trading amongst themselves, cryptocurrencies.
	He's very important to watch all of that as we watch this not even slow process anymore David of the decline of the dollar Yes, yes one of the listeners here says Precious metals besides they said before that there'll be bullets guns water food shelter gear etc even your your skills You know they'll be barter issues and things like that, but it'll also be something if you have Wealth like that if you have it in different forms It's one of the reasons I like the goldbacks that you have.
	You know, something's going to break it down into a smaller denomination, and gold just seems to have a psychological effect.
	Advantage over silver in most people's minds.
	Not that there's any real advantage, but it just seems to have that, I think.
	And so, you know, when we look at this, and as you're saying, once they press this to, they've done your work for you by making this so ridiculous.
	That's what I was just talking about with Chad Xi PT in China, right?
	He makes it such an absurd propaganda piece.
	Nobody wants to use it.
	And so once they make this, I guess we could have a Fiat GPT. When they have their CBDC, we call it Fiat GPT. We could call it that when they're printing all this money.
	But at a certain point, when they become so over the top, in your face about this kind of stuff, people finally catch on.
	And they move on.
	They move on to something else.
	And so I think we're at that moment now.
	Everything is truly shifting.
	And it's starting to shift more rapidly.
	To see all this plethora of legislation, even at the state level, that tells you that broadly, people are losing faith in this Federal Reserve system.
	So that's why I think that they're not worried about fighting inflation.
	As Gerald Slenty has pointed out many times, if they wanted to fight inflation, they would raise interest rates above the rate of inflation, which they've not come close to doing.
	They don't even give you an accurate number on inflation.
	They don't give you an accurate number on jobs and unemployment or any of this.
	Right.
	Right. They're content to let him twist in the wind by not lowering interest rates, or maybe now people are saying, well, maybe they'll do one interest rate cut before the election, but we'll see what they do afterwards.
	It's still not clear to me who they really want to win.
	They're doing things to help both of them, quite frankly, that none of which makes any sense.
	So who have they picked?
	I just know that it isn't me that has any say over any of this stuff.
	But tell us what's going on at Wise Wolf.
	What do you have happening there?
	Well, you're absolutely right about, and I want to get to that.
	The World Economic Forum, the elite, the establishment, the Federal Reserve, they don't offer any sort of future or great alternative for anybody.
	Nobody believes in that anymore.
	Is anybody getting behind that that wants something better for themselves?
	They've already, and again, I don't think that the Federal Reserve is fighting inflation, David.
	I think what they're actually worried about is hyperinflation.
	They're not, you're not, Gerald Salente is right.
	They're not going to put interest rates higher above the rate of inflation to stop that.
	I think they're just trying to keep the system in place long enough.
	Maybe it's for people to get their golden parachutes or the establishment to make transitions into other things.
	But yeah, they're not really concerned with the economy.
	Anybody who was truly concerned with the economy wouldn't have done What they've done to it.
	And continue to do with all the bans and mandates and everything, you know, even about home appliances.
	It's ridiculous. Absolutely.
	And so I think their actual concern is losing control of the monetary system itself through hyperinflation.
	I think that's really the issue.
	It's that they know that there's going to be inflation.
	They know there's loss of purchasing power.
	It's that how long can they sustain it?
	That's my opinion. But as far as Wise Wolf is concerned, just keeping the supply line open.
	I'm in Texas right now.
	I'll be back up in Missouri here in a couple of days to check on the shop in Branson.
	But it's just about, you know, I'm going to the trading floor a little bit later today and turning in some product for people and picking up some things.
	I'm picking up some of that fractional gold because I need it for Wolfpack.
	It really is going to be more and more...
	I'm up to the challenge.
	It's kind of an adventure to see how I can...
	Especially if you join the Wolfpack.
	I did that because I've been in this business long enough to know that the big companies, folks...
	Nothing wrong with them, but they have a mission in mind, and they really don't care if you have $500.
	They want you to have $50,000.
	Wolfpack is a lot of moving parts for me and my crew and everything to handle for not a lot of money at the, if really in the scheme of things, you know, the gross amount of it during the month is, that's why the bigs don't do this.
	They don't target people at 50, 125, 250, even a thousand.
	That's really not what they do.
	And so we've taken that and turned it on its head, which I'm really proud of.
	Because everybody deserves the ability, if you've done, you know, for your work, to be able to put it into something that houses value.
	And gold and silver do that.
	You know, I read your Bible.
	You know, I read a little bit of the Bible every morning.
	I try to do some Bible study, a couple of pages at least.
	And it mentions gold and silver all over the place.
	I didn't remember that when I was a kid, just looking back through it, especially in Proverbs and the wisdom books.
	It's filled with that.
	So, again, they're going to be part of our, if there is a future, and God willing, there's a future, then gold and silver will be a part of it.
	And fiat currency will too, but I think it's reached a point where it's no longer trusted.
	We've had this experiment since 1971.
	A free-floating currency backed by nothing, and we see how that ends up.
	So, you know, the average lifespan of a fiat currency is 26 years, David.
	So, we're double that, and we're going to see how this all turns out.
	So, I'm excited about helping people get out of the dollar, get into something physical.
	You're always welcome to contact me through davidknight.gold, and I'm happy to support this show and give Give you credit and the crew, the Knight family, which I so appreciate what you do and the message you bring here.
	Three hours a day. Guys, you don't know how hard this is.
	Support David. If you can, you can support him outside of what I do as well.
	I mean, you can go direct and go to thedavidknightshow.com.
	I'm plugging for you, David, because you hardly ever do it.
	I'm the same way. I don't plug for myself.
	Yeah, it does get wearing at times.
	But, yeah, and I appreciate what you do.
	You know, I've been in a situation having a small business, and how do you compete against the big guys that are on Wall Street, right?
	Well, you do it by trying to offer better product, better service, and that type of thing.
	And so that's one of the reasons why you go that extra mile, do that extra work that has a smaller payoff to help people with Wolfpack and things like that.
	And I think that's really important.
	And it says a lot about your business and what your focus is on, the fact that you're trying to help the little guys.
	You're one of us, and you're out there trying to help people to get into this and provide some security and some privacy and some anonymity for them.
	We're at a situation now, we've had situations that many of us have been through with high inflation, and we've seen things get shaky with the dollar, but we've never had a situation where that is there Plus, CBDC. You know, it's like this time that we've got so many different factors that are happening all at once, and it truly is very unpredictable.
	As Gerald Salenti talks about, he says, well, I'll talk about trends.
	I don't make predictions. I don't know when something is going to happen, but I can certainly identify the trend and see where that's going in terms of the exact speed or when it's absolutely going to happen.
	We can't make that prediction, but we see where the trend is headed.
	And so we just want to be on the side of Privacy, liberty, and keeping what you've got as these people trying to steal everything you've got.
	The eats the bugs thing has become, everybody says that now.
	That message has gone out.
	And I think even to that extent, you know, they've got to roll out Klaus Schwab and at least pretend to put somebody else there in charge.
	And so this is, you know, what is happening.
	Things are rapidly changing.
	And you need to find things that have been around.
	We need to go back and re-examine the foundations, as you pointed out, you know, as these ancient books, gold and silver were money then.
	They're still money now. They're going to continue to be money.
	Why? Because money is what you really trust, and nobody trusts the dollar any more than they trust Klaus Schwab.
	That's right. It's all in the same category.
	Well, you've got a program that is coming up after this show ends.
	Tell people about that, where they can find it, where they can find your shows, as well as, of course, David Knight that takes you to Wise Wolf Gold.
	But what about your shows?
	Yes, Arterburn Radio Transmission.
	I reschedule it every Thursday, so I come on your show.
	We talk a little bit about the markets, gold and silver, and geopolitics, and you can follow me 11 a.m.
	Central Time, so here in, what, 50 minutes or so.
	We'll be live on rockfin.com and the America Unplugged channel and on my Twitter at Tony Arterburn.
	And freeworld.fm.
	So be sure and tune in and say hi in the comments.
	Anybody's welcome from this show for sure.
	That's great. Freeworld.fm is where people can find you as well as on Rockfin.
	All right, so again, thank you, Tony.
	Thank you for all your support, and it's always great talking to you and seeing you every week.
	It's the only time we get to talk, really, when you come on here, so I do enjoy the times that you do come on.
	Thank you so much for all of your help.
	We really do appreciate it.
	I appreciate you, and happy Father's Day.
	Well, thank you. Looking forward to it.
	It's coming.
	When is that, by the way?
	Sunday. What's that?
	It's this Sunday. Sunday.
	Okay. Well, okay. I've got to exercise my privilege here and try to get something there.
	That's interesting. I remember one Father's Day that sticks out and will stick out my entire life was how depressed I was in 2020 looking at how foolish the people of this country were to believe the panic and the lies about pandemic stuff. It was so depressing. I'll never forget that. I thought, we're done. Nobody's ever going to wake up to this stuff. But things are starting to turn around. And when you have a situation like that, there's no place to turn to but God.
	And so that was a very memorable time.
	But we're going to talk about the pandemic when we come back because there's still a lot of people out there that you can fool them once, fool them twice, and you can keep fooling them forever.
	And we'll talk about the methods that they're using to fool people and what they're now telling us when we come back.
	Thank you again, Tony. David Knight died gold.
	Take you to Tony Arterman. Don't forget to tune in after this show.
	Thank you, Tony. Appreciate it.
	Thank you, Dave. Okay, folks, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	you Well, as I was just saying, you know, thinking back four years ago to that Father's Day, and it was amazing to me to see how these people were just running on and on.
	You know, it's like that Elvis song.
	You can run on for a long time.
	Sooner or later, God's going to cut you down.
	Well, it looks like God's cutting some of these people down to size right now.
	Because just as we talk about, there's this quiet movement about what the public generally believes.
	At the same time, there is this massive manipulation of media and social media to tell you a different narrative still underneath it.
	There is this movement, and these people understand it because they are watching what people are saying on social media.
	That was what it was designed for, as a surveillance tool, to take the temperature of the public.
	And we know how they take our temperature.
	But it was...
	Unfortunately.
	But... They know what people are thinking, and so they're scrambling to try to distance themselves from some of this stuff.
	So we've had Chris Cuomo who came out and said, oh yeah, you know, and we played the clips where he was mocking people for taking ivermectin.
	We knew at the time, and we talked about it at the time, you know, when he got the vaccine and he's bragging about that, and then he's talking about how he's got this or that, and it's like, that guy didn't have a really bad reaction to the vaccine, but he did have a reaction to the vaccine.
	And he says, well, I don't know if it was a vaccine or if it was COVID, but I had some reactions.
	I had to take some ivermectin.
	At the same time, he was haranguing everybody for taking horse medicine, pushing the lies from this cynical, corrupt bureaucracy we call the FDA, telling people it's horse medicine and all the rest of the stuff.
	Now he's trying to walk it back.
	He doesn't want to walk too quickly.
	He doesn't want to go too far either.
	So he'll give us kind of a limited hangout.
	And we've seen that type of thing as well.
	We see it from the people who were on the other side in terms of the conservative media at Fox who are pushing the vaccine, pushing the narrative.
	People like Megyn Kelly, people like Cuomo.
	Now they have changed their positions and they're trying to ingratiate themselves to an audience more than they are to a pharmaceutical-supported network.
	We see a little bit different narrative from them, but still not the full truth that is out there.
	Now we've got Governor Cuomo, Chris Cuomo's brother.
	Former Governor Andrew Cuomo went before Congress, and he says, well, I'm not responsible for any of this stuff.
	We're now at the I-know-nothing stage, right?
	If only this is the Nuremberg Trials, except, of course, we know that the Nuremberg Trials, there are a lot of people who are Nazi collaborators, and there are a lot of people who actually ran some of these horrific experiments or brought in with Operation Paperclip, or they're brought in with Operation Ticker Tape, as I call it, the bankers, and they were set up in various places.
	You've got Wernher von Braun.
	The rockets go up, the rockets go down.
	That's my concern, says Vernon von Braun.
	So, you know, he'd run the V2 rocket thing.
	Well, we could use that. We could have him do some rockets for us.
	So let's forget about everything that he did.
	And you see this type of thing happening over and over again.
	Now, these people don't really have anything that they can offer to society.
	There isn't anything that any of the Cuomo brothers or Megyn Kelly have that they can offer to society.
	They've got nothing really to put out there.
	So they have to try to pander to the current narrative.
	And these people are now saying, I knew nothing.
	I didn't do it. It was somebody else who was doing it.
	The fingers are pointing in every direction now.
	And that's a good thing.
	Because it isn't that anybody in the media is really telling us the truth.
	The mainstream media or even much of the alternative conservative media is not really coming out with a full truth now.
	A lot of them are still selling this panic of the lab stuff.
	A lot of them are still selling Trump as your savior.
	Ignoring his culpability.
	Ignoring his leadership in this globalist war against us in every country.
	Don't tell me this guy is an anti-globalist when he did everything that they wanted.
	At the exact time that they wanted.
	As long as he was there.
	He was their servant.
	Look at what he did.
	Not what he said.
	Not what he says now.
	He betrayed us.
	Benedict Donald. There is absolutely no doubt about it.
	But let's talk about Cuomo.
	Congress. He goes before Congress.
	And he says, well, I wasn't the one who was responsible for the order.
	It was not me, it was somebody else.
	It wasn't me, it was Fauci.
	It wasn't me, it was the bureaucrats.
	It was this or that, right?
	He said, I didn't do that.
	I didn't do that.
	You know, I'll never forget when I was in high school.
	Somebody, a friend of my parents, who went to a doctor.
	For an operation.
	It was an abdominal operation.
	And the doctor sewed the person up with his, not scissors, but his forceps that you grab stuff with.
	So it didn't have a sharp edge on it, but it was a sharp enough edge.
	And the guy comes back to the doctor for a checkup and he goes, I think you left something inside of me.
	And it's poking out.
	I mean, it's like poking at the skin.
	The doctor looks at it and his eyes got real big and he goes, I didn't do that.
	I didn't do that. He clearly did do it.
	He leaves the room.
	He can't handle it. It's like his whole career flashed before his eyes because he knew he was going to get nailed to the wall by the insurance company and the medical licensing board and everything to leave his forceps in this guy's stomach and sew it up.
	Not working its way out to the front.
	And, you know, the guy that this happened to is a friend of my dad.
	He said, I just wanted him to get it out.
	You know, it's like running out of there.
	And that's what is going on with Andrew Cuomo.
	I didn't do that. No, you were doing the operation.
	You were the head surgeon and all this stuff.
	You have the responsibility for it.
	He tries to pass it to people below him.
	He tries to pass it to people above him.
	And quite frankly, the culpability does and the responsibility does flow uphill.
	The buck stops with the president.
	And the financing of all this, the buck started with the president.
	Cuomo told us that he didn't know that this directive existed.
	I didn't authorize that, he said.
	He said his Department of Health commissioner did not authorize it.
	Somehow it just popped up from an unknown staff member.
	That's a report from a Republican from New York, Republican Congresswoman Nicole Maliotakis, I guess.
	Anyway, I'm not sure about the pronunciation of her last name, but anyway, she told that to reporters in a briefing after this closed-door hearing.
	He said, I didn't sign that order.
	The guy who works for me didn't sign that order.
	I don't know who signed that order.
	It's an unknown staffer.
	So, you know, we've got monuments to the unknown soldier that we honor.
	And I guess maybe what we could do is burn an effigy, the unknown staffers and the unknown bureaucrats who did this because none of our leaders wants to take responsibility.
	Fauci doesn't want to take responsibility.
	Francis Collins doesn't want to take responsibility.
	Trump doesn't even have to push it away.
	He's got people like Alex Jones and Wayne Allen Root who will push it away from him.
	Nobody wants responsibility for any of this stuff.
	So we need to, we could set it up in every locality.
	We could have the unknown medical health dictator, the unknown Gesundheit Fuhrer, as Eric Peters called him.
	And we could set that thing up, and as we pass by it, we could all spit on it or whack it or something like that, you know, take out our ingrant.
	Because, you know, Cuomo and Trump and all the people who are doing this, they don't have any responsibility at all.
	They know nothing about any of this stuff.
	The governor finds out about this directive that kills thousands of seniors a month later, she said.
	She said this is outrageous, this lie that he's telling us.
	He finds out about it, he says, a month later, but he still did not do an internal investigation to find out who this lowly staff member, who is still unknown, who was that person?
	Who was that masked man?
	I don't know, Kim Wasabi.
	She said, that to me is unconscionable.
	Yeah, you know what?
	Republicans are playing that same game with Trump.
	You mean he was president and he was funding this at every level and he doesn't know who did it and he's not responsible for anything that anybody did?
	Even though he brags and says that it was all him?
	Even though he says, I saved millions of lives with my lockdowns, I did more of a lockdown than Fauci wanted and all the rest of the stuff, but Trump's not to blame.
	No, no, Republicans will never hold him to blame.
	It is outrageous that Andrew Cuomo would say this.
	She's absolutely right about it.
	It's also outrageous, I guarantee you, that this Republican congresswoman from New York would never hold Trump responsible for any of these consequences.
	And we've seen this now with Francis Collins and with Fauci before that.
	I don't know where that six-foot rule came from.
	I don't know who thought it was a good idea to do masks.
	I have nothing to say about that.
	What was there, you'd never ask to see any studies to see if there was a reason for the six-foot rule or the mask.
	No, no, I never asked about that.
	It's funny, you know. And the governor sees this.
	You know, all these people are being sent to.
	He doesn't know who did it, doesn't care about it, doesn't investigate it at all.
	And of course, you know, they will investigate to try to make political capital out of it, but they will not investigate or ask any questions of Trump.
	The March 25, 2020 directive from the New York Department of Health stated that nursing home operators couldn't refuse to accept residents even if they tested positive for COVID-19.
	Quote, no resident shall be denied readmission or admission to a nursing home solely based on confirmed or suspected diagnosis of COVID-19, said the order.
	Now again, this is noteworthy because If this were a real pandemic, which it was not, then, you know, that makes absolutely no sense.
	It was really medical martial law.
	It was really an effort in every way that they could to get elderly people sick with a cold or whatever.
	Because, you know, a cold will turn into flu, turn into pneumonia, turn into whatever.
	And, you know, people will die from it.
	They wanted to have dead bodies.
	That were caused by medical malpractice or by non-treatment or by novel new treatments that made absolutely no sense.
	Oh, somebody's got a respiratory disease?
	Put a mask on them, you know?
	Make it harder for them to breathe.
	Somebody's got a heart attack? Put a mask on them.
	Oh, they must have died of COVID. Yeah, yeah, I'm afraid they did.
	I got this. I magnified this by a trillion times.
	I found, says this thing, I found what I was looking for.
	So medical martial law and Cuomo turned the rule of law over to these bureaucrats to dictate to us.
	But now he says he's not responsible.
	Well, he turned it over to them.
	But see, this is the same game that the Congress always plays.
	Well, you know, we didn't do it.
	It was the bureaucracy that did it.
	You fund the bureaucracy.
	You continue to fund the bureaucracy.
	All you'll do is maybe if it gets really bad, you won't even defund the bureaucracy or change anything or pass any conflicting laws.
	You let them pass the rules, and then if things get really bad, you have a trial, and you give them a tongue lashing, but things remain the same.
	We even see that with the president.
	Well, I can't undo the executive order from the preceding president.
	Let me ask the Supreme Court if I can do it.
	The Supreme Court says, no, can't do it.
	Okay, well, I'm off the hook now.
	I really would like to do something about immigration, but...
	Everybody tells me that I can't do anything about it.
	So that's the end of it. So what's the difference with Trump?
	Well, the difference is that Trump, unlike Cuomo, unlike Fauci, unlike Francis Collins, is really not trying to pass the blame off to anybody.
	You know, he's kind of in this neutral position.
	The first thing that we have seen from him to indicate that he understands that he has some culpability in all of this was when he started, he sensed a threat There's disturbance in the force.
	And he was worried about RFK Jr.
	Because RFK Jr.
	has got the goods on him. He says, yeah, he used me.
	Basically, he used RFK Jr.
	to bid his price up to the big pharmaceutical companies.
	Talking about being a vaccine skeptic and everything.
	And then he took the millions of dollars from the vaccine companies and then he put the CEO of Eli Lilly in, Alex Azar, who kicked this thing off and run it through HHS. But here's what Trump was saying about RFK Jr.
	Now, even though Trump has bragged about being the father of the vaccine, it is such a wonderful thing.
	I've saved so many millions of lives.
	You people don't want to talk about it, but hey, it's great.
	It's a wonderful thing.
	And now he comes after RFK Jr.
	And by the way, he said the other night that vaccines are fine.
	He said it on a television show that vaccines are fine.
	He's all for them. And that's what he said.
	And for those of you that want to vote because you think he's an anti-vaxxer, he's not really an anti-vaxxer.
	That's only his political moment.
	He said it the other night.
	He's okay with the vaccine.
	Well, are you? Are you?
	What's your position? You childish, juvenile liar.
	I mean, it's just unbelievable.
	That guy, just, you know, the MAGA myth that has been created around him, the MAGA myth of people like Wayne Allen Root, you know, the chosen one guy, and then Alex Jones, it's a sugar water jab and all the rest of stuff.
	And how many times we've seen Alex, you know, Alex is like the Trump tulip, you know.
	He loves me. He loves me not.
	He loves me. He loves me not.
	These are the guys who are always out there to blame bureaucrats on behalf of Trump, just like Cuomo is trying to do.
	Cuomo said the investigations say New York followed the federal guidance.
	See? Not... It was somebody, some anonymous person, some unknown staffer, not even the people that reported directly to me.
	Some low-level staffer put this rule out there that killed people, put mixed sick people in with elderly people.
	It was some low-level staffer. I don't know who it was.
	I never bothered to look. Or it was somebody up above me.
	It wasn't me. Maybe it's federal guidance.
	He also said New York did well during the pandemic, but that the federal government failed this nation.
	Did New York do well?
	What New York did was they pushed out this pandemic propaganda.
	Even one person wrote a book, Pandemic Nurse.
	I interviewed her. She said, yeah.
	I was in Florida. Nothing was happening.
	But I kept hearing how everything was happening in New York.
	So I volunteered to go up there to help them.
	And she reported in, and they didn't even bother to contact her for a few days.
	And then they brought her in, the guy's showing around.
	Yeah, we're not really all that busy.
	These people over here that we got on ventilators, about 90% of them are going to die, you know, that type of thing.
	It kills people, but, you know, we keep doing it.
	And, you know, so she blew the whistle on it.
	But New York was positioning itself as being the worst place on Earth throughout all this stuff.
	Now he changes that tune as well.
	Cuomo acknowledged in the deposition that the language in the New York mandate was not the same as the CMS guidance.
	And so this is what Elise Stefanik is saying.
	Big Trump cheerleader, okay?
	Who has no problem at all with what Trump did.
	The problem is only with what Democrats did.
	We're never going to talk about any Republicans doing anything wrong here.
	It would be nice if I could play that game.
	I can't play that game.
	I don't know how people in good conscience, you know, people like Elise Stefanik, We'll tell you the truth about the Democrats, but she will lie up one side and down the other about what her idol, Trump, did.
	How do you sleep at night?
	You'll stand before God one day, and you'll answer for these lies.
	It's just amazing to me.
	I can't understand that kind of faithless Machiavellianism that people have.
	It's amazing. Anyway, yeah, talk about CMS guidance.
	You know, the CMS guidance of ventilators to kill people, remdesivir to kill people under Trump, and then that kind of bribery, I'll pay you.
	You know, massive amounts of money.
	20% bonus.
	Just identify the point of these people.
	I'll give you $13,000, another...
	$39,000. A point to them, say they're COVID, $13,000.
	You put them on a ventilator, $39,000.
	The ventilators only cost $50,000.
	And then I'll give you a 20% bonus on everything that you do to this person.
	That's why when somebody's coming in with a heart attack, as Andy pointed out, they'll first give them a COVID test before they do anything to help the person who's having a heart attack because it's about money.
	And that was the bribery that was going on with Trump.
	Then when Biden comes in, it's like, I'm going to take all of that gravy train away from you, and I'm going to take away your ability to charge Medicare and Medicaid as well.
	If you don't inject your nurses and doctors and staff, you'll be out of business.
	Because you become totally dependent on Medicare and Medicaid, CMS, for this stuff.
	That's how they ran it. Claudia Tenney, a Republican out of New York.
	So she's spoken with operators who told her there was no way that this was just something that happened.
	She said they were threatened. You know, he's trying to blame it on the bureaucracy.
	He's trying to blame it on the nursing homes.
	He's trying to blame it on the people above him.
	He's a rat. He's caught in a trap.
	And, you know, the good news is that everybody knows what has happened.
	The question is, you know, what is going to happen to any of these people?
	Is anybody, you know, going to go to jail?
	Nah, I don't think so.
	They were threatened, says Claudia Tenney, the people in the nursing homes, the operators, told her there was no way that we had to get out of this.
	We were threatened. They were intimidated into if they didn't take these nursing home patients, they were going to be shut down.
	Same way that, you know, Trump's Bribery then followed by the other stuff.
	You know, Trump, though, keeps telling us, even though people are getting very angry, even though people are starting to turn away from this, the only thing that we've seen from Trump is him coming after RFK Jr., But, you know, for the most part, he's still saying stuff like this.
	The problem is, you know, we save tens of millions of lives all over the world, but I can't talk about it because our base, our beautiful base of which some of you are there, you get angry when we mention the word vaccine.
	Don't get angry. Yeah.
	Well, there's a great rhetorical question on Daily Skeptic.
	It says, so if the COVID vaccines saved 20 million lives, Trump...
	Chump. Why did so few unvaccinated people die in the winter of 2021?
	Why is that?
	Right? The deaths actually went down according to statistics kept in the UK. The unvaccinated people, their deaths actually declined.
	Because, I guess maybe at that point in time, they started to realize what the hospitals were doing to people.
	Because this was these excess deaths and everything were the hospital protocols that Trump was bribing people to do.
	Suddenly it's okay to question the vaccine narrative, says a couple of people, Carl Hennigan and Tom Jefferson.
	Trust the evidence, they said.
	Suddenly it's okay to question the vaccine narrative.
	But the Lancet, that's like the Journal of the American Medical Association, but in the UK equivalent.
	The Lancet estimated that vaccinations prevented.
	19.8 million excess deaths.
	Mathematical modeling should not be used to justify the policy.
	The latest report shows the numbers do not add up.
	They're still trying to say that they saved 20 million lives.
	Of course, it isn't only the Lancet that has relied on nonsensical mathematical modeling to justify widespread adoption of mRNA technology.
	As a matter of fact, Trump and Fauci and Birx relied on nonsensical mathematical modeling to justify locking people down on Friday the 13th.
	The farcical claim that the AstraZeneca vaccine saved 6 million lives.
	They keep repeating that as well.
	Claims that 500,000 lives were saved by lockdown, that 20 million lives were saved by mRNA vaccines, or that 6 million were saved by AstraZeneca, this all relies on modeling.
	However, we have real-world data, and it paints a very different picture.
	During the part of the winter of 2021 to 2022, the UK experienced its last period where COVID accounted for more than 10% of all-cause deaths.
	And again, they're not even looking at this scam that was there from the very beginning.
	Did somebody die from COVID or did they die with it?
	Oh, they are older than the average life expectancy and they have two to three comorbidities.
	Two or three other things that by themselves could kill them.
	But we gave them this garbage PCR process and identified that we think they got COVID. So no matter what they die from, We're going to attribute it to that.
	And it got to a ridiculously absurd level.
	We had, in Houston, we had a coroner who put down that somebody who ran into a wall with a motorcycle or died on a motorcycle had died from COVID. That's how absurd this whole narrative.
	So, understand that these all-cause deaths don't really mean anything.
	The rollout of the vaccines have been completed by the prior autumn, by which point most elderly and vulnerable people had been vaccinated at least three, and in many cases, four times.
	Right there, that's why the vaccinated are dying at a higher rate than the unvaccinated.
	If COVID vaccines really prevented 20 million deaths, or if Trump is right about any of this stuff, and the AstraZeneca vaccine really saved 6 million lives, then you would assume that during the 2021 to 2022 mini-COVID spike, Deaths of the never vaccinated would have increased faster than the deaths of the vaccinated.
	The exactly opposite happened.
	While COVID deaths spiked in January 2022, all-cause deaths from the never vaccinated, rather than increasing, decreased.
	In fact, the reduction of the all-cause deaths from the never vaccinated was somewhat more pronounced than that of the vaccinated.
	And so... Did Trump's vaccines work?
	Did they save 20 million lives in just the UK alone?
	Of course not. What an amazing lie.
	And yet we see that the Trump media, just like Cuomo, will blame everybody but Trump.
	Everybody but the proud father of the vaccine.
	The proud father of the vaccine who has congratulated himself on every opportunity and whenever anybody challenges him about the vaccine, he refuses in spite of the people who are trying to cover for him.
	Beg him. Beg him to please come clean.
	Please apologize. Please tell people that there was a mistake and you're never going to do that again.
	But he won't. And so how do these people like Wayne Allen Root and Alex Jones, how do they handle this?
	Well, Alex got some attention yesterday in the media for saying that he would like to execute some of these people.
	But in typical Alex Jones fashion, he does it, he plays both sides when he's doing his performances.
	Well, you know, I think we need to have some due process here and all this.
	And they need to be put in jail. But, you know, somebody who determines that they should be executed, of course, that is a reasonable thing to do to these people.
	Then I will pull the lever.
	Criminal gang leaders, the big heads of the central banks, Pfizer head, Fauci, all of them that lied to Trump, we know, created the disinfo, already had the vaccine ready.
	Still covering for Trump, aren't you, Alex?
	Pathetic whore. Pathetic whore.
	Yeah. He's got to get ahead of Steve Bannon here.
	He's gotta be tougher than Steve.
	You just put them in prison in solitary confinement.
	They can have to be out one hour a day, but you lock them up for the rest of their lives.
	Now, that said, it is constitutional.
	If it can be shown that they knowingly, like Bayer Pharmaceutical did, put HIV and hepatitis and killed over a million hemophiliacs in the U.S. and Europe and Australia and other areas, it is the right thing to do that they be executed.
	But I'm saying that's up to juries.
	Treason, all the stuff they've done, I'm just calling for life imprisonment.
	And if the juries decide to hang them, I'm not a wimp.
	I will volunteer. I think it should be public.
	I will pull the lever. I will say that.
	I don't have a bloodlust, but I don't want people to do work I wouldn't do.
	If they're convicted by a jury of treason, I would, personally, on national TV, be there and pull the switch to break their necks at the end of a row.
	Well, you know what's going on here.
	Steve Bannon is out there saying, we've got to take revenge.
	We've got to put these people behind bars.
	We've got to do this and do that.
	And it's like, well, Alex can't let somebody else out there.
	B.S. him, okay?
	He's got to be just as, he's got to be the most blustery Winnie the Pooh out there.
	And of course, what he always does is, you know, I was really talking about putting people in jail.
	I was saying we've got to go through due process if anybody wants to call him.
	But then he wants to say, yeah, I want to kill him.
	I'll kill him. Give me a chance.
	I'll kill him. That type of stuff.
	Just absolutely ridiculous.
	You know, Alex, you already pulled the lever.
	On your own listeners.
	You pull the lever on them when you told them, hey, we can do something about the Trump thing.
	By no means are we ever going to allow Biden to take that White House.
	Show up in Washington on January the 6th with me.
	We're going to stop this whole thing.
	You gave them false hope.
	You put the rope around their necks.
	And you put the rope around the conservative movement's neck.
	The whole thing was a bluff, a trap, a grift.
	But the worst thing you did was to push the pandemic panic at the beginning, to make lots of money, and then to tell people this.
	Very weak, attenuated, classic viruses with a very low amount of adjuvant in it.
	Trump's looking at basically sugar water for folks.
	Can we take a little bit of an attenuated, microwaved or radiated COVID deal?
	Absolutely. That's why Trump is taking control of the process.
	Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump.
	He knows where he gets his money.
	It's absolutely amazing.
	And so, you know, you got these people now who are still pushing gain-of-function panic.
	They're pushing that for the bird flu now.
	And they're pushing, like Steve Bannon is pushing, they're pushing the buttons for civil war as well.
	Just like 2020.
	It just keeps rhyming, doesn't it?
	They gotta keep this narrative alive.
	The narrative of terror.
	The fear-mongering about a pandemic.
	And of course, Daily Skeptic says, yeah, keeping the terror narrative alive.
	Over a year ago, we reported all the ducks, not a pun, were being lined up for the next round of fear-mongering.
	Fear-mongering by the alt-right media, by the mainstream press and these other people, as I said before, Zero Hedge, just in the last week, ran three stories, two of them from the Epoch Times, one of them from Michael Snyder.
	Michael Snyder saying, look, we got a guy who dropped dead from bird flu.
	No, you're lying about that, Michael.
	That's an absolute lie.
	Or the Epoch Times saying, yeah, this stuff is being engineered and has gained a function.
	All the stuff that we were lied to about in 2020, we were told people were dropping dead in the streets in China, weren't we?
	As fake as you can imagine.
	And we were told, yeah, it came out of the lab.
	And now everybody's saying, oh, yeah, it's out of the lab.
	So you better be afraid.
	They're going to lock us down. It's going to be justified now when they kill all the cows and the chickens and things like that to turn over all the agricultural business to big business.
	Same pattern, isn't it?
	You know, they shut down mom and pop businesses on Main Street to help the Wall Street people.
	That's what they're doing with agriculture.
	And then they know that we're not going to take this vaccine directly, so they want to put it in our food.
	And then, of course, make the food so expensive that they impoverish us.
	This is why it's important.
	I don't like attacking Zero Hedge or Alex or any of these people because it actually hurts the program.
	But I have to talk about this.
	We can't allow these people who lied us into this situation to do this again.
	How many times are we going to fall for this?
	We got two people running for president, and everybody thinks that their life depends on whether Trump is in or Trump is out.
	Who should replace Klaus Schwab in the World Economic Forum?
	Please tell me. Who are you voting for?
	Oh, you don't get a vote?
	Well, guess what? You don't get a vote about the presidency either.
	That's a charade.
	The elections are a charade.
	They're rigged. When are you going to figure that out?
	When are you going to do something locally?
	When are you going to do something for yourself, for your family, for your community?
	When are you going to do something at the state level?
	Everything is completely upside down.
	They've got everybody 100% focused on the one race that they can have no impact upon at all.
	Even Elon Musk knows that.
	Even George Soros knows that.
	Listen to Elon Musk.
	He says, yeah, George Soros knows that he can't impact the presidential race.
	You think you're going to impact it with your vote?
	With your $10 or whatever, you think you're going to do something about that?
	My son says, don't forget to plug.
	The gas gauge is low. Yeah, it definitely is.
	It's drying up because people don't like to hear that they put all of their hope in Trump.
	He is the chosen one.
	He will save us. And if I take that hope away from people...
	They don't want to put their hope in themselves or their family or their community or their state.
	Certainly don't want to put their hope in God.
	Oh, they don't like hearing that message.
	I got people writing me all the time about that stuff.
	I know exactly what's going on.
	And I said it's going to get a lot worse between now and the election.
	It's going to continue to get worse.
	Once people make, a lot of people sitting back, once these conventions start, once we get really close to the election, once they start running these things, oh, watch this.
	I mean, my audience is going to go...
	Because people don't want to hear that Trump is a lying piece of excrement who sold us out.
	And the people who are cheering him, Alex will blame everybody that he can think of, but not Trump.
	Trump was lied to.
	Okay, so he's a chump.
	I should vote for the chump.
	The chump is going to be the chosen one to save us.
	The guy who didn't know what was going on, who didn't know what was happening for another three years afterwards, he only stopped talking about and taking credit for it when he started to run again.
	I mean, that guy?
	That guy is going to save us?
	Come on. So, you know, we're seeing this type of stuff escalating.
	The lies about this 59-year-old who died in Mexico and everything, and immediately, Zero Hedge, Epoch Times, Michael Snyder, they're all jumping on this to get eyeballs.
	The only positive news is that people on these comments and everything are not buying it.
	I should set it up where I can log in and tell people, go watch my program.
	They already know, and if they're upset that these other people are doing it, maybe that is a situation.
	Anyway, do the vaxxers want to accept their personal responsibility for throwing the rest of us under the bus?
	No, no. Nobody, high or low, will accept responsibility.
	Jason Barker, a couple of comments from Jason, Knights of the Storm.
	He says, Trump had built in a vax mandate for the military.
	You're absolutely right. It just went into effect under Biden because he lost the election.
	That's right. They were going to, both of them were going to, and it was, and thanks to Jason for first talking about that.
	Both of them had said as soon as it was approved that they were going to mandate that.
	And I said in December of 2020, I said, you know when they're going to approve this?
	They're going to approve it just before school starts so they can pressure people.
	That's when they did it in September.
	Jason Barker says, yes, David, the overall deaths went down according to CDC as COVID deaths supposedly became the number one cause.
	The excess deaths went up after the vax and the CDC stopped reporting.
	This is part of the reason I was banned.
	I was tracking the numbers very carefully and reporting factual numbers.
	Yeah. Yeah, you can't even report their stuff.
	Without getting vaxxed.
	A Syrian girl says, so did Alex take the sugar water for Trump or just tell his listeners to do it?
	Yeah, that's right.
	He didn't, I think.
	Just like Tucker Carlson, right?
	Yeah, let's bring on the doctor who is going to push this with Trump and all the rest of this stuff.
	My son writes, Whistler says, true.
	Where is the video of him getting his sugar water injection since he believes in it?
	Yeah. And all of his life, You know, previous 20 years, he'd been on the air.
	He told everybody about the evils of all these things that he said were going to be in there, the adjuvants, you know, the aluminum, the mercury.
	It's going to have some aluminum mercury in there.
	Don't worry about it. Well, that was the big issue with all the other vaccines.
	Well, he used to say, I'm not anti-vax.
	I just, I want to clean vax.
	You know, I mean, you want to get something that doesn't have this aluminum and mercury and preservatives and adjuvants and all this other kind of stuff.
	And then he says, well, you can take that.
	You know, it's just sugar water plus the adjuvants.
	You know, I wouldn't take sugar water with adjuvants in it.
	I would not recommend anybody do that.
	The adjuvants in and of themselves give you Guillain-Barre syndrome, give you autism, give you a long list of things which Alex used to tell people the truth about.
	Until it was to his political advantage to become a Trump cheerleader.
	You know, Alex had always been a non-partisan reporter.
	He'd equally criticized Democrats and Republicans.
	Until Trump came along.
	And then he just became this partisan whore.
	It's just amazing to watch the transformation.
	So as the pandemic moves along, Louisiana, in the midst of all this, has gone counter to the narrative.
	They have legalized raw milk.
	See, I keep saying the solution is at the state levels.
	If you're going to get anything done, you can get it done at the state level.
	This is a short three-page bill that amends and reenacts a series of existing statutes relative to the sale of raw milk.
	During the state Senate vote, a number of legislators could be heard mooing in celebration.
	It is music to my ears.
	The bill, however, still mandates that raw milk providers present a clear warning label that says that the dairy product is not meant for human consumption.
	It must be for horses, right?
	They have a label that expressly says, in uppercase, all uppercase, warning, not for human consumption.
	This product has not been pasteurized and may contain harmful bacteria.
	This statement shall be displayed in a conspicuous manner and shall not be smaller than the height of the minimum form required by the Federal Fair Packaging and Labeling Act for the net quantity statement.
	The bill states and legislates that products and pet food with raw milk in it must clearly state raw milk in the ingredients list.
	The stringent testing is also required on a monthly basis to mitigate the risk of salmonella outbreak, and consumers may request to see the most up-to-date lab results.
	This is on Wine Press.
	And they comment and say, Louisiana is one of the few states that outright banned the sale of raw dairy, though most other states have a litany of restrictions levied against it.
	Usually mandate that all dairy products sold commercially must be pasteurized, save only for a handful of states that do allow raw milk sales at grocery stores.
	And of course, people, the raw milk places in Texas and in Tennessee here, but it has to be done under the guise of, well, we own the cows.
	You know, you buy a membership in it.
	It has to be done under that kind of aegis.
	They don't allow you to sell it in the stores.
	But this is the first.
	They had outright prohibition in Louisiana.
	And considering the fact that this has become the number one thing that the CDC is pushing against, I think that's a very positive sign.
	Along with the fact that the legislators were moving as they did.
	Grant7777. Thank you very much.
	I appreciate the tip.
	Thank you very much. I appreciate that.
	The bill's inevitable passage was derided by mainstream media, pointing toward the recent bird flu fear that they have generated.
	Exactly right. And Winepress comments and says, though raw milk is now allowed to be purchased, and that's welcome news, the bill added a lot of contingencies that are very ridiculous, to say the least, especially a provision that allows the states to immediately stop the sale of raw milk based purely on claims and lies that there is an outbreak.
	Again, no test required, not even a PCR process required.
	They can just, you know, shut it down.
	And we have various states.
	Oh, Radice Bro, thank you.
	That is very kind.
	And Flower Sower, thank you as well.
	Radice Bro says, Alex is not an actor, just a performance artist.
	Here's four hours for gas.
	Well, thank you very much.
	And Flower Sower says, I'm not here to have my ears tickled.
	Thanks, David, for keeping it real and honest.
	Well, thank you very much. I appreciate that support.
	Bird flu. This article is showing, and again, this is Zero Hedge.
	Ten states have confirmed bird flu infections in dairy cattle.
	According to the Department of Agriculture, and Zero Hedge is, you know, putting this out there without any commentary, with any qualifications.
	And let me just ask you this. I said, farmers are increasingly culling cows.
	Why does this make any sense to anybody?
	I mean, just take a look at the birds.
	Over 4 million birds killed in this one large farm.
	And of course, these big agricultural conglomerations can't afford to kill 4 million birds and still stay in business.
	A small farmer can be put out of business by this type of approach.
	If this is something dangerous, why not quarantine the birds and watch them to see if any of them die?
	Well, you and I both know why they don't do that.
	If they were to quarantine them and watch them, And see that they don't die, then the gig would be up, wouldn't it?
	When they kill these birds, they're putting them, you know, shooting them up a conveyor belt into an open truck and driving them to another place and everything.
	If the birds were sick and shedding pathogens and everything, that'd be the worst possible thing you could do.
	If it was a real thing, you would want to contain them and watch them.
	The whole process of killing birds and now focusing on cows more than chickens.
	We know exactly what they want.
	They've been talking about how they want to ban meat and dairy.
	Reuters spoke with USDA spokesperson.
	And so, because USDA said it, it's true.
	Because Reuters says it, it's true.
	And it'll be duly reported by Zero Hedge as if it were true.
	They warned of bird flu-related deaths among cow herds.
	Never seen this unsubstantiated claim before.
	In South Dakota, 1,700 cow dairy sent a dozen of its animals to slaughter after they did not recover from the virus.
	What does that mean? Of course, they're not going to recover from the virus if you kill them after you've got a test.
	At a farm in Michigan, they killed 10% of its 200 infected cows after they failed to recover.
	They did not die.
	You killed them.
	What does this mean? Failed to recover.
	And another one. Ohio Department of Agriculture spokesperson said...
	We had some infective cows that have died, mostly due to secondary infections.
	Oh, are we playing this comorbidity game along with the PCR process again?
	They died from secondary infections, said Texas.
	They couldn't provide us with figures for mortality.
	New Mexico, farmers are increasingly culling cows due to decreased milk production, and on and on.
	We know exactly what this bluff is about.
	And we really have to not, don't accept one iota of this bird of function, bird of function, bird flu and gain of function stuff.
	It's total nonsense and fear-mongering.
	Thank you for joining us. Have a good day.
	The Common Man.
	Bye!
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.

▲