Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 12, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:21

The David Knight Show - 06/12/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	You
	Using free speech to free minds.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Wednesday the twelfth of June.
	Year of our Lord, 2024.
	Well, today we're going to begin with politics.
	Not that I really care about Hunter Biden's convictions.
	And, of course, Biden has escaped the really big charges just as Trump has.
	And yet what we see is this childish narcissism of these politicians.
	I've never seen it worse in my life.
	And, of course, neither have you.
	Especially if you've been paying attention.
	I've never seen people more obsessed with themselves than with the concerns of being a president, the concerns of America.
	These people are willing to push us into a civil war, and we're going to begin with that.
	The dangers of a civil war.
	Even a study in Canada about this.
	Being concerned about it. And yet, perhaps it won't be a civil war.
	Perhaps it'll be the drug war.
	Turning into a military war.
	As the cartels continue to come into our country.
	And you look at the mass murder that is happening in Mexico.
	We'll be right back. Well, everywhere you look, you'll see the story about Hunter Biden, and you'll see the conservatives crowing as like, okay, good, they've got felonies there too, as well, right?
	Well, not the serious ones, really, because, of course, the standard reply is, but Hunter's not running for president.
	Well, Biden Incorporated is, and Biden Incorporated has been shown to be an operation to grift tens of millions of dollars.
	Look, the fact that they didn't report this at all, $10 million, what would happen to you and I if we did that type of thing?
	So, that's not being looked at.
	Just the income tax aspect of it, but certainly the briberies from foreign nations.
	And yet, do we really care about bribery from foreign nations when you look at what's going on with Israel?
	As Thomas Massey said, every congressman's got, you know, minders following them around, and they openly brag about the fact that they're seeking money from a foreign government.
	How does that allow?
	How do we have hate crimes, which are anathema to the First Amendment, to our free speech, our free exercise of religion?
	You can't have free speech.
	You can't have free exercise of religion if you have hate crimes.
	And yet, we have one legislator after the other going to Israel and pushing hate crime legislation.
	Making it an equivalence, even.
	It's not even a racism to criticize a foreign political entity.
	And yet they make those an equivalence.
	And then, to make that a crime to shut down speech.
	And so Biden is able to skip these charges of accepting money from a foreign government.
	Why? Well, I guess because everybody's doing it, right?
	It just depends on which foreign government you're going to be bribed by to operate against the interests of the United States.
	But, you know, it's not even that Ukraine was trying to manipulate us into operating against our own interests.
	These people set up Ukraine as a money laundering issue.
	Send them massive amounts of money.
	And as everybody knows, it's the most corrupt government on earth.
	Bill Gates said so.
	Well, you know, he ought to know because he's right at the center of all of that.
	You know, he knows where he can get the most bang for his buck.
	And of course, Washington is...
	I don't know that Washington is less corrupt than Ukraine.
	I think it probably is in terms of...
	Just a percentage, certainly in terms of magnitude of corruption.
	Nothing equals the United States government on that.
	So, these people can operate with Ukraine.
	They can use it as a money laundering operation.
	They send billions to Ukraine.
	They get back hundreds of thousands or tens of millions.
	And there's no charges associated with that.
	The real serious crimes of the Biden family, just like the real and serious crimes of the Trump family, will not be charged.
	When you look at what happened in 2020, the medical martial law, the massive corruption of sending tens of billions of dollars to pharmaceutical companies and all the rest of this stuff, The lies that were done, the worldwide vaccine, but of course, we were all told, so much so that society, everywhere around the world, people I talk to in other countries, yeah, but Trump is anti-globalism.
	Well, look at what he did.
	He's not. He did exactly what the globalists want.
	Everything they want.
	He's not anti-globalist if you judge him on his actions.
	And not on his absurd rhetoric.
	Even the extent of NATO, what he was doing was he was laying foundation for this war, NATO and the European countries giving more money to Ukraine.
	And of course, money to Ukraine to buy American weapons.
	In many cases, they're even giving American weapons from these other European countries to Ukraine, which will then be replaced with more American weapons bought from the American military-industrial complex.
	So when you look at this, it really is a non-story.
	story.
	Yeah, it's the first time that we've had a child of a president indicted for a crime like this.
	Especially while sitting.
	While sitting president.
	But these types of...
	If we really were...
	The kind of precedents that have been set by these presidents are truly amazing.
	And nobody looks at those precedents.
	Nobody looks at the precedent of 2020.
	And what was done with the lockdowns and the rest of this plandemic.
	Nobody looks at the precedent of vote by mail.
	And instead of promising to change any of these precedents, they declare that they're going to use them for their own good, you see.
	That's the true level of corruption.
	Oh yeah, we're not going to get rid of vote by mail.
	We're going to own that.
	We're going to own it. We're going to out-scam the Democrats on the vote-by-mail stuff.
	We're not going to call for reform of lawfare.
	We're going to use lawfare for our revenge, you see.
	This is where we are.
	This is the level, and that's what you need to take away from this soap opera.
	Look, the crimes that Hunter did with the gun charges and the rest of the stuff, that's real.
	The stuff against Trump is not real.
	But we have people who have been brought up for charges that are not real all the time.
	And Trump did that against people like Julian Assange.
	He countenanced that and refused to pardon people who had been convicted of that.
	People, not just Julian Assange, but people like Ross Ulbrich.
	People like Marty Gottesfeldt.
	So many people that were political prisoners, when you look at all this stuff.
	And of course, what do you do? He pardoned those people who had given him money, people who were connected to his corrupt son-in-law.
	So, a lot of people are asking, well, why isn't Hunter Biden being prosecuted for sex trafficking with minors?
	Why isn't he being prosecuted for influence peddling in foreign countries, for not reporting that income?
	We know why he wouldn't report that income, because the income was from a criminal operation.
	If convicted on three counts, he could face up to 25 years in prison and a fine up to $750,000.
	And I predict that he will get a tiny percentage of that fine and no jail time.
	The first time in U.S. history that the child of a sitting president has gone on trial, the indictment was brought by Special Counsel David Weiss, appointed last year to oversee various Hunter Biden probes.
	And this always happens.
	I mean, when you look at Ken Starr, remember, oh, Ken Starr, oh, he's a...
	He's a diehard Christian.
	He's really going to nail Clinton to the wall.
	He didn't do anything.
	He gave Clinton a pass on every serious, incredible allegation of crimes.
	Serious and credible allegations of all kinds of sexual violence and rape.
	Credible and serious allegations of all kinds of financial corruption.
	And instead, what he did was he got him over committing perjury because he didn't want to admit to a consensual affair.
	That was it. And of course, we've got Ken Starr's number.
	He's passed on now, but Ken Starr helped Jeffrey Epstein.
	He was one of his lawyers, as was Alan Dershowitz.
	And they did a deal with that other Alex, not Alex Azar, but Alex, was it Acosta?
	Anyway, the guy who was a prosecutor, who did the deal with Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr over Jeffrey Epstein, was then brought in by Trump to be the head of the Department of Labor.
	You see, it's a club. You ain't in it, but it's a club.
	It's a uni-party club.
	Trump, Epstein, Clinton, Ken Starr, Dershowitz, all of these people are in on it.
	I've never been more disgusted in politics in my life.
	I mean, I've covered it all my life and it just keeps getting...
	Filthier and dirtier and more disgusting.
	I don't understand people cheering these politicians.
	We need to be looking at how we can build fences against these people.
	To keep them out of our local communities.
	That's what we need to be looking at.
	Instead of jumping on the bandwagon for one or the other.
	Or jumping on the bandwagon because you love Trump.
	Or jumping on the bandwagon because you hate Trump.
	It's all about Trump. Let's do something for ourselves.
	Of course, if I want to do something for myself, I jump on the Trump bandwagon.
	That's a very lucrative bandwagon to be on.
	So, then they attack Joe.
	Joe was, as usual, Joe Biden was speechless.
	She knows so long as she was denied our freedom can never be secured.
	Yeah, what is that about?
	The headline said, She No Long, She Knew Salumina Shuma Hina Yunahina.
	I'll just say that again.
	She knew so long as she was denied.
	Our freedom can never be secured.
	Yeah, okay. Well, that was at a Juneteenth celebration.
	They even got the wrong date.
	Oh man, it's not the 19th of June yet.
	It's a week away.
	But they're still doing a Juneteenth celebration.
	And so it had something to do with freedom, I think.
	Not exactly sure.
	And I'm not sure that he really is sure of what he's saying.
	And then they even make fun of him for his stiff dancing.
	Now this, I think, is not a fair criticism.
	Well, everybody else is kind of jumping around.
	Of course, Lala Harris' husband's looking kind of awkward, and Joe is just standing there frozen stiff.
	But anybody who sees the videos of our wedding knows that I was just like Joe Biden at our wedding.
	I was a stiff.
	I don't know that not being able to dance and clap is a disqualification for president.
	But he is Steph, isn't he?
	I don't know. You look at that and you say, well, in that kind of a situation, what would Jefferson do?
	Would it be a qualification for Thomas Jefferson to be able to dance?
	Yeah, we would never have another Jefferson.
	Not in this country.
	We don't care.
	We don't care about issues, right?
	We want somebody who's a great spokesperson, who can do great speeches and everything.
	And of course, everybody agreed that even though Jefferson could write the Declaration of Independence, he wasn't worth a dime when it came to giving a speech.
	It was just awful.
	He was not an orator.
	He could have never given that speech that...
	Ronald Reagan rehearsed and gave at the 40th anniversary of D-Day.
	Jefferson wasn't an actor.
	He was the real thing. But here's what really concerns me.
	And of course, Ty Cobb, the former lawyer of Trump, who said that he's incapable of acting except in his own perceived self-interest or out of revenge, He says people should be concerned about Trump's retribution fears.
	And Trump keeps stoking this.
	This isn't the left that is out there.
	He keeps tweaking everybody with it.
	Because, interestingly enough, it motivates his base.
	But I think he really does want revenge.
	And so you've got a lot of people looking at this.
	And as I look at the election, the election is being set up.
	They keep... Exacerbating the hatred of Trump and the love of Trump.
	They keep portraying him as a martyr, as a victim, or as some evil Nazi or whatever.
	None of those things are true.
	He's just a narcissistic billionaire who thinks the world revolves around him.
	And in the political world, he's exactly right about that.
	Instead of pushing out revenge, as I said before, we ought to push out reform.
	But these people, when you talk about Trump, the supporters of Trump, the detractors of Trump, they don't talk about reform because reform requires a vision of what you want for society.
	All these people want is to win.
	They don't have a vision of what they want for society.
	And so we have the endless petty narcissism of all of these people putting themselves above the national interest.
	You see, in the past, they would at least pretend publicly to be operating in the national interest, even though they would do things behind the scenes that would be in their own interest, obviously.
	Even though they would have multiple affairs or would try to maintain the illusion that they were faithful in their marriage so that you would trust that they had the character to be faithful to their oath to the Constitution.
	If they're not faithful to their oath to the Constitution, if they boast about how they have gotten rid of these older models and thrown the first wife under the bus, That type of thing.
	Is it any surprise that this same type of person would throw the Constitution and the American public and Main Street under the bus calling us non-essential and then boast about it just as he did when he violated his marriage oaths?
	Character matters.
	And he's the wrong kind of character.
	He's a TV character.
	He's a fictional character.
	He has no integrity.
	He is someone who is focused totally on his own interest.
	Ty Cobb says, there should be concern for what Trump could do to his political opponents.
	He said, from a 30,000 foot view, what I see is Trump angrier now than he was before because he is convicted now.
	And he keeps going on programs with Sean Hannity.
	Sean Hannity says, well, you don't really mean it.
	Oh, yeah, I do really mean I'm going to get even with everybody.
	That is where we are headed with these people.
	And that is why we're going to take a quick break, and we're going to come back and take a look at some of your emails, as well as some of the news out of Canada.
	They had a Canadian organization saying, you know, what are the chances of a civil war in America?
	And if there is a civil war in America, what type of form will it take?
	Will it be violent? Will there be widespread violence?
	We're going to take a look at that when we come back.
	So stay with us.
	So we're going to start with the first one.
	So, let's go.
	So, this is the first one.
	So, this is the second one.
	It's common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	What excuse will Trump tards give him this time?
	I don't know. I don't pay any attention to what Trump says about any of this stuff.
	You know, when he talks of many of the things that he promises to do on day one are things that he didn't do for four years when he was president that were problems then, that were grievous problems then.
	Now, I don't believe anything he says.
	He was going to lock up Hillary. Remember all that stuff?
	Lock her up, lock her up. Hillary for prison t-shirts and stuff like that.
	He didn't do any of that. And I don't believe we can take him at his word for anything.
	But my son had a great comment.
	He said, so is Trump going to pardon this criminal hunter?
	But not anybody who got suckered into January the 6th?
	Yeah, we'll see. You know, Trump, again, oh, I'm going to pardon these people when I become president again.
	Well, a simple fact of the matter is, I pointed out the other day, he didn't have to wait for them to be charged, even, let alone found guilty.
	And, of course, many of them were put into jail and not found guilty.
	They spent a couple of years in jail before they were found guilty, then sentenced to decades in jail.
	Joe Biggs, 17 years.
	And they were not happy about that.
	The Department of Justice wants more than 30 years on him.
	And he was the one pushing the Hillary for prison t-shirts and everything.
	You know, we wind up getting hoisted by that batard, really.
	I do think that Hillary should have been prosecuted for those things.
	And it was an outrage that he didn't prosecute her for what she had done.
	She was involved in peddling information to foreign governments, just as Biden has done.
	But this is happening with all these people all the time.
	And I think it's kind of interesting.
	Greg Talent says, Hunter got away with so much more than a handful of firearm charges.
	Yeah. But I think it was interesting in his trial.
	What did he appeal to? He appealed to the Second Amendment.
	The thing that his father had wanted to spend his entire life trying to destroy every aspect of the Second Amendment.
	And this rascal Hunter appeals to it to save himself.
	And he appealed to jury nullification.
	That was really all that he had.
	You know, the Second Amendment, we really shouldn't have these firearm laws and everything.
	You really ought to let me go.
	And they didn't. But what hypocrisy for that.
	And what hypocrisy that he would get away with all these other crimes.
	Foreign corruption and everything.
	My son says Trump said he'd lock her up.
	He did nothing. If he's now saying that he's going to pardon Biden, does that mean that he's going to go on a revenge spree?
	Do just the opposite of what he's saying.
	Exactly. Yeah, that's the first time, you know, say he's going to pardon Hunter.
	It's the first time he's walked back even a little bit his claims of revenge.
	And I would expect that he's going to do exactly the opposite of what he has to say.
	I absolutely would. Well, I want to read some of your emails.
	There's been a lot of good emails sent to me.
	These are jumping all over the place in terms of different subjects, but we'll just kind of jump with this.
	This first one actually does tie in to what I've been talking about.
	Discord and balkanization.
	This is from Adam. He says, Google uses subtle psychology to create discord and balkanization.
	Yeah, they do. They do.
	He says, legitimate shows like yours are difficult to find with Google search, but shows that are outright condemned, even banned on X, and venues where you are not, are extremely easy to locate on Google.
	Google sticks them right up front in your face.
	I've said this for the longest time.
	If you leave... The CIA alone, you leave DARPA alone, you leave the military industrial complex alone, you don't talk about being anti-war, all these other things.
	If you just focus on race conflicts, they like that.
	They like that. They'll push you up front, even if they, in general, are pushing the other side of the race war.
	They'll push you up. You know, Paul Joseph Watson was never censored anywhere.
	Never. Isn't that interesting? I mean, he does some pretty strong call-outs of people, but it is all to serve the Hegelian dialectic of division, if you look at it.
	It doesn't do anything to give us a vision of what society should be like.
	It doesn't do anything to pull people together to unite them even on a cause, to unite them on a vision of where society should be.
	It doesn't call out the real culprits that are pulling the strings behind us when we see it.
	As a matter of fact, just the other day I went to Brave's search engine, because I know Google hides my stuff now.
	And they have incorporated in their search engine the Brave browser.
	They've incorporated some AI, and I don't know which one that they use.
	I just put in David Knight Journalist to see what they find.
	Because if you don't put in journalist or whatever, you'll get the motorcycle guy.
	They'll even show you an actor that I'd never, ever even heard of.
	Who was active in the 1930s and died probably about 70 or 80 years ago.
	They'll show you him, but they won't show you me on Google.
	And so when I asked Brave about myself, it came up with all kinds of crazy stuff.
	It said that I had taught journalism.
	Most of the stuff was tying me to Alex Jones and saying I'm a crazy conspiracy theorist.
	But it had this long thread about how I had been a journalist professor or something.
	This is why I say AI is crazy.
	Dangerously crazy and dangerously wrong.
	It had, of course, no mention of where the current show is.
	Nothing about that.
	But yeah, they do work very hard to make sure that they push certain things and hide certain things.
	That's what Google has become.
	A search engine that is designed to hide things.
	And if you understand its origins...
	If you understand the origins even of the internet, that's not a surprise.
	The internet was designed as a tool of psychological control, and Google was, you know, helped by these intelligence community and military-industrial complex people, the venture capital firms that were allied with them.
	This is from Sam, who says...
	Breaking exclusive, the deep state is going to be arrested.
	This is a new thing from Alex Jones.
	He sent this to me. He says, well, they're still at it.
	And this is not Steve Pachynik, even though it sounds like Steve Pachynik.
	This is Steve Bannon.
	You see, the game, it's not just history.
	It doesn't repeat itself.
	History rhymes, right? And so does the propaganda that they push out there.
	It was in 2020, right after, two days after the election, that Steve Pachenik told everybody that the whole thing was a sting, that they had blockchain watermark ballots, that the ballots had been printed and created by the federal government, by CISA, all of that stuff.
	Absolute nonsense. Every state...
	It creates its own ballot. There's no central creation of the ballots.
	He wouldn't show any of the ballots.
	He said, it's all working together.
	He just threw out a whole bunch of technological buzzwords, right?
	Blockchain, Watermark, quantum computing, and we've got 20,000 National Guard out there arresting people right now.
	And that's how Alex Jones began Stop the Steal.
	His second multi-million dollar, tens of millions of dollars, grift in 2020 after pushing the pandemic in the spring.
	And so now we've got Alex Jones and Steve Bannon.
	Steve Bannon is saying the deep state will be arrested after the Trump election.
	Pledge is Steve Bannon.
	Steve Bannon joins Alex Jones live to reveal what the retribution is.
	For the deep state will look like after Trump is re-elected in 2024.
	See? This type of...
	You want to know why Alex Jones is now the celebrity put back on Twitter and all the rest of the stuff?
	Because of this kind of stuff. And he isn't going away regardless of what he does with Infowars.
	He's still going to be around pushing this kind of garbage.
	He's almost got a pathological desire to be live on TV and be seen.
	I've never seen anything like it.
	Never seen anybody like that.
	Never seen anything like that before in my life.
	But people like Steve Bannon and others are pushing really hard.
	They want revenge.
	They want retribution.
	They don't want reform because, as I said before, they have no vision of what society should be like.
	All they do is promote Trump because that makes them money.
	And then another one from Adam, he says, in my opinion, he says you're spot on with the gain of function stuff.
	Why gain of function?
	Well, the stakeholders now have a never-before-seen Money mill disease with unlimited variants to treat forever and a day instead of a mild-mannered immunity builder that's been with us for at least tens of thousands of years.
	COVID, the common cold with an awesome press agent.
	That's right. They have to take what is...
	Ubiquitous. Whether or not it's dangerous.
	Pneumonia and a cold.
	Cold can go into pneumonia. Pneumonia can kill you, and it always has.
	It's been a fairly, you know, flu and pneumonia and cold, they all go together, and they have been there for a long time.
	They take something like that that is ubiquitous, and they make it the, you know, existential threat to us all.
	Same thing they do with CO2. Same thing they're doing now with nitrogen as well.
	Take stuff that is there that is common and then make it a threat.
	But, you know, COVID was the common cold with an awesome press agent, but it was also the common cold with an awesome press agent and a hospital death protocol that Trump paid them to do.
	That's what it really was.
	And so this was also sent to me by a listener.
	He said, yeah, there's only one solution to our battle against bird flu.
	We've got to somehow get little masks on the birds.
	And said this, I like this meme as well, sent this to me.
	This is what bird flu looks like under a microscope.
	Looks like money.
	That's what it looks like.
	Looks like money. And, of course, money and the love of money is the root of all evil.
	Cancer clinics with an alternative approach.
	Skipping over to another category.
	This is from Susan. She did a very nice job with an email.
	And I wanted to give this to a listener yesterday who said that his four-year-old son was diagnosed with Very rare form of cancer.
	And I want to say, the first place you want to turn to, the first thing you want to turn to is prayer.
	The first person you want to turn to is God.
	Sometimes God will provide for us at an ordinary means, and we should do everything that we can, but we need to understand that everything ultimately relies on God, and He can open those doors.
	And if he chooses to say no, we understand as well that he always works things out for good for those who love him.
	And so that is our key.
	That is what we put first, whether we're talking about politics or we're talking about our health, anything else.
	We put that first, always.
	But what can we learn that might help?
	And I played yesterday Dr.
	William Makis, and we rushed this at the very end of it to get the interview, and I hope you enjoyed the interview.
	I thought it's one of the most interesting people I've talked to.
	What an interesting life Peter Hammond has had.
	And what a contrast his life is to the embarrassed and ashamed, do-nothing Christianity that we see here in America for the most part.
	People are afraid to even talk about Christ.
	Seriously? If you're silent, the rocks will cry out.
	And they do cry out.
	They do cry out that there is a God.
	And the question is, has he spoken?
	Where has he spoken? And there is a very unshakable case to be made that's in the Bible.
	I believe that fully.
	But the Dr.
	Makis video that I played...
	Maybe only about a quarter of it.
	He's got, go to his substack.
	That's where you can see it. And he talks about ivermectin and recent articles about it, of course, in other countries where they're allowed to do medical research without being held captive to the moneyed interest that controls our government, like the big pharmaceutical companies.
	And so he talked about how in Iran they had looked at the mechanism of it and how it helps with cancer, you know, how it stops the tumors from building new blood vessels, how it...
	What it does to the stem cell of cancer and all these other things.
	So I highly recommend that.
	It's not just about how does it work, but it's also practical advice that he has in his video, which we really didn't play yesterday because, again, that's into the details.
	You won't take careful notes about it if you want to use it, but he talks a great deal about dosages that people have used in different studies.
	And what has been effective?
	And what has been tolerated in terms of high dosages, because you do want to take a high dosage of it to get it to work.
	And so he talks about several different protocols that people have used for several different situations.
	Most of the information that is there is anecdotal, but that's fine because they are not going to run any studies on it.
	It's just like when you look at medical marijuana addressing the neurological tremors and things that people had as a result of vaccines.
	And even in Texas, David Simpson, a great, honest legislator in Texas, the only one that I knew that was honest and principled.
	And He had a couple of families in his district.
	They had children who were vaccine-injured, and they had all kinds of seizures and things like that.
	And the only thing that would stop it, the parents were desperate.
	They tried everything, so they tried medical marijuana.
	At the time, they had to go to Colorado to get it, where it was the only place where it was legal.
	And he said, it's ridiculous that they can't get that here.
	And that they have to, if they bring it back here to give to their children, that they have this threat of going to jail for a very long time hanging over their heads.
	And so he was able to push through an exemption Because it did work.
	An exemption for that.
	They had a lot of hoops that you had to jump through.
	You had to try everything that Big Pharma puts out there that's expensive and useless and dangerous before you could use it.
	They had to document all of that.
	But they did have an exception to eventually allow you to use medical marijuana for that particular condition, even though they never legalized marijuana for medical use in Texas.
	And so they're not going to do the studies for these types of things.
	And if there's an anecdotal study, you know, that's at least something for you to take a look at.
	So here's the email from Susan.
	She said, And the two places are hoxybiomedical.com.
	That is spelled H-O-X-S-E-Y, biomedical.com.
	And Brzezinski Clinic, B-U-R-Z-Y-N-S-K-I-clinic.com.
	Now, I've heard of the Brzezinski Clinic before.
	And he has...
	He's had a really interesting history going back and forth.
	I really do believe that he has done a lot of scientific research to show this, but he's run into the bureaucracy and the corruption of the FDA. She says, the Hoxie Clinic is located in Tijuana, Mexico.
	My husband actually met a man who had pancreatic cancer and was cured at the Hoxie Clinic.
	The man was impressed by the affordability and the quality of care that he received.
	And the clinic picked him up in San Diego and drove him to the clinic.
	The Brzezinski Clinic is located in Houston, Texas.
	I could go on about the medical persecution by the AMA and the FDA.
	It was Hoxie for whom the term quack was coined.
	Both of these men went through this despite their success rates.
	There are alternatives out there.
	Rockefeller Medicine just doesn't want you to know about them.
	That's right. I don't claim to know that either of these hold the answer to your listener's child, but I'd like to proffer them as possibilities.
	Both the websites have a lot of information about what they offer.
	And on the Hoxie website, you can talk with a doctor.
	I hope you'll pass this information on to your listeners as alternatives to toxic chemotherapy, which killed my father.
	I'll just leave that right there.
	My father had cancer, but it was the chemotherapy that killed him.
	And just like this COVID stuff, they put down the cause of death as cancer.
	No, the cause of death. It was the first dose of chemotherapy that put him into a coma and killed him.
	So I hope you'll pass this on as an alternative to toxic chemotherapy and radiation treatments.
	So, in the meantime...
	She said, we pray for our Father's mercy in healing all children suffering from cancer and chronic diseases.
	Yes, absolutely. Thank you, Sue.
	I appreciate that. I did not know about the Hoxie Clinic, and I did not know.
	I'll have to look that up to see where the term came from.
	Uh, I want a new drug comes to mind, which was used by Weird Al, to I want a new duck.
	Maybe that's where the quack came from.
	I want a new drug.
	One that won't make me sick, you know?
	Anyway, one that won't make me feel three feet thick.
	In terms of what we said about the Ninth Circuit Court, this is a good point that I did not talk about yesterday, brought up by Natasha.
	It's important to remember, and I've mentioned this in the past, I should have mentioned it yesterday, that this infamous Jacobson case of 1905, and this was about a community of Massachusetts...
	Massachusetts always knows better than you what you should be doing.
	Busy body liberals.
	I tell you, that was like the point of origin of this cancer that spread out all over the country.
	Anyway, Massachusetts back in 1905 decided that they were going to mandate smallpox vaccines for everybody to stop the spread.
	And he said, I'm not going to get it.
	And he fought them all the way to the Supreme Court and he lost.
	But what he was fighting over was not being forced injected.
	He never got the smallpox vaccine.
	And that's a very important case to make.
	And, you know, I've made that in the past when I've talked about Dershowitz saying, well, I'll use Jacobson to say that we're going to drag you out of the house and we're going to force inject that, you know, and I'll argue this before the Supreme Court and I'll win because we've won with that type of thing before in the past.
	Well, as usual, Dershowitz is wrong.
	He's authoritarian.
	He's got these authoritarian urges.
	He has these, shall we say, this affinity for pedophiles and lowering the age of consent, which he has talked about lovingly.
	How to make the age of consent a lot younger.
	Anyway, Dershowitz has argued that point, and Natasha says there's an excellent debate between Dershowitz and Kennedy.
	When Kennedy brought up the point that he was never injected, they made him pay a fine.
	They said you're going to either get the vaccine or you're going to pay, I think it was a $500 fine in 1905.
	That was a lot of money.
	Still is a lot of money, but it was especially a lot of money before the Federal Reserve was created and devalued or debased our currency.
	And so he fought them to the Supreme Court because that was a lot of money.
	He lost, and so he had to pay the fine.
	But they never impinged on his bodily integrity.
	And they never forced medical treatment on him, which is what Dershowitz and so many others were using Jacobson, wanted to use Jacobson to do.
	But really, the real use of Jacobson in this Trump and Biden pandemic Was to intimidate people, to coerce people, in the same way that they did in Massachusetts.
	Well, you're either going to take this stuff or there's going to be a tremendous cost to you.
	And of course, they escalated the cost.
	You will lose your job, your career, whatever, if you don't take the jab.
	And so, the good news about this, it did not overturn Jacobson.
	And see, that's where the confusion is, I think.
	So many people don't realize that he never had to take the jab.
	So that's a key point.
	Thank you, Natasha, for bringing that to my attention.
	But he never had to take the jab.
	But people see this as, you know, a point of coercion.
	And... And so when the Ninth Circuit Court came back against this, and they tried to argue the Jacobson thing, and the way that they were using it in L.A. really was what was happening with Jacobson, in a sense, because they were saying that you're either going to take this or we're going to penalize you.
	Penalty, as I said, was going to be losing your job with a school district rather than paying a $500 fine.
	And so from that sense, it did go against Jacobson.
	But I think the most important thing about it...
	And it was surprising to see the Ninth Circuit, or any circuit, to see them challenge essentially a premise of a long-standing Supreme Court case, even one that's 120 years old.
	But they did say, you know, you're not going to force them to do this.
	But they didn't do it directly.
	They didn't say, the way they came about it was in an indirect way, by saying that this is not a vaccine.
	And so they didn't directly challenge Jacobson.
	If they would have just said, well, you have bodily integrity and you can't be forced to do it.
	Instead, what they said was, well, you've admitted that this doesn't prevent what you're injecting people for.
	You said that it only helps them to deal with it better if they get it.
	So it doesn't stop the contraction of the disease.
	It doesn't stop the spread of the disease.
	So it's not a vaccine, is what they said.
	And so by saying that, they avoided directly confronting the Jacobson decision.
	But what they did do, by saying that it's not a vaccine, I think the important point of all of this is that it challenges the legal immunity of Pfizer and Moderna that was given to them as part of the PrEP Act.
	That's what I would like to see people pick that up and use this Ninth Circuit Court decision to attack this and use that line of reasoning that these three judges from the Ninth Circuit Court did.
	You know, and they could always come back and say, well, we want to have it in bonk, right?
	We want to have all of the judges of the Ninth Circuit Court rule on this.
	And that's where they could bring their influence to bear, perhaps.
	And so this is three judges.
	You know, they don't have all the judges rule on all the cases.
	They typically have a subset of the judges rule on the cases.
	And then if there's a lot of political pressure, let's just put it that way, you know, or they think they got it wrong, but typically it's just political pressure.
	If there's a lot of political pressure, they'll come back and say, now we want to have all the judges rule on this.
	And if they do that, they could overturn this decision from the three judges because it was two to one.
	And we don't really know what the Ninth Circuit Court would do.
	The Ninth Circuit Court is one of the most liberal of the courts.
	And the liberals are very authoritarian in their perspective.
	So if they were to bring it back for all the Ninth Circuit, they could overturn it.
	But as it stands right now, they did not say that you can't force some, that you can't punish people if they don't take a vaccine, which is what Jacobson was about.
	It was about punishment. It was not about forced vaccination.
	It was about coercion to vaccinate.
	And they didn't directly address that.
	Instead, they said this is not a vaccine.
	Now, by saying it's not a vaccine, you could have a challenge to the legal immunity of Pfizer and Moderna because that was set up, the PrEP Act by George W. Bush, that was set up to protect these people from these experimental vaccines that they had planned to roll out ever since COVID. Um...
	Dark Winter. They've been running the simulations.
	They planned it long before that.
	That's just when they started actively simulating it and practicing it.
	Um... Let's see.
	I've got Michelle Obama.
	Thank you so much for the tip and for all your tips.
	I appreciate that. Your friends, West Michigan, gallows and stocks.
	I'm not sure what that means, but I think maybe that's the kidnap and kill people.
	I don't know what is happening with that, but...
	Star Goose. They went after Hunter for charges that don't implicate the big guy so they can claim the justice system isn't biased.
	That's right. It gives them cover.
	And the Republicans and the Trump press doesn't really understand that angle, I think, yet.
	Well, let me say that the reason I talk about this...
	I don't support anybody for president.
	There's major problems with all these people running.
	And I don't support the federal government in general.
	I don't support anybody for Congress because Congress has been a part of this pandemic and lockdown, just like Biden, just like Trump, both parties.
	And they have all given our government over to the bureaucracy to write the rules.
	We have regulation without representation.
	We have taxation without representation.
	What happened in 2020 was they just took that model of government that they have established de facto and started pushing it down to us at the state level, along with the rules that they'd pushed out back in 2001, the Model State Health Emergency Powers Act, so that we would be ruled by unelected bureaucrats.
	I've said that all politics is local.
	That is true.
	That's not a truism. That is absolutely true.
	George Soros understands that.
	Elon Musk pointed out that's why George Soros, said Elon Musk, spends his money at the district attorney level and at the state attorneys general because that's where he gets the biggest bang for the buck.
	And that's where we get the biggest bang for the buck as well.
	The lower you go in the elections, the more local you go in the elections, the bigger your vote is as a percentage of the total.
	It makes absolutely no difference for a president.
	I've watched this my entire life.
	I've watched the Libertarian Party focus on their presidential race.
	Largely because they wanted to try to retain ballot access.
	And it's like, okay, but what's the point of retaining ballot access if you don't get anybody elected at the local level where you can make a difference?
	You always focus on, you know, the presidential race and the Libertarian Party to maintain ballot access.
	And you're not getting it.
	You're not getting enough of a vote to keep the ballot.
	But again, just having ballot access...
	Doesn't matter if you don't do anything.
	And the only place that you're going to do anything, get anything done, is at the local level.
	And so, quite frankly, I wouldn't even bother voting if it wasn't for local candidates.
	I don't support anybody running for president.
	I don't support the entire Tennessee delegation of conservative Republicans.
	Voted along with Machiavelli and Mike Johnson.
	To spend hundreds, hundred billion dollars or whatever the total was.
	I forget now what it was, but all that money for Ukraine, all that money for Israel, not a dime for our border.
	Nothing for us, nothing for our country.
	Everything for foreign interests, everything for war.
	I don't support any of those people.
	If that's where the Republican Party is, a pox on them.
	There is a, you know, the difference, you know, the distinction between the two parties is a distinction without a difference, ultimately.
	The Uni Party is for most of the same stuff.
	And if you want to stop abortion and some other things like that, that's got to be done at the local state level.
	I've always said that.
	And that's what the Dobbs decision said as well.
	The Dobbs decision, Samuel Leto got it right.
	That's what I've been saying all along.
	The power to stop abortion...
	It was in the hands of all the states, all of the governors, because under the Tenth Amendment, the federal government had no ability to define when life begins.
	They have no ability to define marriage and so many things that they've gotten involved in.
	They have no ability to define a pandemic and to push these things on us.
	They did that.
	They pushed out that model legislation to the states because they knew the Tenth Amendment would block it.
	And they knew they could bribe the governors to do what they wanted to do.
	And so, yeah, I don't support a president who has bribed these governors to lock us down.
	And I don't support a president who has blackmailed businesses to force their employees to get injected.
	And that's just one of many existential issues.
	Where both Trump and Biden have betrayed us, and RFK Jr.
	as well. He'll do it with the climate stuff.
	Climate stuff is every bit as dangerous as this pandemic stuff, I think.
	Although, with the pandemic now, they're going directly after our food, but they're doing that with the climate change as well.
	Both of these MacGuffins, both climate alarmism and And the pandemic alarmism.
	They're using both of these things.
	Bird flu. We've got to shut down.
	Let's not test the birds.
	Let's test the cows.
	Let's go after the meat.
	Let's go after the dairy and all the rest of this stuff.
	Both of these things have now become leading-edge attacks on our food supply.
	So I don't support any of these people at the federal level.
	It has been completely captured.
	That's like asking me who I like in the FDA. Nobody.
	The NIH, nobody.
	We've got to find a way to nullify them, to establish the doctrine of the lesser magistrate.
	We need to understand that, and look, this is not just a legal theory.
	This actually worked in 2020.
	You could tell a difference.
	There was a big difference. It could be much worse or much better than what Trump was trying to pull on people during the lockdown based on who your local officials were.
	Your local government, your local sheriff, that type of thing.
	So focus your energy on that.
	That's where you can have an effect.
	You know, why focus on this other stuff?
	It's why the media always talks about this other stuff.
	So... Texas Coast South.
	Thank you for the tip. Says, thank you, David and Travis, for putting up with me.
	I'm just a green hippie sheep of the night group.
	Well, thank you. I haven't seen anything wrong about what you're doing.
	Greg Talent. I read that one.
	Let's see. Dustin Helm.
	This is from yesterday.
	I didn't talk about this. He says, one guy I know takes ivermectin.
	His teeth are growing excessively large.
	He laughs now with a kind of a nay or a whinny.
	So, yeah, it's for your horses, y'all.
	It turns y'all into horses.
	That's the next thing I expect the FDA to say.
	This is from For Love of the Road, one of our longtime biggest supporters.
	And he sent this to me.
	He said, is there a ticking time bomb?
	Researchers gained control of a truck.
	By hacking its ELD. That is the electronic logging device, I think is what the D stands for.
	This is the mandated thing on all of the big semi-trucks.
	They had to keep a log, and so they said, well, we'll do it for you.
	Isn't that nice? It's going to be so convenient.
	It's kind of like the video from...
	Ukraine saying, by 2030, after we've defeated Russia, we are going to have the, everybody will have a digital ID, and it'll be so wonderful, and all of your interactions with the DMV and all these other government agencies that you love so much.
	It'll just be streamlined.
	It's like, yeah, right. They're going to be in your pocket.
	They're going to be watching everything that you do all of the time.
	Well, that's what the electronic logging device, if the D is for device, that's what it does.
	It's mandated so they don't have to go through, uh, you know, keeping a log of when they were driving and where they were driving and all that kind of stuff.
	They're concerned.
	They don't want truck drivers driving more than the next number of hours a day and all of that kind of stuff.
	So now they got this onboard spy device that, um, looks how long they're driving.
	Probably looks at how they're driving as well.
	He said, I thought this would be a good subject for Goatree.
	Yeah, I should talk to him about this.
	Just curious if he knows anybody that's hacked into vehicles.
	Well, yes, Goatree and I have talked about this in years past.
	We talked about how in Las Vegas, every year, they have DEFCON, which is really kind of run by the military-industrial complex and the Pentagon, and they're making presentations, and it's a place where people go who want to work in cybersecurity and things like that.
	So it's kind of a way that you can...
	You know, kind of schmooze with these people and get to know them, that type of thing.
	Present papers and you get hired with a big paying job at the Pentagon or something.
	And then there's a more informal Black Hat Conference that follows the next week.
	And people there will do certain things like one year, and this is probably a decade ago or more, A guy showed that he could take over a Jeep and he could activate some of these things like the emergency braking.
	As they started putting systems under electronic control, he showed that he could hack into it and do certain things like that.
	And it came up again with Michael Hastings.
	If you remember Michael Hastings, that was how Joe Biggs got involved with Infowars.
	He got to know Michael Hastings, who was reporting on the Afghanistan war.
	And Michael Hastings wrote an article that was very critical of...
	Who was the guy that took the place of David Petraeus?
	I can't remember now offhand.
	But he was very critical of it, and they actually turned it into a movie with Brad Pitt, you know, just talking about how bureaucratic the war machine was, and how they would take one of these generals out and they put another one in.
	McChrystal, I think, was it McChrystal? Anyway, he made a lot of... Michael Hastings, who was writing for Rolling Stones at the time, was very critical of the bureaucracy and the failures that were going on in Afghanistan.
	And, of course, each of these generals has this entourage of other bureaucrats who follow them around.
	That's what the generals have become.
	They've become some massive bureaucracy.
	Just take a look at the number of generals that we had during World War II. And the number that we got today, I forget what the multiple is, but it's something like, you know, 20, 30 times the number of generals that we had during World War II. It's a very bureaucratic thing, the Pentagon is, in all aspects of it.
	But anyway, each one of these generals has got an entourage that follows them around, and their career is based on, you know, the career of the guy that they're serving.
	And so he made a lot of enemies out of them.
	I don't know.
	I'm not saying that they're the ones who killed him.
	I am saying that I don't believe it was an accident.
	I didn't for a minute believe that narrative about Michael Hastings because we talked quite some time before that.
	About the ability to hack cars and to control them.
	And actually, Richard Clark, who had been in a previous administration, maybe it was Clinton or something, and he'd had something to do with cybersecurity, had talked about, well, that might be a possibility.
	And so, because he was involved in all that, and because of the way the car accident was, the engine was ejected, Down the road in the direction that his car was headed at a very high speed.
	And then he veered off to the side and hit a tree.
	And the car was on fire from the front, not from the back where the gas tank was.
	And so everything about it looked to me like a bomb.
	Whether it was a planted bomb or whether it was a bomb from above or whatever.
	But the videos of him driving at really high speed, we eventually learned that Michael Hastings was working with an organization and he said, I'm working on a very dangerous story.
	And where he was staying, people said he was, every morning he would go out and he'd look underneath his car.
	Things like that, looking, I guess, to see if there was some kind of strapped-on bomb, but there's a lot more dangerous things than that now.
	And so he was concerned.
	And he said, I'm going silent.
	I'm going to get out of here because he thought things were getting close for some reason.
	And that's when he died.
	But before I'd heard all that, I said, something is wrong with this accident.
	I knew that they could hack these things.
	And it was interesting that he was driving a Mercedes because at the time, It had more controls than any other more electronic controls on, you know, the accelerator, the steering, the brakes, all that stuff.
	It had more control on that than any of the other cars at the time.
	So yeah, that is something that is there.
	Now, what is happening with us at this point in time?
	The engine was ejected in the opposite direction than the car was headed, right?
	No, I think it was ejected in the direction that he was headed.
	In other words, what they wanted to say was that the engine, they said the engine, he crashed into this tree and the engine was ejected down the road.
	I said, well, first of all, if he crashed front first, it's going to push that engine back into the car.
	It's not going to eject it a good distance down the road, as heavy as an engine is, right?
	It's not going to eject it at a right angle.
	And if the thing bursts into flames, I would expect it to be a rear-end collision for it to burst into flames.
	And so all that was suspicious to me, and then I knew that they hacked cars as well.
	Hastings' car crashed at like 140 miles per hour.
	Yeah, exactly. And I don't believe that...
	I don't know what the speed exactly was, but it was going very fast.
	But again, that's not going to cause the engine to eject at a right angle.
	It'd be pushed back into the car when it hits that tree.
	But talking about hacking and trucks...
	The Love of the Road says, Years ago, there was a big hullabaloo about a semi-truck being hacked.
	Turned out they were plugged into the ECM port with a laptop, which is not really hacking.
	This is the first I've heard of driving up alongside and hacking a truck through the Wi-Fi connection.
	I tried to find an article that you can read without creating a free account, but I couldn't.
	But he has a couple of these here.
	I'll see if I can find out some more information about it.
	I'll talk to Goat Tree about it as well.
	So... He said, Some ELDs are easy to hack.
	Everything is. As a matter of fact, one of the stories from Goat Tree is that at a Black Hat conference one year, A guy that he knows was going to demonstrate how vulnerable all of these electronic devices that they put on, you know, pacemakers and other things like that.
	But there's a lot of electronic devices that were being put in.
	And again, this was when I first started talking to Goatree.
	So it was about a decade ago.
	And this guy was going to give him a presentation about how vulnerable all these electronic devices were.
	And then the night before the presentation, he died of a drug overdose.
	And Goat Tree told me, this guy is as likely to use drugs as you are, David.
	He does not use drugs.
	I know him. And so, you know, there's things like that that are out there.
	And... They don't want people paying attention to that.
	Now, we also have, and this is just sent to me by a listener, I haven't had time to go through and look at it, but it was like a wide area network of bodies or something like that.
	Taking these medical devices and putting them on, creating a network of these things, and doing it not just for people who have medical devices, but doing it for everybody, everywhere.
	And so, you know, this is, they want to take the Internet of Things, which is part of their smart cities, right?
	They want to have, must have 5G or better.
	So they got the bandwidth to monitor everything that everybody's doing everywhere.
	David Petraeus said, we're going to be listening to people through their refrigerators.
	And when we reported what he had to say, everybody said, listen, these people are a bunch of wacko conspiracy theorists.
	Well, it's not a conspiracy theory.
	It's what they're working on.
	But they want to be able to implant electronics into everything to spy on us.
	That's what our government is concerned about with China, with Huawei being the substrate for the 5G cities.
	Because they know that the whole thing is set up to be a surveillance network, and they want to be the ones doing the surveillance, not China.
	And we run into the same thing now with Apple putting the OpenAI's Chat 4.0 onto the iPhone, and Elon Musk will talk about that coming up, says this is nothing but a massive spy network.
	All of this stuff.
	It's a massive spy network.
	Elon Musk's Twitter is a massive spy network.
	The internet is a massive spy network.
	All the social media stuff is a massive spy network.
	The phones. Again, you know, part of the Snowden release where they talked about the fact that the iPhone was Big Brother and that the zombies would line up to pay for it.
	All of this stuff.
	It's about surveillance, contact tracing, and the rest of it.
	But they've talked about the Internet of Things.
	They want to have everything that you use be tracked to track you.
	But they also want to track you directly, not just indirectly, through your devices.
	So everything is ultimately about that.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, I want to pick up with something that I didn't quite get a chance to finish yesterday.
	And that is the...
	A couple of articles about the Trump idolatry that is out there.
	It's not just the revenge, the Civil War aspect, and we will get to that, but it is also the outright idolatry that is being exhibited by so many of these people who want to make money off of this election and off of this.
	that there's a massive market out there that wants to be fed positive information about Donald Trump and then there's also a massive market out there that is on the other side.
	We'll be right back.
	Ok.
	yeah
	you you You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, again, there's a large market out there for the Democrats to push against Donald Trump.
	But again, all of their policies are really anti-freedom.
	Even the people, though, who are pro-freedom, people who are Christian, are now following Trump.
	And it's like, how is that being accomplished?
	Well, it's being accomplished by influencers.
	People who are making a lot of money, Pushing the idea that Trump supports market principles or the Constitution or any of these things that he did everything he could to destroy the first time.
	Or that he supports their Christian values.
	That there's no evidence of that.
	And again, when we look at, you know, the closest you could come to that is what happened with abortion, but he's made it pretty clear that personally he doesn't support it, and I don't think he's going to support it in his second term.
	Presidents always change, and for the worse, in their second term.
	And regardless of what happens, we're going to have a second term of Biden or of Trump.
	And both of them, either of them, are going to be far worse in their second term than they were even in their first horrible term.
	And so when we look at this song that I played a little bit of for you yesterday, The Chosen One, And you've got Wayne Allen Root bragging about the fact that he had come up with lyrics to all of this stuff.
	And the woman who is singing it, Natasha Owens, is somebody that I said she did a couple of, you know, I guess, I don't know how big they were because I don't follow contemporary Christian music, but she did some contemporary Christian stuff a couple of years ago.
	And then she did a couple of little devotions on her channel.
	I went to look at her channel like, you know, what is she really about?
	And she had, for example, three or four devotions.
	One of them was on the parable of the sower.
	I think most people have heard this, even if they're not Christians.
	But it was about two minutes ago.
	And the two minutes were mainly spent reading the parable of the sower, and then she had like a 10 or 12 second commentary about the meaning of it, which I'll play for you here.
	I want to challenge each and every one of you today to consider the story from a new perspective.
	Rather than just being the good soul, let's be the sower who searches the ground for soul ready to receive the good news of the gospel.
	So that is in response.
	I've never heard that interpretation before.
	I've heard a lot of people comment on that.
	Never heard that before. What she's saying is, in the parable, Jesus is talking about why what he says to people is not having an effect to some.
	He said, some of them it bears fruit.
	But other ones are like rocky ground, and it doesn't really take root, or the birds come in and they pull it away, or it springs up for a little bit, but it can't get down deep because there's a lot of rocks there.
	And he explains it, which he doesn't typically do in his parables, so there's not really much question about what he's really talking about.
	And, but in that, he's talking about his work as he's sowing seed.
	He's kind of throwing this out there.
	Let those who have ears to hear, hear it.
	And that's really kind of the way that we operate as well.
	I don't know if somebody is prepared to hear something, but that's not up to me.
	That's up to God who prepares the heart.
	It's up to God who You know, tills the soil or whatever so that somebody's ready to hear something.
	My responsibility and most Christians' responsibility is just to say what's true and let the seed fall where it will.
	And whether or not it is received, that's between that person and God.
	And yet she took exactly the opposite interpretation of it.
	Her interpretation was, well, let's, you know, first of all, make sure we're good soil.
	And then she says, let's look for the right kind of soil to sow this on.
	Now, that's kind of an approach that has been the seeker-friendly church, which is based on the false premise that there are people who are seeking God.
	There's nobody who seeks God, as Isaiah said, right?
	We've all turned from the way.
	Now, if we're looking for God, that means, and if we're hungry for God, that means that God has done something to us to change us from that.
	But in terms of catering to people, that's what the Seeker Friendly Church has done.
	I think what has come out of that is this timidity.
	Well, you know, these people are moving in the right direction, so let's be tender with them.
	No, you need to give them the truth and not be afraid that the information is not going to be received.
	But I thought, why would she take that interpretation of it?
	Well, you know, in a sense, that's what the Trump media is doing, isn't it?
	Let's find a receptive audience and cater to them.
	Which is exactly what her new direction is.
	She's out there saying, you know, Trump won.
	That's her one song. She made a big hit with that.
	Because she's found a new audience that is going to be receptive to her music.
	They don't really care if the music is any good.
	I mean, it's really pretty generic stuff.
	You know, who cares about this?
	It's very commercial, formulaic, generic stuff.
	I'm not saying here's something divine.
	Yeah, but then they are talking about him being divine.
	And they are talking about how he doesn't have to be...
	It doesn't have to, as I said yesterday, your idols don't have to be divine.
	You can make an idol out of money and not think that it's godly or whatever.
	You can make an idol out of anything.
	And so... You know, she and Wayne Allen Root are really pushing this idea of Trump being the chosen one.
	And he's very proud of the fact that this got picked up.
	That he kind of co-wrote this.
	And as I said very quickly yesterday, it truly is amazing to me how Wayne Allen Root has found this as his formula for success.
	To attach himself to Trump and to be an endless cheerleader for Trump.
	He says, Well, please make that clear to us.
	Tell us why you think that's the case.
	But he doesn't. He just makes these blanket statements.
	I think God's purpose is not to glorify America.
	I think God's purpose is not to glorify Trump.
	God's purpose when we look at all this may be to judge America.
	When you look at the leaders that we have, having awful leadership as we do, God points out that that is a hallmark of his judgment, that we would have awful leaders that would be hell-bent on destroying this very country.
	I think that is exactly what is going on.
	I don't think that, you know, if Trump is God's chosen one, he's God's chosen instrument of judgment and destruction on this country, just like Biden is.
	But he says, Jesus Christ was demonized, condemned, and found guilty at trial.
	He says, Moses was demonized, insulted, and challenged, and threatened again and again by his own people.
	And then he talked about Nelson Mandela.
	And I mentioned this yesterday as an introduction to the interview that...
	He says he didn't like Mandela's ultra-left politics, but he loved Mandela's charm.
	And as you heard in the interview yesterday, Peter Hammond goes in, Peter Hammond was straight up with him.
	No, I didn't support you.
	I fought against you.
	Oh, you like apartheid? No, I don't like apartheid.
	But I'm opposed to Marxists like you.
	And of course, Mandela had been a terrorist, which people like Wayne Allen will never acknowledge, his terrorism.
	But as you also heard from that story, after he had that encounter with Mandela, talking about Mandela's putting abortion into the Constitution and many other immoral things that he embedded in there, After that confrontation, after that discussion, and after he said, no, I don't want to have my picture taken with you.
	You know, you may take your picture now.
	And it's like, what would I do with a picture of me and Mandela?
	I don't want a picture of that on it.
	After that total rejection of Mandela by Peter Hammond, as soon as he gets home, he's got the IRS on his doorstep, their version of it.
	And it's not just the IRS, it's their key people.
	They would typically send after the biggest corporations, and they found that he owed nothing.
	He said his wife had to pay $1,000.
	I don't know if it was dollars or rands.
	I mean, if it's rands, that's maybe about a $60 penalty or something.
	But they went back and audited them for the past 13 years on that.
	Fine-toothed comb, but they did not owe any taxes on any of that.
	They found some minor thing on his wife that was very, very minor, but that was their top people.
	In other words, Mandela, face-to-face, very charming, personable.
	But in reality, he's a cold calculating Stalinist who tries to destroy his enemies.
	He may not be as overt about it like his wife was, Winnie Mandela, taking their political opponents and necklacing them, putting a tire around their neck and setting it on fire to execute them.
	He was a lot more subtle about it and a lot more successful.
	But Wayne Allen Root says, Mandela went from convict to president just as Trump is about to do.
	Well, Trump is about to deceive us and about to destroy our country in the same way that Mandela did.
	So, again...
	This is the type of thing that is the career path for people like Natasha Owens.
	The career path for people like Wayne Allyn Root.
	And he just continues in every paragraph, practically.
	To talk about how Trump is chosen.
	Yes, I believe Trump has also been chosen to protect Israel and Jewish people.
	Thank you, President Trump. Trump really has literally been chosen by God, second and expert, because he's the only man in history who could withstand the fire, the persecution, the impeachment, the indictments.
	Well, if you're going to be persecuted, let it be for just things.
	Trump did not want to stand on the side of the J6ers, whom, as I pointed out, he could have pardoned before they were found guilty, before they were even charged.
	We've had that happen in the past twice.
	We've had Gerald Ford do that with Richard Nixon.
	We had President Johnson, Andrew Johnson, do that for all of the Confederate soldiers.
	He pardoned them all before they were even charged.
	Indicted for insurrection.
	And Trump could have and should have done the same thing.
	And why didn't he?
	Well, because he did not want to withstand the fire, the persecution, the impeachments, and the indictments.
	But you know what? Cowards get indicted too, don't they, Benedict Donald?
	Cowardly people who refuse to stand up for principle usually are the ones who are lined up.
	That's another thing that Peter Hammond said.
	When he talks to the terrorists, he's got a couple of tracks.
	He's got tracks for terrorists. He's got the gospel for gorillas and things like that.
	One of the things that he tells them is that you know what's going to happen to you when the guy that you're fighting for gets in office.
	He's going to eliminate you because you're a threat to him eventually, perhaps.
	And so that's what always happens to these people.
	You have somebody like Trump who throws his supporters under the bus for his own perceived self-interests.
	Well, then guess what?
	Because he wouldn't stand for principle, they come for him anyway.
	So, again, all the idols are not made out of wood, but this one has feet of clay.
	Definitely does. So, just in general, when you look at what has happened to the church, I think, this article from Dissenter says, Contemporary worship is a breeding ground for idolatry and for false worship.
	The Christian contemporary music industry is a modern-day embodiment of false worship and idolatry, mooching off the name of Christ to launch careers.
	This is exactly what is going on with people like Natasha Owens.
	And she's not the only one.
	bigger names than that, only to end up apostatizing and blaspheming him and to support the very things that God abhors like homosexuality, abortion, and more.
	The industry is a prime example of how worship can become a shallow veneer.
	Think of a gold-plated apple.
	Rotten to the core. Masking a reality of self-indulgence and rebellion against God's holiness.
	This industry is littered with so-called worship artists who start out professing the name of Christ only to later reject Him in favor of worldly acclaim.
	These artists, whether it be Hillsong, Elevation, Jars of Clay, Cadman's Call, Lecrae, DC Talk, they use Christianity to gain popularity only to turn their backs on God once they've achieved their success.
	It's an all-too-familiar pattern, and we've seen it with so many of these famous groups that are out there.
	They're quick to align themselves with whatever culture is willing to pay them for their music, and that's what's going on right now with a song, for example.
	Oh, she can make a quick buck praising Jesus?
	Well, I can make even more money praising Trump.
	Let me do that.
	In Hosea, Israel is likened to an unfaithful wife chasing after other lovers, but just as Israel turned to idols and forsook the Lord, so too has contemporary worship scene turned to the idols of fame, fortune, and cultural relevance.
	And now politics can be added to that as part of the cultural relevance.
	They sacrifice their integrity on the altars of popularity and acceptance, committing spiritual adultery against God.
	And Trump is encouraging them.
	Why? Because the Democrats have gone full on against the values of Christians.
	But it's not to say that the Republicans support those values.
	Again, the solution is local.
	Your relationship with God is not anything that they have any control over.
	And they never will.
	They can outlaw Christianity like they do in some of these other countries, and yet they can't stop you.
	They can't stop Christians in these Marxist countries in Africa.
	They can't stop you. They can't stop Christians in China.
	There's nothing they can do to stop you from worshiping God, to stop you from taking your family along with you to heaven.
	There's nothing they can do against this if we do this at the local level.
	Ability to have a free and prosperous country does not depend on Trump.
	It depends on God.
	God is the one who gives us peace and prosperity.
	The founders of this country understood that, but people don't understand it today.
	They said liberty is a blessing from God, and it is.
	And they understood that.
	And even people who, if you look at their writings, people like Franklin and others, they seem to be deists or whatever.
	And yet, even they would say that God had providentially let America exist as a nation and had blessed them with victory and with peace and with liberty.
	Not so today. Today we look to politicians and we look to government to give us peace and liberty and prosperity.
	We have made a God not just of Trump.
	We have made a God of government.
	Government is our idol.
	Washington, the city of Washington, is our idol.
	That's why we've got to put somebody on that throne.
	Who do I want on that throne?
	Who do I want?
	As Peter was talking about Lincoln, they literally, and it's described that way in the Park Service, they said they built a temple to him.
	They're not even trying to hide the fact.
	Now, the Lincoln Memorial is a temple.
	That's the legacy of Lincoln.
	This all-powerful, omnipotent government.
	And now, with the technology we have, it has become omnipresent, as well as knowing everything about us, omniscient.
	And so it has tried to create the...
	And you look at that, too, right there.
	I never noticed that, you know, the front of the...
	Look at this. In this temple.
	In this temple. I had never noticed that the sides of his chair there were fascista, is the way I pronounce it.
	But, you know, the fascist symbol of Rome that became the symbol of Mussolini and the fascist and so forth.
	But it truly is fascism.
	We have made a god of government, and so it's not surprising that people worship Trump, is it?
	And that's why we have the kind of problems that we do in this country, because we are worshiping government.
	The contemporary Christian music industry is a mere microcosm of the larger issue within the professing church today.
	A breeding ground for false worship and for idolatry.
	And here's one example of this before we get back to the politics stuff.
	I was absolutely stunned to see this article of a Texas woman who's visiting a church service, and she talked to local news about it, KBTX News.
	She said she's blind and she has a service dog.
	And this was a new contemporary church that was opening up, and they turned her away.
	Because they said, your guide dog is going to get stressed.
	We've got a lot of flashing lights, and we've got loud music, and it's going to be inappropriate for a guide dog, so you can't come in here.
	What a perversion of Christianity, right?
	People who should be all about opening up the eyes of people, when you've got somebody who's literally blind, they turn her away.
	Because we've got flashing lights and loud music and your guide dog is going to be messed up.
	Well, they don't know anything about God.
	And they don't even know anything about guide dogs for that matter.
	We used to work with guide dogs for the blind, and they were based in New York, and they had puppy raisers that were all up and down the East Coast from New York, where their headquarter, New York State, where their headquarters was, down to North Carolina, they had puppy raisers.
	What these people would do is for the first year or so of these dogs, they would...
	They would do certain things with them as they're raising them, and these people from the facility in New York would come down on a regular basis to see how these dogs were progressing, and they would do evaluations of them periodically every few months.
	And they had breeds of dogs that were yellow and black labs, who had great dispositions to begin with.
	They also used to do German shepherds.
	They had very few German shepherds.
	And the reason for it was that the German shepherds would become so attached to the puppy raiser family that it would be difficult for them to get reattached to the blind person that they eventually put this dog with.
	And even the few that they had, they would come down and constantly move them from one family to the other, so they would not get an attachment until they got to the final person they were going to be with.
	But the labs were great.
	They loved everybody, you know.
	And they had bred these dogs specifically to have a particular intelligence and a particular temperament.
	And then they did training for them as well.
	But not all of them passed.
	They would come down, and again, like I said, we were working with them.
	We weren't puppy raisers, but we were doing some other things with them.
	We'd watch the evaluations, and they would do things like take them into public areas and expose these dogs to sudden surprising things that they'd never seen before, loud noises and stuff like that, and they would watch how they reacted to that.
	One of the things that they would do is they would have the puppy on a leash, and they'd come around a corner, and there'd be somebody that'd come around the corner with an umbrella, and they would suddenly open up the umbrella right in front of the dog's face.
	Now, the appropriate response for a guide dog would be to stop, look at it, evaluate it, calmly move around and go the other way.
	If the dog freaked out, started barking, or got scared and ran away, you fail.
	And what they did with the dogs that failed was they put them in arson programs and bombing programs and things like that to detect stuff like that.
	But the dogs that succeeded were really the cream of the crop.
	Again, specially bred for this stuff, trained for it, and then evaluated for it.
	These people don't know anything about guide dogs, for example.
	But they certainly don't know anything about the Spirit of Christ.
	To turn somebody away because we don't think you're compatible with our worship service.
	Isn't that amazing? I had somebody say to me, she said, well, I'm not denying you, I'm denying your service animal.
	Well, by extension, you are denying me because Betty and I are a cohesive unit.
	There was just this feeling of being turned away, this feeling of embarrassment, this feeling of being excluded from something.
	And of course, we have churches who turn people away because they don't embrace the LGBT religion.
	They don't embrace the idols of LGBT and all the rest of this stuff.
	While governments, businesses, they're turned away from churches that do embrace all that stuff.
	While governments, businesses, and non-profits must comply with the American Disabilities Act and allow service animals entry into their spaces, churches and religious institutions are exempt.
	I guess they expected that a church or religious institution would go out of their way.
	To accommodate people.
	How foolish to think that, I guess.
	So she said her dog has years of extensive and specialized training, including being calm and focused throughout all sorts of noise and chaos that she should be able to decide what sort of environment is inappropriate or not.
	And I have to say that they did her a great favor.
	Because when you look at the other, you look at the Trump worship that's going on in a lot of these places, and again, Michael Flynn setting up these pseudo-church services with Reawaken America and, you know, leading people in a church building, leading them in prayers to ascended masters from this theosophist, Elizabeth Clare Prophet, verbatim plagiarizing her prayers and stuff like that.
	Or this, a church holds a Shrek-themed church service.
	For the usual goofy reasons, says Protestia.
	Last summer, Pathfinder Church in Ellisville, Missouri, put up a Shrek-themed church service as part of their Real Gospel series, and they spell real, R-E-E-L, as in Hollywood.
	The promo material for the four-week series reveals that because, quote, all of our best human stories contain echoes of divine truth.
	Well, I don't know.
	I mean, there's, like, real stories in the Bible that have divine truth, not just elements of it.
	I wonder how, in their Shrek program, how they handle the Larry King tranny character.
	And so, you know, they've got a series of these things.
	I guess, you know, we have week number four of our book of Shrek that we're going to be doing here.
	Apparently, they can't find what they need in the Bible, but they can find it in Shrek.
	Isn't that amazing? And then you have, as I said before, it's not just the people who are blind that are being kicked away, but you have the blind leading the blind in some of these places.
	A virtue-twerking white pastor is the headline from Protessia.
	It says, churches whose staff pages feature mostly white people should burn down their website.
	And... This is a DEI consulting non-profit that he co-chairs.
	They call it the One Race Movement.
	Now, you know, if we really do understand the Bible, the Bible says that God has made all nations of one blood.
	I like the way Ken Ham put it.
	He said, we're all just, we're the human race.
	It's one race. We don't divide by, you know, Jew and Greek or black and white and all these other things.
	God has made of one blood all nations.
	And so that really is the approach that we should take, but that's not the approach that these DEI people take.
	He has no criticism of all black churches, for example.
	He says, if you've got a majority white church, the worst thing you can do is have your staff page up on your website.
	In fact, I was just looking at a church a few months ago.
	Their entire staff was white, except for their janitor.
	He said, just take the whole thing down.
	Just burn your website down.
	Burn it down. What are we doing?
	What are we doing? We don't think that people are looking at that.
	Yeah, he is looking at the external, isn't he?
	And he's pushing people away.
	This pastor says, Lydia could have been a lesbian, and Paul should sit this one out.
	And, of course, this is a woman wearing a rainbow cloak and calling herself a pastor.
	So, you know, what do we do to approach this stuff?
	Well, again, I think that if you look at these people who say that they are inclusive, they're not.
	Just as these people who say that they want liberty but they are slaves to sin, these people are slaves to bigotry.
	And they have no tolerance of other people.
	They don't preach unity.
	They preach tribalism.
	They work to try to separate people.
	My son writes, the Trump song could have been written by AI. Yeah, exactly.
	I've heard AI-generated music that was much better and less generic-sounding than it does.
	That's right. Wayne Allen could be replaced by AI easily, I think, as well as Natasha Owens.
	He says, when I think of Christianity and divine truth, I don't think of Shrek.
	Yeah, me neither. KWD68, most of modern Christian music is marketing and merchandising for false churches like Bethel.
	There's open transvestites at their music awards.
	Dustin Helm, I went to a non-denom church about 10 years ago.
	They paid $1,000 a month to sing and display lyrics to songs.
	It's just a gift that keeps on giving.
	You are not a royal priesthood.
	You are a priesthood of royalties.
	That's what we've got at those churches.
	He says, you can show, Maga, all the evidence that Trump's tyranny is gun control, elitism, and it has zero effect.
	They're hopelessly indoctrinated, you know?
	That's what we don't want to be.
	And DG8, David, maybe Natasha can go on tour with Julie Green.
	Well, that'd be great. Maybe, you know, Julie Green could foresee where they're going to be making the most money and they could focus on those areas.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	We'll be right back. You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Civil War. Is this something that Canada is concerned about?
	I was talking about how the right is pushing it, how Alex Jones and Steve Banner say, yeah, we're going to get our revenge.
	Trump is saying that everywhere.
	Well, it's the left is saying it as well.
	Here's Politico, and this is put up by the Drudge Report.
	This is being pushed left and right.
	Canada's big worry, a U.S. civil war.
	A report from within the Canadian government says it's time for Canada to get ready.
	The think tank housed within Trudeau's government is already pondering the question of civil war in the U.S. In a spring report titled Disruptions on the Horizon.
	Disruptions. That's the way.
	Remember Fauci when asked how you're going to get everybody in the world to take an experimental vaccine?
	Well, you do it with disruption, you do it from the inside, and you do it iteratively, right?
	What are they working on with the Civil War?
	Well, doing it from the inside.
	Both sides are doing it from the inside.
	Doing it with disruption and doing it iteratively.
	The report was titled Disruptions on the Horizon.
	A quiet office known as the Policy Horizons Canada.
	Proposed American Civil War as a scenario that Ottawa should be preparing for, the capital of Canada.
	Since the 2016 election, they said left-leaning non-profits, this is Politico talking, And they're left-leaning, right?
	Since the 2016 election, left-leaning nonprofits have indulged in endless speculation and role-playing exercises about having to defend democracy.
	And, of course, since Trump got elected, in other words.
	One hysterical episode in 2020 involved a war game simulation that ended with Biden and his allies encouraging the entire West Coast to secede from the Union.
	Okay, so there were a lot of these, especially in California.
	My program began in 2017, July 2017.
	And by that time, the left was in a fit of hysteria and talking about secession, many different places.
	And so I found the largest group in California that was talking about secession, and that was my very first guest on my show.
	Somebody from the left talking about secession.
	Because I like to portray this as some kind of a fascist type of, you know, right-wing type of thing.
	And, of course, the left can be equally fascist.
	But I brought the bone.
	It's like, how can I help you to secede?
	I understand there's conservative enclaves within California, but for the most part, you know, there's been something of an issue for the rest of us.
	Pull in these globalist agendas and try to normalize them and help to impose them on the rest of us.
	And so I said, how can I help you to secede?
	I agree with you. I think you should go.
	Bye-bye. How can I help?
	And so, they admit that.
	It was a big thing after Trump got elected.
	The Policy Horizons report says Politico struck me as different, though.
	Not dark fan fiction from American partisans, but a sober branch of a friendly foreign government contemplating our national crack-up.
	And, again, I think it'll be over Trump, right?
	You have the...
	Trump derangement on the left, and you have the Trump delusion on the right.
	We're cracking up over Trump.
	We crack up literally with this stuff.
	The Policy Horizons Report surveyed hundreds of experts and government officials about disruptive events that Canada might do well to prepare for.
	The authors classed those scenarios based on the likelihood that they will occur, and how soon they might happen, and how much chaos they might create. American Civil War ranked as an improbable but ultra-high impact event.
	Other scenarios in that general category included the proliferation of homemade biological weapons, the rise of antibiotic-resistant pathogens, leading to mass death and food shortages, and the outbreak of World War III. The plausibility of the Civil War scenario, said one individual, depends on how one defines Civil War.
	How extensive would it be?
	Practical applications are not as obvious.
	How do you act on this, said one person.
	He said, you know, if World War breaks out...
	There are some things that you have very little control over.
	And there are things where you have full control.
	And this is exactly where we are.
	As a non-belligerent, as a non-partisan, as an independent, as somebody who's not cheerleading Biden or Trump or even RFK Jr.
	or the Libertarians. I'm not cheering any of these people.
	As a person earlier said, you know, so who are you for?
	I'm not for any of them.
	And I say that often and I usually quote Tree Bird.
	I'm not altogether on anyone's side because they're not on my side.
	And they're not on the side of the Constitution.
	And they're not on the side of liberty.
	And they're not on the side of peace.
	And so we, like the people in Canada who are looking at this, we are...
	Third-party observers of a lot of things that we have no control over.
	And we're just observers of these reckless idiots who may set fire to the neighborhood, or they may build a big bomb in their barn and blow up our house as well.
	And so what do we do about this?
	Well, understand there are some things where you have full control.
	And as we look at this, and Canada is looking at it, right?
	These people in Canada, it's like, well, you know, there's not really anything that we got any control over.
	It's whether or not, you know, politics is going to blow up into the Civil War or whether there's going to be World War III. But there are certain things that they can do in Canada, right?
	And that's the way it is with us as well.
	There's a lot of things that we have no control over, but there's a lot of things that we can do something about.
	There's a lot of things where you have full control.
	Full control.
	And you have full control over yourself and over your family.
	You have some control over your community.
	You can exercise some control over that.
	But as you get further away...
	From your home and your household, the control diminishes until you get to Washington.
	And you have no more control over Washington and what's going to happen there than the Canadian government does.
	As a matter of fact, you've got less influence than the Canadian government does.
	And they're looking at this and wringing their hands.
	So why would we think that we're going to be able to influence anything, whether Trump or Biden?
	We can't. Most contemporary civil wars, whether it's in Yemen or Sudan, for instance, are not helpful reference points for the United States.
	They involve weak governments and poor countries, often with destabilizing interference from neighboring regimes.
	So is this just idle provocation?
	Well maybe not entirely, says Politico.
	There is one credible scenario for American Civil War that is drawn not from the distant past, drawn not from far away, but from a recent nearby example.
	Canada's own past.
	The Quebec separatism battles of the 1960s was not a full-blown civil war, but it was a sustained violent attack on the state carried out by sectional militants who believed that the federal system had changed in unacceptable ways.
	Nearly a decade of bombings, robberies, kidnappings culminated in the October crisis of 1970 when the Quebec separatists abducted and murdered Pierre Laporte.
	The province's deputy premier.
	This was a period of brutal, traumatic civil strife.
	Let me say there was about that same time that we had the situation with Operation Gladio.
	I forget the exact dates of that, but that was when they had the Italian prime minister, who was a lefty, was kidnapped by people who were supposed to be communists.
	They were the Red Brigade.
	Remember, red didn't mean Trump supporters at that point in time.
	It didn't mean Republicans. Red has always been the color of communism.
	And the Red Brigade posed as communists, except the Red Brigade was really NATO. It was really a false flag movement.
	It was part of Operation Gladio, where NATO said, well, if we were rapidly overrun by the Soviet Union, we're going to have people, personnel, material that we have embedded, and we'll be able to fight a guerrilla war.
	That did not happen.
	Instead, you had... Lyman Limitzer, who was kicked out of JFK's administration because he was trying to push what was happening with the Bay of Pigs and other things like that, and he kicked him out.
	And he then became head of NATO, and while he was there, they ran Operation Gladio.
	Very dangerous character.
	And so NATO pretended to be communists, and they kidnapped the Italian prime minister.
	And Steve Pachinic, It was sent by Henry Kissinger as an American envoy.
	And according to the Italian government, who ran an investigation and a trial, the Italian government said that Steve Pachenik realized that Aldo Morrow was on to the false flag.
	So they ordered his execution.
	It's interesting that you had somebody abducted and murdered around 1970.
	And it was done by Quebec separatists.
	Interesting how these things kind of align, isn't it?
	And of course, I think it's interesting that you've got people like Steve Pachinik trying to push this idea that we need to use force.
	You know, Steve Pachinik was the first one who pushed Nobody Died at Sandy Hook stuff.
	And at Infowars.
	And he tried to push that with the Las Vegas shooting with my program.
	I said, nope, you're wrong.
	And so he tried to set me up, and it was just a few months after my program had started.
	And then he came in with the sting and began the stop the steal thing, which was an entrapment from the very beginning.
	It was a grift, and it was an entrapment.
	And so they say that what happened in Quebec was a period of brutal, traumatic civil strife.
	And in a post-January 6, post-Steve Pachenik-Alex Jones sting world, it is not wild speculation to envision a similar sequence of events in the U.S. Maybe this time with Steve Bannon instead of Steve Pachenik.
	We are a heavily armed country with a contested federal system and proud, powerful, provincial identities.
	Some of our states, like Texas and California, are quasi-national entities already.
	The next president is sure to be loathed by much of the country and likely seen as illegitimate by at least a large minority.
	That's what they're working on, you see.
	And if we believe that our problems must be and can be solved in Washington, even if we say Washington is our biggest problem, well, we've got to get control of that.
	If we take that approach, you know, understand that the conservatives now, not just the liberals, but the conservatives want an all-powerful government to fix what's wrong.
	And if you want all power to be in Washington, you're going to be willing to fight over that power.
	This focus on national federal elections is such a grift, and it is such a trap, and I don't want to see people falling into it.
	That's not where our solution lies.
	Our solution is in weakening Washington, not strengthening Washington.
	We don't want to put somebody in the seat of Satan.
	We want to isolate that thing and weaken that thing.
	And then you look at, so Canada is looking at, well, there's going to be a civil war in the United States.
	Well, guess what? There's already a civil war in Mexico, a failed narco state.
	Destroyed over our war on drugs.
	This failed policy that is now more than 50 years old.
	Put in by Richard Nixon.
	As I've said many times, drugs are a big problem.
	And, you know, tell everybody to stay away from drugs.
	But should we have a...
	Should we destroy our country over the likes of Hunter Biden?
	Somebody who, for whatever reason, is...
	And again, I think it's a spiritual...
	You can talk about it being a medical issue, a psychological issue.
	It's a spiritual issue, but it is not a law enforcement issue.
	You notice that nobody's even talking about drug crimes for Hunter Biden, even though he was, according to his former wife or girlfriend, a massive user of crack cocaine.
	Crack cocaine itself, created by the CIA. That was exposed by Gary Webb.
	It was a series of investigative reporting, Dark Alliance.
	He won a journalism prize for that.
	And then they wanted to destroy his credibility.
	So they had an entire team at the LA Times devoted, like a dozen people, devoted to discrediting him with the public.
	And they did. And they got him purged for a while.
	But he was coming back.
	And he was going to fight this stuff.
	And he was a real fighter.
	You know, like some other people that we've been told committed suicide.
	People like Aaron Schwartz, who was fighting the CISPA and CISA and all the rest of these things, these other instantiations of it.
	And, you know, we were told just like we were told with Aaron Schwartz that he committed suicide.
	I don't believe it for a minute.
	But we do know now, it has been confirmed, Freeway Ricky Ross and other people who are involved in it said, yeah, this was the CIA. They created crack cocaine.
	They targeted the black community there in L.A. primarily, but all over in general.
	They created that.
	The CIA created that.
	The CIA's biggest drug company, drug cartel anywhere in the world.
	And, of course, you know, they were doing this kind of stuff in Afghanistan, the poppy fields and other things like that.
	But they wanted to fund their black operations, their secret war in Central and South America.
	So they created crack cocaine.
	So you've got Hunter Biden, the son of the guy who's been elevated and promoted and selected by the CIA. So the CIA creates crack cocaine.
	They create the Biden presidency.
	And then Hunter is addicted to this stuff.
	But should we destroy our justice system, our constitution?
	Should we corrupt our courts and our cops over the likes of Hunter Biden?
	It is a spiritual problem.
	And this guy is one of the darkest individuals that have come to light publicly.
	When we create this drug war, as is typical of all drug wars, as is typical of alcohol prohibition, it was very short-lived, especially considering this war on drugs over 50 years old.
	In the short time that you had alcohol prohibition, it created all these organized crime families.
	It created also A more concentrated consumption of far more intoxicating forms of alcohol.
	And that always happens with prohibition.
	You always get more.
	You give a monopoly to organized crime, so you get more organized crime.
	And you get more concentrated forms of whatever the thing is that you're trying to prohibit.
	So now we've got fentanyl. Fentanyl is a creation of the drug war and so is the Civil War in Mexico.
	You've now got Mexican cartels that are using land mines, land mines against police or using improvised explosive devices, remote control, but they're putting land mines out there as well.
	One A video that went viral showed a soldier being killed, four others injured.
	This was back in January.
	A grainy video that circulated on social media.
	Then four more soldiers died.
	Nine others were wounded when another explosive device detonated in the same region.
	Three laborers killed, two others injured by yet another mine, leaving a truck split in half and human remains scattered across a dusty road.
	These series of blasts are coming from Tierra Caliente.
	I guess hot land.
	It's gone hot.
	I guess it's always hot there.
	It marks an alarming escalation of violence in Mexico's criminal groups, armed themselves with ever more sophisticated and deadly weaponry.
	The drug war has now come to resemble actual warfare.
	Because if you take a situation, just take a look at the alcohol provision.
	But you had in the 1920s and so forth.
	What happened was you had these gangs using Thompson submachine guns to mow each other down.
	And of course, collateral damage that was there, other people, innocent bystanders taken down as well.
	Well, this thing has been going on for 50 years.
	They've gone far beyond machine guns.
	They have all kinds of things.
	It's an arms race.
	They have grenade launchers.
	They have drones that are rigged with explosives.
	They have tank-like vehicles known as monsters equipped with machine gun turrets and steel armor.
	But the widespread use of improvised landmines is new.
	Experts blame their rise, in part, on an influx into Mexico of mercenary fighters from Colombia where explosives played a central role in a long-running war between leftist guerrilla groups and far-right paramilitaries.
	Yeah, a literal war there in Mexico.
	And of course, the border wide open.
	What's to stop it from coming here?
	Well, nothing. They won't stop it.
	The Republicans won't stop it either.
	They want it. The Republicans and the Democrats want it.
	This is another area where there's no difference between these people.
	Oh, well, we're not going to give aid to Ukraine, says Mike Johnson.
	They become Speaker of the House. Well, we're going to give aid to Ukraine, but you're going to have to pony up a little bit of money to protect the border.
	Five months later, forget the border.
	All the money's going to Ukraine.
	That type of thing. So, the burning platform says, well, what would Josie Wales do?
	And he talks about the movie The Outlaw Josie Wells, one of my favorites.
	As a matter of fact, if you look at that picture, scroll that up so people can see the firearms there.
	Those are period piece accurate revolvers from Civil War.
	And anyway, a great film, a Clint Eastwood film.
	He says, Burning Platform says, well, it's easy to become apathetic and to surrender to hopelessness.
	There are relentless powerful forces actively trying to destroy the fabric of our society and force the masses into economic servitude while caged in an electronic gulag controlled by an oligarchy of evil totalitarian-minded billionaires and their lackeys in key governmental, political, banking, military, media, and corporate positions of power.
	Yeah, that pretty much sums it up.
	They want to imprison us in electronic gulag, be controlled by these billionaires, and the people that they control in government, in politics, in banking, the military, the media, and all the rest of this stuff.
	And he said, we're in the same situation as Josie Wells, and the outlaw Josie Wells.
	I'm afraid if we follow down this revenge path, we will be.
	Because, see, that was what Josie Wales is ultimately about.
	The movie begins as this one faction has come through and killed his family.
	And so then he joins with another faction and takes revenge on them.
	We don't fight for revenge.
	We shouldn't. We should fight for reform.
	And don't you find it amazing and alarming to That nobody, when they talk about what has happened to Trump, and again, I think that there's real crimes that have been created by Trump, so I have no sympathy for him in general.
	But the things that they've chosen to come after him for are not real crimes.
	And they're designed to push us into a civil war.
	And so what you see on the people, on the side of the people who support him, though, is not a cry for we need to reform the justice system.
	No, because they don't care about that for the little guy.
	So when this happens to the big guy, and they've ignored it all this time for the little guy, all they talk about is revenge.
	Revenge, not reform.
	You have to have a vision.
	In order to talk about reform.
	And the manga people don't have a vision.
	That's one of the things I said about the Tea Party thing.
	Taxed enough already?
	Okay, so what's the problem?
	Is the problem that we've got too much spending?
	Or is the problem that the government is doing too many things?
	Or is it just that they're doing it inefficiently?
	I mean, you don't even identify what the problem is.
	You said taxes are too high.
	We've got to do something about it.
	Well, what? They wouldn't even identify what the cause of it was.
	And if we want to talk about make America great again, that is also a label that absolutely says nothing about what the problem is.
	It doesn't address as to why America is no longer so great.
	What was great about America?
	Well, America was great because it was godly.
	America was blessed.
	It wasn't that we were great because we pulled ourselves up by our bootstraps.
	Again, our founders said that liberty was a blessing from God.
	Peace was a blessing from God.
	We used to be a country that minded its own business.
	We used to be a country that believed and don't initiate a war.
	But of course, that was before the Civil War.
	That was that America 1.0.
	And even it was not perfect.
	But... We need to ask, what is greatness?
	They don't define that. Just like the Tea Party didn't define what level of taxes and what is the role of government.
	There was no discussion about that.
	What does it mean to be great?
	You see? What does it mean to be great?
	Does that mean that we're the biggest kid on the block and we can kick anybody that we want around?
	That appears to be the kind of thuggish mafia approach that Don takes, Trump takes.
	But that's not greatness.
	If that's greatness, then we should celebrate all of the dictators of the world.
	We don't want to be a great dictator.
	We don't want to be the Roman Empire.
	And so they don't even address what values they want to elevate.
	And of course, they're not going to talk about reform because they don't share our values of liberty and peace.
	They've been pissing down our backs since the last Civil War, he writes, while telling us it's raining.
	That was one of my favorite lines from that movie.
	Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.
	I think, quite frankly, that pissing down your back and telling you that it's raining is exactly what they did during the pandemic, isn't it?
	They were the ones who were doing it.
	And they blamed it on COVID. They blamed it on the pandemic.
	They blamed it on China. They blamed it on the bio lab.
	They blamed it on everything. But they were the ones who were pissing down our back the entire time.
	And I will not give them an excuse to do it again.
	So, you know, when we look at...
	Where we move from here.
	This thing is hooked up here.
	The anger is not just in America, of course.
	It's everywhere. Because the world is in sync at this fourth turning.
	Everywhere we realize that the institutions have become corrupt, that they have failed, that they've even turned against us.
	The problem is that there's nobody offering any real solutions in many cases.
	Now there is a reform party In the UK, Nigel Farage is talking about this, and I'm not necessarily endorsing them, but of course we've had other people like Lawrence Fox, who was a reformed candidate, and he did address the issues, the fundamental issues that came about with the pandemic, the destruction of the rule of law and all the rest of the things that came with it.
	And they talked about how that needed to be reformed.
	Now, I don't know if Nigel Farage is going to focus in on that, and yet you see the anger directed at him.
	I just had a guy throwing cement at him on his campaign.
	He's on a double-decker bus on the upper level, and some guy who's very well-documented throwing rocks at him, cement rocks from a construction site.
	And it was only one man, but of course he just recently had some woman who was an OnlyFans prostitute, who I guess wanted attention for herself, and she threw a milkshake on him, and that's something that's been done in the past by many of them, looking for attention.
	And you know, he's got a very nice suit, and she destroyed it with a milkshake.
	And when that happened in the past...
	You had a so-called comedian back in 2019 on BBC Radio said, well, I'm thinking, why bother with a milkshake when you could just get some battery acid?
	As many people said, that went way beyond what was appropriate.
	And he said, well, I didn't mean for that to be taken seriously.
	And yet, you know, this guy's now throwing concrete at him.
	He said, in a country where politicians of both major parties have been murdered in recent years, Think about that.
	We haven't had any American politicians murdered.
	But there have been two murdered in the UK. Both Labour and Conservative politicians murdered.
	Murdered on both sides.
	There was Labour's Joe Cox, who was shot three times in 2016 in Gun Control UK. Then there was the Conservatives' David Amos, who was stabbed in 2021.
	These kinds of physical assaults, this person who is a writer for a conservative party writer, says, Every vote for Nigel Farage protest party is an act of national self-harm.
	Reform will reform nothing.
	Well, give them a chance, at least.
	I mean, certainly the conservatives have not reformed anything.
	Why would you keep on doing the same stuff that has failed all the time?
	What have conservatives done besides the self, you know, a vote for a third party as an act of self-harm because he says it's going to help the Labor Party to get into power.
	Well, I think the conservatives have been about self-harm throughout this pandemic and all the other policies that they have done.
	They've been 100% about self-harm.
	But he said, still, the bullying of Farage sickens me.
	And it should, but it is a harbinger of what people are capable of doing on both sides.
	When I say that everybody is upset about Trump and his Mar-a-Lago search warrant and all the rest of this stuff, and again, people say, look at this, they were going to try to kill him.
	It turns out that that was nonsense.
	Yes, there was no reason for them to go.
	Yes, there was a situation where the FBI and the Secret Service could come into conflict with each other.
	But it's not like the FBI didn't know that the Secret Service was going to be there.
	And I'm sure that they talked to each other.
	But the reality is that that is boilerplate language on every one of these FBI searches.
	It's boilerplate. We have raids all the time.
	SWAT team raids.
	Began in L.A. with Daryl Gates, and then the feds loved that idea, and they have pushed and rewarded police departments everywhere to have militarized SWAT attacks on houses.
	And these conservatives who are crying tears about what might have happened with Trump don't care a whit about what is happening, what is happening to all of us all the time.
	They're silent about it all the time.
	They don't care at all. And so here's another story of this.
	Now, this is in a different way, and I've seen several of these.
	This is not just a SWAT team raid or SWAT team raid on the wrong house and killing somebody.
	But this is a situation where they're in pursuit of a criminal, and the criminal goes into somebody's home or their business, and they destroy everything.
	And now there's going to be a court case about this because the governments always say, well, I'm not responsible for paying this.
	And insurance companies say, well, I'm not paying it.
	So this is something from the Daily Mail.
	My home was destroyed in a police raid, even though I had done nothing wrong.
	But it's what happened after that that should concern every homeowner.
	Carlos Pena had served the people of North Hollywood for 30 years, designing signs, banners, and clothing for grateful customers across the neighborhood.
	But on August 3, 2022, his humble print shop was decimated by a bombardment of grenades that tore through his walls, windows, and ceilings.
	The father of two had been caught in the middle of a police pursuit of a dangerous fugitive.
	Scroll down. They've got some pictures of the damage, even more so than that.
	I think there's pictures of, well, maybe not.
	This is another house there that they did something like that to.
	It had been caught in the middle of a police pursuit of a dangerous fugitive who had barricaded himself in his store.
	Now the unfortunate businessman has been left to shoulder the costs of $60,000 in repairs after insurers and the city refused to pay out.
	And he's not the only one, they point out.
	This is as unlucky as he is.
	American property owners are being caught in the crossfire of destructive SWAT raids every couple of weeks.
	Just months before Pina's store was raided, Amy Hadley had her home in South Bend, Indiana, razed to the ground by police in a desperate search for a murder suspect who was never even there.
	In August last year, Austin police caused $23,000 of damage to the home of Glenn and Mindy Shield, an innocent couple, after they busted the wrong property.
	Again, you know, going to the wrong place, thinking these people were involved in drugs, and many times killing people.
	And Molly Slayball was left with $70,000 of repairs after a SWAT team assaulted her home with dozens of tear gas canisters during a manhunt.
	Some of these properties should never have been raided.
	In other cases, there might have been a clear public interest in apprehending a dangerous criminal but none of it, but in none of it is it right that innocent bystanders should be left to pick up the tab.
	Officers say that they won't pay because the government did it and then the city authorities claim immunity from damages.
	But you know, weren't the Trump lockdowns and closings, weren't that kind of the same He destroyed people, but he didn't use the police SWAT teams to do it.
	You can destroy people with a pen as well, can't you?
	You can pay people to destroy people with a pen, too, can't you?
	All of that could change, however, if Vicki Baker wins a landmark case set to go before the Supreme Court in the fall.
	Her $300,000 property was destroyed in July 2020 after a SWAT team stormed her house, launching tear gas grenades through windows, knocking down doors, leveling a fence with an armored vehicle, in pursuit of a fugitive, Wesley Little.
	The 79-year-old had not even been living in the house in McKinney, Texas, but had spent a year fixing it up for sale.
	She had even found a buyer who unsurprisingly pulled out after the raid left the house in a mess.
	The suspect, the fugitive, killed himself in the master bedroom.
	Bye.
	She lives in Montana, and she remembers one of her first conversations with a city official who told her she, quote, wouldn't see a dime if she tried to claim compensation.
	Those words are still ringing in her ears on January 22, 2022, when a federal jury ruled that she was entitled to $60,000 in damages.
	And it came after a U.S. District Court judge rejected the city's argument that the police action should be exempt from the requirement that the government pay for the property it destroys.
	And so it says that everybody agrees that the government has to pay for property that it takes.
	But throughout most of the country, they say this doesn't apply to the police.
	She was able to win in Texas because it's one of only two states, Minnesota and Texas, that say this kind of damage is compensable.
	So the fact that these states have had these rulings on their books for decades and they can afford to pay them is an argument for why this ought to be applied everywhere.
	But it is not. And getting back to this guy that began the story, Pina, he's been forced to work out of his garage.
	He's lost $120,000 worth of revenue.
	He's in the process of trying to sell his home.
	And earlier in the year, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ruled that he was not entitled to compensation.
	This is the case that they're going to appeal before the Supreme Court.
	So talk to me about Mar-a-Lago.
	I don't care about Mar-a-Lago.
	Trump doesn't care about any of these people.
	Doesn't now. Didn't then.
	It's not worth having a civil war over.
	We'll be right back.
	♪♪
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Bye.
	Narrow Way, Narrow Gate Ministries says all these people who have been frothing at the mouth over civil war have no idea what they're asking for.
	Yeah, that's what I've said. You know, it's the most naive thing, and yet we see this throughout history as every war is beginning.
	He said it won't be a video game.
	It'll be horrible, bloody, and in everyone's streets.
	It's not simple as north and south like it was in 1865, 61, 65.
	Nothing new under the sun. Well, you know, back then, everybody thought it was going to be simple, and it wound up back then, being in everybody's streets.
	Certainly, if you were in the south, Sherman burned his way across the south.
	And so it was not just the massive slaughter.
	When you look at the number of people who died, and of course those casualty figures are rigged.
	Don't tell me that exactly the same number of people died north and south.
	I don't for a minute believe that.
	Oh yeah, the official story is that 300,000 northern troops died and 300,000 southerners died.
	You know, that's propaganda, right?
	No talk about how many civilians were killed either, but that's absolute propaganda.
	But even if that were true, if you normalize it over the population, the then population of the South, you're talking about like 25 million people today, right?
	Such a small population to have 300,000 people killed?
	If you had that same type of war that you did in the South?
	And that's just the military.
	It's not even including the civilian casualties.
	Weapons of destruction are far more now than they were then.
	However, if you've got 20,000 people firing.50 caliber bullets in a wave, that's pretty destructive.
	And pretty much takes everything out.
	Tremendous amount of firepower that was involved in that.
	Tremendous number of casualties.
	And yet at the beginning of the Civil War, all these people showed up to the first battle.
	The first battle of Bull Run or the first battle of Manassas.
	They even had different names for that battle north and south.
	People showed up like it was going to be a picnic.
	They brought picnic lunches.
	They were going to watch this thing happen.
	They had no idea how bloody that was going to be.
	Interesting, they had a second battle there at that field.
	The person on that farm said, no, that's it.
	I'm getting out of here, you know.
	And so that person moved to Appomattox, and it was then on their farm that Lee and Grant met, and they signed the paperwork there.
	Civil War began and ended on this one person's farm.
	Stuff like that throughout the Civil War truly is amazing to read the history of it, but it is unbelievably naive to think that this is going to be a piece of cake.
	People look at it as, oh yeah, those lefties, they can't do anything.
	I've got another comment here from Owen 61.
	It says, Farage wasn't the first one to take a cement milkshake.
	Ask Andy Ngo about his interaction with Portland Antifa about four years ago.
	Yeah, they can be very dangerous.
	And they connected with him, unlike with Farage.
	You know, they connected with the milkshake.
	They didn't connect with the cement.
	But they did brutally attack Andy.
	Well, let's see.
	One more comment here. Dragon...
	Dragon Agrita, Trump gave the cops all kinds of weapons to use against us.
	That's right. He paid for it all, as they always do.
	Biden is going to be coming for light bulbs again.
	See, first they come...
	First, they came for the incandescent light, and I did nothing because I didn't like incandescent lights.
	And then they came for the compact fluorescence, and I did nothing because I had compact fluorescence.
	Then they're going to come for the LEDs, right?
	When are we going to do something? Pastor Martin Niemuller, right?
	Niemuller, I forget the pronunciation.
	I had a descendant of his who was a listener to the show and corrected me.
	Now I forget which one. Second guess.
	Anyway, Biden, something of a dim bulb himself, is now coming for LEDs.
	He says that they are not bright enough from the guy who is notorious for not being bright.
	We're going to do this chaos from the inside, and we're going to do it iteratively.
	We'll come after the incandescent bulbs, and we'll come after the compact fluorescence, then we'll come after the LEDs.
	Well, what do they want next? Well, they're demanding that they have to make more efficient LEDs.
	It's just not enough. Not enough to have a light bulb that only uses six watts or whatever.
	So they're going to have to do something that they said they don't have any idea what to do just yet.
	You see, they're talking about their zero stuff, right?
	We have all these different net zero, and we have zero COVID. Everything is always zero, isn't it?
	Vision zero. We're going to have zero pedestrian casualties from cars, which means that you're going to have zero cars.
	Everything's got to go to zero, right?
	These people want us to have nothing.
	I think we need to stop calling them climate alarmists and we need to start calling them climate nihilists because that's what they're really pushing.
	They're pushing nihilism more than they're pushing alarmism.
	Alarmism is what they do to produce fear.
	But nihilism, nihilism is the goal of these people.
	Understand that nihilism is about negating knowledge.
	It's about negating morality.
	Nihilism is about negating that there's any meaning to life.
	And isn't that what you see from these radical climate people out there?
	You know, they just want to destroy everything.
	They want to destroy art.
	They want to destroy, you know, they attach themselves to stuff.
	They want to destroy everything in our lives.
	They truly are nihilists.
	And it is a kind of pessimism.
	And it condemns our very existence.
	It offers nothing in return.
	Zero, zip, nada.
	And everything they say is about zero this, zero that.
	We've got to have zero carbon.
	We've got to have zero COVID. And when you take that kind of absolutist approach, which is what is evident here in this, now we've got to ban LED light bulbs.
	When they take this kind of approach to everything, they just want to burn it down.
	And they will never be satisfied with this.
	Never be satisfied.
	They will always dictate the next thing.
	One person said, you know, if you use their pronouns, for example, they don't care about you using their pronouns.
	This is the tactic to dominate you.
	And so if you use their pronouns, they'll just come back and say, okay, now I want you to do this.
	This is a game of Simon Says.
	You just do everything that they say.
	You wear the mask? Oh, well, now you've got to wear two masks.
	Maybe three masks. Who knows?
	So, we look where this is coming from.
	It's coming from the Department of Energy.
	This is another one of the Carter creations.
	He created the Department of Energy, 1977.
	He created the Department of Education, 1982.
	Departments that have been just a vexation on America, haven't they?
	The Department of Energy. And you keep having all these Republicans say, well, I'm going to get rid of some of these useless departments.
	You know, we're able to go for, you know, a couple hundred years to the Department of Energy.
	Why do we need it now? It's just there to destroy things in our life, just like Nixon's EPA is there to destroy and ban things.
	They don't produce anything.
	What they do is they destroy.
	They're destructive. And Republicans understand that.
	They always promise to get rid of this.
	Remember Rick Perry. I'm going to get rid of three departments.
	I'm going to get rid of the Department of Education and the Department of Commerce or something.
	And he says, and then there's the third department.
	What is that? I can't remember where that is.
	And he said, Department of Energy.
	Yeah, that's it. Department of Energy.
	I'm going to get rid of the Department of Energy.
	And when Trump becomes president, Trump appoints Rick Perry as head of the Department of Energy.
	And he accepts it. He accepts it.
	Maybe it was a Trump joke, but the real joke is on you.
	The joke that's on you is the Department of Energy that is pushing through all of these mandates and these dictates.
	And so the Department of Energy announced that beginning in July of 2028...
	Four years from now, LED bulbs will have to have nearly triple the lumens that they must achieve per watt from the current 45 lumens to 120 lumens.
	Or think about it in another way, for the same brightness, it's going to use one-third the amount of energy.
	Officials of the Department of Energy said the move will save energy and reduce the nation's carbon emissions.
	Again, this is this insane, it's like the insane zero COVID that destroyed these cities in China.
	It's destroyed their economy, destroyed our economy.
	The lockdown until we don't have any cases anymore.
	Well, you know, what is a case?
	Is that anybody that's sick even?
	No, it's not. It's your artificial rigged way of measuring this stuff, just like they've got an artificial rigged way of measuring temperature, of measuring CO2, of attributing it to the wrong factors.
	Nothing about this stuff makes any sense, whether you're talking about climate or COVID. And so we've got to have zero CO2 now, instead of zero COVID. Just pick something.
	It doesn't have to be dangerous.
	It's just got to be ubiquitous.
	You pick that, and then you keep telling people, regardless of the fact that you don't have any science to back it up, you pay some scientists who want grants, and they will say what you want to say.
	And you'll tell everybody that this thing that is ubiquitous is everywhere, like CO2. It's got to be eliminated.
	Got to be eliminated. Or like the cold or the flu.
	Got to be eliminated. And we got to...
	Everything must be destroyed in order to eliminate this.
	This is what we're seeing, like with a bird flu.
	You come in and you say, well, I tested one chicken and I got a positive PCR test.
	I got a positive PCR process.
	I've got not just the quantitative PCR that was magnifying stuff by 1.1 trillion times, but now I've got something even more capable of higher magnification.
	The digital PCR. So we got one chicken here and we found some of this stuff that's just floating around.
	Doesn't mean that they were sick.
	Doesn't mean that they had enough of it that they could be sick.
	Doesn't mean they had enough of it that they could pass it on to somebody.
	We had this trice, minuscule amount.
	Let's kill all the chickens on this farm.
	Let's kill all the cattle on this farm.
	Doesn't have to be anybody that's sick.
	And ask yourself, why is that a solution?
	How in the world does that make sense?
	Is that as idiotic As the mask, as the lockdowns, as all the six-foot social distancing.
	Isn't that stupid? I mean, you could quarantine that herd and watch it, couldn't you?
	Oh, but they're not going to do that.
	No, got to kill all the cows and leave them out in an open field.
	Dead. All the chickens.
	Kill all the chickens and then we shoot them up into, as I showed you the pictures last week, shoot them up into big trucks to carry them off and drive them down the road.
	You could quarantine them there.
	Again, not even one sick animal, but you got a PCR result.
	So you kill all the animals.
	How in the world does that make any sense?
	You're saying this is such a dangerous thing, it's going to kill all the animals?
	Well, let's see what happens.
	Let's do a test case.
	Instead of killing an entire flock, let's quarantine the entire flock.
	And then, if they don't die, we've got nothing to worry about.
	But see, the thing that we have to worry about is the government that does these things.
	The government that does six-foot distancing.
	The government that kills all the animals on a farm over a flawed, false test.
	So, they have to take our life, our liberty, our property, everything, to get to their nihilistic conclusion.
	Because that's what this is always about.
	Whenever you hear these people talk zero, think nihilism, because that's what it is.
	No meaning, no life.
	That's what these people want.
	Well, we have, in their endless quest, To find a way to keep this going, the officials of the Department of Energy have said that this move will save energy and reduce the nation's carbon emissions by the people who make light bulbs, unlike the dim bulb in the White House or these dim bulbs at the Department of Energy.
	Jennifer Granholm, she didn't know how to make a light bulb.
	She has absolutely no idea how it's going to be, but she dictates that everybody's going to make their LEDs four times more efficient.
	The DOE calculates that over 30 years, the more stringent LED standards will save Americans $27 billion on their utility bills and slash 70 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions.
	Well, again, we could save even more than that if we just ban all light bulbs completely, which is where they'll eventually go.
	It is a new dark age.
	And they have no idea how to do it.
	They have no idea and they don't care what the cost is going to be.
	No cost is too great for us to get to zero.
	Well, it just never ends.
	And yet the reality is that none of this is real.
	And we need to confront the lies about all this and the tactics of which they use.
	Now, this is kind of interesting.
	As we have Gates pushing lab meat and synthetic meat, this is actually a story that was put out by the New York Post.
	Vegan fake meats are linked to heart disease and to early death.
	Now, they're talking about ultra-processed vegan food.
	And of course, when you do a lot of ultra-processing, you're using industrial chemicals, you're using additives and all kinds of things like that.
	So that's not surprising.
	The Imperial College of London had said that, so this may be total nonsense because of the people that were pushing this COVID stuff, but they're talking about how a plant-based eating plan promotes overall heart health, but only when it's real food.
	I wonder how much they got paid for that.
	Yeah, also it's made of soy, says my son.
	Yeah, that's right. Disrupt your hormones if you're male.
	I wonder how much they got paid to give you that common sense conclusion there.
	Researchers found, and here we go, here's their dietary calculations.
	This is what you can take with a grain of salt.
	These are the same people who came up with the numbers of how many people were going to die from COVID They said for every 10% increase in plant-based foods the risk of death from heart disease fell by 20% yet When the plant-based foods came from ultra processed foods It was linked to a 12% rise in the heart disease related deaths Who knew?
	Who knew because of all of the you know, you package the stuff you make little veggie french fries or something like that out of it Study found that replacing plant-based things with whole foods is known to have an important health report.
	But what they're not talking about, which I find interesting, is, well, what about, you know, when we eat tumors?
	Because that's what this lab meat really is.
	You know, what if I have a tumor T-bone?
	This eternal cell line that's just going to keep replicating.
	It's a tumor. It's a cancer. So you're going to eat some cancer tumors?
	You're going to call it a T-bone steak?
	No, it's a tumor.
	It's a short thing I would say.
	So what do you think that's going to be?
	You talk about something that's ultra-processed.
	How about a tumor T-bone?
	And all this is fake.
	There's a great article on Daily Skeptic.
	The climate emergency is a myth, says Nobel Prize winner John Clouser.
	And here's why he is right.
	This is a very long article.
	I would suggest if you're interested in this, want to educate yourself on it, take a look at it.
	But here's the high points of it.
	First of all, he won his Nobel Prize.
	By observing the measurement of quantum entanglement.
	So, as Daily Skeptic points out, he really does understand the problem of distinguishing a physical signal from background noise.
	And what he said was that the UN's IPCC, that's the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, these are the people who are pushing this climate nihilism from the UN. He said their models, their analyses are relied upon by politicians and activists to support claims of climate crisis, but they do not meet even basic standards of scientific inquiry.
	And he knows, because that's what he got his Nobel Prize in.
	He shows that when corrected for the IPCC's error-prone arithmetic and statistics, they don't even get the math right, just like the Imperial College of London.
	You know, as the University of Edinburgh pointed out, it said...
	You run their simulation from the Apparel College of London.
	Every time you run it, even with the same input, you get a different answer.
	It's garbage.
	And the model that it was based on was garbage.
	But the implementation was garbage.
	Same thing with the IPCC. Their arithmetic and stats are not even right.
	He said the observational data do not support the power imbalance.
	Claim to be responsible for global warming.
	And that's if you can get the observational data from them.
	They are manic about hiding it, which is a big tell, isn't it?
	The climate models, he said, are at variance.
	In other words, they completely disagree with the observational record.
	And we've pointed out that, you know, since the 1960s, these people...
	Dire predictions about climate have all proven wrong.
	Clouser discusses, and one way of saying it is that their predictions are at variance with our observations.
	That's Nobel Prize speak.
	That's the way those people talk.
	He discusses the roles of convection of clouds, of their variability, and providing negative feedback mechanism.
	He proposes that this acts as a thermostat.
	To stabilize surface temperatures.
	Fowler's conclusion is the claims of a climate crisis lack scientific substance.
	That net zero policies are an unnecessary hindrance.
	I wonder if Biden understands any of this stuff.
	You think? No. Does Gates care even if he understands it?
	Look, when he talks about the fact that there is a negative feedback mechanism, And we all see that.
	This is more evidence, folks, of design, which is evidence of God.
	God stands in, and his creation, stands in direct denial of their climate models.
	God set up clouds to help cool off the earth, and just as we have carbon dioxide, which is put out by animals and consumed by plants and so forth, there is a feedback mechanism that controls this.
	It keeps it in equilibrium.
	More evidence of a designer, God.
	And more evidence of a lying bureaucracy that is trying to take everything from us that thinks that they are God.
	So the Daily Skeptic's got the details.
	If you want a technical summary of what he does, they've got it.
	They've also got a link to a one-hour video, that presentation that he gave.
	But here's the conclusion. In conclusion, Clauser argues that the negative feedback mechanism in the Earth's climate system stabilizes temperatures against warming due to increases in radiative forcing.
	In other words, God's control feedback system.
	There is no CO2-induced man-made global warming climate crisis.
	The negative feedbacks similarly serve to stabilize surface temperatures against cooling.
	Such a thermostatic mechanism that draws on the thermodynamic properties of water explain how a water-rich planet, such as the Earth, has been hospitable to life throughout history because it was designed that way by God.
	The climate narrative promulgated by the IPCC and its advocates is based on poor statistics, flawed cherry-picking of data, incomplete treatment of physical mechanisms, and ignoring important negative feedbacks.
	And again, it's the poor statistics, the cherry-picking of data and all the rest of this stuff, and the hiding of data.
	And I saw it 15 years ago when I was with that group, and we're trying to get that information from Michael Mann, the guy who successfully so far sued Mark Stein.
	Michael Mann created the hockey stick thing, which is now at variance with observation.
	But yet, even though he did all this stuff, the flawed cherry picking, he was involved in ClimateGate and all the rest of this.
	We've seen these people saying, well, our models don't work.
	How do we cover this up?
	How do we hide the fact that the temperature has declined?
	How do we hide the fact that it's done exactly the opposite of what we predicted?
	Well, you hide it by using lawfare.
	That's the ultimate answer.
	And then we talk about the cherry picking of data.
	You know, it really is, as they say in this, the physics explanation of the Earth's observed historic warming and cooling cycles since the 1970s.
	You got to look at variability that's been induced by many other natural mechanisms discussed in the climate literature.
	Things like solar cycles.
	Orbital lunar cycles, cloud variability, ocean cycles, volcanoes, ozone variability.
	None of these things are in their models.
	I mean, they're just focused on CO2 stuff, right?
	Why? Well, because they can't control any of these things.
	These are all natural. And then when you look at the urban heat island effect, which is huge, this is what is completely corrupted the They're modern data that they've been collecting for the last hundred or so years.
	And prior to that, they kind of are debunked.
	But the urban heat islands that are happening has completely contaminated their data.
	They don't want anybody to see any of this.
	And one more, Professor Murray Salbi.
	Who died in 2022, but back in 2016.
	This is one from Exposé News, and they have a link to his lecture that he gave in 2016 at University College of London.
	He said, the effect of fossil fuel on CO2 emissions is minute, he said.
	The fossil fuel perturbation is too small to even be detectable.
	It is presently not detectable, and it will not be detectable ever, he said.
	CO2 is 0.4% of the atmosphere.
	Man-made CO2 is 3%.
	So the effect, he's right, the effect of fossil fuels on CO2 emissions is minute, non-observable, and will never be observable.
	And yet, since science has been taken over by government bureaucracies under the aegis of the UN, they use the same model that they have been using for public health dictatorship.
	When you think about the fact that CO2, as small as it is, 0.04%, imagine the absurdity of this narrative.
	And imagine the fact that of that 0.04%, That 97% of it is not under our control, and yet they want to take everything from us.
	What an amazing lie, but no more of a lie than what we see from the bird flu stuff, quite frankly.
	It's amazing what these people can get away with, and the key to getting away with it is controlling the media.
	Make sure that people don't see the messages that they need to see.
	Frieden said the climatologists quote-unquote only get paid if they can get the evidence of the position of the affirmative.
	That's how they get their grants. They get a grant by doing the propaganda that they want.
	So they fake it and they get their work peer-reviewed by their cohorts to present non-fraud appearance.
	But it is fraud. Jason Barker.
	Good to see you, Jason. Wait until we have one positive test in a 15-minute city and all the people on a certain block will have to be called.
	Yeah, that's right. It is truly insane.
	I mean, we've got to push back against this directly.
	And it's fine to talk about the hypocrisy of these people who say that we can't have plane flights, but then they fly around the world all the time in their private jets.
	It's fine to talk about the hypocrisy, but never just talk about the hypocrisy.
	We've always got to focus on the fundamental underlying lie that is there.
	So I'm going to take a quick break and when we come back, I want to talk a little bit about some of the, I've gotten behind in terms of talking about some of the letters that people have sent.
	We got some great letters.
	I talked about emails earlier.
	So we're gonna take a quick break and we will be right back
	Music playing...
	Analyzing the Globalist's next move Music playing...
	you you And now, the David Nutt Show.
	We do not throw away the cards and the letters that we get.
	We actually save them. And as we were moving these the other day, This particular one fell out.
	This is from a long-time supporter, Sue.
	And it was from the 4th of September, 2021.
	She said, faithfully every day I listen to you what a blessing you are to me and my mom. At the writing of this letter I do not know if I will still have a job as a nurse. I'm awaiting my religious exemption from these tyrants. I know that God will be there for me whatever the outcome. And so again, you know, said sorry for the small check.
	We'll send more next time.
	And she has been a faithful supporter this entire time.
	And when I saw that, I thought, you know, that is a key thing.
	We have to hang in this thing for the long term.
	And we have to have a vision for of why we are doing this resistance.
	If you're doing this because of religious exemption, because of your following God, God will honor that.
	One way or the other.
	Even if you wind up in abject poverty.
	And we must never lose sight of that.
	In retrospect, I have seen so many people who have lost their jobs and found something better.
	I've also seen people who complied in order to keep their job And they were disabled and never able to work again.
	Even people like the orthopedic surgeon I talk about so many times.
	He can't do that important work, that lucrative work, because he took the vaccine to comply.
	So, again, our actions have consequences for us.
	The actions have consequences for our society.
	We need to stand firm on these principles.
	And if we do, our liberty comes from God.
	Our provisions come from God.
	And we need to understand that.
	This is a new letter.
	That's an old one from 2021, nearly three years ago.
	This one says, I am...
	Totally appreciating you revisiting reports and analyses of the pandemic, because I had made a comment, I guess, I said, yeah, I keep going back over this stuff again, and I hope it's not getting tiresome, but we need to remember where this came from.
	This is Stacy.
	He says, Trump, as a useful idiot to useful idiots, as well as to Palantir.
	Some of my family members and friends are now listening, and they need to hear the truthful history, so please keep it up.
	Well, thank you. And we will keep reminding people of how we got to this point.
	How did we get the commercial real estate debacle that is then going to roll on to the banking industry and destroy small and local banks so we can have bank consolidation?
	Well, I don't know. Now we've only got the too-big-to-fail banks, and they're going to work with the government to do CBDC. I mean, it's how this stuff always plays out.
	By the way, didn't get into money today and didn't get into what is happening with finances.
	But again, you know, we talk about there's certain things that are 100% under your control.
	Some things you got a little bit of control over.
	But one thing that you can do, if you're worried about CVDC and some of these levers that they're going to push on you, economics, make sure that you have a way to get outside of the system.
	And that doesn't just mean cash.
	Cash is an important thing to have that financial transactional privacy that Katherine Austin Fitz always talks about.
	But gold is also a very important way to do it.
	Because gold can retain its value over a long period of time with inflation.
	It's not necessarily that you're going to get rich by investing in gold.
	Gold is not something like Bitcoin that people are looking at to say, well, it's going to be worth five times more in a couple of years than it is now.
	Gold will go up because the value of the dollar is going down.
	It maintains its value and has over centuries if we look at Bitcoin.
	What is happening with it. It's just a way to get outside of their system to maintain the value of your money instead of watching it evaporate.
	You look at what's been done with the Federal Reserve over the last 100 years.
	Over 99% of the values disappeared.
	It's purchasing power, but not so with gold.
	And so you want to be able to preserve the purchasing power of what you have.
	You're not trying to get rich quick.
	You're trying to preserve that purchasing power.
	So it should be an important part of your investment strategy, but also this new challenge to your liberty, to your privacy.
	To be able to have something that is going to preserve its value and it's going to be outside of their system.
	If you save a bunch of cash to say outside of the system, the value of that cash could go to zero very easily.
	That fiat currency, but not so with gold.
	So if you want to make that move, if you want to try to preserve some of that, davidknight.gold will take you to Tony Arterman's Wise Wolf Gold.
	I've known Tony a long time, dealt with Tony myself, and he will work with you for small or large purchases as well as a club that he has set up.
	The Wolf Pack to allow you to make purchases on a monthly basis.
	Just set aside a little bit each month.
	And as a member of that club, which now has over 1,000 people in it, it helps you to get a group discount on those things and to save money on some of that.
	So if you go to davidknight.gold, Tony has always been a kind supporter of this program.
	This comment is from another long-term supporter, Marty.
	Who says, thank you once again for your news and analysis.
	He says, FYI, lately I've been watching daily live on Odyssey and Catch the Mist segments on Rumble.
	And he says, oh, and one more thing.
	Trump's phony image must be destroyed.
	Yeah, that's a thing to say always.
	And one more thing, judicial supremacy must be destroyed, hearkening back to what Cato said about Carthage.
	And it is true.
	There's these persistent things that must be dismantled and must be destroyed.
	So... Thank you, all of you, for your kind support.
	By the way, Aaron, we're going to forward that letter that you did for Guard.
	We'll make sure. He sent Guard Goldsmith, Liberty Conspiracy.
	We have a letter from Aaron, and we're going to ask if we could forward that to you because he didn't have your address.
	So we'll make sure we get that out to you.
	Even put stamps on it even.
	So we'll make sure that you get that.
	And just wanted Aaron to know that we did get that as well.
	Amerigon says, Cows and basically every creature on the planet has been farting since creation.
	If you think facts are destroying the atmosphere and not NASA's rocket ships or atomic bombs or the massive amount of military flights that are going on all the time, Well, then you are delusional.
	That's absolutely right.
	As a matter of fact, last week, you know, we talked about the anniversary of the Normandy invasion, D-Day.
	This headline from WND, Google Snubs Normandy Heroes.
	Doesn't even talk about it. Instead, what it does is it celebrates a lesbian writer.
	Yeah. You know, Spielberg helped Biden.
	He took him to the same place, that Pointe du Hoc that I talked about.
	I read that long. A story about the rangers who climbed up that sheer cliff of sand and loose rock, 90 feet high, while they were being shot at from above, because that was the most accessible way to get to Point Duhok, which was heavily fortified.
	They made it, even though they suffered 60% casualties, and they destroyed that threat to the invading...
	People at Normandy. And so Reagan went there and made his speech there in 1984.
	Biden went to the same place.
	But Biden, I've seen Reagan and you're no Reagan.
	You know, Reagan could read a good speech.
	He had good speech writers.
	Biden doesn't. Reagan was a pretty good actor.
	Biden is a horrible actor.
	He can't read the prepared speeches, and he doesn't have anybody to prepare the speeches.
	So even though he's got Spielberg there pushing it, because Spielberg did saving Private Ryan, I guess what he was trying to do was to save Biden's privates this time, but didn't do too good a job.
	But instead of acknowledging and honoring the 160,000 soldiers who stormed the beaches of Normandy, Google decided to celebrate a female writer, a lesbian author, and activist on their main page because, again, that's what they're all about.
	They're all about moving an agenda.
	One World War II vet said, I feel like a foreigner in my own country because, guess what?
	He's not celebrated, but a lesbian author is.
	And these people are looking at this stuff and saying, what was I even fighting for?
	The real truth?
	Yeah. I feel like a foreigner in my own country lots of times, and I don't like it.
	It makes my heart real heavy.
	And I just hope when you pull out of this, there's too much...
	Too much Hollywood going on in Washington all the time.
	The important subjects they don't cover.
	So the thing is, I hope all the guys will rally up and we'll go back and straighten it all out.
	Yeah, too much Hollywood.
	That's what it is. It's all about a TV reality show.
	He absolutely understands it.
	He was 97 years old.
	He lied about his age to get at it.
	That's the real Captain America right there.
	He lied about his age to get in, and a war hero there.
	We've got another clip I'll play for you tomorrow.
	It's a World War II veteran, and he said, it just ruined everything.
	And we can't let them ruin everything.
	We have to reestablish that positive vision.
	Thank you for joining us.
	Have a good day.
	The common man.
	I'm dying.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.

▲