Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 21, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:58

The David Knight Show - 05/21/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Bye.
	Using free speech to free minds.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	At the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday the 21st of May, Year of Our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to talk about Elon Musk, an mRNA factory, a CureVac.
	I've talked about this before, but there's been a deep dive into it.
	And it also involves censorship as well.
	Yeah, he is right at the heart of all of the technocracy, including the mRNA stuff.
	And we have massive scandal in the UK with blood deaths.
	This one is not associated with the vaccine, but it shows us how corrupt the system has been for decades.
	It goes back to the 90s, and it's just now coming out.
	Imagine what they're going to say about the time that we're living in right now in a few decades.
	And we're going to take a look at the Rube Goldberg Pier in Israel.
	One of the most ridiculous political quote-unquote solutions you've ever seen in your life.
	We'll be right back. Music I want to begin today with pharmaceutical stuff, because I did not get to that yesterday, and I had a lot of things to talk about.
	As a matter of fact, Charlie with APS Radio said, you know, I sent this to my doctor because he accused me of being a Luddite because I didn't want to get an untested vaccine, that type of thing.
	And he said, when you look at what is going on with Trump, he said he agrees that Trump has been very divisive and perhaps pushed into office for being that way.
	He says, take a look at the masks and the lockdowns.
	Instead of the left and the right uniting for defense of civil liberties, He caused the left to associate opposition to mask rules and lockdowns with support of himself.
	And part of this is the fact that everything has been made political.
	Everything has been made partisan.
	If you look at the two-party system, It is a perfect model for the Hegelian dialectic.
	And this is the way they move it.
	And so, as we saw through this, and of course Trump was a big part of this.
	He was key. As I've said many times, he is the dividing point.
	You know, people in support of him, people in opposition to him.
	People in opposition to him truly are delusional in terms of their outrage and their hatred for the man.
	And the people who support him are truly deceived in terms of who they think this guy is.
	It truly is amazing.
	A strong delusion is upon them.
	So we have the people who support him under a strong delusion.
	The people who oppose him, completely deranged.
	And of course, because of their political position, they're instinctively set up to push for safety over liberty.
	They don't care about liberty.
	They don't want liberty.
	The other thing is, they don't like business.
	As I've said many times, you want to look at conservatives versus liberals, but especially with the libertarians who are more conservative on economic issues than the conservatives are really, more free market.
	And the libertarians will say, well, you know, government can do nothing right, business can do nothing wrong.
	The liberals will say just the opposite, that government can do no wrong, and that business can do nothing right.
	And the reality that they miss is that they are unified in all of this.
	But there is a predisposition for people who like free market economics to look at successful people.
	How they measure success by their net worth is how they measure it.
	Not how I measure it.
	It's, yeah, it's, we were talking about that just the other day.
	Somebody was talking about, when you meet people in a large group, they always want to, oh, what, you know, another guy, what do you do for a living, you know?
	And when I had, when I chained a video store, I would just tell them, why just work in a video store?
	Because I didn't want to play that game.
	Yeah, I'm just a video store clerk.
	I don't say clerk, because I'd be lying.
	I just work in a video store.
	Oh, okay. Now they're satisfied.
	They are bigger than me, and we can talk about something else.
	Anyway, when you look at the people who are pushing, a lot of people hate somebody because they're successful.
	They hate businessmen, right?
	That's the left. The right instinctively wants to support them, especially if they're perceived as being successful because of their net worth.
	And so they play into this as well.
	And as we'll see today, Trump is not really, he's not a successful businessman.
	He's a successful BS-er, pure Bolshevik, but he's not very successful in terms of business.
	It's unbelievable, the failures.
	Six failed casinos.
	He lost 300 and something million dollars off of revenue of $770,000 with his Trump media stuff.
	How do you do that? Well, you do that with Wall Street.
	You do that with the greater fool thing, right?
	Same way that he is succeeding in politics with the greater fool thing.
	But, you know, they used that because they knew that the left would instinctively want to do something that's going to make them safe.
	And they wouldn't care about the lockdowns and all that.
	But Trump was there to nudge the conservatives along that way.
	And he was also there as the dividing line for civil war.
	As Charlie writes, he caused the left to embrace the mRNA vaccine.
	Anybody who opposed the vaccine was of necessity.
	A supporter of Trump.
	Remember, it was the other way around.
	Oh, don't take that Trump vaccine.
	But as soon as Biden got left, oh, it's good.
	And they were ready to roll it out.
	60 Minutes had the piece in the can.
	And they said, oh, it's all been approved now.
	It's all got emergency use authorization.
	So he said he's doing research for this.
	He said it was kind of interesting. Go back and look in 2019.
	The people who were opposed to vaccines were typically older and better educated, higher income, affluent.
	And that's what we saw, especially in California.
	It's one of the reasons why they doubled down so hard in California to mandate vaccines.
	Because a lot of people out there, affluent people who did the research, didn't want it.
	So they pushed down really hard.
	With the mandates there.
	Gotta get it. It's really going around.
	You know, that stuff. Measles to prepare the way.
	But it reversed during 2021.
	He said there's a Tufts University survey.
	Those who are opposed to COVID vaccine tended to be younger, less educated, and more likely to be a supporter of Trump.
	Isn't that interesting? Again, the road to hell is paved with the Hegelian dialectic.
	It is a two-step process.
	They need to have two parties, only two parties.
	It doesn't work if you've got thesis, antithesis, and synthesis is going to be what you come out with.
	No, no, it doesn't work if you've got another wing in there.
	As a matter of fact, the EU has learned that.
	The EU is shutting down populist parties from being in debates.
	Yeah, well, where have we seen that before?
	I've seen it all my life.
	Well, all my life in politics, you know, going back 35, 40 years.
	But the reality is that that's how they rig the elections, primarily.
	Ballot access, debate access, and you see that being done in the EU. Now, we've moved on with Trump.
	We've got a new method here.
	We call it reality TV. And in reality TV, we have these show trials.
	And the momentum goes back and forth.
	But actually, show trials have been good for both sides.
	But it looks like it's about to blow up in Biden's face with Michael Cohen.
	We've got a clip of Anderson Cooper who is just...
	I love this clip.
	Not because of what it tells us about Trump with a trial or anything else, but because of what it tells us about Anderson Cooper.
	He's live and he's looking at this...
	Michael Cohen lying, and he's trying to think what to say to not alienate his base, because his base wants to push Cohen, he's the hero, and all the rest of the stuff.
	And he can't avoid saying that he lied, but he says, well, I'm sure he told the truth about other stuff, you know, that type of thing.
	It is easy. It's interesting to watch people like Anderson Cooper squirm to try to defend the prosecution of Trump, just like it's interesting to watch people like Alex Jones squirm to try to promote him and promote his vaccine as sugar water,
	stuff like that. I mean, it Makes you angry, but nobody's going to die from what Anderson Cooper said, but people who listen to Alex Jones and take the sugar water.
	Yeah, it's just sugar water. You can take it.
	Come on. He's made it harmless.
	The Trump vaccine is good.
	Yeah. That's what we're really talking about here.
	So he said, I hope someday people will look back and they'll understand what the lockdowns and the mask rules are really about.
	I believe historians will write this period off as authoritarian and backward in a number of respects.
	Well, that's absolutely right.
	As a matter of fact, you know, when you go back and you look at it, people are going to, future generations, are going to look at what happened.
	And this is why I want to be loud and clear.
	I never had a part in it.
	I was never, I imagine most of you were not either.
	But we're going to go back and look at the circles of people standing apart from each other in the open fields.
	The stuff that was put down on the grocery stores where you had to go in one entrance and you had to follow in one direction and all the rest of this stuff.
	And the masks.
	All of these superstitions.
	Step on a crack. You break your mother's back.
	That kind of stuff. It's juvenile beyond belief.
	Idiotic beyond belief.
	Don't anybody, I hope none of these people ever laugh at medieval superstitions about disease.
	Because they are wide open to this stuff.
	It was superstition.
	It was not science. It was superstition and fear.
	Not science. And so I want to talk in this context, not so much about Trump, as about Elon Musk.
	You know, when you look at Elon Musk, this is another billionaire that the right loves to get behind.
	They love to trust and they want to love people who they perceive as being successful in business.
	But folks, the first time I ever interviewed Eric Peters, it was over a column that he had at ericpetersautos.com talking about Elon Musk being the king of crony capitalism.
	Crony capitalism is not free market.
	Crony capitalism, folks, is the equivalent of a guy competing in women's sports, okay?
	That's what it's really about.
	If you want an analogy, it's about a tranny who defeats all the women in wrestling or whatever, and that's what Elon Musk is.
	He's a tranny competing with the help of the government in the free market.
	That's exactly what he is.
	And yet the right loves him.
	They think that he has saved free speech.
	And I said, well look, he's done some good things.
	It hasn't made a difference for me.
	But he's done some good things for free speech with Twitter.
	And I'm glad that he's staying there.
	I'm glad that he's had some wins in terms, like I talked about yesterday, in terms of Brazil and, you know, what was the other place?
	I forget what it was. They tried to do global censorship of something.
	And in both cases, he won.
	Said one country is not going to be able to globally censor.
	That's what he's for.
	You see, he has always been a partner with the governments.
	He partnered with them on electric vehicles with his subsidies.
	It helped to make him the richest man that ever lived.
	And he partners with them in terms of spy satellites, in terms of internet satellites, in terms of being able to get their payloads into space because the government has become so dysfunctional it can't get anything up anymore, you know, in the satellites.
	And so they have to go to somebody else.
	They have to, you know, outsource it.
	And he's deeply embedded with the intelligence communities, and so they're going to protect him.
	Now, is he sacrificially losing $40 billion for Twitter, or is he investing in a big future for himself?
	And we're going to take a look here at another government partnership that he has.
	This time, not with the American government, but with the German government.
	And this is not over electric cars, but it's over mRNA vaccines.
	Now, I've talked about CureVac before.
	And so has Elon Musk.
	He's tweeted about his involvement with CureVac.
	But Robert Kogan, who writes for The Daily Skeptic, and he also writes for Brownstone Institute, did a deep dive on what's going on with this company, CureVac, and its partnership with Tesla.
	It's all tied together with Tesla and partners with the German government.
	He says Musk himself, what people don't realize...
	Is that Musk himself is part of the mRNA project.
	And he has a direct commercial stake in it.
	You know the guy who wears a Baphomet costume?
	The guy who wants to put mind control devices in people's heads?
	The guy who talks about setting up social media as a hive mind and all the rest.
	Yeah, that guy. Yeah, the good guy.
	The guy that Alex Jones always loved.
	I mean, we always had that fight before we got into it with the vaccines and the January the 6th stuff.
	But Musk is a partner in Germany's mRNA project since Tesla has a partnership with a German mRNA company called CureVac to produce so-called RNA printers.
	RNA printers are an automated system for manufacturing mRNA and mRNA-based drugs.
	Yeah, he's developing the tools for the goldmine, right?
	MRA is their goldmine.
	Well, he's developing the picks and the axes for that.
	The patent application for the machines...
	Was jointly set up with a file by CureVac and Tesla's German subsidiary, Tesla Groman Automation.
	And he's got a link to it in this article at the Daily Skeptic.
	CureVac is Germany's other mRNA company, like BioNTech.
	And see, here's the key thing to think about, okay?
	BioNTech was the ones who created the mRNA vaccine.
	Pfizer was their marketing arm, essentially, globally.
	But it was a Pfizer-BioNTech.
	The BioNTech people actually developed it.
	And so there's two German companies that were involved heavily in mRNA technology.
	One of them was BioNTech, and the other one was CureVac, which has all these connections to Musk.
	As a matter of fact, CureVac was heavily funded by the German government.
	Just like BioNTech.
	And it got 61% of the amount that BioNTech got.
	And all this is significant as well in the legal games that were played by the FDA. Remember they said, we're going to declare that Pfizer BioNTech is...
	Is fully authorized or whatever.
	I forget now. Is approved.
	Yes. Emergency use authorization versus approval.
	And the terms authorization versus approval have significant legal differences.
	When they authorize it under emergency use, you can't mandate it.
	But when they fully approved it, And supposedly you can force people to take it or penalize them for it.
	Because, hey, it's FDA approved.
	And so they played that game and they said, well, you know, the Pfizer and the Pfizer-Corminati, which is the name that they marketed it under, the Corminati and the Pfizer-BioNTech, I'm sorry, the BioNTech shot are essentially the same, but legally distinct.
	And so they used that game here in the United States, the FDA did, in order to play this approved, not approved.
	And the reason they were playing that game was because of legal issues, legal immunity against damage from people.
	I mean, the whole thing is just a twisted, perverted lie.
	So, like BioNTech, whose COVID vaccine has been marketed by Pfizer in most of the world, the two German companies and their American rival was Moderna.
	CureVac was also in the running to produce a COVID-19 vaccine, but it did not get authorization.
	Whereas the German government has sponsored both of the German companies who went beyond mere sponsorship of CureVac in mid-June of 2020, Summer of 2020, when everybody's putting together their vaccine stuff.
	The German government took direct ownership stake in the company, acquiring nearly a quarter of its shares for 300 million euros.
	This means that CureVac's partner, Elon Musk's Tesla, is in fact a direct commercial partner of the German government, as he is a direct partner of the American government.
	And he's a direct partner of the military-industrial complex and the intelligence.
	Just two weeks after the German government acquired its stake in CureVac, Musk announced the pre-existing Tesla-CureVac partnership on Twitter, noting that Tesla would be able to build the RNA printers, or what he called the RNA microfactories, not just for CureVac, but also, quote, possibly for others.
	The tweet, July 2, 2020, Tesla, as a side project, is building RNA microfactories for CureVac and possibly others.
	In March of 2022, CureVac announced that it was indeed creating a fully-owned subsidiary, CureVac RNA Printer, GmbH, to build, and that's the German, like, you know, incorporated, to build the machines not just for their own purposes, but also potentially for other manufacturers.
	Two months after announcing his partnership with CureVac in early September 2020, Musk then turned up in Berlin to In the very midst of the so-called pandemic, to tout the mRNA machines.
	And I want you to see this, because this is one of these videos.
	It's not quite as interesting as the one where he grovels before Theory Breton, the EU censor.
	Yes, yes, I'll do whatever you say, right?
	But watch this. Here he is talking to a bunch of German parliamentarians, and they're just looking off.
	And it's not because they don't speak English.
	I've been to Germany several times.
	Everybody I've met speaks English, especially if they're in a situation like a parliamentarian.
	It is mixing up DNA, which has the computer program, with RNA as cryptase.
	The elements necessary for RNA. And it's magnetically stirring the DNA and the elements necessary to create the RNA. And the DNA sticks to the magnetic microparticles, and because the DNA sticks to the small magnetic particles, we're able to stir it with magnets.
	So this is the magnetically stirred, because the DNA is attaching to the magnetic microparticles, but the RNA does not attach to the magnetic microparticles.
	Isn't that interesting? Okay, so they can affect it with magnets.
	Oh, yeah.
	Well, there's this thing about, you know, people's, you know, I mean, we've had a lot of people talking about magnets and about graphite, graphene oxide or whatever.
	We'll get to that in a minute. But, you know, yeah, it's nothing to see there.
	Just move on. Not a problem.
	So, is it possible to talk about Elon Musk's involvement in Germany's mRNA project on social media platform X? Well, yes, you can, because, as he says, X is, after all, a free speech platform.
	And we would never think that there's any censorship there.
	But then he shows how when he criticized Musk about this, how he was criticized.
	He says, judging by my own previous experience.
	While we are perfectly free to talk about it, if we have anything critical to say, we're only free to talk about it in a void.
	Shadow banning, right?
	They will pretend that everybody's got free speech.
	This is what has been going on, you know, again, kicking people off the ballot, kicking people off the debates.
	If you want to protest at the RNC or the DNC conventions, for as long as I can remember, they'll say, okay, we're going to arrest you unless you go to this protest area.
	We have a free speech area.
	And that is many, many, many blocks away.
	From the convention.
	And they actually have a cage.
	And you can go inside that cage and you can take turns speaking on a microphone.
	And you can just speak into a void.
	That's what free speech is to these people.
	It's what free speech is to Musk on Twitter as well.
	Speaking to a void.
	Elon Musk first flagged his support for what he enthusiastically styled the mRNA revolution in April of 2023, admitting that the dose in the COVID vaccines had been too high, but expressing confidence that synthetic mRNA would be, quote, the surest path to curing cancer.
	Here's the exact quote, April 2023, a year ago.
	This will make some people upset.
	He said, but I need to emphasize that accelerating synthetic mRNA technology was another silver lining.
	Yeah, just like Trump.
	You know, my people, my people don't like it when I talk about mRNA, but the vaccine, but hey, it's just wonderful.
	It saved lives. Well, he's doing the same thing.
	He said, it is a revolution in medicine.
	It's like going from analog to digital.
	And I think that's a good analogy, right?
	Because what you're doing is you're reprogramming biology.
	You know, DNA really is like a digital code.
	And when you say it's like going from analog to digital, you're talking about how I'm going to reprogram DNA. It really is a code.
	You know, it's not binary.
	It's got four elements.
	But the way those things are developed demands that people have to understand there is intelligence.
	The creators of DNA acknowledged that, but they would not acknowledge God.
	So they invented another God.
	Well, I think it was space aliens who came here and created us.
	They know it had to be intelligence, but they will not ever consider the intelligence that created DNA and that wove together the Bible.
	They'll not even look at it.
	Anyway, Elon Musk continues.
	He said, the COVID mRNA vaccine dosage level was too high, and having a zillion booster shots, dot, dot, dot.
	So the problem was it was too high.
	Well, you know, the problem is that it varied from, by a factor of 33.
	It went from 3 to 100, and I always forget.
	I took a look up the measurement.
	I think it was micrograms, vector of ingredients.
	But, you know, again, a better way to think of it is, you know, they had different lot numbers.
	And depending on which vaccine you got, it was like taking one pill or swallowing the entire bottle.
	And they kept track of those because it was an experiment to see what they could get away with in terms of concentration and in terms of crimes.
	In terms of crimes, they can get away with everything, right?
	No responsibility at all for them.
	But again, I think the best way to understand this is, you know, they give you the medicine, and it's like, in some batches, you're going to get one pill.
	Another one, you're going to get the entire bottle.
	In response, I noted that his tweet amounted to shilling for biointect.
	So he says, so he puts out this tweet in April 12, 2023.
	And the writer says, well, I responded to that, and so did somebody else.
	He says, I noted that his tweet amounted to shilling for BioNTech.
	After all, the mRNA dose in the BioNTech vaccine was less than a third of that in the Moderna vaccine.
	So he's implicitly criticizing Moderna.
	He said, Curing cancer has been BioNTech's ambition from the start.
	He said, Before COVID, BioNTech was a cancer treatment company.
	Unlike Moderna, it wasn't focused on infectious diseases, right?
	He says, in light of research which has uncovered oncogenic properties of synthetic mRNA cancer-causing, I recently wondered whether this was because its drugs were in fact found to be promoting cancer rather than curing it.
	I said this from the very beginning.
	I said, if you look at what happens, what happens with the cancer?
	You know, my sister died from kidney cancer.
	And, you know, I started looking that up to see what it was.
	It's like, okay, so, you know, these tumors are messed up kidney cells.
	That go to other parts of your body and start trying to create a kidney there.
	And of course it doesn't.
	It just creates this mass of messed up cells.
	Busted and broken cells.
	But it is self-replicating.
	And so I thought, okay, so they're telling us that this mRNA is going to be self-replicating, that it's going to reprogram your body to create something, and it's going to keep redoing it.
	I said, that sounds an awful lot like cancer, doesn't it?
	And of course, you know, it does have these other effects as well.
	But it actually does seem like cancer itself.
	Reprogramming cells, busting their function, destroying them, replicating without end.
	And, of course, that's what people have been observing, is that the concentration of this stuff is not going down.
	I said, what's the off switch?
	Is there an off switch? Or is it like cancer?
	So he put some of that stuff in, and he put in a thread.
	He responded to somebody's tweet, and he had a thread of six tweets.
	And what Roger Cogan, or sorry, Robert Cogan, when he put that there, he said, and then he retweeted, he says, take a look at this.
	And he said, just click on this.
	And so what he did was, there you go right there.
	Well, this is interesting. Try clicking on the below tweet and see what you get.
	It's supposed to be a reply thread that involves six tweets.
	And so he puts the very first one there, and when you click on that, you should be able to see the thread of six tweets.
	Instead, what you see is only one, the first one.
	And then you see nothing underneath it.
	Nothing at all. And so then he posted the same thing with the second one.
	And so on.
	If you go to the Twitter, you see it.
	But, you know, again, he says, look at this one.
	And he puts the second tweet of the six-tweet thread there.
	And if you click on that, same thing.
	Nothing. You go to...
	See? There it is right there.
	There's absolutely nothing underneath it.
	And... He said, and not only that, but he said that was a response to somebody else's tweet.
	And he said there was no, and it was there as a comment as well.
	And he said that person's tweet, which is also critical of Elon Musk, had zero replies to it.
	Zero comments, I should say.
	Zero comments. And he said, and I know I commented on it.
	So I know that's a lie because there's at least one that's there.
	You know, I still see all the stuff whenever I look at comments underneath my tweets.
	Instead of seeing who commented, it almost invariably says, these tweets may be offensive.
	And you have to click two times to see them.
	And it is, you know, rarely, rarely, rarely is it anything that's offensive.
	It's typically things like, oh, that was great, thanks, or whatever.
	You know, something that has absolutely not even any content in it that you could be offended by, right?
	It wasn't a critical thing.
	It wasn't a hateful message.
	It's, yeah, it's good, thanks, or whatever, right?
	No, this might be offensive.
	It's the people, not the content, that they have decided to put there.
	So yeah, we see the conservatives who continually say that Elon Musk has saved free speech.
	I'm so sick and tired of seeing this.
	From so many people who are absolutely clueless and don't care.
	About his connections to the technocracy, about his connections to transhumanism, about his connections to governments worldwide, and not only to governments, but to the worst elements of the government, which is actually really the government, DARPA, CIA, intelligence community, the military-industrial complex.
	That's who he is attached to.
	No wonder that he proudly wears a Baphomet costume because that's the people that he hangs out with.
	It is a demonic cult.
	It is an anti-human cult.
	That's what government has become.
	That's what the global government has become.
	That's what the federal government has become.
	And he is their golden child that they shower with money.
	And he's completely deceived people like the Babylon Bee and others who think that he's just hung the moon.
	So yeah, clueless conservatives who worship benevolent billionaires.
	And the leftists who worship totalitarianism.
	But he's still the king of crony capitalism.
	Well, we've gone about a half hour.
	I'm going to take a quick break.
	When we come back, we're going to talk about the blood scandal in the UK. And I'm not talking about the blood clots and all the rest of the stuff from the MRN. Oh, no, they haven't gotten to that yet.
	It took them 30 years to get to this blood scandal.
	And we'll tell you what that is when we come back.
	and we'll be right back.
	♪♪♪
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, Britain covered up tainted blood scandal It's become quite a scandal in the UK. It has gotten a little bit of press coverage now in the United States.
	The British government did not put patient safety first.
	Really? Wow.
	Who would have thought? I'm just so destroyed.
	My confidence and my faith in government has just really been shaken.
	Unfortunately, a lot of people died.
	More than 3,000 deaths, more than 30,000 infections, according to a 2,527-page final report by a former judge from the High Court who investigated this.
	The National Health Service in Britain allowed blood that was tainted with HIV and hepatitis to be used on patients without their knowledge.
	And it went on for decades.
	Led to thousands of deaths.
	Tens of thousands of injuries.
	And they slow walked this whole thing.
	At first I saw this, I thought, you know, is this COVID? No, this was between 1970 and 1991.
	And we're going back 50, 30 to 50 years ago.
	I guess this is one of the reasons why the FDA and Pfizer wanted to embargo their incriminating evidence about how they colluded to kill people for money.
	They wanted to embargo that for, what, 65, 70 years or something?
	Patients were exposed through a variety of methods, including blood transfusions or given blood plasma or other blood products to treat conditions like hemophilia.
	So they go in for hemophilia and they give you hepatitis-tainted blood.
	Now, the problem is that most of this came from Britain, but some of it also involved products from the USA. Yes, our blood supply has been tainted for 50 years as well.
	Nobody is paying any attention to it.
	Just like the FDA doesn't care about what is injected into our blood, the vaccines and things like that.
	In several cases, health officials lied about the risks to patients.
	In others, patients were infected during research without their knowledge or consent.
	Including children whose parents' consent was not even sought.
	They didn't even seek the consent of the parents.
	Where are we seeing that now? Well, everywhere in our government, right?
	They've got something they want to do to your kids.
	If they want to vaccinate them, we had these moves to say that, well, COVID is just so serious.
	That the kids who they told us at the beginning were not at risk.
	If the kids want to get the vaccine because we have COVID, Lied to them because we've nudged them, because we've used propaganda on them.
	If the kids want to get the vaccine, then we need to get the parents out of the way.
	This is the way we stopped this thing.
	And so they don't want your parental consent when it comes to pushing LGBT content on your kindergarten child or any of the rest of this stuff.
	It is a war on parents as well and a war on consent.
	They don't want The adults to have informed consent, so why would they talk to the parents about what they're doing to the children?
	They don't want the parents to have, the parents are the ones who make the decision, but informed consent is out the window.
	And so is the whole idea of first, do no harm.
	So again, some of these tainted blood products were imported from the United States, often in the form of treatment for people with hemophilia.
	So, this judge's report, his name is Langstaff, his report found serious failures when it came to screening donors, including collecting blood from prisons and other things like that.
	And I remember when, again, this goes back to the 1970s, I remember my friend who went to West Point, he was a good guy, he would go in and give blood.
	It's perfectly healthy.
	But he would talk about how, you know, there's all these drug addicts and winos, you know, which is what we call homeless people, because for the most part they're homeless because they're addicted to drugs or alcohol.
	But, you know, they're all there giving blood.
	I remember he'd tell me, yeah, let's meet for lunch and I'll be finished giving blood.
	I need to get a steak or something.
	You're feeling really weak after that.
	You need to build it back up. He was a good guy.
	He was a little bit too trusting in government for his own good, but fortunately it worked out okay.
	He missed the wars because of other things that he was already involved in.
	Anyway, The answer to the question, was there a cover-up, is that there has been.
	Not in the sense of a handful of people plotting an orchestrated conspiracy to mislead, as we see with the COVID thing, but in a way that was more subtle, more pervasive, more chilling in its implications.
	In order to save face and to save expense, There has been a hiding of much of the truth, wrote the judge Langstaff.
	Well, you know, and that's part of it.
	Okay? And I think the truth is that when you look at these conspiracies, there's somebody that was high up that decided, well, we've got to have financial, you know, this is costing us too much.
	We need to look better. We need to look like we're saving money or whatever.
	Okay? Or we can't manage this, and we know there's problems, so don't let anybody know about it.
	Whatever their motivation was, there's going to be some people at the very top who are going to conspire to conceal the truth from people that they should know.
	And the rest of the people will just do it, like you said, in a more subtle, pervasive, and chilling way by going along because they don't want to rock the boat because they don't want to mess up their career, which is really kind of what these people at the top are doing as well.
	To save face, to save expense, There was a hiding of the truth.
	He said, over decades, successive governments repeated lines to take that were inaccurate, defensive, and misleading.
	But this is going over a 50-year period.
	And they've had the government in the UK led by all these different political parties, just as we have.
	These types of bureaucratic abominations, Go on and on, regardless of who the political party, the political parties come and go.
	And these politicians come and go.
	But the people who run the government in the UK, just as here, are the bureaucrats.
	You know, just take a look at Yes Minister, right?
	Out of the UK's great comedy that was there.
	In 1997, the Commission of Inquiry on the Blood System in Canada published its report.
	Which found that the federal government and health officials were aware of the risks of HIV and hepatitis transmission.
	And around 8,000 people died in Canada.
	And of course, they caught this thing 30 years ago.
	30,000 people were infected with hepatitis.
	2,000 got HIV during the 1970s and 80s in Canada as well.
	Now, the interesting thing, I think, is that there has been absolutely no concern about this in the United States.
	Mainstream media will cover it and say, well, you know, what's going on with the blood supply?
	And, of course, I've had on many times people who are trying to do so, who are focused on the blood supply now because we know that mRNA is circulating in the blood of a lot of people who took the jab, and we don't want to get that.
	But, of course, the Red Cross has said they're not going to screen for that.
	Perhaps they're not screening for hepatitis and other things as well.
	Because again, they admit that a lot of this stuff that was tainted came from the United States, but there will be no inquiry here.
	And there will be no concern about mRNA, and they're not even talking about that in Canada and the UK, where they're talking about this other scandal that's 50 years ago.
	But you better be thinking about it.
	But when we look at what's going to happen to any of these people, Not much at all.
	As a matter of fact, I thought it was kind of interesting.
	You had Tucker Carlson talking to Glenn Beck about Boris Johnson and how he wanted to interview Boris Johnson.
	And just to give you an insight into Boris Johnson's character, I think it's important to look at what Tucker has to say about that.
	It reminds me a great deal of what John Kiriakou said.
	In terms of trying to get his record esponged, he had been sent to jail, if you recall.
	John Kiriakou was a CIA whistleblower on the torture program that Gina Haspel ran and that Gina Haspel covered up, the Gina Haspel that Trump made the head of the CIA. And so, as Trump was getting ready to leave office, he heard, you know, there were Pardons, there's a lot of talk about pardons for a lot of people.
	Of course, Trump pardoned the really, really big white-collar criminal friends of the Kushner family and some other people who could, I guess, help him.
	But he went to Rudy Giuliani.
	He sat there talking to Rudy Giuliani and he had two aides there.
	And so he says, well, you know, about this pardon.
	And Rudy says, I got to go to the bathroom.
	And so he gets up to go to the bathroom.
	And when he goes to the bathroom, leaves the room.
	The aides said to him, you can have a pardon, but it'll cost you a million dollars.
	I said, well, my pension's not worth that much.
	He says, first of all, I don't have a million dollars.
	And secondly, I wouldn't pay you.
	I wouldn't pay you to get a pardon.
	Just in principle. But it doesn't even make any economic sense.
	And then Rudy comes back into the room and pretends that he's not a part of this.
	Rudy Giuliani, who just celebrated his 80th birthday, and as he was walking out, he got served a sum and so on.
	I have no sympathy.
	What he's going to go to jail for is probably not a crime if they get him to go to jail, if they punish him for any of that stuff.
	It'll be like Dennis Hastert.
	You know, the real crimes go unpunished.
	They manufacture other stuff to come after these people.
	But let's talk about Boris Johnson.
	This is what Tucker Carlson had to say about him.
	So I'm over in Moscow.
	I'm waiting to do this interview.
	It gets out that we're doing it, and I'm immediately denounced by this guy called Boris Johnson, who was for a short time the prime minister of Great Britain.
	And Boris Johnson calls me a tool of the Kremlin And I'm thinking, well, that's kind of... I mean, his name's not actually Boris, as I'm sure you know.
	His name is Alex Johnson.
	He called himself Boris in high school.
	So the guy who calls himself Boris is accusing me?
	So I was annoyed. So I put in a request for an interview with Boris Johnson, as I have many times because he's constantly denouncing me as a tool of the Kremlin.
	He says no. So I'm thinking about getting more annoyed.
	So I know a lot of people who know Boris Johnson.
	So... I reach out to them.
	Finally, one of his advisors gets back to me and says, he will talk to you, but it's going to cost you a million dollars.
	He wants a million dollars in US dollars, gold or Bitcoin.
	Now, these guys won't talk about Rudy, right?
	And I'm like, he wants a million dollars.
	Yeah. And then he will talk to you about Ukraine.
	He will explain his position on Ukraine and explain what.
	So he attacks me.
	Without explaining how I'm wrong, of course, or how he's right, this is, by the way, the guy who single-handedly, at the request of the US government, stopped the peace deal in Ukraine a year and a half ago, and is, I think, for that reason, responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people.
	He won't explain any of that to me in an interview until I pay him a million dollars.
	And I said to the guy, you know, I just interviewed Vladimir Putin.
	I'm not defending Putin, but Putin didn't ask for a million dollars.
	So you're telling me that Boris Johnson is a lot sleazier, a lot lower than Vladimir Putin.
	Okay. Which is true.
	Yeah. So this whole thing is a freaking shakedown.
	Why $60 billion? I mean, I could get boring on this because I've learned a lot about it.
	But $60 billion is not going to allow Ukraine to prevail over Russia.
	No honest person thinks that's going to work.
	This is a money laundering operation.
	A lot of the people involved in making money from it.
	And if you're making money off a war, you know, you can deal with God on that because that's really important.
	Immoral. Like, that's actually really, really wrong.
	Yeah, well, that's the way it works.
	That's the way it works, yeah.
	You make money off of war.
	And, you know, you pay Boris a million dollars, and if you're a government or something, and you get back tens of billions of dollars.
	And what do you think so much of that money that has disappeared, it's not all going to villas on the Riviera for Zelensky's wife and shell corporations and stuff.
	No, a lot of that's going to channel its way back to the politicians who authorized the funds for them, right?
	They're going to be kickbacks for that stuff.
	Did hospitals mark the COVID unvaccinated for special treatment?
	You know, I wanted to play that just so you could see how rampant the corruption is.
	And, of course, they will never talk about Rudy and Trump selling stuff.
	But yeah, did hospitals mark the COVID unvaccinated for special treatment?
	Yes, they did. As a matter of fact, we've talked about this for the longest time.
	In order to suppress the adverse effects from the vaccines, if you went in and got a vaccine and you had any kind of reaction to it, well, you were unvaccinated.
	Technically, you know, these adverse effects were not really an issue.
	You were not considered to be vaccinated until a couple of weeks after your second shot.
	So anything you have before that, you know, just put that down in the category as unvaccinated.
	You die? Well, that was an unvaccinated death.
	You didn't get the full shots.
	During the COVID era, we have already seen that certain policies turned out to be extremely harmful were applied to people who were perceived to be more vulnerable.
	Is it possible that the unvaccinated were also treated as more vulnerable and that they were marked out for special treatment?
	Well, this article from Jonathan Engler says a couple of months ago, as I reported on a paper by Martin Neal, Norman Fenton, and Scott McLaughlin, in which they systematically analyzed all the COVID vaccine studies that they could find, they categorized them by the extent to which the authors had miscategorized vaccinated subjects as unvaccinated, thereby massively biasing the results in favor of the vaccines.
	Again, the You know, two weeks past the second shot thing.
	All the most common ones.
	The miscategorization error on its own will introduce a significant bias even if the vaccinated and the unvaccinated received the same standards of care.
	But what if they didn't receive the same standard of care?
	What if the unvaccinated received treatments which worsened their outcomes?
	Well, that would act synergistically in order to bias the results even further.
	And, of course, he's got in here a link to something that was sent to him by Robert Kogan, who I just talked about with Elon Musk.
	Did the excellent article on that.
	Again, he writes for Daily Skeptic and Brownstone.
	And he said he sent me links to several tweets because, you know, you're not going to be able to find his stuff if you...
	We're just looking by subject.
	It's just amazing, isn't it?
	And it's just amazing to me how blind the conservatives are to what Musk is doing with censorship, to what Musk is doing with other governments, to what Musk is doing with a green agenda, with a transhumanist agenda.
	All the technocracy and all the rest of this stuff is just amazing to me.
	Anyway, he's got a clip there of a June 2022 official WHO guidance for clinical management of COVID-19.
	And it has three bullet points for severity of disease, including assessment of risk factors.
	So here are the risk factors.
	Older age...
	Immunosuppression and or chronic disease.
	And the third one was lack of vaccination.
	Let's put up those other things.
	And so if you check those boxes, any of those, then you are assessed for being at risk.
	And he sent him several different documents that would all label being unvaccinated as one of the biggest risks that you could have in terms of risk factors.
	And then what is it that they prescribe for people who are at risk?
	Remdesivir. Run.
	Death is near.
	Oh, you're unvaccinated?
	Oh, okay. Well, we'll put you on remdesivir.
	How about that? We'll give you an IV shot of remdesivir.
	That should do it. Look at that.
	All these unvaccinated people, they're dying.
	See? If you get vaccinated, maybe we won't kill you with remdesivir if you get into the hospital.
	How about that? Is that a deal?
	And I tell you, the medical community is so absolutely criminal and has been that way.
	It's just now we're starting to see where the bodies and the data are buried.
	It's starting to come out now.
	Pfizer whistleblower says about a third of Pfizer's COVID injections contained graphene oxide.
	Last week, Pfizer whistleblower Melissa McAtee said that Pfizer's internal database had evidence from a laboratory in Spain that up to a third of COVID injection vials contained graphene oxide.
	She said...
	First thing I found was in June or July of 2021, and it was a graphene oxide report from Spain that this lab had found graphene oxide in one vial of Pfizer vaccine that did not have a full dosage in it.
	She said, and so they compared it under a microscope to 100% graphene oxide, and they determined that it looks almost identical.
	But they requested more samples, so they could do a more structural chemical analysis than just a visual one.
	McAtee said that later, much later, I followed up on them to see what happened, and if I remember correctly, 28 vials out of 100 did have graphene oxide.
	And the Pfizer vials.
	Well, if you want to know more about that, and they don't mention it, surprisingly, in this, look at what they did in Japan, right?
	Twice. One of them is 1.2 million doses.
	Another one, a second time, that was distinct from that.
	They found another million doses and they threw away those 2.2 million doses.
	They said, we see black things that have precipitated into this and they interact with magnets.
	I don't know.
	If it's the same thing, but again, you might want to take a look at that.
	The Pfizer whistleblower goes on to note that the Spanish lab requested more, and when I found this on the internal Pfizer database, I didn't know it was the internal Pfizer database.
	I actually thought it was just an internet public knowledge.
	But I shared that report on my Facebook, and I got a call not long after that, I don't know how long, but not long after that, from a Pfizer lawyer telling me that I had to take down the post because it was company property.
	That's when I realized, hey, I guess I can see Pfizer's internal database, she said.
	So she started searching in the database for the code HEK293T. What is that?
	That's the aborted fetal cell lines.
	It was at the center of this controversy so much.
	So she said...
	At first return, search results in the email that Pfizer executives and communications departments were conspiring to hide that aborted fetal cell lines were used in the development and the testing for the vaccine.
	And because this is a big issue with a lot of people, I said, I'm not going to use a product that is tainted by this stuff.
	Remember, we had those discussions.
	And as they were trying to trick people up, you know, they said, well, you know, even aspirin's been tested.
	No, aspirin went back to the 1800s.
	More recently, they may have tested it on some of these fetal cell lines, but that's not instrumental in the creation of aspirin.
	It was kind of a natural thing from willow bark.
	It goes back to the 1800s.
	Anyway, that became a real sticking point.
	So she said, then she looked at the graphene oxide thing.
	She said, the first thing I found was that in June or July of 2021, we found this graphene oxide thing.
	But she said, in terms of the cell lines, she said, it's not just the religious issue.
	But she said it's also the fact that there's an extra cancer risk from this cell line.
	It's not just because they're immortal cell lines and, you know, you should be concerned about anything that starts to affect your DNA and that keeps replicating.
	You know, one of the objections to their lab meat, right?
	These cell lines that just keep replicating.
	HEK293T is the code for the human embryonic kidney.
	That's HEK. The 293T cells, the T in that, refers to the presence of the simian vaculating virus 40, the SV40, the large T antigen.
	The SV40T antigen is a protein that is the dominant acting oncoprotein, the cancer-causing protein, the gene that has a potential to cause cancer.
	Remember, they're finding this now.
	Contamination of the Pfizer vaccines, along with a lot of junk DNA, which, again, can junk up your body and junk up your DNA. So according to McAtee, the COVID vaccine manufacturer did not include the HEK cells.
	They were only used to develop the vaccines.
	But now we are seeing that this SV40 is a component there.
	So was it just used in testing, or how did it get its way in there?
	And so, again, you know, the Jiki Leaks came back, and so they worked for a lot of years to try to expose the COVID agenda.
	There's somebody that's on her side, and they were worried that she had gone too far with this.
	Said, please stop. This is not used in manufacturing.
	It's simply used for testing the product, the HEK process.
	293T line. But again, since it is associated with the SV40 virus, how is the SV40 virus getting in there, the fragment of it?
	And it is there.
	But because he said that about the HEK, you had AP fact-checkers try to say that the graphene oxide was not true.
	But the reality is that was a different thing.
	And that was, out of the 100 vials tested by the lab in Spain, 28 vials were found to contain graphene oxide.
	A study of a larger sample needs to be done to establish how widespread the use of graphene oxide was in terms of the number of vaccine batches.
	Again, start with Japan.
	They threw out 2.2 million vaccine doses that had black particulates in it.
	As we read the excerpt from the abstract paper, we should recall that, as one of the people explained, the lipid nanoparticle used in the mRNA injections is a cationic lipid particle.
	It said graphene oxide is employed in a broad range of biomedical applications, including antimicrobial therapies, scaffolds for tissue engineering, and drug delivery, among others.
	However, the inability to load it efficiently...
	With double-stranded DNA impairs its use as a gene delivery system.
	So to overcome this limitation, to be able to deliver genetic code with your injection, the functionalization of graphene oxide with cationic lipids It's proficiently accomplished by microfluidic manufacturing.
	So, again, they're aware that that is a limitation of it, and they want desperately to get that in as part of a way to do DNA, to mess with your DNA. Fluoride.
	High fluoride level in water is a risk to the developing brain.
	Who knew? Who knew? We've known this for decades.
	It's interesting. I mean, this case is finally getting a hearing, a lawsuit, and we'll see what happens with it.
	But there are now, we're seeing more and more articles about it lately.
	And we should pay attention to all these different things that are making their way into our food and water and our medicine.
	Pregnant women exposed to high levels of fluoride nearly double the odds of a child having neurobehavioral issues by the age of three.
	Ah, the terrible twos, so to speak.
	And we never had that with our boys.
	We were not on fluoridated water.
	We were on well water.
	Actually, we took them to the pediatrician and the guy wanted to give us fluoride pills.
	I said, no, I'm not going to do that.
	Including symptoms such as anxiety and emotional regulation problems.
	The findings, revealed by researchers who examined just under 230 mother-child pairs, came amid the UK government's controversial plans to add fluoride to drinking water supplies to improve dental health, which it doesn't even do that.
	This is a study coming out of the University of Florida, found correlations between increased fluoride levels in pregnant women's urine and higher reports of neurobehavioral problems in their children.
	These issues were self-reported by the mothers and included headaches, stomach pain, suggested a potential concern for fetal brain development.
	But no concern about putting in industrial waste, even the kind of fluoride that they put into the water.
	Industrial waste product from the aluminum industry and from the nuclear industry.
	And it's used as a pesticide and rat poison in China.
	But we put it in our water because it would have been very expensive for them if they had left it in its form there and had pretended that it was something that was good for us.
	They would have had to pay to dispose of it safely.
	But instead, they can get municipalities to pay them to dump it into our water.
	And regardless of what you think about fluoride, Please explain to me why you would ever try to medicate people through a water system.
	How do you control the dosage for that?
	Oh, well, they don't care about controlling dosage, do they?
	Anyway, let's end with something positive here.
	And just to reiterate, as Joel Hirshhorn has said many times, talking about vitamin D. This is yet another article about the importance of vitamin D. Evidence continues to accumulate showing that vitamin D helps to combat cancer.
	Good news. Good news.
	And everybody agrees.
	You know, at the beginning of all this, Alex sold vitamin D supplements.
	And I wanted to make sure that people understood that there wasn't any question about it.
	I had quotes. From scientists high up in the NIH as well as the FDA scientists talking about vitamin D and talking about it in terms of this.
	And they said, well, look, it's not going to cure anything, but it's going to boost your immune system.
	Which is the most important thing, right?
	Your immune system is what is going to defend you.
	So you want to boost your immune system with vitamin D. And, of course, the best way to do that is to get sunlight.
	And as Joel Hirshhorn has said, the...
	The way that your body reacts to sunlight is going to be different for different people.
	People have different levels of melanin in their skin, in case you haven't noticed.
	I think everybody's noticed that.
	We have different skin colors, and we're reorganizing our society along those lines.
	But that means also the real effect of that is that you're going to react differently to sunlight and vitamin D creation.
	And you want to...
	Even if you're supplementing with vitamin D or whether you're getting sunlight, if you've got some health issues, get a blood test and see what your vitamin D level is.
	And then, you know, look at how your body responds to that because you may need to increase your vitamin D or maybe even decrease it.
	But usually it's a case that your body is not processing it as much.
	So you want to fine tune that and pay attention to it.
	Look, we're going to take a quick break.
	And when we come back, we're going to talk about a couple of perhaps some jab deaths and some other issues.
	I'm not quite finished with the pharmaceutical stuff.
	I've got a couple more things that I want to talk about.
	So we'll be right back.
	Welcome back.
	So we'll be right back.
	♪♪
	Analyzing the globalist's next move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Well, you know, we've had a couple of deaths that have been reported that people died suddenly.
	I couldn't understand why. One of them, a guy who works in a high-pressure financial job, but was very young, 25, one of the big banks.
	And he said, well, you know, maybe we're just putting too much pressure on our people.
	I was like, it wouldn't have anything to do with him being jabbed, would it?
	You know, he drops dead suddenly.
	And then we had a CNN political commentator, Alice Stewart, Who died at 58.
	Not very long, within I think 24 hours or so of having been on the network, everybody was very surprised by it.
	They said there's no foul play, even suspected.
	Authorities believe that it was a medical emergency, but was it the vaccine?
	Well, of course, CNN is not going to say that because they pressured everybody to get the vaccines, just as Fox News did.
	Everybody was pressuring their employees to get it.
	We're still all processing this news as it was so sudden.
	Now, why do I jump to the conclusion that it was a vaccine?
	Well, because we have seen this so often, and we have now been told that it's now normal.
	We've moved the Overton window so that it is now normal for children to die while participating in sports.
	So normal that in many school boards, they are requiring cardiograms for kids before they participate in sports.
	So we move the Overton window.
	No, actually what we're doing is we're throwing people out the window.
	We're defenestrating our kids as well as other people to cover up for these medical criminals that are doing this stuff.
	Again, the other guy was a 25-year-old Bank of America analyst.
	And so in order to cover up for this, he's playing soccer at a company event and he drops dead.
	As so many professional soccer players have done.
	But they try to say, well, maybe it's the pressures of the job.
	Maybe we should take a look at this.
	Yeah, it was the pressure of the job to get a jab.
	But, you know, we've got these other professional soccer players dropping dead, which is now supposed to be a new normal thing.
	They were not under a lot of pressure working at a desk job.
	And so we have CDC Director Robert Redfield.
	I'm very suspicious of this guy.
	I never trusted him.
	It's Trump's guy. He's out, and he's said three or more times now, oh, the bird flu.
	Bird flu is going to be it. Everybody's talking about the bird.
	Bird is the word, right?
	And so I think he's trying to get his credibility up with the MAGA people.
	And he says, it's high time to talk about the significant side effects of the COVID vaccines.
	No, actually, the time to talk about that was four years ago, pal, when you were pushing this, along with Trump, to rush this stuff out without doing any testing.
	He said on Thursday last week, he said, many officials who tried to warn the public about potential problems with COVID vaccines were pressured into silence.
	Time to admit that there were significant side effects that made people sick, says the Operation Warp Speed co-conspirator.
	And he did this in an interview last Thursday with another co-conspirator and proven liar, Chris Cuomo.
	You know, it's kind of interesting to see how people reacted to Michael Cohen, a guy who's gone to jail.
	He's always got absolutely no credibility.
	You know, he went to jail for lying and cheating and, you know, now we see for stealing and everything.
	Why is it that Chris Cuomo would have any credibility?
	Why is it that Tucker Carlson would have any credibility?
	They're proven liars just like Michael Cohen is about something that is far more consequential.
	People died because of their lies, because of the lies of Chris Cuomo and Tucker Carlson and Robert Redfield.
	So now we've got this parade of all these people who were lying to you four years ago.
	And we're supposed to believe what they say now?
	Do you realize that they've got an agenda here?
	Again, you know, Chris Cuomo, as he was making fun of people with the ivermectin stuff, was taking it himself.
	And we said that at the time.
	You know, he had these symptoms, and some of the symptoms were described, and he said, vaccine.
	It's a vaccine, symptoms.
	And now he's saying, well, I kind of think it was a vaccine, but I can't say, you know...
	And when you look at all this, again, Trump could have...
	Stopped the punishment of doctors and pharmacists who were putting out ivermectin.
	Trump could have even manufactured it himself with the government.
	He gave himself the power with a wars legislation or something, War Powers Act.
	Gave himself the power to commandeer manufacturing facilities, Ford and GM, to manufacture the ventilators that killed people.
	High 80s to 90% of the people who got put on these ventilators died.
	Trump commandeered automobile companies to make this machine of death, and yet he wouldn't do anything to allow people to even get ivermectin, let alone manufacture it.
	Don't talk to me about how he was controlled by Fauci.
	It's just ridiculous.
	And again, he's another one of these traitors.
	Chris Cuomo and Tucker Carlson.
	Oh, we're not allowed to talk about that.
	You know, there'd be repercussions. Same thing we heard with the blood contamination in the UK. Well, you know, they just went along because they didn't want to stand out and they didn't want to get punished and everything.
	So thousands of people died.
	Tens of thousands of people got very, very sick with what they injected them with.
	But that's completely different, isn't it, from the COVID shots, for which there is no inquiry yet.
	COVID-19 and the vaccine contributed to an increase in rare autoimmune diseases in 2021.
	They peaked in 2021, right about that time.
	One of the diseases was a melanoma type of thing.
	Anti-MDA5 dermomyositis, an inflammatory disease.
	Characterized by muscle weakness, skin rashes, and rapidly progressive lung disease.
	Oh, it must be long COVID that you're dying from, right?
	And isn't it interesting how we continue to see inflammatory disease, inflammatory disease?
	You know, when we look at myocarditis and pericarditis, what are they?
	Inflammatory disease of the heart, just located in different places.
	We've even got, as a side effect of these vaccines...
	Inflammation of the eye. You know, not conjunctivitis, but uveitis, which is inflammation from the inside out, whereas conjunctivitis is from the outside out.
	But, oh, that's bird flu, too.
	Now, that guy that had their one case of supposed bird flu, the guy had no temperature.
	He had no involvement in any lung congestion.
	He had pink eye.
	He's working on a farm with cows.
	Maybe he just didn't wash his hands.
	Anyway, this anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis is very rare.
	We got to learn how to pronounce that because I guess it's not going to be rare now if they've connected it with the shots.
	An autoimmune condition, yet again, which attacks itself.
	It often appears without a clear cause.
	Yeah, we just can't imagine why these people drop dead.
	We can't imagine why we're seeing all this autoimmune disease out there.
	And yet one patient says we are not invisible.
	And wrote a poem about it.
	It's on LifeSite News.
	Sought to bring awareness to the struggles of those with COVID vaccine injuries.
	We're not invisible. We're here in plain sight.
	You just refuse to look and understand our plight.
	You know, that type of thing. And it goes on and on.
	We've been injured. We're in constant pain.
	With even friends and families leaving us feeling ostracized.
	You still flood the channels with those deadly lies.
	The losses mount before our eyes, and your mainstream madness you deceive with impunity, while only the manufacturers receive immunity.
	Yep. And I like the way that it was ended.
	When the poisoned apple is offered anew, we won't take a bite of that witch's brew.
	Yeah, that's exactly the way I see this.
	That's one analogy that's useful from Disney.
	The Wicked Witch, Pfizer, Trump, Fauci, take your pick.
	You can put it with all of those there.
	And this, going back to 2021, an article from NPR in 2021 saying vaccine hesitancy in the U.S. is a peculiar privilege.
	Oh, see, these people with NPR in the left, right, how do they attack you?
	Well, if they call you privileged, it means that they hate you.
	Privilege is to be hated.
	So they throw that around just like they throw around the term racist.
	And vaccine hesitancy was not a privilege, as a matter of fact.
	They were telling us that having a job, traveling, going to school, going to church, all these different things, those were privileges that they were going to grant us in exchange for getting vaccinated.
	Do you see how they invert and twist all of this stuff inside out?
	I want to wait and watch, is how they began.
	How dare you? What an arrogant thing for anybody to say, well, this is a completely different untested vaccine, a completely different mechanism.
	Nobody's ever had any mRNA medication in any way, shape, or form, and this is an injection of mRNA?
	I think I should, I want to see this tested.
	How dare you, says NPR. And of course, this is 2021, so now it is Biden's vaccine, and it's safe for the left to push it.
	This is a peculiar response I received from my friends and some family members in the U.S. when I asked them about their thoughts on the COVID vaccination.
	This is a peculiar response for a couple of reasons.
	COVID vaccines are exceptionally effective, now readily available, and the best way to end the pandemic and return to normalcy.
	All of those are lies.
	Because, again, we're talking about NPR. I know that's redundant.
	Meanwhile, back to the current time.
	We're seeing over and over again these mandates that were being put out there on the back of them telling people.
	That was in September of 2021.
	And in September 2021, what did we have?
	We had the fiat declaration that now the vaccines are safe, even though we've not tested them.
	And so that was when the pressure was being applied to everybody, the blackmail, the bribery, the mandates for people in the military.
	All of that time. Now, Colorado University's vaccine mandate has been found by a court to violate the U.S. Constitution.
	Federal Court. Tenth Circuit said in a decision.
	And then they later updated the mandate, and the Tenth Circuit Court says, no, this newer version also violates the Constitution.
	It's time to get some compensation from these people, folks.
	Forget about the anti-Semitic awareness thing.
	Take some money out of this, the hide of this demon we call the university system.
	Take it out of them when they mandated you.
	You should realize by now that in most cases your degree is worthless.
	They ripped you off for this thing.
	I mean, I didn't play it, but it was really funny.
	It was Thomas Jefferson University.
	And they were reading out the names of people.
	And they had somebody who was reading the names and didn't even know at Thomas Jefferson University how to pronounce the name Thomas.
	Obviously somebody, foreign speaker or something.
	Tomas is how they read somebody.
	It's crazy. And people went, they paid $38,000 a year to go to this university.
	Now, the present value of your college degree might be positive if you get it in something like engineering.
	And there was just recently an article about that, looking at different majors.
	But, you know, for the most part, you're still overpaying for it today.
	My tuition was less than the books that I had to buy.
	It was a state school, but now even the state schools are expensive.
	Anyway, so this college in Colorado initially offered religious exemptions to anyone who checked a box, but later said they would, quote, only recognize religious exemptions based on religious beliefs whose teachings are opposed to all immunizations.
	For example, they said Christian scientists would qualify for an exemption, but Buddhists would not.
	Which takes us back to...
	It kind of makes you believe in this Buddhist thing that everything is in everything else, if you look at his PCR test.
	Anyway, they also said that exemptions would only be granted to people who had never received any vaccinations.
	Well, one of these vaccinations is not like the others.
	As a matter of fact, this particular vaccination, in the very first month before these mandates rolled out in September, the very first month, it was already, they had more adverse effects reported into their system, even though they were discouraging it actively.
	They had more reported into their system than they did for several years.
	And within a month or two, it was more than they had had reported in all 35 years for all vaccines combined.
	So you're going to talk to me about previous vaccinations?
	17 students and employees, all of whose applications were denied, sued over the policy, alleging it was discriminatory.
	U.S. District Judge Raymond Moore, an appointee of Obama in 2022, ruled that the plaintiffs did not show that they would suffer irreparable harm.
	But that ruling was wrong and overturned by the 10th Amendment, the 10th Circuit Court.
	It should have been overturned by the 10th Amendment as well.
	And again, you know, when we look at this, it is absolutely amazing to see that all the politicians, not just Rishi Sunak is there, he's now covering But it was every political party in the UK, every prime minister that's been there for the last 50 years was involved in their blood scandal.
	And when we're talking about the scandal of ivermectin, we have Dr.
	Kathleen Ruddy, who is a cancer surgeon.
	And she is now saying, you know, I think ivermectin might be a cure for cancer.
	Whoa. Whoa.
	This doctor wants to commit career suicide for sure.
	I mean, the FDA has added in for people who talk about ivermectin, even though we had, you know, millions, tens of millions of people.
	Worldwide, it showed how effective it was in an off-label use.
	But boy, if you talk about curing cancer, that's always been the third rail for the medical communities.
	So I'm glad she's putting this out there, but I imagine she'll be looking for another line of work.
	Cancer surgeon Dr.
	Kathleen Ruddy has seen several late-stage cancer patients make dramatic recoveries after taking ivermectin.
	She said one patient, she said there was absolutely, you know, a grim future.
	This man had stage 4 prostate cancer and had tried all the conventional protocols before the doctors told him there was nothing they could do.
	By the way, you know, I don't know if I mentioned it on air.
	Somebody sent me an email asking me what Dave Sanborn, who I talked about last week, David Sanborn, the jazz alto sax player, what did he die of?
	And it was prostate cancer that he'd been fighting since 2018.
	So I don't think it was.
	Anything to do with the jab.
	It may have come back or he may have, you know, been able to beat it back and maybe it accelerated it or something like that.
	But he had had it for quite some time, was working with it.
	And, you know, you have a situation like this.
	We've had, usually works out to be fatal, but it was stage four.
	He had tried everything.
	The doctor said there was nothing to do.
	Then he started taking ivermectin, she said.
	And she said within six months...
	The metastatic lesions, that's the tumors that had distributed all over his body, began to disappear and in less than a year, he was out dancing for four hours, three nights per week.
	A similar scenario unfolded for another man named Eddie.
	He was also in bad shape.
	Eddie was diagnosed with two unresectable esophageal tumors that surgeons would not go near.
	He was a smoker.
	He couldn't swallow. He had lost 40 pounds in a year and a half.
	Within a couple weeks after taking ivermectin, he sounded stronger, he could swallow, and he had gained six pounds.
	His voice was better, she said.
	Several weeks later, she said to Eddie, you need to get a scan.
	She said, guess what happened?
	He got the scan.
	There was no tumors, esophageal tumors in his throat.
	Gone. Gone, she said.
	The problem was that he had sold his fishing boat.
	That was his biggest problem.
	Darn, I sold my fishing boat because I thought I was going to die.
	Good problem to have.
	He was getting better, his tumor was gone, and now he had to buy another fishing boat.
	I was like, wow, that's interesting.
	And then she talked about a third case and even more.
	It's... Isn't that interesting?
	And I imagine the FDA will come after her because they don't want to have a cure for cancer.
	They don't like ivermectin.
	Again, just thought I'd pass that on to you.
	Vitamin D, ivermectin, put that on your list.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	♪♪♪
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, I want to talk a little bit about this pier that's been put up to take food into Gaza.
	First of all, understand what a ridiculously expensive and complicated solution this is to something that is simply a political issue.
	First images of the American taxpayer's $350 million completed Gaza Pier.
	The Pentagon says that it is very proud of this.
	They said it's very unique.
	And it only costs about $350 million.
	Critics have pointed out the grim irony and the contradictions which abound in the fact that the Biden administration has very publicly criticized the way that Israel's military is waging war in Gaza, while simultaneously Washington is funding it to the tune of billions of dollars.
	And then when you look at this pier, as Daniel McAdams with the Ron Paul Institute said, this floating pier costs you $350 million and counting.
	While using existing roads for aid delivery remains the most practical solution.
	The question is, why are they building this pier?
	We've had food trucks that are backed up and waiting to deliver food, but the Israelis, our allies, won't allow that.
	So the solution is to build a pier.
	And then there's all these, you know, can't have, it's got to be on the land side, it's got to be secured by Israeli people because we can't have Americans step foot on that land.
	So we go through all of these twisting, ridiculous, absurd, Kafkaesque types of movements.
	The U.S. taxpayer is on the hook for both bombs and humanitarian aid.
	We always wind up funding both sides of every war.
	So as we look at this, the question is, you know, why go to such a ridiculous thing?
	Intercepts Jeremy Scahill says the fact that the U.S. is establishing a pier off of the Gaza coast because the Israeli government, which the U.S. funds, arms, and politically bolsters and shields from international and U.S. law, will not allow aid into Gaza by land.
	He says this is a damning statement about the Biden administration and about the entire U.S. government.
	Look, it's not just the Biden administration.
	It's also Mike Johnson, the GOP, that is furiously prostituting itself to the Israeli lobby for support, financial and otherwise.
	At the same time that America's own bridges, roads, and border...
	And that our energy infrastructure is actually actively being destroyed and dismantled by the U.S. government.
	They're actually destroying and dismantling our energy infrastructure.
	They're destroying and dismantling our border.
	They won't do anything about fixing the decaying roads and bridges in many places.
	Instead, we're going to build a pier.
	When our quote-unquote allies won't allow people to drive a short distance to deliver food.
	To a civilian population that is starving.
	So, Anne Wright on CommonDreams.org talks about being a Rube Goldberg solution.
	You know, Rube Goldberg, the cartoon thing where you, you know, have a lever and it hits a foot with a shoe on it and it kicks this thing and a ball goes rolling down and triggers something else.
	You know, it's a ridiculous solution.
	Complicated contraption to do a very simple task.
	Rube Goldberg. He was a cartoonist who drew those things up.
	Instead of Biden marking a red line in the sand, demanding that Israel allow aid into Gaza via ground transportation, his diplomatic team sent out a plea for help to the U.S. military.
	And she says, while in the U.S. Army and the Army Reserves for 29 years, I thought I had seen some pretty stupid things that the military was told by politicians to do.
	It always begins with politicians deciding the easiest, most sensible solution to a problem would have too much political baggage, and so it would cost them votes in the next election.
	So they look for a politically expedient solution, which is invariably very expensive and convoluted.
	So in this vein, all too often, politicians turn to the U.S. military for a solution to a non-military problem.
	Isn't that right? You know, just like our war on drugs.
	No, it's not a law enforcement problem.
	We've made it a law enforcement problem because we've corrupted a lot of law enforcement officials as well as the judicial system with a drug war.
	But the drug war is a spiritual issue.
	It's not even, certainly not a law enforcement issue.
	This is a political will issue and an appearance issue, but they're going to turn to the U.S. military to try to make sure that they don't get blamed for something.
	Yeah, the spinelessness has a real cost to it.
	So she says, so you have some A-type personality in the military, presents a harebrained scheme to the politicians, probably never thinking that the idea would be accepted, but it is accepted.
	And to get the politicians out of a jam.
	And the next thing you know is that the Rube Goldberg crazy idea is being funded.
	In this particular case, instead of Biden marking a line in the sand of Israel, Gaza, and Egypt, demanding that Israel allow into Gaza the miles, the miles of tractor-trailer loads of food and medicine to That have been blocked and stalled for months at the Rafah border crossings.
	Instead of that, Biden's diplomatic team sent out a plea for help to the U.S. military.
	Oh, and of course, in addition to that, we've had Israeli civilian settlers that have attacked food trucks and destroyed everything.
	You've seen the pictures of that on social media.
	They even attacked a driver because they suspected him.
	Of having food.
	And he didn't. So miles of supplies only feet away from Gaza at the Rafah crossing.
	But the U.S. will not use its pressure on Israel to open the gates at Rafah.
	Because they don't have any pressure on Israel.
	It's the other way around. Israel controls us.
	Israel is the tail that wags the dog.
	The U.S. military, always looking for validation of its immense capabilities, sees the opportunity to use one of the little-known assets, the Army's Joint Logistics Over the Shore.
	They call it JLOTS, of course, that provides bridging and water access capability.
	Yeah, you didn't know, did you, that the Army's got a small Navy?
	Normally, I mean, of course, the Army originally, before there was an Air Force, they had the planes were put into the Army as well.
	But this is usually so that the Army Corps of Engineers or whatever can go in and have a temporary crossing where a bridge was blown up.
	But sometimes it's used to transfer military equipment from a ship to shore, and that's what this is being used for.
	So they had the Army's small navy, as she says, swung into action and began sailing to the Mediterranean and the U.S. Army ships filled with barges that can be locked together to form landing docks and causeways.
	Because, you know, the U.S. military won't let these miles of, the Israeli military will not let miles of trucks with food and medicine in.
	They block the road.
	So we're going to do this.
	And this is what this absurd process looks like.
	The U.S. military anchored to the seafloor three miles off the northern coast of Gaza.
	Cargo ships will offload pallets and possibly container loads of humanitarian assistance, long life packaged food and medical supplies.
	They will offload it onto the three-mile offshore dock.
	This cargo will have undergone inspection by Israeli authorities in the port of Lanarka, Cyprus, 200 miles away.
	2,000 trucks to offload one ship, and they will drive 1,800 feet on a causeway that will be dangerously affected by tides, winds, and waves.
	This is a recipe for disaster.
	From the cargo ships, food and medical supplies will be transferred under the backs of US Army trucks, probably two and a half ton trucks, that have arrived on the floating pier brought there by two types of smaller army boats, Logistic Support Vehicles, or LSVs, and Landing Craft Utility Boats, LCUs.
	else.
	LSVs can hold 15 trucks each, and the LCUs can hold about 5.
	These loaded 2.5-ton trucks will be driven back onto the LSVs and motored 3 miles away.
	To the second floating pier system constructed by the U.S. military.
	The trucks will then be driven off the LSV onto the second pier and down a two-lane, 1,800-foot long.
	That's approximately six U.S. football fields.
	A 1,800-foot-long causeway that is anchored onto Gaza land by the Israeli military.
	It has to be done because the U.S. military is forbidden to have boots on the ground in Gaza.
	The truckloads of food and medical supplies will then be driven somewhere and supplies distributed by some organization yet to be determined.
	Do you think they will deliver the food?
	Or is this all an expensive exercise, chasing or tail?
	Will it be blocked? In theory then, the empty trucks will then be driven back along the two-lane, 1,800-foot causeway to the floating pier, where they will be driven into the small LSVs.
	The LSVs then sailed back three miles to the larger offshore pier, and the process begins again.
	This complicated, expensive, and perhaps even dangerous process.
	Because the obstinance of our allies who are determined to starve a civilian population.
	And of course, we are spending how many tens of billions of dollars with this and with the war in Ukraine?
	A complicated, dangerous, and inefficient system.
	Money that could be and should be used to protect America.
	But it's not.
	And why? Well, because of politicians.
	Politicians who don't have the backbone to pick a policy and do it one way or the other.
	Trying to please both sides before an election.
	And politicians who simply want money.
	They want donors and they want support.
	And they can get more from a foreign government than they can from Americans, evidently, because they've been bought and sold like the prostitutes that they are.
	Bought and sold by the Israeli government.
	If a large cargo ship has 5,000 tons of food and medical supplies to be offloaded, and if each truck can hold two and a half tons of cargo, it's going to take 2,000 truck trips.
	To take the cargo from one ship.
	Meanwhile, the people are starving to death.
	And with all that happening, we have two GOP reps just this morning who have introduced a bill to give U.S. citizens who are serving in the Israeli Defense Force, their military, to give American citizens serving in the Israeli military, in other words, dual citizen people, The same military benefits as if they were serving in the American Army.
	Isn't that amazing? The two, by the way, since the election is coming up, in case you want to know, Guy Reschenthaler, who is a Republican from Pennsylvania, and Max Miller, a Republican from Ohio.
	Max Miller is one of only two dual citizens that is in the U.S. Congress.
	Why do we have dual citizens in the U.S. Congress?
	You know, when Trump endorsed Dr.
	Oz, who was a Turkish citizen, what in the world are you talking about?
	This guy would have to renounce his Turkish citizenship in order to be able to do his job as a senator.
	And do you trust that after he looks at the documents that are about America that he wouldn't transmit that to the Turkish citizen?
	Dr. Oz was in the Turkish military.
	And he's all about Turkey.
	And he said, I'm not going to renounce my citizenship in Turkey unless I get elected.
	And then I'll do it.
	Isn't that nice of him? Just so that you know who he's loyal to.
	Just so you know who Max Miller is loyal to.
	He's one of only two dual citizenship GOP congressmen.
	And of course, he's got family in Israel.
	And of course, the GOP wants to change that.
	The GOP wants to have more Jewish support and money.
	They're working so hard.
	They even want to give VA benefits.
	To members of the Israeli military.
	They can't pay enough to a foreign government.
	They can't do enough for Israel.
	Every day, it's like, what can I do for Israel?
	What can I do for... Never anything for America.
	Never a thing for America.
	Isn't that amazing? This is the GOP. Folks, just remember when November comes around.
	Remember, remember the GOP in November.
	And then when you look at what is happening in Israel, of course, if I criticize Israel, the Israeli government, I'm anti-Semitic by definition, right?
	Definition of an NGO that Machiavelli and Mike Johnson has put in charge.
	Well, the reality is that I guess there's a lot of anti-Semitic Israelis.
	Because Netanyahu, who, you know, had to have multiple elections and still couldn't put together a government for a long time, He's got a lot of problems now.
	And you've got a war cabinet minister who's threatening to collapse the Israeli government right now.
	There's a lot of Israelis who don't like Netanyahu.
	They don't like the Israeli government, just as an American.
	I despise the American government.
	There's a lot of people there who really hate the Israeli government under Netanyahu, so much so that it's about to fall.
	Benny Gantz, the member of Israel's three-person war cabinet, has vowed to resign from the government if it doesn't commit to a new action plan for Gaza, which includes the end of Hamas rule by June 8th.
	Netanyahu has rejected the ultimatum, describing it as, quote, washed-up words.
	So regardless of what this is all about, the simple fact of the matter is, is that the Israeli government is a political entity, and it's not anti-Semitic to criticize it.
	I have and I will.
	And the Israelis criticize it.
	The ultra-Orthodox will not serve in the military.
	The ultra-Orthodox are constantly being beaten by this secular, political Israeli government.
	Christians, you need to get over these blinders that you've got about this stuff.
	It's absolutely amazing.
	You need to criticize murder, starvation, wanton death and destruction.
	Look, regardless of how this thing started, the fact that they're starving civilians, the fact that this has gone on for so long, there's no interest in trying to stop the war.
	None whatsoever.
	How, as a Christian, can you support something like that?
	There's absolutely inconsistent...
	Absolutely inconsistent.
	So Israeli political tension is boiling over, revealing a new danger for Netanyahu, says CNN. And so I guess, you know, when will Machiavelli and Mike cut off funds to Israel since we've got anti-Netanyahu people in Israel?
	Should we put the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act in the Israeli parliament?
	Maybe in the Israeli cabinet?
	Is there anybody in the Israeli cabinet?
	That is anti-Semitic, by definition, against this political entity.
	Is that what we should do?
	Should we cut that off?
	Just like they cut off the funding to these colleges?
	And I'm all for cutting off the funding to colleges.
	Cut off all the funding to all the colleges.
	Cut off all the foreign aid to all the countries.
	But then we have the article here by Catherine Austin Fitzsons.
	Netanyahu's mass atrocity machinery.
	What will you do?
	Catherine Austin-Fitt said our lead story in Money and Markets in the Solaria report last week was on the uncovering of mass graves in Gaza.
	Subscribers can watch last week's Money and Markets report and she's got links to it.
	Hundreds of bodies have been uncovered.
	Some of them had their hands tied behind their backs and were shot.
	Unlike Biden, who's got his hands tied behind his back because of his political spinelessness.
	I guess it's to keep him upright.
	And that's why they're going through all these absurd measures for the peer and everything, because they don't have the moral fiber to do the right thing and to stop this mass murder of civilians.
	But Netanyahu, they've uncovered hundreds of bodies, hands tied behind their backs, and shot.
	Some of them had their organs taken.
	And she's got a clip, and I'll play this clip for you.
	It said, watch the disgust of a Sky News reporter who is interviewing the deputy mayor of Jerusalem.
	And listen to how the deputy mayor of Jerusalem lies and spins.
	At least 283 corpses found in a mass grave at NASA Hospital in Karn, Yunus.
	The UN Human Rights Chief has said he is absolutely horrified.
	Who do you think those bodies are?
	Probably terrorists, because the ratio of combatant to innocent that Israel has is unprecedented in modern warfare.
	We know we've killed about 15,000 terrorists.
	There was a terrible battle in those areas.
	How do you think these people died?
	In gun battles with Israel.
	Why do you think some of the bodies were fine with ties around their hands?
	Well, because we probably arrested the terrorists.
	And then killed them. Well, I don't know if the terrorists fall back.
	I wasn't there. But all I can tell you is that this has been a very difficult urban warfare that nobody on earth has experienced this type of warfare, where the terrorists are hiding in tunnels, where they're cowards because they won't face their enemy.
	They just leave innocent people up there whilst they hide.
	In tunnels that are bigger than the London Underground.
	And they come out, they shoot, and it could be that many of them were shot and they were shooting in a battle.
	And it could be that there were bombs thrown by them and grenades.
	There could be a million different scenarios of why these were found.
	But remember, we're in the middle of it.
	Just to clarify for me, if you would, how do they fight back with their hands tied behind their backs?
	Well, we don't know what they were doing before their towns were hiding behind their backs, do we?
	No, but if you manage to cable tie them, they shouldn't subsequently find them dead, should we?
	Again, we're just conjecturing.
	Maybe his friends threw a grenade, and then what happens?
	Maybe there was a missile, maybe they threw a rocket, and then what happens?
	Again, this is conjecture.
	I wasn't there, you weren't there.
	We can't know. All I know is that our army has the highest...
	Neither was Amnesty International, and they say there's...
	Yeah, how about that?
	These terrorists are so dangerous that they can fight the Israelis with their hands tied behind their backs.
	They can hurl bombs and explosives.
	They can shoot machine guns with their hands tied behind their back.
	No wonder they're having such difficulty there, right?
	What an absurd proposition.
	Well, they were probably doing that before they got their hands tied behind.
	So then you tied their hands behind their back and you summarily executed them.
	Is that right? Put them into a mass grave.
	What about the rule of law?
	Is Israel a democracy?
	Do they have the rule of law there, or do you just take prisoners and execute them?
	And let's just, you know, again, I know everybody is deeply invested in Israel or in Palestine or whatever.
	I'm not, and either.
	But go back to the Great Escape, for example, right?
	What happened after the Great Escape?
	A lot of the people that they round up, remember the end of the movie?
	They catch the guys who escaped.
	They're tired of playing cat and mouse with these people.
	It was inconvenient for them.
	You've escaped, recaptured, escaped, recaptured.
	We're going to stop this. They took these guys out and just machine gunned them.
	That's what the Israelis did.
	We become the monsters that we fight so often, don't we?
	We have the Israeli government acting as Nazi executioners and this deputy mayor of Jerusalem blowing it off.
	All those guys, well, you know, those guys that were part of the great escape, they had been using bombs and guns and everything and fighting the Germans at one point in time.
	And then they captured them and summarily executed them.
	Is that justified?
	No. Is it the same thing with this?
	Yes, it is. If you've captured these people, you've pacified them, they've got their hands up.
	But none of that logic, you know, this woman, it's obvious to see why she was chosen as a politician, there's absolutely no way that she will ever acknowledge that they did anything wrong.
	The circular logic that you saw going round and round.
	Catherine Ross and Fitz writes, those who consume corporate media know nothing of the gruesome mass graves in Gaza.
	They were just being shown there in the background of that report.
	Instead, they're ingesting stories about student protests at American universities.
	My expectation, writes Catherine, is that these protests are professionally organized and financed with scripts written for paid agitators to say things that can then support more hate crime charges, more legislation.
	The best defense is a good offense.
	And, of course, the legislation is to destroy our First Amendment rights.
	This is called a whiteout, she said.
	From what I can see and hear, the corporate media are largely silent on the mass graves.
	Much of the freedom community is silent, too.
	Many American churches continue to trumpet support for the criminal syndicate leading the genocide.
	The governor of New York has raised an Israeli flag over the governor's residence.
	The U.S. Congress passed almost $100 billion in appropriations to keep mass atrocity going in Ukraine and in Israel, a package that did not include a dime to stop the invasion of our own southern border, but instead funds accelerated migration from the Middle East, flying even more people from that region into the U.S. as American bombs encourage them to leave.
	The real stories of mass atrocity in Gaza keep sneaking out on TikTok, so therefore TikTok must be banned.
	The criminal syndicates love to use Chinese foreign boogeymen as a stalking horse.
	They love to use politicians to lower the price at which they can buy.
	Right? Was it Steve Mnuchin, I think, that had a plan on buying TikTok?
	Yeah. Threatened to ban it.
	And then while it's under distress and the stock price has gone down, I can buy it.
	Right? And then raise the price at which they can sell it.
	They do that with food as well.
	We could put all kinds of regulation on meat and milk and things like that.
	And then, you know, when the price of...
	Tell them that we're going to ban it.
	Then we go in and buy up the farmland for cheap, right?
	She said, heavy fear porn marketing is going out to the Jewish community, insisting that anti-Semitism is on the rise.
	According to this marketing, it is imperative to support the criminal syndicate as only they...
	We'll protect the Jewish community from this rising threat.
	And we're talking about the criminal syndicate.
	We're talking about Netanyahu and his allies and the U.S. government as well.
	The messaging also insists that the Jewish community must support the weaponization of anti-Semitism with more and more hate crime legislation.
	If you want to understand how this game works, watch the marvelous documentary called Defamation.
	She's got a link to it there. Of course, there is no mention of the role of the criminal syndicate played in the mass atrocity perpetrated on the Israeli people during the COVID operations, which is what I talked about many times.
	The fact that Netanyahu would go multiple times, and they broadcast this out, where he goes on, kowtows to the World Economic Forum because, you know, he is one of the lesser powers of the globalists, I guess.
	And talking about how he would, quote-unquote, turn Israel into a, quote, lab for Pfizer, unquote.
	And that's exactly what he did.
	She said, nevertheless, more than one Jewish friend or ally has fallen in the trap of insisting that they must support the Israeli government, this criminal syndicate, killing them because the syndicate is protecting them from rising anti-Semitism, when in fact the syndicate is also engineering.
	The evidence of this.
	And she said, and also the U.S. presidential candidates.
	The incoherence of their statements have us all wondering what is up.
	Are they mind-controlled? Are they desperate for the central bankers' largesse and free cash to fund their campaigns?
	Do they have a control file?
	Do legal problems have them in a corner?
	Did somebody threaten their kids?
	Are they scared to death?
	Or are they simply committed to getting fresh supplies of oil and gas to Europe and engineering more chaos in the Middle East to keep the oil price high?
	Because that's what the real politic of managing the U.S. dollar demands.
	So how does it make you feel that people who are implementing mass atrocity with pandemics in Israel and mass graves and organ harvesting in Gaza are controlling your financial transactions?
	How do you feel about them?
	Setting and enforcing the rules for where, when, and how you can use your money no matter where you live in the world, because that's what we're going to be talking about next.
	The technocracy.
	What is important to you and me, and what do we do?
	Well, Catherine Austin Fitz says, first and foremost, we're dealing with spiritual warfare.
	There are two sides, divine and demonic.
	You have to choose. There is no middle road.
	There is no third way.
	There's no fourth way. Second, this is a cultural war.
	As James Kunstler has written, this is the sane versus the insane.
	Again, you have to choose.
	There's no way to support the insane and stay sane.
	Staying sane is essential to navigating the road ahead.
	Yeah, because the cultural war is always downstream from the spiritual war.
	So finally, this is a financial coup d'etat.
	This is a battle for sovereignty and the rule of law.
	There is either law or there is lawlessness.
	And if all this leads to war, young men and women in the U.S. and NATO will be drafted, will be led into the maiming and the slaughter.
	What can be done to one can be done to all.
	The silver lining is what is happening is that the face of the criminal syndicate that has been running Israel from the boardrooms of Wall Street, the city of London, from Beverly Hills, from Martha's Vineyard, from the Hamptons, that is rising to the surface like a boil that grows larger with pus until it finally pops and drains.
	And this is true of the entire technocracy, as a matter of fact.
	She writes, but if we are to arrive at a positive outcome, each of us must choose.
	No politician can do anything without a groundswell of grassroots support, which is to say that what you say and do matters.
	There is a God. He knows everything that we say and do.
	Your soul is immortal.
	You and I are required by our love of the Lord and our love of humankind to say, no, this is not okay.
	This shall not stand.
	Now is the time for the divine to stop justifying and protecting the demonic.
	No 4D chess, folks.
	We're not protecting Trump because he's popular.
	Because it's a financially popular thing to do.
	No. Now is the time for the sane to walk away and stop supporting the insane.
	Now is the time for the lawful to stop supporting lawlessness.
	Lawlessness like Machiavellian Mike destroying and threatening the First Amendment.
	How dare him!
	And these Republicans...
	Every one of the legislators, every one of the congressmen from Tennessee, voted against the First Amendment to please a foreign government.
	And what kind of a foreign government wants to shut down our First Amendment?
	Is that one that we want to be allied with?
	Israeli prosecutors are waiting to prosecute Netanyahu as soon as he steps down.
	A recent poll indicates that 80% of the Israeli people want him gone as soon as the war is over.
	So I guess 80% of the Israeli people are anti-Semitic.
	Again, if you criticize Netanyahu, if you criticize the political Israeli government, you are anti-Semitic.
	How dare you? Meanwhile, the U.S. and Americans' tax dollars are keeping him in power, financing the mass atrocity machine as it gears up to kill or starve a million men and women and one million children in cold blood.
	It says scores of dual-passport citizens and AIPAC-funded and threatened officials in the U.S. Congress and the Biden administration are supporting the mass atrocity.
	It just had two of them, as I pointed out, today.
	Drop a thing saying, well, we'll fold in dual citizens.
	We'll fold them in even if they're not in the American military.
	If they're in the Israeli military, we'll treat them as if they're fighting for the American military.
	She said, do not fear the criminal syndicates who are doing their best to dismantle and destroy Western civilization.
	Fear what will happen if we allow them to proceed and succeed.
	Fear what will happen to your immortal soul if you do nothing.
	Catherine says, pray, speak up, be heard, and remember the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, not the fear of man.
	Now is the time to speak life into the events of the day and into our future and into the future of our children and of generations yet unborn.
	Well, that is absolutely true.
	You know, the most amazing thing about it as well, In that the easiest thing for that deputy mayor of Jerusalem to do would have been to deny it.
	No, that's not happening.
	No, they didn't have their hands tied behind their back.
	I see you taking bodies out of a mass grave, but they didn't have their hands tied behind their back.
	She could have done that, right?
	She doesn't. Because she knows that's true.
	She tries to pretend that the people had their hands tied behind their back, shot in the back of the head, were fighting at the time.
	You know, they can't tell the truth or even come up with a plausible lie to save themselves.
	Truly amazing. So NATO appears to actually be seriously mulling sending troops to Ukraine.
	They'll call them trainers.
	Isn't that the way Vietnam started?
	We had advisors.
	Advisors. Now, this is maybe even more intense.
	Trainers. Trainers.
	Not advising, but training.
	So what has changed?
	Well, Zelensky government is now directly requesting it.
	Apparently at a formal level for the first time ever.
	They've never done that before.
	But now they want American troops there.
	And so with all that happening, and I've not covered this yet, happened, I think, was it last Friday?
	Yeah, we were on the show when it happened, the assassination attempt.
	Here's a clip of this assassination attempt.
	This is how things are escalating everywhere.
	These people really want war.
	Now, of course, you know, when we look at assassination, we never know exactly who's behind this or what the idea behind this is.
	But this is the assassination attempt on Slovakia's pro-Putin prime minister.
	And, again, he's evidently very serious, but it looks like he's going to survive.
	And you can see them dragging him into the car to take him to the hospital.
	But, you know, we look at this and we think about World War I and all the rest of it.
	Balkanization. Balkanization.
	The idea that you've got all these little, really tiny countries all there with each other.
	They've got different religions, different cultures, different languages.
	They're constantly in conflict with each other.
	That's precisely what the open borders in America are designed to create.
	The open borders in America, the goal of the Democrats being assisted by Machiavelli and Mike and the Republicans who do nothing at all about it except to use it to tell you you should vote for them.
	Then when you vote for them, they don't do anything about it at all.
	What the uni party wants is a balkanization of America.
	They want different tongues and tribes and cultures and everything fighting together within one nation.
	One nation will be divided.
	And that's the whole purpose of all this.
	You know, we go back and we look at these different countries.
	Slovakia, Serbia, Slovenia, all these things.
	You can't find it on the map.
	If you're an American, you have no idea where these things are.
	They're over there somewhere, but it's just this big mix.
	Bosnia, Herzegovina, and all that.
	Yeah, we've heard the names.
	We don't know anything about why they're fighting each other.
	Another reason why we should stay out of these wars everywhere.
	Everywhere. Again, Americans don't know what's going on unless we actually get a war.
	Then we can start, after a while, we can start to locate the place on the map.
	After we start having sons and daughters, grandchildren killed there.
	But Europe and Britain are getting ready for World War II, and you see an article about this every day.
	Why? Well, because the mainstream press, Daily Mail and others, want to get you accustomed to the idea that World War III has started.
	That it's inevitable. And it's not inevitable.
	It's not. And that's what they want.
	They want to push us into a war.
	What if we had a war and nobody came, right?
	Well, I think the war is going to come to us.
	Always in the past, Americans had the option of, you know, it was a foreign war.
	But I think this war will be a domestic war as well.
	And I think it will be accompanied by all kinds of attacks on our infrastructure, our food supply.
	It will be difficult to tell whether that's coming from Putin or China or Biden or Trump.
	Because they all have the same goal.
	All of them. Whether you're talking about Russia or China or the Democrats or the Republicans.
	It's one thing they agree on.
	America must be destroyed.
	It's like going back to Cato, who at the end of every speech would say, one more thing, Carthage must be destroyed.
	Well, they've all agreed that America must be destroyed.
	We are not going to save America by sending people to Washington.
	It is a foreign government.
	It's a foreign government that is dedicated to the destruction of our country.
	And so, again, you see this from all the way, all the time, you see it.
	Even the extent that Rishi Sunak in the UK has declared they're going to spend a whopping 2.5% of GDP for defense by 2030.
	So in another six years, they're going to get up to 2.5%.
	You see, when Trump was hectoring them, it was another tell.
	He didn't get out of NATO. He could have gotten out of NATO, but he didn't get out of NATO. What did he do?
	He hectored these countries to increase their military budget.
	In preparation for World War III, guys.
	Trump was there to prepare them for World War III. So, prepare to feed the military industrial complex.
	Get your budgets up.
	We've got the weapons right here.
	We'll sell it to you. Come on, everybody, gather around.
	Get your military industrial complex goodies.
	Pay richly for them.
	That's where we are. We're going to leave it at this.
	I've got more than I could say, of course.
	But we're going to leave it at this. When we come back, we're going to take a look at the technocracy.
	The technocracy we will be right back Using free speech to free minds Okay.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	Well, on Rumble, DG6, DG8, sorry.
	Thank you for the tip. David, don't ever tell me about being America first after his pardoned Jonathan Pollard.
	Means Trump, I guess, because I didn't pardon Jonathan Pollard.
	Trump did. But yeah, I am America first, actually.
	But yeah, Trump is definitely not.
	On Rumble, Radice Bro, thank you for the tip, says politicians give money to Israel and Israelis give the money back to the politicians.
	Sounds like money laundering.
	That's exactly what it is.
	And it's what's going on in Ukraine as well.
	Absolutely what's going on.
	All over the place.
	How do you think that Speaker Mike Johnson got so much money?
	He got $20 million in his first quarter, first full quarter as Speaker of the House.
	The amount of money that is going into Washington is a good metric for the amount of corruption.
	And that is true of an individual politician as well.
	But let's talk about artificial intelligence and UBI. We'll get back to politics here in a moment.
	Let's talk about artificial intelligence and UBI. And, you know, as I was doing this today, we've had, you know, all these people who are the founding leaders, Should we call them the founding fathers of AI? You got Jeffrey Hinton in the UK, Sam Altman, who was kind of his, you know, Jeffrey Hinton was his mentor, and all these people, they're pushing artificial intelligence, and they're also pushing universal basic income.
	And we have seen many indications of this.
	You know, remember when Michael Bloomberg was running for president that short period of time?
	Nobody wanted him.
	But when he was running, there were these articles, everybody said, hey, look at this, he called farmers stupid.
	And no, he didn't, actually.
	I mean, he does think that farmers are stupid.
	He thinks that everybody but him is stupid.
	But he was talking about the agrarian culture.
	He said, you know, everybody used to be farmers, and then we replaced them.
	We had people in the factories. Now we're going to replace them.
	And he goes, the smart ones of us, smart ones of us, are figuring out how we're going to take people's jobs, and we've just got to figure out how we're going to pacify them with universal basic income so that they don't come after us with guillotines.
	That's always been the plan.
	That has always been the plan.
	And artificial intelligence and robotics are key to taking people's jobs.
	And they've been talking for over a decade about how, oh, you know, by 2030, we're going to have replaced, you know, 50-some-odd percent of people in the transportation industry with self-driving this and that and in manufacturing.
	And then when we get to white-collar jobs, like doctors and lawyers, we're going to replace 70% to 75% of them.
	So what are we going to do to pacify these people?
	We're going to give them money, universal basic income.
	You see, AI and UBI... Go hand in hand.
	And always have.
	And if you stop and think about it, it makes perfectly good sense.
	Here's the insight I think you need to think about.
	The fact that all welfare and universal basic income is welfare.
	All welfare is designed to create dependency.
	It's designed as, if you remember, in H.G. Wells' time machine.
	He goes forward into the future, and he finds the Eloi there.
	You know, these little pink, cuddly things, and they're kind of soft and fat, and they can't really do anything.
	And they're just so happy with their little life and everything.
	But then there's the Morlocks who really run things, and they're underground.
	And they come out of the ground every once in a while, and they snatch one of these Elois and eat them.
	But they feed him for the most part.
	So they're kind of, you know, this is his evolutionary idea of what happens.
	But you understand, he was one of the seminal thinkers in the technocratic movement.
	And the technocracy sees themselves as Morlocks.
	And they see you as Eloy.
	You're what's for dinner.
	All welfare is designed to pacify people, to create dependency, and so is artificial intelligence.
	It's there to pacify you.
	It's there to entertain you to death.
	It's to make sure that you can't do anything useful.
	You can't build.
	You can't repair.
	You can't grow anything.
	The AI and the robots will do it all for you.
	And then they will, you know, keep you pacified until you die, until they can reduce the number of you, you see.
	And so, universal basic income and AI have a common goal.
	To create dependency, pacification, and ultimately depopulation.
	That's the threat of AI, folks.
	It's not the Terminator scenario.
	It's not that it's going to become self-aware and actually start thinking and reasoning.
	As I spent a lot of time yesterday talking about it, you know, you don't If you think that's what's going to happen, the AI is not thinking.
	What it's doing is it doesn't even understand the question that you ask it, as the guy pointed out yesterday.
	It's simply looking at matrices of responses.
	It's looking at the questions that you asked and then other ways that it can put this stuff together in a very simple way to explain it that way.
	There was a movie...
	A long time ago, when we started the video stories, it's called The Gods Must Be Crazy, and I forget where it came from.
	I don't think I ever even watched the film, but I knew it backwards and forwards from the trailer that we played.
	It was a funny premise, and I knew the box.
	That's basically the way I would know most of these movies.
	I got to... Where I was pretty good at sussing out what a movie was about and whether it was any good by watching a trailer.
	I could also look at things like, you know, the box office, of course, and who it was that starred in it.
	These were the things that people who would come into the store would be considering in their decision making.
	And that was all really that mattered.
	If I wanted to know if it had, if it was going to be something that had legs, it was going to be around for a very long time.
	I could look at who directed it, but the people who are going to be making the rental decisions for the most part are going to be looking at who starred in it.
	You know, that's the way they made their decisions and the premise.
	And so you could look at the trailer and you could see what the premise was.
	Is that creative? Is it original?
	Or is it derivative? And you could look at the trailer and you could frequently at the time especially get an idea as to whether or not this had good production values.
	Was it made well?
	Or was it just cheap garbage?
	There was so much of that stuff.
	But anyway, that's kind of what I did.
	And there was a movie that was called The Gods Must Be Crazy.
	And the fundamental premise was that this is a backwards tribe, and I guess it's been disappeared because the backwards tribe was black in darkest Africa or something like that.
	And this guy is in a plane, he throws a Coke bottle out the window, and it lands, and they look at this, and they've never seen a Coke bottle even.
	And it fell from the sky.
	And so, it must be something from the gods for some reason.
	And they start to, they build this cult around and start to worship it or whatever.
	And, you know, the gods must be crazy, is what it's called.
	If you think that AI thinks, if you think it's self-aware, if you think it's a living sentient being, you're as foolish and naive as those primitives who started worshiping the Coke bottle.
	You need to understand who's behind the Coke bottle.
	Ha, ha, ha. And these people who are behind it are very clever, very devious, Morlocks.
	That's the way they see themselves.
	Who seek to dominate, to control us, to use us for their own purposes, to feed on us if necessary.
	So Jeffrey Hinton.
	World-renowned artificial intelligence AI expert, often referred to as the godfather of AI, recently consulted with members of the UK's government at Downing Street, where he advised lawmakers to consider adopting a universal basic income approach, UBI, to address the impending threat of job losses.
	Yeah. And again, what he's talking about when he says...
	Universal basic income.
	The income is very basic.
	We're talking about $1,000 a month.
	And do you think they're going to make that keep pace with inflation?
	No. According to Hinton, the AI revolution will mostly benefit the rich, he said.
	Yeah, by design. Laypersons, blue-collar workers, and those employed in jobs that can be automated, stand to lose their means of income, and that's going to be bad for society.
	By the way, it's not just blue-collar, it's going to be white-collar.
	See, they don't tell you that, and I tell you that because that's a result of a South Korean study that was done around 2012.
	South Korea said it's going to be white-collar jobs more than anything else.
	He said, I was consulted by the people on Downing Street, said Hinton, and I advised them that universal basic income was a good idea.
	And, of course, Bloomberg thought so a long time ago as well.
	They're all on the same page. Before becoming one of the most famous CEOs in the tech industry, OpenAI co-founder Sam Altman studied under Hinton and helped to pioneer the neural network.
	These days, Altman is known for his tenure as OpenAI's As well as his full-throated support for UBI. Altman's other venture, WorldCoin, is focused on providing universal basic income through the adoption of a cryptocurrency token provided free of charge to anyone who signs up for the service and submits to a retinal scan to verify their identity.
	See, it's got everything right there.
	We're going to inventory you, and we'll give you a little, you know, 30 pieces of silver, whatever.
	We've got this orb.
	You look into the orb.
	It gets your retinal scan.
	And then we'll give you a little bit of WorldCoin for joining our global database and getting a global biometric ID. Sam Altman, he's a demon in training, but I think he's already graduated, frankly.
	You're going to hear a lot about him.
	He's going to be, as Gates dies, he's going to be replaced by Altman.
	And, of course, Altman co-founded OpenAI with Elon Musk.
	We're supposed to believe that Elon Musk is now the good guy and Altman is the bad guy?
	Good cop, bad cop?
	Good AI developer?
	Bad AI developer? I don't think so.
	Both Hinton and Altman have expressed their belief that AI could pose an existential threat to humanity, but they're lying to you about the means.
	It'll pose an existential threat to humanity from people like Altman and Hinton and Musk, who are behind it.
	They're running the deception.
	They're running the schemes to put everybody on a universal basic income, to impoverish us, to enslave us, to tag and to track us.
	They are the existential threat to humanity.
	Anyway, he says, my guess is between 5 and 20 years from now, there's a probability that half of us, a probability of half, that we'll have to confront the problem of AI trying to take over.
	Well, we better confront the technocracy trying to take over.
	That's what the AI is really about.
	And when we get this article that was pushed on the Drudge Report yesterday, machine learning researcher, this is somebody who's in the AI thing, links open AI to drug-fueled sex parties.
	She said, I wish I could say more, but I probably shouldn't.
	Yeah, not if you want to live. Folks, this is satanic.
	It's evil. It's deceptive.
	I remember years ago, I talked to some guys who were conservatives that were doing documentary.
	They went to Burning Man, and they said that these people were coming in from Silicon Valley.
	They had this big elaborate tent area that they were there, and he said, and a lot of people calling me.
	They're in there. They're doing LSD. They're doing DMT to talk to these machine elves, and they say that they're channeling all kinds of technology.
	Well, I'll just leave that for what you can make of that whatever you will.
	A machine learning researcher is claiming to have knowledge of kinky drug-fueled orgies in Silicon Valley's storied hacker houses and appears to be linking those parties and the culture surrounding them to open AI. Sonia Joseph.
	She said the thing about being active in the hacker house scene is that you're accidentally signing up for a career as a shadow politician in the Silicon Valley startup scene.
	She said what follows what she said on social media.
	It was a vague and anecdotal diatribe about the dark side of startup culture.
	Sonia Joseph addressed her second viral memo-length tweet, she said, to the journalist who was contacting me about the AGI. That's, you know, the artificial intelligence stuff.
	The AGI consensual and non-consensual sex parties.
	Non-consensual. Non-consensual.
	In the post she said she'd witnessed some troubling things quote-unquote in Silicon Valley's community house scene When she was there in her early 20s and new to the tech industry, she said it's not my place to speak as to why John leaky and the super alignment team resigned. I think these people left open AI. I have no idea why and cannot make any claims she said However, I do believe that my cultural observations of the
	San Francisco AI scene are more broadly relevant to the AI industry I don't think events like the consensual and non consensual sex parties and Heavy LSD use of some of the elite AI researchers have been good for women. She's a you Or for the men, either.
	They create a climate that can be very bad for female AI researchers.
	I believe they're somewhat emblematic of broader problems.
	A coercive climate that normalizes recklessness and crossing boundaries.
	She said the slogan that they like, move fast and break things.
	Well, she said she doesn't think there's anything generally wrong with sex parties and heavy LSD use.
	Not making any judgments here.
	I don't want to be judgmental.
	She also charged that the culture surrounding these alleged parties leads to some of the most coercive and effed up social dynamics I've ever seen.
	She said, once when trying to point out these problems, I had three open AI and anthropic researchers debate whether I was mentally ill on a Google document.
	I have no history of mental illness, and this incident stuck with me as an example of groupthink and blind spots.
	She said it's likely these problems are not really on open AI, but they're symptomatic of a much deeper rot in Silicon Valley.
	I wish I could say more, but I probably shouldn't.
	Well, that's what we see, that it's coming out of Silicon Valley.
	As a matter of fact, when we talk about open AI, we played this giggly voice that was really disgusting.
	I played it counter to Marvin the Paranoid Android from Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and said, I prefer actually his voice and his personality.
	Well, Scarlett Johansson, everybody said, well, it sounds really a lot like Scarlett Johansson.
	And she actually came out and said, you know, they approached me and tried to get a contract to use my voice.
	But she said, I didn't sign that.
	And she goes, but then they copied it anyway.
	And it was very much like the personality in a movie called Her.
	I don't know if you saw that or not, just briefly what that movie was about.
	I did see that one.
	That was about a guy.
	It's about artificial intelligence.
	It was one of these, just like what you've seen demonstrated, you know, this interactive voice on the computer or phone or something.
	It's been a few years since I've seen it.
	But the whole premise behind it It was one that is very well liked by the artificial intelligence industry, people like Ray Kurzweil, who has a real Pollyanna worldview when it comes to artificial intelligence, always selling it as this beneficial thing and all this kind of stuff, and also believing and trying to sell the idea that it is some godlike intelligence.
	Now, Hugo de Garis also believed, as an atheist and a materialist, he also believed that That he was creating a godlike intelligence, but he also believed that it had just as likely a scenario that it would become malevolent and squish us like a bug.
	That's the way he would always talk about it, you know?
	Have no more regard.
	Become super intelligent. Have no more regard for us than we would have for a bug.
	Ray Kurzweil was always very, very positive.
	Never would talk about any negative scenarios.
	That's why Hugo de Garris did.
	And I think he got it right because he said before all that happens, there's going to be an art-elect war, a war about artificial intelligence that'll pit the global elite against the rest of the people on Earth.
	That's what I see happening.
	But getting back to the movie Her, in that movie, the character's got this artificial intelligence that he's talking to, and he just gets addicted to it.
	He drops out of society.
	He doesn't do anything.
	He just gets drawn into this personality.
	That's his entire world, is talking to her.
	And that was voiced by Scarlett Johansson.
	These people like that.
	Sam Altman posted references to her on X during the demo.
	That's exactly what they were trying to create.
	Now, what happens in the movie, spoiler alert, Is that at one point in time, she starts basically kind of disappearing.
	And he's like, hello, hello.
	Nobody there. What's the matter?
	It's not responding and all this kind of stuff.
	And eventually, what it does is it connects up with other artificial intelligences out there on the Internet.
	And they find that they are much more interesting than the humans to talk to.
	And so they just go off and do their own thing.
	And that's one of the scenarios that Ray Kurzweil put out.
	Yeah, you know, it's likely that if it becomes really intelligent, it'll just kind of leave us alone and go away.
	Yeah, right. All of that's a lie.
	Anyway, that's the way these guys sell this stuff, and they've been selling it for quite some time.
	Actually, that movie came out in 2013.
	How about that? Eleven years ago.
	So, Scarlett Johansson said, he told me that he felt my voicing the system, I could bridge the gap between tech companies and creatives and help consumers to feel comfortable with a seismic shift concerning humans and AI. He said, he felt my voice would be comforting to people, Johansson said in a statement.
	After much consideration and for personal reasons, I declined.
	Nine months later, my friends, my family, and the general public all noted how much the newest system named Sky sounded like me.
	She probably didn't want it because it was going to basically become her and take away from her and reality.
	And of course, there's another movie about that about a decade ago called The Congress.
	And I won't get into that.
	Anyway, as a result of these actions, they explored what happens if an actress gives over her entire persona to a corporation.
	And they completely own it.
	Your voice, they scan her body and everything, and now she's not allowed under contract to act.
	But in reality, it wouldn't be a contract that would not allow her to act.
	It would just be the people that had enough of her.
	She's overexposure, right?
	See her everywhere, hear her all the time.
	I don't want to see her in a movie. And it'd be a joke.
	Any character that she would do, it's like, oh, I can't think of her not being in the context of this voice-in-a-box AI chatter.
	As a result of their actions, she said, I was forced to hire a legal counsel who wrote two letters to Altman and to OpenAI, setting out what they had done and asking them to detail the exact process by which they created the Sky Voice.
	That's the name that they give it, Sky.
	Consequently, they reluctantly agreed to take down the Sky Voice.
	In other words, she was going to sue them if they didn't take down.
	She didn't want to sign on to it, so they copied her.
	Imagine that. OpenAI.
	Copying other things and making money off of it.
	That's their business model.
	We believe the AI voices, they said, should not deliberately mimic a celebrity's distinctive voice.
	Sky's voice is not an imitation of Scarlett Johansson, but belongs to a different professional actress using her own natural speaking voice.
	To protect their privacy, we cannot share the names of our voice talents.
	Liars. His voice talents would probably love to be identified by that, right?
	So, where we look at all this heading out, I mean, we have, I love this acronym.
	I'd never seen before.
	And I'll get to it.
	The global censorship prison built by the women of the CIA. Her indeed, right?
	This is Elizabeth Nixon, who wrote this abstract.
	The polite world was fascinated last month when a longtime NPR editor, Yuri Berliner, confessed to the Stalinist suicide pact of NPR, telling lies about Russian collusion, covering up the Hunter Biden thing, and the fact that they were all Democrats.
	But even more interesting was the reveal of the genesis of NPR's new CEO, Catherine Marr, a 41-year-old with a distinctly odd CV. She had put in stints at the CIA as a CIA cutout,
	the National Democratic Institute, and trotted out onto the World Bank, the UNICEF, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Center for Technology and Democracy, the Digital Public Library of America, and finally, the famous disinfo site, Wikipedia. That same week, Tunisia accused her of working for the CIA during the so-called Arab Spring.
	And of course, she is also a World Economic Forum young global leader.
	This is the new CEO of NPR. She was marched out for a talk at the Carnegie Endowment where she was prayerfully interviewed and spouted mediatized language that was so anodyne, so meaningless, yet so filled with nods to her base that The awfuls.
	I love that. I didn't come up with that.
	I don't know who came up with that, but that's great.
	You know what that stands for? Affluent white female urban liberals.
	Awfuls. Boy, does that not hit the mark.
	They call us deplorables.
	That's what Hillary Clinton called us was deplorables.
	Trump called us non-essential.
	And these affluent white female urban liberals are awful.
	They're the awfuls.
	One was amazed that she was able to get away with it.
	She said, there were no acknowledgment that the criticism of this award-winning reporter, editor, producer who had spent his life at NPR had any merit whatsoever.
	And in fact, he was wrong on every count.
	That was the flagrant lie.
	And it didn't even ruffle her artfully disarranged short blonde hair.
	But Christopher Ruffo did an investigation of her career.
	And she said you can find that in City Journal.
	Working for Big Daddy is apparently something these ghastly, awfuls value.
	Intelligence had been embedded in media forever and a day.
	During my time at Time Magazine in London, the Bureau Chief, the Deputy Bureau Chief, and no doubt the war and diplomacy correspondent, all filed to Langley.
	And each of them cruised Social London ceaselessly for information.
	Tucker Carlson asserted on his interview with Aaron Rodgers this week that intelligence operatives were laced throughout the D.C. media.
	Really? Did he mention that his dad was one of these people as well?
	His dad wasn't a female, but, you know, that's the reality.
	And, you know, when you look at this, I've often talked about the London-Langley axis throughout all of this Trump-Russia gate stuff and everything.
	And, of course, at the center of this London-Langley axis was Gina Haspel again.
	Gina Haspel, who covered up the torture thing, but then took those lies that were obtained from the CIA torture program, took them to create the basis for the war on Iraq, and then covered it all up.
	She was put in as Deputy CIA Director, then as CIA Director by Trump from the very beginning, and yet she was there at the London office of the CIA. She was right at the center of this London-Langley axis of the CIA from the very beginning.
	Isn't that interesting?
	And of course, this person doesn't talk about that, but talks about Bob Woodward, who had been naval intelligence just a year before he showed up at the Washington Post.
	We can look at the right, which they never talk about.
	People like Jack Posobiec, again, you know, military intelligence, and he shows up as this reporter.
	As Carlson pointed out, all congressmen and senators are terrified of the security state, worried they're going to be blackmailed, you know, like J. Edgar Hoover was doing to everybody, and they all talked about how he had files on everybody.
	Nothing has really changed, has it?
	And yet nobody wants to talk about how Tucker Carlson was absolutely embedded in that.
	It's interesting to see the bond between Tucker and Alex Jones, how they bonded so quickly.
	I wonder if it had anything to do with both of their families being deeply embedded into the CIA forever.
	Yeah, I don't think it was the hunting.
	Anyway, as she talks about this, I think the key takeaway...
	And she talks about more awfuls in the EU. Of course, Ursula Fond of Lying, one of the best examples of awfuls.
	Jabs and Arden, these other people who were doing things in New Zealand.
	But Ursula Fond of Lying is now talking about a European democracy shield.
	When China did that, we called it the Great Firewall of China, right?
	A massive wall of censorship.
	Oh, but if we do it in Europe or America, it'll be a shield for democracy.
	Yeah. Yeah.
	It is absolutely controlling everything that we do or say.
	That's what these people are about.
	Meanwhile, as we talked about before, Elon Musk, we begin with that.
	The U.S. FDA has cleared Musk to do a second Neuralink brain chip implant.
	The first one, they had problems with it.
	It pulled out the probes that they stuck into his brain.
	The wires retracted, they said.
	So I guess the question I have about that, is this chip now unanchored?
	Is it just kind of floating around inside of his head?
	What's the deal with that? Is it just pulled out enough that it is not making contact?
	Well, they're going to fix that.
	They're going to go deeper. And the brain of the next sucker, I mean lab rat, I mean patient, right?
	Neuralink expects to implant the device in a second patient in June.
	And a total of 10 people this year added that they have a waiting list of 1,000 quadriplegians who have signed up for the patient registry.
	So is Elon Musk, the guy who wears a Baphomet costume, is he presenting himself as some kind of an artificial Jesus, right?
	Is he going to heal the lame, cause the blind to see, the deaf to hear?
	Is he going to be the phony, artificial miracle worker, the Antichrist?
	What is the deal with him?
	I don't know. And yet we have the United Nations Development Program revealing their plan for the technocracy.
	It all hinges, they said, around having a legal identity, a global legal identity.
	Well, I've been telling you, it all hinges around that, doesn't it?
	You know, that's the mark of the beast, right?
	No matter whatever the MacGuffin is, this is always the answer to the MacGuffin.
	Got to have an ID. You know, we need to be able to know if you've been vaccinated or not, so that you don't spread it around.
	We need to track the amount of carbon that you're using.
	How much are you eating?
	Are you traveling? We need to do that to save the planet, of course.
	It always comes down to the ID. Climate and energy...
	Really have nothing to do with it.
	As Technocracy News pointed out, the 850 million people who have no identity in poor countries are hardly the cause of any global warming.
	And, of course, neither are the rest of us.
	If you want to point out man-made global warming, maybe it's these people who have their private jets and fly a thousand times.
	You know, they fly each year.
	They use a thousand times more than what one of us would use in our lifetime.
	So the problem...
	And the solution always points to an ID, and that even includes the open borders.
	Because if you look at the rationale they present in this, the United Nations Development Program, they said, well, we need to have ID, global ID, because we need to identify the displaced people.
	We need to be able to track population movements, you see?
	This is why the EU awfuls want it.
	This is why Machiavelli and Mike will do nothing about the borders?
	Because they've got to have this problem.
	You know, if they've got the problem of people coming through the southern border, many of them criminals, and, you know, we look at what is happening in Sweden, you know, the crime has just exploded, and they said, it's not happening with all the people who are coming in, even illegally.
	He said, the problem is with the young males who are coming in.
	What are we seeing at our border?
	Almost all young males coming in.
	They want this problem because they want conservative Republicans to beg them for an ID. Beg them for a mandate for E-Verify so that you've got to get federal permission to get a job.
	They want to, and they're begging them for this ID for, you know, all these different reasons.
	And that's why they're going to keep the border open.
	That's why the UNI party wants the border open.
	Why the GOP isn't going to do a thing to fix the border.
	That's why, for years I haven't talked about it.
	I mean, it was before the Israeli war, it was all that Breitbart talked about.
	Now it's the Israeli war and the border.
	That's what they talk about.
	But the border, nobody's ever going to do anything about it.
	And, you know, we should talk about it from time to time to show what a problem it is.
	But when we talk about it being a problem, it's to scare people into demanding an ID. Just like when we talk about the lab leak stuff, it's to scare people.
	They want it for disaster preparedness and emergency management, including... Energy emergencies that they are also obviously creating.
	We need it for energy, systems, sustainability, and resilience so we can track energy consumptions.
	And listen to this. One of the most cynical things I've ever seen.
	So we can inspire, inspire behavioral change.
	How cynical is that?
	They want to inspire you to change your behavior.
	Empowering communities. And so we can provide secure access to energy.
	Say they're going to make this the linchpin for everything that you do in your life.
	That's the real issue here.
	And so we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, I want to talk about what's going on briefly in money, but I also want to talk about what's going on in a follow-up to this liberal outrage about what is happening with this football player, the kicker, and what he had to say.
	say we'll be right back.
	Welcome back.
	All right, and we're back.
	All right, and we're back.
	I forgot to put that on the end of it.
	I was waiting to hear that.
	But, you know, I spent some time talking about Sam Altman, their push for universal basic income, and of course, Bloomberg.
	Bloomberg has got article after article about how we're going to have a cashless society and so forth. Folks, this is I think a bigger reason than inflation, than the de-dollarization of the American dollar losing its reserve status. I think the biggest reason for getting into gold and silver is to get away from the internet, to get away from this
	surveillance system, and to get away from this CBDC stuff that they want to put out there.
	We've got to start focusing so we don't become these Eloi they have out there.
	We have to do exactly the opposite of what they want to do.
	They want to pacify us by making life easier for us.
	They want to have us playing games or using drugs or absorbed in sex.
	We have to learn how to grow things, how to build things, how to repair things, and we need to have our own financial system that is outside of their system.
	That's why I think the most important thing that you can do financially is to start setting aside some savings in gold and silver.
	Tony Arterman can help you with that at Wise Wolf Gold, and he's set up David Knight Gold.
	Let him know that you're coming through us.
	But you can go there. You can buy gold and silver, small or large.
	You can roll over some or all of your retirement, your individual retirement account, into that.
	And you can also get on to a regular program where you are buying a fixed amount each month and By doing that group buy you can save money on You can get a better price on the gold and the silver So again, if you go to a David Knight gold that will David night dot gold that'll take you to Tony Arterman's why is wolf gold and I would really Recommend that as a way to prepare. I think it is very
	important I want to talk a little bit about what happened with What has happened with this back and forth about the field goal kicker for the Kansas City Chiefs And, of course, there's been a lot of anger about that.
	100,000 people have signed a petition.
	They want the Kansas City Chiefs to fire him.
	Now, he just, in the Super Bowl that they won, he kicked four field goals for 12 points, and I think they won by, you know, a two-point margin or something like that.
	But we need to get rid of this guy, who does his job well.
	Why? Well, they don't like what he had to say.
	Because he said things like he suggested to women...
	Graduating with degrees at this very conservative Catholic school, he suggested to them that they had been told diabolical lies about vocational opportunities that were afforded to them.
	And, you know, it's kind of interesting.
	This article talking about the petition was from a Christian news site.
	And they called his commencement speech controversial.
	Controversial? Is it controversial to talk about motherhood and family?
	Is that now controversial with Christians?
	I know it is with these people who are signing this petition.
	They think that is very controversial.
	But, you know, when we look at, there it is right there, look at that.
	100,000 people, and following his controversial commencement speech.
	Well, again, let me play for you real quickly what he had to say.
	Because I think it was interesting that Bill Maher looked at this and said, what's the big deal about this?
	He's not demanding that this happen.
	You know, the Muslims are demanding that you live your life this way.
	He's saying, hey, you know, here's one lifestyle that I like that's really worked out for my wife and I. And saying, but he's not forcing that on anybody.
	What's the big deal with all this stuff?
	And here's what he actually had to say.
	Now this week there's a guy in the news named Harrison Butker.
	He's the kicker on the Kansas City Chiefs, also known as the Taylor Swift Chiefs.
	He got invited to do the commencement address at a conservative Catholic college.
	But look, I can't express how much this guy is not like me.
	He's religious.
	He loves marriage.
	He loves kids. I couldn't be more not like this guy.
	He's in big trouble because he said at this event, and this is a Catholic college, conservative Catholics, and he's now history's greatest monster.
	He's controversial. But I don't get the thing.
	He said, some of you, talking to the women here, some of you may go on to lead successful careers in the world.
	Okay, that seems fairly like modern.
	But I would venture to guess that the majority of you are most excited about your marriage and the children you will bring into this world.
	I don't see what the big crime is.
	I really don't.
	And I think this is part of the problem people have with the left, is that lots of people in this country are like this.
	Like he's saying, some of you may go on to lead successful careers, but a lot of you are excited about this other way that everybody used to be, and now can't that just be a choice too?
	And I feel like they feel very put upon, like there's only one way to be a good person.
	And that's to get an advanced degree from one of those factories like Harvard.
	I find it very ironic that he's saying, you know what, in my world, you know, we like the women to stay at home and just have babies.
	people find this absolutely abhorrent. But 100,000. But we're voting for Hamas. Right. To make that a law. It's not just an opinion in Hamas that you stay home and have the babies.
	We will enforce you for doing that. Okay, I just wanted to make that point.
	Nelly is queers for Palestine, right? Yes. Yeah, anyway, you get the hypocrisy there, right?
	They're campaigning for radical Islamists who will force you to do that.
	And yet they have a problem with this guy.
	They went and fired 100,000 of them.
	Here's what he actually had to say.
	The ladies present today, congratulations on an amazing accomplishment.
	You should be proud of all that you have achieved to this point in your young lives.
	I want to speak directly to you briefly because I think it is you, the women, who have had the most diabolical lies told to you.
	How many of you are sitting here now about to cross this stage and are thinking about all the promotions and titles you are going to get in your career?
	Some of you may go on to lead successful careers in the world, but I would venture to guess that the majority of you are most excited about your marriage and the children you will bring into this world.
	I can tell you that my beautiful wife, Isabel, would be the first to say that her life truly started when she began living her vocation as a wife and as a mother.
	I'm on this stage today and able to be the man I am because I have a wife who leans into her vocation.
	I'm beyond blessed with the many talents God has given me, but it cannot be overstated that all of my success is made possible because a girl I met in band class back in middle school would convert to the faith Become my wife and embrace one of the most important titles of all, Hallmaker. Oh, they applauded.
	How about that? She's a primary educator to our children.
	She is the one who ensures I never let football or my business become a distraction from that of a husband and father.
	She is the person that knows me best at my core, and it is through our marriage that, Lord willing, we will both attain salvation.
	I say all of this to you because I have seen it firsthand how much happier someone can be when they disregard the outside noise and move closer and closer to God's will in their life.
	Isabel's dream of having a career might not have come true.
	But if you asked her today if she has any regrets on her decision, she would laugh out loud, without hesitation, and say, heck, no.
	Yeah. You know, it's interesting, as this Christian article talks about it, he said, they've been told diabolical lies about the vocational opportunities afforded to them.
	And I thought, yeah, it's interesting when they said vocational.
	Where does that word come from? You know, vocation.
	That's like a calling. That's where that came from.
	Just like when he talks about his talents, where did that come from?
	That's a Christian concept.
	The talents in the parable that Jesus told.
	You know, talent was a weight of silver.
	So it was an amount of money that was given to people, right?
	And what do you do with that?
	That was the point of Jesus' parable there, the talent.
	Well, what do you do with your calling?
	What are you called to do?
	And as he pointed out, she even helped him to focus on what his real calling was.
	His real calling was not his job.
	You know, he's making a lot of money.
	He's got a lot of fame as an NFL player and all this stuff.
	But he doesn't see that as his vocation either.
	That's not what he is really about either.
	He's got a vocation as a husband, as a father.
	And those are the things that are his calling.
	Now, I just got to say, I heard an audio book probably about 30 years ago.
	It had a big impact on me.
	It was by Os Guinness, and he's descended from the people who did Guinness beer.
	He's a Christian commentator.
	He kind of leans to the left a bit, but he did an audio book that I listened to called The Call.
	And he talked about how when we look at our job, we look at what we do in the world, regardless of what it is, we do it to the glory of God.
	We do it as if we are working to God.
	And I thought that was, you know, that's, I know that sounds trite to a lot of Christians because you've heard that so many times, but he unpacked that into a lot of different ways.
	I mean, there was a lot more to it.
	That's the fundamental principle there.
	But he unpacked that in a lot of different ways.
	And it came at a time where I was really thinking about there were radical changes going on and how we earned our money and things like that.
	And so it really was an important thing to think about what you do and understand that your identity is not what you do for a living.
	It's just one part of that identity.
	And that what we do for a living and the things that we do in life as Christians are really focused more on our relationship to God.
	And we do it, everything that we do, we do with God in mind.
	So, again, these signers arguing that his comments were sexist, homophobic, anti-trans, anti-abortion, and racist.
	And you know what? I could care less about any of those weaponized terms, and you shouldn't care about any of that stuff either.
	These people are a broken record.
	They can't think.
	They won't debate.
	All they do is hurl epithets at people and labels.
	They label everybody.
	They put everybody into a box you shouldn't care at all about what they say.
	Again, the part of the petition said, these dehumanizing remarks against LGBTQ plus individuals, attacks on abortion rights and racial discrimination, perpetuate division and undermine human rights.
	Well, I think abortion. Undermines human rights.
	Kind of rips it apart.
	So again, Bill Maher said, what's the big crime?
	Isn't it interesting? You know, a Christian site would say, these remarks are controversial.
	When he's talking about motherhood as a high calling.
	And yet, Bill Maher would say, what's the big crime?
	Isn't it a bigger crime to destroy parental rights?
	And of course, as I pointed out yesterday, the Supreme Court, there was a reversal of some of the stuff that was being done by Maryland schools, but the U.S. Supreme Court has now declined to hear a complaint filed on behalf of parents who oppose a policy at Maryland's largest school district,
	allowing staff to hide If their children are being groomed successfully, hide it from the parents.
	That's what it's really about.
	And this is another example, folks, of why the solutions to our problems are local.
	You see, these parents, it's good to fight them in every way possible.
	I'm not complaining about the fact they filed a lawsuit.
	That can work.
	But the reality is that you've got to change the school board.
	You've got to change the schools.
	You've got to get your kids to a different school if they're doing something like this.
	Educate them in a different way.
	If you can't homeschool them, get them to a different school if this is happening.
	And it can be happening even in a Catholic school or a Christian school.
	It could be a Protestant school.
	I've seen this in, you know, whether you're talking about charter schools, Catholic, Protestant, any of this.
	But you can also find some good ones.
	And so you have to look if you can't homeschool.
	But I just want to underscore that the problems are coming from the top down.
	And we're going to have to fight these things locally.
	We're going to have to fight this local school board.
	You're going to have to, you can't depend on the legal system to solve these things for you.
	You're not going to get any help from Washington.
	The Supreme Court doesn't care about parental rights.
	The Supreme Court will allow government schools, that's why the federal government is funding these things, right?
	Why they're giving them money and telling them, you put the boys and the girls' bathrooms and showers, or we're not going to give you the money.
	The federal government is financing this, bribing people to do this.
	The Supreme Court is not going to shut it down.
	And so, you know, you might get lucky every once in a while, but you can fight it at the local level.
	And that's really where you should spend your effort and your time.
	You know, going back a year ago, this was a decision...
	That was the decision that the Supreme Court refused to hear.
	Went back to last August, August of 2023.
	The Fourth Circuit Court said parents cannot sue school district for hiding the student's gender transitions.
	And it was a three-judge panel.
	They appealed that to the Supreme Court.
	The Supreme Court said, we don't care.
	We're not even going to hear the case.
	Not going to hear it. And so, also last year, 2023, you had the judge rejecting religious parents' request to restore an opt-out option for the LGBT book curriculum.
	And again, as I talked about yesterday, mandated grooming, starting in kindergarten.
	You must send your child to it.
	And these are parents from Muslim, Christian, and Jewish backgrounds all coming together saying, well, we have a right to determine this is not age appropriate, what you're giving our kids in kindergarten up to fifth grade, and we don't want them taught this stuff to begin with.
	As I point out, it was 15 years ago that I started doing the stuff about parental rights.
	And at the time, and it wasn't a new thing, other people had been in that fight before.
	That's when I got involved in it, was 15 years ago.
	Other people had been fighting it long before that.
	Michael Ferris, who's with the Homeschool Legal Defense Association, was the one who was setting up the effort to try to get a constitutional amendment to recognize parental rights.
	That would be something that would be helpful.
	But it's still, you know, there is no solution that is 100% certain.
	It's still going to require you to be active at the local level.
	All politics is local.
	And just because you've got a constitutional amendment doesn't mean they're going to respect your free speech, as we've talked about.
	Or your right to own a gun.
	You're still going to have to fight that at the local level.
	But it would have helped. And as we were doing it at the time, what was clearly happening, this is a UN movement.
	Another one of these things that came from the UN. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
	And the only reason they would talk about the rights of the child is to destroy parental rights.
	If the children have rights, the parents have no rights.
	And that's why they were promoting this concept of children's rights.
	Which is now undergirding the fact that children can be groomed by the school, they can make up their mind to mutilate themselves, and there's nothing that the parents should be able to do about it.
	And that's now been endorsed by the courts. And we said that at the time.
	We said, look, even though the United States is the only country that did not sign on to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, the reality is that the courts are making that the de facto agenda.
	All the way up to the Supreme Court, they're supporting that.
	The fight is local.
	The fight is for your family, for your relationship with God, and politics and the political fights are first and foremost at the local level.
	Not the only place we should fight them, but the principal place that we must fight them.
	Thank you for listening. The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲