Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 20, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:29

The David Knight Show - 05/20/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 20th of May, Year of Our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to look at the birds and the bees.
	Yes, I know, there's a lot of people who haven't figured that out yet, or they pretend that they don't know.
	But it's not actually going to be about that.
	We will cover some of that, actually.
	The New York Times has an interesting point.
	They try to argue...
	Multiple genders into the Bible.
	The New York Times. Completely out of their depth.
	But anyway, we'll talk about the birds and the bees because this is about an attack on our food supply.
	And we can see it with the bird flu.
	We can see it with the destruction of a massive amount of farm equipment associated with bees that came after a beehive making Manuka honey in New Zealand.
	Destroyed over two million dollars worth of stuff and no bees were sick.
	This is the game they're playing with the PCR stuff.
	We're also going to talk about artificial intelligence.
	How can it be hallucinating and yet useful at the same time and to whom is it useful?
	We'll talk about that. I think one of the best explanations I've seen about that contradiction.
	We'll be right back.
	I want to begin quickly with the news, however.
	There was an interesting article by Jeffrey Tucker, The Trouble with World Government.
	And he began by saying, and it's kind of an interesting back and forth, that we really have a win.
	You know, we've had a couple of situations where Elon Musk has challenged courts in different countries.
	One in Brazil, another in Australia.
	In each of these cases, he's won.
	And so, Jeffrey Tucker says, well, at least that's one setback for world government.
	Perhaps it is. But he goes on to talk about how world government, at its core...
	It's really a technocracy.
	He even talks about HG Wells and other issues like that, and he's absolutely right about it.
	And he understands that world government has already commenced.
	We already have world governance.
	Folks, look, if you look at what's happened in the federal government, the evolution of the tyranny, From the time that the founders created it, it was immediately, you know, they ignored some things that they themselves had just put in the Constitution, like how the Electoral College would operate and the number of representatives that they would have and things like that.
	So they immediately began ignoring certain aspects of the Constitution that they themselves had put in.
	And then over periods of time, it's gradually dissolved to where it is there as an outline of It's there as an aspiration, and we should keep it as an aspiration.
	And we should keep it for people to understand those who swear to it as a condition of their authority, and then they don't follow it, then they have no authority.
	That's a useful thing for us.
	It's a useful thing for us for the doctrine of the lesser magistrate.
	If we can find somebody at the local level and stand with them, they can't stand alone, somebody at the local level that will stand against this tyranny, the law is on their side.
	Right is on their side.
	And as I said, talking about war, it's so important to have a moral foundation, to understand that you're in this war because you were attacked, for instance.
	And what the motivations are.
	Not that it is something that they want to run because they want to make a lot of money, because they want to test equipment, because they want to train people, whatever their Machiavellian justification for war might be, but the fact that this is a righteous cause.
	And it's very important to us to be standing for the right.
	And we'll talk about that when we get into artificial intelligence.
	The importance of truth.
	The importance of truth.
	It is more important than just winning a debate or being factually right.
	It's what gives us the ability to stand.
	We talk about not having a backbone, having no character, having no principles, and that type of thing.
	We don't want to be a jellyfish.
	And if you have no principles, you have no basis of being able to stand.
	So it is paramount to have those principles, and we'll get to that.
	But as Jeffrey Tucker says, well...
	If you talk about world government, it's not a conspiracy theory.
	It's what they've said that they wanted.
	They've put the plans out there.
	It's amazing to me that they continue to use that term conspiracy theory when it is clearly a conspiracy, a conspiracy with a global elite, a very well-honed conspiracy that's been practiced and repeated and applied in many different ways.
	He says in 1919, H.G. Wells, inspired by the League of Nations by Woodrow Wilson, one of our betraying presidents, became so excited about the idea that he wrote a sweeping reinterpretation of world history that extended from the 9th century B.C. until the present moment.
	It was called The Outline of History.
	The goal of the book was to turn on its head the popular Whig theory from the previous century, which saw history as a story of ever more freedom for individuals and away from powerful states.
	Wells told a story of tribes turning to nations and to regions with ever less power to the people and ever more power to the dictators and to the planners.
	That's what he wanted. His real purpose was to chronicle and defend exactly this.
	So he wrote his outline of history to essentially say, we want a dictatorship.
	We want a dictatorship that's going to be run by the technocracy.
	And of course, later on, he did The Shape of Things to Come.
	Then it was made into a movie, Things to Come.
	So this was initially in 1919.
	Within about another dozen years or so, he had done the book and the movie had come out in the early 30s.
	And Elon Musk's grandfather had set up the technocracy in Canada and tried to overthrow the established government there and install a technocracy.
	They tried him for treason.
	He beat the rap and he beat it out of Canada.
	He went to South Africa.
	That's why Elon Musk came back from South Africa.
	And yet those technocratic ideals are there.
	And so when we look at that versus these wins in Australia and Brazil, and in both cases you had courts that said, well, you may not like it, but you can't censor this worldwide, which is what they were trying to do.
	Australia and Brazil were saying, you've got to censor this content worldwide.
	Worldwide. And the judge said, well, you don't have jurisdiction to do that.
	I don't know how long that will last.
	Judges are political appointees.
	And this is being politically pushed on us from the top down everywhere.
	And so the question is, since Musk is a technocrat, since Musk's family is involved in that, I really don't see him as a freedom fighter.
	There may be some intermediate battles on which he is on our side, but ultimately he is our foe.
	And he is also our foe because the progress shape of history It's not fundamentally about freedom.
	For politics, yes.
	And by the way, there's an excellent book, a very quick read, The Discovery of Freedom by Rose Wilder Lane.
	I really like that. We use that with our kids as well.
	It's so well written, so directly written.
	Rose Wilder Lane is the one who wrote the Little House on the Prairie series about her mother and But she was one who was an excellent writer.
	As I said, very quick read, very direct, very understandable.
	You can read The Little House on the Prairie books to kids.
	They understand it. They understand the discovery of freedom as well.
	And so it's important for us to understand the mechanisms that will make us free in the political world and to see how those were developed in history because we're losing them.
	Folks, the sweep of history is ultimately about God working in this world through Christ.
	So we don't make an idol out of the government, but we do need to understand how the levers are applied.
	And we need to understand that what you're seeing happening here, the technocrats, just like the Uniparty in Washington, is not monolithic.
	You have different factions, and they're really coming after each other because it's a game of thrones.
	And so, that's the way you should understand this.
	It isn't like Elon Musk is this benevolent billionaire who's going to put his fortune on the line to save free speech for all of us.
	That is unbelievably naive.
	But that is the view that has been put out there by Alex Jones and a lot of people who have worshipped at his feet, hoping that he'll give them something.
	And he has. He has.
	The thesis of H.G. Wells' book, It was valuable, however, in some historical respects, writes Jeffrey Tucker, even though it was genuinely bizarre.
	He imagined a future world ruled by a tiny elite of the smartest people who would plan all economies, all information flow, all migration patterns, all governance systems, while crushing national ambitions, free enterprise, traditions, and constitutions.
	Folks, that's the technocracy.
	That's the global government in a nutshell.
	Everything they want to do.
	He said it was crazy stuff and it didn't happen, even though he doesn't mention Joshua Haldane, who tried to do it, actually, in Canada.
	But the efforts never stopped with a certain class of intellectuals.
	Following World War II, you had similar efforts.
	The UN, he said.
	We had the World Bank, the IMF. He says, none of these worked out either.
	Well, I wouldn't be so sure, quite frankly.
	When you look at their agenda, and if you understand what the purpose of these various organizations, these global organizations are, they have their meetings where they get together face-to-face.
	Yeah, not over Zoom so that people can watch what they're doing.
	They get together face-to-face.
	As I point out many times, Ed Ball, who was the UK official, eye up.
	And he goes to the side of the Bilderberg meeting.
	Karen got the video of him.
	He didn't have his badge.
	Couldn't find his badge. He opens up his suitcase to see if he can find it.
	And there he's got a little roll-on suitcase.
	And the contents of the suitcase dropped out.
	And it was all paperwork.
	All paperwork. I don't know where the rest of his luggage was, if it was on the way or whatever.
	I mean, they didn't even see a toothbrush.
	It's all paperwork. And so they have their meetings where they make their plans in private and secret.
	They put these things out there.
	They're meeting with the media. They're meeting with the leaders of these multinational corporations, people like Alex Karp I was talking about last week with Palantir.
	They have a lot of money.
	They have the ability to make this stuff happen.
	This is a fascist system, a merger of states and corporations, and of course the corporations that are the news media, the head of the biggest newspapers and organizations are there.
	They do it secretly at Bilderberg and some other places.
	They do it very publicly at Davos and World Economic Forum.
	So there's no question about what they want to do.
	But, you know, it is a detailed plan, and the important part about it for the UN, for IMF and other things, they do have mechanisms to push this along.
	And the UN, more than anything else, is there to create the plans, and the World Economic Forum is there to bring in the businesses so they can fund this stuff.
	It's very much like politics.
	You know, as you had H.L. Mencken say, an election is an advanced auction of stolen goods.
	Well, that's what's going on at Bilderberg.
	It's an advanced auction of stolen goods.
	We're going to do this and this, and then that means that you're going to have monopoly over the food supply and distribution.
	What are you willing to put in to get that?
	It's just that simple. They are reorganizing and changing everything for world governance, and it is a quid pro quo thing.
	An advanced auction of stolen goods, and they're going to steal everything from us if we don't stop them.
	And so the purpose of these groups, he says, well, the UN turned out to be a disappointment for many.
	I'm afraid I disagree with that.
	I think they're getting their way.
	The purpose of the UN is to create this outline and to push it out to everybody, just like the purpose of the World Economic Forum is to get the actual moving parts together and get the funding together and that type of thing.
	They work in a distributed way.
	And we need to understand that, or we won't, if we think that there's these individual groups, and there's, which one of them is going to be the world, well, they're working as a network.
	It's a distributed network of government.
	It's secretive.
	It's a cartel. He says, the drive to Unite Europe was advertised as a liberal move to inspire cooperation on trade and travel, to make economic cooperation possible, but that was just a pitch.
	The reality of the EU was creation of a bureaucracy in Brussels that would override the sovereignty of nations and force deference to a new central state in Europe that actually had no historical precedent.
	It was an experiment in region-wide government planning.
	And actually, we need to take a step back from that as well, because it was what was proposed by Zbigniew Brzezinski, Mika Brzezinski's father, And he said, well, we will consolidate things economically.
	This is what is different about this world war that has been going on since the Second War.
	It's a world war, a very long-range plan by the global elite to control us through economics.
	Rather than having a war to get what they want, they will use war to cull the population.
	But rather than the old-style thing, well, you know, we would like to have this area on the map, so we're going to invade it, that type of thing, like you saw with World War II and earlier.
	Instead of that, their conquest is through subversion.
	It's a banker world government.
	That's why when he talks about the IMF and the World Bank and, well, they didn't go where they want.
	No, actually, it's running through the financial stuff.
	That's why the CBDC is the final linchpin in all of this.
	It's all about the money.
	And what they were talking about, Zbigniew Brzezinski in the 70s, but, of course, they'd been working toward it, was to have a...
	Have a consolidation economically.
	So what we would do is we would create a trade zone.
	Well, yeah, great. Everybody's in favor of that, right?
	Have a free trade zone in Europe.
	People can trade within it.
	You know, that's what made America prosperous.
	It was a free trade zone within because of the Commerce Clause.
	That was the purpose of it. Say that you're not going to tax goods coming from Tennessee to North Carolina or vice versa, that type of thing.
	And so they created a free trade zone.
	But the goal from the very beginning, from the second Bilderberg group, was to have a common currency.
	That then gave them economic planning capabilities.
	If you've got a common currency, you've got a common European Central Bank, these other things, now they've got economic planning.
	And so they began with the free trade, absence of the taxes and stuff that nobody wants.
	And then what they do is, through that freedom, through that free trade, they gradually enact a system of regulations and controls and economic union.
	And they would do that in three different areas, right?
	Europe, North America, and Asia.
	And that's what these treaties were about.
	Trans-Pacific, Transatlantic Partnership.
	That they put together to create these free trade zones and then to start to link them together, these three zones.
	That's one of the reasons why he called it the Trilateral Commission.
	And, of course, they really liked what he was coming up with.
	He also talked about between two ages.
	In that book, he talked about the coming technocratic ages, what Zabigniew Brzezinski called it.
	But they said, we'll know everything that you're going to do before you do it.
	That's being brought in with artificial intelligence now.
	Quite frankly, you know, when we look at AI, and I'm going to get to that in a moment, but when we look at AI, it has a lot of hallucination.
	How does it put this stuff together?
	Is it really thinking? Is it conscious?
	No, it's not. And why does it come up with hallucinations and things like that?
	Well, it's inherent in its design.
	But it can be very useful for some things.
	It can be very useful for surveillance.
	Because that's the thing that it is the best at, and that is identifying patterns and similarities and bringing them together.
	It's precisely what the surveillance state wants.
	That's why the surveillance state created it.
	And we have to understand that, you know, when we look at artificial intelligence, it is the enabling technology of the big brother surveillance state.
	Omniscient, omnipresent, and in order to give that information to the government to make it omnipotent, to make it godlike.
	He says, one way to understand the pandemic response, COVID, is as a further experiment in world government, a way for the elites to broadcast to the entire planet, that they can achieve global cooperation when they want to.
	In most every nation, Jeffrey Tucker, the response was the same in terms of timing and protocol.
	How many times have I said this?
	Do you realize that we have global governance?
	Just take a look at the pandemic.
	Do you think that it makes a difference to have Donald Duck or Goofy in as president?
	Look at what Trump did.
	He did exactly the same thing that Trudeau did.
	At exactly the same time.
	And none of it made any sense, but it was all part of the global plan.
	And it doesn't matter What your personal preference is in terms of these personalities or your philosophical, supposedly the philosophical basis of the political party that you support, that's just there to deceive you.
	It's just there to gain your trust.
	So pick your pick, Trump or Trudeau.
	They're going to do the same thing as far as these global pandemics and the existential challenges to us.
	Yes, there will be other real differences out there.
	But when you look at their relentless march to world government and to a surveillance state, and just maybe we should just have a new acronym for that.
	Instead of saying surveillance state, just call it the serve state.
	Because you will be serving the state.
	You'll be a slave to the state.
	You just spell it S-U-R-V. Serve state.
	What they did not tell anyone is that none of this constituted common public health sense measures, but rather amounted to an experiment without any precedent in the history of humanity.
	Nowhere had all this cockamamie stuff ever been implemented.
	Only crazy people had recommended it in the past.
	Well, yeah, the CIA. They had recommended and practiced these exact measures since two months before 9-11.
	You know, we need to understand what the history is here, fully.
	Yeah, people are starting to put this thing together, but we still are missing some parts of this.
	And that's why I mention this.
	Jeffrey Tucker's got a lot of this stuff right.
	He says, but he's missing some of the context here.
	The bigger context.
	The context of the CIA germ games, for example.
	No question that a nascent world government is in operation today, he says.
	Well, I'm good. I'm glad that he saw that.
	That's good that he sees that, because that is really what we have.
	Now, we have, actually on Friday, this featured mainstream media, billionaire investor Ray Dalio warns that the USA is on the brink, and he estimates there's more than one in three chance of civil war.
	He thinks there's about a 40% chance of civil war.
	Is he right? You know, the First American Civil War, as I've said many times, is not about slavery, but this one will be about slavery.
	It'll be about your slavery. And I say the First American Civil War was not about slavery.
	Because we had exactly the same thing happening at exactly the same time, 1861 to 1865 in Italy, as I've talked about this many times.
	It was part of the Industrial Revolution.
	It was part of the consolidation of the nation-state.
	And that was happening not just in America, but it was happening throughout Europe, even happened in South America.
	We had wars that consolidated, got a change from the agrarian society to the industrialized society and created the consolidated nation-state.
	That was happening everywhere. That was what the American Civil War was about.
	Slavery was unique in the sense that it was involved in America, but these other agrarian societies, these other societies were organized along agrarian and decentralized lines, and they had a civil war at the same time as well.
	And we nearly had a civil war in the 1830s, I point out many times, a nullification crisis.
	And yet, they backed off at that time because the timing was not right.
	The timing is right now.
	And nowhere in here does Ray Dalio say anything about the fourth turning or these seasonal cycles of history.
	And I've said for the longest time, you know, we go back and look at the previous fourth turnings.
	The previous one was World War II and the Great Depression.
	Prior to that, the American Civil War.
	Prior to that, the American Revolutionary War.
	Strauss and Howell went back 500 years looking at that history.
	I've said for the longest time, this one is going to be really, really big.
	Really, really big. Because this is global in a way that even World War II and the Great Depression were not global.
	And it is changing fundamentally.
	You know, even though World War II and the Great Depression were global, this is going to be a far more fundamental change because of the technocrats and because of the technocracy.
	And so as we go into this fourth turning where they try to establish the technocracy, I've said many times, we may wind up with all three that we've had in America, all three fourths turnings.
	We may wind up with a Revolutionary War, Civil War, and a World War, all at the same time.
	So it's not surprising to see him say this.
	I don't think he's got any particular insights.
	It's Forbes magazine, which is, I'm sorry, Fortune...
	Fortune Magazine, which is looking at him.
	Of course, they're very impressed by the fact that he is a billionaire investor.
	Very successful. It reminds me of a fiddle on the roof if I were a rich man, right?
	So the most important men would come to me.
	They would fawn to me.
	They would ask me to advise them.
	And it wouldn't matter if I was right or wrong, because if you're rich, they think you really know.
	Well, of course. You know, we should bow and scrape to these billionaires.
	Whether it's Ray Dalio or Trump or Elon Musk, because they really know, don't they?
	Well, actually, no, not necessarily.
	They don't really know.
	They have a lot of money.
	Just one person said, the rich are really different from us.
	They have a lot of money.
	But they suffer from the same blind spots.
	The same struggles that everybody in humanity has.
	So, as we look at this, what are they pushing us towards?
	And I think it's kind of interesting to see Biden speaking this weekend.
	Especially because there is a story that really hasn't been covered by the mainstream media at all.
	A New American had the story.
	A would-be mass shooter.
	And they stopped this guy.
	He was bragging about it on social media, what he was going to do.
	And it was all about a race war.
	Except it was a race war against whites.
	So they're not interested in that because they want to push that.
	Quite frankly, they want to push a race war.
	And I've said this for the longest time.
	You go back and you look at the Marxists who were marching through the institutions, but especially Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn and the Weather Underground, they really focused on a race war because they understood that the class warfare, as the Marxists had used in Europe, really wasn't working. So they needed a race war.
	And we still have these Marxists that are running our government are still pushing that.
	They're pushing it through the universities just as Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn pushed it through education.
	That's what they're doing. His name is Joshua Cobb.
	He was planning a major mass shooting with 10-plus body count, even though he seethed with hatred.
	Oh, wait a minute.
	Hatred itself is supposed to be a crime now, right?
	He posted on social media about how he intended to target a specific racial group, but he's black and his targets were white, and so it's not going to be reported by the mainstream media.
	The Marine Corps Times reported the story, and I got it from the New American.
	He was saying, I want some of the things that he posted.
	I want to cause mayhem on the white community.
	The reason I specifically want to target white people is because as a black male, they will never understand my struggles.
	Never is all uppercase.
	Now, that's precisely the hatred, the bigotry, the lies being pushed by Joe Biden at a commencement address this weekend.
	And as you listen to him say that, I want you to remember that Biden, more than any other individual out there, certainly more than any other individual in the government now, was responsible for the war on drugs, for the mandatory minimums that locked up so many black people.
	He was responsible for civil asset forfeiture.
	Biden has been opposed, antithetically, totally opposed to the idea of natural rights.
	Opposed to the Bill of Rights.
	And everything that he has done has been in opposition to that.
	And yet, he is out there now cynically talking about he's going to legalize marijuana, perhaps at the federal level, for votes.
	The guy who did more to lock up people on the basis of marijuana, mandatory minimums, is now going to pretend to be something he's never been.
	And isn't now. And so he was pushing this race war at a commencement address.
	Listen to the hate, the bigotry, the lies.
	Today, you missed your high school graduation.
	You started college just as George Floyd was murdered.
	And there was a reckoning on race.
	It's natural to wonder if democracy you hear about actually works for you.
	What is democracy?
	If black men are being killed in the street, what is democracy?
	The trail of broken promises will leave black communities behind.
	What is democracy?
	You have to be ten times better than anyone else to get a fair shot.
	And most of all, what does it mean, as we've heard before, to be a black man who loves his country, even if it doesn't love him back in equal measure?
	Hardly anybody clapped.
	Hardly anybody clapped.
	Isn't that interesting? Not even at that black college.
	Yeah, democracy, in other words, democracy is futile.
	Burn the place down.
	Burn the place down. You've got to be ten times better than anybody.
	Has he ever noticed the DEI stuff?
	I thought merit didn't even matter anymore.
	We're just allocating spots based on their categories that they create.
	Skin color, sexual orientation, whatever else they may come up with.
	So, yeah, this guy, I currently, he said, lack the means necessary to kill as many as I intend to, but one day I will have the available resources.
	Yeah, you know, ammunition is very expensive.
	Difficult to even practice here.
	These included... The targets included a Jersey Strong gym, that's a brand name, Jersey Strong, and Aldi grocery store in Mercer County.
	He said he picked those places because he thought it would be white people who were unarmed there.
	My rampage will soon happen.
	He said, I plan to continue accumulating the necessary equipment needed to execute once all equipment is in.
	Time will then tell you will all die.
	He's obviously deranged, but anybody who would do something like this is also obviously deranged.
	So that doesn't mean, well, yeah, he's just talking crazy.
	Yeah, well, people who are crazy talk crazy.
	They do crazy things as well.
	It took him a while to do anything about it, actually, as well.
	He was writing that stuff in May of 2023, a year ago.
	So again, you know, this is the FBI, but I think it's interesting that it was not publicized by the mainstream media, even if it was.
	There's no indication that he was pushed into it, as they're known to do so many times.
	No indication yet, at least.
	So Cobb expressed a genocidal desire to exterminate an entire race.
	To the mainstream media, however, this is a page 38 story.
	And to Congress, there will be no monitoring of this kind of hate.
	Because if they were to do that, they would see that it is coming from the very universities that they want to monitor for anti-Semitism, but not for this kind of race war hatred, because they want that kind of race war.
	This is why I say, what should your reaction be?
	Well, I'm going to get them before they get me, right?
	No. This is why I say all along, you know, that, yes, we want to have freedom, and we can study the discovery of freedom and things that have changed it along the way.
	But the founders of this country understood that liberty is a blessing from God.
	And the key thrust is that we understand that if we follow God, which means that we follow the way that he tells us to act, that means that we move to take down these barriers and That we treat everybody as brother and sister in Christ and that type of thing.
	We understand that we are all created by God.
	We understand that we all have our faults.
	If we bring these things together, I don't see anything uniting us.
	Except for Christ.
	Frankly, you look at these politicians and they are dividing people left and right.
	And even when we report about these various things, it can be, you know, and we need to understand that there is a strong division between light and darkness.
	We don't want to run away from that and just say, oh, nothing matters, kumbaya.
	No, we need to understand what the truth is.
	We need to understand what is right.
	We also need to understand that it can be uniting.
	And that is the only way they're going to get over this Hatfield and McCoys, this genocidal desire for people to be purged here.
	Which is what they're selling in the Marxist universities.
	That's why it bothers me so much to see them so narrowly focus on this one thing.
	They're missing the whole picture here.
	It's just special privileges for a group that's going to give them money.
	They don't care about the bigger problem.
	So he says in this article, there's a lot to unpack here.
	First, as black Reverend Jesse Lee Peterson's often said, the anti-white hatred that Cobb reflects has been ginned up by demagogues, by media propagandists, and it's totally unjustifiable.
	And, of course, it's been ginned up by the universities especially.
	Second, he aimed to target places where people be unarmed.
	That supports the gun-free zone argument.
	As a matter of fact, they point out in this article, remember 2013, we talked about this, you had some journalists go around to the homes of some, had some activists go to the homes of some pro-gun gun control journalists.
	People want to take the guns from other people.
	So we got a sign. I noticed that you're really with us on gun control.
	Would you put this sign up?
	This home is proudly gun-free.
	Well, they'd write about that all the time.
	They didn't want to put that sign on their home.
	One of them even said, that'd be an open invitation, don't you think, for somebody to come here and rob us?
	See, the mere presence of firearms restrains evil, as George Washington said.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to give you an update as to what happened with Julian Assange.
	the court met this morning to consider the extradition appeal and there has been a decision and we'll tell you what that is when we return so let's go.
	so
	.
	Making sense.
	It's common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	They were trying to extradite him for a charge that ultimately they dropped in Sweden.
	Said it was a setup.
	uh... then he said has spent five years in belmarsh a very harsh prison and there had been uh... at court order to have an extradited to united states and he appealed and as part of that appeal uh... they had uh... the high court in london met today to see whether or not they would allow this extradition to occur they said they had to be satisfied with u s assurances that a sign would not
	face the death penalty that he could rely on the first amendment right to free speech if he faced a u s trial for spying The British court did not believe that the U.S. would guarantee that stuff.
	And we all know they wouldn't.
	The U.S. government doesn't support free speech in any way, shape, or form anymore.
	It doesn't support a fair trial.
	It tries to kill its enemies.
	They've got their communication management units really harsh.
	Look at what they're doing to the January 6th people.
	Look at what they're doing to the people who are being imprisoned for violating the Faith Act.
	76-year-old woman just given several years in prison.
	What did she do? She peacefully stood there and tried to persuade people not to kill their child.
	Can't have that. Not in America.
	So, yeah, our justice system is a dystopian sci-fi novel.
	And they did not accept that.
	And so now this court says he's got a right to appeal the extradition.
	Which is important, but it still doesn't...
	You know, he's still in Belmarsh prison while he's appealing this.
	So what he won... Was the right to appeal extradition.
	If he had lost this case today, they would have shipped him out.
	I'll just remind you that Julian Assange, all of these charges against him, were put in there by Bill Barr.
	Bill Barr, who was George H.W. Bush's Attorney General is a much younger man.
	And he had been George H.W. Bush's right-hand man at the CIA when George H.W. Bush rebuilt it after the church hearings.
	And he was a Bushy.
	He was CIA from the very beginning.
	And you have to ask yourself, why is Trump appointing people like Gina Haspel?
	Why is he appointing people like Bill Barr?
	Is he one of the baddies?
	Well, yes, he is.
	That's why I call him Benedict Donald.
	And it was under the Trump administration, not under the Obama administration, that they created these massive crimes.
	Far over the top.
	And it was done just a very short time after Trump put in Bill Barr.
	After he got rid of Jeff Sessions.
	And Jeff Sessions resigned under pressure.
	And he put in Bill Barr.
	Now, if you think that Trump is loyal to anybody...
	Look at Julian Assange, who helped him to get into office, and even said, you know, look, I'm going to release this information about Hillary Clinton.
	He said, we don't know what Donald Trump is, but we do know that Hillary Clinton is a warmonger, a criminal.
	It remains to be seen what Trump is.
	Well, now we know what Trump is, quite frankly, just because of, you know, if nothing else, look at Julian Assange.
	Trump has absolutely no loyalty to the people who help him.
	Trump has absolutely no loyalty to the principles of the First Amendment or free speech or anything else like that.
	He signed off on all this.
	He refused to pardon Julian Assange.
	I remember Alex Jones saying, I've got inside information.
	He's going to pardon him before he leaves office midnight tonight.
	Yeah. Alex Jones, always right, right?
	No. And then we'll take a look at the January Sixers.
	Jake Lang emerges from 36 days in sensory deprivation chamber.
	Perhaps the treatment of J-6 prisoners had some enlightening effect on the British court system when they see how corrupt, how lawless, how evil, how vindictive,
	how draconian We're good to go.
	And this was on Friday.
	With a hallmark that what doesn't kill us makes us stronger attitude.
	Forty months ago, he said, today on January the 16th, 2021, I was kidnapped from my home in upstate New York by the Gestapo FBI for my role on January the 6th.
	And I have remained incarcerated by the Biden regime as a J6 political prisoner without bond and without trial since.
	Is that okay? Obviously, no, right?
	Constitution, you have a speedy trial, you have prohibition against excessive punishment.
	Not giving somebody a trial, keeping them in solitary confinement for 40 months, that's excessive punishment.
	That's denial of a speedy trial right there.
	End of story.
	He says, today, after nearly 40 days in a sensory deprivation chamber...
	He said it was horrific, solitary confinement.
	He says, I've finally been released back into the general population where I can stretch my legs, can do Bible studies, and not starve every night.
	I beat the fabricated institutional charges against me, he said in all uppercase.
	These last 40 months have been undeniably difficult, but they have been an epic journey of God's potent grace and his ability to give enduring strength to the name of Jesus, overshadowing the most insane third-world treatment of American citizens since Japanese internment camps during World War II.
	The spiritual significance of the number 40 is seen over and over again in God's living word.
	Noah spent 40 days in the ark.
	Moses led the Jewish people for 40 days through the desert until they finally reached the promised land, Eretz Israel.
	Jesus fasted for 40 days as the Spirit descended upon him and appeared to thousands in Israel victorious after resurrection for 40 days.
	Make no mistake, America, your soul-felt prayers are shifting the atmosphere, he says.
	The battle is far from over, but today, after 40 months, we prophesy the victory in Jesus' name.
	Well, we'll see what happens.
	Because, see, the problem is that he writes the Gateway Pundit, We need to vote to Trump to end this madness.
	No, keep your hope in God.
	Keep your hope in Christ.
	Trump is not that.
	He is not your hope.
	He is a misdirection.
	If you put your hope in Trump and not in God and not in what you can do at the local level.
	See, that's the role that Trump serves.
	He is the decoy.
	He is the red herring to keep people from actually doing what they need to do.
	And I understand that we have a uni party in Washington that has pushed all this stuff and is going to continue to do it.
	I know that he's been locked up.
	He hasn't seen the news. He hasn't seen what's happening.
	Perhaps he's new to politics.
	Perhaps that's why he went to January the 6th in the first place.
	He trusted Trump.
	And trusting Trump got him in jail.
	I knew it. I told people.
	Some people listened. Others didn't.
	I've had some people who listened who have told me that.
	But it was very clear what was going to happen, and it's very clear what's going to happen if we trust Trump, not just for January the 6th, but if we trust him for 2024.
	He is going to be the decoy that is going to lead us astray.
	So, very sad to see that happening.
	On Rock Fan, Amos Poole.
	Good to see you there. Thank you very much.
	That's very kind. I appreciate that.
	CityCard didn't allow me to tip you, but I think we're good for a while.
	wanted to ask if the UN and one world government was something the Nazis got behind. There's a lot of indications that you know these were old Nazis that put this stuff together at Bilderberg from the very fact that their first meeting was ten years to the day after the last Nazi victory in World War II at the site of the last Nazi victory.
	That Bilderberg Hotel that they named the group after was right there at that bridge, part of Operation Market Garden.
	And guess what? The two guys who put it together, one German, one British, Peter Carrington, and what's the German guy's name?
	I can't remember. But they were the two that put it together.
	It was Prince Bernhard from the Netherlands.
	He was suspected, both of these guys were suspected, of having an instrumental role in the fact that the Nazis won.
	Being forewarned, many people believed, by Prince Bernhardt and by Carrington, who refused to move up the tanks when it was necessary in the middle of the battle.
	He sat there and did nothing.
	So these two guys were instrumental in the very last victory of the Nazis in World War II. And at the very sight...
	Ten years to the day, they create Bilderberg.
	I believe that you look at Bilderberg, you look at World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, it's got Nazi fingerprints all over it.
	And they want to do it economically, what they fail to do militarily.
	On Rockfin, Michelle Obama.
	Thank you very much for that tip.
	I appreciate that. I just want to remind people, like the stream, please, and help us get that.
	And also... We'll be getting to some financial news, but remember that if you go to davidknight.gold, that'll take you to Tony Ardman.
	When we look at these uncertain times and things that are happening, as I said, you better start focusing on yourself, focusing on your community.
	Focus on yourself, your relationship with God, your relationship with your family, your community.
	Start to build those things.
	We've got to rebuild America from the bottom up.
	Our government is rotting from the top down.
	Stop thinking that you're going to get everything taken care of by putting some billionaire, some narcissistic, greedy billionaire who has succumbed to the lust of the eye, the lust of the flesh, and the pride of life.
	I mean, you know, and I say this, and I do feel sorry for him when you look at him, these clips I played last week.
	People said, well, you ever asked, it was Frank Luntz, and they had a question, you know, same thing was asked a few months later by fake Jake Tapper.
	And, you know, I'm a fan.
	You know, Jake Tapper is CNN. He's, again, it's the Game of Thrones stuff, but Jake Tapper is not on our side, you know, and, of course, neither is Frank Luntz.
	He is a real fan.
	I'm a public opinion manipulator.
	But isn't it interesting that it took a couple of guys like that to ask Trump the penetrating question?
	That he would never be asked in public by any of these pastors that suck up to him.
	It's like, what? You know, you've got Paula White, you've got Robert Jeffries, these people of megachurches and everything.
	And to me... Do they have absolutely, it's just an act of disbelief and an actual total disregard for Trump to use him.
	As Robert Jeffries and Paula White and so many others, they use him to get fame and fortune themselves.
	And they have absolutely no concern for his eternal soul.
	He's going to hell in a handbasket because he doesn't even want to ask for forgiveness.
	Because he thinks that he's, oh yeah, I've done some bad things, you know, but I've done a lot of good things and I just make it right.
	Well, you know, God's not going to be impressed with your payoff of a hooker.
	And I don't know when you've got this, you know, what good things do you do to offset that?
	I don't know. Because there isn't anything, right?
	In God's economy, he said the wages of sin are death.
	And that's why Christ died in our stead.
	That's one of the things that's different about Christianity and other religions, is that God actually came to us.
	We didn't go to him. He actually made this offer to us and did it himself so that he could be both just and merciful at the same time.
	And he doesn't even want to have anything to do with it.
	Doesn't feel like he needs it, which is just one of the saddest things I've seen.
	You know, as much as I dislike Trump, and you know I really dislike him, and how he's harmed people, he is a mass murderer.
	But when you understand what is involved in hell, it makes you sorry even for a mass murderer like Donald Trump.
	It really does. And it would be faithlessness to not feel that way.
	Well, one more article here, a little bit lighter, before we take a break.
	For the longest time, pull this up, Travis, and people need to, I think everybody knows, the kind of these funny wigs that people, the woke scalp article that's there.
	There you go, right there.
	There's a Breitbart's picture of it.
	All of these barristers there with their wigs on.
	And now we have a person who is saying that it is culturally insensitive.
	To people with African hair.
	And it's not just that he's a black man.
	I mean, you know, we've got a lot of black guys who wear their hair short or whatever.
	I would imagine these guys, all these barristers here, they wear their hair pretty short.
	I mean, if they had hair like Fabio or something, they'd look pretty ridiculous in these wigs.
	Of course, you might say they look ridiculous anyway.
	But it is a long tradition.
	And what he has decided is that he wants to have this change for his benefit.
	That it is culturally insensitive.
	Well, no, it's not. It's their culture.
	It's their culture since the 1600s.
	For 400 years, they've been doing this type of thing, at least.
	And he's the one who is culturally insensitive.
	And so, they want to scrap the requirement for barristers to wear traditional wigs and claims that they discriminate against lawyers with Afro-Caribbean hair.
	The guy has got a large Afro.
	That's what it says.
	He has a large Afro hairstyle.
	Well, you know, he chose his hairstyle.
	And if that wig is...
	I'm going to set something on the top.
	I imagine it does look ridiculous.
	So you might want to try to fit in.
	But no, see, that's the attitude of migrants.
	We have to conform to them.
	We have 400 years of tradition, or they do.
	You've got to conform it to me.
	Because I want to wear my hair a particular way.
	So all of you will have to adjust what you wear.
	That's absurd. Culturally insensitive.
	Actually, he's culturally misappropriating something, I think.
	But the wigs should certainly go.
	There isn't any place in a modern society for barristers to be wearing 17th century fashion, he said.
	And there's other archaic dress code items that he wants to have scrapped as well.
	Maybe we could have everybody there at the British court.
	Maybe they could all dress like John Fetterman in his early days there before he recovered from his stroke.
	And they could all just wear sloppy shorts.
	But again, the key is...
	This guy is flipping his wig, wigging out, because he wants everybody to adapt to him.
	400 years of tradition, just gone.
	And it's bigger than just this one guy and this fight.
	This is why there's a massive great replacement.
	It's why you have the leftists doing all this stuff.
	Everything must, all tradition, all statues, all names, you know, names of forts, names of schools, statues, cultural traditions, they all must be erased.
	We're at the point now where they're trying to take everything down.
	And that's why this is important.
	Otherwise, who cares about this?
	I mean, it is kind of, it is a strange tradition, but it is a tradition.
	It is a culture, and this is about just leveling the culture.
	Erasing all cultural distinctions everywhere, so we can have this one monolithic, gray culture everywhere.
	I've always found the English court systems be...
	At the very least, very amusing.
	When Karen and I went and spent a good deal of time in 1980 when we got married and then we went back again in 1984, both times we wanted to go to Old Bailey, which is a central criminal court, to watch a trial because of all this stuff, right?
	Well, it'd be interesting. You know, and so we queued up and we waited to get into Old Bailey and it was a very interesting case.
	And it was an international espionage case and all this other kind of stuff.
	And we got into it like in the middle.
	And I thought, you know, that's an interesting, that'd be an interesting way to begin a movie.
	You know, have a narrative where you kind of jump into it at the trial stage and then kind of backfill the story.
	Because that's what we were trying to do was try to backfill the story.
	And just as we're starting to put some pieces together...
	The guy who was on the witness stand, and they call it a stand because you'd stand, you know.
	Anyway, he said something about CIA and Malta.
	And immediately they jumped up and said, Stop!
	We've got to have this.
	And they go up to the bench and talk up there.
	And the judge says, All right, everybody out.
	And... We're going to have to talk about this, but we can't do it in front of the public.
	And so they emptied the courtroom and had a very small number of people that were there because it was the CIA and they were at Malta.
	I don't know what it was. I don't know if it's a Falcon or what it was in Malta.
	I don't know. Left us scratching our heads.
	And I was like, I want to come back tomorrow and see what's going on and see if we can piece some more of this together because it was really interesting.
	But you line up to go into these different cases and you have absolutely no guarantee that you're going to get back into that same courtroom again.
	They just put people at random in the different courtrooms every day so you could spend a lot of time and queue up there and not get back to that trial.
	You go to something completely different.
	So we dropped it at that point.
	On Rockfan, Andromeda1, thank you very much for the tip.
	And on Rumble, Mulan Labbe, 966, one of the few places we can get the truth.
	Thank you, David. God bless.
	And thank you for the tip. I appreciate that.
	We're going to talk about, we picked up, I'll give you an overview as to where we are financially.
	Thank you for all the tips people are leaving.
	And talk a little bit about some of the things that we picked up in the mailbox.
	And we will be right back in just a little bit.
	Using free speech to free minds.
	I'm sorry.
	It's the David Knight Show!
	The Common Man Bye bye.
	you They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com Well, I want to thank some of the people who have sent us well I wanna thanks and people who have sent us contributions by mail and for me and Jim M thank you very much
	been and Cindy be thank you David and Thank you very much from Canada.
	Thank you.
	That was very generous.
	I appreciate that.
	Incredibly generous.
	Uh, they've been a very long and strong supporters of ours and, um, they doubled down this month, uh, John and Mary Lou B.
	Thank you very much.
	Stephanie K.
	John W.
	David and Ann Marie N.
	Margaret Mary T.
	Tim S.
	Also, thank you.
	That's very generous.
	And he wrote a very nice letter and let me just read a little bit of it here here because he asked. I had a comment and a question.
	And he said, the main reason I listen is your commitment to Christ.
	Well, thank you. He says, but as you get buried in all of this slop of the world, And you look into the abyss.
	What are you doing to feed yourself?
	Please take time to renew yourself in Christ.
	Well, I have to say, I do more with that than I do to physically take care of myself and renew myself physically.
	But thank you for the reminder.
	That is important.
	And that is important for all of us to understand what that is.
	And many times we can get caught up in this and not pay attention to ourselves.
	That's the big trap I see over and over again from a lot of pastors.
	Oh, I'm doing great stuff here and this is really important.
	They neglect their family, they neglect other things like that, and then it comes back to get them.
	So that is key.
	I'm aware of it.
	And I do a better job of that side of it than I do the physical side of it.
	However, I have had, and I'll talk about it tomorrow, I have had some people send me some health things, and they have been beneficial, and I've been able to get better metrics of things that we're measuring and not using the pharmaceutical stuff.
	Stop the pharmaceutical stuff, and things are better.
	So I just want to thank people who have sent that.
	Aaron W., thank you.
	MPS and MJS in Knoxville, close by.
	Stacey P., I also sent a card and said, God bless you with the same peace, hope, and love that you bring to the lives of others.
	This sums it up for me, she said.
	Stacey, thank you very much.
	I appreciate that. And I don't want to, you know, that's the other thing, too.
	When I look at this and I get angry about the things that are done and the injustices and the crimes that are done, I don't want to get so angry and dark that I leave other people that way as well.
	And finally, Ryan F. Thank you, all of you.
	Appreciate that so much.
	Okay, they found Iran's president.
	Dead after a helicopter crash on Sunday.
	Oh, yeah. It was missing for quite some time.
	They said it was foggy weather, but, you know...
	We lie, we cheat, we steal, we assassinate, we do coups.
	We have classes on that, as Pompeo said.
	But it just keeps going, doesn't it?
	You know, we keep escalating things.
	Perhaps it was an accident.
	Yeah, right. But...
	We will talk about that, but I want to talk first about the birds and the bees that I mentioned at the beginning of the program.
	Because both what is happening with the bees at one beekeeper's place in New Zealand, and of course, Manuka honey, if you ever looked at it.
	Manuka honey is highly valued and prized because of...
	You know, they'll have different types of honey based on what the bees are consuming.
	You know, based on you can get local honey that's going to help you to fight your allergies to pollen and things like that.
	And Manuka honey has a lot of medicinal purposes, and it is a real premium honey that is sold globally.
	And this guy in New Zealand, there was not...
	Mainstream media hasn't really talked about this.
	It's really only on social media.
	But he explains what happened as the government came on to his bee farm and just told them they had to burn the bees.
	And there's no compensation for it either.
	We would like people to know there's been messages online that you have to destroy clinical A, B and B heights.
	In my 35 years experience, we have always done this.
	We have always destroyed any high clinical A, B and have done really well.
	We have a great outfit.
	We are an organic beekeepers.
	I have great staff.
	The videos you're watching on being burnt is about Boxes that were stored in our other honey shed.
	There was over 10,000 in those two bays.
	They did six tests and two bays came back with some spores.
	From that, they decided to burn everything.
	They didn't mark the boxes that they tested, and we would have been happy to eliminate those boxes.
	But the reality is, even those boxes were too low to infect a beehive.
	And that is not the scientific way we do it.
	All our boxes are put on pellets, wrapped, and then have traceability because we're organic.
	You could, if they wanted to, they could bring into New Zealand and allow New Zealand an organic vaccine that just treats the Queen.
	And then all of these are AFB3 and they wouldn't have this disease.
	Well, as you heard him, they destroyed 10,000 boxes because they ran a test.
	And they found in two boxes, two boxes, they ran six tests.
	In two boxes, they found spores.
	Now, no bees were sick.
	No bees were infected.
	And they only found this in two boxes, but they destroyed 10,000.
	This is the way they're going to destroy our food supply.
	This is the way they're going to establish, you know, you control our food, control our water, you control us.
	It's just that simple.
	And as we get closer and closer to the fourth turning and the great reset and all the rest of this stuff, they're moving to these larger tactics that are going to allow them to shut everything down.
	And this is exactly what they're doing with bird flu and cattle.
	What they did with these bees.
	I got another picture here. Now, the overlay here that says live bees burned alive, that's not true, but whoever put that over that, I couldn't find the original.
	They didn't have that on it. That was pushed around.
	They were not burned alive, but there he is looking at it, the guy you just saw.
	Had to put those out there and had to light it on fire himself.
	Or he would go to jail.
	That's the amazing thing about all this.
	You will own nothing. They will own everything.
	You will not be able to grow your own food.
	They will tell you what they can do.
	And they'll do it on the basis of, well, we've got something that has a potential to get something sick.
	This is like pre-crime, folks.
	This is pre-pandemic.
	This is pre-disease.
	This is pre-illness. It's like pre-crime.
	And of course, you know, you don't lock people up before a crime is committed, thinking that it's going to happen.
	But that's the way they're running this disease pandemic stuff.
	It's being run like Minority Report pre-crime.
	A New Zealand beekeeper, $2 million out of pocket after being ordered to destroy thousands of hives by authorities who found traces of Of American fowl brood disease.
	Now, they didn't find they found spores.
	These spores can be there for quite some time.
	They don't necessarily infect the bees.
	The director, Stephen Brown, you just heard, says he faced criminal charges and prosecution if he did not destroy his hives, even though the disease itself was not detected.
	This is what the New Zealand Herald said.
	The New Zealand Herald points out, even though the disease was not detected.
	The spores are something that may or may not.
	It could be there for decades.
	And it may or may not get bees sick.
	But he said, even with that, he said everything is individually labeled.
	Didn't have to destroy everything.
	Could have just taken what was there.
	I would have happily done that, he said.
	They ran six tests.
	Two of them came back having AFB spores.
	They did not find any clinical disease there.
	I'm just absolutely flabbergasted.
	You just have to comply with them or you end up in prison.
	And there is no compensation available to the beekeepers in this situation.
	Now, you just have to destroy your inventory.
	I'm not going to pay you for it.
	And this is just unbelievable.
	You have no way out of it, he said.
	Whether they're right or they're wrong, they will prosecute you immediately.
	He believes the spore levels were well below the infecting level.
	Does this sound familiar? Oh, we got a PCR test here.
	Oh, really? Yeah, you've magnified it by 1.1 trillion times?
	There's not enough there to get anybody sick.
	But you say it's a positive test.
	This lie. This is a PCR tool to rule the world.
	That's how they're going to run it.
	And I don't know if this is done with a PCR test or not, but it's this whole idea that if we find some microscopic trace of something that could lead to something, even though nothing and no one is sick, kill everything, destroy everything. This is really dangerous.
	We've got to stop this.
	This is a new procedure for them as well.
	They're coming up with things.
	As I said, they're closing in on the end of the fourth turning end.
	They've got to accelerate things.
	They're coming up with these bogus excuses.
	And because we have not pushed back hard enough on the PCR test and all that nonsense, they're going to keep running this in various forms, the same playbook.
	So the North American Foul Brood Management Agency Is a quasi-government agency that they put together for this.
	And they said they will not, the New Zealand Herald said, so what was the spore count?
	Well, I'm not telling you. What?
	Oh, it is commercially sensitive, they said.
	It's in their interest not to tell you what it is.
	If they were to tell people what it was, people would, are you kidding me?
	You destroyed $2 million worth of his stuff there because of that?
	That tiny trace amount?
	How in the world could you justify something like that?
	You couldn't. And so what do they do?
	They just clam up and they don't talk.
	And they will not give you the data.
	It's just like these people who were trying to shut down the world over climate issues.
	Not going to show you the data. Nope, can't see it.
	Can't see it. She wants people to understand that spores alone can spread the disease.
	It doesn't have to go from bee to bee, she said.
	They are highly resistant.
	They can survive in nature for over 30 years.
	And for over 30 years, they may not infect any bees whatsoever.
	Well, because we found two of them, we've got to destroy 10,000 boxes.
	It can be quite confronting in that way, but I do want to assure people that while it is a quite destructive method, it has to be done to protect our sector, she said.
	Her sector. Their sector of the economy?
	I don't know. But, you know, absolutely unrepentant about all of that, as they have always been about all of this stuff.
	Don't really care.
	Absolutely no sympathy for what their blunt force trauma methods did, whether they work or not.
	No concern as to the damage that they do.
	No concern about trying to mitigate the damage.
	This is a raw power play, folks.
	So the beekeeper is concerned.
	Those regulating the disease do not have sufficient training.
	She said, well, many of the inspectors are beekeepers themselves.
	Well, what are the other ones?
	Are they trained? The management agency does not enjoy destroying beekeepers' livelihoods, she said.
	We'll have to take her word on it.
	I'm not so sure if they enjoy it or not.
	You know, going back to the pandemic, it seemed like Jab Sinda Arden took a great deal of pleasure in destroying people's lives.
	Let me just play that for you, what she used to do.
	So, you Yeah, she enjoys it too.
	I think it was less because necessarily of the elimination determining that and more because we, of course, We've maintained, and actually we have managed very high vaccination rates, generally, without the use of certificates.
	But actually what has become clear to me is that they're not just a tool to drive up vaccines.
	They're a tool for confidence.
	People who have been vaccinated will want to know that they're around other vaccinated people.
	They want to know that they're in a safe environment.
	It is a way that we can give confidence To those who are going back into hospitality.
	It's a confidence game. And so that is something that I think we should offer to people who have been vaccinated.
	That confidence that we're doing everything we can to keep them safe and that they can come back out and start enjoying those things safely.
	Have you ever seen anyone as giddy with power?
	As callous to the harm that she does to other people?
	As Jabsinda Arden?
	I mean, maybe Disney should think about her as an evil queen.
	If they really wanted to do something.
	She's out there with her poison apples and poison injections and stuff.
	Isn't that amazing? And I can imagine that that's probably the same attitude as this woman who's running this bee agency and burning stuff left and right.
	What has to be done? I take no joy in it.
	Oh, you don't? You don't take joy in it like Jab Cinda did?
	And so... There is another organization, besides the one that was given governmental powers to jail and to destroy.
	This is another organization that has been put together by the beekeepers to push back against this quasi-governmental organization.
	It's always that way, right? It's like a CDC or something.
	It's called the New Zealand Beekeeping Incorporated.
	It represents a lot of different beekeepers across the country.
	Its president said the test had only been developed in recent years.
	And argued that it was not what beekeepers signed up for in the country's pest management plan.
	But, again, they're unrepentant.
	We've got cases here.
	We've got boxes.
	Boxes of cases. No, two boxes.
	Test positive. Well, destroy 10,000.
	If we don't take this destruction method, then we run the risk of affecting other hives of other beekeepers, and the problem will just proliferate.
	Yeah. We got spores here.
	We got cases here. Destroy it.
	This is, in a metaphor, what they did to everyone during the Trump administration and continued on through the Biden administration.
	Brown, the beekeeper, claims that he spent $50,000 a year fighting AFB, that disease.
	And that he followed protocol when his hives became infected.
	Again, 10,000 boxes were $2 million.
	They only found two of them. There was no compensation.
	Thousands of the boxes were never tested, but were instead burnt on the basis that they were, quote, potentially, unquote, contaminated.
	Potentially. This is why I say it's pre-crime.
	It's pre-disease.
	It's pre-pandemic. It's I do whatever I want.
	And that's their flimsy justification.
	We don't have cases.
	We don't have anybody sick. And we're seeing this all over the place, aren't we?
	With bird flu. They keep testing everything in the world.
	Well, I think, you know, if I magnify with a PCR test, I think I see a little bit.
	Yes, yes, I do. I do.
	I see a little bit of degraded viral DNA that we're looking for here.
	Whatever. Not DNA, but I see degraded components of this.
	Oh, okay, so now we're going to kill the entire herd, or the entire flock, or whatever.
	He said, it's just like they're ripping your soul out.
	A good part of these boxes are brand new boxes.
	They'd never, ever been on a beehive, and there's no disease in them.
	See, we have food production being politicized, folks.
	They go after this guy.
	They go after Amos Miller, who's doing organic farming on his own, right?
	You've got to be a part of their system.
	You've got to be in the club.
	You've got to be part of Big Agra, or they want to destroy you.
	That's why they're going after raw milk so hard with the bird flu scare.
	This is our chance to shut it down, right?
	We found it in some milk.
	Why were you looking in milk? Why didn't you look in the eggs, right?
	If it's bird flu, if it's coming from chickens, why didn't you look in the eggs?
	No, no, they looked in the milk.
	They found it in a few places and said, well, it's not going to get anybody sick, but yeah, we've got to shut down raw milk.
	Dingle denied the agency had a lot of power.
	And this is somebody else in the agency besides the other person who was in charge of it.
	It was industry funded, but they had certain powers given to it by government, including the ability to enter property without permission, without permission, no warrant, right?
	And demand that gear be burned within seven days.
	Or you go to jail.
	So, asked whether beekeepers had any way to contest an order to destroy gear.
	He said, I don't know.
	Never been in that situation before.
	Nobody's ever pushed back.
	Well, they know that they would vindictively destroy their entire farm.
	Because he's got a large operation.
	Even though they did $2 million worth of damage, even though they destroyed 10,000 boxes, he has a very large operation.
	He has 150 tons of Manuka honey annually they sell.
	He has 3,000 different hives.
	I don't know how that corresponds to boxes.
	But again, they said it's not just about one beekeeper.
	It's about all beekeepers, right?
	It's like your hive protects others.
	It truly is a hive mindset, isn't it?
	Yeah. Wear the mask because your mask doesn't protect you.
	It protects other people. Get the MMR vaccine because, you know, you're getting an MMR vaccine doesn't actually protect you against measles, they say.
	Oh, and then same thing with the COVID stuff.
	Well, Judy Mikovics had an interesting statement about this.
	But before we get to that, though, Dr.
	Peter McCullough said the state of Michigan just declared a bird flu emergency over this weekend.
	They are now PCR testing animals to create an artificial crisis.
	That's exactly what this is.
	Here's what he has to say.
	Is this bird flu just another...
	election coming scam. What is it?
	Bird flu now we have credible evidence that it's gain of function research again being done in US laboratories this time. The Athens, Georgia, US Poultry Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
	We can identify even this gain-of-function strain.
	I mean, CDC Director Redfield, the former director, came on national TV and said it's gain-of-function research.
	You know, so this has now become very clear.
	It's perfectly timed ahead of this WHO meeting to try to, you know, bring in the U.S. and everyone else under this global treaty control.
	What they're doing now is they are doing mass PCR testing of animals creating this artificial crisis.
	And then mass culling or destruction of poultry, they're going to create a food shortage.
	In reality, bird flu can be treated in humans with modern-day treatment and early detection.
	We shouldn't lose a single life with bird flu.
	Probably only the animal handlers are at risk anyway.
	And the bird flu scare, which is disease X, the Global Vaccine Alliance says it is disease X, Yeah, and I want to largely agree with what he has to say.
	It really is about ginning up fear.
	It's about creating an artificial crisis.
	There's not anything that's real there.
	As a matter of fact, if you look at...
	They did not destroy all of the bees at that bee farm.
	I don't know. Those were empty boxes.
	I don't think they had the bees there. So, did the bees leave those boxes?
	Are they going to go merge in with other hives?
	Or do they die? What happens if they weren't burned alive?
	I don't know. I don't know anything about the bees.
	But wouldn't you think... That, you know, they didn't find any sick bees.
	They found some spores. And so if they didn't burn the bees alive...
	Or if the bees aren't going to die, if they can't get back into their particular box, if they're just hung out to dry and they starve to death, essentially, or something, then what sense does that make anyway?
	If you got the bees from these supposedly potentially infected boxes, even though they didn't find any disease anywhere, If you don't kill the bees, are they going to merge in somewhere else?
	But what he had to say, I take issue with a couple of things he had to say.
	It is about creating another scare, another pandemic.
	And I think that we don't want to feed that by saying that it's gain of function.
	Folks, nobody's getting sick with this.
	You talk about gain-of-function, and I see that a lot now from the conservative press.
	And, of course, nobody wants to talk about stopping the gain-of-function, and nobody's doing anything to stop it.
	The Republicans will talk about it.
	They'll talk about how Fauci did it, but they won't talk about stopping it.
	It was stopped in 2014.
	During the Obama administration, because of the expose of Allison Young at USA Today, talking about all the different accidents they had of releasing diseased animals into the wild out of these labs and stuff, they said, let's stop it.
	And they stopped it in 2014, except that Fauci and Collins continued to do it.
	University of North Carolina, they did it.
	And China, they did it. And several other places.
	And then just boldly put out the research that they had in defiance of the Congress, of the Obama administration telling them to stop it.
	And then in 2017, the Trump administration said, let's go with it.
	Let's, you know, take off the moratorium.
	And so the question is, why is the Uni Party not doing anything about this?
	No Republicans, no Democrats are talking about shutting down the gain of function, except when you hear the conservative media, they always want to talk about gain of function.
	And all that does is legitimize the fear and the panic about a pandemic that's being put out there by the mainstream media.
	Folks, there is no gain of function that we have to worry about with this stuff.
	That's a game that they're playing.
	And the conservative media, in many cases, is doing their work for them.
	They're not going to shut down this gain-of-function stuff.
	Yes, they could release diseased animals, but there is no gain-of-function involved here.
	It has not jumped from one species to another.
	It has not jumped to man.
	They keep talking about, oh, we've got a case, we've got a case, we've got a case in Texas.
	You've got a guy who had pink eye.
	He's working at a dairy.
	Did he not wash his hands and rub his eyes?
	Because that could give him pink eye.
	It's conjunctivitis.
	You don't die from conjunctivitis.
	As I said before, I had it many times when I was a very young child in Florida, when we didn't have air conditioning in the schools and stuff.
	It's not something that is serious.
	And if that's all you get from bird flu, then why don't they shut up about this stuff?
	But instead they say, well, we've had a human case.
	We've had a human case. Oh, I don't think you did.
	But there's two things about this, two objectives.
	Number one, they want central control of food.
	And so they can control you.
	They want to make it scarce, and they want to centrally control it.
	Number two, they want to vaccinate the population through the food.
	That's what they need to be talking about.
	Forget about all this stuff about gain-of-function and everything.
	Trump is not your guy anyway.
	He's the one who re-legalized gain-of-function in his administration.
	And Fauci, the guy, the elf that he had running Operation Warp Street, and Francis Collins, they defied Congress and the government and continued to spend funds on that.
	Congress said, no, you will not spend any funds on gain-of-functional research.
	They did it anyway.
	And so you have to understand that this whole herd mentality lie that they've been telling everybody.
	You got to get vaccinated to protect other people.
	Nobody believes that anymore.
	Nobody wants any of their concocted vaccines anymore.
	And so they're going to have to, instead of trying this herd immunity thing, instead of trying to trick you with a herd mentality, they're going to go to the literal herds and they're going to vaccinate them with mRNA or whatever and make a lot of money and then vaccinate you through the food supply.
	Can't people see this?
	Stop talking about gain of function.
	There is no gain of function, but there is a vaccine they want to vaccinate all the cows with so they can contaminate all of the meat.
	And that's one of the reasons why they're coming after the organic farmers and why they want to shut everything up.
	The only person who understands that, by the way, It's Thomas Massey.
	I think the other ones understand it as well.
	He's the only one who's honest enough to get to the source.
	He puts up a thing to shut down the Federal Reserve.
	He puts up a thing to the Prime Act to support farmers like Amos Miller or anybody who has any livestock that they want to slaughter on their own farm or their own home or something like that for food.
	You should be able to do that.
	But that's what's truly behind this.
	So yeah, we have to understand that he's right and he understands, McCullough understands, that this is artificial.
	Artificial pandemic.
	They're trying to panic everybody.
	But if you understand that, shut up about the gain-of-function stuff.
	It's not real. And you're panicking people.
	And a lot of people in the conservative press are doing that.
	And we need to push back against that.
	Don't let them panic you.
	Oh, it's disease X. WHO says so.
	It's not. It's not a pandemic.
	Nobody is sick. Not even that one Texas worker.
	And then you got Judy Mikovic, who makes a very important point.
	I disagree with some of the stuff that she has to say, but she makes a very important point about how she said, you know, prior to 2019, now they're all about mRNA vaccines for everything, right?
	But what did they do before that, in 2019 and earlier?
	What did they do for flu vaccine?
	They would make the flu vaccines by incubating them in chicken eggs.
	Oh, isn't that interesting?
	Now we're talking about bird flu after you created all your flu vaccines in chicken eggs?
	What an interesting combination.
	And of course, I talked about that many times, how they would...
	And that's one of the things they talked about with Operation Warp Speed.
	Typically, what we do with these vaccines is we put them in, you know, we gin up something in chicken eggs.
	And it takes a while for it to develop.
	And then we do this and that and, you know.
	But we want to short-circuit all of that.
	We want your body to manufacture the antigens.
	And that's what the mRNA is about.
	The mRNA goes in and reprograms your body to manufacture the antigens.
	So we don't have to manufacture them in chicken eggs.
	What could possibly go wrong?
	That's why I called them genetic code injections from the very beginning.
	But I didn't talk about the...
	I think this is an important connection to make that Judy Mikovic does.
	The fact that they've always done these vaccines through the eggs.
	There she is. Just to be clear, every flu shot before 2019 was made in what?
	Chicken eggs.
	It isn't always was.
	Infection by injection.
	Just going back to bird flu.
	Come on, folks. How dumb, really, are we?
	Where did we make all our flu vaccines until the universal synthetic vaccine that unwittingly President Trump was conned into signing into law by Fauci and company in September of 2021 before our book Plague of Corruption came out and of course the movie, which had already been written.
	So folks, just to be clear, every flu shot before 2019 was made in what?
	Chicken eggs.
	So do you think you're going to get a bird coronavirus, a flu virus?
	Check back to my friend, Dr.
	Cherry Tenpenny, and see that they use specific pathogen-free eggs.
	Oh, which specific pathogens don't they look for?
	Oh, coronaviruses from birds.
	Yeah, that's exactly right.
	That's a good point. That's a good point.
	Even though I disagree with her, Trump did not unwittingly do it.
	He was not conned into doing it.
	Come on, folks.
	If he's that stupid, he pushed it for another three years.
	He just recently pulled back against it, but now we can pretend that he never knew and was never on board the entire time.
	Really? Really?
	And of course, this is being put out by her.
	She's hitting up Clay Clark, who's with the Reawaken Trump bandwagon tour that's out there.
	I understand that's their business model.
	But the truth actually matters.
	Trump was the con.
	Trump was the one who was there because the left wants to do whatever the government tells them.
	They're clamoring for safety.
	They can't get enough safety.
	They don't want liberty at all.
	The right would typically look at this and say, wait a minute, you're promising me some safety, but you want to take some of my liberty?
	No, not going to do it.
	So they put Trump in. And they tell everybody he's an anti-globalist, and then he marches in lockstep with every globalist government doing the exact same things at exactly the same time.
	And now, as part of this, again, we have Robert Redfield, who was the CDC director for Trump.
	I've lost track of how many times he's been on.
	It's been at least three different times.
	Saying, you know, we've got a pandemic here.
	We've got to panic about all of this stuff.
	Here's what he has to say to get the Trump cult to believe and gain a function again.
	Pushing all the panic buttons about gain a function.
	Robert Redfield, Trump's CDC liar, part of the Operation Warp Speed team.
	I'm obviously most worried about bird flu. Right now that takes five amino acid change for it to be effectively infecting humans. That's a pretty heavy species barrier, but this virus is already now in 26 mammal species, as you saw most recently cattle. But in the laboratory I could make it highly infectious for humans in months because it's been published the five amino acids that I need to change. And so I don't think that research should be done.
	That's the real threat. That's the real biosecurity threat that these university labs are doing these bi...
	See the fear campaign?
	Now we got this thing, it's really easy to make this stuff, but hey, I can't stop them.
	They're just going to do it. And everybody's like, oh no, it's inevitable.
	We're all going to die from something, some gain-of-function thing that found you, and we can't stop it.
	No. He's lying to you.
	And then we have Mitt Romney.
	Well, first of all, you would have expected that the lessons that we learned with COVID, as well as the lessons on the baby food shortage, would have led our various government agencies to say, we need to be able to collect better data, look at trends in data, identify threats before they become severe.
	Yeah, you're the threat.
	That hasn't happened. You and people like you.
	We identified you, Mitt.
	...to the so-called bird flu. We have the Department of Agriculture that's doing some work.
	We have the CDC, which is doing some work, and other agencies as well.
	But the coordination of their data gathering has not been as extensive as I'd like to see it.
	They haven't been able to communicate yet to the American people that they're fully on top of this terrible...
	You know what I think we need? We've got the CDC. They're doing some wonderful stuff.
	And we've got the FDA, and they're doing some wonderful stuff, and the USDA. Doesn't this sound like 9-11?
	I think we need to have, you know, the FBI was doing its stuff, and the CIA, they were all so wonderful, and the NSA, they were so wonderful.
	But, you know, we still had 9-11, and so we need to create a new, powerful bureaucracy.
	We'll call it Homeland Security.
	They're going to come up with something like that, I predict.
	Just to make, always want to centralize stuff, always want to make it more and more of a bureaucracy.
	And they will run this stuff pre-crime.
	And as I've said from the very beginning, you have to understand these pandemics, especially what happened in 2020 with Trump.
	That was the second shoe to drop from 9-11.
	You know, the dark winter two months before 9-11, the anthrax attack one week after, the model state health emergency powers acts sent out to the states two months after that.
	Declares an emergency to give money to the states to do what they gave themselves the power to do over the preceding 20 years as the CIA and its ilk practiced this very thing for 20 years.
	Lock everybody down. Come up with a novel vaccine.
	Make that the condition of getting out of your lockdown again.
	A jail term. A jail term.
	We're going to jail the population and show them who's boss.
	Yeah, we learned a lesson, didn't we?
	I hope that when I look at this, I looked up the vaccination rates.
	By the way, Tennessee was like the second or third least vaccinated of the states.
	And so I looked up the vaccination rates overall.
	And, you know, if their numbers are true, because they do vary quite a bit from these different ones.
	So I don't know who's telling you the truth.
	I don't know if they're deliberately lying or they just don't know.
	But, you know, we look at it and it's about a third of the country did not get vaccinated.
	And, you know, especially the second shot, there's a big difference between the number of people Who took the first shot?
	They say, well, you know, maybe about 80% of the people took the first shot.
	Maybe about 65% took the second shot.
	Or in some cases, it's, you know, the low 50s.
	But in every state, they say more than 50% of the people got the second shot.
	But still, you're looking at a massive resistance.
	Even if you only say 25% or 30%, you're looking at like 50, 60 million people out there.
	Like you, like me, who said, no way.
	No way am I going to comply with this.
	Absolutely will not comply with this.
	Now, this is what Trump is out there saying now.
	And I retweeted that clip that I played last week.
	And I said, yeah, when Trump was out there telling everybody, you know, this last week, well, you know what they're going to do?
	They're going to try to lock everybody down like what happened in 2020 and, you know, mess with the election or anything.
	It's like, you did all of that stuff.
	And he says, we just got to tell them we won't comply.
	And I retweeted and I said, yeah, that's what I said to Trump in 2020.
	I will not comply. And I said he's rigging the elections when he did vote by mail and all the rest of the stuff.
	But folks, understand that what they're doing now to collapse our food supply, to destroy independent farms, is they're going to be doing this pre-crime, pre-pandemic approach.
	A fake pandemic, all based on numbers and cases and PCR tests, and we found spores but no sick bees, but let's kill, you know, 10,000 boxes when we found spores in two of them that no sick bees.
	So we have bird flu hitting New York City.
	This was curated and passed on the, put up on the Drudge Report.
	But no such thing.
	No such thing.
	Humans are told to stay alert after a new pandemic warning.
	Well, they said that they found six birds who tested positive for avian influenza, including a red-tailed hawk, three Canadian geese, and a peregrine falcon.
	Well, that must have been pretty fast to catch that guy.
	Fastest animal in the world, a peregrine falcon.
	Right, Travis? And we just had a joke about that this last week.
	He was able to go to Dollywood with some friends, and they were bringing out wild birds, predator birds, like falcons and stuff like that, and predatory birds.
	And so they said, what is the fastest?
	Ha, ha, ha. What is the fastest?
	And he spoiled the punchline for him.
	He said it was a Bergen falcon.
	And they found a chicken as well.
	A chicken. Now, I'm not surprised that they have wild birds that are flying over New York City.
	But they found a chicken in New York City?
	That's what I'm amazed at.
	Not that they blew a positive PCR test.
	You can do that with anything. I'm just surprised they found a chicken in New York City.
	Outside of KFC, when you go to NYC, you're not going to find any chickens on the street.
	Volunteers in a community science project.
	They call it the virus hunters.
	Yeah, this is like, you know, the little Hitler Youth or the Stasi.
	Bring me the bird and I'll find the disease.
	Yeah. They collected feces from just under 2,000 birds between 2022 and 2023.
	Oh, wait a minute. Is this recent?
	It's not clear from this article that is pushing this fake headline that Whether this is recent or not.
	Samples from six birds tested positive.
	And then they list these birds again.
	And so, was that, did they find six samples from 2,000 birds that tested positive?
	Were these birds sick and dead?
	No, no.
	It's kind of like the Monty Python skit.
	This bird is not dead!
	You don't have to bang it on the table.
	But it said that they collected 2,000 species between 2022 and 2023, various urban parks and everything.
	Samples from six birds tested positive.
	So, is this something from 2023?
	And is this six samples?
	From 2,000 bird feces that tested positive?
	Without any birds dying or being sick?
	But because of that, you should not be able to get any meat or dairy in New York City, you see?
	Therefore, she's made of wood because, you know, science.
	Again, it's like Monty Python.
	Well, Roy, scientists say that while the presence of bird flu and Big Apple poses a low risk to humans and pets, Because they'd be laughed out of New York if they said otherwise.
	They should be laughed out for this.
	You found six out of 2,000 positive?
	And that two years ago?
	Two years ago?
	Show me your dead pigeon, okay?
	Is it new that people have to be concerned about getting diseases from birds?
	You know, you don't just go out and pick up feathers that you find there.
	And if you see a little kid, does it?
	Stop it. Don't touch. That's dirty.
	Is that something that's new?
	Do we have to have virus hunters, a team of virus hunters with maybe their little merit badges and stuff from Eric Adams to go out and do this?
	Though the latest strains of highly pathogenic avian influenza.
	That sounds impressive, doesn't it?
	Pathogenic avian influenza.
	Bird flu. I've been in the city for at least two years.
	This is another thing that makes me think this is old news.
	Yeah, you know, two years ago we had 2,000 people go out and they found six samples and they attributed it to these six birds, they think.
	Really? And now this is headline news?
	You're dredging this stuff up?
	You see how artificial this pandemic is?
	Don't buy any of it.
	Don't buy it even from people who otherwise give you good information, like Dr.
	McCullough. This is not gain of function that you have to worry about.
	This is gain of Bolshevik, to put it lightly.
	It's not bird excrement.
	It's bovine excrement that they're selling you here.
	So, it's already been in the city for at least two years and there's been no human cases.
	But, we had a farm worker in Texas fell ill from bird flu.
	He got pink eye.
	And then the very next sentence, the bird flu can be quite fatal.
	No, no, not at all.
	He got pink eye.
	And to say, they don't say fatal.
	They say quite fatal.
	Oh, they killed him dead, you know?
	I mean... It can be quite fatal.
	This tells you that the juice in this story, if nothing else, does.
	It's just amazing.
	It can be quite fatal pink eye.
	I don't think a single person has ever died from pink eye.
	I could be wrong, but I don't think so.
	And I said, so we need more eyes on the ground.
	Well, if you do that, you're probably going to get pink eye.
	Keep your eye off the ground.
	Wash your hands when you're dealing with cattle.
	And maybe you won't get pink eye.
	And certainly not bird flu.
	Because that's not anything you really have to worry about.
	But this is everywhere.
	Fox News. This is what they were running about the human who got the bird flu.
	Yeah.
	Pink eye.
	Pink eye.
	Captured media.
	Fox News. Fox News, your sponsor's showing.
	I can see your sponsor sticking out from underneath your coattail.
	Then we've got mainstream media.
	They do their little hit piece.
	Good evening. Since the first case of bird flu was transmitted from a cow to a human, officials have warned the public to expect more human cases ahead.
	The H5N1 strain of bird flu was discovered recently to have infected a Yeah, you get the idea.
	And then there's the WHO. This virus now evolves and develops the ability to infect humans and then critically the ability to go from human to human transmission.
	This guy is a chief scientist at the WHO who's been lying to us about all this stuff for years.
	500 cases so far of humans, the mortality rate is extraordinarily high.
	To me, this is a major...
	Can't survive that conjunctivitis.
	The current outbreak, for want of a better word, in America amongst cows is really concerning as well and also talks to this issue of transmission.
	We have to understand in those cows...
	Every bit of that is a lie.
	Every bit of that is a lie.
	Call these people out.
	I am so sick and tired of these liars.
	America's dairy cow replacement inventory collapses to a two-decade low.
	That's what they're coming after, folks.
	They don't make any secret about it, as I played it last week, Eric Adams, years ago.
	Yeah, we're starting to monitor all the meat and dairy that people are consuming.
	They're not monitoring at that point in time.
	They weren't monitoring meat and dairy for some bird flu.
	They were monitoring you.
	Are you eating it?
	Because you can't. We want to make sure that we cut down on your meat and dairy.
	And we're not going to allow that to be put in the schools because we have come together with this C40 thing.
	You know what that was? C40. Is that for cities?
	Well, that's what they said. It said it was for 40 cities.
	Actually, the C stands for conspiracy.
	It was a conspiracy of 40 high-level politicians who Like Sadiq Khan in London and Bloomberg in New York, C40 was a conspiracy of 40 elitists that has now grown to a conspiracy of over 100 elitists in 100 cities in the United States, or worldwide, I should say.
	And their conspiracy was to monitor your consumption and make sure you're not going to get any of that stuff.
	That's what this is always about.
	And so now, another part of the media campaign that has ramped up, coming from the FDA, is to call people idiots and fools who drink raw milk.
	Just as we're having this stuff come out, saying, well, you know, they were ivermectin, right?
	Stop it! You people are idiots!
	This is for horses!
	And now they're saying, raw milk is for cows!
	Stop consuming it!
	As one person pointed out, whenever the FDA says to not do something, it's kind of a Streisand effect.
	Maybe we need to change that.
	Instead of it being the Streisand effect, we need to call it the FDA effect.
	Because they have lied to us and told us exactly the opposite on so many things.
	That you want to do exactly the opposite of what they do.
	You know, just like Jim Cramer at CNN. When he tells you to buy or sell, you do exactly the opposite.
	You want to do what Nancy Pelosi's husband does.
	He's the one who knows how to invest.
	Well, it's the same thing with this other stuff.
	Pasteurization, a process in which milk is rapidly heated, it's cooked, designed to kill bacteria and potential pathogens in the dairy.
	The process, however, destroys and deactivates a number of important enzymes, amino acids, vitamins, minerals, and other healthy bacteria, writes WinePress.
	The Weston A. Price Foundation has a number of articles explaining the negatives of this process.
	And again, if you go to this article on WinePress, they have a link to the Weston A. Price Foundation.
	Explain the negatives of this process and the pros of raw dairy.
	Raw milk, which humans have consumed for millennia in situations that were far more unsanitary than we live in today, by the way.
	Raw milk and dairy are still illegal to sell at grocery stores in most of the United States.
	And they want it completely illegal.
	This is why the CDC and the FDA are now demonizing raw milk like they demonized ivermectin, and it's just as absurd, if not more so.
	Because we only had about 60 or 70 years worth of history with ivermectin, right?
	To know what the safety profile of it was.
	They had a problem because it was being used off-label.
	In other words, they had not specifically run any test, but we had a lot of information that was done right away when it was brought in and all of a sudden everybody's getting well from the ivermectin.
	And we saw this at the national level.
	I mean, we're talking about millions of people in a massive experiment, but they wouldn't acknowledge it.
	And they said, well, because we have not approved it for that specific thing, it's unapproval.
	It's just off-label use, and doctors have always used drugs off-label.
	It's gone through its safety profiles.
	It's been used for condition X. Now we'd like to test it and see if it's of any value with condition Y. That's always been allowed by the FDA. They've never tried to take people's licenses, whether they're doctors or pharmacists, for doing something like that.
	They've never punished people.
	They've never mocked people.
	They're about a mockery of themselves, actually.
	Mark McAfee, owner of Raw Farm USA in Fresno, California, says, quote, people are seeking raw milk like crazy.
	Anything the FDA tells our customers to do, they do the opposite.
	But then you've got these news outlets like Gizmodo, and this has been promoted endlessly.
	I've seen this Gizmodo article picked up and run through, but it's not the only one.
	Gizmodo says, raw milk sales skyrocket as idiots believe drinking bird flu will give them immunity.
	Nobody's drinking bird flu.
	Talk about a dishonest, what shills these people are.
	That's as stupid as that ivermectin ad tweet by the FDA. That's horse medication.
	Stop it, y'all. This is even more ridiculous from Gizmodo.
	Matt Novak, the author of that article, lambasted those who drink raw milk.
	Matt, you need to get a new job.
	Maybe the CIA, if you work for them, they might pay you a little bit more if you work for them directly than Gizmodo.
	He said, please don't drink raw milk at any time, especially not now.
	Despite claims that there are nutritional benefits to raw milk, that's simply not true, according to the FDA, which we don't believe, and you should not believe.
	As a matter of fact, you know, you lose some of the positive benefits of the pasteurization stuff.
	But with raw milk, and of course the dairy that we go to, it is pasteurized, so they can sell it.
	But it is not homogenized.
	That's the thing that's really negative.
	So you miss the raw milk by pasteurizing it, you lose some of the positive benefits of it.
	But by not having it homogenized, First of all, there's a lot more cream in it.
	It's amazing to look at this dairy's milk compared to the milk that you get in the grocery store, which is bleach white.
	Their milk is cream colored because they haven't skimmed it all off or a large part of it.
	And you don't get the homogenization, which makes it difficult.
	It has some negative health benefits, a lot of negative health benefits.
	Anyway, he says, the lone claim that holds up is that raw milk tastes better.
	Yes, it does. Something that's obviously a matter of taste, and that's a really stupid reason to get very, very sick.
	Well, nobody's...
	You're the stupid one.
	You're the idiot. You're pretending that everybody's getting sick.
	You say in your headline that people are drinking bird flu from having cow's milk.
	You're an absolute idiot.
	This is like...
	This guy, Matt Novak of Gizmodo, he's a preview of what people say is going to happen to artificial intelligence as it starts consuming its own product, right?
	It's like mad cow disease or Yakov Creutzfeldt disease or something.
	You start to lose your mind.
	That's what this guy's doing. He's consuming too much mainstream media and he can't think anymore.
	He can't think anymore. There are a number of mainstream reports published this week so far that have guided drinking raw milk.
	And here's some of the titles.
	I like this from Winepress.
	Raw milk enthusiasts demand milk infected with bird flu.
	Another one. Raw milk sales are surging because people think drinking bird flu makes them immune.
	And these are tech sites.
	Here's the independent in the UK. Bird flu and health warnings won't stop raw milk drinkers getting their fix.
	It's like it's a drug or something, right?
	Getting their fix.
	No, it's just what humanity has consumed for thousands of years.
	Since time began, essentially.
	And done it, as I said, under much, much less sanitary conditions than we have today.
	Raw milk, says PBS, raw milk sales spike despite the CDC's warning of risks.
	I would say because.
	Because. Stat News, a pharmaceutical publication.
	My rendezvous with the raw milk black market.
	Black market.
	They can at least call it a white market.
	Quick, easy, and unchecked by the FDA. Oh, we need more regulation, don't we?
	Yeah. Absolutely stunning, says Fortune magazine.
	Food safety experts amazed as raw milk sales surge amid budding bird flu crisis.
	Yeah, because the two are not connected at all.
	And because there is no crisis, except in the media.
	You have to read and watch the media to think that there's a pandemic, just like back in 2020.
	Raw milk is growing in popularity, but is it safe to drink?
	Yeah, it is. Again, Mark McAfee, who had the raw milk outlet, was not quoted in full context by the AP. His full quote was,"...I've had several customers say that whatever the FDA tells them to do, that they will do the opposite." They understand that this is part of an ongoing smear campaign against the industry.
	And they are instead going to listen to their farmer.
	They run out of attacks, and this bird flu scare is only the newest version.
	It is not contagious to humans at all, he said.
	The science shows that there are no genetic markers indicating that it has the capacity to skip to humans.
	None. And in spite of all this stuff about a human, again, it is conjunctivitis.
	It's not bird flu.
	If that's the worst that happens with it, we don't have to worry about it.
	CDC, however, is launching a national dashboard, as I pointed out on Friday, so they can keep you constantly updated with cases, cases, as they continue to expand their testing of wastewater.
	And to monitor it in other ways.
	Yeah, they will never stop.
	One of the key similarities between it and climate change.
	There's a total Bolshevik science that's out there, where they make models and projections, and they don't show you the data just like, well, we're not going to tell you what we tested with these birds that we demanded, the bees that we demanded that he burn.
	I'm not going to give you that information.
	They're not going to tell you, they're going to lie to you about the temperature readings.
	They're going to lie to you about how they took the temperature readings.
	They're going to lie to you about the trends and all the rest of the stuff, just like they lie to you about all the cases with the PCR stuff.
	It's all based on lies.
	And they blinded you with science, as the song goes.
	But it's no science at all.
	They want you to believe that it is science when it isn't.
	We'll be right back. You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	We're going to talk about the artificial intelligence stuff here coming up.
	But before we do, I want to talk a little bit about abortion.
	A couple of amazing stories in here as we talk about science.
	On RockFan, Scott Helmer, thank you very much for the tip, says the entire pandemic was built on the fraud of using the PCR test.
	That's never been exposed to the masses, even though so many have tried.
	So they will put the same fraud again and again.
	Now a bird flu.
	What will it take to wake the sheeple up?
	We're all chained to their ignorance.
	Well, part of it is to get people to wake up to the fact that Trump was not conned.
	Trump was not gaslighted.
	He was the conner.
	The MAGA people are the conies.
	He was the one who was pushing the lies out there to people.
	And he can't be trusted.
	But yeah, the PCR test, it's just amazing.
	They just keep getting away with it.
	And again, we had Kerry Mullis died from respiratory disease a couple of months before they kicked this whole thing off back in 2019.
	In San Diego, University of California, this was sent to me by Roy.
	Thanks for sending this to me. I had not seen it from the college fix.
	And when I saw this, I thought, well, this is an old article at first.
	Planned Parenthood was doing aborted baby parts and selling them, right?
	And this is coming out of the Center for Medical Progress, David Daleiden trial that is in California.
	And as they do discovery, They had already found this once before, and that particular one involved the University of Pittsburgh, and they were acting on behalf of and with money from the National Institute of Health.
	And Fauci was ordering baby parts, and Planned Parenthood was killing the babies at the ages of development and so forth they needed.
	And, of course, the babies are selected and born alive so they can get these baby parts.
	Now, this is true of all this. Because they're not going, if they want to use the organs for something, right?
	First of all, they're not going to rip the baby apart, which is one of the ways that they abort them.
	The next one is they're not going to burn them alive or use chemicals to destroy them because they've got to preserve the organs.
	And so just as they do in China, they extract these organs from living people, like the Chinese do it from prisoners and that type of thing.
	Well, they do it to babies at Planned Parenthood.
	And so that one that I, when I first saw this, I thought, oh, is this the same stuff?
	No, that was University of Pittsburgh and that was the NIH, Fauci and Francis Collins.
	This one is slightly different as well because this is not simply about the money.
	There is some apparently quid pro quo being involved here.
	But this is about Planned Parenthood being able to get intellectual property rights from the experiments that are there.
	University of California at San Diego and Planned Parenthood operated an exchange partnership involving aborted baby body parts and scientific research according to newly released documents obtained by a pro-life watchdog organization.
	Center for Medical Progress believes the evidence uncovered through its open records request may be incriminating.
	David Daleiden told the College Fixes organization is calling for a federal investigation.
	Here's the problem.
	David Daleiden and Center for Medical Progress is being persecuted.
	I don't say prosecuted, but persecuted for exposing the truth about murder-for-hire baby parts.
	This is something that had already been brought up in a congressional testimony.
	That's why they did the investigation.
	And they got these people monologuing about how they wanted to buy Lamborghinis and other stuff like that.
	But then the state of California, rather than investigating Planned Parenthood for murder for hire, investigated and charged David Daleiden and the Center for Medical Progress.
	They wanted to shoot the messenger.
	And the people who ran it was the California State Attorney General Lala Harris.
	And then when she got promoted to Senate, she turned it over to Javier Becerra's.
	Now, Lala is vice president, and Javier Becerra is the head of HHS, which Fauci and Collins NIH is part of that.
	So don't expect that there's going to be a federal investigation.
	They do have an inspector general with the HHS. But I don't think, given the policies and the politics and all the rest of the stuff, there's going to be an investigation.
	However, it is important for us to get this information out.
	So they did it.
	The University of California, San Diego.
	Aborted babies in exchange for ownership of the university's patents and intellectual property.
	It was actually the Planned Parenthood was involved in that to get the intellectual property.
	And so, again, you know, the other one was to feed the experiments for Fauci at the University of Pittsburgh so that they could create humanized mice.
	This is because they just want intellectual property rights for whatever it is that they discover.
	The partnership appears to violate federal law which prohibits the transfer of aborted human fetal tissue for valuable consideration.
	One document that they found in this is titled, Biological Materials Transfer Agreement.
	And it is a contract between Planned Parenthood of San Diego and UC San Diego, University of California, San Diego.
	It was signed in 2009 and it was updated in 2014.
	And it gives the university access to fetal and placental tissue, which are proprietary materials of PPSD. That's Planned Parenthood San Diego.
	In exchange, the contract states that Planned Parenthood shall retain all right, title, and interest in and to the material, including but not limited to all right, title, and interest in patents and patent applications and other intellectual property rights relating to the material.
	You see, this could be very valuable when you consider that the moral and ethical objections that a lot of people had to the vaccines Were that they were tested and developed using aborted baby cells.
	And those can go in forever.
	They just keep renewing these cells.
	And so Planned Parenthood, by getting the intellectual property rights, could be getting a revenue stream that is eternal as well.
	That's why they want to do this.
	David Daleiden said he believes Planned Parenthood has made millions of dollars from their partnership with UC San Diego, but his organization is still investigating.
	He said in the years since the proprietary fetuses contract was signed, that's what they call it, proprietary fetuses.
	Think about that.
	We own these babies.
	We own these babies' bodies and the parts that we extract from them.
	Since that contract was signed, one major UCSD, University of California, San Diego, donor, extended $10 million in grant support to Planned Parenthood.
	See, here's where the payoff is, the quid pro quo.
	According to another public records document obtained by Center for Medical Progress, UC San Diego donated $10,000 to a Planned Parenthood fundraising event in 2021.
	So they just seem to do it. You know, $10,001, a $10 million grant, and another.
	Their latest investigation found a similar situation to what they uncovered previously with the University of Pittsburgh.
	That's why I said, I saw this, and it's like, wait, is this old news?
	No, they're different.
	Two different cases. How many of them are there?
	HHS has an office of Inspector General.
	They're investigating the Pennsylvania University's fetal tissue research projects.
	I imagine they'll just look the other way.
	But anyway, approval of these activities and the NIH funded the university's transfer of fetuses from Planned Parenthood in both cases.
	It was funded by Fauci and by Francis Collins.
	Same people out there doing, you know, taking diseases and trying to magnify them, getting animals infected and releasing them, you know.
	But they won't do anything to stop gain-of-function.
	And again, you should not let that panic you.
	In spite of all their incompetence and malice, there's not been a pandemic.
	Not in 2020, and certainly not today.
	We are now calling for HHS, Office of Inspector General, to investigate Planned Parenthood-supplied fetal tissue bank at Pitt.
	Well, you know, maybe Jim Jordan can hold some hearings and do nothing about it.
	And, of course, Machiavelli and Mike Johnson is not going to do anything.
	Because, again, he wants to run as far away from the abortion issue as he possibly can.
	But, you know, the interesting thing is, the so-called self-professing Christian, Machiavellian Mike, if he cared at all about abortion, he could take this and run with it, couldn't he?
	Right? Right? In the same way that, you know, we had this person running for Congress.
	Last year, I recovered the remains of these five babies from an all-term abortion center.
	Yeah, so, you know, they could show this in their congressional campaigns just like she did.
	But they choose not to.
	They choose not to show you the truth about what the aborted babies look like.
	The fact that it is murder.
	You see that commercial?
	You know it's murder.
	Okay. They have chosen not to show you the truth about what our own government is doing.
	They will continue to fund the NIH. They'll continue to fund these humanized mice experiments, this transhumanism.
	They'll continue to fund the murder for hire.
	They will bury it.
	And at the same time, they'll tell everybody, don't talk about abortion.
	It'll cause us to lose the election.
	This could be a win. If these people had any principles, but of course they don't, and we know that.
	Here's somebody that does, though.
	Joan Andrews Bell got a standing ovation.
	This 76-year-old woman, veteran pro-life activist, was sentenced to another 27 months in jail.
	She's already been in jail for eight or nine months.
	And so as she was there at the sentencing hearing, she sang, she's Catholic, she sang Ave Maria, and the people that were there gave her a standing ovation.
	She said, I will not compromise.
	I will not pay a fine.
	I will not say I'm sorry for what I did.
	She is hanging tough in all of this.
	She absolutely refuses.
	She said her husband told LifeSite News via email that she refused to make any compromise that might suggest that there was regret on her part.
	In court, Joan said to the judge, in conscience, I cannot pay any fine and I cannot accept probation as it violates my conscience.
	Wow. Can you imagine if there was just a little bit of that in Mike Johnson or any of these other people, these phony people in Congress?
	Just disgusting to compare them to her.
	What vile, craven, addicted to power, money, and who knows what else these people in Congress are.
	RFK Jr. has now walked back his support for legal abortion up to the moment of birth.
	Now, he says, I support a viability cutoff.
	Who cares? He's already shown what he is. Just like all the rest of it. Just like Trump. Just like Biden.
	They have absolutely no principles. They're flip-flopping.
	No spine. No principles about anything. He'll tell you this today.
	What will he do tomorrow? Who knows? Because the man has no integrity. And that's true whether he's talking about his fantasies, about climate change, or whether he's talking about what he wants to do about free speech.
	He doesn't have any credibility with me whatsoever.
	No more just like Trump, just like Biden.
	In federal court, parents in Maryland School District cannot opt to take their kindergarten through fifth grade students out of an LGBTQ curriculum.
	Can you imagine that? No, you've got to put the very young ones in because that's when we have the most effect on them.
	And I had a listener send me a letter, and she's in Toronto, got her child in a Catholic school, and they're pushing this stuff.
	Because, you know, hey, you've got different jurisdictions, you've got different people running it.
	You know, the Catholic Church is not monolithic.
	A lot of it is like the Pope.
	And so, you know, she said, I can't homeschool.
	And I understand. But I would just say, you know, if you can't homeschool, there are other schools, there are other church schools even, that you can go to where you won't necessarily get this stuff.
	You need to look and see.
	There might be some other church schools that will not do this stuff to your kids.
	But in a federal court in Maryland, they upheld the Maryland school district policy, which will not allow parents to opt out for their young K-5 children.
	They can't opt out of a gaslighting propaganda curriculum to lie to them about gender identity and sexuality.
	Why are you talking to kindergarten through fifth grade kids about gender and sexuality?
	That right there ought to raise concerns about pedophiles.
	And this has been brought, this is being run by the Beckett Fund for Religious Liberty, but they are representing parents who are Muslim, who are Jewish, and who are Christian.
	Nobody likes this stuff.
	Everybody understands what these schools are doing.
	I mean, this is sexual gaslighting.
	These people are pedophiles.
	Why do we turn our children and our institutions over to pedophiles?
	And look at how pervasive it is.
	It's a school district. It's a federal court.
	All of them, you know, from the school to the courts to the federal courts.
	They argued that the district's refusal to allow these Muslim, Jewish, and Christian parents argued that the district's refusal to allow their young children to opt out of reading of, here we go, LGBTQQIAAP2S+. How ridiculous this is.
	How ridiculous this is.
	We just need to laugh at this nonsense.
	These are the themed books.
	They will not allow them to opt out.
	And they said the participation in this curriculum violated their right to raise their children in accordance with their faith.
	Well, if you're going to put your kids in the government school, they're not going to be raised according to your faith.
	And they're not going to be raised according to how your faith defines identity and sexuality.
	The parents also argue that the material is not age-appropriate for such young students.
	Absolutely. K-5?
	The book titles that are integrated into this curriculum, K-5, include The Pride Puppy.
	This is disgusting.
	I mean, you know, they have it at such a juvenile level to sexualize these kids with a pride puppy.
	Uncle Bobby's wedding.
	Born ready. Oh, that sounds like a pedophile book, right?
	Yeah, born ready. Born ready.
	Ready and consent to sex.
	The true story of a boy named Penelope.
	The book, The Pride Puppy, which is the sole test expressly approved for use in pre-kindergarten, Invited the three- and four-year-old audience to look for items such as a drag king, leather, a lip ring, a drag queen, and underwear.
	Okay, well, you know, this is the Brave New Schools, the Sodom and Gomorrah schools that are there.
	And then the New York Times.
	Some conservative Christians are stepping away from the gender wars.
	It's not a gender war.
	It's a spiritual war. They want you to think that it's a gender war.
	And they have a family there that's mother and father and their son, who is now dressing up as a woman.
	And this is a typical way that the establishment press will present their stories.
	You see this all the time from the Washington Post and the New York Times and NPR and everything.
	They begin this by talking about this family, the husband and wife, the mom and dad.
	Well, you know, we were really strong Christians and everything, and then our son, you know, we found out wants to be a female.
	And then they leave it at that.
	And then they give you all their backstory about what their chosen experts have to say about it.
	And then at the very end, they come back, and you know that, especially from looking at the headline, you know these Christians are going to be stepping away from their faith in order to embrace this and to, as they try to put it, show unconditional love.
	It's not unconditional love.
	It's disbelief.
	Disbelief about what God says in His Word, how He describes us as human beings, Disbelief in God's word about what he says about reward, punishment, and sin.
	Disbelief that God will hold people accountable to what he says to them.
	Disbelief that rebellion will be punished.
	Andrew and Debbie James are evangelical Christians born in England.
	The couple moved to Denver years ago and raised their kids there.
	Mr. James has profound religious conversion experience early in parenthood, and their large non-denominational church quickly became the focus of their lives.
	They used to say that if the doors were open, they were there.
	We always joked that we had this perfect little scenario, Mrs.
	James said. We had our boy, then we had our girl, and they were two years apart, and they were just perfect children.
	There were strict parents, says the New York Times.
	Too strict, they say, in hindsight, with a goal to, quote, shield them from absolutely everything.
	Now, let me just say this.
	You know, one of the things that the North Carolina Homeschooling Association called itself was the Greenhouse Report.
	Why did they do that? We weren't raising vegetables.
	We were raising kids.
	And, you know, I remember all the Christians who did not support our homeschooling.
	And they said, you need to put them out in the world of salt and light.
	I said, that time's coming. That time's coming.
	First, they need to be protected and nurtured in a safe environment.
	And then, you know, just like a plant that you raise in the greenhouse, you're going to put that out, and it's going to have to survive or die in the real world, and you never know what's going to happen, do you?
	There comes a time that it comes out of that, but you want to, in its tender and young time, you want to shield it from those types of things.
	I said, so you're telling me that if you're going to have a war, that you're going to send your kindergarten kids to go fight that war?
	Is that right? Is that what you're going to do?
	It's a spiritual war. This is a lot more dangerous than And a lot more complex than any physical war fighting other people is going to be.
	And you're going to send your kids out there?
	You're going to have your kid go up against the person at the front of the class that's got all this power and authority and lords it over them?
	You're going to have your kid stand up against the peer pressure of all the people in that class?
	No, you're not. That kid's not going to be able to stand that.
	Anyway, when the couple's older child was 19, living at home as a college student.
	So here's a kid, you know, kept in a shielded environment.
	They send him off to college, and even though they're still living at home, the college is the thing that can corrupt him.
	Mrs. James got a call from the pharmacy informing her that her child's prescription for estradiol, or estrogen, was ready.
	In a panic, she searched the teenager's room, confronting, and they put it her.
	It's a him. Girls don't need to get estrogen.
	I mean, typically, there might be some defect or something.
	But, you know, it's a guy.
	But they use her. And it went badly.
	They initially refused to use their daughter's chosen name, Lilia.
	And Mrs. James could barely be in the same room with her when she was wearing a skirt.
	It's a guy. It's a son.
	Then a pastor at the church encouraged them to kick their daughter out of their home.
	She said, she recalled thinking, this must be what we're supposed to do.
	This must be biblical advice.
	And so that's where they leave the thing.
	And you know, they're going to quote a lot of experts and they kind of come back and tell you that they abandoned their faith, which is exactly what they do.
	But in the interim...
	They try to take, besides having psychologists who say, well, this is just totally natural now, and it's something we've never seen before, but it's happening to everybody now, even Bill Mars.
	So why is it that all the kids in California are in the wrong bodies, but not the ones in Iowa or something, right?
	Yeah, we know why.
	But they take a comical stab at theology.
	And let me just say, you know, it's a difficult thing to know what to do with that.
	But the one thing that you don't do is to encourage and accept people in their sin.
	And you have to tell them the truth.
	You don't want to live by lies.
	You want to live by God's Word.
	And so you want to be honest with them.
	You don't want to tell them, it doesn't matter.
	It doesn't really matter what God says.
	That's why this is the tip of the spear in the spiritual war.
	But they had this to say, right?
	They said, well, the theological foundation of Christian opposition to the concept of transgender identities announces itself in the very first chapter of Genesis.
	So God created mankind in his own image.
	In the image of God, he created them.
	Male and female, he created them.
	And they think they've got an out for that.
	You think they do? I mean, you can say the Bible just doesn't apply, and you can say, as this family does, well, God just doesn't have any rule in our life.
	We're not going to follow God anymore.
	We're gonna follow our own whims.
	And so you can reject this, you can take it or leave it, but it doesn't really leave any wiggle room.
	You know, God created two genders.
	Gender, two sexes, two genders, whatever.
	All the rest of these were created by the New York Times and Harvard and all the rest of these people, some psychologists.
	Christian advocates for transgender people point out that here's how they try to spin this.
	God created them male and female.
	Well, the Bible depicts a surprising range of gender diversity without apparent judgment.
	No, it doesn't. But listen to what they say.
	Jacob, a patriarch of the nation of Israel, is described as a smooth young man who stays in the family's tent and is favored by God over his more traditionally masculine brother, the hunter Esau.
	And that is absolutely, it doesn't have anything to do with it at all.
	If you read the story there, you know that what they're talking about, smooth versus Esau, one of them had a lot of hair, and the other one wasn't very hairy.
	And he even uses that to deceive an elderly parent and get a blessing because he puts animal skin on himself, right?
	And it's like, I'm Esau.
	It's like, oh, really? You don't sound like Esau?
	But it's about the hair, how much hair he's got.
	One of them is hairy, the other one's not.
	It doesn't have anything to do with the gender.
	There's nowhere in the story that it's ever implied that Jacob was anything other than a man.
	Nowhere. They made that out of, and then immediately after that, in the same paragraph even, it says, Jesus says in the Gospel of Matthew that some men are born eunuchs.
	I don't recall that at all.
	But that doesn't have anything to do with Jacob, and that's not what he's talking about.
	I don't even recall that passage.
	I didn't bother to try to find that because I don't know.
	I think I've probably read the Gospel of Matthew more than this person at New York Times.
	I could be wrong, but I'm kind of thinking that they made this up.
	No, it's the Marxist universities that created the other genders besides male and female.
	But then this is the saddest part of the story.
	They said it was a fight between loving their child unconditionally or believing and following what their religion was telling them.
	You know, any sin can be forgiven.
	But like I said about Trump, not if you don't think you need forgiveness, you won't be forgiven.
	And why do you call Jesus Lord, Lord, but you don't do what he says?
	And as a matter of fact, if you look at Paul's letter to the Corinthians, he was talking about sexual sin there.
	It was a different kind of sexual sin.
	It was a man who had shacked up with his mother-in-law, and they said, yeah, you know, all of our sins are forgiven.
	We can do whatever we want. He said, no, no, no.
	And he said, that kind of sexual perversion is not even known amongst the Gentiles in this area.
	He says, what are you doing?
	With that. You know, there were a lot more, I guess, you know, Rome was not as debauched as our society is now.
	And he said, no, you send him out.
	And hopefully that will wake him up.
	You know, in the Old Testament it says the wounds of a friend are a blessing, that iron sharpens iron.
	Their whole purpose is Of people in the church that hold each other accountable.
	Accountable to what? Accountable to what God says.
	So these people decided they will, they don't believe, they don't believe that God has the power to change people.
	They don't believe that sin can be forgiven.
	They don't believe that they need to, in love, save their son from hell.
	They just walk away. This is why I say, you know, this is where the church is right now.
	And this whole idea that we don't want to hurt anybody's feelings, that's not loving.
	As I said during the pandemic, people said, if you love your neighbor, you'll go get the vaccine.
	I said, no, loving my neighbor is telling them not to get the vaccine.
	Loving your son is telling him not to wear a dress and fall into these traps that have been laid for them.
	And this is how they end the article.
	The mother says, For so long we were good little soldiers and now we live in the gray.
	Folks, there is no gray.
	There is no middle ground.
	Not with God.
	It's darkness or life.
	It's darkness or light.
	There is no gray area.
	There is no lukewarm Christians.
	You're either hot or cold.
	That is one of the biggest lies from Satan.
	Oh, I'm just somewhere in the middle now.
	I'm living in the gray.
	Really strange. But then one last thing here.
	You know, when we talk about the deception of this stuff, I don't spend a lot of time talking about the sports aspect of the transgender stuff, because quite frankly, I think that's the least of all of this stuff.
	I mean, they're grooming, pedophile-wise, these kids in kindergarten.
	I know the stuff about the showers and things like that, but if somebody gets beaten in a sports thing, that's not fair.
	But that's not the key thing.
	You know, Fox News made that the key thing with Bruce Gender so that they could criticize it without really getting involved in the core issue.
	That's not the core issue.
	It's a secondary, tertiary, or even less of an issue.
	There still is an issue.
	They had a transgender high school runner in Oregon who was booed after winning the girls' state title.
	Everybody knows what's going on now.
	And when I look at these, what this reminds me of is how long and how strong the lies were.
	Anything you can do, we can do better.
	You know, the Virginia Slim cigarettes and everything.
	Girls and women can get lung cancer just like men.
	Get your Virginia Slims and everything.
	But that was always, you know, their whole thing was men were repressive and all the rest of this stuff.
	We were lied to for decades and That there was a parody between the different sexes.
	We had the Billie Jean King and the Bobby Riggs, and he was appropriately named Riggs because that's what he did.
	And it wasn't even a parody anyway.
	He was the guy that was in his 40s who was retired and she was in her prime.
	But before that, he had beaten a tennis player, and I think he rigged this one for the money.
	And then after his tennis match, You had Jimmy Connors, skunk current champion, female champion.
	It's not even close.
	And so people are booing this because it's a form of cheating, and they understand that.
	But again, I look at it, and what I see is how long they ran the lies.
	And eventually people wake up, and eventually they understand what the lies are about.
	So when we come back, we're going to talk about artificial intelligence, because it is a lie.
	Yes, it can do some things, and we'll talk about why it can do some pretty amazing things, and yet still be a lie.
	We'll be right back. You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	On Rumble, Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip.
	He writes, I'm not worried about bird flu.
	I'm worried about the government tyranny.
	Exactly right. I died from monkeypox, but I got over that.
	Misplaced fear is such an evil and corrosive thread.
	It is most destructive and enslaving.
	That's absolutely true.
	I mean, why is it that we see so many times, you know, fear not in the Bible, over and over and over again.
	Fear not. If we understand our position in this world, we don't have to fear that.
	On Rumble, Speedro, thank you for, Speedro626, thank you for the tip.
	I appreciate that. And he writes, monsters run the world.
	That's right. And our task is to not become the monsters that we fight.
	That's the key thing.
	And we're here, you know, we're here to fight.
	We're here to fight these monsters.
	I think the most important thing that we can do is to speak and speak the truth.
	And that's why it's important to take a look at artificial intelligence.
	It is going to be a massive propaganda tool, a massive con game, a massive surveillance game.
	And we need to understand what it is as well as we can.
	And I think I found a good explanation for it.
	That is, I think you'll open up some of this to you.
	But before we get to that futurism, during a huge demo, Google's AI provides idiotic advice about photography that would, of course, destroy film.
	Is this why all their pictures of people Scottish people are black, you know You wind up with just a black piece of film you overexpose it and It's not the first time That it's given bad advice. So again, this is Gemini This is the same one that when they ask it all these questions that made everybody black or Asian in Places where there are no black or Asians historically Google is hell-bent on crowding out search results with AI generated advice
	Right futurism, which is often flawed sometimes with devastating consequences, but don't worry. We'll just call it a hallucination It's not a bug.
	It's not a lie.
	It's a hallucination, right?
	This week, during its splashy I.O. conference, the company made yet another blunder.
	As The Verge reports, the tech company showed off its Gemini AI offering suggestions on what to do when the lever on a manual film camera isn't moving all the way.
	Except that it made some genuinely horrible suggestions.
	Among Gemini's dubious things you can try was a highlighted bullet point to open the back door of the camera to gently remove the jammed film.
	Well, that should work, right? Expose the whole role.
	It's not even the first time that Google has been caught showing its AI giving misleading advice.
	Last year, Google's chatbot, which was called Bard at the time, said that NASA's James Webb Space Telescope took the first picture of an exoplanet or a planet outside of our solar system which is blatantly false.
	But, of course, futurism is not going to talk about all the pictures of the black 17th century Scotsman that came up, or the Asian Scotsman, or whatever.
	It's just, you know, that's the most glaring example, and it's the one that everybody can understand.
	I mean, you know, we talk about the differences between exoplanets or when it was discovered or whatever.
	That's minutia.
	This is blatant stupidity.
	And, you know, one picture was worth a thousand words, but they had thousands of pictures.
	Microsoft has deployed a powerful new AI that is completely disconnected from the Internet.
	Why would they do that?
	Well, because the spy agencies want it that way, right?
	So the spy agencies created the Internet.
	They created social media.
	They know that they want to be off of it.
	They know what they created.
	They know what they created the internet for and they know what they created artificial intelligence for.
	Weapons. Surveillance.
	Disinformation. That's what they're all for.
	So the idea is to provide U.S. intelligence agencies with a way to analyze top secret information without running the risk of leaking any of it because nothing is secure.
	Nothing is secure.
	So... Their subtitle here is for CIA eyes only.
	So, you know, when we look at these people, they don't trust the weapons that they have created to not be used against them.
	OpenAI is mocked for issuing an infringement claim over its logo while it scrapes the entire web to train AI models.
	In other words, everything that OpenAI does is to violate...
	Other people's intellectual property and the copyrights and all the rest of this stuff.
	And yet, on one of these websites, 404 Media Reports, chat GPT creator OpenAI is getting absolutely roasted for allegedly hitting moderators of a chat GPT subreddit with an infringement claim because they put up OpenAI's logo.
	So they got a subreddit That's about ChatGBT, and they put the logo up there, and they said, take that down.
	And it's like, are you kidding me?
	You live by violating intellectual property rights.
	You know, I was talking to my son, who I've mentioned many times, Daniel Suarez's Kill Decision.
	Very interesting book, and it was written maybe 12, 15 years ago or something.
	And he told me, he said, I went back and I was listening to this as I was working again.
	I hadn't listened to it for a number of years.
	This is a really good book. And he said, what was interesting was the pivot point Where things got really dangerous in these weaponized drones and things was when the drones and the AI could look at an image and identify the things that are in there, like we've shown you this last week with the phone, right?
	The phone looking, using the camera that's on your phone and saying, you know, what you're drawing or reading your handwriting or looking at the contents of your room and making judgments about it.
	Oh, it looks to me. Oh, take a look at the room that I've got here.
	Oh, it looks to me like you're doing a video.
	Yeah. What's the video about?
	It's about you. Oh, me?
	It's about me?
	You know, that type of thing. And he said that was the pivot point in Daniel Suarez's book, Kill Decision.
	Where the drones got really dangerous, where they could look and make decisions about what it saw.
	And he said, when you look at this, what Daniel Suarez had in his fictional book 12 or 15 years ago, what he'd put in was not nearly as sophisticated as what they're putting on consumer phones now.
	We're in a tight spot now, as they say on one film.
	The new AI teaches humanity how to be better liars.
	And it will never replace humans.
	This is from Brian Shohavi, Health Impact News.
	A very good article.
	He's got a couple of different sources here.
	People who are very knowledgeable about the underlying technology, which I admit I know nothing about large language models or how they operate.
	And... So he said it's been a year and a half now since the first large language model AI app was introduced to the public in November 2022.
	That was a chat GPT, OpenAI, and of course Microsoft was involved in it as well.
	He said, but after 18 months now, the number one problem for these large language model AI programs remains the fact that they still lie and make stuff up when asked questions too difficult for them to answer.
	And I thought about that, and I thought, just like their creators.
	Whether you're talking about the politicians or DARPA or the CIA or the tech companies, these politicians, these spooks, these technocrats, they just lie, especially if they don't know the answer to something.
	They just lie. But when the AI does it now, they call it hallucination.
	Of course, these other guys do as well.
	You know, they're talking and promoting hallucinogenic drugs and mushrooms and all the rest of this stuff.
	So I guess that's why they came up with the term hallucinate.
	But, you know, the hallucination part of it is one of the reasons why art is what it does the best.
	If you stop and think about it, everybody was saying, well, it's going to.
	It's going to be very, well, artificial intelligence and computers.
	It's going to be very rational, and it's going to be very calculating, all this kind of stuff.
	No, instead, it's kind of like, woo, you know, hallucinating, making stuff up.
	That's why it does such a good job with artwork.
	You know, it takes a little bit of stuff that's factual, and then it throws in some crazy stuff as well, which can be difficult to deal with sometimes.
	You're doing artwork. You've got to do successive iterations of it.
	But he says, you know, it is, even though it's rapidly transforming fields like communication, education, creative expression, other things, yet amidst all of this brilliance lies a hidden vulnerability, hallucination.
	And by the way, it's going to even get worse, as we just talked about how it scrapes information off of the internet and uses it.
	It's all based on copying and Ignoring copyrights and all the rest of this stuff.
	And once it starts consuming its own stuff that it's putting out there all the time, once it starts cannibalizing and feeding on its output, they've already shown that it will start to get really stupid.
	It's like somebody getting Yakov Quartzfeld disease, mad cow disease type of thing.
	And, you know, I think that'll even happen with the artwork as well.
	It'll happen with the music.
	It's creating, you know, you can create generic types of music now, but...
	Maybe in the past you would get from a service or something.
	But I think we're going to start seeing that happen.
	Anyway, these hallucinations might seem harmless at first glance, a sprinkle of fiction in a poem, a mistranslated phrase, but the consequences can be real.
	With misleading information, biased outputs, and even eroded trust in technology.
	And I'm eagerly anticipating the day that...
	I hope it doesn't require some major tragedy for it to happen.
	But, you know, we will get to the point at some point.
	People realize garbage in equals garbage out.
	They'll realize these things are not really thinking.
	And once that Rubicon is crossed, it'll be like people seeing, for years we tried to get people hesitant about vaccines and to understand what the issue was with it until Trump came along with his warp speed stuff, and now vaccine hesitancy and skepticism has skyrocketed.
	A similar thing will happen with AI. Let's just hope that it doesn't create a great deal of harm.
	In the process. A synonym of the word, Brian points out, a synonym of the word artificial is fake, not real.
	And so he says, what we ought to call artificial intelligence is fake intelligence.
	We ought to call it FI. Sci-fi, right?
	Yeah. Science, fake intelligence.
	Sci-fi, I guess. Kyle Wiggers, who writes for TechCrunch, said because models have no real intelligence and are simply predicting words, images, speech, music, and other data according to a private schema, they sometimes get it wrong.
	Very wrong. In a recent piece in the Wall Street Journal, a source recounts an instance where Microsoft's generative AI invented meeting attendees and implied...
	The conference calls were about subjects that weren't actually discussed on the call.
	Well, that's not even the worst example.
	I mean, the worst example is what it's done to people slandering them.
	It was Matt Taibbi, who ChatGPT just made up a whole bunch of stuff about him and said, you know, he lied about this, and it was all really negative, slanderous stuff.
	And it started, you know, and then...
	Kind of continued down that rift and then started making variations on his own lies, obviously making all the stuff up.
	And there was, you know, none of it was true.
	But it was talking about how he'd been caught deceiving people and busted for this and that.
	I mean, it's just, and he's not the only one that, you know, you go in and you ask it, you know, give me some information about so-and-so and can accuse people of crimes and that type of thing.
	Devin Coldaway, also writing for TechCrunch, though, had what I think is the most important part of this, the centerpiece of this.
	And he really does seem to understand what the issue is.
	And he said, and how do we explain all these different moving parts to people over coffee or something when they ask me about this?
	He said, you know, you got everybody, one thing about this, you got everybody from philosophers and linguists and To engineers and hackers, to bartenders and firefighters, they're all now questioning and debating what intelligence really is, and what language truly is, and whether something like ChatGPT possesses intelligence and language.
	He said, that's the great pretender.
	He said, AI doesn't know the answer, and it hasn't even learned how to care.
	He says, all that matters is that these systems do not distinguish between something that is correct and something that looks correct.
	Yeah, and I thought this fits in perfectly in our postmodern world, doesn't it?
	I mean, the cynicism of a pilot saying, what is truth, right?
	Well, everybody says that now in college, if they've been college miseducated, college graduates of today.
	You've got a truth, I've got a truth.
	The only truth that they have is that there is no truth.
	Self-contradictory.
	And so, AI is the perfect reflection of our society, isn't it?
	Of a post-modern society.
	That there isn't any truth.
	Once you understand that the AI considers these things to be more or less interchangeable, in other words, something that is correct versus something that kind of approximates what is correct, He said everything makes a lot more sense.
	He says, I've learned a lot already as some of the smartest people in this space enjoy their moment in the sun while from the mouths of comparative babes Come fresh new perspectives.
	But at the same time, it's a lot to sort through over a beer or a coffee when somebody says, what is all this GPT stuff?
	This is kind of scary how smart it's getting, right?
	So where do you start? He said, do you start with Aristotle?
	Do you start with the Mechanical Turk?
	Do you start with the Perceptron?
	Or do you just go, attention is all you need?
	He said, during one of these chats, I hit on a single approach that I found helps people get why these systems can be both really cool...
	And totally untrustable while subtracting not at all from their usefulness in some domains and the amazing conversations being had around them.
	I thought I'd share that in case you find the perspective useful when talking about this with other curious skeptical people who nevertheless don't want to hear about vectors and matrices.
	So he says he boiled it down to three high-level things to think about.
	Number one, these models are created by having them observe relationships between words and sentences, and so on, in an enormous database of text.
	And then to build their own internal statistical map of how all these millions and millions of words and concepts are associated and correlated.
	No one has said, this is a noun, this is a verb, this is a recipe, this is a rhetorical device.
	But all these things just show up naturally in patterns of usage.
	This is one of the reasons why they talk about a large language model.
	It's one of the reasons why, you know, they're desperate to get more and more data.
	Because the more data they have, the more statistically accurate their approximation of the truth is going to be compared to their competitors who don't have as large a language model.
	Number two, these models are not specifically taught how to answer questions.
	With large language models, the questions are just a series of words like any other.
	So it's just looking at your question.
	It's not answering it.
	It's just looking at your question and kind of regurgitating its statistical correlation to something else that's out there.
	Number three, these models have a fundamental expressive quality of confidence in their responses.
	Here's a simple example, he said.
	Take a cat, and you're going to do cat recognition with artificial intelligence.
	Meaning that it would go from zero, completely unsure that it's not a cat, to 100, meaning it's absolutely sure that it is a cat.
	And you can tell it to say, yes, it is a cat if it's at a confidence level of 85 or 90, whatever produces your preferred response metric.
	So he says, so given about what we know about how the model works, here's a crucial question.
	What is it confident about?
	It doesn't know what a cat or a question is.
	It only has a statistical relationship found between the data nodes in a training set.
	A minor tweak would have the cat detector equally confident that the picture showed a cow or the sky or a still life painting.
	The model can't be confident in its own quote-unquote knowledge because it has no way of actually evaluating the content of the data that it's been trained on.
	The AI is expressing how sure it is that its answer appears to be correct to the user.
	That is why it must be considered to be the world's most comprehensively informed BS-er.
	Bolsheviker, right? Rather than an authority on any subject, it doesn't even know that it's BS-ing you.
	It has been trained to produce a response that statistically resembles a correct answer, and it will say anything to improve that resemblance.
	The AI doesn't know the answer to a question, any question, because it doesn't understand the question.
	It doesn't know what questions are.
	It doesn't know anything.
	It's basically doing pattern matching.
	And see, this is one of the reasons why there's two things that I think are dangerous about AI. Really, really dangerous.
	It will assume the mantle of authoritative commentary and people will believe it when it's not true.
	When it has a bias that is actually put into it by the people who created it.
	That's a tremendous problem right there.
	The second part of the problem is this pattern matching thing.
	This is the core of what it does really well.
	And being able to match patterns and to say, not that this is a cat, but that this is David Knight.
	Whether it sees me walking or sees me from a distance or whatever, but it can identify and match these patterns.
	That's exactly what our surveillance government wants.
	Which again, we ought to just call it ServeGov.
	Because that's what they want you to do.
	They want you to serve them.
	On Rockfin. Thank you very much, Michelle Obama.
	Thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that again. And so he says it's the same reason that AI can produce a Monet-like painting that isn't a Monet.
	All that matters is that it has all the characteristics that cause people to identify a piece of artwork as his.
	So it imitates, right?
	And of course, it is all about lying.
	These large language models don't actually create anything new.
	You see? And that's our disconnect.
	We think they're creating stuff.
	No, they're just rearranging things.
	And it's not about that.
	It's about doing the pattern matching.
	That's why the government loves this so much.
	And it's going to use this so much for geospatial intelligence, for anticipatory intelligence, for mapping you and your political and religious beliefs.
	It's going to combine those things together.
	It's the essence of what they want out of geospatial intelligence.
	Another way to look at it would be to observe that what it is doing in the real world is making humans better liars by not accurately representing the core data.
	And that's Brian saying that.
	He says lying and deceiving people sells.
	While the truth most often does not sell and when the public watches a commercial For Google's latest phone and he's got that included in there as well and and that I'll just describe it instead of showing their commercial You know, he sets the camera up he has to take a delayed picture and he jumps in the air and then what he does is He takes the picture he selects himself jumping in the air
	and he makes it bigger and he makes himself jump higher.
	He's way up in the air.
	That's kind of, that's not too much of a, in other words, you're doing Photoshop-type manipulations right in the phone, right away.
	And then towards the end of the commercial, he has a group of like four guys, and somebody's holding the phone up, and they're doing a selfie of the four of them.
	And one of them is looking off to the side, and another one's got his eyes closed or something like that.
	It's kind of a hodgepodge.
	And then they show, after it does its magic, You've got all of them looking directly at the camera, and they've all got their mouths open like, whoa, you know, like a laugh or a yell or something like that, which none of them had that expression on their face.
	And so what he says is, you know, this is manipulating pictures.
	You know, that's one of the key things when you look at photojournalism.
	They don't want anything that is manipulated.
	You can't Photoshop it. You can't do anything to it.
	You can't adjust the colors or things like that.
	They want it in its raw, true form.
	And so when you manipulate the pictures like that, you may be doing it for fun.
	Maybe you're not really thinking about deceiving anybody, but it is manipulative and it is false.
	It's not really what the camera took.
	And so he says, you know, lying and deceiving people sells.
	He says, when you look at that commercial for that Google phone, He says, probably most people are going to look at that and say, that's great.
	I love that. He says, in reality, what it is, is it's dishonest.
	Now, that's a small example.
	But he said, as I mentioned in a recent article, those who are training these large language models are starting to panic because they're starting to run out of data.
	This brings up another serious flaw, and that is, whether or not it's accurate, it's stealing stuff.
	Like the article I had at the beginning, you know, where OpenAI, everybody knows it's stealing stuff.
	It's like they have a problem with a subreddit that is using their logo because it's about OpenAI.
	They tell them to cease and desist, and they go, are you kidding me?
	Yeah, your whole model is based on theft.
	He says, but the greatest data collection abilities that humans have...
	It is non-physical. It is metaphysical.
	Now, I thought this was kind of interesting, and it's something that I've not really noticed before, but I'll give you the point that Brian Shalhavi makes here.
	I think it is kind of interesting.
	He said, hundreds of years of Darwinian biological evolution theory has taught most Westerners that our brain is the center of our consciousness, whereas for thousands of years, people traditionally believed that the heart is the center of our consciousness.
	And that's the way the Bible talks about it.
	Now, whether or not the heart is actually the physical heart or whatever, that's a different issue.
	Whether that is the heart of the person, the heart could represent your soul, for example.
	Because the brain is just an organ.
	You're not your body.
	You're not any part of your physical body.
	You're not your brain. You're not your heart.
	You are something else.
	You're occupying this body right now.
	So that may be what it is as I look at it, but he makes a different case here.
	He says, there's a lot of stories about people who get heart transplants and then find themselves thinking and remembering things that the person who donated their heart experience before they died, even though the recipient of the new heart never knew the donor.
	And he gives one example of many.
	Claire Sylvia had strange cravings and dreams.
	She was in New England.
	Not only did the heart and lung transplant that the 47-year-old woman received save her life, but it also made her the first person in New England to undergo the process.
	She told a reporter that when she was asked what she wanted to do first after the operation, she said that she was quote dying for a beer right now.
	That was strange to her.
	She'd never enjoyed beer in the slightest before.
	Over the coming days, she also found that she was experiencing cravings for food that she'd never liked or eaten before, such as green peppers, Snickers, chocolate bars, and strangely, McDonald's chicken McNuggets, something which she had never had a desire to eat.
	She also began to experience strange dreams.
	She would see a thin young man she believed was called Tim.
	Specifically, she had the words Tim L. in her mind and her dreams.
	She started searching through local obituaries and found out that Timothy Lamarande was 18 years old when he died in a motorcycle accident and she got his heart.
	He had been on his way home from a local McDonald's restaurant.
	A bag of chicken McNuggets was found in his luggage, in his jacket rather, when doctors removed his clothing in a desperate attempt to save his life.
	Yeah, Twilight Zone stuff.
	That's it for today's show.
	Thanks for joining us. Let me tell you, The David Knight Show, you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	Ha ha ha! And you want to know something else?

▲