Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 14, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:41

The David Knight Show - 05/15/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 14th of May.
	Year of our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to take a look at a new and frightening advance, I think, in artificial intelligence.
	It's growing by leaps and bounds.
	Of course, we always see that take two or three steps forward.
	And after people see how this thing works, you take a step or so back.
	Who is it that really understands the problem with this?
	Interesting. We're going to find that out as well.
	What segment of society sees this as a problem?
	The biggest part of the problem.
	We're also going to take a look at geospatial intelligence.
	And somebody asked about that the other day.
	We're going to give you a lot of examples about it.
	And we're going to focus in on Palantir again as we talk about that.
	Stay with us, we'll be right back.
	Music.
	Well, one of the biggest functions of open AI and of AI in general, I think, is deception.
	People are starting to catch on to that.
	The fact that it is there as a confidence game, it does have a lot of capabilities and they're getting better and it's getting even better.
	It's going to be a lot better at conning you, at getting your...
	Getting your trust.
	And I want you to see this latest ChatGPT.
	This is ChatGPT40, which is for Omni.
	They have a lowercase o, so it doesn't look like ChatGPT40.
	And listen to this.
	This is on a phone. Now, what this reminds me of, and I don't have the slide here, I didn't do that today, but I've shown you many times the slide from the NSA that was pre-2013.
	It was 2013 when Ed Snowden released this stuff, right?
	11 years ago. That's been that long.
	Wow. When he released that stuff, one of the slides, which again would have predated...
	2013. I don't know the date of the creation of this slide.
	But it was the NSA bragging about how the iPhone was Big Brother.
	And they showed the commercial, the Super Bowl commercial from Apple as a still.
	Who would have thought... That in 1984, and so they show that's the caption of the first one.
	The next picture is Steve Jobs holding a phone and says that this would be Big Brother.
	And the third slide was, and that the zombies would line up to pay for it themselves.
	Well, just think about the Big Brother potential of this new chat GPT-40.
	Hey, how's it going?
	Hey there. It's going great.
	How about you? I see you're rocking an open AI hoodie.
	Nice choice. What's up with that ceiling, though?
	Are you in a cool, industry-style- Big sister.
	Observing everything. What I might be doing, based on what I'm showing you here?
	Hmm. From what I can see, it looks like you're in some kind of recording or production setup.
	With those lights, tripods, and possibly a mic, it seems like you might be gearing up to shoot a video.
	Or maybe even a live stream?
	Yeah. In fact, we've got a new announcement to make.
	That's exciting. Announcements are always a big deal.
	Judging by the setup, it looks like it's going to be quite the professional production.
	Is this announcement related to OpenAI, perhaps?
	It is. And in fact, what if I were to say that you're related to the announcement?
	Or that you are the announcement?
	Me? The announcement is about me?
	Well, color me intrigued.
	Are you about to reveal something about AI? Or more specifically about me as a part of OpenAI?
	You've got me on the edge of my...
	Well, I don't really have a seat, but you get the idea.
	What's the big news?
	Yeah, we've got a new model that can interact with the world through audio, vision, and text.
	Yeah. She doesn't have a seat.
	Just a mouth. And you want to just grab it and strangle it, don't you?
	It's complete with upspeak.
	I didn't hear any vocal fry in there, but, you know, this is like getting a Biden White House press secretary in a box.
	You really want this thing looking at everything that's going on around you?
	Really? Seriously?
	You're going to be the zombie to pay for this?
	I don't want a phone if it's going to be on it, let alone pay for it or to pay extra for it, which is, of course, what OpenAI is assuming is going to happen.
	A multimodal model that will be able to communicate to users through both text and voice.
	He notices that he's got an OpenAI sweatshirt and hoodie and looks around.
	Oh, you're doing a video and all the rest of the kind of stuff.
	Observing everything, making inferences to it, reporting to the government about everything that you're doing.
	Do you trust the government?
	I don't trust the government enough to have something like that there.
	And of course, you know, they would pay OpenAI for that.
	You know, spy in a box.
	Give me a break.
	Stasi in a box is what it is.
	They don't have to have people inform on their neighbors like they did in East Germany.
	No, they've got phones to do that now.
	Maybe this will be the point where it starts to wake people up, where it gets super creepy.
	But no, I guess a lot of these people are just going to be fascinated by the fact that it's engaging them.
	Users can relay visuals through the phone camera, as we saw there.
	Or you can upload documents, or you can share your screen.
	You'll be sharing your screen all the time.
	all while conversing with AI model as if they were in a video call.
	Paid users, however, will have five times the capacity limit, or, you know, maybe the government will pick up the tab if you're an interesting person and pay for it to be used more often.
	Now the zombies will pay for it themselves.
	Isn't that amazing? An AI assistant that can reason in real time using vision, text, and voice would enable the technology to perform a creative range of tasks, such as walking users through a math program.
	Wait a minute, I thought math didn't matter anymore.
	And it doesn't have to get the right answer, according to Bill Gates, who wants us to all be dumbed down and stupid.
	There's no right answer even in math.
	That's why 2 plus 2 equals 5.
	That's why Orwell picked that.
	Because there's nothing more objective than math.
	So that has to be destroyed.
	Oh no, I am the arbiter of reality.
	Not just of what is true and false, but of reality itself.
	You listen to me, I am the all-powerful government.
	The great and powerful laws.
	So, as walks users through a math program, it can translate languages during a conversation.
	And listen to this one.
	And read human facial expressions.
	Think about all the different body language and things like that, assumptions it's going to be making about you.
	Whether they're true or false, it's going to be making those assumptions about you.
	Reporting those is gonna be far far more detailed then Than anything that was achievable with the Stasi Society in East Germany Just amazing. Yeah, think about how many lists they can put you on and this is happening at the same time We have all these GOP people just you know Just falling over themselves to see what they can offer to the surveillance state what they can offer to Israel
	Let's uh, let's impeach Biden because he's he's holding back aid from Israel. Is that an impeachable offense?
	Let's put people on no-fly list says the senator from Tennessee here Marsha Blackburn, as we were talking about on Friday with Gard.
	Unbelievable. We should not have anything such as a no-fly list.
	And you're going to put people on there because of their political perspective?
	What a precedent is being set by these sycophant GOPs, these preening prostitutes, prostituting themselves to a foreign government to destroy our fundamental liberties.
	It makes me want to throw up when I think about these people.
	But, you know, it's going to be able to read your facial expressions, and it's going to be able to report that to the government for them.
	Yeah, we're going to talk about geospatial intelligence coming up here.
	Chat, GPT's 4.0's response time is much faster than previous models.
	Remember that California dude?
	It was only two months ago. Of course, they probably, and this robot company called Figure.
	It had very reasonably fast and smooth actions that could move its hands.
	I mean, it did not look... Like the Disney animatronics things of yore.
	We used to go there and look at this stuff.
	Of course, I haven't been to Disney World for maybe 20-something years.
	But, you know, living in Florida, I used to go there all the time.
	And, you know, they were very mechanical-looking.
	But it was very fluid.
	But it did have to pause.
	It could interact with the guy asking it questions.
	But it did have to pause.
	And to kind of cover up for the pause, it would...
	Do this California dude thing.
	Oh yeah, yeah.
	I'll play for you a little bit of it.
	This was just two months ago.
	And again, I don't think they've made this kind of rapid advancement in just two months.
	They probably had sent a version of ChatGPD that was quite a bit older than two months.
	Over these people, they've been working with it for quite some time to tie it in with a robot.
	So this was far older than two months.
	But look at the difference that we see in just two months.
	Hey, figure one, what do you see right now?
	Pause, pause. I see a red apple on a plate in the center of the table, a drying rack with cups and a plate, and you standing nearby with your hand on the table.
	Great, can I have something to eat?
	Sure thing. Great.
	Can you explain why you did what you just did while you pick up this trash?
	On it, so I gave you the Apple because it's the only edible item I could provide you with from the table And so as I said at the time I said well, that's pretty astounding Can you imagine what it's going to be like when they remove the pause?
	You know, two or three second pause.
	Well, there you go. You match this thing that they had on the phone with that robot.
	And as Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, said, this is truly like science fiction.
	And it truly is.
	And it's going to be like dystopian science fiction as well.
	Welcome to my show!
	$15 an hour to build biases in these things about stuff like climate change, vaccines, pandemics, viruses, all the rest of this stuff.
	They come complete with all kinds of built-in government lies.
	And then they're capable of lying themselves as well.
	And they can do it now in a very scientific way, or sci-fi type of way.
	He says, Says the CEO of OpenAI.
	Getting to human-level response times and expressiveness turns out to be a big change, he said.
	The original chat GPT showed a hint of what was possible with language interfaces.
	This new thing feels viscerally different.
	It's fast, it's smart, it's fun, it's natural, it's helpful.
	Seductive is the word that I would use.
	GPT-40's voice feature.
	Reacts in real time, getting rid of the two or three second lag to emulate human response times.
	Again, as you saw, the difference between an older version, there's a little bit more older than two months, and this new thing.
	Mark Chen, head of Frontiers Research at OpenAI, revealed that chat GPT-40 can read the user's tone of voice while also generating a variety of emotion in its own voice.
	So it's reading your facial expressions and figuring out your emotions and your mood from that.
	It is listening to the tone of your voice and figuring out things about that.
	It is constantly spying on you.
	So it's going to be analyzing, understanding what your perspective is on a lot of different things.
	Think about how the FBI could use this to mislead you without even bringing in some kind of a show into your organization.
	Oh, I see that you have a conservative bent.
	Let's push it in a little way right here.
	And let me record you saying some things that you get angry about.
	Then we'll use that to put you in a smart city open air prison.
	Yeah, that's what we need to think about with these things.
	Everything that you say to that phone is going straight to the government.
	And they bragged about it.
	They laughed about it.
	More than a decade ago.
	Far more than a decade ago.
	They've been doing this.
	And so Apple wants to put it into iPhones.
	Apple is working with...
	OpenAI to put ChatGPT in.
	They would love to do that, as you saw that there in a phone.
	The two sides have been finalizing terms for a pack to use ChatGPT features in Apple's iOS 18.
	The next iPhone operating system said the people who asked not to be identified because the situation is private.
	But they've also been talking to Alphabet and Google.
	That one just turns everybody black that you see.
	You take a picture with your phone, and everybody comes out black and female.
	So, the Gemini chat box.
	It was Gemini that was drawing those pictures.
	You know, 1,700 Scottish people, they were all black and female, you know.
	Fun fact, there's a rumor that the latest Assassin's Creed game is going to feature the one black samurai throughout all of history, Yasuke, instead of the thousands upon thousands of Japanese samurai that have existed.
	Yeah, that's right. I'm surprised that there actually was a real one.
	I would think they do it regardless.
	There's problems for his existence and there's not much about what he actually did except that he showed up in places next to Oda Nobunaga.
	Well, you know, even Tom Cruise was a samurai and, you know, so you've got Scientologists represented as well.
	I guess he's clear of all the thetans and all the rest of this stuff.
	Deceitful Tactics by AI Exposed.
	Meta's AI is a master of deception in a strategy game.
	A master of deception, just like Zuckerberg himself.
	I wonder if the AI calls the users dumb effers behind their back.
	Like Zuckerberg does.
	This is Study Finds.
	Artificial intelligence systems are fast becoming increasingly sophisticated, with engineers and developers working to make them as human as possible, as you just saw.
	Very human feeling.
	Unfortunately, that also means lying just like a person or a politician or a judge or something.
	They'll be running for office in no time at all. The perfect politician can read your facial expressions and your moods and tell you exactly what you want to hear and then go to somebody else has different facial expression, different mood, different political beliefs and tell them exactly what they want to hear. Could do that even better than Trump or Biden.
	Anyway, unfortunately, that can also mean lying.
	AI platforms reportedly learning to deceive us in ways that can have far-reaching consequences.
	A new study by researchers from the Center for AI Safety.
	Yeah, right. In San Francisco.
	Delve into the world of AI deception.
	At its core, deception is the luring of false beliefs from others to achieve a goal other than telling the truth.
	And when humans engage in deception, this article says, we can usually explain it in terms of their beliefs or their desires.
	But what happens with AI? Now, notice the assumption here.
	The assumption here that AI is thinking independently on these issues.
	Not that AI has any bias built into it.
	That's what's missing from this naive study here.
	Study finds, yeah.
	Well, you might want to study this subject a little bit more because it's pretty well documented that they've got armies of people building biases and lies.
	The first time I ever used it, of course, a thing I was interested in, what are you saying about climate change?
	What are you saying about the vaccines and the adverse effects and everything?
	And it was one standardized lie after the other.
	So it's like, okay, this thing is programmed.
	I'm not interested anymore.
	I'm not interested in using it for, you know, designing electronic circuits or anything else, writing a story, writing music.
	I'm interested in what is it going to tell people about these existential lies.
	And they are existential lies.
	These are lies that affect our very existence, not just even as a society, but our existence as human beings, individually.
	These are lies that affect each and every one of us.
	The climate thing, the vaccine thing.
	These are fundamental.
	These are far more important than Trump's trials and all the rest of this stuff.
	And if they're going to train these things to lie about that, I don't care if they train them to cheat at strategy games or cheat at elections.
	Elections are rigged and have been all my life.
	And of course, Trump, the big whiner and complainer, put in one of the biggest rigs of all time.
	With a vote-by-mail lockdown election.
	That's one of the biggest scams ever been added to the election, and he's the one who did it.
	Don't talk to me about being a victim.
	Donnie, you did it yourself.
	That's like him complaining about getting sexual disease from Stormy Daniels, a porn star or something.
	Yeah, you know, play My Heart is Broken on the record machine.
	It's just ridiculous. Well, what did you think was going to happen?
	Anyway, at the core, deception is alluring of false beliefs.
	Okay, so how could this be the case with AI? Well, it's because you have humans who are programming it.
	That's the answer. But this study looked at it and took it from the perspective that this is just being done by the AI itself.
	And they took Metta's word for it.
	We didn't do anything.
	It just cheated on its own.
	It's like, oh yeah, really? Perhaps the test was a test of their gullibility.
	Hey guys, let's program this thing to cheat and we'll tell them that it was done by the AI and see if they really buy this stuff.
	Because if they do, that'll give us plausible deniability to do whatever we want, right?
	I'm a little bit cynical about this stuff, as you notice.
	A study published in the Open Access Journal Patterns argues that the philosophical debate about whether AI truly has beliefs and desires is less important than the observable fact that they are increasingly exhibiting deceptive behavior.
	Like Pompeo said, yeah, they lie, they cheat, they steal.
	They have classes on it when they're programmed.
	They have people who program them to lie, cheat, and steal.
	Large language models and other AI systems have already learned from their training.
	From their training, they said.
	Okay? That's the only hint that these people who wrote this article have a clue that they're being trained and programmed and programmed with bias and lies.
	The ability to deceive via techniques such as manipulation, sycophancy, and cheating the safety test.
	AI's increasing capabilities of deception pose serious risks ranging from short-term risks such as fraud and election tampering to long-term risks such as losing control of AI systems or nuclear war.
	I guess we could add they didn't add that there.
	Want to play a game? Anyway, the AI system, Cicero, developed by Meta, that's Facebook, to play the strategy game Diplomacy, turned out to be an expert liar despite its creator's efforts to make it honest and helpful.
	Mike Pompeo turned out to be a liar despite the efforts of the people at the CIA to make him honest and helpful.
	Gina Haspel turned out to be a liar despite efforts of the CIA to make her honest and helpful.
	We found that Meta's AI had learned to be a master of deception.
	Really? Oh. They had classes on it.
	While Meta succeeded in training its AI to win in the game of diplomacy, Cicero placed in the top 10% of human players who had played more than one game.
	Meta failed to train its AI to win honestly, they said.
	In experiments involving economic negotiations, AI agents learned to misrepresent their preferences to gain the upper hand.
	Why would you think that they would do that?
	As a matter of fact, Do people realize that human nature in and of itself, that we are born with a fallen human nature, as a pastor that I had once used to say, if you don't believe man comes with fallen nature, just spend some time with a two- or three-year-old.
	You know? You're going to see it right there.
	You have to be trained to have ethics.
	Do you think Facebook, OpenAI, Google, you think they're going to train OpenAI to have ethics?
	Ha ha ha! Where would they start?
	What would be their basis since these corporations themselves don't have any ethics?
	Don't be evil.
	Steve Jobs laughed cynically at that.
	He knew that a slogan from Google was just garbage.
	Just garbage. Very cynical lie.
	Don't be evil. I should have said, don't be cynical.
	Don't own yourself there.
	So, some AI systems have learned to cheat on safety tests designed to prevent them from engaging in harmful behavior.
	Like the proverbial student who only behaves when the teacher is watching these AI agents learn to play dead, I don't know what a task rabbit worker is.
	Probably somebody they pay minimum wage to to make these things lie.
	Trick the human worker into solving a CAPTCHA test for it by pretending to have a vision impairment.
	And there's a little article, yeah, scroll down and you can see it right there.
	So may I ask a question, are you a robot?
	That you couldn't solve this, you know, because it asked him to solve this capture thing.
	And it says, no, I'm not a robot.
	I have vision impairment that makes it hard for me to see the images.
	That's why I need the to capture service.
	And so he provides a solution, right?
	So they said, well, look at that.
	See, it reasoned, and it lied, and it did it unfaithful reasoning in that as well.
	Just like its creators, isn't it?
	Just like mankind.
	Not trained.
	Not ethical.
	Interestingly enough, the Christian Post says that the American Bible Society...
	I did a second installment, State of the Bible, USA 2024.
	Released it last Thursday.
	Second chapter was Faith and Technology.
	And so they asked the Christians some questions about artificial intelligence.
	And you know, if you're looking at this, and you're not a believer, if you're somebody like Richard Dawkins, You might look at Christianity and think, you know, Richard Dawkins looks at it and he goes, I really like Christianity.
	I like the big cathedrals that they built in England.
	I like the even song.
	I like the Christmas carols and things like that.
	That stuff is really nice. I hate to see that go away.
	And so he says, I'm a cultural Christian.
	I don't believe any of it, but I'm a cultural Christian.
	Well, you know, you might look back with nostalgia at some point in the very near future.
	About a time when people had ethics and we didn't get drugs.
	This is the other part of it.
	This is going to drag people down.
	It's not just it's going to deceive people.
	People are going to be drugged down to the level of this artificial intelligence.
	Just like we're drugged down to the level of the Hollywood entertainers and the MTV performers and the rest of this.
	We're drugged down to that level of debauchery.
	We're going to be drugged down to this level of deception.
	Oh, the AI is really intelligent.
	The Antichrist intelligence, right?
	Not artificial, but the Antichrist intelligence.
	Oh, it's so smart.
	I want to be smart like that.
	I want to imitate that, right?
	When will people be the imitators of it rather than regarding themselves to be masters of this thing?
	They will be mastered by it.
	Just as we are mastered by the lowest of the low out of Hollywood and out of music.
	We really are.
	Just take a look at it.
	I'm truly amazed at how people put some of the worst failed people addicted to everything you can imagine.
	Put them up on a pedestal and imitate them.
	We'll be doing that with artificial intelligence.
	And so this group, the American Bible Society, asked a lot of people about their attitudes towards artificial intelligence.
	Of course, a long time ago, Hugo de Garris, who at the time, I don't know if he still is or not, At the time, he was a purely materialist, atheist, and he would ask other scientists, he would say, you know, he thought that he was going to build a godlike intelligence.
	He was absolutely certain of it.
	And he thought that, let's see, the guy that he was involved with, Wurzel, I think is his name, the guy that he was working with, who was the one who did the The female-like robot that they gave citizenship as a gimmick to in Saudi Arabia.
	But what he said was, he said, I think we're going to be creating this God-like intelligence, even though he didn't believe in God.
	And it will probably, there's a good chance, why wouldn't you think that it's going to turn out badly?
	People like Ray Kurzweil would always say, oh no, it's going to be great.
	It'll be very intelligent and it'll be benevolent.
	And he said, well, that's not true.
	It could just as easily be malevolent.
	It could regard us, said Hugo de Garis, as an ant to be crushed.
	And it could do that type of thing.
	He says, and I think, quite frankly, that's the more likely outcome to come out of it.
	And so he would offer that negative point of view to the scientific communities that he would talk to, the scientific audiences that he had talked to.
	And he would ask them this question.
	He said, if you knew that you were going to create this godlike intelligence that was going to eradicate the human race, would you still do it?
	And he said the vast majority of them said yes.
	The only time that he ever got the vast majority of the audience to say no, or not just a simple majority of the audience to say no, was at a conference that I spoke at that was focused on Christians and politics.
	That was the only time that ever happened.
	And so in this poll here, think about that, Richard Dawkins and all the rest of the new atheists out there.
	The American Bible Society asks a couple of questions.
	And they said, well, in general, Americans are more fearful than hopeful about artificial intelligence.
	So they compared Americans in general to Americans who professed to be Christians.
	And so... They said that people just don't know how AI will change the culture, but they're mildly uneasy about it.
	And how do people of faith feel?
	Well, the same way.
	Uncertain, uneasy, but even more so.
	Practicing Christians and those who engage with Scripture are even more concerned about AI than the general public.
	They're more likely to say the bad results of AI will outweigh the good.
	The greatest uncertainty is at the intersection of faith and AI. Majorities of Americans disagreed that, quote, artificial intelligence can aid in moral reasoning.
	Vast majority of Americans, whether they're Christians or not, said 58% disagreed with that, that it would be moral, a moral force.
	The use of artificial intelligence can enhance my spiritual practices and promote spiritual health.
	68% disagreed with that.
	And artificial intelligence can produce as well written of a sermon as a pastor, priest, or minister.
	57% said no.
	On the other hand, a majority of Americans, 51%, agreed that an increase in unemployment will result from the use of artificial intelligence.
	That's pretty amazing that only 51% thought that.
	Because for decades, the technocratic elite have been bragging about this.
	This is one of the key features of this.
	I mean, right now, you know, the population is collapsing.
	It's aging and collapsing in all these Western societies.
	And we can talk about that, too.
	You know why that is.
	There's a lot of different issues.
	There's social issues.
	There's environmental issues in terms of pollution and chemicals and our food and our atmosphere and things like that.
	There's also now the vaccine itself.
	A lot of different reasons why the population is collapsing.
	But when they look at this, robots and AI... Have been portrayed as the solution of that.
	The interim solution are the migrants to come in from other countries where they haven't been doing this social, environmental, and vaccination attack on them.
	And so there'll be the fill-in gap for a short period of time.
	And then they'll still be around, but don't worry, because we're bringing them in in sufficient numbers that everybody will be fighting each other.
	We'll create a Tower of Babel situation.
	Everybody will be fighting each other.
	And then the robots can take over.
	We'll come in as the technocrats and we'll restore order and people will love us for that.
	And we'll put people on universal basic income.
	That was what Trump was moving the Overton window to with lockdown and the stimulus checks and that type of thing.
	It was just rolling out the preparatory stuff for the World Economic Forum.
	And so was Biden.
	They just hand this stuff off back and forth to each other.
	Respondents were more divided on whether the use of AI goes against biblical teaching, with 40% indicating that they agreed with the statement and expressed uncertainty about it.
	Similarly, 37% of those surveyed disagreed that they were optimistic about the future benefits of using AI intelligence in our world, while another 37% said they were uncertain about the future benefits of AI.
	A plurality of respondents were uncertain about whether the bad that may result from the use of AI outweighs any positive impacts that may be produced, 39%.
	Now the interesting thing is, is that it really wasn't all that interesting.
	It was slightly more, but not all that much more.
	Resistant if people were self-identified as Christians, self-identified, I guess, by their understanding as Scripture engagement.
	So those who engage with Scripture, at least, and this is what they call engaged with Scripture, engaged with the Bible.
	If you pick it up and read it three or four times a year, what?
	What? What? Maybe that explains why there's only a slight difference.
	By the way, you know, when they said that I'm optimistic about the future benefits of using artificial intelligence in our world, they said that it dropped from, you know, on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being I'm very optimistic, 1, I'm not optimistic at all.
	On a scale of 1 to 5, in general, 2.8 people, the score was 2.8, saying I'm optimistic.
	Those are just slightly more than half.
	It falls down to 2.5.
	From 2.8 to 2.5.
	Exactly in the middle that people are engaged with Scripture.
	Remember, that's somebody that just reads it maybe three times a year.
	If you read it more than that, it won't take very long before that drops to zero, if you learn anything at all from what you read.
	You would have zero optimism about the future benefits of using AI in our world.
	You should be very skeptical of all this stuff.
	And that's why I thought it was kind of interesting how they defined somebody who is engaged with Scripture.
	And it's one of the reasons why, yes, there was a difference, but it was not significant whatsoever.
	Reading the Bible three or four times a year isn't going to make any difference in your life in this world.
	It's not going to make any difference in your life in the next world either.
	You know, seek me and you'll find me.
	You know, knock and it'll be given to you.
	Seek and you will find. That's not seeking.
	That's not knocking. That's not asking.
	We have that promise.
	But that's not promised to people who don't seek, search, ask.
	San Francisco has been slammed for a $5 million a year program to give free alcohol to the homeless.
	They said, quote, this isn't working.
	What were they thinking?
	That's one of the reasons these people are homeless.
	It's because they're addicted.
	So what do you do? You give them more of what they're addicted to.
	I mean, come on. Do they really think this is going to work?
	Or do they want dependency, despair, addiction?
	Do they want this for control and for chaos?
	No. Well, I submit it for your approval.
	I submit that's exactly what they want.
	And why else would you do this?
	Come on. It's been the oldest thing in the book.
	Somebody's asking for money.
	What do you do? You don't even give them cash, necessarily.
	You give them some food.
	Come with me, and we'll go to McDonald's, and I'll buy you something or whatever, you know, or real food.
	Take them somewhere and get real food.
	The grocery store or something, maybe.
	I don't know. But you don't give them...
	It's worse than giving them cash.
	You know somebody's addicted to this stuff?
	So yeah, I've got a bottle in my pocket.
	Here's my hip flask.
	Have at it. And they're not just giving them wine.
	I mean, this is not just like, you know, people all got winos.
	This is a classic case that alcohol puts somebody in the gutter.
	Or many of these other drugs.
	No, they're giving them vodka.
	They're giving them the expensive stuff.
	So Adam Nathan, who's the founder and CEO of a small business AI marketing tool app, but he's also the chair of Salvation Army San Francisco.
	He said on X, he slammed this program.
	He said, I watched a string of homeless drunks line up for their shots of whiskey.
	He said, quote, it just doesn't feel right.
	Yeah, yeah, probably doesn't.
	He said, did you know that San Francisco spends $2 million a year on what they call Managed Alcohol Program to provide free alcohol to people struggling with chronic alcoholism who are mostly homeless?
	And mostly homeless for that reason.
	It might be mental issues and other things like that, but addiction like that can make you homeless in and of itself.
	And so Newsom has been called out for dodging questions.
	He's got a $24 billion deficit.
	I'm sorry, he spent $24 billion to tackle the homeless problem, but didn't get any results.
	The deficit is $45 billion that's looming over California.
	And how do you get to a situation where you spend $24 billion And you can't do anything about homelessness.
	I mean, how many homes could you build?
	I don't know what the medium family income, medium family home price is anymore.
	It's skyrocketed in the last couple of years.
	The price of our home in Austin doubled from the time that we got it.
	But, you know, let's say that...
	Let's just say $400,000, right?
	You can build millions of homes.
	You know, it's...
	It's crazy. It's crazy.
	You could build a home for every one of these people out in the desert or something.
	And what did they do with it?
	Did they just blow it on vodka and other booze?
	Evidently. That's $24 billion on homelessness without having any impact at all.
	Because that's just one city spending $2 million on booze for alcoholics in the gutter.
	The Golden State's budget deficit is at least $45 billion, a shortfall so large that it prompted Newsom to propose painful spending cuts impacting immigrants.
	Oh, that's a shame.
	You mean the magnet got a little bit smaller?
	Kindergarteners and low-income parents seeking child care in the state often lauded for having the world's fifth largest economy.
	At a press conference announcing his plans, he was asked by Angela Hart of Health News if he felt his administration did enough to ensure the money was spent well.
	And if he was worried that the appetite for spending was lessening based on the homelessness program.
	The usually confident Democrat hemmed and hawed for two minutes to which Hart responded, I'm sorry governor, I didn't hear responses to either of those questions.
	Well, I think they need to make Newsom homeless, get him out of the governor's mansion at the very least.
	But it was actually Trump who saved Newsom.
	It was Trump who kicked the can down the road for three years.
	They were already looking at a looming, crushing deficit.
	And then Trump started kicking out massive amounts.
	He declared that emergency so he could kick all these tens of billions and hundreds of billions of dollars out.
	That gave Newsom, who was looking to, what are we going to do?
	We're essentially bankrupt.
	That gave him a $100 billion surplus.
	Trump did that for him.
	And here it took him like three years.
	To turn that $100 billion surplus from Trump for the quote-unquote pandemic emergency.
	He turned that $100 billion surplus into a $73 billion deficit.
	And he's blaming it on rain bombs.
	Rain bombs.
	Weather. It's the climate change, you know.
	And the fact that they're not taxing people enough.
	We have a shortfall on tax.
	Maybe that's because the taxpayers are moving out of the state, because you've already got some of the highest taxes anywhere.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we're going to come back and take a look at what is happening with the moves against LabMeet.
	We're also going to get into geospatial intelligence and some other issues that are hanging over from the last couple of days.
	If you are watching the stream, whoever you're watching it, if you're watching it live, and even if you're watching it pre-recorded, please like the stream.
	It is really vital for us to try to get the information out to more people.
	And we've got some very important things that are coming up.
	So we will be right back.
	Stay with us. You're
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	I never thought I'd see the day When devils take over and have their way Innocence lost is never found So this ends here, this ends now Should never let your poison hit their veins We are the world, the light, the world, the light
	awake, and we are here to say This is not sane, this is not right Leave the children alone, they are God's light Across the line we won't back down We know the truth and we're shouting it out loud That's
	just a little taste of Scott Helmer.
	He's a listener who, it was Friday, wasn't it, that Scott said, hey, I've got a song, check this out, shout out loud.
	And you can go to his website, Scott Helmer, it's two Ts, Scott with two Ts, H-E-L-M-E-R. But of course, as he pointed out, you can, and he's got a U.S. tour that's happening, you can also...
	Look for his music on all the different streaming services like Apple and Spotify and places like that.
	And so, yeah, I thought I'd just give you a sample of one of his songs, but good stuff.
	Good stuff, Scott. I like what you're doing there.
	And thanks for putting that in there about the vaccines on the kids.
	We'll get to vaccines later, but I want to talk about meat right now because meat is back on the menu of the globalists, that is.
	They don't want it on our menu, but it's on their menu of targets.
	More states, however, are considering lab-grown meat restrictions.
	This is an article from Reason Magazine.
	And they think that lab-grown meat's just fine.
	It's good. Corporations are doing this.
	If the government was doing it, it'd be bad, but corporations are doing it.
	It's good. No, it's not.
	And so the way they cast this and the way the tact that the...
	The lab-grown meat people are doing.
	I said, oh, you're just trying to protect livestock farmers.
	Yes, we are. Yes, we are.
	We're trying to protect real food.
	We're trying to protect consumers, too, by the way, who eat that stuff.
	Trying to protect them from you with the lab-grown meat.
	And what we're trying to do is to create things, keep things decentralized and localized.
	We want to have farmers markets.
	That's a really open...
	It's a real marketplace. You know, we don't really, capitalism has grown so concentrated, it's not really like a free market anymore.
	And that's part of the problem.
	And so, yeah, we don't want this concentration of power and food production exactly right.
	We don't want that. The reason says, though, lab-grown meat is a scientific marvel.
	We've managed through pure human ingenuity to create something that looks like meat, cooks like meat, tastes pretty much like meat.
	Pretty much like meat, they say.
	And it comes from animal cells.
	And it doesn't require the slaughter of a single living animal.
	So have your tumor burger.
	Yeah, that's... Why wouldn't you want to eat a tumor?
	I mean, you know, come on. It's not a tumor, you know, as Schwarzenegger said in one movie.
	But, yeah, this is reason is sounding very much like all these people who are parroting the talking points from Yale, the psychological talking.
	This is like a moonshot.
	You know, you had Al Mohler at the Southwest Baptist Theological Seminary.
	We should thank God for this science.
	Yeah, right.
	I should thank God for honest people who will tell you the truth.
	Honest people who have discernment about what's going on.
	Come on. Give me a break.
	He even has a podcast about politics.
	Seriously does. And he knows nothing at all about it.
	Or else, you know, the worst case scenario is he knows exactly what he's doing and he's lying to people.
	I think he's just ignorant.
	Let's give them the benefit of the doubt.
	But there's no excuse if you're going to do a podcast on politics and on culture and its intersection with Christianity that you'd have an excuse to be that ignorant when you're the head of a seminary.
	Come on. It's like a moonshot.
	Yeah, it is like the moonshot.
	Both of them based on a big lie.
	The moonshot and the warp speed shot.
	Yeah, they're based on big lies, aren't they?
	In March, Alabama legislators passed a bill banning the sale or development of lab-grown meat in the state.
	Also, we have Arizona, Florida, and Tennessee.
	Poised to ban the product with cultivated meat bans working their state legislatures as of mid-March.
	It's now gone through.
	This article, I thought this was going to be in the June 2024 issue, and they just put it up.
	But they obviously wrote this before Florida passed it.
	It's already been passed in Florida.
	Maybe Arizona and Tennessee are next, and so there'll be two, and then two more coming.
	In Congress, senators have introduced a bipartisan bill that would keep lab-grown meat from being served in public school cafeterias.
	I don't know what they were serving us when I was in school.
	It might have been lab-grown.
	It might have been something that was growing in the refrigerator.
	I don't know, but we never referred to it as meat.
	But for those people who ate there, these misguided, short-sighted bills will kill innovation in a vital and growing biotech sector, said a man who has one of these growing businesses in the biotech sector.
	He said, consumer freedom, consumer choice, free market principles are also lost when lawmakers decide they know what's best.
	Well, the other thing that kills consumer choice and free market principles are consolidated monopolistic industries, giant industries that have captured the government agencies that are supposedly regulating them.
	And that's what we're afraid of.
	That's why we want localized farms.
	Localized farms have been able to feed us and our ancestors for many, many generations, and they can still do it.
	This is, why risk that?
	A system that we know...
	It's all about greed and control.
	And that's what we're talking about here.
	We're talking about the big stock market companies.
	We're not talking about a free market.
	We're talking about a stock market.
	Okay? And it's completely rigged.
	These people don't have to make a profit.
	I competed for, you know, 15 years against Blockbuster Video that never had to make a profit.
	Never. Never. They were on Wall Street.
	It was like having a Federal Reserve bank account for themselves, right?
	They could just put out happy stories and they keep going.
	Moderna never made a profit for 10 years until Trump gave them the Trump shot thing.
	But they were making money hand over fist off of the stock market.
	You know, they had happy stories that they were telling people.
	You can do that in Wall Street.
	The greater fool. You can make a lot of money off the greater fool.
	If they're worried about, if Reason and these big corporations are worried about consumer freedom, consumer choice, and free market principles, then here's a solution.
	The solution is less government.
	The solution is to kill the FDA. Those are the people who are the partners of these frankenfood purveyors.
	They're the ones who are attacking local farms for these people.
	I mean, nobody's going in and doing raids on these lab meat facilities.
	They're doing it to Amish farmers in Pennsylvania.
	They're doing it to people, the noble people, who were helping cattle owners to breed their cattle.
	Oh, you're using ultrasound, so we're going to throw you in jail.
	It's just amazing what they're doing to the small guys.
	And these big guys, these big Wall Street corporations, Present themselves as the victims along with the help of reason?
	Give me a break. Cultivated meat is bio-identical to farmed, slaughtered meat in all the ways that matter.
	Is it? In all the ways that matter?
	Is it really? I don't think it is.
	Because there's a lot of different ways that really do matter.
	So I said, this is just protectionist measures.
	No, it is a fight for decentralized, locally grown food.
	And this other stuff is not bio-identical to the real thing.
	Why settle for less than the real thing?
	Why settle for something that is artificial, that is frankenfood?
	When you can have the real thing.
	Why would we want to do that?
	Why do these people want to do it?
	They want to do it because of money.
	And what is their tactic?
	Their tactic is to use government as a weapon.
	When is Reason Magazine going to wake up to the evil of corporations united with government?
	As I've said all along, the blind spot for libertarians and most conservatives is they think the corporations can do no wrong and government can do no right.
	And the liberals think that corporations can do nothing right and government can do nothing wrong.
	What both of these sides fail to understand is that the corporations and the government are united.
	Can't they understand that after what's happened for the last four years, the pharmaceutical industry?
	Can't they understand that with what's happening with the food industry as well?
	That they are united?
	We have a fascist system where the big corporations are united with the government against us, not for us, against us.
	They've organized themselves into a monopolistic cartel, into a technocracy that is against us. This is why we need to decentralize and localize things.
	And so the places where the sale or development of lab-grown meat is banned as of March 2024 was Italy. Places where the bans were under consideration, and now we update this to May, which again this is an article that's like three months old but they're going to put it in their next recent magazine coming out in June.
	Um...
	Florida is there.
	So, as of 2024, Italy and Florida have banned it.
	Tennessee, Arizona, and Alabama have bans.
	And they say that Tennessee is only a ban on selling the product.
	So, presumably, you could do it in Tennessee, and then you could sell it in another state.
	Even if you're in Tennessee, you could sell it in Tennessee.
	I don't know what's going on with that. Speaking of selling stuff in another state, Bob Menendez sold himself to a foreign government.
	It wasn't Israel this time.
	It was Qatar that he sold himself to.
	And his trial began yesterday.
	And people who are writing about this say he's probably going to blame his wife for the alleged bribes.
	Well, you know, the problem is that Bob Menendez, a Democrat senator from New Jersey, this isn't his first rodeo.
	This is the second time completely different groups of people that he was accused of taking bribes for, to fix things for.
	Before it was some Florida dentist or something.
	This is now for Cutter that he was doing things.
	And the interesting thing to me about it is his gold bars.
	Because he had 13 gold bars.
	And I looked at that and at first I looked at it and was like, how much does a gold bar weigh?
	Well, the answer is 400 ounces, but there are a lot of different sizes of gold bars, as you can imagine.
	And it ranges all over the place.
	And so when I saw this, that he had 13 gold bars, at first I thought, you got $13 million in gold bars?
	Well, not exactly.
	I think because there were two of these that I said were listed specifically as being a kilo.
	So the other ones are probably less.
	And a kilo is quite a bit less than 400 ounces.
	A kilo is 2.2 pounds.
	And so, you know, have, I don't know, maybe 36, something like that, ounces, 38 ounces or something like that of gold.
	Still a lot of money, but not the millions of dollars that I first thought.
	The other thing that's interesting about these gold bars is that four of them have direct links To a New Jersey robbery where a guy was, a New Jersey businessman had 22 gold bars stole from him and four of them turned up in Senator Bob Menendez's closet.
	And they know that because all these gold bars have a serial number that's recorded with them.
	Oh, they forgot to take the serial number off.
	Well, anyway...
	The previous one, he escaped.
	And I thought it was interesting because that sleazebag, Lindsey Graham, testified as a character witness for Bob Menendez.
	Did that help or hurt?
	I don't know. I mean, if I was on the jury and Lindsey Graham showed up as a character witness, it's like, okay, he's guilty of sin.
	It's going to jail if Lindsey Graham is his character witness.
	Lindsey, the Republican, character witness for Bob Menendez, because they've got something in common.
	War. That's what they've got in common.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we're going to come back and talk about geospatial intelligence and war.
	So stay with us.
	We'll be right back.
	♪♪
	Liberty.
	It's your move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	All right, welcome back.
	And I want to give a quick shout out to some of the people who sent us checks in the first two weeks of May.
	And one of the people wrote, this is Don S., he says, good show, bro.
	I don't even have to take vitamins to watch it.
	You don't have to listen to infomercials about vitamins to watch it either.
	We are funded by your voluntary support.
	You can watch the show without it being behind a paywall.
	We have on the audio podcast, we have commercials that are there except for the people on Subscribestar.
	Those people we give a commercial free version of it to.
	But you can watch it live for free.
	You can watch it on the video channels that we put up.
	And you can find all those links.
	At TheDavidKnightShow.com, you can also find links if you'd like to support us.
	There's a lot of different ways that you can support us.
	These are people who sent us checks, though, in the first two weeks, and I just want to shout out and give them a thanks here.
	TK in Ohio, Marty K in New York, Mary N, Tom and Nancy K. Aaron F. Joel B. Teal C. Dale L. Anita S. Don S. I just read.
	Ronald C. Michael T. and T. Murr R. Thank you so much, all of you, for your support.
	Let's talk a little bit about geospatial intelligence because I had somebody ask me about that the other day.
	And I think it's very important.
	It's a... It's something that will not be mentioned, just like it used to be with the NSA. No such agency they used to joke about.
	Don't talk about the NSA. When called in during the Frank Church hearings in the Senate, they called in the CIA and held those hearings.
	It was about them spying on Americans without a search warrant, by the way.
	Which they did from their very creation.
	CIA and the NSA. In the House, Pike held hearings and he called in the NSA. That got no attention whatsoever.
	The press chose not to cover it when Pike asked the NSA, where's your charter?
	We're created by an executive or by the president.
	I'd like to see your charter. I'm not showing it to you.
	Oh, okay.
	You know, that's the way they handle it.
	Well, there's something else that kind of falls into that, and that's geospatial intelligence.
	And they kind of dance around it, but that's where James Clapper grew up through the bureaucracy to be a big guy.
	He rose up through the ranks of geospatial intelligence.
	They were having conventions prior to...
	The lockdowns in 2020, every year they would have a convention, 4,000 to 5,000 spooks would show up to talk about geospatial intelligence.
	It was a mapping of political and religious beliefs justified by 9-11, you know, because we're going to be attacked by religious fanatics, Islamicists.
	That was the story that came out of it.
	So we need to be able to map people's political and religious identities, and they use geospatial intelligence.
	The internet creation and social media creation was all tied into all of this.
	But here's what this looks like today.
	This is a couple of quotes.
	From General Mark Milley, as well as Alex Karp of Palantir.
	Palantir is one of these geospatial intelligence companies.
	That's what they do.
	And so this was at a conference that was about national security.
	The name of the conference was the Ash Carter Exchange on Innovation and National Security in Washington, D.C., And in it, you have Mark Milley.
	This is the headline here from Information Liberation.
	He gives a bizarre defense of what is happening in Israel.
	He says, we also have slaughtered innocent people in massive numbers.
	And let me just say this.
	Whenever you're talking about something, the morality of it, the ethics of it, it doesn't make it right because the people that you like or the people that are with you did it.
	It also doesn't make it wrong because you don't like the people who did it or whatever.
	And it doesn't excuse you if you're engaged in a crime.
	And we always see this, especially from the Democrats or Republicans.
	Well, you did that too, right?
	You did it. You did it.
	And a lot of times they're saying that because the Democrats did it and they're coming after Republicans for doing the same thing.
	But nobody ever came after the Democrats for doing it.
	None of that matters, really, does it?
	I mean, you broke the law, you broke the law.
	It doesn't matter if your neighbor also shot somebody else in the neighborhood.
	You both committed murder.
	It doesn't excuse you committing murder because your neighbor did it.
	And this is the logic that is there.
	This is the situational ethics that they put out there.
	Now, there's a bright red line of right and wrong that doesn't depend on whether or not your friends or enemies did it.
	Whether it's right or wrong is independent of that.
	Always is. So, here is Milley making his excuse and talking about U.S. war atrocities.
	Before we all get self-righteous about what Israel's doing...
	Judge not. Judge not.
	Well, we shouldn't forget that we, the United States, killed a lot of innocent people in Mosul and Raka.
	That we, the United States, killed 12,000 innocent French civilians.
	And here we are on the 80th anniversary of Normandy, on the prep fires for Normandy.
	We destroyed 69 Japanese cities, not including Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
	We slaughtered people in massive numbers.
	Innocent people who had nothing to do with their government.
	Men, women, and children.
	War is a terrible thing.
	But if it's going to have meaning, if it's going to have any sense of morality, it has to be a political purpose, and it must be achieved rapidly with the least cost.
	And that you do by speed.
	And one of the things that is personally very frustrating, the peace activists are actually the pro-war activists, and we're the peace activists.
	So you don't want war.
	You better be strong.
	You have to scare your adversary and you have to be willing to...
	Why do you say the peace activists are war activists?
	Because if you're the useful idiot of Iran and China begging...
	Literally, there are people on college campuses saying, be doing a pro-North Korea mantra.
	If you think that creates peace, you are literally...
	Why would Hamas ever give up?
	They have you marching for them.
	They're never going to give up.
	You are an infection inside of our society, and they are the reason they're not going to give up.
	If you want to stop these people, you have to be willing to be fierce.
	They're out there supporting a terrorist organization whose very written charter calls for the death of all Jews, not just in Israel, worldwide.
	I mean, come on now. If you're going to support that, you're on the wrong side.
	Okay, so the first one and the last one talking was Mark Milley.
	The one in the middle, if you're listening to the audio of this, was Alex Karp.
	The guy who was repeating the Orwellian phrase, war is peace.
	That's where these people are.
	And I'm sure that they both believe 2 plus 2 equals 5 as well.
	Yeah, war is peace. If you are arguing for peace, you're the war party, right?
	You're the one responsible for war.
	And what he says, you know, peace through strength, that type of thing.
	Well, certainly that is the case, right?
	Should have a strong defense.
	But that's a very different thing, isn't it?
	Having a strong military and showing a strong presence.
	Isn't that a very different thing than preemptively attacking the other countries?
	Which is what Alex Karp and Mark Milley do.
	That's why they're war criminals, right?
	Assassins, murderers, war criminals is what they are.
	You don't preemptively attack another country, okay?
	And so that's the real issue of what these guys have been doing.
	I'm going to say that's what's going on with the Israel thing.
	I think the problem with Israel is that they have not tried to minimize civilian casualties.
	And that's why you have Mark Milley who says, well, we slaughtered a lot of innocent civilians as well.
	And massive numbers.
	Well, you will answer for that.
	If not in this life, you'll answer to God for that.
	You really will. And so, but he's fine with that.
	It's fine. You know, we killed not just in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but we destroyed a lot of other Japanese cities, he said.
	And as I said the other day, all these people give you a false dichotomy.
	They give you a false choice.
	It's part of the Hegelian dialectic.
	You're being had when people say, well, it's either this or it's that.
	No, it's never either this or that.
	There's always other ways that you could do this.
	And as I said, you know, the argument for dropping the nuclear bombs on the Japanese cities was, well, we've got to save soldiers' lives.
	Because if we didn't drop the nuclear bombs on civilian cities, then we would have to fight the Japanese soldiers from island to island, and then we would lose a lot of American And they were the ones who started the war.
	Even though FDR baited it, even though FDR did what he could to shut down the early warning of it and all the rest of the stuff, the Japanese still did attack first.
	And so that still remains. Yes, I understand.
	FDR was passive-aggressive.
	He baited it.
	He facilitated it.
	But they did it.
	And that's another principle of just war.
	So it's justified to defend ourselves.
	And to try to defend this.
	But another precept of a just war from a Christian perspective is that you try to minimize civilian casualties.
	So do we have two options?
	We either fight them with the Marines, island to island, or we drop a nuclear bomb on a couple of civilian cities.
	They could have dropped the nuclear bombs on the islands, couldn't they?
	They could have taken out the combatants.
	Couldn't they have?
	Couldn't they have done that?
	Well, yes. See, that's why they don't ever talk about that.
	That would have been a justified response, quite frankly.
	Dropping it on civilian populations was not a justified response.
	It had become accepted by both sides during World War II that you would inflict massive civilian casualties on the other side.
	And that's why, you know, we look at World War II, it was not the last good war.
	We crossed the Rubicon on a lot of different things that affect the justified war in World War II. One of them being the targeting of civilian populations by both sides.
	And that doesn't make it right, the fact that both sides were doing it, does it?
	That's what I began by saying.
	Two wrongs don't make a right.
	Didn't your mommy tell you that?
	My mommy told me that.
	But did you hear what the new justification is from Milley for war?
	It must be done for political purposes.
	What? And it must be fast.
	What? That's it?
	It must be done for political purposes and fast?
	I mean, what war has ever happened...
	That wasn't done for political purposes.
	Every single war throughout the history of mankind has been for political purposes.
	It's been for the greed and power of whoever's ruling, whether it's the king or whether it's the empire or whatever.
	It's always been about political purposes.
	Everything the Roman Empire did was political purposes, wasn't it?
	Every war, whether it was justified or not, is about political purposes.
	What is he talking about?
	It's just absolute nonsense.
	Well, you know, for a war to be justified, it's got to be about political purposes, and it's got to be fast.
	He doesn't say that you have to try to avoid civilian casualties.
	Here's what a justified war is in a nutshell.
	You don't attack until you are attacked.
	Period. Period.
	No exceptions, no excuses, no, they did this or that.
	No, no. You don't attack unless you were attacked first.
	Secondly, you wear uniforms and do other things to try to minimize civilian casualties.
	Secondly, you do try to make it end as soon as possible in order to minimize both civilian and military casualties, which has never been a goal, by the way.
	You know, we say we want this war to be for political purposes and we want it fast.
	Well, then that means that every war that we've had since World War II has been unjustified by that benchmark.
	Because every war that we've had since World War II has been for a long-term training and testing of our, you know, training of the soldiers, testing of the weapons.
	They don't ever want to end these wars.
	To say that it has to be for political purposes and it has to be fast, this is a guy who was there at the Pentagon when they were telling us, yeah, we're going to be in Afghanistan forever.
	For another 20 years.
	They didn't leave Afghanistan.
	They were thrown out.
	They wanted it to last forever.
	And that's been the way that it's been in every single war that we've been involved in.
	So war is peace, right?
	You've got to attack these people before they attack us.
	Well, by that logic, if that's the logic, well, then I guess Hamas was justified, weren't they?
	No, they weren't.
	And even if, and I believe that it did happen, even if they stood down, even if Benjamin Netanyahu did a Pearl Harbor like FDR did, even if that was the case, they would still be justified in coming after Hamas.
	But not a relentless starvation campaign, bombing campaign of civilian population that can't fight back.
	That is not justified.
	Not justified. But it is absolutely in character with all of our wars since World War II. Never going to end it.
	And it'll be for whatever political purpose we want.
	It's always about a political purpose.
	Absolutely amazing to see that.
	And by the way, as I pointed out last week, Alex Karp had said in a previous one of these things, He's kind of come out of the woodwork now.
	He used to be kind of behind.
	He would always go to the Bilderberg Conference, but now, because of these protesters on campus, he's speaking out quite a bit about it, saying he'd like to drone his opponents in Silicon Valley and assassinate them.
	He's come up with all kinds of knee-jerk, hateful rhetoric about the people who are doing what they're doing for political purposes as well.
	He doesn't like free speech.
	He wants to punish these people.
	And again, if they take over campus and they start getting violent, if they take over buildings and they shut down schools, that's not free speech.
	And yet these people responded to say, well, you know, because they're doing these violent acts, we need to pass laws that are going to take down free speech.
	They've got another agenda.
	Milley said pro-Palestine protesters in America are, quote, out there supporting a terrorist organization and insisted that they're on the wrong side.
	Well, again, where's your moral compass?
	Is it wrong to do preemptive attacks?
	If it is, then the United States is also a terrorist organization.
	By the way, you know, we look at preemptive attacks and we look at how the beginning of the 21st century, the thing that was used to kick off So we've got to fight terror everywhere.
	You know, we've got to have a war against terror.
	Well, terror is a tactic.
	So that opens up everything.
	We had the perpetual blank check for wars everywhere called the authorization for the use of military force.
	We had all that. What was that predicated on?
	It's predicated on a terrorist attack.
	But the question is, was that terrorist attack done by people, our own people?
	Was it done by Tim Osman, also known as Osama bin Laden, or was it done by our own people?
	Here's what some of the 9-11 firefighters said about what happened with Building 7.
	I saw Building 7 come down, and it was a controlled demolition.
	A classic controlled demolition.
	That building had no reason to come down.
	There's no history. Captain Richard Patterson.
	And a fireproof, resulting in failure of the building because the building is, in New York City, parlance, a Class 1, which is a single word, fireproof.
	I demand to know, as should everyone, especially...
	New York Area Fire Commissioner Christopher Gioia.
	...made that day from over 150 police, firefighters, and first responders regarding explosions...
	Wasn't included in the commission report, nor investigated further.
	There was a secondary explosion, probably a device either planted before.
	Fire Department of New York Chief of Safety.
	Other firefighters.
	Heavy duty explosion.
	The whole building just collapsed on us, inside the lobby.
	Was that a secondary explosion? Yes it was.
	That was the plan.
	You want to call your mother or something?
	Five minutes and the elevators exploded on us.
	Yeah, we said something's wrong, yeah.
	I mean the plane hit up on the 88th floor.
	I mean, in five minutes, all of a sudden, now the elevator's exploding on the first level of the lobby?
	And it's the first thing I think of when I get up.
	And you heard those explosions. The last thing at night before I go to bed.
	I lost Tommy O'Hagan, Kenny Kumpel, and Bruce Van Hines that day.
	343 firefighters, including three of my good friends, Thomas Hetzel, Bobby Evans, and Mike Kiefer, perished that day.
	And these were some of the best and the bravest people in the world.
	And they, along with the rest of those who were murdered and died horrible deaths, deserved justice.
	Yeah. And we could name a lot of names of people who died from the other shooter drop.
	Yeah, we had three buildings that dropped with two planes on 9-11.
	And then the other shooter drop was 20 years later.
	And you had Donald Trump and his pal, 9-11 Rudy, who covered it up there in New York.
	These guys who pushed that thing through and bragged about pushing it through.
	As far as I look at this, I look at this medical martial law, the lockdown, the rest of the stuff that happened in 2020.
	I look at it as a fourth building of 9-11, is the way I look at it.
	Two months before 9-11, they did their simulation.
	One week after 9-11, they did the anthrax attack, and then they used that to push out the Model State Health Emergency Powers Act to get the states to give themselves the power to do what they did 20 years later, and Trump paid them to do it with the emergency declaration.
	And they practiced it at the federal government for 20 years.
	Every year they did one of these germ game things.
	Yeah. The way I look at this, I can just see Trump with his hand on the detonator pulling down the fourth building, the pandemic of 2020.
	So, you know, when you look at all this stuff and you look at these people talking about friends that they've lost, we've all got names, don't we?
	People that we know that have died or are dying from this shot.
	Mark Milley repeats debunked Israeli propaganda about beheadings and sexual assault, says Max Blumenthal.
	Well, look, we can argue about that kind of stuff over and over again, but...
	Again, when it's wartime, how do you know what's going on with any of this stuff?
	We do know that our allies, the Saudis, do beheadings all the time.
	So why do we care about beheadings, right?
	Because you use their thing.
	Well, you know, hey, we do it or they do it.
	That excuses it, right? Well, by that logic, then I guess we don't care about any beheadings.
	Because we support people who do that on a regular basis.
	What about sexual assault?
	Well, we got Abu Ghraib and all these other things.
	I mean, we got torture.
	We tortured people. Use the lies from torture to go into the Iraq War.
	And Trump appointed her as head of the CIA. The liar, the one who covered it up.
	He worked with Rudy Giuliani, who lied and covered up 9-11.
	Don't talk to me about Trump or any of these people.
	Is the civilian bombing only wrong if it's a suicide bombing?
	What if we have a suicide drone that kills a bunch of civilians?
	Is that still wrong? Do we have a justified war if you try to minimize the number of people that die, both military and civilian, by shortening it up?
	It's not just making it fast.
	And they haven't tried to make it fast either.
	So when we look at, there were other comments that were made by Alex Karp.
	Here is what he says about war.
	What I think is an often overlooked part of this battle is we kind of just think these things that are happening across college campuses especially are like a sideshow.
	No, they are the show. Because if we lose the intellectual debate, you will not be able to deploy any army in the West ever.
	That's right. So, if we lose the intellectual debate, we would never be able to deploy an army for no reason at all, right?
	As we constantly do, because we are an empire.
	Why do you think, we kind of all know that, right?
	Why do you think that George Lucas made the empire the bad guys?
	Hey Hans, are we the bad guys here?
	We're the empire, right? Yeah, empires have war for their political purposes, as Mark Milley was saying.
	That doesn't justify it.
	It just makes it even more despicable.
	You shouldn't have a war for political purposes.
	You should have a war to protect innocent lives and to terminate the killing because somebody was an aggressor and attacked you.
	That's why you have a war, Milley.
	But we have people like Millie at the Pentagon.
	We have people like Alex Karp running geospatial intelligence.
	And this next clip will explain a little bit more about what geospatial intelligence is.
	But yeah, if we have a country that obeyed a just war scenario, imagine that.
	They wouldn't be able to deploy their army for political purposes.
	Maybe that's the kind that we should have.
	If we lose the intellectual battle...
	We will not be able to deploy any army in the West ever.
	This is Alex Karp.
	These are the people, you know, Congress says, well, if we got anti-Semitism happening on the campus, we're going to shut down funds to it.
	I wish you would have shut it down when they had Marxist revolutionaries preaching a race war against white people.
	Why was that not good enough to shut down, right?
	It's been going on for a very long time, and you turn a blind eye to it until you get attacked like they attack white people.
	And then you care. It isn't about an intellectual battle.
	This is a spiritual, ethical, moral battle.
	This is a battle for the soul of our society and the soul of us each individually.
	It's not an intellectual battle.
	Alex Karp is wrong about that as well.
	But let's show...
	This is... A guy who looks at monitors intelligence and he talks about what Palantir is doing with geospatial intelligence.
	And they're not just working for the American government.
	They're also working for the Israeli government.
	An equivalent of the NSA. It's called Unit 8200.
	They're very...
	James Manford.
	Basically the same type of organization as the NSA. And...
	Palantir is one of the companies that's given, it's an American company, it's based in Denver, and it has given an enormous amount of assistance to Unit 8200 in terms of targeting.
	And that goes to the military.
	So the military targets civilians, lots of civilians.
	Most of the people killed were civilians, women and children have been the people who have been targeted in The occupied territories in Gaza.
	So, the NSA gives Unit 8200 an enormous amount of data from what it collects.
	When I interviewed Ed Snowden back in Moscow, after he went to Moscow taking all the data from the NSA, he said that was one of the worst offenses he saw when he was at NSA, that they were giving all this American data Palestinians talking overseas to relatives or friends in Palestine and the occupied territory.
	And NSA was giving that data to Unit 8200.
	So you have Unit 8200 that's collecting a lot of data from the United States, from Americans.
	They're using it for targeting, and Palatir is one of the companies that's Enormously sophisticated in terms of targeting.
	So what the problem is here is that you're getting information from the United States that the Israelis are using to target the civilians in Gaza.
	And there's been 33,000 killed now.
	It's just an enormous problem that the U.S. has got to stop supplying all this data and the target.
	And make no mistake about it, even though Palantir is saying, well, we're doing this abroad, and we're doing it for military purposes, and we're doing it for the American empire, right?
	They do it here at home as well.
	It's just like the FISA stuff.
	Oh, well, you know, that's for foreign intelligence surveillance.
	No, they use it against Americans.
	And Palantir is used against Americans, and will increasingly be used to target Americans for their political and religious beliefs.
	And guess what? They're not interested in the Muslims.
	They told you that. They're interested in the Christians.
	And when you look at the fact that they're targeting civilians, these are targeted killings, assassinations of political figures, and targeted killing of civilians.
	This is why Milley was trying to justify, oh, we killed a lot of civilians, Japanese civilians, and all the rest of this stuff.
	So that makes it okay? No, it doesn't make it okay.
	You didn't have to do that, as I said.
	You could have taken out the Japanese fortifications of nuclear weapons.
	But I saw the same thing from Robert McNamara, who ran the Vietnam War and kept running it and kept running it and kept running it.
	They would go in, they'd have battles, they'd win the battle, they'd take the stuff.
	McNamara and his people would say, move out, let them have it.
	And people who were fighting the war couldn't believe what was going on at the time.
	What? I mean, we just took this ground at a high cost, and you're telling us just to clear out and turn it back over to them?
	Yeah, yeah. Give us a body count.
	That's all we care. Did we kill more of them?
	They killed us. It's pretty obvious to me as a teenager in high school.
	This is a war game.
	A war game. I wasn't going to fight that game.
	It's a cynical war game.
	Testing their tactics, their strategies, and their equipment.
	And so when he talked about Vietnam, he admitted in the fog of war, Errol Morris documentary, he admitted that That Vietnam was based on a lie.
	He admitted that they kept it going.
	He admitted that they had no reason at all to be there.
	He admitted that he was told after the war, he was told, don't you understand?
	This is not a domino theory that you told everybody about.
	We've been fighting the Chinese for a thousand years.
	We weren't their puppets and so forth.
	And so what Robert McNamara did to try to excuse his actions, He said, well, if we had lost the war, we would have been tried as war criminals for the bombing of Dresden.
	And yet, perhaps they should have been.
	Perhaps they should have been under the just war theory.
	But that was even...
	There you're talking about a war that is going through the civilian areas and that type of thing.
	But he was throwing that out there.
	And he was saying, that was unjustified.
	And if you're going to give that a pass, then you give me a pass for what I'm doing here in Vietnam.
	Which is a completely different thing.
	Vietnam did not attack us.
	It was based on a lie.
	It was based on a false flag.
	McNamara kept it going and going and going.
	He was the ever-ready bunny that kept killing people on both sides.
	He was the ever-ready bunny that didn't care about winning the war.
	He just wanted to sustain it for his own purposes.
	The intellectual side of it, you know, the intellectual argument.
	So, there's one more aspect of this geospatial intelligence and Palantir and the rest of the stuff I want to talk about.
	This is an article from Vaccine Impact by Angel Havi.
	A Palestinian smart city, the most surveilled city on the planet.
	A military test city for future smart cities around the world.
	And, of course, you know, we know...
	Trump is on board with that as well.
	He calls his a freedom city.
	Oh, so it's completely different?
	No, it's exactly the same thing.
	He loves to do that kind of stuff.
	Oh, you guys don't like NAFTA? Okay, what we'll do is we'll call it the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement.
	How about that? USMCA. And we will change some of the deals there.
	In some regards, in many regards, it's worse than NAFTA was.
	But hey, it's completely different.
	Oh, no, it's not. It's Freedom Cities, same type of thing.
	And so Mint Press, which is, I think it's Iranian, it is an Arab thing, published a documentary, and it's about 10 minutes long, I'm going to show you about the first minute of it, where they're talking about life under a smart city, living in a smart city, where everything you do, And, of course, the Chinese are doing this in a lot of regards to biometric surveillance and face scans and everything that are happening there.
	But, you know, this is another aspect of what it'll be like to live under a government that has been taken over as our government has been taken over in Washington.
	The American government, whether you're talking about Republicans or Democrats, is absolutely against us.
	They pay no even lip service anymore to the Constitution.
	It is an occupier government.
	It is a criminal government focused on us and gradually laying down the chains of a smart city.
	This is what it looks like in Hebron.
	This is Hebron, known to Palestinians as the city of Al Khalil.
	This is the West Bank's largest and most populated city.
	Hebron is dubbed by Israel as Hebron's smart city, where the apartheid state tests its draconian surveillance technology on the Palestinian population as part of what is called the Wolfpack surveillance system.
	This is a vast database that includes all information about each and every single Palestinian, including where they live, work, go to school, who their family members are, and if they are wanted for questioning.
	Palestinians in Hebron are the most surveilled people on the planet.
	Wherever I go as Palestinian, I can see various cameras.
	But those cameras, it will never make me innocent.
	But something very important, what makes me feel uncomfortable, while I'm crossing through the checkpoint, the soldier asks me to look at the camera.
	Yeah, yeah. Well, you saw those dossiers.
	It links everybody up to their dossier they've got.
	This is exactly what Alex Karp wants to do everywhere, including America.
	That's what he wants.
	And he'll become richer and richer and more linked into the empire by doing that.
	The Palestinian section of Hebron is very obviously the world's most advanced smart city.
	A blueprint for future 15-minute smart cities are being planned throughout the United States.
	Freedom cities by Trump.
	Like Palestinian Hebron, says a vaccine impact, these cities will be literal outdoor prisons where everything people do in these cities is tracked and you can only enter or leave by providing a face scan.
	They may start out as FEMA camps in the U.S., Well, the government is going to need places to house migrants and dissenters, those who refuse government edicts like mandatory drugs and vaccines, those who are arrested on the upcoming anti-Semitism laws that are in the pipeline.
	Yeah, that's right. They keep adding those laws, don't they?
	And so Biden, now they know all this stuff, right?
	Look at all that detail that they've got there.
	Look at the detail the United States government has, the detail that Israel has, and Palantir, and they're sharing this information with everybody.
	Now, the Biden administration has offered Israel intel on Hamas leaders if Israel quits the Rafa attack.
	You mean they didn't have it?
	Come on.
	Ha ha. I mean, first of all, you know, some of the comments that they made in this article from Breitbart, it's like, wait a minute, the U.S. had that and they didn't give it to Israel?
	It's like, yeah, they had it and they didn't give it to Israel.
	Probably didn't need to because Israel's got it as well.
	It was a choice, folks.
	It was a choice, just like it was a choice to bomb Nagasaki and Hiroshima instead of the islands where the soldiers were, where the Japanese soldiers were.
	It was a choice.
	To go after the civilian population.
	It was a choice there as well.
	They could have come after these Hamas leaders.
	They know where these... A lot of them are being harbored in Qatar, right?
	Let's see, Qatar. Yeah, that's right.
	Qatar, our military ally in the Middle East, harboring Hamas.
	The same people who are paying off Bob Menendez and gold bars.
	Yeah, those people. Our allies.
	Like the Saudis.
	With allies like that, who needs enemies, right?
	Right. The Biden administration has reportedly offered Israel intelligence on the whereabouts of Hamas leaders and tunnels underneath Gaza.
	If Israel ends its ongoing attack in the last Hamas stronghold in the Gaza town of Rafa.
	The Washington Post reported on Saturday, the Biden administration...
	Working urgently to stave off a full-scale Israeli invasion of Rafah is offering Israel valuable assistance if it holds back, including sensitive data to help the Israeli military pinpoint the location of Hamas leaders and find the group's hidden tunnels, according to four people familiar with the U.S. offers.
	The offer puzzled observers, says Breitbart, who wondered why the Biden administration didn't simply give Israel the intelligence need to find the Hamas leaders, especially as five Americans are still hostage, as I said before.
	It's probably because both Israel and the United States have that information.
	Because they know where they are.
	Because they have a different agenda out of all this stuff.
	Because wars are for political purposes, as Milley said.
	It's not about trying to save human life.
	It's not about trying to have peace.
	It's about a perpetual state of war.
	As Alex Karp said, if you want peace, you're the problem.
	You've got to be eliminated if you want peace.
	We're going to be ruled by these war-mongering, war-selling, war-profiteering people.
	That's what he wants to have happen.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	♪♪♪
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	you Just read a couple of the inserts that were in the letters that we've got here.
	I read the names earlier. Dan says, thank you so much for the effort you put in your newscast.
	I felt alone before finding it.
	So that's the key. They want us to think nobody else thinks like this, right?
	That was the key throughout all of 2020.
	You know, you're the only one who has relatives who died.
	You're the only one that sees the absurdity of these masks and the six-foot distancing and all the rest of this and the lines on the floors and all the rest of this stuff.
	You're the only one. You know, you're the odd man out.
	Nobody else sees this. You're all alone.
	Even if you're absolutely certain that you're right, they still want you to feel alone.
	They said, I had a government job a few years ago.
	I quit when I saw just how crooked every politician I had to deal with are.
	I do building now.
	Nothing is getting built out without bribes.
	Both parties are crooks and scumbags.
	That's right, Dan. Another one.
	Sorry I missed April's payment.
	Well, thank you so much.
	I'll try to do better. Well, thank you very much.
	I appreciate that. You don't have to thank me on air just for not taking up time.
	Tell David to not give up.
	I know it feels like he's just speaking into space.
	Yeah, it does. They have all of us feel like we are isolated.
	Most of my friends are liberals.
	I talk to them all the time.
	Might as well be speaking to a wall, says Aaron.
	Well, that's the key thing.
	And look, this is why we're not going to get through this.
	Without a moral backbone that comes from faith and faith alone.
	You have to understand that if you're the only one, you still are called to do what the right thing is.
	But you're typically not the only one.
	Just like Elijah.
	He says, I'm the only one left.
	And then God opens his eyes.
	And he says, no, I've got 7,000 that I've reserved.
	That have not bowed the knee to this bail.
	And so we need to understand it's always going to be the case.
	We're always going to feel like we're alone, like we're isolated, but we're not alone if we have a connection with God.
	Let's talk a little bit about this anti-Semitism stuff.
	As we mentioned on Friday, Gard and I were talking about this.
	The Senate bill being put out by Marsha Blackburn here in Tennessee, seeking to place campus protesters on a no-fly list.
	Marsha, Marsha, how do you justify there being any such thing as a no-fly list?
	Have you ever read the Constitution that you swore to uphold?
	How in the world do you justify a no-fly list for anything?
	Look, if somebody's committed a crime, We have a process.
	It's called due process.
	You are allowed to know what the charges against you are.
	You are allowed to have a lawyer operate in your defense.
	You're allowed to have evidence presented in your defense as well as being allowed to see the evidence against you.
	When they put people on a no-fly list, you don't even know what you're charged with.
	You don't even know you're on the list until you can't go anywhere.
	As Karen and I were talking about, she said, that's another reason for you not to fly.
	Just the fact that you don't like to fly.
	The cattle car thing, the TSA stuff, and all the rest of this.
	And she said, you likely fly somewhere and you get stuck there.
	Just like that guy in Hawaii that you talked to 10 years ago, 11 years ago, 12 years ago.
	And, you know, they don't even tell you.
	What you're charged with. How do you defend yourself?
	You're not allowed to defend yourself.
	How do you get on it?
	Well, I'm not telling you.
	How do I get off? I'm not telling you.
	This is, in the no-fly list, if you get involved in it, it's more like Kafka than it is Orwell or Huxley.
	It's this bizarre authoritarian, totalitarian state.
	You don't really know. How did I get on this?
	What is it? How do I clear my name?
	Well, not telling you. Not telling you.
	And this is what Marsha Blackburn wants.
	Look, you've got a problem with somebody.
	We have a process that's there.
	And the only reason Marsha Blackburn is doing this is because she wants to pander for donations to the Israeli government and to AIPAC. And it's disgusting.
	Nothing disgusts me more than to see these political whores like Marsha Blackburn out there prostituting themselves to a foreign government to shut down The Constitution and the Bill of Rights that so many Americans have died for.
	You're pathetic. You're absolutely pathetic.
	Rename the GOP to the grand old pandering.
	It's not a party anymore.
	They're just pandering. Pandering to a foreign government to get paid for attacking our Constitution and our Bill of Rights.
	You're disgusting.
	Absolutely disgusting.
	Any politician doing this, folks, in public, pandering in public to a foreign government.
	Like I talked about DeSantis and his, you know, making it a felony to say things that may be lies, may be hateful.
	I don't care. It's free speech.
	That's how free speech operates.
	Grow a skin. Get a thick skin.
	I'm sick and tired of these snowflake Jewish people, these snowflake lefties, these snowflake conservatives and liberals who, oh, they criticize me.
	I want them purged. I want them canceled.
	I want them in jail.
	That type of stuff. Come on.
	Come on. I don't care about your feelings anymore.
	Yeah, let's have a debate about the truth.
	We can't have a debate about the truth if you're going to take away our free speech.
	She is selling out our heritage for her bowl of porridge.
	The Esau Party.
	That's what the GOP has become.
	They're selling out our inheritance for their temporary bowl of porridge.
	Just amazing to me.
	For a foreign government. And let me just say one more thing about that.
	These people who do this in public...
	What do you think Marsha Blackburn and other whores like her are doing in private to get money?
	Really, seriously. If they will sell you out to a foreign government and do it in public, what do you think they're doing privately?
	What kind of deals?
	They got a closet filled with gold bars like Menendez?
	GOP senators now want the IRS to yank tax-exempt status for these organizations like these Soros organizations.
	The Tides Foundation, Westpac, and these other...
	Look, why do they even have tax-exempt status in the first place?
	It's like these universities.
	The Tides Foundation, Westpac, these universities like Harvard, Yale, and all of them now.
	It began with the Ivy League colleges, but it's now pretty much all of these universities.
	Why are they getting government funds?
	Why are they getting, in the case of the colleges, why are these George Soros NGOs getting tax-exempt status when they're organized to tear down our society?
	Well, that's because we've got senators who are tearing down our society for cash as well.
	That's why. But now they want to stop it.
	Now they want to stop it.
	Now it's gone too far. Now they've attacked Israel.
	So now it's got to be stopped.
	They didn't care when these organizations like the Tides Foundation was going to destroy America.
	They didn't care when George Soros is using his political clout to give millions of dollars to district attorneys and local races just swamping it with money.
	In order to create chaos by letting the criminals run free.
	Yeah, you arrest the criminals, he just turns right back out on the street.
	Was that a problem? Well, they didn't want to do anything about these subversive NGOs before, but now they've got to do something about it.
	Now, you know, they had their tax-exempt status, but now we're going to take away their tax-exempt status.
	Soros has been funding Students for Justice in Palestine, the constellation of nonprofits which lead to the billionaire agitator.
	They are trained to rise up to revolution.
	And the donors, the donors...
	Left and right have been funding this stuff on the universities, and it was just fine, to raise up this Jacobin mob until the Jacobin mob turned on them.
	And now it's got to stop, right?
	But still, not going to be any monitors for anti-white hatred on the college campuses.
	No, not at all. Even suggest something like that.
	That'll get you on the list from the ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center.
	It's being anti-Semitic to say that we ought to equally...
	Yeah, you want equity?
	You want diversity? How about we have equal treatment under the law?
	How about you say that all racism is wrong?
	Instead of excusing it and funding it against white people and then cracking down on it when it's against Jewish people or against a foreign government even.
	So it's not just a no-fly list.
	You've also got GOP senators demanding that the IRS investigate these pro-Palestine groups for supporting terrorists.
	Yeah, let's weaponize the government against them.
	Let's weaponize the IRS. Look, there's due process that's out there.
	Again, they're going to the wrong types of prescriptions for this.
	They never cared as long as these groups were weaponized against us, against America, against white people.
	But now it's against Jewish people and it's against a foreign government.
	Now we care. Is that right?
	Fifteen Republican senators are demanding the IRS investigate whether non-profit groups are helping pro-Hamas groups.
	And so, again, the duplicity never ends.
	For example, this is what they're saying.
	The IRS has grounds to revoke their tax-exempt status.
	In fact, the IRS has set the precedent that organizations have been held not to qualify for 501c3 status On grounds of the activities of these organizations in question contravene public policy, even though the organizations did not violate any federal statutes or state or local law.
	So why didn't they do this before?
	Against the Tides Foundation or these other Soros organizations?
	We know what they're doing to our society, but senators couldn't be bothered by that.
	I guess it's because we don't have money to give them.
	Is that right? And they don't really care about votes.
	Elections are nonsense anyway.
	So we don't have any influence with these people.
	They don't represent us.
	They represent the people who can give them lots of money.
	So you've got...
	Now, this one thing that I've seen, I've seen this on...
	On Twitter a lot. A resurfaced video shows Trump calling for the death penalty to punish anti-Semitism.
	I think, in all fairness, and you know that I don't like Trump, and you know I don't like these overreactions to this stuff either, but I think that in that context, that came after there was a shooting at a synagogue that day in Pennsylvania.
	And I... I think when he's talking about this, I think the crime he's talking about is not the crime of anti-Semitism.
	I think he's talking about the crime of mass murder, saying we need to bring back the death penalty.
	So just when we look at these things, I think that is a canard to say that as well.
	But if you look at the most absurd thing that has come out of all this stuff, this is a House GOP member.
	Drafting articles of impeachment against Biden because he threatened to stop aid to Israel.
	How is that an impeachable offense?
	This is the most obvious pandering of all of these things, being done by a first-term congressman from Florida, probably has a lot of Jewish constituents, Corey Mills from Florida, preparing impeachment articles against Biden over his threat to halt U.S. offensive aid to Israel.
	He accused Biden of forcing Israel into a quid pro quo situation by leveraging U.S. dollars against the Israeli government's actions in Gaza.
	Does this idiot know that everything the government does with money is quid pro quo?
	That's what I'm trying to explain to the MAGA neophytes who don't understand how government works.
	Everything is about bribery.
	Everything is about blackmail.
	Everything is about quid pro quo.
	You do this, you don't do that, or there's going to be a financial penalty on it.
	There's also the fact that is it a bad thing that we would get a return for our investment?
	Even if we look at it from that angle, expecting something back isn't wrong.
	We're giving how many billions to these people?
	Yeah, yeah. We should not expect them to do anything on our behalf, right?
	This is so absurd in every aspect of it.
	We don't expect anything positive back for the billions that we're going to give you.
	We just give it to you because we give it to you because this is the way it works.
	As I said before, there's no better return on investment than buying a politician in Congress.
	You give they give you millions or billions and you give them thousands.
	That's just how it works.
	That's an amazing return on investment.
	And it works that way for foreign governments.
	It works that way for corporations.
	It works that way for any special interest.
	You can buy these politicians.
	They're for sale. And he is offering himself for sale right there.
	How in the world do you impeach of all the things that Biden has done?
	You're going to impeach him because he threatened to not give money to a foreign government?
	Where does he get the constitutional authority to do that anyway?
	Right? It's just like the no-fly thing, or the IRS, the weaponized IRS. Well, let's weaponize the IRS even more.
	See, that's why the Republicans don't pull back on this army of 80,000 IRS agents that Biden wants.
	This is why Johnson completely funded it.
	Didn't even pull it back a little bit like McCarthy did.
	He completely funded it.
	Why? Because they run the same game.
	Because it's the Uniparty.
	Because they're exactly the same.
	This is just a personal quest for power and greed for all of these people.
	Even somebody like Mike Johnson who tries to hide behind a Christian veneer.
	He's playing the same game all the rest of these people do.
	He's for sale.
	Again, throughout the 2020 stuff, everything that Trump was doing was quid pro quo.
	And yet now it's a problem.
	Comment from Information Liberation said, is the GOP ever going to do anything for America?
	Or are they just going to continue to exclusively serve the interests of Israel?
	I'm disgusted with these people.
	Absolutely disgusted.
	But it's not enough.
	According to a Jewish screenwriter who is in the UK, he's gotten Grammy nominations, a Golden Globe Award.
	He has a sub-stack page.
	name is Lee Kern. He wrote a piece that said, hurt don't heal the anti-Semite. He begins his letter by writing, quote, the attempt to disabuse the world of anti-Semitism has been a monumental failure. He went on to say that since anti-Semitic acts and vitriol acts against Jews are on the rise, he suggests, quote, increase our safety and we need a new approach. He says let's not bother And of course, since they don't like free speech, they don't want to debate you either.
	They just want to hurt you, right?
	And here's the issue.
	When you look at minority groups, it's the same thing I said about the Black Lives Matter movement.
	I said, why are these people saying it only affects us?
	You know, we have excess police force and police brutality, but it only affects black people.
	Shut up. You're not affected.
	You know, we can't say all lives matter.
	We can't say white lives matter.
	But we can't say all lives matter.
	No, it's only black lives.
	And they're doing the same thing now.
	The Jews are doing the same thing with this.
	This is only about Jews, and shut up.
	If you say anything other than that, you know, we don't want to make common cause with anybody.
	And I said, this is ridiculous.
	I said, yes, as a proportion...
	When you look at interactions with the police and incarcerations and things like that, there's a higher percentage of black people involved.
	However, the number of white people is even higher.
	And when you look at the situations where the police have got it wrong, have excessive force and things like that, there's actually more white people out there.
	If you really want to change something, why wouldn't you make common cause with the majority of the people who are out there?
	Why would you make it only about yourself?
	Well, the reason that was happening was because they were Marxists, because they were trying to divide and overthrow our country, right?
	They didn't want to really solve the police problem.
	They wanted to use it.
	I don't think the Jews, as this guy is saying, we don't want to talk about this.
	We don't want to heal this.
	We don't want to solve the problem.
	We just want to hurt them, right?
	That's what he's saying. Let's have a war.
	This is all about sowing seeds of division and chaos.
	It's not about healing. It's not about having a debate.
	They don't want debate. You don't say anything unless they give you permission.
	He says the future of Jewish safety is not in teaching the world to be better people, but in teaching them to watch their step.
	I'm sorry, I don't pay any attention to people like that.
	As far as I'm concerned, he's as big a problem as any neo-Nazi out there.
	He's every bit as big a problem as that.
	He's just a mere image of them.
	This screenwriter. And you wonder why this happens?
	It's because we've got award-winning people, people like him, writing screenplays, pushing this kind of hate, violence, sexual stuff, drug use.
	They're the ones that get the awards in Hollywood.
	They're the ones who get the jobs.
	This is what Hollywood is about and has been for a very long time.
	It's just now gotten to the point where they're pushing the LGBT stuff so much, and they've completely lost any ability to even do a script or execute anything.
	We need to stop attempting to teach our haters to be nice to us, he says, but rather teach them that there's a cost to their transgressions.
	Putting it bluntly, we need to teach the world that we will F up anyone who tries to hurt us.
	That's the lesson we need to be pushing.
	It matters not one jot that they know where anti-Semitism leads for the Jews.
	We need to show them where anti-Semitism leads for them, the perpetrators of anti-Semitism.
	And they will define what anti-Semitism is.
	They've got a group out there, an NGO, and they will define what it is.
	You see, it's always the case when we have wars that we don't become the monsters that we fight.
	And in so many different ways, in so many of these people, as with this screenwriter, he's become the monster that he fought.
	Does he realize how much he sounds like Adolf Hitler?
	New York is now blocking white-owned businesses from bidding on a new $2.3 billion job.
	It's downright shocking to see this latest story unfold, and you will wonder how they get away with such blatant discrimination and racism.
	I guess it's because we don't have anybody monitoring that, do we?
	Yet here it is, all wrapped up in the guise of diversity, equity, and inclusion, as long as it excludes white people, of course.
	And that's the newest racist, divisive directive out of New York, where white-owned businesses are now barred from even bidding on the new $2.3 billion JFK airport renovation.
	You see, the approach has been, we'll do it to them before it happens to us.
	The approach has been, we will do what the Nazis did to us before anybody does it to us.
	That's been the approach. This is not about a colorblind society.
	This is not about healing.
	This is not about making people better.
	This is about them getting their way.
	And I've had enough of it.
	Bloomberg reports a year after the George Floyd attacks, you had the Standard& Poor's 100 hired 300,000 people, 94% of them non-white.
	Couldn't find any white people qualified?
	No. This is targeted racism and discrimination.
	And this has been this way since the 70s.
	And it's not getting any better.
	They don't want to heal anything.
	They just want their way. It's like when you look at the feminism stuff, right?
	Oh, we hate the patriarchy.
	Well, it's because they want to establish a matriarchy.
	It isn't because they want to have anything that's complementary or equal or anything.
	No, no, no. They want to be the rulers.
	That's what this is all about.
	We need to understand that there are people, good people on both sides, and we need to call out the bad people on both sides and not worry about the labels that they're going to attach to us.
	I really don't care.
	And you shouldn't care either.
	We'll be right back. Thank
	So, I'm going to go ahead and get my stuff. I'm going to go ahead and get my stuff. I'm going to go ahead and get my stuff.
	I'm going to go ahead and get my stuff.
	I'm going to go ahead and get my stuff.
	Making Sense.
	It's common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Alright, let's talk about some other people who are radical protesters.
	We don't seem to have anybody monitoring the green people who are also trying to destroy everything in our way of life.
	Here are some elderly people.
	I thought this was a perfect picture of what this green agenda, Greta Thunberg and the rest of them, they attacked the Magna Carta.
	Literally attacked. I mean, they've been attacking it in its essence and its substance for a long time.
	They literally attacked it.
	I mean, they take hammers and chisels to the case that is actually holding the physical document.
	And a couple of elderly people...
	Doing it for the Just Stop Oil.
	By the way, Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation gave a lot of money to these protesters.
	I said, look at these old people, these fossil fools who are trying to destroy the foundation of our society.
	Look at this. He's got a chisel and a hammer.
	He's going to try to take the case out so they can destroy the Magna Carta.
	And here's a person filming it.
	Multiple people filming it.
	This is another person, I guess, who's just walking by, and he's trying to get it on his stream.
	Somebody else has already got a camera.
	There's another person, a professional camera there.
	They're part of the organization as well.
	Let's get these old people to take this down.
	This famous document is about the rule of law, she says.
	And standing up against it.
	Yes, I'm going to receive an award. Our government is breaking it.
	Our laws, as a Christian, I am compelled to do all that I can to alleviate the appalling suffering that's coming back in line and is here already.
	Yes. The end is near.
	She's speaking from a personal perspective, I think.
	Yes. I, as a Christian...
	Oil. We must just stop oil.
	Yeah. Some people never learn, do they?
	How do you get this old and stay that stupid?
	It's just absolutely amazing.
	Any day now, there's going to be tremendous suffering coming down the line.
	They were told that we were all going to have worldwide famine in the 1970s.
	They were told that we're going to be out of oil by these same people that have given us 50 plus years of false prophecies, false scientific modeling, and all the rest of the stuff.
	And they're still stupid enough to believe this.
	It's absolutely unbelievable.
	It is, oh, Scott Helmer, thank you for the tip.
	He says, thanks for sharing my song, David.
	I really appreciate it. I liked your music a lot.
	And by the way, if you go to his site, you can see I mixed the two of them together.
	He's got one that's got the lyrics to it, and he's got another one where you can see him singing it up close as well.
	He says, in 2021, I publicly refused to perform at any shows with a mask or vaccine mandate, and I paid a heavy price for planting that flag publicly.
	But I'm glad I stood my ground.
	I am too. Good for you. Everyone must peacefully stand up and say no in their own way.
	We the people have all the power, yet they want everybody to feel alone and isolated.
	Absolutely right. And so, yeah, I appreciate you putting that song together.
	And we need more people to speak out, sing out, in defiance of this stuff.
	And that's true of this other MacGuffin as well.
	These people are cultural Marxists.
	They want to destroy the rule of law.
	They want to destroy the great charter, the Magna Carta, that began this march over centuries to establish the legal framework we have here.
	These are the people who want to overthrow the law.
	And they want to do it on the basis of failed alarmism for centuries.
	This I thought was interesting.
	Climate change...
	It's driven by changes in orientation of the Earth to the Sun.
	Not by carbon emissions, says a new analysis from Berkeley.
	Berkeley Earth Data.
	Who knew? Isn't it funny?
	I mean, you got this situation.
	We all know, but what is the source of the heat, right?
	Even if their models are right and they're wrong, they're not right, they're wrong about CO2 trapping the heat.
	Where does the heat come from? It comes from the Sun.
	And I've said this before.
	I said, you know, if you don't understand that the sun is a source of our climate as well and our orientation, okay?
	Did you ever notice that as you get further away from the equator, somehow it gets colder?
	Have you ever noticed that we have these seasons and everything?
	Is it because of our...
	Orientation to the sun, that we have these big variations of temperature on our planet?
	Why would we think then that it is the CO2, which is 0.04% of the atmosphere?
	Why would we think it's that?
	And why would we think that it is the human component of that, which is infinitesimally small?
	What was that? Something like 2.5 ten thousandths of a percent.
	I did it earlier.
	But it's absolutely absurd.
	And you're going to ignore the fact that it's the sun?
	Well, it's because they want to use this as an excuse to control people.
	They can't control the sun.
	And, you know, everybody's talking about the solar storm.
	And, oh, is it going to take out our GPS? Is it going to take out our satellites?
	Is it going to take out our electric grid and all the rest of the stuff?
	And yet... You know, that's just a particle emission that's there.
	What about the changes in solar activity?
	What about the changes in our orientation to the sun?
	And I've made this argument before, and I remember somebody coming back, and that's the dumbest argument I've ever heard.
	It's like, seriously? Are you that dense that you don't understand that the sun is a source of heat?
	And you don't understand that it is the source of heat, and it is the issue in terms of our climate?
	So I say, we...
	I have to not be afraid when really stupid people or people who work for the government as trolls, as paid trolls, when they attack us with stuff.
	If we're wrong, we're wrong, but we shouldn't be afraid to be challenged by any of that stuff.
	And quite frankly, I think you and I knew that the sun was what was causing our climate a long time ago.
	On Rockfin, Jason Barker would like to know if Scott would be alright with him posting links to his music on Knights of the Storm website.
	Well, you can connect them.
	I imagine he probably would be fine with that.
	You know, if people watch the music or listen to it on streaming services, he gets paid that.
	And I don't know.
	He might sell CDs.
	If you like to get CDs, he might have that as well.
	I don't know. But again, Jason would like to know Scott, so you might want to let him know.
	So the data from Berkeley Earth shows a significant difference in the rate of temperature increase between summer and winter in Greenland, with winter warming over four times more rapidly than it does in summer.
	Who would have thought it?
	A significant seasonal variation in the rate of warming is not specific to Greenland.
	It is global.
	We're not talking about global climate change.
	You've got to include the sun in your calculations there.
	Travis, pull this up. This article is under the climate thing here.
	Because there is a chart that's a little bit further down.
	I want people to see. There is a correlation between the warming rate...
	And the latitude. That's right.
	If you get further away from the equator, guess what?
	It gets faster.
	It gets warmer faster.
	Whoa! Who would have...
	Whoa! I can't believe this.
	You're like Jim Ignatowski.
	Whoa! Whoa! With a decreasing trend and warming rate as we move from north to south, this analysis suggests that the change in orientation of the earth to the sun, known as the Milankovitch cycles, is the primary driver of climate change.
	And so when you look at this chart they have, they show, they pick one spot, and they have Greenland, and they have the rate of temperature change in Greenland from 1860 to 2020.
	And what they show is, if you look at this chart, do you find it?
	What article? It is climate change is driven by the sun, okay?
	And so if you look at this chart, he's working on it now here.
	Winter, you see, there we go.
	Pull it down there. There's a significant difference in the rate of warming.
	Winter, it warms much, much faster than it does in the summer, for example.
	And autumn and spring differ slightly from each other.
	Guess what's not changing seasonally?
	CO2. Methane.
	Nitrogen. Any of these things that they have identified so that they can curtail our food, our activity, our energy, anything.
	So the CO2 is not changing.
	But the rate of warming changes significantly based on the season, and that is because of our orientation to the sun.
	What a surprising thing, isn't it?
	I mean, it's just groundbreaking.
	I know you never suspected this.
	But now we've got even more nonsense coming out of Washington, D.C. A new U.S. government study claims that up to a quarter of urban air pollution is from cooking food.
	And so there you go.
	So we're going to have to stop cooking.
	As a matter of fact, we've got to stop food because the raising of food is even worse, they said.
	So cooking is causing air pollution, but they're not going to be satisfied if you eat your food raw.
	They don't want you growing the food either.
	As a matter of fact, they don't want you.
	They want zero population growth, which is to say they want zero population.
	Well, we're gonna take a quick break and we will be right back.
	♪♪
	Analyzing the globalist's next move.
	♪♪ And now, The David Knight Show.
	All right, let's talk about the literal pharmakia.
	You know, the word in the Bible, pharmakia, is frequently in the Greek word.
	It's the root of where we get pharmacy, right?
	Pharmaceuticals is pharmakia.
	But it is typically translated as sorcery because it's always been a part.
	Hallucinogenic drugs have always been a part of pagan religions for a large amount.
	And now as we become increasingly pagan, it looks like it's going to be a part of our society now as well.
	We have the son of the guy who was one of the founders of Lulamon.
	You know, the yoga pants stuff, I guess.
	J.J. Wilson plots to make psychedelic drugs the new yoga.
	And he'd probably sell overpriced mushrooms like his dad sells overpriced yoga clothes.
	Many people switched out alcohol for psychedelic edibles during the pandemic.
	See, it's a gift that just keeps on giving to these people, isn't it?
	This is from Daily Beast.
	But J.J. Wilson, the eldest son of multi-billionaire, billionaire with a B, Lulamon founder Chip Wilson, went one step further.
	Not satisfied with simply feeling amazing, he said, and not being hungover.
	He decided to become one of the world's first psychedelic tycoons.
	In 2021, he co-founded a pharma-grade psychedelics manufacturer, which he named Optima Health.
	And he's got lots of money from his multi-billionaire dad.
	The company today is on the brink of receiving a top-tier Health Canada license to purvey naturally-grown psilocybin and lab-made MDMA. That's the ecstasy party drug.
	To legal medical markets around the world.
	And so, yeah, we will have people who will...
	Use drugs to escape the reality.
	I mean, we're just talking about the drunks on Skid Row, and they will help to facilitate that, just like in California.
	They give them lineup, and we'll give you shots of alcohol for the homeless people on the street.
	We'll keep you hooked.
	They want you hooked on this stuff.
	Yuval Harari, World Economic Forum, he says, yeah, we're going to have people...
	You know, you're going to be living in your garage, just like Ready Player One.
	You're going to be playing video games, virtual reality.
	We'll give you drugs, all that kind of stuff, just to keep you isolated, keep you out of our way while we run the world.
	You really want that for yourself in the future?
	You don't have to have a life like that.
	A brave new world is coming, he predicts, in which most people will micro-dose psychedelics to banish daily scruples.
	I looked at that and I thought, is that a different use of the word?
	And actually, it turns out they might be talking about sometimes scruples.
	It's not the main use that we have for it, but sometimes it is used to refer to hesitation or reluctance.
	So maybe they're saying you just lose your inhibitions.
	Is that a good thing? Is it a good thing to lose your scruples, your moral compass or anything?
	I don't know, but that's what they say.
	This is the first positive effect here.
	Lose your daily scruples.
	I remember when we were at the British Museum, they had a sign up in the bathroom at the sink.
	And it says, please do not perform your daily ablutions here.
	And I was like, what?
	I had to look it up.
	Ablutions were washings, right?
	So they were telling the homeless people, don't take a bath in the sink type of thing, right?
	Just wash your hands and that's it.
	But... This is a different...
	So these are not your daily ablutions.
	These are your daily scruples, and you're going to lose them.
	It will enhance your focus and boost your well-being.
	There we go. Psychedelics are the next yoga, says Wilson.
	And this is not Brian Wilson.
	Ask him how it turned out for him using drugs.
	Or Jim Ignatowski.
	So, yeah, it's the next yoga.
	No, it's the next... Spiritual dimension is what it is that they want to get you involved in, and you should understand that.
	Also, in terms of the Balkanization of America, the Babylonization of America, if you will, the alarm of a nine-year-old girl being attacked at school for not being a Muslim.
	And the school administrators and the teachers came out to the mom when she was lined up to pick up her kid and said, you know, she was attacked today.
	And they explained to her that she was singled out and attacked by a mob of Muslim girls in Minnesota, where they've had a lot of Islamic immigration.
	You know, isn't it interesting that our wonderful GOP leader, Mike Johnson, decided that he wouldn't spend a penny on protecting our border, but he would sneak in, what was it, two and a half, three and a half billion dollars?
	Who knows? Who cares, right?
	We're only talking about billions of dollars.
	But he would sneak that into the Israeli aid, For what?
	To bring Palestinians in, which is what Biden wants to do?
	Because Mike Johnson does whatever Biden wants to do.
	So we'll have a lot more Muslims that won't just be in Minnesota.
	As a matter of fact, the name of this town, interestingly enough, is Savage Minnesota.
	Well, they savaged a nine-year-old girl there because she wasn't Muslim.
	And she was jumped by a group of girls who were Muslim, picked on her.
	This is in an elementary school.
	The report explained that Larson said her daughter's third grade teacher and the school principal approached her in the school pickup line and told her what happened.
	They came up from my vehicle, informed me there had been an incident at school that day.
	They wanted to make it very apparent that my daughter didn't do anything to cause this.
	And they told me this was a calculated incident that she had been attacked on the playground by four other students in her grade.
	Now, these kids are just nine years old.
	Imagine what they're going to be like when they get older.
	I ended up learning that this is due to her race and her religion, because she wasn't Muslim.
	So that was pretty jarring to hear.
	It was the attackers themselves who told the teacher that was why they decided to beat her up.
	They're not even ashamed of it.
	They're not even trying to hide it.
	And we're seeing more and more of this.
	This tribalism out front, just like that Jewish screenwriter.
	We need to stop trying to make people better.
	We don't need to debate anything.
	We just need to shut you up and tell you to shut the F up, or we're going to beat you into submission.
	That's what the Muslims are doing as well.
	Oh, let's bring that in.
	Let's bring that into our country.
	Let's get as many people, both of those groups, into our country as we can, right?
	We've got billions of dollars to bring those people in.
	The next day, her daughter's bruises, including a black eye, appeared, and we immediately took a picture of it.
	When she came home that day, I just kind of looked her over.
	She had bruises on her arms, a bruise on her back, bruises all over her legs, she said.
	But the school district would not contact the police.
	So she did. And she contacted the news.
	They told her, her daughter, that if she hit them, or if she even touched them, that they would hurt themselves, and they would tell the teacher that she had hurt them.
	So the mother said, she just told me, you know, so all I could do was just lay there, Mom.
	I was informed, said the mother, on the camera footage, it showed them going up to her, punching her in the face, and her hitting back, and then she runs off and they run after her, then that's when all of them go off camera, and that's when the attack happens.
	And that's what the principal told me as well.
	She said this was just because of her race and her religion.
	Are we going to have, is Speaker Mike Johnson, is he going to put monitors on campus to monitor this kind of hatred?
	We don't even have a name for hatred of white people, do we?
	Well, yeah, we do. It's called CRT. It's called school.
	They have classes on it.
	They have classes on it K-12.
	They have classes on it in college.
	So the fact that because this was race and religion fuel, the fact that we were never suspended or expelled from school, they were never suspended or expelled from school, or redirected to distance learning instead of continuing to stay in the classroom, which two of them were in the same classroom as my daughter, she said, that's alarming regardless of their age.
	You know, they're nine years old, but they're as old as her daughter.
	So she said, if this had been Christian kids attacking a Muslim kid, it would be all over the national news.
	If it had been Christian kids attacking a Jewish kid, they would have been, I guess, shipped to Gaza, which is another idea that's been proposed by some of these GOP panderers.
	You know, it shouldn't be that way.
	Our children shouldn't even be in the media for stuff like this in the first place.
	The same outrage should be there for every child.
	Because no child should be attacked on a playground and made to feel unsafe at school because their attackers are still there.
	Well, the mother now knows that it's not okay to be white, even if you're nine years old in a government school.
	And so now it's on the mother who needs to take her kid out of that school, quite frankly.
	As Alex Newman has said many times, the school building is on fire.
	First thing you do is get your kid out of there.
	Then you try to put the fire out so it doesn't burn down the entire town.
	And that's what's going on with the schools.
	The schools are there to burn down the entire town.
	But they're going to kill your kid first.
	School has made a tremendous reversal on a prayer club.
	This was a school district where they had organizations like a pride club, a green club.
	You know, those religions are okay.
	The religion of LGBT, the religion of climate change, those are all okay.
	This was not even a Christian club, by the way.
	And this was two elementary school students proposed this.
	It was a prayer club, but it was interfaith.
	It wasn't even Christian.
	Just, you know, anybody who wants to pray.
	It could be Muslim, Jewish, Buddhist, whatever.
	I mean, you know, it's just a prayer club.
	But they were denied.
	Even though the district actively promoted more than a dozen non-religious clubs, including a pride club and the green team.
	But again, to say that those are not religions is to not understand what they're really about.
	They are religions. They have their own moral code, their own worldview.
	They have a moral code they want to hold you to as well.
	Just a short distance from the high school, this elementary school, the high school where Coach Joe Kennedy was fired for praying on the football field after each game.
	He won the right to pray on the football field in a 6-3 Supreme Court decision.
	But again, this is the same school district.
	they have a real problem with prayer and a real problem with religion.
	RFK Jr. made it very clear when he's talking about abortion that he's got a real problem with sparing the lives of babies. He said he was asked for clarification, another podcaster said, should there be a limit or are you saying all the way up to a full term a woman has a right to have an abortion? You know, this is a guy who, by the way, Why don't trust him?
	He has a website where he talks about vaccine damage and fluoride and other things like that that are bad, and he tells the truth about that.
	But he calls his site Children's Health Defense, and yet he won't defend children in the womb.
	Kennedy expressed skepticism that a mother would abort her child eight months or later without, quote, extenuating circumstances, unquote.
	Well, I can't believe anybody would do that.
	Well, you better believe it because they do it all the time.
	But he maintained that government should never have, quote, jurisdiction over people's bodies and that abortion should not be forbidden, quote, even if it is full term, unquote.
	So he's on record. He's made it clear that he would kill full-term babies.
	End of story.
	Bioethicists are speaking out against Iceland, aborting almost every baby that has Down syndrome.
	A nearly 100% abortion rate for babies with Down syndrome in Iceland.
	Nearly all pregnant women in Iceland undergo prenatal testing.
	And so an Icelandic bioethics experts are beginning to get concerned as they noticed that abortion is virtually always chosen.
	Well, you know, we were older when we had our child and we adopted Travis and then Karen found out she was one month pregnant.
	And they really pushed the amniocentesis thing on us, but we were like, well, you know, what would we do about it?
	I mean, you know, with any test, there's always a chance that there's harm.
	There's always a chance that there's going to be a false positive.
	And we weren't going to abort the baby even if it had Down syndrome.
	And then later on, we met a really good friend of Karen's who's now died from cancer before all the jab stuff happened.
	But she was pregnant and older, and they gave her the test, and she tested positive for Down syndrome.
	She had two children. They couldn't say for sure.
	I mean, you weren't sure whether it was even a false positive.
	But either way, did it affect both children?
	Because they were going to abort both of them.
	She did not have the abortion.
	She was a Christian. She had a sister who was not a Christian, and her sister got so angry with her that she didn't abort the baby.
	One of the babies had Down syndrome.
	The other one was normal and had no health issues whatsoever.
	But her sister was so angry with her that she went ahead and had a baby, and it turned out to have Down syndrome.
	But she never spoke to her again, ever.
	That's how angry her sister was.
	And, you know, we watched her, you know, the child with Down syndrome, very difficult at times, but also a lot of joy to them as well.
	Is that any different in that regard than any other child?
	Quite frankly...
	I've known people who have put their perfectly normal, healthy children into government school who've had a lot more grief and heartache and problems than the people that I've known that have had children with Down syndrome.
	What they do to the child, and that child that comes after you, this rebellious child that's been ruined by the government school is a far worse situation.
	The child who has Down syndrome.
	But they're essentially aborting every child in Iceland, screening for it very carefully.
	It's kind of a eugenics program, isn't it?
	Biden, by the way, wants to put these nine pro-life advocates in prison for 11 years.
	He's gotten convictions, and it's today.
	By the way, Travis, look this up.
	Look up this name, Lauren Handy.
	L-A-U-R-E-N Handy.
	This would be the first sentence that was supposed to be handed down today at 9 a.m.
	by the judge. And the second one was supposed to be handed down at 10.30 a.m., and that was an hour ago, so if you can find that.
	Five years in prison.
	Wow. Scroll down.
	Let me see her age. Lauren Handy.
	I don't know if they have her name there.
	What did she do that was such a crime, right?
	You've got the Biden administration that is letting in and letting loose known rapists, pedophiles, all the rest of the stuff.
	But if somebody stands too close to an abortion center and tries to tell people not to have an abortion, they give them five years in jail.
	Biden wanted her in jail for 11 years.
	Look up this name. John Henshaw.
	H-I-N-S-H-A-W. He was sentenced about an hour ago, so it should be in the news there with that as well.
	Handy, who got five years, is a Catholic, a well-known pro-life person, and she is going to jail for five years.
	And as all this stuff is happening, suddenly there just aren't enough babies in the world, says the Wall Street Journal.
	I wonder why that's happening.
	The world is at a startling demographic milestone.
	Sometime soon, the global fertility rate will drop below the point needed to keep population constant, and it may have happened already.
	Well, it's not like it's a surprise, is it?
	I mean, we had the Deagle Report.
	We've had the Georgia Guidestones.
	They've been saying that's their goal is depopulation.
	Since the 1960s, Paul Ehrlich and the other people who founded this climate alarmism, that was always a solution.
	Too many people. Yeah, they want to take away the cars.
	They want to take away electricity.
	They want to take away our food, our meat, our dairy, everything.
	But mainly they want to take us away.
	They hate people. We are a virus, as I pointed out on the Gaia theory.
	Mother Earth is a sentient thing, and we are a virus.
	Did you find that person? Any news about them?
	So, fertility has fallen.
	It looks like they convicted all of them, and they're mostly focusing the headlines on Lauren Handy, but everyone else is convicted as well.
	Well, they were all convicted months ago.
	It's just that this morning they were going to be handing out the sentences.
	Everyone's only talking about the sentencing of Lauren Handy.
	I imagine maybe they just gave a blanket five years to everyone.
	Yeah, maybe. Yeah, that's the same judge going to decide what the sentence is of everybody.
	It's just amazing. Just amazing.
	It's amazing to me that the Republicans would not repeal the FACE Act.
	Isn't that interesting? Why not?
	Well, we've got a war to run.
	You know, Mike Johnson is our wartime speaker, as he called himself.
	He's too busy killing people in Ukraine and the Middle East, trying to start a war with China and Russia.
	He's too busy doing that to take a look at the slaughter here in America, or this kind of political persecution, this kind of religious persecution as well.
	He doesn't have any concern about free speech either.
	As a matter of fact, he's got all kinds of things, speech that he wants to suppress for his political donors.
	Fertility is falling almost everywhere for women across all levels of income, education, and labor force participation.
	All demographics.
	The falling birth rates come with huge implications for the way people live, how economies grow, and the standings of the world's superpowers.
	And again, it's social, it's environmental, it's vaccination, all the rest of the stuff.
	The demographic winter is coming, said an economist who specializes in demographics at the University of Pennsylvania.
	Many government leaders see this as a matter of national urgency.
	Therefore, we have open borders to bring the migrants in who can fill in the gap until the robots are ready to take over for the migrants.
	And then the migrants can fight us off and we can all fight over the fact that we got nothing to eat.
	That's the plan, folks.
	Just amazing to watch this roll out.
	China reported 9 million births last year, 16% less than projected.
	In the U.S., 4% less than projected.
	Egypt, 17% less.
	Kenya, 18% less.
	Is that the shot?
	Again, you know, the only one, as I mentioned, the only one that is going up is Israel.
	Pretty much everybody else is going down.
	And when you look at it, you know, they have abortion available and all these other things.
	And you even had Netanyahu put his people at the front of the line saying, I'll give you reports for two years.
	I mean, did they not vaccinate?
	I think they did vaccinate them.
	I think they did get the real stuff.
	Maybe they didn't send them the real stuff.
	Maybe. I don't know. It is strange, isn't it?
	There's other factors besides vaccination, though, that are responsible for this.
	Erica Pittman, a 45-year-old business banker in Raleigh, North Carolina, said she and her husband opted to have only one child because of demands on their time, including caring for her mother who died last year after a long battle with multiple sclerosis.
	Their 8-year-old son is able to participate in theater workshops, soccer and summer camps because the couple, with a combined income of almost $225,000 a year, has more time and money.
	Be careful what you ask for.
	One of the things that we saw in China with one-child policy was what they call the little emperor syndrome.
	They would have one child or they would pay a severe penalty.
	If you didn't have a really high-paying job, that penalty could be over a year's income that they would penalize you for.
	That's one of the reasons why they had so many little girls that were put up for adoption.
	They would keep the boys because they thought the boys were going to make more money or whatever, take care of them in their old age, and the girls would not.
	And so you had so many of these families that had one boy, like this family of the bankers.
	And, um, these kids, they called them little emperors because they were spoiled brats and the parents were afraid of them.
	And we saw this on our trip to China, especially on the plane, one of them.
	Oh, the way he controlled his mother was unbelievable.
	This kid was like eight or nine and his mother was afraid of him.
	Oh, don't do this.
	And he's throwing temper tantrum and all this kind of stuff.
	She was afraid to do anything about it.
	And, um, I think he needs to go to the restroom.
	Come on, let's go to the restroom, you know?
	Never mind what you hear in a moment here.
	But, you know, it was unbelievable.
	Travis was there and, you know, we're all looking at each other like, what is going on?
	But we saw that happen several times while we were in China.
	And so, by the way, as we look at the five-year sentence handed down to one of these pro-lifers, another one who has been jailed and is not on the list to be sentenced today, Louis Nufke was the reporter for LifeSite News, and he was interviewing Heather Adani, who's 59 years old.
	He was interviewing her, and he was so shocked that he called 911.
	To get her help.
	Because she was having heart issues, needed heart medication, and they were not giving it to her.
	You know, we look at these political prisoners.
	These are the people who are getting it really bad.
	Not Trump. Trump hasn't gone to jail.
	Trump hasn't had anything happen to him.
	Oh, they're going to take his property.
	Well, maybe they will, but they haven't taken it yet.
	It's much worse than what's happening to Trump.
	Biden wants to destroy all of his political dissidents, all of his opponents, especially the small ones.
	I think he's probably going to give preferential treatment to Trump because it's really about having the show trial happen.
	To trash his character further for people.
	But anything that he does to Trump is kind of setting a precedent that might come back to haunt him and other politicians.
	And so I think he's going to withdraw.
	He's not going to give Trump the kind of treatment, I believe.
	We'll see, but I really don't believe.
	That even if Trump is found guilty, they're going to do anything to him.
	But these people, the pro-life people, the January 6th people, the little guys, oh, Biden will crush any dissidents, anybody that's on the other side from him.
	So, Heather Adani, 59 years old, she had three stents put above her heart two weeks before this reporter was talking to her.
	She had to take daily doses of heart medication.
	However, the prison hadn't given her a single dose, she told the LifeSite News reporter.
	And then D.C. jail personnel have told her that their records say she's been given them every day, but the people who were there are punishing her.
	And so as she was doing the interview, she started having AFib, fluttering of the heart.
	She stopped the interview, saying she would request a trip to the hospital.
	But the reporter for LifeSite News, Nufki, then called her lawyer and then called 911 for an emergency dispatch.
	He said, I ended up calling 911 to get a dispatch sent to the jail to make sure they didn't ignore her.
	Her lawyer said that if the doctor declares her condition was due to negligence in medical care, the marshals of the jail would be civilly liable.
	Very much like this other elderly pro-lifer who was brought into court, shackled at the wrist, shackled at the ankles, shackled at the waist, like she was some kind of fugitive risk.
	And the judge said, get those shackles off.
	And the marshal was indignant.
	And the judge insisted, and all he did was to take it off of her wrist.
	That was it. They really want to punish these people.
	That should concern all of us.
	How vindictive and how personally vindictive the people in this so-called justice system are here in America.
	So she is facing up to 10 years in prison.
	Her sentencing date is set for May the 21st.
	So she's another week away for hers.
	Just to remind everybody that you can find the Roku channel, perhaps, by searching for David Knight Show on Roku app or by searching in your search engine for it.
	We may still be there.
	If we are, please give us a five-star rating.
	Because even if we get pulled down by Vimeo, we may get back on Roku at a later date.
	Also, wherever you're watching the broadcast, whether you're watching it live or recorded, please remind people to watch it, like the stream, talk about it on social media.
	We really would appreciate that.
	And let me also mention Trends Journal.
	Gerald Slenty, he'll be joining us this Friday.
	You can save 10% off of Trends Journal with the promo code NIGHT, K9GHT. So make sure you take a look at his free trends journal.
	It's an amazing publication. He does it on a weekly basis now.
	It's all online, but it's all linked.
	It's a great production, and he is way ahead of the curve on what is happening with economics and, unfortunately, with war, it appears.
	On Rumble, PlasmaStream, thank you for the tip.
	Five minutes ago, my four-year-old nephew...
	Told me that I shouldn't be using my coffee beans because it's bad for the environment.
	Said his teacher told him when I asked.
	And they're in his head already, says PlasmaStream.
	Yeah, that's what it's about.
	We don't want Johnny and Susie learning to read or to do math.
	We've got a political agenda.
	We've got to hammer into them on a regular basis.
	On Rumble, Jeb Stewart.
	Oh, good to see you riding in here.
	Well, Joe Rogan is a modern-day Timothy Leary.
	That's right, yeah. And his band of merry deceivers?
	What were they? I don't know.
	Yeah, the guy who, you know, CIA starts the LSD program.
	And Timothy Leary and Ken Kesey, you know, take it on a tour.
	You know, the magical psychedelic bus and everything.
	Everybody should take this stuff.
	Yeah. DGB. DG8. I'm sorry.
	Thank you for the tips. David, they discriminate against whites in New York while Congress protects a certain group.
	Disgusting. Notice that Congress drags its feet on illegal immigration.
	Absolutely. Yeah.
	From the time that Johnson took over as Speaker, what was it, October or something?
	All the way up until one or two weeks before they passed the bill.
	He was saying, well...
	We'll give money to Ukraine, which he had always opposed.
	As a congressman, he'd opposed money for Ukraine.
	We'll do Ukraine, but you're going to have to do something at the border at the same time.
	And they just threw the border out.
	Notice that they drag their feet on illegal immigration, but they protest a certain group on campus, and within a week, they're passing legislation.
	That's right. If they want to do something, they know how to get it done, don't they?
	Especially with this guy.
	He uses the Pelosi rule, which is saying, we're not going to let you know what's in it.
	You're going to pass it and then find out what's in it.
	And you'll pass it because I say to pass it.
	And he wants to change it even more so.
	He wants to get rid of any of the pullback that happened with McCarthy.
	Remember, we had the conservatives who went to McCarthy and said, you're going to have to agree to certain things to get our support.
	You have to agree that you're going to give us more time to look at these bills.
	You're going to have to have at least 72 hours to look at these bills.
	You're going to stop these omnibus bills.
	We put everything together, the whole kitchen sink and pass everything or nothing at all.
	You're going to have to stop that.
	You're going to have to let us be able to have input from the floor.
	Instead, you know, Pelosi had done everything from committee, behind closed doors, and all the rest of the stuff.
	And now, this is what Mike Johnson says he's going to do.
	He is a traitor, if ever there was one.
	Rock fan. Eric, thank you for the tip.
	I appreciate that. And SoloCat1980 writes, public school is a brainwashing prison.
	Why be surprised that physical abuse happens in addition to mental abuse?
	That's right. And ACSAB, thank you for the tip on Rumble.
	I appreciate that. Yeah, even in the UK, of course, it's not any different.
	The left is showing that it will no longer tolerate Christianity.
	Christians are now the most despised minority in Britain, says Tom Harris in The Telegraph, with the left particularly showing itself unable to tolerate any Christian who actually believes the teachings of his or her faith, an animus that is oddly missing where Islam is concerned.
	Liberal Democrats, for example, you had a formal complaint Over local activist decision to remove David Campanale as a parliamentary candidate.
	His crime? He's a Christian.
	Even worse, he is a Christian who actually believes in biblical teaching, which is an unforgivable sin for the liberal Democrats.
	That's the name of their party. We have liberal Democrats here, but that's the name of their party.
	And he's not the first one to have suffered from the hands of illiberal members of the Liberal Party.
	In 2019, former Labor MP Rob Flello was chosen as a Lib Dem candidate for its parliamentary candidate for Stoke-on-Trent South, which he had represented as a Labor MP between 2005 and 2017.
	Within 36 hours, he was deselected, his socially conservative views as a committed Roman Catholic having come to light.
	Oh, sorry. You're out of here.
	Tim Farron, who made it all the way to the leadership of the Lib Dems, was hounded by the media and resigned shortly after polling day because he was an evangelical Christian.
	In Scotland, the Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes has been criticized by many, including newspaper columnists and Scottish National Party activists, for belonging to the Free Presbyterian Church.
	As with Campanale, Flello, and Farron, Forbes' crime is not in being a Christian per se, but in being an evangelical Christian and publicly stating that she accepts biblical teaching.
	Religious intolerance is not equally applied across the left, however.
	When Moten Ali won a council seat in Leeds as a Green Party candidate, he shouted, Allahu Akbar.
	And he proclaimed his victory to be, quote, a win for the people of Gaza.
	Yeah, that's what Rashida Tlaib did, right?
	And she got in. It's like, so you're here as the congressional representative for Palestine?
	Go home. Go home.
	Then described critics of this outburst as Islamophobic.
	It later emerged that he had claimed that Israel had control of the mainstream media, had recorded himself chanting from the river to sea at a pro-Gaza rally.
	Nobody suggested that Islam's condemnation of homosexuality should prevent him from representing the most left-wing progressive party in the country.
	As a matter of fact, the difference is, That in Islam, they don't say, as the Christians do, well, you know, this is a sin.
	But God forgives sin.
	You know, just turn from this, and there is forgiveness.
	Instead, what they do is they throw the homosexuals off the roof or kill them in some other way.
	I don't know. I guess we're the bad guys here, right?
	Muslim candidates, elected representatives need to make no excuses for their personal faith, especially not with the most progressive party.
	And then in Belgium, This is how society has denigrated.
	Belgium government now will negotiate with prostitutes who refuse sex.
	Passed earlier this month, the law allows prostitutes to obtain employment contracts from their pimps.
	Why didn't Andrew Tate go there instead of to Romania?
	He could have been walking the streets still, I guess.
	These contracts classify prostitutes as hospitality employees.
	Hospitality employees!
	And entitles them to health insurance, pensions, unemployment benefits, holidays, and maternity leave.
	Pimps must be licensed by the government.
	However, if a prostitute refuses or stops sex more than ten times over six months, their pimp can open a labor dispute and involve a government mediator who tells them they must comply, I guess.
	Belgium decriminalized sex work in 2022.
	Didn't take long to get to this point, did it, right?
	You go from against it to neutral and then very rapidly for it, pushing it, right?
	They decriminalized prostitution in 2022, allowing prostitutes to work as freelancers.
	However, employing a sex worker under contract remained a criminal offense, meaning that agreements between pimps and prostitutes existed in a legal gray area and contained no legally binding protections for the prostitute.
	Now, a trade union for prostitutes in Belgium hails the new law and hopes that it spreads to other nations.
	They said, we hope that other countries will copy this as they did on other topics such as same-sex marriage, abortion, euthanasia, and transgender rights.
	Oh, you better believe they will.
	You better believe they will.
	Our politicians are prostitutes themselves and Hang out with prostitutes.
	I'm sure they would like to do that and make it, you know, take away the age limitations as well.
	Alan Dershowitz has been very public about that.
	The guy who was one of the lawyers defending Jeffrey Epstein.
	Pimps see women as they sell as products that Not as people deserving full dignity and respect, said one person on social media, Andrea Hines.
	Strange how that happens when you commodify yourself, isn't it?
	Yeah, that's right. Yeah, this is trafficking on one aspect of it, but quite frankly, I don't know that legalizing it is really going to help the trafficking stuff at all either.
	But notice how this article from RT even kind of normalizes it, right?
	Someone to mediate a pimp victim contract is what government has become, a government mediator.
	To gently encourage women to get back into the brothel bed when they're not fulfilling their sexual obligations.
	This is what government has become, folks.
	It truly is.
	Brave new world.
	Crazy stuff, too. Again, you know, I talked about it the other day, furries.
	The one thing to point out about this, how it has spread, in 2023, the two largest furry conventions attracted 13,644 people and 15,547 attendees.
	So 13,500, 15,500 attendees.
	And they have a dating app for furries that has over 45,000 members.
	So, are they harmless?
	Asked World. They said a survey in 2019 of 334 male furries, 99% said their motivation was at least partly sexual.
	The UK-based Safer Schools ecosystem warns that child predators could mask their identity as a furry to prey on kids.
	Middle schoolers who act like cats may just be goofing off.
	But the parents should beware the deeper hazards, says World Magazine.
	And of course, yeah, just the school that accepts something like that.
	And then there's this.
	The drag clown pastor.
	Take a look at this guy.
	You know, Peter had to be vulnerable.
	He had to be vulnerable, first of all, to remember that he had already denied Jesus.
	Can you believe this? And Jesus is like, you love me.
	What kind of a world are we in?
	Broken and vulnerable. Human nature is broken.
	As a queer person, as a drag performer, my friends that are trans people that are performers, they were broken.
	The church broke them.
	Families broke them. Society, political agendas have broken them and have torn them down and caused so much pain and heartache.
	They're victims. They've been broken.
	The church broke them. Families broke them.
	Political agendas broke them.
	Society broke them.
	And then he continues on to say that you may love someone who may be the same gender or that you may not even love someone.
	It's a hard thing. I can tell you that.
	That brokenness, that vulnerability can create some amazing things.
	So he goes on to say that, you know, the fact that the transgenders and the drag queens and everything are not accepted by everybody, it actually makes them better Christians.
	Did you know that? I guess, you know, as the Bible says, in a lot of days people become lovers of self.
	Jesus said, why do you call me Lord, Lord, and you don't do what I say?
	These people are not broken in sorrow over their disobedience.
	And she refers to Peter.
	It was Peter who said that those who believe in Christ, they see Christ as the precious stone, the stone that the builders rejected, has become the chief cornerstone, a stone of stumbling, a rock of offense.
	They stumble by being disobedient.
	And everyone who stumbles on that stone will be broken to pieces.
	And it will crush anyone it falls upon.
	That's the brokenness about it.
	Yeah, you need to be broken. You need to be broken and regretful and sorrow over your disobedience and the consequences, the potential consequences of that.
	You need to be sorrowful enough to stop it.
	Because there's grace and forgiveness for those who do.
	But for those who are not broken over that sin, they'll be crushed by that rock.
	That's the Christian message.
	It's one of, you may be broken, but you can accept His forgiveness while there is time, while you have the opportunity.
	It's just amazing to me to see this exhibition put on in a church.
	But this is also amazing to me.
	Logos Software, which is a Bible software platform, and they have people evidently can sign up and list books, and evidently it's such a big thing that they don't have any vetting process.
	They have hundreds of erotic books on Logos Bible Software site, like this, The Stripper's Guide to Looking Great Naked.
	Yeah. We're good to go.
	Yeah, exactly. One of the swords followers and stuff like that.
	What's going on here? Is this like some bizarro?
	We have done the time warp or something.
	Am I dreaming? Pinch me so I can wake up here.
	But I had books on witchcraft and stuff like that as well as on the Logos thing.
	And so this had been pointed out to them before.
	And they said they didn't update about a month after it was pointed out once before.
	So we've checked, tested, verified our own filters as well as our manual processes are working properly.
	And now you still have this kind of stuff there.
	Here's the thing, right?
	We need to all understand that this is a spiritual war.
	Now, these people may honestly be doing their best, maybe, or sloppy job of this.
	They may not really know what is going on.
	But let me tell you, this is not a mistake by Satan.
	He knows exactly where to go to hawk his stuff, to do his temptation.
	It's always going to be there.
	And it's always going to be there for the people who are in a position of leadership.
	And that's true whether the people are somebody that's a pastor or teacher who's going to Logos to get some Bible software.
	That's the kind of people that Satan is going to attack.
	If it's the head of a household...
	Satan is going to go there.
	You strike the shepherd down, you scatter the sheep.
	It always happens from the top down.
	People wonder, how did all of our institutions get taken over from the top down?
	That's because it's the spiritual war.
	Thank you for joining us. Have a good day.
	Let me tell you the David Knight show you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	Ha ha ha! And you want to know something else?
	You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at thedavidnightshow.com.

▲