Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 13, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:16

The David Knight Show - 05/13/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds
	you're listening to the David night show as the clock strikes 13 it's Monday, the 13th of May, year of our Lord, 2024.
	Well, today we're going to talk about food, and perhaps we should start spelling it P-H instead of F, because this is the FDA, pharmaceutical industry, taking over food.
	We have a combined MacGuffin.
	If you can believe it, we've got a company that is coming out with a vaccine for cows to keep them from farting.
	It is the perfect scam, combining these MacGuffins together.
	But there's another scam that is incredibly dangerous as well.
	And that is the insurance company scam.
	There was another hidden hand behind the murder for cash that they called a pandemic.
	And we're going to take a look at this.
	Yet another indication that insurance companies were bribing doctors and blackmailing doctors financially to vaccinate their patients.
	We'll be right back. Yeah, it never stops. They're going to come after the food.
	They're going to come after the food.
	You can see the contours of this plan already.
	And we know what their long-term goals are.
	The contours are going to be, we're going to shut down local food production.
	We're going to concentrate it even more so into the big agricultural firms, which, by the way...
	Do all this stuff anyway.
	They're polluting the environment. They're polluting the food.
	They want to be able to vaccinate us through the animals because people caught on what this stuff is.
	And so they've got another hidden hand to do this.
	And so they want to have control over our food supply.
	That gives them total control over us.
	They want to be able to vaccinate us through our food as well as shut down local food production.
	And to be able to pull this pandemic scare at any whim that they've got.
	So this is a Boston-based startup.
	A new company. Now, if you wanted a new company that was going to be able to raise a lot of money, what better way than to say, I've got a vaccine to stop climate change.
	It combines all the MacGuffins.
	You've got the pandemic MacGuffin.
	You've got the pharmaceutical company on your side.
	You've got Big Ag on your side.
	And so, yeah, we got a vaccine for cow farts, literally.
	I couldn't believe it when I saw this sent to me by Liz.
	I'm sorry, I appreciate this.
	I think it was sent by Sam, but I can't remember and I forgot to write it down.
	A drug for cows could curb methane emissions from meat and dairy.
	This is an article from Bloomberg, but it's covered by several different places because, as I found out, this article was behind a paywall.
	But I was able to find Axios and many others that cover this.
	And I was actually able to find out the name of the company and actually go to their website.
	Travis, pull that up so people can see what that looks like.
	That's the second link on there.
	The methane emitted by burping cows.
	I put it politely. It's not the burps that they're so worried about.
	Burping cows, sheep, goats, and other livestock.
	Does more short-term damage to the climate than the world's passenger vehicles by some estimates.
	Ag biotech company Arkea Bio says its drug targets methane-producing microorganisms that live in animals' saliva and digestive tracts.
	A vaccine against climate change.
	This checks all the boxes, doesn't it?
	So, you know, definitely go down and collect your check then.
	And they were able to go down and collect...
	26.5 million dollars.
	They're a startup. They don't have a product yet, but boy, they sure do have a narrative, don't they?
	This is what they say on their website.
	Pull it up, Arkea Biolabs, Travis.
	A second link on there. When it comes to climate change, a simple vaccine can be a powerful tool.
	Actually, I got a link to the actual website there.
	Arkea Bio, their website.
	This is a biotech startup.
	They describe themselves as developing a safe.
	Always a safe, isn't it?
	It's always so safe.
	This kind of reminds me of...
	The marathon man, you know, this guy's jogging and it's been a long time since I've seen it.
	I just remember the, is it safe?
	Is it safe? I don't know. Is it safe?
	He gets kidnapped.
	Dustin Hoffman gets kidnapped by Lawrence Olivier.
	He's playing this mad Nazi scientist in hiding and he starts pulling his teeth out to get him to talk.
	That's a hard thing to do.
	I guess he didn't give him the anesthesia because he'd be talking about this, you know.
	So he just started pulling his teeth out and he keeps asking him, is it safe?
	He has no idea what's going on with this stuff.
	I got the wrong guy. Just keeps pulling his teeth out.
	Well, that's what I think of when I see these vaccines.
	Is it safe yet? No, it's not safe.
	You're killing people. Literally killing people.
	And we'll talk about that with insurance companies.
	But they describe their vaccine that they haven't developed yet.
	They are two and a half years from releasing it.
	How do they know that it's safe?
	How do they know that it's user-friendly?
	User-friendly? What does that even mean with a vaccine?
	It's safe. It's user-friendly, I guess, because you are going to be the end user.
	And you won't even know that you're getting the mRNA stuff, right?
	So it's user-friendly.
	Hidden. Hidden, in other words.
	But how do they know that it's safe?
	How do they know that it's effective?
	They haven't even done their tests on it yet.
	Well, all they have to do is pay off the right people and that corrupt organization that we call the FDA that shouldn't exist.
	But, of course, Congress pretends not to notice.
	They pretended not to notice when people were dying.
	They pretend not to notice about any of this stuff.
	And they pretend that it never happened.
	And we've got to understand that it did.
	The vaccine to reduce methane emissions from ruminants.
	It will work seamlessly with existing global agribusiness practices, they say.
	And also on their website.
	Go ahead and pull that up. They say methane has a global warming potential of around 28 times higher than CO2, with the predominant impact occurring over the next 10 years.
	How do they know that? How do they know that?
	It's going to be really big, but it's going to be right now.
	Right now. Because, you know, over the next 10 years, we've got to get this new Great Reset in.
	Got to have a new society by 2030.
	So, rush it out.
	These methane emissions account for more GHGs than all passenger and airline vehicle producing emissions.
	Yeah, we've got to kill your food, you see.
	It's not just about killing our freedom of travel with cars and our mobility with cars and our travel with planes.
	It's not just about that.
	It's about killing your food supply.
	They want to kill our energy supply.
	They want to take down the electric grid.
	They're already in the process. They've been in the process of disassembling it under these lies about renewable energy and banning and taking down coal power plants while China is allowed to put up as many as dirty, unfiltered power plants as they wish without any restriction.
	No, nothing to see here, right?
	This isn't any kind of scam here, is it?
	It's not a great reset.
	It's not a great taking. It's not any of that stuff.
	Oh, no. But by the way, we want to put all of your stuff on the electric grid that we're taking down.
	And so this company, Arkea Bio, raises $26.5 million for their climate vaccine.
	Just amazing.
	Amazing insanity that we have.
	Everything's got to be a vaccine, doesn't it?
	There's no better way to make money or to kill people, which is what their fundamental agenda is.
	Their fundamental agenda is mass murder.
	I've been talking about this for a very long time.
	This is how it works. We knew for the longest time that was their agenda.
	We knew for the longest time their agenda was to take everything from us and to pack us into open-air prisons that they call smart cities and stuff like that.
	But we knew that even before they started calling them smart cities.
	But now we're seeing more and more details, and now we're seeing the contours of how they do it, how they wish to do it.
	So how are we going to stop this?
	We're going to stop it locally.
	It's not going to be stopped at the state level.
	It certainly isn't going to be stopped at the federal level.
	The federal level is completely owned by these people and will be an ally with them against us.
	The federal government, both parties, both presidential candidates are allies of the globalists, and they will partner with them to make this stuff come through.
	You know, I look at the Democrats who are getting worried because their cases are falling through.
	Bill Maher said...
	Well, you know, he went through the different cases and he said, well, this isn't going to happen because he's got a MAGA-friendly judge and she's going to delay this trial.
	And then this other one isn't going to happen because we've got a corrupt prosecutor, Fannie Willis, and this other one doesn't look too good either.
	We've got Stormy Daniels and Michael Cohen, not really two credible witnesses.
	By the way, there doesn't seem to be a crime at the center of this.
	Immoral, yes, but this is a reality TV show.
	This is more about a smear than about anything else.
	And so he says, I don't think this isn't working.
	James Carville's getting really upset as well.
	We even have the Federal Reserve saying, well, I don't think we're going to drop interest rates.
	They may not. Who knows?
	They may not drop interest rates to boost Biden.
	Maybe they want Trump in.
	Because if you stop and think about it, this is what I was saying in 2020.
	I said, if you...
	I said, you know what the difference is between Trump and Biden?
	It isn't the election corruption.
	It isn't even the vaccine and pandemic stuff.
	They're both going to do the same thing with all that stuff.
	They'll roll it out and present it differently.
	And different demographic groups will join in there with them.
	You know, we stop and think about it.
	If it was Trump there, right?
	He would start...
	Twisting arms of corporations, which is what the mandate, the coercion that Biden did was.
	He mandated it directly for the military, for example, but Trump had already done that order.
	He already had that in there to take effect when they had vaccine development at a certain state, when it got to the full approval, which is what Biden did.
	So Trump already had that in there.
	But the rest of the stuff we'd already seen being done by Republicans, even Governor DeWine in Ohio, financially incentivizing this stuff, you know, creating different things like the Republican governor of Ohio did that along with Ramaswamy.
	Nobody ever asked Ramaswamy, what did you do on the COVID team of DeWine?
	What were you doing there? Well, some of us know that he was working on trying to make another fortune out of contact surveillance and tracking and things like that.
	But he should have been grilled on that, but he didn't get grilled on that.
	He's really up for facing the tough questions.
	He didn't want to come on this show, though.
	Anyway, not that I could have done better than that.
	I mean, he really is a slippery character.
	I don't know that I could have nailed him down, but he didn't want to come on and have those questions asked.
	Nevertheless, when we look at what Governor Little did in Idaho, you know, he shuts down the legislatures.
	Hey, wait a minute, wait a minute. They were not meeting that year.
	They meet every other year.
	They were going to call a special session and shut down all this lockdown stuff that the governor was doing, that he'd been paid several times, what the entire state budget was, several times the state's entire budget was given to that governor by Trump, this is what he did in every state, to be used by that governor at his discretion.
	An amazing amount of political capital.
	Political capital.
	Which was also given to governors like Cuomo and nuisance in California.
	You know, they all got that as well.
	But he shut it down.
	He said, no, you're not going to meet. And then he put through some new rules and then called them back and told them to meet.
	I mean, these people are nothing but dictators.
	It doesn't matter if they're Republican or Democrat.
	And he said, okay, you put these things up here and you tell everybody you've got to wear masks.
	All of our, you know, Simon Says rules that make no difference.
	All these little rituals that they had everybody doing.
	You do that as a business.
	And if somebody gets sick, We will indemnify you.
	We'll protect you from lawsuits.
	But if you don't put up all the signs, and you don't enforce all of our little Mickey Mouse, Simon Says rules, then you just might get sued, and you just might have your entire business taken away that way.
	So you should comply with all this.
	That was the Republican governor's approach, and the Republican legislature in Idaho just rubber-stamped it when they came back in.
	So getting back to the vaccine for cow farts.
	Boston, of course, Boston.
	Corruption Central.
	Boston, Massachusetts.
	Harvard, right? The Children's Hospital there that got Gottesfeld.
	Just amazing.
	Archea Bio, a leading biotech startup.
	Now, how is it a leading startup?
	Does that mean they raised a lot of money?
	26 million? They haven't done anything.
	How can they be a leading startup?
	What are they leading in?
	They're leading in cash?
	This article here from Yahoo Finance.
	Archeo's bios vaccine will provide an innovative, cost-effective, scalable solution to reduce the world's livestock methane emissions, which currently generate the equivalent of 3 billion tons of CO2 annually and represent 6% of the annual greenhouse gas emissions.
	Isn't that amazing? Talk about this little gas as if it's tons, right?
	All of the CO2 is 0.4%, I think.
	Isn't that right? Or is it 0.04%?
	And it's a minuscule amount.
	All the man-made stuff is an even smaller amount than that.
	And so they want to make this sound like it's 3 billion tons annually of greenhouse gas.
	What they want to do is they want to reduce the food production.
	They want to increase food costs.
	And most importantly, they want to poison us with their vaccines and our food.
	That's the goal of these people.
	And so, when you look at this, and their whole thing about, oh, it never ends, and it's just like this bird flu thing.
	Just like it. Where they say, well, we've got this bird flu.
	Nothing's happening. We don't have an epidemic of birds dying.
	The government is killing birds if they get a positive PCR. We'll call it a process, as one of the listeners said.
	Steve Swine said, don't call it a test.
	That legitimizes it. And it's not legitimate at all.
	I'll play the Carey Mullis thing over and over again.
	Should I play it again? I'll give him a break today.
	I'll give you a break today. I won't play it again today.
	I want you to memorize this thing, what Carey Mullis says.
	But it is a process.
	He said you can find anything anywhere, especially if you multiply it by a trillion times.
	They won't say anywhere where their PCR tests are.
	So they're after our food supply.
	Here's another example of how they're after our food supply.
	A rice problem.
	Rice has a methane problem.
	See, you thought they were going to stop at the meat and dairy stuff?
	Oh, no. No, rice has got a problem as well.
	Now, the bugs that will eat the rice and stuff, they don't have a problem.
	Isn't that interesting? Isn't that interesting?
	I guess, you know, we'll have to wait until Gates and these other people find some way to rip us off and poison us with rice before they will legitimize it.
	A startup, RISE, is providing incentives for farmers that can help curtail emissions of a powerful planet warming gas.
	This is a powerful food supply.
	Rice. Great deal of the world depends on rice to eat.
	And so they want to take that down as well.
	It's not just your meat and dairy.
	It's all of our food.
	This is a plan to starve us.
	These people see us As a virus.
	And we'll talk about that. We're going to talk about Eurovision.
	I call it the Euro trash contest because it's nothing but trash.
	Absolute trash. I mean, I looked at one video after the other and it's just shake my head.
	What has the culture come to us?
	No wonder God is judging us.
	Just unbelievable trash.
	So the Euro Trash Contest, when you look at it, one of them was this self-pronouncing Wiccan, gender-confused thing.
	Jeez, it just never stops.
	And all this paganism, what they're selling with the LGBT stuff.
	All this paganism, this Wicca stuff, and all the rest of it, really neatly folds into the paganism that is at the essence of the climate change stuff, the Gaia theory, Mother Earth, and all the rest of this stuff.
	It all fits.
	But they see us as a virus on planet Earth.
	We must be eliminated.
	So, reduce our food supply.
	Meat, dairy, rice now.
	Oh, methane, methane.
	Yeah, these are the gases of life.
	Enteric methane emissions are responsible for around 10% of global warming, says this company.
	A methane vaccine for ruminant animals is internationally recognized as the holy grail to deliver methane reduction at low cost and mass scale.
	Well, I think we need to come up with a way to defend this.
	Perhaps we could go all the way back to one of the Founding Fathers, Benjamin Franklin.
	Fart proudly. And we don't have to do that today or have the Chick-fil-A cows holding a sign up.
	Fart proudly. This is Axios.
	Startup raises $26.5 million for a vaccine to stop cow farts and burps.
	Why it matters.
	Caring about cow farts or burps has become a political punchline.
	But they're estimated to create more than 5% of global greenhouse gases.
	You see, they can't even keep the same percentage.
	They're making this stuff up, folks.
	It's not a problem.
	CO2 is wonderful.
	Actually, so is methane, unless you smell it here.
	The vaccines could be a relatively low-cost, scalable solution.
	Oh, yeah? Relatively low-cost.
	So you add the cost of a vaccine there, and you make sure, because the USDA is setting up the mechanism based on this false bird flu narrative, They're setting up the mechanism to tag and track all the cattle.
	Have they had all their vaccines?
	Have they had their COVID shots?
	Have they had their bird flu shots?
	Have they had their methane fart shots?
	If they didn't, well, you're going to have to put them down.
	You can't transport them to the centralized processing facility that we control.
	Unless they've had all their vaccines.
	Oh, and you can't have cattle on your local farm.
	We don't like that. You know, we got to shut you down for the big agricultural firms.
	That's where this is headed.
	It's not rocket science to figure this stuff out.
	The bottom line, the whole thing feels a little dystopian, says Axios.
	Axios is saying this.
	Axios says it feels a little dystopian.
	It feels a lot dystopian to me.
	Feels totally dystopian.
	It feels totalitarian dystopian.
	Giving animals injections so they can cook the planet a little less before we cook some of them.
	Oh, that's their problem with it.
	They just want to kill all the cows.
	Let's not bother to inject.
	Let's just kill them. Well, maybe they will with a vaccine.
	But agribusiness sailed over the dystopian hurdle long ago.
	So Axios is left-wing rag propaganda piece.
	Oh yeah, what's dystopian is the fact that we would cook and eat animals.
	So, as all this is happening, and as they want to give these people carte blanche to vaccinate cows for anything and everything, you have two farmers arrested by Pennsylvanian authorities and given 30-day sentences.
	No trial, no option for bail, nothing.
	They found them in contempt.
	They targeted these two guys.
	This is from Gateway Pundit.
	State legal action.
	See? It's Pennsylvania. These are the same people who came after the Amish farmer Amos Miller because he was raising cattle naturally and naturally slaughtering them.
	Can't do that. Can't do that.
	We're going to take everything on your farm.
	Well, same state, Pennsylvania.
	This is why I say the fight, folks, is local.
	It can be a lot worse.
	The feds are in on the World Economic Forum game.
	They're in on the game plan. Both Democrats and Republicans.
	The state, however, can make it faster, can make it worse, or they can slow it down, or they can stop it altogether.
	And it can happen at the local level as well.
	So you better pay attention to that.
	Forget about Trump and his hookers and his bribery and all the rest of the stuff.
	And forget about the crooked people that he hired like Michael Cohen.
	Michael Cohen was his guy.
	Everybody's throwing garbage at Michael.
	And he is a rat. But he and Trump were so close for so long.
	What came between them?
	A criminal conviction. Anyway, so...
	These two farmers arrested and jailed on a 30-day sentence with no sentencing hearing and no option for bail.
	Authorities say they're doing this because this is contempt.
	Isn't it interesting that they're not doing that to Trump, right?
	No, they're not throwing him in jail as much as he wants to be thrown in jail.
	Because, see, if they throw him in jail, this judge has given him thousands of dollars of fines, and he's done that like nine or ten times.
	Says, don't do this.
	Don't talk about this on social media.
	Trump talks about it on social media.
	As a matter of fact, he keeps goading this judge to do something.
	But the judge only does the fines.
	Anybody else, like these two farmers, small, you know, oh, you didn't do that?
	Okay, you go to jail right now.
	Just that simple. I've talked many times about a New Jersey weed man who used jury nullification to To beat the rap on a marijuana charge.
	He was not a seller of marijuana, but he was a very, very, very heavy user.
	As a matter of fact, when I was interviewing him, he lit up.
	I started smoking a joint while I'm interviewing him live.
	And we were not in the same room.
	I would have told him to put it out.
	I hate the way that stuff smells.
	Anyway, the...
	He used jury nullification.
	The first judge didn't like it.
	And what he did for jury nullification, he showed them what the state constitution there in New Jersey said about what the duty of the jury is.
	That the duty of the jury is to nullify any laws that they disagree with.
	Or if it's an excessive fine that could be done.
	They might agree with the law, but maybe the fine that has been put along with that law they feel is excessive punishment.
	Either of those things would allow them to nullify that law.
	The judges always want to tell them, you're not here to judge the law.
	Oh, yes, you are.
	Yes, you are.
	That is the final linchpin.
	You see, the founders knew that everything was local.
	That's one of the reasons why they wouldn't have juries.
	You know, we might have a legislature in the state or we might have a federal legislature that gets out of control.
	I don't think they ever envisioned the fact that we would have a rule by bureaucracy, regulation without representation at all.
	But, you know, their final, the linchpin of our freedom was going to be trial by jury because they would have people who would judge whether or not they liked the law, as has happened with William Penn.
	When people say, we don't like this law that has an official state church and throws him in jail, they let him go.
	And then the judge threw the jurors in jail, and then they asserted, well, what law have we broken to nullify your law?
	Show us where the law is that says we can't do that.
	Well, there wasn't one. And furthermore, they said, you know, and part of that was habeas corpus.
	So it established both habeas corpus and jury nullification in that William Penn trial.
	Now here we are, Pennsylvania, the place that was named after William Penn.
	And these people, these judges, these bureaucrats are abusing the legislative, our rights, our due process, in order to enslave us by starvation.
	That's what this is about, folks.
	Let's just go to the end game and understand what this is about.
	So, anyway, Donald Trump, as much as he goads this judge, the judge doesn't throw him in jail.
	Because that's what Donald Trump wants.
	If he gets thrown in jail, they're not going to talk about any of the gossip stuff, which, again, doesn't have anything to do with a legal charge, right?
	So the Democrats want to smear him, and he wants to get thrown into jail so he can trump that, so to speak.
	Anyway, in Pennsylvania, the government's complaint concerns their company, which they called Noble Solutions.
	They offer to help dairy farmers with their reproductive management of cattle.
	So I guess if you have no bull to have more cattle, you can call these guys because they have a no bull solution.
	Robert Barnes is actually their lawyer.
	He says, this is the craziest thing I've ever seen.
	The fight apparently stems from allegations that the two were practicing veterinarian medicine without a license for running ultrasound tests on cattle, a procedure that's common for farmers to use for various reasons.
	Is it practicing medicine without a license to run ultrasound on somebody?
	I don't think it is in these crisis pregnancy centers and stuff.
	It shouldn't be. It shouldn't be to run ultrasound on somebody.
	The result was an investigation by the state of Pennsylvania where officials demanded that the two turn over their records.
	They failed to do what state officials demanded in the report notes that that resulted in contempt orders against the men.
	Now, in defense of this, and again, if this was, you know, in defense of this, they said, well, they didn't follow the due process for these things.
	Eventually, a judge signed an arrest warrant for the two, as well as orders to jail them in their respective counties, warrants that were just recently executed.
	So, The state claims this is punishment for not complying with a subpoena.
	This is a statement by Robert Barnes, their lawyer.
	He said they claim this is punishment for not complying with a subpoena to turn over documents, but an agency can't just order anyone to turn over any document they please.
	For a subpoena to be valid, the jurisdictional validity of the subpoena must be established.
	And it has not been in this case.
	Both men had sought the advice of an attorney regarding the case and had been told that the veterinary medical board had no jurisdiction over them and that the subpoena was therefore invalid and that there was nothing that Ethan and Rusty needed to do.
	In other words, they weren't practicing veterinary medicine.
	They weren't veterinarians.
	So why do they care what the veterinary and medical board wants?
	And now they're saying, ah, but that's the state.
	So, anyway, he says there's also no evidence that either of them ever saw the order that the state claims to have mailed to them last August, which threatened them with arrest if they did not comply.
	They were unaware that this was a possibility.
	It was a complete shock to them and to their families when they were arrested.
	He explained his clients were denied the ability to see the case against them or no bull solutions because the state had the document sealed and hidden.
	Which is a highly unusual move.
	Well, you're going to be seeing a lot of highly unusual moves as they come for our food supply.
	But think about the fact that due process was ignored.
	Are we not seeing that over and over again?
	We've got GOP senators lined up to come up with novel solutions about how they can punish people that are protesting against Israel on campus.
	Now, I don't agree with these protesters, and I don't agree with their methods, and I don't see their methods as being free speech.
	But the GOP is doing anything that it can to pander to a foreign government, including destroying our First Amendment rights and our Constitution.
	I cannot tolerate that.
	I mean, we see everything from propositions to put these protesters on no-fly lists and all the rest of the stuff.
	But due process doesn't matter to anybody, does it?
	Nobody in politics cares about due process anymore.
	So we're going to arrest these two guys because they're using ultrasound and because they're working with local farmers.
	They want to put farming out of business, especially in Pennsylvania.
	But of course, if you want to do GMO and if you want to create a vaccine for all cattle, that's just fine.
	We're going to take a break and when we come back, we're going to talk about some more of the bird flu panic because they keep pushing the button.
	I mean, it's just everywhere.
	And they're continually escalating it.
	The interesting thing is, everybody that I talk to, whether they listen to this program or not, and when I look at comments on Zero Hedge, for example, Zero Hedge has picked up a lot of these fear-mongering articles and put them out there.
	They've done their own.
	They've picked up Epoch Times.
	You've got World Net Daily pushing fear and all the rest of this stuff.
	And so... You know, gain of function is now what they're talking about.
	GOF, right? It's really gain of fear.
	That's really what they're pushing with all this.
	Because nobody wants to do anything about it.
	Everybody says, oh, we've got these bio labs, and that's scary.
	They can do anything. Well, shut them down.
	Shut them down. Obama did.
	Congress did in 2014.
	Then Trump reopened them in 2017.
	Isn't that interesting? And now everybody wrings their hands about these gain-of-function lives, which I think are dangerous.
	I do. I think it's a tremendous waste of money.
	I think they're dangerous.
	I said that back in 2014.
	I was talking about this 10 years ago.
	And yet, nobody wants to talk about shutting them down.
	They want to use them for gain of fear.
	That's what this is really about.
	We're going to take a quick break. We'll be right back.
	Just a small town boy drinking Genetically mortified soy This ensures he doesn't procreate Please stop the reading Stop the reading We are almost 9 billion people Please stop the reading Right now We're
	in our homeland, boys, let it grow where all can see.
	Feed it with our devotion, boys, call it the Liberty Tree.
	It's a tall old tree and a strong old tree.
	And we are the sons, yes, we are the sons, the sons of Liberty.
	We are the sons of Liberty.
	Liberty, it's your move.
	for.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, on Rockfin, thank you very much, Michelle Obama, and thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that. And folks, from what I can tell, the Roku channel is still up.
	We had one day's shows taken down.
	We filed a protest against it.
	Maybe that's why it's still up.
	They don't like us talking about vaccines.
	Too bad. But it is still up.
	So on the off chance, we're able to persist there.
	If you find it there, please like it.
	You can find it by searching for The David Knight Show and Roku app or by searching for The David Knight Show on Roku.
	And it's not Roku that's taking it down at this point.
	It's Vimeo where it has to be hosted.
	And so even if Vimeo continues to attack us, we may be down for a while and then may come back up again because the people who are hosting it for us were working on another alternative thing that they were going to be hosting themselves.
	So we'll see what happens with that.
	But it would help us a great deal if you'd like that.
	It helps us a great deal if you like the stream here.
	Helps us a great deal if you support the program.
	With tips or any way that you wish, you can see how to do that and where you can find the program at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	That will show you the different places and ways that you can watch the film, watch the film, watch the show in either video or on audio format as a podcast.
	Got a lot of links to different places on the podcast because it can be very hard to find the show on some of the podcast platforms.
	If you don't have a direct link, I've had problems finding it.
	So... That's just life in 21st century Western civilization where censorship has become a virtue.
	But nevertheless, you can find direct links to it there.
	And we're up on all the different podcast platforms except for Spotify.
	And then we are also on a lot of different video platforms.
	You'll find links to the live show, which you may or may not be watching right now.
	And you might be watching this as a rebroadcast.
	So all that stuff is there.
	And we're up on Rumble, Rockfin, Odyssey, BitChute, a lot of different places.
	So you can find that there.
	And you can also find out how you can support the program because we are listener-supported.
	That's what really gets us through.
	Tony's been a long-time supporter of ours, and we really do appreciate what he does at Wise Wolf.
	He set up davidknight.gold, and we're going to talk a little bit coming up about what's happening with gold and some interesting things about it as well.
	Costco made headlines for selling gold, but people are finding out there's some interesting things on the back end of the Costco stuff.
	We'll tell you about it. Which I thought was kind of interesting.
	That's not a problem with Tony.
	But anyway, davidnight.gold will take you to Tony's Wise Wolf, and you can buy gold or silver there, small or large purchases.
	You can also get quantity discounts, group buying discounts, I should say, as a part of the Wolf Pack, and you can jump into that.
	A wide variety of different price points on a monthly savings basis.
	So we appreciate Tony's support.
	But for the most part, this program is supported by your donations.
	Because I know it's going to happen if we get a lot of sponsors.
	It can be a rope they use to hang you.
	They always use the money stuff.
	It's always the money.
	So let's talk a little bit about the bird flu.
	Bird flu fears worsen.
	I wonder why. Is it because they keep pushing it all the time?
	The U.S. has provided $200 million to combat the threat.
	No, $200 million to push this as a threat to us.
	Isn't that amazing? You know, we talk about billions now and trillions now.
	A million dollars is a lot of money.
	$200 million for a non-threat.
	But, of course, they do that all the time.
	And also, $200 million to increase the testing, the PCR process.
	Which, again, it's just such a coincidence that Kerry Mullis, who had fought Fauci tooth and nail over the PCR test and Fauci's abuse of it during HIV-AIDS stuff.
	Isn't it amazing? And unfortunate.
	Just an unfortunate accident, I guess, that he, that Kerry Mullis died two months before they began all this stuff.
	Two or three months. That worked out pretty well for them, didn't it?
	And so with PCR testing, it's very much like what Stalin used to do, right?
	Bring me the man and I'll find the crime.
	Well, PCR, they say, bring me the thing and I'll find the pandemic.
	Because I can multiply by 1.1 trillion times.
	And that's what this is.
	This is a Stalin-esque purge.
	A Stalinesque purge of many things in our life.
	A Stalinesque purge of people with the vaccines.
	And so the U.S. government has $200 million to increase testing to recommend PPE, personal protective equipment.
	More monitoring of sick Americans.
	Unfortunately, there's not any testing.
	With all of this fear and panic that you keep coming back to this one guy who got pink eye.
	He got pink eye. Did he cut his little finger?
	You know, come on, give me a break.
	Somebody kiss it and tell him to go on.
	This is a pink eye.
	Pink eye. Like I said, I used to get that stuff all the time when I was in elementary school, first grade.
	That's how I learned to wash my hands and not touch my eyes when there's gnats around there.
	And there's certain gnats that like to get in your eyes.
	But of course, this guy's also working in a dirty environment around cows.
	Did he not practice personal hygiene?
	Did it have anything to do with bird flu?
	And if the worst, if it was bird flu, if the worst that's going to happen is you get pink eye, is that worth shutting down our food supply for?
	Are they going to kill entire cattle, herds of cattle, because one cow tested positive with PCR? Yeah, they will.
	That's the plan. In April, a veterinary company, PetVetDX, announced that they would make available avian influenza PCR tests.
	Bird flu for you and me.
	For poultry and for people in the U.S. and Canada.
	The first company to do so.
	And again, one of the ways that you understand that this bird flu, its total bull excrement, is because they're not testing the eggs of the chicken.
	They're testing the milk of cows.
	Why is that? It's because of what they want to ban.
	Why aren't you testing chicken meat?
	Instead, you're testing cow meat.
	And you're not testing steaks, you're testing ground beef because you're grinding it up and you're exposing it.
	Now you run a PCR test on it, magnify it by a trillion times.
	We all see this, don't we?
	You need to help your friends and neighbors to see this.
	You really do. Or you're going to be seeing nothing to eat.
	Farmers can test their entire houses so the next day the birds can go through their life cycle and be transported to commercial packing plants.
	Oh, really? No, that's so...
	We're going to test the entire houses.
	So if we find one bird, asymptomatic, that blows a positive on this PCR process, then we are going to kill every bird in your flock.
	Yeah. Can you imagine being a farmer and having whoever it is that's doing this, the FDA or the USDA doing this stuff?
	Last week, having them come onto your farm, it's like, oh boy, you know, they're going to kill my farm here with a PCR test.
	Unbelievable. Last week, the Centers for Disease Control, CDC, openly endorsed Making PPE equipment available to workers who are near proximity to livestock.
	Wear that mask so you don't get pink eye.
	Oh, wait a minute. You would still get pink eye, wouldn't you?
	Well, you know, the masks don't work anyway, so don't tell people to wash their hands or anything.
	Let's use that. Hey, you got pink eye?
	We can use that. Did you hear his old finger?
	The FDA has also revealed they're closely monitoring the spread and impact.
	Of bird flu.
	The virus, like all viruses, is mutating, says the FDA. Folks, the narrative, like all narratives, is mutating.
	That's what we're seeing here.
	We're seeing a, for these narratives, what you have is GOF, a gain of fear narrative.
	Be afraid. Be very afraid.
	And they're trying to scare you.
	This narrative is escalating.
	This guy from the FDA says, this world will be 10 times worse than COVID-19 if we get bird flu.
	How does he know that?
	How does he know that there was any problem with COVID-19, except for the rules that were paid for by Trump and Biden?
	We didn't have a problem.
	He said, another one says, well, you know, we need to, we could have a mutation.
	That could happen. You know, anything could happen.
	Well, yeah, you know, the earth could crash into the sun, too, so I guess we should all just commit suicide.
	Anything could happen. He says it's a mathematical probabilistic thing.
	That's what he said. Is this supposed to be science?
	Trust me, it's a mathematical probabilistic thing, you know.
	I would tell you, but you wouldn't understand.
	Because only people like me can really understand that kind of stuff.
	When asked how the FDA can implement a barrier to stop the spread from animals to dairy to people, he said there's no absolute barrier that can be created, but there are elements of protection that are important.
	Kill all the cows.
	That's what these people are doing.
	It's just crazy.
	Meanwhile, the WHO and this good cop, bad cop thing right now, because the WHO is trying to assert its power to globally control the food supply, centrally.
	They're playing good cop right now.
	Well, I don't see any problem here.
	Oh, well, maybe we should let them do the pandemic declaration instead of our crazy feds and state people then, right?
	No, it's just an act.
	It's the good cop, bad cop thing.
	So far, the virus does not show signs of having adapted to spread among humans, but more surveillance is needed.
	Yeah. Yeah, we haven't found anything yet, so we're going to ramp it up, and we're going to magnify it some more.
	We're going to keep looking until we find something, or until we imagine that we found something.
	Based on available information, the WHO continues to assess the public health risk posed by bird flu to be low.
	See? They want the treaty. They want to be a good cop.
	But you watch out what happens if they get that.
	Well, then there's the...
	If pigs could fly...
	What if pigs got bird flu?
	If pigs could flu...
	This is actually an article.
	If pigs get bird flu, we could be in for a real nightmare.
	Oh, yeah. It's already spread to an alarming number of mammals.
	If it reaches pigs, it's more likely to mutate into something that could threaten humans.
	Oh, be afraid. It's just...
	Pigs are the perfect vessels to which a more virulent strain could emerge, they said.
	Well, I guess these demonic bureaucrats are trying to cast the flu into pigs, right?
	At least in your mind.
	At least in the narrative, aren't they?
	Bird flu keeps rewriting the textbooks, I say, on Stat News, a pharma publication.
	It's why scientists are unsettled by the U.S. dairy cattle outbreak.
	It keeps rewriting the textbooks.
	Oh, I thought you had settled science.
	It's changing?
	I didn't think science changed, right?
	That's what we're supposed to...
	Science, these guys already know everything, and, you know, you can't question what they say about climate change.
	But this is changing?
	And they don't know where it's going? And then here's a quote from that article.
	It seems that these viruses must have some kind of, quote, special sauce.
	Ah, there you go. That's science.
	That's science for you. The science of special sauce.
	These people are a joke.
	Just laugh at them.
	It's allowed them to find ways to persistently spread and evolve.
	Yeah, science. Yeah, it's a mathematical probabilistic thing, you know.
	And of course, you know, they're selling this evolution stuff.
	You know that since we have an infinite amount of time, it's not only probable, but it is certain that monkeys evolved into man, that type of thing, right?
	Yeah, right. So, you know, you sit there with a monkey and you give him an infinite amount of time and you let him hit the keys on the typewriter or the keyboard for your computer and see how long it takes him to type Shakespeare.
	Right? It never happened.
	It's a mathematical probabilistic thing, folks.
	Zero. Zero times zero times zero times zero times zero.
	It's infinitesimally small.
	In other words, it's zero.
	The chances of this are net zero.
	Ain't going to happen. That's one of the most fallacious arguments of the evolutionists.
	You know, the monkey with the typewriter thing.
	You know, Carl's saying, well, billions and billions of years, and so it's inevitable that we'll have life evolve in that amount of time just because of...
	Well, you don't know the first thing about statistics, do you?
	The bird flu fight is faltering, says the weak out of UK. Yahoo says, are milk and ground beef safe from bird flu?
	Fear, fear, fear.
	Gain of fear. NBC News.
	Bird flu is bad for poultry and cattle.
	Why, it's not a dire threat for most of us yet, dash yet.
	We'll tell you when to be worried about that.
	We're going to do this, we do it from the inside out.
	We do it with disruption, and we do it iteratively, as the gangster Fauci said.
	No one wants to think about pandemics, but bird flu doesn't care, said Vox.
	Well, I don't care what Vox wants to think about or wants us to think about, do you?
	CDC warns bird flu has pandemic potential, quote-unquote, says Daily Mail.
	The Western Journal warning backyard chickens are not safe.
	They're going to have to be killed. Because all food processing must be centralized.
	This is the perfect MacGuffin.
	All of the corporate elites, all the big guys get what they want, and nobody else gets to wet their beak, as the gangsters would say, right?
	Everything for them, nothing for us.
	We will own nothing.
	We will not be able to grow any food.
	We will own no food.
	They will own everything, and we'll be happier about it, right?
	Backyard chickens are not safe.
	Signs and symptoms could precede a flock decimation.
	You know what would precede a flock decimation of your backyard chickens?
	Some government inspector armed with a phony PCR process.
	Get a search warrant, pal.
	Anyway, even as bird flu looms, the world is unlearning COVID's lessons, says Vox.
	Un-learning the lessons.
	No, I think we did learn the lessons, which is why you want to put it through the food supply now.
	You want to control and shut down our food supply, and you want to vaccinate us through the food.
	Because we've caught on to what you're doing.
	Former CDC director Redfield, under Trump.
	Under Trump. Because, you know, the conservative Trump-sucking press will not tell you who he was CDC director for.
	Redfield, he ran this thing through.
	He says, I could make bird flu highly infectious for humans in months.
	Here's some more of the gain-of-function, gain-of-fear stuff.
	And I have no patience for this because the government could easily do something about this.
	Just stop funding it.
	You don't like Marxism on campuses?
	You don't have to fund it.
	The only thing you're concerned about, though, is not the Marxism.
	You're concerned only about the anti-Semitism.
	You're not concerned about any white-ism or whatever.
	You just keep funding it there.
	So they keep funding these Marxist mobs.
	They keep funding these mad scientists and their sloppy experiments with disease, releasing animals that have been infected, infecting workers that are there through faulty equipment and protective equipment.
	And so that's what they're going to, you know, I could make bird flu highly infectious for humans in months, says Redfield.
	So, as he says, in the lab, I could make it highly infectious for humans in months.
	And everybody puts this out, but nobody wants to do anything about it.
	You know, the Republicans, oh, let's talk about weaponization of government.
	Well, okay, why don't you start with the gain-of-function stuff, man?
	Isn't that a weaponization of government?
	Oh, you're only concerned about the weaponization against you politically, but you're not concerned about what the government does with biological warfare against the people of the United States?
	Yeah, that's exactly where they're coming from.
	Exactly where they're coming from.
	And quite frankly, I'm not buying the fact that they're all that afraid.
	Because if it was biowarfare that's going to be there, They would be just as susceptible as anybody to any of this stuff.
	They're not doing anything about it, which tells me that they're just as skeptical of the efficacy of this gain-of-function stuff as I am.
	Yeah, they can bring in diseases that are not endemic to the United States.
	They have that Burkholderia Pseudo-Malii that was there at the Tulane...
	Institute there. That was something, it was the National Primate Center that was there.
	That was something that was not here in America, but they brought it here.
	And it got outside the lab.
	And so now it's there in Louisiana, perhaps.
	So, that's bad, right?
	But if they can make this, you know, weaponize it like Trump's CDC director boasted, if these guys really believe that, don't you think they would shut it down?
	Quite frankly, I don't think they have that kind of power.
	I think they thought they might have that kind of power.
	I think they thought they might have been doing that at Wuhan.
	But obviously, it didn't work this time.
	Maybe they'll get it right at some point in the future.
	All the more reason to shut it down, but the federal government won't shut it down.
	The escalating threat of avian influenza and the ethical quandary of gain of fear research.
	This is Zero Hedge. More fear baiting from them.
	This is not an article that they put.
	This is something they put out.
	Since the highly pathogenic bird flu was first identified in humans in 2003, Zero Hedge informs us approximately 600 cases have been reported worldwide with a lab-confirmed case fatality rate of 60%.
	Okay, so let's think about this.
	We've got 21 years.
	It's 2003.
	21 years, 8 billion people, and you say you've got 600 cases?
	Is that something we should be concerned about?
	I don't think so.
	I don't think so. How many people died in the bathtub?
	A lot more than that over 21 years, over the world population, right?
	This is not something to be fear-mongering about.
	Shame on Zero Hedge for doing this.
	And I've seen people, I didn't look at the comments for this one, but I've seen their listeners, hundreds of comments, 500, 1,000 comments, all of them that I saw.
	Shame on these people. This is clickbait, fear-baiting, all the rest of this stuff.
	The readers of Zero Hedge know better.
	Why is Zero Hedge doing this kind of stuff?
	And then pushing out articles.
	They wrote this article. This is not from Epoch Times.
	Epoch Times does it as well.
	So you got 8 billion people, 21 years, and the best they can do is come up with 600 cases.
	Now, certainly it's not an epidemic by any means, right?
	By any definition, is that an epidemic?
	Shouldn't be. If it is, then there's something wrong with your redefinition of epidemic.
	But if we have people that they say died from this, did they die from it?
	Or did they die with it, with a PCR test?
	Because a PCR test, a PCR process that Carey Mullis did, goes back to AIDS and HIV, back to the 80s.
	So they're talking about something in 2003 and on, over the last 20 years.
	Of course they've been using a PCR test.
	Did they give us any indication that these people tested positive and died from something else or whatever?
	This was the case from the very beginning.
	We knew this was the game that they were playing in 2020.
	Don't tell me about this now.
	Come on. Zero Hedge, were you born yesterday?
	Did you miss that whole 2020 thing?
	Well, of course you did because you support Trump.
	You don't care about any of that stuff.
	Right? Just flushed it down the memory hole.
	The recent death of a woman in southwest China who had no contact with poultry signals a potentially alarming shift in the virus's transmission dynamics.
	Okay. Did she die from bird flu?
	Or some kind of process?
	PCR process.
	And we can believe this because it's coming from where?
	From China? China lies about everything.
	They lie even more than our own government does, perhaps.
	Certainly as much.
	That was one of the key tells of this whole thing from the very beginning.
	At first, it was like, oh, wait a minute.
	They say this started right there.
	The wet market?
	Well, wait a minute. The biofunction safety lab 4, which is the highest level of the most dangerous pathogens, is right there.
	Maybe it has something to do with that.
	And then they started staging people falling down in the streets, and it was really fake.
	So I said, nope. This is a dark winter game.
	It's dark winter 2. Raising the specter of human-to-human transmission, as reported by the Federation of American Scientists.
	You can't trust these NGOs of science and medicine anymore.
	No more. Who needs Wuhan if we've got shady biolabs here in America?
	This is Richard Blakely covering ongoing unanswered questions about a California facility.
	Now, they're worried about the fact that China has set up bio labs here, and of course, you know, with CRISPR, It's very easy for people to get involved in this.
	It's very easy for the Chinese to open up these labs here.
	Wuhan was the first Biosafety Level 4 lab, of course, and the only one that they had.
	We had, back in 2014, when they shut this stuff down initially, we had, at that point in time, 200 Biosafety Level 3 and 4 labs in the United States.
	Most of them connected to a university.
	Yet another reason to shut these universities down.
	Yeah. You got the Marxist seminaries.
	You got the bioweapons labs.
	And of course, we had a bunch of them in Ukraine as well.
	So, you know, these people push this, but they never do anything about it, right?
	Why don't you expose it? Why don't you shut it down in Ukraine?
	Why doesn't Congress do something?
	Oh, they'll hold hearings. Jim Jordan, Rand Paul, they'll hold hearings, but they won't ever do anything.
	Well, the FDA is preparing for possible bird flu spread among humans, says the commissioner.
	So you better prepare.
	You better prepare.
	And you better prepare by fighting them.
	Fighting them at the local and the state level.
	You better start fighting against this pandemic stuff and pushing really hard.
	There is some momentum there, but you better push back even more.
	And you need to push back to protect the local agriculture, because that's what the Food and Drug Administration is doing.
	They want food and drugs to merge in reality, just as they are merged in their little bureaucratic empire.
	On Rumble, DG8, don't tell me how bad bird flu is as long as McDonald's, Taco Bell, and KFC are still selling that toxic garbage.
	On Rockfin, Eric, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that. That's very generous.
	Thank you. On Rumble, Marky Mark, New Jersey, thank you for the tip.
	He says to see a table of gases in the Earth's atmosphere, go to page 17 here.
	He's got a link. CO2 is 0.033%.
	Okay. So, yeah, that's right.
	I said, is it 0.4 or 0.04?
	Yeah, it'd be actually less than 0.04 according to that table.
	Thank you. On Rockfin, Dougalug, thank you for the tip.
	And he thanks us.
	Thank you, Dougalug.
	I appreciate it. And on Rumble, RCF2020, thank you very much for the tip.
	Excuse me. He says, this is reminding me of the Zika virus they were fear-mongering prior to the Rio Summer Olympics.
	Do you remember that? Yeah, we're all going to wind up with shrunken heads.
	But the good news is that it's going to put Ripley's, believe it or not, out of business.
	This whole thing is a Ripley's, believe it or not, pandemic.
	Rumble, by his love, says, my daughter-in-law told me that she hates whites yesterday.
	She's white. Then she says she doesn't like people who are racist.
	This is the schools.
	This is the, my son is madly in love, supports her in all ways, smiles and said, you must not like You must not like you are privileged.
	My kiddos really believe the propaganda stuff.
	Well, yeah, it is propaganda.
	And it's amazing.
	The articles I've got here, if we get to it, in New York, They just said, well, you've got all these measures being taken.
	We're going to shut down free speech.
	We're going to put the no-fly list on steroids.
	There should be no such thing as no-fly list.
	You've got Republicans who want to unleash the IRS against anybody that criticizes a foreign government.
	You've had before this, you've had DeSantis and Noam and their hunger for power.
	You know, I want to be president, I want to be vice president, and I need some donors.
	So they, you know, pander to Israel and say, we're going to make it a crime, an actual crime to criticize a foreign government.
	And with all this stuff happening, and everybody talking about racist this and racist that, in New York, they've got a, I think it's a $2.5 billion project.
	No whites are allowed to bid on it.
	Yeah, tell me about that.
	Tell me about how no whites are allowed to go to Harvard unless you can check some other boxes, right?
	Unless you're part of the endowment crowd.
	Or unless, you know, you've got some other special DEI boxes that you can check.
	You can't go there. They're fine with that.
	The Republicans are fine with that.
	The Republicans will rip the Constitution to shreds for a corrupt foreign government that desires to impose censorship on us.
	Let me tell you, the First Amendment is the First Amendment because it's the most important.
	And I really believe it's more important than the Second Amendment.
	And I believe it's more important than the Due Process Amendments.
	I believe it's more important than the Constitution itself.
	This prohibition.
	Against attacking free speech.
	And I know they've got all their little devices to say, well, we're not doing it.
	The company that, you know, does business with us, so we told them they're not going to do any business with us if they don't do it.
	They're the ones who are doing it.
	You're blackmailing them.
	You're lying to us.
	You're bribing them. You're blackmailing them to do your work, and it's your work.
	And we've even found the emails where they put that stuff out there, social media, for a variety of different narratives.
	And it's absolutely reprehensible for the GOP to prostitute themselves that way to a foreign government to eviscerate our First Amendment rights.
	They're beyond despicable.
	And let me tell you, if they will openly prostitute themselves to a foreign government, what do you think they'll do behind the scenes?
	To what interest do you think they'll sell out?
	Would they sell out to big pharmaceutical companies?
	Well, of course they would. Big agri-companies?
	Of course they would. Will they sell you out when it comes to your home, your car, your appliances, everything in your life?
	They will sell you out to the globalists, just like they're selling out the First Amendment to Israel.
	These people have no principles whatsoever.
	They hate this country, and you should reject them as well.
	The WHO aims to monitor and control the global food supply.
	Well, not even trying to hide it, are they?
	Yeah? That's always been the goal.
	And again, the battle is going to be over the local food stuff.
	Liberty Council action summarized this WHO initiative.
	Because they've got not just this is not the pandemic treaty.
	This is not the rule changes to make them the global grand poobah to lock down any and every country that they wish.
	This is the WHO Alliance for Food Safety.
	For food safety, they want to take over the food.
	See, just like the FDA. They want to do drugs, they want to do food.
	And combine the two together.
	So this new plan from the WHO Food Safety Alliance for global governance just launched an alliance to control what you eat.
	The alliance will have authority over what food is being produced, how it will be produced, how it will be managed, how it will be inspected, and where the food will be distributed.
	And also make sure that there is no unvaccinated food.
	We just had some legislators here in Tennessee say, you are not going to be able to genetically modify plants and sneak your mRNA stuff in there.
	And they go, oh, you're crazy, you're crazy.
	No, here are the research papers where they're working on this right now.
	Multiple places where they're working on vaccinating you through vegetables that you eat.
	But this whole thing about bird flu is to vaccinate you through the cattle and the chickens and the pigs and whatever else that you eat.
	They want to vaccinate us through the food because people caught on to what they're doing.
	And so they always look for the sneakiest way to continue to do what they want to do.
	The One Health approach is what this new plan is using, and of course One Health is at Gates' UN organization that was set up.
	Last year David Bell explained that One Health is designed to use fear to control us and to justify our restriction, our impoverishment, our death.
	That's what this is about, folks.
	These guys are playing for the big one right here.
	One Health is also a cult.
	Based on Gaia worship, Wicca, and neo-paganism.
	This is from Technocracy News, and he's absolutely right about this.
	One Health policies seek to merge man and the earth into oneness.
	Christians, you need to have some discernment about this.
	You need to understand what this truly is.
	Look at that. Show that picture there.
	Yeah. Creepy, crazy stuff.
	This is an age-old religion, he writes, associated with paganism, Wicca, and Gaiaism, which needs to be called out for what it is.
	So the CDC is defining One Health as a collaborative, multi-sectoral, transdisciplinary approach, working at the local, regional, national, and global levels.
	Show that diagram down there.
	Just a little bit, yeah. Keep it fixed on that.
	I'm going to talk about that. That picture...
	Depicts a very small man.
	He's very small compared to, of course, actually bigger than scale, but compared to the Earth.
	But the man is very small.
	And the man is completely subsumed inside public health.
	And public health is completely subsumed into global health.
	And global health is completely subsumed into their organization.
	Isn't that convenient? Isn't that nice?
	And it really is, they don't want to show it that way, but it's a hierarchical system with you at the very bottom of their pyramid.
	Well, you know, since these multi-billion dollar corporations and industries have done such a good job so far, I think we should trust these guys.
	Oh, yeah. Yeah, that's right.
	Yeah, they want a top-down pyramid structure of power and global.
	Global. So it's not just they want global health, but one health.
	Wants to be in charge of all global health.
	And then, all of that is inside the circle of the Earth, which they call planetary health.
	When people start talking to you about the planet's health, you know that you're talking to some whacked-out pagan, okay, who is anthropomorphizing the planet.
	That's what Gaiaism really is.
	They said, we have to recognize, says the CDC in their own language, we have to recognize the interconnection between people, animals, plants, and their shared environment.
	Another 19 federal agencies are wrapped into the one health mantra, having been sucked into the whole of government vortex created under the Clinton administration.
	When we talk about whole of government, it's what we saw with Biden in the spring of 2022 when he put out a whole of government directive about central bank digital currency.
	And he said, I want every one of the bureaucratic agencies, because every one of the bureaucratic agencies is under the president's office, the entire swamp, What did he do in those four years?
	Well, nothing. You know, made it worse.
	And they're all under Biden.
	And they operate with executive orders based on imaginary emergencies and things like that.
	Or they just do whatever they wish because the Congress kicks the ball over to them.
	Congress has got more important things to do.
	They want to get on TV. They want to hold show trials.
	They want to raise money.
	You know, they don't want to be bothered writing laws.
	Come on. You know, we'll have to pass it so we can find out what's in it.
	And let these people in the deep state or the swamp or whatever you want to call it, the bureaucracy that's there.
	And so when they talk about whole of government, that means that Clinton...
	Gave this One Health Mantra thing, gave it to every government agency.
	You've all got something to do.
	In the same way that when Biden did the whole-of-government approach to CBDC in March of 2022, he said, you know, six months, and I want you to report back in one of four areas.
	How are you going to completely redesign the financial system?
	How are you going to write the code?
	How are we going to enforce it?
	Law enforcement.
	Get the Department of Justice involved with enforcing people to use CBDC. And then the fourth one was the environment.
	How are we going to save the environment with CBDC? Let's hear some stories about that.
	And they make up stuff about that.
	But yeah, 19 federal agencies wrapped up in that.
	And so as Technocracy News talks about how pagan this is, he talks about two aspects of it.
	The Gaia aspect of it and the Wicca aspect of it.
	And both of those are wrapped into paganism.
	Gaiaism is an earth-centered, philosophical, spiritual, holistic, scientifically rational opinion, says one occultic site.
	Yeah, it does try to use the veneer of science.
	Lovelock, who was the guy who came up with this whole fantasy idea and eventually rejected man-made global warming.
	But he was the one who was pushing guyism.
	And I remember when we went to the UK, took our sons, they were about 8 or 10, I guess.
	No, they were under 10, 2001.
	So, there were eight and nine.
	Anyway, we took them there, and that was everywhere.
	And we sat on a train, and there's a magazine, somebody left, called Science Magazine.
	And it had Lovelock talking about Gaia theory.
	I said, come on, they're pushing this as if it were science?
	Are you kidding me? How gullible do people have to be to buy into this climate change stuff?
	And this mythology, it's Greek mythology.
	And as I've said before, we took them around and, you know, we're going museum after museum.
	They're starting to get kind of antsy because they're young.
	So we took them to the Children's Museum because up on the third floor, there's a place where they could play in a playground and type of thing.
	But they had a TV program there.
	There was a loop of about 10-minute video that was explaining Gaia theory and doing it in the background for the kids who were playing.
	You know, kind of subconsciously put it in, I guess.
	And it was talking about how Gaia was this sentient being.
	The earth is some kind of sentient being.
	This is why when you hear Hollywood people like Jennifer Lawrence say, Oh, Mother Earth is angry with us.
	She's dead serious.
	That's her religion.
	That's the pagan religion these people believe.
	They believe that the earth is a sentient being.
	And they believe that human beings are a, wait for it, a virus.
	And so we need to be eliminated.
	That's where this depopulation stuff fits into this pagan philosophy here.
	So, Gaiaism is supposedly scientifically rational, says a cultic sign.
	It shares expressions with various religions, such as earth religions and paganism, while not identifying exclusively with any specific one.
	Because it's another religion, it's the climate change religion, and that is a religion.
	It is a worldview.
	It comes with its own set of commandments of what you must do and what you must not do and all the rest of this stuff.
	Gaia, the Mother Earth, often reviewed as the Earth Mother, symbolizes the interconnectedness of all living things.
	Based on Greek mythology, this primal goddess who gave birth to the Titans and gave life to the world.
	Gaia is embraced by practitioners of various spiritual paths, including Wicca and paganism, as representations of the Earth's nurturing and life-giving essence.
	But they don't really talk about it as a virtual representation.
	They talk about it very seriously.
	That's why I say, you've got scientists out there who are pushing this Gaia theory?
	I think they just jumped the shark.
	told us what they are. The spirit of Gaia in Wicca is also there. Paganism, human beings are seen as part of nature along with other animals, trees, stones, plants and everything else that is of this earth. And so again James Lovelock who I realized that he died in 2022, another climate alarmist who pictured the earth as a living organism.
	He was also a technocrat who said, quote, we need a more authoritarian world.
	We've become sort of a cheeky egalitarian world where everyone can have their say.
	It may be necessary to put democracy on hold for a while.
	Well, we keep hearing that from all these people.
	Trudeau, I love China.
	You know, they just, they want to save the environment?
	They just do it. Whatever they want.
	That's great. I love that totalitarianism.
	And he's doing his best to instill it in Canada as well.
	This threat of eco-authoritarianism is often linked to a rising tendency toward technocracy.
	Say, two scholars at the University of Westminster...
	Which suggested their decisions should be left to those with relevant scientific and technical expertise.
	This, it is implied, will speed up decision-making and generate more effective green outcomes.
	Yeah, you see, if we have a technocracy, we can do things at, well, what should we say?
	Warp speed. Yeah, warp speed.
	Geez, we'll affect their faith now, you know, so that type of thing, you know, where no man has gone before because nobody wanted to go there.
	These people are going to push us there.
	They're going to say it's an emergency.
	Since One Health has been crammed down our throats by our government, Republican and Democrat, you know, that started with Clinton.
	Then we had George W. And we had Donald Trump.
	It is safe to say that the new state-mandated religion has been declared.
	The final proof is this.
	Just try to criticize it, especially if you're a Christian, and see what happens to you.
	Yeah, we know. On Rock Fan Handy.
	Good to see you there. DK, I was driving and listening early.
	I'm convinced the reason for testing ground beef is because it's a form of batch testing.
	Many different cows go into mass-produced ground beef.
	Oh, there you go. That's even better than just exposing it to the air.
	Let's grind up representatives from the entire herd.
	If we can find something that we can magnify by a trillion times, It's just unbelievable.
	Unbelievable. Yes, if only we could see that well.
	We wouldn't need to put up any space probes.
	If we could just magnify this stuff by a trillion times, it would all just be right there for us to see it.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	Music We're
	to be continued...
	The End...
	Making Sense.
	Common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, welcome back. We're going to move on from food, spelled P-H, like pharma.
	But before we go, a couple of quick comments here on Rumble.
	RCF 2020, thank you for the tip.
	Very much the world, he says, or she, is going to meet in France for the Summer Olympics in a few months.
	I find the timing of the phony bird flu suspicious.
	Yeah. Yeah, they can certainly use that for their evolving narrative, can't they?
	Oh yeah, we all flew in and we got the bird flu and we flew out.
	And it's flu everywhere.
	Yeah, that's what they'll do.
	Very, very likely.
	Rumble, Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip as well.
	I've turned them over to a reprobate mind.
	Because you fail to honor me as God and worship the creation rather than the creator.
	That's the curse these people are under that worship the earth.
	Absolutely. Worship the creature.
	Worship... You know, Mother Earth diet that's sending us hurricanes, as the Hollywood crowd tells us, and all the rest of this stuff.
	You know, don't make Mother Earth angry.
	That silly commercial that they had.
	There was a margarine versus butter.
	But, you know, that's the world.
	That was something people mocked and laughed.
	It's done as a comedy. Now these people are serious about this stuff.
	And it really is a reprobate mind.
	Let's talk a little bit about something that is very reprobate.
	That's the Euro trash contest that was there.
	Greta Thunberg showed up.
	Because, you know, she's always going to protest something.
	Well, the thing to protest right now is Israel.
	That's what's hip to protest everywhere.
	So she shows up because, from what I could see of the videos that I saw, the Israeli contestant was the only one who could sing.
	We're like MTV or something.
	She actually had a really good voice, even though I didn't like the song.
	I'm not going to play any of this stuff because I didn't like any of it.
	But all the rest of the people were struggling to sing, so they had to have a gimmick.
	And it seems like their gimmick was sex and the occult and all the rest of this stuff.
	On Rock fan Michelle Obama, thank you for the tip.
	It says, Gideon was no fool for he trusted in the Lord and his gun.
	I mean, sword. Yeah, that's right.
	That's right. So Greta shows up.
	She's very angry and wants to boycott the Israeli singer.
	And so this is a contest of a lot of this pagan trash that we were just talking about.
	And also, the conflict of Israel versus Palestine was there.
	So, Switzerland, as the Daily Skeptic says, may have snatched the crown.
	And Croatia barely clinched the popular vote, but Israel bagged top points in the televote from the highest number of countries, including the rest of the world, quote-unquote, of the 2024 Eurovision.
	The thing I don't understand is, when did Israel join Europe?
	I don't... What is this about?
	Did they get into NATO or something?
	Is that what this is about?
	I don't know. I'm scratching my head about that in the first place.
	But... This has taken on a hyper-nationalism.
	Isn't it interesting to see all these people wringing their hands about nationalism this and about nationalism that, about Christian nationalism and so forth?
	When they have these competitions like the Olympics and now this music contest, I guess you could say, loosely using the term music, they have these contests and it's all about the nation, right? We did this and we did that.
	It's this tribal thing that I really hate about sports.
	But now they bring that into the singing stuff.
	And it's more about country versus country than it is about the singers themselves.
	The singers who have the talent, the singers who put in the work or don't have the talent and who didn't put in the work.
	But they elevate them because they're from our country, that type of stuff.
	This is all the stuff that's bad about the Olympics, I think, but it also shows what hypocrites these people are.
	Oh, they supposedly hate nationalism, don't they?
	They hate our nationalism.
	They hate racism?
	No, they hate our race.
	You know, it's that type of thing, always, that we see.
	They hate Christian nationalism?
	Oh, but they love Euro-trash nationalism, don't they?
	It really is stupid. A lot of press about it, so I thought I would mention it just from the standpoint of the winner.
	And here is the winner of the contest here of the Eurotrash.
	They have a Eurotrash trainee.
	Switzerland's non-binary rapper Nemo wins the Eurovision Song Contest, and Drudge is very excited about that.
	I'll put that up at the top there.
	Yesterday. Yeah, this is the guy.
	You know, in a dress and all the rest of the stuff.
	So, non-binary Nemo wins.
	And... And he's a rapper to boot.
	Like I said, it's not about music at all.
	Quincy Jones said, rap ain't music.
	And Quincy Jones should know.
	He's an excellent musician and producer.
	He'd produce all kinds of different genres of music.
	He was not just a record producer for a lot of pop artists.
	He did his own stuff. He did a lot of soundtracks and everything.
	And he was black, and he says, no, it's not rap, it's talk.
	And he says, this is talk.
	It's not music. It's not sophisticated at all.
	And here are his lyrics.
	And they're not sophisticated either.
	This is the tranny.
	The song that he did was The Code.
	And again, I will spare you the performance.
	I don't want people getting morning sickness unless they're pregnant here.
	For Nemo, the code is a source of personal healing and a declaration of freedom.
	The song articulates their journey.
	Again, referring to this guy in the multiple pronouns because perhaps he's not in that body by himself.
	There might be other spirits in there with him.
	The song articulates their journey from a period of loneliness and uncertainty to a place of happiness and self-acceptance upon breaking free from societal constraints.
	Yes, they promise freedom, but they themselves are slaves of sin, aren't they?
	Enslaved by a sexual addiction that has taken over their life.
	Everything is about their sex.
	About sex, what they are, how they dress.
	That's their entire life.
	It's actually really sad and pathetic, isn't it?
	I'm done playing the game, he says in the lyrics.
	I'll break out of the chains.
	No, he is promising freedom, but he's enslaved.
	And then he has some specific references that are biblical here.
	To thumb his nose.
	I went to hell and back to find myself on track.
	Oh, you haven't experienced hell yet.
	And that's what we should all be concerned about.
	That's what happens when people thumb their nose at God, and he does.
	He said, I broke the code, OO, like Ammonites.
	I just gave it some time.
	The Ammonites out of the Old Testament, right?
	Hebrews. The Ammonites were a nation that was born out of incest.
	Out of incest.
	Lot's daughters. Now I found paradise.
	I broke the code, O-O. And he talks about, here's his little clever thing.
	The code, he means, is the difference between zeros and ones, right?
	In a binary code, you can only be a zero-one.
	In the real world, you're only male or female.
	Oh, but he broke that code.
	He's found something that's not a zero or a one, not a male or female.
	And that's where I found My Kingdom Comes.
	He's filled with references, illiterate references to the Bible.
	And then you have this really pagan witch who calls herself a witch out of Ireland.
	She also goes by the name Bambi Thug.
	And she declares that the queers are coming.
	And she also goes by they, them pronouns.
	She is a self-described queer witch who says the queers are coming after her victory.
	She's very bitter about the fact that she was kicked off to the side because, you know, it isn't the fact that she can't sing or how she looks is repulsive.
	No, it's the fact that people are prejudiced against her.
	And then she goes on to say, but we're winning.
	The queers are coming because this Nemo guy who dresses up as a woman I'm so proud of us.
	The world has spoken.
	The queers are coming.
	Non-binaries for the win, she says.
	I am so proud that all of us are in the top ten that have been fighting for this sh** before it seems.
	Because it has been so hard.
	It has been so hard.
	I'm so, I'm so glad of us.
	And I just want to say, we are what the Eurovision is.
	EBU is not what the Eurovision is.
	F*** the EU. I don't even care anymore.
	F*** them. The thing that makes us contestants, the community behind it, the love and the power and the support of all of us is what is making change.
	And the world has spoken.
	The queers are coming.
	Yeah, yeah.
	It's really sad, isn't it?
	It's really sad. You look at somebody like that, so detached from reality, so detached from God, and bitter, and it's just amazing to see this, and yet there is another interview, which I'm not going to show you, where she was talking to a guy in Ireland, and she was talking about how she is there to influence the kids, and that's what this is about.
	But it's all okay. You know, nobody is upset about that, really.
	It's all about this singer from Israel who, from the little bit that I saw, seemed to be kind of normal, right?
	But they don't talk about this as being normal versus pagan, queer witch stuff.
	No, it's about Israel versus everybody else.
	And so they nationalized this competition.
	And what is happening, the moral suicide of the West...
	The decadence, the self-absorption, the lovers of self, the lovers of Satan, none of this gets any attention.
	It's all just about Israel versus Palestine.
	We'll be right back. The Common Man The Common Man They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com Alright, well, I'm going to go ahead and get started.
	while the Euro trash contest is, you know, using this like MTV to influence younger kids, you think this isn't here?
	You think this isn't being used here?
	The U.S. government is mandating preferred pronouns in all workplaces.
	This is the way we always see it done, through contracts.
	You've got a government contract, they own you.
	If you have a government contract, if you work for the government, if you've got a government contract with them, You have signed yourself over to the devil.
	Quite literally, folks.
	Because that's how it's going to be used.
	You've made this Faustian bargain, or we should say a Faustian bargain.
	That's the way they ran these mandates through.
	People who had a contract. You don't do this, we're going to take away the money that we're giving you.
	Your hospital, you don't vaccinate your nurses and doctors.
	We're going to take away that bonus that Trump gave you.
	For lying about a COVID pandemic.
	Oh, give you $13,000 if you point at somebody and say they got COVID. You don't have to have even a PCR process.
	Just point at them.
	Do a clinical diagnosis, $13,000.
	You put them on a ventilator, $39,000.
	Then we'll give you a 20% bonus on everything that you charge them for until you kill them.
	And then the Trump administration will give a death bonus You say that the person died from COVID, didn't die from your remdesivir, didn't die from your neglect, didn't die from the ventilator intubation, which they probably did.
	But you say they died from COVID. If the family doesn't contest that, We'll give them a couple of thousand dollars for burial.
	How's that? We'll pay everybody off, right?
	Always about the bribery, the blackmail.
	And so this is the way the government is now applying LGBT blackmail to all workplaces.
	As of this week, failing, last week actually came out.
	Failing to respect a queer person's non-binary pronouns is the newest form of workplace discrimination recognized under the landmark 1964 Civil Rights Act.
	The new pronoun mandate...
	By the way, it's not a law.
	This is an executive declaration from the president, which Trump and Biden are both so fond of.
	The new pronoun mandate for workers, employers, and even customers...
	It was issued by the EEOC. It's a rule.
	It's a rule. We're ruled by people who make the rules.
	As part of the Civil Rights Agency's first move in a quarter of a century to bring workplace guidance up to date with legal precedent and evolving norms.
	Yeah, they're moving the Overton window.
	And how are they moving it? With money.
	The 189-page document.
	I didn't realize there were that many different pronouns, did you?
	It takes 189 pages, which is technically legally non-binding, okay, because it is a rule.
	But here's the problem.
	Rules are not laws, so they're technically not legal.
	And if you violate them, though, you don't have any presumption of innocence.
	You don't get due process.
	And you don't have any protection against excessive fines.
	And so, yeah, it's even worse than something that would be legally binding.
	It's born out of bureaucratic scheming and trickery, which is the worst aspect of all this stuff, all of this regulation without representation.
	Misgendering must be repeated.
	It must be intentional.
	It cannot be simply a slip of the tongue.
	It has to rise to the level of workplace harassment.
	So, in other words, if I repeatedly call Bruce Gender Bruce Jinder, which I always do, that would be an EEOC violation.
	Come on. You're not going to tell me what to say.
	Absolutely not going to tell me what to say.
	You're not going to tell me who I can criticize and who I can't criticize.
	You're not going to tell me what I have to believe.
	I have freedom of religion and free speech, and the way we use that is to defy these tyrants, or we lose it.
	I said it's... The EEOC has decreed, that's their word, that it is discriminatory for an employer to deny a transgender person access to the bathroom that they want to use, even if that invades the privacy of other workers.
	Wait a minute! I thought that we had a right to privacy.
	Oh, well, not when it comes to bathrooms or dressing rooms for women, right?
	And especially women, right?
	It's women's right to privacy.
	That's only if you want to kill your kid.
	If you want to have privacy in the dressing room or the bathroom, you don't get that.
	No. We have a hierarchy, a pecking order of this so-called equity, this so-called equality.
	There is a pecking order in it, isn't there?
	So yeah, no right to privacy for women.
	Not from the Biden administration.
	You only have a right to murder babies.
	You don't have a right to my body, my choice when it comes to the masks and the lockdowns and the vaccines and the rest of it.
	No, no, no, no, no. That was just, you know, what they say to kill babies.
	The new standards were adopted over a 3-2 vote along party lines after the bureaucrats, the investigatory panel, got 37,000 public comments on the updates that were proposed last October.
	You know what they don't tell you? Is if the comments were 36,999 against and won four, they're not going to tell you that either.
	They don't care. See, the comments don't matter.
	This is not representative government.
	They don't have to pay any attention to the comments.
	Comments are not votes.
	They don't weigh on them that way.
	As a matter of fact, for a lot of these things, we're just skipping the comment process anyway.
	Because it doesn't make any difference.
	These bureaucrats will do what they wish.
	Unelected, unaccountable, regulation without representation.
	That's what we're talking about here.
	And it is everywhere in the federal government.
	That's why I said the federal government is gone.
	Absolutely gone. And all this brave talk about, you know, fixing it if Trump gets in again, which he didn't do anything the first time.
	If he fires some people, Which he's now talking about possibly doing.
	We'll see. If you fire some people, if they don't fix the structural changes, nothing's going to change.
	And quite frankly, we see this over and over again.
	The GOP does not want a good system.
	They want an authoritarian system that serves them.
	They're no different from the Democrats.
	It's just who gets to rule.
	It's just like the radical feminists.
	They don't want equality with men.
	They don't want a patriarchy.
	They want a matriarchy.
	And it's that same way with Republicans and Democrats.
	They don't want to have an equitable, legal, balanced system.
	They just want to rule.
	So, it's no exaggeration to say that That queer theory is now firmly ensconced into the U.S. law, except that it is not U.S. law.
	That was commentary from UnHerd, by the way.
	It is not U.S. law.
	It truly is, however.
	It's queer theory. It's not a theory.
	It's a religion for these people.
	It's a pagan religion. And it is that religion that is now ensconced into U.S. law.
	And you will bow to that religion.
	You will follow its commandments.
	And you'll be punished if you violate those commandments.
	And so... They go on to say, Daily Skeptic then says, it's hard to understand how in a supposedly federal system like America, the central government can stipulate that every workplace in the country, and customers as well, must conform to confused people's gender fantasies.
	But there you have it. Well, it's hard to understand.
	These people are coming from the UK, Daily Skeptic.
	They spell it with a C instead of a K. But it is hard to understand because it has nothing to do with our form of government.
	This is something that is a bluff that's being imposed upon us because the Constitution is not self-enforcing.
	This has nothing to do with the Constitution.
	It has nothing to do with the rule of law.
	Daily Skeptic goes on.
	The writer says, personally, I blame Neil Gorsuch, the supposedly conservative originalist justice who joined with the liberals in the Bostock case.
	He actually wrote the majority opinion in arguing that constitutional protections for sex applied equally to gender identity.
	His facile logic?
	That it is impossible for an employer to make an adverse employment decision based on, quote, transgender status, unquote, without thereby discriminating, quote, because of sex, unquote.
	Since a man who suffers adverse treatment because he identifies as a woman is treated differently than he would be if he was a woman who identifies as a woman.
	Yes, Neil, but the point is he isn't a woman.
	This point of mere biological fact is It was lost on such a lofty legal mind, unfortunately.
	And now a country of 350 million people is living with the idiotic and tyrannical consequences.
	So, you know, this will most likely be supported by the Supreme Court.
	If you choose to violate this, you will probably lose, even if you take it all the way to the Supreme Court and they agree to hear it.
	No reason not to do it.
	You know, that's the way that we change things.
	We have to defy these injustices.
	And we have to defy what is being imposed on us.
	In Canada, they're constructing a $13 million monument in Ottawa, their capital, to the, quote, 2SLGBTQI+. They put two spirits there at the front of it.
	I think there's more than two spirits in most of these people here.
	You know, I mean, we are legion.
	I mean, they are possessed with a lot of different spirits.
	But, you know, they're tearing down George Washington and Robert E. Lee and, you know, Grant, everybody, okay?
	All these monuments of our history are being torn down.
	And yet they're going to spend $13 million to put up a monument to the LGBT stuff in Canada.
	The proposed design is blurring the lines between real life and parody.
	Construction began in downtown Ottawa last week with activists, politicians, and, quote, indigenous elders, unquote, attending a groundbreaking ceremony to commemorate the structure being put up.
	It's going to cost 13 million Canadian dollars.
	It's going to be taken from the LGBT Purge Fund.
	That's interesting. They've got a purge fund for the LGBT? Is that as in, like, vomiting or something?
	You know, somebody has bulimia, they purge?
	Certainly makes me want to vomit to see this kind of stuff here.
	A non-profit that is entrusted with nearly $24 million won from the Canadian government in a class-action discrimination lawsuit.
	Canada will be home to the first national 2SLGBTQI plus monument in the world, says Liberal MP Seamus O'Regan.
	Well, they have absolutely no ability to be shamed, I guess.
	They're beyond that. And he showed a picture of what this thing is going to be.
	It's going to be a cylinder with gaping holes.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Isn't that great? Instructor received plenty of backlash for its confusing design, with one writer in Calgary saying, you're making people hate us.
	Hey, I'm LGBT and you're making people hate us.
	Yeah, they are. They are.
	With the mandates, you know, you tell me that I've got to use their pronouns.
	Tell me I can't, I've got to, some guy thinks that he's Napoleon and I've got to salute and march behind him.
	All this kind of stuff. No, thanks.
	I'm not going to do that. What makes us the laughingstock of the world?
	Why do we need a monument celebrating sexuality?
	You people are really pushing this for a reason, and I don't want my tax dollars funding this crap, said another.
	Yeah, this is, you know, they build these monuments to celebrate sexuality.
	That's a very old pagan thing, right?
	Used to have the Asherah, Asherah poles.
	Virtue signaling aside, could it be any uglier, said one person.
	I thought gay people were supposed to be good with aesthetics, said a British Columbia content person.
	The design was so poorly received, it was featured on Not the Bee due to its almost satirical nature.
	Well, that's just it.
	You know, they, again, no matter how ridiculous it is.
	And a good example of that is the furries.
	And a lot of people don't realize that the first time the furries, they've been going on for quite some time.
	It hasn't been protected in schools until recently.
	But it's been around for quite some time.
	As a matter of fact, it was almost a decade ago that there was a very famous furry convention.
	So they've been going on for quite some time before that.
	Then they had the, they called it Rain Forest 2015.
	And it was the first time that anybody really noticed the furries because of the amount of destruction that they did to the hotel where they had their convention They had an orgy of sex of violence of destruction. You had diaper clad adults dressed as cuddly animals And they completely trashed the hotel. It was meant to be an annual convention designed for and by furries But the debauchery that ensued left animal loving
	organizers banned from ever holding another event in the city of seattle After a brass at the hotel, they said they defiled a spread word about what happened at the social gathering Permanently plastered in the annals of internet history, the event started to go off the rails when someone purposely loosened a bolt on the Hilton Seattle Airport and Conference Center's toilets, causing it to flood instantly.
	The floor was soon filled with two inches of putrid toilet water.
	The first sign hosts had overestimated the wholesomeness of their guests and that everything was going out of control.
	Things only got worse from there as attendees indulged in drink and drugs that eventually gave way to destruction.
	A series of arrests ensued as attendees donned diapers and even went so far as to defecate in a pool.
	A hot tub was also flooded when a person shoved towels into the pump, filling it with water, and the hotel was left in ruins.
	After receiving a bill for $100,000 in damages, organizers would eventually issue a cryptic statement as to why the event was called off permanently.
	And yet here we are, a decade later, and this is protected activity in schools.
	That was the thing when I looked at it.
	We had dress codes when we were in school, Karen and I. And if you were outside the dress code, you were disruptive and you were sent home or whatever.
	And how in the world do we get to the point where, you know, wearing a particular type of dress or something else was disruptive to everybody, but now wearing these furry costumes, which is obviously disruptive.
	They're engaging in crazy behavior.
	They're chasing and attacking other students.
	They come in with these mittens that have claws on them.
	They're scratching and hurting other students.
	We have this enabling institution that's been taken over from the top, the government schools, that is allowing this kind of nonsense.
	It's no wonder that we have this.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk about the insurance companies.
	As I mentioned at the beginning of the program, We're now seeing two back-to-back reports.
	I haven't seen anybody combine these two, but we had one last week that I talked about.
	I think it was on Friday, Thursday or Friday.
	And it was a pediatrician that was interviewed by Children's Health Defense Fund.
	And he talked about how much money was a pediatrician would get for vaccinating kids.
	As a matter of fact, you couldn't really have a profitable practice without it, because the insurance company would punish you.
	The insurance company would reward or punish you based on whether or not you had achieved their goal of 80% of the students being vaccinated with everything.
	How did we get to that point?
	Bill Gates had his immunization agenda 2030 and everybody everywhere every age vaccinated.
	And now we've got another report that comes out.
	This is from Dr. Peter McCullough, showing the same thing happening not with the childhood vaccines, but with the COVID vaccines.
	And so we're going to talk about how in the world did we get to a situation where the insurance companies are financially rewarding and punishing people.
	For whom are they doing it?
	Based on whether or not they get their patients vaccinated.
	We'll be right back.
	Welcome to the World of Music.
	Welcome to the World of Music.
	Bye.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Rumble, Superfe, good to see you there.
	He said, I remember getting in trouble and sent home in seventh grade for wearing a jacket when the teacher thought it was inappropriate for the temperature.
	Yeah. What has happened to the schools?
	Well, as I pointed out last week, I talked about the interview that Children's Health Defense had with a pediatrician, Dr.
	Paul Thomas. He said, we get paid to vaccinate your children.
	That was a headline. And it truly was amazing.
	I think it was Friday I talked about this.
	But here's what he said.
	He said, we make money three different ways off of vaccines.
	He said the first one is the administrative fee.
	He described that as a thank you for giving the shot.
	He estimated that pediatricians typically receive about $40 for the first antigen and $20 for each subsequent antigen.
	He said, let's say that you've got a two-month-old well-baby visit.
	And there's DPI, that's three shots, and that's three antigens, right?
	And so even though, you know, and then he said you've got influenza type B, you've got Prevnar, which is pneumococcal and hepatitis B, polio, rotavirus. So it goes all together, that's $240, right?
	He said the second way is we make a little bit of money but not much as a markup on the vaccines themselves.
	But the key place, the third way they make money, and this is the key way that they make money, the third and most substantial financial incentive, he said, is what they call quality bonuses, and that comes from the insurance companies.
	The insurance companies offer pediatricians bonus payments for meeting certain benchmarks, typically around 80% of patients being fully vaccinated by age 2.
	Now this has been going on for quite some time.
	And as I've said before, we knew exactly what was going on in 2020, those of us who've been covering this, because we had seen what they were doing with the childhood vaccines, because we knew what had happened with the dark winter simulations and the germ games that they were practicing lockdown and then forcing, coercing people to have an experimental vaccine that they'd rushed to market.
	And then, of course, they were also running the annual flu shot thing, which just looked very much like the annual flu fear campaign.
	You know, fear and jab, fear and jab, that type of stuff.
	So all those things combined.
	This is all these different aspects were there.
	They ran this thing all the time.
	But the interesting thing I find is how this is being run through the insurance companies.
	And understand that most medical practices live and die by the insurance company.
	I mean, they have to have, as he's talking about his overhead, he said, I've got so many.
	He had a lot of patients.
	He had to have a lot of staff.
	He had 15,000 patients.
	He had 33 staff members.
	And a large number of those, I'm sure, were there to process insurance payments because they don't just pay the first time that you send them something.
	You know, they're constantly, you know, questioning this and questioning that and disallowing this, and you've got to fight with them and that type of stuff, and follow up to make sure they send the payments.
	It's a big expense.
	And so we've had doctors that we used that didn't do insurance, and we looked for them because we didn't have insurance.
	We chose not to have insurance.
	We chose to use one of these medical sharing plans, and you go in, tell them I'm a cash patient, and we found And I'd already read an article way before Obamacare was pushed through that talked about, as in the L.A. Times,
	they said... Gave examples of people who went in to have something done, and they gave them discounts if they paid cash, but, you know, the people who had insurance, they had a really good insurance plan because they're an employer or whatever, but they had to pay, you know, 20% or 10% or whatever.
	They said the people who had insurance wound up, and the part that they had to pay, the 10 or 20% they had to pay, was more than what the cash patient paid.
	And one of the reasons for that was that there were a lot of unnecessary procedures.
	Which, by the way, I've had a lot of family members harmed by unnecessary diagnostic procedures.
	You can be harmed by that.
	You know, we went that way and we found doctors, family practice doctors, said, we only deal in cash.
	I'm not going to handle, I'm not going to go through the hassle of having an insurance company.
	And you may want to look for somebody like that because what you are now seeing is the fact that the insurance companies were bribing the doctors to vaccinate the kids with everything before the age of two.
	You do that, we're going to give you a lot of money.
	Is that reprehensible?
	Isn't it reprehensible that Trump was doing that with the lockdown stuff?
	Don't you find that reprehensible? I do find that reprehensible.
	I find it reprehensible that he was financially rewarding the hospitals to kill people with their medical murder profile.
	And I find it abhorrent that these insurance companies are doing the same thing with the pediatricians to harm kids because it is harmful.
	And then we find that they've actually done this with COVID as well.
	But before we leave this, he said, the pediatrician said, I would get dinged maybe 10 to 15% off of this stuff because the relative value units, in other words, they would reduce what they paid him in insurance because he didn't get all of his patients vaccinated.
	And he gave his patients an option.
	He said, well, here's what I say about vaccines.
	You have an option. I'll give you all the vaccines, or you can do them on your own timing.
	Oh, no, they've got to have all of them done right up front, all in a cluster before the kid turns two.
	So even if they got all the vaccines, but they didn't do it on the compressed warp speed device, Time frame.
	Well, then that didn't qualify either.
	And he would get harmed by the insurance company.
	And then some people didn't want to get him at all.
	And he said, okay, that's fine.
	I won't give them to you. But what he found was that his vaccination rate was only 1%.
	And that cost him 15% of his revenue.
	That's enough to put you out of business.
	He says, really, it effectively means that a pediatric practice cannot survive using insurance...
	Without doing most of the vaccines, if not all of them.
	And he said, and I think that explains why doctors have the blinders on.
	Why they don't want to go there.
	They don't want to look at it, right?
	They know that these vaccines are causing a lot of harm, but they also know that that's what pays their bills.
	So they sell out. The love of money is the root of all evil.
	Somebody said that once. Yeah, that's right.
	Jesus, I think, said that, didn't he?
	Yeah. Yeah, and then they talk a little bit about sudden death, sudden infant death syndrome, which now we have sudden adult death syndrome, and I played that clip of the woman who realized that that was what killed her child 40 years ago, nearly.
	He's doing very well now.
	So that was a pediatrician talking about this long-term process of childhood vaccines, which, you know, when Fauci becomes head of the NIH in 1986, it was right after he became head.
	He became head in like 1985 or something like that.
	In 1986, he gets Ronald Reagan to sign the legal immunity for the pharmaceutical company so that you can't Sue them.
	You go to arbitration, and most people are not compensated anything if they get something.
	They don't get what they should be getting.
	But, of course, it was explained that if we don't protect the vaccine companies, they'll be put out of business because of product liability stuff.
	Well, you know, that's the whole point of the legal system.
	You should put people who are making harmful, dangerous products out of business.
	They either reform themselves or they go out of business.
	That's what it's for. But they gave them legal immunity.
	If you realize that, then you understand what a scheme and what a corrupt practice this is.
	You understand how the government has been completely captured by this industry that it supposedly regulates.
	Now we have Dr. Peter McCullough reveals how much doctors got bribed to push COVID shots.
	And he's got the paperwork.
	Leaked insurance documents back him up.
	The insurance companies are juicing the system.
	This is from Gateway Pundit.
	You can see a screenshot of the documents there.
	Dr. McCullough claimed that a typical doctor could make an extra $250,000.
	If they injected a substantial portion of their patients.
	More specifically, if a doctor injected 75% of his or her patients at $250 per newly injected person, that would end up being around $250,000.
	This comes from a leaked document from Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield.
	A leaked document from that insurance company.
	Now, think about that.
	You know, it's absolutely astounding the amount of money that the hospitals are making under Trump's rules.
	And, you know, as I said before, you know, $13,000 for identifying somebody as COVID. $39,000 if you get them sick enough to put them on a ventilator and kill them.
	And then they pay a 20% bonus on everything that you do while they're there.
	And then these doctors, think about it.
	Trump paid for the research and development.
	He paid for the manufacturing.
	He delivered the stuff for free.
	And then they set up a schedule here where the doctors who injected 75% of their patients could make about $250,000 for doing that.
	This is the power and the corruption of our fiat currency.
	And it would be a blessing in disguise.
	It is that ability to create this fiat currency out of thin air that is the basis of their power and their tyranny.
	They pay everybody behind the scenes to do criminal things.
	They have the military-industrial complex makes money off of these weapon systems.
	We fund both sides of every war.
	We give vast sums of money to the pharmaceutical companies to develop the stuff.
	We protect them from any liability.
	They deliver it.
	They reward and bribe hospitals and doctors to push all of these products on people.
	And to charge exorbitant prices, you look at Remdesivir, $3,000 for a treatment?
	It costs nothing to make that garbage.
	And it is poison.
	And so, this is the document from Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield.
	How you can qualify for a bonus.
	And so...
	It says, if your practice meets the below thresholds, pull this up, Travis, and show this document as I'm reading it.
	If your practice meets the below thresholds for vaccination with at least one dose by September the 1st, 2021, that was when they claimed that they were going to authorize it legally here, you'll receive the initial incentive payment based on the following rates.
	30% Anthem members vaccinated.
	You get a $20 bonus per vaccinated member.
	If you get 40% of them vaccinated, you get a $45 bonus per vaccinated member.
	And so the amount that you get per member starts to go up significantly based on the percentage that you get vaccinated.
	So at 30% vaccinated, you're going to get $20 bonus per vaccinated member.
	At 75% of them vaccinated, you will get $125 bonus per vaccinated member.
	That's why he worked it out. He said, well, a typical practice has got this many patients.
	That's about $250,000 if you get 75% of them vaccinated.
	And remember what the pediatrician said?
	He said you've got to get around 80% of the kids vaccinated up to the age of two.
	The article, if you're having trouble finding it, Travis, is cardiologist reveals how much doctors got bribed.
	Okay, I want people to see that table there.
	The final incentive, yes, scroll down.
	There you go. The final incentive payment is calculated based on members who are newly vaccinated between September the 1st, 2021 and December 31st, 2021.
	This is when they said it's approved.
	It's fully approved.
	No longer emergency use authorization.
	We've now approved Corbinati, which is not available in the United States.
	Playing that legal game as well.
	And so again, with that one, the numbers go up significantly.
	At the lower end, pull it up, you got 30% of the people vaccinated.
	You get a $100 bonus, not $20 before, right?
	And because they want everybody to get vaccinated right there in September.
	So they're going to have a real big push.
	They're actually going to pay them more after they've said that it's safe and authorized than they did when it was emergency use.
	Isn't that interesting? Yeah.
	So it goes from $20 to $100 if you get 30% of your patients vaccinated.
	You really push this stuff. Sell it.
	This is like a multi-level marketing scam, isn't it?
	And then you've got 75% of your members vaccinated.
	You get a $250 bonus per patient instead of $125.
	So five times the amount on the lower end of 30%.
	And if you get 75% or more, You get double what you would have gotten at the high end.
	Instead of $125 per patient, you get $250 per patient.
	They're really pushing that in the third and fourth quarter of 2021.
	That's why we see the insurance companies out there, One America, saying, you know, we had, this is like a once in every 200 year event.
	This is more than three standard deviations away from the mean.
	These people live and die by the actuarial tables and by the percentages.
	That is an exact science.
	And so they looked at this and said, this makes no sense.
	And furthermore, these people are dying not from COVID. It's third and fourth quarter of 2021.
	They're not dying from COVID. Oh.
	Are they dying from the vaccine?
	Oh, can't be that.
	We know that it has to be COVID, said the insurance company.
	One America, the insurance company CEO. We know it has to be COVID. And we know this as well, that nobody dies from COVID if they get the vaccine.
	And so it has to be unvaccinated people.
	So we'll charge them more on their insurance.
	So the question is, why the insurance companies?
	And what is the leverage that they have over these insurance companies?
	That's what I want to ask. When I look at these two articles, one of them is a long-term ongoing program of bribing and blackmailing doctors to get all the kids vaccinated with a pediatric program.
	The second one is rolling out the same program, essentially, but with bigger numbers for COVID. To do everybody, of every age.
	Again, Bill Gates, immunization agenda, 2030.
	Everyone, every age, everywhere, vaccinated.
	With everything, presumably.
	And so, why, you know, what is the insurance?
	We know that coming behind it, you know it's got to be the government, right?
	You know, it's the government that is printing out money out of thin air and bribing these insurance companies and also blackmailing them.
	And I don't think that it is a coincidence this is happening after Obamacare was put in.
	Because remember, there was a big fight as to whether or not the government was going to become the insurer, whether they were going to get rid of all private insurance whatsoever.
	And I think the reason that the Democrats didn't do it It's because they're fundamentally not communist.
	They're fascists.
	They like to merge private companies with their authoritarian, totalitarian goals.
	The same thing when Hitler was talking about the difference between his national socialists and Stalin's Soviet socialists.
	And he said, well, you know, Stalin and his communists, they seize all of the industry and they run it and they don't know how to run it that well.
	He says, what we do, Hitler said, we will control the individual companies, but we'll leave the people in charge who know how to run it.
	We'll leave them in charge, but we will effectively control what they do for our purposes, and then eventually we'll cut their throats and we'll take over the thing.
	But that's after we have used them to do what we want to do.
	And that's what they're doing with Obamacare, I believe.
	Now, this is my opinion.
	I strongly believe that what's happening here is that when this whole thing is being pushed through back in 2013, there's this big fight as to whether or not they're just going to shut down all health insurance and they will be the insurance company.
	But I think they decided that it's much more effective if they use them and they have plausible deniability on this.
	They can control them even more effectively because these people know how to run an insurance program.
	They hire a bunch of bureaucrats who've never had any experience in it.
	They wouldn't be able to run the insurance program.
	So let these people who know how to do it run it, and we'll completely control them with money.
	Somewhere in the background, the federal government is paying this money, just like they paid for every bit of this.
	Trump and Biden paid for every bit of it.
	Somewhere they're doing it, and they're using this as plausible deniability, but they're paying for it.
	This government is so incredibly subversive.
	They hide everything they do behind layers and mirrors and misdirection and all the rest of this stuff.
	Even when you show the memos about censorship or something, oh, well, we're just going to ignore it, and then they continue to do it.
	And so, again, this is more of the pattern that we see all the time from our government, the financial bribes and blackmail, which they're able to do with this fiat currency.
	May God destroy it.
	Whatever it costs us, it is not worth it to create this monstrous thing called the American government that uses it for war, for democide, for all the rest of this stuff.
	There's absolutely nothing that could justify any cost that it costs us in our lives could not be justified by what this government does with this money and how they abuse that power.
	And they're about to, you know, I think they perhaps have shot themselves in the foot with this Ukrainian stuff and these Russian sanctions, and people realize how it's being weaponized against other governments, and they've had enough of it.
	But it's always the money, and it's always done secretly, and it's always done, I'll give you this incentive, or I will punish you if you don't do it.
	And I think that this really explains this nonsense of this One America CEO of that insurance company who just humiliated himself.
	As an idiot. He doesn't believe that.
	Nobody believed that. Everybody looked at that and laughed.
	Seriously? You're gonna... Well, I know that these people couldn't have died from what they put down on the...
	You know that everybody was being incentivized to call everything COVID, and when it wasn't COVID, you still now want to call it COVID? And now you want to charge unvaccinated people more because you said they wouldn't have died?
	I know it's COVID, and I know that it's got to be unvaccinated people.
	He just throws all that away.
	Now, they're trying to hide this.
	So here's the, you know, we've got the vaccine pay-to-inject program that is coming from the government, is there.
	And now we have an insurance company, trade organization.
	It's the Actuarial Society's research arm.
	You know, the people who come up, this is what makes them profitable or not profitable.
	The actuarial tables.
	You know, Warren Buffett said to his, as he addressed his stockholders, he goes, you know, he's 90-something.
	He said, well, I'm feeling really good.
	I'm hoping that I'm going to be here next year.
	He goes, but we should be talking about who takes over the reins after I'm gone, because Charlie Munger, his partner of Long Term, had just recently died, I think, in the last year.
	He was in his 90s. And he said, you know, I'm feeling really good, but I know the actuarial tables because he made a lot of money in the insurance stuff.
	And that's what it's all based on.
	It's based on probabilities and statistics.
	And if they don't get the actuarial tables right, they're out of business.
	And so this is what they do.
	This is how they make their money.
	It's how they make a lot of money by really understanding these actuarial tables.
	So the Actuarial Society's research.
	Depicted a huge surge in non-COVID deaths, just like, you know, one America talked about, in young insured workers.
	And now, after this was put out, and it was available for everybody to see it, and people started saying, oh, another one of these cases showing that this was a massive kill-off, this vaccine thing.
	Well, the Society of Actuaries pulled it back Behind a firewall.
	And you have to pay $10,000 to see this data now.
	This is very much like Pfizer and the FDA saying, we want to hide all this information that, you know, we had about the vaccines.
	We want that hidden for 75 years.
	You got nothing to hide here?
	You see? Yeah, censorship is always a crime.
	Or it is always covering up a crime.
	Free speech is never a crime.
	It's the censorship that's a crime, or the censorship that is covering up a crime.
	The Society of Actuaries has put up a five-figure paywall, $10,000, to be able to access new reports on COVID mortality that in the past revealed shocking rates of above-normal and excess deaths.
	In a post to its website, the Society of Actuaries, a national source of risk data for life insurers, said that it will charge $10,000 for four updates of post-pandemic deaths through next February.
	Quote, this new series of group life mortality quarterly reports and data are only available for purchase, said their communications manager.
	Previous reports which showed young workers dying at a far higher excess rate than senior citizens is still available on their website, he said, and new, less technical ones will be released to the public at an unspecified time.
	Some industry watchers suggested that the non-profit society whose members pay dues may be trying to develop a new business model.
	Yeah, right. Somehow the government's got its fiat hooks into them somewhere.
	It also may be attempting to extract itself from the contentious and politically charged issue of excess deaths and what is causing them.
	Yeah. In other words, a cover-up.
	Maybe they were told to cover it up.
	Just like this One America insurance guy, you know, starts talking about it.
	This is crazy. And then, you know, he retracts it with a ridiculous explanation.
	The society's primary job is to help insurers set rates based on the likelihood of injury and death.
	An indisputably technical and costly task.
	But because it is considered to be an unbiased source of trend information, its reports have also helped define the pandemic toll on working-age insured people who got the jab.
	While the Society of Actuaries has the right to use its reports as it sees fit, their loss would be a blow to pandemic information.
	Another example of the government wanting to shut this stuff down.
	In six articles published in mainstream venues, Dr.
	Pierre Corey, President Emeritus of the FLCCC Alliance, and I have used Society of Actuary findings to call attention to the unheralded problem of excess deaths in America.
	In the first nine months of 2023, 158,000 more Americans died than normal, 50 times the toll of the World Trade Center attacks, and more than every U.S. military conflict since the Vietnam War.
	In early 2023, a seminal Society of Actuaries report revealed a wave of deaths in the third quarter of 2021 among insured people under 45 that was 80% above the norm before the pandemic.
	At the same time, deaths among people 65 and older were 16% higher, defying common wisdom that older people were more vulnerable And younger people, more robust.
	And again, that was the same data where that one guy at One America was saying, yeah, we've never seen anything like this.
	This is outside the norm.
	We don't expect to see this kind of, you know, black swan event or whatever, but once every 200 years.
	And then we have this video talking about the bribery, talking about the murder.
	In the history of humanity, on that first 10 weeks, there were 42,086 casualties, including 1,223 dead on page 7.
	Listen, this is the most lethal and injurious drug ever rolled out, and if you calculate the injured to kill ratio, it's unprecedented in warfare and medicine.
	The injured to kill ratio of that first 10 weeks was 33.4.
	What does that mean, Alice? That means for every person ill, There's 33.4 times that injured, and many of these are severe injuries.
	And then on page 12 of that document, it details the outcome of women who were pregnant.
	Pregnant women weren't even supposed to be receiving this.
	So it was a horrible catastrophic outcome.
	There was an 81% miscarriage.
	There was a five-fold increase of fetal death.
	There was an eight-fold increase in neonatal deaths.
	And there were major breastfeeding complications in those babies whose mothers received the vaccine.
	Now, what did the federal government, what did Biden do with that?
	What did the...
	Chief Executive Director, Chief of Staff, Jeffrey Zients, Vivek Murthy, the Surgeon General, then head of the NIH, Francis Collins.
	What did they do with that, Alex?
	Did they tell the American people what Pfizer's own data showed?
	No. They tried to hide it for 75 years, but it was immediately available from a whistleblower.
	And thank God that Aaron Seary and ICANN, the Informed Consent Action Network, 15 months later, it was revealed to the public, ironically, on April Fool's Day 2022.
	So that's a first source of document that we'll...
	Yeah. Yeah, how about that?
	Yeah, we knew that, didn't we?
	We knew that before this document came out.
	As a matter of fact, we knew right away in January while Trump was still president.
	People were dropping dead.
	We don't want to blame Trump, though.
	I mean, that's Alex interviewing this guy, so he knows better than to put anything at Trump's door.
	It's all Biden's fault, right?
	No, the two of them are there.
	They're partners in crime.
	It's a professional wrestling tag team.
	And I'm increasingly concerned that just as they want to put the vaccinations into the food, because people are on to that, that they want to use Trump.
	They'll probably have, if they put him in, and again, whoever becomes president will be selected, will be installed.
	And so if they put Trump in, he'll probably do everything that everybody wants for the first year to get his credentials up.
	And then you watch out.
	Just like in the first term, two, three, four years down the road, he will implement whatever the globalists want to do.
	As a matter of fact, you know, just...
	Just a reminder of what we all knew that Trump was going to save us, right?
	Very weak, attenuated, classic viruses with a very low amount of adjuvant in it.
	Trump's looking at basically sugar water for folks.
	Can we take a little bit of an attenuated, microwaved or radiated COVID deal?
	Absolutely. That's why Trump is taking control of the process.
	Yeah, that's right. So, you know, there you go, Jonestown.
	Inject the Kool-Aid.
	Absolutely inject the Kool-Aid. We got a comment from Handy on Rockfin.
	He goes, that explains it.
	100% of the time, the ER nurse that triages my pediatric patients, again, Handy does EMS, and he has a substack as well.
	He said, 100% of the time, the ER nurse that triages my pediatric patients asks the parents if they would like their child to get a flu shot.
	While they're there in the ER. Even when the child is there for cold, flu, and fever, they ask for that.
	I see it happen all the time because I'm with the patients when they're triaged.
	They will also arbitrarily mark you as COVID plus still.
	I watched a nurse check the box during triage once.
	I've seen five co-workers disappear post-jab mandate.
	One had a stroke at 35.
	The rest of them dropped dead suddenly.
	Folks, it's pure on murder.
	And this partisan stuff, it's Biden, Biden, Biden, Biden.
	Yeah, Biden is absolutely responsible for it.
	But so is Trump.
	And so are both Republicans and Democrats in the House and the Senate.
	They do nothing to stop it. They have done everything to cover it up. As a matter of fact, Rand Paul coming after Fauci.
	Oh, what about this Wuhan thing?
	Misdirection. Red herring. You're gonna make people vaccine hesitant, Dr. Fauci. Shame on you. Who does Rand Paul work for?
	These people are for sale. It doesn't matter if it's Big Pharma or if it's Big Israel. They're gonna sell you out.
	They're gonna kill you, get you involved in a war.
	They're going to inject their Kool-Aid from Jonestown into your arms, telling you it's sugar water.
	It's unbelievable what these people will do, whether you're talking about the politicians or the commentators like Alex.
	So again, folks...
	If you like the broadcast, please like the stream.
	We have a difficult time getting out there.
	It's getting more difficult all the time.
	We're going to talk, though, when we come back, a little bit about some news about gold and silver that is very positive.
	Interesting that it's happening, and a lot of different states are doing this.
	And we're going to talk about that when we come back.
	Stay with us.
	♪♪
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, Nebraska has just joined the list of states that have ended, not just sales tax, they've ended income taxes on gold and silver.
	The feds will still charge you if you make a profit, still tax you on that gain.
	Nebraska now will give that back to you, you know, and so they have also declared that CBDCs We're good to go.
	Thereby removing them from the calculation of the Nebraska taxpayers' state income tax.
	Again, I hate state income taxes.
	I've only lived in one state.
	Of course, we were in North Carolina most of my life, but they had a state income tax.
	But grew up in Florida and worked in Florida.
	Well, of course, there is also an inflation tax, you see.
	This is what they're really talking about.
	If you sell this, and it's what we see with homes, we see this with businesses.
	It's one of the reasons why the Republicans in the past have argued against an estate tax, against death tax, for example.
	You have a small family business, typically a farm or something like that, and the head of the household dies, whose name it was in.
	And They assess a tax based on the gain that is there.
	And that gain is probably not a real gain.
	It is probably just inflation, just like when you look at a house.
	And the house costs many, many times more than what somebody paid for it 30 years ago when they die.
	It isn't that the house is worth more.
	It's that the dollar is worthless or totally worthless.
	And so what they're doing is they're taxing you on inflation that they created.
	How they devalued your currency and say they're giving you a tax to pay on that mismanagement of the dollar.
	As the dollar falters, gold becomes insurance, not speculation.
	This is from the Mises Institute.
	And I think that's the right way to look at it.
	You know, that's why I said, you know, I'm not, I'm sure if I timed it right, I could probably make a lot of money on crypto and Bitcoin, things like that, but I never time it right.
	So, and I'm not interested in getting on a roller coaster because that becomes speculation.
	I look at gold because it is insurance.
	Economics trumps sentimentality, says the Mises Institute, and gold's elevated price has some people raiding the family jewelry box in order to pay their bills.
	So some people are trying to take advantage of a higher gold price by selling into it.
	You know, it's interesting because the Fed is doing the same thing.
	The Fed is keeping interest rates high.
	The Fed is trying to suppress the price of gold and other people are taking advantage of the price and yet it's staying firm.
	Because other people in other countries are, I think, wiser about this.
	People are using gold as an ATM that they never had.
	So they got some jewelry or something like that, they're selling it, they said.
	But it turns out that a lot of the people, I thought this was interesting, in this article from Mises Institute, they said, turns out that more than a few of those well-publicized Costco gold bar buyers are having trouble selling them.
	Because they were doing, what, something like $100,000 or something, maybe more per month.
	I forget what it was. It was incredible, the amount of money that they were doing, maybe a million dollars or something.
	The bars are not American Eagles or other similar gold coins, and so they're not as liquid, given that the seller, Costco, will not buy them back.
	Now, that's the most interesting thing.
	Costco will not buy back the stuff.
	Anything that Tony Arterman sells, he'll also buy it back.
	That's typically what happens with these gold dealers, but Costco is not doing that.
	They're not going to buy back the gold bars.
	The Wall Street Journal says 33-year-old Adam Shi called five different gold dealers to get a price that he would accept for the gold bar that he bought at Costco in October.
	He was offered $200 less by one dealer than the original $2,000 that he had paid.
	But he found a Philadelphia coin dealer near his home willing to pay $19.60 or $20 under market price.
	He has learned or should have learned that buying gold to turn a quick profit is a fantasy.
	His plan was to rack up credit card points, buy the gold, and then quickly resell it for a profit.
	Buying physical gold is purchasing insurance against monetary mischief by the Federal Reserve.
	It is not to earn a profit via a quick flip.
	That's the point. It's the Mises Institute saying that.
	Now, they're not buying or selling any of this stuff.
	They're economists.
	They're looking at this. This is your insurance against the Federal Reserve.
	During the peak of its 2008 hyperinflation, Zimbabwe experienced a catastrophic economic downturn characterized by the issuance of a billion and trillion dollar banknotes.
	And I showed you Jack Lawson, who was in Zimbabwe at the time.
	He has one of those trillion dollar banknotes that were, despite their nominal enormity, Virtually worthless.
	Even though it was a trillion dollar note, it had absolutely no value.
	Reportedly, the ZIG, the Zimbabwean gold-backed thing, is backed by a basket of precious metals, including about two and a half tons of gold, along with $100 million of foreign currency reserves held by the central bank.
	But nobody really believes that Zimbabwe is going to be honest about that.
	I mean, look at the United States.
	You look at what they did with Bretton Woods.
	The reason we had Bretton Woods 2 was because Bretton Woods 1, right after World War I, they were going to make the U.S. dollar the reserve currency because it was going to be backed by gold.
	But guess what? Everybody realized that they were scamming the system.
	Do you think Zimbabwe is going to be any better?
	And the big problem is, is that even if these people were honest, they don't really know how it works.
	This is a highly irregular procedure.
	Once they inflate it...
	I can't come back!
	I don't know how it works!
	Yeah, we lived through that in the late 1970s.
	They inflated the balloon.
	It took off.
	I was racing to the sky.
	It was like, wait a minute, wait a minute.
	Turn it down. Tell the Fed to get control.
	I can't. I don't know how it works.
	That's right. That's the way it goes.
	The world's oldest central bank keeps sounding alarms on the fragility of cashless economies.
	Digital money, right?
	Yeah, you see, gold is not just an insurance against that kind of inflation.
	Gold is insurance against this cashless economy.
	Panopticon surveillance state that they want to put in with CBDC. In Sweden, this is the Swedish central bank.
	It said in October last year, in a report that these authors, this is from Naked Capitalism, The report was, In more good news for cash in Europe, more bad news for the digital dollar in U.S., we reported that recent developments suggested the trend away from cash and towards purely digital-only payment systems may not be quite as smooth or as seamless as some may have wished or expected.
	One of the developments we highlighted in that report was a growing concern among central bankers and politicians in Sweden, one of Europe's most cashless economies.
	They were concerned about the unintended consequences.
	What unintended consequences?
	Well, even by late 2020, Sweden had less cash in circulation than just about any other country in the world at about 1% of gross domestic product, according to the latest available data.
	That compares with 8% in the United States and more than 10% in the euro area in general.
	But now the country is beginning to realize that having almost exclusively digital payment system comes with significant risks, especially at a time of heightened geopolitical tensions.
	People are starting to realize that it's very easy for Vladimir Putin to switch everything off.
	Now we're talking about national security, and it's not only Putin, they said.
	It could also be organized crime that could shut everything off.
	Or, don't mention it, but it could be your own government.
	They're not going to say that.
	The Swedish central bank is not going to say that.
	But they realize that it's extremely vulnerable to cyber attacks.
	In 2021, the Riksbank, Sweden's central bank, and the world's oldest, introduced a new directive obliging the country's six largest credit institutions to continue providing their customers with certain basic cash services.
	But even though they can get the cash out of the banks...
	They can't get the stores to accept the cash.
	That's why it's important for us to use it or lose it.
	We have to use the cash option or we lose that option.
	So a German online news service that covers IT communications and other things talks about the benefits of cash.
	They talk about the fact that cash does not crash as a digital would Cash does not fail in a power cut. It doesn't seize up during a cyber attack though. Of course the ATMs might By contrast digital payment systems need to have a stable and continuous internet connection to process transactions So the digital payments not only leave you vulnerable To tracking and attacks by your own government
	But also leaves the entire system Vulnerable to just being taken down just like that that.
	A lot of reasons not to go there.
	And it's not just the internet connection.
	It's not just the internet being taken down.
	Or they're processing, you know, whatever their hub is, that type of thing.
	It's also just power in general.
	It's just as easy to take down our fragile electric grid.
	As a matter of fact, They have government programs to do just that.
	To the extent that you see these people who are running these surveillance and tracking programs, like Palantir, they're talking about having their own power generating stations.
	Same thing is true of the AI people.
	Same thing is true of some of the crypto miners.
	The electric power grid is also very susceptible.
	Well, we're going to take a break, and when we come back, we're going to take a look at some of the issues.
	Behind me, we've got a screen here.
	Something that looks kind of like what a lot of people were seeing with the solar flares that lit up the sky really far south.
	It's truly amazing. We saw a little bit of it here.
	So we're going to talk about that and its effect on a lot of people were worried about what it was going to do to the internet or to the power grid or to GPS, satellites, or a lot of other things like that.
	We'll talk about that when we come back.
	Stay with us.
	♪♪
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right, so over the weekend we had a large solar storm.
	Maybe you saw it. I was surprised to see that as far down the weatherman was talking about it in Tampa.
	He said, yeah, here's some pictures that I took.
	And there's some pictures that were taken down in Fort Myers, which is even further south.
	But of course, he was saying that you had to have like a time-lapsed camera to see it.
	We're able to see a little bit here with the naked eye.
	People who used cameras got a lot better picture than what we saw.
	But there were a lot of people saying, are you going to do anything?
	Are you going to take any precautions over this?
	He said it was the largest solar storm for 20 years.
	It was expected to happen.
	And of course, the weather guy said, well, we don't really have much experience predicting this.
	And it's like, oh, great. Well, you know, the...
	They don't have much success in predicting the weather either, because they usually miss it by way more than the 1.5 degrees centigrade that they say is going to destroy the Earth.
	I mean, we see that on a given day, you know, just do this.
	If you've got a friend or you're married or whatever, have your friend or your spouse look at temperatures on their phone from a different app, or you can do it on your home phone with a couple of different apps, and you'll see that it's very different.
	When it reports what the temperature is, you'll see the forecasts are very different.
	They'll miss it by five or more degrees many times.
	And so, you know, if they can't predict the solar storm and the effect it's going to have so much.
	But, you know, when they said 20 years, I wasn't born yesterday.
	So I know that, you know, we have a GPS was not as widely used.
	20 years ago as it is now, but still wasn't anything I was worried about.
	But a lot of people talked about that.
	I think really the true issue is not so much even a solar event in this particular, but man-made events that you need to worry about, taking down the Internet or taking down GPS. A major astronomical event took place over the weekend, of course.
	Had the potential to wreak havoc on GPS? The question is, says FreightWaves, This is a trucking trade magazine.
	They said, you know, what effect would this have on trucking if GPS were to go down?
	And so they said, well, you know, what it is, is a lot of charged particles being ejected by the sun.
	They hit the ionosphere, and they inject energy straight into the planet's magnetic field.
	There's satellites that are going to be more directly affected by it.
	It can induce currents into high-voltage power lines.
	That could cause the grid to go down.
	Sometimes it can be accompanied by high energy radiation, which can cause hardware errors on satellites and force them to lose control.
	The thing is, all that can be done as part of cyber warfare, can be done as space warfare.
	You can take down the grid if you are an environmental president like Biden.
	You know, he's like a gremlin who's deconstructing it as we speak.
	Freight Wave said most of the driver population of truckers relies on specific trucking GPS systems that account for weight and height-restricted roads.
	In addition, it helps them to find shippers, receivers, even fuel stops.
	In a worst-case scenario, there would be a supply of chain delays as fleets work around the lack of visibility and drivers would have to go back to reading maps.
	I don't know, maps.
	And it's not just not being used to reading maps.
	It's that, do we even have many maps anymore?
	And are they up to date?
	I mean, when we used maps to go places, it's always the big issue was whether or not the data was up to date or not, you know?
	So since maps have not been used that much, I would be pretty scarce to find one that was current, that really reflected where the roads are today.
	So, yeah, but I think the real issue is not, in this particular instance, it is not natural, but it is man-made.
	Now, when we come to climate, it's exactly the opposite.
	Exactly the opposite. It is the sun that predominates what is happening with climate, as we see with seasons and other things like that.
	But let's talk a little bit about Mother's Day, because Mother's Day happened yesterday.
	And I thought this was an interesting story.
	I didn't know much about this woman, who was the woman behind Mother's Day.
	It turns out that around the 1800s, early 1900s, she got involved in this, around the turn of the century, into the 20th century, she got involved in pushing Mother's Day, which didn't exist at the time.
	She did it after her mother died, but she was not a mother herself.
	I thought that was kind of interesting.
	And after she got Mother's Day passed, she worked the rest of her life to try to stop it.
	Because she didn't like what it had turned into.
	It turned into a very commercial thing.
	And she criticized people for buying, you know, candy and cards and stuff like that for their mothers.
	And so she wanted it stopped.
	They began the story in the Washington Post with an anecdote saying that she went into a restaurant and she ordered a Mother's Day salad.
	And when they brought it to her, she poured it out on the floor in protest.
	She's that kind of a woman, right?
	She was, again, a social activist, a feminist of the turn of the century, end of the 20th century.
	And it's kind of interesting because at that point in time, even though her mother had encouraged her to go to a college and get a degree, she still saw the role of women primarily as motherhood at that point in time.
	And so it was a way of honoring feminism because she was a classic feminist when it came to this stuff, which I think is kind of interesting to see how things have turned upside down.
	You know, we don't honor having children, so why would we honor having mothers?
	We don't understand the importance of the family on raising kids.
	We don't have, as people used to always understand, the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world.
	You have a passing on of values, a multi-generational view.
	All of that is broken by our system that says, well, even the people who are now trying to encourage people to have children, as I was talking about this on Friday, we'll encourage people to have children by giving them money.
	And financially incentivizing it.
	And we'll make an opportunity for them to make it easier for them to give us the kids once they've had them.
	Give us the kids and we'll raise them for you, right?
	Very much like Rumpelstiltskin or something, right?
	Except it's called RFK Jr.
	Who will do that program.
	Yeah, I want your child. Have a child, but give them to me.
	And so they want to raise the children.
	And that's why our society is in great decline.
	So she spent a lot of years fighting to establish Mother's Day about three years after the death of her mother.
	Her mother died in 1905.
	She was about 40 years old at the time, and she decided that her life work was going to be honoring her mother who died.
	She set up the holiday to be as close, you know, the Sunday that was as close as possible to her mother's birthday.
	And so she got all this stuff together.
	She campaigned for years.
	She hectored everybody that was famous.
	She wrote letters to Mark Twain.
	I can imagine what Mark Twain, as cynical as he was, he would have replied if he did reply.
	Theodore Roosevelt, she sent letters to all these different people.
	She finally got it through.
	And then she wasn't happy with what it became.
	She said a printed card means nothing except you're too lazy to write things.
	To your mother. The woman who has done more for you than anyone else.
	Well, I disagree with that.
	I think, you know, you can spend some time and you can find a card that says exactly what you want to say and it can say it in a very beautiful, elegant way and all integrated in there.
	Karen and I, we used to do it.
	Karen did not like to pay a lot of money for greeting cards.
	So she said, come on, it's Christmas time or something.
	Instead of us getting Christmas cards for each other, let's just go to the grocery store and we'll each pick out a card and show it to the other one and we're done.
	So we could do that.
	So it's great having a wife who's that frugal.
	She said, and candy.
	This is the woman who put this through.
	She said, Anna Jarvis, she said, and the candy that you take to your mother, you wind up eating most of it yourself.
	See, she doesn't know that. But that's kind of the grumpy person that she was.
	And she never married.
	She never had kids.
	And she never really understood motherhood from that side of it.
	She paid lip service to motherhood, but she was a childless social advocate, apparently by choice.
	She learned about the childless woman who dedicated her life to the obsessive pursuit of creating a holiday for mothers.
	That's the woman who did the research and wrote the book they're talking about here on Washington Post.
	The surface image of her is that she was this crazy spinster who dedicated her life to the movement and who fought everybody who tried to take her day away from her.
	She would write everybody saying that she was the creator of Mother's Day and then when she didn't like how commercialized it was she wanted to work just as hard to try to take it down.
	So, again, when we look at this, it truly is kind of interesting that she decided to honor something that she didn't want for herself.
	And that this is kind of a portrait that Mother's Day, ironically, was given to us by an early feminist and social activist there.
	So the person who was studying her said Jarvis had a very narrow view of what motherhood was about.
	Hers was the perspective of a child, the perspective of a daughter, who deeply loved her mother, But she didn't understand the importance, really, of the institution, and we understand it even less today, don't we?
	We may honor our individual mothers, but we don't honor motherhood, and we don't honor the family anymore in our countries.
	Real quickly, some legal news updates.
	have a Tennessee appeals court ruled against Tennessee wildlife agents who a few years ago decided they were going to start planting cameras on private land so they could spy on people they thought might be hunting illegally and he had a few people who took them to court this is a reason follow-up they talked about this in December 2022 they said both state and federal wildlife agents routinely trespass onto private land and plant cameras to Tennessee homeowners
	successfully sued the state over the practice and a three-judge panel ruled in their favor under the open fields doctrine the Supreme Court precedent dating back to prohibition holds that undeveloped land on somebody's property lacks the same rigorous Fourth Amendment protections as their home and the curtilage the area immediately surrounding their home
	In March of 2022, a three-judge panel from the Benton County Circuit Court in Tennessee ruled in the favor of the homeowners, finding that the state constitution provided more protections than the U.S. Fourth Amendment.
	And so then the state appealed it.
	You had Attorney Josh Windham argue that the state law was unconstitutionally broad.
	He said it allows the TWRA officers to enter and roam around private land fishing for evidence of a crime.
	And it doesn't require consent.
	It doesn't require warrants.
	It doesn't require probable cause.
	It's a blank check for officers to invade private land whenever and however they please.
	I guess we could say that now, with this court decision, these state agents are not going to be able to go fishing and hunting without a license on your property.
	They're fishing and hunting for you, right?
	And any crimes that you might have committed.
	So I was like, get a warrant before you do that.
	They claimed that homeowners' claims of injury were speculative, they said.
	But the Court of Appeals in Tennessee disagreed.
	They said even if they had not entered the plaintiff's property since 2018, they continue to assert their power to do so.
	The TWRA has asserted a continuing right to enter upon the plaintiff's properties.
	At oral argument, they suggested that if the plaintiffs want to keep the TWRA off of their land in the future, that they should desist in hunting.
	Wow. So that's what we see from these bureaucrats.
	In Alberta, Canada, you have the emergency that Justin Trudeau said, we've got to have gun control because we just had a shooting.
	And so in response to that shooting, he decided that he was going to ban, increase the firearm regulations and effectively grab and confiscate guns on the basis of that.
	And yet, he himself pointed out by his own actions that it's not an emergency.
	It's not going to go into effect until the end of next year, 2025.
	And the state of Alberta, the province of Alberta, has said that they are going to fight against the federal gun grab.
	Unfortunately, what they did was they created an office to fight against the federal government.
	They call it Alberta's Chief Firearms Officer.
	And this woman that they put in charge of that, that they put in charge as the Chief Firearms Officer, says, well, we can regulate, but we can't completely refuse the gun grabs from Trudeau.
	So she's not going to stand in the gap.
	It remains to be seen what is going to happen.
	But it is not an emergency.
	And we see this over and over again, where the government decides that they are going to overthrow the rule of law by simply declaring an emergency.
	As Tom Knighton of Bearing Arms said, of course, Canada doesn't have a Second Amendment.
	There's nothing to limit the government and preserve the right to keep and bear arms.
	But in the wake of this Nova Scotia shooting, Trudeau said it was an emergency.
	It was a situation where a gunman killed 22 people, but he got his guns all illegally.
	So passing more laws isn't going to stop him.
	And by the way, confiscating guns is not going to stop it either.
	They'll be able to get this on the black market.
	Has drug prohibition worked for any of the countries that have tried it?
	Has it really reduced the trafficking of drugs?
	Of course not. What has it increased?
	It has increased, actually, the use and trafficking of drugs because it's made it more profitable for criminals to do it.
	They don't have the same ethics as anybody else.
	So it's become a lot more dangerous on the supply side.
	It has corrupted our police and our courts and our government.
	But it hasn't reduced the use of drugs.
	As a matter of fact, the drugs themselves, as we always see of prohibition, always become more intense.
	As we saw with alcohol prohibition, we've seen with drug prohibition, we'll see that with gun prohibition if they get their way.
	Not only will people be able to get the guns, but the guns will be far more dangerous than they are now.
	Four years later, the ban is still technically in place, but they're not going to do it until at least 2025, and they may kick it down the road as well.
	Trudeau needed an emergency.
	And as I say here, it's why we should never allow a law to be created by fiat.
	And that includes Trump with his bump stock ban, his pistol brace, and his declared emergency about a so-called pandemic.
	So, always, they will use the emergency to overthrow the rule of law.
	Meanwhile, you have an amazing bit of hypocrisy.
	You have Hunter Biden appealing to the Second Amendment to try to stop the charges, gun charges against him.
	Now, considering, I say height of hypocrisy because Joe Biden has spent his entire life trying to destroy the Second Amendment, and here his drug-induced son wants to use it to hide behind him.
	The court said drug users are like people who are mentally ill and dangerous.
	So he says it's not unconstitutional to bar them from having guns.
	He tried to say that, well, under the Second Amendment, you can't say that somebody who is a drug user is not allowed to have a gun.
	Because that's the center of this thing.
	And the court said, well, they are very much like mentally ill people.
	And so, you know, again, his father has supported the drug war.
	His father has supported banning the private use of guns.
	And yet he uses this Second Amendment to hide behind the height of hypocrisy.
	The Supreme Court, by the way, has now declined to set new asset forfeiture standards.
	This is a civil asset forfeiture case.
	Two women in Alabama who had their cars separately.
	They didn't know each other, but two separate cases.
	They came together into one case.
	In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court stood with civil asset forfeiture.
	This is a situation where your property is confiscated without you being convicted.
	Your property is confiscated without you even being charged with a crime.
	Where the presumption of innocence and the due process is thrown away.
	As I say all the time, if you don't do the process when it's due, it's not due process.
	You have to get a conviction first.
	You have to indict somebody, convict somebody, then you can apply the punishment, and then we have protection against excessive punishment as well.
	Listen to this reasoning from Brett Kavanaugh.
	It's absolutely insane.
	In this, he says, hang on a second.
	He says, Congress and the states have long authorized law enforcement to seize personal property and hold it until a forfeiture hearing.
	No, they haven't.
	As long in his life, okay, this drug war stuff has been going on for 50 years, but the civil asset forfeiture wasn't there at the very beginning.
	It was kind of put in by Biden, who was pushing with Reagan to get this thing put in.
	And it's like, has long been authorized?
	Congress cannot authorize what the Constitution prohibits, and the Constitution demands due process.
	What is Brett Kavanaugh talking about?
	He says, in the absence of separate preliminary hearings and civil forfeiture proceedings, he said, we haven't, he says, it's weighty evidence that due process does not require such hearings.
	He said, we haven't had hearings for forfeiture stuff.
	From the founding of this country until the late 20th century.
	Why is that? Well, because the founding fathers would be spending in their graves if they saw civil asset forfeiture.
	Nobody ever imagined that they would do anything like this.
	So he said, what these people were doing, they said, well, it took too long to have a place.
	You confiscated my property.
	Without even charging me with a crime.
	In both of these cases, the mothers, talk about Mother's Day, the mothers owned the car and their kids were driving it.
	The police pulled them over.
	They found marijuana or they found a gun or something like that.
	But rather than charging the kid with a crime, they confiscate the car.
	And so these mothers filed a thing and said, you didn't give us a forfeiture hearing soon enough.
	Well, that's not really the problem.
	And so even though it was a 6-3 decision, Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas said, well, we really need to talk about the root issue here, which is civil asset forfeiture.
	But unfortunately, you had Brett Kavanaugh, and they still voted with a majority, but with that caveat.
	So they had a separate opinion that was consenting with them.
	So you had actually five, you had the three liberal women, Elena Kagan, Brown Jackson and Sotomayor said they dissented against it.
	They didn't like civil asset forfeiture at all.
	And then you have Clarence Thomas and Kavanaugh said, well, we need to really hear the case, but let's go ahead and let this happen because, hey, we don't need to have a speedy trial either.
	This legal system is an unbelievable mess.
	As I've said before, I'll say it again.
	The Supreme Court is like a box of chocolates.
	You never know what you're going to get because they don't know or care what the rule of law is or the Constitution.
	That's it for today's show.
	Thank you for joining us. Let me tell you.
	The David Knight Show.
	You can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	And you want to know something else?

▲