Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 2, 2024 - The David Knight Show

02:32:51

The David Knight Show - 05/02/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Jewish individuals as inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
	So even a theoretical discussion, writes this Zero Hedge article, or interpretation could be considered to be illegal, as it already is in some European countries.
	Matt Walsh said the legislation itself never says what the definition of anti-Semitism is.
	All it says is that the definition is whatever this other group says, what they say, you know.
	It grants the force of law to whatever that organization happens to decree on the subject.
	And, of course, it's not even fixed to whatever they say it is at this point in time.
	What if they change their definition of this?
	By the way, this is what they're about to do with the WHO's international health regulations.
	Well, pandemic is whatever the WHO says it is.
	Anti-Semitism is whatever this Jewish organization says it is.
	So if they say it's anti-Semitism, you're gone.
	If they say it's a pandemic, you're locked down.
	You've got to have your passports, all the rest of this stuff.
	Our government, for the longest time, Congress, has kicked the can to the other side.
	To the bureaucracy.
	So that they don't have to write the laws.
	So we've got laws. We've got regulation without representation.
	Congress is useless at this point, folks.
	And so, because they have kicked this over to the bureaucracy forever now.
	And now they're going to another step.
	Now they are going to kick it to outside organizations.
	So, we're not going to have even, you know, the President with an executive order lock us down declaring a pandemic.
	No, we'll let a foreign organization do it.
	We're not going to have the Congress attack free speech in the name of anti-Semitism.
	They're not even going to give us a definition.
	They'll go to some outside organization for that.
	It's just amazing.
	It kind of reminds me of what Trump did with the gun control stuff.
	It was bad enough that Congress would pass gun control legislation in defiance of the Second Amendment.
	But then Trump did it by executive order.
	Biden and Lala Harris love that.
	It just keeps getting worse.
	Washington is gone, folks.
	So, Marjorie Teller Green says, anti-Semitism is wrong, but I will not be voting for the anti-Semitism awareness act.
	It's not even about awareness.
	I should call it the anti-Semitism punishment act, or whatever.
	Again, it doesn't even have to be anti-Semitism, because something's being defined by this outside group.
	May not be actual anti-Semitism.
	And I've said that for the longest time as well.
	You know, when you point the finger at everybody and say, you're racist, racist, racist, what do you do?
	You give a real pass to the racist people out there.
	Well, they call everybody racist.
	You call everybody racist, nobody's racist, really.
	That's what happens. So the people who are actually racist get off with a free pass.
	So, she said, this could convict Christians of anti-Semitism for believing the gospel that says Jesus was handed over to Herod to be crucified by the Jews.
	Well, that's not the good news.
	The good news is what he gives us.
	But still, when you look at what the Bible says...
	It doesn't simply say that he was crucified.
	Pilate had responsibility for it.
	The Jewish leaders had responsibility for it.
	The Jewish people who said crucify him had responsibility for it.
	But Jesus said, I lay my life down.
	No one takes it from me.
	He voluntarily did that.
	And here's the good news.
	And you know what else?
	We were responsible for his crucifixion.
	He wouldn't have needed to lay down his life if it wasn't for our sins.
	Ask people in all these other religions, what do you do with yourself?
	Well, I just hope for the best.
	I do lots of good work and I hope that it outweighs it.
	Well, you can't ever get right with God after you have rebelled against him.
	The punishment for that is death.
	And the animal sacrifices were a picture of the ultimate sacrifice that would have to be paid for us to get back in God's good graces.
	So, who killed Jesus?
	I did. You did.
	He died for your sins.
	He died for my sins. So, all this stuff about...
	But again, you have people who will use that...
	You know, people attacked Mel Gibson for his movie, said, oh, it's, anyway, they don't understand the gospel.
	Currently and historically, pro-Israel hawks, who advocate for sending billions in American taxpayer dollars to Israel each year, tend to accuse any and all opponents of such policies of being anti-Semitic.
	Some independent journalists say they have struggled to find blatant examples of people being targeted in anti-Semitic attacks on campuses.
	Anybody opposes them on anything.
	They call you racist or anti-Semitic.
	Quite frankly, I don't care.
	Load it up. Call me whatever you want.
	I don't really care. I know what's going on.
	I know what's true. And you can call me an anti-vaxxer, a conspiracy theorist, whatever you want to call me.
	I mean, I will admit to those.
	I'm not racist or anti-Semitic, but I am anti-vaxx.
	And I have lots of, not just even conspiracy theories, I've got a lot of conspiracy facts.
	So, I don't really care about those labels.
	None of us should. So, Matt Walsh again, he says, the vast majority of Republicans just voted for a bill to criminalize criticism of the Israeli government.
	And think about this, folks.
	If they can criminalize criticism of the Israeli government, you think they'll do it with the American government?
	In a sense, they have, right?
	Already, in many different ways.
	If the bill passes, you will be guilty of hate speech if you apply double standards, quote-unquote, to the government of Israel, or if you accuse it of genocide.
	And so, I don't know, is he going to be fired by Ben Shapiro for saying that?
	New York City Mayor Eric Adams surprised me.
	He actually got upset.
	When he saw them waving the flag of another country, he said it's despicable that schools would allow another country's flag to fly in America.
	That they would take down the American flag, they would fly their Palestinian flag.
	Well, you know, I kind of felt that way about Congress, you know, when all these Democrats were waving the Ukrainian flag.
	The Democrats and Johnson wasn't waving it, but he knew it was going to happen.
	I mean, don't tell me that all the Democrats are getting a Ukrainian flag and Johnson doesn't know it.
	They're walking in, they're handing him flags or they're walking in carrying their flags or something.
	He doesn't know it. Is he really that stupid?
	No, he's not that stupid. That's one thing he's not.
	He is very cunning.
	He's not that stupid.
	He knows that they had those flags, and he let that go on for quite some time before you had Chip Roy and others get up there and say, that's a violation of the rules.
	Stop that. And then, of course, that video there was done by Thomas Massey.
	And he had the chief law enforcement, what do they call him?
	Sergeant of Arms, I think. He wanted to fine Massey.
	Not fine the people waving the flags, which is a bit as much a violation protocol as filming the people waving the flags.
	They can do whatever they want.
	If you report their crimes, you committed a crime for reporting them.
	So, yeah, Eric Adams said it was despicable that U.S. schools would allow another country's flag to fly on their campuses while defending the New York Police Department after hundreds of officers in riot gear broke up pro-Palestinian protests on Columbia University's campus.
	And they took down the flag as well.
	So, to me, that was kind of surprising.
	I didn't expect to see Eric Adams defending the American flag.
	So Adams became heated after police showed a number of videos that included protests at Columbia as well as a protest at City College in New York where demonstrators took down an American flag.
	He said another significant part of the video was at the end, said Adams.
	That's our flag, folks.
	You don't take over our buildings and put another flag up.
	That may be fine to other people, but it's not to me.
	I guess it was okay, though, for him when they were removing statues and stuff.
	And quite frankly, it bothers me more to see statues of people who contributed to society, who were not perfect.
	Nobody is perfect. But if they moved us in a major direction towards liberty, had some major accomplishments, and we honor them, that's what these people are tearing down because they want to tear down our society.
	They want to take us back into the Stone Ages.
	They want to level everything so they can reconstruct their socialist revolution.
	And we've now got these leaders of this movement saying that on campus.
	Now, we have to destroy everything so we can have our Marxist revolution.
	They're actually saying that. I've got a recording of it.
	I'm going to play for you here in a minute. But, you know, when they remove these statues, you know, the flag is a political enemy.
	Enemy. Entity, I should say.
	And it is now a political enemy.
	Freudian slip there. Yeah, that's right.
	Trump has accepted the invitation to speak at the Libertarian Party.
	That should be interesting.
	Let's see what his reception is going to be.
	I don't know what they're going to do.
	I know what would have happened when I was there.
	Of course, the Libertarian Party has changed.
	I haven't changed, but the Libertarian Party has.
	But the way it was identified, most of these articles are identified as Libertarian Party.
	And then I saw one of them.
	It was from Raw Story.
	Their headline was, Trump agrees to speak to anti-government group.
	It's like, what? Is that?
	Yeah, that's what they call Libertarian Party, an anti-government group.
	And I thought about it for a second.
	I thought, okay, I'll take that.
	I'll accept that label. I'm anti-vax.
	I'm anti-government.
	I'm a conspiracy theorist.
	I don't really care.
	Those are accurate labels, actually, quite frankly, of me.
	So, it bothers me more to see these statues taken down.
	You think you're perfect?
	You don't think there's anything in your life?
	That is wrong.
	Have you accomplished anything?
	These people that have statues put up for them, most of them made some significant contributions to our society and to our understanding.
	Okay, Jefferson had slaves, but do you understand the other things that he did?
	And do you understand that most of the people, not most of the people, but most of the wealthy people and the people who were in government at the time had slaves, but that blindness in their life does not take away from their warnings and their understandings about power and how it needs to not be centralized.
	And those are the takeaways.
	That and the things like the Bill of Rights that we now despise.
	Quite frankly, I'm more than happy.
	Slavery is gone. And I would like to keep the Bill of Rights.
	But these people want to talk about an institution that's gone so that they can destroy the Bill of Rights.
	And the way they do that is by taking down the statues to the people who wrote the Bill of Rights and other things like that.
	Yeah, they were not perfect, but it bothers me a lot more to see that happen than it does to see a flag taken down.
	Because the flag also represents what our government is today.
	And yes, I am anti-government.
	I despise what both parties are doing today.
	Says Eric Adams, my uncle died defending this country.
	These men and women put their lives on the line.
	It's despicable that schools would allow another country's flag to fly in our country.
	Well, you know, and a lot of the people that they tore down these statues of, a lot of them died.
	Because of what they did as well.
	And they also left a legacy.
	He said, we're not surrendering our way of life to anyone.
	What a joke!
	This is the guy who is destroying private cars and he's allowing crime basically to go unanswered?
	And he's bringing in all the migrants and putting them at the head of the line and giving them the illegal immigrants, giving them more than he does the American citizens.
	Are you kidding me? We're not going to surrender our way of life to anyone?
	He's been one of the key guys pushing the C40 agenda.
	That's surrendering my ability to even eat meat and have milk or travel.
	That's surrendering that to the globalists, and he's a part of that.
	It's so strange to see Eric Adams defending the American flag, and it's equally strange for me to see the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where you've got a fraternity that is defending the American flag.
	That is the last place on earth that I would have expected, except for New York, that I would have expected the American flag to be defended, because we used to live not too far from UNC Chapel Hill.
	Very surprising to me.
	But, you know, it's a bunch of guys in a fraternity, and as the Marxists were coming for the flag, they stood there defending it.
	It went viral.
	They put up a GoFundMe thing.
	Interestingly enough, Bill Ackman, who has been in fights with Harvard over this Gaza-Palestine stuff and everything, he wanted to do a kind of McCarthy blacklisting, just like Mark Levin, of people that he disagreed with.
	He doesn't support free speech.
	But he supports making sure that these people who have signed their name or whatever, wants them kicked out of school, wants them to never have a job working for anybody ever in their life.
	Very McCarthyism, right?
	Blacklisting people for life.
	And, you know, he has an interesting history.
	I haven't talked about it before, but Bill Ackman, Hedge fund manager, he made a fortune shorting the stock market as the lockdowns were about to come, early March.
	And then he goes on TV and makes this emotional plea with President Trump to shut the country down after he's already put in his orders to profit from the plunging stock market.
	Great guy. Great guy.
	I really respect people like him.
	He endorsed Bloomberg, the Democrat, technocrat, the climate terrorist, eco-terrorist, whatever you want to call him.
	That's what Bloomberg is.
	He's an eco-terrorist, I guess, is maybe the best one.
	But he was a big supporter of Michael Bloomberg.
	And he wants McCarthyism against people that he disagrees with.
	Look, I disagree with those people as well.
	But I don't like to see this blacklisting, this cancel culture that's being put out there because it's directed at free speech.
	So, when you look at What Thomas Massey said about this anti-Semitism bill.
	He says, do you agree with all these examples of anti-Semitism?
	And he lists what was put in there.
	You might be an anti-Semitist, or you might be anti-Semitic if you are, you know, it's kind of like, you might be a redneck if you, Foxworthy, remember that?
	Well, you might be anti-Semitic if you do any of these things.
	There's a long list. He puts this up.
	He says, should people in America be prosecuted for saying?
	See, the issue is that nobody in America should be prosecuted for saying anything.
	If they are, we don't have a free country.
	We don't have the Bill of Rights.
	We don't have the First Amendment.
	If you can be prosecuted for saying anything...
	And so the example out of the bill says, well, it could include, but it is not limited to.
	And it's got a very long list here, but of course, it could be anything.
	It includes, but it's not limited to.
	Oh, that's nice. So we still don't know what the boundaries of this are.
	It's a completely open-ended thing.
	It can be things like stereotypical allegations or a myth about a world Jewish conspiracy.
	I say this all the time. George Soros.
	You can't criticize George Soros.
	Why? Because he's Jewish. But he hates the Jewish people, right?
	He's Jewish. So if you criticize George Soros because he's Jewish, you call him a globalist, which he is.
	But since he's Jewish, he gets a pass on that.
	Because we've got this stereotype out there about a global Jewish conspiracy.
	Well, the problem is that that also includes people like Gates, who's not Jewish.
	It includes people like the Rockefellers, who's not Jewish.
	It includes Klaus Schwab, who's not Jewish.
	Yeah, there's a lot of Jews in it.
	But there's a lot of non-Jews in it as well.
	Why don't we look at what people actually do?
	I'm not going to be intimidated by these kinds of labels, and you shouldn't be either.
	We need to push back and resist in the same way that you got even a fraternity at UNC Chapel Hill resisting people taking the American flag.
	Can we resist them taking our First Amendment?
	If you accuse Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide than to the interests of their own nations.
	What if I accuse Congress of being more loyal to other countries than they are to America?
	Waving their flag, sending the money to these other places, and not giving us a penny.
	Instead, allocating three and a half billion dollars for Biden to bring in people from Palestine.
	Do you think that these paid politicians are more loyal to Ukraine and to Israel than they are to America?
	They just proved it!
	A couple of Saturdays ago.
	They proved it! Go look at the bill and tell me that they're not more loyal to foreign governments than they are to us.
	And again, that includes people like Mike Johnson, who are not Jewish, but they are more loyal to them than they are to America.
	And so... It finishes up by saying, anti-Semitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law.
	For example, denial of a Holocaust or distribution of anti-Semitic materials in some countries.
	Or if it's like Andrew Bridgen talking about how many people have been killed by this jab.
	And he was quoting a scientist who said that.
	So the scientists said, it's going to be like that.
	It's like a Holocaust. Oh, you can't say that.
	That's anti-Semitic. It's like, no, it's not.
	That's not even denying the Holocaust.
	Oh, it's got to be separate.
	Look, we know that Stalin and Mao killed more people than died in the Holocaust.
	That's a fact. But, you know, you can't, don't talk about that at all.
	And so you're going to take somebody who is trying to tell us the truth, About this mass murder.
	And that's what the Conservative Party in the UK used to silence and to cancel him.
	You said something about the Holocaust.
	I'm done with this stuff, folks.
	I really am. I am sick to death of people like Johnson, these shills that are up there.
	So, anyway, the...
	When you look at it, and there's a lot of this back and forth from these people about Jesus and his crucifixion and that type of stuff.
	Look, there's no telling where these people are going to use this.
	There's a lot of different ways that they're going to persecute us.
	I think it's even bigger when you look at the tip of the spear.
	It's really not the anti-Semitism charges.
	The tip of the spear is the LGBT stuff.
	Again, going back to USF, you know, police use tear gas on protesters there at USF, where I graduated from.
	And 50 years ago, we had radical Marxists that were there at the time.
	They weren't in engineering.
	They, you know, hung out in other places.
	So, at UCLA... Again, folks, this is not free speech.
	Let me show you what they're doing at UCLA. Look at this.
	Somebody is being beaten. Somebody is being beaten with dick and punches in the middle of the lung.
	Is that free speech?
	Is that free speech?
	Why isn't that the bigger concern?
	At the bottom of that brawl, right there.
	Yeah. Hand-to-hand, melee.
	With sticks and...
	Look at that! Look at that!
	Somebody is being dragged and beaten in the front of that plywood wall.
	Wasn't it Einstein who said the Third World War would be fought with sticks and stones?
	Maybe he's talking about the campuses.
	I don't know. Just incredible.
	Like, where are the police?
	Where is security? Where are these people?
	Yeah. This is LA. Where is authority here?
	Where Daryl Gates gave us the militarized police with their MRAPs and all the rest of this stuff.
	He gave us the SWAT teams.
	He gave us the no-knock raids.
	...never covered without any sign of enforcement, law enforcement, security whatsoever.
	This has gone now on for over an hour and a half.
	And it is absolutely appalling.
	In my estimation, that we have not seen any response.
	I've just never seen it.
	And it goes on and on.
	You know, that's what we saw.
	Daryl Gates, when he was still there, he's not there anymore now.
	He was there in the 90s, 30 years ago.
	But he was the one who gave us SWAT teams and no-knock raids and militarized police and all the rest of the stuff.
	And then when you had the Rodney King riots, what did he do?
	They used all that stuff to protect themselves.
	They circle the wagons around the police stations and let everybody else fend for themselves, which is what they're doing right now at UCLA campus.
	What does that tell you?
	Well, we saw it 30 years ago.
	We see it now. When they get their societal breakdown, folks, you're on your own.
	There's not going to be anybody on the other end of the line coming to help you.
	And so again, you know, think about what you're going to do to prepare.
	What are you going to do to prepare for food?
	Do you want to be dependent on them for food?
	Oh, if so, they're going to put you in a FEMA camp until you've got to be vaccinated and all the rest of this stuff, right?
	So you don't want to be dependent on them for food.
	You don't want to use their financial system.
	You don't want to be dependent on them to protect yourself.
	And so, again, you need to take a look at CivilDefenseManual.com.
	He's got great chapters on so many different things, but especially about building community because you don't want to be by yourself either.
	Massive numbers of people can overwhelm you in any of these situations.
	But it's about how to feed yourself, how to get together in a community, to defend the community, that type of thing.
	And you also want to make sure that you are outside of their financial system.
	Tony Arterman set up DavidKnight.gold.
	And so you go there and you can gradually start to accumulate gold or silver.
	You can get quantity discounts. That's part of that buyer group that he's got.
	The Wolf Pack that's there.
	You can go from $50 on up.
	And actually, he's got a kid's version that goes down to $35 each month.
	Or you can buy gold and silver at any big or small individual purchases.
	It doesn't have to be a part of that.
	He just set that up for people who want to do it on a regular basis.
	Make it a part of their budget.
	And get quantity discounts as part of a buyer's group.
	But he will buy or sell this stuff for people, and he doesn't run out of it like they do at Costco.
	You know, if you place an order, he'll get it for you at that price.
	He places his order, gets a hold on it.
	It may take a little bit of time for it to show up, but he'll get it for you at that price.
	So go to davidknight.gold.
	I really do appreciate Tony's support of this program.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we're going to come back.
	I've got one or two more things to talk about, but I also want to talk about, with this, the campus wars.
	Actually, the wars on free speech.
	But I want to talk about the new regulations.
	Another week, another couple of regulations of things that are going to be banned for you.
	As Biden is making houses more expensive, he's making everything unaffordable.
	He's got more regulations for houses, more regulations for power generation, more regulations for appliances.
	There was an interesting back and forth there.
	The White House reporter asked his press secretary, you know, when does this all end?
	Well, it doesn't until we end it.
	If you like the Eagles, the cars, the Eagles, And Huey Lewis and the News.
	You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at Analyzing
	the Globalist's next move.
	And now, The David Nutt Show.
	you I want to thank Michelle Obama.
	Thank you very much, Unrockfan.
	Thank you for the tip. I appreciate that.
	Well, I thought I got more to say about this.
	Again, they make it about free speech, but here's a Jewish student wearing a Star of David necklace, denied entry to his own university because he's Jewish.
	I'm a UCLA student, he says.
	I deserve to go here.
	We pay tuition.
	This is our school, and they're not letting me walk in.
	And by the way, a lot of the people who are there, the protesters, don't go to that school, but they're keeping students who do go to that school out.
	But let me ask you, why do you think this would be any different?
	All of my life, I've watched these schools like UCLA and Harvard and Columbia.
	I've watched them keep people out because they're not the right skin color or because they're not the right gender, whichever gender they want to imagine, right?
	They have the people running these institutions and And now you've got these donors like Ackman or Ackerman or whatever that don't...
	They gave money all that time.
	And they were just fine with it.
	Until the mob turned against them.
	Right? That's what always happens.
	It's just like Robosphere. You generate this Marxist mob and eventually the mob comes for you.
	And so that's what's happening with it.
	So why is that a surprise?
	Because for decades...
	They have been telling somebody, you can't come here because you're this or you're that.
	So why wouldn't they now at this point say, you can't come in because you're Jewish?
	They've been saying that to white people, to males, for a long time at these universities.
	And so you look at what is happening.
	It's not just, of course, this one.
	At Columbia...
	Here are the Palestinian protesters.
	And you can see some of these people obviously are not students there.
	They're pretty old, I think.
	Maybe they're professors teaching this stuff.
	But here's the fight that's going on here.
	Big mob coming in.
	They're busting into these buildings.
	And there's two guys there that are locking arms and saying, no, we're going to stand here protecting us.
	And so these people wearing masks are shoving them around.
	By the way, that guy wearing the glasses there...
	That's the grandson of Doug Wilson.
	He says, I'm very proud of him for standing there.
	And so here's the mob, big mob, against two people, shoving them.
	This is assault.
	I got it on.
	He says this is assault.
	This is 100% assault.
	I'm here.
	This is 100% assault.
	Is someone recording this?
	I got it, I got it. This is 100% assault.
	What is your name? What is your name?
	Alright, walk out, walk out! What is your name?
	Yeah, what's your name? They got caps on.
	They got the N95 Fauci masks on.
	They won't give their names, right?
	Free speech, right?
	Is this free speech? Well, you know, Mike Johnson looks at this and he says, you know what we need?
	We need a regulation coming out of Congress that shuts down free speech.
	That's his response to all this stuff.
	Pathetic. Pathetic.
	UCLA, the brawls and everything else that are happening there, it's pathetic that they would make this about...
	That's not about free speech at all.
	There's nothing at the universities about free speech.
	That's the thing that bothers me so much about Mike Johnson and these other people.
	Well, here's what this is about.
	We had one of them explain it to everybody.
	This is really about a Marxist revolution.
	There's only one way. Just like that chant that we enjoy so much, there is only one solution.
	It's a part of revolution.
	We must have revolution so we can have a socialist reconstruction of the United States of America.
	Yep, that's it. Let's understand what this is about.
	It's not about free speech.
	It's not about debate. This is about violence.
	It's about mob violence.
	And as he said, there's only one solution.
	Intifada revolution.
	We must have a revolution so we can have a socialist reconstruction of the USA. You see, we have these youthful idiots.
	At the bottom. Who have been radicalized by our indoctrination systems.
	And then at the top, we've got the people like Klaus Schwab saying the same thing, quite frankly.
	You know, Klaus Schwab and his ilk are Marxists.
	They've got Common Pass, and they've got, you know, the Commons Project, because they're a communist.
	They're a communist party.
	And they want universal basic income where you don't own anything because, folks, they're communists.
	How many different ways do they have to tell us?
	They're not woke.
	They're not climate, you know.
	They're communists.
	And so they want this at the top.
	They want to destroy everything.
	As he points out, we have to have a revolution so we can have a socialist reconstruction.
	Destroy everything. And then reconstruct it in their communist utopia, which is dystopian hell.
	That's what this stuff is about from all of these people.
	And absolutely no question about it.
	Let's talk a little bit about climate here.
	We have...
	I was talking about the moves yesterday by the Biden administration, and now you've got BlackRock.
	Larry Fink has made his move and is telling people at the World Economic Forum, investment tip, what we need to do is get into...
	Some other alternative form of energy because our AI centers are really hungry.
	And he doesn't say it, but so are their surveillance centers.
	And that's ultimately what AI is going to be about, is surveillance.
	So you look at these massive data centers that the NSA is running, and you look at the artificial intelligence, the amount of energy that these things are using is astronomical.
	Now... He talks about that.
	He says, you know, it's going to explode, and we're not going to be able to have the energy for artificial intelligence and for surveillance that we need if it's wind and solar.
	So we've got to go to something else.
	Well, the Biden administration, on the one hand, is starting to say, well, let's go to nuclear because we're still going to shut down all the coal plants.
	They're just too cheap and plentiful.
	So we can't have anything that's cheap and plentiful.
	Everything must be expensive because this is about a transfer of wealth to the few.
	So they've got to give us the most expensive ones, and we've got to make sure that these people at the top, when they burn everything down, that when America is reconstructed, they're going to be on the ground floor and everybody's going to be paying them.
	And so they've been shutting down coal plants.
	And now the other hand of the Biden administration is saying, well, we're going to put restrictions on Russian uranium, which is only 25%.
	But it is also 25%.
	And we take away 25% of your supply.
	If you're a retailer trying to operate on a small margin, if they take away 25% of your business, you're out of business.
	And so, there's a lot of coal and natural gas plants that they're taking down.
	Will they start up nuclear power plants that they took down before?
	We'll have to wait and see.
	But the bottom line is, it's going to be them who is going to make the money.
	Now, the Daily Skeptic asks, why is the WHO asking doctors to lie in order to promote climate alarmism?
	Well, because they're both MacGuffins.
	And because the goals are the same.
	And because they lie about everything.
	The WHO has published a new toolkit empowering health professionals to tackle climate change.
	There's absolutely no reason why you shouldn't converge these MacGuffins.
	Because again, they want, in the end, they want the same thing.
	They want depopulation, and then they want control of the people who are left.
	In fact, it requires healthcare professionals to use their authority to eschew science and to lie to their patients and politicians.
	The climate war is, after all, political.
	That's what the Daily Skeptic said.
	Yeah, that's right. And, by the way, so is medicine now.
	Medicine is also political.
	So why shouldn't they, if they're both political and they've got the same goal, why shouldn't they merge?
	Since the climate scare story emerged in the 1980s, well, that's when they made it about global warming, but before that, through the 70s, it was all about the Ice Age.
	But they still wanted the same thing.
	They just change with the fashions.
	The era of global boiling, as UN Secretary Gutierrez put this, this also happens to be the era in which unprecedented social development has occurred.
	So, surprisingly, for a toolkit that is aimed at people such as doctors who have proven capacity to understand scientific literature, if they care, which they don't typically, they read the marketing press releases from big pharmaceutical and they...
	They pass that on to you.
	The toolkit offers little evidence in support of these claims.
	Well, the doctors have been prepared for this because they were willing to accept little or no evidence about a pandemic.
	They're willing to accept little or no evidence about the safety and efficacy of the vaccine.
	They didn't even care to vet the lies that were there, that lies that would not pass just critical thought.
	Let alone show me your data in a scientific investigation.
	So this toolkit says that changing weather patterns, quote-unquote, and extreme weather events can reduce crop yields, potentially leading to food insecurity and malnutrition.
	That's the plan, isn't it?
	Food insecurity and malnutrition, poverty, slavery to these people.
	As data clearly shows, though, since 1990, there have been radical reductions in mortality caused by malaria, malnutrition, diarrheal disease, natural disasters, exposure to temperature extremes.
	You see, one of the best things that you can do for people, not just the quality of their life, but life expectancy, is to make sure they've got cheap, abundant energy.
	You know, things like hygiene follow from that.
	We don't improve our health with vaccines.
	We improve our health, interestingly enough, with cheap, abundant energy, which is why they're trying to take it away from us.
	How does the data compare with the WHO's claim Well, they show the charts in this Daily Skeptic article here.
	They say, malaria deaths.
	Have been cut in half. Yeah, you know, you got air conditioning.
	You can avoid, as everybody does now, they avoid the outdoors.
	They stay indoors with the air conditioning.
	You don't get bit by the mosquitoes or whatever.
	But anyway, a similar paradox can be shown by comparing the WHO's statements on food security with other UN agencies' data.
	There is no evidence of climate change adversely affecting agricultural production in vulnerable economies.
	But they want to do that anyway.
	They want to shut down farms.
	And now they're trying to use bird flu to shut down our food supply as well.
	Bill Gates wants to use AI to genetically modify beef cows so he can save the planet.
	He wants to make it, I guess, so that they can't fart.
	They'll just blow up, I guess.
	Float away. Turn into big balloons, and there you go.
	We got Cal flew.
	Cal flew away. He couldn't fart, so he just blew up like a big balloon and flew away like the Wizard of Oz.
	Microsoft founder Bill Gates recently discussed how AI could fight climate change on his podcast.
	His podcast is called Unconfuse Me with Bill Gates.
	Well, I wouldn't want to be confused with Bill Gates either if I were Bill Gates.
	It was just the type of unhinged conversation you would expect from the same man who touts synthetic beef depopulation and preventing cows from burping and farting, says Technocracy News.
	So when he was discussing in this interview with a data scientist, Hannah Ritchie, he says, I was very stunned how the AIs went from basically not being able to read or write at all to doing that in a very facile way, he said. When asked if he thought AI could play a role in taking action on the climate, he said, oh, absolutely.
	Yeah, because it'll be there to measure and to watch and to record and to re-snitch on everything that we do.
	It's going to have a big role in that because that's what this is all about.
	Absolutely. He said he cited the examples of genetically modifying beef cattle with AI so they can produce less methane.
	You know, this is, I'm seeing multiple articles every day about using artificial intelligence with genetic modification.
	You know, we talk about genetics, robotics, artificial intelligence, nanotechnology.
	The acronym is GRAIN. And they're starting to converge, aren't they?
	In a lot of different ways. I mean, we see robotics and artificial intelligence.
	That's how you get these robots that are able to look at the table, and you give them instructions, and it pulls the stuff out.
	So, robotics and artificial intelligence, we've seen that being merged.
	Now there's all this stuff about artificial intelligence and genetics, and that really concerns me.
	Because I've used chat GPT. It really concerns me.
	So, anyway, he says, so we can genetically modify the beef cattle so they produce less methane.
	Or by using AI to somehow produce meat without the cow.
	Well, here's an idea, Bill.
	Why don't you let us eat without the gates?
	Why don't you let us eat without constantly hectoring us about what we are eating?
	You know, really tired of his advice.
	As a matter of fact, a lot of people are tired of his foods.
	Remember, he invested in impossible foods.
	He invested in upside foods, which really ought to be called upside down foods.
	He invested in beyond meat, which I think ought to be called beyond food.
	Anyway, he and his ilk are nothing more than ring race of greed.
	You know, they're not looking at some ring of power, although that's essentially what it is.
	But they're just, they are so in love with money.
	That it's kind of turned them into these horrific ringwraiths.
	And he's not even aware of it, I think.
	He doesn't even realize just how despicable his actions are, perhaps.
	He has said in the past, all rich countries should move to 100% synthetic beef.
	Why? So he can get richer? Yeah, that's why.
	And that he is optimistic that fake meat products will be a very good alternative for consumers.
	Last November, Beyond Meat cut nearly 20% of its non-production workforce following plummeting sales as customers eschewed the...
	Isn't that interesting? Looks like chew, doesn't it?
	But it sounds kind of like a sneeze.
	Eschew his food.
	It's very appropriate to use that word.
	His highly processed and unhealthy concoction.
	Once heavily hyped, its stock, that is, Beyond Meat, has fallen more than 60%.
	And an opinion piece in the New York Times recently referred to lab-grown meat as, quote, the revolution that died on its way to dinner.
	Well, better that than the people die after they eat his dinner.
	Because that's what's typically going to happen.
	Such products don't offer much in the way of environmental benefits and may even be causing more harm than good.
	So Gates is going after a cow burps.
	He is investing in an Australian startup that's focused on preventing cows from burping methane emission.
	They're being polite about it.
	I don't know if the cows burp that much.
	Basically, they're farting here.
	By feeding them a dietary supplement with a synthetic version of an ingredient in red seaweed that prohibits methane formation.
	So it's not even giving them red seaweed.
	But it's a synthetic version of red seaweed.
	Isn't that great? Yeah, really nutritious stuff.
	Gates Investment Fund said, although cows are a significant greenhouse gas source, and it, no, it doesn't matter.
	It really doesn't. The methane, the CO2 doesn't matter.
	We shouldn't be concerned about that at all.
	We can talk about it to point out how hypocritical these people are.
	They wring their hands in despair about greenhouse gas and CO2, and then you got people like Taylor Swift that goes around the world equivalent to seven times in one year with her private jet even.
	They're absolute hypocrites.
	So we can talk about the only reason to talk about CO2 and methane is to, number one, debunk the lie, and number two, to point out their hypocrisy.
	But we shouldn't say, well, this is a better solution over here.
	We should never get into that.
	We should never assume, go with their assumptions that CO2 and methane need to be taken down.
	They don't need to be taken down.
	That's why God gave us plants.
	It's a closed-loop system.
	It adjusts.
	Anyway, livestock agriculture remains one of the cheapest protein sources globally, says Bill Gates.
	That's why he wants to get rid of it.
	Because if you've got cheap protein sources, you don't need his expensive sources that are going to make him rich.
	If carbon really is as bad as he claims, shouldn't he be concerned about the large carbon footprint involved in developing and maintaining and disposing of AI technology?
	Yeah. Yeah, they never...
	And that's the biggest hypocrisy.
	It's not even the private jets and all the global meetings that these people go to.
	It's artificial intelligence data centers.
	It's NSA data centers.
	It's constant biometric surveillance of everything that we do.
	Facial recognition everywhere.
	That uses a lot of energy.
	And they don't care about that.
	And we also know, because, you know, when Larry Fink talks about money, he tells you the truth.
	Or at least he tells his friends at the World Economic Forum the truth.
	And so, you know, we know that they don't have, they're not going to be able to get enough power out of solar and wind, and it's not going to be steady state power, and so it's going to have to be something else.
	And it's going to require tons of it, a lot more than they've got right now.
	It's going to explode, as you point out.
	The emissions from the IT technology industry as a whole are expected to account for 14% of global emissions by 2040.
	I think that's very low.
	As he was talking about, you know, the explosion many, many times more than it is right now.
	So, placing all the blame on the planet's woes on cows and glossing over the negative impact of AI on the environment, the planet doesn't have any woes.
	The woes are being imposed by the globalists.
	We don't have a problem with global warming.
	We don't have a problem with CO2. We don't have a problem with methane.
	And anyway, the artificial intelligence does show their hypocrisy.
	So he says, but it all makes sense when you look at their big investments in meat alternatives and into open AI. But I don't really care about the AI's effect on the environment except for its hypocrisy.
	But not a day goes by now that you don't see something about genetically modifying food and that you don't see all of these scare tactics about bird flu and what it's going to do to cows and all the rest of this stuff.
	And it is now at the point where the media is taken to...
	This is the new thing today.
	The media has taken to scolding The U.S. Department of Agriculture, which has been over the top stupid about this stuff and aggressive and trying to expand its empire.
	It wasn't enough that the FDA went out and tested milk.
	Oh, we found some viral particles.
	But don't worry, nobody got sick.
	The cows weren't sick. People that consumed it weren't sick.
	And, you know, we boil it and it breaks it up or kills it or whatever, you know, whether these things are alive or dead or if they even exist, as we talked about yesterday.
	So the FDA said, nah, we tested it, but it's not a problem.
	So then after that, the USDA goes out and starts looking at ground beef.
	And, you know, I kind of think it's interesting that they would look at ground beef instead of at steaks, right?
	Why do I say that? Well, because when you grind up the beef and everything, what you're doing, you're shredding it and all this kind of stuff and processing it, and it's getting exposed a lot more to the atmosphere.
	And you can find anything and anything if you ramp the PCR test up enough.
	So it makes it even better if you test ground beef, which has been aerated, right?
	All the different parts, internal and everything.
	It's been exposed to the air.
	And you can find anything in ground beef, especially ramping it up with a PCR test like that, rather than looking at a steak.
	But even that, and all the talk about how they're going to Start following cattle and tagging them and banning them from going across state lines if they haven't been vaccinated and haven't been tested and all the rest of the stuff.
	We understand that game because we've been the cattle.
	We've been there. We've had, as Eric Peters, we've had the ear tag that they tried to put on us and we know exactly what that game is.
	And so we know what the agenda of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is.
	And yet, here's the new thing. We've got reporters now, various outlets are starting to criticize the U.S. Department of Agriculture for not doing enough.
	Where have we seen this before? Well, we saw that as well during 2020.
	You had all of these organizations scolding Trump and scolding Fauci for not doing enough, giving them cover to be more aggressive.
	Because we all know, don't we by now, don't we understand that it's a partnership between the media and government?
	And so it's like, go ahead, criticize me.
	Go ahead, go ahead, do it. And then I'll respond to that criticism by doing more.
	If I just do it on my own, it looks a little bit suspicious, right?
	But you criticize me, and that's what's going on right now.
	They're not letting up on this bird flu thing.
	To come after our food.
	And everybody understands it, like I showed at the beginning of the week.
	That one article that was put up on Zero Hedge, people just ranked on Zero Hedge and on Epoch Times for putting that piece of propaganda and clickbait up.
	And it was just 500 comments, not a single one in agreement with any of that stuff.
	Every single one of them.
	Mocking, satirizing them, condemning them for this foolishness and seeing through it.
	But again, we'll see what happens.
	Published on April 29th, a study on the CDC's website.
	They are so concerned about safety and purity of food, aren't they?
	As a matter of fact, this is a good place for me to play.
	Several people have talked about what Walmart is doing now.
	They've gone from corn processed and canned in Arkansas to corn coming out of Thailand.
	That has a lot of really bad stuff in it.
	And double the calories. Here's a breakdown from one lady.
	So here's an older can of corn from my pantry.
	And we're going to compare the two with this newer can of corn.
	Okay? Number one, it says that it is picked and grown on the same day.
	It has this green little great for you label here.
	Over here it says that it's from Arkansas.
	Has 45 calories.
	What else is it? Oh, and it's gluten free.
	Okay, let's compare that to the second can.
	By the way, the biggest difference, the second can is a product of Thailand.
	Looking at the nutritional information, we went from 45 calories to 90 calories.
	There's more sodium, there's more carbs.
	Apparently it's no longer picked and packaged on the same day like this one, and it's no longer gluten-free.
	It also lost that great for you tag.
	Let me tell you why.
	On this new can of corn from Walmart, there's a health warning.
	Let's read it. Health warning on your corn.
	I can't expose you to chemicals, including lead, which are known in the state of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm.
	I guess that's reason enough to lose the great for you symbol that was on this can.
	So go into your pantry.
	Check out your canned corn.
	Yeah. She's at the very beginning of that, by the way, and she just misspoke because she corrected it later, I think.
	Besides, it's got the sticker that says, picked and grown on the same day.
	It's like, what? No, picked and canned on the same day.
	But not in Thailand.
	I guess maybe they lay it out on some lead for a couple of days before they put it in the can.
	Who knows? Yeah, they're so concerned about our food safety and food purity, aren't they?
	Where's the FDA in all this, right?
	Do they care that Walmart is now selling corn with lead in it?
	No, they don't care.
	That's Walmart. You know, they were the kind of people that were essential during the lockdown.
	The mom-and-pop businesses on Main Street were non-essential, but Walmart was essential.
	And I said, one of the reasons that really grated with me was because we had been through that about 30 years earlier, 25, 30 years earlier.
	We had our stores and power was knocked out with a hurricane for several days, the only time that we shut the chain down.
	If we had a snowstorm or anything else like that, I would go around and pick people up and take them to work.
	But nobody had power.
	When power came back in one area, we opened up.
	Wall Street. It was Wall Street.
	Walmart. Big Wall Street store.
	Right across the street. The cops came around to shut us down.
	And so Walmart's open.
	Oh yeah, Walmart can stay open.
	You guys are going to shut down. Yeah?
	So, yeah, I've seen that whole thing before as well.
	April 29th, a study on the CDC's website.
	The abstract says infected cattle experienced non-specific illness.
	Well, maybe since this is supposed to be scientific, maybe you could be specific about it if you're going to try to take stuff from us.
	But, of course, you know, whether they're taking away your speech or they're taking away your food, They're not going to be specific about it.
	They also had reduced feed intake and rumination and an abrupt drop in milk production.
	We got any numbers with that?
	An abrupt drop?
	Was it 1%? 5%?
	100%? Tell us about that.
	Although the U.S. FDA has indicated the commercial milk supply remains safe, the detection of influenza virus and unpasteurized bovine milk is a concern.
	Continued surveillance of bird flu is needed to prevent cross-species and mammal-to-mammal transmission.
	No, it's not. Where we are right now, folks, is we're in another one of these bat-soup-pangolin moments here.
	Oh, we have zoonotic species transmission and evolution and all the rest of this stuff.
	It's absolute total nonsense.
	And again, you know, Reuters is telling us, and this is by the gold standard.
	The PCR test.
	We've seen all of this before.
	And yet, they are shamelessly lying to us, aren't they?
	They think we don't know.
	But we know.
	And we know that they know we know.
	And they're still going to lie to us.
	I'm a bit disappointed in the lack of transparency and urgency, said an epidemiologist who was interviewed by Salon.
	This is why I said this is the new thing, where they come out...
	And they criticize these agencies for not being authoritarian enough.
	The bureaucracy needs to do more.
	It needs to ban more. It needs to do this faster.
	I'm a bit disappointed in the lack of transparency and urgency, particularly with the USDA. So particularly with the ones who are the most aggressive.
	See, that's what they were saying with Fauci.
	I'm particularly concerned Fauci hasn't done more.
	They go to the person who is going to be the lead in all of this, or the agency that's going to be the lead in all of this.
	And they criticize them for moving too slow because they're itching to go faster.
	And it just doesn't seem that there's an appetite to get ahead in this.
	Salon then went on to report the notion that is now perhaps calling this bird flu.
	And they said, well, is this really kind of, should we start calling it cow flu now?
	And the expert that they got said, well, we have to make it very clear that this is not a new virus.
	Yes, it's been around since 2002.
	It's been around since SARS was.
	It's not new. It's not like COVID-19 in the October of 2019.
	It has existed for over 20 years.
	Well, again, at least they haven't recycled that part of it yet.
	The New York Institute of Technology told Salon, calling this the cow flu is misleading.
	If it is only circulating around with cows, then it can be called the cow flu, he said.
	Well, then I guess that means that bird flu is really only for birds, right?
	Oh, no, it could jump.
	It could jump. It could jump to pangolins, even though we don't have them here.
	Why not? So they said it's also important to emphasize that it's not a definitive conclusion that the cats from the CDC report, yeah, they said two cats that they fed raw milk to died.
	Be very afraid of raw milk, they said.
	No. They said he even, this is the epidemiologist, he said, well, the cats could have died from something else, you know, than raw milk.
	They could have even died from eating infected birds.
	We don't know. This is not a virus, however, that we want to play around with.
	It really confirmed that raw milk is something we don't want people to consume.
	See, this one is rolling out for the benefit of Big Agro, like the other one rolled out for the benefit of Big Pharma.
	Yes, they really don't want people to consume raw milk.
	So I can imagine another one of these conferences, like they had the Milken Institute in October 2019, where they asked Fauci, how do we get everybody to take an untested vaccine worldwide?
	We do it from the inside with disruption, and we do it iteratively.
	Here's the iterative process.
	We see this every day. They iterate it, reiterate it every day.
	Every day they take it a little bit further.
	And so Big Agro wants to shut down raw milk once and for all.
	And then Big Pharma will have its turn to feed at the trough of bureaucratic bans and all the rest of the stuff because they are angling to try to vaccinate all animals.
	You see, since they played this herd immunity game on us, And since they injected us with poison, people are a little bit shy about this at this point in time.
	So now it's time to go for the actual herd, to go for the actual cattle.
	And why not?
	Because they can do them on an annual basis, just like they tell you to give your dog an annual rabies shot.
	Oh, you mean last year's didn't work?
	Yeah. And they can do that.
	They can require that. Or you're not going to be able to process it because they've got the monopolist to control the processing plants.
	You're not going to be able to transport your cattle.
	You're not going to be able to process your cattle.
	And, you know, they can get many, many times more vaccines out there into the cattle than they can into us.
	And that way they can still poison us by poisoning our food.
	Just have to put a little bit of a label on there.
	Warning! This contains deadly mRNA vaccine particles in it that are going to do all kinds of things to your body, but hey, no problem.
	We just remove the good-for-you label that's on the food.
	They said scientists don't know what happens if someone consumes infected raw milk at the moment, but it's a good sign that there haven't been any fatal cases linked to raw milk.
	Never. Not with this.
	Not with anything else.
	And they said, even though there has been one human case of bird flu caught from cows.
	Now, here's where these people are lying a lot.
	By the way, 5% of Americans drink raw milk.
	So, if this was an issue, you'd be seeing a lot of people sick and dying, wouldn't you?
	but no and this like I mentioned before this one person that they claim got sick Had redness in their eye one report said it was pink eye.
	That was it. That was it Do you think we could live with this? Do you think we should destroy the food supply?
	over somebody who got red eye or conjunctivitis as a matter of fact That's exactly what dairy farmers are worried about and they said it out loud loud Barron's publication interviewed Dr.
	Joe Armstrong. He is a cattle production expert at the University of Minnesota Extension.
	And the article that was on Barron's headline was, Dairy Farmers Are Still Reluctant to Report Suspected Avian Flu.
	One expert insinuated that the regulation could soon be changed to force farmers to slaughter their entire cattle herds if just one cow tests positive.
	We knew this was the goal. If they want to have zero bird flu, well, they may say you got to have zero cattle.
	It's always this zero stuff.
	We're going to have zero traffic deaths.
	Well, that means we're going to have zero cars, and we're going to have zero cases of PCR, or we're going to lock down all of Shanghai and keep it locked down.
	We've seen this, how it destroyed the Chinese economy and everything else.
	But they don't care. These people, like Chinese communists, like Mao, They like to starve people, to show them how powerful they are.
	And we're run by the same people.
	This is Mao's America now that we're talking about here, as Sheevan Fleet pointed out.
	So Dr. Joe Armstrong, cattle expert, was asked by Barron's.
	Barron said, what would keep farmers from wanting to tell the authorities that they think their cows are sick?
	Cows aren't sick, folks.
	They're not sick. Nobody is sick.
	None of the stuff that was tested, the cows are not sick.
	It's just like the other quote-unquote pandemic in 2020.
	Nobody was sick.
	It was a PCR test.
	Armstrong says, the major reluctance when you talk to farmers is there's still too much connection to highly pathogenic avian influenza.
	So farmers are looking at what the USDA requires of poultry flocks.
	When they test positive.
	And Barron's knows.
	They said, you mean that the USDA requires farmers to kill their entire poultry flock if they get a positive test?
	The bird doesn't have to be sick.
	It can be only one bird.
	Who knows what the magnification is on their PCR test, but you got one bird that gets a positive?
	Kill the entire flock.
	Millions of birds killed it.
	He said, Barron says, you think the farmers worry they'll be ordered to kill their cows?
	And Armstrong says, yeah, correct.
	Because we refuse to name it something else, even though it is something else.
	There's still too much connection.
	He says, after that, it's just the economics of having the USDA on your farm and trying to manage that.
	Imagine for these farmers, having the USDA come on their farm is like having the IRS auditor come into your house.
	Oh, nice house you got here.
	That type of thing, you know?
	Where'd you get that thing?
	Did you report that or whatever?
	Barron's, in addition to mandating that positive test be reported to the USDA, the new federal order also requires testing any lactating cattle before their move.
	I talked about that before. He says, does that go too far?
	He asked this guy. Listen to what the guy says.
	Because they're afraid of the government.
	He says, that's a step in the right direction.
	What? That's a step in the direction of tyranny.
	These people are afraid of our tyrannical government.
	We've already gone too far, haven't we?
	A step in the right direction.
	He says, I kind of think it's a wake-up call to industry to say that unless you want the USDA dictating what happens, you need to come up with your own plan to control this.
	This is like saying, censor yourself.
	So that Google doesn't do it.
	Or Facebook. Or Twitter.
	Censor yourself. Or we'll do it for you.
	How far away is that from just telling people, kill yourself or I'm going to do it, right?
	You know, I could make it very painful for you.
	I could just commit suicide.
	How about that? So, with all this happening...
	Biden has locked in regulations targeting every appliance owned by almost every household.
	Quote, for too long, outdated energy efficiency standards have led to higher utility bills.
	Oh, well, he's making higher utility bills by...
	Banning our fuel, by shutting down our power plants, by giving us the most expensive kinds of energy that we can find, wind and solar.
	Why do you think the Chinese and the Indians are using coal?
	Because it is far and away the cheapest and most reliable form of energy.
	So that will be banned by the Department of Energy.
	They finalize their regulations on Tuesday for a popular appliance that will push the market toward adopting heat pump technology.
	This is the same time that the Department of Energy is banning everything that's not electric.
	At the same time, the EPA is shutting down power generation into the grid.
	The DOE's final energy efficiency regulations for water heaters will apply to common electrical water heaters and significantly increase the share of those models that use heat pumps, according to the agency.
	It'll significantly increase the price.
	The Biden administration's efforts to push rules and regulations targeting appliances ranging from pool pump motors and light bulbs to furnaces and portable generators.
	Yeah, folks, if you want any of this kind of stuff, you better stock up now because it's going to be unbelievably expensive and inefficient if they can even build it.
	Because, you know, I guess we can import it from China when they build it for us.
	By the way, Jennifer Granholm, who's the Secretary of Energy, what does she know about any of this stuff?
	What does she know even about efficiency or designing any of this stuff?
	She's a lawyer. She's not an engineer.
	She's a lawyer. She's a Harvard lawyer.
	She wasn't an American citizen until she was 21 years old, and then she got naturalized, so I guess she could get into government, you know, being there at Harvard.
	You know, you really should get naturalized so that you can, you know, be the energy secretary.
	But she said, almost every household has a water heater, and for too long, outdated energy efficiency standards have led to higher utility bills for families, she said.
	So, you know, you need to buy these new expensive water heaters to save money.
	It's just like the cost-benefit analysis of the warp speed vaccines or anything else.
	But since she's not an engineer, she doesn't do cost-benefit analysis.
	But you don't have to be an engineer.
	You just have to be an ordinary citizen to look at this and say, I can't plop down all this money to save a couple of bucks.
	It doesn't make any sense to do that.
	So they order people to do that.
	And some people are calling pure Bolshevik on this.
	So from this administration, we've seen them go after gas stoves, air conditioning units with regulation, refrigerators, washing machines, dishwashers, now water heaters.
	How many more home appliances will Americans eventually have to replace then because of regulation?
	So just to be clear, when it comes to water heaters, and it is a...
	It is proposed, what has been put forward.
	And if it is enacted, it would not take into effect until 2029.
	So let's not forget that.
	Oh, yeah. We've got another four or five years.
	So don't worry about it.
	Just kick the can down the road.
	We'll take everything away from you.
	Power, you know, force you into electric appliances.
	You'll pay through the nose for these things and replace stuff that is working just fine, you know.
	You got a water heater?
	Oh, well, you need to throw that in the trash and buy a new expensive one that runs off the electric grid because we're getting ready to shut down the electric grid in five years.
	This is crazy. These people do not, they want to save you money.
	That's the argument now.
	That's exactly the reason why you don't want to do this.
	Look, whether you're talking about canned corn or whether you're talking about appliances, these people don't care about our health.
	They don't care about our wealth.
	This is about them and their unending greed for money and for power.
	And that's all any of this stuff is about.
	We need to push back on this.
	I've had enough. I hope you've had enough.
	Let's move on to some other things.
	We're going to have a little bit of fun when we come back talking about some of the things that are happening just in news in general, some crazy stuff as well.
	But we're going to take a break here, and I'd like to get some comments from people.
	Travis, you can feed those back to me.
	I want to play a new piece that I did here.
	I didn't do any video cover for it, but I'm curious to see if anybody recognizes this, where it came from.
	So we're going to play this for you.
	We'll be right back.
	Game of Thrones
	The Last Jedi
	Hear news now at APSradionews.com Or get the APS Radio app and never miss a show.
	miss another story.
	All right. Anybody name that tune?
	If so, let us know and we'll see if anybody knows that.
	Let's talk about some news here.
	I thought this was an amazing story.
	Can't make this up.
	An emergency slide falls off the Boeing plane.
	We talked about that. But it was discovered and outside the home...
	Of a lawyer whose firm is suing Boeing.
	By the way, we just had a second whistleblower die.
	This one not under as suspicious of circumstances.
	I'd been sick with an infection type of thing, but still, you know, the whistleblowers are dying left and right.
	Parts of the plane are falling off so much so that the lawyer who is suing them had this emergency ramp falls down in the water outside his lakefront property, I guess.
	Attorney Jake Bissell Linsk.
	His firm is currently suing Boeing due to one of its planes losing a door plug during a flight in January, discovered the emergency slide from Delta Airlines Flight 520 washed ashore on some rocks outside his oceanfront home in New York City.
	So there you go, like I said before.
	That's why they call it Boeing, because that's the noise the parts make when they fall off the ground.
	Jeffrey Tucker talked about the ruination of plane travel.
	He's somebody, I guess, who still flies frequently, and he has a lot of issues.
	And, of course, my wife and my daughter, separate trips that they took on both of them.
	Had issues with plane flights being delayed, canceled, things like that.
	And they just did, you know, one trip.
	And so, okay, Mark Dora, thank you for the tip.
	Thank you, David, for continuing to be the voice of reason.
	Thank you very much. I appreciate that.
	So, Jeffrey Tucker says, you know, the best time to write about how horrible plane travel is is when you had one of your planes scheduling disasters that happens with this.
	He says, when it doesn't happen and your flight goes well, you just don't care about it.
	But he says, when you're in the thick of it, as I am right now, as I'm writing this, in a 36-hour international travel time on a 19-hour delayed domestic flight.
	It just took off. He says, yeah, when that happens, it feels like the apocalypse.
	It's more common now than I can ever remember.
	I'm at the point of trying not to travel unless I have to.
	Because three of the five of my last trips these days seem to end up this way.
	So he's had five recent trips in three of them.
	In our family, two trips in both of them, right?
	Yeah, I reached my tipping point on flying a long time ago, even to the extent that when we went to Washington to cover a thing, I said, I'll go, but only if I can take an extra couple of days and drive it myself.
	And that's what we did. We drove it.
	I said, I don't want to fly.
	And that was in 2016.
	I hate flying.
	I hate flying because of...
	But it used to just be the interference of the TSA and things like that.
	Now, it's a real safety hazard.
	It really is.
	It's a good thing it's not Kristi Namjie just shoot the dog.
	Isn't it interesting the name of her book was No Going Back or something like that?
	It was a one-way ticket out of politics for her, wasn't it?
	Then you have older people and their medicines and other special needs.
	They could be shots or otherwise require special conditions, and they might not have enough medication with them, and so then everything gets shut down for a day or whatever.
	He said, but the most bizarre circumstance affected my flight.
	He said, on landing, previously, the oxygen masks suddenly fell from the ceiling.
	So maintenance had to come and check that out.
	But of course, there is a shortage of those people.
	And they spend all day running from plane to plane to try to get the little lights to change from red to green.
	No one really understands how anything works.
	So you just fiddle with things until the machine tells you it works.
	Well, welcome to the new normal that Trump ushered in on us.
	Killing people and, you know, the normal of deliberately dumbed down people with these schools and all the rest of this stuff.
	To show you just how stupid it all is.
	This is coming out of the U.K., And it's a luxury fashion brand in the UK called Jordan Luca.
	Let's hope that it doesn't come here.
	Because what they're selling people are pre-stained jeans that look like you just peed your pants.
	And of course, that's what we all want, isn't it?
	You look at yourself in the mirror and it's like...
	Something's just not right. It doesn't look like I've peed in my pants.
	And it reminds me of that joke they told about Lord Nelson.
	Not true, I'm sure. But they said, yeah, there's a picture of the pants that you have peed in.
	I don't know. Maybe this is a fashion trend coming from Biden or something.
	I guess it depends.
	But the joke was, they say, well, why are the British wearing red coats?
	And he says, well, it's because that way if we get shot, we don't see the blood.
	It's good for morale, that type of thing.
	And then the guy comes in and says, Lord Nelson, the French Navy, the bulk of it has just come around this island.
	And he says, fetch me my brown pants.
	Maybe they're prepping us for such a moment, you know?
	Everybody's got to have those pants when they break the news to us about what they're doing with the war or with the dollar or with the next lockdown or whatever.
	Jordan Luca is a luxury fashion brand in the UK. Just introduced their new pre-stained jeans that look like somebody peed in them.
	And of course, they sold out in minutes and they were selling them For $800 Canadian.
	We will never understand the world of fashion and clothing like this.
	It makes us really not want to understand it.
	Well, you know, for the longest time, people have been spending a lot of money to dress like they're poor, right?
	What was his name? Billy Joel.
	He hasn't written a song for three decades or something.
	You've got to spend a lot of money to dress.
	I can't remember the lyric now.
	Anyway, he was talking about how you had to spend a lot of money to look like you didn't have money.
	And so people have been, you know, buying more and more jeans with holes in them to look like they're rags and everything.
	So now I guess we can get soiled pants to look like we are poor and homeless at the same time.
	So I guess it fits.
	This is the new normal. And as I was saying before about the Biden administration making everything more expensive, all of our appliances and everything, a new Biden energy rule will raise the cost of a new home by $31,000.
	No problem. You know, you don't like that old, inefficient home, do you?
	Let's just raise the price of housing by $31,000.
	It isn't like people are having any trouble buying homes now, right?
	I mean, you've got to...
	I saw the debate on reason about whether or not there ought to be limits or whatever on...
	The amount of houses that the big Wall Street companies can buy, because they're the only ones who can afford to buy these houses now as interest rates stay high and the price of housing continues to go up and up and up.
	What's driving the cost of houses up?
	A lot of it is regulations like this, just like they drive the price of cars up with regulations, or the price of water heaters, or your HVAC. All this stuff is being constantly driven up.
	It isn't bad enough that they print money, you know, quote-unquote.
	They print regulations to do that.
	So you know, they tax us with their inflation, but they also tax us with these rules, and the rules are there without representation.
	$31,000 added to the cost of housing to make it even more unaffordable than it is with his already bad economy.
	And it's kind of interesting as people are, you know, oh, we're going to be a friend to the average American because we're going to stop these big Wall Street companies from buying up all the houses and turning everybody into renters.
	It's like, well, your ban isn't really going to stop that.
	You are interfering with the marketplace by artificially inflating the price of everything.
	So get your rules off of us.
	So you can buy cheaper cars and cheaper homes.
	If it weren't for these rules, you would have many suppliers who would go in and say, well, okay, people can't afford to buy this house.
	I'll make a cheaper house. No, you can't make a cheaper house because I've got these rules in here, and that's a floor.
	You can't go below that.
	Meanwhile, on the highways, we're going to have tens of thousands of driverless trucks.
	Now, we're not talking about the battery trucks.
	They're working on that as well, and that's also a big issue.
	And that's an issue of practicality as well as something of a hazard.
	But that's a separate issue, the EV stuff.
	They're pushing out these self-driving cars, quote-unquote self-driving.
	They're pushing these things out even with the diesel engines there.
	The key is they want to get rid of the humans who are driving the cars.
	And they want to put ChatGPT in charge of driving these massive semis here.
	So, again, this is tens of thousands of fully autonomous tractor trailers expected to haul freight on public roads in upcoming years.
	The plans are in place to begin with 20 driverless trucks in Texas in 2024.
	So, nobody behind the wheel of these 18 wheelers.
	That's a great idea, isn't it?
	With 25 lasers, radar, and camera sensors, the truck can see.
	Are you impressed with that?
	I'm not impressed with it.
	It can see obstacles on the road from a quarter mile out and then switch to an unobstructed lane without any instruction or manipulation from a human.
	Can it look to see if there's somebody in that lane, accurately?
	Within three or four years, Aurora and its competitors expect to put thousands of self-driving trucks on America's public freeways and put thousands of drivers out of work.
	That's their goal.
	Everywhere you look, this is what the goal is.
	The goal is to make everything unaffordable, The goal is to put us out of work.
	They're going to gradually, iteratively make our food unaffordable, our homes, our appliances, gradually replace our jobs.
	And they've been talking about this for a long time.
	For 15 years, I've been talking about, hey, their schemes are to put us out of work, and they want to condition us with universal basic income.
	That was another thing that made me so angry about Donald Trump.
	I knew that. Oh, you're not essential.
	We've got to keep the Wall Street companies here, however.
	And that's always been the plan.
	Always been the plan to replace workers.
	While the technology makes advances, the average American's mindset toward an 80,000-pound truck driving 65 miles per hour down superhighways may not be one of acceptance just yet.
	According to AAA's latest survey on the subject, most U.S. drivers express fear.
	Yeah. Or uncertainty about fully driverless vehicles.
	Two-thirds of them are afraid of them, and rightfully so.
	It isn't as if we've seen a perfect record from these other cars, is it?
	I mean, now we've got Ford being called in for an investigation for their driverless cars.
	We've seen it with Ford, Cruz, Waymo, Tesla, all of them.
	And so we're going to fail up.
	We're going to continue to, you know, if we've got problems with battery fires, well, then we go from the phones that we're catching fire to the laptops.
	We go from laptops to the electric bikes.
	We go from that to the cars.
	And then we go to the buses and now the tractor trailers.
	And then we have the battery energy storage sites where we have massive collections of batteries to do backup for solar and wind.
	That are already expensive.
	And each one of these things is a ticking time bomb to start a fire.
	And it's the same thing with the driverless side of this.
	Safety advocates have also been pointing out that almost no federal regulation is currently on the books for autonomous cars and trucks.
	Isn't that interesting? You know, the feds love to regulate everything.
	They love to regulate our dishwashers.
	They love to regulate our hot water heaters.
	But they don't want to regulate the autonomous cars and trucks.
	Why is that? Seems to me like it'd be, you know, exactly the type of thing that your bureaucracy would want to expand into.
	I mean, look at all the new people you could hire.
	You could build your little empire there regulating these autonomous cars and trucks.
	Why is it that they have absolutely no interest in regulating them?
	Well, for the same reason, they have absolutely no interest in regulating vaccines.
	Or other pharmaceutical products, for that matter, of course, because they're captured, because they're partners, because they're just looking at how they can make money.
	And hey, if it kills a bunch of us, that's all the better.
	So as of now, it's to the developers to determine if the vehicles are safe.
	Just like when Children's Health Defense called up the CDC and said, you know, they're pegylating these particles and the mRNA.
	Do you realize that a lot of people are going to go into shock with this?
	Anaphylactic shock? Oh, well, you know, says the CDC and the FDA, call Pfizer and tell them that.
	We don't care. And Pfizer didn't care either when they called them.
	If we put a vehicle on the road that isn't sufficiently safe, that we aren't confident in the safety of, then it kills everything else, says the CEO of Aurora.
	Well, let's hope that it does.
	But so far, it hasn't. Like I said before, we've had Waymo, we've had Cruz, both of them in San Francisco.
	We've had a lot of these things, but it hasn't slowed this down at all.
	They just keep making bigger and bigger things that are self-driving and bigger and bigger things that have more and more batteries that can catch fire.
	Just one of those batteries catch fire, and it's a chain reaction.
	And so we had four police officers killed in Charlotte.
	After they went to serve a warrant on an armed felon.
	Wait a minute. He's got multiple felony convictions and he's a fugitive and he's not allowed to have a gun.
	So I guess it'd be safe to serve a warrant on him because, you know, it's against the law for this guy to own a gun.
	So he won't have a gun, right?
	Except that he did because he didn't care about that law anymore than he cared about the other laws that they were coming after him for.
	He was banned from buying and possessing guns as a felon, but he didn't care.
	So Biden is making a big deal out of this.
	He's trying to ramp this up so he can call for gun control.
	So he's pretending to care about the murder of four police officers.
	Isn't that interesting? He doesn't care...
	When the police officers are murdered by his mob marching millions, his million-man migrants.
	That's what you should call it.
	The million-migrant march is what we've got here, except it's several million that are coming in.
	If something like that happens, or we've got somebody, you know, some young girl is raped and killed, he doesn't care about that.
	Won't even mention it. But he wants to be Johnny on the spot because he wants to come after guns.
	So Biden called on Congress to impose a national red flag law, as well as federal storage mandates for firearms.
	Do you think that would stop this?
	This is a guy who's got multiple felony convictions.
	Would that be a red flag?
	And there's already laws against him having a gun, so we need to have national red flag laws?
	Do you think maybe if we have a storage mandate for firearms?
	Oh, that would have stopped him.
	Yeah, this felon who's not allowed to have guns would have put his gun safely into a storage thing so that he would not have shot at the police, right?
	No, he's just trying to build public support for doing his gun control by executive order.
	That is really what he's up to.
	So, meet the lifelong felon who killed four cops in North Carolina.
	This is from Zero Hedge.
	They said, you know, he's got a long rap sheet.
	He was barred from owning or possessing any firearms.
	And so then he, I guess, took him out of his safe storage that he had.
	And he ambushed a U.S. Marshal's Fugitive Task Force.
	So he's also a fugitive.
	Police officers, as they were serving a warrant, three U.S. marshals, three, and an officer from the Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department were killed in a shootout.
	And four police officers and one marshal were injured.
	So he wounded five people, killed four.
	All law enforcement.
	So I guess, you know, we need to have more gun control laws.
	That'll solve it. As Zero Hedge says, has the leftist corporate media identified the felon?
	Well, no, because it doesn't fit the narrative.
	CNN hasn't talked about it.
	Fox News has not talked about it either.
	According to the police, U.S. Marshals attempted to serve him a warrant for firearm possession.
	He was also wanted for two counts of felony flight to try to get out of the Charlotte area.
	Yeah, I guess we didn't see that coming.
	I've got some comments about the music.
	Guard Goldsmith. John Williams.
	You got that right. Yeah, you got that right.
	And John Madison. The 1984 Olympics.
	You got that right. That's what it's from.
	Yeah, that's the Olympic fanfare in March.
	I guess the March part of it or something like that.
	Well, again, I was wondering if anybody would recognize that.
	I don't watch the Olympics, but I think they play it on a pretty regular basis.
	But I think it was the 1984 Olympics.
	I think you're right. I think it was the one they had in L.A., Because the people in LA knew how good John Williams was, so they get him to do their own Olympic thing, and it was so good.
	I think they've kept it every time since then.
	Regarding the pee pants, Atomic Dog says, pee-stained pants.
	Now you can cultivate the homeless look.
	Before the government actually makes you homeless.
	There we go. See, that's it. It's cool to be poor and homeless, and so we take the shame away from it.
	That's what I guess they're trying to do.
	And Travis tells me, page 6 on the news is reporting that the son of Fox News, Brett Baer, had to have emergency open-heart surgery for a golf ball-sized aneurysm.
	His son is 16.
	I wonder if he took the jab.
	You know, we just had a football player who was only retired like a couple of years.
	He's still in his late 20s.
	He died suddenly with this stuff.
	And of course, you know, they're bragging about the fact they're forcing everybody to get the vaccine in the NFL. Aaron Rodgers famously pushed back against it.
	But yeah, we're going to talk about that and what's going on with AstraZeneca as well.
	But 13 Reasons Why AR-15s Should Never Be Banned.
	This is by UnitedLiberty.com.
	There's a lot of confusion and misinformation about the AR-15.
	Some people believe its dangerous and deadly weapon has no place in civilian hands.
	As a matter of fact, when you look at these people on TV, they all treat it as if, you know, well, somebody's got the AR-15.
	There's absolutely no way you can stop them.
	But, of course, we saw one shooter who did have an AR-15 was taken down by a guy with a revolver.
	And so, this whole idea to demonize a particular type of firearm, call it an assault weapon because it scares them, I guess.
	Just seeing it is like an assault.
	The reality is the AR-15 is versatile, reliable, popular with gun enthusiasts for a variety of reasons.
	First of all, they said, in spite of what the liberals seem to think, it is not automatic.
	Secondly, it is very commonly used.
	It is commonly used and widely owned.
	It is useful for hunting, unlike the narratives that you hear from Joe Biden.
	I remember years ago, he was trying to push smart guns when he was vice president.
	That was going to be his initiative that he was going to own, his little carve-out.
	And remember, because we played it a lot, you know, ladies, don't get an AR-15.
	Get a shotgun, you know, over and under or side by side or something like that.
	And so people put up pictures of women who were shooting a shotgun that had never shot a shotgun before.
	They didn't realize they needed to put the stock against their arms.
	So they're obviously, you know, newbies and all this stuff or whatever, but it knocking them flat.
	And then they would show...
	Women shooting an AR-15 because it's got very little recoil.
	Sport shooting is also something people use it for.
	But going back to the hunting thing, you know, Joe Biden also putting out this idea.
	Why do you...
	Are the deer wearing bulletproof vests or something?
	What do you need that AR-15 for?
	And it's like, well, if it's a bulletproof vest, I ain't taking the deer down anyway with any of this stuff.
	Useful also for self-defense.
	For many of these same reasons, it's an educational tool, let me point out, because it is easily customized.
	So it's a good platform for teaching gunsmithing and firearm modification.
	Which the ATF really hates.
	Precision is very good.
	Again, it's customizable.
	They already had that in there before.
	But it's got a lot of safety features that you might not have on some other rifles.
	It has a big economic impact for the firearms industry because so many people buy and own them.
	It is of historical significance.
	I did not realize that this has been in production since the 1960s.
	I guess it took a while for it to catch on, but it's been around for quite some time.
	And I think a lot of people think, and a lot of leftists think the AR is for automatic rifle or something, but it's not.
	It's Armalite. It's range of use for civilian, sport shooting, for hunting, and all the rest of the stuff.
	And here's number 13. It's the constitutional right.
	That's the one that matters.
	Of course, I guess they could put in 14.
	According to Kristi Noem, it's great for shooting dogs, but we won't joke about that.
	I mean, what an idiot.
	I mean, does she not remember how Mitt Romney got harangued for putting a dog, talking about how he had put a dog on the top of his station wagon or something?
	I forget the details of it.
	They were moving or something like that.
	And everybody always, what?
	What did she think?
	Went to put something like that in there.
	Absolutely tone deaf and stupid.
	Texas detective says, turning off your phone means that you're either the victim of a crime or you're probably in the process of committing one.
	Because I guess if you don't want Big Brother watching you, just like in 1984, you know, if you are trying to sneak around the corner so the Big Brother camera can't see what you're doing, you must be doing something wrong.
	And that's what he said. This is a guy who, evidently, I don't follow the crime blog stuff, but evidently, the case of Mo Wilson, who was a cyclist, and she was killed by Caitlin Armstrong, who was just convicted and sentenced to 90 years in prison.
	The detective was interviewed on CBS News.
	So when compiling the evidence and piecing together the string of events to determine who the murderer was, how, when, and why it was committed, apparently one of the tip-offs was the murderer lied about her phone's battery dying the night Armstrong carried out the murder.
	Isn't it interesting how all these detectives are conspiracy theorists, in a sense, right?
	They have an idea as to how the crime was committed, and then they look to see if that really was it.
	But they, you know, they come up with these theories about what happened and that's the basis of their investigation.
	But you're not supposed to do that with the government either.
	However, this was not found to be true.
	And the phone had been deliberately turned off.
	And this was a red flag for the detectives making the statements that in this day and age, if someone turns off their phone or takes it off of a network, then it most likely means that the person is a victim of a crime or a criminal themselves.
	Have they never heard of people putting their phone in airplane mode so they can, they don't get bothered with the radiation while they're sleeping?
	Seriously. I guess we have to be asleep if we don't see the surveillance state coming.
	These people are moving it in every direction.
	Now, you're either a victim or you are committing a crime if you don't have your phone on.
	It should be constantly reporting to these people.
	I mentioned earlier that Ford is getting into trouble with their self-driving thing they call Blue Cruise.
	But yeah, let's go ahead and open up the gates for these semi-trailers.
	There have been two fatal crashes with Blue Cruise.
	It is a driver assistance system, and they've already had two separate fatal crashes, both of them occurring at night.
	But wait a minute. Don't they have radar and laser and all the rest of this stuff?
	Remember when that self-driving car that was, I think it was an Uber car, they were practicing with it in Phoenix, and there was a homeless woman who was jaywalking, and you see it's got a camera looking forward, and it's got a camera looking at the human driver who was not doing anything other than sitting there playing with a phone, playing a game or something with a phone, until the bump bump of running over the jaywalking homeless person.
	And they put that out, and their first excuse was, well, you can see this person.
	You couldn't see them.
	As soon as they came into the headlights, that was too late.
	And everybody said, but wait a minute.
	It doesn't navigate with visual light.
	It's got LIDAR and all these other things there.
	It should have seen that, seen her coming, and it should have applied the brakes.
	Why didn't it do that? And then as people continue to ask questions, it comes out that they had problems with the emergency braking kicking on.
	And so they just disabled it because it wasn't functioning right.
	So, yeah, crashes at night.
	Two separate crashes that killed two different people with the Blue Cruise driver assist.
	It was introduced in 2021.
	It's supposed to offer hands-free driving assistance on pre-mapped divided highways.
	Unlike Tesla's autopilot, Blue Cruise has a more restricted operational design domain.
	They call that odd. I think it is odd.
	Anyway, that's the acronym.
	Incorporates an infrared driver monitoring system to ensure drivers keep their eyes on the road.
	Except it doesn't always work as advertised, like most of this stuff.
	And then finally here, how robots making your burgers and fries can lead to greater income inequality.
	Now, this is from the LA Times.
	This is an article that was picked up by Drudge.
	So you can imagine that it's got kind of a leftist tilt to it in some regards.
	But it is interesting because they understand, as I was saying, that Gavin Newsom's minimum wage law was really about putting robots in these fast food restaurant chains.
	You know, it used to be that when I was growing up, we had kids in high school.
	I mentioned that I worked a little bit at Red Lobster, but I had other jobs.
	But, you know, I mentioned it when Red Lobster was going out of business.
	But all the kids that I knew in high school, we all had jobs.
	And we used those jobs to buy cars, because that was our ticket to ride, our ticket for freedom.
	And yet, what do we see now?
	You know, for the longest time, the entry-level jobs, like working at a fast food place or something like that, have gone to illegal immigrants who come in, and they're content to, I guess, work at these fast food jobs for the rest of their life.
	Something that was typically just viewed being an entry-level thing, and now it's become something that people do and continue to do that.
	They don't move on to some other job.
	It's not just something that high school kids are doing.
	And now we see that that is moving and being replaced.
	Those people are being replaced.
	The cheap labor that these corporations wanted.
	That's why they opened up the border.
	They want to get people coming in.
	That even though it's very cheap compared to what Americans are thinking, it is much more than they were making in the country where they came from.
	But now those people are going to be pushed out by robots.
	And this has been the progression that we've seen for a long time, seen this coming.
	And so then what do those people do when they're pushed out of this job with robots?
	So now, you know, high school kids are not getting any work experience or work ethic.
	They're not getting cars, independence.
	Instead, we're going to have robots.
	And that's what this is about. How robots making your burgers and fries can lead to greater income inequality.
	And just keep people from having any upward mobility at all.
	On April 1st, it wasn't interesting that Newsom did this on April Fool's Day.
	Raising, significantly raising.
	You know, by 30%, one-third, they went from $15 an hour to $20 an hour just for the fast food chains that are national.
	Because he's trying to push them and goad them Into making the economic decision to use robots in the kitchen.
	And we see now a lot of different robots that have the manual dexterity and the smarts to be able to do.
	I showed you one the other day.
	It was chopping up food.
	It was flipping pancakes in the pan.
	Opening bottles and things like that.
	And so they're at the point now where they can start replacing some of the labor.
	And he wants to give them a financial incentive to do that, because that's what he's really concerned about helping.
	He's not concerned about helping the people that are at the bottom who are working in fast food.
	He wants to help the Silicon Valley companies sell robots.
	And so on April Fool's, more than half a million fast food workers in California got a raise up to $20 an hour.
	That same week, the self-proclaimed world's first autonomous restaurant opened its doors for business in Pasadena.
	So yeah, he's not trying to help people at the bottom.
	He's trying to help the elites up at the top, the technocrats.
	Fast food franchise owners are struggling to stay afloat amid rising labor costs.
	Because he's jacking them up, leading many of them to consider automation as the only viable solution.
	That's why he's pushing the big chains.
	He said, if this is a chain, even if you don't own 80 stores, even if you're a franchisee and you've got three or four stores, if you're a McDonald's franchisee where they've got more than 80 stores worldwide, then you're going to be covered by this.
	To make sure that McDonald's is going to come up with some kind of a robot program that everybody will be forced to buy into.
	This person says, I studied low wage industries in L.A. Including the effects of new technology on workers.
	My research shows how automation does not always lead to greater efficiency and cost-cutting for businesses, as AI boosters would like the public and policy makers to believe.
	No, it actually makes more money for the people who are selling robots.
	This kind, and they don't sell them.
	They're going to rent them.
	Okay? Because that's the key to really getting wealthy.
	Not selling something, but leasing it.
	So that you will never own anything.
	That is a big part of the new normal for them.
	This kind of innovation also promises to further income inequality.
	Working people deserve to have their voices heard in determining how, where, when, or whether AI and automation should be used.
	This person is writing from the perspective that the unions are going to fix this for us.
	We'll talk about that in a moment here.
	I was eager to visit Cali Express, the new roboticized Pasadena restaurant, to learn what the future of fast food looked and tasted like.
	Outside, there were slogans befitting a traveling circus.
	AI frying robot marvel.
	It's not a flying robot.
	That's what my son wanted when he was little.
	They didn't watch TV much at all.
	And so we asked him when he was little, he said, what do you want for Christmas?
	And he said, I want a flying robot.
	I said, what else do you want?
	If he could imagine it, he thought he could get it.
	AI frying robot marvel.
	Same son. We go to a restaurant, a Chinese restaurant.
	We used to go there. It was a local restaurant.
	Small local restaurant.
	And, you know, he was maybe about four years old or something.
	And he liked to wear his Batman costume.
	And we'd let him wear it anywhere.
	You know, we didn't care. It's like, you want to go grocery shopping with Batman?
	Sure. So we let him wear it to the restaurant because he wanted to.
	And so he's sitting there and the waiter, who was Chinese, came over and he goes, you going to fry?
	And he says, what? He goes, you're going to fry?
	And he looks at us and he says, I don't know what he's saying.
	Anyway, so they have an AI frying robot marvel.
	So I don't know if it's flying or frying.
	Anyway, my curiosity peaked.
	I entered and passed by a facial recognition scanner advertising the ominous sounding opportunity to pay with your face.
	Isn't that great?
	You can pay with your face.
	So, yeah, that's basically what you're doing on social media, you know.
	You're paying with your face for Facebook.
	The dumb effers, as he said, the dumb Facebookers is what he was calling them, actually, right?
	But you pay with your face.
	You pay with your privacy.
	You pay dearly to use those social media things.
	Anyway, he says, I went through and I placed my order on a giant touchscreen, watched a human worker spring into action behind the counter.
	They rushed to load up robots with raw beef and frozen fries, and they scrambled around the kitchen retrieving cooked items that the robots had deposited in the buckets.
	Then this person manually assembled, packaged, and delivered the food to waiting customers.
	A second worker cleaned up after the robots.
	Oh, there you go.
	Isn't that great? Sounds like really fulfilling work, doesn't it?
	I mean, you know, cooking, you know, short order cook or whatever, cooking this stuff, that's not really a challenging thing necessarily, but, you know, certainly does beat just having to be the person who keeps stacking the frozen fries into the robot area.
	As all this is happening, an animatronic arm put on a show reminiscent of a kooky science fair project.
	Hastily dunking a fry basket into a vat of hot oil, the workers toiled away in the background, doing the majority of the work.
	See, that's the key thing that I thought was interesting about this.
	Just like the walkout stores of Amazon, right?
	There's a lot of smoke, mirror, and fraud.
	Involved in a lot of this stuff.
	You know, Jeff Bezos didn't have some magical technology there.
	Kind of a dog and pony show like what Tesla was pulling himself.
	Nikola Tesla, yeah, 120 years ago with his little remote control robot.
	Yeah, just talk to it. Ask it questions and it'll blink back the answers to you.
	He had somebody with a remote control.
	They'd never seen a remote control.
	They didn't Didn't know what was going on with it, but they were very impressed.
	And so that was kind of, you know, what Jeff Bezos and Amazon, Whole Foods were doing with their just walkout stores.
	They had 1,000 Indians watching people shop and totaling it up and then pretending that it was all automated.
	You know, had one little Indian, 10 little Indians, 1,000 little Indian shoppers there.
	He says, Can be used as a pretense for restructuring industries and infrastructure, often at the expense of workers, consumers, and the community.
	And again, it's because the only concern is the wealth for the very, very few.
	He says, not only is this not a great deal for the workers...
	He said consumers end up paying more for less, as automation requires high levels of standardization.
	In fast food, what this means is smaller menus and not as much minimal customization.
	Food prices will continue to skyrocket, just as they have over the last decade, far outpacing the rate of inflation and boosting corporate profits to unprecedented new heights.
	He said my order at Cali Express is He just ordered a burger and a fries, and that was the extent of their menu.
	Milk Coke, Pepsi, right?
	That type of thing. It came out to $15.44, which is more than double the same order at In-N-Out Burgers, where they can make it a lot of different ways because you're dealing with people.
	As profits boom for these multinational conglomerates, local franchisees may feel pressured by the franchise company to automate.
	But to fully renovate a commercial kitchen requires enormous and risky capital investment, plunging already struggling small businesses into new debt.
	So who actually gains from all of this stuff?
	The new class of techno middlemen.
	Who are going to lease the hardware and they're going to have subscription-based software because you will own nothing.
	Even the people who are the business owners who have the franchises and things like that, they won't own this stuff.
	They'll be leasing it from the big guys.
	You know, they have known for the longest time that's the way to make money.
	You know, we had, as I've said before, we had video stores.
	We opened up in 1986, and then when they started pushing for control, the movie studios wanted to get control.
	And, of course, the key ones to push for that control was Paramount, who summed to Redstone, who owned Viacom.
	Viacom was a holding company for Paramount, but they also bought Blockbuster.
	Okay? And so, you know, Viacom owned a lot of different things.
	CBS, Paramount, Blockbuster, a lot of those things.
	And so, they wanted to establish, all the movie studios wanted to establish a situation where they never gave up ownership of the movies.
	They always just rented them.
	And so they wanted to have a pay-per-view rental thing, where they put the stuff there, and it made it very difficult for anybody to make money off of it if they bought into that situation.
	But they used the pressure and the financial clout of Paramount to push that, even though Blockbuster never made any money off of that.
	Blockbuster, after Paramount took it, it was profitable before they bought it, but after it was bought by Viacom, never made any money.
	I just saw the other day that now Sumner Redstone, who was the CEO at the time, he's died and his daughter is there.
	But Paramount's gone out of business now.
	And other movie studios are having a lot of problems as well.
	You know, Warner Brothers is having a lot of problems.
	But they wanted to drive everybody out of business.
	They wanted to make sure that they got all of the money, which is what they do with the movie theaters as well.
	But they're putting out of business as well.
	You know, you look at the movie theaters, the only way they can make any money is off of selling popcorn and concession stands.
	Because they take almost all the ticket price and they keep all that money for themselves.
	They don't own the movie.
	They just rent it for a short period of time.
	And so they are allowed to have a deal set up with them.
	They don't even own the posters and the standees that they put in a lobby about the movies.
	That all goes back to the studios.
	It truly is amazing. It's about total control.
	And that's the way these multinational corporations, these large Wall Street corporations, that's the way they operate.
	They don't want you to own anything.
	And you look at the software models of Adobe and other ones, how they don't want to sell it anymore.
	They want you to rent it constantly from them.
	It's a leasing agreement. The companies developing the technology have raised billions of dollars to impose their solutions, quote-unquote, On to the unwitting public, and how do they do that?
	Typically with the help of the government, partnering with them, banning what their competitors are doing, or banning what has always been out there, you know, just like we're talking about with food, with meat, and other things like that.
	This is what the technocracy wants.
	Now, up to this point, I'm pretty much in agreement, and this is where we go our separate ways with this article, because he thinks that, fortunately, California has a reputation for taking bold policy action.
	So this guy sees the California government as having a solution to all this, and the California government as being the ally of the little guy.
	Nothing could be further from the truth.
	They said they established the state's first sectoral bargaining councils.
	So, are the unions going to save us, or are they just another layer of parasites and cronyism?
	And it's this partnership between government and the corporations that is really dangerous.
	Newsom's recent executive order.
	This guy likes this.
	It's an executive order.
	Mandating AI-powered overhaul of state government operations and public services is one example.
	Yeah, so he's going to fix this.
	He's going to use AI for state government operations and public services, which is another one of the plans of the technocracy.
	It's what Bill Gates has always been pushing.
	An NDO with the Adhar system.
	Let me help you to impose...
	An ID on all the citizens.
	We've seen it there in India, the Adhar system.
	We've seen Ukraine talking about how, yeah, when the war is over, we're going to have anything that you do with the government, you're going to have to have, it's going to be so convenient, you're going to love this.
	We're going to have this digital ID and an app.
	And so instead of having to go stand in line at the Department of Motor Vehicles, you just use your app and you're all done.
	Except they're going to be taking away your ability to drive and everything else.
	They're going to be surveilling you everywhere you go.
	They're going to require an ID. So this is how we get suckered into these things.
	Again, this is an LA Times opinion piece.
	So it was interesting until the very end, at which point he absolutely goes off the rails.
	We'll be right back. Whether you're feeling like the blues.
	Really? Or bluegrass.
	APS Radio has you covered.
	Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APSradio.com.
	Welcome to the APSradio.com.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	show.
	you All right, welcome back.
	Let's talk a little bit about the pharma issue.
	And we've had some developments from big pharmaceutical companies.
	Johnson& Johnson is now proposing to pay $6.5 billion to resolve almost all of the ovarian cancer lawsuits based on people who use their baby powder.
	And it's not just ovarian cancer.
	Of course, there are respiratory issues as well with that.
	The key thing is that with this talcum powder, they knew for a very long time about this.
	And they continued to advertise it anyway.
	And then after it became more prevalent, they stopped the advertising.
	But they continued to sell it.
	Kind of the same type of thing they did with opioids.
	And of course we know about the Sackler family and Purdue Pharmaceutical and how much money they made and how ruthless the marketing of that was everywhere.
	And yet they were actually using Johnson& Johnson to manufacture it for them.
	That's why I said, you know, when Trump brought them in, In 2020, I said, do you realize the history of this company?
	Of course, you know, most of them have got a long list of criminal lawsuits and charges against them, just like the banks do.
	But, you know, it was almost as if Trump had come in with Johnson& Johnson and was like, you know, I know you've got these problems with the opioid stuff and you've got problems with the baby powder stuff.
	How about we get you into a business where you've got no liability?
	I can set you up with vaccines.
	And they did. They got them allied with another small vaccine company.
	They turned over factories to them.
	We've seen this type of thing before as well.
	I talked about it with Chobani Yogurt.
	This guy comes in and Chuck Schumer and Kristen Gilbran get him a factory in New York.
	To make yogurt. Isn't that nice?
	When you've got friends in the federal government that can just give you factories at discount prices like that, set you up in business.
	What do they want in return?
	Well, in his particular case, it was immigration-based.
	But going back to this, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson is proposing to pay nearly $6.5 billion to resolve nearly all the talc ovarian cancer lawsuits brought against the company.
	They said it would resolve about 99.75% of the pending lawsuits brought against it and its affiliates over the allegations.
	It also announced in 2022 that it would stop selling its talc-based baby powder in 2023 amid the ongoing legal battles over the product.
	Think about that. For decades, they continued to do it.
	And then when they finally come out and say in 2022, well, we'll stop selling it.
	A year from now.
	A year from now. Isn't that amazing?
	That they continued to do it that long?
	Isn't it amazing that somebody would continue to market and sell some kind of a health product long after the harm was known?
	Does that sound familiar? Yeah.
	Is that what's going on with all the vaccines?
	As a matter of fact, we look at what is happening in Canada and the UK. They're now, it's to the point where the harm has now been shown and has come out.
	In both Canada and the UK, however, it's about AstraZeneca.
	AstraZeneca evidently was not as well-connected politically as Pfizer and Moderna.
	The AstraZeneca vaccine was the one that came out of the UK. AstraZeneca was a company, and they partnered with Oxford University to put this thing out.
	And they never allowed it in the United States, not because they were concerned about safety, of course.
	They didn't have a political constituency here.
	But it was pretty obviously not a safe vaccine, and they just didn't have the political clout to keep that thing going, so they shut it down in most countries eventually.
	And now you've got Canada and the UK looking at people who were harmed by this AstraZeneca vaccine.
	They have admitted it now in court.
	That harmed people and was killing people.
	But still, they're dragging their feet on any compensation.
	Canada's COVID vaccine injury program so far has only paid out 6% of the claims so far.
	So that's like 1 out of every 17 claims.
	And they're not paying much money either.
	Only 138 of the 2,233 claims made so far have been approved for payout.
	And the amounts that they're paying people are paltry sums.
	Trudeau, as a matter of fact, recently tabled a 2024 budget that earmarked an extra $36 million for the program.
	He doesn't want to pay people for the vaccine that he pushed on people.
	Isn't that amazing? Some people who are successful in getting payouts have said that the compensation awarded was insufficient considering the injuries.
	42-year-old Ross Reitman from British Columbia had a lawsuit against AstraZeneca and the federal government of Canada and the government of its province and the pharmacy at which he was injected.
	But he's not getting much of anything from any of them.
	He received the AstraZeneca shot in April of 2021.
	Shortly after that, he became totally paralyzed.
	He was subsequently diagnosed with Guillain-Barre syndrome.
	This has been a very long-known side effect of many different vaccines.
	Going back to the 1970s when they had the swine flu and that stuff, Fake pandemic of the swine flu and the vaccine that harms so many people.
	Remember, we had the 60 Minutes thing by Mike Wallace, Chris Wallace's father.
	And the person, one of the key people that he interviewed in that had been paralyzed with Guillain-Barre syndrome and was gradually getting back use of her legs.
	But she... I was never going to be able to do anything other than walk with braces and things like that.
	This has been around for a long time, but we've never seen it to the extent that we saw it in this.
	So we've had all of these typical vaccine injuries, but far, far worse than we'd ever seen it before, plus all of the new types of injuries.
	Whitman was given a one-time payout of $250,000 and about $90,000 a year in income replacement.
	That's going to be eaten up with inflation.
	Given the extent of the permanent life-changing injuries, a couple hundred thousand dollars isn't much.
	He says that's for sure.
	The Canadian federal government is also continuing to purchase COVID shots.
	Isn't that amazing? Continuing to purchase them, even though...
	Nobody wants the boosters anymore.
	And this is something else that we've seen.
	Over and over again, they continue to buy this stuff.
	And they continue to buy...
	We saw this in Australia.
	It is also the case in other countries that they buy 10 times the case of what people are complaining about with Ursula fond of lying in the EU. She bought 10 times The doses of vaccine as the population, just like they did in Australia. It's like they're planning, and we reported this when it happened.
	I reported it when it happened.
	We had said, think about how many of these shots they want to give people.
	They're buying 10 times the number of people that they've got.
	They're not going to hit you just one or two times.
	The UK government, again, caught playing hardball over the vaccine injury payouts as the victims' legal bills mount.
	And again, this is AstraZeneca.
	And this is another 40-something father who was young, healthy, had a family, was supporting them, working, fighting for their lives.
	And having life-altering injuries.
	Jamie Scott is nothing if not a fighter.
	He must be to have survived a reaction to his Trump shot.
	So violent that hospital doctors phoned his wife three times to tell her to get to his bedside because he was about to die.
	But each time he pulled through.
	Actually, this is not a Trump shot.
	This is the AstraZeneca shot.
	Fit and healthy before the jab.
	The 47-year-old father of two has suffered a permanent brain injury.
	That prevents him from working or even being able to look after his children on his own for anything more than an hour.
	The battle to stay alive was won.
	However, it was just the beginning.
	He is now struggling to do anything in his life.
	And so, hang on a second, just lost my spot here in...
	I haven't got this memorized, so I wanted to read this next section to you, and I'm having trouble finding it here.
	Maybe we should play some music here.
	Anyway, this week, AstraZeneca has confirmed a couple of things.
	First one is that they're going to pay their CEO 18.7 million pounds in compensation.
	And the UK Telegraph obtained court documents that showed the pharmaceutical firm was admitting for the first time in legal proceedings that its vaccine can, quote, in very rare cases.
	No, they got that. That's a Fauci thing.
	It's rare. You know, it's rare.
	In very rare cases, it can cause an illness which is fatal about 20% of the time.
	So once you get this illness, it is not rare to die from it.
	When its symptoms of blood clots and low blood plate counts are not deadly, it leaves the victims with devastating injuries.
	In these same legal documents, AstraZeneca accepts that it has no idea why the vaccine, developed in conjunction with the University of Oxford, has no idea why the vaccine should do that.
	Well, see, this is why we have tests, right?
	This is why they would go through three phases of testing, so that you would know if it was harmful, and so that you would know that it was actually causing this problem.
	But they did it at warp speed because they skipped the testing.
	They said, the causal mechanism is not known, said the company.
	Well, I think we do know the cause of all this.
	I think this is caused by politicians, don't you?
	I mean, I don't have to get a microscope to figure out this is caused by politicians who force this on us.
	And if we know anything at all about history and documents and what these people have been doing for the last 20-plus years, we know exactly why they did this.
	It was politicians who did this, and no doubt about it.
	On Rumble, Foggy Trail says, I've been posting about vaccines for over 15 years.
	Yeah. And my in-laws thought I was nuts.
	They still think I'm crazy.
	Even though several of them have health issues from the COVID jab.
	That's a shame. You just can't get through to people like that.
	On Rumble, Michael DeSilvio.
	My co-worker vomited and lost control of his bowels as soon as he was jabbed.
	Later that night, he had a stroke.
	And it's covered up in it, right?
	It's covered up. They wanted everybody to believe that this is unrelated, that it was a fluke, that this wasn't happening to anybody else.
	This is why when we look at freedom of speech, it's not just an abstract thing.
	It is fundamental.
	It is the way that we defeat this tyranny is with freedom of speech and being able to talk to and communicate with each other.
	That's why that is the key thing they want to shut down.
	And it's why it's such a betrayal.
	What Mike Johnson and these other people are doing.
	To take these riots that are happening and say, well, they've had too much to say.
	We've got to shut down what people say.
	You've had too much to think.
	You've had too much to say.
	I'm not going to let you talk about this stuff anymore.
	So the legal mess has been made more complicated in the UK because the government indemnified AstraZeneca.
	In other words, they got immunity.
	The people they jabbed didn't get immunity, but they got legal immunity for the harm that they caused.
	So it indemnified AstraZeneca and other COVID vaccine makers ahead of the mass rollout, and of course they planned that for the longest time.
	First thing Fauci did, Give them immunity for the childhood vaccines in 1986 and then in 2005 as part of the PrEP Act George W. Bush He made sure that there was even more immunity given to people for these vaccines
	that would be rolled out as part of a massive pandemic or something.
	And so he made sure that, you know, there's going to be nothing, no liability for the companies or for the government that was a co-conspirator in all of this.
	In the legal case, AstraZeneca is accused of playing hardball, but it is unclear whether behind the scenes the UK Treasury is balking at any payout.
	But for the victims, it just prolongs their agony.
	That's exactly right.
	And so, when we look at the side effects that are there, you know, as I pointed out, and I corrected, I was talking about remdesivir and saying that it was a liver thing, because I'd seen a lot of people that had liver injury, and you can find a lot about remdesivir injuring people's liver, but I had a listener who said, well, no, it's the kidneys are the main thing.
	And I looked up, and he's like, yeah, they're right, that is the main thing.
	But it also comes after your liver as well.
	It's like these vaccines.
	So, is the main thing the blood clots?
	Is it anaphylactic shock?
	Is it the myocarditis and the pericarditis?
	Is it the long amyloid blood clots, the long, white, stringy, rubbery things that accumulate?
	And we go on and on with all these different symptoms.
	Yes, all of the above. Which one is the main way to kill people?
	I'm not sure, actually.
	Which one is the main death thing?
	We've got a lot of people dying suddenly, but that could be from the blood clots or it could be from the myocarditis.
	It could be from a lot of different things.
	I think it is the myocarditis.
	I think people have that and they don't realize until they go out and exercise strenuously just how fragile their heart was.
	That's why it's young people are dropping dead suddenly, young athletes.
	But we've got another symptom now coming from the Trump shots.
	And this is an elevated risk of eye inflammatory disorder.
	And I thought this was very interesting because earlier we were talking about cow flu, they want to call it now, right?
	The bird flu, avian flu.
	Oh, well, we've had one case in a human being where it jumped from the bird to the cow and then jumped from the cow to the human.
	And what did the human get?
	Got a redness in their eye, and then it was reported by some other people as conjunctivitis, pink eye, right?
	That's not a big deal, really.
	Now, there is something that looks like pink eye, which is more serious.
	Pink eye conjunctivitis is an external infection of your eye.
	Whereas this other condition is uvitis is an internal inflammation inside of the eye.
	And that's more difficult to treat, so it's more serious.
	But they have many of the same symptoms.
	And so it can be difficult to distinguish if somebody's got a pink eye or if they've got uvitis.
	One is external, the other is internal.
	But they look the same. Same symptoms.
	So this person, we've got one person supposedly, and again, that tells you that as widespread as they claim the bird flu is, if only one person has shown up with it, that's probably not what that one person has.
	Just thinking critically here.
	And what else might have caused this?
	Because now they're saying that this uvitus, which can look like pink eye, is another symptom of COVID vaccination.
	They found that 17% of nearly a half million people who had been vaccinated, 474,000, who have a history of uvitus, And a recurrence within one year after a vaccination.
	So not only do you get it from it, but it can come back later after you've been vaccinated.
	Again, it is an inflammation inside the eye that occurs in the immune system is fighting an infection or something like that.
	So if you get the shot, you might get the eye infection.
	And then later on, if you're fighting another infection because it's damaged your immune system, you may wind up getting this.
	And they found it in about 17% of the people.
	And it can look like pink eye.
	So is this person that they're claiming that caught the bird flu from a cow?
	Or drink the bat soup from a pangolin?
	Is this really another vaccine symptom that this guy had?
	Of the 474,000 individuals included in the study, cumulative incidence of post-vaccination uitis was 8.6% at three months, 12.5% at six months, 17% at one year.
	In other words, it's going up.
	Long after you got the vaccine, it's going up.
	And it was primarily of the anterior type, which is at the front of the eye.
	So again, it's going to look very much like pink eye.
	And then we have Pfizer-Gate with Ursula Fond of lying, proving, as this headline says, that she can get away with anything.
	This is RT talking about the fact that she had all these dodgy communications with Albert Borla of Pfizer.
	They were texting back and forth, and eventually she wound up signing a contract where she bought 10 doses for every European at the expense of the European Union.
	And she profited from it.
	And she was also pushing out the QR code to require people to have proof of vaccination to do anything.
	You know, the vaccine passport.
	And so people want to know what's going on with this massive amount of money.
	It was 4.6 billion vaccines that she bought.
	71 billion euros of public money.
	That she gave to her friends in Big Pharma.
	And yet, first of all, she wasn't really interested in showing them the text messages between her and Borla.
	And then they just somehow disappeared.
	And we don't really know what happened with it.
	But isn't this interesting? Ten doses for every European she bought.
	And we saw the same thing in Australia.
	Ten doses for every Australian.
	Wow. I remember talking about that in 2020.
	The fact that, hey, this thing is, they're not looking to end any of this stuff.
	Anytime soon.
	And on Rumble Atomic Dog says, my sister-in-law was paralyzed by blood clots.
	I'm very sorry. Can't walk now.
	Oh. Refuses to believe that it was a jab.
	It's sad. The blood clots do not run in the family.
	Yeah. Well, you know, a lot of times it's difficult for people to, you know, they don't want to believe that there's anything that they did.
	Even if they were fooled, they would not want to do that.
	Other people, on the other hand, I was like, you know, fool me once.
	Okay, now I'm on to you.
	And that's going to be the thing that's going to help us.
	The fact that people have looked at this.
	Now, this is, and I saw this come up yet again.
	This was just released yesterday.
	A renowned scientist said all COVID-vaxxed people will die in three to five years.
	Now, I've heard this, and I've heard other people quote it.
	I've heard Alex quote this as well.
	Even though this person is a world-renowned scientist, I don't go on credentials.
	And I think that they've got very good reason to say that there's going to be a lot of stuff that's going to continue to increase.
	The cancer is going to increase. It's going to continue to accelerate.
	We're going to see other issues like infertility, even pink eye coming back, you know, an eye infection coming back and getting more and more frequent as time goes by over every six-month period.
	I think we're going to continue to see this, and people are going to just discount it and say, well, I don't know.
	Is it the food? Is it this?
	Is it 5G? What is it?
	You know, we don't know. Well, I think this poison is just going to keep doing this.
	It's damaged a lot of people's immune system.
	It is persistent.
	And a lot of people have gotten a lot of jabs with this as well.
	But I don't know that we should go this absolutist on anything.
	And so I don't agree with this, that everyone who's been vaccinated with the COVID shots will die within three to five years, is what the person said, going back to 2021.
	Which would mean, at the mean point, you know, that'd be four years.
	That would be in 2025, kind of center of it.
	And I, you know, I don't believe, and I'm not saying that everybody's going to die, but I think it's going to really accelerate.
	And I think it's very interesting, and we've talked about this briefly in the past, the Deagle thing, you know?
	It was really strange. That person had connections with the CIA who put that up.
	And, you know, really, it's like, what is this about?
	Who is this person? Why are they putting this up?
	And why are they talking about the number of people that are going to die by different countries?
	And, of course, the U.S. is...
	A few of the places, they said population was going to go up, but in the United States, they said it was going to be radically reduced by about two-thirds.
	The U.K., almost as bad.
	Who took the lead in these vaccines?
	Trump, Boris Johnson, and other people like that.
	This person with CIA, of course, working with these intelligence agencies that are part of the English-speaking five countries, maybe they knew what they were going to be pulling off.
	And when you look at this, you know, it was not the, you know, the pandemic, the health threat was always the shot.
	The shot was the bioweapon.
	All this stuff about the labs and everything is at this point a red herring.
	And so when you look at that, I don't think that you can say that everybody who got vaccinated with even a single shot is going to die.
	I don't think that's going to be the case.
	It's never the case. It's one of the reasons why you can get away with stuff like this.
	Because you look at this and how people will react to being exposed to stuff that will kill one person.
	The other person may not even get sick.
	That's one of the reasons why it's difficult to prove this stuff.
	And when it gradually rolls out over a period of time and when it continues to get more and more intense in terms of the people who are harmed by it, that is something else that makes it difficult for people to get this.
	But it was Professor Cahill, Dr.
	Dolores Cahill out of Germany, And I think she's got, she worked with the Max Planck Institute of Molecular Genetics in Berlin, Germany from 1996 to 2003.
	Has several international patents in this field.
	So clearly, technically she knows what she's talking about, but I think that anybody can make a mistake, and I think if you're looking at the medicine side of this, epidemiological side of this, no matter what you're talking about, it's not going to kill everybody.
	But again, we need to understand what has been pulled on us, and that's the thing that continues to gnaw at me, that Biden and Trump and all of these Republican and Democrat Congress people who all had a hand in this are not being held to account.
	And again, we're not doing anything to stop the elevation of this from the state and federal governments to the international level with the WHO. I think the best thing that we could do is to start contacting,
	we talked about this this week, Jay and Jessica contacted me by email and said, hey, we need to put this stuff out and start pushing on state representatives To withdraw some of these powers.
	And I think we probably could even do that perhaps at the local level.
	Because there are local public health places, public health bureaucrats, who have been, some of them better, some of them worse than others.
	But these regulations that were put out in December of 2001, after the anthrax attack and 9-11 and all the rest of this stuff...
	These are the things that if we destroy that, I think we could cut off this pandemic being imposed from above.
	And that includes at the global level especially.
	I think it'd cut it off for the federal government, it'd cut it off for the state government.
	If the state government would cut it off, those regulations, it'd cut it off for the federal government and certainly for the international government.
	Have a good day. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
	This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
	Break free from the usual script with The David Knight Show, a fresh perspective bringing you genuine insights on current events.
	But if the show is going to stay on the air, we'll need your continued support.
	Sharing the show, subscribing, and even just hitting the like button all help.
	And if you found our show helpful, Please consider donating and becoming a part of a community that values the truth.

▲