Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 1, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:02:01

The David Knight Show - 05/01/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds You're listening to The David Night Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's...
	What?
	It's what day is it? Wednesday!
	It's May Day. May Day, May Day.
	We have lots of control here.
	Year of our Lord, 2024.
	Well, today, we are going to try to explain what is happening with the campus wars.
	We see the Palestinian squatters coming.
	Yes, we all kind of saw this in the bill, didn't we?
	After a few days, three and a half billion dollars for refugee resettlement as part of the Israel package.
	Well, now they're pushing really hard.
	They want you to believe that they're concerned about what's happening on the college campuses, and yet they're going to do massive migration of Palestinians coming into the country.
	We'll also take a look at the USDA. It's doing a real power play to take away meat and milk with this bird flu stuff.
	And there's another big power play going on with a green agenda.
	ESG may be gone, but hope remains for BlackRock and Larry Fink that he can get in on the ground floor of a power scam.
	We'll explain that to you as well.
	Let's begin with the campus war stuff.
	Thank you.
	I liked what Babylon Bee had.
	They said, the world watched in horror last night as a large group of indoctrinated woke extremists destroyed a woke extremist indoctrination center.
	Columbia University, it's been this way for a long time.
	I guess now we're concerned because it's not just about destroying America, although it is.
	It's very much about destroying America.
	But, you know, I'll show you what they did to the George Washington statue.
	It's very much about this hatred.
	And the groups that are using this, both groups, are about destroying America.
	But for the longest time, this kind of hatred and vitriol, it's not okay to be white.
	But now that it's not okay to be Jewish, we've got to do something about it.
	That's the issue here.
	And the thing that we've got to do about it is we've got to shut down free speech.
	Don't shut down these indoctrination centers.
	Don't cut off their money, although some private donors have.
	No, let's shut down free speech.
	They will always use these manufactured problems to impose a solution that is an even bigger problem.
	We didn't see this coming, said one official, after spending decades of brainwashing young, impressionable people into volatile, savage revolutionaries.
	We were shocked to see them unleash such volatility and savagery while trying to launch a revolution.
	We wish there had been some warning signs.
	Students engaged in the violent attack.
	One of them said, I owe everything to this place.
	I could never have grown into the angry, destructive, violent person I am without the education I received here.
	Can you help me set this place on fire?
	Folks, it's not just the universities.
	It is also America that they want to set on fire.
	As a matter of fact, one person went to their encampment, and this is what they've done to the statue of George Washington at George Washington University.
	It's not Columbia. This is spread to a lot of different college campuses.
	But, you know, George Washington University, that's where we go to get our Supreme Court justices.
	This is the statue of George Washington on George Washington University's campus.
	And this statue happens to be in the middle of the pro-Palestinian encampment on the university.
	Yeah, look at that. They like him as much as they do Robert E. Lee.
	Yeah. Everybody.
	Yeah. It's a genocidal warmonger.
	He's a colonizer, I guess.
	Free Palestine. Bring them here to get free stuff.
	That's what we want to do.
	We want to bring Palestine to America.
	We want that kind of unrest in America, don't we?
	Oh, they do. So, you know, these protesters have been doing this for a long time.
	But they were...
	When you look at this particular thing here, are they doing this for humanitarian reasons?
	I mean, I'm seeing a lot of people out there saying, well, this is, you know, defending these draconian measures against them.
	And there's multiple layers on this onion.
	You know, what is right and what is wrong?
	What is the response, the correct response to what is right and what is wrong?
	For the longest time, these humanitarians that are out there and camping to save people from this continued attack on a civilian population, they were absolutely apathetic or they were cheering the attacks on a civilian population by Hamas back in October.
	And when you look at these colleges and these GOP virtue signalers like traitors, Mike Johnson, when you look at all this stuff, and the Jewish donors who now decide that they can't fund these revolutionaries anymore, they had no problem funding them as long as they hated American white people, as long as it was not okay to be white.
	But now, as they're seen as white, as they're seen as the colonizers, oh, we've got to stop funding them.
	They were apathetic or supportive.
	They were giving lots of money to these people who were trying to deconstruct and destroy America, America's history, and other things like that.
	They liked that. That was just fine.
	But don't get anti-Jewish or we'll cut off your money.
	See, this is the problem.
	Is this really about the murder of civilians in October or long extended murder of civilians in Gaza?
	Is it really about humanitarian issues?
	We have, with both Hamas and with the Israeli government under Netanyahu, we have geopolitical leaders who've got their own agenda, just like ours.
	You've got to understand, when these people get us involved in wars, they don't care about you.
	They've got a political agenda.
	And you are expendable.
	As a matter of fact, if somebody, you know, grotesquely murders you or mutilates you or rapes you or whatever, all the much better because now they've got some...
	Something to motivate other people about.
	To get other people involved in supporting this war.
	So yeah, let's bring on the atrocities.
	We can use that.
	We can absolutely use that.
	They don't care. Hamas doesn't care about the Palestinians there in Gaza.
	And Netanyahu doesn't care about the Israelis.
	Now he used them as guinea pigs just most recently with this pandemic stuff.
	But any leader who escalates war, like Biden, doesn't care about his own people.
	Biden doesn't, as he keeps poking the nuclear bear, he doesn't care about Americans at all.
	He's got his underground bunker, and he's got his political agenda.
	And the rest of us be damned.
	He doesn't care about any of us.
	And Netanyahu doesn't care about any of his people.
	And the Hamas leaders don't care about their people.
	This is not about humanitarianism.
	So get that off the table.
	If it was about humanitarianism, they'd be having peace talks.
	They'd be working to try to stop the wars in Israel and in Ukraine instead of increasing the funding to them.
	If this was about humanitarian issues, they'd be closing the border.
	If it was about being loyal to their own people, they'd be doing things like closing the border and stopping the war.
	But it's not about any of that stuff.
	So... Do they have a goal in kicking off this chaos?
	Yes, they do. Yes, they do.
	Because we see that whether it is climate change, MacGuffin, or whether it is the pandemic MacGuffin, or back to the climate change MacGuffin, or whether it's to the war MacGuffin, or whether it's to the college campus war MacGuffin, it's always about going after your speech, isn't it?
	Isn't that interesting? No matter what the problem, they've always got the same solutions, just like the climate stuff.
	For eight or nine years, the world is going to go into a new ice age.
	Well, here's what we've got to do.
	We've got to reduce the number of people, and we've got to get rid of cars, and on and on and on.
	Shut down the power plants.
	Oh, wait, wait, we got it wrong.
	It's going to be not a global ice age, but it's going to be global warming, and the globe is going to melt.
	Okay. The solution's still the same.
	We've got to kill all the people, kill all the cars, and you can't, you know, it's always the same.
	They always have the same goal, they just have a different MacGuffin to get there.
	As soon as people realize that there's no lions on the highlands of Scottish Highlands, then you've got to get another MacGuffin.
	It doesn't work anymore.
	So we're constantly moving this around.
	But it always comes back to shutting down the free speech.
	And so the media is filled with this.
	And quite frankly, when I look at these protests, I no more see them as being anti-war peace protests as I see a satanic temple display set up at Christmas in Indiana.
	Was it Indiana, I think?
	Or Idaho? I don't remember.
	Anyway, one of those states that begins with an I. When somebody sets up a satanic display, there's a faux little thing, which looked like these Palestinian protester encampments at the college campuses.
	When somebody sets up something like that, I'm sorry, that's not a religion.
	They say they don't believe in that, right?
	Well, this is not about what they say it's about either.
	These college protests, and I see all these people.
	I've got an op-ed piece here from Dennis Kucinich.
	And he's on the Free Thought Project.
	He writes this op-ed piece about it.
	Isn't this horrible? These people are reactionary in shutting down free speech on college campus.
	It's like, I'm sorry, they don't believe in that one iota.
	These are the most censorious tyrants I've ever seen in my life.
	These people who are in college, the very people who are out there with these protests.
	They hate free speech more than anybody I've ever seen.
	So don't tell me this is about free speech.
	Don't tell me that the satanic temple is about religion.
	They don't believe that? They admit they don't believe it?
	They hate God? That's why they're doing it.
	These people, you know, it's just not about free speech, but they will use it to attack free speech.
	They'll make it about free speech, and then they'll use it to shut it down.
	That's what the Republicans are doing now.
	And so some people are asking, well, we know that Soros, Is he perhaps organizing this so he can get conservatives like Trader Mike Johnson and Governor Abbott to join the call for censorship?
	If they really want to fix it, the real problem is just the colleges themselves.
	Cut their money off.
	Stop subsidizing them.
	We had colleges before they were subsidized by the government, and guess what?
	The government subsidies have made them into Marxist seminaries by design, just like we were talking about yesterday with Alex Newman, the book that he wrote.
	You want to understand what the Marxist agenda is for education, and that's especially true of college.
	College is really where they indoctrinate the teachers, and so, you know, they go to...
	K-12, they love school so much they want to be a teacher, so they go to college, and then they turn them into Marxist revolutionaries, and then put them back in as teachers.
	They get the next generation.
	They radicalize them far more than they were ever radicalized in college, and then those people go to college, and now by this time we've got college more radical, and they graduate these teachers, and they come back in.
	Look, I know a lot of people that I knew in music, When I was taking a lot of music classes, when I was a music major, before I became an engineering major.
	And, you know, there is no live music anymore, so these people just kind of kicked back and became teachers.
	And they've become radical.
	Really radical.
	LGBT radical leftists, Marxists and everything.
	Just from going through the regular school system and the same college that I attended.
	But it's the institutions.
	And so, why do we continue to fund these institutions?
	Instead, they're going to continue to fund them, and then they're going to use them as a justification For a new method of censorship, as reported the other day, the monitor program from the Department of Education.
	And they've done something similar to this on fishing ships, where people have to pay for a government monitor to watch them and report everything that they do.
	And it's a tremendous expense.
	But, you know, that's what they're going to do.
	That's what they're talking about doing.
	So in Columbia University, the protesters have taken over Hamilton Hall.
	Maybe they could do a musical about that or something.
	A group of anti-Israel protesters at Columbia University have seized the historic Hamilton Hall.
	Well, it's obviously going to be racist and horrible, right, if it's historic.
	It's American history.
	It should be destroyed. What's the problem here?
	Smashing windows, unfurling an intifada banner, and refusing to leave.
	Protesters stormed and occupied the building on the main campus of the Manhattan University after smashing their way into the school.
	The occupation came nearly 12 hours after the deadline of 2 p.m.
	on Monday for protesters to leave or to face suspension.
	So they doubled down.
	So people are comparing it to January the 6th because everything is about polarizing the public, isn't it?
	Oh, look, you know, mostly peaceful, but, you know, they're going to let that go.
	They're, you know, torturing people for January the 6th.
	Look, I understand that. As I said, you don't like the policy that's happening?
	Well, you know, free speech says that there's a lot of different things that you can do.
	Free speech. You should be able to.
	You should be able to write about it.
	You should be able to post it on social media.
	You should be able to have debates on college campus.
	Do they like that when people come in that they disagree with?
	Do they allow debates on college campus?
	No. These people have been radicalized to shut down anybody that they disagree with on any particular topic.
	It's just now the topic that they're talking about is anti-Semitic.
	And so now the university, the people who, big donors, wealthy Jewish donors, well, we're not going to give them any more money.
	But they had no problem when they shut down debate, when they attacked Americans, American history, white people on campus.
	That was fine. Keep giving them money.
	There's something really wrong about all of this, folks.
	We should not be sucked up into this left-right civil war that they're trying to create.
	But here's Elise Stefanik out of New York.
	Holding a press conference, she says, The world is watching as the leadership of our so-called elite colleges and universities continue to fail to condemn anti-Semitism and protect Jewish students on campus.
	But she and her ilk never cared to stop the funding of these Marxist seminaries attacking America, Americans, white people, the rest of the stuff.
	They have been pushing out hatred, civil war, division, censorship, the rest of the stuff.
	She had no problem with it, did she?
	Until it became Jewish.
	And I'm not saying it's okay to do it.
	They should have stopped it a long time ago.
	What I'm saying is they've got some other cards here they're not showing.
	Destroy America, that's fine.
	That's the goal, actually, is to destroy America.
	So last night, the pro-Hamas anti-Semitic mob took over an academic building.
	The university leadership has lost control.
	And so, that's part of what she had to say.
	Well, let's just change this a little bit.
	For the last several years...
	The pro-Marx, climate alarmist, anti-freedom mob has taken over academic buildings.
	And the university leadership has lost complete control.
	And the Republicans are just fine to continue to fund that.
	At the state level, at the federal level.
	But she says, and we as House Republicans will now hold them to account, right?
	Now we've got to do something about it.
	Really? Really? Really?
	Destroy America? That's fine with the GOP, as we see with the border issue and traitor Mike Johnson.
	It's fine if you want to destroy America.
	Don't destroy Israel, though, or anything else like that.
	We've got money for foreign wars, but nothing for the border.
	You want to destroy America?
	That's okay. But if it's anti-Semitism, now we've got to stop it.
	Why? Why the double standard here?
	A Columbia student's lawyer is a Jewish student, unnamed because it is going to be attacked by this Marxist mob.
	The attorney of an anonymous Jewish Columbia student who issued, issuing the university, allegedly not providing a safe educational environment, says his client is having to deal with calls for genocide while attending school.
	And his lawyer says, well, it's fine to debate how Israel should have responded to the Hamas attacks.
	Is it fine? I mean, I've been seeing that called anti-Semitism.
	Don't you say anything about Netanyahu or the government, the political government of Israel?
	Well, that's anti-Semitism.
	Is it fine to talk about it? It should be.
	You've got Jews who are in some of these protests in some of these universities, maybe not Colombia, I don't know.
	But some of them even did Passover Seder during these protests.
	You've got a lot of Orthodox Jews who don't agree politically with Netanyahu.
	You've got, you know, the country is about roughly 50-50 divided itself for and against Netanyahu before this stuff started.
	But they've got stuff out, signs, statements like death to the Jews.
	Again, death to America, that's okay.
	Death to the Jews, however, that is not okay.
	Why is it that we have this double standard?
	Long live Hamas!
	Globalize the Intifada!
	And these are statements that are allowed on Columbia University that the lawyer has put in in terms of this case.
	Saying, you know, you've allowed a very dangerous environment.
	They have cultivated a very dangerous environment against America for a long time.
	Why is it now we care?
	Only now. Only now.
	And so this is the article from Dennis Kucinich.
	The anti-war movement erupts as college students reject the establishment's support for genocide.
	Much like the anti-war protests of the Vietnam era.
	And I agree. I think it is very much like it.
	And I have to say, I think those were very, very counterproductive.
	Growing up in a conservative family that would have normally been very opposed to the Vietnam War, the Vietnam protesters, basically, I watched with the adults in my family, because of these Vietnam protesters, my family, which would have normally had a rational response to war, supported the Vietnam War.
	The Vietnam War was anti-American, just like these protesters were anti-American at the time.
	It's not pro-American, send people off to die for no reason, soldiers.
	To go invade a country that you don't know anything about the history of, that you don't understand.
	To create this false idea of a domino theory, to base all of this stuff on a false flag about the Gulf of Tonkin.
	And I understood because I looked at it, and these people...
	Hated America.
	But what they didn't realize was that our government hated America as well.
	Our government hated America so much that it would rob us of money, and it would rob us of the lives of good young men for no reason at all.
	Robert McNamara had no idea what he was doing.
	Neither did JFK or Lyndon Johnson or Richard Nixon, any of those people.
	None of them. None of them cared about Americans.
	Or they would not have gotten us involved in that war.
	So when I look at all of this stuff, to me it's deja vu all over again.
	You want to stop what's going on in Gaza?
	This is the wrong way to do it.
	Just like it was the wrong way to stop what was going on in Vietnam with these Vietnam War protests.
	It got people to push back against it.
	And the way people are pushing back against it now is they're going to, you know, the conservatives are not going to support Hamas, but they will support the attacks, the Soros attacks on our free speech.
	That's what they'll support in reaction against this.
	Very predictable. So, as Dennis Percentage says, peacefully exercising a constitutional right.
	Well, I don't know.
	Mostly peaceful? This is one of these riot things again.
	Challenging government policies.
	Look, the way you challenge a government policy is not by defacing private property, defacing statues, historical statues that don't have anything to do with your agenda.
	It's not by defacing and defecating on campus.
	It's by debating.
	Oh, but we can't have debates anymore because the same mob will attack anybody they disagree with, right?
	Have a civilized debate.
	You want to talk about it? You want to challenge government policies?
	Well, you don't get out there and, you know, do what these filthy radicals are doing.
	It's counterproductive.
	I've never agreed with these types of protests because I'm just too conservative, huh?
	So, anyway. And we got Speaker Johnson wants to make the same mistakes that they did at Kent State as well.
	Yeah, let's use force to shut this down.
	And they're not going to have any debates.
	There's not going to be any free speech.
	The universities are the problem.
	The universities have been the problem against free speech for a long time.
	And Dennis Kucinich, who was a congressman, He referenced in his op-ed piece here, he referenced Kent State University.
	He said years later, four people were shot in the confusion and some National Guard soldiers shot at the crowd and killed four students.
	Years later, he said, as chairman of a congressional oversight subcommittee, I quietly probed the Kent State shootings, and I learned, as had others before me, that a suspected FBI asset on campus.
	Oh, you mean an undercover guy?
	You mean somebody who is maybe an agent provocateur?
	Right? January 6th is nothing new.
	And if you knew anything about history, you would have told people like I did, stay away from January 6th.
	And there's people like Alex Jones who knew the history and he told people to go.
	Told people to go.
	Judas Goat. It's amazing to me.
	Anyway, they had a suspected FBI asset on campus who was taking pictures of protesters. He found himself suddenly surrounded by students who believed him to be an informant, and he drew his gun. He may have fired shots in the air, which were mistaken as an attack on the Ohio National Guard, which unfortunately had been ordered to campus by the governor, and the guard returned fire, killing four
	students. So, the FBI did it.
	Instigated it. According to Dennis Kucinich, perhaps.
	Right? The Federal Bureau of Instigations says, unfortunately, the FBI did not cooperate with my request to investigate this.
	I'm giving more credence to the testimony that says that they did it.
	Right? They don't want to be investigated in any of this stuff.
	They did not cooperate with my request for further search of records to determine the precise role of its informant, and my term in Congress came to a close.
	So who fired the first shot?
	Was it someone acting as an agent of the government?
	Was it an agent provocateur, as we have seen the FBI do over and over and over and over again?
	And so, LifeSite News talks about the plight of Christians in Gaza.
	Hell on earth, says an insider, inside the overlooked plight of Christians in Gaza.
	So here's the question.
	Do we care because they're Christians?
	Do we only care because they're Christians?
	Do we not care because they're Christians?
	Right? The issue is that when we look at this, the prolonged attack on a civilian population is not justifiable.
	It's not justifiable in war.
	There's different ways to respond to the Hamas attack.
	And this response has clearly been rejected.
	It offends the basic moral sensibilities of people worldwide for an obvious reason.
	It is obviously immoral.
	People understand that somebody initiates an attack, kills an innocent civilian.
	Most people, unless they're highly politicized, like the college campus kids, would condemn that.
	Most people did condemn what happened in October.
	But then when you use that to accomplish some other goal, like removing the people, when you use that to have a prolonged, sustained civilian attack, Then people understand that that itself is also wrong.
	And so, this individual who is talking about the Christians in Gaza, he says that this organization that he's with, he says, they don't want their stand with the people of Gaza to foment anti-Semitism or Jew hatred, but at the same time, it does not want the fear of criticism to silence the group into what he calls an anti-Arab prejudice.
	See, the problem is, I don't see any love or understanding or interest in peace in these protests in Columbia or these other college campuses.
	Do you think that they're all about love and understanding and let's have peace?
	What do we need to do to stop this?
	Is it about that?
	No, it's not about that.
	Let's not pretend it's about that.
	And let's not pretend that the Israeli government or the American government are about that either.
	Neither one of those sides are about that.
	They've all got their own little agenda.
	You know, the Marxists and the George Soros people, you know, they want chaos.
	They want civil war. They want censorship.
	Israel and the U.S. want land.
	They want war.
	They want endless war.
	They want to sell weapons.
	That's what's going on here, folks.
	This is why I've not jumped into this stuff before.
	I'm disgusted with all these people, just like I'm disgusted with Biden and Trump and their so-called pandemic and their mass murder of people with the jabs.
	Don't get caught up into this Republican versus Democrat, Jew versus Palestinian stuff.
	These are not the issues that they're really concerned about.
	And you can discern this from looking at what they're doing and what they're not doing in any of this.
	The idea that a Jewish student, they say in LifeSite, that's a Christian who is there in Gaza, the idea that a Jewish student walking across Harvard Yard Has to be accosted by a mob because an American student who's Jewish gets accosted by a mob as he's walking across the college campus is absolutely shameful and it is despicable, he said. But at the same time, it is shameful and despicable that we are indifferent to the sufferings of the people of Gaza.
	And why, he says.
	Why are we indifferent?
	Is it because they're Arab?
	Is it because they're predominantly Muslim?
	What is it that has silenced us, he says.
	And so, that is a question.
	You know, everybody wants to appeal to the humanity, the compassionate people for their fellow man, in most cases, and yet, it's not about that at all.
	It's not about that at all.
	Mark Levin. We own this country, he says.
	And he thinks pro-Palestinian protesters should be rounded up and deported.
	Who's the we? Who's the we?
	Trump said the Jewish lobby owns Congress, and rightfully so, said Trump.
	So these are the people, Mark Levin, who he's spoken out against some of this college campus stuff, but not with the level of vitriol that he is now.
	So the people who were donating to these colleges, they were fine with all this destruction of our society, hatred of our people, until the Jacobin mob that they financed came for them.
	Isn't it always that way?
	Just like Robosphere. These people who fund and who lead this movement.
	And those are the people who were, you know, the donors who were giving money to Harvard and Columbia and everything.
	They were the ones who were pushing all this stuff.
	And eventually, the mob comes with its guillotines for them.
	Levin says, round them up.
	Deport those who are here on student visas.
	Arrest the others. Put out their names and photos so everyone knows who never to hire.
	Oh, well, I thought he didn't like cancel culture.
	Oh. Well, we are red-blooded Americans, and we own this country.
	They don't, he said.
	Well, he never called for this before.
	He never called for these people who hated America.
	He said it's not okay to be white.
	He never called for them to never be able to get a job or anything like that, or to be deported or jailed.
	And so... On Zero Hedge.
	There's an article there from somebody who goes by the name of Blue Apples.
	And his idea is that this is actually George Soros and some of these people actually using this in order to advance their agenda of eradicating free speech, controlling free speech.
	And they've been able to get, as I mentioned before, People like Trader Mike Johnson and Abbott who will join in with them.
	They were all about protecting free speech on campus until they didn't like the free speech on campus.
	You see, free speech is speech.
	If you don't support speech that you don't like, you don't support free speech, do you?
	I don't like what they're saying, but I will defend their right to say it.
	Because if we don't, we won't have any free speech either.
	And so, Blue Apples, as you know, George Soros, and as I pointed out in the last couple of days, yeah, he's, you know, we've got the receipts, how he's been contributing to these organizations that are basically running these Palestinian protests, and I also pointed out, which I haven't seen anybody else draw the connection to the district attorneys.
	For example, the University of Texas where Abbott wanted everybody arrested, just like Mark Levin.
	Well, they did. They arrested 57 people, and half of them had absolutely no connection to the university.
	All of them were let go without charges by the district attorney who...
	Was supported and given massive amounts of money by George Soros to get elected.
	And so, these are the goals of Soros, to eliminate free speech and the First Amendment.
	As this writer says, by provoking the reactionary response against these college protests, Soros has seemingly further fortified the pro-Israel lobby's position by manipulating America's right wing into aligning with it, and in doing so, exposing its hypocrisy over the issues of free speech and free assembly as a means of anti-establishment activism.
	We're seeing this hypocrisy all over the place.
	We had occasional cortex was going along.
	They had some of these Palestinian protesters come after her.
	And, you know, she basically said, well, you know, we like the protesters because they make people feel uncomfortable.
	Well, they made her feel uncomfortable.
	And she got real sassy with them, so to speak, and with her boyfriend.
	Get your hands off of me, type of thing, you know?
	Yeah. You know, it's difficult to accept the principle of free speech when people are saying stuff that you really hate, isn't it?
	And you want to just call what the speech that you hate, you want to call it hate speech and shut it down, don't you?
	And even more, you want to, just like Mark Levin says, you want to arrest those people.
	You want to punish them.
	It's not enough to silence them anymore.
	Now they've got to go to jail.
	And that's what DeSantis did in order to get money from Israeli backers.
	He signed a bill. Saying we're going to make a felony out of hate speech.
	Well, we either have the First Amendment or we have hate speech.
	You can't have both.
	If you have any hate speech laws, especially if you're going to put people in jail for that, then you don't have free speech.
	In response to college protests against Israel's war in Gaza, the mainstream right has become the embodiment of everything they stood against in 2020, embracing calls to deny protesters their First Amendment rights in support of the neocon Axis' self-proclaimed greatest ally, Israel. See, they want to destroy property.
	They want to obstruct others who are there on college campus.
	That's not free speech.
	You can punish that type of stuff, like I said before about the satanic temple.
	They don't believe that. They don't have religion.
	They don't have any beliefs. They're just trying to attack Christianity.
	These people, and I've seen these protesters before as well, what do they do?
	Do they ever want to debate you, right?
	You've seen over and over again.
	I've done it myself, but you've seen other reporters do it.
	Walk up to them, say, tell us, get out of here, you conservative racist.
	I don't want to talk to you. And now, you know, what are they?
	They're racist. But they don't want to debate.
	They just engage in name-calling and censorship.
	When Karen was protesting at an abortion clinic...
	She's standing there with a sign.
	Abortion is black genocide, right?
	And so Antifa shows up.
	First time we ever saw Antifa.
	They show up and there's a guy there and he comes up with a black sign.
	Doesn't say anything. He just wants to silence what you have to say.
	He doesn't want to debate.
	He doesn't want to engage in free speech.
	He wants to engage in censorship.
	And so he takes his black sign and he puts it in front of Karen's sign.
	She moves her sign down.
	He moves his sign down. She moves her sign up.
	And so they're going up and down.
	And up and down. They don't want to debate anything.
	They just want to label everybody as stuff.
	There is no debate going on here.
	So why would the GOP respond and say, we're going to shut down free speech?
	There is no speech going on.
	There is criminal activity that's going on.
	They're destroying property.
	They're obstructing and threatening other people, maybe attacking other people.
	I don't know. But they are intimidating, obstructing other people.
	They're destroying public property and private property.
	Isn't that enough? No, it's not enough.
	Because the agenda is not about the thing that you see.
	It's about something else.
	And it always is, isn't it?
	It's always about something else.
	So now the GOP is calling this stuff, calling for hate crime legislation, calling for censorship, calling for monitors.
	They'll always make two mistakes rather than admit to one.
	The original mistake is the college.
	Or sending your kids to the college.
	Or sending our money to the colleges.
	Stop sending our money. Look, if these people want to set up a Marxist seminator, I'm okay with that as long as they don't get government money.
	As long as they don't start destroying private property and that type of thing.
	They can be as hateful of white people or Jewish people, whatever they want to be.
	I just don't want to be forced to give them money.
	But instead, they're going to continue down this path.
	The political establishment behind the deep state, the permanent Washington, the globalism, whatever else you want to talk about, it takes to undermining the national sovereignty of the United States.
	And it has now regained control of the right.
	What used to be the parting on the left with the ADL and Southern Poverty Law Center, now we've got DeSantis, And Kristi Noem, anybody who wants to run for vice president or president, they got to appease the Jewish lobby.
	That's very politically powerful and financing.
	And so they have to say what they want.
	And what they want, to their shame, is to censor our speech.
	What is the matter with a country like Israel?
	That can't win an open, free society.
	They have to censor what we're doing.
	That puts them in the same box as pharmaceutical companies and the American Medical Association and the frauds who are running this climate change stuff, the UNIPCC. They're all the same.
	They're not going to let you talk or debate, amongst yourself even.
	Let alone debate them.
	We are above talking to you.
	And by the way, you can't talk to each other either.
	It's always the same, isn't it?
	And so they kind of show really what they're made of.
	Determining on whether or not they support free speech or not.
	It's the same thing we've seen over and over again.
	George Soros seems to have taken a page out of M.A. Rothschild's book by funding both sides of the Israel-Palestine conflict in order to execute a divide-and-conquer strategy.
	Well, that's also what our government does.
	We fund both sides as well, don't we?
	So this monitor bill, bipartisan bill, would create anti-Semitism monitors at college campuses.
	Think about this when they were doing anti-American stuff, right?
	They have somebody monitoring that?
	Well, no, we know what that is.
	We know that's being pushed out by the Biden administration, Homeland Security, all the rest of it.
	They're pushing out the critical race theory.
	They're pushing out that kind of stuff as well as the grooming of kids.
	So we don't have any anti-American monitors.
	Nobody's saying, hey, I saw a bunch of lies about the founding of America, the 1619 Project.
	You should take a look at that. This is what's happening at this college campus.
	No, we have to do that. And when we do that, they shut us down, don't they?
	Should have been shut down a long time ago.
	But they didn't care when it was anti-American.
	They only care when it is anti-Semitism.
	House Speaker, House Trader, Mike Johnson, has called on Biden to send in the National Guard.
	And so has Netanyahu.
	Though he's also telling us what to do.
	This leader of a foreign government, of course.
	And so they've come up, listen to this, they call it the Columbia Act.
	Don't you love it when they come up with these phony acronyms?
	Like the Patriot Act and stuff like that.
	Well, here's the Columbia Act.
	It stands for College Oversight and Legal Updates Mandating Bias Investigations and Accountability.
	That's why these congressional aides get the big bucks, isn't it?
	Yeah, come up with that kind of garbage.
	Empower the Federal Department of Education, which should not even exist, to impose a third-party anti-Semitism monitor on any college or university receiving federal funding.
	The monitor would be appointed by the Secretary of this Unconstitutional Department of Education.
	The terms and conditions of the monitorship would be set by this Secretary, and the expenses of the monitorship We'll be paid for by the particular college or university that has been selected for monitorship.
	So they will decide if you need to be monitored.
	And if you do, you'll have to hire a monitor to come there.
	And talk about it. But the only thing, they're not concerned about anti-Americanism, not concerned about racism, they're not concerned about, you know, the insanity that is being put through to come after the college kids or minors or anything.
	No. It's only going to be about anti-Semitism.
	That's the only thing they care about.
	Failure to comply with a monitorship would result in the loss of federal funds.
	Because always, folks, it's the fiat currency.
	That backs up the fiat orders.
	Just as we saw with Trump.
	Just as we saw with Biden.
	I'm going to cut off your money if you don't do this.
	Or here's some money. Do what I say.
	Bribery and blackmail using fiat currency are fascist government.
	And it's not just there, of course.
	It is also the border, which was, nothing was done about the border.
	Now, think about this for a moment.
	We've got war zone surveillance technology is now going to be put into some of these Texas border towns.
	Paid for by the federal government with a grant from Homeland Security.
	So they will pay for this kind of stuff, but they won't pay to secure the border.
	They'll pay to spy on Americans, but they won't secure the border.
	They will push IDs for Americans because we don't want to have somebody who's here illegally getting a job or voting or any of that kind of stuff.
	So you Americans need to get an ID. We're not going to do anything at the border for the people coming in.
	And so at the same time that trader Mike Johnson is authorizing and extending FISA, he didn't just reauthorize it.
	He made it far more extensive.
	At the same time that he's doing that, he's also doing nothing for the border.
	And now we have the federal government that's going to use the border issue.
	To do surveillance.
	To authorize surveillance.
	Big Brother isn't just watching you.
	He's using your cell phone, smartwatch, wireless earbuds, your car entertainment systems, and your license plates to track your location in real time.
	Geospatial intelligence has been the fastest growing part of the American intelligence community since the late 1990s.
	It's always about this.
	And even though this is a very extensive article from an organization called Not Us, just as you see, whether it's a left organization or a right organization, nobody will use the term geospatial intelligence.
	I find that fascinating.
	In the same way that nobody would ever talk about the NSA until Ed Snowden released those documents.
	A little bit before that, some people were talking about it somewhat.
	But it was just, the press would not use, because it's controlled.
	They would not talk about the NSA. People would say, no such agency, and smile.
	And that's as close as you would get to it.
	They won't talk about geospatial intelligence, even though they would typically have a convention with about 4,000 people showing up.
	And that's where James Clapper got all of his promotions and accolades and his political power.
	At least two Texas communities along the U.S.-Mexico border have purchased a product called Traffic Hedge, which collects the unique wireless and Bluetooth signals emitted by nearly all modern electronics to identify devices and to track their movements.
	And so that is your wireless earbuds, your car entertainment system, your cell phone, your smartwatch, all of that is being watched.
	Traffic Hatch is unique, says the company, for the following reasons.
	The ability to detect in-vehicle wireless signals and to merge such signals with vehicle license plates.
	This is just another one of these problem-solution things, right?
	Let's not do anything about the border, but because we've got that problem, I've got a solution here.
	Let's spy on Americans, just like we spy on terrorists abroad in foreign wars.
	Combining license plate information with data collected from wireless signals is the kind of surveillance that the US military and intelligence agencies have long used.
	And now they're going to do it here domestically.
	So we continue to fund, with unlimited amounts of money, wars in Ukraine and Israel and trying to fund a war against China.
	We do nothing for the border.
	We do put in $3.5 billion for people to be brought over from Gaza to live in America and be fed by Americans and so forth.
	But we'll use all of this to go to war with Americans and to treat us as the U.S. military treats foreign enemies abroad.
	To spy on us. Not to spy on us without warrants, but to extend this.
	This is why I call Mike Johnson Trader Johnson.
	He speaks for the military-industrial complex.
	He speaks not for us.
	He speaks for the people who are at war with us and call themselves the American government.
	That's who Mike Johnson is speaker for.
	Webb County, Texas, which includes Laredo.
	Received funding under Homeland Security Grant Program called Operation Stone Garden to purchase traffic hatch.
	Valverde County also is buying it, but they're doing it with a Texas state grant called Operation Lone Star.
	So, you know, Feds are giving money for people to buy it.
	The state government is giving money for people to buy it.
	Abbott. If I worked as a small county sheriff, I would have probably caught something like 200% more of our criminals with just two of these boxes, said Aaron Brown, a former CIA counter-surveillance and digital tracking expert.
	Well, if only we had the CIA here.
	We could just end all crime in America.
	Except for the fact that they're running the drug war.
	Always have been.
	One of the biggest sources of crime in our country.
	I wonder if he had, if I was a county sheriff, what would happen if I traced this stuff back to the CIA? What would happen to me as a county sheriff?
	Well, you know what would happen. So, anyway, Brown says he's built his own version of Traffic Catch from off-the-shelf components.
	He drives around the Washington area with it to see what interesting information he can capture.
	He's not interested in bad people, as Michael Hayden said.
	He's interested in interesting people.
	Collecting radio emissions called signals intelligence, or they just call it SIGINT, was once the purview of specialized classified military units or intelligence agencies.
	But with so much modern technology, emitting information that can be collected by anyone with an antenna, the practice is becoming more widespread by both commercial and government entities.
	Use the name.
	It's Geospatial Intelligence.
	We'll be back. Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
	From country to blues, classic hits to news, APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
	Get details at APSradio.com.
	♪♪♪
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	Night Show.
	you Welcome back. Brian and Deb McCartney, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that. This is the day the Lord has made.
	We will rejoice and be glad in it.
	Psalm 118. Yes, we used to have a song that we used to sing about 30 years ago that pretty much had that verbatim.
	On Rumble, Radice Bro, thank you for the tip.
	The other part of a verify people ignore...
	The Fed already makes people take an Israel loyalty oath to get contracts.
	Same thing will be for anyone looking for a job in the future.
	Rumble, no DAC88, you look like Robert E. Lee.
	Well, thank you. Take that as a compliment.
	I mean, let me get that pose that he had in the doorway there where he's scowling at the people taking his photograph.
	I saw a thing that was served to me on YouTube.
	I look for music and stuff.
	And so there was this thing.
	This guy was surrounded with keyboards.
	In a U-shape. And he had them stacked high and stuff.
	And, you know, that got my attention because they were old, classic keyboards.
	They were synthesizers that had, you know, loaded up with patch cords and stuff like that.
	And he had a Mellotron.
	So I was like, oh, let me hear this. And he was doing something that Genesis had done.
	And he had a Mini Moog on top of the Mellotron.
	He had a Hammond organ behind him.
	You know, all the usual stuff from back in the 70s.
	And so I clicked on it, and it's like, eh, the music was kind of meh.
	But the guy had a long white beard, and he was bald at the top, and then his hair was kind of bushy on the sides and everything.
	I looked at him, and I thought, he really looks like Santa Claus.
	So I thought, let me see what anybody says.
	Second comment down.
	And somebody said, I knew that Santa kept all the best toys for himself.
	That was a great comment.
	So, yeah, who knows?
	We can't control really what we look like, but we just have to go with it.
	Let's talk a little bit about the Palestinian squatters.
	People are going to be brought in to the United States.
	The White House, surprise, surprise, is considering welcoming some Palestinians from war-torn Gaza as refugees.
	Who would have thought it?
	You know, three and a half billion dollars in there for that very purpose, apparently.
	You know, it was in the discovered, like I said, we didn't see it for about a week, almost a week.
	Before that came out, we're so focused on the other betrayals of traitor Mike Johnson.
	Oh, Democrats love him.
	They've already announced that they're going to stand with him to shut down any Republican efforts to get rid of him.
	It's the best deal they've ever had.
	Anyway, it's great to have controlled opposition, isn't it?
	Here's a guy, you know, from everything he appears to be, this conservative, Christian, Republican, everything, and yet...
	He's a hardcore lefty.
	He's marching in lockstep with the Biden administration, Chuck Schumer and all the rest of these people.
	The Biden administration is considering bringing Palestinians to the U.S. as refugees, offering a permanent safe haven to some of those fleeing from war-torn Gaza.
	This is the same administration, by the way, that just after 10 years of living here, a German Christian family Who have a lot of kids and they were going to have their kids taken away from them in Germany because they wanted to homeschool because they're Christians.
	And so they left and they got refugee status and that was through a couple of different administrations and yet Biden decided that they needed to be deported.
	And it was only when there was a big, massive outcry that they backed off of that.
	But anyway, I guess, you know, we're kind of the garbage dump of the world here, the way they want to treat us.
	We have sent billions annually to Israel.
	And what do they do? They send us their problems.
	So we have a government that goes abroad.
	It creates coups, starts wars, gets involved on both sides of every conflict, gets everybody mad at us, and then we bring those people here.
	Why? Well, because they want chaos and civil war.
	They want to have people that are going to hate America, don't like this country at all, when everything starts going down.
	That's what this is all about.
	These people who protect us.
	The CIA, you know, that protects us from those terrible terrorists like Tim Osman?
	That's what they called Osama bin Laden when he used to come visit them all the time in the Pentagon.
	And at Langley, he was Tim Osman.
	Then he became Osama bin Laden.
	Top U.S. officials have also discussed getting additional Palestinians out of Gaza and processing them as refugees.
	Many of us believe that was always the purpose of the Gaza Pier that they're setting up there.
	Supposedly, it was going to be there to bring food to the people in Gaza, but whether it's going to be bringing food to them or whether it's going to be used to bring them to us, and while this is happening, Hamas is shelling it, apparently.
	I mean, this is the insanity of this.
	While the eligible population is expected to be relatively small, says CBS News.
	Do you believe that? Do you believe it's just going to be a small number of people?
	If it's going to be a small number of people, why do you have three and a half billion dollars there?
	The proposals to resettle certain Palestinians as refugees would mark a shift in long-standing U.S. government policy and practice since its inception in 1980.
	The U.S. refugee program has not resettled Palestinians in large numbers.
	Over the past decade, the U.S. has resettled more than 400,000 refugees fleeing violence and war across the globe.
	Fewer than 600 were Palestinian.
	Yeah, about one out of a thousand, I guess.
	Democrats would likely support the move, of course.
	They want more voters.
	They want more Congress people like Ilhan Omar.
	That's what we'll get out of this.
	They'll have two or three congressional seats with all the people they could bring in from Gaza.
	You know, there's millions of people there.
	So this is another way to accelerate the Cloward and Piven stuff, isn't it?
	To qualify to enter the U.S. as a refugee, applicants have to prove their fleeing persecution based on certain factors, such as their nationality, their religion, or their political views.
	But, of course, the Biden administration, as I said before, didn't care about that when you got white German Christian homeschoolers.
	No, no, no. You don't get any refugee status.
	And they would be attacked at Columbia as well.
	Anyway, yeah, the Democrats are going to favor this.
	As a matter of fact, Jamal Bowman just couldn't contain himself.
	The guy who pulled the fire alarm, right, to shut down debate.
	That guy, Jamal Bowman, and got away with it.
	He says he is fully, quote, fully in favor of resettling Gaza migrants in the United States.
	Of course he would be. Should the United States bring in people from Gaza?
	He said, we are a land of migrants and we are a land of asylum seekers.
	He said, the U.S. has always been an open home to those people.
	Well, I have no problem with that.
	I do have a problem with the welfare state.
	This is a problem I had with the Libertarian Party, as I said before.
	I would always oppose them.
	There would always be open borders.
	I would always say no. Not until you stop the welfare state.
	We didn't need three and a half billion dollars to bring in people through Ellis Island.
	They came in with nothing except the clothes on their back and desire to be free.
	Those huddled masses yearning to be free, they're now huddled masses yearning for free stuff.
	Big difference. Makes all the difference in the world.
	People who want to come here for the freedom then like this country.
	People want to come here for the free stuff.
	Guess what? There's never going to be enough.
	They're going to look for free stuff from you too.
	Because they're squatters.
	So, you know, we're all about being an open home to those people.
	Unless they're white German Christians fleeing religious persecution.
	Which case we want to send them back.
	Three and a half billion dollars to supercharge mass migration from the Middle East.
	That's not what I say.
	That's what Senator Eric Schmidt said.
	He said, not only did the foreign aid package, quote-unquote, foreign aid, foreign war, do nothing to secure our own border, but it included $3.5 billion to supercharge mass migration.
	The $3.5 billion was granted to the Department of State.
	They're also using the refugee funds to expand migration routes from many African and Muslim countries.
	In March, they pulled in 12,000 people from the Congo, plus 16,732 migrants from the Muslim countries of Afghanistan, where they love us.
	Don't they love us in Afghanistan?
	They love us in Syria, too, and in Pakistan and Iraq.
	You see what this government of traitors like Mike Johnson is doing.
	Not a dime to protect our borders, but bring in the barbarians that they've been bombing and killing for decades who absolutely hate America.
	They hate America as much as those radicals on Columbia, the Colombian campus.
	They hate Americans.
	Let's bring them in, as many as we...
	$3.5 billion worth of them.
	Let's bring them in. They hate America.
	They'll be very useful.
	In this civil war, they're trying to engineer.
	Tucked into the folds of this aid package is $3.5 billion for mass immigration NGOs, non-governmental organizations.
	Filter that money through the UN to the NGOs or give it directly to the NGOs.
	Trader Johnson.
	What a traitor he is.
	So, the cost has not just risen, it has exploded.
	This is a Reuters report.
	It says the pier that they're building there in Gaza will cost U.S. taxpayers at least $320 million to finish.
	This is double the early estimates which were floated earlier this year.
	The figure, which has not been previously reported, illustrates the massive scale of a construction effort that the Pentagon has said involves about 1,000 U.S. service members, mostly from the Army and Navy.
	The cost has not just risen, it has exploded, said Senator Roger Wicker, top Republican on the Democrat-led Senate Armed Services Committee.
	This dangerous effort, with marginal benefit, will now cost the American taxpayers at least $320 million to operate the pier for only 90 days.
	Many government officials, especially from the global South countries, have highlighted Washington's contradictory approach to Gaza.
	On the one hand, the U.S. has been funding the Israeli military machine, sending controversial weaponry like 2,000-pound bombs, while on the other hand, Biden has condemned the soaring civilian death toll.
	Who would have thought they would kill civilians if we dropped massive numbers of 2,000-pound bombs?
	Ironically, to some degree, the United States is funding both sides of the conflict.
	It's not just Soros. It's not just the Rothschilds.
	That's the way the CIA does it.
	That's the way the Pentagon does it, as always.
	They want eternal war, and they want eternal chaos.
	That's how they keep control.
	They're absolutely satanic.
	It truly is amazing.
	So the Secretary of Defense It was questioned by Matt Gaetz.
	Matt Gaetz says, don't you think that putting this pier there counts as boots on the ground?
	And so he had Lloyd Austin insisted yesterday under questioning that stationing troops off of this pier leading to Gaza does not count as having boots on the ground.
	Well, it's boots on the water, I guess that's it, right?
	Play with the semantics there.
	While leaving wide open the possibility of a live fire exchange with attackers on the ground.
	So Matt Gaetz said boots on a pier, connected to the ground, connected to service members, shooting into Gaza doesn't count as boots on the ground?
	And Lloyd Austin with a straight face?
	It does not.
	It does not. It's like James Clapper.
	Are you spying on, asked by Ron Wyden, are you spying on the American people in that search warrant?
	No, no, Senator.
	Not on purpose.
	Yeah, right. At least a thousand U.S. service members.
	Now think about this. We had the Marines bombed in Beirut when Reagan was president.
	How many were killed?
	About 200, right?
	We got a thousand people here now.
	Reagan had the good sense that these people have always been fighting each other.
	They're going to continue to fight each other.
	We don't need to get in the middle of this.
	For whatever reason, I mean, he may have had some alternative motives.
	He was being run by Bill Casey, who was a piece of work himself.
	Anyway, at least 1,000 U.S. service members would be building this artificial floating pier and port.
	That is supposed to support humanitarian aid deliveries to civilians in Gaza, but it may be the way they're going to bring people out of there to the United States.
	Pentagon says it's coordinating with Israel's military to ensure protection of U.S. troops and to anchor the pier to shore without violating Biden's promise to have no American boots on the ground.
	See? There you go.
	Now, we will have Israeli soldiers standing there on the ground.
	And then, you know, we'll give them the ropes or chains or whatever to pull in this floating pier.
	And we won't be touching the ground.
	Yeah. Unidentified terrorist groups lobbed mortar rounds at efforts on the location laying the groundwork for the pier, while UN officials were touring the area on Wednesday, reported the Wall Street Journal.
	So Gates pressed Austin.
	He said, so shots from Gaza on our service members, and then in response, our armed service members shooting live fire into Gaza?
	That's a possible outcome here.
	So that we can become the port authority and run this pier?
	Is that right? What's this about?
	The Simpsons here.
	They're having a conflict, and Bart basically tells her, I'm just going to start walking this way, swinging my arms, and if you don't get out of my way, you getting hit is your own fault.
	Yeah, that's right. That's the way we conduct our foreign policy, right there in a nutshell, isn't it?
	He says, so Austin says, well, that's correct.
	I expect that we always will have, and then Gates cuts him off.
	He says, don't you think that counts as boots on the ground?
	Austin, no, no.
	Gates then accused the administration of misleading the American public.
	The Pentagon made an artificial distinction between placing American troops on Gazan soil and putting them in harm's way, or increasing the likelihood of active conflict involving the U.S. military as a result of the administration's Gaza policy, he said. Gates said, I think you're going to find the American people have a different perspective on that.
	Well, that remains to be seen.
	I mean, we seem to be giving them anything and everything they want, don't we?
	We'll be right back. Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing.
	Check out the jazz channel at APS radio.com and the APS radio app and leave the stress behind .
	. .
	.
	Well, on Rockman, thank you, Syrian girl, for the tip.
	She says, thank you, David, for your balanced presentation on the issue of importing millions of radicalized Palestinians into our already disintegrating nation.
	That's by design, isn't it?
	Well, let's move on to the attacks on our food supply.
	By our own government.
	The U.S. is now going to test ground beef.
	Deja vu all over again, isn't it?
	First they did it to the milk.
	Now they want to do it to the meat.
	It's almost as if somebody had a program where they didn't want us to have meat and dairy.
	Oh, that's right. Bloomberg and Sadiq Khan and the C40 initiative of 40 big cities now, about 100 cities, who specifically said, we don't want you to have any meat or dairy.
	This is amazing. You see, the federal government is desperate to do this.
	And there's also, I think, something of a turf war going on with the USDA. They're working very hard to maintain their centralized control of meat processing.
	And, you know, there's this back and forth.
	You've got the FDA and you have the USDA. The USDA is there to control meat.
	And the FDA's got pretty much everything else.
	In terms of food supply.
	So I think there's something of a turf war over the cows.
	So the USDA said that they're collecting now samples of ground beef.
	Why? Why? Well, as I said, we know it's because they want to shut down meat and dairy.
	But when you look at what they're telling people, if you're saying, well, we went out and we tested the milk.
	And yeah, we found some viral particles there, but you can't get sick from this stuff.
	So why would you continue to do this in the meat?
	What they said was, well, we've got these viral particles, and because you cook it with pasteurization, you're not going to get sick from this stuff.
	Well, I don't know how many people are out there eating raw hamburger meat.
	I don't think too many. This should not be an issue for them to be concerned about, except that they have this other agenda that is out there, which nobody wants to talk about.
	It's amazing. We all know that's what it is.
	I read for you some of the 500-plus comments on this Epoch Times story that Zero Hedge put there, and they said, are you kidding?
	This clickbait stuff? And that was about the milk.
	So this is ridiculous. They all knew, every single one of them.
	I just went page after page after page.
	Very funny, mocking them.
	And they all knew what this was about.
	You know what it's about. I know what it's about.
	The public knows what it's about.
	That's why they've got to keep their foot on our throat, constantly stopping us in the face of the censorship stuff.
	And that's why we should see the agenda that is being pushed forward with this campus wars.
	It's all about the free speech, folks.
	Anything that they can come up with.
	Anything and everything they can come up with.
	To shut down our free speech.
	So, federal officials are seeking to verify the safety of milk and meat now.
	Let me tell you, the FDA, the USDA, they're the threat to our food, not bird flu.
	The EPA is the threat to our energy and to our well-being, not CO2. It's these agencies.
	The USDA, the FDA, the EPA, they are the threat.
	And so this article from Reuters talks about the PCR tests.
	And listen to the way they do this.
	So it was the FDA that did the milk.
	Now the USDA is doing the meat.
	They said the FDA said on Friday that preliminary results of, listen to this, gold standard PCR tests.
	It's not a gold standard at all.
	It's a lying standard that was established by Fauci.
	It's a misuse of Carey Mullis' PCR test.
	If they could find this virus in you at all, and with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.
	It starts making you believe in the sort of Buddhist notion that everything is contained in everything else, right?
	I mean, because if you can amplify one single molecule up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do, Then there's just very few molecules that you don't have at least one single one of them in your body, okay?
	So that could be thought of as a misuse of it just to claim that it's meaningful.
	It allows you to take a very minuscule amount of anything and make it measurable and then talk about it in meetings and stuff like it is important.
	It doesn't tell you that you're sick and it doesn't tell you that the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you.
	Yeah, exactly right.
	And so we have this interesting situation now where Reuters is saying, the gold standard PCR test, fool's gold, showed pasteurization killed the bird flu virus in milk.
	And they also mentioned the fact that the CDC, the WHO, the FDA with their PCR test, they all say this doesn't present any problem to the food source.
	So why is the USDA then jumping into this?
	Well, again, they've got a different agenda.
	They're going to continue to try to use this stuff.
	So the USDA, the Department of Agriculture, is now going around looking at ground beef samples with PCR tests that indicate, quote, whether any viral particles are present, says Reuters.
	So what if they are?
	So what? You can magnify anything.
	You know, a trillion times you can find anything.
	USDA's additional testing is appropriate to ensure public health is protected and to stop the spread of animal disease.
	Who's saying that?
	A spokesperson for the Meat Institute.
	What is the Meat Institute?
	This is a trade group of people who want to have central monopolistic control of meat processing.
	They partner with the USDA, just like the pharmaceutical companies partner with the FDA. You've got the Meat Institute, a trade organization, of these two big-to-fail central control of our meat processing.
	So they're sucking up to the USDA, and it's part of why the USDA is doing this.
	They've been called under, you know, question, as I mentioned yesterday, the Beef Act, the Prime Act that Thomas Massey has put out to say, hey, if you're raising the cattle yourself and, you know, have a situation like Amos Miller, the Amish guy who's not selling this on the open market, this is something that people have bought into private ownership of this.
	You know, you own this. It's on your private property.
	You should be able to grow it and to process it yourself.
	No, no, no. Can't do that.
	That's a crime. It's a crime because the Meat Institute wants the monopolistic control that the USDA is going to make these arguments for them to have.
	USDA on Monday began requiring lactating dairy cows to test negative for bird flu before being moved across state lines as officials seek to contain the virus.
	This is the danger of the bureaucracy.
	This is the danger of regulation without representation.
	There should be debate on something like this.
	It should be there by our elected representatives if you have something like this.
	It should be debated.
	It should be challenged in court if they do something unconstitutional like this.
	So here's another example of the abuse of Of the Commerce Act in the Constitution.
	The Commerce Act is something that they've used to say, well, we don't need to have an amendment to the Constitution to prohibit alcohol.
	We're just going to use the Commerce Clause.
	Well, the Commerce Clause was there when everybody felt that it was necessary to have the 18th Amendment to prohibit alcohol.
	So that's a specious argument in the first place.
	But... The Commerce Clause is also superseded by the Tenth Amendment, which says if you aren't explicitly given these powers, those powers remain that of the state and of the people.
	So that made it clear.
	That's one of the reasons why everybody agreed that they needed to have an amendment to prohibit alcohol.
	But now they prohibit anything and everything they want with the Commerce Clause.
	The entire drug war is resting on that legal argument that is false.
	And so you see that the Commerce Clause, which was originally there to keep one state from essentially doing a trade war on somebody else.
	No, we're not going to take anything from this neighboring state.
	We don't like them. It was there to create open and free trade, and yet it is now used for exactly the opposite purpose all the time by the federal government.
	We're going to restrict and prohibit things.
	We're going to restrict trade here. They're restricting the movement of cattle if they haven't tested negative with a PCR test that has been blown up to absurd heights.
	So if this was going to happen, This should be a law passed by our elected representatives, challenged in court, instead because we have a regulatory state that is out of control, and the president likes it that way, the Congress likes it that way, the court system, the judiciary system likes it that way, the Supreme Court likes it that way.
	They all like it that way.
	They want them to be in control.
	Because the government can move very quickly, and because they don't have any accountability for what the federal government is doing.
	It's not my fault the regulatory agency did that.
	I don't have any control over them.
	Well, if you're not going to get control of them, why am I even bothering with federal elections?
	Which is why I don't bother with federal elections, except to explain to people why they need to understand where the threats are coming from.
	The nature of the threats and how you need to start pushing back against them, preparing for yourself, your family, working at the community level, perhaps maybe the state, but especially the community level.
	And so the USDA began requiring lactating cows to test negative before they could be moved across state lines.
	Do anything they want.
	CDC can come in and say, well, I know you've got a contract about rental stuff.
	And we told everybody, you can't go to work.
	We're going to take your business down.
	So if people can't pay for their...
	For their rent, for their mortgage, you can't evict them.
	You can't foreclose on them.
	Aren't we good guys now?
	We're the ones who shut down your business, but don't worry.
	For a temporary amount of time, we're going to keep you there, which just basically extends the misery, right?
	Extends the bankruptcy to landlords, who private landlords own 45% of the property, at least they used to before Trump.
	And the deep state did their thing.
	The Department of Agriculture said this weekend that testing is not required for cows that are shipped over state lines directly to slaughter facilities.
	Those cattle only need documentation showing that they were inspected by a veterinarian.
	Now, soon that will be injected by a veterinarian.
	And this is why they are going around testing ground beef.
	If they can find any harmless particles through magnification of any viral particles that they're looking for, you better believe that they're going to require it for shipping them across state lines to be used as meat.
	Because that's what this is about.
	It's an attack on meat and milk.
	This is a move by the USDA to make sure that every cow, every chicken and so forth is going to have an RFID tag on it and is going to have to have a vaccination record so they get that stuff into you through the food supply.
	And they're going to make sure that nobody processes any of these animals unless they are vaccinated.
	And they're going to have complete control of our food supply.
	That's what this is about.
	The USDA is now saying any positive PCR tests for retail or slaughter samples will be evaluated for a live virus.
	What does that even mean?
	And I had a listener, Roy, who sent this to me.
	I mentioned, I said, so, are viruses live?
	Are they dead? I mean, do they even exist?
	You know, that's the other part of it. Is there such a thing as a virus?
	Is it just an intellectual construct that we use to try to describe what we see happening with disease?
	Or is it something that's really there?
	If it is there, is it alive or is it dead?
	There's an ongoing debate about whether viruses should be considered truly alive or not.
	Viruses lack many of the key characteristics typically associated with life, such as the ability to reproduce independently.
	Or to carry out metabolism on their own.
	However, they do possess genetic material, DNA or RNA, and they can replicate and they can evolve by taking over the cellular machinery of a host organism.
	By the way, you know, when you define it that way, the genetic code injections, the mRNA injections, were viruses themselves, weren't they?
	They reproduced. That was the way it was described.
	Moderna said to Trump, well, we can do it right away because we don't have to manufacture this stuff.
	What we do is we give it to you and your body will manufacture it, right?
	Your body will manufacture it because they're going to hijack the cellular machinery.
	They're going to reprogram you.
	The genetic code injections will...
	So from that kind of a definition, they're injecting you, they say.
	This is the way Moderna described it.
	They're injecting you with a virus.
	Most scientists do not consider viruses to be alive in the traditional sense because they're completely inert and acellular.
	They don't have cells. Outside of a host organism, viruses are essentially just strands of genetic code.
	Enclosed in a protein coat.
	So just as, okay, they put it in a protein coat.
	So we had strands of genetic code.
	They were encapsulated in polyethylene glycol.
	They were pegylated. So again, the virus was a vaccine.
	Well, the vaccine was a virus.
	Either way, right? It was, I said, the bioweapon is the vaccine.
	The virus is the vaccine.
	It's a genetic code wrapped in a coating.
	Anyway, they cannot independently reproduce, metabolize, grow, or respond to environmental stimuli on their own.
	When a virus or an mRNA vaccine It enters a suitable host cell, however.
	It takes over the cell's machinery to produce more viral particles, at which point it could be argued that the virus transitions into a living state by being able to metabolize and replicate using the host's resources.
	Ultimately, whether viruses are classified as living or not is somewhat semantic.
	They possess some lifelike characteristics, but they lack many fundamental traits that we associate with cellular life.
	Many experts view them as existing in a gray area between living and non-living, or as highly complex molecular machines lying at the edge of what we consider life to be.
	Complex molecular machines.
	We don't believe in God, right?
	DNA code. Replicating, error correcting, all this other kind of stuff, but we don't believe in God.
	Even though it took people decades to try to break that code.
	We don't believe that. Yeah, we'll listen for repeating signals from space.
	The search for extraterrestrial intelligence.
	But we'll deny that DNA comes from information, comes from an intelligence.
	Anyway, the debate continues, but most agree viruses blur the line between living and non-living things.
	Thank you, Roy. That's very good.
	Yeah, you know, the debate also continues as to whether or not they exist or whether or not that is simply an abstraction to try to explain a way, to try to explain diseases.
	Either way, we know that this PCR test is absolutely bunk.
	The guy who designed it said so.
	And if we blow up something by a trillion times, again, in the past I've used the analogy of taking a telescope, looking at the telescope and thinking that the moon's about to hit the earth because it looks so big.
	I mean, it's just ridiculous what they're doing with the PCR stuff.
	So, last week, the USDA said that it had found bird flu and lung tissue sample from an asymptomatic dairy cow.
	The dairy cow wasn't sick.
	Oh, but we're not going to let people have this, they said.
	It was sent to the slaughter from an infected herd.
	The animal did not enter the food supply, according to the department.
	Now, think about this. Why were they looking for lung tissue samples from this cow?
	Well, it was an infected herd that was sent to them.
	So they chop up all the cows in the herd.
	And in one cow, in one lung sample, they use the PCR test, magnify it by a trillion times or whatever the number of cycles are.
	And they find some of this virus, they said, in the lung tissue.
	The cow wasn't sick.
	Do you understand how insane this is?
	And quite frankly, it is no less insane than the nonsense that they're doing about CO2. CO2 is also based on absolute total junk science, absurdity, irrational thinking, uncritical thinking, and it is accepted uncritically by the public because it's pushed to them by the press.
	In another safety study, USDA will cook ground beef containing a virus surrogate.
	A virus surrogate.
	At different temperatures to assess how it inactivates the virus.
	The USDA sees this bird flu viral stuff as their ticket for control.
	They're on this.
	To an amazing extent.
	They said cooking meat to a safe internal temperature kills bacteria and viruses.
	So, what is all this about going around with the PCR test?
	Again, it is so they can track and trace everything.
	So they can say, you've got to vaccinate your food.
	Columbia, not university but the country, rejected the import of beef and beef products coming from the United States.
	This is the outside globalist pressure.
	But as they say, even Reuters says, there are no known cases of bird flu and beef cattle so far.
	No cows died except for the ones that they kill.
	Just like the chickens.
	No, they're not sick, but we tested them with a PCR test, so we're going to have to kill a million of your chickens here.
	Or many more.
	The human case in the current outbreak was a Texas farm worker who suffered conjunctivitis following exposure to dairy cows.
	Is this a characteristic of flu, conjunctivitis, pink eye?
	Yeah, I didn't realize just how close I came to dying when I was a child.
	I had pink eye in first grade because we've got gnats in our eyes.
	They didn't have air conditioning in Florida.
	You can imagine how miserable that was when I went to elementary school.
	So yeah, I had pink eye a couple of times because they'd leave the windows open because it's so hot.
	And as a little kid, you would rub the gnats into your eyes or something.
	Anyway, conjunctivitis.
	I guess I nearly died.
	I had measles, chicken pox, all those things.
	How did I survive?
	I don't know. So, are they even sure that the conjunctivitis is from this?
	And if you got one guy who claims that he got conjunctivitis from this stuff, whether he did or not, so what?
	It's not serious.
	But you're going to kill millions of chickens?
	And you're going to exercise all this control over tracking and tracing cattle everywhere, vaccinating all the cattle.
	By the way, when we talk about mandatory vaccines in Australia, Perth, there's a police officer who refused the vaccine mandate.
	He took it all the way to their Supreme Court, and unfortunately, he lost.
	He lost. As a matter of fact, two of them.
	A... West Australian police officer Ben Falconer and police staff member Les Finley, both unvaccinated, sought to challenge whether the police commissioner had the authority to infringe on employees' bodily integrity by ordering them to be vaccinated against COVID as a condition of employment.
	So the Supreme Court determined that the vaccine mandate was justified due to the extraordinary emergency.
	Well, so there we go.
	If somebody declares an emergency, whether anybody's died or gotten sick or not, then that's it.
	There is no protection of individual rights.
	There's no rule of law. It's all swept away.
	Constitution suspended. We always said it was going to come through FEMA, didn't we?
	Well, it did. Except, you know, just take the vaccine.
	It's nothing but sugar water, said Alex when push came to shove, right?
	The purpose of the litigation was to discover what rights we have over our bodies in the workplace.
	And the judiciary and the government have given their perspective on that today, said one of the police officers.
	In other words, we have no rights.
	We have no rights.
	For me, I'm going to be torn to pieces by my employer, and I'll be sacrificing my career.
	I welcome that.
	It's a necessary good.
	I want people to carefully observe what happens now and what happens to my colleagues, he said.
	So the Biden administration is being criticized by Breitbart.
	Because they are allowing a PPE factory, you know, protective personal equipment.
	The kind of stuff that, remember, Trump used the emergency defense thing.
	They were going to commandeer industries and we're going to, you know, create factories and all this other kind of stuff.
	Run it through the Department of Defense.
	They did that to create ventilators.
	Well, they also did it... To create a factory to manufacture things like rubber gloves and masks and things like that.
	Well, here's a rubber glove factory.
	And Breitbart is very, very concerned about the fact that Joe Biden is going to let yet another factory languish that was meant to provide Americans with critical medical supplies.
	Breitbart, it wasn't a pandemic.
	Stop pushing the fear four years later.
	Pushing fear of China.
	Pushing fear of pandemics.
	I am sick of the conservative press doing this as well.
	They know better. They want to push fear.
	They want to push a China war.
	Said, well, he's going to cut down this thing that has critical medical supplies in case we've got yet another one of these horrible pandemics.
	People from Breitbart, Nolte, John Nolte, and others are just panicking about this stuff all through the pandemic.
	People aren't wearing their masks.
	People aren't getting their vaccine. Now, Biden is shutting down a PPE factory.
	So, you know, here's the news by Bart, in case you haven't gotten the news.
	Do you realize that it's not just rubber gloves and masks that we're going to be buying from China?
	We're going to be buying all the EVs from China.
	We're going to be buying everything that is manufactured because they're shutting down our energy supplies here in the United States while they're building them without any restrictions in China and India.
	The Paris Climate Accord that Trump left in place.
	Did nothing to shut it down.
	That Mitch McConnell, and not a single senator, not Rand Paul, not Mike Lee, nobody did anything to shut down and to call the bluff of the Paris Climate Treaty.
	Nobody did anything to call that bluff.
	And so as a result, everything's going to be made in China.
	Steel, rubber gloves, cars, EVs, all this stuff, because we won't be able to compete with them.
	When they have cheap, readily available power.
	And we've got the gremlins in this country shutting everything down.
	I'm going to talk about the power play coming up here.
	That old Larry Fink of BlackRock It's getting involved in.
	Oh, he's rubbing his hands with glee at the World Economic Forum telling everybody, hey, everybody's going to be short of power.
	We can get into this thing right now.
	We can get in on the ground floor. Destroy the existing power grid.
	Get in on the ground floor.
	And not only will we have a monopoly on the power, but it'll be so scarce we can charge them whatever we want.
	Oh, yeah. It's such a crime, and they're getting away with it.
	It is absolutely insane.
	And on Rumbles, Brumford says, Tony Fauci does not mind going right up in front of the people who pay a salary and lie directly into the camera.
	And that's a quote from Carey Mullis.
	That's right. Yes.
	By the way, Travis is reminding me to remind you that you can find the Roku channel.
	If you search for The David Knight Show on the Roku app, or if you search The David Knight Show Roku in your search engine, it should be able to take you there.
	And if you have Roku and you watch it there, please remember to give us a five-star rating, thumbs up, whatever it is.
	Like the show. If you like the show, please do.
	It helps us to get visibility there.
	And wherever you're watching it, Please like the stream.
	We fight upstream all the time to get people to find us.
	It has been a constant struggle of being silenced and pushed off the internet.
	So it is a big help to us.
	It doesn't cost you anything except just a little bit of time.
	So if you would do that, that would be a big help for the show.
	During the pandemic...
	And this is the way they put it, the federal government.
	No, during the pandemic, it was the Trump administration that granted $123 million to this company, Bluestar, for the plant and for an adjacent glove-making factory.
	But with inflation, the cost of energy and building materials going up, the CEO said that he needs $60 million more to hook it up to utilities and $170 million more to build the glove factory.
	This is the length with which Breitbart will go to criticize Biden.
	They will pretend that there was a pandemic.
	They'll pretend that this kind of government subsidy and crony capitalism and misallocation of resources is a good thing if it's done by Trump, and it's a bad thing if it's shut down by Biden for whatever reason.
	This is crazy.
	Does anybody at Breitbart really understand what's going on?
	They've become such absurd partisan hacks.
	They're like CNN, except on the other side.
	It's amazing. He said he never got the additional $60 million and the additional $170 million after the first $123 million.
	He said the Biden Department of Defense told him the contract was over.
	That's something he did with Trump, so we're going to shut this down because, you know, Trump versus us.
	But think about that, coming from the Department of Defense.
	And yes, we know the pandemic was about the military doing this stuff.
	It was medical martial law.
	The military was very much involved in all of Operation Warp Speed, running it, delivering the stuff, and all the rest of the stuff.
	But it really was about Trump using this defense appropriation stuff.
	That's why it was running through the Department of Defense, because he was doing it not just for the rubber gloves, But even more to his shame, he was doing it for the ventilators that killed people.
	That's why I say when I look at Peter Navarro, yeah, it is absolutely political persecution.
	But if anybody deserves it, he does.
	Because he killed a lot of people with those ventilators.
	And he still is saying that it was a good thing.
	If we don't call out people like that, they're going to keep killing people, like I said before.
	It's like having a shooter on top of the building.
	And you don't want to warn people.
	Oh, well, yeah, but, you know, he's killing people.
	He's up there, but he's part of the club that I was in.
	You know, I was in this club, Young Republicans or something, and this guy is shooting people off the rooftop, and he's got a MAGA cap, so I don't want to draw anybody's attention to the fact that he's killing people up there.
	Yeah, let's not talk about that.
	The WHO amendments revisited.
	This is from Brownstone, and they're talking about the IHR... These other things that are coming out of the pandemic treaty that are coming out of the WHO, the World Health Organization.
	But I think that we really need to do something.
	Jay and Jessica, as I said, sent this thing saying, let's get letter-writing programs and try to get people on our side at the state level to start pushing back against some of this Model State Emergency Health Powers Act that was put out.
	And that really is true.
	I mean, we could cut the legs off of this stuff at the state level If we removed some of the authority that the state governments gave themselves after model legislation was sent out to them in December of 2001.
	So we need to think about what we can do with this.
	I'm thinking I ought to set something up and show people what the Model State Health Emergency Powers Act is and the background of this.
	So it would help people, I think, to understand the germ games, the long-term plan of this stuff, but also, more importantly, to see a way that we can fight back against the World Health Organization, against the pandemic treaty, against these new regulations, and do it at the local level.
	That's where this stuff has to roll out.
	If we put some legal restrictions on these public health departments, local and state, that were given these extra powers based on 9-11, based on the anthrax false flag attack, based on Dark Winter back in 2001, they sent out this model legislation.
	We need to repeal that stuff at the state level.
	So we need to start contacting some people about this stuff.
	Everywhere. And maybe we can put something together that people can use.
	So thank you, Jay and Jessica, for that idea.
	It's worth remembering that the pandemic was synonymous with influenza for the longest time.
	When you go back and you look at the WHO 15 years ago, we devote a future post to the people here at Brownstone on this article with details Of the Dance of the Seven Veils.
	No, actually, it's the Dance of Seven Definitions and Timelines.
	Which, you know, you could call it the Dance of the Seven Veils, I guess.
	And then, you know, after that, you have Salome cuts her head off and puts it on a platter, doesn't she?
	But they said, we can prove this.
	Once the red button had been pressed back in 2009, 2010...
	The go was automatically given for the distribution of stockpiled antivirals and the rollout of pre-tested pre-pandemic vaccines Which arrived too late to halt the one the waning pandemic, but not too late to cause rare and nasty harm and children Catalepsy narcolepsy things like that The antiviral stockpile was created and still is there at great public expense when we expose the extensive reporting bias and the ghostwriting
	affecting the Tamiflu trials We publicly asked the WHO whether they had read the clinical study reports or trusted Mega-journal articles when making policy and we never got a straight answer answer.
	Then the British medical journal's Deborah Cohen discovered that the relevant WHO guidelines were written by some pharma KOLs, key opinion leaders, who had contributed their names to the Tamiflu publications.
	The Council of Europe and the French Senate made a lot of noise, but it was all swiftly forgotten.
	Isn't that the case always? Somebody finds out about this.
	I remember the Italian member of their legislature was screaming in the summer of 2020, look at this.
	You know, these numbers about people dying, it's all bogus.
	You're killing people with these measures and everything.
	It's just screaming. I thought, finally, somebody will listen to it.
	They just moved him out of the way.
	Moved them out of the way very much like you see the Member of Parliament who has been blowing the whistle on deaths with a jab, Andrew Bridgen.
	Do you think people are now coming around?
	Because you've been fighting to have this debate for quite a while, haven't you?
	Well, the evidence was pretty considerable 18 months ago when I first spoke out.
	I mean, it's overwhelming now.
	Every week there's more evidence.
	Paper out last week in Japan of...
	A clear link now between people who've had the boosters and increasing cancer.
	We know why. It's the SV40, the Simeon virus 40 promoter region that Pfizer didn't disclose her in their vaccines.
	I mean, there's a clear link with promoting cancer.
	And so are you seeing more MPs now than before?
	No, the MPs have put their hands in the blood up to their armpits most of them.
	They've put out thousands, hundreds if not thousands of letters saying that the vaccines are safe and effective over the last few years.
	There's a general election coming later this year and they really just want to hold the line until after the general election because on both sides of the House there's so much political capital that the vaccines are safe and effective, which they're neither safe nor effective.
	I was thrown after the Conservative Party for tweeting that a leading cardiologist had said that the vaccine rollout is the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust.
	I'm afraid I think it's going to be bigger than the Holocaust because I think we've got to be somewhere between 10 and 20 million people have been killed by these experimental vaccines worldwide and it's still going up.
	Well, I think Diogenes can stop looking for an honest man.
	I think we found one. One.
	One in the UK, in Parliament.
	They kicked him out because he said that cardiologists said it's going to be like a Holocaust.
	Like the Holocaust. He wasn't denying the Holocaust.
	He was saying it was going to be a massive murder like that.
	Andrew Bridgen said, well, it's actually going to be more than that.
	Don't criticize Israel.
	Even if it is true, you will be punished by that.
	And that's why they use that as an excuse.
	Again, anti-Semitism has now become the accusation that they throw against people just like racism.
	You're racist, you're anti-Semitic, and we're going to cancel you, we're going to censor you.
	Do you really, I've got to say to people who are Jewish, do you really want to be associated with blanket censorship?
	I don't think you do.
	I think it's a very foolish strategy.
	Nevertheless, what he had to say, he said, well, are there other politicians who are joining it?
	No, no. They got their hands in the blood.
	They got their hands in the blood all the way up to their armpits, he said.
	I've said for the longest time, it's like the Agatha Christie thing.
	Murder on the Orient Express, except this is murder on the Warp Speed Express.
	They all had a hand in killing.
	And they are all going to hang together to try to shut this down.
	We should make sure they'll hang together in other ways.
	A 64-page international health regulation document has a lot in it, as they said.
	Here's a few gems that we selected for their fragrance.
	The word shall appears 364 times.
	And just 64 pages.
	In other words, about six times per page, you have the word shall.
	They're talking about ordering us.
	They've got orders for us.
	Everything here is in order.
	You must do this.
	You shall do this.
	You should also be aware that there will be an implementation committee with a chair and all of the other paraphernalia of bureaucracy and observers, monitors.
	You think maybe these same people, you know, the people who put, you have to pay for your monitors, and they go on the fishing boat, so now you're going to have to pay for your monitors at the college.
	You think they might do that to us as well?
	Well, yeah, probably would.
	As a matter of fact, when they talk about this, they said, we suspect we know who will pay for this.
	Here's a list of observers.
	And this is from the document.
	They say, for the purposes of attending and addressing the IC Committee referenced to observers, it is understood to refer to the Holy See, the Vatican, Palestine, Gavi, that's the vaccine organization that Bill Gates has put through, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, the Order of Malta, The Order of Malta?
	Get the Freemasons in here.
	Whatever. The International Committee of the Red Cross.
	The International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.
	The Interparliamentary Union.
	The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.
	Because, you know, they love these PCR tests, I guess.
	The United Nations and other intergovernmental organizations with which the WHO has established effective relations under Article 70 of the Constitution, the European Union, and non-state actors in official relations with WHO. And they sarcastically said, well, they forgot to include Freemasonry, Spectre, and Monty Python's Traveling Circus.
	This is insane.
	Absolutely insane.
	They do have the Order of Malta in there, whatever, and the Holy See of the Vatican, and Bill Gates.
	Bill Gates gets right up there at the front, and Palestine.
	Why is Palestine up there at the front, you may ask?
	Well, the...
	The decision instruments that constitute a public health emergency of international concern are things like this.
	Let me read some of these to you.
	This is, again, from the IHR. Is the number of cases and or number of deaths for this type of event large for the given place, time, or population?
	Well, it wasn't when they declared the global...
	I mean, you know...
	Handful of people in China that were said to have died with a positive PCR test.
	Essentially, nobody dying in the United States when you had Alex Azar declare the emergency from a health scientific perspective.
	Trump did it on March the 13th to release the money, but there still wasn't any epidemic anywhere, let alone a pandemic anywhere.
	No deaths. Then this has the potential to have a high public health impact.
	And here's examples.
	Of what they would consider to be a high public health impact.
	So if things like this were to happen, the WHO believes that they should have, shall have, let's just say that, shall have the authority to lock us down.
	An event caused by a pathogen with high potential to cause an epidemic.
	Oh, it's got potential for an epidemic.
	It's not an epidemic. Indication of a treatment failure, of an emerging antibiotic resistance.
	So, if their drugs don't work, That's one of the signs that they could lock us down.
	We got lots of drugs that don't work.
	Event represents a significant public health risk, even if no or very few human cases have been identified.
	So in other words, it's got a potential.
	And it's also significant health risk, even though we've not identified any cases.
	And nobody's died.
	You see how they're redefining a pandemic?
	The cases are reported amongst health staff.
	Well, the population is at risk, especially vulnerable people.
	Refugees, people who have a low level of immunization, children, elderly, undernourished, the poor, LGBT trainees, furries.
	Furries are at risk with this stuff.
	Something about it just multiplies with furries.
	I don't know. Concomitant factors that may hinder or delay the public health response.
	Such as unfavorable weather conditions.
	Because climate change.
	I know, nobody's died yet, but you know, that's one of the things.
	And if there's climate change, it's a pandemic anyway, right?
	An event in an area with a high population density.
	An event. What is the event?
	Because they've already ruled out the fact that somebody has to be sick or dead from this.
	The spread of toxic, infectious, or otherwise hazardous materials that may be occurring naturally or otherwise.
	See, it's very urgent for us to do something to stop this stuff at the state level.
	Because you and I know that nothing is going to be done by Trump or by Biden.
	Nothing will be done by the Congress, whether it's Democrats or Republicans, to stop any of this stuff.
	The Senate will pretend that this is ratified, even without doing a ratification.
	They're going to betray us on this like they have everything else.
	They're going to betray us on this just like they did with the Paris Climate Accord, just like they did with the declarations of an emergency in 2020.
	And so they said, well, here's the way this will probably work.
	We regret to tell you, ladies and gentlemen, that we're currently in a public health emergency because at least three of these conditions are currently met.
	And that's, like I was saying, you know, we got drugs that don't work on rhinovirus and on the parainfluenza virus.
	We got some things out here that don't work.
	And even though nobody's really dead or dying, we don't have an epidemic, certainly not a pandemic.
	A pandemic is an epidemic everywhere, right?
	We don't have an epidemic anywhere.
	There's not a pandemic, but we have the potential for this because we know of some things out there for which they have drugs that don't work.
	That's pretty much every disease and sickness.
	They've got drugs that don't work.
	So get ready for another round of lockdowns.
	Apart from all these marginal issues, all else is okay.
	So who cares about sovereignty?
	Certainly not the who.
	Yeah, don't get fooled again.
	Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles!
	And the sweet sounds of Motown.
	Find them on the oldies channel at APS radio dot com.
	You're listening to the David Knight show.
	Well let's talk about the power play.
	By Larry Fink and Black Rock and these various governments that are trying to use the climate MacGuffin to control us.
	On Rumble, BWC C6AD9.
	Psalm 2727.
	the Lord is my light and my salvation.
	Whom shall I fear?
	The Lord is the strength of my life.
	Of whom shall I be afraid?
	Absolutely right.
	And that's what we need to come back to.
	There is no reason for us to fear or panic about anything, really.
	We just had that bishop who was attacked by that squatter, one of the newcomers.
	And he said in the hospital, he said, I forgive him.
	He had a lot more to say about that yesterday.
	I said when he came out, he had a white patch on his eye.
	I didn't know what that was about, but he has now said he's lost his eye.
	But in essence, what he said, he was speaking in another language, which is why I don't have the clip here, with subtitles.
	But essentially what he said was, it's a small price for me to pay.
	He said, Christ paid far more than that for me.
	And he said, and I gladly give my eyes to Muslims if they could understand what the truth is and see God's forgiveness, to paraphrase what he was having to say.
	He has really stood strong in all of this.
	And he's also stood for free speech, as you have the Australian government trying to censor X and not show the attack.
	People need to see the attack so they can understand the forgiveness, don't they?
	So the U.S. is pledging to completely ban coal.
	Earlier this week, all G7 nations agreed to shut down their coal plants by 2035 at the latest.
	We've got less than 10 years, folks.
	Isn't that interesting? I've shown many times the Newsweek and Time magazine from 1979 where they said, we're going to be out of oil and natural gas by the mid-80s.
	But we've got 666 years of coal.
	Well, we got it.
	But they're not going to let us use it within the next 10 years.
	They're going to shut it down. So that includes the United States.
	We still have, in the United States, more than 200 coal-fired power plants, which could be operated cleanly.
	That's an additional expense that they wouldn't require of China or India, but we could still do it because we have the fuel.
	But no, they're going to shut them down.
	And of course, when the G7 nations get together and agree to shut everything down within the next 10 years, that does not include China and India because of the Paris Climate Accord.
	Which exempted them. And again, the people who believed all this climate nonsense and the alarmism were very alarmed.
	They said, this is about global warming.
	How are you going to give the two biggest countries a pass on all this stuff?
	All you're doing is transferring money and economic power to those two countries.
	They got it right about that.
	They can't see the rest of the stuff, but they certainly saw that with clarity.
	And yet, you had Kerry say that he and Obama had self-ratified this treaty.
	And Trump played along with it.
	Did not get rid of it, even though he was told to.
	Well, I'll get rid of it after the 2020 election, he said.
	And he did, and then immediately Biden put it back in.
	But he left it there for the entire four years that he was in office.
	Because you don't want to interrupt any of these plans, you see.
	You could declare that it's done, and then a month later, Biden puts it back in.
	But it would have been a problem for the globalists if Trump would have shut it down for four years.
	So wasn't it nice that he just didn't do it for some reason?
	I'm sure it wasn't a betrayal of us or anything like that in the background.
	I'm sure Trump would never betray us to the globalist.
	Because we all know how opposite he is of the globalist.
	You'd have to be crazy to think that Trump was on the side of the globalist by looking at everything that he did.
	Anyway, so as a New American points out, China and India...
	Or putting up new coal plants faster than the West is shutting theirs down.
	This is not about what they say it's about.
	It's never about what they say it's about.
	And so now an interesting dynamic has come up.
	Because they're talking about artificial intelligence in Silicon Valley.
	They've given up on manufacturing steel and all the rest of this stuff, and they don't care.
	However, their data industry is very power-intensive.
	And so, Silicon Valley AI is running on eastern coal.
	It's an article from Epoch Times.
	And they're right about that. That is what is powering.
	It's eastern coal that is powering the artificial intelligence and everything else that these computer technocrats are doing.
	It's also powering the American government and its surveillance state and what it is doing to store and everything that has ever happened on the Internet.
	So that once they get to fast enough computers, once they get to quantum computing or something like that, they can go back in and get everything that everybody's ever done that they could attack somebody for.
	So they've been storing all this stuff at great expense, great expense in terms of money, but especially in terms of energy and water, storing it in desert places and using all the water, more water than a town would use, more power than a town would use.
	Forget about crypto mining.
	They want data mining for artificial intelligence than for the CIA. So it takes a lot of energy, says Epoch Times, to run those hot servers and the air conditioning that is needed to keep them cool.
	Artificial intelligence requires even more servers and energy.
	As real data reported, Silicon Valley vies with San Francisco as the AI capital of the world.
	And so far, California remains ahead of everyone else, including Communist China and the race for AI dominance.
	so The problem for them is That when it comes to making anything Whether it means that you're gonna manufacture cars or you're gonna manufacture steel or you're gonna manufacture large language models You got to have cheap energy Cheap energy is not just about our economy. It's not just about our quality of life. It is also about our life expectation as well and
	So the attacks on our energy Are an attack on every aspect of our lives and our society.
	So where would San Francisco and Silicon Valley AI companies?
	conscious of the need of energy from such renewable sources as Wind and solar energy where would they get the energy for their AI servers?
	Would they get them from California energy companies?
	Especially from Northern California's PG&E? Well, actually, no.
	They're getting this, many of them, and there's massive servers that are setting up In the Virginia area, which are being run on coal from West Virginia.
	As I pointed out, California imports most of their energy.
	So they can virtue signal about how they're going to shut down coal, all the rest of the stuff, but they're going to import their energy.
	Energy internet data centers are fueling the drive to an old power source, coal.
	That's the headline from the Washington Post just two weeks ago.
	And so the dateline there was out of Charlestown, West Virginia.
	It reported surveyors are eyeing space for yet another power line next to the property, a line that will take electricity generated from coal plants in West Virginia to address a drain on power driven by the world's internet hub in Northern Virginia, 35 miles away.
	That's right. It is the world's internet hub.
	70% of global digital traffic Going through this internet hub that's in Northern Virginia.
	And that's being run on coal.
	There, massive data centers with computers processing nearly 70% of global digital traffic are gobbling up electricity at a rate officials overseeing the power grid say is unsustainable unless two things happen.
	Number one, they've got to have several hundred miles of new transmission lines be built.
	Slicing through neighborhoods and farms in Virginia and three neighboring states to get to the coal.
	And also, number two, they have to have antiquated coal-powered electricity plants that have been scheduled to go offline will need to keep running.
	You shut those things down.
	You're going to shut down not only global digital traffic, but you're also going to take a big hunk out of the spies in Washington, D.C. This is, by the way, the best and the only argument that I've ever seen for stopping coal.
	It stopped the government.
	These people, they just, they're not that smart.
	You know, they've got these long-range plans about how they're going to control us, but they really can't manage it, can they?
	So, all this stuff is being processed in Northern Virginia, the center of the U.S. government, and a major location for these server farms.
	And, you know, so there, and in California, where they want to shut this stuff down, they're the ones who are most dependent on coal.
	Why? Well, because, just like with a factory...
	You can't cycle the power up and down.
	You can't have brownouts and all the rest of this stuff.
	You've got to have solid, continuous power.
	And that's true if you want to manufacture steel, and it's even more true, perhaps, if you want to manufacture your data mining.
	You've got to have dependable, solid, steady-state power, and you're not going to get that from solar or wind.
	So, with Amazon Web Services pursuing a $35 billion data center expansion in Virginia, Rural portions of the state are the industry's newest target for development.
	That growth means big revenue for the localities that host the football field size buildings.
	Lots of power, lots of air conditioning, big buildings.
	Loudoun collects $600 million in annual taxes from Amazon's computer equipment inside these gigantic buildings.
	Prince William is the second largest market.
	It collects $100 million per year.
	It's going to eviscerate their tax base.
	It's going to destroy their economy if they shut down the coal.
	And so, what is their response to all of this?
	Well, Larry Fink understands it.
	Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, and he was explaining this to people at the World Economic Forum.
	About how they could all make money off of this.
	He said the next AI trade, because that's what's been driving the stock market, is artificial intelligence.
	He said the next trade on AI is going to be the power to run the AI. He said there is going to be a big shortage of power.
	So, as Biden and these others are trying to short power, he's going long on power.
	Now, is he turning to coal?
	You might guess maybe they would, with a name like BlackRock, go for coal.
	But no, actually, you know, he does mention the coal stuff, but perhaps it's going to be nuclear.
	Anyway, artificial data centers, electrification of the economy, and on-shoring trends will result in a major upgrade of the nation's power grid.
	Except that they're trying to destroy the power grid.
	And, of course, he has been a part of this with his ESG stuff.
	And so now that they've taken ESG away, he's got a new strategy.
	Didn't take him very long. We can do a power reset.
	We can tear down the existing power infrastructure and grid.
	And then the climate cult corporations can do that.
	And then, you know, they come back around with this new power.
	And, of course, it's not going to be enough for all this.
	So we'll have to kind of ration this.
	And the way we'll ration it is by charging people a lot more money.
	So let's destroy the existing power structure that's out there.
	We'll put everything on the grid, destroy the inputs into the grid, but we'll take over these new ways to generate power that'll be approved by the government as the only source.
	We'll be in on the ground floor of that, and because there'll be a shortage, we'll be able to charge people premium prices for it as well.
	He says, I do believe that to properly build out AI, we're talking about trillions of dollars of investing in power.
	So data centers today could be as much as, and he said this, actually 200 megahertz.
	I saw that and I thought, what's he talking about?
	He meant to say megawatts.
	He said megahertz.
	I went back and looked at the tape because I thought, did they get that wrong when they transcribed it?
	No, he actually said megahertz.
	And then he said something like, but we're going to need gigawatts, Marty.
	No, he did actually get to gigawatts.
	He said, now they're talking about data centers being one gigawatt.
	He said, that's enough to power a city, he said.
	Or, you know, send you back in time.
	Either way. Actually, I prefer to go back in time.
	He pointed out, they spoke with the head of one tech company who said their data centers currently require about 5 gigawatts, or gigawatts, depending on who is a professor, or I guess hertz, right?
	If it's Larry Fink, it's a 5 gigahertz gigahertz.
	If it's the professor from back then, it's 5 gigawatts.
	But anybody else would say 5 gigawatts of power.
	He said, by 2030, the same person told me that the number could jump up to 30 gigawatts.
	The amount of power that's needed to use AI has a huge impact on society, said Fink.
	Oh, isn't that an amazing insight?
	He realizes that now.
	After working so hard to shut it all down with ESG, now it's important.
	And now we need to pay him after he's destroyed stuff.
	Yeah, if this is a situation, if all of a sudden, you know, you've got these massive projects that are going to be using, that are using 5 gigawatts now, are going to be using 30 gigawatts by 2030.
	Maybe it's not a good idea for us to put all of our cars on the grid.
	Maybe it's not a good idea for us to put off all of our cooking and all of our heating and all the rest of the stuff.
	Maybe we shouldn't be putting everything on the grid, you think?
	Oh no, that works out for him too.
	He then asks, so where's the power going to come from?
	Are we going to get it off the grid?
	And what does that mean for elevated energy prices?
	And you can just see him rubbing his hands together like a frisky little fly or something, right?
	Fink then said, this is a huge investment opportunity.
	He said the world is going to be short power.
	Short power, he emphasized.
	And to power these data companies, you can't have intermittent power like wind and solar.
	You need dispatchable power because they can't turn off and on these data centers.
	I've played for you the presentation thing that I did with the graphics and stuff 15 years ago.
	When we were fighting the first renewable energy mandates in Colorado, and I showed by expanding the size of the different power plants to show what they were putting out, the fact that you've got intermittent power coming out of wind and solar, and you have to back that up and make it steady state.
	So what were they using to back up the virtue signaling power of wind and solar?
	Well, they were using coal. Using coal, natural gas, and things like that.
	So as those would fail or go out, you would ramp up and speed up the coal stuff.
	So instead of the coal running at steady state, it's going off and on and off and on, higher and lower, higher and lower.
	And as we pointed out, it's just like your car.
	If you're driving your car, steady state on the highway, you're going to get your best mileage.
	But if you're in the city, stop and go, stop and go, stop and go.
	You use more energy.
	And you also have higher emissions, don't you?
	And so it was counterproductive and it was stupid.
	And it's still stupid 15 years later.
	Except now, Larry Fink has figured out how to make a fortune.
	more money than anybody will ever make off of this stupidity.
	They're not smart cities, they're stupid cities.
	Everything that's labeled as smart is stupid.
	He said, you need to have dispatchable power because they can't turn off and on these data centers, just like a factory.
	So what kind of clean, reliable energy could he be hinting at?
	Well, Zero H says, maybe nuclear, right?
	They said back in 2020, December, 2020, we had an article by Uranium.
	Is this the beginning of the next ESG craze?
	The federal government is expected to continue restarting shuttered nuclear power plants in the coming years.
	Well, you know, that's fine.
	As one person said, I forget who said this quote, talking about nuclear power plants.
	That's one hell of a way to boil water.
	And it's a very complicated and very dangerous way to boil water and it also has other unsolved problems like what do you do with the spent nuclear waste besides just leaving it there for a thousand years for somebody else to figure out the problem while they try to protect it from any accidents.
	I'm kind of an old-fashioned guy.
	I think we ought to have the problems worked out before we force people to use electric cars running off of lithium batteries or before we force people to use nuclear power.
	If we don't have these things worked out, it's not that these are not problems that can't be solved, but why don't we, before we go into it in such a big way, why don't we try to solve these problems?
	No, no, we're just going to roll into it.
	So, you know, a lot of people are looking at it saying, I can't afford to live, right?
	Because what are they doing?
	They're ramping up. You look at the inflation on food.
	You look at the inflation on power.
	It truly is amazing.
	If prices were only rising at 3.5%, we wouldn't really be caring about it.
	But we know that that's much higher because we know how they've manipulated the inflation calculations.
	Fox Business is reporting the cost of energy is up 36.9%.
	It's up 37%, just like food, right?
	And, of course, they'll always come back.
	They'll play games with things like computers.
	It's one of the things that they use to manipulate the inflation down.
	Saying, well, the new computers are selling for about the same amount of dollars that they did before.
	And, look, they're faster.
	So we're going to say that the price is actually, the effective price has actually gone down.
	They play those types of games.
	But we know that when it comes to food and to energy and things that we absolutely must have, that there's been a tremendous amount of inflation.
	And so... With this kind of inflation, you need to have some kind of, personally, some kind of a hedge against that.
	Gold, Bitcoin, something like that.
	There was an article about a Chipotle sandwich that was something like $37.
	Forty pieces of chicken McNuggets in California, where Newsom has artificially raised the price of things there, messing with the minimum wage.
	Because I think he's trying to push people into AI and robotics.
	Anyway, a 40-piece order of chicken McNuggets.
	Two orders of large fries, $25 there.
	So we all, you don't need me to tell you about prices of things everywhere.
	We know what is happening with inflation.
	So we're going to see a lot more inflation when it comes to power.
	It's amazing to me to see how similar this is in so many different ways to the 1970s, except...
	That instead of OPEC coming in and trying to punish us, because we were allied with Israel, so they decided to punish the United States, but of course it created a global situation of stagflation, and it always kicks off with the energy.
	If you mess with the energy, that's like a value-added tax of everything that people do, because everything is being transported multiple times.
	And so that is at the heart.
	And that's the very first thing that Biden did when he took office.
	Immediately, he started attacking energy production.
	And so a lot of shuttered nuclear power plants could be turned on, says the director of the U.S. Energy Department's loan program's office.
	There's a couple of nuclear power plants we probably should and can turn back on.
	Well, if they turn them back on, Where are they going to get the uranium for the fuel?
	Because at the same time, you've got the American government, the federal government, at the same time they're saying, well, maybe our way to get out of this problem that we've created is to start up these nuclear power plants.
	But the same Biden administration wants to ban uranium from Russia.
	Officials from the White House, National Security Council, the Department of Energy, and other top-level officials have discussed reducing reliance on Russian uranium imports.
	They will never allow us to use the coal to make that up, though, right?
	And why would we rely on stuff from China when they're burning coal?
	And we're not allowed to use coal when we got coal resources that are as much, if not more so, than China.
	China's getting its coal from North Korea, other places like that.
	We've got a lot of coal, but we're not going to be allowed to do that.
	And we're not going to be allowed to import Russian uranium.
	How much of our uranium do we get from Russia?
	Well, 24%, so about a quarter of it.
	So, you know, we got 75%.
	We take 25% off.
	You know, when you start doing that with everything, pretty soon you don't have anything that's working.
	You know, it could still do it, but we're going to have to charge you a lot more.
	And then when it comes to producing this domestically, if we want to produce uranium domestically, Don't you know that the EPA and another dozen bureaucracies will come in to shut down domestic production of uranium?
	You know they're going to find something.
	Because this is not about CO2. This is about shutting this country down.
	Just like what we saw with Trader Johnson.
	You know, it's not about peace.
	It's not about winning any wars.
	It's about making sure that we've got another group of people that we can bring in to make even more chaos here in the United States.
	We'll be right back. Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
	From country to blues, classic hits to news, APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
	Get details at APSradio.com.
	Venturesons. Teleprom solution www.ottobock.com www.ottobock.com
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Let's talk a little bit about money, and let's talk about Bitcoin, because I think this is a great story.
	I've had this for a couple of days before I get to it here, but there was, a few years ago, Janet Yellen was as chair of the Federal Reserve.
	She was giving testimony in Congress.
	And as she was talking, there were a couple of younger guys in the back, and she's talking about what she's going to do with the economy.
	They wrote down on their yellow pad, buy Bitcoin, and held it up over her shoulder.
	Kind of photobombed her.
	There you go. There's a picture.
	Isn't that great? Buy Bitcoin.
	Now, here's where it gets really interesting.
	That pad, that yellow pad where they wrote, buy Bitcoin, has now just sold at auction for a little over $1 million.
	They sold that pad for about 16 Bitcoins, says Zero Hedge.
	I think that's the ultimate revenge, isn't it?
	The report notes of the sign quickly became iconic.
	And the crypto community symbolizing the industry's revival.
	Bitcoin's price soared from about $2,300 to a peak of nearly $74,000 in March.
	Boosted by major financial firms like Fidelity and BlackRock as retail interest came around, early Bitcoin memorabilia like the pad regained popularity.
	They said, NFTs?
	Well, not so much.
	Isn't that an irony, right?
	Yeah. When all the stuff with NFTs and all the, you know, I'll buy that meme or whatever, that it's a piece of paper on a yellow pad with that thing scratched on it, that becomes maybe one of the most valuable pieces of memorabilia.
	And it's paper! It's paper, like their currency, huh?
	So the page with the sign drawing...
	Show that other picture that's a little bit further down.
	I guess that's the one, yeah.
	I guess that's the picture that they put up for the purpose of the auction.
	And you've got...
	You got people on either side of that holding it with white gloves.
	Buy Bitcoin scratched on there.
	The page with the sign drawing was removed from the notepad shortly after the hearing.
	It has since been reattached with clear archival wire.
	That's the description from the auction and the picture.
	It was created by Christian Langellis, a 22-year-old intern at the Cato Institute, and he showed it during a 2017 House Financial Service Committee hearing featuring Janet Yellen, who was Fed Chair then.
	She's now the head of the Treasury Department for Biden.
	After being televised, Langellis was escorted out.
	The auctioned item, described as, quote, ink drawing on legal pad, also includes his notes from the session.
	There you go. That's even...
	I guess his notes are where he's scribbling there.
	That's even better.
	It's got all these bonuses in there.
	And in Zimbabwe, their new gold-backed currency, the sixth time they've tried to redo the currency...
	They call it the Zig.
	Zig. Sounds like a cartoon character who's always desperate.
	The American Institute for Economic Research says, during the peak of its 2008 hyperinflation, Zimbabwe experienced a catastrophic economic downturn characterized by the issuance of billion and trillion dollar banknotes.
	And of course, we had Jack Lawson who does the Civil Defense Manual.
	You find it at civildefensemanual.com.
	He was actually in Zimbabwe.
	He used to live there. He used to fight the Marxists that were there.
	The Marxists won. And then destroyed the currency.
	He has a trillion dollar Zimbabwe note for what it's worth, which is probably nothing.
	Worthless. Just, you know, trillion.
	It's just like a PCR test.
	You know, the trillion dollar magnification test.
	Of Zimbabwe dollar.
	It's kind of like the 40 cycles, the 1.1 trillion times magnification of whatever it is that you're looking for with your PCR test.
	They're not the gold standard, as Reuters is saying.
	It's garbage.
	But now they're trying to get to a gold standard.
	So Zimbabwe has a new gold-backed coin.
	Their inflation is currently now at 55%.
	It's not as big as it used to be, but it's still pretty bad because they are Marxists, you know, like Biden and the rest of them.
	So they have had a resurgence of inflation currently at 55%.
	They've had a return of the U.S. dollar to the euro to the South African rand as de facto currencies and the necessity of using large physical stacks of bills to To purchase basic commodities like bread and eggs.
	Here's an idea. Instead of doing a gold-backed currency, why don't you have this Cato Institute intern?
	Do a bunch. He's got more paper on that yellow pad.
	And he can write on, buy Bitcoin, and just start handing that out to people, and you can use that as currency.
	On April 5th, a new currency was announced, the ZIG. It's supposed to be like Zimbabwe gold, but I think it sounds like Ziggy, the cartoon character.
	Because this is a joke, isn't it?
	I mean, the Marxist economy and the Marxist government, when it comes to finances, they truly are a joke.
	The Ziggy marks a sixth attempt by the Zimbabwean government and the central bank to introduce a currency unit that sets its monetary house in order.
	Well, you're going to have to get rid of the Marxist and not just add a zig.
	Because whenever you put a zig, they always zag in the marketplace.
	Stagflation! Stagflation is back.
	And how do we get that? Well, we get it by attacking the energy supply.
	Same way we got it in the 1970s, except this time I think it's going to be a lot worse.
	I think Gerald Salenti is right. He's been saying this for years.
	It's not going to be stagflation.
	It's going to be dragflation.
	And of course, a lot of that had to do with Janet Yellen, who was in place of the Fed while Trump was president.
	You know, I tell you what, there is such an important difference between Trump and Biden.
	You want to know the difference in the economics?
	You can have Janet Yellen in as the Fed chair under Trump, or she can be head of the Treasury Department under Biden.
	There's your big difference.
	What chair is Janet Yellen going to set in?
	Or the CIA, right?
	You can have Bill Barr, the George H.W. Bush partner, to rebuild the CIA after the church committee hearings.
	Or you can have Gina Haspel, who worked with George W. Bush, to lie us into the Iraq war based on torture.
	Now, which Bush CIA official do you want?
	In your administration.
	Well, Trump's got his pick.
	He can pick one of two CIA traitors.
	One of two Bush administrations.
	Isn't that great? So stagflation is back.
	Maybe dragflation. And again, this is by design.
	And by Janet Yellen.
	And the FDIC has now seized control of Philadelphia's Republic First Bank.
	They said it's due to overexposure to real estate.
	That would be commercial real estate, which is at the center of the banking collapse, as we've been talking about for so long.
	By the way, you can get Gerald Slenty's Trends Journal at a 10% discount if you use the code NIGHT. That's at trendsjournal.com.
	He's been talking about this for the longest amount of time.
	There's going to be, you know, dragflation.
	There'll be commercial real estate bust.
	And that commercial real estate bust is going to drag down the banks.
	It's all happening, just as he said.
	And then, of course, you know, he'll tell you what he sees coming, even if he doesn't like it.
	And he's been very accurate about that.
	Which city has the most billionaires in 2024?
	Well, it used to be China.
	That's another thing we've talked about for the longest time.
	The fact that China was in the catbird seat until they killed themselves with the Zero COVID initiative.
	And of course, you know they're going to do that because China has always been the beta test site for the globalist agenda.
	They've always been on board with it.
	When it came to depopulation, they jumped in there and did exactly what Kissinger and the globalists wanted them to do, the one-child policy and all the rest of this stuff.
	They did everything just like everybody else this time around, as we were talking about yesterday.
	That was the one thing that Kit Knightley at offguardian.org in the UK said.
	He said, that was a real tell, wasn't it?
	That all of the governments around the world were doing exactly the same thing at exactly the same time?
	That was a real tell that it was fake, that it was organized, that it was a conspiracy.
	That's what I've been saying all along.
	They're marching in lockstep, every single one of them.
	It doesn't matter if it's Trump or Trudeau.
	It doesn't matter if it's communist China or Trump.
	They're all doing exactly the same thing.
	This zero COVID stuff.
	And so now that they did the zero COVID stuff, they've shot themselves in the foot.
	It used to be that the city that had the most billionaires in it was in China, in Beijing.
	And now that has fallen to fourth place.
	Shanghai is in fifth place.
	Hong Kong is in seventh place.
	One, two, and three is New York, London, and Mumbai.
	So, when you look at the 20 cities that have the most billionaires, China is dropping down very rapidly.
	And, of course, they've been at the forefront of everything that the globalists want.
	Including the IDs, the social credit stuff, which they did that first, and then that got copied by everybody with the vaccine passports.
	The social credit system in China.
	Dandan's criminal, academic, and medical records will feed into her score, as well as state security assessments.
	Her shopping habits will be another measure.
	Her score could even change in real time, depending on what she puts in her trolley.
	you Buy a lot of alcohol suggests dependence.
	Lose a couple of points.
	You see how they're laying the foundation for us now?
	Suggest responsibility.
	Yeah. Get some green stuff.
	Late on mortgage payments or your tax return, lose a lot more.
	Yeah, that's why they're seeking to manage and watch everything that we buy.
	You know, just grab it at Amazon and just walk out.
	And the thousand people who are watching you in India being paid slave wages to spy on you and write down what you bought, they will then pass that report along.
	And of course, eventually they'll get it to where they can have computer recognition of that.
	But that's what this is all about.
	They're rolling out that system and they're trying it in China.
	And surprise, surprise, they even had the traffic light system, red, yellow, and green for people of the pandemic stuff.
	It's exactly the plan that they laid out and practiced there.
	And so when we look at what is happening, whether we're looking at inflation and the loss of purchasing power and loss of being able to set aside your labor for being able to use it in the future, or whether we're looking at ways to control you and to monitor you.
	If you want financial transactional privacy, you're going to have to go with cash or you're going to have to go with gold or something like that.
	And if you want protection against their inflation, you can go with gold or Bitcoin or something like that.
	But gold checks all those boxes.
	The long gold trade still has a lot of positive structural things going for it.
	Gold is a loan at the top.
	And this is an article from Zero Hedge.
	And, of course, usually this is...
	Done by people who have a gold system that they're selling, but it's not always that way, and it's not that way in this.
	when you look at volatility, the roller coaster effect, and all the rest of this stuff, gold has been pretty steady.
	And you don't want to have something that truly is a roller coaster.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	And when we come back, we are going to talk about some of the issues around abortion, a lot of stuff happening with that, as well as other political issues that are happening.
	But before we leave this and take a break, I just want to remind people that if you want to get gold and silver, Tony Arterbin of Wise Wolf Gold has set up davidknight.gold.
	That'll let him know that you're coming from this program.
	He's done a lot to support this program over the years.
	And so DavidKnight.gold will take you to Tony Arterbin's Wise Wolf Gold.
	You can buy gold or silver there, large or small amounts.
	You can be a part of Wolfpack and set aside a fixed amount each month that you would like to save of gold and silver.
	And you can take advantage of the buyer's club that is there.
	Because he's got over a thousand people now doing that.
	So that's one way to buy small amounts on a regular basis and still have the buying power as if you were making a large transaction, a way to get more with lower fees.
	So we're going to take a quick break.
	Remember, DavidKnight.gold will take you to Tony Arterman.
	We'll be right back.
	Interested in a curated list of the finest classical music?
	Find it now at APSradio.com.
	♪♪♪
	Liberty. It's your move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Well, I just saw this article and it really struck me.
	A newborn baby found dead in a trash can on the campus of the University of Tampa.
	That's where Karen and I met 50 years ago.
	We had our first date on St.
	Patrick's Day, 1974.
	It's just amazing to see something happen like this in a place that you know.
	And of course, they point out, the police said, you know, there's a lot of resources for somebody who doesn't want a baby.
	You can put your baby up for adoption.
	You can surrender a newborn under the safe havens law in Florida, as well as other things.
	But instead, this person killed it.
	So now the police are going to be looking for them.
	Now, what is the difference, really, when you stop and think about it, between that and the murder of babies who are at full term?
	I've talked many times about the Democrat who is pro-life, radical, left Democrat, but she's pro-life.
	And she didn't find the dead babies in a trash can.
	She found them in some trash that was being taken from the abortion center to be incinerated.
	She found it in Washington, D.C.
	They're trying to put her in jail.
	She put her name on the ballot in a couple of states as a presidential candidate so she could run this ad without having it be shut down because they can't stop this ad showing what a newborn baby that is killed at an abortion center, babies that easily could survive on their own, what it looks like.
	Secular progressive activist.
	Last year, I recovered the remains of these five babies from an all-term abortion center in Washington, D.C. These are the faces of a genocide supported by Joe Biden and my own Democratic Party.
	We can provide for the working class and resist this extremism.
	I am challenging you to never vote for a pro-choice Democrat again.
	I'm Teresa Bakovinak, pro-life Democrat, running for President of the United States, and I approve this message.
	Yeah, I approve that message as well.
	It's horrific to look at that.
	But people need to look at that and understand what this truly is.
	She said abortion is murder.
	And of course, Bill Maurer is very typical of the Democrat Party.
	Yeah, it kind of is murder.
	And I'm okay with that, he said.
	And so what's the difference?
	Well, the mother gets to decide whether the baby lives or not, right?
	And you have Gavin Newsom at the same time all this stuff is happening.
	Gavin Newsom has put together a commercial, and even the mainstream media is criticizing him for how phony it is.
	Talking about how mothers in some states can't get an abortion, he shows a young woman who is handcuffed to a hospital bed.
	As he's telling them, you know, come to California to get your abortion.
	Isn't that amazing?
	It truly is amazing.
	I guess he's also fine with what is kind of murder.
	Well, the question is, the Federalist asks, can we fix a culture if it is hostile to raising children?
	Elon Musk, who has his designs of technocracy, he still wants to have a lot of people.
	I guess he wants to be able to send them to Mars and other places like that.
	But... Can we fix a culture that is hostile to raising kids?
	That is hostile to educating them, really, in a sense.
	A new book came out, Family Unfriendly.
	I looked at this and I thought, well, this is an article written by The Federalist talking about this book by Tim Carney.
	And I thought, well, I'll get him on and talk about it.
	But we have some points of disagreement here.
	All the ways in which our laws and culture are discouraging family formation.
	Much of it we would agree with.
	He says, back in December...
	A viral video series on TikTok celebrated the dinks, the dual income, no kids lifestyle, glorifying their ability to take European vacations, to go crazy with bulk purchases at Costco, to splurge on their pets.
	He said, at first I thought it was a joke.
	Though, as a Federalist executive editor, help me to understand, these unabashedly materialistic young American couples were quite serious.
	They really believed the freedom they enjoyed not having children was a superior form of life to the supposed drudgery that defies the lives of us hapless parents.
	You know, that's a lie that is sold by the media, by the culture to people, that you'll be happier without kids.
	I gotta say, nothing could be further from the truth.
	Anybody who's had kids knows that.
	Knows what a joy that is.
	And yet, we're sold this secular, materialist vision of what happiness is, and it is a lie straight out of the pit of hell.
	Timothy Carney, a happy father of six, does not view children as an obstacle to human happiness, but rather the means of achieving happiness.
	Both for individuals and for society at large.
	When compared to the fathers of the 1970s, the dads of today are far more involved in their children's lives, yet amazingly, mothers' weekly parenting loads since that time have increased by about 50%.
	Carney also blows a hole in the claim that kids are too expensive by observing that wealthy Americans are just as likely as middle-class parents to have a few children.
	Not one driven primarily by financial factors is the issue, but also by cultural ones, in other words.
	It's not just the money thing.
	And, of course, they'll hit people with money at Planned Parenthood, try to talk them into killing their children.
	But I think that one of the things in The Federalist, and perhaps even his book, that they're ignoring here are the medical issues.
	Things that have been done to us through our food, especially through our medicine, through vaccines, other things like that, as a kind of sterilization.
	But there is a big cultural gap.
	They've done a great job of making sure that the majority of women don't want to have a family, don't want to have kids.
	So, whether you're talking about things in terms of raising kids like travel and sports require massive parental commitments.
	No, it doesn't. That's another thing that's been sold to people.
	I know that we had relatives and they were, every time we talked to them, they had kids at the same time we had kids.
	And they were constantly shuffling one child to one sport and, well, I got to go because I got to pick them up at that one.
	I got to drop the other one off of that and I don't have any time to talk.
	It's like, we're just not going to do that.
	And we didn't do that.
	We weren't going to make our family a slave to getting the kids around in these different sports.
	And that's what you have to look at.
	You have to set your own priorities.
	Instead of being pressured by society, well, you've got to go to the good school.
	Oh, well, you've got to have them in this sport and that sport and the other sport.
	No, you don't need to do that.
	Much of what is passed out there as a real issue For people not to have kids are these artificial must-dos that are on all of this, that are put on people.
	He also says helicopter parenting exhausts parents and also discourages larger families.
	Well, again, you know, we used to...
	Tell the kids to go outside.
	That's what Karen was just saying the other day.
	She said, well, she's a kid. Mom would say, it's a sunny day.
	Get outside. Get out.
	Go, go, go. Well, they take the kids away from a parent like that today for no good reason.
	You don't see kids playing outside anymore.
	Why? There's no good reason for that.
	The helicopter parenting, and of course, all that is driven by fear campaigns.
	People are afraid to let their kids be outside.
	So, he encourages...
	This is why I say he's... I got my issues with him.
	At first, I thought, oh, this guy would be a good guy to have on.
	Talk about, you know, he's got big families and he thinks that's a good idea.
	And I was surprised that the Federalists didn't take him to task with this.
	Because he encourages the idea of the 15-minute city.
	It's like, what? What?
	You don't want to put your kids in that kind of an environment?
	Well, I like the 15-minute city where schools...
	And playgrounds and corner stores are all 15 minutes away from home.
	And then it gets worse.
	He urges the federal government to sell off a small portion of its land holdings so that developers can build homes to solve these housing crises.
	No! No! And then he comes in and says, and we need to have, like they do in Europe, the government needs to reward people to have kids.
	Wait a minute. We started out by talking about the fact that people were so focused on money that they didn't want to have kids.
	And so now we're going to come in and pull that in by saying, well, we'll help you with the money.
	We'll ease some of that pain so that you can have kids.
	Folks, we've got to break the materialism.
	It isn't enough to say, well, you like money?
	I'll give you some money to have some kids.
	No, you've got to break the materialism.
	You've got to break the mindset.
	Of the love of money.
	That's the issue here.
	Did people in colonial times, when there was gigantic families and we subdued the continent with the big families, did they get paid by the government to have kids?
	No. No. Do we have to pay people for this?
	Or maybe, you know, even JFK said, if we cut taxes...
	The rising tide will lift all of the boats.
	How about instead of saying we're going to give money to people and we're going to help them partner, we're going to come in and partner with them, which is RFK is saying.
	Well, you know, if we want to stop abortions, we need to understand that we've got to do, we've got to, the government's got to step in and help parents to raise the kids.
	And so we need to come in and get with them at an earlier age and give them more support with more programs and all the rest of the stuff.
	No, no. You want to do things like get government out of people's lives instead of finding ways to get government further entangled.
	Instead of using government to send in all that money with all the strings attached.
	Don't let them tie you up with those financial things.
	Have the kids because it's a good thing.
	Have the kids because you want to spend time with them.
	Have the kids because you want to take them with you to heaven.
	There's a lot of different reasons to have kids.
	Not because the government's going to help you out with the expenses.
	Not because we've got government bribes.
	Because then the government's going to be bribing you later to harm them.
	We've seen that everywhere.
	One would think it'd be easy to persuade young adults to abandon Costco pizza night in favor of bringing a new life into the world.
	to abandon that so that you can pursue an adventure that while terribly taxing is also incredibly exciting and rewarding and yet either that pizza truly is incredible Or we're dealing with a culture that is so morally impoverished, so truly blinkered by self-worship and self-protection, that it's unclear what, if anything, could rouse them from their dogmatic slumber.
	Well, that I agree with from the Federalist.
	So, as we're talking about all this, and RFK Jr.
	talking about what he would do with abortion, how it's a tragedy, but he's not going to stop the mutilation of children.
	He was interviewed by Ben Shapiro.
	On abortion, and Ben Shapiro challenged him in a good way.
	I got a lot of things I disagree with Ben Shapiro on, but he was able to get an interview with RFK Jr., so good for him.
	He won't talk to me.
	But he said he might believe, quote, that every abortion is a tragedy, but not enough for him to do anything about it.
	That's the comment from Faithwire.
	He says, for me, a woman has to make that choice for herself, said RFK. He says, I believe every abortion is a tragedy.
	But he's not going to stop it.
	Just like Bill Maher believes that it's murder, but he's okay with that as well.
	So, when you look at this, he's got more moral authority than most of these libs that are out there.
	Because they demanded that you wear masks and you do lockdowns and you do jabs and they forget about your body, your choice.
	No, we're not going to do any of that. However, you know, and he stood for your body and your choice.
	However, the problem is, is that when you talk about abortion, it is not your body.
	It is somebody else.
	Shapiro interjected that abortion is not just a tragedy, but it is a crime against the child because the child has an independent interest.
	Kennedy said he understands Shapiro's perspective, but he doesn't agree with it.
	Kennedy said, did say abortion is a tragedy, but he failed to explain why he believes that.
	Why is it a tragedy? Is it because you're ripping these kids apart, as we saw in the...
	In the pictures there?
	Shapiro pressed Kennedy to say when he believes the unborn child has independent human rights and should be protected from abortion.
	To which Kennedy said no woman would choose to abort her unborn child eight months into pregnancy unless there were extenuating circumstances, noting that no one in their right mind would do that.
	Well, that's not true. We began with the woman who threw the baby into the trash.
	We began with pictures of babies that were beyond eight months.
	No woman in their right mind would do that?
	Well, that's true. You know, we will never outlaw murder.
	I mean, we have it.
	It's not legal, but we'll never stop it with laws.
	There will always be people who are not in their right mind.
	There will always be people who will do that.
	There will always be people who claim that there's extenuating circumstances.
	And you will always have people We'll be willing to kill other people for money.
	We see that with big pharmaceutical companies.
	We see it with Planned Parenthood.
	There's a lot of people who will kill for cash.
	He says, I have tremendous respect for you, Kennedy told Shapiro, for having absolute moral clarity on that position.
	But I think it's more nuanced and complex than that.
	But he won't say what, you see?
	See, the thing is, is that right and wrong...
	is simple and does come with moral clarity if you have a standard.
	What is your standard of morality?
	RFK shows that he doesn't have one.
	His ethics are situational, which is to say he doesn't have them.
	Trump condemned Kennedy as totally anti-gun and all the rest of the stuff.
	But again, you know, it was Trump who did the precedent of gun control by executive order.
	I want to stay on the abortion stuff.
	A jailed pro-lifer says she was kept in solitary confinement for 22 days, and they left the lights on 24-7.
	These are some of the people who are being arrested.
	Politically persecuted by the Biden administration.
	It's just as amazing to me what the Biden administration is doing to people like this.
	And the January 6th people.
	There was only a few of them who were violent.
	But you look at the thousand or so people that they're going to keep in jail for the rest of their life the way they've been tortured in jail.
	But these are people with a face act.
	They were not harming anyone.
	As a matter of fact, they were trying to keep babies from being ripped apart.
	A jailed pro-life prisoner was paraded in court in full shackles.
	Is that necessary? Like some kind of serial killer cannibal or something?
	Heather Idani, a defendant in the Washington, D.C., face trials.
	22 days of solitary confinement.
	She said she was allowed to walk outside in her cell only for two hours in the middle of the night each day.
	And that the lights of her cell were continually kept on.
	She's been in prison since she was convicted last autumn, but she has more convictions in line because of the fact that we're involved in multiple cities.
	Just like this lady who was in a communist concentration camp, and she's in a wheelchair.
	She's in her 80s, and she says she's reconciled the fact that the Biden administration is going to put her in jail for the rest of her life.
	Fellow pro-life advocate Cal Zastrow, who joined her in another traditional pro-life rescue in Tennessee and has also been convicted of violation of the FACE Act, told LifeSite news that when Idani was brought into the courtroom for a trial in Nashville, the U.S. Marshal had the middle-aged woman shackled at the wrist, the waist, and the feet like a dangerous criminal.
	The marshals and the federal government does that as a way of vengeance.
	They did that to Congressman George Hansen.
	Remember, he took on the IRS and they dieseled him.
	They put him in shackles and put him in a car and moved him around all the time and just destroyed his health.
	And, of course, when it comes to the thing of keeping the light on all the time, the federal government did that.
	Jefferson Davis, after they caught him, kept the lights on all the time, never to try to keep him with sleep deprivation.
	And there are now international rules to fight against that.
	When she was brought in with all these shackles on, the judge was shocked.
	He ordered them removed. And the U.S. Marshals had the arrogance to only remove one wrist to let her right.
	At the insistence of the indignant judge, they took the shackles off of both wrists, but the Marshal left the bars around her waist and her feet.
	This is your government.
	This is your government. This is how close we are.
	This totalitarian dictatorship we've got.
	thank you for listening of biased and false news has become all too common on social media more alarmingly some media outlets publish these dangerous stories without checking facts first unfortunately some members of the media use their platforms to push their own personal bias and agenda to control exactly what people think and this is extremely dangerous to our democracy this is extremely dangerous to our democracy
	this is extremely dangerous to our democracy This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
	Break free from the usual script with The David Knight Show, a fresh perspective bringing you genuine insights on current events.
	But if the show is going to stay on the air, we'll need your continued support.
	Sharing the show, subscribing, and even just hitting the like button all help.
	And if you found our show helpful, Please consider donating and becoming a part of a community that values the truth.

▲