Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 3, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:26

The David Knight Show - 04/03/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 3rd of April, Year of Our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we've got a lot of really strange news.
	We've got a new law here in Tennessee.
	It's not been signed by the governor, but it's been passed an overwhelming majority in the House and Senate to stop mRNA plants.
	They want to inject us through our food, you know, Food and Drug Administration.
	Also, we've got genetic modification, and then they immediately, they create this freak thing, and then they immediately say, well, you know, this might lead to a cure for cancer.
	Or it might cause cancer.
	It's more likely. How do they even get to that kind of an argument?
	But we're going to begin. With the push towards world government through these phony treaties.
	This pandemic treaty is going to be used like the Paris Climate Accord.
	And nobody is really talking about stopping this.
	Instead, we're focused on this professional wrestling contest between Biden and Trump.
	Instead of stopping this medical martial law moving to a global level.
	We'll be right back. And I want to say, there's now a lot of talk in Brownstone, which I know that doesn't have a very large following, certainly not in the public, but you see Bill Maurer talking about it, and some other people talking about the pandemic and how we got this incredibly wrong.
	You have inquiries in Germany inquiries in the UK, but still they're very minority positions and here in the United States We're not even talking about it because we're so focused on this distraction Of presidential politics because folks both Biden and Trump will give us another one of these They will give us another one whenever they are told to do it. And so we're also today going to take a look again at the real government of America the CIA
	The CIA that stays there regardless of who gets elected, you know Biden doesn't even know if he signed a proclamation or not.
	And then Trump just does whatever he is told by the CIA. But as we look at these articles, for instance, from the Brownstone Institute, this one, two weeks to flatten became eight months to change the election.
	Well, that's an interesting take on it.
	Quite frankly, it wasn't about that.
	That is kind of a myopic point of view.
	But we did know that it was going to be disruptive.
	It was going to add a whole new level of corruption, as I've said over and over again on this show, as I said in 2020 in the lead-up to it.
	And you had Bernie Sanders saying it.
	You had Bill Barr saying it.
	I was saying, many people were saying, if you go to a completely vote-by-mail election, you're going to see unprecedented levels of fraud.
	And Trump was fine with that.
	And, you know, they're fine with that now.
	They've decided that they're going to own this new thing, and they can out-cheat the other guys.
	This is the ethics.
	I'm going to go back and review when Mike Pompeo said, yeah, when I went to West Point, we don't lie, we don't cheat, we don't steal, we don't tolerate those who do.
	And then I went to the CIA, and we got classes on that, yeah.
	Well, you know, they've got classes on how to corrupt elections, I think, as well.
	CIA doesn't just do coups in other countries or manipulate elections in other countries.
	They do it here as well.
	They assassinate here as well as abroad.
	Brownstone Institute said in 1845, Congress established Election Day as the Tuesday after the first Monday of November.
	It sought to establish a uniform time for Americans to cast their votes.
	Of course, in North Carolina, we had an election period.
	Ha, ha, ha. I should say comma, or I should say election, dot, dot, dot, because it was an extended period.
	The longest period to vote when I was living in North Carolina of any state, and you did not have to produce any ID. You just give them a name and address, and I've told the story, I won't go into it again, of a friend who was told, you've already voted, and so is this other person at your house.
	That's my mother. She's been dead for years, right?
	Anyway, somebody we personally, well, my brother-in-law knew.
	Historically, voters needed to provide a valid reason, such as illness or military service, to qualify for absentee balance, but no more.
	Not with a pandemic.
	All the rules are gone. Politicians and media outlets ignored rampant voter fraud in the months leading up to the election.
	They treated concerns surrounding absentee voting as obscure conspiracy theories, despite a bipartisan commission describing it as, quote, the largest source of potential voter fraud just a decade earlier.
	Well, of course, as Trump was putting out his CARES Act, as he was berating and saying, we're going to primary out Thomas Massey for opposing the CARES Act and all this PPP stuff, people have now gone public saying, we called them up and said, the way you're running this thing, there's absolutely no controls on this.
	This is going to be the biggest financial fraud we've ever seen.
	And yeah, people are buying Lamborghinis and all the rest of this stuff, especially in Florida.
	They did a whole series of articles about what just happened in Florida.
	There was so much abuse of this program.
	But there was no control on it whatsoever.
	Just like there was no control on the votes.
	Trump just ran with all this stuff.
	Let's just go with it. I don't care.
	Right? Maybe that's how he bankrupted six casinos.
	He doesn't have any idea of how to manage.
	And that's being charitable. That's assuming that he's not a crook, that he's not a tool of the CIA, which I think is the case, quite frankly.
	But in your most charitable interpretation of Trump 2020, it was just a fool at the helm.
	I mean, just an idiot.
	This guy that ran into the bridge in Baltimore, he's got nothing on Trump in 2020.
	Yeah. The question is, why did it lose power?
	But anyway, Trump ignored all these warnings, and then he used it after the fact to grift and to divide.
	I won't play the clip again, but I've played for you many times.
	Steve Bannon, talking to a bunch of Chinese supporters, friends of his CCP pal Guo, you know, the billionaire that they arrested him.
	He was on his yacht, and they arrested him on his yacht.
	But he's talking to these CCP pals.
	He says, here's what's going to happen.
	Regardless of what happens, we're going to say they won, we're going to say we won, and we're going to take this thing.
	They were planning this weeks before.
	He's telling this to them weeks before.
	They planned it long before that.
	It was a plan. And as I said, what difference does it make who you vote for when we have been ruled by bureaucrats for all of 2020?
	They took charge.
	They're unelected. Unaccountable to us?
	And the people that you elected did nothing, whether they're Republicans or Democrats?
	What difference does an election make, really?
	The only place where there was any pushback was at the local level.
	That's why I still say, pay attention to the local level.
	And we're going to talk about that when we get to news.
	An amazingly corrupt California Sheriff's Department Back in the news again, this time with the murder.
	But you know, there's something that everybody is missing on this story.
	They've forgotten the story of the San Bernardino Police Department.
	They've had a lot of scandals.
	But nobody mentions just how corrupt this organization is.
	And we will.
	I'm going to remind everybody.
	Anyway, back to this.
	The administrative state began instituting the infrastructure to hijack the November presidential election.
	That would be the administrative state under Trump, right?
	They don't want to say that because they want to portray in this article.
	I mean, I like Brownstone.
	They do some good work. But because they're focused on concern, they feel like they've got to kiss the ring of Trump.
	And they do. Poor Trump.
	He was just had by all these people.
	He was the head of the administrative state.
	And he had ample warning from everywhere.
	Democrats, Republicans, everybody were warning him about this.
	He played along with all of it.
	And he had a purpose in playing along with all of it.
	And so... In November, 57% of Michigan voters, over 3 million people, cast their ballot by mail.
	That would be November 2020.
	For the first time, the state did not require reason for absentee voting.
	Trump would go on to lose Michigan by just 150,000 votes.
	When Trump signed the CARES Act, only 0.05% of Michigan residents had tested positive for COVID. Were they sick, even?
	Was that 0.05%, 5 one-hundredths of a percent?
	Were they even sick? I bet they weren't.
	Did they have COVID? Did they have a cold?
	Did they have anything special? Can you use the PCR test that way?
	Well, the guy who invented it, Kerry Mullis, said, no, you can't use it that way.
	But he fortunately died somehow, just a couple of months before all this stuff started.
	And I think that it's odd that they...
	They don't present this stuff as Trump policies, but they put it out as if it was a Democrat conspiracy.
	Does that mean that they think that Trump is a Democrat operative?
	That's a possibility.
	He was a Democrat his entire life.
	A New York Democrat.
	Giving them money, partying with them, partying with the Epsteins, partying with the Clintons.
	Going to the World Economic Forum, but of course, he's the total opposite now of the Democrats in New York.
	He's the total opposite of Klaus Schwab.
	Now, the Democrats in New York are trying to get rid of him, but that's part of a Game of Thrones.
	That wasn't what was happening at the beginning of all this stuff.
	You know, this is, he wants to be top dog, he wants to be the only one, and they want to make sure that he's not.
	And so they are very, very competitive in that regard.
	But they're all really working on the same team.
	I mean, it's kind of like when you have these people in the wrestling matches.
	You know, they're heroes in heels, but they all work for the WWE. The CDC intervened in voting protocols, says Jeffrey Tucker.
	Well, yeah, they intervened in pretty much every aspect of our life, didn't they?
	Again, are we now going to focus, this is kind of reminiscent of Tim Pool, when Luke Radowski said, can he just take some responsibility and say, I screwed up?
	Can we do something about that?
	Well, no. Tim Pool says, I am so sick and tired of hearing about that.
	That was four years ago. And yet, they will talk about the election.
	And now they want to talk about the election only in terms of how the pandemic now ruined the election for them.
	Well, California has got a deficit of $222 billion now.
	They were circling the drain, getting ready to go down, but then Trump came to the rescue of grabbing nuisance and gave him so much money that grabbing nuisance got out of debt and then notched his spending up to a new level.
	He had a new credit card.
	So they've got a deficit of $222 billion.
	That means how much they're behind on an annual basis.
	Their cumulative debt...
	It's now $1.6 trillion.
	$1.6 trillion.
	It just keeps escalating, doesn't it?
	And so, when we look at Bill Maurer, he says, you know, we're better off under Biden.
	We don't have the excessive COVID restrictions.
	And that was just recently.
	Just when you think that he's starting to get a clue, he says something stupid like that.
	Here is Maurer talking about how silly the COVID madness was.
	I get it that we didn't know exactly what was happening at the beginning of COVID and some mistakes were inevitable.
	I'm tired of hearing, well, we didn't know.
	No, we didn't. But some people guessed better than others.
	We washed the mail.
	We played baseball in front of cardboard cutouts and ate in parking lots.
	They closed the ocean.
	We banged pots and pans to show our love for nurses and our hatred for people trying to get a baby to sleep.
	For two years, we had to get nostril f***ed every time we left the house.
	We were told to wash our hands every five minutes and don't ever touch your face.
	And if you absolutely must go to the beach for the sake of all that's holy, wear a mask outside.
	Because the last thing you would want to do when a disease is afoot is get fresh air and sunshine and vitamin D. No, much better to stay locked up, stressed out, and day drinking.
	And if you do get COVID, remember, natural immunity is always the worst kind.
	Even if you've had the disease, you need a shit.
	Now, how much of that was Trump and how much of that was Biden?
	They were both doing that.
	Both of them were doing it.
	But yet he's going to fall into this trap.
	And this is why we can't have nice things like freedom and the rule of law.
	Because everybody is so polarized with this partisan nonsense.
	Oh, it was, you know, Biden is much better.
	And you hear the Republicans, oh, Trump was much better.
	No, they were both equally bad.
	They're both in the pocket of the globalists.
	COVID was a lie.
	It says Exposé News.
	Like I said, we see some publications, some side publications like Exposé, like Daily Skeptic in the UK. We see Brownstone Institute.
	We see some pushback by some small committees in Germany, a media outlet there that's a minor media outlet, doing a freedom of information request, getting back a massive amount of paperwork, almost all of it, 100% redacted, 100% redacted.
	And so there's efforts to do this, but the vast majority of people are caught up in this Trump versus Biden.
	COVID was a lie, says Exposé, an illusion created by government to take complete control, and the penny is dropping everywhere.
	Well, I hope that is true.
	Maybe I'm just tired.
	Maybe I'm just tired of saying this and seeing no progress.
	Because, you know, when we got to the summer of 2020, I just couldn't believe that it was still going on.
	I couldn't believe that people went for it in the first place.
	I couldn't believe that people would allow them to shut everything down, even for two weeks.
	And so I was screaming from the rooftop, you know, let's just open this stuff up.
	But you had people like Scott Adams saying, well, you know, I'm sick and tired of these so-called freedom lovers.
	They're getting indistinguishable from sociopaths.
	And then after this stuff was all over, as Bill Maher said, you know, well, we didn't know.
	He says, I get it. It's something that's supposedly new.
	Well, it wasn't a new virus.
	It was a new political agenda.
	It was a new way of addressing a supposed sickness that nobody could see happening because it wasn't happening.
	It was not an epidemic.
	It was not a pandemic.
	It was a global psychological political move.
	And he says, I get it, but you know, come on, you should have figured out some of this stuff.
	The stuff that he's talking about there.
	You don't have to know the background of the CIA germ games that they'd practiced for 20 years.
	You didn't have to know how they had laid the legal framework for all this stuff at the state level to be funded by the federal government with an executive order of an emergency like Trump.
	You didn't have to know all that, although some people did.
	And went along with the lie.
	People like Alex Jones.
	I just saw a thing when I was looking for this Pompeo quote.
	And I couldn't find anybody covering the fact that he said, you know, hey, yeah, we lie, we cheat, we still have classes on it.
	I couldn't find that anywhere. And then finally I found it.
	It's like, ah, good. And it was something that somebody had cut out from my show five years ago, April 2019.
	It's like, am I the only one talking about this stuff?
	2019, I was talking about Pompeii and the CIA were morally and ethically bankrupt and corrupt.
	And it's just really strange.
	And they're in the corner.
	The reason I mention that is because they're in the corner.
	There was a thing from a couple of days ago.
	And Alex Jones said, I'm sorry that I called Glenn Beck a CIA agent.
	I was probably drunk at the time.
	Well, he probably was.
	If he was on air, he was probably drunk.
	But it was Glenn Beck stuck the knife in conservatives back at the Monday Ranch.
	I'll never forget that.
	And he's done it more than once.
	He is an operative just like Alex.
	An operative from the standpoint of going along with this.
	It's the new Mockingbird move, right?
	With the alternative big media.
	The big con.
	The big conservatives. But COVID was a lie.
	And this is coming from a speech that was done last year.
	And it's now gone viral on social media.
	I think it was in German because it took place in German.
	We've lived through a dark time, said Professor Dr.
	Stefan Hamburg. In a speech that was delivered last year, a new lease on life going viral on X, he said, the penny is dropping everywhere.
	I wouldn't want to be a COVID cultist, jabaholic, doctor, nurse, or one that knows deep down what's going, what happened.
	Well, yeah, can you imagine somebody who is a COVID cultist, a jabaholic, doing something like running for political office?
	If President or Senate or Congress, yeah, they all were jabaholics.
	They all were cultists.
	Every single one of these people in Fed office.
	Well, I'll give Thomas Massey a pass on this stuff.
	But all the rest of them were.
	Yeah, the shoe was not dropping, unfortunately.
	This is why I say I get so disgusted with all this stuff.
	I just thought, well, I don't know.
	I don't know if there's any hope we're ever going to get out of this thing.
	And they got their hooks into us.
	It turns out that, you know, people couldn't hear me.
	People couldn't hear each other.
	But there were a lot of people who understood what was happening.
	They weren't in media. They didn't have a microphone for the most part.
	But they knew what was happening, and gradually they started to surface.
	The same thing may be happening in a pushback against this pandemic treaty, but folks, we don't have a lot of time in this.
	And they're going to run this and use it fraudulently in the same way they used the Paris Climate Treaty fraudulently.
	Anyway, among other people there, you had Dr.
	Michael Yadin, you had Professor Bhakti, Stefan Hockertz, and others, critical voices who spoke out about this.
	And again, it was in German, he used the term, if I'm pronouncing this correctly, Al-Farbeitung.
	And what that means in English is essentially to come to terms with the past, to deal with it.
	Something that became a popular term as they were talking about their Nazi past.
	How do we come to terms with that?
	On Rumble, Sprumford says the COVID thing showed with devastating clarity just how weak and dumb most people are.
	Changed my entire outlook on society.
	Mine too. Mine too.
	And on the alternative media, completely changed my mind on that.
	On Rumble, Corrine Brandy says, how many 5G towers went up in your neighborhood while Trump had you locked down?
	Four were put up here.
	Well, that's true.
	Yeah, he did like that 5G because that's also control.
	That 5G is a necessary substrate that They don't care about the privacy implications.
	Oh, we can't let the Chinese do this because the Chinese will know everything we're doing.
	We'll do it. Oh, then that means you'll know everything that we're doing, right?
	But 5G is a necessary infrastructure for the surveillance police state.
	And they don't care what the health effects are.
	As a matter of fact, if it's got bad health effects and they know it, they probably double down on that part of it as well.
	But even to the extent...
	That they don't have to show that it is safe.
	And if you question its safety, oh, they denounce you as a paranoid conspiracy theorist.
	They even denounce as a paranoid conspiracy the idea that they would use it as surveillance when they talk about how they're going to use it as surveillance.
	Yeah, but Trump was all about that, wasn't he?
	He and his CIA pals.
	We've got to be the ones who are spying on everybody.
	Anyway, he said, Aufarbeitung is the way that Germans deal with their fascist past.
	Well, how do we deal with our fascist future?
	That's the question.
	Because we're about to re-elect one of two fascist leaders, either Biden or Trump.
	And we're about to re-elect fascist congressmen and senators, Democrat and Republican, because they're the only ones that are allowed on the ballot.
	The past will only be dealt with when the causes of what has happened have been removed, he said.
	It is only because these causes still exist that the ties of the past have not been severed.
	Well, they're about to make those bonds, those ties that they have tied us down with, they're about to make them a lot stronger with this treaty that they're working on.
	And so there is no accountability for their failures.
	They will not even be named.
	When you look at this article, Pandemics, a business opportunity.
	Yeah, follow the money. This is also from Brownstone.
	Like I said, Brownstone, Exposé, Daily Skeptic.
	They will ask the questions, but they're very much on the side fringe, like I am.
	They don't get a lot of attention or readership or viewership or anything.
	But the big con media, the big conservative media is just, what did Trump do today?
	What's going on with Biden?
	Did Biden fall down?
	Did he say something stupid? And what about Trump?
	What is the latest legal issue with all of his scandals?
	That's all they want to talk about.
	So imagine that you have an infallible, risk-free business scheme in which you get to create the market, you get to decide what the product is, you get to manage its regulation, and then you have the power to confine people to their homes or remove their income until they submit to buying it.
	Well, that's what we had, isn't it?
	Even to the extent that as this stuff was ramping up in 2020, it was in September or October of 2020, Children's Health Defense looked at this and said, well, they're putting this stuff in polyethylene glycol, PEG. They're going to pegylate it, right? This injection.
	They said, this is going to cause people to go into anaphylactic shock immediately.
	A lot of people are highly allergic, susceptible to this.
	It'll put them in shock. So they called the FDA. The FDA said, well, we don't care.
	Call Pfizer. Pfizer said, we don't care.
	So you have an infallible business that can make no mistake.
	If you harm people, The business and the government and the media will all say, well, that didn't happen.
	Or if you can absolutely prove that it happened, well, that's rare.
	That's rare. That's the only people that it happened to.
	All this is being negotiated with the World Health Organization's pandemic documents to be agreed upon by government in just two months' time.
	And this is your government, regardless of where you live in the world.
	If you're in Australia, you're in the UK, you're in Canada, you're in Europe, America, because this is a global thing.
	And that two-month deadline is global.
	There will be no accountability for what they have done.
	Instead, they are going to build upon that precedent that was set during Trump and Biden.
	And we will re-elect either Trump or Biden because they got away with it.
	Big time, didn't they?
	What is the WHO? I guess you could say, who is the who?
	Well, they get about a quarter of their funding from the pharmaceutical industry and major pharmaceutical investors.
	The largest country-based funders are the U.S. and Germany, and they are also heavily invested in pharma because Germany gave a lot of money to BioNTech, the partner of Pfizer.
	Trump gave a lot of money to Pfizer.
	Germany gave a lot of money to BioNTech, and they put this poison together.
	A lot of your money.
	The WHO does not come under any national legal jurisdiction.
	Think about that.
	There is no controlling legal authority there.
	They're scot-free. They don't even pay taxes.
	Yeah, listen to this. Senior WHO staff have diplomatic immunity as well.
	That's like a little government.
	The organization is highly hierarchical with a military-like structure.
	Isn't that interesting?
	Because so is the CDC. Isn't it interesting that we had medical martial law imposed by the CDC, now in the future it will be imposed by the WHO, two military-like organizations where they get little ranks in military titles and things like that, uniforms. Staff have tax-free salaries.
	No country on earth taxes them.
	Supernatural, national rather, takes on all new meaning, doesn't it?
	They're above any national government already.
	So, they have tax-free salaries and benefits such as education allowance until their children are adults.
	They have health insurance, living allowances.
	They travel business class on longer trips.
	After retiring on a generous pension scheme, former staff commonly supplement this through consultancies arranged by their friends who are still within the organization.
	It's largest office is in Geneva, Switzerland, one of the most expensive cities on earth.
	now the Pandemic agreement and the IHR amendments They're running these two things And it's always they always have plausible deniability about what they're doing. They don't just run it in one direction You see just as you got the MAGA people who are willfully ignorant About Trump's role in 2020. They'll say oh he didn't do it
	It was the governor's and it wasn't even the Republican governor's it was the Democrat governor's I mean they I Mean what an amazing lie that?
	They have bought hook, line, and sinker.
	No, what they did was, and they did this from the very beginning.
	Back in 2001, the first germ game two months before 9-11.
	One week after 9-11, the anthrax false flag attack.
	Two months later, the state legislation, the model legislation that was sent out.
	This was going to be run through the states.
	Because then you got plausible denial.
	I didn't do it. The states did it.
	Well, we did it because...
	The federal government told us that we had to do it.
	And, you know, back and forth, they do this.
	And that kind of game is what the World Health Organization is playing.
	We've got two documents here.
	We've got a pandemic treaty, and then we have the international health regulations, the IHR. Those are two different things.
	And we'll say, well, that's not true.
	That's not in this document.
	And they'll hold up the document that it's not in, but it's in the other document, you see.
	And so they're playing this shell game.
	As soon as you say, well, it does this.
	Oh, no, no. You see, here's this document.
	It doesn't have it. But then it's in the other document.
	They always do that.
	They're designed to work together.
	They have two parallel documents, just like we had two parallel authorities during the lockdown.
	And the knuckle-dragging MAGA cultists can't get their head around that.
	I don't even try to reach out to these people.
	They're too far gone.
	If they can't catch on to this stuff after four years, they ain't ever going to catch on, folks.
	You forget about the Trump followers ever figuring this out.
	They will never listen.
	Don't be one of them.
	It's like banging your head against the wall, trying to reason with these people.
	Explain to them the history and the actuality of what happened.
	They don't want to hear it, and they won't listen to it.
	They're dead set against that.
	Anyway, so they got two parallel documents.
	It allows the WHO Director General to repeatedly claim the pandemic agreement doesn't hand any power to the WHO. And anybody who says so is a liar and a conspiracy theorist.
	And so the clauses that they say don't exist in the pandemic agreement do exist.
	They just put them in the other document.
	They put them in the proposed IHR amendments.
	That's the game they play. COVID-19 was rarely fatal beyond the elderly, if then.
	CDC showed that COVID vaccines were less effective than natural immunity, but this didn't stop the WHO from running the COVAX campaign to vaccinate 75% of Africans, and the knowledge that 50% of the population was under 20 years of age, and less than 1% of the population was over 75.
	So they create a narrative about a pandemic.
	And which groups are at risk and all this other.
	And then they completely ignore that.
	Because they know it was a lie.
	And we knew it was a lie.
	CEPI. C-E-P-I. A key player running the rushed vaccine effort is a public-private partnership.
	That's why we have global governance, folks.
	And it is here now.
	And it is a public-private partnership.
	And part of this is the WHO and CEPI and things like that.
	Like I mentioned, the WHO is not subject to taxes of any nation-state, so they are above all these nation-states.
	Global governance as a public-private partnership, a fascist government, a merger of corporations and governments.
	And so, it's a public-private partnership set up by the World Economic Forum, set up CEPI, funded by Bill and Melinda Gates.
	As I said, the World Economic Forum, you have the UN, they create, you know, agreements and, you know, agendas and things like that.
	The World Economic Forum is there.
	To kind of shepherd it through like an executive branch and to get the funding since they don't yet have a global tax like a carbon tax or like a pandemic permission tax or something like that.
	They have to get the money now from the corporations.
	That's where the stakeholders come in.
	So they set up this partnership in 2017, the World Economic Forum and Bill and Melinda Gates.
	And then the Welcome Trust and then a few countries put this all together.
	Created CEPI. It's funded very much like the World Health Organization itself.
	Money in large amounts helps those who don't care at all about right or truth.
	It helps them to rise to the top despite the obvious unfitness.
	It allows the media to survive if they please these sponsors.
	Do you think that Fox News and CNN or MSNBC or any of these people who thrive on pharmaceutical money, do you think that any of them are going to talk about this pandemic treaty?
	Absolutely not.
	They would be coming after their own sponsors.
	During COVID-19, the industry pushing the new World Health Organization initiatives.
	Made an unprecedented amount of money, so the pandemic agenda has a lot of momentum, and these people want to keep making that money.
	You know, they have maybe bought some new mansions, and they've, I don't know if they've got any mortgages on them, or they just pay cash.
	Bezos just bought his third mansion in Florida.
	This one was $90 million.
	I don't know how much the other ones were.
	For most of the rest of humanity, those not heavily invested in pharma, Or in software, anybody who might be concerned about human rights, the future does not look so rosy.
	We're supposed to provide the money that ends up in the hands of the people who are running it all.
	And that is how profiteering works.
	So we'll have to put things right because they obviously will not.
	Now that is all written out for us in the WHO documents.
	And we are aware of the money transfers of the past few years.
	We no longer have an excuse to ignore it, says the Brownstone Institute.
	Like I said, some of their stuff they might get into giving excuses for Trump, but they do understand what's going on with this part of it.
	The German government documents obtained from a court order reveal COVID crisis political manipulation.
	Which we all knew, but now they're getting documents for it.
	It's kind of like the fact that we knew how the censorship was being run through social media corporations.
	We knew they were doing it on behalf of the government, but then eventually we did get some of the documents put out showing the messages going back and forth where they were telling them what to do.
	And the nice thing about that was it destroyed their plausible deniability.
	But again, notice how they do it.
	You know, Trump... Releases the money, and of course this is a plan for 20 years, going back to when the CIA put it all together under George W. Bush.
	We will issue the orders, and we'll send you the money, and you will implement it.
	And then when they come to censorship, we will tell you who to censor.
	We'll give you legal immunity and actually we'll give you the money to start your social media companies because we'll put people on the venture capital boards as they did in the late 1990s from the intelligence community.
	We will get you started.
	You guys are going to have to compete amongst yourselves.
	And then whoever wins with this stuff, we're going to give you legal cover and we're going to tell you who to censor for us.
	But hey, we're not doing the censorship.
	I mean, it's like, you know, if caught or captured, we will deny any knowledge of the impossible mission force.
	The release of heavily redacted German government documents obtained under court order by the German Alternative Media magazine.
	Say it's Alternative Media. This one is called Multipolar.
	It's shaking up German politics on the eve of the critical 2024 European Parliament election in Germany, scheduled to be held 9th of June, 2024.
	I guess they're going to have to rest and censor some more AFD people.
	That's always their response, right?
	But here in America, Americans don't care.
	We're so focused already on the personalities and the partisan loyalty to one party or the other.
	We don't really care. You know, who do you love the most or who do you hate the least, right?
	We don't care which one of these disgusting tyrants gets to do a repeat.
	Oh, well, they're better than that other guy.
	That's what you hear from everybody on both sides, isn't it?
	Well, I think we can do better, but we're not going to do better in Washington, certainly not this time around.
	We're going to have to do better by doing better at the local level if we can.
	Despite extensive redactions, in other words, censorship, and the currently released documents, one key fact which has been revealed is that politicians in Germany overrode the RKI scientists.
	This is a foundation that's there to...
	To do the science to second-guess what their policies are.
	And so the politicians overrode the scientists and the physicians to enact mandated, counterproductive public health policies.
	The identities of these politicians in these documents that were obtained by this alternative media, the identity of the politicians was redacted.
	But they may reside within this German government, or they may be from the Superior European Union, which can and often does overrule the semi-autonomous German government.
	There is evidence indicating collusion to implement totalitarian policies.
	What kind of policies would those be?
	Well, those would be the kinds of totalitarian policies that Trump implemented by himself.
	Lockdowns. Then vaccine, passport, green card systems, legalist restrictions, and so forth.
	All-cause mortality data indicate that the EU nations, which did not fully comply with these arbitrary, capricious policies such as Sweden and Romania, because in Romania they know about vampires.
	They didn't fall for this kind of attack.
	As a matter of fact, I thought it was really one of the funniest things about this was that Romanian government tried to use Dracula to sell the vaccines.
	They've got to get their propaganda game up.
	They need some help from the CIA, don't they?
	Well, Romania and Sweden had the best COVID outcomes, raising questions of the political consequences for those governments that aggressively complied with EU and WHO-promoted totalitarian policies.
	Just like Trump and Biden did.
	Trump and Biden promoted the totalitarian policies aggressively and in lockstep with these other organizations.
	But no consequences for them.
	So, who knows?
	Maybe they'll get away scot-free.
	We've seen it over and over again, haven't we?
	Well, not surprisingly, German corporate media is currently attempting to smear Multipolar, the alternative company, a media outlet that got these documents.
	So the response is to smear them.
	Linking the publication of the founders to putative but undocumented Russian influence campaign.
	This is why it's good to have an enemy.
	That's why a totalitarian government always has to have a foreign enemy as well.
	Yeah, just like in 1984.
	The multipolar editorial published below for the first time in machine-translated English provides a succinct summary of relevant events today.
	I'm not going to go into that.
	But they said it will behoove voters from throughout Europe, the U.S., and the Five Eyes Alliance Nations.
	Why did they mention that? Well, because this is all being run through the intelligence communities.
	And the Five Eyes are the CIA and the MI5 or 6 or whichever one it is in the UK. But it's the US, the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand.
	The Five Eyes.
	It's just got this Lord of the Rings feels to it, doesn't it?
	And of course, Palantir obviously quotes that as well.
	Those concerned with personal and national sovereignty and with a creeping techno-totalitarianism, which characterizes current times, Can learn a lot from what happened in Germany, as well as the reaction of the German people to learning the details of how these arbitrary and capricious actions were imposed upon them.
	So, yeah, we should learn something, but the question is, will we?
	Will we do anything at all about this?
	Or will we allow them to solidify these gains and build upon them?
	Why won't the government tell us what the World Health Organization wants us to sign up to?
	This is the Daily Skeptic out of the UK. And they're saying, what's the matter with the UK government?
	They don't want to talk about this thing?
	This is a major treaty.
	And they just want to quietly keep it under the carpet, except for about five members of Parliament, they do.
	The media and the government in the UK. And it's not even talked about by five members of Congress here in the United States.
	And by none of the mainstream media, very few of the alternative media.
	If you're expected to agree to an employment contract, would you not want to read it before you sign it?
	When you go to a restaurant, do you look at the menu before ordering your food or you just eat whatever you happen to be given by the waiter?
	When you buy a house or a car, would you like to look at it first?
	Would you like to find out some details about it before you commit to the purchase?
	In these situations, it is highly unlikely that you would simply trust that everything will just turn out fine with no essential information to inform your decision-making.
	Yet, this is exactly what All of our governments are doing with this thing.
	It's going to cost us a lot of money.
	They've got big payoffs written into this stuff for themselves.
	But it's going to cost us our freedom and our dignity.
	And maybe our very lives.
	This is what the government would like you to do with the World Health Organization.
	And it's opaque. IHR, International Health Regulations Amendments.
	In fact, it's even worse than that.
	But of course, hasn't that been standard procedure for Congress?
	Didn't we just do that with our new, you know, proudly Christian Speaker of the House, Johnson?
	You know, this guy was, he just did a complete 180 on everything that he was about.
	And he comes in and he does the Pelosi rules.
	Well, here you go. We've got less than 24 hours.
	You've got to read this 1,000 plus, 1,500 plus page.
	You've got to pass it by tomorrow.
	No time to read it. Just sign it.
	Turn it in. Still playing that game.
	And the garbage that is in there.
	The British public will not get a say in whether or not our nation has signed up to the changed agreements.
	Neither will the American public or the German public or any other country.
	The government and the World Health Organization will decide for you.
	It is therefore incredibly important that we all become aware of the issues around this debate and then consider expressing any resulting concerns we might have.
	Most people would take this approach to any other situation which could dramatically affect the way they live their life, that could impact their family, and their future.
	But these IHRs are being hidden from public scrutiny.
	You'll be forgiven for not knowing about the World Health Organization's IHR amendments because there is scant coverage of what they are within the mainstream media, therefore very little public discussion about them.
	In summary, the World Health Organization is currently developing two international legal instruments intended to increase significantly its authority in managing public health emergencies.
	The amendments to the international health regulations and then the pandemic treaty itself are James Oguski was way ahead of everybody on this.
	And when he called me, he says, I've been shipping this around to everybody.
	He said, nobody, even an alternative media wants to talk about this.
	What's going on? Been given a cold shoulder by everybody.
	He's now been able to get this out.
	In limited ways. But nobody has focused on this earlier or in more depth than James Roguski.
	There is strong evidence that the process has not been lawfully adhered to.
	The World Health Organization failed to publish the revised package of IHR amendments back in January 2024.
	This is perhaps our way of getting into this.
	Because these people are just going to rubber stamp it and rush it through.
	So maybe what we can do...
	Is what they're talking about here.
	There's strong evidence that they did not follow the procedure to do this.
	They were supposed to publish this back in January of 2024 as required under Article 55 of the IHR. That means that the World Health Organization cannot now lawfully present the IHR for a vote within the time frame required under international law.
	The May deadline for the vote must therefore be extended.
	And you would expect that something as important as this would be raised in Parliament.
	And widely reported in the press.
	But it has not been.
	Why? Well, because they're all in on it.
	Just like they were all in on 2020.
	Negotiators on the IHR are continuing with the ninth and final round of negotiations between countries from March the 18th until March the 28th.
	Parliament and the British public are not being given full details of the IHR amendments.
	we're not being given any details of it.
	They are being hidden from the public in the parliamentary scrutiny.
	It is therefore impossible to know the full impact that the IHRs will have on our nation, our democracy, our autonomous decision-making.
	However, what little we do know is alarming enough to have caused MPs and other credible voices to have raised grave concern.
	Last year, one MP, Esther McVeigh, and five other conservative MPs, wrote a letter to ministers to warn of a, quote, ambition that is evident for the WHO to transition from an advisory organization to a controlling international authority.
	That's what James Roguski was pointing out.
	He said, always in the past, they've been an advisory body.
	That's what they were created to do.
	Now they got busy writing these rules and changing the rule, amendments to the rules, and creating a treaty and all this other kind of stuff so they can turn themselves into a controlling organization.
	They don't want to be an advisory organization.
	You know, add on to the CDC and other national bureaucracies.
	They want to be the bureaucracy, and they want to make this legally binding.
	That's the point of this deception.
	The group raised several serious questions, these five MPs.
	Actually, six, I guess, when you count Esther.
	They raised serious concerns about the proposed amendments to the IHRs, warning that the World Health Organization's advice would be binding...
	And would introduce new requirement for countries to recognize the WHO as the global authority on public health measures.
	If passed in May, this coming May, two months from now, the change would mean that the World Health Organization could enforce border closures, guarantee measures, and vaccine passports on all member countries, including the UK and the U.S., Additionally, the draft of the treaty itself would commit member states to significant spending commitments.
	This is where they get paid off for pandemic preparedness.
	Surely, this is worth some level of public and parliamentary debate.
	A group of conservative MPs in the UK is warned of the risks of signing away their powers to unelected WHO bosses.
	Just remember that Tedros doesn't have a background in anything medical or pharmaceutical or anything like that.
	The guy who's head of the World Health Organization, his entire career has been as a politician, a Marxist politician.
	So... Several members of the all-party parliamentary group on pandemic response and recovery have argued that the treaty risks, quote, undermining UK sovereignty.
	That's the whole point of it.
	And they're warning people about it in the UK. We don't have anybody even looking at it here.
	You got Jim Jordan who's posing for the cameras.
	These people are such clowns.
	And you got Johnson who just wants a rubber stamp.
	Every war, everywhere.
	March 30, 2024, Esther McVeigh wrote in The Telegraph and said, Protecting our ability to make all of our own domestic decisions on national public health measures,
	including whether to introduce any lockdowns or restrictions, require vaccinations and mask wearing, and decisions on travel into and out of the country.
	Well, here's the deal.
	You know, you got your red line, you say, well, you know, if the WHO comes out and says this, we're not going to do it.
	The WHO has revealed what they are.
	They have revealed what they are.
	They're corrupt. They seek to have global control over our governments and our citizens, over our health care, to take away our own decisions, our informed consent, our doctor-patient relationship, all of it.
	This is Fauci turned into a massive global bureaucracy.
	They can blackmail and control any government.
	Why would we say, well, okay, why would we even stop At saying we're not going to do the treaty or these rules or whatever.
	The World Health Organization must be destroyed.
	It must be destroyed.
	This thing is a dangerous parasite.
	It must be destroyed. It must be defunded.
	But nobody's talking about that.
	You see how bad this situation is?
	We've got politicians who not only are not talking about this because they're with them, And we have media that's not talking about it because they're with them.
	They get paid off by the pharmaceutical industry.
	But nobody's even acknowledging how evil this is.
	They continue to give them money to play their games.
	And if they don't do it in May, they'll do it at some other time.
	They must be destroyed.
	Carthage must be destroyed, said Cato.
	And eventually they did.
	But we've got to sound that alarm.
	And folks, again, when you look at all this stuff, how do you handle this?
	I know we feel powerless when we look at all of this stuff.
	But we're not powerless at all.
	Not at all. We have the ability to block this if we have good people at the local level.
	That may or may not work.
	But regardless of what happens, just as we said over this last week, and all this stuff back and forth, Trump making a joke out of the Christian religion with his MAGA church and his Trump Bible and all the rest of this stuff, this grifting TV evangelist Trump, and then you've got the atheist Democrats represented by Biden, Trying to, let's remove Jesus and even the Easter Bunny.
	Let's put in furries and trannies.
	We look at all this stuff.
	They don't have the power to impact your relationship with God.
	Who can stop that?
	Nobody. Nobody can stop that.
	And so we need to pray about this stuff.
	When you think about this, pray about this.
	Focus on that. That can make a difference.
	You know, instead of signing petitions, everybody wants to get everybody together and sign a petition.
	And RFK Jr. is talking about pardoning Ed Snowden.
	He says, I'm going to put out a petition.
	We want to get 300,000 signatures on it.
	Well, we need to petition God Almighty.
	And we need to petition him, get 300,000 people praying about this kind of stuff and shut this down.
	That actually does work.
	Petitions to our corrupt government don't work.
	But many times we have seen petitions to our kind and benevolent God work.
	We'll be right back. You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APS radio.com Just a small town boy drinking genetically more than fights or This ensures he doesn't procreate Please stop Stop the reading.
	We're almost 9 billion people, please stop believing right now.
	We're almost 9 billion people, please stop believing right now.
	We're almost 9 billion people, please stop believing right now.
	We're almost 9 billion people, please stop believing right now.
	We're almost 9 billion people, please stop believing right now.
	We're almost 9 billion people, please stop believing right now.
	We're almost 9 billion people, please stop believing right now.
	We're almost 9 billion people, please stop believing right now.
	We're almost 9 billion people, please stop believing right now.
	We're almost 9 billion people, please stop believing right now.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	you On Rumble, a couple of questions.
	Junk Silver, we have always been at war with East Russia.
	Yeah. And West Russia as well, I guess.
	I don't know. It is Orwellian, isn't it?
	And on Rockfin, Glenn Bedingfield says, Mr.
	Dave, who are you supporting for president in the 2024 race?
	I'm looking at my local sheriff and my local mayor because both Trump and Biden, and I would even include RFK Jr.
	in this, even though he pushed back more than they did on this stuff.
	There's some real troubling...
	Inconsistencies in his past.
	You look at his vice presidential pick, radical, liberal.
	I'm sorry, I'm not voting for any of these people.
	I'm done with that stuff.
	I'm not voting. I have absolutely no confidence in any of the people who are running for president.
	I didn't during the primaries.
	I didn't support anybody.
	And I'm not supporting any of these people.
	Personally, I didn't vote in 2020 for the first time in my life.
	And I'm not voting unless I've got some strong local candidates to support, and I do here in Tennessee.
	I'll vote for the local candidates, and then I'm going to put some kind of a write-in or none of the above or whatever just to make sure that somebody else doesn't get to cast a vote for who they will.
	I'm going to fill out something so that I'll do a write-in even if they don't count it.
	So they can't cast a vote for Trump or Biden.
	I'm not voting for either one of these people.
	And the point of me attacking Trump and Biden is to get you to focus on local politics.
	All politics is local.
	Always has been. Democrats always said that.
	You always had the globalists always say, think globally, act locally.
	We better start doing that because they do that.
	They can come in. You can have Soros spend millions of dollars.
	To get a local district attorney elected in a city so they can destroy the city like they have in San Francisco or LA and other places like that.
	They understand.
	And Elon Musk said this about Soros.
	He said, that's really a genius plan when you stop and think about it.
	Because you have absolutely no leverage as to who gets elected president.
	Nobody needs to get mad at me because I'm not going to vote for Trump or Biden.
	Because my vote isn't going to make any difference and neither is yours when it comes to that.
	Your money is not going to make any difference in that.
	But your money and your vote could make a difference at a local election.
	And that's what Elon Musk said about George Soros.
	These are smart guys. You should listen to them.
	They know how government works.
	That's how they got so much money.
	They use their knowledge of how government works to get government to pay them to do certain things.
	And so both Elon Musk and George Soros know how government works.
	And they know that they can get the most leverage to affect the most change at the local level.
	Everybody says it. Nobody believes me when I say it.
	So believe Elon Musk.
	Believe George Soros.
	They know how the system works.
	I spent for years...
	I worked with the Libertarian Party.
	What would they tell us to do? Well, you got to get X number of votes for president or for governor in order to stay on the ballot.
	And so we would, you know, spend all this effort to try to get on the ballot and signatures and everything.
	We'd spend all this effort trying to get some votes for governor or whatever.
	And it was a useless task.
	Should have just ignored all of that.
	Should have run candidates as independents or run them on Democrat and Republican tickets and support them as a group underground.
	We don't need to carry the Libertarian flag or the Libertarian label.
	We should have done a guerrilla thing at the local level, putting people on.
	If it's a Democrat, if you want to get somebody elected, it's a Democrat district or Republican district you run, whoever is in charge of that district.
	Now, if they've skewed this and they do skew it with their, the way they gerrymander, this has always been there.
	They pick the voters.
	And it's very precise science now with computers.
	They can just jump from one side of the street to the other looking at people's voter registration to pack these districts up.
	And so, you know, you just, if it's, you know, whichever party that district is, if you want to get somebody locally elected, have them run as that.
	And then support them.
	And your money and your vote's going to go way, way, way further in that local election than it ever will.
	At the state level, at the federal level, and certainly at the presidential level.
	Let's talk about what's going on in California.
	California's $20 fast food minimum wage just hit.
	They put this thing through a couple of years ago, but just went into effect on Monday.
	And April fools.
	They fool people about minimum wage.
	This is another thing. People are like, oh, let's put ourselves a raise.
	Well, what they got were higher prices and people getting laid off.
	Because if you don't raise the prices or you don't go with fewer people, you're going to go out of business.
	And they'll lose their jobs anyway.
	This is the reality.
	But there's more to it than this.
	Because when we look at what is happening in the fast food industry, and it's interesting to me that they focused on the fast food industry.
	Being a conspiracy theorist as I am, always questioning the motives of these politicians, I have a strong inclination that the purpose of grabbing nuisance in California is to, he wanted to pressure national chains.
	And so it's only the national chains that have to go up to the $20 an hour.
	Doesn't apply to sit down restaurants and things like that yet.
	But who are the people who are going to be the first ones to automate with robots to replace workers?
	It's going to be those same national chains.
	And of course, they've got to have 60 restaurants for this to apply to them.
	They don't have to own, personally own all 60 of them, because when we look at the franchisees, there's not really that many franchisees that have 60 different units.
	But if you put the pressure, let's say, on McDonald's or something, and you make them raise their minimum wage to 20, McDonald's as a corporation might look at this and say, all right, let's come up with some robots that can do this or do that to replace humans, and then we will give this, you know, tell the franchisees, that's the way you've got to do it.
	And it'll roll it out that way.
	So even if you're a franchisee that's got five or six stores, they're going to treat you as part of the national chain because the pressure is to get the national chains to buy automation equipment to replace the workers.
	Because why? Well, because Newsom is a whore.
	For Silicon Valley, among other interests that he's whoring for.
	So I think that's what's really behind this, frankly.
	But looking at just what happened on the first day, some of the chains increased their cost by a couple of dollars.
	It was at Burger King, and it was a Whopper of a jump in price.
	A Texas double Whopper that cost $15.09 on March the 29th, but then surged to $16.89 on April 1st.
	I don't know about you guys, but around here, there's a lot of mom-and-pop places where you can eat around $10 or $11 in like a sit-down restaurant.
	Why would anybody go to Burger King and pay $16?
	$17 for a hamburger.
	And then their big fish meal.
	Big fish meal.
	That sounds appetizing, doesn't it?
	Jumped from $7.49 to $11.49 afterwards.
	An increase of $4 or actually an increase of almost 50%, more than 50%.
	That's pretty amazing. I can't believe it.
	I mean, it's costing that much to go to Burger King?
	Other restaurants that were checked by the New York Post show no change, including Chick-fil-A, Wendy's, and McDonald's.
	One McDonald's franchisee, though, says that he's had no choice but to raise prices already.
	So what they did was they looked at what are the prices on Friday versus on Monday.
	He says, as a business owner, when you're dealing with this kind of extraordinary increase, overnight change, you know that a 25% increase in wages, you've got to leave no stone unturned if you're going to stay in business.
	He's got 18 restaurants in Northern California.
	So that's a really big business with a lot of revenue if you've got 18 McDonald's.
	But again, you know, they treat him with the same rules because he's part of the national chain that has more than 60 stores nationally.
	In the last three months, what he did was he raised prices between 5% and 7% in anticipation of this law going into effect.
	And so they've been gradually raising prices at some of these other places for some time.
	The previous minimum wage was $16 an hour.
	Now it is $20 an hour, a 25% increase.
	It's not just increases.
	You know, whenever you have minimum wage increase, nobody gets wealthier.
	You have inflation and you have unemployment, which is what it causes.
	And so, mass layoffs are beginning at some of the fast food changes already.
	California called this the Fast Recovery Act.
	And they put it into law in 2022.
	Requires a particular set of food chains dealing with certain kinds of products outlined in the law to raise their minimum wages.
	And there was a lot of talk about the fact that they, after they put this through, Panera Bread would have qualified and would have had to raise their wages by 25%.
	So they put a special rider in there for Panera.
	If they bake bread, I wonder who we could be talking about.
	If they bake bread and they sell it in a particular way, they're exempt from this.
	And of course, the owner, CEO of Panera, the chain, It was a big supporter of Governor Nuisance.
	And so they got their payoff that way.
	There's no better investment that you can make in terms of return on investment than a politician.
	They'll always pay you off with loopholes and with other people's money, but they will pay you off many, many, many times.
	Thousands of percent return on investment.
	The combined number of locations, regardless of who owns them, must be higher than 60.
	So mass layoffs are now guaranteed with many restaurants already firing thousands of workers, as well as some chains closing multiple locations.
	Getting out of California.
	Restaurants are struggling to stay above water.
	And Democrats just threw them an anvil.
	California Assembly Republican leader.
	We warned the Democrats this new mandate would cost jobs.
	ignored us, and here we are with the highest unemployment rate in the country and is poised to get even worse.
	The digital options that many fast food franchises are referring to are automated ordering systems, as well as robot workers, which are slowly but surely becoming more cost-effective than human laborers.
	At least one fast food location in California is testing a fully robotic restaurant with no human workers.
	Who's going to buy their product when all the workers are robots?
	Oh, well, we will because we'll be given universal basic income, which is what the stimulus checks that Trump began training us on in 2020.
	They don't want anybody working.
	And again, this is a sellout, I think, first and foremost, not just to the immediate obvious recipients of this, you know, the labor unions that supposedly are representing the best interest of the workers, and they're not. But beyond that, I think that this is the big issue here.
	Because why would you focus on these fast food chains?
	They're the ones that are going to be the first ones to automate with robots.
	And so let's give them a nudge.
	Let's incentivize this by making humans even more expensive.
	Because that's the way you do it, right?
	They look at this and say, well, I don't know.
	If I can buy somebody's time and I can get them to work for this, how long would it take me to have a payoff for this robot replacement?
	Well, they just changed that calculation by a big factor, thereby raising the price of the humans by 25%.
	Some chains are reported that they'll be forced to cut working crews in half, meaning those who are working will be paid $4 an hour more, but they will work twice as hard per shift.
	The probable end result in the next five years will be the majority of chain restaurants operating with a tiny crew of humans working alongside robots.
	That's why they did this, folks, I think.
	I really do believe that's why they did it.
	And then you have Bill Gates.
	Bill Gates is pushing educational courses.
	He's involved himself in education for quite some time.
	He and his family have always been big supporters of Planned Parenthood.
	If they can't abort...
	People in the human race.
	What they'll do is they'll abort their future.
	They'll abort their education.
	So let's get involved in educational foundations.
	The Gates family.
	And so he's got a foundation that is providing school lessons for math.
	And they will teach that math is white supremacy.
	And they'll teach it in the math lessons.
	There's a little picture there. A typewriter says 2 plus 2 equals racist.
	They said that white supremacy creates systemic barriers to equity for black, Latinx, and multilingual students.
	And the solution is to have anti-racist math education.
	When they talk about anti-racist and things like that, we're talking about struggle sessions.
	We're talking about Marxism here.
	Again, it's not enough to tolerate something or to be non-discriminating.
	Oh, you must denounce yourself.
	You must denounce yourself and your privilege and all the rest of this stuff.
	This is struggle session stuff straight out of Mao and Stalin's Russia and Mao's China.
	And this is what Bill Gates is trying to bring about.
	Isn't it interesting? Can you think of anybody that is more of an icon for white supremacy than Bill Gates?
	Born with a silver spoon in his mouth, born into a family, all lawyered up, and that's how he stole his fortune.
	He stole it. Bill Gates doesn't need to know math.
	He doesn't need to know programming.
	He steals what he wants.
	That's what he did. He stole the operating system that he used, the DOS. He stole it directly from digital research.
	I remember at that time, I was very much into building home computers as a hobby and stuff like that.
	And he literally went in and stole, at that point in time, before everybody had standardized computers, Around the architecture that was put out there by IBM using the Intel processors and stuff.
	They had Intel processors.
	They had Zilog, had a Z80 that used the same instruction set.
	And they had the operating system that everybody was using.
	They had a standard for the boards that would be the memory boards and other things.
	That was an S100 bus.
	So it was a hardware standard.
	And then they had a software standard for the operating system that was based on CPM by Digital Research.
	And he stole that.
	IBM wanted to use that for their IBM PCs, and the guy who had digital research gave them a price.
	They thought that was too high, so they went to Bill Gates, and he stole it.
	They operated off a command-line interpreter, and he had the same exact syntax?
	He even called the basic input-output system that was underneath it, the BIOS, right?
	He even used the same term, BIOS. He used the same syntax.
	He used the same terminology.
	He didn't change anything.
	He absolutely copied it.
	And, of course, the other guy sued.
	But because the Gates family was all lawyered up, he won.
	And then became a multi-billionaire.
	Not by innovation, but by intellectual theft.
	And then he did the same thing with windows.
	But still couldn't get it right.
	And so, Bill Gates is the ultimate in white privilege and white supremacy.
	The ultimate.
	This is so cynical.
	This is like the royal family complaining about white supremacy or privilege or something.
	And he has never, ever been about excellence.
	Just take a look at the search function on a Windows system.
	Decades later, they still don't have it right.
	A pathway to equitable math instruction is the lesson set that they're putting out.
	They describe it this way.
	The pathway offers guidance and resources for educators to use now as they plan their curriculum, while also offering opportunities for ongoing self-reflection as they seek to develop an anti-racist math practice.
	It's not enough to not be racist.
	You must be anti-racist.
	You must denounce yourself.
	And your unconscious bias and all the rest of this stuff.
	Oh, you may not actually hate people with different skin colors, but subconsciously you do.
	You do. So denounce yourself, citizen, straight out of the Marxist revolutions, because that's what this is.
	The Toolkit Strides, is what they call the modules, serve as multiple on-ramps for educators as they navigate the individual and the collective journey from equity to anti-racism.
	So let's have our math struggle sessions from Bill Gates.
	The Bill Gates and Melinda, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is the only donor, Listed on a website for a group dedicated to eliminating racism from the nation's math curriculum.
	There is no race, racism in math.
	They attack math as being racist because math is the essence of objectivity.
	There is only one answer.
	There's only one right answer in math.
	And that's...
	I really like that because when I was even in school at USF, we had Marxist professors and the core curriculum, things like that.
	And it's like, you guys are just living in la-la.
	I mean, it wasn't nearly as bad as it is now, but you guys are just living in la-la land.
	You know, we've got, you know, if we can describe this stuff by math and we can model it with math, that's truth in the physical world.
	And you guys can go pound sand.
	I don't care what you Marxists are saying.
	We're going to transcend you.
	But now they want to try to take down math.
	They want to deliberately dumb us down, which is what Charlotte Disabue was saying about the Department of Education.
	Even before Bill Gates.
	It is a deliberate dumbing down.
	Who's going to build the bridges when nobody knows how to do any math, right?
	They'll select the engineers based on their skin color or DEI or whatever, but they don't have to know math.
	And listen to what they do.
	Condemned in the lessons...
	It's a focus that insists that students get the right answer.
	You don't need to get the right answer.
	There isn't even any right answer.
	This is your truth. This is your math.
	The answer is whatever you want it to be.
	We're all above average, aren't we?
	There is no right answer, and we do not want students to show their work.
	Well, what difference, if you don't have a right answer, what difference is it about showing your work?
	By the way, that was, when I was in engineering, you get a zero if you got the right answer if you didn't show your work.
	Anybody can look over and get the bottom line number and write it down.
	You got to show your work.
	You got to show you know how to get there.
	And, you know, they just threw it out if you didn't show your work.
	But you know, Bill Gates is the kind of guy that sits in the row next...
	He looks over your shoulder and he gets the number and he becomes a billionaire because he stole that information.
	So he wants to propagate that ethic, I guess.
	They perpetuate educational harm on black, Latinx, and multilingual students, denying them full access to the world of mathematics.
	That's what they're saying about white supremacy, but that's actually what Bill Gates is doing.
	He's actually denying these students...
	The opportunity to buckle down, to learn something, to get it right, to be able to succeed and build things, to accomplish things.
	He's taking all that away.
	They want to take it away from everybody.
	They're not there to help the black and Latinx and everything.
	They want to destroy their lives as well.
	They want them dumbed down and stupid just like everybody else.
	They don't want anybody doing anything.
	Subtopics include ethnomathematics.
	One little, two little, three little Indians.
	What is that about?
	Thoughtful scaffolding.
	And reclaiming their mathematical ancestry.
	Well, my ancestry is two plus two equals four.
	That's it. There's no other answer for that.
	And this just blows my mind.
	Blows my mind that they would come after math this way.
	Also important is to use math as resistance.
	This is math as political revolution.
	And it is the 2 plus 2 equals 5.
	Students of color need to disrupt the disproportionate push-out of people of color in math and STEM fields.
	Well, the way you do that is you teach them how to do math.
	And they've been messing with that for a long time.
	As a matter of fact, you know, I never liked math when I was in high school.
	And I had to catch up.
	I just skipped. People say, how did you graduate math?
	High school without taking trig and other things like that.
	So when I was getting ready to go into engineering, I had to do some remedial stuff real fast.
	And part of the stuff that I really hated about it was the new math where it was proofs and other things like that.
	I wanted word problems. I wanted practical stuff.
	And I went to a lot of used bookstores and I found the math textbook from the Naval Academy in the 1940s.
	And that was the thing that got me through.
	Because they focused on real stuff.
	You know, they used trig to calculate ranges and do navigation.
	It even went into spherical trig.
	It went way beyond what these people were doing.
	And they were all word problems.
	And, you know, instead of the proofs.
	But this is...
	They want to keep people gaslit in ignorance.
	They want to mutilate our bodies.
	They want to keep our spirits in darkness.
	They're coming after the mind, the body, the soul of our children.
	Get your kids away from these people.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, I'm going to talk about, you know, from time to time, we see these articles about kids who are, who live their life the way most of us did when I was a child.
	You know, when I was a child, the children would go around and we'd ride our bikes for long periods of time, go wherever we wanted to go.
	Free-range kids, they call them now.
	They call Child Protective Services on them.
	And so we're going to take a look at that, and we're going to take a look at the DARE program.
	Remember that? From the 1990s and late 80s?
	Putting the police in the schools to lecture them about not doing drugs.
	A guy has done a book about that now, and it's kind of interesting.
	So we're going to talk about that when we come back.
	On Rumble, Junk Silver, thank you for the tip.
	He said, anybody else want to chip in today so David can buy a Trump Bible?
	Thank you. Yeah, I could use the tip, but I couldn't use the Trump Bible.
	I've got plenty of Bibles, a lot of different translations.
	You know, they don't have Lee Greenwood's song in them for some reason.
	I don't know why that was ever left out of any Bible.
	How do we ever get through without having Lee Greenwood's songs in there or the Pledge of Allegiance?
	Rumble, conservative thinker, thank you very much for the tip.
	He says, hey Dave, I'm catching up on yesterday's show.
	By my math...
	That means I'm still getting my news at least a month ahead of the average news consumer.
	Well, thank you. That's a kind comment.
	But, yeah, make sure you do the right kind of math, not by the Bill Gates kind of math.
	We'll be right back. Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
	From country to blues, classic hits to news, APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
	Get details at APSradio.com.
	♪♪♪
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, we have parents investigated for letting a seven-year-old get a cookie from a store.
	That's how this all began.
	The seven-year-old is a homeschooling family.
	And they treat their children like human beings.
	And so the seven-year-old was there with siblings who were 13, 11, and 9.
	The fourth child, the youngest child, was seven.
	Back in 2018, the family that lives in the suburbs of Atlanta, Georgia.
	It's not actually part of Atlanta.
	It's called Canton.
	She homeschools them.
	Her husband works at home telecommuting.
	Well, they were part of a swim team at a local YMCA. And it was about two blocks from their house.
	After swim practice one day, the seven-year-old lagged a little bit behind while the rest of them walked home.
	He stopped by the grocery store for a free cookie.
	But this is not Norman Rockwell's America anymore.
	A store employee thought this was very unusual and called 9-11.
	We got a seven-year-old here who knows what he's doing, and he's by himself.
	Then instead of letting him leave, the employee told him he had to wait for the police to arrive.
	Evidently, he's seven years old, so he doesn't know to run when you hear something like that.
	You better wait for the police.
	Why? I didn't steal anything.
	Anyway, his semi-independence attracted the police attention to no fewer than three occasions, which led to two investigations by CPS. The mom recently had the opportunity to share these experiences with the governor's office in Georgia.
	That meeting was arranged by the Reason Foundation, which publishes Reason Magazine, Reason.com, and a non-profit called Let Grow.
	Which is about leaving kids alone, letting them do the types of things that people did 50, 60 years ago.
	She hoped that her story would inspire support for a reasonable childhood independence law in Georgia.
	Such laws establish that neglect occurs when parents put kids in obvious, serious danger, but not any time they let their kids out of their sight.
	Letting the kids out of your sight does not put them in danger.
	You know, by definition.
	That's what these people are saying.
	When Jackson refused to tell the authorities where he lived, he had been told not to give that kind of information to strangers.
	The police deduced that he had been swimming and they went to the YMCA to learn more.
	They were very angry with Jackson and informed him that being out and about without his parents was a serious infraction.
	He responded, I will go home right away if you'll just leave me alone.
	Ha! After the police finally brought him home, they informed his family and his father, Glenn, that it wasn't safe to let a child his age wander around outside, a couple of blocks away.
	You can't just raise kids like that anymore.
	It isn't safe, said the cops.
	The father begged to differ.
	He recited statistics that kids today face no greater risk from stranger danger than previous generations.
	Nevertheless, the police summoned Child Protective Services.
	I've seen this from family members who would watch the nightly news in the 70s and 80s.
	And of course, what is the purpose of the nightliness?
	Well, they give you sports, and they give you weather, and then they have, if it bleeds, it leads.
	So they go around the country about any and every violent crime that happened around the country.
	And, you know, what is happening in Chicago doesn't really affect you here, if you don't live in Chicago.
	But when they look at it, it gives them perception that crime is just escalating everywhere, exponentially.
	That's not the case. Anyway, a caseworker for CPS came by, told the family that the police report said that he had been unattended from 8 in the morning until 2 p.m.
	They said that's not true.
	Swim practice had ended by 10.45.
	Everyone had been home well before lunch, even after he was detained, to talk to the police.
	And so the caseworker closed the investigation.
	She even said, my kids could learn a bit more independence from you.
	She said, so the first one was friendly.
	But that wasn't the end of it.
	Later that year for Christmas, he got a new bike.
	On January 2nd, just before lunch, he asked his mom if he could ride it.
	An older woman in the park stopped him, told him that he was too young to ride his bike alone.
	According to Jackson, he took a few more circles around the park and then ducked into the grocery store for another free cookie.
	Soon thereafter, the mother got a call from him.
	They had given, because of this event, they had also given him a new watch phone so he could make a phone call.
	Well, that would have been great back in the day.
	Dick Tracy watch. Anyway, he said, the police want to speak to you.
	So she got to the grocery store lot in just a couple of minutes because it's only a couple of blocks away.
	Her son, Jackson, was seated like a suspect in the backseat of a cruiser.
	She later learned that child services had been informed about his flagrant act of riding a bike unaccompanied.
	I mean, I looked at this stuff and I thought, I used to ride my bike for hours in the afternoon after I got out of school.
	Everywhere. All the time.
	It's just insane what it's like now.
	And it's so rare.
	To see kids outside, even in their own yard.
	Like I said here once before, when Karen and I were writing and we saw some kids playing in the yard of their own house, isn't that strange to see that now?
	And why is that strange to see?
	Why isn't that being done by kids everywhere?
	Well, because of busybodies like this.
	Then on January the 18th, Again, he wants some more free cookies.
	So he went back to that same grocery store after riding his bike.
	Another store employee called the police again.
	This kid needs to learn a lesson.
	The cookies are just too much of a temptation for him.
	He's got to understand.
	These employees have got it out for him.
	They're snitches. As a matter of fact, this employee wanted to keep him there, so he gave him free chicken and fries.
	It was lunchtime, to keep him there until the cops got there.
	So, they took him home, along with his bike.
	The father came to the door to hear what the cops had to say about his son, the cookie...
	The cookie recidivist.
	One of the police officers accused the father of breaking the law, quote-unquote, by letting Jackson go out alone.
	Father said, what law is that?
	And the cop said, you can Google it.
	This is like what we had all the way through the COVID stuff, right?
	That's the law. No, it's not the law The most senior officer accused him of neglect and contributing to the delinquency of a minor and told him not only could he be arrested But he might face felony charges and spend time in jail then a case worker from CPS showed up two hours later unlike the first time Where she left and complimented the family this one was very accusatory He was a family of having a problem with child supervision.
	When Beth and Glenn, the parents, asked what specific law they had broken, she said she didn't have it written down.
	The caseworker then questioned all four children at the kitchen table and notified the parents that they would be subject to a parenting plan requiring them to supervise their children at all times.
	The witness told them that they would not be following the plan.
	Upon hearing this unusual response, the caseworker warned them that she would talk to her supervisor.
	I'll get you and your little dog, too.
	I'll be right back.
	So, they were afraid that they could get put on a child abuse and neglect registry, so they decided to move the family outside the city limits.
	They relocated, because they had a bad local government.
	You know, you may not be able to get people elected that are good.
	You may have to move.
	But that is far more effective than getting so focused on national politics.
	Again, look at this.
	You know, bad local people just move to a different neighborhood, and they don't have to worry about it anymore.
	But they're trying to get a state law put in.
	Again, they can solve it at the local level, but they want to move it up to the state level.
	These types of things, local and state, are going to make the biggest difference in your life.
	Better or worse, depending on where you are.
	But then, of course, here's an example where the local police are even worse.
	This is the case, and you probably have seen it now.
	It got put up...
	On Friday, this was a young 15-year-old girl who was shot dead by the police about 18 months ago, September of 2022, in San Bernardino, the sheriff's department.
	And this ain't their first rodeo.
	They've had a lot. Of accusations of abuse of force and everything.
	But I've talked about them about committing armed robbery on an armored car.
	With the excuse that this armored car had stopped by a legal marijuana store.
	Legal in California. One of the most egregious examples of highway robbery from cops.
	They call it civil asset forfeiture.
	That I've ever seen.
	and it was the same group of people. So there was a reporter who had filed for some Freedom of Information, part of the Freedom of Information Act FOIA request, and he finally got this 18 months after the fact. And what he found hit on Friday, and it is really being picked up by a lot of people.
	Savannah Graziano, 15, shot by sheriff's deputies in 2022 while unarmed and while following their instructions to move toward them, is now what has shown up here.
	And so this is the Guardian that broke this news out of the UK. She was...
	Feared to be abducted by her father after he had fatally shot her mother the day before.
	And so these guys were all hyped up.
	You know, we got somebody who committed a murder.
	And it was reported that this guy, the father, had abducted his daughter.
	And so, you know, they're all, you know, Barney Fife.
	They've got their single bullet or more, I guess, in their guns.
	And they're all hyped up about this stuff.
	They cornered his vehicle on the side of a freeway.
	When she exited the vehicle, they opened fire and killed her.
	The shooting sparked national concern, with critics questioning how officers wound up killing the teenage girl they were tasked with rescuing.
	Sheriff's officials claimed following the shooting that it was unclear whether she was shot by deputies or by her father, and they said deputies didn't realize it was her when she got out of the car.
	And for nearly two years, they refused to release the footage of the shooting.
	But then when we see the footage of the shooting, we see what really happened.
	And so, it reminds me of some friends that we had from England that I worked with in Houston.
	He was from England.
	His parents and his brother came over and they were driving around and that day there was a robbery and the police showed up and were in hot pursuit of the Of the perps, and they went to, I think it was a hotel alongside the road, and then there was a shootout.
	Okay, these guys barricade themselves in the hotel, and there's a shootout.
	And the cops are shooting them, and, you know, they're shooting back.
	And they don't know anything is happening, and they're driving their car, and it's the two parents in the front seat, and the brother is in the back seat behind the passenger, on the passenger side.
	And all of a sudden, this bang hits the car.
	And they were going under a bridge at the time.
	They thought something had been dropped off the bridge, and they pull over to see what had happened to the car that they'd rented.
	And there was a hole in the car, and it was exactly lined up with the guy in the back seat.
	And if it had been about two inches higher, it wouldn't have gone into the metal in the trunk.
	It wouldn't have gone into him, gone through the glass and gone into him.
	It's a really close call.
	And as they pull over, and they open it up, and there's the bullet there in the trunk, and cops come up.
	And they look at it, and they grab it, and they go, that's not ours.
	And they left. It could have been theirs, it could have been the other people, but they took the evidence with them.
	And just kind of shut it down at that point.
	And their response was, But it was really egregious what had happened.
	So they had about a dozen video files that they released on Friday to an independent journalist, Joyce Scott, who filed records requesting 18 months prior.
	The clips, which were shared with The Guardian and included helicopter footage, shows deputies shooting at the 15-year-old girl as she followed their instructions to move toward them.
	The videos also suggest that deputies shot her after two officers remarked that it was the girl who exited.
	They said it makes clear, this footage, that she was killed by the deputies and not by her father, first of all.
	The footage will increase scrutiny on this sheriff's department, which is already under fire, after deputies last month killed Ryan Gaynor, an autistic 15-year-old boy.
	So, last month, they killed an autistic 15-year-old boy.
	18 months to two years ago, they killed a 15-year-old girl who had been kidnapped, the victim that they were supposed to rescue.
	Ryan was having a mental health episode when he was fatally shot by two deputies within seconds of encountering him.
	The killing raised concerns about the use of lethal force on children and failure to de-escalate crises.
	What we have here is failure to communicate.
	No mention about the fact in this article, no mention about their past history.
	This sheriff's department is a corrupt gang of thieves, of highway robbers.
	And just briefly, it was a San Bernardino police legal marijuana shop.
	I just mentioned it yesterday, I think, because there's another shop where they went in, not the same sheriff's department, but another one, and stole between $1 and $1.5 million worth of cannabis from this legal store.
	And regardless of what you think about cannabis, and I'm not a big supporter of cannabis either, but there are laws.
	And if you have lawless government, especially lawless law enforcement, that's an oxymoron, isn't it?
	If these people operate as thieves and say the laws don't apply to them, that's the most dangerous scenario you could have.
	It's a lot more dangerous than cannabis, isn't it?
	And so what this San Bernardino Sheriff's Department did, they laid in wait for an armored car that had stopped by a legal marijuana store and robbed it, claiming it was civil asset forfeiture because the federal government would give them, would take 20% of what they stole and give them 80% back.
	And so they did that the first time and got a lot of money, a lot of cash.
	And I forget what the numbers were, but it was like a million dollars or something.
	The next time, when the armored company went through, they didn't get as much.
	And then the third time, the deputies just kept doing this, the third time.
	They not only didn't have any money there, but they kind of baited them by driving through and made them think that they'd been to this place.
	And they had a recording there, and they got these guys talking about, I thought we'd get about a million dollars.
	That's what they told us we'd get from this thing.
	They're outright criminals and thieves.
	And this is the same department shooting 15-year-olds dead everywhere.
	Shoot first, ask questions later.
	This is what happens when the police become criminals.
	The search for Savannah, the 15-year-old girl, had started when her father shot and killed her mother, his estranged wife, and shot at a father and his child outside of a school.
	So then they issued an amber alert for Savannah, saying that she was suspected of having been abducted or taken by her father.
	The following morning, a 9-11 caller reported seeing his pickup truck at a gas station.
	That's how the chase began.
	They corner him in one area. When the car stopped near the deputies, the footage shows that Savannah exited the vehicle, and a CHP official on the radio can be heard stating, Girl is out.
	The girl is out, guys.
	She's out on the passenger side.
	And I say CHP, that's California Highway Patrol.
	That's the helicopter.
	The video shows that she crouches on the ground for about 10 seconds and then walks toward a group of about seven deputies, followed by a boom that appears to be at least one deputy shooting her.
	The CHP dispatcher can be heard saying, Oh, no.
	The deputies were not wearing body cameras, but the department also shared audio from the belt of the deputy standing closest to the girl.
	That audio captures the deputy shouting, Passenger, get out!
	As gunfire is heard in the background, the deputy then shouts, come to me, come, come, walk, walk, walk.
	He then says, hey, stop, stop shooting her, he's in the car.
	And you can hear a deputy calling her over and telling other deputies that the person who exited the truck was a passenger for them to stop firing, but it was too late.
	She was pronounced dead at a hospital.
	The father was also shot by the deputies and died at the scene, though the clips do not make it clear when that happened.
	The department said that Savannah was wearing a tactical gear and helmet when she exited.
	So what? She's got camo on?
	So what? But the footage doesn't clearly capture her outfit, they said.
	So... A civil rights lawyer in San Bernardino County reviewed the footage.
	She said it was possible that there was contagious fire, that one guy jumped the gun, fired, and then all of them start firing and they empty their gun, right?
	That's what happened.
	They're not trained. They're not trained.
	They don't have the aptitude or the right attitude about any of this stuff.
	She said San Bernardino County does not train law enforcement to handle these high-stress situations appropriately.
	They have a very brutal approach of shoot first, ask questions later.
	And they're not alone in that.
	If you go back to the beginning of the Obama administration, there was a case in New Mexico.
	I think it was just outside of Albuquerque.
	There was a hobo that was living up in the hills.
	And there was body cam footage.
	They go up and they try to get him to come down.
	They're all parked out on a hill.
	And so the deputies are there to distance and they want him to come.
	And he doesn't want to leave.
	And so they wind up shooting him and then sticking a dog on him.
	He didn't have anything that he threatened them with at all.
	And about that time, there was a guy who had been an instructor for many, many years in the State Police Academy.
	And he says, I'm resigning.
	This new curriculum is being pushed on us from the Obama administration.
	It is a shoot-first curriculum.
	We've never taught that before.
	We've never used that before.
	When they get into any situation where it's going to be strenuous or they might feel slightly endangered, they're encouraged to just shoot first.
	And once they shoot, everybody else along with them shoots.
	This has been something that has been pushed out, starting with the Obama administration.
	It's widely circulated. The footage puts more pressure on an already embattled department of highway robbers and murderers.
	In addition to the killing of Ryan Gaynor, the other 15-year-old, the 15-year-old boy a month earlier, the department has faced criticisms after a video last week captured a deputy punching and kneeing a man under arrest.
	In December, a sheriff's deputy was arrested on suspicion of being under the influence of cocaine and resigned.
	Last year, the sheriff's department also faced wrongful death and wrongful arrest lawsuits.
	But nobody talks about the fact that they committed three armed robberies.
	To steal and keep the cash and split it amongst themselves.
	Totally criminal department.
	So, hang on just one second.
	So what is happening with D.A.R.E.? You remember that?
	You remember the D.A.R.E.? The Drug Abuse Resistance Education Program.
	Fortunately, this happened long after I got out of school.
	But I thought it was interesting because I did not realize until I saw this.
	This is an article in Reason talking about how it never worked.
	It didn't make any difference at all on drug use.
	It was kind of a just say no.
	You know, that was Reagan's approach.
	Nancy Reagan, just say no.
	And it didn't work.
	But what it did was it normalized police being in schools.
	And where it came from.
	It was from Daryl Gates, the police chief of L.A. The same guy who began SWAT teams and SWAT raids and militarized police and police with armored vehicles and all the rest of the stuff.
	And when it all hit the fan with Rodney King, what did Daryl Gates and his highly militarized police department do?
	They protected themselves.
	Led everybody else on their own.
	Well, when you look at what happened with DARE, it began in 1983.
	At its height, over 75% of American schools participated in the program.
	It cost American taxpayers about $750 million a year.
	The guy who wrote this for a reason says, as a DARE graduate myself, he says, I vaguely recall presentations given by somebody from the local police department.
	On one occasion, he told a student to act like they were drunk and pretend to offer the class beer while the rest of us screamed at her in reply.
	Yeah, I'm sure that this is very effective at discouraging drug and alcohol use by kids, don't you think?
	He said, in hindsight, Dare is primarily remembered as a joke, a bunch of cops acting out hokey anti-drug skits.
	Kind of like the churches that you see in many places, like that, you know, Batman crucified in that church in, I think it was in Canada.
	You know, hokey skits.
	Amateur time, right?
	Yeah. By 1994, a decade after the founding of the program, studies clearly indicated that the D.A.R.E. curriculum had little to no effect on youth drug use.
	By the 2010s, it had become a popular source of parody.
	When then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions praised the program's effectiveness in 2017, D.A.R.E. graduates noted on social media how they still smoke pot in their black and red shirts.
	While D.A.R.E. did not work in the sense of keeping kids from using drugs, they argue that the program was wildly, the author who's going back and talking about this in retrospect, said the program was wildly successful at normalizing the presence of police and normalizing the war on drugs in people's everyday lives.
	And again, created by this hideous cop, Daryl Gates, who left us a legacy of SWAT teams, which unfortunately are still with us, even though the DARE program isn't.
	But the DARE program actually grew up and metastasized into something else.
	DARE officers were explicitly trained to act as educators, not as law enforcement.
	They were billed to students as trusted confidence, but they showed up in uniform.
	And many times, even though it was against the rules, they would show up with a service weapon.
	Officials like Gates defined their role within the law enforcement framework.
	Dare to say no posits that improving the public's perception of police was at least as important to Dare's mission as keeping them off of drugs, you see.
	It's another one of these PR things, like J. Edgar Hoover did with the FBI, with Ephraim Zimblis Jr., if you remember that.
	That was all a PR thing by Jagger Hoover to make the FBI look good.
	A qualified DARE officer was the linchpin not only for reducing drug use, but also for transforming public perceptions of the police and reshaping relationship between the police and communities.
	Except that they're not there walking the beat, which is what the cops used to do.
	You can go back and you can look at early movies and you see that happening.
	You even listen to the New York Police Department whistleblower, Adrian Schoolcraft.
	His father was a cop.
	He wanted to be a cop. He was not happy with what the New York Police Department was doing in terms of arresting people for nothing like on a Halloween night.
	Just bring everybody back.
	We'll figure out what to charge them with when you get them back here.
	It's like, what? I'm not going to do that.
	So he started recording it.
	They didn't know that he was recording them at first, but they decided they would punish him for pushing back against ideas like just, you know, bring people in and we'll figure out what to charge them with.
	And so what they did to punish him was they made him walk a beat.
	And so they didn't realize that's what I wanted to do.
	He got to know the people on his beat.
	And he wasn't going to harass them for minor violations of other things.
	And they were really big on harassment.
	No smoking in your barbershop or whatever.
	And if the barbers stood outside their shop and smoked a cigarette, they'd give them a ticket for loitering because they're smoking outside the barbershop, standing on the sidewalk.
	That kind of stuff.
	He didn't do that.
	He liked walking the beach.
	That's the way you establish a relationship with a police department if they're interested in doing that.
	But they're not. It's gone the other direction.
	As a matter of fact, this whole idea of urban police and everything began with the Bobbies, Robert Peeler in the UK. And then it operated like that in the early 20th century in America, in the cities.
	But then they changed it, and now the British have adopted the American model and rejected the idea of what I would call real community policing.
	Dare provided a blueprint to present cops as role models to kids while aggressively prosecuting the war, the drug war against their parents.
	And they did prosecute parents.
	Dare's history is full of stories in which a student told an officer about a parent's drug use only to find the parent in handcuffs later.
	In one egregious example, a guidance counselor asked 11 year old Crystal Grindel if her parents used drugs, assured, as she later recalled, that, quote, nothing would happen.
	Crystal admitted that her parents smoked marijuana.
	Days later, three Dare officers interrogated Crystal about her parents' drug habits and asked her to report back on the number of marijuana plants in their home.
	One officer told her that her parents would be arrested unless she cooperated, and that she shouldn't tell her parents about the interrogation, since often parents beat their children after their children talked to the police, he said.
	When she cooperated, the police raided her home, arrested her parents, took her and her younger sister to a distant relative's house because the police had failed to find arrangements for the girls prior to the raid.
	Her family later successfully sued the department, and a court found that the officers' coercive actions, quote-unquote, were shocking to the conscience and were unworthy of constitutional protections of the court.
	But the program's officials were undeterred.
	In such environments, they said, there is usually no morals, no values for training the child, said one DARE administrator.
	He quoted as saying, my personal opinion is that an arrest is the best thing that could ever happen to that parent.
	In the 1990s, groups like Parents Against DARE sprung up to oppose this.
	Skeptical of its effectiveness, Parents Against DARE was more concerned with the loss of parental control.
	And states' potential surveillance of the family via their children as informants.
	Schools began dropping the program in the mid-1990s.
	Congressional Republicans elected in 1994.
	That was when Newt Gingrich had his contract with America.
	Remember that? He had 10 points, I think, something like that.
	And it was very effective.
	And they had some good things on there.
	But they really were kind of side issues.
	I ran against one of the freshman congressmen that got elected in 1994.
	I ran against her in 1996.
	She's still there. Virginia Fox.
	And I said, I've got a contract with America, too.
	Mine is 10 points.
	It's called the Bill of Rights.
	Anyway, so at this point, they couldn't get rid of dare.
	It was too ingrained in American culture to kill outright.
	Most politicians are too afraid of looking soft on drug abuse if they tried to do it.
	You'd be accused of advocating, and I get accused of that all the time.
	When I talk about the abuses of civil asset forfeiture, when I talk about the corruption and the ineffectiveness of the drug war, Whenever I talk about that, people say, well, you're just supporting drugs.
	It's like, no, I'm not. I'm anti-prohibition.
	And there are a lot of law enforcement officers who know that that hasn't done any good.
	Instead, what it has done is destroyed the rule of law.
	It has corrupted court systems and police officers.
	And it has given us a more concentrated form of what they're trying to prohibit.
	It always works that way. And take a look at the war on drugs that's gone on for so many years now.
	Look at how powerful the Mexican drug cartels have become.
	Anyway, the National Institute of Justice list 2009 is the end of the program, but it actually still exists on a smaller scale.
	The officer as an instructor is still the central figure.
	And that is the lasting legacy of DARE. As schools began to adopt resource officers after the 1999 Columbine school shooting, the DARE cop proved to be the perfect template.
	DARE officers gave way to permanent school resource officers, or SROs.
	The integration between schools and police was complete.
	See, that's how these programs go.
	And so effective, wasn't it?
	I mean, you know, we have one of these school resource officers down in Parkland.
	When the shooting started there, he ran the other direction.
	Right? Well, as the CIA, America's 1984-style big brother, I started looking for the Pompeo clip, as I mentioned earlier today, and I couldn't find it anywhere.
	I didn't have it on my hard drive, so I started looking on the internet.
	And lo and behold, I found it.
	And it was me! I talked about it five years ago, April of 2019.
	So I'm going to give you a clip here.
	It's going to run for a little bit of time, but I talk a lot about what Pompey was doing and the CIA. As this article says, assassination, stealing elections, manipulating media, trafficking drugs, spying on Americans.
	Oh, that's just part of it. They also like to start wars and escalate wars as well, don't they?
	So here's what I had about somebody.
	I didn't. This wasn't even on my channel.
	Somebody else had put this up.
	This is five years ago, April 2019.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Now, this is something that most of us missed.
	It was picked up by a Christian news organization and then picked up by Zero Hedge.
	That's where I saw the write-up about it.
	But it was absolutely amazing what he had to say.
	And remember, as we play this clip for you, this is a guy who has accused WikiLeaks of being a non-state hostile intelligence agency manipulated by Russia.
	Do you believe that? I don't know that you're going to believe anything that Mike Pompeo says after you hear this clip.
	We've got that repeated by all the major news organizations, all the establishment media, the Mockingbird Press.
	Remember Operation Mockingbird from the CIA getting the establishment media to give you the news straight from the CIA. Now we've got former CIA people, former NSA people, Clapper, Brennan, and others.
	Now they actually are the talking heads, the commentators.
	They do it directly. But I want to play for you this clip where he's talking about the difference between Between the culture at West Point, where he was a student, and the culture at the CIA, where he was director.
	One of them was a culture of integrity.
	The other one was a culture of lies and deception.
	Here's Mike Pompeo a week ago at Texas A&M. These are many, many tough places out there.
	Having said that, not all tough places are the same.
	They each present a different set of challenges.
	It reminds me. You would know this.
	This is a bit of an aside.
	But in terms of how you think about problem sets, when I was a cadet, what's the cadet motto at West Point?
	You will not lie, cheat, or steal, or tolerate those who do.
	I was the CIA director.
	We lied, we cheated, we steal, and stole.
	We had entire training courses.
	They're applauding that.
	They like that. Isn't that interesting?
	It reminds you of the glory of the American experiment.
	And so when you deal with these countries, you have to just recognize they're not all the same.
	Some of these difficult, nasty places want to partner with the United States and just haven't gotten to the right place yet, just haven't been able to move their own institutions.
	Okay, now, that is absolutely amazing.
	It's amazing, the crowd reaction.
	Everybody knows that the CIA lies, cheats, and steals.
	It's just kind of amusing when you've got the former director of the CIA saying that, that they lie, they cheat, they steal.
	And he said when he was at West Point, We're told you will not lie, cheat, or steal, or tolerate those who do.
	But he not only tolerated them, he became part of that culture.
	He talks about this.
	I want to play that full clip for you instead of just that little bit of a clip there contrasting West Point and the CIA. I want to play that full thing for you because he's talking about different problem sets that you come up with, different cultures, different institutions.
	And he said we have to realize when we deal with all these countries that they're not all the same.
	I guess what he's meaning is that some of these places are difficult and nasty places, as he said.
	So maybe some of the countries that you deal with are kind of like the CIA. I guess that'd be like Saudi Arabia and so forth, right?
	They're very much connected to the CIA, and they do business the way the CIA does.
	They torture, they dismember people, they lie about it.
	But then you have other countries, I don't know where those countries are, that are like the culture of West Point.
	I don't know what country that would be anymore.
	I used to think that America was like West Point, where we didn't lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.
	But now our country is governed by the CIA. Understand that.
	And we do lie, we do cheat, we do steal.
	And when anybody exposes the CIA, lying, cheating, stealing, torturing, murdering, those people are the ones who go to jail, like John Kiriakou.
	Not the liars, not the cheaters, not the assassins.
	It's the people who expose it who go to jail in America.
	And so he was saying we have difficult, nasty places that want to partner with the United States, and they just haven't gotten to the right place yet.
	And they haven't been able to move their own institutions.
	So is he saying that we haven't been able to...
	The nasty, difficult place that we have is the CIA, and we haven't been able to get them to where West Point is?
	Did he move them in that direction?
	Or did he just go along with them?
	I think when you look at that, he just went along with them.
	I don't see any change in the CIA. Frankly, I don't see any change in Washington either.
	Because President Trump put Gina Haspel, the lying, cheating, stealing, murdering, torturing CIA bureaucrat in charge of the CIA. So yeah, we're not moving them to the right place yet, are we?
	We're not moving them at all.
	Instead, the nasty institution, the CIA, is moving the rest of the American government in their direction.
	Just to underscore that, I want to play another clip for you.
	Let's get clip number two.
	He talks about the cultural challenges, institutional challenges, when he used to run a tank platoon and so forth.
	So let's play that clip, clip number two.
	The second piece is cultural, inside an institution.
	I have run a tank platoon.
	I was an executive officer in a cavalry troop.
	I ran two small businesses, then was the director of the CIA, and now I'm running the State Department.
	Every organization has to have an ethos, a central mission set that is clearly understood.
	You understand that every organization has to have an ethos, a central mission set that is clearly understood.
	Everybody there at that Texas A&M speech, everybody there understood when he said, at the CIA we lied, we cheated, we stole.
	They understood that is the ethos of the CIA. That is their mission statement.
	And it is clearly understood.
	Everyone in foreign countries understands that, and unfortunately we in America understand that, and we tolerate that.
	We tolerate that.
	Frank Serpico, most of you remember the movie where he was played by Al Pacino.
	But Frank Serpico, real life Frank Serpico, said every institution is going to be comprised of people.
	Whether it's the police, whether it's the CIA, whatever.
	You're always going to have bad people in any institution.
	The question is, will the institution purge the bad people or will it embrace and protect the bad people?
	That's the real issue.
	Frank Serpico has tried to get police departments everywhere to purge bad people.
	Except in most cases, they protect them.
	They circle around them.
	Somebody's in uniform and they do something, no matter how illegal, no matter how criminal, they protect them.
	That's what Frank Serpico saw.
	That's why he's trying to stop.
	And that's what we have done with the CIA. You look at it, and time and time again, what we see, whether it is John Kiriakou at the CIA, whether it's William Binney at the NSA, the people who are blowing the whistle on illegal people, It's the whistleblowers who go to jail.
	That's why our institutions in America have become so...
	We have embraced this lying, cheating, stealing ethos.
	That has become our mission statement.
	We have embraced the corruption.
	Our institutions are thoroughly corrupt from top to bottom.
	It's not a couple of people at the top who went after President Trump.
	It is the entire deep state.
	It's very broad. It's very dark.
	And we have all embraced it, just like you heard those people applauding.
	All right, I got another couple of clips here.
	From Mike Pompeo.
	And this is a question and answer period.
	He's talking about and kind of openly talking to people at Texas A&M. This is a week ago again.
	This is pretty much under the radar because of what was happening at the same time we had Notre Dame burning.
	But basically Mike Pompeo burned the CIA and himself.
	As I just played for you in the last segment, he said, when I was at West Point, the cadet motto at West Point was, you will not lie, cheat, or steal, or tolerate those who do.
	But I was also CIA director, and we lied, we cheated, we stole.
	That was the entire training course, he said.
	And the audience loved it.
	The audience embraced that.
	Not everybody, quite frankly.
	The Christian news show that picked this up.
	He said, that's not the resume of the Secretary of State.
	That's the resume of Satan.
	And it is. It is.
	And I want to tell you what he had to say about being director of the CIA in conjunction with the false flag gas attacks that the CIA and the deep state were using to try to rope us in to a deeper war with Syria.
	He's quite proud of the fact that he was able to lie Here's a play video clip number three.
	The director of the CIA at the time, when Bashar Assad had used chemical weapons against his own people, your government was able to, in the course of a very eventful 36 hours, do all the groundwork that was needed to make sure that we could respond, to let them, the leader there in Syria, understand that this was unacceptable and this administration wasn't going to allow the use of chemical weapons.
	Assad used chemical weapons against his own people.
	We moved quickly. We moved accurately.
	The Department of Defense did its task flawlessly.
	It was a demonstration of American capacity to move in crisis moments in a way that is very effective.
	It was an example of how you can have the entire bureaucracy come together.
	To get the president to do something that he said he would not do.
	And that is continue to push this operation in favor of al-Qaeda.
	Understand, when you attack Assad in Syria, you're siding with al-Qaeda.
	Just as John McCain did.
	And we had seen this on an annual basis.
	That's what's inexcusable about this whole thing.
	That they would do this on an annual basis and that the mainstream media would join with the CIA, join with the Defense Department in pushing this false flag on an annual basis.
	They did it three years in a row.
	And last year, on the third year, they upped the ante and they put in a fake narrative about Nerve gas poisoning in the UK, which was equally absurd.
	They had to do something that was different.
	And immediately you had Nikki Haley join in with Theresa May to lie to the British and American people to try to get us involved on the side of ISIS to be their air force and so forth and to launch attacks against Assad.
	This is part of the regime change.
	Very dangerous game that the CIA plays.
	They side with ISIS for a while, and then take out ISIS, and then they want to weaken the Assad government so much that they can go in and do their regime change, which has been on the list of things to do for about 20 years.
	And this list has not changed.
	Regardless of whether we have a Republican or Democrat president, regardless of whether that president is President Trump, who said he wasn't going to play that game.
	And I want to play you one more clip here where they're talking about the Syrian chemical strike.
	Here is Mike Pompeo again, talking about how they sell false flags.
	I talked about the Syria chemical strike.
	The first in the barrel to respond to that was the CIA. The president wanted to know immediately, were they really chemical weapons that were fired or was this right?
	We all seen YouTube videos that turned out not to be true.
	What were the chemical weapons actually fired by the regime that they actually had civilians?
	What was the magnitude? What was the scope?
	What was the nature of those chemical weapons?
	Before he could make a decision or even consider a recommendation by his Secretary of State about how to respond, he needed to have best-in-class data.
	And we were under the gun.
	The CIA, the Intelligence Committee doesn't get things right every time.
	As a history, it's made mistakes.
	It's imperfect like the rest of us.
	So we were under the gun. The president gave us just a handful of hours and we deployed an amazing team and a team of chemists and physicists and engineers and battlefield experts and explosive device experts and folks who spend their whole life looking at potholes in the road to decide what it was that actually created that Pause that right there.
	Pause that right there. This is a guy who says that the CIA, they lied, they cheated, they stole.
	Now, when he's talking about the pothole, we've shown in the picture, many times we've had chemical weapons experts showed the pothole that had the exploded canister in it.
	The canister was crushed.
	It was not part of a ballistic launch that was there.
	That pothole that he's talking about was actually evidence to show that it was not the Assad regime that did it, but that it was done locally.
	And so he lies and refers to the very evidence that mitigates against the narrative that they sold the president.
	Isn't it interesting how many CIA people Trump had in his administration?
	The Secretary of State is Mike Pompeo that we're just looking at there.
	He had as his Attorney General, Bill Barr.
	The two of them really wanted Julian Assange.
	And then he promoted to be head of the CIA, Gina Haspel, who had lied to us.
	Not only did she torture people and do the cover-up, destroy the videos and everything, and John Kiriakou went to jail for exposing what she had done.
	But she did the torture and then she produced documents that were total lies and lied us into the Iraq war.
	So here you have Pompeo as part of this administration, the Trump administration.
	We've got Haspel who lied us into the Iraq war.
	Haspel and Pompeo trying to lie us into a Syrian war.
	And here we are now.
	We're getting ready to go in against Iran because of what Israel just initiated.
	You know, taking out another one of their generals and attacking Damascus, a Damascus building there.
	Yeah, it's just one war after the other for these people.
	Is it any wonder that they hate Julian Assange so much?
	Because this is what he said in 2011.
	Yeah. Because the goal is not to completely subjugate Afghanistan.
	The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the United States, out of the tax bases of European countries, through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational security alliance.
	That is the goal, i.e.
	the goal is to have an endless war, not a successful war.
	And things have changed a lot, haven't they?
	Instead of, you know, using Afghanistan to launder money back into the hands of these elites, now we've got Ukraine to do it.
	Rinse and repeat.
	Rinse and repeat. This guy had to be put in jail.
	They wanted him very badly.
	In an interview in 2021, Trump was asked, why didn't you pardon Julian Assange or Ed Snowden?
	And Trump said, well, in one case, you have a spy deal.
	And then in another case, exposing real corruption.
	Now, I'm not going to say which is which.
	So one of them was a spy.
	The other one was exposing corruption.
	Was it Snowden?
	Was it Assange? Now, RFK Jr.
	says he's going to pardon Ed Snowden if elected president.
	Why isn't Trump talking about helping Julian Assange anymore?
	Well, we were told by Alex Jones that on midnight of January the 20th, as he was, you know, as Trump is getting ready to leave office, he was going to pardon Julian Assange.
	He had it on good source.
	You know, he and Trump are just like this, you know, the 4D chess brothers, partners, you know, and all that stuff.
	Well, this is...
	What Trump, you know, after Julian Assange helped Trump by releasing truth about Hillary Clinton and said, well, we know what Hillary Clinton is.
	We don't know what Trump is.
	We'll wait and find out. Well, he found out.
	He found out that Trump was a puppet of the CIA. Just take a look at his administration.
	He was a puppet of the CIA. He was a puppet of Goldman Sachs.
	He was a puppet of Israel.
	He was a puppet of all these different institutions.
	Do you still love WikiLeaks?
	Uh, I know nothing about WikiLeaks.
	It's not my thing. WikiLeaks!
	I love WikiLeaks.
	WikiLeaks. The WikiLeaks document show.
	The Hillary Clinton documents released by WikiLeaks.
	Today WikiLeaks release new emails.
	Secret speeches released by WikiLeaks.
	The WikiLeaks revelations through WikiLeaks.
	WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks.
	Of course, he didn't know that there was a thing called WikiLeaks, right?
	He didn't know about that.
	Yeah, yeah, he didn't know about that.
	He didn't know about that. And he's a little cryptic.
	Oh, you know, one of these guys is a real spy deal, and the other one is like exposing real corruption.
	I don't know which is which, but he didn't pardon either one of them.
	So, RFK Jr.
	is saying he'll pardon Snowden if elected president.
	He said, and you know, when I talk about the CIA, there was a World Net Daily article, and they talk about how they've overthrown governments, how they start wars, and all the rest of the stuff.
	But then the whole thing became about how the CIA was against Trump.
	Look, you have people like Brennan, Michael Hayden, Clapper.
	The CIA is not monolithic.
	Like any other institution, it is politicized.
	It's got its Republican and Democrat sides or whatever.
	But Trump was thoroughly embedded with the CIA, thoroughly controlled by them.
	There were factions within the CIA that didn't like him.
	No doubt about it.
	But getting back to Snowden and RFK Jr.
	says his brave actions led Congress to restrict the surveillance authority of the intelligence community for the first time in 40 years.
	The America I love doesn't punish whistleblowers.
	Truth-tellers who champion free speech and try to return America to its democratic and humanitarian ideals should be revered, not persecuted.
	In 2016, the House Intelligence Committee released a declassified version of an investigative report on Snowden describing Snowden's actions as showing a reckless disregard for American safety and U.S. national security.
	However, a 2020 U.S. appeals court found that the program Mr.
	Snowden had exposed was unlawful, and that the U.S. officials who had publicly defended it were not telling the truth.
	So, again, as I said earlier in the program, RFK Jr.
	is talking about having a petition released.
	He wants to get 300,000 signatures to pressure the Biden administration to act.
	He says, and if you vote for me, I'll put him out.
	He said, prior to Ed Snowden, nobody knew the intelligence agencies were illegally mining all of our data and spying on American citizens.
	No, we did. We did.
	We absolutely knew it.
	I remember when James Clapper said, well, no, Senator, not intentionally.
	We all knew it. And you know what's even worse?
	All the people in the Senate panel all knew it as well.
	Other people in the Senate knew it as well, and they were okay with it.
	As a matter of fact, Michael Hayden, and I had a clip of it that I played many, many times.
	I won't play it today. But Michael Hayden went to Washington and Lee University, talked to the legal crowd there, and he said...
	You know, I'm so angry at Senator Wyden.
	He knew. His staff knew.
	All of them knew what we were doing.
	Why did he put him in that position?
	That position where James Clapper committed perjury.
	But don't worry, Hayden.
	Your co-conspirators in Congress, both Republicans and Democrats, never charged him with perjury.
	Why is that?
	You know, everybody talks about the double standard, don't they?
	Oh, look at this.
	At the same time that, the same day that Peter Navarro goes to jail for not coming to talk to Congress for defying their subpoena or whatever, the same day that he goes to jail, he got Hunter Biden just blowing off a subpoena from Congress.
	What's going to happen to him? Will he be charged?
	No, he won't. Just like James Clapper committed perjury on something that's very substantive.
	It was something that affected every single American, and yet the statute of limitations, five years past, nobody, nobody charged him.
	Not a single Republican or Democrat charged Clapper with perjury.
	Why do you think that is?
	You think they might be afraid to do that?
	Spineless politicians afraid to do that?
	Well, this guy is running an illegal operation, which is what the judge said.
	You know, this is an illegal, unlawful, unconstitutional program.
	And what he did was he exposed it.
	Yeah, we all knew that, actually.
	And I remember when Snowden came out with his book, Permanent Record.
	I pre-ordered that, and I got that in the afternoon.
	And before my show the next morning, I read that entire book and annotated it.
	And nobody cared. I said, look at what this guy's saying.
	He gives you, it's like typical limited hangout.
	I don't trust Snowden at all, folks.
	Honestly, don't. What he did in that book was a complete limited hangout.
	Because even though he had told you a few things that were true, the documents that came out were very useful in terms of showing people the stuff.
	But did anything change? No.
	They released that stuff, nothing changes.
	And what does that do? Well, the CIA and the intelligence community takes that as permission to do it.
	When nothing happens to them, that's like a seal of approval from Congress and from the American people that they can continue to do it.
	That's what's dangerous about this pandemic stuff.
	The fact that nobody has paid any price for this is a seal of approval.
	From Congress and from the American people.
	And so they feel emboldened to take it to the next level, to take it to a global level of global governance by the World Health Organization.
	That's where I began today.
	So, yeah, Snowden was talking nonsense about a whole bunch of stuff.
	I won't go into it now, but I mean, it was just...
	He's feeding you all the usual lies from the CIA and occasionally drop in a dabble of truth and make it sound good.
	But I spent a lot of time talking about it, but nobody was interested.
	Maybe you're not interested in this either.
	But RFK Jr.
	says, so it's not surprising that those same intelligence agencies are now trying to portray Snowden as a criminal and that captive politicians are supporting that narrative.
	He said, this isn't the Soviet Union.
	The America I love doesn't imprison dissonance.
	Okay, so JFK, what do you think about the J6ers, right?
	What do you think about them? They're the political dissidents that are being imprisoned right now, the most obvious ones.
	What do you think about that, RFK? Our founders put free speech as the First Amendment because all of our other rights depend on it.
	If you give government license to silence its critics, it now has license for any atrocity.
	And this is why I would never support RFK Jr.
	from the very beginning. Because he had threatened to arrest the Koch brothers that he disagreed with over this green fraud situation.
	He threatened to throw them in jail.
	Then when he was finally asked about it by somebody else, I had an interview lined up with him, and he canceled it at the last minute for some reason and would not reschedule.
	But when somebody else asked him about that, he hedged, and he said, well, I was talking about the corporation they run.
	I wasn't talking about it. Well, you don't give a corporation three hot meals and a bed, which is what he was saying.
	He was asked, is Biden or Trump?
	A bigger threat to democracy.
	Aaron Burnett asked him this in an interview.
	And so he said, I can make the argument that Biden is a much worse threat to democracy.
	He said because he has weaponized federal agencies, he's used them to censor his political opponent.
	Well, that's absolutely true.
	No question about it. But it seems to me like I remember the CDC and the NIH and all these health departments, state, local, and everything, weaponized with money from the Trump administration.
	I seem to remember censorship from his FDA over things like ivermectin.
	They still have not, even though they lost in court, they've still not taken down that tweet.
	Hey, y'all, get over this ivermectin thing.
	That's for horses, y'all.
	They still haven't taken that down.
	All that stuff happened. You had people losing their license to practice pharmacy or as a medical professional doctor or something like that because they prescribed HCQ or ivermectin.
	Trump didn't give that to anybody.
	Oh, he gave us the free masks and the free PCR tests and he pumped out, he and Peter Navarro pumped out ventilators to kill people and remdesivir and other things like that.
	They were showering all that stuff.
	But no, we're not going to defend the people who are acting as doctors and using their free speech.
	We're not going to protect them.
	On the ivermectin HCQ front.
	And we're not even going to manufacture that very cheap drug because it's in public domain and give that out free to people.
	Like we give out the mask and the PCR test and all the rest of this nonsense.
	And the jabs. No, not going to do that.
	RFK Jr. said, no president in our country has ever done that.
	He says, 37 hours after he took the oath of office, he was censoring me.
	Well, that was being done under the Trump administration as well.
	Because, see, Trump was working for the same deep state.
	He was controlled by the same deep state, by the CIA, by the health bureaucracies and everything.
	Same people that were running Biden.
	Your vote doesn't matter for president, folks.
	The greatest threat to democracy is not somebody who questions election returns, but a president of the United States who uses the power of his office to force social media companies, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, to open a portal and to give access of that portal to the FBI, the CIA, the IRS, CISA, NIH to censor his political critics.
	Well, that was happening under Trump as well.
	I know, because I was censored under Trump.
	And that was before even the COVID stuff began.
	But Burnett continued to press him.
	She said, Trump of course tried to overturn a free and fair election.
	How is that not a threat to democracy again?
	He says, but the question was, who is the worst threat to democracy?
	And I would still say, I'm not going to answer that question, but I can argue that Biden is because the First Amendment, Aaron, is the most important.
	Adams and Hamilton and Madison said, we put the guarantee of freedom of expression in the First Amendment because all of our other constitutional rights depend on it.
	If you have a government that can silence its opponents, it has a license for any atrocity.
	So just to be clear, you're saying that you could make an argument that Biden is a worse threat to democracy than Trump?
	He said, absolutely.
	Well, again, the big threat to America was everything that happened from 2020 on.
	And they were both doing the same thing.
	And they were both subservient to the deep state, which is supposed to be under them, but has taken over the presidency, primarily because it's the CIA that's running this country.
	So far, Kennedy is qualified to appear on the ballot in five states, the latest one being North Carolina.
	Let me just say before I take a break here, on Rockfin, we got some comments about what I was talking about earlier with the D.A.R.E. program and other things like that.
	On Rockfin, Audi, Modern Retro Radio, thank you very much for the tip.
	Good to see you there. He says, there's not a doubt in my mind that police are the standing army that the forefathers warned us about.
	I absolutely agree with that.
	And the militarization of it, the parading of them, and the subway is the most recent example of the escalation, taking it to the next level.
	I absolutely agree with that.
	And if you look at the number of police officers that we have in this country, it's bigger than any military in the world, except for the U.S. and Chinese military.
	And I don't know about Russia now that they've called up their reserves, but that was before that war.
	I looked at it, and it was the number of police we have in this country is an army, an army.
	He says they are literally domestic terrorists.
	They also recruit citizens to their target program.
	I agree. On Rockfin, Amos Poole, thank you for the tip.
	He says, remember the scared straight program that take kids to prison to be terrorized?
	I mean, educated by the inmates?
	Yeah, I remember that. And on Rock Fan, Eric, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that. Well, before we take a break, I talked about this the other day.
	You know, over the weekend, I saw all of this stuff.
	Look at this. Biden has banned any religious...
	Artwork or anything on these Easter eggs that they're decorating.
	I'm going to have an Easter egg hunt and roll on the White House lawn.
	Isn't that horrible? And that was picked up and run by all of the conservative media.
	And when I talked about it on Monday, I said, do you realize that this is a program that has gone back to 1978?
	It was Jimmy Carter who instituted it.
	Shame on him for doing that, quite frankly.
	That is not the establishment of religion.
	That is the free exercise of religion.
	People should be able to draw whatever they want to.
	It doesn't become some sacred ground because it is the White House lawn, and they are hardly established.
	I don't know what religion you think they're establishing.
	What religion is it that says that you're going to draw religious symbols on an Easter egg and roll them on the ground?
	What denomination of Christianity is that, Travis?
	I don't know. I have no idea.
	The rollers, I guess.
	But what a joke.
	That's how severe, in the middle of the 20th century, they became about suppressing any free exercise of people's religious beliefs anywhere around the government.
	Oh, government's got to be a complete religion-free zone.
	Since when? It never was.
	Anyway, it went back to 1978.
	As I pointed out, that means that Reagan did it.
	That means both of the Bushes did it.
	That means that Clinton and Obama did it, and it means that Trump did it as well.
	And so the Daily Caller put out the story, and then they corrected it on Tuesday.
	And the White House said, thank you for retracting that.
	Everybody else has put this thing out, so false claims.
	We'll just leave it at that, that you did the right thing by retracting it.
	Look, anybody can make a mistake, and the media can become an echo chamber.
	But nobody else has retracted that.
	They put it out, they did it for their political side, and they're going to leave it at that.
	I think it's important to tell the truth, even if it doesn't work out for our side, whatever our side is.
	But then, as a part of this article from The Hill, they show their bias.
	They said, the Transgender Day of Visibility always falls on March 31st.
	That is true, but it's not the holy truth.
	It's not the whole truth, and it's not the holy truth either.
	Easter moves around, but the trends day of visibility always falls on the 31st.
	However, this year, he made a special point of doing a proclamation, a special proclamation, and that's what's different about it.
	So we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, I've got some news about Pharmaceutical stuff that I think you're going to find very interesting.
	So we will be right back.
	Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
	From country to blues, classic hits to news, APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
	Get details at APSradio.com.
	♪♪♪ ♪♪♪ This is the end of the video. Thank you for watching!
	I hope you enjoyed this video. If you did, please leave a like and subscribe!
	I hope you enjoyed this video. If you did, please leave a like and subscribe!
	I hope you enjoyed this video. If you did, please leave a like and subscribe!
	I hope you enjoyed this video. If you did, please leave a like and subscribe!
	I hope you enjoyed this video. If you did, please leave a like and subscribe!
	I hope you enjoyed this video. If you did, please leave a like and subscribe!
	I hope you enjoyed this video. If you did, please leave a like and subscribe!
	I hope you enjoyed this video. If you did, please leave a like and subscribe!
	I hope you enjoyed this video. If you did, please leave a like and subscribe!
	Thank you. You're listening to The David
	Knight Show. Well, we've had Tennessee lawmakers have passed a bill targeting mRNA vaccines in food.
	I've mentioned this briefly before, but this bill has now passed in the Senate 23 to 6, and the House have passed 73 to 22, pretty much along partisan lines, interestingly enough.
	The Democrats would like to have mRNA vaccines in your lettuce and other things.
	You know, from the very beginning, I called this mRNA jab the genetic code injection.
	I even called it the GCI. I used the term so many times, I just shortened it to the GCI. Well, the bill comes in response to the University of California Riverside research project looking into whether mRNA, which targets pathogens, could be implanted into edible plants, which would then be consumed.
	So, Republican State Representative who is pushing this through, Scott Sapicki, I guess is how you pronounce his last name.
	During a House committee meeting where they interrogate people about their bill, you know, they present the bill and people can ask them questions in committee meetings.
	He said, you'd have to get a prescription for that to make sure that we know how much of the lettuce you have to eat based off of your body type.
	So, if we just dump in, and this is very analogous to the fluoride thing, right?
	If we just dump in fluoride, and it's a particular type of fluoride.
	This is a fluoride that is an industrial byproduct of both the aluminum and the nuclear industry.
	And they would normally use that, as they do in China, as a pesticide.
	That's a rat poison.
	And they would have to very carefully dispose of that, except that they offered it as not a bug, but a feature.
	And they sell it to municipal water systems, and they put it in the water.
	And it's supposed to help your teeth.
	I guess at that point in time, they realized they could sell us anything, including mRNA injections, if we got the right person in charge.
	If you swallow that stuff, you'll swallow anything, right?
	But mainly it's a conspiracy of silence.
	And so, but the question is the same, right?
	If they're going to put mRNA stuff in lettuce, then how much lettuce do you get to have the right dosage?
	And if they're going to put fluoride in the water, How much water should you drink in order to get the right dosage?
	Is it going to be uniformly distributed?
	Maybe not if you just dump it into the water supply.
	Why would you ever medicate the population by dumping something into the water supply regardless of whether fluoride is good or bad?
	Even if it were good.
	Dumping it into the water supply would be unbelievable in terms of negligence.
	And what dosage is a child going to get versus a tiny baby versus a grown man?
	You can't control any of that stuff.
	So he uses that same argument.
	He doesn't talk about fluoride.
	But he says, how much of the lettuce would you have to eat based off your body type and weight?
	So that we don't under-vaccinate you, which leads to the possibility of the efficacy of the drug being compromised, or if we overdose you based on how much lettuce is eaten, or how much water you drink with a fluoride in it.
	He said the bill, which local media described as a move targeting vaccine lettuce, quote-unquote, would classify foods modified to act as vaccines.
	It would classify them as pharmaceuticals.
	Maybe we should classify our water as a pharmaceutical.
	Our municipal water has got fluoride in it.
	Isn't that amazing?
	First of all, don't talk about it.
	If you happen to notice the absurdity of medicating people through food and through the water supply, you're the crazy person.
	You're the crazy. You're the conspiracy.
	No, you're actually putting that stuff in.
	And you want me to believe that you got the dosage correct for everybody?
	There's absolutely no way that that passes any kind of logic.
	But I'm the crazy person, not you, right?
	In 2021, press release, University of California Riverside Associate Professor of Botany and Plant Sciences, Juan Pablo, said, We are testing this approach with spinach and lettuce, and we have long-term goals of people growing it in their own gardens.
	Farmers could also eventually grow entire fields of it.
	Because there's nothing better for your body than mRNA.
	Whatever it is. I mean, we just need more of it.
	It's like they put folic acid in food or something like that.
	We just need more mRNA everywhere.
	It's so wonderful to have it.
	He says, so we need to know about this.
	We need to treat it as a pharmaceutical.
	So if you want to consume this, you'd have to go to the doctor and get a prescription for your lettuce.
	But according to Pablo at the University of California where they're trying to create this, or have created it, who knows, he said ideally a single plant would produce enough mRNA to vaccinate a single person.
	Ideally? You don't know?
	Or you don't care? And really, they don't care about dosage.
	They don't care about dosage with fluoride in the water, and they don't care about dosage with their mRNA stuff either.
	Because we found that it varied from 3 to 100.
	It varied by a factor of 33 times.
	That's why you got certain lots where it was 100, and I think it's micrograms, of active ingredient, where that's where all the fatalities and injuries were.
	See, we were all lab rats for them.
	And that's why they wanted to track the lot number, because they knew which ones were 3 micrograms and which ones were 100 micrograms.
	Another researcher, Nicole Steinmetz, said in the same release that they plan to use nanoparticles or plant viruses for gene delivery.
	So one of the Democrats opposed this.
	Fortunately, there's not that many of them here in Tennessee.
	When they had the floor debate in the Senate, Heidi Campbell asked, does the sponsor know of any instances of there being food offered in the state of Tennessee that contains vaccines in some kind of a retail or public form?
	And you know... That begs the issue.
	We know about technology that's coming.
	We know the threats of the technology.
	Shouldn't we be proactive in it?
	I mean, isn't that what people are talking about with AI? Saying, you know, we can see where this thing is headed.
	We need to try to at least put in some prohibitions against this.
	Why wouldn't you do that?
	So Representative Sepeke hit back.
	He said, well, in February, we had a Kentucky company that had already been infecting growing tobacco plants with a genetically modified coronavirus to see if it can produce antibodies for a potential vaccine, adding that the company, quote, can already do this right now.
	You know, they have used, for whatever reason, I don't know why the tobacco plant is the go-to plant for genetic modification.
	GMO stuff. They always go to tobacco first.
	Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
	And so here they are, you know, with their GMO vaccines.
	In 2023, Thomas Massey from Kentucky raised concerns over the use of federal money to create transgenic edible vaccines.
	He said to transform edible plants such as spinach and lettuce into mRNA vaccine delivery vehicles.
	He says, I think it is dangerous to play God with our food, he said back in September last year.
	There is a push to create edible vaccines, food products like tomatoes, lettuce, or milk that are genetically modified to have the effect of a vaccination when someone consumes them.
	Now, why are we doing that?
	And why are the Democrats so supportive of that?
	In September 2023, during a debate over an appropriations bill, Massey highlighted an incident in which an edible vaccine was introduced into a corn crop used to feed pigs in order to mitigate diarrhea.
	That could be a big problem with pigs.
	I mean, this is something we've got to do something about, but maybe not this.
	The corn crop, however, became commingled with a soybean crop.
	Contaminating 500,000 bushels that had to be recalled.
	And so he said, do we really want to have humans eating vaccines that were grown in corn meant to stop pigs from getting diarrhea?
	I don't think we want that to happen.
	Yet, that almost happened.
	And it could happen.
	And there's another case where pollen cross-contaminated another crop of corn, and 155 acres of corn had to be burned.
	What are the cases where we're not discovering this?
	He said, I think it's dangerous to play God with our food and with our medicine.
	And with other things.
	Here's a place where they're playing God, and this is in Portugal.
	They're doing some genetic modification.
	How an accidental six-legged mouse...
	Could one day help fight cancer.
	Now, it's interesting. They call this little mouse fetus, they call it a mouse.
	They never say that it's anything other than a mouse, really, in this.
	But it is far from being developed enough to survive on the outside, and yet they treat it as if it were a mouse.
	Scientists accidentally created a mouse embryo with six legs and no genitals.
	I guess that's what they'd like to do with us.
	If they could keep us from reproducing and get us to grow two extra legs instead, we could be their cattle for sure, I guess, as they got their goal of depopulation and treating us as literal cattle with four legs.
	Revealing how changes to DNA can have major impacts on development.
	Oh, yeah. We don't need to worry about that, right?
	We're just going to genetically modify the food, the tobacco, corn, all these other things.
	We don't have to worry about it actually having any blowback effects.
	They were very surprised by this, actually.
	The team in Portugal were investigating how a particular protein works during the middle stages of embryo growth.
	Well, they do refer to it as an embryo.
	They begin as a bundle of identical cells as they develop.
	Cells specialize, begin to form different body parts.
	Did you show the picture of the mouse that's on the article there?
	They have a normal mouse at that stage of development, and this Frankenstein thing.
	Generally starting at the head and moving backward toward the tail.
	And this article says, yes, even humans have tails in the early days, but they disappear around eight weeks.
	No, this is a harken back to Ernst Heckel, going back to the 1800s.
	He tried, he was Darwin's bulldog.
	He was a Darwin fanboy, just like Carl Sagan.
	And Ernst Heckel faked a bunch of drawings about developmental stages between humans.
	And he said, look at this. You know, at this stage, it's a single-cell thing, and then it becomes like a fish, and then it becomes like a land animal, and all these different land animals.
	So it's going through all this stuff, and he would say, this is recapitulation theory, that ontogeny would recapitulate phylogeny.
	In other words, they're going through evolution right there in their development.
	No, they're not. No, they're not.
	And that was pushed by everybody until they actually got pictures of it and people started doing the real stuff.
	At first, everybody took that as being real, but he was exposed as a fraud in the early 20th century.
	And yet, by the mid-20th century, you still have people like Carl Sagan going on Johnny Carson billions and billions of years.
	And he loved to say, well, you know, Johnny, evolution, we can see it.
	You know, it's got ontogeny, recapitulating phylogeny.
	And Johnny Carson would go, wow.
	Wow, this guy's so smart.
	Listen to all those syllables that he's got there.
	And this whole thing was a fraud.
	And if Carl Sagan was educated or honest, he would know that it was a fraud.
	But they still put it in a lot of kids' school books here.
	It's all this stuff about a tale and all the rest of the stuff.
	This is just a bunch of Darwin fanboys that are still pushing, beating this dead theory of molecules to man evolution.
	Anyway, what they did was they stepped into this process and they started modifying proteins.
	Researchers inactivated a protein they called TGFBR1. And a mouse embryo is roughly halfway through their development to see how it affected development of the spinal cord.
	And they said what they found was that it caused the mouse to develop extra limbs.
	Instead of genitals.
	And then it had a number of organs growing on the outside of its body.
	Oh, that's great.
	That's, you know, you start messing around with something you don't understand, which is the DNA code.
	They don't understand it. When they went through it, they said, oh, we sequenced the human genome, and we sequenced the mouse genome.
	And you know what's interesting? About half of that stuff is junk.
	It doesn't have any purpose at all.
	Well, maybe it does, and maybe you don't understand what the purpose is.
	Francis Collins, that's what he did before.
	They put him as the head of the NIH. Anyway, it wasn't what the team was expecting, they said.
	But they now hope further research will enable them to determine whether they can use this to affect other systems, such as metastatic cancer.
	Now, why would you make that leap?
	You go in and you mess and you block a protein, you do some genetic modification, and all of a sudden, the animal has two extra legs, no genitals, and it's growing organs on the outside of the body.
	Ah, this could be a breakthrough to treat cancer.
	Absolute total nonsense.
	They don't have any reason to say that.
	What does it matter with these people?
	Well, it's Metro in the UK. So it's one of these, you know, clickbait publications.
	But these people are jumping to this day, well, you know, it might help us with metastatic cancer, late-stage cancer even.
	They have no reason to say that.
	None whatsoever. But, you know, may cause it.
	Why would they say that?
	Well, because whenever you talk about genetic modification or you talk about your vaccines, oh, we could use this to cure cancer.
	And they have absolutely no reason to say that.
	You know, Moderna, which they used to pronounce as mode RNA, because from the very beginning it was about mRNA.
	And for 10 years, before Trump gave them this gift of tens of billions of dollars to produce this stuff, for 10 years, they said, well, you know, we're going to cure cancer, we're going to do this, and we're going to do that.
	And they would hold a press conference for Wall Street investors, and they would feed them these stories of massive piles of hopium, and their stock would go straight up.
	And these guys would make their money by, you know, trading on when they give people these happy stories about this miracle drug that they're going to have.
	And, you know, make money off of that.
	And then when it didn't pan out and the stock fell, well, we come up with another piece of opium.
	And they did that for 10 years.
	That's what this is. And then they say in this article, existing cancer treatments already target tumors' DNA, meaning better understanding of how they work could help to create new and better options.
	Yeah, right. At the same time, we've got a diabetes jab that they're out there selling.
	$935 for the jab.
	It costs them less than $5 to make.
	It's always been about the money.
	They will kill you and your family for money.
	Never forget that with these people.
	We'll be right back. Using free speech to free minds.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	Well, real quickly, it's kind of interesting what is happening in the financial markets, isn't it?
	The interest rates are, you know, as predicted by all of us, especially Gerald Salenti.
	I guess we should have gotten more specific about exactly which month we could have had between Tony and me and Gerald.
	You know, we could have all picked a month and had sweepstakes or something like that.
	But it's a given that they're going to do it in election year, and it's a given that it's going to be pretty soon.
	So as a result, even though Bitcoin is jumping around and everything very volatile, gold is steadily going up.
	Hitting new records, another record.
	This is as of yesterday.
	Gold was up just under 3% for the week, 2.7%.
	For the month, it was up 9%.
	For the quarter, it was up 8%.
	It was around $2,257 at that point.
	I haven't looked at its price today.
	But it has, as we've always pointed out when I talk to Tony Arterman, it's always got an inverse relationship with interest rates.
	As one goes up, the other one goes down.
	Because what we're talking about is inflation, and it is the hedge against inflation.
	As I mentioned briefly the other day, Utah has formally empowered the state treasurer there to protect state funds from the ravages of inflation or the moves by the Federal Reserve to undermine the financial system in other ways, to protect the state funds from With gold and silver.
	And the Utah governor has now signed that legislation.
	It was introduced by a guy who, Ken Ivery, I've interviewed him in terms of things that he's put in to put restrictions on the government ownership of land and other things like that.
	But he has done a couple of bills to try to help the government to get into gold and to have a backup to this fiat currency.
	Ken Ivery, his bill would permit but not require the treasurer to hold up to 10% of certain state reserve accounts in gold and silver to help secure state assets against the risks of inflation, financial turmoil, and or achieve capital gains measured against federal reserve notes.
	The same thing has been done here in Tennessee by Senator Nicely and it has not been signed into law yet here in Tennessee but there are several states that have done this.
	If your state's not doing it, you need to get ahold of these guys and ask why.
	Besides Utah, which just had the governor sign it, and Tennessee, where it has not been signed yet, there's also Missouri, Idaho, and West Virginia.
	Bills that would allow the state government to start to move some of their funds out of corporate bonds and things like that and into gold and silver if they have the option to do that, if the treasurer wants to do that.
	And so it was backed by the Sound Money Defense League and the Money Metals Exchange and other in-state advocates.
	So if this isn't happening in your state, Look up the Sound Money Defense League and see what you can do to try to get the ball rolling.
	Maybe they can identify somebody in your state like Ken Ivory or Frank Nicely here in Tennessee.
	By allowing the state treasurer to invest in monetary metals, Utah is better equipped to protect Utah taxpayer funds and the residents of Utah.
	That's a description of the Fed fiat currency.
	An allocation to physical gold and silver helps to protect Utah's state funds against financial risk.
	And would be logically included in a list of safe investment options.
	So again, they would have options for that.
	Ivory was also involved in the Utah Legal Tender Act, where they have made some moves.
	And so, you know, there's always going to be a few people in the state government that are going to understand that.
	And what you need to understand, as it was put in by Technocracy News, I like this headline here.
	This is absolutely true. Technocracy depends on the digitalization of money.
	Global governance depends on that.
	So much of it depends on that.
	That is a key move.
	So try to stay out of that as much as you can.
	And as you see this being done by some wise members in some states, and some states are wise enough to do this, that's exactly the same type of thing that you should be doing on an individual basis.
	Again, Tony Arden has set up davidknight.gold, and you can buy any amount.
	He can secure any amount for you, small or large, of gold and silver.
	You can also acquire it on a regular basis with his Wolfpack.
	That allows you to get, as a group, to get a better price in terms of buying it.
	And there's other fringe benefits there if you look at that.
	But you can also set up your IRA or transfer your IRA into gold and silver.
	Some or all of it. And he can help you with that as well.
	So again, just go to davidknight.gold and Tony will know that you're coming from here.
	Tony has always been a big supporter of this program.
	We really do appreciate what he does.
	Gold is not just a hedge against the inflation stuff.
	It's really, as I look at it, is a hedge against CBDC. And it's a way of preserving your financial transactional privacy, as Catherine Austin Fitz puts it.
	You know, during remarks in New Hampshire, we had Trump saying he would never allow the creation of CBDC. Do you really believe that?
	Makes a lot of promises, doesn't he?
	All politicians do. Read my lips.
	No new taxes. We're going to build the wall, all the rest of the stuff.
	I will never allow CBDC. And yet, it kicked off in his administration.
	With his treasury secretary, Steve Mnuchin, his Goldman Sachs guy, and his son-in-law, they kicked it off.
	So, quite frankly, I don't believe any of that.
	What did Trump do to help commercial real estate?
	Nothing really, actually.
	And so that is melting down as we're seeing the affordability of residential real estate becoming unaffordable because the prices just keep going up.
	With everybody. If you're not in it now, it's going to be really hard for the younger generation to get into it.
	But the meltdown of commercial real estate is going to melt down the banking industry as well, outside of the too-big-to-fail banks.
	Isn't that interesting? How this always seems to work out, whether it's Republicans or Democrats.
	They just keep concentrating everything into the hands of a few people.
	That's all the time we have for today.
	Thank you for joining us. Have a good day.
	Let me tell you, the David Knight Show you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	Ha ha ha! And you want to know something else?

▲