Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 2, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:41

The David Knight Show - 04/02/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds Soon.
	You're listening to The David Night Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 2nd of April, Year of Our Lord 2024.
	Well, we have some updates, really, on April Fool's.
	We've had one writer who follows vaccines actually put up an April Fool's joke about it.
	It went viral. Talking about what the FDA could have and should have done, but, of course, they'll never do.
	People believed it. And on April Fool's Day, we had Biden saying that he'd been fooled.
	He didn't know anything about that transgender day of visibility, he said.
	So that raises a lot of questions.
	We're going to talk about all of those as well as new information about the squatters.
	Those squatters, those wonderful squatters who rushed the border, rushed the National Guard, they've now been released on their own recognizance.
	By a judge, because that's what this is really about.
	We'll be right back. Stay with us.
	♪♪♪ Well, Rebecca Barnett talks about her April Fool's tweet that went viral.
	And she had already been essentially shadow banned on Twitter.
	But this went viral nevertheless.
	And it was about the government doing the right thing about the vaccines.
	Breaking. The Australian government has recalled an mRNA, Pfizer, and Moderna vaccines and promised compensation to all Australians for For human rights abuses incurred by illegal lockdowns and vaccine mandates.
	Now she assumed that everybody would think that that was an absurd April Fool's joke.
	Because of course the Australian government, the American government would never do anything like that.
	They would never apologize for lockdowns.
	They would never do anything to compensate victims of their poison and their policies.
	And yet being in Australia, that's where the day begins.
	And so she got a head start on April Fool's.
	And so a lot of people believe this.
	She said, on Easter Monday, I opened my laptop to prepare for a Zoom call, and I checked to fill a few minutes, and noticed the date was April Fool's.
	She said, so I thought to myself, what's the most outlandish thing I can type?
	And that's what she did. Well, the Australian government has recalled all of these mRNA shots from both Pfizer and Moderna.
	Going to compensate people for what it did to them?
	She says, as if the government would ever do such a thing, would ever do the right thing, if it would ever admit error without being absolutely forced.
	So she said, I hit post and I got myself a coffee and jumped onto a Zoom call.
	When I reopened X about an hour later, she said, the first thing I noticed was a slew of comments calling out the date of April Fool's.
	But there were a handful of commenters who took it literally, some who were quite offended, thinking my jab at the government was aimed at the vaccine injured.
	Nothing could be further from the truth, but context collapses on the internet, so I clarified.
	Number one, it's the first of April in Australia.
	Number two, the point of this was to bring attention to what the government should do.
	But they protect pharma, not people.
	And number three, the government is the joke.
	But you should have known, as a writer, that Snopes has gotten onto Babylon Bee.
	Snopes and all of these fact-checkers have come after Babylon Bee.
	They've been attacked by the Daily Beast.
	They've been attacked by the ADL and all the rest of it.
	As a matter of fact, those people attacked me.
	For talking about a Babylon Bee joke.
	Years and years ago, when Elizabeth Warren was running for president, and everybody was making fun of Focahontas and her made-up Indian ancestry that she used to get a job,
	but she had her DNA test And it showed, I forget exactly what the numbers were, but it was something like she was several times less Native American DNA in her blood than the average white person in America.
	Not the average white man, that's Scottish, that group from the 70s.
	No, she had essentially less than most white people in America in terms of Indian DNA. And so what the Babylon Bee did was they took that and added a little bit of a twist to it.
	They said Hillary Clinton has a test and it turns out that she's only 0.5% alien lizard DNA or something like that.
	And I did that and I put that up as a title to a video that I put out and I got attacked.
	By the Daily Beast, I think it was, one of those rags attacked me as a wild-eyed conspiracy theorist.
	I was like, well, I think you're the wild-eyed conspiracy theorist.
	Can't take a joke. And so she realized that they can't take a joke.
	They don't have a sense of humor, these people who are the self-appointed truth guarders.
	I also hadn't expected the post to get so many views as my account has been suppressed since last June.
	Is that all? And she points out, speech not reach.
	I just call it shadow banning.
	But yeah, they leave you on, you've got speech, but nobody can see you.
	Isn't that nice? If I shout, murder by vaccine in the forest, and nobody hears me, do I have free speech?
	And this is very much like the visuals.
	One of the first things I reported on when I went to Infowars was how for the longest time, both the RNC and the DNC would allow free speech.
	At their presidential conventions, right?
	But it was in a cage that was many, many blocks away from the entrance.
	But hey, you know, if you want to, we'll even give you a microphone.
	How about that? You know, just like Twitter will give you an account.
	The RNC and the DNC would give you a microphone.
	They'd give you a soapbox to stand on, and you could go stand in a cage many blocks away from where anybody was, and you could just say whatever you wanted to.
	Isn't that great? That's free speech.
	Or like at the Bundy Ranch, where they, out in the middle of nowhere, middle of nowhere, we couldn't see anything for miles and miles, they put up a little area, says, free speech area, at the Bundy Ranch protest.
	Somebody put up a sign that said, free speech is not an area.
	Well, that's what it is on social media.
	But anyway, she said, I returned mid-afternoon, refreshed my browser.
	The post had been shared over 1,000 times, had been viewed over 150,000 times.
	She said, most people got the point and commented about how good it would be to have a government that put people before pharmaceutical companies and profits.
	I agreed and I linked to a COVID vaccine injury class action where people can donate to force the issue with government.
	Not that anybody should have to do this, but here we are in reality.
	And so she says, I guess the reality is that we really can't do satire on the internet.
	Well, the problem is that, again, totalitarian dictators...
	And the people who are beginning to act like them on social media don't have a sense of humor.
	They're famous for being humorless.
	Did you ever see Mao or Stalin or these guys laugh?
	You ever see these guys laugh? They don't laugh.
	But this is not satire, unfortunately.
	The USDA has approved mRNA vaccines for swine for commercial use.
	That should be satire.
	But it's not. So this is something that is produced by Merck, and they got their license approval for using the vaccine from the USDA back in 2022.
	Now they've approved it for commercial use.
	You know, this is the USDA. But of course, the FDA, and again, how do they split this?
	The FDA is Food and Drugs Administration, right?
	But when it comes to meat, the USDA gets to have that.
	They've worked out this treaty between the two little bureaucratic empires, I guess.
	But, you know, maybe we ought to just combine them and reduce some of the overheads.
	Because it's food and drugs, right?
	And so I think they could also just combine it, and they could rename the FDA the FAD, food as drugs.
	That's what they're doing here.
	They've got a swine flu vaccine.
	They're sticking in the swine.
	Actually, I like that acronym as well, FAD, because that kind of describes how they react to all these pharmaceutical schemes.
	Whatever FAD you've got, well, rubber stamp it.
	No problem at all.
	As we talk about what happened in 2020, one of the key things that people really don't point out Is the number of people that died in 2020 from the hospital death protocol pushed by the Trump administration.
	Fauci, Birx, and rubber stamped by Donald Trump.
	The ventilators, remdesivir, denying treatment to people, do not resuscitate, all the rest of this stuff, right?
	And then, you know, rewarding the hospitals, paying them unbelievable amounts of money.
	As a bribe. And then when Biden came in, he said, all right, now you're going to vaccinate yourself.
	You're going to vaccinate yourself and vaccinate your employees, or we're going to cut off that gravy train.
	Not only are we going to cut off those bonuses that you've been feeding off of for the last year, we're going to cut off all Medicare and Medicaid, which is the bulk of their business.
	And so in Prague, You have a hospital that gets a couple of patients mixed up.
	Now, we've seen this type of thing in America.
	There have been cases, there was one in Florida a couple of years ago, that's not the only one, where somebody is there to have a limb amputated and they get the wrong patient.
	This has happened more than once.
	In this particular case, the hospital in Prague did an abortion on the wrong pregnant woman.
	And so they described this.
	She went in for a routine checkup.
	Instead, what they did is they gave her an abortion.
	They described it, the hospital spokeswoman described it as an adverse event.
	Yeah, yeah, that's kind of like the people had their lives aborted with the vaccines, the poison, based on aborted babies, isn't it?
	And this caught my eye.
	This is a nurse.
	Actually, this was sent to me by Harry Hound.
	She says, my name is Lindsay.
	I'm an RN. Here's my updated stat sheet and story of my vaccine injury.
	I survived the bioweapon.
	I am a RN mandated to get injected.
	And I am confirmed, documented, and diagnosed as vaccine injured by three different health providers.
	And she goes over a long list of ailments that she now has.
	But she says, now I have a quality of life that is like that of a cancer or a CHFPT. She said, my career as a nurse is gone.
	I can't stand up longer than 20 minutes some days and I can't do activities of daily living such as bathing, chores, cooking, laundry, etc.
	I'm now childless and unable to have a baby.
	I've seen this over and over again, and so have you.
	People who were coerced into taking this because they were going to be fired, lose their career.
	As a matter of fact, I remember interviewing three police officers who had that situation.
	One of the guys, the most severe, cannot work anymore.
	The others are blackballed.
	But people did it to save their job, and they wound up as dependent invalids.
	But the U.S. has recorded over 1 million excess deaths of people over the age of 65.
	Well, that's one way to handle the looming Social Security indebtedness, entitlements of the baby boomers, isn't it?
	You can just kill them. That helps a lot, doesn't it?
	They dealt with a Social Security problem.
	The CDC reveals that over 1 million excess deaths have been recorded amongst people aged 65 and over since the FDA gave its emergency use authorization.
	Now remember, Trump brags about how he fought them to do it faster and faster and faster than even they wanted to do.
	But he would not push them on HCQ or ivermectin.
	He brags about pushing them on the vaccine.
	But he's silent about why he didn't push them on ACQ or ivermectin.
	He's silent about why he wouldn't give that out for free as he gave out the PCR tests for free.
	Well, we know why they gave out the PCR tests.
	They wanted to create a pretend pandemic.
	And so the media is now even talking about soaring cancer rates among the vaccinated.
	Now, this is coming from Slay News.
	I talked about this last week, but when I talked about it last week, I pointed out that they look at their statistics and they talk about how it's increased, but they stop it at 2019.
	I'd like to see what happened since then.
	Because even though there's been a huge increase in this, and people are talking about it a great deal, even about abdominal cancer, which Kate Middleton, Princess Kate or whatever has, they talk about that, but they leave it up to 2019.
	Why do they stop there?
	Did they not have data for the last five years?
	Or could it be that even though it has grown rapidly, Up to 2019.
	Perhaps it has exploded exponentially in the last five years and they don't want to talk about it.
	You think? That's what I suspect.
	That it has gone up tremendously.
	These so-called excess deaths from cancer.
	Now, we're not talking about the million excess deaths of people over 65 that they targeted with this bioweapon, with a shot.
	But these so-called excess deaths, 298,000 in 2023, have all but been ignored in a milieu that relax the political will to investigate pandemic policies and their aftermath.
	Well, that's all partisan stuff.
	It is the amazing thing to me.
	Is that this was a bipartisan operation.
	Republicans is heavily into it, if not more so than the Democrats even.
	And I say more so because Trump had the administrations putting the stuff out, but the Democrats are saying more, more.
	But they all did it.
	And they all had a hand in it.
	And they all funded it. And they all told us to put on masks and stay locked down and all the rest of this stuff.
	And yet... That's what the reality is.
	The reality is that we can see how the politicians are united in all of this.
	And yet, their parties are divided and blaming the other party for what happened.
	And you see it in their media as well.
	Their media, their voters blame the other guy for what happened.
	Whether it's Democrats or Republicans.
	It was all Biden, or it was all Trump, or whatever.
	But they are all united.
	They're not divided at all.
	We're divided. It's amazing, really.
	We cannot shrink from asking what is causing this increase in cancer.
	Well, we did with autism, didn't we?
	And when people came up with some plausible answers, they were purged, canceled.
	There are hints in the medical literature of potential ways that repeated vaccinations might undermine mechanisms of immunity and perhaps even facilitate cancer growth.
	We knew this two months into it.
	Dr. Ryan Cole, pathologist, said, I'm seeing a massive drop in killer T-cells with people who have been vaccinated.
	That's going to result in, amongst many other diseases, An epidemic and cancers coming back, growing faster, and all the rest of this.
	The shift in messaging from the media comes after over three years of reports from corporate outlets that the injections are safe and effective.
	Of course, yeah.
	We need to explore the role of lockdowns, of top-down treatment protocols, and particularly to prime-of-life workers.
	Vaccines were often mandated as a condition of employment.
	Well, we can't, though, because we can't talk about Trump's lockdown stuff.
	We can't talk about his proud creation and release of the bioweapon.
	We can't talk about the fact that he withheld, instead of facilitated, the release of HCQ and ivermectin and other things.
	While they are, he and Peter Navarro, may he rot in jail, pushed out these ventilators to people.
	Pushed out rubber-stamped remdesivir and all the rest of these things.
	And paid the hospitals to literally kill people.
	Can't talk about that.
	That would be bad.
	So a new AI tool is going to be used to predict vaccine hesitancy.
	As I said before, one of the key things about artificial intelligence, I think, is going to be its use as a surveillance tool, as a minder tool.
	It's the worst form of Big Brother.
	Predictive crime.
	Anticipatory intelligence.
	Isn't that interesting? They've talked since the late 90s when they began geospatial intelligence.
	They've talked about anticipatory intelligence.
	Just happens to share the acronym of artificial intelligence, doesn't it?
	They're both AI. And that's what AI is going to...
	Its primary use is going to be anticipatory intelligence.
	To anticipate... And predict what you're going to do, and then for the government to act on it pre-crime, like Minority Report.
	Despite COVID-19 vaccine mandates, many chose to forego vaccination, raising questions about the psychology underlying how judgment affects these choices.
	Now, that's according to the University of Cincinnati Research, who's developed this AI tool.
	There's got to be something strange about you.
	If you refuse to take an experimental genetic code injection, what's your problem?
	You must have some kind of a psychological disorder.
	And in the past, they've even given that a name.
	Odd. You're odd.
	ODD. You have oppositional defiant disorder.
	Yeah, I got that real strong.
	I've had that all my life, I guess.
	Oppositional defiant disorder, and I'm proud of it.
	I'm not going to do whatever you say unless you give me a reason.
	But yeah, informed consent.
	If you want informed consent, you have oppositional defiant disorder.
	You just do what you're told.
	You bow down and kiss my feet.
	Using AI to target the vaccine hesitant.
	COVID-19 is unlikely to be the last pandemic we will see in the next decades, they said.
	So we have to have a new form of AI for prediction in public health that provides valuable tools that could help prepare hospitals for predicting vaccination rates and consequential infection rates.
	Maybe you ought to go back and revisit that model from the Imperial College of London and fix that before you start sticking your artificial intelligence on us.
	But we know that's what they're going to do.
	And we know that they're not done with this.
	This worked. All of this stuff remains in place, again, because the Republicans and the Democrats were both a part of this.
	They have left all of this medical martial law precedent in place.
	And just like cement overshoes, this stuff dried on us a long time ago.
	It's going to be hard to chip it off, but we better start trying.
	The underlying premise is that vaccine hesitancy must be accounted for in terms of the aberrant psychology of the subjects, the people.
	And not with reference to the efficacy and the safety of the vaccines in question.
	That's Michael Rechtenwald, author of Google Archipelago, The Digital Gulag and the Simulation of Freedom.
	He said it's implied that if people are vaccine hesitant, the fault is endemic to them rather than to the vaccine itself.
	But see, this is the character of any critical thinking.
	You've got a problem if you're thinking critically.
	You had too much to think.
	From this premise, the research seeks to justify vaccination as normal by linking anomalous mental and psychological characteristics with vaccine hesitancy.
	Yeah, there you go. Absolutely.
	You are ODD. We'll be right back.
	APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your mobile device.
	Get the APS Radio app today and listen wherever you go.
	Go!
	Get the APS Radio app today and listen wherever you go. go!
	You're welcome.
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back. Let's talk a little bit about a new phenomenon here that we've got.
	Not only do we have Biden with his April Fools.
	I really, really didn't put out that order.
	Or at least he doesn't remember it.
	I don't know which is scarier.
	But we now have a new phenomenon as well.
	And I would call them Christian Nationalist Atheists.
	Richard Dawkins, one of the preeminent atheists, is now talking about his preference for Christian culture.
	We're going to get to that in a moment.
	But take a look at this.
	This has been out by Libs of TikTok.
	As part of the Trans Day of Visibility, you had a transgender who has now been arrested and charged in Portland for burning down this 117-year-old church.
	You had Cameron David Storer was charged with two counts of first-degree arson, one count of second-degree arson, and two counts of second-degree burglary.
	So how's that for visibility?
	Torture a church.
	Well, I guess that works out, and it really is.
	They didn't charge him with a hate crime, interestingly enough, when that happened.
	But Biden saying, I didn't do that.
	Even though his executive order was all over the internet for two days, he finally, I guess, woke up and said, I didn't do that.
	I have no idea how that happened.
	And as Zero Hedge points out, Democrats have spent the better part of the last six months trying to give us the idea that even though he seems goofy and doddering and senile and public, all behind the scenes, he is a well-oiled galaxy brain, as they put it, behind the scenes.
	But evidently, as they said, he can't keep up with his Marxist handlers.
	They understand this is Marxism, and we should all understand this is Marxism.
	That's what LGBT is.
	It is a mal-technique that is being done.
	Case in point, when asked about proclaiming Easter Sunday the trans day of visibility, he flat out denied it.
	I didn't do that.
	He said, when asked about the proclamation with real clear politics, when asked about Speaker Johnson's claim that he had, Biden replied, well, he's thoroughly uninformed.
	Wow. So the question is, who's running the show?
	One person, Ian Miller, said it's hard to figure out which possibility is funnier here, that he had no idea what's being said under his name in proclamations and in public posts, or that he's already forgotten what happened literally yesterday.
	Sir Hedge says, well, is that funnier or scarier that he's in that kind of a situation?
	But in reality, he's very much like Fauci and Trump and the MAGA cult altogether.
	They don't remember what was done under Trump's name.
	They all forget about that, right?
	The emergency executive war, I didn't do that.
	He didn't do any of that stuff.
	It's very much like this proclamation.
	They put this stuff out.
	Using their presumed authority?
	Perhaps what happened with Trump?
	Maybe he really didn't do that executive emergency order.
	Maybe Klaus Schwab signed his name and turned in his homework, you think?
	I, Joseph Biden, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority invested in me by the Constitution.
	Do you know that the Constitution gives them authority to worship transgenders?
	And the law of the United States.
	Do hereby proclaim March the 31st, 2024 as Transgender Day of Visibility.
	It also came with a long commentary about this.
	I am proud that my administration has stood for justice from the start, working to ensure that the LGBTQ community can live openly and safety with dignity and respect.
	I should add, while parents and other people Who live in the real world have to kowtow in obedience to them.
	But this proclamation is filled with I and my administration and all the rest of the stuff.
	So, who's writing this stuff?
	Or does he not know?
	Does he not remember? Biden also comes out and tells trans-Americans...
	That's kind of an interesting name.
	Maybe that's what the next name for the newcomers is going to be, right?
	We'll call them trans-Americans.
	These are people who are not American, but they identify as American.
	And not only that, but they trans-ed the border, didn't they?
	It perfectly fits the trans-Americans.
	I think squatter is a better term, though.
	Trans-Americans made in the image of God.
	Well, all of us are made in the image of God.
	Some of us are marred and mutilated, physically and or spiritually.
	But he says, you are worthy of respect.
	And they are. But not everything they do is worthy of respect.
	You know, the guy Richard LaVine, I call him Dick Devine, That they have given him the title of Admiral.
	He's like Deputy Director of HHS or something.
	And then, you know, given him all kinds of awards as if he were a woman.
	Calling himself Rachel.
	Look, you know, he is somebody who's creating God's image.
	But the image that he projects at this point in time...
	It's not something that we should embrace.
	Perish the thought. But it's not something we should accept.
	Let's just put it that way. And we need to...
	It's not a loving thing to embrace that and to promote that.
	So... He says, Christians recognize the need to suppress anger, forgive, and even love, says the author here of this Breitbart article, and they talk about, you know, we understand that we turn the other cheek and so forth.
	Well, I don't think that's really what's being applied here.
	I think a better approach is what Jude said.
	He said, be merciful to those who doubt.
	Save other people by snatching them from the fire.
	With great caution, hating the sins that contaminate their lives.
	You see? Should we just let people burn?
	Should we? Should we just, you know, you're on your way to hell, just have a nice trip.
	Is that love?
	That's why I read that essay yesterday from Matt Trujillo.
	He says, you know, we have this false idea of love.
	That is not loving.
	That is taking the easy way out.
	That's saying, I love myself more than I love you.
	Because I don't want to have anything.
	I don't want to get criticized.
	I don't want to get canceled.
	I don't want the hate mail.
	I just let you go your own way.
	That's the reality.
	So, it's not loving your neighbor to let them burn.
	And just because you don't want to make them angry or make other people angry.
	That's a cowardly thing, frankly.
	And so you've got Lala Harris, who celebrated Cesar Chavez Day.
	Because on their proclamation that was put in Spanish, they didn't talk about Sunday, March the 31st.
	They didn't talk about it being Transgender Visibility Day for some reason.
	Why do you think that is? You know, the problem that the Democrats have in terms of the Hispanic community is that they're actually much more conservative than Americans are in general.
	And they know that.
	And so they didn't put anything about the Transgender Day in there.
	Instead, they made it about Cesar Chavez Day.
	One person on the Internet responded, It's Easter today, ma'am, just in case you didn't know.
	But you had Donald Trump Jr.
	say, well, it's anything but Easter.
	They'll talk about anything but Easter.
	Easter's nothing, folks.
	It's nothing. They don't want to talk about Jesus.
	And I said, you know, they don't even want to use the term Resurrection Sunday.
	Why? Because they don't want to talk about Jesus.
	That's the reality. And that's the reality of Donald Trump Jr.
	as well as the Democrats.
	You know, Jesus is the reason.
	For the season, but Jesus is the reason for the resurrection as well, right?
	They don't want to talk about that.
	And that includes the Republicans who are out there pushing this stuff.
	Oh, you guys are worshipping your Marxist leaders and you're worshipping the LGBT. And yet, before all this stuff happened, before this Proclamation for Transgender Visibility Day happened, You had the Washington Times and the person who wrote this article, Tim Constantine.
	The title of this article is The Crucifixion of Donald Trump.
	Now, let me say to you that setting up on a pedestal and worshiping transgenders on the same day that everybody else is talking about the resurrection of Christ, to worship the transgenders on Sunday, is that worse?
	Than worshiping Trump and putting him up on a pedestal?
	And that's exactly what this guy does.
	There is idolatry, false religion on both sides of this stuff.
	And what he does, listen to the way that he equivocates Christ with Trump.
	In his time on earth, Christ spent his public days doing good works.
	And so did Trump as well, he says.
	Christ drew big crowds wherever he went.
	So does Trump as well.
	But fear and the hunger for perpetual power led some to eliminate him.
	Oh, well, you know, that fear and hunger for perpetual power, that's something that Trump shares with the people who arrested and crucified Christ, isn't it?
	Uh-oh. Ha, ha, ha.
	Yeah, he says, Donald Trump spent four years of his life as President of the United States after he recounts what he thinks are good works of Jesus.
	He says, Donald Trump and his good works during that time of four years, he enacted policies that built a solid economy.
	He secured America's southern border.
	Did he really? How did it open up so quickly?
	And he appointed three well-qualified justices to the Supreme Court.
	He brought Arabs and Jews together in the Middle East.
	He paid them.
	He paid them to sign an agreement.
	He paid them with our money.
	He didn't close the border.
	Except for the pandemic aspect of it.
	And when it comes to his building a solid economy...
	As David Stockman pointed out in Trump's War Against Capitalism, I interviewed him before that.
	That book was released in January.
	I interviewed him back in December, I think.
	But he said he'd already laid the seeds for disaster.
	And his tax policies and other things that he had done.
	Even before, he went up to the $4 trillion, got people used to universal basic income, crushed and stomped and ground into the dirt.
	All the small mom and pops on Main Street while he threw cash at the Wall Street big box retailers.
	Just disgusting.
	Not to mention the fact that he killed 17 million people worldwide with his shots.
	Destroyed lives, destroyed livelihoods, created trillions in debt, and then the Constitution shredded into confetti.
	But hey, let's equate Donald Trump with Jesus on Easter.
	That's what the conservatives do.
	The liberals worship the trannies.
	The conservatives worship the Trumps.
	Pilot knew better. Letitia James and Judge Arthur Ingeron know better.
	Fannie Willis knows better.
	Jack Smith knows better.
	Yet, like Pilot, their desire to maintain a grasp on political power is greater than their respect for the law.
	Perhaps the biggest remaining question is regardless of how the courtroom crucifixion goes, whether Mr.
	Trump will experience his own political resurrection this November.
	We need to put a stake through the heart of this Trump vampire cult, folks.
	Blasphemy. Pure BS. Bolshevik.
	How dare me criticize the Trump worshippers, right?
	And MSNBC says, how dare these Christians criticize Biden for worshipping the trannies?
	Panel on Morning Joe.
	On Monday, offended by Republican reactions to a White House transgender proclamation overlapping with Easter.
	Did they not know that Joe Biden had nothing to do with that?
	They said Republicans are seizing upon trans issues as like their go-to wedge issue this time around.
	How's that for projection?
	The trannies are the wedge.
	The trannies are the wedge.
	They're the wedge for censorship.
	They're the wedge for tyranny.
	Oh, we've got to have hate speech laws.
	You know, all the rest of this stuff.
	They're using the trainees for that.
	They're not doing this because they want the votes of the trainees.
	The trainees couldn't get people elected dog catcher because there's too few of them.
	They want to use the trainees to delete reality.
	We're way beyond modernism and post-modernism.
	I mean, we're into total la-la land.
	Two plus two equals five.
	And so he says, here's why I think the Republicans so heinously seize on the trans issue, said Deutsch.
	Obviously, the numbers are not there.
	The amount of trans athletes competing with men with women is 0.0001%.
	This is an issue that, oh wait, boys can be girls, girls can be boys.
	That's simplistic.
	I know the world doesn't make any sense to you anymore.
	Get it? He says, you see what's happening?
	Well, I think we do see what is happening.
	I think we understand this is Orwell.
	Plus, Huxley hedonism.
	Described in Brave New World.
	That's what the trainings are about.
	You think that 2 plus 2 equals 4.
	You think that gender is biological.
	Well, I'm going to tell you that 2 plus 2 equals 5 and gender is not biological.
	And you're going to do what I say.
	And we're going to just sit back and enjoy the detachment from reality and the hedonism.
	That's what this is really about.
	It's about Orwell and Huxley.
	So Alyssa Milano said, That is there.
	A brotherly love.
	Phileo, like Philadelphia, right?
	The love of the family is storge.
	And then there is an unconditional love, agape.
	And that's how we are to love people.
	It's not conditional in what they do, but we love them away from a future eternity.
	That is love. To speak the truth to these people. But they don't like the truth.
	As a matter of fact, the DC Cardinal, Wilton Gregory, slammed Joe Biden. He called him a cafeteria Catholic. I like that term.
	That's good. We've got a lot of cafeteria people out there.
	We've got people who are cafeteria Christians, Catholics, evangelicals, whatever.
	And we have cafeteria people in terms of politics, right?
	I'll just forget about this thing over there or whatever.
	Yeah, it's just you pick what you want.
	And so we even have cafeteria atheists now who pick what they like out of Christianity.
	As I mentioned before, that's Richard Dawkins.
	He's really kind of a cafeteria atheist.
	He likes the culture.
	He likes the music.
	He likes some of the rituals, even song and things like that.
	He likes the foundation of Western civilization.
	Things like innocent and proven guilty and due process and free speech and the free exercise of religion.
	He likes those kinds of things.
	And he calls himself a cultural Christian.
	He didn't call himself a cafeteria atheist, but he calls himself a cultural Christian.
	Isn't that interesting?
	The problem is that he loves the loaves and the fishes, but he doesn't love Jesus.
	That's a problem for Richard Dawkins.
	It's something that we see happening in a lot of different ways.
	I think of Ben Shapiro.
	He's kind of a cafeteria Jew.
	He likes the land that he says Moses took the people to the promised land, but he doesn't want to believe that the Red Sea parted.
	He doesn't want to believe that the River Jordan parted either.
	He rejects the miracles and essentially calls Moses a liar.
	But he'll take the land.
	I like that land.
	I'll keep that land. But that Bible miracle stuff, that's just nonsense.
	You know, we'll look at it as a bunch of do this and do that.
	We got some good moral rules and some good ethical rules.
	But, you know, these people are liars and lunatics that gave us these great moral and ethical rules that were the basis of Western civilization.
	And so that's really kind of where Richard Dawkins is as well.
	Kind of like Ben Shapiro.
	They want the blessings of God, but they don't want God.
	And so, Richard Dawkins, he wrote the God delusion.
	I remember talking to my sons about this.
	You know, we used the example.
	I said, well, there's a Dawkins delusion as well, you know.
	I hear that Dawkins has written a book.
	But I've never seen the Dawkins.
	And so I can't say there really is a Dawkins at all, because I've never met him.
	And that's essentially what atheists like Dawkins were doing.
	Well, supposedly there's this book written by God, but I've never met God, so I think that's delusional.
	Well, I think there's a Dawkins delusion, since I've never met him.
	But now the guy has become a Christian nationalist.
	Now, this is not a...
	Weaponized term in the UK yet.
	So we'll see what happens with it.
	We'll have to call Rob Reiner and get his learned opinion as to whether or not Richard Dawkins should be canceled.
	And he had to be very careful about what he said because in the context of these remarks, he was also talking about how afraid he was of Islam.
	Oh, but I don't mean all the Muslims out there.
	You've got to be very, very careful because you don't want to get somebody slashing your throat like they did Salman Rushdie when he criticized Islam.
	Just to kind of prove the point of what he was saying about Islam.
	This is Richard Dawkins talking now.
	I do think that we are a culturally Christian country, and I call myself a cultural Christian.
	I'm not a believer, but there is a distinction between being a believing Christian and being a cultural Christian.
	Yes, isn't that true?
	I've noticed that many times.
	I've come across many, many cultural Christians in churches and other places like that, and a lot of people call themselves evangelicals.
	They never read the Bible.
	They never pray. They don't have really any outward faith.
	They act and look and seem exactly like everybody who says that they're not Christian.
	A cultural Christian.
	He says, I love hymns and Christmas carols.
	We all like Christmas carols, don't we?
	Well, most of us do, I guess.
	Sort of feel at home in the Christian ethos.
	I feel that we are a Christian country." He noted that the number of Christians is declining in the UK, which he said he's very happy with.
	Oh, there you go. He not only wants a Christian country without God, but he wants a Christian country without Christians. How does that work? Is this guy supposed to be a scientist or a philosopher or thinker or whatever? How do you get a Christian country without Christians in it?
	But he said he would lament the loss of cathedrals.
	And other cultural aspects of living in a Christian country.
	Well, that's okay. They can just turn the cathedrals into discotheques and restaurants and things like that.
	Museums. That's what the communists did when they took over countries.
	They turned the cathedrals into museums, right?
	I think it would matter, certainly, if we substituted any other religion, he said.
	That would be truly dreadful.
	When he was pressed on whether he saw the decline in church attendance and the increasing number of Islamic mosques being built across Europe as a problem, he said, yes, I do.
	He said he would have to choose his words very carefully.
	And as Breitbart points out, maybe he's thinking about what happened to Salman Rushdie when he got his throat slit.
	But Dawkins said, if I had to choose between Christianity and Islam, I would choose Christianity every single time.
	It seems to be a fundamentally decent religion that I think Islam is not.
	He said there is an active hostility in the Quran to women.
	That's promoted, I think, promoted by the holy books of Islam.
	I'm not talking about individual Muslims who are quite different, but the doctrines of Islam, the Hadith, the Quran, are fundamentally hostile to women, hostile to gays, and I find that I like to live in a culturally Christian country, although I do not believe a single word of the Christian faith.
	Well, again, to paraphrase what he's...
	I think that Dawkins seems to be a fundamentally decent person, but I don't believe a word of what he says about God.
	I don't even know if he exists.
	I don't even know if Dawkins exists.
	But we'll just assume for the sake of argument that he does.
	And a British writer writing for unheard.com says that we need more cultural Christians like Richard Dawkins.
	Really? We just don't want the real thing, right?
	We don't want people who, you know, cultural Christians, but we don't want people who will lay down their lives for a principle, do we?
	People who really believe it.
	People who will stand up to COVID dictates and mandates to shut down churches.
	We don't want those kind of people.
	They're kind of crazy and extreme.
	They've got oppositional defiant disorder.
	They won't even take the vaccines.
	What's the matter with those people?
	We need some cultural Christians.
	He says, Dawkins, now 83, has once again stated that he regards himself as a cultural Christian.
	This is not a new position.
	But for Dawkins, even in the heyday of the new atheists, he alluded several times to his love of choral evensong and country churchyards and Gothic architecture, what you might call the form of English Christianity rather than the substance.
	T.S. Eliot revuked people like this in his Choruses from the Rock.
	T.S. Eliot said, He says,
	the great cathedrals, the Christmas carols, the enduring liturgical poetry of the Catholic Mass, the Book of Common Prayer were not and could not have been created by half-believers who found Christianity to be merely soothing and comforting.
	He said, all that said, I have a soft spot for cultural Christians.
	And, you know, quite frankly, They seem to be more bold in some ways than people who are professing Christians.
	You know, they'll come out and tackle these issues.
	Whereas a lot of people who profess to be Christians will just remain silent and try to avoid any conflict.
	He said, those who can't quite bring themselves to believe in full...
	Yet still find consolation and moral guidance in the faith are to be commended for their openness and encouraged to think about what it might mean if beauty and truth and joy are real things in the universe, rather than merely illusions created by a collision of atoms.
	What if truth and beauty and joy were so real that one day you'll be able to essentially touch them?
	That's what we hear from some people who have near-death experiences.
	It's not that all those near-death experiences are anything that we base our faith upon.
	But when people look at this, again, you come back to what C.S. Lewis said.
	Well, you like the society that's there?
	Do you think Christianity has given culture and society a lot of gifts?
	And yet you think the man and the people who wrote about the man are liars and lunatics?
	Do you think that's the case?
	How does that fit?
	How is that consistent?
	Maybe he's Lord and not a liar, lunatic.
	Well, we have not just the atheists.
	Oh, one more thing here.
	Yeah, atheists for Christianity.
	This is from the Washington Examiner.
	In terms of Christian nationalism here in America.
	So Dawkins was not asked if he believes the US is a Christian nation, but if he did, he would actually be in the minority here in America.
	According to Pew and a recent poll from them, only 33% of adults consider the US to be a Christian nation, although 45% said it should be. But this is more interesting, I think, in terms of, you know, double think. 64% say the US is not a Christian nation, but a solid majority, 60%, believe that the founders intended the US to be a Christian nation.
	So 64% said it's not, but 60% said it was intended to be a Christian nation by the founders.
	So, this person says, I would really like to ask those who believe our country was founded as a Christian nation, but who now believe that it is not a Christian nation, when exactly that transformation took place?
	What year exactly did the U.S. stop being a Christian nation?
	And maybe what they mean by that is that people have walked away from it.
	Or maybe they believe that the principles no longer apply.
	But it's not just a guy who sold atheism who now says he likes the Christian culture and who is speaking out against some of this insanity.
	We now have An author who made billions of dollars, I guess.
	I don't know how much she made J.K. Rowling's selling witchcraft to kids, you know.
	Now she's, these people are looking at what was the fruit of Christianity and they see that going away and they now have a problem with it because J.K. Rowling's is now talking about free speech.
	This is a Christian idea.
	You don't see this in other countries, do you?
	You don't see this in other religions, you don't see this in other political systems, and it's disappearing in the West as well.
	So, I guess, you know, her issue that she has is, and we've seen this for a long time, I said there's this, going back to about 2014-15 when the trainees first started to come on the scene, I said there's an inherent conflict here between the L's and the T's, and the LGBT's.
	There's going to be a civil war here.
	They're fighting each other over this, and that was evident from the very beginning of it.
	And so it's good for her that she's going to take a stand.
	I don't know that she's necessarily there in terms of standing for free speech in general.
	Or if she's just standing up for feminism and for women, which is, you know, somebody needs to stand up for women because the other people are not.
	She is a prominent critic of the trans people and other individuals.
	And so she put out a very long tweet talking about 11 individuals who are, many of them, rapists and other criminals who then pretended to be women so they could get into a women's prison.
	But she did this very long chain of talking about men pretending that they're women.
	On April the 1st, which was the day that this new Scottish censorship law went into effect.
	How appropriate. On April Fool's Day.
	And then at the very end of it, She says, April Fool's only kidding.
	Obviously, the people mentioned in the above tweets are not women at all, but they are men, every last one of them.
	Because she referred to them with female pronouns and everything as she was talking about them.
	Very sarcastic and certainly deserving to be mocked in terms of what is happening.
	She lives in Edinburgh. And so she says, well, I'm abroad right now, but I'm ready to be arrested for violating this Scottish law, censoring what we can say about trannies.
	As people point out, there's absolutely no protections in there for hate speech directed for women, but there is for the trannies.
	And I disagree with all hate speech rules.
	But freedom of speech and belief...
	Are at an end in Scotland if the accurate description of biological sex is deemed to be criminal, she said.
	I'm currently out of the country, but if what I've written here qualifies as an offense under the terms of the new act, I look forward to being arrested when I return to the birthplace of the Scottish Enlightenment.
	There was, once upon a time, Scottish people were very bold in terms of standing where they perceived as the truth.
	Look at John Knox confronting the Queen and others over their beliefs and make no doubt about it.
	This LGBT stuff is a religion.
	It is an anti-religion used to attack Christianity especially.
	In the same way that these small attacks by the So-called Church of Satan.
	They're doing that. Ms. Rowling's comments came after the Scottish National Party's Minister for Community Safety and those who misgender others online calling a trans woman he, for example, said could be investigated by police.
	Rowling, who warned of the effect on free speech, was reported to the North Umbria Police last month for calling trans TV broadcaster India Willoughby a man.
	Evidently he is.
	Police later said the complaint did not meet the criminal threshold.
	They are going to be very reluctant to prosecute her because of her high profile.
	And it's good that she has the boldness to speak out.
	Believe me, they will come after the individual Christian who speaks out.
	They're not going to come after her.
	I seriously doubt it.
	And if they do, even Rishi Sunak, the Prime Minister who calls himself a conservative, has said that she doesn't need to be arrested for this stuff.
	So we'll see what happens. It'll be interesting.
	Finally, somebody's going to push back against this stuff.
	In her social media posts, the author listed 10 high-profile trans people and denied their claims to be women.
	They included double rapist Isla Bryson, 31, who was initially jailed for eight years at a women's prison before later being moved to a male prison following a widespread backlash.
	Bryson, who was known as Adam Graham at the time of the offenses, transitioned in 2020 after being charged.
	For several years now, Scottish women have been pressured by their government and members of the police force to deny the evidence of their eyes and ears to repudiate biological facts to embrace a neo-religious concept of gender.
	It absolutely is a religion.
	Look, the climate stuff, the greenies, that's a religion as well.
	These people have a religious adherence to it.
	It is a foundation for a complete worldview.
	That's what a religion is.
	And it comes along with, you know, this is right, that's wrong.
	And I'm going to make sure that you do what is right and wrong.
	I'm going to impose this religion on you, that type of thing.
	You know, we've got a lot of different religions out there.
	And not all of them are formally recognized as religions.
	But it is a neo-religious concept of gender.
	That is unproven and untestable, she said.
	The redefinition of women to include every man who declares himself one has already had serious consequences for women's rights, girls' rights, and safety in Scotland, with the strongest impact felt as ever by the most vulnerable, including female prisoners and rape survivors.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	We will be right back.
	Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing.
	Check out the Jazz Channel at APSradio.com and the APS Radio App and leave the stress behind.
	Thank you for watching.
	Music by David T. Moffitt.
	Knight Show. Welcome back.
	Let's talk a little bit about squatters.
	We have, as I mentioned at the beginning of the program, the El Paso judge has now ordered the release of the squatters.
	They call them illegal aliens, or they call them newcomers, or whatever.
	I think squatter is the best term we could have.
	Who were filmed overrunning the National Guard on the southern border.
	That was an amazing visual that is happening there.
	But, of course, they're going to remove the razor wire and push their way in as squatters.
	And now we've got a judge who's going to reward that behavior.
	That happened two weeks ago.
	They're now going to be released on their own recognizance.
	What does that mean when you don't even know who these people are?
	Into America. And I guess on the way in, they get a nice basket of goodies, not just an Easter basket, free phones, cards loaded up with money, and all the rest of this stuff.
	Hey, we got some housing set up for you in various other places in the country, and if we don't have any public housing, you can just take somebody else's house over.
	We've now got, just as we've seen in the lawless areas overseen by Soros district attorneys that he helped elect, Just as they allow people to steal and go free.
	What they do, they organize themselves into criminal bands, and they started doing very organized theft, even causing the massive Wall Street big box retailers to shut down out of fear of losses.
	It got to such an extent.
	Where did that all happen?
	It happened because you had judges who would not uphold the law.
	Just like this cop that was shot in New York they had the funeral for.
	He had 21 prior arrests, and they just would arrest him and turn him out, arrest him and turn him out, over and over again.
	Finally, he wound up killing a cop.
	What are they going to do now?
	Are they going to release him again?
	Who knows? And so this is what happened.
	And now there are reports that the squatters, Are organizing criminal bans just like these people have in California and other places with the Soros District Attorneys.
	They've got organized looting of stores.
	Organized shoplifting on an industrial scale.
	Now there's word that these squatters are organizing themselves into bans of criminals who are invading neighborhoods, invading homes, and other things like that.
	If it hasn't happened, it will happen.
	Because that's what happens when you reward criminal behavior.
	And everything about the border is a reward system.
	You know, you have, and I had a lot of people who have written me, they were upset about comments about open border that a guest made on Friday.
	And I just have to say that, you know, when it comes to Borders and a lot of other things, I have big differences with the Libertarian Party.
	And I have some agreements with them as well.
	And so, you know, we have these discussions.
	We have people on. We talk to them about different issues.
	Frequently, when I have a guest on, I want to get their take on things.
	I don't necessarily want to have a debate with them.
	So I understand how that goes.
	But, you know, when you look at libertarians, they have some real blind spots when it comes to immigration.
	They have blind spots now, and that's always been there.
	That's always been there. They have, and I remember when I got in the Libertarian Party, right, they would have Operation Politically Homeless.
	They would go around to colleges and they would say, they would use a Nolan chart to get people to try to think in more than just a one-dimensional line where everything is left, right, or center.
	They said, well, let's think about this as a two-dimensional space.
	In this two-dimensional space, we can put leftist, right, we can have center, we can have authoritarian, we can have libertarian.
	And what he did was Nolan, David Nolan, one of the founders of the Libertarian Party, came up with, I think it was five or ten questions about individual liberty and five or ten questions about economic liberty and And you would answer these questions, and then they would plot it out on a scale, and you could see whether you were left, center, right, or whether you were totalitarian or libertarian.
	And, of course, they took the plot and they rotated it by 45 degrees, so it looks like a diamond rather than a rectangle like you typically see with a plot.
	And down at the bottom where you didn't believe in any freedom, well, that was the authoritarian area.
	And then if you believed in all the freedoms, that would put you up in the libertarian area.
	Well, when I took that, I never got 100% on it because I disagreed with the open border position of libertarians always.
	I said, you can't have an open border if you've got a welfare state.
	And that was before we created the welfare magnet for squatters.
	It is far, far worse with the Cloward and Piven strategy that's been put in.
	Far, far worse than it was when I was taking that thing, that test 40 years ago.
	But they have a real blind spot about that, which is really kind of strange, since the libertarians don't like a welfare state.
	And they can't connect the dots.
	And they don't really understand what is happening with us.
	It's kind of the same thing they do with censorship.
	Because they love corporations so much.
	And they operate under the fundamental illusion that we have a free market.
	We don't. We don't have a free market.
	We have crony capitalism.
	We have a kind of fascism, fascistic merger with the government and the corporations.
	And as I've said many times, libertarians think the corporations can do no wrong because they've got to compete for your product.
	Well, that's not really the way that it works anymore.
	And we can see that in their utter contempt for their customers.
	We've got Coca-Cola talking about how we've got to get rid of white people or whatever, NASCAR, you know, or just any of these.
	Any of these corporations that are bought into the ESG stuff, they openly have contempt for their customers.
	So obviously there's not a market situation that is happening here.
	Or Bud Light with Dylan Mulvaney or whatever Mulvaney, I guess it was.
	Anyway, they have open contempt for their customers.
	And they actively program against them, counter-program, 180 degrees away from them.
	So the marketplace is not in effect there.
	But they think the corporations are great because they have to obey the free market.
	Democrats don't think that government can do anything wrong, but they think corporations can do nothing right, and libertarians are just the opposite.
	They think corporations can do nothing wrong and government can do nothing right.
	And what both of them miss is the fact that corporations and government have merged in a fascist kind of way.
	And they've both become more evil than you could imagine, either of them being individually, because they're working together.
	And so we would see that all the time in terms of the way they would respond to corporate censorship.
	Absolutely clueless about the fact that the government was strong-arming them, coercing them, or rewarding them to do censorship on its behalf.
	That the censorship was really coming from the government.
	And you had Cato Institute, you had John Stossel, but you also had the Heritage Foundation, the biggest conservative think tank, would push back against all that stuff.
	Oh no, corporations should be able to shut you down.
	John Stossel. I really don't like being censored by them, but hey, corporations can do whatever they want.
	They've got rights and so forth.
	No, they don't. They've got government-granted privileges.
	And they're working for the government.
	And they can't acknowledge that.
	And so there's big blind spots.
	And the big blind spot that the libertarians have is that they think that what's happening at the border is like Ellis Island.
	It's nothing at all like Ellis Island.
	The Ellis Island experience when we saw people coming from potato famine in Ireland or massive wave of Italian immigration that happened in the early 20th century and some of it even in the aftermath of the Italian Civil War which happened at exactly the same time as the American Civil War and for the same reasons.
	Because it wasn't about slavery.
	It was about a fourth turning.
	It was about the Industrial Revolution and the consolidation of the nation state.
	But you had people coming to this country who had nothing but the clothes on their back.
	Why? Well, because they loved the ideals of America.
	Because they wanted to be American.
	Because they wanted to have the freedom to change their station in life.
	And there was no welfare.
	There was no safety net.
	There was nothing. They laid everything on the line.
	They burned the bridges.
	They had nothing. They brought nothing with them except a love of freedom and a love for America.
	That's very different from what's happening now.
	The people who are coming now are not coming for freedom.
	They're coming for free stuff.
	They are transported in many cases.
	This is the reality that the libertarians don't seem to understand.
	They're transported. By NGOs who have been given our taxpayer money to bring them here.
	They have wargamed this as to where they inject them into Central or South America to get around the immigration prohibitions in certain states.
	So they can then make that trip all the way up into the United States.
	And they give them cash cards and the rest of the stuff.
	And then the American government facilitates this.
	This is again like crony capitalism where you have the operation of these NGOs and these corporations and these globalists working with our national government to subvert and to undermine our government.
	That's what's really happening.
	We can forget the simplified abstractions about open borders and immigration that we should be able to go anywhere we want.
	Look, I don't like the idea of passports.
	I don't like the idea of borders either.
	But I don't like the idea of welfare.
	And you've got to, you know, that's the world that we live in.
	Until you get rid of welfare, which is what I always told libertarians for 40 years, unless you get rid of welfare, you cannot have open borders.
	And now we have it on steroids.
	So the presiding magistrate judge Umberto Acosta made his ruling on Sunday.
	During an online teleconference bond hearing where he accused the El Paso district attorney's office of not being ready to proceed with detention hearings for each defendant.
	And the district attorney asked for a continuation.
	This is typically just a formality.
	You know, if you are representing yourself and you ask for a continuance, they typically don't give it to you, right?
	But if an attorney asks for it, especially a district attorney, A judge is typically going to accommodate that.
	It's very unusual for them not to.
	And he's not doing it because he's got an agenda.
	He's looking at this as an excuse.
	It is a ruling of the court that all the rioting participation cases will be released on their own recognizance.
	A request for continuance was rejected by him.
	And as information points out, VDARE is being hounded to the ends of the earth by the government for running a legal and lawful anti-immigration website.
	While illegal aliens caught on film storming our border, overrunning the National Guard, are being ordered to be released into our country.
	This is, uh...
	That's what it looks like. And Chris Minahan at Information Liberation puts this definition from Wikipedia in.
	The purpose of a system is what it does.
	You know, they even have an acronym for it.
	You know, like Tonstoffel.
	There's no such thing as a free lunch type of thing.
	The purpose of a system is what it does.
	PosiWID, I guess.
	Can I pronounce it? This...
	It's a heuristic that says that there is, quote, no point in claiming that the purpose of a system is to do what it constantly fails to do.
	Right? We can say that about the school system, the education system.
	Is the purpose of the schools to actually educate kids?
	Well, no, because it consistently fails to do that.
	The purpose is to indoctrinate them, to groom them sexually, to do a bunch of other things, to get them to follow the crowd and Listen to people in authority.
	Be moved by peer pressure.
	That's the purpose of the educational system.
	It's not to educate people in reading, writing, and arithmetic.
	No, it's not about that.
	It's invoked to counter the notion that the purpose of a system can be read from the intentions of those who design, operate, and promote it.
	It is what it is.
	And again, this is something that libertarians ought to understand because a lot of them embrace Ayn Rand's objectivism, which says A equals A. It is what it is.
	And yet they refuse to look at the reality of what is happening at the border.
	I don't embrace objectivism.
	I don't embrace that system of atheism.
	But certainly we can say that the purpose of a system is what it does.
	And we should be able to realistically look at the border and understand what that is really about.
	And so how do we handle squatters?
	Whether they are at the border or whether they are at our home.
	Well, I gave you an example last week.
	Let me show you another example of how to handle a squatter.
	Stay off this property.
	You're not coming on this property.
	I'm going to get my van. Excuse me.
	Oh, your van is going to be towed.
	You can go around. This is private property.
	You're going to get out of my goddamn way. This is private property.
	This is private property.
	The cops were here last night.
	They know we're here. This is private property.
	I'm going to get my van. You're not going to sit here.
	You can go around. Record this.
	You can go around. You're not.
	You're not. You broke this fence.
	Did you cut this fence? No, it's already broke when we got here.
	No, it wasn't. It broke when we got here.
	I'm not blocking you.
	I'm stopping you from trespassing on this property.
	Yeah, you trespassed. Your van is going to be towed.
	No, it's not going to be towed.
	You got to get out of the way. Jake, record this now.
	I am recording it.
	You better let me through or I'm going to hit you.
	You're not going to block my thing.
	You're not going to lock me in here. You cut a hole in this fence.
	I didn't cut this. Don't throw that shit out of here.
	Don't get my husband. Don't get my husband and my son right now.
	Yeah, get everybody. Let's come back with everybody.
	Force our way in. He's recording as well.
	Now he pulls out his gun.
	She's got a stick and he's got a gun.
	This is what needs to be done at the border here.
	Yeah, that's the way you handle squatters, whether they're at the border or they're at your house.
	You know, possession, he's got possession of the property.
	They left. They can't come back.
	They can't force their way back in.
	They have no right to attack him.
	But the bottom line is, all legal arguments aside, the gun has a last...
	There's other ways to do it, though.
	And as I pointed out last week, the one guy who did it legally, he looked at it, and he just sat there and he waited until they left one day.
	And then he took possession of the property just like this guy.
	And it was his mother's property.
	He realized that his mother didn't have any rights as the owner.
	But if he got a lease, signed lease, from her saying that he was renting the property, well, now it was renter versus renter.
	See, our government puts renters over the people who own the property.
	And that's going to change when we're all renters, believe me, which is their goal.
	So he made himself a renter, and he took possession, and he said, I have a valid lease here, so go call the police if you think you can do something about it.
	But eventually, push is going to come to shove with that type of thing in most cases.
	But in this particular case, they just decided they would go somewhere else.
	Well, the Biden administration, maybe he doesn't know about this either.
	He didn't know about his trans day of visibility, he says.
	Maybe he doesn't know that they just gave $320 million to Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, and Tunisia to build border walls.
	Imagine that. He literally gives them money to build their border walls.
	$320 million.
	But, of course, we paid over $80 billion, or, well, $60 billion, they say, for Ukrainian border security.
	It's way more than that. It's actually more than $100 billion that we have paid for that.
	Canada, meanwhile, is also getting the great replacement treatment.
	Canada has had the most rapid population growth in 66 years.
	And it's all foreigners coming in.
	All foreigners. Not a birth rate.
	The birth rates are collapsing.
	The highest annual growth rate reported since 1957.
	Canada's real-time population clock shows the country's population has now broken 41 million just months after breaking the 40 million threshold.
	And so they said in 2023, the vast majority, 97.6% of Canada's population growth came from international migration.
	Both permanent and temporary.
	And the remaining portion, 2.5%, came from a natural increase, said Statistics Canada.
	In Michigan, again, we talk about the fact these people are squatters, right?
	The headline from mainstream media is that Michigan is offering $500 in rent aid a month To house illegal newcomers.
	Newcomers. No, they're not newcomers.
	They're squatters. And good luck getting them out.
	Amy Hovey, Executive Director of Michigan State Housing Development Authority, said the program aligns with a goal to increase affordable housing across the state for everyone, including those who are seeking to build a new life here.
	Oh, well, you see, they've got an American dream.
	Which is better than yours.
	Of course, I don't imagine they're going to help people who are really refugees, like the German Christian homeschooling family, who had been here for a decade and then Biden tried to throw them out.
	They wanted to take away their children in Germany because they wanted to homeschool.
	So they came to America.
	And then you had the Biden administration after they'd been here for a decade.
	And they were supporting themselves as well, by the way.
	Have to throw them out. Have to send them back.
	We'll be right back. If you like the Eagles, the cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com.
	♪♪
	so
	liberty it's your move And now, The David Knight Show.
	Well, I want to thank some of the people who have left tips on RockFan.
	Wayne Wonder, thank you very much.
	Michelle Obaman, thank you.
	And James, all on RockFan, thank you very much.
	I appreciate that. And I want to respond a little bit here to some emails that I got.
	This is from Harry Hound, and it is a quote going back to June the 4th, 2020.
	When Trump was president.
	And this is, Trump is being quoted in this tweet by USAID. This is the CIA agency that Obama's mama worked for.
	Of course, his grandparents were some of the founders of the CIA, OSS and things like that.
	But USAID is a CIA front group that would go into various countries.
	And they quoted, they put this out as a tweet from USAID, and they quoted Trump who said, As the coronavirus has shown, there are no borders.
	Hmm. USAID echoes real Donald Trump's words and is proud to be partnering with Gavi by committing $1.16 billion to protect people through vaccines because vaccines work.
	So USAID and Trump partnering with Bill Gates, a global vaccine organization, Gavi, back in June of 2020.
	Did we forget that somehow?
	Well, there's your reminder, your daily reminder.
	Democrat strategist Begala thinks that third-party candidates are cockroaches.
	This was sent to me by Mark.
	Thank you, Mark. Yeah. He says, this Gateway Pundit article shouldn't surprise you.
	Democrat strategist Paul Begala thinks that third-party candidates are cockroaches.
	He said the quiet part out loud.
	I actually called them cockroaches.
	Well, we know that.
	We know that the inner party does not like any competition.
	And, you know, it's not just that they...
	They hate Trump. It is a Game of Thrones.
	These people all hate each other.
	We just have to make sure that we don't become their pawns in their 4D chess game.
	This is from Baby Bear, who says, so what is a treaty?
	I mentioned this briefly yesterday, but this listener sent this to me.
	He says, I just checked a few of my dictionaries.
	I've got a Webster 1828 Dictionary, a Random House College Dictionary from 1984, and Barron's Law Dictionary, 1996.
	He says, I'll include the definition from Webster's as to what a treaty is.
	They all basically agreed on it.
	But you know, the language is malleable, isn't it?
	And so he said they all say essentially the same thing, but Webster's, to quote specifically, a treaty is an agreement, a league, or a contract between two or more nations or sovereigns.
	Formally signed by commissioners, properly authorized, solemnly ratified by the several sovereigns or by the supreme power of each state.
	Treaties are of various kinds as treaties for regulating commercial intercourse, treaties of alliance, offensive and defensive, treaties for hiring troops, treaties of peace, etc.
	And then he says this, so what is it about this WHO treaty here?
	The WHO and the World Economic Forum are not nations.
	They're not sovereigns. So, you know, how do we get these things?
	And when you look at the UN, it's not a nation either.
	But when they come up with these things like the Paris Climate Accord, these are things that we understand are really put together by these NGOs or these non-governmental agencies.
	They put them together under the pretense that it's all the nations acting together.
	But what it is, it's something that is drawn up by the World Economic Forum or by the UN or by the World Health Organization.
	And they're the ones who are masterminding the Paris Climate Accord or the Pandemic Treaty and the rest of the stuff.
	He says Wikipedia, though, it's interesting.
	Wikipedia has changed the definition from what Webster's had, you know, in the 1800s or the dictionaries from the 1980s or the legal dictionary from the 1990s.
	Here's the new malleable definition.
	From Wikipedia, a treaty is a formal, legally binding, written contract between actors in international law.
	It doesn't say sovereign nations, does it?
	It is usually made by and between sovereign states, but it can include international organizations, individuals, business entities, and other legal persons.
	This is how they change the language.
	And this is important because it shows us that they're going to drop the pretense of this being an organization that's just bringing together the nations so that they can act together collectively.
	They're going to drop that pretense and they're going to go direct with it. I think that's the key thing here.
	They really are prepping for global governance by stakeholders.
	That's one of the reasons why the Wikipedia thing has changed it.
	Well, it can be with individuals.
	It could be with, here it is, organizations, individuals, business entities, corporations.
	The people that are constantly described as stakeholders by the UN, by the World Economic Forum, and so forth.
	You see, we don't have a stake.
	We're not going to own anything.
	We'll rent everything from the stakeholders.
	They will own everything.
	And they will be the ones who are making these treaties that they say are going to be binding against us.
	And they will be binding.
	And the only way we're going to eventually break these chains is by violence, I'm afraid, because they're not going to follow any rule of law.
	They're prepping for global governance folks that is already here.
	We already have global governance by stakeholders.
	The idea that the stakeholders are corporations as well as countries, that the two of them are essentially equal.
	And we see them moving in that direction with some of these trade treaties in NAFTA, for example, where even though that was supposed to be between different sovereign nations, they would have arbitration there, and it was corporations that were bringing actions against the countries that were signatories in this NAFTA accord.
	Already moving towards an equality.
	Already moving towards global governance by corporations and states.
	Darren from Alberta.
	Thank you. He said, I'm sending you...
	0.000313Bitcoin. I don't know how that works out right now.
	Hope it finds you well.
	Thank you. I appreciate that. We do have a Bitcoin thing where people can make contributions, and people do do that.
	They do that on Cash App also has a way that you can send Bitcoin as well.
	A couple of people have done that.
	And I still got it there, so it's gone up.
	We're going to just... I'm going to ride this thing up to wherever it goes, I guess.
	He says, also, whenever you mention it, I hit the like button, too.
	So, please, folks, hit the like button.
	Thank you for the reminder, Darren, and thank you for the contribution.
	And the like button really does make a difference.
	It helps to give us visibility.
	One of the biggest struggles that we've got is visibility right now.
	This is from Charlie, who is in Thailand, and he sent me a comment that he's been putting on some of these Trump cheerleading sites and discussions.
	Why aren't you helping Donald Trump sell his Bible?
	If he happens to be selected to be the next occupant of the White House, you can be sure that CBDC's 5G, etc. will be a part of his time in office.
	After all, he destroyed the economy, facilitated a bioweapon, which to date has killed about 17 million people globally.
	Your people continue to amaze me." He says, by the way, Benedict Donald cares as little about you as he does about the January six people in the DC Gulag.
	And he says, this is getting me blocked from the comment sections of a lot of different places.
	He says, Greg Hunter has blocked him as well.
	So, yeah, that will work that way.
	Finally, this is from Will, who had an experience with the census.
	He said, I recently had the privilege of receiving a census form in the mail.
	I chose to ignore it. However, about two weeks later, I received another request.
	Again, I ignored it and tossed it in the trash.
	Two weeks after that, I received another, which I also ignored and discarded.
	Finally, I received a note from the census folks stating that if I did not respond by a certain date, within a week as I recall, I would be subjected to a fine of $5,000 or worse.
	Finally, I did respond, and I was angered and annoyed at how intrusive the questions were.
	Here's some of the examples, he said.
	How many rooms are in your house?
	How much property tax do you pay?
	How much is your mortgage payment?
	What is your income?
	What gender are you?
	And he said, and they gave you five choices.
	Is that all? Can't you imagine?
	You can only imagine five different genders.
	What's the matter with these people? They need some additional time in a DEI reprogramming instructions here.
	What ethnicity are you?
	Do you rent out any of your home?
	Are you on Social Security?
	If so, how much do you receive?
	And numerous other questions. He said, it would seem to me that the government already has all this information.
	Via the IRS, via license bureaus, many other public records.
	So what is the game here?
	Yeah, well, you know, it may be a perjury trap.
	It just may be the pretense that we're not sharing information when we actually know that they really are.
	Interestingly enough, you talk about all the information the government has.
	When I interviewed William Benny years ago, and they were trying to push the false Russiagate stuff with Trump.
	And William Binney says, they've got all of this stuff.
	They've got all the records out there in Bluffdale, Utah, and other places like that.
	They're capturing everything that everybody's done.
	And so they pretend that they don't know?
	Yeah, I think a lot of this stuff is really just kind of trying to get people in a perjury trap like the FBI does when it brings you in for questioning.
	That's just trying to entrap you.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back and talk about climate.
	We had some interesting things that have now turned up on RFK Jr.
	and his ideas about a smart grid.
	Whether you're feeling like the blues.
	Really? APS Radio has you covered.
	Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APS radio.com
	Music Playing...
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	video.
	you Well, let's talk about RFK Jr.
	and his ideas for a smart grid that have not really aged very well in the last 13 years.
	But before we do, a couple of comments here.
	On Rock Band, Ghost Bo says, I bet this infestation of squatters will make everybody think twice about posting their plans to take a cruise on Facebook this season.
	Yeah, that would probably be smart not to brag about the fact you're going to be gone for a couple of weeks.
	Always has been a good idea, not that.
	Not to publicize that.
	On Rumble, Johnny Freedom says, My brother got COVID last week for the third time.
	Twice since he got the jabs.
	I'm still at zero and with zero jabs.
	Yeah, as I said before, I really do think that the...
	We have seasons, and I remember when the swine flu thing was, they put out that rushed vaccine and things like that.
	But I did get sick with the worst case of flu I'd had that year.
	Now, nobody else in the family got sick.
	I've had one of my best friends, longest friends, He had a positive COVID test and got very, very sick.
	He was able to get ivermectin, and that's what really got him over his pneumonia.
	But again, nobody in his family got sick.
	And so I'm reluctant to say that there has been a gain-of-function change in something that was released, okay?
	I think we have years where there are very bad viruses that go around, and some people are susceptible to them, and some people aren't.
	And I don't think anything really changed with that.
	I think what changed was the way that people used it in the government.
	And I think what really changed was the fact that you had this Trump shot bioweapon that was put out there.
	That's still the key thing, I believe.
	Let's take a look at RFK Jr.
	He supported building a national smart grid system.
	To remotely shut off personal appliances back in 2011, 13 years ago.
	This is a video that is now resurfaced and posted out there by the New York Post.
	He argued that a $250 billion grid would eliminate peak demand periods and insisted that consumers would not care about their devices being rendered inoperable for 15 minutes at a time.
	Here he is talking about it.
	It will probably cost about $250 billion to build a smart grid that reaches most of America and that can do the things that we need to do, like can send signals through the line, allow the utilities to send a signal through the line to turn off the hot water boilers in a million homes for 15 minutes in order to avoid The peak demand that is the most expensive part of our electrical system.
	If you eliminate a peak, you save enough natural gas in our country to power the entire U.S. passenger car fleet.
	Yeah, the entire U.S. passenger car fleet, especially if we don't have cars, right?
	This guy was, and I believe still is, A radical environmentalist.
	A radically stupid environmentalist who doesn't value free speech.
	He doesn't value freedom.
	He doesn't value markets or anything else.
	He's going to impose things on us that he knows better.
	He's an old-style Democrat in that regard.
	I've got some ideas of how I'm going to fix society.
	I'm going to impose them on you.
	And those kind of people are really dangerous, as the quote from C.S. Lewis.
	I can't remember exactly, but, you know, there's no kind of tyranny better than people think that they're doing it for your own good.
	So he's radically stupid as an environmentalist.
	He is not for free speech.
	I played the clips that are more recent than that, I believe, where he said we need to lock up the Koch brothers and Because he didn't like their position on environmentalism.
	He wasn't just talking about silencing them, but he didn't put them in jail.
	He was also not anti-vaccine.
	And he's also not anti-CIA. He's got family who, you know, was it his daughter or whatever, working for the CIA, now part of his campaign?
	One of the things Salenti said, Gerald Salenti.
	So he's positioned himself to be anti-war until he changed his mind on all of that.
	And then he put in the CIA person and he got rid of Dennis Kucinich and all the rest of the stuff.
	You need to understand who this guy is.
	Typical politician.
	They present one image, they're exactly the opposite.
	Just like Trump is exactly the opposite of being an anti-globalist.
	You know, he is against his competitors and they're against him, but he did everything the globalist wanted.
	So he said, if you've got enough natural gas, we've got enough natural gas in our country, he said at the time, to power the entire U.S. passenger fleet if we eliminate the peaks.
	And we can do that by telling people when they can even use their electrical appliances.
	You see, when you look at this mania that they have, that everything's got to be electrical.
	And then we will tell you when, and we'll manage that electrical grid.
	It'll become a control grid.
	And that's always been the purpose.
	Always been the purpose of this stuff.
	And there's also this ignorance of these people.
	I say stupid.
	It is stupid. You go around and you ask these people, what is your favorite source of power?
	Well, I like electricity.
	Electricity is clean. That's not a source of power.
	That is a product of power.
	How are you going to generate that electricity?
	Are you going to use fuel?
	Are you going to use hydroelectric?
	Are you going to use solar or wind?
	And how do those things stack up with each other?
	Electricity is the output, folks, and they can't get that through their heads.
	They think, oh, this is great.
	I got electric things and they don't smoke.
	I want more of those things.
	That's my favorite source of power.
	They got a consumer mindset.
	They don't even understand how this stuff is produced.
	But he says, it can go into your car, and we can borrow that stored electricity in your car that's in your battery.
	And as I've said before, this is the future that these people foresee for electric vehicles.
	They don't want you to have private transportation whatsoever, including electric cars.
	No, those expensive electric vehicles that you buy, those are going to be extra batteries for them.
	Connected to the power grid.
	They'll tell you, you can't drive your car, we don't have enough power, but we're going to need that power that you put into your car, so we're going to use it.
	We're going to cycle through the battery.
	Every time you cycle through these batteries, that uses up its useful life.
	And so we're going to be using up your batteries, cycling them on and off, and filling them up, draining them out, filling them up, draining them out, in order to power the grid.
	So they're going to use them as grid batteries, but you're not going to use them as cars.
	We need, he said, to create a marketplace that does what a market is supposed to do, which is to reward efficiency, to reward good behavior, to punish bad behavior.
	Well, again, that's not what he's talking about.
	He's saying that he's not talking about having a marketplace.
	He's talking about government edicts.
	And they're going to decide what is good in terms of energy usage.
	They're going to decide what is good in terms of speech.
	And they will decide what is bad with both of those things.
	And they will prohibit the bad stuff.
	No, in a free market, it's the people who decide good and bad, not the government.
	And the people do a much better job than even the smartest people if you put them in the government.
	I've pointed this out many times.
	If you have a...
	The collective intelligence of people operating in a really free marketplace who can make decisions about what to purchase and what to use, their collective intelligence is really kind of like a large neural network, which is always going to be smarter than a CPU, a central processor unit.
	That decentralization is the key.
	The fact that you've got all these people evaluating all this information.
	You see, even the smartest person or the fastest CPU is limited by the amount of data that it's got coming in.
	And that's why this essentially, if you want to think about it as a neural network, why it is so much more superior.
	They have more information so they can make better decisions than even the smartest and most honest central planner.
	But, you know, he looks at free markets and at free speech and he thinks he knows better.
	Typical. Typical. We need to have a smart, gritty set so that when you plug in more than six Prius cars, you don't black out the neighborhood.
	Is this like a vision of hell here?
	We got a power grid so weak that six Prius cars are going to take it down.
	And we're all driving Priuses as well.
	Not that there's anything wrong with it.
	If that's your decision, I just don't want to have a gun put to my head saying I've got to drive a particular type of car.
	I must drive this. I can't drive that.
	That's what's wrong. That's what's not a free market.
	Despite Kennedy's utopian language, energy experts who spoke to the New York Post warned a national grid could be susceptible to both cyber attacks and bad actors and vulnerable to U.S. government overreach into people's privacy.
	You think? Of course.
	Of course. The last thing that people that run these grids want to do is to have one big grid, said the CEO of the American Energy Institute.
	Well, that depends.
	That's what the politicians want.
	They want everything centralized and under their control.
	And they don't care if it works or not.
	The important thing is that they control it.
	You know, they don't care if they're some tin-pot dictator with a starving economy and everything is in rags.
	If they're the top dog, that's all that matters to them.
	They're perfectly fine with austerity as long as they're in control.
	Control is what they're looking for, and they'll burn our society down in order to get it.
	Biden has spent billions, and as a matter of fact, seven and a half billion, To set up a charging network for EVs.
	But only seven stations have been built in four different states.
	So, so far that's about a billion dollars, a little over a billion dollars, per charger installed.
	This is the efficiency of the government.
	And again, they don't care that it is unworkable.
	For them, that's fine. The purpose of Biden and all the rest of these people is not to transition to clean energy.
	Their purpose is to cripple and destroy our society.
	Everything about it.
	Now, as we look at renewable mandates...
	And again, back in 2009, I was with an organization.
	Colorado was the first state that was putting in renewable energy mandates.
	We're going to mandate that X percentage of power generated in Colorado comes from wind and solar.
	And so we were saying, well, that's not a good idea.
	It's also should not, you know, we challenge it on a legal basis.
	This is an article from whatsupwiththat.com.
	Hawaii's energy transition, where they replaced coal, clean coal, With solar has now, in a period of just a couple of years, caused their already highest energy rates to go up by a third.
	A third. Went from 30 cents a kilowatt hour up to 41 cents a kilowatt hour.
	And what's interesting about this is that we see this approach being taken in a lot of different states.
	Here in Tennessee, the Tennessee Valley Authority wants to put in wind and solar, and they want to put in these big battery energy storage sites, BESS, massive lithium batteries, a massive fire waiting to happen.
	They want to position them in various places so they can store energy from solar and wind because they can't produce it on a steady-state basis like a fuel-based system.
	And it's not the only one. This guy who had over 50 years, I think it's 57 years, working as a power engineer, said, yeah, I'm glad that they did this in Hawaii because Hawaii is a perfect test case.
	It's an island. It's isolated from all these other grids.
	And so they have to produce all their energy right there.
	And it's like a little closed system.
	And he said, what they have done in Hawaii...
	It's what they want to do here where I live in South Carolina, he said.
	And it's what they want to do here in Tennessee as well.
	So my state of South Carolina and neighboring states are planning similar renewable plus energy storage.
	So thank you, Hawaii Electric, for providing this outstanding example of applied renewables.
	Your experiences are very helpful.
	He says, in 2020, I wrote how this would be a glimpse into the future, the Green New Deal.
	He said, well, here we are. The last coal plant in Hawaii was shut down.
	They installed much generation capacity and renewables and added the largest or at least one of the largest battery storage systems in the world.
	How has it worked out?
	Well, he said, here's my update from the June 2020 blog.
	At that time, he said, amongst U.S. states, Hawaii has some of the most ambitious mandates for shifting from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources to generate electricity.
	Drop the fossil.
	Drop that. That's a weaponized term.
	It's fuel. It's fuel.
	To achieve these mandates, the state aims to rely heavily on battery energy storage systems to provide backup.
	On Hawaiian Island of Oahu, a large and sophisticated battery energy storage system recently came online, marking a key point in the state's efforts to move towards a future of 100% renewable energy.
	It was a massive Tesla megapack of lithium batteries.
	The system can meet 17% of Oahu's electricity demand for three hours.
	Isn't that great? This massive grift from Elon Musk.
	And it can only produce less than a fifth of the electricity.
	Well, one sixth. Let's just call it that.
	One sixth of the electricity for three hours.
	As a percentage of the electricity system that it serves, this project is larger than any other battery storage project in the world.
	And so he said, and here we are, four years later, they've gone from the highest retail electricity price in the U.S. at 30 cents per kilowatt hour to 41 cents per kilowatt hour.
	So he said, digging a little bit deeper, the plans for the future are for 52% renewable by 2021, 100% renewable by 2045.
	So imagine how expensive that's going to be when they go 100%.
	He finishes up and he says, many of my knowledgeable friends have suggested that if the U.S. were to apply 100% renewables, it would be a very good idea to first apply this to one electric supply system rather than force green energy on all of the states at the same time.
	We have 50 different states.
	We should have different approaches.
	And that goes for a lot of different things, but especially for this.
	Well, he says, we have a completed experiment.
	Hawaii has passed the test.
	Being the first experiment of applying the Green New Deal.
	And we can see just how it has failed miserably.
	And yet we have South Carolina, Tennessee and others wanting to reconstruct that.
	And Virginia. Residents in Virginia Beach are already complaining about an offshore wind project causing cracks in their walls from the vibration of these 900-foot towers being installed.
	So, can you imagine if they're that close enough that the vibrations of the installation are causing cracks in their wall?
	Can you imagine what is going to happen when they actually start these things up?
	It's very well documented.
	They even have a name for it.
	They call it wind turbine syndrome.
	The health effects that it produces.
	And animals and whales and human beings and all the rest of this stuff.
	And it's also a big eyesore.
	You know, people paid a lot of money to get beachfront property there in Virginia Beach.
	Now they're going to look out and see these gigantic turbines, but it's going to be not just the visual impact of it, but it's going to be the actual physical impact of that that is going to be a big issue for them.
	And then there's other issues besides the wind turbine syndrome.
	You also have the blackout syndrome and the empty wallet syndrome.
	16 billion pounds of Scottish wind energy is being blown away.
	The inefficient transmission of wind power from Scotland to England is projected to waste over 16 billion pounds this decade due to regulatory and planning failures resulting in higher electricity bills for consumers.
	Now, this is not just the fact that the stuff is so much more expensive.
	Oh, well, you know, wind and sun, that's going to be free, right?
	No, no.
	But it's even worse than that.
	Because what they're doing is they're putting this up in the sea, close to Scotland, and then they wind up not having a way to transmit the power back into other places.
	They've got a bottleneck in terms of transmission lines.
	You know, they put up the massive wind farms in Texas, They had the state of Texas spend, I don't know how much, how many billions of dollars to run infrastructure to pull that power back in.
	Well, they haven't done that in the UK. Instead, what they do is when they have too much power, they pay the wind farm companies to make the windmills go idle.
	They pay them to shut them off.
	Now, that is called curtailment.
	And that curtailment is going to cost more than $700 million in 2023.
	With a further 140 million pounds spent in January and February this year alone.
	And yet, even though they've got excess capacity, more than they can send to other places, and they're paying them to shut the windmills down, They are still building them.
	And why wouldn't you?
	If you're a corporation and you've got a government that's that stupid because of its central planning, that they're going to pay you to build these windmills, and then they're going to pay you when they've got too many of them, they're going to pay you to make them idle, why wouldn't you build more?
	That's a pretty good model.
	That kind of stuff is how Elon Musk got to be the world's richest man.
	You know, playing on all of this green stuff and this ESG stuff.
	And now, with his purchase of Twitter, he has all of a sudden become the conservative working man hero.
	Almost up there with Donald Trump.
	Higher than Donald Trump in the esteem of some people.
	Costs are expected to shoot up as offshore wind farms continue to grow, while cable construction remains mired.
	Mired in what?
	And government approval process, just like what we're talking about with the bridge.
	And what takes so long to build these bridges?
	Well, they've got to do all these environmental studies and everything.
	These people are rewarding and subsidizing these companies to put windmills out in the sea.
	They don't have enough infrastructure to bring it back.
	And it isn't for any other reason other than the fact that they've got themselves tied up with their own red tape, their own government, tying them up with red tape.
	It doesn't get any dumber than any of this stuff.
	One last thing, and then we've got our guest coming on.
	Our guest today is Goatree.
	We're going to talk about technology today.
	In the UK, again, you have motorists have been given 12 million pounds worth of fines for driving through a neighborhood that has designated itself as clean air.
	You can drive through neighboring areas.
	This is very much like the Paris Climate Accord, right?
	We've got global problems, they say.
	Global warming. And so we've got to have everybody shut down their coal plants, except for China and India.
	They can build as many as they want.
	They don't have to have any pollution control on them whatsoever.
	And the environmentalists say, wait, this doesn't make any sense.
	If this is a global issue, how can you allow the two biggest countries to have as much and as dirty a power generation as they want?
	Well, here you have neighborhoods right next to each other.
	You can drive through this one, but if you drive through that one, we're going to give you a fine, unless you've got a zero-emission electric vehicle.
	And so the people there are protesting.
	Stop the LTNs.
	Put democracy and safety first.
	This is a cynical greenwashing scheme.
	Oh, it absolutely is.
	While residents within the borough are allowed to move freely amongst the streets.
	You know, they're given a pass just like the Chinese and Indians are.
	Alongside black cab drivers care that black cab that's not talking about the skin color of the cab driver.
	This is the black cab is like we got yellow cabs, yellow taxis here.
	Caterers and businesses, visitors out of borough drivers will be fined.
	Further, the council spent £20,000 on road markings and signage with a further £10,000 used for promotion letters and leaflets to threaten people when it was first introduced.
	They call it a traffic calming scheme.
	That is typically when you put speed bumps in.
	But in this particular case, they're actually putting up barriers to keep people from being able to drive.
	Ha ha. That's the extreme case of traffic calming.
	Along a certain route, in the hope that it will make the roads more pedestrian-friendly and reduce air pollution.
	And yet, in another neighboring town here, they have $1.2 million cycle lanes, bicycle lanes.
	So at 1.2, I keep saying dollars, but it's pounds.
	And it has destroyed the businesses there.
	First of all, they took forever to build, just as we're going to see with the bridge collapsing.
	Took forever to build, and now it's such a bottleneck because, see, first they do the road calming, putting obstacles in the road so the cars can't even drive through, or putting speed bumps in, or they do the road diet, which means that they cut off areas of it to put bicycle lanes in.
	And the people there are saying the same thing I said when I went to Tampa and saw all the bicycle lanes everywhere.
	There's nobody using them. I don't think it's a good idea because you don't see cyclists using it at all.
	I saw two people cycling up the road earlier, but one person was using the pavement, and the other one was using the main road, in other words, the pavement, the sidewalk.
	That's what we saw when we went to Tampa.
	It's absolutely insane.
	And we've got to get control of local government.
	It's local government. Then this one area put in the massive fines and shut down the road.
	It's another one that is doing the road calming and the road diets and all the rest of this stuff.
	That is where the rubber meets the road, and that is where these people are going to shut down the driving and shut down the road.
	And we need to try to identify some people who value freedom.
	And short circuit it.
	If we understand what the global agenda is, we can then fight it and stop it locally.
	We'll be right back.
	Whether you're feeling like the blues or bluegrass, APS Radio has you covered.
	Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APSradio.com.
	Goodbye.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com Alright, welcome back.
	Joining us now is a guest we've had on many times, always enjoy talking to, Goat Tree.
	He works in the cybersecurity area, and he is, I think you call him a white hat guy that is protecting against the black hat guys.
	In other words, a business will hire him to try to find vulnerabilities and warn them before the bad guys do it.
	So joining us now is Goatree.
	Good to have you on, Goatree. Thanks for joining us.
	Hey, good morning, David. What's on your mind today?
	Oh, man, everything.
	You know, you've got a great show rolling today.
	And, you know, I was listening and I was thinking, you know, failure's good.
	It's really good.
	Because a lot of this that you were talking about has failed.
	And I hope it continues to fail, even though they're promoting it like it's on the horizon.
	Yeah. Oh yeah, absolutely.
	Yeah, I'm happy to see these self-driving cars fail.
	But you know what? They don't care.
	There's several articles out from mainstream media in the last couple of days saying, well, whether it works or not, we're going to equip the semi-trailers to be self-driving.
	It's like, you've already seen it doesn't work.
	You've already seen how bad it is in San Francisco and other places like that, and you've had to stop these experiments.
	So now what you're going to do is you're going to fail up.
	I mean, this is ridiculous.
	They keep taking it up to bigger and bigger things to fail.
	Well, I mean, but they'll promote it as a success.
	I mean, you know, one of the things I've really got to chuckle about, and everybody's panicked about it.
	Well, you should be panicked about it, but, you know, Elon Musk just did that brain chip thing, and he's promoting it as a success.
	And one thing, it validates what we've been saying for years about it to plug people into the grid.
	He put this chip into a man that was paralyzed from the neck down.
	Under the premise that it's going to give him his motor skills back and do all this.
	Another thing...
	The Scott came out of it so far is the guy's hooked up to the net, just like we've been predicting all along, and the only result Elon's gotten from it was posted on X, I'm Elon's bot.
	Yeah. He still can't move his arms.
	He still can't move his legs, but he's fired up to the net now.
	Yeah, he can play video games with his mind.
	Isn't that a great accomplishment?
	That's a pretty radical game accessory to open up your skull and put a chip on your brain so that you can play a game.
	I mean, that's amazing.
	Well, now, I think the most successful part about it is, you know, how we've been talking about how are they going to hook you up to the net?
	And then that's going to lead into your facts.
	But how is he able to transmit outside of his skull?
	I mean, that was one of the sticking points.
	And the only thing I can think of is the guy's got, like, this antenna like these cartoon Martians, you know, where he raises the antenna and connects to the Internet.
	I don't know how they've done it.
	That old TV show, My Favorite Martian, where he thinks about it, gets a couple of antennas come out of his head.
	I don't know. But, you know, at the same time, as they move forward in this, and of course, here's the vision coming from the Rand Corporation.
	They said that there's going to be an Internet of Brains.
	By 2050. This sounds like the Matrix.
	I mean, these people are trying to make science fiction come true.
	And it's kind of interesting, you know, to see writers like Annie Jacobson.
	She's now out again talking about nuclear war.
	But I've talked about her books on Operation Paperclip and on DARPA and other things like that.
	She gets access to these people in the Pentagon and talks about, you know, what is coming up.
	But... It truly is amazing.
	She said they'd like to get these science fiction writers and movie producers into the Pentagon and talk to them, because then that gives them a vision for what they want to implement.
	And she said when she went there with Gayle Ann Hurd, who was the former wife of James Cameron, they were married and co-producers of the Terminator series.
	And then they got divorced.
	And he just, as far as I'm concerned, he made a bunch of underwater movies and everything. But you know, with Gayle Ann Hurd there, everybody was like, Oh, I love the Terminator. I mean, they identify with the villains. And she said, that's kind of the scary part of this. She said, first of all, they're all kind of, you know, when they go home, they're, they got a family and they got a dog and they got a TV and they're kind of like us.
	But she said, the bad thing about it is these people identify with the villains and they're looking at these science fiction writers.
	Give me some ideas of some things that I can do.
	Well, here we've got the Rand Corporation talking about an Internet of Brains.
	Looks like they've been camping out on the Matrix.
	Mm-hmm. And here's another Felt.
	Okay. Now you think about this.
	Google AI. They're presenting the Founding Fathers as African Americans.
	This is not AI. And to me, it's just flat out fraudulent.
	It's a failure.
	It's programmed.
	It has nothing to do with AI. They're trying to influence people under the guise of AI. Now, that's the public access to their AI. I don't know what's in the back room.
	But to me, I mean, if I had a staff of programmers that did that to my AI, everybody would...
	But you know, it's perfect because it was a picture of what they were doing with text, you know, and yet when you do it with a picture, everybody gets it instantly.
	And now they're talking about the fact that they can do voice cloning so quickly that they only need 15 seconds of your voice in order to clone it.
	Okay, well, I guess maybe if Google's doing this, everybody's going to sound like Samuel L. Jackson, right?
	Hey, maybe they all sound like me.
	They'll get lucky. You know, I don't know.
	I don't know. Yeah, they're going to be misappropriating voices all over the place.
	This is such dangerous technology that only the government can have it, right?
	This is Sam Altman, right, who is always, this guy is dangerous, but he's going to give that technology to the government to clone our voices, but you and I can't have that.
	It's just too dangerous for us to have that kind of technology.
	Right. Hey, you know, once again, I think maybe it's time someone to start calling failures a good thing, because have you seen this technology?
	I haven't. I mean, I hear about it.
	Yeah. I mean, but I haven't seen anything.
	And it's great cover for these politicians.
	You know, that wasn't me.
	That was AI. Mm-hmm.
	That's right. Trump was saying that when they were doing all of this stuff, you know, all these clips of me saying that's all AI. He's already using that as an excuse, as an alibi.
	It's like, no, I think that was you.
	So, you know, it's like everybody's talking about failure.
	I used to be totally anti-failure, but now I'm embracing it.
	It's like failure's a good thing with what these people are doing.
	Well, you sound like me.
	We start out in technology, and it's like, this stuff is great, and then we start seeing how it's being monopolized by the government and by the military-industrial complex and DARPA and all the rest of the stuff, and we start rooting for failure.
	You know, I've got a great story for you, and it goes back to your days at TI. You remember back in the 80s, even in the 70s, man, if you had a calculator, a handheld calculator, you were top of the food chain.
	That's right. That's right.
	And one of the first things I did, I was working in radio at the time, and the first thing I did, you know, I was a techie, but, you know, back then, tech didn't pay you anything.
	You were looked at like the village idiots.
	So, I was working in the radio station, and my first paycheck, I bought a TI handheld calculator, about the size of a credit card.
	And, you know, I whipped that thing out.
	Man, I'm the biggest nerd in the room.
	And it was instant respect.
	Ooh, ah! That and your digital watch.
	Well, I didn't have to spend a four-day calculator.
	So, my mother had passed me.
	Earlier, well, it was last year.
	I was cleaning her house out.
	And I found that calculator.
	Because I gave it to her after, you know, there was bigger and better things.
	You know, the more zeros and the more commas you could calculate, the bigger the geek you were.
	So I gave her my old one.
	And I found that.
	And it has to be every bit of 45 years old.
	I turned it on, it was working.
	I'm like, you know, Ross Perot and David got it right the first time.
	But, you know, what they're doing with technology, it's just setting up for films, not doing anything like we used to be able to do, where you had longevity to it.
	Yeah, and it was a big leap.
	You know, when I got into engineering, they had just...
	Approved for use. For the students, they could use calculators instead of using a slide rule and having, you know, carry around with you a slide rule and a book with tables and extrapolate between.
	And so, you know, it was like, oh, this is great.
	And it really was, you know, and it was very useful and helpful.
	And so they had TI programmables and they had HP programmables.
	I think HP's put themselves out of business now, but I got the HP it had Rpn in it remember that a reverse Polish notation basically It was a stack and and so you do the operatives in a different order and everything but it was it was a lot of fun and you had a great great time with that stuff and Remember going into classes and they have this giant a couple of them They have giant slide rules on the wall that were maybe
	about five or six feet long. So the professor People had to do it like why sure I'm glad I didn't start this a year too earlier You know, it's great timing to miss out on that stuff.
	But yeah, it used to be that technology was something that was very useful and directed to you.
	I remember the other thing that was happening right about that time was the revolution in personal computers.
	And you were involved in that as well.
	But, you know, the thing is, they had centralized computers, and it was such a hassle to use them.
	And then you had computers that would sit there and wait for you, instead of you sitting there and waiting for the computer.
	But now it's completely the other way around.
	They're using technology in every regard to surveil and to control us, not to serve us.
	That's right. You know, you said that.
	I was employee number 30 at Compaq back in the day.
	Wow. And you know, what we built back then is now what we call smartphones.
	But I remember one day, this is a great story, because this is where they're going wrong with technology.
	This is before Compaq went out, you know, really hit the market.
	And we were trying to build the ultimate machine.
	And we did a lot of things.
	We smoked things we weren't supposed to smoke back then, but it helped us in the lab.
	So we got the bright idea.
	Let's shock test the prototypes.
	Well, we grabbed about four of the prototypes and went up to the roof, and we were throwing them off the roof, shock testing them.
	Rod Canyon, the CEO, drove up.
	I swear I've never seen a man have a nervous breakdown in the middle of a parking lot.
	But, of those computers that we threw off the roof, four of the five survived.
	Now, can you imagine throwing any kind of electrical device off the roof nowadays and expecting it to survive?
	That's right. That could have been a marketing thing right there.
	See, it's not a bug, it's a feature.
	You know, we can drop these things off the roof and have a certain percentage of them survive.
	Well, one of the vice presidents walked in and we were bowling with them.
	I mean, we had a hallway that we were using them like bowling balls to see if they were surviving.
	But, you know, Nobody does that anymore.
	It's like it's a piece of junk.
	You drop your iPhone on the floor, it's going to break.
	And, you know, this is the type of stuff that the longevity of things as opposed to what we seem to be doing now, which is totally wrong.
	You think about these brain chips.
	You get one of these put in.
	Well, you know, I'm on that subject.
	I remember.
	You were talking about DARPA. I was part of the MemeX program, which was...
	The big web server, the one that looks at everything on the web search, that looks at everything on the internet.
	Well, at the time, parallel to it was a DARPA Brain Initiative.
	And I had the clearance and these type things where, you know, you're not talking about that.
	I used to slip over there and read and watch and see what worked and what didn't.
	So when I'm talking about these chips, And what they're doing, this was 2013, 2014, I already had a glimpse of what was coming.
	Something dawned on me with these COVID shots.
	You know how they're pulling all these sinews and this white rubbery stuff out of these people's wings and stuff?
	It dawned on me.
	This is the threading that will go from The chip to the person's antenna, which, as it stands right now, will be the tattoos.
	Wow. And that nanotech lost control, or they lost control of it.
	Something lost control, and it didn't stop building at thread status.
	And it just kept building until it plugged into these veins and arteries.
	Wow. This nanotech that's in these people from these shots, it's almost gone rogue.
	Yeah, yeah.
	As a matter of fact, it's kind of interesting because you look at their key technologies, genetics, robotics, artificial intelligence, and nanotech.
	The acronym to remember that is GRAIN. But they talk a great deal now about genetics, always talking about genetics, always talking about robotics, always talking about artificial intelligence.
	But what they don't talk about is nanotech.
	And I think, you know, that dog that's not barking right now, The fact that they're not talking about nanotech, that's a big deal.
	And it's interesting that you had mentioned that because I think that's very significant.
	We had in Japan, they threw out first 1.2 million doses of this genetic code injection, and then they threw out an additional million.
	And what happened was, and I don't know if these things were not properly refrigerated or what it was, but they started noticing black particulates in it.
	That would react to magnets.
	And so they just trashed a couple, like two and a quarter million doses of this stuff because they had magnetic particulates come out of the vaccine.
	They're precipitated.
	Yes. Yeah. That was like graphene oxide.
	Yeah, exactly. Yeah.
	And, uh, but you know, I don't...
	Me, I can't do it.
	I mean, if someone went through one of these big, fabulous things in front of me, I'm going to squeal like a 12-year-old girl and go, eww, eww, get in the way.
	But one of these...
	Well, they're pulling these things out of dead people because it killed them.
	Like you said, it's like nanotech.
	That's always the thing about nanotech.
	They're talking about what happens with nanotech Self-reproducing and very small.
	What happens if we can't stop it?
	And it doesn't run away. And they say, well, just to get this gray goo.
	And maybe you're right. Maybe that is what is happening with these.
	Well, you know, it has run away.
	But these undertakers and people that are dealing with this, one thing I would like to see, and it would be the smoking gun and be an end all on proving this is, they send an electrical charge to it and see if it will conduct electricity.
	Yeah, that's right.
	You see, if it will handle a little 9-volt charge that are even smaller, it's a minuscule amount of electricity, but something that could verify it, that would leave no doubt that this was this threading system that they have planned for these brain chips.
	It'd be interesting to know what the resistance is across it, wouldn't it?
	Yeah, I would. And that's my point.
	If it's conducting an electrician, you've got some explaining to do, Pfizer.
	No, they don't have to explain anything.
	They'll just say, it's rare.
	It's not happening. I don't care what you see.
	Don't believe your eyes.
	I'm the FDA. I'm Fauci.
	I'm Trump or whatever. I'm going to tell you what this is about or Biden.
	It truly is amazing.
	And yet, you know, getting back to this brain chip thing and what Rand Corporation is now saying, you know, they'll say eventually when they're ready to roll something out, they'll finally admit what they're doing.
	You've seen this stuff happening for a very long time.
	Yeah. Oh, yeah.
	Getting back to Annie Jacobson, and she was talking about some of these agencies.
	She said, you know, you have this one agency, and it was involved in launching satellites and all this kind of stuff.
	Huge agency. And nobody knew it existed for decades.
	You look at the NSA. For the longest time, people would say it's no such agency.
	It doesn't even exist.
	We're not even going to acknowledge its existence and that type of thing.
	But they keep these agencies. Even entire agencies.
	One guy was bragging about it.
	He said, we had 10,000 people that were involved in this project and not one person leaked it.
	And he said, well, actually 10,001 because we had Tom Clancy involved as well.
	I thought, Tom Clancy? You know, Tom Clancy, this is the guy who worked with Steve Buchenek.
	And he was working with this guy.
	He's keeping this big project with 10,000 people.
	He's keeping it secret. It's like, what is going on with it?
	Anyway, but the bottom line is when they start talking about this stuff, it means that they're right on the cusp of putting it out.
	And so now the Rand Corporation is talking about An Internet of Bodies.
	We've always talked about how, you've talked about this for a very long time, all these different medical devices and things that they put on and how they can use that to hook us into the Internet of Things and how we all become more things that they can monitor.
	And so they talk about the Internet of Bodies and they say, well, and then, you know, if we've got an Internet of Bodies, we can have an Internet of Brains as well.
	Elon Musk is actually even talking about this, Gautry, talking about how Social media, for him, is kind of like a hive mind.
	And maybe that is a key part of why he got Twitter, because maybe it isn't just about building his public image with conservatives as Mr.
	Free Speech or something, but maybe it is about this hive mind mentality and being able to monitor what everybody is saying.
	Maybe that's the key part of it.
	Maybe that's the hive mind that he is trying to set up.
	You've got the answer.
	You just haven't applied it to the right application yet.
	That's AI. You see, machine learning, remember?
	Here's the thing.
	This is what it's going to take to drive AI. And You know, I put my cutoff date at year 2000 after Bill Gates failed to do Y2K. I love to remind him of that.
	His first virus pandemic didn't work out.
	Neither did his second one.
	Good going, Bill. Smartest man in the room.
	Let's hope that the surveillance stuff works as good as his search function on Windows.
	I'm telling you, man. That's what I'm saying.
	Failure's good. Yeah.
	But if you took everything that was said, ever been said, published, or put on the internet and put it into an insanely large library to power the AI, AI would be giving you answers by consensus.
	Okay. You just said Elon's trying to turn Twitter into basically an AI form.
	You're right. What better bang for your buck is to buy the largest social media platform there is.
	You're limited, well, except if you want to pay for it, you can post more, but you're limited to a set amount of characters.
	It's perfectly tailor-made to feed AI. Mm-hmm.
	Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.
	You know, you could ask, what is the world's favorite color?
	And it could access all these trillions of replies and referring colors and come up with one that is primarily the most favorite.
	And then it would lie to you about it because it's biased.
	Well, sure. You could do, like, Google and just pre-program it.
	You know, like, hey...
	Let's just program it to give out the results we want.
	Yeah, exactly. Yeah.
	Now, that's not AI. I mean, I'm sorry.
	That there is...
	Yeah. Well, I can't say it on air.
	I mean, you know, everybody can turn around and say, did he really say that?
	But no, this is...
	Google needs to be called out for this.
	Yeah, yeah. It's pure Bolshevik, you know.
	It's a Marxist tactic.
	There's the word I was looking for.
	It rhymes with it anyhow.
	Yeah, that's right. That's right.
	Well, you know, when you look at what they're talking about, though, and as you're pointing out, they've got to scrape all this information to train AI, and then they've got to take the extra step of inputting a bias into it, you know, to make First, it's got to know what the right answer is, and then it's got to be trained to lie to you.
	So they've got a task ahead of them.
	them but when they grab all of this information it's now even being talked about by the Wall Street Journal saying they're calling it inbreeding whereas in the past and other people have talked about it they call it kind of cannibalism and they made the analogy to mad cow disease you know you feed cows other cows and after a while they get this brain disease or humans cannibals they get Yakov Kortesfeld disease which is a human equivalent of
	mad cow but they said you know if the artificial intelligence has to feed on human content on the internet And then the problem is that it's pumping out so much content, once it starts feeding on its synthetic stuff, once it starts bringing in artificial intelligence stuff instead of human stuff to use, then it starts getting really stupid in just a couple of generations.
	It's just like mad cow disease.
	And so they're calling it now, now that Wall Street Journalists, I talked about this months ago, now Wall Street Journalists talking about it, instead of making the reference to mad cow disease, they call it inbreeding, you know, kind of comparing it to the royal family, I guess.
	You know, but it's good to be this inbreeding thing.
	But either way, they've got a real issue because they're pumping out so much content, they're going to be polluting their own data source.
	One could never have enough inbred silicon, you know?
	Yeah, that's right.
	That's what it's going to be.
	And you talk about failure being good.
	That may be the thing that saves us from artificial intelligence is going to be the fact that it It's inbred or it turns into this cannibalism thing.
	If you stop and think about it, you could make the comparison of AI being zombies.
	You know, got to feed on brains.
	You know, brains, I need more brains.
	That's what your brain chip may evolve into.
	That's right. I was trying to remember these.
	In ancient Egypt, they used beetles for when a person passed away.
	It would be upon your gray matter.
	What was it? Scarabs or something like that?
	Yeah, there's a scarab beetle. I didn't know that they ate brains.
	They're really beautiful.
	They're rainbow colored and really beautiful and they have a really ugly existence.
	And that may be what we need, digital scarabs, you know.
	That's right.
	Instead of Trojan horses or viruses, we could have scarabs for the AI.
	Maybe that'll be a thing.
	Maybe you can help make that come true.
	Who knows?
	I don't know about that.
	You know, with the wall of crap that we're having to put up with, I mean, it's like you brought up the ship that ran over the bridge earlier.
	You don't hear any more about it.
	It only happened like two or three days ago.
	That's old news. It's something they've already moved on.
	Can you imagine how old the news is going to be when it's a decade from now and they still haven't built a replacement?
	By then, people will forget there was even a bridge there, as short as our attention spans are getting.
	They'll forget that Baltimore was there, because Baltimore will disappear.
	That may not be a bad idea at the moment.
	Well, except that they're all going to relocate somewhere else.
	It's like smashing an anthill.
	The problem is they're going to reconstitute themselves somewhere else that may be closer to your house.
	Maybe we could rename it like Hollywood or something if they'd all return.
	We don't remember Baltimore, but Hollywood, Maryland, is really a nice place.
	Yeah, right. But all this information overload we're on, it's almost got to the point where people are trying to keep up with it.
	Because I was thinking, okay, how am I going to do your show?
	You know, what are we going to focus on?
	And there is so much out there right now.
	It's overwhelming.
	If you tried to focus on it, you'd almost feel like a schizophrenic.
	Oh, yeah. Oh, I know.
	Tell me about it. You think about what that's going to do to AI. I mean, how can it process the amount of information, disinformation, General nonsense is being hurled at it on a daily basis.
	Yeah, yeah. I mean...
	That's true. Well, you know, when we look at it, I think what is really scary, too, is not only is it their encroachment into our minds and their intention to, you know, take over our minds, literally, connect us to their Internet...
	Because that's a two-way street.
	You know, if you can project your thoughts, guess what?
	They can project stuff into your thoughts as well, right?
	So it's kind of a two-way street there.
	But, you know, the other part of it is robotics and the merger of robotics with artificial intelligence.
	I played a couple of weeks ago a picture of this company called Figure, Figure AI. And they had a very, very impressive robot.
	I mean, this thing had smooth moves, you know, and not this jerky kind of stuff like you see with Disney animatronics or anything like that.
	But, I mean, it had a great deal of dexterity.
	It could pick up, you know, soft, uncooked eggs and things like that, not break them.
	It had a pause.
	It would have to look. You could interact with it because it had chat GPT as a brain.
	But it had incredible dexterity, and it could process and learn from watching humans how to do tasks.
	It could interact with people and kind of draw conclusions and stuff.
	There was a little bit of a hesitation after they talked to it, but it'd come back, and it even had like this kind of...
	You know, California surfer dude way of speaking, you know, and even had like a, well, yeah, you know, kind of that type of deal.
	They even programmed it with that to make it seem more human, even though you're just looking at a faceless glass head.
	But, you know, when you have something like that, now these people are, the guy who did future, sorry, no future, but figure AI, the CEO is now saying that we're going to have these things everywhere.
	They're going to be ubiquitous.
	They're going to be like your cell phone.
	I started thinking about that.
	What could possibly go wrong with that, Goat Tree?
	Oh, nothing. Just forget how to think.
	Just go look up your glass head and talk to it.
	It has the answers. And this thing is going to follow you around.
	This is worse than Orwell.
	Orwell envisioned a big brother eye that's going to constantly be watching you.
	This thing is going to be mobile.
	And it's going to be, you know, metal and strong.
	I mean, it could throttle you if it wants to.
	But, you know, it's going to be your constant companion following you around instead of having your spy device in your pocket.
	Your big brother device, the smartphone, in your pocket, you're going to have some minder bodyguard robot, or more like a prisoner guard, who's going to be following you around everywhere.
	Yep, it goes back to that old saying, we're Yeah, that's right.
	Yeah, it's going to be, again, it's going to be kind of a babysitter, kind of a minder, a constant surveillance there.
	When they had the Snowden tapes and Snowden leaks, and it was only reported in Germany, Der Spiegel, but they didn't show it here in the U.S., so I've shown it over and over again.
	And it was three slides, and they said, who would have thought, in 1984, and they show the Super Bowl commercial.
	And the next slide is Steve Jobs holding up a smartphone.
	Who would have thought in 1984 that this would be Big Brother?
	And they show him holding a smartphone.
	And then they show everybody lined up in an Apple store to buy it.
	And they said that the zombies would line up to pay for it themselves.
	And so I guess they're going to get people to pay for these robots themselves.
	The early adopters will think they're so cool.
	And then they'll probably heavily subsidize these things so that everybody can have their own prison guard.
	Don't you think? Well, yeah.
	I mean... People, you know, I hate to say it.
	Maybe I'm just going rogue.
	I don't know. But people, they start the drumbeat of this cool factor.
	And they condition these people until you must have it.
	Yeah. And by the time it actually rolls out, these...
	It's like, us taxpayers in the U.S., we're funding our own demise, and we're happily doing it.
	It's the same thing with the great big glass-topped edge.
	I don't even know how you're going to cart that thing around, but anyhow.
	Well, it can walk. It can walk.
	Oh, good. Yeah, absolutely.
	I need another stalker.
	It can walk and probably do somersaults on top of you as well.
	Pound you into the ground.
	It's like one of these Boston Dynamics bots that are out there.
	Well, yeah. Some people, they'll be going, I can't wait.
	And they'll probably even turn them into some, oh man, I don't even think about that.
	I'm about to curve out thinking about, hey, give me a big sexy one, you know?
	Like, now we're going there.
	Yeah. Yeah. Oh yeah, there'll be all kinds.
	I mean, you know, you got the people who are into little fantasy stuff, the furry type of people, they'll probably give them like little Pokemon things to follow them around.
	They'll dress them up in all different kinds of ways.
	I knew it.
	I knew it. Yeah. If they're smart, you remember, you go back to look at the Segway, right?
	When the guy, what was his name?
	Was it Dean Common or something?
	I can't remember his name.
	Anyway, he got a whole bunch of Silicon Valley executives together to show them the Segway.
	And Steve Jobs said, that's great, that's really amazing.
	But he said, you got to make it look cool.
	Or people aren't going to buy it. And he said, furthermore, you've got to control the release of this thing, because if you don't, you're going to have some idiot have a really bad fall on it, and that's going to kill the marketing buzz on it.
	Well, it turned out that idiot was George W. Bush.
	And it didn't look cool.
	It looked really stupid.
	I rode one once.
	Karen and I rode all around Chicago once on these things, and we looked so incredibly stupid, but we were having so much fun, we didn't really care.
	Because it's a blast to ride these things.
	You just kind of lean, and you're going about 12 miles an hour in one direction.
	But they do look really stupid in this, and that was what he was saying.
	So they're not going to make the...
	If they've got somebody that's smart...
	Like Steve Jobs. They're going to make them look cool.
	They're going to make them look sexy or playful or intimidating or something like that.
	So the rappers can have a couple of these things following them around all the time.
	Of course.
	And then you have your collector's edition so that you're building up the demand.
	You know, this is a one-off.
	It's only one in existence.
	Yeah. Watching good for it like rare art.
	You know, it's... Yeah, yeah.
	It's just stupid.
	The things that they're trying to push off on the world, I mean, I'm rooting for failure now.
	I mean, I no longer want to build indestructible stuff.
	I'm rooting for failure.
	Yeah. I hope the big last head fails or whatever that we're talking about with that invention.
	Yeah, the figure bot. Well, talking about failure...
	Talking about failure, you got all these fast food companies now.
	The new rage is for them to add artificial intelligence.
	And I wonder how artificial intelligence makes the food taste.
	Does it taste any better? I mean, they're chasing this fad.
	I haven't been to a fast food place in 10 years.
	I could not tell you.
	I mean, I don't even like driving by them because, you know, it's like everybody drives crazy getting in and out of there.
	Oh, yeah. And that's what they're doing.
	They're making them all drive-thrus, right?
	So even Chick-fil-A is setting up now.
	They're opening up restaurants that are drive-thru only.
	And now this is an article from...
	Wall Street Journal, and they're talking about this corporation, Yum, that owns Taco Bell and Pizza Hut and several of these.
	Yeah, and so they're saying that they're going to start setting up, changing their restaurant as a Kentucky Fried Chicken.
	They're going to set it up as a drive-thru type of thing.
	So everything is about drive-thru, but I thought they were also the same people that are trying to ban private cars.
	How's that going to work out? I'm thinking that it'll be the bike lane.
	It is crazy.
	But yeah, that's what they're doing everywhere.
	And I keep looking at this, but I think it's a good example of how these people are not really, they're just chasing fads.
	You know, it's like a corporate fad to add AI to stuff.
	And it's not really going to help the quality of their fast food at all.
	Maybe the AI could come up with something that's more addictive or something, you know, or more unhealthy.
	But it's not really going to help the food.
	And then it comes up with, oh, let's just do drive-thrus when they don't realize they're not paying any attention to the fact that Biden and the company are trying to stop all the cars, including the electric cars.
	None of this stuff really makes any sense.
	You know, if you conceptualize what these guys are saying is, no one's going to have a job.
	No one's going to have a car.
	How are you going to pay for that?
	How are you going to acquire it?
	And then how are you going to pay for it?
	That's right. That's right.
	I mean, you know, they're making themselves obsolete.
	Failure's good. Mm-hmm.
	Mm-hmm. Maybe the global health rebound and people become healthy because they can't access the yuck or yum.
	Yuck is more like it.
	It's going to be the new.
	And we see in California, they've got $20 an hour minimum wage for all of the fast food restaurants just went into effect with Newsom.
	And so you know that this is going to push replacement of the employees with robots and other things like that.
	And as you're just saying, who's going to buy their food, right?
	Already you've got a lot of these fast food chains are saying, well, we're seeing a drop off.
	Even in the cheap fast food stuff, we're seeing a drop off because a lot of our people can't afford it anymore.
	And this is only going to raise the price up, so they're going to, you know, fire people and replace them with robots.
	So again, are you going to have robots going through the drive-thru to get something to eat?
	No, they're not going to do that. Henry Ford said he wanted to have an automobile that his workers could afford.
	They don't think like that anymore.
	They don't want us.
	The future doesn't need us.
	The future doesn't want us.
	And these futurists don't want or need us.
	Well, and then that brings us to digital currency.
	Okay, you don't need a job.
	We'll just replenish your wallet every month or whatever.
	And, you know, suddenly, where are we at?
	This is something.
	It kind of goes off the grid for a moment, but then it brings it back into this subject.
	And this is the big threes, maybe even the big four, that people don't realize is Well, also with the backs.
	I mean, you can even throw this into it.
	But the leaders in Washington, the leaders on the state level, the local level, the ones that are advocating abortions, They have Americans killing Americans.
	I mean, the next generation.
	You know, they're always about sustainability.
	Well, this is not sustainable.
	That's right. That's right.
	And this is sociological engineers coming up with this stupidity, just like fast food.
	And then, if you do have a child that manages not to get aborted and you raise it five years old, And you put it in a public school.
	They're doing their dead-level best to scramble the kids' brains with all these transvestites.
	I don't even call it transgender.
	This is just so stupid.
	It's mental illness. And if your kid does finally manage to survive all that mental torture, And manage not to come out to be self-loathing and, you know, know which restroom to use and if it's a boy or girl and what species it is.
	You know, they had messed up our society so bad.
	They're even trying to kill us off with the vaccines.
	That's right, yeah. They try to sterilize us mentally, and if they can't do that, they sterilize us physically.
	They can use our food, they can use the medicine, but it is a mass psyop of sterilization.
	To hate other people, not even just the other sex, the other gender, but they want you to hate being around other people completely.
	Yeah. I had an article last week of a woman who has been wearing her mask now for four years.
	She doesn't want her grandkids around her.
	She said they're little germ monsters.
	They get everybody so OCD with all this stuff.
	They hate other people, and they just want to live their life alone and live their life, again, through the Internet and just hook up that way and live vicariously that way.
	You may have a point about this.
	She may have a point about kids.
	They are pretty nasty.
	They have their strong points as well.
	It is interesting to see this program and how they have gotten traction on it.
	And of course, it was very key.
	To have everybody locked down in 2020, to get everybody a taste of universal basic income, I think that was one of the amazing things to me, was how long this went on and how easy it was to train people to take a handout.
	I mean, it's like the pacified, you know, just like you take a wild animal and train them to, you know, be hand-fed.
	And they did that to people very quickly.
	Yeah, they did that to people very quickly.
	They've got the American public domesticated and so servile that...
	You know, I honestly think you could do pretty much anything you wanted to the general populace, and if you've got a good enough excuse or narrative, the people will go along with it.
	You know, it's crazy.
	And then... If this isn't bad enough, this is our own government that is orchestrating this.
	This is not a government for the people or by the people.
	They're bringing in replacements.
	They made such a mess of our society and what they've done to the citizenry.
	They're bringing in replacements who don't have abortions and who don't go along with this stuff.
	And we're going to have one Yeah.
	Well, they want to have different cultures, different languages, different groups of people who, as they collapse the system, are going to start fighting each other instead of fighting them.
	That's the key thing. They've got to have us fight.
	Fighting each other instead of fighting them.
	And that's what I think is really in store this year in the politics.
	You know, they want everybody focused around the two guys who have been rolling this program out for the last four years on us.
	But we got to have one of the two of them.
	And it's all about their personalities.
	And look at how everybody this far away from the election, how much everybody hates the guy in the other party from them.
	It truly is amazing.
	But that's what they're training us for.
	They're pushing us into an ethnic civil war as they pull down society.
	That's exactly what they want.
	And, you know, here's something that people don't think about with this.
	And it's a very real scenario.
	No one seems to conceptualize this.
	This would be the end if we had a civil war.
	Because we're out here killing, enslaving, whatever they have envisioned, each other creating a power vacuum.
	And guess who's going to slip in there on that vacuum?
	It's either going to be China, Mexico, we don't have to worry about Canada, but maybe Russia or Canada.
	I think they have their own issues at the moment.
	So, You know, yeah, let's have the Civil War.
	And in the end, it's not going to turn out the way people envision.
	No, no. But if it attracted our politicians and bureaucrats, it's not going to turn out the way they envision.
	That's right. You know, failure's good here.
	Well, we live in interesting times, and they're going to get even more interesting at an accelerating rate, I think, as we head into the last...
	This next term of whoever it is that's president, they're going to take us right up to the end of the fourth turning.
	and they're going to take us through collapse.
	And either Biden or Trump could do it, or LaLa Harris.
	They'd be perfect for this role.
	They've already gone through the vetting.
	They already know these people can perfectly manage to collapse our society.
	So that's what they're going to try to do.
	And so that, to me, it just underscores how we've got to get more focused on our own lives, how we've got to prepare for it.
	We've had already some forward-looking state legislators.
	Here in Tennessee, we've got Senator Nicely.
	In Utah, they've just set up some new laws that are going to allow the Utah state government to start accumulating gold to protect themselves against the financial weaponization of a centralized digital currency and other things like that, and to the possibility of financial collapse.
	And so you've got a lot of different states.
	There's several of them here in the Southeast that are looking at this.
	You've got Utah, which is just one guy has been very active there.
	Ivory is his name, and just like nicely here, he's put in several bills that are going to make it so the state and individuals, it's easier for them to use gold and to have gold as a As a counter to what's going to be done by the Federal Reserve.
	So you have people who do see what's coming, but if we see it, we've got to make those moves ourselves, really, to try to protect that.
	Yeah, but, I mean, if this goes off the way that they're saying, you know, it's going to, you're going to, you know, I hate to even say it, you're going to have to cut off The head of the snake.
	You're going to have to have your ruby ridges.
	You're going to have to have your Branch Davidian incidents.
	You're going to have to...
	Oh, man, I don't even like saying this stuff.
	You're going to have to eradicate, one way or another, I don't mean terminally, but I mean this thought process of these politicians and these bureaucrats who have led us to this point.
	They haven't. They have to be punished.
	They have to be removed from power.
	And things need to be re-established to represent the citizens.
	It no longer does that.
	I know we're supposed to be talking about tech.
	But you can look at just right now the news feed.
	Let's take Easter, the oyster rabbit.
	He did say oyster when he meant to say Easter.
	Yeah.
	All hail the great oyster rabbit.
	Ha ha ha ha ha.
	He, there's all this transgender stuff being pushed on us.
	And, for the life of me, I cannot make sense of it.
	Why would you take something that's less than 1% of the United States population and offend about 75% of your voters with it?
	I mean, I would say 50-75% of the citizens in the U.S. identify as Christian.
	So why would you run that risk for less than 1% of the population to offend Christians?
	The majority. Well, I have an idea.
	No matter. I have an idea.
	Because I think this is fundamentally about, you know, making people say 2 plus 2 equals 5.
	And as I said earlier in the broadcast, you have the 2 plus 2 equals 5.
	That's what the tyrants want to do.
	As Solzhenitsyn said, as Orwell said, they want you to live by the lie.
	They want you to lie to yourself, to double think, to say whatever they say, you know, once you accept...
	Two plus two equals five, then they'll give you something else that you have to lie to yourself about and just blindly repeat whatever they say.
	But it's also this idea that it ties in the hedonism that you had with Orwell.
	Not Orwell, but Huxley.
	And so it ties all of that together.
	But it's a very useful construct.
	When you look at...
	From the transgender stuff, they've also got the furry stuff.
	And I think that that dovetails into an augmented reality.
	And people who want to just live their life alone, living on virtual reality, And living on the internet, that's what they're pushing people through.
	I think that's another aspect of this transgender stuff, is to keep people away from having physical contact with the real world, keep them living in a bubble, keep them in a virtual reality where they can get on the internet, their entire existence is on the internet, just like Ready Player One.
	They can be a rabbit their entire life.
	They can be an oyster rabbit or whatever, you know?
	And I think that's a part of it as well.
	What do you think? Well...
	I tend to agree with you on it, but this is so obviously the death of democracy.
	Everybody keeps screaming about democracy, yet you're taking less than 1% of the population, and you're elevating their importance over the majority.
	Oh, yeah. That's not democracy.
	That's right. That's right.
	And if you have a leader in there, I mean, I'm pretty apolitical.
	I think they all are unfit for their office.
	But if you have a leader that is disregarding the beliefs of the majority, that person needs to be removed from office.
	Yeah. And I'm not talking about religious.
	I'm not talking about Any of this stuff that gets you lost in the weeds, I'm talking about the concept.
	We're a republic that runs off democracy.
	When democracy is not being respected, we've got a problem.
	Yeah, years ago, Newt Gingrich, and he was just a politician blowing in the wind and everything, but at least he cared what the majority said.
	I remember him talking about it.
	He said, so you got, and I don't even remember what the issue was.
	He goes, so you got 80% of the people who want this, and you got 20% of the people who want that.
	Well, as a guy who's a politician, I want to go with the 80%.
	But we don't have people like that anymore.
	As you're pointing out, they keep talking democracy, democracy, even though we've got a Republican, we've got a Bill of Rights and things like that.
	They hold democracy up as this great ideal, and yet they don't care.
	They don't care about the 80%.
	They're going to go with the 0.02%.
	Well, I'll say this.
	If this podcast gig don't work out, you really ought to run for Congress.
	Just make my life a total nightmare in hell, right?
	I told Karen, I said, you know, with this abortion stuff happening, I'm tempted to run for Congress and do the same thing that progressive liberal did and say, hey, I'm running for Congress.
	I can show pictures of an aborted baby if I want to, and there's nothing you can do about it.
	Well, I mean, if you did get elected, it'd be totally worth it, because it would restore my faith in democracy.
	Yeah, that would be an interesting thing.
	We'll have to see. Maybe in the future years when things start to wind down, maybe I'll do that.
	Just have the campaign be a single-issue thing and everybody just send in money to fund commercials.
	Somebody else can do it.
	You don't have to wait for me to do it.
	We could use your piss-off scary face as a campaign poster.
	There we go.
	That's it. Well, it's always great talking to you, Goatree, and it always is a blast, and it's great tapping into your experience there with technology, because that's where they're coming at us with.
	You know, it's a technological slavery.
	And you and I have both watched this thing turn 180 degrees around from the point at which technology was a great thing.
	We loved it. It was making our lives better.
	And now it's being turned into a system of slavery, and they're putting these chains on us right now, and people can't wake up to it.
	It truly is amazing. So it's always great to have you on.
	Thank you so much for joining us, Goatree.
	Appreciate it. Thank you very much, David.
	Alright, we'll talk to you later.
	And folks, thanks for joining us.
	And don't forget, davidknight.gold.
	Gold is going up really fast.
	But if you want to have something that's going to be an effective counter to this digital slavery, go to davidknight.gold.
	Let me tell you.
	The David Knight Show.
	You can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	And you want to know something else?
	You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at TheDavidKnightShow.com.

▲