Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 26, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:29

The David Knight Show - 03/26/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds Soon.
	You're listening to The David Night Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it is Tuesday, the 26th of March.
	Tomorrow we have the voting began.
	It will begin the WHO over the international health regulations and the WHO treaty, which will put them in charge of declaring all future pandemics.
	Nothing has been done to change anything that has happened for the past four years in any country other than to consolidate this.
	We're also going to take a look at a new Netflix show that shows what a struggle session looks like.
	Amazing that this is where our colleges and universities are headed very quickly.
	We're going to take a look at that. And the back and forth about Candace Owen being fired by Ben Shapiro is getting really nasty.
	We're going to take a quick look at that as well.
	But we're going to begin with politics and what happened with President Trump yesterday.
	We'll be right back.
	♪ Well, it's kind of interesting, as I said, over the weekend, things are starting to come to a head.
	We had both Trump and his lawyer first saying they didn't have the money, then they said they did have the money, and then yesterday you had a judge saying, you don't need the money!
	Just forget about this.
	And look, I'm not saying that this is legitimate.
	I don't think any of this stuff is legitimate.
	The Eighth Amendment is going to come into play here eventually in some appeals court, and it's kind of interesting, this appeals court panel, All appointed, you know, all in New York as a state court, all appointed by Democrats, basically changed this significantly.
	I don't think any of this stuff is going to hold up.
	I just mentioned, though, That, you know, when we look at this, not to put our hopes in a liar, a man of no character, and to also pay attention to the fact this is happening to little people.
	When little people have their cars stolen, their civil asset forfeiture, their homes, or other things like that, that is a far greater loss than what Trump was contemplating.
	You're looking at what people were saying was going to be a quarter of his net worth that he was going to have to pay.
	People have had everything seized from them by the likes of people like Fannie Willis.
	You're not allowed to have cash.
	I can have stacks of cash at home.
	This kind of hypocrisy is disgusting.
	But the conservatives are only interested in it now when it happens to Trump.
	And as soon as this is over one way or the other, I mean, if Trump continues to lose, they'll continue to bellyache about the fact that it happened to Trump.
	But if Trump, if this is all overturned, as it should be by an appellate court, the conservatives will just go on their merry way and say, well, that's fine.
	I don't care what happens to anybody else.
	You know, we looked after Trump.
	Trump is not standing between you and government.
	He is completely content to allow them to have their way with civil asset forfeiture, with SWAT teaming of homes and all the rest of the stuff.
	He doesn't care about any of that.
	And neither do the conservative media.
	The big cons out there, they never talk.
	About the SWAT teams and the civil asset forfeiture and the rest of the stuff.
	I'll never forget the blank look in Megyn Kelly's eyes when she was interviewing me.
	And I said, no, I'm not a fan of Trump.
	And this was back before even the Sandy Hook lawsuit started.
	And she said, really? Why not?
	And I said, well, you know, things like civil asset forfeiture.
	He's not doing anything about that and all the rest of the stuff.
	She's like, civil asset forfeiture, what is that?
	She's a lawyer. She was paid $25 million or more a year to report on what is happening.
	She could not care less about what happens to the little guy.
	This is why I say, these people are not going to defend you.
	It's important to understand how they're going to attack you.
	It's important to understand the threats that they present.
	And we're going to talk about a massive threat that's about to get signed into, well, not law, But it'll be the pretense of law.
	They'll all pretend that, oh, well, you know, we got this agreement, and they escalated it and changed it, and so now we have to abide by it.
	They will all pretend that that's the legal framework that we all have to abide by.
	So how do you stop this?
	We have to understand what the World Health Organization is doing globally, and you have to stop it locally, locally.
	Not going to stop it in Washington.
	Republicans and Democrats, you hear anything from Republicans about this World Health Pandemic Treaty?
	Nothing. Crickets. They're not talking about that.
	They're talking about issues where they can divide Democrats from Republicans.
	They're part of the divide and conquer.
	They're part of the same group as the Democrats.
	divide and conquer you and split the spoils amongst themselves as they rob us blind and kill us with everything they can imagine. They don't care at all about this because they all stood and they all stood by as I've said many times it's like murder on the Orient Express except it was murder on the warp speed express and all the Republicans along with the Democrats
	had a hand in killing tens of millions of people worldwide.
	That poison was manufactured by us, paid for by U.S. taxpayers, or will be paid for someday if they ever pay the deficit off.
	Or to be paid as the financial system crashes, that may be how we pay off our deficit.
	Anyway, as we look at The back and forth, just to recount, go back over what they had been talking about.
	$460 million. Well, Alina Hava said, not a problem when she was asked, are you going to get some foreign countries to come out?
	She didn't give a clear no.
	You had Martha McCollum-Aster on Fox News.
	Is there any effort on part of your team to secure money through another country, Saudi Arabia or Russia?
	She could have just said, oh, absolutely not.
	That would be against the law. Instead, she said, well, there's rules and regulations, but I can't speak about our strategy.
	That requires certain things.
	We have to follow those rules.
	Like I said, this is manifest injustice.
	It's impossible. It's an impossibility.
	I believe they knew that. So, I don't know.
	You know, there's some rules out there.
	I guess we've got to follow them, I guess.
	And as I said yesterday...
	People over the weekend were saying, this is the dumbest thing he could have done.
	He's got his lawyer down there saying, this is impossible.
	We can't get this. This is outrageous.
	He doesn't have the money.
	And then Trump says, I've got the money.
	It's no problem at all.
	Due to my hard work, my talent, and getting a fortune from my dad, I can pay all this stuff.
	No, he didn't say that. He said, look, look.
	I guess that's, he sees luck.
	Lady luck. Well, Lady Luck wasn't on the side of the casino owner when he had six casinos go bankrupt, so I guess Lady Luck's now on his side, right?
	But anyway, he was boasting about that, and one of the lawyers, the former prosecutor, said, well, you know, he's going to have to go before the judge, and the lawyer's going to have to go before the judge.
	He said, somebody's lying here.
	I would imagine the judge would ask them about that.
	Instead, the judge did not ask him about that.
	One of the things that Trump said during an interview on Fox News, he said, they can't take away your property before you've had a chance to appeal.
	Really? Well, for the little guys, they can.
	Yeah, we don't even get the pretense of a kangaroo court like you did.
	They take stuff away from people without even charging them, let alone convicting them of a crime.
	That's what civil asset forfeiture is about.
	That's why it's so outrageous, and he doesn't seem to care about that.
	They can't take away your property before you've had a chance to appeal.
	But the little guys, they can take away your property before they even charge you with anything.
	They don't ever have to charge you with anything.
	But, you know, it's one set of rules for the Democrats, another set of rules for Republicans, and a third set of rules for the rest of us, isn't it?
	I want to talk about the fact there's two sets of rules.
	Yeah, there's two sets of rules. There's three sets of rules.
	The third group of people, us, they can do anything they want to, too.
	According to them, And so, again, Turley said, and I mentioned this yesterday, he said, well, you know, you've got the Eighth Amendment, which is excessive.
	But, of course, they never look at that with civil asset forfeiture.
	Although, as I'd mentioned before, Darth Vader Ginsburg, just before she died, she threw a lifeline to Trump.
	In a civil asset forfeiture case...
	They went in and confiscated, it's a very expensive vehicle, I think it was a Land Rover, I believe, and they confiscated this from a guy.
	He had bought that with money that he'd inherited from his father-mother who'd passed away, and he could show that he had obtained that legally, but they took that and said, well, I think it has to do with drugs or something.
	And so it went to the Supreme Court, and Darth Vader Ginsburg said, well, that's a violation of the Eighth Amendment.
	You know, even if he had been guilty of this thing, which you didn't charge him or convict him, that would have been excessive punishment.
	So that's kind of a lifeline for Trump.
	I don't think any of this stuff is really going to pass appeal.
	I think he's going to be able to shut all this stuff down.
	But Turley said there's also a due process question.
	The Supreme Court has, on rare occasions, stepped into state cases and said this is sort of an over-the-top damage figure that violates the due process.
	And by the way, it's worth talking about that because so many people, especially the Trump supporters, don't understand that federal policy is implemented by states when they don't have the constitutional authority.
	For example, Jeff Sessions...
	When he wanted to continue to prosecute marijuana, which they never bothered to get a constitutional amendment for, they needed one.
	We know they needed one.
	Everybody understood they needed one when they prohibited alcohol.
	But since he didn't have that, and since we had this naked emperor, Jeff Sessions, who was all stoked up on reefer madness, but since he didn't have any constitutional authority to do it, what did he do?
	He did it through the states.
	Just like they had always planned to run this pandemic through the states with money, with greed, using that as a motivating factor.
	So what they would do is they would tell the state local law enforcement officers, you confiscate property without a conviction, without even charging anybody with a crime, and we'll give you 80% of it, and you give 20% of it to the feds.
	That kind of partnership.
	That kind of partnership is the way they control the schools.
	Money from the Department of Education.
	Put the boys in the girls' shower.
	That kind of partnership is the way that Trump ran the pandemic MAGA people, MAGA-tards.
	You understand that's how it works?
	That's how they do it everywhere.
	How can you be so completely naive?
	You've never been in politics.
	You've never paid any attention to politics.
	You're nothing but a celebrity.
	Hanger on. Bunch of fans of some degenerate celebrity.
	Trump. No wonder Kanye West thought he could run for president.
	People are stupid enough to follow Trump that's stupid enough to follow that guy.
	Because they don't know anything.
	You don't understand the first thing about how government works if you don't understand that they do it by bribery. Bribing people to rob you, to rob you of your business and lock you down. No, they'll pay you money if you lock down their business and tell them they're not essential.
	And it was always designed that way from the very beginning, two months before 9-11.
	The pandemic simulation.
	Lock everybody down until we got an emergency vaccine.
	Then two months later, you have 9-11.
	One week later, you got the false flag of the anthrax attack.
	Two months later, they put out model legislation for all the states to enact statutes to allow them to do what they did in 2020.
	And they practiced it for 20 years.
	Every year. They'd have a germ game.
	The CIA, Johns Hopkins, Fauci, the usual suspects would all run through that stuff.
	And so on rare occasions, the Supreme Court has stepped into state cases where they stole stuff from people without any due process.
	Does Trump care about due process?
	Take the guns, do the due process later.
	Hey, I don't think Trump's buildings in New York are essential.
	Are they really essential?
	We don't need those buildings.
	Trump needs them, but the rest of us don't.
	Take them. Take them.
	Just like he said people on Main Street were not essential.
	Take them. Does he get due process?
	No, I think we take the buildings and we do the due process later.
	That's the thing that's outraging everybody about this.
	Oh, she's going to take these buildings and he doesn't even have a chance to appeal?
	We'll do the due process later, but first we're going to take your stuff.
	What goes around comes around, doesn't it, Donnie?
	Benedict Donald? Oh, you deserve everything that she's doing, even though it's a corrupt system with three different paths.
	Like I said, one for the Democrats, another for the Republicans, and a third one for the rest of us.
	Even though it's an unjust system, you certainly deserve it.
	Just like Peter Navarro deserves to rot in jail for what he did with the ventilators.
	Not for blowing off Congress, but for what he did with the ventilators.
	He deserves to rot in jail.
	No sympathy at all for this guy.
	Well, so here, let's bring this up.
	Yesterday, the judges, a panel of judges, I don't know how many there are here, but they were all appointed by Democrat governors.
	They're all in the state of New York.
	They reduced the bond from what would have been probably over $500 million by the time you add interest, by the time you add, you know, they've got to put down the amount of the fine, plus, you know, actually it's going to be 120%, so plus 20%.
	And so, instead of it being like $500,000, they knocked it down to $175 million.
	It's still a ridiculous amount.
	But he's got it.
	And he says, I'll be paying this.
	And cash or bonds or security or whatever is necessary very quickly within the next 10 days.
	They gave him 10 days to put it through.
	The court did not grant requests from Trump to prohibit the independent monitor or installing an independent director of compliance.
	But, yeah, he's had a pretty good week here when it comes to money because not only did he knock this requirement down to something that he could afford, but he is also about to see his fortune double.
	He's got this thing that he set up to do truth, his social media thing.
	That is going to go public, and it may nearly double his net worth.
	In a financial statement 2021, he showed his net worth as being $4.5 billion.
	People are saying this could be worth $3 to $3.5 billion.
	Very interesting sidebar that's not talked about by Rybart.
	Or others, is the fact that when he put this deal together, there were like three or four other people who were supposed to get a 10% cut on this thing.
	He's cutting them out.
	90% wasn't enough for Trump.
	He's going to cut these guys out and take 100% of it.
	And so, character.
	Character. He is a character.
	He doesn't have character.
	It's like when we talk about people, convictions, right?
	Look at two different ways.
	Do your convictions come from the court, or do they come from deeply held beliefs?
	Okay, those are two different types of things.
	When we talk about convictions and character, he is a character.
	So there's Digital World Acquisition Corporation.
	He's voted to approve the merger.
	On the terms of the merger, he is prohibited from selling shares for at least six months, but the board of directors, which includes His son could vote to allow him to sell these shares earlier than that, but, you know, good day.
	He may double his wealth this week as he sees the fine cut more than in half.
	Not the fine, but the bond.
	Letitia James is saying, well, we've still got the fine and it's still accruing interest and all this kind of stuff, but I don't think she's going to win an appeal.
	I mean, it's a ridiculous thing, especially when you look at the fact that That the appeal judges reduced that radically and didn't even call them out for lying about the fact that they didn't have the money.
	Former RNC Chair Michael Steele says a Trump bond decision, quote, makes absolutely no sense.
	None of this stuff makes any sense except for the fact that we know that the Democrats wanted to run against Trump.
	They may or may not be right about that.
	I think it is going to hurt the Republicans.
	But nevertheless, they have a history of going in and supporting candidates that they think will be easier to defeat in the general election.
	They support them in the primaries.
	And all this stuff with support.
	James Carville, who will tell it like it is, and he's a wise political advisor.
	He's been around for a very long time.
	Thoroughly reprehensible, but he is pretty clever.
	And when they were talking about impeaching Biden, as I said before, he said, how do we get that lucky?
	Have our president impeached?
	That's going to be wonderful for us.
	It's going to get everybody so excited.
	And they know that.
	They know it's going to energize that all these actions, especially as ridiculous as they are, that are taken against Trump, all of those are going to energize his base.
	And they did. And they let him easily win the primary.
	And I think on the long-term scale of things, they don't have any chance of winning unless there is absolutely no justice left in our appeal system.
	Some of these charges have to be taken through the state court rather than through the federal court, but they might eventually be able to get even those into the federal court, but it looks like the state appellate court is not nearly as corrupt as the politicized New York State Attorney General Letitia James or that clown judge that's there locally.
	So, Michael Steele.
	Michael Steele is an interesting character.
	You know, we look at the RNC director, Ron McDaniels, Niece of Mitt Romney.
	And then Michael Steele was there.
	And I remember going to the 2016 DNC, Democrat National Convention.
	Hillary Clinton was running and all the rest of the stuff.
	And I was there in the lobby.
	And this guy comes in.
	There's this big buzz and all of a sudden disturbing everybody.
	Big entourage around him.
	And everybody.
	It's not so much media.
	As it is the people that are there.
	And just this big fan crowd.
	Come over this way, Michael.
	And I recognize him, Michael Steele.
	He was a rock star at the DNC when Hillary Clinton was running.
	And he was the former RNC head.
	You've got Rona McDaniels now who's going to MSNBC. You see, it is a uni-party.
	And these people are perfectly comfortable.
	As a matter of fact, they're more comfortable with the Democrats than they are with Republicans, for the most part.
	And I thought it was very interesting how Michael Steele was so deeply loved by the Democrats, and now here he is working at MSNBC as well.
	And he says, yet again, Trump gets special treatment with his own private system of justice.
	Well, I don't think any of us really has any justice in this country, quite frankly.
	It's looking, like I said, more and more ridiculous.
	And then we get to this part.
	This is one of the reasons why I was talking about character.
	I think one of the key things that is important is the fact that the Republicans are becoming so partisan Becoming so idolatrous of their celebrity that they actively reject any principles, any integrity.
	They don't care whatsoever.
	And here's a perfect example of this.
	This is sent to me by Seth.
	He said, look at this article from the Gateway Pundit about George Santos.
	And if you watch this program, you know that I was opposed to George Santos as soon as his first lies came out.
	And then they just kept stacking on top of each other.
	I said, what is this politics going on?
	Kevin McCarthy was speaker at the time.
	You had Marjorie Taylor Greene saying, we don't want to get rid of him.
	That could hurt our majority here.
	We're in it to win it.
	Well, you know what? You'll never get anything accomplished if you don't have any character.
	If you embrace people who are known liars and grifters like George Santos...
	And yet you see Gateway Pundit and you've got Jim Hoff actually writing the article.
	Jim Hoff is the main guy there.
	This is not some writer who works for him.
	This is Jim Hoff, the guy at the Gateway Pundit.
	Big con media.
	And he says, well, this is a comment from Seth.
	He says, the MAGA cult is so delusional, the fact that they're praising this lying, corrupt fraud, George Santos, just adds more proof.
	But why not? The biggest lying, corrupt fraud leads the cult.
	And lying, fraudulent people like Jim Hoff, Alex Jones, and the rest of them are the ones leading this cult around by the nose with their fake media, the big con media.
	They don't care about, it's 4D chess.
	Yes, Trump is lying, but don't worry, he's not lying to you.
	He's lying to those other people.
	It just seems like he's lying to you.
	You know, he told you he's going to do this and he's doing exactly the opposite, but he's going to come around because it's about owning the libs and he's just setting them up to own them.
	Well, I'm still waiting to see how that worked out in 2020.
	I'm not really sure. How that 4D chess thing was working out.
	Maybe Alex needs to contact me and let me know.
	Can you do that, Alex? Can you tell me how that 4D chess about the pandemic lockdown?
	Can you tell me about that sugar water stuff, that lie that you told everybody that Trump's got a different vaccine, it's just sugar water?
	Tell me how that worked out for us.
	How's that 4D chess going?
	How's that winning going, right?
	Oh, yeah, we're going to keep Biden out by any means possible.
	How did that work? Sometimes it's important.
	Understand that the end does not justify the means, even if you were able to get what you wanted and you didn't get what you wanted in 2020, did you?
	Sometimes you shouldn't lie, cheat, and steal in order to win, because there isn't any place in the universe where lying, cheating, and stealing is winning.
	Not in the long term.
	Not at all. So, the situational ethics, this 4D chess.
	And here's the article from Jim Hoff at Gateway Pundit.
	I am ultra-maga.
	I am trumplican.
	I am a fiscal conservative.
	Well, the three I am's from George Santos.
	Another four he could make himself God.
	He tells Gateway Pundit why he's running as an independent candidate in a New York congressional race.
	And Jim Hoth is just fawning over this guy.
	As I said on day one, throw him out.
	You try to hang on to power by any means, and God does not reward that.
	You know, the people who founded this country said, you know, they just defeated the most powerful government on earth.
	And they said, Franklin, you know, the guy who was a deist for the most part.
	He said, you'd have to be blind not to see God's hand in this providence.
	He said, this is a gift from God.
	Our freedom is a gift from God.
	Do we have anybody who talks like that today?
	No. Nobody.
	Nobody. Not even the people who clothe themselves in the mantle of Christianity like Mike Johnson.
	They don't talk like that. So...
	In his article, Jim Hoff says George Santos was foolishly removed from Congress by a Republican majority, despite their slim lead over the radical Democrats.
	Foolishly removed?
	No, he was finally removed after a long and disgusting, disgraceful delay.
	By the Republican leadership that wanted to hang on to power by any means necessary.
	George Santos, the guy who lied about everything in his life.
	He lied about his sexuality.
	He lied about his ethnicity.
	He lied about his businesses.
	This is a guy, this is a Republican who, they're coming after him alleging that he had committed welfare fraud.
	He lied about everything.
	At one point in time, he says, I'm Jewish.
	And then he comes back and he goes, well, I'm Jew-ish.
	Jew-ish. Like a Jew.
	But I'm not a Jew. Okay?
	So I'm Jew-ish.
	He's also conservative-ish.
	Maybe. I don't know.
	I don't know. Where is this guy?
	As I said, if he'll lie about everything in his personal life in order to get elected, what is he going to do when he is elected?
	Does he have any principles that he can stand by?
	He's another version of Trump, folks.
	And the Republicans love this.
	And people like Jim Hoff, Alex Jones, love this stuff.
	I've always been a conservative at heart, he said.
	Oh, really? The biggest thing for me as a Republican has always been fiscal responsibility.
	I guess that's why he got involved in welfare fraud.
	I am, yes, I am ultra MAGA. I am, yes, America first.
	I am, yes, a Trumplican.
	Maybe it's about time we just accept who we are rather than trying to pretend to be who we are not.
	Boy, truer words are never spoken by George Santos.
	If that's not a Freudian slip, I don't know what is.
	Maybe it's just time we just get honest about who we are instead of pretending to be everything else that we're not.
	Everything in the guy's resume was a bold-faced lie.
	And he has the temerity to stand up to people and be unapologetic about it.
	And then you've got somebody like Jim Hoff who actually cheers him.
	Who actually cheers him. Which is even worse.
	You can look at this and you can say, well, people like Marjorie Taylor Greene and Kevin McCarthy wanted to keep him in, so they keep a majority.
	Well, he's out now. Why put him back in, Jim?
	Why would you support him to be put back in?
	The man has absolutely zero integrity.
	None whatsoever.
	So he says, there's no home in Washington, D.C. for somebody like me.
	No, I'm afraid Washington, D.C. is filled with people exactly like you.
	Exactly like you.
	And Jim Hoff says, oh, I agree.
	You could be on to something.
	You could, I think you could have other individuals come your way.
	They could build a whole movement off of people following fraudulent liars like Trump and George Santos, you think?
	We could call it MAGA. Yeah, that's right.
	George Santos, I think it's about time we break the two-party system fever and we bring in a third and a fourth party into the mix.
	So now George Santos is going to discredit third parties and independents.
	He's discredited the GOP. As a third-party independent, I disown George Santos.
	He does not represent me in any way, shape, or form.
	Okay, so Trump has some big wins that are coming up.
	He did have a loss.
	On the upside, you can tell the third party is gaining traction if we're getting our own grifters now.
	Yeah, serious politicians.
	Yeah, people will lie to get anything they want.
	Before they won't even pay you lip service.
	That's right. That's exactly what we need.
	And the Libertarian Party realized that a couple of elections ago when they got rid of the non-aggression principle.
	Yeah, saying we're not going to initiate the use of force or fraud to achieve social or political goals.
	Well, that's got to go.
	Let's get serious about politics.
	Let's embrace the George Santos philosophy.
	Let's get rid of all these principles.
	That's got to go.
	So speaking of principles, Trump's big hush money trial, the hush money they paid to a hooker, That is set for April 15th.
	A day that will live in infamy for a number of reasons.
	For the rest of us, it'll be for other reasons.
	Anyway, the judge was unmoved by claims from Trump's team that the former president's New York trial should be pushed back.
	Instead, he reiterated that the trial should begin less than a month from now on April the 15th.
	So, there we go. There's going to be a circus to distract you from the fact that the government doesn't really need to have an income tax.
	It doesn't come close to the debt's exploding a trillion dollars every 100 days.
	What do you need an income tax for, right?
	If the income tax was all of our tax revenue, and it's only a small portion of the pie, frankly, most of the tax is coming from other things.
	But why do you need any of these taxes if you really don't care about deficits?
	Right? If you've got the modern monetary theory, MMT, or I like to call it the magic money tree, which is the way the Democrats, this is the economic theory that the Democrats have embraced, the magic money tree now.
	So if you've got something like that, what do you even need to have an income tax for?
	Well, it's there to control us.
	It's there to make sure that we, A, have no upward mobility, solve the lower rungs of the ladder, we have no discretionary income, nothing that we can invest in, Oh, you try to save something back in the day when you could actually make interest on money that you put in the bank.
	Not enough to keep up with inflation, but they would actually pay you something.
	Not today. But back in the day when you could actually make interest, they would try to take that away from you.
	Any investments, if you were able to make any money, they would do their best to take a lot of that away from you.
	But what do you need that for?
	Well, they don't want people challenging them.
	But it also gave them a weapon, a political weapon, to use against their enemies.
	An incredibly complex code.
	And if the law is sufficiently complex, it's the same as having no law at all.
	And so that's why they need the income tax.
	But we'll all be talking about Stormy Daniels and Trump.
	You know, he'll be having his Stormy Weather.
	That's what I played when those charges broke.
	Or was it InfoWars I played?
	I forget.
	Was it Ella Fitzgerald?
	Stormy Weather. The $464 million judgment.
	Plus interest, still stands, and Letitia James is crowing about that, but I think that is going to be, I think that will be overturned.
	James Carville, lashing out at his own party, the Democrats.
	And of course, like I said, this is a guy, he's profane, but he can also be profound.
	In terms of his insights.
	He was the one who said, it's economy stupid.
	Nobody cares what Bill Clinton has done to all these bimbos out there.
	He can rape women. He can sexually assault them.
	He can steal money left and right.
	But as long as they're doing good in the economy, it's economy stupid.
	And he was right. He got real like that.
	Nobody cared. Nobody cared.
	And just like nobody cares about Trump's stuff here.
	But except for his base, it makes him mad.
	But Carville lashes out at the Democrats and their low place in the polls.
	He says it's due to preachy females.
	He got that right.
	They can get pretty preachy.
	We're going to show you what a struggle session in China looked like.
	And that's what this stuff is all patterned on.
	They're actually Marxist females.
	Carville described the Democrats' prioritization of what he calls woke policies.
	Again, they're Marxist.
	It's Marxism. It's a struggle session.
	Of these woke policies as feminine, stating, this is killing us.
	He warned Biden that the black vote was at risk, urging Democrats to change their focus as the general election approaches.
	A suspicion of mine is that there's too many preachy females, he told the New York Times.
	Don't drink beer. Don't watch football.
	Don't eat hamburgers. This is not.
	Oh, it's not. They don't.
	But they're telling you, don't eat this.
	Don't do that. Don't watch football.
	This is not good for you.
	So the message is too feminine.
	Everything you're doing is destroying the planet.
	You got to eat your peas.
	I'm going to link this up.
	I'd probably be a pretty good little evergreen clip.
	He says, if you listen to the Democratic elite, NPR is my go-to place for that.
	The whole talk is about how women and women of color are going to decide this election.
	I'm like, well, 48% of the population that vote are males.
	Do you mind if they have some consideration?
	Not at NPR. National Progressive Radio.
	Garble said the Republican presidential nominee Trump projects energy, he said, compared to Biden despite being insane and criminal.
	So is it Trump that's insane and criminal or Biden?
	Well, actually it's both, right?
	No, he was saying that Trump has more energy despite being insane and criminal.
	Biden has less energy despite being insane and criminal.
	So that's where we are today.
	He says...
	Yeah, Trump's got word salads, but he projects energy.
	Yes, the projection.
	That's the important thing, right?
	The projection. So, if you want to see what preachy Marxists look like, and you want to see what a struggle session looks like, there is a Netflix show that dropped, I think it was last Thursday, maybe. And it's actually a science fiction film.
	It's called Three Body Problem.
	And it was written by a Chinese writer, a science fiction piece, and it won a lot of awards.
	And it's kind of interesting.
	Netflix decided that they would do it as a science fiction series.
	And so the first one of these opened up.
	And the guy who is doing it as a series is the same guy who put together HBO's Game of Thrones.
	So he knows how to make a hit show.
	Never saw that, but I know that everybody was crazy about it.
	Anyway, so he takes this Chinese science fiction, and I think the interesting thing is this scene here that I'm going to show you about the struggle section, when he did it in China, this Chinese writer, because censorship and struggle sessions and all the rest of this stuff are still there.
	Still there. And because of that, he put this scene in the middle of his novel.
	Hoping that the sensors would give up before they got that far.
	And it worked. And it got out, but when he talked to people afterwards, he said, well, actually, that should have been at the beginning of the book, but I put it in the middle of the book so they wouldn't notice it.
	And so when they did this science fiction thing, they put it at the very beginning of the show.
	So here's what a Chinese struggle session looked like under Mao's Cultural Revolution, the thing that we were warned about by Xi Van Fleet, remember, had her on?
	Excellent interview. She wrote a book called Mao's America, A Survivor's Story, A Warning to America.
	And so in it, she talked about that.
	She said all this stuff that's happening, all this stuff they call woke is Marxism.
	She said the fact that you have to not only agree with them, but you have to denounce yourself.
	Oh, that is going straight back to the struggle session.
	And so I'll describe this for the people who are listening, because we have a lot of people who listen.
	And there's the interview Travis pulled up there.
	The interview is, Mouse America Survivor's Warning.
	And when was that out?
	That was, let's see, four months ago.
	Okay. So you can find that on the different archives, Rumble, BitChute, other places like that.
	Mao's America Survivors Warning, but it begins with an interview because it'll probably pull up her book there, but a very good interview with her.
	She knows exactly what is happening.
	We've had this happen with people who come here from Europe or people who come here from Germany or Korea or China.
	They've seen this stuff happening.
	They know exactly what this is.
	They can smell it as it's developing.
	Folks, these people in the universities are not doing anything new.
	They are recycling the same thing that was done by Stalin, same thing that was done by Mao, and we're going to wind up living in a society like that if we don't shout these people down.
	You've got to speak up.
	Say something about this.
	Don't play. The worst thing you could do is to play by their rules.
	But that's what they're doing to the kids in college, and now they've moved it down into the junior high school, high school even down to elementary school to indoctrinate these kids at an early age.
	And it's one of the reasons why Gen Z is really generation zombie because of this type of deliberate Marxist programming that's going on there.
	Without any more ado, let's take a look at the struggle session and I'll narrate this for the people who are listening.
	Sweep away the monsters and the demons, it says.
	Everybody is cheering. And they got a little stage here.
	Somebody with a dunce cap on.
	I am a counter-revolutionary.
	I beg you to rehabilitate me.
	The crowd screams, strike down the counter-revolutionary.
	Then they drag this guy off for more beatings.
	Here's another guy. His face is bloodied.
	He's got a dense cap on.
	They're shouting their slogans, their Marxist slogans.
	Rebellion is righteous, righteous.
	Revolution is just.
	Now, as they're screaming all this stuff, the camera focuses around on his daughter who is watching this.
	She says, Father, are you a professor of physics?
	He says, you should know.
	You are my student. Oh, that made him mad.
	The crowd shouts, you know, you are my student.
	In your physics course, do you teach the theory of relativity?
	Relativity is one of the fundamental theories of physics, he says.
	How can a basic survey course do this?
	She says, you lie.
	Einstein was an imperialist.
	was he helped the Americans build the atomic bomb.
	Ring up his wife!
	She is a genuine physicist.
	And here's his wife.
	Her mother, that's her mother and her father, and now the mother is going to denounce her husband in order to survive.
	With the help of the revolutionary youth, it's become clear to me, I want to stand on the side of the people.
	I'm gonna get you!
	I'm gonna get my time.
	Bow your head, they tell the physicist, and he doesn't bow.
	She strikes him. The wife says you cannot deny you lectured on the counter-revolutionary Big Bang Theory.
	He says it's the most possible explanation for the origin of the universe.
	Even he can be wrong.
	Lies, she said. The theory claims to know when time began.
	Time began, she said.
	What came before time.
	It leaves open a place to be filled by God.
	Yeah, it does. Are you suggesting God exists?
	Science has given no evidence either way.
	It says. Well, even he can be wrong, like I said.
	But they're all shouting down with a Yi.
	This is not Yi West.
	This is Yi East, I guess.
	Rebellion is just. Revolution is righteous.
	And they're all shouting. And so then this...
	This woman comes over and starts beating him, this young woman.
	And she literally beats him to death right there on the stage.
	And we'll stop it at that point.
	China's Cultural Revolution In which a physics professor is violently beaten to death by Mao's red guard.
	And it was a preachy woman who was doing the beating.
	James Carville was right about that.
	I'm just going to cut in real fast.
	I think the most interesting thing about that scene to me is when the wife says, I choose to stand with the people.
	She doesn't phrase it as I stand on the side of truth or anything like that.
	She's like, I'm standing with the side of the masses.
	I'm with the people who will kill me if I don't stand with them.
	That's right. That's right.
	Yeah. I stand with a mob.
	The mob. And that's where we are today, folks.
	You know, it's... Before, one of the things I didn't mention as we were looking at that is the camera was panning there.
	Everybody's got their arms up in the air and everything.
	And the daughter has her arms down like that picture we see of the guy in that crowd where everybody's doing the Heil Hitler Nazi salute, except one guy.
	And they eventually got him.
	So anyway, this is the guy who did Game of Thrones when he was asked about this.
	He denied that the show is commenting on cancel culture, while at the same time he admitted that the similarities are, quote, hard to ignore.
	Well, they're hard to ignore because it's exactly the same thing.
	Exactly the same thing.
	History doesn't repeat, but it rhymes.
	And boy, I tell you, they are rhyming in meter and verse and everything is rhyming with this stuff.
	The much-discussed sequence takes place in 1966.
	It shows a struggle session at Beijing's University where the physics professor is beaten to a bloody pulp, beaten to death, after he refuses to renounce Einstein's theory of relativity.
	His wife is also brought out to denounce his counter-revolutionary and his imperialistic ideas.
	You see, imperialism, oh, well, that was the royal Chinese that we just overthrew, the nationalist Chinese that we overthrew.
	And so it has to be, you know, the villains have to be the people that are perceived to be in power, the people who are perceived to be the old order.
	Here in America, oh, that's white people.
	So denounce your white privilege instead of denounce your imperialist connections.
	This isn't a commentary on cancel culture, he told Hollywood Reporter, the guy who put this.
	I don't know if he didn't identify him as a director or producer.
	But anyway, he says, but we do tend to move in cycles in terms of human history.
	And we're going through a certain period of a cycle right now.
	Yeah, the fourth turning. There are many very significant differences between the current time and the Cultural Revolution.
	But there are also some similarities.
	You notice how he downplays that?
	It's exactly the opposite.
	There are many very significant similarities and there's some differences.
	He says just the opposite. He said there's some similarities and very significant differences.
	No, it's mostly similarities. It was never something that we were like, well, we should do this show because we want to make a commentary on that.
	But it is interesting, he said, that the parallels are there.
	And they are hard to ignore.
	Because this is the pattern people like Pete Booty Gay, Pete Booty Marks, and others have followed.
	And it was always, when he went to Harvard, his mentor there, Sokban Berkovich, right?
	Berkovich. He was always, always focused on Christianity as being the great evil.
	We've got to get rid of this Puritan ethic and this Protestant work ethic and this Puritan ideas.
	Everything is about that influence of that idea.
	We must purge it out of society.
	And of course, they always attack religion.
	Whatever the predominant religion is, whatever the predominant group is, that has to be destroyed.
	Their culture has to be destroyed.
	It has to be denounced. And you must denounce it.
	You must be anti what you are.
	So the film is a three-body problem.
	They said they didn't shoot the sequence in China.
	China, why? Well, because China would not tolerate that to this day.
	Still totalitarian.
	So they shot it at Shepparton Studios in the UK. By the way, Netflix is also not available in China.
	It's one of the reasons why they put that in.
	Can you imagine Paramount, you know, who kowtowed to the Chinese communists over things that appeared in Top Gun and other things like that?
	Oh, you've got a jacket that's got Taiwan on the back of it?
	Take that out and things like that.
	Or you're not going to distribute this in China?
	Well, Netflix is not going to be able to distribute this stuff in China anyway.
	And so when they don't have the bribes and the money strings attached to it, We'll show you a little bit of the truth in all of that.
	So, the series is based on novel, as I said before, science fiction.
	Cultural revolution scenes took place in the middle of the story because he's trying to avoid the censors, but he said that it belonged at the front of the story.
	They've now put it at the front of the story.
	By the way, I looked at the trailer and what I could glean from this Chinese science fiction thing.
	It's another one of these alien visitation things.
	But they throw in climate change as well.
	They got the climate change paranoia in there as well.
	The three-body problem is like there's three suns and when they align, you know, there's other planets that are involved in all this that get discovered by these Chinese physicists and they're...
	Because the alignment of these various suns, it affects the climate.
	That's the only thing that's different. It's not done by you cooking with a gas stove.
	It's done by multiple suns.
	So I said, you go through these periods where the climate is stable for these other life forms that are there that come in these aliens.
	But then they go through periods of climate chaos and And they have evolved so that they can turn into a roll of canvas during the bad climate chaos.
	I will not be watching this, by the way.
	I don't have enough barf bags.
	Some people sat there popping popcorn.
	I'd be barfing into a bag watching this stuff here.
	So I guess when things get really bad, they turn into a climate study.
	They turn into a climate model.
	How about that? And then kind of hibernate through it and then come back out.
	And so they move in alien visitation along with climate paranoia and fear.
	But at least it doesn't seem to be man-made climate change.
	That's the only thing you can say for it.
	The use of young college-age students as zealous enforcers of radical left-wing ideology.
	Well, that's exactly what is happening here, isn't it?
	This is why...
	I talk about them as being useful, youthful idiots.
	Because that's what they are. They always get these college kids in.
	They don't have the life experience and the judgment to figure out what's going on with that.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break.
	And before we do, oh, it's good to see you there.
	Audi, Modern Retro Radio.
	Thank you very much. I appreciate your support.
	Again, Modern Retro Radio is, you can get news.
	Well, not news. You get music.
	I don't know. Do you have I know you've got a lot of music, and I know you've had independent film festivals there as well.
	But he says, thank you for your fair analysis and Christlike Behavior Day.
	Well, thank you very much, Audi.
	I appreciate that. And folks, thank you for the tip on Rockfin.
	Please like the stream.
	That helps us as well.
	We constantly are getting people to write us an email saying, oh, I didn't know you were still around.
	Snake Plissken, you still alive?
	I'm far from Snake Plissken, but they think that I'm dead, just like Snake Plissken.
	They thought he was there.
	Oh, by the way, this would not apply to Audi.
	I did not announce this, but...
	Where is my sheet?
	Here it is right here. We're at the end of the quarter, and we're kind of just got a few days.
	It looked like we were doing pretty good about the halfway mark, but then things kind of tailored off for the most part.
	And so this was sent to us by Marty, who has in the past helped us with matching donations.
	And he sent this around Christmastime.
	And a very generous donation.
	What he did was he said, I will, here's a coupon that you can redeem.
	And he set this up.
	I don't know if you can see that or not.
	But he's got four little handwritten coupons there.
	And so he's got spring of 24, summer, autumn, winter of 24.
	And he agreed to do $500 matching.
	On a quarterly basis. So he gave us $2,000 for the year.
	It's absolutely amazing. Thank you, Marty.
	I really do appreciate that. And then he's got them set up like little coupons.
	And he says on the side, genuine David Knight and Wise Wolf pens played their graphic roles in this.
	Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
	So thank you very much, and we're going to use that coupon today.
	So if anybody would like to tip, he will match that, and I really do appreciate that.
	And so if you'd like to do that, please do.
	And if you don't have any money to tip, please like the stream, because that helps us to be seen by other people.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
	Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing.
	Check out the jazz channel at APS radio.com and the APS radio app and leave the stress behind behind.
	I'm going to play you a little bit of the song.
	So apparently about 1 a.m.
	last night, a container ship called the Dolly hit the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore and took it out.
	It's in the river now, and there are multiple cars that fell in.
	I believe they were looking for upwards of 20 people.
	Wow. Maybe as low as seven.
	Wow. Wow.
	I remember when that happened in Tampa Bay.
	They had the Skyway or something like that.
	It was a really long bridge that went up really, really high.
	So they didn't have to raise and lower it.
	But a barge came through and hit one of the foundation things, nevertheless.
	And you had some Skyway Bridge, I think is what it was called.
	I think it connected Tampa to St.
	Pete. I didn't use that. But a lot of people do the commute on a daily basis.
	Pull that back up again. What does it say here?
	Ship loses power, then starts smoking.
	What closed-circuit TV and marine tracking tells us about the bridge collision?
	Well, it truly is horrific.
	I've seen some posts saying that it lost power twice before it started smoking, and then it hit the bridge.
	Hmm. So it could very well be something as simple as the crews didn't do enough maintenance on the ship, something burned out and it crashed into it.
	Yeah, yeah. The interesting thing is that the CEO of the company that owns this ship had complained about this harbor a few years ago about how it wasn't up to what is needed as sea traffic has increased over the years.
	Well, that's going to be, Baltimore is a mess in terms of traffic anyway.
	But that is sad to, that's going to make it a lot worse for quite some time.
	But sad to see the loss of life there.
	What a horrible way to die.
	But let's follow the exploits of Lala Harris here for something a little bit lighter.
	She went down to Puerto Rico.
	And she came out, and as she was coming out, they started playing some music, singing songs.
	Oh, she thinks this is great.
	Everybody's clapping, so here she's giggling.
	And so she starts clapping as well, and nodding her head and all the rest of the stuff.
	And the guy with her is clapping, and so she starts clapping.
	What they're doing is they're actually chanting Protests against her and the guy that's with her is clapping and She's clapping until her interpreter there explains to her what this is really about Telling her that they're saying we want to know Kamala what you come here for We want to know what you think of the colony. They want their independence there or statehood or whatever
	Of course, they are getting a lot of money. But anyway singing protest songs against her She mindlessly claps like a seal and dances along Then the awkward moment where her aid has to tell her what this is really about But I think the picture, pull the picture up there, the still picture.
	The guy who starts clapping, he's got kind of a sly look on his face as he looks over to her.
	He knows that she doesn't know what they're saying because it's in Spanish.
	He starts clapping and then she just claps along and he's got kind of a sly look on his face.
	But... There were also lyrics like, Kamala Harris, war criminal.
	There he is, looking at her.
	U.S., genocidal, the rest of this stuff.
	So, we want to know what you think of the colony.
	By the way, it was in Jamaica, not Puerto Rico, where her family owned slaves.
	Her father bragged about that.
	So, talk about somebody who's a colonizer.
	I guess that would be her.
	Secretaries of State won't explain their coordinated effort to fight what they say is a common adversary in 2024.
	They talk about their coordinated effort.
	They talk about their common adversary.
	So who would that be?
	This is picked up by the Federalist.
	Michigan's Secretary of State, in an interview, said that she and other state election chiefs spent 2022 working to build a team to fight a common adversary.
	So they wanted to get that information from her.
	Well, you know, what is it?
	And they contacted some of the other state attorneys general.
	Several secretaries of state and key battlegrounds will not disclose what their apparent plans for a, quote, coordinated effort to fight a, quote, common adversary entail.
	Ahead of the 2024 election, despite repeated inquiries from the Federalist, Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson recently revealed what she described as a mass collaboration between six battleground states.
	She said, we learned to semi-coordinate with each other in 2020.
	Katie Hobbs and I, Katie Hobbs has gone from Secretary of State to Governor in Arizona.
	Katie Hobbs and I, she was Secretary of Arizona at the time.
	She and I were friends and we would talk regularly, but there was really no way for us to consistently as a team, the six of us, and those six battleground states of Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia, there wasn't any way for us to constantly both compare notes and also say, okay, how are we going to respond to this nationally coordinated effort with a coordinated response?
	So, she's talking about a conspiracy, isn't she?
	You know, all conspiracies have to be illegal, but it was a conspiracy.
	Conspiracy means that you're literally breathing together with other people.
	You're literally planning to do something.
	Now, if that is a crime, and, you know, usually the FBI, law enforcement...
	Whatever is done, unless it's an assassination of a president or a mass shooting event, it's never one person acting alone.
	In those cases, it always is, we're told.
	But in any other crime, they're always going to pull other people in and charge them with being a co-conspirator.
	And so you get charged with Crime X and a conspiracy to commit Crime X. Then they'll charge you with crime Y and a conspiracy to commit crime Y. But this is a conspiracy.
	Like I said, not necessarily criminal, but still a conspiracy.
	But the fact that they won't talk to the Federalists or explain any of this stuff, there's an element of secrecy to this conspiracy as well.
	So, anyway, we talk to each other.
	We develop common strategies, and we're much more powerful and united as a team, she said.
	So the Federalist inquired about all six battleground states, but these efforts over the course of seven business days failed.
	We couldn't get these conspiring attorneys general to comment on what they want to do.
	It's a secret.
	The offices of Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin Secretaries of State have yet to provide a response to the coordinated effort.
	They did get a response from the office of Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, who says he does not have a similar relationship.
	After being pressed as to whether or not his response meant that Arizona is no longer a part of the conspiracy, I'm sorry, collaboration, right?
	He described the office, he says, well, you know, not beyond any kind of cordial collaborations at conferences and things like that.
	Are you spying on the American people?
	Well, no, Senator, not deliberately, says James Clapper.
	Sometimes you just accidentally listen to people's conversations and write them down and Put them in a database and all that kind of stuff.
	Nothing serious about any of that.
	But look, when we talk about election corruption, again, the Federalist is out there saying, look, they conspired together in 2020 to rig things.
	They did it again in 2022.
	They're getting ready to do it again in 2024.
	These battleground states, you got an admission from one of these state attorneys general that they were conspiring together.
	They don't want to talk about it.
	They're secretive about it. You got three or four of them won't respond at all.
	And That is not really where the big issue is.
	As I've said from the very beginning, all this corruption starts with ballot access.
	Let's take a look at RFK Jr., who's going to be announcing his vice presidential pick today and probably tanking his entire campaign by picking Google co-founder Sergey Brin's former wife.
	But I don't know what he thinks his demographics are going to be if he does something like that.
	I think he's better off than an action hero, you know, like the quarterback or the professional wrestler or something like that.
	But anyway, ballot access is the beginning of all these rigged elections.
	And that's no secret.
	That's out there. And it's completely ignored by the conservative press.
	It's completely ignored by MAGA. It's the type of thing that's weaponized against all the candidates, and since Ross Perot, they've weaponized to a much greater degree ballot access as well as debate access.
	I don't think we'll ever see another third-party candidate in a debate because of the Republicans and Democrats.
	They didn't want to have another Perot come up.
	And so he's going to unveil his running mate on Tuesday, but unfortunately for him, he needed to have that running mate in place Before he did the massive signature campaign in Nevada.
	He's only in Nevada and Utah had he gone through and gotten ballot access, from what I understand.
	The only one that he's got now is Utah.
	Because Nevada said, you have to have a running mate on there.
	Since you haven't even chosen a running mate, we're going to throw out all the signatures that you gathered.
	He got 15,000 signatures.
	That is incredibly expensive.
	35 years ago when we were doing it, it was costing us a dollar a signature as the Libertarian Party.
	It's way above that now, several dollars per signature.
	But he's going to need to have like $15 million.
	That's one of the reasons they're saying that he's picking this Google person to run with him.
	But, you know, it's, as CBS said, talking about this, they said it is one of the most difficult parts of the campaign, ballot access, for candidates that are not from a major party.
	Because the ballot access was set up to make sure that the Republicans and the Democrats would be the gatekeepers.
	That's why I totally despise these parties.
	Because they've set themselves up as gatekeepers of a duopoly.
	And now we have an election cycle which is the most corrupt I've ever seen.
	No debates by Biden or Trump with any of the people who would challenge him.
	Biden's not going to challenge RFK Jr.
	As a matter of fact, in Florida, the DNC made sure that nobody else was even on the ballot.
	Trump's not going to debate, didn't want to debate any of the other people who are running against him.
	You can't have elections based on issues.
	They don't even pretend to have it based on issues if they don't have any debates.
	That's where we are right now.
	So one guy in Texas changed his name, and he's running for president.
	He changed his name to, listen to this, literally Anybody Else.
	Literally Anybody Else.
	And in this article from The Hill, they refer to him as Else.
	Else. Mr.
	Else. A Texas man is hoping a legal name change and a long-shot presidential bid will get his argument across that some voters want literally anybody else.
	But former President Trump or Biden to serve another White House term.
	So this guy's a teacher, an Army veteran.
	He's from Texas.
	He legally changed his name.
	He showed them his driver's license.
	To prove that he had changed his name, he says, this isn't about me, literally anybody else.
	No, this is an idea.
	Out of 300 million people, we can do better for somebody running for president.
	And he also has the FEC commission records show that he has filed with the Federal Election Commission under the name, literally anybody else.
	He emphasized that he is not delusional.
	He understands garnering enough signatures to appear on the ballot will be very challenging.
	He said, this will be very hard to do.
	Oh, wait till you really find out.
	But it's not impossible.
	Yes, it is. This is the impossible mission force.
	Should you decide to accept this?
	We will disavow you and literally anyone else.
	My hope is to have Donald Trump, Joe Biden, and then literally anybody else right underneath them.
	I really want there to be an outlet for people like me who are just so fed up with this constant power grab between two parties that has no benefit for the common person.
	That's why you have to focus on local elections, folks.
	It's so tightly controlled.
	From the very beginning, the outcome is largely predetermined.
	Under Texas law, an application will be listed on the ballot as an independent.
	It needs to be submitted with a petition which requires 113,151 signatures from, and it gets even worse, not just from registered voters, but from registered voters who did not vote in the presidential primary of either party in Texas.
	I mean, it would be bad enough if he had to get 113,000 signatures, and then he doesn't realize that he's going to have to pay to have them verify.
	So you've got to pay somebody to get the signatures.
	He's not going to be able to get 113,000 signatures on his own.
	You're going to have to pay somebody to get the signatures.
	You're going to have to pay the state to validate them.
	And then they've got the additional detail.
	It's got to be somebody that didn't vote in either of these parties' primaries.
	Good luck with that.
	And I can imagine that that kind of verification is probably going to be more expensive in Texas than the kind of verification that we had to have as signatures.
	Is this a valid signature?
	Can I read it? Is there somebody with that name at this address?
	Because you had to put down, you had to sign your name, put your address there, and then print your name, address, and then sign your name.
	And so the signature had to be legible.
	A lot of people don't even have legible signatures.
	And then they had to be able to match that name with that address.
	Now in Texas, they've got to match it with somebody who didn't vote in either party's presidential primary.
	Understanding that this is a difficult task, no, it is impossible.
	He is asking Texas residents to list his name as a write-in candidate.
	Write-in candidates in the Long Star State are only required to register with the state.
	They do not have to have signature requirements.
	I looked up signature requirements for Tennessee.
	If you want to run as an independent, you only need 275 signatures.
	That's a lot different than 113,151 in Texas.
	Ha, ha, ha. And so, you know, if you want to get in, you do have to have signatures in Tennessee if you want to be a write-in candidate.
	You've got to have 50 signatures, and they've got to be in 50 days before the election, or they won't tabulate it if somebody writes it in.
	But you understand how this is rigged, and you understand why they focus you on those races where you have the least chance of getting anything done.
	Well, we had several people, and as I mentioned just before the last break, we had Marty, who gave us four coupons for this year, kind of rainy day coupons on a quarterly basis.
	Well, it's raining this month, so we're kind of...
	We're going to cash this in with Marty.
	Appreciate the support, Marty.
	It really is very supportive.
	Thank you. And so we have some people who have joined on with us on Rumble.
	B Slice, thank you very much.
	It says, thanks, David.
	On a side note, I'm reading TWA 800 by Jack Cashel.
	Never ceases to amaze me what they will do to cover up.
	Yeah, excellent book by him.
	I interviewed him, not on the TWA 800, we talked a little bit about that, but on his most recent book.
	But yeah, it truly is amazing, isn't it?
	I don't go to such steel evidence, threaten people, all the rest of this stuff.
	It's been around for a very long time.
	And of course, the Flight 800, the interesting context of that was just a couple of years before that, Exact same thing had happened in Iran, and they'd shot down an Iranian airliner.
	And there wasn't any way with an unfriendly nation that they were going to sweep that under the carpet.
	So they wound up paying people.
	Not much, but they wound up paying the families of the victims.
	But it was a naval exercise, and they had a missile go bad and shoot down an airliner, which is exactly what happened off of Long Island.
	Got lots of witnesses.
	Got documents about the air traffic control and all the rest of the stuff, which the FBI then went around and stole.
	So much evidence, and Jack Cashel did one of the best investigative compilations of that.
	On Rumble, Macker7, thank you very much for the tip.
	Much thanks and blessings to all.
	Well, thank you. And on Rockfin, Mark Crawford, thank you as well.
	Also on Rock Fan, a Syrian girl.
	Thank you. And she writes, Many thanks to you and your family for telling the truth in the face of all the lies.
	May God bless you for your integrity.
	Well, thank you. God has blessed us in so many days.
	More than I certainly don't deserve it.
	But God really has blessed us.
	And thank you for your blessing.
	On Rockfin. MJ Nichols.
	Thank you. It's great to hear you this morning, David.
	Thank you for the show. Well, thank you, MJ. Dustin Milton.
	Thank you for the tip. He says, thank you for all you do.
	David, you're one of a kind. Good, sir.
	We appreciate you. Well, thank you so much.
	I appreciate that. Rumble.
	Emulated void. Thank you.
	And he writes that as well, and so does It's Plissken.
	Thank you. Okay, we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	Hear news now at APSRadioNews.com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story.
	Just a small town boy drinking genetically more than fights away.
	This ensures he doesn't co-create.
	Stop the breathing!
	We're almost 9 billion people.
	Please stop the breathing right now.
	Those are great from SNCC Link.
	Let's talk a little bit about climate in the news.
	And of course we have...
	As always, the EPA, which was created to clean up toxic waste and things like that.
	There was a need for that to be cleaned up.
	It was not a federal function.
	There was no authority for them to do it.
	And to create this agency, which then went rogue as it metastasized like a cancer with its empire building and all the rest of this.
	As I've said many times, one of the guys that I knew, an organization I was doing some videos for, worked for them for 30 years, David Snare.
	And then he said he watched the mission change from cleaning up stuff to taking stuff away from us, which is what they're doing with all the missions regulation.
	They're trying to take away our cars, our stoves, our liberty, our mobility, all of this stuff.
	But the EPA itself has become a facilitator of environmental disasters.
	You know, when you look at what they've done to rivers out west.
	The fight to hide the damning information about fluoride, which we've all known, but even scientists within the EPA wanted to release that.
	And yet the trainee general in charge calls himself Rachel Levine.
	His real name is Richard.
	I call him Dick Devine. The guy was a child psychologist.
	Exactly what you would expect a child predator to hang out, right?
	I'm going to talk to kids about the sexual issues.
	I'm going to dress like a woman. Nothing to be suspicious about there.
	But anyway, this guy, Dick Devine, As did his best to politically shut down what the EPA scientists admitted was true.
	And so we have that trial that's going on right now.
	But San Francisco, with the blessings and even the help of the EPA, is now dumping raw sewage into San Francisco Bay at an alarming rate.
	Say environmentalists who are there looking at this stuff.
	And again, they don't care about this anymore.
	They're on an agenda to control our lives and to destroy our economy, destroy our freedom, our liberty, and our mobility.
	So they don't care about any of this stuff.
	Instead, they're going after beneficial and rare CO2. The CO2 is very rare.
	All of it combined is only 0.04%.
	And then you can take a very small percentage of that as man-made, and an even smaller percentage of that man-made stuff is made by internal combustion engines using their own figures.
	If you multiply those three together, you know, like 3% of the 0.4% I forget what the other percentage was.
	But you look at all that stuff and the bottom line is it comes out to 2.5, ten thousandths of a percent from vehicles.
	So we've got to ban the vehicles.
	Absolutely ludicrous what they're doing.
	But as they're focused on that, you have San Francisco Public Utilities Commission and the city are dumping raw sewage into San Francisco Bay.
	A local non-profit watchdog organization said its investigation found hundreds of federal Clean Water Act violations over the last five winters.
	EPA doesn't care about that.
	EPA is shutting down our cars, shutting down the power plants that are going to put electricity on the grid to run all those electric appliances that they're going to force us to have, the electric heaters and coolers and ovens and stoves, as well as our electric cars.
	They're going to shut that all down because they're shutting down the power plants.
	So, they said, there's no excuse for polluting the bay with sewage and trash, and those who pollute must be held accountable.
	Dumping millions of gallons of untreated sewage into Mission Creek and the bay is unacceptable, avoidable, and illegal.
	Nearly all of the San Francisco Public Utility Commission's discharges flow into Mission Creek, The non-profit's investigators visited Mission Creek during sewer discharges, and they saw the presence of fecal matter, plastic, syringes, and condoms in the water.
	Doesn't sound like they're doing a very good job of treating it or cleaning it or filtering it, does it?
	San Francisco is dumping raw sewage and trash directly into the bay at a magnitude that is almost incomprehensible.
	Take a look at what they've done, the local government has done, to the streets of San Francisco.
	Maybe they're just flushing that down, rinsing off the streets into the Bay.
	The single greatest source of pollution in the Bay and San Francisco is likely the greatest source of that sewage pollution.
	So he said the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission appears to be operating on the assumption that its sewage discharges receive treatment.
	And don't cause harm.
	A kind of a government variation of the, my excrement doesn't stink.
	That's what they're really telling everybody.
	The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission denied the accusations.
	They said their combined sewer stormwater system helps the environment.
	It's not a bug, it's a feature.
	Meanwhile, the EPA... I worked with the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission to develop this whole system.
	And maybe they can throw in some fluoride to boot with all this stuff.
	It's kind of like the way they put these rivers out west.
	As everybody is still trying to sell global warming, it's become such a joke, they don't call it global warming anymore.
	They still talk about, oh yeah, it's going to be warming and everything, but they call it climate change.
	I guess to try to distance themselves from so many of these false predictions.
	You know, RFK Jr.
	back in 2009 was saying his kids in New York would never see snow again.
	Maybe even in Washington, D.C. And that was in 2009.
	About a decade before that, it was being reported by the New York Times and others that there was a 97% consensus amongst the climate experts that there would soon be no snow.
	And then, of course, you know, so he does it like nine years later.
	Then four years after that, that was when he made his comments for RFK Jr.
	about the Cokes, the Koch brothers, you know, things go better with Cokes.
	No, he said they got much worse with the Cokes.
	He called them guilty of treason, said they deserved three hots and a cot.
	Went for months before anybody ever asked him the question.
	Of course, I tried to get him on.
	He agreed, but then backed off.
	But he came up with that.
	Oh, no, I was talking about a death penalty for the corporation.
	I wasn't talking about them.
	No, you were talking about them.
	You don't imprison a corporation.
	You don't give a corporation three hot meals a day or a bed in a jail cell.
	Anyway, so where are we now?
	As the snow disappeared, no, we had a lot of snow, a lot of different places this year, as a matter of fact.
	Tennessee had a lot of snow this year, and they have so much snow in Austria that they have had to cancel the final runs of the Alpine Ski World Cup Championship in Austria due to extreme amounts of snow.
	Unfortunately, due to the present weather condition, We've had to cancel these final runs, they said.
	Steve Malloy, who is an excellent researcher on all the climate stuff, tweeted that out.
	He says, Al Gore's effect strikes the World Cup skiing.
	He said, just yesterday, we were shown that, from the Washington Post, we were told that skiing was going to be threatened by a lack of snow.
	And this did not age very well.
	As a matter of fact, here is the article.
	Climate change threatens snow cover at ski destinations worldwide.
	That was the 23rd of March this year, right?
	Just a couple of days ago.
	We're at the 26th now, so that was this weekend.
	Now, Saturday.
	Then on Sunday, they had to cancel the final runs of the alpine skiing event because there was too much snow.
	So it's going to threaten skiing, is it?
	In this age of global boiling, isn't snow supposed to be a thing of the past?
	They all told the experts, RFK Jr., the Washington Post, they all said.
	Well, it's not. The first event of the Alpine ski season had to be canceled because of too much snow.
	Heavy snow forced the cancellation of a women's event at San Maritz in December.
	Also canceled due to snow and wind was an event scheduled to be run on the Matterhorn in November.
	Heavy snow forced cancellation of a Women's World Cup event in Italy in February.
	The New American says it's just a little confusing because the climate experts at The Guardian assured us earlier this month, I mean, we're not talking about failed predictions from 25 years ago.
	Well, they're still making these false predictions.
	They never learn.
	They're just like Julie Green or Michael Flynn.
	It's just amazing.
	The Guardian assured us earlier this month that the, quote, Well, I think this guy has had his Waterloo in terms of a big dose of reality, has he?
	Climate change, he says, is an evolving business reality for the ski industry and the tourism sector.
	I think he got that a little bit wrong.
	I think what he meant to say is climate change is an evolving business.
	They just keep evolving it and the lies to support it.
	It's kind of like the joke my pastor told.
	He said he had a guy who was a new convert.
	He was a thief. And he said, you know, Pastor, I think there's a missing comma here in the Bible.
	It says, you know, people read this as, let him who stole steel no more work with his hands.
	And he says, no, I think there needs to be a comma there.
	He said, let him who stole steel no more work with his hands.
	Yeah. These guys, they have an evolving climate business.
	And, you know, if that lie didn't work, we just repeat it.
	We don't have to rinse and repeat.
	We just repeat.
	According to this so-called scientist, you know, that's the thing.
	A scientist should have a model that's going to predict something.
	It should be verifiable.
	And when you verify that it doesn't work, they need to shut up and go back to the drawing board.
	Maybe take down that sign that says that they're a scientist.
	But it is, after all, an evolving business, isn't it?
	According to Scott, skiers should expect much shorter seasons going forward because of climate change's effects.
	I guess shorter seasons because there's so much snow you can't have your final runs.
	Keeping skiing alive at all depends upon how closely mankind is able to keep emissions at the levels agreed upon in Paris in 2015.
	As I said, we'll always have Paris, sweetheart, right?
	Because Trump kept it.
	He didn't want to get rid of it.
	He kept it throughout his entire four years.
	It was self-ratified, you know, by Kerry and Obama, and Trump left it alone.
	Kept it in place.
	How much shorter depends on the ability of all countries to deliver on their Paris Climate Agreement emission reduction.
	So there you go. If we don't deliver on this stuff, then we are always, we're going to not have any more scheme.
	In a study published on Taylor& Francis Online, Scott and another so-called scientist, Predicted that ski seasons in the US in coming decades will be 14 to 33 days shorter on the low end and 27 to 62 days shorter on the high end.
	Just think about the absurdity of this.
	You know, we frequently will look at the weather, you know, weather predictions, weather predicting, and they can't even be consistent between the app that Karen uses and the one that I use.
	When we look at where the temperature is, where we live, they have the thermometer in slightly different places in the same small town, and they can't get a consistent reading.
	And it'll be more than their one and a half degrees centigrade difference, just with that.
	And what are they comparing this to?
	They're comparing this to records that didn't exist for the most part a century ago.
	And if they did exist, how different were the towns then than they are now?
	In most cases, the towns have become urban heat islands, or they've moved the thermometers to airport tarmacs, or they're looking at a digital readout of a thermometer that's now on an airport tarmac.
	When in the past...
	They would look at a mercury thermometer.
	And you're going to tell me that they got these mercury thermometers so accurate that one degree difference is going to be the end of the world?
	But how absurd it is when these people have so much trouble predicting what the weather is going to be.
	To say that in coming decades, it's going to be between 14 to 33 days shorter, or 27 to 62 days shorter in terms of a ski season.
	What a total amount of nonsense.
	What is Christmas with no snow?
	No white Christmas with no snow.
	Yeah, so that's the fear they're putting in everybody, right?
	If we have no snow, there's not going to be anything at the ski resort in Vermont where we're all headed, right?
	Yeah. This is a story that has been around for quite some time.
	They just didn't make it about global warming, and they didn't try to take everybody's Studebakers when Irving Berlin wrote White Christmas in 1955.
	Oh, yeah, we're just having a warm season up here.
	Oh, could ruin me at this hotel resort.
	Everybody's coming up here for skiing, and we haven't had any snow for quite a while.
	Oh, it must be your Studebaker.
	Gonna have to get rid of that.
	Maybe it's the meat that you're eating.
	Are you cooking on a gas stove, General?
	It's so ridiculous.
	We've always had fluctuations in the weather, but now we've got to be concerned.
	And now, notice how the narrative with the Washington Post and Congress and everything, now they're so focused again on skiing.
	As a matter of fact, Senator Kennedy from Louisiana, a Republican who loves to Focus on the lunacy of these judicial picks who don't know basic points of law.
	You know, they're DEI picks by Biden.
	He loves to expose them as frauds.
	And so they had some climate hearings.
	And they brought in an expert witness who's kind of this surfer dude who does snowboarding as an expert witness on climate change.
	Listen to this exchange.
	It's classic. What is carbon dioxide?
	I don't know. I went to high school, but carbon dioxide is a gas.
	Okay. I'm not a professional to talk about carbon dioxide so much.
	Well, you want us to abolish it, right?
	No. There's always going to be carbon dioxide.
	Right. So what is it you want us to do?
	I... Let me back up, because I want to...
	I mean, you're here as an expert.
	Tell me more about what carbon dioxide is.
	I'm here as an expert cross-country skier who sees the changes in my winters and the landscape that I live in in Alaska.
	And so carbon dioxide is what I see it as.
	He's been through a lot of winters, evidently, at his advanced age.
	Is it the major part of our atmosphere?
	It's a huge part of our atmosphere, yes.
	It's actually a very small part of our atmosphere.
	0.04 percent.
	Well, okay. Whatever.
	Yeah, I don't know. What are you asking specifically?
	Well, you said we need to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
	I'd like to know first if you know what it is.
	You want us to abolish fossil fuels?
	I never said that.
	You never have said that? No.
	Okay. What do you think we ought to do with fossil fuels?
	What will we do with fossil fuels?
	Yeah. Should we make any changes?
	I would like to see a decrease in the use of fossil fuels.
	Why? I think there's a possibility to use more electric generation.
	Okay. Over what period?
	More electric generation. You hear that?
	50 years, 100 years.
	That's not... I would like to see it come as fast as possible while continuing...
	How fast? Sorry?
	How fast? I'm not...
	I don't have a good answer for that.
	You don't know? No. Okay. You just think we ought to...
	How much will it cost for us to become carbon neutral in the United States by 2050?
	I'm not a professional on that.
	I don't have any idea. You don't have any idea?
	No. You just think we ought to spend the money?
	I'm not an economist. Yeah, but it's going to cost money.
	You realize that? Yeah, but we've also talked about the trade-off of what the cost of climate change as emergencies will cost in the future also.
	Right, but it's going to cost carbon neutral by 2050, right?
	I do not know. You don't know.
	You just think we ought to do it.
	I don't have a great answer for you, but I think… If we spent those trillions of dollars and became carbon neutral by 2050 in the United States, which you advocate, how much will it reduce world temperatures?
	I don't have an answer for that.
	You don't know? No. You just think we ought to spend the money and then see what happens?
	I think, as an athlete, I think if we spend that money and invest in our future, hopefully those temperatures stop rising and maybe the snow at least stabilizes where it is for me.
	But, yeah. It's going to disappear if we don't.
	It's on the trillions. I don't know, anyway.
	I don't know. When my colleagues invite witnesses to come to us to tell us, advise us on passing legislation, always check out the background of our witnesses.
	Because I'd like to know who I'm talking to.
	I checked yours out, Mr.
	Schumacher, and I want to be sure I understand it as I evaluate your testimony.
	I bet he was excited when he saw his resume.
	June 8, 2020, you tweeted, I'm going to quote, the war on drugs was intentionally created to incarcerate black people en masse, end quote.
	The war on drugs, you said, was intentionally created to incarcerate black people en masse.
	Who intentionally created the war on drugs to put black people in jail?
	Who were you talking about? I don't remember typing that.
	You don't? No. It's on your Twitter feed.
	Maybe a retweet. I don't know.
	I haven't used that in a while.
	Well, even if it's a retweet, it shows your support.
	Well, he can be right about something, Kenny.
	CIA, Senator Kennedy, they're the ones who created the war on drugs.
	They're the ones who created crack cocaine as well.
	But when we talk about the environment, you notice that he said, well, I'd like to see us move to more electric generation.
	That's one of the things when David Sneer would go around and talk to people, he'd say, so he'd ask the crowd.
	He'd say, what would you like to see us use?
	What's your favorite source of energy generation?
	What is the one?
	And he said it always.
	You would have somebody who'd say, well, I think we should use electricity.
	And he says, you understand electricity is what we're generating.
	It's not the thing that generates electricity.
	It's the outcome of it.
	This guy doesn't even know what is the input and what is the output.
	And an energy generation system.
	He really didn't know anything.
	And I imagine that when he had his researchers look at that, Senator Kennedy's mouth started watering.
	I thought, we're going to have a good time with this one.
	We also have some other expert scientists who say that there is no human era in Earth's geological history, they said.
	And again, this is kind of reflecting, you know, when we talk about quote-unquote science, and these people are not doing science, folks.
	This is the same thing that we've seen with Fauci and the rest of these people.
	It's arguments from authority.
	It's the antithesis of the scientific method.
	It's what Francis Bacon opposed.
	He said, we have people in authority.
	He called it academia, you know, that are coming out with these pronouncements.
	Do what I say because I've got this position at this prestigious university.
	I don't have to prove any of it.
	Just take my word for it.
	I am science, as Fauci would imply.
	That is not science.
	And you have to understand there's a lot of pagan religion that is wrapped up in a lot of these things as well.
	Gaia, the Gaia theory that was put out there by Lovelock.
	And the idea that humans are a virus, that the earth is some sentient being that evolved and we're here to kill it.
	So we have to be eliminated.
	And so they really don't like humans.
	There's a very satanic angle to all this stuff.
	To eradicate humanity.
	To depopulate the earth.
	And after 15 years of deliberation, a team of scientists, it took them 15 years, they milked this thing for half a career, really.
	15 years of deliberation, a team of scientists made the case that humankind has so fundamentally altered the natural world that a new phase of earth's existence, a new epoch, has already begun.
	Soaring greenhouse gases, the spread of microplastics, decimation of species, fallout from nuclear tests, all the rest of the stuff.
	And you know, that 2.5 ten thousandths of a percent carbon dioxide that we put out there, all that stuff is just destroying the planet.
	The decision to reject this proposal for an Anthropocene epoch as a formal unit of geologic time scale is now approved.
	So they rejected it after 15 years.
	These people built a career off of this.
	And another group of bureaucrats and experts, the International Union of Geological Sciences, shot them down.
	A decisive rejection of the Anthropocene proposal, if I'm pronouncing that correctly, but it's basically like anthropology, you know, the epic of man, that's what they're saying, has been rejected by the field's preeminent experts.
	There were four votes in favor and 12 against.
	See, democracy has nothing to do with science.
	It really doesn't. One person can be right against the rest of the world.
	It really doesn't have anything to do.
	A vote in some prestigious institution doesn't make any difference to that whatsoever.
	In 2009, scientists began an inquiry that ultimately concluded The Holocene epoch, which began 11,700 years ago as the last ice age, ended and gave way to the Anthropocene about 1950.
	Well, I don't know. The way I look at it, it's a lot simpler.
	You know, I look at...
	Creation was Earth 1.0, and then after the fall we had Earth 2.0, then after the flood we had Earth 3.0, and then I guess...
	With Babel we had 3.5, so it's a lot simpler when you just listen to the person who did it, who was there.
	The river is essentially dead.
	It's not just the San Francisco Bay where they are dumping raw sewage in it.
	They also have a well-funded environmental group up in the Pacific Northwest is looking at the Klamath River.
	And the premature deaths of thousands of salmon.
	So this is another product of the EPA. Another one out west.
	They want to kill transportation.
	They want to kill power generation.
	And now they're killing lots of fish as well.
	American River is an organization that's received millions of dollars from left-of-center environmentalist grant-making organizations in recent years, was the orchestrator of the Klamath Dam's Removal Project.
	The drawdowns of several reservoirs pursuant to the scheduled removal of four dams in the river preceded the deaths of hundreds of thousands of young salmon in the waterway, according to the Oregon Public Broadcasting.
	So, they think the dams are in the way in keeping the salmon from breeding properly, so let's destroy them.
	But in the process of destroying the dams, they killed all the salmon, I guess.
	I guess it was a damn mistake.
	The push to remove the dams is often marketed as beneficial for salmon.
	As proponents of the plan, including American rivers, have argued that the dams obstruct the natural movement of the salmon as well as their access to habitat.
	However, weeks after beginning the process to remove one of the systems scheduled for deconstruction on the river, a large number of 830,000 young salmon released into the river died between February the 26th and March the 2nd.
	So that's about four or five days.
	According to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, those officials there attributed the mass death to gas bubble disease, which is caused by changes in water pressure, stated that the changes in pressure driving the deaths was attributable to old dam infrastructure and is slated for removal.
	The agency further stated that the water turbidity and the dissolved oxygen levels do not appear to have contributed to the mass death.
	Well, this is similar to the same type of stuff that we've seen with windmills.
	They're verifiably killing large numbers of birds and especially bats.
	They fly, and again, it's a pressure differential like that.
	The bats are breathing very, very rapidly.
	They fly into, they don't hit the blades.
	They thought maybe they were hitting the blades, but no, it's blowing up their lungs because of an air pressure differential.
	Sometimes the birds will hit the blades, but not the bats.
	But the birds are dying this way as well with the lungs blowing up.
	So they go in and they're breathing very rapidly.
	They take a breath. They go in very quickly into an area of very low pressure and it explodes their lungs.
	It's called air embolism when you do it as a scuba diver.
	And then, of course, there's what's happening to the whales, and then a lot of people are having a lot of problems with the effects of the windmills as well.
	Pressure differentials and other things like that, but, you know, we don't care about people, do we?
	Jackie writes and says, sent me this article here about battery-powered ambulances.
	Looks like a great idea, does it, out of the UK? The UK is rushing towards a 2040 net zero target We're good to go.
	While women in the later stages of labor usually have to wait over two hours for an ambulance in the UK. Part of the problem is a lack of ambulances.
	So the NHS there decided to update its ambulance fleet, but to do it with electric vehicles.
	First problem is the cost.
	Second problem, of course, is the range.
	And the third problem is the slow charging times or the inability to get them charged.
	The new EVs acquired by the NHS officially have a range of 124 miles between charges.
	And that's significantly below the 160 miles recommended during the trial phase.
	However, when they actually did the trials, they found that it wasn't 160, it wasn't 124.
	It was actual range was near to 70 miles.
	70 mile range.
	Would they even be able to get some, go out, pick up somebody and get them back to a hospital without dying?
	Would that happen? And of course, the 124 miles that they had there have been listed based on optimal conditions, such as flat terrain, no hills, no use of air conditioning, And very mild weather.
	Because if it gets too hot or too cold, you reduce the battery life.
	Charging takes only 90 minutes.
	But again, during the trial phase, things worked out very differently.
	It often took up to four hours.
	Not one and a half hours, but four hours.
	The ambulances were also expensive.
	Each one of them cost $190,000.
	Part of the reason they're so expensive is they have to be specially converted.
	The NHS uses Ford Transit vehicles converted by a German company, as well as Mercedes-Benz Sprinters.
	So they have to go through and make this custom conversion.
	To illustrate the extent of ethical question, they said in 2022, over 500 seriously ill people died while waiting for an ambulance.
	So you can expect to see this go up by many, many multiples when they slow everything down, when you've got dead EVs, when you've got EVs that only have a 70-mile range, and maybe they can't get out and get the person and get them back without having the thing die.
	Maybe they could transfer the patients like some kind of Pony Express or something, you know?
	They get to a point where it dies and they call it in.
	They send out another ambulance and they ferry the people on the rest of the way.
	Or maybe we could just start calling these deaths because of EV ambulances.
	Maybe we could call it the MacGuffin murders.
	That's got a nice ring to it.
	Because they've got to have that MacGuffin.
	Got to have that control over us.
	And it's worth it, isn't it?
	To kill a few people in order to get that kind of control.
	That's what we've seen throughout the pandemic.
	Ohio's Bernie Marino, who just won a primary, says the manic move to electric vehicles will destroy the U.S. auto industry.
	And we see this a lot. And, of course, that is true and it is important.
	But that is not the biggest deal, folks.
	You know, I'd like to see the automobile industry prosper because it's domestic jobs and all.
	But what they're doing is taking away all private vehicles.
	They don't want you to be able to have a vehicle, whether it's made domestically or foreign-made.
	They don't want you to have your own private vehicle, whether it's internal combustion engine or whether it's EV. They don't want you moving.
	They want complete control over you.
	That was their one big problem that they had with the lockdown.
	And so they want to get rid of that.
	But this is something that's being used for political purposes, and so you have the political candidates.
	Trump is talking about it.
	Marino is talking about it.
	Other people are talking about how Biden has just plummeted in the polls in Michigan because of the automobile industry, they think.
	But what about the EPA destroying private cars?
	Do Republicans want to talk about that?
	No, they don't. They don't want to take on the EPA. They're not going to do anything to block this at the federal level.
	And it doesn't matter who gets elected president.
	It doesn't matter who gets elected senator.
	They're not going to get to the source of the problem, which is an abusive, tyrannical, globalist bureaucracy.
	They aren't, again, they're shutting down now power generation.
	If people buy an electric vehicle, they're going to see that the government is going to force them to leave it there as a battery and not to drive it.
	Sorry, we don't have enough power capacity for you to drive your electric vehicle.
	Leave it plugged in. We're going to use it as a battery.
	So you spend all this money.
	And it's going to be blocked from moving and not have any power where it can move, and they'll use it as their own personal battery.
	Emissions are not a material risk to investors or to companies, but the SEC's climate disclosure rule is, says Real Clear Wire.
	Straying from their core mission of protecting investors, the Securities and Exchange Commission is now telling corporations that they have to disclose climate issues as part of their public disclosures.
	And they just approved this in a partisan 3-2 vote.
	What is going on with this?
	Well, this is, again, Biden's bureaucracy stepping in and trying to salvage ESG at the same time that you see people starting to move back against this.
	In Texas, for example, they just divested $8.5 billion, with a B, from a BlackRock fund because they said BlackRock is focused on...
	Shutting down the very industry where we got the $8.5 billion worth of taxes.
	And so we're going to pull this money out from them.
	And you've got a lot of state attorneys general across the country That are part of a lawsuit against these companies that are pushing out ESG because they said it's fraudulent.
	People invest in the stock market.
	They invest in these companies because of financial performance, pure and simple.
	And yet what you're doing with ESG, you're saying the financial performance doesn't matter anymore.
	It's not a part of your goal.
	Your goal is to do what the government wants when it comes to energy and when it comes to social issues.
	That's what ESG is about.
	And so what you're doing is you're committing fraud.
	And so as BlackRock and these other people are starting to pull back from this because of these actions by the state attorneys general, you've got the Biden administration comes in and now uses the Securities and Exchange Commission to tell them, you're going to have to do a climate analysis.
	And you're going to have to publish this.
	Well, that is an opportunity to shut down any of their enemies.
	It's even worse than the climate stuff, because now you've got to go through and you've got to come up with a study and determine how many angels there are on the head of a pen.
	Because all this climate science is nonsense.
	It's not science.
	It's non-science.
	As a matter of fact, it's nonsense.
	And so you have to come up with a statement.
	You're going to make that statement, and then the SEC is going to hold you accountable for the accuracy of that statement.
	Who knows what is going on with any of this climate?
	So certainly the climate experts don't know.
	How can any company talk about what their climate requirements are?
	So this is, first of all, means by the Biden administration to prop up The failing ESG, which is now despised and under attack.
	And then secondly, to have a weapon to use against any political enemy.
	And that's going to be your climate statement.
	Investors don't care about this, but the Biden administration does.
	And so that's the real issue behind all of this.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	But before we go to break, I want to thank some of the people who have tipped us on Rumble and Rockfin.
	Again, we're at the end of the month, and we've had Marty, who has done matching funds in the past, very kindly sent us some coupons that we could use one per quarter.
	For matching donations.
	And so we're going to use this coupon today because we're getting close to the end of the month and things are a bit low here.
	And so I want to thank all the people who have tipped on Rumble.
	We have YJ72. Thank you.
	He says, please have a cup of coffee on me.
	Enjoy listening to you every morning.
	Well, thank you. B. Turner, 170.
	Thank you very much for that.
	Junk Silver, thank you.
	He says, Donald Trump Jr.
	just interrupted your show on Rumble to remind me that even a $5 donation would help.
	Who am I to argue with him?
	So, there we go. Yeah, we're getting, Rumble is putting out Trump and Trump Jr.
	asking for $5 donations.
	Yeah. They got a lot more money than we do, so I really do appreciate it.
	Actually, it helps us a lot more.
	It goes a lot further with us than it does with them.
	Shea Bishop on Rockfin, thank you very much for the tip.
	Says, thank you, David. Hope you have a good Easter.
	Well, thank you very much. As a matter of fact, I mentioned that I needed to take some time off for some medical tests on Thursday.
	And since Friday was Good Friday, I asked Gard, and he's loaded and ready to go with some good shows on Thursday and Friday.
	So Gard Goldsmith is going to be filling in for us on Thursday and Friday.
	I know it's going to be a great show.
	Always is when Gard fills in.
	On Rumble, Radice Bro, thank you for the tip.
	He said, the bridge will never get fixed.
	Compare the time it took to build the Empire State Building versus the freeways that they try and build today with better equipment.
	That's absolutely right. Yeah.
	Texas is one of the worst places.
	Actually, around here in Tennessee, they've done some major repaving in no time at all.
	Never saw that happen. Texas is one of the worst places I've ever lived in in terms of dragging out construction projects and also the projects that they want to build.
	They don't want to build anything anymore except a toll road, and they take 10 years to do it or more.
	And they don't add any lanes.
	What they do is you have no additional capacity.
	Instead, if you want to go along feeder roads, they put in additional traffic lights.
	To, you know, kind of nudge you onto the freeway.
	Or maybe the word is coerce, I think.
	So, pull that up again, Travis.
	We lost the stuff there.
	Thank you. Opossum King.
	Thank you for the tip. Says, black swans will fill the air.
	That's right. Sprumford.
	Thank you very much. I appreciate that.
	That's very generous on Rumble. I love what you said earlier about fear.
	Fear inhibits rational thinking, and it's a devastatingly effective tool that our enemies use against us.
	It's imperative that we resist it.
	God bless, David. Thank you.
	I appreciate that. Yes, and God is the way that we fight against that fear, right?
	How many times, it's not just when somebody encounters an angel, but how many times does God tell us to fear not?
	And he gives us some great reasons not to be in fear.
	We'll be right back.
	If you like the Eagles, the cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com.
	♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
	🎵
	Thank you. You're listening to The
	David Knight Show.
	Well, we have a listener who has sent this in saying that Canada seems to be censoring Bible verses on social media.
	Now, these are not Bible verses that would pick out a particular sin and condemn somebody for it.
	Now, these were actually Bible verses that were...
	You know, about sheep and a shepherd and that type of thing.
	It truly is amazing what they will take exception to.
	And so this is what he sent me.
	These are some screenshots. This is off of Facebook.
	And so his son sent this to him.
	He said, what was up with the original one?
	Was a quote from the Bible in John.
	It says, My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me, and I give to them eternal life, and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.
	And so it was done as a meme.
	You got a picture of some sheep.
	That must be very threatening to somebody.
	I don't know. And that Bible verse.
	Now, what is hateful or threatening about that?
	I don't know. But what was happening to, he said, my son in Canada sent me these screenshots from his Facebook.
	So he said, when you look at it, first it came up and said, I'm sorry, this is harmful content or something like that.
	We've censored it. He said, then once I clicked on show me the graphic content, that's what it said, graphic content.
	I mean, this is a picture of sheep.
	I wonder what it thought.
	Is this chat GPT doing this?
	What is the deal?
	But what is it that it took exception to?
	Really, I mean, words or pictures.
	There's nothing in words or pictures that would be threatening by that.
	So then once I clicked on the show me the graphic content, it unblocked the picture and the verse.
	And that was what the person had posted.
	And so he says, you know, and he took a screenshot of what it showed before, and it says, this photo may contain violent or graphic content.
	And it was blacked out, and he had to click on it.
	So at first it blurred the picture, put a warning up, saying there was graphic or violent content, and it was blocked.
	And there's a close-up of that.
	And so he says, Canada is making Facebook cover-up all Bible verses with a disclaimer so as not to offend Muslims now.
	I think that is probably the best example, probably the best explanation of that, because we're in the middle of Ramadan, and there's nothing in the text of what he put up.
	There's nothing in the picture, a picture of sheep.
	Instead, it's able to discern that he's quoting the Bible.
	And so if he's quoting the Bible, it's probably something, there's a chance, I should say.
	Facebook has decided that if somebody's quoting the Bible, there's a chance that there might be something in there that would offend a Muslim.
	So we have to censor that.
	He said, so a friend of the U.S. posted the verse and asked us, anybody in Canada, let us know how this verse showed up on their feed.
	And this is how I saw it.
	Isn't that amazing? Yeah, that's where we are right now.
	If you don't realize just how bad this is going to get, they are working on weaponized censorship like we've never seen before.
	This kind of censorship. Just think back a couple of years ago.
	You know, it was only, what, six years ago that I got pulled off of all social media and everything along with the other people at Infowars.
	That was when they overtly did it.
	They'd been doing shadow banning and things like that.
	And I got content taken down going back to 2013 for talking about the Federal Reserve and how it was created and similar to...
	The way, you know, J.P. Morgan was similar to the way the banker in It's a Wonderful Life was.
	I called it It's a Wonderful Lie.
	Did it at Christmas time because that's when they created it.
	And so it was the 100th anniversary in 2013.
	They took that down. So we'd been seeing some censorship that was individualized like that and kind of raised your eyebrows about it.
	But then they just said, well, you know, then they went to shadow banning of individuals and just overt banning of individuals.
	But they're coming after banning our religious speech, all the rest of the stuff, because...
	If you look at the internet, and if you look at geospatial intelligence, they've been mapping out people's political and religious beliefs since the 1990s.
	That's what they've been focused on.
	This is just going to be the implementation of it.
	But this implementation stage, where they start to bring in artificial intelligence as the automated snitches and Stasi police, that is really going to escalate in the next couple of years.
	It is going to be beyond anything we have seen up to this point.
	And we look at how technology is affecting our children.
	This is a story not from a conservative organization.
	This is from Politico.
	Politico saying it's causing them to drop out of life.
	How phones have warped Generation Z, the generation of zombies.
	These are people who now are 11 to 26 years old.
	Z as in zombie, they said it's hard to believe sometimes that smartphones and social media haven't been around forever.
	And we get accustomed to these things.
	You know, it does seem like they've been around forever.
	And it's starting to seem like the censorship has been around forever.
	They're doing it gradually. Doing it from the inside, doing it with disruption, doing it iteratively as Fauci bragged they were going to do with the pandemic and other things.
	But that's what they do with all of this stuff.
	They do it iteratively, gradually.
	And so we start to get accustomed to the censorship.
	And then as soon as we do, they add the next thing.
	Well, they said, even though it seems like smartphones and social media and things like that have been around forever, for the Generation Z people, ages 11 to 26, it has been around their entire life.
	And this cohort also happens to be the generation with the worst mental health in history.
	Is that a coincidence?
	Asks Politico.
	Well, no, it's not. And I would also say this.
	Every time we talk about generation this or generation that, they use the same terms as Strauss and Howe, who in the early 1990s said we have every four generations, we have about every 80 years, we have a massive disruption of society, always accompanied by economic major disruptions and catastrophes, and usually accompanied by war.
	They call that the fourth turning.
	They do not want you to realize that when the midst of all of our institutions being wiped out and reorganized, along with a massive financial crisis, probably accompanied by war, they don't want you to understand the season that we're in.
	They'll talk endlessly about Gen Z, Gen X, the...
	Millennials and all the rest of this stuff.
	All these terms that Strauss and Howe used, and they did it in the early 90s, said sometime in the mid-2000s, we're going to have a global financial crisis that's going to kick off the fourth turning.
	It'll end probably about 2029.
	So a social psychologist, Jonathan Haidt, I guess he pronounced his name, H-A-I-D-T, wrote a book, The Anxious Generation, How the Great Rewiring of Childhood is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness.
	He's launching a shot at what he hopes will become a full-scale war against social media and smartphone use by kids and by teens.
	And again, I think we ought to understand how bad it is, how it has been deliberately weaponized.
	In the case of TikTok, I do not support a government ban of TikTok.
	I support a parental ban of TikTok and things like that.
	It's very important. But remember, Steve Jobs said, I don't let my kids play with smartphones or iPads or anything like that.
	The guy who developed this stuff, he knew.
	These people know exactly what they're doing.
	So the author says our children are on a conveyor belt, and a lot of them are getting shredded.
	He says, without action from parents, lawmakers, schools, and tech companies, the youth mental health crisis will continue unabated, he warns.
	There could be some unexpected political fallout as well.
	As he puts it, with a growing sense of anxiety and dislocation, people may become more open to an authoritarian leader who promises to stop the chaos.
	Yeah. That is the point.
	They want chaos. They want decline.
	They want conflict of different people groups.
	That's precisely what they want.
	So he said he and a co-author have been collecting...
	All the studies we can find at Google Doc.
	And we have a review called Social Media Mental Health, a collaborative review.
	What we have is 34 studies that suggest a causal effect And there are 21 studies that show no effect.
	But here's the thing. The studies that show no effect take measurements a day or a week apart.
	When we look at longitudinal studies that run for a month or more, the great majority of them find a great effect.
	And that's just one body of empirical research.
	The more important body of empirical research are the true experiments, randomized control trials.
	We have 16 just in our review, though there are other newer ones that found an effect.
	He said only six did not find an effect.
	Now, hopefully they'll pay attention to this.
	You know, they just blow off anything like this, the equivalent of this, when we're looking at the effects of the vaccines, but...
	He says, how and why did we as a society let this problem get so out of hand?
	Was it an accident, or did they know what they were doing?
	He said, my argument is that between 2010 and 2015, adolescent life was rewired.
	He said, if you think about it, in 2010, almost everyone had a flip phone.
	They had no Instagram account because it was just invented that year.
	They had no high-speed data.
	They had no high-speed internet.
	They had to pay for internet usage.
	They had to pay for each and every text.
	So a 13 or 14-year-old kid in the year 2010 was not online all day.
	But over the next few years, Instagram became very popular.
	The front-facing camera comes out on iPhones in 2010.
	So now photographs are much more of yourself.
	Most people get high-speed internet.
	Most people get an unlimited data plan.
	And video games get much more immersive with multiplayer online games that thrive on high-speed internet.
	Now imagine in just a couple of years when they've rolled out 5G. Imagine just a couple of years when they've rolled out advances in virtual reality, VR, and augmented reality, AR. Imagine what that's going to do to the kids.
	It's going to get a lot worse if we don't get on top of this.
	Seriously. And it's not just for the kids.
	It's for the adults as well.
	You need to watch out and make sure that you don't waste your life just entertaining yourself to death.
	That you don't just kick back and do nothing.
	And there's even going to be another aspect of this, and that is, I think, a kind of artificial intelligence nihilism.
	Well, I guess there's no point in me learning how to code anymore because ChatGPT is going to code.
	And I guess there's no point in me learning how to paint or to draw or to do music or to design circuits or anything like that.
	ChatGPT will do it. By the time I learn how to do it, it'll do it.
	Well, you know, there's a certain joy in the process, number one.
	Number two, there's liberty and there's independence in the process.
	You don't want to become dependent on these machines, even if they do a better job.
	The Amish have looked at this and said, well, you know, hey, these people could have bought a much better produced wagon than the one that they build themselves.
	But instead they focus on learning the skills to build it themselves, why?
	So that they can be independent.
	And we have to get over this idea of having something that is, you know, just kind of comes out of this unboxing mentality.
	Oh, look at this! It's in a box, and we pull this out, and it's all perfectly assembled and joined, and there's no gaps in anything, and it's just, it's like it's just spontaneously created, and it's so interesting, isn't it, to look at these unboxed videos for some people?
	And this...
	Kindless, immaculate creation of this thing versus something that you've hobbled together.
	You know it's got a couple of flaws here and there, but you built that.
	And you ought to take pride in the fact that you built it, and you did it on your own, and you could do another one on your own, and you don't have to depend on some giant corporation or some robot or artificial intelligence to do it for you.
	It's very important that we not get sucked into that trap.
	On Rumble, ON61, thank you very much for the tip.
	He says, if we're doubling down, let's go.
	Thank you, Marty. Thank you, David.
	We'll definitely be checking in with Guard.
	Well, thank you very much. Guard will be doing the show on Thursday and Friday.
	And again, thank you to Marty for doing the matching of tips today.
	So thank you very much. Anything people put in?
	We'll be doubled. On Rumble, Aksab, thank you for the tip, says, can't live without the best news aggregator.
	Well, thank you very much. I appreciate that.
	Look at this story, too.
	At the same time, we're looking at what happened with our phones, how, you know, faster data, more cameras and things like that, how that has affected especially young children.
	Look at Bhutan. In 1999, they had almost no crime.
	And television had been banned there.
	Television had been around for, you know, 50 years or whatever, everywhere else, but they had banned it up until 1999.
	Then they lifted the ban on television and boom, immediately society started going down the tubes.
	Very interesting. This was put out as a tweet by Rob Henderson.
	And he said, And he goes back to a 20-year-old article from The Guardian.
	April 2002 was a turbulent month for the people of Bhutan.
	One of the remotest nations in the world, perched high in the snow lines of the Himalayas, suffered a crime rave.
	The 700,000 inhabitants of a kingdom that calls itself the Land of the Thunder Dragon had never experienced serious law-breaking before.
	Yet now there are reports from many towns and villages of fraud, of violence, and of even murder.
	The Bhutanese had always been proud of their incorruptible officials.
	But then they had a 42-year-old chief accountant of the state trading corporation charged with embezzling 70,000 pounds, English pounds.
	Every aspect of Bhutanese life is steeped in Himalayan Buddhism.
	Yet on April the 13th, the Royal Bhutan police began searching the provincial town of Mangar for thieves who had vandalized and robbed three of the country's most ancient stupas.
	I think these are temples. Three days later, in their capital, where overindulgence in rice wine had been the only social vice before that, a 37-year-old truck driver bludgeoned his wife to death after she discovered he was addicted to heroin.
	In Bhutan, family welfare has always come first.
	But then Sanam, a 42-year-old farmer, drove his terrified in-laws off a cliff, In a drunken rage, killing his niece and injuring his sister.
	Why was this kingdom, with its head in the clouds, falling victim to a kind of crime associated with urban life in America and Europe?
	For the Bhutanese, the only explanation seemed to be five large satellite dishes planted in a vegetable patch, ringed by sugar-pink cosmos flowers on the outskirts of Thimpu.
	So, when we bring Hollywood into our homes, we stop and think about what you're bringing into your home when you turn on the television set.
	It always struck me, you know, in the early days of TV, sitting there as a child looking at black and white TV, Red Skelton, remember him?
	If you're my age or older.
	And he was always this shy, self-deprecating comedian, clown.
	And he would always, at the end of the program, Talked directly into the camera with his hat in his hand.
	Thank you for inviting me into your living room tonight and all this other kind of stuff.
	He realized that he was coming into the home.
	He would never do anything like we see being done by Netflix and the rest of these people.
	Netflix has gone through its big purge because they put out...
	Child pornography, literal child pornography produced in Europe.
	I think it's France. You know, cuties or something like that.
	And that's not the only thing that they've done like that.
	But you look at what comes into your home.
	The sex, the violence, and all the rest of this stuff.
	It truly is amazing.
	And how did we get to that point?
	Very gradually. You know, we went from straight-up archetypes of heroes with the black-and-white westerns of the 1950s and stuff.
	You go back and you look at those programs and you look at how straight-up the heroes were.
	Then gradually, violence comes in.
	Sex comes in. We start making the heroes not quite the good guys and so forth.
	It's both Hollywood and television.
	And before you know it, we're celebrating evil.
	It's being pushed to us all the time.
	It truly is amazing. And to think that it's, you know, the argument is, well, we are reflecting culture.
	We're not shaping it.
	No, they're shaping it. They're shaping it.
	And they're reinforcing it.
	And even if they're reflecting something that is out there, they put it in an echo chamber and they intensify it with deafening feedback.
	So where are we as a society?
	Well, we're at the point where we don't really care if we rip babies apart.
	Republican politicians don't care about it either.
	We've established what they are, murderers.
	We're just haggling over the number of weeks.
	And yet it is not only acceptable to most people in America, but it is put out there now by the Biden administration.
	They're going to run on this as if it were a virtue.
	There's an interesting article on liveaction.org.
	Talking about another house of horrors for abortion, you know, we had Gosnell up in Pennsylvania, Kermit Gosnell, filthy place.
	He had a morbid curiosity of keeping dead babies around.
	Eventually had an immigrant woman of color, an illegal alien, who died because things went wrong in his filthy abortion mill.
	And the way the place was laid out, you couldn't even get any cots or stretchers in there to get her to some help, and so she died.
	But there were also cases there where he killed some full-term babies, and it was such a strange violation.
	He would have been fine if we had taken these babies that were born that were very mature, as he said, one of the kids.
	He said, hey, this kid could walk down and catch a bus type of thing.
	If he would have set them off to the side and let them die, starve to death or whatever, gradually, there would have been no crime under the law.
	But because he put them out of their misery, so to speak, they got him from murdering two babies and the death of the woman who was there.
	And, of course, we had Ralph Northam.
	The governor of Virginia, who was trained as a doctor, he didn't say anything unusual about that.
	He talked about comfort care, and that's where most people found out about it.
	But it was a shock to the jurors in the Kermit Gosnell trial to hear that there was such a thing as what they call euphemistically comfort care.
	Like, what? You set the baby over there and you let the baby die, and then when Ralph Northam said it, then the nation heard it.
	They tried to get people to understand that when...
	A fellow McAleer did the film Gosnell.
	They'd done a book about it, and they did a courtroom drama about it.
	And the center part of that film was where the jurors, all of them pro-abortion, were horrified to find out what this thing called comfort care really was.
	Well, this is another house of horrors.
	Abortion Media Allies writes liveaction.org.
	And other abortion propagandists are manipulating the public into believing that big abortion is merely an extension of the American healthcare sector.
	Now, by the way, that would be bad enough because the healthcare sector in America has become hired killers as well during the 2020 stuff.
	But actually, they're far worse.
	An article published by The Pitch in 2005 detailed a filthy abortion clinic in Kansas City, Kansas, The facility which operated under the noses of health inspectors was accused of having roaches running rampant, of having fetal remains stored in the refrigerator, and even a wild allegation that the abortionist ate aborted fetuses for lunch.
	That sounds really crazy, doesn't it?
	That can't be true.
	Well, these are allegations that were made by the Kansas Attorney General at the time.
	These are allegations that were made by police detectives that were there.
	And as these allegations are being made by the people who are there, one of the police detectives said to, one of the people they're talking to said, look, I'm a cop and people lie to me all the time.
	But you're going to be asked these questions by the Attorney General.
	And if you lie to him, you're going to go to jail.
	Now, did that really happen?
	Yes, it did. Wow.
	So what happened to the abortion clinic?
	Well, and why haven't you heard this?
	Why haven't I heard this before?
	Well, they managed to kind of cover this up.
	The clinic was operated by an abortionist, Krishna Rajana, keeping aborted fetuses and styrofoam cups in the freezer.
	And later heating them up and stirring them into his lunch, they said, among other allegations, specifically from these people.
	Now, when it was reported by secondary media, the pitch, never heard of that, in 2005, their headline was to make a joke about it.
	Mm-mm, good, they said, like it's Campbell's soup or something.
	And they recounted the allegations and laughed about it.
	That's where we are as a society.
	According to the 2005 report, a theft brought detectives William Howard Jr.
	and Stephen Mansaw to the facility in September of 2003.
	This is kind of the way they caught Kermit Gosnell as well.
	But while the theft allegation was not proven, Detective Howard claimed that he was shocked by the conditions that he and Mansaw found.
	There were dirty dishes in the sink and on a tabletop.
	Trash was strewn around.
	Roaches crawled across the countertops.
	They said, as we proceeded through the facility, I noted the back area was very dark and dingy looking with poor lighting and smelling musty.
	We entered the break room to interview Rajana.
	There were dirty dishes in the sink and on the tabletop, trash everywhere, roaches crawling around the countertops with the smell of stench in the room.
	Frankly, I was reluctant to sit down.
	I noted that there weren't containers for medical waste with universally recognized hazardous waste labels on them.
	You know, that's the... Intersecting sharp looking circle things on it.
	On the way out, my partner observed that the, quote, procedure room, unquote, was filthy.
	He told me that he saw dried blood on the floor and that the room looked nasty to him, Detective Howard added.
	They took pictures of this, which are in the article.
	He said, also noted that the assistants seemed to be running everything even though they were barely out of their teens and there were no credentials on the wall.
	All of this, except for the allegations of the cannibalism, all this was something that was very similar to what happened with Kermit Gosnell.
	And yet, as they bring this stuff in, you have people who are in the legal side of things say, well, I can't really think of what to charge them with.
	Really? You know, we see this all, they can get really, really creative, can't they, for things like January the 6th?
	Or if they really want to, can't law enforcement and prosecutors?
	They can get really, really, really creative with charges.
	When they say they can't think of anything to charge somebody with, they're not really trying, are they?
	The aborted fetuses were placed inside styrofoam cups and put in a refrigerator freezer next to TV dinners.
	The female witness went on to describe how she and other girls actually witnessed Rajana microwave one of the aborted fetuses and stir it into his lunch.
	The witness claimed other employees had seen him do the very same thing.
	And so they look at this and they say, well, you know, maybe so, but, you know, where's the crime in that?
	We just had a situation here in America.
	I don't know the details of the person.
	I just saw the headline. I haven't read the article, but people were horrified to take pictures of a guy who was eating a human leg standing on the sidewalk.
	It was a severed limb from somebody who'd been hit by a train and he picked up some kind of homeless guy or some undocumented migrant newcomer who picked up the leg and started eating it.
	We're getting into some really dark territory here because the government and the schools are pushing it this way.
	So again, he told these employees, look, you're lying to me.
	People lie to me all the time as a cop, but you're going to go to jail if you lie to the attorney general, the district attorney, whatever.
	And they continued with the story.
	But the warning fell on deaf ears in March of that year.
	The Board of Healing Arts investigator conducted surprise inspections of his facility, found conditions there had actually worsened.
	So they give him a warning.
	They say, we can't think of what to charge him with.
	But he doesn't care.
	And he continues to do it.
	As if the 2005 reports about the facility were not horrific enough, the abortionist was later accused of throwing private medical records into the trash, and on and on.
	So we see this constantly, and yet this is what the Democrats want to run on.
	This is why it's so contemptible for Republicans to say, well, this is a losing issue.
	I just don't want to carry the burden of this issue around with me.
	There's something else going on with these people, folks.
	It's the easiest thing in the world to really pick this ball up and run with it.
	The only person who's done that, as I mentioned again, I don't remember her name, but progressive Democrat, Who is running for office so that she can show pictures of what they do to these babies that they murder.
	And they have to run her commercials because she's running for Congress.
	And so remember that whenever you hear a Republican like Trump or anybody underneath him say, well, this is a abortion issue.
	It's just too hard to talk about.
	You don't have to talk about it at all.
	You just show the pictures and let the pictures do the talking.
	People will understand. Just like they did with Google AI. Oh, that's ridiculous.
	Look at that. I asked it for, you know, people and draw me some people in 1700 Scotland, you know, and they're all black and Asian because it hates white people.
	You get it with a picture right away.
	You show those photographs of what they're doing to babies and this would be a winning issue.
	But they don't want to take the moral high ground on all this stuff.
	That is what's so key about all of this, is that they don't want to take the moral high ground.
	On Rockfin, Gard Goldsmith.
	Good to see you there, Gard. Of course, Gard will be doing the show on Thursday and Friday.
	Thank you for the tip.
	He says, David, I've been listening as I work on MRC items.
	He works for MRC TV as well.
	I had to dive in with the audience to send out, cheer to everyone, and thank you for your valuable work.
	Every day, you and the chat contributors say, Bring such insights and love.
	Can't beat it. Can't wait to fill in on Thursday and Friday.
	I hope to do a good job.
	Well, I know you will. Always, always do.
	Guard, you know, I really like, Guard sends out a Sunday digest, or if you subscribe to him on Substack.
	And he always picks up really interesting articles.
	And articles that even though I look through dozens of different places, he always comes up with stuff that I haven't seen before.
	So Guard does a great job.
	If you haven't subscribed to Substack, you need to.
	And Beth2112, thank you very much.
	And Beth writes, thank you for standing for the truth, David.
	I appreciate you. From Beth Baldwin.
	Well, thank you very much. I really do appreciate the help from everyone.
	And again, I'll just remind everybody, if you're just tuning in, that Marty has offered to match the tips that we get today.
	And I really do appreciate that.
	He gave us four coupons.
	And so we're going to use the spring coupon today as we're at the end of the month.
	We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	Hear news now at APSRadioNews.com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story.
	This is a story about a man who was a soldier.
	He was a soldier.
	A man who was a soldier.
	Your support is essential.
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	War Without Rules.
	This is a LifeSite News article, and they're talking about The situation that is unfolding in Gaza.
	A war without rules.
	And I've talked about this.
	It's interesting. They did not go back to Augustine's formulation of what a just war is.
	Something that Western civilization has focused on for a long time.
	But I've talked about this many times.
	If you are attacked, you have a right to respond.
	But that is tempered by the fact that you want to try to limit...
	Civilian casualties, not maximize them.
	And that the goal of your response, your retaliation, should not be to completely wipe out the enemy to every last man, woman, and child.
	But it should be to end hostilities.
	That should be your goal as quickly as possible.
	So you want to minimize civilian casualties.
	You want to end the war as soon as possible.
	Not prolong it forever, as we're seeing with all these wars that we're involved in.
	And even as we see with the American government, preemptive war.
	Yeah, that was a day of infamy when the Japanese did it, and it's still wrong.
	But we're doing what they did.
	And so it really has become a war without rules.
	It's become a war where, depending on your perspective and what you think about the two sides, and again, I've not talked about this because I don't want to try to interject myself into the fog of war where everybody is lying about something.
	Or maybe about everything.
	And try to figure out who did what to whom and with what motivations.
	But what we do know is that people have been rounded up into one area, deliberately being starved.
	As food trucks came up with some food, people rushed the food truck.
	The soldiers on it, perhaps because they were scared, thought people were coming after them, they fired and killed people.
	So they show up with food, people run for the food, and they shoot and kill them.
	And some people have said that was a deliberate setup.
	They wanted that to happen.
	I believe that it's more likely that these are young troops and they're panicking.
	This is why you try to avoid having wars.
	Because you're always going to have, in the fog of war, things go wrong.
	Or because of hatred, people will commit atrocities deliberately.
	So, it should be ended.
	But there's no interest in ending it.
	And then, of course, the U.S. government, I think, were the ones who dropped the food.
	But as they dropped food, well, airlift food in.
	Some of the parachutes did not deploy.
	Massive crates came in, completely destroyed one house, killed people inside of it, but just came down like bombs.
	Is that incompetence?
	Is that deliberate? What is it?
	It's probably incompetence. The U.S. military can't even deliver food without killing the people that they're supposedly trying to help.
	So then they decide they're going to build a pier.
	Oh, that's to bring in food.
	But now we see, no, that's going to be taking people out.
	Many people have said, well, this is going to be a real threat to the American soldiers there.
	If they're taking people out, they might have terrorists who come on with suicide bombs or something and take out all these soldiers, the ship, or whatever.
	This is a stupid idea, and it is a stupid idea.
	Except what's an even dumber idea is that it appears that these people are going to be deported.
	You've got Jared Kushner and other people saying, well, we've got to clear this out so that we can start selling this property and doing some seaside resorts or whatever.
	And we can ship the people to Europe and to America.
	They'll take the people that we don't want around us because they're too dangerous.
	I mean, this is absolutely reprehensible.
	And it's another reason why we need to have people who have some moral character.
	Instead, we're looking at these people.
	They're using their Henry Kissinger-style geopolitical analysis.
	As Kissinger said, we have no permanent allies.
	We only have permanent interests.
	That kind of ruthless calculation that has absolutely no consideration of people morally, that is reprehensible.
	It totally is reprehensible.
	And it is a massive PR failure on the part of Israel, as well as the United States.
	And so in the face of all this now, the back and forth between Candace Owen and I've not followed this soap opera.
	I don't really care.
	I've seen some people commenting on it, and I think some of their comments about it are kind of interesting.
	I mean, certainly she takes one side of this conflict, and her boss there, Ben Shapiro, took another side of the conflict.
	A lot of people are heaping scorn on them for firing her, but look, I think it's legitimate for them to fire her if they disagree.
	She doesn't have a right to work for them.
	It's the same situation that I was in with Alex.
	I was surprised, really, that I was there that long, and then after a certain point in time, I figured, well, I guess he's not going to fire me because he wants to have an opposing voice that he can fall back on, since he's obviously knowingly lying to people about the pandemic and about January the 6th.
	He'd like to say, well, yeah, but we had...
	Knight was saying this and so forth.
	And then he fired us a week before Christmas.
	That surprised me.
	He fired Travis.
	That surprised me.
	But he had a right to fire me.
	We disagreed. I opposed him on air over the lies that he was telling people that he knew were lies.
	I knew he knew.
	We had conversations about it.
	You know, he knew he was lying to people about spreading fear about the pandemic, telling people that the vaccine was sugar water, telling people that they're going to fix the election on January the 6th, telling people that two days after the election, we had blockchain watermarks and ballots, and the National Guard were out arresting people two days after the election.
	All of that was a lie.
	All of it. In order to make money.
	And so, you know, I understand if you're going to oppose somebody that, you know, they would fire you on that.
	But it's been kind of interesting back and forth, people looking at this and commenting on it.
	There was a guy that I saw a comment on Twitter from, somebody I know nothing about except this short clip that I've seen from him.
	I looked up his background a little bit, and because of the comments that he had to say, I thought were really strange.
	His name is Andrew Klavan.
	He is a writer, but he also got picked up by Shapiro's Daily Wire, I think it is, as a commentator.
	And he was taking Shapiro's side against Candace Owens.
	And he had some very interesting things to say.
	He believes that, you know, she wrote in one of these statements, Christ is king.
	And he thinks that is anti-Semitic.
	And it's kind of interesting because this guy is Jewish, but he says that he became a Christian.
	We'll talk about that in a moment.
	But he thinks to say Christ is king is anti-Semitic.
	You know, when I did this, by the way, the priest who baptized me said, you know, Christians won't accept you.
	You'll still be a Jew. And I said, well, I am.
	That's my race. I'm a Jew. I'm proud of my race.
	It's a great race. It's done many, many great things, including write the Bible.
	And, you know, I am a Jew.
	But that hasn't happened at all. Christians have welcomed me with open arms, except this Christ the King anti-Semitic crowd.
	Christ is the king, and one day every knee will bow and recognize that because he's not just my king, he's king of the universe.
	But when you use that phrase to mean that God has abandoned his chosen people, the Jews, Through whom he came into this world incarnate, and that he's broken his promises, his covenant with the Jews.
	You are quoting scripture like Satan does in the Bible.
	You are quoting scripture to your purposes, and that to me is specifically wicked.
	You know, when you spit that phrase at Ben Shapiro...
	Life is not a game show where you guess the name of God and you get to go to heaven.
	Honk, you know, yes, the name is Jesus.
	I look at Ben's life and I think if Ben were to embrace Jesus Christ, it would cause devastation to his family, to the people who love him, to the people who listen to him, to his position in the world.
	I just have this feeling that God has put this guy where he wants him, to do what he wants him to do.
	And as you know, I feel that Isn't that interesting?
	Yeah, it wasn't. Jesus said, you know, I didn't come here to bring peace.
	He came here to bring peace between man and God, but not between men and men.
	You know, you're going to have people within a family fighting each other over what they believe, type of thing.
	And it is an offense to people.
	I think it's really strange that somebody, and I looked up, it's like, he was baptized into what church?
	And it was like Episcopalian or something like that.
	Clearly, like Ben Shapiro, he doesn't believe that the Bible is something that God gave us, but he believes it's something that some men wrote, some Jewish men, he said.
	Yeah, Jews gave you the Bible.
	Well, it's not just that.
	You know, we don't believe that it was simply written by men.
	We believe that it was inspired by God.
	And that's a very different thing.
	So to treat it, whether or not, it depends on how you treat it.
	Is it God's word or is it man's word?
	That makes all the difference in the world.
	You know, Ben Shapiro has said, when he was asked, I think it was Joe Rogan who asked him, so do you believe in miracles?
	Do you believe that Moses parted the Red Sea?
	Of course, it wasn't Moses, but it was God who parted the Red Sea for Moses.
	But do you believe that?
	Oh, no, no, no, I don't believe that, says Shapiro.
	And I was absolutely amazed.
	He doesn't believe that God parted the Red Sea.
	As a part of the Exodus.
	For people to get to the promised land.
	He wants the secular, temporary stuff.
	The land. But he doesn't want the God that comes with it.
	He doesn't want the supernatural power that's there.
	He's going to do it in his own strength.
	You know, God does not honor that.
	From anyone. But this whole idea that Christ the King is anti-Semitic.
	You know, this goes back to, take a look at Facebook, where I began earlier.
	The fact that somebody puts up a Bible verse, any Bible verse, even a Bible verse of sheep, talking about Christ as the good shepherd or whatever.
	Oh, that's an offense. Why?
	Well, because it's the Bible.
	And there's things in the Bible that I don't like.
	So, I'm going to just shut that down.
	And that's what Andrew Clavin is doing with this Christ the King thing.
	It's not anti-Semitic.
	And, you know, you can find Christians who will say anything.
	And, of course, you can find Jewish people who will say anything as well.
	You know, the joke is you get, and it was a Jewish joke about Jewish people, saying you get three Jews in a room and you'll have five opinions or something, you know.
	But the same thing is true Christians, especially when you're looking at religion.
	And so we ought to be able to have an open discussion without canceling people because you disagree with them.
	And I'm not talking about the firing of Candace Owen.
	I think it's fine for Ben Shapiro to fire her if he disagrees with her.
	He doesn't have to hire her.
	This is different than being kicked off of the public square off of social media.
	I see those as two very different things.
	If they want to fire her, that's fine.
	I have a big problem if Twitter or Facebook shuts down the digital public square.
	I think that is wrong.
	But, yeah, you don't have a right to work for anybody.
	And if you disagree, you know, you can leave.
	I didn't leave because I wanted access to a bigger audience.
	And so I was going to stay there, and I was going to warn people about what the other people on that network were telling people.
	Hey, these guys are lying to you, you know, and do that until I get fired.
	But, you know, it's legitimate to fire me.
	That's fine. But, yeah.
	You know, the issue is, if Christ is not king, who is your Lord?
	And what is Christianity about, if you don't acknowledge that?
	Is it really just honking a horn?
	Did he do something like getting baptized and now he's in with God?
	If he doesn't believe what God says?
	At which point do you digress from this?
	Because what you know about this is based on the Bible.
	So you're going to take some of it, but you're going to reject the rest of it?
	You have to understand that what is happening with Facebook, what is happening with a lot of these things, what is happening with the Christian nationalism label and all the rest of this stuff, It's an attempt to silence people, just like Facebook was doing.
	They want to categorically silence people who are Christians.
	And again, it doesn't have to be anything that is harmful or hurtful.
	Saying Christ is king, there's nothing wrong with that, but he makes that into something that is, as he says, racist.
	Again, I don't see different races.
	I think we see people of different skin color, but they're the same race.
	We're all the human race. And God has made of all nations one blood.
	There's different tongues, there's different tribes, and there's different nations that have different borders, different languages, different borders, different cultures, that type of thing.
	But there's not different races.
	And so, you know, we need to understand where the commonality is.
	We need to understand that God did not reject the Jews.
	The Jews rejected God, is a Christian perspective on it.
	And a lot of the same people, you know, from Peter to the massive crowd that was there, changed and did not reject God.
	They embraced God later, they repented of that and embraced God.
	God is always there in forgiveness.
	And it's not our position to determine who is in or out.
	We're not here to judge people.
	We're here to tell people what the truth is.
	And the truth is, Christ is King.
	And you're not going to back us down from this.
	All this Christian nationalism labeling that's out there is not going to intimidate us.
	The Facebook censorship is not going to intimidate us.
	Calling us racist, calling us anti-Semitic is not going to intimidate us.
	We know what the truth is.
	I just have to ask people like Andrew Klavan, how many times are you going to side with censorship?
	You think that's a winning issue to side with censorship?
	You've got some major problems that you don't understand.
	You're always trying to shut down anybody that you disagree with.
	That's going to backfire on you just like this Gaza attack is backfiring on you as well, and rightfully so.
	David Icke said, I'm not saying a word about the sacking of my friend Candace Owens for criticizing Israel because I want to keep my job at the Daily Wire, and to do that, you don't say anything in the least bit critical about the Israel firsters who did it.
	As he was responding to what Daily Wire host Michael Knowles said about it, he said, this is the castrated quote-unquote new media.
	Well, I think that there is so much intimidation of people.
	Everyone knows that if you say certain things, you're not going to be able to be on the radio.
	It's a very awkward situation for me to be a conservative who doesn't support Trump.
	I support the principles of conservatism.
	Trump doesn't. He's not a conservative.
	He's a New York Democrat.
	He's a pro-abortion, pro-gun control, pro-spend all the money you can think of without any accountability Democrat.
	He's a corrupt reprobate.
	And I can't understand why Christians try to project Christian values onto him.
	He has no Christian values that he's talked about or exhibited.
	He will not keep his word about the Constitution or any of these principles.
	And yet, if I oppose him, you know, I get hate mail all the time.
	Oh, yeah, I like what you have. But I can't stand the fact you don't support Trump.
	I'll never support Trump.
	Ever. Ever.
	I don't support Biden either.
	So, you know, again, you got to, which horse are you going to, we got to be on one of these two sides.
	Well, who do you want to be president?
	Nobody that's running.
	Literally, nobody, literally none of these, none of the above here.
	This I thought was an interesting comment.
	Yeah. Barry Weiss, who is a part of the Twitter papers, right, brought in by Elon Musk, and she said that it took the Daily Wire this long to sever ties with Candace Owen is alarming.
	Well, again, she doesn't support free speech and she wants people fired who disagree with her.
	But again, I think that, you know, clearly they were on polar opposites of this issue.
	And if he wants to fire her, he's welcome to do it.
	Now, these are a couple of things I did not validate, but I thought it was interesting.
	I've not seen this before, so I'll take a look at it, see if I can see if this is true.
	This is by somebody called Low Key.
	So it seems Candace Owens has been cancelled by Ben Shapiro on the Daily Wire for opposing Israel's genocide in Gaza.
	The Daily Wire is funded by CAP Technologies, K-A-P-E Technologies, whose CEO is Israeli intelligence Duvdevan unit veteran Ido Ehrlichman.
	Shapiro and the co-founder of The Daily Wire, Jeremy Boring, both helped Israel lobbyist Dennis Prager set up the YouTube channel at Prager University, where they worked under Israeli Unit 8200 Military Intelligence veteran Marissa Streit.
	Well, again, you know, I don't know if that connection is true with Israeli Unit 8200.
	It's like the British have a military unit...
	For censorship, and by the way, if you didn't know, so does America.
	The censorship is deeply tied into the military.
	DARPA was there at the very beginning to create the internet as a means of propaganda, of censorship, of surveillance.
	When it became practical, the American military, the Pentagon, and the intelligence community gave money to these different corporations.
	I would not be surprised if this was true on the Israeli side.
	Because you need to understand that the internet, social media, and all the rest of the stuff is all a product of the American military and intelligence community, the Israeli military and intelligence community, the Chinese military and intelligence community.
	The whole thing is a PSYOP. Now, you still may be able to get to some information.
	I mean, you can find me in the corners of the internet.
	You can find other people who are going to be honest.
	But you need to evaluate that in the light of the fact that That the entire internet was designed as psychological warfare.
	And so you need to keep that in the back of your mind.
	That's true of everybody, everywhere.
	You know, again, trust no one.
	And when it comes to politicians, you need to bind them down with the chains of the Constitution, as they say.
	Church of England. Archdeacon.
	Who turns out to be a female.
	Surprise, surprise. You know, another, as James Carville would say, a preachy woman.
	Well, she's a preachy archdeacon who is preaching about anti-whiteness.
	You know, the same like the struggle session we showed you in China.
	Denounce yourself. Smash the patriarchy, she said.
	She's called for anti-whiteness.
	See, you can't just not be racist.
	You have to be anti-white.
	This is the Chinese struggle session approach.
	And she wants to smash the patriarchy, presumably, so she can establish a matriarchy.
	She's called for anti-whiteness, and she's a Church of England archdeacon.
	Other people have criticized her as being divisive, which of course she is.
	And then in Boston...
	We have this announcement, these people demanding reparations from white churches.
	We call on the white church in Boston to join us in supporting a black reparations movement.
	Standing in solidarity, clergy leaders from across the city of Boston gathered for an interfaith, multiracial meeting at the Resurrection Lutheran Church in Roxbury, Nubian Square.
	They're here to ask the religious community to atone for black Boston suffering and support black reparations.
	And we are coming as Dr. King.
	King said. Organizers from the Boston People's Reparation Commission say they're also following up on their demand on the city of Boston for a $15 billion initial payout to begin the process towards repair and reconciliation to the city's black community.
	$5 billion as initial payment around cash payouts.
	$5 billion around strengthening our financial institutions, creating a new black bank.
	Five billion dollars in terms of addressing issues of the education achievement gap between blacks and whites.
	In 2022, the Boston City Council and Mayor Michelle Wu offered an official apology for the city's involvement in the transatlantic slave trade.
	Again, you know, we've talked about this before.
	It is interesting this has come back to the churches because I think that's really where the primary failure is.
	The churches that have failed to talk about the commonality of man, but more importantly have failed to talk about the fact that the wrongs done by us were paid for by Christ on the cross.
	That is the Christian position.
	Why can't the churches say that?
	And also as a part of that, it's not just the wrongs that were done by us, but the wrongs that were done to us.
	And if you can't leave that at the cross, as God says, if you don't forgive others, you yourself will not be forgiven.
	If you want the forgiveness for the things that you have done wrong, you have to leave the grudge and the vengeance of things that were done to you there as well.
	And so these churches that are there, that are being, you know, getting the screws put against him, they have failed to even tell people what the fundamental act of Christ is on the cross.
	So it doesn't surprise me that this stuff is coming back to haunt them.
	Audi, Modern Retro Radio.
	It says, I'm amazed that people like Candace Owen, Ben Shapiro, and the others have such a large following.
	They are state actors.
	Yes, that's true. The question is, which state are they acting for?
	And it is a play that is there to get people pitted against each other.
	White against black. Jews against Christians and so forth.
	That's what this is all about.
	So that as we're fighting amongst each other, They can rob, cheat, steal, and kill us.
	Nobody talks about the lockdown.
	Nobody talks about the theft involved in all of that.
	The theft of our civil liberties and other things.
	We did not even get to the end of the program here.
	We didn't get to the pandemic treaty.
	I'll talk about it tomorrow because tomorrow is when they're going to be beginning the voting on.
	But we have another comment here that I want to get before we run out of time.
	On Rumble, I don't know how to pronounce that, but thank you for the tip.
	It says, Thank you, David, for your words of wisdom, but please pray for my family.
	My son sadly passed away at the young age of 20 years old.
	We love him so much.
	He was a brave, kind-hearted man.
	Long love Javier.
	My son was a baseball coach.
	The boys came up with a saying.
	Long live Javier, I think is what it's supposed to be.
	I'm so sorry.
	And I cannot even imagine what that is like.
	Yes, we pray that God will take you through this.
	Our life is so short.
	What matters the most is the eternity comes after this very, very, very, very brief life.
	You think of our life as a dot and eternity as an infinite line coming after that.
	And what do we say when...
	We lose somebody, especially at a young age.
	God tells us that the death of his loved ones is a blessing in his sight.
	And it is something that God is looking to reunite with all of us.
	It is difficult for those of us who are left behind.
	We don't want to see our loved ones suffer in the process, and we don't want to lose them.
	And so it is so difficult for us, and so I'm so sorry for you and for your loss.
	But as you said, as you're asking for prayer, just understand, if you're a Christian, you're going to have a reunion.
	This is a momentary separation.
	We have tears when we depart each other for a period of time to go live in another area.
	Maybe that it's going to be years before we see somebody.
	And that is even worse when we know that there's not any chance that we're going to see that person again in this life.
	But understand that this is just the beginning.
	And understand that God has a purpose in everything that He does.
	And I'm so sorry for your loss.
	But I want to thank everybody for standing with us and for your generosity and your kindness in supporting this program.
	I'll just read this card here.
	This is from Stacy, who wrote this.
	She said, Today is 3-5 and your show was out.
	I don't know what I did on 3-5, but she liked it.
	She said, Today you inspired me to stop working, sit down and write this, and to do my own matching of my own monthly contributions.
	She says she usually sends...
	50, but she sent 100 with us.
	Incredibly generous. Thank you so much.
	She said, like you, I try to keep my life simple.
	And my husband would say, Stacy, you always say simplicity is the key.
	And I think it is, if we understand what really matters.
	Thank you for joining us.
	Let me tell you, the David Knight Show, you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	Ha ha ha! And you want to know something else?

▲