Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 25, 2024 - The David Knight Show

02:57:29

The David Knight Show - 03/25/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	I don't know if people died with a PCR test that was positive, or if they died from any particular disease, that one in particular, or was it just flu?
	Was it respiratory illness?
	Was it neglect from the hospitals?
	The hospitals actually cause this with their ventilator treatment and remdesivir and neglect and do not resuscitate orders and all the rest of this stuff.
	They're paid to kill people.
	They're paid to give them novel treatments that have never been done for respiratory illnesses before.
	And they had the expected result, quite frankly.
	But again, even if it is a PCR test that is positive, I spent a lot of time the last several years talking about the PCR test and how suspect they were when they were magnified with the number of cycles that they've got here.
	1.1 trillion times magnification as Kerry Mullis, who invented it and got the Nobel Peace Prize, Nobel Prize in Science.
	As he said, you can't prove that AIDS is caused by a virus.
	Not with my PCR test you can't, he said.
	And he wanted to debate Fauci.
	He took Fauci on and they purged him because Fauci was pushing the AIDS and HIV connection at the time.
	And he was using the PCR test to do it.
	And Kerry Mullis was pushing back real hard.
	And some other scientists were.
	And they were canceled, just like we saw with the people who got in the way of the vaccination agenda this time.
	And so... The PCR test was suspect.
	The way it was used was suspect.
	All of this was suspect.
	But nevertheless, when you look at, let's just take it at their word.
	One out of 10,000 deaths, as he pointed out.
	Well, where are we with autism?
	He said the numbers for autism range from one out of 100 to one out of 30.
	Okay, so let's just go with their numbers.
	Let's say that you really do have a chance of 1 in 10,000 of dying from measles.
	But you've got a 1 in 30 chance of getting autism.
	Which one would you choose? Oh, sorry.
	We don't care about your informed consent.
	We're not going to talk about those numbers.
	And even if you know those numbers, we don't care.
	You're just a conspiracy theorist.
	No consent. I don't care what you think.
	You're going to give the MMR jab to your kids.
	Or, you know, as Trump said...
	It's really going around.
	They got to get it. You know, no religious exemptions, no medical exemptions for anyone.
	Got to get that thing, right?
	No exemptions whatsoever.
	Well, he says, I remember, says Robert, when I first heard Trump's own son was autistic.
	Where'd you hear that? I bet you heard that from Alex Jones, didn't you?
	He got Trump really annoyed with him by saying that Barron was autistic.
	I don't know if he is or not.
	I'm not interested in spreading rumors like that.
	I don't know.
	To me, the same people would say stuff like that, like Alex would say that.
	Well, rage when somebody makes a diagnosis of Trump's psychological conditions from a distance or something like that.
	They'll also embrace the diagnosis of Biden as being senile, although that's pretty obvious.
	That's really out there.
	He's wearing it on his sleeve. But nevertheless, when you start doing clinical diagnosis of things, they had people who were accusing Barry Goldwater of all people.
	The way they smeared Goldwater was to say that he was unstable and What did they say about Trump?
	But they said he was unstable and other things.
	And afterwards, they came out and they said, you know, the American Psychiatry Association or whatever their official name is, said, we're not going to do that anymore.
	You don't make any...
	It's unethical to make these diagnoses unless you have examined that person specifically.
	So whether or not Trump's son has autism, it was sold...
	By Alex. Oh yeah, Trump knows about it.
	And Trump was selling his vaccine skepticism.
	He sold his vaccine skepticism to big pharmaceutical companies by bringing an RFK Jr.
	to Trump Tower. That's how he bid his price up.
	He got a million dollars from Pfizer alone.
	And then he put in, as the head of HHS, Alex Azar, the CEO of Eli Lilly.
	Alex Azar was the one who spearheaded all this pandemic and lockdown stuff.
	So, yeah, he says, he said, I remember in 2016, the talk about Trump's son being autistic.
	He said, surely, I hoped, something will be addressed.
	Perhaps he'll assign a team.
	Perhaps he'll have an investigation.
	Maybe they'll reverse course again.
	It says nothing. In fact, just the opposite.
	Shoot up the entire population with another vaccine that's never been tested, another novel way to do this.
	And if you think that these people are going to change anything because one of their family members dies, you really don't understand the mentality of the elite.
	Do you think the royal family is going to come out in opposition to the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines?
	She had one or the other.
	They know it was one of those two, but they don't know which.
	When you go back and you look at her original vaccination, That she made a big display out of.
	Do you think they're really going to attack the system with that?
	No. No.
	They are trying to preserve something that is far more important to them than their own family members even.
	This is the problem that we have when we try to put ourselves in the mindset of these people who are pulling this stuff.
	We're running this global depopulation game.
	You really can't understand the mentality any more than you can understand the mentality of a mass murderer, a serial killer, somebody like that.
	You can't put yourself into their mind frame as a sane person.
	This is one of the reasons why someone like Ted Bundy was so successful in deceiving people.
	He seemed like such a nice man.
	So intelligent. So attractive.
	And yet... Murdering and raping one woman after the other.
	And that was part of it, his ability to trade on our projection of normalcy onto these people.
	They're not normal.
	They don't think like you think.
	They have a completely different frame of reference.
	And so let's talk about Kate with cancer.
	And, you know, I've got to say, the first thing I thought when I saw this was not about the vaccine, honestly.
	First thing I thought was, and so it goes with everyone.
	It doesn't matter what your station in life is.
	It doesn't matter how much money you've got, you know.
	Bill Clinton will die.
	He was president. He's Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk.
	They think they're going, some of these technocrats really do think they're going to live forever.
	But they all really kind of think they're going to live forever, even if they're not doing anything about it.
	You know, you got some of these people like Ray Kurzweil, he's out there.
	I'm going to make a robot. I'm going to go inside the robot.
	It's like, okay, fine. What are you?
	How are you going to get in that robot?
	You're going to make a copy of the electrical signals in your brain?
	Is that you? Or is that a copy of you?
	What is that? That's not even you.
	These people are so foolish.
	They don't understand there's a God.
	They certainly don't understand the difference between body, soul, and spirit.
	They had that conversation with Sultan Isfant, who was running for president as this thing he created called the Transhumanist Party.
	It was really a publicity tour for his idea of transhumanism and the book that he wrote.
	But, you know, I obliged and talked to him about what he thinks.
	Human nature is because the villains in his book were Christians.
	They were terrorists.
	Kind of like American Carol of the nun getting on the bus and pulling the cross out of a grenade and blowing up everybody on the bus.
	That kind of absurdity.
	That was Zoltan Isvan's take on Christianity.
	You actually had one of the key characters.
	I can't remember if it was the protagonist or the antagonist.
	It was named Knight. Anyway, it was an interesting interview, but that was years ago.
	But what I'm saying is that these people who are transhumanists, they think they're going to live forever, but they don't even know what they are.
	What is going on?
	What am I going to pass on?
	I don't know what it is. No, the reality is that we're all going to die.
	And it's tragic for those who are left behind.
	But for those who die, if they die in the Lord, it is the best thing that can happen to them.
	It's just a transition. It's a difficult transition.
	It's a difficult transition, no doubt about it, and we all dread that transition, even if we have a confident expectation that to die is to be present with the Lord.
	We still dread that, and rightfully so.
	Death is not a good thing.
	Death is a punishment.
	Death is bad. That's why Christ came to destroy death.
	We'll talk more about that, even though we've got some churches who are trying to run the other way from the resurrection on Easter.
	Resurrection Sunday is what we call it.
	They don't want to use that term.
	It's just too off-putting to talk to people about the blood.
	Yeah, you know, that's the thing.
	From the very beginning, in Genesis...
	God gives Adam and Eve animal skins.
	It's based on the death of an animal.
	It's based on blood because sin is a serious thing.
	You know, what they did was we look at it.
	It's like, well, what's the big deal? Nobody got hurt.
	What's the big deal? They ate some fruit.
	Well, it was a cosmic rebellion against God.
	And so the punishment for that...
	It's death. And so, you know, it is when you look at an animal that has died, no matter what it is, you don't have to be PETA, you still feel something for the animal that has died.
	You don't think anything about cutting down a plant, right?
	And eating a plant.
	It's very different.
	And the life is in the blood, as Leviticus tells us.
	It's an emblem of life and death.
	And so, this is the end that we all come to, regardless of our station in life, regardless of how rich we are, how pretty we are, how young we are.
	Even if we've got young children, this type of thing can happen to any of us.
	That was my first thought of it.
	But then, of course, the vaccine.
	She said, yesterday I received my first dose of COVID-19 vaccine at London's Science Museum.
	This is back in May of 2021.
	Here we are, just under three years later.
	I'm hugely grateful to everyone who is playing a part in the rollout.
	Thank you for everything that you are doing.
	Did they forget to give her the sugar water?
	That Alex was talking about, you know, just sugar water.
	Come on, you can take sugar water.
	You can do it for the team, right?
	Do it for Trump.
	Do it for the crown.
	Do it for this. Do it for that.
	Don't worry about the fact it hasn't been tested.
	Don't worry about the fact that this is brand new.
	As a matter of fact, I'm not going to cover it today, but there's a whistleblower from Pfizer.
	He recorded...
	A statement that was, you know, he's a new hire.
	They're talking about the vaccine.
	The lady up front, he's recording it.
	Talking about, you know, well, the mRNA stuff, it's not new.
	It's been around for a while. Moderna's been doing this for over 10 years, she said.
	And I talked about that.
	Talk was blue in the face.
	Do you realize this has been out there for 10 years?
	Do you realize that they've never had a product approved because it's so dangerous?
	Do you realize they've never had anything work?
	Do you realize that Moderna was a big pump and dump stock scam?
	They tell everybody, we've got a miracle cure for cancer, whatever.
	You know, pick your disease.
	We've got a miracle cure for it.
	It's a miracle. And then guess what?
	It doesn't do anything.
	It's like remdesivir or something.
	It kills you. It doesn't do anything to help.
	And that was the game they played for 10 years, until Trump came along.
	And Fauci, Trump and Fauci made them gazillionaires.
	Okay, so they say at the time, this was three years ago, they said that William, her husband, contracted COVID-19 last year in 2020, also got his first dose of vaccine there earlier this month.
	Wait a minute. Does William not know anything about natural immunity?
	This is another thing that I talked about until I was blue in the face.
	This whole thing about, well, you know, yes, even people who have been sick with this, and we say this is, you know, you had this severe respiratory illness, you had a positive PCR test, but we're still, we're going to say that you had COVID, but then we're going to say that you don't have immunity to it.
	Well, that's not the way the immune system works.
	If the immune system, your immune system is so busted that it can't respond to something like that, Then you die if it overwhelms your immune system.
	If your immune system is healthy enough to fight it off, your immune system will also remember.
	That's the way God designed it.
	Isn't it amazing what God has done?
	I mean, just stop and think about that.
	The amazing ability of your body, these, you know, single-cell organisms or whatever, I assume they're single-cell, show my ignorance in biology, but, you know, the immune system can identify things and then can kill them and remember them and pass on that memory to other cells as they continually replace each other.
	Isn't that amazing?
	Don't tell me that intelligence is not inherent in everything in our lives.
	Everything in our bodies is all intelligent design.
	That's one of the most amazing things, I think.
	And that's called natural immunity.
	And so, if William was infected with COVID-19 and he survived, he has immunity.
	And he has it for life, just like with measles.
	And it's absurd for him to take a vaccine.
	What is the purpose of a vaccine?
	A vaccine is there to train your body.
	To present you with some facsimile of the disease.
	This is the theory.
	Presents you with a facsimile of the disease so that your body can mount a defense and then remember it.
	But he's already had the real thing.
	And his body has already successfully defended it.
	And his body will remember it.
	So, it was stupidity, virtue signaling, whatever you want to call it.
	But you know, when we look at all of this, are we seeing an increase in cancer?
	Why, yes we are. Was that predicted?
	Yes, at the very beginning. You had Dr.
	Ryan Cole, a pathologist, who looked at people who had been vaccinated.
	And he said, it's killing their body's immune system, the killer T-cells.
	People who have been vaccinated have way fewer killer T cells than normal.
	And that's key in your body's defense against cancer.
	And so he said in the spring of 2020, over a year before Kate and William got their royal injections, he said you're going to see a massive increase in the frequency of cancer and the severity and rapidity of cancer.
	That was predictable, wasn't it?
	When you kill the killer T-cells.
	And so the question is, you know, we now have a situation where autism, absolutely unheard of, as I've said before.
	When I first heard of autism in the early 2000s, it was a family that we knew.
	They had a child who had a bit of it, and it's like, what is that?
	I've never heard of that. Never heard of it.
	Just like myocarditis and pericarditis and Thrombocytopenia, all these other things that now become part of our vocabulary.
	Why is that? Why are they so common now?
	What changed? The vaccines did.
	The vaccines made these conditions ubiquitous, whether it's autism or heart attacks for young people or maybe turbo cancer.
	Now we're going to see one out of every 30 people getting autism.
	Now we're going to see maybe one out of every 30 young people getting cancer that advances at a very rapid rate.
	Are we going to see one out of every 30 kids die from heart attacks at a very early age?
	And all this stuff just becomes normalized.
	The response by the system is to say, well, let's start doing EKGs for kids who are going to participate in sports.
	It's like, what? That's your response?
	And you're going to still keep vaccinating the kids?
	And then we'll give them EKGs.
	And maybe we'll be able to identify the problem before they die suddenly.
	They will never fix the problem because they're owned by the pharmaceutical companies who will never repent of their murders.
	Never. And so it's at the time that, well, we don't know which one they're going to get.
	They will be offered either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine.
	That is... The royal family, you know, what's his name?
	William. William and Kate.
	They'll get one on either Pfizer or Moderna, but it's not known which that either of the Cambridges received.
	And so, this was in September of last year.
	And it was from The Guardian.
	Big cheerleader of the pandemic.
	Big cheerleader of...
	Huh. All the MacGuffins, whether it's a climate MacGuffin or the pandemic and vaccine MacGuffin, the Guardian is always a big cheerleader of this stuff.
	And they just can't imagine why cancer cases and people under the age of 50 worldwide are up nearly 80%.
	Now, you look at this, this is in three decades.
	This is one of the things that they're doing.
	They know that this is exploding.
	So what do they do?
	Well, they go back three decades and To look at it.
	Oh, well, so this is something that is not the vaccine.
	It's been going on for three decades.
	Yeah, there's other things that are happening as well, but you notice that they cut this thing off at 2019.
	They cut it off before the vaccines.
	Experts are still in the early stages of trying to understand the reasons.
	Is it poor diet? Does it look to you like the princess Kate is eating Twinkies?
	No. Alcohol and tobacco use.
	I don't see her standing outside smoking a cigarette outside of Buckingham Palace, do you?
	Don't bogart that.
	The alcohol.
	Physical inactivity.
	She seems to be in pretty good shape.
	Obesity. Definitely not obese.
	So, are these the problems?
	It couldn't possibly be an experimental genetic code injection that kills killer T-cells, get it?
	No, we'll rule that out.
	And we'll go from 1990 to 2019.
	So, we don't want to include the shot.
	We'll tell people, this is already happening before we put the shots out, and it may have already been happening.
	We need to take a look at how it has spiked afterwards.
	I've talked about that many times as well.
	This is the way they cover it up, though, you see.
	Well, let's talk about the fact we had a 30-year trend before this.
	And then it explodes over a two-year, three-year period.
	And the key thing about the cancer is it doesn't kill you as quickly as some of the people who just dropped dead after they got the shot.
	We'd never seen that before.
	That was one of the ways that these poisoners, that we call pharmaceutical companies, that's one of the ways that these poisoners were able to get away with it, killing you gradually.
	You know, like arsenic and old lace.
	So, yeah, let's not look at the last two or three years.
	Let's kind of normalize this and get everybody to, yeah, for some reason it's just everything in our environment.
	Don't know what it is. Cancer's increasing.
	So, yeah, it just exploded the last couple years.
	But don't look at the genetic code injection.
	I'm sure it can't be that.
	So... So that was in September.
	Now, after this was released, you had the Telegraph in the UK. Do this story.
	Again, move people away from the idea that it could be the vaccine.
	As the Princess of Wales reveals diagnosis, doctors warn of mysterious cancer epidemic of younger people.
	Yeah, yeah, it's not the jab.
	No, the jab was the pandemic.
	The jab was the bioweapon.
	And they don't want you to see that subtitle.
	Researchers don't understand why.
	Just can't figure this out.
	Got a smoking gun right there in their lap.
	But the makers of the gun don't want them to talk about it.
	A significant increase in under 45s presented with cancer, typically seen in older patients.
	And this...
	Early onset of cancer, and this increase in cancer, is abdominal cancer, the same kind of cancer that she presumably has, since they haven't been specific about what kind of cancer she had, but it was just said that she was having an abdominal surgery.
	Then they come back and say, well, we found cancer.
	So let's say abdominal cancer might be a reasonable guess.
	Many of these people who are getting cancer at an early age are fit.
	Outwardly healthy, prompting a scramble among scientists to establish what could be causing the trend.
	I just can't imagine. And so they'd had a 20% increase from 1993 to 2019.
	Notice the same thing? They stop it at 2019.
	And they don't want to talk about what comes after that.
	We've had a lot of people who are not mainstream media, who are not The Telegraph, who are not Guardian, who are telling us how cancer has exploded in the last three years.
	So what do they do? They go back and they look at, well, yeah, there's this baseline thing that's happening out there because we've got a lot of things that can give people cancer in our environment.
	From the things that we're doing to our body, the lack of exercise, the poor food, food that is laced with all kinds of garbage, EMF, all these different types of things could be factors, especially together.
	But the one thing they don't want you to see is this worldwide depopulation shot by Trump.
	These cancers include those that come under the umbrella term abdominal.
	When I started as a cancer surgeon 20 years ago, you rarely saw any younger patients.
	But now I see them regularly, he said.
	When they turn up, they're shocked.
	These are people under the age of 45.
	Because often they haven't had any symptoms and because of their age, and they're not thinking about cancer.
	It's a huge thing to get your head around at that age, and of course many of them have young children.
	He said, my thoughts are with Kate and her family.
	They must have hit them like a bus.
	Oh, that's right. You know, none of us is promised tomorrow.
	We might be hit with cancer, or we might literally be hit with a bus.
	You know? So, that was the first thing I thought about.
	Some scientists believe the cause may be partly genetic.
	Might be a genetic code injection.
	Who knows? But we won't talk about that.
	But someone who will is Dr.
	Vernon Coleman. He was somebody who is a physician.
	He's an older commentator in the UK. And has some good insights.
	He's a very calm delivery since he's quite a bit older.
	But he wrote this.
	He said, Conspiracies, Cancer, Chemotherapy, and Kate.
	Sadly, Princess Kate got cancer.
	We wish her a speedy and complete recovery.
	Just why they needed to keep the truth secret for so long is a mystery.
	Though there may be an explanation which I will discuss in a moment, and I think he is spot on as to why they kept this withheld.
	He says, I was puzzled by the phrase preventative chemotherapy.
	I think the explanation is that the word preventative is rather superfluous and being used to emphasize the fact that Kate's condition is not terribly serious.
	In other words, I'm not going to tell you that she's in phase one, two, three, or four, something like that.
	They're kind of using preventative to put out whether it's true or not, the idea that they got it at an early stage.
	However, he says this doesn't completely explain why she's having chemotherapy, because there are risks.
	In a moment, I'll explain why I'm surprised.
	So he talks about chemotherapy.
	Again, he was a physician previously.
	But he says now about the conspiracy aspect and why it was really strange that they delayed this for so long.
	And allowed so many of these conspiracies to go out.
	And you've seen the backlash.
	All these people were saying, oh, well, I think, you know, she's been divorced or abducted or killed or this or that or aliens got or whatever.
	All these wild speculations that have been going on for the last few weeks.
	I didn't cover it because, frankly, I don't really care about celebrities.
	I don't really care about what happens with the royal family or Taylor Swift or her boyfriend or any of this stuff.
	But I did think that it was rather odd, the number and the intensity of all these conspiracy theories.
	Was this something that the government was ginning up?
	Did they want this to run wild?
	Well, that's basically what Dr.
	Cole says. Vernon Cole, he said, was it to, sorry, Coleman, Coleman is his name, Vernon Coleman, said, But he says, the royal family has allowed conspiracy theories to abound.
	Kate is dead.
	They didn't get a picture of her walking barefoot across the zebra crossing at Abbey Road.
	Kate and William are getting divorced.
	Kate has been captured by aliens, all the rest of this stuff, aliens.
	Could it possibly, just possibly be, says Vernon Coleman, that the conspirators who control the media allowed this nonsense to continue?
	And the conspiracy theories to become ever more absurd?
	In order to give themselves an excuse to clamp down on all so-called conspiracy theories.
	In other words, if you say that she was vaccinated and that's what this is, oh, you're starting with that stuff again.
	Leave her alone. We've had enough of this stuff.
	You guys have been making up all kinds of stories about her while she's suffering with a cancer diagnosis, and we remain silent.
	We didn't want to shut this thing down.
	She could have spoken at any point in time.
	Somebody from the royal family could have spoken.
	But they let this stuff run wild.
	Why is that? Again, do you think that even if a family member comes down with cancer because of this vaccine, even if they understood that, do you think that they would go public with it?
	I don't think so. And I think he's on to this.
	Dr. Vernon Coleman, I think he got it exactly right.
	They let this run for a very long time so they could shut down any talk about a connection between her cancer, and not just her cancer, the cancer of so many people around the world, in a similar situation, being tied to this heinous poison that Trump created and brags about to this day.
	So it lets them crack down on all conspiracy theories, maybe even to arrest anyone promoting anything that could be described as a conspiracy theory, to shut down any criticism of the vaccine.
	He says it will be easy for the government to make disapproving noises about the conspiracy theories about Kate, which abounded on the Internet.
	Yeah, we put out something like if I were to cut this out, for example, and title it, Trump Killed Princess Kate.
	I mean...
	The few remaining places where I am, I guess, they might even kick me off of Rumble, because I would be calling Trump a murderer, you know, but he is.
	He is a murderer. He is a murderer, by the way.
	I'll say that again. Trump is a murderer, one of the biggest mass murderers we've ever had, and yet you've got people falling down, literally worshipping this guy at his feet.
	People who call themselves Christians.
	Worshiping this guy. People who are so-called Christian leaders.
	And of course, these are Christian leaders who have big organizations where they make a lot of money.
	They have TV programs and all the rest of this stuff.
	It's a big business for them.
	They know which side of the bread they get buttered on.
	That's why they're worshiping Trump.
	They're worshiping the almighty dollar that he represents to them, the audience of suckers that they can rope in.
	But then he takes on chemotherapy, and this is important as well.
	Again, Dr. Vernon Coleman, a scary, staggering truth about the chemotherapy fraud.
	He said, patients who are diagnosed with cancer find themselves in a state of shock.
	And yet, while in a state of shock, they find themselves needing to make a number of vital decisions very quickly.
	One of the big questions is often this, should I have chemotherapy?
	Chemotherapy might improve a patient's chances of survival by 3-5%, though that modest figure is usually over-generous.
	For example, the evidence suggests that chemotherapy offers breast cancer patients an uplift and survival of a little more than 2.5%.
	This is down in the noise, folks.
	This is like... Well, it's almost as bad as what Fauci did with Remdesivir.
	It doesn't make any difference.
	As a matter of fact, we had more people die with it than didn't get it.
	But, you know, if you survive, you get better 30% faster.
	And that's his new standard of care.
	Never approved a drug on that kind of basis ever.
	You always had to show something.
	Even if it was only 2.5%, you had to show something.
	And so when you consider that chemotherapy can kill, That it does terrible damage to healthy cells and to the immune system.
	It's difficult to see the value of taking chemotherapy.
	As a matter of fact, when he says chemotherapy can kill us, what killed my father?
	My dad went in.
	He had cancer. They gave him his first dose of chemotherapy, went into a coma and died.
	Never came out of it. It did something to his immune system as well.
	It had a heart valve done prior to that, heart surgery.
	And they brought in a whole bunch of doctors and interns and everything and said, this is very rare.
	We've never seen this before.
	This is a very interesting case.
	Look at how this infection around his heart valve and all the rest of this stuff.
	It was an intellectual curiosity to them.
	But they killed my father with chemotherapy.
	Chances are the doctors looking after you, especially the specialist oncologists and hospitals, will recommend chemotherapy.
	They may push hard to get you to accept their recommendation.
	Dr. Vernon Coleman says it is important to remember that drug companies exist to make money.
	And so do hospitals.
	And so do doctors, for the most part.
	There's a few. A few doctors that are honest don't know about the hospitals.
	Not vouching for any of them.
	Uh, they exist to make money, and they will do whatever is necessary to further this aim.
	They lie, they cheat, with scary regularity.
	Yeah, like the CIA, like Pompeo said, yeah.
	Went to West Point, they told us, we don't lie, we don't cheat, we don't steal, we don't tolerate people who do.
	Then I went to the CIA, and, uh, we lie, we cheat, we steal, uh, we kill people, assassinate people, and we have classes on all of that stuff.
	Uh, so the, um, Pharmaceutical companies lie, cheat with scary regularity.
	They have no interest in helping patients or saving lives.
	Remember that the sole purpose of the drug companies is to make money, whatever the human cost might be.
	They will happily suppress potentially life-saving information if doing so increases their profits.
	It is my belief that by lying themselves to drug companies, cancer charities have become corrupt.
	And so have the doctors and so have the hospitals as well.
	He's in the UK, you know.
	The hospitals are run by the government there.
	Obviously they're corrupt. But years before this happened, back in May of 2018, and you can look it up.
	Look it up. It was reported widely, actually, by a lot of different media outlets, although nobody really kind of focused on it.
	I thought it was pretty amazing that Goldman Sachs was lecturing the pharmaceutical industry because Gilead, the makers of remdesivir, had come up with an actual cure.
	To one form of hepatitis.
	And they said, look at this. They made $12 billion the first year, but then it dropped off.
	They made like one or two billion the next year.
	Yes, that's just not acceptable.
	And then it went down from there.
	They said, that's not our business model.
	Our business model is not curing disease.
	Our business model is to treat chronic conditions.
	In other words, we don't want the condition to go away.
	We want to treat it. And folks, this is what happens when you look at a lot of the pro-life organizations out there.
	They don't want abortion to fully go away.
	And they certainly don't want it to go away as a national issue.
	That's why they're pushing for this renationalization of abortion laws.
	And that's why you've got a lot of Republican and Democrat politicians pushing for it as well.
	They don't want this issue to go away.
	And when it comes to guns, same type of thing.
	And you'll find pro-life organizations, you'll find some organizations like the NRA constantly selling people out on different issues as they sold us out on the Trump bump stock thing.
	The NRA did.
	Not gun owners of America.
	They understood the precedent that was being set.
	And not every pro-life organization is like that either.
	And, of course, they could have a difference of opinion with me as to whether or not they want to try to nationalize this.
	But I believe that this point of nationalizing it and these other things that they do and the cheerleading of this by some of these organizations, they want to be perceived as having an impact.
	But they don't want the problem to go away.
	And that's the way that it is with the pharmaceutical companies.
	That's the way it is with the banks.
	It was Goldman Sachs that was talking.
	It was a Goldman Sachs analyst that was talking about this to the financial press.
	And so it was covered by MarketWatch and Bloomberg and all these other places.
	But it really wasn't picked up.
	By people who are talking about the vaccine stuff that much.
	I mean, I talked about it, but I don't know anybody else who was talking about it at the time.
	Which really surprised me, because I thought, this is really a smoking gun.
	They're acknowledging publicly what we've always said about them and what Dr.
	Vernon Coleman was saying.
	They'll lie, they'll cheat, they'll steal.
	They don't want you to get well.
	They're not looking for cures.
	They want to keep you as an ongoing patient.
	They want to manage this, but not cure it.
	And then hopefully, as you're taking this medicine, it'll start to create some new conditions that they can also give you some more medication for.
	And I've seen that over and over again with older people, my parents' generation.
	Now I'm seeing it with my generation.
	Somebody starts taking a drug for a particular condition.
	Now all of a sudden, you know, they got so many pills, they got to get a special box to remember when, you know, have I taken this one today?
	I can't even remember it.
	Little or no advice is given to patients about how they themselves might reduce the risk of their cancer returning, says Dr.
	Coleman. The implication is that it's chemotherapy or nothing.
	So, for example, doctors are unlikely to tell breast cancer patients that they should avoid dairy foods, although the evidence that they should is very strong.
	And so he says, how many women with breast cancer realize that their survival chances might be better...
	If they took daily aspirin and avoided dairy products than if they accepted chemotherapy.
	Well, that would be informed consent.
	We don't want that.
	That would get in the way of our profits.
	Doctors don't tell them that because they have, as a profession, been bought by the pharmaceutical industry.
	He's absolutely right about that.
	As a matter of fact, let me just...
	I didn't write down the name of the thing.
	I'll have to bring it back, but it was, you know, just recently, I mentioned it briefly on the program.
	I was having some heart arrhythmia, and so they had me wear a monitor for a while, and they said I got AFib.
	So they said, well, you know, when your heart gets into this, you know, AFib mode, and it feels really weird, it feels like it's flopping around, and So, they said, when that happens, it has a propensity to create blood clots, so you're at risk for stroke.
	So, we've got a drug here for you.
	It's like, no, I know about these blood thinners.
	My dad was on warfarin, and I know about that.
	I'm like, oh, no, this is much better than warfarin.
	This is something new.
	If I remember the name of the drug, it was Eliquis or something like that.
	But it's made by Pfizer.
	I saw that, and it's like, oh, wait a minute, wait a minute.
	Let me look this up.
	And just like this, you know, the best case they can make is maybe 1% or 2%, you know, and the statistical noise that you get better.
	And, of course, you don't see this when you look up side effects.
	Unless you look at the comments and people start telling you what happened to them and what happened to their family.
	Horror stories about that stuff.
	It's like, no, I'm not telling you.
	Oh, and then the other thing about it was how expensive it was.
	Incredibly expensive. So, again, Pfizer.
	Exactly what you would expect.
	A drug that has no efficacy.
	That is extremely low in safety.
	And costs a fortune.
	And they get all the doctors and everything.
	That's their new standard of care.
	And they come out with this after somebody knows about a drug that's been out for a while.
	And word gets out.
	Stay away from warfarin. After word gets out about that, oh, no, that's the old stuff.
	We've got a brand new drug, which may be even worse.
	But they don't have the word of mouth has not gotten out about that, of course.
	And the FDA does not do anything to test anything, of course.
	So they run that scam over and over again.
	But I had someone tell me about a natural thing that a lot of people have started to take because they're concerned about the blood issues with these jabs.
	And I thought I wrote it down, but I don't see it here.
	And I wanted to give you that name, so I'll look it up and I'll give it to you.
	But that is actually something that's based on Eastern medicine, Chinese medicine.
	They would ground up earthworms.
	They didn't know what the active ingredients were, but they could see that it was very effective for certain things.
	And so they had some scientists who...
	Analyze it and they isolated a particular substance in the earthworms that's unique to them.
	And that's what they have with this.
	And it's got a good safety profile and it has a better efficacy than this other stuff.
	So that's what I'm taking.
	I meant to write it down to give you the name of it, but I forgot.
	So there are things that are out there.
	But it's important to take a look to try to find them.
	On Rockfin, Eric, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that. Thank you.
	And on Rumble, Freegan says, Doctors are pure filth.
	My GP, 15 years discontinued service because I refused to jab.
	Took me a year to find a new one who says get jabbed or get out.
	Doctors are blocking my access to health care, coercing me with their poison kill shots.
	Scum of the earth. Yeah, that seems to have taken over the profession because they kick the good people out.
	It's kind of like the military as well.
	They're kicking all the good people out of the institutions.
	That's why we need to form our new institutions.
	I know that there are a lot of good doctors and nurses who refuse to take the jab, who refuse to give it to other people.
	They're now out of the hospital system as well.
	The problem is in terms of trying to organize them into a system where you can provide health care.
	So we're going to take a quick break, and then we'll be right back.
	So stay with us.
	♪♪♪
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	show.
	you.
	Interested in a curated list of the finest classical music?
	Find it now at APSradio.com.
	All right.
	Stunning admission.
	Widely used.
	HPV vaccine is linked to four, four different autoimmune disorders.
	A study comparing nearly two million vaccinated and unvaccinated adolescent girls over a 10-year period.
	Found that the girls that were vaccinated with a HPV vaccine, a quadrivalent HPV vaccine, were 4.4 times more likely than unvaccinated counterparts to develop rheumatoid arthritis.
	Who would have thought?
	Yet another immune disease.
	And remember, it was a Republican governor, Texas governor, Rick Perry.
	Who more than a decade ago, it's probably about 15 years now, as Texas governor, he tried to mandate HPV vaccines for Texas school kids.
	You know, just like Trump. Gotta get the shots really going around and all the rest of the stuff.
	Yeah, let's make everybody take it.
	And that was a first.
	We'd never had anybody, not in any Democrat state even, It suggests that everyone needs to get something like that in order to be able to go to school.
	It was an outrage. And people pushed back on it.
	Remember, they sold it to you as a Republican.
	We had the vaccine industry in 1986.
	Fauci used Reagan to get the immunity for childhood vaccines, legal immunity for the pharmaceutical companies.
	He pushed to get that through with George W. Bush as all part of the 9-11 Homeland Security Patriot Act fraud.
	They began the simulations actually even two months before 9-11.
	But he also put out the PrEP Act, giving the vaccine companies legal immunity, as we've seen even worse than the 1986 Act, worse from the standpoint of people who've been injured by these greedy killers.
	And then go to Rick Perry right after that and try to get him to start the ball rolling.
	And then we had Trump, who supposedly was a vaccine skeptic.
	Oh, they've got to get the MMR shot.
	It's really going around, really bad.
	By the way, when he was doing that, it was a former aide of his, a former aide of Rick Perry, had gone to work for Merck, who was pushing the HPV vaccine.
	And they were not the only ones.
	GSK, GlaxoSmithKline, also had an HPV vaccine.
	That was developed by Monsef Slaoui.
	Does that name sound familiar to you?
	That was the guy that was working right underneath Fauci.
	Fauci was in charge of Operation Warp Speed.
	Fauci had always been working with Monsef Slaoui.
	The two of them were very, very close.
	And so before Monsef Slaoui went to Moderna, he was a GlaxoSmithKline, head of vaccinations and vaccines and that type of thing.
	And Ian Fauci were very close.
	The two of them had come up together with a vaccine for one of these other flu variants that they said was horrendous.
	That was pandemics.
	They proved in Scandinavian countries after about a year, they said it's causing narcolepsy, catalepsy in kids.
	They took it off the market.
	That was Fauci and Monsef Slaoui.
	That was one who was at GSK. But he also had an HPV vaccine that was there.
	So all these people pushing this stuff, same stuff.
	The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, of course, UNICEF, World Bank, they all kicked in nearly $600 million to expand global vaccination, screening, and treatment in multiple countries.
	Including in Central and South America.
	You know, it's always the usual suspects doing this kind of stuff.
	They were also behind all this HPV things.
	Japan is waking up to this stuff.
	Japan already threw away, they had a couple of different batches.
	The first one was 1.2 million.
	I think the second batch was a million.
	They started seeing black stuff in these vials.
	Spell it V-I-L-E-S. And they said it interacted with magnets.
	And what's that? What is it?
	You know, when you got your vaccine there and it, you know, I guess it wasn't frozen enough or whatever.
	And they start getting these black particulates that start forming that interact with magnets.
	And so the Japanese just threw away twice.
	They threw away over a million of these jabs.
	Now they're saying, we need to suspend mRNA vaccines.
	Now it's not everybody. The government has not made this official yet, but there's a lot of people calling for this in Japan.
	Saying we need to suspend the mRNA vaccines because they're contaminating our blood banks.
	People who need transfusions and that type of thing.
	It was also the Japanese who noticed the biodistribution of this mRNA stuff was concentrating in certain areas of the body.
	Of course, it concentrates in the spleen because that's the job of the spleen is to take stuff out.
	But after that, it's in reproductive organs the most.
	And so they wrote papers about that.
	And then when that was reported by a Canadian doctor, they kicked him out.
	That's where the real corruption is.
	It's in these organizations, the hospitals that are beholden to the government, and the medical associations that are beholden to the government, and are their handmaids.
	Receiving blood transfusions from a trump-shot vaccinated individual could pose a medical risk to unvaccinated recipients, such as numerous adverse events are being reported among vaccinated people around the world, according to a recent study from Japan.
	Many nations have reported that mRNA vaccine usage has resulted in post-vaccination thrombosis and subsequent cardiovascular damage.
	In addition, a variety of adverse events resulting from genetic vaccines now being reported worldwide.
	This includes a wide range of diseases related to blood and blood vessels.
	Here's why I wrote that down.
	Here's the mystery thing that I was talking about before.
	The secret ingredient from ground earthworms here.
	Don't worry, they've isolated it and all this, so you're not actually taking the earthworms.
	But, you know, it is kind of interesting.
	When you look at Chinese medicine, they have a different way of doing some things.
	Our daughter had been diagnosed at birth.
	She had hydroencephalus, which is water on the brain.
	It was swollen up really big.
	They thought that it might have affected her in an adverse way, so they did not put her up for adoption.
	And we were wondering what happened.
	Had they put a stent in? Because in the United States, they put a stent in.
	And then that creates another kind of a problem.
	Especially when you get to adolescence and the child starts to grow very rapidly, that stent becomes a big issue to try to take the water out.
	Well, in China, what they did was to get the water out, they gave her a particular drug or substance or something like that.
	It was an antidiuretic, and it purged out the extra liquid.
	And so, anyway, but here's the thing that I keep talking around.
	It's... L-U-M-B-R-O-K-I-N-A-S-E. L-U-M-B-R-O-K-I-N-A-S-E. I don't trust my pronunciation.
	But anyway, that's a natural alternative to the blood clot stuff, so you don't have to get the incredibly expensive, dangerous, and ineffective Pfizer equivalent.
	Speaking of that, the FDA has settled their ivermectin case.
	Remember, they put the stuff up.
	Just stop it, y'all.
	This is horse medication.
	Well, of course, what they were sending you was horse excrement, was what they were selling you, bovine excrement as well.
	So that's what we need to stop, folks, is the FDA. The FDA is what needs to be stopped.
	The FDA had already removed a page that said, should I take ivermectin to prevent or to treat COVID-19?
	No. So they removed that page.
	But now within 21 days, because of a lawsuit from several doctors, within 21 days, the FDA will remove another page titled, Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or to Prevent COVID-19, or other respiratory illnesses, frankly. And they also removed their tweet, You're not a horse, you're not a cow, seriously, y'all stop it.
	Well, here's the thing. The FDA is not a regulator.
	They're not concerned about safety.
	They're not concerned about efficacy.
	Seriously, y'all in Congress, stop the FDA. Stop them.
	They don't do anything.
	They're anti-safety.
	It's ridiculous. I'll show you one of the ridiculous things that's been in place for about 40 years that they just decided they would get rid of in a moment here.
	That had absolutely nothing to do with safety.
	They must have... Been coming after one particular company.
	Must have got somebody in the FDA really mad.
	Anyway, the FDA loses its war on ivermectin and agrees to remove all social media posts and consumer directives regarding ivermectin and COVID, including its most popular tweet in FDA history.
	That was put out by Dr.
	Mary Talley Bowden.
	One of the doctors who sued them, an honest doctor who has taken a lot of hits over this stuff.
	A lot of hits. This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship.
	And this is what this is all about.
	The FDA is not there to tell doctors what they can or cannot do.
	As a matter of fact, as they point out, this is off-label use.
	Which is very common. The FDA approved this for a particular parasite.
	But we've had, you know, it's not uncommon.
	It's very common practice, as a matter of fact, to have something that is FDA approved because part of that approval, that approval has two parts.
	It has safety and it has efficacy.
	And so the safety profile is well understood.
	It's been used for several decades.
	The question is whether or not it is effective for what you're using it off-label for.
	But doctors have always done off-label prescriptions.
	Because if it's safe, why not try it?
	You know, if people know what the safety profile is, if it's reasonably safe, we'll give it a try and see if it works.
	And that was all that was happening here.
	But it showed the MacGuffin.
	You have to have one solution.
	Because that one solution was what this whole political exercise is really about.
	The FDA interfered in the practice of medicine with their irresponsible language and posts about ivermectin.
	We will never know how many lives were affected because patients were denied access to a life-saving treatment because their doctor was, quote, just following the FDA. An FDA spokesperson said the FDA has not admitted any violation of law or any wrongdoing.
	The FDA disagrees with the plaintiff's allegations that the agency exceeded its authority by issuing statements challenged in the lawsuit, and it stands by its authority to communicate with the public regardless of the product that it regulates.
	But the reason they're doing this, folks, is because they don't want to have trial.
	A trial with evidence would show that they knew.
	A trial with evidence would show their emails going back and forth, the fraud that was involved.
	And a trial would show, as we have shown here on this show for years, What really happened when ivermectin was used versus their jabs?
	You use their jabs, you kill people.
	You use ivermectin, people with respiratory diseases got healed.
	And they don't want that.
	That would all come out in a trial.
	So they can just say, all right, we'll take the stuff down.
	We don't want to have a trial. Forget about it.
	Ivermectin was approved by the FDA in 1996.
	To treat several conditions, including a tropical disease caused by parasitic worm.
	And so, they said in the U.S., it's very common for doctors to prescribe medicine off-label, as I just said.
	They didn't want people to know this works better.
	They didn't want them to know that it's safer.
	And they certainly didn't want them to know that it was much, much cheaper.
	Because this is all about money.
	This is about killing people for money.
	And it's about intruding into the doctor-patient relationship.
	It's not about them actually doing any due diligence about safety or any of the rest of this stuff.
	They don't do that. But yet, after 20 years, they have finally deregulated frozen cherry pie.
	This is from Reason Magazine.
	This is a hoot.
	They regulated very strictly frozen cherry pie.
	Not any other kind of pie, not apple pie.
	And not unfrozen apple, not unfrozen cherry pie, but frozen cherry pie.
	That's why I say they must have had some kind of an axe to grind.
	Somebody in the FDA had an axe to grind with somebody who was making frozen cherry pie.
	I don't know.
	Mrs. Smith, is she still around anymore?
	20 years of lobbying.
	They implemented, actually, the frozen cherry pies regulations were actually implemented in 1971.
	I don't know why they say 20 years.
	I guess 20 years people have been fighting this, but this stuff has been around for 53 years.
	So they mandated how many cherries needed to be in a frozen cherry pie.
	25% by weight.
	And how blemished these cherries were permitted to be.
	Only 15% of them were allowed to be blemished in order to be in these pies.
	Reason said what made these regulations even more unusual, even taking into account the reams of FDA regulations that exist, is that these regulations applied only to cherry pies, and specifically only to frozen cherry pies.
	Fresh cherry pies did not have to meet these standards.
	Frozen apple pies did not have to meet these standards.
	Only these pies did.
	And again, like I said, I had a bad day with somebody that made frozen cherry pies.
	Vindictive, useless, dangerous agency, the FDA. Were they talking about food or about drugs?
	And of course, the two things are related, right?
	Let your food be your medicine, but not in this way.
	Chick-fil-A is going to start allowing antibiotics in his chicken, so you don't want that kind of medicine in your food, right?
	As a matter of fact, when I talked to Senator Nicely here in Tennessee, I never knew about the arsenic stuff going into chickens.
	He's a farmer, and he was freaked out when he found out about it.
	But he can't get it.
	The big chicken producing companies own the legislators.
	And he's put in a couple of bills to try to stop this, and they get shut down.
	And they try to intimidate him as well.
	They stop doing that.
	They don't want people to know they're putting arsenic in.
	Why do they put arsenic in chickens?
	Well, it makes the chickens gain weight.
	They gain weight. If they kept doing it long enough, the arsenic would kill the chickens.
	But they kill the chickens before the arsenic does.
	But meanwhile, it makes them put on a lot of weight.
	And then you eat the chicken and you eat the arsenic.
	And Senator nicely said, I won't eat chicken from a restaurant anywhere anymore.
	But then there's also the antibiotics.
	And now Chick-fil-A says they're going to allow the antibiotics as well.
	So the...
	On Rock Fan, Gregory, thank you very much for the tip.
	Appreciate it. It says, keep on spreading the truth until the sleepers are awake and alert.
	Well, we'll try. Sometimes I feel like I'm talking to dead men.
	Just all the stuff that we know about all this.
	It just keeps coming back around and people pretend that it doesn't exist.
	People haven't heard it. They don't listen to it.
	I see people hurt by these vaccines, hurt by the lockdowns.
	I've got a story here of a woman who is still, four years later, still wearing a mask.
	And she hasn't seen her grandkids in four years.
	And she said about them, they're little germ monsters.
	I said at the very beginning of this, when everybody was so paranoid, they're washing their hands everywhere.
	They're afraid to touch a hose to fill up their car with gasoline or whatever.
	Somebody else before me might have touched this and all the rest of the stuff.
	I said, we've turned into an OCD America.
	And it was all over the world.
	That is the power of propaganda.
	But the important thing is how powerful the truth is.
	Just one little bit of truth.
	When people see the truth, even though they're shouting the propaganda on a loop with a megaphone and all these other channels, if you see the truth, for some people it's going to resonate.
	We'll be right back. Elvis.
	Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles.
	And the sweet sounds of Motown.
	Find them on the oldies channel at APS radio.com.
	I'm going to be doing a video on the oldies channel.
	I mentioned this briefly on Friday, the very fact that Peter Navarro went to prison, and the same day that he reported prison, We're not showing up for a subpoena to Congress.
	Hunter Biden doesn't show up for a subpoena to Congress.
	He walks. This is what is getting people activated.
	It isn't over principle.
	It's over persecution that people are being activated.
	And as I said, when you look at what Peter Navarro is going to prison for, he should be going to jail for life.
	For ventilators. For killing people with ventilators and the rest of the stuff that he did as part of this lockdown crew of President Trump.
	The entire Trump administration from 2020 ought to go to jail for the rest of their lives.
	And the same thing is true of the Biden people.
	But we get caught up on these side issues.
	You're going to send them to jail because they don't obey a subpoena from Congress?
	I don't care about that.
	Do you care about that? And of course, it is this dual system, the fact that they ignore it, it gets everybody so angry.
	What we should be focused on are things like this.
	Trump floating a national ban on abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy.
	And as one person talked about it, said, trying to nail Trump on an issue, trying to figure out where he is on an issue, It's like trying to nail Jell-O to a wall.
	Because he'll never give you a straight answer about anything.
	And of course, nobody knows if he's got any principles or not.
	Except, we kind of do know what his principles are.
	Because his lawyer told us.
	I thought about it over the weekend.
	We don't know what's going to happen today.
	Because today is the deadline of Letitia James supposedly going to move to take some of his property.
	She made some preparations about that in the past.
	And I talked about this as a lawyer.
	Alina Hava had boasted.
	I wonder where she'd get this idea.
	She boasted that Trump had the money.
	And then Trump told her he didn't have the money.
	So he sent Alina in to go before the judges and appeal courts and say, it's impossible to get this kind of money.
	And look, I'm not supporting what this case is.
	Again, nobody was defrauded.
	And it's absolute total, no crime, but they want a half a billion dollars.
	I get that part of it.
	But look at the other side of it, okay?
	So the Republicans will focus on that.
	There's no crime. It's all political persecution.
	Yes, they're right about that. The Democrats will focus on the aspect that, you know, look at what a boasting fraud Trump is.
	And they're right about that, of course, as well.
	And that's a real character issue that we should be concerned about.
	But after having her go out and boast that, you know, they messed with the wrong guy.
	He's got plenty of this money. Then he has her going around on appeal to these judges, trying to appeal the judgment, saying, I don't have it.
	And then, over the weekend...
	He says, thanks to hard work and skill and luck, I happen to have a half a billion dollars in cash.
	I can pay this stuff. They thought they had me, that type of thing.
	It's like, what? And as people were looking at this, one analyst said, well, Lucy, you're going to have some explaining to do.
	You're going to have to go that she, Alina Habba, is going to have to go to the judge who's going to ask her about this.
	So were you lying to me about this?
	I mean, somebody here is lying, okay?
	And who are the lies coming from?
	And they're being told to the court.
	Now, they're not happy about, not going to be happy about that type of thing.
	But then, again, the question is, does he really have the money?
	Who knows? And see, that comes back to the essence of this case, which is not something that he ought to be, it shouldn't be a criminal offense, but people should be offended by somebody who has No character or integrity and is going to lie to them one way or the other.
	I wouldn't want to do business with Donald Trump and I certainly don't want to have him as president because of his lack of integrity.
	And so the interesting thing about all this is that they brought him up for charges saying that he was a habitual liar and constantly misrepresented his financial status, and here he is verifying all that.
	That is a stupidity that goes beyond what the lawyers were saying, because the lawyers were saying, wait a minute, geez, you're going to have to explain whether he has the money or doesn't because he's...
	But this now validates...
	The essence of that trial, and again, I'm not saying it's justified to make that a crime.
	He didn't defraud anybody.
	He paid everybody everything that they wanted to be paid.
	But it does define him and define his character, doesn't it?
	So we'll see what happens today.
	Now, some people are saying they don't have a constitutional case.
	It's going to be very difficult for her to repossess those properties.
	Because they're encumbered by loans and by other things like that, so it isn't just, oh, well, I'm just going to go in and change the locks.
	Maybe he could do the squatter thing.
	He's got a big family. He'd go around and squat on all these properties.
	He can't evict me. I mean, I wouldn't put it past him, quite frankly.
	You put Melania in one, and Barron in another one, and Eric, and anyway, but it's not going to be a simple thing.
	Neither of these things is probably going to happen today, but it'll be interesting to see what happens, and we'll talk about this as it develops.
	But the key thing is you can't nail him to the wall on any political principles either.
	You can't nail him to the wall on something as objective as his bank account.
	He'll lie about that.
	He gloated, I was able to kill Roe v.
	Wade a year ago.
	He said that. Without me, there would be no 6 weeks, 10 weeks, 15 weeks, or whatever is finally agreed to.
	Without me, the pro-life movement would have just kept losing.
	Thank you, President Trump, he writes to himself.
	And he puts Trump in all uppercase.
	The screaming ego of Trump.
	Very much like Kanye West was not talking about last week.
	This satanic ego.
	Me, me, me, me, me. I, I, I. I am the greatest, right?
	And so, after positioning himself as an anti-abortion champion, Trump shifted four months later to talk about bringing a national consensus.
	I think both sides are going to like me.
	Last month, word leaked that he would seek a national ban.
	His campaign called the New York Times report fake news.
	But then, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, an ally to the former president, a politician who, just like Pfizer, is willing to kill people for, you know, these politicians are willing to kill babies.
	They're willing to rip them apart for their political good.
	Lindsey Graham said, Trump is warming up to 16 weeks.
	On Tuesday, Trump mentioned 15 weeks in an interview.
	His ping-ponging on abortion is just one instance of how the former president has articulated a decisive stance on a critical political issue.
	He won't even stake a decisive position on his bank balance.
	But, of course, that's really smart.
	People say, oh, that's good. It's good to be a liar, a schemer, a man of no integrity.
	That's good. And that's the dangerous thing about this.
	That's why I talk about it. Look, we don't have a good choice for president.
	We didn't have a good choice even when the primaries were going.
	With a bigger field, we didn't have a good choice.
	And you can't really have any influence as to what happens with the president.
	They're completely owned people.
	We've seen that over and over again.
	We saw that in Trump's first term.
	So it's not about getting a good president in there to fix it.
	It's about getting people to wake up to the fact we've got to stop thinking inside that box they put us in.
	They put us in this presidential election ballot box.
	And we've got to get out of that box with our thinking and think about how we are going to short-circuit these plans, which are the same for both the Democrats and Republicans on the key existential issues.
	And we've got to think about how we're going to work around that, work against that, Instead of thinking, well, if we could just get a guy in there who would do everything he says and do all the things that I think need to be done, then we could win this thing.
	Well, how long would that last if they were to even happen?
	You know, one term, maybe?
	Of course, somebody like that would not be allowed to finish a term.
	They'd be finished by the CIA. But we need to think outside of that.
	And when you look at what is happening with Trump and this back and forth about whether he has the money or he doesn't have the money and boasting about that and boasting about how he saved abortion and then trying to throw it to the side.
	It's an albatross around our neck type of thing.
	He had a former lawyer who knows him pretty well.
	Alina Haba is starting to know him by this point in time, I think.
	And Ty Cobb said he's a deeply wounded narcissist, incapable of acting, except out of his own perceived self-interest or out of revenge.
	And so when you see him making these boasting stupid statements in the middle of a legal process, subverting the arguments that his lawyers are making at exactly that same time, What you're seeing here is somebody who is a deeply wounded narcissist, capable of acting, except out of his own perceived self-interest, and his perceived self-interest can be wrong, because he's blinded by his narcissism to what his real self-interest is.
	The narcissism is changing what he perceives to be his self-interest.
	But the revenge is always there.
	And as I say, what do we say about somebody who is willing to negotiate to which number of weeks or what age we're going to chop babies up, take living babies and rip them to pieces for his own political purposes?
	You think somebody like that might give us all a poisonous jab?
	Yeah, yeah.
	If he'll rip babies apart to please voters or political constituency or the press or to have people say nice things about him, he'll kill you too.
	This is not even a projection.
	We've lived through this, and yet people won't accept that.
	Even after the presidential primary, voters have little visibility on Trump's specific agendas on abortion, on the Israel-Gaza war, on Ukraine, on Social Security, among other issues.
	And by the way, if he does take a position on any of these things, he'll immediately hedge his bets with something that's completely different.
	Oh, it's 4-D chess.
	No, he's just a lying, pivoting person without any principles.
	It's not clever. It's not good.
	It's not leadership. This is a lack of character and integrity.
	You can't trust him.
	To keep a position, even when he nails it down.
	Build the wall. Okay, right.
	We saw this with Trump.
	I mean, not with Trump, but with Bush.
	George H.W. Bush.
	Remember, he had run against Ronald Reagan.
	He said cutting taxes is voodoo economics.
	As everybody figured, when he ran for president, after two terms as vice president, that he would raise taxes.
	So he wanted to assure everybody he wasn't going to raise taxes.
	Read my lips.
	No new taxes. Everybody that was alive remembers that pledge.
	And then when he became president, he was pushing the biggest tax increase we had ever had.
	And Rush Limbaugh came out against him.
	Rush Limbaugh even had a little comedy skit for radio where they have a George H.W. Bush impersonator.
	And he... You hear him running with the footsteps and then going up to the top of the White House to see which way the weather vane is turning and coming down.
	Oh, it was devastating satire.
	And so George H.W. Bush invited Rush Limbaugh to the White House, met him at the door, carried his bags in.
	He slept in the Lincoln bedroom.
	He came back the following Monday and said, this is great.
	And he never criticized him again.
	It was almost like they did a brain transplant on him.
	What they did was they removed his spine, I think, is what they did.
	Yeah, right there from no longer occasional cortex.
	No cortex at all, really.
	Half of the brain was tied behind the back and they removed his spine as well.
	But he just became a Republican shill after that point.
	Prior to that, he had been independent, you know, and he would criticize his stuff.
	So you're not going to see any real solutions to any of these issues.
	If he gives you a real solution, he's not going to stick to it.
	Like I said about medical stuff the first time around, Obamacare was a big issue.
	They had a policy paper that was excellent.
	It had a dozen different points.
	It was about giving people the ability to have choice, giving them the purchasing power to have choice, restructuring our system to make it more accountable, all the rest of the stuff.
	Trump never mentioned that.
	It was up on his website.
	As soon as he won, they took that down.
	He never said anything about it.
	He never did anything about Obamacare.
	He never did anything about the border either.
	The only thing he did about the border was when he locked it down with COVID. That's the only thing he ever did.
	So Trump tells Ramaswamy no for VP. He leaves the cabinet door open.
	This is a medicine cabinet so Ramaswamy, the pharmaceutical guy, can get some stuff out or put some stuff in.
	I don't know. Well, Ramaswamy had already said no to cash for Trump, but Trump...
	He does not fund his runs for office either.
	2016, 2020, he didn't fund it.
	He waited for the little guys to do it.
	And that's what Ramaswamy said in that interview.
	I played it for you, that clip, when it happened.
	He said, well, he needs the money of the little people out there.
	All of you little people, write checks to this guy.
	So they might put him in as Homeland Security.
	And, you know, Ramaswamy does have some experience with this.
	He was part of the Republican Lockdown Committee under Governor DeWine in Ohio.
	And DeWine was one of the worst governors ever.
	During that period of time.
	And Ramaswamy got in.
	He pitched a surveillance and tracking program that he wanted to run.
	So yeah, he'd be the guy for Homeland Security, I guess, because it's all about surveilling and tracking us.
	Homeland Security is not to keep the Homeland secure.
	We're going to leave the border open.
	We're going to get involved in foreign wars everywhere.
	But we want to make sure that everybody that lives here, all Americans are under constant surveillance.
	So yeah, Ramaswamy would be your guy for that.
	Maybe he even gave the idea of the million-dollar lottery to DeWine.
	I don't know where that came from.
	That was a pretty insidious thing.
	And, of course, it really was a lottery.
	Depending on which lot of vaccine you got, it would vary anywhere from 3 to 100.
	I think the units were micrograms, and I don't recall exactly.
	But it varied from 3 to 100.
	It varied by a factor of 33.
	So some people got a dosage that was 33 times more than other people did because, see, this is a big experiment.
	And everybody who took it was a lab rat.
	And one of the things that you would do if you were testing the drug, which they skipped, that's what Trump is so proud of, skipping the testing.
	If you were actually to do a test, you would be testing to see what dosage, assuming that it worked, assuming that it was safe.
	You'd want to know, too little dosage and it doesn't work, too much dosage and anything becomes dangerous.
	So, anyway, he may not pay the bond.
	He may just instead let her try to seize it, because it's going to be encumbered with all kinds of red tape.
	There's going to be appeals that they can make on that aspect of it.
	We're not going to see a resolution of this for quite some time, but we are going to see a lot of back-and-forth lies.
	We're going to see a lot of talk about being a victim, And how everybody needs to help him because he's under attack.
	We'll be right back. If you like the Eagles, the cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com.
	♪♪♪
	Show. On Rumble, Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip.
	He writes, is Chick-fil-A the flowers in the attic chicken company?
	I don't know that reference, flowers in the attic.
	Travis doesn't either, so give us another comment there, follow up.
	Definitely stay away from the cookies, he says.
	I don't know. But it does remind me of arsenic and old lace.
	Anyway, I also want to say thank you to people who have contributed on Zelle.
	I've let this list grow from the beginning of the month, and I just want to thank people.
	I won't do all of the list here, but I'll split it up into a couple of these.
	So here we are at about the midpoint.
	And so I want to thank a lot of these names we see over and over again.
	Very faithful contributors and supporters.
	Thank you so much.
	Let's see. Felicia H., Michael P., Sean S., Maurice W., Jeffrey C., Adam D., Brandon M., Kimberly M., and Benjamin P. And we'll leave it at that.
	There's a few more that we'll get to next time we come back in.
	But thank you so much for your support.
	And on Rumble, Freegan, thank you as well.
	For the tip, stay six feet apart.
	Limit gatherings to six people.
	Get jabbed and assume your position six feet under.
	Yeah, there's your 666.
	If ever there was one, right?
	On Rumble, KAFB. Thank you very much for the tip.
	And they thank me, but thank you for doing that.
	Let's talk a little bit more about...
	Character. And the importance of that, you know, I actually got a couple different people's take on character.
	We can't emphasize how important that is, to have character and leadership.
	But again, was anybody that we had in the race, Democrat or Republican?
	Would you label any of them as somebody of character?
	I wouldn't.
	And I'm not saying that somebody has to be perfect.
	But, you know, when they tell you one thing and do another, when they don't care about ripping babies apart and many other yardsticks of character that we could have, I think it's a very concerning thing.
	But it's also beyond even that with a lot of these people, like Trump, like Biden, for example.
	And I think the real issue is when we have people who hold them up as examples, who idolize them.
	That is the most dangerous thing to our society.
	It's one thing to have somebody that's there and you hold your nose and you vote for them as the lesser of two evils, but you acknowledge that they're evil.
	But when you hold them up as an idol, as a paragon, as a savior, as a messiah, which we are seeing this kind of language being used out there.
	When you do that, that is very damaging to our society.
	Very damaging. Self-patriot clarifies flowers in the attic.
	And flowers in the attic, the mother was poisoning the children with arsenic and sugar cookies.
	Okay, there we go. I didn't remember that one.
	Thank you. That's why he said stay away from the cookies.
	But when we look at how Christianity is being perceived right now, I think it's very important that For us to understand how we are being perceived.
	You know, we've got some churches that are a big church in North Carolina.
	It says, well, you know, for Easter, we're not going to use the term Jesus or Calvary or Resurrection or Blood or anything like that.
	We don't want to turn people off.
	You know what turns people off?
	Cheering for somebody who has obviously got ethical issues, integrity issues, and other things like that.
	But they will look at anything they can to try to pretend that we are a problem.
	They're accusing in Fresno, California, they're accusing an after-school Christian thing of luring kids in by offering them pizza.
	Isn't that interesting?
	We have these full-on groomers and pedophiles It's not Pizzagate for them to groom kids at school, is it?
	But if you just offer somebody pizza just as a hospitality thing, typically you've got people together, you're going to give them something to eat or drink.
	Oh, you're bribing them.
	Are they that easily bribed?
	But this is from a listener, Junk Food Science.
	And they have a website, junkfoodscience.weebly.com.
	And they have put in a very detailed expose about what's going on with the abortion pills.
	Discovering the truth of abortion pills is a comprehensive examination of the scientific evidence that the FDA has used in each of its approval and regulatory actions on the RU-486, the abortion pill.
	Mephistoprone or whatever, I just call it Mephistopheles.
	The project began after hearing of organized efforts to have research exposing the harms of abortion retracted and discredited, removed from medical research databases.
	This comprehensive review of the evidence uncovered that the FDA has never had any science to support its approval of RU486, the abortion pill, or any of its regulatory actions of the abortion pill to protect patient safety for the past quarter century.
	We're talking about women's health here.
	We're not talking about the baby.
	We're talking about protecting the health of women.
	What does this pill do to the women who take it?
	They don't care. If they're lucky, I guess, they figure they could kill the baby and the mother.
	They don't have to worry about it in the future.
	Stunningly, not a single study the FDA used has complied with long-standing federal requirements for scientific evidence.
	This paper uncovered a massive web of heavily funded vested interests, troubling agendas grounded on eugenics and population control.
	These organized and well-funded interests have concertedly worked to control public information, medical research, education, and public policies.
	Thank you.
	The paper concludes with an overview of what's at stake in this important case, which begins tomorrow.
	This case won't stop chemical abortions or abortions, surgical abortions, but it will step back the most dangerous of the FDA's scientifically unsupported actions from 2016 to date.
	actions that removed the safety protections for the young mothers, and allows the FDA to hide the adverse events and the risks from the public.
	This court case will be critical for any state or locality hoping to ban and eradicate abortions from their communities.
	Texans and other states with anti-abortion statutes wrongly believe that this case doesn't affect them.
	Since 2021, the FDA has also allowed mail-order and telehealth pill mills, many of them foreign, to bypass state regulations.
	Abortion pills are being mailed to every state in the country with no restrictions and no oversight for the safety of the young mothers.
	As we've talked about with this, one of the reasons that you would always have to have an exam is because this is not to be used beyond a certain stage, beyond a certain size.
	And that is going to vary, even if the mother knows exactly the age of the baby, which is not certain.
	It's the size that matters and that's why an exam is necessary.
	That's why it can have severe complications for a mother to abort a baby past a certain point.
	And that's why these pill mills, many of them foreign, as well as all this mail order abortion is so dangerous for women.
	These people who talk about this, they don't care any more about women's health than they do about choice.
	These are the same people who told you to wear a mask, stay locked inside, take your jab, all the rest of the stuff.
	They didn't care about your choice, your body, your choice.
	And they don't care about the bodies or the health of these women.
	They just want to kill babies.
	And if the mother goes, so be it.
	All the better, because they don't have to worry about her having any babies in the future.
	So I hope everyone will read this comprehensive scientific review.
	It's an overwhelming amount of information, but abortion is a life-changing, life-ending choice.
	This is from Sandy, and I'll tell you the website again is junkfoodscience.weebly.com.
	So you can go there and you can find that PDF. It's very extensive.
	So I wanted to address those, you know, what people had sent me.
	But again, from what we were talking about in the last segment, the characteristics of a good leader.
	You know, we are so conditioned by the Marxists who want to eradicate our history, eradicate our culture, our values and everything.
	They're going around tearing down statues, tearing down the reputations of men.
	And of course, we know. That George Washington, all this stuff, I cannot tell a lie, chop down the cherry tree.
	We know these are fables that were there.
	But we also know that everyone talked about George Washington's character.
	And George Washington wrote a great deal about the importance of virtue to him.
	Did he practice that perfectly?
	I'm sure he didn't.
	Nobody practices their principles perfectly, but it's what they aspire to, what values they communicate to the people that they lead and other things like that.
	Those are of paramount importance, even if that person may have some failures, because we all do have failures.
	Nevertheless, those values, that character, that integrity needs to be there.
	And a leader. And even secular organizations understand this.
	Even secular organizations understand this about getting a CEO or leader of an organization.
	Very, very important.
	How much more so when you have somebody in a position of power like the presidency?
	Power of life and death.
	Power of war and peace.
	Power of the purse.
	The power to lock us down and kill us with injections.
	Do you think you ought to have some character?
	Should we be concerned about that?
	Presidential politics is not a solution, but you need to view it as a control tactic.
	They want you in this presidential ballot box.
	They want your head in there.
	They want all your concern about the presidential ballot because you're not going to do anything to affect that.
	Nothing. Nothing.
	As I've said before, it's one of the reasons why with third-party politics, they would always force us to compete in the presidential race to retain ballot access.
	Because they knew we weren't going to be able to get a big enough, you know, 10% or whatever to retain ballot access.
	So we'd have to, you know, like Sisyphus, we would have to keep rolling the rock up the hill every four years, you know, to get ballot access.
	So... It was a way to misdirect people away from races where we could have actually had a chance to get somebody elected.
	But all of our resources went into presidential politics.
	That's why I say, when you do this and you understand that they control this presidential race from ballot access to debate access to how the votes are taken, how they're tabulated, how they're reported, there's fraud in every one of these steps.
	And of course, Trump added a whole new level with the vote-by-mail stuff.
	That was him. And so, you know, the presidential politics is not going to be a solution.
	You just need to understand that this is what they're doing to try to control us.
	And yet people jump into this.
	We see people out there saying, God gave us Trump.
	That's a quote from some of these people who identify themselves as evangelicals.
	They're really taking that term and dragging it through the mud.
	And it's not just the mainstream media that's doing it.
	It's the people who are saying this kind of stuff and using that kind of label for themselves.
	As George Barna said, I asked people, they self-identified as evangelicals.
	It's like, well, what do you believe?
	What do you do in your life? Do you read the Bible?
	Do you do any of this? No, no, no.
	Anybody can call themselves anything they want to.
	But there is a very special reason why they are vilifying that term.
	It used to mean people who were focused on spreading the good news.
	That's what evangelical means, right?
	It means it was like evangelical, like an angel would be a messenger or whatever.
	It was a good message. It was what it originally came from.
	Translated into English.
	Kind of transliterated, if you will.
	But this is from Reuters.
	This is really a battle between good and evil, said evangelical TV preacher.
	Hank Kuhnerman says of a slew of criminal charges facing Donald Trump.
	There's something on President Trump that the enemy fears, and it's called the anointing.
	And then putting out this idea that he's supernatural, that he's God's chosen.
	Yeah, God has chosen him in the sense that anybody that's there, good or bad, has been chosen by God.
	He doesn't play dice with the universe.
	Even Albert Einstein understood that.
	The question is, is it being chosen for blessing or for cursing?
	There's no intermediate position.
	It's either blessing or curse.
	So I guess it depends on your perspective, whether you think that being locked down, poison shots sent out everywhere, if you think that's a blessing or is that a curse?
	He would not be present if God did not want him to be present.
	I can guarantee you that.
	But that doesn't really mean anything for these people.
	And yet, to talk about things like this and the phrase of anointing and all the rest of this stuff that these people are doing, again, it is a game of thrones.
	And the game that these people are running is a game of audience.
	It's a grifting game.
	They're just trying to bankrupt him.
	They're trying to take everything that he's got.
	Where are these people when the poor people around them were having their cars and homes stolen with civil asset forfeiture?
	Where were they when the IRS went in and took everything from somebody and never gave them due process?
	No presumption of innocence, not even a trial.
	They just take everything. Then you've got to sue them to try to get your stuff back.
	This has been happening to everybody.
	Everybody. Everybody. And they don't care about a single person except for Trump.
	And nobody's talking about reforming any of those other things either.
	They care if Trump gets people walking through his house.
	But they don't care if a SWAT team uses flashbang grenades and throws them into a kid's crib.
	Do they? They care about that kind of stuff.
	No-knock SWAT team raids.
	Nah, we don't care. But you guys came in and arrested this politician.
	You put him in handcuffs. You had the TV people.
	That's reprehensible. Absolutely is reprehensible.
	But it's nothing compared to what they tolerate and ignore.
	It's been going on for 30, 40, 50 years of this war on drugs.
	It just keeps getting worse.
	They're trying to put him in prison.
	It said this guy, let's see, this is somebody who identifies himself as a prophet.
	Lance Walno.
	Where's Walno? I don't know.
	Where's Walno?
	Where's his prophecies?
	I bet he's another one of these Trump prophets like Julie Green, who has told us a stream of one lie after the other.
	These people are as bad as Al Gore, except Al Gore, Doesn't claim that God told him.
	He claims the scientists told him, and he treats the scientists as God.
	But these people are even worse in my book.
	Somebody who went on the Jim Baker show to say that.
	Oh, yeah, you can trust Jim Baker, too, right?
	I don't know. Maybe he's cleaned up his act.
	I don't know. But it was an act.
	It was an act. Maybe he's had a come-to-Jesus moment in prison.
	I don't know. Scary thing is that God and his sovereignty is looking to give us a leader.
	And he's going to give us a leader that befits us, I think.
	That's already in the books because it's going to be Trump or Biden.
	So, yeah, God has already got that taken care of.
	He's going to give us somebody that's a perfect reflection of us in many different ways.
	So, characteristics of a good leader.
	Twelve characteristics of a good leader.
	And this is really about just an organization.
	How do you get an organization to work well?
	For example, if you had Trump elected as president, how would he actually go about making the swamp better?
	How would he reform it?
	How would he reduce its size?
	How would he actually manage this stuff?
	Well, he would have to have character to get this to happen.
	We need good leaders to help guide us and to make essential decisions, right?
	And this is important at all levels.
	But think about what it does to us and to our children when we idolize bad men.
	Again, you know, we've got all these presidents who, you know, we find out later on they had these secret assignations or affairs or whatever you want, adultery.
	But they had the decency to hide it.
	Instead of flaunting it shamelessly like this guy.
	And I said this about Trump.
	I said, you know, the first person that's not part of LGBT that is proud of their sin, that parades it in public, that's Donald Trump.
	One of the first pride parades for heterosexuals, I guess.
	So if we idolize people who have no integrity, that is a big deal.
	So what are the 12 essential leadership qualities?
	Well, listen to these.
	I'll just run through and I won't elaborate on them, but just listen to this and see if you think that it applies to Trump.
	A self-awareness.
	Now, we're not talking about narcissism.
	Just are you aware of your flaws, of your humanity?
	Number two, respect.
	Respect for what? Respect for others?
	Respect for the Constitution? Yeah, respect, yeah.
	Compassion? Yeah.
	Vision? Yeah, vision.
	Do you have some idea of what it is that you actually want?
	For example, somebody sent me this.
	There's President Trump. It's a meme.
	Says, if I could save my election without allowing an abortion, I would do it.
	And if I could save it by allowing all abortions, I would do it.
	And if I could save it by allowing some, I would also do that.
	Okay, so, you know, that's what we're talking about with Trump.
	That's his vision. What is his vision?
	I don't know. Can he communicate it?
	Or do we get these mixed messages, this flip-flopping?
	Learning agility.
	Is he quick to pick up on things?
	Well, if they slight him, he's quick to pick up on it.
	Like McEnany, she didn't report one of his poll numbers.
	Remember how he went off on her?
	Oh, boy. Collaboration.
	Does he work well with others?
	Influence, integrity, courage, gratitude, resilience.
	Does that describe Donald Trump to you?
	How many of these does he have?
	You know, we all know that Biden doesn't have them either, right?
	I mean, that's not a...
	The key thing is, I talk about this not to elevate Biden, and that's the people who are caught up in this Trump thing.
	Well, who do you want for president?
	It's like, I don't want none of the above.
	But I'm just trying to get them to understand not to put all their hope in the office of presidency, because we have hopeless candidates there.
	This person said, I've seen so many great leaders ruin their opportunity because of a moral failing.
	Sometimes it has been a ruinous vice of committing moral indiscretions.
	Sometimes it's embezzling money or committing corrupt political practices.
	Millions of dollars, if you...
	Anyway, more often than not, however, it has been the lesser evils that simply undermine people's confidence in your work.
	But these guys, both Biden and Trump, pick these big ticket items, you know, they mark that off, millions in terms of payoff from people, whether it's Ukraine or pharmaceutical companies.
	Years ago, I was a dean working with a man who had an inability to control his temper.
	He would get angry with himself and his circumstances, and in the midst of anger, he would lash out on his social media network.
	No, this is somebody else.
	at those around him. In one telling scene he completely destroyed his opportunity when he blew up at his board of directors and said derogatory and destructive things about them that forever undermined their ability to trust him.
	Is this the perfect description of Trump?
	Bye.
	Virtually everybody who ever worked for this guy?
	Cannot stand him and opposes him.
	Many of them have even left the Republican Party.
	Many of them have even jumped in as Democrats to oppose him.
	These are the people who know him best.
	Shortly thereafter, he was fired from his position.
	He never worked again in this line of work.
	It wasn't a deadly vice that did him in, but it was the inability to exercise emotional intelligence that ruined his opportunity.
	Has Trump burned down a lot of bridges to a lot of things to actually get anything done?
	During this episode, I couldn't help but think about how each of us has an area of vulnerability that often prevents us from realizing our full potential.
	Don't just project this onto somebody else.
	Think about it in your own life as well.
	I've seen issues, you know, personality issues affect all of us, all of us.
	I've often seen young, promising executives derailed by the most pernicious character flaws.
	These events have had little to do with these executives' competence and everything to do with their lack of character.
	And the reason I mention this is not this holier-than-thou type of thing.
	Like I said, we all have these issues.
	But the question is, why are people elevating somebody who obviously has no integrity, no vision, no And no self-control or self-awareness.
	Can't control his temper.
	Does it in public over and over again.
	His MO, going back to his first wife, was to not just have a divorce, which is very common in our society, but it was to mock her, ruthlessly mock her, as he cheated on her and divorced her.
	Peter Drucker amplifies the importance of integrity by noting that the greatest test of our integrity and character is the way that we treat other people.
	How does Trump treat people?
	We've never ever, I mean, when he first began, and he started throwing smears and slander at people, and, you know, lies that he would tell about people as well.
	Everybody's like, whoa, whoa.
	But now, it isn't about that person at all.
	It really reflects now on Trump himself, because everybody sees the pattern of behavior.
	They know that he's just trying to hurt somebody that used to work for him.
	He has no loyalty to anyone, no loyalty to any principles.
	Peter Drucker says, management may forgive a man a great deal.
	Again, we're talking about just running the pragmatic aspects of running an organization.
	He says, And he goes on to emphasize that one's lack of integrity is so serious that if it is discovered, it should immediately disqualify one from a position of leadership.
	You see, if Trump wins...
	His lack of integrity...
	His personal character flaws we've seen displayed are going to keep him from getting anything accomplished, if he even really cares to get anything accomplished.
	His only accomplishment that he cares about is getting himself elected, getting his name up there on those buildings.
	He doesn't care if they go bankrupt.
	He doesn't care if he's got to sign a note for $675 million at 14% interest.
	He wants his name on those casinos that are there.
	Peter Drucker believed the moral tone for the entire organization starts at the top.
	And that's one of the things that the president does.
	These presidents, whether you're talking about Biden or Trump, set the moral tone for the nation.
	It's not George Washington's moral tone, is it?
	He believed that the behavior of your senior executives fundamentally sets the tone for your organization.
	He said, Moral failings are so catastrophic they undermine the very trust that is at the heart of leadership.
	So we should keep this in mind.
	And yet, because the system, we're talking about presidential elections, national elections in general, even state elections, especially the big offices like governor, the people are already chosen for you.
	You don't have a choice.
	It begins with ballot access.
	And by keeping that restricted, by putting the political parties in charge of that, they make sure that we don't have a choice that's going to have integrity.
	The importance of character and leadership when we talk about leadership development, the focus is often on people skills or communication skills, on vision or intelligence or business acumen, right?
	What has Trump pushed out?
	Well, I'm very intelligent.
	I've got real successful businesses.
	Look at how much money I've made and all the rest of the stuff.
	Look at how I can communicate with people.
	I'm a celebrity. And I've got this vision of a wall, even if he doesn't deliver that vision.
	But he doesn't deliver it because he's not a man of good character.
	And of course, it goes without saying, Biden and Hunter and Joe are not, there's no character there either.
	So what makes someone trustworthy?
	Well, this article has seven points here.
	Six. They do what they say they'll do.
	Know any politicians like that?
	Not at the national level, really.
	Thomas Massey, maybe.
	Their behavior is reliable because over time they've shown consistent behavior and responses to similar situations.
	They're truthful, deeply honest.
	They make well-considered choices by being open to counsel and perspectives of others.
	They're brave in what they always do is right, even when it is hard.
	They look out for the common good rather than just serving their own desires.
	This is what we need to be looking for in leaders.
	You don't have anybody like that running for president.
	You have probably nobody like that running for Congress in your area either.
	Maybe not as governor.
	So look elsewhere. Look for people like this at the local level.
	But always hold this up as a standard.
	Because if we lose this standard, then this is like Solzhenitsyn talking about living by lies.
	This is one of the biggest lies we can tell ourselves.
	That character doesn't matter.
	That integrity doesn't matter in our leadership.
	Oh, it does. That is a road to hell on earth if we reject the idea of integrity and character.
	And if there is no integrity or character on the ballot, then we have to look elsewhere for our solutions.
	Look outside of politics, or look locally at politics, or whatever you need to do, but understand that character and integrity is not on the menu for a president.
	This is a good example here.
	LifeSite News. Stories of truly virtuous women are essential to the raising of our daughters.
	You can't win a culture war if you don't have any culture.
	You can't win if you don't have a vision.
	A vision of beauty and of truth and of morality.
	I often think of this.
	Travis taught himself how to read by reading G.A. Henty books.
	We tried to...
	Get them started on phonics at an early age.
	And he really didn't like that.
	It was too much, you know, too dry and everything.
	So I said, well, let's just, I'll read to him a lot.
	And so I read to him a lot. He liked the stories my other son did too.
	But he grabbed, started out with Jay Hinty books.
	This is an author from The Victorian period in England, and he would write historical novels.
	And he would always have, as the protagonist, it'd be a young boy on the cusp of manhood, and he would usually have a girl that he was interested in as well.
	But he would be there as major historical events were happening.
	The first one we did was Jay Hinty's For the Temple.
	You'll see that all the homeschooling things, because it's about The destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD, the Roman emperor who's there, the Jewish leaders, and all this kind of stuff.
	And so you've got the character who is kind of there in the middle of all of that.
	And he's going back and forth, and he's having interactions with people on both sides.
	And that's the way G.A. Hinty tells the story of history.
	The story before the temple was taken mostly from Josephus' writings.
	And some of it quoted verbatim.
	No copyright on that, by the way.
	Even AI could go in and scan Josephus.
	It's about 2,000 years old, so copyright has expired, unless you get some knock on the door from some Roman censor trying to take it down.
	Anyway, but then there would also be this story.
	And what struck me as I read these stories to the kids was that even the bad guys in the story Had a lot of character and integrity.
	There were certain things that they would not do.
	They had a moral standard that they would not violate.
	We don't have that anywhere sold to us by Hollywood or the people who give us our stories or give our children the stories.
	The stories that they feed our children, even the protagonists, are getting progressively more evil and more demented and deranged.
	And they have no standards except whatever works, right?
	Anything you want to say about Jay Hendy?
	But it was a great series, and I was surprised because it's a pretty high vocabulary level, and Travis taught himself how to read using that, because he was really motivated.
	And every one of these stories was the same.
	And it was truly, that was the thing that stuck out to me the most, was how everybody, even the bad guys, the bad guys had more character and integrity than the good guys do in our modern stories.
	The only one I can remember where the bad guys were pretty much just despicably evil was the one about the Reign of Terror, where it was happening in France at the time.
	Oh, yeah. Yeah. But to be fair, Robespierre doesn't really show up much.
	He's just kind of off in the wings doing whatever it was Robespierre did.
	Yeah. Well, Jay, especially the people in Victorian England, they knew just how evil the French Revolution was, and they weren't cutting them any slack.
	That was pretty accurate, I think.
	My point being is that not that these people were not evil, but that Jay Hinty would not typically portray them as evil as they were.
	Because what he was trying to do was to sell the idea.
	Character was the most important thing for them to see.
	And he wanted them to see it even, to some degree, in the bad guys.
	Disney, on the other hand, has a very effective way to form the characters of children, especially girls, says LifeSite News, through their characters.
	And now they're even focusing on the villains.
	And you see that all through Hollywood.
	You know, Batman's not dark enough.
	We've got to have movies about the Joker.
	And so they point out little girls are attracted to goodness and beauty.
	But you know the same thing is true of boys as well.
	It isn't just a girl thing.
	As a matter of fact, we should, everybody wants to see that.
	We should be able to own entertainment because we have truth and beauty on our side.
	And we want to elevate those things.
	And people really do like things that are uplifting instead of this negative stuff.
	You even see it in Hollywood, for example.
	Hollywood had, and still does to some degree, they've interjected a lot of evil into their characters and other things like that, but they still, as dark as the movies are, they want to have them have a happy ending.
	Always want to have a Hollywood ending.
	And they will focus group test this stuff to see if it's got a happy ending.
	A good example of that was Brazil with Terry Gilliam.
	He did not have a happy ending.
	Studios were not happy.
	So they fought with him.
	They wouldn't release it. He released it, I think it was in LA, to some film critics and got them to review it as a way of getting around their embargo.
	They were saying, you're not going to release this unless you make these changes.
	And then they actually did put together a Love Conquers All version of Brazil, and they put that out as well.
	But... They want to have a happy ending.
	They've got a pacing. They've got a certain rhythm and a flow and a story arc that they pretty much do in every one of their movies because they know that people want to have a happy ending.
	Even if you've got something like Terminator, you want to have a hero who's going to come in there and save the day, and he's going to get rid of the AI robots that are destroying the Earth.
	Part of that is predictive programming, but part of that is the fact that people want to have a happy ending.
	So this news article here from Desiree News...
	Can I say something just slightly off topic, but recently a very famous mangaka died named Akira Toriyama.
	He's the guy who created Dragon Ball and Dragon Ball Z. And some people deride Dragon Ball as being a little simplistic, but I think one of the reasons it has such staying power and people love it so much is that the main character, Goku, just wants to do the right thing.
	He's truly just a hero.
	He just wants to protect everyone on Earth and all of his friends, and he just wants to get stronger to do that.
	Yeah, it's a simplistic premise, but he's a hero.
	He's not some questionable morally gray.
	I don't know if I'm doing... No, he's going to do the right thing.
	Yeah, yeah, that's right.
	And it's that simplistic kind of stuff.
	When I was reading comic books in preschool, you know, I mean, it was that...
	That's the way the comic books at that time were.
	It wasn't this complex, psychotic, conflicted person, you know, that is there all the time.
	We had really clear right and wrong.
	Kids want to have that.
	It gives them, they want those kinds of guidelines, but it's also good for society as well.
	And it's good for us as individuals.
	The Desiree News says, are religious people happier?
	They said the science is pretty clear.
	They've had a lot of double-blind studies on this, and it's not just happiness, really.
	What we understand, and I've talked about this before, happiness depends on what happens to you.
	It depends on your circumstances, and you may not be in good circumstances.
	Hopefully you are, but good circumstances don't typically last that long for us in this life.
	So it's having a joy and a peace when the circumstances are not good.
	That's why we talk about joy instead of happiness.
	But they talk about happiness.
	They ask people...
	If they were happy, if they were religious, or if they were non-religious, and are you happy?
	So that's something that is subjective, and yet, an Oxford University Press book summarized the research on the subject, for example, comes in at almost 900 pages, just listing the different studies on this.
	In the analysis, the Handbook of Religion and Health, 326 articles on the relationship between health and measures of religiosity and subjective well-being, happiness, or life satisfaction.
	They found 79% of those studies reported that religious people were happier.
	Only 1% of the studies showed they were less happy.
	Heavily skewed to that one direction.
	Finding a relationship between happiness and religiosity...
	It's so established that many research papers take it as a given starting point.
	So when you look at this, and it's not, again, we look at it as more of a relationship than it is things that we do.
	I mean, even when somebody's got a whole list of things that they need to do to appease God or whatever, they're still looking at that In a sense, as a relationship.
	And so, it really is, when we talk about peace, it really is about being contented with what you have.
	Having a confident expectation about what comes after life, what's next in life, or being grateful for what you have.
	We've seen studies showing that people who have a great deal of gratitude are happier.
	Because they're focusing on what's in the glass rather than what is not in the glass.
	And so, I think what is happening here is they're looking at people who have religious beliefs.
	They're not focused so much on what they feel like they need.
	You know, they're looking at something else.
	But even these mega churches now, and many other churches that are being run like a business, they're selling something.
	They're not really giving people peace.
	Peace with God, peace of mind, contentment with what they have.
	It is really surprising to look at this, let me pull this up here.
	This is a mega church in North Carolina.
	And this person is giving an interview, and she is head of digital media for this big church.
	This is a church that's got more than 25,000 members attending at multiple locations across the state.
	And so in this interview, the guy asked her, what are you going to do for Easter?
	I'd love to hear about, like, what are you specifically tackling for Easter right now?
	Like, okay, this is going to be a bigger service for most churches.
	What are some of the things that you have to get your, you know, ducks in a row, as it were, in respect to Easter?
	For us, the most important thing on Easter is inviting people to church.
	Easter and Christmas are the only two Sundays of the year that are actually wrapped around a particular passage in the Bible.
	Most of our other Sundays are whatever the pastor wants to preach on, any particular thing or whatever.
	But Easter and Christmas are both around particular biblical events.
	And so this particular biblical event of Easter is tied directly to our mission.
	And so that's so important to us.
	And so when I think about how I'm going to talk about Easter, I'm thinking about I'm not going to say any of these words that make someone feel like an outsider.
	This is really an important guiding principle for how we develop language, is anyone can be a part of our church.
	It might not be for everyone.
	Everyone might not like it, but anyone can come.
	You don't have to understand any fancy language.
	There's not any prerequisite to be able to come here.
	Well, yeah, there is a prerequisite, actually.
	It is Calvary, Christ, crucifixion, the resurrection.
	Those are the prerequisites for anything that a church does.
	Now, if you've got a business that you're marketing to people and you don't want to offend them, Well, that's a completely different thing.
	But there are some particulars there.
	How are they going to know any of this stuff unless somebody tells them?
	How will they believe unless they have been told?
	You're not going to tell them? You're going to run away from this stuff because you think somebody might be triggered or offended?
	This is what has happened.
	This is a good example, and I think this is really...
	An example of what meathead Rob Reiner is trying to do with his documentary on Christian nationalism.
	That's why I said, you know, when John MacArthur talks about Christian nationalism, he's thinking about theological arguments he's had with some of these people over eschatology or other things a couple of decades ago.
	That's not what's happening now.
	These people are trying to make us ashamed to talk about Jesus.
	And they're trying to make us ashamed of our religion and ashamed of the idea that there is such a thing as absolute truth.
	She's an example of that.
	And she hasn't even been criticized yet.
	You know, John MacArthur doesn't have a problem going on Larry King and saying, this is what I believe, end of story, you know.
	So I don't think he really even sees that.
	It's not anything that would ever really faze him.
	But he's not this digital communications person like that.
	And I think all of our beliefs really need to be about that.
	We need to think about what are the important things in life and what we believe about those things.
	And we need to be convinced enough that we're willing to stand on that.
	And if we don't, our society is headed down the tubes faster than you can imagine.
	And that's what we see right now.
	And we see it heading down the tubes because of that very attitude about everything.
	About everything. So she's there at a church called Elevation Church, pastored by Stephen Furtick, 25,000 people across North Carolina.
	She said it's vitally important that people feel super chill when they get an invitation to attend the church's Easter services.
	I mean, those are churches I go to.
	We don't even use the term Easter.
	We talk about Resurrection Sunday.
	She doesn't even want to use the term Resurrection.
	I think everybody pretty much knows what resurrection is.
	I mean, they've even used it over and over again in horror films, you know?
	Going back to the old Frankenstein movies, you know, the people go in and exhume the bodies so that the doctors could experiment on them and do autopsies and stuff like that and learn anatomy.
	They call them resurrectionists.
	I think everybody knows what that is about.
	Anyway, she said, how we talk to someone who is not steeped in that tradition?
	Well, here's how you talk to people.
	You declare what is true.
	The gospel is a declaration.
	It's not a debate.
	You say what's true, and if God has opened up somebody's heart and mind and ears and eyes to this, they'll understand that.
	Or they'll ask some more questions and absolutely answer questions.
	But any kind of terminology that is there that they don't understand, they can always ask.
	This person on Protestia says, Elevation Church seems to think the words like resurrection are dirty and offensive.
	What sort of marketing ploy?
	That's it, a marketing ploy.
	What kind of marketing ploy are they using to get people to attend services?
	You know, these people who do this kind of stuff, Think that the people they're communicating with aren't going to see them as condescending.
	They think that people are not going to see that this is a marketing ploy.
	But people see through all that.
	It's pretty transparent.
	So, here's one of the promotions that they put out for Easter.
	Hop on down to Elevation Church for a wicked Easter eggstravaganza.
	Pastor Steve will deliver a three-point sermon on why we shouldn't put all of our eggs in one basket, and he'll be wearing a Bugs Bunny costume.
	Plus, you'll get your bunny worship on with our Gen Z worship band.
	Runners up in the 2022 Regional American Idol Audition.
	Wow. Let's go for some amateur entertainment.
	You want to see a guy wearing a bunny costume?
	Okay. I wonder if it's that pink bunny costume that they had the kid in the Christmas story wearing, Ralphie.
	Or you go to the other extreme.
	This is also from the same church.
	It's Megadeth Sunday at Alvation Church.
	60 minutes of blood-curdling mayhem.
	The crucifixion set to heavy metal soundtrack.
	Performed on stage by our in-house thespians.
	Not that there's anything wrong with that, they said.
	Guaranteed to scare the hell out of you, a nursery is provided.
	So anyway, this protestia, I'm sorry, this is not protestia, this is Todd Starnes' comment.
	He says, an invitation to church doesn't have to be a theological dissertation or some sort of bait and switch.
	It also doesn't have to be sensational entertainment either.
	It's not what it's about. You know, we just are entertaining ourselves to death, aren't we?
	Can we not take anything seriously?
	No. Why not just be honest and upfront with people?
	Let them know what Easter is really about, why it's important for them to hear the message.
	I mean, at some point, says Todd Starnes, Elevation Church does present the gospel message to their unchurched visitors, right?
	At some point, non-Christians are told about the resurrection of Christ, right?
	I mean, we're not sure, actually.
	We're asking questions here.
	Does that really happen there?
	And at some point, the visitors are made aware that the blood of Jesus was the price that was paid for our sins, right?
	If not, Elevation Church Easter service is nothing more than a self-help sermon, accented with snazzy graphics and a so-so cover band.
	Yeah, it's like Joel Osteen.
	Worked for him. He's got an even bigger church.
	He's got over 30,000, last I looked.
	Maybe we should start calling this, we could have this be a category, we could call it Osteenism.
	Or maybe Paula White-ish.
	Yeah, though your sins be as scarlet, they can be white-ish, kind of.
	Now, these people are not about getting rid of sin.
	They're not about understanding what it takes to make peace with God and the price that is paid.
	And that's one of the things that is different about Christianity.
	In Christianity, it is God who came in the form of man.
	To pay the price so that he could have mercy and justice.
	He cannot look the other way.
	There has to be justice.
	But he took the penalty on himself.
	And so that's the key thing with all the stuff that they want to run away from.
	With their fun and games.
	And with their business.
	But probably quoting Isaiah would be a little bit too offensive for somebody.
	Anyway... That person's name is Nikki Scher.
	She is the digital content director.
	As one person said, when Christianity came to Rome, It manifested as a government when it came to Europe.
	It became a culture when it came to America.
	It became a business with people like digital content directors.
	Importantly, in a disclaimer, the guy who did the interview, he says it's important that elevation absolutely emphasizes the resurrection of Christ in an Easter service.
	And they use that word while the guy is standing there in a bunny costume, I guess.
	It's just clownish.
	The question is, you know, are you, in this life, do you really understand what is happening?
	I began talking about Kate Middleton.
	One guy said, when you preach to people, he says, you preach as a dying man, talking to other dying people.
	You think that's what's happening when this guy's putting on a bunny costume?
	Is that the attitude that he's got there?
	Is this something they take seriously?
	Are you playing with your sin or are you fighting your sin?
	That's the issue that the people need to look at.
	And so DeSantis has put in a settlement with the LGBT lobby on the don't say gay law as they characterize it.
	See, the election is over.
	Now we can drop the pretense here.
	Allowing LGBT influencers within Florida school systems to continue virtually unencumbered in their efforts to indoctrinate public school children there.
	The state of Florida reached a settlement last week with a pro-LGBT group called Equality Florida.
	They're not about equality.
	They're about superiority.
	Other plaintiffs in a case challenging the Parental Rights and Education Act enacted in 2022 when he's thinking about running for president.
	The settlement allows LGBT promoting safe space stickers, discussions about sexual orientation and gender identity in the classroom as long as they are not part of formal instruction.
	Again, this goes back to fight about why are you teaching my kids about any sexual stuff here?
	I mentioned going back to the late 80s, early 90s, you had a guy who got in trouble.
	He got arrested, thrown in jail because he went there to take his kid out of a sex education class.
	She was eight years old.
	He said, she doesn't need to be in this.
	I'll teach her about this when it's age appropriate for her.
	It's not. I don't want her in it. They said, no, she's going to be in it.
	So he went to that day to take her out of school.
	They arrested him for trespassing.
	They said, when you drop your kid off, you have, this is what the judge said, you've abandoned them to the state.
	And loco parentis, we will operate in place of the parent.
	And so the question is, why is anybody dropping their kid off at a school that determines that they're going to talk to them about sex?
	Do you want strangers talking to your kid about sex?
	If you went to some kind of an entertainment venue, you're going to the movies, or you're going to some kind of a ball game or something, and you've got some adult there that wants to start talking to your kid about sex, or talking to your kid about what they do sexually, what would you do with that?
	Well, it's okay, isn't it, if it's done by teachers in a school, when you're not around.
	That's just fine, isn't it?
	This law now, this agreement that DeSantis has, he's no longer sanctimonious, I guess.
	He is de-sanctimonious.
	He's de-sanctified.
	It also explicitly permits student cross-dressing, same-school sex dances, reading assignments, assignments, And school plays with LGBT themes.
	LGBT anti-bullying instruction.
	By the way, you know, what about that racial bullying that was going on?
	You know, the fight where that white girl was teamed up on and a black girl who was much bigger than her banged her head repeatedly into the concrete.
	The extent she's still in a coma may not survive.
	Her parents, the parents of the Person who beat that girl, maybe to death, her parents said she's the victim.
	She's the victim. Can never be a white person who's a victim.
	And all this stuff about bullying, as I've said many times, bullying has always been there.
	There's nothing unique about this.
	You get a bunch of kids together that like chickens, they'll find the weakest one and they'll just peck on them, right?
	Bullying is always there for any reason.
	Groups like the CFC interpret this as code for LGBT indoctrination, and it is.
	On-campus extracurricular activities, such as the Gay-Straight Alliances, are notorious for indoctrinating and sexualizing schoolchildren.
	As a matter of fact, you know, the guy Sam Britton, who had the bald head and lipstick and all that, you know, and...
	I was going around stealing suitcases from women at the airport.
	Well, he was also in a group called the Trevor Project, where he would hang out.
	They would counsel LGBT kids in high school and junior high school and things like that.
	I mean, it's just a way for pedophiles to groom kids.
	That's all it is. The agreement inverts the purpose of the statute.
	The settlement draws a false equivalency.
	Between destructive LGBT lifestyle choices in traditional heterosexual relationships and families, and between transgenderism and biology-based understanding of sex.
	Said an organization talking about the organization's Christian Family Coalition of Florida.
	They said that in a statement to LifeSite News.
	Ron DeSantis' office described the details as a major win.
	After signing the agreement, That guts the law that he put into place and then ran for president on.
	So I say we never had any people of integrity from the very beginning.
	But while all that is happening, you have a teacher who decides to pray before school begins and all hell breaks loose.
	This is one of these things where meet you at the pole.
	It's not anything I was ever involved with.
	It happened long after I was out of school, but they would Have Christians pray at the flagpole or something before school starts.
	And this is in Texas.
	The American Center for Law and Justice has gone to federal court in Houston on behalf of an employee of the Katy Independent School District.
	So this is the free exercise of religion by a person who is a school employee.
	That's not allowed. But grooming and sexualization of the children is allowed, encouraged, demanded, mandated.
	The federal court filing explains that the district violated and continues to violate her rights to religious expression by prohibiting her from praying when students might be present, even if that prayer occurs off the clock.
	Off the clock. But porn is good, and we need to give more porn to the kids in school.
	Every year millions of people gather at school flag polls to pray before the school begins, says the ACLJ. We're very proud to stand in support of See You at the Pole, a prayer rally for students and participating adults to lift up their schools in prayer.
	Our client has prayed at the pole every year on behalf of her students.
	This year, she had gathered with two friends and fellow teachers to pray at the school flagpole.
	The school principal called these teachers into his office, then told them they could not pray at the pole or in the presence of students, because if they did so, Students may see and join in.
	Wouldn't it be interesting if they applied that standard to sexual content?
	You can't show people pictures of what you do as adults and you can't talk to them about what you do as adults because, you know, if you're doing that kind of thing, the students might want to join in.
	Well, that's precisely why these people are doing it, you know.
	He told them that it was against the law for them to pray publicly where students could see them and then pointed to a school policy.
	Well, school policy is not the law.
	That prohibited teachers from praying in the presence of students.
	What would we do if there was a law like that?
	You know, what if the government said you can't pray in public?
	Or let's say, what if the government said you can't meet in public because there's this mysterious virus going around that you don't see anybody sick with?
	What would we do in the case of that?
	Or even if it was a virus that was going around that was real, and you see people dropping like flies, and I say, well, everybody's sick, you can't go, you can't have a church service here.
	Well, what should we do?
	I said at the time when this was being locked down, I said, we should do...
	What did Daniel do?
	Well, when they told Daniel he couldn't pray, what did he do?
	He went up into his room.
	He opened up the window so that everybody could see.
	And he prayed there on the balcony or right there at the window so that everybody could see what he was doing.
	He flaunted it to them.
	We need to engage in that kind of civil disobedience.
	That's a good example that Daniel did there.
	No, you can't tell me anything about this.
	And yet we had a lot of people who...
	Put the pinwheels on their heads, so to speak, and did whatever the government told them to do.
	This is the free exercise of religion.
	This is not about establishing a religion.
	If you establish a religion, what you're telling people is that they must do this.
	They must attend.
	They must pay money to this church or whatever.
	The people who found this country knew exactly what that was about.
	That's what they had left England for.
	And that's what they were afraid the federal government was going to do, because all these different states at the time had established religions.
	That even if you didn't attend, you still had to pay.
	kind of like the established religion of the government schools that even if we don't attend, we still got to pay. That needs to be taken down for the same reasons you took down the establishment of religion, because the schools are there to establish a religion, whether it's secular humanism, Marxism, racism, whatever it is, sex, it's there for that purpose.
	The ACLJ explained that the Constitution, quote, protects the rights of religious employees to pray even publicly. They do not somehow lose their constitutional rights just by being a government And this is the whole issue with the military mandates as well.
	A lot of the people, you know, people say, well, you signed the military, so you've got to take orders.
	I signed up to support the Constitution.
	And, you know...
	If supporting the Constitution means that I disobey orders, I'm going to support the Constitution.
	And this, folks, is why they're removing duty, honor, country at West Point.
	For the same reason they put out these mandates and kicked people who put duty, honor, country and the Constitution ahead of unlawful, unconstitutional orders.
	The school was sent a demand letter giving instructions to stop infringing on their First Amendment rights, responded, but then abruptly doubled down on its position.
	It continues to insist that teachers or other employees can read or pray religious materials during a time when students are not present, but only at that point in time.
	So finally, like I said before, yeah, but porn is okay, right?
	Porn for kids is being labeled as decency.
	You see, prayer is bad.
	Porn is good.
	Now, here's the equation.
	School is bad.
	Democrats in one state are pushing their decency agenda so that children will have access to pornographic materials in libraries.
	This is in Maryland.
	And this guy that's blowing a whistle on it is with the Maryland Family Institute.
	He said, the term Orwellian is overused in modern political discourse.
	That's because the authoritarian regime of George Orwell's classic dystopian novel is an easy comparison for whatever thing the speaker wants to argue against in a political debate.
	But sometimes the comparison is truly deserved, like when politicians seek to quell political discourse By torturing language itself to suit their ends.
	And he said this is what's happening with their decency agenda.
	A Democrat with the Maryland legislature and the House of Delegates has a decency agenda.
	Oh, that sounds good, right?
	I'm not asking for Marylanders to believe in what I believe in or compromise their values.
	We know that we will never agree on everything.
	We shouldn't, said the person with the family organization.
	But they said, this is about respects of the Democrat.
	But the actual contents of the agenda are a little bit different, such as Freedom to Read Act, hidden among other non-discrimination schemes, would simply take away the abilities of libraries to get state funding to regulate or to restrict access to pornographic materials.
	I'm not exaggerating.
	Anyone paying attention to debates about the content of public school libraries over the past several years, including all the allegations of book banning, is familiar with the caliber of smut that the radical progressives are trying to foist on our kids.
	The new decency plan literally guarantees access to indecent materials.
	Well, this is what they always do, isn't it?
	They turn the language inside out, upside down, because it is a perverted society that we've established here.
	We'll be right back. Whether you're feeling like the blues or bluegrass, APS Radio has you covered.
	Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APSradio.com.
	Music playing.
	show.
	Let's talk a little bit about squatters, because we do have a solution for this.
	But I've had a lot of readers who have contacted me.
	This listener says, will our government mandate citizens to house illegal aliens?
	It's starting to look that way, as a matter of fact.
	It's a workforce housing and community land trust, and it's a way to move against private property.
	As I said before, we got a pressure from the bottom in terms of people who are acting as squatters.
	We also have pressure from the top with these private equity firms that are coming in.
	Workforce housing, community land trusts, all a means to an end to private property.
	And so the listener writes, Will, our government, under the crises, so-called, of illegal immigration, for humanitarian manipulative reasoning, mandate that citizens of the U.S. open their homes to house illegals?
	This reminds me of the movie Dr.
	Zhivago. Yeah, because this is all Marxism, isn't it?
	Talked about that many times.
	You know, Dr. Zhivago comes back.
	He is a doctor from a wealthy family.
	They have a big house.
	And there's a whole bunch of people living there, and they're just waiting for him to step over the line verbally or with a gesture or something like that so they can throw him in prison.
	And they've relegated his family to a corner of the attic and He knows their game.
	He's very obsequious to them.
	But it's a lot of pressure.
	They just come at you. We've just commandeered this.
	As I said many times before, as a kid when I saw that, I completely missed the love story stuff.
	It just went over my head. The adulterous affair and all the rest of the stuff, which annoyed my parents.
	But... It was a communism that I saw there that was like, whoa!
	So you pick up on different things.
	When the communists took over Russia, they mandated private houses be proportioned into smaller living quarters for multiple numbers of people to occupy for, you know, equity.
	Or in the recent past, in Europe, older people kicked out of their long-held places of residence to house newly arrived illegal immigrants.
	Also, recently, houses that are owned by citizens in the U.S. not occupied due to a house being empty, sale, or rent are now vulnerable to anyone, including illegal aliens, to come in.
	That's why I said, you know, we have to...
	I think the term squatter is probably...
	The best term that we could have.
	They don't, you know, AP and these language police have different things that they're pushing.
	I think maybe that's the best term we could have.
	This was sent to me by Handy, EMS, out of Atlanta.
	He said, here's another story about the homeowner arrested in their own home.
	This one, though, is in Atlanta.
	Remember before we had New York, a lot of people look at it and say, ah, it's just New York.
	New York is crazy. And it is crazy.
	But as I mentioned before, you know, Goatree, one of his employees had a situation with us in Texas.
	Here's one in Georgia.
	It isn't exactly the swatter kind of theft, he says, but notice that in this case, the rightful homeowner was also arrested.
	Ironically, they say, it made us feel like squatters.
	He said, to my knowledge, squatters are treated far better than this man who actually owned the house.
	So, again, they're elderly.
	He said, this is pretty close. I could drive there in a half hour or 45 minutes or so from where he lives.
	And this story, this is a couple.
	They're forced out of their home after somebody stole it from them.
	Now, this is not somebody physically occupying it as a squatter.
	This is something where, based on their age, they're 77.
	They had probably paid off this home loan.
	And somebody then took out a loan on it.
	Because if it was encumbered with another loan, probably somebody would have noticed that when they're filling out the paperwork.
	But I think he found this old couple who had paid off their mortgage and didn't have a mortgage on the house.
	And they filed paperwork there, used that to take out a loan.
	And so they had a local TV reporter who investigated this.
	So they'd lived in the house for more than 20 years.
	But when the reporter got there, all their belongings were outside on the yard.
	And she said, it made us feel like we were squatters.
	They just tossed my stuff out like it was trash.
	A man used fraudulent documents to take over her property.
	And her husband was arrested for refusing to leave.
	She said, I don't know how this is possible.
	How does this happen?
	She said she and her husband began getting letters in the mail saying that taken out, oh, it was wrong, it was a second mortgage.
	They did already have a mortgage.
	She was able to do this, a second mortgage, because I guess, you know, first mortgage company, they're already secured in their position.
	But they said there was something about a second mortgage, which they said they never took out.
	We don't have a mortgage like that.
	By Tuesday, a man told them that he was the owner and had purchased the home from foreclosure.
	It's too easy to forge a deed and to record it.
	She said it's a big problem nowadays because of the fact that e-filing and the e-recording of deeds is so easy.
	It's very easy to record forged deeds.
	Again, if you bought a house recently, you know, you do everything.
	They send you stuff by mail, you know.
	You don't have to even have a closing in person anymore.
	They can do it with all e-documents and things like that.
	Another example of why, you know, you can have fraud with anything.
	It's just that when you have the digital world, it makes the fraud so much easier to accomplish.
	It really does. That's what concerns me about cryptocurrency.
	Notaries are not checking identification on these documents, he said, to verify this.
	And there's no place for them to contest this.
	He said there's no people's court for challenging a wrongful foreclosure or for challenging a forged deed.
	That is the fundamental problem.
	And her husband... We're still in jail when they got there.
	Even if a homeowner can prove that they've been the victim of this type of fraud, a judge can still order them to move out and still order them to pay.
	Isn't that amazing? Even if you prove fraud, a judge could still do this.
	This is why it's so concerning now that we have...
	Wall Street casting such a lustful eye on single-family homes.
	What is really going to be the result of this?
	One listener wrote me and says, well, they're going to control the price.
	That's going to be the bottom line on us, and that is really true.
	They will control the price.
	That's the purpose of them trying to get a consolidation, a monopoly, When you have fewer of them and they're very big, they can control the price.
	Just take a look at what is happening with usury laws that have long since been removed on the banking services.
	Now that we have fewer banks, do they pay you any interest?
	No. Do they charge you extraordinary amounts on credit cards and all the rest of the stuff?
	This is what is going to happen.
	As these same ruthless companies get the majority, the vast majority, and they're almost at the tipping point right now.
	44% of the homes, as I pointed out last week, 44% of the homes that were sold were bought by these private equity firms.
	And that's more than double what people were pointing at.
	They said, well, you know, right now it's about, you know, 16, 20% or whatever.
	It's going to be at 60% in a few years.
	But it's already double what those people are saying.
	It's going to go over the 50-60% thing much, much sooner.
	So I had a listener who said, since the housing crisis, this has really exploded.
	And so he said, so here's some pros and cons to think about.
	He says, first of all, it's going to be increased rental supply.
	Well, that's a pro. He says, you've got three pros and a couple of cons.
	An increased rental supply.
	Well, that would be a pro, I think, if you wanted to rent, but not everybody wants to rent.
	And most people realize that with renting, you never get any equity in anything.
	Renting is the way that the person who owns the stuff and rents things out, that's the way they get really wealthy.
	That's why the renter economy is what they want to impose on everybody for everything.
	Whether you're talking about a home or you're talking about your car, Even when you're talking about software, they all want the renter model.
	They don't even want you to own DVDs.
	They want you to rent them, streaming them all the time, or CDs, music.
	Everything is about making sure that you don't own anything.
	So I don't know that having an increased supply of rental stuff is necessarily a good thing.
	Professional management.
	Homes are typically managed by professional property management companies.
	But again, the...
	Even before the Trump lockdown, you were starting to get a concentration of this stuff.
	And now, after the lockdown, it has accelerated it.
	And if you have a limited number of people owning this property...
	We know that with lack of competition, what they're going to do, they're not going to be managing it all that well.
	And then access to capital, he says, is a pro.
	Private equity firms have significant financial resources to purchase and renovate properties on a large scale.
	Well, that's assuming that that's what they want to do, but then, of course, they will also set the price.
	And if there's a few of them, They're going to set the price pretty high.
	That's the reason they want to consolidate.
	That's the reason why you have all these billionaires from David Rockefeller up to Peter Thiel saying competition is a sin.
	Peter Thiel didn't use that word because he doesn't have any concept of sin.
	David Rockefeller was a Nominal Christian or whatever.
	Living in America at that point in time, people would understand that vocabulary, whether they were Christian or not.
	But Peter Thiel doesn't use that exact phrase, but it means the same thing.
	The greatest evil is competition, they say.
	So they need to consolidate everything.
	On the con side, you've got reduced home ownership properties.
	That's a big con.
	Because the truly big con, as we all know, and they've been upfront about it, is that you'll own nothing, that you'll rent everything from them, and then they will be able to increase the rental rates.
	That's a number two negative.
	And then the impact on the community.
	Some critics argue that the prevalence of investor-owned rental homes can change the character and the stability of neighborhoods traditionally dominated by owner-occupied housing.
	Oh, absolutely. Take a look at housing projects with welfare.
	And does anybody ever fix those up?
	No. If they do anything, kids will destroy it, put graffiti all over it.
	That's not the case with, you know, growing up in Tampa.
	You can see the difference there.
	There were a lot of old neighborhoods that That right after I left and graduated and got married and moved away, and they came back, they had a mayor there in Tampa, Sandy Friedman.
	They called her Sandlot Friedman because she was going in and confiscating single-family detached homes.
	They were very poor homes.
	They were very small, and the people were poor.
	They'd had them for a long time.
	But she would come in and say, well, your grass is not mowed properly, so we're going to hit you with fines.
	Let these fines rack up or come in and say, well, I see some, you need to repaint that house.
	And if you don't repaint that house, I'm going to start giving you a $50 a day fine or something like that.
	And before long, these people couldn't afford it and they would confiscate their house for a very small fine.
	Small compared to the value of the house.
	But these people, these neighborhoods were much, much nicer than you would see in a government housing project.
	Because they would keep it up as well as they could.
	They might not be able to put a new coat of paint on it, but they would keep it clean.
	They'd keep the yard clean.
	And it was a completely different prospect.
	But today, all of the governments want to make sure that we don't have a stake in anything.
	That all the stakeholders are going to be this small group of people out there.
	It's so bad that Babylon Bee has even picked up on it.
	A new squat B&B service.
	To help squatters find the perfect home to take over.
	Far too often, squatters take over a new home without knowing the quality of amenities provided or the difficulties dealing with the host, said Squat B&B CEO. Our service allows squatters to read reviews from other squatters who have stayed at a property and to see honest feedback about what each home has to offer.
	We have millions of homes on our site ready for immediate squatting, and the best part is, it's absolutely free!
	Squat B&B will allow squatters to write reviews and to post photos from any home that they have stayed in as well as leaving a rating for the owner of a home.
	Sadly, some homeowners can be difficult to communicate with on issues such as utilities or not wanting to give up their beds for the squatters.
	Owners can leave reviews about the people squatting on their home that other hosts will be able to read.
	Squatters who consistently achieve good rankings will be highlighted as super squats, which helps them to get access to luxury properties.
	Michigan is offering homeowners $500 a month to house newcomers.
	See, that's what we said.
	This is where this is happening.
	A couple of these articles talking about that.
	And calling them newcomers.
	Like I said, don't call them illegal aliens or foreign citizens here illegally or undocumented migrants or migrants or whatever.
	And certainly not newcomers.
	Call them squatters because that is the perfect metaphor for what this is all about.
	The program in Michigan is called the Newcomer Rental Subsidy.
	I mean, it might as well be Squat B&B. It will provide shelter outside of state shelters for refugees, quote-unquote.
	These people are not refugees.
	They're not fighting political persecution.
	As a matter of fact, the Biden administration, which has opened up the borders for so-called refugees, Tried to deport real refugees.
	The Christian homeschool family Germans who fled Germany because they're going to arrest the parents and take the kids away because they're homeschooling the kids out of a religious conviction.
	They've been left alone for 10-15 years.
	And the Biden administration just last year tried to deport them.
	They really were refugees.
	But they were the wrong kind of refugees.
	Well, what do we do about this?
	Turns out that there is a solution to this.
	You can out-squat the squatters.
	And there's a guy and his name is Flash Shelton.
	That is evidently his real name.
	And he has an organization where he helps people.
	And he was interviewed by Varney on Fox News.
	And he has a squatter solution.
	Listen to what he did at his mother's home to get rid of squatters.
	Squatters took over my mom's house after my dad passed away.
	We were trying to sell the home.
	I called local law enforcement and as soon as they saw that there was furniture in the house, They said that I had a slaughter situation and they had basically no jurisdiction and they couldn't do anything.
	So I dissected the laws over a weekend.
	I basically figured out that Until there's civil action, the squatters didn't have any rights.
	So if I could switch places with them, become the squatter myself, I would assume those squatter rights.
	And just in case they had a fake lease, like I hear some do, I had my mom write me up a lease.
	We got it notarized.
	I packed up my Jeep, drove up there, and...
	Paced out the joint around 4 a.m.
	I waited about 8, 8.30 in the morning.
	Three cars pulled out of the driveway, and I made entrance to the house.
	I put up cameras, waited for them to come back, and they didn't have a lease, so that never came into play.
	But when they came back, I just laid it out for them, told them that it was all locked up, cameras, and the only way they would get back in the house is if they broke in on camera, and I would prosecute.
	And I told them they had a day to get their stuff out or the furniture was not theirs anymore.
	But you couldn't have gotten them out unless they had left in their three cars in the morning.
	You couldn't bang on the door, walk in and tell them to get out.
	You couldn't do that, could you? No, the law would prevent me from physically removing them.
	However, being that I wasn't the homeowner, I had more rights.
	As a tenant, I would actually have more rights than them.
	So if they were there, then I would have just entered the home with a lease in hand.
	I would have just shown them the lease.
	I would have walked past them and said, You know, I don't know what you're doing, but I'm moving in.
	This is my house now.
	And I probably would have just done anything and everything I could to make it miserable for them so that they left on their own.
	Are you running a service now helping other people get squatters out?
	Yeah, so more importantly to that is I'm trying to change the laws.
	That's my number one focus.
	So in helping others right now, since I feel bad I can't help everyone, but if we can change the squatter laws, I feel like that's the way I can help everyone.
	So every time I help someone, whether it's a...
	I do Zoom consultations, I ask people to make a donation to the cause, and when I can physically...
	Go out and help them.
	Yes, it is something I am doing to help people now, as many as I personally possibly can.
	Yeah, United Handymans Association.
	His name is Flash Shelton.
	But isn't that interesting? He worked it out.
	He said, so the government hates people who own things, right?
	So if I'm a tenant and I've got a lease, that puts me in a superior position to these people.
	And I can get them out of there.
	Isn't that amazing? That we have a government that allows squatters to take your property.
	But we also have a government that will use SWAT teams without a warrant to break into your home.
	You realize how the government has been weaponized against us and against all principles, don't you?
	It truly is amazing.
	Well, again, whether we're talking about squatters or we're talking about swatters, swatters are good.
	Squatters are good, so just do a no-knock raid or a no-knock and just take over the house.
	Either way, whether a swatter or a squatter, our government is setting on us.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we're going to come right back.
	Stay with us. Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
	From country to blues, classic hits to news, APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
	Get details at APSradio.com.
	♪♪♪
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, welcome back. And I want to thank General McGuffin.
	Thank you very much. I appreciate that.
	It's very kind and generous on Rockfin.
	The tip says, thank you, Dave, for staying in the fight, keeping us informed with missed information.
	Your sense of humor makes it fun.
	This only is a drop in the gas tank.
	Well, thank you very much, though.
	I appreciate that. Hopefully it helps.
	It's been a while since I've contributed, so here's a step towards catching up.
	God bless you and your family for your active service.
	Well, thank you very much. And also on Rockfin, thank you, Gregory Walter.
	And I want to thank, just finish up with the Zell people from March.
	This is, let me continue, and I read the name before because this is somebody that has contributed twice this month, two of them as a matter of fact.
	Gretchen C., William R., David M., Justin F., Alexander W., Manny D., Jennifer J., Jeffrey C., Kenneth C., Gregory I., Kimberly M., Brian P., Jared U., Scott L., Manny D., again, and Kyle H., and Raymond G. Thank you, all of you.
	I really do appreciate that so much.
	All of us do in the family.
	Thank you. Having something that is physical, that is private, that secures your financial transactional privacy is gold and silver.
	People, if you want to, as Gerald Slinty said on Friday, he says, I use gold and silver.
	He says, I have a little bit of gambling money that I put in crypto.
	That's kind of the way I see it.
	It's like a stock market or something like that.
	It's very volatile. But gold, even though we see the price change, It's very slow moving and progressive, and what you're really seeing is valuation and the value of the dollar.
	That's what changes. Gold is pretty much keeping its value.
	So that movement around there that you see really is the fiat currency and the arbitrary feeling about fiat on any given day.
	So if you want to try to prepare for that, Tony Ardman is a great way to, his wise wolf gold is a great way to buy gold and silver.
	He can handle transactions of any size.
	He can help you with an IRA, with a rollover.
	He can also help you to gradually accumulate it in a small amount each month and you get to take advantage of the group buy there with Wolfpack.
	So again, davidknight.gold will take you to Tony Ardeman's Wise Wolf Gold.
	We've got just a little bit of time left, and...
	I wanted to talk a little bit about money before we leave.
	And, of course, we've also got the red flag laws, which I did not get to today.
	But we just had Merrick Garland announce that he wants to have a national red flag law.
	And everybody is angry, as they can be, at the Biden administration.
	They should be. But you do understand, this is another Trump precedent.
	A precedent Trump.
	He was the one who said, we're going to take the guns and do the due process later.
	And I said, well, you know, if you set things up like that, and if you do gun control by executive order with a bump stock, and of course, Trump also did a pistol ban, a pistol brace ban, I should say, you do that kind of stuff by executive order, immediately, Lala Harris picked up on it and said, yeah, I'm going to do that as well.
	I become president. I'm going to give them 100 days to enact my gun control agenda.
	If they don't do it, I'll do it myself, just as Trump just did.
	And just as Trump did with the red flag laws, now Biden is doing it as well.
	It helps if you've got somebody who's got principle, but the way that you defeat these things is at the state level.
	So that's all I'm going to say about the red flag stuff today, but when we're looking at money, Understand that there is a relentless push to go cashless, a relentless push to go into CBDC. And that more than, you know, the value of gold or silver at any given moment relative to the dollar is the thing that motivates me on this.
	has announced that they will go completely cashless this year.
	It is a subsidiary of one of the biggest banks in Australia.
	That is Commonwealth Bank.
	Bankwest is the subsidiary.
	They're already making great shifts to accommodate a cashless society.
	And earlier this month, the bank announced that they would be closing the remainder of their branches and focusing strictly on digital.
	They said this transition of Bankwest to a digital bank will result in the closure of 45 Bankwest branches by October of this year.
	Another 15 branches will be converted to locations of Commonwealth Bank.
	Bankwest says their decision rests in that, quote, 97% of all Bankwest transactions are now completed digitally and fewer than 2% of customers visit the branch regularly.
	They added that the average number of over-the-counter transactions are 30 per day and 15 in regional Western Australia.
	This is why Catherine Austin fits.
	So we've got to set aside a day.
	Cash Friday, she said, make sure you use cash.
	If you don't use it, you're going to lose it.
	And we've seen this.
	This is Australia. We saw it happen, and I think it was Finland.
	It was one of the Scandinavian countries.
	I think it was Finland. And so, look, nobody's using cash anymore, so we're just going to shut it down.
	Just this extra thing. And why do we have ATMs and all the rest of the stuff if people are not going to be using cash?
	And so, you know, the convenience of just being able to take out a plastic card and swipe it, if we don't get the cash and use cash, then it'll make it very easy for them to take it away.
	And again, cash is anonymous unlike anything else.
	Cash or gold or something like that that's physical.
	None of these other things are going to have that kind of anonymity.
	And so we need to try to force ourselves to do that.
	Dave Ramsey was always against using credit cards and would have people on to talk about, you know, not going into debt, not going into credit cards.
	They really hated the plastic card stuff.
	And I remember he had a physician on who said, yeah, you know, I... Don't struggle with this as much as somebody else with a smaller income would, but he goes, I force myself to use cash even when I get gasoline.
	I force myself to go in and hand them cash and then go back and get the change and all the rest of the stuff because, he said, I don't want to get in the habit of running stuff up on a credit card.
	And when you have a certain amount of cash and you force yourself with the discipline of just using that cash, That instinctively is going to limit what you can buy.
	Well, I just don't have the money for it.
	Whereas if you got the plastic, you can continue to accrue debt.
	So it's a smart thing.
	From a budgetary standpoint, from a way to control your expenditures to have that.
	But it's vitally important for us to maintain that anonymity.
	By the way, this ridiculous bill that was passed by the House, you know, they put it out in the dead of night, like 2.30 in the morning.
	1,000 pages, $1.2 trillion in additional spending.
	And by the way, that's in addition to the $1 trillion that's added every 100 days because of debt, interest on the debt.
	I mean, the way that they're going into debt is just unbelievable.
	But that bill that funded all this stuff and went right through the House, and of course over the weekend we had some House members push back against that, that only went through after they removed...
	A censorship, anti-censorship thing, and an anti-CBDC thing.
	That shows how important those are.
	That's even more important to them to be able to spend their $1.2 trillion on all their special projects without any oversight or accountability, is to make sure they keep censorship there.
	No anti-censorship, no anti-CBDC. And it's passed in the Senate.
	Thank you for joining us.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲