Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 21, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:13

The David Knight Show - 03/21/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	Using free speech to free minds.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 21st of March.
	Year of our Lord, 2024.
	Well, yesterday I talked about the illegal squatters stealing people's homes.
	What an outrage it is that we don't have a government that will protect our rights.
	But, of course, they're stealing our country.
	And right after the show yesterday went viral, a TikTok video.
	From a Venezuelan guy who has 300,000 followers.
	And he's telling them how to game the system.
	And the next game they're going to play is to deliberately do what I was talking about in New York.
	We're going to begin with that, but we've got all kinds of stuff.
	CIA conspiracy theories.
	The JFK assassination, a lot of things came up yesterday.
	Chemtrails legislation has now made its way through in Tennessee.
	And, you know, another one of these conspiracy theories that turns out to be true.
	We'll be right back. Yeah, it truly was amazing to see this guy.
	And the hatred that he has.
	Really nasty. I'll show you the video.
	It's all in Spanish. But I'll let you know what the guy is saying.
	But I just want you to think back to last week.
	When I talked to Drago Dzerian, the Polish guy, he wrote a book, My Pledge to America, you know, from a prisoner in Poland, a communist prisoner, to a Navy SEAL in the United States.
	All of his life he wanted to come to America.
	He wanted the freedom that was in America.
	That's the old style of immigrants.
	And of course, we also have here, I'm not going to show you the video, but it's also in Spanish.
	I think it was CBS. We'll get to it.
	But it was a mainstream media organization that went to a guy.
	He didn't speak English, but he's hard at work.
	They come into the garage where he's working, doing auto repair, ask him if he would vote for Trump.
	And he says, well, he's a racist.
	But I came here because I want a better future for my family.
	My kids are citizens, and I want the economy to be good here.
	So he goes, you know, it's about the economy.
	Stupid. I don't know.
	Maybe he said that in Spanish.
	I don't know. Quoting James Carville.
	But the problem is, is that we don't have people who are coming here because they love the idea of liberty, as Drago, the Navy SEAL, did.
	Or because they want economic opportunity.
	They want to work hard and get rich.
	No, this guy is completely different.
	And he is what I've been talking about.
	People who come here for free stuff.
	For free stuff.
	He tells his followers, his 300,000 followers, you people came here to work and pay taxes?
	I'm not here to work. I'm here on vacation.
	I've got an acre baby son.
	I just collect a check from the government.
	They're not coming for freedom.
	They're coming for free stuff.
	They're trespassers.
	They're thieves.
	These types of people.
	And that's what Biden has opened up the border to.
	So, again, there's good people coming.
	There's bad people coming. The problem, folks, is the welfare state.
	Nobody would come here in the 1800s and the early 1900s.
	They wouldn't come here because they're going to be on vacation, live off the state.
	That wasn't there.
	There was no welfare state.
	The welfare state has been a giant magnet to pull people in.
	And it was a plan by the Democrat Party how many times we talked about, Cloward and Piven.
	They said, no, the welfare state's there to take down the economy so we can make everybody poor and dependent on the government so we can control them so that we can be the ones in charge.
	That's their plan.
	Nothing really has changed.
	It's not a genius plan that the technocrats are doing or the globalists at the UN, the World Economic Forum.
	They got all these different ways to do it, whether it's with a pandemic MacGuffin or a climate MacGuffin They always want to destroy our independence.
	That's especially true when you talk about transportation, for example.
	I've watched this all of my life, these people trying to sell a light rail system or a monorail system, this boondoggle program that nobody wants.
	Why? Well, because it makes us dependent on the government for transportation.
	We've got to sit there and wait for their schedule to come around.
	Instead of just having a car that we can take somewhere.
	But that's why they love it.
	It's because it makes us dependent upon them.
	The entire welfare state was predicated not for people's welfare, but it was a war against our independence.
	It was a war to make us dependent upon them.
	And now they've got a lot of different ways that they seek to do this.
	And so, this is just another one of those.
	Here he is, the guy talking about illegal squatting as a business.
	Oops, sorry, wrong one.
	Here it is. Invading a house in the United States.
	I'm going to tell you how to do it. I found out there's a law, he says.
	There's this guy.
	Yeah, this is on TikTok.
	This is definitely going to help their case to ban TikTok.
	But let's ban this guy instead, okay?
	Let's not ban the freedom of the internet and applications.
	I don't want the government to have that problem.
	But they always, you know, create a problem like this guy.
	And then they will not address that problem like this guy.
	Instead, what they will do is have another problem come in, which is, let's give ourselves the power to take down websites and applications.
	So, you get the idea.
	To invade a house. To invade a house.
	Since we are not in a street situation.
	So, again, I guess there is, by the way, there is an app out there, I just saw.
	People have asked me, can you get the show translated into Spanish?
	Well, so this guy could see it.
	Come to my house.
	That's fine. We're ready for him.
	Easy Dubs Messenger.
	Chat without language barriers.
	This is what he needs to expand his audience there, don't you think?
	We all need to know what this guy is saying.
	We've had some people who have translated it for us.
	But you can translate your voice.
	You can dub videos. You can even do phone calls in a different language coming soon.
	Soon it'll be fast enough that we'll do it in real time.
	It's kind of like the debabilizers from Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, isn't it?
	I guess we're going to need those if we're going to continue down this path, aren't we?
	Well, he is, like I said before, he is from Venezuela, has 300,000 TikTok followers.
	He says, my people have thought about invading a house in the United States because I learned that there is a law that says that if a house is not inhabited, we can expropriate it, he said.
	His name is Leonel Moreno.
	The law says that if the abandoned houses are deteriorated in bad condition, we can get it, repair it, live in it, even sell it.
	Well, it doesn't even have to be in bad condition.
	They don't have to repair it.
	He said, I think it will be my next business to invade abandoned homes.
	Because he's already invaded our country where our government has abandoned its duty in the borders.
	Right? And it's not just Biden.
	It's the Republicans. Look, this border issue has been going on long, long before Trump got elected in 2016.
	The Republicans have always used this issue because they don't do anything about it.
	They want to keep it there.
	Just like they want to bring back abortion and make that another issue.
	Make it a national issue that they can run on.
	And all they're doing is making it worse.
	Now Trump is talking about 15 weeks.
	Well, we've got places that I guess he thinks it's too harsh.
	You know what DeSantis did.
	It's too harsh. It's too sanctimonious to protect a baby when it's got a heartbeat.
	So Trump will take it up to 15 weeks, which, by the way, France was 12 weeks.
	12 weeks in France.
	So Trump wants more liberal abortion laws than even France.
	And let's put it back at the federal level.
	Let's take it away from the states again.
	He's a traitor.
	Benedict Donald.
	He'll betray every issue.
	The man has no foundation.
	He has no moral compass.
	But back to this problem that we still have because he did nothing about the border, folks.
	He did nothing about the border.
	The Venezuelan national, the only thing he did was to restrict travel when he had to create his phony pandemic.
	See, he can restrict travel if he really wants to.
	And he wanted to restrict travel to build up his phony pandemic.
	And so he did a little bit more restriction of the travel.
	But that's the only restriction he ever put on the border.
	The only one. And I've talked about this before with...
	Sheriff on the border. They're in Arizona.
	So they didn't put any restrictions in except for the pandemic.
	This guy goes on to say, the best course for action for illegal aliens like him is, quote, to invade houses since we're in a street situation and it's the only way that we have to avoid living on the street and not be a public burden.
	Oh, he's so concerned about being a public burden, is he?
	He made headlines last month after bragging on TikTok about how he exploits his child to live off of U.S. taxpayers to avoid working.
	He says he lives like he's on vacation.
	And he's telling other people to do this.
	And he's got an anchor baby vacation.
	He says, you came to the United States to work.
	I came to vacation.
	Look at the difference.
	You and I didn't come with the same purpose.
	You came to the United States to pay taxes that you didn't pay in Venezuela, he said.
	And again, yesterday I talked about the New York owner, but I said that's not the only case of that.
	I talked about a couple of other cases, but I talked about what happened in Texas with one of Goat Tree's employees.
	Yeah, they can do the same thing there.
	Once somebody breaks into you, if you're away from your home, and it was a situation where his employee was on assignment working for about a month or whatever.
	The house was vacant for about a month.
	These people break in, and the police won't do anything about it.
	Well, I don't know if you've got some kind of a lease agreement with him.
	You're going to have to go through this process.
	A bureaucratic process to evict them.
	And they get to live there for free.
	But you try to do anything about it, they'll arrest you.
	You see, our government pays invaders to come here.
	It's kind of like Trump paying governors and public health officials to do medical martial law.
	They pay for this stuff.
	They enable it. They pay the UN, who pays NGOs, who hand out cash cards and provide transportation to people who come here from all over the world, and you pay for it.
	But that's the way our government does it, and that's why they have the massive Federal Reserve thing.
	It's going to be hard to see the dollar standard go if it goes.
	Folks, it'd be the best thing that can happen to us.
	We've got to take away this credit card from the federal government.
	We've got to take away this ability to create money out of thin air.
	If we don't, there will never be any checks or balances on the federal government because everything is like a blank check to them.
	They just keep writing checks.
	And they don't have to worry about the balance either.
	Well, as an example of this, a non-profit's just been caught on video handing out residency papers to a man who had no ID. This is in New York City.
	This is something that was done by muckraker.com and then forwarded by the Heritage Foundation, who has an oversight project.
	The non-profit organization, this one's called La Jornada, And creating documents for a person, filling out residency documents for a man who has no form of ID, nothing whatsoever.
	So just as the Federal Reserve creates money out of thin air, you have these NGOs who create documents out of thin air.
	The Supreme Court had said that Texas...
	Could arrest illegal aliens in the state.
	And then immediately the Biden administration and late night appeal puts it on hold again.
	And so, you know, when you look at all this stuff, is Abbott really any different than the New York Police Department facilitating some squatters stealing a woman's home?
	He's not. He could do something about it.
	As a matter of fact, he has less of an excuse than the New York Police Department does.
	I mean, there is some ambiguity there.
	Do you have, you know, we got laws about the relationships between a homeowner and somebody who's renting from them.
	And those are there for a reason.
	And they're saying, well, I don't know if that's there or not.
	Well, you know, if you're going to take that position, you should...
	Require the people who say they're a renter to show some kind of documentation that they're actually renters.
	But they don't do that.
	The reality is that Abbott is even more culpable in this because Abbott has a duty.
	He doesn't just have a right.
	He doesn't just have the state powers that were not delegated to the United States to protect his citizens and his state.
	He has a duty to protect them.
	And if the federal government is not going to protect this country, if the federal government is not going to stand with the Constitution in any area, he has a duty to do that as well.
	But it gives him an excuse.
	And it's the same type of thing that we've seen happening over and over again.
	Trump used that excuse.
	Well, I'm going to get rid of the DACA people, and I'm going to do this, I'm going to do that.
	Well, let me ask the Supreme Court first.
	Oh, the Supreme Court says I can't do it.
	Never mind. I tried.
	Nothing I can do.
	And so he's going to let the Biden administration change the locks or take the locks off of the house, abandon it, and let these people come in.
	And he's not going to do anything about it.
	In Florida, you have Governor DeSantis saying that he will send Haitian migrants to Martha's Vineyard.
	Are you getting tired of this kind of theater?
	I'm really getting tired of it.
	You know, for Abbott and DeSantis to do it, initially it made a point.
	And we could all see the hypocrisy of these people.
	Oh, get them off of my island.
	I can't afford to have them here in New York or Chicago or Denver.
	They're busting our budget.
	And so... That was an important part of it.
	However, I'm really getting kind of tired of these governors of Texas and Florida facilitating illegal immigration by busing these people further in or sending them further in.
	The time has passed.
	You made your point. And the people in the Northeast have seen this.
	And they're not going to stay there if they can't get the free stuff that they want from New York or Chicago or whatever.
	They're going to go to the rest of the country.
	And shame on you for facilitating this, just like you're some NGO bringing people into the Darien Gap.
	I'm sick of this stuff.
	I'm sick of this game now.
	It's now become a game.
	It was always a game, but you could argue that it had a purpose at the beginning.
	It no longer has that purpose.
	So what you need to do is you need to send these people back to where they came from.
	And if you can't put them back to where they came from, create a big open-air prison and put them there and film it and put it on TikTok, just like this guy's putting his stuff on TikTok, and influence the people to not come in.
	So you want to come in?
	Well, we're going to put you into an open-air prison here.
	You want to do that? We're not going to give you a credit card and a phone and release you into the country.
	We're not going to give you a credit card and a phone and put you on a plane to Martha's Vineyard or to Chicago.
	We're going to put you in a prison, an open-air prison.
	You're going to do some hard time.
	You might want to stay where you are, because no matter how bad it is where you stay, where you're coming from, we're going to make it worse when you come here.
	They need some toughness.
	I'm sick of the games being played by the Republicans.
	I'm absolutely sick of Republicans.
	I never called myself a Republican.
	I've registered as a Republican in the past so that I could vote in some elections.
	But I've never been a Republican.
	I was a third-party candidate.
	It just makes me sick to see these people.
	I know the games they're playing.
	I know what they're doing.
	Mexico says it will not accept deported citizens from Texas.
	Well, why wouldn't they? We'll accept the citizens from people who are not citizens can come in.
	It's a one-way door, isn't it?
	And so Babylon Bee responds to that and says, Mexico begins constructing a wall to keep illegal immigrants from coming back.
	And they've got the Mexican president saying, a nation without borders is not a nation.
	Which is why we've heard Democrats say over and over again.
	But we know that they don't want this nation to exist.
	Biden is telling Latino voters, he said, you're the reason I beat Trump in 2020.
	He says, I need you back.
	He told several dozen supporters in a Mexican restaurant in Phoenix.
	He said, it's the choices between me now and a guy named Trump.
	And you don't like Trump. He doesn't like you.
	Well, as I said before, it was interesting.
	Actually, it wasn't CBS. It was CNN. Rosa Flores went to a guy who is from Mexico.
	He has lived in Houston for 25 years.
	And the whole time she's interviewing him, he's in a shop.
	He's working really hard. Doing repair.
	Despite describing Trump as a racist, this guy, Galacio Veliquez, He tells CNN's reporter he would support Trump if he could vote in the U.S. election.
	Why? Well, because it's the economy, stupid.
	He wants the economy to do well for himself.
	He says, I've got kids who were born here.
	I want them to have a future.
	Biden doesn't want us to have a future.
	But it's not just Biden.
	It's Trump as well. I mean, I interviewed David Stockman.
	David Stockman, who, as a Republican, In the Reagan administration, at the Office of Management and Budget, he opposed Reagan when Reagan recklessly went into deficit spending.
	That was not a good thing.
	I mean, the Reagan tax cuts were a good thing, but they didn't cut their spending, and so the deficits exploded.
	And David Stockman held the line on that.
	He held the line on principle. And now he's written a book.
	I'm sure he's getting all kinds of rotten fruit thrown in him.
	Trump's War on Capitalism.
	And I had him on November, December, before the book was released in January, to talk about the fact that, look folks, what Trump did in the first three years was not good.
	The economy was not good.
	What he was doing was he was giving us a sugar high, a sugar fix.
	It's very easy to pump up the economy.
	We're going to see that happening with the Federal Reserve and the Democrats.
	They're all over.
	You've got all these progressives and you've got Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren writing letters to the Federal Reserve and saying, cut the interest rates.
	They're very concerned.
	This is an election year. They want everybody to be happy.
	And, of course, you can do irresponsible things like that, and you can give people a temporary high.
	And that's what Trump was doing his first three years.
	He had not made any structural fixes that were going to help us.
	We had quantitative easing.
	We had low interest rates.
	We had this and that. And then the fourth year was absolutely disastrous, as we all know.
	But it was bad before that.
	It just got so much worse so much faster.
	By comparison, the first three years looked good.
	But it wasn't good.
	And it's not good to pump things up.
	It wasn't good. The deficit spending and the borrowing that Reagan did was not good.
	But this is far more than that.
	And so all this stuff was set into motion even before the pandemic panic scam happened.
	But it was accelerated with all of that at the same time.
	Well, we have from illegal aliens who want to see the economy do well to billionaire investors.
	People are falling in line behind Benedict Donald left and right, top and bottom.
	This is a billionaire investor who says he's going to back Trump in 2024.
	Why? Well, his issue is the border.
	And this is Nelson Peltz, billionaire, activist, investor.
	He says, yeah, I don't like Trump.
	He said, it'll probably be Trump, and I'm not happy about that.
	But he said, Biden's mental condition is really scary, and the border is wide open.
	Peltz expressed his concern regarding the poorest U.S. southern border, which has turned into a hot-button issue for both Republicans and Democrats.
	I just don't know how the Republicans make a case that they're going to do anything about this.
	They have held this out as a carrot for decades, decades, and never done anything about it.
	How in the world do they keep fooling people like that?
	It truly is amazing.
	It truly is amazing. Nobody ever holds them responsible for it.
	Because the Democrats just want to go pedal to the metal as fast as they can.
	Republicans at least say they don't want to do that, but they don't do anything to stop it.
	This guy Peltz says we can't go on letting everyone into this country.
	He said we have an immigration problem.
	It's not a Republican or a Democrat problem.
	I want some boundaries put on it so we at least know who we're bringing in.
	Well, the thing is, again, you know, the Republicans haven't done anything about it.
	Trump didn't do anything about it.
	We had, in his first two years, Republican President Trump, he had a Republican Congress, House and Senate, and they did nothing about it.
	It's not just our border, of course.
	It's other places. Cuba's very close.
	Haiti's very close. Cubans nationwide are taking to the streets, chanting freedom.
	They don't have any food.
	They don't have electricity. And they're very angry.
	You know, this is what it's going to look like here.
	It's a dry run, really.
	I had somebody send a thing to me and said, you know, what you said about Haiti is really the CIA's version of what's going on there.
	And some people have said the CIA is orchestrating the unrest there.
	I have no problem believing that.
	But quite frankly, I'm not interested in getting involved in domestic Haitian politics or in domestic Cuban politics.
	My concern with Cuba and Haiti is limited to them coming here and bringing their problems.
	But I know that the CIA is all about coups everywhere, including our own country.
	No doubt about it.
	Certainly believable. When you look at what happened with Panama, you have Noriega, who was an ally of the CIA, an ally of George H.W. Bush.
	He decided that he would go in on his own.
	And so George H.W. Bush took him down and started calling him Strongman Noriega.
	I'm going to take that strong man down.
	What does that mean? What does it mean to call somebody a strong man?
	Anyway, demonize him, invade the country.
	It was one of the first times we saw strong evidence that directed energy weapons were used against cars.
	Eyewitness testimony. I remember the documentary, Panama Deceptions, narrated by Elizabeth Montgomery.
	We had it in our stores. And, you know, they had these incinerated cars and other things that, you know, made a pretty compelling case that it was directed at energy weapons now, which people are looking at with all these different fires, whether it's Hawaii or the Texas fire, any of that. Nevertheless, hundreds of Cuban citizens took to the streets to protest against power blackouts, severe food shortages.
	Looks like the World Economic Forum's agenda has already kicked in there, doesn't it?
	A total lack of political rights.
	There you go. No electricity, no food, and no rights.
	We're all about to become Cuba, aren't we?
	And that's why I say we get too much to be concerned about every time our country gets involved in a foreign country.
	It usually is to destroy it.
	So they chanted electricity and food.
	Fatherland and life.
	And they chanted freedom.
	So these people, they're nationalists.
	Power blackouts that can last 20 hours a day have plagued Cuban citizens for years.
	This is the benefits of communism.
	So you get power four hours a day and blackouts 20 hours a day.
	But now it's gotten a lot worse.
	Dramatically worsened in recent weeks.
	So I guess maybe they don't get any of the four hours.
	How can it dramatically worsen when you've only got four out of 24 hours you've got power, and then it gets dramatically worse?
	They said it's practically all day.
	In other words, they just don't have it at all.
	But it's good for the environment, so you just need to shut up and take it, which is what Biden, our Castro, would say.
	An anonymous Cuban citizen told the AP that the Castro regime had disrupted internet service in the area as videos of the protests began servicing on social media.
	Isn't that interesting? They have no food, they have no electricity, but they got internet.
	Why would that be? Well, because the government needs to keep track of people.
	They need to track them.
	So they'll give you internet.
	And then if you start saying the things that they don't like, they'll shut it down.
	But the internet is there to track them.
	And then if that gets out of hand, the censorship comes on.
	Which is what they did.
	The whole purpose of the internet.
	From the very beginning, folks.
	Another thing from the U.S. intelligence.
	The whole purpose of the internet was to spy on you.
	To control you. Created by DARPA. The Defense Advanced Research Projects.
	So... Again, when we look at this, the Supreme Court lifts a stay on Texas.
	Immediately, Biden appeals that.
	And then you've got Abbott saying, aw, shucks.
	I guess I can't do anything about it.
	And that is really going to be the case.
	Do you really think that DeSantis wants to do anything about people coming from Haiti or Cuba?
	Do you think that Abbott really wants to do anything about people coming across the southern border from Venezuela, Mexico, wherever?
	No. No, he doesn't.
	Just a lot of blustering about state power versus the president.
	When push comes to shove, they do absolutely nothing.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	Music playing.
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	Elvis. Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles.
	And the sweet sounds of Motown.
	Find them on the Oldies channel at APSradio.com.
	Well, the U.S. government is warning of cyber attacks against the water system throughout the nation.
	This is predictive programming.
	This is preparation. In this article from Bloomberg, and it's been picked up by a lot of the left mainstream media.
	Drudge is featuring it.
	Look, if they wanted to, what are they going to do if they attack the water system?
	Are they going to release even more fluoride into it?
	To poison it even more?
	To make it obvious what's going on?
	The thing about poison is you've got to be very subtle about it, right?
	Disabling cyber attacks are striking water and wastewater systems throughout the United States, said the EPA. We talk about hypocrisy.
	The EPA is trying to destroy our power grid.
	This is unprecedented in what the EPA is.
	First they moved to destroy cars.
	Now that, you know, they come up with electric cars, they're moving to shut down the power stations that provide electricity to the grid, so you won't be able to use your electric cars.
	This was foreseen for quite some time.
	You know, we had Eric Peters and I talked about this for a long time.
	They said, we know what they're going to do. They're going to come after the EPA is going to come after the power stations, and that's happening now under the Biden administration.
	So for the EPA to say...
	This, that they're worried about water and wastewater systems.
	Weren't they the ones who polluted that massive river out west?
	Weren't they the ones who just looked the other way in East Palestine, Ohio?
	They don't care about water being polluted.
	They are the ones, one of the biggest threats to us.
	They're the ones, by the way, who are trying to shut down and cover up.
	Well, no, actually, that is, I think that's HHS. Because that was the guy dressed as a woman, you know, and calls himself Rachel.
	Dick Devine, who shut down the reports that was coming out of HHS about fluoride.
	And then this is the dead giveaway.
	I've said before, and I'll say it again.
	Whenever you see a mainstream media news report that comes out that says hackers from this country did something, they're lying.
	And we know they're lying. And they just sent the guy to jail for 40 years that gave us Vault 7.
	Vault 7 shows that the CIA and the NSA had created tools to allow them to do cyber hacking and to appear as any country that they wished, friend or foe.
	And so they can make it look like they're coming from Russia or China or Iran or you name it, right?
	North Korea, you name it. And so here's what Bloomberg is telling us, which is, folks, this is 100% a lie.
	They're very specific about it.
	Something that they cannot know.
	Hackers affiliated with the Iranian government, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, And look at that specificity.
	It's not just that this was coming from somewhere in Iran.
	We know that it came from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
	They're lying to you.
	That's a lie. They couldn't know that.
	They couldn't even know that it came from Iran with any certainty.
	They said they've attacked drinking water systems.
	Why are they saying this?
	Well, because they want to perhaps attack our drinking water systems, but we know they want to attack Iran.
	Everything your government tells you is a lie.
	Everything your government tells you is to facilitate war abroad and against us at home.
	That's what the federal government does and has done for a long time.
	Would the U.S. government cut off water to us as a way to exercise control?
	Would the U.S. government cut off water to us As a way to create chaos as they're leaving the border open?
	Would they put poison in the water?
	Well, yes, they would. They do.
	Fluoride, and they cover it up.
	And if you've got any government scientists who want to do a report and tell people that, then you appoint a tranny psychopath to shut that down, which is what Biden did.
	In late November, an Iranian-backed hacking group attacked Israeli-made digital controls commonly used in the water and wastewater industries in the U.S., affecting multiple organizations across several states.
	Let's unpack this. First of all, there's absolutely no way that they know that it's an Iranian group.
	Secondly, they attacked digital controls that were created by Israel.
	So the question is, is this Mossad?
	Is this the CIA? Who is doing it here?
	It's just as likely the CIA or Mossad as it is Iran doing something like this.
	But then, did it even happen?
	Did we see any evidence of this?
	Or is this just a phony story that they're feeding people through Bloomberg and the press?
	They said it happened across several states.
	Has there been any evidence of this?
	Quite frankly, I look at this and I'm not aware of any evidence.
	Maybe there is. But it certainly does sound like what Steve Pchenik did with the sting.
	He said, right now, We had this blockchain watermark thing out there in the ballots two days after the election, he said.
	We know exactly who it was that stuffed the ballots, and President Trump has sent out National Guard, 20,000 of them, and they are arresting people as we speak, he said, two days after the election.
	I said, well, that's total nonsense.
	Because he couldn't do that without anybody noticing.
	You're going to send out that many National Guard and start arresting people and nobody's going to notice it?
	Well, Steve Pachenik said, and I thank the press for not reporting this.
	Give me a break. Give me a break.
	I guess we could thank the press for not reporting that the Iranians somehow hacked an Israeli digital control system across several states that nobody noticed.
	While the incidents didn't interfere with water quality or supplies, I said, well, see, nobody noticed.
	They hacked these things and nobody noticed.
	They highlighted contentious talks between the U.S. government and municipal water associations over how best to protect the water supply.
	I imagine what they did, they said, even Bloomberg said the talks were contentious.
	So probably you have some federal agency coming in and say, we're going to take this over and we want to do this and we want to do that.
	And they said, no, you're not. We have local control over this water supply and we're going to keep local control.
	Well, I don't know. I think you need to let us take it over because I think we just detected a disturbance in the force.
	And I think that, you know, there's something going on here.
	And those dastardly Iranians, or maybe the Russians, will hack into this and take it over.
	So you need to give it to us.
	This is some kind of a power play.
	And it's a fantasy narrative.
	Trying to scare people.
	So again, there's no doubt, as Bloomberg says, that drinking water and wastewater supplies are an attractive target for cyber attacks, but they're just as attractive a target for our own government to attack us, especially if that own government wants to take over local control of the water systems.
	Because, you know, if they do that, then if this court case that is currently running through blows up in their face over fluoride, well, they'll still be able to keep control and still be able to continue to slow poison us, as they've done for the longest time.
	Speaking of slow poison and chemicals everywhere, we have the Tennessee State Senate.
	Passed a bill that would ban the spraying of chemicals for geoengineering in our skies.
	And so we had 24 senators who voted in favor.
	Senator Nicely was one of those, one of the good guys.
	Six of them opposed.
	Our federal government, says Robbie Starbuck, who wrote about this, he said, our federal government has a dark history of spraying and poisoning citizens with toxins that they never consented to come in contact with.
	Yeah, he mentions the St.
	Louis situation during the Cold War.
	But, of course, our own government did that in California.
	They did it at sea, let it drift onto shore.
	They did it in the New York subways.
	They said, don't worry, it's not harmful, but it's something that we can track.
	And they've been doing it in water systems everywhere.
	They call it fluoridation. But our government has never really cared much about our informed consent, or consent even if it's uninformed.
	They still don't want it.
	And so this is what the bill looks like here.
	This is a chemtrail bill.
	And the key issue here, it says the intentional injection, release, or dispersion by any means of chemicals, chemical compounds, substances, or apparatus within the borders of this state into the atmosphere with the express purpose of affecting temperature, weather, or the intensity of the sunlight is prohibited.
	So you will not do any geoengineering with chemtrails.
	And overwhelming support in the Senate.
	We'll see. I think it'll probably become law.
	And as I reported, this has already happened up in New Hampshire.
	Similar bill to that.
	Inside Japan, this article here talks about, from the UK, inside the 8th, 8 billion, a futuristic city for just 2,000 people, and a mass human experiment.
	So who is doing this? Toyota.
	Toyota's doing this. And I reported on this when it was first announced back in 2021.
	Now it's come back into the news because they're going to start populating it.
	People are going to start moving in before the end of the year.
	This is just another smart city.
	And, of course, we've had these things around in the past.
	Just before they started locking down borders that killed the trip that I was going to make up to Toronto, Google had set up their smart city in Toronto in one isolated area.
	They called it Sidewalk Labs because they can throw you out on the sidewalk if you don't do everything they're going to tell you to do.
	And they... Position this, as they do with all these, as a green, sustainable thing for the environment.
	And a lot of people who really believed that nonsense signed up, and they got very angry about that, and they dropped out, they exposed it, and they shut down that experiment.
	They said, this isn't anything that's really about saving the environment.
	This is just about monitoring and watching and monetizing everything that we do, because that's what Google's business model is.
	That's what they do in cyberspace, and now they want to do this in physical space as well.
	They want to watch you monetize everything that you do, just like we were talking about General Motors and Ford, GM through the OnStar system and other things like that.
	People didn't even... No, that they'd opted in to have their driving monitored and for GM to sell the data to the insurance companies, which then might cancel your insurance or drastically raise your rates.
	And it was all about scam and making money and making money off of our data to our detriment, violating our privacy, selling information that they have collected on our side of surveillance.
	And of course, they also turn it over to the government.
	If there's anything that can be done with that.
	So now Toyota is doing that.
	Toyota, which was kind of positioning themselves as the good guys against all of this green agenda, let us come up with something other than a battery-operated electric car.
	We can make electric cars in a variety of different ways, they said.
	Let us do that.
	And they're working very hard to try to do that, working very hard to recycle the CO2 back into a fuel to please these people.
	To do a hydrogen car or something like that.
	None of these technologies are done.
	But then, of course, neither is a battery-operated electric vehicle a solved technological problem.
	So this was announced back in 2021.
	They've been working on this.
	It's just a few miles away from Mount Fuji.
	They're going to be putting 2,000 people into this city that cost them well over $8 billion.
	It's 8 billion pounds.
	Very similar, I guess, in a lot of ways.
	I'm sure there'll be some design differences, but the overall intention of entrapping us into a smart city, a 15-minute city.
	Just like Saudi Arabia's The Line that they want to put out in the desert.
	So, again, just like these dystopian science fiction films like Logan's Run, you know, if you get out of the city, now you're in the middle of nowhere.
	There's going to be even more so that way, and Saudi Arabia will be in the middle of the desert.
	Toyota is going to be using this to test prototypes of self-driving vehicles.
	See? Driverless cars guided by sensors and lights and buildings and roads across the city.
	So they're going to take this to the next level.
	They're not just going to have technology inside the car trying to operate in the world that we all live in now.
	They're going to have sensors everywhere.
	So the entire city is going to be communicating with the car all the time.
	You see, 5G is an essential technology.
	To having all this stuff happen.
	You have to have that kind of bandwidth for them to have total control.
	Yet another reason to oppose 5G. 5G will allow them to do real-time monitoring, surveillance, biometric identification, and allow them to do self-driving cars.
	And, you know, spying on us.
	That's one of the reasons why during the Trump administration said, we don't want China and Huawei putting in 5G chips.
	We will be the ones to spy on you and everybody else.
	It's called Woven City.
	It's also expected to feature smart homes.
	Isn't that great? Smart homes, smart cars for stupid people.
	Whenever they talk about that, you know, it's always...
	They'll always focus on something, and if they've got a problem with something, you know, nobody's going to do this unless they're really stupid.
	We'll call it smart.
	That'll be the thing. And I remember when I bought a car.
	It was a Volkswagen Rabbit in the late 70s.
	And I remember looking through the literature for the thing, and they made a big deal about how their steering column was articulated.
	So if you had a front-end collision, That that would break away and it wouldn't jam the steering wheel into your chest and head and kill you, right?
	And they made a really big deal about that in their sales brochure.
	I thought, well, that's nice. I mean, it wasn't the reason I bought the car necessarily, but it was pretty impressive.
	I thought, well, that's a nice thing to have.
	I'd rather not have the steering wheel shoved into my chest in a way that would be lethal.
	But it turns out that it was the worst car for that.
	That particular model, after a year or two, I'm looking at this, and I look at the Consumer Reports data, and that was its biggest flaw.
	And that's what they'll do all the time.
	They'll take their biggest flaw, lie about it, and make it their best feature.
	That's why they call them smart cities.
	So Woven City is expected to feature smart homes that run entirely on hydrogen and reduce emission.
	So the president of Toyota, his name is Toyoda, with a D, said building a complete city from the ground up, even on a small scale like this, is a unique opportunity to develop future technologies, including a digital operating system for the city's infrastructure.
	Well, let's just hope that this goes the same way as Henry Ford's dystopian rubber city, Fordlandia.
	Yeah, we should call it the rubber city.
	He wanted to, he pretty much had everything that he needed except he was dependent on foreign sources for rubber.
	They didn't have synthetic rubber at the time.
	And so he decided that he'd build an entire city that was a rubber plantation down in Brazil in 1928, about 100 years ago.
	And he put in golf courses and all this kind of stuff.
	He paid people really high wages to go there.
	And it was one of his biggest failures that he ever had.
	Hopefully this will happen to Toyota, too.
	It's about time for them to strike out.
	They've made some good choices on opposing the only battery-operated vehicles.
	That's the only thing that you can do.
	So it's nice that they gave us some alternatives on that.
	But if they're going to start getting into the smart city business, I hope they strike out big time.
	With people, buildings, and vehicles all connected, all communicating with each other through data sensors, we will be able to test connected AI technology in both virtual and physical realms, maximizing its potential.
	Yeah, they're combining AI with robotics.
	They're combining AI now with these smart cities and all the rest of the stuff.
	It's pure evil. And I hope it blows up in their face like an exploding cigar.
	We'll have to see what happens with it.
	Julian Assange.
	As there's been rumors, Wall Street Journal put it out, Consortium News said, yeah, we'd heard about this off the record, the same thing, but we did not go public with it.
	But then they did an article after Wall Street Journal did it yesterday, went public with it.
	Talking about the U.S. is engaging Julian Assange's lawyers about a deal that could set him free.
	Because he's already been in prison there for five years, never convicted of anything, of course.
	Yeah, cry crocodile tears about Trump and about Peter Navarro when they did nothing about Julian Assange.
	It was the Trump administration.
	And Barr, Bill Barr, who came after him.
	CIA Bill Barr.
	Bill Barr, the ally of George H.W. Bush.
	Why did Trump put him in there if Trump is in opposition to the CIA? Well, the CIA is not monolithic.
	But he put in George H.W. Bush's man.
	And the Bushes still hate him.
	They don't like the fact that he wants to essentially run the country club like he did Mar-a-Lago and have everybody kiss his ring.
	And so even though he tries to become part of the club, they know that what he really wants to do is to be the dictator of the club.
	So they still oppose him.
	But I don't know why this is happening.
	Is this to help Biden's image?
	Is this something he can say, well, you know, Trump and his guys went after Julian Assange.
	I released him. I don't know.
	Is this something, is this coming because the UK doesn't want the political pressure and the heat?
	Of extraditing Assange to the U.S.? That's more likely it.
	I don't know if this will happen either.
	Again, he's been charged with a lot of felonies.
	They ramped it up.
	You know, just a couple of months after Bill Barr got in, he went after Julian Assange this way.
	And then they ramped it up again.
	175 years in prison if he gets extradited.
	And the big issue, the big red line for Assange in any plea negotiation they pointed out at Consortium News, is to make sure that any deal would not have him coming physically to the United States.
	He fears the terms could be changed once he got on U.S. soil.
	The U.S. would never renege on something like a treaty or a constitution or a deal or anything.
	Seriously, you really think that the U.S. would lie?
	You think they'd break a treaty?
	He knows them all too well, doesn't he?
	So, yeah, hopefully he'll get out.
	He should have been pardoned by Trump, but he wasn't.
	We've got a couple of comments here on Rumble.
	Christine, one, two, three, five.
	Thank you very much for the tip. And she thanks me.
	Well, thank you. On Rockfin, Slomoj Slago says, it's over in Sassono, I believe between Mishima and Gotemba.
	Gotemba is where the U.S. Marine Camp Fuji is.
	Not far at all.
	Well, you have to forgive me.
	I'm an American. I don't know anything.
	The way we learn geography in America is if we start a war.
	We haven't had a war there yet.
	Maybe it is ramping up.
	But because there's not a war there yet, I'm just an ignorant American.
	I don't know where any of those places are, but I'll look them up and see what is going on.
	So there's a U.S. Marine camp in Fuji.
	So I guess that's not too far away from the smart city.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
	If you like the Eagles, the cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com.
	You might want to hear it in your pod.
	You know nothing. And be happy.
	Ain't got no cash.
	Ain't got no car.
	But 24 booster shots in your arm.
	Oh, nothing. You can't even buy shit in the store because of your low social credit score.
	You'll owe nothing.
	Be happy.
	You'll owe nothing.
	Oh And be happy.
	Be happy and eat the bugs.
	Yeah. And go live in a smart city made by Toyota, I guess, or Google or any of these people.
	They want to bring all the controls, Google and these people, all the controls that you see on the Internet, they want to make them in our physical world.
	But then they also want you to live most of your life in the virtual world.
	And that's what Toyota is saying.
	A pox on them all, frankly.
	So a judge has ordered the FBI to turn over the Nashville School Shooters Manifesto, finally.
	And, of course, the amazing thing about this, which is pointed out in this Off the Press article, even though police shot the suspect dead at the site, The FBI is saying, well, we don't want this manifesto released because it could, quote, reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings.
	What enforcement proceedings? There's no trial.
	The PERP is dead.
	This is just a cover-up.
	It's been long enough, and the public has an urgent right to know why this tragedy happened, how future events may be prevented, what policies should be in place to address this and other similar tragedies, said lawyers for the Tennessee Star newspaper,
	which has been running this lawsuit to try to get the information out of the hands of the FBI. Isn't it interesting how they try to cover up so much stuff, whether it's Flight 800 or 9-11 or a tranny shooter?
	The FBI has no right to retain a monopoly on this information.
	We see, the FBI just does not want us to think of lunatic tranny shooters who would shoot a nine-year-old kid in the face.
	We don't want to think about them as being extremists.
	No, the extremists are the parents who speak up At a PTA meeting or a school board meeting about the filth that's being shoved in the faces of their kids.
	And even if they don't have their kids in that school, to stop it from happening to society at large.
	Now, the FBI is on the side of the tranny killers.
	They're trying to cover this up.
	Just like the CDC and other people cover up and redact information about the poisonous shot.
	Also here in Tennessee, a bill would allow guns in businesses that want to be gun-free.
	They put up a gun-free zone sign on a door, as this is from bearingarms.com.
	They said, well, you see that in some places.
	In some places, it doesn't really mean anything.
	You still have a right to go in there.
	But in some states, there is a criminal penalty if there's some notification on the door that you're not allowed to carry a gun in, and you do it anyway.
	They will actually make it a crime.
	And so this guy says, well, for the record, he goes, what is being talked about in Tennessee, where signs would have legal force, they now have legal force, and so they would change it to the owner having to actually come up to you and tell you to leave.
	If they come up and confront you, then you would have to leave.
	But I don't see anything in this law that would then also make the owner liable.
	If a shooting happens and you are injured, because you can't defend yourself.
	That's really where it should go.
	But as he points out, he goes, look, I value property rights.
	He said, so I'm okay with that.
	He lives in Georgia, and he said that's what the situation is in Georgia.
	We haven't had any problems with it.
	That the signs, you know, if they put up a sign, we don't want you caring.
	That doesn't stop you from caring.
	But then if they come up...
	And tell you to leave specifically because of that, get rid of your gun and or leave, then you have to do it.
	If you don't do it at that point, then it is some kind of a crime, trespassing or something like that.
	And in the bill in Tennessee, anyone confronted by a business owner would be required to remove their firearm or other weapon from the premises.
	So I think that's fine.
	Again, it's the private property right of the business.
	And this is very different, by the way, from reason...
	And Cato and Heritage and other conservatives and libertarians who say, well, social media can tell you that, you know, I don't like them kicking me off, but if they don't like my speech, they can throw me out of their platform.
	No, their platform is a digital public square, and they've said it in testimony over and over again.
	And they've been given section 230, which says that we're not going to hold you responsible.
	Of course, the government is lying.
	They twist their arms.
	They coerce them to ban the people that they want banned and to cover up other things.
	But the theory behind that is that they're not publishers.
	It's just a public square.
	It's a digital public square.
	People should be able to put stuff up there.
	And I've said over and over again, this is a very different situation than if somebody goes in and starts to exercise their free speech, sets up a soapbox and starts talking about something in a mall, because a mall is retail space.
	It's retail space out in the center of the mall as much as it is inside one of the big anchor tenants.
	And so that is retail space.
	That is not the public square.
	But the public square is what these different places are.
	And so when you bring a firearm into a premise like this, it is not a public square.
	It is private property.
	But I do believe that I don't have the...
	The addition that if this person disarms you and you're injured, now they're responsible.
	Because that puts a little bit, makes them think about what their policies are actually doing.
	If you're going to take away my firearm, you better have some way to protect me there.
	You got some armed guards here that are going to, because it can happen anywhere.
	Anywhere. So, again, that is not in the bill.
	So that is a little bit of a problem.
	And then we had a hearing, and actually it was quite entertaining, as you watch Senator John Kennedy from Louisiana interview these appointments, these judicial appointments from the Biden administration, these people who know absolutely nothing.
	And there's nobody better at pulling the curtain back And showing the profound ignorance of the law that these Biden appointees have.
	This is U.S. District Judge Nancy Maldonado of the Northern District of Illinois, struggled to respond when asked by Republican Senator John Kennedy to define the term assault weapon.
	And so, the...
	She, and they go back and forth with this, but it's good.
	I'm going to play it for you here. She was nominated by Biden to get a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
	A big promotion. It's just one level down from the Supreme Court.
	This woman could, she's young enough, that she could be elevated by another Democrat president, even Biden, to the Supreme Court.
	It wouldn't be the first time you put somebody in the Supreme Court that doesn't know anything.
	You said, quote, assault weapons may be banned because they're extraordinarily dangerous and are not appropriate for legitimate self-defense purposes, close quote.
	Tell me what you meant by assault weapons.
	Thank you, Senator Kennedy.
	Just to clarify there, I was local counsel.
	But you wrote the brief.
	Tell me what you meant by assault weapons.
	Senator Kennedy, actually, I did not write the brief.
	The brief was written by...
	You signed the brief, though, didn't you?
	Correct. I signed the brief.
	When you sign a brief, you're testifying to the court that everything in it is true, right?
	Yes. She should know that.
	And I... They're your words in terms of the court, right?
	Well, you're correct, Senator Kennedy.
	I would never sign... Tell me what you meant by assault weapons.
	So, I am not a gun expert, and at the time, that brief, I think, was about 10 years...
	But you were giving the court advice about, say, ban assault weapons.
	What is...
	I'm just... You told the court you were an expert.
	Just tell me what you wanted to ban.
	Senator, sitting here today, as I said, I did not write that brief.
	I was local counsel. Sign the brief.
	I understand. Tell me what you wanted to ban.
	That's all I want to know, Judge.
	I don't remember the exact definition of assault weapons in the ordinance that was at issue.
	So you submitted a brief to an appellant brief.
	You signed it.
	And you don't know what, and you said abolish assault weapons, and you don't know what you wanted them to abolish?
	Senator, at the time that I signed the brief, I read the brief because our Supreme Court required someone, an Illinois bar member, to sign the brief.
	I was not responsible for researching the content.
	You were responsible for the brief, yes.
	Absolutely. Absolutely.
	And sitting here today, I do not remember the characteristics that were cited in the ordinance for the assault weapons ban.
	It's not an area of practice that I have specialized in.
	I'm sure 10 years ago, I could have answered your question.
	It's sitting here today. You think you deserve to be promoted?
	Senator, I stand by my record.
	I stand by my record.
	Yeah, yeah. Well, I think her record says that she will sign things that she doesn't know anything about.
	She'll present herself as an expert in something that she has absolutely no idea of.
	And of course, that is the issue.
	What is an assault weapon?
	These people don't know what an assault weapon is.
	They don't know what a woman is.
	They're absolutely clueless.
	How did they get to a position where they're ruling over us?
	And then here is another one.
	This is AOC in another hearing.
	She has a big issue with the fact that they have brought up RICO charges.
	Now, you know, this is the thing that just keeps bouncing around.
	As I said the other day, you know, Giuliani built his career off of RICO. And I've said for the longest time, RICO is an abomination.
	It's an unconstitutional denial of due process.
	Confiscating assets and civil asset forfeiture grew out of RICO. If you go back and look at the DNA of this and how this idea, we're going to take assets from people before we convict them.
	As a matter of fact, the purpose of RICO was to say, well, we've got these really rich people in organized crime.
	They've got so much money they can hire really good lawyers and they can beat us in court.
	So let's take their money first so they can't hire good lawyers.
	And then we can win. That's how Rudy Giuliani made his career.
	That's why, I guess, one of the reasons why he's such an awful lawyer.
	You can't, if you disarm the other side, you can go over and, you know, beat them, shoot them, stab them, whatever, after you're taking away their arms.
	And that's basically what he was doing legally from that legal standpoint.
	When we had to go into a situation where the other people were not disarmed, then he didn't do too well.
	But now he is being hoisted by his own batard there in Georgia.
	And here is AOC, Occasional Cortex, who is very concerned about the fact that they're talking about RICO statutes being applied to one of their people.
	Mr. Bobulinski, I heard your opening statement.
	It's submitted to the record, part of our proceedings.
	I have a quick question.
	Simple. Is it your testimony today that you personally witnessed President Joe Biden commit a crime?
	I believe the fact that he was sitting with me while I was putting together a business deal.
	Did you witness the president commit a crime?
	Is it your testimony today?
	Yes. And what crime have you witnessed?
	How much time do I have to go through it?
	It is simple. You name the crime.
	Did you watch him steal something?
	Corruption statutes, RICO and conspiracy.
	What is it? What is the crime, sir?
	Specifically. You asked me to answer the question.
	I answered the question. RICO, you're obviously not familiar with.
	Excuse me, sir. Excuse me, sir.
	RICO is not a crime.
	It is a category.
	What is the crime?
	It's a category of crime that you're then charged over.
	You have charges. You have charges.
	Sir, please name. Want me to name the exact statute under RICO? Yes.
	Well, it's funny. In this committee room, everyone's not here.
	There's over eight... All right. She's just not up to the standards of John Kennedy.
	Rhetorically. Yeah.
	RICO is not a crime.
	It's a category. You know, murder is not a crime.
	It's a category. Yeah.
	It really isn't a constitutional crime, but it is a crime that they charge people with all the time.
	Democrats are celebrating when Trump and all these other people in Georgia, along with Rudy, all got charged with RICO statutes.
	That's what Fannie Willis specializes in.
	That and civil asset forfeiture, stealing people's cash if they happen to have big piles of cash like she brags about having.
	Well, I don't know. It's just cash.
	I keep cash. There's nothing criminal about me having cash.
	It's criminal if you got cash.
	So, again, RICO statutes morphed into civil asset forfeiture and all of that stuff.
	It's an abomination against the Constitution, against due process.
	But she's trying to play a game that she can't really...
	So now the cortex to pull that off with.
	And then we've got this surface yesterday.
	You had Ron Paul on with Tucker Carlson talking about the CIA assassinations.
	I just saw this morning that Ron Paul was on with Angry Tiger.
	That's probably a lot more...
	Interesting discussion.
	But again, with Tucker, they focused on CIA and then people started pulling back and criticizing the overall issue.
	The statement that Ron Paul made, that it was a coup, It's absolutely true.
	Tucker pretends that this is all news to him.
	But when you look at this, one of the things he said was Alan Dulles was running the investigation.
	And so then Tucker and Ron Paul were saying, well, that was the guy that was head of the CIA. Well, not at that point in time.
	And so...
	Tucker says, so the guy who was running the CIA that assassinated JFK is the guy who then runs the investigation.
	And it's not strictly true, chronologically, but for all practical purposes, it is.
	CIA Director, people are putting this up to fact-check it.
	CIA Director Alan Dulles said, Whom Kennedy had fired in 1961, later served on the Warren Commission.
	That part of it is true, but he had already been fired two years earlier.
	When the 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion, which the CIA had orchestrated, proved to be a disaster as well as an enormous political liability for Kennedy, he fired the director and his deputies, threatening to, quote, smash the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.
	Well, he also fired Lyman Limitzer.
	They had Operation Northwoods.
	I've talked about that before.
	The plan there was to fly planes into buildings and blow them up and then blame it on Cubans so they would have a rationale to invade Cuba.
	To fly remote-controlled planes.
	This is in the early 1960s, Operation Northwoods.
	You can look it up. It's been declassified.
	To fly the planes out over the ocean as if they're being hijacked and have them disappear, blame that on Cuba.
	To have them attack military bases and actually kill Americans on American military bases and blame it on Cuba.
	The guy who was running that, Chief of Joint Chiefs of Staff, he was also fired by Kennedy.
	Then he resurfaces as the head of NATO. After the assassination, and I think it was after the assassination, he became the head of NATO. And then you had Operation Gladio, which was a false flag attack, trying to make it look like they are...
	Terrorist organizations, the Red Brigade, and others, they were the ones who, and that was the one that included the murder of the Italian Prime Minister Aldo Moro in the Italian trial, penned it on Steve Pachenik, saying he was sent by Henry Kissinger to make sure that Aldo Moro was killed because he knew too much.
	So many things are tied up in that, of course.
	And that was also the beginning of the conspiracy theory label that they use on people.
	As somebody put up, this is the actual memo now that we've seen where the CIA war-gamed the idea to counter criticism of the Warren report, as ridiculous as it was.
	I mean, so many people were involved in this.
	She had Arlen Specter, who sold the magic bullet idea.
	He was a junior guy.
	He was rewarded by being made a senator for life after that.
	But as they say, our concern of the Kennedy assassination, speculation about the responsibility for his murder, although this has stemmed from a time by the Warren Commission report at the end of September 1964, various writers have now had time to scan.
	And there have been a new wave of books and articles criticizing the commission's findings.
	In most cases, the critics have speculated as to the existence of some kind of conspiracy.
	And often they've implied that the commission itself was involved.
	Imagine that. Well, that's exactly what Ron Paul said yesterday, and he's exactly right.
	It was a vast conspiracy.
	Every time the government charges somebody, they always charge them with conspiracy as well.
	It's very rare that they will, outside of assassinations, they always have a lone shooter.
	But if it's anything other than a political assassination, they always will charge people and say, well, there's more than one person involved.
	That's a legal conspiracy.
	So I said, presumably as a result of this increasing challenge to the Warren Commission's report, a public opinion poll recently indicated that 46% of the American public did not think that Oswald acted alone.
	It's much higher now. This is written at the time.
	So I said, this trend of opinion is a matter of concern for the U.S. government, including our organization.
	The members of the Warren Commission were naturally chosen for their integrity, their experience, their prominence.
	You know, people of the caliber of Fauci, they represented both major parties.
	And they and their staff were deliberately drawn from all sections of the country.
	So the bottom line is, we recommend...
	The discussion of the assassination question be initiated where it has not already taken place.
	This discussion, active, and we will use the term, as I point out later in this document, will come up with the idea of conspiracy theorists.
	We will use that label to intimidate any discussion.
	Of course, that was before they decided that they would just openly censor people that they don't like.
	Ban people financially with what they now are going to call their open financial system.
	Open banking is what they call it.
	We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	Oops. Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles!
	And the sweet sounds of Motown.
	Find them on the oldies channel at a PS radio.com on.
	On.
	Make it rain!
	sense. Common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well we have Biden's top intelligence agency.
	The agents of the CIA, the FBI investigation and throughout the intelligence community have distributed a newsletter that celebrates an intelligence official for cross-dressing.
	Of course, this is coming from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the DNI. And this is not really anything new.
	We had Michael Flynn at DNI who was pushing a cross-dressing seal all the way back in 2014, 10 years ago, when it was only the second year.
	That they had even had their Pride Month there at the Pentagon, and he was already pushing the transgender stuff, Michael Flynn.
	You know, this Christian leader that is selling himself out there to reawaken America.
	But Biden's top intelligence agency says that cross-dressing makes a man a better intelligence officer.
	Well, it certainly does get you promoted in the Biden administration.
	I've got to say that. It may not make you better, but they are looking for sociopaths, as John Kiriakou points out.
	He says, you know, they told us that they're looking for people who are sociopaths right up to the level of psychopath.
	Unfortunately, sometimes they get a little bit over the line into the psychopath area.
	But I guess it is the kind of person that they're looking for.
	Somebody with some deeply rooted psychological issues that are there.
	They said, dressing up in a woman's clothes makes him a better intelligence officer, according to a document obtained by the Daily Wire.
	Well, you know, I guess being disguised as a spy...
	The problem is that when you wear a disguise, you're really trying to blend in.
	You're not trying to draw attention to yourself, and usually these cross-dressers are attired in a way that is like a big neon sign.
	I'm an intelligence officer, and I'm a man who likes to wear women's clothes sometimes.
	This sounds like a Monty Python sketch.
	Remember this? I'm a lumberjack and I'm okay.
	Oh.
	Ha ha ha.
	Uh...
	Ha ha ha.
	I'm an intelligent... I'm a spy and I'm okay.
	I put on women's clothing and hang around in bars.
	The unclassified newsletter, which specifies on each page that it is for official use only and not cleared for public release, was released to the Daily Wire last week, though information such as names of authors are redacted throughout.
	It was created by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, IC, Intelligence Community, Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility Office, and sent to the entire intelligence community.
	The Office of the Director of National Intelligence is a cabinet-level agency overseeing the rest of the intelligence community, including all these agencies, the CIA, the FBI, the NSA, and the military intelligence branches.
	I think my experiences as someone who cross-dresses have sharpened the skills I use as an intelligence officer.
	And then at one point, he says it has expanded his perspectives as well.
	He has a, quote, better appreciation for how it can be uncomfortable to wear women's clothes sometimes, especially those pointy-toed high-heeled shoes, I guess.
	You know, the people who are there, though, they have to be pretty careful about what they say, don't they?
	This is sent to me by a listener.
	And this is at a university where they get people accustomed to not having free speech.
	And here's a sign. It says, free speech wall.
	Please visit Student Life in room 929 to get your materials approved to be posted on the wall.
	Free speech does not come with prior approval.
	And this is what I keep saying. You know, when you talk about hate speech, you know, it may be awful speech, but it's lawful.
	And if speech is not lawful, you don't have free speech.
	You just shut it down.
	As a matter of fact, when I saw that sign, one of the reasons I put it up was it reminded me of how both the DNC and the RNC run their political conventions.
	You know, they have a really big convention every four years and they have the presidential nominations and a lot of press coverage and all the rest of the stuff.
	And for as long as I can remember...
	Both of these parties, when they have their conventions, they will not allow any protests whatsoever.
	It's not really a new thing to come after people protesting like they did on January 6th.
	No, it's not allowed at their conventions, and that's for both parties.
	What they do is they'll put several blocks down from the entrance to the convention.
	They will have an area where they put a cage, literally put a cage.
	And if you have something that you want to say, you can go in and take your bullhorn inside of that cage.
	Or you can use some of the microphones that they have in there.
	But, you know, they have this thing set up.
	You go there and you go inside the cage and there you can speak.
	And it's been that way for about at least 15 years or so.
	So just understand how pervasive...
	This hatred of free speech has been by our mainstream political parties, by our universities, by our media, by our social media.
	Because all of these institutions have the same perspective on all this.
	This is why we now look at them putting people in jail.
	That's the next level.
	Jailing people because they think that your speech is hateful.
	So they have their own little free speech area.
	You're free to say whatever you want to as long as you're far away from their entrance.
	And we saw this again at the Bundy Ranch.
	And it got featured, and even the governor of Nevada criticized the Bureau of Land Management, that BLM, for out in the middle of the desert, they set up close to the Bundy Ranch, in the middle of the desert, they set up a little area and fenced it in and put a sign on it and said, free speech area, come here and speak.
	Now, that was 10 years ago.
	That was 2014.
	But the stuff of the conventions had been going on for at least 5-10 years earlier than that.
	At least. Maybe earlier.
	That's as long as I knew about it.
	And it was essentially the same thing.
	Why would they think that that would be anything unusual?
	Everybody thought that was strange because they'd not noticed it happening at the RNC and the DNC conventions.
	But somebody did a handwritten, that was a professionally printed up sign as well, because again, they don't have any limitations on money or any of the rest of this stuff.
	And so somebody hand printed a sign there near the Bundy Ranch and hung it on there and said, the First Amendment is not an area.
	Absolutely right. Well, before we're joined by Tony, I just want to thank some of the people who sent checks.
	Let me read out first name and last initial.
	We have Timur R., David and Joan F., thank you very much, Ben and Cindy B., Thank you very much.
	That was very kind of you.
	And first time we've seen your names.
	I apologize if I mispronounced your name there.
	Jack H., David and Deborah W., Mary N., Gerald S., Ronald C., John R., Margaret Mary T., Scott C., Josh B., Stacy P., George R., David and N., Marie N., and Walter A. And I think Karen has updated the gas gauge as well.
	Thank you very much, all of you.
	I really do appreciate it.
	I've got some letters here that I would like to read while we're waiting for Tony to join us.
	I have not put together the list for the people who have contributed on Zelle.
	I will do that and read the names, but I really do appreciate the support.
	This is from David and his wife here.
	They said... Your personal mention of your trip to Niagara Falls and the tightrope story and the wheelbarrow and how bringing it to parallel the time when Jesus was there and all loved him for the miracles of feeding the multitudes, healing the sick and forgiving, but no one would go with him to Calvary.
	Getting in the spiritual wheelbarrow.
	I use my wheelbarrow a lot, and now every time I see it, it reminds me, and I pray God will give me the faith and trust to get into his wheelbarrow.
	For those of you who are scratching your head and don't know the story, it was a difficult time that we were going through, and we just had to get away, and we went to the conclusion of our business.
	We wound up as, it's a long story, but through some legal games that were played.
	They wound up ripping us off.
	We got involved in a court thing and lost.
	We just needed to have our heads cleared and took the family up.
	It was just before Thanksgiving in the year 2000.
	Everybody was litigating what was going on with the hanging chads and everything in West Palm Beach.
	Just wanted to get away from all this stuff.
	We went up to see Niagara Falls.
	And the reason I went up there was because I'd read a story about a guy who had...
	In the early days, I guess his 1800s or whatever, he was a tightrope walker, and he had a rope that was stretched across where the Niagara River, not right at the base of the falls, but it comes down as still a very, very dangerous area.
	It's still very rapid.
	It gets channeled into...
	A narrow area there.
	And he had an exhibition.
	And, you know, it was a time in the 1800s when people would show up for stuff like that in big crowds.
	And he walked across the tightrope, did a bunch of different things, did a bunch of different times.
	And finally he takes a wheelbarrow and he pushes it across and comes back.
	And he says, who will volunteer to get in the wheelbarrow and go with me?
	And nobody would.
	And the point of the story that I'd heard somebody talk about was the fact that they'd all seen it happen, but they couldn't bring themselves to put total trust in him.
	They'd seen him go back and forth, back and forth, doing all kinds of things, and doing the wheelbarrow, but they would not get into the wheelbarrow.
	The application being that if you're really going to trust God, You've seen God do things, and as a Christian you may understand that He's capable of doing these things, but you've still got to get in the wheelbarrow, and you've still got to trust Him.
	And so it was...
	Real important. I just want to go back and I want to see the spot where he did it because it's pretty much a famous thing.
	It really happened. And that was kind of where we were in our life.
	And so I'm glad that you think about that every time you see a wheelbarrow.
	It's an important... An important analogy, really is.
	This listener is Justin.
	Thank you, Justin. He says, please accept this meager gift.
	And it's not a meager gift. I really do appreciate it.
	And I appreciate, you know, this is not a meager gift for us.
	But I do appreciate the meager gifts, because I understand where they come from.
	And I understand that not that many people do support the program, and all of our support has been voluntary, really has.
	So I really do appreciate that.
	He says, the Lord has moved me to send it to you.
	I can see it is His work you do daily.
	I'm grateful for the truth you provide through a Christ-centered worldview that you both aren't ashamed of and exemplify.
	You helped open my eyes to AJ. The Holy Spirit moved me away.
	I should have known he was bad news because I... I couldn't listen to him in front of my family or in the yard.
	Yeah, you've got to be careful. He's in a bad mood.
	I have no reservations with your program.
	I know God will continue to provide because you're trusting in Him.
	Well, thank you very much, Jason.
	I appreciate that. This is from Tom.
	Tom and Nancy, who have been supporters for a very long time, said...
	Thank you for explaining the story behind the victory over Japan kiss, you know, the one with the sailor and the nurse.
	I was feeling much heartfelt empathy for the sailor after watching his testimony about this, the guy who actually did it, that they talked to him years and years and decades later.
	What an absolute shame that anyone would dare to even whisper any word of reproach to such a man for this.
	He's a hero. Almost certainly I would have gone to war in my youthful days, even against my father's wise objections, if I had been called.
	So many times I've been saved from my own foolishness.
	God will do that for us, won't he?
	I could say the same thing about the way I drive.
	Especially when I was just learning how to drive.
	And you know, when you look at it, and we go back and we look at what happened with FDR, baiting them, knowing that they were going to attack, withholding information from people who could have done more to minimize casualties.
	Whenever we look at a situation like that, I still remember what my father did.
	And my mother, and what a difficult thing that was for them.
	They were married, even had a child.
	They would not have drafted him, but he signed up anyway.
	And, you know, even though FDR baited them, they still struck first.
	And it's always stuck with me, and we need to remember that when we talk about war.
	It is not justified, even if somebody baits you, it is still a day of infamy if you attack somebody preemptively.
	If you say, well, I know that there's going to be a war, I'm going to hit them first.
	Well, you just lost the moral high ground.
	Yeah, he tempted them, he baited them, but they took the bait.
	And we have been doing what the Japanese did ever since.
	Do we have Tony? Okay, good.
	good we got Tony. Alright we're gonna take a quick break and we're gonna connect with Tony and we'll be right back.
	The common man.
	They created common core and dumbed down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com you
	If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSRadio.com.
	All right, and joining us now is Tony Arterbin of Wise Wolf Gold and Silver, and Tony has set up davidknight.gold to take you there and let him know that you're coming through me.
	We've had Tony as a friend and a contributor and a supporter for a very, very long time.
	It's always a pleasure to have Tony on.
	Thanks for joining us, Tony. Thanks for having me back, David.
	Always good to see you. Well, it's been kind of interesting, isn't it?
	Everybody knew this was going to happen.
	It's no surprise, election year, whether they've got the rationale for it or not, they don't care.
	They will create a rationale, and so now they started talking about doing some Fed interest rate cuts, and it's having the anticipated effect, isn't it?
	Well, they're counting on the memory of the American people being very short, as it usually is.
	Gore Vidal said we were the United States of amnesia.
	I go back to, you know, what, two years ago, they were talking about, oh, this inflation is transitory.
	They used the word transitory, and now they've...
	Gone so far as to say we're at the terminal rate.
	I like that phraseology a lot better.
	But they didn't move interest rates, but they're hinting, and they are going to, you and I both know this, they're going to lower interest rates.
	It looks like somewhere around three times this year.
	But if you look a little further down the road, you know, in 2025, they're going to have to raise interest rates again, okay, because inflation is going to go completely out of control.
	The headlines across everything that I look at when I monitor precious metals is that gold hit its all-time high, which I think is something that's inevitable.
	It's not even surprising anymore.
	But what it should have said is that the dollar hit its all-time low.
	I think we need to start looking at it that way.
	The dollar is continuing to hit another all-time low, and commodities and precious metals, the prices are being reset globally.
	That's the big story here.
	That's the takeaway. But I think we're watching these interest rates.
	It's a sideshow, David.
	I mean, the interest rates are going to get lower.
	We're going to have a fake economy going into a fake election with fake politicians, just like we always do.
	Except the consequences, I think, with the dollar losing the world's reserve currency status, I think these are much more dire consequences than we've had in the past.
	I guess it's kind of like, you know, the old thing is the glass half empty or half full.
	I guess it depends on whether you're measuring the water or the air.
	You know, the dollar would be equivalent to measuring the air.
	The gold would be equivalent to the water, you know, the actual stuff.
	That's right. It's like the matrix with the little boy and the spoonbender.
	You have to remember that there is no spoon.
	It's kind of like there is no currency here.
	It's your imagination.
	Oh, man. And so, you know, just the rumor.
	Just the rumor of, well, we're going to have an interest rate cut maybe coming up this summer, maybe three months from now, maybe in June or whatever.
	So just the rumor of that sent the stock market up, sent gold up, sent crypto up.
	And what it did was, as you point out, it sent the dollar down.
	More so than thinking, well, everything went up except for the dollar, but what it did was when they said, well, we're going to devalue the dollar by doing this, and we all knew they were going to do it for the election.
	They're demanding that this be done.
	We've got Elizabeth Warren as well as Bernie Sanders, those two economic experts.
	Sending a demand letter with 19 Democrats from Congress telling them, you better lower the interest rates.
	They give every reason they can think of, and none of them valid, except for the fact that it's an election year.
	That's the key thing, isn't it?
	Well, I liked your analysis this morning at the beginning of the show.
	You're talking about this writing unlimited checks.
	There's no fiscal responsibility left.
	That's not in any of the vernacular coming out of Washington, D.C. or the political parties.
	We're not talking about that at all.
	It used to be a big issue.
	And if you notice, that's the dog that doesn't bark.
	Nobody talks about it anymore.
	I think we're watching this death of a currency.
	The looting of the Treasury.
	All bets are off.
	That's what we're watching.
	You're exactly right.
	The only thing that reigns in this out-of-control federal government The out-of-control, the Wall Street criminals, the only thing that reigns them in is the loss of the world's reserve currency, status of the dollar, this money velocity, where you can just go and continue to print without consequence.
	But the consequences are real.
	They affect real people in real time.
	And I think, you know, again, fake money, real consequences, and that's what we're watching play on, Dave.
	Oh, absolutely. And that's one of the reasons why you've got Russia and China moving with bricks and everything, because I understand that's our superpower.
	Our superpower is to be able to create money out of thin air.
	That's what real American exceptionalism is about.
	We've got a couple of questions here on Rockfin.
	Gordon Shumway says, gold is going to go to 3,000, silver to 90.
	When is the bubble going to burst?
	Well, you know, go back to 2020.
	That's a good question.
	For gold bugs and silver bugs like me, you know, I've been paying attention to this for years and years.
	And, you know, again, it's something that cannot go on forever will stop.
	That's Herbert Stein's law.
	Never underestimate how willing the powers that be are to devalue currency and to create new currency supply.
	We have a trillion new dollars in debt every 90 days now.
	It took us from 1776 to 1980 to go a trillion dollars in debt for the United States of America.
	Now it's every 90 days.
	So everything is accelerating.
	To make a call on when silver is going to break its all-time high, again, $52.50 in 1980 for silver.
	It did it close to that again in 2011.
	Gold came close to 2,000 or broke 2,000 in 2011.
	Again, Ben Bernanke came along and said, well, it calmed everybody down and said, we won't do the TARP funds again and the bailouts and the too big to fail.
	Don't worry about that.
	We're going to have a lot more fiscal responsibility and all that.
	It's going to tone everything down. And precious metals fell.
	And they fell for a while.
	And then again, 2020, gold breaks its all-time high.
	I was hosting your show down in Austin when it did on August, I believe, August 6th, 2020.
	But again, the ride from there has been strange because of all of this intervention and that it's a very powerful entity.
	And you've had, you know, I've had Stuart Englert on who wrote the book Rigged about the gold and silver markets, about how the bullion banks, the giant ones, work with the central bank because in the West, Fiat currency, not just the dollar, but fiat currency is at war with gold.
	So they have a vested interest in the price not going up, just like I said earlier.
	The gold's not at its all-time high.
	The dollar's at its all-time low.
	It's an inversion of how you should look at it.
	And so I don't know when these things are going to kick off, but I do know Citibank, going back to 2020, I have a memory.
	I go back, I remember all these projections.
	Even major banks were saying $3,000 gold, easy, within the next year.
	That was 2020. That didn't happen.
	I think we have a lot of delayed reactions.
	The best thing you can do right now is because supply is not as strong as you may think.
	Take it from somebody who's trying to source and supply.
	I've got close to 800 members right now for Wolfpack, so that's automatic.
	Every month we have 800 people that are doing the bulk buy-ins together, so I have to project two or three weeks out.
	It's not as strong as you may think.
	One or two whales in the silver market, there would be almost no supply.
	Wow. And that's how close we are to a revaluation here.
	So I would just, you know, if you're accumulating, you're stacking, keep doing that.
	If you can keep from selling, keep from selling.
	If you don't have to sell, don't sell.
	Of course, if you're going to sell, sell to me.
	I need supply. If you don't have to sell, don't sell.
	Because I think these prices are going to change.
	And again, is it going to go up?
	Well, I know that it's going to go up technically, and this isn't investment advice because the dollar is going to go down.
	Yeah, especially if you look at just the reaction, the rumor, you know, gets everything, you know, crypto, stock market, gold and everything, when they actually start to do it.
	And I know they say, you know, buy it on the rumor and sell it on when it actually happens, but it's going to happen multiple times.
	And I think, you know, as you point out, it's going to be probably...
	Three times is what the rumors are now.
	It'll happen more than once.
	And so they'll still be going up with that.
	It wouldn't surprise me either, David, if gold fell way below $2,000.
	And the reason being is because if you look at history, look at what happened in the first quarter of 2020 when you had the highest stock market since 1929 and the lowest.
	It was in the same week.
	You know, this huge dip.
	And gold went to like $1,100 an ounce or something like that.
	No one could find it for that, but in the same thing, silver went to some crazy number like $13 an ounce or $12 an ounce.
	I just looked up, and when you and I did my first interview with you, Gold was at $1,425 an ounce.
	I looked that up this morning. We're far away from that.
	But again, can it come back down in short periods?
	Sure it can, because it can follow the markets.
	And you've got to understand how much paper gold there is.
	To understand that, because you and I don't think like we're embezzlers, but there's a huge amount of that where it's just not real.
	And so that follows the market.
	There's a lot of those trades that go on.
	But you know what's interesting? Something happening at the same time gold is hitting another all-time high or the dollar is all-time low.
	But this huge phenomenon with Bitcoin, and there was billions and billions being taken out of the gold that are flowing out of gold ETFs.
	At least hundreds of millions. And it's going into the Bitcoin ETFs.
	And supposedly, all these analysts were saying that the gold price was going to go down.
	It's not going down.
	Because the central bank, it's too big.
	You're talking about a massive shift away from a currency.
	And I don't think these analysts, I don't think they fully appreciate the historical gravity of what's happening.
	Yeah, and that's the thing that makes me really antsy about all that is the ETFs, because of what I know about paper gold and paper silver and how they can use that to manipulate things, because of what I saw with the real estate derivatives and all the rest of the stuff, when they start creating these ETF things, you know, it just, to me, it looks like NFTs.
	So it's like, is this thing for real or are they just using this as a tool to manipulate?
	And that's another question we've got here.
	This is from Michelle Obama.
	Thank you for the tip. Can you ask Tony about BlackRock's tokenization of all assets?
	And, of course, they've just given an Ethereum-backed digital liquidity fund $100 million.
	Again, you know, even along with BlackRock and creating these digital assets and...
	You've got Ethereum, which there's a lot of talk, and it has been talk for a while, that maybe when they introduce CBDC, they might do it.
	If they do it really quickly, they could piggyback it on top of Ethereum.
	That really seems to be the inside track.
	Everybody in the public likes Bitcoin, but the system seems to be shifting people towards Ethereum.
	I don't know enough about the crypto, but what do you think, Tony?
	What's going on with BlackRock?
	I read that yesterday.
	It's very troublesome. And I've been asking this same question since the launch of these ETFs.
	And you had Larry Fink from BlackRock raising Bitcoin, talking about digital gold and stores of value.
	And I just started looking around and said, is anybody else noticing this?
	You have this, the bankster, at least the face of one that you can see, talking about how there's validity in cryptocurrency.
	I guess color me skeptical.
	I don't believe these people.
	I don't think that their intent...
	Because you know Larry Fink has also said about changing behavior of people using ESG to do that.
	And of course there are also major buyers of residential real estate in the United States.
	You've got to ask yourself why that is as well.
	To change behavior.
	This is what banksters do.
	You go back to the funding of the Bolshevik Revolution or The revolution in China with Mao in 1949 is backed by the world's richest people.
	So I'm skeptical.
	I don't like it when, again, the crypto market didn't need your intervention.
	As a matter of fact, the whole purpose of crypto was to move away From a dying system that's corrupt and that is not free market.
	And there's a lot of problems with the crypto market, with the meme coins and everything else.
	And I agree with you with Ethereum.
	The thing that Bitcoin's different because Bitcoin has no company.
	Nobody knows who Satoshi Nakamoto was, or if it's a person or a group of people, nobody really knows, and it's an open question.
	But it has no centralized company, no country, where every other crypto, like it or not, traces back to someone, because it's open source.
	There's an initial coin offering.
	You know who it is. So Bitcoin is different in that way.
	And again, you can still be skeptical, but there's something with that.
	Yeah, they're not going to run the CBDC off the back of Bitcoin.
	I don't see that happening, but it would be one of these other coins.
	And I remember Ethereum, it was trading, it was...
	It's 10 times what it was when I started trading it.
	I used to sometimes offer Ethereum.
	I've pretty much gone down to just Bitcoin for right now, just trying to see what happens in this market if I do any kind of trades through the shop.
	But yeah, you'd be very skeptical of that.
	Whenever BlackRock or Vanguard or any of these majors are touching cryptocurrency and trying to drag it into the old system, I think it's a red flag.
	Even Max Keiser, he's talking about how the people that buy the ETFs are going to lose out.
	If you're going to own Bitcoin, go get it yourself.
	Your keys are important.
	It's just like physical gold.
	If you're going to buy gold ETFs, all you're buying really is a stake in a spot price.
	You're not really actually buying gold.
	You should always think about the counterparty risk to anything, whether it's crypto or gold.
	That's right. And whenever you see these, again, these derivatives or ETFs or the involvement of companies like BlackRock and JP Morgan who are always poo-pooing, you know, cryptocurrencies, when you see that happening, you know, it's kind of like the old thing, they've got to get behind you before they can stab you in the back.
	When these big companies start to buy into something, it's like, oh, good, now they're an investor like me.
	No, they're getting into it so they can manipulate this thing.
	Because if they can manipulate it and crash it, they've still got lots more money they can put in and ride this thing up.
	That's the whole point. They don't want things going horizontal.
	They want a roller coaster ride, right?
	Dip and then straight up with a rise and all the rest of the stuff.
	And so to me, that's a big warning when you've got big institutions coming in and you've got derivative instruments that they're inventing and creating for the first time.
	To me, that's a real scary thing.
	We We've got another question for you.
	This is off of Rumble.
	Atomic Dog says, David, in four years, almost to the day, gold is now up 33.2%, 25% last three, 14% the last two years.
	I would accept that as real inflation that we have seen over the last four years.
	Would Tony agree? Absolutely.
	Yeah. I think that's more into it.
	Watch commodities. Even though they're manipulated, and I think that's probably just the tip of the iceberg.
	If you really follow the amount of currency creation, the actual expansion of the money supply, the inflation is much worse.
	And you find it in food and other things, because a lot of these other products, and we talked about this before, they're saying, oh, well, there's prices are stabilizing or they've gone down.
	That's because there's no demand. You're talking about luxury items or electronics and things that people can do without or they can use an older model.
	But the real inflation is in the grocery store.
	That's where you go find the real cost of what they've done in the last five years.
	That's right. Yeah, and when you look at it again, you know, whenever you look at a trend line with something, you're going to see the stuff jumping all around and then they draw the line through it because there's a lot of noise that's there.
	And that's this kind of day-to-day variation or month-to-month variation.
	But over a period of time, you can see that.
	And you and I have talked about this for the longest time.
	How over a century or longer you can see that the value of gold stays there along with the value of other things that you buy with a custom suit or travel or things like that.
	Some of those have been helped by efficiencies of manufacturing or other things like that.
	But for the most part, it stays there.
	Not so with these fiat currencies.
	So that's a key thing.
	You know, one of the things that we're seeing also is the fact that Liz Warren and others, always Liz Warren, she's always presenting herself as a champion of a little guy when she's really...
	wealth tax. I don't know if you saw this or not, but it will only apply to the ultra-rich, so you and I don't have to worry about this, right? But just like the income tax, you know, that only applied to the ultra-ultra-rich, and it was a very small tax initially for the ultra-ultra-rich, but we know what happened to that. Now they're pushing this out there to confiscate money, and the other part of it is they know that's going to drive people out of the country, so then they have to, on the back end of it, put a big penalty for anybody that leaves the country.
	This is another sign of desperation and the fact that they're never going to leave people alone, isn't it?
	Well, again, go back to 1913.
	You go back to the 16th Amendment.
	This was brought to you by the world's richest people.
	They indemnified themselves.
	They built their foundations, and then they said, oh, no, no, no.
	This is just for the ultra-rich.
	It's just for the top.
	Well, it wasn't. It's supposed to trickle down, and it's supposed to affect all of their competition.
	Elizabeth Warren is a stooge.
	For international banking.
	That's what she is. I mean, she's not...
	Where's the grassroots enthusiasm for Elizabeth Warren?
	I remember when she... This was back in, you know, 2019 at the primary, and she was running, and I was having my radio show one day, and I said, I think she's got the it factor, though, you know, like the clown it, like in the sewer.
	I think she's definitely got the it factors.
	That's when she had the commercials.
	She's like, I'm going to go get a beer out of the refrigerator.
	And you're thinking, is this person...
	Is this animatronics?
	Yeah. Did she escape from Chuck E. Cheese?
	There's something wrong with her.
	And she's always, you know, portraying herself as, well, other than being, you know, Pocahontas and all the rest of that.
	She's portraying herself as the little guy.
	You know, I'm for the little guy.
	I'm sticking up for the working class and the teachers and all that.
	And you look at how adamant she is about, I mean, boy, she has a true hatred of crypto and, you know, pushing all this other stuff.
	You know that she's there for the big banks.
	You know, she's aligned with them in her interest precisely, and yet continuing to tell people, oh, I'm there for the little guys.
	The consumer, and I always get the...
	Word order out, but this Consumer Financial Protection Board that she created, what they did was that drove a lot of small and medium-sized banks out of business.
	It didn't protect any consumers at all.
	It just drove small and medium-sized banks out of business that were the competitors of her bosses.
	It's always the goal. She is a mouthpiece for international banking and multinational corporations, period.
	That's all she is. They're speaking through her.
	Those who oppose the free market of crypto, it's the high-galian dialectic too, David.
	It's like, oh, well, we need to regulate these.
	Well, what we need to do is we create an ETF. And we'll let BlackRock regulate it.
	We'll let the majors and the banks will regulate it.
	We'll go through them. It's a poison pill.
	That's the way they do it.
	It's either going to outlaw it or we'll make it go through this system.
	Again, it's so transparent if you're looking at it.
	If you're looking at history, to know that these people actually are.
	I wonder how the staffer that she had that came out and it was all for the Bitcoin ETFs.
	I don't know if you remember that.
	Somebody got in and hacked or a staffer maybe on their way out.
	I hope they're okay. I don't know where.
	I can send flowers somewhere or whatever happened to that staffer.
	But somebody came out on her Twitter and was endorsing Bitcoin.
	Well, you know, when you look at this and the origins of this, and you compare it to the beginning and the origin of the income tax and the rates that were there, that was like, I think, a 1% tax, and you had to be like a, you know, I forget the level, but it was like a multi-billionaire today.
	She's starting out at something that's even higher than that to begin with and we all know that it's going to migrate As the income tax did to the middle class, but they're starting out with a two percent tax on anybody That's got a net worth between 50 million and a billion if you're over a billion it goes to three percent And they put this in and they sell it to people based on people's envy. It's like oh, yeah Why i'm nowhere close to 50 million?
	So I you know, yeah, those people should pay their fair share and so forth and so on knowing That these people have an army of accountants and they're not going to pay any taxes no matter what elizabeth warren does They're going to find some way out of it or they'll buy some politicians to put a couple of loopholes in specifically and they'll jump through those loopholes.
	But the thing that concerns me That just doesn't have any attention anymore from the Republicans is this army of IRS agents.
	In fact, they're going to make this thing not even five times bigger.
	You know, you had Kevin McCarthy say, well, let's not make it nine times bigger.
	Let's only make it five times bigger, whatever.
	I'm sorry, seven times bigger.
	Let's make it five times bigger.
	And now you got Johnson, who's back up to making it as big as Biden and Pelosi wanted it in the first place, up to seven times bigger.
	Nobody is talking about that.
	And that along with their continual push to say that they want to...
	That one of their key duties is to have CBDC. That's the stuff that really concerns me, this digitization.
	And so, you know, we've talked about the value and the imploding value.
	I think the value of the dollar that will implode.
	But the thing that concerns me even more than that is having something that is going to be private, that's going to be physical.
	as Catherine Austin Fitts points out, having financial, private financial transactions.
	And that's the thing that makes me want to get out of digital and get into physical.
	That's the key thing that I'm looking for. JPMorgan, Visa, joining MasterCard and so many others talking about how they're going to do biometric scanning, facial recognition, contactless payment. They want to start with grocery stores. They want to start with entertainment venues.
	That's what they focused on, those too.
	And I thought, yeah, bread and circuses.
	That's what they want to get everybody.
	You're going to have to have a digital currency and biometric ID in order to get bread or circuses.
	They want to use those choke points on people.
	Oh, the only thing new under the sun is the history you don't know.
	That's right. To quote Harry Truman, thinking about Shakespeare, when troubles come, they don't come in single spies but in battalions.
	All these things that are coming down, the CBDC. Battalions of IRS. What's that?
	Battalions of IRS, yeah.
	Battalions of 87,000 IRS agents.
	The new regulations. Having to use your biometrics.
	They're creating a trap for all of us.
	Anybody who remembers what it was like To live in what is semblance, at least I consciously accepted it as a free country.
	I don't know what I'm in anymore.
	I'm in some sort of economy sector in the new world order.
	That's what I feel like. No longer in what I feel like was, you know, my beloved republic that I love so much.
	And I think this is what we're having to endure.
	It's multi-pronged.
	But at the same time, again, we're not trying to fix that old system.
	We're just building new ones.
	That's the, you know, our Buckminster Fuller talked about that.
	And, you know, he's long since died in the early 80s, but he was a futurist and a genius.
	And he talked about having, you know, when you see something, the old system, don't try to go yell at it or try to prop it back up or whatever, fix it from the inside.
	Just build a new thing. And I think there's a lot of innovation.
	There's good things going on at the same time, but we need to be aware of the problems.
	Definitely, you and I talk about them every week.
	We definitely know they're coming.
	We were way ahead of even mainstream or even have conservatives now.
	I'm going to do the conservatives. You have people talking about CBDC. Yeah.
	both major candidates in the race going into 2024. We know their history with CBDC, whether it's Trump with Jared Kushner or Biden and again, these are, they have the same donors, they have the same plans. It may come in different forms, but CBDC is coming.
	So I think just knowing that you talk about being outside of this system, whether it's, you know, physical gold and silver, you know, having that in your hand, you know, having an ability to access physical metals like Like, you know, David, if you and I want to do, if I want to buy a tractor from you, and I, you know, I go down to Tennessee and I want to buy a tractor from you or whatever, and I give you a few gold coins, where's the bank in that?
	Where's the, who knows about, you and I know, and I've got value for value, and we walk away.
	That's right. And that's a major fear to the powers that be.
	That's why they want to kill cash.
	That's right. There's been a war on cash.
	I promise you that.
	The physical thing is the key.
	Physical thing. Physical and anonymous, that's really the key.
	And that's a very, very important thing to prepare for.
	Absolutely. Talk a little bit about the IRAs.
	You said that you had somebody ask you a question about how to do a metal IRA. Yeah, one of your listeners called me yesterday and just said, you know, it would be great if you and Dave would take just a few minutes to explain that.
	He goes, there's probably hundreds of people like me that want to know, because you mention it, but you don't ever explain how it works.
	Well, and I appreciate the question.
	I've been doing these, when I first set up my shop, I wanted to be a little bit...
	Smaller shops generally don't offer IRAs.
	That's usually your big 1-800 number places, and they do a lot of the bigger transactions.
	So I decided I'll get into this.
	I'll get my tone and figure out how to do it.
	And we did. We have a company that we partnered with through the trading floor in Dallas called New Direction Trust.
	So they handle all the legal, you know, set up your IRA, all the paperwork, all the docs, make sure everything's great.
	Once you set that at $50, you go to New Direction Trust's website, you set up an account, deposit $50 in there, and then you've got a precious metals IRA. If you have an existing IRA or a 401k, you can, without penalty, roll that in.
	All those funds that are sitting in the fiat market We're good to go.
	It's your metals. I mean, it's going to, you pick, if you want Canadian Maple Leafs, those are your Canadian Maple Leafs.
	You know, if you're American Eagles, it's your American Eagles.
	And you own those, they have to go into a third-party vault.
	Again, not in the bank.
	It has nothing to do, it's not inside.
	The cool thing about the precious metals IRAs, And why I endorse them is because at least it's the first step removed.
	There's no bank. There's no bank.
	It's not under that regulation.
	So those are going to go into third-party storage vaults.
	I use Dallas, and that's just me personally.
	But there's all over the United States.
	They've got them in Nevada, Idaho.
	They've got them in Delaware.
	So they're all over the place.
	I think there's 10 major vaults you can choose from.
	Storage is about $180 a year.
	So if you've got...
	You know, fiat funds in the market and you're interested, it's a very easy process.
	You can go to davidknight.gold.
	You can contact us. I can show you how.
	It's just literally a new direction.
	Once you open an account with them, they will help you get any existing funds over there.
	And we get the process done in a couple of weeks.
	And then you've got metals stored.
	And again, you'll start to see, and I had a lady that approached me When I was in Arcapulco.
	And she said, will you please take a look at my precious metals IRA? And I spent some time with her.
	And I had to tell her, unfortunately, you used a dealer that oversold you in some numismatic stuff.
	Even that happens in IRAs.
	They just overcharged her.
	So you've got to be careful with those, because a lot of these 1-800 numbers, they're going to put you in some collectibles, and even though you've got the metals, but what you've got to look at is your melt value.
	So if you, let's say you gave me $10,000, and I'm going to have to, you know, I'm going to have to, there's premiums on physical metals, whether I like it or not.
	I can't buy things at spot.
	So there's going to be some premium there.
	But your melt value is going to be, you know, how many ounces to spot that you have.
	And I try to make that number as large as possible because I don't want people to say, well, I got ripped off.
	And this lady, unfortunately, it's like more than 50% of her deposit was put into numismatic blue sky, you know, just ethereal cost.
	When really what you're looking for is the melt because that's with your absolute rock bottom.
	So we try to do that at Wise Wolf.
	I'm very, very cognizant of, you know...
	People have worked very hard to save up what they have in these fiat markets.
	You'll take a little bit of a hit because it won't be dollar for dollar.
	But you're still going to have gold, physical gold, physical silver, even physical platinum if you want to do that in a tax-free shelter, which is that's really what it is, and it's outside of the banking system.
	That's great. So you just basically, once you set up the new Dimension account, and then you tell your current IRA to roll this stuff over to them, once they get it, they contact you, and you contact the user and find out what kind of mix you want to put into your metal IRA. So it's a pretty simple process.
	Yeah, and the first thing I do if I'm talking to somebody, whether it's the IRA or anything else, David, I don't know if anybody else, I pull up my competition.
	And I said, this is what the competition's charging for X, Y, and Z, and this is what I can do.
	So we generally try to save you a bit, at least be transparent enough so you know what you're buying.
	That's great. Yeah, it's an easy process.
	Once you have it in there, we can get your medals in there in a few days.
	That's great. Let's talk about one more thing before I let you go, if you've got the time, your network that you're setting up.
	Tell people a little bit about that, where that is, and we're going to be there eventually.
	Well, yeah, we've got Jason Barker is an ambassador for us now, and Melissa's been helping.
	We've got FreeWorld.fm is the network.
	Billy Ray Valentine and myself have been working on that for about a year and a half, or maybe two years now.
	Time flies when you're in the apocalypse.
	We definitely...
	We talked a lot about having a lifeboat for free speech, something that's, you know, I'm building the infrastructure so we can eventually have our own servers and other things like that, have our own app.
	And it's audio only, but it's freeworld.fm.
	It's a 24-hour station.
	You have some great hosts over there like Jason Barker, Angry Tiger.
	Guard is up and running.
	I do my show there and many, many others.
	You have a slot there.
	We want to bring you over. We just need to get your software hooked up, and that's pretty much the last step.
	And, of course, you and I, we can talk off-air, too, because I have some other ideas I want to run past you.
	But it's for the people.
	We've got a chat there. I think it's pretty active.
	We're looking forward to being there.
	I want to be there because, again, as you said, we're going to have a lifeboat for free speech.
	It's getting rapidly worse, very rapidly worse.
	People getting now jail sentences for free speech.
	I think we're going to see that after this next election.
	They may even do it before in the name of making the election more honest.
	They may shut down speech because we want to have an honest election.
	You certainly don't want to have a debate, right?
	So, we'll be there, and we'll get this together, and probably it's taking us a while to get this stuff together, but we want to do that, and we'll be there.
	Freeworld.fm.
	Good to know that you're putting that up, and thank you so much, Tony, for supporting us with DavidKnight.Gold.
	We really do appreciate it. Thank you.
	Thank you, Dave. All right, folks, we're going to take a really quick break, and we will be right back.
	Looking for better information?
	APSRadioNews.com features articles and commentary, along with audio from all the top news from around the world.
	at KCSRadioNews.com.
	♪♪♪ ♪♪♪ Thank you for watching!
	I hope you enjoyed this video!
	If you enjoyed this video, please subscribe!
	Thank you for watching!
	Thank you for watching!
	I completely forgot that mine was aware of the fact that it is vulnerable and therefore
	it is vulnerable.
	I completely forgot.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, we were just talking about free speech with Tony and him setting up FreeWorld.fm.
	So let's talk a little bit about free speech.
	Before we do, real quickly on Rockfin, thank you very much, Sean E. I appreciate the tip.
	That is very kind. I appreciate that.
	Yeah, you had Bill Maurer and John Cleese.
	Talking about the New York Times, because, you know, there are a couple of comedians, and the New York Times is now a complete joke.
	They repeatedly, rather, blasted the New York Times and other publications.
	I was going to talk about this yesterday.
	I didn't get around to it, but I mentioned yesterday the fact that USA Today, owned by Gannett Services, said, well, we're going to drop the Associated Press.
	Not necessarily because the Associated Press is just government-associated propaganda.
	That's really what the AP stands for, should stand for.
	But mainly because of money.
	You know, they're circling the drain as well, like so many of these different publications are.
	Because people don't trust them.
	It's just that simple. I mean, we should start lying to people, and it becomes obvious.
	It's so funny that they think that they're not going to be discovered.
	That's how low their opinion is of you.
	They think that they can lie to you over and over again, and you'll never figure it out.
	So Bill Maurer and John Cleese touring the New York Times.
	They said it's no longer the great newspaper that they once read, as Gerald Slenty always calls it, the toilet paper of record.
	And that's what John Cleese said.
	They used to call it the newspaper record.
	He didn't say toilet paper record.
	That's what Gerald Slenty says.
	But of course, we've mocked these people I know have mocked these local publications for the longest time.
	In Raleigh, where we used to live, they had a paper.
	The paper was The News and Observer.
	We always called it The Noise and Disturber.
	In Atlanta, they had The Journal and Constitution.
	We called it The Urinal and Constipation.
	One of my friends got a cold call from the News and Observer there in Raleigh, and they said they were trying to sell subscriptions to their newspaper.
	And he just said, I'm sorry, I'm not housebreaking any pets right now.
	I said, what? It went for a while before they kind of caught on, you know.
	He says, well, that's the only use I would have for your paper.
	So they said, the Times has recently published things featuring young people saying the dumbest stuff, said John Maurer, telling John Cleese.
	He said, we are so, well, he put it, let's just say, so messed up.
	That's what he said. And he said, then they print this stuff in the New York Times.
	Well, I used to think that was a great newspaper, but I don't anymore, said John Cleese.
	Yeah, it was, said Bill Maher.
	Maher said, what is annoying about it is that it's not just, just give me the facts.
	There's way too much editorializing on the front page.
	The way the articles that are just supposed to be the fact kind of articles are slanted one way.
	And I'm not even necessarily for the other side.
	I just want someone to tell me the whole truth and not just like your version of it.
	Because you can lie by what you admit.
	And both sides do it.
	That's an interesting thing.
	I mean, you'll never have a completely, I've said this many times, you'll never have a completely objective news source.
	There will always be an inherent bias in it.
	Just take a look at Matt Drudge.
	He used to always be putting out information from conservatives.
	Now it's the other way around.
	And the stories that he picks, he doesn't write anything, but the stories that he picks to talk about and the angles in which these stories are coming from is a kind of editorializing.
	And he's an editor, essentially.
	And that's what happens in these papers.
	So everybody's got a bias.
	And that's why I've never liked news sources like the New York Times or the Washington Post or Newsweek or Time or any of them, because they have this conceit.
	I don't know if they believe it.
	I don't know if their readers believe it, but they have this conceit that they are presenting you balanced, objective facts.
	Now, they can try to be balanced.
	But they're still going to have their own bias in it.
	I would much rather have an opinion piece.
	Like I've said many times when I was in college, I would get things from the right, I'd get things from the left, because they sound alike.
	And I actually did read both the left, the nation, and the right, National Review.
	But of course, you know, both of them were...
	I also had a lot of hooks in there from the establishment as well.
	But still, I would rather get somebody that's up front about being an opinion piece and telling me why they believe it.
	You know, give me the facts, discuss the facts.
	You can still do that in an honest way and you can still advocate for your side.
	But when they slant it and tell you that I'm objective, that's the thing that I object to.
	So, Cleese says, yeah, both sides are doing this.
	He said, the hard thing now is getting any reliable information.
	Well, it's going to continue to get harder and harder because they're getting more and more bold with their upfront censorship.
	As a matter of fact, when you look at how stupid it is, this article here from the New York Times, actual headline, the New York Times says, it turns out the deep state is actually kind of awesome.
	It's just kind of stupid cheerleading that you see here.
	And this is reported by Information Liberation.
	It's actually kind of awesome.
	The deep state are, quote, the unsung heroes making our country great.
	As Information Liberation says, the piece is embarrassingly stupid, even for the New York Times now and the joke that they have become.
	Elon Musk says, is accused by Oliver Darcy of all these people.
	Oliver Darcy. He was the one who was really at the cutting edge of censorship.
	He was all over Alex and InfoWars when they got openly censored in the beginning of August of 2018.
	Oliver Darcy.
	And this is now Oliver Darcy coming after Elon Musk.
	And I think it is amazing and very telling What he says there at CNN, radicalized by the right, Elon Musk puts his conspiratorial thinking on display for the world to see.
	Well, you know, the world sees what Oliver Darcy is doing and what CNN is doing.
	All of the world sees what the CIA, the FBI, and these people who accuse everybody of being a conspiracy theorist, we see what they're doing.
	As I just pointed out early in the show, it goes back to them trying to cover up an absurd or trying to defend an absurd narrative and shut down anybody else who questions it.
	That's where they invented the conspiracy theorist for.
	Now it's still being weaponized by people of the ilk of Oliver Darcy.
	And so he accuses Elon Musk of now having been radicalized.
	Here's what he has to say. In the contentious interview with Don Lemon...
	Musk equated moderating dangerous and appalling hate speech to censorship.
	Yes. Yes.
	It's either free or it isn't.
	If you're going to censor things that you think are hateful, well, you're the censor and you get to decide what is nice speech and what isn't.
	So he equated moderating dangerous and appalling speech to censorship, says Oliver Darcy, with a straight face.
	He bashed the press for legitimate reporting.
	He assailed DEI programs without supporting evidence.
	We all know what they're about.
	He doesn't have to go back and redefine DEI. That's been in public conversation for a long time.
	He skewered advertisers who fled X platform last year and yet again gave credence to the racist great replacement theory, among other things.
	See, Oliver Darcy doesn't defend any of these things with any, as he would put it, supporting evidence.
	He has no supporting evidence to tell us how DEI programs are good, how they've worked.
	Give me some supporting evidence to tell me that this isn't a great replacement.
	Tell me that if you're going to take down speech, that's not censorship.
	That's exactly what it is.
	He says, to those who are not fluent in the intricacies of right-wing media, some of what Musk said may have sounded bizarre or even foreign.
	But in the right-wing fever swamps, where Musk is now deeply entrenched, these are the issues that animate the masses.
	You know, those low people who are not nearly as smart as Oliver Darcy and Don Lemon.
	Yeah, who are those elitist, arrogant people who think they're so smart.
	And that was the key thing when you look at the way Don Lemon was pushing Elon Musk.
	And I'm not a supporter of Elon Musk by any means.
	I support free speech.
	But what Don Lemon was, he was trying to do tabloid type of stuff.
	So tell me about your drug usage.
	But really hating the fact that That Elon Musk would say that he supports free speech, whether he does or not.
	He says, the erratic businessman raged against the, quote, woke mind virus, unquote, and said that the goal is the destruction of America.
	He called NPR a nice version of Pravda.
	He alleged that Google manipulates their search results with left-wing bias.
	He said, he argued that if there's not a red wave in November, that America is doomed.
	Well, I think America is...
	I think America's doomed even with a red wave when we look at what these people have done in the past and what they...
	If they even identify the correct problems, they won't do anything about it if they get elected.
	At this juncture, calling Musk a right-wing...
	Excrement poster is no longer provocative.
	It is simply accurate.
	And his ugly behavior is even more troubling because of the fact that Musk is enormously influential.
	No, what is scary is the fact that Oliver Darcy is listened to.
	I don't want Oliver Darcy forcibly removed.
	I think he should be ignored, however, by anybody who's got half a brain.
	By the way, Tony asked if I would tell people he'll be live right after this program, 12 noon Eastern Time, and he will be on Rockfin as well as on FreeWorld.fm.
	So look for Tony right after this program ends.
	We usually mention that while he's here, and we both forgot to say that.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	And we're going to come back and take a look at what is happening to our society because things are moving in a very totalitarian way in many different aspects.
	Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
	From country to blues, classic hits to news, APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
	Get details at APSradio.com.
	This is a test.
	you you You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, there is a big rise, according to a recent poll, big rise in the number of Americans who think that religious beliefs are at odds with mainstream culture.
	Well, that's pretty obvious, isn't it?
	I guess being fired, being canceled, being vilified isn't enough for everybody to wake up.
	only about half of the people say there's either a great deal or some conflict in this area.
	So it's 48% up from 42% in 2020, according to Pew Research.
	Only 18% of the people think that faith is gaining ground.
	In other findings, Americans' political affiliations had an impact on their view of religion and public life.
	Republicans and those leaning toward the GOP, 51% of them, said they believe it's important to have a president with the same religious beliefs that they hold.
	Just 25% of Democrats said the same thing.
	When you look at these people who support Trump and support him from the pulpit, it truly is amazing to me.
	Because he's so...
	We know what he's about. And only 13% say they believe Biden is very religious.
	And it's even lower for Trump.
	4%. 4%.
	But, of course, everybody is very religious.
	The only question is, what religion are you following?
	You know, everybody is worshiping something, aren't they?
	Money, power, sex, family.
	Oh, yeah. See, I mentioned family there because it can be a good thing that you make too much of.
	You know, there's nothing wrong with money.
	It's the love of money that's the root of all evil.
	You know, money can be used for good purposes.
	The same thing with power. The same thing with sex.
	The same thing with family. But anything can become an idol.
	Anything can be used that way.
	And anything like that can essentially become your religion.
	And, you know, we look at these candidates.
	It seems like power, money, and sex have become the centerpiece of their lives, doesn't it?
	A big warning sign for us.
	And yet, when you look at the World Health Organization, they just fired a transgender activist who said that puberty blockers should be the default option for children.
	Everybody should get it.
	I guess it'd be something like an MMR injection.
	So you get your MMR injection for your kids, and then you take them down to the next station, and they get their puberty blockers?
	Is that what this guy had in mind?
	He is a guy who calls himself Florence.
	He's an assistant professor at the University of Alberta College of Law.
	And he's got his special pronouns.
	He served as the first openly transfeminine, that's what they called it, law clerk at the Supreme Court of Canada.
	And he argued in a 2019 paper for Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry that, quote, puberty blockers ought to be treated as the default option for children instead of letting puberty run its course, he said.
	The thing is, he has no medical background.
	I don't know why he was writing papers for a psychological publication.
	But a lot of people picked up on this when they saw him there at the World Health Organization.
	Isn't it interesting how we can strain at gnats like this and swallow the camel whole?
	Because the World Health Organization, the entire thing, is a camel.
	And the Daily Mail pointed out that actually this guy has no medical background.
	Well, the same thing is true of the guy who runs the place, Tedros.
	Tedros is a Marxist politician running the World Health Organization.
	The entire thing needs to be shut down and defunded from our side.
	If they want to have it, let Bill Gates pay for the entire amount.
	When we look at St. Patrick's Day this last Sunday, we had pro-lifers excluded from From the St.
	Patrick's Day Parade in New York City.
	It is huge.
	I was there one year for it, and actually it was kind of crazy.
	There were so many people on the street.
	I've never been in a crowd like that before.
	Karen and I got separated, you know?
	We were kind of next to each other, but she got caught.
	the people were like a stream, a couple of different streams, and it was split.
	And so one stream started going one direction, the other one started going the other direction, and we got on separate ones, and they just started tearing, taking us apart, and it's like, started yelling, we're gonna meet each other eventually to try to get caught up again.
	But it's absolutely enormous.
	And they have banned people who are Irish and pro-life.
	So what they did was they set up some signs on the side along Fifth Avenue to talk about being pro-life.
	The presence on the sidelines...
	Was a consequence of a decision by the parade organizers to exclude pro-life groups who would be marching under their own banners.
	Is this bigoted?
	What do you call it when they're so intolerant of one side or the other?
	These are the people who are demanding that they have a choice.
	Well, these people are out there trying to help them make that decision.
	Give them some true information, and yet they want to shut them down.
	Once again, we're shocked and bewildered as to why parade organizers do not allow a pro-life group.
	Well, it is New York.
	A parade honoring the patron saint of Ireland and the patron saint of the Archdiocese of New York.
	They said, no, you're not going to allow you there, even though your position is more consistent and We hope the Irish government is paying attention, they said.
	Friends of Ireland and the Irish diaspora in America are sending a clear message in defense of the most vulnerable in our society.
	Among the variety of pro-life signs held aloft there was one that said, Ireland's 10,000 abortions in 2023.
	Why are we aborting our future?
	And that happened because they made abortion legal.
	And then they promptly killed 10,000 kids.
	It had always been illegal.
	And then this last week, we had an interesting case.
	We had the progressives there.
	They had a progressive prime minister, radical progressive prime minister.
	He put it to a vote that they would change the constitution to push back against the family, to push back against mothers.
	It honored them in the Constitution to talk about the valuable contribution that a mother makes, not just to her family, but to society.
	They wanted to shut that down.
	They truly do. I mean, this is amazing where we are.
	You know, we always hear about, well, you know, we're going to run the flag up and salute mom and apple pie when you run for office.
	Well, not anymore. Now they're going to try to destroy mom.
	And so Ireland soundly rejected that.
	And now we had this week, this progressive prime minister has now resigned.
	The one who championed the anti-life, anti-family, anti-mom stuff has now resigned.
	So I guess you could say that around St.
	Patrick's Day this year, they were casting the snakes out of Ireland yet again.
	Or maybe casting out the progs.
	They had a plague of progs, of progressives, and they cast them out, at least cast them out of the government, if not out of the country.
	Lala Harris, meanwhile, is doing her tour of abortion clinics, and she has gone to more than one.
	We've never had a president or a vice president go to an abortion clinic to honor them.
	But Lala Harris is doing it.
	Some people are calling it morally repugnant, evil.
	She visited it and said it is only right and fair that people have access to health care that they need.
	Well, she's saying that about hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, other things like that.
	She cares about your informed consent?
	Did she care? Did she say anything about my body, my choice when it was the vaccines and all this pandemic stuff?
	Absolutely not. That's the amazing hypocrisy.
	And I don't even see every article that I see from a pro-life organization ought to mention that up front at the very beginning.
	But they don't. It's not even mentioned anywhere in this article.
	You know, you go to LifeSite News, you go to Christian Post or any of these things.
	They don't talk about their absolute lies and hypocrisies.
	When it comes to taking a vaccine, that is your body.
	That is your choice. When it comes to an abortion, that is not your body.
	That is somebody else.
	And so they don't want you to have access to health care, other than the MacGuffin that you've got to have, and to have access to health care in an environment where they're treated with dignity and respect.
	You don't take this jab seriously.
	Oh, you're evil.
	You know, you're a sociopath.
	You're going to kill us all.
	You're fired. You can't come to school.
	You can't travel. You can't go anywhere, do anything.
	Boy, I tell you what, it is truly amazing.
	All of that, all of that was denied during the so-called COVID pandemic.
	Many of you in this chamber, my predecessor, are promising to pass a national ban on reproductive freedom, said Biden with his State of the Union.
	And then he said, my God, what freedoms will you take away next?
	Who is your God, Biden?
	Who is your God?
	Is it Moloch?
	Seems to be. His God is not Christ, that's for sure.
	What will you take away next?
	Isn't that an interesting question to come from somebody like Biden?
	What will you take away next?
	Because now he's moved on from the mandatory vaccines and the coercion and the canceling and the firing of people.
	Now he's moved on from taking away our freedoms to breathe, to make our own health care choices.
	Now he's trying to take away our freedom to drive.
	Our freedom to choose what kind of car we have, what kind of stove we use, what kind of air conditioning and heat, what kind of food we eat.
	He's after every one of our freedoms.
	So for him to say, what freedoms will you take away next?
	He is the most anti-choice, anti-freedom president that we've ever had.
	Constantly taking things away from us.
	Now, Trump has talked about abortion yet again, and we know that Yes, people got very excited.
	Lala Harris, the first vice president to go visit abortion clinics.
	Trump was the first president to actually attend and speak at a pro-life, a march for life that they would have at the anniversary of Roe v.
	Wade. He put some Supreme Court justices in who, surprise, surprise, said, we are going to strike down Roe v.
	Wade. It's a violation of the 10th Amendment.
	And then... I guess he was winning too much, and so he decided that pro-life laws that protect a child when the heartbeat was there were too harsh, as he said, as he accused DeSantis.
	And so now he's saying, I tell people, number one, you have to go with your heart.
	You have to go with your heart.
	And we've got to have three exceptions, he said, for Republicans.
	He said this supporting life He said, it hurt a lot of Republicans.
	I think you have to have three exceptions.
	If you look at France, if you look at different places in Europe, if you look at a lot of the civilized world, you really think that France is civilized?
	You want to be like France?
	By the way, again, in France, 12 weeks.
	What Trump is talking about now is 15 weeks.
	He doesn't want to be like France.
	He wants to be even less civilized.
	He said they have a period of time, but you can't go out seven months, eight months, nine months.
	If the Republicans spoke about it correctly...
	It never hurt me from the standpoint of elections.
	Oh, never hurt me.
	See, it's about that. He doesn't care.
	Trump has killed children, old people, people of every age.
	We've still got kids who are dropping dead from his injections.
	He doesn't care about anything except himself.
	An unbelievable narcissist.
	All of these politicians are narcissists, but we've never seen somebody more infatuated with himself.
	Than Donald J. Trump.
	So is it something that's going to hurt me?
	Hurt the babies. Don't hurt me.
	Rip the babies apart, but let me win the election.
	That's what this SOB is saying to people.
	Yeah, follow your heart.
	Follow your heart. You know, the Disney theology that we're told all the time by Hollywood, but especially by Disney.
	All these cartoons you grew up hearing.
	Follow your heart. Follow your heart.
	Well, what does the Bible say? The Bible says, Jeremiah, the heart is deceitful.
	Deceitful above all things.
	Desperately wicked.
	Who can know it?
	Can you know your own heart?
	It's so wicked, it deceives you.
	You need to have an objective standard outside of yourself that doesn't change.
	That you can measure yourself against.
	Even then it's hard. Because you're going to lie to yourself about it.
	No, I'm really not that bad.
	I'm basically good.
	Now, the heart is desperately wicked, so don't follow your heart.
	He says, you've got to start with your heart.
	You've got to go with your heart.
	You've got to follow your heart. And he says, if you don't have three exceptions, I think it's really hard to get elected.
	All he cares about, he doesn't care about life.
	Doesn't care about it at all.
	See, it is really easy.
	To win on the pro-life issue.
	You do what that progressive leftist did.
	She's pro-life, but she's a progressive leftist.
	She decided to run for office so that she could show pictures of the babies that were ripped apart.
	So people understand that it's murder.
	That's a brutal murder.
	Who can excuse a baby being ripped apart alive?
	Alive and being ripped apart.
	You want to explain that to me, Donnie?
	Piece of filth. The number of weeks, he says.
	I'll be coming out with a number of weeks, a recommendation fairly soon.
	I think it'll be acceptable.
	He has come out with it. Fifteen.
	No, no, it's not...
	Still murder. But this is a guy who has murdered tens of millions of people with his jabs.
	And he's bragging about that.
	And he'll brag about how he won by, you know, the dividing line or whatever.
	He's going to cut the baby in half, literally.
	Solomon didn't do that.
	Solomon threatened to do that.
	To see who really loved the babies.
	And I think when Donald Trump talks about at what point can we rip a baby to pieces alive, I think we really now understand the heart of Donald Trump on this issue.
	Do we? State's gender doctrine.
	This is in Indiana, heavily Republican Indiana.
	There's some really dark stuff that happens in Indiana, quite frankly.
	It's Indiana University. Where the Masters and Johnson thing was, you know, I can't even remember the name of the place now.
	It's this sex clinic where they did the Kinsey Report and stuff like that.
	That's out of Indiana.
	Conservative, Republican, Indiana.
	And this is out of Indiana as well.
	They took a child, CPS took a child away from the parents over this transgender stuff.
	And the parents appealed it, and I've talked about this case before, so I'm not going to go back into the actual case.
	What is new and what is part of the update is that they lost in all the Indiana courts, and they appealed it to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court says, no, we're going to let the lowercase courts stand.
	That's what they're doing in Indiana.
	They argue the removal of their son, violated their parental rights, it did, along with religious and free speech rights.
	They removed the child because they foolishly put the child in the government schools.
	The government schools groomed the child.
	The child then demanded that they use these pronouns and a new name and all the rest of the stuff.
	That's their free speech. No, we're not going to do that.
	And it violates our religious beliefs.
	And we are the parents here.
	And they're true. That's true, what they said.
	It violated parental rights, free speech rights, and religious rights.
	The Roman Catholic couple believes that God creates each person as immutably male or female.
	The Supreme Court could have agreed to do it, but they declined.
	And they left in place a lower court ruling.
	Now, in addition to denying their free speech rights, their religious rights, and their parental rights, they also had a search without a warrant.
	And the child was kidnapped from them because of their religious beliefs.
	Because their religious beliefs clashed with the government's religious beliefs.
	You see, secular humanism, LGBT, grooming, all the rest of the stuff, that is their religion.
	And GOP, Indiana.
	And that's what they want to do to each and every person that's out there.
	Let me switch over to another one here.
	This is...
	When you look at the consequences of it, this article says, Gen Z, what is the situation with Gen Z? We're talking about people from kids 11 years old to young adults 26 years old.
	Gen Z, typically no father, no friends, no religion, but they're all drugged up.
	And they're using psychotherapy to cope with this stuff.
	42% of the individuals belonging to Gen Z have been diagnosed with a mental health condition.
	Things like anxiety, depression, ADHD, PTSD, all the rest of the stuff.
	Further, 20% of them have sought therapy.
	60% are currently taking medication.
	11 to 26 years old.
	A generation growing up without parents, growing up without friends, without coaches, without religion, and they need drugs and therapy in order to get through this.
	This is what they're doing to our country, and we're letting them do this.
	Many experts believe that a breakdown of traditional values and the decline of marriage is contributing to Gen Z's mental health issues.
	In previous generations, kids talked to their mom about certain things and to their dad about others.
	About a third of Gen Z were born to single women, and 25% grew up in single-parent homes.
	90% of individuals in Gen Z view cohabitation outside of marriage as acceptable, whereas only 35% considered single parenting to have a negative impact on society.
	It truly is amazing when you look at this.
	I mean, as I've said before, I remember when you had situations like movie stars.
	Famously, Elizabeth Taylor when I was a child, you know, back in the 1950s, maybe early 60s.
	You know, multiple marriages and divorces.
	That was something that only, you know, the really promiscuous people in Hollywood did.
	And it was frowned upon.
	It actually had an impact on their careers because people say, well, I don't want to watch them anymore, you know.
	Look at how we've moved. That will still happen with transgender stuff, but not with divorce.
	90% of Generation Z think that marriage is nothing.
	They don't see any commitment.
	They don't have any relationships.
	The institutions want to have them isolated, and that is the result, is drugs and all the rest of this stuff.
	28% of them identify as LGBT. About one-third identify as having no religion.
	45% said they did not attend religious services even as an adolescent.
	Instead they've been socialized by social media.
	Now in contrast to that, if you look at the UK, there was an actress in the play The Color Purple, it's now been done as a musical, and they're putting on the play in the UK.
	She's a Christian actress, and because in the UK she put some Bible verses on social media.
	They kicked her out of her acting career and released her, and they have punished her in a lot of different ways, being canceled.
	So she sued them.
	She lost. Now she has to pay the legal fees of $350,000.
	Her name is Omumba.
	She's African. She routinely shared messages on social media about her Christian faith.
	This is not to be allowed.
	And it is, I mean, when you look at the UK, the fact that they're arresting people who would stand silently in front of an abortion clinic, are you praying silently in your head?
	Yes, I am. You're under arrest, and they've arrested that lady for three times.
	They have arrested street preachers.
	They've arrested people who publish things.
	This person here was fired from the lead role in the stage version of The Color Purple.
	Her post partly read, I do not believe you can be born gay.
	I do not believe homosexual practice is right.
	Though the law of this land has made it legal, it doesn't make it right.
	Now that's her opinion, but they won't tolerate her opinion.
	And so she said, all I did was I quoted what the Bible says about homosexuality, the need for repentance, but ultimately God's love for all humanity.
	And I stand by what I wrote, but had I known that it would have come to this, I would have set my account to the privacy mode, she said.
	I have support from actors that I've worked with, including those in same-sex relationships who say that even though they don't agree with my views, they know that I'm not hateful or malicious.
	But she lost the case and had to pay the legal fees.
	The tribunal also pointed to her previous refusal to play other roles based on her Christian beliefs.
	She was racially abused.
	She received death threats.
	She's black. And was hounded out of her career for a polite and temperate expression of what the Bible says about marriage.
	Christian Legal Center chief said it was an unjust ruling, which defends her firing, cannot stand, and we will be taking this to the Court of Appeals.
	Well, as we look at that side of it, here's a woman, and she says, I forgive them for what they're doing.
	She stands on her principles, and she wasn't trying to be a martyr.
	She wasn't trying to lecture it.
	She's just making a statement on social media.
	On the other hand, you've got Kanye West, who is incredibly rich and successful, but it's just not good enough for him.
	And he says, I've got issues with Jesus, and I'm going to put my problems into my own hands, because I really can't rely on Jesus, says Kanye West.
	Who now goes by the name Ye.
	Yay. Yay. Yay?
	Okay. Or it's the King James Version.
	It would be Ye.
	So he says he's got issues with Jesus.
	Well, he's gone out from us because he never was one of us, right?
	He said, I never saw him.
	You know, Jesus just isn't showing up with the cash that I need.
	And it's kind of interesting because, you know, he showed up with Joel Osteen and the Prosperity Gospel people, Paula White.
	I guess, you know, hey, where's my massive ship?
	It hasn't come in yet. Come on, Jesus, pony up with some cash here.
	And Jesus says, O ye of little faith.
	O Kanye of little faith.
	There's a lot of stuff I went through.
	He said, I prayed and I ain't seen Jesus show up.
	Well, he's not looking for a lord.
	He's looking for a genie in a bottle.
	Because, again, as we were talking about with the tightrope and the wheelbarrow, right?
	Trust is the thing.
	You've got to trust when difficult times come.
	And that's a big problem with the prosperity gospel of Paul White and Joel Osteen.
	Is that trouble going to come?
	You know, for most people.
	Maybe not for Paula White and for Joel Osteen.
	They keep fleecing people. But for everybody else, there's going to be difficult times.
	And it's difficult when you're a new Christian because you don't really understand that God is putting you through some difficult things for a reason and for training.
	It's always difficult.
	It's always difficult. Even if you've been through it before, it's still difficult.
	Just look at the Psalms from David.
	Why is this happening?
	Where are you? But eventually what happens is you see that you get through it, and God knew better than you, and you see that all things work together for good.
	For those who love God. What does it mean to love God?
	Well, Jesus said, if you love me, you keep my commandments.
	So, for those who keep his commandments, for those who love him, those who are called according to his purpose, things will work out for the better.
	But see, from the very beginning of all this, he made himself God.
	And, of course, he had, after he started doing his Sunday services, and you look at his Sunday services, and it's like, ooh, this is not...
	It was basically a worship service of him.
	It wasn't directed to Jesus.
	It was directed to Kanye.
	He had all these people circling around him, you know, hands up and all this stuff.
	He said, I had to put my experience in this world, my experience with my children, my experience with other people, my experience with my account, my experience with my brand, my experience with the level of music that I was dealing with.
	I had to put that in my own hands.
	Said Kanye. He said, and later in the interview, he claimed that he's God himself.
	He said, I had to do that. I had to put it in my hand because he said, you know how many threats I've been dealt with?
	And I haven't prayed my way through them threats either.
	I had to get up and do it myself.
	I had so much to do.
	I haven't had time to pray.
	Ain't got time to bleed.
	Because I'm God, he said.
	And anyone who wants to disagree, I'm the God of me.
	You can't tell me who I am.
	I can't tell y'all.
	I could tell y'all.
	It's your job to listen.
	I'm the God of me.
	I don't know if I'm in heaven already.
	Well, you may be as close to it as you're ever going to get.
	I mean, he's starting to sound like Lucifer himself, isn't he?
	He released his Jesus is King album in 2019.
	He made a lot of money off of Jesus.
	He doesn't want to give Jesus that credit.
	He rented Jesus' name out.
	And then he did his Sunday services performances where I said, literally, people were worshiping him, not God.
	And so then in some of his rap stuff, he said, they served us porn since the day we was born.
	Well, he's the one who's been serving porn to the public on a regular basis.
	After more verses filled with crude sexual references and reference to pop star Taylor Swift, West states, I am the new Jesus.
	I turn water to Chris.
	I don't know what that is. C-R-I-S? I don't know.
	Maybe we shouldn't explore that.
	If I had to guess, I'd say it's Chris Stahl, a liquor.
	Oh, okay. All right.
	Well, maybe that's what it is. We'll go with that.
	That's probably the most benign thing it could be coming from him.
	Who knows? But again, if you look at a society that is at war with every one of our institutions, that's where we are right now.
	George Mason, professor, says that marriage is white supremacy.
	She said, I theorize that marriage fundamentalism, like structural racism, is a key structuring element of the white hetero-patriarchal supremacy.
	So I guess she is anti-white, homo-matriarchal supremacy.
	These people are not looking for equality.
	They're looking for domination.
	She said, marriage fundamentalism can be understood as an ideological and cultural phenomenon where adherents espouse the superiority of a two-parent married family.
	Well, you know, when that was our value, we didn't have half of our kids doped up on drugs because they're isolated.
	Doped up on drugs and taking psychotherapy.
	That's what comes from this, because, you know, God said it's not good to be alone.
	God gave us marriage, but she knows better.
	She thinks. Well, I think her theories are worthless.
	They're rooted in a rebellion and a hatred of God.
	But, you know, God gives us these things in a loving way, just like we tell a child, don't touch.
	You know, that burner looks so nice.
	It's all red and glowing.
	I want to touch it. And you say, don't touch that.
	It's going to hurt you. God's commands about how we live our life are that way as well.
	And then finally, we have a film that is coming out.
	It says, Picture a dystopian America where Bibles are banned, Christianity is vanquished, believers are forced to embark on a perilous journey to worship Jesus in underground churches.
	In other words, an America that becomes China.
	And that's what I said about America in 2020.
	I said not just about America, I said about the entire world.
	I put that up as the name of a video on YouTube for the short period of time that I was up.
	I actually got onto YouTube for about a month and they took me off in no time at all with three strikes.
	And the first strike was at the very beginning of the year when I said, because the show starts, what was it, the 21st or something, I think, of December.
	And then, you know, right after the beginning of the new year, I put up 2020, the year the world became China.
	Because that's true.
	You know, the globalists used China as a beta test site, and we got all of that tyranny and surveillance and control and tyranny and martial law.
	We got it. Everybody got it.
	Not just the U.S. under Trump.
	So I said it was the year that the world became China.
	Now, is that a bad thing?
	YouTube thinks that's a bad...
	I do think it's a bad thing.
	YouTube thinks that becoming China is a bad thing.
	So they kicked me off.
	They know that what happened in 2020 was bad.
	But this is interesting.
	This is a film that a guy put together.
	He said he found himself wondering how he would respond If he was placed in the same position as the characters in the film that he just made a real-life predicament He said that many Christians in the world face in countries like China, North Korea, Nigeria Where you know, they throw you in prison they kill you Because of your religious beliefs or what you say and that's where we're headed You know the Marxists do it other religions do it and that's where we're going He said I saw this video on YouTube of these Christians in China
	receiving a shipment of Bibles.
	And they were pulling open the Bibles and they were ripping the Bibles out of the box.
	They were kissing these Bibles, hugging the Bibles, crying over the Bibles.
	And he said, and that was something that really just struck out to me from the beginning of the exploration of this idea.
	He said, do I treasure the Word of God as absolute hope, as absolute authority?
	As absolute truth.
	That's why they were so excited to get it.
	He said, I look at the Church of America and I just see apathy.
	He said, why aren't we bold in our faith?
	Why are we ashamed of the gospel?
	Why are we ashamed to even pronounce the name of Jesus as our only hope and our Savior?
	The filmmaker said, the primary purpose isn't to warn people that freedoms are in danger.
	Nor is it a cautionary tale about what could happen soon.
	Although both of those things are true, very true.
	But he said, I want to challenge people to evaluate their heart.
	Because the heart is desperately wicked.
	Evaluate their heart and ask themselves, do I even adhere to the idea that there is absolute truth?
	Because we live in a society right now where people are saying, I'm going to redefine what is true.
	You know, just like Kanye said, I am God.
	I will be God.
	I will ascend to the highest...
	You got to watch out. I mean, obviously, he didn't get past Genesis 101, did he?
	The first chapter or two of it.
	The real truth, he argued, is found in the Word of God only.
	That's the point of his movie.
	The movie is going to be Disciples in the Moonlight.
	It's going to be released this July as a phantom event.
	So, anyway, it's a good question.
	You know, when you look at people who have been through this, it's really going to refine the church, isn't it?
	Thank you for listening. Let me tell you, The David Knight Show, you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	And you want to know something else?
	You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at TheDavidKnightShow.com.

▲