Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 20, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:09

The David Knight Show - 03/20/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds
	You're listening to The David Night Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday the 20th of March, year of our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to take a look at more pandemic politics.
	You think this is over? You think this will ever be over?
	No, just as we see the continuing movement against people who push back on this from the beginning, I mean, we've got the Pope weighing in on this again now, attacking anti-vaxxers at this point.
	Nothing has been removed, has it?
	We've got all the usurpations still in place, and yet these people who put them in are now making their move to come back.
	And I think nothing illustrates this better than what is happening to Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil.
	And we're going to talk about the absurdity of what they're doing, but it's amazing parallels to what is happening here in the United States with one key difference.
	Bolsonaro actually opposed the vaccine, actually opposed the pandemic narrative, unlike Trump.
	We'll be right back. Well,
	they have now indicted, it remains to be seen whether or not the prosecution is going to go through, but they have now indicted Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, former president of Brazil.
	They've indicted him for false documentation about having been vaccinated.
	This would carry a prison sentence of between 2 and 12 years.
	And when I saw this, I said, well, the virus was always political, wasn't it?
	It was always about obedience.
	It was always about conformity to their orders.
	It was always about martial law.
	It was just coming to us as a medical type of emergency.
	That was how they sold it.
	And I said, by the way, he's also accused of harassing a humpback whale.
	And I said, no, that is not the Babylon Bee.
	That is how absurd this has gotten.
	And quite frankly, the absurdity of harassing a humpback whale or the absurdity of coming after Jair Bolsonaro Pretending that he wanted to make the world think that he was not vaccinated is equally absurd.
	Take a look at these headlines going back three years.
	So this is back in September of 2021.
	He and a delegation of the Brazil government came to the United States, went to New York, went to the UN, and everybody was freaking out.
	Take a look at this. This is the Washington Post.
	Brazil's unvaccinated Bolsonaro appears to break UN vaccine honor system during an address.
	You're not supposed to go into the UN, said the Washington Post, unless you have been vaccinated.
	And they all knew that he had not been vaccinated.
	He was very upfront about all that.
	The New York Times. Unvaccinated and defiant.
	Bolsonaro pushes back against criticism in his UN speech.
	He said, we have been successful by not doing any of this pandemic stuff.
	And I'm not getting vaccinated.
	Take a look at this. Reuters.
	COVID-19 vaccine skeptic Bolsonaro gets a pass at the UN. Well, they let him speak even though he was not vaccinated.
	He broke the honor system.
	But he doesn't get a pass at the New York restaurants.
	They're not going to let him in in 2021 because in New York restaurants you had to show some kind of card that said that you'd been vaccinated.
	He didn't have a card that said he'd been vaccinated.
	And yet that is exactly the charge that's being brought against him by the Brazilian government.
	They, Business Insider, doubled down on it, celebrated the fact that they had a photograph, and we've all seen this photograph that was in the other one as well, shows Brazil's unvaccinated president eating pizza on a sidewalk in New York, where unvaccinated people are barred from dining indoors.
	So yeah, you're going to eat outside, pal.
	And again, he was defiant.
	He was not apologizing about it.
	He wasn't producing any fake paperwork, so he could get into these wonderful New York restaurants.
	CNN. Isolated, but defiant.
	Brazil's Bolsonaro defends handling of COVID and of climate by the UN. This is a guy, they say, well, he's the South American Trump.
	No, he's the real deal. Trump is a Davos plant.
	Bolsonaro was the real deal in terms of the vaccine and the pandemic, of the climate, MacGuffin.
	He actually opposed all that stuff.
	That's why they're coming after him for everything, including harassing a humpback whale.
	And then finally, let's see, we've got this.
	Wall Street Journal, Brazil's unvaccinated president, goes into quarantine after his return from New York.
	Well, they knew it as well. A member of his delegation tested positive.
	Was he sick? Or was this the PCR test?
	Another nonsense aspect of all of this.
	Yeah, so now that's where he is right now.
	After all of that, they claim, and they want to send him to jail for 2 to 12 years because they say he claimed that he was vaccinated.
	They say he claimed that he actually created fake paperwork.
	And what is that based upon?
	It's based on the testimony of one person who is a former aide, and it's based on some forged documents.
	Who forged the documents?
	Did the government forge the documents, or did Bolsonaro forge the documents?
	It's absolutely amazing to see this.
	And yet, the federal police indictment released by the Brazilian Supreme Court alleged that Bolsonaro and 16 others inserted false information into a public health database to make it appear as though the then president, his 12-year-old daughter, and several others in the circle had received the COVID-19 vaccine.
	Interestingly enough, they have the testimony of one guy who says, yeah, you know, I know that he did this.
	And again, a former aide.
	And then they said, well, you know, when he went to the United States, you couldn't get in there unless you were vaccinated.
	Well, we just saw all of that and what everybody was doing attacking him.
	They said they issued their respective vaccination certificates and used them to cheat current health restrictions.
	No, he was defiant about it.
	The detective said in the indictment that Bolsonaro's aide-de-camp, Mauro Cid, told investigators the former president asked him to insert the false data into the system for both himself and his daughter.
	So they don't even have a physical thing.
	He says, yeah, he told me to go in and change it in the computer.
	This is like Vault 7, you know?
	Oh, yeah, we know we got a cyber attack from fill-in-the-blank.
	Who's your enemy this week?
	Is it Russia, China, North Korea?
	Who is it? Iran.
	We got cyber attack this week, and we know it because, you know, we can tell which country this is coming from.
	And so, you know, cyber attack, as the Obama administration said, is just as real as if they had sent a bomb over here.
	So now we can send our bombs over there to wherever it is.
	And, of course, we've seen that Vault 7, the CIA, has tools to make it look like they are anybody that they wish.
	They can make it look like they're Russian, Chinese, anything.
	And of course, those tools have been released in the wild.
	So it's not just governments that can do that.
	It's not just the United States government.
	It's any government can do that.
	All the governments have that Vault 7 tool now.
	And so because somebody went into a computer and changed something somewhere.
	Oh, this is Bolsonaro who wanted this done.
	Well, I tell you, it truly is amazing.
	As Chuckie Schumer said, these people have a million different ways they can come after you if you oppose them.
	One former aide who said that he changed the stuff on the orders of Bolsonaro.
	Bolsonaro was one of the world leaders who railed against the vaccine, says AP. I think he was the only one who did it.
	As a matter of fact, one of these articles said he was the only G20 leader who was not vaccinated or who did not claim to be vaccinated.
	Let's just understand that. Alex Jones was right about the sugar water stuff.
	I think that's what these guys got when they did their photo ops.
	I think they were the ones who got sugar water.
	Maybe, you know, maybe that's Alex's intel, right?
	Right there. Yeah, Trump's got the good vaccine for himself.
	The sugar water vaccine without the adjuvants.
	The rest of you are going to get the real deal.
	And it's a lottery.
	And we vary the concentration of this by a significant amount.
	Anywhere from 3 to 100 micrograms or something.
	I forget what the unit of measurement was.
	But they're going to vary the intensity of it by a factor of 33.
	Because you were the test that Trump skipped.
	So he could put it out at warp speed.
	They say, this is the Associated Press talking, Bolsonaro openly flouted health restrictions.
	Openly. He openly.
	And he encouraged other Brazilians to follow his example.
	So why would he change this health certificate?
	He had traveled without it.
	He had talked about it.
	Everybody had criticized him, the Brazilian government, the U.S. government, the global government.
	His administration ignored several offers from pharmaceutical company Pfizer to sell Brazil tens of millions of shots in 2020.
	It's just maddening to me to see how the Associated Press hides evidence.
	It was Stat News, a trade publication.
	I talked about this. Stat News.
	And they're very objective.
	And they're a trade publication.
	But the Associated Press is so...
	They're disinformation agents for the government.
	And they would not cover it.
	I don't know of anybody, really, that covered the Stat News.
	I covered it.
	It was covered in the Indian press.
	And that's basically it.
	But the documents are there.
	The fact that Brazil, Bolsonaro's country...
	Brazil, Argentina, and a third Latin American country, according to Stat News, a pharmaceutical trade publication.
	So, Argentina, Brazil, and a third unnamed country, but all three of them, They didn't think
	of that. When George W. Bush gave them additional immunity in 2005 with the PrEP Act, they didn't put fraud in there.
	So these people are still vulnerable to that.
	And their claims were and are continue to be fraudulent, just like Trump's.
	And so they ought to be sued for fraud.
	But at the time, and where I saw it was not in Stat News, I saw it when it was reported by the Indian press out of India.
	And they said, this is absolutely amazing.
	They're asking. They want Brazil and Argentina.
	And again, this third country was unnamed because they submitted to the blackmail of Pfizer.
	You're not going to go anywhere, said Pfizer, if you don't have this shot.
	So this is what we want from you.
	You know, they were strong-arming, blackmailing people.
	We were talking about RICO statute.
	If there was ever a time where the RICO statute needed to be applied, it's with Pfizer.
	And so the Indian press said, can you believe this?
	They're asking for liens against embassies abroad.
	You know, because they could be valuable real estate property.
	You could take them over. And they didn't want to be indemnified against risk with any domestic assets that the government could come after them and say, no, you're not taking that.
	They wanted to have stuff outside of that country.
	And that was the thing that was most amazing about it, that Stat News talked about, that the Indian press talked about.
	They said they want to lean on tanks and other things like that.
	Tanks and embassies was kind of the headline.
	They kind of click-baited it.
	But it truly was amazing.
	And so the Associated Press puts it this way.
	His administration ignored several offers from Pfizer to sell Brazil tens of millions of shots in 2020.
	You better believe he did.
	By the way, I'll get to this later when I talk about press.
	Gannett News, this was sent to me by listener Roy.
	Gannett News has just announced at USA Today that they're not going to use AP anymore.
	Now, it's not because AP is a bunch of lying shills for the government.
	It's because they can't afford to.
	I mean, they're hitting hard times.
	So I guess they're going to have to do some of the reporting themselves.
	Go back to the old school way of doing it.
	Instead of just, you know, the AP puts this stuff together and sends the news out and they just stick it in their paper and put it out.
	It's one of the reasons why these papers are failing.
	They don't do the work.
	They don't look at different competing information sources, give you a couple of different signs about it, tell you what they think and do it now.
	No, they just parrot whatever.
	They just republish whatever AP does.
	And we know what AP is about.
	AP is the ones that are putting out the style, rules, and all the rest of this stuff.
	No, you're going to use these words and not those words.
	You're not going to call people illegal aliens.
	You're going to call them undocumented migrant arrivals, childhood arrivals or something, right?
	Don't call them aid care babies.
	Don't use the term pro-life.
	These people are anti-abortion rights.
	Use the term pro-life. AP won't allow that to happen.
	Anyway, so AP says he openly criticized the move by Sao Paulo's state governor to buy vaccines from a Chinese company, Sinovac, because there were no other doses available because he wasn't going to do business with Pfizer.
	And now... Now he is being charged for trying to pretend that he's got a vaccine.
	Nobody anywhere was a more open opponent to this kill shot, this bioweapon, than Bolsonaro was.
	And they're coming after him for everything.
	They had a January the 8th event where people were protesting the election of the Marxists down there.
	We got our Marxists up here.
	It's very similar to that.
	The difference is...
	I think, in my opinion.
	Certainly, Trump is a total shill.
	I don't know everything about Bolsonaro, so I'm not going to defend him.
	I'm sure I'll get some letters. Well, you know what Bolsonaro did with this?
	I'm just saying he was genuine when it came to the pandemic, when it came to the vaccine.
	He was somebody who actually did have a threat on his life.
	We keep seeing, you know, all these Trump sycophants like Alex Jones saying, oh, they're going to kill Trump.
	Well, they did try to kill Bolsonaro before he got elected the first time.
	and on and on and we know that Is that when you look at the election stuff and I talked about this long before the January 20 20 election the fact that these Electronic voting machine companies like smartmatic and many others in smartmatic began in Venezuela Friends of Hugo Chavez to keep him in office. They had one scandal after the other they had congressional
	Level scandals and hearings about what had happened in the election with these voting machines and it happened in several Mexican provinces It happened in Brazil.
	It happened in the Philippines and many other places.
	This is not anything new, and it's not limited to one company.
	This is across the entire industry, but that one company had been involved in many of these.
	And one of the most famous of these that I had talked about before the 2016 election, in detail, was in Brazil.
	And it was a woman who was the successor to this guy that's there now, the Marxist Lula.
	And the day before the election, she showed up at a big soccer match, what we call it in the U.S., they call it a football match.
	And the massive full stadium booed her out of the stadium.
	And then we're supposed to believe that the next day she won the election.
	What happened the next day? Was that she was losing something like 60-40.
	And then everything went dark.
	All the machines went down.
	When they come back up, now she's winning 60-40.
	That type of thing.
	So anyway, you know, you think that you've got something here that was really clear there.
	What was happening? Bolsonaro's lawyer called his client's indictment absurd.
	He said when he was president, he was completely exempted from showing any kind of certificate on his trips.
	It wasn't just that he was openly, publicly trashing this idea, but as a president, he didn't have to show anybody any certificates.
	Badges? We don't need no stinking badges, he told the UN. This is political persecution, an attempt to void the enormous political capital that has only grown.
	Because you see the Marxists, whether they're in Brazil or whether they're in America, they absolutely have no shame.
	It doesn't matter how absurd the charges are.
	It doesn't matter how obviously political persecution, how obvious it is that it's political persecution.
	They don't care. They really don't care.
	Do you think Stalin and Mao cared?
	No. Do you think these people care here in the United States and Brazil?
	No, they don't. He has lied until this day about his nefarious administration, they said, but now he will have to face the truth in the courts.
	Did you harass that humpback whale?
	What is... How does one exactly intimidate and harass a giant humpback whale?
	What is up now, big coward, they said.
	Are you going to face this or are you going to run away to Miami?
	Ha! Brazil's Supreme Court has already seized his passport.
	They want to keep him there, and they want to put him behind bars between 2 and 12 years, as I said before.
	He's 68.
	He would be nearly as old as Biden.
	His career would be over when he got out.
	It's just... I mean, when you look at the age, I forget what the age of Reagan was, but he was about a decade younger than both Trump and Biden.
	Everybody was like, he's too old to be president.
	Schor also said he is awaiting information from the U.S. Justice Department.
	This is a guy coming after him.
	To clarify whether those under investigation did make use of the false vaccination certificates upon their arrival and stay in American territory.
	Well, maybe you want to go back to all the mainstream media that you trust and love so much.
	Washington Post, New York Times, Reuters, CNN, Wall Street Journal.
	They've all got it.
	A Senate committee inquiry that ended in October 2021 with a recommendation for nine criminal charges against Bolsonaro, alleging that he mismanaged the pandemic because he didn't do anything with it.
	And he said it worked better because we didn't harm people with lockdowns like Trump.
	He didn't say like Trump.
	I'll say like Trump.
	Whenever I talk about Bolsonaro, the transcript program always translates it as bows and arrows.
	I guess he's suffering these slings and arrows of outrageous fortune at this point in time, isn't he?
	Bolsonaro retains staunch allegiance amongst his political base, an outpouring of support just last month when an estimated 185,000 people clogs Sao Paulo's main boulevard to decry what they and the former president characterize as political persecution.
	The indictment will not turn off his backers.
	And it will only confirm his detractors' suspicions.
	You see, this is one of the reasons why the Marxists in this country and in Brazil do that.
	That's exactly why they're doing what they're doing with Trump.
	It's not going to turn off his backers.
	It will confirm his detractors.
	But it will actually make him more popular with his backers.
	And they want, in this country, they want Trump to run.
	Run, Forrest, run!
	Ha, ha, ha! They're out there cheering on the sidelines.
	Brazil's top electoral court has already ruled that Bolsonaro is ineligible to run for office until 2030 on the grounds that he abused his power during the campaign because he cast unfounded doubts on the country's electronic voting system.
	As I said, they'd already had massive hearings and trials about what happened in Brazil.
	It was an open scandal.
	And there was absolutely no reason to think that anything was fixed.
	Another investigation relates to his alleged involvement in a January the 8th, 2023 uprising in the capital of Brasilia, soon after Lula took power again.
	So he's got his January the 8th instead of a January the 6th.
	So, again, they claim that he's falsifying his vaccine card, and it's not even a vaccine card.
	I said, when this whole thing was being put together, I said, there's absolutely no moral reason not to forge a vaccine card.
	Just be careful you don't get caught.
	Just think about what the penalties are if you get caught versus what else is going to happen.
	But I said they have no authority to restrict our movement with a vaccine card.
	That is a usurpation of power.
	There's absolutely no law that has been declared.
	Nothing has been passed. And if they did pass a law, which they didn't bother to do, it would be in direct contradiction to the Constitution.
	So go ahead and forge your papers.
	Just don't get caught, because they're going to come down hard on anybody that they forge it.
	And so, don't wear the pinwheels, in other words, what Todd Frill was telling everybody.
	If the government tells you to wear pinwheels, wear pinwheels.
	I said, no, if the government tells you to wear pinwheels, you know, that's not what you do.
	Not at all. Anyway, he said, his comments of this, he says, I'm calm.
	I don't owe anything.
	He said, the world knows I didn't take the vaccine.
	The world knows. The Washington Post told the world, the New York Times, Reuters, CNN, Wall Street Journal, everybody, everybody told, he told everybody, I didn't take the vaccine.
	Why would I tell somebody to go and fix the computer records so that I could travel?
	I don't even, as president, need to have any identity papers to travel.
	During the pandemic, he panned the vaccine.
	Instead, he insisted on alternative treatments such as ivermectin.
	For this, he was investigated by Brazil's Congress, which recommended that the former president be charged with crimes against humanity.
	Isn't that amazing? It's people like Trump and the people who pushed the vaccine who committed crimes against humanity.
	People like Peter Navarro, who killed people with the ventilators and then ran his little scams about paying them four or five times what they had been paying them in the past.
	You got corruption, you got crony capitalism, you got murder on a mass, global scale.
	From people like Peter Navarro and Trump.
	And yet, they don't get charged with crimes against humanity.
	The guy who gets charged with crimes against humanity is the guy who pushed back against it and said, Ivermectin.
	So, that's where we are.
	Isn't it amazing? The pandemic just keeps rolling.
	The gift that just keeps giving to the globalists, isn't it?
	Now, I said that he was also being charged for harassing a black whale.
	So let's get in the evidence for this.
	This was off the coast of Sao Paulo last year.
	Under Brazilian legislation, motorized vessels must keep a minimum distance of 100 meters from Wales.
	You can't go close to Ireland or Scotland either.
	An intentional attempt to get closer can lead to a sentence of up to two to five years in prison.
	We got too close to...
	I mean, you know, in Florida, they had concerns about the manatees, very slow-moving sea cows that, you know, they wouldn't get out of the way.
	People were constantly hitting them by accident.
	They weren't trying to harass them or hurt them.
	But they would hit them by accident with a speedboat or something, because you wouldn't see them.
	They'd be just under the surface, and you would see pictures of the manatees with big scars on their back and stuff like that.
	But, you know, nobody had any animosity to them.
	He doesn't have any animosity to a whale.
	Somebody took a picture of him.
	They said, look at this. He's not 100 meters away from a whale.
	So they went and put him in jail for two to five years for that.
	Maybe jaywalking or something, too, right?
	It's just amazing to me.
	Like I said, about...
	About Peter Navarro.
	I said, this is like putting mass murder in jail for jaywalking.
	This is like leaving the mass murderers out and then putting the person who tried to stop the mass murder in jail for jaywalking.
	Put him in jail for two to five years.
	So, as we talk about crimes against humanity, someone confronted Anderson Cooper on a Mexican beach.
	Sorry, wrong one here.
	Let's see. Here it is.
	95% safe and effective, Mr.
	Cooper? 95% safe and effective?
	How do you sleep at night?
	How do you sleep at night?
	Fear-mongering a virus with a 99.97% survival rate.
	How do you sleep at night?
	Now he just walks off.
	You're a mass serial killer.
	Yeah, I agree. I agree.
	Well, here's how he sleeps at night.
	Good Morning America is brought to you by Pfizer.
	CBS Help Watch sponsored by Pfizer.
	Anderson Cooper 360.
	Brought to you by Pfizer.
	Yeah, yeah. He's brought to you by Pfizer.
	He sleeps very well at night.
	You know, people like him.
	People like Tucker Carlson making tens of millions of dollars.
	Their sponsors are Pfizer.
	That's how they sleep well at night, I guess.
	I don't know. So, yeah, that just was posted up yesterday, or two days ago, rather.
	Now, this person, because this was put up on a pro-Trump site.
	Oh, all Trump, all the time.
	Now, do that, not just with Anderson Cooper, but do that with Trump.
	Ask Donald Trump, how do you sleep at night?
	Trump's got more culpability in this than Anderson Cooper does by a long shot.
	How does Trump sleep at night with all of this?
	How does Pope Francis sleep at night, by the way?
	He's about to take a dirt nap for a long time.
	He better get things straightened out, but it doesn't look like he's going to do it.
	Francis denounces the anti-vaxxers.
	He's out there coming after the anti-vaxxers now.
	So the Marxists in Brazil, and of course he's from Brazil as well, The boys from Brazil.
	Not Nazi clones, they're Marxist clones, aren't they?
	He denounces anti-vaxxers.
	He calls the COVID jab refusal an almost suicidal act of denial.
	Well, here's the thing, Francis.
	I deny the COVID MacGuffin.
	I deny the climate MacGuffin that you love so much.
	And I deny you, you Jesuit deceiver.
	This guy is just...
	And this is an article, by the way, from LifeSite.
	LifeSite News, a Catholic site.
	Francis has issued fresh condemnation of critics of the abortion-tainted COVID-19 injections, says LifeSite News, saying that opposition to these shots distressed him.
	Yeah, it's a suicidal act of denial, he said.
	This guy is a globalist, satanic shill.
	It's just amazing to me.
	He said, deciding whether to get vaccinated is always an ethical choice, but I know many people signed up to movements opposed to the administration of the medication.
	This distressed me, because in my view, being against the antidote is almost a suicidal act of denial.
	Well, I imagine he probably supports suicide and pretty much every form of murder that's out there.
	He also made a thinly veiled condemnation of Cardinal Raymond Burke, who voiced strong opposition to the injections and who was also hospitalized with COVID-19 and serious health issues.
	He said, there's even a few anti-vaxxers among the bishops.
	Some came close to death.
	Guess what?
	Pretty much all these guys are past life expectancy.
	They probably have multiple comorbidities.
	If they get a flu-like symptoms, they're given a hospital death protocol.
	you So what's difficult about this for us to understand?
	I've been talking about this for four years.
	Four years now.
	Because we passed the anniversary where Trump kicked this off for the globalists.
	Referring to the COVID-related lockdowns as a grim scenario, Francis said this grim scenario began to change with the arrival of the first vaccines.
	That didn't change anything.
	They didn't help anybody.
	You see, this guy, when he lies, he's speaking his native language, as Jesus said.
	He's a liar.
	He's descended from the father of lies.
	And when he lies, he's speaking his native language.
	There's also claims that there was nothing but water in the vials, he said.
	Is he talking about Alex Jones again?
	It's just sugar water, man.
	You can take the sugar water. It's okay.
	Another liar. The sender of the father of lies.
	He said all of this created confusion and panic.
	Yeah, that's what the World Health Organization did.
	That's what the executive orders did from Trump and these various other heads of state.
	It didn't matter what political party, what country.
	What their stated political philosophies was.
	They all did the same thing.
	Vast globalist conspiracy.
	You're not going to say, look, there's the global government.
	But it was global governance that was happening.
	And we know who one of the chief administrators of it was.
	Trump. In January 2021, Francis and Pope Benedict were among the first to receive the abortion-tainted injections, says LifeSite News.
	They said Pfizer's production of abortion pills, along with its production of a COVID-19 injection involving tests using the HEK-293 cell line, derived from kidney tissue taken from a healthy baby, aborted in the Netherlands in the 1970s, seemingly undeterred the ethical question.
	And Francis met twice secretly with Pfizer CEO Francis Borla during 2021, with Borla also speaking at a Vatican-hosted health conference.
	The Vatican also mandated COVID jabs for Vatican employees and visitors, removing the option to test negative for the virus and allowing only proof of recovery from the virus as an alternative to the injection.
	An additional mandate resulted in three Swiss guards losing their jobs.
	It comes after the military.
	It's hard to think of the Swiss guards in the Vatican as the military, but they pass for that.
	So some Swiss guards refused to take it and they got kicked out of the Vatican military.
	COVID injection mandates finally ended in June 2022, though it was extended for the Swiss guards.
	As late as January 2023, COVID shots were still required for reporters wishing to join the Pope on Pope Journeys, a mandate which expired that April.
	Highlighting the intimate link to abortion which the injections have, Cardinal Burke again, who did not die but survived, said in May of 2020 that it is never morally justified to develop a vaccine through the use of cell lines of aborted fetuses, that the thought of it being injected into one's body is rightly abhorrent.
	He also noted the vaccination may not be imposed in a totalitarian manner on citizens.
	Well, that guy's got it straight.
	It was totalitarian.
	It was an abomination morally, an abomination politically.
	And the entire COVID-19 scam...
	Was a coup d'etat.
	Says the Daily Skeptic.
	And maybe, you know, we look at this thing as really...
	Well, this is really an excellent article.
	I would suggest reading it.
	JamesAlexander at thedailyskeptic.org.
	That's out of the UK. They spell skeptic with a C instead of a K. But he said, you know, first of all, let's understand the universal class.
	And we've all heard of the Hegelian dialectic, right?
	Well, Hegel had a lot of different things to say besides that.
	One of the things that he talked about was the universal class.
	In his book, Philosophy of Right, he suggested we've got classes or states, and then we have individuals.
	All of whom are pursuing their own interests.
	But there is one class that is not serving its own interest because it is serving the public interest.
	I know, I know.
	Your BS meter is just pinned over to the side.
	Mine is too. He says this is what he calls the universal class.
	For Hegel, this meant bureaucrats.
	So this is not the Hegelian dialectic.
	This is the Hegelian lie.
	There is a universal class, he says, that is serving not their own interests, but the interests of the public.
	This altruistic, self-sacrificing group of people we call bureaucrats.
	Yeah, I know. I know.
	But let's continue with this line of thought.
	Hagel never had to go to the DMV, huh?
	He didn't have to go to the DMV. No, he didn't.
	I don't know where he lived.
	Government didn't have the kind of footprint that it does now on our face, did it?
	Anyway, so the writer says there's two things to say about this.
	Well, there's more than two things you can say about this.
	The first is that Marx...
	In the course of inverting Hegel, decided that the universal class was not the bureaucracy, but the proletariat.
	Clever. And indeed, this is still a favored alternative.
	Perhaps the only other serious candidate for a universal class is the academic fantastical one of the intellectuals and the experts, the people who know how to do it.
	You know, the COVID-19 net zero diversity brigade.
	Those are the people that we trust, right?
	It's kind of interesting, as I look at this, because he doesn't talk about this, but you think about those two.
	Fauci had a leg in both camps, didn't he?
	He pulled the, you know, I'm an expert thing.
	Plus, he was also a bureaucrat, a little petty-fogging bureaucrat.
	And when you talk about the academic class, That was exactly what Francis Bacon...
	I've been saying this now since before all this lockdown.
	I said this when I was fighting the climate change stuff.
	I said, do you understand what real science is?
	Do you understand what the scientific method is?
	Do you know anything about what Francis Bacon was pushing back against?
	Francis Bacon said, we got these people who are at Oxford and Cambridge and these other...
	And they're recognized as a royal astronomer or whatever.
	And whatever they say goes...
	He says, no, we need to have a scientific method.
	And a scientific method, you're going to tell us what your hypothesis is and what physical evidence you have for that.
	And then we need to be able to reproduce that.
	If we can't reproduce that, forget about it.
	You know, you see this all the time when it comes to fusion.
	People still use the scientific method.
	Somebody will come out and say, we've got cold fusion.
	Oh, yeah? Tell us how you did that.
	Sorry, we couldn't reproduce that.
	So you've got nothing. But not when it comes to this stuff.
	Increasingly, we're seeing the scientific method by Francis Bacon shoved aside, and we're going back to what he called academia.
	And that's the other class that's here.
	But it's interesting, I think, that Fauci had a leg in both camps, but especially in the bureaucrat camp.
	He said, the second thing to say about this is that any member of the universal class, whatever it is, is likely to be extremely conceited.
	You are serving your interests, but I am serving the public interest.
	See? Haven't we heard that? Altruistic.
	You know, Fauci. The man who has been paid more than any other person, paid more by the federal government, higher salary than any other person in history.
	No president has ever been paid that much.
	And he got about double what he should have gotten.
	His salary should have been capped at just over $200,000.
	The salary of his boss and his boss's boss and all these people who are part of the cabinet, the heads of these different divisions, their salaries are all capped at the salary of the vice president.
	But he got more than the president, who gets about double that.
	And he got even more than the president.
	And now he's drawing a pension that is bigger than any federal employee has ever pulled.
	But he's Mr. Altruism, isn't he?
	I'm serving the public interest, not my own.
	Yeah. He said, Large pension.
	And the problem is with our entire education system at the moment, from school upwards, is that it seems to encourage people to opine and to emote and to genuflect in ways which involve ostentatious and positively pecksniffian displays of concern.
	I had to look that up.
	That is from an obscure Charles Dickens novel.
	Again, he's writing from the UK. I had to look this up.
	There's a character in it called Pecksniff.
	He was a smug hypocrite, an architect that became evidently a figure of speech in the UK. I have to remember that.
	Thanks, sniffing it. But then I'll also have to explain it every time I use it.
	Anyway, so displays of concern for the greater good, the commonweal, the public interest, and so forth.
	Of our three great candidates for the universal class, it has to be said the proletariat is out of favor.
	Because of the word populist.
	He said, So this leaves the other two candidates for the universal class,
	the intellectuals on the one hand and the bureaucrats on the other.
	Those of us who get easily bored focus on the bright intellectuals.
	However, this person who he's referencing, and he's got a clip to their discussion, McGrogan says that we should overcome our scruples. We should turn on the night-vision goggles and focus on the dim bureaucrats instead. You know, the Morlocks that come out of the caves at night to mess with the Eloi. Since it is their inertia and sense that they are right, and their absolute inability to
	justify how they are right, forms the immovable obstacle that is the sewer of modern state. They make intellectuals look like leaves in a windy autumn, easily dissipated.
	This is a blast to read this, guys.
	Excellent writer. Secondly, I wanted to talk about coup d'etat.
	Everyone thinks they know what a coup d'etat is.
	Surely, it is an insurrection, an attempt to snatch power away from those who hold it.
	Surely, it is something like the October Revolution of 1917, or something like January the 6th.
	Well, it can be these.
	But it is actually something far more interesting than mere insurrection.
	For as originally defined by the remarkable French writer of the early 17th century, Gabrielle Nade, it is not something which is done to a state, but a coup d'etat is something done by a state.
	That's where we are.
	He said it is inflicted by the state on the people.
	He said it was like the act of a god, a thunderbolt, a raining down of disaster, an Old Testament plague, a sudden blow.
	So this writer says, I submit that COVID-19 was a coup d'etat.
	Or in the case of Benedict Donald, a toupee d'etat, maybe.
	If we suppose that Plato is right and the state was founded on a noble lie, if we suppose that Machiavelli is right and that politicians need to employ all the arts of force and of fraud, as he referred to it, the lion and fox.
	That's interesting, isn't it?
	In order to maintain their own state, if we suppose that Nadea is right and the state acts most decisively and mysteriously when it acts like a capricious god, then conspiracy theories are not the works of madmen, but what Fauci would call just common sense.
	Or the South Carolina governor, McMaster, who is arguing for this very thing.
	You know, there was a coup d'etat with Trump.
	With his pharmaceutical executive that he put in charge of HHS, who announced at the end of January there was a worldwide pandemic, when there wasn't even an epidemic anywhere.
	Nowhere. Not even in China was there an epidemic.
	And after they did that coup d'etat, you've got people like Republican governors, McMaster in South Carolina, who wants to keep that in place, even though Republican legislators in the state want to get rid of it.
	A medical freedom act. He's opposing that.
	No, we need to have that there.
	I might need to use that on you again in the near future.
	The modern academic and journalistic habit of deriding conspiracy theories is just one more way of concealing the arcana imperi by which our order is alchemized, cabalized, and witch-doctored by our overlords.
	Fourthly, he said it's perhaps worth saying something about Michael Gove's recent redefinition of extremism.
	This is a British politician who goes by the label of conservative.
	It's funny to me, you know, people in every other country except America are perfectly fine saying this was Trudeau's lockdown or this was Boris Johnson's lockdown or this is something that was done by Gove.
	You know, and pox be upon him.
	Or by Hancock, Matt Hancock, not John Hancock, Matt Hancock, the bad Hancock.
	You know, they don't have a problem pointing the finger at these people, but boy, in the United States, we cannot point the finger at Trump.
	That's why they put him in there.
	I was just thinking about that the other day.
	About the only thing I've ever heard Scott Adams say the Dilbert cartoonist.
	The only thing I've ever heard him say that I agreed with was he said, you know, when Hillary Clinton said, when her slogan was, I'm with her.
	He said that was just a losing proposition.
	He said, look at that in 2016.
	Her slogan is, I'm with her.
	Trump's is, make America great again.
	And I thought about this yesterday because I saw somebody talking about how bad both Trump and Biden are.
	And the guy was, you know, Republican, and so he talked about Reagan.
	He said, you know, when Reagan came on the scene, he was really well known.
	He was a celebrity. He had been a governor for two terms and all the rest of this stuff.
	But when he came out, he didn't make it about himself.
	He made it about the people.
	He said, are you better off today than you were four years ago?
	And he said, so there's a couple of things about that.
	First of all, it's not about me.
	It's not about my narcissism.
	It's not about how great I am, even though he was a movie star and a governor and all the rest of the stuff.
	It's not about me. It's about you.
	How are you doing? And furthermore, he said it was about acknowledging what his job truly was, to try to serve the people, make things better for them.
	Not what you see now.
	Now what you see is this narcissism on both sides, Biden and Trump.
	It's all about them, isn't it?
	It's about this reprehensible old man versus that reprehensible old man.
	And so really, that was at play.
	You know, you go back to 2016.
	But that's not what's there today.
	And I told Karen this morning, I said, you know, probably ought to do a t-shirt.
	You know, it had the I'm with her.
	And it had the arrow pointing left.
	And it said, Hillary, 2016.
	Well, we could have, I'm with him.
	And the arrow points to the right, and underneath it says Trump 2024.
	I mean, that's really what I think the cult would just snap up.
	Don't you? It's like Phyllis Schlafly.
	The left truly hated Jesse Helms out of North Carolina.
	And at one event she went to, they were selling toilet paper.
	And every sheet of toilet paper had a picture of Jesse Helms on it.
	And people were buying those.
	And so she bought one of them.
	And what she did was she tore them off and sold the sheets individually.
	And made a lot more money and then donated it to his campaign.
	Which I thought was a very interesting guerrilla warfare.
	Maybe we should do an I'm with him.
	Because it's all about identity politics, isn't it?
	It's the identity politics of Trump and the identity politics of Biden.
	It's the partisan politics of Republican and partisan politics of Democrat.
	It's not about principles.
	It's not about your liberty.
	It's not about freedom, medical or otherwise.
	It's about this coup that they put in.
	About them retaining and keeping this power.
	Retaining and keeping their boot on your face because they're going to start stomping again soon after this election.
	Right now, you know, they don't want to get the ants too stirred up.
	But after the election, they're going to start the stomping.
	So he says, Michael Gove's recent redefinition of extremism He said extremes are feared by those who think they're in the middle, the ones who think most pompously that they are in the middle, serving the public interest and not their own miscellaneous interest.
	These are the members of the universal class.
	And the deep state, the blob, the universal class, whatever you want to call it, is trying to define something arbitrarily in the hope that it can hold the leaking sides of the ship of state together.
	I love this quote.
	But definitions are for schools, not for politicians.
	Whatever. Or for the AP. Whatever the word means, they're going to change it.
	They're going to seize the wall.
	Forget about this definition.
	Extremist? I've got a new definition for extremist.
	Gove's redefinition is yet another gesture toward defending what he calls British values, which no one has ever believed in.
	He says extremism, he says Churchill didn't believe in them, Gladstone, not Pitt, not Walpole, not Clarendon, not Cromwell, on and on.
	They never believed in something called British values.
	They were specific about what it was.
	It's kind of like they got rid of duty, honor, and country.
	It was too specific, wasn't it?
	Now they've got army values.
	Because you are to pledge your allegiance to serve the army, not to serve the country.
	That's the bigger issue.
	And I haven't still, to this day, I've seen a lot of people now that picked up on this duty, honor, country.
	Nobody has that view, which I think is the most important view.
	Yes, duty, honor, and country are important, and I don't understand, maybe I do understand, what they have a problem with with those three.
	I think they've got a problem with all three words, frankly.
	But when you look at the paragraph that the cadets were to memorize, the old version was to serve the country through the army.
	Now it's to serve the army and the country.
	Yeah, but army's first.
	That's what you serve. That's a big deal.
	But, you know, now you're pledging to army values first.
	And you're going to serve the army.
	And, you know, definitions are not even for West Point.
	I guess they might think they've got a definition of army values, but the politicians are going to keep redefining that.
	And by that, I mean the politicians in charge of West Point.
	Yet one more coup d'etat when they talk about extremism, even if it's only a relatively titchy one by the universal class.
	So that was Dr. James Alexander.
	It was a very good article. I really enjoyed that.
	One last thing here, and this is, well, we'll talk about this when we come back, because we've kind of got a long time here without a break.
	Is that what you said, a goof d'etat?
	Is that a goof d'etat?
	Oh, okay, for Trump. Instead of a toupee d'etat, a goof d'etat.
	That's even better. But actually, his supporters want to think that it was a goof d'etat.
	And we should still put him back in.
	He's just a fool. He's not a tool.
	It's okay if he doesn't know what he's doing.
	Let's real like Forrest Gump.
	Run, Forrest, run.
	Download our app or listen now at APSRadio.com.
	New World Order in music.
	One, two, three, four, five.
	All the unvaccinated are still alive.
	A little bit of Pfizer in my arm.
	A little bit of BioNTech does no harm.
	A little Johnson& Johnson does the trick.
	A little AstraZeneca so you don't get sick.
	It's booster number five.
	Yeah, we're on number nine.
	Number nine? Number nine? Travis says, I actually meant COVID itself.
	People jokingly called it the koof instead of the cough.
	Oh, okay. I thought we were talking about a hairstyle here.
	Learning lots of new words today, I guess.
	That's where we are.
	As always, the word of the day is koof, whatever that is.
	Try to use that five times a day so I can remember.
	Now, what I'm going to try to remember is that definitions are for schools, not for politicians.
	That's what I need to take away for today.
	And I like the thing about The Lion and the Fox, too.
	I've never actually read Machiavelli's Prince.
	I think it'd make me throw up.
	I never actually read Kafka's The Trial, either.
	I did go through 1984 and Brave New World.
	I thought they were giving us pornography when I was in high school.
	Brave New World. It's like, you're giving this to us to read?
	It's like, what is this about?
	Anyway. Mainstream measlemongers.
	This is from Brownstone.
	And they have exactly the same problem that I had with it.
	Mainstream measlemongers.
	If you've been following reports from mainstream media outlets lately, you could not have missed the Fourier stories about the resurgence of measles in Canada or in the U.S. Stern-looking public health officials with wrinkled brows are quoted as saying, we're about to be swallowed by a highly infectious disease that is vaccine-preventable.
	Actually, this is the next big thing to worry about.
	Or maybe not.
	By the old marketing adage, you don't sell the steak, you sell the sizzle.
	You can almost hear the charbroilers firing up in the measles stories.
	Like this one. Newsweek.
	Migrant measles cases spark fear of a wider outbreak.
	Or this CBC story.
	Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.
	How concerned should we be about measles?
	Or the Toronto Star?
	Measles rates are skyrocketing.
	Or the Vancouver Sun?
	Measles in Canada? What to know about rising cases and increased vaccine hesitancy?
	Noting, measle outbreaks in Europe and Canadian health officials are worried that spring break could reintroduce the highly infectious virus to Canada.
	I think there's another infectious type of stuff that they need to worry about more with spring break.
	Several of those STDs that are out there.
	From The Sun, UK. Parents to protect their children from measles surge as millions are at risk.
	Now, what they did not include in here is that one of the very first ones out there was Breitbart, as I pointed out, selling all of the fear.
	And also combining with it, as some of these others have pointed out, Newsweek says migrant measles cases spark fear of a wider outbreak.
	Breitbart used that to fear-monger about both the border and infectious diseases.
	Disease X could be disease M. Who knows?
	The M word.
	And then they went through and talked about, tried to get you scared about how serious measles were.
	Well, you may think that simply because somebody calls it a childhood disease, it's not a really dangerous thing, said Breitbart.
	I said, are you kidding me?
	It's called a childhood disease because everybody used to get these in childhood.
	And they survived. And they had lifetime immunity.
	And nobody worried about it.
	And then we had a listener send to me the Simpsons cartoon about that very thing.
	Somebody had cut it down and edited just the parts.
	It was a running part of one episode, so they cut it down to like three minutes, the part that was specific about the measles and a pox party and all the rest of the stuff.
	Everybody in the neighborhood brings their kids over and they have a pox party.
	Homer's the only one, the only adult who hadn't got it, and so he gets it and that.
	But again, you know, when we look at measles, it's going back to May 2019 all over again.
	Who else was it besides Breitbart and the mainstream media that was selling the idea that measles are really dangerous and we've got to stop this by whatever means.
	They have to get the shot, the vaccination.
	Yeah, May 2019. This is really going around now.
	They have to get their shot.
	Have to get the shots. And no exemptions.
	Trump is using that in May of 2019 to sell a vaccine mandate against medical and religious exemptions.
	Even against the wishes of religious schools.
	You had the Orthodox Jews in New York.
	They did not want to vaccinate their kids.
	A private religious school that had religious objections.
	And Trump said, you got to get the shot.
	It's really going around.
	You got to get it now.
	So there is a surprisingly consistent take-home message, says Brownstone.
	Here's the message. Measles is deadly.
	That's what that guy in the red tie was just telling you, right?
	Measles is deadly. Outbreaks are caused by too many unvaccinated children.
	And so we need to give more vaccines to everyone.
	And some of them conclude with, we need mandatory measles vaccination policies.
	And there's no room for nuance here.
	And that's exactly what he was defending.
	They've got to get the shots.
	You don't have any choice with this.
	There's no informed consent with this, said Trump.
	You've got to get these shots for all these reasons.
	It's deadly. You know, not getting the shot is the reason that there's an outbreak of this stuff.
	You know, bottom line is...
	Be afraid. Yeah.
	Be very afraid.
	Yeah, you've got to be very afraid.
	Be very afraid. And he was selling that to everybody.
	He was selling the fear. So be scared, be fearful, run, don't walk to the next clinic offering you or your kid a measles shot because you might not be up to date.
	What all these stories lack, typical of media outlets surfing a fear-mongering narrative is a sense of context, a short splash of history.
	And as I said, as I've been playing that Trump shot video for a long time, he's older than me.
	He knows that measles is not serious.
	He was an adult before they ever had a measles vaccine.
	He knows it's not essential.
	So this author says, how far back do you have to go in British Columbia, for example?
	It's Canadian. A Canadian province of 5 million people to see what measles look like.
	The last case in British Columbia was apparently in 2019, but you have to go back to 2018 to see a report from British Columbia Centers for Disease Control, their CDC. This would be the BC CDC. Before COVID, I guess is what it is, because we will all now mark time from the birth of the COVID virus.
	Pandemic here, not the birth of Christ.
	The short report makes illuminating reading.
	He says there were six cases of measles that year and a population of 5.1 million.
	Okay, he says, here's the math.
	If you lived in BC, British Columbia, you had a 1 in 850,000 chance of catching measles that year.
	There were no measles deaths.
	This is what I always point out. Oh, oh, oh.
	They panic about everything. You know the thing that kicked off Trump telling everybody they've got to get the shot.
	That was supposedly an outbreak that happened.
	Somebody flew in in California.
	I got spots on their face.
	Oh, no, it's measles. Quarantine everybody.
	Now we're going to have to make sure, you know, this is happening because some people haven't been taking their shots.
	It's like, no, they didn't have anything to do with it.
	But we're going to make everybody take the shots and we're going to ramp up the mandates in California.
	We're going to also do it in New York and all the rest of the stuff.
	So they had six cases.
	In a province that had 5.1 million, nobody died.
	You had a 1 in 850,000 chance of getting it.
	What do we know about the six cases that were reported?
	Of those six cases, half of them had two shots.
	One of them had one shot.
	And one had a history of childhood vaccines.
	They didn't really know. But, yeah, I got all my childhood vaccines, and so they would have gotten it.
	And I had reported on this story years ago.
	A similar thing happened in New York, except it wasn't six people.
	It was four people. And they had all been vaccinated, some of them more than once.
	They had the booster.
	And patient zero, of course, was vaccinated.
	I don't remember if they had one or two shots, because it really doesn't matter, does it?
	Didn't work. Those of us born before 1970 with personal experience pretty much all agree that measles is a big meh.
	That's what it stands for, the M. The meh, meh required.
	M-M-R. Meh, meh required.
	We all had it ourselves and so did our brothers, sisters, and school friends.
	We also had chicken pox and the mumps and we typically got a few days off of school.
	The only side effect of those diseases was that my mom sighed heavily and called into work to say she had to stay home.
	To look after a kid with spots.
	And that's what the Simpsons were saying then.
	So he says, so the measles vaccines were released in the early 1960s.
	But if we take the U.S. as an example, in 1955, there were 345 measles deaths in the U.S. population of 165 million.
	Wow, think about that.
	Our population has more than doubled since I was born.
	It was better before, I think.
	And we didn't have these poisonous shots here.
	But we had 345 people who died from measles.
	I never heard this.
	And neither did any of the parents who were bringing their kids around at pox parties.
	It was so rare, nobody paid any attention.
	That's a chance of one out of every 478,000 people with measles would die.
	And like I said, since I never heard of a measles death, a single one, do we know if these people died from measles or did they die with measles?
	Just like all the other stuff.
	Oh yeah, they got a positive PCR test and they died.
	Therefore... It's a pandemic of COVID. Others report that the U.S. death rate from measles pre-vaccine was about 1 in 10,000.
	They said, now the reason that this is likely an exaggeration, a gross exaggeration then, is because nobody would take their kids to the doctor unless they had some serious fever with this.
	And then if the kid had any kind of reaction other than just spots and itching, You take them to the doctor and only one out of 10,000 of them would die.
	That's what's going on with it.
	So, the true death rate in the entire population is likely much, much, much lower.
	They weren't testing everybody.
	I didn't see, my parents didn't bother to take me to a doctor with any of those childhood diseases.
	Let's face it, even a short trip back through history shows us that medical doctors were very blasé about measles.
	They describe it as a condition of short duration, moderate severity, low fatality.
	The best thing about getting it, of course, is a bonus to your immune system, as getting the real thing sets you up for near lifelong valuable immunity, unlike the shots.
	So what has changed?
	Well, what has changed is the money involved.
	What has changed is that we have this unholy alliance between government and pharmaceutical companies to increase power and money.
	It is a symbiotic relationship of a giant parasite, government pharma, and you are the host.
	We are told that globally, measles is a huge deal.
	Like any disease, it's certainly a bigger deal if you're poor and you don't get enough to eat.
	However, in 2019, the World Health Organization reported 839 cases in 23 states, comprising 328 million people, thus making the rate about 1 in 391,000.
	It's true that kids in poor countries can die from measles, yet they also die from everything else that kills poor, malnourished people living in countries without clean water, without sanitation, without functioning healthcare.
	Many infectious diseases, including measles, attack the most immune-compromised, who also happen to be the poorest, the least robust people on the planet.
	So, this is where we are now.
	And we have...
	It truly is a coup d'etat.
	This is why when I look at, and we're going to take a look at what is happening with money, I just barely talked about the Fed now, after denial, denial, denial, and even denial as this paper was being put on the desk of congressmen in the House.
	We had Powell in the Senate denying that they're doing anything about CBDC, and yet the paperwork that was put on the House desks said, that's one of our seven key duties is to put out CBDC. So we're going to talk about that.
	We're going to talk about what is happening, again, with the border with politics.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
	If you like the Eagles, on a dark desert highway, the cars, the And Huey Lewis and the News.
	You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com.
	You can download the full version of this song on our website.
	You can download the full version of this song on our website.
	Download the full version of this song on our website.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right, welcome back.
	And I have a comment on Rumble from Junk Silver.
	And thank you for the tip.
	I appreciate that. I got an ad on Rumble before this show with Trump saying how much he appreciated $5 and $10 contributions.
	I have to assume he was referring to this broadcast.
	Thanks for the suggestion, Donald.
	Yeah, that's what I said when I saw that.
	I had somebody send this ad to me that is running on Rumble.
	I was going to play this.
	Let's go ahead and play it now, since he brought it up.
	It shows a picture of this broadcast.
	It hit play. I am very humbly asking if you could chip in $5, $10, or even $25.
	I know that times could be tough, and they...
	Yeah, there you go. I told Karen, I said, so we need to run that out.
	We need to get some AI, get an AI voice and say, you know, $5, $10, or $25 for the David Knight Show.
	We don't get any money from that ad on Rumble.
	That's just something they're doing to pay for their overhead.
	And the contributions that you give...
	Are worth way, way more than any ads that you see on the podcast or anything like that, as I've said before.
	So we really do appreciate your support.
	I appreciate it, even more so than Donald Trump, because I have less money.
	Maybe, who knows, maybe his net worth will flip up.
	No, it won't. They're not going to get to him that much.
	I don't think I'm going to wind up with a bigger net worth than Donald Trump.
	He did have to go to zero, basically.
	But they're working pretty hard on that in New York.
	We'll talk a little bit about that coming up here.
	But I want to talk about real money versus CBDC. I mentioned this briefly yesterday.
	They declared that CBDC is a key duty, they said. And this is the paperwork that Tom Emmer, used to be the House whip, the number three guy. This is what he put up. I mentioned it yesterday but I did not show it. So I want to go back in more detail. Tom Emmer, he is the GOP majority whip still. He says, if you don't think the Fed is pursuing a CBDC, think
	The Fed gave this to my staff during a presentation earlier this Congress.
	They view CBDC as one of their key duties.
	And as I said, just look at this document here.
	Key duties of the Fed. And this is a spiral-bound notebook.
	You can't see it right now because it's off the screen, but there's actually tabs there to different areas of this report.
	So this comes from the Federal Reserve, describing what their key duties are in terms of payment systems.
	Currency, check collection, automated clearinghouse, wholesale payments.
	Under that, they put Fedwire Fund Service, fiscal agent of the U.S. government.
	Then they put FedNow and the CBDC, central bank digital currency.
	They spell it out for you right there.
	And so Congressman Emmer, who I pointed out, has been one of the key Whistleblowers about CBDC. He did, I think it was DeSantis who was the first one who did his, they called it Big Brother Digital Money, did a 20-minute presentation on it about CBDC and how they were going to stop it by changing the universal commercial code,
	the UCC. Do just the opposite of the legislation that's been sent out to half of the states saying, we want you to prohibit crypto and we want you to specifically mention that CBDC is legitimate currency.
	So he did exactly the opposite.
	Kristi Noem vetoed it.
	He did exactly the opposite.
	He held a press conference.
	This is when he was running for president.
	And the first question was all about Donald Trump and his indictment in New York.
	It's all just personal politics.
	Nobody cares about these existential issues that are going to affect each and every one of us on a very, very personal level.
	So he talked about that.
	Tom Emmer talked about it because Tom Emmer is very connected to the crypto industry.
	And people like Focahontas, who are selling CBDC, are really banker shills.
	She always presents herself as being against the banking industry.
	She's anything other than that.
	You know, Elizabeth Warren is against the banking industry, like Donald Trump is against globalism, okay?
	This is just a suit that they wear.
	You know, it's just the wool that the sheep put on as they're trying to pull the wool over your eyes as well.
	But anyway, Tom Emmer, March 14th, put out that tweet I just showed.
	He says, his office received it as Fed representatives were in Congress for a presentation, and it was as...
	You had Powell, head of the Fed, telling the Senate, no, CBDC is something that is nowhere near happening in any form.
	People don't need to worry about it, he told the Senate.
	The Fed Chairman, Jerome Powell.
	Yeah, don't worry about it.
	Don't worry about it. But it's one of their key duties.
	And that was just one week before he put this up.
	But people do need to worry the ability of the state to impose financial surveillance over the population.
	What is happening already in China in earnest?
	What has been bragged about by the World Economic Forum?
	What has been bragged about by our surrogates in Ukraine?
	You want to know what their vision for America is?
	Just take a look at Ukraine. Seriously.
	Everything about Ukraine. That's what the ruling class here, whether you're talking about Republicans or Democrats, what they want is They're on the same page, Republicans and Democrats in Ukraine.
	They want perpetual war.
	They want to destroy the society.
	Because they want to be part of a club, you know, just as Alexei Rostovich was saying, yeah, we're going to have a big war, and Ukraine is going to be devastated, but the good part of it is we get into NATO. What does he mean by we?
	No, he means that he gets to schmooze along with Zelensky and a few other people in the administration.
	They get to go to some big club, and that's why all of these people in all of the countries, regardless of what their stated political party or philosophy is, that's why they're all doing this.
	They want to devastate their countries.
	Because the good thing is, it's to their personal benefit, they get to get in the club.
	Whether the club is called NATO, or the UN, or the World Economic Forum, or whatever some new thing is that maybe they haven't even told us yet, they get in the club.
	We get devastated.
	That's what they want. And then they want to impose their digital society on us, and I've shown you that video multiple times, the vision of Ukraine 2030.
	Where everything you do is digitized.
	Everything you do is online.
	And the government is using technology to surveil and control everything that you do.
	What a dystopian nightmare.
	Yet it is sold as this is what we're having the war for.
	So that we can all live in this Orwellian digital surveillance state.
	So Trump has vowed to stop a U.S. CBDC. He described it as a dangerous threat to freedom.
	Well, he's right about that.
	The problem is that Jared Kushner, his son-in-law, and Steve Mnuchin, his Goldman Sachs banker that he put in charge of the Treasury Department, the two of them were sending emails back and forth about how we need to do this.
	This is great. How do we do this?
	So who do you believe?
	Do you believe they're private emails?
	Do you believe they're public statements as candidates?
	The Fed, despite its chair appearing to be convincing America that this is a danger, is in no way imminent, has had highly positioned officials like the vice chair of the Fed, Lael Brainard, Brainerd is reported as saying CBDC would reinforce a global dollar dominance, that it would be a safe central bank liability in the digital financial ecosystem.
	They see this, they're going to collapse the system.
	This is the way that they retain control with the new system.
	Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
	We had Bretton Woods, we had Bretton Woods 2, we had the petrodollar.
	Every time they reset this stuff, they want to make sure They get something that's different, but the common thing they think is always to keep themselves in charge.
	We have a globalist government, a government that wants to rule globally.
	And, of course, most of this stuff That is flowing through the U.N. World Economic Forum.
	It's really coming from the American government, the intelligence community, people like that.
	Just like this massive migration stuff, the money flows from the U.S. to the U.N. The U.N. then gives it to NGOs.
	The NGOs are organizing and, you know, paying the migrants to come, transporting them, all this stuff.
	But it begins in the United States.
	And so most of this stuff is that way as well.
	Unrumble, Empowered Solutions.
	Thank you very much for the tip. It says, here's my $5 Trump donation for you, David.
	Thank you. Well, gold is being spurred by Fed pricing.
	But as I pointed out, it's still below the inflation-adjusted peak.
	I said, if you go back and you look at where it was in 2012, you look at the inflation, then it's still slightly below, 3% below if you adjust it for the inflation.
	But see, I don't think that's the most important value of gold.
	As I said, for the longest time.
	You know, you've got this constantly fluctuating thing.
	The value of the dollar, you know, you've got gold, which, as we've pointed out many times with Tony Ardman when he comes on the show, we talk about how gold has retained its value.
	Go back and look at a century ago.
	What could you buy with gold?
	About the same amount that you could buy today.
	As a matter of fact, get a little bit more because, you know, things are manufactured a little bit more efficiently, cheaply, you know, with slave labor in China, that type of thing.
	But it's basically the same in terms of its purchasing power over about a century.
	Can't say the same thing about the dollar.
	And so when you try to evaluate gold in terms of this fantasy paper money, Which is constantly fluctuating based on what?
	Based on what the Fed says it's about to do.
	Is the Fed going to raise rates or lower the rates?
	Oh, well, now the dollar is going to be more expensive relative to gold and less expensive.
	Or you look at the inflation rate.
	They tell you what the inflation rate is.
	They tell you what the interest rates are going to be.
	I don't look at it from that perspective.
	My interest personally in gold has simply been about the CBDC thing.
	We need to preserve what Catherine Austin Fitz says, financial privacy for transactions.
	Financial transactional privacy.
	That's what we need to be able to preserve.
	The ability to have private transactions.
	And that's the key thing.
	She also places a premium on something that is physical rather than digital.
	Because digital is becoming the substrate for tyranny.
	And it presents so many different risks that way.
	So I don't look at it necessarily as an inflation hedge.
	I mean, it certainly has been an inflation hedge over the last century or so.
	But I look at it as a way to...
	To hedge on this digital tyranny.
	And by the way, I want to always thank Tony Ardman for his support.
	Been a big supporter of this program for a very long time, from the beginning.
	And he has set up davidknight.gold.
	If you go there, that'll take you to Tony Ardman and let him know that you're coming through me, through the show.
	And he'll get any kind of gold or silver transactions that you want, large or small.
	Plus, he'll also help you to purchase it gradually on a regular basis, and he's got a lot of different levels for that.
	He calls it Wolfpack. By doing it on a regular basis, what he's doing is he's allowing people to get the power of a group buy so that he can get a better price on the gold and silver for the group.
	So a lot of different reasons to join Wolfpack.
	It's also a community there. But it even goes down to a child's level, like $35 a month.
	And that's got some nice little trinkets in there that are a lot of fun.
	So if you want to train a grandchild or something about the value of money, they've also got some toys and things like that they put in there.
	Congressional progressives, meanwhile, are trying to help the price of gold.
	And I would say a Bitcoin as well.
	They want to cut the rates. Cut the interest rates now.
	They're starting to feel the heat from the election.
	And so they are putting pressure on the Fed to cut rates.
	And guess what? It's the usual suspects out there.
	People like Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, all of the economic experts in the Congress.
	No, all the Marxists in the Congress.
	All the people like Elizabeth Warren, as I said before, pretending to be against the big banks when she's actually the surrogate for the big banks.
	In a letter to the Fed Chair, Jerome Powell, Sanders and Warren joined 19 House Democrats in calling for, quote, a prompt timeline for future rate reductions.
	Well, here's your timeline for the rate reductions.
	We got an election in November.
	You know there's going to be several rate cuts before then.
	Noting that the central bank has hiked rates 11 times since March of 2022, and that inflation has nearly fallen into line with the Federal Reserve's target, according to the cooked books.
	I mean, you know, they're basing all this stuff on their inflation numbers and on their unemployment numbers.
	And we know how the government manipulates all that stuff, just like they do the COVID numbers.
	If the feds wait too long to begin cutting rates, lawmakers cautioned, overly restrictive monetary policy could reduce employment and real wage growth.
	It could reduce their employment as politicians because they could lose the election.
	Are they going to talk about cutting taxes or anything?
	Oh, no, not these guys.
	No, they're not going to talk about cutting taxes or cutting spending.
	They just want rates cut.
	Easy money. That's what they want.
	And we know what happens with that.
	And we have known what's going to happen with that for quite some time.
	We now see this commercial real estate thing playing out in a number of different ways.
	As I said the other day, my pal was saying, yeah, I think we're going to have about 500 banks fail.
	And no big deal.
	It's not going to be the big banks, the ones that matter.
	It'll be the small and medium-sized banks.
	San Francisco's Four Seasons Hotel investors.
	Now, $3 million late on the loan and foreclosure is looming.
	Westbrook Partners acquired San Francisco Four Seasons Luxury Hotel building as they have now been served notice of default.
	The developer has been behind in payments since December.
	Currently behind by more than $3 million.
	The bank is going to be left holding that bad loan.
	They've got 90 days to bring their account current with a lender or face foreclosure.
	Well, I don't think anything's really going to change.
	As the San Francisco Gate noted, local tourism continues to suffer thanks to the city's legendary mismanagement.
	This resulted in overlapping drug, crime, and homelessness crises.
	Last summer, said the San Francisco Gate, the owner of San Francisco's Hilton Union Square and Park 55 hotels abandoned their loans in the first major default.
	Now this is happening with the Four Seasons.
	They said the short term is a very challenging situation due to high interest rates, fewer guests compared to pre-pandemic and the relatively high costs attached with doing business here, they said.
	According to the Chronicle, San Francisco's 2024 convention calendar is much lighter than it was last year.
	People are staying away from the crime-ridden city and going to Las Vegas for the conventions.
	But Wall Street is looking at the real estate time bomb, the other TikTok that's out there, right?
	With a typical U.S. commercial lease ranging from three to five years, The clock is ticking for office and retail property, says the Hill, and their creditors and the financial sector, as remote work has taken off and prompted changes in urban land use.
	Yeah, it's not only remote work, But it's also things like universal basic income.
	These are Trump precedents from the Trump lockdown that are running through this.
	Powell delivered much the same message to the Senate Banking Committee last week.
	He said, this is a problem we'll be working on for years more, I'm sure.
	There will be bank failures, he said.
	This is not a first-order issue for any of the very large banks.
	So we don't really have to care about it.
	The only ones they care about is it.
	Half dozen, too big to fail, too big to jail banks.
	They're going to be fine. Matter of fact, they'll swallow up what's left of the other ones and they'll be even stronger than before because they'll have more money.
	And then that handful, the dirty dozen, dirty half dozen, will work with the Fed to impose a CBDC system on you when you've got nowhere else to go with the small and medium-sized banks.
	He says it's more the smaller, medium-sized banks that have these issues.
	He says we're going to get through it.
	I think it is manageable is the word that I would use, said Powell.
	So Westwood Capital Managing Partner told the Hill, I think Powell's statement was a little bit simplistic.
	There will be disruptions.
	How those resolve themselves, either with help from the government or with outside capital, I believe it's going to be very, very different.
	This is interesting. Listen to this.
	I believe it's going to be very, very different than what we saw with the three banks that failed last year, and certainly with what we saw with any of the other crises.
	We're not going to see a lot of commercial construction either in the economy for a decade or two.
	And this is going to be a big negative on the macro level, macroeconomic level.
	Again, another precedent set by Trump with the panic lockdown.
	But they call it COVID, or they call it the pandemic.
	No, it's the policies.
	The policies. None of these policies were necessary.
	It's the policies that are doing this.
	One person says, COVID really shifted our view of how a city can operate and where its centers of gravity are.
	No, it was what Trump did with the globalist lockdown.
	Something that had never been done before.
	Something for which he had no authority to do.
	But he paid everybody to do it.
	And that deficit for where he bribed all the governors, that's another aspect of this.
	The universal basic income taste that people got.
	The trillions of dollars of bribery and corruption and waste and fraud and abuse.
	All of this stuff coming together.
	In February, about 28% of paid work days in the U.S. were work-from-home days, down from more than 60% at the height of the pandemic.
	But quadruple their level from before the pandemic.
	So, you had 7% of the people that were roughly, you know, were doing this before the pandemic, now 28%.
	The pandemic, again, I'm not going to blame it on any politicians.
	Let's not say the name here.
	Because, you know, if we do, I just had somebody, there was a Subscribestar supporter, said, okay, sent me a message, stopped it and sent me a message.
	Said, I'm done with you.
	Just too much Trump derangement here.
	I said, I don't have the ability to respond, but if I did, I'll respond here.
	I'll say, well, I'll pray that you get over your Trump derangement.
	Because that's a big problem.
	This idolatry, this derangement, this strong delusion, that this guy who did all this stuff, who kicked all this stuff off, somehow going to make it all right, and he's not going to do it again?
	Are you kidding me? Are you that stupid?
	Are you that deluded?
	Self-deluded? Seriously?
	By the way, you know, I didn't kind of make any, you think I'm, you give me a contribution and I appreciate it, but do you think that a $5 or $10 contribution or whatever it was, I don't even remember what level the person was, do you think a contribution is going to change what I say?
	I didn't lie to people to keep my job.
	Are you kidding me? The pandemic, not Trump, but the pandemic, permanently increased work from home.
	A 2023 survey by public opinion research agency Pew found that 35% of workers who work remotely chose to do so all the time.
	That is up from 7% before the pandemic, though down from its peak of 55% in 2020.
	Now, this is a story that's going to be written with a different country before too much longer.
	Germany is running out of money and debt levels are exploding.
	And you're going to see this repeated with USA there instead of Germany.
	This is the country's finance minister.
	A German finance minister is warning his own government that state finances are quickly growing out of hand.
	And the government needs to change course and implement austerity measures.
	I interviewed David Stockman, who wrote the book Trump's War on Capitalism.
	He was warning people that the Office of Management and Budget, during the exploding deficit under Reagan, said we need to do something about this.
	And he was right then, and he's right now.
	And what he was talking about in terms of Trump's war on capitalism were the things that he had done prior to the lockdown.
	He had sown the seeds of this stuff.
	Everybody was having a big time, a big party.
	Oh, it was great.
	You know, it's just this is, this is like everybody, everybody looking at the New Year's Eve party where everybody's getting drunk.
	And then the next day when the hangover hits everybody and they go, who did this to me?
	I don't know how this happened.
	It was, the seeds were sown that night during the party.
	And so, you know, you just have lots of deficit spending and party, party, party.
	Here's a stimulus check. You want another one?
	Yeah, sure, let's do it.
	I'm writing checks all the time.
	No problem. Well, eventually it comes home to roost.
	But then it got even worse in 2020.
	And then, of course, he blamed it all on COVID. The government in Germany has been in crisis mode, sought to cut the budget in a number of areas, including against the country's farmers.
	That's where they're going to go first, right?
	Is that really where the problem is?
	Did they suddenly have a big explosion in the number of farmers?
	No, they got a big explosion in the number of migrants.
	And the migrants are not producing food.
	They're not producing anything. They're on welfare.
	But we're going to cut the farmers and the subsidies to farmers.
	Always in the past, the European Union has heavily subsidized their farmers because they wanted to prioritize.
	They considered that to be one of the key things they had to make sure they had food, that they were not dependent on other countries for food, that they could grow it themselves.
	And so they would give heavy subsidies to the farmers.
	Now they're cutting this significantly.
	They want fewer farmers because they don't want what is best for their own people.
	They want dependency on people like Gates, on Bezos, these other people who are doing, you know, lab food and all the rest of this.
	So the cuts have already sparked mass protest, but they're not going to cut illegal immigration.
	They're not going to cut welfare expenses.
	They're going to cut farming.
	Is it possible? Is it even possible that they could be that stupid?
	No, of course not.
	They're not that stupid.
	You know, just like Trump's not that stupid.
	But that's the excuse that people will give for that.
	This is a globalist government in Germany that is at war with its citizens, just like all of these G20 countries are.
	They're all at war with their citizens.
	Including our own. And it doesn't matter which party is in power.
	As a matter of fact, when you look at this, tax revenues are shrinking.
	The social welfare system is growing due to the country's exploding immigrant population.
	Mass immigration to Germany will cost taxpayers up to 19 trillion euros, warns a top academic expert.
	It's not the farms that's exploding in costs.
	It's the immigration and the welfare.
	It's the welfare magnet bringing in migrants to come and live off of that.
	Who's going to feed them when they don't have farmers?
	Well, they'll eat the soylent green, I guess, or whatever else is there.
	Canada, meanwhile, is putting in an open banking system.
	Now, what is that? This is something else you're going to start hearing more and more about.
	This is a term that is going around.
	All it is is just opening up your data and To any and every tech company that would like to look at it.
	To any and every financial service that would like to look at it.
	To the government that would like to snoop on your bank account all the time.
	Of course, they already have access to looking at it.
	But they call that open banking.
	And they say it's part of an open society.
	Who is it that talks all the time about open society?
	Oh, that's right, Soros.
	That's what he calls it, his open society there.
	These are new rules that would allow banks to access control of customers' personal and financial data.
	And to give that personal and financial data to third-party people, it would allow the banks to sell your data.
	And then those banks, the people who get it as third parties, they'll do things like GM and Ford are selling your data about how you drive and how much you drive and the way you drive and all the rest of this stuff.
	They're sharing that with insurance companies, and they're getting handsomely paid.
	And then insurance companies use that as justification to raise your insurance rates.
	By the way, when somebody gets into financial difficulty...
	Credit card companies will raise the already criminal rates that they charge people on credit cards.
	They'll raise those if somebody gets a big medical bill or something.
	Oh, okay. Well, now we're going to go from, you know, 20% to 35% on your credit card.
	Just like that. You're not behind on credit card bills.
	Nothing has happened with that. But if your credit rating goes down or, you know, you've got some medical bills or something, they instantly jump up the rates on your credit card.
	That's criminal. You don't have any politicians talking about these kind of existential issues, do you?
	Anybody running for office talking about this stuff?
	No. And so, in the same way, you know, the insurance companies, it's like, oh, well, we got an excuse because somebody has, they do it as well.
	It's not just the credit card companies, it's insurance companies.
	Uh-oh, something happened to your credit?
	Okay, now we're going to raise your insurance rates.
	I haven't had an accident. Well, I know, but we're going to use that as an excuse.
	So they use the data that they get from GM and Ford as an excuse to raise your interest rates.
	What do you think is going to happen when Canada passes this open banking regulation and they start sharing this data with all kinds of people?
	They're going to start raising every kind of price for a service that they wish.
	They said, well, it'll help people if they want to try to get a loan.
	If you get a home loan...
	You sign a piece of paper saying you can look at my bank account and see what I've got in there.
	They don't need to do this.
	That is a complete lie and obfuscation about the real reason they want to do this.
	They want to be able to sell your data, and then these other people are going to use that to charge you more and more or to deny you services.
	They're going to use this like a social credit score.
	Well, the government's already got this.
	The government is already debanking people, but it'll be another excuse for them to do this.
	This began in the UK. Now it's going to Canada.
	It's going to be another one of these global conspiracies.
	We've been boosting the open banking profiles of some of the biggest names in the industry for over three years, says this organization that is pushing it.
	This organization calls itself the open banking excellence a forum for the people who are going to be exploiting this and coming together so I said the largest the most engaged community of open banking and open finance pioneers in the world from thin techs and banks to regulators and big techs Our community gathers learn share stories spark debate and collaborate They steal they lie
	They've got applications for this, as Pompeo said about the CIA. Well, you can say the same thing about the bankers.
	So we went to West Point.
	They told us we don't lie, we don't steal, we don't tolerate people who do.
	I went to the CIA, and they said, well, we lie, we cheat and steal, and we have classes on all that stuff.
	Well, that's what this organization is.
	It's classes for how all the big companies and the tech companies can lie to you and steal from you.
	The organization Open Banking Excellence is a World Bank partner.
	They said it's about having fair, more inclusive, more open society, just like Soros.
	It's about democratizing data.
	Predatory, predatory.
	Everything they do is about getting data about you.
	Makes them money.
	Canada is one of many nations hoping to use unofficial social scores to control the masses.
	With all of this stuff, with this open banking, they're setting the stage again for CBDCs, which is where we began this, talking about money.
	And so we already see this as they have begun debanking individuals.
	They've gotten now, they're getting people accustomed to the fact that if somebody doesn't like what you have to say, if they hate your speech, they can throw you in prison.
	They can kick you off of social media.
	Well, if they can, first they begin kicking you off of social media.
	Now they're talking about throwing people in prison and all the rest of the stuff.
	But of course, that'll also include, if they can kick you off of social media, they can debank you.
	And that is already being done to a lot of us who have programs like this.
	You know, I was kicked out by PayPal and Venmo that they on.
	No explanation given after doing this show for five months independently.
	They shut me down for PayPal.
	I can't use it for anything.
	That's coming to everybody.
	You know, I don't get any attention for it because I'm not Nigel Farage.
	They haven't reversed anything.
	They haven't given me any information, but I know exactly what it is.
	I'd have to be pretty stupid not to know at this point what it is since I've been talking about it for years.
	We'll be right back.
	Hear news now at APSradionews.com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story.
	Music playing.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	you All right. On Rumble, Mark, thank you very much for the tip.
	He says, what do you think of using credit unions?
	I've used credit unions in the past.
	I think of them as the same way I think of a small or medium-sized bank.
	You know, they typically have really good loans, rates, and things like that.
	When we came here, we've used a small local bank.
	Because I want to deal with small local bank or credit union.
	But, you know, the credit union, usually there's got to be some kind of a connection there.
	Sometimes they'll make it a little bit easier to get into them.
	But, you know, it might be you're a state employee or the military or something like that.
	But they were close to us and they also supported Zelle.
	And that was an important thing.
	We have a lot of people who contribute to the program via Zelle, and I'm way behind in reading the names off and thanking people, but I really do appreciate that.
	It's become an important source of income for us through that venue because it comes in right away and it comes in without any attached fees.
	And so I want to make sure that we had a bank That used Zelle.
	But yeah, I think credit unions are great.
	And again, you know, they're not a part of the big banking cartel of the dirty half dozen the government has worked with to create.
	Newark City. A homeowner arrested for changing locks after the house was taken over by squatters.
	This is truly amazing.
	They don't respect the rule of law.
	So, of course, they don't respect...
	Private property. They don't respect deeds or anything else.
	I mean, of course, if you've got a government like you do in New York City or many other places like that, if they don't respect the law, they're not going to respect these deeds either.
	A woman who inherited a home in New York City that was full of people squatting illegally was arrested and led away in handcuffs after she changed the locks.
	They put her in handcuffs and took her away for changing the locks.
	This is in Flushing, Queens.
	She said it's enraging.
	It's not fair that I, as the homeowner, have to be going through this.
	She was in the process of selling the home last month, but then realized that squatters had moved in and brazenly replaced the entire front door and locks.
	Fed up, she recently went to her family's home with the local TV outlet in tow and called a locksmith to change the locks for her, reports the New York Post.
	Then she got into a spat with the squatters, which was caught on camera, rapidly erupted into a verbal altercation until the cops showed up and arrested her and charged her with unlawful eviction.
	One person, Colin Rugg, said, New York City homeowner gets arrested after changing the locks on her own home after it got taken over by squatters.
	Said, never do business in New York.
	In New York City, anyone can simply claim squatter's rights after 30 days of living at a home, which isn't even enough time for the homeowner to realize what is going on.
	But it's not just New York.
	This is something that's happening in a lot of different places.
	This happened in Texas as well.
	Goatree told me about it, and then I had him on one day.
	He mentioned it again briefly on air.
	An employee of his.
	Had this happen.
	He was out of town for a while on a job and he comes back and somebody has broken into his house and has been living there for a while.
	And, you know, he calls the police to evict a lot of people that moved in.
	I think they were illegal immigrants, but nevertheless, there was a bunch of people that were there.
	They called the police. The police said, well, we can't evict them.
	I'm not going to get involved in a property dispute.
	I don't know if these people are legitimate tenants or not.
	I've just got your word versus them.
	It's like, well, I've got the deed to the house here.
	Well, yeah, but if this is a dispute between, if you rented this to them, and this is a, you know, you're the owner of the house, but I don't know that you didn't rent this to them, and then you want me to evict them without going through the process of evicting them?
	I'm not going to do anything about it.
	He was absolutely flabbergasted.
	However, in this particular case, you know, Goatree and the people who work for him, they are white hat cyber hackers.
	And, you know, they do jobs for corporations and find the vulnerabilities and explain to them that this is what we found.
	You know, we were able to break in and this is what you need to fix to keep that from happening, keep real criminals from doing it.
	So people pay them to find vulnerabilities.
	He had all kinds of stuff in his house that was wired.
	And they had a field day with these people.
	Thought the house was screaming.
	Waking up in the middle of the night with Yoko Ono screaming at the top of her lungs in this house and many other things happening.
	Lights turning on and off. They eventually went out of there screaming, thinking that...
	There's really seriously wrong with this house.
	They got them out that way.
	They could not get them out using the law.
	And so it's not just New York.
	This is something you have to look at in all different states.
	It truly is an issue.
	You've got somebody who's living in your house.
	You call the police.
	They say, well, I don't know if you've got some agreement with them.
	I'm not going to evict them if you haven't gone through an eviction process if you had an agreement before.
	They don't require...
	The people living there show them, but see, I've got a deed.
	Do they have a rental agreement?
	They don't require that. So the New York Post says people can claim squatters' rights if they've been squatting for only 30 days at a property.
	This makes it illegal for the homeowner to change the locks, to turn off the utilities.
	You've got to keep paying the utilities.
	Or to remove the belongings of the squatters.
	By the time someone does their investigation, their work, and their job, it will be over 30 days, and this man will still be in my house, said the homeowner.
	I'm really fearful that these people are going to get away with stealing my home.
	During the recent encounter at her home, she was armed with the deeds, and she was filmed entering the property after one of the apparent tenants left the front door open.
	So... After she changed the locks, a man claiming to be on a lease, identified by the local outlet as Brian Rodriguez, returned to the property and barged through the front door.
	She said, you should not be trying to steal my house on camera.
	Following the flurry of 911 calls, responding cops told her she had to sort out the saga in housing court because we're going to consider this to be a landlord-tenant issue.
	As the Post further reports, this is the latest such incident, comes weeks after a couple's plan to move into a $2 million home in Queens with their disabled son was derailed by a squatter who claimed to have an agreement with the previous owner.
	Yeah, these people bought the house, they closed on the house, they go to move in, they've got a disabled son, and there's somebody living there.
	It's like, what's going on with this?
	Well, I've got an agreement with the previous owner.
	He didn't have an agreement. Another incident, a squatter turned a Rockaway's home into a house of horrors with over a dozen emaciated cats and dogs trapped inside.
	Yeah, it truly is a mess.
	It's a mess renting stuff to people, but this is a situation where you don't even rent anything to them.
	Meanwhile, Bezos is demonizing farmers.
	They want to evict farmers off their land.
	And they have a scheme for this, of course, to make a lot of money selling their bug meat.
	And this is at Aspen.
	They have the Aspen Ideas Climate.
	And Jeff Bezos' girlfriend, Lauren Sanchez, who now has another title.
	Um, she didn't like it.
	Bezos Earth Fund Vice Chair.
	That's now what she's calling herself.
	She announced an initial $60 million commitment to establish Bezos Centers for Sustainable Protein as part of the Bezos Earth Fund.
	$1 billion commitment to food transformation.
	She says the food transformation she's talking about is plant-based lab-grown meat.
	Well, it ain't meat then.
	But of course, you know, definitions are for schools, not for politicians or billionaire scammers.
	They don't go by the definition of meat that you and I have.
	As somebody used to say, one of our favorite sayings is that plants are not food, they're what food eats.
	Yeah. Financing the future, a seismic shift in financial strategies from billions to trillions globally to address the climate crisis.
	These people are just conmen, grifters, and hucksters.
	So, according to her biography, she is dedicated to fighting climate change.
	I thought you just thought she was Jeff Bezos' girlfriend, right?
	And the protection of nature.
	She's focusing now on deforestation and global warming.
	And again, we have to ask what the definition is of deforestation.
	Because now, for the longest time, these people are concerned somebody's cutting the trees down.
	But now, Bail Gates wants to actually cut the trees down and get paid for doing that.
	First, pay me for planting the trees, then pay me to cut the trees down.
	And so I had to look at this to see, you know, where is she going?
	Is she pro-tree or is she anti-tree?
	Well, it turns out at this point in time, since she's new to all this stuff, when she talks about deforestation, she's talking about losing the trees.
	And so she wants to be paid to plant trees.
	But listen to this. They've got a new satellite, right?
	That just went up the beginning of March, March the 4th.
	She says, I don't know if you know this, but think about this.
	Methane has caused 30% of global warming.
	So they're focused on CO2, which is not a problem, to get rid of cars and, of course, power plants.
	Now when they want to get rid of food, they're going to focus on methane.
	She says, so how are we going to fix this methane stuff, right?
	Got to get rid of the cows and all the rest of the stuff.
	How are we going to fix this?
	She said, this is how.
	We're going to start right here with, drumroll, methane sat.
	Methane sat. Methane sat?
	Sounds like a whoopee cushion she's selling or something.
	What was that noise?
	Was that methane when you sat down?
	No, that's a whoopee cushion. No, this is a satellite...
	That is now going to be monitoring methane emissions everywhere.
	So now they're going to have a metric that they can hector people about.
	Look at this. Here's our picture of methane being emitted from a cow or a factory or whatever.
	Methane. It's kind of like when they first looked over the polar caps and they said, we've got a hole in the ozone layer.
	Has it always been there? I don't know.
	I never looked before, but I think we should be concerned about this.
	It's like, well, you've never looked before.
	How do you know this isn't perfectly normal?
	Get a hole in the...
	Anyway, it's in the ozone.
	It's like, I'm supposed to be concerned about this?
	It's the first time you've ever looked at it, and you think that there should be no hole, and there is a hole in the ozone layer.
	And so now we've all got to change the way we air condition our homes.
	By the way, the Marxist mayor of Paris...
	Has just informed the athletes who are going to be participating in the summer Olympics that they're not going to have any air conditioning Anyway just who is gonna be watching that at this point in time anyway So they will regularly monitor 50 major regions accounting for more than 80% of global oil and gas production.
	Now they're going to be focusing on farms.
	They put up a satellite up there to give them a metric to ban more farms.
	So, it's going to be a spy operation.
	They're going to be spying on cows.
	This truly is.
	I can just see them doing maybe the Bezos Foundation.
	The people selling you lab meat, maybe they'll get these, take a page out of Chick-fil-A's publication.
	Maybe they'll have some cows standing on two legs, holding a crudely written sign saying, eat more of the bugs.
	Not chicken, but bugs.
	She said, I'm thrilled to announce tonight $60 million to establish Bezos Center for Sustainable Protein.
	That will help to grow these ideas.
	We will make plant-based, lab-grown meats cheaper, healthier, and tastier.
	These sustainable proteins really are getting better.
	She said, trust me.
	She actually said, trust me.
	So while this is all happening, the U.S. has lost 141,000 farms in five years.
	It's roughly equivalent to the size of Maine.
	Imagine if all Maine were farms, that all disappears.
	This is from a census of the U.S. Department of Agriculture for 2022.
	The total number of farms in the United States declined by 7%.
	The acreage that is being farmed declined by 2.2%, which is still very significant.
	That 2.2% decline is what is roughly the size of Maine.
	And so you see that if the amount of land that is being farmed declines by 2.2, the number of farms declines by 7%.
	What's happening here? Consolidation.
	Consolidation. And the USDA says, but that's good because that means that, you know, we have actually increased agricultural production by 40%, but that's about the value of it.
	That doesn't necessarily mean the quantity of it, but the price of it.
	How much of that is inflation?
	This massive decline of farms follows a steady decline of farms year over year since the 1950s.
	If you look at what happened since 1950, one of the charts of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, actually this is from the Farm Bureau.
	And so since 1950, the number of farm operations has declined by 3.75 million.
	It's declined by 66%.
	So only about a third of the independent farms are still there.
	In terms of the number of acres, it's declined by 28.9, so 29%.
	And that is twice the size of Texas.
	Twice the size of Texas.
	We used to have that much more farmland.
	You want to wonder why people are eating processed food?
	Why the prices are so much higher?
	Before we take a break, our guest is ready, and we're going to be talking to...
	It's going to be an interesting conversation.
	We're going to be talking to someone who has just filed a court case for the Florida Supreme Court...
	There's a lot of different jurisdictions in Florida where they're concerned about these bioweapon jabs.
	You've got a lot of different counties in Florida that have identified them as a bioweapon.
	And the next step is to try to get the governor, DeSantis, to stop the distribution of this deadly bioweapon.
	And that's what he's doing with his Supreme Court case.
	So I'm interested to talk to him to get an update on that.
	But before we go to the break, there's this one more thing I want to cover.
	And this is from, for a love of the road, long-term supporter, asked this question on Subscribestar.
	No, I'm sorry, I sent this by email.
	He said, you mentioned the Amish and talks about the point in the program, which I talked about, and why they live, how they do.
	He said, it made me think, how will CBDC affect the Amish?
	Because I know they still deal in cash.
	They have to pay people who drive them various places.
	He says, that's what my ex-girlfriend's parents do.
	They get paid by the Amish to take them around various places.
	He says, I guess I'll have to go barter instead.
	Or will they get digital wallets?
	I think they will never go with digital wallets because the whole philosophy of what they did in terms of freezing at a certain point, it wasn't like there's something magical about the technology of a carriage, but what is magical about it is that they don't have to depend on anybody outside of their community to have a carriage that works.
	They can have a horse and they can have a carriage and they can fix all that within their community.
	And that's the goal. That's why they live the way they do in terms of implements and things like that.
	They have to have, they want to make sure that they are not intertwined and dependent on the outside world.
	And I think there's a lot of wisdom in that.
	Frankly, I think they're going to be in a great position.
	Their products, their food products or other things are going to become more and more in demand, I think.
	But beyond that, We're good to go.
	And who knows? Maybe after other people learn some of these skills, that community might grow.
	They may not have the same religious beliefs as the Amish, but I think that community could grow.
	And I think when you start talking about having actual skills, like the Amish do, being able to build things, being able to grow things, being able to make their own clothes, all the rest of the stuff, that kind of self-sufficiency and the ability to barter stuff that they make as well as their knowledge, I think that's better than gold, quite frankly.
	It's better than anything that you can have.
	The skills are a really key thing, and so I think they're going to be in a good position for that.
	As far as having to pay people to take them places, that's where we're going to be, because they want to get rid of all cars.
	It isn't just about getting rid of internal combustion engines.
	They want to get rid of all cars.
	Biden is fine if he burns down the automobile industry with cheap cars from China, because he doesn't want anybody having a car.
	Electric or otherwise.
	Okay, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk to Dr.
	Joseph Sansone.
	If I'm pronouncing his name correctly, we'll find out.
	And we will be right back.
	Stay with us. The Common Man.
	They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com If you like the Eagles...
	The Cars. And Huey Lewis and the News.
	You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSRadio.com.
	Alright, welcome back and joining us now is somebody I'm anxious to talk to.
	He was recommended to me by James Roguski and I really do respect the work that James Roguski has done in terms of keeping an eye on the World Health Organization and the shenanigans that they're playing there with the treaty and the changing of the international health regulations and things like that.
	He says you need to get this guy on and talk about what is happening in Florida.
	This is Dr. Joseph Sansone, and you can find him on Substack.
	His last name is spelled S-A-N-S-O-N-E, josephsansone.substack.com is where you'll find him.
	But I want to talk about what he's doing in Florida, find out what is happening in Florida, and kind of get the background of that with the vaccine.
	So joining us now is Dr.
	Sansone. Thank you for joining us.
	Thanks for having me on, David.
	It's an honor. You know, James Rogoski called me up, and he's like, after I did this rid of May Damus, he's like, Joe, you forgot to put the kitchen sink in there.
	And we'll get a little more into that, but I'll give you a little of the background leading up to this.
	So, I guess, in a sense, I started in May of 2021 working on Getting the first ban-to-jab resolution passed in February of 2023.
	And that was at the county-level Republican Party where we passed the resolution declaring COVID injections to be biological and technological weapons calling on the governor to prohibit their distribution and the attorney general to confiscate the vials and conduct a forensic analysis.
	Now, that was big at the time because everybody was still trying to argue against mandates.
	Now, as a psychotherapist, I like to say I'm a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism, which is pretty much our whole world today.
	So as a psychotherapist, I specialize in clinical hypnosis.
	So I'm looking at this from like an Ericksonian hypnosis point of view, and I'm like, well, wait a minute.
	The embedded command in there is that it's not a bioweapon.
	So I'm like, you can't debate whether you're going to mandate a bioweapon or not.
	It's a biological and technological weapon.
	So we want to shift that debate.
	And we got a little national news when we did that first resolution, but then what happened is PR Newswire, they censored our press release.
	Oh, wow. On an actual vote of one of the two major parties.
	Now, it's at the county level, but this is something we voted on and passed with like 80-90% of the vote.
	I remember when that happened.
	Hey, look at this. Yeah, because I got on Stu Peters a couple big things, but then it got blacked out.
	Yeah, I remember that.
	There was a vote at the county level saying this is a bioweapon.
	That's great. And you know what?
	I think... When people start doing this, I don't think, I know, that this has an effect on people like DeSantis and his Surgeon General.
	They look at this kind of stuff, and if this happens in one county, but it's happened in more than one county, and say, hmm, maybe we need to do something about this.
	So that's where this starts, and this is a bottom-up solution we always talk about.
	How important that is for people to get together, focus on an issue, and do something, and you might be able to get local politicians to join you, and if you get enough local politicians to join you, that'll put pressure on the state politicians to do something as well.
	That's a perfect example.
	Right, and if they don't join us, we'll drag them along kicking and screaming if we have to.
	So we did that first resolution, and then since then we've passed 10 county parties have passed this resolution.
	And so we've gotten no response from the governor because they get notified when the counties pass these resolutions.
	Then in the summer, I sent the grand jury petition, what we had at National Arm, that David Meiswinkel wrote, and we'll talk about that a little later, but I sent that evidence to them, and that's also calling for the injections to be taken off the market, too. All 67 county sheriffs, all 20 state attorneys, the governor, the attorney general, no response.
	Not even like, we'll look into this, nothing.
	And then I sent it again in a flash drive, certified mail, because in Florida, email is public record, so you kind of got them on record.
	But I sent in certified mail in October, again, calling for them to take the shots off, no response.
	And so, what I did is, and this has, you're right, this has had an influence, because I think it helped move the Surgeon General to take the actions he wanted to do.
	Because in January 3rd of this year, the Florida Department of Health has called for a halt to these injections, and has said that they're an adulterated product, a threat to the human genome, and Surgeon General Lattipos went as far as saying that these are the antichrist of drugs.
	So, yeah. Here's what happened.
	Before that, first he said, well, we shouldn't be giving this to kids because the benefit risk is not there.
	So he started moving in that way in a little bit, and then as you point out, he says, no, these things are now an adulterated product.
	And he's absolutely right. I mean, that is...
	You know, that is one of the things, not the worst thing about it, but that was kind of a mild criticism, but it should be a disqualifying criticism, and that has been shown and tested.
	And boy, the pushback that he got from the national media and political parties and everything was just tremendous.
	That's why it's important to keep pushing from the bottom like you're doing.
	Yeah, exactly. And I'll get to the adulterated thing in a little bit because you're right.
	That is very important for what we're doing.
	And so then what happens is I sent them a final demand letter in early February.
	No response. I sent that to the certified mail to the Attorney General and to the Governor.
	No response. And, um, so then finally, uh, I filed this writ of mandamus in the Supreme Court of Florida on, uh, I think I did it on March 3rd is when I filed it.
	It was a Sunday night, like 1145.
	And what this writ of mandamus, so mandamus, I'm sure you noticed, but for your audience, mandamus in Latin means we command.
	And so what I'm doing here is I'm calling on the Supreme Court of the state of Florida to command the governor and attorney general to do their jobs.
	In Florida, in our state constitution, it's written into our constitution that the Supreme Court has jurisdiction over mandamuses when you're dealing with state officers performing their duty.
	And in our Constitution, it says the governor shall uphold the laws.
	So it shall is an imperative command.
	And the Attorney General is our highest legal officer in the Constitution.
	So they're both required to do what I'm asking them to do.
	And in this writ of mandamus, you know, I contacted Karen Kingston, and I asked her, I mean, she put it out publicly, but I asked her if I could use her research, and that makes up the facts of the, there's different sections, but the facts of the case part of this mandamus, like her research is there, and there's a lot of evidence we put there.
	I mean, I added some studies in there and did some light editing and added in the law.
	So what we do in this mandamus is I cite State and federal biological weapons laws are being violated.
	State and federal domestic terrorism laws are being violated.
	State and federal treason laws are being violated, as well as the federal genocide law.
	And I also do put in there the accessory, well, the state murder law too, but also the accessory after the fact law.
	Because if you're in Florida, our state law says, if you shield someone from prosecution, or if you allow a crime to continue, you become an accessory after the fact.
	And so I do kind of throw the kitchen sink at them.
	And then I also put in there, it's our prescription drug and cosmetic law here.
	And that deals specifically with an adulterated product.
	Good. And so because of that fact alone, these are an adulterated product.
	These should be taken off the market.
	And so I do put that in there as well.
	So I hit them with the kitchen sink, but then I pull back and say, look, we're not asking for indictments.
	We're not asking for anything. We're demanding as you take these off the market and enforce the law.
	And the body of evidence there, and I do include...
	Dr. Francis Boyle, the Harvard-educated law professor who wrote the 1989 Bioweapons and Anti-Terrorism Act, written international treaties on bioweapons, he endorsed the JAB resolution early on.
	I include an email from him that's in that document where he publicly endorses and says it's an offensive biological warfare weapon.
	So he is arguably, if not the world's, he's one of the world's leading legal experts on biological weapons.
	So I included that in there.
	And the body of evidence is really strong that's in this document.
	So, here's what can happen right now.
	The Supreme Court can, they've got great latitude here.
	They can reject it.
	They can, probably what I think they would do, based on the evidence we put in front of them, is just wait and allow the respondents, the governor and attorney general, to reply.
	And then I'll have time to reply, and then they'll render a decision.
	Or they could even remander another court to determine if acts of the case if they wanted to, which would be like winning a lottery, because then we're getting depositions and stuff.
	There's one fact that is established here.
	The state of Florida, through the Florida Department of Health, has said this is an adulterated product.
	That alone means they should be taken off the market.
	And I'm going to keep hammering that point.
	And so what I've been, part of my strategy here is to publicly put as much pressure on Governor DeSantis to tilt him in the right direction, to do what the Surgeon General of the State of Florida is saying, and take these weapons off the market.
	And that's part of what this is about.
	So I do ask people to go on my Substack, josephsansson.substack.com, and I have this article pinned on the top.
	And if you click on the link of the case number there, Take this document and share it far and wide because there's so much evidence here that we want to put...
	This is in the record now.
	This evidence is in the Supreme Court, so it is on the record.
	We want this evidence all over the place and trying to put as much pressure...
	Because Governor DeSantis, he's got a very simple choice right now.
	We're giving him a simple choice.
	He can have his attorneys fight against this and expose himself as a total and complete fraud...
	Or he can take these injections off the market, as the Florida Department of Health has said, and that's a simple choice.
	And he's got an opportunity to do the right thing here.
	Now, I don't have an axe to grind against Governor DeSantis, but I'm going to tell you, early on in the pandemic, he was out there telling people that 90% of the people in the hospital were the unvaccinated.
	I don't know if he knew he was lying.
	I knew he was lying, but I don't know if he knew.
	He might have been repeating what he was told.
	Right. But at this point, he's got no plausible deniability, and he needs to act, and he needs to act immediately.
	Like, I was at an event this past Friday where, in the villages, Dr.
	Vila is treated, which is, people don't know, it's the largest senior living community in the country, in Florida.
	Mm-hmm. Dr.
	Vila's treating like 3,500 quote-unquote vaccine-injured patients there.
	She's treating so many because a lot of the other doctors in the area won't treat these people.
	They're pretending. They're telling them it's in their head.
	They're telling them their pre-existing conditions.
	They're gaslighting. And, you know, you're literally speaking to people in the audience that are dying.
	It's pretty hard not to get emotional.
	And, you know, these people have been left out.
	They've been just kicked to the curb.
	So 17 million Floridians have been poisoned with at least one shot.
	And a lot of people, and let me just say this and I'll show up, a lot of people, like right now, might be thinking, well, it's too late.
	Everybody's been injected. Well, I've been working on it a long time.
	But the thing is this.
	These people, according to Dr.
	Vila, who's treating thousands of patients, and even Dr.
	Ben Marble, who's a Nobel Prize nominee, is treating thousands of patients.
	He affirmed that when I asked him about it.
	Everybody that gets the injection appears to be getting a compromised immune system.
	They're developing autoimmune disease, VADES, for lack of a better word.
	They might not know it right now, but each time you give people these shots and they're boosting them, and as they're shedding this nanotech on them and the hydrogels and all that stuff that gets in their blood, The people that have already been injected are the most susceptible to get sick.
	So those people do need to be protected, as well as my colleague, Dr.
	She's really one of the world's leading researcher on the hydrogels and everything.
	She uses darkfield microscopy.
	I don't know if you're familiar with her work, but she's showing the self-assembling technology in the blood creating the hydrogel mounds that end up becoming these biosynthetic blood clots that you see about.
	And she's even demonstrated in the blood of a cadaver that's eight months old that this self-assembly is still occurring.
	And so, yeah, so we need to protect these people.
	Look, here's the bottom line, David.
	If this path gets blocked, we'll find another path because this is going to end.
	We're not going to allow our people to be murdered anymore.
	We're not going to allow genocide to continue.
	And it's just not going to happen.
	I'm not going to let this continue.
	I'm going to tell you, just on the personal side, last April, I went into the hospital with congestive heart failure.
	I had triple bypass heart surgery.
	And even while I was there, I got Dr.
	Francis Boyle to endorse the resolution and things like that.
	I was actually working on this while I was there.
	I figured it'd be a good parting shot because what's the difference?
	You're going to die anyway. So my message to people watching and listening right now is...
	You're going to die. Get over it.
	Are you going to grob on your knees like a coward?
	Or are you going to stand up like a man or woman and fight?
	You need to get involved.
	You need to do whatever you can to change the direction right now because there are no white hats.
	Nobody is going to rescue you.
	I assure you, if I'm taking this action, if I'm doing this, there's nobody out there that's going to rescue you.
	You need to get up, get involved, and do it yourself.
	That's right. Absolutely. And people need to pay attention to the process that you did.
	As you point out, you got on your Substack, Joseph Sansone, S-A-N-S-O-N-E. People go to your Substack.
	They can find all these documents.
	They can take these documents and file them in their state.
	We need to have this done 50 times.
	Yeah. It's public record.
	There's so much information there.
	There is. And so this needs to go out there.
	And as you point out, there's nobody else who's going to do this.
	And that's the thing that, to me, bothers me so much.
	The fact that you've got people in the medical community and, of course, the politicians, and they're all covering for each other.
	They don't want to talk about this.
	Occasionally, you'll find a doctor, as you mentioned, who will take the risk to try to treat people.
	And we've seen... I've seen this from the very beginning.
	You know, people say, well, I give you ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine, and they try to, you know, take their medical license.
	But I talked to an orthopedic surgeon who was injured.
	You know, he's just a very successful surgeon.
	He can't work anymore because he's got tremors.
	And he said he started going to all these different doctors, and he said they all knew.
	And they would look at it and he would tell them, you know, this happened after I got vaccinated.
	It's like, well, I can't help you.
	I can't. Got to get you out. You know, it's this type.
	They're so afraid.
	Finally, he got one doctor and he said, I'll help you, but we're not going to talk about what caused this.
	And if you start talking about this, I'm not going to help you anymore.
	They are so afraid of all of this stuff.
	And that's the thing that is so corrupting.
	And I think the good news, Dr.
	Sansone, is that I think these people are cowards.
	And I think once they sense that the winds are shifting, they're going to go to the other side because they're not, you know, out of self-preservation.
	We've just got to build that momentum at the grassroots level and get it up because these people are cowards and they will shift at that point.
	But talk to me a little bit about, you know, as we've said, Latipo, who is the Surgeon General there in Florida, has said, because this is an adulterated product, we need to stop it right now.
	So, first of all, did he do that before or after you filed this thing?
	He did that on January 3rd.
	It's after the 10 counties passed the resolution.
	I know he was aware of that, and I know the governor was aware of that, too.
	But no, I filed this on March 3rd.
	He did that on January 3rd.
	Okay, all right. Now, let me ask you this.
	He filed that, and he got a lot of pushback from all the establishment, political, media, and all the rest of this pharmaceutical.
	Has there been any response at all from DeSantis about any of this stuff, or has he just been crickets on this?
	About what I'm doing?
	No, just about the adulterated aspect of what his own Surgeon General is doing.
	They did a sit-down kind of press conference together afterward.
	Here's what my assessment of it is.
	I think that Surgeon General Adipo is trying to save lives.
	And I think that Governor DeSantis is maybe playing a little politics and he's thinking he can...
	I think he's thinking he can appease people and then blame it on the federal government like they can't do anything about it.
	But look, the state of Florida has taken FDA products off the market before because they didn't believe the federal government.
	And, you know, Karen's found case law on that.
	So, you know, if that's their argument, we're going to...
	You know, the worst thing that can happen here is that the court just says no.
	honest to reply and us to reply to them, they're not gonna win this argument.
	I know they got all these high paid lawyers and everything, but we're right.
	Yeah.
	We're right.
	So I believe surgeons are in a lot of posts trying to save the lives of human beings.
	I mean, he said it's a threat to the human genome.
	I believe the governor thinks he can just pawn it off on the federal government, but no, here's the deal.
	If the governor can lock innocent human beings in their homes, violating the constitution of the state of Florida and the United States, the governor sure as hell can take a product off the market that is killing people.
	This is a biological and technological weapon.
	You know this is about depopulation.
	I know it's about depopulation and people watching.
	The governor knows what it's about.
	Now, Look, okay, let's give him the benefit of the doubt to a degree.
	Maybe he didn't see as much evidence as we just presented to him.
	Now he's seen it.
	Now the question is, is he going to be a total and complete fraud and fight against us?
	Or be on the wrong side of history?
	Or is he willing to take the opportunity that we just threw in front of him, which is to change the course of human history?
	Because if we take these off the market in Florida, Texas will have to follow suit.
	And I'm going to tell you right now, Texans can do the same thing that I just did.
	Because we have a unique situation.
	Our Florida Department of Health is saying they should come off the market.
	Well, guess what? The Attorney General in the state of Texas assumed Pfizer because they lied.
	Yeah. People got harmed.
	There's no reason that product should still be on the market.
	They could probably use the data we got, plus Attorney General Paxton's lawsuit and the information in there.
	I mean, I use that as evidence, too, and use that to...
	Forced the governor and attorney general of the state of Texas to take these weapons off the market.
	Oh, absolutely right. You're talking about the state's power.
	Can I say one thing, David? Yeah.
	One thing? Go ahead.
	I'm a pro se litigate.
	Mm-hmm. Okay.
	What's happening here, too, like you mentioned, the doctors, and I agree, all our politicians and people, they're all cowards, corrupt, they're out of touch, but what I think's happening here is these big law firms, these corporate law firms, all coerce their employees to get the shots.
	Yeah. Yeah. They're not going to touch it.
	The other attorneys are afraid of the bar.
	Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Yeah, it's the type of thing when you have somebody who wants to argue jury notification.
	Lawyers won't touch that. So if you want to do jury notification, you've got to do it pro se.
	And there have been people who have been successful with that.
	Well, and you have to be careful, Bill, because the judge will say you're...
	Oh, it froze up.
	The judge will say what?
	It froze up here right at that moment.
	Oh, I'm sorry. I think the judge, you've got to be careful because then the judge might say you're in contempt of court, you know, if you do that.
	So the judges very often don't let people know their rights.
	Yeah. Well, just real briefly, I'll give you the example of one guy who was a marijuana advocate, and he had decided that he was going to go for jury nullification.
	So he had in the New Jersey Constitution...
	It talked about how the jurors were there to judge the law as well as the facts of the case.
	He had that printed up, and he stuck it up on his desk, and the judge said, you take that down right now, or I'm going to throw you in jail for contempt.
	They took it down, but the jury already saw it, so they voted to acquit him 7-5.
	And then the prosecutor came after him again.
	Next time he got a judge that let him keep it up, and he won acquittal 12-0.
	So, you know, you take your chances on that kind of stuff.
	But again, it's another one of these deals.
	You're in a situation that is very much like you're against all the establishment.
	They're all worried about fraud that is there.
	And so they're all covering for each other.
	They're not just cowards.
	But when you said that the state has the power to take off a defective product, you're absolutely right.
	I've talked about this how in the past you had, I think it was seven people going back to 1970, some flu shot that they had.
	Seven people had died from the vaccine and you had nine states ban it.
	And not a single state has done this this time.
	And as you point out, Florida is the one that is the closest to doing that because the Surgeon General has said this is an adulterated product.
	It's a genetic modification.
	We've got to stop this.
	It's dangerous. But even with it just being adulterated, that's enough of a disqualification.
	That, you know, you don't have to start pointing fingers at people, and they don't have to worry that they're going to go to jail for murdering people, which they did.
	But, you know, it gives them an out that is a little bit less threatening.
	So I think it's very important to do that.
	And certainly the states could do that.
	They would do that. I've mentioned many times.
	Look at what they're doing with Boeing, or look at what they do with a crib that's defective, right?
	You take the crib off of the market.
	There's no doubt about that.
	And the federal government won't do it.
	The state can do it. Well, and I do want to say I do put in there all MRA products.
	I do say all products because we know they're putting in other medications and other food and that kind of thing.
	But I think that the states certainly have the power to do it.
	And attorneys are afraid of the bar, because I know somebody here, and a friend of mine in Florida ran for state attorney, and they're trying to suspend his license for political speech during a political campaign in a Republican primary for state attorney.
	So, yeah. Attorneys are afraid of the bar.
	And I've heard of other states where they've taken away licenses for people going after, you know, the stuff that I'm doing right now.
	So, yeah, maybe you can find attorneys to help you behind the scenes and you can take the action.
	Or if you're an organization, you can do it maybe.
	But... The states totally have the powers.
	They can violate the Constitution, lock innocent people in their homes, violating every law in the books, which they didn't have the authority to do.
	They can protect the public from weapons of mass destruction.
	I mean, I think what we're running into is, you know, each level of our government is captured.
	The question is, to what degree?
	You know, because, you know, we've got these fake computer elections, so we don't even know if our elections are totally fake.
	That's where we're at today.
	That's right.
	But the bottom line is, these are going to come off the market.
	They have to come off the market one way or the other, because this is not a threat.
	This is just the reality.
	If they don't come off the market, our government will collapse.
	Every government will eventually collapse, because governments cannot murder their citizens and exist.
	That's right. And what's going to happen is they're going to come along with the next one, try to force it on you, do the whole thing, scare everybody with the next thing, and keep pushing it out.
	And again... I mean, like I said, my colleague, Dr.
	Anna Mahalchuk, she specializes in, she's in Washington State, but she specializes in injuries for the unvaccinated from the shedding.
	So unvaccinated people are getting injured from the shedding, but what I'm telling you is the people who've gotten shots, if they've got compromised immune systems, they're obviously going to be more susceptible.
	Now, Everybody that's listening to us right now knows somebody that has died or is dying from these shots.
	If they don't, they just haven't connected the dots to the leukemia, the cancer, the strokes, the heart attacks, the autoimmune diseases, and so on, and the neurological problems to the injections.
	So what they're doing is they're slowly killing us, and they're cashing in on a way, as they're doing this controlled demolition of our society, they're cashing in, and they're...
	They're making us weaker, sicker, they're making us dumber, because when we're talking about brain fog, we're talking about neurological issues there.
	They've hit us with a nanoparticle weapon that's basically making us dumber, myself included.
	I'm leaning toward the position that COVID itself was a synthetic pathogen, like a nanoparticle weapon, just like these shots.
	This is asymmetrical warfare, and I believe asymmetrical warfare requires asymmetrical resistance.
	I think we need to be creative, and we need to do anything we can to keep pushing the envelope.
	Now, some people are thinking, like, oh, why are you doing this in Florida?
	But no. This is the place to do it.
	This is the place to push the envelope, because I'm telling you, we've got an opportunity here where we can tip DeSantis in the right direction, and he takes these off the market, and that will have a domino effect.
	This will be the real domino theory.
	That will actually ripple through society.
	I mean, he's got an opportunity right now to change the course of human history.
	I agree. And I think he's smart enough to understand that.
	Just like at the beginning, you know, he was very bad in terms of stopping people from coming on I-10 from the west or whatever, from I-95 north, coming into the state.
	But he pulled back pretty quickly along with the Georgia governor.
	Because they could kind of read the handwriting on the wall.
	They knew that this was fraudulent, and they wanted to get out in front of it.
	This is an opportunity for him to get out in front of it.
	And, you know, I think also when you look at what is happening with the border disputes, for example, and again, you look at Florida, and you look at Texas, and we just had the Supreme Court decision saying, okay, well, you can enforce your new Texas border law and arrest illegal migrants there because you have the authority to protect your residents.
	And it's that same type of thing.
	You know, again, in Florida, they're going to have a situation with Haitian immigrants, probably.
	The feds aren't going to do anything about the border.
	So is DeSantis going to say, well, I'm going to take the lead because I can protect the citizens here?
	That's the smart political move to make.
	Certainly it's the right thing to do, but it is a smart political move to get out in front of this massive democide that is happening and to get out in front and say, I'm going to protect the citizens, even if the federal government is not going to do it.
	They can do it on the border.
	They can do it on these shots as well.
	Well, you're right. It's a democide, but I do use the word genocide because we got genocide on there.
	Yeah. That's why I use that word.
	But, so, two things.
	One on the border and one on, I'll start with the bubbling up with DeSantis.
	I believe what happened in Florida, because I've been here since 2004, but I'm originally from Jersey.
	My Republican friends in Jersey, half of them are afraid of guns.
	Down here in Florida, most of my Democrat friends carry.
	Mm-hmm. So what was happening is it was bubbling up underneath DeSantis because, you know, we had our four-month shutdown, but a lot of the counties and cities and even some of the companies were being real oppressive trying to make people wear masks and everything.
	And what happened is a few places like on the East Coast down here in Florida, they had, like, people hold guns out on the employees at Walmart and places like that because they were trying to force them to wear a mask, that type of thing.
	And, like, I remember the one guy was, like, taking his dad on the wheelchair through the rain and he had his mask off because it was, like, Soak him wet.
	And he pulled the gun on the guy when they were harassing him.
	And so because of things like that, they pulled him back on it.
	So really, in a sense, our Second Amendment rights here in Florida are what I think pushed it back, like the tide.
	And that started the process because they saw it bubbling up.
	And then you're right, he got in front of it.
	On the immigration thing, first of all, states...
	These governors are all cowards, corrupt, and out of touch because they can nullify.
	I look, and I think it was March 19th, April 59, 1859, the state of Wisconsin nullified the Supreme Court decision and refused to return fugitive slaves.
	States have the ability to nullify federal laws that they're unconstitutional.
	In fact, they've got an obligation to it.
	But there is a simple thing that I think states can do, is simply pass laws.
	These so-called states that are red states that are against illegal immigration, there's a real simple solution.
	All they need to do is pass laws making it a felony for illegal aliens to be in their state.
	There's so many tools that are there that they can use.
	That's why I say, you know, as you point out, Florida's the place to be, because already, for whatever reason, if he's afraid of the rising populace or if he just wants to get out in front of this for political credit, he's already told certain jurisdictions, I'm gonna withhold money if you force this conduct or that conduct or the jabs or the masks on people.
	So he's already realized that that's a smart political position to be in, and that's the key thing.
	If you can get more and more people to talk about this, and if they see a grassroots swell, I've mentioned many times, Joseph, that when I was in North Carolina, run by Democrats all through the place, and they thought, the teachers union thought they had an opportunity to shut down homeschooling.
	And yet the homeschoolers organized and wrote this massive letter campaign.
	And that turned it off.
	Even in a Democrat state, even with a powerful teachers' union, a letter-writing campaign stopped it.
	That can work if you get enough of a response.
	And so if people... We'll do that.
	These guys who maybe they don't have any principles at all, but maybe they just want to please the crowd and get out in front of the crowd, they might do it for those reasons.
	Well, here's the deal.
	I mean, if we start waking up the army of the injured, and these people were angry.
	These people were sick, but they were angry.
	But if we start having these people that are sick showing up on the governor's doorstep, I don't think he's going to like the optics of that either.
	Now, I can tell you this.
	The governor here was...
	He was...
	the governor and the attorney general were served two days ago. So they've been served this 74 page document here and would have loved to seen their their faces you know when I saw that but they have been served and so we'll see he's got an opportunity to do the right thing.
	It's just we can't allow more people need to step up though and we need to put as much of a a spotlight on Governor DeSantis is possible.
	I agree with you, you know, if they see an army of the injured, an army of the grieved people who have lost relatives, and that's the other thing that's strange about this, because I've been covering this from, you know, late December and early, late December 2020 and early January 2021, when you had a massive number of people dying.
	That was always a thing that was difficult to make the connections with these vaccines, because the killing was always a slow situation.
	You know, even in the Scandinavia, where they had a very clear case for pandemics that Fauci and Mansef Slaoui had run through before, that took about a year for it to show up in children.
	And so there's this, and they got it banned, but, you know, they can always play this game Well, it's not us, it's something else.
	But when people go in and they get a shot and they immediately die within 24, 48 hours, that was unprecedented in terms of the immediate harm.
	And then now we've got, you know, the people still dying suddenly, but we've got the longer term...
	Injuries that are out there to the immune system, to the turbo cancer, and the rest of the stuff.
	But it is important for people to get together, and the key thing that they have done is the control of information, to make people feel like they're the only ones.
	They're isolated. Well, this happened to me, and I'm absolutely certain that happened with the vaccine, but I guess I'm just the only one.
	They're not the only one. There's tens of millions of people globally this has happened to.
	They need to start getting people organized, and that really comes down to us being able to pass information around.
	If we can pass that information around, we can get an army of the injured, we can get an army of the bereaved to push this pressure on people.
	They need to know that they're not the only ones, and they need to get together and use that anger, that grief, to try to press for change, and even to get to the medical community acknowledging this so that there can be some move towards trying to ameliorate some of this injury that people have had.
	because you can't even get any, you can't even talk about the treatment unless we push back on this.
	Well, we have to push back. I mean, this goes back to Solomon Anst's studies on conformity, you know, where he had the people looking at the line, three lines over here, and then there's one line over here. It was like obvious which one matched, but they had a bunch of Confederates saying the wrong answer. And over, it was like 38% of the time, the participants stated the the wrong answer because of the pressure.
	But when they did it with one other person that said the truth, the right line that matched, 95% of the time the person said the right answer.
	So simply by telling the truth, you are liberating people.
	It might take them 3, 6, or 9 months before it actually clicks in.
	But you have to keep, you know, we've got a powerful weapon here.
	It's the truth. Censorship is working.
	They've got this TikTok bill that they passed through the House, which I guess is going to the Senate.
	That's bogus.
	That is about taking away, that's about giving the president absolute power to censor us and decide what websites and apps we can see.
	Hopefully the Senate doesn't prove that.
	But I mean, I guess if it gets passed, I would imagine the Supreme Court would rule that unconstitutional if it got challenged.
	I'd hope, but you don't know who they have blackmail on or who they have, you know, it's the world we're living in.
	Oh yeah, they can ban TikTok.
	What's next? Substack?
	Rumble? Anything? Any website?
	Republicans think it's a bright idea to give Joe Biden the power to decide what apps can go on your phone and what websites can go on your PC. That's right.
	That's real bright. Yeah, that's a good way to put it.
	Yeah, I call BS on all that.
	You know, if they're really concerned about communism, they wouldn't have shut everything down, locked everything down like a bunch of, you know, psychopathic guitaritarians.
	So, yeah, the bottom line is we have to fight, we have to tell the truth, and we have to be creative, we have to be on the offensive.
	You know, it's an Italian thing.
	It goes back to the Romans. I made sure I timed this with March, because we've got to go to war in March.
	Yeah. So, we're on the offensive.
	We're going to keep doing it, and I think more people need to do similar.
	What I ask people to do is to duplicate, do similar type of actions, catch them with it.
	I'm going to tell you right now, nobody in the state of Florida contemplated this before I did it.
	Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. They didn't see this coming.
	And how they react, look, if Governor DeSantis fights against this, in the future, he's not going to be able to show his face in public.
	Yeah. Because these people are going to continue to get sick and die, and eventually the dots are going to be connected.
	You're going to have a lot of angry, sick people.
	Yes. And then the other side of this is, what do we do with these people that are sick right now?
	Nobody's even treating them, let alone helping them.
	Yes. I agree.
	You know, just from political pragmatism, he's got to understand that.
	And maybe that'll motivate him to do more things.
	Unless it's all fake. Unless it's all fake, David.
	If the machine voting is just all fake, then maybe they don't.
	But that's only going to last so long before it hits the fan, though.
	That's true. Well, let's talk about what is happening up in New Jersey, the North American Renaissance movement.
	Tell me a little bit about that. Oh, sure.
	NationalArm.org.
	That's an organization started by David Meiswinkle.
	He's an attorney.
	He's one of the attorneys that had put eyes on this before I submitted it.
	The other three are anonymous.
	But he, I believe, was the president of the Lawyers for 9-11 Committee, I think was the name of it or something.
	Yeah. Which plays into my theory about why people didn't get conned, which we can talk about.
	I talk about that a lot.
	This stuff goes back.
	I always say this is the other shoe to drop from 9-11 because they had dark winter two months before 9-11.
	Then they had the anthrax attack one week later, and then they pushed out this model legislation for the governors to do all this stuff when a president would come along and give them an executive order and the money.
	That's what they did. They activated this stuff.
	And so now you've got some Republican areas like South Carolina where they're trying to claw back some of these state laws that give the governors or the public health people these kind of powers that they gave them back in December of 2001.
	Yeah, so definitely they're tied together.
	I think it's called Lawyers Committee for 9-11 Truth, I think.
	Yeah, something like that.
	So we had a big conversation about this the other night after that event with the victims.
	Like, we were talking at the dinner, and they're asking me, because I'm a psychotherapist, I'm like, well, you know, we started a conversation.
	Why did some people get, you know...
	Hook, line, and sink, or take this, and other people, like, knew right away or woke up early enough in it.
	And I, you know, because as a psychotherapist, I specialize in clinical hypnosis, so I'm like, some of it's just a groupthink and a massive hypnosis, because I try to explain to people, it's the opposite of what people think.
	So the smarter you are, the better of a hypnotic subject you are.
	Like, I get Mensa people come to me, they drop like flies.
	Now... If your IQ... I mean, you have to be willing to do it, but I mean, you have to be a willing participant, but if it's the people with, like, an IQ of, like, 70 or below, we're talking far above level intelligence, they can't be able to test because they can't focus and follow instruction, you know?
	So that's why we saw a lot of really smart people that are brainwashed.
	So I came up with that it has to do with your prior experience.
	Like, so... I'm an old Buchanan guy from the 90s.
	I've been awake since 1991, December 10th, 1991, when he challenged the first Bush and called out the first person to call out the New World Order publicly.
	So when 9-11 hit, I was aware of what was going on then.
	And so when this was happening in late 2019, I was like, well, this is just 9-11, except they want to make the whole country in the world the airport.
	So I didn't even know all the details.
	I knew what was happening, though.
	Right. And so, that I think is part of it, because other people are saying, like, if you have a faith in God, which I think might be part of it too, because some people, I think, know what they're doing, they know what's going on, but they don't want to admit it, and it's too ugly to look at, so they're going along with the lie.
	And I think if you're a little more authentic, you can't do that.
	And so that's part of it too.
	But I'm going to tell you, deep down, I think it's the Reformed juvenile delinquents that are going to save the world, because the honor roll students...
	The honor roll students need the approval.
	We don't. Well, you know, I remember when all this stuff was happening, and I said that as well.
	I said, this is a psychological war from the very beginning.
	And even that summer, we had a Yale study.
	It was published on the NIH site.
	And it said, okay, so here's the different ways that you can lie to people.
	They actually did a real test, unlike, you know, the vaccine, where they should have done a controlled experiment, you know, and have a control group and another group.
	They actually did that with a psychological thing.
	They just didn't tell us there's... We're going to tell people that you're saving your neighbor, you know?
	You know, I was just going to say, they did do the controlled study on it.
	They just didn't tell us it was designed to kill us.
	That's right. Yeah, yeah.
	Sorry. Go ahead. Yeah, but they did a controlled study and published it, you know, for the different psychological lies that they could tell people.
	You know, put a guilt trip on somebody, tell them that it's a miracle of science, and all these different things.
	And so they had different people who would roll that out.
	But it is... Yeah, it truly is a psychological experiment, and I'm sure that you saw that from the very beginning as well.
	But it is important for us to break that spell and to break this corruption that is there.
	You mentioned the religious aspect of it.
	That's another thing about it.
	People who, as you said, authentic, if they've got an authentic belief in this, they're not going to go along with the crowd.
	But I saw, in terms of talking about education or even intelligence, but I would say just as much education.
	I remember when this was happening, and they talked about people who would go along with the masking and the social distancing, and it went up with education level.
	So the people who had a high school or less education level were down here, and then the next group, they would jump up, you know, the bachelor's degree, then a master's degree.
	And then when you got to the Ph.D., it suddenly dropped down again because they were a little bit less indoctrinated, you know?
	Some of them were trained to think outside the box to get their degree, perhaps.
	I don't know. Yeah, I mean, yeah, right, because you had to, you're right, it was like the PhD level, and then like the people without college were the smartest people.
	That's right. And the most critically thinking people, which was weird in a way, because, you know, you got to go through a lot of, I rejected it and argued with my professors all along the way, but you go through a lot of brainwashing, go through the whole educational process, because it's all BS today, but you needed to get a license, you know? Yeah, that was interesting.
	Like, I joke around with my clients, you know, because I'm like, you know, I only use my Jedi mind tricks for good.
	I never have you follow little lines.
	I never have you follow little lines on the floor or anything like that, you know?
	It's just the world we're living in today.
	I'm the only therapist that tells them it's the end of the world, don't worry about it.
	But on the religious thing...
	Living in the South is a little different than living up North.
	People do tend to wear their religion on their sleeves, you know?
	But there's just something in the Bible there.
	I remember reading something about you judge the tree by the fruit or something like that.
	Something along those lines.
	I gotta tell you, these people wrapping themselves around their religions but being silent right now, they are totally denying Christ.
	Oh, yeah. I call every one of these pastors and priests out and people that consider themselves to be Christian or even other religions.
	They're not living up to their beliefs either, but you are denying Christ if you're looking the other way right now.
	Absolutely. And it's been that way from the very beginning.
	A lot of people were trying to do the right thing. They believed it. They didn't know the experience like you've seen, the experience like I have seen, you know. But then it was pretty clear several months into it and people were still going along with it. And from the beginning you did have some pastors who had that discernment and they never shut their churches down.
	They always kept them open. A small town I've talked about many times even in Illinois where you We had a very bad Democrat governor, Pritzker, up there.
	He said, yeah, we never shut down.
	The sheriff is a member of the church, and he's going to protect us from the state police if they come here.
	So I said, this is what you do.
	You always have to have this community together.
	You're not going to be able to stand against this stuff necessarily on your own, but if somebody's got a real authentic belief, they will stand, even on their own if they have to.
	So that's the key thing, I think.
	Yeah, because, I mean, Jesus didn't put on the CDC bubble suit and mask to go heal the lepers, you know.
	You've got to have a little faith there, you know.
	I remember when we watched Ben-Hur with the kids when they were very young, you know, and this whole thing about the leprosy, and you're really creeped out about it.
	And at one point, he goes over and he touches the leper, and my son jumped.
	He's like, no! It's like a horror film, because they didn't watch horror films, you know?
	It's good. But that's the way people were treated.
	Everybody as if they were lepers, you know?
	It was absolutely crazy, especially the psychological aspect of it, the other.
	You know, everybody is unclean.
	Don't touch anybody. If you're in a crowd and you sneeze or something, everybody looks at you like...
	Oh, this is death warmed over.
	I mean, it was amazing the psychological, you know, how they were able to change people's minds.
	To break you down. Yeah. Yeah, it was to break you down, to isolate you, to make you feel marginalized.
	I've got to be afraid of you and stand six feet away.
	In fact, now you still see, look, I think it's like, you know, what is it, three feet in the United States, like 18 inches in Europe, like what was normal for people to stand apart in public.
	So it was a little closer in Europe, but You still see people, like, in lines in the stores, afraid to stand, like, too close or, you know, with a normal three-foot distance.
	Yeah. And it's baffling.
	Yeah, and you see all these things happening worldwide, and, you know, they're all about the same thing.
	And, you know, how do we come up with this distance, you know, and everybody's doing the same distance here, and it's all just made up?
	It's made up, and they're implementing it globally.
	It's crazy. I simplify things, David.
	I look at it like this, and I'm like, well, let me see.
	Russia and the United States, Israel and Iran all came up with the same dumb scientific idea on how to deal with this.
	I don't know. Maybe something's wrong here.
	It's a leap. I know I'm out on a limb.
	But, you know, we're going to start a nuclear war, but we came up with the same game plan on how to deal with this.
	Yeah, good idea. That's right.
	And they did it at exactly the same time.
	They weren't copying it. They all did it at exactly the same time.
	The other thing I loved about it was as they would implement one of these steps and say, and in two months, this is the next thing we're going to do.
	And it didn't matter who it was.
	They were all going to do it. The next step is in two months.
	And here's why it's like, well, if this is really an emergency, why aren't you doing everything right now?
	It's just so obvious, isn't it?
	But the important thing is what you're doing there and people who are getting together in other states and the template that you put there on Substack is an opportunity for people to take this, do it yourself.
	Do it in your state.
	If we can get this in a lot of different places and understand that you're not alone, start to connect with other people and get this message out there because it's still the isolation.
	It's the isolation of information that they're putting on us right now instead of the physical isolation.
	But they're still running this isolation game on us.
	And if we can connect to other people and we can get this word out, that's why I wanted to talk to you today.
	Very important what you're doing.
	I really do appreciate that.
	Well, I appreciate the opportunity and it's important for people to not sit on the sidelines.
	So let's put it this way.
	This is about the survival of our species.
	Yeah, that's right. If you're sitting on the sidelines right now, you're already like a victim of a zombie apocalypse or whatever you want to call it because you're alive right now.
	Apparently we've all signed up for the early 21st century dystopian nightmare reality.
	So I'm going to say right now, if you're alive right now and you're within the sound of my voice, you're here to do your part to stop the extinction of the human race.
	That's right. And your own extinction.
	And the extinction of your children and your grandchildren and all the rest of the stuff.
	You know, make it personally, but it comes all the way back to you.
	You know, they're going to come for you.
	You're not going to get away from this.
	You know, even if you don't care about future generations, they're going to come for you as well.
	And it's going to happen very, very quickly.
	And all the stuff that they did, still in place, unless we do the kinds of actions that you're doing.
	So I really do appreciate it.
	Dr. Joseph Sansone, and people can find him on Substack.
	Get that and take a look at it.
	Talk to other people about it.
	Maybe you'll want to file this on your own in your own state.
	So thank you so much for what you're doing.
	Great talking to you. And keep us informed, okay?
	So what's going on? Thank you, sir.
	You're the best. Thank you. All right.
	We're going to take a quick break, folks, and we will be right back.
	Stay with us. Using free speech to free minds.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	Elvis. Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles.
	And the sweet sounds of Motown.
	Find them on the Oldies channel at APSradio.com.
	That's right. Take that mask off and smile.
	And don't let them put it back on you or anybody else, as a matter of fact.
	And the time that we've got left, and I wanted to talk about this today, there's a Supreme Court ruling that I thought was very interesting.
	They ruled against the FBI in one of these no-fly list cases.
	Now, one of the first things that I covered as a reporter at InfoWars was a story that was brought to us by Doug Hagman in October of 2012.
	And I was really impressed with Doug Hagman.
	He said, well, look, the guy came to me.
	I've got the scoop on this story.
	I've reported on it. But I want to get this out to as many people as I can because I want to stop this and I want to help this guy.
	And I thought that was an honest, really straightforward way to do this.
	I really respect what Doug did.
	It was an individual who was put on a no-fly list.
	And he was going to visit his wife in Japan, and so she was in the military, and he had military flights, so we're going to take him there as a family member.
	And he himself had done work for the FAA, so he had FBI clearance, he had a carry license, all these other things.
	He had many different ways that he had been vetted.
	Uh, by TSA, he'd been vetted by the FBI and all the rest of this stuff.
	Plus, he's on a military plane to go visit his wife, who's in the military, and he goes from continental U.S. to Hawaii.
	He changes planes, still a military plane, and they're about to take off for the final leg to go from Hawaii to Japan.
	And just before the plane takes off, these agents come on board and remove him.
	I said, you're on a no-fly list.
	You can't go any further. Well, how did I get to this point without you noticing this?
	And why am I on the no-fly list?
	They refused to tell him.
	And so it was this kind of catch-22, and oh, by the way, if you're on a no-fly list and you're in Hawaii, how do you get out of there?
	What do you do? You catch a slow freighter out of there to try to get home?
	I mean, he was in a real problem, so he contacted Doug Hagman, and Doug Hagman contacted us, and eventually he got enough publicity that he got people who were in the military To put some pressure on people.
	They never would tell him why he was put on a no-fly list.
	A lot of people have been put on a no-fly list by mistake.
	He couldn't figure out if that was it or if there was something else that they had an issue with.
	They never gave him an answer, but he was able to get a hold of some people who were in the military.
	They kept passing this thing up until they got him on board a plane and got him back to the United States.
	But he still couldn't get an answer from them as to whether or not he had been removed from the no-fly list.
	This is all top secret.
	And you understand how heinous this is.
	The fact that the FBI or any other government agency can put you on a list and you have no right to see the charges against you. This is the kind of stuff that goes back to Magna Carta type of rights that we've had for a thousand years that we've been trying to establish this stuff. A right to a trial by jury, a right to be told what the charges are against you, a right to argue and to call witnesses on your behalf and to defend yourself against. All that's
	removed with this no-fly list stuff. We have these secret star chamber courts and the FBI is just fine with it.
	Obama's fine with it. Trump's fine with it.
	Biden is fine with it. None of them care about due process.
	That's one of the reasons why I don't care what's happening to Trump.
	But they don't care about this kind of due process, whether it's civil asset forfeiture and the drug war, or whether it's this no-fly list, presumably under the terror war or whatever.
	They really don't care whatsoever.
	And so this is a situation where the Supreme Court on Tuesday, yesterday, unanimously ruled against the FBI in deciding that a man's challenge to his former placement on the no-fly list may proceed.
	The FBI puts him on a secret list.
	The FBI says, no, you don't get a chance to look at this.
	And the Supreme Court says, of course he gets a chance to look at this.
	Justice Gorsuch, writing for the court, said the government has not demonstrated that his case is moot.
	They might be able to in the future.
	As the case unfolds, the complaints, allegations will be tested rather than taken as true.
	Different facts may emerge and may call for a different conclusion, he wrote.
	This, folks, is the ultimate, and I don't want to call this high-tech tyranny.
	Nothing changes in human nature.
	This is retro tyranny.
	This is retro tyranny going back to the dark ages, where you have secret trials.
	No right to know anything about this, let alone due process and presumption of innocence.
	No, you have no right to know what the charges against you are.
	We're just going to apply the punishment and not even tell you.
	It's just truly amazing to me.
	And it's why I look at this and it's like, yes, I understand what they're doing with Trump is political persecution.
	You have to ask yourself, Don't they understand this?
	Of course they do. What's their motivation in doing this?
	Well, they want to push him with his base.
	But beyond that, all the people who are so up in arms about the removal of due process when it comes to Donald Trump, they haven't cared for decades about the drug wars civil asset forfeiture.
	They don't care about the no-knock SWAT team raids.
	They don't care about the no-fly lists.
	They don't care about any of this stuff.
	And this is so foundational.
	But see, it's what applies to you and I. Not what applies to this guy that we all have to protect.
	On Rockfan Andromeda, thank you very much for the tip.
	He says, I appreciate all you do.
	Well, I appreciate what you do.
	Thank you. Without your support and without the support of all of you who have been so kind to support this program, we would not be doing this.
	Again, I'll just run down real quickly the people who have supported us.
	Make sure you go to davidknight.gold.
	I'll take you to Tony Ardman.
	And as we talked about this earlier, gold, silver, large or small, or do it on a regular basis and take advantage of the group buys that are there with Wolfpack.
	Gerald Salenti, as we were talking earlier about the commercial real estate, he said this was going to happen at the very beginning.
	As soon as the lockdowns were happening and people were no longer going to, not church, but to work, and what was going to happen to the banking industry as well.
	So if you want to get a leg up on what is happening at Trends Journal, just go there.
	You can subscribe, use the code name NIGHT, and you can save 10% off of the subscription for Trends Journal.
	I'll just end here with a joke from the Babylon Bee.
	This is another no-fly.
	The Boeing 737.
	New Boeing 737 toy features wings that really fall off.
	Wow, the wings really come off just like in real life, said a boy in a TV commercial for it.
	Crash, bang, we're all gonna die.
	When the plane parts began falling from the sky, said the Boeing CEO, I knew we were headed for a PR disaster.
	We may not be able to build good planes, but we can build cool toys, and that's just as good.
	So you get a Boeing toy that has the wings come off, the wheels come off.
	I know it is an apt metaphor for our society if we don't get back to the foundational things that have held us together, including these long-term standing protections.
	Thank you for joining us.
	Let me tell you, The David Knight Show, you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	Ha ha ha! And you want to know something else?

▲