Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 8, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:02:13

The David Knight Show - 03/08/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	I
	am using free speech to free minds.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13 on this the eighth day of March, Yerba Olor 2024.
	I'm Gardner Goldsmith filling in for David and I welcome you to the David Knight Show.
	Thanks for being here. Today we're going to be joined by three great guests to discuss big stories breaking in the news, and we're going to tear those stories apart and get great intellectual ammunition to take with us to fight for freedom and future generations.
	Don't forget, you can find the David Knight Show at Rumble at Rockfin, DLive, and of course, David Knight's Twitter slash X is at Libertitarian.
	And please visit the David Knight Show website.
	You can comment Inside X if you're watching there.
	You can also do so on Rumble and in Rockfin, and we'll visit with the chatters over there.
	They are a great group of people.
	thanks for joining us welcome one all Well, thank you very much for your kind thoughts.
	A few of you knew I was going to be filling in for David today.
	I did my little streaming show last night.
	It's called Liberty Conspiracy, and we do that every Monday through Friday at 6 p.m.
	And you can find that, of course, on Rockfin and Rumble.
	And you might know my work from MRCTV, the Media Research Center, Brent Bozell's group, which has been going for now 36 into its 37th year.
	And I want to acknowledge and thank all the fine folks at MRCTV for allowing me to do work for them, videos, writing on constitutional items, economic stories, and things like that.
	And I want to thank you for joining me.
	We're going to have a great day today.
	On tap today, we'll be visited by the great James Bovard.
	His latest book, Last Rights, just came out about a month and a half ago.
	We'll talk to James Bovard about the state of the onion address.
	And then shortly after that, we'll be joined by Toby Leary, co-owner of Cape Gunworks in Hyannis, Massachusetts, very close to the Kennedy compound, but we've got to be very careful.
	And he'll be talking to us a little bit about the bump stock arguments in the Supreme Court, as well as some big things that have been happening.
	And he's been fighting so hard in the Massachusetts legislature.
	In fact, it's in the Gardner Hall.
	I didn't even know there was one, but my name goes back to the family that was around Massachusetts way back in the old days.
	So it probably has some connection to my family.
	And I'm sorry about that, Toby.
	But he has fought so hard to try to stop the expansion of the government of Massachusetts and their attempts to throw darts at the Second Amendment.
	And we'll be joined by Gerald Salente in the 11 o'clock hour.
	Of course, Gerald Salente of Trends Journal.
	Always terrific to talk to Gerald and I always love it because I get to tap into that jazz vibe.
	So welcome one and all. Remember, you can always donate at Rockfin and Rumble and I welcome you to do so as we gather together and as I say on my program, we try to turn all their political frowns upside down.
	We try to put a smile on things while we derive long-lasting intellectual ammunition to defend freedom against those who would debase the currency that they force us to use and debase the very concept of rights.
	Once the concept of rights has been debased by the predators, all the rest follows.
	If they are unwilling to recognize your right to exist as a sovereign individual, only answerable to God and the natural rights that God gave you and other people, if they are willing to invade those natural rights, whether it's to force you to use a certain currency or it's to force you to show a certain type of ID or to get rid of a firearm that you could use to defend yourself, well, that debasement comes from the debasement of rights right
	So let's find out what's on tap today on the program, one and all.
	The David Knight Show for 3-8-24.
	Of course, we'll go into our newsflash, a little abbreviated one from what I kind of do on my show.
	It's the Biden State of the Political Onion edition.
	Yes! We'll also mention, if we get the opportunity...
	I might push that down a little bit as the U.S. secretly surprise Israel with arms and they want more weapons.
	And of course, wait till you see how Joe Biden started off his State of the Onion address last night.
	It was a very nasty, smelly onion.
	Should have been thrown away a long time, that concept of the polis, the state imposing itself on us.
	Just a gang of thieves and thugs.
	The Wall Street Journal confirmed yesterday that the Russian-Ukraine peace treaty was, I know, shocker!
	What? What are you talking about?
	Get out of here! Yes, it was hobbled by the Brits.
	Who would have thunk it that Forrest Johnson could have actually got something done, huh?
	Ah, geez. Yeah, pretty much everything he's done has been an absolute mess, and this was one of those things.
	And then we're going to be looking at Kathy Hochul breaching the Fourth Amendment in subways.
	I know, it's a true shocker.
	And... How that actually ties into things that people in some of the southern states like Arizona and New Mexico have been dealing with as they try to get to work with, of course, the immigrations and customs people pulling them over and making them engage in checks, stops, stop, you know, stop and show us your ID things that the American colonialists, they didn't exactly dig that and they lifted arms to oppose.
	Strange how times have changed, isn't it?
	Well, some people are opposing them and fighting for freedom.
	Thanks for doing so, everybody.
	Let's see what our first story is.
	It is, of course, the political state of the Union, or as the Kinks might have said, perhaps a state of confusion.
	It's a state of confusion.
	I always love the kinks and I gotta say I'd love for those two brothers to get playing together again but that's okay.
	They gave us some great music, and if you get a chance, I've mentioned to my audience, Ray Davies has a wonderful set of country songs, all admiring American freedom, actually.
	So check out Ray Davies.
	He is, of course, fantastic.
	And so, let's talk about the State of the Union.
	And what happened just before the State of the Union?
	First off, a couple of blush stories here.
	You might have heard about this just before Joe Biden arrived at the State of the Union.
	As we can see here from Clarence Williams, not Clarence Williams III, who wrote this for the Washington Post.
	Pro-Palestinian protesters blocked roads near the Capitol.
	Then a young teenager, 18-year-old man, started to rev his engine at them, and of course police got him out of the car and arrested him.
	And the Palestinians, no, they weren't calling for the end of the Jewish people.
	As so many of the deep state rhino people try to depict folks who are just asking for the United States to stop sending weapons to the Israeli government.
	How about that? How about just a ceasefire?
	That would be an interesting thing to see.
	Well, they also could stop sending weapons and money and a lot of other things like advice, telemetry, satellite information to things like, oh, Ukraine.
	Even as NATO expands.
	If you didn't get to see this one, anti-war noted that NATO has accepted Sweden.
	Sweden, which of course for decades was always...
	The non-combatant, it was always the in-between neutral force during the Cold War.
	Well, now they've joined NATO. Because, of course, NATO was formed to stop the expansion of the Soviet Union.
	And then once the Soviet Union ended, well, you know what happened.
	NATO kept expanding.
	Yes, of course. And the United States got involved in overthrowing NATO. We're good to go.
	And yes, there are photographs of John McCain and Joe Biden meeting with Ole Tianybach, who is an overt Nazi.
	And there are photographs of other people like, let's see, Joe Biden, Amy Klobuchar, Chris Murphy, the senator from Connecticut.
	And Lindsey Graham, all hanging out with that wonderful guy.
	Awesome stuff, right?
	Well, now Sweden has joined the expanding NATO, which I hate to say it, but many of the people back when I was a big Cold Warrior told me, you know, NATO's really looking pretty aggressive here as the Soviet Union winds down.
	Well, they were right. They were absolutely right.
	And so what do we see here?
	The final bit as we prepare to look at the State of the Union address is that Joe Biden got heckled right off the bat.
	It wasn't about the Palestinians.
	It wasn't about Gaza.
	It wasn't about Ukraine. It was about the pullout from Afghanistan.
	A man got up and said, remember Abbey Gate, U.S. Marines, a protester said, and there he is.
	And as they note here at USA Today, Abbey Gate is a reference to a 2021 suicide bombing during the evacuation of Afghanistan.
	The protester was handcuffed in that, you know, house of the people that he helped pay for, was handcuffed and arrested after being escorted out by security from the House gallery.
	I think the security was armed.
	I don't know. But, you know, to me, that's sort of a bit of gun violence there.
	And, you know, Joe Biden...
	Very keen on getting rid of guns, as he mentioned, in his State of the Union.
	Let's see how everything started off with the State of the Union address as we head into it right now and check things out.
	This is Joe Biden getting lots and lots of applause, and then things didn't exactly go his way, even though he was speaking very rapidly.
	What's the difference between a service animal and an emotion?
	They're giving us another one of these little things.
	There we go. Okay. Joe wasn't pleased, it looked like.
	Good evening.
	Good evening. If I were smart, I'd go home now.
	You remember, anybody remember how he talked about how he had a much higher IQ than somebody else when he was running for president?
	Well, he's much more humble now.
	Isn't that great?
	Now that he's president, you got it.
	Oh, what a guy. What a charmer, huh?
	Mr. Speaker!
	Madam Vice President, members of Congress, my fellow Americans, in January 1941, Franklin Roosevelt came to this chamber to speak to the nation, and he said, I address you at a moment unprecedented in the history of the Union.
	Hitler was on the march.
	War was raging in Europe.
	President Roosevelt's purpose was to wake up Congress and alert the American people.
	That this was no ordinary time.
	So immediately he opens, sort of equating these times to the post-Pearl Harbor era And, of course, anybody who's aware of what Roosevelt did to set up Pearl Harbor is already hearing alarm bells because he's trying to make a reference to Ukraine, as if the United States is in any danger because of Ukraine.
	But that's the way they're going to depict it.
	They're just carrying on the Russian meddling.
	Now it's Russian expansion.
	And if we don't watch it, Vladimir Putin will turn into a laser beam and cross the Atlantic Ocean.
	Freedom and democracy.
	We're under assault in the world.
	This coming from the guy, of course, who mandated jabs on people to go across borders if they wanted to engage in trucking and carried on the ridiculous emergency order from Donald Trump of March of 2020 that set all the dominoes in motion For many corporations to mandate jabs, state governors to engage in their emergency lockdowns, completely contrary to half of the Bill of Rights.
	But, you know, I don't swear an oath to the Constitution.
	It's just him. So let's continue.
	Give him a little more time, shall we?
	Tonight, I come to the same chamber to address the nation.
	Now, it's we who face unprecedented moment in the history of the Union.
	Notice how fast he's talking, too.
	That was weird. People are commenting on this.
	Like, what is in his system?
	Yes, my purpose tonight is to wake up the Congress and alert the American people that this is no ordinary moment either.
	Not since President Lincoln and the Civil War have freedom and democracy been under assault at home as they are today.
	What makes our moment rare is that freedom of democracy are under attack both at home and overseas.
	At the very same time.
	Now, I know what you're thinking.
	You're saying, wait a minute.
	When he's talking about freedom and democracy, wasn't the United States government involved with the overthrow of the elected leadership of Ukraine?
	And that would then lead to the installation of a new president that was chosen by people who associated with, as I mentioned, Chani Bach.
	When they got rid of We're good to go.
	And had nothing to do with Palestinians being pushed back over and over again since 1947.
	You know, that sort of thing.
	How about the fact that the United States ended up supporting Hamas and they're still not asking for extradition of the Hamas leaders from Qatar?
	You know, an ally of the United States.
	I don't know. Something sort of rings hollow to me.
	What do you think? Drop your comments and rock, Ben.
	Putin of Russia is on the march.
	Invading Ukraine and sowing chaos throughout Europe and beyond.
	If anybody in this room thinks Putin will stop at Ukraine, I assure you he will not.
	Thank you.
	She was not. Of course, she's an expert on international relations and paramilitary strategy and the history of Ukraine.
	She knows a lot about it.
	She obviously listened to the Tucker Carlson Vladimir Putin interview where he engaged in that very good, very detailed and very true history of Ukraine and Russia.
	She obviously knows all about it.
	And, well, you know, she's just very excited about freedom But Ukraine...
	Ukraine can stop...
	Ukraine can stop Putin if we stand with Ukraine and provide the weapons that needs to defend itself.
	That is all.
	That is all Ukraine is asking.
	They're not asking for American soldiers.
	So let's get this straight.
	The State of the Union address here in the United States, among all the many things, all the canards that Joe Biden is going to push.
	We'll talk with James Bovard about those things.
	Regarding the economy, the gun violence somehow being under his control to be able to bring down when he so-called bans something that people on the black market will get.
	And of course, by so-called banning it, he breaches our rights.
	He breaches the Second Amendment, all those things.
	Before he gets to any of that stuff, before he starts to pat himself on the back, you know, this man who's now so humble, who once said he had a much higher IQ than some guy who was in a crowd.
	This man, this wonderful man, he is taking the United States and equating the future of the United States with the future of Ukraine.
	That's great. That's awesome.
	I'm sure a lot of patriotic people who are still alive from World War II, and maybe they realize that Roosevelt was a slimeball as well.
	Maybe they're starting to see the similar patterns in honesty and the truthfulness of both of those men being highly questionable.
	The debasement of truth, you might say, as the state debases our rights.
	And, of course, debases the very concept of United States sovereignty.
	Everything's got to be tied to all these other nation states and, of course, the military-industrial complex, where, yes, Nikki Haley seems to have done very well after connecting with the military-industrial complex and running for her presidential campaign.
	And she can keep any of the leftover money that she didn't spend in her campaign.
	That's awesome. Well, you know, Joe wasn't very well liked by the protesters, but he was well liked by the Democrats, and even the Speaker of the House seems to go along with certain things that, even though he might pose as a guy who is all in favor of America,
	strangely enough, the Speaker of the House He's very much in favor of handing more money to Ukraine and handing more money to Israel as long as he gets some of the gravy that he wants.
	And if you've been following Thomas Massey, you'll see that there's a lot of different flavors to that gravy.
	Like Lindsey Graham introducing a lot of pork barrel spending bills into his Senate side of things.
	Which is interesting because...
	As I've mentioned, according to the Constitution, all spending bills are supposed to originate in the House.
	So, of course, that's one of the big questions people have about the Obamacare issue.
	But we'll continue. Real quick, you've got to hear this little bit from our friend, our pal, Amtrak Joe.
	In fact, there are no American soldiers in war in Ukraine, and I'm determined to keep it that way.
	Okay, so that's an outright lie.
	Of course, it can be parsed.
	There's no declaration of war.
	Of course, there hasn't been since World War II, which means that if any of you know soldiers or are soldiers who are being sent overseas, please tell them to stop.
	Because there's nothing constitutional in them going over there.
	In fact, there's really nothing constitutional to a standing army.
	It's supposed to be the militia.
	We are the militia.
	Anyone of gun-bearing age is the militia based in our states, and they can be called up with a declaration of war, and we can answer or not answer based on our own decisions to go out in a declaration of war.
	He also is lying because we know...
	Because he went and visited the 101st Airborne Division two years ago almost in Poland and openly stated, well, you're going to find out when you go into Ukraine that a lot of these people, they're very proud.
	Well, some of you know that already.
	Some of you have been there. So he let the cat out of the bag that the 101st Airborne had members in it who already had been on the ground advising Ukrainians.
	And new information has come out, of course, about the CIA bases there.
	We know that Victoria Nuland admitted to the fact that there were biological bases there.
	And if you go back in time, you'll see the articles.
	All about Richard Lugar and then-Senator Barack Obama going to Ukraine with billions of dollars to start up biological and chemical weapons research facilities.
	And of course, Victoria Nuland, when she answered Marco Rubio about it, he asked her, are there biological weapons laboratories in Ukraine?
	says, well, there are biological research facilities and we're trying to make sure that the Russians don't get their hands on the research materials as if there's just a bunch of pens left over. In fact, I should show you my David Knight pen that you can get at the David Knight dot com store, David Knight show dot com. Check it out and check out the new hoodie.
	For some reason, they don't have these in Ukraine. So that was an outright lie, as was much of what he had to say about the economy. And I would be interested to see how you feel. Are you does one get acclimated to being treated this way by the people who claim control and power over us?
	Is there a nascent growth of rebellious attitudes For many Americans, maybe you're meeting them in the stores or you have friends, you went to high school with them, you bump into them somewhere and say, hey, how you doing?
	Oh, I'm getting frustrated.
	You know, they got kids, maybe that sort of thing.
	And maybe they're adopting the philosophy that Thomas Jefferson espoused in so many great pieces of writing.
	But in particular, when he said, no man is born with a saddle on his back and no man is born with spurs to ride him.
	Let me know what you think in Rockfin and Rumble chat.
	And I would love to see what you have to say.
	Rumble, of course, very good free speech platform.
	So check it out, y'all. And Rockfin, I want to welcome Dougalug.
	Thank you for being there. Yona, thank you for being there.
	And Jason Barker.
	Jason, one of the great heroes in allowing people...
	And by the way, David Knight is just taking some time off today.
	And he's going to take some time off next week as well.
	With Easter coming up and so on.
	He's going to be with the family. Karen is there.
	Dougalug is there in Rockfin.
	And it's such a great home of people.
	Brian Deb McCartney is there.
	And... It's terrific to see you all.
	Really appreciate it. And remember, if you want to contribute to the program, you can do so during the show today.
	And I'll feel like I did something.
	Yeah. And...
	Oh, by the way, Yona is mentioning the rumors of Thomas Jefferson.
	And... Sally Hemmings.
	Just to let you know, I worked in a genetic research lab in college.
	My sister was in the lab.
	I was doing the data entry.
	So I got to read genetic trees very well, the protein bands, when they did it through electrophoresis.
	And so when they came out with the rumors that Thomas Jefferson, they really pushed those rumors that originally were pushed by an opponent of Thomas Jefferson politically and someone that he hired who used to work for Jefferson and then really disliked Jefferson.
	I saw the protein bans that they claimed were from Jefferson and I realized, and this is just solid knowledge, there's no possible way that Thomas Jefferson fathered Sally Hemings' kids.
	It was probably someone in Jefferson's family But they compared the electrophoresis gels of genetics of Thomas Jefferson and genetics of Sally Hemings and where the line had to be.
	And it couldn't have been Jefferson because there were certain things that would have had to have been passed down and they weren't passed down.
	Also, just to let you know, later on, Reason Magazine published a study that was done by 12 scholars and geneticists, and 11 of the 12 agreed that it wasn't Jefferson who fathered Sally Hemings' children.
	So I just wanted to mention that to you, Yona, if you want to check it out.
	You can probably still find the Reason Magazine coverage of that.
	It was many years ago.
	But strangely, of course, that information came out just at the time that Bill Clinton...
	Monica Lewinsky thing came around.
	As if, you know, you've got to find some equivalency of all that.
	So, I want to show you a couple other things that are happening with the Biden regime.
	First off, there's this.
	Biden renews vow to ban assault weapons to high-capacity magazines.
	And this, you'll see the protest.
	If it comes forward for us here.
	Let's get this rolling. There we go.
	Deserve the freedom to be safe.
	And America is safer today than when I took office.
	The year before I took office, murder rates went up 30%.
	30% they went up.
	The biggest increase in history.
	It was then.
	Through my American Rescue Plan, which every American voted against, I'm mad at.
	I think he means every Republican voted against that.
	Well, at least they tried to do that, probably not for constitutional reasons, probably just for political posturing.
	But you can see the Speaker shake his head there.
	That's, I think, the only good thing I've seen him do in the past week.
	Because Biden was clearly lying.
	Violent crime rates have risen throughout the United States.
	And of course, if you look at the gun purchase statistics, every time purchases of guns go up, the violent crime rate goes down in the United States.
	And of course, if you look at the history of England and Australia, when they imposed their big gun control measures, they've done it twice now in Australia, the violent crime rate Actually increased the first time, and the violent crime rate did not get back to its original normal levels from the 1990s.
	I think they imposed their first gun buyback in the late 1990s, maybe 1996 or 1999.
	That was after the Port Arthur massacre, and Harps would probably be able to speak more on that, but...
	He being from Australia underneath the Southern Cross.
	It's quite interesting because violent crime did not go down, including gun crime, did not go down to its original pre-ban levels until after people started to purchase more weapons in the black market.
	And then just about two years ago, the Australian government had to, or they said they had to, impose another mandated gun buyback.
	Yeah. Now, in England, they pretty much restricted all gun purchases and they limited gun ownership to you could own a.22 caliber gun, but it had to be at a hunting club.
	And now they're even trying to stop that.
	And it is quite amazing to me.
	To see that people like Khan and others in the UK will not acknowledge that all of their attempts to stop peaceful people from acquiring firearms have backfired.
	Just like Biden's attempt to claim That gun measures are going to equate to a safer society.
	And I brought this example up to people.
	I've said this before on my program.
	If you want an example of the behavior of criminals, John Lott has written a lot about this.
	If they are aware that, and they've interviewed criminals about hot burglaries versus cold burglaries.
	Hot burglaries are when they don't case a house.
	Cold burglaries are when they case a house to make sure nobody's there.
	The hot burglary rate is much higher in the UK and in Australia per capita.
	They've interviewed people in prisons, and it's in John Lott's first big book on guns, more guns, less crime.
	And they say, yeah, we case the place because we don't want to confront somebody who might be armed.
	Now, Imagine this.
	Imagine you're in a paintball competition.
	Someone bets you $10,000 that if you can enter one of three buildings and hit 20 people with a paintball pellet, you'll get $10,000.
	You've got to do it within 10 minutes or 7 minutes.
	But if you get hit by somebody who has a paintball gun, you will lose $40,000.
	Building 1 has, you know, you are assured that nobody in it has a paintball gun.
	Building 2 might have some people with paintball guns.
	You don't know. Building 3, you are assured every person has a paintball gun.
	What is going to happen to your behavior?
	Which building will you choose?
	It's very clear. It's very clear.
	And so, let's get more information about the amazing truth-telling of Joe Biden from a man who told us, watch out, everybody, because it looks like Joe Biden is going to be, of course, telling us a little bit we might not want to believe in the State of the Union.
	I do this on my program.
	I like to call it the mind meld.
	It's time for the mind meld, one and all.
	Our guest, James Bovard.
	I must try to mind-meld with it.
	Devils!
	Eternity ends...
	...until I meet you again.
	Mine's a merging, Doctor.
	Our minds are one.
	I feel what you feel.
	I know what you know.
	Ah, yes indeed.
	From my old days working at Star Trek Voyager, I now welcome our guest, We're good to go.
	With statistics or the reason for the economic problems we're having.
	And of course, we'll be blaming businesses.
	We're just trying to cater to customers.
	Welcome to the David Knight Show, James.
	Thank you for being here.
	Thank you for that article. And also your new book, which is phenomenal.
	I love it. I really appreciate all that you've done.
	Really, really good.
	Last rights. James Bovard, welcome to the show.
	Thanks. Hey, Garda, thanks for having me back.
	Great to see you again. It's good that both of us can take a victory lap for Biden's speech.
	Yes. Tell us a little bit about what you saw.
	I was struck.
	In fact, I was bowled over, but not necessarily surprised if those two can come together, the Beatles would say, because he opened with, well, America's national security is dependent upon Ukraine.
	That was the first thing in the State of the Union for the United States speech.
	That was just stunning.
	Then there were the other accoutrements about how quickly he was speaking.
	Maybe he thought that if he spoke more rapidly, people wouldn't notice his falsehoods.
	Tell us your impressions, Jim.
	Well, it was like the old Disney movie, Old Yeller, because he's there just kind of flapping away.
	And it was surprising to see that the...
	The entire White House and his re-election campaign has decided to go on a message of hatred.
	He was exaggerating so much the faults of people who did not support him.
	It reminded me of his speech in Near Valley Forge where he openly compared Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler.
	Which remind me of his Philadelphia speech in September 2022, where it was practically like a Nuremberg rally with the bright red background.
	But there was a level of vitriol.
	Historian Henry Adams 100 years ago said, politics has always been about the systematic organization of hatreds.
	Oh, wow. Great.
	That's the line to understand Biden's speech and his entire message.
	Donald Trump is not innocent on this score as well.
	Trump has hit the vitriol so hard.
	It's funny that you've got Biden claiming that the upcoming election will show the will of the people, but you've got two major candidates who are just...
	Doing so much demonizing and so many falsehoods.
	But Biden was there.
	He's supposed to be the State of the Union, and instead it's the absolute evil of everyone who doesn't bow down to Joe Biden.
	You know, James, as I show off your excellent X feed, it's at Jim Bovard, at Jim Bovard.
	And you have all the books out there, Last Rites Most Prominent.
	I want to show that on the screen to everybody.
	Just phenomenal stuff, Jim.
	Oh, absolutely. What a great book.
	And I love the fact that, you know, the look of it is so similar to Lost Rites.
	When did Lost Rites come out?
	Like 10 years ago?
	10 years ago. Put a knife in my heart.
	No, it was 30 years ago.
	Holy smoke. Yeah, it was 30 years ago, and that was back in the golden age of liberty.
	So I had some fun with the New York Post last weekend.
	On Saturday, I had a piece talking about Merle Haggard, and a song that he did, Is the Free Life Over, is the best of the free life behind us.
	And it's interesting to think, when he's saying that, it's like, hey, things are going to get a hell of a lot worse after that song came out.
	Oh, yeah. It's always strange.
	You think to yourself, oh, it couldn't get any worse.
	And it just gets crazier.
	Because, of course, it's the nature of people involved with the state to try to find more areas where they can get the state involved in people's lives.
	It gives them power. And you mentioned that use of the lever of hatred.
	Do you think it would be fair, Jim, to say that they also lever fear and they're sort of stranded together in a Gordian knot in a way?
	They will portray the Russia-Ukraine conflict and they'll gin up fear.
	Well, the United States, we've got to defend, we've got to do this, we've got to do that.
	In a way, it helps generate hatred against the thing that which we're supposed to fear.
	Yeah, well, Biden last night was saying that it's perfectly clear that if Russia has not stopped in Ukraine, then they'll go further and attack other nations.
	And it's like, well, do you have any evidence, sir?
	Yes. Right. And, you know, the sad thing is, is about the only evidence, the only source of evidence that we had on government information, accurate government information on Ukraine, just pled guilty of going to prison for 16 years.
	That gentleman from the Massachusetts National Guard, Airman.
	Yes. And he shared that information on his Discord.
	Yeah, and it's striking to see that the media that has basically...
	The information which he disclosed, the official documents, showed that most of the U.S. media has been shoveling official BS on Ukraine for the last two years, ever since the start of the war.
	And yet there wasn't that much media rage at having been lied to and deceived.
	Instead, a lot of the media folks jumped on and said, well...
	That son of a gun violated government rules by disclosing this information.
	Yeah, fine, throw him in prison and throw away the key.
	It's sad. I mean, it's sad to see how far the nation has fallen since Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers over 50 years ago.
	It's one, you know, Jim, obviously, you know, I've admired your work so long, but the way that you, with such fluidity, can mention these people because they really deserve to be brought in as we remember them and maybe gain some sustenance and energy from some of the things that they did that we admire, you know, in Ellsberg, 100%.
	I'll bring up, as you discussed, this Air National Guardsman from Massachusetts.
	He lived 45 minutes an hour away from where I am in New Hampshire.
	It was all the news in Boston, obviously.
	The New York Times somehow found out about it, released that information.
	What is interesting is you're absolutely right.
	First, you have written on this numerous times.
	There's such a glut of stuff that the government produces that is so-called classified during a time of no declared war in any way whatsoever.
	And even when people issue FOIA requests, much of the stuff is redacted.
	Whether it's, you know, FOIA requests to get information about the mRNA jabs, or it's FOIA requests about anything else, the government is still in control of what they're going to tell you.
	And one of the things that you just brought up to me, I would like to show this to you.
	You can listen to the audio, Jim.
	Marco Rubio literally admitting on Fox News Sunday that all along, all along he knew, he knew all along that Ukraine was not going to be successful in its quixotic quest to battle Russia.
	After of course nine years of slaughter in the Donbass with the Nazi Azov battalion related people that the United States seemed to have no problem with in any way whatsoever.
	After Amy Klobuchar and others and Lindsey Graham met with Tiani Baka of the Slobodan party, the Nazi party there, and they helped cobble together that government under Yatsenyuk in 2014.
	This is Marco Rubio actually openly admitting what that young man exposed, but of course not acknowledging like, well, yeah, you know, yeah, we should have told you from the start.
	And we should remember as we hear this, he voted every time there was the major final vote for more weapons and money to go to Ukraine, even though now he's admitting, well, you know, I knew all along that there was no possibility they could win.
	Let's check this out. Sure to do that.
	Here's what I do know. There is no way that the Russian Federation takes Ukraine, all of Ukraine, half of Ukraine.
	And that was Putin's goal from the beginning, was to carve it up into at least half the country, including Kyiv.
	That's not gonna happen.
	That's not gonna happen. On the other side of it, the reality of it is that Ukraine is small compared to Russia in terms of size and its ability to bring scale, its ability to force conscript people.
	I'm just being honest.
	In the past, I have tried not to talk about this publicly because I thought it undermined the leverage that Ukraine had.
	But now it's the reality. Neither side is going to be able to achieve victory as defined in the most idealistic term.
	Alright, so Jim, you know, it's really amazing how many tens of thousands of people in Ukraine have had their homes destroyed.
	Men and women now have been pulled into that meat grinder.
	And now, Joe Biden wants even more money to go to Ukraine, and he's going to find a way to use the so-called drawdown authority to pull more from the U.S. military banks and send it over to Ukraine, even after we just found out, as Antiwar.com reported, and I'll show this to the audience, Antiwar.com reported, That there were a hundred arms deals that were secretly done between the Biden administration and Israel after October 7th.
	They are reckless.
	They have no compunction whatsoever.
	They will lie to us.
	They will lie through omission as Marco Rubio did for months and years actually with Ukraine.
	And they don't care. Well, it was interesting seeing that clip from Marco Rubio.
	So the senator admitted that he made a lot of misleading statements, but it was okay because otherwise he was being careful not to undermine the leverage of a foreign government.
	Now, I don't recall the oath of office of a U.S. senator saying that they have a legal moral obligation to maintain the leverage of foreign governments But that was what he was saying.
	That's somebody backing up outside the office.
	I'm thinking like, what the hell is this?
	Anyhow, uh-oh, my computer is dying.
	But no, so going back to Rubio, I mean, it's good he's honest about his previous deceit.
	Do we trust him going forward?
	Yeah, I don't think so.
	I'm not sure. No, I won't make that crude joke.
	It's only veracity.
	It's only honesty based on its situational ethics.
	It's pure situational ethics.
	For him, it doesn't matter.
	It's a consequentialist philosophy.
	There's no morality to it in any way whatsoever.
	Truth doesn't matter. It's whatever is convenient to get by with what you want at the time.
	Well, and part of what I was wondering, watching the scene there in the Capitol last night, before and after Biden's speech, seeing all these folks, men and women out there glad-handing each other, and seeing a lot of those older, well-fed women wearing their white dresses.
	I was thinking, so Sandra, I don't recall seeing Sandra Menendez there.
	I assume he was there. He's been indicted for taking a lot of bribes from foreign lobbyists, activists, But at least he appreciates the value of gold versus the U.S. monetary system.
	That's a good point. Yeah, there's gold bars.
	And so I was wondering there.
	I said, how many of the people in that room, how many of them deserve to be indicted on the same kind of federal charges that the Biden Justice Department and earlier Justice Departments used against American citizens?
	Because there are so many...
	The members of Congress are practically exempt from federal law.
	I mean, a person has to be so brazen, a person has to be so damn greedy and stupid that they have gold bars and hundreds of thousands of dollars of cash laying around their house as the allegations are against Senator Menendez, because otherwise it's going to be like,
	you know, Well, you know, well, it's important, whatever, but to see what the politicians as a class get away with, at the same time, the government is persecuting private citizens for, I mean, don't give me this rule of law, BS. Yeah, so true.
	So true. And you know how I'm a volunteerist anarchist, obviously, James.
	You're a moderate. What's that?
	I was making a joke.
	I said you are a moderate.
	I'm a moderate. Okay, maybe you're not a moderate.
	Okay. I'm a moderate compared to you.
	How about that? That sounds great.
	And it is interesting because we often hear this, are we, which is of course the pronoun of forced inclusion, are we going to do this?
	Are we going to do this?
	We have to do this.
	We must do this. America cares and so on and so forth.
	When the government institutes policies of forced inclusion, Forcing people to pay for something.
	The we is a pronoun of aggressive inclusion.
	You have no choice.
	You're going to be included no matter what.
	You are part of the we, whether you want to be part of it or not.
	It's the will of the people.
	This state of the union on a macro level exposes the absolute canard Of the idea that there's any rule of anything for these people.
	Because if I don't want to be part of their union, can I say no?
	Of course not. They'll throw me in jail.
	I've got to keep paying or I've got to flee to some other place.
	I didn't see that I signed up for that.
	I never signed the Constitution.
	And even if I had signed the Constitution, these people are breaching it all the time.
	They're the ones who sign up to swear an oath to it and put their hands on the Bible, right?
	And so we look at things like all their ridiculous controls on light bulbs and their attempts to control ceiling fans and eliminate the internal combustion engine car and all these different things that they add and add and add, of course, because they make us fear what could be coming.
	They don't provide real evidence regarding the climate change, anthropogenic climate change boogeyman.
	Or whatever it might be regarding car outputs from internal combustion engines.
	Got to do it for us.
	Then they have the audacity to say they're saving us money.
	Of course, in the free market, we have to decide when do we want to save money, how do we want to do it, and in what process.
	We have trade-offs.
	They don't allow that.
	So this inclusive we thing is perfect, and it just shows the lie.
	Because if it were a real union...
	I would have a choice, just like the South would have had a choice, to be able to separate and say, no thank you.
	I can't perpetuate my union with somebody else.
	So how is it I get roped into all this stuff?
	I never said yes.
	Well, it's just good you're not bitter.
	Hey, by the way, Jim, let's talk about the economy for a minute and the shrinkflation claims of Joe Biden, right?
	So your piece that was published on the 6th, I have the New York Post version of this.
	Joe Biden's State of the Union shrinkflation swindle.
	And you bring up an excellent point, which is, of course, that since Biden took office, The purchasing power of the U.S. dollar has shrunk by 18%.
	This is 18% according to the federal government.
	If the U.S. government was still using the same measures of inflation that were used in the 1970s, I guess it would be 25%, 28% decrease.
	It's a whole lot worse than what they admit.
	Yeah. And, of course, part of the reason is because they exclude certain things from their cost of living indexes.
	And they also, you know, they do this all the time with things like the employment numbers.
	You know, they'll exclude certain things. Oh, my God.
	Yeah, they had a hell of an adjustment this morning on that.
	Yeah, tell us about that.
	Well, actually, you know, my goodness.
	Yeah. They always do that.
	And we knew that, you know, after about the first week heading into the second week, we start to get the inflation numbers and the employment numbers.
	And at first, they always put out their rosy employment numbers, and then they adjust them.
	And they'll put out, like Biden will claim, well...
	Unemployment or inflation.
	Inflation has gone down.
	So they're implying that prices are going down.
	But, for example, there was a couple-month period, not an entire period, but for a couple months last year, there was a slight change from, say, 3.5% inflation down to 3.25% inflation month-on-month.
	And then it went back up to 3.5%, that sort of thing.
	So they claim that, well, inflation is going down.
	But Year on year, inflation, that means it's gone up.
	The prices of things have gone up.
	And of course, the inflation is really the inflation of the money supply, the debasement of the money supply.
	And even under Donald Trump, people are aware, if you've got the government spending trillions of dollars in the CARES Act, That's money that's being invented out of nowhere.
	No wonder Bitcoin is doing so well.
	No wonder gold is on the rise.
	No wonder silver is on the rise.
	Because those things, you can't just invent them out of thin air.
	I mean, there are so many different wrenches the government has thrown into the nation's economic engine.
	But part of what struck me, Biden was doing his fingerprinting on the shrinkflation on the decreased number of chips in a bag, a snack bag of snack food.
	But Biden has given himself an absolute waiver for all the damage he's inflicted.
	It's the same as what the feds did for Pfizer and their COVID vaccines.
	An absolute waiver of liability for any damage.
	I mean, everything that Biden has done that screwed up the nation's productivity, investment, savings, you know, value of the dollar, it doesn't matter because Biden is taking a brave stand against decreasing the number of potato chips in the snack bag.
	You had a video.
	I'm going to show this on the screen.
	You had a video and they showed the snack bag.
	You can sort of see it in the background on the screen there.
	It really is amazing too because they are always ready with the bad guy.
	As I mentioned, the boogeyman.
	And it's truly a sad thing to think that politicians come up with these things and so often people just accept the idea of, well, there can be calls for, say, antitrust laws.
	Chuck Schumer doesn't like the number of cereal boxes that are on the shelves.
	Bernie Sanders doesn't understand why there's more than only a couple brands of antiperspirant or deodorant.
	I don't know whether he wore that when he was in Moscow celebrating the great economic wonders of Russia just before the collapse.
	That and his face mask last night.
	Oh, unbelievable. What I'm curious about...
	Oh, sorry, Jim. Go ahead. Yeah, so I was going to say thanks for pulling up the screen on the shot there.
	The folks at New York Post made a video yesterday.
	They had me doing a spiel for the article, and it's the first time I've been on the New York Post YouTube video channel.
	And they were very, very good at that.
	It was great.
	Yeah, the way they did inserts and Cookie Monster and so on.
	It was fun.
	It was fun. And it was very deft on their part.
	And they dropped some of the things I said and kept others.
	And they had the funny thing about the Seinfeld shrinkage thing.
	Yes. Which I'd suggest.
	With George Costanza. Yeah, yeah.
	And it's shrinkage.
	It's shrinkage. And it's like, you know, but the real trouble with buying is the purchasing power of the dollars that I have have shrunk 18%.
	So I don't give a raspitude about potato chips, but hey, and I'm an independent contractor.
	I mean, there is a number of places that I write for that have not adjusted their pay scales.
	I don't forget it, but it's not like I'm a government worker that I snap my finger and say, give me my COLA. There was 9% inflation in 2022, whatever, so give me that 9% raise.
	I'm an independent contractor.
	I don't have that leverage.
	Yeah, and it's very frustrating because, you know, I think you probably echo many of the conversations people have had with their friends and family members saying, look, you know, my capacity to expand my earnings can only expand a certain amount as I try to work harder, do more, you know, take on a second job or something like that.
	But my costs are going up, so we've got to cut back.
	We've got to do this. We've got to do that.
	Yeah, you know, and it's It's really sad because, of course, there's so many rich experiences people could have or visits people could have with each other or just some of the more essential fundamentals of, well, you know, we're going to have to – grandma's going to, you know, have to go to a different facility.
	We can't afford this facility over this facility or – And, you know, this medicine.
	And it's really, it's a real shame.
	We can't get the medicine for the dog this time.
	We're going to have to do a fundraiser because we're out of money.
	I don't have a job, that sort of thing.
	And the prices are just out of control.
	And I don't see that these people have anything other than a thirst for more control of our lives rather than freeing up the competitive market.
	Yeah. Yeah.
	Yeah, there was a great example.
	Back when inflation was at its peak, the Washington Post had a columnist that they ran a piece by, and she was kind of poo-pooing concerns about inflation, and she was talking about things that people could do to save money on means such as stop eating meat.
	And she also talked about the cost of pet care, and it's kind of like, well, people can save money by just letting their pets die.
	Yeah. Oh, this is a great idea.
	This is something Biden should pick up in his speech.
	Your dog has lived long enough.
	Oh, man. Well, Jim, it is very interesting because for a long time as they pushed for the Obamacare thing, we always heard them Attacking insurance companies and saying, well, you're cherry-picking people.
	But we know that in any centrally planned, government-run, collectivized resource system, they are going to pick and choose who gets the resources.
	And we're all going to be fighting over these things.
	It is the tragedy of the commons.
	Everybody's going to want their piece that they can try to get to get the opportunity to get it.
	Great example... Yeah.
	That's an interesting, that was what struck me as the theme of Biden's speech unspoken, but it's that people like him decide that people like Biden deserve to be in charge of who gets what.
	Yes, yes. It was like listening to the Supreme Soviet.
	To a degree. I mean, or a six-hour Castro speech.
	Yeah, yeah. But there was this...
	It kept coming back that Biden should be the one who has the power to say who gets the subsidized food, gets their loans forgiven, gets this, gets that, is allowed to have that, to go there.
	And it seems...
	It was amusing that Biden was...
	Towards the end of the speech, he tried to portray himself as a champion of freedom.
	But the only freedom that Biden recognizes is the freedom to terminate pregnancies.
	Ah, so sad.
	And of course, take my neighbor's money to help fund it.
	There you go. It's truly troubling.
	So what's next on your radar scope, James Bovard?
	Ha ha! I guess I'll probably keep working my ass off and throwing rocks at the government.
	So, you know, just wheeling and dealing and, you know, I've got some stories I'm working on and, you know, there were several fresh targets that popped up from the buying spiel last night.
	So, you know, I'm just looking forward to try to keep having some fun.
	Well, it's great.
	I've got the Jim Bovard website right in front of us.
	Your new book, Last Rites.
	Absolutely. The Death of American Liberty.
	And it's just excellent stuff.
	And of course, if people go over there, you always have your latest columns listed.
	And I highly recommend people watch that video that they put together.
	From the New York Post.
	It is fantastic. And you are terrific on the screen, Jim.
	And it's so great to be able to see you talking like that because I miss you so much.
	You're such a good guy.
	In fact, they're having another Liberty Forum here in New Hampshire coming up this coming week.
	Tulsi Gabbard's going to be there.
	Glenn Jacobs is going to be there.
	Yeah. So I'm hoping to get on over there in Nashville, New Hampshire.
	I wish you were there, man.
	That was great. Was that the year that Naomi Wolf was there as well?
	That was the year, yes.
	Yes, yes. That was in 2014.
	Yeah, she was nice.
	She wasn't as open to the larger scope of liberty at that time, but she's really expanded a lot recently, especially speaking about the jabs and the corruption there.
	It's been nice to see people really standing up against a lot of the people who would try to connect them still to their old collectivist ways.
	Yeah. Of course, you've always been an outstanding guy.
	And thank you so much. I hope people will check out that video at New York Post and we'll watch you as you continue to throw the bricks.
	Okay, Jim? Hey, thanks so much for having me on.
	Thanks for your kind words. Oh, not a problem.
	And you just remember, we're all in this together, whether you want to be or not.
	Wink, wink. Have fun.
	Thanks. All right.
	James Bovard, thank you, Jim.
	Appreciate you being here.
	Great, great stuff from James Bovard.
	What a terrific guy.
	Please visit jimbovard.com, everybody.
	If you like the Eagles, the cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, they say the horror You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	download our app or listen now at APS radio dot com
	.
	Making sense.
	Common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right, everyone.
	And boy, what a wonderful film, Last of the Mohicans, huh?
	Michael Mann, just amazing, amazing photography.
	Great music. I had that soundtrack myself.
	I know David loves that soundtrack, and so do I. And I think, yes, I might have had a little crush on Madeline Stowe at the time as well.
	She, boy, what a terrific actress.
	Twelve monkeys. Just awesome.
	And she came back in the 12 Monkeys TV series, too.
	So, Last of the Mohicans.
	Great work from David Knight putting that music together.
	And now let's talk about another man who does great work.
	He is the co-owner of Cape Gunworks in Hyannis, Massachusetts.
	The man who hosts Rapid Fire and...
	The man who fills in for Grace Curley often and is featured every Tuesday at 2 in the afternoon on the Grace Curley Show, heard on many radio stations all around North America.
	He is Toby Leary talking to us.
	Toby, welcome to the program, the David Knight Show, as I get to fill in, and thanks for joining me on this platform as you work on your platform to inform people about their Second Amendment, the rights that are supposed to be protected by the Second Amendment, and some of the big news that has been happening as various political forces try to attack it.
	Welcome, Toby. Thanks for being here, man.
	Hey, thanks for having me, Gard.
	I appreciate it. It's always great to be with you, and I appreciate the time that you give me and love talking about the Second Amendment.
	So, easy. It's too easy for me.
	Well, your knowledge is incredible, and you always have to update these things.
	Like I said, it blows my mind because you know about the materials, the guns, the history, the stuff in your store, the people you work with.
	But then you take calls on Tuesdays with Grace and people will give you these questions out of nowhere and you say, well, you know, and you almost always have a very good answer or a resource to which they can turn.
	And I want to use you as a resource in a way here today, Toby, because I wrote a little bit about the Supreme Court arguments on the bump stock ban, which I just, they blew me away.
	They were so ridiculous from Elena Kagan.
	And even Brett Kavanaugh didn't understand as they were looking at the 1934 Firearms Act to see whether or not the 1934 Firearms Act, which was a tax on machine guns and short-billed shotguns and things like that, a few other things, whether that would apply to the executive order to categorize.
	So the debate was, well, can it be done through executive order or does it have to be done through other legislation?
	Can the ATF do it or does Congress have to do it?
	Neither of which would be constitutional.
	And then not even mentioning that the 1934 Firearms Act wasn't an outright ban.
	It was a tax. It was an excise tax.
	Which is the only thing that's provided for by the Constitution.
	But then not even going deeper than that, which is if you actually take it logically, and this is my presupposition here, Any requirement that the government tells you you must abide by this in order to exercise your right is an infringement.
	So if they tell you you've got to pay a tax or you can't buy this thing, well, that's an infringement.
	I mean, it's a prima facie infringement.
	They're telling you you can only exercise your right based on the conditions we provide to you.
	What do you think of what you saw?
	And then feel free to comment on any of the things that I brought up about this amazingly fatuous line of argumentation from some of these Supreme Court justices.
	Yeah, I think your points are very perceptive, Garda.
	I think that, ironically, the one right that is enumerated that says shall not be infringed is the one that gets infringements to a degree that we would not tolerate for any other right.
	That is enumerated.
	We don't have a license for free speech, for choosing what church we want to go to.
	I hope I'm not giving them any ideas here.
	Well, they already have the FCC for broadcast licensing.
	So let's stop it at that, right?
	Exactly. But for an individual to participate.
	It's interesting because people think that A, that Well, I shouldn't say people.
	I think they're more savvy to this than those that become elected officials who become drunk with power think that they are the grantor of rights, and they are not.
	That's really what our Declaration acknowledges, is the fact that these truths are self-evident.
	If you're paying attention, we understand these don't come from man.
	You know that all men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights.
	You can't take them away.
	You can't put conditions or liens on them.
	That's what inalienable means.
	But let's get back to the subject matter at hand.
	The Supreme Court, I was a little disappointed in the direction this whole thing took.
	Maybe it's the direction it needed to go.
	But really, I thought the more important question was, do bureaucracies, unelected officials, not lawmakers, have the authority to change the rules as you go?
	And so for two and a half administrations, We had bump stocks were legal.
	They came with an ATF letterhead that said, yep, this is not a machine gun.
	That is the way it was under the Bush administration.
	That's the way it was under the Obama administration and halfway through the Trump administration.
	It's an accessory.
	It was just an accessory, yes.
	They acknowledged it doesn't change a thing to the firearm.
	You put this stock on, it helps you hold your finger straight and still while the recoil of the gun bounces back and forth against your trigger finger.
	All it does is makes you pull the trigger faster.
	That's it.
	It shows, I think, it's a mark of their dishonesty as they continue to try to fudge lines for anybody who takes even a scintilla of a second to think about the way that the trigger works and the way the bump stock works.
	That should be a red flag to anybody listening to them.
	Yeah, and I think the more dangerous part of the equation is the fact that the bureaucracy...
	Sorry, I'm just having someone shut the door.
	The shop's getting a little loud out there.
	Oh, no problem. You might have noticed the...
	So you got the shots coming through.
	That's great because you're right there in the range.
	And I'm showing shots right now of your site.
	I got to get down to that range.
	You probably saw that it was funny because I clicked on some stuff and everything flashed up on me.
	You might have seen my face like, whoa, you got a great site.
	Yeah. So, yeah, so the more dangerous part of the equation here that I didn't hear them discuss is whether or not these three-letter agencies...
	Because this can be extrapolated not just from the ATF. We've seen it happen with EPA. We've seen it happen with IRS. We've seen it happen with FBI. A lot of three-letter enforcement agencies have changed the way that they interpret things.
	And ironically, they're the maybe the reason they didn't talk about that is because there's a case before the Supreme Court called Loper Bright.
	And it's a it's a basically a fishing company who challenged Chevron deference, which is basically what has given the power to these bureaucracies to have broad interpretation of law that is passed by Congress.
	So Congress passes a law.
	It's kind of ambiguous.
	Then they turn to these three letter agencies and say, go enforce the law.
	And well, it doesn't say every scenario that I have to, you know, rule on because the Congress isn't that savvy or doesn't get that granular.
	So they've been given wide powers to enforce the law.
	And the Loper Bright case is really interesting because this is how far they will take it.
	They it was a fishing boat that the EPA said or whatever it was, the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife said, we need to know that you're not overfishing the stocks.
	So we need to have an observer on board the boat.
	And by the way, you need to foot the bill for the observer.
	You know, you got to pay a salary, which means you can have one less fisherman on the boat because you're only limited to how many people you can have on the boat.
	And you also got to pay their per diem, you know, cost for the day.
	$800 or so.
	Yeah, yeah. And so the fishing companies are like, what?
	You know, you gave us the regulation to follow.
	We're following it. It's up to you to go investigate if you think I'm breaking the law, but don't make me pay for my own investigation.
	That's ridiculous.
	And you know, Toby, when I first went to work at MRCTV under contract with them, I think one of the first articles I wrote was about those fishing counters.
	Because when I saw the piece and I proposed it, I thought, oh, this Some machine.
	And then I looked into it. This is years ago.
	Then I looked into it. And that was just their first standard that they had imposed on the fishermen, especially around New England.
	They were the ones who were protesting it very strongly, especially Massachusetts guys.
	And they were saying, look...
	You are telling us, literally, that we have to take a human being from the federal government and house him on our boat.
	Because sometimes these guys are out overnight doing fishing.
	So this is like the housing of troops, the quartering of troops, of federal agents in your private property, and they've got to give them a bunk with the fishermen.
	And they've got to now the next standard, as you say, the next standard that came out of that is they changed it to say, well, originally the U.S. government would pay for those fish counters who literally are standing there counting the fish, right?
	As if the fishermen don't have an incentive not to overfish, right?
	If they would allow for private property claims over regions and where the fish swim, they could handle it much better.
	But the government is taking control, even though there's nothing in the Constitution that allows them to take that control.
	They have to amend their Constitution, but they've done it.
	And now they're expanding it, as you say, under the Chevron deference, going back to this other Supreme Court, the Chevron case, where they say, well, we allow the agencies within certain parameters to imagine the scenarios under which they would be OK to operate based on the legislation passed by the Congress to create this bureaucracy like the EPA or the fisheries or whatever.
	And the ones that go a little too far, well, then we'll stop those.
	So this is a question. Is it a little too far to now make the fishermen pay For their own monitors that come on there and tell them, no, you can't do this.
	For their own oppression.
	They're already paying taxes.
	Now they've got to pay more.
	And this is what is up in this case.
	And you know so much about these things that you've opened up a whole other line.
	It's only tangentially connected to the ATF and its regulatory claims to power and things like that and the bump stocks.
	But it's the same mindset.
	Right. And, you know, I say a lot.
	So back up a little bit.
	I was a little disheartened to hear that that isn't the direction that this took.
	It went more into the nuance of what a machine gun is, which is important because the Supreme Court, if they are able to, like you mentioned Kagan, she had a whole line of questioning and basically said, I am a textualist.
	The big butt comes out and it says the end result is really...
	We've got to use common sense.
	Whenever you hear common sense, it should set off alarm bells everywhere.
	But we've got to look at the common sense of, you know, what the intent of the shooter is.
	And I'm like, wait a minute here.
	If you're looking at intent of the shooter...
	You got guys like Jerry Michalik that set world records for how fast they can pull the trigger.
	The intent of him is to fire at a high rate of fire for world record reasons and for competition and for fun and everything else.
	So are we going to start regulating people's fingers?
	Are we going to ban rubber bands that might build up some trigger strength and make it so you can pull the trigger faster?
	Along those lines, guard, there's a guy, he's passed away now.
	His name was Bob Mundin.
	Look up his video sometime.
	It's the fastest gun in the West or whatever.
	He was an exhibition shooter, but he could literally shoot a Single action gun where you have to cock the hammer and then pull the trigger like the old Western Cowboys.
	He could fire two shots that sounded like one.
	And if it wasn't for high speed cameras and super slow motion, you wouldn't believe it.
	So, you know, are we going to ban guys like Bob Munden from being able to do exhibition shooting because the intent of the shooter is to shoot really, really, really fast?
	I think if the Supreme Court is going to rule on a case based on intention instead of what the actual statute says, we have a big problem.
	This is a slippery slope where you could now say gun oil is...
	Is a modification to a firearm that allows the shooter to shoot quicker because the bolt isn't all gummed up.
	You're able to, you know, lube it and get it to shoot faster.
	I mean, where does that end?
	That's a very frightening, slippery slope.
	You know, you're right.
	I mean, it could even go into the shape of the stocks, the type of barrel that you have.
	So many different types of things that people get for their own comfort.
	They're government subjective.
	We will decide what is or is not too much of an improvement up to them.
	They could outright ban all sorts of things.
	And it is amazing to me for these people to be even arguing about what type of firearm that they're told they're not supposed to touch.
	They're going to touch.
	They're already assuming what was supposed to be a negative.
	They're assuming it as a positive, as you said.
	It is the most infringed upon and it is the most explicitly Forbidden thing to infringe.
	Right up until the turn of the 19th into the 20th century.
	In fact, Maine has in its statutes that it can fund religious schools.
	New Hampshire in its constitution says New Hampshire State can give gifts to seminaries.
	So there's no separation on the state level or the local level on that level.
	But the Second Amendment is very, very clear.
	It shall not be infringed by any level of the state, of the polis, because that is a threat to you.
	They are pointing government guns at you.
	And I often argue, anybody who says, oh, I'm opposed, you're opposed to gun violence?
	Oh, yes, absolutely. So then you want to disarm police officers.
	You don't want an armed government.
	You oppose so-called gun violence.
	Gun confiscation or gun control laws.
	Oh, no, I'm in favor of gun control laws.
	Well, then you're in favor of threats of gun violence by the state.
	That's very clear. I mean, it's absurd.
	That's the net result of gun control is you want it tipped to one side.
	You want a disarmed populace and an armed government, which we have a rich history of where that all leads.
	And I don't think we want to repeat that.
	But, you know, we talked earlier about licensure and There was a Supreme Court case in 1943 called Murdoch v.
	Pennsylvania. And if you look it up, the concurring opinion, actually not even the concurring, the majority opinion in the actual decision says that You can't tax, you can't sell a license, you can't issue a permit or charge a fee for the enjoyment of any federally protected constitutional right.
	Period. So how is it that they can have that decision?
	Because it's interesting, when I did an MRCTV video about the arguments, and I wrote it on Sunday, and then I shot it on Monday.
	And so they put it out on the Supreme Court.
	No, I shot it on Tuesday, and they just put it out the day before yesterday.
	And I went through some of these arguments.
	The logical syllogism here is very clear.
	That if the government is demanding from you an action on your part, otherwise you cannot exercise your right, that's an infringement.
	So if they're telling you you have to cough up 10% of the cost of this thing that you're buying to us, otherwise you're going to be breaking the law and we're going to point our government guns at you.
	In fact, we're already pointing our government guns at you to make you do this, then that's an infringement.
	And so how does that comport?
	How do they continue to put these taxes on things?
	Why is it that they allow for taxes on things like ammunition or things like that?
	You know, as a guy who deals with this at Cape Gunworks, I don't understand how they can continue to do these sorts of things.
	And in Massachusetts, it's becoming even worse.
	They just keep pushing it. We'll talk about that.
	But on that tax level, I don't understand.
	How do they get away with this stuff?
	Well, they've got away with it for decades, that's how.
	And they've had lower court decisions like district court and circuit court of appeals have upheld the state laws that impose such nonsense.
	And it wasn't really until Heller started it all.
	Back in 2008, we just celebrated the 15th anniversary of the Heller decision.
	And in that decision, they defined what an arm was, which was defined based on the lexiographers of the 18th century.
	And it is any arm...
	That is bearable and useful for offensive or defensive purposes, and that is in common and ordinary use.
	And so that is the definition of an arm.
	If you ban it, you're breaking your oath of office and you're...
	You're passing unconstitutional law.
	So that was what started it.
	The problem was the court didn't give a clear mandate to the inferior or lower courts about how to rule on this.
	So it was still the Wild Wild West.
	There were very few pro Second Amendment rulings that challenged state and federal law after Heller.
	There was a couple wins along the way, but there were more defeats than wins.
	Then came along the Bruin decision back in 2022, which acknowledged Heller as good law.
	It was the way that that decision was written.
	It was reaffirmed as good law and the basis of the Bruin decision.
	And basically then the Bruin decision gave clear marching orders to the inferior courts and to the lower courts to basically rule on the text of the Second Amendment.
	If it isn't in the text, then the burden of proof shifts to the government to prove that there was a historical analog at the time of our ratification of the Second Amendment in 1791.
	And if they can't prove there was this vast history of the type of ban or the type of infringement that they are proposing or that they have passed, and it has to be contextually appropriate.
	It has to be the same type of law in the same type of vein of which it was originally written.
	And it can't be one or two or three municipalities or cities or states that have passed this.
	It has to be a rich history, overwhelming support for that law that you're trying to propose or uphold.
	That is what the text history and tradition means that was put out in Heller first and now reaffirmed by Bruin.
	And now the courts have been told by the Supreme Court, this is the way that you must look at all Second Amendment related issues is first in the text.
	And then you can look to the historical analogs and traditions at the time of the ratification.
	And if you can't find anything, guess what?
	It's unconstitutional.
	Right.
	And that's where all that.
	So the gun grabbers right now are in full bore, linear panic mode.
	They know that their time is short and they have to just throw everything at it and hope it sticks.
	And that's what they're doing.
	You see States like New York, you see States like Massachusetts where I'm from, where they're all just throwing it against the wall, hoping it sticks, knowing the sands of time on their gun control schemes is running out.
	And they are eventually gonna have to figure out how to deal with criminals and figure out how to deal with violent crime if they truly wanna make our streets safer, which they don't.
	But if they did, that's the direction they would take instead of requiring lawful people to give up their arms.
	The point I'm trying to make in all of this is...
	There's been a little bit of a shift.
	So, you know, you ask how they've got away with it, because in places like Massachusetts, the District Court and the First Circuit Court of Appeals is very anti-gun.
	And most gun control challenges died at the district court level.
	Some got appealed to the First Circuit where they died.
	And then when it went to the Supreme Court, it wasn't granted certiorari.
	So we had a case called Warman v.
	Healy, which was a challenge to our assault weapons ban that did make it all the way to the Supreme Court.
	And it wasn't granted cert.
	So the problem is hundreds of thousands of dollars and years and years and years and decades of time man hours were spent getting it there and then it wasn't granted a hearing.
	So that was pre-Bruin.
	And I've heard arguments on that as to the pro-gun justices allowed it to die because they didn't think they had the votes prior to the three new justices that were appointed and affirmed.
	So they pulled a tactic to say, oh, we'll keep it out until maybe there's a change, and then maybe on appeal there'll be a new version of a similar, and we'll have a more conservative set of justices here.
	Very interesting. Yeah, Roberts is the swing voter right now.
	No one really knows where he's going.
	Even in this latest Cargill, the Bumpstock case, we don't really know where Roberts is going to come down on, and neither do we on...
	I was going to say, God bless Mr.
	Cargill. What's his name?
	Who's the guy from Texas who runs that facility?
	I can't remember his name.
	I've seen him on radio, too.
	The courage of these people to spend this money, I was going to say...
	Do you think that in some cases, legislators or, you know, even some of these regulators, Toby, and your experience, let me show you the website, everybody.
	It's Cape Gun Works.
	If you're in Massachusetts, New England, check it out.
	It's very, very cool.
	And I'm showing right now your Rapid Fire program.
	Let's mention Rapid Fire.
	As you say, go live Tuesday with Grace Curley on 2A Tuesday.
	But you've got Rapid Fire, your own show.
	Tell people about how they can find you.
	Yeah, thank you, Gard. Go to rapidfireradio.us or Cape Gunworks and click on Rapid Fire.
	And you can find our show.
	We go live. If you want to hear it live, you can sign up to be notified whenever we go live.
	You just got to like and subscribe on social media and hit the alert buttons and you'll be up to date on that.
	But we go live consistently every week.
	Wednesday from 4 to 6 p.m.
	It is a live show. You can call in or interact with me on the chat and ask questions.
	We do Q&A. We also talk about all the news of the week around the Second Amendment.
	And we archive the show.
	So if you go to YouTube or whatever...
	Platform you like, Rumble.
	We're all over Rumble, which is good.
	Oh, yeah. They're great.
	Yeah, they're awesome. And we haven't been deplatformed from Rumble yet, but we've been put in time out by all the other typical big tech.
	And right now, our Facebook account is completely down.
	So it's amazing.
	I used to get...
	De-platformed for holding a gun and talking about it.
	And now it's just talking about it.
	You talk about guns, you get put in time.
	Wow. It's unbelievable.
	Anyway. And there's so many people who are interested in getting these tips.
	It's just amazing to me.
	Oh, and it was Michael Cargill from Austin, Texas.
	Yeah, Michael Cargill. And let me ask you, Toby.
	Do you think that some of these people do it just out of spite?
	We've got Trump.
	He responded with the bump stock thing because there was this fear generated and so on.
	He should not have done it.
	It was very, very clear.
	Some people think that maybe it was part of a larger plan to introduce even more government regulations on accessories and parts and things like that.
	you know, whether they want to ascribe those asinine motives of Trump or the darker motives of Trump, who knows. But either way, on the state legislative side, many of these legislators must know that when they're proposing these new ideas, and we'll go through a couple of the things that you're battling in Massachusetts, they must know that under the Bruin standard, those aren't going to stick. And one of the things that you and I've discussed
	before is that under the Heller decision, one of the big problems there, and you and I have both spoken with Tony Heller about this, the problem has been that the Antonin Scalia decision had at the bottom of it, Well, of course, we know that no rights are not unattenuable.
	No right is absolute, as he said.
	And there's actually audio of him saying that.
	And we found out that there was some wheeling and dealing there so he could get the vote on the Heller decision to say, OK, I will go with you, Antonin Scalia, if you add that line in that no right is absolute.
	But that's the that's the principle of rights. That's the point. They are supposed to be absolute against the state.
	The state is not supposed to touch our rights.
	That's the point. So that's why they're called rights. And it's amazing to see how with the Bruin standard, there is this extra bulwark.
	But it seems like these people are aware of this extra bulwark now and they're just trying to take more of your time away.
	In some cases, they're doing it, I think, just because they don't like you.
	Well, I think there's a little bit of a problem here with the Congress that makes law, whether it's a state legislature or the federal government.
	And that is, they don't understand constitutional limitations.
	That is something that they've really got way off track on.
	Like I said, they've become drunk with power to the extent that they think everything is on the table for them to deal with and...
	Madison, the architect of the Constitution, wrote in the Federalist Papers, number 49, that this is where the whole concept of constitutional limitations takes place.
	And he explains that there are limits to the power of Congress.
	And in fact, the wording in this is so brilliantly written.
	I don't have it up on the screen.
	But he actually says that the Congress...
	The legislature comes from the blood of the people.
	It's the people that they live with, that they work with, that they farm with, that they do business with.
	Go to the state house or go to Capitol Hill.
	And they are the gatekeeper of our rights.
	And now the script has flipped.
	The coin has been tossed to the other side where they think that they are the grantor of rights.
	Where the original intent of Congress was to maintain and defend our rights.
	And unfortunately, now they see the, you know, like we can pick off little parts of it here and there.
	We can change the law.
	So you bring up an excellent point guard about this and what do they think?
	I was able to have a meeting at my shop with two state senators.
	And I did a big dog and pony show, told them about what gun owners go through, what hoops we have to jump through just to exercise our right to keep and bear arms in the state of Massachusetts.
	Then I finally said to them, I said, listen, if you could get the votes and you could pass a bill in the House on both sides, the reps and the senators, and say that we want to ban Catholics.
	If you had the votes, you had the numbers to pass it, can you do that?
	They both kind of looked at each other and said, no, we can't do that.
	So that is the first acknowledgement of constitutional limitations.
	And I was trying to show them the parallel.
	And I said, look, you just acknowledged you don't have the constitutional authority to ban Catholics.
	Right. But yet that's exactly what you're doing to guns.
	That's exactly what you're doing with the Second Amendment.
	And then they go, well, well, well, you know, and then start the whole no right is absolute and we can walk and chew gum at the same time and all this stuff that you hear them spout off.
	I said, no, it is the same because we have been told that Every gun infringement isn't an infringement on our constitutionally protected rights because you have other options.
	You just can't have that gun.
	You can have that gun if you want a shotgun, if you want a bolt-action rifle, if you want a non-high-capacity semi-automatic rifle, you can have that.
	You know, you have choices.
	We're not restricting your right to keep in bear arms because you have other choices.
	Well, I want to be a Catholic or fill in the blank.
	And if you pass a law saying I can't, guess what?
	You just acknowledged you can't do that.
	You're infringing on my right.
	And now that's exactly what you're doing to the Second Amendment.
	And you're saying it's not happening.
	You're saying you're not infringing upon my constitutionally protected rights.
	But oh, you are.
	Yeah, and isn't it interesting?
	We're speaking with Toby Leary of Cape Gunworks, folks.
	And, of course, follow Toby at Cape Gunworks on Twitter slash X. Go to the Cape Gunworks website.
	Isn't it interesting, Toby, as well?
	Because it's this...
	I think the first...
	Sign of trouble is that they are going to lay down their definitions of words.
	You know, it's like that Lewis Carroll thing from Alice Through the Looking Glass where she meets Humpty Dumpty and he is basically a cipher for a monarch.
	And she says, wow, you can make words mean so many different things.
	In other words, you know, it's propaganda.
	And he says, oh, she goes, how do you do that?
	And he goes, well, it's no, essentially he says it's no special skill.
	It just depends who's in control, you know?
	And so even when we look at things like the Bruin second tier standard, and you and I have discussed this a little bit before, that leaves ambiguity for the politicians to say, well, we will define what was common.
	Now, you could have enough pressure on people to say, look, you're being completely absurd and fatuous here.
	It's understandable what is common.
	But the very audacity, the usurpation of them to define for you the parameters under which they can attack you, that's a problem.
	You bring up a great point because after Heller, what makes it common and ordinary is the gun that the people want.
	It has nothing to do with what government's definition of common and ordinary is.
	I mean, the Supreme Court did sort of define that in the Caetano case, another Massachusetts case that talked about stun guns.
	And they said, there are 20,000 stun guns in common use in America.
	So therefore, they are in use or they're owned in America.
	So therefore, they are in common and ordinary use.
	A number of, say, 20,000.
	So that was enough to meet the definition of common and ordinary use for the Supreme Court.
	And you look at something like the AR-15, which is the gun that everybody loves to hate.
	And There's roughly 30 to 40 million of them in use in America each and every day.
	And so I think that meets the 20,000 threshold.
	But the bottom line is, it is the gun that the people want.
	And guess what gun that is?
	It's the gun that causes tyrants to question whether they should overstep their roles and violate their oath of office.
	And that is the one that makes tyrants nervous.
	So therefore they want to take it off the table.
	Well, the problem is that's the whole point of the Second Amendment.
	It is the tyrant relief valve that And you can't keep tyrants in check with your single shot shotguns, although I bet you could if enough people owned and possessed them.
	But the point is, it has to be equal to what government has.
	And if it isn't, then...
	you're missing the point.
	So, so right.
	Yeah.
	And, you know, Toby, just to wrap it up, I want to ask you real quick, but before I do that, ask you this question, I just want to mention some people might be familiar that in the 1990s, there was a new standard that was brought about in judicial tortious claim parlance called the Dauber hearing on class action suits.
	And it had to do with the introduction of expert witnesses for scientific background on various products or something like that.
	Previously, all they had was the judge would just determine, do you have an expert witness with enough credentials that we will allow this person in to be a witness for the plaintiffs or the defense in a tortious claim hearing, tortious liability suit.
	Then they changed it based on this Daubert to Judge Daubert, who came up with this new standard that the judge would not only determine whether the credentials were sufficient to allow this person into the court, which I think is already an arbitrary standard that is dependent on the judge, but also whether what the person was going to say was within, quote, the scientific consensus.
	And this goes to the common usage or the popular thing or common use of the time sort of thing.
	That leaves massive amounts of wiggle room for any person within a courtroom or any legislator to say, well, we're saying this is common.
	We're saying this is uncommon.
	So something new under the Daubert hearing.
	So, for example, the Dow Corning silicone breast implant lawsuits that were coming around in the 1990s.
	They had information that silicone was an adjuvant that caused women problems like lupus, but it wasn't well known at the time.
	So it wasn't the scientific consensus.
	It was new science that was revealing truth, but it had not been established long enough.
	They would have allowed the judge to block all of that scientific information, including information that Dow Corning knew in the 60s.
	That it was an adjuvant that caused autoimmune problems.
	So there's a great example of something new, which is totally viable and people should have the opportunity to find out about it in court or in the marketplace.
	Some new development of a firearm.
	Well, it's not in common use, so we can get rid of it.
	These are always these areas where you say to yourself, why did you put that in there?
	Why don't you just go with, shall not be infringed, it's a right, I recognize it, prima facie, and we're done.
	We can go home and have lunch.
	I don't get it.
	Tell us one real quick thing about what you're looking at in Massachusetts, Toby, because I know you're at work right now.
	So thank you so much again for joining the David Knight Show as I get to host it today, Toby.
	Of course. Yeah, so right now in Massachusetts, we have two bills.
	Well, it's really one bill.
	It's the House Bill H4139, which passed last November.
	And then the Senate passed an amendment to it called S2584. And Both iterations of these have had multiple numbers.
	It started life out as H House Docket 4420 and there were signs everywhere, you know, Stop HD 4420.
	And so it hasn't really morphed into the newest and latest number for signs and whatnot and for conversation purposes.
	But the bottom line is it's a really comprehensive gun, omnibus gun control bill that will severely restrict the right to keep and bear arms further than it already is in the state of Massachusetts.
	And interestingly enough, it is not going to do a dang thing about putting violent criminals in jail for long periods of time.
	All it does is level the sights of government guns at peaceful citizens if they don't comply with the new laws that are completely and utterly unconstitutional should they pass.
	So the two versions that have passed are vastly different versions.
	The House has completely rejected the Senate's version.
	So therefore, they are going to come together in a conference committee.
	And the conference committee has been seated.
	There are three senators and three reps that will now go behind closed doors and hash out the details of what the final version of the bill will be.
	There's no public input.
	There's no hearings.
	There's not even any other members of Congress that can go into these meetings.
	It is completely closed door.
	And they will come out and emerge with a bill that'll get an up or down vote, and then it'll go to the desk of Maura Healey.
	So, you know, our rights are under full attack right now, and they don't acknowledge that these laws are unconstitutional.
	I met with the senators that I met with, they think they're within their legal capacity or the oath of office to continue to further infringe peaceful lawful citizens' right to keep and bear arms. And I hope I gave them some food to think about, some things to think about.
	The good news is this is an election year. We have two massive issues that everybody has to campaign on. And one is them taking away our right to keep and bear arms by voting for this nonsense. And two is the illegal immigration crisis that is affecting just about every state in the union now.
	but it's costing Massachusetts billions of dollars, and we are a right-to-shelter state.
	I'm not trying to go down a tangent on that, but on the other hand, those are the two big issues that if people want to Get activated and call their congressman and call their state senator and say, hey, I'm not going to vote for you and I'll campaign against whoever primaries against you or I'll support whoever primaries against you and then I'll ultimately campaign for the person that opposes you on the general election.
	That would be a great place to start.
	Because they're all nervous about getting their job back in November.
	So I think that gives us a little bit of meat on the bone to go after.
	And, you know, at the end of the day, they don't care about your rights, guard.
	They care about getting reelected.
	So... That's so true.
	It's so true.
	And it's good that you're out there in the media and you've taken the time to talk to us.
	You speak with Grace and you take calls from people who are concerned about this.
	And if this legislation in Massachusetts does pass, then it would restrict a large number of guns that you could sell, likely.
	You're still waiting for the committee to come out with its final version.
	I know that earlier they had a portion of it that would have basically made it impossible for teenagers to train in firearms.
	Do you think that's going to be part of the final legislation as well?
	I don't know.
	It's really hard to say because the House is pretty much digging their heels in and sticking, you know, they're saying our version is the version. The Senate tried to make it a little better, if you will, or at least acknowledged that this is ridiculous. A lot of it is ridiculous and tried to get at the things that they actually want to pass like the unfinished frame and receivers. They want to ban those
	and make it illegal for people who enjoy the hobby of building firearms in their home.
	They want to do away with that.
	They want to further restrict semi-automatic rifles.
	So I think it's just a waste of breath to sit here and postulate on what the heck they could come out with.
	But whatever version of it is, it's not going to be good.
	And I'm really hoping that they just can't get along to the point where they run out of time.
	You know, July 31st is the end of the congressional session.
	However, they've seated the Congressional Committee here, and it's the first week of March.
	So I highly doubt that they're going to run out of time.
	And, you know, if I can back up on this whole thing, the bill that was originally introduced in July, HD 4420 by Michael Day of Stoneham, he introduced a bill that was the wish list of the Giffords, Everytown, Brady, Bloomberg, you know, mayors for whatever.
	It was a conglomerate wish list of, hey, if you make me a top 20 list of what you would like to see happen as it pertains to gun control, send me the list along with your check for my reelection.
	And that is what I'm going to put in.
	And that is exactly what happened.
	You know, there's a picture of Michael Day arm in arm with Gabby Giffords.
	You know, I'm sure she was hand delivering the reelection check and to his war chest.
	and then hand-delivered this pre-written bill.
	In my opinion, I don't have empirical evidence to this, but the only thing that leads me to believe that's the case is because when I called their offices and said, do you realize what's in this?
	They had no clue.
	They didn't know what was in it.
	So I know they didn't write it.
	And I know it was the wish list of the anti-gun movement.
	And that's exactly what they've implemented.
	So if you want to see... Your rights eroded in an unconstitutional fashion.
	Focus your sights on Massachusetts and what's going on.
	You can go to goal.org.
	They have done a full breakdown of it and my hat's off to them because I wouldn't have got through it the way they did.
	But they kind of bullet point all the major problems with these bills, with this bill.
	So, The good news is I have a sneaky suspicion we'll have a Supreme Court ruling in June that'll affect a couple of areas of this bill, so they might have to go back to the drawing board before it's even fully voted on and signed into law.
	I hope they would do that, have the integrity to do that, and not just pass it anyway and say, screw you guys, challenge it.
	But that's generally the MO, so my hopes aren't too high on that.
	But anyway, that's what we've been doing with shining the light of truth on the dirty dealings of our elected officials who think that our rights are something that they can take away, which they can't.
	And it's remarkable because they force you and other people to have to spend so much time to try to battle these things. But in a way, if we can look at the positive side of it, you are one of the best educated guys on this, on the courts, on the rulings, on the guns, the firearms, the history. And so in a way, you
	I can find a positive in that you are educating people.
	You're taking that time and getting the information out to the next generations, to people who maybe they'll come across your show, maybe they'll hear you on the radio, and they'll get that knowledge that they didn't have before.
	So because of the friction that they cause you, you radiate this heat of information out to people.
	It might sound like a platitude, but I think it is admirable what you do.
	I appreciate that. And, you know, just in closing, you bring up a great point.
	Without the infringement, we don't have the victory.
	So, you know, if it wasn't for District of Columbia banning handguns, we wouldn't have D.C. versus Heller.
	If it wasn't for the state of New York making some shall issue, I mean, may issue licensing scheme we wouldn't have Bruin.
	And after the Bruin decision came down, I said, I predicted exactly what's happening I said, it's going to get worse before it gets better.
	And I still feel that way.
	Well, Toby, thank you so much.
	It's great to see you.
	I want to show the website one more time and show your smiling face there in front of the golden mic, almost like the old EIB microphone.
	I'm so mad at my producer for buying this microphone.
	I'm like, who do you think I am?
	I don't deserve a golden microphone.
	I've been at this for two years.
	I do a once-a-week podcast.
	But anyway...
	That's good. It's good.
	I mean, you could go with copper, copper rounds or lead, but I don't think that would work.
	It'd be too insulating. The gold all the way, man, all the way.
	It is classic. It's great stuff.
	And Toby, thanks again.
	And I hope people check out Rapid Fire.
	Again, they can check out capegunworks.com to find out more and then follow you on Twitter.
	It's at Cape Gun Works, right, man?
	Yes, sir. Thank you very much, Gard.
	I appreciate your time. You are the man.
	And again, I hope I can get down there to see you very soon, man.
	I'm going to be interested in maybe making a purchase, but definitely going on to the range and finding some advice from you, okay?
	That'd be great. Come on down anytime.
	All right. Thanks, Toby. Great.
	We'll talk to you soon. Thank you for the time.
	Appreciate it. Boy, Toby Leary, good, good man.
	I like him a lot. And of course, go to capegunworks.com, everybody, to find out what he does.
	He is a decent, decent man.
	And if you get the opportunity, check out his show.
	I think you'll really enjoy what he does.
	And you can find all the old versions of the show at the website.
	So definitely take the opportunity.
	You know, I want to show you a little something from...
	The Governor of New York, before we bring in our next guest, Gerald Cilente, at 11 o'clock.
	And you'll see over on my Twitter feed that I made a comment about this.
	So here it is.
	This is from yesterday. And I discussed this on my program yesterday because it does have to do with safety.
	The state of New York trying to block people's ability to defend themselves, and what is called the tragedy of the commons, where the government claims control of something, in this case the subway system in New York City, Whether it's a public street or the subway system, this is a public place. People's tax money is used for it.
	They have the right to self-defense.
	And, of course, Kathy Hochul has said she's declaring martial law by sending 1,000.
	This is Joe Haas dementia.
	No kidding. That's his site.
	So he's saying she's declaring martial law.
	But essentially what she's doing is she's going to send a thousand National Guardsmen to patrol the crime-ridden subway.
	So here's what she had to say.
	I've got a shorter clip of it, but I want to show you the full clip of the 39 seconds.
	National Guard to conduct point one.
	I'm redeploying nearly 1,000 members of the New York State Police, MTA Police, and MTA National Guard to conduct bag checks In the city's busiest transits, they'll start seeing them at the tables, making sure that weapons are not being brought in,
	working in concert with our New York State Police, as well as our NYPD. Because no one heading to their job or to visit family or to go to a doctor appointment should worry that the person sitting next to them possesses a deadly weapon.
	Point one. Thuggish police force that is going to infringe on your rights.
	So I brought up a little something.
	People who are familiar with the problems of the central government running the so-called immigration system, although the word immigration is not in the U.S. Constitution, especially if they live in New Mexico or Arizona, they might be familiar with these public places where their rights have been infringed, otherwise known as border checkpoints.
	This way. Sir, I need you to answer my immigration question.
	I didn't go out of country.
	Sir, under INA 28783 and Supreme Court, U.S. versus Martinez-Fuerte, this is an immigration checkpoint.
	I didn't go. I didn't leave the country.
	I wanted to establish if you're a U.S. citizen.
	But I didn't leave the country. I know, but this is an immigration checkpoint.
	I need you to answer my immigration.
	That's fine. I need to be satisfied.
	Well, thank you. You're a U.S. citizen.
	I'm just traveling on this road, so.
	It's a simple question, sir.
	I don't answer questions. And, of course, they pull them aside.
	They pull people out of the cars.
	And I read last night on my Liberty Conspiracy program, which, of course, you can listen to, watch, Monday through Friday at 6 o'clock on Rumble, Rockfin, and on my Twitter feed, that is XFeed, at Guard Goldsmith.
	I mentioned this from the Future Freedom Foundation's President Jacob Hornberger, The Tyranny of Domestic Highway Checkpoints.
	The imposition.
	Of Kathy Hochul inside the subway system is no different than the folks at the TSA who are in your airports.
	They're supposed to be state or municipal airports.
	The federal government's not supposed to have anything to do with it.
	They started the FAA back in the 1920s as part of the United States Postal System.
	They had lighted air routes before radar.
	And they blocked off air routes to commercial flyers so that the U.S. Postal Service could fly.
	And they claimed that they were similar to post roads that the Constitution allows the federal government to create.
	The post roads, right?
	Well, from there, of course, with different federal handouts to specially favored mayors or governors, people like Illinois governor or Chicago mayor, they would start to hand out money for the building of airports.
	The FAA grew.
	And by the way, as I mentioned, if you want to see the vestige of the origins of the US Postal Lighted Air Routes, Postal Routes, if you're flying over areas in the Southwest, you can still see in the daytime they had giant concrete arrows for the pilots.
	They didn't have radar.
	And at night, they had giant light towers, some of which I could still see when I was a kid.
	You could see them going east, west, north, south, that sort of thing.
	So the pilots would follow those.
	From there, they expanded.
	There's nothing in the Constitution that truly allows in any pure reading of the Interstate Commerce Clause the politicians to say that because a plane flies over state borders, the government can regulate it.
	The Interstate Commerce Clause was originally written in order to allow for some sort of remedy between state on state trade disputes.
	States with capital S's, the governments.
	Not people putting things that they want to sell over state borders for sale.
	But they have misconstrued it, of course, contrary to even what James Madison said.
	said. He said it was a remedial measure, not a priority measure, allowing the government or ex ante, allowing the government to regulate anything that they want and tell people what they've got to do in order to engage in free commerce, freedom of association.
	There should be no TSA. It's a breach of the Fourth Amendment on a daily, regular basis.
	And Hochul's move in New York and the subway is the same thing.
	Now, some people might think it provides great security.
	This goes deeper into the philosophy, therefore, of the tragedy of the commons.
	Because anything the government runs is going to pit people against each other.
	And it just causes dissension and fraying of people's nerves and argumentation.
	The government is not a positive.
	It's not the great uniter.
	It's the great forcer.
	So I think that that's important to remember, especially when we look at the infringement of the Fourth Amendment in some of those states and the borders, where even in the Constitution, the word immigration does not appear.
	As I've mentioned previously on David Knight's show here and on my program, and you can look it up, it was an 1875 Supreme Court ruling that basically created out of nowhere the congressional power to control immigration.
	Up to that point, it was a state issue.
	Thomas Jefferson mentioned it in the fourth Kentucky Resolution, and James Madison mentioned it in the Virginia Resolves.
	It's very important that people keep this stuff in mind, because if they call themselves, say, conservative constitutionalists, at least try to be consistent, at least have a conversation about these things, because you're at...
	Adoration of central command and control is not getting you what you want, either for so-called gun control or security in the subways or your roads or your ability to control the border.
	Look who's in charge of it now.
	Let's take the opportunity to hear a little bit from our next guest.
	I want to... Let you know a little bit more about the David Knight Show and where you can find it.
	And then we'll be right back with Gerald Salente on the David Knight Program.
	If you like the Eagles, the cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSRadio.com.
	... We're
	so
	making sense common again You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Oh, again, wonderful stuff.
	And now let's hear from a wonderful man.
	He is Gerald Salente, and he is joining us from Kingston, New York.
	Gerald, welcome to The David Knight Show as I get to fill in.
	Thank you so much.
	Really appreciate you being here, of course, coming from the headquarters of the Trends Journal.
	Welcome to the show and happy Friday.
	Thank you.
	It's not a happy Friday.
	I'm so sad.
	You're not rolling in the splendor of the State of the Onion address, or is it a little too stinky?
	You know, it's just a lot of more crap, you know.
	I'm so heartbroken to see the decline of this country.
	You know, I'm a real jazz fan, you know, but, you know, going back from ragtime to swing to...
	Right. I remember we got to talk a little bit about that because my dad, he brought me up with that, listening to Gene Krupa on the drums and great stuff.
	And I'm listening to some Southern music, the hillbilly music and stuff.
	And the spirit of America was so high.
	And everybody's having a good time and laughing.
	Yeah, things were tough, but you went out and had a good time.
	And now there's no good times.
	I'm up here in the Hudson Valley.
	How about Death Valley?
	There's no nightlife anymore.
	I mean, everything is a drag.
	It's such a beautiful area, too.
	It could be so vibrant, but everybody's opportunities have been crushed through so many vectors.
	It's ridiculous. Again, they've sucked the joy out of life.
	And you talked about the moronic speech yesterday.
	Of course, I didn't. Oh, he was on fire.
	A little goddamn clown.
	A little boy of nothing.
	A little jerk.
	One after another. I can't stand either of them.
	I want to make this really clear.
	You know, I'm a political atheist.
	I don't believe in the, quote, system.
	I was the assistant to the Secretary of the New York State Senate.
	I ran major political campaigns in Westchester County, the richest county in America.
	I designed and instructed American politics and campaign technology, how to run political campaigns, taught it at St.
	John's University. I've been in a system.
	I got out. It was a freak show.
	Little boys and girls that bend over and suck up to get their way up.
	Little bunch of nobodies.
	And that's what this country's become.
	I'm little Andy Cuomo.
	I'm a daddy's boy of nothing.
	Born on third base.
	Thought I hit a home run like little slimeball Georgie Bush.
	Little true dope up there in Canada.
	Shut down your business.
	Stand six seat apart.
	Only 10 people are allowed to come in your house.
	Heil Hitler! Yes, sir!
	And then they've got the audacity to talk about freedom.
	You know, Trudeau did it just again a couple times this week, and Biden did it last night.
	Right off the bat... Trying to conflate the United States perpetuating that meat grinder in Ukraine to somehow, somehow, Gerald, freedom.
	Amazing. By the way, Gerald, I want to mention before we go on any further, I know that I mentioned about, you know, chatting for a half hour, but if you can stay longer, I would love it, you know, because I wasn't sure how long you want to go.
	You can only do a half hour.
	Okay, sounds good.
	Sounds good. Let's discuss a couple of the things as we compare Joe Biden claiming the economy is doing great and, of course, violent crime is down, completely contrary to reality.
	Over at Trends Journal, I want to show some folks what you've got here.
	And you've got some very important things.
	For example, the trend about the EV, that is an excellent, excellent piece.
	And how soon until banks can offer crypto custody services to clients.
	Plus, of course, what you have, you have a very good piece about a couple banks recently that are dealing with business properties and And they are in a lot of trouble.
	So take your pick to tell us what you would like to really flag for people to watch.
	And they can find this at the Trends Journal.
	And of course, if they use David Knight code, David Knight Show, they get 10% off, if I'm not mistaken.
	Yeah, that's true. And again, it costs by $2.50 a week.
	A lousy cup of coffee.
	And again, look at our top trends.
	We're going to talk about it. One of our top trends, this is going to be a golden year for gold.
	Oh yeah, guess what? As we go on the air now, gold is what?
	$2,175 an ounce.
	When we wrote this, it was about $1,900.
	Right. Yeah. And what is another one we're going to talk about?
	Banks go bust.
	When they lock down, and again, talking about crime and stupidity, All this money going into the military-industrial complex, our country rotting in front of our eyes.
	The subways in New York is a night in Calcutta.
	A little clown girl playing a governor in New York.
	Again, men, women, boys, girls, black, white, green, yellow.
	Don't want to hear the crap. Good and bad comes in everything.
	There's a little jerky guy running this huckleberry.
	We're going to send National Guard to the subway system.
	Again, putting things together, the banks going bust.
	Nobody talks about the reason why this crime went up was because of all the years of lockdowns.
	And what we said, when people lose everything and have nothing left to lose, they lose it.
	Let's go back to the office building bust.
	Again, this is the data.
	Your office vacancy rate in New York City, meaning nobody in the buildings, only about, it's 22.8%, 23%.
	23% vacant.
	Your office occupancy rate in New York City, 49.7%.
	Wait a minute.
	You mean only 49%?
	50% of the people are going back?
	That's right. And you've got 23% of the buildings are vacant?
	Yeah. How about all the businesses that used to depend on commuters?
	How the hell with them? Who cares?
	Again, now the office building bust, which we warned back in May of 2020 in your Trends Journal.
	We said there's going to be an office building bust that's going to bring down the banking system.
	Yeah. Screw you.
	What are you talking about? You don't know anything.
	You're not on mainstream media anymore.
	Used to be on everybody.
	Oprah a couple of times.
	Used to be on CNN four times a month.
	I used to be on everybody. Good Morning America, The Today Show, on and on and on and on.
	We don't want you there because you speak the truth and you won't swallow the crap that they're putting out there.
	So let's go back to the banking system.
	Let's say I own...
	I have 10 stories in a building.
	My people don't want to come back to work anymore.
	After they're staying home, week after week, month after month, year after year, they're saying to themselves, holy Christ, I'm getting up at 5 o'clock in the morning, commute an hour and a half?
	I'm not going to do that anymore.
	I can't believe I was destroying my life like this, sitting behind a car like this and bumping a bump in traffic.
	Okay. I got to, yeah, listen, stay home.
	They were in cubicles anyway.
	I'm the boss. I don't see these people.
	Why do I need all this space?
	Now you're going to see default rates, and you're seeing with this New York bank already, and it's one after another.
	There are about, according to the Federal Reserve, about 60 banks suffering from strict defaults coming up.
	They're hardly mentioning this at all.
	You've got to really, really, really do it.
	Again, Go to the wall, I can't say the word, but it's S-H-I with a T in it, journal, because that's what it is now.
	There's no data on what was the German manufacturing index?
	What did it came out? Yes. Oh, you mean it was way down again?
	Or how about what? No data anymore.
	No data anymore.
	Yeah, that's a good point. Gerald, you've got a piece here that I flagged.
	Last night over dinner, I was looking at this, and I just want to show it to people in the Trends Journal.
	This is the headline, Top Trend Office Building Bust from March 5th, Pension Funds Fund dumps office.
	And this is a little bit of what you mentioned.
	This refers to this.
	And this is the solid solidity of the information that you provide for people who really want facts on the ground that they can deal with and try to prepare and make some decisions about their money.
	As you say, the Wall Street Journal, it's so difficult to even look at it in many cases.
	Every once in a while, they'll have something in an editorial or something.
	But You say here the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board.
	CPIB was one of the earliest pension funds to put money into commercial real estate, inspiring others around the world to do the same.
	Now, the board has sparked worries that other retirement systems will follow its lead in dumping its holdings in office buildings at deep discount prices.
	If that becomes a trend, it will drive down property values across the sector even faster than they're falling currently.
	In one instance, the CPIB, Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board, sold its interest in a New York City office development project for a dollar.
	Yes, a single dollar just to escape probable future losses.
	It sold its share to Boston Properties, another partner in the deal, which also agreed to assume the board's debt from the project.
	And there's so much more here, but there's something down a little further.
	You say... Banks and investment funds around the world have thrown money into office blocks for decades.
	Now, many are conceding that a significant portion of those loans may fail, Fortune reported.
	More than $100 billion in commercial real estate loans are maturing this year, and $1.1 trillion worldwide will come due before 2028.
	And then if you go to our economic update in this week's Trends Journal, we have, this is reported that, quote, the delinquency rate for office buildings in New York City has increased, you ready? By more than 1,000%.
	From January 2023 to January 2024, according to data from CoStar.
	A thousand percent.
	Hey, did Taylor Swift have sex last night?
	I mean, that's the kind of news that is news.
	We won't talk about it.
	Unbelievable. Wow.
	Well, you know, Gerald, you've mentioned before your experience at 9-11, the things that people need in order to be prepared.
	One of the things before we get to the physical stuff is this information.
	And I know you've been making great strides, you know, every week your conversations with Judge Napolitano, and you've been on a lot of programs talking to a lot of people.
	Are you getting a sense, Gerald Salente, that you're getting more access to more people recently in a sort of this growing nascent Expansion of the independent reporters and people doing podcasts and things like that?
	Yes and no.
	We're getting shadow banned on YouTube.
	You see the hate mail I get and people contacting YouTube.
	They're calling me an anti-Semite and I hate Jewish people.
	Yeah. Because you see the cover of this week's Trends Journal.
	Yeah, well, of course.
	If you're at all in favor of a ceasefire, then clearly you're anti-Semitic.
	I mean, don't people understand this?
	And my last name is Goldsmith.
	A lot of people think I'm Jewish.
	And I've mentioned this before on my own program, Gerald.
	I went to Boston University, right?
	And just to let you know what this is like, my roommate...
	For two years was one of the reporters.
	His name is Sean Naylor.
	He's one of the reporters who exposed that the CIA was spying on Julian Assange in the Ecuadorian embassy.
	So we've always been pretty pro-liberty guys.
	So I have an English-Irish name, right?
	I often mention on St.
	day, I get in front of a mirror and I yell at myself for my own rebellion and British oppression. But they thought I was Jewish. And I would hear things from the Zionist Jewish people. And there were other people who were very religiously inclined and so on. But the way that they would describe the Palestinian people, it blew me away then. They were just like animals. I couldn't believe it.
	And if I at all criticized them, it was the gaslighting.
	It was the, what are you, anti-Semitic?
	I thought you were Jewish.
	Like, what are you talking?
	I'm talking about a political system of oppression that has been growing decade after decade, taking people's land.
	I thought that was bad when it was done to the Jews in Germany and Poland.
	What are you talking about?
	It's just insane. And it's this mindset on hyperdrive now.
	You can't say anything.
	It's nuts. Yeah, so again, you know, we say what we say.
	We have no advertisements in the Trends Journal.
	And again, it's only like, if you get it from the night, it's only about $2.50 a week.
	So anyway, yes, I have a lot of, but we're getting the hate mail that I'm getting.
	Again, I launched Occupy Peace over a decade ago.
	I'm not anti-American because I hate America's wars.
	I'm not anti-Jewish because I hate Israel's genocide of the Palestinians.
	And if you look up the definition of genocide, it's exactly what they're doing.
	Isn't it amazing, Gerald, to see these transparent, these shallow bottom feeders in Washington, D.C. and others like Victoria Nuland, like people like Joe Biden, or people like Amy Klobuchar, or people like Lindsey Graham, on the one hand, claiming that they've got to support Israel.
	At the same time, every one of those people associated, and as I mentioned before earlier on the program, with Ole Tjanibok and the members of the Sloboda Party in Ukraine as they overthrew the elected leader, Yanukovych, in late 2013, early 2014, and worked with Nazis to put in Yatsenyuk and worked with Ole Tjanibok and the Sloboda Party.
	And then allowed for the systematic destruction of tens of thousands of people in the Donbass region with those Nazi Azov battalion people.
	And they've got the fatuous gall to talk about how they support Jewish people.
	While they're, on the other hand, hanging out with Nazis in Ukraine.
	It's... It's like, don't you, do they ever think that people might notice this stuff?
	They don't care. They don't care about people.
	By the way, what you're saying, hardly anybody knows.
	Here, this is the cover of the Trends Journal going back to 2014.
	See how happy that guy is?
	It's about the United States overthrow of the democratically elected government, the Viktor Yanukovych.
	There you go. Ms.
	Facha Brut, what's her name there?
	or Janet Yellen.
	Yeah.
	Ukraine presented the perfect opportunity for Washington to advance in such a monic agenda in a speech to the national press called last December, which was 2013.
	Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland boasted that Washington had invested $5 billion in NGOs, non-governmental organizations in Ukraine.
	To quote, teach democracy.
	Stealing $5 billion of our money to give to the crime syndicates to overthrow this government.
	Are you kidding me? To teach democracy?
	Yeah. Holy smoke!
	But that's what America does, don't you understand?
	We attack Vietnam.
	We attack Iraq.
	We attack Afghanistan to bring freedom and democracy.
	Absolutely. Just unbelievable.
	It's unbelievable. Guys, we're marching off.
	We're marching off to big democracy.
	Oh, it's unbelievable. It's, you know, I was joking around.
	I was sitting around about, you know, the Barack Obama-Dick Lugar visit to Ukraine in around 2005-2006 when they got up.
	Bioweapons started with some billions that they provided over there, the bioweapons labs, that Victoria Nuland admitted to Marco Rubio a couple years ago.
	And she said, well, they're research facilities.
	And she used the term Ukrainians.
	It was just ridiculous. Actually, finally admitting it.
	I was joking around about Barack Obama at that time.
	Going in there and shaving off some money and giving those guys easy-bake ovens for their lab stuff to cook up some of these chemicals.
	But the thing that really got me was around 2013, I was reporting on this coup.
	And a buddy of mine, and I mentioned this on my show, the Liberty Conspiracies show that I do in the evenings...
	A buddy of mine had worked for the Obama administration under Eric Holder very briefly.
	And he got out just before.
	Yeah. And I had gone to school with this guy, high school with this guy.
	You know, we went to punk rock clubs together and stuff like that.
	He was more on the left wing side.
	He got out before the Fast and Furious stuff blew up.
	And so I knew it was like, oh, you must have heard about that.
	He comes up to me December of 2013.
	He says, hey, guard, where are you getting your information?
	I'm listening to your podcast about Ukraine.
	Where do you get that information? And I have been sort of tipped off to the United States trying to overthrow Syria and so on and so forth.
	So I've been watching this.
	And then when the Russians dropped their long-term debt holdings for the U.S. around 2008, 2009, I was like, that was when they started to try to show isolations and try to block Russian energy exports.
	It was very clear what they were doing, right?
	Right. And so I said, well, you know, I'm just getting my information and, you know, talking about Yanukovych, the false flag of the snipers and stuff.
	And I said, well, you're right.
	And there's a lot more.
	And I said, oh, really?
	Like what? And this is December.
	They haven't, you know, they haven't even installed the new government there yet or anything like that.
	And he said, there's a lot more.
	And I said, like what? So then he paused.
	And I mentioned to my audience, I don't know whether he was just playing up the drama, but he said, You know, I think I better stop there.
	I have a daughter now.
	So I said, all right, man, whatever you want to do, dude, whatever you want to do, but I'm going to keep reporting on this stuff.
	And he has decoupled from me.
	I haven't heard from him since a few months after that.
	Again, you know, it's a crime syndicate that people call a government.
	I mean, here we are, we got a choice between Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck.
	I mean, we got only two parties run the whole country.
	I mean, what's a joke?
	And look at these little boys that you mentioned, little Lindsey Graham, Rubio.
	These little boys couldn't fight their way out of a paper bag.
	Anybody that wants to support a war overseas, go over there and fight.
	Send your wife, your kids, your transgenders, go over there and fight.
	Send your money or shut your mouth.
	I want my money to stay in America.
	Occupy Peace, the movement that I launched, One of the major elements of the platform, close all the bases overseas.
	We've got over 800 in about 80, 90 countries.
	Secure the homeland with the troops.
	Put our money to rebuilding our rotted third world infrastructure.
	Anybody, you want to go to war, let the people vote.
	Those are the platforms.
	Again, so going back to talking about the war, going back to the economy, with Biden, 63% of the American people are living paycheck to paycheck.
	The cost, 38% Of people's income, 38% is going into the cost for rentals.
	Meanwhile, the bigs keep getting bigger.
	Going back to immigration, they could stop it from coming in.
	Very simple. They don't want it to.
	They need more cheap labor.
	Go to Walmart.
	I don't go to any of them.
	Go to Home Depot because they need hardware stuff.
	And again, when I was a young guy, they had hardware stores, stationary stores, drug stores, grocery stores.
	Now it's stationary chains, drug chains, grocery chains, hardware chains.
	They're all chains.
	Go to any of them.
	Help Wanted. Help Wanted.
	Help Wanted. Because they pay the plantation workers of Slavelandia nothing.
	They want all the cheap labor they could get in this country.
	So going back to the reality, when Clinton ran for office, another slimeball murderous little clown, the backstage in the campaign, the slogan was, it's the economy, stupid. That's what the people care about the most.
	And going back to the clown Biden's speech last night, that's what they're going to keep doing.
	So let's go back.
	Gold prices are going way up as we had forecast.
	The reason they're going up too, number one, The lower interest rates go, the deeper the dollar falls and the higher gold prices go because gold is dollar-based.
	So as the dollar goes down, it's cheaper for other countries to buy gold.
	And by the way, China splurged on gold for 16 straight months.
	And the People's Bank bought about almost 400 troy ounces of gold last month.
	400,000.
	All right? Wow.
	And it's one bank after another.
	The number of central banks buying combined total around a thousand tons a year.
	And this is according to the head of Stonex Financial Limited.
	So, reason number two.
	World War III has begun.
	It's not going to become official until there's a major event that happens that, oh my God, like a 9-11, like the bombing of Pearl Harbor.
	It was going on before that.
	So there's going to be, look what happened when three people were killed, three, you know, on the Jordan-Syrian border in America, bombs away over Syria and Iraq.
	So when it's going to happen, there's going to be a major false flag event or something that's going to make World War III official.
	And they're going to do it in the Middle East with the United States, Israel, going after Iran.
	When that happens, you're going to see oil prices spike to above $130 a barrel.
	That's going to crash the equity markets and the global economy.
	Going back to gold.
	Those dominoes fall so easily.
	And then going back to gold, yes.
	Focusing on that is so key.
	So you've got the geopolitical and the real economic.
	We were talking about the banks go bust.
	The people are suffering now.
	The people on Main Street feel it.
	It doesn't become a reality until Wall Street goes down.
	Then the people feel it as the real pain.
	And again, you're looking now.
	The data just came out.
	The unemployment rate is almost 4% now.
	Actually, it's much higher.
	Absolutely. The official rate now is 3.9%.
	And again, you look at Challenger and Gray came out with an article yesterday that the layoffs are the highest rate since 2000.
	Here we go. I'm not making it up.
	Layoffs rise to the highest rate since For any February, you ready?
	Since 2009.
	That's the height of the Great Recession.
	Wow. And again, we had forecast.
	I took out the domain name, the Panic of 08 in 2007.
	So we're going to go to a...
	So going back to gold...
	Gold, number one, I'm very bullish on Bitcoin, not because I like it, hate it.
	It's because the people don't understand what's going on.
	You have an inflation rate in Argentina, for example, of about 250%.
	People can't buy gold.
	So what they're doing is they're watching their currency go down the crapper, Turkey, one after another, with inflation in Turkey's wide, about 68%.
	They're buying Bitcoin.
	You're buying like a tiny bit, a tiny bit, a tiny bit.
	So that's going to keep driving the prices up.
	So I'm bullish on Bitcoin, gold, and silver is a longer shot.
	And again, we don't give financial advice.
	We're saying what we see and why.
	And so that's how we see this unfolding.
	It's extremely important and people can see what has been happening to gold recently.
	It's the inevitable consequence of a central banking system that is funding a massively indebted nation state that continues to try to play on people's political funny bones and rub their backs and scratch under their chins.
	It's got to stop.
	People need to recognize it, or at least prepare.
	And, you know, I really admire this cover, if I might again show it, Gerald.
	Hate Israeli genocide?
	You're an anti-Semite.
	Because I agree with you, and I think that their target is Iran.
	They want to take out Iran, and they also want to overthrow Assad in Syria.
	As long as it takes them, they'll try to wipe him out.
	And... I worry very, very greatly that the United States government and various NGOs might be working to try to bring in certain immigrant factions that they already know they've got here and will be ready to do something that will be depicted as anti-Semitic activities, like trying to take out a Jewish synagogue or something like that.
	Oh my God, if a Jewish synagogue went, you could blow up all the mosques you want in Gaza.
	But don't touch a synagogue.
	Yeah. Yeah. Unbelievable.
	And it just blows me away that at the same time that Joe Biden and his fatuous gang of creeps can sit there and say, well, we need to make sure Israel has a right to exist.
	First of all, philosophically, no state has any stinking rights.
	They're states. They're abstract entities.
	They're not human beings. Second of all, if you want to send a check to Israel, Mr.
	Biden, you go ahead and do so.
	Leave my neighbor out of it.
	And I don't quite understand how it is they can talk about democracy and freedom and things like that, as those poor people there have been told, oh, go to, say, Khan Younis, and then they bomb Khan Younis.
	Go to this hospital. It's unbelievable. Week after week, day after day, everything the Israeli government says has been shown to have been a lie or not substantiated with any real proof.
	And yet they continue to lie.
	Stopping at that about a lie, about all the Jewish women that were raped by Hamas.
	Yes, exactly. Max Blumenthal and Aaron Monte did a great job exposing that stuff.
	Max Blumenthal, a Jewish guy?
	Why that anti-Semite? Oh, and Norman Finkelstein brings out the truth.
	Why that anti-Semite?
	Oh, and Joe Biden says, I'm a Zionist?
	Mm-hmm. Go over there.
	Oh, Joe Biden.
	Joe Biden is about three and a half years older than me.
	He got five draft affirmants during the Vietnam War.
	Five! A little fat mouth that loves war.
	Five draft affirmants.
	Same with Trump. Trump got over $100 million from Sheldon Adelson.
	And Braggs, I've done more for Israel than any other president.
	Oh, and I moved the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, and I said to Israel, yeah, the land you stole from Syria and the Golan Heights, it's yours.
	Who the hell are these people representing?
	Oh, and Israel, how many times have I heard this one?
	Israel has the right to defend themselves.
	Nobody else does.
	Nobody else does.
	Now, Israel has no right to exist.
	And here are the facts.
	And if anybody, anybody could deny these facts, let me know.
	Here's your Trends Journal going back to 2006.
	Crusades 2000.
	You ready? Yeah.
	Regardless of what England's reasons or intentions were, self-serving or otherwise, Crusades 2000 was set in motion by the 1917 Balfour Declaration that laid the foundation for Israel, quote, His Majesty's government...
	Wait, stop. Wait.
	His Majesty's government? Some murderous slimeball from the UK? Yeah, that's right.
	His Majesty's government views with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.
	Hey, wait a minute. Who the hell is he to say what should be going on in Palestine to say it's a national home for the Jewish people?
	Well... I guess he got the money from the Rothschild gang, didn't he?
	Oh, those are the facts. Yes.
	Yeah. Go on.
	It goes on.
	And will use its best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this objective.
	You stole the land from the Palestinians.
	You got the money from the Rothschild gang to do it.
	They're an occupying force.
	No occupying force has any right to claim that they are defending themselves.
	And of course, any of those soldiers on those grounds, if they're using weapons, those weapons were gotten through taxation.
	I love this This ridiculous canard that they try to sell people that a nation state has a right to defend itself.
	Ergo, therefore, we are going to force you.
	You can't defend yourself against Joe Biden.
	You've got to cough up the money to blast apart more Palestinian people in Gaza.
	That's their logic.
	It's disgusting.
	And to show you the more disgusting, this is from Aharetz.
	Not reported in one, not one major newspaper in America.
	This is the 6th.
	What was that? Wednesday. Israel approves construction of 3,476 housing units in West Bank settlements.
	You mean stolen land in violation of the Geneva Convention and Article 242 of the United Nations?
	They're not settlements. They're stolen land.
	But we'll call it settlements, just like we say Israel has the right to defend itself.
	And not reported at all.
	Israel could steal all the land that they want.
	Oh, and you see the number that came out?
	About 30 of the Palestinians that they arrested recently died in jail.
	Yeah, and they don't call those hostages.
	They have held hundreds of people every year in Israel without trial, extrajudicial, some of them teenage kids.
	And women.
	Yeah, and women, absolutely.
	And so if people were to use the logic that Israel can go in and wipe out civilians so they can get their hostages back, well, the Palestinian and the Hamas authorities could use the same logic to say we can go into Israel because you every year have held hundreds of people without trial.
	You're holding them in a corral, for God's sake.
	Yeah, this is that little boy, Anthony Blinken.
	This is right after, this is October 12th, a couple of days after Hamas attack, which I'm totally opposed to the Hamas attack.
	Quote, talking to Netanyahu, I come before you not only as the United States Secretary of State, but also as a Jew.
	How about you come here as an American?
	I could care less what religion you believe in.
	Unbelievable. Yeah.
	Unbelievable. And of course for him.
	How about coming to you as American?
	I could care less what religion you believe in.
	But don't you tell me that you're the chosen people and God gave you this land.
	Shove it. And they're sucking your lifeblood.
	And again, I'll bring it back to Kingston.
	I know it's a massive left-wing enclave there.
	Some of these people accept their own domestication.
	It's just sad.
	And I don't know what...
	Hopefully, you'll stick around there.
	It's a beautiful area. And hopefully, I'll be able to visit you again.
	I got to go down there when David was speaking and so on and meet you.
	It was great. And I really hope that I get the opportunity to do that.
	I know you're planning something for the fall coming up, Gerald?
	Yeah, we're going to have, I may even have an earlier Occupy piece.
	We're going to try to do as many as we can.
	I got to run, but I want to read this quickly.
	Yeah. I'm an American.
	And I stand by what the founding fathers fought for.
	This is George Washington's farewell address.
	A real man that fought, a real general, not like that little betrayed us guy, that Petraeus that's not working for KKK. Not that guy, who the troops surge in Afghanistan.
	Not Lloyd Austin, not him who couldn't fight his way out of a paper bag, all that weight they don't make a paper bag big enough.
	This is a real man that fought, George Washington.
	Quote, It is our true policy, this is his farewell address, to steer clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign world.
	Observe good faith and justice toward all nations.
	Cultivate peace and harmony with all.
	The nation which indulges toward another and habitual hatred Like we've been taught since I'm a kid hiding under a desk in case an atom bomb went off, hating Russia.
	The nation which indulges toward an habitual hatred or an habitual fondness, like we love Israel, is in some degree a slave.
	It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection.
	Either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and interests.
	A passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils.
	Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no common interest exists, and the infusion into one The enmities of the other betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels of wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification.
	Right there.
	Right there that not one, not one of these slimeball politicians speak about or respect.
	Gerald, you say it beautifully.
	Bring it into history. And of course, Trends Journal, the subhead for Trends Journal, is history before it happens.
	And you work so hard.
	I'll let you get back to it, Gerald.
	And thank you for joining me as I filled in for David today.
	It's always great to hear from you.
	You are just such a great guy.
	And I hope I get to see you down there in Kingston again very, very soon.
	People can check out Trends Journal.
	They can check out your show with Judge Napolitano.
	And how do they want to follow you on Twitter slash X? Yeah, Gerald Salenti, and same with Trends Journal, YouTube, or Trends Journal.
	And thank you for what you're doing.
	The information and knowledge that you have is, you know, it's not many people saying and doing what you're doing.
	Of course, David is, and a number of us.
	Thank you so much. I mean, you know the facts and the information.
	And that's all that counts, so the facts, not what people believe in.
	Again, I'm a political atheist.
	You know, I was doing a show and I pulled this out over here.
	Let me try to find it.
	Yeah, here. Love blooms on the campaign trail.
	That was my former wife. May she rest in peace.
	So when I say to you I was at the top in the political world, it's not a bunch of BS. You know, the facts are there.
	And when I quit, nobody could believe I was quitting.
	I said, I'm not going to do this. I'm not going to be a little slave to these clowns.
	What a good move. And that's all they are.
	It's a clown show.
	It's a presidential reality show.
	So thank you so much for what you're doing.
	Thanks, Gerald. We'll talk to you again.
	Trends Journal. Check it out, everybody.
	It's trendsjournal.com.
	Gerald Salenti, you're not only a gentleman, you're a finely attired gentleman.
	Your sartorial taste is amazing, and so are your principles.
	Appreciate it very much, Gerald.
	Thanks so much. Thank you very much.
	You got it. You got it. Gerald Salenti, everybody.
	What a good guy. And, of course, Gerald Salenti.
	You can get the Trends General for 10% off if you use the code KNIGHT from The David Knight Show.
	Elvis. Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles.
	And the sweet sounds of Motown.
	Find them on the oldies channel at aps radio.com
	Oh Oh You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Oh, yes, indeed.
	Great stuff from The David Knight Show.
	What great music. And great comments from people also.
	I want to turn to the Rumble chat and thank you all.
	And also, I want to mention that those of you who have been watching over on Twitter slash X, I greatly appreciate it.
	I had an interesting comment in there from Paul.
	A number of comments from Paul on Twitter slash X. And Paul, welcome.
	You said Gerald Salentes from Yonkers.
	Nuns almost beat him deaf when he was in elementary school.
	Yes, that's an amazing story.
	And he went to high school with Son of Sam.
	I didn't know that.
	Not to be, you know, terrible stuff there.
	But it would be interesting to talk to him about that.
	And over in, let's see, over in Rockfinland, Little John is there.
	Carlos Rex is there as well.
	And thank you for the contribution.
	We have some contributions from Mark Crawford.
	And appreciate that, Mark.
	And anybody who wants to do the same, you can do that at Rockfin or at Rumble.
	Please feel free. And don't forget, David Knight also has a subscribe star, which is really useful.
	And you can check him out over there.
	And Dougalug says, thank you, Gerald.
	And thank you, Doug.
	Appreciate it. And Carlos Rex has a wonderful statement here.
	The federal government is neurotic fascist psychopaths.
	Yep. Yep, absolutely.
	And, you know, it's interesting how there are various ways that they can get people to accept Psychopathic behavior, or I would call it sociopathic.
	The state is, by definition, sociopathic.
	So the There is a difference between the state and society.
	Society is the set of arrangements and traditions and developments that we put together through free association and voluntary contract and work with each other through our free will.
	That is society. And philosophers through the ages have understood this.
	The state is that which is imposed on us.
	And when I say state, I mean in the generic normative sense, not in the state as in the state of New Hampshire or differentiating it from other states.
	I mean the state in the generic political sense.
	So the state is imposed on us.
	It is imposed on people.
	And the only way it can exist is through imposition.
	If it were all voluntary, then it would be free association.
	An agreement, a business contract, something like that.
	So by definition, if the state is there in front of you, some form of coercion has taken place and more coercion will take place for it to continue to exist.
	So the state, by definition, must draw from society in order to exist.
	Therefore, everything the state does is a detriment to the decisions made within society because not all of what you want to do in society can actually be allowed.
	And some of your earnings will be drawn from you to fund the state.
	So the state is parasitic off society and blocks society.
	The state is sociopathic.
	It is pathological towards society.
	By definition, it's inarguable.
	It's just a simple logic syllogism.
	So, logical syllogism.
	So, the...
	You know, I discussed this on Liberty Conspiracy.
	And if you want to watch, it's 6 p.m.
	Monday through Friday on Rumble and Rockpen.
	And we get into this...
	I tried to put this sort of together as best as I can for students.
	I taught at a charter school for a while.
	I was a little too radical for them.
	But if I'm doing lectures or anything like that in front of students, I try to lay these things out with these parameters.
	And you can't escape these things.
	It's sort of like people are talking about Elon Musk and X and the fact that he...
	Might shadow ban or decrease the visibility of people who intentionally so-called misgender or don't use the pronouns that someone wants to use, someone wants them to use for them.
	Well, you know, look, there's reality.
	I had a student one time say, oh, no, you can use they for a single person.
	So I said, okay, if you think you can use they for a single person, let me give you a couple quick examples.
	In television, oftentimes they will use the garbage pronoun they for one person because they don't want to say whether it was a man or a woman.
	People often fall into that trap.
	They don't use proper grammar.
	They're not precise.
	They don't use their words properly.
	I understand sometimes in conversation things slip by, you get accustomed to things, but it's good to stand up once in a while.
	It's good to try to maintain a standard, right?
	So I said, so for example, Channel 9, WMUR here in New Hampshire, it's the only ABC, only network affiliate.
	They might report, hypothetically, the Manchester Police or Goffstown Police have apprehended the suspect, the suspect, in a series of arsons.
	They will be arraigned on Tuesday.
	Okay, so they don't want to say whether it's a man or woman.
	Rather than saying he or she, we don't know the identity of the person, they say they.
	Well, how many people were arrested?
	One. You've got to have specifics.
	If you're a cop, and we've already seen this stuff, they're starting to do this now in California.
	Well, we've got to describe somebody in very oblique terms.
	Well, that's going to make it a lot easier to find your suspect, isn't it, Dunderhead?
	Right? I mean, come on.
	Seriously? Have some respect for yourself, for goodness sake.
	And then, how about respect for others, primarily?
	That would be nice. And then I said, look, to this student, I said, look, if you work in an emergency room, you don't use they for one person.
	And you want to know, is it male or female who's being brought in in the ambulance?
	You don't go to dispatch and hear they because that means you're going to prepare more than one room for the incoming emergency.
	You want to know, male or female, because that has an effect on your choices of things for possible problems for a potential victim coming in in an emergency.
	There are variations.
	There are biological truths.
	We can't get around these things, right?
	So it's just absurd and it demeans oneself to not stand up for truth.
	And we're only here for a certain period of time.
	Why not stand for truth?
	That would be nice. I'll leave you with this.
	We talked with Toby Leary about the bump stock story, and I could give you the information from my MRCTV video recently, but I just want to reaffirm some of the information, that being on the bump stock case in the Supreme Court.
	You can check it out. I'll show it again tonight on my Liberty Conspiracy show tonight.
	I think it's about 10 minutes long, so we might go over time on David's show today.
	But I want to just reiterate a couple things that I mentioned so that you have the information in front of you.
	And feel free if you want to drop comments into the chat.
	And again, feel free if you want to donate at Rumble or Rockfin to David's program.
	That would be great. Everything will go to David and Travis and the whole team.
	David's not sick or anything like that.
	They're just taking some time off.
	And I will be here again on Thursday next week, as police squad would say.
	As, of course, people take some time off for the holidays and things like that.
	So here is this story that I mentioned.
	U.S. has approved 100 arms deals for Israel since October 7th to support Gaza slaughter.
	They were secret arms deals.
	The Biden administration has secretly approved more than 100 separate foreign military sales to Israel since October 7th to support the mass killing of Palestinians in Gaza, the Washington Post reported Wednesday.
	So at least there is that use for the Washington Post.
	It's unclear how many of the sales are being funded by the U.S., but many could be, as Israel receives $3.3 billion in annual foreign military financing.
	They could be a form of U.S. military aid that gives foreign governments money to purchase U.S. arms.
	Only two sales have been made public.
	Isn't this great? Yeah, it's land of the free.
	Yeah, self-governance.
	Yeah, you try to govern yourself sometimes, see what happens.
	Say, no, I'd rather keep my money.
	Only two sales have been made public, one for $106 million worth of 120 millimeter tank ammunition, you know, from these people who want to control guns, as Joe Biden said, he's going to stop those large capacity firearms.
	Oh, really, Joe? Is that true?
	What do you describe as large capacity?
	Where do you get the moral authority to do that?
	Even if you amended the Constitution, I didn't sign it.
	I'm not part of your deal.
	That's why I'm a volunteerist.
	I have rights.
	And just by people ganging up saying, oh, we can take your stuff, or signing a piece of paper and saying, oh, we amended this thing.
	At least they could go with their promises to abide by the Constitution.
	I don't promise that.
	But at least they could go with that.
	Personally, I'd prefer the Articles of Confederation or I'd rather have the Brehon Law System that was very close to an anarchic system or the Viking Goddard system.
	Sort of a tribal sort of a thing.
	Only two sales have been made public, $106 million worth of 120mm tank ammunition, and one for $147.5 million in components needed to make 155mm artillery shells.
	U.S. officials told The Post that there was no public debate for the other 100 deals because the dollar value fell under the threshold needed to inform Congress.
	Ah, you know, that's always good stuff.
	How about that declaration of war thing?
	Oh, no, we can use the term authorization to use military force.
	No, you can't.
	But did you even bother doing that?
	No, we didn't do that either this time.
	Good, thanks. You want to use any other terms like frisbee that's not in the Constitution?
	And here is this one from, of all things Bloomberg.
	U.S. weighs tapping army funds for Ukraine as aid bill stalls.
	They would target roughly $200 million in, you got it, reserve funds.
	And Biden's $61 billion request remains tied up in Congress.
	So that was one of the reasons why Biden had invited...
	Vladimir Zelensky's wife to attend and also Navalny's wife to attend but neither of them attended the State of the Onion last night because it was part of his agenda the agenda cooked up by other people like Blinken and others to push more weapons to Ukraine.
	What I think is pretty darn cool is that Thomas Massey invited Julian Assange's brother To attend.
	Last night. And he sat in front of Joe Biden.
	That's pretty cool.
	Just going to check my notes out.
	Make sure that I covered everything that I was hoping to cover for you today.
	And I will welcome you if you are interested.
	Join us tonight on Liberty Conspiracy.
	And of course check out David's channel.
	Every Monday through Friday.
	Starting at 9 a.m.
	On Rumble and Rockfin, DLive, you can get the audios, you can get the podcasts.
	A lot of great information coming from him and it will help us fight people like her and people like him and her and him.
	Let's head over into the chat to round things off and I want to welcome everybody once more.
	Thank you so much for being there Harbs.
	Tony Arterburn of the Arterburn Radio and of course America Unplugged of Paratrooper and Wise Wolf Gold and Silver based in Missouri and Texas.
	I see Harps is there from Australia.
	Thanks, Harps. I was talking about the late 1990s, mid-1990s, after the Port Arthur massacre, the Australian so-called gun by, and how violent crime actually didn't go down until years later.
	And yet people claim that it went down, which is completely counter to facts.
	And Dougalug says, Happy Friday, all.
	Thank you, Guard. Good show.
	Thank you. Thank you so much, you all.
	I really appreciate that.
	And Jason Barker, thank you for being there and doing what you do over at the Foxhole and Knights of the Storm.
	They'll be on tomorrow, folks, 10 a.m.
	for Knights of the Storm. Over at Rumble, I want to thank Flying Axe Blade for being there.
	And I appreciate you being there as well.
	And he says, it's not some other overreach of power indicative of future totalitarianism.
	We already have that.
	Yeah. And I see that Dragon Greta is there.
	They have filled our country with enemies.
	And... Bull Dag, D-A-A-G-G, says Trump left Assange hanging.
	Yes, and don't forget that officials during the Trump administration...
	Pompeo plotted to kill Assange.
	That would be Pompeo.
	I have video of Pompeo dancing with IDF soldiers while the IDF soldiers outside of their little dancing area in Israel were blasting apart Palestinian people and taking their land.
	Because they care.
	They care so much.
	Sorry, that sounds pretty preachy.
	So look, thank you so much everybody for being here.
	Thank you for being kindred spirits.
	Remember to watch David's show Monday through Friday, 9 a.m.
	Be here. Be here live if you can't and you can watch it.
	Share the video after the fact.
	Give it the thumbs up. Spread the word.
	And also, please watch us on Liberty Conspiracy Monday through Friday at 6 p.m.
	David Knight at 9 a.m.
	I'm on at 6 p.m.
	Monday through Friday. We'll be rolling it tonight.
	And, of course, you can find Liberty Conspiracy and my sub stack.
	Go to the Gardner Goldsmith sub stack.
	You want to follow me on Twitter. It's at Gard Goldsmith, G-A-R-D. And Liberty Conspiracy, just look for it on Rumble and Rockfin.
	And thank you, everyone, for being such good people.
	Really appreciate it. And thank you to Travis and David and everyone.
	Watch for David Monday.
	Spread the shows over the weekend.
	Great insight. The segments are on Twitter and on Gab and on Rockfin and Rumble.
	You'll find great stuff from David's show.
	Thanks, everyone. Take care.
	As the prisoner says, be seeing you.
	The common man.
	The common man.
	It's time.
	you They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

▲