Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 5, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:55

The David Knight Show - 02/05/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds You're listening to The David Night Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 5th of February, year of our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to begin with the expanding war in the Middle East.
	They're pushing very hard to try to get a war with Iran.
	This is what Lindsey Graham, Nikki Haley, military-industrial complex establishment has always wanted.
	They're pushing very, very hard.
	Lots of strikes this weekend.
	And as we look at that...
	NATO is showing just how weak and unprepared it is.
	We also have, in addition to the war, we have what looks like the collapse of the petrodollar, isn't it?
	That alliance with Saudi Arabia.
	Saudi Arabia has now joined the BRICS. We're going to talk also about enhanced games.
	This is sent by Jason Barker.
	Very interesting what the elites want to do.
	And I think he's absolutely right.
	I think it's pushing transhumanism and other body modifications.
	We'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	Well, again, I think the top story is war.
	Bye.
	And again, if you want to understand why Gerald Slenty has been so upset, so angry all the time, it's because he's seen this coming for a very long time.
	Multiple fronts. I said back in the 2020 election, I said, so you want to know the difference between Biden and Trump?
	If it's Biden, it'll be war with Russia.
	If it's Trump, it'll be war with China.
	If we're unlucky, we'll get both.
	Well, it looks like we may also get a Middle East war as well.
	How's that for World War III? Beginning with three different wars.
	The U.S. plans weeks-long bombing campaign against Iranian targets.
	Because Iran is projecting power into the area.
	They want to be in the same places that we've invaded with our forces.
	Iraq, Syria, those types of places.
	And again, when you look at this attack as it's presented by the mainstream media, it's a Jordan drone attack.
	It's right on the border between Jordan and Syria.
	And of course, right over the border, there is another military base.
	Which one was it? Does it make much of a difference if it's on one side or the other?
	As a matter of fact, the Jordanian government said no, it was on the Syrian side.
	You got two bases on either side of the Jordanian-Syrian border, both by the U.S. And why are we there?
	As we look at this, and I talk to people who are Trump supporters, and I have a lot of friends, basically, who are Trump supporters, friends from church who don't listen to this program, things like that.
	And so they believe that Trump is going to bring peace.
	He's going to control the borders.
	He's not interested in a war in Europe or a war in the Middle East.
	I wonder what gave them that impression.
	You know, if you go back and you look at his history, what makes you think?
	That is the case at all.
	But, you know, Trump didn't end a single war.
	He said he was going to, and they'll say, well, Trump didn't start a war.
	Well, actually, he escalated the war in Syria.
	Now, we're going to take the oil.
	We're going to put people further inside.
	And until this recent thing that happened at the border, and again, the question is whether it happened, you know, across this borderline, imaginary line, Multiple U.S. bases there.
	They're all there about the oil and about Syria.
	We invaded Syria.
	We invaded Syria.
	And we're there in Syria to steal the oil.
	And in the past, nobody asked that question.
	When U.S. forces get attacked in Syria, what are we doing there?
	Who authorized that?
	You've got some Republican congressmen now saying, well, if Biden wants to start a war with Iran, Maybe we will, Thomas Massey said, well, I'll file impeachment because that's what Biden said back in 2007, said if Bush starts a war with Syria, I'm sorry, with Iran, we will, because it's okay to start wars with other countries, I guess.
	But draw the line there with Iran.
	If he starts a war with Iran, then Biden said in 2007, I'll file articles to impeach him.
	And so Massey posted that video and said, well, here's your warning about that.
	But this is, Trump did not stop any of the seven wars of Obama.
	He escalated them. He escalated the war in Syria.
	And he talks about the contrast between Biden administration's desire to build up Ukraine and to give them more money versus what he's doing at the border.
	And he starts talking about NATO. And yet, he didn't cut funding to NATO. What he did was, by talking about cutting funding to NATO, the European countries added funding to NATO. Kind of an interesting way for the deep state to prepare for war with Russia.
	Well, we're not building up because we're going to go to war with Ukraine.
	We're building up because Trump has said he's going to cut funding if we don't build up.
	Isn't that always interesting?
	It's always about the money.
	Have you noticed that? I can't get people to understand that.
	I can't get people to understand it's always about the bribery.
	You know, if you lock everybody down, if you force your medical staff to get a vaccine, I'll give you money.
	But if you don't give them the vaccine, I'll cut all your Medicaid and Medicare funding.
	That's the way Biden did it.
	Now, Trump had bribed them, said...
	If you point to somebody, you don't have to have a PCR nonsense and all the rest of the stuff.
	Maybe just point to somebody, do a clinical diagnosis.
	They've got COVID. I know it.
	You're sniffling, you're coughing, you got COVID. And everybody believed that.
	Don't you remember in 2020?
	If you're out in public and you sneezed or something, everybody would look at you like, oh, you know, you were pariah.
	I remember that happening. Happened to me.
	Happened to me when I was with Karen.
	She sneezed. Everybody's looking around, you know.
	It's amazing.
	And so, you know, just point a finger at somebody and say they got COVID. Boom.
	You get a 20% bonus on everything you do to them in the hospital, plus a cash bonus of $13,000.
	That was a Trump approach. Biden said, I'll take all that away.
	Plus, I'll take away all of your Medicare, Medicaid, if you don't vaccinate your nurses.
	You see, Biden didn't do mandates.
	He did blackmail.
	He did blackmail and incentives, bribes and incentives, the same stuff that Trump was doing.
	It's just that most people don't pay any attention when it's done by their guy.
	They don't care. You know, the conservatives who would have a problem with it, If it had been done by Hillary, they didn't have a problem with it when it was done by Trump.
	Anyway, getting back to the escalation of the Middle East war, the U.S. is considering targeting Iranians in Iraq, Syria, and or the Iranian Navy.
	And again, when we look at this monster, Iran, where did it come from?
	There's no better example of CIA blowback than Iran.
	You know, that's Ron Paul's term.
	Let's talk about when we go into a country and we overthrow the government and we put in our guy because we didn't like the other guy.
	He was going to nationalize some of the oil industries there.
	And, you know, war is a racket, as Smedley Butler pointed out.
	We're there to defend the economic interests of big corporations, whether it's a fruit company in a banana republic or it's an oil company in the Middle East.
	That's what we're there for. You know, blood for money.
	And so the guy that was elected in the 1950s, they didn't like him.
	He was going to nationalize some of these industries.
	So they threw him out and they put him in the Shah of Iran.
	Then they trained his secret police.
	That would be incredibly repressive to surveil people, to kidnap them and torture them if they are political opponents.
	That's the CIA training that.
	Now, all of those tactics are coming home, aren't they?
	All of them are coming home.
	They haven't started the domestic torture yet, unless you count January the 6th, which you probably should.
	But that's our CIA. So the CIA created the Shah of Iran.
	They were there for a couple of decades, created so much hatred and animosity that they refer to the United States as the great Satan.
	Israel is just the little Satan.
	We're the great Satan because of the CIA. And they're right.
	The CIA is Satan's minions.
	If ever there was an organization, that's okay.
	Forget about the Masons and all the other stuff.
	It's the CIA you need to focus on, folks.
	It's the CIA that has the power.
	Forget about the Illuminati and the Freemasons.
	They're child's play compared to the CIA. You know, they're junior league, minor league.
	They're pal football, if you will, compared to the CIA. They're the satanic organization at the heart of the global governance.
	And they're the ones who created this monster in Iran and the blowback of the Ayatollah and the Islamic Republic.
	And so now they're going to use that to create a much broader war.
	Could provide a full-blown war between the U.S. and Iran, writes antiwar.com.
	Even though the Pentagon admitted it has no evidence, Iran has directly involved in the drone attack in Jordan.
	Well, we don't know if it's Iran, but let's go after them anyway.
	The U.S. says that Iran is responsible only because it arms one of the branches of Hezbollah and other Shia militias.
	U.S. officials told the New York Times that while Iran arms and funds the Shia militias, there is no evidence that Tehran is calling the shots.
	Those are U.S. officials telling that to the New York Times, but they want a war anyway.
	So I said, this is why Gerald Slenty is always so upset.
	He's seen this for a long time coming.
	This is just, it's slowly unfolding.
	And he sees it. And he can't get anybody to wake up about this.
	So, the Islamic resistance has taken credit for many of the 160 attacks that have been launched against U.S. forces in Iraq and Syria since mid-October.
	What are we doing in Iraq and Syria, anyway?
	Why are we in Syria?
	Why are we still in Iraq?
	Why don't we come home? Wasn't that what Reagan did when the Marines were attacked in Beirut?
	Killed 200 Marines? He said, this place is crazy.
	We'll never sort this out.
	They'll never have peace. They'll be at each other's throats.
	Why are we going to get in here in the middle of it, either as a referee or jumping in on one side or the other of this?
	The rational thing would be to come home, but we're not going to do the rational thing because we have people who want war.
	The more war, the better. And so 160 attacks, not all of them coming from these Shia militias, but the U.S. coalition over the weekend is starting to even up the score.
	We got 40 just over the weekend.
	We've had 160 since the Hamas attack October 7th.
	And now we've got 40 just in one weekend, and it's going to really explode.
	It is just, we're on the cusp of it right now.
	U.S. conducts self-defense strikes against deeply buried hooty targets.
	This is the headline from The Daily Caller.
	Self-defense. Don't talk to me about self-defense when you've got the border wide open.
	Wide open. You're not interested in defending this country.
	This is no self-defense.
	You don't invade another country and then when they attack you, call it self-defense.
	This is the conservative press.
	This is the Daily Caller.
	This is Tucker Carlson's old, you know, this old site.
	Self-defense.
	They want us there.
	They want us there as self-defense.
	But they leave the border wide open to destroy this country from inside out.
	And the conservative press, the MAGA press, the Trump press, is right there along with them.
	So, Massey, as I said before, hints that impeaching Biden...
	If he goes to war with Iran, to do what other Republicans want to do.
	We've got Lindsey Graham, as I said, but a lot of Democrats as well.
	Here's the clip that was posted by Thomas Massey.
	This is Biden in 2007.
	Saying that if George W. Bush went to war with Iran, without congressional approval, as required by the Constitution, that he'd vote to impeach him.
	How many wars have we had since then?
	You know, first of all, with Obama, they expanded the number of wars.
	And he did it without ever declaring that.
	Biden didn't have a problem with that.
	Now Biden is on the cusp of doing yet another.
	And I want to make it clear.
	And I made it clear to the president.
	That if he takes his nation to war in Iran without congressional approval, I will make it my business to impeach him.
	None of them are anti-war.
	They're playing political games with you.
	Democrats and Republicans just playing political games.
	None of this stuff is serious.
	And so Massey said in 2007, Biden put the president on notice.
	He would impeach him for going to war with Iran without congressional approval.
	Consider this to be your notice, Biden.
	And so another comment that he made at the time that has resurfaced.
	On January the 6th, 2020, as a matter of fact, here's the tweet that he put out.
	He says, this is January the 6th.
	Most people didn't pay any attention to this.
	He put out this tweet in the midst of what was going on at the Capitol.
	This went out at 2.30 in the afternoon.
	All that stuff in January the 6th happened right after this show ended around noon, started happening.
	So this is well into that.
	And I remember because I told everybody that morning, I said, stay away, stay away.
	It's a trap. There's going to be all kinds of agent provocateurs there.
	They're going to trap you, and they're going to set up a narrative to attack all conservatives.
	Stay away. I got fired trying to warn people what a grift it was and what a trap it was.
	But while that was happening, Joe Biden tweeted out that afternoon at 2.30 p.m., January the 6th, 2020.
	I'm sorry. I'm off a year.
	I'm off a year. That was 2021.
	But still, interesting that it was one year exactly, wasn't it?
	So he says, let's be clear, Donald Trump does not have the authority to take us into war with Iran without congressional approval.
	Again, this is a point, not when the insurrection was happening, but he was running for president, just like in 2007.
	So when you're a candidate, you want to talk about peace, even though you don't mean it, as we can see with all of them.
	Obama did it. Biden did it when he was running for president.
	Trump did it when he was running for president.
	Let's end the wars. They know what people want.
	They just won't deliver it.
	Trump does not have the authority to take us into war with Iran without congressional approval.
	A president should never take this nation to war without the informed consent of the American people.
	And without doing it in a way that obeys the Constitution.
	But of course... Neither Trump nor Biden cares a flip about the Constitution, as we saw the medical martial law and all the rest of this stuff.
	So why did he put that out?
	That was a few days after Trump killed the Iranian general Soleimani by a drone strike in Baghdad.
	So that's why he said, you don't have the authority to take us to war.
	That's an act of war.
	It is. So much for the peaceful Trump, right?
	Assassinating, essentially, their George Washington as the way they regarded him.
	So, then, you know, when you look at what is happening at our border that they don't want to defend, Here is Biden talking about the border, and actually, I don't have that in the deck, Travis.
	See if you've got the Biden border deck there.
	As he's talking about how you must have a border to defend the country.
	You got it? Go ahead and roll it.
	It makes sense. That no great nation can be in a position where they can't control their borders.
	This is when he's running for president in 2008.
	Not just for immigration, but it matters for drugs, terror, a whole range of other things.
	So, that's the first sort of truism.
	The second truism is that this nation Is such that people in the country should have the first opportunity to be able to have jobs that pay well and have jobs that are decent.
	Okay, so this is when he's running in 2007 for president.
	The second crack goes to what we may need.
	Pause it a second, Travis.
	If you can, can you leave that screen up there and pause it?
	Yeah, thank you. So now, look at this.
	Okay, the conservative comment here as they put this up.
	So they take this clip from C-SPAN. And then they put up in the corner there as he's talking about the importance of the border.
	They say, illegal immigrant encounters under Obama, 5 million.
	Under Trump, 4.7 million.
	Under Biden, 12 million.
	Now, this is the way you can use statistics, right?
	How long was Obama president?
	Eight years. How long was Trump president?
	Four years. So if you want a consistent comparison, the real trend would be Obama, 5 million.
	Trump, 9.4 million in four years.
	Well, made out to be eight years, right?
	And then Obama in just four years, 12 million.
	It's going up exponentially for sure.
	But it went up exponentially from Obama to Trump at a rate over an eight-year period that would have been double what Obama had coming through there.
	So they're all talking about peace.
	They're all talking about the border when they're running as a candidate.
	And then when they get elected, they do nothing or do exactly the opposite.
	You don't secure the border.
	You don't build the wall.
	As a matter of fact, you put more troops into some locations.
	And you establish as a precedent the executive order from the previous president is what Trump did.
	It was Obama's executive order saying we're not going to enforce arrivals of childhood arrivals, the DACA thing.
	Trump could have gotten rid of that.
	Instead, he pretended that he didn't have the authority.
	He pretended that he couldn't get anything done at the border because he was being blocked by the Congress.
	And yet now the Congress is all saying, Biden can do what he wants.
	So he doesn't have to wait for us.
	He's president. He can do what he wants.
	They all play this game.
	They'll tell you the truth about the other guy.
	They'll tell you the other guy is starting wars.
	They're telling you the other guy doesn't have the authority to start a war.
	They'll tell you the other guy does have the authority to protect our border.
	But then when their guy is in, they pretend they don't have the authority.
	And so Trump did nothing about DACA. He kicked it to the Supreme Court and actually did nothing about it.
	So I'll let them tell me what to do.
	I don't want to take responsibility for that.
	So it's just campaign politics, folks, but it is a war.
	It is escalating. And I don't think that's going to be a difference between the two of them.
	When you look at NATO, NATO, with all of its blustering, is writing checks that it can't cash.
	You want to talk about the money stuff?
	These guys are strutting around like peacocks, and they don't have a military that is in line.
	Mechanical issues doom one of the two UK aircraft carriers ahead of a massive NATO war drill.
	The HMS Queen Elizabeth experienced an issue with a faulty propeller shaft.
	And so they took it out of the war games.
	And they brought in their second one.
	They've only got two.
	The U.S., by the way, has 11 aircraft carriers.
	China has two.
	Russia has one from 1985 that's shaky.
	But I don't really think that aircraft carriers are going to be all that important.
	When you look at how the drones are in operation, as a matter of fact, Russia is always...
	It was interesting when I interviewed Alexander Dugan, the Russian nationalist, and he talked about the great sea powers.
	The UK, the US, and I guess you could say that's transferred to the US now.
	The UK's got one and a half aircraft carriers.
	But he said he saw Russia as a big land power.
	And that's always been the problem of people who underestimate Russia.
	People like Napoleon.
	People like Hitler. People like Biden.
	Underestimating Russia.
	But I think they're also underestimating the changes in technology.
	You know, they look at these very sophisticated pieces of technology and...
	It's hard to tell what's going to be the dominating force in the next war Everybody thought the battleships were the key thing and they had been key prior to World War two but when they took out almost all the battleships of the US at Pearl Harbor The thing that saved the Navy was the fact that the aircraft carriers were out at sea and that was the real issue As a matter of fact, it was aircraft carriers that enabled the Japanese to do Pearl Harbor.
	And that was the real projection of power.
	But now when you look at when the war comes home, when the war comes home, these very primitive drones, they've got a Ukrainian drone, for example.
	Going deep into Russian territory and destroying one of its largest oil refineries.
	Because you don't need to have much to blow up an oil refinery.
	Once you get that started, it just keeps going.
	It's a chain reaction. And they were able to go 360 miles with a suicide drone attack.
	This is another example of a new form of asymmetric war.
	And it's something these types of attacks on infrastructure...
	Infrastructure attacks done by drones, and when you look at talking about self-defense for this country, you're going to leave the border wide open, southern border wide open, and provoke all of this at a time when it's very easy for somebody to do something with a drone to attack our infrastructure.
	It is suicidal and it is traitorous what is being done by the people in power.
	And I say that of both parties and of both Biden and Trump.
	Michael Tracy has put out a thing about Trump and calling his bluff on the war stuff.
	He says Trump finally elaborates on his Ukraine position.
	He says he'll get the European countries to match what the U.S. is sending to Ukraine.
	And we've seen this before.
	Now, as he put that out, And you also had RFK Jr.
	pick up on this same video clip.
	Jack Posobiec attacked RFK Jr., said he was taking it out of context.
	No, he wasn't, actually.
	It's interesting to me that he went after RFK Jr.
	rather than going after Michael Tracy, because Michael Tracy puts it in full context.
	Not just the full context of his speech, but the full context of Trump's four years as president.
	That's the context, Jack.
	Trump finally elaborates on his Ukraine position.
	He says he'll get the European countries to match what the U.S. is sending in Ukraine.
	Bolton and other war pundits are going around warning that Trump will abandon Ukraine and withdraw from NATO. And they did the exact same thing in 2016 when he was running.
	And then when Trump became president, what did he do?
	Exactly the opposite.
	And Michael Tracy nails it.
	He says they perpetually need a fantasy version of Trump.
	To fuel their angry obsessions.
	And it's not really their, well, he said angsty, angsty obsession.
	It's not angst, it's not anger.
	It's political.
	They know exactly what they're doing.
	They know what they're doing when they charge Trump with all this ridiculous lawfare.
	All these non-crimes that they're charging him with.
	And letting him go for the really serious crimes because they did the serious crimes as well.
	Same things as they spread the poison around and made people inject it through coercion and bribery and blackmail.
	And so they're not talking about that.
	But they want to portray Trump, a fantasy version of Trump, as somebody who stands with America, puts America first.
	Wants peace. Wants a closed border.
	That's not who President Trump was.
	So now we're back to eight years ago.
	And we're supposed to forget everything that Trump did in four years.
	And we've got a fantasy version of Trump that's being sold by the Democrats.
	And a fantasy version of Trump that's being sold by the MAGA press.
	And it's necessary for both of them.
	It's necessary for Trump To be persecuted, he thrives on it.
	He baits the judges. He wants more of it.
	He gets millions of dollars of donations whenever he gets his mug shot out there.
	And they know it.
	The Democrats know it.
	And they're pushing Trump forward.
	They believe they can beat Trump.
	And, of course, nobody in MAGA believes that Trump can lose.
	So when Trump loses, as far as they're concerned, it's time for civil war.
	Let's get it on. That's the danger of all this.
	Just as James Carville said when they were talking about impeaching Biden, he says, good, good.
	How did we get so lucky that they'd impeach Biden?
	It's going to energize our base.
	It's going to get us contributions.
	Same thing. They know that.
	That's what they're doing to Trump.
	They want Trump.
	So Michael Tracy says, in their fantasy, Trump really will abandon Ukraine and withdraw from NATO. Despite four years in power of doing exactly the opposite and bragging about doing exactly the opposite, even today.
	In the Vegas speech, Trump also says that he's the only candidate who will prevent World War III, a smart political line, because as you saw with Joe Biden in 2007, and then even again when he's running in 2020, I don't want war.
	It's the other guy who wants war.
	In this 2024 campaign, Trump has made virtually zero tangible policy commitments on war-related issues, or any other issues as well.
	He's not pressed to do so either by the butt-kissing conservative media or by corporate media who just want to endlessly whine about January the 6th and Russiagate.
	It's just a belief in the necessity of his own restoration to power.
	That is running this. So here's the clip, and then I'll tell you what Jack Posovia tried to say about it.
	So here's Trump talking about war.
	And you know, Ukraine's an interesting case.
	People always want to know my feeling.
	Number one, we're in for 200 billion plus.
	And the European nations are in for 20 billion.
	And it's more important for them.
	And don't you think they should equalize?
	Nobody asks them.
	It's like I did with NATO. I said, we're spending, we're paying for NATO. And we don't get so much out of it.
	And you know, I hate to tell you this about NATO. If we ever needed their help, let's say we were attacked, I don't believe they'd be there.
	I don't believe. I know the people.
	I know them. I can tell you country by country who would be there and who.
	But I don't believe they'd be there.
	But I took care of NATO. I said, you got to pay your bills.
	If you don't pay your bills, we're not going to be there to support you.
	And the following day, the money came rolling into NATO. But the European nations, if you add them up, the economy is about the same size as the U.S. Believe it or not, a lot of people are surprised.
	You add them all up. And they are in for about $20 billion and we're in for $200 billion because we're stupid.
	All we have to do is say pay.
	Nobody ever says to them pay.
	You don't even hear that.
	I say pay. And they'll pay too.
	You have to equalize. Okay, so he's not really concerned about the war.
	As long as they pay their way, let's have the war.
	Let's get it on. He didn't say anything about stopping the war.
	And of course, he didn't stop any of the funding to NATO. We're stupid.
	We're paying 10 times as much.
	We're in for $200 billion.
	They're in for $20 billion. But he didn't change that when he was president, right?
	So what's he complaining about?
	He did nothing. Instead, as he talks about that, this is a perfect example of how they use Trump, how the globalists use Trump.
	As he talks about that, they upped their ante, and of course, that's what they needed in order to attack Ukraine.
	They knew what they were going to do.
	And he kind of laid the groundwork.
	He set the table for that by talking about, well, I'm going to get out of NATO if you guys don't spend more money.
	Okay, they spent more money. Now we can go after, you know, with Russia even further.
	Now, Jack Posobiec, It says, RFK falsely claims Trump wants to extend Ukraine war based on an edited clip about the Biden border bill negotiations.
	Now, he played, he said, here's the full clip for context.
	This is post-millennial.
	That's his publication.
	So he plays the full thing for context.
	Well, the context was that they're talking about money for the border and money for Ukraine.
	Speaker Johnson comes in and said, well, you want more money for Ukraine?
	All right, you're going to have to put some money at the border.
	And this is the same type of stuff we saw when Reagan blew up the budget.
	You vote for my pet project, I'll vote for your pet project.
	But even with that, Biden doesn't want to spend any money on our border, even to get money for Ukraine.
	And so that was the context.
	He was complaining about that aspect of it.
	But you heard what he had to say.
	He's not opposed, in principle, to the war.
	He's not opposed, in principle, to NATO. And in practice, he did nothing to get us out of NATO. He knows that NATO is not our ally, but we still give ten times as much money to these people.
	As they put into the common defense, and they're not going to be there for us?
	What Trump said in that clip is self-indicting, quite frankly.
	There's no excuse for it.
	I think it's worse than what Michael Tracy or RFK Jr.
	had to say. But Jack Posobiec is somebody who's always worked for the military-industrial complex, the right wing of the intelligence community.
	That's who he is.
	He's another Steve Pachenik.
	He's a young version of Steve Pachenik.
	Don't trust this guy.
	He's another Trump apologist who doesn't want you to pay attention to what Trump did and what he did not do.
	He calls it a deceptively edited clip.
	No. He was contrasting Ukraine spinning with border spinning, but Trump didn't do anything to close the border either.
	And he built up NATO for this.
	He didn't pull it back from the brink.
	So, he also goes on to say, Trump slowed the border crossings to a crawl.
	No, he didn't. He didn't build a wall.
	Why do you think we've got this and immediately had it as soon as Biden took over?
	They start talking about it at that point in time.
	They didn't want to talk about it when it was happening under Trump.
	Everybody went silent.
	Because the MAGA media didn't want to talk about the open border.
	And the mainstream media doesn't have a problem with an open border.
	So nobody was talking about it.
	Everybody thought the problem had been solved, perhaps.
	Because there wasn't a lot of chatter about it.
	But the border was wide open.
	Trump did not build the wall.
	He did not stop any of the incentives there.
	And so, again, the number of people that he had coming in in four years...
	Based on the number of encounters that they have with people, who knows how many people actually came across.
	Those are the encounters that they recorded.
	It was about the same as Obama in four years as it was with Obama in eight years.
	He had done nothing to stop the border.
	As a matter of fact, the only thing that he did to stop any traffic at the border was related to COVID and to restrict movements.
	In the same way that Trudeau was restricting movements on the northern border.
	And that Biden was fine with that as well.
	So, is it really just about the money?
	Trump signed executive orders to close the border and to build a border wall, says Jack Basovian.
	Well, then why didn't it happen, Jack?
	Why didn't it happen? Why was he able to get the executive orders to work in terms of locking us down, but he couldn't lock down the border with executive orders?
	See, the reality, everybody knows what the reality is.
	You would not have this open border situation of 12 million coming in in just four years if the border had been closed.
	And it's purely fantasy.
	This is the fantasy political league.
	As a matter of fact, he didn't even need to build a wall.
	If he would have done what he said, when we talk about war abroad and we talk about the border at home, I was saying in 2017, why doesn't he end the war in Afghanistan?
	Why doesn't he bring troops home from all these other places and put them at the border as a deterrent?
	Two for one. You keep two campaign promises.
	It's going to take a certain amount of time to build a wall.
	The wall is not a full solution anyway.
	The real issue is the welfare magnet.
	But you could interdict a lot of that and reduce a lot of that.
	If you brought the troops home and used the troops to defend our border, is that a novel idea?
	Nobody ever thought of that. A lot of people thought of that.
	Nobody wanted to criticize Trump for not doing that.
	And so he didn't end the wars.
	He didn't build the wall. He didn't bring the troops home to defend our border.
	He didn't do any of that, Jack.
	So I said he's another Steve Pachenik, another CIA shill pretending to be a commentator.
	The Bill Biden's gushing out and pushing out is not designed to stop illegal immigration.
	It's designed to continue the invasion of America.
	And that is true.
	If you look at the bill that's now come out last week, they were talking about something like 150,000 a month or something.
	It worked out to 1.8 million a year that they would allow in.
	Now they're talking about $8,500 a day.
	That's over $3 million. It's almost twice as much as what had been discussed before.
	So, anyway, when you look at this, he did nothing at all to reduce spending.
	But what do you have at the border?
	And we're going to talk about the border when we come back.
	This is on Breitbart today.
	Another pro-Trump media prostitutes.
	I took a screenshot of the page there.
	And what do you see?
	You've got pictures of all these Republican governors.
	And then in the center, the Republican governors.
	Look at that. You've got all of these military vehicles, Humvees, whatever, all parked in line.
	Has Abbott done this before?
	Yes. I've said this over and over again.
	I've shown the picture in the past.
	I've referred to it many times when he took the highway patrol cars, parked them, you know, bumper to bumper in a line at the border and took a picture of it.
	Now they're doing it with military vehicles and with a little bit of a fence.
	And that is all at a two-mile area of a 2,000-mile border.
	That's absolute nonsense.
	And yet, Breitbart portrays this to its people as the Texas border showdown.
	Thirteen governors join Abbott at a state-seized park along the Rio Grande.
	Well, this is grande standing, folks.
	It's Rio Grande standing.
	Grand standing by the press, by these GOP politicians.
	They're doing nothing about the border.
	People can't see that Trump did nothing about the border.
	They can't see that these people are doing nothing about the border.
	You got citizen journalists down there saying, look, they're all clustered around this one area and there's nothing else anywhere around here.
	The wide open gaps in the wall, just a half mile away from where that area is, it's all a scam.
	It's all a show.
	Don't look at Washington as a solution.
	Don't look at the Republicans as a solution.
	They're a threat, just like the Democrats are.
	You need to understand where the threat's coming from.
	You need to understand what the threat is.
	And it may vary a little bit based on the different parties that are in power.
	But understand that Washington is a threat.
	It's not a solution. Pay attention to it.
	But don't believe their fantasy political league.
	It's absolute garbage.
	Focus on things that are local.
	You don't have any control of these governors.
	You don't have any control over Washington.
	And there's not anybody that's good in the wings to run.
	So you better focus.
	The only thing you've got, and people don't want to hear this, and people get upset with me for saying that I'm not going to support any of these presidential candidates.
	That's not where the solution is.
	And if you think you can get this solved in Washington, that's their game.
	They want you to think that.
	They want you to put all of your effort and your hope on that.
	So they can crush that hope and destroy it, because we're at a point in time where everybody's lost their respect for the institutions, and they want to bring everything down.
	They don't want you building anything.
	They don't want you doing anything.
	They want you passively sitting on the sidelines, wringing your hands, saying, oh, I hope Trump gets in, because if Trump doesn't get in, we're lost.
	Well, you've already lost it, if that's what you're thinking.
	We're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back
	Music playing...
	Analyzing the globalist's next move Music playing...
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
	From country to blues, classic hits to news, APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
	Get details at APSRadio.com.
	All right, I said at the beginning of the program, Jason Barker said this to me.
	I think this is one of the more interesting articles of the weekend here.
	So, good job, Jason.
	Jason has Knights of the Storm, along with Angry Tiger.
	Jason also does the Foxhole Report, and if you go to knightsofthestorm.com, thenightsofthestorm.com, you will find their programming.
	They've got their programs, a lot of other like-minded individuals.
	They've got this program there as well.
	But Jason Barker says, so, is this taking us one step towards transhumanism?
	You've got investors behind this thing, people like Peter Thiel, The godfather of the PayPal mafia, the biggest venture capital firms out there.
	Also, the CTO of Coinbase and other big investors have put seeded money into this thing they call Enhanced Games.
	They've got a website talking about it.
	I'll let you see the trailer and then we'll talk about what this is really about.
	I am the fastest man in the world.
	I've broken Usain Bolt's world record, but you've never heard of me.
	I am a proud, enhanced athlete.
	Now, we have important allies in our battle for bodily freedom as we build the first sporting event that allows performance enhancements and pays all athletes.
	When we first announced the Enhanced Games, the Olympic Committee said we were a joke, an idea that couldn't be taken seriously.
	But venture capitalists know that the future isn't a joke.
	Today, I'm proud to announce seed funding from investor Christian Engermeyer.
	PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel, former Coinbase CTO Balaji Srivivasan, and many other leading investors.
	With millions of dollars to support building the future of sports, we can show the world that science is real.
	The enhanced games are real.
	Yeah, this really is about transhumanism, as Jason Barker says.
	Is this why they're pushing all these superhero narratives?
	I think it is.
	They're trying to make a virtue out of people shooting up steroids.
	Let's forget about what the effects are going to be in a few years.
	How typical of these people.
	How typical of the pharmakia.
	How typical of Silicon Valley.
	And how typical of transhumanism.
	Let's not worry about the long-term health effects.
	Let's stick a brain in your chip.
	Let's stick a chip in your brain.
	So this is this recklessness, this worship of technology as a god.
	And don't worry, if we get it all wrong, we'll just freeze your body, and science will be your savior.
	And we're going to thaw you out someday, and you'll be enhanced.
	And the whole idea of human enhancement, is the idea of transhumanism, of post-humanism.
	As Elon Musk was pushing his Neuralink chip in the brain, he said, you're going to be able to transplant yourself into a robot and become a cyborg, and that's the only way that you're going to survive, the only way that you're going to compete with our system.
	These people are godless fools.
	They are rebels. They think that they are God, and they are rebels to God.
	Which is the good news.
	You know, I don't know.
	I don't think that Goliath was on steroids enhancement.
	Maybe it was some other thing that enhanced him.
	He had six fingers on each hand and six toes and all these other giants.
	Something weird was going on with that, right?
	People have talked about perhaps that was genetic modification by demonic forces or whatever.
	Maybe that's what this is as well.
	But the bigger they are, the harder they fall, as Goliath found out.
	Basic idea, says Jason, is to have games where performance-enhancing drugs are legal and to make a virtue of it.
	Let's just add that in there, right?
	To produce superhuman competitors.
	I can see this quickly morphing into full-blown transhumanism with implants and with brain chips and all the rest of this stuff.
	Absolutely. And these people will kind of be gladiators out there and everybody will be passively sitting on the side watching them as they do all kinds of things to their body so they can win a contest.
	Knowing that they're shortening their lifespan?
	Creating a situation where they're going to have an early onset of cancer or something like that?
	Nobody cares. They don't care.
	They'll do it for the fame, for the fortune, for the moment.
	And people will be looking at it.
	Many kids will be looking at this in terms of admiration.
	Yeah, we should modify our bodies as well.
	He says, I've often wondered why TV shows have moved towards featuring people with superpowers.
	These superhero type shows are mostly geared toward the teenage demographic.
	I think it was to prime us for the acceptance of things like this.
	As a matter of fact, you know, I think Syndrome got it right in The Incredibles.
	And when I'm old and I've had my fun, I'll sell my inventions so that everyone can be superheroes.
	Everyone can be super.
	And when everyone's super, no one will be.
	Yeah. And so, you know, they sell this stuff.
	You know, when you look at where these superheroes come from, so many of them have a backstory.
	Hulk got hit with gamma radiation and Spider-Man got bit with a spider that had been subjected to radiation.
	Flash gets super fast because there's an explosion of chemicals.
	And with lightning hitting his lab and all this other kind of stuff, they've been kind of pushing this stuff for a very long time.
	It's interesting. Travis, pull up the site there, enhanced.org, and when you look at the picture that they put up there, they say sports can be safer without drug testing.
	There you go. You can run at warp speed.
	No testing necessary, right?
	Because that's what warp speed is all about.
	And so now you'll be able to run at warp speed.
	You can get untested drugs and everything will be safer.
	But pull that picture back up because it's something I wanted to show about.
	Look at what they've got at the very top picture there.
	They've got somebody holding up their enhanced games flag behind them.
	But it looks very much like a cape, doesn't it?
	They should listen to Edna Moe.
	Moe capes. Remember what happened in Thunderhead?
	It turned out to be Dunderhead.
	No, I mean, they even super enhanced, and they even got them, like, flying a cape behind them.
	Enhanced world records, they say.
	And, you know, engineered supers.
	That's what we want. I'm telling you, Peter Thiel, Musk, these technocrats, and you saw, you know, these are...
	These are godless people who think they're God, think they're God, and they've got unlimited amounts of money.
	Nobody has ever had that kind of power that comes with that kind of money, not in the history of humanity.
	They're very crazy.
	It's driven them nuts.
	It's made them think that they're like God.
	And it's made them very dangerous, quite frankly, as well.
	But let's take a look at what's going on with the surveillance net that these people want to put us under.
	As they promise us an enhanced future of super beings, they're putting us under surveillance.
	And we have a case in New York.
	This goes back to an interesting...
	I remember when this happened, I reported it.
	Madison Square Garden...
	Had some law firm that was suing them.
	And I don't even remember what the...
	It's not really important even what the lawsuit was over.
	But Madison Square Garden was very angry with this law firm out of, I think, New Jersey.
	And so they have facial recognition.
	And they're constantly looking at who's coming in there at Madison Square Garden and running it through their personal database.
	And so as a woman who worked for that law firm, Went to an event at Madison Square Garden.
	She was accosted by Madison Square Garden security.
	They stopped her. She was with a group of moms that were on a field trip with their students.
	So it was a very embarrassing and humiliating thing for her because she got frog marched out of there.
	Because they were watching everybody who was coming in.
	And they were able to identify her and take her out of there before she could get in.
	Very efficient. That's where we are right now with facial recognition.
	That should concern you.
	That's just Madison Square Garden.
	Can you imagine? Well, the U.S. government with unlimited technology who's been working on this for many decades and unlimited amounts of money and personnel, can you imagine what they're capable of doing once they decide that they're going to pull the trigger?
	And so the reason they had focused on her, she said, I wasn't even involved in any of the litigation from the law firm that she worked for with Madison Square Garden, but because they hated that law firm, they programmed their facial recognition scanners for everybody that worked for that law firm.
	Anybody who worked in any capacity for that law firm is going to be banned from Madison Square Garden.
	So how'd she respond?
	Well, being a lawyer, she sued them.
	So this suit has now gone before a federal judge in New York.
	Now, the federal judge has okayed, or rather rejected, a bid to dismiss it.
	So he's okayed this lawsuit going on.
	And Madison Square Garden wanted to just preemptively dismiss this.
	He said, no, we're going to hear this case.
	And so the core of the dispute is the use of their facial scanning systems that they installed to deter individuals from coming in.
	And this is just a one corporation.
	Now, what they're saying is this violates a law in New York, the Biometric Identifier Information Protection Law.
	They could have come up with a better acronym than that, because, I mean, really, that's B-I-I-P. Or is it BIP? Your Bippy?
	You know? Rowan and Martin, you know, you bet your Bippy?
	Well, they're not going to laugh you in, they're going to laugh you out.
	And so the judge found credence in the plaintiff's assertion that Madison Square Gardens could not profit.
	Profit. That's the key thing.
	From executing face scans on specified attorneys, which might contravene the city's biometric policy.
	You see, New York City is not there to protect your privacy.
	They're not there to protect you from surveillance.
	As we see over and over again, whenever they get upset about surveillance, it's always about, well, Facebook will have this stuff, or Amazon will have this stuff, or Musk will have this stuff.
	They only get concerned about it when it's corporations.
	Because they're afraid, I guess, that the corporation is going to profit from something.
	Of course, corporations will profit by selling this to the government.
	And in many cases, they do that so they can be a beard for the government to get around prohibitions of that.
	The same way we saw it with the censorship.
	And so they're constantly, the government is constantly putting feelers out.
	And by the way, when we talk about medical martial law and all the rest of that stuff, they put out that Model State Health Emergency Powers Act in 2001 after 9-11 and the false flag of the anthrax attack and the dark winter simulation, simply because they wanted to get around the prohibitions of them being able to directly order people to do it.
	So they wanted the states to give themselves the power to do this.
	And then they would give money to the states to execute all of this.
	And so in many ways, the government is enabling and allowing these corporations to become arms of the surveillance state, just as they have become arms of the censorship state, and then pretend as they have done with censorship.
	Well, the government's not censoring people.
	It's Twitter, or it's Facebook, or it's YouTube that's censoring people.
	And they're corporations, and they can do whatever they want, and we've got conservatives who will tell you that.
	They can do whatever they want.
	Then we finally got the documentation.
	The documents that show that these orders were coming from the government telling them who to censor.
	And they were just, as I'd said for years, I said they were the velvet glove on the iron fist of government censorship.
	And even with that, These conservative libertarian think tanks have been very reluctant to demand that anything be done to stop this.
	For the longest time, they said corporations can do whatever they want.
	Well, the liberals are just the opposite.
	They don't think corporations should be able to do anything they want, but the government can do anything it wants.
	So they don't have a problem with the privacy and surveillance if it's done by the government.
	They don't have a problem if it's a corporation that is profiting from it.
	So that's really what is happening here.
	But, you know, don't expect to get any real reform, certainly not out of New York.
	But just understand what even the big corporations are capable of doing right now.
	Madison Square Garden is a very big corporation.
	They spent a couple of billion dollars on that gigantic eyeball in Las Vegas.
	And that's amazing how big that company is.
	And, just like these, Silicon Valley.
	Tech billionaires they have unlimited amounts of money and they've got very dystopian ideas about what they want to do because these people are Megalomaniacs when you become a billionaire you got that much money and you keep trying to accrue more. What does that tell you?
	These people are obsessed with money and A love of money is a root of all evil It really is these people are are showing it all the time now Ted Cruz is concerned about security at uh... airports He's not concerned about the fact that TSA is going to be rolling out their facial biometric scans to 430 airports.
	He's not worried about that.
	He wants to have special security privileges for very important people like him.
	Like him. And so he has put a rider on the FAA's budget bill and the Reauthorization Act for the FAA. And so he put something in there to have special airport security escorts for lawmakers because they're not going to do anything about TSA for you and me.
	Instead, they create this problem, and it's like, okay, we need to have special privileges then for people like me, says Ted Cruz.
	He wants dedicated security escorts to be provided for VIP lawmakers.
	Now, I'm assuming that these are like uniformed legal personnel.
	I don't think they're the kind of escorts that Jeffrey Epstein had, but you never know.
	They could be providing them as well.
	This is the federal government, after all.
	As part of a proposed bill amendment revealed on Saturday, Politico reports cruises security screen escort federal judges and cabinet members along with some family and staff members.
	Oh, see, power has its privileges, doesn't it?
	And power has a way of taking people, regardless of where they began, and making them more and more corrupt, doesn't it?
	It would grant lawmakers the ability to be screened without delay and outside of the public view.
	Who knows? Maybe they won't be screened at all.
	Just walk in with their escorts and walk on to wherever they want to go.
	They also reported Texas Republican wants to attach this to the FAA bill.
	Cruz told Politico it's about ensuring political VIPs.
	Are not endangered as they pass through open public spaces and airports.
	Is this an admission that the TSA, far from enhancing security, actually makes attacks more likely?
	And the fact that we haven't had an attack, the fact that we have TSA, which in tests they show fail over 90% of the time, that tells you that there are no threats to airports or airplanes.
	This is all theater that is happening.
	If there were threats, bunching everybody up at these TSA collection points would be really dangerous for them.
	Oh, but come on, they hire the best and the brightest for the TSA. Yeah, come to think of it, I don't know what's going on now, because have you ever seen, like, Ted Cruz hanging around in the mob waiting to go through the TSA scanners?
	I can't say I have, actually.
	Taking off his shoes and his belt and emptying his pockets and all the rest of this stuff?
	No, I haven't seen that either.
	So I don't know what kind of privileges, extra privileges, this would be.
	I guess maybe having escorts to escort them to their private areas?
	Instead of having these people get into our private areas.
	That's what's really happening here.
	But seriously...
	As I've talked about this in the past, you know, they set up these weapon and bomb screening things and entrances to churches in some African nations where the Muslims are attacking the Christians.
	And what do the Muslims do?
	Well, they just set off a suicide bomb where everybody's bunched up trying to go through security.
	You set up these security checkpoints and they actually make things a lot more dangerous.
	But, you know, going back to 2011, as I've also mentioned many times, a TSA lawsuit against those body scanners and the pat-downs and stuff, they discovered, and it went up momentarily by mistake, they put up the unredacted lawsuit, the unredacted documents as part of discovery,
	and those were up for a few hours, and then they realized they put up the unredacted version, they took it down, they put up the redacted version, which made it very easy for us to see, What they didn't want us to see, and that was in 2011, they said there are no threats to airports or airplanes,
	and that was when they were going to make Texas a no-fly zone because you had a pushback from David Simpson and some other Texas legislators that had passed unanimously in the House to stop these naked body scanners and the pat-downs, and so they know that there's no threat.
	The serious security threats facing public officials lamented Cruz.
	It's important we take reasonable steps to keep everyone safe.
	No, he's just talking about people like him.
	Very important people.
	The rest of us are deplorable.
	We are non-essential, as Trump said.
	Deplorable, as Hillary said.
	So, there's no threats.
	It's all theater. And so these guys want to opt out of it because...
	They're very important. You and I are not important.
	We're not essential. This is from a listener, Bill.
	He says, how come no one realizes that the mark of the beast is facial recognition, real ID? And of course, you know, when you look at it, what does the Bible say about it?
	It says, you know, people got a mark, you know, on their hand or on their head or something like that.
	It could be something like this.
	Could be identification.
	You know, all these IDs are about assigning a number.
	You know, they're going to be analyzing you and the computer.
	So getting a handprint, getting a headprint, all these different things certainly do seem like it, don't they?
	And it's not like a mark, like a tattoo or something, right?
	That'd be a stigma. In Revelation, when it talks about it, it's got a different word.
	It's called, and I'm not sure if I'm pronouncing this right, krogma.
	Which is an official government document seal that they would use at the time.
	Very different from saying we're going to mark you or tattoo you or something like that.
	It's a government official thing attached to your hand, maybe your handprint, maybe your head, your facial recognition, that type of thing.
	Interesting, isn't it? Who would have made that up or thought that'd be possible 2,000 years ago?
	The government's PSA... Well, he says, if you didn't have real ID by the constantly changing implementation date, you couldn't go into a federal building or fly commercially.
	But he says here in Indiana, where he is, under Davos Nazi Eric Holcomb, you get marked at the Bureau of Motor Vehicles, or you get no ID, and you can't conduct the most elementary business in the state.
	And as I said before, you know, they pulled a fast one on me, not that I'm trying to hide, you know...
	Pretty well known what I do.
	But it would have gotten me a lot more upset if I had not gone public.
	And that was, you know, when I went to get licensed, you know, you'd always sit and have your picture taken and stuff like that.
	And so she comes back and she says, okay, we need, you know, these other documents and sit down and we'll have your picture taken.
	And she gives it to me and says, oh, and you've got a gold star, which means...
	That you now are in the real ID system.
	It's like, well, I didn't want to be in the real ID. You didn't ask me if I wanted to be.
	They sneak it in, and they do it at the Department of Motor Vehicles, and not just in Indiana.
	It's here in Tennessee as well.
	And she mentioned that. She said, well, that's good.
	That's a feature because now you'll be able to fly on an airplane beginning next year.
	It's like, well, I don't want to fly on an airplane as it is right now.
	They're marking us without using tattoos, as was done in the past.
	This method of marking is stealth.
	It's cleaner, and it's a lot more effective.
	He says, am I wrong? No, you're not, Bill.
	That's exactly what is going on.
	And they're doing it by stealth.
	So... The Brownstone article, Daniel Nusio, who I disagreed with him last week on an article.
	I agree with him on this.
	The headline got my attention.
	The greatest trick that Big Brother ever pulled.
	And, of course, that's what people say about the devil, right?
	He said, depending on who you talk to, the quote would be attributed to Charles Baudelaire or to Kaiser Soze.
	Yeah. And the usual suspects.
	The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist.
	And he said, when you stop and think about it, that's what's going on with the surveillance state, to convince people that it doesn't really exist.
	He says, you imagine when you think of 1984, some kind of an East Germany powered by Google and Amazon.
	You recall your favorite dystopian sci-fi film or maybe a horror stories of China's social credit system, but you definitely don't think of a guy in a lawn chair, jotting down license plate numbers of passing vehicles in a notebook.
	And so they talk about a police chief who's defending the use of automated license plate readers.
	Now, he's not sitting there writing these things down manually in a lawn chair.
	It'd be far less dangerous if that were the case.
	Instead, what they now have is the ability with cameras and with artificial intelligence.
	Artificial intelligence is the killer app, folks, for the surveillance and control state.
	And so that's the direction that we're headed.
	By the way, I've got some comments from listeners here.
	On Rockfin, thank you very much, Eric.
	I appreciate the tip. Thank you.
	See your name there very often.
	Thank you so much for the support.
	On Rockfin, Audi Modern Retro Radio.
	He says, government workers at the administration level make three times the national average of private sector employees.
	They are leeches. Well, you're absolutely right.
	It's amazing. When you look at Washington, D.C., for example, and you look at the number of people that are making six-figure salaries all over the place, for what?
	As a matter of fact, I'd pay them more if they'd leave us alone.
	Unfortunately, many of them take their job very seriously, as well as a lot of serious money.
	On Rumble, Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip.
	He says, David, do you have a live audio stream anywhere?
	I'll be going back to work in a couple of weeks, and I really have gotten addicted to the show live since I've been home, recovering from my motorcycle crash.
	Ooh, I'm glad you're recovering.
	Travis says, we're working on it, on getting it done.
	He says, I think I know how to do it now, but it's just a real hassle to do the way the studio is routed.
	So we're going to have to change some things in the routing of the studio.
	But yeah, that's a goal, to try to get that up.
	And it's just us, and so we're kind of stretched on manpower right now.
	That's why we haven't done some of the things that we would like to do.
	It also doesn't help. I'm a little dumb.
	No, you're not. No, you're not.
	Travis put this whole thing together for us, and I appreciate that.
	But anyway, yeah, we'll try to get that up, and we'll let people know when that goes through.
	But there's a couple of different places that we use that will let us put up live audio.
	We just got to figure out where and how we're going to implement it here and which one of them we're going to use.
	So when we talk about the greatest trick Big Brother ever played, They do this without really getting people focused on it.
	That's why I talked about Madison Square Garden, the fact that it's already there.
	The fact that it was there and so effective and so fast that these guys were able to stop this woman.
	And so, he says, you probably heard of facial recognition being used for relatively petty purposes, like that.
	Or leading to incidents in which innocent people were harassed or arrested.
	And there's other surveillance gadgets that are under the radar for a lot of people.
	Things like gunshot detection or cell site simulators.
	Cell site simulators, that's something we've talked about for a very long time.
	Harris Semiconductor had Stingray, they call it.
	And I remember when I was talking about this about 10 years ago, and I've been talking about this for a very long time, they would use the cell phone site spoofing and stuff like that to follow people and to track them and do it without a search warrant.
	And there was a case that came up, and that aspect, the fact they didn't have a search warrant, was there.
	And they said, well, we know what was happening because we had the stingray thing.
	And the judge says, well, I need to hear more about that.
	And they said, well, we can't tell you anything about that, judge, because we've got a nondisclosure agreement with Harris.
	He says, you don't have a nondisclosure agreement with me.
	You either tell me how you use this thing and what it is, or I'm going to let this guy go that they had arrested.
	And they said, well, we're not going to tell you.
	And so I let him walk.
	Because it was more important for them to protect their secret agreement than it was for them to protect the public.
	What a surprise. Automatic license plate readers.
	Pose a real threat to privacy on par with facial recognition and the rest of these things.
	But people don't really understand the fact that, and I've harped on this, and even in these types of articles, they don't refer to it by what the intelligence community refers to it.
	Geospatial intelligence.
	That's where James Clapper rose to prominence.
	It's been the fastest growing part of the intelligence community since the 90s.
	Geospatial intelligence.
	And so they use social media, but especially all the cameras and the cell phone detectors and anything, to map where people are.
	And to also make predictions about what you're going to do.
	So they want to be able to follow people around, create patterns for people, because that allows them to do the other AI. Not artificial intelligence, but anticipatory intelligence, to anticipate what you're going to do.
	You see, the...
	The facial scanning database at Madison Square Gardens is Child's Play.
	These people have been doing facial recognition, working on anticipatory intelligence with geospatial intelligence.
	It's way beyond geofencing where they got everybody that was around the Capitol or the Washington area on January the 6th.
	It's way beyond that. And they've been working on this for decades prior to the lockdowns.
	They would have annual conventions.
	They'd have 4,000 or 5,000 Contractors and government bureaucrats who would show up and spooks who would show up at these geospatial intelligence conventions.
	So at the town hall in Urbana, Illinois, for example, he says, then police chief Bryant Serafin worked to dismiss the notion that automated license plate readers actually pose a threat to privacy or that they constitute a surveillance tool.
	Well, the director of the University of Illinois' Community Data Clinic said, And she said all this
	is possible with the automated license plate readers.
	She's just described geospatial intelligence, but nobody wants to use that word.
	Nobody wants to. It's to find out and to infer everything about where you are, what your patterns of behavior are, what your religious beliefs are, what your political beliefs are, who your friends are, and that type of thing.
	And so he assured her with a frustrated chuckle, he says, that the automated license plate readers simply provide a notebook that will only be referenced when investigating serious crimes.
	But just like a geofence, and we saw with January 6th, people get caught up in this, and the only crime was being in the vicinity there.
	As he finishes this article, Daniel says, one guy in a lawn chair, jotting down license plate numbers as a nosy neighbor, maybe even a neighborhood crank, but not someone to whom you would pay much attention.
	But when he starts following you around, though to the point of knowing who your friends are, where you worship, and when you go to the doctor, what kind of doctor you go to, he becomes a stalker.
	And when he develops the ability to gather this kind of information on everyone, he starts to develop a level of omnipresence and omniscience, and I would say omnipotence, all the three attributes of God, right?
	Knowing everything, always present, and all-powerful, which no one should be comfortable with.
	And so you're told he's just a guy in a lawn chair writing down license plate numbers.
	It's really bad. And, of course, AI is supercharging this.
	That's an op-ed piece on Brownstone from Daniel Nusio.
	And that's what this is ultimately about.
	It's what it's been for a very long time.
	And it's way beyond even things like automated license plate readers.
	It can be very simple stuff.
	It can be the cell phone signal connection that you've got.
	That's going to apply even if you've got a flip phone.
	Right? And they can do that.
	And it's going to be beyond automated license plate readers.
	And now they've got a new thing.
	And let me show you this new thing here.
	This is the micro flyer.
	And this is a piece from Northwestern University where they have developed this.
	Now you've seen in the past the like robotic mosquito that you've probably seen.
	And that's an artistic creation.
	But this unfortunately is for real.
	And it's much smaller than a mosquito.
	Take a look at this.
	Inspired by nature, a team of engineers at Northwestern University, the flying microchip, look at that next to an ant.
	Look at how small it is.
	Smallest ever human made flying structures like the size of a grain of sand.
	The goal of this project has been to add capability for winged flight to electronic circuit chips with the idea that those capabilities would allow us to distribute highly functional with miniaturized electronic devices that could sense the environment for disease tracking, population surveillance, maybe monitoring of environmental contamination.
	Did you catch that? He tells you what the purpose is, right?
	These people at Northwestern, these engineers, are developing this.
	And as I've said many times, they don't think about how this stuff is going to be used.
	Well, this guy thinks about how it's going to be used.
	It's going to be used to detect disease, to track and watch the population, and even part of the climate agenda.
	You've got the pandemic MacGuffin, you've got the climate MacGuffin, and of course you've got total population surveillance and control.
	With the excuse to say we've got to protect people from pandemics and we've got to protect them from climate change.
	And so we've got to have these flying microchips to spy on people.
	See, that's where it always comes back.
	It always comes back to universal ID, surveillance, and control.
	These other things are just the MacGuffin to get you there.
	And it's absolutely reprehensible, I think, for engineers to build this kind of stuff.
	This is not just an intellectual puzzle.
	It has real consequences for you and for everybody in the future.
	So, this is...
	The invisible flying objects is the way it's described by Burt Oliver at Brownstone.
	And when you saw that picture there, he had his index finger out there, and he had four or five of them on his index finger.
	Again, they're no bigger than a grain of sand.
	Very small compared even to an ant or to a mosquito or a bug.
	It'll be used by organizations to detect thought crimes.
	It's just another kind of...
	And again, that AI, anticipatory intelligence, is now going to be made possible after several decades of working on this, at least 30 decades of actually trying to implement this.
	Anticipatory intelligence in doing it.
	They use it in foreign wars.
	That's part of their testbed.
	James Madison said the instruments that we use to fight foreign wars will come home as instruments of tyranny.
	He didn't even see this level of technological sophistication in the military-industrial complex.
	He was just looking at human nature.
	Boy, this has become a business model now doing tests abroad and their perpetual eternal wars So they can then go to war with us domestically and so that anticipatory intelligence that they've been practicing abroad will come home and be Weaponized by the use of artificial intelligence Spielberg's minority report he points out the difference in that versus What we're seeing now that predictive programming course
	and that it was some kind of mysterious Mind reading people that were there Bye.
	So I guess we're safe, right?
	That's not practical. No, they're going to make something even far worse than that.
	Far worse than the two or three precogs that he had there.
	Gates has patented his exclusive right to computerize the human body, as we've talked about in the past, to say, well, I can transmit energy.
	I can use the human body to transmit energy.
	I can use the human body to generate energy.
	And I want to try to patent this.
	The human body says in the patent, human body used as a conductive medium over which power and or data is distributed.
	One or more devices to be powered, coupled to the human body via additional sets of electrodes and all the rest of the stuff.
	Isn't it odd how there's this commonality from Bill Gates to Elon Musk?
	But of course, Elon Musk is a good guy.
	He's our good guy out there.
	Except they all want to hack our bodies.
	They all want to do something with our bodies.
	Maybe that was one of the reasons why, you know, Alex, he knew that was happening.
	So he did that little commercial where he was talking about Bill Gates.
	Everybody was saying, well, you know, Bill Gates has been all about IDs and vaccines and patenting the human body to transmit power and to draw power from the human body.
	Maybe that's what this is. That's whether We're admitting that the new forced inoculations coming next year will actually maim and kill a lot of people because Bill Gates knows he can't hide it.
	That's why Trump is taking control of the process saying he's going to have an early vaccine from a company that doesn't make one that is so dangerous or that doesn't change our DNA. And I'm not even endorsing what Trump's doing, but I understand what he's doing.
	And I'm not even endorsing what Trump's doing.
	And I'm not even endorsing what Trump's doing.
	Gates goes, trust my vaccine, but don't trust the CDC's vaccine.
	And then I went and looked up the ones that Trump's looking at.
	They're very weak, attenuated, classic viruses with a very low amount of adjuvant in it.
	Yeah. And what is adjuvant?
	It makes your body have an autoimmune response because a lot of times if a vaccine's weak, which again doesn't hurt you as bad, you're not going to have the autoimmune response.
	You're not going to form antibodies. So they've got to give you The squalene or the mercury or the aluminum to trigger that.
	And so, yeah, Trump's looking at basically sugar water for folks.
	Can we take a little bit of an attenuated, microwaved or radiated COVID deal?
	Absolutely. COVID's already everywhere anyways.
	Trump's looking at...
	What a liar. I talked to somebody over the weekend and they'd not heard that, not seen that.
	Well, I got to play it again.
	Because, you know, Alex knew that it wasn't a virus that was being attenuated or killed.
	He knew that it was mRNA, which is genetic instructions.
	Nothing at all. And he knew what all this stuff was about.
	They told people it's like sugar water.
	The sprawling radio network that China's firewall cannot stop.
	This is coming from the Epoch Times.
	And in this, they're holding out the idea of a pocket-sized shortwave radio.
	And so that's how they're getting around China's firewall.
	Is this something that could be used here?
	Unfortunately, I don't really see that's the case.
	I think it's going to have to be person to person.
	I think it's going to have to be some kind of physical media passed around.
	I don't think there's anything electronic that they can't shut down if they want to badly enough.
	Now, they haven't done it. And, you know, they used Radio Free Europe.
	They use Voice of America, other propaganda things to beam stuff into the Soviet Union and also into China.
	I did the interview with the Navy SEAL Drago.
	I talked about when he was growing up behind the Soviet Union when he was in Poland and so they had control of Poland.
	And how his uncle set him up with a radio and said, here...
	Put this under your pillow and you can listen to the other information from outside.
	And that was the thing that got him aware that he was being lied to all the time.
	And he wanted to get somewhere where the information was free.
	It's not free here anymore. They're going to shut that down as well.
	But when you look at the shortwave radio that was used in the past, That has been used by people in China now.
	And they point out, this is the Epoch Times.
	The Epoch Times is connected to the Falun Gong, who have been, and it's a cult, I don't know how much of it is religious and how much of it is like this new age psychological cult thing, but they've been ruthlessly persecuted by China, just as they have persecuted Muslims and especially Christians, but nobody wants to talk about the Christians.
	They'll talk about the Uyghurs, they'll talk about the Falun Gong, but everybody just forgets about the Christians.
	But they said that, and this is again, Epoch Times is talking about the people, predominantly the Falun Gong, who are trying to get this information.
	When you have something like this, you're going to have to have somebody transmitting this.
	It's going to be outside their jurisdiction.
	Or they'll just track down the signal and shut it down.
	And so when I look at this, I don't see this as being of any use, really, for a world government situation.
	Because these people are all on the same page.
	And they'll work to shut these things down if somebody's opposing that.
	Radio powerhouses like the BBC, Voice of America and others.
	Have cut back on their China service or they move their programs online and then they can't get through the Great Firewall.
	So that's why the Epoch Times is writing this about shortwave broadcasting.
	I say, you know, anything may work.
	I'm just, and we should, I'm not saying don't do something with shortwave radio.
	It's small enough off of the side that maybe they won't pay any attention to it.
	So for that purpose, it might be very effective.
	And it might be able to survive longer because it would look at it as some kind of a niche thing they didn't really have to address.
	But ultimately, I think it is going to be in an underground economy, it's going to be handing off somebody's tapes or something.
	I think it's where we're headed. And when you look at censorship, We're good to go.
	Has interesting pieces at times.
	It is a pro-Trump site.
	Makes no bones about that.
	He says, He says, He says, And my comment is never posted anymore.
	It used to be that when I posted comments in the past that let some of them get through after passing through moderation, the ones that were not critical of Trump got through, of course.
	The ones that were critical did not.
	At least they let some of my comments through.
	Then Conservative Treehouse eased up on me and let me post at will for a bit.
	I no longer had to go through moderation.
	So he says, I took advantage of that to get the truth about Trump out there.
	Now I've been banned totally.
	Even when they have nothing to do with Trump, my comments are not approved.
	So he said, as you can see, and we see this over and over again, conservative sites are canceling people too.
	And they're bragging about that.
	The bastions of free speech and freedom do the same thing that lefties do.
	What a surprise. It's just like how you point out that most alternative media sites are biased and they overlook Trump's misdeeds.
	And of course, when you...
	When you look at, just as concerning, this idea that we're, okay, you canceled us, we're going to cancel everybody on this.
	You know, we will ban people on here if they get abusive to the group.
	If they come on as a troll and they just want to shut, and people can be enough of a troll that they shut down the discussion.
	And so we do that with live comments.
	But the biggest part of this is this partisanship.
	That sees Washington as being the solution and not the threat.
	And that's the biggest problem with all this.
	Even bigger than the censorship, I think.
	It's the idea that everything is lost if we don't have Trump in.
	If we get another four years of Biden, that's it.
	There's no hope for America.
	And so we've got to stop that at all costs.
	And that's what's really driving this censorship.
	Well, and also the fact that they want to cater to an audience.
	But they... A conservative treehouse, they may really buy into this thing that Trump is really our savior.
	And to try to shut that down, think that they're doing good work doing that.
	German fact-checker that gets money from the German government from Facebook from Soros and from the Omidyar Network Is now calling the protesting farmers conspiracy theorists Calling them anti-vaxxers and all the rest of this stuff, and it's interesting you know when you look at it Pierre Omidyar is somebody that's not really on the radar most Americans like Bill Gates
	except in India The saying went that Bill Gates owned the land and Pierre Omidyar owned the farmers Why was that?
	Well, because he was using glyphosate extensively.
	Not necessarily just glyphosate, but genetically modified pesticides.
	And once you go down that path, they were able to turn these farmers into essentially sharecroppers.
	Because once you put that GMO on there, it gets rid of the weeds, but it also poisons the soil for anything other than Monsanto's GMO seeds.
	Nothing else will grow there. That's why farmers have pushed so hard to try to stop this because of the drift that will carry the pesticides onto their land and poison their land so they can't grow anything except for Monsanto seeds, or now it's owned by Bayer.
	And so you can't even, you know, create seed for the next product next year.
	So they would have to buy their seed every year from the corporations.
	And Pierre Omidyar put himself in that position.
	And so they got into a situation where they couldn't really make any money at all farming.
	And there's massive suicides of Indian farmers who were driven into economic despair because of that.
	Now, Pierre Omidyar was the one who was behind the...
	The outlet that was created in the wake of the Ed Snowden document release, they created, I can't remember what it was, it was the Intercept.
	And Pierre Amityar funded that, and I was always skeptical of that.
	Glenn Greenwald was picked to run that because he was one of the key sources that was given information from Ed Snowden.
	And so I was always skeptical of that.
	Now, Glenn Greenwald has, you know, many years ago, he left them.
	He said they're too political in what they're doing.
	That's what it was designed to do.
	And so this Omidyar Network is another one of these billionaires out there trying to control narrative.
	Just like Jeff Bezos buying Washington Post.
	And all the rest is George Soros' Open Society, Facebook, all doing that.
	So this organization is getting money from all of these, you know, from Facebook, from Soros, from Amityar, from the German government, has now run a fact-checking We've seen that before, too, haven't we? With Trudeau and the truckers' convoy.
	So they're engaged in peaceful protests.
	In Germany, the government there has been in serious trouble ever since they had the energy shock that was part of the government cutting it off for the green agenda.
	Another part of that was the Biden administration blowing up the pipelines.
	But, of course, the German government had already turned those pipelines off.
	The alternative for Deutschland was saying, open it up.
	You know, open up these pipelines.
	And so that's when the pipelines were blown up.
	He was not going to be able to resist the political pressure anymore.
	So the U.S. went in and blew up the pipelines for them.
	But this effort to shut down gas is coming from the German establishment government there.
	That's one of the reasons why the alternative for Deutschland is gaining in popularity so much there.
	So their response is to demonize the farmers and to demonize that third party.
	That is there. With the mass farmer protests, they've also been trying to push back against that and to ban AFD, the Alternative for Deutschland, calling them COVID misinformationists, Russian supporters, all the rest of the stuff. And the organization that is doing all of this smear campaign, all this labeling of them, is a company called Corrective.
	And it gets its money from Soros, Omidyar, Zuckerberg, and the German government.
	The corrective article specifically they're talking about here doesn't even specify what COVID disinformation the farmers are spreading.
	We see how they're all connected.
	All these MacGuffins are converging now.
	So, you know, you're an anti-vaxxer, and you're also opposed to our climate nonsense to shut down all the food supply.
	Because they were always the same thing anyway.
	They were just different beards for the same end result.
	Nor does it offer any evidence of ties between the farmers and the Russian government.
	Only that there are some Twitter accounts that support the farmers and have in the past written posts that coincided with the methods of a pro-Russian propaganda network or that there were farmers who were informed enough that they knew what was going on with the vaccine stuff as well.
	And so if you oppose their narrative, if you oppose multiple of their narratives, well, then they just demonize you for all of those.
	In the UK, the Online Safety Act is now specifically granting mainstream media permission to post lies.
	You see, if they label something as misinformation or disinformation, you'll be punished, you'll be banned.
	But they specifically end the bill.
	Exempt mainstream media.
	Exempt like The Guardian, BBC, Disney, and others.
	Because they are so tightly connected with the government, they're not going to tell you anything that the government would want you to not know.
	So they'll never give you any quote-unquote false information.
	False information is just something that contradicts the government's narrative, even when the government's narrative is fake.
	So when you look at this, this is from Zero Hedge.
	Actually, it's from Off Guardian.
	They have... First of all, the prohibition of any information that they believe is not true.
	And that's their subjective determination.
	So, that is prohibited.
	And then, that's in section 179.
	The next section, 180, exempts all mainstream media outlets from this new law.
	It says, exemptions from this are a recognized news publisher.
	Or the holder of a license under the Broadcasting Act.
	Or a multiple licensee holder from the government and somebody who does on-demand programming.
	Well, we know who that is. It's all the usual suspects who are out there lying to people all the time.
	Welcome to the modern definition of freedom of speech, where the mainstream media are directly and explicitly permitted to, quote, knowingly publish false information with intent to cause non-trivial harm, quote-unquote, from the law.
	In other words, They first say they were going to punish people who knowingly publish false information with intent to cause non-trivial harm, and then they exempt, exempt from this, are the mainstream media, the BBC, the Guardian, and so forth.
	So that means that the Guardian and the BBC are able to knowingly publish false information.
	When you look at Voice of America, these propaganda organizations, it was in 2013, the Smith-Munt Act.
	When they created these propaganda organizations, again, there were going to be weapons used abroad.
	We're going to use propaganda and we're going to beam it into the Soviet Union and into China and other places like that.
	And sometimes it was just true stuff that the Russians or the Chinese communists didn't want people to know.
	That's called white propaganda.
	And black propaganda...
	White propaganda is true stuff that the government doesn't want you to know.
	Black propaganda is a lie.
	And so Voice of America was doing both types of propaganda.
	And we had Radio Free Europe and other things like that.
	The American government was concerned that if they gave license to do that type of thing, it might be done here domestically as well.
	And so they created something called the Smith-Munt Act to prohibit that.
	In 2013, the Obama administration removed that prohibition.
	And it was really kind of a moot point anyway, because we'd already had for a very long time the Mockingbird Press reporting exactly what the CIA wanted reported and giving their opinion of what that was.
	So your three nightly news broadcasts were all talking about the same subjects and had the same opinion of all three subjects because they were getting fed that information from the CIA, Operation Mockingbird.
	And then you also had NPR, which is hardcore government propaganda.
	So to one extent, it was really kind of a vestige, but it was interesting to see that the Obama administration removed that little bit of an impediment there.
	And it was telltale that they were going to be heading into heavy propaganda.
	And, of course, the instruments of a propaganda war abroad are going to be brought home.
	And Voice of America, that's where Tucker Carlson's dad always worked.
	That's why Tucker Carlson, I think, wanted to work for the CIA because it was a CIA operation.
	Which begs the point when Tucker is telling everybody that, you know, 9-11 is real.
	Government had nothing to do with it.
	When he keeps silent about Building 7.
	When he keeps silent about the vaccine.
	That type of thing. Who is he working for?
	With the EU's own Digital Services Act coming into force later this month, and all the focus on misinformation and disinformation at Davos two weeks ago, we can see the real crackdown on internet free speech is about to kick into high gear.
	Oh, absolutely. It's going to be supercharged with artificial intelligence.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	I want to continue with this.
	What happened to the person who was responsible for the Vault 7 leak?
	And it's interesting how even the conservative mainstream media wants to dance around what Vault 7 really was.
	This guy is getting essentially a life sentence in prison.
	We'll be right back. You're
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Let's talk about the music.
	Let's talk about Vault 7.
	And the person who leaked this, I've talked about this many times, is a hack.
	And of course, it was essentially a hack.
	As Goatree has pointed out many times, he said, when they're doing cybersecurity and look at a leak or something, the first thing you do is you look at the people who had access to the data.
	Because it usually is somebody who is on the inside leaking this.
	That's the simplest way to do it.
	And so most of the time it's not some sophisticated outside penetration, but it's something that is happening on the inside for whatever motive.
	And so we've had some very damaging information that has been leaked that way.
	You know, when you look at the collateral murder tapes showing the literal murder of people by the gunships and things like that, so damaging is why they want to Kill Julian Assange, that along with the things that he exposed about Hillary Clinton.
	But this is Vault 7.
	And this guy is now 35 years old.
	A former CIA programmer has been sentenced to 40 years in prison.
	The Department of Justice wanted a life sentence, but I don't know, that's 75 years.
	That's pretty much a life sentence anyway.
	Maybe there's a difference in how they would treat it for parole.
	I don't know. But it's interesting that even when the Epoch Times reports it, it kind of skirt around the issue of what Vault 7 was.
	And far more important than the fact that it was leaked, because there's been a lot of leaks, there's been a lot of hacks of vital information in Washington.
	But the most important thing is to understand what Vault 7 was, and they kind of obscure that.
	The prosecutor sought a life sentence for him.
	He gave that to whistleblowing organizations like WikiLeaks.
	The files were dated between 2013 and 2016.
	They concerned, listen, this is how they define Vault 7.
	And it's insufficient.
	They missed the most important thing about Vault 7.
	It's that it contained tactics and tools used by the CIA to surveil foreign governments.
	Yeah, they don't ever look at Americans, do they?
	Alleged extremists and others.
	Others. Yeah, people who are not foreign governments or alleged extremists.
	That'd be ordinary people who live in America, being spite of the CIA. In other words, the foreign governments and the alleged extremists, that would be part of their brief to do that, right?
	Yeah. But they go beyond that.
	They also look at others.
	And that's not defined by the Epoch Times.
	Because if that was defined by the Epoch Times, they'd have a lot more...
	They'd be treated in America kind of like the Falun Gong.
	Their friends in China are treated by the Chinese government.
	By compromising their electronics, including smartphones, computers, smart TVs, and messaging applications.
	That is not anywhere close to the most important thing about Vault 7.
	Vault 7 is important because it showed us how they could spoof.
	It's not just the fact that they hack.
	Everybody's got hacking tools.
	And so it wasn't about that.
	It was about how they could spoof other countries.
	And that is especially important because the Obama administration had said if we have a cybersecurity attack on our infrastructure, if it's done by China, we have the right to physically attack China if they have a cyber attack on our infrastructure.
	Well, how do you know it's China? Well, Vault 7 showed that the CIA could make it look like they were any country that they wanted.
	That's the most important thing for people to understand.
	That's why I continue to repeat this all the time.
	Because there's going to come a time when there's going to be a false...
	The easiest thing, easiest way they could do a false flag attack and start a major war with any country that they want to start it with is by using the tools that were exposed in Vault 7.
	They can do whatever they want.
	They can do it electronically. And then they can point the finger, as they've already done, with Russiagate.
	They said, well, we know this is coming from Russia because, you know, you can look at how the keys were typed and all this and that type of whatever their forensic things are.
	But Vault 7 showed that that was a complete lie.
	So, this is, just understand when you look at this, the most important part of Vault 7 is not being told to you, not even by the mainstream alternative media.
	And then we have this.
	Dead people should be able to change their gender.
	And this is coming from a member of parliament.
	This is how bad it is.
	Is Western civilization under judgment by God?
	Yes. You can tell by the leaders that we have here.
	And I absolutely agree with Mike Johnson when he said, you know, we're all here because God has ordained or allowed us to be here.
	And we should understand that.
	And for those of us who look at the group of clowns that are running our countries everywhere, we should be very fearful of that because it shows that God is very displeased with us, I think.
	And so this person here, Labor MP Charlotte Nichols, It was reported by the Telegraph, by the Mail, as well as being picked up secondary sources.
	Daily Skeptic is this one.
	Ms. Nichols, the MP representative for Warrington North, asked if the Gender Recognition Act of 2004 could be edited in order to allow transgender people who are deceased to be legally remembered by the gender they live by.
	Now, this is really kind of crazy, but in a sense...
	It tells us about the grooming of the children too, doesn't it?
	Because like children, like young children, that they are manipulating psychologically with this stuff.
	Don't tell your parents.
	Don't tell your parents.
	Don't tell your parents about the games that we play at school.
	That is pedophilia.
	That is grooming if they're classic.
	Classic. That's what these people are doing in school.
	But in the same way, just as children cannot make this kind of determination, Neither can dead people.
	So why not? I mean, it all fits, doesn't it?
	The kids can't make this determination.
	The dead people can't.
	But you've got activists who are going to make that determination that they're a different gender.
	That's exactly what she's talking about.
	She said the genesis of the petition...
	It was the murder of my constituent, Breonna Gay, whose life was brutally cut short before she was old enough to have formal legal recognition of who she was and how she will be remembered by her family, friends, and our community.
	So we need to posthumously change her gender.
	But you notice that she wasn't old enough.
	So this was a child that they were going to change her mind or change it for her.
	And then she died, and so they still want to do it, even after this child is dead.
	That is how insane this society has now become.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk about the border.
	We'll be right back. Whether you're feeling like the blues or bluegrass, APS Radio has you covered.
	Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APSRadio.com.
	Thank you. You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well we now have had the Senate finally release their Immigration Act. It's 370 pages long. It's just ridiculous. They continue to load these things up. As I pointed out last week, there's been two whistleblowers have told one organization that there's a 1,200 page document that's being put together by the ATF to try to claim that they can ban all private gun sales by playing
	games with the definition of what a dealer is, a gun dealer is.
	But here's one that's 370 pages long.
	I said, you know, the 1200 pages, I said, that's about the length of a typical Bible.
	Man, this is about one quarter or third of a Bible right here, 370 pages.
	The Immigration Act, there were details that had been leaked.
	People said, well, looks like they're going to allow 1.8 million people to cross illegally without any vetting or anything across the border every year.
	Turns out it's higher than that.
	It's 3.1 million.
	And then you have, in response to it, of course, the Speaker says it's dead on arrival.
	He had already said that, based on the rumors of 1.8 million.
	So now if it's going to be 8,500 people a day, that's 3.1 million for the year.
	He says it's not going to pass if they can do anything about it.
	But, of course, they've only got a margin of one or two votes, so they have very many defections.
	That's not going to be stoppable.
	But he has said that...
	In the past, Biden doesn't need Congress to act.
	And of course, as I said, neither did Trump.
	But they didn't say that when Trump was president.
	Now they're saying it when Biden is president.
	He also says that Biden is not, this is Speaker Johnson, says Biden is not being allowed to do anything about the border due to his staff.
	Well, does that mean that Trump was not allowed to do anything about the border due to his staff, due to the military-industrial complex, due to Goldman Sachs or other people who had influence with him?
	Again, the buck stops with the president.
	Isn't it interesting how everybody wants to put full responsibility, Republicans want to put full responsibility, and the MAGA voters want to put full responsibility for Biden for these issues?
	For things like the vaccine and the lockdowns and the border and all the rest of the stuff and the war.
	And they should. But they will not put any responsibility whatsoever on Trump.
	Everything that happens under Biden is the fault of Biden, and it is.
	But they won't say that about Trump.
	And so, on the other side, you've got a Democrat criticizing the GOP's obsession with the border.
	And labels Mayorkas impeachment a sham.
	Guess which Democrat this is?
	Bob Menendez.
	The guy who, if there was any integrity in Congress at all, this guy would be in jail.
	He would not be sitting in the Senate.
	He has had, this is his second go-round.
	This is the guy that had all the gold bars and all the rest of this stuff.
	And they've got him dead to rights.
	And this isn't the first time for this guy either.
	But he's already beaten the rap once.
	I guess he figures he can beat it again.
	And he's sucking up to the Department of Justice.
	I wonder why Bob Menendez would be sucking up to these people with his long criminal allegations that are staring him in the face.
	So, Lindsey Graham was a character witness for Bob Menendez.
	That ought to tell you everything you need to know.
	But the Senate is not going to clean house.
	And they are not going to protect our border either.
	As a matter of fact, New York City has launched a large program to hand out prepaid credit cards to migrant families.
	This is one of the reasons why they were shipping the...
	Shipping the migrants up to them and said, we want, send us all your migrants.
	We love having more migrants and we're sanctuary city and all the rest of stuff.
	And then they started complaining about the fact that they're being overwhelmed, but now they put out another big welfare magnet.
	Go figure. Why do you think that when they interview people at the border and you've seen the reporter who goes down there, where are you from?
	Where are you headed? Right?
	They're from all over the world, but they're all headed to New York City because of this type of stuff.
	So New York City, even though Eric Adams, the mayor, is saying we're overwhelmed, he's just doing that because he wants more federal money.
	And what this is, folks, is this is a way of setting up universal basic income.
	And universal basic income is being rolled in in all of these Democrat-controlled cities.
	Who are, for the most part, bankrupt.
	One of the first ones to come out and announce that they're going to have a universal basic income program was Stockton, California.
	One of the biggest cities to declare bankruptcy.
	And so, they're totally bankrupt, but they're going to give universal basic income to everybody.
	And that's what he's doing here.
	So anybody, as they arrive at the Roosevelt Hotel, the city will give them cash to help them buy food and other things while they provide them a place to live.
	It'll start with a group of 500 migrant families and short-term hotel stays, and it will replace the current food service offered there according to City Hall.
	But it's really about welfare.
	It's about a welfare magnet.
	And it's about helping to establish universal basic income.
	Cloward and Piven, Democrat economists, said, look, the welfare state is not working.
	We're not getting enough people to take up on this in the U.S. to really reset the system the way that we want.
	So let's open it up to foreigners.
	And that will collapse the system.
	But it'll also bring in people who have a, you know, they're poor and they have a dependency mindset and then they're made even more dependent.
	It's a way of importing communism.
	Where everybody depends on the government for housing and for food and all the rest of stuff.
	A family of four in New York could be provided nearly $1,000 each month.
	$1,000 a month, if you remember Andrew Yang, when he was running for president in 2020, I almost got an interview with him, but I had unfortunately talked about universal basic income too much prior to getting an interview with him.
	That was his initial issue.
	And we had the interview scheduled and he canceled it at the last minute.
	He figured out where I was coming from.
	He didn't want to be challenged on that.
	But $1,000 a month was what he was suggesting that people get.
	This is now what New York City is going to give to a family of $4,000 a month.
	It is a way of bringing in universal basic income, not through the back door, but through the southern border.
	And so cards will get refilled every 28 days.
	So get your ID, get your CBDC, and this is a way they're going to usher in CBDC as well.
	To people who are poor and dependent on the government, just take the number, take the card, get your digital currency, and we'll give you housing and food and medical care and things like that.
	Because you're helpless at that point.
	So, will the illegals have a problem with the government confiscating your land?
	No. No, they won't.
	They're going to come in, they're going to be dependent on the government, and, you know, they're coming in to, as far as they're concerned, these people want to take anything they can get.
	They're not going to have a problem with the government stealing people's land.
	Or stealing any of your other possessions.
	Just make sure that you cut them in on it, right?
	That's the big part of the problem.
	And when you look at the American dream...
	Versus the dreamers.
	The dreamers coming from all over the world who just want a free education at our expense with taxes that make our housing more and more expensive.
	Whether you're trying to buy a house or whether you are renting your residence, that means that you cannot afford as much of a house as you did before because you've got to build all these schools for all the dreamers who are coming in.
	So forget about your American dream of having a home.
	That's what this is all about.
	About the taxes and about the debt that's being put on Americans for their dreams.
	And of course, Trump would not stop that.
	The Obama administration said, we're not going to enforce the law.
	He said, well, I can't do anything about that.
	That was an executive order from Obama.
	California bill would give unemployment benefits to illegal immigrants.
	And as of January 1st this year, illegal immigrants in California started getting medical care.
	It's going to cost them more than $4 billion a year.
	And as they say in this article on Zero Hedge, they said three years ago, they were flush with cash.
	But they don't tell you how they got flush with cash.
	You see, four years ago before the so-called pandemic and before Trump released the money with that executive order, and that's what that executive order was about.
	There had already been one at the end of January by his big pharmaceutical head of HHS, Alex Azar, who was the CEO of Eli Lilly that he put in.
	That was really about, you know, oh, there's a pandemic out here.
	And that was at the end of January.
	Was anybody dying, even in China, really?
	No. No. But he put that in.
	And then in March, March the 13th, Trump put in the executive order to release the money.
	Now, California was tens of billions of dollars in debt.
	And then the money was released to them.
	And they wound up flush with cash.
	They had, at the time that they passed this law that just went into effect this January, they had a $100 billion surplus.
	They went from being in debt, tens of billions of dollars, to a $100 billion surplus.
	Now, it didn't take Newsom long to run through it.
	And they are already looking at a $38 billion deficit again.
	But when they were flush with cash and had just won the lottery from Trump over the pandemic stuff, that's when they passed this law and said in three years they're going to give free medical care to everybody in California, including illegal immigrants.
	And so now they're looking at the next thing.
	Now they've introduced a bill.
	To give unemployment insurance to anybody that comes across the border.
	And that will take place, again, three years down the road.
	And January 1st, 2027.
	That Senate bill would give unemployment benefits to illegal aliens, according to the analysis by the Assembly Appropriations Committee this bill establishes until January 1, 2027, upon appropriation by the legislature and so forth, to provide income assistance to workers ineligible for unemployment insurance benefits.
	Again, you can come right over the border.
	I don't have a job. Let me collect $300 a month, which is more than the average working person would make in the states that they're coming from, in Central and South America, or in Africa, or wherever people are coming from.
	So again, they're looking at a deficit of tens of billions.
	Trump gives them COVID cash.
	They've got a surplus of $100 billion.
	They create this medical welfare, health insurance for everybody.
	And I imagine the reason they did that one at that time was because if anybody called them on it, wait a minute, this is for COVID. Well, we're doing health care, right?
	No, they're doing welfare.
	And it's the big welfare magnet, and it just keeps us circling the drain.
	And at the same time, the people who've been administering this unemployment that's going to kick in three years from now, they are full of fraud.
	Giving unemployment benefits to illegal aliens will make the EDD system, that's the Employment Development Department, even more right for fraud than it already is.
	They have long existing fraud problems there in California.
	According to the U.S. Department of Labor, as of January the 24th, the EDD in California still owes the federal government $20 billion that they borrowed to pay for the massive fraud committed on its system during the lockdowns of 2020 with COVID. You see, we got all these people like Tim Pool.
	Don't talk to me about Trump in 2020 and the lockdown.
	I don't want to hear about the lockdown. I don't want to hear about the vaccine.
	That was four years ago. He did a thing, said Tim Pool.
	Well, he did a thing, and those things are still festering and haunting us.
	Trump's war on capitalism, as David Stockton put it, was not just on capitalism.
	It was on our rights.
	It was on the Constitution.
	And it was financial.
	And he funded, he gave this money to people like Newsom, who would run this stuff through.
	In Washington State, similar thing.
	$340 million of COVID money is now going to illegal immigrants.
	But, you know, Trump didn't do the wall because Congress said they wouldn't let him.
	But he was able to release hundreds of billions of dollars, trillions of dollars.
	And, you know, Congress was on board with all of that, but he did his executive order without them.
	A recent report said Washington State used federal coronavirus money to give, wait for it, $1,000 checks.
	You see how this all rhymes?
	New York City, we'll give you $1,000.
	You have Andrew Yang, universal basic income.
	By the way, Andrew Yang was getting, in the early days, all of his money from Elon Musk.
	Elon Musk and the Silicon Valley billionaires love universal basic income.
	And where did Andrew Yang go after that, right?
	That was originally his only issue.
	But then as he started to get attention, he started branching out into other things.
	And one of the things that he wants to do is to put the federal government in charge of all zoning in order to eliminate all zoning.
	You know, you put the federal government in charge of the border to eliminate the border.
	You put the federal government in charge of zoning to eliminate all local zoning.
	Which would allow them to destroy people's values in their homes, to go out into rural and suburban areas and build massive housing projects, to bring the same kind of crime and corruption and waste that they have in the cities everywhere.
	But $1,000 checks, this to illegal aliens.
	They did that during the pandemic.
	The organization stayed on Friday in its report titled, Bidenomics Slush Fund Subsidies, Undocumented Immigration.
	This was the Economic Policy Innovation Center.
	That acronym is EPIC. They said the Biden administration approved $340 million in money for cash payments, but they said that was done in April of 2021.
	So this whole article is about what Biden did, because this is coming from Breitbart.
	And yes, Biden released another $340 million, but buried in here that you can infer, you can see that, of course, the COVID cash stuff did not start with Biden.
	It started with Trump. In April of 2021, the Washington state legislature approved an additional $340 million.
	For another round of funding for undocumented Washingtonians.
	So this is additional, and that is in April.
	So who did the first round?
	Yeah, Donald Trump did.
	He gave the first round to the illegal aliens.
	In May of 2020, who was president then?
	Yeah. Breitbart News reported that Washington State University was trying to provide emergency funds for illegals who were students of the campus amid the pandemic.
	But they won't report who was president then.
	I can't remember. Do you remember who was president?
	Yeah, that's right. It was Donnie, wasn't it?
	So when we look at where we are with the border and we look at how manic they are about getting an ID for everybody, you know, Ted Cruz wants to have special escorts to get him through the airport so he doesn't have to deal with a hoi polloi, right?
	And he doesn't, or maybe the security risk of bunching everybody up at a checkpoint.
	But even as this is happening, even as the Homeland Security is planning to steal more and more biometric information from us, because they just can't get enough of it, and they can't get enough of it in different ways.
	I mean, they're stealing it at the Department of Motor Vehicles.
	They're going to steal it at TSA. Isn't it interesting that they're always trying to get your ID at places where you're trying to move or travel?
	And so this is going to be rolling out at all the airports, but what is happening at the airports with the illegal aliens?
	Well, the Daily Caller reported a state representative, Republican State Representative Senator Cotton Moore in Georgia, was told by some whistleblowers that there was a lot of trafficking going on of illegal aliens to the Atlanta airport.
	So he heard about a hidden room full of migrants from a whistleblower who worked at the airport.
	So he went there with a video camera.
	He noticed an influx of illegal immigrants who were coming into the facility in recent months.
	In the video, there appears to be a uniformed soldier guarding a room full of migrants and volunteers with a group called Team Libertad, which boasts of helping migrants travel on its social media accounts.
	And so as he's trying to get information from them, at first they're very open about, oh yeah, yeah, these are illegal aliens and we're bringing them in and all that kind of stuff.
	And then he decides that he's going to take pictures of them.
	That's when they start getting really horsey with this state representative.
	They said, these are just recently documented travelers.
	Recently documented. Getting released from ICE, Immigration Customs.
	Getting to where they need to be.
	Getting to where they need to be.
	Where would that be? Back home?
	Where they came from? No, no.
	There's people that they just get dropped off here from ICE, and they don't have any help.
	So we're Team Libertad, and we're going to help them.
	Oh, don't you take any pictures of us?
	And he did take pictures, and you can see uniformed people were involved in it.
	Yeah, this is an active program.
	It's not like Biden can't do anything about the border.
	Because you've got to wait for Congress.
	It's not like Biden can't do anything because of his staff.
	This is something that has gone through both of these administrations.
	They're facilitating this stuff on a regular basis.
	And we know what the purpose is.
	We'll be right back. Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
	From country to blues, classic hits to news, APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
	Get details at APSRadio.com.
	♪♪
	Liberty. It's your move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	And Rumble, revered to the end, says, thank you for the tip.
	He says, if they're showing you, they've had it for a long time.
	Just saying. Yeah, that's right.
	That's right. When we look at the little micro devices and all the rest of the stuff, think how long they've been planning to do this stuff.
	You know, it takes a while to make these technological advances.
	It takes a lot of money coming from DARPA and the federal government to do this kind of stuff.
	They've been planning this for a very long time.
	They've been planning the control through the internet for a very long time as well.
	Going back to the 1960s, you had J.C.R. Licklider, who was a psychologist working for DARPA. He came up with the idea of the Internet.
	He called at the time the Intergalactic Computer Network.
	They shortened it up to Internet.
	And, of course, the first Internets that were out there were DARPAnet and ARPANET, and they were associated with the intelligence and defense communities.
	But it was a psychological move to be able to manipulate people and to monitor people.
	Let's talk about ammunition, though, in the Second Amendment.
	We have Washington State Democrats are now saying that ammunition is a privilege.
	And because it's a privilege, it needs to be taxed, of course.
	So, the first month of the Washington legislature's state session is ending with a slew of Democrat-backed gun control proposals, most of them coming from one legislator who used to work with Gabby Giffords.
	A lot of new measures to tax people to control them to turn rights into government-granted privileges.
	And, of course, the privilege of using ammunition.
	So the 11% tax is what that is about.
	In addition to any other federal or state or local sales taxes, they would add an 11% surcharge across the state.
	It is, instead of recognizing the purchase of ammunition as a part of the Second Amendment, the language of the bill classifies it as a privilege.
	This is what the bill says.
	A use tax is levied on every person in this state for the privilege of using ammunition as a consumer at the rate of 11% of the selling price.
	That's the bill. You see, the...
	The Democrats got wise to this a while ago.
	I knew we were in trouble when, during the Obama administration, they started shutting down the resale of spent brass from the military, specifically Fort Drummond, New York.
	And they said, well, rather than selling this spent brass to some commercial people who are going to reuse it and reload it, we don't want that to happen.
	We want to make ammunition more expensive.
	And so they crushed the brass and sold it to China, which means that they make a lot less money for that than they would if they were to sell the spent brass shell casings.
	But their goal was it doesn't matter.
	The money doesn't matter to them. They just print out more of it at the Federal Reserve.
	Some senators got a hold of that and they started changing that, but it's been about the ammunition.
	They're coming after the ammunition in many different ways because if you don't have that, you basically have a club instead of a gun.
	So, the stated reason is to help to reduce gun violence.
	Zero Hedge points out, however, in 2021, 69% of all firearm-related deaths were suicide.
	Do you think people care about 11% tax if they want to commit suicide?
	Not going to be much of a deterrence, is it?
	And so I guess they want death by taxes instead of death and taxes?
	I don't know. Maybe when they look at 69% of these deaths being suicides, maybe they ought to look at their lockdown policies and their deliberate policies of isolation.
	That were the center point of Trump's lockdown.
	The globalist lockdown. Let's just call it that.
	That he implemented. So the gun control advocate who's now in the Washington legislature is a Ms.
	Berry. She used to work for Gabby Giffords.
	She has introduced at least five other measures to target guns in addition to this tax.
	Proposals that would require Anybody who buys a gun in Washington to go through all of the rigmarole and licensing and everything else that somebody who's trying to get a concealed handgun permit would have to go through.
	Make all those burdens on somebody, even if they just buy a gun.
	And of course, firearm dealers would have to review and respond to any requests that they get from the government regulating them.
	Within 24 hours, they'd have to report the loss or theft of a weapon.
	To the authorities within 24 hours.
	They would have to file annual reports to the state attorney general's office.
	And we know what all this is about.
	The Biden administration has been shutting down gun dealers left and right Even people in the ATF were complaining about this.
	They said in the past, these petty violations that they're taking people's federal firearms license for, in the past they would simply get maybe a reprimand or they would get a fine if they had several of them.
	Instead, now, the very first infraction, no matter how minor, they take their ability to do business as a gun dealer.
	They take it away.
	That's what they're trying to do with this.
	Set up all kinds of reporting requirements and then take it away.
	It would also prohibit gun dealers from selling or transferring more than one firearm to an individual within a 30-day window.
	Right now there is no cap on the number of firearms a dealer can sell or transfer to an individual at any given time.
	Victims of firearm theft must report the missing weapon within 24 hours after they become aware of the loss of the weapon.
	And they would have to include in their report detailed information about the weapon, including the caliber of the make, the model, the serial number, and the manufacturer.
	Right now, they have five days to report a gun theft, and it's not as detailed.
	But if you don't do that...
	They can charge you for community endangerment if your gun is used for any nefarious purposes.
	So, in the House, you have Republicans are putting pressure on Mike Johnson to not reauthorize a bill that goes back to the 1980s.
	The reauthorization of perhaps the dumbest gun control measure humanly possible.
	The Undetectable Firearms Act is up for reauthorization.
	This is something that got put in in 1988, and it banned the manufacture, the sale, or the importation of any firearm that isn't detectable by a doorframe metal detector or other security technology.
	Now, they put this together in 1988.
	They were concerned about the fact that Glock was using polymer construction for the body.
	But the problem was, and they all freaked out about that, and so they said, well, we've got to have this Undetectable Firearms Act, and they put it in in 1988.
	It didn't ban any guns.
	Because even though they had a polymer body encasing, they still had all these metal parts inside of it.
	They got a steel slide, they got a steel barrel, internal mechanisms, magazines, springs, all the rest of this stuff.
	I guess also ammunition.
	All that metal stuff inside there, they were easily detectable.
	And so now, this bill comes up for reauthorization on a regular basis.
	And always in the past, you'd have one or two people would push back against this.
	People like Thomas Massey in the past.
	But this time they got a group of nearly 75 Republican members who are demanding that Speaker Johnson oppose the reauthorization of this useless thing.
	Andy Ogles of Tennessee and Thomas Mathsey of Kentucky are the two who led this effort, and they got 75 signatures on it.
	They said in their letter, the Biden administration has already demonstrated its ability to weaponize the Undetectable Firearms Act into a widespread plastic gun ban.
	Congress must not permanently reauthorize this law, especially while ATS' final definition of what a frame or a receiver is is still being considered in the courts.
	See how...
	How they do this, you know, they're redefining what a dealer is.
	They're redefining what a frame is.
	They're redefining what a receiver is.
	They're redefining this and that because that's how they are able to extend the law into areas that they never intended it to be.
	We're going to prohibit X. Well, let's call, I want to prohibit Y, so let's call Y X also, that type of thing.
	No firearms have ever met the criteria of this undetectable firearm.
	Again, they were freaked out about Glocks, but they're easily detected.
	It has to be reauthorized every five or ten years.
	Their last reauthorization was in 2013.
	So I guess they started extending...
	The reauthorization period from the initial 5, they extended it to 10.
	Gun Owners of America has been fighting this since it was enacted in 1988.
	And they say since then, there have been many pro-gun members of Congress who were silent as this was authorized and reauthorized by voice votes and by unanimous consent.
	You know, the same way that they wanted to do the trillions of dollars for all the COVID stuff.
	Remember that? And it's the same guy, Thomas Massey, who said, nope, we're going to come back and we're going to have a vote on that at Congress.
	And they were so angry about that.
	That's when Trump said, we've got to get him out of Congress.
	We've got to primary Thomas Massey out, said Trump.
	And so when this bill, same thing with this bill, they would always just use voice votes and pretend that they had unanimous consent.
	When it was last reauthorized in 2013, Thomas Massey was the only voice that shouted, nay, nay.
	But he didn't even have even a fifth of a quorum there to back him, which is required to demand a recorded vote.
	This time, 73 members of Congress have his back with this letter, says Gun Owners of America.
	So we will see what happens with it.
	But before we get away from the gun stuff, this is just another area where we need to take a look at The difference between what people say and what they do.
	As a matter of fact, somebody posted this this weekend.
	Slide that over a little bit to the side there, Travis.
	Trump's record on the Second Amendment...
	He banned bump stocks.
	He signed the Fix NICS to expand Prohibited Persons Faulty Database.
	He supported red flag gun confiscation.
	Date the gun, do the new process later.
	He supported raising the minimum age to purchase firearms.
	He told British TV he was going to seriously look at banning suppressors and ignored legislation to deregulate suppressors.
	He supports the TAPS Act.
	A Big Brother social media monitoring of firearm statements.
	He supported expanding background checks and registration with the Toomey Mansion Act.
	He quipped about wanting to terminate parts of the Constitution, quote-unquote.
	He told Senator Feinstein, include the assault weapons ban in the school safety bill.
	Yeah, and there's a picture of him with a grinning, giggling smile.
	Dianne Feinstein, setting it aside as he made that famous statement, take the guns and do the due process later.
	Do you really think that he's on our side?
	Is it better to know the person who is your enemy than to be stabbed in the back by somebody who's actually working for the globalists for the Davos Agenda?
	We'll be right back. Decoding
	the mainstream propaganda.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	Looking for better information?
	APSRadioNews.com features articles and commentary, along with audio from all the top news from around the world.
	APSRadioNews.com Let's take a look at the fallout from the people who resisted.
	The lockdowns, who resisted the vaccine passports and the rest of the stuff.
	They're still trying to take revenge on those people, just like they did the January of the Sixers.
	And those of us who talk about it are still under bans, both financial as well as social media.
	The hounding of a lawyer in the UK who dared to challenge the vaccine.
	And there's more to this story than just the revenge and recrimination of somebody who exposed what was being done by the conservative government in the UK. As I said before, it doesn't matter what the political basis of this, whether they call themselves socialists or communists or conservatives or libertarians or liberals, which is what in Australia they would call libertarians.
	Janice Berejiklian there, one of the most authoritarian of the people, not quite as bad, I guess, as Dan Andrews, but she was part of the Liberal Party, which is what they call the Libertarian Party there.
	No respect for individual liberty.
	And, of course, the conservatives in the UK did not want to conserve any of the hard-won protections against tyranny.
	They overturned them one after the other.
	You got Trudeau in Canada, Trump in the U.S., all of them doing the same thing at the same time.
	It's like they're all working for Klaus Schwab, isn't it?
	Well, actually, there are some connections with that, with this particular case.
	Those who raise the alarm, this is coming from conservativewomen.co.uk.
	Those who raise the alarm continue to be punished and pursued.
	A solicitor, Lois Bayless, was so concerned after she read that the UK's four chief medical officers had overruled expert advice made by the Joint Committee on Vaccination.
	They had advice not to vaccinate healthy children.
	And then the four chief medical officers overruled that committee.
	The committee said, don't vaccinate healthy children.
	They said, no, we're going to do it anyway.
	Four people at the top.
	So she decided to warn schools and vaccination centers about potential harms and their legal duty to provide what?
	Informed consent.
	She felt very strongly, like many others, that experimental mRNA vaccines.
	Again, this is not a weakened or dead virus.
	This is a genetic code being injected.
	I hope you all know that, in spite of the misinformation and the lies that Alex Jones was telling people at the time.
	They had no business being injected into children.
	For this, she was reported to an agency called the Solicitor's Regulation Authority.
	Several complainants, including the Department of Health and Social Care and the Chief Constable for the South Yorkshire Police.
	Now, this organization, the SRA, the Solicitors Regulation Authority, this is a group of lawyers.
	This is a group of lawyers coming after this lawyer because she said, you need to tell people that they have informed consent and you need to warn them.
	Because, look, even this joint committee on vaccination says healthy children shouldn't be getting this shot.
	But you've got four people above them saying, no, we're going to do it anyway.
	And so this group of lawyers, the SRA, have received over one million pounds from the World Economic Forum since 2019, and they got on it right away.
	Isn't that interesting?
	The World Economic Forum...
	Was giving vast amounts of money, and this is a lot of money, you know, it's more money when you're looking at it in the UK than it is here, because smaller country, they don't deal in a smaller economy, they don't deal in the ridiculously astronomical numbers that we deal with.
	But a million pounds is a lot of money to anybody.
	And so this organization had gotten a million dollars from the World Economic Forum since 2019, and And they came after her with a vengeance.
	They launched an investigation, said there would be a disciplinary tribunal on February the 12th.
	They scheduled this to last for four days, and even if she wins and clears her name, they have the right to claim their costs, which they estimate to be over 90,000 pounds.
	I don't know how that works.
	But even if she defends herself successfully, they will come after her for legal fees.
	This legal organization will hit her up for legal fees of 90,000 pounds to punish her.
	Why? What did she do?
	She warned healthy children not to take the vaccine, agreeing with the vaccine committee.
	The SRA will do anything to prove their case, including changing the nature of their allegations.
	This group of lawyers, given a million pounds by Davos, After she responded to them, not relying on the original complaints to build their case and removing thousands of pages of supported evidence sent by medical experts from around the world, then they also changed crucial wording to make letters of warning that she sent to schools sound more threatening.
	For example, she stated to the schools that the recipients could be liable to criminal prosecution But alleges that the SRA's own solicitors change this to read would be liable through criminal prosecution.
	So when I look at this, everybody is concerned, and we should be concerned about the abuse of the law, lawfare and things like that, and we should be concerned about it being done against Trump.
	But he ignores this.
	He doesn't care about this.
	This is so much more important, really.
	They're doing this to all of, and I say it's more important because nobody cares or pays attention when it happens to anyone other than to Trump.
	It's just like the swatting that happened.
	Nobody cares if children have flashbang grenades thrown into their cribs or people are shot dead when they get no-knock SWAT team raids.
	And the politicians, when they get pranked and swatted with this stuff, And there was a teenager that was doing a bunch of these SWATs, a 17-year-old teenager who was calling in these SWAT things.
	All they want to do is punish a teenager like that.
	They don't want to stop this SWAT team procedure.
	And we don't need to have a SWAT team procedure.
	There's nothing more antithetical to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and U.S. tradition than to have a SWAT team.
	There's no place for a SWAT team.
	If you don't have a SWAT team, then you can't get SWATed.
	But they don't want to address the real issue.
	They just want to protect themselves as very important people.
	For example, when we talk about the difference of things that are happening to Trump and things that are happening to other people, this guy, Alvin Bragg, the district attorney in Manhattan, Coming after Trump with some of these trumped-up charges.
	He is now also coming after people who had fake vaccine cards, trying to get out of these mandates.
	And the New York Post says that as he brought these cases, a judge blasted the Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg for trying to throw the book at two New Yorkers who bought fake COVID-19 vaccine cards.
	Despite routinely going easy on others who are charged with far more serious crimes, like, for example, what he's doing right now.
	We've had a video that was out last week, and I don't like to show pictures of crimes being committed, people being shot, people being beaten.
	In this particular case, it was a gang of illegal immigrants beating some police officers.
	They got them on the ground, everybody's taking a turn kicking them and all the rest of the stuff.
	Alvin Bragg doesn't care about prosecuting them.
	He's going to let them go, but he wants to throw the book at people who faked a vaccine card so they wouldn't have to take the deadly Trump shot.
	That is not sugar water, Alex.
	In a ruling issued this week, state Supreme Court Justice Brendan Lantry dismissed felony Felony charges.
	Brought against a couple of people who were not publicly identified, the judge called the case overkill.
	One of them was a nursing student.
	Another one was an employee with the City Department of Environmental Protection.
	So, an employee of the city.
	Another one is a nursing student.
	And again, this type of coercion doesn't come from a mandate.
	It comes from Trump giving money to the hospitals and then Biden saying, we're going to remove that money and the other money as well.
	If you don't vaccinate everybody, it's always done through the money.
	And the money flow began with Trump.
	Same thing with the governors who are getting the money.
	You're going to get more money if you keep this pandemic going.
	So keep it going.
	So one of them, a nursing student, the other one working for the city.
	Among hundreds, hundreds that were accused of buying fake vaccination cards from a New Jersey stripper, Maybe you would want to, if you're going to do one of these things, you better do it really good.
	Don't buy it off of a stripper.
	The two are among just 16 people that Bragg's office cherry-picked to prosecute, because what he's trying to do is he's trying to set up, if he can get some of these people convicted, then he can go after the hundreds of people who bought it from just this one person.
	He charged them a felony criminal possession of a forged instrument.
	The judge said this is ridiculous overcharging and shut him down.
	But again, this is the same district attorney who is coming after Trump.
	And when DeSantis gave his presentation about CBDC early on, when most people were not talking about it, called it Big Brother Digital Money, gave a 20-minute presentation about how it could be used to create hell on earth.
	Total surveillance and control.
	The response from the first reporter's question was, but what about Trump and Alvin Bragg in Manhattan?
	By the way, like I said, he released these New York Police Department cop attackers.
	His excuse was he said, well, we can't identify them.
	They got video of this all over the place.
	We've been talking about how the government surveils everything.
	He's got cameras everywhere. Do you believe for a moment that he doesn't have sufficient video to identify these people?
	I think, I don't believe that.
	I think they've identified them as illegal aliens, and so he doesn't want to do anything about it.
	But he'll throw the book, felony charges, at people who had an ID so they didn't have to get the vaccine mandates that all the officials, state and local, were being bribed to enforce.
	So they beat up two New York Police Department officers.
	He released them without bail, saying he could not conclusively identify each defendant.
	Even New York Governor Kathy Hochul disagreed with him and told the reporters, get them all and send them back.
	Well, there you go.
	But, of course, we've heard tough talk about the border from Democrats in the past, haven't we?
	And then this was sent to me by a listener.
	Michael, thank you for saying this.
	Florida grand jury on COVID came out with their first report.
	It confirms everything that you've always said, he said.
	This is something that was convened by DeSantis.
	And they did an investigation.
	They came up with a report.
	And so it talks about safety, efficacy, talks about infection risk, symptomatic infection risk, hospitalization risk, death risk, and of course we know how this all goes.
	There wasn't sufficient transmission or infection risk or death risk for any of these things.
	It talks about pandemic modeling and non-pharmaceutical interventions, the lockdowns, the stay-at-home orders, the collateral consequences, the use of masks and social distancing.
	And so here's their conclusion. I'll read you just a little bit of their conclusion.
	They say that it takes a little bit of time for this thing sometimes.
	So the first thing they say in their conclusion is, how did these non-pharmaceutical interventions affect the overall risk presented by the SARS-CoV-2 virus?
	Wrong question.
	Wrong question.
	See, it's not how did this work.
	Did it work or did it not work?
	The real question is, where did they get these ideas?
	These ideas are so patently absurd, we knew they were not going to work.
	As a matter of fact, things like the mask had already been debunked back in 2002.
	When they first said, we've got a SARS virus, and it's in Asia, and the Asian people started wearing masks and everything...
	They knew at the time that it was total nonsense.
	And you had in New South Wales, I've talked about this many times, the woman, the scientist who discovered the parvovirus did a test and she said, the N95 masks are totally ineffective against this stuff.
	And, you know, most of any of the airborne stuff is going to pass right through the mask.
	It's not small enough to stop it.
	And so if you think you're going to stop, use these masks to stop airborne particles of spittle and things like that.
	She said after 20 minutes of use, it's actually counterproductive because the mask gets saturated.
	And then the pressure of your speaking and voice and breathing and things like that will make smaller particles that will travel farther and stay airborne longer.
	So the question is not, how did these interventions work?
	We had known decades before that they don't work.
	The question is, where did this six-foot distance come from?
	Where did this idea of a lockdown come from?
	Well, I know where the idea of a lockdown came from.
	It came from their dark winter CIA simulations that began two months before 9-11.
	So we know where that came from.
	We know where the six-foot distance came from, supposedly from some kid's high school project.
	Her dad worked for Sandia Labs and that type of thing.
	But I think it was very effective for surveillance.
	You know, you spread people out six feet apart.
	You can get good pictures of them.
	And you needed good pictures of them to be able to identify their gait.
	If you had put a mask on their face, you couldn't do the facial recognition as well.
	So we're going to have to use some other form of identification.
	How do they move?
	And if you know how they move, you can identify people just as easily by their movements as you can by their face.
	So the question is, where did these things come from?
	Not how did they work.
	They're not even asking the right question, unfortunately.
	They just looked at the efficacy of these things.
	None of these things worked. They were never intended to work because the pandemic was not about disease.
	It was not about medicine.
	It was about political power.
	Always was. Always has been.
	It was about control. They didn't, in this report, address anything about the hospital death protocols.
	About the ventilators and remdesivir being forced on people, about the banning of anything else, even the off-label use of drugs that have been approved and in use for 60, 70 years.
	None of that. They didn't talk about the financial incentivization, the bonuses, the bribery that was done everywhere.
	So this is the first of the inquiries, and again, it is insufficient.
	And it's going to be left up to us To do those people who've been injured, who have lost loved ones, it's going to be up to them to do lawsuits.
	And we've already seen some good results.
	As reported last week, the 15th of January, there was a positive result in Australia.
	The decision that was handed down there said that a guy who was forced to do it, working for the state, The state didn't deny that the vaccine had injured them.
	They just denied any responsibility for it.
	And they said, well, if you force them to do it, you're responsible.
	And that's the key.
	They foresaw with the PrEP Act, again, goes back to 2001 under George Bush and the CIA, did the dark winter stuff and the model legislation that went out.
	And then in 2005, they passed the PrEP Act to prevent the vaccine companies from being sued.
	But everybody else that was twisting arms and coercing people to get this done, everybody else is up for grabs, folks.
	You can go after the hospital.
	You can go after the employer that kicked you out.
	Anybody that harmed you.
	Nobody except for the vaccine companies themselves are protected from any of this stuff.
	And the vaccine companies have jumped the shark on their protection.
	They got so cocky about it.
	That they made fraudulent claims, and so even they can have lawsuits against them for fraud claims.
	And I hope people sue the pants off.
	Keep the lawyers busy.
	If Alvin Bragg wants to sue people for vaccine passport forgery and he wants to come after Donald Trump, give the lawyers something productive to do.
	Go after all the people that were a part of this, including the vaccine companies who made egregious, fraudulent claims about safety and efficacy.
	That is well documented.
	Now, they were lying to people telling them it was nearly 100% all through this.
	You got the press that was lying to people about that.
	Sue everybody over this because none of these people are going to accept any responsibility for the harm that they've done.
	And the only way that we're going to get any justice out of this, any kind of compensation out of this injustice, is to sue these people.
	We'll be right back. In
	a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Hear news now at APSRadioNews.com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story.
	Let's talk about food and farming.
	This was sent to me by Mary Ellen Moore with Free Mind Films.
	And it was a tweet from Wall Street Apes.
	And they went into a great deal of depth about new legislation that That would require ear tags, electronic identification for each and every animal.
	Look, whenever they want to identify something, it's always about control and prohibition of that thing.
	Always. Always.
	If they want to go in and identify each and every gun, that was going to be the takeaway for the gunwalker program, which became Fast and Furious.
	They wanted to create a narrative to say, well, we're going to have to tag and trace every gun, every piece of ammunition, and so forth.
	That's what the UN wanted to do with their Small Arms Trade Treaty.
	And so whenever they want to start inventorying everything, that needs to raise all kinds of alarms with people.
	Because the only reason that they want to tag and trace things is because they want to control and prohibit those things.
	So this is a mandatory electronic identification ear tag bill.
	It would allow government and environmental groups who attribute livestock to climate change.
	So this, again, that's part of the climate change nonsense.
	To take our food. We're all going to die if there's CO2 or nitrogen out there.
	No, we're all going to die if you take away the farms and the food.
	That's the reality of this.
	So they want to be able to use this to spy on small farms and cattle.
	Smaller operations will struggle to shoulder the cost of the infrastructure to maintain these systems.
	So the big thing now, writes Wall Street Apes, is the big controversy on the pharma community, the electronic ear tag, the mandatory electronic tag bill that's out there.
	I'm a little bit offended to see some small-time farmers who actually support this.
	It's offended is not the right word.
	Baffled is a better word.
	Never let government control way too much of our food supply already.
	This is unlike any bill that's been put through legislation.
	It's masked with good intentions, but what it really is is a Trojan horse to come in and control the small farmer.
	That's all it is.
	And meant to then put them out of business.
	If you're ever confused about a bill, always say no.
	As a matter of fact, that just came up.
	If you live in Tennessee, and there's a lot of states that are having this, one of the reasons that DeSantis had that CBDC thing was to say, well, There's an effort for the Uniform Commercial Code, the UCC. There's an effort to legalize CBDC as the medium of exchange and money and to make crypto illegal.
	And Christy Noem blew the whistle on that.
	So this is going around to a lot of different places right now.
	I vetoed this.
	It was passed by the legislature, but I vetoed it.
	And so be on the lookout for this.
	Well, DeSantis saw it and he went the other way.
	He said, well, we had the same thing, so we're going to make the UCC code instead of making crypto illegal and CBDC legal.
	We'll make CBDC illegal and we'll legalize crypto.
	But that bill has gone to a lot of different legislatures, especially conservative legislatures.
	And there's one here in Tennessee that came up and people saw through it and they pushed back against it.
	And then they modified it slightly.
	It is now a very large bill.
	Gary Humble of Tennessee Stands did a report on it.
	I contacted, if I remember correctly, I didn't write it down, I think it's State Bill 749.
	And so I contacted Senator Nicely and said, what's going on with this?
	I'm going to stop it. And he goes, this is a really complicated bill.
	But he said the same thing they said about this.
	If you don't really understand what something is and it's complicated, he said, whenever I see something, if it's this complicated, I just automatically vote no.
	So he's a no vote on it, but it's got a lot of people confused about it because they have muddied the water with a tremendous amount of stuff there.
	Catherine Austin Fitz said that she's had her lawyer look at it.
	And I'm not really sure what the dangers are here in terms of it's so complicated.
	It's difficult to get a handle on exactly what they're trying to do.
	But we know that it is trying to pave the way for CBDC. And we know what this bill is doing.
	But anytime you see something that's really complicated, you need to tell your legislators to just walk away from it.
	If government wants more control, it should always be a no.
	But in this, if you're ever confused about the true motivation behind this bill, look who is supporting it.
	Who is supporting this?
	It's big politicians, big government, big corporations who are doing this.
	Thomas Massey is on this federal bill.
	But be on the lookout for local state bills that are still trying to change the UCC. And if you see something that's trying to change the definition of money in the UCC, you know where that's coming from.
	You know, that's coming from this effort to try to bring in CBDC through the back door.
	One of the things that has just come out in terms of food, and by the way, I was talking to them about that.
	Senator Nicely said, you know, he's fought the big agri-companies on the addition of arsenic.
	I was not aware of this.
	They are allowed to feed arsenic to chicken, and when they do that, The chickens gain a lot of weight, and of course they're going to sell the chicken by the weight.
	The problem is that you eat that arsenic, and arsenic is not good for us either.
	The arsenic would eventually kill the chickens, but of course you can fatten them up and sell them out there before they die, and then feed that poison to unsuspecting consumers.
	And that's really what's going on.
	And that's allowed. It's amazing when you look at Big Agra and the chicken companies, how much power they have.
	Back during the Clinton administration, I remember it was, I think it was either Purdue or it was Tyson that was closely connected to the Clinton administration.
	And they were able to change the definition of what fresh versus frozen chicken was all about.
	Because they wanted to be able to distribute to a larger area by freezing the chicken and still calling it fresh chicken.
	They got something pushed through, so it's like as long as the chicken is not frozen for more than 6 or 12 hours or something like that, I forget what the time frame was, but they could freeze it for about a day and it would not be counted as frozen.
	It's frozen. It's frozen for a day.
	It's not fresh chicken.
	It's frozen. But they changed that definition.
	You know, just like the ATF, it wants to change the definition of what a dealer is or change the definition of, you know, what a frame is or anything else like that.
	So they changed the definition of what frozen is.
	Frozen means that it's frozen for X number of hours, not that just in general.
	And so they can get all that stuff pushed through.
	You know, changing the definition of frozen chicken, allowing the chickens to be fed arsenic so they can up the weight.
	And then this, which is even worse.
	He said, you know, they're also able to, for every pound of a chicken, they can inject up to two pounds of salt water.
	And again, to increase the price because they're going to sell you the chicken by the pound.
	They don't miss a trick, do they?
	And they get that done because they can control politicians who push that stuff through.
	So as we're talking about gaining weight, you know, with arsenic and things like that, this came out this weekend as well.
	Glyphosate is a transgenerational obesogen.
	Now, I've never seen those words before, and you probably haven't heard that either.
	Transgenerational means that it takes a couple of generations for this effect to show up.
	You know, it's always difficult to point the finger in the past before we had the Trump shots.
	It's difficult to prove that the vaccines were harming people because it took a while for autism to show up.
	It took a while for some of these other things to show up.
	Usually didn't happen right away until they came out with the warp speed stuff.
	But this one is even worse.
	This doesn't show up in the first exposure, first generation.
	It doesn't show up in the offspring.
	It shows up in the grandkids of the ones who are exposed, if you will.
	And what it does is it makes them fat.
	That's what obesogen means.
	It means it generates obesity.
	But it does it in like two generations down.
	That's how subtle this stuff is.
	So the study authors began with an overview of glyphosate, which is interesting and useful because it gives us some idea where it's been widely used that glyphosate is a safe chemical, they say, for animals and humans.
	But they said the current safe standard set by the EPA for daily chronic reference dose of glyphosate is a fraction of the kilogram of body weight, 1.75 milligrams per kilogram of body weight.
	I said there's no observable effect with that.
	It acts by inhibiting, however, an enzyme that is involved in the metabolism of aromatic amino acids in plants.
	And this is what causes the plants to die.
	However, the absence of this biochemical pathway in animals...
	It is a rapid metabolism and elimination of glyphosate in mammals that has led to the assumption that low levels of toxicity are expected in humans and other animals.
	However, the researchers took female rats and exposed them to glyphosate, and the rats then gave birth to rats that gave birth to further rats and gave birth to yet more rats.
	So there were four generations, and the subsequent generations suffered various negative effects As a result of the initial females' exposure.
	They call them F0. So the first generation.
	What was particularly interesting was that the first generation, the F1 generation, so you expose the females F0. Then the first generation of offspring, F1, did not manifest these negative effects.
	It was only in subsequent generations that they appeared.
	the effects actually became worse with each new generation.
	They discovered large numbers of epigenetic changes, that is, inheritable changes that don't involve changes to the DNA. They found it in the sperm in particular, such as changes to DNA methylation processes. They said there's now a growing body of work on how epigenetic change can have profound effects on offspring, including
	the transmission of illness and obesity, including sperm effects, to sterilize.
	You see, we see all of these different things that are being done to our food.
	And we see how the testing is inadequate for years before all this warp speed stuff came out.
	Del Bigtree with HiWire and Icon.
	They had showed clips of international meetings of the international health experts who talked about vaccines.
	And you had several scientists who were saying, you know, we're just not running our tests long enough to see if they're safe.
	We've got a lot of these health effects that are showing up many years after we stop looking, but they're showing up.
	And we need to extend the amount of time that we're doing the testing.
	Instead, they went exactly the opposite direction.
	And even though they went the opposite direction and suspended all testing and just skipped it so they could get this stuff out in a few months, we then saw the harm accelerate even faster.
	But when you look at what is happening in our society, the obesity that has become epidemic, It is not simply the stuff that we're eating.
	It's not simply the high fructose corn syrup and other things like that.
	It is also the glyphosate that has now permeated pretty much all of the food supply.
	And it's something that doesn't show up even in the first generation.
	It's something that gradually comes out.
	So as all this is happening, You've got the BBC Radio is now attacking the farmers, trying to stifle them.
	Again, same thing that we're seeing in Germany, identifying them.
	This is the tactic they're going to take.
	Anybody who opposes the government's narrative, anybody who opposes the government's economic program, anybody who opposes the government's push to have total control of food and food distribution, you're the conspiracist.
	These people have been conspiring to do this stuff for decades.
	So, once again, the same procedure is being done in the BBC that was being done in Germany with money coming from the usual suspects, Pierre Midiar and World Economic Forum.
	On Rockfin, Doug Lug, thank you very much for the tip, and he thanks us.
	And, again, another very familiar name.
	Thank you so much for your support, folks.
	Please like the stream as well as the channel.
	That helps us to get visibility.
	It is extremely hard to get visibility when you're pushing against the narrative.
	And I think we've got a limited window here where we can actually get this information out.
	People are waking up very quickly, but it's a race to try to get this out there.
	So we appreciate you liking the stream.
	It's one very important way to support us that doesn't really cost you anything.
	And of course, we also appreciate your prayers.
	That is a very important thing.
	We look to God as our ultimate provider, but we thank all of you for your support.
	Have a good day. The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲