Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 6, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:56

The David Knight Show - 02/06/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	At the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 6th of February, Year of Our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to begin by talking about 5G health hazards.
	There's an excellent expose that is beginning on this.
	We'll also talk about the long con.
	You know, we've got long COVID, don't we?
	Well, we've also got a very long con.
	That is being run. And of course, whenever you do a confidence game, a con game, you've got to get people's confidence.
	And so a lot of these people who were really not there with us are trying to regain your confidence.
	We're going to talk about that.
	We also have joining us today Davis Yance, the Christian attorney who was involved in the fight of the Navy SEALs.
	They've now done a documentary about it.
	It's called SEALs Beat Biden.
	I'm sure we would all want to see that.
	But he's also going to be talking to us about the FACE Act.
	The FACE Act, where they are sending people to jail more than a decade for peacefully protesting abortion at these murder clinics.
	We'll be right back. Well, I want to begin with 5G health hazards.
	It's interesting to me that When you talk about the health issues, when you talk about the surveillance issues, both of those, both of those are dismissed as conspiracy theories.
	There's nothing to be concerned about with 5G, right?
	Well, it's harder to prove.
	It's very obvious what the surveillance issues are with it.
	I mean, just take a look during the Trump administration, the mania of all of government, including Trump, to say, well, we don't want the Chinese to set up this 5G thing because they'll be spying on us.
	Well, they know that because they'll be spying on us with the 5G. So it's a, who gets to spy on us fight?
	Spy versus spy.
	And it is like Mad Magazine, isn't it?
	But there's really no question, and they even admit it tacitly, even though they poo-poo the idea that they would ever use 5G to determine where you are and make you a suspect based on where you are, like they did on January the 6th, or to profile people based on their religious and political beliefs and that type of thing.
	God, they'd never do that. They'll do that and much, much more.
	But the health effects are more difficult to prove.
	So this is an article from State of the Nation.
	You can also find it on theburningplatform.com.
	Radio frequency. Microwave and millimeter wave engineer explains the science behind the propagation of 5G into the human body and offers mitigation advice.
	That's the key thing, too. This is not just about the effects that it has.
	But it's also about propagation into the body.
	And on the Burning Platform, they write a note before this article that said, our readership's been waiting for this conclusive expose since the nationwide 5G rollout was first announced years ago.
	Truly, it doesn't get any more compelling and authoritative than these revelations about 5G and how it really affects the human body.
	And so the engineer writes, this scientific breakdown...
	He's only the first in the series of highly consequential disclosures made.
	And I'm sorry, they wrote that about the Deep Insider.
	He is a credentialed radio frequency, microwave, millimeter wave engineer.
	He has 25 plus years of experience.
	And so he talks about what the RF frequencies are about, about where they are, talks about the difference of wavelengths.
	He talks about how to mitigate some of this stuff.
	And how sometimes maybe some of your mitigation attempts might actually exacerbate this.
	He says, before we begin, take a look at 5G, 5th generation.
	1G deployed in the 1980s.
	Old school phones that only the very wealthy people had.
	I remember when we had...
	The video store is in the 1980s, and we were laughing about it because some lady pulled up, and we had a Dropbox, but a lot of them would want to turn it in by hand, so sometimes a double park.
	In many instances, the police would be there and immediately give them a ticket, even though there wasn't anything busy about it, even if they left their motorized.
	So she pulls up, and she uses the phone to call us and says, I'm parked outside.
	Can you come and get the video?
	It's like, well, okay.
	And we were all laughing about it.
	It's like, she's so rich, she can make a phone call to tell us to walk that far.
	She doesn't want to get out of her car and walk in.
	Because at that time, it cost a couple of dollars to make that phone call, which is the price of the entire video rental.
	It was kind of crazy in terms of the economics.
	But that's the way that it was at the very beginning.
	It's easy to forget that because these things have become ubiquitous and very cheap relatively.
	He says these phones are about 6x6x12, plus or minus a few inches.
	Many of the people who use these phones had a region in their brain the size of a walnut that had been literally cooked.
	He says 2G came after that.
	3G is the old school flip phones of the early 2000s.
	Then you had 4G and 4G LTE. 5G is the next generation rolling out worldwide.
	And to compare the bandwidth, he says 4G LTE offers tens of megabits per second.
	Whereas 5G offers hundreds of megabits per second into the gigabits per second.
	So it's going to be 10 to 100 times faster, essentially.
	There are multiple variants of 5G being deployed around the world.
	5G in China has data encoded on the 28 gigahertz microwave carrier.
	5G in Europe is supposed to operate at that same carrier frequency.
	Verizon wants to be like the rest of the world and operate at 28 gigahertz, but the FCC recently auctioned off 37 GHz, 39 GHz, 47 GHz for use of 5G applications.
	Why would they do that? Well, they want it to be a different standard.
	And I think this is, again, an effort to block Chinese technology.
	So if the Chinese, and even in Europe and other places, if they're going to do 28 GHz, we'll do a different carrier frequency.
	I think that's really what this is about.
	Because they know...
	That 5G is a substrate, the substrate of the 15-minute cities and the smart cities and all the rest of this stuff.
	They have to be able, in real time, to have the bandwidth to be able to monitor you, and that's what these things provide.
	And so then he talks about wavelength.
	And the important thing about this is that when you look at, he mentions this has been used in crowd control.
	For anybody that tells you that it's just a conspiracy theory that electromagnetic frequencies like cell phone frequencies are going to affect you.
	Of course, we had Alan Fry, who worked for the U.S. Navy, and he did a lot of experiments.
	As a matter of fact, he identified the Fry effect.
	You've heard me speak of this many times.
	In the same way that a microwave oven, which again is electromagnetic frequencies, it's just a different spectrum.
	A microwave oven can heat and cook anything that has water in it.
	And it was discovered by accident.
	Some technicians who had their coffee sitting on top of one of these radar units noticed that the coffee was getting hot.
	So they investigated that and they realized that they could heat it up with the same frequency, EMF, that was used for the radar.
	And so the very first microwave ovens were called radar ranges, if you remember that from Amana.
	And then if you look at these other frequencies, what Fry discovered, he and an assistant discovered that at a different frequency, and I don't remember what the frequency was, that they would hear clicks.
	And it was very distinct.
	And so what it was doing was triggering something in the body, some auditory nerves or something like that.
	So they heard this clicking sound at certain frequencies.
	And that was the Fry Effect.
	And so he started, and he got funding from the Navy.
	But he's the only person who ever got funding from the Navy.
	And they severely limited his, or the military, the government, or anything, to study any of these effects.
	He's the only one. And they severely limited it and terminated it.
	But I mention that because when we had these reports of people, the Havana effect, they said, we heard clicks and things like that.
	We think we're under, you know, and then they had all kinds of other symptoms, neurological symptoms and other things like that.
	But it began with the clicking stuff.
	And so I looked at that and I reported it at the time.
	I said, I think this is probably, you know, directed energy weapons at them, EMF of some sort, and the continued exposure, or maybe it's different frequencies, multiple frequencies they're hitting with, whatever, is causing these long-term effects.
	But of course... They were very anxious to poo-poo that.
	Why? Well, because if you start asking questions about microwave ovens or about the Fry effect or about the Havana effect, you might start asking questions about 5G and you should.
	And so another one that he mentions here, he says, when you get to 90 gigahertz, he says, and he talks about wavelength is the inverse of the frequency.
	And so as the frequency goes up, the wavelength gets smaller.
	And so he says when you go to really high frequency, like 90 gigahertz, then you get a very small wavelength that doesn't penetrate your body, but all that energy is focused on your skin.
	And they use that.
	He doesn't mention it in the article, but they use that for crowd control.
	Hitting people with 90 gigahertz EMF, it makes it feel like their skin is on fire.
	And they use that to repel crowds and to control crowds.
	And the reason for that is because all of that energy is on your skin, where you feel it very sensitively.
	When it's not confined to your skin, when it can penetrate deeper, then the 5G is anywhere from a quarter to a half of that frequency.
	And so when it penetrates deeper, it has different effects.
	And all of these different EMFs have different effects.
	And so, you know, he talks about the longer the wavelength, The more it will penetrate into your body.
	And so going to the other extreme, you have the extremely low frequency, the ELF, E-L-F, extremely low frequencies.
	This is the way that they communicate with submarines, the Navy did, because the...
	The wavelength was so long, it could penetrate down into the depths of water, and the submarines could pick it up.
	In order to put out that extremely low frequency, the ELF, they had to have an antenna that was incredibly large, and they put it in the Midwest, these big open fields and stuff, you know, stretch this thing out.
	It was unbelievable. I don't know exactly how big it was, but it had an incredibly long wavelength.
	Now, one other thing, and then we'll move on to this again, as just kind of background for it.
	Do you remember the Navy Yard shooter?
	Do you remember how he went nuts and he started shooting people and he had engraved on his gun stock, this is my ELF weapon?
	And a lot of people were like, what is he, I'm like playing games or something?
	This is his ELF weapon?
	I think it had to do because the Navy is into ELF. And because if you go back and you look at Mind Wars, that book that was written by Michael Aquino in the 1980s, in it, he talked about ELF. And he talked about ELF in terms of modifying people's behavior.
	So we can use that to change their behavior.
	Was that what they were doing? Did this guy catch on to it?
	I don't know. But it also has other, it has physiological effects.
	Some people, the ELF makes them nauseous.
	But it penetrates deeply.
	So, he says, the ELF is going to penetrate very deeply into your body.
	He says, everything else is somewhere in between.
	He said, human blood is very good at converting radio frequency, microwave, and millimeter waves into heat.
	This is the basic premise on which many medical devices work, he says.
	And then there is also a 7.83 hertz field.
	Now, this is not gigahertz, megahertz, kilohertz.
	This is just hertz.
	It just hurts. It doesn't hurt.
	You can hear...
	Typically, 20 hertz is the lowest sound that you can hear.
	Lower than that, it just sounds like individual clicks.
	So that's the lowest.
	It sounds like a continuous note to you.
	But any lower frequencies just sound like a beating that happens.
	So this is down to just under 8 hertz.
	He says, that field exists everywhere in the universe, and if you isolate a person from this field by using a thick steel Faraday cage, you will die in about three to four weeks.
	Please don't try this at home, and if you do, you are forewarned.
	I wonder, let's not tell the CIA about this.
	Anyway, if you must completely isolate yourself, do it in an earth mound house or in a house that's built into the side of a mountain.
	Much safer. And it's far better to convert the waves to heat than to try to isolate them out completely.
	And he says one way to do that, and this is where you might want to pay attention, this is something I had not seen before.
	So far I knew all this, but I didn't know this.
	He said carbon-impregnated foam is known to be one of the best and most cost-effective ways to convert radiofrequency, microwave, and millimeter waves into heat.
	Hey, we've got a use for CO2. We don't need to try to stick it into the ground, pump it across the continent and stick it in the ground.
	We can put it in foam and we can maybe block this stuff out.
	He says, once converted to heat, there is no wave.
	Use carbon loaded foam if you can.
	More is better, but you can eventually run into practical limitations and make sure you do not build a perfect square.
	Do not build perfect squares and rectangles to avoid cavity resonances.
	Alternatively, drywall, wood, fiberglass, insulation, books, furniture, mattresses, common glass, all sorts of other common stuff will convert radio frequency, microwave, and millimeter waves into heat.
	Remember, lower frequencies penetrate deeper and need more thickness than higher frequencies.
	So 5G that's operating at 28 gigahertz is stopped dead in its tracks by drywall, especially at a humidity level of 55% or 60%.
	T-Mobile's 400 MHz 5G penetrates deep, and it blasts right through your house and everything in it.
	And this is why, as their slogan says, it travels farther and delivers the strongest signal.
	So, I'm not going to go into any more detail.
	I'm just giving this to you as a reference and trying to tease this to you, because you guys go into a great deal of detail, and it's the first part of several of these.
	But he talks about how 5G... Propagates into your mouth and your nostrils.
	Goes down your throat, into your lungs.
	It will also propagate down your ear canals.
	And it will excite your inner ear.
	And the nerves. And that entire region of your brain that is in close proximity to your inner ear.
	He says, I'm sure by now you're freaking out and saying, how can I stop this?
	And so he has some very simple ways to stop this.
	And again, I'm not going to go into more detail about this.
	You can find this at theburningplatform.com.
	And you will want to reference this because it is very practical information that we have.
	And it's important for us to understand how they really don't care about our health.
	They don't care certainly about our privacy.
	They want to violate that in every way they can.
	But this has been around for a very long time.
	1986, as you all know, was when Fauci got his vaccine, his childhood vaccine legal immunity act passed so that you couldn't come after the vaccine companies.
	That was 1986. In 1996, Bill Clinton ushered through the Telecommunications Act that said, you're not going to be able to remove any of these antennas because of health concerns.
	So why'd they put that in if there is no health concerns?
	It's an admission that there are health concerns.
	That it is not a conspiracy theory to be concerned about this stuff.
	And of course, he, in the part of the article that is here, he doesn't even get into the intensity of the signals.
	Signals are going to dissipate with a square of the distance from the antenna.
	So if you go twice as far, it's going to be one quarter.
	But... You know, they don't even talk about that, and that's one of the real issues with 5G, because they're going to have so many antennas.
	They will say, well, it's a lower power level than some of these cell phone things, but it is line of sight, and you are not going to be as far from these antennas.
	So that is a big part of it.
	The other part of it is that they multiplex.
	And so if you're using the 5G signal in a city, they might have several line-of-sight antennas that are going to focus on you for a moment, and then they will focus on somebody else for a moment, and then on and on.
	But you will get several antennas focusing on you.
	But the key thing is that there's so many of them.
	And so, you know, that is actually going to increase the level of exposure to most people.
	But the bottom line is, with the Telecommunications Act, they said you're not going to be able to object to these things and get them removed based on health effects.
	We will only do something about it, and we'll not remove them, but we will cover them if...
	You don't like the way it looks.
	If you object to it on aesthetics, we will change it, but not for your health.
	Isn't that interesting? That is both an admission that there's a health issue and an admission that they don't care that there's a health issue and that they're defiant, that their agenda for control is more important than your life and your health.
	And of course, we see that all the time with the wars that they push us into.
	They've got their geopolitical ambitions.
	The money that they want to make is a rich man war and a poor man's fight, and they don't really care about you.
	You're expendable. As Hillary Clinton said, you're deplorable.
	As Trump said, you're non-essential.
	And so they really don't care about any of this stuff, and they're going to push their 5G agenda through one way or the other.
	But there are some things that you can do.
	And when they tell you that there's nothing you can do about these antennas, that's not true either.
	Let me come back to this.
	I harp on this all the time.
	We've got to stop thinking that we can stop this, that we can purify and baptize this federal government.
	It hates us.
	It is our enemy.
	It is our sworn enemy.
	It works with the globalists, and that's true of the Republicans and the Democrats.
	How do you stop this stuff locally?
	Even though they said you can't get rid of these with the 1996 Telecommunications Act, You have several jurisdictions where they did.
	In New York and California and other places like that, typically liberal places, because conservative places, the people are more business-oriented, and it's like, oh, these people, they're worried about health effects.
	We don't care about health effects.
	Let's make some money or whatever.
	But in places where they're typically leftist and they care about that kind of stuff, or at least say that they do, but in some cases they do at the local level.
	And so they had decided, well, we've got all this land that's available to us, so let's put an antenna cluster right here at this elementary school, for example, in New York.
	And they did that, and they got a cancer cluster of students, of teachers, and things like that.
	And they said, well, you can't remove that.
	And they said, watch us, and they removed it.
	And that has happened in several local jurisdictions.
	I keep hammering this down.
	Everybody is so focused on the presidency.
	Well, do you like Trump or Biden?
	Who's going to win? Trump or Biden?
	No. You're going to win.
	You're going to lose if you focus on Trump and Biden.
	You win when you focus locally.
	Things can get much worse.
	As a matter of fact, there's an article about one local sheriff and all the different cars that he confiscated and all the rest of the stuff.
	If you don't pay any attention to local politics, you can get a sheriff like that.
	If you pay attention to local sheriffs you might be able to get a good sheriff who will stand in the gap and intervene.
	And if you pay attention you might get a good town council that's going to stop and take down these antenna clusters.
	That's where you can stand and fight this stuff.
	You can do it with nullification.
	Most of the stuff that is done by the federal government, they have no authority to do.
	They bribe people, which is what I harp about with all of the Trump's executive order on March the 13th.
	That was bribing people.
	If you had good people at the local level, they would not accept that bribe.
	In the same way that if he bribes a hospital, if you've got somebody that's good there, it's like, well, I'm not going to put these people in this invasive ventilator.
	That's crazy. We've never done that before.
	That'll kill people, and I'm going to give them health care.
	I'm going to do it the way I know is right to do it, instead of taking the orders from these people.
	But if you've got bad people, they'll take the tremendous amount of money, and it was unbelievable, the amount of money, $13,000 to call them COVID patients.
	Another $39,000 to put them on a ventilator and kill them.
	And while you're killing them, you can make a 20% bonus on everything that you do there.
	You more than pay for the ventilator with one patient.
	More than pay for it. Have a fantastic profit.
	That money, that love of money, the root of all evil, that's how the federal government gets around all of this stuff.
	They bluff and they bribe and they blackmail.
	And they typically do it through money.
	And you've got to have people at the local level who have the character that they're not going to be bribed or bullied or blackmailed.
	And we're going to talk about that in the fourth hour.
	Some good Navy SEALs.
	And the trailer for that film begins...
	With a vice-admiral who says this was the most important battle we ever had.
	And it was.
	We have the military is constantly involved in preemptive wars and attacks in places that we've not declared war.
	This was a time when these Navy SEALs stood for the Constitution and stood for our rights as Americans.
	And it was their rights as well.
	But let's talk a little bit about What is happening with war?
	We have Mika Brzezinski, the spawn of Zbigniew Brzezinski, the guy who essentially created the Trilateral Commission.
	He was the one they put in place to keep Jimmy Carter.
	He was Jimmy Carter's control person.
	Like Kissinger was Nixon's control person.
	And he wrote a book, a very interesting book, I think it was prior to his book that became the basis for the Trilateral Commission.
	You know, to create world government by creating three economic common marketplaces.
	And then as you started to unify everybody through economics, then you could do a political unification.
	And in order to get that political unification, it had to be about a common currency.
	Does that sound familiar? Is that kind of what we're seeing now?
	We've got the World Economic Forum, right?
	Economic Forum. We've got the Nazis like Klaus Schwab.
	Tried to do it by force a couple of times, and now they want to set up a Reich that is going to be economic.
	And it's working for them.
	It worked in Europe. Created a common market.
	They created the euro, used the euro to pull everything together into a stronger political union.
	This is what they're trying to do now, using economic tactics and then a common currency, the worldwide CBDCs, in order to pull us together.
	But Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote a book, it was called Between Two Ages, and in it he talked about the coming technocratic age, is what he called it.
	Where he said, we're going to know everything that everybody's doing even before they're going to do it.
	Total surveillance.
	He did that 50 plus years ago.
	And so, war is on the agenda.
	And his spawn, Mika Brzezinski, on MSNBC, had Chuckie Schumer on to sell this stuff.
	And she actually asked him...
	They've got the border bill that's come out.
	Schumer and McConnell and Lankford put this thing together.
	And they're pushing this bill out and there's resistance.
	And so she asked him, asked Chuck Schumer, whether Vladimir Putin is behind the House Republicans' opposition to this bill.
	He's their favorite whipping boy.
	What do you say to Speaker Johnson who says this bill is worse than he thought or whatever it was that he said?
	I mean, how does one not see how these House Republicans are responding to this bill as not the hand of Trump or even Putin at play, she says.
	And here's how he responded.
	Well, if we don't aid Ukraine, Putin will walk all over Ukraine.
	We will lose the war.
	And we could be fighting in Eastern Europe and a NATO ally in a few years.
	Americans won't like that.
	If we don't help Israel defend itself against Hamas, that perpetual war will go on and on and on.
	Ukraine could be gone.
	The border will get much worse.
	War in the Middle East will get worse, maybe bringing us into it.
	Since when has our intervention ever helped anything?
	Since when have we won a war since World War II? Our intervention has always made things worse.
	It's always drug us in.
	It's always killed Americans.
	Will Americans be fighting in Russia if they run out of Ukrainians?
	Are we going to fight them, you know, as many people said at the beginning of this?
	Looks like we're going to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian.
	Maybe we'll fight them beyond the last Ukrainian.
	Maybe they can get a world war started.
	That's what people like Brzezinski and Schumer want.
	And, you know, when you look at this, you know, he pulls in Trump.
	And I agree, you know, it's not in Trump's interest to solve this, just like it wasn't in Reagan's interest to solve the Iranian hostages.
	They've been captured by the Ayatollah Khomeini when they took over from the Shah of Iran.
	And so Reagan worked with Iran.
	And he worked with Iran so that he could beat Carter.
	And then he worked with Iran after.
	Because part of the agreement with Iran was, you keep these hostages here.
	Until Reagan takes office.
	Not until Reagan wins, but until Reagan takes office.
	And they kept them there from the couple of months, two or three months between the election and Reagan being sworn in.
	Released them that day.
	They prolonged their being hostages for a very long time.
	Not even just to win the presidency, but to make Reagan look better.
	They kept them there for several more months.
	And the agreement, of course, was to sell them parts for their state-of-the-art jets.
	And then they had a big black budget, and they used that for an illegal war in Central America.
	And so, yeah, they have many different ways they can run this.
	All of that was a scheme of Wild Bill Casey, one of the founders of the CIA. But when you look at what Schumer is holding out there, He says, Israel is going to be fighting these people forever.
	Well, of course they are. Of course they are.
	I take the Orthodox Jew position.
	And that is, God has promised this land to Israel.
	And he will fulfill that promise.
	But he will do it.
	And he will do it in a way that brings glory to him.
	Not out of the strength of these people.
	Certainly not out of the corrupt hand that Of politicians like Biden and Bibi.
	God is not going to bless that.
	He doesn't need them.
	If he's got a plan, he can do it on his own.
	And he will do it on his own.
	That's one of the reasons why the Orthodox Jews don't sign up for the military.
	That's why the Orthodox Jews oppose the Israeli government.
	Oh, we're told anybody who opposes Netanyahu and the political Israeli government is anti-Semitic?
	No. No, the people actually believe in God and believe God's promises, unlike Ben Shapiro, who, well, I'll take the land, but I don't believe any of the rest of the stuff you said.
	Parting of the Red Sea, that's a myth.
	Didn't happen. It was a wind or something.
	That's Ben Shapiro. But I believe that part where God gives us the land.
	I'll stay here with that.
	No, Ben, you're going to see a miracle or you're going to see nothing.
	It's going to be a constant state of war.
	God does not bless...
	We look out through the history of the Old Testament.
	God does not bless a country that does things in its own strength and rejects God.
	He doesn't bless us as individuals when we do that type of thing either.
	To give you an idea, I talked about this yesterday.
	I showed you this micro flyer.
	Northwestern University developed the first flying microchip.
	Look at how small that is compared to an ant.
	Teeny Tiny, smallest ever human-made flying structure.
	This project has been to add capability for winged flight to electronic circuit chips with the idea that those capabilities would allow us to distribute highly functional with miniaturized electronic devices that could sense the environment for disease tracking, population surveillance, maybe monitoring of environmental contamination.
	That's a clip. Pretty creepy.
	Population surveillance, disease tracking, protecting the environment, all of the big ticket items.
	And they're doing that for them at Northwestern University and bragging about it.
	Everything it seems like these universities are working on now, everything is about ID and surveillance and tracking, isn't it?
	And here's another one.
	I showed you that yesterday. Scientists at Cornell University have created a new way to identify people.
	You know, they've got so many different ways they can do it.
	They can do it by looking at your face.
	They can do it by looking at the way that you walk.
	They can look at your gait.
	And here's another one that they're coming up with.
	Breath biometrics.
	Breath biometrics.
	A user authentication system based on human excelled breath physics.
	The way they describe it, They said, this is a pioneering approach.
	It attempts to build a biometric system that works purely based on the fluid mechanics governing excelled breath.
	You know, we talk about fluid mechanics.
	Water, air, that's all fluids, right?
	Just a difference in density.
	It really struck me.
	I had a bit, you know, we had to take this as part of our engineering core, some fluid classes.
	And... And so we went to SeaWorld with the kids.
	And they have it set up so that you can, you're kind of under the water level, but you can also see above it.
	So they've got the glass there where you can see the penguins up above walking around.
	And then you can see the penguins when they're swimming underwater.
	And the penguins jump in the water and they start swimming.
	I looked at it and it's like, they're flying.
	They're flying. That's the difference.
	That's fluid mechanics. The penguins have not been designed, and they're too heavy, and their wings are not sufficient to be able to fly in the less dense air, but they can fly in the water, underwater.
	And that's what they were doing.
	And then I thought about it, and I thought, you know, it's kind of interesting.
	How did Moses know?
	When he separated the three days of creation, right?
	And he, you know, well, he had the, all the animals in the sea and in the air were created on day five.
	And then all the land animals that walked or crawled or creeped or whatever on day six.
	Why would he classify it that way?
	That's an odd way to group things.
	You know, birds in the air, well, of course, it's fluid mechanics.
	It's the way that they move.
	And he does reference that on day six.
	But he doesn't reference it really on day five.
	And why would this guy, this nomadic leader, why would he be that wise in the ways of science, as Monty Python would say?
	Who made you so wise in the ways of science?
	Well, I don't know. God told me.
	I don't know. He was the one who created it.
	I thought that was a real interesting evidence of God's creation.
	But getting back to this, so fluid mechanics.
	Fluid mechanics. When you breathe out that air, they're looking at the fluid mechanics governing the exhaled breath.
	We test the hypothesis that the structure of turbulence in exhaled human breath can be exploited to build biometric algorithms.
	Think about that. The minute differences in your nasal cavity or your head are going to make imperceptible differences, really, in the way you breathe out.
	And yet, they would use this.
	They'd be able to identify people with a high degree of accuracy, actually.
	And the other thing about this is you look at the absolute mania, like these micro flyers, like this, the tremendous amount of money.
	And I guarantee you, I don't know who funded this research at Cornell University.
	It would take me a long time to find that out.
	But I guarantee you that if you look at it, you're going to find DARPA somewhere in there.
	You're going to find the military-industrial complex, the Pentagon, all this money that they've got, everything that they do is weaponized to track and surveil us and control us and kill us.
	Their involvement in the mRNA vaccines.
	So he tests the hypothesis that the structure of turbulence in exhaled human breath can be exploited to build biometric algorithms.
	This work relies on the idea that the extra thoracic airway is unique for every individual, making the exhaled breath a biomarker.
	When we stop and think about it, you know, God has made...
	All of us are unique in one way or the other, just like snowflakes.
	And I know that term has been abused.
	But we are like snowflakes, not in that sense.
	And just the infinite variety and uniqueness.
	And so there's going to be all kinds of things that they can key off of to identify us.
	The user confirmation algorithms performed exceedingly well for the given data set.
	Over 97% true confirmation rate.
	Isn't that amazing? Our academics are now funded by this dystopian government that has unlimited amounts of money because of the Federal Reserve.
	Got to get rid of the Federal Reserve.
	Such tools are expected to have future potential in the area of what?
	Personalized medicine. I think I'll help little old ladies get across the street with those bionic limbs.
	It's not going to be used to kill you.
	And the little robot dogs, they're going to be there to help the little old ladies as well.
	You believe that?
	I don't believe that.
	So, as we look at this, I just talked about the lawsuit that's going on with Madison Square Garden over facial recognition.
	And, you know, the left and a liberal judge in New York was very angry that they would use that because it's being used for their own benefit.
	Now, if they're to do it for the government instead of a profit motive, well, that's fine.
	We don't want to get in the way of that, I'm sure the judge would say.
	But in this particular instance, as I said yesterday, there's a law firm that was involved in a lawsuit against Madison Square Garden's They were very angry about that, so they went to the website and they got pictures of all the people, all the people who work for that law firm.
	And one lawyer, who was not involved in this case with Madison Square Garden at all, goes on a field trip with her child and some other adults, and she is identified and whisked out of there.
	She's embarrassed and angry, and she sues them, and now the judge has said, well, you know, this violates New York's rules that don't allow you to do this for profit or whatever.
	We're going to let this lawsuit go forward.
	But isn't it interesting?
	That was in Madison Square Garden, and isn't it interesting?
	This is happening all over the world.
	It's just a coincidence, isn't it, that all of this stuff is happening at the same time everywhere in the world.
	Just like it was a coincidence with all the lockdowns and the masks and all the social distancing.
	All of that nonsense.
	Complete and utter nonsense.
	Didn't pass the sniff test.
	Didn't make any logical sense whatsoever.
	Didn't make any medical sense whatsoever.
	And of course now we know it didn't make any difference.
	But everybody was doing the same thing at the same time.
	It's almost like they were taking orders.
	And that's Trump as well as Trudeau.
	So you've got the Italian Football League is now instilling facial recognition in all of their stadiums.
	And what are they doing it for?
	To combat racism.
	The other excuse that they have everywhere.
	It's racist. It's racist.
	This was the CEO of the Italian Football League said that last week, one player was apparently racially abused during an away game.
	And so he goes to, he's not at home, he goes away, and so the other people are taunting him because he's the visiting team and that type of thing.
	And so because of that, they didn't have any plans to do this before, of course, right?
	This is nothing on the horizon.
	But because of that in just a short period of time in one week they now have a plan to equip all of the Stadiums of these teams in the Italian Football League plan.
	They're going to equip them all with biometric Facial identification and They will scan your face as you're entering the stadium.
	They will get your information from the ticket and other things like that they will Make a database of everybody there and they're going to watch you and if you behave badly They're going to turn this over to the police All of that because some guy was apparently taunted somewhere I wonder if they were the ones who set up the taunting.
	Because this whole thing is a plan.
	They had this stuff planned. It's like the underwear bomber, right?
	And the lawyer, Haskell, who says, yeah, I saw them put that guy on the plane.
	You know, there's a guy in a suit, really well-dressed, and this guy is just like out of it.
	And he goes up and he talks to the person taking the tickets.
	And he said, I thought this was really strange.
	What is this guy who is dressed in a very expensive suit doing with this bum who doesn't seem to know what he's doing?
	So he watched him carefully.
	And Haskell said that he watched him when he got on the plane.
	And that was the guy that was the underwear bomber.
	And he wanted to testify about that.
	And the defense attorney used that to negotiate a deal for his client.
	And then they said, no, we don't want you to testify at all.
	So he got out of the country.
	But anyway, you know, but they already had the scanners built and ready to go.
	They rolled it out right away because of that.
	And so maybe the same thing was done with the Italian Football League.
	They had this solution all set and planned, designed.
	They'd already done a feasibility study in one week, right?
	They've done the feasibility study.
	They've got all the contractors lined up.
	They're ready to go.
	The approval of the presidents and the approval of the relevant budget are all that's needed.
	And, of course, it's interesting to see this kind of stuff happening at Madison Square Garden and at the Italian Football Leagues and other places like that.
	Why? Well, you've got a lot of people there.
	You've got a lot of fans, so that's one reason they would do it there.
	And you've got a lot of people who pay a lot of attention to sports, but they pay no attention to politics.
	They're the lab rats in this experiment.
	They don't know what's being done to them, and quite frankly, they don't care.
	They can tell you every statistic about the players in this sport, but they don't know the big game that's being played against them.
	And then finally, this story, Biology Matters, an obstacle course humbles an all-female SWAT team.
	They're completely missing the story.
	This story has...
	This is on Infowars that was picked up here.
	And, of course, it's been on social media.
	What they're doing is they're repackaging a social media tweet from several people.
	But what they're missing here...
	It's no news, is it, that men are better at sports than women?
	We understand that now.
	That used to be a lie that they fed people about 50 years ago.
	Virginia Slims and you had Bobby Riggs who rigged the competition with Billie Jean King because he had already beaten another female tennis player badly and then he threw that game according to the people who knew him he was and he was a middle-aged guy a middle-aged guy she was at her peak and he'd already beaten a high-ranking professional at her peak They had Jimmy Connors do a match, and he didn't rig it.
	He took on the top female tennis player, skunked her.
	Now we've seen this all the time because of the trans stuff.
	This is not news. The only thing that's news about this, it's not the male-female angle.
	That's what they focused on.
	They missed the point.
	The point is, is that this is SWAT team competition.
	I just talked about how you've got people who are clueless about what the government is doing.
	They don't know anything about politics.
	They don't know anything about the government's agenda.
	But they know everything about sports.
	Now we're going to take SWAT teams and we're going to put them in competition with each other?
	And that's what they're doing in Dubai.
	It's hosted by the Dubai police.
	And it's an international competition.
	SWAT teams from all over the world.
	SWAT teams need to be ended.
	We need to end these things, but they're popularizing them by having SWAT team competitions.
	So now you get to cheer for your SWAT team that someday may get a call or the wrong address and show up and kill you in the middle of the night with a no-knock raid.
	The SWAT teams need to be stopped, not celebrated.
	And it's not about male versus female competition.
	Pathetic. You know, you go back.
	I was just looking at YouTube.
	There's some very early films that exist.
	And people have gone back now with the tools that we have.
	They can take the jerky motion and they can make it smooth and look normal.
	And then, of course, they can also colorize them very well.
	And so you see these from time to time.
	Here's Paris in 1899.
	Here's New York in 1905.
	That type of stuff. And it's very interesting to watch it.
	Not just because of the architecture and modes of transportation, but mainly because of the attitudes of the people and how they're dressed.
	Everybody walked around dressed more formally than anybody dresses today.
	Just walking down the street all the time.
	Which I find to be very interesting.
	But it's also, it's an interesting window into the past.
	And as I was looking at one yesterday, I saw a, you know, they're taking pictures of people on the sidewalk.
	And as people are walking around, you got a police officer there, the cop on the beat.
	And again, this is right after the turn of the century, 19-oh-whatever, I don't remember.
	And everything's horse-drawn.
	And the cop in New York has those helmets that the Bobbies used to wear.
	Maybe they still do, but now I see them.
	They always now look like American cops.
	You know, at that time, the first police were the ones who were brought in...
	I forget the guy's name.
	That's why they called him Bobbies, because his name was Bobby.
	I'm having a blank here. But anyway, they called him Bobbies.
	And they would patrol.
	They were not armed. And of course, that was the way it was when Karen and I went in the 1980s to the UK. That's the way it was when I went in the 1970s.
	I'd walk in pairs.
	They had radio communicators at the time in case they got in trouble.
	But it was a peaceful enough area.
	And they could handle even the violent crime of the big city.
	And they felt that it would escalate things if they started carrying guns.
	But now they act like American police.
	But in the early 1900s, the American police were copying the British police.
	They copied the Bobby model.
	Robert Peeler was his name.
	Just came to me. It's funny how my memory is starting to go little by little.
	Slowing down. So it was Robert Peeler and the Bobbies, they called them.
	And so they were copying that model.
	Now the British are copying us.
	And now everybody is copying us.
	You know, the SWAT teams were created by Daryl Gates in L.A. And he was the one who first began militarizing the police.
	Isn't it a shame that we've now become the model for this?
	And we should be ashamed of our government for doing that.
	But you don't celebrate this.
	It's just unbelievable that this is being celebrated.
	It should be banned everywhere.
	There's absolutely no reason for a SWAT team to exist under any circumstances.
	And we have a long trail of innocent people who have died, and a long trail of even SWAT members who have been killed in some of these things.
	This is not the way to proceed.
	There are better ways to police.
	And that's what's happened to the police.
	You know, they've gone from a situation where they're respected, they were part of the community.
	In that New York video, just like the original British police, they're walking a beat.
	And they know the people in that area, and the people in that area know them by name.
	And it's like, you know, Bert and Ernie, the taxi driver and the cop.
	Everybody knew them.
	Now they don't know anybody.
	Everybody, they're afraid, is going to kill them.
	So you shoot first before they shoot you.
	That's what they want them to look at.
	Us versus them.
	And nowhere is that kind of separation and that kind of militarization and shoot-first attitude, nowhere is that stronger than in these SWAT teams.
	And so, here's what they focus on.
	After about six minutes, the women eventually make it across, but it makes for a very entertaining video.
	Big deal. We'll be right back.
	If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com.
	Here's the latest song I wrote.
	song I wrote.
	You might want to hear it in your pod.
	You know nothing. And be happy.
	Ain't got no cash, ain't got no car, but 24 booster shots in your arm.
	Oh, nothing. You can't even buy shit in the store because of your low social credit score.
	You'll own nothing.
	Be happy.
	You'll own nothing.
	Whoa And be happy.
	Be happy and eat the bugs.
	I love that song. Who said there's no good use for artificial intelligence?
	We can laugh as they weaponize it for total control of language, of speech, of your movement and everything else.
	But hey, we can entertain ourselves with videos like that.
	Yesterday we had a listener who, and by the way, before I forget, on Rockfin, Amos Poole, thank you very much.
	That is very generous.
	Thank you so much. And he comments, he says, there is a theory that people jumping from the towers on 9-11 were reacting to energy weapons.
	Yeah, I know, that's the big difference.
	Look, we all know, we all know that these buildings did not fall down on their own.
	Especially Building 7, which was not hit by a plane.
	Ha! And so now the question is, how did they bring this down?
	Did they do this with advanced explosives?
	Did they do it with directed energy weapons?
	And so that's the big disagreement with the people who are looking at this.
	And, you know, I don't really have...
	I think it could have been either one, quite frankly.
	I think that just as they kept the...
	The autonomous killer drones were suddenly revealed as we went to war with Afghanistan.
	But they had, for the longest time, been able to remotely control planes.
	And you could see them crashing with crash test dummies and cameras that could withstand the crash.
	They would crash commercial airlines to safety test them, just like the safety crash cars and that type of thing.
	So they could have done that.
	We know that they talked about doing that type of thing, even going back in the 1960s with the...
	And the Operation Northwoods, where they were going to start a war with Cuba by crashing airliners into buildings and having terrorist attacks that they blamed on Cubans.
	And so there's a long history of that type of thing.
	And I know there's a lot of people who don't believe that there were planes, that they were some kind of a project, a blue beam thing that flew into the building.
	So there's a lot of different ways that we could look at this.
	I don't really know that it's possible for us to get to the bottom of whether it was explosions, evidence of both of these things.
	Who knows?
	Maybe they had both of them.
	But the key thing is that these buildings would not collapse on their own.
	And so I don't get tied up in the details of it that I can't prove or disprove one way or the other.
	But I can tell you that there's never been a situation where a building as a steel skyscraper has caught on fire and burned for a couple of hours and collapsed on its own footprint.
	Those are controlled demolitions.
	Any fool can see it. And don't let anybody fool you about that.
	So yesterday we talked, we had a question from a listener who said, is there a place where I can listen to your live audio stream instead of waiting and downloading it later?
	And thank you to Noel, a listener, who sent this and said, you got it already.
	It's really a function that you can enable in any of the Android phones or the Google Chrome browsers.
	There's a lot of browsers that are built on top of Chrome.
	The one he talks about here is the Opera Web Browser.
	I use Brave, but it's built on top of the Google Chrome as well.
	And so he's got some step-by-step things.
	I'm not going to read it to you because you wouldn't remember it here.
	Basically, a way that you can just log in to your web browser and then log on to Rumble and do a couple of things and a couple of settings there in your browser.
	And you'll be able to, on your phone or whatever, on your computer, you'll be able to listen to the audio.
	And on your phone, you can even turn the phone off and the audio will keep going.
	You know, save battery so you don't have the display.
	So we will put that up on Substack and let people know how they can listen to a live audio stream.
	So to the listener who was asking yesterday and to anybody who would like to do that, we will put those instructions up later today.
	So thank you very much, Noel. Appreciate that help.
	I want to mention, just for your consideration, some long-term listeners who have very early and strong supporters of this broadcast.
	And Tom and Nancy, he's grieving for his father who just died.
	And he's now lost his job.
	And he transferred across the country so that he could get to a state that was more friendly for homeschooling.
	Because he's got a couple of kids, young kids, that he wanted to homeschool.
	And so he left a good job in another state because he put his family first.
	And now he has lost his job.
	And so they contacted us and asked for prayer.
	And he didn't ask for me to announce this, but I want to announce it to you.
	And... Just that God would show them his hand of providence.
	You know, we had a similar situation.
	Again, it's not, you know, it wasn't exactly like this, but similar in the sense that we thought we were doing the right thing, and we got hammered for it.
	We got rid of our business, our video business, because we just didn't want to be a part of Hollywood anymore.
	It just got so raunchy. When we first got into it, I was doing it as a testbed for a point-of-sale system.
	And then they released the catalog titles, and we liked the old catalog titles and things like that.
	But then it... When that became kind of passe and Hollywood really started going downhill in the late 90s, every year as we've seen, it's gotten worse.
	We wanted to get out of it.
	And then it was a scam.
	We lost a lot of money in that sale.
	We basically lost all of that.
	And I won't go into the details of what happened with it.
	But it got very difficult for us economically.
	And so I'm sitting there, I thought I was doing the right thing.
	Why did this happen to me?
	And frequently things like that happen.
	And as time went by, We realized that we were right on the cusp of being homeless.
	And sometimes, you know, we would get paid from a contractor that we, a job that we'd done that we'd been trying to get paid several months, didn't come in.
	And then at the last minute it comes in, it's just enough.
	Just enough. And we kept seeing things like that over and over again.
	again, and we saw God's providence in our life. So sometimes, when things like this It's a real blessing.
	you And so we look back at that time and we see that even though it's a time of hardship, it was a time where we learned to rely on God.
	Bye.
	So, I pray that that'll happen to Tom and Nancy.
	And of course, pray for their circumstances as well.
	This is from the UK. As I said yesterday about the petrodollar.
	And how Saudi Arabia has joined BRICS. And by the way, it's more than that.
	The BRICS have gone from five countries to ten countries.
	And they also have 17 other countries that have joined as kind of a limited partnership.
	Not a limited partnership. It's not a legal structure like that.
	But it's a partnership.
	It's not a full-blown membership.
	So, 10 countries and then another 17 that are going to be able to settle things in their own currencies.
	This is from a listener, Bill.
	I think is his name.
	Looks like William.
	He says, I read Confessions of an Economic Hitman.
	And if Saudi Arabia joined BRICS, it's probably because the government wanted them to.
	He said America owns the House of Saud, and another prick in the balloon called the American dollar.
	And, of course, this conspiracy theory, whatever.
	But, look, we know that it's not a theory.
	The Biden administration and so many people in Washington are doing everything they can to destroy this country's economy.
	It is a controlled takedown.
	So that may be possible.
	Finally, I have one more letter here from a listener.
	And this listener is from the UK. He says, I listen to your show in England on a regular basis in the evenings on Bitchute.
	He says, he enjoys the show.
	He says, I was listening to your show this evening, Monday, the 5th of February, yesterday.
	I'd like to mention, thank you for speaking to your listeners on your show with respect to the exceptional lady, Lois Bayless, and the excellent article from Sally Beck at the Conservative Woman website, conservativewoman.co.uk.
	The fact that they're hounding this lawyer, Lois Bayless, who in good conscience could not sit by and do nothing.
	So she put her career in jeopardy, and now they're trying to do everything they can to take her down.
	She sent letters saying, you know, it's possible because you have to give...
	The vaccine committee looked at it and said there's absolutely no cost-benefit, no risk-benefit reason to give these jabs to children.
	And they were overruled.
	The scientific community was overruled by some political masters that were there, four people who overruled them, four bureaucrats.
	And she could not believe this and risked everything to do it.
	And now they're coming after her.
	And as I said, one of the most important aspects of that was the fact that this organization, this legal organization of oversight that is now suing her and coming after her, and even if she wins, she'll have a £90,000 fine.
	But this organization was given £1 million from the World Economic Forum.
	What does that tell you?
	Anyway, he says, your show is on Mr.
	Charles Dodman's Facebook.
	He is, I believe, hoping to stand as a candidate for the Reform UK Brexit Political Party in the British general election of 2024.
	Well, go for it, Charles. We need some people to reform this.
	The conservatives have shown what they are.
	There's some good people in the Reform Party.
	I don't follow the British politics that closely, but I've seen some of the good people there have been with the Reform Party.
	So I hope he runs.
	I hope he wins. We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
	Hear news now at APSRadioNews.com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story.
	story.
	I'm going to be doing a video on how to make a simple, easy, and fun, no-bake, cake.
	I'm going to be using a cake pan.
	But you're saying that pharma buys TV spots not to convince people to ask for specific drugs from their physicians, but to subvert the news business?
	This is an open secret working for pharma.
	I never even thought of that. Isn't that amazing?
	Great Scott! What a revelation!
	Who knew that? Did you know that?
	I think everybody knew that.
	Why does Tucker think that his listeners are that stupid?
	That gullible?
	This is a con man!
	He's playing a confidence game on you!
	He's pretending that he didn't know!
	That the $25 million salary, whatever it was, that he was getting from Fox News was paid for by these murderers and pharmaceutical companies?
	He didn't realize that they were buying influence with Fox News?
	He didn't realize when he threw to these reports from this phony doctor that they have there talking about how, oh, we've got to do this and that and we've got to get the vaccine.
	You know, he goes down and he interviews Trump.
	Are you going to get the vaccine first or later?
	Well, if I do it first, they'll say that I'm going to have the line.
	If I do it later, they'll say that I don't have any confidence in it.
	I don't know. We'll see what happens.
	Well, we've all got to get the vaccine, right?
	Got to get the vaccine. Tucker threw to him.
	And, you know, he knows all that stuff.
	It just annoys me beyond belief.
	You see, Tucker and Alex and all these people who think that you don't know, and even when you do know, you don't want to connect the lies to Trump, and you don't want to connect the lies and the misdirection to Tucker either, do you?
	Here's a little bit more of what he had to say as he was talking about the pharmaceutical ads.
	But you're saying that pharma buys TV spots not to convince people to ask for specific drugs from their physicians, but to subvert the news business?
	This is an open secret working for pharma.
	I never even thought of it. Everybody knows it.
	This is an open secret. The kind of silly ads you see between the news breaks, the points of that is not, it's largely to impact the customer, but the pharma's already got that.
	They've already bought off the doctors.
	They're good on that. No, this is an open secret.
	The news ad spending from pharma is a public relation lobbying tactic, essentially, to buy off the news.
	The news is a reference.
	They're not investigating pharma.
	Oh, I've noticed.
	The news has become...
	Oh, isn't that funny? All those people who died, Tucker.
	Son of a gun. You son of a gun.
	Laugh about it. Tucker is laughing all the way to the bank at you suckers who follow him.
	He made $25 million a year selling this poison.
	Whoa, I noticed that. They're not investigating.
	Ha ha ha. Tucker knew it.
	This guy is saying over and over again, it's an open secret.
	Yeah, it's an open secret. We all know this.
	The problem is that people won't connect that knowledge to Trump or to Tucker or to Alex or people like that who lied you through this.
	They get your confidence and then they con you.
	Classic con game.
	Yeah, he says it's an open secret within the pharmaceutical industry.
	It's an open secret everywhere.
	Everywhere. We all knew.
	Including Tucker. You know, I've played this clip before where he kind of...
	It's the same type of thing that Drudge did.
	And I mentioned before, you know, I had a chance to meet Matt Drudge and we talked for a while.
	And He said that, I said, you know, I really want to thank you for putting up that picture of baby Samuel, because that made such a difference to so many people, to be able to see the truth of that.
	And I know that Fox News fired you, and I knew that you knew that they were going to fire you.
	And for a moment, he stops and he says, oh, I did that just so I could get out of my contract.
	So whatever the reasons, but you know, when Tucker, if you remember, and I played this for you a while back, And I think he was trying to get out of his contract when he gets right up to the point of accusing Fox News of selling a product that they know kills people.
	He makes the analogy to MyPillow, which is a big sponsor.
	MyPillow doesn't do anything compared to pharmaceutical companies.
	And so he makes that analogy and watch him.
	I'm going to play that clip for you.
	Watch how breathlessly nervous he gets.
	Because he knows that he's going to get fired eventually for this.
	Well, here's one measure of their badness.
	You can try this at home. Ask yourself, is any news organization you know of so corrupt that it's willing to hurt you on behalf of its biggest advertisers?
	Anyone who'd do that is obviously Pablo Escobar-level corrupt and should not be trusted.
	What would that look like?
	That level of corruption.
	Well, imagine that the Trump administration had made it mandatory for American citizens to buy MyPillow.
	That's one of Fox News' biggest advertisers.
	Imagine the administration declared that if you didn't rush out and buy at least one MyPillow, and then at least another booster pillow, you would not be allowed to eat out.
	Now he's getting nervous.
	You couldn't have a paying job.
	MyPillow, they told you with a straight face, was the very linchpin of our country's public health system.
	Now imagine as they told you that, that Fox, as a news organization, endorsed it, amplified the government's message.
	Imagine if Fox News attacked anyone who refused to buy MyPillow as an ally of Russia, as an enemy of science.
	And then imagine that Fox kept up those libelous attacks, even as evidence mounted that MyPillow caused heart attacks, fertility problems, and death.
	If Fox News did that, what would you think of Fox News?
	Would you trust us? Of course you wouldn't.
	You would know that we were liars.
	Thank heaven, Fox News never did anything like that.
	But the other channels did.
	I just can't believe it.
	I can't believe that the other channels would do this.
	Because, you know, Fox News would never do that.
	Tucker would never do that.
	Because you'd know that they're liars and you'd never trust them, right?
	You know, what he's trying to do is distance himself from that.
	He's trying to distance himself with this as well.
	But the truth of the matter is, is that he was an accessory to this mass murder.
	Just as Trump was one of the key ringleaders to this mass murder.
	And all these people who excused what Trump did.
	All these people, like Mark Levin, who said, You know, Biden is trying to take credit for your vaccine.
	You know, you desire to take a tape parade.
	You know, take credit for this. And then, after about a year, it was so widely known what was happening that all the Trump suckerfish in the media were begging him, begging him, people like Wayne Allyn Root, please distance yourself from this vaccine.
	Right? And so he did, as he started his campaign.
	The news ad spending from Pharma is a public relations lobbying tactic, said the guy.
	Callie Means. Essentially to buy off the news.
	They're not investigating Pharma.
	The news has become basically a referee.
	And you are a terrible anti-science Luddite for even asking why the shots that we require our kids to get...
	That fundamentally, by their own advertising, changed the immune system of a child for life.
	This is the very thing that their chosen candidate is so proud of having accomplished.
	This is the strong delusion that has been sent for these people.
	You have the liberals who have Trump derangement syndrome.
	They absolutely hate the man.
	And then you have the conservative MAGA people who absolutely hate what the man did.
	But they cannot bring themselves to make the connection to him.
	They're deluded into thinking that if they elect him again, he won't do something like that.
	So he says, when the two largest vaccine makers in the country are literally, he goes on, are literally criminal enterprises.
	This is Callie Means that Tucker was talking to.
	When the two largest vaccine makers in the country are literally criminal enterprises, GlaxoSmithKline and Merck in the past five years have settled two of the largest criminal penalties in American corporate history for bribing doctors and creating misleading research for the two largest vaccine makers.
	Well, see, the problem with all that is that if you look at all the vaccine companies, Pfizer is even bigger, Johnson& Johnson at the epicenter of the opioid epidemic, They made the opioid stuff for Purdue Pharmaceutical, the Sackler family that was marketing it in very unethical means.
	But Johnson& Johnson was selling it as well.
	And Johnson& Johnson had also done the baby talc powder.
	They knew what it was doing to women and to babies.
	And they continued to sell it for decades and just said, no...
	We're making a lot more money in profits than we're losing in lawsuits when people win.
	I don't care how many people die.
	It's just the lawsuits.
	As long as the lawsuits don't get too big, we'll keep making it.
	Well, Trump set them up.
	I can imagine the conversation behind closed doors.
	You know, you've had a lot of problems with this opioid stuff.
	You should get into a business that doesn't have any liability issues, the vaccine business.
	And I can set you up in that if you play along with us.
	We can make you the third supplier, along with Moderna and Pfizer.
	And they did. Gave them billions of dollars.
	Gave them a factory and set them up with a company that did do vaccine manufacturing.
	But they literally gave them billions of dollars and a factory and set this whole thing up to give them liability protection.
	They're criminal enterprises.
	And it was that criminal syndicate.
	That Trump used, RFK Jr., and his public vaccine hesitancy, he used that to up his price with this criminal pharmaceutical syndicate.
	And they gave him money, and he gave HHS, Health and Human Services, which has the FDA, the NIH, Fauci's NIAID, and all of that is under HHS, and he put all of that Under the most politically connected of the pharmaceutical companies, Eli Lilly's CEO, Alex Azar.
	And so, what Tucker is trying to do is to position himself to the outside.
	Folks, he is the ultimate insider.
	He and his father worked for the CIA. As what?
	As a propagandist!
	And Tucker, like Alex, is part of that right-wing CIA group that is pushing Trump to you.
	The CIA is not monolithic.
	It's got his left and right-wing groups that are fighting against each other as well.
	And that's what these guys are about.
	And right now, Tucker's in Russia.
	He wants to build up his creds with the base by saying, oh, look, you know, he's going to talk to Putin.
	Look, Putin is not a good guy.
	This is like saying, well, who do you like better for president?
	Do you like Stalin or Hitler? Who do you like better?
	Do you like Biden or Putin or whatever?
	Putin has just stopped the vaccine mandates.
	Just stopped that last week in his country.
	He's pushing CBDC in his country.
	He's working on his own 15-minute cities in his country.
	He jails his political opponents.
	He confiscates their property.
	But, of course, he doesn't take their land because that'd be too much like Stalin.
	That's what this guy is like.
	You know, I know that, and, of course, he did what we do all the time, which is preemptively invade a country.
	And I understand the 2014 coup, and he understands it as well, that it was headed for him.
	But he also took the bait.
	Now, he's not all that smart.
	He took the bait just like the Southerners in South Carolina did with Fort Sumter.
	They took the bait.
	They knew that Lincoln was going to bait them into war.
	They knew that Lincoln was going to go to war with them.
	Lincoln had looked at a lot of different forts that he could try to trigger an event at, and he decided he would go to South Carolina because the people there had the hottest heads and were most likely to fire.
	And when they did, when they took the bait, they appeared as the aggressors, and that's what's happened to Putin.
	But he's not a good guy.
	And he's not even, when you look at this, right?
	I just talked about vaccine mandates, CBDC, jailing political opponents, shutting down free speech, all the rest of this stuff.
	These guys are the same.
	You know, they're a little bit different, but they're different mafia families, if you think about it.
	It's like the Corleones versus the Tattaglia family.
	Versus, what was the Jewish guy in Miami?
	Yeah. I can't remember his name, but the bottom line is there's a lot of different crime families.
	It's a Game of Thrones.
	They're different, but just like Stalin and Hitler, if you're living in that country, you're going to feel like you're in the same place if you're in Stalin's Russia or Hitler's Germany.
	And so, you know, but he's going to use Putin because now Putin, because they've linked Putin with Trump to demonize Trump.
	This is a way of him to establish his credentials with the MAGA base.
	So, you know, Tucker's going to play that game.
	And once they come after Tucker for interviewing Putin, I've heard it over and over again from Trump supporters who know better.
	They know about the lockdowns and the vaccines and everything.
	But Trump's got to be a good guy because he's hated by the people that we hate so much.
	No. That doesn't make Trump a good guy.
	It doesn't make Hitler a good guy because Stalin hated him or vice versa.
	It doesn't make Putin a good guy.
	Because the people that we fight like him.
	And we make no mistake about it.
	We do fight them. We are in a war with them right now.
	We're in a war with them right now.
	It's already started. This war has already started long ago.
	It's a war over free speech.
	It is a cold war. It is a civil war.
	But it's a cold war at this point.
	We hope that it doesn't go hot.
	But it is a war against us.
	And it was a war that escalated with Trump in place because sanctions are an act of war.
	And he sanctioned the middle class.
	He sanctioned Main Street.
	He told us we were non-essential.
	And he gave money to the Wall Street big guys.
	So... Revolver, which is, again, the guy who's tried to distract attention from what Trump and Tucker and Alex did with January 6th by giving you a scapegoat, a red herring of Ray Epps.
	Ray Epps is not the reason that anybody went there.
	And we all knew that it was a grift.
	We all knew that it was going to be agent provocateurs.
	But let's make it all about Ray Epps so that you don't think about what Trump and Alex and Tucker did.
	And so Darren Beattie, who did that, says, Kudos to those of you who have already figured this out.
	Truly well done. But the reality is that many Americans haven't caught on yet.
	About the vaccine.
	About the pharmaceutical companies.
	Really? You think so? I think probably 90% of the MAGA people have caught on to that.
	The problem is the MAGA people, although they've caught on to pharmaceutical companies, they haven't caught on to Tucker or to Trump or to Darren Beattie or to Alex.
	That's what they haven't caught on to.
	So, more than half of the U.S. believes that the COVID vaccines have caused an increase in unexplained deaths.
	And it's way more than that with the MAGA people.
	Like I said, I think it's probably like 90%.
	But they still can't come to grips with Trump's role or Tucker's role in all this.
	And so what Tucker is doing here is kind of like what Trump did.
	When Trump blamed DeSantis, he locked down his people.
	And yet what happened?
	Kemp and DeSantis, about two weeks after all the lockdowns, removed the lockdown.
	And Trump excoriated them for doing that.
	Now Trump says it's all them.
	Tucker's doing the same thing.
	Tucker was part of this vaccine push to everybody.
	And he was completely owned.
	He and his company were completely owned.
	And he's pulling in tens of millions of dollars a year.
	And now what he's doing is, oh, look at them.
	They're the bad guys, right?
	So, again, it's the memory hole campaign.
	You've got Biden.
	I played you the clip for him in 2007.
	He was all about protecting the border then, wasn't he?
	So, we're going to look at that and we're going to say, Biden, what a hypocrite.
	He knows how bad the border is and he didn't do anything to protect it.
	Trump ran in 2016 about how bad the border was.
	He did nothing to protect it.
	Nothing at all. As a matter of fact, I pulled up a YouTube video yesterday.
	And got a commercial for Trump.
	And he was on with Stephen Colbert.
	And it was some company that was selling Trump merchandise.
	And Stephen Colbert was like, so you're going to build a wall?
	He goes, oh yeah, you know, China did this great, big, beautiful wall.
	It can be done. We can build a wall.
	We can make our country safer and all the rest of this stuff.
	And they're playing this clip from 2015-2016 campaign.
	It's like, how do these people...
	Not realize that he didn't build the wall.
	Why are we talking about this massive wave of immigration constantly coming in if Trump built the wall?
	Well, he didn't in four years.
	And they're going to use the fact that he talked about it eight years ago and did nothing about it when he was president for four years to sell Trump merchandise.
	What an idiocy we live in.
	It's amazing. And then you get this.
	This is from, again, this is on Drudge Report, a study finds.
	Dr. Faith Coleman writes this.
	Says, young adults are having heart attacks more often.
	What is causing it?
	I don't know. I can't imagine what's causing it.
	Can you? It's just somehow it just happened and now it's a thing.
	Just like autism. It just happened and now it's a thing.
	Now it's everywhere. We never heard of autism.
	We had never heard of autism until about the mid-2000s.
	First family we knew had an autistic kid.
	Why did that happen? Why is it now, you know, one out of every couple of dozen kids or whatever has got autism to some degree?
	Why is that happening? I don't know.
	It just happened. Let's have foundations where we support them.
	But let's not look at the cause.
	And if you look at the cause, like Dr.
	Andrew Wakefield, they purge you for that.
	And so, we don't know why there's, all of a sudden, you've got to, if you're a kid in elementary, junior high school or high school, you've got to get a cardiogram before you can play sports.
	That's never been done before. Why is that now?
	Oh, I don't know. Have no idea why that is happening.
	Alarmingly, she says, the occurrence of heart attacks and other forms of heart disease among younger adults is increasing from the ages of 20 to 50.
	And why is it happening to kids in elementary school and junior high school?
	What about that, Dr.
	Coleman? The increase in cardiovascular problems in this group was so great, so great, that it contributed to declines in life expectancy.
	Well, you better believe it. It's the shot.
	It's the Trump shot, or as he calls it.
	Trump himself called it the Trump scene.
	So the vaccine, the Trump scene.
	I like the Trump shot, because when I talk about the Trump shot, It reminds me of what he said about my people.
	The people, my people are so smart.
	And you know what else they say about my people?
	The polls. They say, I have the most loyal people.
	Did you ever see that? Where I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose any voters, okay?
	It's like incredible. I like to call it the Trump shot because he's shot and killed millions of people, tens of millions of people worldwide.
	So blood clots are now America's number one preventable killer.
	This is what we say.
	This is a Slay News article.
	Thanks to the Trump shots.
	The National Blood Clot Alliance.
	Isn't that interesting? I would think if I was going to set up the National Blood Clot Alliance, I think I would call it the Blood Clot Coagulation, or at least Coalition, or something like that.
	We're going to clot together in a club.
	The National Blood Clot Alliance says the number of deaths caused by blood clots skyrocketed after the rollout of the mRNA vaccines.
	Now, they're not making that conclusion.
	That's slay news telling you that.
	Well, somehow it just happened, and, you know, It began in 2020 and escalated throughout 2021.
	The spiking number of fatalities means that blood clots now account for 300,000 annual deaths in the United States.
	Thank you, Donald Trump.
	Thank you for that, right?
	Excess deaths.
	According to the National Blood Clot Association, or what was it?
	Alliance. It's an alliance.
	Yeah, an alliance. It's kind of like a coalition, a coagulation.
	Blood clots are now killing more Americans than car crashes.
	Trump's shots are now killing more people than breast cancer.
	And AIDS. And it's actually more than car crashes, breast cancer, and AIDS combined.
	And, of course, you can also get AIDS from the vaccines that Trump...
	Gave the pharmaceutical companies tens of billions of dollars and legal immunity for creating.
	Despite the alarming number of deaths, however, Democrat President Joe Biden's administration appears to be downplaying the issue.
	Partisan blinder alert.
	Do they say anything about Trump and Slay News?
	No, they don't. This is all Biden's fault.
	It's all Klaus Schwab's fault.
	It's all Biden's fault. It's not Trump's fault.
	It's not Tucker's fault. It's not Fox News' fault.
	It's Biden's fault. Yeah.
	You know, Trump is ragging about it.
	CDC data shows that one out of every ten hospital deaths is now attributed to a blood clot in the lungs.
	Blood clot in the lungs.
	Well, that's where we are now, isn't it?
	So how do we fake a pandemic in four easy steps?
	This is from Sasha Latapova.
	She says, you know, the data is clear that there was never a pandemic.
	The U.S. government and Trump, and she uses that term, so good for Sasha for saying that.
	She doesn't shy away from talking about what Trump did.
	People always say, well, you know, the government or Fauci did this in 2020, but then in 2021, Biden did it.
	No, she says Trump did it.
	She's right. The U.S. government and Trump announced public health emergency based on about 40 cases in China.
	This is what Gerald Slenty and I have talked about for so long.
	How is that? You know, 40 cases?
	Not even those people died.
	It was just less than five people that died.
	They called it a worldwide pandemic.
	It wasn't even an epidemic in China.
	One and a half billion people.
	Without any significant evidence of any real illness or economic impact, state governors announced public health emergencies based on nothing.
	Oh, it was based on the money that Trump released to them.
	That's what his executive order said.
	March 13th was about us to release the money so they could release the Kraken that had been created and practiced for the previous 20 years with a model legislation that they'd sent to the states.
	In Ohio, it was three cases of COVID that became the basis for shutting down the entire state.
	That was a Republican governor, DeWine, and he was one who came up with a little twist.
	Hey, we got a million-dollar lottery here.
	Take the vaccine. If you survive, you also have a chance of maybe winning a million dollars.
	You feeling lucky, punk?
	This is because declarations of public health emergency by law require no evidence that an emergency exists.
	Opinion of one unelected bureaucrat is all that's needed.
	And they're trying to change that to make it the opinion of one unelected bureaucrat at the WHO, World Health Organization.
	She says the U.S. government then provided massive funding.
	Let's say it's the Trump administration.
	The Trump administration then provided massive funds to fake PCR-label COVID cases, to murder people in hospitals with remdesivir and ventilator protocols while denying early effective treatment, as well as fake PCR-attributing COVID causes to anything, including motor vehicle deaths and gun homicides.
	And that's not an exaggeration.
	Pandemics, she says, do not exist at all.
	They're not possible in nature.
	Had they been possible, we would not be here.
	At this point, I'm asked.
	But the plague, the smallpox, the cholera, the answer is these are diseases related to lack of sanitation, crowding, infestation with rats and fleas, human and animal waste polluting the drinking water.
	And once these problems are addressed, these epidemics go away.
	Pandemics are also not possible via science, what is called gain-of-function research, which amounts mostly to ridiculous attempts at software-enabled sorcery.
	Yes, toxic chemicals can cause poisoning, but this does not spread by itself.
	And these labs should be shut down as both a waste of money and a local health hazard, mostly to those who are working in the lab.
	But she says, you look at this headline from The Lancet that she includes.
	The Lancet, this is like the Journal of the American Medical Association here in the U.S., but it's in the U.K. The Lancet said, a new study reports 309 lab-acquired infections and 16 pathogen lab escapes between 2000 and 2021, and several deaths.
	It's the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
	She said, I think the Lancet was trying to make the opposite point than the one that they really made.
	The paper identified 51 scary pathogen leaks from labs worldwide, mostly in North America and China.
	Additionally, the CDC collects reports of about 200 of these escapes a year in the U.S. So Lancet paper is a severe undercount of these potentially apocalyptic events.
	This many dangerous leaks of dangerous pathogens a year?
	We should have world-ending catastrophes every week, right?
	Yeah, see, that's like the TSA. The TSA is failing 90% of the time.
	So how come we're not having terrorist attacks every week?
	Well, because there's not a threat.
	The threat's the TSA. The threat is the health organizations here.
	And, of course, it was much worse than this when they stopped the gain-of-function stuff in 2014.
	There were so many diseased animals that escaped and so many...
	Cases of failure of equipment where people got sick and some of them died in these labs.
	But, you know, she makes a good point with this.
	But her steps for having a pandemic.
	Real quickly, I'll just go over the, enumerate them very quickly.
	Step number one, poison a few people in a few geographic locations.
	With a drug, a chemical, a toxin, or some kind of a biotoxin that has highly morbid central nervous system effects.
	She calls these sentinel cases.
	Number two, pretend it was a bug, a virus modified with CRISPR-Cas9 or something like that.
	Something's bioengineered.
	Number three, use this real bug.
	Use the real bug, the internet.
	Broadcast on social media that everyone is infected with a highly lethal agent.
	See, this part of it is being done right now in advance, preparing this.
	Disease X, you see that now being sold by Mike Adams and Alex Jones and all these other people.
	They're panicking. They're selling you the Disease X panic at the same time that Klaus Schwab and company are selling it to you, you see.
	And you think that they're warning you of what Klaus Schwab is doing, when actually what they're doing is they're preparing the fear response for the fake announcement that Klaus Schwab will do.
	She said, and finally, step number four.
	All the hypochondriacs and the worried people run to their doctor, flood the hospital ERs, and now we can get them with the fake PCR protocols and call it what we want.
	Yeah, that's exactly right.
	Exactly the opposite of what is the truth.
	We're going to take a quick break. And when we come back, I want to talk about Elon Musk and his psychedelic pharmakia.
	And also about a response to artificial intelligence, which hopefully we're going to see more of.
	It's something called nightshade. You know, nightshade is a poison.
	And this is a poison pill that artists have come up with.
	To stop artificial intelligence from stealing their artwork.
	So when we come back, we're going to talk about some of the technocrats.
	We'll be right back.
	Stay with us. Using free speech to free minds.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	The California centimillionaire, he's not quite a billionaire yet, but he's going to get there.
	He's peddling eternal life.
	Do you want to put your hope in this guy?
	You know, what is hope?
	It's his confident expectation is really where that comes from.
	We don't use it that way anymore.
	That's the word that is used in the Bible when we talk about our hope is in Christ.
	It's our confident expectation.
	But we typically see that and people say, well, I hope that's going to happen, meaning that I don't really believe that's going to happen at all.
	I'm not expecting that to happen.
	That would be nice if it happens, but I really don't think.
	So we've made it exactly the opposite of what it really is.
	But this guy who is telling people put their hope in his...
	Pharmaceutical products, his routine, all the rest of this stuff.
	This is a guy that they have focused on over and over again.
	He's doing everything that he can to try to prolong his life in this miserable world.
	You should feel sorry for him.
	I mean, he's constantly exercising, constantly fretting about what he puts into his body to the point of obsession.
	And look, we should take care of our bodies.
	I should take better care of my body than I do.
	So, you know, I'm kind of falling off the horse on the other side.
	But, you know, he is obsessed about this.
	And even to the extent that he's getting fresh young blood from his young son, transfusions to build himself up.
	He doesn't realize...
	Disappointed man wants to die.
	We don't know if he's going to be able to prolong his life or not, right?
	He might get into an accident the very next day and die.
	As healthy as he is with all those young organs, he brags that he's got the wrinkles of a 10-year-old and organs that are several years younger.
	Well, I've got the belly fat and flaccid arms of an infant toddler, so I guess I should live forever.
	I'm like a cherub.
	This guy, it reminds me of, like I said, disappointed man wants to die, and then after that, you're going to meet God in judgment.
	Remember what Christ said about the rich man.
	He built all these barns and had all this stuff, and I'm going to build even more barns and put even more stuff in it.
	Then I'm just going to sit back and enjoy this.
	Eat, drink, and be merry.
	And Jesus said, and God said, you fool.
	This very night, your soul will be required of you.
	Any of us may have that happen to us.
	None of us have tomorrow or even later today promised to us.
	But this is the mindset of the people in Silicon Valley, and I've reported about this guy before.
	I'm not going to go into that. But there is a concerted effort from all corners now to come after Elon Musk because they don't like X as a free speech platform, or at least a quasi-free speech platform.
	If you have things to say about Elon Musk, you'll still be in trouble there.
	And certain other things, the shadow bans have not been released, and we've seen some people directly banned for criticism of Elon Musk.
	Larry Ellison, who is the CEO, or was the CEO, I guess, I don't know if he still is or not, of Oracle, is part of that inner club that we're not in, of billionaires in Silicon Valley.
	He used to be a good friend of Steve Jobs, a When Steve Jobs died, one of the stories from Larry Ellison was he said he had a custom-built yacht, and it was really nice, and you can imagine.
	Steve Jobs got on the yacht, and he looked at it, and he said, oh, this is great.
	I'm going to build one just like it.
	And he said he got the same people who started to build it, but Steve Jobs came in, he said, and changed this and changed that and changed this and changed that.
	And he said, and when he got finished, it wasn't anything at all like my yacht, but he goes, every one of those changes that he made was better.
	And Larry Ellison said that to say that, you know, Steve Jobs was the ultimate Editor or master of incremental changes.
	He didn't necessarily invent the thing, but he made it so much better.
	Just like people look at the mouse and the graphical user interface from Xerox PARC and people say, well, he stole that.
	Well, he made it a lot better. He took the general idea and he made it way better.
	But Larry Ellison was also a director at one point in time for Tesla on the board of directors.
	And I guess they maybe have parted company now because he's talking about Elon Musk's drug use.
	And he's talking to the Wall Street Journal.
	And so there's all these publications out there now about how Elon Musk uses drugs.
	And it's true. I mean, you know, as people have said, when the devil talks to you about God, he lies.
	But when he talks to God about you, he tells the truth.
	And so everybody's got this kind of stuff in their background, if you look closely enough.
	So now the Oracle speaks. Larry Ellison. Elon Musk's drug use worries his business associates and board members.
	Reported the Wall Street Journal. The ex-Tesla director, Larry Ellison, urged Musk to dry out in Hawaii, sources told the Wall Street Journal.
	He went so far as to urge him to travel to Hawaii during the winter of 2022 to pause his working.
	And to avoid drugs.
	At a party in the Hollywood Hills neighborhood of LA, around the time of Ellison's suggestion, the report added, one person who attended the event said that Musk drank ecstasy in liquid form from a water bottle after having his personal security clear the floor for privacy.
	Now, I don't doubt any of this stuff, and I'm not talking about this to poor Coles on Elon Musk.
	You know, he has now come out in favor of more carbon taxes and things like that.
	He's made his fortune off of the green agenda.
	And he is a technocrat.
	He is a globalist.
	He is not on our side.
	He is not on God's side.
	When you look at the technocrats and his whole idea of Neuralink, and, you know, I'm going to transfer your body into a machine, we're going to merge with machines, the singularity, cyborgs.
	Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, all these guys, they are...
	They're antichrists. You know, not the antichrist, but they are opposed to Christ and everything that we believe, and they see themselves as gods.
	And it's not surprising that they do this, and we've all known this to some degree or the other.
	The reason I'm talking about this is to talk about the technocracy in general and the fact that Elon Musk is not really that much different from these other guys for the most part.
	Wall Street Journal said the volume of his drug use had contributed to a culture of peer pressure among his friends and his board directors of various companies that created an expectation for them to use drugs alongside of him to maintain the social status gained by being close to the billionaire.
	And that's true. You know, there is a social status that you lose if you don't join long in all this.
	You know, people get together for a drink.
	It's like, you know, I'm kind of the wet blanket.
	I don't drink. Oh, well, you know.
	And then what I found when I was in college was the people get together and, okay, we're going to have a party.
	Okay, cool. I'll come too. They all start doing drugs or drinking or whatever.
	And I don't do drugs or drinking.
	They all get very uncomfortable with the fact that I'm not doing that.
	It's kind of like Frank Serpico when he was in the New York Police Department.
	Everybody was on the take, right, with the war on drugs.
	He says, well, that's okay.
	I'm not going to just do whatever you want.
	I'm not going to turn you guys in.
	But they weren't comfortable with that. They had to have him either come in or he's out.
	Because they're worried that something's going to be done.
	You're sitting there sober and you're looking at this.
	It's like, oh. But, you know, there was always kind of a peer pressure like that.
	But it didn't really last very long.
	You know, it wasn't like people constantly hounding me.
	And I made a comment about that one time to the engineers I worked with at Data General.
	I said, you know, I was in bands and all this other kind of stuff.
	All these people are doing drugs.
	And they never offered me any.
	And they just started laughing at me.
	So they probably thought you were a narc.
	They know you're not going to take these drugs, and so they didn't offer it to you.
	But there is a certain thing.
	You know, when you're in a company like somebody that I work for who drinks heavily, if you don't...
	If you don't drink heavily, you're not going to be hanging around with him.
	So there's a certain, it's exactly the same type of thing going on with Musk.
	I say this because you should never be pressured into that.
	What a foolish thing for these people to feel like, and the stuff he's taking, cocaine, ecstasy, magic mushrooms, LSD. You're going to take that so that you can keep your job?
	Are you crazy? I mean, do you really want to work in that kind of an environment?
	Seriously. So, after he smoked marijuana on an episode of the Joe Rogan Experience, you remember that, NASA made his company, SpaceX, pledge in writing that they were following federal guidelines on drug use in the workplace, and the company spent $5 million in taxpayer money to properly train its employees on the rules.
	So, I guess you could say that's maybe one of the most expensive joints ever smoked.
	It cost Elon Musk $5 million.
	We're smoking that on Joe Rogan.
	He also said on X that he had a prescription for ketamine, which researchers suggest it can be used to treat depression.
	Is it ketamine or ketamine? I think it's ketamine, isn't it?
	Yeah, I don't know. But Elon Musk has also posted on Twitter, if you go back to November of 2020, he had a very interesting post.
	He said, here's the laws of thermodynamics.
	Number one, you can't win.
	Number two, you can't break even.
	Number three, you can't stop playing.
	That was a joke, you know, in engineering school.
	These are kind of nerd jokes that engineers tell each other.
	Yeah, jokes about thermodynamics.
	But again, I had professors who would tell those jokes and, you know, all the students would repeat them and that type of thing.
	So he puts that up. The laws of thermodynamics.
	You can't win. You can't break even.
	You can't even stop playing.
	And then he comments underneath that.
	And he says, unless you're on DMT. DMT. I know a person who did that once, and he never stops.
	He gets wide-eyed when he talks about his experience with that.
	And this is one of the most potent of all of these psychedelics.
	And you've got people who call themselves psychonauts.
	Not nuts, but knots, like an astronaut.
	And it's such a common thing for people who take DMT to believe that they've encountered machine elves.
	And the machine elves are giving them instructions and telling them things that are going to happen.
	And my friend who did it said, I think I went to hell.
	And these things were demons.
	At Burning Man, I talked to some guys who were Christians who were doing a documentary about some of that stuff.
	They said when they were at Burning Man, you have all these Silicon Valley executives who had come from L.A. And they said they had a big tent and, you know, Everybody was talking about how they were taking DMT and other stuff like that, and they were getting instructions for the next tech that they were going to build.
	This is traditional pharmakia.
	This is why the word pharmakia is typically translated as sorcery.
	This demonic...
	You know, cultic use of these psychotic drugs and things like that.
	And this is what he is a part of.
	But, you know, that aspect of it, that may explain a lot of his ideas about singularity and all the rest of this stuff, because that is a satanic agenda.
	And, you know, we look at this, and over and over again, you look at these people like Mark Zuckerberg and other ones, it's like, are they really that smart?
	Or have they sold their soul to the devil?
	That's the question you should ask yourself.
	He also said people should be open to psychedelics.
	And this was about a year after he talked about DMT. He talked about that in November of 2020 on Twitter.
	And then he says about a year later, September, the end of September 2021, he said that.
	But when you look at what is sorcery in the 21st century, yes, it does include DMT, does include these psychedelics.
	But the products of it are also things like the cyborgs, transhumanism, artificial intelligence, the technologies that we can remember by using the acronym GRAIN, genetics, robotics, artificial intelligence, nanotechnology.
	This is 21st century sorcery.
	Even to the extent that...
	Arthur C. Clarke, who wrote 2001 and some other things like that, he said, made the comment, technology sufficiently advanced is indistinguishable from magic or from sorcery or from demonic issues, really. And that's where we are today.
	And, of course, Arthur C. Clarke, A lot of allegations of a pedophile existence in the Pacific Island where he lived.
	During an interview before a live audience at CodeCon 2021 on September the 28th, Musk was asked, what role do you think psychedelics may have in addressing some of the more destructive tendencies of humanity?
	Musk said, I think generally people should be open to psychedelics.
	A lot of people making laws are from a different era.
	As a new generation gets into political power, I think we will see greater receptivity to the benefits of psychedelics.
	We're going to see our country move more and more to the occult and to this type of stuff.
	And if you think that Musk is not all about politics, and it's one of the reasons why the Wall Street Journal is doing these set pieces on him, he's made his political move, He understands that if he shows himself as an opponent of the bad guys who are censoring the conservatives, that the conservatives will then give him a free pass on all this demonic, transhumanist, technocratic garbage that he's so heavily involved in.
	They won't even care if he puts on costumes dressing up as Baphomet signs and satanic signs all over.
	They won't care about any of that stuff.
	And so, what do we do about all of this?
	As a matter of fact, one last thing, which I thought was kind of funny, based on the name of the hotel.
	When he talks about how he put peer pressure on some of the people who worked for him, they said other directors, and they name them, Antonio Gracia, Kimball Musk, Steve Jurvetson, have reportedly consumed drugs like ecstasy and LSD with him at several parties, including those held at Hotel El Gonzo.
	A boutique hotel in Mexico allegedly known for its drug-fueled events.
	Maybe that should be Gonzo.
	Hotel El Gonzo, like Hunter S. Thompson.
	Some of the directors felt pressured because refraining could upset the billionaire or could result in them, quote, losing social capital, being inside the inner circle.
	Yes, I've seen that as well.
	So that is a thing.
	It's a thing in college. It's a thing in some companies.
	If you've got a CEO who is addicted to drugs or alcohol or something like that, if you want to hang out with them, that's expected.
	And if they know that you're not going to do that, you don't hang out with them.
	But let's take a look at a different kind of poisoning.
	And that is AI poisoning.
	How do we get back at artificial intelligence?
	Well, there's a new tool. I mentioned this a couple of days ago, and I did not get to it.
	I mentioned it on a Friday, actually.
	Nightshade. It got 250,000 downloads in five days.
	They said it was beyond anything that we'd imagined.
	It's a new free downloadable tool created by computer science researchers at the University of Chicago.
	These are people who, by the way, not being paid by DARPA, but doing it on their own, which was designed to be used by artists in order to disrupt AI models that scraping and training from their artwork without their consent.
	They said Nightshade has hit 250,000 downloads in five days since release, said the leader of the project.
	And it's not just training it, they're copying it,
	right? Nightshade seeks to poison generative AI image models by altering artwork posted to the web or shading them on a pixel level so that they appear to a machine learning algorithm to contain entirely different content.
	So it may look like a purse instead of a cow, let's say.
	Trained on a few shaded images scraped from the web, An AI algorithm can begin to generate erroneous imagery from what a user prompts or asks.
	Now, of course, they will make these adjustments and there'll be, you know, this back and forth warfare and counter warfare and that type of thing.
	But the other part of this, as I've mentioned before, is that AI will also cannibalize itself.
	And they have found that, and it's kind of interesting, that just like mad cow disease, where cows get this mental disease that kills them, drives them nuts, from eating other cows, cannibalizing other cows.
	If they're fed other cows as food, the cows are not going out there and killing it.
	But if you feed them other cows, right?
	Or humans who feed on other humans can get what's called Yakov-Kreuzfeld disease.
	Same thing. But it's a cannibalism disease, and the cannibalism destroys your mind.
	And they found the same thing with AI in some of the tests.
	So if AI becomes too predominant, they need to feed off of humans.
	The artificial intelligence needs to feed off of us.
	It's not only being used to track and control and surveil us, It's necessary for it to feed off of us.
	Isn't that interesting?
	And if it gets too prolific and starts to feed on itself, it loses its mind.
	And I'm not talking about the hallucinations that it's doing, but I'm talking about just not being able to operate.
	Shortly after Nightshade's release on January 18, 2023, the demand for concurrent downloads was so overwhelming to the University of Chicago's web servers that they had to add mirror links for people to get it from other locations.
	Meanwhile, the team's earlier tool, called Glaze, which works to prevent AI models from learning an artist's signature style by subtly altering pixels so they appear to be something else to the machine learning algorithms, That has received 2.2 million downloads since it was released in April of last year.
	And so, you know, when you look at what this stuff is doing, the real threat to it, of course, is also its ability to be used for censorship.
	That is what will ultimately happen with artificial intelligence, and I think they're going to direct it at podcasts next.
	Bill Gates wants to engineer artificial intelligence, he said.
	Uh, well there are you doing that.
	They were engineering artificial intelligence from the very beginning.
	They were not willing to just let this stuff organically go out there and scrape the Internet and draw its own, you know, models and things like that.
	They build in human biases, and there have actually been articles about the people that live in other countries that they pay minimum wage to to build those biases into the artificial intelligence models.
	Bill Gates wants to engineer it so that we can end polarization and save democracy.
	The technocracy is all about tyranny.
	He does not want to have everybody just get along together.
	He wants to control what you see, what you think.
	Microsoft founder RealGates recently interviewed OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who may be his successor in all this stuff.
	Sam Altman at the Center of Artificial Intelligence.
	Sam Altman at the Center of Pushing WorldCoin and other things like that.
	These are truly megalomaniac evil men here.
	To discuss the future of AI is what the two of them are talking.
	Potential for new global controls to maintain peace.
	Yeah, like Mars attacks.
	Gates attacks. We come in peace!
	Whose ideas that the global population submit to in order for there to be world peace?
	Well, we'll submit to their ideas, of course, right?
	During the interview, Gates and Altman lamented how the U.S. government failed to rein in polarization across social media over the past four years.
	Just not enough control.
	We need more control. We can do that.
	They believe that AI could solve the problem of polarization, therefore save democracy.
	To do this, AI would have to be engineered in a way to control speech and impose lies as facts, brainwashing the population with propaganda as they're doing.
	What he wants is a hive mind, a Borg collective.
	And look, Musk is no different.
	Musk has openly talked about how he sees the potential of social media, X in particular, being a way to create a hive mind.
	That he can, and that was the purpose for social media, to create something that they could monitor what we're thinking.
	On Rockfin, Jason Parker, good to see you there, Jason.
	He said, when Elon talks tech, He tries to sound like a genius, but he really doesn't talk about anything that I don't already know.
	So I call BS on him.
	That's the way I feel about it.
	You know, he and Zuckerberg, I mean, these guys have just sold out.
	They've sold out to our satanic government, or they've sold out to the big man himself.
	Satan, who's running on his side.
	I'm not at all that smart, so much must be the same, he says.
	Well, I think you get it.
	I think they get it as well, but we understand what they're doing.
	Again, they're selling this as a way to have peace.
	But again, peace on their terms.
	A peace imposed by them.
	A peace that is their tyranny, their technocracy.
	So, um, the, uh, as this person comments here on expose news to prop to properly promote Gates style of world peace, AI would have to be engineered to rewrite the history of the crimes that Gates financed and participated in during the COVID-19 scandal, it would have to be engineered to exonerate Gates and his colleagues for imposing policies that violated human rights and imposed segregation and caused mass harm.
	Well, I think that's doable.
	I mean, they've already been doing that for both Biden and for Trump rewriting history to, you know, erase, um, their culpability and all of this stuff.
	And as I said before, uh, when you look at, um, Putin, he just took off his vaccine mandates and he's pushing CBDC and here are his 15 minute cities that are being built in Russia.
	And of course, Trump has his freedom cities, right?
	And Russia, it's Dobrograd, a new city in the Vladimir region of Russia.
	How about that? An area named after him.
	Being built according to the concept of what they call a slow city.
	See? Same thing.
	Where everything necessary for a person is within a 15-minute walking distance.
	Just like in the Netherlands, where they're doing the same thing, and just like Donald Trump, who seems to know, somehow, exactly what these people want, and who does it at exactly the same time.
	You know, when we go back and we look at what was Trump doing back in Davos in 2000, was it 18 or 19 when he was there?
	I think it was, I can't remember which one of those years.
	Here he is with Klaus.
	There they are.
	We have a tremendous crowd and a crowd like they've never had before.
	Klaus has actually told me this is a crowd like they have never had before in Davos.
	Including all of you people like they've never had before.
	So that's good. I assume they're here because of Klaus.
	Yeah, it's all about the crowd.
	isn't it? As long as you've got a big crowd, that validates what you're doing.
	That's about being popular.
	We have, when we look at economics here, we've got commercial real estate is busting out all over and collapsing all over.
	$560 billion property warning hits banks from New York to Tokyo.
	And that's not including another $300 billion in Evergrande and China.
	This is the type of thing that Daryl Salenti has been talking about For a long time, as this article on Yahoo's Finance says, people are just now beginning to feel the pain.
	And yet, Gerald Slenty was talking about this years ago.
	If you want to get Trends Journal, be way ahead of the trend, understand what is coming, TrendsJournal.com. You can use the code KNIGHT to save 10% there.
	And as we look at this engineered collapse, as we look at Saudi Arabia moving away from the petrodollar into the BRICS dollar, regardless of who's behind this move, whether it's their decision or whether they're being prodded by this by some other political entity.
	You need to be able to get outside of that system.
	As a matter of fact, we don't have time for it today, but I've got news here talking about cities going bankrupt, counties going bankrupt, states going bankrupt.
	It's one of the reasons why Senator Nicely here wants to have a gold depository to be able to weather that type of situation as we've seen happen before during the Great Depression.
	It's very important for the states to not go bankrupt as well.
	So you need to protect yourself.
	One of the ways that you can do that is to go to davidknight.gold.
	That'll take you to Tony Arderman's wisewolf.gold.
	You can provide for yourself gold and silver.
	That'll help you to weather what may be some very difficult economic times coming up.
	Do we have our guests yet?
	Okay, we don't have our guest yet.
	So let me continue on with this a little bit while we're waiting to establish that connection.
	And I'll just remind people, please like the stream.
	If you're watching us live, that helps a great deal.
	It even helps if you're not watching live, whenever you see it.
	If you do like it at the place that you're picking up the broadcast, we would really appreciate that.
	New York Community Bank Corps' decision to slash its dividend in stockpile reserves sent its stock down a record 38% last Wednesday.
	This is all about commercial real estate collapsing.
	In Tokyo, a company there, Aozora, plunged more than 20% after it warned about U.S. commercial property losses.
	And Deutsche Bank...
	More than quadrupled its U.S. real estate loss provisions.
	So all this is rolling out across the globe.
	And again, this is something that was foreseen from the very beginning.
	Of the lockdowns as a consequence.
	Regional bank stocks are now reeling and feeling the bite of the unfurling commercial property crisis.
	That was the next step that Gerald Senti pointed out.
	He said it's going to be the mid-sized banks who were pushed out of the residential loan stuff by Elizabeth Warren and her takeover to protect consumers.
	They created a great deal of red tape and paperwork, so these people started making loans, commercial loans, that did not have those requirements in it.
	And so now they are very heavily exposed to this, and it is a way for them to take out those banks.
	There is $700 billion of a slow-moving train wreck, and they said America's commercial property sector has a $2.2 trillion mountain of debt, and that is what's going to come crashing down on the commercial banks.
	They have planned a great deal of financial chaos for us.
	We have our guest. David Shantz is ready to come on.
	We're going to talk about the FACE Act.
	We're also going to talk about the documentary that he's in because he was very heavily involved.
	We've talked to him several times in the past about helping people in the military push back against these Biden mandates.
	There's now a documentary out.
	It's called Seals Beat Biden.
	And as we connect with Davis, I want to play you a little bit of, play you that trailer for that documentary, Seals Beat Biden.
	We'll be right back with Davis Shantz.
	I don't know that I've ever done anything or been involved in a team effort, because that's what it was, a team effort that had more return on investment than that one in which we engaged in.
	Capital of Afghanistan Bell to the Taliban.
	If you want a better new normal, anytime soon, Americans need to put on a mask.
	He told me that there was no chance that my religious accommodation, or that any religious accommodation, would be granted.
	And sure enough, within hours, I was terminated.
	I had no income. I had no healthcare benefits.
	I had no job.
	They come in handshaking, angry, telling us that they don't want to hear about our rattlesnake religion, saying that we never wanted to be SEALs and that we're not courageous enough to fight war.
	Anything below 95% capacity in a raid is considered critical.
	My rating, the rescue swimmers, we were at 89% and the commandant is ready to cut these guys loose over the vaccine mandate for an untested shot.
	The oath is not for the easy times.
	The oath is for the hard times.
	And it's whenever you have to make that choice between doing what the Constitution says or doing what someone else is telling me to do.
	Be a patriot.
	Protect your fellow citizens.
	I took an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.
	Every military member does that.
	So if military members' rights are not protected, they're not protected for the rest of society.
	These are the individuals that are actually willing to risk their lives to fight for the Constitution.
	Are you willing?
	Would you be willing to throw your stars on the table over a principle?
	Would you be willing?
	And that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter.
	So help me God.
	And I meant it.
	Seals beat Biden.com and that is a very powerful documentary.
	And you saw our guest in that documentary, David shots, because he was involved in that fight.
	And I mean, I think that's a very powerful documentary.
	And I think that's a very powerful documentary.
	And we're going to talk about that, but before we get to that, I want to talk about what is going on with the FACE Act, because David Shantz doesn't just, he's got military experience as a JAG officer, and he knows how to represent people in the military sphere, legal sphere. Thank you for joining us, Davis.
	It's always great to have you on, and you're always there at the most vital issues, I think.
	Thank you for joining us today.
	It's a pleasure to chat with you again. Well, thank you. I've talked about this briefly this week People here it was in Tennessee just outside of Nashville or right around that Nashville area several people six of them who have pro-life people who had a peaceful Protest at a clinic and they're now been convicted They are awaiting sentencing.
	They may get 11 years of prison and up to fines of $250,000.
	And this is really being weaponized by the Biden administration, isn't it?
	It's been on the books for a while, hasn't it?
	Right, so the FACE Act was first passed by Congress and then signed in 1994 by President Clinton.
	And this really was, this is the kind of legislation that really was a Trojan horse.
	The idea was it would also protect clinics that provide actual pregnancy care and not simply, you know, Planned Parenthood abortion mills and other things.
	Unfortunately, that's not how it's used, and it really has been weaponized by the Department of Justice, particularly under the Biden administration, to go after Christians who do things like prayer and sidewalk counseling outside of abortion clinics.
	Yeah, and we haven't, 1994, we haven't heard anything at all about it.
	Now all of a sudden, we're hearing it over and over and over again.
	It really is amazing how they're using this.
	Talk about some of the other cases as well.
	I mean, we've had situations and we've seen the picture of a guy that they tried to get with a face act and they SWAT teamed his family and all the rest of the stuff, but he wasn't even close to the entrance of it.
	That was up in Pennsylvania, wasn't it, I think, if I remember correctly?
	Right, yeah, you're referring to Mark Houck.
	So that was a protester who'd done a lot of work, a lot of prayer and counseling outside of abortion clinics.
	And what happened in his situation, and this is really, really instructive for what we're dealing with on the FACE Act, he...
	He dealt with, there was a very angry, violent, vile person who was constantly coming at him, trying to antagonize him, and actually was yelling vile things at Mark's son.
	And so Mark stepped in between this man and his son.
	The man fell down. There was some physical contact.
	The man fell down. And what was interesting is the local authorities in Pennsylvania looked at this case, looked at all aspects of this situation, did an investigation, and dropped the charges.
	Mm-hmm. And then, all of a sudden, you know, the DOJ gets involved.
	They SWAT Mark and his family, you know, early hours of the morning.
	That's how they like to do these.
	And I've spoken to FBI agents that are whistleblowers that are, you know, threatened.
	They'll lose their job if they don't do these SWAT raids to arrest these people, which is completely unnecessary and unfortunately puts agents at risk when they do this.
	But I think Mr.
	Houck's case is a really good example of the problem with the FACE Act.
	And one of the main issues with the FACE Act is why is the federal government, why is there a federal law that targets behavior that would otherwise be legal behavior except the location where it's at, number one.
	And number two, there are already laws on the books in every state.
	There are already city ordinances that would deal with anything inappropriate that's happening at these places.
	So the reality is if someone is breaking the law, if they're actually obstructing access, if they're trespassing, if they're committing assault, even if they're being disorderly, there's local ordinances, there's city ordinances, municipal codes, and state law that would prevent that illegal activity and would address it.
	But that's not good enough for the Department of Justice.
	And so again, this was, you know...
	To me, this FACE Act really is a Trojan horse that once they're inside the walls, now you have a politically motivated Department of Justice that is anti-Christian, anti-faith, doesn't like anyone saying things that are against the narrative on abortion as some sort of medical care, and that's the real issue now.
	So it is being targeted, and these people are people with no criminal history, no violent past, that are now facing over a decade in prison for For peacefully praying and singing outside the entrance to a clinic.
	And, you know, it's not just the fact that, as you pointed out, the local law enforcement looked at it and said, there's nothing here.
	And we all saw they had video that was on outside camera there.
	Everybody could see that there was nothing, no big deal.
	And so, you know, the video was there.
	Everybody could see that. Local law enforcement saw there was nothing there, and yet the Biden administration comes after them, and at the same time, as you pointed out, in 1994 when they created the FACE Act, it was going to be comprehensive for a lot of different things, but they don't do anything on the other side to protect crisis pregnancy centers from even arson or bombs that are thrown on them.
	They won't even investigate that, will they?
	No, they absolutely will not.
	And that's a critical issue.
	No one's advocating any kind of violence or law-breaking when it comes to sidewalk counseling outside of these clinics.
	But what they are really targeting is that peaceful behavior.
	They want to end that.
	They want to scare people into not even doing the kind of counseling that saves lives, that saves these pre-born children over and over again.
	And I think the other interesting issue about the case in Tennessee, as well as just the FACE Act cases, is federal courts and the DOJ are not reacting well to the Dobbs decision.
	And here's what's so important.
	There's an argument to be made that the Dobbs decision is, look, there is no federal right to an abortion.
	If that is true, then what is it that these individuals are doing and why does the federal government have any role or jurisdiction over this?
	Because again, what they're alleging is they're doing something that is violating a federal right.
	That's why the federal government has jurisdiction.
	But even in the case in Tennessee, the judge refused during motions practice and as the attorneys were drafting the jury instructions and I spoke to the attorneys...
	The judge refused to entertain that, even refused to instruct the jurors on the fact that Dobbs says abortion, there is no federal right to an abortion, there's no constitutional right to an abortion, refused to instruct the jurors on that.
	So, again, I think that's a significant issue, and that may be the end of the FACE Act if federal courts...
	If the appeals courts and ultimately the Supreme Court look at this and say, okay, wait a minute, we have ruled there is no federal constitutional right to an abortion, and so where is the jurisdiction for the federal government on the FACE Act?
	So that may be the undoing of it.
	Unfortunately, as things happen here, you have individuals with no criminal history, no violent past who could be doing significant time in federal penitentiaries waiting for relief from the Supreme Court if it ever comes.
	Would they have to go to jail if their case is on appeal?
	Would they still incarcerate them?
	It's up to the discretion of the judge.
	Wow. It's up to the discretion of the judge.
	So often people do sit and wait in confinement while their case is on appeal.
	Wow. That's amazing. And you know, when you look at it, it's the judge's instructions.
	And when I covered this case the other day, I talked about a guy who was a marijuana advocate up in New Jersey, called himself New Jersey Weed Man.
	I forget what his real name was, but that was the name that he went by.
	And he had a large amount of marijuana that were going to try him as a trafficker.
	And he said, you know, I think there's enough people here.
	That don't like the criminalization of marijuana that I could get hung jury if I argue for jury nullification.
	And he did that. He took it.
	It's actually in the state constitution.
	The jury should judge the facts of the case, but also the law itself and the penalties that could be imposed.
	And that goes all the way back to William Penn.
	In England, when they came after him, he helped to establish jury nullification.
	And so he showed that to the jury, and the judge said, take that down, I'm going to lock you up.
	Well, the jury had already seen it, so they voted 7 to 5 to acquit him.
	But the prosecutor came back, and he went before another judge.
	The judge let him put up that card, which quoted from the New Jersey state constitution, and he let him keep that up.
	And then he got his acquittal of 12 to nothing.
	So it really comes down to the judge's instructions. In many cases, judges will tell the jury, you have no right to judge the law. You're just here to judge the case and I will tell you, you know, these other things.
	Like you talked about the fact that the judge would even keep them from, keep the attorneys from telling them, talking to them about the implications of the Dobbs decision. But what about jury nullification?
	Let me ask you as a lawyer, what do you think about that?
	It is a Hail Mary thing, and he couldn't find any lawyers who would do it.
	That's why he represented himself.
	Well, you know, jury nullification is, this is my frustration with it as a practicing attorney.
	The reality is that jury nullification was a fundamental part of our constitutional system.
	Thomas Jefferson himself said that the jury is the only anchor yet imagined in the mind of man by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution.
	That's a mouthful, but think about what they were saying.
	All of the founding fathers believed in the concept of jury nullification.
	In other words, if the federal government or any government is going to put a citizen on trial, ultimately, not the judge, ultimately the jury can say, factually this may be accurate, but we do not believe this should be called a crime, therefore we are going to say not guilty of a criminal act.
	Mm-hmm. And since our founding, there has been a gradual, at first, and then a much more violently rapid movement to eradicate the concept of jury nullification from our court system, which is truly unfortunate.
	At the end of the day, our system, there are so many checks and balances in our system, but one of the critical ones was this concept of jury nullification, where a jury of your peers, of your fellow citizens, could look at the government and say, Yeah, that's true.
	The rules to not meet as a church if you're not meeting as the official state church.
	No question about that at all.
	They shut that down. And that was such a foundational thing.
	You know, even into Victorian times, you know, Gilbert and Sullivan, who did all the light operas and stuff, they even had one called trial by jury, you know, because that was such a fundamental concept.
	I mean, stop and think about it.
	It is as important, if not more important, than something like free speech, because that really is where you can stop the tyranny is with a jury nullification.
	It's such an important thing.
	But I looked at that and I said, now, if you would have gone for jury notification, I got to believe that there's going to be a couple of people, even in liberal Nashville, because of Tennessee and surrounding areas, I got to believe they could at least find a couple of people who would say, no, I'm not willing to lock up these family, these law-abiding family-oriented people for a decade and give them a quarter of a million dollar fine.
	I got to believe you'd find at least one or two people like that until the prosecutor got tired of coming back after them, I think.
	Yeah, and honestly, that's what I was hoping for in those cases, is that there were people that were just willing to do the right thing.
	But again, in federal courts in particular, they've done everything they can to prevent attorneys from arguing for jury nullification.
	Attorneys can be held in contempt for doing it.
	There's There's only a couple states where it's still part of the Constitution.
	One of the New England states, I can't remember which one off the top of my head, still has it.
	It still happens there.
	That's the only state where it's still there.
	But it is a challenge practicing law to essentially allow a jury to see and understand what you are saying without crossing the lines with regard to jury nullification and trying to empower them to do the right thing.
	And I've successfully done that without blatantly arguing jury nullification against the instruction of the judge.
	As an officer of the court, there are limitations that are placed on an attorney, but juries can see through to the right thing and they need to be empowered to do that.
	So there was a subtle, you know, reform that needs to happen.
	And again, it would have to be subtle at first and then not, but we need to go back to that concept of jury nullification.
	It's absolutely critical.
	Yeah, and it's so bad that, you know, as you point out, if a jury's, you've got a juror who openly says it, even the jurors have to be careful when they do jury nullification in most cases, because if they start talking about jury nullification, you get kicked off.
	That's right. If you don't have the time to do it, jury duty, just tell them you know about jury nullification at all.
	They won't seek you in the first place.
	But, you know, what you're talking about in terms of the way the Biden administration has really criminally applied this law that is 30 years old and weaponized it for political purposes and abused this law.
	It's another example, isn't it, of how things go wrong when we try to centralize it all and when we try to federalize everything instead of these types of things being done by local law enforcement.
	You're absolutely right.
	And honestly, and people think it's radical when you say it, but we should be asking questions in this country on why today, why we even need an FBI, why we even need a Department of Justice when it comes to criminal cases.
	And I'd submit to you, there's a great argument that we don't.
	And if we look at the history of the FBI and where it came about, the FBI was really created to deal with a specific problem, which was interstate bank robberies.
	Bonnie and Clyde would rob a bank in Kansas, and then they would flee to another state, and they would get away with it. But now, states can evolve and develop, and they can do interstate compacts when it comes to crime. They can extradite people and do those other things.
	So in a modern era, especially with people moving the way they are, and the agreements we have for other crimes between the states, I think there's a lot we could look at, and we can see the danger of the growing federal government, centralized government, all of it.
	Every time we move things to DC, we lose freedom and the states lose accountability and responsibility every time that happens.
	So I agree.
	But simple things like jury nullification We need to come back.
	We need to be pushing those things so that we can recover freedoms.
	And it is supposed to be a government with the consent of the government, a government of the people, by the people, for the people.
	Those words are not idle words when we think about the intent and the meaning of that.
	And so, yes, we are a nation of laws, but we're also a nation of political will.
	And the people need to understand we need to have that.
	Yes. That's a very interesting court, but you don't have a way to enforce that, and I disagree.
	And then the people could vote that leader, that political leader, out of office in the next election if they chose not to go by it.
	But that's the kind of role that they envisioned for the courts, not what we have now.
	And again, that's another example when we talk about federal courts and the Supreme Court of this federalization and centralization of power, which is really dangerous to our freedom.
	Yes, exactly what does check and balance mean if you can't do that?
	And what you're talking about was exactly done by Andrew Jackson, who said, you know, the Supreme Court's issued their opinion, let's see him enforce it.
	And he was wrong in terms of his policy, but he was right in terms of the way the Constitution and the authority of all these different things happened.
	But, you know, when you talk about how we've centralized everything...
	And the Dobbs decision and the central point that you were making was that the FACE Act may ultimately be overturned when people look at the fact that it was supposedly there to protect what the Supreme Court had decided was a constitutional right.
	And yet they didn't have the authority to really do that.
	They didn't have the authority to decide when life began.
	And that's what the Dobbs decision was about.
	I said before the Dobbs decision, and it really, really surprised me.
	That it happened. I never thought it would happen.
	But I'd always said that the appropriate response to Roe v.
	Wade was for the Texas governor to say, well, you've made your decision.
	Let's say you enforce it.
	We will decide what murder is here in Texas.
	And that's essentially what the Dobbs decision said.
	It said this is under the Tenth Amendment.
	These things should be decided at the state level.
	And everybody understood that and started freaking out because it said, wait a minute.
	That means that they could overturn their definition of marriage, and they could overturn this and that and all the rest of these things that the Supreme Court has crossed over the line to do.
	So this is a very important case, and this FACE Act is not only a miscarriage, a political persecution, but it is also something that could have very far-reaching constitutional implications for the Supreme Court and the judicial system, I think, if this is overturned.
	Yeah, I couldn't agree more.
	And again, with the Dobbs decision, you know, fundamentally, I believe that life begins at fertilization, and so the Dobbs decision was flawed because it didn't go far enough, right?
	That our fundamental obligation should be to protect life.
	However, what the Dobbs decision got right is a fundamental understanding of our constitutional republic and our federal system, where the states really do have the authority over these things, and really, most of the authority was supposed to rest with the states.
	So, in that respect, we've seen some very good jurisprudence from our Supreme Court pushing back on federal government power.
	We just need to see more. I agree.
	Yeah, I'm concerned, you know, I understand people's concern about protecting life, and I share that.
	I'm just concerned that if they were to put in a federal law, which is what a lot of people are talking about, and already when you see Pence and other people talking about it, they typically are picking 15 weeks.
	15 weeks is way beyond what they've done in Florida and other places.
	It's way beyond even what they did, what they have in France, where they just relaxed it and they've extended it to 12 weeks.
	It used to be more stringent than that.
	And so who gets to set that level?
	Well, it's going to wind up being set politically if we make it a political thing in Washington.
	And so it might be at 15 weeks with the Republicans.
	And when they put that in, I don't think New York and California will enforce that.
	And you can't force them to do that.
	But I think when they take it all the way up to 36 weeks or beyond, I think that most of the Republican states, they'll obey that.
	You know, and so we're going We get the worst of both things if we make it a federal issue.
	I've seen that in the past.
	The Republicans say, well, that's a federal law.
	I've got to obey it. The Democrats will say, no, we're not.
	Take a look at marijuana legalization, for example.
	And so I'm concerned about that.
	Let's talk a little bit about what is happening at the border, because that's another constitutional issue.
	I've talked about it when it first started happening.
	I said, that's a very important constitutional issue, and I'd like to get your take on that.
	But I said, at the same time, people need to understand There's a lot of grandstanding that's going on.
	I mean, we're only talking about a two-and-a-half-mile area, you know, and that's the only place where they're really putting anything there, and so the border's still wide open.
	Everywhere else, 2,000 miles, you've got two-and-a-half miles that they're really fighting over, but it's got important constitutional issues on it, doesn't it?
	It does. You know, the practical impact of this is minimal.
	The border is wide open.
	The policy of our federal government, our Department of Homeland Security, is to just invite as many people in as possible, regardless of who they are, where they're from, or what controls we have over that.
	That's obvious. What's happening is just beyond absurd.
	But this issue is critical because it goes to a fundamental question of, does the governor of Texas have the ability to take action to protect the border, the sovereignty of Texas, and ultimately to protect the property and lives of the citizens of Texas?
	Does the governor of Texas have the authority to do that?
	And I would say they have an obligation, both a legal and moral obligation to do that.
	And so ultimately, you have a lot of interesting issues that rise up from this.
	You have an older case that was, Scalia wrote a very famous defense to it.
	It was called the United States versus Arizona, where essentially the majority of the Supreme Court said, if it has to do with immigration, it's the sole province of the federal government That's it, right? And that's a very overview summary of it.
	And Scalia was talking very eloquently about the issue of state sovereignty, and he used language like, the Constitution isn't a suicide pact for the states.
	They have the ability to protect their citizens, to protect their sovereignty, to protect their borders.
	And that's really the issue here.
	Does the state of Texas have the ability, does the governor have the ability to act in an emergency, in a declared emergency where it is a threat to the property and the lives of the people of Texas to do this?
	And the answer is, of course.
	A county sheriff would have that authority, both under a constitutional system, but also under God's law, the doctrine of a lesser magistrate.
	It's all there. But what's particularly interesting, I think, and critical that we address is the federal government is not simply ignoring the law. They're choosing to circumvent federal law and the sovereignty of our nation to do what they're doing.
	And so that's the bigger issue here is can states act? Do they have sovereignty? But also what happens if the federal government, the executive, is refusing to do their job and protect our nation and protect American citizens?
	What can a state do?
	And so we've had the Supreme Court make an initial decision, but they said that Biden could undo any border barriers, and he could open up the border if he wished.
	But that's not a final decision.
	Where is it in that Supreme Court process?
	Right. So all of this was essentially an emergency appeal by Customs and Border Patrol to seek permission to be allowed to cut the razor wire, right?
	And Texas was trying to prevent them from doing that.
	So that's it. That's the only thing the Supreme Court was looking at.
	And the argument presented by Department of Homeland Security by the feds, if you will, was, well, they're interfering with our ability to do our job because we need access to these areas so we can process these illegal immigrants.
	And so the Supreme Court said, Texas, you can't interfere with them doing their job.
	And so they can cut these down so they can do their job.
	Of course, nothing about that emergency decision, and there wasn't even really a written opinion, so we don't really understand what all of the logic or rationale was.
	We just know what the vote was.
	But ultimately, they don't go into any of the other issues.
	They just said, for now, on an emergency basis, Texas, they're going to come in.
	They're allowed to cut this stuff down so they can do their jobs.
	That's interesting. Yeah, I guess we could...
	First thing I covered it, I talked about Occam's razor wire.
	You know, common sense is going to tell you that that isn't what they're really about, and we all know why they want to get to those areas, because they're going to facilitate the immigration of people who, as I've said in the past, I believe the real issue...
	Underlying all this, regardless of what kind of barriers or enforcement you've got at the border, the thing that is the real issue is the welfare magnet, and they're pulling people in.
	Those welfare magnets have a really strong pull, even if they're all the way up in New York City.
	If they start giving free benefits to everybody and make themselves a sanctuary city, these people who are at the border, when they ask them where they're coming from, they're coming from all over the world, but where they want to go to, about 95% of them want to go to New York City.
	And so that welfare magnet is a big part of pulling people in.
	But from the legal standpoint, as you said, I agree with you.
	I think they have the authority and they have the duty to protect lives and to protect the border from what everybody agrees is an invasion.
	And of course, there's broad political support for this.
	So it's become a real big political football, but I think there's some very, very important legal issues, as you said, because again, this goes back to, you know, the power of the local states. And I think this is an area that we see coming up time and again in many different areas because the federal government has become so politicized, so dysfunctional, so corrupt, that people are increasingly looking to the state government to interpose itself. I think that's
	possibly one of the most important benefits of this grandstanding that's happening at the border with the governors that are going there. I think that's perhaps one of the most important things.
	What do you think about that? Yeah, that really is the point here.
	I think the practical implications of this that could benefit the country for a long time is that a governor is willing to stand up and say, no, states have sovereignty, this is dangerous, and federal government, and I think this is important, federal government, you are not doing your job.
	You are... You're failing to follow the law.
	You're failing to enforce the law.
	So someone has to.
	We as the lesser magistrates have to step up and do this.
	And I think it's very powerful, even if it just seems like grandstanding, that other governors are willing to support Texas.
	They're willing to sign on.
	They're willing to endorse what they're doing.
	And there are governors that are willing to send the National Guard to go and support Texas in what they're doing, independent of any sort of federal support to do that.
	I think the other... Interesting thing we will see legally in the future is, you know, Florida developed a state guard, right?
	And people talked about this.
	Oh, you know, what is DeSantis doing?
	He used his authority, the governor, to create a state guard that cannot be federalized, right?
	It's not. There is no, you know, I served in the Pennsylvania National Guard when I was still in the reserve component.
	And in that, you have a dual status.
	You are a member of the state militia.
	And you also have federal recognition.
	So I have federal recognition as an officer.
	So normally when you're in the National Guard, you have this dual status.
	Those State Guard members, you know, we might think of them as like Texas Rangers in Texas, but in Florida they did that, and they did that for specific reasons where they didn't want to have to wait for or rely upon a federal government that might not help them when they need it.
	Yes.
	that's very important. So I think other states are going to be looking into similar things because they're realizing practically they cannot rely on a federal government and they and they also can't rely on them not just because of incompetence but because of everything is so political they may not come to their aid. Yes and if I remember correctly the Florida Guard part of the reason that he was doing that was to try to protect people from these Biden mandates for the for the military which is what the next thing we're going to talk about here that you've been very heavily involved in.
	That was another aspect of it, to even protect the guard from the federal government.
	From federal overreach.
	So I think that is a very, you know, again, to have state guards instead of something that is under the federal government.
	But this move away in many different ways from this overreaching federal authority that's put its tentacles in every aspect of our lives.
	Nobody says the joke anymore, but, you know, we used to always say when somebody would get overwrought about something, well, don't make a federal case out of it.
	But everything is now federal case.
	And so I think the pendulum is starting to swing the other way.
	And I think one of the most important things about this, even though there's a lot of political grandstanding that's going on, and a lot of political moves, because Biden did not nationalize them because then he would be nationalizing them in order to open up the border.
	So I think that's kind of held his hand on that.
	But and so that was a good political maneuver.
	But I think the best thing that could come out of this would be for conservatives have started have adopted this mindset that has been the mindset of liberals for a long time, that everything needs to be done by the federal government.
	And I think to be a very healthy thing for people to start looking more to state and local government to intervene and to interpose against an increasingly authoritarian and intrusive federal government.
	I think that's one of the most important things.
	don't you? It absolutely is.
	And practically speaking, you know, we understand it.
	It is in our DNA to think that way as a nation, right?
	We don't get a revolutionary war.
	We don't split with England as the colonies without the idea and the concept of the doctrine of the lesser magistrate.
	In other words, local authorities who have the authority by the people that they govern to act and act responsibly Taking these steps.
	But the other practical implication, not just that it's in our DNA as a nation, we can actually have influence over what happens locally.
	I mean, how much effort does it take?
	I mean, people can think about the county you live in.
	Do you know who your elected district attorney is in your county?
	Do you know? Do you know if they're a Republican or a Democrat?
	Are they conservative? Are they a Soros-funded DA? And what do you think it would take?
	Look at the number. I mean, in so many counties across the nation, It's a few hundred votes, maybe a few thousand votes that would make the difference between who's your district attorney.
	Why does that matter? That's one of your chief law enforcement people in your county that's going to decide who's bringing charges or not.
	That's just one example. Your county sheriffs.
	Critically important when we talk about law enforcement and protecting citizens of the county from federal overreach.
	So you can have an impact.
	A few churches get together, they rally behind a good, solid candidate, not violating 501c3 status, but actually encouraging people to understand the issues.
	All of a sudden you can swing an election at the county level and even at the state level when you act together that way.
	So practically speaking we can have so much more influence there than we ever can in in the swamp that has become DC Oh, you're so right even Elon Musk is that I've been saying that for the longest people always well Who do you like for president?
	I said, you know For your local sheriff, who do you like for your local town council?
	And you look at the fact that for a presidential election, you're one of 300 million people voting You you may have a million times more effect And in your local election then you do your vote is a million times better more more powerful than it is In a federal election for president or anything like that and the closer you get to you the more effect it has even Elon Musk has pointed that out and he pointed out the brilliance of Soros by focusing on local district attorneys. We should be that smart. We should learn from these guys
	They know what they're doing and they know how to manipulate and get control. And so I agree I think it is the the local issues But it also then comes down to the individual and that's what well we were showing at the beginning the the trailer election for president or anything like that and the closer you get to you the more effect it has even Elon Musk has pointed that out and he pointed out the brilliance of Soros by focusing on local district attorneys we should be that smart we should learn from these guys they know what they're doing and they know how to manipulate and get control and so I agree I think it is the the local issues but it also then comes down to the individual and that's what well we were showing at the beginning the the trailer for the new documentary that's coming out talking about this struggle that you've been involved in very heavily from the very beginning you're in the the trailer there seals beat Biden that documentary tell us a little bit about that documentary and then we'll talk a little bit about what the current status is of these things so
	tell us a little bit about the documentary Davis Yeah, absolutely. So Seals Beat Biden was a concept that was developed.
	It's a relatively new news media outlet called the Republic Sentinel.
	And they came to me, they came to former Navy SEALs and others and said, hey, we want to tell this story.
	We want to tell the story of what happened.
	We want to do it well. We want to honor these people.
	But we also want to do it in a way that we can prevent things like this from happening and also shine a light on the implications of everything that happened with the COVID mandate on the rights of all American citizens.
	So that was sort of what was behind the project.
	So the Republic Sentinel was fantastic.
	What's out now currently is part one.
	It's a three-part series.
	I'm not exactly sure when the second part is going to be released.
	It should be released very soon.
	And then there'll be a final third part that's released as well.
	So you can follow what's going on at sealsbeatbiden.com.
	It's free. You just have to give them your email address in order to log in there.
	But you can set up an account and watch it free.
	It's very, very well done.
	And I think some of the most powerful aspects of it are just telling the stories of individuals like Asa Miller, one of the Navy SEALs I represented in this, talks about what it was like for those guys to go through this.
	Talks about people being put in isolation, being essentially in solitary confinement, what it was like for him.
	And Asa's in a great position to tell that story because he was one of the Navy SEALs from the very, very beginning that said, I don't believe this is right.
	I don't believe this is constitutional.
	We need to take a stand.
	Not just for ourselves, but for everyone in the military that's afraid to speak up because they're not a Navy SEAL and for the American public.
	And he was willing to be court-martialed.
	He and I sat in a room together and I said, if you don't follow this order, you understand what could happen.
	And he was ready and willing to be court-martialed if that's what it takes.
	So I'm so glad that he's able to be in it and tell part of his story.
	And there's other people that were critically involved in sort of rallying people to this cause and creating...
	Not just a rally point, but a way for people to get this information out there and have the courage to take a stand within the military.
	So it went from isolated individual military members working on this on their own to, at one point, and I think we've talked about this number before, but even the DOD admitted that there were over 260,000 military members that were not compliant when the mandate came out.
	Right? Over 260,000.
	That's over 13% of the total military force that were not compliant by the time the mandate came down.
	And that's the DOD's numbers.
	So, you know, how far we trust that, I'm not sure how far we go on that.
	But Seals B. Biden is an effort to sort of tell the story of what happened.
	And then as you get into episode three, I'm told the goal of that episode is really to talk about the future and how we take stands against things like this in the future and learn from what happened.
	That's excellent. And it all begins with the individuals.
	And, you know, I've seen some articles.
	There was one I saw the other day.
	Somebody said, you know, there are more people involved in all of this than you think.
	Just as they want to make everybody think, well, you're the only one who had a family member die from this shot.
	Or you're the only one who got paralyzed from this shot.
	I know it was happening to everybody.
	They did such a great job of trying to isolate and atomize and cover this up with everybody.
	You point out 13%, 260,000 people even according to their numbers.
	Of course, you look at the things that they're doing with the Bureau of Labor Statistics, how they rigged those numbers last week.
	It's just amazing.
	But they always rig the numbers.
	They rig the COVID numbers.
	They rig the protest numbers and all the rest of this.
	But it really did come down to the individual.
	You know, when you make this stand, Each and every one of us is going to have to make that stand as an individual and make that individual decision.
	And I like the way the documentary trailer started with that Vice Admiral, I think it was, who said the most important fight he's been in.
	And it is true, because this is a fight for our country, a fight for our Constitution, and for everyone's individual rights.
	And I like the way they came back to him.
	And he said, you've got to be willing to throw those stars on the table.
	And the sad thing about it that bothers me, Davis, is the fact that they have pushed so many good people like that out of the military.
	I think that's a big part of the agenda.
	What do you think? Yeah, you know, and I didn't want to believe that, right?
	And very early on in this, people started talking about a purge or otherwise, but I was, you know, I was a JAG, I was a lawyer in the military, I was a lieutenant colonel, I submitted my religious accommodation request, I trusted the process, and then it was denied, and it was denied improperly, it was denied for the wrong reasons, and so I had great pause, but I'm like, okay, I'm going to appeal my own, you know, religious accommodation, I'm going to help everyone else do it.
	And I quickly realized from the beginning they weren't going to be granting these religious accommodation requests.
	The goal was 100% compliance no matter what.
	And then it doesn't take very much imagination to start thinking about, okay, if you have a significant portion, you know, 10, 13, 15, whatever the real number was percent of the force that is objecting to not just to being vaccinated, but being, but objecting to the way this is being done and the way it's being forced on the American public and on the military for their, their moral, ethical, and religious reasons. Then you have to realize, wow, who's leaving
	It's people that are willing to question orders.
	It's people that are willing to say, no, I took an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.
	I'm not going to turn my back on that.
	And people don't fully understand the documentary helped tell this story, but I can just rattle off examples of how this policy was in direct violation of constitutional rights and in direct violation of federal law.
	And they knew that, and they refused to stop.
	I mean, the best example, and it's almost humorous if it wasn't so serious for so many people, but the Department of Defense Inspector General.
	The Inspector General's office is supposed to be the watchdog for the Department of Defense, and they work for the man, so you have to wonder how independent they really are.
	But even they did a cursory review of the religious accommodation process, and they said...
	Department of Defense, you are not doing this correctly.
	It is impossible for you to be doing the individualized review that's required by law.
	There are not enough hours in the day, days in the week, weeks in a month in order to do this because you're spending...
	They did a calculation.
	It's like even if you were working 10-hour days with no breaks, you're spending minutes at most on each one of these individual accommodation requests.
	That's not what the law requires.
	The DOD IG wrote a memo...
	Sent it to Secretary Austin, the Secretary of Defense, and said, you need to see this because our initial analysis is you're violating the constitutional rights and you may be violating federal law by the way you're doing this.
	And it was ignored.
	Yeah. We're good
	to go. That we're willing to ignore federal law and the constitutional rights of military members to accomplish a goal which was 100% compliance with an experimental vaccine.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And we had a lot of people who were scientists or people in the medical community, and they didn't wake up until they're working on it and said, yeah, we got this other thing over here.
	Maybe this works, maybe that works.
	And that happened in many different ways, many different places.
	And they were immediately shut down.
	We have one solution, and you're going to do this.
	And it's like, wait a minute, there's something wrong here, right?
	And so you're seeing that everywhere.
	But fundamentally, what happened to people in the military, it's essentially the same thing that we see in private companies or we see in the hospitals, for example.
	The government bribes people with money, and then it says, and then you're going to do this, or we're going to take that money away.
	And so it ultimately comes back to what that vice admiral said, you got to be willing to throw those stars on the table over your principal.
	And that was the same thing that happened to nurses in hospitals.
	You know, they hold your career, they hold your livelihood and your lifeline up to you, and you have to make that decision, am I going to stand by the money and the career, or am I going to stand by my principal?
	And that's why this is a story for everybody, inside the military or outside the military.
	And a lot of people have gone through this fire, and the good thing about this is they've come out on the other side. And I've talked to so many people who have absolutely no regrets about whether they lost their job. Many of them found something else to do. They're happier about that.
	The people who have regrets are the ones who had their arm twisted and went along with the coercion.
	Those are the people I see over and over again who have regrets.
	Yeah, absolutely. And there's just been tremendous community built out of what happened.
	And, you know, this idea you were talking about earlier of isolation, you know, during this whole military fight, there were so many times when someone would call me and they'd be like, I'm the only person on my entire installation.
	My chain of command is telling me I'm the only one.
	I'm the last holdout. What do I do?
	I'm all alone here. And I'm like, nope, you're not alone.
	Yeah. I have talked to five other people that are your same installation that are being told the same thing by their command.
	They're being lied to about that.
	But just even the idea, and that was part of the whole idea of what the Navy SEALs like Asa Miller did and were willing to do, is they were willing to risk their careers in order to get the word out there, hey, you're not alone.
	You're not alone. You're not isolated.
	There is a whole community of people that are taking a stand.
	And the idea is, courage is contagious.
	And one of the things I think is a difference, and maybe this is hyperbole, maybe it's not, but people like Asa Miller being willing to take a stand and saying no and not comply is a difference.
	other people throughout society that took a stand, restaurant owners, gym owners, doctors, nurses, small businesses, they took these stands.
	And the fact that they were unwilling to comply churches as well, is why we didn't have concentration camps like they had in Australia, in the United States, right?
	Because there was not the political will to do that, because there was enough people, even though it was a small percentage, saying no and not complying with this government overreach.
	And so the government didn't have the political ability to carry out as much as they could or would have without that.
	That's what we need to learn from this.
	We need to have communities of people willing to come together, willing to rally at the local level, using the doctrine of lesser magistrates to take these stands.
	And if nothing else, I think that's a lot of what is hoped to be taught and talked about through the documentary.
	Yes.
	They're so focused on speech and controlling our communications with each other because they want to do that isolation thing.
	And you know when you look at the military I think about it how much they they've got to be It's got to be an especially difficult thing for people in the military because they spend so much time Trying to create this cohesiveness. You're part of a unit You know you're not just an individual out here And and that was part of what you and others were saying about this You know by isolating these people and making them the other you're really harming that kind of cohesiveness But I imagine the people who are being
	Ostracized and isolated over all this stuff they really feel that To a greater degree than somebody who is just working in a civilian job because in a civilian job You're not trained to have that kind of a team unit idea And now you are kind of leaving the team and betraying the team is the way they're portraying it to people, wasn't it?
	Yeah, absolutely.
	I mean, that was part of the pressure that was put on myself and so many military members.
	And when you get down to people like Navy SEALs, the team, the cohesiveness of that team, that small unit tactics, all of that comes together.
	And it absolutely was.
	There was a lot of pressure put on individuals say, well, everybody else is doing it.
	Just go along, go along, go along.
	And not everyone else was doing it, which was part of this.
	But the other thing is, you know, again, You have to understand, these individuals, so many were motivated by the fact that they believed this was wrong, and all they did was start asking questions, right?
	That's all a lot of us did, is just ask some questions, and you weren't even allowed to ask questions.
	As soon as you started to ask questions, then you were, you know, you were faced with tremendous pressure, and, you know, I've seen it over and over and over again, where just the The mere fact that you're asking questions has been met with challenges from the military, isolation from the military, and it went past COVID. I'm still trying to fix people who lost their security clearance, not because the mandate was repealed, so they were in good standing.
	detailed memo to their commander explaining why they felt it was unlawful to order military members to receive an experimental medical procedure, a medical product, under federal law, why they believed that.
	Then they were being challenged as being disloyal or exercising poor judgment, and they're trying to revoke their security clearances.
	Most of those cases so far we've won, and we've gotten the security clearance back, but that was sort of like the next level.
	And again, when you see things like that, you start to say, that really does feel like a purge then.
	If you're not just saying, oh, you survived the COVID mandate, but now we're coming after your security clearance because you dared say that you think this order might be unlawful, you're not allowed to do that.
	That's the exact opposite of the way our military was built and designed and just the DNA of our military. We used to have a military that really focused on the small unit, the platoon, the platoon sergeant and individual freedom of action within your area of authority, even on the battlefield. We've won battles historically, as a nation, because it didn't matter if a small unit was cut off from the chain of command or communication, they had the freedom and they were expected
	to exercise good judgment and carry on the mission, even without, you know, a general officer telling them what to do, right. And that was the difference between, you know, the Allied military on D-Day and the German military, no one would wake up Hitler to release the tanks on D-Day, or the Germans may have pushed us off the beaches. But again, there was this command structure where they had no freedom of action.
	That's what we've moved to in our military. So on a very practical level, COVID exposed that punishing commanders and anyone who asks hard questions, that's a dangerous thing to That's something we need to be working hard on in our military as well.
	We need to go back to a concept that we want free thinkers who, within the structure of the law and the Constitution, feel comfortable doing their job and doing it well.
	That's what's made us have the best and most powerful military when we've been successful.
	Oh yeah, and that's what makes our economy work.
	Not having central planning, not having total centralized control, and yet that is the essence of what they want to do.
	Well, you've got a lot of different things that you do there.
	Your website is Yontz Law.
	That's Y-O-U-N-T-S Law.
	You've got a lot of military experience.
	You help people who are Christians who are being persecuted.
	People can also follow you on X at Davis Yontz Y-O-U-N-T-S again.
	And Tell us a little bit about, we've only got about a minute and a half, give us a little bit of a commercial for what you do at Yantz Law.
	Yeah, so we are focused primarily on representing military members, so we help military members with all kinds of things, rising from the level of administrative actions to court-martial cases.
	We have pushed into, since COVID, a lot more religious freedom issues, so we're We're able to do that and we use our experience.
	I've added another attorney to the firm, Caleb Byrd, who is a former senior army prosecutor who's outstanding on these issues as well.
	So that's our goal is really to support military members.
	We want to be in a position to encourage military members to do the right thing and to help them navigate the process.
	So that takes us all over the world and we hope to be able to continue to do that as long as God allows it.
	And as you pointed out, I mean, there's just no end to this.
	They're so tenacious. Yesterday, I was talking about how Alvin Bragg, Manhattan DA, he's coming after people over COVID stuff still.
	And so the military is especially, you know, as you pointed out, taking security clearances of other people.
	They are...
	Out to get their revenge against anybody that pushed back against their narrative for centralized control.
	And it just keeps going.
	So thank you so much for what you do.
	Davis Yance, YanceLaw.com.
	And you can also find him on Twitter or X at Davis Yance.
	Thank you so much for what you do, sir.
	Appreciate it. Thank you.
	God bless you. Thank you. Have a good day.
	And thank you all for listening.
	And we appreciate that.
	Have a good day. The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲