Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 9, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:11

The David Knight Show - 01/09/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thanks for watching.
	you You're listening to The David Night Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 9th of January, Year of Our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to take a look at a couple of books warning us about what is coming financially.
	The final countdown to CBDC and others are warning of what is coming very rapidly.
	What we must do, as we talked last week to Catherine Austin Fitz to protect financial freedom.
	And we're also going to take a look...
	At the rapidly expanding surveillance state, now putting out keyword search warrants.
	And finally, we're going to go back, unfortunately, again to Jeffrey Epstein.
	Because there's now new information about Donald Trump, and I think it is about more than just the corruption and the pedophilia.
	We see that Trump and Clinton are really two sides of the same coin.
	How can people be so blind to that narrative?
	We'll be right back You know, when I look at this Trump-Epstein stuff, and I said it the other day, I said, look at how divided the press is.
	You have the right-wing press will talk all the time about Clinton.
	Clinton, Clinton, Clinton.
	And yes, he should be talked about.
	But they don't talk about Trump, and then vice versa.
	When you look at the, you know, the MAGA bird media always talks about Clinton, and the Mockingbird media always talks about Trump.
	It is a perfect example of how we have been split into these two camps and we refuse to look at the evil of the people that we are following in so many cases.
	And so we look at this.
	There is now more information that's come out.
	And on a more personal note, I've had a lot of people write to me and say, you need to apologize for saying that Trump has not been exonerated.
	He has. He wasn't mentioned in this stuff.
	Well, Maybe he was.
	There's now allegations that he was Doe 174.
	Now, that is speculation, but Doe 174 certainly does fit the description of Trump.
	And we have many other people who have said that he was just as involved in this stuff as Clinton was.
	You see, again, Hillary and Bill, just a flip side of Trump.
	We're supposed to believe that they're completely different.
	We're supposed to believe, by the way, too, that Trump is an anti-globalist in spite of everything that he did in 2020 being exactly the globalist agenda.
	But you have to cling on to that little bit of hope.
	How pathetic is it that we put our hope in princes, especially princes like Bill Clinton and Donald Trump?
	I watched this when it all happened with Bill Clinton.
	And his supporters, and even decades after, people I talked to, friends and family members who liked Clinton, and they, well, you know, that's just, the right wing just hated him.
	Everything was great under Clinton, and they just came after him, and he didn't do anything wrong.
	I said, seriously? Well, look, he wasn't charged with anything.
	You know, he lied about a consensual affair.
	So what? I don't care if he had an affair with Monica Lewinsky in the White House.
	So what? The character doesn't matter to you at all.
	No, it doesn't, you Bible thumper.
	And I hear the same stuff, people defending Trump all the time.
	So they come after me and they say, you need to apologize, you need to retract that.
	And it's like, no, actually I don't.
	Because the truth is going to come out, and it's dripping out now.
	The inherently salacious nature of the long-running Epstein tale.
	No doubt accounts for the Western media's ongoing fascination with Epstein and Maxwell.
	But there's another factor at work here.
	Desire to expose and bring down those individual members of the global elites.
	And folks, Clinton and Trump are part of the global elites.
	Take a look at what they did.
	Look at what Clinton did in office for the banks.
	Getting rid of Glass-Steagall.
	Authorizing the merger of Nations Bank.
	And Bank of America to create the biggest bank in the country at the time.
	Look at the way and many other things that he did.
	And look at the way that they rent all this stuff.
	It is...
	And then look at what Donald Trump did.
	How can you not say that they're playing for that team, for the globalist elites?
	They party together.
	They socialize together.
	They have orgies together.
	What in the world is wrong with these people?
	And yet, they put out these blasphemous things about these fantasies.
	This is like these NFT fantasies where Donald Trump is like a superhero and he's doing this thing.
	This thing, and God created Trump.
	Yeah, he prepares his own meal.
	You know, when Melania, who they're getting ready to kick to the curb, or she's already withdrawn herself or whatever.
	She stumbles in her high heels and Trump supports her.
	She's lunching with women and he has to do his own lunch.
	I guess he had to actually pick up the phone and call for McDonald's to be delivered to the White House.
	And then he goes to church after all this hard work, all this blue-collar work that he's doing out there.
	What a fantasy these people have believed in.
	What an idol they have created out of all this stuff.
	And so we need to bring down, we need to cast down this illusion, this mind control.
	I get people trolling me all the time on Twitter.
	You know, you're doing some really valuable stuff in terms of waking people up, but, you know, this doesn't look good for you to criticize Trump and Alex and all this kind of stuff.
	And it's like, well, if I don't criticize them, I wouldn't be doing my job of waking people up.
	I wouldn't be doing my job of warning people about those who are deceiving them, who have designs on them for their harm.
	You know, you're not going to last with this stuff, and I probably won't.
	I probably won't. I've got so many people who are Just beyond annoyed with me, I've had people tell me over and over again, well, I really liked your show until you got off on Trump, and I just can't watch you anymore.
	They tell me that. So, fine.
	You know, go feed your fantasy.
	You know, go buy the Trump NFTs and go watch the Trump ads talking about what a hard-working, blue-collar billionaire he is and how much he loves and follows God.
	Okay, you can do that. You do that.
	I don't keep telling people the truth, which is exactly the opposite of all that.
	There is, however, an element of political naivety in all this.
	Haven't Western elites always sexually exploited young girls from the lower orders?
	Yeah, we can be cynical about that.
	And that is true.
	And they do get away with it.
	And they do kill...
	The people who expose them, don't they?
	And that's one of the reasons why I believe that this woman, who was very specific about Trump, recanted her testimony.
	She said, it'll destroy me and my family.
	Nobody will believe me. They'll take Trump's side.
	I can relate to that.
	But I tell you, these people want to lecture me about...
	I've never had any dealings directly with Trump.
	I've dealt with a lot of people who are in his inner circle.
	I know what these people are like.
	I even know what they think about Trump privately, what they say publicly.
	Don't lecture me that I'm naive.
	You're the ones who don't know if you think that, okay?
	New Epstein docs reveal alleged sex tapes of Bill Clinton, clearly identifying his face.
	And as I pointed out last week, An FBI whistleblower who was part of the child trafficking team said it took us, what was it, 12 hours or something?
	Go through the Epstein mansion, 8 floors, 40 rooms.
	We got all these tapes, CDs that were marked and labeled.
	They had faces on them.
	They had names on them.
	We put them in a box and we sealed it with evidence tape and those boxes have disappeared.
	So in one of these tapes, one of these depositions that was released now as part of this, A person said, thank God she managed to get a hold of some footage.
	Except I think the people who got a hold of the footage are somebody else.
	Second cache of Epstein docs is now unsealed.
	And so, again, the Gateway Pundit has this long article about Clinton.
	Never mentions Trump.
	How typical. How typical that is.
	And then you have Breitbart calling out Mark Ruffalo, the Disney star who played the Hulk and some other things, because he shared AI-generated Trump Epstein Island images.
	So he gets slammed on social media for doing that.
	Is that any different than that garbage God-created Trump that Trump pushes out?
	This fantasy world these people live in.
	I said, this isn't the first time Mark Ruffalo has fallen for a hoax designed to hurt Trump.
	And it's not the first time that Trump's followers have fallen for a hoax designed to elevate him into some kind of person with character and leadership.
	And I say this, and I'll say this one more time.
	I've said it before. I said, why is it that we treat people who betray us differently than we treat people who are open enemies?
	You know, the whole thing about a fifth column, the story behind that in the Spanish Civil War, some guy says, you know, there's four columns that we got coming after this city.
	Four columns of the military.
	But he says, the key thing is the fifth column.
	The fifth column are the people inside the city that they don't know.
	They're going to stab them in the back.
	They're going to open the gates. They're going to do all the rest of this stuff.
	It's the fifth column. Why do we supposedly...
	Uh, give prisoner of war status and protection to soldiers who are caught and captured wearing uniform.
	I know that hasn't always happened, but it's supposed to.
	Uh, and yet, it is generally accepted even by the people who will give, uh, you know, kind treatment to prisoners of war, supposed to give kind treatment to them.
	It's accepted generally that you execute spies.
	Why is it? Well, it's because one column that's going to stab you in the back is far more dangerous than four columns that come at you wearing the uniform, flying the flag.
	And this is why I focus on Trump.
	He is the fifth column of the globalists.
	He's not leading a global nationalism and global populism revolt.
	He is not.
	He was leading what happened in 2020 with a bioweapon and the 17 million people, or whatever the number is.
	That were killed by his bioweapon.
	So exonerated?
	Not at all. Except by the press.
	And in your imagination, if you believe that.
	Trump is named in the latest Epstein documents.
	Sarah Ransom said that he had had sex with many girls in an email.
	She also claimed that Epstein had tapes of Trump, of Richard Branson, of Prince Andrew, of Bill Clinton.
	None of these really are new.
	And it's not really new about Trump either.
	We always knew that. In the latest dump of papers, Epstein victim Sarah Ransom wrote to Daily Mail columnist Maureen Callahan.
	At the time, Callahan worked for the New York Post and was reporting on Epstein.
	so ransom who was a victim contacted her and emails and said Trump had had sex with many girls including a friend of hers who's not named it says she also slept Bill Clinton virgin billionaire Richard Branson yeah think about that yeah he calls his airline virgin air Epstein's Island is in the Virgin Islands yeah of course Richard Branson of course he didn't do anything as people deny that he had any involvement with it all why
	would anybody suspect anything from associates of Jeffrey Epstein She retracted all of her claims, telling Callahan that she wanted to walk away from the citing fears for her family.
	You go back and you look at Ross Perot, right?
	Ross Perot was pulling up in the 30 percentile area in a three-way race against Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush.
	Then he suddenly quit.
	And everybody couldn't understand what it was.
	And later on, he said, yeah, I had threats against my family.
	And then he came back, and everybody just dismissed him as this paranoid conspiracy theorist.
	He never regained that position.
	And, of course, they tightened up the rules to make sure that you're not going to have third-party candidates.
	Even a rich billionaire is not going to get in there as a third-party candidate.
	It is claimed that Epstein filmed each of these sexual encounters, that the women involved also obtained copies of the tapes.
	No such footage has ever been publicly uncovered.
	And, again, the FBI agent who was in charge of this, who said, we got all that, and we sealed it, and those boxes were disappeared.
	Disappeared. That's why this kind of stuff happens.
	Ransom claimed to have a friend who slept with Trump.
	She said, I will send you that photo, she said to the reporter at the New York Post.
	I will send you that photo, amongst others, as soon as I'm able to fly back to the UK next week, as I definitely 100% have it all in my little storage block.
	And so, you know, do you think that the people, the Trump supporters, would believe it if they saw a video of it?
	I really don't know at this point.
	If they can look at what happened in 2020 to them and to other people, if they can look at what he said, what he did, and if they can still excuse what Trump did, I don't think if you showed them videotapes of him in the act, That it would make any difference to these people.
	And I'm including in that a lot of evangelical supporters like Paula White.
	Give me a break.
	This prosperity gospel pastor.
	She doesn't have the gospel at all.
	She's just selling prosperity.
	That's what she's selling. I will make sure that neither that evil, and she characterizes Hillary Clinton with a B word, or that pedophile Trump gets elected, she said.
	I will also make sure that everybody on this planet sees that footage and that photo, and I will release them to WikiLeaks by Sunday.
	I will take down Epstein and his bunch of cronies myself, followed by about 10 exclamation marks.
	I have also gone to a Russian newspaper, said Ransom.
	When you look at all of this, this is the second time that we've had somebody equate Trump and Clinton.
	It was first done with Mark Epstein, brother of Jeffrey Epstein.
	He said, Jeffrey Epstein told me, my brother told me, that if the world knew what I know about Trump and Clinton, they would cancel the 2016 election.
	Mark Epstein said that.
	Now, Trump, not Trump, Tucker, has Mark Epstein on.
	He doesn't ask him about that.
	Isn't that interesting? Don't you find that?
	Instead, they talk about whether or not his brother committed suicide or was murdered.
	They don't even entertain the possibility that he's still alive.
	But he doesn't ask them.
	Ask him about that.
	And now we've had a second person who's on record as having said, I'm going to expose them both.
	And end this stuff. I'm going to expose Hillary and the Clintons and Trump.
	We've got two different sources.
	You know, the Bible says in the mouth of two or three witnesses, you need to have this established.
	We don't have just one person saying this.
	We've got two people saying this.
	Trump and Clinton. Same thing.
	Disgusting. So, they ignore about that.
	They ignore all of that stuff.
	You know, just like Tucker.
	When everybody starts waking up about the vaccine, Tucker focuses people on the Wuhan lab leak thing instead of the warp speed bioweapon.
	Ransom claimed to have been sent footage by her friend that showed her having sex with Clinton, Trump, and Branson but said she could not share the videos without her friend's consent.
	Trump has denied the allegations through his spokesman.
	Branson's company, Virgin Air, denied his connection with the Lolita Express or the Virgin Islands or these things as well.
	And by the way, these allegations are that this didn't happen on the island or on the Lolita Express, that it happened in Epstein's mansion, which is what I said.
	You want to tell me that because it was not mentioned in this particular case today, With Virginia Guthrie, and maybe he was with one of these John Does that has not been unsealed.
	I said, you want to tell me that because that's there that he's exonerated?
	Do you realize that, you know, the mansion was as much of an issue as anything else?
	And he spent a lot of time there, as did Clinton.
	Ransom said, I want to walk away from this, Lynn.
	I should not have contacted you.
	I'm sorry I wasted your time.
	It's not worth coming forward, and I will never be heard anyhow.
	And only bad things will happen as a consequence of me going public.
	Does that sound like she doesn't believe this stuff, or that she's just afraid to go public with it?
	This will just create pain for my family.
	And they have already helped me pick up the pieces once before.
	I cannot ask them to do that again.
	She's seen this stuff.
	She's talked to the women.
	She's furious about it.
	About that pedophile Trump, as she put it.
	And Hillary.
	And she puts behind 10 exclamation marks.
	I will end this myself.
	I will show the world.
	And then she comes back and says, I can't do that to my family.
	Does that sound like this is not really true?
	Epstein victims claim that Trump had sex at the mansion, but then she recanted everything.
	Only bad things will happen if I talk about this.
	Again, eight floors, 40 rooms, all of them wired for video and sound.
	So, again, this is the point of covering this stuff, not to revel in the sensationalism of it, but to point out that Clinton and Trump are two sides of the same coin.
	And it's not just their sexual corruption.
	They're two sides of the same coin when it comes to their globalist agenda and the actions that they've taken to help Davos, the World Economic Forum, and the UN to forward their agenda.
	It's very interesting to see this on a Raw Story headline Trump's been implicated said Alex Jones as he was stunned stunned I tell you shocked beyond belief to find out this about my hero Trump stunned by the new Jeffrey Epstein documents John said, I was given during breaks big national news that Trump's been implicated, okay?
	I can't speak to this until I've had time to research it, so I'm going to go off the air soon.
	Sounds like somebody else we know, doesn't it?
	Oh, I just don't know what to say about that.
	You know, I'm actually going to have to read an article.
	He knows this stuff.
	He's known this forever.
	Anyway, what he's doing, I've got to buy some, I don't really know how to respond to this.
	I'm going to have to go off the air.
	I'm going to have to think about how I can spin this and lie about this and still support Trump.
	He's been for Trump. He's been against Trump.
	He's been for Trump. It's like, he loves him.
	He loves him not. He loves him.
	He loves him not. He's going to figure out how to spin this and he'll be back.
	I said, well, I'll tell you what I think, because I don't know.
	I don't know what's going on.
	I'm going to have to go off the air and think about this.
	Trump did hang around with Epstein some.
	Some? About 20 years.
	They're good friends.
	He said, and so I'm not going to sit there ever, ever and condone any of that, but we're going to find out.
	He's going to get to the bottom of this.
	Yeah, you bet. Well, actually, this is pretty old news, really.
	Five years ago, Washington Post, and look, you want to dismiss this Washington Post just because of their politics, because they've lied so many times?
	I understand. Look, you should always question everybody.
	You should never trust anybody.
	Anybody can get it wrong.
	Anybody can deliberately deceive you.
	But if you're going to discount a source, like the Washington Post or mainstream media, never listen to anything that they have to say, you should at least consider it.
	Check it against what other people have to say.
	Because if you don't do that, you're no better than NewsGuard.
	Really, right?
	NewsGuard, well, I don't like those people because they're opposed to me politically, so we're going to block them everywhere.
	We're not just going to say they got it wrong on this one thing or something.
	No, no. They oppose us on a key agenda.
	They oppose us on the pandemic or the vaccines or the climate change.
	Well, you don't ever go to them at all.
	And if you do that with the Washington Post...
	Or with any other, look at these stories and see if they sound true or not.
	This story, by the way, seems to be very factual because they're not the only ones saying this.
	I picked this up, but there's a lot of people who knew about what was going on.
	Everybody knew they were very close for 20 years.
	And so it says, for the better part of two decades, in the late 1980s, Epstein and Trump swam in the same social pool.
	I'm sure we should call that the swamp, right?
	They were neighbors in Florida.
	They only lived two miles away from each other.
	They jetted from LaGuardia to Palm Beach together.
	They partied at Trump's Mar-a-Lago Club together.
	They dined at Epstein's Manhattan Mansion together.
	And then in 2004, they were suddenly rivals.
	Each of them was angling to snag a choice Palm Beach property, an oceanfront mansion, that translated was the House of Friendship, it had a name.
	It was being sold out of bankruptcy.
	And that was what seemed to break their friendship.
	You know, the story that's put out there by the Trump supporters was, well, he realized that Epstein was a pedophile after hanging out with him for 20 years.
	If you really think Trump is that clueless, Maybe he's not the guy that you want as president.
	If you think he's so clueless that he was completely manhandled and deceived in the 2020 stuff, maybe he's not the guy that you want for president.
	Frankly, I have more respect for his intelligence, Donald Trump's intelligence, than his supporters do.
	They're always excusing him as being some kind of amiable dunce.
	Well, not necessarily amiable, but a dunce.
	It was something like Donald saying, you don't want to do a deal with him.
	He doesn't have the money. While Epstein was saying, Donald is all talk.
	He doesn't have the money.
	And they both really wanted it, said the trustee in the case.
	He was the trustee who was getting rid of the estate.
	He was at the center of the negotiations.
	They'd known each other for a very long time, said Sam Nunberg, a former Trump aide.
	He said, bottom line, Donald would hang out with Epstein because he was rich.
	And their falling out happened after the fight over this piece of property.
	And interestingly enough, about four months later was Epstein's first brush with the law.
	Somebody reported him as a pedophile.
	I wonder who that could have been.
	When I think about the fact that Donald Trump is characterized by his lawyer, Ty Cobb said he is someone who is incapable of acting except out of his own self-interests or out of revenge.
	That was when, it was four months after this fight, when Epstein's legal problems began.
	See, that's the kind of guy I personally think Trump is.
	Terrific guy, Trump said, of Epstein in 2002.
	Oh, he's a lot of fun to be with.
	Within two years, the public sightings of the two had ended.
	However, in 2016, Trump Organization attorney Alan Garten told Fox News Trump had no relationship with Epstein.
	They were not friends.
	They did not socialize together.
	But Epstein, rather, asked in a 2010 deposition if he'd ever socialized with Trump, responded, Yes, sir.
	Well, who are you going to believe?
	I mean, these people around Trump, they've got it covered, don't they?
	They were not good friends.
	They didn't even know each other.
	And as you can see the video right there, apparently that's not true.
	So, Trump had said this is a Vanity Fair article, 2021.
	He's a lot of fun to be with, said Trump of Epstein.
	The headline was, Inside Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump's Epic Bromance.
	Very, very closely tied together for 20 years, and they have a fight over a piece of property.
	Isn't that typical?
	Beginning in the late 80s, the infamous sex trafficker and future president, the sex trafficker being Epstein, the future president being Trump, and their mutual friend, not just Melania, but Ghislaine Maxwell, paled around for almost two decades.
	The reason this article came up in 2021 was because of a new book, American Compromat.
	And the author talks about their, quote, shared tastes for private planes, shady money, and foreign-born models.
	As Melania was introduced to Trump by Jeffrey Epstein.
	Trump spent plenty of time with Ghislaine Maxwell and Epstein.
	In fact, he fit in quite well with them.
	Arabistas, all of them, be it Epstein's Coney Island or Trump's Queens or Robert Maxwell's Eastern European place, they had all come from wrong sides of the track.
	And at some point in their lives, Robert Maxwell, Trump, and Epstein all had ties to foreign intelligence agencies, to arms dealers, and to the sex trade.
	You know, when you look at, as I said, one of the things that concerned me about Trump when he was running and I was doing more research on him was a very long Vanity Fair article where they talked to the people in West Palm Beach about Trump and his Mar-a-Lago situation and how he was just trying to impress them.
	You know, he'd come in late, he wouldn't talk to anybody, then he would excuse himself early, and it's just, you know, I brought you all here, you're eating at my table, you know, you were subservient to me, that type of thing.
	That was how he wanted to mark his territory, essentially.
	It was a world of unimaginable decadence.
	The epicenter of the operation was Epstein's enormously opulent Upper East Side townhouse, a calculated spectacle that declared to the world that Epstein, a college dropout from middle-class Brooklyn family, had been embraced securely in the bosom of the powers that be.
	Epstein's notorious Black Book of Contacts had no fewer than 16 phone numbers for Donald Trump.
	Alan Dershowitz said, in those days, if you didn't know Trump, and if you didn't know Epstein, you were nobody, he told the New York Times.
	Well, I guess Dershowitz is somebody, because he knows them both pretty well, doesn't he?
	Epstein seemed to be a latter-day Hugh Hefner and Trump fit right in.
	Epstein and Maxwell invited him everywhere and Trump reciprocated.
	At one highly selective party in 1992 at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, the New York times reported no fewer than 28 young, attractive women were flown in to participate in a calendar girl competition as entertainment.
	The organizer, George Harani, who ran American dream enterprise, a small Florida company that staged a calendar, calendar girl contest and other events was appalled to learn that there were only two male guests, Donald Trump.
	And Jeffrey Epstein.
	He said, Donald, this is supposed to be a party with VIPs, I told him.
	You're telling me it's just you and Epstein?
	I know Jeff really well.
	I can't have him going after younger girls.
	But Trump ignored his warnings, and he plowed ahead anyway.
	And his longtime girlfriend, Jill Harth, girlfriend of Harani, later told the New York Times that Trump groped her nonstop at a business meeting around the same time.
	He was relentless, she said.
	I didn't know how to handle it.
	I would go away from him.
	I would have to go to the restroom.
	It was an escape route.
	Trump was often the center of Maxwell's attention.
	Women who entered Trump's orbit sometimes ended up being associated with both Trump and Epstein, spending part of their time living in Trump Tower condo and part in Florida at Mar-a-Lago or at one of Epstein's homes.
	Among them was a Russian model, a beauty pageant contestant Anna Malova, whose journey from the world of beauty pageants and modeling to Trump's Mar-a-Lago and Epstein's island retreat is highly suggestive in terms of how Epstein and his associates began manipulating young women.
	In the early 90s, before coming to the US, Malova had placed well in a number of beauty pageants, coming in second in Miss Russia in 1993, winning 1994 Miss Baltic Sea later In 1995, she left Moscow, spent six weeks learning English in St.
	Petersburg, Florida, and was profiled in the Tampa Tribune as the reigning Miss Russia.
	And before long, she met Donald Trump.
	Notwithstanding the fact that Trump was still married to his second wife, Marla Maples, Anna moved into the 30th floor condo in Trump Tower on 5th Avenue.
	So, yeah.
	God created Trump, right?
	You heard that yesterday.
	I mean, he's great.
	Nothing in there about that, right?
	All the models that he's got living with him in his penthouse.
	In October 1996, Trump bought three beauty pageants from ITT Corporation, Miss Universe, Miss USA, Miss Teen USA. A little more than a year later, in 1998, Milova competed in the Miss Universe pageant representing Russia.
	She faltered badly when she was asked to compare Russian television and culture with Ghana's.
	I wouldn't know how to compare those two.
	Anyway, New York Magazine, that's not quite the same as it was with Miss South Carolina when they asked her that stumping question there.
	But anyway, oddly, Anna Malova was allowed to compete in this year's Miss Universe pageant, wrote the New York Magazine.
	Even though she was Miss Russia...
	In 1995, they're writing this in 1998.
	According to Beauty World sources, it's not a coincidence that the stunning Slav, who wound up to be a finalist, is a friend of Donald Trump.
	Did Trump pull a few strings on an old friend's behalf?
	In other words, she was Miss Russia three years ago.
	But now they're pretending she's Miss Russia today to get her into Miss Universe as a finalist.
	In the meantime, however, she spent time with both Trump and Epstein.
	Flight logs released by a federal judge showed that in February, when she was 27, she flew on board Epstein's Gulfstream, the so-called Lolita Express, with Maxwell, Prince Andrew, Back to Florida.
	And she wasn't the only woman who spent time with both Trump and Epstein.
	Trump, in 1997, who just separated from Marla Maples, was photographed with her, with Maxwell, at the Ford Model's 50th anniversary party, where he ogled models throughout the evening.
	Yeah. Yeah, it's amazing.
	And at this point in time, he was, just a couple of years later, He flies Paula White up to his penthouse.
	So tell me about this prosperity gospel stuff.
	As the Epstein operation chugged along, Trump, who had married three models, Ivana, Marla, and Melania, was very much part of Epstein's picture, according to court records.
	Message pads confiscated from Epstein's home showed that Trump called Epstein's West Palm Beach mansion a number of times.
	Asked under oath in September 2016 whether he had ever socialized with Trump in the presence of girls under the age of 18.
	Yeah, that would be the age at which Epstein is no longer interested in them, I guess.
	Epstein punted. Rather than answer the question, he took the fifth.
	Trump became known for hosting parties in suites like the Plaza Hotel, which he owned at the time, where older rich men were introduced to young women and girls who assumed they'd get somewhere by joining the party.
	According to the photographer, the girls were as young as 15.
	They ran over their heads.
	They had no idea.
	They ended up in situations.
	There were always dramas because men threw money and drugs at them to keep them enticed.
	It's based on power and dominating girls who can't push back And can be discarded.
	Trump would go from room to room, said the photographer.
	It was guys with younger girls.
	And a lot of top-shelf liquor and cocaine was being handed out to those people.
	In February 2000, Trump staged a pro-am tennis tournament at Mar-a-Lago, appeared with Epstein, Maxwell, and his latest girlfriend, Melania, who Epstein claims he introduced to Trump.
	So then we go to Ukraine.
	What is the connection in Ukraine?
	Well, again, there's an Epstein connection to child sex trafficking, even in Ukraine.
	Brian Shalhavi has a story.
	While the recent unsealing of documents revealing famous people who were associated with pedophile business leader Jeffrey Epstein...
	Hasn't revealed anything new for those of us who have been exposing this for over a decade now.
	You see? That's why I say this is nothing new for Alex to be, you know, surprised at.
	He's just at a loss for exactly what has been revealed now and how he's going to cover up for Trump.
	I guess the people at Breitbart are doing the same thing, and the people at World Net Daily are doing the same thing, and the people at Gateway Pundit, and on and on and on.
	I go down the list. How are we going to cover for Trump?
	Because our audience wants to believe that he's the Messiah.
	They don't want to know about the 20 years stuff.
	I just read to you a little bit of this stuff.
	These articles go on and on and on.
	There are volumes written about Playboy Trump, and he was on the cover of Playboy.
	Why is it so hard for people to believe that he would do this kind of stuff?
	He is exactly like Bill Clinton.
	Exactly like him.
	Since 2021, we published a Polish filmmaker's documentary called Eyes of the Devil, which documents how babies are trafficked from Poland and Ukraine to child sex brothels in Germany, or literally butchered so their body parts can be sold on the black market.
	Is that hard to believe?
	Is it hard to believe?
	When... We've got the leading cause of death worldwide is abortion, typically being done by mutilation, and frequently in our own government, people like Fauci and the so-called Christian scientist Francis Collins, not the Christian science, but, you know, Francis Collins who presents himself as a Christian.
	These guys working on gain-of-function, trying to make diseases spread, make them more deadly, and then at the same time, Have contracts with abortion centers to chop up babies and harvest their organs.
	That has to be done while you're alive, of course.
	Always does. In China, they have to kill the prisoners while they're alive to harvest their organs.
	They have to do that with the babies as well.
	And then what do they do with the babies' organs that they get?
	Well, Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci are perhaps even worse.
	They're not even using them to save some rich billionaire's life.
	They're using it for their bizarre transhumanist experiments to make humanized mice.
	How sick is that?
	Anyway, yeah, so you don't believe this is a black market where actually killing kids and selling their organs?
	They do it all the time!
	It's called abortion. And of course, the guy who exposed it, again, this woman who was going to release all this stuff, she said, well, people wouldn't believe me, and they wouldn't do anything about it, and it only caused grief for me.
	Take a look at the Center for Medical Progress.
	Look at David Daleiden in California.
	Look at how Lala Harris, and then her successor, Javier Becerra, who is now head of HHS, Which is over the NIH and over Fauci's organization, the NIAID, I think it is, infectious disease thing.
	So again, they put Becerra over the organization that was doing the contracts with the abortion centers in California to harvest the organs and use them in experiments.
	He gets rewarded for coming after the guy who exposes those crimes and And they're going to financially bankrupt him.
	I don't know if there's a jail term there.
	I know that, you know, they're still trying to fight these.
	He's lost these cases in California.
	You know, the courts are corrupted as well.
	And so this guy who's exposing this murder for hire by Planned Parenthood, and the people who came after him, one of them gets to be vice president, the other one gets to be in charge of HHS, which is the organization that was doing, paying for the child trafficking stuff.
	You need to take a clear look at what the American government is.
	Let's not pretend.
	Let's look at it in the eye.
	Let's look into this abyss, not to become what we despise.
	But let's call it what it is.
	As I said before, this American government, this federal government, is doing everything it can To destroy this country.
	They're doing everything they can for global depopulation.
	From Planned Parenthood to the Trump shots.
	And they're unbelievably wicked.
	How can anybody not look at this and see that?
	And yet you've got people cheering Donald Trump as the savior.
	Makes me want to throw up!
	And I have no patience for anybody who wants, at this point in time, in 2024, who wants to defend Trump to me, I'm cutting you off.
	I don't care. You do that on Twitter, goodbye.
	I don't even want to see that.
	If you're that stupid, or if you're that corrupt, you have nothing that I want to hear.
	It's unbelievable. No patience for this at all.
	Not anymore. Journalist Ekaterina Blanova has connected the dots, says Brian Shalhavi, between Clinton Foundation and the trafficked children in Ukraine with the help of Ukrainian First Lady Olena Zelenskaya.
	Karina reports that the Clinton Foundation was, quote, nothing but a vehicle to transform the once broke Ukraine presidential family into a mega multimillionaires and to help their associates get rich also.
	Unsealed court filings over accused sex trafficker Epstein named over 100 rich and powerful people connected to the billionaire pedophile.
	Ironically, back in 2003, Doug Bann, who was one of the people named in these documents, the associate of Bill Clinton, in 2003, Doug Bann helped to kick off the now-famous Clinton Foundation Initiatives.
	With the aim of rehabilitating Bill's post-presidential image, marred by sex scandals, and turning the ex-president into, quote, the world's philanthropist-in-chief, writes Vanity Fair.
	The Clinton Global Initiative, one of the foundation's international projects, was supposedly started in league with Epstein in 2004, early in 2005, according to Charles Ortel.
	And I've interviewed Charles Ortel.
	It's been about... I guess maybe about four or five years since I interviewed him, we talked about the Clinton Foundation.
	What a corrupt organization it was in terms of things that were happening at the time down in Haiti.
	Child trafficking there.
	But here, this is about Ukraine as well.
	That is a global foundation.
	Globally trafficking kids.
	And skirting the law.
	Not complying with any of the paperwork that's required of foundations.
	That's what Charles Hortel pointed out.
	He's a researcher, financial analyst.
	He said the Clinton Foundation's numerous offshoots were nothing but a vehicle to transform the once-broke presidential family into mega-multi-millionaires to help their associates get rich as well.
	The Wall Street analyst is highly skeptical about the Clintons' joint endeavor with the Zelensky's.
	He said, by the time Hillary Clinton commenced work with Ukraine's First Lady, the Clinton family had more than 20 years of experience breaking key charity laws, especially in New York City and in New York State, which to date have targeted Trump and his family for charity frauds, but allowed Clinton charity frauds to expand in scope, scale, and international breadth.
	You see, it is a Game of Thrones.
	Even if they...
	Do the same thing. They are coming after each other.
	That doesn't mean that they are different from each other.
	That's the thing that people can't get over.
	It's like, well, if the Clintons and if the New York Attorney General and the New York District Manhattan DA is coming after Trump, he must be a good guy because I know they're bad.
	It's like, no, they're just with the other family.
	The other crime family.
	The Clinton Global Initiative, the Clinton Foundation, have not complied with laws, says Charles Ortel.
	Concerning public charities, he said, these laws require such entities be controlled by truly independent boards of directors.
	It bars a creation of private gain through their operation, and it forbids partisan political activities.
	But when I talked to him several years ago, he said, look, you know, one thing that is not even open to interpretation is Is that these foundations, like the Clinton Foundation, has to file these reports, and they've never filed a report, ever! Ever!
	Yeah, it's like Hunter Biden.
	He didn't file the tax returns.
	It's not a question.
	Of any of that.
	I mean, they never ever even filed it.
	He said, For any charitable purpose other than housing the presidential records for Bill Clinton's period as president.
	Without complying with applicable state, federal, and foreign laws, Bill Clinton and his cohorts of conspirators then ostensibly raised money for a raft of charitable projects, including Ukraine, for which there has never been any accounting.
	I think we know where the money went.
	And then finally there's this, and I'll quit on this perverted subject.
	You know, there's a lot of stuff going around about Stephen Hawking.
	And a lot of people, a lot of meme, joke memes and things like that.
	But here's the bottom line.
	And the reason this is happening is because there are communications going back and forth.
	And in some emails that Jeffrey Epstein did, he wrote to Ghislaine Maxwell.
	He said, I'll pay cash to any of these people who were on the island with Stephen Hawking who can disprove these allegations that he was involved in an orgy or something, right?
	They never paid anything to anybody.
	What does that tell you? The dog that didn't bark.
	Well, because somebody can say otherwise to this and nobody took him up on the money.
	But beyond that, Beyond that issue is his obsession, Jeffrey Epstein's obsession.
	Why does he have a scientist on Epstein Island anyway, right?
	Yeah, this guy, they're going to go and they're going to have a conference on, you know, science at the island?
	What was that about? And what was the science that they were discussing?
	Well, transhumanism was an obsession of Jeffrey Epstein.
	Isn't it interesting? Then we talk about transhumanism and singularity, which is also something that interested Stephen Hawking because he was crippled and dying in a wheelchair all of his life, couldn't speak, had to, you know, you know the story.
	But, you know, he's imagining that he gets a new body and he can transfer his brain into that new body and understand how attractive that would be to Stephen Hawking.
	But it was also attractive to Jeffrey Epstein.
	The idea that he could, with his money, that he could live forever.
	That he could become like God, of course.
	The oldest aspiration, the oldest lie that was sold to Adam in the garden.
	And so it seems like there's always, with these billionaires, there's always this satanic connection to transhumanism.
	It's there with Elon Musk as well, another hero in the making for the right.
	This guy who dresses up in a satanic costume and is always talking about transhumanism and singularity just like his other pals like Peter Thiel and the rest of them.
	They're focused on this.
	So billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's dream to enhance the human race.
	No, I think it's about destroying the human race.
	It's really behind these unsubstantiated rumors surrounding one of the world's most famous scientists, Stephen Hawking, and the alleged underage orgy.
	Yeah, whether or not there was some kind of orgy going on there that he participated in or watched or whatever, the bottom line is that this is about the destruction of the human race.
	This is about transhumanism.
	This is the underlying philosophy of Davos and the globalists, and has always been.
	It's the underlying philosophy of the technocracy.
	They believe science will make them like God.
	Science will let them live forever.
	And all they need is money and power to get that.
	That deception is what makes them so dangerous.
	I'm sure that Stephen Hawkins just read Playboy for the intellectual articles.
	And I'm sure that he just went to Epstein Island because they wanted to talk about science projects, right?
	Except the science project itself.
	It's perhaps one of the worst aspects of this.
	There's no suggestion that any of these scientists were involved in wrongdoing.
	Purely coincidental. Nothing to see here.
	The details of Epstein's attempts to quash the rumor were revealed in a poorly written email.
	Again, we offered to pay a bounty to somebody that could disprove it.
	But evidently, Nobody could.
	In particular, he wrote that he wanted to debunk claims about a dinner with Bill Clinton and a rumor about Stephen Hawking participating in an orgy on Epstein Island.
	So, where does that leave us with his views on transhumanism?
	That is the key. And it's already been reported in the past that Epstein had plans to enhance the human race via mass impregnation.
	Again, because he's better than other people, right?
	So he's a eugenicist as well.
	That's what these people are. I'm better than everybody else.
	I'm an elitist. My genes need to be promulgated.
	I, you know, I'm a different species than the rest of you people.
	He pointed to a New York Times article published in 2019, which revealed his interest in transhumanism.
	He said that one scientist claimed that Epstein's goal was to impregnate 20 women at a time at his Zorro ranch in New Mexico.
	Well, it turns out that we have a clip of some of what they were talking about at this conference.
	About transhumanism.
	About improving the quality of the human race.
	By bringing in a lot of young women and breeding with them.
	Here's the clip. I guess this is from Epstein Island.
	I would not rule out the chance to preserve a nucleus of human specimens.
	It would be quite easy.
	At the bottom of some of our deeper mineshafts.
	You mean people could actually stay down there for a hundred years?
	It would not be difficult, my inferiority.
	Nuclear reactors could...
	I'm sorry, Mr.
	President. Nuclear reactors could provide power almost indefinitely.
	Greenhouses could maintain plant life.
	Animals could be bred and slaughtered.
	I would hate to have to decide who stays up and who goes down.
	That would not be necessary, Mr.
	President. Could easily be accomplished with a computer.
	And the computer could be set and programmed to accept factors from youth, health, sexual fertility, intelligence, and a cross-section of necessary skills.
	Of course it would be absolutely vital that our top government and military men be included to foster and impart the required principles of leadership and tradition.
	Actually, they would breathe prodigiously, eh?
	There would be much time and little to do.
	But with the proper breeding techniques and the ratio of, say, ten females to each male, I would guess that they could then work their way back to the present gross national product within, say, twenty years.
	Isn't it amazing how things really don't change?
	Again, going back to the very first man, all these desires, right, to live forever, to become like God, are the desires that you see portrayed in Dr.
	Strangelove by Stanley Kubrick.
	He knows, or knew, the desires of this inner circle very well, didn't he?
	Things really have not changed.
	On Rumble, Geesebusters, good to see you there.
	He says, David's 100% right.
	Trump and Clinton are the same.
	They played everyone.
	That's the point. That's what I've been trying to tell people for especially this last hour.
	Can't people see this?
	And it is just so blind.
	You've got the people who support Clinton no matter what, no matter how many women come forward and talk about violent sexual assault and rape.
	They don't care. And Ken Starr didn't care.
	And Ken Starr was one of the defense attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, along with Alan Dershowitz.
	And, of course, the prosecutor that was there, who yielded to the federal agreement for non-prosecution, said, stay away from this guy.
	He's ours. He gets rewarded by a position in the Trump Cabinet Secretary of Labor, Alex Acosta.
	So, again...
	It just keeps going around, doesn't it?
	Can't people see this?
	On Rock Fan Handy, Trump was playing 90 Chinese tic-tac-toe as a quintuple agent to expose the global elite.
	Yeah, that's the ticket.
	That may be what Alex is going to come up with.
	I think that may be it.
	On Rumble, Stealth Patriot.
	Ignorance is bliss. Just get Trump back in office and he will save us all.
	That's the zeitgeist that's going on right now.
	It truly is amazing. Less than a week.
	Before the election season starts with the Iowa caucus, and that's where we are right now.
	hear news now at APSRadioNews.com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story.
	This is a recording of the APS Radio News.
	Liberty.
	It's your move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Yeah, just one last thing, which I didn't mention.
	And that is, this article here.
	In terms of ransom, the person who said, well, I'm going to blow this up.
	I'm going to expose all these people.
	They're the same, you know, saying exactly the same thing as Epstein's brother said.
	And some of the things that she said...
	Or that some of these women talked about how not only how they were with Trump, but how violent he was with them.
	In the same way that, you know, Clinton was alleged to have bitten women, that type of thing.
	That kind of abuse that is there.
	Almost like a rape, right?
	Because they're men in power.
	And of course, you know, Allegations against both of them.
	Multiple allegations of rape.
	And she said, I know this one woman who was on her way.
	She said, I know that she had sexual relations with Trump.
	At Jeffrey's New York mansion on regular occasions, I once met her for coffee, met Jen for coffee, just before she was going to meet Trump and Epstein together at his mansion and so forth.
	So, yeah, I'm sure there's nothing to any of this, right?
	Now, let's take a look at what is happening with search term search warrants.
	Very much like geospatial or geofencing warrants.
	That's what I want to take a look at.
	But let's begin by taking a look at World Magazine.
	They are wringing their hands that the younger generation, what they call the Gen Z people, and this would be people that I guess at this point...
	They're like from 10 years old to their early 20s.
	That generation is getting all their news from TikTok instead of TV. Well, first of all, I don't know really how serious the consumers they are of news at that age.
	But, you know, they're very concerned about this.
	And I looked at it and I thought, what's the difference?
	You know, Walter Cronkite.
	And, you know, all these guys who would tell you, that's the way it is.
	And they had three half-hour news shows with commercials interspersed with them, and they would all cover the same issues and tell you the same thing about all of them.
	So what is different about TikTok?
	Well, the thing that makes social media different in terms of the news stuff, again, it's going to be lies and propaganda narrative for the most part.
	But what's different about social media is the feedback.
	The feedback. They can look to see how you are accepting or rejecting their agenda, and they can fine-tune it.
	And that's what makes social media, social platforms, so dangerous.
	They said social platforms are now the primary news source for one in five Americans.
	It is a completely pre-programmed electorate far behind.
	Well, of course, they've been programming people for the elections for quite some time, again.
	But again, it lets them do it in a fine-tuned way.
	They have closed the feedback loop, if you want to talk about systems.
	And so instead of this open loop where they can't really tell how well it's working, they can tell exactly how well it's working.
	Today, 19% of Americans regularly get their news through social media.
	Overall, Americans just don't follow the news as closely as they used to, however.
	A Pew Research study found that unique visitors to the top 50 news outlets dropped 20% in 2022.
	Skepticism about the reliability of mass media may be contributing to that trend.
	I wonder why people be skeptical after what happened in 2020 and 2021 and 2022.
	They see people dying in front of them, and these people always coming up with a lie.
	Telling them to put masks on their faces?
	You think that doesn't hurt the credibility of these people?
	Did they jump the shark with that?
	Well, they did if we act quickly enough.
	But if we don't act quickly enough, if we're going to wake up slowly out of this dystopian nightmare that Trump and other people put in place in 2020, then they are going to take us to war before we go to war with them.
	And then once that happens, Once they start a war, you think this hero worship of Trump is crazy?
	It doesn't matter who is president.
	People will fall in line behind that guy.
	It really doesn't matter.
	I saw this when we went to China.
	Even after Mao is dead, even after everybody knows about how he killed tens of millions of his own countrymen, they're still selling his memorabilia.
	We got Mao pictures all over the place, big posters all over the place.
	People were buying pictures of Mao, getting his little red book and all the rest of the stuff.
	It's like, this guy has killed more Chinese people than anybody else.
	Take a look at Benjamin Netanyahu, the guy who used his own people as lab rats for Pfizer.
	And when a war begins, everybody closes ranks behind him, and he knows that.
	The worst leaders know that.
	And it's why they start wars.
	Overall, Americans just don't follow the news as closely as they used to, right?
	So about 20% of them.
	Back in the 1970s, about 70% of Americans said they trusted newspapers, TV, and radio.
	Only 40% said the same thing in 2020.
	And I remember those days.
	And again, it's because it was a monolithic thing, because you had no other sources of information.
	And that's what they were trying to get back to.
	That's what the cancel stuff is all about.
	That's what NewsGuard is all about.
	It's to try to shut down alternative sources of information.
	They don't want people to have that.
	The Center for Information Resiliences, Benjamin Strick, told The Atlantic that TikTok allowed his team to monitor Russian troop movements.
	Because they're using it heavily as well.
	Eighty to ninety percent of the videos they were able to document and verify were originally posted to TikTok by civilians, he said.
	The war in Ukraine has been dubbed the first TikTok war.
	And so when we look at this and what does social media news and fake news do, it amplifies the content, they said, more likely to stimulate user engagement.
	The sensational stuff is what people are going to look at.
	You know, Huntley Brinkley Report come in with Beethoven's Ninth Symphony.
	And they spoke in very controlled terms and that type of thing.
	Walter Cronkite, very controlled conservative terms and anything.
	They wouldn't get five people watching them today.
	You know, you got to do something sensational.
	You got to put on, you got to be theatrical.
	Sensational. That's what Alex knows so well, quite frankly.
	The Reuters Institute found most users don't like this idea that socials are serving up news items that are not important and that they're being programmed.
	And yet, people continue to respond to this programming, guaranteeing that they'll get more of what they're already looking for, thereby skewing their perception of world events.
	You know, it's funny, isn't it?
	Because it's kind of like, you know, the grocery store cereal boxes and stuff that, you know, they always knew how to manipulate public opinion.
	Edward Bernays did it for Woodrow Wilson for World War I. Then he goes to Madison Avenue and everybody looks at commercials and go, these commercials are awful.
	They just insult our intelligence on TV. And yet it worked.
	They would buy those products.
	And the same thing is true today.
	Look at this. Garbage on TikTok.
	It insults our intelligence, and yet they buy that narrative, don't they?
	They really do. Gen Z doesn't appear to be any less concerned about global events than older Americans, but they may be substantially less informed.
	About a third of Gen Z respondents in a recent poll said they didn't feel fully prepared before voting in 2022 midterms.
	Those who felt unprepared said they got their information from social media.
	Yeah, and I think when I look throughout all this, right?
	Again, we're talking about Gen Z. I had to look them up to see what age groups were talking about.
	You know, people born in the late 90s to early 2010s.
	So we're talking about people that are, you know, from, you know, 10 years or so old to the early 20s.
	Where do we get these labels from?
	Well, we got them from the fourth turning.
	Just before they wrote the fourth turning, Strauss and Howe wrote a book called Generations, and they came up with these labels like millennials and things like that.
	Everybody talks about the labels, but everybody ignores the central premise.
	Of the fact that we are in a turning point.
	All the institutions are being changed.
	They ignore the time and the season that we are in.
	It truly is amazing to see that happen.
	And it is everywhere.
	The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by Elon Musk's X on disclosing federal surveillance.
	The Supreme Court yesterday refused to hear an appeal by X that challenged a ban on the company disclosing the number, the number of times the federal authorities sought surveillance of Americans and foreign nationals using Twitter or now X.
	They'd argued that the federal government's prohibition on the company disclosing the exact number of receipts of national security-related requests for surveillance of users was unconstitutional, and it should only be granted in exceptional cases.
	Again, they want people to see how heavy the hand of government control is on social media, and the government at all levels.
	people to see how heavy the hand of government control is on social media.
	And the government at all levels, from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, where they lost, to now the Supreme Court, which refused to even listen to the case, and so now the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals case will stand. The Ninth Circuit Court held that restrictions on free speech related to receiving requests for surveillance related to
	national security concerns is not subject to procedural requirements that would mandate judicial review.
	So if you say that something is a national security issue, the laws don't apply.
	If you say that this is a pandemic and public health is at risk, no laws apply.
	Isn't it amazing?
	How easy it has become for our government to just sweep away all laws, regulations, and the Constitution itself.
	Oh, no, this is about national security.
	And yet they turn this all inside out and upside down.
	When you look at the FISA court, why was that there?
	Well, because in the 1970s, they realized that from its inception, right after World War II, both the CIA and the NSA, which was created by executive order, had been spying on Americans unconstitutionally, without a warrant.
	And so they created the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
	As part of that, they created a FISA court.
	And the FISA court was going to say, well, we'll let you surveil foreign citizens in foreign countries, but that's it.
	And you come before us and we'll give you a warrant for that.
	And, you know, we're not going to have a public court here because of security issues, because of national security concerns.
	And so, what happened to all of that?
	Well, the FISA court became a tool to give them legal cover for doing surveillance of everybody in America.
	As we saw happening back in 2013, a decade ago.
	James Clapper and the Snowden leaks.
	So, the lawsuit from Twitter, or X, had sought the right to publicly reveal the exact number of times in a six-month period that it received a national security order requesting information about users.
	You're not supposed to know.
	How hell-bent on knowing everything about us and surveilling us on their platform.
	You're not allowed to know that.
	You see, if they were to reveal that number, what would people say?
	You know, would they say, and that's an interesting game that Elon Musk is playing.
	Would people say, well, I'm just not going to go that platform?
	Or would they say, we've got to stop it from the government?
	And I think he's playing the game and understanding that I think most people would say, well, how in the world can the government be doing that many requests for surveillance of people on social media?
	And so that brings us to the keyword search warrant.
	The keyword search warrant.
	Think about search engines, right?
	Google. It was originally designed to help you find information about the world and things that you're interested in, right?
	Then, it transformed itself into a search engine that was designed to hide things that the government didn't want you to see.
	You know, like me, for instance.
	Ha ha ha ha ha! So it went from a search engine to help you find things to a search engine to hide things about the government.
	And now it's going the next stage.
	At the behest of the government, these keyword search warrants will allow the government to search for you and to search your life.
	And to find out things about you, while Google keeps things about the government hidden from you.
	Everything in our lives is supposed to be open and transparent to the government, while everything that they do to us is to be hidden behind a pseudo veil of national security.
	That's where we are. And that tells you everything that you need to know.
	This is from Reclaim the Net.
	One such method is the keyword search warrant.
	Unlike conventional warrants, these warrants do not target a person or a place, but are based on specific search terms used by individuals on search engines, social media, and other online platforms.
	In other words, agencies are finding information on everyone who searched for a specific term.
	This is another example of how they completely invert and pervert every aspect of the Constitution.
	What does the Fourth Amendment say? You've got to be specific about the person and the place and the things that you're looking for on a search warrant, right?
	Well, this doesn't have any of that.
	All that is swept away.
	And they've done this type of thing in the past, too, with their geofence warrants or their geospatial warrants where they say, well, they go to the phone companies, the cell phone companies, and say, we want to know, give us the information about all the people whose phones were on and talking to cell phone towers within this geographical area at such and such a time.
	There was a crime that happened here.
	And so now you all become suspects simply because you were in the area.
	They don't have any real reason to make you a suspect.
	And, of course, we saw this on steroids in January the 6th.
	We talked about this for quite some time.
	But that's probably the best-known example of that.
	And not just that, but, you know, Bank of America going and saying, well, I can tell you all the people who are doing transactions.
	Anywhere around the Washington area on January the 6th.
	And also, I'll give you the list of anybody who bought a gun that was in that area also.
	So tie those two things together, FBI. The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures.
	And that's the little word games that they play.
	Well, it's not unreasonable for us to get that information on you if a crime was committed somewhere.
	It's perfectly reasonable for us to search you.
	No, it's not. An unreasonable search is then defined as something that is not about a particular person, place, thing, that type of thing.
	It doesn't have that kind of specificity or reason.
	So keyword search warrants are inherently overbroad, indiscriminate, potentially infringing on...
	The Bill of Rights doesn't give us any rights.
	It recognizes our God-given rights and prohibits the government from interfering with them as it is always doing now.
	Thank you.
	Thank you. So they highlighted the danger of these warrants implicating innocent individuals who might have innocuously searched for terms that law enforcement links to criminal activity.
	The same way that the geospatial warrants implicate innocent people who just happen to be in a large area.
	As again, we saw on January the 6th.
	And so... Where is this leading?
	Well, Michael Snyder has an article about AI, right?
	They have been collecting so much information on everybody.
	And now they've got, with artificial intelligence, they're bringing in the tools to be able to analyze all of this stuff, to collate all of this stuff.
	You know, for the longest time, and one of the things about the East German Stasi, Well, they had so much information and so many informants, everybody snitching on everybody else.
	They couldn't sort through all of it.
	They didn't have enough people to sort through all of it.
	Well, now AI solves that problem.
	And it's a very dangerous thing for all of us because the NSA, for decades, has been stashing away everything on the Internet, everything on social media and all these other things.
	A massive facility in Utah.
	I think it's Bluffdale, if I remember correctly.
	And using massive amounts of electricity, massive amounts of water, even before they started complaining about this, you know, saying, well, we can't have cryptocurrency that's based on proof of work because it just uses too much electricity, blah, blah, blah.
	They were using more than an entire city did out in the desert, more water than an entire city would, more power than an entire city would.
	And that's just one of their places.
	They've got at least another one back in Maryland.
	They've been saving everything.
	And, you know, I talked to the former global head of the NSA's technical stuff, William Binney.
	He said, you know, when they're talking about the Russian nonsense and everything, he goes, they know what the truth is.
	They've got all this stuff stored.
	They could go back and take a look at it.
	They're bluffing everybody with this stuff.
	So they've got it there. And now, not just for the interesting people, as Michael Hayden said, we're interested in the interesting people.
	Well, if you're not a person of interest to them, in other words, you don't oppose them politically in some way, shape, or form, because they don't care about criminals.
	It's just their political enemies that they care about.
	You don't have to be a person of interest.
	They can use artificial intelligence to make you a person of interest.
	To go back and mine this information that they've been saving.
	Every inch of our planet is being watched and incredibly sophisticated artificial intelligence solutions make it possible for those that are watching our planet to find whatever they want in just minutes.
	Once your face has been identified, AI can be used to locate you wherever you pop up on the entire planet.
	And now there's cameras everywhere.
	One company that is catering to this tyranny...
	There's a company called SynthetAI.
	I don't know how to pronounce this.
	It's like synthetic with an AIC at the end of it.
	According to NPR, it really can find anything that you want anywhere in the world.
	And so, as they describe it, they say for decades, cameras have been watching over cities, businesses, even homes, but that footage has mainly been stored locally and And reviewing it took a pair of human eyes.
	Not anymore. AI systems can now hunt for a van in a city, scan license plates, and even faces in real time.
	And again, it wasn't just kept locally.
	They're combining into these massive databases and have been doing so for decades.
	Being able to scan the vast coastline of a nation like Russia is why this kind of technology has caught the eye of big government intelligence agencies.
	See, it's not about enslaving us.
	It's about protecting us from Russia, you see.
	You believe that?
	Anyway, watching everything that needs to be watched has always been a labor-intensive business.
	Even in George Orwell's 1984, the all-seeing thought police struggled to keep up, as did the Stasi in East Germany.
	And as I said before, now the Stasi is becoming Stas AI. A five-year strategic partnership with Microsoft and this company that I can't pronounce, Synthetic or something like that.
	Again, why is it always Microsoft at the center of all this?
	Microsoft at the center of NewsGuard.
	Microsoft at the center of ElectionGuard.
	Microsoft at the center of the CCPA, the Coalition for Content, Provenance, Authentication, and of course, censorship.
	We're going to see who created this, and we're going to keep it from being even uploaded on the internet.
	Always Microsoft.
	Microsoft with money from DARPA. Election Guard was funded with a $10 million grant from DARPA to a subsidiary of Microsoft, and that was the only funding they had.
	100% funded by DARPA. Laundering it through Microsoft.
	And so here's Microsoft again, a five-year strategic partnership with this company.
	Microsoft is going to provide information about people, right?
	By the beginning of the prisoner.
	What do you want? Information.
	And you are a number, okay?
	And well, you won't get it.
	Well, by hook or by crook, they will.
	DARPA will pay Microsoft to do that, to turn that over.
	Access to nearly 1 million hours of cloud compute resources.
	And so that's the data that Microsoft brings to the table to give to this company.
	I would not be surprised to see if, like these other ventures, it is funded also by DARPA. And again, you know, when you look at Microsoft and Bill Gates as kind of the Moriarty of all this stuff, his ID2020. Got to get everybody an ID in 2020.
	Well, they essentially established that principle with the pandemic and the vaccine passports.
	It's a so-called pandemic.
	You all know that I don't believe it was a pandemic.
	And then with the immunization agenda, the IA 2030.
	Always Bill Gates at the center of this.
	Isn't that interesting? So, most of us As Michael Snyder points out, most of us willingly hand them the troves of personal information.
	When people said that the total information awareness program was too creepy, we don't want the government doing that, well, then they started Facebook the next day.
	And that is essentially life log.
	And you put the data in yourself.
	If you own an EV or a digital car, you better watch out what you say, because you might be under total surveillance there, and that goes for the passengers as well.
	And who will your data be sold to?
	Well, it'll be sold to a lot of companies who will then turn around and sell it to DARPA, the NSA, or whoever the highest bidder is.
	We've reached a stage where virtually everything we do is monitored, put into a database somewhere.
	And with each passing day, the surveillance prison that is being constructed all around us becomes ever more intrusive.
	So where is this all ultimately going?
	And as Snyder says, we might want to think about that.
	Because we're moving into one of the most chaotic periods in all of human history.
	Again, people talk about the generations, labels, millennials, and so forth, but they don't look at the season and the time that we're in.
	And so, Palantir, this company that I've talked about for a long time, they use the name and even the logo is the Palantir from the Lord of the Rings, the crystal balls.
	They are one of the key...
	Data mining companies out there.
	A lot of contracts with the CIA. Peter Thiel was one of the people who started this company as well.
	But they sell their services for the most part to the CIA. But they've got a big contract that they're working on in the UK for the national health system.
	And there's people in the UK that say, I don't think we want that.
	We know what Palantir is about.
	It's a police state, surveillance state, a CIA client.
	We don't want them having access to all of our health records.
	And so they've got some companies that are working to say, we don't want Palantir having access to this.
	We don't want the eye of Sauron looking at national health system data.
	Leaked emails reveal that the tech giant Palantir has hired a public relations company.
	Topham Guerin to pay influencers to attack the Good Law Project on social media.
	So the people who are opposing Palantir on social media, they're saying, we don't want this CIA agency and this police state surrogate, we don't want them controlling the data on NHS. And so Palantir puts out a hit on them on social media, hires a company. The Good Law Project is a not-for-profit campaign organization, said that they want to see law used for a better world.
	We know that the law, in the right hands, can be fair and a decent force for good.
	It is a practical tool for positive change and can make amazing things happen, they say.
	And so as they oppose this, the Good Law Project has indeed been raising concerns about the 330 million pound deal between Palantir and the UK government to process their medical records of everybody in the UK. And they said, we're not the only ones who have raised questions over Palantir's contract.
	NHS patients, cross-party members of parliament, civil libertarian groups, many other organizations like the British Medical Association are all concerned about it.
	And so Palantir teams up with a PR company to do character assassination on social media.
	While they also work to purge people on social media.
	You know, one of the things that I just came across this last week I thought was kind of interesting.
	And it explains a lot about why my piece about the creation of the Federal Reserve was purged.
	When it first came out, I think it was 1946.
	It was right after the war.
	The FBI has now been revealed.
	It took a while for the information to come out.
	There's been several articles about it from a lot of different people.
	The FBI said, these people are portraying bankers in a negative light.
	We can't have that. These people are subversive.
	They're probably communists because that's what they would call their enemies.
	You know, everybody was a communist.
	If you had anything that was critical about the federal government or critical about bankers, oh, well, that would make you a communist.
	And so they said, well, these people must be communists.
	We should investigate that.
	So that explains a lot.
	You know, when I do a piece talking about the creation of the Federal Reserve...
	I wonder who was behind that order to do the censorship on YouTube.
	We'll be right back. If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com.
	This is a test.
	Thank you.
	What is going on in the House?
	Well, we've got a $1.6 trillion bill that the new conservative Speaker Mike Johnson has agreed with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.
	$1.66 trillion next year.
	Looks very much like the agreement between Kevin McCarthy and Joe Biden.
	And a lot of conservatives are pointing that out.
	I think we've been had.
	I kind of thought that as soon as he was made speaker, he starts talking about how we can get money to Ukraine.
	He was somebody who had, as a member, opposed funding the war in Ukraine.
	And now he's looking for how he can use it.
	And of course, he's not just giving them a blank check.
	He's using it as a negotiating chip.
	But why are we bargaining with war?
	He says he's a Christian. Why are you bargaining with this corrupt regime, sending money to this corrupt regime, and continuing this war?
	The deal that McCarthy had reached was the very thing that led to his removal.
	Ousted by members of his own party through a motion to vacate, and Johnson could face his own motion to vacate by conservatives, unhappy with his budget deal.
	Um... So the House Freedom Caucus wrote on Twitter, it is even worse than we thought.
	Don't believe the spin. Once you break through the typical Washington math, the true total programmatic spending level is $1.658 trillion, not $1.59 trillion.
	They're talking about rounding errors here now.
	That's the best they can do.
	This is a total failure, said the House Freedom Caucus.
	Political consultant Jay Townsend told Newsweek the idea of ousting Johnson is likely to come up in caucus meetings on the floor and in the hallways among Republican members.
	But they are so thin on a majority right now that he might get ousted just on that basis.
	Because they only have, with people retiring and leaving, they've only got a one-seat majority.
	Can't get any tighter than that.
	If anybody refuses to vote for something on the Republican side, they lose.
	Because, of course, the Democrats are going to hang together.
	And so, as we're talking about the surveillance state and what is in view here...
	So at the beginning of the program, I wanted to give you a heads up about two very important information sources.
	I'm going to just give you a taste of it.
	Hopefully it'll get you more interested to do more research of your own.
	The first one is by Aaron.
	It's an article by Aaron Day on Brownstone Institute.
	And in it, he has a fictional account about life under CBDC. And he calls it the final countdown to CBDC. He says, although this is fiction, it draws on all the things that we know, the technologies that they have put in place.
	They're not putting them in place.
	They're in place. They just have not thrown the switch yet to activate them politically.
	He said, and here's his fictional version.
	It took barely a decade for the world they knew to crumble.
	After a series of planned economic crises and the rise of authoritarian regimes, the world saw the widespread adoption of social credit systems and central bank digital currencies.
	By 2032, New York City, once bustling with life and energy, had been transformed into a dystopian nightmare.
	The U.S., previously a symbol of freedom and democracy, had succumbed to digital tyranny.
	Despair, hopelessness filled the city with a relentless onslaught of propaganda on the airwaves and the constant hum of drones overhead, casting dark, oppressive shadows on the streets below.
	In this grim reality, the universal basic income concept, you know, the stimulus check that was introduced by Trump, Lockdown, we're going to close your business, close your work, take your job, just like that.
	But it's okay. I'm going to give you a little bit of money.
	It's exactly the same thing that Bloomberg was saying when he was running for president in 2020.
	He says, we're looking for a way to take everybody's job, but the smart ones of us out there.
	But we've got to find a way to keep people from coming after us with guillotines.
	And so what we'll do is we'll give people cash, universal basic income.
	So the universal basic income...
	twisted into a means of subjugation.
	No, it wasn't twisted.
	And it's always been planned to be that.
	Although everyone received UBI, the amount depended on an individual's social credit score.
	High scores guaranteed a comfortable lifestyle.
	Low scores condemned people to destitution.
	Society had devolved into a ruthless game of paranoia, compliance and survival.
	Healthcare access was strictly controlled.
	People could be required to justify their presence or their whereabouts at any time.
	Vaccine passports are not only mandatory, but weaponized to control access to public spaces, transportation, and some jobs.
	The social credit system, I'll say just as Jabsinda Arden in New Zealand was asked by that reporter, well, it sounds like you're setting up two classes of people.
	Yep, yep, that's what it is.
	Yep, yep. And she smiles and laughs about it.
	Social credit system ensnared entire families with the scores of each member affecting every aspect of their lives.
	Those with low scores found themselves trapped in substandard housing, with limited transportation options, with inadequate health care.
	And so in his fictional story, Jason and Kristen and this family bore the weight of knowing a time before, before the Bureau of Global Nations centralized and controlled every aspect of life.
	They shared stories with Wyatt and Emily, their children, of a freer past, recounting cherished memories of family picnics in Central Park and laughter-filled movie nights hoping to instill their children with a value of liberties that they remembered and still loved.
	Halting this relentless march demands awareness and decisive action.
	The time for complacency or the belief that this could never happen in America has long passed, he writes.
	As part of the book, the downfall, or the fictional story that he has, the downfall begins when the husband passionately and tries to anonymously oppose a policy, and that's the beginning of the end for them.
	As he goes on to say, Aaron Day says, the technologies and systems discussed here are not mere concepts.
	They've already been tried.
	And many of them have already been adopted in the United States.
	At the heart of this dystopian nightmare lies the CBDC, Which empowers governments to manipulate behavior through social credit scores, through vaccine passports, and more.
	By leveraging digital, programmable, sensible money, stopping CBDCs can thwart everything else.
	The solution is clear, though not as simplistic as casting a vote.
	It really isn't. You vote in the marketplace.
	You vote by using cash.
	is a far more effective weapon against CBDC than anything that you might do on election day, especially in terms of your votes for federal office.
	Again, every day you get to vote.
	That's the key thing about markets.
	And if you don't vote for the stuff that you like, it will disappear.
	And so you want to have, as we pointed out, you want to have something that is private, something that is analog, that is outside of the digital system.
	They want to put everybody into this digital control network.
	And so you want to have something that is outside of that.
	Cash, gold, things like that that are going to be outside of that.
	And use the cash.
	So that it doesn't disappear as an option, as we've already seen happen in several Western countries.
	People stopped using cash because it's more convenient, and we know it is, to pull out plastic.
	And so it got to where it was a low enough use.
	They just said, fine, it goes away.
	And people didn't complain about it.
	And so we've got to not take that path of least resistance.
	Members of Congress who draw power from their monopolistic control of currency are unlikely to vote for a reduction in their control or their authority.
	The true power resides with the people.
	You see? Just like this $1.6 trillion from this new conservative speaker.
	They're not going to get rid of their real power.
	He talks about Ukraine now.
	He uses it as a bargaining chip for his power.
	He doesn't care about war and peace.
	He doesn't care about crime and corruption and all this money just disappearing.
	He doesn't care about it.
	By divesting from unstable fiat currencies, we, in going to self-custody cryptocurrency, gold or silver, we can prevent the implementation of CBDCs and safeguard our liberties.
	And so he says, time is of the essence.
	We have less than 12 months to act.
	I think that's interesting. Why does he say that?
	I think perhaps... He says that because he understands the time frame that we're on.
	He understands that this next presidency, whoever is president, is going to be weaponizing this stuff against us.
	What we're looking at is, in a sense, it's very important because it's kind of like a hostile nation on our border.
	And they're trying to decide between Hitler and Stalin, for example.
	And so we know that it's going to take a little bit different approach depending on who they put in there.
	But we know that either Hitler or Stalin is going to be attacking us.
	That's a guarantee. Either Biden or Trump or whatever other puppet they choose to put in there is going to be attacking us.
	And so we have to act now.
	The next president is going to take us through this great reset, through this great taking.
	And that's the other article I want to talk about here, The Great Taking, written by David Webb.
	He's also done a documentary.
	If you haven't seen it, I would suggest it.
	You can find it in a number of different places.
	I think Children's Health Defense has it.
	They've got a link to it here on Brownstone and the rest of this.
	Before I get into that, I just want to read some of the comments here.
	And thanks to the people who have left tips.
	That's very kind. Thank you, Geese Busters.
	Thank you very much. I appreciate that.
	He says, it was a great show today.
	Well, thank you. Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip.
	He said, if a lot were tasked to go into Washington, D.C., Define one righteous man.
	He would just find a bunch of rapist sodomites all over again.
	That's pretty much true.
	That is not our country there.
	They don't represent us.
	It's Rome on the Potomac, as some people said.
	On Rumble, Grant777, thank you for the tip.
	He says, people support Trump because of the economy.
	The first three years, he did not actively try to destroy it, but the last one, he did so much that, you know, it hangs in the balance in their minds.
	I agree. You know, it was...
	Again, the first three years, when we look at the economy, if the government...
	Doesn't actively try to destroy the economy.
	It starts to recover. And that's the way it was the first three years.
	But he made up for it in the fourth year.
	Biden, on the other hand, began with a vengeance to try to destroy our energy independence and other things like that.
	On Rumble, Gamma...
	Kur... Kuria... I don't know how to pronounce it.
	Anyway, thank you very much. Presents.
	Gamma Kur... Kur... Kujura presents.
	I believe it's Gamma Kujira.
	Kujira? Kujira? Okay.
	All right. Well, there we go.
	Travis has a skill I didn't know about, his knowledge of Japanese.
	Okay. He watches a lot of anime, he says.
	Okay. Thank you for the tip.
	He says, great show, David. The 666 Beast of Revelation is here.
	It's Prince MBS of Esau Arabia.
	He'll make peace with Israel, then tribulation will start.
	Check out the Prince of the Covenant on Rumble.
	And on Rumble, North American House Hippo, thank you for the tip.
	Says, with regard to Mr.
	Trump, please let me state this using the most eloquent language this college miseducated bus driver can muster.
	Trump can peregrinate to the realm in which Satan is denizen.
	The realm of Satan will be transformed into an icy pit before I ever forgive that scion of omnivorous female people.
	Quadruped for his betrayals.
	May Satan find Trump's head as tasty as Judas Iscariot's.
	Yeah, it was interesting.
	You know, it was a sermon this Sunday.
	The pastor was talking about Judas, and he begins by giving an example for Americans of a traitor.
	He talks about Benedict Arnold, and he starts talking about it, and we just started...
	Chuckling, Karen and I, because I've referred to Donald Trump so much as Benedict Donald, and of course, all the different attributes that he mentioned were there in Benedict Donald, the same attributes as Benedict Arnold.
	On Rockfin, Angela Oswald says, David referred to Ruby Ridge yesterday.
	Can anyone refer me to sources that I can research the truth on this?
	I sadly believe the news on this, too.
	Well, you know, there was the lawyer...
	Who defended him? I can't remember the guy's name now.
	Very flamboyant lawyer.
	Never lost a case.
	He would always wear like cowboy clothes.
	He had like this leather coat with fringe on it and things like that.
	I can't remember. Maybe you could look it up for me, Travis.
	And William Spence.
	Gary Spence.
	Gary Spence. Yeah. He actually, you know, the Ruby Ridge situation, he got a big judgment from the federal government for wrongful death.
	But of course, they never punished Lon Horiuchi, the FBI sniper, who at point-blank range executed Randy Weaver's wife.
	She was staying there holding a baby, shot her right between the eyes at point-blank range with his sniper rifle while she's holding the baby.
	Sank to the floor. They took the baby out of her arms, but there's a lot about that.
	That is so maybe I believe that Gary Spence wrote a book about it.
	That might be a good place to start because he won.
	Well, I can't say justice.
	You can't bring back his family members that were killed, his son that was killed, his wife that was killed.
	And Randy Weaver really never recovered from that as far as I could tell.
	But that'd be a great place to start with Spence's book.
	I'm sure he wrote something about it.
	So, The Great Taking.
	And you've seen this mentioned quite a bit.
	I'll read you a little bit of excerpts from it so that you can get the free book or watch the free documentary.
	It's by David Webb. He introduces it and he says, what is this book about?
	Well, it's about the taking of collateral.
	All of it.
	The endgame of this globally synchronous debt accumulation supercycle.
	This is being executed by long-planned intelligent design, the audacity and the scope of which is difficult for the mind to encompass.
	Included are all financial assets, all money on deposit at banks, all stocks and all bonds, and hence all underlying property of all public corporations, including all inventories, all plant and equipment, all land, all mineral deposits, all inventions and intellectual property, privately owned personal and real property financed with any amount of debt.
	That's the key thing. If you don't own it outright, if there's any debt, it'll be taken.
	As will assets of privately owned businesses, which have been financed with debt.
	If even partially successful, this will be the greatest conquest and subjugation in world history.
	We're now living, he says, in a hybrid war conducted almost entirely by deception, and thus designed to achieve war aims with little energy input.
	It is a war of conquest directed not against other nation states, but against all of humanity.
	Presently, as we all know, families are divided, people are experiencing all kinds of isolation, perhaps not physically, but in spirit and in mind.
	This has been made to happen through the dark magic of false news and false narrative.
	This alone has been a great crime against humanity.
	The tactical purposes are many.
	To confuse, to divide, to cause disengagement, to demoralize, to instill fears and to introduce false focal points for these fears, to manipulate the historical narrative, to create a false sense of the present reality, and ultimately to cause people to acquiesce to what has been planned.
	And let me just interject here.
	We have our guest coming up at the top of the hour.
	It's a comedian who has pushed against this, and he has correctly identified what the central issue is, and that is how they seek to divide us and to silence us.
	So we're going to talk to him about that, and as they talk about manipulating the historical narrative, an amazing story that I'm not going to have time to get to today, but they want to, the National Park System wants to remove William Penn from the park that was created in 1982.
	Only about 40 years ago.
	And it was a park that was centered around his house.
	So they go to William Penn's historical house.
	They named the area after the ship that brought William Penn over.
	And they're going to purge William Penn.
	Now you and I know that William Penn, the Quaker leader, never owned any slaves.
	So what was his crime?
	Well, his crime is that he was the founder of our civilization that they wished to destroy.
	You see, they're going to take him down for what purpose?
	To make it about Native Americans, they said.
	Well, I'm a Native American.
	I had an interview yesterday with a news network, the Unity News Network out of the UK. And he asked me, he said, so where are you from in Europe?
	I said, I have no idea where people came from.
	I'm a Native American.
	We've been here for so many centuries in my family that we don't identify with anything else.
	So don't talk to me about Native Americans.
	Let me say something about this.
	You know, it's great.
	You've got some tribes that had some forms of government and it inspired, you know, we learned things from the Native American Indians and they learned some things from us.
	But they did not create respect for the free exercise of religion.
	That was largely the work of people like William Penn.
	William Penn, who defied official state churches that tried to lock him down and defy his conscience, he defied that in the UK. And he was arrested for that.
	And the people who refused to convict him, the jury foreman and the other people, when they let him go, they were jailed by the judge.
	And then their lawyer said, what crime did they commit?
	Because they just nullified a bad law.
	There was no question that Penn had violated that law.
	So they said, what law did he violate?
	That helped to establish habeas corpus.
	And the judge says, well, there's no law saying the jurors can't nullify the law.
	And so that established jury nullification.
	And then William Penn came to the United States and he established Pennsylvania.
	And the city of brotherly love, Philadelphia.
	By removing William Penn, they are trying to remove the foundations of our society.
	It wasn't Indians who gave us jury nullification, freedom of speech, free exercise of religion, and other things like that.
	He needs to be, and we need to honor those foundational values.
	And that's what they seek to destroy.
	The statue of William Penn is not important.
	Except for the fact that it represents that.
	These people in the Biden administration understand that that's what William Penn represents.
	You need to understand that as well.
	And there's a Breitbart article, and it has the comment period as if they care.
	They may care if they get a sufficient volume.
	But if you want to write them and complain about that, you can find the article at Breitbart.
	They've got the email address, the snail mail address that you can send complaints about this purging of American culture and American values that are despised by this foreign federal government of ours.
	They're foreign to everything that is American.
	They want to destroy everything that is American, and they want to destroy the foundations of Western civilization, the rule of law, jury nullification, and all those things that are so important that have given us the kinds of freedoms that we have enjoyed.
	So as he said, as I talked about this and the great taking, he said, less than a month after speaking at a conference where I first introduced this, he said, a man contacted me who asked to meet me in Stockholm.
	He had been the chairman of a U.S. political party.
	He had a long career related to the defense establishment.
	He stayed at a hotel that was within short walking distance from my apartment in Stockholm, and so we had lunch together.
	He suggested a pint of ale.
	He asked me to explain the subject to which I had spoken at the conference, and I went through the evidence and the implications.
	The odd thing is, is that he asked me no questions about this.
	Instead, he fixed me in the eye, and he says, Does your family know that you are doing this?
	He said nothing else.
	And that was the end of the meeting.
	I paid the bill and I left.
	He said perhaps that was a courtesy call, a warning, right?
	These people know what is going on.
	And let me tell you, that's why I have no patience with this stuff.
	It is cowardice.
	It is hypocrisy that is behind what the media is selling you.
	In the aftermath of the global financial crisis that eventually became known, the tens of trillions in losses, he writes, and derivative positions were housed in the biggest banks, which were then bailed out by the newly created money.
	The prime brokers would have failed, but to prevent that, they were turned into banks.
	And so they also received direct injections of created money from the Fed.
	No one was prosecuted.
	On the contrary, the perpetrators were rewarded with enormous bonuses.
	It was almost as if it had all gone according to plan.
	See, that was the key thing.
	You would see so many times all these people would say, well, what about these bank bailouts?
	And the banks that got bailed out would say, we paid it all back.
	Yeah, they did. With 0% loans from the Fed.
	The Fed kept them in business and they passed the fiat currency back and forth to each other and call that payment.
	It was about keeping them in business and this is about keeping them in business as well.
	He said, Webb shows that given the cyclical collapse of economies and empires, again, the fourth turning thing, the general thing, they know that as well.
	That's why people don't like to talk about that.
	The cyclical collapse of economies and empires, the contemporary heirs of all of this control, knew that a similar collapse is going to recur.
	And they have been preparing for it.
	And they are determined to remain in control.
	He said his argument about the great taking is that the so-called elites have spent years to prepare for a super-cycle collapse.
	This fourth turning. Big one.
	Big one. That will necessitate the transition to a new world order.
	And they want to have that new world order with them still in control.
	They're going to be new leaders.
	going to be new orders from these same leaders.
	There are now no property rights to securities that are held in book entry form in any jurisdiction globally.
	In the grand scheme to confiscate all collateral, dematerialization of securities was the essential first step.
	The planning and the efforts began over half a century ago.
	Not only was the CIA intimately involved in this dematerialization, which essentially meant moving from paper-based stock certificate archiving to a computer-based system, but the CIA project leader was moved to a senior position in the banking sector without any banking experience.
	Webb raises the possibility, interrogatively, that the ensuing paperwork crisis was manufactured by To justify the dematerialization process which paved the way for the present electronic archiving system worldwide.
	Let me just try to explain that in a slightly different way.
	When you look at the mortgage crisis and all that stuff that happened in the mid-2000s, what was that based on?
	Dematerialization. You didn't have...
	People were not buying and selling securities.
	What they did was they put all this stuff into a big, you know, derivative...
	And you couldn't separate out any of these individual mortgages.
	They were all just put in and blended.
	They turned the blender on, if you will, right?
	It's like feeding all these pieces of paper into a paper shredder and then taking all those shredded things which you could no longer identify and selling them as a lot and say, well, you know, this is a package of mortgages that's worth X amount of dollars.
	They just completely destroyed it.
	And that was the essence of what that financial crisis was about.
	And now he says they've done that to everything.
	That's what David Webb is saying.
	Even if, for example, you're worried because you don't want to buy a car on an installment program because you're worried about this stuff.
	So even if you purchase a car and you pay cash for it, he said, security entitlements have been changed legally to permit creditors of the bankrupt car dealership to seize your car as an asset that still belongs to the dealership.
	Whenever somebody goes into bankruptcy, They can go back, and I've seen this happen to a construction company that was getting into financial trouble, and they had people that were going to build homes for people, and people gave them money.
	And to build a home, and it might have been six months.
	I forget what the time limit is, but it's a very long time.
	Six months, a year, something like that.
	These people had given them money, and they were maybe in the process of building or doing something with it, but they paid them this cash.
	And the bankruptcy court confiscated that cash from the people.
	That was their down payment for their home.
	And I said, well, you gave it to, you know, this construction company, and we're just going to take that.
	That type of thing is what he's talking about here.
	Essentially, all securities owned by the public and custodial accounts, all pension plans, investment funds, are now encumbered as collateral underpinnings to this derivative complex.
	Through additional legislation...
	This has been harmonized to ensure that secured creditors are guaranteed that their assets are protected through cross-border mobility of legal control.
	And again, you know, they're making these things.
	It's all about, when we liquidate this stuff, there's a hierarchy of people who get paid off.
	And that's what they have done.
	They have changed this, according to David Webb.
	He said, in 2005, less than two years before the onset of the global financial crisis, Safe harbor provisions in the U.S. Bankruptcy Code were significantly changed.
	This was about making it absolutely certain that secured creditors can take clients' assets and that this cannot be challenged subsequently.
	This was about a safe harbor for secured creditors against the demands of customers to own their assets.
	He said it gets worse. It turns out that if something called central clearing parties, who are tasked with providing clearing and settlement for trades in a variety of financial transactions, if that is insufficiently capitalized to prepare for the eventuality of failing, and such a failure occurs, it is the secured creditors who will take the assets of the entitlement holders.
	This is where it is going.
	It is designed to happen suddenly and on a vast scale.
	He elaborates about the Great Deflation.
	He says it's a reminder that this kind of thing has happened before in the 1930s, although not on the scale that they're planning to do this.
	And he writes, as a human being, should this not concern you?
	If you think that you're going to be able to escape out of it, which part of the organized slaughter of vast numbers of innocent people can you find acceptable?
	Do you believe that you are special in some way?
	That you were being protected or that you will be protected now?
	To not know is bad.
	To not want to know is even worse.
	And this is what I say to the people who excuse what Trump did in 2020.
	With the jabs.
	With creating the jabs.
	With the lockdowns.
	With the masks. With the social distancing.
	With all the rest of this stuff.
	Do you not want to know?
	What happened in front of your eyes?
	Do you not care, as a human being, how many people Trump killed and Biden?
	It's just amazing to me to see where this is.
	We're going to go to our guest here.
	Before we do, I just want to read some of the comments on Rockfin.
	Aldi, good to see you.
	MRR, Modern Retro Radio.
	The government has always trampled on natural rights.
	Yeah, that's right. On North American House, it posts that I'm sick and tired of being made to feel guilty for purported injustices that happened centuries before I was born.
	Yeah, and I don't even I don't think there were any injustices done by William Penn They just want to promote to us Another culture another society other than one that is formed to uphold our individual liberties Thank you.
	Nice to be able finally to watch you live today.
	Well, thank you so much.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk to someone that I interviewed a few years ago, Alex Lazarev.
	He is on the line now.
	We're going to take a quick break, and I'm going to play a little bit of a clip that he has on his website as an introduction to what he does.
	And in that clip, The reason I had interviewed him a few years ago was because he was doing a great job of pointing out the absurdity of people walking in lockstep behind the government.
	And he got so angry with him that the guy busted out the window of his car.
	You'll see that in this clip.
	So here's a clip from Alex Lazarev that we will be talking to in just a moment.
	I don't want to hate on them at all.
	all their victims of a system that is based on fear and separation.
	Isolate yourselves, wear your masks, social distance.
	Just trust the narrative you've never been lied to about anything.
	The government loves you.
	The only reason we're on a planet right now where the people who are running the show are basically destroying the planet, central banking, stealing everybody's money, destroying their resources, and that's not the point.
	The point is that we're on a planet where the people who are running the show are basically destroying the planet, central banking, stealing everybody's money, I mean, the only way that's comfortable is that if we, the people, are so steep in separation and fear and lack, trying to survive, trying to make a dollar, you know, spending for ourselves, competing with each other, it's only because we're in that state.
	Of separation from each other and from the divine, that this system can continue to function as it does.
	There's definitely not a psychological operation happening when you're convinced of a reality that's based on fear that has nothing to do with what's actually happening.
	Okay, are you happy now?
	This video, if anything, should show all of us that we need to come together.
	We cannot be falling for this man versus woman, black versus white, rich versus poor, blah, blah, blah.
	We are all human beings, for now, together here.
	So let's come together, let's love one another no matter what our differences.
	Even the people who are like, no, I don't want to wake up, just want to keep doing my shitty job and paying taxes.
	Even those people are going to be violently, if necessary, shaken into awakening.
	It's going to be like everyone's going to get shaken up real nice right now.
	As a Canadian, it's hard to admit that Americans are just better at some things than we are.
	Things such as falsifying election results, paying top dollar for medical care, as well as creating and destroying global terrorism.
	However, there is one thing Canadians are better at than just about everyone.
	Following orders without asking why.
	Okay, that's Alex Lazarev.
	Thank you for joining us, Alex.
	I love confronting all this stuff with humor.
	That is such a powerful weapon.
	You look at Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals.
	He said there's no more powerful weapon than ridicule because there's no response to it.
	And that's what you were doing when that guy smashed your window there.
	That's the last time we talked.
	So he smashed that window there.
	You were ridiculing the people who were following the orders, and he couldn't stand it.
	It really got onto him.
	Whatever came of that, were there any charges brought against him?
	No, that's a whole saga on its own.
	But long story short, the Crown decided it was not in the public interest to pursue charges.
	And then it gets better.
	We figured out why.
	People who work with this gentleman reached out to confirm his identity.
	It turns out this gentleman was a government doctor.
	He's actually head of BC Cancer.
	Oh, okay. So this guy's a doctor, right?
	So the... You know, the conspiracy theorists are out there trying to drop truth bombs, and the doctors, who are supposed to be healing people, are out there attacking people and smashing their windows.
	So, opposite land as usual.
	That's amazing. Well, you know, it's interesting because you're a working comedian, and I think that's comedians doing what you were doing, saying, believe the government, they love you, they will tell you the truth about it.
	They're only concerned about your health, that type of stuff.
	You have a real chance to really wake people up.
	And we've seen this with a lot of different comedians speaking truth about the political system to people.
	So tell us a little bit about what you do.
	Are you doing tours now, or what is it that you do?
	Yeah, I just did my first Cross Canada tour.
	It was a lot of fun.
	Again, my comedy's not for everybody, but the people who know what I'm about, you know, have been coming out.
	And they are, the Awake Canadians are the sweetest people on planet Earth.
	They're really lovely. And we laughed our asses off.
	It was magical. It really was.
	Yeah, it was great. It's really hard, too, because comedy in general is dying, because people don't want that kind of critique, and they don't want people holding a mirror up and showing the absurdity of that situation.
	And so the purging and the censorship has gotten really bad.
	I'm sure that, you know, just as we saw with the guy smashing your window, those same type of people want to do everything they can to shut you down.
	Tell us a little bit about that kind of opposition.
	Yeah, it's interesting you should ask that.
	I mean, when the show started, it was during the lockdown, so it was the most magical time.
	Everybody who's awake laughing at how crazy and brainwashed everyone out there is.
	And that's the concept of the show I've been doing, Buddha's Underground, was going in these secret locations and word of mouth letting people know that there's a show they should attend if they're like-minded.
	But something crazy happened.
	As I came into...
	I just wanted to see if we could do a bit of marketing and kind of get the show out there.
	And I put in a couple of ads on Instagram just to see if other people kind of tune in.
	And the wrong people saw the ad, apparently.
	And it's very risky, you know, making that move from word of mouth to like, let's put it out there a little bit and see if people get it.
	People did not get it.
	I had a show canceled on me in Cleveland because apparently I am anti-trans now, David.
	And you might think I'm anti-trans because I have controversial views.
	Like, if you're born with a vagina, you're a woman.
	But that's not it. The reason I'm anti-trans is because somebody messaged me and said, you're anti-trans, you're not We're good to go.
	It's because I attended the Million Man March for Freedom.
	Do you remember in Canada we had a really big event, right?
	You know about it. And I was there interviewing both sides just to get the information.
	And apparently my attendance there, because the Canadian government said we were anti-trans, to get the trans people out protesting us on that day, I had a show cancelled on me.
	So I didn't think it could happen to me, but it did.
	Well, you know, I talked to the current CEO of Promise Keepers.
	It was a prominent Christian organization back in the 90s.
	They had a celebrity guy that was running, I think he was a former coach or something.
	And they used to get massive rallies and stuff.
	But now he's got churches that are canceling him.
	Just because, like you said, you went to the Million Man March.
	Promise Keepers is for men.
	It's like, you know, say, this is what you need to do as a man.
	Well, we can't have that, right?
	And even in the Christian churches, many of them, they don't want to have that there.
	It truly is amazing. When you look at it, you know, how Orwellian can we get?
	This is something that is so absurd that even George Orwell didn't talk about it, right?
	It's not just 2 plus 2 equals 5.
	It's to say, make up all this stuff about pronouns.
	If you don't use the right pronoun, you're out of there, right?
	I just heard a story from my friend here.
	His friend works basically in a Basically, the bottom line of the story was some 8-month-old child had some kind of injury and had to go to the hospital, and they spent more time arguing over what the pronouns would be for the 8-month-old baby than actually treating the injury.
	And this is for real. I just heard this yesterday, and this is in Canada.
	And I was just like, oh, God.
	Yeah, it's getting...
	Wow. Well, you know, again, when we look at all the rest of the stuff, their priorities are just...
	Not even about health at all.
	Handy, who is an EMS technician, was talking about how people would come in in the middle of all this stuff and, you know, they're having a heart attack and the first thing they would do is, well, let's take them in and run a PCR test.
	And, of course, that was all about the money because they get a bonus if it's a PCR test, you know?
	So they don't, the health is not the number one thing we've got to first see if we can get some cash with a PCR test.
	We've got to work out what their pronouns are.
	And then if he's still alive, we'll do something about it.
	You know, it's just, it's amazing what the priorities have become.
	David, I like to contemplate this sometimes.
	Have you ever contemplated what it would be like on our planet if the governments actually cared about our health?
	Have you really just thought about that for a second?
	Can you imagine? What would it be like being pulled over by the police?
	You know, they pull you over, they'll be like, excuse me, sir, are you eating McDonald's?
	No, no, no, put that there. Come on. Jimmy, get out the organic salad bar.
	Get it out. Sir, you look a little bit stressed out.
	Have you tried meditation? Let me ask, let me, here, please, get out of the car, please.
	Take your shoes off, sir. We're going to ask you to stand next to this tree, and I want you to breathe with the tree.
	I want you to ground with the tree, okay?
	And we're going to do it in downward dog.
	Are you ready? It would be a completely different experience, you know?
	Well, I think we may be getting pretty close to that.
	If they think that's it, you know what I'm saying?
	Of course, I don't think they really thought that the jabs were making people healthy.
	Some of the people did, you know, and so they were adamant that they were going to pull you over and put the mask on you and do the rest of the stuff.
	You know, there really were people, a lot of sheep who believe that narrative, and maybe they thought they were doing the work of God or something by doing that to people.
	But it's that kind of paternalism, that kind of nannyism.
	Again, health is something, if they're going to mass medicate people or they're going to put you as just one part of the herd, and you've got to sacrifice yourself for the good of the herd.
	We're not talking about health anymore.
	Now this is all about politics.
	When we look at it, it's such a dark time.
	What do we do to get out of this?
	Well, I tell you what I think about that.
	P.S., on your last comment, it's 2024.
	Anybody that's still wearing a mask, I think we should mandate that they need to trade their mask in for a helmet.
	Because a lot of those people are falling off.
	Okay, it's too dark. Forget that joke.
	Look, what do we do?
	I think the only thing we ever can do, which is live our truth, You know what I mean?
	Just live our truth fearlessly and know that the being that is running the show is the creator.
	And the creator can't lose.
	We cannot lose.
	But we have to be in integrity and do what's right.
	And if people were doing what's right fearlessly from the beginning, this would have ended on, you know...
	Day six or something, you know, week one, it would have been like, no, nobody's cooperative.
	Look what's happening in Germany right now when you get hundreds of thousands, you know, huge numbers of farmers coming out.
	So knowing what you know is right in your heart, no matter what craziness they're telling you that you know is wrong and acting in integrity, that's how we end this nightmare and fast.
	Yeah, that's right. Yeah.
	Yeah, I guess when we look at it, you know, it is a really dark time.
	We understand what their agenda is.
	They have really gone public with it, which is kind of an act of desperation, as many people pointed out, because they've got to do it quickly.
	And so these Judas goats says, what you do, do quickly.
	And that's what they're working on here.
	But you know, you talk about people 2024 trading in their mask.
	I think at this point, maybe a helmet might be one thing, maybe a white cane and a hearing aid, because they must be blind and deaf to the world and not be able to see what is going on for the last several years.
	It truly is amazing, but I do occasionally, even here, I rarely see people in a mask, but occasionally I do see somebody in a mask, even here.
	It's crazy. But I realize, though, that Because people are so deep in the matrix and they're so, so asleep on every level, not just what's happening in the world, but spiritually asleep, right?
	We've been so disconnected from our true nature as infinite consciousness, as the love that we are, the love that all great enlightened masters have spoken about and pointed to.
	And it's that level of disconnection that makes this level of sleep possible.
	So, for me, the Great Awakening is not just...
	There's actually two great things happening.
	It's not just people are realizing the government, all the scams, the central banking scam, all this kind of stuff.
	There's also the spiritual awakening happening.
	The spiritual awakening much, much deeper than that.
	And the biggest lie that people are also getting is that we're not these smart monkeys.
	We are... We're infinitely powerful beings.
	We are the universe in human bodies.
	As the famous quote, we're spiritual beings having a human experience rather than human beings having a spiritual experience.
	We are spirit.
	That's the big fear.
	Death. That's how they control it.
	Oh, you're going to die. Do what we tell you if you're going to die.
	But people are realizing we're immortal.
	We cannot die. We're consciousness.
	That's the spiritual awakening that's hitting the planet, and I'm hoping that we're going to have a global awakening to that, because when we realize we're all one consciousness, you're not going to go shoot another version of yourself because the government told you.
	You know what I'm saying? So this is what we're coming into, that we're one people, one race, one love, and that, I believe, will be the end of all of this insanity.
	Well, you know, in your video, you point out that, you know, the key thing, and it begins with this isolation that they're trying to force everybody into.
	And I think that's the most dehumanizing of all this stuff.
	I mean, everything they do is about dehumanizing us, but that is at the foundation of it.
	And that was what was so strange about this lockdown stuff.
	Even though I knew that they'd been practicing this since two months before 9-11 with Dark Winter, and they'd done it annually on a regular basis, it was just so strange to see people going along with this.
	People saying, okay, we'll isolate ourselves from all other human beings, and even in our homes, with our families, some of them put on masks, and no, I don't want any relatives coming over for the holidays or anything like that.
	It was just this...
	You know, people imprisoning themselves.
	And the self-incarceration, the self-suppression, and that really is, you know, as Robert Malone was talking about how they kill people in the rest homes, you know, there was a lot of things that they physically did to them, but just the isolation will kill somebody.
	And that's one of the key things I think we really have to fight back against, don't we?
	Mm-hmm. This is part of their main, main agenda.
	I had a moment of, you know how you have those moments of clarity at times?
	Something just hits you and you go, wow!
	I had one of those early on.
	It was maybe a few months into the lockdowns in Canada.
	And of course, I'm doing my secret underground shows.
	And before one of the shows, everybody's in the kitchen at this house where everybody's eating food and talking.
	We People were so excited just to be in a room talking to each other and people were having so much fun connecting and eating food together.
	I couldn't even get them into the basement to do the comedy show.
	It was a struggle. And in that moment, just standing there in the kitchen watching everybody just in the love vibration eating food and connecting, I realized that in itself was the human experience.
	People meeting each other and connecting and eating and just having fun together.
	That is the human experience that they're trying to destroy.
	They don't want us just loving each other and being together.
	And in that moment, it was clear.
	And I really saw it for what it was then.
	That's interesting. I think of it...
	As you're talking about this and you've got your underground parties and all this, I'm imagining a speakeasy type of thing.
	Because it really is about prohibition.
	They're trying to prohibit everything.
	They're trying to prohibit socializing with people.
	And you can go into a situation like this and you can breathe easy, you can speak easy, because people aren't deranged with this prohibition of everything.
	It really is you go back and look at old prohibition and it's the contrast of being able to speak easily About what's on your mind being able to breathe easily being able to socialize with other people versus prohibition You know that's even more important than the alcohol aspect of it. I think Yeah, they're prohibiting love They're prohibiting the human experience, really.
	Yeah. That's where we are right now.
	I think that's prohibited with the Constitution, quite frankly.
	I haven't seen the Constitutional Amendment to allow that kind of prohibition.
	I've said that many times.
	You know, they had to pass a Constitutional Amendment to prohibit alcohol, but now they just prohibit everything they want, including our own socialization now when you talk about it.
	Speakeasy. That's interesting.
	So that was where you were operating during this kind of lockdown stuff.
	in Canada, it's interesting, too, in Canada that across so many nations, most of churches would shut down and isolate.
	And that was very atypical of the history of the church.
	And Canada, and Western Canada, and Alberta, after several months of this, some of the pastors said, okay, you know, this isn't a threat to anybody.
	We're going to open up again.
	And then they became the center of persecution.
	And so I think, you know, when you look at that, that had the power, and I said that I remember having John Rapoport on, and we talked about, you know, it was just two weeks into it, you know, it began in the middle of March, and we were coming up to Easter, and John was saying, you know, to stop this, you need to have all the churches meet for Easter, you know, as they typically do.
	And if they do that, everybody would say, see, they didn't die.
	You know, they had to have that courage, but most didn't have that courage.
	And then finally, when a few of them took the initiative, they became the point of oppression that happened in Canada.
	What part of Canada are you in?
	Are you in Alberta?
	I was in Vancouver, British Columbia.
	And to your point...
	It really goes to show you that there's no genuine spiritual connection at all in most religions, because if you're actually connected to a higher power of some kind, whatever it is that you know that you understand we're divine beings and we're part of creation...
	To know that, to know that that is what you are, you would never cooperate with this dark agenda.
	Never! Absolutely not!
	You would never go along with inject yourself with a foreign substance because the government told you to do it.
	It's absolutely insane.
	So it's really shown us just how fake most pastors, most priests, most religions are.
	There's no love there. There's no connection to source energy.
	It's all a scam.
	And I'm actually glad it's been exposed.
	I'm happy it's been exposed.
	Yeah. You know, just like all these celebrities, you know, who kept their mouths shut.
	Yeah, a lot of these churches were really taking a nosedive in it, and that's why we were talking about that.
	We said, you know, hey, this ought to be the place where they lead, because they're not afraid of death, right?
	And I talked about that in my childhood.
	I was diagnosed, it was a false diagnosis.
	Typically do in hospitals.
	They thought that I had meningitis, very contagious and everything.
	I actually had tomain poisoning.
	But the pastor, they wouldn't even let my parents in, but the pastor came in and talked to me.
	And that really lasted.
	You know, that was a sincerity that I saw there.
	And you didn't see that in a lot of different places in this lockdown, did you?
	It truly is amazing how people back down.
	And past in the history, you would always have, during any kind of plague, you know, this never happened before.
	They wouldn't just shut down and hide.
	They would be the ones who are out there administering first aid to people and taking the chances with their life.
	But just the opposite happened now.
	People become lovers of themselves, haven't they?
	It truly is amazing. Yeah, and that's why they have to make it such a strong example of anybody that speeds up, because they know the power was with us, and if people actually had a little bit of courage, they have no chance.
	So the three or four or ten or twenty people that rise up, oh, you've got to crush them, you know?
	And they have no chance against us.
	They know that. So what is the climate like now?
	I know you just got purged for other reasons.
	They've got a long list of things that they will purge us for, and it's got to be really difficult being a comedian, just like it's got to be really difficult being a comedian.
	Doing what I do as well, because whatever we talk about, we get perched.
	I'm not trying to avoid any topics, and I know you're not trying to avoid them either.
	So what is it like for you in Canada right now?
	I mean, I've just gone across the country for the first time.
	I had a really, really great time.
	You know, as long as I'm in a room with people who get me, like, I have one of my jokes, you know, I talk about this on stage, one of my friends says to me, he says, oh, you're talking about everything, all the conspiracies and all the true stuff and spirituality, and how do you, you know, do people come to your shows?
	I mean, you talk about all this stuff you can never say on TV, you can't get on Netflix, none of this stuff, what do you do?
	And I said to him, look, there's only really two types of people when it comes to my comedy.
	There's the people that really appreciate and get my comedy, and they think I'm hilarious.
	And the other type... Well, they're not going to be around that long anyway, so ultimately, you know, my market is growing, you know?
	Okay, that's a little bit dark.
	But the joy of life, really, and this is the joy of life and the joy of being happy in general, to do authentically what makes you happy, what fills your heart with joy.
	So me being in a room of people, they get me, where I could really truly be myself, that is the greatest gift, and I absolutely love it.
	And if that means I have a smaller audience, that's fine.
	But I honestly think...
	It's growing. More and more people are coming.
	Actually, so many people are waking up.
	That's really what I picked up on this tour.
	Just one random story.
	I was in a public library somewhere in Way in eastern Canada, in the middle of nowhere, and I overheard a conversation by two women who work at the library, and their conversation was something along the lines of, like, yeah, one of them was saying, yeah, I didn't get the vax, because, you know, it's not 100% safe, I'm not sure, and the other one said, yeah, I got it, but basically their conversation was saying, yeah, it's not 100% safe, we're not really sure about this whole thing, and then both of them looked at each other at the same moment and said, but we're not anti-vaxxers, though, because God forbid anyone think that.
	And I spoke to the librarian afterwards and she said to me, look, I'll be honest with you, my friends who all didn't get the shot are fine, but I got it and I've had long COVID for two years and I'm starting to wonder.
	And it was one of those moments where I'm tuning in like, okay, how direct does the universe want me to be?
	I don't want to freak this lady out.
	And I felt like she was ready and I just looked at her and I said, sister, it's designed to destroy your immune system and it always was the case and you need to detox that.
	I said, do you want me to send you all the information?
	She said, please do. So librarians, we're talking like women in their 50s, librarians in Canada, they're getting it.
	They already know. So we're in a new place now in the awakening.
	A lot of people are getting it.
	That's good. That's good.
	Yeah, you know, it's, and I think once people come out of this and realize that they've been deceived, they're in a real position of power.
	I was just talking to Catherine Austin Fitz on Friday, and she said when they went back and looked at 2023, their big takeaway from it was that it was a year of pushback.
	And I've seen several people say that.
	People are waking up to this, and again, there's so many things to try to heal.
	It's the psychological damage that they've done to people as well as the physical damage that they've done to people.
	But you're there really to help them.
	You can give them some information about the physical damage, but also...
	Especially, I think, about the psychological damage.
	To laugh it off is a very important, powerful thing to understand what has happened.
	Make sure you're not going to have that happen before.
	And then to be able to look at it and see the hypocrisy or the irony of what has happened, I think.
	Yeah, it's weird.
	Many, many years ago, I started teaching this little workshop called Comedy Therapy and Authentic Communication, way before the pandemic or any of that stuff.
	And all the course was, it's just getting people to connect authentically, open up their hearts, but then see the humor in their trauma and be able to make jokes about it and laugh about it.
	So during the workshop, everybody just laughs at their own story.
	My mom wouldn't buy me toys and she'd throw shoes at my head.
	And I was like Neo in the Matrix, dodging my mom's shoes, you know.
	And people are laughing, but when you joke about your trauma and your messed up stuff, it releases the energy, right?
	It releases that energy. So humor is actually a really powerful healing tool, and they really don't want us laughing, especially at them.
	Especially at them. And actually, in the Soviet Union, the dictators historically have been brought down by comedians because the comedians were the only ones that could get away with saying anything.
	And the people would see that the emperor has no clothes and the empires would go down.
	So it's an important role.
	And I'm happy there's more and more comedians that are finally starting to speak out and make fun of all this.
	There weren't any in the beginning.
	It was shocking. Yeah, he talked about Russian comedians.
	I just recently saw something from Yakov Smirnoff, and I'll try to, you know, came to America, and he said, I'll try to paraphrase the joke, but he said, in the Soviet Union, he goes, we've got two channels.
	There's one of them that's just 24-7, 365 propaganda.
	And if you go to the other channel, there's somebody wagging their finger at you saying, go back to the other channel.
	That's funny. That's a funny joke.
	You know, that's really what we're becoming here.
	You know, there's one narrative.
	You better go back to that narrative.
	Don't stray away from the official story about whatever the plan of the day is.
	That's what we've seen now in social media and so many other places.
	Yeah, it is interesting.
	I think that it's very important, very powerful what comedians can do with this.
	So, great talking to you, Alexander.
	And your website, is it iProject.love?
	Is that the one that you... I've got two for my...
	For my comedy stuff, all the links are there.
	It's alexthecomic.com.
	So if people resonate and they want to check me out, if you're on Instagram, Telegram, anything, it's alexthecomic.
	And then my other side project with some beings where we're spreading love, oneness, spiritual teachings is iproject.love, where we're trying to build a community of people that want to build the new earth together.
	The paradise we all deserve to live on, coming from a place of love, we're working on that.
	Okay, good. And so the comedian stuff and your tour and where people can find you, because now we can come out of the darkness post-Tenebrous Lux, as they said in the Reformation, after darkness and the Middle Ages.
	Hopefully this is just a phase that we begin going through and it's all going to go away.
	But it's going to require us to all speak out and to come out of hiding places and to come out of the dark and to start spreading the truth and the light about what's really going on, I think.
	Shine the light on us. But it's happening, and all my best friends are because of this movement.
	It's activated and inspired so many people to stand up and speak out.
	And so we've got all these mini-celebrities and huge celebrities because of the pandemic that are waking up millions and millions of people.
	So I really believe that it's unfolded exactly the way.
	Even this coming weekend, I'm flying to Mexico for the Greater Reset Conference.
	It's hundreds of people all teaching you how to grow food, how to Google your phone, how to build community, how to be sovereign away from the government.
	Hundreds of people are descending.
	And all over the world, there's these kind of events.
	So it's really brought us all together.
	I believe that because people were so asleep and spiritually asleep, we needed this to happen for the Great Awakening.
	So I really feel like everything is unfolding perfectly, and it's going to be rough, but boy, we're going to win this thing, and it's going to be glorious.
	Yeah, I'm older than you all my life.
	I've seen this trend of people kind of self-isolating, you know, sitting in front of the television set all the time, or, you know, families eating TV dinners in front of the TV set.
	And it's just gotten worse all the time with the internet and all the rest of the stuff.
	So we have followed down this path of passivity and isolation from other people.
	And the only way that we're going to turn this around, the only way that we're going to be able to survive is if we develop real-world skills and learn how to build things and grow things and all the rest of the stuff.
	And that's going to require us to also work with other people in a community.
	So we're either going to, as they said in the American Revolution, join or die, you know?
	We're either going to join together with other people in a community and share our skills and complimentary skills and learn how to do things that we're all forgetting how to do.
	You know, we've become so passive, so digitized, and we're right on the cusp of them putting us into a digital prison.
	And so the way to fight that is with reality, with a community, with other people, and not with this digital stuff.
	And if we don't do that, It really is going to be the end.
	But that is the hope, and we may be able to do that.
	So I appreciate you speaking to people, speaking the truth and humor.
	AlexTheComic.com, and that's where you'll be able to find Alexander Lazarev.
	Thank you so much for joining us, Alex.
	Thank you, sir. Great to see you.
	All right. And we're going to take a quick break, folks, and we will be right back.
	Whether you're feeling like the blues...
	APS Radio has you covered.
	Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APS radio.com Music playing in the background.
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	Music playing in the background.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Alright, welcome back. As we're talking about the year of pushback, let's talk a little bit about what is happening in Germany.
	We've got a lot of farmers who are revolting, and as they say, the Green New Deal and the climate agenda is revolting, so why aren't you?
	Well, these people are. Now it was the Greens who were blocking traffic and sealing off roads, and now it's the farmers protesting the Greens who are blocking the roads.
	Brought everything to a standstill.
	With Dutch-style tractor protests throughout the country yesterday in response to the green globalism that is being pushed by the leftist coalition government.
	They want to increase taxes on diesel fuel.
	They want to eliminate the car tax exemption for farmers and many other things, including deep cuts on the subsidies that the farmers have become dependent upon.
	And that's one of the key things.
	When we look at how these bribes from government...
	Can addict you, can make you dependent on them.
	That is one of the concerns as we look at everything that the government does.
	That is one of the soft ways that they bring us into slavery, and that is by giving us money.
	I've talked about that so many times.
	government will come in, give you lots of money that they just printed up and then associated with that are some strings for things that you should do.
	The nationwide protest on Monday has seen tractors shut down entrances to motorways, bridges and tunnels in various states across Germany.
	In Berlin, people reported that at least 566 tractors as well as cars, trucks and vans descended on the city center, blocking the street of June the 17th between the Victory Column and the Brandenburg Gate, where they had a candlelight vigil.
	Production was also halted at a Volkswagen factory on Monday.
	You know, it's kind of interesting when they start having these candlelight vigils.
	That was one of the ways that they brought down the Berlin Wall.
	And so here they are doing that in Berlin as well.
	Will we be able to bring down the constructs that they're using to build a wallless prison?
	The Green Party vice chancellor, who was personally protested against by hundreds of farmers last week, has criticized the farmer protest.
	A government spokesperson warned on Friday that supposed far-right elements would seek to use the demonstration for their own benefit.
	But the farmers have had a broad base of support.
	Quite frankly, you don't have farms, you don't have food.
	It's just that simple. But as I look at this, there's an article on Reason, We're good to go.
	To tell farmers that they couldn't fix their machine.
	I mean, you couldn't even buy the official part and install it yourself.
	It had to be done at a dealer.
	And so, you've now got hackers that are out there helping the tractor owners jailbreak their equipment.
	And of course, that was something that has been developed over the last decade.
	And so, the government...
	Has come up with some very severe penalties for people doing that.
	It truly is amazing.
	A violation of the Federal Copyright Act, if they accuse you of that, they can send you to five years in federal prison and up to a $500,000 fine.
	And that would be the case if you fixed your John Deere tractor.
	And then if you're one of these hackers who's helping people to do that, they say the penalties double for each subsequent infraction.
	That means if you're a software developer who's building tools to help people get around John Deere's software blocks, you could get a 10-year prison sentence and a million-dollar fine for each time you distributed your tool.
	This is the insanity.
	This is our federal government.
	So when we look at what is happening in Holland, You know, where they're outlawing fertilizer.
	You've got people trying to smuggle in fertilizer.
	Pretty hard to do, by the way, because of the odor, I guess.
	And so when that hits the fan, and you've got tractor protests in Germany because they're trying to bankrupt these people with fines and taxes and then removing subsidies that people have gotten dependent upon.
	Just take a look at what is happening here in the U.S., And again, this is about, you know, when I look at all this stuff, and for the last 10 years, I mean, I just can't look at a John Deere hat and not think about this Digital Millennium Copyright Act and the way they are abusing this.
	As Reason says, as with smartphones or laptop repairs, farmers and the right to repair advocates have long complained that their agricultural equipment manufacturers have used software to lock the owners out of the products that they've purchased.
	So to combat these restrictions, farmers and white-hat hackers have joined in an unlikely alliance to liberate the tractors, they say.
	And so... John Deere has vertically integrated the entire ecosystem for equipment, requiring customers to purchase repair services exclusively from dealers and using software to prevent independent repairs.
	And again, this is nothing new.
	Eric Peters and I talked about this a decade ago.
	Whenever software has been used to prevent the owners of products from altering or repairing their property, groups of ideologically driven individuals have used their skills to circumvent such constraints.
	Agricultural equipment is no different.
	Hackers have taken it upon themselves to jailbreak the closed system software.
	One hacker said, quote, we want farmers to be able to repair their stuff for when things go wrong.
	And now that means being able to repair and make decisions about the software and their tractors.
	We've gone a long way, haven't we?
	You know, we had Paul Harvey who talked about, and then God created a farmer.
	He talked about all the different roles that a farmer has to do, the hard work and the different things he has to do and how long he has to work.
	Now, we shut them down.
	Again, what is the method of doing it?
	The digital world.
	These guys, what they need to do is they need to get rid of these new tractors and the electronic controls that come with them and all the bells and whistles that are convenient.
	Because... I don't know if it applies to all these different ones, but they do have tractors and devices that are using GPS that helps them to assist them so they don't have to pay as much attention, I guess, or they're not fully autopilot or whatever.
	But whatever these bells and whistles are, they'd be better off learning the skills to fix their own equipment as farmers always have in the past and being able to do it with an old tractor that is analog.
	And that's, I think, ultimately where this is going to have to go.
	Because the government is going to be on the side of big corporations.
	They're the ones who kicked this all off with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
	And so there has been a little bit of talk by a couple of members of Congress.
	That's what Reason wanted to talk about in terms of rolling this back.
	Reason says the Copyright Office has the ability to do this.
	But they have become another example of regulatory capture, just like the FDA, you know, Pfizer and the vaccines and all the rest of that stuff.
	So you've had a couple of representatives, one of them a Democrat, one of them a Republican.
	The Democrat in 2022, Mondaire Jones from New York, sponsored the Freedom to Repair Act.
	Which would exempt all maintenance and repairs from this Section 1201 that they're using to hit people with million-dollar fines and 10-year jail sentences, that type of thing.
	Representative Victoria Sparks, a Republican out of Indiana, introduced the Farm Freedom to Repair Act, a much narrower proposal that would permanently exempt the, quote, From falling into these massive fines and jail sentences.
	Either proposal would be an improvement over the status quo, but the Freedom to Repair Act is more comprehensive and presents a better solution to this.
	As Reason says, the ways in which John Deere and other corporations have used the Copyright Act is a glaring example of regulatory capture in action and working for the corporations rather than for the people that they were supposed to represent.
	If you look at, and again, what is behind all this, it truly is an effort to destroy our society and make everything digitized, to make it all dematerialized in a sense, as David Webb was talking about in The Great Taking.
	That is all a part of this.
	We have a Mexican-American billionaire in Tennessee.
	He's from New York.
	So this is a guy who's born in Mexico, becomes a New York citizen.
	He lives in New York.
	He's a billionaire. But what is he doing?
	He's created an organization to push gun control in Tennessee.
	And they call him the Tennessee 11, the foundation created by Mexican-American social entrepreneurs, how he describes himself.
	Billionaire Daniel Lubetzky funding a group called the Tennessee Eleven, which seeks to pass red flag gun laws and other gun control legislation this year in Tennessee.
	Well, good luck with that.
	It isn't going to happen. You know, we've seen, perhaps he had some influence with Governor Lee, who tried to push through the red flag, but that already got shut down.
	We've got a lot of good, patriotic people in the legislature here in Tennessee.
	So unless that changes with this next election...
	He's not going to get this thing through, no matter how much money he spends.
	The special session, the legislative session this year begins today in Tennessee.
	He made a lot of money from a snack company that he sold to Mars in 2020.
	He made $5 billion selling a snack company to Mars.
	And while the company was under his management, Barack Obama and his administration made him a presidential ambassador of global entrepreneurship.
	He's a globalist. And the person who helped to put him on that path and gave him that title was then Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker.
	Penny Pritzker has been at the center of what is going on in Harvard.
	And of course, the Pritzker family name just keeps coming up more and more frequently, doesn't it?
	You've got Governor Pritzker in Illinois.
	You had one of the...
	I think the guy who's actually still running the Hyatt Hotels was mentioned in these Epstein things.
	And of course, the cousin of Governor Pritzker of Illinois...
	His cousin is a doppelganger for him but now says that he's a woman.
	And the family, the Pritzker family, has been a key funder of transgenderism and a lot of other sexual perversity, pretending that it's an academic enlightenment.
	And so they have been funding this type of stuff for a very long time.
	And so now here's this guy who was celebrated, promoted, given an honorary title by Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker.
	And now this New Yorker, this Mexican-American, this billionaire, is now going to try to push gun control in Tennessee.
	Maybe you ought to pick an easier target, right?
	Tennessee 11 apparently met for the first time in September when the group held a solution session in Franklin, Tennessee.
	Amongst their proposals, again, the red flag law that maybe they've already had some influence with Governor Lee.
	They've got eight different proposals for new gun laws.
	They want to create an incentives first approach to gun ownership and rights and responsibilities.
	What do you think they mean by that?
	Well, again, if it's an incentive, if it's a privilege, it's not a right.
	Rights come from God.
	Privileges are granted by government.
	And we already know what our Constitution says.
	The proposed laws or regulations require Tennesseans to obtain a license or a permit to carry a handgun.
	That has also been determined.
	That's just recently.
	The legislature here in Tennessee made constitutional carry of the law.
	So these people are trying to push back against that.
	Just as a warning, we began by talking about the The danger to the German farmers, economic danger to them, as these subsidies that they've come to depend upon are being pulled away from them.
	And keep that in mind.
	This was an article from Live Action News.
	And this is 16 states that are planning millions of dollars in support for pregnancy help centers.
	Now, first you might say, that's a good thing.
	But I tend to look at any government funding from the government as a Trojan horse.
	To entrap you with dependency and then to come back and to punish you with that.
	And that's what I'm very concerned about with this.
	I've always said that going back to when our kids were young.
	We had a lot of homeschoolers who were pushing in North Carolina saying, we've got to get government subsidy and we've got to get them to let our kids play in sports or do music groups or something like that.
	It's like, no, you don't want to become dependent upon them.
	Because they will use that to control you.
	And I'm very concerned that even as you've got a lot of the Democrat states that are criminalizing these pregnancy help centers, who are doing nothing when you have these radical abortionists burn them down or attack them otherwise, they stand off to the side.
	They do everything to protect an abortion center with their FACE Act.
	If you even get close to them, they will come after you with a SWAT team rate, as we have seen.
	But I think that government works best when it works least.
	And I think that people need to understand that if it is something that is important, they need to take the initiative to do that.
	So I think it really is a trap.
	And I would warn people against anything like that because what will happen is once they become dependent on that, you get some different politicians in, they'll be able to shut down these pregnancy centers who are then not being financed by like-minded people voluntarily, but they're being financed by a government program that can easily be terminated.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, I want to say a few things before the program runs out, a few things about what is going on with the war that they want to take us into.
	As people are starting to push back and wake up, they want to take us into war, and they're working pretty hard to do that.
	We'll be right back. Elvis.
	Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles.
	And the sweet sounds of Motown.
	Find them on the oldies channel at APS radio.com Using free speech to free minds Oh, okay.
	you It's the David Knight Show.
	Well, there's an article from Brian Shalhavi at Health Impact News.
	Why hasn't the U.S. secured the Red Sea shipping routes?
	That's a good question, isn't it?
	We have this really powerful aircraft carrier group, and of course they brought one of them home.
	But, you know, that should be a piece of cake for For them in this asymmetric warfare, I would think.
	You know, the other side's got these, you know, the big problem is that they're using, you know, the missiles to take out these drone boats or these pirates or whatever, costing, you know, 10 times or 100 times what those assets are worth.
	But, of course, we can just print money out of thin air.
	So why is this happening?
	It is kind of interesting, as Brian points out, that U.S. oil exports have increased...
	By 1.4 million barrels a day since the Hooties started attacking ships.
	That's something very similar to what we saw with the pipeline.
	Do you remember that? You know, you had the two pipelines that were coming in.
	The Nord Stream 1 and the Nord Stream 2.
	The Nord Stream 1 had been in operation for a while.
	And then, you know, the second one was about to open up.
	And the U.S. is putting a lot of pressure on Germany not to turn the tap on there because, again, they were not going to be our customers.
	They were going to be buying stuff from Germany.
	And I think it's always interesting to look at this.
	As Gerald Salanti had pointed out, he says, why is there so much war in the Middle East?
	Why are they fighting over Syria?
	Well, it isn't because they want the sand.
	You know, there's the oil that is there.
	And if you look at the war in Syria, that was also over a pipeline.
	The U.S. had a pipeline that was set up from other allies that they wanted to run across in a different route than the one that the Russians were doing in Syria.
	And then when we look at what is happening in Europe, we've had a lot of European commentators and politicians saying, this is them blowing up the pipeline, the Americans blowing up the pipeline.
	It was really about making Europe dependent on the liquid natural gas that the U.S. is selling, and that went way up as well.
	And now we're starting to see the same things here.
	We're seeing this Red Sea, but we don't seem to be able to control that.
	But we certainly can increase the oil that we're selling out of the United States, and we're seeing record amounts of oil.
	And people will say, and this is kind of interesting how people get set in their ways.
	I remember at the beginning of the Trump administration when he was talking about putting in Rex Tillerson.
	And I said, well, Rex Tillerson is a globalist greenie.
	You know, he is somebody who's really 100% on board with the climate stuff.
	And not only that, but, you know, he pushed the, you know, bringing in adult leaders who are homosexual in the Boy Scouts.
	And I understand anybody of any kind.
	Sexual preference can go in and abuse kids.
	But what you do is you try, you would segregate these guys because you would say, well, the chances of that happening statistically are less than if you put men over little tiny girls or something like that.
	And so you had those types of segregation.
	He moved that away because, again, he was pushing that environmental and social governance.
	Rex Tillerson was an ESG guy.
	You had a social agenda.
	You had a climate agenda that he was pushing.
	And when I would talk about that, people would say, you're crazy.
	He was head of Exxon.
	It's like, I don't care.
	Exxon is pushing that.
	Exxon has invested heavily in these new energy technologies to be in on the ground floor.
	And yes, they've got a lot of oil to sell, but they would be very happy to treat the oil in the same way that De Beers and some of these diamond companies do.
	So people will look at this and say, but Biden wants to shut down fossil fuels.
	It's like, well, that may be his long-term goal, but I think he certainly is making a lot of money out of this right now for his business partners, and to the extent that he's gotten a lot of the people in his party angry at him about that.
	And so maybe they really don't want to protect the traffic there.
	Maybe they don't want Germany to be getting their fuel and their gas and everything from Russia.
	Maybe they want them to buy it from us at a higher price or whatever.
	You know, we look at all of this and we say, well, Biden, I know that Biden is a Democrat, and I know that Biden wants to get us all on the electric grid and shut down all this other stuff and make us all buy electric cars.
	Yeah, that's all true.
	But for right now, he might be taking a powder on all of this.
	In the same sense that just because Trump says he's an anti-globalist, you take a look at what they do, right?
	If Biden is supporting the oil industry and all this, that may be what is really behind that.
	Meanwhile, you've got Mike Johnson, as we talked about at the beginning of the program, the $1.6 trillion.
	He's now saying, in an interview on Sunday with CBS, he said, we have to know, what is the endgame in Ukraine?
	What is our strategy there?
	What is the objective? He said, what we're saying is, you know, we have reached a $34 trillion cumulative debt.
	And he said, so what we're saying is, we've got to do this in a rational manner.
	We need to have some accountability here for the people who are funding that.
	And the White House hasn't been forthcoming with those answers.
	Now, think about this.
	He says, we've got a $34 trillion deficit.
	And we need to go about this in a rational manner.
	What is rational about having a $34 trillion deficit?
	What is rational about giving another penny to these criminals in Ukraine?
	Again, he is speaking out of both sides of his mouth when he talks about this.
	And so, you've got a lot of people who understand that...
	Even in the Biden administration, they're saying, well, we're slowly walking into a much, much broader war in the Middle East.
	And even some of the people in the Biden administration are speaking out against that and don't want to see that happening.
	And yet, we're seeing, we just had the Iraqi government Say that we want to get the Americans out of Iraq, finally and fully.
	Want to get you out because you just launched a missile strike against one of your enemies here in Baghdad.
	And the U.S. government said, well, we did that because they attacked us in Syria.
	And again, the question is, why are we in Syria?
	We're not there legally. We're there to take the oil.
	Every time we've got a situation like this where Americans are hit, they say, well, we've got to retaliate for that because we're there illegally.
	And it's not just in Lebanon, as you see the Israelis making the attack in Lebanon, as the Americans are making the attack in Baghdad.
	The ultimate goal is to get us into a war with Iran.
	And think about that. You know, going back to, it was in the Clinton administration where they took over the embassy.
	That's where most people's awareness of Iran begins.
	But they'd long been our ally with the Shah of Iran.
	And it was Reagan who set up a secret alliance with Iran.
	See, none of this stuff is as it appears on the surface.
	You know, Biden helping the oil companies with business right now because, hey, it's an election year.
	Reagan helping the Iranians with all of this stuff.
	And maybe the best thing that could happen would be for Iraq to get us out of there.
	But of course... They were probably more likely to throw that president out in a coup, which is what they did to get the Shah into Iran.
	And with all of this, everybody's so upset about Lloyd Austin being hospitalized and nobody knowing about it.
	Doesn't that tell you just how unimportant he really is?
	Whether you're feeling like the blues...
	Or bluegrass.
	APS Radio has you covered.
	Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APSradio.com.
	The David Night Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲