All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 14, 2023 - The David Knight Show
03:02:20
The David Knight Show - 11/15/2023
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 15th of November.
Year of Our Lord, 2023.
Well, today we're going to take a look at a lot of fighting that went on in Congress.
A couple of fights in the...
some verbal, some physical, some threats in the Senate.
Are we going back to the pre-Civil War days?
Should we start handing out Preston Brooks awards to these people?
But it really is a snapshot of the times that we live in.
Right before this fourth turning.
We also see that people are waking up in massive ways.
We've got Chuck Norris now going real hard against the vaccine agenda.
Good to see him on our side.
We could certainly use Chuck Norris in this, in any fight.
But everybody is waking up to this now, finally.
One of the reasons why they're pushing us into war.
Don't let them do it.
We'll be right back. Well, yesterday we had the house Kill the impeachment resolution for Mayorkas.
We've had Johnson, with the help of Democrats, do a continuing resolution to push everything into 2024.
Of course, they don't want to work around Thanksgiving, but they keep pushing this and pushing this.
And of course, the impeachment, the border fight, all of this stuff, they want to preserve this for an election year.
Because this is just a political football.
You know they're not going to do anything about this.
Come on. I have been watching this stuff for decades.
I know how they try to preserve issues.
I know how upset they are that the Supreme Court took away Roe v.
Wade because that was another political football that they could keep forever and never have to do anything about it.
And so they just keep, you know, talking about it, punting it to next year is the way the headline reads from Breitbart.
And that's appropriate. Because this is just a spectacle.
This is bread and circuses.
It's a political football game.
And they're going to do nothing about it next year either.
They'll make a lot of noise and fury about it, and they will do absolutely nothing.
And this is our new speaker that is there.
Instead, what we see is they don't care about any of the issues that affect us.
They don't care about any of the existential issues that affect our country.
Instead, as we're going to see, it's about a bunch of petty personal grievances that they've got going.
And that goes all the way up to the former leader, McCarthy.
One of the most petty, backstabbing, literally backstabbing, somebody who voted to get him out.
Tennessee congressman here.
So the House voted 209-201 Monday night to silence a resolution introduced by Marjorie Taylor Greene to impeach Department of Homeland Security Secretary Mayorkas for his disastrous mishandling of the border.
She introduced the resolution last Friday, one day after two of her constituents were killed in a Texas head-on collision with a car that was driven by a human smuggler who was running from police.
So rather than voting on the underlying motion, Republican leadership chose to address the resolution through a Democratic motion to refer it to the Homeland Security Committee.
So here, go investigate yourself.
Green's resolution read that Majorca had engaged in, quote, a pattern of conduct that is incompatible with the laws of the United States, accusing him of, quote, willful admittance of border crossers, terrorist human traffickers, drugs, and other contraband.
It's something that he has in common with all the string of these people who preceded him, of course.
Going back to Obama and Jan Napolitano, who instituted an executive order saying, we're not going to enforce the law about immigration.
That's what DACA was.
Deferred action. No, we're just not going to enforce the law.
Johnson's decision to, Speaker Johnson's, to accede to the Democrats' demands to toss Majorca's impeachment into a committee recycling bin, is the way Breitbart puts it.
They're right. It comes the same afternoon as Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell announced support for Johnson's continuing resolution government plan.
The Johnson continuing resolution postpones the fight on border policy until February of next year.
Chip Roy in Texas is very angry about this.
He led opposition to the continuing resolution.
He said the fight on the border cannot be delayed any longer.
Chip Roy was one of the most vocal opponents of the Democrats of December's lame duck omnibus bill that set current spending levels and policies as well as the September continuing resolution that extended the omnibus spending through this Friday, two days from now.
And, of course, all that was instrumental in getting Kevin McCarthy thrown out of office.
And so, you know, meet the new boss.
Same as the old boss, right?
Johnson is doing everything that he opposed.
Funding the war in Ukraine and all the rest of this stuff.
I'd be happy to be here on Thanksgiving Day in order to fight to secure the border of the U.S., said Chip Roy.
But he's not going to have the opportunity to do that.
Johnson, by the way, also in the news cycle yesterday, said he wholeheartedly endorses Trump.
I am all in for Trump.
Because, you know, he shares a lot in common with Trump.
Both of them are completely phony on the border issue.
100% BS. I'm not talking about border security either.
They're the other BS. That's what they're 100% for.
Remember, the initials of border security, when you hear the Republicans talking about it, the initials are BS. The closest allies that Trump had in Congress, he said, I was one of the closest ones that he had in Congress, and he had a phenomenal first term.
No problem. Lockdowns, preparation for smart cities, freedom cities, that Trump's going to do.
Preparation for universal basic income with the stimulus checks.
Medical martial law.
Poisoning the entire globe with his shots.
Oh, it was a wonderful, phenomenal first term.
It truly was a phenomenon.
I would agree with him about that.
An evil phenomenon.
And of course, you know, Speaker Johnson, who makes such a parade of his Christian values, will support the man that has been one of the key movers and shakers from the very beginning of all this transgender insanity.
I played for you yesterday, the clips, going back to 2012.
I pointed out that as his Miss Universe pageant, he sold it, and then they sold it just a couple of years ago to a transgender man.
A man who says he's a woman.
And that's why you're seeing multiple winners in the Miss Universe contest.
And that's why the Miss Universe contest is going bankrupt, quite frankly.
But when this tranny bought Miss Universe, turned it into Miss Transverse, the whole thing went sideways on it.
He was saying, well, now the whole organization is going to be run by women, including me.
Get your high heels and makeup.
You know, it was funny.
When I started working at InfoWars, I was doing a lot of guest hosting as Alex was getting his divorce.
And we were on Sirius radio, satellite radio.
And, you know, after I guess about six months or so, they kicked us off.
Was it something I said?
You know, there might have been other factors involved or whatever.
There was issues with GCN, I think.
So it may not have been this, but I looked at it and I realized at that point that the CEO of Sirius Satellite Radio As a transgender, big pusher of that.
He was one of the first CEOs to say, I'm a woman.
When he wasn't a woman.
Female CEOs, but he was not one of them.
But he was noted as, you know, one of the first transgender CEOs.
I thought, wow. Certainly didn't help what I was saying on air.
I didn't know it when I was saying that.
Of course, it wouldn't have changed anything.
I still would have said it.
I really don't care. I really don't care.
I'm beyond worrying about audiences and jobs and all the rest of this stuff.
Anyway, but when you look at that, this guy who runs Sirius Radio, I forget what he calls himself now, but he's not really one of the first to push it.
Trump was there before him.
Trump was pushing it before this guy.
And yet, in April, this is what I didn't talk about yesterday, in April, Trump talks to the evangelicals, and he says, God created two genders, male and female.
Where do you read that? Was that in the Old Testament or the New Testament?
Well, it's actually in both of them, you know, but I don't know which one of those is his favorite.
You know, they ask him for his favorite verse, so maybe that's it right there.
Male and female, he created them.
But he doesn't live by that.
He's like one of these people like George Barna said when I had him on.
He said, yeah, you know, you have all these people who self-identify as evangelicals.
He says only 4% of them live that way.
Trump doesn't even identify as evangelical, except when he's at one of their meetings.
And then he throws them some dog whistles like that.
He rose to stardom, however, said Fox News back in April when he was making the statement.
He said, yeah, but the problem is he rose to stardom amongst the LGBT community when he overturned the rules of his own Miss Universe.
Well, you know, you've got to tell them what they want to hear, don't you?
And you can always count on the Trump media to hide his past.
They will flush it down the memory hole.
Over a decade ago, Trump famously overturned an earlier decision by the Miss Universe organization, which Trump owned from 1996 to 2015, to disqualify Canadian model Jenna Kalikova.
Then 23, because he was not a naturally born female.
Fox News uses the new pronoun.
Scroll down a little bit there and show pictures of this guy as a woman.
There he is. So that's a guy.
That's a guy. Trump reversed the decision and he said, we let her in.
I played that for you yesterday. And we'll see what happens.
Maybe she'll do well.
Maybe she won't.
You have 58 different girls.
No, you've got 57 girls, Donnie, and one man in your beauty contest running from this universe.
Days later, after holding discussions with GLAAD, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Definition, or Definition, they don't want the definition of gender that God created two people, right?
The Miss Universe organization under Trump, Announced a policy change to allow transgender women to take part in all these competitions beginning in 2013.
You see, this is way before this other guy was serious, was getting so serious about the LGBT agenda.
And then, as I said, he sold it to a tranny.
And, you know, this whole stuff really, I had never seen any of this stuff in my entire life.
There was Corporal Clinger, which was a joke.
And then there was the only other one that I was familiar with was Walter Carlos, the guy that switched on Bach.
Loved that album.
Loved what he did with all that stuff.
But... Then he got all caught up in his gender stuff and everything.
And underwent this gender operation and changed his name to Wendy Carlos.
And then after that, really, basically, he didn't really have anything.
He was just focusing on his navel or whatever, you know.
So Trump sold the company in 2015.
And then in 2022, they sold it to a Thai transgender and an activist.
And he has immediately bankrupted it with his transgender stuff.
Welcome to the Miss Universe organization, he said.
From now on, it's going to be run by women and owned by trans women for all women around the world to celebrate the power of feminism.
No, to celebrate the power of narrative is what it's about.
So, at the time they did this, again, this was in April, Fox News is not an apologist anymore for Trump.
They opposed him.
They asked the Trump campaign to comment about his past experience with Miss Universe and the transgender, since he's going around telling the evangelicals that, you know, hey, God created two genders.
You want to comment on this?
Of course, they would not comment on it, because the way they handle it is just to keep it quiet.
So, back in April, Trump released a video for the Iowa Faith and Freedom Coalition.
To kick off the spring event, promising a number of executive orders to protect children from left-wing gender lunacy.
And so what we have is a hypocrite leading the blind, leading the blind Christians.
Or maybe they know.
Maybe Mike Johnson knows and he doesn't care, just like he doesn't care about Ukraine anymore.
After opposing the whole thing, he doesn't care about the border anymore either.
You know, we use it for political purposes next year, but if he believed that it was an emergency, he'd do something about it now.
It's like the pandemic stuff, right?
As I said from the very beginning, if you believed that it was an emergency, then Biden and Macron and Trudeau and all these people, they say, well, you know, in two months, this is what we're doing today.
And in two months, we're going to take the next step.
And then two months after that, we take the next step.
And they would tell you that every time when they would lower the The hammer on us, they'd say, and then in two months we're going to do this.
And so I said, well, they obviously don't believe that it's an emergency or they'd do it all right now.
And so Mike Johnson obviously doesn't believe that this is an emergency.
The burner is not a problem.
You know, we can kick it out another four months and bring it up during the middle of the election cycle because that's all that is to them.
It's just a political football.
And so Trump doing the same thing with this.
We will defeat the cult of gender ideology.
We will reassert the timeless truth that God created two genders, male and female.
We will defend our culture.
We will reassert the Judeo-Christian values of our nation's founding.
What would those values be?
What's your favorite part of it?
What's your favorite Bill of Rights?
Which one of the ten is your favorite one?
Mr. Trump? Can you name one of them?
I'm not going to ask you to identify the parts of the First Amendment, but can you name even the purpose of one of them?
And so then let's go back to the House.
I said it was turning into an animal house.
You know, Congress may not be willing to fight for you or the Constitution, but they are willing to fight each other over petty grievances.
And so we got a senator who pushed a critic that had mocked him to fight right there in the Senate.
We got Kevin McCarthy stabbing somebody in the back with his elbow and the kidneys.
It's pretty amazing.
And did it in front of reporters and got it recorded live.
Truly amazing. But let's begin in the Senate.
And then we'll get to the Animal House.
This is in the Senate.
And so in the Senate, you've got Senator Mullen from Oklahoma and the Teamsters president, Sean O'Brien.
They don't like each other.
To put it mildly. And so they've had this back and forth in the past.
And last time in June, when they had some hearings, they called the Republican senator a clown, a fraud, said he didn't earn his living there, which he evidently did.
He inherited a plumbing business, but he worked really hard at it and expanded it.
But nevertheless, this guy says, this is what the Teamsters president said.
He said he's a greedy, they put this on Twitter, greedy CEO who pretends like he's self-made.
In reality, he's just a clown and a fraud.
Always has been, always will be.
Quit the tough guy act in these Senate hearings.
You know where to find me.
Anytime, anyplace, cowboy.
And look at this. He puts this up and he puts up hashtag little man.
And so he puts a picture of him standing at the podium.
Standing on a little, we call that an apple box, you know, in the studios.
Even whatever it's made out of.
But anyway, he circles that with a pink circle and calls him little man.
Because, you know, you want to make fun of people's height.
Little man syndrome.
Little man syndrome. And so, when I got to the hearing yesterday, Mullen says, recounted that.
And he says, okay, anytime, anywhere.
Cowboy says, we can finish it here.
Oh, by the way, to point out that Mullen, besides being a CEO, is also a former mixed martial arts fighter.
Which, if you look at the Teamster guy, he's not.
He's definitely not.
And so O'Brien says, okay, that's fine, perfect.
Mullen says, you want to do it now?
Yeah, I'd love to do it now, says O'Brien.
Well, stand your butt up then.
You stand your butt up.
And so he did.
Started to stand up.
As the two men stood their butts up, you've got Chairman Bernie Sanders trying to put the kibosh on the squabble.
Hold it. No, no.
Sit down. Sit down. You're the U.S. Senator right here.
This is a hearing.
The American people have got enough contempt for Congress.
Then they cut him off because they're still squabbling about this stuff.
But the best picture of all of this stuff, it was the one that Zero Hedge freeze-framed, and it's this.
Look at this guy's face.
He's right over the shoulder of the Teamster Union.
He's enjoying this.
Yeah, let's do it right now.
Let's do this whole thing.
And then it continues to go on.
After that point of what I just read to you, this is what happens.
And then in 22, when this guy was elected, what he said after he got elected was he wanted to bring the mob mentality back to the Teamsters.
This is your guy. And you're obviously going to give him a chance to respond to your questions.
Absolutely, because this is my question.
Because you called me out.
I didn't call you out. You said anytime, anyplace.
Let's get the record straight.
Hold it! No? Hold on.
Senator Mullen, you have a question for the witness.
Okay, let's hear it.
So, anytime, anyplace.
No, that's not... April is a charity event.
No, that's not...
No, it's a... He said it, and this is...
He is here to... No, you're not going to...
We're not going to be talking about physical confrontation.
Oh, this is about charity, for a union charity, because this is for firefighters and...
You have a question on his...
April, April...
You have a question on his...
You said it.
You're an embarrassment. You said it, and I'm just simply answering it.
Hold it, hold it.
Senator Mullen, you made some charges.
Mr. O'Brien, do you want to respond to the question?
Yeah, go ahead, please. Yeah, I mean, look, the reality of it is, you know, Mr.
Mullen... Tough guy.
Answer, hold it. Answer the questions.
Alright, you know one, if I, he made a lot of statements, right?
So that guy over his shoulder? Fiction, at best.
Fiction, I read them. What?
Answer the question, please.
I can't understand him, to be honest with you.
He rambles so much.
What was your question, actually?
You said I made a lot of statements.
No, but what's your question? I don't understand your question.
Could you repeat it? You said anytime, anyplace.
What's your question? Accept the challenge.
What challenge? I don't know what you just said.
I'm accepting yours, so why don't you come back?
What challenge? What challenge are you talking about? April 30th.
How about we do it for a charity at the Smoking Guns in Tulsa, Oklahoma?
We're not going to be talking about physical confrontations here.
You want to fight me? What do you say by anytime, anyplace?
Let's have coffee. Discuss our differences.
Oh, that's what you said. All right, well, let's say I don't have coffee.
Let's do it. It's funny how you're backing out.
I don't back on anything.
You did. You're the one.
You're a 100. You should be the most influential people in this country making changes.
You're focused on debate that's not even relevant.
You're an embarrassment.
You're an embarrassment. This hearing is about the condition of the working class in America.
You're the biggest thug here.
You're the biggest thug.
Why you do what you're doing, Senator Hassan?
Thank you very much, Mr.
Chair. Senator Mullen, please yield.
I've been recognized by the chair.
Yeah, well, you know, that's why we can't have nice things.
Like peace. Because you've got people like this Yeah, you got these union teamster presidents exploiting people.
Thugs. And then you got the senators.
This is simply, it is good for bread and circuses.
You know, this is better, I gotta say, than anything that Trey Gowdy ever did with Hillary Clinton.
But you never got to that point.
But that's what this is.
It's just a bunch of storm and fury signifying nothing.
They're gonna do nothing.
About all of these existential issues that are in front of us.
Instead, what they're going to do is they're going to push us continually into war.
So I think we ought to have trial by combat.
You know, let these people fight it out.
I think you get that mole in a room or make a charity event out of it, you know, but let them fight it out.
And then you have McCarthy and what he did.
But the other thing, before we get into McCarthy...
The other thing that happened, along with this impeachment of Majorca, you had the...
The bill that was brought up by Marjorie Taylor Greene.
And then you had Daryl Issa voted to kill the resolution.
He's one of eight Republicans who voted to kill this.
And then he bizarrely claimed, as Breitbart points out, that is true, it is bizarre claim, to say that he wants to be a witness against Majorca in a future impeachment hearing.
But let's not do it now. Let's not do it now.
And then he went on.
Besides making, after making that ridiculous claim, saying, well, I don't want to have him impeached today, but someday we're going to impeach him, and I'd like to be a witness.
Then he said, Marjorie Taylor Greene is a hardworking member of Congress, but I believe she lacks the maturity and the experience to understand what she was asking for.
Hmm. Okay.
So, she's stupid and immature.
Okay. So, then she replied that he lacked...
Let's just call it masculinity.
And so then, as that is happening, these two things are happening.
And then you've got Congressman Burchett from Tennessee.
He's being interviewed by a reporter with NPR. And as it is happening, he gets elbowed in the back in the kidneys by McCarthy.
Listen to this live interview.
What's that?
I'm going to check in on the conference, how it went.
It sounds like it went back and forth.
Yeah, I think it went all right.
Didn't mean to elbow.
Why'd you elbow me in the back, Kevin?
Hey, Kevin!
You got any guts? Jerk.
Has he done that before?
No.
Now they're running to catch up with him.
You got no guts.
They sit there and the reporter said it right there.
What kind of chicken move is that?
You're pathetic, man.
You are so pathetic. Thank you.
What a jerk.
You need security, Kevin.
Okay, and then he gave an interview outside, and he talked a little bit more detail.
What happened with you and Kevin McCarthy?
Well, I was doing an interview with Claudia from NPR, a lovely lady, and she was asking me a question.
And at that time, I got elbowed in the back, and it kind of caught me off guard because it was a clean shot to the kidneys.
And I turned back, and there was Kevin.
And for a minute, I was kind of, what the heck just happened?
And then I I chased after him, of course.
As I've stated many times, he's a bully with $17 million in a security detail.
He's the type of guy that, when you're a kid, would throw a rock over the fence and run home and hide behind his mama's skirt.
From behind, that kind of stuff.
That's not the way we handle things in East Tennessee.
If we have a problem with somebody, I'm going to look them in the eye and talk to them.
Okay, so he walked down the hallway, hit you with his elbow.
You can go on Claudia's Twitter account pretty much, or X account.
It's very accurate.
Okay, so then just explain. So you chased him?
What do you mean you chased him? I just ran after him.
I was like, what the heck? Why'd you do that?
Because it was, like I said, if you've ever been hitting the kidneys, it's a little different.
You don't have to hit very hard to cause a lot of pain.
And he just, of course, as he always does, he just denies it or blames somebody else or something.
And it was just a little heated, but I just backed off because I saw no reason.
I wasn't gaining anything from it.
Everybody saw it, so it didn't really matter.
But he responded to? Yeah, yeah.
He just acted like, you know, what are you talking about?
You know, who are you? You know, that kind of thing.
And it's just... I think that's symptomatic of the problems that he's had in his short tenure as Speaker.
And were you face-to-face when you had this interaction?
Yeah, but there's security detail, and I get it.
They were doing their job, so it wasn't exactly like he wouldn't turn around and face me.
He kept scurrying, trying to keep people between me and him.
Yeah. So, you know, again, it was Claudia Grisales of NPR that had that original hook.
She tweeted after that.
She says, I have, quote, all uppercase, never seen this on Capitol Hill.
Shoved Burchett. He shot at McCarthy.
Chase ensued. McCarthy denied.
He had elbowed him. You've got no guts.
He said, the reporter saw it.
It was right there. What kind of chicken move is that?
And then Birchit asked the reporter, did you see that?
And she said, yeah, I'm stunned too.
I'm stunned too.
And so he's not leaving it at that.
He has filed an ethics complaint against Kevin McCarthy.
We'll get for him. He handled it as he should have as a gentleman.
He called him out on it. He's going to file an ethics complaint rather than challenging him to some kind of a charity wrestling match or something.
But it is a symptom of the times that we're in, isn't it?
It was a few years before the Civil War, which we're coming up to one of those fourth turnings right now.
And feelings are just, you know, everybody wants a civil war.
Within the GOP, between the GOP and the Democrats, and within the Democrats and so forth, everybody wants to fight everybody else.
I suggest that maybe what...
Congressman Burchett should do is he should give Kevin McCarthy a Preston Brooks Award.
Preston Brooks...
It was a congressman from South Carolina, a speech a couple of days earlier.
This congressman, Charles Sumner, from Massachusetts, and as they were going back and forth on slavery, he made some insult to a relative of Preston Brooks, making an analogy that slavery was like a prostitute that he was wedded to or something like that.
And so when Preston Brooks caught up to him on the floor of the Senate a couple of days after that, he caned him.
Beat him with a cane.
We're at that time again.
We're at that fourth inning.
We're at that time of civil war.
And you even see it within the House and the Senate.
Syrian girl, let's see, has a geese buster, says, the world is laughing at us.
Yeah, you're absolutely right.
It is a lot of circuses.
ON61 says, this ain't the first time members of Congress came to blow.
It happened in the good old golden days.
That's right. Yeah, at another fourth turning.
KWD68, it's amazing to me how base and vulgar this nation has become, yet so thin-skinned.
That's a big part of it, isn't it?
Oh, Brian Potty, thank you very much.
That is very generous.
I appreciate that. Tip on Rumble.
Says, thank you, David. All the best to you and your family.
Another morning of warm fire and hot coffee here in Alberta.
Well, enjoy it.
That sounds great. Syrian girl says, who would have expected Colonel Sanders to be the adult in the room?
You've got to stop it right now.
Burchett should prefer charges for assault.
That's a dangerous punch, yeah.
Yeah, that's true. Call the Capitol Police.
I'm sure they would really care.
That's the other thing about this, is that lawless government that we have.
Okay, we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
Interested in a curated list of the finest classical music?
Find it now at APSradio.com. APSradio.com
APSradio.com
sense. Common again.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
The honor seeker says, if only Kevin McCarthy would have been that tough when it came to standing up for America.
Well, he did stab us in the back, didn't he?
He essentially gave us an elbow in the back.
As Trump was stabbing us in the arm, he was stabbing us in the back.
Georgia boy, 1142, now they're acting like schoolgirls.
No business. Yeah, great optics, says honor seeker.
Matthew Ronson, he isn't the speaker, he's the carnival barker.
Johnny Freedom, we're witnessing the last days of Rome.
A2 Brutus, yeah. So, you know, as all this is happening, borders wide open, they're going to use it as a political football, but we've got people who are still being injected and killed.
And they're not going to pull any of this stuff back.
Instead, though, we do have everybody starting to wake up to this.
More data from Steve Kirsch points out that he got some data from the Republic of Maldives showing how deadly the Trump GCI, genetic code injections, were for them.
He said...
An unidentified source had provided him with complete record-level vaccination and death data from the Maldives Health Ministry for 2021 and 2022.
The source says that it shows that, quote, death rate increased by 50% within the first six months of vaccination.
And then it increased again with the October 2021 boosters.
Kirsch says, can you guess why no country in the world is voluntarily releasing this data?
And why nobody in our Congress is talking about it?
We've got Senator Ron Johnson who's held some hearings.
You've got, you know, in the UK, you've got one member of parliament out of, what was it, about 600 people in parliament.
Only one of them is interested, you know.
And out of nearly as many in our U.S. Congress, only one is interested.
Everybody else is ignoring it or misdirecting you to the Wuhan lab.
He said the island's nation population, quote, learned very quickly that the Trump shots were a disaster.
He doesn't call it the Trump shots.
I will call it the Trump shots because Trump wants credit for it.
Let's give the guy the credit.
Don't call them COVID vaccines.
They're not a vaccine.
It's a genetic code injection.
And there wasn't a pandemic.
It was a plan executed by Trump.
Call it what it is.
Give the bastard his credit.
Substantially dropped for subsequent doses, he said.
It was 88% for the first dose to barely more than one-third of 1% for the second booster.
The vaccination rates, that is, not the death rates.
So after the first one, 88% of the people signed up for the first one because of what they were told in the media.
And by the government. And then after that, it was one-third of one percent signed up for the second one.
And they still had a massive number of people die.
It goes up with each shot.
That's Maldives.
The country's death rate doubled from 100 to 200 per month.
Two months after the shots rolled out there, No explanation from the authorities.
Don't talk about this.
Yeah, we did this for Klaus.
You know, lean forward and whisper in the air.
Hail Hydra. Hail Hydra.
Last month, Kirsch released the results of a survey that he conducted with more than 10,000 readers.
You know, when you see these scientific surveys, they're typically about 1,000 people.
Now, of course, the thing that's key about that is that they are not self-selected.
They are selected at random.
And so when people choose to participate in a poll, that is going to put in some bias in it.
But nevertheless, what Kirsch says, he said, this is more reliable as data.
He asked people if they knew someone who was, let's see, was it limited to a family member or He did this with 10,000 people.
In my survey, each of the responses, he said, can be verified independently by a team of independent scientific adjudicators because I collected contact information for each of the respondents.
In this case, we can obtain medical records, detailed case histories for each of the respondents.
He said each death can be judged by a panel of qualified experts.
And so they asked them for people that they knew.
And family members and got their contact information.
So in case somebody wanted to look into this, they could validate that, yeah.
He said, of the 10,000 people, he said, 804 deaths from COVID and 2,830 deaths from the Trump shot.
The survey clearly showed that the Trump shots have killed three and a half times as many people as the, we should call that, the Trump shots, we call it the GCI, the genetic code injectors.
I guess the other stuff is about neglect, ventilators, remdesivir.
So we call that NVR. So we have the Trump GCI and we have the hospital NVRs.
Neglect, ventilators, and remdesivir.
The death protocol.
But the Trump genetic code injections were even more effective at the planned democide.
And so there's a new documentary out, and you'll find this referenced at expose-news.com.
The documentary is called Shot Dead.
I haven't seen it, but when I see that, I keep thinking back to that Trump quote.
My people, my people love me so much I could shoot somebody dead on, what was it, Fifth Avenue or something?
Well, he shot dead a lot of people.
Shot dead a lot of children.
This is the first film that focuses on the deeply personal aspect of devastation unleashed by the Trump shot and the mandates, the Biden mandates.
As told by the families who lost loved ones, the film will make you cry, the film will make you think.
This film will prompt you to take action for children everywhere.
Well, let's hope so. You know, that's why we should...
Again, that's going to be something that's going to motivate people, hopefully, to action.
Films can be very visceral, and especially when you see something like the procedure, talking about abortion.
I tell you, the way they are coming after humanity, it truly is satanic, isn't it?
And... As all this is happening, CDC has confirmed 58,000 children were injured by the shots.
15,000 were hospitalized.
1,200 were left disabled and 163 died due to the Trump shot by October of 2022.
So he did more than shoot one person in the street.
Trump injured 58,000 children.
12 of them were left permanently disabled, and 163 of them died from the shots of Trump.
So, I said, was the committee aware?
Because we just had, just over a year ago, you had the CDC and their committee added the Trump shot and To their immunization schedule for children aged six months and older.
So now I guess we've got like 73 shots that you're supposed to get, including your Trump shot.
And so they say, was that committee aware that 1,201 of these children either suffered a life-threatening event or permanent disability?
Well, of course they are.
Are we aware that they are capable of killing people for money?
And are we aware of why they added this to the schedule?
They added it to the schedule for liability issues.
And of course, nobody in Congress is going to ever touch that Fauci legislation.
The 1986 Act that created VAERS and all the rest of the stuff and gave the pharmaceutical companies immunity to harm children.
What a despicable act that is.
And it's even more despicable that no one, not a single person, they'll talk a little bit, well, let's talk about these, your experiences with the Trump shot and all the rest of this stuff, but not a single one of them will touch that.
That's more sacrosanct to them than the Constitution or any of the Bill of Rights.
That 1986 act giving legal immunity to the pharmaceutical companies is more sacrosanct to them Than any Bill of Rights amendment, than anything else in the Constitution.
New research shows that COVID vaccinations led to millions of people dying.
This is the Chuck Norris story that I talked about, and it goes on for like seven or eight pages where he's making the case to people, finally.
He says, over the past several months, I've been barraged.
With scientific studies and previously undisclosed government documents which have shown that these vaccinations led to millions of deaths and continue to do so.
So Chuck Norris says, I was compelled to pass this research along to Americans and all people of the world whom I love dearly to allow them to make up their own minds.
And so, as I said, it goes on and on and on.
First one he's got here.
Conservative public interest advocacy group defending the republic has obtained 15,000 pages of Moderna's clinical trial data claiming the data shows, quote, an utter lack of thoroughness of the trials and calls the vaccine's safety into serious doubt.
It gets better.
I mean, because we all knew that, and we've known that for quite a while.
And, of course, we all knew from the very beginning That Trump called it warp speed because he's going to skip all the testing.
Nobody's ever done it this fast before because nobody else could get away with getting rid of the testing.
Hillary Clinton couldn't have gotten away with getting rid of the testing.
Only somebody that's got a massive cult following of the very people who would have been the ones to oppose this, only that person could get away with suspending all the testing.
And it was the only test It was a test of the gullibility of the public, especially the Trump followers.
And so he goes on for seven or eight pages of references here, Chuck Norris does.
And again, it's another sign that everybody is waking up to this.
Everyone is waking up to this.
That's why they want to take us to war.
That's why we've got to resist that.
Don't get drawn into this tit-for-tat one side or the other.
There's crimes and every war and the essence of war is evil and awful.
And so it's not hard to tell the truth about what happened to your side and then omit what you're doing to the other side.
So he finishes the article With this from a person who is an international banker, says he and his mother are dying from these vaccines.
But of course, he was also, his father was one of the co-founders of the World Economic Forum there in Switzerland.
Geneva looks beautiful.
It is beautiful. It has a lake.
It has a shadow. It's very peaceful.
But there is a dark side to it.
Everything evil in the world related to demo side unfortunately comes from Geneva.
You have WHO in Geneva.
You have Gavi.
Then you have the WEF, the World Economic Forum, which my father was a co-founder and left Karl Schwab out of disgust in the early 80s, that has diplomatic immunity.
I, as a Swiss citizen, right here now, declare that the WEF is not eligible anymore for diplomatic immunity.
I call on the Swiss authorities and security to arrest those people immediately.
Why the WEF? WHO, Gavi, Big Pharma, Big Tech, Bill Gates, all advocated a global humanity injection by a bioweapon injecting nanolipids into 5.7 billion people.
And we Swiss are hosting them?
That's terrible. We cannot tolerate any entity that promotes poison to be injected into humanity.
But you've done it.
I'm the victim. I'm dying from it.
And my mother too. It's a democide and you'll be judged.
It will be corrected in the name of humanity.
Maybe there is a Geneva-Swiss syndrome, but definitely there is a UN syndrome.
Because people are so afraid of what's going on because the United Nations is occupied, but people in there don't understand.
Those who understand, keep quiet or try to speak in different ways to help people to wake up.
So if you understand that, you know that this was very easy to carve a world government.
If you don't have a force that stops that and says, we the people is more important.
And that's what we're doing now.
We're trying to build a we the people movement that is very global.
Something completely different.
But what is going on in Geneva is the opposite at the moment.
There is no right to WHO to give any orders to dictate to the whole world like they have done.
And the Global Alliance for Vaccine Immunization, GAVI, got total immunity from the Swiss government.
You can find this admin.lex in the Swiss database.
Go and look. This is a coup d'état, clearly.
It's a global crime scene.
And we are bringing little pieces of evidence to people with humility, because in science, you always have a doubt.
It's a healthy doubt.
And I think that is a very important attitude.
I believe personally, Geneva has a better future.
Swiss neutrality has to be restored.
We have no future not being neutral.
The young people who survive through this will be the guarantors, hopefully, that such institutions can never again take foothold in our blessed country.
Never again. The snake head is in Geneva.
I call it a direct, clear and present danger to the Swiss population, but I can tell you it is being cut off.
If you have a house of cards, and this is a house of cards of a criminal, one card pulled by Justice and the whole card house collapses.
But from hope alone it is not done.
Everybody must now change the spirit.
And all the vaccinated, the injected, knowing that they are poisoned.
We are the masses.
We are billions of people. Let's just stand up and say, stop.
We will not comply.
And in French, ni oubli ni pardon.
Because we are the guardians of humanity and our light obliterates the darkness of evil.
Always. Well, again, Christ is the light that obliterates evil.
We are just his spokespeople here.
But as he said, one card in this house of card.
If we get one of these people prosecuted, that's why they're hanging together.
That's why they'll fight amongst themselves.
They'll talk about trivial issues that we don't care about.
They'll have very carefully controlled debates where these questions are not asked.
They didn't even want to get these guys talking about, well, I pulled back before you did pull back and all the rest of the stuff.
Because then, of course, the obvious question is, why did you do it in the first place?
And it feeds the understanding of what is going on.
Look, a lot of people have been poisoned.
A lot of people are dying. A lot of people have died.
And that's why to keep people from coming after them, it's just a matter of time before somebody comes after them, unless they can start a global war.
That's why the war aspect is so important, why I'm going to oppose it so completely.
And you should oppose it as well.
And when you look at this, how in the world, again, he's not naming names of any politicians, you know, but he talks about Klaus Schwab and these organizations that are there.
And we know who their puppets are.
By their deeds, you will know them.
If they do what Klaus Schwab wants, they're Klaus Schwab's puppets.
And they did this for a very long time, and they continue to brag about it, Trump.
And when you look at the whole GOP, he said we can't tolerate any entity.
That injects poison into people.
And yet, that's exactly what the MAGA cult has become.
They not only tolerate Trump, they champion him.
And that's what we see in the Trump press of people like Wayne Allen Root and Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson and on and on and on, Steve Bannon and all the rest of the...
They tolerate the poisoner.
They promote him.
And I don't know anybody else that could have gotten away with this.
The big lie, the biggest lie, was that Trump was an anti-globalist.
They sold that.
They hammered that. They had this guy preening around like he's on a professional wrestling ring.
I'm the anti-globalist.
I'm the anti-globalist. And then he does, he makes the whole globalist agenda come true.
And of course, the Democrats objected to it until Biden became president, and then their tribalism, they're controlled, and so now it's a good thing, and you must have it.
And the Republicans would not push back against it.
You had Mark Levin and people of his ilk.
Trump, you need to take credit for this.
Don't let Biden take credit for your shot.
And then, not until Trump stops patting himself on the back for this did GOP start to talk about this.
But they're not going to do anything about it.
Because as I said before, this is murder on the Warp Speed Express, where every single one of them stabs you in the back.
Every single one of them has blood on their hands.
A whole lot of them, they're going to answer for that one day.
And so, one of the organizations that's there in Geneva that he's talking about, the World Health Organization, part of the UN, the World Health Organization, give you an idea of what great guys these are.
The World Health Organization went to the Congo between 2018 and 2020.
They were there because it was supposedly an Ebola outbreak.
And then they raped women there.
And when they found out about it, they compensated them $250 for the rape.
I don't know what a going rape for a prostitute is in New York or L.A. or whatever.
That's... Probably less than you'd get with a prostitute.
Nearly two dozen workers from the UN agency, the World Health Organization, preyed on more than 100 Congolese women with dozens of staffers raping, sexually abusing, and otherwise harassing local women.
Now, one of the things that stood out to me about this is the fact that, you know, they're there in the midst of a supposed Ebola epidemic.
Would you think, you know, these guys are such, well, maybe they don't believe that there's any Ebola there at all.
Or maybe they are just such horned dogs that they don't even care about Ebola.
You know, they're just going to rape everyone in sight.
I don't know what the deal is with these people.
One of the victims, identified as Jolene, was believed to be 13 years old.
Some of the women were forced by their rapists to get abortions.
In the case of Julianne, the 13-year-old, a WHO driver stopped on a roadside in the town of Magina where she was selling phone cards in April of 2019 and offered to give her a ride home.
Instead, he took her to a hotel where she said she was raped, according to a 2021 UN report.
WHO Director General Tedros traveled to Congo 14 times during the Ebola outbreak, repeatedly taking credit for the response to the outbreak while publicly commending one of the alleged rapists for his heroic work.
Again, these people rape and kill the world.
And obviously, I don't think, you know, you look at Ebola, this is a very serious disease if you get it.
You're bleeding, you die bleeding out of your nose and your ears and your eyes and anything.
A horrific way to die, they either don't believe that it's happening there, or again, they are so sexually depraved that they don't even care about that.
And maybe that is the case.
You know, what do we call this WHO? I guess it's worldwide hell and oppression is what it really stands for, isn't it?
All this was known two years ago.
Senior WHO management was informed of sexual exploitation during the agency's efforts to curb Ebola.
But they did little to stop it.
Instead, they went there and raped women.
According to a new report from the Associated Press, internal documents now reveal that the agency paid 104 victims $250 each, an amount which is less than a single day's expenses for some of the UN officials working on the Congolese capital.
But it can support more than four months of survival in a country where many people live on less than $2 a day.
And so what the UN officials are saying is, well, you know, we took all this stuff into consideration.
And, you know, if we were to get...
People are surviving on $2 a day, somehow, there in the Congo.
If we were to give them more than $250, it would just destroy their lives.
That's their rationale. That's the reasoning that they say.
We take into consideration all this stuff, and if we give them too much money, it's going to be harmful for them.
You mean they might turn into somebody like you?
Who will rape? Who will kill?
Who will destroy for money?
You mean, you're speaking from experience here, right?
Because you've been totally corrupted by money.
So we don't want to turn those people into someone like me, for example, they say, right?
The women had to complete a training course to help them to start, quote, income-generating activities, unquote, before they'd give them the cash.
And they said, well, we do that because the UN doesn't pay reparations.
Because this is not their first rodeo.
It's not the first time we've had a bunch of UN staff go somewhere and rape everybody in sight.
The WHO said about nearly a dozen women declined its offer.
Are you going to pay me off like a prostitute?
No. Two women who met with a doctor said...
The doctor who leads the WHO's efforts to prevent sexual abuse told her that what they wanted was for the perpetrators to be brought to account so they would not harm anyone else.
But again, understand that this is just part of their per diem expenses.
These people are making...
The documents show that...
Here, I've got it on the next page here.
Yeah. Their daily allowance ranged between $144 a day and $480 a day.
So for the people on the upper end, you know, paying off one of these people that they raped is only half of what they get as a per diem.
And that is in addition to their salary.
They get the per diem rape expense added to it.
Itemize that on your expense account.
According to the WHO, the criteria to determine its victim survival package, package, $250.
They call it a package.
They looked at it. They said, well, we looked at the cost of food in the Congo and, quote, global guidance on not dispensing more cash than would be reasonable for the community in order to not expose recipients to further harm, unquote. Yeah, $250.
It's for their own good. One person said she was pressured into having sex with a WHO official in exchange for a job as an infection control worker with the Ebola response team.
Again, these people don't believe that there's a pandemic there, or they're so depraved that they don't even care.
They've got to satisfy their urge to rape people.
And so, yeah, before we quit, one last article here.
A.I., They say, can predict heart attack risk up to 10 years in the future, says an Oxford study.
Well, I can do it with just one question.
How many shots have you had from Trump?
And I can predict your heart attack risk.
It's not very difficult to do that.
But of course, we're going to have our doctors and our doctors' orders.
It's not going to be recommendations.
It's going to be orders from these people.
It's one of the reasons why we didn't want the government running health care.
Death panels, like we saw with the little toddler, Indy, in the UK. And death panels, like we saw in the hospital death protocols.
Nope. No care for you.
Come back later. We'll give you some stuff that's going to kill you when you get really sick.
That type of thing. That's why you don't want government involved in healthcare.
It wasn't Hillary that took his...
Hillary tried and failed to take over healthcare and put it under government control.
It was Trump who was able to do it with this fake pandemic.
Let's get the comments here before we take a break.
Audi, Modern Retro. Thank you very much.
That's very kind. That's generous.
I appreciate that. He says, this evening I'll be taping an interview with Jason Barker and Handy to run on Modern Retro Radio soon.
In addition to this tip, I'll be doing a $100 match.
Well, thank you very much.
I appreciate that. Thank you very much.
And... I know you've already done a couple of interviews with Jason Barker, and I haven't had the time to listen to them yet.
I don't even have time to sleep anymore, it seems like.
I've got other things that I'm trying to get done as well that are outside of just the content for the show, so I apologize.
It's not that I'm not interested.
He does have the interview.
We'll be on Modern Retro Radio.
So thank you very much, Aldi.
Appreciate that. David Coburn, thank you very much for the tip on Rockfin about these Who Rapists, WHO. These guys don't see themselves as humans, obviously, said Distorted Perceptions.
The excess deaths are up 35% in Singapore since the COVID vaccines, says Arim.
Handy says getting it on the vaccine schedule was the very last thing they did before ending the quote-unquote emergency.
Remember when Biden projected ending the emergency in three or four months?
Yeah, that's right. Yeah, it's not an emergency if you know exactly when it's going to end, is it?
And he says, I don't know what the number is here.
I just know that we have young people in their 20s and 30s dropping dead occasionally, not as prolific as before, but the chronically ill are way higher.
Jonas says, safe and effective democide.
That's what it truly is about.
Yeah. It's worth it if we can just say one life.
That's true. It is true.
And that's what we try to do.
You know, it's very heartening to have people say that it does help, you know, the information to get.
You know, it's the story that a friend of mine said about adoption.
And, you know, the story of the man's walking along a beach and there's all these stranded starfish just everywhere as far as you could see.
And he picks up one and throws it into the sea so it can survive, and somebody comes up to him and says, so, what difference do you think that's going to make?
And he says, well, it made a difference to that one.
And that's why we do this.
Whether you're talking about the fake pandemic, or whether you're talking about the fake election protest on January the 6th, sometimes some people listen.
Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles!
And the sweet sounds of Motown.
Find them on the Oldies channel at APSradio.com.
The Oldies channel at APSradio.com.
The Oldies channel at APSradio.com.
All right. By the way, I have a question from DGA. David, where can we find a link to that video?
The video of the guy who was the son of one of the co-founders of the World Economic Forum talking about Geneva, all the rest of that.
That is at the end of that Chuck Norris article.
And Chuck Norris' articles are at WND. It used to be World Net Daily.
And it's at the...
So you'll find his article at WND. We put it up yesterday.
I'm sure it'll still be there. Chuck Norris'.
They keep Chuck Norris' articles up for a couple of days.
So just go to that article and you'll see it at the very end.
Dougalug, thank you very much for the tip.
I appreciate that. Thank you very much.
Let's talk a little bit about...
Some news updates. Of course, we had the manuscript, or manifesto, I should say, of the killer who shot nine-year-old kids point-blank because of the crime of being white, this tranny killer.
And so the Tennessee Star, which is in Nashville, along with other people, including other organizations, including the National Police Association, So we need to release this.
It's the FBI that's holding it.
The Metropolitan National Police Department was going to release it, but then they changed their story after the FBI got involved.
And so they have sued the FBI, the Tennessee Star, the National Police Association, and others have sued to show this manifesto.
And so and then after this was released, they filed a brief for the court asking for them, for the FBI to at least since the stuff was now public.
To at least comment it on one way or the other and either verify or discredit the fact that it was for real bailout.
But of course, the Nashville mayor and the Nashville Police Department effectively verified it by their statements.
Inadvertently, perhaps.
And certainly the Nashville Police Department verified it by putting seven police officers on leave and being rumored that two of them were going to be fired.
So there's your verification.
But No, the FBI is stonewalling over all of this.
And so what we have seen is that not only was the motivation at least partially racism, kill all the crackers, we've also seen that the FBI has a motivation to hide hate crimes of certain types.
And so as this killer...
Expressed at great length her hatred for white people, in particular her animus for white children at the Christian school, the FBI will not say whether or not they're handling the investigation as a hate crime.
And the Tennessee Star has asked them about that, but they won't comment on that.
Zip! Not going to say anything.
As this matter is being addressed by the courts, the FBI will not be commenting on the reporting documents, said their public affairs person.
So, even though it was published online by conservative comedian Stephen Crowder, that's a good way to describe Stephen Crowder.
Comedian. Comedian.
The FBI is taking cover behind ongoing lawsuits demanding the manifesto's release.
And then the Tennessee Star points out, you remember when this happens and it's used by the Biden administration immediately?
The Biden Department of Justice was very quick to charge other people with hate crimes.
As a matter of fact, they jumped the gun on it sometimes.
But not when it is going in one direction.
So if they can say that this is something that's perpetrated by white supremacists, oh, they'll be there real quickly.
On one page, Hale writes, I want to kill all you little crackers, a bunch of little, well, I won't say, with your white privileges.
And it doesn't spell privileges correctly, by the way.
Because, you know, when you're in schools, They don't teach you.
They don't learn you know reading and writing.
They just learn you how to hate, right?
You come out of there completely ignorant and hateful.
That's what our schools produce.
It's time to defund these institutions.
Hateful, ignorant, mentally deranged person.
A perfect product of the schools.
Self-hating. This was a white person.
Who also hates her body so much.
Everything about, not just her skin color, but her gender as well.
It's an important legal question beyond criminal penalties.
Tennessee law is very clear that victims of hate crime are also allowed to seek special civil damages from their attackers, said the Chattanooga Bar Association.
As the Federalist noted, when a gunman in Buffalo, New York, opened fire at a grocery store, killing 10 people in 2022, Biden's Department of Justice used the shooter's racist social media posts as justification to deem the act a hate crime and an act of racially motivated violent extremism.
But the Justice Department extended the same treatment to Dylann Roof.
As a matter of fact, Dylann Roof, the guy who murdered you, goes to this prayer meeting.
Well, I think it was nine black people.
And in a prayer meeting, he murders them.
It's unbelievable. And they said it was all about race.
Maybe it was all about race.
Maybe he hated Christians, too.
I don't know. But they found a Confederate flag, and so Nikki Haley banned the Confederate flag everywhere in South Carolina.
And the Texas mass shooter who killed 23 people in an El Paso Walmart.
So they're very quick to jump on that.
But, you know, when it goes the other way, And it's a crime committed by one of their favorite groups.
They say nothing about it.
Similar to this is the death of this 17-year-old, a Las Vegas teen.
I'm not going to play the video.
It's just disgusting to watch him beaten to death by a mob of 15 bullies at his school.
You know, bullying is the basis for all this transgender gaslighting.
We don't want people to be bullied.
Well, you know, bullying has always been a part and it really has become out of control because there is no discipline in the schools.
And I don't, I never did like the discipline.
I never got into any issues where I had to get sent to the deans, but every year they would, the beginning of school year, the dean of boys, also the dean of women would come out and they'd address the group of people, you know, boys over here, girls over here, and they would show us their paddles and talk about what they're going to do to us if we got sent to them.
So you better not do it, you know, that type of thing.
Well, I don't do any of that kind of stuff anymore.
And I completely reject everything about schools, government schools, institutions.
This is a communist plot, folks.
I know I sound like Archie Bunker, but hey, if it's the truth, I don't care what it sounds like.
It is a communist plot, as Shiva and Fleet pointed out.
They want to raise the kids from an early age, and they want to raise them to completely change the culture, set them against their family and all the rest of the stuff.
It is a communist plot.
It's exactly what they did in Mao's China.
It's what they're doing in Mao's America.
It's her book. And so, you know, they...
They have these institutions, and of course they don't want the kids punished because they've taken the same approach that George Soros has with his district attorneys.
We want chaos. And so the bullying, which has always been there, when you get a bunch of kids and one adult who is not their parent, you're going to wind up with a Lord of the Flies type of thing.
And then if you don't have any discipline whatsoever, it really does evolve into this.
And so what happened was a 17-year-old intervenes in a fight where some smaller kid is getting beaten up.
And so then a couple of them start to fight him, but they can't beat him because he's bigger than they are.
So they go away and they come back with a gang of 15.
And they beat him and they got him on the ground.
They just kept kicking him until he killed him.
And if you look at the video of it happening, this kid is white.
And the people who are beating him are black, but even Breitbart's not going to say anything about it.
And the father says, well, I'm really angry that people are making this racial.
How do you know that it's not racial?
Because that is a thing, right?
But we're not supposed to.
They would immediately jump to that conclusion if it were the other way around.
And, but of course, there's not, you know, they're not saying that they're going to do anything to these kids.
And of course, they won't.
You know, and why do we, why do we say that this is likely that this has happened?
You know, well, what he said was a large percentage of the mob appears to be black, leading to some incendiary comments.
This is Daily Mail, actually, saying, about the attack being racially motivated.
And the father condemned the racist reactions that some people have had to the footage, which he branded a disgrace to my son's memory.
So the problem is that we know that the schools are constantly doing quote-unquote incendiary comments about white people.
We're slavers, we're crackers, we are colonizers, all the rest of this stuff.
What they're doing is they're creating a sense of entitlement to use violence.
Against white people, just as they've created a sense of entitlement to use violence by the transgenders against Christians.
They were very public about that.
You even had Stink Uygur of the Young Turds saying, well, I'm normally against guns, but I think that the trannies need to have it to defend themselves and even go on offense about this stuff.
And so the schools are a seminary to inculcate hate, violence, and ignorance.
Everybody's got privilege, but they can't even spell it.
That's what her manifesto shows.
She hates everybody for privilege.
She doesn't even know what it is.
She can't even spell the word.
But she knows how to hate.
It is Mao's schools.
Not just Mao's America.
It's Mao's schools.
And if you oppose tyranny, you're probably on a list of the FBI. They have their AGAVE, Anti-Government, Anti-Authority, Violent Extremist List.
Well, I guess I'm there.
I've been called an extremist by the ADL. We're saying that what Trump did was medical martial law.
They can't accuse me of violence, but they could accuse me of being anti-government, anti-authority extremists.
I'm certainly guilty on that.
It's always disconcerting to find more proof that the FBI is every bit as dangerous, psychopathic, anti-American organization that it appears to be, says this article from American Thinker.
Whenever I refer to it as the Fascist Bureau of Intimidation, A little voice in my head asks, is that entirely fair?
And then when I see how it has agaved anti-government, anti-authority, violent extremists, half of the population onto a terrorist watch list, I realize that I'm not even being critical enough.
Yeah, forget the deep state, folks.
This is the dark state.
It is very dark.
It's dark, and it is also depraved.
The Department of Justice busted a high-end brothel network used by politicians, military officers, pharmaceutical executives, high-tech executives, doctors.
Government contractors, all the people who have security clearances, of course.
You know, a high-end brothel in Washington, D.C. is basically going to be a honey trap to blackmail people.
But is it possible to blackmail people in a city that is so morally depraved as the district of criminals and corruption?
Do these people even really care?
Yeah, so what?
You know, I'm a prostitute, so what?
I don't care. I mean, is that blackmail even a thing anymore for them?
But of course, when they pick them up, they are, you know, they were charging, they were in an area where these people are in Washington, D.C., so they were charging $350 to $600 per hour.
You know, the WHO only has to pay the people they rape $250 an hour, but these are high-priced hookers.
Because that's what Washington is filled with.
Whether they're engaging in sex or not, they're a bunch of high-priced prostitutes.
To conceal the proceeds, the defendants are believed to have deposited thousands of dollars of cash through peer-to-peer transfers and their personal bank accounts.
And this is what they're going to come after them for.
Just like Dennis Hastert, who was a pedophile rapist as a wrestling coach, And they groomed him for Congress, the Republicans did, and then he became the longest serving Speaker of the House for the Republicans, Dennis Hastert.
And Dennis Hastert, you know, statute of limitations, they make sure they keep that really short.
So he didn't have to answer for those crimes.
But what he was doing was trying to conceal, they asked him when he was taking out large amounts of money, why he was taking out large amounts of money.
Like, oh, well, yeah.
So he started structuring his withdrawals so they wouldn't ask him these questions.
So then they charged him and convicted him and sent him to jail for taking out money to avoid being spied upon by the banking system.
That's how perverted our system is.
They won't send you to jail for raping a child.
But they'll send you to jail for taking your own money out of your own bank account in a way that the Stasi snitches at the bank won't report you.
You can't even make a case that they should know when you take money out.
Because it's not about trying to avoid taxes.
You've already put the money in.
There's already a record that you've got an income in.
So why would they focus on you taking that money out?
Why would they make that a crime?
And of course, the only crime that we have anymore is FinCEN.
F-I-N-C-E-N. The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.
But the only sins that they care about are the financial sins.
And the only reason they care about these people engaged in the prostitution is because they're wondering if they gave away some of the secrets of the government.
Because we have a government that is filled with secrets.
And then you look at the FDIC. And what is going on with that group?
Strip clubs.
Photos of their genitals to coworkers and booze.
And I always thought that the FDIC stood for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
But now we know what it really stands for.
This is standard practice there.
Toxic work environment, strip club visits, sex with underlings, drinking at work.
Male workers sending female co-workers photos of their genitals.
All that was part of the day-to-day culture at the FDIC. It must be like working with Stephen Crowder.
Wall Street Journal found this.
They said, despite the allegations, these people are still on the payroll of the FDIC. Of course they are.
Because that is the culture of Washington.
You talk about the country rotting from the head down.
Countries, institutions, and all the rest of this stuff.
I don't know how much more rotten the head of our country can be.
But LA is a literal dumpster fire.
We can see this with the dumpster fire that happened under the 10 freeway there in LA. You may have seen pictures of it.
It was an amazing blaze.
It shut down the interstate.
It was an act of arson.
More than 100 columns.
Along the freeway were damaged, 9 or 10 of them severely.
And to replace those 9 or 10 columns severely damaged, maybe they have to replace the other 100 columns, I don't know.
But to replace those 9 or 10 columns is going to take several weeks as governor nuisance.
And it costs a lot of money.
The situation poses a commuting challenge that LA has not seen in years.
Hundreds of thousands of commuters facing detours, heavier than normal traffic.
The gridlock resulted from the closures.
The fire began under an overpass, fueled by wood pallets stored there.
But that's not the fuel.
It's not the wood pallets.
If you continue to read this story, Newsom said it was malicious intent.
Nuisance, I should say.
Nuisance says it was arson.
And the pallets were there, the wood pallets were there, holding...
Hand sanitizer.
Hand sanitizer was a secret ingredient of this dumpster fire in L.A. Leftover hand sanitizers from the COVID pandemic.
So-called pandemic.
What? It just all fits.
That's the dumpster fire that began in this country in 2020.
And now it's literally a dumpster fire.
It helped to fuel the flames.
Well, you're not going to have something that looked like that.
That literal explosion.
Hand sanitizer is filled with alcohol and stuff like that.
By the way, you know, if you stop and think about it, all this massive amount of hand sanitizers, it's kind of like Molotov cocktails.
That's probably what people should have done with this hand sanitizer, you know, just use it as a Molotov cocktail against the medical martial law.
Timothy Garrison, 55 years old, sleeping behind a nearby Shell gas station.
This is L.A. Homeless, sleeping near the back of the Shell gas station.
He heard explosions and...
In the morning, as he sat against a wall around the corner from the side of the fire, when he peeked out of his makeshift tent made out of plastic trash bags, he saw giant flames flickering out of the overpass.
The heat was so intense, I thought the overpass was going to crumble, he said.
That's what you get when you get a massive amount of hand sanitizer lit up.
You know, when we lived in Houston, Karen and I, in 1983, there was a...
They have these big flyovers.
And you had a cop on a motorcycle pulled over a gas tanker on the curve of a flyover.
Way up in the air and on a dead curve.
They gave him a speeding ticket.
And, you know, somebody came around the corner, didn't see him, and collided, and the tanker exploded, caught fire, killed the police officer, the driver, both drivers, and it literally burned down that concrete and steel overpass because, you know, the heat was so intense and they couldn't get to it.
It's up on this elevated flyover that really put the thing out.
A row of blue tarps, trailers, and wooden shacks sat along 14th Street on Monday among piles of wood from the pallets and the metal debris.
Wooden pallet yards are common along the 10 Freeway in the industrial center near downtown.
And as I said before, Nuisance says that it will take weeks, which means that it's going to be much longer than that before they get the results of this gigantic dumpster fire together.
But take a look at what else is happening in L.A. with the homeless problems that are so big.
Reason Magazine reports that L.A. wants to commandeer vacant hotel rooms as homeless housing.
Well, you obviously see a problem with that, don't you?
LA voters will decide in March whether to force hotels to report empty rooms to the city and to accept vouchers from homeless people.
So, once they have this referendum, they're going to decide.
And it's backed by the hotel union requiring hotels to report their empty rooms to the city's housing department.
And I don't understand why the hotel union wants it.
Because it's going to be their employees who are going to have to deal with a lot of people who've got mental issues.
That's one of the reasons why you see the people on the streets and why they get dangerous.
They are not keeping them committed.
They're not doing anything to help them.
They just put them out on the street.
The idea has its roots in Project Room Key.
A federally funded, state-run initiative during the so-called pandemic that moved the homeless out of the super-spreader congregate shelters and into empty hotels.
Project Roomkey and similar programs in the other states worked smoothly enough because the feds were willing to pick up the tab.
Trump paid for it.
Few business travelers or tourists were looking for rooms anyway, and the hotel participation was voluntary.
But now that people are traveling again for business and pleasure, the hotel owners are less eager to rent rooms and normally operating hotels to the homeless.
And they're not happy about being required to do so by law.
They complain that this would not provide hotels and hotel staff any help in dealing with disruptive homeless guests, that they would be forced to house.
They can turn these hotels into drug dens and, you know, the rest of this stuff.
They said, you know, this union here is fighting to fill all the L.A. area hotels with the same types of activities that you see on Skid Row, and if they succeed, they'll jeopardize the safety of both the hotel guests and the workers of this union.
Virtually destroy the city's tourism industry and cause massive job losses.
Exactly. You want to, you know, rent a room surrounded by homeless drug addicts?
I think I'll go somewhere besides LA. A poll conducted by the Hotel Association found that 86% of people who live in LA believe that the city should not prioritize housing homeless people in hotels.
But, you know, things change. Right now, it looks like they don't have the votes for this.
But when you look at the burden that this has become, that's just one aspect of what is happening in our society as it melts down.
Now, the other part of this is the border crisis, which is where we began the program.
Our new speaker, Mike Johnson, doesn't think it's a big issue.
Well, let's kick it to next year because next year's an election issue.
We can fight over this and tell people, you've got to vote for Republicans so that we can fix this.
We just don't have enough Republicans to fix this, so get more of us in.
And vote for Trump. Make sure you vote for Trump so that we can get the border fixed.
They're not going to fix anything.
Even if they got their way, they're not going to fix anything.
They've had countless opportunities.
You've had situations where Trump was president and he had both Republican House and Republican Congress.
He did nothing about the border.
Nothing about the border.
He repaired some of the wall.
He built 40 miles of something, a new wall.
And the very conviction of Steve Bannon over the fraud challenges because of the organization that he and Brian Colfology were running was, we build the wall.
We build the wall because why?
Because Trump isn't building the wall.
And the Republicans aren't building the wall.
They're not going to build the wall. $451 billion is what the border crisis is costing U.S. taxpayers.
So this is the price tag right now of where we stand on the Cloward and Piven strategy.
The Cloward and Piven strategy, let's bankrupt America.
How do we do that? Well, let's do it with the welfare system.
Well, Americans are not in the welfare system that much.
Okay, let's bring in people from all over the world and put them on the welfare system.
$451 billion.
And that's not really even counting the add-on costs of crimes and encampments and other things like that.
And the encampments, a lot of the encampments that are happening are people who come in, they've got no means of support.
You see this happening in London, right?
It's the immigrants who are coming in that are camping out on the street.
They've got no place to be housed.
Or the Greek island where they had 6,000 people on the island and now 18,000 people have joined them.
Without any permission or approval of the people who live there.
That's what this is truly about.
And again, these people in Congress are more than willing to fight each other over their issues, but they're not willing to fight for us.
We'll be right back. If you like the Eagles, the cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
Download our app or listen now at APSRadio.com.
Unlike most revolutions where the people rise against a real economic oppression, in our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle.
It is, however, not nearly so abstract as a young gentleman supposes.
The issue involved here is one of monopoly.
Hey! Today the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country.
Tomorrow it will be something else.
I love you.
I love you.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
All right, and thank you very much, Geese Busters.
Thank you for the tip. He says, Audi, because Audi, Modern Retro Radio, is matching it.
So thank you so much, Audi.
Appreciate that. He says, Audi, call us for free geese control at Geese Busters.
Yes, he has a wonderful way to get the geese away without having to kill them.
And so, yeah, call for free geese control, geese busters.
And again, Audi is going to be on with Jason Barker.
Or rather, Jason Barker is going to be on with Audi on Modern Retro Radio.
So check that out.
And Angry Tiger, thank you very much for the tip.
Good to see you there as well.
He says, FDIC has a $12 billion shortfall for covering deposits.
So get your money out of these burning buildings.
Dumpster fire, just like the L.A. freeway, under the freeway.
My son wrote, what's going to stop these homeless people from trashing the room?
What are the hotels going to do if they do?
You're required to have them.
It is going to completely trash the whole thing.
So much for the hotel industry in L.A. Yeah, exactly right.
Michael DeSilvio.
Hand sanitizer burned an ancient blimp hanger in Southern California last week.
Wow. Wow. Yeah, they've got so much of the stuff.
Again, when we look at central planning, right?
What we saw throughout the pandemic by Trump and these health dictators and everything was the fact that they don't even know.
You know, they don't know what to buy.
They misallocate resources all the time.
So we've got massive amounts of hand sanitizer probably stored with the masks.
I wonder how the two of them burn together.
Like a bunch of linseed oil rags all over the place.
Napalm sanitizer.
It says hiccup one.
Yeah, exactly right. Brian and Deb McCartney, good to see you there.
My mom works in a homeless shelter here in northern Minnesota.
Most of the residents have a mental health issue and a suitcase of pharmaceutical drugs.
It is a problem.
Yeah, it is. Yeah, the pharmaceutical drugs, the recreational drugs, and the mental issues.
That preceded it and are exacerbated by all that stuff.
And again, we don't ever address any root problems.
What we do is we tell the hotels, well, you're going to have to, you know, shelter these people now.
Bethany and same over here in Washington.
It doesn't help that the state essentially made it illegal to arrest someone for public drug use.
So you have the mentally ill on prescribed drugs and using fentanyl.
Yeah. Welcome to America.
Well, Alex Newman gave an interview.
We talked about this briefly yesterday when I interviewed Seamus Bruner about his new book that got released yesterday, Contrologarchs.
He mentioned it briefly, the 50 in 5 program.
That is their goal.
And five years to have, and as I said, they want to have their, 2030 is the magic date that everything is supposed to be in place, their new society that they want to have in place.
But they've got to get this all, a lot of things have got to happen before then.
They've got to take us down, they've got to have other things put in, other control mechanisms put in.
And so they want to have 50 different nations in five years.
Join up with this globalist agenda for complete digital control.
At Technocracy News, the editor says, a digital prison for humanity, that was encoded in the technocracy course of 1934.
That was when it was in its heyday.
And again, if you think that Elon Musk is on your side, well, you need to look a little bit more at the technocracy.
Don't get fooled by the fact that he's not a depopulationist.
He doesn't want to kill everybody.
He wants to use everybody.
And that is, you know, it's kind of a, you know, in many different ways his differences are distinction without a difference.
But there are some different ways in what he wants to do.
But seven requirements for technocracy, and the editor of Technocracy News says, so here's numbers three, four, and five out of the seven requirements.
Provide a continuous inventory of all production and consumption.
Provide a specific registration of the type, kind, etc., of all goods and services, where they're produced and where they're used.
And number five, provide specific registration of the consumption of each individual, plus a record and a description of the individual.
You see, what this is, is this is the Internet of Things.
Got to have everything inventoried.
Got to know where everything is.
Got to know how everything is being used.
And you are part of the Internet of Things.
People are a part of the Internet of Things.
Makes me think of Soylent Green at the very end.
Wait a minute. Soylent Green is people.
Well, the Internet of Things is people.
Is people. You are their inventory.
You are their slaves. So the UN and Bill Gates, and so Technocracy News, It covers this from a perspective, I'll get into it here in a second, of biometrics.
And what they do is they look at a publication that is a trade publication for the people who are making devices to produce biometrics.
And they're just all gushing about how the future is going to be wonderful and utopian and all the rest of this stuff.
But this is what Alex Newman says about the 50 and 5 scheme.
The UN... And Bill Gates, in this 50 in 5 scheme, want to impose digital public infrastructure.
And by that, they mean digital ID, digital currency, digital wallets.
It's really a plan to end all privacy and liberty worldwide, said Alex Newman, and he's absolutely right.
The UN-led plan involves getting 50 national governments fully on board with digitization and digital public goods in five years.
Well, they get a big head start in Europe because in Europe they, you know, just did their digital wallet and they said, well, now we've got to have something put into it as soon as they got it passed.
Theory, Breton, the guy who's been making trips to Elon Musk and saying you're going to control this and you're going to control that and you see Elon Musk bowing and scraping before him.
Kowtowing to him, just as he kowtows to she, just as he kowtows to anybody to become the world's richest man.
Just think about it.
How did he become the world's richest man?
By doing the bidding of all these different governments.
It is a public-private partnership.
The technocracy and the tyranny.
So, 50 national governments in five years to go completely digital.
And as Klaus Schwab has said, he wants to see a fusion of People's digital and biological identities.
And that is exactly what they're talking about.
When you look at this article I mentioned, it is on Technocracy News, and it is actually, he pulls in articles, this one is from Biometric Update, which is a trade publication for the biometric industry, and And his comment is, he says, DNA is beyond unique for every person.
It reveals all of your genetic predispositions, all of your family connections.
It cannot be altered.
And so it ensures lifelong immutability.
Now, I have a question about that because, you know, we do know that you can alter people's DNA to some degree.
That's one of the central premises of this biometric update.
They said, unlike fingerprints, it cannot be altered.
But I think with these jabs, it can be.
But anyway, other than that, you know, they're always going to portray it in the most positive light for them.
He says this is the holy grail for technocrats because it allows them to get people's DNA and to use it as ID. And he says, this industry report will show you how excited they are about this technology, but don't fall for the hype.
There are not any, there are no beneficial outcomes from this.
It's all bad. And so here's what the trade publication says.
This is the way they couch it. Biometric identification solutions have become firmly established in our everyday lives.
Yeah, that's a problem.
Should never have let that happen.
Whether it's security checks at the airports, which is where they run this stuff through, or facial recognition on smartphones, the next generation is already waiting.
DNA-based processes not only ensure precise identification of individuals, but they also raise data protection to a completely new level.
For citizens, proof of their own identity is key.
Why is it key? Well, for state benefits.
See, that's how they hook you in.
They hook you in with a welfare state.
And that's what Gates did in India with the Adhar system.
Well, you know, go the poor people, and we'll tell them that you're not going to get any state benefits, not going to get any welfare payments, not going to get any health care if you don't take the number of the beast, the government.
So your identity is key.
To state benefits, identification, and mobility.
Well, we got them beat there because you don't have to do that if you're an illegal in the United States.
You come in and you get all those benefits without having to show any ID. You're completely undocumented and unidentified, and you can still get all this stuff.
Anyway, many people around the world still do not have a legal identity that can be verified by a birth certificate or a passport, for example.
And this is where the potential of unalterable and unique DNA comes into play, which can unambiguously identify people in cases of doubt.
So this is their case that they're making for their product.
They have some technology they call rapid DNA technology.
Solutions can generate DNA profiles anywhere within a short period of time using mobile devices and fully automated processes.
These processes do not require any special technical or scientific knowledge, and they ensure lossless data generation.
A DNA ID card created this way offers numerous advantages over conventional biometric ID methods, such as fingerprints or facial recognition.
Or even iris recognition.
Because they said the DNA-based solution ensures lifelong immutability and rules out tampering.
And again, I don't know.
It seems to me like they're tampering with DNA. And planning to tamper with DNA. So, still, we know that people can alter their fingerprints.
I don't know how you alter your iris scan, though.
I can see where you could change your facial shape.
They said this kind of stuff, maybe the iris scans change over the course of a person's lifetime, like their facial shape, or it can be manipulated through surgery, but not the DNA. That can only be manipulated by Pfizer and Moderna.
Enlightenment is a prerequisite, they said.
And so this trade publication says the problem is the general public continues to associate the collection of DNA samples predominantly with their use in the field of criminal law.
No, I think more and more we're starting to understand that the use of biometrics is being used against us by a criminal class who seek to imprison us.
I think that's a problem people are starting to see with all this stuff.
You know, they say, well, you know, use your biometrics to unlock your phone.
No, I don't. You don't have to.
Well, you get your biometric information scanned by the TSA whenever you travel.
Well, I'm not traveling. But they keep shutting down parts of our life.
But it's better to cut that off than it is to go into the hell that they have designed for us.
An important argument here is that DNA identification is far more anonymous.
Oh, is it? And precise than any other biometric methods.
They say this.
What an amazing lie.
An amazing spin.
The whole point of all these ideas is to end any anonymity.
And of course you've got Nikki Haley now jumping on that bandwagon as well.
Pushing war.
Pushing the end of anonymity on the internet and everything else.
And she's richly rewarded for that.
She has Jamie Dimon.
Or Dimon.
Meeting with her, talking about giving her money.
Because she's pushing everything that they want.
The ID technology of tomorrow, they said.
A DNA ID heralds the coming evolutionary step in personal ID and verification.
In the future, citizens and governments will benefit equally from reliable DNA-based personal identification.
Yeah, this is their...
They're marketing plans.
Kind of like the video I showed a long time ago of Ukraine.
Yeah, you know, by 2030, the war in Ukraine will be over.
And look, we'll have government IDs and they'll just, everything will be so simple.
The government, you won't wait in line for anything.
The government will give you your every desire.
You know, this benevolent genie that comes along with your smartphone and your digital ID, the world will be at your fingertips.
And your interaction with government will be so easy.
And as they're showing you all these things, start to realize just how pervasive they see the government being.
In other words, it is omnipresent in every aspect of your life.
Oh, well, look, you know, in this aspect of your life, here's the government, and you've got to prove to the government who you are so that they will give you permission and privileges to do whatever it is that you want.
Oh, well, that's great.
Gee, let's make that a lot easier.
Grant, 7777.
Thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate it.
It says, rah-rah, David. My son says, we want to make a DNA-based identification, but don't worry, it'll be anonymous.
We'll know everything about you, and we'll follow you everywhere that you go and grant you privileges for anything you want to do if we agree with you and if we like you.
But if not, don't worry about it.
Yeah, it'll be anonymous. One of the biggest lies you've ever seen.
That's right up there, along with the fact that the untested vaccine novel way of doing it will be safe and effective.
Hazel Kitty 57, they won't use abandoned hotels to place these people they want to destroy tourism.
Yeah, it's just part of destroying everything.
It really is. And when you look in the Netherlands, what is really sad is that there was just a vote in two more cities to ban all advertising about meat and dairy in public spaces.
Isn't that amazing? These people are signing their own death warrants.
I looked at the farmers who are pushing back against the horrific stuff that's being done against them in the Netherlands.
you know they're going to criminalize uh eating meat and having dairy and we got to shut down the farms because they want the farmers land and so they're criminalized and they don't want you eating this stuff they want you eating whatever it is that bill gates and his cronies have there
and of course the prime minister mark ruda is um heavily involved in the world economic forum as is the the number two person who is also married into the family of the biggest food distribution company there in the Netherlands, Picnic.
And Bill Gates bought into that as well.
And they want you eating their food.
They want you having the food delivered by them.
And they also want all the land because they want to pack everybody into this gigantic city.
I mean, the city that they've got planned for that area in the Netherlands is just unbelievable.
And I'm looking at this and it's like, why are the farmers the only ones who are pushing back against this?
Because it's not just their livelihood.
It's also the food for the people there, as the slogan goes.
You know, no farms, no food.
Well, they're going to come up with Bill Gates' version of Soylent Green or whatever.
You know, eats the bugs and all the rest of the stuff.
But when you look at this, it's not just the apathy of the people in the Netherlands, but it's antipathy to this.
They're against this.
You've had an election and two more cities.
It's now three Dutch cities have voted to ban advertising of meat and dairy products in public spaces.
I'm not going to try to pronounce the names of these other two cities that just voted, but I know how to pronounce Harlem.
The Globetrotters.
But no, it's the original Harlem, which is spelled with two A's.
They did this last year.
They voted to do it last year, and now you've got two more cities that are doing it.
And so three altogether are banning any advertisements for meat or dairy.
Veg Economist is a publication.
Reports of these in these municipalities, they had a majority that was formed by coalition parties that agreed to prohibit meat and dairy advertisement on billboards, posters, and other advertising spots managed by the city.
The ban will also include fossil fuel-dependent products, Such as combustion engine cars and also airline tickets because they want to ban the airline tickets and the cars with engines.
And when you look at this, we know where this is headed.
We had, throughout my lifetime, I've watched as they've gone after tobacco.
I don't really care personally because there's no way that I'm going to smoke.
As I've said before, as my family and my dad struggled with it, I had a cousin who died from it.
And so it was very severe.
There was no way that I was going to be stupid enough to smoke anything.
And just from a personal standpoint, And I hated being on airplanes because, you know, they had the smoking section and the non-smoking section.
Guess what? You know, I'm sitting in the first row of the non-smoking section.
It's ridiculous. If you've got somebody smoking on an airplane, everybody's smoking on an airplane because it would bother me.
But it bothered me that the government would mandate it.
You know, I did a lot of commuting flying when I was working for Texas Instruments in Houston.
They would have people commute and fly up to Dallas and then back to Houston same day.
That's really what made Southwest a going concern.
Doing that type of thing, people doing telecommuting.
Because you didn't have Zoom, you didn't even have, in those ancient days, you didn't even have fax machines.
In a giant facility at Texas Instruments where I worked, they had one fax machine.
And it was this gigantic thing.
Unbelievably expensive.
Unbelievably unreliable.
You had this poor secretary who, that's her sole job, was to try to get stuff sent.
And she was always a nervous wreck.
Because it's always dropping the signals.
It was super slow.
And before it could transmit the document, it would lose the signal and all the rest of the stuff.
So people would physically fly, you know, that short distance there and back.
And the Southwest Airlines, you know, people would say fly the bus because that's what it was like.
Not a good experience.
And so they had another airline that Came up in a competition of them.
It's called Muse Air.
Southwest was known at the time for tacky airline stewardess attire.
It was hot pants and boots and stuff like that.
It was all bright orange interior and cloth seats and heavy smoking and all the rest of the stuff.
Well, Muse Air...
Toned everything down to dark blues and whites, and their stewardesses had business-type suits and dresses below the knee, and they would give you a free Wall Street Journal.
The seats were leather, and there was no smoking.
So everybody was trying to get on that.
I want to be on that plane over there.
But, you know, the market can take its course, right?
You don't need to have the government come in and prohibit smoking.
But they've done that for the longest time, and they, you know, banned the ads for smoking.
But now we're at the point where, in New Zealand, they began it by saying, well, anybody who is born after such and such a date, we're never going to let you smoke.
Not when you get to 18 or 21.
Never, ever. And now you've got King Charles, the man formerly known as Prince, who's saying the same thing in the UK. It's going around.
They know that once they get to a certain level of, you know, propaganda to these young kids, then they can just come in and ban it.
And they're going to do that in a lot of different areas.
And this is just another one of them.
Meat and dairy is going to go the same way.
That's what they're doing to tobacco.
They will demonize it with Greta and these other useful idiots.
And then when the kids that have gone through school and been hectored about how CO2 is going to kill everybody, once they have gone through K-12 and gone through school and then working for a company and all the rest of the stuff, and they just get this constant barrage of propaganda, at some point they're just going to flat out ban it.
But I think it's going to come even faster.
Because it's going to roll out with the rest of the stuff.
But this is, I mention that because this is a, you know, banning the advertising, you know, censorship of that form while they demonize it at the same time.
Don't want anything positive being shown about meat and dairy.
So, you know, none of those posters that got milk with a white mustache or anything.
I guess it'd be got tyranny.
Yeah. Got CO2? Have you got any CO2? Oh, get rid of that CO2. The municipality said they're committed to taking the necessary actions to reduce CO2 emissions.
This is this insanity. We've got to get rid of all the unicorn farts.
We're in this quixotic quest to joust with the windmills.
Not jousting at them, but jousting with them.
Or maybe they're jesting with us.
But... Daily Mock News says people need to get farming homesteading ASAP. Yes.
Don't let Bill Gates take over the farming industry, because that is the point.
If you want to have independence, it is about the Declaration of Independence.
The Americans had everything they needed.
They didn't need anything from Great Britain, right?
They can grow their own food, build their own buildings, and do all the rest of the stuff, and we will not have any freedom if we don't have independence in reality.
In reality. Your political independence and your political liberty is based on your actual independence and whether or not you have the means and the skills to do these things yourself.
The Netherlands has been enacting, it says, Wine Press News, Devilish laws to sequester large swaths of farmers' lands and then to euthanize their livestock.
So we were talking to Seamus Bruner yesterday.
He says, yeah, the plan is we've seen all along.
We've seen this over and over again.
They come up with a...
An approach to, you know, they got a new product and they buy in at the ground floor this new product and then they get the government to ban their competitors and force everybody to buy their new product that they bought at the very beginning.
You know, we just recently had it surfaced that Exxon has got vast lithium holdings that they have been quietly accumulating in the United States.
They just went public about it after having kept it secret for quite a while.
I remember when Rex Tillerson, who had been the CEO of Exxon, was being considered by Trump, rumored to be considered by Trump for his Secretary of State, and he did appoint him.
But I was pushing back against it on Twitter, and, you know...
That was at a point where I wasn't shadow banned.
And I was tweeting at Trump and tweeting at Alex because I knew that he talked to him occasionally.
And got Alex really upset about it because I was criticizing Rex Tillerson.
Oh, don't criticize anything Trump does.
And I said, well, you know that...
He is going to be pushing radical environmentalism, which he did, you know, did not want Trump to get out of the Paris Climate Accord.
And all these people on Twitter were telling me, you're stupid.
Don't you realize that Rex Tillerson was the CEO of Exxon?
It's like, don't you realize the strategy these people do?
They buy into the lithium mines and then they get the government to, I mean, they're not just hedging their bets.
They're buying into this stuff at the very beginning and then getting them to ban the other stuff that is out there.
But for them, they would like to be able to sell oil.
But if you keep it very rare by keeping it in the ground and people only use it for plastic products, imagine what they can charge for it.
They would love to have that kind of a situation.
Bill Gates, buying up land, threatening small farms under the guise of saving the planet.
Again, that's part of Seamus Bruner's book, Control of Garks.
We touched on that just a little bit.
But, you know, that's all just a coincidence.
It's not a conspiracy that he wants to do that and that he wants to go out and cut down all the trees now and bury them in the ground.
Can't even have any wood from the trees that he cuts down.
Matthew Ronson. Well, the government banned advertising tobacco, but legalized advertising pharmaceuticals.
There you go. Yeah.
So, it's who you know, isn't it?
Good Footprints says, I guess they really do think milk is racist.
Gonna kill off the cows, too, because of the farts.
Yeah. High Boost, are they, the Netherlands, really voting for this, or does Dominion handle their elections?
I don't trust elections or polls.
Yeah, I, you know, the only thing is, is that I was just puzzling as to why nobody was really joining with the farmers out there.
You know, it's like they're...
For them, it's everything.
It's the end of their livelihood and their culture, where they have worked on these farms for the longest time.
But the other people are just kind of sitting there on the sidelines.
I don't know. I guess I'll get my food out of a vending machine or something.
I think that's where it comes from, doesn't it?
Biometrics DS2B says contact lenses, I believe, can trick eye scanners.
Well, I guess I have to start wearing some.
Crystal Moonshine, as someone who works in forensics, there's no form of biometrics that is anonymous.
That's right. The whole point of biometrics is to make sure that you are not anonymous.
And the whole point of Nikki Haley is to make sure that there's no anonymity on the internet either.
They want to know everything that you're doing.
Well, the globalist vision of the 15-minute city, says Brandon Smith at altmarket.us.
He says it's really just prison cities.
And the end of private property.
And I liked his article.
He really hit it spot on.
He said, you know, as a general rule, he said, I've noticed that whenever the public starts to scrutinize any particular agenda promoted by the governments and the globalists, their first response is to be indignant about it.
Much like a narcissist would do if they're up to no good and they get caught.
How dare you question my intentions?
How dare you suggest these intentions might be nefarious?
Well, how dare you suggest that anything other than loving and benevolent, our leaders have only ever wanted the best for us, right?
They only want our lives to be more safe, more comfortable, more convenient.
This is what truly motivates them, right?
As you saw in the House and in the Senate yesterday.
Obviously, history tells us a far different story, and it boggles my mind.
When anybody tries to argue that things are different today compared to 100 years ago or 300 years ago or 1,000 years ago, there is nothing new under the sun.
That's right. Nothing new under the sun.
And, of course, Solomon knew that.
It's human nature.
We have different tools.
And the tools make the people with evil human nature gives them more power to wield against other people.
But human nature does not change.
He says, so when that doesn't work, how dare you question me?
I'm a person of the utmost integrity.
Just take a look at the FDIC. And the citizenry remains skeptical.
The tyrants go on the attack, and they accuse everybody of a conspiracy theory.
He says, you know, this has actually been kind of useful.
Because whenever you see the establishment throwing that around as a pejorative term, you know that you're over the target, right?
Start calling you a conspiracy theorist.
But he said, I want to take a look at the end goal of the climate change policies, the ultimate solution, not to save the planet, but to control everybody.
And one of the most important ways that they want to control everybody is with the 15-minute city.
He said one of the most important aspects of the Agenda 2030 for the globalists is a 15-minute city.
Hundreds of city mayors from across the U.S., Europe, and Asia work closely with groups like the World Economic Forum.
And he's talking about the C40 organization.
It was originally 40 cities, big cities.
It was originally New York and London.
It was originally Bloomberg and I think...
I think the mayor at the time was Sadiq Khan.
Sadistic Khan man is what he really is.
And so, you know, it was that London-New York axis there that got it going.
And it was 40 cities.
But now it is up to, last I saw it was like 99 cities or something.
And this C-40 organization...
Has put together a short little video proclaiming what a wonderful idea the 15-minute city is.
Here it is. Before the recent lockdowns around the world, we led haptic lives.
We long commutes and not enough time to spend with our families.
It was awful before the lockdown.
Traffic polluted our air and smoke.
Lockdown made everything so good.
Our skylines.
What if it could be different?
What if we could create a new normal where we reclaim our time, our health and well-being, and our communities?
This is the idea behind the 15-Minute City.
A growing movement to make our lives in cities more convenient, less stressful, and more sustainable.
A 15-minute city is one where everything we need is close to home, where communities are safe and inclusive, where the air is clean.
A 15-minute city is one where it's easy to get goods and services.
Fresh groceries, health care, and other amenities are all just a short trip away.
A 15-minute city is one where everyone has a place.
A 15-minute city has affordable, accessible, and adaptable housing for households of all sizes and ages.
A 15-minute city means that you can work close to home or work remotely more often.
And we all play a role in our neighborhood.
What if we don't go back to life as it was?
What if we already have the power to change how we live?
Together, we can reimagine and create the future we want.
One that is cleaner, safer, healthier, and more inclusive.
And gives us back valuable time to enjoy the little things.
Yeah, C40. See our other solutions at c40.org.
Wow. That's a stack of lies straight out of the pit of hell, isn't it?
Brandon Smith says, you know, a utopian future in which everything you need is only a short walk away and private transportation is superfluous or maybe banned.
It'll be like living in a giant mall.
Won't that be nice? And I guess we'll all be little mall rats, you know, in their laboratory experiment.
And no, no.
He says it's no mistake that this idea was pushed hard during the pandemic lockdowns.
And you just saw there, you know, life was awful before the pandemic lockdowns.
And it got so much better when they put us in jail.
Well, let's just stay there, you know.
And they show the person the finger pushing the exit button, you know.
I want to exit the old normal, and I want to live in the new normal.
I want to live in this utopian mall life.
No mistake, this was pushed hard during the pandemic lockdowns.
Yes. And, you know, this whole idea and the training for it with the lockdown, the training for universal basic income with a stimulus check.
You'll go nowhere. You'll have no job.
You'll have no business. We're going to take your business.
We're going to take your job. Oh, and here's a little bit of a check.
And it was really, you know, a taste of that.
Because it's not enough to live off of.
Remember when they put that out?
Oh, yeah, we'll give everybody, what was it, $1,200 or something like that?
And then Mnuchin was like, you know, after several more months, well, you're going to give another one?
Well, do people really need any more than that?
Said the Goldman Sachs banker and his wife, who had the social media account showing them as the jet setters going everywhere with, you know, and in the Treasury Department with stacks and stacks of cash all around them.
Yeah. Just brag about it.
She was very much...
His movie star wife, Mnuchin's movie star wife, was very much like these kids who are the offspring of these communist dictators in Central and South America.
And they have these social media accounts showing their lifestyle in Europe and all the rest of the stuff.
Anyway, media pundits continue to call the connection between COVID lockdowns and climate lockdowns a conspiracy theory.
But the idea is openly admitted by both the UN and the World Economic Forum's white papers.
And of course, Trump, who was all on board with all this stuff, he's continuing in that vein.
He calls these open-air prisons freedom cities.
There's absolutely no mistake that Trump is doing everything that these people want.
So instead of calling it the WEF, you can call it the WTF. It works in two different ways.
People are like, what are they going to do?
But they also, the World Trump Forum, because that's what he's doing, his false narrative that he's got there.
15-minute cities, not just about convenience or close access.
Brandon Smith says it's about changing every aspect of our current philosophy of living.
It's not about gaining amenities it's about making an array of sacrifices in order to appease the gods of carbon emissions.
A 15-minute city is more like a recipe containing every single ingredient of the climate change and COVID lockdown agendas in a single comprehensive Orwellian vision.
Freedom cities.
It includes removing motor vehicles, removing private transportation and roads.
It's one of the reasons why, you know...
Booty gay, booty marks, if you will.
He gets this massive amount of funding for infrastructure, but instead he's using it to tear down racist roads.
The roads are racist, so they must go.
Well, the roads are not racist, but they don't want you to have roads.
Anything they don't want you to have, they call it racist.
His smart city has an AI monitoring of every person's electricity usage, the monitoring of product consumption, the carbon footprint, and the biometric surveillance within a compact and stacked urban landscape.
The cashless society concept, equity, inclusion, cultism, population control, all these different things.
And you look at it, he's right.
Every single aspect of the Orwellian lockdowns and climate change desires and deprivations that they want, that C40 wants, every bit of it, It is a part of the 15-minute city.
It is the culmination, the endgame, a massive prison with no bars.
So Trump calls it the Freedom City.
Because Trump can say that up is down, that left is right, That, you know, black is white and white is black, and everybody will listen to what he has to say.
So you call a 15-minute city a freedom city.
Within these cities, you are a labor mechanism and nothing more.
You will never be allowed to own your own property, and thus, you will not be allowed to own your own labor.
Everything you have is given to you by the state, can be taken away from you by the state if you defy them.
It might be able to leave the village or the community that you're tied to for a little time, but this will change with increasing restrictions on movement.
According to the dictates of the climate ideology.
And of course, this is what people like Solzhenitsyn always experienced in communism, because that's what this is.
It is communism with high-tech tools to enforce it.
In the case of a technocratic feudal system, you would not have any guarantee that the state would need your services, at least in the feudal systems that we had in European history, a peasant system.
It was seen as a valuable resource because of a limited population.
But now, this is going to be a world where they say, well, we've got too many people.
We don't need you. And so, you know, what we need is some soil and grain.
In 2016, the World Economic Forum put up their Welcome to 2030, I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better.
And they have worked so hard to try to cover that up.
It's been memory-holed everywhere.
He says, even Forbes appears to have erased their published copy, for example.
It was everywhere, and now you can find that nowhere.
One of the reasons you can find it nowhere is because they kept bragging about the sharing economy.
You will know nothing because everything will be shared.
And he goes, well, like all communist systems, the big lie is that you'll work less, everything will be free, He says this is how they always sell it to the population for generations.
It never works that way.
You are poor because these people have made you poor.
You're going to get even with them, and I'm going to take everything they've got, and I'm going to give it to you.
Instead, what they do is they take everything they've got, and they keep it for themselves because they're just another class of exploiters.
It's just class warfare between two different Games of Thrones groups.
And that's what our elections are really about as well.
And so he says, if you look at the article, and it talks about, my biggest concern is for all the people who don't live in our city, they said.
Those are the people that we lost on the way.
Those who decided that it became too much with all this technology.
Those who felt obsolete and useless when the robots and AI took over big parts of our jobs.
Those who got upset with the political system and turned against it.
They lived different kinds of lives outside the city.
Some have formed little self-supplying communities.
Others just stayed in the empty and abandoned houses and small 19th century villages.
You know, in other words, like homeless encampments in LA, except it'll be a lot nicer if you know how to do things.
Your independence is going to be based on your ability to survive independently in the future.
So start working on those skills.
You don't have to be caught up We're good to go.
Once in a while, said the World Economic Forum, when talking about when you'll own nothing and enjoy everything so much more, once in a while I get annoyed about the fact that I have no real privacy.
Nowhere I can go and not be registered.
I know that somewhere, everything I do, everything I think and dream of, is recorded.
I just hope that nobody will use it against me.
What an amazing admission by the World Economic Forum.
Even they see the darkness in this.
They're erroneously billed as decentralized communities, and yet they are the most utterly centralized things that people have ever come up with.
The core philosophy behind them is dependency.
So, learn skills.
Everything these people do is designed to make you dependent.
That's what the welfare is about. That's what public transportation was about.
They're not there to help you.
They're there to make you dependent, to turn you into a pet.
So... You need to learn the skills to be independent of this complex infrastructure, which as we see, you know, multiple times just in Australia last week or so.
Ports shut down with cyber attacks.
You had the telecommunications thing shut down so people couldn't process payments or buy anything.
And that may be the way they're going to come after people.
You know, it's always coming after the payment processing system.
In the same way that when they shut down all of the airports across the United States, what did they do?
They came after the NOTAM system, which is not about payments, but it was this little ancillary thing that put out messages about whether or not there was some issue at an airport or that somebody was stuck on the runway or something like that.
And so without that... They said, well, that's not safe.
So they shut everything down.
So once you shut down that NOTAM system, then the FAA would shut down all the airports.
Did it here for about 12 hours or so.
And then as soon as it came back up here, the same MO, same thing happened in Canada.
Shut down very quickly.
All this is going to be sold to us and is sold to us as convenience and as safety.
Just understand that all of this appeal to convenience and to safety is really just a siren song and it's going to lead you straight into the rocks.
And so don't listen to all this stuff.
Safety is fine, but it's not the highest goal of everything in life that they like to make it.
YJ72, thank you very much.
I appreciate that for the tip.
As I'm watching the show, my husband mentioned that Bill Gates, let me put down his kill gates, now owns Bragg's apple cider vinegar.
Nothing to see, right? Yeah, he's buying up all the food stuff.
He knows that is where the control really is.
He's a control-agarch.
These guys, he doesn't need any more money.
He's got more money than he could ever spend in his lifetime.
He's about 70 years old.
But it's about the power.
You may think he's going to live forever, as a lot of these technocrats do.
KWD-68, moving the cities from the land, took people into the slavery of money and bosses.
A heaping helping of leaving God and here we are.
That's right. You know, when you look at, a lot of people would say, especially the Industrial Revolution, you look at the conditions in the factories.
They were awful. You know, people had it difficult everywhere.
It was difficult working agricultural jobs.
It was difficult working in the fields and all the rest of the stuff.
A lot of people said, you know, I came out of this from being a slave in the fields, and now I'm a slave in the factory.
And in the factory, they don't take any responsibility for anything.
You know, you get the money, but you don't have any place to live.
They don't feed you, any of that kind of stuff.
So, again, it was a different kind of slavery.
Yeah. And everybody got to participate in it.
But that was, you know, the Industrial Revolution and what was happening in the factories was difficult enough that it gave rise to communism and socialism and all the rest of the stuff.
It was a really bad aspect to that system as well.
And that's what these people are looking at with their fourth Industrial Revolution.
They just want to imprison us until we die out, you know, as a people.
I'm Marty says, historic 15-minute cities include the Warsaw Ghetto and the Gaza City.
Yeah, that's right. Yeah.
Yeah, just seal people off.
You know, shut the walls. A walled-in city.
Syrian girl, it's appropriate that they have fairytale music in the background while childlike voices do the narration.
Jim Z7, 15-minute cities, nursing homes for every age.
Risha M. Gaza was used as a 15-minute city.
Israel used biometrics to identify every single Palestinian in there.
Exactly right. Yeah, very high-tech.
Maloney, a Trumper said to me that freedom cities are better because you will be the owner of I said, own your own enslavement, and he got mad at me.
Yeah, that's the Trump derangement syndrome, all right.
Every Trump city will come with a casino and a McDonald's.
With a McDonald's, it'll cost you, like, what is it costing now in the city?
Like, 18 bucks for a Big Mac meal?
And, of course, Trump's casino's been bankrupt even then.
Matthew Ronson, Trump's greet-em cities, yeah.
Hazel Kitty. We're already enslaved.
We have been for a while.
We're not the true owners of land.
We are the leash holders.
Yeah. Yeah, you rent with the property taxes from them.
I knew Trump was not our guy, says Risham, when he started with the track and trace crap in his speeches.
People were stupid enough to think that it would only be for illegals.
That's right. So...
Big Macs, don't those have beef?
No, I don't think they do. I don't know what that is in there.
I don't know if that's beef or if it's something else.
We're going to take a quick break. We'll be right back.
Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
From country to blues, classic hits to news, APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
Get details at APSradio.com.
Thank you.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
you The Kid Part 2 says Trump will build a big, beautiful wall around the free cities and he'll make Mexico pay for it.
Yeah, he'll make you pay for it, more likely.
But let's take a look at free speech issues.
Because, you know, when you look at a war, and we've got the war going on now between Israel and Hamas, and free speech is one of the things that gets affected by that, both internally in Israel as well as what is happening in our universities.
And it's kind of interesting to see how people are lining up on this issue.
You've got Jewish-Israeli students at MIT are being blockaded from attending classes.
And, you know, this has been going on for a very long time.
I remember when I was in engineering, I looked at MIT, but it was like, even 50 years ago, they were all about You know, your identity politics.
It's like, well, first of all, I'm not going to, regardless of any grades or anything else, I'm going to be excluded because I'm white.
And do I really want to fight to get into a place like that?
I don't want to go to a university like that anyway.
And so I was going to go to Georgia Tech for graduate school, but we got married instead.
Best decision I ever made, I think.
Mary and Karen. Not necessarily not going to Georgia Tech, but, you know, Mary and Karen.
But anyway, you know, you get it.
They've been excluding people because they're white all my life from universities.
But now that they're blockading Jewish kids from going to classes, now it's an issue.
It's like, why is that?
I understand. That's wrong. It's wrong.
But it's also wrong to keep white kids from even going to the university, even getting admitted to the university.
And yet, that's not the way that this is the reaction that is happening.
It's amazing to see Jonathan Greenblatt of the Defamation League, the ADL, That is out there whining about now there is an oppression Olympics.
And he says Jews are at the bottom.
It's like, no. No, white people are at the bottom.
And you've put them there, green-black.
That your entire career has been based on the demonization and hatred of white people.
And now you're getting a taste of your own medicine.
When I look at this, it reminds me of Robosphere, who kicked off the French Revolution, and they're cutting people's heads off.
And eventually, he got put in the guillotine.
And I think that's basically Jonathan Greenblatt is getting some of this well-deserved treatment.
You know, he's getting hoisted by his own petard, quite frankly.
He says you're going to lose tens of millions of donor dollars, and you will or you will lose hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding because you will lose Title VI, and you will because we're coming for you.
We're going to sue you. And so, his lawsuits and threats of lawsuits and other things, and the wealthy Jewish donors who are pulling their money out, everything's been solved now.
You know, they don't like the DEI when it's applied to them.
But, you know, it's kind of like Pastor Martin Niemuller who said, well, first they came for the white people, and I didn't do anything about it because I wasn't white.
And then they came for the Jews, and what we did was we pulled their funding, and the problem's been solved, right?
That's basically what's going on with Greenblatt and the rest of these people here.
Columbia University, on Friday, suspended two pro-Palestinian groups.
They've gotten the message. You know, money worked.
Two pro-Palestinian groups as official student groups through the end of the fall term.
However, at the university, it is still not okay to be white.
And I mention that because that was a campaign that was back in 2017.
You know, we had some people as a joke on 4chan said, watch these people freak out.
Just put up a sign that says, it's okay to be white.
And that was six years ago.
Because they knew that the leftists at the university, many people like the ADL, would say it's not okay to be white.
They'd freak out. And they did.
And the ADL joined in, and you can still see the articles on their website, attacking the people who put up signs that said it's okay to be white.
They called them KKK, racist, you know, all the names, all the usual stereotypes that Jonathan Greenblatt and the ADL can think of.
They labeled it white people, because it's not okay to be white.
But it's going to be okay to be Jewish now, because they're going to pull the purse strings and make it okay to be Jewish.
I'm fed up with this double standard, quite frankly.
I've been watching this for a long time, and these people will stop at that, but they will still come after the white people.
Greenblatt and the rest of them, racist, racist, racist, everywhere they see racist, they're projecting their racism, their hatred.
It is a tactic that Greenblatt and the ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center have used to make themselves rich and powerful.
And in that, they're partnering with the government in the same way that the technocrats partner with the government to enslave us in these smart cities and the rest of this stuff.
It is a public-private partnership for hatred.
They run it through the universities, and all of a sudden, it blew back on them for a short period of time.
And so they're going to pull the purse strings and get it back in line.
In addition to Columbia's action, two other Ivy League schools, University of Harvard, or Harvard University and University of Pennsylvania, took more direct action.
I didn't know University of Pennsylvania was considered to be Ivy League, I guess, because they've, I don't know, University of Pittsburgh, I think, was the one that was doing the humanized mice experiments.
But anyway, Washington Post says Israel's free speech cracked down war inside of a war.
This is the Washington Post decrying the politicized persecution of people who criticize the government inside of Israel.
So the Washington Post has also done that about the January the 6th protesters, haven't they?
Oh, no, that's right, they didn't complain about the politicized persecution of people on January 6th.
What's happening in Israel to people who cheered along and said, okay, I'm going to make a special meal for Victory Day or something, celebrating the Hamas terrorist attacks.
A lot of these are just students who are young and stupid and saying things that are inflammatory.
But they're locking them up.
And they're torturing them in prison.
And they're doing all the stuff that our government did to January the 6th people.
According to one center, a rights group in Haifa, Israel, at least 350 Palestinian Israelis have been called to hearings at their workplace, and 120 university students are in disciplinary hearings.
Meanwhile, ad hoc groups of civilians troll through social media posts and flag them to the police.
Sounds just like January 6th stuff to me, doesn't it?
You get ostracized, you get fired, you get arrested.
You get thrown in prison. When you're thrown in prison, these people are being tortured.
And then you've got these groups that go through social media.
Like I pointed out, you know, the so-called manhunt that we had last week.
You know, almost three years after the fact.
You've got these groups going through pictures and doing the kind of sleuthing and detective work that 4chan does.
It is pretty effective when you get a group of people on the internet doing a collective search for someone.
It's kind of like when Shia LaBeouf Did his Trump protests and everything.
And people started trolling him back.
And so then he tried to hide places where they couldn't find him.
And it truly is amazing when you look at the series of detective work that was done for these people to find him on 4chan.
He's in a room that's basically a white wall with no windows or anything like that.
They were able, by listening to sounds and Other things like that and other little tiny clues as everybody's talking about.
They were able to find out where this guy was.
Truly amazing what you can do.
But that's being used against people for January 6th.
It's being used against people or critics of the Israeli government and the way they're handling this.
So defense lawyers and human rights advocates describe the movies as a McCarthy-style clampdown focused on the 20% of the Israeli population that has a Palestinian heritage.
And the current climate, posting anything that does not sit staunchly with the Israeli state's framing of the war, can lead to your arrest.
I guess if you were to put up a sign that says it's okay to be Palestinian, they would take that down as well.
But here in the U.S., You have Representative Mike Lawler, a Republican from New York, says anti-Semitism on college campuses is not a free speech issue.
But being anti-white, that's okay.
Just don't be anti-Jewish on campuses.
Or now we're going to make that a crime.
But they can still go back to all their, you know, take out their frustrations on white people.
They can kick white people as much as they want.
That's fine. Absolutely fine.
And so Lawler and Max Miller, a Republican from Ohio, and Josh Gottheimer, Democrat in New Jersey, Jared Moskowitz, Democrat in Florida, they said that anti-Semitic speech is hate speech.
We've seen a rapid rise in anti-Semitism on these college campuses, and we'll have zero tolerance of that criticism.
But, you know, for the longest time, College has been one big struggle session against white people, and you can't just be non-racist.
You have to be anti-racist, which means that you have to be anti-white.
And that's going to continue.
That kind of hate speech is just perfectly fine with these Republicans and Democrats.
The vocabulary is extremely contested here, said one professor at the American University, Laura Schwartz.
She told the Hill, she said, what constitutes anti-Semitism and what is a critique of Israel as a country and a government are two separate things.
It's a contested area.
But what these people are doing is they're equating any criticism of the Israeli government with anti-Semitism.
And, of course, they don't care about the Marxist moves that have been part of the university.
My son says, Lawler says, it's not free speech if you have wrong opinions.
Free speech is only for agreeing with the government.
That's right. That's right.
And I have a big problem with any hate speech legislation.
I know there's very hateful speech out there, but, again, if you support free speech, You have to support the speech that you hate.
And so when you see Republicans and Democrats out there pulling for this stuff, understand that it will eventually be used to shut down any criticism of the government.
That's what this is ultimately for.
All censorship eventually folds back into totalitarian measures.
And so when you see these measures that are being done by Ron DeSantis in Florida, making it a crime punishable by imprisonment, you know, I don't agree with that.
I have a big issue with that.
And so the ADL says that if you are against the Israeli government or against Zionism in general, that's anti-Semitic.
But other Jewish groups advocate for it, politically.
Again, you know, they are not monolithic in their...
The Jewish people are not monolithic in the way they view their government, just as we are not.
And so Netanyahu has been called unfit to lead by his own people.
But if you criticize Netanyahu, you're anti-Semitic, you understand, right?
So, because you're criticizing a foreign leader, you are racist.
Because the ADO makes the rules.
And Netanyahu was forced to apologize after he got his war cabinet, very angry with him.
You know, they came up and they did a mea culpa, which, of course, you're going to say, well, we failed, right?
Obviously, we failed.
And what he did was he said, that's right, you failed.
I didn't. Just like Trump.
Just like Trump, this guy.
And so they are not very happy with him because he basically threw them under the bus.
Howard Stouffer, an international affairs expert who spent 25 years working for the U.S. government, said this is just another example that Netanyahu is unfit to lead Israel during the war with Hamas.
He told the Daily Express in the U.S., He got elected by 0.2% of the population of Israel in 1996.
He's been a disaster from that point ever since.
I think he is erratic.
He's unfit to be leading Israel through this tremendous time of challenge.
There's a lot of bad things with his leadership.
He accused the intelligence services of failure, but he didn't take any responsibility himself and apparently caused a lot of anger inside the war cabinet.
And then he withdrew that charge about nine hours later.
This is a man who will not take responsibility for anything.
I know somebody like that in our country.
Donald Trump. And Fauci.
Fauci doesn't want to take any responsibility even for any of this stuff.
Trump gave him a medal for what he did, but none of them want to take any responsibility.
And when you look at this, this is just what governments generally do.
Take a look at Russia, for example.
Ordinary Russians are feeling the wrath of Of Putin's repression.
This is from the Wall Street Journal, so they're going to criticize Putin for doing exactly what the Biden administration does to its critics as well.
See, America used to be different.
It's not anymore. Not anymore.
Not after Biden and Trump.
So, prominent opposition politicians, human rights activists, and journalists have been jailed for lengthy terms, slapped with big fines, or forced to flee the country.
In Putin's Russia and in Biden's America, January the 6th.
Much of the crackdown on dissent has been directed against ordinary Russians who constitute the majority of more than 20,000 people who have been arbitrarily detained since the start of the war in early 22.
See, here, Biden's got about 1,000 people for January the 6th.
There, it's 20,000 people.
It's just difference in degree, however.
It's not a difference in the substance of this or in the principles involved.
And that's what we need to understand.
One guy, his name is Artyom Belsky.
He stood alone in front of the Kazan Cathedral in St.
Petersburg for about 30 minutes, holding an anti-war sign.
Several passerbys stopped to shake his hand or to give him a hug, but soon the police arrived.
They detained him and they charged him with an administrative offense for discrediting the Russian military.
They warned that he would be put in prison if he repeated this.
In August, the police had briefly detained him after he hoisted a poster in the same location that read, Russia is tired of corruption, repression, and propaganda.
Stop being silent about it.
At that time, he was fined what's equivalent to about $44.
We're violating COVID restrictions because Russia still bans protests on the pretext that mass gatherings are a health hazard.
How convenient. Same thing that the Chinese did in Hong Kong.
Oh, you can't protest the government because of COVID. Same thing in Russia.
And of course, in the 2020 elections, we had Trump shut down the conventions, and the Democrats shut down the conventions, and they didn't have rallies, and they had vote-by-mail elections, because of COVID. Of course, that's what they...
But now we don't have COVID, and they're not even pretending anymore.
And we still have all those things.
They can meet for rallies and everything.
We still have the mail-in election and the mail-out ballots to everybody.
In Russia, people are imprisoned for simply wanting peace, he said.
I don't think it's a crime to want peace.
But the government does.
And you know, if you want to be pro-life about protecting babies in the UK, they will arrest you for silently praying.
Because they have their gods and they are fiercely worshipped.
A new law in Australia is about to kill free speech and democracy.
The Australian government has recently introduced in Parliament a new law proposal to ban officially unapproved online content.
Officially unapproved.
That's government totalitarianism in a nutshell.
It's officially unapproved speech.
Censored speech based on broad, vague, far-reaching directives.
So, things like hatred against a group in an Australian society on the basis of their ethnicity, nationality, race, gender, sexual orientation, age, religion, or physical or mental disability, except for white people, I imagine.
You know, that's probably a writer there as well.
But the rest of the things are a disruption to public order, a harm to the integrity of the democratic process.
Wait a minute. Isn't censorship a harm to the integrity of the democratic process?
We've got to destroy democracy to save it.
Any speech that you have that might harm the health of Australians?
Any speech that you might have that would harm the Australian environment?
Anything that would cause economic or financial harm to Australians?
To the Australian economy?
Or to a sector of the Australian economy?
That's an interesting one.
I mean, we have now become so unfortunately accustomed to Censoring people because of their political speech?
Censoring people because of all the medical prohibitions of what you can say now?
That has been drilled into us for the last year, and we hardly are surprised to see that somebody's going to be censored or punished for what they have to say about medicine or about the environment.
You evil climate deniers, you're going to get us all killed.
But this is something that you don't typically see enumerated.
And that is anything that you say that they disagree with economically.
So in other words, if you were to criticize, I guess, Keynesian economics because you're an Austrian economist, oh, well, you can't say that.
You know, one of the first things I think it's going to be about, I think that has to do not with general economic philosophy of Keynesianism versus the other things.
I think it's going to be about criticizing their CBDC. Yeah, you can't criticize Big Pharma, says my son, since that's such a big part of the economy.
It is here. Maybe there as well.
But, you know, the first thing of mine that was ever censored was in 2013.
As a matter of fact, it was the first thing that was ever censored of Infowars.
And that was my report on the creation of the Federal Reserve.
Now, they used the excuse that it was a copyright violation.
Because I took a couple of clips from It's a Wonderful Life.
I call the thing It's a Wonderful Lie.
Made, you know, analogies of comparing J.P. Morgan, what he did to create the Federal Reserve in an unhanded way at Christmas time and all the rest of this stuff and talking about the bankers and everything.
But there was a lot of commentary in there.
And that commentary would mean that even if it was copyrighted, that that is fair use.
You see people doing that all the time, or even to today, you know, on YouTube.
People put up clips of movies, and they comment about the quality of the movie, or they comment about other things about the movie, their point of view, their worldview, other things like that.
When you put that up, that is protected by fair use, and it was a small part of the movie.
I mean, it was all done in the context of It's a Wonderful Life, but it was really about the broader creation of the Federal Reserve.
But here's the key. Where did I get those clips?
I got the clips from the full movie that had no political commentary with it whatsoever.
The full movie that had been up for, was it eight years or something, on YouTube and had a million views.
And they use that as an excuse to take it down because you're not allowed to criticize the Federal Reserve.
I think this is going to be, when you look at this, anything that's going to cause economic or financial harm to Australians, I think that is about the rollout.
Of CBDC. They're preemptively putting that in.
But of course, it's going to be about all the rest of their MacGuffins and things you're not allowed to talk about.
Pandemic MacGuffin, the climate MacGuffin, you know, and just censor you because if we don't censor your speech, that could be a harm to the democratic process.
If we don't censor speech, it's compelled.
We must do it to protect democracy.
Ultimately, any type of speech with which the government is uncomfortable with will be deemed to be harmful.
Says RT, and they're actually right.
Describing disrupting social order, quote-unquote, as a serious harm could be interpreted to stop the organization of legitimate political protests.
This could certainly be used to suppress legitimate political speech that should be a part of a functioning democracy.
Now, what I find interesting is that this is absolutely true.
And this is coming from RT. I just read before this article what Putin is doing to people who oppose his war.
And I've always said, you know, RT will tell you the truth about your country.
They'll lie to you about what's going on in Russia.
But they'll tell you the truth about what's going on in Australia or the U.S. or the U.K. or something like that.
But they'll lie to you about what's going on in Russia.
They're not going to cover the censorship in Russia, but they will here.
Harps, the bill has been suspended for now, David.
Good, good, because it is really horrific.
They'd have fines.
Listen, the fines in it, $358,000 for an individual, for a corporation, $1.8 million.
But here's the thing, Harps, even though they have suspended this, you've got to be, as an Australian or as anybody, we see this type of stuff coming in.
Think about the fact that this could even be put together.
And that this would come up for consideration.
What is it? Can you, all of you, think about this.
In America, Australia, Canada, UK, Europe, whatever.
Can you imagine something like this even being proposed a decade or so ago?
No. Look at how far we've gone.
That this kind of stuff can even be put up there.
That's what's so disturbing about it.
As I said before, the left is no longer trying to even hide their totalitarian inclinations.
They're openly putting it out.
Now, hopefully, the bill has now been suspended, so hopefully it is going to be defeated.
But you've got people there who are openly proposing this.
Openly proposing totalitarianism.
They don't really care. That's what I've said.
The conservatives, the Republicans or whatever of my childhood have become leftist socialists or whatever.
They've become the Democrats of my childhood.
And the leftist socialists have become full-on Marxists.
Full-on Marxists.
Totalitarians. So, again, out of all this, you know, they exempt themselves.
So the government can say anything it wants, even if it is a lie, even if it is harmful, but you can't say that.
So it's disturbing that a bill like this could even be introduced.
It truly is. Let's see.
Australian guns were given up.
They've done as anything on the Barbie.
They're as done as anything on the Barbie.
Yeah, they're cooked. Hal9000, banning the internet will be just as easy as banning drugs.
Yeah, maybe even easier.
HazelKitty57, always said, look to Gaza if you want to see our future.
Mm-hmm. About racism, Jason Barker says, once our idea is DNA-based, we will have an accurate model of how badly to treat people.
Yeah, you know, it's interesting, they're saying, that was one of the arguments that this biometric company said, they said, well, you know, with your...
I have your DNA, but that will hide your race.
Unlike, you know, if we take a picture of your face, we'll be able to know what quote-unquote race you are.
Again, I like what Ken Ham had to say.
He said, there's only two races.
The question is which direction you're racing.
We've got people who are racing to God and people who are running away from God, racing away from Him.
And so that's the real issue.
That's the distinction that's made By God.
But he says that we've made all nations of one blood.
Well, if they look at the DNA, I imagine there's going to be a way they'll be able to figure out people's skin color, their ethnicity, and the rest of this stuff.
But I also want to talk about something else that's come out of Israel, and that is this report that's now been pretty much, it's been verified, that you had reporters who worked for the Associated Press and CNN and New York Times and Reuters that were contract personnel, but they did work for them all the time.
And these people were actually embedded with Hamas during the massacre on October the 7th.
Honest reporting put this through and they asked a lot of questions about this.
So what were they doing there so early that would have been, you know, ordinarily been a very quiet Saturday morning?
The same type of questions we ask, you know, when they do a perp walk of one of their political enemies here in the United States.
And all of a sudden, you know, they show up early in the morning and all the press is there.
Well, of course, they called them and brought them in.
You know, it's kind of like, you know, the initial raid on the Branch-Devinian compound.
The ATF had all the...
One of the reasons why it's all filmed is because they had all these film crews there.
It was a photo op.
It was going to be a perp walk and all the rest of this stuff.
And the code to kick it all off was showtime.
And so, you know, what were these people, though, doing there on that early Saturday morning, October the 7th?
Why were they there? Was this coordinated with Hamas, of course?
Did the respectable wire services like Reuters and AP and CNN and New York Times, did they publish the photos?
Did they approve of their presence inside enemy territory together with the terrorist infiltrators?
Did the photojournalists who freelance for other media like CNN and the New York Times, did they notify these outlets?
Judging from the pictures of the lynching and the kidnapping and the storming of the Israeli kibbutz, it seems like the border has been breached not only physically but also journalistically.
And so, of course, they did have some advance notification of that.
And there's a couple of things that come up when I look at this.
I remember when I was in college watching a debate at the School of Journalism at Columbia University, Columbia School of Journalism.
And they had several government officials there, and they had several, you know, high-ranking people in journalism in this debate on either side.
And they asked them a hypothetical situation.
And they asked these journalists, they said, you are a reporter and you are embedded with a Viet Cong in Vietnam.
Because this is, I was in college, this is right after Vietnam had ended.
And so you're there with Viet Cong, and you're traveling with them, seeing what life is like, and you're writing this report and everything.
And so you're there with them, and you see an American organization coming in, and it's a trap.
They're walking into a trap, and they're going to be slaughtered.
Do you try to warn them?
Or do anything like that.
And to a man, every person on every journalist that was there, these high-ranking journalists, you know, the big, impressive media companies, every single one of them said, no, no.
I'm above all that.
I'm, you know, I'm an independent.
I'm a journalist. I'm independent of this war.
I don't have anything to do with that. I would not notify the Americans that they're about to be ambushed.
And I was just amazed.
And so was Arthur Schlesinger.
I remember, you know, Arthur Schlesinger is this fighting whitey type of guy.
You know, when they did the mascot, the Indians said, well, how would you like to be a mascot?
Well, we'll do a fighting whitey.
And so we'll have this archetypical 1950s guy with his pipe, you know, hanging out.
And that's the way Arthur Schlesinger was.
Arthur Schlesinger was just, I've never seen him so distraught.
I mean, he was tied up in knots.
And I agreed with him. I agreed with them.
So what is it with these people?
What is it with Associated Press and Reuters and CNN and New York Times that people would hang out with a terrorist attack and they would be complicit with it?
So that's the first thing I'd look at.
The second thing I'd look at in this is like, it seems like everybody knew that this was going to be happening except for Benjamin Netanyahu.
I mean, seriously. You know, he's using this for his own purposes.
And it was despicable, but it raises questions how many people knew in advance.
So Reuters and AP reporters and all that, they all know about this stuff, but Mossad doesn't know about it?
Netanyahu doesn't know about it?
Or was it their Pearl Harbor?
But they did. And even as they know about all this stuff, you've got the leaders of Hamas saying to the New York Times, well, we've got no interest in helping the Palestinians because we want a permanent war against Israel.
And of course, Netanyahu and company are all about, well, we want a permanent war with Gaza as well.
They don't really care about the civilians on either side.
Neither side cares about their own people.
They're more than willing to kill them, to trample them in their Game of Thrones, and they don't care a bit about them.
And we shouldn't care about their wars and their agendas either.
They are not on our side.
They are not our defenders.
Netanyahu says, I want to be the defender of Israel.
And yet he was the injector of Israel.
He injected poison. We've got all these leaders who want to push us into war.
Every single one of them has been demanding to inject us with poison and to destroy our life if we don't get injected with poison.
Don't follow any of these people into war.
They want to kill us all for their political purposes, whatever those purposes are.
That's the one common thing.
We all have to die.
Audi, Modern Retro Radio.
Thank you so much for honoring my $100 match now, in case I forget.
Thank you so much. Thank you so much.
ModernRetroRadio.com And don't forget, Jason Barker is going to be on his program, on Audi's program.
Thank you so much for the support, Audi.
I really do appreciate that.
Thank you. Jason Barker says, will the DNA indicate markers that indicate if a person has had the MRNS jab?
MRNA, I think. Yeah, yeah.
It probably will.
You'll probably be able to look at those little modifications to your DNA, and they might even be able to tell how many times you've had it.
Who knows? It is truly crazy what these people are doing.
But, of course, there's not going to be any end to it.
And I'll say one more thing about this.
While the Hamas leaders are holding court, they're talking to the New York Times.
So the New York Times, Reuters, AP, they've got people that are embedded with the terrorists on October 7th and everything.
And, of course, they're able to interview the leaders, but we can't get these leaders.
Instead, we're going to bomb the civilian population while the leadership of Hamas sits there in their luxury properties in Qatar and runs their vast financial empire.
We're not going to go after the head of the snake.
We're going to go after the innocent bystanders because that's the way it works for both Israel and for America.
We're not going to go after the guy.
We'll do interviews with him, just like we did interviews with the terrorists as they were doing what they did.
Thanks for listening. The Common Man.
They created common core to dumb down our children.
They created common past to track and control us.
Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
And the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially please keep us in your prayers.
If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
▲
Export Selection