Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 14, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:02:18

The David Knight Show - 11/14/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Using free speech to free minds.
	Soon.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday the 14th of November, year of our Lord 2023.
	23.
	Well, today we're going to be talking a lot about the oligarchs.
	Or, as the author we're going to be talking to today calls them the Controllagarchs.
	Seamus Bruner is going to be joining us today.
	The subtitle of the book is Secret Deals and the Globalist Plot to Dominate Your Life.
	And, of course, it is everywhere.
	We see it everywhere in the news.
	From energy to food to health care and data mining and control.
	Gates and the rest of these people.
	You've also got now...
	Peter Thiel and Palantir getting into the NHS, the largest medical database in the world.
	Well, what is he going to do with that?
	What, for that matter, are any of these people going to do with it?
	So he's going to be our guest in the third hour.
	We're going to begin, however, by talking about the albatross.
	The albatross in the room.
	We'll be right back.
	... So in the aftermath of these setbacks in various states where the Republicans lost everywhere on every issue,
	especially on abortion, except in Mississippi where there really isn't any Democrat opposition at all, people are casting around as to whose fault it is.
	I believe that it is Trump's fault, but they have cast dispersions on Ronald McDaniels.
	You've got people, even non-Trump supporters, like Ann Coulter, saying, the problem is abortion.
	So just kill those babies so he can win.
	Is that where we want to be?
	And you've got a lot of the MAGA people saying this as well.
	Don't blame Trump.
	It's the abortion issue.
	You guys finally won, just like Trump.
	They parrot whatever Trump says.
	And so now it's our fault because we finally got what we asked for.
	We finally got them to stop killing babies in some places.
	And the public doesn't want that.
	I think it's a good example.
	We'll talk about this more later.
	It's a good example of how you can't legislate morality.
	Right? And we've always heard that from the left.
	I've always said it as well.
	Out of the heart come these actions.
	And unfortunately, America's got a very dark heart.
	And I think we need to work on that rather than on the politicians.
	But, you know, Trump is...
	I talked last week when he went on with the two guys who tried to take Rush Limbaugh's place, Clay Travis and Buck Sexton.
	They've got nothing to say.
	It's amazing. But they can get a big guest like Trump to come on because they'll treat him with kid gloves.
	And so as they were talking to him, he starts bragging about how many views his interview with Tucker got.
	Problem is, that was on Twitter.
	As you see this morning, Truth Social has put out its SEC report.
	I haven't fired anybody yet.
	They will be fired, though. And it looks like they're circling the drain.
	Not going to be around too much longer.
	In their first year, 2022, they lost $50 million, and they had $1.4 million in sales.
	I mean, this is like a small business.
	This is like a mom and pop business.
	$1.4 million.
	And, yeah, they lost $50 million and took in $1.4 million.
	It's called the greater fool approach, the Wall Street approach to this.
	And then in the first six months of this year, they had sales that went up to 2.3 million, but they still lost $23 million.
	And that's just in the first half of the year.
	So if you look at it at the same rate, if that continues, or if it increases, as it appeared to do, that'd be $56 million that they'd lose this year.
	And so they had to file this.
	Evidently, they're publicly traded in one way or the other.
	So they had to file this report with the SEC.
	And as part of the report, they had to say, we may not be a going concern.
	In other words, we may have to shut down.
	We may have to declare bankruptcy.
	We may not be able to pay our loans, they said.
	And so, with all of that, yet you can add this to the ledger of all the different businesses that Trump has run into the ground.
	This is a guy who cannot operate a casino for a profit.
	And so he goes on with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton, and they talk about, you know, he starts bragging about how well he and Tucker did on Twitter, not on his platform.
	And he said, it was huge, made 300 million people watch it, but of course those are the people who are scrolling past it for the most part of watching it for a couple of seconds that it counts.
	And so they said, well, would you consider Tucker as a vice president?
	Well, I like Tucker a lot.
	I guess I would.
	I think I'd say I would.
	Yeah, he'll say anything to get attention or votes.
	And so then he had this to say, which was even more interesting.
	Then him floating the idea, oh yeah, I'd be open to it.
	Does Tucker want to do it?
	No, Tucker says he doesn't want to do it.
	But he says, when they say you guys are conservative or that I'm conservative, it's not that we're conservative.
	We have common sense.
	He's not conservative.
	He has no principles whatsoever.
	Certainly not conservative principles.
	We want to have safe borders, and so we want to have a wall because walls work, except he didn't do that.
	He told people that was what he's going to do.
	Now he's out there bragging about how he's going to round people up and he's going to put them in camps.
	I don't know if he's talking about illegal immigrants or if he's talking about American citizens and his freedom cities, right?
	But he failed to do that, just like he failed to do the wall.
	I guess 4D chess, as Alex used to always talk about, it's 4D chess.
	Don't worry. You know, he said he was going to do this, but he didn't do it.
	And, you know, he had these, we thought he was conservative, but he's not conservative.
	He's just telling people whatever he needs to tell them in order to get what he wants.
	What does he want? Well, he wants things for himself.
	As his lawyer Ty Cobb said, he is...
	Incapable of acting.
	Deeply wounded narcissist.
	Incapable of acting except in his own self-interest.
	That's what 4D chess is about.
	His own self-interest.
	Or now, out of revenge.
	That was the other thing Ty Cobb said, and that's the big part of this now.
	So 4D chess just means rejecting policies, rejecting principles, rejecting any morality, doing whatever it takes to win.
	For his personal ambition.
	Yeah, we're not conservative, he says.
	Well, I kind of noticed that.
	Anyway, as far as Tucker goes, he said in the past, I've known and talked to every president for a while, for more than 30 years.
	And, you know, I can't think of anyone whose life was improved by that.
	So I would say that he's wise enough to realize that he'd like to make $25, $30 million or more every year rather than being a president.
	But Trump...
	Is out there laying on the BS really thick.
	Really thick. Sweeping raids, giant camps, mass deportations.
	As he was saying over the weekend.
	And again, none of this is anything he's going to do.
	But this is being used by the mainstream media to energize their base.
	That's the purpose of Trump.
	The purpose of Trump. Two purposes.
	For the mainstream media and the left is to make sure that he gets the nomination because he'll lose the general election because he can't win the independents.
	Not going to win the independents.
	Do you think, by the way, if he were to, you know, he wants to keep distancing himself from abortion, and so do these other Republicans, and so does Ann Coulter.
	Ann Coulter, by the way, was wrong about Trump calling him God Emperor because God is politics to her, right?
	And, um, so, um, yeah, he was God Emperor Trump and now he's public enemy number one.
	But, um, yeah, he doesn't have any, um, anything that he's going to offer us that we really need.
	And he's not going to do anything that he says.
	Um, so preparing to round up people living in the United States without legal permission on a vast scale and sprawling camps.
	Well, again, you know, as he runs away from principles and promises and, you know, the Second Amendment, the Constitution, all of this stuff, as he runs away from it, do you think that by getting rid of, by walking away from the pro-life movement, he clung to them more than any other group?
	Not that he believed any of the principles or cared about any of it, obviously, but, you know, he wanted to get in with evangelicals.
	And so do you think by throwing them away, Throwing away that issue, you think he's going to get the independent vote?
	Of course not. Even if the independents want abortion, they don't want Trump.
	Nobody wants Trump, but the GOP. The GOP absolutely loves him.
	Absolutely loves him.
	It's a difficult place for me to be because everybody who would agree with me on issues disagrees with me on Trump because they throw away all of their positions on these issues so they can support Trump.
	They have Trump derangement syndrome, a particular type of Trump derangement syndrome, and that is the bipolar Trump derangement syndrome.
	They hate this stuff, they hate his lockdowns, they hate the jab, they call it poison and all the rest of this, but they love him and they don't want to hold him responsible for any of it.
	They're not only deranged, they're bipolar.
	It's like the entire country in 2020, the early spring, the entire country was OCD, obsessive compulsive disorder.
	Don't touch the gas pumps, you'll die.
	All the rest of this stuff.
	You know, people walking in one door and out the other and things on the floor and keep apart and wear your mask before you sit down, but then you can take your mask off.
	They were totally OCD. And the Republicans...
	Who would typically like what I have to say because we agree on principle, but we disagree about the fact that Trump's going to do anything about this because he obviously isn't.
	He wouldn't even stop DACA when he was in.
	But now he's going to deport everybody?
	He wouldn't even stop them coming in.
	You know, his position was, well, I can't stop an Obama executive order.
	Let me ask the Supreme Court.
	And of course, the Supreme Court chimed in and said, no, you can't stop an executive order from Biden.
	And so, is Trump just incompetent?
	Or do the people that he hired didn't know how to do this?
	He didn't have to go through and try to do it through the regulatory.
	That was the technical details that were in there that the Supreme Court objected to.
	Bottom line is, it's an executive order.
	Just write another executive order.
	Say, this is hereby suspended.
	You can do that, you know?
	You can cancel the previous guy's executive order with your executive order.
	That's not rocket science.
	DACA, as I point out in this story from the New York Times, I think it is.
	It's on Yahoo. DACA is an Obama-era, you should say error, E-R-R-O-R, except it wasn't an error for them.
	It's an Obama-era program that shields from deportation, grants work permits to people who are brought unlawfully into the U.S. as children.
	Trump tried to end it.
	Poor thing. But the Supreme Court blocked him on procedural grounds in June 2020.
	What's the procedure? He did a different procedure than to just say, here's my new executive order.
	That one is canceled. It's not complicated.
	Trump had similarly vowed to carry out mass deportations when running for office in 2016.
	But he didn't do that either.
	But now, we should not only believe him, but the mainstream media wants you to be very afraid of him as well.
	Now, here's what he's going to do.
	He's created a civil war, ongoing civil war in the Republican Party, and the election is going to be a precursor to a civil war because the Democrats won it really badly, and Trump is their guy.
	Look, here's where I part company with a lot of people.
	I will say this. I will say that Trump is not stupid.
	I will say that Trump is not incompetent.
	I will say that Trump is controlled.
	Trump always supported Hillary Clinton.
	He gave money to Hillary Clinton.
	He's a New York Democrat. He is opposed to us on every fundamental principle because the Constitution is fundamental.
	And he's opposed to that.
	And he is doing everything that Davos and the UN wants while complaining about what they do.
	So people hear him complaining.
	The squeaky wheel whining about all this stuff as he does everything they want.
	The perfect cover.
	The Manchurian candidate.
	Oh, I hate that Chinese Communist Party, except, you know, they were the ones who put him in office, that type of thing.
	And the Manchurian candidate not saying that about Trump.
	But Trump whines and complains about the globalists, and yet he does everything that they want.
	What an interesting coincidence, isn't it?
	So Trump says that he will pursue his political rivals, and of course he will.
	That'll be part of the Civil War, if he were to win.
	I don't think he's going to win, and I think his people, because they love him so much, they can't believe that he could possibly lose.
	And so that, alongside the deliberate political persecution that you see of the J6 people, January 6th people, that will be it.
	They'll say, well, that's it. Elections are over.
	We might as well get the gun and take it into our own hands.
	Because look at this. Trump's lost twice.
	That's it. That's it.
	Proof that we've got to have a violent revolution because of Donald Trump.
	That's exactly what the Democrats and the globalists want.
	He's their guy. Don't follow him.
	And I'm telling you that. I told people don't follow him to January the 6th.
	Don't send him money. Don't send Alex Jones money.
	What did people send Alex Jones money for?
	He wasn't paying for any of the trial cases.
	Of course, Trump didn't either.
	He stiffed the lawyers.
	Kept the money himself.
	But why would you send him money for this stuff?
	I never understood that.
	And I knew exactly what was going to happen.
	It was going to be filled with agent provocateurs, and it was going to be used to demonize this entire conservative movement.
	And it's going to be used to drive a wedge in the country, to drive us into civil war.
	So, he is saying, now, if they want to follow through on this, yeah.
	It could certainly happen in reverse.
	They've released the genie out of the box.
	A man who isn't capable of acting except out of his own self-interest or revenge.
	And now the genie is out of the box, he says.
	And so Thursday, after this program on Thursday, I didn't talk about it yesterday.
	First time I was back was yesterday.
	He went on with Univision and he said the quiet part out loud.
	I've always said this is obvious where he's going.
	But now he's bragging about it, boasting about it.
	And so on Thursday, when he went on with Univision, he said he could very well embark on a revenge tour against his own political enemies.
	And his son, Don Jr., floated the idea of installing an acting attorney general who wants to unleash, quote, a reign of terror.
	This is really Third World Banana Republic type of rhetoric, and it's going to get us a Third World Banana Republic.
	These people have absolutely...
	I have pushed us into this.
	It's not funny. It's not entertaining anymore.
	He's just obnoxious, and he's going to push us into a civil war.
	If I happen to be president, and I see somebody who is doing well and beating me very badly, I'll say, go down and indict them, he said.
	Okay, yeah. Just like, hey, my people are great people.
	I could shoot them in the street. And they still vote for me.
	And then he shot them in the arm.
	And he shot everybody else in the world in the arm with his poison.
	And they still vote for him.
	And so, why is he saying, you know, he'd go down and indict them?
	For what? For breaking the law?
	No. Because they're beating him badly.
	Beating him badly.
	Simply about politics.
	He wrote Friday, the next day, on Truth Social.
	And, you know, thankfully, other people are looking at true social, so I don't have to go there.
	Not too many people do, I guess.
	Maybe they would not even make a million dollars if it wasn't for people going there to find out what Trump is saying.
	The only fraud was committed by A.G. Letitia James in convincing the judge that Mar-a-Lago was worth only $18 million.
	She should be prosecuted.
	So, as he's previously pointed out, and it's been reported by Rolling Stones, he has got his advisors creating a plan to take revenge against Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, Special Counsel Jack Smith, I imagine James as well.
	And the way they're thinking about this, as Don Jr.
	is saying, Well, you know, we could put a couple of people in positions like that.
	We talk about Mike Davis as Attorney General.
	He said we could put Laura Loomer in as Press Secretary for a couple of days.
	Laura Looney is what I call her.
	She's absolutely deranged.
	This is one of the most deranged people.
	And any media, alternative, mainstream, anything, Laura Looney is crazy.
	Absolutely crazy. This is what they want to do.
	It's going to be a reality TV show, putting in somebody like that.
	A totally deranged person.
	But you have Rona McDaniel, the RNC chair, who has had a lot of fingers pointed at her.
	For being responsible for the losses on Tuesday.
	So she went on shows on Sunday.
	On Sunday shows on CNN's State of the Union.
	And she was asked directly as to whether or not they would support Trump if he was convicted.
	And she says, well, we're in a primary right now.
	And the RNC is doing our best to make sure that we're getting our candidates visibility.
	Are you really? No, what they're doing is they're doing their best to exert their control.
	That's one of the problems with Rona McDaniel.
	Because they're shutting down candidates talking to each other.
	Can't have two candidates on a show on Fox News.
	Can't have multiple candidates go to a family dinner in Iowa.
	Because, you know, it might turn into something that looks a little bit like a debate.
	We can't have that. The RNC is going to carefully control who gets on the ballot, who gets into debates, what is talked about is what they really want to control.
	You see, censorship comes in so many different ways, doesn't it?
	You know, I said this for the longest time.
	I said, you know, when you look at how they controlled the debates back in the 90s when I was involved with the third party, We went through all kinds of hoops to get on the ballot, but then we couldn't get into the debates.
	And how did they control the debates?
	Well, they said the debates are being run by a private organization, and so they can do whatever they wish.
	Does that sound familiar? Did they use that same excuse for social media censorship?
	Well, you know, Twitter and Facebook, that's their own private thing, and they can censor whoever they wish, even though they are the digital public square.
	And in our particular case, it was the North Carolina Association of Broadcasters that was running the debates.
	It was the press that was running the debates, and the press said, well, we don't want to have a third candidate on there.
	We're just going to have these two and ask them the same questions, as we always do.
	And so they always use this excuse of, well, it's privately owned and they can do whatever they want.
	Except that wasn't the attitude of this country.
	Middle of the 20th century, 1946, Marsh v.
	Alabama, they said, you can't shut down private speech.
	And the public square, even if the public square is privately owned.
	But this is the way that they run this stuff.
	In the same way that when we saw the mask, your mask doesn't protect you, it protects other people.
	They've been saying that forever about the measles vaccines or whatever.
	And they knew that they were going to do this again with the Trump shots, the genetic code injections.
	They have these little lies that they use, this lying narrative that they use over and over again.
	And so the RNC is like the North Carolina Association of Broadcasters.
	They want to control who gets in, and they want to especially control what is said.
	You know, if we have a third-party candidate in there, you don't have to answer their questions.
	You know, if you're any good at all, you can take their question.
	I'm glad you asked that.
	But let me first say...
	Just pivot on to whatever you want to talk about.
	I mean, a good guy does that all the time.
	If you're good at it, right?
	So that's why they don't want to have just anybody in the debates.
	Because then you might talk about just anything.
	And they want to carefully control what is talked about.
	And so, Rona McDaniel...
	It's responsible for this stuff.
	She's responsible for there being no substantive debate.
	And now she is saying, we're giving our candidates visibility.
	No, you're not. You're telling them they can't go here.
	They can't go there. They can't talk to each other.
	You're shutting down political discourse.
	That's the point of the Republican National Committee.
	That's the point of the Democrat National Committee.
	The DNC and the RNC are there to shut down candidates and shut down debates to control the ballot so they can control the whole process from the very beginning.
	Look, Counting the votes is just extraneous at the end, really.
	And, of course, it's very easy for them to hack that, either way they want to go.
	But they really shut things down from the very beginning.
	And so they asked her on CNN, well, if Trump is your nominee and he's convicted of a crime, do you believe he would be the appropriate nominee for the Republican Party?
	She says, whoever the voters choose as the appropriate nominee.
	And she said, Dana Bash said, even if he's a convicted criminal?
	She says, well, I know this is newsworthy, but as party chair, I'll support whoever the voters choose.
	And yes, if they choose Trump.
	She said, the voters look at this and they think this is a two-tiered system of justice.
	And she's right. And it is a two-tiered justice system.
	It is a political persecution.
	And so the GOP gets that.
	The question is, do the independents?
	And when the independents look at this and they say, well, you know, Yeah, it looks like they're reaching on this, but I think there's something there.
	This guy just seems sleazy, smarmy.
	He's a jerk.
	I really don't like him, so I'm not going to vote for him anyway, right?
	And that's what they're counting on.
	And it does energize the Democrat base.
	And so you look again at Wayne Allen Root, who is always rooting for Trump.
	The truth about why the GOP keeps losing elections.
	The first answer is simple.
	He said the number one problem in America and the number one problem for the GOP is open borders.
	See, for Wayne Allyn Root, even though he says that the Trump shot was poison, he doesn't call it the Trump shot.
	He would tell Trump to stop pushing it because it's not in his best interest.
	You're not going to win if you do that.
	But that's not the number one problem, just like it's not the number one problem for Tucker.
	Tucker said we've had these two, the two worst problems.
	You know, in my life from government has been Biden in Ukraine.
	You know, not 9-11, not Afghanistan, not the Iraq war that we were lied into.
	Not the police state that emerged.
	Not the second shooter drop from 9-11, which was the Trump lockdown.
	None of that. None of that.
	Boy, these people, they do a great job of spinning you, don't they?
	Yeah, not medical martial law, not any of that.
	Trump did nothing about the borders.
	Wayne. So why are you still rooting for him?
	He didn't lock down the border.
	What Trump did was he locked down us.
	He said Americans were not essential.
	Americans had to get locked down.
	And, you know, he talks about all this poison, the poisonous drugs that they're shipping across the border.
	Does he not like competition for the pharmaceutical companies?
	Is there anything out there, fentanyl or anything else out there, that's killed more people than his shot?
	Yeah, you want to talk about the war of drugs against us by our own government?
	You want to talk about these cartels that they have created that are bringing in dangerous drugs?
	But there's no more dangerous drug than what Trump did, and these people don't want to ascribe it to him.
	They're bipolar. He goes, I said for years that Rona is poison.
	That's what he's talking about, Rona McDaniel.
	He's not talking about Corona.
	Yeah. He's not talking about the Corona poison shot of Donald Trump.
	No, he says Rona.
	Rona McDaniel is poisoned.
	No, it was a phony Rona that locked us all down.
	And it was a poisonous jab that locked us all down.
	That's amazing. So, hates the jab.
	Tells Trump to stop bragging about his poison and supports him anyway.
	That's where these people are.
	And if we go back and we look at his failures, right?
	Trump ran the Miss Universe contest.
	And I just got an email from somebody who, and I'm sympathetic to him, because he said, well, I'm trying to, you know, get Trump's attention and tell him that he's got to get away from this LGBT stuff.
	And I was like, do you not know?
	That he's one of the pioneers of that?
	Just like he supported Hillary Clinton for years and gave money to her for years, he supported the transgender insanity.
	When Trump owned Miss Universe, he started pushing that in.
	As a matter of fact, if you go back and look, he was one of the earliest ones to do it.
	And so now, this has reached...
	I guess we could call instead the Miss Universe...
	We could call it the Miss Transverse, because everything's going sideways on this.
	This year we've had at least two different countries have had a transgender who has been sent to the Miss Universe big contest.
	And the Miss Universe pageant has now filed for bankruptcy.
	So you can add to the six casino bankruptcies that Trump has declared.
	His impending truth social bankruptcy that's there.
	You can also add to this the bankruptcy of Miss Universe because even though Trump doesn't own it anymore, He does own the idea of let's stick trainees into dresses and parade them around at the Miss Universe contest.
	It has a liquidity problem, just like Truth Social does.
	And if you go back to 2012, there was a person named Talakova who was a guy who Competing as a woman in Canada.
	And Canada said, you can't do that.
	The Canadian affiliate of Miss Universe.
	And Trump owned Miss Universe at the time.
	And he overruled them.
	And he bragged about it.
	Here's a clip. The story about the contestant who wanted to become Miss Universe by going through Canada.
	Very interesting.
	It's become a big, big story.
	We let her in.
	Let's see what happens.
	Maybe she'll do well.
	Maybe she won't.
	You have 58 different girls trying to be...
	She's not a girl. It'll be very interesting to see what happens.
	If for some reason she should win, well, then she has to win the Miss Universe contest.
	Everybody wants to be Miss Universe.
	I don't think it's going to be easy.
	We've had a great season on The Apprentice.
	Sunday night it was a three-hour episode.
	I've never even heard of a three-hour episode for anything.
	Yeah. He's never heard of my show either.
	Yeah. He did one three-hour episode once.
	I do it every day.
	Okay. But getting back to the transgender thing.
	So, in 2012, this person, this guy, Talakova, wants to run in the Miss Universe thing, gets kicked out in Canada.
	Trump overrules them, says no.
	She will be allowed to compete.
	She. And as I said before, you look at these people's past.
	People who support Trump is like, I've got to explain to him why this transgender stuff is just so harmful to kids and why it's such a bad thing.
	He's been pushing it since 2012.
	He's been pushing it for 11 years.
	He's pushing it way before anybody else did.
	And so did Mike Flynn, who's out there with his pseudo-gospel revival and his tent revivals and stuff.
	Michael Flynn was pushing the transgender stuff.
	They had the Pentagon Pride Month, the second Pentagon Pride.
	He used Kristen Beck.
	Who now has said, I was pushed into this.
	I didn't know what I was doing, even though I was an adult.
	He said, they're doing this to kids, and they got me, an adult Navy SEAL, to buy into this stuff.
	They railroaded me into it, and then used me.
	And the person who used him was Michael Flynn.
	The person who started all of this men competing in beauty pageants was Donald Trump.
	And at the same time, he said, yeah, I think they ought to compete in sports as well.
	What is the matter with these Trump derangement MAGA people?
	They really don't understand.
	And so, this bankruptcy of the Miss Universe contest.
	It really just follows in a long line of things, but perhaps they could add it to the Biff Tannen Museum.
	Biff, of course, was modeled after Donald Trump by Zemeckis and the writer of Back to the Future.
	Yeah, there he is.
	Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Biff Tannen Museum, dedicated to Hill Valley's number one citizen and America's greatest living folk hero, Donald Trump.
	One and only Biff Tannen.
	Of course we've all heard the legend, but who is the man?
	Inside you will learn how Biff Tannen became one of the richest and most powerful men in America.
	Discover how in 1979 Biff successfully lobbied to legalize gambling and turned Hill Valley's dilapidated courthouse into a beautiful casino hotel.
	I just want to say one thing.
	God bless America.
	Meet the women who shared in his passion as he searched for true love.
	Oh, it's so spot on, isn't it?
	My son says, yeah, everybody wants to be Miss Universe.
	Women, men, everyone.
	It's universal appeal.
	And it's universally open to anybody of any gender to be a Miss.
	And, of course, the other issues about what Trump did...
	With the Miss Universe contest.
	All surfaced in 2016, just before the election, as his comments to the Bush guy were publicized.
	But people started collecting things that he had said and things that he had done as he ran the beauty contest there.
	As owner, he became embroiled in a conflict involving Alicia Mercado of Venezuela.
	Remember that? She was the reigning Miss Universe at the time, and then she gained weight after she won the title.
	Trump went on a public crusade to shame her.
	Wearing a suit and tie and trailed by cameras, he followed Mikado into a gym to watch her work out.
	Quote, this is somebody that likes to eat, unquote, he said.
	You see, his same despicable character, trolling and attacking people.
	He said, this is somebody who likes to eat.
	The controversy resurfaced during the 2016 campaign when Hillary Clinton said he called this woman Miss Piggy.
	Then he called her Miss Housekeeping because she was Hispanic.
	And anyway, it was not just that.
	He went on with Howard Stern.
	And he bragged about how he could go into the beauty pageants, including the Miss Teen Universe, young girls.
	And he told Howard Stern, he says, yeah, I'll go backstage before show and everybody's getting dressed and everything else.
	And you know, no men are anywhere, but I'm allowed to go in because I'm the owner of the pageant.
	And therefore I'm inspecting it, he told Howard Stern.
	You know, they're standing there with no clothes on.
	And he went on with David Letterman.
	And he said, yeah, you know, when I took over this beauty contest, he said the bathing suits got smaller, the heels got higher, and the ratings went up.
	Is this guy despicable or not?
	It's not just his wives that he divorces and then trolls, and then there are the people who, you know, work for him and everything.
	He's just beyond despicable.
	And then notice what was said by Miss California Carrie Prejean.
	It was said in her memoir when she was in the contest, she talked about how Trump would pit people against each other.
	Does that sound familiar as well?
	She said Trump walked out with his entourage and he inspected us closer than any general ever inspected a platoon.
	He'd stop in front of a girl, look her up and down and say, hmm, Then he would go on and do the same thing to the next girl.
	And he took notes on a little pad as he went along.
	And after he did this, Trump said, okay, I want all the girls to come forward.
	And he'd look at Miss Alabama.
	And he'd say, come here. And she takes a step forward.
	Tell me, who's the most beautiful woman here?
	Mirror, mirror on the wall, right?
	Miss Alabama's eyes swam around.
	She says, besides me, I like Arkansas.
	She's sweet. Well, I don't care if she's sweet, said Trump.
	Is she hot? And it became clear, said Carrie Prejean, it became clear that the point of the whole exercise was for him to divide the room between girls he personally found attractive and those he did not.
	The girls, many of the girls, found this exercise to be humiliating.
	Some of the girls were sobbing backstage after he left, devastated to have failed even before the competition really began to impress the Donald.
	This is what this guy's about.
	The most reprehensible public figures I've ever seen in my life.
	As the story of Perception says, if you look at it, MAGA is being conditioned to believe that anyone against Trump is anti-America.
	Yeah, tell me about it.
	That's my life. I don't wear a mask.
	I can't get a seat in a restaurant and all the rest of the stuff.
	And if I don't wear the Trump MAGA cap, I can't get a seat at the table with anything else.
	What will they do if Trump loses?
	I've had MAGA folks say they want to shoot me just for saying the truth.
	Yeah, me too.
	Michael DeSilvio. Walls designed to keep people out will eventually be used to keep people in.
	That's what Ron Paul said.
	So be careful about those walls of the border.
	And then, of course, the guy who's going to build the walls of the border, which fortunately he didn't do, But, you know, didn't do anything.
	Again, the problem, folks, every time we look at an issue, what are we going to do?
	We're going to use law enforcement to fix it.
	And your government is going to ban this or ban that or do this or do that.
	And a good example of this is the abortion stuff, right?
	You have to really change hearts and minds.
	How do you change hearts and minds of people who are coming here?
	Well, quite frankly, you just take away the welfare state.
	We're giving more welfare to people who come here illegally than we do to American citizens or to legal immigrants.
	We're giving the illegal people more benefits.
	And there's an obvious reason for that.
	That's a Cloward and Piven strategy.
	But take away the benefits.
	Don't give them more benefits.
	Don't give them the same benefits.
	Give them no benefits.
	Because we had people who came here in massive numbers, the early part of the 20th century, There was no welfare state.
	They were on their own. How many times have you heard the real Ellis Island story?
	It's not what we see at the border.
	The real Ellis Island story is somebody coming from Europe or something and they've got five bucks in their pocket.
	And they're coming here basically penniless.
	And they came here for the freedom, not for the free stuff.
	And if you want to fix what's happening at the border, that's what you do.
	You still have to have some enforcement because we still got the drug war thing that's happening.
	And again, you know, that's another prohibition that has failed, but it's created some very powerful gangs.
	And so, you know, you have to be careful that you don't have terrorists or criminals coming in.
	If you really wanted to protect this country, but they don't want to protect this country.
	They're doing everything they can to destroy this country.
	They're overextending us in foreign wars everywhere to protect every other border except this one.
	And as we're overextended abroad, they send a fifth column in to attack us.
	Or maybe instead of calling it a fifth column, you know, the anecdote of that, I think it was a Spanish Civil War, and, you know, they were talking about what was happening.
	He said, well, we've got four columns going at this city at this time.
	And he goes, but we've got a fifth column.
	Fifth column? Yeah, that's inside the city.
	Well, we've got, what, seven wars?
	Because Trump didn't end, well, six.
	Afghanistan ended it for us.
	So we got six wars.
	And then, you know, now we've got the thing that's happening in the broader Middle East war that they're trying to organize.
	We got the Ukrainian war and trying to get the Chinese war.
	So, you know, we call this the sixth, the seventh, the eighth, the ninth, the tenth column.
	The people who are coming into this country.
	DG8, David, the purpose of Trump is to eliminate resistance or accountability.
	Trump worshippers equal sit back, do nothing, watch Trump fix everything.
	Yeah, that used to be a characteristic of the left.
	I remember, you know, oh yeah, they want government solutions to everything.
	Government is a solution. And not only that, there ought to be a law.
	There ought to be a welfare program.
	And it needs to be done at the federal level.
	You know, that was always the Democrats when I was growing up.
	That's why I said Republicans have become the Democrats.
	The Democrats have become full-on communists.
	They've become Maoists, as a Xi Van Fleet point out last week.
	But yeah, they have become pacified.
	And they believe in big government.
	That's the big problem. The GOP base believes in big government.
	They believe Trump is going to save them with everything.
	They believe the solution to everything is in Washington.
	And it's not. We're going to talk a little bit about that before our guest joins us.
	There's an organization that has started called ARC. Try to position itself as a counter to Davos.
	And so you ask some questions, okay, who are the financial supporters with this?
	Is this really, you know, one of these things like the trust, what the Bolsheviks did to find out who their opposition is?
	No, they know who their opposition is.
	And the healthy thing about the ARC people, it was set up and they had an agenda and it was structured in the same way that Davos structures their stuff.
	However, It couldn't be more opposite in terms of the content.
	And their focus was to tell people to act locally.
	And that's the key thing.
	Act locally. And I've said that for the longest time.
	You know, the left has always said, think globally, act locally.
	And so how are you going to stop this?
	Well, you counteract them locally.
	And you understand what their globalist plan is.
	You know, these people are planning this on a global basis, but they enact it locally.
	They're telling you what they're doing, and they're telling you how to counteract what they're doing.
	You understand their plan globally, and then you stop it at the local level.
	That's the key thing.
	Jeff Ingram, sorry, just ran together when I looked at it, 3355.
	Isn't that what Biden did when he got in?
	He reversed all the executive orders that Trump did.
	Except for these, he didn't reverse the executive orders for the bump stop.
	He didn't reverse the executive order for the lockdowns and the jabs and the rest of this medical martial law stuff.
	He extended it.
	So, you know, they get rid of what they don't like.
	And they continue on the other stuff.
	Sigmund was a fraud.
	Yes, he was. A wall to keep us in.
	The smart cities. Freedom cities.
	Call it freedom cities. You see, for the Democrats, for the Democrats, they call it a smart city.
	And they're too dumb to understand that it means self-monitoring reporting technology.
	And then for the Republicans, Trump will tell you it's all about freedom.
	It's really an open-air prison.
	They got everybody figured out, don't they?
	Time we figured them out.
	Distorted perceptions. The fact that Trump skipped debates shows he fears having to face those big pharma questions.
	He knows what they are and what they did.
	He's a good old boy for his masters.
	Militin Milankovic.
	Trusting in the media is one of the biggest issues.
	It's like the people aren't aware of Project Mockingbird.
	Yeah. Yeah.
	Think for yourself. Don't believe anybody.
	Don't believe what I say.
	Look it up. Good footprints.
	Trump owns stock in Pfizer and Johnson& Johnson, who manufactured the MRA-based COVID-19 vaccines.
	And of course, Johnson& Johnson, I think, got one of the best sweetheart deals.
	Of course, they've had to shut it down.
	Johnson& Johnson was not even in the vaccine business.
	And so Trump got them into the vaccine business.
	They desperately needed a profit center because they had been sued for knowingly selling talcum powder to people when it was giving people cancer and lung.
	I forget exactly what it caused, but some kind of cancer or respiratory disease.
	They knew about it. They continued to sell the talc and the baby powder.
	They were right there at the center of the opioid epidemic.
	As a matter of fact, they were the manufacturing people for Sackler, Purdue Pharmaceutical.
	They had Johnson& Johnson make it for them.
	And so they're getting hit with all these different things.
	You know, what you guys need is you need a product that has absolutely no liability.
	I can tell that's exactly what you need.
	You've got lawsuits out the door here.
	You need a product with no liability.
	You need to start getting into the vaccine business.
	And, of course, that didn't last too long.
	But they set them up in it. You know, they got them sweetheart deals on factories that were shut down and pushed them into it.
	And Johnson& Johnson subbed it out to another company.
	But that eventually went bankrupt like some of Trump's other enterprises.
	We'll be right back. You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
	From country to blues, classic hits to news, APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
	Get details at APSRadio.com.
	All right, let's talk a little bit about the pharmaceutical stuff because we have Bill Gates as well as Peter Thiel.
	Moving themselves into global health AI. They're about harvesting the data.
	Why? Well, because that gives them a great deal of leverage, a great deal of control.
	You look at the leverage they have with food, they also have that same leverage with health.
	And it is a part of requiring people to get a global ID. This is what Gates did in India with the Adhar system.
	Well, you're not going to get any welfare, he said to the poor people.
	You're not going to get any health care if you don't take my mark of the beast number here.
	And so it's going to advance quote-unquote global health.
	Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has plowed millions of dollars into a vague scheme that claims that To offer healthcare delivery systems to improve the livelihood of citizens around the world.
	Everybody needs an ID, he said.
	Oh, that's kind of a strange statement.
	What do I need an ID for?
	Well, you're going to need it in order to be able to eat, in order to be able to get healthcare, that type of thing.
	This is coming from Slay News.
	Researchers from the University of Vermont, Oxford University, and the University of Cape Town, South Africa, have issued a firm rebuke of Gates' plans.
	There are at least three reasons to believe that the unfettered imposition of these tools into already fragile and fragmented healthcare delivery systems risk doing far more harm than good, said the researchers, as they released this paper in the British Medical Journal.
	And that followed the fact that Gates' organization in early August of this year invested $5 million to bankroll 48 AI-based projects for quote-unquote healthcare, especially in low- or middle-income families.
	And again, it's his leverage that he has into our lives.
	But it's also getting into the base.
	He's going to make money out of it as well.
	And he's not the only one.
	When you look at Peter Thiel, They're very concerned about this in the UK. At least Unheard.com did a very good article about why is Palantir inserting itself into the national health system?
	And since World War II, the national health system, I think that's when it began, when they went into their welfare state after World War II. It has been dearly beloved by the British people.
	It's government-run health care.
	Which, I don't think it served them well, when we look at it.
	I don't think any government-run healthcare serves people well.
	And I think that ultimately, it's about death panels and the rest of the stuff, as we saw in 2020.
	We're going to determine who gets this, under what conditions you get it.
	We'll do the triage and decide who we're going to euthanize, that type of thing.
	You're going to have to ration resources one way or the other.
	I'd rather have them rationed in a free market than by a government.
	It's just that simple.
	We don't have infinite resources, even though that's what the globalist elite are trying to convince us that we do have.
	Elon Musk and the rest of them are trying to convince us that we have infinite capacity for manufacturing.
	It is a fatal conceit that goes all the way back to Karl Marx.
	Nevertheless, we don't.
	And so it will be rationed by someone, free market or by a centrally controlled economy.
	Well, Peter Thiel is trying to insert his way into the NHS. And again, unheard.com is coming out of the UK. And they said, again, by saying, you know, everybody said something in hindsight that they regret.
	Peter Thiel has commented on the NHS and has said that it actually makes people sick.
	Well, he's right about that.
	They certainly, you know, they have very long waiting lines and a lot of people died waiting to get cancer treatment.
	And he said the British people love it.
	But he says, I think that's simply a manifestation of Stockholm Syndrome.
	In fact, they love it so much.
	As a matter of fact, they love it so much, the politicians use it.
	I'm going to protect the NHS. You know, the institution becomes more important than the mission.
	The NHS to the British people has become more important than their own health.
	And we saw that during 2020.
	You had Boris Johnson. Save the NHS. It wasn't saying, save your life, save your neighbor, save the British people.
	No. Save the NHS. The institution must survive.
	Not just continuity of government.
	It's continuity of bureaucracy.
	The bureaucracy must be saved.
	So... They said in spite of his apparent disdain for the NHS, Palantir, the company that he founded, first he made a lot of money with PayPal, he and Elon Musk, and then he went on to found Palantir.
	And of course, Palantir's CEO, Alex Karp, has been a regular Bilderberg since it was created.
	And it was created, as I mentioned many times, that Palantir is one of the best examples of what I've said about social media.
	Palantir is a data mining company.
	Palantir takes the information that's available And of course, now with artificial intelligence, that's what AI is all about.
	AI is about scraping the internet, grabbing data about everybody so that you can, you know, figure out things about everybody.
	But that's really what social media was about to start with.
	They're just getting better at it.
	AI is just another tool to help to aggregate and to mine that data that they put out there.
	And they created the internet so they could have the data out there to know about you.
	And as I've said many times, the internet itself was an invention of J.C.R. Licklider at DARPA in the 1960s, early 1960s.
	He's a psychologist.
	So, yeah, this would be very effective for us to control people with.
	And it didn't get practical until the late 90s, when the technology started getting up to speed.
	And at that point, you had all the intelligence community, CIA, NHS, sorry, NHS, NSA, all of them getting on the boards of venture capital firms that were giving money to these social media companies, these internet companies, to make everything free, right?
	The government was channeling that money in.
	And these people became multibillionaires, but they started this all free stuff with government money.
	The CIA even went public with In-Q-Tel.
	They never had a public venture capital firm, but it was so important for them to have the internet that they did that.
	And so that's what Palantir is about.
	Palantir is more specific, and they sell their services for that, but that's what the entire internet is about.
	Palantir, partly funded in its early days by the CIA, and with Western armies among its clients, is causing high anxiety.
	Corey Kreider, director of a campaign group dedicated to challenging the excesses of tech giants, says, is Palantir really the kind of company that we want at the very heart of the National Health Service?
	This is a company who, at the start of the pandemic, had no track record of working with health care staff.
	They're not a health care company.
	They weren't a health data company.
	They were essentially a tech company who supported spies.
	Police, the military, and border forces.
	Now, Palantir was part of the police surveillance state, the militarized police surveillance state.
	Palantir had signs up all over the Washington subway and all the rest of the stuff, and they sold their stuff.
	It was funded by the CIA. Palantir, in partnership with Accenture is in the running with a British company called Quantexa.
	They are also partnered with IBM. To build the Federated Data Platform, the FDP, in order to support staff to access the information they need in one safe and secure program.
	They had the JEDI program under Trump.
	You had Mattis.
	Let me do some investigation about the corruption of that.
	Mattis and his secretary.
	Especially a secular, just basically lived in Seattle at Amazon headquarters.
	And they came up with this thing, JEDI. And it was going to be a consolidation of all the Pentagon database.
	And she was constantly going out there.
	And everybody says, well, you know, here's this thing.
	It's a multi-million dollar contract, $10 million, I think, to start with.
	To have this unified Pentagon database that would be so easy for our enemies to hack and to control, right?
	But everybody said it looks like this contract was written for Amazon, for Bezos.
	And of course, you know, Mattis had his secretary going out there all the time.
	Ultimately, it went to Microsoft, because nobody's better connected now in Washington than Microsoft.
	They're connected at the hip.
	With DARPA and the rest of these, they get Microsoft to run all these programs like the CCPA, Coalition for Content, Provenance, and Authentication.
	As I like to point out, it's the Chinese Communist Party of America to weaponize censorship.
	Microsoft has partnered with the Election Guard and with News Guard and all the rest of the stuff.
	So Microsoft got the contract because they've got better connections.
	Jeff Bezos was trying to build up his presence in Washington by buying the Washington Post and doing other things like that, evidently buying General Mattis.
	But anyway, Microsoft won it.
	Amazon, however, had enough clout that they disputed that, and so they wound up splitting the contract between the two of them.
	But you notice how there's this consolidation of everything.
	We've got to build one gigantic database.
	So that's what they're doing in the UK. We've got to have the federated data platform.
	One giant database to rule them all.
	And so who are you going to turn to for that?
	Well, the people who reference Lord of the Rings, Palantir, and their very essence.
	And they have, I've done reports about them in the past, they have all this Tolkien stuff all over the place.
	And the Palantir were the crystal seeing stones, and it turned into a surveillance thing.
	It was originally used by the rulers, by the various kings, to communicate with each other over long distances.
	And then the dark side, Sauron, turned it into a surveillance thing that could not only monitor them, but could actually see inside of them.
	And that's exactly what Palantir does.
	It predicts what you're going to do.
	It's all about this anticipatory intelligence and the rest of this stuff, geospatial intelligence.
	And so they're insinuating themselves into the health system.
	Why are they doing that? Well, it is a big point of control, but I think there are other issues with it, and it's not simply about the money.
	The NHS budget this year was £182 billion, the largest repository of health data in the world.
	With the advent of AI, mining this treasure trove of data could mean the discovery of better medicines and treatments.
	Yeah, right. Yeah, just like these robots and the...
	And the brain implants, oh, they're going to be helping the lame to walk and the blind to see.
	And it's like, no, you're not Jesus.
	You're the Antichrist when you do that kind of stuff.
	So anyway, it could see the NHS being used as a cash cow.
	Or it could mean a loss of privacy.
	It could mean the end of patient trust.
	It could mean the slow death of the NHS as we know it.
	Look, forget about your bureaucracy.
	What it means is it's going to be the slow death of you.
	They're going to use this to ration and control healthcare.
	What would be the basis of an authoritarian government's rationing healthcare?
	Well, it might be whether or not they like you.
	You know, like in China.
	Sorry, you don't get any treatment because I don't like your politics or your religion.
	That's what this is ultimately about.
	This is another totalitarian tool.
	And that's what Elon Musk and Peter Thiel and Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos are all about.
	They get rich selling heinous technology to totalitarians.
	Totalitarian tech!
	So, an early investor in Palantir was the CIA through a venture capital arm named En-Q-Tel, as I said, the first of four iterations of Teal's data systems, Palantir Gotham.
	Used by the National Security Agency, the NSA, and by the FBI, and by Western military, police, and U.S. immigration services, and fraud investigators, capable of pulling together vast amounts of data and making connections that could solve problems that would be insoluble to mere humans.
	Yeah, it's about big data.
	It's about knowing everything about everybody.
	Look, it's government, right?
	Government. An all-powerful government.
	That is also all-seeing.
	It's omniscient. Omnipotent, omniscient, and everywhere omnipresent.
	It has to be in your healthcare, your food system, your energy, your transportation, everywhere.
	In March of 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic, executives from major tech companies, including Palantir, Google, Meta, Amazon, were asked by the UK government whether they could help planning and implementing their takeover.
	That's the way I put it.
	Palantir immediately stepped in, offering the use of its systems called Foundry.
	So we'll sell it to you for just one pound.
	And so they accepted it.
	Palantir Advisors were embedded in the NHS while Foundry was used in planning to effectively distribute medicines, ventilators, vaccines, and death.
	By the way, this is what Vivek the Snake Ramaswamy wanted to do on a small way.
	He couldn't pull it off.
	And when he was part of the corona team there in Ohio, he got in because he wanted to get involved in surveillance and contact tracing and the rest of this stuff.
	But yeah, these people went right to the top, into the NHS in the UK. A one-pound contract seemed odd at the time, but it obviously gave them a foot in the door.
	They will have learned about the NHS systems and contracts.
	They will have seen how the system operates.
	They'll know how best to bid for other contracts going forward.
	Ah, rope-a-dope.
	You see, what Palantir did...
	It was essentially, to the British, it was essentially the same move that the CIA, NSA, intelligence communities were doing with Palantir and with Twitter and with Facebook and all these social media companies, even Google.
	Here, it's for free.
	And now we'll use that as our leverage.
	And so they did that even to the government there.
	Palantir's next move to curry favor with the UK government was to offer its services again for six months to help with the logistics of housing Ukrainian refugees.
	Following the Russian invasion.
	And so they're in with the government.
	They ended up this way with the unheard article.
	And coming out of the UK. Whichever company is announced to be the provider of the FDP. This success will not only be judged on whether the NHS is finally blessed with a joined-up digital wizardry, but also on whether it manages to provide that and retain the trust of patients.
	If persons go to see their general practitioner and hold back important or embarrassing information because they're afraid it'll be shared with a private company, Then it's not only dangerous for the patient, but it's also very sad because that can mean the end of the doctor-patient relationship as we know it.
	Hey, folks, that ship sailed at least three years ago.
	The confidence that people should have in the doctor-patient relationship thing is done.
	These people sold us out for money.
	Why would you trust any of them?
	And now they're weaponizing this healthcare system in a different way than they weaponized it to kill us.
	My son says, wow, so nice of them to offer their services for only a pound.
	I'm sure there was no hidden way for them to make some more money.
	There's just such kind and giving people.
	They're philanthropists, of course.
	All these billionaires are.
	Andy says, they aren't aware of mockingbird.
	And if you tell them, you are the crazy one.
	Been there and done that. Yeah, exactly.
	You know, the whole thing about vaccines, for the longest time, I've been warning people about it.
	I've played it several times.
	I don't have it here today to play for you.
	But the lady who says I started talking about adult sudden death syndrome, right?
	And she said, I realized that was what happened to my child.
	She said, I killed my child.
	I was like, no, you didn't.
	She broke down in tears.
	She said, child is perfectly fine.
	Took them for a wellness checkup, and the doctor said, oh, you need to get some vaccines, got the vaccines, and the kid just died suddenly.
	A sudden infant death.
	Then they have sudden adult death syndrome, SADS, instead of SIDS. And she said when she saw that, it clicked.
	And it's still happening.
	This is a story of...
	New American has a story.
	Out of Westchester, Connecticut, I believe it is.
	A healthy 15-month-old girl died two days after receiving her routine vaccinations.
	You know, these are the ones that, you know, the measles and stuff.
	You know, those things.
	Vaccinations are so important.
	Yeah, yeah. This is really going around now.
	Yeah, you know, measles.
	He never had a measles vaccine because there wasn't a measles vaccine when he was a kid.
	Wasn't one when I was a kid.
	And we didn't have autism either.
	Anyway, the child received three unspecified vaccines on October 17th.
	Then subsequently had liver and kidney failure as well as cardiac arrest.
	Simply stopped breathing and went into cardiac arrest.
	The mother recalled it was the most horrible day of my life.
	I got to work. She waved goodbye to me that morning and then my mother called saying she was having trouble breathing.
	I just kept saying, she just had vaccines.
	She just had vaccines. You see, people now make the connection.
	That's the silver lining and the Trump poison cloud.
	The mother shared that the child had been previously hospitalized with a high fever and a body rash after receiving her routine vaccines at the age of two months.
	While Catherine suspected that it was the jabs that caused the conditions, The medics told her it was a virus.
	And then she gets them again, and it kills the baby.
	It can't be the vaccines.
	They're safe and effective. The FDA has told us so.
	They test all this stuff, you know?
	Yeah. It's not time.
	And so they put up a fundraiser, the GoFundMe page.
	And they said there, they said God's plan for Melody was to, quote, share the message about the danger of vaccines.
	She said, this is not the time or place to change anybody's opinion on medical necessity for vaccinations.
	This is for each of you to decide on your own, at your own time.
	The only lesson I hope to bring here today is that nothing is one size fits all.
	Every person, child, and baby is different.
	All of us have our own threshold of what we can handle.
	And that's the same for these little babies who are given so many vaccines.
	It's our job to spread awareness, to educate, to question, to make sure that changes are made so that babies and children are safe.
	No, I'm sorry. They got to get the vaccine.
	You got to take it. It's just going around.
	You got to get this. No exemptions for medical issues, religious beliefs or anything.
	That's what he was talking about in 2019.
	Presently, the CDC recommends that 15-month-olds get up to 10 vaccine doses.
	By the age of 18, American children will have received over 70 doses, I think it's 72, of different vaccines, with the list continually expanding.
	No other country on earth.
	Vaccinates their kids the way that we do.
	No other country on earth gave these companies that vaccinate children legal protection the way that we do because of Fauci.
	Speaking with the new American in September, vaccine researcher Brian Hooker of Children's Health Defense called the Childhood Vaccination Program a grand medical experiment on American children.
	Arguing that there is no adequate clinical trials on vaccine safety and efficacy.
	And of course, people finally saw that with the Trump shots, but it's been that way for a long time.
	And then we look at the economic...
	Whirlwind that's been unleashed on us with a lockdown by Trump, as I showed yesterday.
	You know, the same policies that were pursued in China, just destroying these prosperous cities, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and New York City here in America and other places.
	But it's not just that.
	It's not just all the businesses that they killed that Trump said were non-essential.
	But it's also the corruption, the great grift, COVID-19 aid.
	It's paid for fancy cars.
	Even a private island.
	And so, you know, they talk about a private island that's off the coast of Florida here.
	But they said that when they go through and start looking at all of the graft and corruption, of course, Uh, it was, they were warned about it.
	I remember I talked about the guy who had spent a lot of time as a, as an accountant, CPA who had worked for the government, done auditing and all the rest of the stuff.
	And he said, I called him up and said, this is going to be a disaster.
	Called up the Trump administration and nobody wanted to listen.
	He said, I finally got to somebody who would talk to me and I explained this and I said, well, you know, you're wrong.
	There hasn't been any fraud yet.
	And he says, you haven't even started the program.
	I'm talking about what you're going to do.
	Is this going to be a disaster?
	And of course it is. About 10% of the $4.3 trillion program that the U.S. government used to disperse this money to mitigate the economic devastation brought about by COVID-19.
	No, the economic devastation was, this is AP, the economic devastation was brought about by Trump and Biden.
	They're the ones who did this.
	There was no pandemic.
	It was a planned democide.
	And this was a plan to take us down.
	It was absolutely unnecessary and ineffective, even if there had been a pandemic.
	And there wasn't. They were killing people with their rules and then putting us in debt at the same time to assuage the people's companies that were being destroyed.
	The thieves came from all walks of life, all corners of the globe.
	There was a Tennessee rapper who bragged about the ease of stealing more than $700,000 and the pandemic unemployment insurance that Trump put out there.
	A former pizzeria owner, host of a cryptocurrency-themed radio show, bought an alpaca farm in Vermont.
	An ex-Nigerian government official.
	You know, I always get the Nigerian...
	Scamsters here. Who grabbed about half a million dollars in COVID-19 relief benefits was wearing a $10,000 watch and a $35,000 gold chain when he was arrested.
	Nearly 3,200 defendants have been charged with relief fraud so far.
	But the investigators won't catch every crook.
	Of course not. And, you know, when you look at that, that's really not that big a number.
	I mean, they've arrested over approaching 1,000 people because of January the 6th.
	That's just one more thing.
	You know, on Friday, as we had our Mistsis Day, and people were remembering World War I and other places, this was an article that went up on the Daily Skeptic from a British perspective.
	And they were talking about how during 2020, everything was locked down, and they couldn't pay their respects to the war memorial.
	People were afraid to do it.
	They would typically go out in the open markets and they would buy a poppy and they would lay it there in remembrance.
	But there weren't any sellers that were there There are no people that were there.
	A few people that were there had to have masks.
	There were some cops that were standing there, but they kind of indicated to them that they were not going to arrest them for trying to show up and leave a memorial flower at the memorial to the fallen soldiers of the country.
	And so this person, who wants to remain anonymous, When we look at how we behaved in 2020, the things we did, the things we stopped doing, this is irritating because the lockdown tyrants, big and small, seem likely to get away with it, just because we'd all rather never think about it again.
	And it's dangerous because it might make it easier to do this whole thing again next time.
	That's right. If we want to just walk away, you know, I think about the war.
	Going back to where Churchill was, he had offices under Whitehall.
	And, you know, they spent most of the war underground because of the bombing and things like that.
	And when Karen and I went there in the 1980s, they had not found this office.
	And then we went back in 2001 and took my sons.
	They had in the intervening years, they discovered somebody, what happened was when the war was over, you know, they had maps and they had, you know, all the plans and everything there.
	As soon as the war was over, everybody just left.
	They locked the doors and they never came back.
	And I've thought about that many times.
	And so, you know, years, decades and decades later, I think it was in the 90s at some point in time, you know, 50 years after the fact.
	And people go back and somebody just happened to open this up.
	And there were all the papers and the maps and everything, dust on them.
	But it was exactly the way that they had left it on the final day of the war.
	They just walked away. I'm so sick of this war.
	I'm not even going to, you know, clean up the papers.
	We're done, you know. And so they made a museum out of it, and you go through and, you know, they explain the stuff to you and everything.
	But that's where we are with this.
	Everybody was so sick of this COVID war that they ran against us that when they ceased their hostilities against us, everybody just walked away from it and didn't want to do anything about it.
	We can't do that.
	You know, they won that war.
	But we really lost this war.
	And I say we lost it because they were able to put structures in against us under color of law.
	And because we have left those there, as I said, our feet are hardening in concrete.
	And they're going to push us off the pier into the deep end the next time.
	If we don't get our feet out of this hardening concrete.
	They're already weaponizing this with the World Health Organization's rules, new rules and new treaty and the rest of this stuff.
	They're going to come back.
	We let the public health dictatorship stay there without punishing anybody, without firing anybody, without taking their pensions and making an example out of them.
	They're going to come back and do it again and again.
	It's not enough just to walk away from the end of this war because we didn't win this war.
	They just have a momentary truce.
	As I've said before, this is the eye of the hurricane.
	And as I always say, I grew up in Florida, they always say, you know, if you come out, you get fooled by that, and you come out of your shelter, that back half of the hurricane is even worse.
	And so, this person says, it's encouraging in a way when you remember that in the depths of the madness, certain sage members were cheerily recommending that we could all just wear masks all the time forever.
	As a scholar, I genuinely feared at one time that real in-person research seminars might never happen again.
	Especially as so many academics subscribed so piously to the Corona Creed.
	It became a religion for them.
	And I gotta say, you know, by the time we got to June of 2020, I thought, this is it, we're never gonna get out of it.
	The vast majority of people don't understand what's going on, and they're never going to wake up.
	Some churches started turning around that had locked down.
	Some churches never closed, but some of the churches that had locked down started turning around in July.
	But I really did think that the vast population was never going to catch on.
	And we've got to continue to press this.
	And so they told this story.
	About what it was like to go to that war memorial on Remembrance Day.
	And this is not the point that this person is making, but we have to have a remembrance of what was done to us.
	We have to have a remembrance of this war.
	And when I look at what's going on with Trump, And these idiots wearing their red caps, their communist red caps, and following Donald Trump.
	It's like, you people are as clueless as the leftists that you think you're owning.
	You are being owned by the Mockingbird Press.
	You're being owned by the globalists.
	You're being owned by their professional wrestling puppets.
	You know, that's the other thing. How appropriate for Trump and Tucker to go to a professional wrestling event Match at Madison Square Garden.
	And get a hero's welcome.
	Because that's what they are.
	They're professional wrestlers.
	The very place where this league, where they were brought in as guests, that league just saved Bud Light.
	And all these people who hate Bud Light, they're cheering on, you know, Trump and Tucker.
	And buying tickets to the people who just saved Bud Light and the whole transgender thing.
	And they're cheering on the people who lied to them.
	Tucker lied to make tens of millions of dollars there at Fox News.
	Trump who made the jab and all the rest of this stuff.
	Just amazing to see that.
	We have to have some kind of a remembrance about what happened.
	And I'm sorry if I keep looking backwards, but you know what?
	If we don't understand what was done to us in our recent past, these people are pushing this down the memory hole.
	And I'm not going to let it be pushed down the memory hole.
	I'm going to keep talking about it until people understand what's going on.
	Because we've had these vaccines and the damage done to them has been pushed down to children.
	The murder of children for the longest time has been pushed down the memory hole.
	We had on some of the comments that we didn't get to the other day, and I thought were really good.
	One person said, my aunt, this is good footprints.
	My aunt works in a hospital.
	Confirmed that they got extra money for COVID-related treatments.
	Yeah, I know. It was the American Hospital Association complaining about it to CMS, the Social Security and Medicare people.
	Another person replied that, said, I have a nurse friend who made $500,000 last year because of this.
	Yeah, they can buy people off with this funny money.
	And of course, it's Wall Street as well.
	Yeah, they can run on for a long time.
	They can continue to operate at a loss.
	You know, you look at Moderna.
	They were in operation for 10 years before Fauci got them brought in with the warp speed stuff.
	And they'd never had a product.
	But they kept selling happy stories on Wall Street.
	And you know, the whole way the stock market is set up, these people can lose money forever.
	Because there's always a greater fool out there who's going to buy the latest story about how they've got some new miracle cure that's in the pipeline that's going to be released.
	So somebody buys their stock and their stock keeps going up and they can buy and sell that stock and it's the same as being able to print money at the Federal Reserve.
	I watched that happen with Blockbuster.
	You know, we got into the video business And Blockbuster got big, and the guy who made it big, Wayne Huizinga, I think he owned the Dolphins or something, but he also had like waste management industries.
	There was one, you know, they came up with a concept, kind of like McDonald's, you know, you had a McDonald's restaurant, the guy, the Kroc brothers had a proof of concept, I think they were, no, Ray Kroc, was he the guy, Ray Kroc was the guy that bought it from the McDonald's brothers, anyway.
	But then, you know, somebody buys it and then makes it into a big franchise.
	Same thing happened with Blockbuster.
	And then, you know, he was operating it and it was profitable for him, but he operated it for a few years.
	And then he sold it to Viacom, which owns Paramount Movie Studios and CBS and all this big entertainment conglomerate.
	And Viacom was able to operate Blockbuster for several decades, losing money every single year, just like Moderna lost money every single year.
	These people can keep this stuff going indefinitely through the stock market.
	It truly is amazing.
	Handy says, David, there is no such thing as safe medication and pharmaceuticals.
	There's only less dangerous things.
	That's right. There's always a risk when introducing a foreign anything into the body, and that's why I'm a very conservative medic.
	If I give you a medication, it's truly a life-and-death decision, and it's always a risk-benefit decision.
	Yeah, I've got really pretty high blood pressure, and I was on lisinopril, which gave me a cough, and so I got off of it.
	It really wasn't making that much of a difference anyway.
	So we went to establish having a GP there as part of that quote-unquote wellness thing.
	He wants to put me on a different blood pressure medication.
	I looked up the adverse effects, and it is contraindicated for certain types of things that he doesn't know if I have those things or not.
	And I don't know if I've got them.
	So it's like, I'm not taking that stuff.
	I keep getting phone calls from the pharmacy.
	We got your prescription. I should let them know I'm not coming.
	They're all aborted fetus cells, too.
	Yes. Forced cannibalism.
	Satanism. Yeah. And again, we haven't talked about the ethical issues of this.
	For quite some time. And that was always there.
	Always there, the essence of this.
	And also, the ethical and religious things.
	Training people for a global government, for a mark of the government ID, in order to be able to buy, trade, and sell, and everything.
	The principle of that, and how they're escalating that, you know, Of course, that's been around with things like Social Security and things that they were doing with driver's licenses and stuff like that and real ID. But this is, you know, getting so, so close to it.
	And it is training for that as well, as well as training for universal basic income and all the rest of everything about it.
	That was a preparation for their globalist plans.
	And our guest is going to be joining us in about a half hour to talk about that.
	Control of Garx is the book.
	And we'll be talking to him in just a little bit.
	Mo says, my own brother acknowledged how his dog's behavior changes after getting vaccinated, yet he still condones that.
	Yeah, we had a scout nearly died because of what the doctor was doing.
	He was attacked, tore up his leg, skin started turning black, so the doctor just cut off all the skin, both sides of his leg.
	And thought he was going to lose his leg, and I think he went too far.
	But, you know, he had to be housed there, and they started feeding him junk food.
	He couldn't get exercise because of his leg.
	He got fat, but then they gave him every vaccine they could think of.
	He's had nothing but allergies since then.
	It's just horrible what they do.
	And we see this happening with animals.
	They are the canary in the coal mine.
	If we can't figure this out.
	And of course, he didn't ask us about that.
	He just did it, of course.
	We'll be right back. Analyzing
	The Globalist Next Move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	Looking for better information?
	APSRadioNews.com features articles and commentary, along with audio from all the top news from around the world.
	Alright, and I want to thank some of the supporters, because folks, if it wasn't for your support, we would not be able to do this.
	And I mentioned the fact that, for the love of the road, got me on the kids' meal for Tony.
	And I thought you'd be interested in seeing what is in the package here.
	Besides the gold or silver that comes in a couple of pieces here.
	But besides that, for the kids...
	They have a wise wolf keychain that's got a flashlight in it that kids will enjoy.
	And a wolf coloring thing for them as well.
	I thought that was really clever.
	I think that's a great thing that Tony's doing.
	Teaching your kids. At first, they're going to be more interested in the flashlight and the coloring thing.
	But it's also got a magnifying glass here on the side of it as well.
	The little keychain thing.
	But they're going to get more.
	It's a way to teach them. Some saving and how important that is and to actually save money instead of fiat currency.
	So thank you for the support.
	And again, for the love of the roads, always been a Subscribestar supporter for a very long time.
	I appreciate that as well.
	Ronald sent a check and said, I couldn't get any donation to you any other way.
	He said, not through Zelle and not on Cash App.
	We're still having problems with Cash App.
	And I hear that about Zelle every once in a while, but we do, we don't get much on Cash App.
	Very little, occasionally we get something there.
	It's usually from somebody who has given us something in the past.
	Karen spent a lot of time with them on the phone and got no resolution as to why it's not showing up.
	People have taken screenshots and sent it to us.
	You know, they type it in exactly right.
	It says, no, and it'll say things like, the person has to accept it and things like that.
	It's like, no, I'm not getting any message about it.
	But anyway, so thank you very much, Ronald.
	Thank you so much for the support and also for going to the trouble to keep trying different ways to contribute to us.
	Again, we're talking about Peter Thiel, founder of PayPal and everything.
	We began the program with some people sending me some money the day after I got fired.
	And it was on PayPal.
	I didn't have a PayPal account at the time.
	And they just sent it to the email address.
	And so we looked into it and got that set up.
	And the person just did it as a test.
	And And so I replied, I said, thanks.
	And, you know, we got it. And then they sent more money than other people started sending money.
	And we were getting almost all of our donations on PayPal.
	And then they just cut us off in May without any explanation.
	PayPal and Venmo just shut everything down.
	So, you know, we are where we are.
	And we trust God to provide for us.
	And we appreciate and cannot thank you enough for your generosity because it is out of your heart that you do this.
	And so we really do appreciate that.
	And I want to thank some of the people who have sent things via check.
	Anthony T. Marty K. Marilyn B. Anna Maria A. Joel B. Teal C. Two checks.
	Also William M. Two checks since I last read this.
	Mary N, Supra Faye, Martin T, Tina, and Michael G, Walter Y, and Timur R. And I keep saying the same names there.
	It's just, you know, people who have been real heroes to support us.
	If we could get this broader, and again, if people would...
	Like the show, pass it around.
	Maybe we can get a larger base of support.
	You know, if people can put aside $5 a month, the number of people that download this, that would be more than we needed, actually.
	But very few people support us.
	A few people who do support us heavily, so I appreciate that.
	Thank you, all of you. B Slice, thank you very much on Rumble, right?
	That Rumble? Thank you for the tip.
	said, David, I get upset when people like Bobby Kennedy and others claim they are not anti-vaxxers.
	They throw all of us under the bus.
	They undermine the good people in this fight.
	That's right.
	It is about the labels, isn't it?
	And RFKJ is playing some interesting games, isn't he?
	We might get to that in terms of how he's showing up in the polls and people saying, how is it going to affect things?
	Well, I know something about ballot access.
	I've been involved in that.
	And I think that he could have a big effect in some strategic places.
	I There's absolutely no way he's going to get on the ballot in 50 states.
	I absolutely almost bet it.
	I have a high confidence that he's not going to get on the ballot everywhere.
	And so I don't think he's going to win.
	But he could cause other people to lose by being on the ballot.
	But I want to talk about what's going on in Australia.
	Because as the show was ending yesterday...
	Oh, and Amos Poole. Thank you very much, Amos.
	Another familiar name I see all the time.
	Thank you very much. He says, for your high blood pressure, try spending an hour a day barefoot on the earth.
	Also, turn off the Wi-Fi while sleeping.
	Yeah, I try to do that.
	I only got an hour today, a day to spare.
	I should do something to relax every once in a while.
	That's part of the reason, you know, the sleep and the stress is one of the reasons why my blood pressure is high.
	I haven't been able to find any way to get around that.
	As the show was closing yesterday, Harps in Australia said, David, four of our major ports are shut off from a hack on Friday, but the Chinese-owned Darwin ports are still open.
	I wonder what could be happening with that, but I had not seen anything about that, so thanks, Harps, for letting me know.
	I looked it up, and it's not being covered in the U.S. media, although it is a pretty big deal.
	Australia locks down ports after a nationally significant Cyberattack.
	That's how it was described.
	It looks like these ports, from what I could tell, all belonged to a Dubai-based company called DP World.
	And so, the Australian ports are being owned by this Dubai company, or China, or whatever.
	The operator shut down four ports.
	At Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, and Fremantle, after detecting a cybersecurity incident late on Friday night, DP World is responsible for 40% of Australia's maritime freight.
	So that's a big deal, cutting them off from the world.
	And of course, they can't export anything or import anything.
	They're not allowing them to take things on or off of the ships.
	Our teams are working diligently to contain the situation and to determine the impact on our systems and our data.
	They don't say it in any of these articles, but I'm guessing that it's the same type of thing that we saw with Continental Pipeline The biggest pipeline on the East Coast here in the U.S., they didn't do anything to actually affect the physical pipeline.
	You can still deliver oil and all the rest of that stuff.
	They didn't shut down any valves or anything like that.
	However, if you just shut down somebody's financial system and they can't process payments and things like that, it all shuts down.
	And I'm assuming that that's what happened with these ports in Australia as well.
	And I think it's interesting because these virtual attacks...
	Always hit the accounting.
	They always hit the financial side of things, don't they?
	And here you have virtual attacks on, again, the financial stuff, I think, which is happening here.
	What does that say about CBDC? The cybersecurity incident follows a cyber attack on Melbourne's cryptocurrency exchange, CoinSpot, which saw more than $2 million taken away from accounts.
	You see, this is what bothers me.
	You have, and I know, you know, you don't leave your money at a, you know, with any of these places.
	You know, you leave it in your wallet.
	But still...
	There was, and I forget the billionaire's name, but he had nearly a million dollars stolen out of his wallet, not taken out of a crypto exchange.
	And he didn't know it.
	Somebody else told him about it.
	So that means that A, his wallet is not private.
	And B, he didn't even know somebody had stolen a million dollars from him.
	Until this guy saw, you know, he's watching, you know, looking for big transactions, you know, something that a whale would do or something like that, as they call it.
	And so he sees a big transaction coming across because everybody can monitor that.
	He looked it up and he was able to find out who that wallet belonged to.
	And he calls the billionaire up and he says, what, you just had a million, did you know about this?
	No, I didn't know about it.
	So that's what scares me about the crypto stuff.
	It's one of the reasons why. Tony Arterman's Wise Wolf Gold, as I pointed out.
	Ryan, thank you for that.
	And we also have another listener who faithfully sends us stuff from that.
	But again, having...
	Real money that you really hold.
	And of course, you know, thieves can break in and steal stuff, and you can have moths can eat your clothes, as Jesus told us.
	So you store up your treasure in heaven.
	But, you know, nothing is safe here.
	But, you know, there's different levels of risk.
	And I think it's a much more risky thing to have it there online because everybody is getting cyber attacks.
	I mean, we've had our intelligence agencies have been attacked and hacked and had all their stuff stolen and exposed to the world as well.
	Pentagon, the NSA, the CIA, all these people have been hacked.
	And all these big companies.
	I don't have an IT department to protect me having my stuff online.
	So, again, that can happen anywhere.
	One of Australia's port operators is now back online.
	After the cyber attack crippled its facilities.
	And again, this is owned by the government of Dubai.
	Not just a private individual there, but the government of Dubai owns these ports.
	DP World is owned by the government.
	And they've got four of these ports.
	Forty percent of everything that comes in and out of Australia is controlled by the Dubai government.
	And of course, the Chinese government is there as well.
	They said they've not yet identified the purpose of the cyber attack caused the firm to disconnect its ports from the internet.
	All this sounds like it was some kind of a financial thing at the root of it.
	Cyber attack added to fears that the supply of everything from medical equipment to Christmas toys could be disrupted in Australia.
	And of course, when we look at some other problems in tech utopia, in South Korea, a robot slaughtered a man.
	I like this headline. A robot slaughters a South Korean man after mistaking him for a box of paprika.
	That's pretty accurately what actually happened.
	Most people don't put it that way.
	And South Korea, they were early on warning about We're good to go.
	Figured him for a box of vegetables and then seized him using its arms and tongs, and after grabbing the technician, the robot apparently smashed him against the conveyor belt.
	An official from the agricultural complex said the company had come to rely upon robots more and humans less, and that the accident occurred after the facility attempted to make robots more efficient.
	They said a precise and safe system must be established.
	You would think so, right?
	On account of South Korea's dwindling workforce, robots, smart and dumb, we could also add, I guess, and dangerous, have become ubiquitous.
	Again, it's a declining population.
	This is one of the things that Elon Musk is talking about.
	Oh, well, we're going to have to have all these robots out there because he said, no, it's not really going to take your jobs.
	We just have this declining population.
	Robot waiters, robot chefs, introduced four years ago, now in restaurants across South Korea.
	Robotic chefs can apparently fry 50 chickens an hour, or they can cook up spicy rice cakes for five people in under 10 minutes.
	And so the question is, who's going to buy the food if nobody's got jobs?
	Remember, this is the antithesis of what Henry Ford said.
	Henry Ford said, well, I'm going to, you know, setting up the assembly line, a mass production, I'm going to make the cars cheap enough that my workers can afford to own them.
	That's not the aspiration of any car company, not even necessarily the aspiration of the restaurants.
	Right? You know, who's going, if nobody's got a job, then who is going to buy the food?
	I don't necessarily believe that they are not looking to take away everybody's job.
	I think that's the whole point of universal basic income.
	And I think Elon Musk knows that as well because that was the issue.
	In the 2016 election with Andrew Yang I think was his name.
	I'm starting to forget about him now.
	His sole issue at the beginning was UBI and he got a lot of support from Elon Musk.
	I got him to agree to come on the program until he actually looked me up and he canceled at the last minute.
	International Federation of Robotics, South Korea, fourth largest robot maker in the world.
	They have a thousand robots installed per 10,000 employees.
	In other words, one out of every, for every 10 employees, they got a robot.
	And they have the highest industrial robot density in the world by a big margin because, you know, people are not essential.
	And the question is, you know, if you get this, even if these restaurants stay in business because of universal welfare, universal basic income, and if people can take their little, you know, welfare check and go down to the restaurant and buy it, and it's all robotics...
	Who's to say that these people aren't going to, at some point in time, say, well, I'm sorry, but you small businesses are not essential?
	Because we've already did that. We did that exercise in 2020.
	We had it done by Trump.
	Sorry, you're too small.
	You're not essential. We're going to shut you down, one way or the other.
	They can find a way to do it, regulatory ways or other ways to do it.
	China is calling for more and more robotics.
	They're centrally planned...
	Technology, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the central planners there, say that we've got to mass-produce human-like robots, and we've got to do it within two years.
	So it's going to be the new engine for growth.
	So we're going to be roboting Peter in order to pay Paul, right?
	Or to pay Elon, I guess.
	But the question is, the big part of the China price has always been slave labor.
	And of course, that's what robot means.
	It's the Czech word for slavery.
	And so we've got a guest who's going to be joining us pretty soon.
	He just released the book today, so I'm sure he's backed up with a lot of interviews.
	So we're going to go to him early in about five minutes.
	So he'll be here before the beginning of the hour.
	But his book released today, and I'm sure he's got a lot of interviews.
	So we're happy to have him, and we're going to be going to that in just a few minutes.
	But when you look at this, you know, China doesn't have enough slaves.
	China, the second most populous country in the world.
	China that has made its mark by enslaving these people and paying them nothing.
	Slave labor was a big part of the China price, along with Piracy, copyright violation, and currency manipulation, those are the three biggies of what made China competitive, the China price.
	But even with that, China says, well, we've got to control and get rid of the humans, and we need mechanical slaves instead of human slaves.
	And this is all coming from the usual central planners.
	This is how important it is to these people.
	While we're waiting for our guest to come on, we've had a lot of negative news all the time, sad news, and I wanted to give you an uplifting story that I was really blessed by.
	It's a story about Art Garfunkel and his blind friend and how it all fed into the sound of silence.
	And what is happening is his friend, they were friends in college, his friend is releasing his memoir and it tells this story.
	And he had actually inspired the lyrics and then was able to help Simon and Garfunkel Fund the album that basically was their hit.
	And that album was a failure, all the songs on it, except for this one song.
	And this song was really about their relationship.
	He said they met at Columbia University.
	He said, and he's now 79 years old.
	He said, Art Garfunkel really lifted me out of the grave after what happened to me.
	We met. He said, I saw a young man wearing an argyle sweater, corduroy pants, blonde hair, crew cut, came over and said, Hi, I'm Arthur Garfunkel.
	And he said, every night, Arthur and I would sing.
	He would play his guitar.
	I would be the DJ. The air was always filled with music.
	Still teenagers, they made a pact to always be there for each other in times of trouble.
	If one was in a difficult time, the other would come to his rescue.
	Some months later, he said, I was at a baseball game and suddenly my eyes became cloudy and my vision became unhinged.
	And shortly after that, darkness descended, he said.
	The doctor said it was conjunctivitis and assuring him that it would pass.
	However, a few days later, he went totally blind.
	And they realized that glaucoma had destroyed his optic nerves.
	Sandy was his name.
	He's from a Jewish immigrant in Buffalo, New York, son of a rag and bone man, as he put it.
	And they were poor.
	They didn't have any money to help him.
	So he had to quit college and he gave up his dream of becoming a lawyer.
	And he plunged into deep depression.
	He said, I wouldn't see anyone.
	I just refuse to talk to anybody.
	And then unexpectedly, Arthur, Garfunkel, flew in and said he had to talk to me.
	He said, you're going to come back, aren't you?
	I said, no, there's no conceivable way.
	And he was pretty insistent.
	Finally said, look, I don't think you get it.
	I need you back here. This is a pack we made together.
	And so he said he got him to come back.
	He said he was dependent on Garfunkel for support.
	He'd walk him to class.
	He'd bandage his wounds when he fell.
	He also filled out his graduate school applications.
	And Garfunkel called himself darkness in a show of empathy.
	He said, I was telling him, I want to be where you are in the black.
	He said, the darkness is going to read to you now.
	And then he'd take me to class, back and forth.
	Then one day, when they were in Grand Central Station, and he was guiding him around, Garfunkel said, I've got to leave for an assignment.
	And he said he left me alone.
	He said it was horrible. He said, I was terrified.
	I stumbled. I fell, cut my forehead.
	I cut my shins. My socks were bloodied.
	I had my hands out, bumped into a woman's breast.
	He said, it was a horrendous feeling of shame, humiliation.
	I started running forward, knocking over coffee cups and briefcases.
	Finally, I got to the local train at Columbia University, the worst couple of hours of my life.
	And he said, however, when he got back to campus, and he bumped into a man, and he apologized, and it was Arthur.
	I recognized his voice, he said.
	For a moment, I was enraged, and then I understood what had happened.
	That it was, he did this deliberately, and he said he'd been there with me the entire time.
	And he said he knew that I had to prove to myself that I could do some of this stuff on my own.
	And you know, I thought about that, and I thought, what a picture of Christ that is, isn't it?
	You know, we go through these difficult times.
	Sometimes we get angry with God.
	Then eventually we realize that He was there all the time.
	And so, the phrase was, he would say, hi, I am darkness.
	And when they did their song, and they wanted to release their album, they didn't have any money.
	He said, by that time, he was married, and he had a job.
	He said, we only had $404 in our current account.
	Art needed $400 to do the album.
	And so, he wrote him a check.
	And this is what came out.
	This was the hit, the only hit on the album and the thing that made Simon and Garfunkel stars.
	Hello darkness my old friend I've come to talk with you again Because a vision softly creeping Left its seas while I was sleeping And the vision that was planted in my brain still remains within the sound of
	silence. The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	Thank you.
	Bruner, and he's got a book that is releasing today.
	as a matter of fact. Really happy to have him on.
	The book is Controllogarchs, Exposing the Billionaire Class, Their Secret Deals, and the Globalist Plot to Dominate Your Life.
	And that's being released today.
	So I'm really excited to talk to him.
	Thank you for joining us, Seamus.
	Appreciate it. It's a pleasure to be with you, David.
	So tell us a little bit about this.
	I know I've seen several of your articles on Breitbart.
	They've been talking quite a bit about control of GARCs.
	And you've been talking about the research that you've uncovered about these guys, Gates, Zuckerberg, and all the rest of these people.
	What is it that they want from us?
	Just total control, isn't it?
	Yeah, that's right. I work with a guy named Peter Schweitzer at the Government Accountability Institute.
	And our motto there is, follow the money.
	And I've been with Schweitzer for 10 years, following the money to the politicians.
	We exposed the insider trading in Congress, where the members would be trading stocks on bills that would affect their bottom line, essentially.
	We did Clinton Cash and Bush Bucks.
	We're non-partisan, so we like to go after both sides.
	I remember, yeah. When you go after these guys, you've got a target-rich environment, don't you?
	When you follow on the money, it's everywhere.
	With this project, we followed it all the way to the top.
	You get into Bill Gates and Zuckerberg and the World Economic Forum in Davos, and there's a lot of conspiracy theories.
	You've really got to sift through the fact and the fiction.
	Bill Gates is buying farmland because he wants to grow food to poison you.
	That's not what we allege or have found here.
	But what we have found is that key industries that affect every aspect of your life, whether it's food, health, the financial sector, there's things coming that are kind of frightening.
	It's not conspiracy theory.
	Yeah.
	They are trying to control everything.
	And I was just talking earlier about both Bill Gates move into health care and data mining for health care and the same time that people in the UK are very concerned about the NHS because of Palantir and Peter Thiel and how they're getting involved in the data aspect of the health care because that's going to be a big leverage for them to get that that data to get involved at the ground level with health care.
	And it all really ties together.
	All this stuff ties together with Bill Gates desire to give people IDs.
	I saw this in India as with the odd heart system where you get an ID and they're going to be able to get welfare and you'll be able to get health care.
	And so it gives them leverage and control, but it also helps them with a government as well.
	It seems like it's kind of a public-private partnership, isn't it, that they have with these governments, making themselves as stakeholders in all this.
	Yeah, that's exactly right.
	We examine the digital ID. We examine the public-private partnerships.
	And the thing about the public-private partnerships is it's essentially taxpayers subsidize any losses, but then men like Bill Gates privatize all of the gains.
	And so it's really an unfair system for people like you and me who are not cut in on these new healthcare things.
	And we're talking trillions of dollars.
	I mean, whether it's the energy industry, And his nuclear power company, or it's the food industry and a lot of these alternative protein companies, the healthcare industry, of course.
	So many, many trillions of dollars are at stake here, and it's just a few players.
	And when we look at it, one of the things that people have talked about for a long time is Bill Gates and the eugenics race.
	It seems to me like that also ties in with the climate agenda as well.
	Because I remember, I'm old enough to remember the first Earth Day, and I remember what preceded it, Paul Ehrlich and his population bomb.
	This has always been about population control, and that's one aspect of it.
	But there's also the eugenics aspect of it that you cover.
	Tell us a little bit about that from your perspective.
	Right. People hear the word eugenics and it harkens back to like Nazi scientists and it's kind of, you know, that sounds nutty, but indeed they are funding this CRISPR-Cas9 research where you'll be able to select the traits of your offspring.
	whether it's choosing the eye color.
	And they're working closely with China, which is a really big threat.
	I mean, you see that, of course, with the Wuhan lab tinkering with viruses.
	Well, they're also tinkering with genetics.
	And China has claimed to have genetically modified a human.
	And we're just really on the precipice here of kind of a scary time.
	And the problem here is that these are not elected officials.
	Bill Gates was not elected, the World Economic Forum.
	They're not elected, and therefore they're basically unaccountable.
	And of course, they do have this desire.
	It gets to the point, I think, when they have so much money.
	That it really becomes more about power, and as you point out, more about control.
	The money kind of loses, you kind of keep score with the money, but that's not really what these guys are after at this point in time.
	You know, a normal person...
	After you get a couple billion dollars, you just kind of relax and enjoy life or something.
	But these people are driven. You know, no matter how much money they've got, they've got to have more.
	It's like an addiction that they have.
	But that essentially serves their desire, I think, for power.
	And so I think that's why, you know, you really nailed it with the controller guards.
	That is what they're fundamentally looking for.
	When you look at how they are putting this together and how it is kind of a public-private partnership and a stakeholder thing, I've said in the past that, you know, we see these agendas coming out of places like, you know, the UN or the World Economic Forum, Davos or Bilderberg or whatever.
	They're putting together these agendas and everything, but they need to have money because right now they don't have a way to tax people globally.
	They're working on that with the carbon taxes and things.
	But, you know, if you're going to have a world governance, you're going to have to have a kind of public-private partnership at this point in time.
	And so these people are really, I think, kind of what's hidden in their stakeholder aspect that, you know, if I get a stake in the future world government by helping you to fund this and helping to implement this, I'm going to make money off of it, but the payoff is going to come down the line.
	Is that the way you see it when you look at this?
	Because you're looking at this in a lot more depth.
	Yeah, that's absolutely right.
	I mean, a lot of people ask me, well, aren't these guys capitalists?
	And what problem do you have with capitalism?
	And I would say none. But these are not really capitalists like we think of capitalism.
	It's a totally different thing.
	Klaus Schwab calls it stakeholder capitalism.
	And the funny thing about, you know, when you read Klaus Schwab's writings on stakeholder capitalism, one of the key stakeholders you don't often see him mention are the people.
	It's all, you know, it's NGOs and business leaders and, you know, government officials.
	But yeah, it's the public-private partnership model, which sounds rather benign.
	It's really not, though, because the public doesn't get a say in any of it.
	And as far as money and capitalization, I mean, we followed the money, we crunched all the figures of the foundations and found that there's more than $10 trillion just in the top 25 of hundreds World Economic Forum members.
	This is the largest corporations in the world.
	Yeah, yeah, it truly is amazing.
	You talk about the war on farmers, and you said, you know, a lot of people think that, uh, uh, misconstrue what, uh, Gates's, um, uh, motives are in this.
	How do you see the war on farmers?
	Well, I see the war on farmers like a lot of these other industries too, which is it's about patents and it's about the control of intellectual property.
	If you think of food like a pharmaceutical product where the name brand drug comes out, it's very expensive, let's say $80 a pill.
	Whereas then it goes generic.
	Well, a patent grants you a 20-year monopoly.
	It's the same thing with food.
	They are patenting the seeds, they are patenting the protein chains of these products like Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods.
	And so once you've secured the patents on the alternative proteins, then you move to ban the competition, which is the generic, which is cattle.
	And so when, let's say, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Representative Cortez, when she says the Earth is going to end in 12 years because cow flatulence, she didn't just dream that up somewhere.
	It came out of a white paper from, let's say, an organization like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
	Yeah, yeah. I call her occasional cortex.
	Occasionally she gets it right, but not too often.
	But yeah, it is a strategy to come up with something that is new and novel, and then to get them to ban what is currently working.
	And we see that everywhere. I mean, just take a look at cars in general.
	You know, when you look at what is happening in the EV industry, Clearly, customers are not there.
	They're not on board with this stuff, and they don't want it.
	It's really being shoved down people's throats, and the government is going to aid them by banning it.
	But these people are playing the long game.
	They don't even call themselves car companies anymore.
	They call themselves mobility companies because they're looking to get into that franchise that's down the road.
	And so that's a pattern that you see as well, right, with Gates and these other people, that they're working on having some kind of a quasi-oligarchy where they're going to own transportation or they're going to own food or pharmaceuticals or whatever, and they're going to continue that they're working on having some kind of a quasi-oligarchy where they're going to own transportation or they're going to own food
	That is the end goal, as stated at the World Economic Forum, and they state it quite joyfully, is that you will own nothing and you will be happy.
	And what that really means is, yes, exactly like you said, a nation, a world of renters.
	I kind of describe it as like putting a paywall around your life or making life subscription-based.
	Yeah. You see this with vehicles right now.
	I mean, BMW and Mercedes have now made features on their cars.
	You know, the best automobile makers, the Germans, have made certain features, like if you would like to have the safety assist or if you want to have heated seats in your vehicle, you've got to pay $10 a month.
	And you kind of see it with more and more products.
	I mean, everything's becoming subscription-based.
	Yeah, there was actually a Babylon Bee thing where they were talking about signing up for Pfizer Plus, you know, instead of Disney Plus, where you get your boosters on a monthly basis.
	Everybody's got a plus.
	So, you know, when you look at this, one of the things you say is the left's rise is no accident.
	How do you see the left's role in this?
	I just talked on Friday to Xi Van Fleet, who talked about growing up in Mao's China, and she's freaked out about how she sees Marxism being implemented exactly the same way that it was when she was a child in school, and the schools acting many of the same ways.
	Of course, the substances of it is different, but it is still working the same way.
	And so she looks at it and she says, well...
	I don't really want to call these people woke.
	I mean, it is Marxism, but actually, you know, in Marxism, they were talking about an awakening, you know, in China.
	That's actually the term that they use.
	So in a sense, they're using even the woke term as something that they borrowed from the Chinese.
	But how do you see this in terms of the rise of the left?
	And I guess, you know, maybe even the march through the institutions.
	Yeah, that's exactly right. I hadn't heard about that with the woke.
	That's very interesting. So, I mean, everybody has heard of George Soros, a perennial boogeyman.
	But he, I mean, as you see, he's funding these radical left groups.
	I mean, even these pro-Hamas groups, George Soros funded, I think, $23 million to those.
	But it goes back to the 50s and 60s.
	And there was actually a former FBI agent published, you may have seen this, the Communist Party's Global goals and there's about 50 goals and I published those in the book and you read through those and it's just shocking to see how many of those goals have really come to fruition and so you see along the way these these left-wing groups that have been funded they're actually funded by elite wealthy interests I mean George Soros of course but then you see I mean like the BLM movement and that gets big funding from Amazon
	you see it a lot in the LGBT movement there's these corporate interests and Which seems counterintuitive, right?
	Because Marxism, you know, you would think a capitalist corporation would not be in favor of it.
	But time and again, you know, you follow the money and there they are.
	So what do you think of that?
	You know, what do you think of these people who seem to be capitalists and yet they're hardcore Marxists?
	And as you point out, they're funding these organizations that have a Marxist agenda in that.
	You know, what is really going on?
	Is this just a bait and switch?
	And how did they get into this position?
	How do we wind up Having all these people with all the money, if you're following the money, how'd they get all the money in control of all our institutions so they could destroy them?
	Well, and it's this alliance of the state and with the corporations, just like you see in China.
	The state-run capitalism model is the model that the guys in Silicon Valley, they really like that model.
	Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum actually had a great hand in creating that model going back to the 70s.
	And World Economic Forum economists were going into China before Deng Xiaoping and teaching them the benefits of capitalism.
	But Klaus Schwab says, you know, the state-run model where you actually have this sort of autocratic authoritarian element to it, where you see when Bill Gates praises China's lockdowns during COVID.
	I do see, you know, countless, there are countless examples of where, let's say, Mark Zuckerberg, he keeps Xi Jinping's writings on his desk.
	So they sort of have this lust for the Chinese model.
	Yeah. And that is really what stakeholder capitalism, what Klaus Schwab calls stakeholder capitalism is.
	It's a merger of the corporate interests.
	I mean, Mussolini, I believe, called it fascism when the corporations in the state are merged.
	But that's what they're working towards.
	And it has been that way.
	If you want to do business in China, you've got to have a Chinese partner, which is going to be somebody that's going to be a high-ranking official or more in the Chinese Communist Party.
	And so it really is a form of fascism, of economic and political merging that is there.
	And so this was so confusing to a lot of people.
	They have these categories that they want to put everything into, and they've got to shuffle this around.
	You know, the Chinese Communist Party is really fascist.
	They have this economic fascism.
	They're also hyper-nationalist as well.
	And then there's these capitalists that we have in America who are Marxist in their orientation.
	But we can see that ultimately we need to start rethinking what our political map is and start just referring to these people as totalitarians, I think, right?
	Yeah, or controller guards.
	That's exactly what it is.
	It's all about control. They love the efficiency of being able to, let's say, stifle descent and just cancel you.
	Yeah, and we have seen that, as you point out, Zuckerberg's got the...
	The writing says, we've seen these politicians, we've seen everybody from George W. Bush to Trudeau saying, I wish I could be like the Chinese leader and just tell people what to do.
	And it's just this totalitarian urge that they have.
	A few years ago, I remember, I think it was Newsweek or Time, they did a cover of Zuckerberg, who is just infatuated with Caesar Augustus.
	And even, I think, named his daughter Augustus or something.
	But, you know, he's got this desire to rule the world.
	He already tried doing it with his white paper for Libra.
	He was going to say, hey, let me do the CBDC for the world, and it'll be a de facto global ID for you.
	How about that? And they rejected that because they're going to roll their own.
	But all that rolls together.
	When we talk about following the money, that's really where we're ultimately going with all this stuff.
	It all really does converge with financial controls.
	And it converges with CBDC and universal basic income, doesn't it?
	Yeah, that's exactly right.
	I mean, on Zuckerberg and just the tech oligarchs in general, I believe the professor at MIT's name is Joseph Wiesenbaum.
	He lays out why these guys have sort of a God complex on steroids.
	It's because the tech developers and the computer programmers, they construct these worlds of, you know, digital worlds.
	When they turn the dials in their digital worlds, all of the moving parts do what the designer wants them to.
	They try to bring that ability into the real world.
	They think if they can turn the right dials, they can fix humanity.
	David, you may not think you have any problems that need fixing, but they do.
	You've got a lot of big problems that they need to fix.
	And so on the CBDC front, I mean, yeah, that's another one where I thought, you know, some of the things I'm reading about this sound sort of conspiratorial.
	What do you mean they can just turn off your money?
	But indeed, the World Economic Forum was one of the leaders and, you know, Promoting CBDCs.
	I mean, the central banks are fully behind it.
	The Bank of International Settlements has had meetings on how to bring these about.
	Just last week, the Atlantic Council said that the, quote, momentum behind CBDCs remains strong.
	And so they're planning to roll that out.
	Also last week, Bill Gates and the United Nations hosted an event that was titled 50 in 50, which 50 countries within five years will have digital ID according to the UN and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation who co-sponsored the event.
	So it's full steam ahead on CBDC and digital ID. And once linked, I mean, all of your transactions...
	Much more closely can be tracked and traced.
	I mean, the abolition of cash, you see a lot of countries in Europe are becoming increasingly, increasingly cashless.
	I mean, even we in America, our resistance to going cashless has about halved in 20 years.
	Yes, yes, yeah.
	And, you know, part of that is, you know, the convenience and the comfort.
	Just make it easier for people to pay electronically or tap and go and that type of thing.
	And they just had Australia just went down.
	Their tap and go system went down because the telecom company went down.
	And nobody had cash.
	And so it's like, what do we do now?
	It really does create a control point.
	I remember when the CEO of Uber proudly showed to a member of the press, he said, this is our God view.
	And they could look at where all of the different Uber things were happening, but he called it his God view.
	And that really is the way they see themselves, as incomplete control, the contrologarchs.
	And then, of course, there's also the transhumanist and other aspects of this.
	These guys really do think that Their technology is not only going to provide endless material goods for us, but they think it's going to provide a way for them to live forever, don't they?
	Well, did you get into any of that? I know that's not really necessarily in the line of the money stuff, but this whole idea, Peter Thiel with the singularity and Elon Musk and his Neuralink and all the rest of this stuff, I mean, they're moving into merging with machines and they think that's going to let them live forever.
	That's another part of their God complex, I think.
	Exactly right. It's in Chapter 9, the dystopian present.
	We've got Peter Thiel.
	Of course, we've got Elon Musk with Neuralink.
	And you're right.
	I mean, I don't state it as explicitly, but what it really is, is they want to live forever.
	And that's the thing. It's the one thing that unites us.
	I mean, what could... Any of us have in common with someone with a net worth of $200 billion, is that we're all going to die.
	And I think that scares people.
	That scares the billionaires.
	And they really hope that they...
	And they state it.
	They truly believe that in their lifetimes we'll be able to live forever.
	Elon Musk has claimed he's uploaded his brain to the cloud.
	I mean, I'm not sure if that's possible, but...
	He and Peter Thiel and Jeff Bezos is a big funder of life extension technologies.
	They always come up with these nice little euphemisms for it, but they're seeking immortality.
	It's kind of interesting. We always hear there's only two things that are inevitable, death and taxes.
	But of course, these guys already beat taxes, so I guess they can beat death as well, right?
	I'm borrowing that, David.
	That is perfect. Exactly.
	So, you know, when they look at this, again, they get, you know, instead of getting taxed, they get subsidized because they're doing what the government wants to do.
	It's kind of this symbiotic relationship between these two groups of parasites, the contrologarchs and the government.
	And, you know, they're feeding each other, but they're feeding off of us.
	When you look at this, and, you know, we've had...
	These guys literally talk about us being a virus.
	Talk a little bit about the disdain that they have for the average person that you notice in this.
	I mean, they really do.
	We've seen this in the Gaia theory where they say, you know, Mother Earth, Gaia, is this wonderful thing that happened by accident, and humans are a virus, and we've got to be controlled or even eliminated.
	I mean, how much of this is that kind of, you know, you talk about the eugenics race and everything, but I mean, is there still, At the core of this, this kind of depopulation move, kind of a hatred of mankind that is fundamentally there because they see us as less than them but still a threat to them.
	What do you think? 100%.
	The whole relationship with, I'm not, you know, if you're familiar with the Club of Rome, the Club of Rome was really the precursor organization to the World Economic Forum.
	Yes. It was, you know, the same members and it all came around.
	I mean, you mentioned Paul Ehrlich and the population bomb.
	This sounds like it's, you know, ancient history back in the 60s.
	But yes, The Limits to Growth, which is the book that was put out by the Club of Rome, It gets an update approximately every 10 years where they rejigger the algorithms in the computer and we're still going to end in 20 years.
	It's always 20 years away the Earth is going to end.
	And I think there was just last year an update to the limits to growth.
	Even though, and I lay this out in the book, the limits to growth was completely debunked, just like Paul Ehrlich's population bomb was completely debunked decades ago.
	The modeling was totally faulty.
	But anyway, the whole point of limits to growth was to say, yes, the Earth is overpopulated.
	A subsequent Club of Rome report came out, and it was called The Predicament of Mankind, and it essentially found that...
	We, the elites around the world, we need a common cause.
	Countries need a common cause to unite around.
	And the problem with the world is humanity itself.
	So they are anti-human.
	Not themselves, of course, just all of the people sharing their air.
	I opened the book in chapter one with this meeting of the Good Club.
	It was in May 2009.
	It was convened by Bill Gates, George Soros, David Rockefeller at Rockefeller University in Manhattan.
	What Oprah Winfrey was there.
	Ted Turner was there.
	And approximately 15 billionaires got together.
	And the context for this meeting is Barack Obama has just been elected president.
	They all spent great amounts of money to get him there.
	And so they have this meeting May 2009 and say, we need a common cause for which we, the more or less most powerful people in the country, can pool our resources.
	And this really precedes We're good to go.
	I do give Elon Musk some credit.
	Actually, no, the Earth is not overpopulated.
	And the one resource that they always, whether it's the Limits to Growth or Paul Ehrlich and the Population Bomb, the one resource that they failed to take into account is human ingenuity.
	We're not running out of resources.
	We always find a new way to gather resources.
	We'll never have a water problem on planet Earth.
	We just have a salt problem, as people have said.
	And they've found ways to desalinize the ocean.
	The peak oil was debunked 40, 50 years ago.
	They're now putting carbon scrubbers.
	I mean, trees breathe carbon, so I'm a little confused.
	What's the level of carbon that's too much if the trees and plants breathe carbon?
	But nonetheless, human ingenuity has come up with carbon scrubbers that are sucking the CO2 out of the atmosphere and cleaning things up.
	That's kind of scary. That almost looks like they're terraforming us, taking the CO2 out.
	But of course, now... No, no.
	Flipped completely around and said, no, we've got to cut the trees down after saying you've got to pay me to plant trees.
	Now we're going to cut the trees down and we're going to bury them.
	You can't even make wood out of them or anything.
	We're going to just bury them in the ground.
	And it reminds me very much of what I remember the first Earth Day.
	And, you know, they were telling everybody we were going to have a new ice age.
	And then all of a sudden, within eight years, it just flipped the script completely and it was going to be global warming.
	Now they're flipping the script on trees and CO2. It's absolutely insane, and yet they continually get away with it because they control the institutions.
	The government is showering them with cash and all the rest of this stuff.
	It truly is amazing how they can continue to keep running and keep reinventing these lies in completely opposite directions.
	It really is, and that comes down to the media control and the education control.
	I mean, there's a chapter on each, and the media is controlled by just six corporations.
	It's very hard. I mean, it's getting better now.
	There's podcasts and shows out there, and shows like yours are great sources of information that is not controlled, and free thinkers, and independent journalists such as myself putting out the The research.
	But they're struggling and working very hard to make sure that unapproved narratives are not allowed to get out there.
	So that's where the disinformation...
	I mean, nobody had ever heard the word disinformation five, ten years ago.
	And now it's everywhere.
	And same thing with hate speech.
	And so there's that.
	And then the control of the education.
	I mean, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation really started as the Gates Learning Center.
	And they want to get laptops in the hands of every child.
	Some of the software programs, they're programming the brains of your children.
	You should be very careful what the schools are putting into your kids' heads.
	I think that's become a big issue that people recognize.
	Information control is actually, in my opinion, probably the scariest one.
	We need to have the free flow of information.
	And I see them being more involved even in education than even in the media.
	I mean, what do you think about that?
	That's such a huge footprint that they have in education.
	It seems to be even bigger than it is in the media.
	I see the footprint of the pharmaceutical industry, for example, and all the commercials that they run.
	But, you know, when you look at Gates and the rest of these people, it seems like it's education where they're more focused on.
	Because that's where they get the kids so afraid of, you know, the world's going to end tomorrow, that type of thing.
	Or 20 years, you know.
	Right, right. I mean, that's absolutely right.
	I mean, you know, there's all of the communist dictators said, you know, you get to the kids first.
	And that's what we see happening in our school systems.
	And a lot of parents are alienated from their children based on what their children are learning in schools.
	And their kids are coming home and woke and calling their parents racist when they're not or whatever the case may be.
	And it's a big problem.
	I mean, we've probably lost a generation or two, but it also, I'm encouraged, you know, the younger generations are sort of resisting the top down.
	You know, that's one thing kids are always good at, is being rebellious.
	Once they become the establishment, then they've got a problem, right?
	So you've looked at this, and you've followed the money, and you see how these guys have gotten all the money.
	The controligarchs are controlling all the money for the most part, especially with the government.
	So how do we end this?
	Let's not talk about what the endgame of their plans are.
	Do you have any suggestions for what we do to end this controligarchy?
	When they've got the money and they've got the political power and stuff, what do we do about it?
	Yeah, that's right. I got to the end of the researching and the writing for this, and I was like, boy, the hardest thing to write is going to be the recommendations.
	I mean, we're up against trillions of dollars here.
	But, you know, in five words or so, I'd say do not comply is the first three when they come and try to force things upon you and, you know, with the mandates and whatnot.
	But the second is buying local.
	I mean, it seems very small.
	It's very hard, too. I mean, local.
	Can seem like it's daunting or buying local, is it more expensive?
	But I've found local farms that actually it's cheaper to get meat in bulk.
	I've got a freezer that you can buy local meats because you don't know when they're going to start putting the fake meats in the grocery store.
	I mean, they're already there with the Beyond Meats and such.
	But you've got to jealously guard your wallet.
	You've got to not be giving money in the form of subscriptions.
	It's easier said than done, of course.
	But then also, you've got to take an active interest and active role in your child's education and upbringing.
	I don't think we're going to defeat the control of Garx this year, next year even.
	But it's going to be a long slog.
	And you've got to take an active role in your child's education.
	Yeah, because it is the hearts and the minds.
	And that's really where the battle is going to be won or lost.
	And it's also going to be in the local communities.
	For all my life, as I said earlier in the show, I always heard, you know, thank you.
	Globally and act locally.
	That was always the left's mantra.
	We need to understand what these people are doing globally.
	That's what your book covers.
	What are these people up to?
	Where are they right now?
	What is their ultimate goal and plan?
	And then I think we need to understand that we have to act locally as well.
	And we have to act locally to counteract what that global plan is.
	But it helps to know what their plan is.
	It helps to know what their battle plan is.
	I mean, what an advantage that is to have the enemy's battle plans in your hands.
	And that's really what your book does.
	It really tells people what the battle plan is.
	And so even if you know what their plan is, it's still going to be difficult to defeat it.
	But it's going to be a lot easier to defeat it if you know what their tactics and their strategies and their ultimate goals are.
	And I think that's the key thing that your book brings to the table here.
	It's to show what these people have done and where they're headed.
	And it's important for this to get out to a lot of people because you point out, we talk to people about CBDC, they don't really care.
	But if you tell them, here's what it's going to mean.
	Here's the different things that they're going to enact with CBDC. And everybody hates it.
	You know, if you just go out and do a poll and say, what do you think about CBDC? What if the Federal Reserve were to do this and that?
	Oh, that's no problem. But then you actually talk about how it works in their everyday life and they really hate it.
	So that's the key thing is to educate people.
	And that's a part of it is having the hearts and minds.
	So today your book is released today, is that correct?
	That is correct.
	You're my first interview of the day.
	That's great. I'm honored.
	Thank you so much for coming on.
	And it's really exciting to see that.
	I've been seeing the articles on Breitbart about Controllagarchs, and it's very important to understand where these people are coming from.
	Thank you so much.
	And again, best place anywhere to get it, we can get it on Amazon and buy it from one of Controllagarchs.
	I know. It's a big problem that Amazon is...
	I mean, I feel terrible that it's sold on Amazon as I'm out there saying, no, cancel your Amazon subscription.
	You can go to Controllagarchsbook.com.
	I've got Books of Millions linked there.
	I've got Barnes& Noble.
	There's some local bookstores.
	I mean, it's...
	It's getting tougher and tougher not to buy things on Amazon.
	They're monopoly. And that's one of the reasons I wrote the book, is their monopoly is a big problem.
	So buy it anywhere you can.
	Yeah, that's the thing.
	Our choices are really getting very narrowly constricted here.
	And it really went into steroids when we had the lockdown in 2020.
	We had so many mom-and-pop stores.
	if they hadn't already been taken down by wall street and a you know to an oligarchy of two or three competitors that are funded off of wall street then that pandemic locking them down that was really kind of the final nail in the coffin for a lot of small businesses but yeah you're right we're going to continue to see this narrow down if we can't start to think and act at a local area so it's a great thank you so much again the The book is Controllogarchs.
	And we're talking to Seamus Bruner, who is the author of that.
	And a long history of Peter Weitzer doing deep dives on Hillary Clinton and her finances, and that really is the key to look at where the money is.
	So thank you so much for what you do.
	It was great talking to you. Thank you.
	Thank you so much, David. It was a real pleasure.
	Thank you. All right, folks, we're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
	Stay with us.
	Stay with us.
	Stay with us.
	Stay with
	us. .
	Making sense.
	common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing.
	Check out the Jazz Channel at APSRadio.com and the APS Radio app and leave the stress behind.
	Yeah, along this line, there was a Wall Street Journal article that just recently came out.
	Of course, you'll find a reference with some comments at Technocracy News, another really good site I would recommend.
	As he points out, he says, so this whole age of abundance, we've seen this talked about several different times.
	And I should have mentioned to, I meant to mention to Seamus, get his take on what George Gilder said in his book, Life After Google.
	He said, these Silicon Valley people are really just neo-Marxists.
	And that's what this Wall Street Journal article gets into.
	The idea that we have this age of abundance.
	What George Gilder said in Life After Google, he said the fatal conceit that they miss is that like Marx believed at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, he said, well, we just have, this is to him, an age of abundance.
	And we had unlimited material goods.
	And all we had to do was to worry about how we're going to distribute them.
	And of course, we'll let the government distribute it, right?
	But that was his fatal conceit.
	But you hear that all the time now, don't you?
	Oh, we got genetics, robotics, artificial intelligence, nanotech.
	We have just unlimited material things.
	And we just have to distribute it.
	And you're not going to have to work.
	We'll just put you on universal basic income.
	And so the Wall Street Journal...
	In terms of talking about technocrats, when it comes to the future, Elon Musk's best case scenario for humanity sounds a lot like sci-fi socialism.
	They got a little technocrats magazine cover here.
	$30 million out of work in 1933 or $20,000 a year income for every family.
	Which of these do you want? And that's really the way the technocrats are selling it.
	Back when you go to Elon Musk's grandfather, Joshua Haldane, when he was trying to get rid of government.
	You know, government had given us the Great Depression, right?
	And so this is their little handbook explaining technocracy.
	And pull that back up again.
	The footnote there says, explaining technocracy, a revolution without bloodshed.
	And it'll be an age of abundance.
	You see what Elon Musk is really selling us?
	The same bunch of nonsense from these science fiction writers like H.G. Wells that was bought into by his grandfather really does believe that.
	Utopian vision for what could occur when super smart robots are able to replace everyday workers.
	We will be in an age of abundance.
	I think work is a good thing.
	Uh, it gives people purpose in their lives.
	Rishi Sunak told Elon Musk when he was talking about how, Hey, look, you know, we're just, I get a little bit of concern about this because you're saying people aren't going to need to work and we're going to put them on universal basic income.
	Uh, Rishi Sunak said, and if you remove a large chunk of that, then what does that mean?
	You know, I kind of find it interesting, if you haven't read, if you're a Christian, you haven't read Randy Alcorn's book, Heaven.
	It's a very interesting take on it.
	Because one of the things that he said, you know, we've got this popular idea that's been sold to us by Hollywood and the media and people who aren't Christians and don't read the Bible, that, you know, we're going to, Heaven will be just floating around on clouds, strumming harps, you know, the type of thing. It's kind of like the theology that you see in It's a Wonderful Life.
	I love that movie. I like the banker aspects of it and the parallels to J.P. Morgan and the small town community and all the rest of this stuff.
	But their theology is really wacky.
	The angel will get his wings.
	But, you know, you get your wings and you just float in a cloud and you strum harps.
	And he talked to a lot of people.
	Randy Alcorn is a pastor.
	He said he talked to a lot of people. And it's like, I don't want to do that.
	And really, you know, you want to have work that you want to do.
	And as Randy Alcorn thought about it, you know, and again, you know, a lot of it is just kind of his interpretation of what God has made man for.
	And he talks about, you know, what will heaven be like?
	You know, I think we'll have jobs.
	I think we'll have things to do because that fulfills us.
	We don't want to live in a life of idleness.
	We just won't have the kind of frustration that we have now in this life because in this life the world has been cursed because of Adam's disobedience.
	And so it's very hard for us. To earn a living by the sweat of our brow and against the weeds and the rest of the stuff.
	But, you know, that stuff moves away.
	Then it becomes work becomes not only something that we do to fulfill ourselves, but it becomes a real pleasure.
	Imagine if you were actually able to grow food and not have it all die, which is what happens when we try to grow it.
	I know some people are able to do that.
	But if you could make a look at Karl Marx in 1848, It's referenced in this article here.
	He wrote, in 1848, he wrote a little piece, not a full book.
	He called it The Fragment on Machines.
	And in that, Marx said, the culmination of automatic systems of machinery set in motion by an automaton, a moving project that moves itself, mechanical, intellectual organs.
	If goods produced without human labor, the economy will fall apart and capitalism will fail, which is always, of course, his big boogeyman.
	He went to see capitalism fail, but he believed that, you know, once you had a situation where goods are produced without human labor, capitalism is going to fall apart.
	And quite frankly, it may.
	That may be one of the things that they're looking at.
	It's one of the things that Bloomberg said, well, you know, if we don't have jobs, we're going to have to give you some universal basic income or else you're going to come after us with guillotines.
	He actually said that. And so that is one part of it.
	Musk has cast his work to develop humanoid robots as an attempt to solve labor issues.
	He said, I wouldn't worry about putting people out of a job.
	We're actually going to have and already do have a massive shortage of labor.
	He said that's one of the things that when I was talking to Seamus about Elon Musk, he doesn't buy into the depopulation, overpopulation stuff of most of these guys because he's coming at it from a technocracy standpoint.
	And part of what the technocrats, a core part of their religion, let's just call it that way, because you need to think of it that way.
	It's not just a worldview. It really is worldview and religion.
	They're really kind of interchangeable with each other, aren't they?
	You know, worldview is how you interpret things.
	It's your value system.
	It's, you know, it's at the core of your belief.
	And so their worldview, their religion, if you will, It's that we're going to go to the stars.
	I used to work for a guy who used to always rant about that stuff.
	He loved Elon Musk because he's also into this New Age stuff the guy worked for.
	And so, you know, we're going to go to the stars.
	We're going to conquer the stars and all the rest of this stuff.
	And, you know, that may be our destiny in the afterlife if we are Christ's.
	But in this life, that's part of their God complex.
	And we're going to need all these people because we've got to populate the universe.
	That is the technocracy, their mindset, of course, about all this.
	This article, I thought, had an interesting title from RT. Everything is broken by design.
	Why the elites want everything and everyone to have an expiration date?
	And that is really kind of the way of looking at it.
	You know, when they talk about the Internet of Things, you understand that you are one of the things...
	That they want to be able to control and to track and to surveil and to inventory.
	You know, you are their herd.
	And so a big part of this is to make sure they know everything that you're doing and can anticipate everything that you're going to do.
	But it's also about planned obsolescence and about making you and your skills constantly obsolete to create a dependency on them.
	That allows them to control.
	And that's what they have in common with the government.
	The government has always been about setting up systems to build dependency.
	And it usually comes to us out of a soft tyranny.
	That's the thing that's really been perfected here in America and in the West.
	That soft tyranny.
	Which, again, H.G. Wells and his time machine kind of hearkened to, you know, the Eloi and the Morlocks, how, you know, you could pacify these people and basically prey on them by making them pets, right?
	And that's what the government is always seeking to do.
	It's always seeking to make pets out of us.
	That's what the welfare system has done.
	That's what the universal basic income system is designed to do.
	It's what, when you look at their approach to transportation, everything they want, always want public transportation.
	And they want public health.
	Because they don't want you having any responsibility for your stuff.
	They want to give it to you, make you dependent upon them, and now becomes a system of control.
	And again, this is one of the reasons why these guys are getting into the big healthcare data systems right now.
	It's why they're going to tie all the healthcare and the food to your global ID. They make you dependent, and then the strings that they attach are going to be your chains of slavery.
	Some comments from people.
	Anyway, thank you very much for the tip.
	He says, skip the government.
	Fregan, thank you very much for the tip.
	God bless you all. Thank you very much.
	And some comments about robots.
	Jim Z's 7 says the elites want to colonize the U.S. and have everything made in China.
	Don't need blue collar when you've got slave CCP. That's right.
	Or, you know, just put the robots right here.
	You know, when you go back and you look, I remember Trump's tax plan.
	And, you know, as I was talking about it with Gerald Slenty and how the real benefactors of all this stuff were the biggest companies and a big part of what they were able to do.
	They made so much money and they reduced their taxes so much.
	That they were going to be repatriating things.
	And of course, that's great. We're going to make America great again.
	Except, you know, they were buying their own stock with that money.
	They weren't necessarily building things.
	But when they come back and they build stuff, they're going to build factories that aren't going to need you or employ you.
	That's a big part of it.
	And so what that tax plan did was to create this massive capital base For companies like Apple, they actually had a PR problem because they had been given so much money.
	So they had to make a big show of giving some of it away because it was such a windfall for them.
	The tax plan that's put together by Goldman Sachs, globalists Steve Mnuchin, and Donald Trump.
	But they're going to rebuild that, and that's how they're going to onshore manufacturing.
	And when they onshore it, It'll be with robot mechanical slaves that they'll bring it back in.
	Distorted perception says robots will be soldiers and police.
	No conscience, no soul programmed better than humans can be.
	Absolutely right. It's already happening.
	And again, I think, you know, I really hated the premise of Elysium.
	It was really, at its core, it was a socialist premise, and at its core, it was pushing government-controlled healthcare and things like that.
	But they got a lot of things right in it.
	Matt Damon, if you remember, starred in it.
	You remember the scene where there's the robot cop beating them?
	How they're living in austerity, everybody on Earth, and yet...
	The elites had already gone to Elysium, which was this near-Earth orbit, you know, floating space stations modeled off of Gerard K. O'Neill's high frontiers, toroidal-shaped and things like that.
	If you remember that, those drawings are straight out of that book in the early 1970s.
	And, of course, Jeff Bezos has said many times that is one of his...
	Favorite books. And that's exactly what he wants to do with his...
	Was it Deep Blue or something in the name of his...
	Blue Origin.
	Blue Origin is what he calls it.
	And he would like to set up these space stations and the Lagrange Libration Points, the gravitationally neutral areas between the Earth and Moon.
	And that's exactly what it was depicted there.
	And it's exactly what Hugo de Garris talked about in his book, The Artilect Wars.
	He said the elites are going to weaponize artificial intelligence against us.
	And he was somebody who was...
	He believed, as an atheist and as a scientist, he believed that they were going to create a godlike intelligence.
	And he said as people realize this, when the public catches on, they're going to come after these people.
	So these people will...
	Get themselves off the planet.
	He called the elites.
	He called them the Cosmists.
	And he says, those of us who are stuck on Earth, what we call the Terrans, and they will unleash a war against us with their superior technology from their high frontier Lagrange libration points.
	And he says there'll be Gigadeth and all that.
	Well, you know, that's, I think, a pretty accurate understanding of what the scenario will be.
	Michael DeSilvio says they'll need highly trained technicians to fix the robots because they constantly malfunction.
	Yeah, that's the way it is right now, but of course, they'll probably leverage the artificial intelligence pretty quickly so that it just, you know, says, hey, do this.
	And then when they get the robots who have sufficient dexterity, they will cut out that person as well, perhaps.
	I don't know. Yonah, hey, good to see you there.
	To the lords and the nobles of our time, robots are preferable to serfs.
	Yeah, yeah. Well, again, they're slaves.
	It's a check word for slave.
	Distorted perceptions. They only need people that can create and build the bots.
	In the end, people won't know how to actually live and be human.
	We're becoming what they want eventually, and that is transhuman.
	Three Little Birds says, China is a collapsing economic Ponzi scheme, just like America.
	We will fall together, but China has way more gold.
	Yeah, they followed the blueprint that's been laid out by these technocrats, as I showed you yesterday.
	they got 90% vacancy rate.
	And, you know, whereas New York is, you know, like a 48% vacancy rate, they've got a 90% vacancy rate and the streets are empty.
	It truly is amazing to see that.
	Like I said, you know, it was, you know, just everything was packed and crushed wherever we were.
	You could barely move for all the people.
	And to see those streets empty, well, they really got their message across.
	You know, we talk about a cultural revolution that took place right in front of our eyes.
	And of course, that was the most important thing that was exported by China, which all of our Western governments imitated.
	The Joker Ace says, robotics engineers, the last of the useful idiots.
	Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
	Creating the things that will kill them, I guess.
	You know, as Mark said, the capitalists will sell the rope that we use to hang them.
	And I guess robotics engineers will...
	Maybe there's going to be some good guys out there who will exploit the vulnerabilities of these things at one point.
	Because they are going to be weaponized against us.
	And you notice that one of the first things they're doing is to make them into police and, you know, autonomous killing machines and things like that.
	The autonomous killer drones and robotic dogs and all the rest of this stuff.
	So, during the interview, a Syrian girl was saying the idea to make everything so expensive that only an oligarch can afford to buy it.
	Yeah. Octo spook.
	They are so rich money no longer gives them good feelings about themselves.
	Creating a population of serfs and peasants gives them a good feeling about being better than the population.
	I agree. Yeah.
	Syrian girl says it's always been the motivation behind the uber rich.
	Not that they are rich, but they have to see everybody else as poor.
	And they're constantly looking over their shoulder.
	You know, that's the other thing. That's one of the reasons why they want to kill us all.
	Because as long as there's a lot of people out there, the chances are that somebody is going to rise up There's going to be a challenge to them.
	And so that's how they have to keep this control.
	Michigan says the world economic system is one big monopoly.
	Then figureheads are appointed.
	DARPA gave us Microsoft.
	Then it was handed to Gates and a fake capitalism.
	It's all monopoly via government fascism.
	Yeah, DARPA, you know, running their election guard and news guard stuff through Microsoft.
	You know, it's kind of a facade.
	They say it's regulatory capture, but I've come to believe that Pfizer, Monsanto, Google, Amazon, Apple are government-manufactured.
	Yeah. Not capitalist owners.
	They're government-appointed. Federal Reserve.
	Yeah, I agree with you. I think so.
	That's why I said, you know, they created these venture capital firms.
	It's very, you know, important for them to, just like they do the elections, right?
	You're going to allow certain people into the debates, right?
	People that are not really going to directly challenge you.
	You allow certain people into the big mainstream media that are not going to directly challenge your narratives and that type of thing.
	And then let them compete with each other.
	May the best person win because, you know, we want to have that competition to get excellence.
	We're going to limit the competitors to those who will serve us when they win.
	BlackRock and Vanguard, says Risha M., seem like they're shareholders of all the corporations.
	Yeah. Yeah, the three of them pretty much own everything.
	BlackRock, Vanguard, and what was the other one?
	There's one more. But those are the two biggest.
	Andy, CO2 is so dangerous that commercial greenhouse operations install CO2 generators inside large greenhouses.
	That'll be the next thing. They'll sequester it, and then they will underground, and then they'll charge us to be able to grow food, probably.
	Three Little Birds says, China doesn't have enough workers to maintain the rates they manufacture stuff at right now.
	Robots will be necessary.
	Honor Seekers said, if they want to live forever, tell them to repent and be baptized.
	Yeah, exactly. That's right.
	But again, they follow the same lie from the Garden of Eden, right?
	You'll drink, you'll have this tree of knowledge, and you'll become like God and you'll live forever.
	And they believe that. They've taken a bite of that apple, and they really do believe that satanic promise.
	Well, you know, RFK Jr., in terms of talking about this, and again, I'm not a big fan of the policies of RFK Jr., and even on the vaccines, as we were talking about earlier, you know, constantly saying, I'm not an anti-vaxxer, I'm not an anti-vaxxer, believe him, he's not an anti-vaxxer.
	I am an anti-vaxxer.
	Ich bin ein anti-vaxxer.
	Of course, I guess, whenever I say that, I always think of JFK when he went to Berlin during the airlift.
	And he says, Ich bin ein Berliner.
	Instead of, Ich aus Berlin.
	I am from Berlin. What he said was, I'm a jelly donut.
	Because a Berliner was a jelly donut.
	And they always cut that there because the crowd started laughing at his attempt to speak German.
	That's why, you know, as Americans, we are woefully ignorant in terms of other languages and geography.
	And that's one of the reasons why we should not get involved in foreign entanglements because we don't know what we're talking about.
	But this was sent to me by John.
	RFK Jr. saying they can outbid your children and own all of the homes, that they are on track to own 60% of the homes by 2030.
	This is an article that was sent to me again by John, thank you John, of Benziga.com.
	And of course, he said this on Twitter.
	There was a clip on Twitter where he was talking about it.
	But as I say in this article, housing affordability has been a pressing issue in America.
	While many people point to supply shortages, rising material costs, stagnant wages, as drivers behind the crisis, RFK Jr.
	believes there's another culprit, corporations.
	He said the real reason that housing has outpaced anything else is because there's three giant corporations, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street.
	That was the one I couldn't remember. He said these three companies already own 88% of the S&P 500, and now they're coming after single-family homes in America.
	And this makes it a lot more challenging for people to try to buy a home.
	And, of course, this has been developing and escalating for several years now, especially when the interest rates were low.
	We all hear these stories of somebody, a friend of ours, who tried to go buy a home and was about to put the money down, sign the contract, go into escrow.
	The last minute, somebody comes in with a cash offer.
	And they take it off the table.
	And if you're saying, who is this with a cash offer?
	If we look into it, it's an LLC with an ambiguous name.
	And if you pull the strings and follow the breadcrumbs, it leads you to BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, said Kennedy.
	So they can outbid you.
	They can outbid your children.
	Our families are now competing against these companies, which are trying to buy every single family home.
	And, of course, what they will do after they turn us all into renters, again, everything has to be rented.
	They want to rent you your entertainment.
	You know, you want streaming service.
	You don't want to own physical media, that type of thing.
	And, you know, whether you're talking about the model even that Adobe has followed or some of these other companies I remember years ago, Uh, kids started getting into 3D modeling and, um, uh, all the 3D modeling software companies, just like, uh, Adobe started going to a, um, licensing annual licensing thing where you rent software and, um, would not sell it.
	So we went the one that was left at the time.
	This is over a decade ago, maybe about 15 years ago.
	Light source was the only one.
	They would do 3D modeling.
	Of course, now there's some new ones that have come out that are kind of open source stuff, and that's going to be the way it is.
	But the big guys all want to rent everything.
	As my son says, Blender is now the modeler that everybody uses.
	So, yeah, I don't do that.
	they do that.
	But so he said if he's elected president, this is what he would do about it.
	He would introduce a federal program that backs mortgages at 3% financed by tax-free bonds.
	The mortgages would be available exclusively to individuals excluding corporations.
	Well, that sounds pretty good.
	It Again, it would be, you know, the government's not giving anything other than tax incentives to people.
	A low interest rate, but it's offset by the fact that these people don't have to pay taxes on it.
	But the thing I'm concerned about is that since Kennedy supports reparations, it probably would have skin color exclusions on it as well.
	Because he's ultimately a Democrat.
	He said, this will drop mortgage payments by more than a thousand a month for medium-priced homes and allow your children to out-compete BlackRock in the marketplace.
	Well, I don't know. But as they get everybody in, if they turn everybody into renters, you know what they're going to do.
	They're going to constantly raise the rent and they're going to constantly charge you more and more for a smaller and smaller home.
	That's the whole goal.
	And that's how they get To this situation where you own nothing and you're living in the city in a 300 square foot thing.
	That is how, when you look at this, you get these big corporations.
	Look at how they're pushing ESG for the government.
	The government wants this agenda.
	They're pushing it for the government.
	They're not even trying to make money directly.
	It costs them money to do the ESG, just like it costs Coca-Cola and NASCAR money to put their agenda in our face, their racist agenda and things like that.
	Michael DeSilvio, 16 million abandoned houses here in the U.S., and nobody even knows who owns most of them.
	Yeah, they could buy it up and just shut it down.
	And force everybody into the cities.
	That's not beyond the possibility for these people.
	They just manufacture money out of thin air.
	They've, you know, they've got this fasting bargain that they've made with the devil.
	And, I mean, there just doesn't seem to be any restrictions.
	But again, you know, we have weapons that are mighty.
	And we serve a God that is stronger than the God that they serve.
	Three little birds.
	Homes are overvalued.
	Only affordable to the hedge fund devils.
	Audi at Modern Retro Radio.
	Aren't there laws against monopolies?
	Yes, there are, but they don't seem to work, do they?
	We need another law, and another one, and another one.
	Maybe we should have a constitutional convention, completely rewrite the Constitution.
	You know, that's one of the things that really scared me.
	Michael Johnson came out over the weekend.
	The people who are behind this Convention of the States thing that I have opposed, and the New American and John Birch Society has done a great job of opposing it for a very long time.
	I was surprised that they haven't talked about this.
	You know, they've been very, very happy with Michael Johnson because he's a Christian and shares a lot of their values, I guess.
	But you look at some of the policies, he has been a big supporter Of this Constitutional Convention, the Article 5 Convention, which I think is incredibly dangerous.
	You never know what's going to come out of it.
	And again, going back to history, Politico did a long article because they don't like him because he is a Christian.
	Other people cover for him because he's a Christian.
	But you have to look at the policies one-on-one.
	He's got some good policies. He's got some really scary policies.
	And the one that's really scary, when Politico did an article about it, they said, you know, remember that we got the Constitution.
	It was going to be a convention when the United States was operating under the Articles of Confederation.
	They said, well, let's fix a couple of things.
	And so they have a convention.
	And out of that convention, they didn't fix the Articles of Confederation.
	They just ignored them and created a whole new constitution.
	And that's the only constitutional convention we've had.
	Same thing could happen again.
	And John Birch Society and New American have been saying that for a long time.
	Politico said it.
	And Politico is telling you the truth about that.
	And so we've got to get past this idea, you know, that whether we like somebody or we dislike somebody, you know, I mean, you look at Trump versus Mike Johnson.
	By all indications, Mike Johnson is somebody who has lived his principles.
	He's been faithful to his wife.
	He took in a troubled young black boy as a kind of a mentor.
	He's only 11 years younger than him and did a lot to help him and many other things that he's done that are very good.
	Just the opposite of Donald Trump and his personal life.
	But you have to look at their policies, whether you agree with them or not, or whether you admire them or not.
	When they're in this position of, you know, being a politician, the policies that they're going to pursue matter.
	And it's very concerning that the Republicans, under Mike Johnson, that he has changed and now wants to fund the Ukrainian war.
	And that, at the same time, he's talking like the Republicans typically do.
	A really stupid idea.
	Let's limit the Social Security and Medicare and things like that that people have paid into all of their life and expected to get it.
	I understand the desire to privatize retirement and things like that, and I certainly support that.
	But you have to have a transition period for people who have been compelled to put money into this The Social Security Ponzi scheme all this time.
	You have to have a transition for people there.
	I don't know if they're talking about doing that or not, but I find it strange that they would talk about, well, we've got to do something to fix the budget, but let's not restrict our Ukrainian war funds or anything.
	Let's do something to take money away from people on Social Security and all the rest of the stuff.
	And I understand that's the biggest budget item there pretty much.
	But, you know, you get there by making some cuts in Ukraine instead of giving them $100 billion more.
	You make those cuts and use that to pay down that debt.
	So it is very concerning to see where that is going.
	Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, is really one of the shakers and makers calling the shots.
	Klaus Schwab is just an avatar for everyone to focus on.
	Yeah, you're right. Nathan Bedford Forrest, 1865, said that.
	The Daily Mock News says the banks and the states own most of those homes, and they choose to leave them overpriced and empty.
	Now, what does that tell us?
	Again, they...
	They're looking at the long picture.
	And that's why it's important for us to understand what the long picture is and to look at what we can do on a local basis.
	I'm glad to see that there's going to be some ideas out there, but of course they don't want to open up the debates because they don't want anybody kicking around any ideas about how we could defeat their plans.
	Thanks for listening. The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.

▲