Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 13, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:02:22

The David Knight Show - 11/13/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday the 13th of November, year of our Lord 2023.
	3.
	Well, we're going to begin today with pro-life, because everything that is being done to us always comes back to depopulation, to killing us.
	And that comes back to each individual decision.
	And today, just two hours ago, The baby in the UK whose parents wanted to give her an option of some other treatment and that Italy even gave her citizenship.
	That baby who had that denied to her by the judge and was scolded for them going against the advice of her British doctor.
	That baby has died.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, it was yesterday afternoon that the news broke that a judge ordered a UK baby to be taken off of life support.
	Even as the parents said, no, they've got a possibility of treatment.
	Let us try that treatment in Italy.
	It's going to be offered to them for free.
	They were given citizenship to try to get away from these legal restrictions.
	But, of course, it's more important for this judge to exercise his authority.
	And that's what we're talking about here.
	And we need to understand that as we look at the wars that are being escalated here, how central this is to everything.
	As I've said before, they use babies as the poster child to get you to hate the other person.
	How about if we use babies as a poster child to stop them from murdering more babies and to stop them from murdering us as well?
	Because once we go down that road, But it happens everywhere, as we talked about on Friday.
	Grace, amazing Grace, who was murdered by the doctors because she had Down syndrome, essentially.
	And the way that treatment is denied, informed consent is denied.
	This is not iotropic.
	This is not malpractice.
	This is murder. And that's why that case on Friday was so important.
	Because they were able to penetrate this idea that, well, you know, mistakes are going to happen.
	And, of course, they will. No medical treatment is going to be perfect.
	No doctor is perfect.
	And so there is insurance there.
	There's limitations there.
	Because sometimes it's going to fail.
	But when they do this deliberately, that's murder.
	And that's why that battery charge that we talked about on Friday with Scott Shera, Grace's dad, Why that is so important that we've now gotten to that point.
	You have other people who are looking at the vaccination stuff and saying, this is fraudulent.
	This is not, you had to rush to do this because there was a real pandemic or something.
	The pandemic was fraudulent.
	We'll talk about that more coming out about that.
	We'll talk about how the lockdowns are crippling so many, just globally, what it's doing to the economy.
	Still reverberating through what Trump did in 2020, the spring of 2020.
	But it all comes back to life.
	And pro-life means that you're going to be against war.
	You're going to be against killing babies, whether they're babies that were murdered by Hamas in Israel or whether they're babies that are being murdered by Israeli bombing campaigns.
	You need to stop the war.
	And you need to stop this war against our children.
	Sixty-plus million children killed via Roe v.
	Wade. Via judges' orders.
	Judges said it was okay.
	And it was okay for parents to do that.
	That was called choice. But now when the parents choose life, judges say, no, you can't do that.
	It is such hypocrisy and lies.
	All these people will say, my body, my choice, and yet you don't get any choice about your life and your medical care.
	Same people pushing that lie about my body, my choice.
	That's a fundamental lie because it's not your body.
	It's another body. And...
	They did not want you to have any choice about the treatment that you got.
	So remove informed consent.
	It's also an attack on the family, on parental rights.
	So many different things are tied up in this particular story.
	And frankly, this is not the first time this has happened in the UK. There have been situations before where the vaunted National Health Service, you remember Boris Johnson, Bojo out there, holding up signs, save the NHS. Yeah, the plan to kill us all and save the NHS. Kind of like Raven Rock, right?
	They get in their underground bunkers and they bring on a nuclear holocaust for everybody else.
	But, you know, save the government.
	Continuity of government. Continuity of the national health system in the UK. And they must not be embarrassed that somebody else could cure something.
	And so we've had situations like that before, where Italy and you've had America offer free medical treatment, we'll come pick up the baby and all the rest of the stuff, and you have people in the UK say, no, no.
	I mean, and it's coming here.
	It's coming here. You look at the fact that, you know, arresting a woman over and over again for praying silently outside an abortion clinic.
	Why? Because that's their religion.
	And they will not tolerate Anybody that gets in the way of their sacrificial rights.
	R-I-T-E-S. A judge in the UK ruled an eight-month-old baby girl must be taken off of life support, even though her parents have said she remains responsible.
	This is yesterday's article.
	And they're working to transport her to Italy for further care.
	Justice Robert Peel.
	Isn't that interesting? Same name as the guy that began their domestic police force.
	They called them Peelers.
	They called them Coppers because of the Copper.
	But they also called them Bobbies because of Robert Peel.
	It was back in the Victorian period.
	Anyway, this guy, Justice Robert Peel, issued the order.
	And the parents of N.D. Gregory, with the support of the Christian Legal Center, filed an appeal.
	But he didn't want that to happen.
	And see if you can pull up the next story down there.
	Show people a picture of the baby.
	I'm talking about this.
	Because there we are.
	There's the baby. Eight months old.
	This is infanticide, folks.
	Where do we draw the line?
	Do we draw it at 15 weeks?
	8 months? Right?
	Where do we draw the line of killing babies?
	Well, once you say that you're going to kill babies, there is no line anymore.
	We've had situations with this, with, you know, Terry Shava was an example of that.
	At the very least, the infant's parents have requested that their child be allowed to return to their home.
	But the judge ordered her treatment to end in the hospital or in hospice care.
	We're not going to let her go home to die.
	Because this is an execution.
	Look, a judge pronounces the time, the place, and the manner of your execution.
	And that's what this is.
	This is a judge executing that baby.
	Pull that picture up again while I talk here.
	In his written statement, Peel said that it would be all but impossible to remove little Lindy's life support, including her intubation, and to continue her palliative care from the couple's home.
	Medical personnel told the court the baby is, quote, clearly distressed, agitated, and in pain.
	Well, you know, as we saw in the animated film, the procedure, the baby, as they were ripping the baby's limbs off of it, one at a time, the baby was clearly distressed, agitated, and in pain.
	They don't care about that.
	They mock the Anti-abortion laws, anti-infanticide laws, let's just call it what it is, murder, okay?
	They block these anti-infanticide laws saying, well, you know, this baby, we'll call it a fetus so we pretend that that's not what it is.
	This baby, you're trying to save its pain, that's a bunch of nonsense.
	It's just a clump of cells, right?
	Well, it is now that you got finished with it.
	It was a living human being, but now you've turned it into a clump of cells.
	Which is what happens with every murder.
	I consider it essential that Indy should continue to have clinical treatment of the highest quality as he took her off of life support.
	The hypocrisy and the lies of these people.
	No, no bounds. It's amazing to me that they get away with this and they got away with it in spades in 2020.
	We saw this happening.
	Sorry, can't give you a heart transplant.
	Now, you'll have to take this shot that we know damages your heart before I give you a heart transplant.
	Sorry, we can't give you a kidney transplant, even though you've got a friend who's a donor, because both of you have to be vaccinated and neither of you are vaccinated.
	This kind of cold-blooded murder from our political system and their allies in the medical community.
	All of our institutions have been corrupted.
	All of them have.
	I consider it essential that she gets the highest quality care, he says.
	Unbelievable. The UK judge is at odds with the Prime Minister of Italy who granted Indy citizenship.
	Georgia Maloney said she's willing to do whatever she can to help the Gregory family.
	Indy's father... Condemned the UK legal system for ignoring the offering from the Italian government, he said, for the hospital and the UK courts to simply ignore this offer from the Italian government is disgraceful.
	I appeal to the British government to allow Indy to come to Italy before it's too late.
	As a father, I have never asked or begged for anything in my life, but I am now begging for the British government to please help prevent our daughter's life from being taken away.
	Personnel with a Bambino Gesu pediatric hospital in Rome have said they would immediately admit Indy and attempt a right ventricular outflow stent procedure.
	Furthermore, the Italian government has stated that it would cover the costs of the treatment.
	What good reason can there be As the Christian Legal Center called on the Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, to do something, he said, what good, Andrea Williams said, what good reason can there be to detain Indy here against the wishes of her parents when the treatment is being offered in Rome?
	The developments lay bare the difference in approach between the two nations.
	Well, because we have to destroy parental rights.
	We have to establish the fact that the government can kill you at any time when it deems that they don't think that your quality of life is good.
	Because that's what euthanasia and abortion and all the rest of this is about.
	That's what 2020 was about, you understand.
	Brought to us by Donald Trump.
	And, of course, the rest of the people worldwide who are following the orders of Of Klaus Schwab and not the Constitution.
	And so this eight-year-old child removed and died this morning.
	The judges say the rule was based on the best interest of the child to kill it.
	No consent, just a medical dictatorship.
	A specialist said that her treatment caused pain.
	And was ineffective. But of course, they don't ever care about that when they're making money, right?
	What about an abortion? Does it cause pain?
	A UK judge decried the legal tactics.
	This is the Associated Press here.
	Takes the side of the judge.
	And this poor judge and the poor doctors, they don't like the legal tactics.
	The British judge on Friday expressed profound concern about the tactics of the parents of a terminally ill infant who he was trying to kill.
	How dare them? How dare them?
	Go against my orders.
	How dare them embarrass me?
	How dare them criticize the national health system?
	I've deemed this baby should die.
	I and the medical experts, you parents don't matter.
	What happened to, you know, we just had this election and we heard all this stuff about, I don't want a bunch of politicians or a bunch of old white men deciding what I'm going to do to my body.
	What about all that stuff?
	Now, you see, the only choice they want you to make is to kill your child.
	They don't want you to make the choice about whether or not your child is going to be vaccinated.
	How your child's going to be educated.
	Anything else about you, your family?
	You know, what gender is your child going to be?
	Well, we'll decide that. Because they're obviously, whatever gender they are, it's the wrong gender.
	They've got to be the opposite gender of their body.
	We know that going in.
	And so, you know, get the parents out of the way.
	And he said, the doctors caring for Indy and other critically ill children have been put in, quote, extremely challenging positions by this legal protest here.
	Poor things.
	Poor things.
	How can they handle the pressure?
	He described it as manipulative.
	Manipulative. I think when you kill somebody as a judge, I think that's manipulative.
	Well, this judge will be judged.
	He will stand before God.
	Such actions will not be tolerated, said the judge.
	And so, to prove his point, he took the eight-month-old baby off of life care to kill it.
	And so, Emmanuel Macron steps up and says, stop killing babies.
	Was he talking about abortion?
	No. Was he talking about baby and D? No.
	He was talking to Israel.
	He said, stop killing babies.
	You see, when it comes to war, everybody understands there is a natural inclination for us to protect children.
	It's just natural. It's ingrained.
	And these politicians who want to kill us all understand how powerful that is.
	And they use it. They use it to gin up hatred for the other side.
	Both sides will show pictures of babies that were murdered, mutilated.
	When are we going to go to war against the baby killers here?
	Who killed tens of millions of babies.
	More than have ever been killed in any war, yet.
	When are we going to go against them?
	When are we going to go against Planned Parenthood and the Democrats?
	And when are we going to use the same tactics that Israelis use against Hamas and that Hamas uses against Israel?
	When are we going to show the mutilated bodies that are being killed by Planned Parenthood, by the Democrat policies?
	When are we going to show the pictures?
	But Macron says it's extremely important for all of us because of our principles, because we're democracies.
	It's important for the mid to long run as well as for the security of Israel itself to recognize that all lives matter.
	Well, how about that? I guess maybe lives matter at eight weeks or at eight months, right?
	And he said de facto, he said today civilians are being bombed de facto.
	These babies, these ladies, these old people are bombed and killed, so there's no reason for that.
	And there's no legitimacy.
	And so we urge Israel to stop.
	They can use it for their war, but they can't use it to actually stop killing their own kids.
	So, what is the status of abortion in France?
	Very interesting. Because France has just, well, just, they did about a year and a half ago, March of 2022, they expanded abortion access in two key moves.
	It was hailed by the Human Rights Watch as a positive step in reproductive rights.
	And what did they do? Well, first of all, they changed it so that the legal time frame for an abortion used to be before 12 weeks.
	They moved it to 14 weeks.
	You know, we just had an election across this country in America.
	And they said, it's a losing issue to go to 15 weeks.
	15 weeks. We're going to lose all of our elections if we don't let people kill babies at 15 weeks.
	And so, in France, they went from 12 to 14.
	Look in the United States.
	Remember, it was about a decade ago.
	It was 2013.
	And we had, at the time, I remember covering this, Chuck Schumer, very, very pro-abortion, Very, very pro-abortion.
	No restrictions at all.
	But he joined with a group to stop abortions in Israel.
	An anti-abortion group for Israelis.
	He's pro-abortion for America, but he's anti-abortion for Israel.
	Right? And this is so key to understand.
	That it's about demographics.
	It's about depopulation.
	It's about which group is going to go down, be taken down.
	It has nothing to do with women's rights, folks.
	This is about their political agenda.
	For us, it's about morality.
	For us, it's about pro-life.
	But for them, it's about the great replacement or their domination or whatever.
	And at the time, and it was almost exactly 10 years ago, it was November 13th, November 15th, 2013.
	Israeli anti-abortion organization reaches out for US support to fight the demographic war in the Jewish state.
	Preventing abortions is the key to Israel's survival as a Jewish state.
	And it is the key to the survival of every state.
	And yet, you had people like Chuck Schumer, who wants no restrictions at all in America.
	He is a pro-choice champion.
	He used the issue of abortion to become a U.S. Senator.
	He attended a 30th anniversary gala for this organization.
	It's called EFRAT. He's been given 100% rating by Planned Parenthood.
	They've called him a hero.
	100% pro-choice.
	But he joined with this group to try to stop abortions of Jews in Israel.
	And so did Deutsche Bank.
	And so did Goldman Sachs.
	And so did Prudential.
	And so you understand, this is a political issue as well.
	And so what is happening with abortion in Israel?
	In 2020, the rates of application to abortion committees for Muslim women was 6.2 per 1,000.
	For the Druze, 5.6.
	For Jewish women, 8.5.
	For Arab Christian women, 7.6.
	They are, because they're leftist and socialist and so forth.
	They have the highest abortion rate of any demographic group in Israel with the Jews, more than the Arab Christians or Muslim women.
	The rates of non-Arab Christians and women without religious classification were the highest, however.
	Even higher than Jews.
	Non-Arab Christians, 10.1.
	And those without any religious classification, 8.9.
	So, you know, it is something that is perhaps...
	Tied to the way that you view yourself, your relationship with God?
	I don't think I'll ever have to answer for this.
	For Palestinian women, abortion can mean lies, jail, or worse.
	Reuters was decrying the fact that it was difficult for Palestinian women to get abortion.
	For women seeking abortions in Gaza, the West Bank, Palestinian law strictly limits the procedure.
	The choice is stark. Have the baby or terminate the pregnancy by using ruses, risky back-alley methods, or even turning to neighboring Israel.
	Maybe you could contact a British judge.
	They like to kill babies.
	Nuki Haley said, stop the judgment about this stuff.
	This is always the one passage that every non-Christian knows.
	Judge not! Don't judge me!
	And that's what she's saying. So, you know, murder?
	You can't judge somebody for murdering.
	Come on! That's the question, right?
	Can we judge whether or not this is murder?
	He's got a heartbeat, brain, feels pain, all the way to say that.
	Different gender half the time.
	Different DNA. A unique person.
	It has all these characteristics of a human being, and yet we're not supposed to judge.
	We're not supposed to call this murder.
	We're supposed to give it to the judge who will judge and murder an eight-month-old baby.
	Yeah, that passage, by the way, one of the most abused passages.
	It was about hypocrisy.
	You know, somebody calling out somebody else for doing the same thing that they were doing.
	It says, oh, you're calling them out for that?
	Well, understand, you're going to be Hell to account for that as well.
	I mean, right there, right next to it.
	It continues on.
	He says, don't cast your pearls before swine or give what is holy to dogs or whatever.
	How do you determine that?
	Well, you'd have to judge those types of categories.
	But we're just talking about, you know, whenever a Christian says something about any kind of moral standard, oh, well, judge not.
	Judge not! Well, I'm just telling you that the judgment is coming.
	It won't be me. I won't be your judge.
	But the judge has already told you what he's going to be judging you on.
	It's kind of like an open book exam.
	If you want to open the book and look at it, you get the answers.
	And you also find out how you stand, all of us stand condemned before God, but Christ has offered us a free sacrifice to change that.
	So you don't have to.
	He's paid the penalty.
	You don't have to take the punishment.
	But they don't want you to hear that because they want to believe that they can do whatever they wish and that there will be no judgment.
	That's what they really don't want to hear.
	They're saying there will be no judgment is what they're saying when they say judge not.
	Don't judge me! They're saying there's not going to be any judgment.
	Well, we'll see about that. It's not a loving thing to not tell somebody.
	As I said before, somebody's going to step out on the curb and there's a Mack truck barreling down on them.
	There's no way that they can stop.
	You ought to tell somebody about it.
	Anyway, she says, abortion is a personal issue for every woman and every man.
	Well, think about it.
	Let's just call it what it is.
	Instead of using this catchphrase of abortion.
	Let's just call it infanticide.
	Infanticide is a personal issue for every woman and every man.
	Or just say murder.
	Murder is a personal issue for every woman and every man and every judge.
	A judge can murder you.
	The doctors and the hospitals can murder you.
	She says, I don't judge anyone for being pro-choice, and I don't want them to judge me for being pro-life.
	Some states that are going to be more on the pro-choice side, she said, I wish that wasn't the case, but the people decided.
	No, God decides.
	And what you have to decide is if this is a baby or if this is a clump of cells.
	And I think you already know the answer, right?
	And then you have to decide, do I believe there's a God who's going to judge me?
	She says, stop the judgment.
	We don't need to divide America over this issue anymore.
	What issue would that be, Nuki?
	Killing babies. At least she's consistent, right?
	She wants to kill babies.
	She wants to kill everybody everywhere.
	There isn't a more reprehensible person running for president than Nuki Haley.
	She wants to kill everybody.
	She's like a Lindsey Graham.
	Never saw a war.
	She didn't want to escalate.
	Never saw a baby.
	She didn't want to kill. I'm disgusted with her.
	Pro-lifers lawsuit over pro-abortion buffer zones allowed to proceed because they're bringing this to the U.S. This is the tolerant left, right?
	Don't judge me. Hey, you better get off the sidewalk.
	Are you praying silently?
	Okay, you're under arrest.
	This is the tolerant left that tells us, don't judge me.
	Don't judge me. A federal judge in Minneapolis ruled October 30th that a First Amendment challenge against the city's buffer zone law can proceed in what has been seen as at least a partial victory for pro-lifers in the city.
	In 2022, Minneapolis enacted a safety zone policy which creates a buffer zone prohibiting free speech activity in certain areas outside abortion facilities.
	And so the judge looked at this and says, well, you know, there are, quote, freedom of speech, free exercise of religion, And, you know, they have these over-breath claims here, but we're going to allow this to proceed.
	No problem. This is more important than all of that.
	And so, yeah.
	Yeah, go ahead and play that.
	Play the video of the lady outside the abortion clinic being interrogated.
	Are you here as part of an organized protest?
	No. You're not.
	Are you part of a pro-life organization or pro-choice organization?
	I am, but I'm not here in that capacity.
	Okay. Are you protesting?
	No. Are you here to pray for the lives of unborn children?
	No. It's a little bit leading, but no, I'm not.
	Okay. Can your action be carried out elsewhere?
	I can pray elsewhere, but I want to pray here today.
	Right. Why have you chosen the location here to stand?
	You know this is an abortion centre that I'm standing outside of.
	Are you aware that there is a public space protection order in place here?
	Yes, I am. Are you aware that you're breaching the public protection order?
	I'm not, no. Will you move from here to the exclusion zone?
	I don't believe I need to.
	If not, why are you not willing to move outside of the exclusion zone?
	Because I don't believe I need to.
	I believe I've got a right to be here.
	Okay. Right. If you believe that you're present to protect in any form, obviously we're going to need to issue with a fixed penalty notice.
	Sorry, can you explain that again? Yes.
	If you believe that you're present to protect in any form...
	If I believe what, Zoe?
	If you believe that you are present to protest...
	No, I'm not here to protest, no.
	Right. Well, you're in the PSPO. You're breaching it.
	Well, I'm in the zone. Yes.
	But I'm not protesting. Yes.
	So you're going to be given a fixed penalty notice today.
	Okay. Okay.
	Going to give you a penalty notice today.
	Thank you very much.
	My receipt for your receipt.
	Thank you very much. Okay. So nice, aren't they?
	Well, I tell you, there's nothing like British tyranny, is there?
	Served to you with such pleasantries.
	Oh, God. Makes me want to.
	Matthew Ronson. They call the medical murder, quote, going against the advice.
	That's right. Yeah.
	Always. Yeah. That's what I'll always be.
	My son says, Haley, Nuki Haley.
	I personally believe it's murder, but I would never judge anybody for committing it.
	Yeah, that's right. Jason Barker, these people who advocate for killing babies will be complaining when they get old and are forced into the suicide pod because it won't stop with babies.
	That's right. It's already escalating.
	We've said this is going to be the continuum for the longest time.
	And look at what is happening in Canada.
	And they haven't even started their MAID, M-A-I-D, Yeah, that kicks in next year.
	The Republican Party isn't even pro-life.
	It's disgusting, says DG8. Yeah.
	Hannity last week said 15 to 30 weeks.
	Whatever it takes to win in 2024.
	A good Catholic, Sean Hannity.
	Who left his wife and shacking up with one of his other co-hosts there.
	But, you know, whatever, right?
	Yeah, you make $25 million a year.
	Pretty soon, you think you can do anything.
	That's amazing. Just amazing.
	And nothing matters except getting President Trump elected.
	Yeah, what are you going to tell God when you stand before him, Sean?
	Well, you know, I had to get Trump elected.
	You know, that's why I did that stuff.
	Okay, okay.
	Similar one, two, three.
	It's a sad day when the whole debate was focused on how long a time we have to kill babies in the womb.
	That's right. That's right.
	Guard Goldsmith. Hey, Guard, good to see you, and Jason.
	Haley is so strong, quote-unquote, when talking about sending weapons to slaughter people overseas, using our tax cash, even as she withholds judgment on people who murder babies in the womb.
	Yeah, she judged all these wars, hasn't she?
	Everywhere she sees some kind of a conflict, she judges who to kill, which side to come in on.
	Or maybe give money to both of them.
	Jason Barker, those questions were a script.
	It was not an attempt to see what was going on.
	That's right. And she was very clever.
	This is her third rodeo, by the way, this lady who was arrested for praying silently.
	She's gone through this before.
	I'm not doing a protest.
	I'm here in my own personal capacity, and I know exactly what that is over there.
	It's just amazing. And they've already, this is the third time they've done this, and the first two times they threw it out of court, but that police department there just keeps doing it, and that local government, and then the courts throw it out again.
	So where does it all end up, right?
	Well, we've got the so-called ethicist, Peter Singer, who has always been, for as long as I can remember, always moving the bar on ethics.
	And now he wants to have an open discussion on bestiality.
	Don't judge me!
	Don't judge me! Okay.
	As LifeSite News says, some of our most prominent ethicists We're good to go.
	Uh, vile.
	And, uh, for example, as I noted in a lengthy essay earlier this year, the decades-long campaign by some ethicists to advocate for the moral permissibility of infanticide is beginning to pay off.
	Infanticide advocacy is not the purview of obscure crackpots.
	The same thing that we saw with a baby eight months old, right?
	Actually, you know, just think of this baby that the judge killed, um, 17 months old, okay?
	The nine months plus the eight.
	But when they talk about infanticide, what they mean is a baby after birth.
	I call it abortion infanticide, but these people are talking about afterbirth murder of babies, like we just saw with baby Indy Gregory.
	Dr. Jerry Coyne of the University of Chicago has stated that as Christianity fades, the, quote, euthanasia of newborns, unquote, will be permitted.
	That's right. That's what we saw in pagan societies in Rome.
	MIT psychologist Steven Pinker believes that laws against infanticide are difficult to defend.
	Philosopher Michael Tooley stated that infanticide, quote, should be legal up to the time an organism, a baby, learns how to use certain expressions, unquote.
	And of course, Princeton bioethicist Peter Singer famously argued in, quote, Practical Ethics, that was the name of his book, that killing a, quote, defective infant, It's not morally equivalent to killing a person.
	And of course, they will remove your personhood based on your IQ, based on your age, based on your condition.
	And there will be no such thing as informed consent.
	Peter Singer in Princeton is now writing articles about bestiality.
	He calls it zoophilia.
	That's a zoo, isn't it?
	They want to make this literally a zoo.
	He says it is morally permissible.
	He says sex with animals is a powerful social taboo that exposes its practitioners to utmost indignation and stigma.
	Oh, you mean like those of us who didn't wear the mask got social stigma and indignation?
	Those of us who questioned the pronouncements of these medical authorities who had done no science.
	We were met with indignation and stigma.
	Zophilia, he says, is one of the few sexual orientations that remains off-limits, along with pedophilia.
	So, you know, let's remove everything.
	There is, in fact, nothing wrong with having sex with animals, he said.
	It is not inherently problematic sexual exercise.
	So, you know, who are you to judge?
	Nuki Haley would say, who are you to judge?
	Because you see, what these people want to do, as we pointed out when we talked to Chief and Fleet, Mao's America, Survivor's Warning, you know, what these people need to do is they need to destroy total chaos, destroy everything, so they can be in control.
	And this is the way you do it.
	It was an interesting article that was written.
	I'm not going to go into detail about it.
	But it was an essay.
	It was written by an Arabic woman who was a Muslim.
	And she says, you know, for the last 20 years, she's struggled with this.
	Muslims were blamed, she said, for 9-11, and that bothered her a great deal.
	And she remembered going to her Islamic classes where they were taught to hate the Jew and all the rest of the stuff.
	So she said, I really had a problem with that.
	The way I coped with that was just to become an atheist.
	But she says, I looked at things, I realized...
	That Christianity has been the foundation for our rule of law, for free speech, and all the rest of these things.
	And we need to reclaim it in order to save civilization.
	So now I'm a Christian. But nowhere in her testimony did she say anything about the fact that she had come to believe that Jesus Christ was the Son of God who died for her sins.
	She's not a Christian. You can't have the fruits of Christianity If you deny the roots.
	As Solzhenitsyn said, we have the kind of Stalinist society we have because we have forgotten God.
	You don't have to actively remove God out of your life.
	You just have to ignore him long enough that he just kind of fades away.
	You know, out of thought, out of society.
	And you might try to reconstruct something That looks like a society that's based on morality and Christian principles.
	But all you're going to be doing is taping some fruit to a tree.
	It's going to be a cut flower society.
	The apple is going to die.
	The tree produces no fruit.
	And the society will just continue to die without a real connection to God.
	And these things that we see, the murder of children like this, by their fruit you will know them.
	We'll be right back. Welcome
	to my show. Making
	sense. Common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Elvis.
	Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles.
	And the sweet sounds of Motown.
	Find them on the Oldies channel at APSradio.com.
	People from one town in Michigan are using their votes to get rid of their entire board.
	Jim Chapman, 498.
	Jason Cruz, 740.
	And those cheers erupting as voters heard the results.
	The move was all due to the board previously allowing a company with international ties, specifically China, to break ground in their town.
	Senior national correspondent Brian Enten was there.
	This is really a story about small town America versus China, and in this case, small town America won.
	Green Charter Township, Michigan, they basically took out their entire local government last night in a recall election.
	They took out the entire town board because they were upset the board had voted to greenlight A Chinese-affiliated electric vehicle battery manufacturer, a massive plant with plans to come to town.
	It upset the citizens.
	They organized.
	They had this recall election upset with the board members who okayed the project.
	And they were able to take the entire board out.
	We want everyone to have a voice and not have any of the secrecy anymore.
	This whole thing that went down with Goshen was horrible from the first go-round.
	And like I said, the people have spoken.
	So exactly what happens from here out is kind of unclear because Goshen, the Chinese-affiliated company, has the land.
	They signed a development deal with the previous board, but now the new board will be in place who is against the project.
	What that means, how they'll be able to slow or stop the process, we're just going to have to wait and see.
	But still a big victory for the people in Michigan who have been fighting this Chinese-affiliated plant.
	Land of Goshen.
	That's what Granny used to say on the Beverly Hillbillies.
	Land of Goshen.
	And that's it. The land in Goshen.
	That's being sold to the Chinese.
	I want to thank Sean for sending that to me.
	He says, as you've said many times, David, this is where the rubber meets the road, is at the local government.
	And you don't like what they're doing, you can organize together, and you can take out the entire local government.
	I've seen it done, again, small town that I lived in, the county...
	Was very rural.
	Families had been there for centuries with their farms and that type of thing.
	And then you had a spillover from Chapel Hill, where the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill is.
	And I had these, you know, people with a lot more money starting coming in and building these neighborhoods.
	And they wanted to, even though they had spilled into that county, they wanted to stop any development.
	So they didn't want anybody who had farms We're good to go.
	And at the time, it was you elected county commissioners by zones, geographic zones.
	So the first thing they did was they got a majority of people to, you know, they convinced people, that's just not democratic, you know.
	It's too much like the electoral college.
	We've got to get rid of it. And so we'll have all the county commissioners voted at large.
	And since they had so many people concentrated there, They were able, once they got that rule done, they were able to completely get rid of the entire city council.
	It was exactly the opposite of what you see with this.
	But they were able to do that and control everything and control everyone.
	Now what these people are doing is they're very upset about what is happening with this Chinese affiliated plant.
	I don't know specifically what their grievance was with it.
	Maybe it's just the fact that it was Chinese.
	Maybe they were concerned about other issues in terms of pollution or traffic or other things like that.
	But the community was united in opposing this plant.
	And the commissioners weren't going to listen to them.
	We have a similar situation that started to develop here in Tennessee with a battery energy storage site.
	They want to go with renewables.
	It's being pushed in Tennessee by the Tennessee Valley Authority.
	And they had set up a contract with a Texas company to install Elon Musk equipment and create a massive battery storage facility so they could then turn off the reliable functional fuel power plants and go with unreliable stuff and store it in a battery, which represents a big fire hazard.
	And so the residents were very upset about it.
	And even though the county commissioners had said yes, it's pretty clear they were all going to get thrown out.
	And so they reversed course.
	And now that company, just like the Chinese company, Goshen, is going to, you know, what are they going to do?
	Because they have a signed deal.
	With the county, that they can proceed with this.
	And so what will have to happen in both of these situations is the new city council there, or the existing city council that changed its mind here in Tennessee, will have to come up with some legal rules to stop this and fight it in court.
	But this is the bottom line.
	You can change things at the local level.
	And it's where the most effective stuff is going to happen.
	Because think about everything that's happening with China.
	You know, we have all these officials who want to blame China for everything that happened in 2020.
	It was all China's fault.
	It was the Wu flu. It was the, you know, they locked everybody down.
	It wasn't Trump.
	It was the Chinese who did it to us, right?
	All the rest of this stuff. They want to go to war with China.
	And so, you know, they're blaming China for everything.
	Not that I like the Chinese Communists.
	I don't like them. I just see that our government is becoming just like them, unfortunately, because the Chinese Communist Party has been the beta test site for all these globalist plans because they're just like our elected representatives, these Chinese Communist Party members.
	Are completely on board with doing anything that these people want.
	But the bottom line is that as much as you hear all this talk in Washington about how evil China is, they're not going to do anything to stop any of this stuff.
	It'll be stopped by people locally or it won't be stopped at all.
	Just another example of it.
	I also got this from Cam in Nairobi.
	Who saw the Xi Van Fleet interview.
	One of the best and most enlightening I've seen all year.
	I highly recommend that to anybody if you haven't seen it.
	She really lays out what this is.
	And look, this is not wokeness.
	Even the term woke is essentially a translation from what they were doing in China.
	But it is full-on the same pattern that Mao used in China.
	People need to understand what this is.
	I mean, I even had an interview, and I didn't get into it with him because I wanted to hear what else he had to say about the book he'd written about a guy who was talking about what was happening in the corporations, and he called it wokery and all the rest of the stuff.
	I don't like to use that term.
	But it is a communist term.
	And he even said, no, a lot of people say this is Marxism.
	No, it is Marxism.
	He was absolutely wrong about that, my guest was.
	I didn't argue that with him.
	I wanted to hear the story about the Project Veritas whistleblower, but he was absolutely wrong about this.
	It is 100% exactly what happened to her as a child.
	What they're doing in the schools, what they did to the families, what they did to society and to culture.
	This is a step-by-step pattern that we're walking through.
	Same thing. That's why she calls it Mao's America.
	The survivor's warning.
	And so, anyway, he actually wrote an article about it, wrote a review of it, talked about the principles in it, so I appreciate him doing that.
	Mao's America, Survivor's Warning.
	Get the book. Take a look at the interview.
	She really knows her stuff.
	It's very important to hear this, and we've seen this from people who've lived under Stalin, people who've lived under Mao, and they're freaked out.
	Because this is in lockstep with what was done in those societies.
	How they turned the children against their parents.
	How they destroyed all institutions, especially the family, especially the church.
	But they're focused on the Chinese now here.
	And this is, again, to move this to the next stage of depopulation.
	We need to have a world war.
	To really create chaos and take everything down.
	It's going to be the culmination of all this stuff.
	And so you keep seeing all of these petty criticisms in the public press, the mainstream media, about what is happening with China and this country.
	And here's one example.
	Chinese Bitcoin mines, a threat to U.S. national security.
	This article appeared on Zero Hedge.
	And it's absolute rubbish, really.
	This is part of the war on crypto.
	They accuse these people of being a front for the Chinese Communist Party, but then they undermine their own headline in the body of the article.
	And then when they get into the fretting about power on the grid, And it is absolute nonsense.
	They've got a couple of Bitcoin mining facilities, and they said, well, this is too close to some military bases.
	How far do you have to be in the United States away from a military base?
	I mean, it's kind of like they've got the 1,000-foot, you can't get within 1,000 feet of a school carrying a gun.
	If you really take that seriously, you wouldn't be able to carry a gun anywhere.
	Same type of thing here.
	Chinese cryptocurrency mining operations have been discovered in 12 U.S. states.
	And the Pentagon is overseeing surveillance of a Chinese Bitcoin mining facility in Cheyenne, Wyoming.
	The site is near a Microsoft data center that houses sensitive information, providing critical support for the Pentagon.
	Whoop-de-doo. I mean, I'm not...
	But it's not that I... I'm making excuses for the Chinese.
	But do you understand how they're trying to whip up this propaganda for war with China?
	I don't want war with China.
	And so we have to call out this nonsense for what it is.
	And they even go on in the article saying, well, following the 2021 ban on Bitcoin mining in China, shipments of Bitmain equipment to the U.S. surged 15-fold.
	Yeah, these people had massive operations where they were doing Bitcoin mining in China.
	And just one day, just like that, the government shuts it down.
	So what did they do? They took their stuff and they went to other countries.
	That's what this is about.
	And prior to 2021, the majority of global cryptocurrency mining operations were concentrated in China.
	However, following Beijing's decision to ban such activities, the industry shifted to other nations, including the United States.
	So they even undermined their narrative about how, oh, this is the Chinese spying on military facilities.
	China's decision to ban cryptocurrency mining was prompted by concerns related to excessive energy consumption and the inability to regulate the flow of currency out of the country.
	That's what it's really about. The stuff about the environment and all the rest of that.
	That was one of the four areas...
	That Biden told all of his bureaucracies, the deep state, all the bureaucracies underneath the executive branch, he told them, you know, look at climate.
	That's one of the four things. You know, the other ones had to do with how they were going to implement it, enforce it, redesign the system and all the rest, redesign the entire financial system.
	But then they put that one in because that was going to be the excuse to go to war with crypto because that's what China had done.
	See, we're becoming China.
	I don't like China. I don't like the Chinese Communist Party.
	I don't like their government.
	But our government is becoming exactly like them.
	That's why I said, you know, I got kicked off one of the three strikes that I had when they gave me three strikes.
	You know, prior to that, they just kicked me off.
	And then after that, they just kicked me off when I had a music site, Christmas music.
	Just kicked me off when they figured out who I was.
	But the one time that I got three strikes and you're out, One of the three strikes is me saying in January of 2021 that 2020 was the year the world became China.
	They didn't like that because I didn't like what the world became in 2020, and I made it very clear I didn't like it.
	So, in this article, they say, Beijing's pursuit of cryptocurrency regulation aligns with its economic policies, whereas in the U.S., the government's primary concern is rooted in national security.
	No, it's not. No, it's not.
	I mean, their thing is national security because they're a totalitarian state.
	We are the same thing.
	We want to become a totalitarian, at least our federal government wants to become a totalitarian government.
	They admire China.
	Trudeau, George W. Bush, all of them cannot hide their admiration for being able to be a totalitarian dictator.
	I wish I could be like China and just tell everybody what to do.
	Well, they got a chance to do that in 2020.
	Now, it's all about totalitarianism, whether it's the U.S. or whether it's the CCP. It's not about economics or national security.
	It's about totalitarianism.
	National security is just the label that we call totalitarianism here in the United States.
	Many of the Chinese mines are located in parts of the U.S. where there is little or no industry, or in places like Niagara Falls where joblessness is high.
	So, in other words, It's not some kind of an espionage thing, right?
	Which is the way they headline this.
	I mean, they just destroyed their argument there.
	I want to catch up with some of this.
	Dougalug, thank you very much for that tip.
	I appreciate that on Rockfin.
	He says, hit that like button, my friends.
	Thank you very much, Dougalug.
	And I'll remind you, please like and share the broadcast.
	That helps us. If we can get a broader base of support.
	That really will help us, and so please do that.
	Good Footprints says, now let's do that with senators and governors.
	Yeah, throw them out. But see, it's harder.
	The further up you go, the harder it is.
	The higher up you go, the less leverage you have.
	Grassroots is where you're going to have the most leverage, and that's where things can be made either better or worse, as we saw in 2020.
	Obsolete man, 1776.
	Okay, so who will sit on the board and make sure this doesn't go down behind closed doors?
	Yeah, that's true. You know, the price of liberty is eternal vigilance, isn't it?
	Mission Goose says, let the township tax them a billion dollars a day.
	See, there's a lot of different ways you can skin this goose here.
	Until the township owns the land, let the township rule out foreign ownership.
	Yeah. Yeah, there's a lot of different things that you can do.
	We've seen government use that against its own citizens many times.
	You know, tax them off, like, say, oh, you know, you gotta...
	I saw this happen in Tampa.
	I see there's a little bit of flaking of paint on your house.
	I think you need to repaint your entire house.
	I'm going to start charging you a per diem fine of $50, let's say, a day that you don't paint your house.
	And these are poor people. I can't do that.
	Well... I guess when the fines get up to a certain amount, we're just going to have to take your house.
	Seeing that happen. So you could do that against that corporation if you want.
	Grant 7777.
	I've started to use communism instead of, well, good, because that's what it's about.
	And if anybody questions it, refer them to Xi Van Fleet's book or to the interview.
	MJ, David is right.
	We become more like China every day.
	Remember, our tech companies are helping make us like China.
	Now, they supply totalitarian systems to China, and now they want it here.
	Exactly. They give it to them.
	They have the Chinese test it, perfect it, and then they push it on to us.
	They're doing the beta testing.
	For the smart city open air prisons and everything else like that that's happening in China.
	This, I thought, was an interesting positive spin on artificial intelligence.
	Maybe unintentionally so.
	Jeffrey Katzenberg says that AI will slash 90% of animation jobs in three years.
	You know, we frequently talk about how disruptive technology is going to destroy some jobs, but it's going to create opportunities in other places.
	You know, a lot of libertarian economists like to look at it that way and say the glass is half full, you know.
	Well, here's one of the places where the glass might be half full.
	It might be an opening for people other than Katzenberg and Disney and that ilk to tell their stories.
	Because in it, he talks about the fact, he says, he thinks within just three years, 90% of the animation jobs will be gone.
	Because there's a lot of tweening and, you know, they have to hire skilled artists to do this stuff.
	But it's very repetitive.
	You got the people who will come up with a concept and write the script.
	and people who create the characters and the dialogue and all the rest of this creative stuff like that.
	But then you have a lot of other people who, once they're given a character, if you've ever seen the way that Disney Animation Studios run, what they do is they create these characters, they make a three-dimensional model of it.
	And that's the reference for all these different animators who have to keep it consistent.
	And so Katzenberg said, in the good old days, you might need 500 artists in years.
	To make a world-class animated movie.
	But I don't think it'll take 10% of that three years from now.
	He says, I don't know of any industry that'll be more impacted than any aspect of media, entertainment, and creation.
	And see, I think this is good.
	I think you can open this up.
	And he says, you know, when you got 500 artists in years to do this, This is why a 70-minute animated film costs $250 million today.
	All that labor. You've got all these animators working for years on this particular thing.
	I think what's going to happen, perhaps, is that you'll have people who have different stories, who have stories that are not weaponized against us.
	And I think maybe they will have.
	It's certainly still going to be expensive.
	You better believe that the AI people are going to charge not that much less than if you hired the humans, but it'll be less.
	It'll be enough to make it attractive, but it won't be enough to make it cheap.
	But it'll still bring it down.
	And I think as the technology, you know, initially it'll be very, very expensive, but then other people will look at it and other people will replicate the technology.
	And I think there'll be competition on the software side to bring this down.
	And so to give people who have good stories an opportunity to tell their story.
	Rather than Disney.
	Because as we see this last weekend, we had the latest incarnation of their garbage, their propaganda garbage, the Marvels.
	I think I saw the trailer of it.
	I didn't even watch.
	I couldn't even bear to watch the entire trailer.
	So I'm just going with first impressions.
	But I can tell you that I'm pretty good at that.
	I've operated a video store for 14 years, and I did it based on looking at movie trailers, made judgments about that, along with the box office information as to what to purchase and what quantity.
	Yeah, it's, you know...
	It's just this...
	It just starred Megan Rapinoe in it.
	But, you know, that type of thing.
	All the heroes are women and all the villains are women.
	And, you know, this is Disney's idea of what they should do.
	Second worst...
	It was on course for the worst opening, but it looks like it may be the...
	Maybe the lowest opening weekend for the franchise.
	All the Marvel superhero things that Disney bought.
	Other people did them, made them successful.
	Disney bought it, ruined it.
	And so it had the second lowest grossing opening day, and it looks like it's going downhill from that.
	And it's kind of interesting when you look at the amount of money they're about to lose on this.
	They made about $50 million, perhaps, over the weekend.
	But when you put it up against some of the Christian films like Sound of Freedom and things like that that have come out, you know, independently produced, that's a good contrast to this.
	It had a very limited release.
	And it did really well, and it kept increasing as they got more theaters involved.
	And now The Sound of Freedom is up to $250 million worldwide in terms of gross.
	$250 million. And they did that on a film that cost $15 million.
	Disney bought the studio that produced Sound of Freedom, and they looked at it and said, no, I'm not putting that out.
	And it was free.
	I mean, it's like if the thing had made $5, they would have had a $5 profit.
	But they don't want to tell that story.
	They want to tell the story of all-female superhero league.
	That's the story they want to tell.
	And so it's their social engineering.
	They let it sit on the shelf.
	And it was a real struggle.
	But it only cost $15 million to make.
	It was free to Disney, but they didn't want to release it.
	It was like a $15 million gift, and it made more than that its first weekend.
	$250 million gross cost $15 million, and Disney would not even put it out there.
	Now, contrast that to this garbage.
	It cost them $300 million to make it, and of course, the advertising that they've put on this thing, usually you double the budget of what it costs to make it.
	You usually spend that much in advertising as well.
	So who knows? $600 million, $500 million that they're into this thing on.
	And they're going to take a beating, you know, even with the opening weekend.
	They're only at about $50 million.
	And so, yeah, the AI is perhaps going to give people a chance to tell stories.
	But, you know, you don't even need to have the AI. The Sound of Freedom was a drama.
	It didn't need all the special effects.
	It didn't need animation. It didn't need flying superheroes and all the rest of the stuff that's so expensive.
	That's why it only costs $15 million to make instead of $300 million to make.
	And all that eye candy is not helping them at all.
	As a matter of fact, that great big eyeball thing that's in Las Vegas, it certainly is striking and amazing to see it.
	And it is a spectacle. But it's losing money.
	And they say, the problem is, is that when you get these big spectacles like this, they don't last too long.
	That the way you really get people involved, yes, it really does smack you because of the size and the magnitude of the thing, but then, you know, it wears off very quickly.
	The thing that really draws people in is a story.
	A compelling story.
	Disney can't do that anymore.
	So... Real Jason Bark.
	Thank you, Jason. I appreciate the tip.
	Thank you. Let's not wait until the end of the month to fill the tanks, folks.
	Well, thank you very much. And A. Wootz, thank you also for the tip.
	Awesome interview the other day. David shared many times.
	Thank you. Grant777.
	I've started to use... Oh, I've gotten them before.
	KWD68 says, Chinese people built runways by hand for our bombers in World War II. Breaking and hauling gravel with even a few hand tools.
	Five years later, they're being murdered by Mao.
	That's awful. Yeah. Oh, I'll tell you.
	Really hardworking people.
	And they did that in the U.S. as well.
	They came in and when they immigrated into the United States with nothing, a lot of them, they did the hardest menial task and the dangerous tasks as well.
	That's where the phrase hasn't got a Chinaman's chance because they put them in very dangerous work, building bridges and railways as we're building the infrastructure.
	It also says Disney blames their failures on COVID. Hero fatigue.
	Disney fatigue is what I've got.
	And the patriarchy.
	Yeah, it definitely couldn't be bad writing, directing, acting, and gender-swapping feminist trash productions.
	That's absolutely right. Well, let me just say one more thing, and when we come back, we're going to talk about the lockdowns.
	And that is, you know, Veterans Day on Friday.
	We did an abbreviated show.
	We pre-recorded it. By the way, I want to thank Geese Busters.
	And there was one other person who left a tip on Friday that I didn't see because it wasn't here live or didn't respond to.
	But thank you very much for that on Friday.
	And so we did a repeat of some of the interviews on Friday, and I talked a little bit about Veterans Day and how we don't want to get trapped into these wars.
	And one of the reasons I focused on Sergeant York was because the original Veterans Day, of course, was a celebration to the end of World War I that ended on the 11th hour, the 11th day of the 11th month.
	And it was a war to end all wars.
	No, it wasn't.
	It was the beginning of endless wars.
	It was the beginning of useless wars to help establish a global government.
	That's what Woodrow Wilson was all about.
	Following that, they had the League of Nations.
	The guy was the quintessential globalist, if ever there was one.
	And in 1954, they renamed Armistice Day They renamed it Veterans Day.
	So it went for about a half a century as Armistice Day.
	And Matthew Ho on Counterpunch says, the name change says it all.
	You know, we're talking about an armistice.
	We're talking about peace.
	We're talking about the futility of war, the mindless horror of World War I. That's why there was so much resistance in America to getting involved in World War II. And when I talked about Sergeant York, who struggled with that, you know, he became a Christian when he was 27, and then he didn't get into the military until he was 31, but he really struggled with that.
	And I said at the time, Sergeant York would not have struggled with what to do if somebody had invaded Tennessee, or even the United States.
	It would have been clear to him what to do.
	That's why I say we really do understand that, at a fundamental level, that these entangling foreign alliances are not about defending ourselves.
	And, of course, just take a look at the border and you understand these people are absolutely not about defending anything about America.
	And when we talk about it being Veterans Day, as he pointed out, he said, you know, this kind of a change that happened in 1954 was really kind of reflective of a mindset.
	That we're going to have permanent wars.
	To remove the connection to, you know, this failed World War I, that we had absolutely, there's no reason for this thing to exist except for the petty grievances and the game of thrones that were being played by these leaders in Europe.
	And so to try to espunge any association with that Pyrrhic victory, they renamed it Veterans Day.
	We have battle lines are forming up in the Middle East and elsewhere.
	As Tom Luongo points out, he says, I've tried not to cover a great deal of detail about this because there's a lot of lies.
	Misinformation. And that is on both sides.
	I mean, you know, somebody sent an article to me and said they were debunking stuff, and it was not a picture that I'd seen.
	But it was purportedly a child holding up a bloody hand, kneeling next to the body of his mother, and the hand has six fingers.
	He's not a Nephilim. He's a creation of artificial intelligence, the telltale six fingers.
	But it's getting harder and harder to tell that stuff.
	And, of course, governments have been lying about what is going on.
	And, as I said, it's so complicated that it's there.
	The fog of war, both sides presenting their issues there.
	We don't understand what's happening.
	We should not be involved.
	And we understand, as all of the Americans are pointing out, the first thing we've got to do is we've got to go hit Iran.
	And isn't it interesting that this is what they've been after for the last 50 years of my life, is Iran.
	Iran is a creation.
	Of the American government.
	A blowback from the CIA. It goes back to the 1950s, the CIA coup.
	And then we, you know, Iran and Iraq and all these boundaries that were drawn there, all the boundaries in the Middle East pretty much are drawn after World War II. And, you know, not paying attention to certain ethnic groups.
	For example, they create Iran, they create Iraq.
	Iraq was largely the Babylonian people and Iran largely the Persian people.
	But the Medes, we call them the Kurds now, they were not really given a homeland.
	They were split up and divided between Iran and Iraq.
	And so they drew these lines because of geopolitics and how they could control oil and things like that.
	And it has sown the seeds of conflict.
	But whenever you have these conflicts...
	Whenever you have war, it's almost impossible to find out what the truth is.
	It's difficult enough to find it out when bombs are dropping, but especially because the governments are deliberately lying about what they're doing.
	And so my position on all this is let's just try to stop it and save as many people on both sides as we can because there are people on both sides who want this war to stop because they're going to be killed.
	I don't want the war to continue.
	I don't want to have a world war because I don't want to see bombs dropping.
	In my town.
	And that ought to be what we ought to be working for.
	But it always is, as Tom Longo says, he said, so we were told that Saudis flew planes in the World Trade Center.
	Three buildings fell with two planes hitting them.
	And so we had to go to war with Iraq and Afghanistan because the Saudis did something.
	And now we're told...
	That Hamas has slaughtered a lot of Jews, so now we've got to go to Iran.
	Kind of got an idea that whatever happens is going to be used by the military-industrial complex for their pre-set plans.
	They've already decided what they want to do.
	And again, when we look at Iran, yeah, Iran is evil.
	But you look at they're geographically created, politically created, and then politically recreated after there was a rebellion against the authoritarian rule that the United States set up under the Shah.
	And so, you know, that changed the religious landscape of Iran as well.
	Our CIA did in its ham-fisted interference.
	And so we've done them geographically, politically, religiously, economically, militarily.
	Iran is our creature, one way or the other, for better or worse.
	And so you ask yourself, okay, well, it's a big problem, so we've got to fix it now.
	How have we been doing for the last 50, well, 70 years in Iran?
	You think we're going to get it right this time?
	You think we've got better people there than we did in the 1950s up in Washington?
	Smarter people? No, I don't think so.
	And so a Marine vet on Veterans Day writing an op-ed piece on LifeSite says, well, our country faces an enemy within that rivals any foreign force.
	And it's growing. You know, when you look at the military, and you look at the five biggest, you know, bureaucracies or departments in the U.S. government, right?
	Four of the five are military.
	The number one, by the way, is the VA. We create a lot of casualties when we have a war, don't we?
	And they just keep going and going and going.
	So the VA is number one.
	Biggest number of employees in any department in the government.
	Number two is the Army.
	Number three is the Navy.
	Number five is the Air Force.
	What's number four?
	Department of Homeland Security.
	The organization that was set up to go to war with Americans.
	These other organizations, the Army, Navy, and Air Force, Right now, at this point, they're being used for the empire abroad.
	But Homeland Security is set up to go to war with Americans.
	And if we go back and we look at our mists of stay, Woodrow Wilson, Federal Reserve is a Christmas gift.
	And then the IRS, you know, the other gift that just keeps on taking from us.
	And then we got the weaponized IRS and Department of Homeland Security just exploding.
	Standing army here in America pointed at Americans.
	So, all three conflicts, writes Rhoda Wilson at Exposé News, all three conflicts, Ukraine, the Pacific with China, and then the broader Middle East war that they want to have.
	This is not just about Israel and Hamas.
	The U.S. government wants a full-on war in the Middle East.
	Yeah. Syria, Iran, all these places.
	The war in the Middle East will send fuel prices soaring, weakening already weak European economies, helping Russia.
	A U.S.-Iran war means U.S. resources already deployed against Russia will need to be poured into the Middle East, leaving China to dominate the Pacific.
	These people are not very good at geopolitics.
	You know what they're really good at? Democide.
	killing their own people.
	They really excel at that.
	We'll be right back. You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	If you like the Eagles, the cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSRadio.com.
	Some comments.
	I love this comment from Audi, Modern Retro Radio.
	Isn't it funny that as soon as the CIA was created, all of a sudden there were brutal dictators everywhere whose countries needed to be invaded?
	Yeah. Yeah, exactly right.
	Oh, yeah, that's exactly right.
	Just a coincidence. Matthew Ronson, permanent war means permanent profits.
	Yes, and KWD68 says the VA is its own government.
	Yeah, massive bureaucracy.
	Bigger than the Army, bigger than Navy, bigger than Air Force.
	A simple card for vets would save billions every year, and vets would have better care.
	But you've got to feed the bureaucracy.
	You're exactly right.
	And Mishigoose, thank you very much for the tip on Rumble.
	He says, okay, Tank, here's some dollars.
	And David Drives, we buy.
	Thank you very much. I appreciate that.
	Thank you. Comments about AI. MJ says, AI has to first overcome the lawsuits that are erupting all over the place to stop its illegal use of copyrighted information.
	Yeah, it's got to be, yeah.
	It's going to be very interesting.
	With AI, eventually, you'll be able, writes CPGB85, you'll eventually be able to make your own movies, and this is what Hollywood won't like.
	That's right. Yeah, it's going to change some of those things.
	Like I said, maybe the only positive thing that I can see so far, because for the most part, it's being used by the government, too.
	To data mine us, to spy on us, to surveil us, to do all the things that they had in East Germany.
	The Stasi had more than half the people spying on the remainder of the people.
	So they can do that now.
	They can automate that. That's going to be the worst thing about it.
	Because the people who are running the military-industrial complex and the academic complex that Eisenhower talked about, they are funding all the research.
	And they're using it as a weapon.
	Let's talk a little bit about what the government did this last week.
	Kind of broke on Wednesday and really escalated on Thursday after the show.
	And that was a guy that shows yet again how the FBI is still arresting people.
	Here we are, almost three years after January the 6th.
	And they're still SWAT teaming people, finding new people to arrest.
	Here is the news report of a quote-unquote fugitive that they were looking for for a couple of days.
	And I'll tell you what's really going on with that.
	FBI now searching a neighborhood in Helmeta, New Jersey, apparently on the hunt for a suspect in connection with the January 6th riot at the Capitol.
	Shannon Sohn is in Newscopter 7.
	Shannon, what do you know at this point?
	Well, this is a search that has been unfolding for the last several hours here in Helmeta.
	You are looking down at 131 Main Street.
	This is the home of the suspect they are searching for.
	Now, we do have a mugshot that we can show you.
	They are searching for 47-year-old Gregory Yateman.
	He is described as a white male wearing a red jacket and baseball cap.
	So since we have been over the scene, we've been watching the activity unfolding here in front It's amazing.
	amazing how big the search was community center this is a joint effort between the fbi and the local police so throughout this area you can expect to see this activity throughout the morning as the search continues for 47 year old gregory yamian in conjunction with his part in the january 6 riots Yeah, but here in Tennessee, we just had a guy with a rap sheet that goes back for years, violent crimes, all the rest of the stuff.
	The government just turned him loose.
	He's too mentally disturbed to stand trial.
	So we just put him on the streets and he shot an 18 year old girl, a student there in Nashville, stray bullet.
	I mean, he wasn't just shooting at some other people for whatever reason.
	But, you know, we can't put away violent criminals.
	Instead, you're going to get somebody who I don't know if the red jacket and cap was a MAGA thing or not.
	We wear the colors that the communists tell us to wear, which helps to hide what their agenda is.
	Everywhere else, they wear their red colors to show what they're about.
	But Gregory Yetman, a former military police sergeant, who got caught up in all this January the 6th stuff, and here we are nearly three years later, and they're still coming after people.
	They did catch him. Actually, he turned himself in.
	And what's interesting about this is all of the hype, and this is, his case is not the only one that happened last week.
	They're hyping these things.
	Oh, we got a manhunt going for fill in the blank, right?
	This is an effort to continue with this narrative that the people that were there on January 6th are such a threat.
	They're a bigger threat than any of the violent criminals that are being let out by these Soros prosecutors.
	They're a bigger threat than any of the cartel or traffickers or murderers or sexual predators that are coming through the open border unmolested and assisted and released into our country.
	No, no, no. The January Sixers are...
	Or a bigger threat. And again, it was so obvious that this is the way this is going to be used.
	It was a political persecution, and of course, it's going to be used to demonize an entire political movement, philosophy, all of that.
	It was all a setup.
	It was all a setup.
	So, they had a SWAT team.
	They had dogs.
	They They had a $10,000 reward to catch him, and you saw the big area that they were searching there?
	A spokesperson for the FBI said he would not be detained over the weekend in New Jersey due to observation of Veterans Day.
	Is that to honor him as a vet?
	Yeah, because then they turn him over.
	To the torturers in D.C. But it's so ridiculous.
	He turned himself in.
	Does he get the $10,000 reward for turning himself in?
	Oh, he's a dangerous criminal.
	They put a SWAT team against him, right?
	And they sent out a SWAT team, and he sees a SWAT team coming.
	He's a former military police officer, so he probably figured that he stands a pretty good chance of getting killed.
	So he ran away. And then two days later, two days later, they waited to do the big search that you see there, right?
	This person is such a threat to the community.
	And so they waited two days to do that.
	And even then, with that massive search, they didn't find him.
	He turned himself in.
	That's how dangerous he is.
	He was charged with assaulting, resisting and impeding officers, obstruction of law enforcement during a civil proceeding, entering and remaining in a restricted area, engaging in physical violence in a restricted area, and acts of violence on the Capitol grounds.
	Well, look, if he did anything, it's like I said about all these people.
	If they got violent, deal with it.
	But even for the people who are guilty of violence, these are excessive punishments.
	And we know what this is about.
	There's no question this is about politics.
	But the very fact that they go to his house on a Monday with a massive SWAT team.
	This is a guy who had already been interrogated, who was known by the FBI. They already knew who he was.
	And they do this massive SWAT team.
	He sees them. He escapes.
	They can't find him. But they don't even start looking at For two days.
	And they search for a day, and then he turns himself in.
	But they want everybody to be very scared.
	SWAT teams, heavy tactical gear, surveyed the region, the police use canine units to conduct the manhunt and deploy, flashbang grenades.
	Yeah, again.
	But the...
	Meanwhile...
	Murderers and cartel members are coming through the border unmolested, and perhaps terrorists as well.
	So this was something that was ginned up by a group called Sedition Hunters.
	He had already been interviewed by the press, and he said that he did not deploy any pepper spray on any officers, which is something he's accused of.
	He also said that he had been interviewed already by the FBI back in January of 2021, right after the event they interviewed him.
	He said everything's been resolved.
	Everything's good. And he said that in March of 2023.
	And then you've got this organization called Sedition Hunters.
	I guess they're kind of left-wing 4chan people or something.
	And they ginned up the FBI to come after him again.
	Kind of like what Darren Beattie is doing to Ray Epps, which, again, he's done it not only to Ray Epps, but he also did it to Stuart Rhodes.
	He did it to Enrique Terrio.
	Oh, they're feds. They're feds.
	Well, they're feds who are going to be sitting in jail unless they get this thing overturned on appeal.
	They're going to be sitting in jail for over 20 years or around that.
	Yeah, right. He even said that after they got charged.
	He said, they're charging them with the Civil War charge.
	He said, there's no way. No way.
	They overcharged them because they know that they're not going to be able to prove that.
	Well, it's corrupt. Darren Beattie's been wrong about everything.
	And Darren Beattie has used Ray Epps, whether or not he is a Fed agent.
	He has used him...
	To distract attention away from Trump, who drew everybody in there.
	And not just Trump, but also people like Bannon and Alex and all the rest of these people who pushed everybody there.
	It was pretty obvious what was going to happen.
	It was pretty obvious that the thing was going to be filled with agents provocateurs.
	And I said it over and over again and made the final warning that morning within a couple of hours that it all hit the fan.
	And I said, and then you know how this is going to be used against everybody as well.
	And so here is, you know, over, you know, back in January, he was interviewed and they said, you're fine to go.
	And now they keep pushing this, Sedition Hunters, kind of a left-wing equivalent of Darren Beattie at Revolver.
	So, again, you know, they say, well, the headlines, things like, you know, $10,000 reward offered.
	This January suspect, January 6th suspect, enters the third day.
	Well, they didn't even start to look for two days.
	But the headlines were about hyping this up for everybody.
	And even though the FBI looks like Keystone cops who kill, this is about hyping this up.
	This is a manhunt. This guy is dangerous.
	And they did it in Florida as well.
	Naples, Florida. A guy named Christopher Worrell who has connections with the Proud Boys.
	And the headline there is, he was arrested after a manhunt.
	And again, this is a guy who is known to everybody.
	But it's the media and the FBI hyping this up to create a sense of danger for everybody.
	Worrell is somebody in his 50s.
	And he was initially arrested after FBI agents executed a search and arrest warrant on his Naples home in March of 2021.
	So you're seeing a pattern here?
	A lot of people who were interviewed and searched and everything back in January or March of 2021, nothing was ever done.
	The point is, is that this is escalating.
	Why is it escalating?
	Well, because it's all political.
	This is a political persecution because this is part of the election cycle.
	To round up even more people and charge them and to try to make them look as dangerous as possible.
	More than 950 people have been charged in these two years.
	And so this local article, this is from Naples News in Naples, Florida.
	Who tipped off the FBI agents about Worrell?
	You mean they didn't know? You just said that they interviewed him in February, March of 2021.
	While awaiting his sentencing on August 18th, he suddenly went missing.
	He had been on house arrest after court records report that he complained about his treatment at the D.C. jail.
	He had been diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
	And so with all that, he just went on the lam.
	And again...
	This is, well, he's a proud boy, so he's got to be guilty of all this stuff.
	This is the insanity that we're seeing with all this.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to take a look at lockdown and how the repercussions of lockdown are still reverberating in the worst places, in China, in New York City.
	We'll be right back. Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing.
	Check out the jazz channel at APS radio.com and the APS radio app and leave the stress behind.
	The David Knight show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	Yes, and as Matthew Ronson says, J6 political prisoners are still being rounded up as Trump heads to his next campaign rally.
	Don't you feel sorry for Trump?
	I mean, these people have been rotting in D.C. jails, tortured and facing prison sentences of decades.
	And poor old Donald Trump, you know, he's had to make some court appearances, and he's living in Mar-a-Lago and flying around in his jumbo jet, private jumbo jet, and just left these people to rot in jail.
	People that he used and then threw under his bus.
	Honor Seeker says, Iran is our creature.
	It keeps getting worse every day at warp speed.
	And so is Fauci, our creature.
	So is the IRS. You see a pattern here.
	Yeah, absolutely. Distorted perceptions.
	How many people are mentally deranged from PSYOPs?
	We know they can control minds now.
	If they can aim them at targets, they can create demand for laws.
	What if the shooters are products of PSYOPs?
	Well... Absolutely.
	But let's talk about a little bit of the politics and the lockdowns behind these politics and so forth.
	As Christy was talking about the failures last Tuesday, and it is interesting, as I say, failure is an orphan.
	Nobody wants to blame Trump for this, especially.
	So everybody's trying to figure out who to blame.
	And Trump is right there at the front.
	He's going to find somebody else to blame.
	And Chris Christie blames Trump.
	I'm inclined to agree with Chris Christie.
	He says, Trump is electoral poison.
	Well, he is the father of the jab, and the jab is poison.
	He's the father of poison, the father of genetic code injections, the father of the jab.
	And Chris Christie says, Cameron failed in Kentucky because he sold his soul to Trump.
	He said, Daniel Cameron was a rising star in the Republican Party until he decided to throw his lot in with Trump.
	I mean, let's face it, Trump is political and electoral poison down-ballot.
	His endorsements have led to Republican defeats in the House and the Senate, in the House in 18, and in 20, we lost the U.S. Senate and the White House.
	In 2022, we underperformed miserably, and tonight, you're seeing us lose again.
	Daniel Cameron made a huge mistake by embracing Trump and selling his soul to him.
	And that's what he did. And the voters in Kentucky, a very red state, gave their verdict on politicians who sell their soul to Donald Trump.
	And so, again, you can't win if you've only got Republican backers.
	It's just that simple.
	But yeah, everybody's trying to find an excuse for this without blaming Trump.
	And so you have Ronna McDaniels, who is an RNC. People are trying to blame her and other things like that.
	But I think, really, it is the albatross around the neck of the Republican Party is the Don.
	But he doesn't think so.
	He says, Daniel Cameron lost because he couldn't alleviate the stench of Mitch McConnell.
	Or was it the Trump stench?
	Maybe it was both of them together.
	You see, that's the key issue.
	I think it's both of them.
	Cameron, who was backed by Trump, predicted that his victory would help to propel Trump to the White House next year, but his loss has Republicans pointing fingers in every direction because they don't want to point fingers at Trump.
	And so, Ronald McDaniel, others are blaming McConnell.
	And this is the way Breitbart puts it, because Breitbart is drinking the Kool-Aid now, big time.
	Never Trump Republicans are directly pointing to Trump.
	Well, you know, if you look at his history, you know, I see this all the time.
	People say, well, look at this meme out there.
	Donald Trump, four years and zero wars.
	Well, you're forgetting the war where he came against all of us.
	But I would change that to say four elections and zero wins.
	Because that's the effect that Trump has had.
	He's controversial. He's disliked by the majority of independents.
	And, you know, there are more Democrats than there are registered Republicans.
	And so you've got to have independents to win as a Republican.
	And he's poison on that.
	There's absolutely no doubt about that.
	But Donald Trump...
	Says, to quote him, he said, McConnell and Romney, how did Romney get into this?
	Are kryptonite for Republican candidates.
	Is Romney involved in that Kentucky election?
	I don't think so. He says, I moved him up 25 points, but the McConnell relationship was too much to bear.
	Yeah, it's never about him, you know.
	It's one connection that he has.
	He's just like Netanyahu.
	Netanyahu said, and clearly, you know, what happened in Hamas, you'd have to say.
	It was a failure of the intelligence services, the military services and everything.
	But when all that hit the fan, now there's a big fight between all this because they owned up and they said, all right, yeah, you know, there were failures made.
	We made mistakes. And then Netanyahu said, that's right, you made a lot of mistakes.
	I didn't make any mistakes.
	It's all you. So, things are not very good.
	Same thing that Trump would have done.
	Except Trump would have probably fired them and then given them all pejorative nicknames and hounded them.
	But not taken any responsibility.
	The buck does not stop with the leader.
	All those people worked for him.
	But they said, no, we told you, Netanyahu.
	But again, just like Trump.
	It's always other people's issues.
	Trump, by the way, when they had the debate last week, he had an in-person appearance.
	He addressed the Florida Freedom Summit.
	And as LifeSite News pointed out, LifeSite News is not drinking the Kool-Aid anymore.
	I think they saw the light with Trump when he said that a 15-week thing was too harsh.
	And because, again, you know, we're looking at France.
	They liberalized their abortion laws.
	They went from 12 weeks to 14 weeks.
	But, you know, for Trump, the stuff is too harsh.
	And it's a losing election.
	So, you know, throw the babies under the bus, along with the January 6th people who followed him into D.C., And so LifeSite News says Trump experienced a rare in-person rebuke over the weekend while addressing the Florida Freedom Summit.
	And this is actually not this weekend.
	It was the weekend before that. I've had this on my deck for a while here.
	And it's kind of like what happened with Fire Fauci, and he wouldn't do it, right?
	Fire Fauci, Fire Fauci.
	Oh, we'll see. You know, vote for me.
	Put me in. We'll see what I can do.
	Trump lamented during the remarks that his administration never got adequate credit for its, quote, great job on COVID. Well, I don't think it was a great job, but I do think that he hasn't been given the credit for the failure.
	And then he started a list of Republican governors that he, quote, let, unquote, quote, unquote, let keep their states open.
	You see? This guy...
	He's got a narrative that he's trying to excuse himself, just like Fauci.
	I didn't tell anybody what to do.
	I wasn't, you know, they were able to make their own decisions.
	I'm just making recommendations about stuff.
	And then, you know, giving people massive amounts of money or withholding the money based on what they do on those recommendations, you see.
	But he can't keep his ego in check.
	And so he has to say, well, I let some of these people open their states up.
	Well, if you let them open up your states, that means that you were in control of the lockdown.
	And so he goes on, he says, well, you know, we had Henry McMaster of South Carolina.
	He did a great job. And South Dakota, they did a great job.
	Tennessee, great job, a lot of them.
	They kept them open, right?
	And then he refused to say anything about Florida, which was the first one to open up.
	And people there started booing.
	Here's the clip. We had a lot of amazing successes.
	We did a great job in COVID. We never got the credit for the job we did.
	We let Republican governments keep their states open.
	Many of them did. Yeah, you let them.
	Henry McMaster, South Carolina, did a great job.
	South Dakota did a great job.
	Tennessee did a great job.
	A lot of them. They kept them open.
	No? No? He won't say.
	DeSantis did a great job.
	I will say this. Every Republican governor did much better than the best.
	Democrat, Governor, it's true.
	What they did... Oh, but he said just the opposite last week.
	Some of them was not too many, frankly, but some opened up pretty quickly.
	But the Democrats kept them closed like it seemed like forever in all instances, and they really did a terrible job.
	Crooked Joe puts China first, Russia...
	Yeah, well, there you go.
	Well, as I said, Lifesight.
	I said the fact that he said, well, I'll just, you know, won't say that Florida did a good job, won't say that DeSantis did a good job, even though they opened up before anybody else did.
	They should have never closed down, but they opened up first.
	But he had already said, crazy statement, that Cuomo had done a better job than DeSantis.
	This guy will say and do anything.
	He's just... Grifting, lying politician, if ever.
	And not even good at it.
	Not even good at it. So this concession represents a momentary climb down from his claim that DeSantis, whose national stardom is due in large part to a stand against COVID mandates.
	As a matter of fact, he's not just a star nationally.
	DeSantis, when he said, I'm going to run, I remember the papers in UK, the anti-lockdown people in UK, were very excited.
	I said, look at this, the guy who was the first one to open up, he's going to run, that's good, you know?
	Well, he said that DeSantis was worse during the pandemic than Andrew Cuomo.
	who was blamed for the largest number of nursing home deaths of any state.
	DeSantis, by contrast, says LifeSite, eventually saw even the left-wing Associated Press admit That the more restrictive policies of comparably sized states didn't save more lives than DeSantis' targeted approach that largely spared Florida the economic hardships of lockdowns.
	While the Democrats falsely accused his administration of manipulating data to explain away COVID numbers, they tacitly conceded that they were impressive at face value.
	And, of course, you saw the comparisons between, you know, Florida, New York, Florida, California, these various places.
	The latest in Trump's efforts to deny credit to DeSantis on one of his perceived greatest advantages, on an issue where Trump is considered uniquely vulnerable, given his administration's recommendations that states close schools, businesses, public gatherings, while mandating mask wearing and social distancing when out in public.
	And you heard him say that. You heard him say, well, I let the Republican governors open up.
	So, you made the Democrats stay locked down?
	This is a disease that has a distinction of what the political party in charge is?
	Because if it's a real pandemic, why would you make the distinction of letting some of them open up and some of them close down?
	And if you were the one saying they could open up, then you take responsibility for the closures as well.
	No, he paid everybody, including people like Newsom.
	Just like he paid Hillary Clinton to come to his daughter's wedding.
	He paid these people to do what Klaus Schwab wanted them to do.
	Anyway, without addressing his role on the White House Coronavirus Task Force, he said he's got no regrets of handling the crisis, and he doesn't have any problems with Fauci either.
	Because he did not fire Fauci.
	He claimed that he didn't have the ability to do that, and yet he was on the White House task force.
	He could have removed him from the task force.
	As a matter of fact, we know that he could have fired him as well because he fired the FBI, you know, two people in the FBI. One of them was the director.
	The other one was not the director.
	And so he could have fired him, but instead he kept him there and he gave him a medal for this very thing on the last day that he was in office.
	Gave Fauci a medal for warp speed.
	But the Trump bipolars, can't figure this out, the people who hate the lockdowns, who hate the jabs, They have this derangement.
	I call it bipolar. But take a look at what is happening in the aftermath of lockdown.
	I want to take a look at what's going on with China and with New York City.
	And of course, we've looked at how China is really struggling more than is reported here.
	And New York City is as well.
	New York City in post-COVID recovery, foot traffic has fallen 33%.
	And they said that the recovery rate of only 66% of where they were before the lockdown is the fact that this is an embarrassment now to a city controlled by radical leftists.
	You see, it's always going to be about owning the libs.
	The problem is that this was not strictly a lib policy.
	This was put on us by Republicans, and it was put on us by Trump especially.
	And so this policy, they want to forget the role of the GOP, and they want to forget that it needs to be rolled back.
	But what we saw is that only...
	Things online are essential, right?
	So the brick-and-mortar stores are having a problem with this, and they want to turn everything into a virtual prison.
	And you can see this if you look at what's happening in China.
	And I took a couple of short clips out of a 15-minute video that was looking at Guangzhou and at Shanghai.
	Guangzhou is a very western city, and we went there to adopt.
	My daughter was living in another area of China, but all adoptions had to go through Guangzhou because that's where the big U.S. embassy was and all the rest of the stuff.
	It wasn't located in Beijing in the capital.
	It was located in Guangzhou.
	And Shanghai, of course, got special treatment from Xi Jinping, and To extend his power and lock them down.
	So take a look at these pictures.
	And it was absolutely stunning.
	Karen was showing this to me.
	When we were there, we went to a city I'd never heard of before, Nanning.
	And it was a city of six million people.
	But it was a tiny city by Chinese standards.
	And I don't have any pictures of the traffic in the streets.
	I mean, it was just jam-packed.
	You know, we would look on the balcony of the motel and just look at the traffic and it's like, wow, this is some of the worst I've seen anywhere.
	And you had just almost like total anarchy in the roads because nobody really paid much attention to the traffic lights or anything like that.
	But everywhere we went, you know, we went to the Walmart.
	It was just like shoulder to shoulder, packed.
	We came back to America and it's like, wow, this place is like a ghost town compared to China.
	Everything was packed everywhere.
	Whether you went to the railroad station or you went to shopping or walking down the street or trying to drive in the car, everything was amazingly packed.
	Look at it now. Look here.
	Prime retail space for rent.
	All of these for rent.
	Prime retail space for rent.
	All empty. Nobody on the street.
	All the storefronts here are empty now.
	They used bustling shops when they first opened, but now they're all for rent.
	In a country with a population of 1.4 billion, there's no one on the streets, no customers in the stores.
	Where has everyone gone?
	What are we going to do with our physical stores?
	Now this is Shanghai.
	Now this is Shanghai.
	Many had hoped that with the end of the pandemic, the hard times would be over and there would be an opportunity to make up for the losses.
	However, it has now become clear that the pandemic was just the beginning of the difficulties.
	Workers are facing unemployment and salary cuts while business owners are struggling with a lack of customers, resulting in not just an inability to earn money, but also significant financial losses.
	Moreover, with China's economy continuing to decline and the increasing economic decoupling between Western developed countries and China, the future may be even more challenging for the Chinese people.
	Walking around the Bund in Shanghai, I suddenly realized that a lot of shops have closed down.
	It's such a shame.
	It feels like many shops in Shanghai can't survive this year.
	The economy is continuously going downhill, and many physical stores can't compete with online shopping.
	Yeah, see, the problem is that sometimes you get these spikes...
	They come into an economy.
	And even after you move, that initial impulse that's there, it continues to spiral down.
	And that's what we're seeing, especially in China.
	Now, it was Xi Jinping who did this completely politically in Shanghai to punish people.
	Do you remember when that was happening?
	Do you remember how people were recording videos at night of people howling in these skyscrapers?
	You know, just miserable that they were imprisoned.
	It was an open-air prison.
	And that's what they want for everybody.
	And as KWD68 says, Trump will be our great leader for our transition into freedom cities.
	Yeah, that's what this is really about.
	It's about a lot of different things converging with this.
	They can use it for universal basic income, you know, the stimulus checks and things like that.
	That was a massive spike that is still reverberating through the psychology of our culture.
	They're trying to get people to go back to work, physical work, and things like that.
	They don't want it.
	They've got a taste of that welfare state.
	And that's made a huge psychological difference.
	But it's also this impulse.
	And as I said before, going to war, as Trump did, with Main Street, you can see it more in China than you can here because it didn't last as long here.
	Why?
	Because we had local governments and state governments, and they could handle it differently.
	Whereas in China, everything is under the central control, the Chinese Communist Party.
	But still, nevertheless, the policies of Trump with lockdown, and he owns these lockdown policies, lock, stock, and barrel.
	It was completely him who did this.
	And the reverberations of that are still going.
	As I pointed out, in New York City, the office occupancy rates are at 48.9%.
	They were 100% before the pandemic.
	No, it's not a pandemic. They were 100% before Trump's quote-unquote solution to a non-existent pandemic.
	To a pandemic. To a pandemic.
	To kill everybody.
	But New York City is repellent by itself, and so you've got a lot of people who have left for more laissez-faire Florida.
	And so some of the businesses that were there were put out of business, many of them, by Trump.
	And the office occupancy rates are down.
	Of course, we've talked about this many times with Gerald Salenti.
	And now these chickens are continuing to come home to roost because it's just reverberating.
	And going on and on, this downward spiral.
	And in the places where they lock down so much.
	So Brownstone article says, does New York City 2020 make any sense at all?
	Did anything that they did in New York make any sense at all?
	And of course, it was the worst of all the places.
	But it was the same thing that was done worldwide to one degree or the other.
	And everybody did it. DeSantis did it in Florida to a lesser degree for a lesser period of time.
	But this is something that was global in its approach.
	Jessica Hockett on Brownstone says in a previous article we discussed a large spring 2020 spike in mortality reported for New York City.
	This spike comprises an extraordinary 26,000 unexpected deaths.
	Over an 11-week period, a much greater figure than would be expected based on experiences from the COVID outbreaks on the Diamond Princess cruise ship, as we explained in that article.
	Now, I didn't cover that article, but I did cover the Diamond Princess cruise ship that was stuck off of Japan.
	I think it was off the coast of Fukushima, I think.
	And I said, look, if all of this...
	What they did. They're not treating people who had respiratory illness and, you know, we had a guy who was, his specialty was these pandemics and he'd been at the Ebola outbreak and things like that.
	He went on board The Diamond Princess, he said, I was scared to death because he thought that it was going to be a very dangerous, fatal disease, and there was absolutely no protection.
	And we saw the fact that I think they had maybe a dozen elderly people who got sick and got no treatment and died out of something like 6,000 people.
	And when this guy who is an epidemiologist goes on board and said, they're not taking any precautions whatsoever, this place is just...
	Well, then, obviously, we don't need to lock down everything everywhere, right?
	So Diamond Princess was a very good example of that.
	And then you had a naval ship where the commander docked it, and then they docked him because he had one or two people that tested positive for COVID, and he freaked out.
	But, of course, nothing happened there because people there on that Navy ship were younger and in better health than the people who typically go on these cruises.
	Okay. But they said, when you look at this, you've got to say that something else is going on.
	Perhaps it was psychological effects.
	Perhaps it was neglect. Perhaps it was panic.
	Maybe it was the ventilators and the sedatives and the policies, or maybe it was iatrogenic harm.
	In other words, unintentional harm by physicians.
	You know, people, like I said, people are going to die under medical care.
	But this is beyond that.
	It was really their policies.
	It was really neglect. It wasn't just, you know, things happen with medicine and we do the best we can.
	No, no. It was a bed of lies.
	And so, in New York City, the official data would have us believe that over 26,000 more deaths than seen the previous year in New York City happened in a very brief 11-week period.
	And if you look at the chart of deaths in New York City, it's pretty much a flat line.
	It's got some noise on it. And then a massive spike for a very short period of time.
	There it is right there. Look at that.
	And so she says, well, there's a couple of things about this graph that make the data seem implausible.
	The increase in all-cause deaths was too rapid.
	The peak was too high.
	And the return to normal came too quickly.
	It seems unlikely that all of the factors that we mentioned in our previous article could have combined to produce a wave like this.
	And when you look at it, What did Fauci say?
	With an epidemic, you have a bell-shaped curve.
	And so what they're saying is, this isn't a bell-shaped curve, this is a spike.
	And so it should ramp up more slowly, and it should come down more slowly.
	And that's all the curve that Fauci was talking about.
	We've got to flatten the curve, right?
	Well, that's the curve that comes from Farr's Law that goes back to 1840s, and every sickness or epidemic has always followed that, that bell-shaped curve.
	This is not a bell-shaped curve.
	It's a spike. And so she says, there's something wrong with this.
	And she says, difficult to comprehend why there could only be six weeks of this.
	And stop and think about this.
	If this was a spike, and it only lasted for six weeks, then why'd they keep everybody locked down, right?
	The curve had been flattened.
	It wasn't a curve. It was a spike.
	And if it came back down to where it normally was, why did you keep people locked down for so much longer?
	So it's difficult to understand why it'd only be six weeks of excess deaths in a year that saw ongoing restrictions and closures and civil unrest and health care avoidance and all these other things.
	But again, it was something that even we found out in August when the American Hospital Association said, wait a minute, you said you're going to give us a 20% bonus to the CMS. And now you say you want proof?
	You told us at the beginning of this that you didn't have enough tests.
	And you said the ones that you had didn't work.
	You said to do a clinical diagnosis and you'd give us a 20% bonus.
	Now you're not going to pay up? And this bickering amongst thieves and murderers between the AMA, I'm sorry, not AMA, AHA, American Hospital Association, and CMS, the Medicare, Medicaid people, that public bickering was a big tell.
	I still haven't seen anybody else talk about that.
	But anyway, looking at the data, according to the official data, New York City experienced 34,000 deaths in a period of time when only 10,000 people would normally have died, resulting in an unimaginable 24,000 extra deaths.
	It seems unlikely that all the hospitals and the funeral homes in New York City could have handled three times their normal capacity for 10 weeks straight, let alone a peak That reached more than seven times normal.
	And through the rest of this article, she says, but if you look at the occupancy rate of the beds, if you look at how the utilization of ambulances and all the rest of the stuff, there's absolutely no way that this could have been the case.
	It just doesn't add up.
	In other words, they lied.
	She said, if these deaths did happen as recorded...
	And an observer with no knowledge of the pandemic narrative was asked to comment on what likely might cause this.
	They would say, well, it must have been some kind of a mass casualty event, such as an earthquake or an asteroid strike or a terrorist attack or a large release of a toxin or even a failure on the water treatment system.
	Or, you know, maybe it's just your government lying to you with statistics again, which they always do.
	And so she said there's a discrepancy between mortality and hospital activity.
	If, in fact, the daily all-cause mortality suddenly shot up to 738% above normal and then fell precipitously back to the baseline, we should expect to find evidence of this in the hospital records and in the ambulance dispatches.
	Sadly, unexpectedly, the data seems to imply exactly the opposite.
	The number of emergency department visits that you see there in red plummeted at exactly the same time you had this supposed peak.
	The total number of patients being transported by an ambulance also dropped, but not to that same extent.
	But furthermore, not only did emergency department visits drop, but outpatient visits also plunged substantially at the same time.
	Even inpatient admissions witnessed a moderate decline.
	We demonstrate this by looking at data for two particular hospitals, and Elmhurst and Maimonides, if I'm pronouncing that correctly, which received a lot of media coverage about being overrun with patients.
	And when that happened, I went back and I said, I looked this up, and I said, these same hospitals and these same news outlets, New York Post, New York Times, anything, had run these same stories a couple years earlier.
	We just don't have enough staff and we don't have enough beds and we need more money.
	And they recycled all those stories.
	And you had people like Jason Goodman and others who were going around and, you know, can I see inside?
	Oh, you can't see inside that. Go away, go.
	And they're out there, you know, smoking a cigarette or whatever, the hospital administrator chasing them off, going to call the police on them.
	They weren't doing, they were empty.
	We had a video out of Brazil, I remember.
	And you had everybody in the ICU unit.
	And they're all masked up.
	And all the beds are covered with curtains.
	And you have this woman who goes over.
	They film the video. And they've got masks on.
	She pulls back the curtain. There's nobody there.
	She goes to another bed. Pulls back the curtain.
	Nobody there. Continues to go around the room.
	All the beds were empty.
	During the 10-week spike of mortality, 21,000 deaths occurred in hospitals.
	This is 15,000 more deaths than expected, based on the baseline average.
	Are we to believe that at a time when emergency visits plunged from 12,000 a day to less than 5,000, when ambulance transports dropped from about 3,000 to 1,500 per day, and outpatient and inpatient visits also tanked, That you still had 15,000 extra people suddenly die in hospital?
	See, the problem is, as they frequently say, liars don't have a good enough memory to be good liars.
	Eventually, there's some detail that you get caught up in, that you, you know, contradict yourself in, or something like that.
	And for the government to lie with its statistics, their problem is, is that they keep so many numbers and so many different statistics in so many different places that They can't remember to change them all.
	And so when they tell you, yeah, we had this massive spike in people who died, well, first of all, you sanity check that and say, that doesn't make any sense.
	You couldn't have had it increased by a factor of seven and have it very narrow.
	We've never seen that before.
	Every time, that's the fundamental rule of epidemiology that you got the curve.
	And then when you say, oh, and all this happened at a time when, you know, the emergency visits plunged from 12,000 to 5,000 a day, and the transports dropped from 3,000 to 1,500 a day, and yet you got 15,000 extra people dying in the hospital.
	How'd they get into the hospital? So they're simply lying.
	They were lying about all this stuff.
	Bed occupancy levels in New York City hospitals showed only a minor increase and never reached capacity.
	The reason behind why these graphs start abruptly on March the 26th, 2020, is that the data is suspiciously unavailable for any dates before this.
	They flushed it down the memory hole.
	Kind of the same thing that happened with the military.
	The military is looking for any evidence of a chemical or biological warfare attack, so they keep very detailed records.
	And when you had some military doctors point out that a wide range of diseases were going up from anywhere from two to six times what they had seen in the previous five years as a baseline.
	The Pentagon comes out and says, well, those previous five years, the data, you can't trust that.
	You know, we're just going to change all that.
	And what they did in New York, they just erased all that information so they wouldn't have to explain it.
	Despite the glaring omission, however, it is still possible to observe that there is no evidence of hospitals being overrun with patients during the phenomenal spike of the number of deaths because they still have that.
	They still see that, you know, They had one-fifth the number of admissions, and they had one-half of the emergency transports with ambulances and all the rest of this stuff, and empty beds as well.
	The city's public hospital system showed a marked decline in Elmhurst's ICU occupancy rates during the spring wave.
	At the risk of being repetitive, we're to believe that 15,000 extra deaths occurred in New York City hospitals while the total bed occupancy levels dropped.
	It is also possible that beds were empty because so many dead people were being discharged.
	But the problem with this explanation is that since COVID is given as the leading cause of death during the spike, and since COVID hospitalizations began about the same time as the spike in mortality, the only way for discharges to remain ahead of occupancy, bed occupancy, is if those that died remained in the hospital bed for less than a day.
	However, official data tells us that the median duration of hospitalization was six days for COVID patients or eight days for those who died.
	And so for all this to work, you'd have to, you know, people get in and immediately die and they take them out again.
	But that wasn't happening.
	Furthermore, COVID patients regularly survived three weeks before dying.
	Why then the massive spike in mortality not reflected in bed occupancy levels?
	Well, because they lied, and then they lied about those lies, and they lied about some other things, and they lied about all, the whole thing was a lie.
	The magnitude and the shape of the spring mortality curve, it's not a curve, it's a spike, is significantly worse than what had happened in any other U.S. metropolitan area in addition.
	See, they were lying about everything in New York.
	And I interviewed pandemic nurse.
	She wrote a book about it.
	She said, I was in Florida and we weren't seeing any of this stuff.
	I kept hearing how bad it was in New York City, so I thought, well, let me go up there and help them.
	And she goes up and she tells them I'm here.
	She said, I waited several days before anybody told me to come in.
	I thought, that was really strange if it's an emergency.
	Don't you want all hands on deck?
	And then when she went in and the doctor was showing her around, you know, he's telling her, yeah, most of these patients on the ventilator, you know, 90% of them are going to die and all the rest.
	And she said she saw no pandemic whatsoever.
	You had, again, the 2,500-bed Army Field Hospital, and you never saw it.
	You saw the pictures of it when it was set up, and you saw the empty beds, but you never saw any pictures of anybody in those beds.
	Trump sent a hospital ship to New York City.
	He sent another hospital ship to L.A. Then they went home because they had no patients.
	You had Franklin Graham put in Samaritan's Purse, and he had a big operation there as well.
	They quietly packed up and went home.
	And all of those people...
	You know, from Trump and his hospital ships to Franklin Graham, all of them knew that there was nothing happening there.
	They didn't write a book like Pandemic Nurse did.
	They covered it up.
	They didn't tell you that there was no pandemic.
	The magnitude, the shape of this is worse than it was in any other city as well.
	And so, really, to sum it up, here's several points that she made in this, and I didn't go into all the details on all of them.
	Number one, it's unlikely that COVID contributed to the medical deaths, the iatrogenic and other factors.
	It is, number two, implausible that every age category should experience a spike in the deaths simultaneously.
	It is improbable, number three, that deaths occurred simultaneously and independent of the place of death.
	Number four, the magnitude and the steepness of the spike in the deaths is indicative of an unparalleled non-natural mass casualty event, but no such event was detected.
	A seven-fold increase, a very narrow period of time.
	Records of hospital visits and ambulance transports don't correlate with what would be expected.
	As a matter of fact, they contradict that.
	Occupancy levels of hospital and ICU beds are not what one would expect with a wave of death happening.
	What happened in New York City is significantly worse in similar cities in the U.S. and far too many younger people reported to have died in a very short period of time and to have died from COVID.
	In other words, everything about it was a lie coming out of New York.
	But of course, Trump said Cuomo did a better job than DeSantis.
	And so what was his job?
	Was DeSantis' job to sell a non-existent pandemic?
	Because in that, he certainly did do a better job than DeSantis did.
	Cuomo did the best job of anybody in terms of selling Trump's pandemic lie, which is actually the lie of the World Health Organization and the World Economic Forum and the rest of these globalists.
	And so you can understand why they wouldn't want to have a debate.
	And even as you've got a Thanksgiving family forum, the Republican National Committee...
	Is telling anybody who goes to this Thanksgiving dinner, any candidate in Iowa who goes to this Thanksgiving dinner, well, you're going to be excluded from all the further RNC debates.
	Because they don't want to have any debates.
	They don't want to talk about issues.
	They'd rather talk about, is this guy wearing elevator shoes?
	Yeah, that type of thing.
	Of course, nobody is clean in any of this.
	Everybody took a stab at the public and the murder on the Orient Warp Speed Express.
	But in Iowa, an influential Christian conservative leader, this is Bob Vander Plaats, Wanted to have a Thanksgiving family forum in Iowa.
	They've done this in the past.
	Candidates who accepted would not be standing up behind a podium and making speeches.
	Instead, they would be encouraged to gather around tables and be asked questions directly by the people there.
	But that was too much of a debate.
	You don't want to have the public actually able to ask questions of the candidates or have the candidates interact with each other without a very controlled environment that the RNC wants to have, where you're going to be asked the same questions that you get asked every four years.
	And you give the same answers.
	No one is going to show up.
	Because if they want to keep on participating in the debates that will be pushed by the Republican National Convention, they're not going to be allowed.
	You had Ramaswamy and Chris Christie had agreed to face off in a debate, in a miniature debate, on Fox News with Brett Baer.
	And the RNC moved in very quickly to shut that down.
	No, no. Only the debates that we control.
	That's how bad this is.
	And as I said, you think we have free elections?
	Well, then you don't understand how ballot access is controlled in this country.
	Controlled by the two major parties.
	And you don't understand the fact that debate access is very controlled.
	And now, this is a new level of debate control that's being instituted by the RNC under Romney's niece or something that's running this, Rona McDaniels.
	It's come to the attention of the RNC Council's office that several Republican candidates have been invited to participate in an open press event in Iowa in November, at which they would gather around the table to have a moderated, friendly, and open discussion about issues.
	In other words, a debate.
	You can't have a debate, says the RNC. We're not going to let you do that.
	We've got to carefully control the narrative.
	It's a form of censorship, isn't it?
	Citing a pledge signed by each of the candidates, the RNC counsel, the lawyer, said, please be advised that any Republican presidential candidate who participates in this or other similar events will be deemed to have violated this pledge and will be disqualified from taking part in any future RNC-sanctioned presidential primary debate.
	You see, the political parties are very, very, very effective means of control of our elections, which nobody wants to talk about.
	They control the ballots, they control the debates, and within the party, this allows for a very centralized, top-down control of even who the candidates are going to be, because if the party doesn't like you, they can make sure that you don't win.
	Like many social conservatives, Vander Plaats appreciates the accomplishments of the former President Trump.
	In an interview with CNN, he pointed to the Supreme Court justices whom Trump nominated and who overturned Roe v.
	Wade. But at the same time, he says he thinks that voters feel exhausted by Trump.
	That's one way to put it.
	Iowa, he says, is tailor-made to upend Trump.
	He says if he loses Iowa, there's a competitive nomination process.
	But if he wins, I think it's over, he said.
	And so as all this is happening, you've got the media, again, coming after Trump and poking him and getting him more and more angry, more and more reactionary.
	And, of course, he's made a lot of statements that are very reactionary.
	I was disappointed, frankly, to see that the new American is now drinking the Kool-Aid, the Trump Kool-Aid.
	This is the headline. Media stokes fears of Trump's alleged master plan to become a dictator.
	This is by Luis Miguel, who I've interviewed on the border.
	He's very good. But where were they?
	Where was the new American during 2020?
	Trump was a dictator.
	Trump did enact medical martial law.
	He did lock us down.
	He did suspend the Constitution.
	He did even before that.
	Tell the ATF that they could do gun control by executive order.
	Even banned not just bump stocks, but he banned pistol braces.
	Began that in 2019.
	And then, because he's getting a lot of pushback from the NRA, he finally backed off of that in December of 2020, after the election.
	And so, the way it's reported by the New Americans, unfortunately, at least in this article from this author, are drinking the Trump Kool-Aid.
	The danger stems from the left's dedicated efforts laying the groundwork to depict Trump and his supporters as would-be founders of a dictatorship.
	Well, you know, when you look at what he's done, and when he says this is his revenge tour, you ought to believe him.
	And you ought to look at what the guy actually did.
	Media stokes fears of Trump becoming a dictator again.
	Yeah. Make Trump a dictator again.
	That's a way to change the MAGA thing, too.
	Or if we have Trump for a second term, we could just change the spelling of great.
	G-R-A-T-E. You know?
	As in grinding your teeth because of this guy being there yet again.
	Eric, thank you very much for the tip on Rockfin.
	I appreciate that. And Garrett Carpenter, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that. Harp says...
	Harp's in Australia. Good to see you there.
	He says the only pledge they should be taking is to uphold the Constitution.
	That's right. And that's...
	But, you know, again, it's this...
	These political parties are means of control, and they have corrupted and controlled the elections for a very long time.
	And this is how the system works, and people need to understand this, how the system works.
	Even if you look at the unique wrinkles that were added in 2020 in terms of election corruption, the ballot shenanigans and things like that, that was done because Trump locked us down.
	That's part and parcel of the lockdown, and they're keeping it in place.
	You know, We're not walking around with masks anymore.
	They're trying to reimpose it in some of these places, but, you know, we still are being masked with these election rules that Trump put in place and nobody's pulling them back out.
	Georgia boy 1142, Trump could build a FEMA camp on Fifth Avenue when nobody would care.
	That's right. And shoot people dead there.
	Michigan goes, they researched and knew that if they closed down businesses, many would go out of business.
	One of my favorite restaurants is gone now.
	That's right. I mean, you know, people...
	You work so hard, you pour everything into it, your blood, sweat, tears, all your money is in it, and then they just starved him.
	I still can't believe that it happened when I go back and look at it.
	Just the most amazing thing, that he was able to get away with that.
	And they don't want to hold him responsible.
	Media is making people afraid that he's a dictator.
	He was a dictator!
	He was a dictator the entire last year he was in there.
	And even before that, again, with the gun control stuff, which we're going to talk about when we come back, distorted perceptions.
	It says there is a one-world plan coming, one-world currency, one-world government, one-world religion.
	Sounds good, but it comes down to no individuality.
	Smart cities and freedom cities, same thing.
	Yeah, I agree. It doesn't sound good to me, quite frankly.
	I've been hearing all this stuff for a very long time, and none of it sounds good to me.
	All this, you know, is a kumbaya thing for the Star Trek crowd.
	I remember the UN selling this stuff in the early days in the 1960s when I was a kid.
	Even then, I thought, I don't think so.
	About China, Jason Parker says, I remember the government bolting people into their apartments and allowing them to starve to death.
	Yeah, absolutely. Yeah, the pictures of them, they would drill a hole.
	They'd have a concrete slab in front of their door.
	They would drill a hole in the concrete, and they'd put like a metal bar there so they couldn't open the door.
	It's just amazing what they did.
	And the way they weaponized it in Shanghai, the most western, the most prosperous area, they had to teach them a lesson.
	Yeah, that's exactly what Mao did.
	And they ran, you know, one of the reasons why it's so empty there, a lot of people had gone there because it was a bustling economic area, and all the people who were not Chinese are out of there now, not putting up with this again.
	And even the people, so many stories about people in China who had moved to the big city, to Shanghai, because they were going to get high-paying jobs and be economically prosperous.
	And they got out and they've gone back to work a menial task, even though they've got a college degree or they're working on some kind of, you know, Wall Street type of high-paying job.
	They said, I'm not putting up with this again.
	I'm getting out of the city.
	I'm getting into the countryside.
	Gonzo Johnny says, that was worldwide.
	Empty hospitals here in the Netherlands, too.
	Yeah, we saw all the images of literal puppets in hospital beds.
	Yes. KWD-68, they moved those mannequins to Ukraine for war footage.
	Store them in here. Because, you know, it's all about killing us, isn't it?
	We'll be right back. Looking for better information?
	APSRadioNews.com features articles and commentary,
	along with audio from all the top news from around the world. APSRadioNews.com. APSRadioNews.com along with audio from all the top news from around the world. APSRadioNews.com. APSRadioNews.com
	APSRadioNews.com
	next move. . . .
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Yeah, Jason, you're right.
	The virus was not the plan.
	The response and the vaccine were.
	That's right. That was what they practiced for 20 years.
	Locking everybody down and rushing a vaccine out and forcing everybody to take it.
	Just like the full-body scanners sitting in the warehouses before the TSA. Yeah, before they had the underwear bomber.
	All right. It happens just before Christmas, and already they've got the body scanners already done, sitting in the factories, and you've got Chertoff, who was the first Homeland Security guy, and it's just, hey, you have a problem?
	We've already got the solution.
	And they're already made, and they're sitting in the warehouse.
	Isn't that convenient? Such a coincidence.
	Well, this was sent to me by Robert.
	Thank you, Robert. He says, the CDC reports the highest childhood vaccine exemption rate ever.
	You know, maybe it's a lot of people looking at this thing here, you know, which says, oh, we've got the new normal is now we've got to screen kids for heart disease.
	Sudden cardiac arrest screening for children.
	Now the number one killer of high school student athletes.
	Perfectly normal, right?
	And now we've got a foundation for all of this stuff, the Heartbeat of Champions Foundation already.
	Boy, that was fast, wasn't it?
	I mean, we've never seen anything like that before, but now they've got foundations that have been set up.
	They're going to completely normalize it, just like they did autism.
	Well, let's have some support groups for autism.
	Fine. Help people with it.
	Maybe we could look at the cause.
	If we look at the cause, maybe that might help us to figure out some way that we could ameliorate it.
	But no, let's have a foundation and we'll hold events and we'll give medals and awards to people who are struggling with this and been able to overcome this obstacle.
	But we're not going to help them physically.
	And we're not going to stop doing it.
	Well, a lot of people are saying, not with my kid.
	There is a rising distrust in the healthcare system.
	It's not a pediatrician in North Carolina.
	The CDC report found that 3% of children entering kindergarten during the 2022 school year, 2022 to 2023, were granted a vaccine exemption from their state, the highest exemption rate ever reported in the U.S. Forty states saw rises in exemptions.
	In 10 states, Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Idaho, Michigan, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, Utah, Wisconsin...
	In those states, the exemption rate soared over 5%.
	What's the matter with Tennessee?
	Come on, guys. You've got to get it up.
	Just three years ago, only two states had an exemption rate of more than 5%.
	Idaho was a standout in the new report.
	More than 12% of children entering kindergarten in that state had a vaccine exemption in 2022.
	The trend appears to coincide with doubts about the COVID vaccines.
	See, that's the silver lining in all this stuff.
	You know, parents finally...
	Getting a grip and understanding what this vaccine industry has been about all along.
	But this article was written because they're very concerned.
	They said, well, you know, we've got this magic number of 95% of everybody's got to get the shots or the shots don't work.
	See, that's the lie.
	That's the lie that's been there with the flu, been there with measles, been there with everything.
	It's this herd mentality.
	I think it's spelled out a number of different ways.
	You know, people acting like they're a bunch of sheep.
	Or, I heard it on the news.
	I heard it on the grapevine.
	People are hearing it on the grapevine.
	It's why they're not getting the shots.
	But they heard it on the official networks from the authorities that you've got to get your shots.
	And everybody's got to get their shots.
	And we've got to stop this. Well, people aren't buying that anymore.
	And we have now shown that the emperor has no clothes.
	And that these...
	These people have been selling us a very dangerous, poisonous solution for quite a while.
	But this was sent to me by another listener.
	Aaron, thank you for this.
	He took a screenshot.
	I was able to find the commercial.
	They're now running commercials.
	They're so desperate because nobody wants their poison.
	So this is a Moderna commercial.
	And, of course, they call their thing Spike Vax.
	I thought that was really funny. But I've known about that for some time.
	He did not know about it.
	He said, I didn't know they were calling the spike vax.
	I knew that, but I didn't know they had a commercial out.
	This is how they're trying to sell this thing now in 2023.
	When it comes to your health, you do you.
	You ping and pong that body.
	You plunge that body.
	This is for the really stupid people.
	You make it rain that body.
	You flu shot that body.
	And now, you spike vax that body.
	Because even though the pandemic is over, COVID-19 isn't.
	Spike vax by Moderna is a vaccine to help protect you against COVID-19.
	You shouldn't get spike vax if you've had an allergic reaction to spike vax or its ingredients.
	Rare cases of inflammation of the heart, muscle, and outer lining have been reported.
	That's called myocarditis and pericarditis.
	Make vaccination against COVID-19 a part of your health routine.
	SpikeVax that body with SpikeVax by Moderna.
	They left out the blood clots and they left out the mental neurological issues, sterilization issues, the concentration in the reproductive organs.
	They kind of left that stuff out.
	By the way, I love that phrase they put in there.
	Don't take this if you're allergic to it.
	How do you know you're allergic to it?
	Until you take it.
	And there's a lot of people that they know are allergic to it because they put in the pegylated, you know, lipid nanoparticles.
	They encased them in stuff that a lot of people are allergic to.
	A lot of people, and they knew that as well.
	The pegylated stuff.
	But anyway, yeah, that's for the real low information.
	Audi MR, Modern Retro Radio.
	I saw Vax ads on TV recently and on YouTube.
	Desperate indeed. Yeah, they are desperate.
	You've got to be desperately uninformed to fall for that kind of garbage.
	Vivek the Snake Ramaswamy.
	China must pay for unleashing hell on the world with the coronavirus pandemic.
	Wow. Well, you know, now you know where this guy is coming from.
	I've been saying this for quite a while.
	It is a big tell, isn't it?
	When you see people like the snake, or Vivek the snake, and Rand Paul, and they're saying, China did this, China did it, or Trump, you know, the Wu flu, they did it to us, right?
	These people are doing dog whistles for the military-industrial complex who wants war with China.
	And they're also doing it as a red herring to throw everybody off the scent of who really did it to us, which was our own government and Trump and Biden.
	So it's a big tell when they do this.
	And of course, RFKJ is doing it as well.
	All these people.
	Let's not take a look at, you know, what really was done here, but let's take a look at the lab.
	And, you know, let's move attention away from the vaccine that's killing everybody.
	So he accused the Communist Party of unleashing hell on the world, and he said, China owes the planet a debt.
	Well, you know, it was Trump who unleashed hell on the world with his genetic code injection poison.
	And by the way, Vivek the Snake wanted to make money off of this as well.
	He was there as part of DeWine's COVID committee, and he was pushing to get a surveillance contact tracing thing.
	So he added... The surveillance wing of this thing.
	I don't trust that guy at all.
	At all. But he says, my message, this is Ramaswamy, my message to Xi Jinping is this.
	You're done buying land in this country.
	You will not donate to universities in this country.
	U.S. businesses won't expand into the Chinese market until you play by the same set of rules.
	You're kicked out of the WTO, and you actually have to have accountability for the COVID-19 pandemic financially, which unleashed hell on the world.
	Again, he's doing this as a dog whistle to the military-industrial complex, who really, they love Nikki Haley, and he wants to be their guy.
	And so that's his dog whistle to them.
	You know, I showed the pictures of the empty shops and everything.
	By the way, thanks to Ian, who sent that.
	90%. Of the shops are empty in Shanghai and Guangzhou.
	Even worse than New York City.
	New York City, it's like half of them are empty.
	The occupancy rate in the offices is half.
	But 90% are gone in Shanghai and other places.
	Now, in Texas, you've got Governor Abbott signing a bill to ban private employer vaccine mandates.
	Well, better late than never.
	It is pretty late.
	They did say, State Senator Mays Middleton out of Galveston, who sponsored it, said, This is the most comprehensive ban on COVID vaccine mandates in the nation.
	It's five times stronger than Florida's bill, which is the next strongest.
	Well, I think there's only two. And, of course, that was done years ago.
	When Abbott and the Republicans in Texas did nothing.
	But I'm glad they're doing something about it.
	Abbott said, it's long past time to put COVID behind us.
	Yeah, yeah. It's long past time to shut down these usurpations of authority under color of law and do it once and for all.
	Hospitals can have the ability to not mandate the vaccine, and they can do PPE requirements instead.
	Well, again, the mandates were being put on to the hospitals by CMS, by Medicare and Medicaid, saying, we are not going to pay you anything, anything.
	First, they laid the trap.
	Right? And 2020 said, you say these people are sick with COVID and you kill them and we'll give you extra money to do that with remdesivir and with the ventilators.
	And so we'll give you bonuses for that.
	We'll give you a 20% bonus for everything that you do charge them for in the hospital if you say they've got COVID. And then after the hospitals were just getting that massive windfall, then they came around the next year.
	And CMS, Medicare, Medicaid, said, all right, now you're going to vaccinate your staff.
	And if you don't, you're not going to get one cent of Medicare, Medicaid.
	Well, that's huge. That's huge.
	So that's the way this all works.
	It works with money.
	It works with getting people hooked on free federal money.
	Massive, massive quantities of it.
	And then there, you own them.
	Because now they are addicted to that money.
	Now that they're dependent on it, they've expanded and all the rest of the stuff, and now they need that money.
	And he said, now I'm going to pull that away if you don't do this next thing I want you to do.
	Jackie Schlegel, founder of Texans for Medical Freedom, a major advocate for the bill, said that while some may argue that the law doesn't go far enough, it's an important first step to return individual liberties back to Texans.
	She said she was contacted by three different nurses, Who said because of this bill they would return to nursing.
	Because they have a massive nursing shortage, especially in Texas.
	Houston Methodist was one of the companies that made corporations that made a big issue out of this nationally.
	Many of my clients actually contracted COVID as a result of treating COVID-positive patients.
	And the thank you that Methodist Hospital gave them was to give them a pink slip if they wouldn't take the vaccine, the experimental vaccine, which people in medicine know.
	They should have tried the thing that they did in New Zealand.
	We will. We'll give you doctors and health professionals.
	We'll give you a pass on this stuff.
	And you don't have to get the vaccine because you're essential.
	Within two years, many Texas hospitals and medical facilities are facing shortages because of the vaccine mandates.
	But the Supreme Court has not been any help in any of this stuff.
	They've upheld the mandates for health care workers.
	And, you know, so much for their ideas about freedom.
	In Saskatchewan, you have a nurse there, Leah McGinnis.
	The College of Registered Nurses is coming after her for spreading misinformation.
	They said, you know, she doesn't agree with what we're putting out here.
	So that's misinformation, and you've got to be taken away.
	Meanwhile, you have Tedros of the WHO. It's complaining that there's not enough censorship going on online.
	There's people out there with conspiracy theories because he's running a conspiracy.
	And I don't have any theories about the WHO being a conspiracy.
	I have a lot of facts about it being a conspiracy.
	They admit, quite frankly, that they are part of a conspiracy.
	You know, it kind of works out like this.
	But this isn't the place to talk about it.
	It's nice you can. Thank you.
	Come on. Yeah, I drive.
	Yeah, El Hydra.
	It's coming straight from Klaus.
	So, as Reclaim the Net says, given the fervor of Tedros' crusade against disinformation, quote-unquote, if one didn't know any better, one could hardly guess that he is at the helm of the UN's health agency, the World Health Organization, rather than running some ministry of truth.
	Then again, given his own and WHO's role in the disastrous pandemic, When those who are to blame at the national and international level discovered misinformation as a way to discredit any criticism, it's not surprising.
	And, of course, that's all this is.
	And so he's put out this post saying, some argue that this treaty that they're putting will undermine a country's sovereignty by giving power to the World Health Organization.
	They claim that the World Health Organization will be able to impose lockdowns or vaccine mandates on countries.
	Yes, they will. It's going to give them legal authority.
	They've done this through the rules.
	To say these things are going to be binding and they're going to have to do it.
	And, of course, if the WHO says you've got a pandemic, well, then, you know, you're going to have to do things to satisfy the World Health Organization, you know, like vaccinating all your citizens as Netanyahu made the Faustian bargain with Pfizer to do.
	We'll turn our citizens into lab rats, but you give us the vaccine so that we can travel to and from.
	So, again, he is calling anybody who questions his treaty.
	Where he wants more surveillance tools, more controls, and a centralized designation of pandemics and to make it biding on people.
	Well, those people have to be shut down.
	So, the fight continues to ban face masks in the UK because they are now coming up again.
	And so, an organization that has arisen in the UK to push back on the face mask stuff sent a thing to the health leader there and said, here's two things, and they're kind of mutually exclusive and contradictory.
	First of all, there's your guidance.
	About what people should do, and in that you say the masks don't work, and then you got another letter about the fact that locally people can ignore the reality of all this.
	This organization said, well, based on the content of these two papers, the, quote, matter for local discretion, unquote, argument to condone the mass masking The scientific evidence pointing to the ineffectiveness of masks as a viral barrier,
	together with the range of harms associated with them, renders this response inadequate and bordering on irresponsibility as it perpetuates a postcode lottery.
	Where patients in some localities have to endure a sub-optimal service because the actions of a few monofocus local infection control personnel.
	Yeah, exactly right.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to take a look at some updates, quick updates with the pistol braces, and we also want to take a look at what is happening with CBDC and some interesting updates as to what is happening with gold.
	We'll be right back. Using free speech to free minds.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
	From country to blues, classic hits to news, APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
	All right, well, we had a couple of court decisions to slap the ATF back into the line and the Biden administration, the Fifth Circuit Court, on Wednesday.
	Put out an injunction halting the ATF's enforcement of the pistol brace rule that they created.
	It was enacted earlier this year, but of course, what they don't say in the Zero Hedge article is the fact that pistol brace things started under Trump in 2019, ran against, the NRA fought that.
	They didn't fight. The bump stock.
	Gun owners of America did.
	They said this is not an important thing.
	The bump stock is not important, but the principle is important.
	And they were right about that because the NRA did nothing about that.
	And so immediately then Trump and the ATF go after pistol braces.
	They fought him on the pistol braces.
	And then when he is trying to rally support after the election, he got rid of the pistol brace, but then it was immediately restarted by the Biden administration.
	And now you've got an injunction across the country from a judge.
	So they were likely to appeal this ruling by the Fifth Circuit Court and, And then the next win for gun owners was, that was on Wednesday.
	Then on Thursday, a three-judge panel out of New Orleans, Fifth Circuit Court, sided with gun owners, gun rights groups, and manufacturers in declaring that the ghost gun rule of 2022 is unlawful.
	And in that rule, the ATF Redefined what a firearm is, what a frame is, what a receiver is.
	Do you understand what they're doing with this color of law stuff?
	First of all, you're doing gun control by executive order.
	You're doing gun control by bureaucracy.
	And you're violating constitutional protections of our God-given rights that it used to take.
	We're accustomed to those rights being violated by the legislature.
	Then you had the unelected judges violating those rights, and now you've got the agency itself, which is always looking to expand its little empire.
	Now the agency, the ATF, the unconstitutional agency, the ATF, is now expanding all that.
	But the way that they're doing it is to change definitions, and this is the way that they attack everything.
	What is a woman? What is a firearm?
	Well, we'll let you know. We're going to change that definition of all this stuff.
	They use the language to seize the moral high ground when it comes to arguments, but they really do use the language when it comes to subverting the law and the Constitution.
	In writing for the Fifth Circuit panel, Circuit Judge Kurt Englehart said the ATF rule flouts clear statutory text and And exceeds the legislatively imposed limits on agency authority in the name of public policy.
	And, of course, they do that by playing word games and changing definitions from what we already know.
	What is a firearm? We know what a firearm.
	Well, they're going to change that.
	So when you look at the Biden administration, even when it comes to other countries, it tries to enact gun control.
	You have Israel wanting to buy a bunch of M16s from the United States.
	They were going to hand them out to civilians to let them protect themselves.
	Well, of course, this is anathema to Biden.
	Can you imagine?
	You know, we've already seen pictures, and people have already talked about that.
	They said, well, we're going to ease up the regulations so that allow people to defend themselves.
	And we saw pictures of citizen militias organizing to protect their neighborhoods and homes and things like that.
	And now, if you've got M-16s being sent from the U.S. and given to these people, I mean, it refutes everything that Biden is about.
	And so, as they requested to buy thousands of them, 24,000 as a matter of fact, the Biden administration says we will not approve the sale until Israel guarantees the critical weapons will not reach civilian outposts in the West Bank.
	And so you could say, well, this is because they don't want to consolidate Israel's presence in the occupied territories, but I think it's about something other than that.
	And by the way, I wonder how many M16s he left behind in Afghanistan.
	Probably more than 24,000, I would imagine.
	So I guess they'll have to buy them from the Afghans if they can.
	It's just amazing.
	And so now, the ATF director.
	You know, we had this big thing going back and forth.
	Remember that guy that was Chipman, David Chipman?
	We're talking about somebody who really looked like Biff from Back to the Future.
	That's Chipman. And he was this rabid gun control guy.
	Well, they got rid of him, and they put in this guy, Dettelbach, who appears to be a bit as bad, of course.
	And in a conference, listen, he went to Harvard University Conference and spoke, and he was interviewed by the Director of Undergraduate Studies in Women, Gender, and Sexuality.
	Who wants to know about guns?
	Because that's what this is all about.
	All of this women, gender, and sexuality studies is really about undermining our country in every possible way.
	And so she asked him about gun control.
	What's on your wish list?
	And he says, well, I want to put assault weapons back on my wish list.
	Because, you know, Biden was part of that, shutting that down in 2004.
	When he had his nomination hearings, he says, I'm not going to get rid of assault weapons.
	And of course, we know what that means when somebody definitely says that they're not going to do something in politics.
	That means they probably are going to do it.
	But before we run out of time, I want to take a quick look at what is happening today.
	Uh, with, um, uh, second, I'm sorry, with money.
	We just took a look at the second amendment, uh, with money.
	If I can get this thing to work, open up here.
	Okay. So we got, uh, in Australia and maybe Harps experienced this.
	Uh, you had, um, a giant internet provider, a telco giant Optus had a big outage on Thursday, November the 8th.
	And so it really put a kink in their banking system.
	And this is happening a week after we had supposedly something happening with the clearinghouse, the private clearinghouse here in the U.S. And it looked like it was happening on that Friday, a week before this happened.
	And I said, oh, we got it taken care of.
	But it still hung around until the next Monday.
	It was more obvious on Friday because you had people cause problems in people getting their paychecks.
	But this article from Epoch Times, the Optus blackout, proves that a small glitch in the system can cause total mayhem in a cashless society.
	That's right. If they get us into CBDC, this is the way you take us back to the dark ages, right?
	The only solution to this technocracy may be eventually going Amish.
	It is to protect our freedoms.
	It would be worth it. The mayhem, the frustration, the missed opportunities piled up in all quarters.
	Some businesses, like call centers for banks, breathe a sigh of relief given they couldn't field calls.
	However, for most people in small businesses, it's spelled disaster.
	The ever-so-convenient tap-and-go, where you use your phone, to make payments was removed, and it was done so without warning, and nobody had any cash.
	And guess what? The ATMs are down too, I guess.
	It's a timely reminder to us that carrying cash may be a sensible thing to do for occasions such as that experienced on November the 8th in Australia.
	These outages have happened in the past.
	They will happen again in the future.
	So it makes sense to use cash as retailers, and banks continue to charge for the use of cards and for the use of tap-and-go.
	And in this article, they say, you know, think about this.
	You know, they set up automatic teller machines.
	And at first, you know, there was no charge for that because they were saving money.
	They needed fewer people working in the banks in physical locations, so we could use an ATM instead.
	But then they start charging you for the ATM. And then they're doing the same thing for their tap-and-go stuff.
	They charge you a premium for that.
	And so what they're pointing out is that, you know, you can use cash and you can save those collection fees that they're going to charge you.
	Even if they don't add it to where you see it, you know that the retailer is paying it and they have to add that in.
	If they don't know what their costs are, they're going to go out of business.
	And so when you have extra fees that are added by the government, that gets padded into the cost.
	Always is that way.
	So yet once enough of us had been lured into ATMs rather than real live human tellers behind a counter in a local branch, banking staff was then cut, branches were closed, and then the fees started to be charged at the ATM. And this is where they do this everywhere.
	Fast forward to today and the surcharges for paying with a card have been quietly introduced.
	Meaning that the supposed savings for customers are now being ignored.
	You have all these labor-saving devices where they need fewer employees because, you know, you don't have to have somebody there making change for somebody at the register.
	They just tap and go. Oh, but now we're going to add fees to that as well.
	And guess what? Those fees will go up.
	They will go up.
	Those extra-gouged percentages can be avoided by paying cash.
	And not only that, but paying cash is going to keep that option alive.
	Surely the cost of a cashless transaction is far less than one that involves receiving money from the customer, giving change, balancing the till at the end of the day, taking the proceeds to the bank for depositing and all the rest of this stuff.
	Further, tap and go often makes the customer oblivious to what they're actually paying for because it's buried.
	So as all of this stuff goes down, And nobody can do any transactions.
	And you stop and think about how dangerous that is.
	When you look at Colonial Pipeline, for example, a year or two ago, and you had the biggest pipeline on the East Coast, the thing was shut down.
	How did they shut it down?
	Did they destroy the pipelines?
	No. Did they, using their control of their hack, did they shut down the valves and everything?
	No. What they did was they hacked the financial system so they couldn't process payments and that type of thing.
	And so they just stopped delivering stuff because they had no way to do transactions.
	And so if anybody wants to shut our society down, If you go completely electronic and completely cashless, everything is going to be shut down by somebody just attacking the financial system.
	And look at what we've seen in Australia and in the United States the week before in both of these cases.
	And so it is a real vulnerability that's there.
	Russia is saying the digital ruble will replace cash.
	And no doubts about it.
	The same guy who said back in September 2021, he said the digital ruble is going to be a replacement for cash ruble.
	And now, as of October 30th of this year, he came back and reinforced that.
	At first, people would say, well, no, that was taken out of context.
	He really didn't mean that. They tried to walk it back.
	But now he's come back and he's doubled down.
	He says, essentially, the digital ruble is the real currency.
	Of the 22nd century or any other century, which at the end of the day must replace cash.
	He said it's more convenient than cash and safety and convenience and all the rest of the stuff, but it is also very vulnerable.
	Look, Russia is no different from many of these other countries.
	Putin used to go to Davos every year.
	This is the global agenda.
	That's happening everywhere.
	The hail hydra stuff.
	Again, regardless of where the price of gold is going up or down, you need to protect yourself against CBDC. And Tony Arterman has set up davidknight.gold.
	You can go there and get gold and silver.
	And I want to thank some of the people who have sent that to me.
	Got into Wolfpack and just got...
	A kid's meal from one of them, which is really pretty cool.
	They signed up at that level, and it's got a coloring sheet in there.
	It's got a flashlight and a little tool that kids can play with.
	But it's a way to teach kids the value of money.
	But we also have to understand the value of having something in your hand that they can't trace, that they can't shut down, that's going to be there if the internet gets taken down, if the infrastructure gets down.
	You can still be able to buy food if it's still around.
	I mean, you need to provide in a number of different ways, but you need to be able to have We're good to go.
	They're admitting their own incompetence.
	That's right. My son says Biden wants Israel to kill Palestinians, but only through bombings and drone strikes.
	Can't have civilians protecting themselves, but they are.
	Yeah, we'll do the killing.
	Leave that to us. We're really good at that.
	As Obama said, we got drones and all the rest of the stuff.
	We're great at assassination and all the rest of this.
	And yeah, but again, this article of Brownstone says, has the U.S. lost its first world status?
	This is a guy who had a meal with a friend from high school who is now living in Poland.
	And he's a doctor there.
	And one of the things he's doing is talking about the health effects of social isolation, which is another one of the things that they did to people.
	But he says, as we got together, he said, we went to see a movie, which was obviously made for teenagers or people who want to be teenagers forever.
	But he said, then we went to get something to eat and we're talking about what the country is like.
	Because he's been gone for more than a decade.
	Can you imagine how much things have changed?
	And he says, yeah, we've really kind of lost our first rule status.
	He said, I told him everything is dirty.
	Nothing works. Everything is also more expensive.
	And oh, by the way, you don't have any privacy anymore.
	And this guy who is now a physician in Poland said, yeah, I'm seeing a lot of privacy.
	Retired American soldiers coming to Poland because they're concerned about what they see happening in the U.S. He said, And he said, you know, we grew up together in this area.
	He said, it seemed like the 90s, a stereotypical suburb, you know, like you'd see in the early Simpsons episodes or something.
	He said, it wasn't Mayberry, but it certainly wasn't like what we see now.
	He said, on the drive through that day, we saw stores that were just abandoned.
	Everything appeared to have acquired a thin layer of grime.
	I couldn't recall being there in the before times, or even on more recent trips home to visit family.
	There's also far more beggars than I'd ever recall seeing at any time in the past.
	Well, I tell you, when we look at this stuff, it really is like Biff became president.
	Their model for BIF was Trump.
	And it's like we're living in Back to the Future 2.
	And many people still can't figure out how we got there.
	So the Fed is terrified that Americans are starting to get used to high inflation.
	And they said if that gets baked into people's mindset, then everybody is going to change the way people start to operate.
	It's one of the reasons why they've lied to us so much about inflation being transitory.
	So they said, well, if that happens, You know what we're going to have to do?
	We're going to have to raise interest rates again.
	Because they're going to grind us into the dust in order to keep their precious dollar on top.
	And again, all of these countries, Russia's doing the same thing as well.
	China, meanwhile...
	It's taking a lot of delivery of U.S.-based gold last month.
	Why? Well, because it is underpriced in the U.S., and they know that, and they're taking advantage of the arbitrage there.
	Hey, you know, they've artificially depressed the price of gold in the U.S., and so we can take these dollars that we don't want anymore, and we can cash them in and get the gold and bring that home.
	Again, you know, that's a big part of why you want to go to davidknight.gold, Tony Aardman, but it's also the CBDC stuff.
	It's also the jeopardy and the risk that we have in this cashless electronic society.
	So, take some precautions in that area.
	Thank you for joining us.
	Have a good day.
	The Common Man music They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.

▲