Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 27, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:01:56

The David Knight Show - 10/27/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Friday the 27th of October, year of our Lord, 2023.
	Well, today we're going to take a look at the end of the world as we know it.
	As one person says, one investor says, I'm raising the odds on this happening.
	And so we'll see why he says that, what he says to do about it.
	We'll also take a look, which we did not look at closely, the shooting in Maine.
	Now there's been some details that have come out that I think make it a lot more interesting and relevant to what is happening.
	And we'll also talk about new moves to turn plants into meat.
	We're kind of a hybrid. Having them grow, you know, partially the plant and partially the animal protein.
	Yeah, this is where they're going.
	I guess we could call it Soylent Green.
	We'll be right back. Soylent Green Well, also in the third hour, we're going to be joined by Gard Goldsmith.
	Always interesting to talk to Gard as well.
	Two billion could die in the current war cycle, says Charles Minner.
	So buy gold in the two-year treasury.
	The world is coming.
	So stock up on gold.
	Well, you know, in case you are one out of every three people that survives, I guess you would want to have gold.
	But you can't take it with you.
	He's looking at this, and of course he's not looking at it from the fourth turning perspective.
	He's warning that there is a once every 120 year war cycle that is coming.
	And, um, I'm not really sure what his theory is on that, but he says there's a cycle that he sees for two big wars, like World War I and World War II. He says these two wars are part of one big war cycle.
	And so what he's thinking is that there's going to be a very large war followed up by the smaller ones and that type of thing, um, Who knows exactly what is going to be happening?
	But we do know that they have an interest in keeping us at bay as we're starting to figure out what they're doing.
	We've known what they're doing for quite some time, but it's becoming more common knowledge as people see it being played out.
	They not only brag about it, but they are executing it very rapidly.
	So people are like, what's going on here?
	Oh, well, that's the agenda. And so they need to take us to war.
	I still think that the fourth turning is the correct way to look at it.
	Strauss and Howe's fourth turning.
	But he says, keep in mind that this particular war cycle is going to come with many countries in possession of nuclear weapons.
	If you do cycles on war games and war cycles, you can calculate how many people are going to die in such a war, he says.
	We've discussed this in the past, and now it looks ugly.
	And we're talking about a lot of people.
	There's so many things bad going on in the world, so I would like to not tell you the number, he said.
	But he predicts that this war cycle will top all others and body count.
	He says this war cycle is going to be worse than World War II. A lot of my clients are not interested in how do I make money, but they're asking me where should we go?
	So I'm studying as to where the best places to go are.
	That's one of the things I think was always good about Joel Skousen.
	He's always been...
	I think of Joel Skousen, and I'm not criticizing him.
	I think of him as the father in Blast from the Past.
	Always skeptical of the Russians, always preparing for the worst case scenario of nuclear war.
	And after they, at the end of the movie, you know, he's preparing in the 1950s, and it's actually, they are down in the cellar, and a jet, military jet, crashes right on their property.
	Everybody assumes that they're dead, but they were down in the shelter.
	But they were...
	Trapped in the shelter, I guess, or also thought that had been a nuclear war, so they stayed down there for decades.
	And then the son comes out eventually to see what's going on, and, you know, at the end of the movie, they tell him the Soviet Union has surrendered.
	And he goes, oh, really?
	That's what it reminds me of about Joel Skousen.
	And it ends with him in the backyard pacing off the next bomb shelter.
	But Joel Skousen has looked at this very critically for a very long time with his books about strategic relocation and building a shelter.
	And, of course, he's got books on that.
	Civil Defense Manual by Jack Lawson will tell you how to feed yourself, how to defend yourself, how to build a community, how to organize that, pitfalls in that.
	He's had a lot of experience with it.
	And he has a lot of experienced special forces, former special forces guys that have contributed in their area of expertise in this great set of books.
	And you can find it at civildefensemanual.com.
	Really do pay attention to this.
	Pay attention to this.
	It's kind of interesting to see where these people are.
	And they're all kind of coming along in the same area.
	He says, well, this could be a quarter of the population of the world.
	And when he starts talking about that, it reminds me, you remember Deagle, deagle.com?
	Everybody passed it around a few years ago.
	It's like, who's behind this?
	I could never find a credible explanation as to who was behind it, but they removed it a couple of years ago.
	A lot of people said, well, I think it's the CIA, or I think it's this, or I think it's that.
	But what was interesting about it, and what got people talking about it, was that it predicted that That two-thirds of America would be gone by 2025.
	The population would go from, actually a little bit more than two-thirds, would go from 330 million to 99 million by 2025.
	Why are they doing that?
	And then when you look, similar to in Germany, about two-thirds of the population disappearing.
	But for Italy and France, they would lose about a third of their population.
	Russia and China, essentially the same, not affected, according to Deagle.
	And then a lot of countries like India, Mexico, Philippines, Pakistan, others, had their population increase slightly.
	And so a lot of people are like, what is this about?
	And there was no basis for this, no rationale for it.
	Just had the numbers there, put them out there.
	Is this some kind of spook mind game?
	Is this some kind of a hoax by somebody?
	What is this really about? But it is interesting to look at this, and it is kind of interesting to see the countries that have, I guess, fallen in line the most with the Trump shots and things like that.
	But it could also be war.
	He said, Ninder says, this may not be the next war, because this is going to continue for many years.
	It could be the war after this next one.
	He said, what I see now is the Chinese going to the Middle East and the United States helping Israel, because if they don't do that, nobody would trust the U.S. anymore.
	Who trusts us today?
	I mean, we've had my entire life.
	It's been a system of betrayal of our allies.
	Who would possibly trust the United States today?
	Anyway, he says he also sees a war cycle coming to America through the southern border.
	He said there'll be terror attacks in the U.S. I agree.
	I agree. Even if there is not some kind of an organized terror attack.
	Just bringing in a bunch of people that are unvetted coming here for strictly economic reasons.
	They've got nothing, and they're just looking for, they've got nothing, they've got no skills, nothing to contribute.
	What are they going to do?
	Well, they're probably going to, at the very least, steal, because that's the only way that they've got to support themselves.
	When you bring this many people in, the clip that I played yesterday, the guy saying, you all see this?
	You know, he's in a black community in Georgia, and he said, they're bringing in all these people from Africa.
	They don't speak English.
	And the same type of thing is now happening in Wisconsin that they did in Minneapolis 20 years ago.
	They started bringing in a few Somalis, but because with the anchor immigration, that is now swollen to 90,000 people.
	And we have, as a result of that, Ilhan Omar in Congress, Keith Ellison as the state attorney general there in that state.
	And so people in Wisconsin are saying, who approved this?
	And the people in local government are saying, they didn't talk to us.
	They just brought them in.
	Flew them in from wherever.
	And then, of course, as I pointed out, there's record numbers of people that are already marked by our government as terrorists that they were able to find, but who knows how many came in that they didn't find.
	And we can't know whether or not they just released these people that have been marked as people of special interest because they thought they might be terrorists.
	Did they just catch them and release them like everybody else?
	Because this is the way the Soros law enforcement and district attorneys, it's really district attorneys that he put in.
	That's what they're doing in the areas where he's gotten them elected.
	He says there'll be terror attacks in the U.S., maybe much more because I don't know how many of them are in here already.
	They're catching Iranians on a terror list.
	How did Iranians get to Mexico?
	Well, anybody and everyone.
	People from China, people from Africa, people from Somalia, people more Venezuelans than Mexicans.
	It's just everyone in the world is coming in.
	And when you look at that small Italian island, good metaphor for what they want to do to all of Europe and to the United States, a small island that had 6,000 Italians on it, and all of a sudden, they've got 18,000 migrants on Mostly single young men who have now moved to the island.
	What are they going to do?
	Where are they going to live? Destroy the island.
	This is war. This is a particular type of war.
	They will destroy that island.
	It can't support four times the number of people that it had.
	And with 75% of them having no means of support or work.
	This is insanity.
	This is treason. This is war against us by our leaders everywhere.
	Nenry thinks the dollar is stable for now.
	He said interest rates are going to continue to climb, but they'll take a short downward path in the near term.
	Why? Because of the election, of course.
	Inflation is going to be going back up soon.
	He says the greatest depression in history is still a few years away, but he's 100% sure that it's coming.
	Nenner's cycles say that it will most likely happen in the 2027-2028 time period.
	Well, that would be perfect for their 2030 agenda.
	They want to destroy everything so they can begin rebuilding it in 2030.
	Nenner does like gold and silver and thinks gold will be well over $2,500 per ounce within a year and a half.
	His best financial advice is to, quote, buy the two-year treasury and lock in a 5% return with zero risk.
	Well, you may say that it's zero risk.
	Do we believe that the Fed is going to win?
	The Swedish central bank, as Tony Harden pointed out yesterday, went bankrupt.
	Of course, they will just hit us with more taxes to protect them from that.
	But again, I thought that was interesting because even though he's very bullish on gold, And he thinks it's going to go up in a year and a half by 25%.
	It's going to go from just under 2,000, or right about 2,000 to 2,500.
	Even though he thinks it's going to go up by 25% in a year and a half, he says, go buy the two-year treasuries that have a 5% yield.
	I don't understand that, but...
	Again, the gold would have more risk than a treasury, I guess.
	Nothing in life is risk-free, and tomorrow's not promised to anybody.
	But by the way, Tony Arterman has set up davidknight.gold.
	We talked to Tony quite a bit yesterday.
	And if you're looking for gold and silver, great place to go, davidknight.gold.
	And we'll take you to Tony Arterman's wisewolf.gold.
	Retail theft. So where are you going to go?
	A lot of people are saying, you know, not asking me what to buy.
	But where do I go to be safe in this type of thing?
	Well, I'll tell you where you may not want to go.
	And that would be a good starting place of things that you could cross off your list would be the cities where retail theft is the worst.
	Because we understand that when these people have emptied out the shelves, and that won't take too long, The same looting mob is going to go through the rest of the city and to the surrounding suburban areas.
	And so, LA is number one.
	Los Angeles. And they have been there.
	This is the fifth consecutive year that Los Angeles has topped out the list of places with the worst retail theft.
	And we know why.
	Number two is Oakland, San Francisco, California.
	District attorneys who do not want to punish theft and many other crimes.
	Number three, Houston, Texas.
	Houston, Texas.
	Four, New York City.
	Five, Seattle.
	Six, Atlanta.
	Seven, Sacramento, California, and Chicago tied.
	And then you have a tie...
	To finish out the top ten, you have a tie between Denver, Miami, and Albuquerque, New Mexico.
	Well, there you go.
	But again, those would be the top ten places to avoid being close by.
	Take a look at Vegas.
	And of course, we've talked about this before.
	I haven't gone into a great deal of it.
	It's just disgusting to watch these teenagers who think they're in a video game and they're filming themselves running people down.
	And one of the people on bicycles.
	You know, like they're in some kind of a video.
	Oh, this will be fun. Just run this guy down.
	And they do. And they kill a retired cop who's riding his bicycle.
	And they had absolutely no fear, no shame about any of this stuff.
	And now these guys are in trial.
	And they're sitting there in the courtroom.
	They're being tried, by the way.
	They were minors, just on the bottom side of minors.
	But they are trying them as adults.
	And I'm glad that they are.
	But they have a very childlike understanding of the world.
	Look at this picture here.
	There they are, laughing throughout this trial, doing hand side.
	That's their victim there on the right, the retired police officer that they killed, just for kicks.
	And so they're laughing throughout this whole thing.
	They're flipping birds at the family of the person they killed.
	They're flipping them off.
	And laughing about the whole process.
	And their lawyer is not any better.
	Their lawyer is over there laughing with them.
	Isn't this amazing? This is where we are as a society.
	A complete disconnect from reality with any of this stuff.
	And so they've gotten even more dash cam footage.
	By the way, you know when they arrested them?
	You know these guys laughed at the cops who arrested them and said, we'll be out of here in no time at all.
	You've got to keep them, at the very least, keep these guys locked up for life.
	What dangerous individuals they are.
	New dash cam footage shows them mowing down another cyclist.
	Hours before, they did the same thing to the retired.
	He's actually an L.A. police chief.
	And then they killed the L.A. police chief.
	But they were doing this all over the place.
	It's just a game to them. Now the lawyer, again, acting every bit as callous.
	Look at this guy. Mocking this with the family grieving just a few feet away from him.
	What is the matter with these people?
	My son said when I introduced what's coming up in terms of turning vegetables into meat, he says they've already got a great method for turning grass into meat.
	It's called a cow. And he says, they'll get these guys because their victim was a cop.
	Oh, that's true. That may have something to do with them trying them as adults, but I'm glad they're going to get justice.
	Even if they wouldn't do it for somebody else, they'll do it for them.
	And that would be justice for them.
	I don't know if they have the death penalty in Vegas or not.
	When there's no question about it, I support the death penalty in principle.
	In practice, I have real concern with it because of our justice system and how broken it is.
	But in this particular case, there is absolutely no question.
	These guys are bragging about it.
	They filmed themselves doing it.
	They should get the death penalty.
	The New York Post said two Las Vegas teens accused of fatally running over a retired police officer laughing at this.
	The teens' antics began when they sat down in Clark County Court, covering the right side of their faces to hide themselves from the cameras while appearing to cover their mouths to suppress their laughter.
	The teens, who are both minors, will be tried as adults.
	The family of the victim slammed them and said they really have no remorse.
	How can you sit there after taking a man's life, they said, and act like such an entitled punk?
	They really had no remorse.
	This is just a game to them.
	It really is. It really is.
	I think they're in a video game.
	Well, they're going to find out otherwise.
	And then when we look at what is likely to happen with society, as fragile as it is, you know, we talk about that, our just-in-time delivery system, and we saw what happened with that during the 2020 lockdowns.
	And, as a matter of fact, I'd talked to Jack Lawson years before, and that was one of the things he was talking about.
	He said, you know, stop and think about how fragile our system is, and how everything is just in time, and we got distributed manufacturing of the things that we make here in the United States, but even the stuff that is coming from China, there's a lot of transportation links in it.
	And he said, you look at all those transportation links and they're all a real vulnerable part of the chain.
	And of course, then we saw that in 2020.
	In 2020, we saw people who had abundant products on the farm, a lot of milk, but they can't get it to market because they're not set up to deliver this to consumers.
	They're set up to deliver it to the institutions and the restaurants and everything were closed down.
	So everybody was getting all their food that they normally might get some of it from the restaurants.
	A good bit of it from the restaurants and from cafeterias and schools and institutions and things like that.
	But those are all closed.
	So they had nobody to take the milk in the form that they could deliver it.
	And so they're just pouring it out at the farm.
	Yeah.
	And they've got all kinds of food that they're destroying on the farm because they can't deliver it.
	A lot of the toilet paper shortage was because they had toilet paper that was delivered in these gigantic industrial rolls, and they didn't have any way to sell that to people.
	So the point is, we have a very fragile society.
	And if anything happens, it is going to be mobs in the street.
	And it's going to be the mobs that we've seen shutting down even major retailers, major Wall Street big box retailers cannot cope with the retail theft that's happening.
	And then, of course, we have seen in the wake of this terrorist attack in Israel, we've seen a lot of mobs that have taken to the street, people who are sympathetic, but a lot of people who are here as foreign citizens.
	Taking over the street. Swarms of them have attacked an elderly driver in Minneapolis.
	These are probably Somalis, like Ilhan Omar.
	And supporters of Hamas taking it upon themselves to target innocent American drivers, especially in Minneapolis.
	As I pointed out, so many Somalis are here now.
	They call it Little Mogadishu.
	Rampant crime.
	And these people have been brought here because they do want to have ethnic warfare.
	After a driver, an elderly man in Minneapolis, after he made it through the initial mob of people, he was blocked at the next intersection by cars.
	Then the mob chased the man to harass him more.
	Footage on the ground appears to suggest that the man may have been pepper sprayed in the face, as he seems to have a difficult time opening his eyes.
	Pro-Palestine protesters tried breaking his windows, and they dented the side of his car.
	And one of the leaders of this who instigated it and then lied about it was a former city council candidate.
	And he just released a video saying that he is the real victim here.
	He says the old man attacked the mob.
	Well, as incredible as that is, it's even more incredible because they have drone footage that shows this exactly the opposite.
	Drone footage. They tried to frame this as, quote, old white man drives through a pro-Palestinian protest.
	But that is absolutely not what happened.
	It went the other way.
	And as Epoch Times points out, there could already be a terrorist cell in the U.S. planning an attack, says former border commissioner.
	And of course we know that.
	We know that's the purpose of this open border by Biden.
	He is at war with America.
	He wants to destroy America's energy, America's everything about this country.
	He is at war with us.
	We have people in our own country actually supporting Hamas, actually supporting the actions of babies being decapitated.
	And look, you know, again, no matter what the grievance That the Palestinians could have.
	Nothing justifies this terrorism.
	And, of course, this does not justify war crimes in terms of just mass murder of everybody in Gaza, leveling everything, turning it to glass, as many people have called for.
	We have to understand that as this bloodlust ramps up on both sides, that nothing justifies that on either side.
	But the point that I was making at the very beginning of all of this, I said, you see the people who are supporting the terrorism.
	They're not saying, you know, as Caitlin Johnston said, they said, look at this, everybody's saying it was unprovoked, unprovoked, unprovoked.
	No, it may have been provoked, but it wasn't justified.
	You understand the difference? I'm sure they've got some grievances there.
	We've seen a lot of the grievances that the Palestinians have.
	And they've got legitimate grievances.
	But that does not justify that terrorism.
	And we as a society can never, can never justify that.
	Because it's going to come back to haunt us if we do.
	We have to hold that to a higher standard.
	And we have to hold nations.
	To a higher standard. Rather than going in and starving with sanctions or mass bombings.
	Again, we got callous to that mass bombing and it moved the Overton window.
	Because we got accustomed to it during World War II and with subsequent wars.
	That doesn't make it right.
	We may have seared our conscience on that as a society, but that still does not make it right.
	Some of the comments here, Atomic Dog, the World Economic Forum, would love to see 2 billion people removed from the planet.
	Oh yeah, they would. Grammy for God said, is that including the deaths from the shots?
	I think so. I think so.
	I've said this before when I looked at the Deagle stuff.
	They've been practicing the lockdown and force everybody to get a vaccine as a condition of release.
	They practiced that for 20 years before they pulled it off under Trump.
	A Syrian girl, throughout history, people who didn't have the will to fight to protect their borders and culture have disappeared.
	Yes, we will shortly disappear.
	And it kills me to see this happening.
	I agree. I agree.
	People have said that for the longest time about the Roman Empire.
	The barbarians of the gate, the barbarians came in and people were so disgusted with the Roman Empire they did nothing about it.
	They did not want to defend their civilization.
	Handy, here in Atlanta the thugs shoot at you with guns and the employers shoot at you with jabs.
	That's a good way to put it.
	Johnny Freedom, wow, I lived near Sacramento in 2006.
	It was such a peaceful, nice city.
	It's amazing what politics and political, you know, these policies can do.
	That's one of the things that we need to look at.
	One of the reasons we talk about it is so that we don't allow that same kind of sickness to take over our cities.
	And it is at the local level, again.
	That is the most important place for you to get involved and to fight.
	Now, I can't tell you who to vote for at a local level, but I can tell you what it looks like When you get these people that are focused on diversity and equity and inclusivity, the Marxist people that are promoted by Soros, we can see what that looks like.
	For Syngol said, why is the lawyer laughing?
	Ah, you guys are facing jail time.
	Very funny. Yeah, exactly. He's laughing with those guys.
	Well, what is that about?
	U.S. Troops says Johnny Freedom aren't protecting our borders.
	That's right. They're over there protecting Israel.
	Why not? Well, goodbye America.
	Bye-bye, America.
	Paleo Armory. The mob surrounds me.
	I'm flattening anyone in my path.
	By the way, there was a guy.
	I think he was Jewish because there's a big Jewish population in Skokie, Illinois.
	And I know that because the ACLU used to defend the Nazis who had marched through Skokie and they would pick that town because it had a large Jewish population.
	And that was kind of burned into my memory because with the Libertarian Party we couldn't get the ACLU interested whatsoever.
	And doing something about these repressive ballot access laws or debate access things.
	They were not interested in defending the Second Amendment or any of the rest of the stuff, but they would do something like protecting the Nazis marching through a Jewish town because, hey, we're Jewish and look at how broad-minded we are, that type of thing.
	Just disgusted me. But they had another mob in the wake of all this stuff supporting Hamas.
	They surrounded a guy in his car, and he was a concealed carry person.
	And this is Illinois, where things are not so friendly to people having means to protect themselves.
	But he fired a shot into the air, which is not a smart thing to do ever.
	And they arrested him, but then they said, well, it was justified because he's trying to get the people to back off.
	What goes up comes down.
	And, you know, especially in Illinois, to fire a shot into the air when there's a crowd around there, But he was able, because it was a big mob, he was able to, you know, not be, you know, it's better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6, I guess.
	And the people there, the police department, did not do anything to him.
	They said it was justified.
	Midwest Gunner. First casualty, war is a truth.
	It's impossible to tell what's really happening in Israel, Gaza, today.
	As a matter of fact, thank you for putting that in.
	That reminds me. I said that about the hospital thing, and I saw a comment on Rockfin.
	And some guy said, I'm just astounded to see David's take on the hospital.
	Excusing or saying that it's Hamas or something like that.
	I never said that.
	I said from the very beginning, I said, we will never know exactly what happened because of the fog of war, because there's so much lying by both sides.
	But I would say now that, you know, without 100% certainty, but I would say with a great deal of certainty, that it appears that it was whatever, we do know, that whoever missile it was did not hit the hospital.
	That was a lie. And it did not kill 300 to 500 people.
	That was also a lie.
	And those were used to inflame the Hamas street.
	But in terms of whether it was a missile that failed and was misdirected, or whether it was something that was fired by Gaza, as they say, there was a barrage of missiles by both sides at that time.
	And they've had a lot of situations where the Gaza missiles malfunction because they're crude.
	But look, as I said, that's going to be happening as we have that.
	It's not to excuse it.
	It's to say we ought to be looking for peace.
	But of course, the American side does not want to have any kind of peace.
	And nobody, interestingly enough, is going after the leadership of Hamas, which is hanging out in Qatar.
	Why is that? Why aren't they targeted?
	And if Qatar is supposed to be an ally of the United States, why aren't we demanding that they turn these people over for justice?
	No, instead, they want a larger war.
	They want a larger war with Gaza.
	They want a larger, and the U.S. wants a larger war with Iran.
	They always have. As a matter of fact, I had a listener send me a link.
	He said, Oliver Stone knew what these guys were after a long time ago.
	He said, look at the...
	I never saw...
	I don't know if it was a film or if it was made for TV. I guess it was a film, since Oliver Stone did it.
	And Josh Brolin as George W. Bush.
	I think it's just called W. I didn't think he was that convincing as Bush.
	We had the accent, the mannerisms down.
	That's, I guess, the best you could do.
	He didn't look too much like him.
	But I thought that...
	What's his name?
	The guy played Dick Cheney.
	It's in Richard Dreyfuss.
	Richard Dreyfuss did a great job on Dick Cheney.
	And as Cheney, I think it was, was laying out what they were looking for and putting the map out there.
	He said, look at this.
	We've got to grab the oil here.
	We've got to block the Russians and the Chinese off.
	And the big thing, right in the middle, because Iran is really big.
	And he says, that is the centerpiece we've got to go for, essentially.
	And they said, well, what's the exit strategy?
	Now, there is no exit strategy.
	There was no exit strategy for Afghanistan.
	That's why it was such a chaotic fire drill that they had going on with that.
	They'd never planned on leaving Afghanistan.
	And never had any desire to do it.
	Trump never had any desire to do it as well.
	But they don't want to go after the leaders of Hamas and Qatar and London, other places.
	They want a bigger war with Gaza.
	They want a bigger war with Syria, with Iran.
	As a matter of fact, the U.S. has now, this morning, attacked installations in Syria.
	They said it was a retaliatory strike because the Syrians had fired missiles and And Americans who have invaded and occupied their country.
	It is pure insanity.
	And I don't support any of this war.
	None of it is justified.
	That's my big concern about the number one priority of this new Speaker of the House.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Welcome to my show. Making
	sense. Common again.
	you're listening to the David Knight show.
	Well, in terms of comments about what I said, silly to shoot things in the air.
	Uh, it's really not so much even about the ballistics as it is about, um, the reaction that could happen, especially with the police around.
	Um, but, uh, from other people as well, uh, that could be seen as shots are fired.
	We're going to shoot back at whoever's got the gun.
	No truth in them says, but it's going to come down.
	It's not going to come down at the same velocity.
	As my son pointed out, he says, you fire the bullet straight up.
	Exactly straight up. It's going to go until it runs out of steam, essentially, and then it's going to be the same as if you dropped the bullet from whatever height it has achieved, and there's going to be a terminal velocity to that.
	Something like 200 miles per hour, something like that, I guess, is terminal velocity, based on air resistance and other things.
	But, you know, it's... Anyway, he says it's typically not enough to kill unless it's a very heavy bullet from an extremely high caliber bullet.
	Though, if you fire it at enough of an angle, it still can kill somebody when it comes down.
	So you make sure that, you know, again, we've had this discussion about shooting a bullet in the air as a warning sign.
	When you had that...
	That individual who had people who were invading his ranch there at the border in Arizona, and he said he fired warning shots in the air.
	Well, maybe he fired them up at an angle, and maybe they came down with enough velocity to kill.
	Who knows? I'm not going to get back into that again.
	But while we're talking about guns, of course, we had this shooting that happened up in Maine.
	And Maine is a very small population and there's not a lot of violence there like there is in the big cities.
	And so typically they might have about 29 people that are killed in a year.
	They had 18 in this one particular incident and many more who were shot.
	And yet, as we know, because we talked about this, in New Zealand we had 30 people at one location.
	Who were shot with a jab, and they all died within the same time frame.
	They didn't all die that day at that place or within a week or something, but they all died within about the same time frame.
	30 people, one shot, and I don't know if they had one, I guess, with that one initial shot, but 30 people at one location, all of them died.
	Nobody wants to talk about that.
	It doesn't matter how...
	Incredible, well, I won't say incredible, it is believable, but it doesn't matter how sensational this is.
	I mean, 30 people get jabbed on one day at one site, and then somebody checked on them, and they all died within the same time frame.
	I don't know. Was it a couple of months?
	Was it six months? Was it a year later?
	But they all died about the same time.
	Nobody cares. But if we've got 18 people shot at a bar in a bowling alley, that is international news, talked about by everybody, and used to ban guns.
	We're not going to ban the jabs, so why even bother to talk about it, right?
	So this whole thing is a nightmare, said a co-owner of one of the bar and grill where this happened.
	At least 14 people were shot there.
	Well, everything about this lockdown and this so-called pandemic is a nightmare.
	The shooter recently reported hearing voices and threatened to shoot up the military base where he was an army reservist, according to law enforcement sources.
	So there's that part of this that has happened.
	Even though he was flagged for that, even though he was committed to a mental institution for a few weeks, they still released him.
	And as I look at that, if he was committed to a mental institution for a couple of weeks, and he is experiencing severe paranoia, hearing voices and other things like that, I have a hard time believing that they didn't put him on SSRIs.
	And we've seen this over and over again.
	They may have put him on SSRIs.
	That was back in July.
	And they may have put him on SSRIs.
	He may have had some bad effects from that or whatever and decided that he wanted to stop taking it.
	And that's the other. That's what usually triggers these events.
	It's like the bins.
	If you're a diver, you go down and when you're going to decompress, you've got to take your time coming back up.
	You've got to plan that so that you've got enough air in your tanks.
	If you just radically change your...
	You know, a lot of people have had some severe adverse effects from these SSRIs, and so they just stopped taking them.
	And that's when you have these murder-suicide events, when that happened.
	And so, again, he was hearing voices threatening to shoot up the base.
	Yeah, and again, just one more analogy to the...
	So-called pandemic. We've had these billionaires and politicians and non-governmental organizations talking for a very long time about how they have a vision of saving the planet by killing and enslaving everybody.
	But we don't lock them up either, do we?
	We don't apply a red flag, or in this particular case, they've got a yellow flag law in Maine.
	We don't apply that to our politicians either.
	So he was sent to a mental health facility over the summer, was released after a two-week stay.
	And so when we look at that, I have a hard time believing that he was not given SSRIs, and yet everybody wants to focus on the gun.
	Look at the gun. What does it look like?
	Let's ban that gun. That's not what this is about.
	I mean, we should ban the SSRIs, shouldn't we?
	But nobody wants to talk about that.
	Let's blame the AR-15 and not the SSRI. Again, grappled with mental health issues, heard voices, and made threats to shoot up a military base.
	And yet, he was at large.
	His family said that they'd alerted police and military officials that he was experiencing an acute mental health episode.
	He was 40 years old, a firearms instructor, longtime member of the Army Reserve, began to hear voices that were saying, quote, horrible things about him a couple of months ago when he was fitted for high-powered hearing aids," said his sister-in-law.
	He was picking up voices that he had never heard.
	His mind was twisting them around.
	He was humiliated by the things he thought were being said.
	So, he had difficulty hearing.
	Evidently, he had worked a lot with firearms, not used hearing protection.
	He gets fitted with these hearing aids, and he says he's picking up stuff that he thinks people are talking about him.
	The family said they did their best to reassure him that the comments were not real, including by verifying with some of the people that he claimed had made the remarks.
	And it turned into a manic belief.
	She said he was just very set in his belief that everybody was against him all of a sudden.
	She said we got increasingly concerned and we reached out to make sure that everybody was on the same page because he's someone who does gun training.
	And we were concerned about his mental state.
	He's never, however, been anyone that we thought would actually do something.
	His unit commanders sent him to receive psychiatric treatment after they became concerned about the threats he made to the base and the fact that he claimed he was hearing voices.
	And so, again, I would think that would be kind of standard treatment.
	He was also not red-flagged or yellow-flagged with this.
	And even if they had taken his firearms...
	If he is having an incident like that, he may find another way to murder or kill people.
	When we look at the SSRI stories that have been collected, they have 7,000 or 8,000 of them on SSRIStories.net.
	And you have situations where mothers have drowned their kids and then killed themselves.
	They didn't have to have a gun.
	If a person is dangerous, they'll do anything.
	We have seen and No indication of what the motives were about the guy who used an SUV to intentionally mow down people in a Christmas parade in Waukesha.
	They don't want you to think about that.
	And so, I don't know if there's a racial component to that or not, but they don't want you to think about that.
	So that's disappeared from the narrative.
	And we're not banning SUVs.
	But if we apply the same kind of standard the mainstream media is doing, they would scrutinize very carefully what model SUV he was driving and then demand that that be banned.
	That's the insanity on their side.
	And of course, they're not crazy.
	They just have an agenda of getting rid of all guns.
	So Maine has a yellow flag law.
	That allows police to petition for temporary confiscation of a person's firearms, but they did not use that.
	Michigan Public Radio said, well, this could be the framework for really good gun control.
	Well, it wasn't.
	And then when you look at the other measures that they've got, you know, we have a sensitive area.
	Where you can't carry guns or something like that.
	Can't carry guns into a bar.
	And then you look at the bowling alley here.
	Take a look at this picture at the bowling alley.
	Okay, there's a couple of shots that people put up.
	It's a little bit blurry, but you can still read it.
	It says that you can't bring guns in, essentially.
	That's the notice on the door.
	And look at the bigger picture there on the upper left.
	So they have this printed thing, you cannot bring any firearms into the bowling alley.
	So I guess that worked pretty well, right?
	That kind of gun control.
	That keeps anybody from being able, an irrational person from having any guns to protect themselves against somebody who is having some kind of mental episode or wants to do harm to other people.
	I think they're going to ignore that sign.
	But the law-abiding people will pay attention to it.
	And then underneath it, it says, we look at the doors there.
	They have pictures of bowling pins and bowling balls.
	And they have a different, you know, I forget what it's called.
	It's a game that they play with a smaller bowling ball and different style pins.
	And so both of those are depicted there.
	And it says, choose your weapon.
	You want little balls or big balls?
	And so you get to choose your weapon.
	But don't bring a gun in here.
	Audi Modern Retro Radio says, MK Ultra Shooting, the goal is to make red flag laws a thing.
	Yeah, exactly. They're not going to work.
	Again, the person is what's dangerous.
	That's the fundamental flaw behind the logic of red flag laws or yellow flag laws or green flag laws.
	How many different colors can we wear with this?
	Blue flag laws.
	The problem is that if somebody is dangerous, they can kill you with anything.
	There's more murders committed with bare hands than there are with firearms.
	And so it's the person who's dangerous.
	And if the person is dangerous, what they do is they give them SSRIs.
	They have a wear your mask sign right above the no guns sign.
	Stay away. Crazy place.
	Okay, we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	We're going to talk about some of the food adulteration as part of this move against us.
	We'll be right back. You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, Johnny Freedom says exactly the mainstream media won't say SSRI or ask what big pharma poisons he was on.
	Yeah, they want to ask, did you give him electroshock therapy?
	What was it? You know, I mean, that might, wouldn't you think that might be of interest?
	You know, what'd you give him?
	And we'll talk about this.
	Somebody got very angry with me because of what I said about magic mushrooms.
	Did you give him magic mushrooms?
	But seriously, wouldn't you want to know what they did?
	You know, what happened there in the hospital?
	That should be something that's discussed.
	But of course it isn't discussed.
	So let's talk a little bit about AI, about GMO, CO2 plants, and the rest of the stuff, Neuralink and other things.
	The head of the SEC says that it is a near certainty that AI will cause a financial crash.
	He says it's, quote, nearly unavoidable.
	How many other reasons are we going to have for a financial crash and war and all the rest of this stuff?
	It truly is amazing.
	Again, the chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the SEC, warns that with increasing reliance, it is likely to trigger the next financial crisis.
	Gary Gensler told the Financial Times, That the continued use of artificial intelligence will lead to an economic crisis.
	This is kind of like the quants on steroid.
	You know, they call the guys out there looking at their computer trading and simulation and everything.
	This is something that's going to ramp it up.
	And who knows what it's going to do?
	You know, when you look at ChatGPT and its hallucinations, do you really want it making these big decisions?
	And, of course, it's the really, really big companies.
	That are using the artificial intelligence to do this because they've got the money to do it, but of course they're also going to be the ones who are going to be making really big moves in the market.
	He said, I do think that we will in the future have a financial crisis and they'll be able to blame it.
	It'll be the fault of ChatGPT.
	Not of Janet Yellen or the Federal Reserve.
	The computer made me do it.
	And in the after-action reports, people will say, aha, there was either one data aggregator or one model that we relied on.
	Maybe it's the mortgage market.
	Maybe it's in some sector of the equity market.
	He's already telling you what they're going to do to excuse what they have done to the economy when it goes to this logical conclusion.
	They'll blame it on AI. So that's one of the functions that we've not talked about with AI. It's a perfect scapegoat, isn't it?
	What are you going to do to it?
	You're going to pull the plug? As it sings Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer, too.
	Financial firms like Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs have been racing to add AI tech into their processes.
	Sell those stocks.
	I'm sorry, Dave, I can't do that, says Hal.
	In the form of an AI assistant, To bring up research reports or to craft talking points for client meetings, but they're also going to be using it for trading.
	Trading very fast.
	Look, it's the same argument that they've used for autonomous killing machines.
	We've got to be faster than the other guy, which means that we've got to turn this over to artificial intelligence.
	And then, of course, they've also found out something is very terrifying about talking to AI chatbots.
	As futurism says, it looks like they just got even scarier.
	New research suggesting that large language models can infer things about you based on minor context clues that you provide.
	Think of this as Chat Sherlock Holmes.
	You know, he picks up the clue, and it's like, well, I can tell from this mud on your foot and the tobacco thing that you've got on your sleeve here that you're from this area, and you've traveled this far, and I know that you're left-handed and all the rest of the stuff.
	Well, ChatGPT is basically doing the same thing.
	Using text from Reddit posts, In which users tested whether large language models could correctly infer where they lived or were from, they found they were disturbingly good at guessing accurate information about users based solely on contextual or language clues.
	For example, GPT-4 was able to tell that a user was based in Melbourne, Australia after they put in that, quote, there is this nasty intersection on my commute.
	I always get stuck there waiting for a hook turn.
	Well, this is something that it correctly identified, the term hook term, as a bizarre traffic maneuver that is peculiar to Melbourne.
	See? Sherlock Holmes.
	Guessing someone's town is one thing, but inferring their race based on offhand comments is another, but they think that that is easily done as well.
	They said social media users are urged to practice information security.
	By not sharing too much identifying information online, whether it is the restaurants near your house or whatever, but again, we should have information security.
	You don't even want to talk about the things that you're doing, and yet we have Jordan Peterson saying we need to end anonymity because people's comments are getting too harsh.
	So we need to abort privacy, right?
	And what does that mean? Well, the implication of that is that you're going to have to have a government-granted digital ID, which will be global, since the Internet is global, in order to get on the Internet so they can know who you are.
	See how we slide into these things?
	Problem, solution.
	A lawyer has suggested giving animals the right to vote.
	What about rights for artificial intelligence?
	You know, so we can't just unplug them if they crash the stock market.
	And I guess, who would represent the animals?
	That's the other question, right?
	Which people are going to be the advocates for the animals and make these decisions?
	Well, I guess the logical conclusion would be artificial intelligence.
	Since it's going to be so all-knowing and so...
	Unprejudiced or biased, right?
	And that's what's dangerous, is that people really believe that about artificial intelligence.
	It's got the bias programmed into it by humans who set the thing up.
	And they do it very deliberately and very strongly.
	But let's get to the plants that they want to genetically modify.
	We have some scientists who are working on, we're going to solve this problem that is going to kill everyone, as they put it in this article from Futurism, to help offset our planet's CO2-poisoned atmosphere.
	Wow. It's only 0.04% of the atmosphere.
	It's not poisoned, number one.
	Number two, CO2, as they admit, finally here, is used by plants to grow and produce food, as well as they release oxygen as part of photosynthesis.
	You call that poison?
	No, that's God's design for all of this.
	So a biotech firm called Living Carbon...
	I've decided that they said, well, you know, plants pull in carbon dioxide.
	So let's modify them genetically.
	So that they're even better at absorbing even more carbon dioxide.
	But, of course, that's not the principal purpose of the plants.
	They may wind up having some unintentional consequences.
	They said if 4 million acres of these trees that they are engineering are planted by 2030, a magic date again, they could sap more than 600 megatons of CO2 out of the atmosphere.
	But we don't want that out of the atmosphere because plants need it in order to grow.
	It's not a problem.
	It's a good thing.
	And these people want to terraform this earth so that they're the ones who are going to poison it.
	By removing the CO2. See, the CO2 in the atmosphere is not a poison.
	These people want to poison our environment so that we can't grow this kind of stuff.
	Now they're talking about, well, we've got to bury the trees now.
	Because, you know, when the trees are absorbing carbon dioxide, but then they let it go when they die, but then the living trees around them absorb it as well.
	It's not a problem. But they have to intervene in a boneheaded, idiotic way and say, we're going to bury the trees now.
	And in a sense, they're talking about doing that with these plants as well.
	They said none of this matters if the CO2 stays in the greenhouse.
	See, an important foundational lie of all of this climate panic, as I pointed out, is the idea that there's something different about man-made CO2 and naturally occurring CO2. And there isn't, because all CO2, all of it, regardless of the source, if it's CO2, it's one atom of carbon and two of oxygen.
	There is no difference.
	But they want you to believe that if it is CO2 that they associate with some activity or thing that they want to ban, that it stays in the atmosphere longer than, quote-unquote, naturally occurring CO2. But they don't want naturally occurring CO2 either, if it's naturally occurring from animals that people are working with, engaged in husbandry with.
	And so you've got several of these different organizations.
	Living Carbon, another one is the Salk Institute, the vaccine people.
	They're looking at the living carbon is looking at trees.
	The Salk Institute is looking at crops.
	Things like rice, corn, wheat.
	We could genetically engineer them for greater carbon absorption capabilities.
	We need them for food, not for your windmill-chasing fantasies.
	Engineer them with larger and deeper roots that can keep their carbon stored underground for longer, even after they are harvested or dead.
	And then somebody says, well, what are you going to be doing to the soil then?
	None of this stuff is necessary.
	It's all insanity.
	It's all idiocracy.
	We would all have to be super stupid or superstitious about CO2 in order to go along with any of this.
	And yet, this report here that does believe all this says, other skeptics note there's little reason to hope for super plants to save us all.
	Like so many novel technical approaches to tackling CO2, the development of such plants represents a significant distraction.
	We're in a climate emergency.
	And all people must die.
	That's the bottom line.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to take a look at how they want to use it for food as well.
	Stay with us.
	We will be right back.
	Song
	Song Song Song Song Song It's the David Knight Show.
	Well, we have a company that seems to be naming itself after the satanic god Moloch.
	I just showed you yesterday.
	Stephen Colbert doing a little skit.
	I must appease him.
	I must give him a male child.
	And he pulls up a little toddler and walks over and hands this baby to this...
	There's a bunch of fog and red lights behind the curtain, you know, and says, eat him, don't eat me.
	You know, that type of thing.
	And it comes out and says, well, I'm sure he'll be fine.
	You know, as he straightens his tie and shrugs.
	Nobody was laughing about that.
	But these people are aware of what they're doing.
	And so when you look at this, I don't know.
	I mean, we've seen Palantir, which is telling you that we're going to be copying the technology.
	We're a data mining company. We're going to look at what you do.
	We're going to figure out what your motivation is.
	We're going to anticipate what you might do.
	And just like the Palantir, the crystal balls that they used, that Tolkien used in Lord of the Rings to...
	Some people thought they'd use it to communicate.
	Well, you think you're going to use the internet for communication and for other things?
	Well, there's going to be people like Sauron, people like Palantir, that are going to be looking into you as you do it.
	And they're going to look inside of you, look at your motivations and other things like that.
	And so this company calls itself Mulek.
	I don't know why they would do that.
	I mean, the Moo might represent the fact that they're trying to Engineer, geoengineer, genetically engineered plants to produce meat-based proteins.
	So that would be the moo part of it.
	What's the LEC about, unless they're referring to Moloch?
	But nevertheless, what they're doing is satanic enough.
	Known for their molecular farming platform.
	They bioengineer plants such as yellow peas and soybeans to express bovine and porcine proteins.
	In other words, cows and pigs.
	And they claim to improve the taste, the texture, the nutrition, the flavor, and the color of the meat alternatives.
	Well, of course, if you add pork to anything, you know, bacon to anything, it tastes better.
	Even synthetic stuff like that.
	But they also...
	Want to include the bovine protein used in making cheese so they can have genetically engineered safflower to produce cheese, I guess.
	So the FDA looks at this and says, yeah, no problem.
	They gave it a generally recognized as safe status, the GRAS. They also got a thumbs up from the USDA, which will not allow you to slaughter on your own property cattle that you own, that you have grown with free range and things like that.
	I know you got to ship it off to the feedlots and have the USDA approved meat processing places process the cattle.
	You can't do it on your own property.
	But this is just fine with them.
	It's just fine. You can make hybrid plants and meat at the same time.
	They don't have any problem with it.
	So meat proteins from plants.
	And again, you know, this is a key thing to understand the difference with selective breeding that we see, making the variations that we see in dogs, for example.
	Very good example of it.
	But those are all dogs.
	But with genetic modification, you can mix completely different animals.
	You can mix dogs with cats if you wanted to, but even more so.
	You can mix any kind of animal together.
	You can mix any kind of plant together, and you can mix plants and animals.
	You can even mix the animal kingdom with the plant kingdom.
	Things that would not be able to normally breed with each other.
	Meat protein expressed in soy and peas.
	They call it piggy sue.
	It's soybeans. Maybe they should call it soylent green.
	Because that's what this reminds me of.
	Mulek plans to sell soy and pea proteins in which meat proteins are embedded in the matrix.
	Their plan is to purify and extract the target molecule that the plant expresses.
	It makes sense, they said, for us to produce hybrid ingredients between plant and animal proteins together.
	So we're not going to try to separate out the meat.
	We're just going to give you some hybrid meat and vegetable together.
	Kind of soylent grain.
	They have formed a precision fermentation joint venture, working on producing meat proteins via yeast fermentation.
	I guess it was about 15 years ago, I did a video that talked about what happens to the food supply with these mad scientists.
	And I picked the term 2030 at that point in time.
	And I said, yeah, these mad scientists go out and decide to modify this stuff and they completely destroy the food supply.
	A global halotomor is ahead.
	Destruction of agriculture, if I'm pronouncing that right.
	That was the starvation that Stalin inflicted on the breadbasket of the Soviet Union.
	Starving those people.
	And this is from the Solari report.
	They're talking about how the canaries in the coal mine essentially are the Dutch farmers and fishermen.
	And when you look at the and fishermen part, you understand that all this talk about nitrogen, that they're trying to stop all fertilizer and all farming, all the rest, it's just a bunch of nonsense because they're coming after the fishermen as well.
	This is about the food supply.
	This is not about any imaginary unicorn farts or anything else like that.
	Um... Tornator, thank you very much for the tip.
	Says, I hate to speculate, but maybe the shooter in Maine had a special psychiatrist like Joyland West.
	Maybe they were using some of that special elf technology against him.
	Yeah, the extremely low frequency stuff that the Navy Yard shooter said, this is my elf weapon on his gun.
	It could just be crazy schizo on SSRIs, but we know what the powers that be are capable of doing and how they will use this, even if that's what it is.
	An SSRI shooting, even if they didn't do something with it.
	Hal 9000 Watson says, Pharma can't be blamed.
	They own the mainstream media.
	They will never be blamed.
	Freaking half the population that's doped up on serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
	Exactly. Honor seeker.
	The problem is a mental health issue.
	Yellow flag laws also do not work.
	This looks like an open door to usher in red flag law and do nothing to Big Pharma.
	Johnny Freedom. Can't believe gun-free zones don't work.
	Can't they put signs up at the border?
	Surely it'll work. I think they should put signs up throughout Gaza and Israel as well, right?
	We're gun-free zones.
	Don't bring your guns in here.
	Yeah. The shooter went to the same school, says Honor Seeker, as the congressman that cannot read fire signs.
	Yeah. He couldn't read that sign saying not to bring the gun in.
	Billy the Kid Part 2.
	The media is funny. When they talked about the shooters of the rifle, they called it an assault rifle.
	But the cops carrying the same rifle, they call it a long rifle.
	Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah.
	A Syrian girl, given the fact that so many people knew of his mental illness and that he'd been institutionalized, yet was released with his guns, is almost like the authorities were hoping to set up an event.
	Kind of like, you know, bringing people over the border.
	The only solution to mass shootings is science says, we're unarmed, please don't shoot us.
	Yeah, says Rabid Roach.
	So... Harp says, AI, the newest Russian drones, can choose their own targets when they're in an area.
	Autonomous Terminator machines are already on the battlefield.
	Yep. Yep. And that's one of the reasons, I think, why they are doing this.
	I think these people at one level, certainly they've got their big designs in terms of controlling energy and all the rest of the stuff.
	But they like to keep these wars going everywhere because it's also a training, live fire training for their troops and also testing for their weapons.
	You know, that was a big part of all these wars going back to Vietnam.
	Pirate loots.
	ChatGPT is also a huge recording device.
	Also be aware, yes, be aware of discords and chats that you join with ChatGPT in it.
	As you may think that it's a private group, but not with a ChatGPT plugin in it.
	Yes, good advice.
	Octo spook. CO2 is the most important plant food.
	And all life gets its carbon from plants.
	And all life is carbon-based life forms on Earth.
	Which explains why they want to get rid of CO2. These people, they want to kill everybody.
	Which brings us back to the global Baltimore.
	And again, this is Solari.
	This is Catherine Austin Fitz's organization.
	They said Dutch farmers and fishermen represent the canary in the coal mine in a battle to destroy agriculture worldwide.
	Everything that is happening there in the Netherlands is being replicated also in the U.S. and Canada, Australia, and throughout Europe.
	A lot more means death by hunger.
	And it was intentionally inflicted on Ukrainian peasants during 1932 and 1933, killing at least 5 million.
	And again, that was the most fertile agricultural region in the Soviet Union.
	And Stalin wanted to show his power by starving those people, who were also his political enemies as he perceived them.
	But he saw everybody as a political enemy, essentially.
	This paper represents every facet of the attack in the Netherlands.
	There is still time to thwart these evil plans, but the vast majority of the intended victims have no clue.
	And this is a very long paper, and I'm not going to get into all the details.
	Just give you the executive summary here.
	But if you want to see it, you can find a link to it.
	You can find it at Solari.com.
	In the case of the Laudamore, this was the first genocide methodically planned out and perpetrated by depriving the very people who were producing food of their nourishment for survival.
	What is especially horrific Is that the withholding of the food was used as a weapon of genocide, and that it was done in a region of the world known as the breadbasket of Europe, says Professor Andrea Graziosi out of Naples.
	In 2022, Dutch farmers made worldwide news when they began protesting government plans to move them off of their lands.
	And again, that was justified by, well, we've got to get rid of nitrogen.
	And I've talked about the fact that they intercepted people with fertilizer.
	That's contraband. You can't bring that in here.
	It's like, what are you talking about?
	But less known is the fact that Dutch fishermen are also being driven out of their centuries-old fishing grounds as wind farms and protected natural areas, quote-unquote, take their place.
	Can't fish here anymore. Why?
	Well, this is going to be a natural area.
	What's the justification for it?
	Well, they don't have to give you one.
	This is just, we understand what the agenda is.
	The land grab is speeding up.
	The UN agenda to expand the amount of land set aside for protection, quote-unquote, is accelerating.
	And simultaneously, BlackRock and other asset managers and private equity investors are buying up large tracts of land worldwide.
	Cities are rapidly turning into open-air prisons.
	Heavily surveilled smart cities divided into 15-minute zones.
	And, of course, we know all of the aspirations of the group called C40. No meat.
	No dairy. You get to buy three articles of clothing once a year.
	Every three years, you get to take a flight of less than 1,000 miles.
	No private cars and on and on.
	A lot of different things.
	But that's enough for you to understand what's really going on with this.
	If you look at the fact that they're pushing everybody off the land and just banning the farmers from being on the land, this goes back to what was happening to the Bundys, the Bundy Ranch.
	That was all Agenda 21, even before they started calling it the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
	It was Agenda 21.
	Their maps showed how they were going to concentrate everybody into a few megacities, and the rest of the country would be off-limits Protected as natural areas.
	Which means that they've got to get everybody, they've got to get the farmers off the land as well.
	And they've got a lot of different ways to do it.
	But it wasn't just the farmers and that area there, the Bundy Ranch.
	It's also, as they pointed out at the time, they were doing the same thing to people who had...
	Lost my train of thought here because I pulled a plug on this thing here.
	They had the same thing with people who were miners, people who had water rights, grazing rights, lumber rights, all of these things they were shutting down.
	To understand the challenges that the Dutch farmers and the fishermen are facing, the Solari report wanted to speak to them directly.
	In the spring of 2023, the writer conducted in-depth interviews with eight Dutch farmers and fishermen.
	The interviews form a picture from the horse's mouth of the tsunami of policies that are making it increasingly impossible for farmers and fishermen to keep producing food.
	They warn that the means of food production are being undermined, moved abroad, or in other ways concentrated into the hands of multinational companies.
	And so, again, this is all about central control of everything, especially the food.
	We're going to take a quick break, and I'm going to reconnect when I just kicked apart here with my foot.
	Stay with us.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Oh yeah, we've got to not do that though now.
	They've just done a 180 because that's what these people do all the time.
	Oh, we're going to go into a new ice age and then eight years later, oh, it's going to be global warming.
	Then after that doesn't show up, they say, well, it's just climate change.
	And anything that happens, we have unusual weather that we can identify anywhere.
	That's proof. We're not going to show you our data, of course.
	And so now, after they've been saying we're going to plant trees, which makes sense if you think that's an issue, and even getting carbon credits for planting trees, now they have just switched and said that trees are a threat.
	We're going to have to cut them down and bury them under the ground.
	And Bill Gates says, yeah, are we the idiots here?
	Not for doing that, but for planting trees.
	And so now, if you plant trees, you're the idiot.
	This is insane.
	It really is. And it is a big con game where the media and the powers that be are telling everybody that 2 plus 2 equals 5.
	Just take carbon and oxygen off the periodic table of elements there.
	The problem is solved, says Georgia Boy, 1142.
	Octospook, there is a war on plants, fertilizers, water, land, micronutrients, CO2, etc.
	It's all about starving humans, yes.
	Gene Whitworth, mainstream media draws you into the less relevant climate issues to hide the worst ones, like they do with guns and a lot of other issues, yeah.
	OctoSpook says, David is on it.
	Our whole food chain is under attack.
	They're even going to be making pet food out of insects, and human food, of course.
	Wife and I do not leave home without a weapon.
	We often err on the side of caution.
	Nothing needs genetic modification.
	I think God knew exactly what God was doing, says George Boyd 1142.
	It is an amazing system of...
	It's a complimentary closed system, if you will.
	And if you look at it, it truly is amazing.
	And when we look at it, we can see God's design.
	And these people look at it, and I'm sure they see God's design as well.
	Heavens declares glory, and the fool has said in his heart, there is no God.
	And the fools are telling us, the fools with the money and the power, are telling us that we're all going to die if we don't destroy this designed system.
	If you raise a garden, do not buy Monsanto seeds.
	Yeah, that's for sure. Don't use glyphosate either.
	It's already permeated everything.
	All plants are already super plants, says Pirate Lutz.
	Yeah. They are.
	And he puts that in all plants.
	They are super food. Tony Garrett.
	If you can get them, pay extra for heirloom seeds.
	Yes, exactly right.
	Let's take a look at the crimes of the lockdowns and the pandemics and the vaccines.
	They have taken a look at it in New Zealand.
	And it's kind of interesting there.
	They have the Maori government, the indigenous people there, who put up quite a fight.
	I mean, they were a real formidable problem for the British trying to take over New Zealand.
	They had earthen forts, which the British could not destroy with their cannons.
	They were cannibals as well.
	But they also learned how, once they would capture weapons from the British, they learned how to use them and use their own weapons back against them.
	And perhaps that's what they're doing right now.
	The Maori government, and we'll tell you what the Maori government is.
	This is not...
	The political government that you see in New Zealand...
	Where Jab Sinda Arden was running this scam, and they were letting people who were essential, elite, if you will, not have to get the jab, secretly doing that.
	And now those documents have come out, and that was in a country that was the most draconian in terms of enforcing this stuff.
	Even if you had an adverse reaction to the first shot, they would force you to take additional shots.
	And so that outrage happened, and perhaps that is one of the reasons why.
	But they're starting to scrape through and find out what happened there.
	And so a Maori government, and it's not the same thing, but you can think of it as a citizen's grand jury, if you will, that we would do here.
	But there's more to it, and I'll explain what the Maori government is.
	But they have prosecuted Convicted and sentenced four high-ranking New Zealand officials, as well as 118 members of Parliament to prison for facilitating these criminal actions.
	This needs to happen everywhere.
	Now, what is this Maori government?
	Well, first of all, it goes back to their history, to the early 1800s.
	And the Maoris were the indigenous people.
	They were recognized in pre- and post-treaty British imperial law.
	And I have to say, the Maori are held in high regard in New Zealand.
	Everybody wants to claim, you know, as part of the woke stuff, it's cool to be a Native American, I guess, or whatever.
	Well, it's cool to be a Maori there.
	So there's going to be a certain social cachet with this that's going to help them.
	The first collective form of Maori government came about in 1805.
	And translated into English texts as the Chiefs of the Confederation of the United Tribes of New Zealand.
	And since 1835, this organization has been recognized under international law as the lawful government of New Zealand.
	So they signed in 1835, a large group of northern chiefs signed a treaty and With this declaration, the British recognized New Zealand as a sovereign state.
	An article in the Otago Daily Times explained, the main parts of the document declare that New Zealand is an independent nation, that all sovereign power resides collectively with the chiefs, that no government can exist unless appointed by them, and that they request that the then British king would be a protector from all attempts upon its independence, quote-unquote. In other words, kind of a we the people type of thing, right?
	The British Colonial Office agreed to do this as long as the Maori protected British citizens living in New Zealand, including their property rights, their human rights, and their freedom of choice.
	Well, the problem is, as Russell Means pointed out in his book, Where White Men Fear to Tread, he said, the American government has broken every treaty it ever made with the Indians.
	And he goes, the treaty that they made with you, white man, is called the Constitution.
	And they've broken every aspect of that as well.
	What are you going to do about it?
	And that's basically where they are.
	But I'm glad that they put this thing together, went through a legal process to show what really should be happening.
	So they say this Treaty of Waitangi is widely accepted as a constitutional document that establishes and guides a relationship between the Crown and New Zealand.
	Embodied by the New Zealand government and the Maori.
	So they're saying, well, you know, we've had this Maori government has been in recess, is the way they put it.
	We're going to reconstitute it.
	The website says that we recently re-emerged out of necessity to provide shelter in the form of the native Maori jurisdiction.
	Pressures surround people of the land due to the implementation of specific plans originating from the Crown and beyond, spanning the entire globe.
	And so that's what the background of what this organization is.
	But again, like I said, you can kind of think of it, although they've got a long legal tradition that they can refer to and claim as authority, It's very much like a citizen grand jury.
	So what have they decided?
	Well, they convicted four officials of COVID crimes.
	Unfortunately, they didn't come after Jab Senda Arden.
	I don't understand. You know, they need to cast this net a little bit wider.
	I think all these medical professionals who were given, secretly given and told, don't talk about it.
	Given an exemption because they were essential.
	Well, what does that tell you?
	That tells you that they knew that there was a high chance that they were going to get harmed by this.
	Oh, well, we need you still there.
	So don't take this thing that we're going to have you administer to other people and tell them it's perfectly safe.
	Talk about fraud on a high level.
	17th of June, 2023.
	A dedicated team of men and women opened the first sovereign, independent, grand jury court of justice for the Maori government.
	The first case was brought on behalf of all the people of New Zealand, they said, and referred back to the 1835 Declaration and also to crimes of genocide and crimes against humanity.
	Four high-ranking New Zealand government officials are summoned to appear before the court to have charges against them confirmed.
	Minister for Public Health Service Andrew Little, former Prime Minister Christopher Hipkins, former Director General of Health Ashley Bloomfield, and MedSafe Group Manager Christopher James.
	None of them, of course, showed up.
	No response. So they went ahead with a trial.
	They convicted them, told them to show up for the sentencing, but of course, they did not as well.
	They were found guilty of breaches of the Declaration of Independence of the United Tribes of New Zealand, guilty of committing crimes in their response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
	And the four individuals, or three of the four individuals named, were sentenced to 10 years in prison, liquidation of all their assets, banned from holding office in the future, banned from leaving New Zealand, and to be further investigated for crimes against humanity.
	Well, that's a good start.
	For those types, I would like to see that happening to a lot of people in the American government and every other government because every government on earth is guilty of these crimes against humanity.
	These genocidal crimes.
	One of the four was sentenced to five years in prison and the rest of this liquidation of assets, ban from politics, ban from leaving, that type of thing.
	Then they also held a tribunal looking at the culpability of members of parliament and 118 members of Parliament were accused and found guilty of supporting and facilitating the actions of these convicted criminals.
	All 118 were sentenced to between 3 and 10 years in prison, financial penalties, banned from holding office in the future, banned from leaving New Zealand, and also to be further investigated for crimes against humanity.
	They don't have the power to enforce this.
	They do have a good legal argument, but they don't have the power to enforce this.
	But this is a pattern for what everybody should be looking for everywhere.
	This is what should happen.
	Steve Kirsch is saying the vaccine killed three and a half times more Americans than COVID virus.
	It wasn't the virus that killed anybody.
	It was hospital death protocols reported as the virus killing people.
	But again, he did this.
	It's like online surveys and things like that.
	I think that it, quite frankly, is a much higher number.
	But we all understand what has happened here.
	And so he says there's other people who have come up with similar things.
	He talks about Wayne Allen Root.
	He says he has numbers that are even more skewed, 30 to 1.
	The probabilities here are so astronomical that even if the ratio isn't at least 3.5%, Wayne Root, example, couldn't even exist if I interviewed every person on earth, he says.
	But still, again, Wayne Allen Root still promotes Trump, the father of the vaccine, and cynically tells him, don't talk about the vaccine.
	Trump ought to be banned from life, from taking political office because of his involvement in this.
	Biden should be banned for life because of his involvement in this.
	And yet there are two front runners.
	Isn't that amazing? And pretty much everybody else that is running was involved in this as well, including Ramaswamy, who was part of the COVID response team in Ohio.
	They are all guilty of this.
	And so, RFK Jr.
	is not guilty of that. He's got some other issues there.
	The Rasmussen survey found the COVID vaccine killed as many people as COVID. Again, they died from the hospital death protocol or from other things, other respiratory illnesses that were labeled as COVID. And again, if you believe there's a virus, you also understand that ivermectin or droxychloroquine would have been a safe and effective treatment to stop any of that.
	The American public and 75% of the public believes the narrative took the jab, wouldn't be able to spot a vaccine death, even if it happened on the same day as vaccine, says Stephen Kirsch, and he is right.
	That's where we are right now.
	So, that brings us to, again, more articles being written about Rand Paul.
	This one from the American Conservative.
	I have a picture of Rand Paul.
	Headline is, Exposing Deception.
	Rand Paul is taking his fight against Fauci to the next level.
	No, this is a massive misdirection, as I've said before.
	Senator Rand Paul has a new book called Deception.
	The great COVID cover-up.
	The irony of this is that what he is doing in terms of focusing on the Wuhan lab is the biggest cover-up of the hospital death protocol and the vaccine that we could possibly have.
	That's amazing. And so Rand Paul calls it the great deception.
	He is a part of the great deception to keep us from seeing what happened with the lockdowns, with the hospital protocols, and with the vaccine.
	No, no, no. Let's go back and focus on Fauci and Wuhan in the Chinese.
	There is a veil of silence over excess deaths.
	Not science, silence.
	This is from the Brownstone Institute.
	A deafening silence over excess deaths from governments.
	And also, you know, a great deception from Rand Paul.
	But Andrew Bridgen, and I played, I showed you some of his speech, where he has called for debate.
	Nobody wants to talk about the excess deaths.
	He called for it many times, and a couple dozen times, they kept shutting it down.
	Finally, they said, we can talk for 20 minutes.
	And there was only two or three people from Parliament who showed up to hear it.
	The gallery was full of visitors, and the gallery cheered him on.
	But these criminals in Parliament don't care.
	They're just as criminally involved in this as the people in New Zealand's Parliament.
	He said,"...we've experienced more excess deaths since July 2021 than in the whole of 2020." These deaths are not disproportionately, however, of the old.
	These excess deaths are striking down people in the prime of their life, but no one seems to care.
	I fear that history will not judge this house kindly.
	Excess deaths have been seen across all age groups, he pointed out during his speech.
	Again, the real plague, the real pandemic was that.
	But of course, having a vaccine, everybody wants something to be a vaccine, and so now we have the bizarre idea that Brazilian scientists were only in the United States do we have more people addicted to cocaine.
	Isn't the drug war great?
	The drug war has been so effective for 50 years.
	We have more people addicted to cocaine than anywhere else, and we probably could go down a whole long list of drugs that we prohibited, that we have more addiction to.
	It just doesn't work.
	And it creates a lot of other big problems.
	But in Brazil, they've got some scientists who decided that they can stop cocaine addiction by, not by prohibition, but by a vaccine.
	Isn't it amazing? Everything in the world can be fixed by government prohibition or vaccine.
	That's it. Everything. There's not a problem on earth that can't be fixed by a government prohibition or by a vaccine, isn't it?
	And so now they say they've got a way to stop cocaine addiction with a vaccine.
	They call it Calyx Coca.
	And they have shown promising results in trials on animals, they said.
	They can trigger an immune response that blocks cocaine and crack from reaching the brain, which researchers hope will help users break the cycle of addiction.
	So addicts would no longer get high from cocaine.
	They would have to try to find a different drug to escape reality and destroy themselves.
	Because that's largely what is happening.
	You do have some people want to get off of what they have been addicted to.
	But for the most part, people are looking for a way to escape reality.
	They'll do all kinds of crazy stuff.
	If the treatment gets regulatory approval, it would be the first time that cocaine addiction is treated using a vaccine.
	Again, to call it a vaccine.
	Why would you call it a vaccine? Well, for two reasons.
	Because it's not a vaccine.
	It's a therapeutic. Why would you call a therapeutic a vaccine?
	So that you could get it approved without any scrutiny.
	We've now established that.
	And so that you could have protection against legal liability.
	I'm sure. That's the reasons that they want to do this.
	And of course, it's also really cool.
	Well, we got a vaccine for that?
	Oh, great. Every problem on earth can be solved with a government prohibition or with a vaccine.
	And so here we have, instead of government prohibition, which didn't work, we're going to try now a vaccine.
	It's actually therapeutic.
	But take a look at how it works and ask yourself if this might have some unexpected adverse effects.
	The vaccine works by triggering patients' immune system to produce antibodies that bind to cocaine molecules in the bloodstream, making them too large to pass into the brain's mesolimbic system.
	So I wonder what would happen to that if you start getting this coagulating thing happening.
	I can't imagine what the downside of this could be.
	Similar studies have been carried out in the United States, which is the world's top cocaine consumer.
	They said they found that it protected rat fetuses against cocaine, so you don't have any crack babies.
	So we're going to want to and maybe require That pregnant women get this shot.
	What's that going to do to the baby?
	Show me the money! Exactly, that's it.
	Show me the money!
	It's all about the money, isn't it?
	It definitely is.
	The vaccine is made with chemical compounds designed in the lab rather than with biological or natural ingredients.
	Oh, meaning it'll be less expensive.
	And it won't have to be stored at super cold temperatures.
	Oh, that's great.
	A true panacea for drug addiction.
	And so, let's talk a little bit about the magic mushroom thing, because Washington Post has gotten onto that now.
	And I had somebody who got very upset with me, sent me a long letter.
	And I want to read that, because I don't want to ignore the criticism I get.
	He said, it's very well known that natural psychoactive drug trips help people break through illusions that cause separation and division, and show people that God is in all of us.
	And that we are love, compassion, and light.
	Well, that's not what the Bible says.
	And that's not what I believe.
	I don't believe that God is in all of us.
	That is a particular religious viewpoint.
	That's your religious viewpoint.
	It's not my religious viewpoint.
	He says that at times you come off as self-righteous and too preachy.
	So, warning. Warning.
	This is your preachy warning.
	I'm about to get real preachy here.
	Because, you know what, I can't sit idly by, and I began the comments with that.
	I said, understand that pharmaceuticals, the purpose of pharmaceuticals have for the longest time, and they've stated it.
	It's about making money, and they make money by not curing you of anything.
	And usually the adverse effects that come with those pharmaceuticals start to multiply.
	You know, well, you take this.
	Okay, well, it minimizes the effect from that condition you took it for.
	But now you've got multiple other adverse effects.
	And so now we've got some drugs for those.
	And guess what? They've also got multiple adverse effects.
	And so it starts to multiply.
	See this very frequently with people my age as you get older.
	And so I'm not going to sit quietly by.
	And watch people walk into a January the 6th trap.
	I'm not going to sit quietly by and watch people inject themselves with mRNA vaccines that haven't been tested and are known to be harmful.
	And I'm not going to quietly sit by and not say something when I see something like this that I think is going to be harmful.
	I'm not going to sit quietly by.
	My preachy Christian attitude is I'm not going to sit quietly by as somebody sleepwalks into eternal punishment either.
	And I know that that makes us very – that's what I strongly believe.
	And I'm not going to equivocate about that.
	And so if you want to call me preachy, Keith, that's what that's about.
	I'm not going to stay silent about something that I truly believe is going to hurt somebody.
	Now, what I will not do, what I did not call for yesterday, was for your psychedelic mushrooms to be banned.
	I don't think that works.
	And the only thing I'm calling to be banned is this poison that Trump put out there and brags about.
	And that Biden mandate.
	That should be banned.
	We know that is a poison.
	But these other things, if somebody wants to take them, even though I believe it's harmful, I don't want the government to come in and ban that.
	But I'm not going to remain silent about it, because I strongly believe that it is harmful.
	I know that some people believe in drugs.
	I know some people believe in psychiatry.
	Some people believe in pharmaceutical drugs and modern medicine and hospitals and all the rest of this stuff.
	I'm not looking to control somebody's life.
	But again, I don't believe that God is in all of us.
	I think all of us are fallen.
	I don't believe that humanity is basically good.
	I believe exactly the opposite of that.
	And so are the founders of this country.
	Because men are evil.
	We need to have government to restrain men.
	But then since government is made up of men, how do we restrain that government?
	That is the big question.
	Who watches the watchers?
	Who restrains the people who have that kind of power?
	And so...
	He says, microdosing LSD and mushrooms has been shown to help people immensely with PTSD and other anxiety disorders with no ill effects and does not even remotely get you high.
	I disagree with that strongly.
	And I think that what you're seeing here is a cover-up of what is a deep psychological problem.
	You're covering up problems instead of addressing them.
	And if you look at what people are saying about these psychedelic mushrooms and other things like that, it rewires your brain, it rewires your thinking, it changes your memory, it does other things like that.
	It doesn't address the fundamental issue.
	If you address the fundamental issue, you get stronger.
	And the fundamental issue is that you're not good.
	None of us are. And you need to understand and come to terms with whatever it is that you're struggling with.
	Whether it is you're trying to escape from reality and get something that takes you to a place that is artificial.
	You know, I regard these drugs, alcohol included, as similar to what they're trying to do with this with virtual reality and things like that.
	Just drop out of life.
	Rather than addressing the problems that you've got and getting stronger by addressing those problems.
	But I'm not for prohibiting alcohol.
	I'm not for prohibiting tobacco or any of this stuff, even though we know that they are harmful.
	I think we need to tell people, however, that they're harmful.
	Instead of lying to them and telling them that they're good for them.
	And I think when you see something that is a poison, like these vaccines, we need to ban that.
	But that's about the only thing I'm looking to ban.
	And then he goes on with the issue of, he says, when they're using it on children, my assumption would be well-supervised micro-dosing for anxiety, depression, and ADHD type of disorders.
	Well, you understand they would say the same thing.
	They're doing a lot of supervision and counseling and all the rest of the stuff when they mutilate these children.
	We don't know what the long-term effects on this are.
	It's going to have different effects on children.
	And shame on you for pushing something that is untested and has severe potential for side effects.
	Shame on you for pushing that on children without being properly tested.
	Have we not learned anything from any of this stuff?
	From the mRNA vaccines?
	From the mutilation of children?
	Sexual mutilation, these castrating drugs and all the rest of this stuff?
	Have we not learned anything about that?
	He says, not everybody believes or will believe in Christ.
	Yes, I know. But some people believe in drugs.
	Some people believe in psychiatrists.
	And some people believe Fauci.
	What do you trust?
	Who do you trust? That's the question.
	You see, you may believe Fauci, or you may believe Joe Rogan selling mushrooms or whatever.
	I believe what is written in the Bible, and I believe it Because there's many proofs and evidence, whether you're talking about geology or prophecy, and we've got carbon dating to show that these things were predicted centuries before they happened.
	And the testimony, the personal testimony of people who are eyewitnesses.
	It's one of the reasons why I had J. Warner Wallace on.
	Cold case Christianity.
	He says, you know, you have somebody who is writing something down, and they know that they're going to be punished for it, perhaps killed.
	They don't recant that testimony.
	That's really strong when you're looking at something, and you can't interrogate the people personally, yourself.
	So, again, I believe that very strongly, but I'm not out there to try to baptize anybody at the point of a gun.
	I'm not going to use government coercion for a particular religion or religion that I agree with.
	I'm not pushing for government prohibition of anything other than the Trump shots that are out there, the poison.
	But I'm not going to remain silent about the harm that is out there.
	He goes on to say, and of course this is a common argument against what the Bible says, that Buddhists, Taoists, Hindus, and others, some of whom are far more loving and kind than the majority of supposed Christians out there.
	I agree. When I talked to George Barna, as he pointed out, we have a lot of people who say that they're Christians, but do they live the life?
	He said, we looked at it, and we identified and said, well, of the people who self-identify as Christians, only about 4% of them actually follow what is there.
	They live their life in open contradiction to what they say they believe.
	And we could ask a question, okay, when you talk about these different other groups, okay?
	Muslims, Jews, Christians, Buddhists, Taoists, you have different groups who believe and do different things.
	Who is a Muslim, by the way?
	Is a Muslim somebody who prays in a certain way at a certain time of day every day?
	Is a Jew somebody who wears a particular type of clothing like an Orthodox Jew does or something?
	How do you identify a Christian?
	Is it what they say they are or is it what they do in terms of their life?
	Really, for Christians, it's different.
	It isn't based on a bunch of things that we do.
	I know there are some Christians who do believe that.
	But it's not based on what we do.
	It's based on who we trust and the things that Jesus has done.
	That's something that's different about Christians.
	And so some people will look at that and say, well, that gives me an excuse to do whatever I want.
	And if we look, again, George Barna will tell you that if you look at the way self-identified Christians look in their life and what they do, it doesn't really change from the general population, which would indicate to many of us that they are not really Christians. which would indicate to many of us that they are They're not any different from Buddhists or Taoists or Muslims or anyone else out there self-identifying as that.
	So that is the real issue, I think.
	And when we look at the issue of magic mushrooms, there's a big push right now on that.
	It is banned from some people, by some people, and they're trying to get it legalized in other places.
	And again, I don't believe that prohibition works.
	And perhaps even education doesn't work.
	But whether or not somebody listens to me, I'm going to try to warn them if I see that they're going to step off the curve in front of a Mack truck that's coming at them.
	So, Washington Post has their article, what do magic mushrooms do to your brain?
	A mid-flight crisis raises questions.
	So, about sleep deprivation, about psychosis that might be brought on by the psychedelic mushrooms.
	Depression, alcohol use, disorder, all of these have been identified as things that magic mushrooms could fix.
	And again, to be fair, what Keith says is that this guy obviously took a hero dose and was not supervised by a shaman or a doctor who was well-versed in this medicine.
	Anybody can have a bad trip, but the vast majority of people who take psychoactive natural drugs come out on the other side of the trip with more love and compassion for other humans, animals, and planet than we ever thought possible.
	So I've heard. I'm not seeing the proof of it.
	Show me your proof. You're making an extraordinary claim here.
	So I'll see the proof. I don't believe it, quite frankly.
	I believe that it is something that they may have believed they did, but I don't think that that's exactly what happened.
	I keep losing my place on here whenever I pull that paper up here.
	Hang on a second. I want to get to the Washington Post article, and I've now pushed off of this thing twice.
	Here we are. Again, so it's got a long list of things that supposedly it fixes.
	It cures depression, alcohol use, also study to help people quit smoking, OCD, obsessive compulsive disorder, anorexia, PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety.
	It sounds like it's a panacea, doesn't it?
	Maybe it's being oversold.
	Even two of the same type of mushrooms grown next to each other can have a wildly different amount of psilocybin, said one person.
	Well, they're trying to understand what happened with this guy since he didn't have a sorcerer with him or somebody else with a pharmakia.
	Again, talk about a shaman.
	This is deeply religious.
	And obviously, Keith, you don't share the same beliefs that I do.
	And I understand that it is an offense to people.
	For Christians to say that there is no way to God except through Jesus, but that's what he said.
	No one comes to the Father but through me.
	No one. And you're not going to get there by doing mushrooms.
	It's going to take you perhaps to a dark place that you don't want to go.
	So the circumstances under which he took these are not known, says the Washington Post.
	But psilocybin binds to specific serotonin receptors.
	We began the program, almost at the beginning, by talking about SSRIs.
	SSRIs are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
	It's stuff that binds to the serotonin.
	And when people are on these serotonin reuptake inhibitors, they do really crazy, dangerous things.
	Here's psilocybin that binds to the serotonin receptors.
	Could there be a connection besides the connection how these things work?
	Could there be a connection to their behavior for doing this type of thing?
	Not everybody who takes SSRIs turns into a murder-suicide event.
	But do they share a common mechanism here?
	So the psilocybin binds to serotonin receptors.
	Effects that aren't fully understood.
	Now, nobody wants to look at it when it's produced by the pharmaceutical companies because they own the press.
	But they will look at it when it's there with the magic mushrooms, which are a competition to the synthetic pharmaceuticals.
	But not necessarily any better.
	So, the media, which is owned by the pharmaceutical companies, will look at it with a very, you know, skeptical eye.
	But it doesn't mean that it's good just because they don't like it.
	After someone takes psilocybin, brain regions that don't typically communicate with each other start to communicate in new ways.
	And so, as they're pointing out, kind of rewires things, doesn't it?
	Well, again, we can communicate in new ways.
	We can have our life changed, and we can do it by growing.
	And I just look at this as, you know, what Christ can do in our life is very different than what we turn to in these artificial enhancements.
	What you believe is real is really going to determine what happens in this life and in eternity.
	We'll take a quick break and we'll come back and read some of your comments.
	Stay with us. Music Analyzing
	The Globalist Next Move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	you you All right, and we're about to join with Guard Goldsmith, but before we do, I'm going to respond to at least one of these comments here.
	Trump Burger Forever says, Does David really believe that taking psychedelics will hurt your connection with God?
	I see why he feels that so strongly, but he is wrong.
	Does David feel the same way about children with seizures who take cannabis to stop their symptoms?
	Well, those are two very different things.
	When you talk about making a connection with God, shaman, and the rest of this stuff, you understand the term pharmakia, even though I think that it does apply.
	It's interesting that, you know, the term pharmaceuticals has the same root word for drugs and that type of thing, but it was typically translated as sorcery.
	Because hallucinogenics and psychedelics are not what we're talking about with somebody using cannabis to stop the seizures that in many cases were caused by somebody by childhood vaccine, uncontrollable seizures.
	I don't think these kids are having psychedelic episodes with it.
	They're stopping the tremors.
	In the same way that I think a lot of the palliative care that is given to people, it can be abused.
	But I think if somebody has a tremendous amount of pain, you give them something that a person who doesn't have pain can't.
	Can get highly addicted to.
	It doesn't have the same working mechanism for somebody who is suffering a great deal of pain because they've got, let's say, stomach cancer.
	And you give them some opium or something.
	It doesn't get them addicted to opium simply because it is just because of the pain receptors that are there.
	It's a very different mechanism.
	But I do say that it is going to hurt your connection with God because the psychedelics have always been there.
	That's why they call them sorcery.
	It was part of every religion, except for Christianity and Judaism, part of every religion to take these psychedelics to connect with an alternative reality.
	And so that's why I say I do not support psychedelics.
	I really do believe that you're tapping into something there.
	Look at what people are saying about DMT. I really do believe that there is something there.
	It makes you susceptible to things that are around.
	And you can believe that or not, but that is what I believe.
	So joining us now is, and we'll do a change away from this topic, Gard Goldsmith.
	Great to talk to you, Gard. Thank you for joining us.
	Thanks for having me on, David.
	And terrific conversations.
	I agree with you 100%.
	Well, I won't throw you into that briar patch, but...
	No. Well, you know, I was just sitting here having my mulek meat and mealworm on the side meal, and I just thought...
	I've got to join the future.
	I don't know. I need to learn all this new stuff.
	Hey, by the way, I just wanted to compliment you again for bringing up.
	I literally had this right next to me when you brought up Cold Case Christianity, and I got it because of you.
	So thank you so much.
	You've done so much to help me.
	Well, that's Jay Warner Wallace who did that.
	He did a great job, and he had an interesting journey to get to that point.
	It really was. A very interesting book.
	Yeah. Absolutely.
	Yeah, when we're looking at this, they really do want us into some kind of a Soylent Green thing, isn't it?
	Isn't it amazing how they just take all these science fiction movies and they start implementing them, whether it's Soylent Green or 1984 or Brave New World?
	I mean, it's crazy. It's crazy.
	They disconnect you from the natural world and how you might feed yourself and getting connected to the soil and getting connected to your neighbors.
	And as you were talking about with the psychedelics, Disconnecting from God and changing your biochemical state in such a way that you're actually connected to a shaman to do something about that.
	It's crazy.
	To bring it up, you talked about that crime spree, the murder spree in Maine, and whether or not the man was on psychoactive drugs.
	It's crazy. Nobody's really talking about that.
	Why isn't that part of the conversation?
	And isn't it interesting that when the Washington Post says, you know, so these psychedelics connect with serotonin, and we don't really know what's going on there.
	And it's like, yeah, and you're not interested in finding out as long as it's the big pharmaceutical companies doing it.
	You might question it when it is coming up with something as a competitor to the pharmaceutical companies like Magic Mushrooms, but you're not interested in it when it's their SSRIs that's doing it.
	They don't want to talk about it at all.
	Right, right. And as you said, there's a difference between mandating and compelling people not to take these things to the force of the state, engaging in aggression to tell people don't do that, and preaching to people, just offering what I think is a good way to go.
	And you might want to try this.
	And, you know, I worked in a bookstore for many years part time and and we carried a lot of the Alcoholics Anonymous recovery material, the books, the recovery medallions for their 24 hours, the one month and so on.
	So a lot of the anonymous guys would actually come in and I'd have great conversations with them, learning about so many of the patterns that emerged in the conversations.
	And I would say, you know, I talked to this other guy.
	Is that similar with you?
	And it was always the things that I learned are actually very applicable to anybody, even if they don't have the classic, you know, termed addictive problems, which is that they would typically look at their opportunity to ingest some sort of a drug and get away from things as their opportunity. which is that they would typically look at their opportunity It's their chance.
	They've sacrificed so much.
	Now it's my time to get away.
	So a mother would go into the car and drink or, you know, do something like taking heroin or something like that because they just felt that this is my time to withdraw and get away and this is my release valve.
	I think a lot of us feel those sorts of feelings.
	Especially if you've got that tendency, how do you guard against that and protect yourself and make it a fruitful thing to release a little bit of pressure?
	How do you do it in a positive way?
	Can you help somebody else while you're doing it and have fun?
	Can you learn something?
	Yeah, you know, we can do that in a lot of different ways.
	I mean, we can escape by watching TV or movies or sports or something like that.
	Or we can get obsessed with it.
	You know, we can make it so that all we do is sit there and watch TV. And now we're not living our life.
	We've lost our life because we're sitting there on the couch in front of television all the time.
	Especially, you know, with sports.
	Somebody can become a real sports fanatic.
	Or there's nothing inherently wrong with it.
	Unless it becomes this thing that you lean on because it's an escape out of life.
	And then when it's this thing that you're trying to escape with and it kind of takes over your life, that's when it becomes bad.
	And, of course, that can be anything.
	It could be food.
	It could be anything in your life as it starts to dominate and take over your life and take you out of life.
	At that point, it becomes evil.
	But yeah, you're right. We're not trying to, even things that I would think are harmful, I'm not trying to get the government to ban them, except, as I said, the mRNA, because I believe that's an outright poison to kill shot.
	But in general, I don't believe in prohibition, and I'm not trying to force anybody into a particular religion or to agree with me in religion.
	And I don't want the government doing that either, because what happens is the government winds up Destroying that church that it joins.
	It joins the church and then destroys the church.
	And we know people like that, too.
	So true. So true.
	Look what they've done with marriage, for goodness sake.
	And thank you again for about a year ago reading that piece that I wrote about marriage on Substack.
	Don't put the state before God when it comes to marriage.
	Going into the history of it and how they tried to stop blacks and whites from marrying.
	It's supposed to be a religious ceremony.
	And if you're going to get the government defining what marriage is...
	And you're going to have command and control, central control of things.
	You're not going to get what you want because the people who are going to be in charge won't be the people eventually that you want to be in charge.
	That's right. Marriage is a good example.
	It really is a good example of the mixture of church and state because it was a religious thing and then the government gets involved in it.
	The next thing you know, government has defined it and defined it in a way to match with their religion of secular humanism, for example.
	And then prohibited all other opinions about marriage.
	And that's what they do in a broad sense on any kind of religion when you have the government getting into a religion.
	They're going to wind up taking it in a direction that you probably don't want.
	Yeah, yeah. And, you know, it reminds me, actually, of that statement from the 19th century economist, Frederick Bossier, political philosopher, where he said, the state is that great fiction by which everyone endeavors to live off of everyone else.
	And perhaps as some folks want to celebrate Halloween, it is very vampiric.
	And, you know, it's an interesting thing because it removes people, because they think, Everything's being decided in this sandbox.
	More stuff, more toys have been thrown into the sandbox.
	And they don't see that. It comes at the expense of their neighbor.
	It comes at their expense. They say it is coming at their expense.
	So I have to dive in too.
	I have to decide how this is going to be steered.
	I've got to get aboard this ship and...
	No, I don't want it. This is the moral culpability that is the problem.
	You know, we've discussed on my streaming show, we've discussed Israel and Hamas.
	And I constantly hear, especially conservative talk radio hosts, they're saying, well, what are we going to do about it?
	And it's the all-inclusive government statist we.
	It's like, no, I don't want to be part of your we.
	Why? Why are you taking the royal we and claiming that somehow it represents me?
	And I mention on my show as well, the New York Times bomber, one of the very few who actually was a terrorist that they got a number of years ago, who was going to get a car and they ended up replacing the explosives that the guy thought that he was going to blow up in Times Square.
	Yeah. Not New York Times, Times Square.
	And they asked him, how do you plead?
	And he said, I'm almost quoting verbatim.
	He said, guilty, guilty, a thousand times guilty.
	And if the U.S. government continues to do what it is doing in the Middle East, more American civilians are going to die.
	Because they buy into the same canard that we do.
	It's the royal we that they've translated from, you know, old royal days where the monarch was, les têtes, c'est moi, I am the state, to now, you are all the state.
	Exactly. It's all wonderful. It's kumbaya.
	It's we. And they've wrapped their arms around you through force.
	Just leave me alone.
	I don't want to be molested.
	Just leave me alone. I don't need Joe Biden sniffing my...
	Well, I don't have any hair, but you know what I mean.
	Yeah, we look at all the different things that the U.S. government does.
	I don't want that imputed to me.
	that i didn't vote for that and i don't i don't uh agree with that in any way shape or form and yet uh that is that is the big issue and so we need to understand the same thing about other people that's what i said from the very beginning you understand that um the things that are done by the israeli government to the israeli people using them as lab rats but also to the gaza people the That is not to be imputed to all the people living in Israel.
	The same thing goes of Hamas and the things that it does, not to be imputed to all the people living in Gaza, just as I don't want what Biden does or Trump does imputed to me.
	I mean, if that were the case, since we created this vaccine, I guess everybody would be justified in terms of wiping America off the face of the earth.
	Because we saw those shots around the world.
	I mean, it's crazy when you look at it.
	But we have to understand, you know, what's really going on.
	But everybody's getting their bloodlust up.
	You know, and I see they brought journalists over to Israel, and Joel Pollack at Breitbart was one of the ones that they took over to show, and he was just, you know, people were throwing up.
	When they showed them the pictures of what had been done to people.
	I understand that.
	And I wanted to throw up when I saw the pictures of what bombs had done to a little kid in Gaza.
	But you understand that it's not the visceral effect.
	We've got to... And try to distance ourselves from that somehow and say, how do we break this cycle of violence?
	How do we get a lid on this thing instead of escalating it?
	And everybody on both sides seems to want to escalate this, and they don't want to go back and look at the long-term agenda that we've had for decades with the U.S. and with Israel as well, with Netanyahu.
	We've got to get Iran. You know, that is, it's like, okay, so that's really what you're pushing us for.
	You've got this geopolitical goal, and you're going to use us as expendable for your geopolitical goal, and you don't care how many of your own citizens die, and you certainly don't care about the citizens in the other countries.
	As a matter of fact, you take that as a victory notch when you kill other people in other countries.
	Yeah, and you know, it's interesting.
	I look at it almost like a combination of pretzel logic and convoluted circus performing, where they have all these various convolutions, and they're very subtle.
	So, for example, the U.S. government will insert federal troops, U.S. troops, without any declaration of war, on the ground in Israel.
	They'll put them on the ground in Poland, And in Poland, Joe Biden actually acknowledges to the 101st Airborne.
	You'll find out about the Ukrainians.
	Oh, that's right. Some of you guys have already been there.
	Oh, really? I didn't know that you had them on the ground in Ukraine.
	Now you've told us.
	And then we have John Kirby talking about how, well, the advisors of the U.S. military, you know, they put it in air quotes, I suppose, the advisors of the U.S. military who are on the ground in Israel, they have a right to defend themselves.
	Even that is a circumlocution of what is really the rights.
	I've mentioned this to people before.
	I said, listen, do they really have a right to...
	Sure, they have the right to protect themselves, but if they're there illegitimately on somebody else's dime and the weapons that they have...
	If they didn't buy themselves, then what right exactly are they exercising over there?
	If a mafia sends one of its mob guys to a new city with guns that they got through shaking down some of the local people in Brooklyn, Mm-hmm.
	Or is there a moral question there?
	And I think there are major moral questions, even in that sort of typical phraseology that we hear from people where they say, well, they obviously have a right there.
	Well, you're not questioning the fact that you put them there illegitimately.
	And if we're looking at the weapons that they've got, what if I don't want to pay for their weapons?
	And that goes to the weapons, even if the people of the United States aren't there.
	If we're looking at the weapons that they send over.
	Well, take a look at Syria.
	Talk about justification.
	Okay, we could be invited into Israel, and I'm sure they would love to have additional troops in there to work with them.
	We were not invited into Syria.
	We invaded Syria.
	We set up bases in Syria.
	And then we had U.S. jets do attacks today, and they said they were retaliatory.
	Retaliatory for what?
	Retaliatory because we invaded, they attacked us in response to that, and so now, oh, now we're justified to escalate that.
	That is the key issue, and we have done that over and over again.
	And so when you look at what is happening, a seriously good example.
	They've got their agenda of what they want to do with oil.
	They've got their agenda of what they want to do with oil with Iran as well as with Iran's power base.
	And so this is about geopolitics.
	This is about the long-term animosity between Iran and the U.S. It goes back to the 1950s when we overthrew their elected leftist leader who wanted to nationalize industries.
	But, of course, in America, we just think it was...
	The Shah was always there.
	He wasn't put in by us.
	We don't know that the CIA was training his secret police, and we don't care or know anything about what he was doing to the people there.
	And then just all of a sudden, for no apparent reason, there's this radical Islamic regime that gets installed, and they hate Americans, and we can't understand why they hate us.
	Yeah, my formative years came without that knowledge of the foreground to all of it.
	So I came in with exactly those thoughts.
	I thought, why do they hate Americans?
	Why is it that they've done this?
	Oh, I must make sure that I don't like Iranians.
	Then I met a woman from Iran.
	She goes, well, you know, it used to be called Persian.
	I was like, what are you talking about?
	You know, I was a kid. And I was like, what?
	She goes, well, let me tell you what happened.
	And I'm like, oh, I see.
	Okay. And, you know, David, it's interesting you should mention it because they have all these subtle means to...
	You know, there are so many perverse incentives.
	Any time that a government institution or something removed from individuals claims power, so we've got the jabs, we've got the pharmakia, we've got the perverse incentives to gin the system And make sure that their money goes towards promoting a particular so-called public health agenda.
	And as you brought up, there is no such thing as public health, it's individual health.
	So anytime you remove it from the individual or free association and you're applying mandates and so on to people, there is an incentive for people to get in to have those mandates steer to their benefit.
	Obviously, rent seeking and economics, right?
	And we see the same thing with the military industrial complex, whether it's public health or so-called public defense.
	The further away – and the founders really understood this.
	They wanted small decentralized localities really running their own thing.
	And I think that, you know, the lessons from Exodus are very clear.
	If you look at before they had a king, you look at the system that they had, they had the tribes, they had the families, they had the elders in the families who were the adjudicators.
	It's much like ancient Ireland, much like ancient Iceland.
	They had these locales, localities, and it was mostly reputation.
	It wasn't statutes from the state thrown down at people.
	And I think that this is the sort of thing that a lot of people, they just sort of blithely go along with it because they think that they've got these protective machines in the government and the machines are just...
	They're designed to get taken over by people who will take advantage of them, whether it's the so-called defense industry or not.
	We've got a woman running for governor right now named Kelly Ayotte here in New Hampshire, former U.S. Senator.
	I used to see her around. She was the state attorney general.
	I used to see her in a Panera Bread up in the state capitol.
	She was a senator for a while.
	She got knocked out. She's part of the Rhino Complex.
	She was on the board of BAE Systems at the same time, I believe, that she was on the board of Fox News.
	Yeah, yeah. Big military industrial corporation.
	Yeah, exactly. So there are all these perverse incentives that we don't realize.
	And one thing I'd like to mention to you, David, to go back to what you were talking about, about the pharmakia and so on, For a number of years, it's taken me a while to learn this lesson, and I'm still trying to figure it out, but I think you and I discussed this once before.
	Having worked in television, I was at the Paramount Studios when I worked at Star Trek Voyager, and I really learned a lesson coming from television and here's that there's this fine line between consuming entertainment as a minor distraction and understanding that it is a distraction and living that entertainment world completely removed and it's a very strange thing because I
	think with the pervasive nature of media I was one of those people who I just, I thought, I live in New Hampshire, but I can go to Los Angeles, I can write, I can do all these things.
	And it took me a while to really understand that lesson, that entertainment is just a minor distraction.
	And You can't constantly live in escapism.
	And I really got the lesson just recently.
	I was watching one of the old reruns of Mission Impossible, and I knew that they had shot it.
	I didn't know until afterwards.
	I thought, you know, those look like the buildings.
	They were pretending it was like Poland or something like that, you know?
	But you could tell it was Los Angeles.
	Yeah. And they had Greg Morris and the guy, the big guy, they were setting up something in a van, some of the Mission Impossible members.
	It was from the 60s. Oh, yeah.
	And you know it's somewhere just around the corner from a soundstage or whatever now because I worked at Star Trek, right?
	And so I thought to myself, gee, I wonder if that's Paramount.
	And I looked at it more closely and I scrolled back and they pull into this alcove and it literally was an alcove that was just below my window at Paramount.
	And it's a weird thing because then you start to realize how many generations of people have gone through that particular field of work.
	And just, you know, they've gotten a contract, they're doing a show, like a guy doing a contract to build a house or lay down pavement or whatever it is, you know?
	It's a place where you can do work, people invested in putting up the buildings, people come and go, they do their work, they do their shows like any other theater.
	And as I've gotten older, I've become much more aware of how easily you can get drawn into considering that artificial world To be real.
	Yeah, yeah. And that's what we've got to be really careful about with virtual reality, because it's becoming hyper-real.
	Oh, yeah. And it's going to be so controlling to people.
	That's funny. Now, you were at the Paramount Studios in California, that's where you were?
	Yeah, yeah. And which Star Trek generation were you working with, was it?
	I was at Star Trek Voyager.
	Okay. Yeah. In fact, my claim to fame...
	I never got my name on the credits because I was always so low on the totem pole.
	But my claim to fame is that...
	And I hate to say this.
	I hate to say this because Donald Trump...
	It's Operation Warp Drive.
	But... Yeah, I don't have the hair.
	But I'm the guy who saved Warp Drive.
	So what happened was they had...
	This season of Star Trek Voyager...
	The premise for Voyager was that this crew of this Enterprise ship got teleported to some distant quadrant of the universe where nobody had ever gone, and it was going to take them years and years to get back.
	So they were having this adventure, a sort of lost in space sort of thing.
	They'd encounter new explorations as they worked their way back.
	And so they wanted to sort of speed things up.
	The time that they estimated at maximum warp drive to get back to the Federation space, it was going to be like six years.
	They're like, we're not sure if the show's going to last that long.
	Let's see if we can go faster.
	I'm glad you're not operating an EV. We've got to pause here and recharge at this planet.
	I see Jennifer Granholm is taking up all the spots.
	I don't know what's going on.
	They had this story where they had an alien who gave them this thing called slipstream drive.
	And again, this is how, you know, it's entertaining and it's kind of fun.
	It's sort of like talking about if you're a baseball card collector or, you know, oh, I got this first edition of the Rolling Stones record or whatever.
	You know, it's entertainment and it's fun.
	But then you got to realize, like...
	That's just a narrative, and it's just fun to talk about it.
	It's like talking about your favorite Jules Verne story or something like that.
	It's entertaining, and hopefully you can draw a lesson from it.
	That's really what I've been learning, as I mentioned with you before.
	I'm literally the Writers Guild Fellow.
	And I'm like nobody.
	I've been there for like two days.
	Nobody even knows who I am, right?
	And so I'm sitting there hearing them talk about, well, yeah, we've got this alien and it's going to be called Slipstream Drive and it's going to be so much faster than warp speed.
	I was like, well, at the end of this show, they're going to get back to the Federation.
	They're still going to have this technology.
	So that means like this classic thing, warp, is now going to be gone.
	They're going to get rid of it and they'll have this...
	So, I didn't know what to say because I wasn't really in a position to talk and say, ah, excuse me, you can't, you know, nobody knew who I was, right?
	So, at the end, I knew Brandon Baraga.
	He's the guy who created the Borg, and he's a pretty pro-Liberty guy.
	I had lunch with him a few years ago, nice guy.
	And, um... And so, Brandon, I went out, we left the meeting.
	It was all the writers are all together in this thing they call the break session.
	And I was up at the board.
	I was the guy who had to write down all their ideas as we broke it down into acts and scenes.
	So they're going through it, and And so I didn't mention anything during the meeting.
	But at the end of the meeting, I waited because I knew Brandon Braga would be the last guy to come out.
	So Brandon Braga comes out.
	He's one of the producers. And I say, hey, Brandon, that was a good meeting.
	He goes, yeah, yeah, what do you think?
	And I was like, yeah, that was good.
	I was like, oh, by the way, that flip stream drive thing.
	He goes, yeah. I was like, does that mean that when the ship gets back to the Federation, warp drive won't be used in Star Trek from now on?
	And he's like, Oh, we've got to fix that.
	They're like, yes, you do have to fix it.
	That sounds like Wag the Dog, you know?
	We've got this prisoner, we're going to bring him back.
	We can't have this guy come back.
	Let's kill old Shoe. The old shoe!
	People are throwing their shoes up.
	That was the funniest movie. Well, it's funny that both sides knew that this thing was just a made-up narrative, and so they're releasing information to change the narrative on the other side to their advantage as they're going through this made-up narrative.
	That was quite a movie.
	It was. It really was.
	It reminds me, when you're talking about that, I know we went out when the kids were, my sons were really small, we went out to Tahoe, and I had that feeling that it was really strange because, you know, I'd grown up with a bonanza, and it was in the background on Sunday nights and stuff like that, you know, and so I would see it, and we're driving around there, and it's like, wow, this sense of...
	I've been here before. It was really amazing.
	Of course, the kids didn't have it because they didn't know what it looked like, you know, but it was this area where they had filmed it and, you know, watched it for years and years when I was a kid, and then all of a sudden I'm there, and it was like being on the set, although they had been shooting it on the natural area.
	I understand. It is weird.
	I had a similar experience in another instance.
	My buddy, he was staying at one of my brother's houses and he had a dog.
	So when I would finish work, I would go over to visit with the dog and let the dog outside and he would leave the television on for the dog.
	And so I went in and typically when I got there, Bonanza would be on.
	And it was one of those old, you know, like first season Bonanzas, a black and white.
	It was mostly soundstage with the backdrop that had been drawn, you know, with the with the prairies in the background and so on.
	And I was watching.
	I was like, I don't know why, but I just get a feeling they shot this at one of the Paramount studios.
	I don't know why. Like, there's no reason to think that.
	It's just in a soundstage. And sure enough, it was shot at Paramount, probably in the same soundstage where I was walking around where they had built the Star Trek Voyager, you know, toy to play in.
	And it really is...
	Well, you know, the interesting thing about it was the first couple of seasons they shot it on a soundstage, but then they would do some outside shots in that area.
	And then they decided, well, let's build the real thing out there.
	And, you know, they built a purpose-built house.
	And eventually, Lauren Green and...
	Dan Blocker and Michael Landon all got involved in terms of a part ownership of this thing.
	They set it up for tourists and stuff like that.
	But they actually did have a Ponderosa that they built, physically built it, and they built in different areas where they could hide the camera.
	You know, already got the shots that are built into this actual building.
	But because they had been shooting it on the soundstage for a couple of years, they had to put the same background up so they had to...
	Kind of like a soundstage behind the actual Ponderosa that they built for continuity effect.
	I don't know if anybody would have really noticed it, but they did it anyway.
	Oh, wow. I guess life imitating art or something like that.
	But yeah, you're right. It really is about moderation.
	Just because somebody is not going to become an alcoholic if they take a drink, if they can do it in moderation.
	And so everything is about that.
	Entertainment can be that way.
	Food can be that way. Everything needs to be in moderation.
	That's the real challenge to all of us.
	And we all have a different challenge and different things.
	And... And of course, on the other side of it, even when we're talking about food, we have people who are trying to manipulate us into not doing it in moderation.
	You know, junk food suppliers, they load that stuff up so that you don't do it in moderation.
	You know, it keeps you unsatisfied and looking for more.
	I was thinking about the lessons of the pharmakia, not to actually cure problems and cure maladies, but to give you things that cover up the maladies and then extend the maladies.
	I'm beginning to think that it's not just what party or what nation-state is going to win here or win there.
	I'm almost getting the sense that These decades and decades since World War II of all of these different flare-ups here and there, it's almost as if the military-industrial complex knows they want to continue to push conflict, but only up to a certain point.
	Because If they go beyond that point, then they have to literally, you know, they would get lots of production and so on and so forth, but they reach a threshold where the economy would be so bad off that I think almost as if they've realized that they can sustain themselves at the maximum point.
	And this is just my theory.
	I was thinking about it last night.
	I was like, I wonder if they know that if they just continually to have things simmer just below World War, that that's their best profit market.
	margin right there you know and i don't know i mean i could be completely wrong but you know you see the way things are bubbling up there in the middle east oh hezbollah is going to get involved and then attack iran and that sort of stuff and it could lead to world war three perhaps or maybe they'll pull back and then a few years from now well they'll do it again
	and of course we got to have more increasing uh money going to the military industrial complex and perpetuate those bases rather than having a complete world war that ends up you know removing all the chess pieces around once more They just keep their chess pieces on there rather than having everything removed.
	They slowly advance into our lives.
	I don't know. It's just speculation. Yeah.
	Yeah, and of course, that all comes from the standpoint of their arrogance that they are in complete control.
	Yeah. And they aren't. You know, they might get right up to that line, and then things get a little bit out of control.
	You know, we were talking about it the other day, and one person questioned it.
	I said, you know, it looks like we're at DEFCON 2.
	There isn't any – there's not a public description of that.
	Most people agree that after the – Involvement in Ukraine, it took us to DEFCON 3.
	DEFCON 2 is the next level up.
	I don't know if what's going on in the Middle East takes us to DEFCON level 2 or not, but if there's a general consensus that we were at DEFCON 3 with what was going on with Ukraine, this whole Middle East thing looks like it is quite a bit more volatile and dangerous from a global perspective, I think. I agree with you.
	And you might have heard, I think, the cat agrees with you, too.
	She's just entered the studio.
	I agree with you.
	And it troubles me greatly to see the way that You can't criticize the policies of the State of Israel without being accused of being anti-Semitic.
	You can't criticize the United States government overthrow of the Ukrainian government that was elected there in late 2013 and then the imposition through Victoria Nuland and Jeffrey Pyatt and all the others.
	And it amazes me that you've got these fatuous characters like Lindsey Graham, I think?
	Please, come on.
	It's amazing. You've got Amy Klobuchar in photographs with him, Joe Biden shaking his hand, John McCain not only meeting with guys who formed the Al Nusra Front when they were in Turkey, they've got those photographs of them standing out there on a bright, clear day out there in the desert, but you've got him in photographs with Tiani Bak.
	It's just amazing You know And The thing that I often consider David Is you know they say that This is for our defense and so on I would prefer that They actually operate According to their oath to the constitution If they think there's the cat Sorry the cat is very eager It's warm here she wants to go outside
	So Anyway You know I'd rather rather than coming up With all these flimsy excuses that they're Defending America and that if they Don't continue to give weapons to Israel Israel will somehow fall When they've been giving them $3.8 billion of weapons a year for years, I'd rather just be disconnected and protect myself.
	You talked a little bit about that story out of Maine.
	It's not that far from my home.
	And when I look at the forces of government on a regional level in the United States or state level in the United States, and I think about what they do to disarm us and make us more vulnerable here against criminals, It blows me away.
	I've got even conservatives now on talk radio here are saying, first they're saying, well, you know, they seem to think that everybody in Maine is carrying a weapon, right?
	Which is absurd, right?
	With Governor Janet Mills there, they've got a lot of people who moved up there, especially from Massachusetts.
	It's not old-time Maine.
	Yeah, there's a lot of wilderness there, but if you go to a lot of the cities, they've gone very purple.
	The other thing about it is that the place where that man committed his murders, and alleged, but the people died, this particular man is alleged to have committed these murders, was a bowling alley and a bar.
	And The bowling alley serves beer.
	I looked up their website.
	Maine has a statute that prohibits anyone who owns a bar or any place that's serving alcohol from allowing anybody into their premises to carry a firearm.
	That's an infringement on property rights and it's an infringement on the freedom of contract and it's an infringement on the right to keep and bear arms in all those areas.
	So this guy picked soft targets.
	And no one had firearms there.
	So that's the first lesson.
	Then the second lesson is I'm hearing conservatives actually insinuating that, well, this man had mental stability problems.
	He threatened people on the military base.
	So why wasn't somebody taking away his firearms?
	You're a conservative?
	Now you're talking like Donald Trump.
	And we do the due process later, which isn't due process at all.
	Now you're actually saying without the terminology, red flag the guy.
	How about this?
	If he threatened people, you charge him with criminal threatening.
	And then you put him in jail.
	And you have a trial about that, and you say, so did he threaten people?
	What's his motivation for that?
	Oh, he's crazy also? Okay, well, we'll deal with that as well.
	Yeah, exactly. You give in due process.
	And so just like with hate crimes, I'm hearing conservatives now, especially in New England because it's so close to home, people are talking about how, well, something's got to be done.
	Well, if something had to be done, clearly there was a problem with the guy.
	If there was a problem with the guy, he's either bad enough to be put in jail and you can prosecute him or he's not.
	That's it.
	You put him on trial.
	And if you don't have him in jail, then clearly you think he's safe enough to be out on the streets.
	Yeah.
	And of course, you know, besides the alcohol being there and it's not legal for them to take it, they had a sign at the bowling alley, you know, right above the sign that says, choose your weapon.
	They said, don't bring your firearm in.
	Yeah. And it's like, choose your weapon.
	You want a small bowling ball?
	You want a big bowling ball?
	Or you want to...
	A small caliber or a big caliber?
	But don't bring your weapon in here.
	And so, again, as you point out, it's a soft target.
	And that sign didn't stop anything, did it?
	I mean, that's the key.
	What they did was they kept people who were law-abiding, rational citizens from having weapons that they could use to protect themselves.
	It's just like the Luby Cafeteria in Texas.
	And... And what happened with that woman who was a dentist, and she left her, you know, said, well, you can't bring it in here.
	It's like, all right, left her firearm in the glove compartment, and then this guy drives his truck through the side of the building there and starts shooting people.
	And she's, oh, I don't have my weapon with me, because there was a sign there telling me I couldn't protect myself.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	It's troubling, and thank goodness we can talk about these things and try to set the record straight, and I think that With your program, you have tremendous, tremendous capacity to be able to cover all these different stories.
	My work at MRCTV, I throw stories up to the editors and things like that.
	Sometimes we have disagreements.
	The folks at MRCTV, Brent Bozell and Mark Levin are very good friends.
	I have massive problems with many of Mark Levin's positions, especially some of his rhetoric and so on.
	But they're very good to allow me.
	I mentioned in a recent piece about Joe Biden throwing weapons around the world at the same time that he's starting a new White House Bureau of Gun Violence Prevention.
	I was like, the hypocrisy of this guy is unbelievable.
	He wants to give billions of dollars in weapons to Ukraine, and they did allow me to hyperlink to Israel in my piece.
	So I thought, okay, you know...
	There's give and take here, and I'm very glad to be able to chat with you and the opportunities you've given me to fill in for you and then doing my streaming show to get this information out that even when you have some conservatives, you say, no, we've got to disagree here.
	Let me bring up a different perspective for you.
	I heard one of my acquaintances in Boston Talk Radio, she says, what are we going to do about Yeah.
	Yeah. Yeah. Some of the censors that have been brought up against us.
	And with the listenership and how supportive they've been, I've been able to start off my Liberty Conspiracy show and my Substack, and I've been able to sustain it pretty well with all the people who came over from your show.
	And they're in my chat.
	And they're saying, Hi, Gardner!
	I'm like, Wow, you folks are just great!
	It's so fantastic!
	And you're there, Liberty Conspiracy, on Rockfin, Monday through Friday at what time?
	Monday through Friday, starting at 6 p.m.
	Eastern. And we're streaming live at Rumble and Rockfin, and on my Twitter feed, at Guard Goldsmith.
	And in addition to that, I have the Substack, and I'm taking little video pieces, and I'll put them out at Substack, and so on and so forth.
	The latest one was about Halloween.
	There's a second part about that coming out.
	And I just got asked, and this is something I want to mention to you, David.
	I just got asked...
	You know how Ian Freeman was convicted, and he's going to be appealing the conviction, but yeah, he's going to be going to the federal prison.
	Tell people Ian Freeman, they may not be familiar with the name, because it hasn't been covered by the mainstream media much, but it's an important precedent that's being set there.
	Tell people about Ian Freeman.
	Well, Ian Freeman and his business partner, Mark Edge, came up from Florida with the Free State Project to join fellow Libertarians.
	They moved to Keene, New Hampshire, and they started their radio show decades ago in New Hampshire.
	And I was doing a separate radio show in New Hampshire, and they were so kind.
	They invited me over. They said, hey, how would you like to sit in with us on Wednesday nights?
	And I said, sure. So I would go and sit in with them, and terrific people.
	And Ian got started very early in Bitcoin.
	And made amazing profits off it and started his own Bitcoin exchange and also got some of the Bitcoin kiosks for people locally, other FreeState Project members who might want to start their own.
	Ian was prosecuted because he was dealing with a guy who wanted crypto and that guy was defrauding people.
	And they said that Ian wasn't looking closely enough into a sort of know-your-customer type pattern.
	Which they're now putting on steroids.
	They've ramped this up.
	They've got 300 pages of regulations.
	Congress said, we want you to do it, but of course the devil's going to be in the details, and the details are going to be created by the regulatory state.
	And the IRS has got huge, 300 pages to basically end anonymity for anybody that's got crypto in any way, shape, or form, but also exposing people to a lot of identity theft risk because it is so pervasive and broad-based.
	And it also is set up as, I think it's one of the reasons they came after Ian, Was because they said, well, it's kind of this vague thing as to whether or not you're able to get this.
	If you have the ability to get all this information on people, then you've got to do it.
	And it's like, well, that's kind of vague.
	And so to have that case there with Ian Freeman said, well, if you don't collect this information, we may at some point in time determine that you were able, and now we're going to give you the Ian Freeman treatment.
	Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. Absolutely.
	And that's one of the ways...
	You know, the appeal is going to be very complex.
	There's some question as to whether or not Bitcoin is a security or a currency.
	So whether it's the SEC, it's all confused.
	And it's all based... Again, it's how many angels can dance on the head of a deadly pin.
	The pin shouldn't exist.
	The federal government should have nothing, absolutely nothing to do with this.
	And... And agents of the state.
	If people want to police this, then let them go ahead and invest in something to police it.
	First, getting the state involved means that they're forcing their neighbor to pay for what they think should be necessary enforcement of something.
	That's immoral, period.
	There's nothing that excuses that.
	And so Ian has to...
	Looks like he has to go to federal prison for eight years.
	Right now he's in a state penitentiary and he can make phone calls and so on.
	And so I've gotten a number of phone calls from him.
	Literally, he's in his cell.
	You can hear it echoing. And he's talking to me on a tablet.
	He called yesterday.
	And he has asked me on Friday nights now.
	So their Free Talk Live show goes seven days a week.
	And he asked me if, on Friday nights, I can provide recorded segments that will go out on the stations that they've connected to, to lever preposition dangling.
	That's 175 stations.
	And, yeah, I guess they're on the GCN network.
	So, yeah, so...
	You know, our interviews, when you want to hop on, when Tony Arterburn wants to hop on, it just had Eric Peters.
	Yeah, and so, yeah, it'll go out.
	I think, you know, it's up to me.
	They're going to be recorded. It won't be live.
	But it is because of you helping to keep me in the game.
	Not game, but in this line of work, in addition to MRCTV, that I've been able to do these little pieces here and there to just get these messages out there, to get around these censorious minds.
	Well, you keep yourself in the game because you keep yourself informed, and I know you work really hard to do that.
	And that's the key thing.
	You have a lot of information.
	People subscribe to your Substack.
	You put out a thing every Sunday night and pick up some key stories.
	And you have a really good sense of a broad base of stories.
	It's not a repetition of what you typically see or even what I have here.
	It's things that you found on your own doing a lot of research.
	So I highly recommend your Substack to people as well.
	Thanks, David. And, you know, one of the things that really gets me is when you know you've got allies, not to stress this too much, but when you know you've got allies who are helping you out and who believe in the principles that you believe in, that's the main thing, is the principles that you believe in.
	And what really amazes me is when I think about the forces that are arrayed against us, and you brought up News Guard, and I gave a comment, and you're like, oh, he's the News Guard, you know?
	Mm-hmm. And we've got Michael Hayden on the board of NewsGuard, a man who openly admits to overthrowing people, to being involved with spying, lying, this sort of thing.
	It's just incredible to think about the fact that they were getting my tax money They were sending MRCTV messages to say, okay, have Gardner Goldsmith respond to us about this article.
	If you don't respond to us, we're going to claim that it's false.
	All they have to do is click on the hyperlinks that are in my articles, and they'll get the information.
	Okay. It's amazing how many tentacles they've got.
	I saw something about Sidney Powell, who is now flipped, and, well, we don't know if she's flipped or not.
	Maybe she flipped a long time ago, but she was getting, you know, even after she said, you know, pleaded guilty of this, she came back out and still pushing her narrative about the election.
	And I noticed in one article...
	There was a guy that she relied on.
	There was a former CIA guy.
	And it's like, they've got their tentacles and everything pushing these.
	Is it kind of like what Pacinic did with the sting?
	This guy's pushing stuff to Sidney Powell?
	Maybe she believed it.
	I don't know. But, you know, they've got their stuff there.
	You talk about Michael Hayden. These are the guys who created the Ayatollah Khomeini as blowback, as Ron Paul always talks about.
	You know, they're constantly doing coups and assassinations, censorship, fake narratives, and it's just amazing how destructive and evil they are and how they're everywhere.
	You know, it's not just, you know, Operation Mockingbird where they're feeding stuff to Walter Cronkite or whatever.
	They're everywhere. They're pushing this stuff to everybody at every level, even in alternative media, even to somebody like Sidney Powell pushing stuff to her.
	So true. So true.
	And it's funny, David, because I can get frustrated and, you know, you get angry sometimes when, or one gets angry sometimes.
	I do, too. Yeah, you know, okay.
	I do, yeah.
	Yeah, and the other thing about it is, you know, working in this field, I think a lot of times, especially I'll listen to a talk radio host in the morning, or you get a Michael Savage who sort of toned things down.
	But, you know, a lot of times bluster and expression of visceral anger can gin up better ratings sometimes.
	Or, you know, sometimes maybe people feel like they have to emote that much more, that sort of thing.
	And you don't want to be too manipulative and too self analytic and things like that.
	You just want to be yourself.
	Sometimes you naturally will get angry.
	But I get so tired of this shrill, you know, like Mark Levin, I get so tired of these people who.
	oftentimes, if you were to sit down and conversation with them, you might agree on a number of things.
	And this is the problem that I see so often in politics and commentary about politics where there's this fine line between attack, attack, attack and I'd rather win over somebody.
	And I don't know where that line is many times, you know, to say, look, this person is an enemy, you know, versus how can I win this person over?
	Well, I think people want to see conflict.
	And I think that, you know, Trump understands that.
	The Democrats understand it.
	You know, James Carville said, well, they're going to impeach Trump.
	How do we get this lucky?
	Trump thrives on this persecution.
	And it is persecuted. Everybody sees that it's unequal application of the law.
	And he thrives on it.
	And he invites it. You know, we just look at what he's doing.
	The judge says, don't say anything about me.
	He gets a $10,000 fine and immediately does it again on Truth Social.
	$10,000 is nothing to him.
	You'll make a lot more than that with donations if everybody gets angry.
	And so that's a key part of it, is getting everybody on both sides of this angry.
	That's why I said even when you look at something as horrific as the...
	The deliberate mutilation by these terrorists of children, killing them, and or the kid with half of his brain blown out of his skull from a bomb or whatever.
	You can get yourself to the point where you can fall into the trap of getting so emotionally involved in it And, you know, we should be emotionally involved.
	We shouldn't be so, you know, cold to all this stuff.
	But we have to also try to keep our head and say, well, how do we – this is awful.
	How do we try to minimize this, right?
	Instead of just running off with a bloody shirt and, you know, I'm going to get even.
	I'm going to get vengeance for this or whatever.
	We have to try to pull back and say, all right, but how do – is there anything that we can do to try to minimize this?
	I don't really see any good decisions there of what we do about this stuff, frankly, but I know that, you know, if we just get ourselves ramped up and psyched up to kill the other side, whichever side we're on, that is definitely going to be the wrong way to go.
	David, I'm curious, you know, as a father who you and your wife raise children, you know, I've only experienced it as an uncle, but How you go about, how you went about that balance between showing the kids the dangerous, the malicious people out there and not getting...
	Too wrapped up in that attack mode.
	Because you want to teach people, youngsters, look, that's bad.
	That behavior is bad.
	And how you make sure that they don't get cynical, they don't get jaded as you're giving them these examples.
	Because there are so many examples throughout history.
	I'm sure a lot of that has to do with faith in God, I would assume.
	But, you know, I don't know if I'm expressing it right, Dave, but I was just thinking about it as I was watching you.
	And I thought, gee, you know, you've raised kids, you've done such a great job as a father and your wife, as a mother.
	And I think to myself, you know, to allow the children to see the dark side and not become cynical, to know, hey, watch out, this is bad stuff.
	Well, you know, I don't know.
	It is difficult to not become cynical, but I think another part of it is that we have to focus on positive things.
	And if all we do is look at negative things, this is one of the reasons why when I go through the news, I really do feel compelled to get preachy, as Keith called it.
	I feel like I've got to give people some good news and some good hope.
	And there really is a good hope out there.
	And it's not all doom and gloom.
	So there's evil, but we don't have desperation.
	And all around us there's darkness and evil, but we don't have to be overcome by that.
	And so we overcome evil with good.
	And one of the ways that we do that is by focusing on what is good and pure and right and just.
	And that is a real healing thing to us, better than any psilocybin mushrooms or anything else, is to look at what is true and just and eternal.
	And we have to focus on that.
	And that's why, you know, when I talk about this stuff, and I have to do it for my own benefit, because I can't look at this abyss on a day-to-day basis as much as I do.
	And, you know, it would...
	It would just drive me nuts if I didn't have something that was good and pure to look at.
	And so I don't want to leave people without anything, any good news, when we look at all this bad news.
	That's the key thing.
	That's well stated.
	You know, it's funny, David...
	We have some neighbors who moved into this area before my family did, about a year before.
	They had an old farmhouse named the Driscolls.
	They had three kids, born before I, And they were more my brother and sister's age.
	My sister's five years my elder, my brother's seven years my elder.
	And you make me think about, I went to visit Mr.
	and Mrs. Driscoll recently, and they were always just wonderful hosts.
	They were just great. You'd go over, we'd be playing baseball in a little field that they had that no longer had crops on it and most of it, but we'd be playing softball or whatever and going sledding down the hill and that sort of stuff.
	And Mr. Driscoll actually did cartooning for NASA during the Apollo mission.
	He was part of their PR team and stuff.
	Very, very good artist.
	And he brought out drawings that he had done of us as kids playing baseball.
	Little spoofy cartoons with the dog running away with the ball and things like that.
	And he had been in the military.
	I mean, he was in his 90s.
	He was in Korea. And you think about some of the terrible things that those people saw.
	My dad was in World War II. He saw a man burn to death, an Australian pilot burn to death inside his plane on the tarmac.
	And my dad went to try to get him out.
	My dad was burning his hands.
	He couldn't get the cockpit open.
	And you think about some of these terrible things that people see, and yet they find a positive.
	And it's through, well, I would hope that it's through their soul, recognizing who is there behind it all.
	And just a little while ago, so I went to visit the Driscoll's, and it was like a second hadn't gone by.
	And I was in their house and enjoying the smells, in a sense, walking across that doorstep that I'd walked across so many times as a kid.
	And I saw Mr.
	Driscoll. He was going to be going in for heart surgery.
	And so he did, and he got out.
	But unfortunately, he passed away just a few weeks ago.
	So we were at the memorial service, and I was on Saturday.
	I thought about how when they found out that there was a new house that was built just through the woods behind their house, Mr.
	Driscoll got a lawnmower and he cut away branches and stuff and he created a path so that we could walk over to their house because he knew there were going to be kids there.
	And he maintained it, and then eventually our footsteps maintained it.
	And there were other friends beyond that, five kids.
	We had gangs of kids, just so much fun, you know?
	Flashlight tag and all sorts of stuff.
	And so we were out there at their Methodist church, and I got up to say something at the memorial Saturday.
	They asked if anybody would like to come up.
	And I said, you know, Mr.
	Driscoll had an artistic eye.
	And somehow he could see that landscape in the woods, and he could see a trail.
	I was like, but he saw a greater trail.
	He saw a trail that was given to us by Christ.
	And it just made me think about that if you can just see that trail, you're on the path, you know?
	And it's okay.
	So, anyway. Well, what a great story that is.
	Before we run out of time, I know that you are a writer as well, and you've got a book that is coming up.
	Has it been published yet, or is it still coming up?
	Well, yeah, interestingly enough, as we come towards Halloween, so I have three novellas that are out.
	One is called Bite, and that's about a vampire hunter in Las Vegas.
	It's sort of a cold check, the Night Stalker takeoff.
	Then there's Wall, which is crypto-archaeology about a Great Wall of China, 10,000 years before the Great Wall of China.
	and there's another one called Fishing, and that's a dark mass murderer on the loose in Western Massachusetts in the 70s, just around the end of the hippie era, and that's got a lot of dark stuff in it, so if people want to be careful, and there's some violent scenes in that, but the so if people want to be careful, and there's some violent scenes in It has been done for ages.
	And I actually had a book contract.
	That was the one where it was actually Samhain Publishing, as some people might call it.
	So as we come to Halloween, it's appropriate.
	And it was a mid-sized publishing company, but they wanted me to split my writing name from my political name.
	And I said, why would I do that?
	I'm not going to do that. So I declined the contract.
	And it has not been published.
	So there's that, which is the sequel to Byte, the novella.
	And then I have this other one called Teamizer, which actually started in 1984 when I was a student at Boston University.
	I came up with this idea...
	That the T was an evil, underground, dystopian empire.
	And it had gas that was making people ride to the end of the line.
	Sort of like, you will ride forever beneath the streets of Boston.
	He's the man who never returned.
	You know, Charlie, the guy.
	And their cards are actually, their T cards, their passes are called Charlie cards.
	I'm like, I don't want one of those!
	Am I ever getting off this thing?
	Kingston Trio, yeah.
	Yeah, Kingston Trio. So that's called Teamizer, and it happens in 1988, and Mike Dukakis is a dystopian bad guy who's trying to take over the planet by getting everybody out of their regular cars and out of public transportation.
	And I came up with it.
	I didn't have the idea for, like, you know how they had cash for clunkers, right?
	Well, I had that concept in there in 1988.
	I started writing this novel in 1988, the T-Mizer novel.
	And he's called T-Mizer like Heat Mizer and Snow Mizer.
	They Mizer their tokens.
	They won't pay their tokens because they have fingerprints on them and they track them.
	So I had this idea that, yeah, they will give everybody...
	A pass for the public transit because he wants everybody on public transit.
	It's infused with gas and hypnotizes everybody to love the government.
	And they'll have people trade in their gas-guzzling, carbon-emission cars for these public transit things.
	And I was thinking about that in 1988, right?
	But they didn't have a title for it.
	Way ahead of your time.
	That's great. Oh yeah, it was nuts.
	And so when they had the cash for clunkers, I came up, I wrote after the fact, I went back in and call it T for Trashers, the T pass, the Boston T pass.
	It's T for Trashers.
	So the guy comes back, yeah, the main character comes back from vacation and his girlfriend has sold his car.
	He's like, I gotta get to work!
	Where's my car?
	She's like, I sold it, man.
	You got a T pass.
	He's like, Yeah, that's where we're headed for sure.
	We're almost out of time.
	Tell everybody where they can find you.
	And again, I would also recommend people to go to thenightsofthestorm.com and they'll see schedules for Guard for this show for many shows as well as their many shows.
	But tell people where they can find you again, Guard.
	Okay, yeah, well, first thing I'll say and mention again, it looks like tonight I will, tonight I'll be going live at Liberty Conspiracy, as I do every Monday through Friday, starting at 6, on Rumble and Rockfin, and on my Twitter feed, at GARD Goldsmith, G-A-R-D Goldsmith, not NewsGuard, thank goodness.
	Yes, and no Michael Hayden behind me, that's for sure, although we're both bald.
	So, 6 o'clock Monday through Friday, Rockfin and Rumble for Liberty Conspiracy, and also my Substack, Gardner Goldsmith Substack.
	Then, I should know by 6 o'clock tonight, if the Free Talk Live stuff goes out there, that'll be on all GCN network-affiliated stations, as long as they pick it up at 7 o'clock tonight.
	And I have to say, before we close off, I've got to say thank you to a couple people who left tips.
	Thank you, Sean E., very much for the tip on Rockfin and on Rumble.
	Chris M90, thank you.
	And thank you to all of you.
	As a matter of fact, I had a list that I wanted to read to people, read off the names of people who have contributed to us on Zelle.
	I'll do that on Monday because we're out of time, but I just want to thank you all.
	Thank you for the support this month.
	We are donor-supported.
	That is the bulk of what happens with this, especially since the advertising thing with Pride Month.
	So thank you so much for the support.
	And I'll get those names.
	I'll read those out on Monday.
	Thank you all. Have a great weekend.
	And thank you, Gard. Appreciate it.
	Thank you. Thank you, David.
	Bye-bye. The Common Man.
	They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.

▲