All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 26, 2023 - The David Knight Show
03:00:47
The David Knight Show - 10/26/2023
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
Using free speech to free minds.
Music.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 26th of October, your Rolored 2023.
Day 3.
Well, today we're going to begin by taking a look at the new speaker who suddenly got put in.
He was nominated and on right away.
I guess he got tired of doing this over and over again.
But there appears that he's got a very clear agenda about what he wants to do with war and peace.
It's a complicated issue in terms of evaluating his past.
There's both good and bad, and we'll talk about both of those when we come back.
Stay with us.
Stay with us.
Stay with us.
And we've had a very disturbing episode involving magic mushrooms.
We'll also be talking about the revelations, the continuing revelations, about Pfizer's foreknowledge about what this jab was going to do to people.
I've talked for the longest time.
It's surprising to me that people still have not picked up much on what happened in South America, but what happened in South Africa, they have picked up on.
And we have documentary evidence about what is happening there.
But let's begin with the speaker. Mike Johnson sworn in as a new House Speaker.
Been going around in circles for three weeks.
Congress has effectively been shut down.
So the new American says, so what do we know about the new speaker?
Not a whole lot. He hasn't run any committees, anything like that.
I think this is his fourth term in Congress.
But we do know some things about him.
As the New American points out, he's got a Freedom Index score of 72%, which is their evaluation score.
And if you listen to me and you agree with me, I pretty much agree with their evaluation of people.
They said it's well above Kevin McCarthy, or Steve Scalise, but behind Jim Jordan.
They said, however, his consistent weakness for interventionist foreign policy is his Achilles heel.
And that was evident right at the very beginning.
Very first thing he did, and we'll talk about that in a moment.
But before we get to his first action...
They said he's voted more than once to continue funding the U.S. occupation of Syria.
Now, he comes across as a very articulate Christian and supporter of the Constitution.
Where is the constitutional or Christian justification for our occupation of Syria?
Very troubling contradiction.
And, of course, we all have contradictions in our life.
This is a major contradiction.
Not just Achilles' heel, but it is the elephant in the room, quite frankly, with him.
Especially at this time.
He's voted in favor of or avoided voting on more than one House resolution supporting NATO. He even voted in June of 2021.
And, of course, the New American, and also I, do not support NATO. Ha!
He even voted in June 2021 to establish the Trans-Sahara Counter-Terrorism Partnership Program, a new entangling alliance with a host of Saharan countries to share intelligence on terrorism.
Maybe we're starting to get an idea as to why he was so quickly put in place.
I mean, you have to be on board with the deep state.
You have to be on board with military industrial corporations and the complex and the intelligence community and the war community.
And it appears that he fits in quite comfortably there.
His vote in 2021 to make Juneteenth a federal holiday, he has had, as I point out, some rhino leanings.
He does support critical race theory as well.
So he's been identified as an arch-conservative by the mainstream media.
However, he has some very troubling positions on some things for a so-called constitutional Christian conservative.
Again, supporting critical race theory, not just the Juneteenth holiday.
He has, however, been solid on social issues such as abortion.
One of the reasons that the mainstream media is so concerned about him was because he was such a staunch Trump supporter.
And so when he had his first public appearance as speaker, you had ABC News reporter Rachel Scott start the questioning by aggressively asking him about his involvement in overturning you had ABC News reporter Rachel Scott start the questioning by aggressively asking him
And this I thought was very interesting, I guess kind of personally interesting, because you'll see him standing there and to his left is Lauren Boebert.
And to her left is Virginia Fox.
Virginia Fox is a congresswoman from North Carolina.
She got elected in the 1994 Contract with America sweep that Newt Gingrich put together.
She was the one that I ran against when I ran for Congress in 1996.
But she's been there ever since 1994.
And she's the one who's showing shut up, shut up.
Mr. Johnson, you helped leave the efforts to overthrow the 2020 election results.
Oh, God.
Next question.
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah, that was kind of her response when we said, do you want to debate?
Shut up!
Shut up! She did not show up at the debate.
She had been in one term and she wasn't going to debate anybody.
So that was...
There was another third party candidate in me and the Democrat and PBS ran a debate on that, but she said shut up.
Well, it turns out that even though he is a Trump supporter, he is not America first.
He is Israel first.
Made that very clear. It's his first priority is Israel.
And, you know, America comes distant second.
Extraordinary crisis right now.
And the world needs us to be strong.
They need us to remember our creed and our admonition.
Turmoil and violence have rocked the Middle East and Eastern Europe.
We all know it, and tensions continue to build in the Indo-Pacific.
The country demands strong leadership of this body, and we must not waver.
Our nation's greatest ally in the Middle East is under attack.
The first bill that I'm going to bring to this floor in just a little while will be in support of our dear friend Israel, and we're overdue in getting that done.
Nearly unanimous support for that as well.
We're going to ship not only Israel, but the entire world, that the barbarism of Hamas that we have all seen play out on our television screens is wretched and wrong, and we are going to stand for the good in that conflict.
Well, as usual, Thomas Massey got it right.
There were 10 people who voted against this resolution, and more than 400 who voted for it.
Ten people who voted against it, nine Democrats, you know, the squad, the usual suspects, and the PLO part of Congress.
But Thomas Massey is not a supporter of the PLO. And he said, look, I think we ought to make a declaration about the barbarism and how we don't support terrorism as a war tactic.
But he said there's a lot of disturbing things in this, sanctions and other things.
And I'll read his statement here in a moment.
But he got it exactly right.
He says, I'm not going to sign this when there's things in here that I don't agree with.
So as a result, he risks being tagged as anti-Semitic because he doesn't want to send America to war for another nation.
Now, you could look at this and say that Mike Johnson, he's a, again, as I said, a very, he seems to be a very strong Christian in terms of his personal life and a lot of the issues that he's done.
He has taught periodically at Liberty University and other things like that.
When I first looked at it, I thought, well, maybe he's like so many Christians that I've seen who, because of their eschatology, they want to make it happen.
And so they will give to the government of Israel, which I see is very different from the Jewish people, very different from what God sees as Israel as well.
But they want to give them carte blanche.
They will support them with anything.
And so I thought, well, maybe that's perhaps where he's coming from.
But he is also, there may be some other issues just besides his eschatology.
His top donor is AIPAC, the American-Israeli Political Action Committee.
They've given more money to him than anybody else.
When I saw that speech yesterday, I said, okay, well, if you're going to come down hard on Israel's side, because I knew it wasn't just about condemning the brutality of Hamas, which has to be condemned.
But I said, is there going to be a formal declaration of war this time?
You know, are you just going to inject people there secretly like you did in Syria?
And he supported that in Syria.
Maybe we'll just go to war with these people like we do elsewhere.
We'll send troops in. We won't tell anybody.
We're not even going to have a discussion about whether this is in our interests or not because our interests are subordinate to a foreign country's interests.
And so, you know, again, his number one donor is APAC. He, again, is also a believer in critical race theory, white privilege.
He wants a systematic change, he said, and transformative solutions to systemic racism.
That is not a position that I see most Christians taking.
Because the Christian position is that we don't judge people by races.
We look at the content of their character, not the color of their skin.
And to look at the color of their skin is a recipe for more division, more unrest, more injustice, and the rest of this stuff.
As a Christian, that is the one thing that should be very obvious to Christians.
That we are all of one blood.
Yes, we have different nations, different tongues, different tribes.
Or if you want to put it in the vernacular, that's the way the Bible describes it.
Savage, Michael Savage says, borders, languages, and culture.
But that's the same thing.
Nations, tongues, and tribes.
But to divide us along race lines?
No, no. He said that he believes that white people have an easier path in life than black people because of the color of their skin.
We need systematic change and transformative solutions.
So again, as I said, he's a very mixed bag.
Very inconsistent, apparently, in what he believes.
So the House approved that resolution.
Is it a declaration of war?
Maybe as much as we will get.
The legislation that he introduced, again, this happened very quickly.
He gets nominated, and immediately they hold a vote, and it's overwhelming.
He gets in, okay? And then he says, first thing I'm going to do is introduce this resolution about Israel.
It's four pages long.
I think this thing, considering how quickly...
He gets put into the speaker thing.
This is probably already written, don't you think?
So the question is, who wrote it?
When did they write it?
So the House approved the resolution in 412 to 10 to 6, 6 abstentions.
10 people voted against it.
Again, It was the usual squad and anti-Israel people who voted against it, except nine of those people, and then Thomas Massey, who had, I think, the only correct position out of everybody in the House.
And that wouldn't be the first time either.
He was the only person to vote against Trump's massive $3.7 trillion vote.
Boondoggle that set us on the path to economic destruction and bankruptcy.
And he stood the wrath of Trump because he demanded that everybody come back and go on record as to what they're going to do.
He said, this is a big deal. Oh, we can't come back.
There's this pandemic. He's like, yeah, right.
You know, we'd already had this little rodeo where they had CPAC, the Conservative Political Action Committee.
And the left, I remember when it happened, the left said, oh, this is great.
Somebody tested positive that was there, and this is just going to destroy and kill all of the conservatives.
They're all going to die from the pandemic.
Not a single person got sick.
You had people like Ted Cruz and Rand Paul who stayed home or whatever, but nobody got sick, and it was no big deal.
And then they just dropped it and continued pushing the idea that there was a pandemic.
If there was a pandemic, all the conservatives would be gone now.
Instead, they followed Trump into oblivion.
So anyway, the resolution says, among other things, that the House stands with Israel as it defends itself against the barbaric war launched by Hamas and other terrorists.
Reaffirms Israel's right to self-defense.
It confirms Hamas' brutal war against Israel.
Well, again, there's nothing wrong with that.
And Thomas Massey said, I agree with all that part.
But you understand the tremendous amount of money, as I pointed out, and the fact that I forget how many times bigger Israel's gross domestic product is than their enemies.
They can certainly take care of themselves.
So, again, Thomas Massey joined them, and this is what he had to say on Twitter.
He said, I condemn the barbaric attack on Israel, and I affirm Israel's right to defend itself.
However, I will not be voting for House Resolution 771 today because, and he gave four reasons.
Number one, he says it calls for sanctions on a sovereign country.
Sanctions are a prelude to war, and they hurt the citizens of the country more than the government of the country that's being sanctioned.
Ultimately, sanctions create laws that will be used to prosecute American citizens who engage in trade, not citizens of the sanctioned country.
In short, sanctions do not achieve their stated purpose, but they breed resentment of our country abroad.
And they are an act of war.
Always have been. Madeline Albright, your sanctions killed a half million kids.
You starved them to death. Was it worth it?
Yeah, it was worth it. Yeah, I think so.
And as I said, I have viewed Trump's lockdowns of 2020 that he financed.
He paid the governors to lock people down just like he paid the hospitals to poison people.
But those lockdowns were economic sanctions against Main Street, middle class America that Trump said were not essential.
It was only the big box retailers who were essential.
Anyway, number two, it asserts the necessity of foreign aid commitments, which I have voted against.
Our country is going bankrupt.
We can't afford to borrow money and send it overseas, yet this resolution states that we should.
Number three, said Thomas Massey, it contains an open-ended promise of military support that is so broad that it could be interpreted to commit U.S. soldiers to the conflict.
U.S. troops should not be engaged in this conflict.
And I would add, especially without a declaration of a war.
Mike Johnson talks a great deal about the Constitution and the necessity of it.
Well, maybe you ought to pay attention to what it says about declarations of war, Mike Johnson.
Number four, he says it tends to broaden the conflict to other countries.
When it would be better to keep the war contained geographically.
And then he links to the text so people can see for themselves what he was talking about.
So, again, when we look at this, it's very important that we understand that nobody is perfect.
He does have some good points.
I'll talk about some of his good points, but he made it very clear that he wants Israel first.
And again, Massey said, it urges the full enforcement of U.S. sanctions against Iran.
And I disagree with that.
But he is not, even though he has supported what's going on in Syria, and I think that is a spillover, perhaps.
For his support of Israel, which, again, may be because of his Christian eschatology, because he did not support the Ukraine war.
I mean, it may be that he is supporting us in a broader Middle East war, which, again, is not in the U.S. interests.
You know, a war with Iran, a war with Lebanon, a war with Syria, a war with everybody, right, in the Middle East.
That is as foolish as a war with Russia.
But at least he doesn't say what the warmonger Mitch McConnell does.
He's getting pretty close to it, but he does not support Ukraine.
Mitch McConnell, of course, does.
He thinks that war is good.
Listen to this. If you look at the Ukraine assistance, let's talk about where the money is really going.
A significant portion of it's being spent in the United States, in 38 different states.
Military industrial corporations.
Placing the weapons that we sent to Ukraine with more modern weapons.
So we're rebuilding our industrial base.
That's what President Biden's seeking to do.
It's correct. No Americans are getting killed in Ukraine.
We're rebuilding our industrial base.
The Ukrainians are destroying the army of one of our biggest rivals.
I have a hard time finding anything wrong with that.
I think it's wonderful that they're defending themselves.
And also the notion that the Europeans are not doing enough.
They've done almost 90 billion dollars.
They're housing a bunch of refugees who escaped.
I think that our NATO allies in Europe have done quite a lot.
You sound like you have a lot in common with President Biden and his worldview, based on what you just laid out.
Well, not on the domestic side, but on this issue that we were discussing today, we're generally in the same place.
Yeah, we both want world war.
And we want an American empire.
And we don't want anything to stand in it.
So again, so Mike Johnson got an F grade from Republicans for Ukraine, a group that's backed by Bill Kristol.
So clearly he is on the other side.
And that's good news.
That's good news.
He voted against the 2022 Ukraine Supplemental Appropriation.
He voted in favor of an amendment which would have stricken $300 million of assistance for Ukraine.
He voted in favor of another amendment which would have prohibited all security assistance for Ukraine.
He voted in favor of another amendment to remove the extension of lend-lease authority to Ukraine.
He voted against Ukraine security supplemental appropriations, and he has made, as I said, anti-Ukraine statements or statements because he does not support the war.
He said we should not be sending another $40 billion abroad when our own border is in chaos.
American mothers are struggling to find baby formula.
Gas prices are at a record high.
American families are struggling to make ends meet without sufficient oversight over where the money will go, he said in a relevant statement about his lack of support for Ukraine.
So at least in that regard, it'll be interesting to see What is going to happen?
Because so many people have been pushing for this link of Ukraine and Israel, the big package.
Let's fund every war everywhere forever, okay?
Those people are pushing this out, and he is a Ukraine skeptic.
And so it'll be interesting to see, as speaker, what he does with that.
We're not going to stop.
The situation in the Middle East may escalate, but perhaps he may de-escalate what's going on in Ukraine.
And then he spoke about God in his speakership victory.
He said, I don't believe that there's any coincidence.
Well, that's true.
That's true. He said, we are all here because God has put each of us here.
He said, I want to tell all my colleagues here what I told the Republicans in that room last night.
I don't believe that there's any coincidences in a matter like this.
I believe that Scripture, the Bible, is very clear that God is the one who raises up those in authority.
He raised up each of you.
All of us, and I believe that God has ordained and allowed each one of us to be brought here for this specific moment of time.
Well, that is absolutely true.
100% true.
And that's not just true of politicians.
Each of us is where we are.
Each of us has been called to a time like this.
We've all got something to do.
And you never know what you're doing and how that is going to fit in the big picture.
But certainly God has that picture under control.
Ben Franklin, who's not a strong Christian, essentially said the same thing when they were putting the Constitution together.
I play that around every Thanksgiving, where he says he'd have to be blind not to see the hand of God's providence in our success against the biggest empire in the world at the time, the British Empire, the biggest, most powerful empire that man had ever seen, just like Biden was bragging the other day about America Today.
And he said, we're having a lot of problems putting this Constitution together.
I would suggest that we begin each day with a prayer, asking for God's guidance.
Of course, they didn't do that.
And maybe we could have gotten some other clauses in there if they had.
Who knows about that? But look, that is true.
And I'm glad that he honors God and honors the Bible and the Constitution.
And even if, from my perspective, he's somewhat inconsistent about that.
We all are, to some degree.
I think it's good to have somebody who has character, even if you disagree with him.
And he does seem to have character.
But when we look at this, you know, we're told to pray for leaders and those rulers in authority.
Pray for everybody, but especially told to pray for people who are rulers and in authority, so that we can have quiet and peaceful lives.
Not intrusion, not war and the rest of this.
And so when we look at this, the question is, there's no question that these people in Washington are there because God wants them there.
But the question remains, are they God's judgment against our society?
Because they may not be the people, even the people who say they're strong Christians, they may not be the people who are going to bring us quiet and peaceful lives.
So just be careful.
This is what people will typically say.
It doesn't give them carte blanche to do whatever they want.
And whatever your eschatology is, that does not give you carte blanche to ignore what God tells us to do as individuals.
And it does not give you carte blanche to ignore the Constitution either that you swore to.
Mike Johnson strongly supports impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden.
Here's what he said about impeachment.
Article 1, Section 2 of the Constitution itself expressly states that the sole power of impeachment belongs here to this House.
And then Article 2, Section 4 says, listen to the language carefully.
It's expressly written in the Constitution.
This is not political talking points.
We're not making this up. It says in Article 2, Section 4 that the president shall be removed from office.
On impeachment for and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
My friends, I just listed just a small sample, just the tip of the iceberg of the credible allegations and the mounting evidence that shows that Joseph Biden has engaged in bribery schemes, pay-to-play schemes.
This is what the evidence shows.
We have to follow it. We took an oath to uphold the Constitution.
The Constitution requires this action.
The inquiry is the appropriate step.
We have no choice to pursue the facts wherever they lead and we will leave no stone unturned.
Well, I agree with him.
I agree that the Constitution demands that Joe Biden be impeached.
I don't think that it demanded that Trump be impeached.
You know, I'm not a Trump supporter, and I didn't agree with any of the stuff that was being done with January 6th.
I thought it was a grift.
I thought it was a crime against his own supporters.
But I think it's outrageous.
The people who have been sent to jail, given outrageous terms, and Jamal Bowman, he pulled a fire alarm.
Everybody knows that he did it deliberately.
He's still lying about it.
But they showed the video to the prosecutors, and it's been about a month or so.
And they said, yeah, we're going to bring charges against him.
He's going to get a $1,000 fine.
End of story. Not decades in prison.
He disrupted an official proceeding.
He had a motive to do it.
He did it deliberately.
He knew exactly what he was doing.
And so I think that, you know, certainly if you're going to let this guy pass, a $1,000 fine.
Get a $1,000 fine to the January Sixers and let them out of jail.
Because, you know, we're paying for their incarceration as well.
But it is a great injustice and unequal protection of the law.
And there really is bribery and corruption with a Biden family.
Something needs to be done about that.
And I agree with him that the Constitution demands that they do something about that.
Last October, he led over two dozen of his colleagues in introducing the Stop the Sexualization of Children Act of 2022.
I agree with that.
This is essentially the same thing that they did in Florida, the parental rights bill that was called Don't Say Gay.
So really, is gay all about sexualization of children?
No, that's pedophilia.
And if these people want to blur the line on that, they blur it to their own peril.
You want to blur the line between gay and homosexual?
You want to say it's okay to sexually groom these kids in school?
That's absolutely no question what is happening there.
The bill's definition of sexually oriented material included any topic involving gender identity, gender dysphoria, transgenderism, sexual orientation, or related subjects.
Why are they pushing that on kids in school?
So again, he was absolutely right about that.
That is also something that makes him an enemy of the media.
The mainstream media is really going to come after him because of that and because of his support for Trump.
Like most of his GOP colleagues, Johnson voted against certifying the Electoral College results from Arizona and Pennsylvania even after January the 6th.
And, of course, this is being put out by Business Insider.
Again, part of the propaganda mainstream media.
Funded by Jeff Bezos, Washington Post.
They're like Washington Post, New York Times.
So they call it the, even after a mob, ransacked the Capitol on January 6th now.
Johnson was also lead organizer of an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in support of Texas' lawsuit...
Asking the court to halt the certification of the vote in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
And he sent a letter to his colleagues asking them to support that as well.
According to a biography, he has taught Constitution and Free Enterprise.
At Liberty University, their Helms School of Government.
So they hate that as well.
And, you know, they will drag in Jerry Falwell Jr.'s scandals every time they talk about Liberty University.
Again, that's something that they should have done.
It is a troubling thing to see that.
And we see these types of things.
Christians are not perfect.
And, you know, it is...
We should not give somebody a pass on any of this stuff.
You know, iron sharpens iron.
And, you know, we ought to not...
You don't walk away from this.
But you hold them accountable for this.
Tell them, you know, you need to do something about this.
Well, they finally did something about Jerry Falwell Jr., but we'll see what happens with that institution.
It reminded me very much of what we saw with Ken Starr.
Just amazing how Ken Starr covered for Bill Clinton as a special prosecutor, then became a defense attorney for Jeffrey Epstein, then went to Baylor University and covered for football players who were credibly charged with rape and all the rest of this.
That got him kicked out of there three times.
Every one of these times, this guy who is always held up as this model Christian, I think he was president of a Christian university, Pepperdine, I think he was president prior to that.
But again, you know, just a real reproach on the name of Christ, as Jerry Falwell Jr.
was with Liberty University.
Johnson's one of the few Americans in a covenant marriage, a legal arrangement that makes it harder for couples to get a divorce.
Well, that's kind of like the polar opposite of...
Trump with his prenups.
This is like, I guess you could call this a pre-not.
We're not going to get a divorce.
He married his wife, Kelly, in 1999.
Both of them voluntarily opted into this arrangement.
Under Louisiana state law, couples signed a document in which they agreed to seek marital counseling before they get a divorce.
Additionally, couples can only get divorced on a limited set of grounds, including for adultery.
If one partner committed a felony or faces imprisonment or physical or sexual abuse.
Well, you know, that's just the principles of Christian marriage.
But yeah, you can do it legally like that as well.
He said, That was a traumatic thing for our whole family.
I'm a big proponent of marriage and fidelity and all the things that can go with it.
And I've seen firsthand the devastation that divorce can cause.
And so he said, I think it'd be a pretty big red flag if you asked your maid or your fiancé, let's do a covenant marriage.
And they said, well, I don't really want to do that.
Listen to that. Let's do a prenuptial arrangement like Trump.
You don't get any of my stuff when I kick you out.
So look, again, he seems to be a thoughtful Christian and constitutionalist in many areas, but there's some very troubling contradictions in that.
And at least we got somebody who, unlike Biden, He doesn't think that he's God like Biden thinks he's God.
That's something there, at least.
So maybe he is somebody who would be amenable to people contacting him.
I don't think he's going to be amenable to what is going on with Israel, however.
So some of the comments on here.
Let's see. Dougalug, thank you very much for the tip.
He said, thank you, David, and salutations to the Rockfin family.
And don't say pedophile bill.
Oh, yeah. It's the don't say gay.
Yeah, that's really what it was.
Don't say groomer. Don't say pedophile.
That's really what the bill was.
That was a comment from my son.
KWD68, looking at the fact that Speaker Johnson voted against gay marriage, against aid to Ukraine, and not to certify the 2020 election, plus his mentioning of God yesterday, new target.
New target, I wonder, I'm not sure what you mean by that.
But yeah, that is, anyway, he says, now Congress can spend more money.
Yay. Yeah, that's right.
That's what that's going to mean.
Grammy for God says, don't they all have to swear allegiance to Israel?
So no big surprise there.
Christine 1235 says, ugh, here comes war.
Right so. Nick Ellenbecker, the right to self-defense does not mean the right to American funding.
Exactly right. Exactly right.
And it is very sad to see this.
KWD 68. Meanwhile, CVDC is in progress.
Invaders across the border.
COVID is gearing back up.
87,000 IRS agents ready to go.
And this is all a distraction.
Yeah. Yeah.
It'll be business as usual, I think.
Ann Crist. Supported Trump.
Enough said. Yeah.
Big judgment issue there, isn't it?
Syrian girl. I think we can forget about this speaker being a Christian.
If he were, he would never have been so overwhelmingly voted in.
I think so. John John 1976.
Johnson is the huge Zionist shill.
He is your typical Schofield study Bible brainwashed Christian Zionist.
Yeah, that's the Schofield study Bible.
That's where that eschatology is from.
Michael DeSilvio, another useful idiot.
And of course, it was kind of...
Kind of a given we were going to get that.
I mean, you know, when you look at Emmer, you know, the only thing I knew about him was that he had pushed back on CBDC, but then you start looking at it and it's like, whoa, whoa, whoa, close the lid on that thing.
There's too much stuff in there.
And, of course, the only reason that he opposed CBDC was because he was completely owned by the cryptocurrency industry.
Not because he supported your privacy.
Not because he was opposed to the Fed.
None of that stuff. Chavkin 321, let me get this straight.
Being a good Christian forces you to support Zionists.
How does that make sense?
Well, it's just his eschatology, you know.
Again, many of us do not believe that and do not believe that God needs our help.
And we make a distinction between the government of Israel and the Israelis who are there, who Netanyahu just used as lab rats.
And we make a distinction between, you know, all of Israel.
Look, all of Israel. Go throughout the Old Testament.
You know, the...
It was constantly. You had a very small number of people that were actually following God.
And they would get so small that God would judge the entire nation.
And that's our concern. How many real Christians do we have here that really want to follow God?
It's one thing to say, God's on our side.
Look! Look at this.
God's got me here for a reason.
Yeah, again, what is the reason?
Are you going to lead us into a war that will be a judgment from God against this country?
You can't interpret What God's purposes are.
All we can do is to go back and look at the history of Israel.
Look at what happens when people don't follow the clear principles that he lays out for people.
That's when you have war.
You have destruction. You have horrific things happening to you.
And that's my concern.
Perhaps he is there for such a time as this.
KWD68 elections are like watching a train wreck.
You see it coming? It's going to be bad.
You can't do anything about it.
That's right. Christian constitutional conservative, all empty words.
No one will be impeached on either side.
I think they may wind up doing, I think they'll do it because of an election.
And then I think it's not going to go through on the Senate side.
I think they'll shut it down there.
I don't think there's any chance of it going through because you've got to have too large a majority there.
So they'll do it on the House side.
They'll do it for virtue signaling in the same way that Pelosi did it.
Syrian girl, so at best the speakers are on their box of chocolates.
Most of them will probably be rotten, yeah.
KWD68, Johnson can speak and does not have Alzheimer's.
So at least there's that.
Yeah, at least there's that.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
to my show. Making
sense. Common again.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
The people, my people are so smart.
And you know what else they say about my people?
The polls. They say, I have the most loyal people.
Did you ever see that? Where I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose any voters, okay?
It's like incredible. Kill millions with his shot.
It's injections. And as one person pointed out here, and I chose not to really talk about it.
We don't know a great deal about it yet.
There's been a mass shooting in Maine at a bowling alley.
Over 20 people on top of Drudge.
It's 22 people they believe have been killed.
The shooter is still at large.
And everybody's going to be talking about that.
They're not going to be talking about the people that were shot by Trump.
Shot and killed. They're not going to be talking, they'll say, oh, well, we have this gun manufacturer is running ads that say, this is a great gun, you should buy it.
And they're encouraging mass shootings by running that gun ad.
They're targeting children.
Well, I think we saw children targeted with the jab.
I think we saw ads being run by, but, so he was pushing that all the time.
And then I saw this and I thought, how is this particular little skit about child sacrifice?
How is this funny?
By the way, nobody's laughing when he does this little thing.
I don't know what the possible context could be for something as cringy and evil as this.
But it is cringy and evil, just like him pushing the vaccine.
And he had not just the cartoon stuff, but he had guys dressed up like Rockettes, you know, with high heels and their hairy legs and all this other...
I mean, he's just filthy disgusting.
And then he does this about child sacrifice.
Me! I must appease him with the gift of a man-child!
Come to me!
I must lead you!
I must lead you to the Northwest!
And he runs over into this red fog.
Take the baby.
And he straightens his coat.
And his tie. Shrugs.
I'm sure the baby will be fine.
Yeah. Oh, really funny, wasn't it?
Is that what he did with the vaccine?
He sure did. He did exactly that.
Is that what he does with the abortions?
Exactly that. That's exactly what the abortions are.
Sacrifice your baby on this altar.
This god of prosperity.
Moloch. You know, the babies that you had because of your orgy when you were worshipping Ashtaroth.
That's exactly what he has done.
Sacrifice your child.
Take my vaccine from my sponsor.
And then we have chem.com putting out the Pfizer contract that has now come out of South Africa.
He said the secret vaccine purchase agreement that South Africa signed with Pfizer has been released.
Here's what it looks like.
They highlighted that down at the bottom.
And he says, so they point out, it's got unknown efficacy, unknown adverse effects, unknown long-term effects, and you will not hold us responsible for this.
As a matter of fact, you're going to hold us harmless, and you're going to have things set aside for us outside of your country, even.
And so here it is. Purchaser acknowledgment.
Purchaser acknowledges that the vaccine and materials related to the vaccine and their components and constituent materials are being rapidly developed due to the emergency circumstances of COVID-19 pandemic and will continue to be studied after provision of the vaccine to purchaser under this agreement.
Is that what we were told?
We were told it was all tested and it was all good.
No, no. Purchaser further acknowledges The long-term effects and the efficacy of the vaccine are not currently known.
But wait a minute. Six days after the election, Pfizer said it's completely 100% safe and it's 90% effective.
And then eight days later, they said we're 94.5% effective after Moderna said ours is 94%.
So the long-term effects...
And the efficacy of the vaccine, they said, are not known.
And they said further, to the extent that it's applicable, purchaser acknowledges that the product shall not be serialized.
But beyond that, they made statements about sovereign assets that you're going to set aside.
As I said, same thing in South Africa, and it was reported by Stat News, a pharmaceutical publication.
They did exactly this in Brazil and Argentina and a third country in Latin America that remained anonymous because that country signed on to it.
Brazil and Argentina didn't, and they complained about it.
And it was not reported widely in America.
It was reported in India for some reason, and it was reported by Stat News.
But even the alternative media did not really pick up on that.
But everybody's picking up on the South Africa thing, which is good.
But understand, it's not just one country.
They were doing this everywhere.
And we had the member of the European Parliament who said, I want to see what the contract looks like.
And they pushed, they pushed, and there was about half a dozen of them that held a press conference and said, this is what we got.
And they held up what was released to them, page after page, where everything was redacted.
He said, look at this! We told them you've got to give this.
We're members of the European Parliament.
We should be able to see this.
And they've redacted all of this stuff.
And so, on Twitter, in response to this, one person said, but before this final contract, they first insisted that South Africa sign over control of our sovereign assets to private hands.
But Zwelli Mikhazy alerted the public.
And they backtracked and removed those onerous clauses.
So that's not the final one.
The earlier one, they had the same clauses that Argentina and Brazil and the third country in Latin America had problems with.
But a month later, corruption allegations surfaced against Zoelli.
And a month later, he resigned.
Isn't it odd that the Minister of Health, who was on track to be our next president, was forced to resign because he saved our sovereign assets from being handed over to private hands?
You know, they have ways to get you, don't they?
Just like the intelligence community, the CIA, Chuck Schumer said.
Well, they've got a thousand different ways to come after you.
And of course, we should not be surprised because the CIA and the intelligence community is aligned with big pharmaceutical companies and they always have been with all these germ games going back to 2001.
And when we talk about distraction, and that's what KWD, when he said new target, he said, well, this is what I mean by it.
The media will make a show of Johnson.
They will focus on his Christianity, and they'll distract with it, and also his support of Trump.
Those will be the two things that they're going to focus on.
And you're right, it will be a distraction.
And when we look at how these distractions work, the master of distraction about all this pandemic, Fauci and his partner, his professional wrestling partner in all this, has been, sadly, Rand Paul.
Rand Paul is still out there.
He's blasting Fauci and the media for suppressing the lab leak story.
And this article from John Stossel, he did an interview with him, and John Stossel is just starry-eyed.
Rand Paul, oh, yes.
John Stossel bought this censorship stuff, hook, line, and sinker.
Well, they're censoring me everywhere.
I don't like that. But they're private companies and they can do anything they want.
No, they're not. You're a human being.
And you have rights that are more important than a corporation created by government.
That's a privilege. That's an artificial entity.
And it is not superior to you.
And your God-given rights are not to be taken away by an eternally existing perpetual corporation created as a privilege by government.
So anyway, he is now there with Rand.
And you've got to ask yourself, how could Rand Paul be so dense, really?
Is he honestly mistaken with this stuff?
Rand Paul is a medical doctor.
How could he not know?
That the jab has killed people.
How could he not know that the hospital death protocol that was part of the lockdown from Fauci, from Trump, killed people and not the so-called virus?
Rand Paul got a cold.
You get a cold? Oh, it's COVID, right?
He said, look, I got over it.
Yeah, this is not some kind of a pandemic or something killing everybody.
Rand Paul had the good sense not to take remdesivir, although he had his wife buy stock in the company.
Yeah. He got over it.
And his big thing was, well, Dr.
Fauci, are you going to make those of us who had COVID and got over it naturally, are you going to make us take the vaccine?
Because that's crazy. You know, I'm a doctor.
You're a doctor. We know that if you get something, that's your best form of immunity.
It's going to be better. Oh, no, no.
Natural immunity is not nearly as good as this Trump juice I've got.
And, you know, so they had that fight.
They had the fight about the lab leak theory, but he would not call out these hospital death protocols, and he won't call out the jab.
Is he afraid that maybe he's going to get the same treatment that that health minister in South Africa got when he pointed out the fraud of Pfizer?
Now, this is professional wrestling.
This is a distraction, sadly, from the scene of the crime.
The vaccine. The murder weapon.
Fauci, going back, as John Stossel says, Remember when Rand Paul accused then-White House Trump advisor Fauci of funding China's Wuhan virus lab?
And Fauci replied, Senator Paul, you don't know what you're talking about.
He said the media loved it.
Vanity Fair smirked.
Fauci once again forced to basically call Rand Paul a sniveling moron.
But now the magazine has changed its tune, admitting...
Quote, in a major shift, NIH admits funding risky virus research in Wuhan, and Paul might have been on to something.
See, there you go. Isn't that great?
We owned the libs, and we owned Fauci.
Big win for Rand Paul.
Big win for John Stossel and the Libertarians at Reason Magazine.
Isn't that great? We owned them.
We made them eat crow.
Except they're still injecting this murder weapon into people.
And Rand Paul is driving the getaway car.
He really is.
That's what this is.
This is misdirection.
It's a shell game. Don't pay attention to that vaccine.
Take a look at that Wuhan lab and those horrible Chinese.
We need to go to war with the Chinese, you know, because of that.
Look what they did to us. They wrecked our economy.
They made us do things that are absolutely unconstitutional.
We destroyed businesses left and right here.
There's an article from Breitbart talking about the oldest comic shops in L.A., They're having to close their doors because they said COVID lockdowns completely depleted our savings and we couldn't recover.
They had been in L.A. since 1977, but Trump's lockdown completely destroyed them.
Well, when we look at the pharmaceutical drugs, In general, you know, the vaccines are a special case.
But in general, what are pharmaceutical drugs really about?
We all know it's about covering up a problem, covering up the symptoms of the problem without getting to the root cause.
And then, of course, the adverse effects for the thing that you're taking it for, even if it covers up those symptoms.
And again, their business model is not to cure anything.
Goldman Sachs lectured Gilead, the manufacturers of remdesivir, back in the spring of 2018.
It was April or May. And it was widely covered by not just pharmaceutical trade magazines, but also by financial magazines.
And Goldman Sachs says, look, you made like $12 billion on this drug that cured...
Want a strain of hepatitis?
But look at this. Because you cured it, your revenue from this thing went down exponentially.
That's not a sustainable business model.
We want drugs that are going to treat chronic conditions, not cure diseases.
We want you to do something that alleviates the symptoms a little bit, but doesn't cure the disease.
And perhaps, you know, give us with adverse effects maybe several more Problems that we can then give people drugs for each of those, and we can start to magnify this until we kill the person.
But we'll make a lot of money.
That's their business model.
And so their business model has always been, of all pharmaceutical stuff, ignore the root problem, cover up the symptoms, create new problems.
And now we see this not just with our physical body, But we see it now with our minds and our spirits.
Because there's every day, I see yet another article that just worships the ability of psychedelics to fix all of our, you know, whatever we're concerned about.
It's going to do a miraculous healing of our spirit and mind.
We see this over and over again.
A new era.
Psychedelics in Oregon.
This is a story from the New York Times.
They misspelled it. It shouldn't be E-R-A. It should be E-R-R-O-R. A new error.
This one about psychedelics.
And it really is.
They're selling you the Brave New World approach.
It's not just the rampant sexuality and pedophilia in schools.
It's also, you know, take a gram.
Don't give a damn. Right?
Sex and drugs. We're going to distract you.
We're going to take you out of the real world here.
And so they began their little story by talking about a Marine Corps veteran who was sexually assaulted during his time in the Armed Forces.
He's been searching unsuccessfully for a way to put those nightmarish years behind him.
Now he is ready for a different kind of journey, a psychedelic trip through the nether regions of his own mind.
As he felt his thoughts starting to spin, his facilitator urged him to surrender.
And let the mushrooms guide him.
It's like the idea of planting a seed and then letting it go.
You notice, if you're a Christian, how similar this is.
Right? Oh, got a facilitator here.
Got the holy mushroom here.
It is deeply religious.
And you know, when I talk about the pharmakia, Again, you know, the word that we get pharmacy from, the people who push drugs.
And I said it, you know, it's translated as sorcery in the Bible, the Greek word.
But it really did fit when we looked at the pharmakia, the big pharmakia, and how they did not repent of their murders.
The biggest men in the world, right?
Not repenting of their murder.
Big in terms of these big corporations.
Big in terms of all the leaders of these countries.
They will not repent of these murders.
But I understand also that the reason that was translated to sorcery was because hallucinogenic drugs are such a core part of all religions, almost all religions, not of Christianity, but almost all of pagan religions.
And so these people who have, for the longest time, have got a physical condition, a physical problem, They'll give you a drug to cover up those symptoms, and then that drug will give you other problems as well.
And that is the model that we have with this now for your mind, for your spirit, as they're moving into this.
So I've said many times, you know, why is it that somebody like Joe Rogan Quite frankly, he doesn't seem to be very well-read, very well-informed, or very intelligent.
He reminds me of Curly from the Three Stooges, except he doesn't do that woo-woo thing.
But he's always like, really?
Oh, wow. Tell me more about that.
And when he does have a strong opinion, he's usually wrong about it because he's not informed.
But he does push mushrooms.
And he does get $25, $30 million doing this stuff.
I tell you, you know, Satan does reward richly in this life, doesn't he?
And so this guy says, well, I'm trying to reset my brain to where I can look at life in a new way.
That's exactly what they say.
Phony hope, a phony religion, a phony fix.
Because, and I've not covered this, I thought it was kind of interesting.
I said, well, let's wait and see what they say was really the root cause of this, because there's something going on with this guy with Alaska Airlines.
He was sitting in the jump seat.
He was an off-duty pilot, and he's, you know, off-duty pilots are allowed to sit up with the pilots and talk to them.
They sit in the jump seat, and they get a free ride on this thing.
And in the middle of the flight, this guy, who's 44 years old, Jumps up and tries to shut the plane down, and they had to fight him off.
He nearly caused the plane to crash, and so when they landed, they charged him with 83 counts of attempted murder and several other things.
Attempted murder for each person on the plane.
Now, as more details come out with the indictment, it appears that what they're saying is that he took magic mushrooms 48 hours before this happened.
He was hallucinating on this.
The off-duty pilot accused of trying to bring down Lask Airlines flight told investigators that he took psychedelic mushrooms 48 hours before the incident, that he had been depressed, and that he believed he was experiencing a mental breakdown.
Joseph Emerson is a caring father, a loving husband, a skilled aviator, who was supported and loved by his vast network of friends, family, and colleagues.
He would never intentionally hurt another person.
Joe was not under the influence of any intoxicants when he boarded that flight.
So they ruled this out as an intoxicant.
We will pursue a diligent investigation of all the facts and circumstances surrounding the events and requests that you respect the family's privacy, said an attorney.
Emerson also said that he had not slept for 40 hours, and he indicated that his depression may have been boosted by the recent death of a friend.
Well, you know, people have friends who die all the time, and they don't try to crash the plane into the ground.
He indicated that he was in a mental crisis, had not slept for over 40 hours, and requested medical attention, said the Oregon filing.
The Oregon complaint filed Tuesday added details among them that Emerson said he took mushrooms two days before the flight.
Emerson denied to investigators that he had taken any medication before he got on the flight, but he spoke about becoming depressed six months ago and said that when he took the mushrooms two days before this event, it was the first time that he had taken mushrooms.
He said, I didn't feel okay.
It seemed like the pilots weren't paying attention to what was going on.
I pulled both emergency shutoff handles because I thought I was dreaming and I just wanted to wake up.
The psychoactive experience associated with psychedelic mushrooms is said to normally last four to six hours, sometimes eight, but it often depends on dosage.
However, a psychedelic drug researcher, Dr.
Charles Grobe, director of child and adolescent psychiatry.
Do you hear that? This guy is an expert on using...
He's a psychiatrist.
He's a child psychiatrist.
And as a child psychiatrist, he's had experience using these mushrooms.
They're using these on kids.
Isn't that astounding?
They just kind of run past this with NBC News.
I saw that and it's like, whoa, wait a minute.
Giving magic mushrooms to children and adolescents in his child and adolescent psychiatry practice at UCLA Medical Center.
He said it's possible the effects of psilocybin could last for days after injection under certain conditions.
He said, I wouldn't doubt that psilocybin mushrooms could have had residual effects even 48 hours after ingestion, especially if he took a large dose and was without any effective supervision, preparation, oversight, or follow-up investigation, said Grobe.
I wonder what dosage he gives to kids.
The federal complaint alleges that Emerson was engaging in casual conversation with other pilots, discussing the weather and his career with Alaska Airlines, when he tried to grab two red handles and activate a fire suppression system.
Activation includes cutting power, according to the filing.
Emerson threw his headset across the cockpit and told the pilots, I'm not okay!
I think so, yeah.
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy, as Nicholson said, as he reached for the handles.
The pilot said a flight screen indicated a fire suppression system was activated, according to the state criminal complaint, but it appeared that the engines had not been cut off.
That would have resulted in the planes gliding and descending.
Yeah, descending, definitely, said the other pilot.
That pilot said the plane was seconds away from being a glider, but that Emerson was not able to pull the handles all the way down before the pair intervened, according to the state complaint.
So, I guess you didn't know there was a kill switch on the planes.
Ejector seats or whatever.
In case of emergency, you're out of here.
I don't know. Experts say the ability to quickly turn off an engine may be crucial in emergency situations such as fires.
One of the pilots grabbed Emerson's wrists while the other declared an in-flight emergency, according to the federal document.
Emerson had to be wrestled with for several seconds until he settled down.
And then he said, you need to cuff me right now or it's going to be bad.
And so they did.
Um... They put flex handcuffs around his wrists and they were able to land the plane.
One person who was a passenger says they took him out of the front of the thing in handcuffs, took him to the back.
She said, I made eye contact with him.
It was like one of those soul-chilling, dead in the eyes, just calm, and just kind of like he was taking in everyone around him.
So, again, when we look at this, keep this in mind as they're pushing these psychoactive drugs, and they're pushing them pretty hard.
They're telling people that doctors are regularly taking ecstasy, so that's fine.
You can take ecstasy.
And we're getting in contact with, you know, Other beings in another dimension or whatever.
So just take some DMT. It's fun.
You know, you're going to meet various people there.
We're living in...
Times that Western civilization has not seen for quite, this is not unprecedented.
We've seen this type of thing before.
But it is new.
We haven't seen this type of thing for centuries in Western civilization.
Because the foundation of Western civilization, Christianity, is disappearing in our countries.
It's not disappearing around the world.
It's thriving in many other places in the world.
But not in our area of the world.
Which is another indication that, yes, these people have been picked to rule over us.
But that doesn't mean that that's going to be a good thing.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
you know.
And some of the comments on that last segment, Christian Constitutional Conservative says, but let's legalize drugs, right, David?
Well, you know, that's the thing.
I do not support prohibition.
And I don't support it because look what happened with alcohol.
I don't support the use of alcohol.
And I'll be more than happy to talk to people all the time about the bad effects of alcohol, the addictive aspects of it, how it destroys your body, how it destroys relationships and families and all the rest of this stuff.
But prohibition doesn't work.
I wish it did.
I wish we had a simple solution like that.
You see, the key thing is that whenever we see a problem, our first reaction is to have government fix it.
And government is force, like fired as a fearful servant and a dreadful master.
Government force is not capable of fixing what is hurting our soul any more than the mushrooms are.
And if we lean on that cane, it's going to pierce our hand, as it has for the last 50 years.
And so the answer is for Christians to offer a real cure, a real alternative to that.
Jesus Christ.
When the Son frees you, you are free indeed.
And He can free you from any kind of addiction, whether it's to drugs or to money or to sex or any of that, you know, There's so many different ways that we can be taken captive and addicted to things.
Jason Barker says, this proves the fraud part.
They should be put in jail. Their immunity does not protect them from deliberate fraud.
Referring again to the Pfizer documents that we've seen over and over again.
And it was fraudulent.
We have that now in writing where they say, we don't know the safety or the efficacy of this stuff.
And yet they were telling everybody exactly the opposite, weren't they?
And so was the government. And so was the media.
And so were people like Stephen Colbert, all the rest of them.
Joe McGuffin, there were numerous clinical studies far before any vaccines were ready to go with different styles of messaging to measure how many people would take it.
That's right. The Yale study, I think we talked about that in July of 2020.
And they had a dozen different ways.
They laid out the arguments of how they would do it.
As a matter of fact, you had a guy named Curtis Chang, who made a lot of money from the Trump administration because he put together a website and information and brought in Trump-supporting pastors like Jeffries and Robert Jeffries, I think it is, in Dallas.
Big Trump supporter and others.
And they talked about how it was the duty of pastors to get their people to take the vaccine and all the rest of the stuff.
A real betrayal. But he made a lot of money with it.
And they talked about different things.
Oh, it's a miracle from God.
It's science. It is.
You have to obey the government. You have to love your neighbor.
All these different things. They had a dozen of these things in there.
You know, a lot of them. It's science.
Listen to the science. These are our experts.
Follow the experts. Listen to people in authority.
All these different arguments.
And they had gone through and they said, well, this one works better for these type of people.
That works better for that group.
They were tailoring these arguments for different groups of people.
And they actually had Judas goats out there that they were paying.
Judas Goats for the black community.
Judas Goats for the Christian community.
And on and on. Brian, Deb McCartney.
Rand Paul is a player and a sellout.
Absolutely. You know, the heir, I think, to Rand Paul is Thomas Massey.
He has a lot of integrity.
And he may have more integrity than even Ron Paul.
It's good to see him stand on principle, even if he's the only one doing it.
Angry Tiger, thank you very much for the tip.
I appreciate that. Good footprints.
Rand still voted to support Israel with every sitting senator.
He was wanting non-military to be the support.
But really, Rand, come on, what else are you going to do?
Hazel Kitty, 57, they've poisoned us.
Autoimmune disease used to be rare.
Now it is rampant. Yep, just unlike autism.
Now, oh, well, you know, heart attacks are normal in young children and athletes.
So, you know, we're going to institute some new screening that we've never, ever done before.
Yeah, just normalize it.
Trump Burger Forever. David, psychedelic drugs have been proven to cure addiction.
Yeah, so has Christ.
Without these negative side effects.
Ann Crist. They will get us whether it be a jab in the arm or a piece of lettuce.
Or on a piece of lettuce. Yeah, grow the vaccines and the stuff.
Yona Anawodi says, own a ticket to see Fauci speak live near you for only $300.
Yeah. SoloCat, 1980.
Disney has people believing that sorcery is a wizard with a magic wand.
Sorcery is actually drugs.
Yeah, they have, and I mentioned that briefly last week, you know, before they got the rights to Mary Poppins.
And Mary Poppins is really kind of a dark book.
They kind of, they brighten it up.
They take something that's really, really dark.
And they make it all shiny and all that kind of stuff and palatable.
Why don't you put a spoonful of sugar?
It helps the sorcery go down.
And that trailer that I showed where somebody went through and they just took scenes from Mary Poppins and did cuts with music that was kind of sinister and it looks like a horror show.
But before Mary Poppins, they were planning on doing How to Become a Witch.
And there was something like Bedknobs and Broomsticks or something like that.
But they went with the title Bedknobs and Broomsticks and How to Become a Witch.
They bought the rights to several novels from that, also a British author.
And then they did that as well.
I mean, they've been selling that kind of stuff for a very long time.
And now we have a university that is offering a major in that in the U.K., And I think you're going to see a lot more of those.
Certainly look at what is happening, you know, in our society as people move to that.
Let's see. Two more comments here.
Sarah Key, a lot of people need to reset their brains after 13 years of public school indoctrination and pharmaceutical meds.
I'm not against mushrooms.
Well, use them at your own peril.
There are things that you can do that don't take you out of reality, but they actually show you the higher reality.
They don't mask the symptom, but they get to the core of the issue.
The core of the issue is our fallen souls.
So, HazelKitty57, I did a lot of drugs in my college days, wish I had never touched any of them.
And God saved me from that as well before I ever did any, and I'm really grateful for that.
I mean, it was rampant in college, and it was rampant where I worked.
I worked as a musician, and everybody was doing drugs.
People in the group were doing drugs, and people in the audience were doing drugs.
I was kind of the odd man out.
And I guess one of the things is, you know, when you're sober and you see somebody out there trying to dance when they're drunk, That also helps.
That was...
Anyway, Christian Constitutional Conservative.
David in response to you, we're seeing escalations in ER visits by our youth since legalizing drugs.
We, as a society, are not ready for self-governance.
Well, I agree. I agree.
We need to get that message out.
And that's the problem. Yeah.
The church just isn't affecting the culture at all.
No effect whatsoever on the culture.
And Patrick asks, thank you very much for the tip.
Let's talk about some news here before Tony joins us.
As I mentioned before, Jamal Bowman charged for pulling the fire alarm.
Nothing really is going to happen to them.
This is back September the 30th.
And, you know, he obstructed an official proceeding, which was the big deal about January the 6th, right?
And then they tacked on this, oh, well, this is some kind of an insurrection and, you know, that kind of stuff.
But the main thing that they got against everybody was obstruction of an official proceeding, which is exactly what he did.
The charge was for willfully and knowingly giving a false alarm of fire in violation of the D.C. code.
He knew exactly what he was doing for years.
It was a principle. He knows how the fire alarms work.
It's got fire.
In case a fire pull, this alarm will sound.
But all he's going to get is a $1,000 fine.
Not decades in jail.
I am responsible for activating a fire alarm.
I will be paying the fine issued, and I look forward to these charges being ultimately dropped.
Allahu Akbar, he said.
No, he didn't say the last bit.
I just screamed as part of the member of the socialist squad there as well.
Death to capitalist pigs as he pulled the fire alarm.
Our agents gathered all the evidence.
I wonder if that was on there, if they had any sound.
I would like to know if he did yell.
Allahu Akbar or death to capitalist pigs.
Bowman, a former school principal, knew all about this.
The incident came as Democrats were trying to delay a vote on a bill to extend the government funding deadline and averted government shutdown.
Well, you know, pulling the fire alarm, that does delay the vote.
It can also...
Delay your test that you're not prepared for.
You know, some kind of a bomb scare or something like that.
And it can also get you in big trouble.
Unless, unless you're a Democrat congressman.
Justin Amash, who used to be a congressman.
So this is not confusing at all.
There's a push bar on the door below the sign.
Members of Congress see these signs all the time.
Everybody knows exactly what they mean.
I can't even imagine thinking it has something to do with a fire alarm pull on the wall.
Stop excusing this.
He said, yeah, I thought the alarm would open the door.
Well, you know, I would have thought that the alarm might open the jailhouse door for him.
Or maybe even better, instead of locking everybody up.
These people who are in jail.
Open the jailhouse door for them and let them out.
Because there isn't equal protection under the law.
What a corrupt government we have.
Meanwhile, the UFC has announced the ultimate fighting championship.
Has announced a $100 million deal with Bud Light.
Bud Light wants to get back their manly image.
And after being disgraced with Dylan Mulvaney, Bud Light is trying to associate themselves now with the Ultimate Fighting Championship.
They promoted Dylan Mulvaney, the guy who dresses up as a woman, as part of his attempt to celebrate 365 days of girlhood.
Well, he's not a girl.
UFC's CEO Dana White announced the new partnership.
There's many reasons why I chose to go with Anheuser-Busch and Bud Light.
I think 100 million of them.
That can count, you know.
Most importantly, because I feel we're very aligned when it comes to our core values.
Money. Money.
And what the UFC brand stands for.
I'm looking forward to all the incredible things we'll do in the years ahead.
Oh, that's right. That's a good way to describe Dylan's girlhood.
It truly was incredible.
Unbelievable. In the extreme.
To shed the gay beer image, says the Babylon Bee.
Bud Light partners with a sport where sweaty men in their underwear hugged for 25 minutes.
Ha! Yeah, that pretty much sums it up, I guess.
Yeah, I've never been a big fan of that.
Anyway, Oregon is no longer going to require proficiency in writing and reading and math in order to graduate high school.
Expect there to be a lot more fire alarms that are going to be pulled.
They can't read. What's this right there?
I don't know. Just pull it. I can't read.
I graduated from Oregon school.
Government school. Leaders at the Oregon Department of Education and members of the state school board said requiring all students to pass one of several standardized tests.
That's just not fair. That's just not fair.
They said it is a harmful hurdle.
A harmful hurdle for historically marginalized students.
And they said, you know, Especially, you've got a lot of students who don't speak English, so it's really hard for them to be able to read English and to answer questions.
Maybe they ought to learn English so that they will have some more opportunities so that they can participate in a society.
But then there's this, and I thought this was very interesting from Technocracy News.
It was actually responding to the rapid advances in quantum computing.
Which is not something that I had paid much attention to.
I hear talk about quantum computing all the time and how it is accelerating.
But the rate at which it is accelerating is truly amazing.
And it has so much computational power.
Many people said, well, you know, once you get quantum computing and you get these super fast computers, they'll be able to run through all the different permutations and crank out somebody's password or various other things like that.
They really are expecting to be able to break cryptography and many other things like that with the new quantum computing.
So it has big issues for us in terms of privacy.
It's one of the reasons why the NSA built their Bluffdale, Utah storage facility, and there's others as well.
I think there's one in Maryland as well.
But they built these things to record everything that's out there on the Internet.
Because they're going to go back and they're going to go through it with a fine-tooth comb.
And so Technocracy News headline was, May God Help Us.
Technocrats are blowing the lid off quantum computing with a new 1180 qubit processor.
Now, qubit is a measurement of performance, actually.
It's kind of...
I know many of you think of qubit as...
And we define the size of the arc.
But this is Q-U-B-I-T. And it's not really a full analogy to what we talk about as being a bit, you know, a binary digit, a one or a zero.
I have eight of those that make up a byte and so forth.
You know, we have... It's not exactly an analogy to that.
It has something to do with storage, but it also has something to do with speed.
And I'll just kind of leave it at that without getting into a lot of detail, which, quite frankly, I don't understand quantum...
I don't understand quantum mechanics.
The guy who put it together, I don't feel bad to admit that, because the guy who put it together said, if you say that you understand quantum mechanics, you don't know what you're talking about.
The people who are using it don't understand how it works.
They just use it.
And so Technocracy News says on August the 17th, 2017, I wrote proponents of the technocracy are counting on the coming of age of quantum computers to enable their science of social engineering and world control.
However, this leading physicist says that quantum computers will be tools of destruction, not creation.
And I think we should be asking some hard questions.
You may think this is over your head, but it's not a stretch for you to see that there's a train that is about to hit us.
And so as they go through it and they talk about it, they said the first two-qubit computer was in 1998.
By 20 years later, they had a computer that went up to 20 qubits.
So over a period of, you know, from 1998 to 2019, 20 years, 21 years, it went up by a factor of 10.
And then over the next two years, somebody else unveiled their computer, it went up by a factor of six in just two years.
So a factor of 20 in a factor of 10 in 20 years, and then it accelerates six times faster in just two years.
Then the next year, four times faster.
Then this last year, another three times faster.
Well, the bottom line is it's gone from 2 to 1,180 cubits in 25 years.
It's gone up about 600 times faster, more capacity.
And they say that now they have come up with a way to really rapidly scale this, even more so.
And they said, we're going to see this go to tens of thousands of cubits and beyond.
Remember, in 1998 it was two.
And now it's going to go up to tens of thousands.
So, the...
As...
IBM said when they unveiled their 433 qubit one in January of 2023, they said the previous November, IBM had unveiled its 433 qubit processor.
If represented in traditional bits, it would far exceed the total number of atoms in the known universe.
And so it isn't a direct analogy to a binary digit a bit.
But the bottom line is that now they're talking about having tens of thousands of qubits.
And this technology is orders of magnitude larger than the atomic bomb.
The end of the Internet as we know it today is over, says Technocracy News.
Privacy is over.
When AI gets scaled into oblivion on quantum computers...
Reality will be over.
And he says, this is a comment from Technocracy News, he said, technocrats build things because they can.
Not because there is a demonstrated need to do so.
And now they are on this trajectory.
Can you see the freight train coming?
You ain't seen nothing yet.
When you stop and think about how rapidly this has increased, you may be familiar with Moore's Law.
He was a scientist, I think he was CEO, of Intel.
And he pointed out, we've seen the rapid advances in the complexity of integrated circuits.
And so for several decades, we've had the number of transistors on an integrated circuit has doubled every two years.
But they're saying that we expect that this is going to multiply qubits on the machine by about 10 every couple of years.
Ten times. Not two times.
It's going to grow five times faster than we've seen the changes in integrated circuits.
You're going to see massive, massive change.
And, of course, we understand that technology is not good or evil inherently in and of itself.
It's just that the people who have control of all this stuff, a handful of billionaires and our governments, are evil, and they will put this technology to evil use.
So we're going to take a quick break, and Tony is going to join us.
He's ready to go. And we'll be right back when we talk about what's going on with gold and how wars are affecting it and all the rest of the stuff.
We'll be right back. The Common Man.
They created common core to dumb down our children.
They created common past to track and control us.
Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
Thank you for listening.
Thank you for sharing.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
TheDavidKnightShow.com Joining us now is Tony Arterman of Wise Wolf Gold.
And Tony has set up, very kind of him to do this, he supports the program.
He's set up davidknight.gold.
And so if you go there, he knows that he came through this program.
And he's got, again, Tony can lock in the price for things as it's happening now.
And that's seeing a lot of volatility because of the wars, because of concern about what's going to happen with oil and the price of energy.
But he can...
I'll lock in the price for you, and he can handle transactions small or large.
And if you want to, you can even set up something to save on a regular basis.
So joining us now is Tony.
Thanks for joining us, Tony. It's good to see you, David.
Always great to be here. I'm back in my Branson office.
I've got my David Knight mug.
Oh, that's good. What's going on?
It must be pretty crazy now, because we're seeing some jumps.
And of course, when I look at this, they were saying that back in 2020, when all the lockdown was happening and that kind of economic unrest happened, It wasn't uncommon to see gold jump in one direction or the other $100 a day.
You haven't seen that kind of volatility yet, have you?
No, but the tweets and the prognostications from the mainstream didn't age well over the last few weeks with the war between Israel and Hamas, which is really a war between Israel and Iran.
And, of course, gold was headed down to the low 1800s.
It's back at 1979, as of this morning, when I woke up.
And I still think that's absolutely cheap.
A lot of the so-called experts have wondered why the rising interest rates by Jerome Powell haven't pushed gold down further.
It's because gold demand is at an all-time high, and it's an all-time high mainly from central banks, but it's becoming a demanded product from the people around the world, especially in places like China.
So that's why I think you're seeing the gold price continue to rise.
I mean, we don't know what's going to happen around the corner, but fear, uncertainty, and doubt.
It's the order of the day, I believe.
Oh, yeah. That's always there.
And when we talk about China, there's no question that they're trading their dollars for gold very rapidly.
The only question about it is, what is their motivation?
You know, is there some kind of a geopolitical strategy to it?
Or is it just that because they're having problems in China, you know, China's got a 300 percent...
A debt-to-GDP ratio, because they've had a centrally planned economy, and they've been misallocating resources like Biden wants to.
But they have the power to be able to do that right away, as Trudeau and George W. Bush have always envied China's ability to just be a dictatorship.
So they've malinvested this money.
We're at about, I think, $150.
30% above our debt ratio is 130% of our GDP, but they're 300%.
And so they need to prop up their currency as well.
And so they've been trading in their dollars to try to do that, but it also may have a geopolitical move.
But the key thing behind it is that they're moving to gold.
That's where they're moving.
Yeah, the rest of the world's moving there, too.
I mean, we see the loss of the purchasing power of the dollar.
It's one of the reasons I think you and I have spoken about this for months and months now, wondering what Jerome Powell's doing.
And, you know, you see the cascading effect by raising interest rates by the Federal Reserve.
You're starting to see other central banks needing bailouts by their own governments.
The Bank of England needed a bailout recently, and I just read an article up on Zero Hedge by Quota Raven, the world's oldest central bank, the Bank of Sweden, is needing a $7 billion bailout from Parliament, from the Swedish Parliament.
I've discussed with you on the show, and somehow, I don't know how they always seem to get this in these charters that no one ever talks about, especially the origin story of the Federal Reserve.
The Federal Reserve's charter, if they make money, the Federal Reserve, this privately owned central bank, if they make money off their interest rate schemes, Then they get to keep it.
But if they lose money, the United States Treasury has to bail them out.
And so the Federal Reserve, our Federal Reserve, is losing money right now.
Because they've raised interest rates and their return and the bonds and all of that, the cumulative funding, is at a loss.
It's in the red. So this is a phenomenon going on around the world.
I think you're seeing the implosion of the fiat currency central banking system, David.
And again, I'm just a paratrooper who likes books and history.
I don't claim to be an economic expert.
But the so-called smart set, the Keynesians, I don't think they're going to be proven right, and I think they're going to be weighed in the balance and found wanting at the end of all this.
I think the handwriting's on the wall when it comes to gold getting out of the traditional system, and I think people instinctually know that, and especially when you start seeing the numbers, the true numbers of what central banks are ordering, and there's going to be a currency revaluation.
I mean, if we're going to get down to brass tacks, David, what's all this?
And we finally got a Goldilocks war.
You know, we got the new Speaker of the House.
I was listening to your commentary this morning.
It's so disappointing.
It is. You get somebody who considers himself a Christian constitutional conservative.
Yeah.
And yet they want, you know, hyper interventionist Israeli first foreign policy, something that I've been fighting against since I got home from Iraq and going back to my hometown church and hearing people talk about this, this insane foreign policy of putting Israel first, this Christian Zionism stuff. this insane foreign policy of putting Israel first, this Christian And I, I found it to just be an abomination.
It's, it's so warlike, so hawkish.
And so out of the American character, I don't think George Washington or Thomas Jefferson or, or John Quincy Adams would be supporting these wars.
This is out of our tradition.
That's right. But yet, again, it's like somebody saying, I'm a teetotaler, but I have some wine every night for the antioxidants.
I mean, it's not... They're saying I'm a constitutional conservative, but yes, they're lurching us towards war.
So we finally found a war for the right, and of course the left has Ukraine.
So this is coming together, but I think these two wars actually flow together.
I think they touch in a way, and because it has to do with Iran, and it has to do with Iran's relationship to Russia.
These are both oil-rich countries.
Their economies are built on energy.
Whenever the price of oil goes up, they benefit.
And so Iran is always saber-rattled whenever there's been sanctions or whenever there's been a talk of doing something about their nuclear program.
Somehow the price of oil goes up, they get the windfall.
There's something more to this.
The mainstream is focusing on Hamas, which the Israelis and the Americans propped up until it wasn't convenient anymore.
But I think Hamas really ties back to Iran's.
So this is a bigger picture geopolitical struggle.
And at the root of it, at the heart of it, is the currency wars.
I think that's what we're seeing play out right now.
And it has to do with the sanctions and it has to do with energy.
Oh, I agree. Yeah, when you look at the connection, as you're right to point out, between Russia and Iran, the oil, but also a defense connection.
Iran's been sending lots of drones for Russia to use and that type of thing.
They've been working with Hezbollah, and they're just, you know, they're this close to engaging with Hezbollah and everybody, there's no question about that.
But they've also been saying in the news that Hamas was doing their training in Iran, For this attack and other things like that.
So they continue to tie it back.
And if you go back, you look at every single one of these wars, Netanyahu has tried to use that to push us into a war with Iran.
And so have all the U.S. warmongers have been trying to do that as well.
And so Nuki Haley and Lindsey Graham and John McCain and Netanyahu, all of them, I've been pushing for a war with Iran for, you know, more than two decades.
And you're right to say that this is the Iran war that they're really pushing us towards.
And it's really sad to see that happening.
But they've kind of got a war now that, like you pointed out, you know, one war for the left and one war for the right.
It's kind of like what we saw happening with Ronald Reagan and the budget deficit.
You give me money for the military, and I'll give you money for social programs, and, you know, we'll get this exploding deficit.
But now we're going to get a war that's going to explode in our face.
Well, the consequences of this, David, are high energy prices.
I mean, aside from blood and treasure, and that may be the war that bankrupts and finally ends the United States Empire.
Yes. Has anybody just stepped back for a minute and asked the question, has Hamas really thought this through?
I mean, the handlers of Hamas, and have they run the simulation?
If so, then they concluded that their risk was worth it.
What does that lead to?
Do they think they're going to be obliterated, or do they think they're going to drag the West into And Israel into a cataclysm.
Is that their goal? Because they're succeeding, if that's the case.
Because we are ramping up. Again, no off-ramps.
For peace. So I'm a pessimist when it comes to what's going to happen with the global economy, what's going to happen with peace and free commerce and trade.
It doesn't look good.
These are perilous times, times of war.
Go ahead, David.
I was just going to say, the U.S. has repeatedly shut down any interest with Ukraine in terms of having peace talks, and of course they don't want peace this time.
They've been pushing for this for decades, and they don't want peace in this.
And When you look at what Petraeus said, and other people have said it as well, I don't like David Petraeus, but certainly he's right when he says this is going to be Mogadishu on steroids.
They've had all this time to create these tunnels.
They knew exactly what the reaction was going to be, that they were going to attack Gaza, that they were going to come into Gaza.
And I understand these guys are suicidal lunatics to a large degree, but certainly there's a method to their madness.
And these tunnels are going to be just, it's going to be unlike anything they've seen in urban warfare before.
This is all the aspects we saw in Vietnam, how effective the tunnels were for the Viet Cong.
And now with saturation bombing, they couldn't do anything about it, really.
But now you add to that urban warfare, and you combine those two things together.
We haven't really seen anything like that before anywhere.
And it really is going to be a meat grinder, and that's going to be the magnet that pulls in the U.S. and many others in addition to what's going on with Hezbollah.
So I agree.
I think it's only going to escalate.
And as you and I have talked about many times, You want to kick off massive inflation and economic unrest, you do it by messing with the price of energy.
And that has been Biden's agenda from day one.
And this is just escalating it and also taking us to war as a distraction.
Well, it solves lots of problems for them.
You know, they've got their favorite, they've got population controls, kind of the Malthusian trifecta, famine, pestilence, and war.
But you also get to stop mobility.
It becomes unaffordable to move.
You can't put gas in the car.
That just... It keeps the economy, just grinds it to a halt.
You know, it keeps it from growing and creates a, you know, again, fear is a recipe for control.
And that's what they're going to use.
And, of course, you know, people like us, they're going to be speaking out and being skeptical of the war.
We're going to be aiding the evildoers.
Are you ready for that?
Yeah, there'll be no other reason to cancel this.
You're with the terrorists. You know, when these, when Israel starts rolling in and bulldozing and going through, like you talk about the tunnels, Really, I think in that instance, what they're going to be seeing is this activation of sleeper cells all over the world, and then governments like Iran stepping in and backing Hezbollah, backing Hamas.
Then you've got a much, much wider war, and of course Iran being in the sphere of influence of Russia.
This goes together.
This ties in. With what happened in Ukraine.
And of course, the global reset, the reshuffling of the Grand Chess Board, all of that.
And this could be where Gerald Salente is right.
When all else fails, they take you to war.
When you see the loss of the purchasing power of the dollar, the waning American empire, are they looking for some creative destruction?
This is an open question.
I was saying earlier, there's a meme that always floats around and it says, look how much Iran wants war.
They put their country right next to our military bases and it has all the American military bases.
And I remember seeing this as at 22, David, I was in Afghanistan.
And they said, you're going to be security for somebody high-level.
Go out to the tarmac in Kandahar.
So I walked out, and there was only six of us.
I walked out, and I'm getting on the back end of a C-130, and I turn around, and I see a beret with four stars, and it's Tommy Franks.
And I'm standing there, just an E-4 specialist on the tarmac.
There's nobody else around. You can't salute him.
Uh, because I mean, cause that's draw a sniper fire.
You're told not to salute your officer.
So I just stand there. There's Tommy Franks.
He says, well, okay, young man.
He says, where are you from? I said, I'm from Texas.
He says, I am too. And he says, okay, we're going to fly around a bit.
So I flew around with Tommy Franks and we went to all of these different outposts.
You know what? I started to see a common thread.
They were all bordering on Iran and coming up near Iran, you know?
So, I started putting the puzzle together at 22 saying, I think we've got interests here that are beyond Afghanistan.
And it was beyond Iraq as well.
The goal for the neocons, the crown jewel, has always been Iran.
Yeah, that's right. And setting up the Shaw.
People don't...
The collective memory of Americans goes back to the rise of the Ayatollah and the takeover of the U.S. Embassy, but they don't understand what happened before that for 20 years that created that kind of insanity.
And they don't realize just how big...
Iran is. Iran is not a tiny little country.
And so they're biting off a lot with that.
But that is a big part of why we're in Syria as well, right?
I mean, you know, how did we get into Syria?
And again, this new speaker, Mike Johnson, has supported our engagement in Syria as well.
So, you know, he may be a Ukraine skeptic, but he is certainly all in on everything in the Middle East, I think.
I think last week when we spoke and we were talking about Syria and we were talking about the CIA involvement.
And before I got off air, I remember a story.
I talked to this very, very old insider for the oil industry, what you call a wildcat.
It was those guys that were just internationalists go around and would drill and work for oil companies.
And he had a really interesting life.
And I remember just having conversations with him years ago.
And he said, well, you know what?
They all have these oil pipelines in all these different areas, especially Syria.
This is back in 2013.
So you know what they have in common?
You know who owns those pipelines?
He goes, the CIA.
And he knew that the CIA owns through subsidiaries these oil pipelines and wells all throughout Syria.
because he was trying to get drilling rights through one of his companies to go in there.
So I think these things all track back to the military-industrial complex and, of course, intelligence run through international banking.
What we see is surface level.
We're not really included in what's happening.
We just, you know, we see an attack from Hamas on Israel.
It's terrorism. You're supposed to be very frightened.
The images are horrible, and we've got to go to war.
But you're not watching all of the peripheral, all the bigger picture items that are happening.
And this is about energy. This is about control.
So we're about to be thrust into a much wider war if we're not careful.
And God help us. I mean, we have...
You looked at the Congress...
How many votes dissented?
You said 11? There were 10 people.
They were all radical Democrats who hate Israel.
And Thomas Massey. And then Thomas Massey.
I mean, we're in real trouble that somebody can't see through this.
I know. I know.
It's almost unanimous. It's the plan.
It's almost unanimous. They had six people abstain.
I don't know what that was about.
But again, you know, really, Thomas Massey was the only one who gave his reasons, and he had good reasons for not doing it.
But yeah, it is absolutely crazy.
And I remember years ago, at least five years ago, back in 2018, I think it was, as things were happening with Syria on a regular basis, And I remember Gerald Senti and I were talking about, you mentioned the CIA owning the pipelines.
And it's like, look, there's this pipeline that's running across.
One of the reasons we're in Syria is because this pipeline that's running across there and the Russians are running their pipeline in this other area.
They don't want the Russian pipeline.
And that's what this war is about.
Well, since then, the Russians have blown up those other pipelines, you know, the natural gas pipelines and things like that.
I mean, not the Russians, but the Americans.
The CIA has blown it up. And so, you know, they've blown up those pipelines, and they're there to stop the other ones from going through.
That's one of the reasons why Syria and Russia were working together.
So it really is about the pipelines, and it really is about CIA wanting to have a monopoly on these pipelines.
I think it's kind of interesting that they work so hard over this, and they have the wars over this, and they keep telling us, oh, we're going to get all of our power from windmills and solar panels for the grid.
They obviously don't believe it.
It's kind of like watching Obama buy his mansions on the seashore.
He doesn't believe we're going to have global warming that's going to flood those areas.
And I don't think that these people believe that there's any such thing as peak oil or that we're going to be moving away from oil either.
We're not. And then somebody's done the calculation somewhere.
Yeah. Foregoing volume and cheap energy and economic growth for the price of a barrel of crude.
I mean, I think that they say, well, if we can get $200 barrel oil or higher, it's actually better for us.
We have less exploration, less overhead, we make more money, and of course we get to create the economic circumstances for universal basic income.
Mm-hmm. Which sets the stage for CBDC. I think those things, these all flow together.
I mean, the top 1% of 1% is not interested in lower prices, they're not interested in lower taxes, they're not interested in free markets.
I think that's pretty clear.
So it doesn't matter to them that there's higher prices.
And they're going to drive the American economy into the ditch.
But again, the last, what, year, two years, the economy has been held hostage by high interest rates.
They don't care at all about the American economy.
They care about the strength of the dollar, it being used as the world's reserve currency, because this is a currency war, beginning with currency wars, and of course into trade wars, and into actual kinetic warfare.
That's what we want to avoid, but the reason I'm in the precious metals business, and I'm so adamant about people taking a second look at the system itself, you know, the stock market, you know, there's an article up, From NBC, it was like three reasons that you might want to own gold or it might outperform the stock market.
Yeah, it's going to outperform a lot of things.
The system itself is built on fake.
And it's not built on production anymore.
It's not built on profit anymore.
So I think that the world is about to see a massive shift in value, the transvaluation of actual real value into something else.
I think gold will be the winner.
There'll be things like Bitcoin.
I mean, Bitcoin's back up to close to 35,000.
There's lots of rumors of ETFs and things coming down.
I don't know really what that's going to do, but I do think just the ability to have the outside of the fiat currency central bank system in a time of war It's something people ought to take a look at.
Well, you know, Jamie Dimon, the biggest bank, J.P. Morgan, is taking a look at what is going on.
And when he talked about interest rates as well as what else is happening, he kind of downplayed.
He says, well, the whole curve goes up by 100 basis points, which would be a full 1% interest rate.
He said, I would be prepared for it.
He says, I don't know if it's going to happen, but I look at what we're seeing today, and it's more like the 1970s, he said.
We've got a lot of spending, and a lot of this is going to be wasted.
But the other thing about the 1970s was the energy shock that went through the country for whatever reason.
And so that's what he's looking at.
He's looking at massive spending, and whatever the Fed is going to do with this stuff, he says massive spending, it's the energy shock.
He said... I support ESG principles, but criticize the government playing whack-a-mole.
So there's no concerted strategy for what?
For energy. He says you can't build pipelines to reduce coal emissions.
They shut that down. You can't get the permits to build solar and wind and things like that.
So we better get our act together.
But of course, the plan is that we own nothing.
We go nowhere. We have no energy.
We have no food. We have no travel.
We have no manufacturing. I mean, this is really the plan.
This is really what they want to do, isn't it?
Well, yes, and I found it odd.
I think I brought this up about a year ago.
Anybody else notice that the head of the largest bank in the United States keeps saying there's going to be an economic superstorm?
Yeah. Have you ever heard a banker or a bankster, have you ever heard somebody that high level not cheerlead for the economy?
Something's up with Jamie Damon.
Every time he does it.
Every time he speaks, he does that.
Yeah. Yes, and it's over and over again.
And I wonder, he seems to be a lone voice on this.
I don't know, again, most of this is some kind of psyop, you know, and he might just have some sort of inside view or taking care of select clients or letting them play the market.
You know, he also, early on in Bitcoin in 2018, I think, you know, he said that Bitcoin was basically said something like...
Buffett said that it was rat poison and then the next day there was a sell-off and then I think a lot of his traders bought it up.
So this could be an inside deal and just using his rhetoric and his position.
But he's right.
And there's something to this.
It's baked into the system that we're not supposed to go anywhere or have mobility.
They're bringing about Agenda 2030.
They're bringing about Agenda 21.
This is the sustainability program, United Nations, Great Reset, whatever you want to call it, New World Order.
This is about consolidation.
You get consolidation through creative destruction.
It's build back better.
In order for something to be built back better, it has to be destroyed first.
This is really what this is all about.
I pray that we're not headed towards some sort of kinetic conflict and lines being drawn, but it certainly looks that way.
Where do you turn to economically when there's so much fear, uncertainty, and doubt when there's warfare?
Again, people turn to gold.
I think that's what we're watching. The bigger story here is what's going to happen to the dollar, what's going to happen economically, the price of oil, and I think we're going to see nothing but higher prices moving forward.
Again, the 70s were a testing ground, a proving ground for For what happens in a fiat currency environment.
I mean, Nixon took us off the gold standard in August of 1971.
Gold was $35 an ounce.
I know I talk about this all the time, but, you know, again, into the 1970s, gold's close to $800 an ounce.
But is that because the gold was a massive, great investment?
Well, somewhat. And we couldn't even legally own gold until Gerald Ford took office in 1974.
Right. So, again, it was illegal to own gold.
Franklin Roosevelt signed that into law in April of 1933.
The gold went from $35 an ounce in 1971 to $800 an ounce at the end of the 1970s.
And that's because of the loss of purchasing power of the dollar.
It's inflation. The 1970s were massive inflation.
And you had Paul Volcker, who's head of the Federal Reserve, raised interest rates to the teens.
Interest rates generally are brought in and used as a way to counter inflation.
What we're seeing now, and I think people ought to pay attention to, David and I talk about this every week, Gold isn't really going anywhere when they raise rates.
This is the first time.
Even the mainstream is starting to pick up on this.
Why is it not moving downward?
And the reason it isn't is because the world is moving on and we're starting to see the loss of the world's reserve currency status in the United States.
And that could change. There could be a reshuffling because of war, but even that won't I don't think prop it up indefinitely.
I think we're talking about very short-term boost in whatever the dollar is.
I think the smart money right now and those who are really looking at this with a skeptical eye are trying to park somewhere with whatever wealth they have into assets that can sustain this.
I agree. Let me read a couple of comments people put here about Wise Wolf.
Here's Paleo Armory.
He said, I ordered a one-ounce silver credit card.
I keep it in my wallet, and you can cut it with scissors.
Yeah, that's really cool. I like those things where you can break the silver, you've got the same type of thing with gold as well, don't you?
Yeah, you can get what are called Combi bars from us, and Valcambi makes them, or Swiss.
You can get them in little one-gram break-apart bars.
So they're called Combi bars, and we do that with Wolfpack.
I buy them by the 100-gram sheet.
So when you join Wolfpack, instead of you paying the premium, the too high of a premium for just one gram gold in a package, We do the heavy lifting and buy it in bulk for you, so we actually save you money by doing it that way.
So you get the one gram, we repackage it for you, but you don't have to pay the premium.
We'll usually save you a pretty significant amount over buying it individually.
That's great. That's great. Jason Barker, thank you for the tip, Jason.
I appreciate that. He says, I love Tony and his amazing staff.
Is there anywhere to get Wise Wolf Apparel?
Yes, Jason.
I've got a meeting today on that.
We're about to launch a new store and I've got a lot of designs and I've got some help with that.
By the holidays, I promise by the holidays we'll have all kinds of great gear and hoodies and beanies and t-shirts and all kinds of cool stuff.
And Wolfpack stuff. I'm having a new Wolfpack logo drawn up right now.
Oh, that's cool. That's cool.
And I've got a question for you.
Well, actually, it was a question sent to me, but I think I'd like to hear your answer to it as well.
This is from For Love of the Road.
He says... What do we do if they outlaw all forms of currency besides their precious CBDC? Is that even a possibility, in your opinion?
I don't know. Seems like that would be a step too far, in my opinion.
Better take the guns before they take the cash, I'm thinking.
But I think that they will eventually do that.
I think that's the plan.
I mean, they want to get there iteratively, right?
Do it from the inside. Do it with chaos and disruption.
And you do it iteratively. And so I think that is the end goal, that they want to try to get rid of everything.
What's your opinion about that?
I think that would be the goal on an eventual timeline.
Lucky for us, a lot of the grassroots is a lot more awake to these issues than they ever have been.
Local and state level, as you've talked to many people in that area, are already starting to work on state banks that control precious metals.
I think it's going to be very hard for them.
What makes it easier, and the worry should be, just how easy it is to get people pushed into war.
You go and look on the threads on Twitter right now, and those are people who should be on our side and awake to being skeptical of government power or cheerleading in this bloodlust for war.
That could help the Fed or the federal government continue to consolidate power.
So centralization is really the enemy here.
If they can continue to consolidate power and override the states and bring in CBDC, then we're in real trouble.
Although I would say, you know, Franklin Roosevelt signed that anti-gold hoarding act, whatever that meant, to turn in your gold coins, and if you know anything about the history...
The United States and the gold coins, all that gold went to Basel, Switzerland, to the Bank of International Settlements, if you didn't know.
That was always the bankster plan, was to get the gold out of the hands of the American people.
And of course, they raised the price of gold after that.
But it's kind of interesting, David.
I buy those coins all the time.
They didn't all go to Basel, Switzerland.
I have tons here.
You can buy them by the bag full.
So people didn't turn them in.
I mean, some did, but not everybody.
And I would say they still left it for dentists and jewelers.
Gold was still around, even in communist countries.
I mean, the commies would say they hated gold, especially in Mao's China.
But they would go out and try to find it.
So even the communists know they have to use gold eventually for some kind of wealth to pull off an operation.
So it's never going to be completely out of civilization.
They can't totally outlaw it.
I mean, they've done a great job with fentanyl and cocaine and heroin, right?
They're never going to be able to keep everything out of the marketplace and with people.
It may not be legal, but you'll have people trading in it, in my opinion.
And, of course, here in our country, as you point out, the war on drugs for 50 years, they haven't been able to stamp out anything.
And... That's the only experience we've had, really, in a black market.
But in other countries, it's very common for there to be black markets and money and all the rest of this stuff.
I was talking to the economist from Chile, who's friends with Javier Malay in Argentina, and he wrote the book, I think, 15 Lessons in Street Economics or something like that.
But anyway...
Axel said, was talking about how they use cash there when they've got rampant inflation.
They've got 138% inflation is the official number, and the bank has raised interest rates to 133%.
I mean, still, they're not raising interest rates above the inflation rate, but it's crazy, and people have already gone to the American dollar as cash, and they call people up, and they have them show up, you know, special couriers who will show up to Get you to check into a nice hotel.
He shows up with his metal box.
You know, they have guards around them to carry the stuff.
That's a more formalized thing.
But in most third world countries, there's a big black market that's there.
They call it a blue market in Argentina.
But there's a big black market, always has been, for a lot of different things.
And it can be there for money.
I know during the Depression, You still had a lot of local communities created their own currency, and they would stamp some local currency.
Some of them did it with wood, and people were using that as a means of exchange and barter and that type of deal.
And so there's going to be solutions like that.
They're not going to be able to completely handcuff us with all of this stuff unless they can round us up at the point of a bayonet and put us into a 15-minute city.
And that's when things get really bad when they do that.
But I think they're going to try to do things.
They're going to gradually narrow this.
We see that already with crypto, they've got to get crypto out as well.
It's not just gold.
And they're really more focused on crypto right now in terms of coming after it.
And so the way that's looking is you've got the IRS has got 300 pages of regulations about how they want everybody to do this know your customer stuff and dox us to the government if we get involved in cryptocurrency a million different ways.
And so the question is, is that going to go through?
It was passed by Congress, and the IRS is putting in the devilish details on this.
But that's the question.
What are they going to do? They're preparing that.
They're doing it step by step.
They want to shut down crypto, and they'll eventually try to shut down gold, but they won't be able to do, as you pointed out, I don't think.
Well, you know, in this regulation, you were talking to Eric Peters yesterday about the auto industry.
You can't really start a car company, not really, because of the massive regulation.
Where did that regulation come from?
It came from car companies.
They want to keep anybody from competing with them.
And that's, I mean, I don't know my history like Eric does, but I'm pretty sure that's where it would come from.
Same thing with crypto.
We were part of some of the first Bitcoin ATMs.
I don't own them anymore. The reason I don't own them anymore is because the regulation got so steep and you had to pay for so much just to even bank.
It was a fortune.
And so you can't do that.
This is coming from the bigger banks who want to control the crypto space.
And so, yeah, crypto will get more and more consolidated into the hands of, at least being able to buy it will be consolidated in the hands of the big banks.
But I don't think they can totally control that either, David.
I've got a comment here from Duke Newcomb.
It says, Tony, stocking up on Wolfpack for a year has been my best financial move since AMC mooned.
I guess maybe he bought AMC stock and shorted him or something, or shorted him or something like that.
It's really great to hear that.
That's good, yeah. Alan Vijay says, I got the Wise Wolf mini flashlight.
Oh yeah. I got some really cool keychains.
They have a little magnifying glass and they have a little LED light.
And you can also check, I don't know if you guys know this, you can look at it, you can check the validity of diamonds that way with a little LED, the way it refracts back and check it out online.
But I got those little keychains for everybody and We're adding little things like that.
It's just kind of a personalized touch for the experience of Wolfpack.
But yeah, if you haven't joined Wolfpack, go to davidknight.gold, click the tab that says join Wolfpack, and check it out.
We've got anybody that upgrades or joins, free constitutional silver.
I've got a list in here that my staff's keeping of anybody in the last month, and I'm about to repackage and resend out a lot of constitutional silver.
That's your... Your dollars, half dollars, quarters, and dimes, anything before 1965.
So go check out Wolfpack.
We need more members. The more people that join, the better prices I can get.
That's right. That's right. Yeah.
Strength in numbers. And that's the way it is with Liberty and many other things.
Well, thank you so much for joining us, Tony.
I know you've got to get going, and we've enjoyed talking to you a little bit longer today than we usually do, but that's great.
And it is a very difficult time that we're looking at right now, no doubt about it.
And so... You need to be making moves on your own to defensive moves, and I think one of the best things you can do is gold and silver.
And the best guy to do that with is Tony Arterman at Wise Wolf Gold.
And thank you so much for setting up davidknight.gold.
Thank you, Tony. Appreciate it.
Thank you, Dave. Appreciate you.
We're going to go to a break, and I'm going to play for you what Michael Yearden, who was an early warner about the vaccines, the guy who was the vice president for Pfizer, he was warning everybody from the very beginning about these vaccines.
And now his major concern is CBDC and, of course, the global digital ID. Here is Michael Yearden.
What they're going to do next, I promise you, I just know it, they're going to impose a digital ID on everybody, decline it, Decline it!
You do not need a digital eye-zine to live your peaceful life.
Evidence? The last hundreds of years.
You do not need it.
They need you to have it.
Decline it! What else have they got?
Cooking! Central bank digital currencies.
Yes, it's very different from your bank card because it's a real-time transaction that looks for where you are and what you're buying before it says yes or no.
Your current bank card only asks, have you got the money?
So when they introduce central bank digital currencies, they'll tell you that, oh no, cash will run alongside it.
No, I'm confident they're going to find a way of removing cash.
Use cash at every possible opportunity.
Decline business with anyone who won't accept it.
Now this is going to involve you in inconvenience, just like declining digital ID is going to involve you in inconvenience.
If you don't accept the inconvenience, you've stepped into what I believe will be the human slaughterhouse.
I think they plan to take digital tyrannical control of everybody and then kill those people.
That fits the data better than anything else you've been told.
So if I'm wrong and you follow me, you'll get laughed at.
That's not so bad.
If you believe the government narrative and I'm right, you'll lose your freedom and property of your life.
I'm going to stop there. Unlike most revolutions, where the people rise against a real economic oppression, in our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle.
Hear, hear, hear! It is, however, not nearly so abstract as the young gentleman supposes.
The issue involved here is one of monopoly.
Today, the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country.
Tomorrow it will be something else.
I love you.
I love you.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Alright, and I want to talk a little bit more about the CBDC stuff and where this is all heading.
And we can see already what the bankers are doing.
We've had during the Obama administration, remember Operation Chokepoint, they said we're going to have these banks are going to shut down anybody who deals with any gun retailers, any gun manufacturers, we're going to debank them.
And now, you know, they pull back against that.
But then what they did was to show that that's not dead yet.
You had both J.P. Morgan, the biggest bank, and Bank of America, which is number two or number three, leaned on Intuit, which a lot of people have for their accounting, especially small businesses and stuff like that, leaned on them.
And one of them, I think, I don't remember, one of the banks said, we don't want Intuit to do any business with the manufacturers.
And the other one said, we don't want you to do any business with the retailers of guns.
And Intuit admitted it.
J.P. Morgan admitted it.
Bank of America did not admit it.
Bank of America has even been worse in terms of spying on people.
So we know the bankers are in on this.
They've got a political agenda.
They're working hand in glove with the efforts to censor people and to control our economy in the same way that the big tech companies like Adobe, as I pointed out yesterday, Microsoft, which is putting that coalition together.
The people are putting together the biggest CPU manufacturer, Intel, and of course, ARM and all the others that use that architecture, all coming together for this coalition to figure out who created whatever it is that you're going to create, whether it's a meme or an article or video all coming together for this coalition to figure out who created whatever Figure out who created it, mark it so they can stop you from ever publishing anything again personally.
And so we see this in the UK, bankers gloating and celebrating about the fact that they were able to debank Nigel Farage.
And it's kind of interesting to watch how this thing has evolved.
When he said, this is what they're doing, they said, no, it's not what we're doing.
And eventually they admitted, okay, yeah, that's what we're doing.
But it wasn't anything deliberate.
It wasn't malicious or whatever.
And now as they keep looking at it, they have now gotten emails showing these bankers at the bank in the UK is called NatWest, I like National West.
I've been exposed for gloating and mocking Nigel Farage after his bank accounts were shut down, bragging that they had, quote, single-handedly driven him out of the country.
Staff have been shown to characterize Mr.
Farage as, quote, an awful human being and vile, unquote, as well as claiming that he had, quote, dodgy Russian connections, a total lie.
And, again, this goes back to the original Russian collusion nonsense of the 2016 election.
One NatWest employee said, and this is from emails that have been obtained and reported on by the Telegraph in the UK, Have you seen Nigel Farage's Twitter?
No one will bank him now.
Have we single-handedly driven Nigel Farage out of the country?
No. Then after the BBC falsely reported that his accounts were solely shut for financial reasons, a claim that came from a former NatWest boss, Dame Allison Rose.
She's a dame. That cracks me up whenever.
That's a title, of course, like Sir, right?
Sir so-and-so.
She said... One employee said, well, I hope that knocked him down a peg or two.
Referencing a previous assault on Farage, another staff member said, I'd throw a milkshake at him if I was approached to open an account for him because somebody at one event had thrown a milkshake at him when he was in a suit.
That type of deal.
And so now, after all this has surfaced and been reported on by mainstream media even, he demands that these bank staff be suspended after this.
Especially because there is about a 40% ownership in this particular bank by the taxpayers, by the government, if you will.
And so, documents revealed and boasting about driving him out of the country.
And so, interestingly enough, this woman, Dame Allison Rose, this back and forth led to her being resigned.
They didn't throw Nigel Farage out of the country, but they did throw her out of the bank.
But don't worry, she'll land safely with her golden parachute.
She falsely told a journalist that Mr.
Farage's views had not been a factor in the loss of his account.
That has now been shown to be a lie.
A lying dame.
You can never trust a lying dame.
This week, the board of the bank, which is 38.6% owned by the taxpayer, will meet to discuss her exit package.
There you go, her golden parachute.
How big a golden parachute is she going to get at taxpayer expense?
It truly is revolting, isn't it?
And as all this is happening...
We look at MasterCard.
MasterCard has been there at the very beginning trying to push ID, central bank, digital currency, tracking, and everybody.
I mean, it's very different from Visa.
MasterCard has been at the forefront of these partnerships.
And now they've got a project that they're pushing to governments to use their project to track people's health and their vaccination status, among other things.
And I found it interesting...
They call it the Community Pass Project.
So very similar to what you hear me in the Common Man commercial.
I talk about the Common Pass.
You know, the World Economic Forum had their Common Project.
And out of that, they came up with a Common Pass, which was the prototype for the vaccine passports and all the rest of the stuff.
And now MasterCard is calling theirs the Community Pass.
And their executive vice president at MasterCard claims that this will be used to integrate marginalized communities.
Oh, we're just going to do it to help people.
This is the same stuff we've seen from Bill Gates all the way through all of this.
And, of course, his organization that he created quite a while back, ID2020, where we're going to get a global ID for everybody.
We're going to start the process in 2020, which they did.
And now MasterCard is actually working with Bill Gates' ID 2020.
They're going to make the digital ID and wallet in these poor countries in Sub-Saharan Africa or the Asia-Pacific areas.
You get a digital ID and a wallet from the government that MasterCard will be the ones to put this out.
And isn't it amazing?
I mean, we see all of these multinational corporations, these billionaires, whether you're talking about Bill Gates or We're talking about Zuckerberg with his Libra coin.
We're talking about MasterCard with their Community Pass project.
Or Sam Altman with his WorldCoin.
They all want to be the guy who is going to be picked.
To run this thing, right?
And that's another reason why all these car companies and everybody else fold in on this ESG. Yes, we will do whatever you want because we want to be one of the one or two or maybe three people, corporations that are allowed to run this whole thing.
And so they're going to use this digital ID and wallet.
It will, as Reclaim the Net says, it will allow them access to services such as government benefits.
So it's going to bribe them. Bribe them.
That's what Gates did in India with the Adhar system.
Everybody take a number.
And we'll give you government services and food and health care.
The emphasis of this VP for MasterCard, her name is Tara Nathan, her emphasis on using offline digital channels to supposedly empower marginalized individuals raises eyebrows, says Reclaim the Net.
Is this another case of a multinational company trying to sell its tech solutions to unsuspecting communities under the guise of altruism?
Well, I mean, this is, they're selling their products to the government, which has an agenda to, as you heard Michael Yearden say, to kill us all.
You know, you go back, Tony and I were talking, you know, about the depopulation agenda of war and how that could help them with their great reset and the rest of this stuff.
Of course, Paul Ehrlich, who wrote the population bomb that, you know, and he was one of the drivers for the first Earth Day in 1970.
So, you know, he wrote his population bomb in the late 60s.
And I've played for you the clips of him saying, you know, we've got to get rid of a lot of people.
Maybe one of the ways that we can do that is war, but, you know, maybe we can just sterilize people and other things like that and reduce having kids and things.
Maybe we can do it gradually and peacefully, or if that doesn't work, we can just have a big war.
So the VP, Nathan, Was eager to elaborate on the various components of Community Pass.
She's broken it down into at least three right now.
Listen to this. Farm Pass.
Well, there you go. For your food.
Wellness Pass.
For your health care.
Commerce Pass.
To make sure that you can, you know, give you permission to buy and sell.
Seems like I read that somewhere before.
You know, you gotta have this number to buy and sell anything.
Yeah, 2,000 years ago.
Revelation. The Wellness Pass initiative seems particularly odd, says Reclaim the Net.
It is positioned as a system to monitor vaccine rollouts.
Oh, well, because that's the only thing these people talk about when they talk about health.
Your vaccines.
Well, it's actually anti-wellness, is how we ought to do it.
These people are anti-Christ and they are anti-wellness with their wellness pass, their vaccine pass.
Let's track about how many vaccines that you've had.
Their goal is to expand the reach of Community Pass to over 30 million people by 2027.
Digital identities under the pretense of progress could well turn into tools for invasive surveillance.
Yes, of course, that's right. And they sat down and reclaimed their recent ID2020 certification.
See, Gates' ID2020, they kicked all this stuff out in 2020.
Eventually, they want everybody everywhere to To have an ID, and he's also got the IA2030, which is his immunization agenda 2030.
Everyone, everywhere, every vaccine, every age.
And so he's got a certification program with ID2020. And MasterCard is working with him on that as well.
Jason Barker says, this is quickly moving to the mark of the beast.
Yes, it is. I did a report on this where they are trying to make unbankable people become bankable.
They need to do that in order to make sure that everybody will get their mark.
And when they say marginalized or undeserved communities, what they really mean is people who deal primarily in cash.
Yeah, that's right. Absolutely right, Jason.
And again, you want to see that report...
TheNightsOfTheStorm.com is where you'll see where you can find Jason's program, Foxhole Report, Angry Tigers, Snake and Tiger Report, Financial Report.
Of course, they do Nights of the Storm together.
They've got a list there of all the different, a lot of different programs, including this one and the Times and where you can find them.
Guard Goldsmith is Liberty Conspiracy.
All of those are there.
Great place to check the schedules.
So, we're going to take a quick break, and we're going to come back in just a moment.
By the way, NN says, and thank you for the tip, NN. I appreciate that.
It says, ID2020.org lists many partners.
UN Agenda 2030, the store says they want everyone on Earth to have a digital ID right on the website.
That's right. Making no secret about this agenda.
It was another thing that made it so obvious because they put that stuff out there before they rolled out this thing.
That's why I said it was such a betrayal to see that happening from Trump.
It's like, you know, and again, the question is, did he not know?
Was he that stupid? Or did he know and he betrayed us?
I think he betrayed us because he's continued to do it long after this stuff was done.
Now, Jason says, yes, and they put it out right there for everybody to see.
But we are called tinfoil hat people, if we point that out.
Well, we're going to take a quick break.
And when we come back, I've got several things to talk about here.
We've got some big moves really being made in cars.
And it's kind of interesting how a small group of people is actually making this happen.
Now, they're pulling back these automobile companies, a relatively small group.
We'll talk about that. We'll be right back.
.
����
���� In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Love these comments here. About the MasterCard ID, GeorgeBoy1142 says, hence the name MasterCard.
Yeah, well, why do they have a problem with that?
You know, I mean, you've got the realtors out there, these woke realtors, say, we can't call it the master bedroom anymore because that implies slavery somehow.
It's like, well, the MasterCard thing is literal slavery.
They write it right there as well.
They're your master right there.
The card is our master.
As they say, it's Pizza Planet.
NJC4007, I'm a Lone Wolf member.
Signed up under David. Love it.
Thanks, Tony and Dave. Well, thank you.
Appreciate that. And Trump Burger Forever says, makes you feel like Scrooge McDuck with all these coins.
Yeah, just put them in the basement and you can dive into them like Scrooge McDuck.
I had this big pile of coins and he would dive into it like it's the plastic balls that you see.
Audi, Modern Retro Radio.
When people advocate ending the drug war, we're not advocating people openly doing drugs on the street.
We are advocating the end of police violating people's Fourth Amendment rights, planting drugs on them, and the rest of the stuff.
That's true. You know, we saw that happen.
With alcohol prohibition, it corrupted the police.
It corrupted due process.
It corrupted so many things. But fortunately, at the time, we did still have people who actively participated as fully informed jurists, and they were shutting that down because they saw the abuse.
But even with alcohol, they didn't come after the end users as much as they did with drugs.
That was part of the strategy that flipped around During the Reagan administration to come after the end users, but it hasn't worked.
We still have the drug issue, and we could say arguably that it's worse because just as we saw with alcohol prohibition, people turn to more potent forms of whatever it is that people have prohibited.
So you saw before alcohol prohibition, you saw primarily use of beer and wine, and then they turned to hard alcohol.
And what are we seeing now? We're seeing, you know, selective breeding or genetic modification, I don't know which it is, that's created very, very potent strains and dangerous strains of marijuana.
But we got all kinds of new drugs, things like fentanyl, things like Trank.
They're going to constantly be coming up with new stuff like that.
And that's a characteristic.
That is a, if you want to call it, an adverse effect.
uh, for prohibition.
So you wind up with a much worse version of the substances and things like that, a more corrupt government.
And, uh, because, uh, law enforcement is not addressing able to address what is a spiritual and medical issue.
Uh, we have to address that in a different way.
And, um, but I always mention it whenever I think about that.
I always told my sons that about the prohibition stuff, You get more effective forms of it, and they would always say, well.
I said, you know, that's going to happen with guns, too.
And they said, cool. No, it's not going to be cool when people have very, very potent weapons because they've outlawed other guns.
They're going to come up with stuff, and there's going to be no limit to human ingenuity in terms of coming up with that.
MJ says, Bud Light, it makes me laugh every time they do something to get their market back.
Yeah, they're a bit of a joke, aren't they?
And then a couple of comments here about Disney and sorcery.
ON61 says the magic of Disney is they put lipstick on a pig and people don't realize that they're looking at a pig or kissing a pig, if you will, even.
And Bob of Atlantis says Disney is sorcery, programming the minds of the youth to hate their parents.
Yeah, I agree. That's one of the reasons why they had a big issue.
With a parental rights bill.
The other thing that Disney sells very cleverly is, and it's something that all of Hollywood sells, but especially Disney.
Follow your heart.
Follow your heart. Let your conscience be your guide.
Well, you should never violate your conscience, but your conscience is not always a great guide.
It could have been seared with a hot iron.
From repeated abuse, or it could have been misformed and mistrained and things like that.
You need an absolute standard, and that's why we look at a biblical worldview that provides us with that absolute standard in the same way that the Constitution provides us with an unchanging.
It can be changed.
There is a process to amend that, but it is a fixed standard that's driven into the ground.
And when people violate that, even if, like this new speaker, they call themselves a constitutionalist, well, then obey it yourself.
This is from Robert, and he says, I was thinking when these World Economic Forum elite types, what they really need is an electric private jet, especially when taking those long transatlantic flights.
Ha! I like that a lot.
It's kind of like a long walk off of a short pier.
A long trip with a long transatlantic flight with a battery with it.
But I thought it was very interesting.
We talked about this some yesterday with Eric Peters.
The fact that you're seeing these big car companies pull back for a number of reasons...
From the EV agenda that has been pushed on them so heavily by government.
Again, they want to do everything they can to please the government.
That's their customer, not you.
Their customer is the government.
And they want to do everything they can to support ESG, environmental societal governance, because they want to be the mobility company that will provide you with a Johnny Cash, Johnny Cash, Johnny Cab autonomous taxi.
You know, give me the franchise for that.
And so they want to be the handmaid of this government program.
And yet... I was really heartened by this.
You know, I have had bad experiences with unions.
I typically don't like that kind of collectivism.
The unions have had, for the most part, they've been very socialist or even Marxist in their political aspect.
I was in the Teamsters Union when I was a musician, and I felt that it was a true exploitation.
I felt, you know, we've got government out there, and government is taxing us and exploiting us, and we have all these rules and taxes and fees and everything that we have to pay to the Musicians Union and the rest of the stuff, and I just...
It's like just another parasitic organization.
That was not, by the way, the attitude of our parents' generation.
As a matter of fact, I had some of my friends who were musicians and were getting paid because that was at a time when you still had live music.
And they had, at least two of them, I had fathers who had been musicians as well.
And, you know, they had been around, you know, 40s and 50s and stuff.
And they said, no, the musicians union really saved us.
It was a great thing at that point in time.
It may have gotten out of control by now.
But it was a good thing at that point in time.
So we understand different times and different aspects of it.
But there is a big socialist organized crime aspect to it.
There is also exploitation.
And when you go on strike for this stuff, you usually wind up losing money because...
Even though you get a raise out of the end of it or you get some things like that, it usually doesn't cover the money that you lost during the strike.
So, in general, I'm not a union supporter.
And I say all that because I was really kind of heartened to see these people come together and see the bigger picture for once.
And the bigger picture is, if you're going to do electric vehicles, we're all out of work.
And that pressure, combined with the market reality that General Motors and these other companies, General Motors and Ford and Stellantis, as we talked about yesterday with Eric Peters, they're on a path to bankruptcy because nobody can afford to, even if they wanted to, they can't afford to buy these expensive EV vehicles that the government is mandating.
And so there is a kind of a, we've got to face the reality of this.
GM and Ford and Stellantis and these other companies, they're not going to be able to hang around in order to be the Johnny Cab companies because they're going to be out of business before that happens if they don't pull back.
And so, you know, like I said, a relatively small group of people, and I think it is important, you know, I think we do need in some way, we don't necessarily need to have a big union organization that can become another predator on us, but we need to somehow come together.
As G. Edward Griffin, when I interviewed him years ago, he said, We need to learn how to act collectively for individual liberty.
These people acted collectively.
Few determined people. 5,000 auto workers shut down GM's biggest, most profitable plant in Arlington, Texas.
I mean, over and over again, as we look at them forcing us into, you know, one thing after the other, we have to refuse at some point to do that.
And just as Michael Yarden was saying, it's going to be inconvenient for you to use cash.
You're going to get laughed at.
And, you know, if we're wrong about all this stuff, well, then, you know, you're going to be laughed at.
But if we're right about it, they're trying to kill you.
And so at some point, we've got to say, well, I'm not going to go along with that anymore, whatever the cost.
The biggest, most profitable plant in Arlington, Texas, shut down 5,000 American auto workers, joining more than 40,000 UAW members in their ongoing strike against the big three.
And of course, why was this so profitable?
Well, their Arlington, Texas assembly plant builds the Chevy Tahoe, the Chevy Suburban, the GMC Yukon, the Cadillac Escalade.
These are GM's most profitable vehicles.
What do they have in common?
Well, they're the big SUVs, right?
And that's where they make their money.
And so... These people strategically targeted them at their most profitable sites, and they did that over and over again.
The walkout at GM's biggest plant comes after 6,800 auto workers shut down Stellantis' most profitable plant in Sterling Heights, Michigan, and 8,700 auto workers shut down Ford's most profitable plant in Louisville,
Kentucky. As a result of the ongoing strike, GM CEO Mary Barra and other executives told investors that they are abandoning their goal to produce 400,000 electric vehicles from 2022 through mid-2024, among other EV priorities.
See, that's the bigger picture.
It isn't, can we get another dollar raise or whatever it is, or $10 raise.
I mean, with inflation and all the rest of it, they're not even going to have a job.
And they finally got to that realization.
And we're not going to have a life, we're not going to have food, housing, transportation, anything, if we don't somehow find a way to come together and peacefully say, we're not participating in any of this stuff anymore.
Barra said GM has got work to do in order to hit its low-to-mid single-digit earnings before interest and taxes, margin target by 2025.
GM's decision to delay retooling of a large factory in Orion Township, Michigan, to build electric pickup trucks.
We'll save them $1.5 billion in capital investments next year.
So we're going to pull back from that because that's an investment of $1.5 billion into something that people don't want to buy.
We're going to pull back on this, not make that investment to build something that Biden wants, but nobody else wants.
What a novel idea.
You're going to focus on profits instead of ESG and what the World Economic Forum and what Biden wants.
Who wants this stuff?
Well, it's only the politicians and Klaus Schwab.
The Biden IRA, the Infrastructure Reduction Act, promises to shower billions in taxpayer money on automakers via EV tax credits, but auto workers and UAW leadership have repeatedly warned that not only is that money not trickling down to them, but one auto worker on strike says, I think EVs are going to wipe us out.
They don't need spark plugs.
They need oil filters and many other things.
If we don't have those parts, I feel like we don't have a whole lot to do.
Well, that's the plan. They do want to wipe you out.
They do want to eliminate private vehicles, including electric vehicles.
And so GM is pulling back.
And Honda and GM, who had a partnership that was going on to come together and build and develop electric vehicles, they have both said, we're going to scrap those plans to develop electric vehicles.
As I said yesterday, winning on a lot of different fronts here.
After studying this for a year, we decided that it would be difficult as a business.
So, at the moment, we are ending development of affordable EV, said Honda CEO. Well, guess what?
That's not rocket science.
We all know that it's not profitable.
It's everywhere, written in big, big letters.
The decision to shut down the deal...
It comes amid a United Auto Workers strike in the U.S. against three major automakers.
And it's now gone on for more than a month.
But it's not about that. It's about the EV and the fact that there's no profit in it.
And people can't afford it.
The EV conversion is also a problem in areas where the Democrats are soft on crime because there's a lot of vandalism of these charging stations.
Especially the very expensive cables that are used to charge them.
Those are being ripped off.
And even people are having this stolen from their private homes.
As the number of EVs on the road increases, so does the need for reliable charging stations.
However, cases of charging cords being cut or stolen, essential parts can render stations inoperable for days.
In February, a new Tesla supercharger station in California was destroyed just days after opening.
The stations had a total of eight high-speed V3 supercharger stalls, and every single cable was stolen.
And when you look at this, a lot of these places, as one person was doing their journey and they said, well, this just didn't work.
We went to a lot of places and they didn't work.
And then some other ones were some areas that it took us to.
And these were really dodgy areas.
We didn't want to hang around the middle of the night.
And what looked to be possibly a high crime area.
I mean, you're going to be hanging around there for 30 minutes or more.
Not safe.
What about the personal danger in all these things?
Theft of pricey cables used to charge EVs has been happening from owners' driveways as well.
Because a lot of people are afraid to put them in their homes because it could cause a fire.
NBC reported that an EV driver in July had his charging cord stolen from his LA driveway.
And it cost him $2,700 for a replacement.
This is why they're stealing this.
And again, it's in these places like L.A. where they don't punish crime like this, property crime especially.
So Ford has the best-selling vehicle.
I think it still is, the F-150 trucks.
And yet their electric version, sales have plunged by 46%.
So again, you know, it's not rocket science to understand that nobody wants this thing.
And so GM was going to spend $1.5 billion to tool up an electric truck plant, and maybe they looked at the fact that Ford, even with its popular F-150, Sales have plunged 46% for that, for the Lightning electric pickup.
And again, they're trying to compete on price with Tesla.
Tesla's got lower costs because they've been in this longer.
Ford's CEO, of course, famously back in August, Took the trip.
Said it was really with his EV. Tried to do it across country.
Said this ain't ready for prime time yet.
He said it's a really good reality check of the challenges of what our customers go through and the importance of fast charging and having charging stations, but we don't have them.
You know, they made a deal with Tesla, but again, there's all these plug-in compatibilities.
So, you know, and of course, the other person who took the trip and he was having so many problems, he wound up just having it towed in and then renting a gas-powered vehicle to finish his vacation.
Look at Lucid.
This is one of the, even with the hypercars, they're really super expensive cars.
Lucid is losing $338,000 per vehicle.
It is, they said, an unsustainable business.
You think? Maybe they'll make it up in volume, you know.
And they actually say that.
One of the Bloomberg intelligence, I don't think this guy is too intelligent, Lucid may burn $338,000 per vehicle this year, an increase over the $325,000 they lost just months ago per vehicle.
Demonstrating how its unsustainable business model requires, here's what it requires, significant scaling.
So you've got to make it up on volume.
Sir, we're losing $338,000 for every vehicle we sell.
Well, we're going to have to make it up in volume.
We're going to scale it up.
Interestingly enough, the largest shareholder in Lucid is Mohammed bin Salman.
The Prince of Saudi Arabia.
He's not somebody who's known for making shrewd investments.
But he does have deep pockets.
So maybe he'll keep losing $338,000 per vehicle.
So even Elon Musk said it's going to be a challenging 12 months.
It's a challenging 12 months for anybody to be able to afford a regular car.
But these are typically going $15,000 to $20,000 more than an internal combustion engine.
And has all these issues as well.
Rivian just announced they plan to raise $1.5 billion in convertible notes to shore up their balance sheet.
And Lucid's pinning its hopes on a new model that's going to be coming out in late 2024, if they can hang on that long.
They better not sell any cars or they'll be out of money by then.
But in 2024, they've got a new model and they're calling it Gravity.
I don't think the gravity of the situation is really at home with these people yet.
They need to talk to their accountants.
Maybe they should call it Gravitas.
The word that entered the echo chamber of journalism a few years ago.
Because it's very, very serious stuff.
My son says what they mean is they need significant scaling of government funding.
That's right, to make their business model work.
We have a new model coming out that we'll only lose a small amount of money on next year.
Yeah, if we can just hang on to that.
Yeah, how much of an improvement does it need to be to go from losing $338,000 a vehicle to making a profit?
I mean, it's radical. Brian Deb McCartney, you are brainwashed as a kid to accept the union and to think that they work for you as they pay themselves exorbitant salaries and take many work trips.
Yeah, it never brainwashed me.
I was very angry about it.
And, you know, one of the things that really bothered me, and I just say this too, I worked at Busch Gardens one summer, and we had a horn group and did Chicago tunes and things like that, and Maynard Ferguson stuff.
We alternated with belly dancers, and the musicians who played for them, well, one of them, the drummer, had to perform in one of these costume character things.
A lot of respect for him being able to do that.
But they had a guy who was doing it just for the summer.
And so they had a drummer.
They had a clarinet player who was actually an anthropology professor from USF. And they had an accordion player.
And I don't remember them having anybody other than just those three.
And then a bunch of belly dancers.
And they paid just under what the union wage was per hour.
But, according to the union, you would work 45 minutes and you get a 15 minute break.
What Busch Gardens was doing was, you know, they wanted continuous entertainment, so we would play a 30-minute set, and they'd play a 30-minute set.
So we were working less than 45 minutes, and if you normalized it, we were actually making more per hour than the minimum that the union wanted the musicians to make, but they weren't flexible about that.
Well, I don't care if you let them work for 30 minutes, you're still going to pay them this much per hour.
And so, at that time, I did that before I joined the union.
I had to join the union with another band that I got in after that.
But the belly dancer group, the guy who was playing accordion, was a member of the musicians' union.
But even in those days where there was live music, it was really hard to find a gig as an accordion player, as you can imagine.
He got this job.
And Busch Gardens being blackballed.
And they would send people around and look.
And they had somebody saw him from the union.
And they gave him a massive fine and all the rest of the stuff.
And that really left a bad taste in my mouth before I even got into the union.
So, yeah. What sort of instrument did you play, David?
I picture it was a bass player or a saxophone.
Oh, you got it. Saxophone.
Played sax. Also played keyboard, but not in the Busch Gardens band.
ON61 EV vehicles are government-sanctioned child slave labor.
Yeah, if you look at how they get the cobalt.
In Africa. No Truth in Them says electric four-wheel drive sounds like the worst off-road experience.
Well, yeah, there'll be a lot of people calling in a helicopter to get your car out of there.
It'll also be pretty heavy, too.
Comments about Disney.
Obsolete Man 1776.
Are tax dollars paid for that CIA-controlled operation called Disney?
Yeah. Grant 7777.
EVS will make our cars a centrally controlled commodity.
That's the whole point. Get everybody and everything on the grid.
Your car, your heat and air conditioning, your stove, I mean everything on the grid.
High boost, I'm sure the cables have copper in them, which is worth a lot of recycling.
My Lowe's now has all copper cables under lock and key now.
LA, they've got to put everything under lock and key.
Paleo Armory. Worthless in Texas.
We drive too far. Yep. Yep.
Everything is so far in Texas.
No demand on EV or Trump shot yet.
Constant heavy push.
They keep going. Brian and Deb McCartney.
David, we're going to send you a link to a new mining venture here in Minnesota.
Mining for EV battery minerals.
A Department of Defense venture.
Hmm. On CBDC, KWD68 is about to the point where the cash isn't accepted in some places, and in others, you get a look of amazement.
Yeah, well, remember, you know, I had Pierce Corbin on, and, you know, it was Aldi in the UK. We have them here, but they haven't done this yet.
But in the UK, they said, nope, no cash at all.
You have to op in, get our app, and then we will scan the stuff.
And he went in, and he got some strawberries, and he said, here's the money for the strawberries.
We can't take that. He said, call the police.
And they said, well, there's no crime.
This is legal tender. He can actually give you this stuff.
You've got to figure out how to process it.
Obsoleteman1776, I don't take cash, I won't give them my business.
Well, that was the point that he was making.
We're going to take a very quick break and we'll be right back.
Using free speech to free minds.
Music.
It's the David Knight Show.
Well, when we look at how the borders are wide open, and we understand the agenda behind that, you know, chaos, friction, all the rest of these things that are happening there.
I thought this was a very interesting video.
This is a black man in Georgia who is seeing all of these young military-age people brought in from Africa.
They don't even speak English.
You'll hear him at the very beginning of the thing.
He tries to engage one of these guys.
He says, are you all seeing this?
Do you understand what they're doing here?
You stand right there?
Huh? You stand right there?
Yeah. Okay, then.
So, how long have you been in America?
America, yeah. You been in America?
They flew you in?
Small. Yeah, they flew you in America.
Okay, go ahead, man.
I'm done. You don't see what's going on here.
And they stand right here.
You see what's going on here, guys?
See, I keep my eyes on opening.
Y'all right here being entertained, wanting to be separate.
And they bringing these people right in our communities, guys.
They're right in our communities.
There's something about to happen.
And we so busy being highly favored and coming against each other.
Yep. They're standing in this place right here.
These African guys right here.
Look at them right there. Y'all need to share this video, man.
While these are effing guys coming in, they just dropped them off, man.
In the melanated communities.
They dropped them off, guys.
They're just dropping them off in our communities.
Man, this is ridiculous.
Look at them. And this goes on for quite some time.
And he understands.
Y'all see what's happening with us?
You understand what's going on? They keep us entertained.
They keep us distracted. You know, even the people who pay attention to politics.
What's going on with the speaker's race?
What's going on between Trump and Biden as if it mattered?
They're doing this to us.
And, you know, when we look at this, we're talking, oh, it's Mexicans coming across the border.
No, no, no.
It's way beyond that.
Venezuelans are coming in far more than Mexicans are, for example.
They topped Mexicans for the largest group of nationals arrested illegally crossing the U.S. southern border for the first time on record.
Mexicans were arrested 39,733 times crossing the border, well behind Venezuelans and Guatemalans and Hondurans and Colombians rounded out the top five.
But they're coming in from all over the world, as he's pointing out.
They're bringing in people from Africa, putting them in the black community, but it's not families, it's young men.
He says, what are they doing?
What are they setting us up for?
The Biden administration recently announced temporary legal status for nearly a half million Venezuelans who are already in the United States on July 31st.
Border Patrol said, we're constantly engaging with domestic and foreign partners to address historic hemispheric migration, including large migrant groups traveling on freight trains, and to enforce consequence, including by preparing for direct repatriations to Venezuela.
I mean, when you look at these people, the massive programs in El Salvador, that harsh prison situation that they've got there.
Do you think that they're going to keep spending money on an army of soldiers to try to keep these people under control?
Or do you think maybe they'll just put them on a train and ship them north to us, which is what Castro did with his Mario boat lift decades ago?
There were 4,000 encounters of Chinese nationals along the southwest border in September, compared to 2,400 in August.
It's accelerating. In September 2022, there were only 400 encounters involving Chinese nationals.
In other words, more than 10 times the number in one year of people coming from China.
According to Border Patrol statistics, 169 people...
On the FBI terror watch list encountered between ports of entry at the Southern Board in the past 12 months, a number that exceeds not only fiscal year 22's record-setting 98.
So they set a record in 2022 of 98.
So far this year, it's 169.
They busted through that record pretty big.
And it was more than the last six years combined.
That's the number of people on a terrorist watch list.
There's one migrant for every American that is born, coming across in 2023.
That's Biden. He bragged about how he was going to replace and change the demographics of America.
Well, this is what it looks like. And when you look at this, it's actually more than that.
More than 4 million economic migrants crossed the southern border.
And that is in contrast to 3.67 million Americans born.
And those 3.67 million Americans that were born would include children of illegal aliens, anchor babies.
A vast economic competition for the 3 million American youths who graduated from schools in the 10 months up to October 2022.
So fewer jobs for high school students because if somebody can hire an adult, We're good to go.
She got into credit card issues.
She got evicted from her home.
She's living in her car.
That's her only thing that she owns right now.
Of course, they want to take the cars away.
And then they contrast that with a man who's come from Venezuela who is 45 years old and began working in construction, then changed jobs, now rents a basement apartment.
He's being given help by non-governmental organizations.
There's not any NGOs that are helping the Americans who are here.
The American dream has now become an alien dream.
Become alienated from all of this.
And it gets even worse as you saw him saying, you know, well, you all understand what is happening here?
Better understand, we look at the crime that is happening in El Salvador, we look at the fact we had 12 Mexican police officers ambushed by these drug gangs in Acapulco, and also the fact that what we saw happening in Minneapolis, where Ilhan Omar is elected as a Congress representative, many people said what they brought in with all the massive number of Somalis, they got about 90,000 that got brought in, They call it Little Mogadishu.
Very dangerous area, just like this guy saying in Georgia, hey, they're bringing in these people.
Maybe some of them are Somali.
We don't know. But they're doing the same thing in rural Wisconsin.
They start out with a few hundred that they bring in.
And then before you know it, they extend it to cousins and to grandparents and all the rest of this stuff.
And the 75 refugees that they're bringing into rural Wisconsin are likely to follow the same pattern that we saw in Minneapolis, exploding into tens of thousands.
Thank you for joining us.
The Common Man.
They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
They created common past to track and control us.
Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
And the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.
▲
Export Selection