Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 23, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:01:52

The David Knight Show - 10/23/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 23rd of October, the 23rd of October, year of our Lord, 2023.
	We've got a lot of big news in terms of updates about both MacGuffins, big MacGuffins, the COVID MacGuffin and the Climate MacGuffin, the massive pipeline that Sheriff Mack talked about defending somebody who was having their property taken away by a massive corporation for an insane reason that you won't believe.
	Having to do with the climate, MacGuffin.
	That has now been stopped.
	And we now have yet another basis to penetrate the PrEP Act and sue these criminals and the pharmaceutical industry out of business.
	So we'll be talking about all that as well as elections.
	We'll have an update on what has happened with that.
	that, but we're going to begin with what is at the forefront of everybody's concern, and that is World War III.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, this email from David, David F. says, the psychopaths have taken over the U.S., now positioning all of our ships and aircraft carriers to be sunk by other countries.
	These ships are all about to be tombs.
	These psychopaths tried to kill or injure all of us with a jab.
	They have left the borders open for invasion.
	They have flown our enemies in on jumbo jets in the middle of the night.
	They're poisoning our food and water with over 9,000 deadly approved chemicals.
	They hate our churches.
	They hate our children.
	You need to call your family members in the U.S. military and let them know the psychopaths in charge are strategically moving our aircraft carriers and ships so they can be sunk.
	Well, we will see what happens with all this, but of course, this has been Joel Skousen's belief for quite some time.
	He has held to this that this is a desire to destroy every aspect of our country, including our military, which, by the way, is...
	What's the point of a military if you can't even defend your border?
	And of course, they don't want to defend the border.
	And as a matter of fact, when you look at the military, this is amazing.
	The White House doxxed special forces so that Biden could have a photo op.
	He had a show-up picture of this.
	He's out there shaking hands with people who are part of the special forces.
	They published the picture, which showed their pictures, showed identifiable tattoos and other things on these people.
	Accidentally, of course.
	Posted a photo of their faces on Instagram this week, which put their safety at risk.
	It was after Biden's visit to Israel, so the White House posted a photo of Biden meeting with special operators on his Instagram account, which has 7.5 million followers.
	But hey, it's worth it.
	The safety risk of these people is worth it because it shows just how cool and powerful Joe Biden is, right?
	Yeah, these are the people that I can order to go kill and die for me.
	White House failed to blur or otherwise obscure faces of special forces, reveal their identities to adversaries, just send some assassins across a wide-open border that he makes sure he keeps open.
	Caption of the photo read, In Israel, President Biden met with first responders to thank them for their bravery in the work that they're doing in response to the Hamas terrorist attacks.
	A retired Army Chief Warrant Officer, 2 Samuel Shoemate, brought the blunder to the public's attention after hundreds of thousands had already seen the photo.
	He says, as soon as this was brought to our attention, said the military, we immediately deleted the photo.
	We regret the error and any issues this may have caused.
	But hey, it's worth it, right?
	Because it makes Biden look so strong.
	Isn't it amazing? Isn't it amazing how you have these people on the right now saying, well, that's it.
	You know, Biden, after this little speech, well, it just shows how strong and effective he is.
	He's strong enough. He can take us to war.
	Nuki Haley is strong enough.
	She can take us to war. Little Lindsey Graham.
	Strong enough that he can take us.
	Of course, they're not strong enough to go to war themselves.
	Never decided to do that.
	But they can send you to war.
	And then we've got Boris Johnson.
	This speech by Biden just shows that only America can save the world.
	Yeah, the greatest country ever in the history of the world, said Biden.
	Well, we know what happens with that kind of pride.
	Very concerning. You know, as we say, just talking about this yesterday at church, pray for your leaders, right?
	Pray for those in power and authority.
	Keep them far away from us.
	That's one thing.
	But pray for their salvation.
	God can change and save even Joe Biden.
	I know it's amazing, but that's not our decision to make as to whether or not this guy is beyond the pale.
	Certainly looks like that to me, but, you know, it would be faithless for us to pray that way.
	And so we need to pray that God will do something to intervene.
	That'd be one of the things to intervene.
	That's one of the reasons why I played that clip on Friday.
	Right? What is happening?
	Well, we have a prideful A man who thinks he's going to live forever.
	He can do whatever he wants.
	All of them do.
	Dianne Feinstein thought that.
	All of them think they're going to live forever.
	They're in it for power.
	They think they're better than everybody else.
	They think they're God, quite frankly.
	And when we look at that guy who was with Hezbollah, And Jesus got a hold of him.
	I mean, whatever you think, this guy had an experience that he sincerely believed, and it changed his life.
	He had a road to Damascus experience when he was on his way to the U.S. to commit terror or to convert Christians to Islam or whatever it was he was going to do.
	And it really does show what the fundamental problem is.
	We have warring groups of people who don't know Christ, the Prince of Peace.
	He came not so much for peace on earth, as we sing at Christmas time, but for peace between God and man.
	We're in rebellion against God, and that's why we fight each other.
	And so the peace between God and man also has as a side effect.
	Peace between men.
	And so we have people like Lindsey Graham, Nuki Haley, Joe Biden, all these people who just want war.
	It makes them more powerful. They have no regard for their fellow man.
	That would all change if God changed them.
	So pray for that. That's our first line of defense, quite frankly.
	It isn't our last, oh, we haven't got a prayer.
	We tried everything else, yeah?
	And so, well, everything else didn't work, so let's finally do a prayer.
	And now we don't even have that anymore.
	Do it first. Do it first.
	That's the most important thing. Do it first.
	So, General McGuffin, I live within a few miles of Air National Guard Base and Shaw Air Force Base.
	Big increase in training activity last week, yes.
	Big increase. Of course, this is not the first time Biden's used troops as political props since September of last year.
	He did his Dark Brandon thing and he had a couple of Marines in dress uniform standing there to show you just how serious and how dangerous he is.
	Because he's bragged over and over again.
	You think you've got a Second Amendment?
	You think you can stop me? I'm the most powerful man that's ever lived.
	We have the most powerful government.
	We've got planes and rockets and jets.
	All you've got is guns.
	Well, that's all the people in Gaza have.
	And it's going to be a meat grinder for the Israelis to go in there.
	Everybody knows it. Betraya said it.
	I mentioned it last Friday.
	He said this is going to be Mogadishu on steroids.
	He said they've had a lot of time to prepare.
	As a matter of fact, don't you think they prepared for the response before they initiated the attack?
	They have the place booby-trapped, landmines, tunnels, you name it.
	As a matter of fact, I was talking to somebody at church yesterday.
	He's been in the military. He said, look at the equipment these people have.
	They got from Afghanistan, got from Ukraine perhaps, and certainly from Afghanistan.
	He said he's got a picture of an eight-year-old girl holding a high-powered rifle with a scope on it.
	I said, that's a $1,500 scope.
	And so, yeah, even the late-year-old girls have got high-tech, very expensive equipment.
	And the missile engagements that we saw about that U.S. warship, the missiles that were fired from Yemen, probably by the Houthis.
	The name cracks me up.
	Anyway, it's like the Hutus and the Tutsis in Rwanda, but it wasn't any laughing matter for the people who were living there.
	It had a funny name, but my opinion.
	But anyway, they saw cruise missiles, there were drones, all these other things being launched from Yemen.
	They said they thought it was going towards Israel, not necessarily at this ship.
	And it went on for nine hours.
	Four cruise missiles, 15 drones over a period of nine hours that they shot down.
	The USS Kearney, an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer that traversed the Suez Canal.
	Heading south on Wednesday intercepted the missiles and drones as they were heading north along the Red Sea.
	Now, we'd reported that, but the fact that it went on for nine hours and the quantity of the attack was truly amazing.
	The sustained barrage of drones and missiles targeting Israel from far outside the Gaza conflict is one of the series of worrying signs that the war risks are escalating beyond the borders of the coastal enclave.
	Pentagon Press Secretary said the missiles were fired by Iranian-backed Houthi forces in Yemen.
	And were launched potentially toward targets in Israel.
	U.S. interceptions of Houthi launches are exceedingly rare.
	In October 2016, so that's seven years ago, the USS Mason deployed countermeasures to stop an attempted attack in the Red Sea, targeting the Navy destroyer and other ships nearby.
	In response, the U.S. fired sea-launched cruise missiles at Houthi radar facilities in Yemen.
	You know, they had a destroyer in the Red Sea.
	All these people saying the Red Sea was parted by Moses.
	You know, it's so shallow, just a little wind.
	As a matter of fact, I saw that Joe Rogan had Ben Shapiro on, and he asked him, he said, so what do you think about Jesus?
	He's just a criminal that was executed.
	Well, what do you think about the other miracles in the Bible?
	Well, I don't believe in miracles, said Ben Shapiro.
	What about parting of the Red Sea?
	No, that was just a wind.
	Just a wind. That sustained it for 4 million people to walk across on dry land.
	Ben Shapiro doesn't even believe Moses.
	If he believed him, he'd believe in Jesus, but he doesn't.
	Anyway... Yeah, the Red Sea.
	It is deep enough that it's a good thing a wind wasn't blowing because that destroyer would have been sitting on dry land, right?
	Might have been enough of a wind with those missiles going by there to make it a dry land.
	On Wednesday, one-way attack drones targeted two different U.S. positions in Iraq.
	One of the attacks resulted in minor injuries.
	One day later, the garrison in Syria...
	Wait, garrison? We got a U.S. garrison in Syria?
	How did we get there? Do we have a vote on this or anything?
	No. They even tell us that?
	No. We hear about it when they get attacked.
	Otherwise, we don't hear about it.
	You know, Trump bragged, he said, we're going to take the oil.
	Well, I guess that's what they're doing.
	Our garrison in Syria, which houses U.S. and coalition forces, was targeted by two drones, which also caused minor injuries.
	You notice how they portray this as if the Syrians are the aggressors.
	We've set up military bases.
	We haven't had a discussion about a war.
	We've set up military bases.
	We're stealing their oil.
	We're attacking them.
	And it's a big deal when they shoot back at us.
	Early Friday morning in Iraq, two rockets targeted the Baghdad Diplomatic Support Center near the airport, which houses U.S. military diplomatic and civilian personnel.
	One rocket was intercepted by a counter-rocket system, while the second one hit an empty storage facility.
	50% deterrence.
	China has deployed six warships to the Middle East.
	Ah, and the plot thickens, doesn't it?
	Starting to get crowded there, with everybody sending all of their weapons to that little area.
	So, the U.S. is going to send more air defense systems.
	The Terminal High Altitude Area Defense...
	I guess you pronounce that as THAAD with two A's.
	Additional Patriot Air Defense Missile Systems.
	The U.S. has sent a significant amount of naval power, of course, to the area.
	So, you know, we're going to be cheek to jowl with the Chinese there who are trying to project political power.
	I thought this was interesting.
	Six steps that could see the Gaza crisis spiral into World War III. This is coming out of the UK. These were put together by Admiral Lord West.
	They have interesting names.
	They have one minister there who is cleverly.
	I love when I say, Minister cleverly said.
	His last name is cleverly, but he sounds like an adjective.
	And of course, whatever they say, even if it's an outright lie, the British say it cleverly, don't they?
	Well, if things go really wrong, Admiral Lord West predicted the UK and the US could see boots on the ground in Israel and Lebanon and Syria and Iran and Russia might be drawn into the fight.
	Again, the question is, is that intentional?
	I mean, they've been spoiling for this fight for the longest time.
	Everybody in positions of power, in our government, in Israel, Netanyahu, all of them.
	For the longest time, they've wanted this.
	Wesley Clark, hey, they got plans to go against, yeah, Iraq.
	Oh, really? Oh, that's not it, you know?
	What was it, seven, nine different countries that they wanted, list that they wanted to go through?
	Meanwhile, at least 4,000 Palestinians have been killed.
	After almost two weeks of Israel pounding the densely populated enclave from above, some reports put the number at 4,800, In a flammable mix of promises of revenge, military alliances, violent protests, high civilian casualties, the crisis could be a powder keg.
	Well, of course it is.
	I mean, just look at what is happening on the street in the United States and Europe, all the rest of this stuff.
	And it doesn't matter what is true to anybody.
	They believe what they want to hear.
	A hospital report is a good example of that.
	A church report, a good example of that.
	And as I said from day one, now we've seen the pictures, yet it didn't hit the hospital per se.
	Nevertheless, you still had a lot of people that died, and you've now had a missile that the people who don't like Israel will say, well, they targeted a Christian church there.
	Justin Amash had two family members, Christians, Christian Palestinians who were there, who were killed.
	It doesn't look like it hit the church directly.
	It hit close to the church.
	But look, this is what is going to happen.
	Gaza is so heavily populated.
	Two and a half million people packed into 140 square miles.
	As I pointed out, it's about, what was it, about a quarter or a fifth of the size of Nashville?
	And you've got two and a half million people there, which is about four or five times the number of people that are in Nashville.
	So, when you have everybody packed together that tightly, Even a surgical strike can kill a lot of innocent people.
	And you're not going, every missile isn't going to be perfect.
	I said at the very beginning, I said, regardless of what happened with this hospital, I said nobody would deliberately target the hospital, regardless of how evil they are.
	It's a bad strategy, right?
	It's the one thing you could do that would turn everybody against you.
	And even though they didn't deliberately target the hospital, or they missed it if they targeted the hospital, depending on your bias, it did inflame everybody.
	And so these types of things are going to continue.
	The fog of war, difficult to determine what actually happened.
	Also difficult to determine people's motivations.
	But strategically, it makes no sense to do that.
	And I pointed out, just like it made absolutely no sense for Syria to use...
	Chemical weapons, and they didn't.
	We eventually could show that they didn't, but it was being used to try to drag us in.
	And so, you go back and look at the hospital.
	It appears that that was a lie that was exaggerated by the mainstream media, by the Muslim press, and now they are doing the same thing with the church.
	But this is going to continue to happen, and you're going to have innocent people who are going to die in this.
	So Lord West laid out the crisis and how it could descend into World War III. First of all, Israel overreacts.
	They use a very heavy hand.
	They use, you wind up with a high civilian casualty approach.
	Because again, with the higher number of 500, which looks to be hugely exaggerated, that was still half of what was the number of people who were murdered By the Hamas attack.
	And look at the backlash around the world as to that.
	If there's huge casualties in Gaza, or if people say that there are huge casualties in Gaza, then there's a possibility that Hezbollah would get involved.
	And then the war spreads to Lebanon.
	Step number two.
	Iran backed Hezbollah.
	As a strong military and a political grip on Lebanon, they've taken over that The Palestinians have put it into a constant state of war.
	It's already fought a devastating war against Israel in 2006.
	It claimed 1,200 lives.
	Since October the 7th, Hezbollah has been sending solidarity rockets across Israel's northern border and threatens to join the war, quote, when the time comes, unquote.
	So the result has been sporadic, deadly clashes at the border, one of which hit a group of international journalists, killing one, injuring six.
	Foreign powers have urged Hezbollah to stay put on the sidelines over fears that the conflict will spill over into Lebanon and open up a new front.
	Jerusalem has long seen the Lebanon-based terror group as a bigger threat than Hamas.
	They have more advanced weaponry.
	And including precision missiles and drones, Israel would react very strongly against them, says Lord West, no doubt conducting attacks into Lebanon.
	And then the next step, Syria.
	And of course, Russia is already in Syria, has been there for a long time.
	And so are we.
	With the possibility of Lebanon in shambles, the next step could be for Russia-backed Syria.
	To join in. Assad would be very stupid, but he might feel that he should somehow be involved.
	Well, he already is involved.
	Lord West doesn't point out here.
	There's already been multiple attacks on airports in Syria, including Aleppo.
	Tell that to Gary Johnson.
	Aleppo? Yeah.
	There's been multiple attacks at the airports, and of course, we're there all the time.
	Stealing oil. Assad is supported by Russia.
	He invited Russia and didn't invite us in.
	Israel-Hamas war is already fantastic, says West for Putin, because it's taken people's eyes off of the Ukraine conflict.
	Then a war with Iran, the next step, and the six steps to a world war.
	The retired admiral said that if it came really bad and Israel attacked Iran, then there's no doubt that Iran would accuse the U.S. and the U.K. of being involved.
	So suddenly the thing has expanded quite dramatically.
	Iran sees us as a little Satan, the great Satan being America, said, well, the us means Israel.
	Iran is a key backer, Palestinian group Hamas, as well as Hezbollah.
	Then that might bring the US and the UK into the fight because we've got all these politicians on the sideline have been anxious to go to war with Iran for decades.
	They've already sent military naval forces there.
	If Israel begins to fall apart due to Hezbollah and Hamas, then there's a real danger that the US and the UK get involved.
	Same type of thing that They've said about Ukraine.
	If it goes against our surrogate, well, then we get involved.
	If things go really wrong, NATO will be looking to increase our capability in the eastern Mediterranean because this might turn into a fight.
	And then finally, Saudi Arabia forced in.
	The last step to a terrifying puzzle of pieces that could plunge the world into war would be for Saudi Arabia to step into the chaos.
	For years, Iran has supported Yemen's Houthi rebels who are at war with Saudi Arabia.
	They also share Iran's distinct hatred for the U.S. and for Israel.
	Well, what they don't mention is the bigger issues, of course, are Russia and China.
	And both of them are looking to enhance this.
	It takes us away from Russia's fight with Ukraine, and it takes us away from Russia.
	China's actions against Taiwan.
	So both of them are interested to see what they can do to draw us into that quagmire there between Israel and Gaza.
	And of course, another warmonger, Mike McCall, Congressman.
	I'm in favor of Biden linking Ukraine and Israel aid.
	Bipartisan. And you spell that, not B-I, but B-U-Y. B-U-Y. Let's buy all this stuff from the military industrial corporations.
	The corporatocracy.
	This war machine is licking its chops for the money.
	For the money. Follow the money.
	There's always a lot of big money pushing wars.
	Rich man's war, poor man's fight.
	Anchor Jonathan Karl said the Biden administration has a supplemental funding request that includes Israel and Ukraine.
	Let's take a look at what's in the package.
	$61 billion for Ukraine.
	$14 billion for Israel.
	$9 billion for humanitarian aid.
	$7 billion for bolstering the defense of Taiwan.
	$14 billion for the U.S. border.
	Are you in favor of this package?
	He asked Mike McCall.
	He says, I'm in favor of the concept of linking the biggest threats to the free world, and that is, you know, since the fall of Afghanistan, Putin invaded Ukraine.
	That's a threat to Europe.
	Chairman Xi is threatening Taiwan, the Pacific.
	Now we have a war with the Middle East, so it links all of that together.
	Including, you know, of course, our own country, and we just throw that in for our giggles, right?
	The southwest border. I finally get around to that, as if they really cared about that.
	Glitch McConnell has said the same thing.
	It all links together, he said.
	They want a world war.
	This is the time that we're in.
	And again, you look at it and you say, well, is there anything we can do?
	Will they relent if we write them a letter?
	No. You can sit there and watch this, and you can prepare.
	But again, you better pray about this.
	Because that's the only thing that's going to stop this.
	Our prayers are mighty weapons because we have a mighty God who has told us to ask for that and to expect that.
	He will listen.
	So we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Making sense.
	Common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back.
	Some of the comments, very good comments.
	Chase Broughton. Says there's no stopping it.
	As sure as the season will change, this war will come.
	Winter may be early, or it may be late, but it will come.
	Neil Howe, fourth turning.
	I agree with that, but, you know, when they go back and they look at history over 500 years, it's usually accompanied by war.
	That is a massive economic disruption.
	70- to 80-year period where people have realized that these institutions that they've created since the last fourth running were just as failed as institutions that they overthrew before that.
	You know, we always create these institutions and we all have such great faith that they're going to get it right this time.
	And then after 70 or 80 years, we realize that the things that men create don't work.
	Certainly. And, you know, it's just that your faith in these institutions has disappeared.
	Like your faith in politicians, for example.
	And we're going to talk about some of the elections here.
	We've got some results from Argentina.
	But... Yeah, it doesn't always happen that way.
	It usually does, unfortunately.
	That's the time that we're in.
	But of course, you know, God can do anything.
	And about the military putting their ships in harm's way, I began with a quote from Blisner.
	And on a rumble, PMUR42 says, Is somebody in the military?
	I can tell you, we know.
	We all know. Yes.
	Yes. Yeah, that's true.
	It's like Oliver Anthony said, or Anthony Oliver, I guess.
	I think it's Oliver Anthony was his name.
	Yeah. He said, you think we don't know, but we do.
	We know about all this stuff.
	The question is, what do we do about it?
	Well, there's nothing we can do about Washington.
	Hopeless disarray up there.
	And these people bought and sold, bickering among themselves, trying to climb to the top of the ladder themselves.
	Just look at the disarray of the Republican Party.
	Dougalug on Rockfin says, did he say solidarity rockets?
	That's a new one.
	And my son says, yeah, those are the friendliest types of rockets.
	We're going to send these in solidarity with you.
	Problem is, they blow things apart.
	They are antithetical to solidarity.
	Bukharki says, U.S. border should receive the most funding.
	Absolutely. I think that we either need to defend our border and make that the number one priority, or maybe we change the name of it to the War Department, which is what they used to call it.
	It used to be called the War Department.
	And then when we stopped defending this country, we called it the Defense Department.
	Now that we've got wars abroad constantly, preemptively, without declaration, now we call it the Defense Department and not the War Department.
	Well, I won't even try to pronounce that.
	I'm not really sure how to pronounce that.
	But on Rumble, the most powerful nation in the history of the modern world can't secure its own border.
	It's by design. Yes, it is.
	Yeah, the barbarians have passed the gate because there isn't any gate.
	It's a 400 mile long wall with a 1600 mile gate.
	And the barbarians are coming in from everywhere.
	Coming in from the countries that are at war with us.
	Lots of special interest people picked up.
	Let's take a look at the election information here.
	Argentina had its vote yesterday.
	They were still counting votes late last night.
	It appears that the massive media campaign has worked.
	Two things. Massive media campaign against the libertarian.
	It says, we've got to get off of this campaign.
	We've got to get rid of the central bank here in Argentina.
	The Argentine peso is in hyperinflation.
	The official inflation rate, 138%.
	The interest rates that the central bank is charging, setting at 133%.
	He says, look, I know there's no good central banks, and Federal Reserve is not good either.
	He says it's just not as bad as ours.
	So we need to shut down the Argentine peso, and we need to link this to the U.S. dollar, because that's the only stability that they've got right now.
	The dollar is relatively stable.
	But the Peronistas.
	Don't cry for me, Argentina.
	Evita and all the rest of these Marxists.
	They're now the ruling party, and they came in in third place when they had the initial election.
	They took the top three vote-getters, and they had an election yesterday, and You didn't have to get more than 50%, but it's something like 40% or 45% in order to win.
	And again, in this three-way thing, nobody made it, so there's not an outright winner.
	There will be a runoff, but the Peronistas came from third place to first place.
	Was it voting fraud?
	Was it the press manipulating things?
	Was it the Peronistas manipulating things with income taxes and promises of welfare and all the rest of the stuff?
	Yes, yes, all of the above.
	All of the above, I'm sure.
	I don't know anything about the election fraud, but, you know, look, every election's got fraud to some degree or the other.
	But certainly there was manipulation by the ruling party.
	In terms of saying, oh, we're going to give you more money and we're going to cut taxes and all the rest of this stuff, when they've got 138% inflation as the official inflation rate, you know it is much, much higher than that.
	So, yeah, the Peronist Coalition smashed expectations to lead the country's general elections on Sunday, setting the stage for a polarized runoff vote next month.
	Between Economy Minister Sergio Massa, and he's a Peronista, and far-right, libertarian, radical, Javier Malay, they don't identify this Massa guy as far-left.
	He is. They don't identify him as a rabid socialist, which he is.
	But they call Malai a libertarian radical and far right.
	This is typical of the kinds of stuff that you see everywhere in Reuters.
	Everywhere you look, Argentina's Trump, Argentina's Trump, Argentina's Trump.
	The Wall Street Journal focuses, because the Wall Street Journal doesn't want to attack directly free market economics.
	They know better than that.
	So they attack his hairstyle.
	Oh, look at this. This is a former rocker, and this is a guy who has attacked the Pope and so forth, even though he's a Catholic.
	I know a lot of Catholics who disagree with the Pope, who don't think the Pope is Catholic.
	The old rhetorical question, is the Pope Catholic?
	Well, most traditional Catholics would say no.
	And so how is that a pejorative for him?
	But again, they push over and over again.
	The guy understands economics.
	And he's been very effective in terms of getting people to understand that.
	And you can see, even in the comments in this Reuters article, Masa, the Peronista, the authoritarian communist, fascist, had over 36% of the votes.
	Malai had 30%.
	While conservative Patricia Bullrich was behind at 23.8%, with nearly 90% of the vote counted.
	A result that defied pre-election polls that had predicted a huge win by Malai.
	And as you look at their interviews with people, I thought it was very interesting.
	The older people were in their 60s.
	Are the ones who really have bought into this socialism.
	That's one thing that's very different from our country.
	In our country, it's the younger generation that has bought into the Marxism and the socialism.
	But in their country, it's the other way around.
	And, uh, part of that is, um, uh, the book, um, from, uh, Alex, was it Alex Meyer?
	15, uh, um, 15 lessons, street lessons about, see if you can look it up.
	Um, I forget.
	I interviewed him, but again, he's a friend of Malai.
	He's from Chile. And he wrote a very good, simple book to explain it.
	Best seller throughout South America.
	And he's got it translated into English now.
	But it is reaching the younger people.
	So you look at the 60-year-old people.
	Peronism, 61-year-old guy, Carlos Gutierrez.
	Peronism is the only space that offers the possibility that the poorest of us can have basic things at our fingertips.
	He wants a command-control, centrally-controlled economy where he lives on handouts.
	That's the way that the 60-year-old people, that's the way they've always existed.
	They don't have any history, really, of seeing how the invisible hand of the free market can provide far more than this.
	They've got those blinders on.
	Reminds me of when the Russians came, you know, when you had Boar Shelton who came to Houston.
	And he's looking around and it's like, wow, I can't believe all the choices.
	This is really confusing. Look at all the choices of this or that, you know, that are here on the shelf.
	How could that happen? They don't even have stuff on their shelves because of a centrally planned, centrally controlled economy.
	But, you know, before we had Trump telling us that we're non-essential and locking us down with unconstitutional authority and medical martial law, we did pretty well keeping the shelves stocked.
	That created a bit of a problem, and it's still reverberating through the system.
	Malai is proposing radical moves, says Reuters, such as dollarizing the economy.
	I think what's radical is 138% inflation from his central bank, don't you?
	133% interest rates?
	They're not even at that, even at 133% interest rates.
	They're still not getting the interest rates above the inflation rate that they say.
	And, of course, we know that the actual inflation rate is going to be higher than any central bank admits to.
	Malai has pledged to chainsaw the economic and political status quo, luring angry voters into his tear it all down message, fed up with annual inflation at close to 140% and poverty affecting over two-fifths of the population.
	Yeah, we shouldn't get rid of that kind of an economy, right?
	We shouldn't radically change something.
	Why would you think you'd want to radically change something where you've got 140% inflation?
	He's the only one, says a 22-year-old, he is the only one who understands the situation of the country and understands how to save it.
	A student, Nicholas Mercado, 22 years old.
	So that's what I'm saying. It's upside down from the U.S. There, the students are looking at this and saying, well, we've got to try something different.
	Peronistas have been in power for a very long time, and they've created this situation.
	But then going back to another 62-year-old retiree, Susanna Munoz, said the right is advancing everywhere and that we have characters like Malai is unthinkable.
	Well, there you go.
	60-year-old people, the 20-year-old people.
	All governments promise things and end up sinking us a little more, said a housewife who's 37 years old.
	It seems unbelievable, but we're getting worse and worse.
	We read that other countries have overcome the problems that for us are getting worse every day.
	Well, we can identify with that as well, can't we?
	We look at it. Now, here's the other thing that happened besides the massive press, full-court press against Malai.
	Slandering him at every opportunity.
	The Peronist candidate, who is the economy minister.
	I mean, he's the economy minister in a country that's got 140% inflation.
	How does he come out first place?
	But what he did was he said, well, we're going to cut taxes and give everybody a raise.
	That's his answer to inflation.
	Obviously he has not read the 15 steps about economics.
	Guard Goldsmith. Good to see you there, Guard.
	He says, I'm glad I can distinguish myself from the MRCTV higher-ups regarding their position of support for Israel.
	Taking a side on this is not only unconstitutional, it is unworkable.
	I agree. I'm not interested in taking sides in this conflict.
	Or in the elections either.
	You know, you pick these people and there's, especially when we look at politics here domestically, That ought to be enough of a caution that we don't get involved in politics and solutions abroad, right? We can't even solve our problems here at home.
	And Gard also says to Harps, he says, perhaps the banking gang printed more money to pay for the ads for the Peron gang.
	Yeah, that's probably it.
	And General McGovern says, print money?
	They don't bother doing that. They just add it on a keyboard.
	That's right. They don't have enough trees to cut down.
	Just think of all of the...
	That's one thing they should...
	Bill Gates, instead of saying, cut down all the trees and now bury them.
	Used to be we fought climate change by planting trees.
	Now we fight climate change by cutting the trees down and burying them.
	See how they just conveniently change it based on how they want to make money?
	But, you know, hey, if that's true, then I guess we could just cut all the trees down and start printing paper money with it.
	But, of course, they're papering the world with money over the green agenda anyway.
	So, it's amazing.
	So, what he's done is, with 138% inflation, he decided that he would cut taxes.
	Because he's not an economist.
	He's a demagogue.
	He's attempting to recoup lost electoral ground by spending heavily as well, giving millions of informal workers handouts, increasing Social Security paychecks, upping salaries for government employees.
	All that, say economists, because the guy who is the minister of the economy, the economy minister, the guy who is the economy minister doesn't know anything about economics.
	So it'll be largely financed by central bank money printing, quote unquote, that'll fuel inflation further.
	The lost revenue via the income tax reduction combined with the increased federal spending, fiscal spending that they have there, you know, more Social Security stuff, more higher salaries for public sector employees and all the rest of the giveaways and tax cuts.
	It will heighten the risk to Argentina's $44 billion program with the IMF. So what's the IMF going to say about that?
	You know, the ultimate bankers that are going to be pulling the strings on them.
	Well, anyway, this is what has happened there.
	It's a combination of that ludicrous economic program and massive attacks against Javier Malay and his personality.
	And again, I don't...
	No, speaking of language, I can't speak to his personality issues one way or the other.
	The House, however, as we look at money, there's a lot of money flowing around Washington between the Bidens.
	House investigators on Friday revealed a $200,000 direct payment to Joe Biden being laundered by his brother James.
	Pull that picture up and show that.
	You know, when you look at the two of these guys next to each other, I mean, are they doppelgangers or what?
	Maybe we should, you know, this whole thing went around on Thursday and Friday, you know, about, oh, look, Biden's wearing a mask.
	You know, he's got chin balls on either side of his chin.
	And it looks like on his throat there, he's got a mask.
	He's got a turkey neck like most old men.
	And look on the side, there's a crease, you know.
	That's got to be a mask, too.
	Well, look, folks, maybe it's just his brother.
	If you don't realize that Biden is a puppet at this point, does it matter who's wearing the mask?
	I mean, Biden is a mask.
	He is a mask. Whoever is there, mask or no mask, he's a puppet for the people who really run the show.
	The regulatory state's running it.
	The CIA is making the shots, calling the shots and all the rest of the stuff.
	I mean, that's not even...
	It's just amazing to me.
	But, you know, it's what the alternative media likes to focus on.
	You know, man in the mask.
	But in 2018, his brother James, James Biden, received $600,000 in loans from a company called AmeriCorps.
	It was on the verge of bankruptcy.
	They run a lot of rural hospitals because, again, one of the reasons that you saw this hospital death protocol and everything under Trump is because hospitals are typically run by massive corporations that are on a lot of different hospitals.
	Hospitals are being run by bean counters, also being run by these huge corporations.
	So, according to the bankruptcy court documents, James Biden received these loans, quote, based upon representations that his last name, Biden, could open doors and that he could obtain a large investment from the Middle East based on his political connections, unquote. On March 1, 2018, AmeriCorps wired a $200,000 loan into James and Sarah Biden's personal bank account.
	Now, this is highly unusual, right?
	Forget about the fact that it's even, you know, that it's bankrupt.
	Since when do corporations loan that kind of money to their employees?
	Treat it as a bank or something?
	So the very fact that this was reported as a loan is suspicious, right?
	But then the influence issues are clearly that.
	And put it into their personal bank account, not into their business bank account.
	The personal bank account of Biden's brother, not his business bank account.
	On the same day, James Biden then turned around and wrote a $200,000 check from the same personal account to Joe Biden.
	Chairman James Comer, who is chair of the Oversight Committee investigating this, This summer, Joe Biden said, where's the money?
	Well, we found some. And we're still digging into evidence subpoenaed from bank accounts belonging to Hunter Biden and to James and Sarah Biden, brother and sister-in-law of the president.
	And so here is some important context about this check that we've obtained in our investigation.
	He says, James wrote this check to Joe as a loan repayment.
	And AmeriCorps, a distressed company, loaned money to James Biden and then sent it to Joe Biden.
	As I said, it's very strange that a company would make a big loan like that to somebody on their board.
	I mean, that's suspicious of corruption right there.
	But especially when it's on the verge of bankruptcy.
	Does he have any documents proving that he lent such a large sum of money to his brother to be repaid?
	And what were the terms of such financial arrangements?
	And so, you know, everybody's paying back loans.
	Well, where do these loans really exist?
	Did he have a similar financial arrangement with other family members that led them to make similar large payments to Joe Biden?
	Did he know that the same day James Biden wrote him a check for $200,000 that Biden had just received a loan for the exact same amount?
	From business dealings with a company that was in financial distress and failing?
	And Comer went on to say, we have found a lot of other suspicious transactions.
	So, what is going to happen with this?
	Well, Marjorie Taylor Greene calls on him to resign.
	Will he do it? No, of course not.
	Will anything happen with him?
	Of course not. Because that's where we are.
	And everybody knows it.
	Just as all the people in the military understand what's really going on with this nonsense and how they're being put at risk unnecessarily, we all know the Bidens are corrupt.
	We know it before the 2020 election.
	They slow walked all of this stuff about the Hunter Biden laptop and then when New York Post tried to release it at the last minute, They were ready with a counter-narrative and with the FBI to shut all that stuff down.
	Same thing is going to happen with this.
	The author of Breaking Biden says, Meet Jim Biden, nightclub owner, international business mogul, and Joe's bag man.
	Nightclub owner. Well, yeah.
	Anybody ever identify in the press, especially the conservative press, did they ever identify Trump as a failed casino owner?
	No? Not to say that, you know, the Bidens aren't corrupt, but it cuts both ways, doesn't it?
	Seemingly his entire life, Biden's brother James.
	Biden has benefited from his brother's political status at various moments.
	He's been a campaign finance maven, a nightclub owner, a hedge fund mastermind.
	James Biden appears to be a man who wears many hats, but in actuality he only wears one.
	He's Joe Biden's brother.
	Near the end of the Obama administration, James Biden joined AmeriCorps, the hospital company that runs hospitals in many different states.
	Again, these big corporations running hospitals is why you don't have moral, ethical health care.
	James Biden's experience in health care seems to be non-existent, of course, just like Hunter Biden's experience in energy issues.
	It was nonexistent, but he gets put on a high-ranking position with Burisma.
	But his value was clear.
	Promoting himself as his brother Joe's chief fundraiser, James Biden promised that he could open doors and raise money from companies across the world.
	Including a major Turkish conglomerate.
	But the promised investments never materialized.
	And in December of 2019, remember they wrote this $200,000 check in March of 2018.
	And then by December 2019, they declared bankruptcy.
	Weeks later, the FBI raided an Amicor office in Pennsylvania as part of an investigation into white-collar crimes.
	But then I guess somebody higher up said there's nothing to see here, and they shut it down, I guess.
	Investors and partners have sued over management, alleging false promises and misappropriation of money.
	Most notably, James Biden is accused of fraudulently transferring funds from AmeriCorps outside of the ordinary course of business, quote-unquote.
	I guess in some of these lawsuits.
	In 2018, he took over a half million dollars in personal loans from the company, according to a former executive, which may or may not have been repaid.
	Getting the exact dollar amounts and dates of the transfer is significant.
	Independent investigators can't look at this kind of stuff, but now with subpoena power, we see that Comer can get this type of information.
	Next up, the committee ought to ask James exactly what he did for AmeriCorps and explain the transfers both to him and to Joe.
	Naturally, this is not James Biden's only blatant attempt to capitalize on the family name to bag cash.
	Breaking Biden, he says, I document several others.
	There's inexplicable business ties to Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and quote-unquote beyond.
	This is, when you look at his bio, That he put on one of the companies that he joined, Hillstone.
	At that time, the firm was negotiating massive contracts in war-torn Iraq to build 100,000 homes.
	This is kind of sound like the stuff that we had Dick Cheney involved in, right?
	You know, he gets no-bid contracts and the company is going to go back in and rebuild and walk.
	Well, you know, here's another company who wants to do the same type of thing.
	So, Hillstone was part of a $35 billion, 500,000 unit project.
	Hillstone also got a $22 million construction contract from the U.S. State Department.
	The company's founder told investors at a private meeting that it really helps to have, quote, the brother of the vice president as a partner, unquote.
	For the years that James worked with Hillstone, the firm, quote, accumulated contracts from the federal government for dozens of projects, including projects in the United States, Puerto Rico, Mozambique, and elsewhere.
	Quote, unquote. Mozambique and elsewhere.
	He also, um...
	Was hired by Hill International, the parent company of Hillstone, to, quote, negotiate with the Saudis over a secret $140 million deal.
	So, because of his relationship with Vice President Joe Biden.
	Do you think anything's going to happen?
	Did anything ever happen to Dick Cheney and Halliburton stuff?
	No bid contracts with that?
	As Vice President, of course?
	No. Anything going to happen with this?
	No. And you're talking about a $140 million deal with the Saudis?
	This chump changed based on what Jared Kushner did with the Saudis.
	Was that pay off for the so-called Abraham Accords?
	Folks, again, Washington is hopelessly corrupt.
	Hopelessly corrupt. We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to...
	Trump Burger Forever says we need corn pop now more than ever.
	We'll take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Well, I want to say thank you to Gregory A., I'm going to mention the last name, who sent a very generous tip on Zell this morning.
	And he said it was for Annabelle's birthday, so happy birthday, Annabelle.
	And thank you so much.
	People give me gifts for their birthday.
	I just... I can't imagine.
	But thank you so much. I appreciate that.
	And thank you for listening.
	And we have Angry Tiger.
	Thank you for the tip, Angry Tiger.
	He says, all the mass garbage is conjecture and marginalizes genuine criticism.
	I looked at that and I thought, I'm thinking first the medical mass stuff.
	But of course it applies to that as well as the supposedly rubber mask that Biden is wearing.
	You know, the masks, the little cloth masks and bandanas that we were told we had to wear.
	That was all conjecture.
	And it was done to marginalize criticism of the so-called pandemic.
	But yeah, this whole thing about the rubber masks on Biden and all the rest of the stuff, it really is ridiculous.
	And the people who put that up, and I think it was, I don't know if it was Friday that I saw that, I think.
	And it was just everywhere on Twitter.
	It's like, This is all being done in Echo Chamber.
	A lot of people believe it, just to discredit any criticism.
	You're right, Angry Tiger. It says it's Halloween 24-7 in Washington, D.C., mask or no mask.
	We can see their souls, and that's ugly enough.
	That's right, absolutely true.
	A Syrian girl says, I guess happy days are here again for us retirees whose salaries have been looted through decades of hard work.
	Oh, yeah, absolutely. Yeah, it amazes me.
	I was just thinking about that.
	In terms of sense, even, you know, oh, well, it's your retirement.
	We've got your account here at Social Security.
	Like, yeah, tell me about it.
	This is how much is set aside for you.
	No, it isn't. And besides the fact, you know, if you had a private IRA, you could pass that on to your family or whatever, but, you know, the money that they put into this Social Security thing, you can't.
	And not only that, but if it's not enough for you to live on, and if you have to get a job, then they cut your Social Security benefits.
	So if you make any money, they just take it away.
	So, you know, if it was some kind of retirement thing, you'd be able to have that and work part-time and be able to supplement it.
	The whole thing is just a lie.
	And again, where did it come from?
	It came from Germany.
	Bismarck, you know, the guy who said, you don't want to see, he said, you don't want, just like sausages, you don't want to see how laws are made.
	Well, we've seen how the Social Security thing was made.
	They picked 65 because that was the age of life expectancy in Germany at the time.
	They were going to tax people for this stuff, give you a promise that, normally we'll pay for this in your old age, and they set it at the age they expected everybody to die.
	By the way, we're going to be talking about excess deaths today.
	Some important things happening on that front in the U.K., And important things happening to penetrate the legal immunity of the vaccine companies, even penetrating the PrEP Act.
	We've got now another way that a PrEP Act can be penetrated besides fraud, and I think this one might be even more powerful.
	We'll talk about that coming up.
	But Bismarck picked the age of 65.
	And it's one of the reasons why they keep saying, we've got to raise the age.
	We've got to raise the age. Because, you know, now if people are living longer, they may have to actually pay us something.
	It's always been a lie. It's always been a head fake.
	So, Caboose888 says, nightclub owner equals money laundering.
	That's why they put that there.
	Exactly. And, of course, that's true in spades about casinos, isn't it?
	And even with that, Trump can't keep the things solvent?
	What does that say about his business acumen that he can't even make money with a money laundering casino where they set the rules?
	Pretty amazing.
	About inflation, Michael De Silvio says that's why people are moving to Argentina.
	I don't know. I didn't know if they were or not, but they might be moving to Argentina because they're worried about what is coming next.
	With a nuclear exchange or deliberate meltdown of America, if that's what is happening.
	About corn pop, Brad Scott says, Joe fought with a chain, a rusty razor, and a rain barrel.
	There you go. That's the legend of corn pop.
	Uncle DiSolvio says he was a bad dude and he ran with a bunch of bad boys.
	Corn pop could fix all this if he could just get him off of meth that says no truth in them.
	Yeah, that's right. Yeah, we need corn pop for president.
	And I'm still wondering about all those people used to feel Joe's legs as a lifeguard.
	Just filled with one perverse, weird story after the other.
	When we talk about politics, the RNC debate, they're coming up to a third one.
	And after this last one, Vivek Ramaswamy is thinking he might skip it like Trump.
	Hey, it's working out really good for Trump.
	No, in order for this to work, Ramaswamy, you're going to have to get indicted and portray yourself as a victim.
	And make it all about yourself.
	You talk too much about issues.
	But no, I think all of them...
	They should all raise their hand if they don't want to participate in another one of these Fox farce debates.
	Call it farce news.
	The most ridiculous things I've ever seen.
	And the first two debates.
	Raise your hand. Who would you vote off the aisle and all the rest of the stuff?
	And DeSantis has said, come on, let's have a little bit of respect for us.
	We came here to debate issues.
	They don't even ask him any questions about any real issues.
	And of course, there was a big back and forth.
	With kind of a screaming exchange completely out of control because the moderators can't even keep control of that.
	There's no serious discussion of issues.
	There never has been any of these debates.
	It's always been about gotchas and the rest of this stuff, which is one of the ways that Trump does so well.
	Because he's all about personal insults, soundbites, and all the rest of the stuff.
	Policy? Forget about it. They're not going to seriously debate a policy.
	We all know what a debate looks like, right?
	You typically have it over one subject, and you have one person takes the affirmative on some issue, and then the other person disagrees with them, and they're interrogated by the moderator, and then they have opportunities to ask the other person questions.
	You have none of that. None of that.
	And the issues that they pull up are always the same old issues.
	There's nothing in there about global IDs or CBDC or the rest of this stuff.
	We have all kinds of new threats to our freedom and liberty that are happening.
	All new measures of executive orders that are happening.
	The regulatory state is assuming all new kinds of powers.
	Nobody's going to talk about that.
	Nobody's even going to talk about the fundamental premise behind the MacGuffins.
	Is there really man-made climate change?
	No, they're not going to debate that.
	That'd be an interesting thing to see debated between the Republicans, even, because most Republicans are going to buy into that.
	But you're not going to have any debate over the prescriptions for this phony MacGuffin, the climate MacGuffin, or for the prescriptions for the phony pandemic.
	You're not going to have any of that there.
	Pence, there was a very long article from Politico, more than a dozen pages printed out, about how he was once a favorite of the right.
	No, who wasn't? He never was.
	And he got put in as vice president, not because he had any success when he was running in 2016, but simply because Trump needed to whitewash his casino background, his playboy background, his throwing his wives under the bus background, all the rest of this stuff.
	He needed to whitewash that for the evangelicals, and he could use Pence to do that.
	But Pence has always been.
	A warmonger in the extreme.
	And he carries all of the baggage.
	Okay.
	It's back. It's back.
	I don't know what happened. But anyway, he carries all the baggage of the Trump term.
	But, you know, there isn't any forgiveness for him from the MAGA cult because he turned on Trump.
	And so, since he betrayed the MAGA messiah, He is now the Judas goat for this cult.
	He doesn't stand a chance, as they point out, he can't even get a crowd of 15 people to Pizza Planet.
	Of course, it's Pizza Ranch there, you know.
	It might as well be Pizza Planet because all the little stooges are there.
	It's like, Trump is our master.
	The claw is our master.
	So as we look at the House in disarray, we had Jim Jordan had three different rounds of voting, and now he is out.
	The first time, he lost by 20 votes.
	He did a second one, he lost by 22.
	He said, I'm not going to do a third one.
	Then he changed his mind, and they had a third one.
	He lost by 25, so they got rid of him.
	Now they've got nine candidates that are stepping up there.
	Only two of them do I know anything about.
	Byron Donalds, who has been focused, and they like him a lot on LifeSite because he's been very strong about pro-life, pro-family issues.
	He said, I believe, as stated in our Declaration of Independence, that each person is endowed by a creator with certain inalienable rights.
	The first among those is the right to life.
	Life, every life is valuable from conception to natural death, and I will fight to protect the life of every unborn child without exception.
	He says, in Congress, I will work with my colleagues to turn the culture in our country against the killing of innocent unborn children, and I pledge to always be strong voice and advocate for life.
	The problem is, is that this is not a federal function.
	And the problem is, is that as I look at this, I'm afraid there's a lot of people in the Republican Party, and it's being driven by a lot of these pro-life organizations, which are very concerned that they're going to lose a lot of their financial support and membership after the Dobbs decision which are very concerned that they're going to lose a lot of their financial support and where it belongs. And if you put it in the federal government, it is going to actually be a threat.
	Murder is a state function.
	And there's nowhere in the Constitution that it gives the power to the federal government, whether it is the Supreme Court, which is what the Supreme Court said with Dobbs, is that we don't have the authority to do this.
	This belongs in the state.
	And now you've got a lot of Republicans who have always used this as a wedge issue to get elected to federal office.
	They want to claw that back.
	And you've got a lot of big pro-life organizations which have always used this to justify their existence, and they want to claw it back.
	In the same way that you've got some gun organizations that I think really don't want to see gun control go away completely.
	They want it to be a constant, persistent thing.
	You know, it's like you had Goldman Sachs say about Gilead when they came up with that hepatitis variant drug that got rid of it.
	They said, that's not our business model.
	We don't want to cure any diseases.
	We want to treat chronic diseases.
	And that's the way a lot of these Second Amendment and pro-life organizations are.
	They want a chronic, persistent problem.
	They don't want to fix it.
	And so, and again, it's not their jurisdiction.
	You know, we have murder that is rampant in Chicago, don't we?
	Well, maybe we should declare that illegal.
	Would that fix it? No.
	No. And, again, the federal government doesn't have any jurisdiction there.
	If they can't even fix murder in Washington, D.C., if they can't even travel safely from the Capitol to their own homes, staffers are getting carjacked and shot and all the rest of this stuff all the time.
	Another person that is there that I know something about is the House Whip, Emmer.
	He has a big CBDC opponent.
	And again, money is a federal issue.
	And the big issue is the Federal Reserve.
	Federal Reserve needs to...
	The Federal... CBDC is running through the Federal Reserve.
	Federal Reserve is metastasizing its power over us.
	And they need to be ended.
	He's not going that far.
	He's not talking about that, but the Federal Reserve needs to be ended, but CBDC needs to be stopped, and at least he talks about that.
	So we'll have to see if anybody there can get the votes.
	The House of Representatives really does represent our divided country at this point in time, the GOP especially.
	GOP is heavily divided, typically over Trump.
	And I think that Jim Jordan's association with Trump worked against him in that, certainly.
	Most people would agree with that, whether they like Trump or not.
	They would agree that that had a big influence on that.
	Thank you very much, Eric.
	I appreciate the tip. Thank you.
	That's on Rockfin and on Rumble.
	Way cool Snoopy.
	Thank you very much. I appreciate that.
	Hope all are having a great start to a brand new week.
	He says, well, thank you. Appreciate both of those.
	Thank you very much. Brad Scott says, cooperation, hospital prisons, and 15-minute blue cities coming soon.
	Flee to the mountains, raise rabbits, catfish, and chickens, and garden with heirloom seeds.
	Well, I got the first part of that.
	We have fled to the mountains.
	Did you see that they're now projecting...
	That Houston, Dallas, and Austin, and I forget the time frame.
	I wasn't thinking about talking about it.
	But that they're going to be the three biggest cities?
	Is that something to be excited about if you're in Texas?
	Flee to the mountains.
	I saw that coming.
	You know, just imagine if you had one state that, again, these three cities are going to replace LA, Chicago, and New York.
	Think about what a literal hellhole it would be to have LA, New York, and Chicago in one state.
	That's what's coming for Texas.
	Truly amazing.
	RFK. One last article here, one last issue about elections.
	RFK Jr.'s presidential bid hinges on ballot access.
	Well, maybe it hinges on reparations, but we'll talk about that in a moment.
	But yes, it does hinge on ballots.
	I have said from the very beginning of this, and of course, after the 2016, during the 2016 election cycles, when you had the Republican Party of Utah, in an effort to block Trump, brought in Smartmatic.
	And I talked about the history of Smartmatic being created by some friends of Hugo Chavez and The fact that Venezuela, the fact that they, you know, spread out all over the place, have been involved in accusations of rigged elections and fraud in the Philippines and Brazil and multiple provinces and Mexico and many other places, even before all this, and Republicans brought them in to run the election.
	GOP primary to try to push Trump out.
	I mean, the Republicans in Utah tried everything they could.
	They even got this CIA guy, Evan Mullins or McMullen or something to run against him.
	But I said, you know, the 2020 election, I said in the aftermath of it, I said the 2020 election is going to be a hacking contest.
	And that's the real issue.
	As long as you're going to have... Electronic voting machines.
	It doesn't matter who makes them.
	It is going to be a hacking contest.
	No doubt about it.
	Are you going to be able to keep those elections secure?
	The CIA can't keep its Vault 7 stuff secure, right?
	Both the manual and then eventually the code of Vault 7 was released.
	People stole it from the CIA and the NSA. Their blueprint for how they could impersonate any country.
	You know, we've had these situations.
	Oh, we know it's from Russia. How do we know it's from Russia?
	Well, we can look at the keystrokes or whatever, you know.
	Well, they have a way that they can fake that.
	And now everybody on Earth Can fake it.
	Why? Because the CIA couldn't protect its own data.
	And the NSA couldn't protect its own data.
	If the CIA and the NSA can't protect something that they really want to protect, they really do want to protect that.
	You know, the blueprints about how they cheat and impersonate.
	If they can't protect that, do you think they can protect the elections even if they wanted to?
	And of course they don't.
	They want to penetrate the elections as well.
	And then we added a whole new wrinkle of fraud with the vote-by-mail stuff.
	But I said from the very beginning of this, you know, all of this January the 6th stuff in the aftermath of the 2020 election, I said, look, rigged election, The election rigging begins with ballot access and debate access.
	And this is what this article from Zero Hedge is about.
	RFK Jr.'s presidential bid hinges on ballot access.
	I know a lot about this because the Libertarian Party has gotten very good at getting on the ballot, understanding all of these 50 states have 50 different rules for how to get on the ballot.
	Some of them are very draconian.
	They have a lot of arcane rules and all the rest of the stuff.
	And they've been able to get on the ballot in 50 states quite a few times, but they still can't get into the debates.
	And they wind up spending all of their time just trying to get on and money trying to get on to the ballot.
	And then when you get on to the ballot, they have rules about retention for a political party.
	And you've got to get, you know, 2%, 4%, 5% or whatever of the vote that they had for president or for governor to stay on the ballot typically.
	Yeah.
	And so it becomes like this task of Sisyphus, the Greek mythology where this guy was tasked with rolling this boulder up the top of the hill.
	As soon as he'd get up to the top of the hill, it would roll back down.
	And that's what this is like. Ballot access is like that every single time.
	The Libertarian Party spends all of its time on ballot access.
	They don't have any money or time really left over for campaigning.
	That's what this is for.
	And so they point out in this article...
	That he's already drawing a hefty 16% in a three-way contest, according to polls.
	However, all the public support in the world will mean nothing unless he can get on the ballot in 50 states and the District of Columbia.
	And it's about more than just gathering signatures.
	It's about a lot of stuff.
	And of course, would he then be able to get into a debate?
	I don't think there'll be a debate.
	Neither Biden nor Trump are proud enough of their record to defend it.
	And they don't want to talk about the new issues that both of them have brought to attack our freedom and to attack the Constitution.
	Both of them have surfaced brand new attacks on the Constitution.
	They don't want to debate any of that stuff.
	And so they said, consider the fact that the No Labels Party is newly formed, a bunch of people really on the left, They don't like labels, but that's an appropriate label to apply to them, I think.
	The No Labels Party has been at it for two years, and they say that they will complete the process for 28 states by New Year's.
	They hope that they can get on the ballot in 50 states by the election.
	Well, good luck with that.
	Signature requirements vary wildly.
	Kennedy has to get 200,000 signatures in California, but he only needs 275 in Tennessee.
	Kind of gives you an idea of where the freedom is, doesn't it?
	You can't have freedom if you don't have free access to the ballot.
	Yeah, 275.
	That's amazingly low.
	I could even run for president, but I'm not going to.
	Get caught up in that nonsense.
	Talk about chasing your tail.
	Many states add an extra level of complexity by requiring that a group of people signing the ballot petition represent various parts of the state.
	See, that's the kind of rules that they add.
	It isn't even just the number of them.
	And you're not going to be able to do this unless you hire professional petition people.
	There's no way that you can do that.
	As a matter of fact, in North Carolina, they don't have this in the article.
	But in North Carolina, people who signed it, if they read what they were signing, and you'd hand out the stuff to people, you'd say, can you sign this?
	We'd like to get our candidate on the ballot.
	You'd present it that way, and hope that they don't read the language Because the language of the petition says, I want to join the Libertarian Party and become a supporter of it, which is forced on us by the state of North Carolina.
	You had to essentially say, yes, I want to essentially become a party member.
	And, of course, nobody wants that.
	They want to have the option to More than two people to vote for, but they don't want to buy into some political party.
	So you hope that they don't read that.
	But you have to, it costs now typically $7 to $10 per signature.
	That's what you have to pay these signature gatherers.
	That's gone up significantly in 30 years, I'll tell you that.
	The collectors need to have very thick skin as they're prone to being confronted by party loyalists angered over an independent's potential spoiler role.
	To defend their duopoly, Democrat and Republican parties will routinely file legal challenges against independent candidates.
	We saw this with the petitions to recall Eric Gascon, the corrupt Soros district attorney in L.A. that people really hated.
	And they got more than the required number of signatures, but the Democrats kept challenging them.
	Until they got the numbers down below.
	They didn't have enough. You have to have a huge cushion over those signatures because they're going to challenge them.
	200,000 signatures? Well, you better get three times that amount of signatures.
	It's not yet obvious which party has the most to lose from Kennedy's presence.
	And here's why I think everybody's saying, well, I think he's going to take votes away from Trump.
	Again, I don't care. I don't support either one of these guys.
	But I'll tell you this. I don't think that after he's come out full-throated in support of reparations, reparations last week, I don't think there's going to be any Republican support for him.
	Because he's already come out against the Supreme Court decision that said you're not going to have racial quotas for college admission.
	He wants racial quotas.
	Because as a Kennedy, he's already secured, right?
	Get into Harvard, anywhere he wants to go.
	And then when it comes to reparations, this is unworkable.
	The whole point of reparations is to create racial tension.
	It is absolutely unworkable.
	You're going to disadvantage people in a huge way, based on the color of their skin, or give them a huge advantage based on the color of their skin.
	You're going to disadvantage people who came here long after slavery had ended.
	Their ancestors or whatever.
	And how do you assess whether somebody, you know, how much of your DNA has to be black versus white?
	And how does that work out in America?
	Well, you're not going to be able to.
	It's just a formula for grievances.
	Even before the Hamas attack on Israel stirred that issue, Kennedy had alienated progressives and non-interventionists with full-thread support for Israel that went well beyond the level of lip service that is deemed to be mandatory for politicians.
	So, again, he's anti-colonizer there.
	But here in America, he's anti-colonizer, because that's what the reparation stuff is about.
	That's saying that anybody who's got white skin is a colonizer.
	Anybody who has white skin is responsible for slavery and so forth.
	But now he has called reparations for black people, full-throated support for it.
	He calls it direct redress payments.
	Well, how are you going to figure out who to pay?
	Again, Obama, half black, half white.
	His daughters then, you know...
	You know, do they get a lower share of this stuff?
	What do they get, you know?
	You look at Angela Davis, radical black Marxist.
	She's half white.
	Does she get reparations?
	It is a formula for division.
	That's all it is about.
	Brad Scott says RFK is playing a 4D chess to take away votes from Biden, according to Alex.
	Alex is playing a 4D chess game on people, and the pawns don't realize it.
	I wouldn't believe a thing that Alex Jones says.
	Alex Jones has endorsed RFK Jr.
	He's endorsed DeSantis.
	He's trashed Trump multiple times, then followed by groveling at Trump's feet.
	Alex Jones is nothing but...
	A weather vane. A lying disinformation agent about these elections, about the vaccines, about everything.
	Don't believe anything that Alex said.
	I was there. I saw it.
	And I can tell you for certain, don't believe a thing that grifting crook says about anything.
	My son says, the NSA doesn't want the general public knowing about their classes and how to lie, cheat, and steal.
	That's right. That was Pompeo.
	Yeah. When I was at West Point, they told us, we don't lie, we don't cheat, we don't steal, and we don't tolerate people who do.
	They said, I went to the CIA, and they said, and we had classes on all that stuff.
	And the thing that bothered me was that the people at Texas A&M liked that.
	I thought it was despicable.
	It's true. It's true.
	And it's despicable that it's true.
	Even if they could figure out exactly who had ancestors, says my son, who had slaves, who were slaves, It would still be unjust to punish people for what their distant ancestors did.
	Oh, absolutely. That's right.
	That's right. It's unjust on its face, and it's unworkable in its application.
	We'll be right back. You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	What we learnt from this climate, this COVID crisis, we will be applying to the climate crisis, to the housing crisis, to reconciliation, to making sure that everyone has good jobs.
	Can you explain what a MacGuffin is?
	Yes, a MacGuffin you see in most films about spies.
	This is a thing that the spies are after.
	In the days of Rudyard Kipling, it would be the plans of the fort on the Khyber Pass.
	It would be the plans of an airplane engine, anything you like.
	It's always called the thing that the characters on the screen worry about, but the audience don't care.
	Someone asked, what is a MacGuffin?
	And it's described in a scene in an English train going to Scotland.
	And one man says to the other opposite him, he said, what's that package above your head there?
	And the other man said, oh, that's a MacGuffin.
	He said, what is a MacGuffin?
	He said, well, it's an apparatus for trapping lions in the Scottish Highlands.
	Man said, but there are no lions in the Scottish Highlands.
	He said, then that's no MacGuffin.
	Thank you for clearing that up for us.
	Yeah, let's clear that up for people.
	Let's clear up the fact there's no lines on the Scottish Highlands.
	There is no pandemic.
	And there's no man-made global warming.
	Let's just cut to the chase on all this stuff.
	And, of course, we put that together.
	The MacGuffin t-shirt that we have, if you go to The David Knight Show.
	All it has is The David Knight Show and MacGuffin.
	And... Of course, it's an opportunity for you to tell people, recount that little story from Alfred Hitchcock, and explain to them how we're being played.
	The only thing that matters is what we can use to motivate the characters, to motivate the public, and let's use some fear and lies to do that.
	And a good example of this is a man that we're going to be talking about coming up as well, Andrew Bridgen, who is in the U.K., I did a great job.
	He's been tireless in trying to expose the excess deaths from the vaccines, from the Trump shots.
	But he also understands the other MacGuffin, the climate MacGuffin, and the vehicles.
	Let me play this aspect of it before we get to the pharmaceutical stuff.
	I'm Andrew Bridgen. When governments announced they've identified problems that face the public and simultaneously announced that they've identified the only possible solution, I'm always a little sceptical.
	Twenty years ago, the then Labour government announced that diesel vehicles were best for the environment.
	Today, as we know, they're vilified and effectively being taxed off the road.
	We're now told that electric vehicles are our only salvation.
	Despite growing concerns about their safety and real questions about the true environmental cost of manufacturing and disposing of their lithium batteries, so could we have a debate on the costs and benefits of electric vehicles?
	Yes, and of course, the problem is that just like Trump and Biden, nobody in the UK wants to debate him on anything either.
	He asked more than 20 times for a debate on the health effects of the vaccine.
	Nobody ever gave him a debate.
	He finally, they capitulated and let him read a statement to an empty parliament.
	And we'll talk about that.
	It was a very detailed statement that he fully documented about the excess deaths.
	But he's pointing out, you'll be very careful when the government tells you we got one solution for this problem.
	And what we typically see is that When they do that, there's not even a real problem that you need to have solved.
	And so electric cars may become uninsurable.
	Yeah, how about that?
	Electric cars, and this is in the UK, electric cars risk becoming effectively uninsurable as analysts struggle to put a price on battery repairs, according to a researcher for the car insurance industry.
	Just a minor fender bender.
	And now, the insurance company is not sure whether or not you've got to change all of the batteries, because if you've just got one of them that's been compromised in some way, and it may not be obvious at this moment, that could catch fire and cause runaway combustion.
	And so, they typically wind up, you've got a minor fender bender, well, you get a $40,000 bill if you've got a Rivian.
	Part of it is the fact that you've got a lot of new automobile manufacturers who are not all that savvy about setting up the car so that the individual parts can be replaced.
	You know, they're looking at styling and not thinking about serviceability.
	But it's primarily the concerns about a compromised battery.
	They said, from the Insurance Institute, they said, Thatchum Research, they said, a lack of insight and understanding about the cost of repairing damaged electric car batteries is pushing up premiums and resulting in some providers declining to provide cover altogether.
	Well, that fits with the agenda, doesn't it?
	I mean, this is not about banning internal combustion engines.
	That's what the climate MacGuffin is telling us.
	No, this is about banning all private cars.
	And they've now been saying that out loud.
	They don't want you to have an electric car either.
	And if you do have an electric car, how are you going to be allowed to charge it?
	Because they're taking down...
	The power supplies for the grid itself.
	And you'll wind up having your electric car be used.
	They've already talked about this.
	You go out and spend the money for a very expensive electric car.
	They'll tell you, well, I'm sorry, but you can't Can't drive it.
	We just don't have enough electricity.
	It's too hot. It's too cold.
	And every home is now heated or cooled by electricity.
	Nothing else is allowed.
	So it's all got to come off the grid.
	But now we've shut down our functional fuels.
	And we just have solar and wind, so we don't have enough power for everybody.
	Oh, by the way, we're going to have to use your electric vehicle as battery storage.
	So you can't drive it.
	But you've now got a very expensive battery thing that they will tap to support the grid.
	For cooking, for heating, for everything.
	Everything is all electric.
	Electric cars can be particularly expensive to repair, costing around a quarter more to fix on average than a gas or diesel vehicle.
	Experts have previously warned electric vehicles are to be written off after minor bumps because the cost and complexity of fixing their batteries.
	The person with the Institute Research Institute said the challenge is that we have to find a way of understanding whether the battery has been compromised or damaged in any way.
	If the The threat of thermal runaway means that a catastrophic fire can take place if the cells of the battery have been damaged in a collision.
	We're struggling to understand how we diagnose that.
	It's like a doctor trying to understand what's wrong with you without having any notes or without having an x-ray.
	They're operating blind.
	You've got all these different cells in one of these car batteries, and they don't know how to test them individually to see if any of them have been compromised.
	John Lewis Financial Services in the UK, an insurance company, stopped providing car insurance for electric cars last month for both new and existing customers.
	As its underwriter, analyze risks and costs.
	Another insurance company in the UK, Aviva, removed insurance products for the Tesla Model Y earlier this year before restoring them several months later.
	Why'd they restore them?
	Did they get pressure from the government to do so?
	Because the government wants that illusion that you're going to be allowed to have electric cars if you can just afford them.
	No, you're not.
	The plan, and this has come out very explicitly with C40, the Organization of Cities.
	They're saying, we're going to ban all private cars.
	We're going to ban them all. And, of course, they want everybody living in a city.
	Whether it is a UN World Economic Forum smart city or whether it's a Trump freedom city, it's the same thing, different labels.
	And so they want everybody living in a city, and cities are going to say, you're not going to have a car.
	They want to ban all private vehicles, including EVs.
	You'll rent by the ride from the stakeholders who are allowed to be taxi companies.
	Average electric car insurance costs rose 72% over the last year, compared to insurance costs going up 29% for gas and diesel cars in the UK. That's incredible.
	But of course, that is in line with what we're starting to see with inflation, with food and other things that are essential.
	They manipulate the consumer price index.
	They become masters at it.
	But that is really more in line with what we're seeing with people who go to various stores, even going to Costco and saying, look at this versus a year ago.
	So how much do EV batteries cost if you're going to replace the entire thing?
	Well, there's an interesting graphic That is at Zero Hedge about this.
	And they have a bunch of, there you can see, a bunch of different cars.
	You know, they have a Cadillac Escalade IQ. They have a Tesla Model S. They have a Ram Limited.
	They have a Rivian delivery truck, which is what Amazon is using.
	Several different ones.
	The Mustang Mach-E. The, you know, the...
	SUV, electric SUV, they call a Mustang.
	And then you've got a VW there.
	And it is interesting because you look at the price.
	First, they show you the price of the batteries.
	You know, $22,500, $12,000, $25,853, $13,000 for the Amazon Rivian batteries.
	The two cheap ones were the Mustang, the cheapest one in this table.
	It's the Mustang at $6,900 and the Volkswagen at $8,700.
	But still, you're going to get hit and you're going to get a fender bender and it's going to cost you $6,900 minimum, maybe $25,000.
	Maybe if it's a Rivian pickup truck, $41,000, I think it was, the guy got hit with.
	And so, again, the lowest one in this table is $6,900.
	And the other thing they did in the table was they looked at the percentage of the vehicle's cost when it's new that the battery represented.
	And, of course, one of the reasons why they differ so much in terms of cost is because of battery capacity.
	You know, if you've got a really big, heavy vehicle, you're going to have to have a really big, heavy battery, and it's going to be a lot more money.
	But, you know, they range 16% to 24% of the cost of the car new for the ones at the bottom.
	But the one that is the height, even though the Dodge Ram, the electric version...
	I said the $25,853 for the batteries, that's 32% of the cost of that vehicle because it cost $81,000.
	The electric Cadillac cost $130,000.
	The Tesla Model S, $88,000.
	You get the idea. Even the delivery van for Amazon.
	$62,000. Of course, Amazon can afford it.
	So, what are we going to do?
	Well, finally, we have a little bit of good news.
	We finally had some people push back on this car ban thing here in the United States.
	We had two GOP senators, along with Democrat Joe Manchin, put together a bill, and the other 23 Republican senators joined along with it.
	So that's 26.
	That's a majority of senators for this.
	So this is to push back against The regulation without representation by the EPA just saying, well, now here's the new rules of what everybody's going to have to get in terms of fuel economy, and we're going to regulate internal combustion engines out of existence with this new rule.
	This is regulation without representation.
	It's also taxation, if you want to look at it, without representation as the EPA keeps adding these new rules.
	So the people who put this together...
	Said Biden's EPA rule change would hurt everyday Americans while simultaneously helping China.
	That's exactly right. Why do they ever talk about this as being Trump's rule changes with the ATF or something like that?
	Look, it is Biden, the Biden administration.
	The deep state, the regulatory state, is under the executive branch.
	And Biden is responsible for it.
	And so was Trump.
	But nobody will hold Trump responsible.
	In the conservative circles.
	Of course, this is Fox News.
	And it is really beyond belief how Fox News is still pushing this man-made climate change stuff throughout this article.
	Fox News is on the other side.
	Joe Manchin and the two Republicans put this together, but now all the Republicans have become co-sponsors of introducing legislation to block the Biden administration from regulations that would effectively ban internal combustion engines.
	They call their bill...
	The CARS Act.
	Isn't that cute?
	As they always do.
	Stands for Choice and Automobile Retail Sales.
	So this would strike down the EPA's proposal unveiled earlier this year that would significantly tighten vehicle tailpipe emission restrictions.
	And they said, once again, the Biden administration's rulemaking process We need to have a better explanation of this.
	It's not a rules-making process.
	Congress doesn't do anything, typically.
	As I said many times...
	All of the laws are being done by unelected bureaucrats.
	They call them rules.
	When they call them rules, then that means that they get to decide if you violated the rules that they wrote, these unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats.
	And if they say that you violated those, not only do you have no presumption of innocence, and all this stuff began with the IRS. It's the way the IRS has operated for the longest time.
	Now they're all doing it. You have no presumption of innocence.
	You're guilty and you have to prove that you're innocent.
	You have no due process.
	You have no protection against excessive fines.
	And they will determine, the people who wrote these rules, will determine whether or not you are guilty or not.
	And we see this with all the different organizations.
	This is a regulatory state.
	And what you see happening here is that when the...
	And they want it to be this way.
	When the regulatory state gets way out of line...
	Then these people will come in and rescue you from that particular issue, but they will never rescue you from the regulatory state.
	They don't want to do that.
	As a matter of fact, we've had people in the House as well as Rand Paul used to on a regular basis would introduce what Rand Paul called the RAINS Act to reign in Congress, to reign in the regulatory state.
	And he could get one or two people to sign on to it in the Senate, and somebody would introduce it in the House, and they'd get one or two spots.
	Nobody wants to do anything about this.
	They like the way this thing works.
	And so the question is, it looks like they may be able to get it through unless they start to put in this 60 rule.
	I don't know if that would apply with this or not.
	They do have a simple majority.
	Will they need to have 60 votes in order to get cloture on this?
	I don't know if they're going to play that game with it or not.
	They may. And then if they can get it through the Senate, is there anybody in the House?
	Is there anybody home in the House to do anything about it?
	No, they're still fighting over who's going to get to be the leader.
	In April, says Fox News, the EPA proposed regulations that were the most aggressive for federal tailpipe emissions ever crafted.
	It finalized and implemented a staggering 67% of new sedans, crossovers, SUVs, and light trucks, up to 50% of bus and garbage trucks, 35% of short-haul freight tractors, and 25% of long-haul freight tractors, the semi-trailers. It would have to be electric by 2032.
	And so critics are saying that what they're doing is, of course, forcing future purchases of zero-carbon vehicles.
	And that's exactly what it is.
	So that part of it is objective, and I agree with what they're saying.
	Manchin said, I waited in line for gas in the 1970s because America was too reliant on foreign oil.
	And I refuse to risk one day waiting in line for a Chinese battery.
	Well, that's good.
	But it's actually, what about having to wait in line to power your electric car off of the grid?
	Because the APA is shutting down the grid as well.
	Shutting down, just as we got functional, more affordable cars, and they're shutting that down.
	They're also doing the same thing to the power plants that power the grid.
	In addition to the two Republican senators, Crapo and Ricketts, and Manchin, 23, Republicans have become co-sponsors.
	That's 26. It's a simple majority.
	Would they have to get cloture? I don't know.
	But... As they point out, the average cost of an EV was $65,000 versus an internal combustion engine, which was $48,000.
	Oh, yeah. You know, we all have another $17,000 to get a functionally equivalent car, right?
	And what's the difference between these things?
	Well, one of them is zero emissions.
	So instead of paying $48,000, you ought to pay another $17,000.
	Increase the cost of the car by about 50% almost.
	The Department of Energy reported that the average range of a model year 2021 gas vehicles was 403 miles.
	The median range for the EVs that year was 234 miles.
	Now, there's even some games being played with this.
	You notice that? I said the average versus the median range.
	So they play games with that.
	And I imagine that the Department of Energy used that apples to oranges comparison.
	An average is not the median.
	A median is half of the things are above this and half of them are below this number.
	Average can be very distorted by one high thing or one low thing.
	That's why they typically talk about median home prices, because if you've got somebody who's got, you know, you've got Brett Berry's got his house on the market in Washington, D.C. for $32 million, a record, by the way.
	That's going to distort the average.
	But it really won't distort the median price that much in Washington, D.C. These statisticians know how to manipulate the numbers, and that's what they're doing with this.
	Going back, before I continue on with this, let me catch up on some of the comments.
	I was talking about reparations before.
	Audi, Modern Retro Radio, says, I don't know a single black person who's even the slightest interest in reparations, and Audi is black.
	He said, these blacks that you see on TV advocating it are government-paid divide-and-conquer sellouts.
	Well, that's true. That absolutely is true.
	And so it is set to divide and conquer.
	That's all this is about.
	Amos Poole, thank you very much for the tip on Roxanne.
	I appreciate that. He says, after your description, it sounds like AJ would make a great president.
	Yeah. Just watch out for the finances there.
	But Jason Barker, of course, that's also a qualification for president, I guess, with Biden there.
	Jason Barker says, there's always a percentage of factory defects in any industry.
	The larger batteries get, the higher the chance of a critical failure, since they're made up of thousands of small cells.
	And this is the thing that really concerns me about the battery energy storage sites, BESS, that they're putting around.
	They say, well, you know, if we're going to go with solar and wind, of course, that was a big issue.
	They never had a way to back up solar and wind.
	And so you had to cycle up and down the working power plants, which, just like your car, if you're driving your car in stop-and-go city traffic, you're going to get less fuel economy versus keeping it in a steady state on the interstate.
	And so that meant that these power plants, in order to do backup for the solar and wind, were actually using more fuel, producing more emissions if we really care about it.
	But we don't. Shouldn't care about that.
	Because you should care if it's dirty and we can scrub that.
	That's fine. CO2 is a canard.
	It's a lie. And we've got to call that out.
	You know, these little emperors who are ruling us have no clothes.
	This is naked tyranny.
	And we've got to call BS on this justification on their so-called pandemic that they've got.
	Trump Burger forever says if they didn't provide the tax credits, quote-unquote, nobody would buy them.
	Nobody could afford to buy them. And I don't think anybody can afford to buy them now.
	They're cutting back production.
	All the electric car companies are cutting back production.
	Even the other car companies are cutting back production because things are getting tough right now.
	And it's absurd that you're going to increase the cost of your cars by 40 to 50% for the, you know, to stop unicorn farts or something.
	It's ridiculous. Big Brit is back again.
	It says they're now ditching tax incentives on EVs, plus the weight of the EVs are destroying roads.
	That's it. It's everything. It's the weight of the roads.
	So we're going to have to redesign parking lots because, you know, these things catch fire and they explode.
	So we've got to keep the cars further apart, melt everything down.
	It's everything. Everything.
	You know, the Democratic Congo, the Democratic Republic of Congo, where they got children working in slave conditions.
	Getting cobalt and other stuff like that.
	Nobody looks at the efficiency of this.
	Nobody looks at what it's going to take to recycle this stuff.
	We're talking about planned obsolescence.
	That's the EV stuff in spades.
	Audi, MRR, the 2% compliance.
	So the latest booster tells me people are awake.
	Yes. And we're going to talk about the pharmaceutical MacGuffin here in a moment.
	Handy, good to see you there.
	It says, doesn't cycling charge cycles as a battery for the grid?
	It's going to degrade the life of the batteries as well?
	Oh, absolutely. And Jason Barker's right.
	He got on that. He said, yeah, the partial charging and fast charging expedites battery degradation as well.
	As a matter of fact, I had an engineer who worked for Ford contacted me and said, you know, this fast charging stuff.
	Degrades the battery so much so that there was talk at Ford about, well, maybe we need to start recording how many fast charges people do.
	And say, if you do more than X number of fast charges, it degrades your warranty.
	Because they're worried about it.
	They're worried that a lot of fast charging is going to degrade the batteries while they're still under warranty.
	And Jason Barker says, Georgia is making plans to build the EV tolls, which will include large batteries.
	It's such a racket.
	It's all about the money.
	Show me the money. Just like with the vaccine stuff, right?
	Show me the money. Everybody was making a fortune.
	The hospitals are making a fortune killing people.
	The hospital death protocols.
	The vaccine companies are making a fortune.
	Everybody was making money off of it.
	The governors were getting money that was many times what the entire state budget was from Trump to keep pushing the emergency on and on and on.
	It's all about the money, especially in America.
	Why? Because we can just print money out of thin air.
	Eventually, reality is going to catch up to us.
	We're going to have that Looney Tunes moment where you're off the ledge and you've been running on the air for quite a while, and then at one point you look down and you see there's nothing under you.
	That is a great metaphor for the nonsense that the stock markets and governments do all the time.
	That's the only place where that really happens in real life, but that really does happen in real life, that Looney Tunes moment.
	Michael Pomeroy says, I can confirm that a person in my wife's office had the Rivian shipped to California.
	The company scratched the body on the way out, and it cost $18,000.
	Wow! That's what I'm saying.
	A lot of this, just scratching the body, that didn't affect the battery, but You know, when you look at the amateur way that they put together a lot of this stuff, and as I pointed out, this Cybertruck with all the flat panels...
	And everybody in the automotive industry is saying, this is a real amateur move.
	It's going to show any slight defect.
	That's one of the reasons why they put curves in it, so that you don't see that kind of stuff.
	One of the things I talked about was electric.
	Garbage trucks will be banned by the EPA, and I like what Jason Barker said.
	Electric trash truck?
	Talk about a dumpster fire.
	Yeah, a dumpster fire on wheels.
	It's like Christine, you know.
	The world's electric grids are incapable of supporting renewable energy goals, says an agency.
	So it's not just the fact that they're putting everything on the grid.
	No gas ranges, no gas heating, no nothing.
	Everything's got to be all electric, plus the cars and everything else.
	And then we're going to shut down the power plants because we're saying they're going to be emitting CO2 or something.
	And now we've got another thing.
	And that is, I said, well, you know, we're out there.
	We've got all this federal money and we're making all these solar farms and all these windmill farms and all the rest of stuff.
	But now we've got to get the wires out there, the infrastructure, to pull in the electricity from these power plants.
	These boondoggle projects, the crony capitalism, all the rest of this stuff.
	We've got billions of dollars, government subsidy to create the solar farms and the wind farms and everything.
	And we've got to get the electricity from that.
	And that's what they did in Texas.
	In Texas, they spent billions of dollars.
	You know, these... Billionaires who want to become centi-billionaires, they go out and do these projects and get federal funds to subsidize them to put together these solar farms and wind farms, and then they want the taxpayer to subsidize them some more and to run the power lines out to these farms.
	Electricity grid capacity available in the world is not keeping pace with the rapid growth of quote-unquote clean energy technologies.
	Yeah, see, they can keep building these things out there, and then they want us to run the infrastructure to them.
	And they're saying, you're not doing it quickly enough.
	At least 3,000 gigawatts.
	Or is that gigawatts, Marty?
	And so, I like what...
	Thank you for the tip.
	Real... Realtor Dan Grimes.
	Thank you very much for the tip. I had to unpack that.
	It's all together. No spaces.
	He says, sounds like Brett Baer with his $32 million home in D.C. is going to put together an offer on Mar-a-Lago.
	Yeah. If he can get it for the price that the people in New York, the DA in New York and others say that it's worth.
	Of course, Trump thinks it's worth a billion dollars there.
	But it's sentimental value, I think.
	Who knows what it's worth?
	Anyway, yeah, 3,000 gigawatts of renewable power projects, of which 1,500 gigawatts are in advanced stages.
	And they're waiting for grid connection.
	Equivalent to five times the amount of solar and wind capacity added in 2022, says the report.
	So again, these billionaires who get their tax subsidies and all the rest of this stuff now, you know, build the bridge out to where I put the farm out there.
	Narrowway Narrowgate Ministries says after they get rid of combustion engines, they'll try to ban combustion horses.
	Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. Especially.
	Especially. They can't stand the competition of flatulence and excrement coming from the horses.
	Yeah, that's right.
	In 2015...
	Paris Climate Accords agreed to hold global increases on average temperature to one and a half degrees.
	This is just nonsense, right?
	And again, so now they're wringing their hands in this report, saying, we're not going to be able to do this because we're building all of these wind and solar farms, but you're not getting the wire out to us.
	Well, you know what?
	China and India...
	Continue to be able to build as many of coal and oil power plants and natural gas power plants.
	They can build as many of them as they want.
	And they don't have to make them clean, you know, just like a car.
	You can have a car that has very clean emissions, internal combustion engine, very clean emissions.
	You can go the expense of cleaning it all up.
	Diesel as well. But they don't even have to do that.
	You know, it'd be like you having to buy the latest, you know, if they even make them anymore, Mercedes diesel, that blue tech stuff in it that scrubs everything and super expensive technology.
	You have to buy that, you know, spend, I don't know, $100,000, $150,000 or something.
	But your neighbor...
	He's going to be allowed on the road with something that's got the same kind of emission controls as a two-cycle lawnmower engine, which is to say nothing.
	And he's going to be puttering along with a blue cloud of smoke coming out of his tailpipe while you've got to go to the nth degree.
	And that's what's happening here. They want to tell us this is global warming with Paris Climate Accord and you're going to let China and India?
	Build as many of the dirtiest, cheapest power plants that they want?
	We know exactly what this is.
	And even the people who believe this nonsense said, you're just transferring manufacturing to China and India.
	You're not doing anything about global warming.
	And they're right. They're right.
	If it were real, they're not doing anything about it.
	This is not a grid problem.
	This is not a CO2 problem.
	This is a MacGuffin problem.
	They are manipulating us to their one solution, as Andrew Bridgen said.
	So, I'll just read a couple of comments here.
	I want to talk about the pipeline that got canceled that Sheriff Mack was talking about.
	Narrowway Narrogate Ministry says, new Dodge truck, $1,500, sitting on the lot, now over $103,000.
	Ford and Chevy are right behind them.
	They've lost their minds. They have.
	You know, that's the interesting thing.
	You can get at a car auction.
	You can get a car that's 10, 15 years old for a couple of thousand dollars, even less now at the auctions.
	There's a lot of people who are just not bidding, even on really cheap cars.
	And these are cars that, you know, they've got a few minor defects on them, but they're sound.
	They even warranty the engine and transmission on it.
	But, you know, we're talking about picking up cars at $2,000 or less.
	And what you're seeing now is a lot of these cars are going unsold because demand for cars is just collapsing.
	So Trump Burger Forever says, yes, it's crazy.
	Looked at a new Jeep the other day.
	They want $70,000 for a Jeep.
	Yeah, by the way, that's the most expensive thing at the auctions is Jeeps.
	Jeeps have really, not $70,000, but, you know, you're going to look at like $9,000 or $10,000 to get a Jeep.
	It's amazing. You know, the Wrangler type of things.
	The other ones that are more like an SUV, they're not commanding much in terms of that, but the Jeeps are still really expensive.
	If you look at them unused, they're real expensive for a used car.
	And I say real expensive because we're talking about something that's 10-15 years old, and a lot of times the Wranglers don't have a lot of miles on it, but they might be pretty tough miles that they've had.
	But the internal combustion engines just last.
	That's the point.
	You can keep fixing these things.
	They're going to ban them one way or the other if we don't stop them.
	And this is a good first move.
	I'm glad that at least they're talking about the issue.
	You probably won't see this pop up in any of the debate questions from Fox News, but at least they're talking about that issue.
	Christian Constitutional Conservative says, at this rate, we won't be able to afford a skateboard.
	Yeah.
	Well, you won't be able to afford food, so you'll be so famished that you won't be able to do that.
	Michael DeSilvio says, diesel engines are very simplistic.
	Yeah. And they make them very complicated for this other stuff.
	But again, you know, if you have a diesel, you can find different ways to power it.
	That's the other way they're going to cut these things off.
	They're cutting off our fuel.
	Just like gun control.
	Cut off the ammunition.
	And then we got nothing but clubs, you know.
	So, Navigator.
	And this is really, really crazy.
	This is the most absurd, well, not the most absurd.
	This was the most absurd thing that I had seen before the new idea of cutting down trees and burying them in the ground.
	Again, they're switching this just like they did at the beginning of the very first Earth Day, 1970.
	We're going into a new ice age, and that narrative lasted for about eight years.
	And then all of a sudden, they just flipped it.
	No, it's going to be global warming, and all the polarized caps are going to melt, and all the rest of the stuff.
	And they've done the same thing with the trees.
	They began by saying, well, you know, plant a tree because, hey, that's good.
	Trees provide shade.
	They bounce off the absorbed sunlight so it doesn't get hot.
	And we know that because you can look at the big difference in temperature.
	The thing that's driving, that they use to drive this narrative, is temperature.
	And as I've said many times, you know, going from the big city of Raleigh Out into the woods where we lived, we'd always see a four-degree temperature differential because of trees.
	And where they put the thermometer, right?
	They put the thermometer on airport, tarmacs and so forth.
	But the most ridiculous one of these things that I've seen is this idea that they were going to have a 1,300-mile CO2 pipeline.
	CO2 is natural.
	CO2 is necessary.
	CO2 is taken in by plants, and they grow better with more CO2. And so it is a feedback system that God has designed.
	You got excess CO2? Well, you're going to have more plants, and they're going to grow faster.
	And so this company, by the name of Navigator...
	Has now, abruptly on Friday, canceled the plans for this 1,300-mile pipeline.
	And Sheriff Mack, who I talked to on Thursday, the day before this got canceled, was talking about how he and other constitutional sheriffs were out there saying, we're going to stand with these people and we're not going to let this eminent domain thing happen.
	This is eminent domain being done by a corporation, given the powers to condemn, given the power to go on to somebody's property and just start surveying it.
	It's like, you're trespassing on my property.
	Get off. Oh, no, you can't throw me off.
	And so Sheriff Mack and some other sheriffs are saying, no, we're not going to let that happen.
	I don't care if they've got an order from a judge.
	That's somebody's private property.
	If they say you can't trespass on it, you can't overturn that.
	The judge doesn't have the authority to overturn that.
	And, you know, years ago we saw in Miss Kello versus New London, I think, Connecticut, and it was a situation where the city was condemning property because they wanted to essentially turn that property over to a private company that was going to build something there, and they preferred to have that private company rather than whoever it was that owned the property.
	So maybe they're going to put up Some kind of big retail thing or something, or maybe even manufacturing.
	And they said, well, we can make more tax revenue than we can from you with your house or with your small business.
	So we're going to give it to these other people.
	And we've seen the same type of thing happening after that with, for example, Costco in California.
	Remember a case in California?
	Costco came in and said, we want to build this big Costco shopping center here.
	And there was a church there.
	And so California said, all right, yeah, we'll condemn the church and give it to you so that you can build something that we can tag.
	We're not getting any tax revenue off the church, so we can get a lot of tax revenue from Costco.
	That was bad enough.
	But then with the Keystone Pipeline, we saw the eminent domain condemnation powers given to a corporation that was going to build a pipeline for oil.
	And they...
	Gave it to a foreign corporation.
	TransCanada was going to be running that pipeline.
	And they were going to be able to go in and take the property of farmers who'd had this for 150 years or so in many different areas.
	And so, you know, I look at that and it's like, well...
	We need to have oil for energy, and I support that, and I support a pipeline as being the most efficient way and safest way to transport that oil.
	But I can't agree with this condemnation.
	They need to go around it.
	Why can't we do that?
	And then you have this thing, this Midwestern CO2 pipeline.
	There's no reason...
	For a CO2 pipeline.
	None whatsoever.
	And so this has all of the insanity of a private corporation being able to go in and take people's property for something that has no reason to exist.
	This is a complete MacGuffin fantasy.
	And so on Friday they said they gave up.
	They said they canceled their plans for a 1300 mile pipeline across five Midwestern states that would have gathered carbon dioxide emissions from ethanol plants and then buried the gas deep underground.
	Jason Barker says, David, that company wanting to build that CO2 pipeline is also in the ethanol business.
	Yeah. They want to sell you the fuel and then charge you to get rid of the tractor farts.
	That's absolutely right.
	I mean, take ethanol, which is a boondoggle, and even the environmentalists don't like it.
	And, you know, you should be using that farmland to grow food.
	Instead, they're using it to grow ethanol.
	They're pushing for the ethanol to be in everything.
	I remember one of these, one year I went to...
	This convention that they have once a year, and they have think tanks.
	And they had think tanks, conservative think tanks, from all across the country.
	There was at least one from every state.
	And in some cases, it was many of them.
	You know, the type of thing where you would see Heritage Foundation and Cato Institute and stuff like that.
	But there's a lot of smaller ones.
	And they had a party, and the theme was...
	Theme was alcohol prohibition and speakeasy.
	And I didn't go, but they said, if you want to go, just knock on the door.
	And when we open up the little thing for the speakeasy, get in, just say, I'm here for the ethanol subsidy.
	We need to prohibit that kind of alcohol, I think, or at least stop subsidizing it and pushing it on people.
	And that's it.
	You know, you start out with the ethanol garbage, as Jason Barker pointed out, and then, no, we've got to do something to make this carbon neutral.
	And so they come up with this absurd thing that they're going to take the carbon dioxide from the ethanol plants, they're going to pipe it 1,300 miles, and then bury it underground.
	What a fool's errand.
	And again, it's as ridiculous as cutting the trees down and burying them underground when they can absorb carbon dioxide.
	But it's all about making money.
	They've got to have an excuse to do this stuff.
	Opposed by many landowners and environmental groups who question their safety and their effectiveness in reducing climate warming gases.
	We should always question this MacGuffin, but Fox News doesn't.
	Listen to the way that Fox News reports this.
	Navigator's pipeline would have carried planet-warming CO2 emissions.
	No, Fox News.
	They're not warming the planet.
	Give me a break.
	And this is one of the reasons why. You're not going to see any of these Republicans asked about climate change, just like you're not going to have a debate about On Fox News and with the Republicans about the vaccines, about the pharmaceutical stuff.
	They're not going to debate any of that stuff.
	So the pipeline would have carried planet-warming CO2 emissions, according to Fox, for more than 20 plants across Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, South Dakota, for permanent storage deep underground in Illinois.
	Give me a break.
	Give me a break.
	Iowa Renewable Fuels Association Executive Director said carbon capture projects are, quote, the best way to align ethanol production with the increasing demand for low-carbon fuels, both at home and abroad.
	The association said they saw the Navigator Pipeline as an opportunity to open up markets for sustainable aviation fuel for ethanol producers.
	So we've got to have a whole new market.
	We're going to, you know, have airplanes using ethanol.
	Oh, so...
	It's about the money. It's all one big grift.
	The federal tax incentives and billions of dollars from Congress, they say, would require bigger investments, less expensive alternatives, such as solar and wind.
	So these are the other people, the solar wind people, pushing against this.
	You've got one group of grifters pushing against another group of grifters.
	And they've all got this at the heart of it all.
	Is this MacGuffin, which Fox News is pushing to you.
	Everyone said we have no chance against foreign-backed, multi-billion-dollar hazardous pipelines, but when hundreds of landowners band together with a unified legal strategy, we can win.
	I don't know what's hazardous about a CO2 pipeline.
	Crazy. Anyway, five and a half billion dollars was what it was going to be.
	The system... Would have carried CO2 emissions from more than another one.
	North Dakota, South Dakota, and Summit Carbon Solutions have proposed a 2,000-mile interstate pipeline network that would carry it from 30 ethanol plants to be buried deep underground in central North Dakota.
	Instead of Illinois, North Dakota.
	Instead of 20, 30.
	Instead of 1,300 miles, 2,000 miles.
	You talk about malinvestment.
	You talk about central planning.
	I mean, we need to be building functional infrastructure.
	Instead, we're playing these kinds of ludicrous, quixotic games, playing with windmills and all the rest of the stuff.
	Look, wind power and solar power is fine for you getting off of the grid.
	It doesn't work for the grid.
	And this is absolutely ludicrous.
	It's like the masks on our faces or the pronouns on our tongues.
	This is what this is really about.
	So again, canceled in a blow to Biden's climate plans.
	He was all in on that as well because it's all about rewarding his buddies.
	Why are scientists so slow to abandon their failed climate models?
	Ask Daily Skeptic.
	Well, I can summarize all of it.
	I can tell you without reading this article to you.
	It's really about money, right?
	Because this is how the people get rewarded on these grants.
	They're not going to change their models.
	They still haven't changed the models that they lied to us about COVID with.
	And when we look at all the hypocrisy of this, Harry and Meghan, you know, Harry, the man formerly known as Prince, Took a private jet for a Caribbean holiday after their climate conference, after they had done so much good.
	They treated themselves to a private jet trip.
	The Duke and Duchess of Suckup departed on a private jet to enjoy some Caribbean solitude after attending a conference that claimed climate change is damaging children's mental health.
	Well, that's the only thing true about this.
	Their climate change fear porn and narrative really is scaring kids, and it really is damaging their mental health.
	It's their climate fear from them.
	The Daily Mirror reported that they attended the summit in New York on October the 10th and then flew from New Jersey to a remote and exclusive island off the coast of St.
	Vincent and the Grenadines, known for attracting Hollywood stars.
	Desirous of secluded escape.
	An extremely high net worth tourist.
	It is jokingly referred to as an enclave where, quote, billionaires go to escape millionaires.
	That's where the man formerly known as Prince went.
	You and I, what are we going to get out of all this stuff?
	Well, according to the cities, the C40 organization, you and I will get one trip, be allowed, one trip every three years.
	Of less than a thousand miles.
	Meanwhile, they can take their private jet.
	That's one trip, not on a private jet.
	That's one trip on a commercial carrier where they have gone to great lengths to try to make travel as miserable as possible.
	You and I will get one trip every three years of less than a thousand miles.
	They go to the island where billionaires go to to escape millionaires.
	Big Brit is back again.
	Says trucks used to be a cheap form of transport for the working class.
	Now you have to be rich. Yeah.
	Yeah. Instead of getting a very simple pickup truck?
	No. No. Got an electric truck.
	$103,000. High boost.
	Wrong, David. Ethanol is king.
	I've been running E since it came out.
	It is a great fuel.
	Great for HHP. What does that mean?
	HHP? I'm not sure.
	But, yeah, it is...
	We'll talk about that coming up.
	One guy who's had to escape to a remote area because of the COVID stuff.
	He's talking about how he's doing his own biofuel.
	Yeah, if you've got a diesel, fine.
	And says we should be using more alcohol-run based cars.
	How 9,000 Watson.
	I'm going to make my own ethanol.
	And... Big Brit is back again, says petroleum gas is a fairly cheap alternative.
	Narrowway Narrowgate Ministries.
	Ethanol is made from corn to help subsidize the farmers who, because of a trade imbalance, couldn't sell their corn on the markets.
	It's an artificial way to prop up the farmers for a season.
	Exactly right. All politics.
	All politics. All based around rewarding their backers.
	Jason Barker says ethanol is very bad for our current engines.
	They're not designed for it.
	That's why they only put a small amount in the fuel supply for the seasonal blends.
	It's also worse on the fuel economy.
	Thank you for the tip. He says, for the gas tank, I promise there is no ethanol in the tip.
	Well, thank you, Jason. I appreciate that very much.
	And so we're going to take a quick break.
	He says, I'll bet that Harry had a nice fat stake on that private jet flight.
	Oh, you better believe it.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	I want to talk about the pandemic.
	As the pandemic MacGuffin, we've had some big news in terms of liability for these criminals.
	Get them in their wallet.
	That's what I said. That's one way to shut these things down.
	One final comment here about the energy stuff.
	Nathan Bedford Forrest, 1865.
	It says ethanol is a net loss, and for horsepower, it has to have less energy and power per gallon than gasoline.
	Well, I think one thing we can all agree on is that we all ought to have the freedom to run whatever we want.
	And, you know, we ought to be able to pick the car we want.
	We ought to be able to pick the fuel we want.
	I'm not interested in shutting down anybody's choices on any of this stuff.
	And I think we also agree that the government ought to stay out of this picking the winners and losers and subsidizing one thing or the other because it is simply corruption.
	Chrony capitalism is too nice a phrase for it.
	It's simply corruption. That's all it is.
	He says if ethanol was not subsidized, the cost per gallon would be much higher than gasoline.
	I agree. Let's take a look at...
	This is... An outrageous article from the Washington Post.
	I know, I know, they do it all the time.
	But the pandemic is over in this Michigan County, but the mistrust never ended.
	And I thought, well, that's a good thing, isn't it?
	I looked at this, and my take on it, of course, is completely different than the Washington Post.
	The Washington Post starts with a tale of a pregnant woman who works for the county health department.
	She is 31 years old, six months pregnant.
	She's worried about how long she's going to have a job.
	And what is her job?
	Well, she says she is, her van, as they talk about her work, she's thinking about it.
	You know, this is the way they always write.
	This is NPR's approach, Washington Post's approach about it.
	You're supposed to understand the policies and everything because of the plight of one individual person.
	No, that's just the way they manipulate you.
	This is a narrative to manipulate you.
	Her van sped by cornfields, you know, where they would be growing ethanol, I guess.
	And a Cambodian Buddhist temple and a few Trump flags fluttering in the early fall breeze.
	Eight of the 11 commissioners on the county board would decide her fate, whether or not her job was going to be eliminated.
	The new commissioners, all Republicans, had been trying since January to fire the head of the health department and replace her with a safety manager from a local HVAC company who had risen to prominence as a critic of mask mandates.
	They had blocked the county government from accepting grants that mentioned the goals of the CDC and the WHO. And they had passed a measure questioning the safety of the vaccine.
	Sounds like these people know what's going on.
	Sounds like these people don't trust the public health dictators.
	We're supposed to feel sorry for this woman who's going to lose her public health job as a bureaucrat, dictating to other people under color of law whether they have to put a cloth on their face or not, or whether they have to take a vaccine, or whether they have to shut their business down, lose their job, lose their business.
	There's no concern from the Washington Post about that.
	No concern about what these absurd rules did to our economy.
	Now, these evil Republicans want to return the health department's budget to pre-pandemic levels, which they hoped would help return their county to a moment before the coronavirus disrupted their lives.
	No, the coronavirus did not disrupt our lives.
	Trump and Fauci did.
	Trump and Fauci. And you liars at the Washington Post.
	You're the ones who disrupted our lives.
	The coronavirus didn't do anything.
	It's your vaccine and the rest of this stuff that did it.
	So on the one side, we've got these horrible, angry Republicans who realize what a sham this was and what they did to people and say, we're not going to put up with this anymore.
	And we had this poor, pregnant bureaucrat So, COVID killed more than a million Americans, says Washington Post.
	No, it didn't. That's a lie.
	That's a lie. Even though deaths caused by the virus have declined dramatically.
	No, no.
	We actually had, with the vaccines, a tremendous increase in excess deaths.
	So, Washington Post is lying to you again.
	Mistrust, even though all this has happened, even though these people did stellar work, With all their superstitious cloth masks and everything, the mistrust and the disinformation that grew out of the government's response were still radiating throughout the nation's politics at all levels.
	Not enough.
	There needs to be more of this.
	A lot more.
	We need to not forget what these people did, and we need not to forgive these bureaucracies.
	They need to be given the death penalty.
	Get rid of these bureaucracies.
	They're corrupt. They're fraudulent.
	They're liars. They're thieves.
	Get rid of these institutions.
	In Ottawa County, a fast-growing middle-class community of about 300,000 people on Lake Michigan's shore, the battles over the mask mandates and whether to get vaccinated had divided families and torn apart church congregations.
	Well, there was really no reason for it, except for the pig-headed people who demanded that everybody else do what they say.
	Except for the pig-headed people who decided they were going to play Simon Says with everybody else.
	Well, here's a Simon who says something here.
	This is, and again, we're talking about, you know, doing your own fuel.
	Here's a Simon who got banned because of what he had to say.
	Dr. Simon got it.
	He said he's got a substack.
	He says, I'm Simon, and instead of being a researcher at a world-class university, now I live in the Brazilian jungle.
	This is the story of how I ended up here.
	And he says, you know, hey, I had a lot of people ask me about this.
	He said, it turned into a very long post.
	But he said, I thought you might be interested.
	But he said, beginning in 2021, I spoke out against the rigged peer review process of the COVID PCR protocol paper.
	As a result, I lost my job at WUR, faced other reprisals, such as the freezing of my bank account, and I had the police on my doorstep.
	Since I was also unvaccinated and still am, my life in the Netherlands was unbearable, and I just wanted and needed to get away.
	My options at that time were very limited as medical tyranny.
	That's what we're talking about here. Medical tyranny.
	So I said and was attacked by these shills, Anti-Defamation League and Southern Poverty Law Center.
	If you say that it was medical martial law, that makes you anti-Semitic according to those people.
	I'm so sick of them.
	They have absolutely no credibility to talk about anything that is happening now anywhere.
	But anyway, medical tyranny, medical martial law is what I always called it.
	Had taken the whole world hostage.
	Since I'd already worked as a professor in Brazil in the previous years, and Bolsonaro was critical, both the pandemic and the vaccination, my choice quickly fell on Brazil.
	To escape the crazed civilization, I bought a few hectares of jungle land at 1500-meter-high mountain.
	Only 4x4 cars can even get up there.
	Here, he says. It's 30 minutes by car to the nearest little village.
	That's one of the reasons why, you know, the Jeep Wranglers are going at a premium.
	He's next to me to be able to get to his property without one of those, anyway.
	After reviving my Adobe Illustrator and QR code generation skills, I prepared required documents.
	Is he saying that he rigged those things?
	Good for him if he did.
	And I escaped mid-2021 from crazy Netherlands.
	And so he says, meanwhile, he says, I live here completely self-sustainably.
	I constructed two greenhouses in which I grow tomatoes, strawberries, passion fruits, and all kinds of vegetables.
	I built a recirculating aquaculture system in which I grow trout.
	I installed solar panels and a 50 amp hour battery system, providing me with electricity 24-7.
	My mountain property has several water sources.
	I'm using a ram pump, which does not require electricity, to pump the water above my house.
	And then he uses gravity feed.
	Heat up the water using solar collectors and a stove that includes a heat exchanger.
	As a matter of fact, if you scroll down there, you can see a picture of what it looks like.
	Yeah, yeah. There's this greenhouse.
	There's his house there. He's got a solar collector there.
	I don't think that's photovoltaic.
	I think that's just pumping the water through it to heat it.
	And a stove that includes a heat exchanger.
	I have plenty of Rhode Island red chickens providing me with eggs and chicken nuggets.
	And there are many boars on my land that are delicious.
	To be honest, life here is a bit lonely.
	Far from home and from my Western culture, but on the other hand, Starlink lets me connect to you guys, which is equally important, and I'm well prepared for the moment when the excrement hits the fan.
	Luckily, I'm currently still allowed to travel until they implement carbon credit policies.
	By the way, my car runs on ethanol.
	There we go. And I have sufficient biomass here to make my own fuel.
	So Klaus Schwab can kiss my behind.
	That's what I'm saying. You know, all these technologies have an appropriate use.
	I absolutely hate the use of solar and wind for the grid.
	But it's great to get off of the grid.
	So anyways, that's it.
	He says, if you made it up until here...
	Let's make this post a marketplace of ideas.
	So what do you have to suggest to resist the great reset?
	So again, that's on his sub-stack.
	I'm sorry, it's on Twitter thread.
	So good for him. He has thrived with that.
	But let's talk about the people who have died.
	We just had another fitness influencer out of New Zealand.
	Show the picture of her.
	She is very fit.
	44 years old, Rochelle Chase died suddenly.
	Died suddenly. And again, we're seeing this so often with young athletes.
	Why? Because they're used to pushing their heart very hard, and they don't realize that they've got heart damage.
	She died at 44 years of age.
	And so...
	I've already played one clip about Andrew Bridgen talking about the fact, you know, we need to be careful with these car bans because whenever the government is pushing one single solution, we should be suspicious of that.
	And as I said, he's been trying to get a debate in Parliament about excess death rates.
	Nobody wants to talk about it.
	And so finally, they gave him an opportunity to speak to an empty parliament.
	This is the news coverage, a sympathetic news coverage of what he had to say.
	Before we continue, a quick word on Andrew Bridgen, MP. You can agree or disagree with his comments about the COVID-19 vaccine, but it's absolutely right to debate the ongoing issue of excess deaths in this country and in other parts of the world.
	After much pushback, he finally made it happen today in the House of Commons.
	Sadly, the chamber was almost empty with just a handful of MPs present, including GB News star Philip Davies.
	In the speech, he pointed out a particularly devastating statistic, that we've experienced more excess deaths since July 2021 than in the whole of 2020.
	And that was the height of the pandemic.
	Given the total preoccupation with the COVID death toll during the pandemic, daily updates no less, when more people are dying than should be in this country across various age groups, why aren't we talking about it?
	Earlier in the year, excess deaths were approaching pandemic levels.
	And according to the British Medical Journal, are currently 5% higher across 2023 than they were in 2019 before COVID struck.
	5% higher this year alone.
	More young people are dying than should be, as well as a worrying spike among 50 to 64-year-olds.
	What a sick joke, therefore, that Parliament should be all but empty for this important issue.
	The same Parliament that signed off lockdowns and other debatable measures for which we are now paying a huge economic and societal price.
	A broken economy, a mental health tsunami, a generation of damaged kids and an NHS waiting list of 7.6 million people.
	Parliament was full when legislating that madness.
	Now it's empty. You could hear a pin drop.
	Excess deaths.
	Why the deafening silence?
	Exactly right. And that's GBN, Great Britain News.
	It is outrageous that they don't want to have a debate.
	It's outrageous that nobody cares about this.
	And that's the legislatures in every country.
	Not just in the UK, it's in the US as well.
	Crickets about that. Only thing they want to talk about is, well, let's talk about the lab thing.
	Because that way they can keep the fear of the so-called virus, the so-called pandemic going.
	And you see that not just in the mainstream media, but you also see it in the alternative media as well.
	Rebecca Barnett, on her substack, talked about the way the BBC covered this instead of GB News.
	She said, when dealing with inconvenient information that contradicts the power structure's preferred narrative, legacy media functions as a propaganda arm, and they have two options.
	They can completely do a media blackout and not report it at all, or they can delegitimize it through framing techniques.
	On Friday, Andrew Bridget, MP, Member of Parliament, delivered a speech to the UK Parliament on the subject of the UK's sustained period of excess deaths, over which half of which, he said, cannot be attributed to COVID.
	And he brought the receipts.
	He brought the documents. He said, everything that I say here.
	It was like a 30-minute speech.
	He said, everything that I say here, I've got receipts for it.
	And, you know, I'm not going to go into the details of this because we have talked about it.
	Over and over again. But what is interesting is to see the way the government does both the completely ignoring it and then if they can't ignore it, and the BBC could not ignore it because they were compelled essentially to cover it.
	It's kind of like C-SPAN here in the United States where they cover the parliamentary stuff there in the UK. After more than 20 attempts to bring this topic together, To a parliamentary debate, Bridgen was finally granted 30 minutes to discuss excess deaths.
	He addressed a chamber that was all but empty of the 650 MPs who serve in the House of Commons.
	He began by saying, we have experienced more excess deaths since July 2021.
	What was that? Well, that was when the jabs rolled out.
	Then, in the whole of 2020, when we supposedly had this worldwide pandemic that was going to be as bad or worse than what happened in 1918, unlike during the pandemic, however, those deaths were not disproportionately of the old.
	In other words, the excess deaths are striking down people in the prime of life, but no one seems to care.
	Well, I care, he said.
	A lone voice out of 650 members.
	The only one who cares what's going on.
	And let me show you what this looked like with the BBC. In his speech, Bridgen gave a thorough rundown of the UK's mortality situation, including flaws in the official data, lethal COVID care pathways and safety concerns with the jabs, such as the recent revelation that the mRNA shots are contaminated with plasmid DNA at levels above regulatory issues.
	And so how did the BBC report this?
	As they point out, you know, most of the media just completely ignored it.
	All other members of Parliament completely ignored it.
	But in keeping with their role as partners of the government and stakeholders in the narrative control, the legacy media have maintained a media blackout.
	But instead, the BBC went for the second option, which is to push back against all of this stuff.
	And to wave it away, just like Washington Post waved away any concerns about what the public health missteps and everything that they got wrong, how they contradicted themselves, how they used extraordinary measures that have never been done before, things that defied common sense, things that defied science, and they continue to do it.
	No, Washington Post just waves that away.
	Well, BBC did it the same way.
	Instead, the BBC adopted option number two using framing to delegitimize Andrew Bridgen's address.
	Throughout the live stream, the BBC overlaid chyrons, directly contradicting lower thirds, if you will, or undermining his statements as he was making them.
	They were debating him, silently debating him.
	And it really is disgusting.
	Here's a picture of what that looks like.
	Okay, so here, this upper picture...
	Look at how the entire place is empty.
	Now he's speaking and there's three or four other people in there.
	And then their caption says, the NHS, rather, the National Health System, says, COVID-19 vaccines used in the UK are safe and the best protection from getting seriously ill with the disease.
	That's a contradiction of what he's saying.
	And another one, as he's speaking, they zoom in on him and they say they put up.
	Most people with allergies, including food or penicillin allergies, can be vaccinated against COVID-19.
	And on and on.
	Yeah, scroll down a little bit more.
	Get the one below it there. Diseases like measles and diphtheria have been reduced by up to 99.9% since vaccines were induced.
	This is the BBC. I mean, they're doing commercials.
	They're doing like Ask Your Doctor commercial type of nonsense, right?
	On Chiron's, as he's talking, again, he spoke, he was allowed to speak for 30 minutes because nobody wanted to debate him.
	And because the BBC had to carry it, they did this dishonest debating.
	And I say dishonest because, A, he doesn't know that this is up there.
	And he doesn't get a chance to respond, right?
	To what they had to say.
	There weren't any other members of parliament who wanted to debate him.
	And the BBC is not debating him.
	They're contradicting him when he doesn't even know it.
	They go on. NHS vaccines do not overload or weaken the immune system, including vaccines used for children.
	Absolute lie.
	Absolute lie. And so, as they point out here, you know, official NHS guidance states that government-administered vaccines are safe and often essential for public health.
	That's the kind of garbage that the BBC was putting up.
	Rebecca says, framing as a propaganda tool is used to instruct the audience what to think about information being presented, rather than to parse the claims being made to determine their accuracy.
	Inconvenient claims are waived off as baseless or false, just as we saw with the Washington Post.
	And you don't get any explanation.
	Instead, you have logical fallacies such as an appeal to authority.
	The NHS says, and you saw that over and over again, but the NHS says this.
	this the nhs says well the nhs was telling you everything wrong and so is fauci cdc um i am told said she said i'm told by an anonymous londoner that it is highly unusual for the bbc to use chyrons lower thirds to essentially suggest that a speaker is lying during a live streaming of a parliamentary debate which is exactly what they were doing
	this is a live stream of a debate and the bbc is debating him behind his back and accusing him of being a liar and he doesn't even know that they're doing that you Usually, BBC chyrons will summarize what the speaker is saying.
	For example... Starmer raises corporate taxes in heated clash with the business secretary.
	However, this Londoner tells me they would never, never run a Chiron.
	For example, the Chancellor is talking about how tax revenues have dropped since the tax increase.
	And then you would have the BBC would never put a Chiron saying, forecasts indicate that tax revenues are rising.
	In other words, refuting his claim live.
	According to the BBC's framing of Bridgen's speech in the UK Parliament, it could be described as, summarize it up, it's a rogue kook MP presents scientific information in Parliament that we know is false because the NHS says so.
	That's basically what they did.
	They said this top-down model of arguments from authority is antithetical to classical liberal democratic model But it's also antithetical.
	She doesn't say this, but it's also antithetical to science and to the scientific method.
	Arguments from authority are completely antithetical, as Francis Bacon said.
	He called it academia.
	He said, no, we're going to have a scientific method where people's assertions are tested, and they've got to prove it.
	And we take measurements, and we do all that, and we show our data, and we debate the data, and what does it mean?
	There are consistent signs in the way that legacy media are behaving in the UK that despite all the trappings of democracy, like, oh, look, he's standing in Parliament, right?
	But it's not a debate.
	And, you know, they are attacking him as he's saying it.
	It's exercised in a way that closely aligns with an authoritarian structure.
	That's exactly what this is.
	They don't want their narrative challenged.
	Well, they're going to get it challenged.
	Again, as he was saying, and if you want a full transcript of what he had to say, you can see the clip on Twitter as well.
	A half hour. Daily Skeptic put up a full transcript of the debate.
	And so you can find it there.
	But some of the things he said, he said, there's going to be a full press pack that is going out to all media outlets following my speech.
	It'll have all the evidence to back up the claims that I will make.
	But they're not going to look at that. Instead, what they'll do is they'll say, but NHS says this, and so we don't even have to look at your data.
	He said, to understand whether there's excess by definition, we need to estimate how many deaths would have been expected.
	The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the OECD, uses 2015 to 2019 as a baseline.
	And the Government's Office for Health Improvement and Disparities uses 2015 to 2019 baseline modeled to allow for aging.
	We all know the population is aging, the baby boomers and so forth.
	They adjust for all of that.
	He said there was already nearly two extra deaths a day in the second half of 2021 among 15 to 19-year-old males, but potentially even more if those referred to the coroner were fully included.
	The ONS refused in court to give anonymized detail about those deaths.
	It admitted that the data it was withholding were statistically significant, and it said the ONS recognizes that more work could be undertaken.
	To examine the mortality rates of young people in 2021, and it intends to do so once more reliable data are available.
	They did this two years ago.
	Didn't seem to be able to figure out how to get that data together to show it.
	We had models that were cooked up by Ferguson at the Imperial College of London.
	It didn't take him any time at all to do that.
	It was total garbage, but they ran with it as if it was absolute truth.
	How many more extra deaths than 15 to 19-year-olds will it take to trigger such work, he says, says Andrew Bridgen.
	Surely they would be desperately keen to investigate deaths in young men.
	Why else do we have an independent body charged with examining mortality data?
	Surely the ONS has a responsibility to collect data from coroners to produce timely information.
	Again, this is two years ago.
	More than two years ago. And then he says, even for the over 85-year-olds, there were 8,000 excess deaths, 4% above the expected levels for the 12 months starting in July 2020.
	Those 8,000 deaths are laid at the feet of Boris Johnson, laid at the feet of people like Matt Hancock, who didn't believe this stuff.
	We saw the text messages where he's mocking the people about the things that he was going to do to them as he then cheated on On both his own rules and on the husband or the wife that he was having an adulterous relationship with.
	And he's not the only one.
	Multiple ones. These deaths, these excess deaths are laid at the feet of people like Trump and Fauci.
	And all the Congress members who don't care in the United States.
	We don't have one Congressional member who fights this as hard as Andrew Bridgen in the UK. Not a single one.
	They will be held responsible for this.
	If not in this life, God will hold them responsible for this.
	He said there are just over 14,000 excess deaths in the under 65-year-olds before vaccination from April 2020 to the end of March 2021.
	However, since that time, there's been more than 21,000 excess deaths, 50% more.
	But let's understand.
	The excess deaths that happened in 2020 were not due to COVID. They were due to the hospital death protocol.
	I've been saying that from the very beginning.
	I used to have arguments with people on social media.
	So there's no excess deaths from COVID. Oh, yes, there are.
	It's like, no, it's from the hospital death protocol.
	I was arguing that about 2020.
	And then even more so in 2021.
	So what do we find out? Well, inadvertently, the ONS, which is the Office for National Statistics, which doesn't want to collect and show these statistics after even more than two years, they inadvertently showed what is happening to the kids.
	Bottom line, the expose.
	It says that deaths of children are up to 52 times, not 52% more, 52 times more likely to die following COVID vaccination than unvaccinated kids.
	And the UK government is trying to hide it.
	So its Office for National Statistics, ONS, published details on this.
	And they initially thought they'd gotten this covered up.
	But actually, you can uncover it with some of the other data that they put up, and it is 52 times the rate.
	Let me just respond to some of the people who have left comments here.
	General McGuffin, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that. Thank you. It says, thank you, David, and family for all it.
	Well, thank you. Hopefully, I'll still be able to get the David Knight Show and Liberty Conspiracy while huddled in my makeshift nuclear bunker in the coming months.
	Yeah, we'll see.
	We're kind of nestled here between some mountains here, but Oak Ridge Labs is a prime target because of their work on special nuclear devices here.
	And Handy says the COVID jab is now included on the childhood vaccine schedule.
	What a crime that is.
	What a crime. Brad Scott, homeschool your kids or they'll be murdered with mRNA vax.
	What a choice. Yes, as a matter of fact.
	I want to take a real quick break and want to come back.
	We've got about another 10 minutes or so.
	I want to talk about what is going on with homeschooling and what is going on with the regular schooling.
	We'll be right back. Using free speech to free minds.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	Boost says, we'll never see one ounce of justice for COVID shots, but God knows.
	Yes. Vengeance is mine, says the Lord.
	Handy said, four of our employees died unexpectedly in Atlanta alone.
	It's just staggering. The deaths are staggering, and their ability to cover it up is truly staggering to me.
	But not surprising.
	When I look at these reports about Jon Stewart's kicked out of the Apple thing, and they're saying they think his ratings have been really low, but they think that it's because of what he said about artificial intelligence in China.
	They've got their things that you can't talk about.
	I said, you know, 2020 was the year that the world became China, but that was enough to get me kicked off of YouTube.
	Got a strike for that.
	But let's talk about what is happening with the schools.
	Over 500 students didn't go to school the day after four masked students ran wild, pushing and shoving and hitting, punching students.
	This is the level of anarchy.
	And total defenselessness in these schools.
	Understand the risk that your children are at physically.
	Yeah, we can talk about the mRNA vaccines.
	We can talk about the gender grooming and all this stuff, you know, the gaslighting of gender stuff.
	But even just physical stuff like this.
	Over 500 high school students absent from Washington State High School on Tuesday, staying away after a small squad of masked individuals caused havoc.
	532 students absent.
	We had an incident on Monday that's been widely publicized and contributed to the number of students absent at that school.
	People talking about it.
	One person said, my daughter is just scared.
	On the other side of it, she wants to go to school because she feels like her grades are dropping with me keeping her out.
	But as a parent, what do you do?
	Keep them out. Keep them out.
	They're not even physically safe there.
	I mean, they didn't shoot them, but they could have shot them.
	Five masked people, I said four, five masked people, approached the side door, entered into the classroom.
	Intruders ran through the hall, then pushing and punching students and one another.
	Chaos broke out.
	She said everybody started running.
	They said people came in and were masked and were pushing people out of the way.
	School administrators quickly jumped into action, chasing the individuals from the school grounds.
	Local high school went into a secure and teach lockdown.
	Again, lockdown.
	They've been practicing lockdown for a long time, doing it to the kids.
	That's how they train us for tyranny.
	That's how they train us for chaos and anarchy in the schools.
	That's what they're training the next generation for.
	You think they're teaching them to...
	Giving them knowledge?
	No. Teaching them to think critically?
	No. Preparing them for a job?
	No. They're preparing them to live in a totalitarian society.
	One's body is private.
	And an American state makes a common sense gender ruling.
	You know, it's kind of interesting. You look at these abortion liars.
	What have they said for the longest time?
	Well, we've got a right to privacy. Well, not if you're a girl.
	You don't have any privacy in the shower or in the dressing room or anything like that?
	My body, my choice?
	What about the mask?
	What about the jabs? That really was your body.
	No, it's pretty thin, these lies that they keep telling people.
	Founder of Liberty Council is praising a court ruling in the state of Idaho that has upheld the state law that requires public schools to provide separate locker rooms and showers for boys and girls.
	Common sense. The Idaho state law got overwhelming support from state lawmakers, also gives students the right to sue their school if they encounter a person of the opposite sex while using a facility designated for their biological sex.
	They need to be able to sue the administrators personally, not the school.
	The taxpayers will pay that bill.
	There will be no cost to the administrators.
	They said the issue is whether or not a student must, against his or her wishes, be forced to change in the presence of someone of the opposite sex.
	Why are we even talking about this?
	And they said it's even more pressing when you're talking about kids of school age because they're more vulnerable in all of this stuff.
	It's absolutely insane.
	And so then you have John Oliver who jumps into all of this to attack homeschooling.
	John Oliver, this is a thread by Wayne Burkett, Wanya Burkett, I guess is the way you say it.
	John Oliver, incredulously reporting that there are states where parents can homeschool their kids and they don't even have to tell the state what they're doing in their private homes.
	And the audience agreeing and nodding and applauding that it's crazy that a family could just do whatever they wanted to without checking in with the government first.
	Now he's spending a bunch of time, he says on this thread, this is a Twitter thread, he's kind of live blogging it, now he's spending a bunch of time on some Nazi homeschooling program, somebody on his staff dug up, that I'm sure like six people in Montana have ever even heard of, After priming you with a long segment about Nazi homeschooling program that no homeschooler's ever heard of, he pivots to a position that the real problem with homeschooling is that many of the programs are created by conservative evangelicals.
	And now he's expressing astonishment that parents are allowed to raise their kids however they want without a background check.
	Hey, John Oliver, go home.
	We don't care what you think.
	Just go home. Paleo Armory says Texas has religious, medical, and conscious exemption.
	My kid isn't getting any jabs.
	Good, good. Children are not social experiments, says Oklahoma, as a court has now upheld their ban on these mutilations that are there.
	And then we have a medical advocacy group has released a detransitioner bill of rights, hoping that maybe some states will put in a detransitioner bill of rights.
	What they want to do is they want to ban conversion therapy.
	And you know the reason why they call it conversion therapy is because this is really targeted towards Christians, trying to help people, trying to tell them.
	How God can free them from this type of slavery, just like can be freed from alcohol addiction or something else.
	Now, this is targeted at Christians.
	That's why they call it conversion therapy.
	Psychiatrists don't have any power to change people's lives.
	So the document cites the rights of citizens to have informed consent.
	Of course, jabs amass, but lots of personal testimony from detransitioners.
	There's a lot of lawsuits that are happening.
	As a matter of fact, there's one in North Carolina.
	And a North Carolina lesbian has slammed doctors who led her down a path of transitioning as a fractured, unstable adolescent, she said.
	She endured 18 years of sexual, physical, and psychological torment, she said.
	And then they mutilated her body.
	And so now she is suing the doctors that did this to her.
	We're seeing people even at Tavistock, which is the UK Center for Gender Ideology, I'd call it the gender religion, doing the same thing.
	And yet, how is it that this is happening to such a degree?
	Well, it really begins in our churches, doesn't it?
	And their failure. Look at this article here.
	Pastor defends an innocent man allegedly found in possession of 9900 child sex abuse images calls him a man of integrity.
	Actually, he's not innocent.
	They haven't had that determination yet.
	They've alleged that he did this.
	But the key thing is that he's a church volunteer.
	And even though they found 9900 child sex abuse images The pastor says, in his Christian walk, I believe we'd find him solid in his belief, a man of integrity, leadership skills, and virtues. No.
	We need to have churches that stand on principle.
	That's what George Varner was saying.
	He said, people who identify themselves as Christians, only about 4% of them, actually walk the walk.
	And that includes the pastors who will excuse this stuff.
	Thank you for listening.
	The Common Man.
	They created Common Core and dumbed down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.

▲