Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 20, 2023 - The David Knight Show

02:40:37

The David Knight Show - 10/20/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	I love only that which they defend.
	But the question is, what kind of war?
	Is this something we're going to fight on the battlefield?
	You know, they have chariots, they have horses, they have jets, they have nuclear weapons.
	Our weapons, however, are mighty because our God is mighty.
	We don't just fight to defend our country.
	We fight to follow God and to defend what is right.
	We don't trust our weapons.
	you You know, we have weapons, spiritual weapons, that are mighty.
	Because our God is mighty.
	Our weakness is perfected in His strength.
	And that is something that is a subtext, of course, in the Tolkien stories as well.
	The little hobbits who have nothing.
	Surrounded by all of these other beings, and we are surrounded by beings even if you don't see them.
	He's aware of that.
	But we're surrounded by all of these supernatural beings, other ordinary beings, fallen beings, all the rest of this stuff in this vast war.
	And we're these little insignificant hobbits.
	So back to the future, morphs into dystopia.
	This is from Austin Padgett at the Mises Institute.
	He said, well, here it is, 2023, eight years after 2015, the year of flying cars and climate-controlled clothing that Marty McFly traveled to in a time machine.
	But in our own world, the ruling elite wants to ban cars to control the climate.
	And he points out that the United States grew at an average of over 4% economically per year from 1860 to 1970.
	But of course, we're not allowed to have that kind of growth anymore.
	Only India and China are allowed to have that kind of growth.
	As a matter of fact, they're growing even faster than that.
	But if we get up above their magic average number since 1970s, the average GDP growth has been 2.7%.
	If we get above that, the Federal Reserve has told us that our economy will melt down.
	Something bad is going to happen to us if we have that kind of growth.
	That's dangerous. It must be stopped.
	And the Federal Reserve will stop it.
	But it's okay for China and India to grow four times as fast as our economy.
	We have to be throttled, however.
	And they've been doing that.
	And so Austin Padgett points out, if they hadn't throttled our economy to 2.7% annual growth, that it would be about 65% larger than it is today if it had grown at the same rate that it had grown the previous century.
	But in 1970, they pulled a lot of strings to make sure that wasn't going to happen.
	And they've continued to pull those strings.
	The current gross domestic product would be an additional $15 trillion.
	Or an additional, you'd be per capita, you'd be on average $45,000 richer.
	That's what the Federal Reserve has cost according to his calculation about just controlling our GDP. You know, forget about inflation and other things like that.
	The gap in unrealized potential is massive.
	And accounts for discrepancy between our past visions of the future and our current reality.
	If people knew about the future that was stolen from them, they would be outraged.
	But it's not even about that now.
	They're not content just to keep us at a slower rate of growth.
	They want to knock us back down into a pre-industrial society.
	That's what Klaus Schwab's fourth industrial revolution is about.
	It's about undoing all of the economic progress and wealth that the average person has achieved and taking it all for themselves, for the stakeholders.
	We're literally holding a stake over our hearts, these vampires.
	If people knew about the future that was stolen from them, they'd be outraged.
	The loss of potential that was never known usually cannot affect people, but there's a growing sense that something doesn't add up.
	No, it's far worse than this.
	It's far worse than what could have been.
	No meat, no dairy, no private cars.
	Only three items of clothing purchased per year.
	You will not own your home either.
	You will live in a small micro apartment in a gigantic city like Gaza or something.
	People packed in by the millions into a very small area.
	So the global elite can have free reign with the rest of the world.
	So that they can do whatever they want with their flying cars or their private jets or whatever it is.
	You will take a trip, one trip every three years, perhaps, maybe, if you're lucky.
	If you pass all of their scrutiny, you take their global ID, you get to travel once every three years, less than a thousand miles.
	They, on the other hand, will have the world as their oyster.
	So he says, so what sent us so wildly off this path set by previous achievements?
	He said, well, there is a common political narrative that the laissez-faire pushed to deregulate and cut taxes by Reagan in the 1980s resulted in the consolidation of wealth and corporate power that led to our current malaise.
	The main problem with this narrative is that there was no recent laissez-faire moment.
	As a matter of fact, if you go back to laissez-faire, you go back to before 1860.
	Regulation of public spending continued to increase through the 1980s when the government couldn't raise taxes high enough to keep up with spending.
	It just inflated the money supply.
	A strategy that became even easier when the gold standard was fully abandoned in 1971.
	I think that had something to do with this loss of standard of living as well.
	That's one of the key things, isn't it?
	Yeah. Make sure you own nothing?
	Well, first thing they want to make sure you don't own is gold.
	The number of pages of the Code of Federal Regulations has increased by a factor of 10 from the 1960s.
	From 20,000 pages to over 200,000 pages.
	Yes, it's gone up exponentially.
	And his point that he's talking about here, and I remember, you know, when I was in junior high school and high school, I used to read my dad's Business Week magazines that he'd get.
	And I remember them talking about urosclerosis.
	Urosclerosis. This is like the hardening of, you know, old and dying.
	Because of their regulations, they regulated everything.
	And they said, you know, freedom was our advantage over them.
	The longest period of low growth in history has been characterized also by the expansion of the regulatory state.
	And he says, in 1970, the top four companies in any given industry made up an average of 20% of the market share.
	Today, the top four companies in any given industry control roughly 80%.
	Your 80-20 rule.
	It's flipped. It's probably not even four companies, if you look at it.
	Probably two. Regulatory monopolies create single points from which special interests can control whole markets and enrich the wealthiest people.
	See, stakeholder capitalism and the regulatory state are two sides of the same coin.
	And it's interesting, and we have to understand the mechanism by which they enslave us.
	And this is the mechanism by which they enslave us.
	The Federal Reserve, the regulatory state, are strangling us.
	That is the mechanism.
	But it's not enough to understand the mechanism.
	We have to understand what their intentions are, what their end goal is.
	And that's clearly stated by the World Economic Forum, by the UN, and unfortunately by our globalist leaders, both Biden and Trump, have made it very clear what they want to do.
	You can call it a freedom city, but it's still a UN smart city.
	That's what Trump calls his smart city.
	You can label somebody as being anti-globalist even though they enact all of the globalist desires, even training us for global ID and training us for universal basic income.
	We better wake up.
	First of all, if you're going to fight a war, you better understand who's on your side and who isn't.
	Who's going to stab you in the back and who's going to stab you in the arm.
	We'll be right back. The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you.
	Well, it looks like Rumble is down.
	This is a site-wide issue, says Travis.
	He says some streamers seem to still be live, but most are not.
	I'm not really sure what is going on with it.
	Something similar happened, was it last week, I think?
	But before Rumble went down, Brian Potty, 60, thank you very much.
	That's very generous. Left $100 tip.
	He said, two full years of following you and I'll continue to do so.
	Thank you very much. He says, thank you for your truth, honesty, and dignity.
	Well, thank you. I appreciate that.
	And I don't know if he can hear that or not.
	Maybe he'll catch the show somewhere else.
	But let's talk a little bit.
	About Peter Thiel in the context of what is happening.
	Of course, Davos World Economic Forum is calling for collective action to fight misinformation, disinformation, collective action essentially to censor their opponents.
	That's what this truly is about.
	And this is happening as we see the UN releasing its framework for digital IDs for permission to do everything.
	It's all part of a big plan.
	And It's always problem-solution, right?
	Let's have chaos so we can do control.
	There's a method to their madness.
	I mean, you know, you look at somebody like George Soros.
	Turn all the prisoners out!
	Release! Kraken!
	Open up the gates to Arkham Asylum.
	Well, there is a reason for all that.
	There's a reason that they're opening up the borders, the reason that they're opening up the prisons, the reason that they're releasing everybody.
	They're creating that problem because they've got a solution in mind.
	They create chaos and So they can make themselves, put themselves in control.
	And one of the things that you see happening with this, of course, is because theft is rising so much that even the big box retailers from Wall Street can't sustain it.
	So they're closing stores.
	Rising theft is being used to justify artificial intelligence surveillance in stores.
	There you go. What they wanted.
	But see, they just have to do it.
	And it's the same type of thing that they're doing with the border.
	Oh, look, we let in all of these young single men from all these countries that we're at war with and all the rest of the stuff, and we're just blown up.
	I can't understand why. But that means that you, Mr.
	and Mrs. America, are going to have to get an ID. Oh, look, we got rampant child pornography all over the internet and all the rest of the stuff.
	So we're going to have to have IDs for everybody to use the internet.
	We got fake artificial intelligence pictures.
	So you're all going to have to prove that you're real, not the AI and so forth.
	So it's always about exercising their control.
	And so I was talking about Peter Thiel.
	This was put out by Business Insider.
	I'm going to tell you why they put this out.
	As I said... You know, Palantir, PayPal, they've always been government informants.
	Nothing new about it.
	It's interesting that nobody really wanted to talk about that.
	I talked about it for a very long time, and I guess that's maybe one of the reasons why I was punished by PayPal for talking about that.
	Peter Thiel has worn many hats over the years, says Business Insider.
	Silicon Valley founder, Trump mega-donor, cryptocurrency booster, democracy skeptic.
	Well, the democracy skeptic part of this is that he wants to set up a technocracy.
	In that regard, he and the other guy who set up PayPal, Elon Musk, both of them are technocrats.
	They're not on our side.
	And both of them have pretended to identify with libertarian or conservative values to make us think that they're on our side.
	Peter Thiel was never on our side.
	Elon Musk has never been on our side and is not on our side now.
	He may be doing some things that we interpret that way on Twitter, but it's ultimately for his own interest and ultimately for transhumanism.
	Both of them are transhumanists.
	Both of them are looking for a technocracy.
	Again, I'll just remind you, it was Elon Musk's grandfather, Joshua Haldane, Who in the 1930s as transhumanism, I'm sorry, not trans, technocracy, of course, it's always the same people, isn't it?
	Whether you're talking about Aldous Huxley pushing the technocracy, or H.G. Wells, or whether you're talking about Huxley's brother, Julian, who coined the term transhumanist, they always are after the same thing.
	They're going to rule us all via technology.
	They're smarter than we are.
	We're nothing. We don't deserve self-governance.
	We don't deserve individual rights.
	And of course, we get individual rights from anyway if there is no God.
	These people think they are God.
	By the way, they think that they're channeling God, from what I've heard at the Burning Man Festival as well, with their drugs.
	But that aside...
	Yeah, the technocracy aspect of it, the transhumanist aspect, people have not talked about that, and they've not talked about Palantir, which has been marketed to the military, it's been marketed to the intelligence agencies, it's been marketed to domestic law enforcement, to Surveil America.
	Massive part of the surveillance state.
	Alex Karp is running it, but it was...
	It was Peter Thiel who gave it the money and put the thing together.
	And their posters are all over Washington, D.C., or at least used to be when I did that report.
	Again, a reference, referencing themselves to J.R.R. Tolkien and identifying essentially with Sauron.
	In the summer of 2021, Thiel began providing information as a confidential human source to Jonathan Buma, An L.A.-based FBI agent who specializes in investigating political corruption and foreign influence campaigns.
	But again, this is nothing compared to Palantir and to PayPal.
	Thiel did speak to Buma occasionally.
	The source said that any assistance that Thiel might have provided to the FBI should be understood as part of Thiel's gradual distancing of himself.
	Listen to this. From Trump and from the broader MAGA movement.
	Which has vigorously criticized the FBI and other federal law enforcement agencies.
	And that's what this Business Insider article is all about.
	No surprise.
	No surprise. Peter Thiel has never been on our side.
	He got behind Trump.
	But Trump is not on our side either.
	And this is a PR move, this Business Insider report, to distance himself.
	From the MAGA movement. And that's all that this is about, quite frankly.
	And if you go back and you look at, you know, Ray Epps, for example, right?
	Ray Epps is going to sue, he said, I don't know if he's going through the lawsuit or not.
	He's going to sue Tucker Carlson, sue Fox News for calling him a federal informant, a federal agent.
	And as the man who continually attacked him for being that, why?
	To distract from the fact that, like I said before, regardless of Ray Epps, he whispered into the ear of a couple of people, so what?
	Even if he was telling them to do this, so what?
	Who told them to come?
	Who gave them the hope that they could change things?
	Who got them whipped into a frenzy?
	Who made millions of dollars?
	Well, people like Alex Jones, who stopped the steal, people like Donald Trump, who made hundreds of millions of dollars, were the ones who instigated this.
	They were pushing people.
	You want to know who's to blame for that?
	Don't blame Ray Epps, even if he is a Fed informant.
	He had very little to do with any of that stuff, doing his darndest if he was a Fed informant.
	But Darren Beattie focused on him, who has a revolver, And, of course, outing him as a Fed to try to distract attention to what the leaders of the MAGA movement, the influencers of the MAGA movement, including Trump, had done to their own people.
	You know, stealing their wallet and throwing them under the bus.
	To distract from that, they focused on him.
	And so when he said, I'm going to sue Tucker and I'm going to sue Fox News...
	I didn't say he's going to sue Darren Beatty because Darren Beatty probably doesn't have deep pockets like that.
	But he was the one who was going on all these different talk show shows.
	Tucker and Alex and all the rest of this stuff.
	I guess talk show ho, that was kind of a Freudian slip, I guess.
	A bunch of hoes out there.
	But anyway...
	Darren Beattie's response to that was he said, and I forget the person who it was, some rapper, and somebody accused them of being a government informant.
	And he sued them for that.
	And when it got before the judge, the judge says, well, there's nothing wrong with being a government informant.
	I don't see how you're damaged by that.
	And Darren Peaty said, this is what's going to happen if Ray Epps tries to sue Tucker or anybody else.
	The judge is going to say, well, it's great being a government informant.
	Look, they're very happy with Peter Thiel being a government informant.
	And he has done more than informed the government.
	You say stooge like it's a bad thing.
	Yeah. It's not a bad thing.
	Well, the guy who was the target of this stuff, Johnson addressed this Business Insider piece on a post on Substack, says Information Liberation.
	Charles Johnson, he says, on my extracurricular activities and the Business Insider Peter Thiel story and the Founders Fund.
	Founders Fund is what Peter Thiel put together.
	They call it The PayPal Mafia.
	Because so many people made so much money out of PayPal.
	They became investors in all these different companies.
	And Peter Thiel, they call him the godfather of the PayPal Mafia.
	And so Johnson said, so why did Peter Thiel buy the NXIVM property that he gave to his lover?
	It's really interesting, isn't it?
	He said. He says, I don't know whether Information Liberation says, I don't know whether anything he's saying is true, but I do remember Thiel's talk at the RNC in 2016 encouraged Republicans to surrender on the culture war.
	And it completely missed the mark.
	It reminds me of how Israel first vulture capitalist Peter Singer says, information liberation, how he dumped millions of dollars into the GOP to get them to surrender on gay marriage.
	Johnson last week also claimed that he personally saw Ben Shapiro, quote, receive tasking from Israeli intelligence connected to Netanyahu, quote-unquote, when he worked next to him at Breitbart.
	He said on Twitter, he said, I want to be fully on record that I saw Ben Shapiro receive tasking from Israeli intelligence connects to Netanyahu when I worked next to him.
	When I asked about it, he said he always kept close ties.
	And then Johnson says, it's time for Ben to register under FARA, Foreign Agents Registration Act.
	Well, I think that's true of a lot of people.
	I think we've got a lot of people who are more interested in a foreign country than they are in America.
	And I would certainly put Ben Shapiro in that class, regardless of what, even before I saw this from Johnson.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	And by the way, Rumble is back up.
	If you've gone to another platform and you prefer to be on Rumble, Rumble is back up, Travis says.
	We'll be right back. Thank
	you. Making
	sense. Common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, let's talk about Biden's war against the United States.
	And of course, he's gone to war with us in many different ways, hasn't he?
	He's gone to war against our energy, against our freedoms, against our choices in so many different areas.
	But he's also engaged in a demographic warfare against us.
	A resurfaced video shows Houston-based Muslim children pledging to be soldiers, martyrs for an Iranian Ayatollah.
	Now, here's the picture here.
	This is Houston.
	This is Houston. As warnings of possible Islamic terrorist attacks within the U.S. intensify, a resurfaced clip shows hundreds of American children From the heart of Texas, chanting references to Iran's supreme leader, pledging allegiance to him, while praising martyrdom.
	The chilling video indicating a terrifying influence within the U.S. of the Islamic Republic, the largest state sponsor of terrorism worldwide, was aired by Iranian state media last year.
	Iran's state-run Fars News Agency, affiliated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, along with other Iranian outlets, including Mare News Agency, affiliated with Iran's Ministry of Intelligence and Security, promoted the video in which young children and teenagers are shown in traditional Islamic dress outside the Houston Islamic Education Association.
	And the two-minute clip originally posted on their Facebook page of the Islamic Education Center of Houston, subsequently removed from YouTube, the Houston-area children put on headbands, waved flags, seen singing a trending Iranian religious song as they swear allegiance to the regime's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
	Now, how is that that much different from Rashida Tlaib?
	Well, she's Palestinian, she says, instead of Iranian.
	But her allegiance has always been, from the very moment she was elected, if you recall, I vividly remember it.
	She wrapped herself in the Palestinian flag when she was elected to Congress, not the American flag.
	Her mother was there, and her mother and her other relatives were, And she's talking about Palestine, and they're going, you know, that thing that they do.
	I mean, it's like, wow.
	Is she a colonizer?
	Is that what this is about?
	You know, it really is.
	And this is, of course, the central thing that they want to use, their justification for killing us.
	Oh, you're a colonizer.
	Well, they are colonizers.
	In the two-minute clip, again, you see them singing and the rest of the stuff.
	The song that they're singing there, described as an expression of one's love for the imam of our age.
	Lyrics of the chant are a salutations commander, is what the name of it is.
	But the lyrics include expressions of desires to become child soldiers for Khomeini, as well as taking an oath to become a martyr.
	A martyr. A witness?
	No, no, no. They don't mean that, of course, by their martyr stuff.
	That's how people use terms.
	They saw Christians being killed because they would not recant what they had seen.
	Oh, well, okay.
	We'll be martyrs for our religion.
	That means, though, that we will be murderers and suicide bombers.
	No, it's not that at all.
	The original Persian song also references slain Iranian General Soleimani with one line stating, I promise to be your high Kwasim, I guess, which is his first name.
	Soleimani's first name.
	Houston Imam, chairman of the Islamic Education Center's board of directors, compared the song to a catchy Beatles track.
	Revolution number nine, I guess.
	According to the Tehran Times, the song which expresses support for the Islamic Revolution has revealed the vivid hopes, quote-unquote, Iranian families and their children pin on the Islamic Republic and their quest for achieving the goals of the revolution.
	Well, if you love the Iranian government so much, why don't you go there?
	Now, they're colonizers.
	They're here to colonize us.
	You see, that's what the, again, I'll get into all the colonization stuff, but you understand that's their purpose here.
	The Houston Chronicle featured a front-page piece expressing concerns over the matter, claiming that Houston-area schoolchildren had become, quote, the face of Iranian propaganda, unquote.
	Houston Chronicle is not a conservative paper, anything but.
	Houston-based Iranian entrepreneur.
	Karim Zenggana, affiliated with the Organization of Iranian-American Communities, warned about the agenda of these people.
	He's an Iranian. He says, you better be careful.
	There's a lot of Iranians in Iran who don't like the Islamic Republic.
	The Houston senator had previously sparked controversy when in 2019 it held a ceremony marking the 40th anniversary of the Islamic Revolution in Iran.
	And the children saying, Khamenei is our leader, we are his soldiers.
	At the time, Iranian state media published a video clip boasting of the regime's nuclear capabilities, claiming that it can, in a moment's notice, transform its nuclear program into a, quote, atomic military, unquote, creating a nightmare for Israel and the West, they said, while warning of its ability to turn New York into a heap of rubble from hell.
	Too late. New York is already a heap of rubble from hell because of Democrat policies.
	They've nuked that place with their policies.
	So you might have to focus on somewhere else.
	The clip is entitled, When Will Iran's Nuclear Bombs Wake Up From Their Sleep?
	Yeah, well, the U.S. has seen increasing apprehensions from individuals and countries of special interest.
	They mean apprehensions.
	They mean they catch them and release them at the border.
	On Thursday, two Lebanese nationals were apprehended by Customs and Border Patrol at the southern border in Texas, and they were then identified as, quote, special interest aliens.
	Now, when I was talking about what happened in Denmark, again, they don't track people by their ethnicity.
	They track them by their country that they came from.
	And so most of the Palestinians that came into Denmark, as we were talking about it, remember about two-thirds of them had committed crimes and so forth.
	And about 75% of the women and 60-some-odd percent of the men were on welfare.
	But they were coming from Lebanon for the most part.
	Why? Well, because that was the country that let the Palestinians in.
	And they destroyed that country.
	And so these are Lebanese nationals, but not just any Lebanese nationals.
	These two guys are special interest aliens, which means that they have an idea that they may be terrorist sleeper cells.
	According to the Department of Homeland Security and Breitbart, a review by Breitbart in Texas, 61,471 migrants from special interest countries entered the U.S. in fiscal year 2023, which is not quite finished yet, I think. A source within U.S. Customs Border Protection revealed that most of the migrants, mainly single adult males, from countries subject to travel warnings by the U.S. State Department.
	Why? Well, because these are people that Obama was at war with.
	Due to terrorism, these people were released in the U.S. in order to pursue asylum claims.
	This is Biden's Arkham Asylum rules.
	Just release the criminals, the terrorists, everybody into our country.
	11 Middle Eastern migrants were found in the Texas border sector in just one week, according to a source within Border Patrol.
	11 from Middle Eastern nations encountered in less than one week.
	Immediately beginning the day after the Palestinian attacks into Israel, Border Patrol agents apprehended six Iranian nationals immediately after this Hamas attack on Israel.
	Three Lebanese nationals, one Egyptian national, one Saudi Arabian national.
	How many of them does it take?
	You know, we've seen, you know, the next day in Egypt, saw a police officer there in Egypt.
	Shoot, Israeli tourists killed two of them and killed one Egyptian.
	I don't know if that was a tour guide or just an innocent bystander.
	And we just had somebody who was multiple times deported and he just killed two people in Belgium.
	The lack of diplomatic relations with some of the special interest countries makes the return of migrants difficult.
	Yeah, if you're at war with them, Maybe they don't want to take back the soldiers that they interjected into your open borders, that Biden has done that.
	So they point out that in the last year, special interest aliens entering the United States fiscal year 2023, these are people coming across the border.
	These are not necessarily the Afghans who were helping the American soldiers as translators.
	We left behind hundreds of them.
	To be killed. But these are people who just came across the border and we happened to catch this many of them and then of course release them.
	5,600 Afghans, 3,000 Egyptians, 2,500 Somalis, 2,500 citizens of Bangladesh, nearly 1,300 Pakistanis, 1,200 Eritreans, and almost 1,000 nationals of Tajikistan and Kazakhstan.
	We're going to put together like some 12 Days of Christmas type of thing where you can count down all the different ethnic groups that Biden is injecting into our country for his demographic war.
	So, with all this happening, you've got people like Nuki Haley who jumped in and said, we need to take Palestinians.
	And Jamal Bowman, she...
	I walked that back, but Jamal Bowman of the squad has not, and neither have any of the other of them, and so the question remains as to whether or not that's going to happen.
	You've got some Republicans who are saying we've got to stop that, but of course they can't even...
	Agree on who they want to have as a speaker, and as long as they don't even have a speaker, nothing is going to come out of that clown show.
	We can't let Biden abuse our parole and visa rules to bring unvetted Palestinians into the American communities the way he did with thousands of unvetted Afghans, said the congressman.
	While he left behind, vetted translators and people who helped them also left behind Americans, didn't he?
	Always leave behind the Americans.
	As I pointed out, as we're seeing the explosion of people coming across the border from countries that we're at war with, countries that have radical Marxist and Islamicist governments, what have they done for Christian refugees, real refugees who are fleeing these different countries because they're going to kill them?
	Well, Biden has reduced that by 90%.
	Biden even wants to throw out a German homeschooling family here in Tennessee that had been given sanctuary for a few years.
	So, when we look at this, this truly is a war against us.
	And you need to see that aspect of it without getting so caught up in the Israeli versus Hamas stuff as well.
	But of course, the people who are going to be vetting this, as I briefly said yesterday, the U.S. government has hired a pro-Hamas PLO spokeswoman to handle these asylum cases.
	Who do you think? This is going to be the person who gets to decide who comes in.
	Who do you think she's going to decide gets to come in?
	I mean, it sounds like something out of the Babylon Bee.
	It really does. And that's a picture.
	Look at that picture. Scroll up and show that picture.
	That's a picture on her social media account.
	You know, some terrorist with a paraglider and a gun and a whole bunch of them, and they're flying over the Muslim mosque there in Jerusalem.
	It's like something out of the Babylon Bee.
	They would say, you know, who gets to decide who comes in and gets asylum?
	Well, it's going to be a pro-Hamas, pro-PLO woman.
	The U.S. Immigration Enforcement Agency hired a former spokesperson for the PLO, put her in a position to determine who gets to come into the country as an immigrant or as a refugee seeking asylum.
	Now the Department of Homeland Security officer is repeatedly posting pictures of Hamas terrorists parachuting in with guns and writing F Israel and any Jew who supports Israel.
	She worked in 2016 and 17 as a public affairs officer for the Palestinian delegation in the U.S.
	She served as the PLO office in D.C.
	She actually worked for the PLO in Washington, D.C.
	Until the Biden people bring her in and put her in charge of immigration.
	You have to understand where these people are coming from.
	And we're going to talk about that.
	And we're going to talk about the hate.
	And we're going to talk about where do we draw the line on all of this stuff?
	And how do we keep from getting drawn into this fight in another country?
	Well, you know, of course, Washington warned us against entangling alliances.
	And we're about to find out why, I guess.
	This January, she moved over to being an adjudication officer for Customs and Immigration.
	People with that job, according to the agency, quote, analyze new or amended legislation and policy, prepare written reports of findings and review and make determination on cases for immigration benefits.
	And she has posted extremist rhetoric continuously to Facebook, Instagram, Twitter for years, rhetoric that intensified this month.
	With a terrorist attack that she cheered.
	And she said, F Israel, the government and its military, are you ready for your downfall?
	According to her social media profile, she says she is, quote, American-born Palestinian at heart.
	She's from Dearborn, Michigan, a hotbed of unassimilated immigrants where thousands reportedly took to the streets in support of the terrorist attacks.
	Ali has made several posts glorifying the terrorist attack in Israel.
	And as I said, one of the posts says, respect our existence or expect resistance.
	Simple, no apologies.
	She said, and here's a key, Israeli and American privilege privilege.
	I've said this from the very beginning.
	You have to understand that the rhetoric that they're using against the Israeli, and I don't support the Israeli government, and I certainly don't support Netanyahu.
	Netanyahu, as far as I'm concerned, is a traitor to his people.
	There's not a war that he hasn't wanted to send them to fight, and he's no different from McCain or Nuki Haley or Lindsey Graham.
	Netanyahu has tried to push his people and our people into every single war that has come up this century.
	And he'll do it again.
	Look, this is what politicians do.
	It's what our politicians do.
	It's what their politicians do.
	And so I don't excuse the policies of the Israelis.
	And I certainly am not an apologist or a fan or a supporter.
	And I don't agree with Netanyahu on basically anything.
	But we have to understand the difference between terror and war.
	And we have to understand that when a state does it, it's not state-sponsored terrorism.
	It's just simply war crimes.
	War crimes are as bad as terrorism.
	And we ought to condemn both of those.
	But we don't want to get drawn into this back and forth, but they're drawing this in.
	And these leftists who have been saying that we are colonizers, that we stole this country, that we exploited people, If we agree with them, we will agree with the argument that is going to be used to slit our throats.
	It's just that simple.
	It is a Marxist argument.
	And I'll talk more about that in a moment.
	But this is an indication, you know, the fact that he is at war with America.
	And, of course, when they contacted her, Asked if she had disclosed her employment with a PLO to the Department of Homeland Security when they hired her.
	She said, that's none of your effing business.
	Mind your business before I call the police.
	If I were you, I'd respectfully hang up on the phone right now.
	So, there you go.
	An angry radical, given the power of government, as so many have been, in the Biden administration.
	The Biden administration is just so weaponized.
	Against everything that America has ever stood for.
	But again, you know, this is not to say that Republicans are going to save us.
	The Republicans are just slow walking the same policies or joining with them on these same policies.
	So we're going to take a quick break and when we come back, we're going to talk about hate.
	And how do we keep from getting drawn into this Ancient War of Hate.
	How do we keep from getting drawn into other people's wars?
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right ��
	��
	�� Liberty.
	It's your move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Well, speaking of the radical foreign trader Rashida Tlaib, she says, I'm not going to forget this, and her comments as she was leading an insurrection.
	Taking over the Capitol. Look, we pointed out over and over again as they freaked out about January the 6th.
	We said, well, you didn't do anything about Black Lives Matter.
	You said they were mostly peaceful.
	They burned cities and the rest of this stuff.
	But now we have seen both yesterday as well as what we saw in Tennessee.
	In Tennessee over gun control.
	You had the radical left show up.
	They flooded into the state capitol there.
	They were shoving and grabbing legislators who were surrounded by state police, and they're shoving the police.
	The police were not all suited up in armor like the capitol police.
	They didn't tear gas or beat anybody.
	They were passive.
	They just used their bodies as shields to the legislators, but they still got their hands on the legislators.
	They still pushed them. They took over the floor of the Tennessee Three Dead.
	And just took it over and shouted with their people in the balcony.
	That's not a problem.
	A similar thing happened in Kentucky.
	And then you've got this in the Capitol with Rashida Tlaib leading it.
	When are we going to stop funding continued oppression of indigenous communities?
	You see? See what she's saying?
	Indigenous communities. And this is the anti-colonizer rhetoric that they're going to use against us here in America as well.
	They've been using it for quite some time.
	Again, somebody who herself has come here as a colonist.
	That's what she is.
	But this is the Marxist rhetoric that we see.
	Who is going to stop the continued oppression of indigenous communities?
	Well, I would agree with that because I'm an indigenous American myself.
	When I met Karen, she was from New York.
	And a lot of people in New York, first or second generation immigrants.
	She was second generation.
	And her grandparents had come over, but a lot of her aunts and uncles were even born in Italy.
	A similar thing on her father's side, you know, coming from Poland, coming from Russia.
	But, you know, so when we met, she said, so where are you from?
	You know, what do you mean?
	I'm from Tampa, you know.
	It's like, no, I don't mean you're, you know, what ethnic group are you?
	I said, I'm an American. She says, oh, come on, everybody says that, you know, you're American.
	But really, where'd they come from?
	I said, no, seriously. I have no idea.
	And I don't care.
	I'm an American. I'm an indigenous American.
	I don't have any hyphen there.
	My culture is American.
	My people are American.
	They've been here for centuries.
	And I make no apologies about that.
	And it bothers me, quite frankly.
	Fine, you like your culture?
	That's fine. Italian Americans are not trying to overthrow the country.
	They're not complaining about colonizers and all the rest of this stuff.
	But there's a lot of people who are hyphenated Americans who are complaining about all this stuff.
	So, yeah, I don't have anywhere else to go.
	I'm an American. You know, when Russell Means was with the American Indian Movement, he said, we're going to call ourselves American Indians.
	We're not going to call ourselves indigenous people.
	We're not going to call ourselves Native Americans because there are people whose families have been here for centuries like mine.
	And they see themselves as indigenous.
	So let's distinguish ourselves.
	He said, yeah, I know that Christopher Columbus thought he was in India.
	He didn't know even where he was.
	But let's just go with American Indians so we understand, you know, exactly who we are.
	And also because there are a lot of us who are native to this country.
	So, and it was, I really understood that as well when I looked to To go somewhere else, as I saw this country being taken over by authoritarian people.
	And we went to New Zealand.
	It was with a view of perhaps moving there, if it was going to be freer.
	There was not as many people there.
	Only about 4 million people at the time.
	They had more sheep than they did people.
	Well, that's a good equation.
	We've got more sheep than we do Americans here now, don't we?
	But... You know, when I went there, I was like, no, this just doesn't feel right.
	You know? I'm just too ingrained in this country.
	So don't talk to me about indigenous people.
	You're not indigenous, you hypocrite, Rashida Tlaib.
	Go back to Palestine, where you belong, where you want to be, where your heart is.
	Why stay in a country that you don't like?
	Go home, Rashida.
	Go home. Leave us alone.
	The baseless assertion reminded me of the conspiracy theories.
	This is talking about Charlie Kirk.
	I'm sorry, skipped over the page here.
	Let me introduce this.
	This is written by Jeffrey Scott Shapiro, who is on the editorial staff of the Washington Times.
	And he was very angry about Charlie Kirk.
	Floating the idea that Netanyahu had stood down and let Hamas slaughter Jews for his geopolitical gains.
	Of course, Netanyahu would never do anything like that, right?
	I played the clips for you how he used his...
	He surrendered his people.
	So the World Economic Forum and the Globalist Agenda bragged about how he's going to use them as lab rats for Pfizer.
	He did it multiple times.
	I played the clips of him doing it publicly, doing it to the World Economic Forum.
	And of course, it's not just that.
	You see, that is something that is easier for people to see, what a betrayal that is.
	But do you not understand that every war is a calculation by the people in charge?
	To use us for their political agenda.
	To take our lives as cheap and expendable for their political agenda.
	The vaccine thing was just another way of doing this.
	But every single war is all you people in the military, all you civilians, all of you are expendable to our geopolitical goals.
	And we don't care about your lives.
	It's always that way.
	So why would we say, well, Netanyahu would never do something like that?
	Of course he would. He's cheerleaded for every single war.
	We had to go into Iraq because they had weapons of mass destruction.
	We had to go into Iran because they were going to build a bomb and he makes a little, you know, thing of a cartoon bomb from Warner Brothers cartoons, you know.
	He's pushed every single war.
	He's not afraid of killing people in other countries, but he's also not trying to spare the lives of his own people either for his political agenda.
	And so you have this guy, Shapiro, at Washington Times, one of the editorial staff.
	He says, the baseless assertion from Charlie Kirk that Benjamin Netanyahu would essentially open the way for Hamas to come in.
	That just is just insane.
	Well, no, it's not.
	And why is it that Americans understand it's not?
	Well, because we've been betrayed that same way by FDR. Now, that doesn't justify what the Japanese did, as I said on the very first day.
	And it doesn't justify what Hamas did.
	What it does is it condemns FDR and it condemns Netanyahu as well.
	And this is not a theory that they would do something like this.
	He said, the baseless assertion reminded me of these conspiracy theories that suggested that FDR had foreknowledge about Pearl Harbor, but kept quiet.
	So it would be a pretext to enter World War II. And the urban legends that George W. Bush administration orchestrated the 9-11 attacks to give the U.S. a reason to invade Iraq.
	And of course also to turn the USA into a police surveillance state.
	This is the Washington Times.
	This is an editor of the Washington Times who thinks like this.
	Boy, this guy thinks you're really stupid, doesn't he?
	If he really believes in stuff, he's really stupid.
	And so, he said a town hall contributor wrote on Twitter, just so we're clear, Charlie Kirk is now implying that Netanyahu purposely let Hamas murder 1,200 Israelis, behead children, take 100-plus people hostage, all part of a plan to acquire more power in Israel.
	Unbelievable. Why is that unbelievable?
	Again, he's been on the side of McCain, Lindsey Graham, Nuki Haley, all these people.
	He's pushed hard for every single war.
	Lindsey Graham doesn't care.
	Nuki Haley doesn't care about our people.
	And they don't know the scope of what's going to wind up happening, just as FDR, I think, was surprised by the scope of what happened with Pearl Harbor.
	But they're willing to put you on the line.
	Netanyahu was willing to sacrifice his own people to the vaccine agenda and the globalist agenda.
	So why would this be surprising?
	Again, Kirk said the whole country is surveilled.
	Let me just kind of go through this.
	We don't talk about Israeli politics very often, and most Americans don't know this.
	The last nine months, Israel was on the brink of civil war.
	That's not an exaggeration.
	There's this judicial stuff there.
	There were hundreds of thousands of Israelis taking to the streets because Netanyahu was basically redefining the Israeli constitution.
	It's not an exaggeration.
	He said the judicial branch has too much power.
	Well, look, I agree with that aspect of it.
	You know, he's looking at judicial supremacy in an activist court.
	We have the same problem here.
	But it was very divisive.
	You know, there wasn't a clear consensus there.
	He had narrowly won an election several times, but in terms of he never got a plurality.
	And so he had to try to create, because of the parliamentary system, You had to try to create a coalition government, and they tried and failed and tried and failed and tried and failed and had election after election.
	Yeah, it was very shaky.
	And, of course, we all know that war is the lifeblood of the state.
	We all know that when there is a war, okay, put aside our political differences and let's unite behind this guy.
	Even if we don't agree with him on anything, we unite behind him.
	That is a very old political tactic.
	Anyway, he said, Charlie Kirk was saying there were protests this week against Netanyahu where they anticipated tens of thousands of people to take to the streets.
	Now that is all gone.
	Netanyahu now has an emergency government and a mandate to lead it.
	I'm not willing to go so far to say that Netanyahu knew or there was intelligence here, but I think some questions need to be asked.
	Was there a stand-down order?
	It took six hours? I don't believe it.
	Now, what we've seen since then is that the people who came in had intelligence and they went into...
	They did attack not just civilians, but they attacked the military first.
	They had very detailed information about the military.
	That may explain some of why it took so long.
	That would explain why it took so long.
	Because they were killing the soldiers.
	Where are the soldiers?
	Well, they're dead. They've already killed them first.
	But it doesn't explain how they could be caught so flat-footed.
	And of course, Netanyahu has been in charge of that government for quite some time.
	And it does beggar belief that they were not monitoring the situation.
	Especially when you see them release what they said or recordings of people talking about the rocket that they say was Hamas rocket that fell on the hospital or now fell on the parking lot or whatever.
	And there's a lot of inconsistencies here in all of this stuff.
	Anyway... This guy, Shapiro, who is the Washington Times editorial board member, said, just last month, Human Events reported Mr.
	Kirk denigrated Ukrainian President Zelensky as a grifter and accused him of having Nazis in his military.
	Imagine, how clueless is this guy who was at the Washington Times?
	He doesn't understand that?
	You don't understand that Zelensky is...
	Even Bill Gates has told us that the Ukrainian government is the most corrupt government on earth.
	This guy says, can you imagine this?
	Charlie Kirk calling our ally a grifter?
	Saying our ally's got Nazis in his military?
	They are Nazis! They're literal Nazis.
	They're not just Nazi sympathizers.
	I mean, you know, they got the patches and all the rest of this stuff.
	Say, Hans, are we the patties?
	Why have we got skulls on our uniform that say SS? They literally got SS symbols on their uniforms.
	Some might say that Mr.
	Kirk's comments demonstrate ignorance, but he may just lack a conscience or be evil, says Shapiro.
	Bolstering terrorist propaganda is evil because it casts aspersions on heroes, and it mitigates the guilt of those responsible for their crimes against humanity.
	No? No, Japan was still responsible for its actions.
	It was still infamy.
	It's just that FDR bared some responsibility for opening the gates and letting them in, not knowing how many people they're going to kill.
	You know, leave the lock off, knowing that they're prowling around outside.
	Mr. Kirk, he says, should resign or be removed as head of TPUSA or the right will and should suffer the consequences of its inaction.
	Wow. Never thought I'd be defending Charlie Kirk.
	What's this guy want to do?
	Cancel him. Censor him.
	Cancel him. He's wrong. Well, this guy's wrong about everything.
	He's totally clueless. This Washington Times editor, totally clueless about history.
	Totally clueless about it.
	Totally clueless about the people he's defending.
	Netanyahu and Zelensky, totally clueless about it.
	And yet, what's his response to all this stuff?
	Cancel him. Censor him.
	Punish him. These so-called conservatives.
	Yeah, we find out what they're really about, don't we?
	We find out that they're not really any different from the left.
	That's my point. So now we go back to the insurrection, the pro-Palestinian protesters occupying the Capitol building, the far left.
	Far left, pro-Palestinian protests continue in the U.S. with activists occupying the Capitol, accusing lawmakers of having Palestinian blood on their hands.
	Yeah, it looks like, you know, one man's protester is another man's insurrectionist, isn't it?
	And so you see the people on the right saying, lock them all up, lock them all up.
	Or maybe what we had to do is let the January of the 6th people go.
	Let's not be reactionary.
	Let's not be prodded into this civil war.
	The Hamas soldiers who launched terrorist attacks, killing civilians in Israel, are dismissed down the memory hole.
	And now the focus is only on the Palestinian tragedy.
	The most logical decision is for America to stay out of the conflict completely.
	Yes. However, rabid involvement by leftists on the side of Hamas may actually push a majority of Americans to throw full support behind Israel, simply because any cause that is backed by these leftist organizations is a cause that is worth obstructing.
	The public will ask themselves, when have these people ever been right?
	Well, see, that's our challenge.
	We've got to rise above that knee-jerk reactionaryism, if that's a word.
	Don't be reactionary.
	Put it that way. The U.S. Capitol taken over from the inside and from the outside by pro-Palestinian protesters as Rashida Tlaib spoke with a crowd nearby.
	Yeah, again, it's not an insurrection if they do it at the U.S. Capitol, at the Tennessee Capitol, the Kentucky Capitol, not an insurrection.
	Not an insurrection. And then we have Jonathan Greenblatt of the Defamation League, who just days after saying every Jewish person is a Zionist, he came out and said any anti-Zionist Jews are a hate group.
	These people are totally deranged.
	Totally inconsistent.
	And of course, what is the central thing here?
	Well, if you don't believe me, and this has always been consistent about Jonathan Greenblatt and the so-called ADL, the Defamation League.
	If you don't agree with me, you're racist.
	You're a hate group, and you're racist.
	And I'm going to cancel you.
	I'm going to punish you. I'm going to censor you.
	He's just doing it to Jews now.
	It's the only thing that's different about this guy.
	Just three days after the ADL, CEO Jonathan Greenblatt went on MSNBC to declare that anti-Zionism is genocide because every Jewish person is a Zionist.
	He's now put out a new statement labeling the anti-Zionist Jews who protested at the Capitol a hate group, quote-unquote.
	He said these radical far-left groups, wait a minute, he's always been radical far-left, and he's always denounced anybody who isn't.
	An agreement with his radical far-left ideas.
	You're racist, you're anti-Semitic, and all the rest of the stuff.
	These radical far-left groups don't represent the Jewish community, he raged on Wednesday.
	And he says, far from it.
	They represent the ugly core of anti-Zionism, anti-Semitism.
	But he's very consistent, even though he's flip-flopping back and forth on this, he's very consistent.
	Again, anybody he disagrees with, hateful, racist, have to be punished, have to be censored.
	The Greenblatt limits who can respond to his posts.
	Only his followers can.
	Tim Wise, who calls himself an anti-racist activist, now describes himself as an anti-Zionist Jew, pushed back.
	He said, Jonathan, do you realize there's a long history of anti-Zionist Jews going back 120 years?
	He said that many of us simply reject all forms of religious, ethnic nationalism on principle.
	It is intellectually lazy to call that hate, unless you have specific information about specific people.
	But of course, Jonathan Greenblatt and the ADL has always been intellectually lazy.
	They are the premier hate group.
	They don't identify, you know, Southern Poverty Law Center, the ADL are hate groups.
	They thrive on, you know, pointing the finger at other people that they hate.
	And so, Information Liberation says, sorry, wise, you know that Green Black gets to decide who is and who is not Jewish.
	And if you don't support Israel ethnically cleansing their blood enemies from Gaza in a bitter ethno-religious feud, then you're not Jewish.
	And that makes you part of a hate group, equivalent to white supremacists, and in league with them as well.
	Greenblatt told MSNBC it would be, quote, wrong for me or anyone else to hold all Palestinian people responsible for Hamas, and, quote, it is wrong to hold any people collectively responsible.
	He then gave a speech where he held all pro-Palestinian protesters collectively responsible for the actions of Hamas.
	And also, any anti-Zionist Jews would be held responsible, you see.
	They're all accomplices, he said, quote-unquote.
	All accomplices.
	So, he, interestingly enough...
	Some of these college students who have been going around tearing down posters of people who were captured and are now hostages.
	Don't know if they're alive or not.
	But in a lot of different places, people put up posters of the people that have been abducted by these Hamas terrorists.
	And then in those colleges, many of the colleges, New York University is one, they would go up and they would tear down those posters and Well, it turns out that one of the people tearing down the posters at NYU was a former intern at the ADL. And how about that?
	I guess he doesn't even vet his interns to see what their politics are, to see if they align with him.
	But, of course, he demands everybody else be ethnically pure, right?
	But you've got somebody in your organization that did something that I don't agree with?
	Well, then you need to be purged.
	We've got people in his own organization that don't agree with him about this stuff.
	Maybe the ADL needs to be purged.
	They claim to battle anti-Semitism.
	Now they've scrubbed their website of information about a former intern who removed posters from New York University campus about Israeli hostages taken by Hamas.
	Yasmin Dehimi, a junior at NYU, one of several students who, quote, brazenly ripped down posters of Israeli hostages, said the New York Post.
	The ADL had hailed her as an activist, quote, extremely passionate about fighting racial profiling.
	Except that's where she is.
	Now, she has apologized after they outed her.
	But, of course, Jonathan Greenblatt doesn't really care about that type of thing.
	Haters won't be swayed, but Hamas lies about Gaza hospital blasts are being exposed.
	And here we go. You know, there is a good case.
	When we look at the pictures and even some of the video that shows it looks like perhaps, although I can't really tell, but a lot of people showing the video says it looks like this.
	It's nighttime. It looks like this.
	Rocket was launched there.
	You can see it being launched. It looks like it's turned and it's coming back at you because it gets bigger and then it goes down the ground and it looks like the rocket turned around and came back and struck there.
	So you make a good case for that.
	Again, when we look at any of the videos, when we look at any of the audio, I pointed out a couple of days ago, I said, okay, so we've got audio that's being put up by people who are anti-Israel government.
	And they say, well, look, we've got audio of a JDAM missile, and it sounds just like this thing.
	I said, well, I don't know if that's what that sounded like.
	I mean, it'd be easy for me to change the audio soundtrack on that.
	I have no way to vet if that is authentic or not.
	I don't have any way to vet whether the pictures that CNN is now showing of the missile that shot up and then turned around and came back.
	Is that the missile? I don't know.
	It's really hard to tell this stuff.
	And at the same time, we had the Israeli Defense Force put out an audio tape, said, look, we recorded, we got wiretaps going everywhere now.
	Now we know everything. Now we're omniscient, right?
	Now we're omniscient and we hear everything.
	And we got audio tapes of these people saying, oops, we made a mistake and it was our missile that landed and all the rest of this stuff.
	There's a lot of questions about even what they said.
	There's absolutely no way that we can vet that.
	Quite frankly, it sounds very phony to me.
	I would be inclined to believe it.
	And, you know, it may be true that that is exactly what happened.
	But over and over again, what we see is that people will add false details that keep pushing on their narrative.
	So even when they've got a true narrative, if the other people are adding lies, well, they'll add some lies to stoke up their narrative as well.
	That may be what's going on.
	And I'm sure, to some extent, that's what's happening everywhere.
	As I said, we'll never know exactly what happened because we can't trust anything that's coming from either one of these sides.
	This is why we don't need to get drawn into this thing, you understand?
	You know, the Palestinians are saying, and now a lot of people are saying, well, maybe 30 to 50 people were there in the parking lot that got killed instead of 300 to 500.
	They were saying the entire hospital's been destroyed.
	Well, the hospital is still standing.
	There's been a lot of exaggeration.
	To inflame the Muslim street on that.
	But then again, it appears to be exaggerations.
	Caitlin Johnstone, who does not like Israel, makes it very clear she doesn't like the Israeli government.
	She said, well, I can believe that either they didn't know anything and everybody came across the border, or that they know everything and they got this recording from these people there in Gaza.
	But she said, I can't believe that both of those things are true.
	I can believe one or the other, but I can't believe that both of them are true.
	That really is where we are.
	Let me read some of the comments because I see a bunch of them here.
	On Rumble, Timed Non-Tide says censorship, cancel culture, hate speech, BS is un-American, unwelcome here.
	That's right. Take it to your country.
	Take it to some other country.
	You shouldn't be welcome here. We should never embrace that.
	On Rock Fan, Angry Tiger, hey, how you doing?
	Says, my father came here from Italy, embraced the culture, racing cars, baseball.
	Ask him why we did not speak Italian.
	He said, we're Americans. And that's exactly what Karen's experience was.
	Both sides of her family, Polish and Italian.
	And that's what she said when I said, well, I'm an American.
	She said, everybody says that.
	No, really, where are your people from, you know?
	We're not saying that we're going to set up some other enclave.
	This is what Salenti says as well.
	He says, you know, I'm Italian-American, but I'm completely different from growing up here in America than I would be growing up in Italy.
	On Rockfin, Yona Anawodi says, Lakota elder Russell Means said, if you were born in America, you're Native American.
	That's exactly right.
	I agree with that. And she says, if you hold citizenship and passport from any other nation, you should be disqualified from holding American political office.
	I absolutely agree with that.
	And, you know, that's another thing that really bothered me about Trump.
	He supported Dr.
	Oz, who is a Turkish citizen.
	He was a member of the Turkish army.
	And he's not even an American citizen.
	He said, I'll get an American citizenship, or maybe he's a dual citizen.
	And he said, I'll give up my Turkish citizenship if I'm elected as senator, so I can get access to secret documents.
	It's like, oh, really? Well, you're going to give up your divided loyalty to your Turkish government that you seem to care more about?
	He's more connected to the Turkish government than he was to America.
	That was the guy...
	That Mr. Make America First Trump supported.
	It's like, absolutely not.
	I would never have voted for him.
	But anyway, there was a good candidate in that.
	A young black woman who pointed out that the two leading candidates were both Davos men.
	You know, Dr.
	Oz and the multi-millionaire billionaire who was running.
	But of course, Trump didn't support her.
	He looked at these other guys, and it's like, well, okay, one of them is a rich celebrity, and the other one's just really, really rich.
	I'm going to support one of them.
	He's not about principles at all.
	He's not even about America.
	Trump isn't. You know, you heard him say, well, Congress was controlled by Israel, and rightfully so.
	Rightfully so. Those Abraham Accords that everybody is so excited about?
	You know, we purchased that. Billions to this country and billions to that country.
	You and I paid for that.
	So that Trump and his son-in-law could parade themselves around in some kind of a competition for a Nobel Peace Prize, I suppose.
	Yeah, we paid them to sign a piece of paper.
	And look at how useful the Peace Accord is right now.
	Anyway, oh, Travis points out, you know, as a man, I'm sorry, I didn't.
	Sorry. I'm not trying to transgender you or anything.
	It's a name that I have not seen, but I absolutely agree with what you say.
	On Rockfin, MJ. We're not supposed to be looking at Pfizer stock and lawsuits that are and will be successfully getting damages.
	That's right. Yeah. So, I liked this article from Rachel Marzen.
	I thought she got it exactly right.
	She said, Grieving for peaceful Palestinians or Israelis shouldn't make you absolve terrorism or war crimes.
	The tragic war unfolding in the Middle East desperately needs compassion, not calls for more death or destruction.
	Rachel Marsden. She goes on to say, Can we denounce Hamas' attack without being labeled a Zionist shill?
	And can we defend Palestinian civilians without being labeled pro-terrorist?
	If not, then we have a serious problem here.
	Because that means that as Americans, we've been drawn into this.
	Well, you've got to take a side. Well, my country's not at war right now, and I don't want my country at war, and I'm not going to take a side in this.
	I think we need to take the path, the wise path that Switzerland has always taken, of neutrality and self-defense.
	Israel and Hamas are locked in a shooting war.
	It's understandable when Israelis and Palestinians, as rockets rain down on their heads, take extremely and indiscriminately aggressive positions against the respective other side in the conflict.
	But those of us observing the fighting from a distance don't have to do the same.
	And the fact is that a middle ground position is often criticized as appeasement, as proof of just how irrational and how extreme Western discourse has become.
	Again, because why? Because we're coming up to a fourth turning.
	But, you know, there are those who want to lock us into, we don't have to lock ourselves into a position on this thing.
	But people are trying to lock us into this shooting war.
	And they do that by creating polarization.
	That's how they do it.
	She goes on to say, ever since Gaza-dwelling Hamas attackers invaded Israel to kill and kidnap innocent Israeli citizens, and Israel responded by dropping bombs that have killed equally innocent Palestinian civilians, the rhetoric in support of both Israel and Palestine has veered to the extreme.
	This is about the last thing this conflict needs.
	Unfortunately, those with the most power and influence are some of the very worst offenders.
	Israel has a right to defend itself against terrorism.
	That's not a controversial position to take.
	Terrorism is bad, and we need to condemn it.
	Hamas' attack on Israeli civilians were the very definition of terrorism, an assault by non-state actors on civilians for political or ideological reasons.
	Acknowledging that doesn't mean that you're some kind of rabid Zionist or that you're in favor of giving carte blanche to Israel to react by indiscriminately bombing civilians or by failing to take reasonable measures to protect innocents in a proportionate response.
	The.
	She said the initial rhetoric of Western leaders, most notably the U.S. President and the Secretary of State, the only ones with any sort of influence on Israel, should have included this balanced perspective.
	She said care has to be taken to ensure that any retort is not used as a pretext for further victimization of Palestinians.
	At the very least, everybody should be concerned with not wanting to create a future with generations of embittered victims who are ripe for radicalization.
	It would also have been valuable for the U.S. administration to have painstakingly underscored and emphasized the difference between the Hamas terrorists who perpetrated the attack and the Palestinian people as a whole.
	I tried to do that on the very first day.
	I said, do you understand?
	Hamas is in charge there.
	That doesn't mean the Palestinian people necessarily support them.
	Biden is in charge. Do the American people support Biden?
	I don't support Biden.
	I don't support Trump for what they've done.
	They are the American government.
	The American government is being run by the CIA. Israel is probably being run by Mossad.
	Do you support Netanyahu?
	You don't have to support Netanyahu or the Israeli policies.
	Those are political policies.
	You need to be able to distinguish between the people of Israel And the people of Palestine and these governments who are doing these things.
	You know, we've got to stop falling into this groupthink tribalism.
	Where was the Western leadership with a not all Palestinians are animals, just the terrorist statement?
	Resistance to oppression is justified, she says.
	This slogan used by pro-Palestinian protesters in the U.S. over the weekend of the Hamas attacks on Israel is also not a controversial position to take.
	What is not ever justified is terrorism.
	Exactly. The question is, how do we resist?
	Do we resist by getting into terrorism?
	This is why I began by saying there's a distinction between the government of Israel and the people of Israel, between Hamas and the people of Gaza.
	There's a distinction between terrorism and a just war.
	There's a distinction between war crimes and a just war.
	Let's not jump in to the thing where there's already a lot of...
	We've already gotten into both sides.
	I've become very, very dark gray.
	You know, Gandhi and Martin Luther King used asymmetric warfare, didn't they?
	The asymmetric warfare of peaceful resistance, not violent resistance.
	They didn't resort to guerrilla terrorism, right?
	They didn't do roadside bombs or sniping or shooting innocent civilians.
	But these are the policies that are going to be used against us by the black-lying Marxists of BLM and by people like Rashida Tlaib and her PLO people.
	This is what they're going to use against us, and they'll feel justified for all of this because they'll say they're fighting colonizers.
	You know, the same thing actually happened in East Germany, frankly.
	I've talked about this many times.
	They were, you know, at the end of their 70-year period or so of communist rule.
	But when the wall came down, yes, you know, Russia was in deep problems with its failed institutions and everybody understood it.
	But in East Germany, they were pretty ruthless.
	You know, they had that German authoritarianism that's just a streak in their culture.
	And, you know, they'd been shooting anybody who tried to leave the country, tried to get past that wall.
	They had groups of people who started meeting on a regular basis, candlelight ceremonies.
	They'd meet at the churches, and they'd sing Christian songs and things like that.
	And it just got bigger and bigger.
	And, you know, one day they marched down, and they decided this is the time.
	They marched down, and they marched into the no-man zone.
	And they defied the people on the guard towers to shoot them.
	And they stood down.
	And I was with a group of people who did that against the American government.
	Armed BLM agents, Bureau of Land Management agents.
	Now, we had people who also had weapons.
	But I think it would have been just as effective if we didn't have weapons.
	I didn't have a weapon.
	I walked right up to those people.
	You have to have the ability to do peaceful resistance.
	And if they shoot you, they lose.
	They lose the bigger battle.
	And you can take that action if you understand what the big picture is.
	As I said over and over again, if you believe in God, And you believe in Christ, you've got a lever that is going to extend outside of this life, and that gives you leverage to change this world.
	You don't have to be fearful of losing your life.
	You have to be fearful of not doing the right thing.
	And this is the basis of this peaceful resistance.
	Conundrum Cluster has a substack.
	And I agree with this fundamental premise here.
	Maybe not every single word that he says here.
	But the fundamental premise, he says, do not intellectualize arguments for why you, you should be killed.
	And he talks about this whole colonizer thing.
	And he says, the response to the recent Hamas offensive, and maybe it's a woman.
	I don't know. I'm thinking that it's a guy, but I don't know.
	It's a pseudonym.
	The conundrum cluster could be anybody.
	The response to the recent Hamas offensive has divided the all-important American fringe, right, is what he talks about.
	And, you know, he uses the term fringe right throughout this thing.
	I think that that is one thing that I disagree with him on.
	I don't know if it's fringe or not.
	But anyway, that's irrelevant.
	That's kind of a pejorative term, isn't it?
	Why make it a pejorative term?
	It's some very objective observations.
	Why contaminate it with a pejorative?
	He says on one side are people who are echoing a number of valid criticisms of Israel and its impact on American foreign policy.
	On the other side are those who see the attacks as a larger movement towards decolonization and are therefore against Hamas, or at least in different ways.
	To the brutal Israeli reprisals against Hamas and Gaza that are no doubt to come.
	He said American leftists are openly saying that they view the Hamas attacks as part of a shared struggle against the white colonizer.
	This is one of the reasons why so many people will say they're Askenazi Jews.
	If you do that, you're now also jumping into this white colonizer label of stuff.
	Just as mainstream right-wingers have long accepted dubious claims from Israeli propagandists at face value, other right-wingers now appear to be accepting dubious claims from Palestinian propagandists without much scrutiny.
	For instance, people are claiming that that kidnapped woman who was last seen totally limp and stripped in a truck bed is actually fine, that she wasn't mistreated, and she's currently receiving care in a hospital.
	But the only evidence for this claim is that her family was told that by Palestinian authorities.
	And I don't believe that for a second, he said.
	And I don't believe it either.
	Complicating matters further is that you can't really trust your own eyes anymore.
	AI is increasingly sophisticated.
	And a lot of atrocity photos are popping up that people are claiming are AI-generated fakes are just staged.
	I don't really know or claim to be an expert on this stuff, but I try not to let atrocity photos drive my thinking.
	Or audio recordings, whether it's supposedly an audio recording of a JDAM missile, or whether it's an audio recording supposedly of Hamas terrorist phone calls.
	Debate over the long-running and the complicated Israel-Palestine-American relationship is kind of irrelevant here for us, he says.
	Whatever conclusion we reach here is going to have zero impact for the outcome in Gaza.
	However, if people get it into their heads that a, quote, decolonization struggle, unquote, is normal, that it is moral and morally acceptable in some situations, that is going to have a real negative impact on us here at home in America.
	You might have a very good debate club explanation of how the Israeli encroachment on Palestine is illegitimate and immoral, and that the Israelis are perpetrating an ethnic cleansing campaign.
	But that's neither here nor there compared to the impact of this raw footage.
	He said, American leftists are openly saying that they see you as the Israelis getting gunned down in the video.
	And they see themselves as the Hamas fighters who are pulling the trigger.
	It's not at all subtle.
	All of the freak show immigrant hordes that have been imported over the last few decades and other defectives are suddenly making their voices heard.
	They want to decolonize you too.
	Right? So when you look at the open borders, you look at the fact that Biden is bringing in people, bringing in people that we're at war with, people who deeply hate America because of our occupation and because of innocent people being killed, as always happens with an occupation and so forth, and because of our wars. These people have a visceral hatred for America.
	He's bringing them in by swarms.
	They are the colonists, but they're being taught by the leftists in the universities.
	That we are the colonists and we should be destroyed.
	Just as Rashida Tlaib is a Palestinian colonist who wants us destroyed.
	Many of the people saying this stuff have official positions or they have jobs with leftist activist organizations or have teaching positions in schools.
	The entire far-left activist class was endorsing and justifying terrorism this last couple of weeks.
	They're giving the game away here.
	It is currently impossible to conceal the fact that mainstream leftist organizations support indiscriminate ethnic violence against, quote-unquote, colonizers.
	And by that, they mean white people.
	In the minds of everyone involved, they are vindicating what the right has been saying for years.
	And so there's no need to interrupt your enemies when they're making a mistake.
	This is not our fight.
	you Only sober and realistic leadership is going to resolve this crisis.
	We don't have any sober, realistic leadership in Washington, do we?
	That's why there is no solution coming out of Washington for this or for anything else.
	Even if you oppose Hamas' actions, you don't need to be an Israeli shill or you don't have to join the IDF. Ron DeSantis has taken the ill-advised approach of attacking Trump, perhaps the most comically pro-Israeli president in history, for being insufficiently sycophantic towards Israel's incompetent and unreliable leadership.
	What you definitely should not do is to echo leftist reasoning behind the attacks.
	The leftists are claiming that the Israelis have stolen the land of the Palestinians and have subjected Palestinians to systemic discrimination and ethnic cleansing.
	Therefore, the Palestinians are justified in targeting civilian beneficiaries of this theft.
	So they say, you stole the land, and so now these people are justified to target civilian beneficiaries of what you say is theft.
	Whether or not this is true, whether or not it is theft, it is irrelevant, given the fact that leftists, right or wrong, say the exact same thing about you, American people.
	That Native Americans and black people in the USA today, you should not be making your case for them.
	This is not a logic that you want to endorse.
	Again, this is saying, you know, 100 years ago, 200 years ago, 400 years ago, whatever.
	Okay? You, your ancestors took this.
	And so now, even though we're at peace, we've had prosperity, we've built a system, we've built a system that is inclusive of everybody.
	Yes, it was. It's not now.
	Now we have an enemy.
	The enemy are the white people whose ancestors established this country.
	And this country must be destroyed.
	This is the rhetoric. This is the position of all the Marxists, all the leftists.
	And we should not be making the case for them to kill us.
	And there is no case for that.
	He goes on to say, Yellowstone is the most popular TV show in America, likely watched almost exclusively by people who are at least vaguely culturally conservative.
	Despite this fact, the show frequently pushes openly anti-white talking points and introduces absurd propaganda plot lines.
	One of the larger meta-themes of the show is the inevitable return of ill-gotten land from corrupt and hypocritical whites to the Native Americans.
	Later this week, the movie by Martin Scorsese, Killers of the Flower Moon, is premiering.
	And everybody is talking about it because it's a Scorsese film.
	The movie recounts a true story of the Asajj Indian murders in which a white crime family systematically assassinated dozens of Asajj Indians in an effort to gain access to immense fortune the tribe had obtained through newly discovered oil deposits on their Indian reservation.
	Although this is true story, the timing of this production is almost certainly intended to capitalize on the larger shift of focus and the foundational myths of our country.
	You understand that? The foundational myths of our country.
	It doesn't mean that it's not true.
	It means it's an epic story.
	And of course, with any epic story in any history, you're going to have untrue elements in it.
	With any human who does great things, you're also going to find that there are, you know, things in their personal life, even things in their public life that were evil, that were wrong.
	But, and of course, that is going to be true of their heroes as well.
	It'll be true of the Indians, it'll be true of the communists.
	You know, you had Indians who attacked and warred with each other and killed each other and took each other hostage and raped, you know, the members of the tribes who were not warriors and all this kind of stuff.
	This is every civilization.
	Every civilization. But we're supposed to believe, because this is what they're pushing now.
	We're supposed to believe that just like in Nazi Germany, oh, it's the Jews are behind everything that's evil.
	Now, it's the white man in America.
	People like simple stories with clear good guys and bad guys.
	Ultimately, they're trying to claim the wealth and the prosperity of modern America.
	And they're trying to claim it by saying that it was created through great evil.
	Therefore, its continued existence is illegitimate.
	Unless we turn it over to them in reparations or something, of course.
	This larger narrative is not true.
	It ignores critical context.
	The two-way conflicts between American settlers and Indian tribes, although there are many victims, nobody came away from these conflicts with their hands clean.
	This is a complicated issue that was almost entirely behind us, but now is being relitigated for cynical contemporary political purposes.
	They want total decolonization, which is to say they want ethnic cleansing.
	The only response to these arguments from leftists has to be a loud and clear no.
	This behavior will never be justified.
	You will never come up with a good reason to gun down unarmed civilians.
	If you do this sort of thing, you will get bombed.
	If you try to hide, then wherever you're hiding, you will bomb that too.
	You will have nowhere to escape.
	This behavior demands a response.
	There's no argument you can come up with to stop that response.
	But it is not our duty to do that.
	It's not our duty to inject us into every dispute everywhere.
	And, you know, just as we saw in Vietnam, and you had McNamara, who, you know, he was the whiz kid who ran this whole fiasco in Vietnam.
	He confessed at the end of his life.
	That, you know, when he went back to talk to the people in Vietnam, I said, what's the matter with you?
	Don't you know anything about this area?
	Don't you know anything about history?
	Well, no, they didn't. And they didn't care.
	That guy said, domino theory?
	You don't understand that the Vietnamese have been fighting the Chinese for centuries, for millennia?
	And you think that, you know, were there surrogates?
	Were there allies?
	And you're fighting China? You're fighting us by, you're ultimately fighting Chinese?
	You don't know anything. And Robert McNamara said, yeah, I guess he's right, you know.
	We interject ourselves into these conflicts in different countries.
	We don't know who the good guys are.
	We don't know who the bad guys are.
	And guess what? There may not be any good guys there.
	Why are we jumping into this?
	Well, we're jumping into it because the military industrial corporations demand it.
	Because the CIA demands it.
	Because we have political leaders and we have military leaders who want to sacrifice your life for the life of your children.
	And now they're at the point where I think they want to bring war to this country.
	Because they certainly have to understand that if we get involved in a much wider war, it's going to come to this country in many different ways.
	It'll come to this country in terms of economic disaster.
	If they ignite the Middle East, and of course we've got one place after the other, already you've got rocket attacks and missiles being launched, and the U.S. government is involved in those things on both sides already.
	Intellectualizing these issues ignores the serious real-world consequences of these fake debates.
	Americans are in for very hard times.
	There is no need to draw lines in the sand.
	Everybody should understand that you cannot come up with a good reason to attack innocent people.
	If you do those things, you're going to die.
	And so we need to understand that that is what's fundamentally here.
	But, you know, making this into a broader war is also a big part of the problem.
	Let me read some of the comments that are on here.
	On Rockfan, Angry Tiger says, My American-Palestinian friends believe that Hamas is basically a shell organization for Mossad, and they don't support them.
	Well, certainly we understand that Hamas was set up initially as a shell organization to push out the PLO. But, you know, here's how things actually work over a period of time.
	If you go back and you look at Manuel Noriega, he was somebody who worked with the CIA. And George H.W. Bush, when he was involved with CIA, you know, Manuel Noriega was there.
	He was their guy, and, you know, they helped to set him up in power.
	And he was pushing drugs with him because they're drug pushers, the CIA drug pushers.
	Eventually, my reading of that situation, there's a lot of evidence to support it, is that Noriega decided he's going to do it on his own.
	And so he set up these different puppets, whether it's Noriega or whether it's maybe perhaps Hamas.
	These people decide, well, I'm going to have my own crime family here.
	I don't have to work for the CIA or I don't have to work for Mossad.
	You know, that's what the whole thing in Panama was really about.
	On Rockfin, Angus Mustang said, replying to Angry Tiger, says, well, as we know, Hamas was started by Israel.
	I don't doubt it. On Rockfin, Risha M. says, yes, Angry Tiger came with my friends from, same with my friends from Palestine.
	On Rumble, narrow way, narrow gate.
	Glad to see we got somebody back on Rumble again.
	A couple of people here. Says, Zionist Israel created Hamas back in 1987 to counter other Ishmaelite groups and quell their actions.
	They fund them. They arm them.
	On Rumble, Hazel Kitty 57, I say to Christian Zionists, you realize they're Christian Palestinians.
	That's right. In one ear and out the other.
	As Chuck Baldwin said, he's been there, he's preached at Christian churches there, and he said they were overwhelmingly Palestinian in that area.
	But again, when we go back to this, I just want to underscore that we've got to be careful about this whole colonizer narrative that is out there.
	Understand what these people are doing.
	Understand that it will be used To justify terrorism and ethnic cleansing here in our country.
	I don't want to get involved in a foreign war in any way, shape, or form.
	But I also don't want to see these Marxist tactics being brought here.
	And if we justify...
	There's no justification for terrorist attacks, ever.
	And if we try to justify that, we'll be justifying terrorism attacks against us as well.
	It goes on to say...
	The reason leftists win civil conflicts isn't that they're particularly competent, or even that they have overwhelming numbers, but rather that those who could and normally would oppose them simply refuse to oppose them and passively accept their fates.
	And he gave an example in the Russian Civil War.
	He said this is definitely the case during the Russian Civil War, when the Bolsheviks had very low support, but the general public and even the military had been turned against the The quote-unquote reactionary counter-revolutionaries.
	It was the media and it was decades of liberal cultural programming.
	You know, when I look at that, I see that today even in West Point.
	Even in West Point. Liberal cultural programming.
	In the early war, the Bolsheviks attacked the city of Rostov that housed about 8,000 refugee right-wing soldiers and officers.
	The men had come from all over the country, fleeing certain death at the hands of the Bolsheviks.
	They took shelter with the vaguely right-wing and autonomous Cossack government.
	Despite this advantage of manpower and general opposition to the Bolsheviks, only a few dozen refugees could be convinced to actually join the brand-new white army to fight against the threat.
	The local government threw up its hands and collapsed rather than take any steps to preserve itself.
	Kaladin, the leader of the local Cossacks, shot himself in disgust after seeing the total passivity of the people that he loved.
	You see, this is where we are right now.
	We're getting very close to that point.
	Because of the massive influence in the educational institutions, especially the universities, the media, including news and entertainment, We have been taught to hate America, everything that America is about.
	And we see the younger generation is essentially defenseless against our Bolsheviks.
	They're ready to just surrender because they hate America even more than they hate the Marxists that are taking over America.
	The fight was not an impossible one.
	Even the greatly outnumbered white forces, mostly teenage students from military academies, managed to inflict catastrophic casualties on the poorly disciplined and trained Red Army.
	However, there's only so much you can do when you're outnumbered 50 to 1.
	The public in Rostov had become intellectually disarmed by rhetoric about the inevitability of regime change in Russia and And having accepted that initial premise, they found themselves helpless while it was time limit was set on how far that change would go.
	There weren't any limits on it.
	Even if they didn't support those attacking them, they could always find a new excuse to do nothing in response.
	So, in conclusion, when you're looking at the Gaza situation, you shouldn't be pro-Israel, you shouldn't support American intervention, but you should definitely be anti-colonization.
	Decolonization is not inevitable, and it is something that must be actively opposed.
	It is something that will be used to destroy our country.
	And I'm not the only one who notices this, and neither is that.
	The conundrum substack, Peachy Keenan, says, decolonize this.
	Now it's everywhere. It's at every Hamas victory parade.
	They call themselves pro-Palestine rallies.
	It's on every sign.
	He says a professor at Stanford decided to play a guess the colonizer game for his students.
	And they went around separating students in the classes as to whether they were a colonizer or whether they were colonized, depending on where they said they were from.
	And so he says, I can't help it, when I hear the word colonize, I keep remembering that I'm overdue for a colonoscopy.
	But anyway, he says, a white supremacist is over.
	The new and the more correct term for you just dropped.
	Colonizer. Synonym, subtler.
	He says, so now let's do some colonizer math.
	Here's how to find out if you are a colonizer or a colonizee.
	Number one, figure out where you're really from and how many years ago you or your ancestors left that place.
	Number two, multiply that number by how racist you are.
	Number three, divide that by the number of BLM flags on your front lawn.
	Multiply by the number of times you voted for Trump.
	Do you own a kefaya?
	Yes or no? If five is no, then you are a colonizer.
	I don't even know what that is.
	I may not even be pronouncing it right.
	I'll look that up, Travis.
	I should have looked it up. K-E-F-F-I-Y-E-H. Anyway, he says there's a lot of new American colonists, and they live in very tight-knit, closed colonies, like Dearborn, Michigan, or Hamtramck, or Detroit, or Minnesota, or Detroit, or...
	Los Angeles, Chicago, New York, and at every university.
	They don't wear cute tri-corner hats.
	They don't have buckles on their shoes, but you can pick the colonists out easily.
	They're the ones tearing down signs with photos of Israeli hostages and sending their daughters to these clinics in Michigan.
	I'm happy to declare that the original colonizers around here were Formerly known as patriotic Americans, have now become the colonized.
	So there we go. We're no longer a threat.
	You don't have to kill us, as Biden was saying.
	People like me, we're going to make sure you're less than even half the people here.
	It turns out that your soft underbelly was your dumb faith and meritocracy, your colorblind justice in one country under God, sucker.
	Many, and he says, my evil settler ancestors started colonizing this place in the early 20th century.
	And so now they're being colonized in the other direction.
	And while we're talking about colonizers, one of the leaders of the colonizers is RFK Jr.
	Why do I say this?
	Well, because after speaking out against the Supreme Court decision...
	Saying you're not going to use discrimination, racial discrimination, other things like that, for admissions into colleges.
	Because, you know, of course, that doesn't mean that you can't still get in if you're white and a Kennedy, right?
	Your position at Harvard is reserved already.
	But this little Marxist colonizer, Robert Kennedy Jr., has now come out in favor of reparations.
	Reparations is the key decolonizer thing, isn't it?
	It's absolutely amazing to me that he would come out in favor of that, that he would come out in favor of discrimination and college admissions and all the rest of the stuff.
	But that is where the guy is.
	So let me finish up and take a break here.
	I want you to hear a statement from a guy who used to be part of Hezbollah.
	And the question is, you know, how do we stop this cycle of hate?
	Because that really is what is happening.
	It is an ongoing cycle of hate.
	And this guy left Hezbollah because he realized God did not design us to hate.
	And so how do we get things changed?
	Well, listen to his personal experience.
	You were born in Iran.
	Correct. You were a Hezbollah fighter for three years.
	Correct. I was on my way to the United States to convert Christians into Islam.
	And I had 30 illegal passports at that time.
	I was arrested, put in jail in Malaysia.
	I was a dedicated Muslim.
	Not only prayed the prayers, but I read the Quran once every ten days, cover to cover.
	So I was very dedicated.
	In my time in jail, one day as I'm praying, a man appears in front of me, normal size, but his being shines like light.
	And this light was not a normal light.
	This light carried identity in earth.
	You knew that he is holy and he is just.
	And instantaneous I knew I am not.
	Even though I had prayed so many prayers, even though I had fasted so much and I had read the Quran, And I had volunteered to walk on landmines or I had participated in hanging people trying to please Allah.
	I knew, even though I have kept all the rules and regulation of Islam, I knew I'm not just and I'm not holy.
	And I knew the only just thing for him to do is to kill me.
	But I didn't want to die.
	So I ran to the corner of the room, literally held my head in my arms and just cried out shouting, forgive me, forgive me, forgive me.
	And I didn't think he will forgive me because he is just.
	And I felt a touch on my left shoulder.
	And he said, I forgive you.
	And I felt a weight just lifted off me.
	And I knew I'm forgiven, but I don't know how.
	And I was confused.
	I was like, okay, I don't understand.
	Only God can forgive you.
	You just forgive me. You are God.
	But you are a different God than the one I have studied about.
	This is not Allah.
	So who are you that forgives me and I feel forgiven today?
	And he says, I am the way, the truth, and the life.
	And I thought that's very powerful.
	It means a lot because as a Muslim you pray, show me there is a straight path kind of thing.
	And so the way is a direction.
	Truth is something you measure.
	Life is a source.
	But he claims to be all those three.
	I never thought the way is a person.
	The truth is a person.
	And life is a person and all of them is the same person.
	So I said, I don't understand.
	What is your name?
	I said, Jesus Christ.
	And someone grabbed all my bones out of my body.
	it just fell like a piece of meat to the ground and I just began to weep What changed after that?
	It's like you're not being color blight.
	And then suddenly you see colors again.
	And you realize the world is so much more beautiful than you ever thought.
	If you ask me what made the world so colorless, it's the hatred, the anger that is in the heart of every Muslim.
	I mean, I hear people say, why did you hate the Jews?
	I had never met a Jew.
	And I thought Hitler was a good man for doing what he did.
	He just didn't finish the job.
	I don't know why I hated them.
	No Jew had ever done anything bad to me.
	God didn't design us to hate.
	Didn't design us to want to see someone dead.
	He did not design us for these things.
	These are design of Satan.
	Yeah, and he now has a ministry called Cyrus's Call.
	To promote friendship between Persians and Jews, you know, from Iran.
	And we forget, you know, Iran is Persia.
	And, you know, you had the Persians, the Babylonians, you had the Medes.
	The Medes are now spread out between these different ones because after, you know, one of the world wars, they had the British Empire come in and just split these nations up kind of arbitrarily.
	And one of the things that they did, perhaps deliberately, is to create jurisdictions, borders, political nations that had competing ethnic groups in there.
	So, you know, the Kurds are the kind of the ancient Medes and the Iranians, the Persians, and the Iraqis, the Babylonians that we have known from history.
	But, you know, it's interesting as I see that...
	I have heard so many different stories of people who were living in a Muslim country that had no access to a Bible.
	And it's amazing how many of them are converted by dreams and visions.
	Truly is amazing.
	We'll be right back.
	��
	��
	Analyzing the globalist's next move.
	�� And now, The David Nutt Show.
	Let me respond to some people who sent me some emails and some cards.
	First of all, thank you, Jeff and your wife.
	Very kind what you've done to support us and very kind what you said.
	It says, the world doesn't want to hear it, but we're commanded to share the good news.
	And that's the truth. That's the truth.
	So, thank you.
	He says, we ought to, quotes 3 John, he says, we ought to support this so we may be fellow workers with the truth.
	Thank you. And Gregory, I got your message here.
	Glad to see what's going to happen on this Sunday.
	So, praise God about that.
	You know when we talk about it, I'll just say one last thing here.
	When we talk about what is coming, I've been saying this for a long time.
	This isn't something I've recently come to.
	I knew that when I got purged back in 2018, I... Google got rid of everything about me right away, except for one thing.
	And that was my interviews with Simon Roche, the people who were resisting this race war that had been created by the Marxists in South Africa.
	And I believe they left that up.
	It wasn't that it had a lot of views.
	It only had about 50,000 views.
	But they put that up and all the other views, all of the other things that I had that had 10 times that amount, disappeared.
	And I always believe that Google did that because they wanted to portray me as some kind of a white supremacist or something.
	It's right. Whatever is right is right.
	It doesn't matter what the skin color of the people are.
	And... So I looked to see if they still had that.
	Because I couldn't remember Simon's name.
	And so I looked to see that.
	He's with the Sudlanders.
	These are people who have been in South Africa for about 400 years.
	Just like a lot of Americans' families have been here for 400 years.
	And, you know, they were at peace with the Zulus.
	The Zulus don't like the Marxists either.
	And the Zulus sided with them.
	It's the Marxists who do this type of thing.
	And Simon Roche had joined the ANC because he was against apartheid.
	And then he saw what the communists were about after they won.
	And so I've had him on several times.
	And this time, I didn't see anything on Google, except for this.
	They had, one of the times I had him on, in 2018, they saved this on a site called Angry White Men.
	Angrywhitemen.com.
	They say that they track white supremacy.
	You see? I'm an angry white man, and...
	They track me as a white supremacist.
	And the headline is, David Knight, colon, people calling for the murder of whites is going to follow if the universities continue their current trajectory.
	I said this five years ago.
	I believed it then.
	We can see it now.
	Think even more clearly, can't we?
	Said Knight mentioned that Julius Malema, the head of South Africa's Economic Freedom Fighters Party.
	Yeah, you call yourself Freedom Fighters.
	These are radical Marxists.
	They have an apartheid-era song called Shoot the Boar, Shoot the White Man.
	And, you know, that's not...
	You know, we don't have angry black Marxists.
	No, we got angry white men who say, that's wrong.
	So... As I pointed out, you know, we're talking about it.
	He said, yeah, he's made it very clear he wants to kill white people and people with him there jumping up and down, kill the white man, kill the boar.
	And at the time, we were talking about the fact that, and this is early on, it was a conservative Christian university.
	It was a Calvinist university or something.
	I guess was the name of it.
	And they had people there that the newly elected chairman of their student council declared that whites are no longer welcome at that university.
	And we've seen this trend going on.
	Quite frankly, this interview has aged really well.
	And they quoted me by saying, I said this.
	I said, the thing is, they said, Knight offered this warning to his audience five years ago.
	When you're talking about saying whites are not welcome at that Calvinist university, that doesn't sound that much different from what we're seeing in the United States right now.
	You don't have anybody holding rallies and saying kill the white.
	That was, by the way, that Calvinist university was in South Africa.
	You don't have anybody holding rallies and saying kill the white man, bring me my machine gun, which is what their lyrics are.
	But I said that's going to follow if we continue this.
	And we have seen this gets worse every 10-15 years because this is the educational system.
	The hatred that is being instilled in the American education system.
	Yeah, I stand by that.
	I stand by that. And so let me just summarize what I just said there.
	I do think the Marxist ANC in South Africa is an example.
	And I have said from the very beginning, and this is still a high certainty.
	I mean, I can't say I'm not 100% certain of anything, but I have a high certainty that this was a stand-down like Pearl Harbor, just like FDR did.
	And I said from the very beginning that people opposing this are the Marxists and the terrorists of our country.
	People who are excusing this and saying anything is any act of terror against civilians.
	Is fine if you can make a colonization argument.
	And we've already seen this.
	They've already burned down our neighborhoods.
	They've already torn down statues of honorable people who led this country, who built this country.
	And they'll burn down your neighborhood and kill you if we continue to go down this path.
	Because we're rapidly escalating towards this fourth turning in the next few years.
	We should never accept injustice.
	But there are acceptable and unacceptable ways to respond.
	And I say this not because there's anybody in Washington or any political party that's listening to me or cares what I think.
	They don't care what I think. They don't care what you think either.
	But God knows what you think.
	And God cares what you do.
	And how you live your life.
	And so regardless of what happens around us, if our country is burning down or there's riots or the rest of this stuff, if you disregard God's law, There'll be consequences for you.
	And you will lose the greatest battle in this life.
	That is our battle.
	Are we going to follow God?
	Are we going to follow what we want to do?
	And I have to say, even if you're an atheist, it's a really bad strategy.
	Because if you lash out with terror and with violence, you're going to lose public opinion.
	Because in most people, that part of their conscience has not yet been seared.
	And so you start lashing out at innocent people and murdering them as Hamas did.
	And as these people in the universities want to justify, as I said, they don't even have the decency to deny that that happened.
	They're like Madeleine Albright.
	Yeah, fine. It was worth it.
	It was worth it. That's what they're saying.
	So if you embrace that as part of your political argument, you're going to not only lose public opinion, but the government is going to be justified in locking you up.
	So we don't want to do that.
	Just to repeat, the way of Christ is determined, it is relentless, it is fearless opposition to what is wrong, to injustice, to murder.
	That is the way of victory.
	And sometimes we even win in this life.
	Don't expect that you're going to win in this life.
	Don't expect that maybe you might even be killed for standing for those things.
	But, you know, as we saw Biden, he said, well, our team didn't bomb the hospital.
	Well, don't join either one of these teams.
	Don't play their evil game.
	Don't be a pawn of Satan.
	You want to be on God's team.
	We'll take a quick break and we're going to shift gears and we're going to talk about car wars.
	stay with us we'll be right back so so so so so so so so so
	so so you're
	listening to the David Knight Show.
	Wow.
	Well, and I'll just say one last thing.
	CivilDefenseManual.com.
	Two volumes. Great advice on defending yourself, defending your family, defending your community, making a community.
	We all should be looking at making communities now.
	Understand, you know, Washington's not on your side.
	They're doing everything they can to get you involved in a world war.
	So what are you going to do if that happens?
	What are you going to do if they come for you, the colonizer?
	Well, just make sure that you have other colonizers, other settlers who can circle the wagons defensively and make sure that you can feed yourself, that you can get water, that you take some good practical advice.
	You'll find a lot of that in CivilDefenseManual.com.
	He only sells it in a physical format because in a lot of these scenarios, you're not going to have power.
	You're not going to have internet. So I highly recommend CivilDefenseManual.com.
	A Tesla owner says that his heart missed a beat when he received a $21,000 bill after the battery was destroyed by rain.
	Flabbergasted when he and his partner got this bill, $21,000.
	And so when we look at this, it's not just that.
	The Rivian had a fender bender, $40,000 for a fender bender.
	And so he called him up and he said, you know, it's not covered under warranty, they said.
	And so he says, okay, well, how much is this going to be?
	He thought it was going to be maybe a couple thousand dollars or something.
	No, it was $26,000 to get a replacement battery.
	I'm sorry, his was $21,000.
	Somebody else had this happen in Canada.
	And it was $26,000.
	But... What do we do to keep them from banning everything that we have?
	You know, even to the extent as they're burning down our economy, burning down our ability to even have private vehicles, they don't want you to have electric vehicles.
	They've been clear about this.
	You know, Eric Peters and I have been talking about this for a very long time.
	They only want electric vehicles.
	It's just like the pandemic MacGuffin.
	No, you can't have ivermectin.
	You can't have hydroxychloroquine.
	You've got to have that one thing that we're preparing for you.
	And the one thing they've been preparing for is can't have any other alternatives, can't have hydrogen, can't have gasoline.
	We're not going to work on any of those technologies or any of those distribution channels.
	No, you have to get all of your mobility from that electrical grid.
	And we said, and of course now, you know, they're going to shut down the electric grid.
	That's now started with EPA saying, well, the emissions are too bad from these different power plants.
	We used to joke about that.
	We said, well, okay.
	So what about the emissions from the power plants?
	Because they don't have sufficient capacity for their solar and wind.
	You know, and what has to go into making the solar and wind and on and on.
	I mean, you can keep pushing this thing back.
	It's like, oh, okay, well, maybe would they be happy if we just, you know, put some kind of a large balloon or something on our tailpipe?
	and collect all of the emissions that come out of that And then periodically we drive to the power plant facility as if it was some kind of a dump and we disconnect that and release the gases there.
	Is that okay? Because that's really what's happening in India and China and the rest of these places.
	That's what's happening there. But no, the plan is to completely burn everything down.
	And now they're looking at this and saying, well, you know, you can't have cars in the cities because you just need too many parking places.
	And now they're saying car parking spaces will have to be even bigger because we've got to space everybody out because of the electric car fires.
	This is what they're actually pushing in the UK at The Telegraph.
	Ministers have been told that battery-powered vehicles pose a medley of risks in indoor car parks.
	Yeah. Which could render 1960s-era fire safety laws dangerously out of date.
	Well, that's interesting, you know.
	And when you look at it, it's one of the big questions about 9-11.
	Why didn't they ever change the firefighting rules or the building code or any of that kind of stuff after 9-11?
	They haven't changed that stuff.
	They still have the same way to fight fires if it's a high-rise skyscraper, and they still allow them to build buildings the same way.
	But now they're going to have to change the car parks because that is a real risk that is there.
	And we've seen this happening with the electric scooters burning down so many apartment buildings in New York and has killed several people in those fires as well.
	Areas of concern addressed in the government-commissioned report include explosions of flammable vapor clouds emitted by electric vehicle batteries as well as jets of fire and toxic water runoff from fighting the fires.
	The report said indoor and multi-story car parks should adopt larger parking bays to help firefighters reach burning vehicles, with one example in a report proposing a 90-centimeter to 1.2-meter gap between vehicles.
	Maybe it'd be better if we just keep what works.
	But of course, they're going to say, well, we've got to have new codes, and you've got to have a lot of space around all these cars because they're going to spontaneously combust, right?
	Why don't we have cars that don't do that?
	And then they will use that as justification and say, well, we just don't have the space for you to have cars.
	We're not going to allow you to have gasoline or diesel cars, and we're going to have to, if you've got electric cars, you've got to put more space around there.
	Besides, we don't have that much power left on the grid anymore after we shut down the functional power plants, so you can't have any kind of private car.
	That's where this is all going, and that's where this has been going for quite some time.
	Fires in indoor car parks can cause widespread damage to To other vehicles, the Luton Airport car park blaze that we talked about last week and shut down the airport, saw pictures of it spontaneously combusting.
	The first one of those that we've seen in a car park.
	So they said this is estimated to have destroyed up to 1,500 cars.
	They're saying that was not caused by an electric vehicle.
	Do you believe that?
	How many times have we seen spontaneous explosions?
	They said they feared that battery fires could cause a volcano in these garages.
	The report published in July goes on to detail how water used to put out burning electric cars Then becomes contaminated by toxic chemicals and lithium-ion batteries, and it can pose a significant ecological impact in some areas.
	Well, you know, the electric car battery industry has a significant environmental impact, and the Democratic Republic of Congo, for example, you know, we have slave labor, young children digging with crude implements or their hands to get this stuff out of the ground.
	We've got a new Stockholm Syndrome example here.
	The city of Stockholm, Sweden, is going to ban gas and diesel cars completely, starting in 2025.
	The Swedish capital now has a plan in place to ban gas and diesel cars.
	2025, the ban is going to begin in a 20-block area around the capital's finance hub.
	Same thing Sadiq Khan is doing, right?
	We have these ultra-low emission zones, and we just keep expanding it.
	See, how is it that Fauci put it?
	We do it with disruption, we do it from the inside, and we do it iteratively.
	And you see these car banning areas expanding like a metastasizing cancer.
	Okay, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	I want to take a look at what is happening with abortion, especially in politics.
	It gives us an idea of where our politicians really are.
	Music In
	a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	Well, LifeSite News asks, why is Governor Youngkin of Virginia, the guy who is now a lot of Republican people, saying, well, none of these other people are going to be able to stand against Trump, so let's coalesce around Youngkin.
	Really? Why is he wasting $1.4 million to assure voters that he supports 97% of abortions?
	And, of course, you can see, scroll down a little bit, Travis, you can see that ad campaign he's got there.
	Happy Family and Virginia Republicans support a reasonable 15-week limit because, you know, anything else would just be too harsh.
	Here's your supposed alternative to Trump's too harsh stuff.
	Why is it that these people always talk about planned parenthood?
	Why do they always show pictures of the family when they're talking about people killing their children?
	What a cynical thing.
	Governor Yunkin had a successful career as an investor, so it's a bit puzzling why he would pour $1.4 million into an ad that told voters he opposes a ban on abortions that he essentially wants to protect only 3% of babies from being killed in the womb.
	And they point out that if you look at Virginia's 2020 abortion data, It shows that about 0.6% of abortions occurred between 14 and 15 weeks.
	About the same number between 16 and 17 weeks.
	Another 0.9% were performed between 18 and 20 weeks of gestation.
	And 108 abortions, 0.7%, occurred at 21 weeks of gestation later.
	So the vast majority of abortions are already committed.
	When the baby is still in the first trimester of pregnancy, and none of those would be stopped under an exception-filled 15-week abortion ban.
	Ironically, Youngkin's ad features audio of a baby's heartbeat in utero, as it claims Republicans merely support common-sense positions on prenatal murder.
	That common sense position would allow the destruction of babies well after their heartbeats become detectable around six weeks of pregnancy.
	You know, these reasonable limits, this is something that's coming from the establishment GOP. Youngkin is establishment GOP. Trump is establishment GOP. So is Nikki Haley on all of these issues.
	They're all very closely aligned.
	Somehow now, 15 weeks has become the magic number for the Republican establishment.
	Anything else is too harsh.
	LifeSite News said Youngkin should remember what he said in his speech.
	He should apply it to abortion.
	He said, at times we've failed to live up to our ideals, but we all want to do what is right and what is morally just, even if we fall short.
	Well, what is right and what is morally just is to not be Democrats' light on abortion, but to protect all human beings from destruction in the womb.
	And I agree with that.
	But it's interesting to watch these politicians.
	And we find out these politicians have positions, and they have postures, but they don't have principles, do they?
	That's why they're so malleable and ever-changing.
	And one of the best examples of these posturing, changing chameleons is Carrie Lake.
	Carrie Lake is somebody who has, by all accounts in her personal life, She was a liberal Democrat like Donald Trump, and now she wants to be like Donald Trump, and she wants to be this combative MAGA person.
	And like Donald Trump, she says that the majority of people want abortion to be legal.
	Echoing the current stance of her close ally, Trump reported advice from establishment Republican politicos on avoiding the perceived political challenges of a strong pro-life stance.
	This former news anchor, who wants to be just another one of these celebrity politicians, doesn't want to show the truth about abortion.
	It's really not very hard to convince people that this is inhumane, cruel murder.
	You just show them the pictures of what's going on.
	This is why they freak out when anybody shows them the truth about what this really is about.
	Show them the pictures of abortion.
	That's all you have to do, but these people won't do that.
	So do you get the picture on them?
	Do you understand what they're about?
	You know, we had, of course, this week, Britney Spears, whose life is a mess.
	We should pity these celebrities, especially ones who are child stars, like Britney Spears.
	The way it messes with them, messes with their head.
	You know, the fame, the fortune, the adoring crowds, and then this insecurity that they're going to lose all of that.
	The ready availability of sex and drugs to all these people, it just destroys them.
	Just amazing. Yeah, don't ever envy these people.
	They should be pitied. Britney Spears reportedly aborted her unborn child while dating actor and singer Justin Timberlake decades ago.
	She said this decision is one of the most agonizing things I have ever experienced, she said.
	She's now 41.
	You know, it's kind of interesting, isn't it, how...
	Um, these kids, and I remember, um, when it came out, we had a relative who's, who was so into Disney.
	Uh, they go to Disney all the time, get all the Disney merchandise and, you know, let the kids watch, um, all the Disney stuff and everything.
	And then, you know, we had Hannah Montana who turned into Miley Cyrus.
	Um, and then, uh, I think Christina Aguilera had some Disney thing, and Britney Spears had some Disney thing.
	I just looked at it, and I thought, no, there's just something wrong about that.
	And of course, these were really kind of targeted towards girls, but we didn't ever get into any of that stuff with our sons.
	And then as time started to go by...
	You see them taking down this path of just wanton sexuality.
	So look at that.
	They start them out with the little girls watching them, and they transition them from these innocent child stars into these rabid, debauched sex symbols to carry the little kids along with them.
	So it's a very deliberate thing.
	Long before...
	Any of this other stuff happened with LGBT grooming and opposing parental rights and all the rest of the stuff.
	It's pretty clear that Disney was an evil groomer.
	They were not grooming kids for transgenderism, but they were grooming them for sexual depravity with these girl stars.
	Just grow up with them and grow to become like them as their role models.
	She wrote in her book, I loved Justin so much, I always expected us to have a family together one day.
	This would just be so much earlier than I had anticipated, she said, when she found out she was pregnant.
	She said Justin Timberlake definitely wasn't happy about the pregnancy and told her that they weren't ready to have a baby since they were way too young.
	Maybe they were way too young to engage in the behavior that got her pregnant.
	Justin was so sure that he didn't want to be a father, she said.
	She said she got an abortion, something she claimed she never would have done, quote-unquote, if the decision had been left up to me alone.
	To this day, it's one of the most agonizing things I have ever experienced in my life.
	Now, some of the people who know her work, believe it or not, I've never heard anything she's done.
	I've never heard Taylor Swift have managed so far, as far as I'm aware, to completely avoid any of that stuff.
	And so I'm not interested in it.
	But social media users who listen to what she wrote and said that they wondered whether or not a song from 2003, Which I guess would have been about that time.
	Did they say when that relationship was?
	I don't follow them that much.
	Yeah, 1999 to 2002 was when their relationship lasted.
	And then in 2003, she released a song called Every Time.
	And they believe that that might have been a reference to her aborted baby.
	Because they said the song has the lyrics, I guess I need you, baby.
	And every time I see you in my dreams, I see your face.
	It is haunting me. Please forgive me.
	My weakness caused you pain.
	And this song's my sorry, she said.
	And they said the music video showed her standing in a hospital room as a woman welcomes a newborn baby.
	So, please forgive me, baby.
	Every time in my dreams I see your face haunting me.
	My weakness caused you pain.
	And she says that's coming from a woman who is standing in a hospital where somebody else is welcoming a newborn baby.
	And she is also shown being rushed into an ambulance as the music video nears its clothes.
	Yeah, well, the sad thing is, is that, you know, we talk about this and A lot of people have made bad decisions.
	We all make bad decisions about a lot of things in our lives.
	And just as you heard earlier, you know, that guy, the Iranian guy, who says, I know I didn't deserve it.
	But there is forgiveness.
	You can never undo it, right?
	You can never do enough good to undo the bad.
	People who believe that, like Michael Bloomberg, again, oh yeah, I know, definitely says, if there is a God, I'm going straight into heaven, because look at all the money that I give for good causes, causes that I like.
	He thinks he can buy his way into heaven.
	And there's a lot of people who think that they have to buy their way or can buy their way into heaven with good works.
	No, that's why Christ came, and there is forgiveness in that, the wrongs that we have done, and the wrongs that have been done to us.
	We leave them there at the cross.
	But as we talk about this abortion thing, in Ohio, of course, there's a big fight going on.
	People don't want to show the truth, and so there's a different agenda that they're voting on.
	They don't want to get serious and show campaign videos of what happens.
	Why don't the people there, the Republicans or the pro-life people, why don't they just show the procedure cartoon to people?
	I mean, it's just...
	But they don't. Anyway, so you've got a guy who is a very well-known, very notorious partial birth abortion pioneer, Martin Haskell.
	He's put up $100,000 behind an effort to put a quote-unquote right to abortion in the Ohio Constitution.
	This change that they're going to be voting on was drafted by the Ohio chapter of the ACLU, backed by Ohio physicians for reproductive rights, and backed by this $100,000 from the guy who has Profited immensely.
	This is a very small contribution based on the amount of money that he's made.
	Because, as he says, he gave $100,000 to the campaign supporting issue number one.
	He said, because he knows, said one person, because he knows it's an investment in his late-term abortion practice.
	In 1996, he admitted to Congress that he routinely committed abortions, late-term abortions, at 20 to 24 weeks.
	undermining the common abortion industry claim that late term abortions are rare.
	That was in 1996. They were having congressional hearings in 1996.
	And as I said before, I ran for Congress in 1996.
	And I was involved in a PBS debate and some other things like that, and people were asking me about it.
	And initially, my response was, I was a libertarian.
	My response was, basically, I don't want government telling me what to do.
	And I didn't take that position.
	And it was something that had never been an issue for me or for Karen, and never had stopped to think about it.
	But this whole partial birth abortion thing came up during that campaign in 1996.
	And always, you know, this argument that came around, we were still in college.
	It was just before we met that this Roe v.
	Wade thing came out. And, you know, even the Christians that I knew, for the most part, it's like, well, it's not a human being and so forth and so on.
	Because we were ignorant about it.
	We hadn't seen the ultrasounds or anything.
	They didn't have that kind of technology.
	And we just went with the decision that they had.
	And it's like, you know, who gets to decide this thing?
	And then they came up with this partial birth abortion.
	Well, if the baby is born and you got, you know, one foot still inside the mother, you can kill the baby and we'll call that a partial birth abortion.
	Because they were debating that stuff.
	And they were defending that. And this was one of the guys who was defending it.
	Now giving $100,000 to enshrine abortion into the Ohio State Constitution.
	And he was instrumental in making me anti-abortion.
	Because when I saw that, I said all this stuff about it not being a human being.
	I said, that's simply a lie.
	This is simply partial birth abortion is infanticide.
	And now we have seen that people like Ralph Northam in Virginia, Kermit Gosnell, you know, the baby survives the abortion.
	Well, we're going to set the baby over to the side and just let them die because, you know, just as they did in ancient Rome, and we'll call it comfort care.
	So they have flown their flag, and we understand what they're about.
	Now, the World Economic Forum is pushing very heavily to push these abortion pills and other things as part of ER visits.
	Always on the side of evil.
	Always on the side of Satan.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, let's talk a little bit about what's going on with the economy and with money.
	We will be right back.
	Stay with us. You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, as we look at what is happening with money and financial issues, again, regardless of what happens with war, regardless of what happens with the price of oil and energy, as we see it spiking, as we had some engagements with the U.S. military in the Middle East yesterday that shot oil up, still go back to understand that the United Nations has formally launched their digital ID governance framework, as I pointed out yesterday.
	It is still CBDC. It is still this controlling and watching everything that you do, whether or not you are allowed to purchase anything.
	And as I point out, it's an integral part of Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals.
	In other words, they're going to use in the same way that they use the fake pandemic MacGuffin to push their vaccine passport forward.
	Permission to travel and your identification, that type of thing.
	They will use the climate change stuff, the sustainable development goals.
	They will use that to push the CBDC ID and controls.
	And it is going to be a core part of that.
	And that is going to be their central focus.
	It's going to be the thing that we have to fight against, frankly.
	And... Everything that they're rolling out is focusing us in that direction.
	And so again, as I've said before, go to the David Knight Show.
	Sorry, go to davidknight.gold.
	I say it so much. davidknight.gold.
	That'll take you to Tony Ardaman.
	You need to make making preparations.
	Just as I said before, a civil defense manual will make some financial preparations so that you can be able to exist outside of their complete control grid.
	One person asked me the other day, what about taxes?
	What about these other things? Well, any interaction that you have with the government, of course, they're going to control what they accept as payment.
	But you don't want them to be able to control what you are doing in terms of other things that you would be able to buy on a black or a gray market.
	And that's the key reason why you want to have something that is outside of their control.
	As I pointed out yesterday, the federal government's got about $5 billion in Bitcoin, one of the biggest holders of Bitcoin out there.
	And they have declared their undying opposition to Bitcoin and all crypto.
	Because it is competition to the CBDC. So it makes it easier for them, you know, even if they manipulate the price of gold, still the physical gold is going to be manipulated in terms of the dollar thing.
	But they can really wreak havoc, I think, on cyber stuff.
	So I'm definitely focused on gold and silver.
	Again, Tony Arterman can help you with anything.
	Size gold or silver purchase.
	And he can help you set up a savings program.
	He can help you set up an IRA that is focused with gold and silver.
	All those things he can help you with.
	And great program where you can set it up on a regular basis.
	Wolfpack there at wisewolf.gold.
	David Knight.gold will take you there.
	Elon Musk just warned about the credit card debt, about commercial real estate and foreign conflict.
	So he sees the obvious issues of war.
	But also what is happening with commercial real estate.
	It's kind of interesting, you know, Gerald Salenti has been talking about this for about five years.
	The commercial real estate thing.
	Even going, well I say, go back to 2019.
	We started seeing this repo market stuff.
	But then especially when it locked everybody down.
	And so that was in 2020.
	Now here, three years later, Elon Musk is talking about that.
	Yeah, Gerald Salenti, take a look at TrendsJournal.com.
	Always ahead of the curve on this stuff, and folks will give you a 10% off if you use the code KNIGHT there.
	But Elon Musk says, credit card costs have surged to extremely punishing levels.
	If you can't pay them off and you're still accruing interest at 20%, you're headed to a bad place.
	Why do we call this usury, as we used to?
	Why do we call these credit card companies loan sharks?
	You know, why do we just accept the fact they're going to charge us 20, 30, 40% interest, some of them?
	Why do we give them the power to do this?
	And, of course, they were charging us 20% interest when they were getting 0% loans from the government.
	It's just criminal what is happening with that.
	He says, people are reading about war all over the world.
	He said, buying a new car tends to not be on people's front of mind.
	And so he's giving guidance about how their sales may be declining, he said.
	But when we talk about war being on the front of people's minds, it certainly is on the front of Netanyahu.
	As Michael Tracy tweeted out, he said, Netanyahu's just proclaimed an axis of evil.
	Which would seem to indicate that Israel is preparing for a war not just against Hamas but against Iran and expects the USA and Europe to join in this quote-unquote battle of civilization.
	Yeah, just nuke everybody, right?
	And he's using the same George W. Bush rhetoric because he's been using that same George W. Bush rhetoric all along.
	We've had David Petraeus.
	Former general, former CIA chief, said, you know, if Israel goes in to clean out Gaza, he said, this is going to be Mogadishu on steroids.
	Look, I don't respect David Petraeus.
	I mean, this is a diet-in-the-wool globalist.
	However, if you talk about Mogadishu, remember, Black Hawk Down, you know, that movie, that experience.
	He says, if Hamas turns out to be, quote, as creative in defense as they were in the horrific, barbaric, unspeakable attack of Then you'll see suicide bombers.
	You'll see improvised explosive devices.
	There'll be ambushes, booby traps, urban settings.
	Again, this could not be more challenging.
	It's hard for me to imagine a more difficult setting than this particular one.
	And I was one who commanded forces in a number of major urban operations.
	He said, you don't win counterinsurgencies in a year or two.
	They typically take a decade or more, as we saw in Iraq, as we saw in Afghanistan.
	He doesn't point out that we lost in Afghanistan.
	He said, Petraeus said, Israel already needs to think about how it intends to eventually restore and rebuild Gaza once it considers its battle against Hamas 1.
	Well, I don't think they have any intention of doing that.
	The U.S. Embassy is telling Americans and Lebanon, get out while you still can.
	Well, maybe we should get out of this war situation.
	Maybe we should get out of these entangling alliances while we still can.
	But they don't want that.
	As a matter of fact, it's our people who want the war.
	More than anything else, they will not talk about peace.
	And look at what has been happening.
	Ever since, we've got drones attacking a U.S. military base in southern Syria.
	Why are we there? Why are we there?
	A military base in southern Syria where U.S. troops have maintained a presence, and as AP puts it, Associated Press, why?
	Why are we there? To train forces as part of a broad campaign against the Islamic State.
	One drone was shut down, another has caused minor injuries.
	We're there because we're there to steal the oil, as Trump said.
	And so we have soldiers in Syria that we put there.
	Do we ever declare war? Do we ever declare that we're there?
	We've got soldiers in Iraq that have been attacked.
	We've got shooting with a ship that said it intercepted missiles sent out of Yemen.
	Yeah, a lot of...
	This is one of the reasons why I began the show with what I was talking about today.
	Think about this. Pray about this.
	Pray about this. The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲