All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 3, 2023 - The David Knight Show
03:01:09
The David Knight Show - 08/03/2023
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The End free speech to free minds.
Music You're listening to The David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 3rd of August, year of our Lord, 2023.
3.
Today we're going to talk about a wide variety of subjects.
We're going to stay off of the Trump indictments for change.
I know everybody wants to talk about that.
We talked about it yesterday. We've got to move on to things that really affect our lives.
And we're going to talk today about the threats, the technological threats coming at us.
But it's essentially a car ban.
More rules every week from Biden shutting down power plants that power the grid for the EV cars, but also shutting down the internal combustion engines.
We have pushes for trying to bring out...
The automated trucks that is now being pushed in many different areas.
We're also going to take a look at some of the other aspects of the political campaign and the discussions that are there.
Ramaswamy, is he on our side?
Or is he a globalist?
We'll take a look at that, but we're going to begin with revolution and secession here in the U.S.
We'll be right back.
Well, just in case there's any questions about where Kevin McCarthy from California is, the House Speaker.
New American points out he's been spotted at the Bohemian Grove doing the religious rites to the pagan entities there.
as this is something that goes back well-documented in the Bible, Old Testament, the people there that were The Canaanites, then what the Romans call Palestine.
The Canaanites, as they passed children through the fire, as they worshipped pagan entities in groves of trees.
We're back to that.
That's really what the Bohemian society is really about.
Of course, they've added some other wrinkles to it, but when you get back, when you look at all this stuff, It always goes back to these same spiritual templates, doesn't it?
And so, as the New American points out, the intimate connection between secret societies and the nation's political elite is as strong as ever.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy was among those present at this year's infamous meeting at the Secretive Bohemian Club in Mont Rio, California, Bohemian Grove.
And, of course, it has always hosted people like the William Randolph Hearst and the Rockefellers, as they point out, Ronald Reagan, Richard Nixon have been there.
Reportedly, the place where Robert Oppenheimer first discussed the Manhattan Project.
New American points out that Trump is notably the one major power player who's not known to have been involved in Bohemian Grove.
Does that mean that he's not part of the club?
Obviously, he's not part of the club in the sense that they don't like him.
But why did he do everything that the globalists wanted?
He attended Davos.
And he attended the last meeting that they had before the so-called fake global pandemic.
So anyway, as Politico points out, one name that came up as they were talking about who they could run was General Admiral William McRaven.
Former Special Operations Commander who became Chancellor of the University of Texas.
Now McRaven was head of the SEALs and McRaven, at the time that Jade Helm was coming out, was very adamant that Special Operations needed to get back to their core.
And he said, our core is not kinetic operations.
It's not jumping out of planes.
Our core is PSYOPs.
And that was when they were running Jade Helm.
And I've said many times, I believe, that Jade Helm As a matter of fact, when he was talking about that, he said really the purpose of special forces troops were to prepare the ground for future action in a particular country.
One of the key ways that you do that is to go in and find out who is on your side and who's going to stand against you.
And that's what Jade Helm was about, in my opinion.
And so these people would love to have somebody like him, but I think that's a pipe dream at this point in time.
I think it's more likely to be somebody like Grabbin Nuisance out of California.
Someone like that who will come in as a dark horse candidate.
He's already making his moves, as a matter of fact.
A bohemian groove writes a new American.
Groove. They're in the groove.
The world's rich and powerful dress and ceremonial garb.
Chant around a bonfire in the forest and burn a child in effigy.
And the presence of a large owl-shaped idol.
Nothing suspicious about that at all, right?
Of course. And, yeah, it is passing a child through the fire.
They're reenacting the sacrifices to Moloch.
That we saw in the Canaan.
And of course, you know, when you go through the Bible, you look at the fact that they built these worship areas and the forest and all the rest of the stuff.
Nothing really changes. It always goes back to that same pagan root that is always opposed to God and His people.
The group was started after the Civil War, writes the New American, as a club for artists, writers, journalists, and other bohemians.
You know, artists, you know, bohemians.
But then they took it over.
For the world's elites, 2,500 of them, they said typically.
During their time at Bohemian Grove, members walk around the forest in the nude, inebriated, urinating at will throughout the camp.
And that's been referred to by Nixon and Clinton and all those other things.
It's kind of a gay hangout as well.
During the notorious cremation of care ceremony, in which a human effigy, a small child, is sacrificed to their owl statue, The Bohemians take part in a sermon which includes, and they have the whole sermon here, and it is this kind of, you know, faux-religious sermon like you would see out of the Masons or these types of organizations.
Part of it, we shall read the sign, Midsummer sets us free, ye shall burn me once again.
Not with these flames, which hither ye have brought from regions where I reign.
Oh, where I reign.
Ye fools and priests, I spit upon your fire, O owl, prince of mortal wisdom, owl of Bohemia.
We beseech thee, grant us thy counsel, O great owl of Bohemia.
I wonder how long it's going to take before Michael Flynn starts reading this prayer at his Reawaken America tour thing.
He's already done Elizabeth Clare Prophet's prayer to her ascended masters.
How long will it be before Flynn reads this one and has people chant along with him, you know, Trump supporters?
Anyway, we thank thee for thy adjuration.
Be gone, detested care.
Be gone. Once more we banish thee.
Be gone, dull care.
Fire should have its will of thee.
And Midsummer sets us free.
Well, as they point out, this harkens back the owl as a symbol of the Bavarian Illuminati.
The Owl of Minerva was an emblem used in their Minerval degree, but of course we also know that if you look at Washington, D.C., an aerial picture, pull up the aerial picture, Travis, that has another one that's got the red outline on it, but the other one. There you go, right there.
Do you see the owl? Do you see the owl there in the layout?
You know, around the Capitol building.
Right at the center of it.
The eyes, the tail, the body, and so forth.
Now pull up the one that's got the red outline on it.
Yeah, there we go. Makes it a little bit easier to see, doesn't it?
It even has the feet in there and those little circles there.
Now go back to the other one.
Yeah, once you see it, you can't unsee it, can you?
The historical order of the Illuminati, which even George Washington knew of and warned against, was a conspiratorial group, writes the New American, that sought to undermine Christianity and the governments of the day and replace them with a one-world system that would eliminate private property, provide for the state-rearing of children, and instill vice instead of biblical morality.
And at the center of the L is the U.S. Capitol.
Because it is at the center of that agenda, folks.
We are the globalists.
Not we, but the United States, us.
The U.S. of A is the center of globalism.
It truly is. They are the ones who push out the agenda.
Just like NATO. Well, what do we do about it?
I got a letter from a listener, Tom.
He says, It was anything but peaceful.
And it included a tax revolt too.
And if they were around now, they would secede and never let the U.S. get to our present state of our union.
If you say otherwise, you're part of the problem, not of the solution.
To fix what ails the U.S. Come out from D.C. and be separate, as God's word says.
Well, I think that's true, but we have to be very careful of people who offer us A Hegelian program.
Well, you're either this or that.
You're either with us or you're against us.
You know, there's two kinds of people.
Those who separate the world into two kinds of people and those who don't.
Sometimes things are a little bit more complex about this.
And I'm not saying this to backpedal on anything.
I agree with the fundamental principle.
But we also might want to look at how the Second War of Independence turned out.
Also known as the Civil War.
They don't always go our way.
And you better make sure that you're prepared.
And you better make sure that you've got a chance of winning.
And if you don't have a chance of winning, then maybe you want to do it in a different way other than full-on direct challenge and succession.
And if you are a Christian, you have another consideration as well.
And that is the just war.
Because when he talks about this, and the reference of the article that he sent to me, talks about it.
Before you want secession and a hot civil war, we're in a cold civil war already and have been for quite some time.
But before you go to a hot civil war, you better think about the moral considerations of this.
You do not want to be escalating violence.
You want to be taking that down.
And you also need to, as much as depends upon you, try to live peaceably with other people.
Now, I'm not saying that means that we roll over for all this stuff.
And I'm not saying that the founders were not justified in what they did.
I believe that they were.
But it was also important, and when you look at the Civil War, and that's the way most of the leadership in the South viewed it, they viewed it as a continuation, a secession.
It wasn't a Civil War. They were not trying to take over the North, right?
That's what a real Civil War is.
It wasn't like everybody was fighting over control of America.
We're going to take the capital from you and we're going to have a government that rules everybody.
So who is it that's going to rule over this unified government?
That was not what the Civil War was about.
Civil War was about secession, which was the basis of the American Revolution in the first place.
It was about self-government.
I always support secession in principle, but there are practical considerations we have to look at as well.
We need to think, first of all, how do we extract ourselves individually from this system?
What methods can we do individually and peacefully to extract ourselves from it?
And then what do we do collectively?
And as I've said before, way before you get to the point of secession and violent civil war, You need to try the peaceful alternative, which is nullification.
And that is there.
That is there in the Constitution.
The law and authority are on our side.
And I think it's interesting when you go back and look at the history of the Civil War, there was a move A big move for nullification in the 1830s, about 30 years before war broke out, 1831 perhaps.
It was the tariffs of abomination, they called it in the South.
It's kind of funny when you go back and you look at Thomas Jefferson in his second inaugural address and he said, You know, we have eliminated internal taxes so that no farmer, laborer, so forth, knows a taxman.
They didn't say they were not taxed.
They certainly were taxed.
But the taxes were collected at the border.
They were not internal taxes.
And what happened with the Civil War as part of that fourth turning, as part of the rise of the industrial revolution, Power state and the rise of the nation state.
And that happened, as I pointed out many times, happened at exactly the same time we had a civil war.
There was a civil war in Italy.
Now that civil war was about who was going to control the nation state.
It was not a war of secession.
And it didn't have slavery.
But it was part of the fourth turning where agrarian power centers were changing into industrialized power centers.
And Jefferson always believed that an agrarian society was essential to liberty because you had to have that independence that comes from self-sufficiency.
And if you can grow your own food, you are self-sufficient.
And so he thought that was core.
And yet, in the build-up to the Civil War, part of the economic issues involved in that, certainly not just slavery, but an even bigger issue than slavery economically, Was the taxation issue.
The South wanted to have open trade.
They didn't want to have protectionism at the border.
They didn't want to have taxes at the border.
The industrial groups wanted to have protectionism.
And so the South and the agrarian society that Thomas Jefferson wanted...
Also wanted a tax system that was different from what Thomas Jefferson did.
And kind of an interesting contradiction that was there.
But nevertheless, what happened in the 1830s?
They put on massive tariffs.
And the South said, well, that's going to basically destroy our, you know, everything that we do is exported to the UK. The cotton is exported to their textile industry.
So they came right up to the point of nullification and secession.
They said, we're going to nullify these and we may wind up seceding.
And it was centered in South Carolina.
Andrew Jackson headed that off at the last minute.
And there was a spirit of compromise at that time.
And I believe that that was because that was, you know, it was only midway through the 80-year cycle.
We see these fourth turnings.
When it came to 1861, everybody just jumped into secession right away.
That's why I'm going back over this.
They didn't really try nullification.
They just jumped into secession.
And again, it came from South Carolina, was where the hotbed of dissent was.
But 60 years later, they just went straight to secession instead of nullification, because at that point in time, in a fourth turning, you're getting rid of institutions.
People have had it with the institutions.
They see them as corrupt and irredeemable, and so they just wanted to get out of it.
That is the time that we are in right now.
We're in the middle of a fourth turning.
If you want to understand why everything is accelerating, And why we're seeing this type of stuff, and why you're seeing this massive polarization, the absolute disgust with our institutions, especially the federal ones, things like the FBI and all the rest of these things.
That's why you have politicians now saying the kind of stuff that they would never say 30 years ago.
We were the ones who were radical when we were saying, abolish the IRS, abolish the income tax, abolish the FBI. But now you hear this coming out of mainstream politicians who are saying this.
Because that's the time that we're in.
And so we have to be careful about what we are going to do.
And we have to act, I think, not to allow them to goad us into a position of aggression, but remain in a position of defense, defense of the Constitution, defense of our way of life, And, of course, to organize ourselves and not allow them to push us around.
The article that he sent to me was from TexMars.com.
The headline is, A Duty to Throw Off Tyranny.
Go along to get along is no longer an option.
Well, I agree. That's why I always reject this idea that we're going to play 4D chess.
Well, you're playing their game.
And again, Trump is more than willing to play that game, isn't he?
But let me just say, when we looked at What has happened since 2020?
What about the masks?
What about the closures of businesses and schools and all of our way of life?
What about the distancing?
What about the jabs and all the rest of this stuff?
This was slave training by the government, and I hope you didn't go along with it.
And if you did go along with it, I hope you've learned your lesson.
This was slave training by the government.
Training for submission.
But it was also training for freedom.
By God. You know, one of the things, and I've talked about this many times, is they shut the schools down and went to Zoom classes.
You finally had a situation where parents could see what was actually happening, not just in the bigger, you know, educational system coming out of Washington, or even at the state level, or even at the district level, or even at the school level.
They would always say, but it's not my kid's classroom.
They've got a good teacher. But when they got locked down, they were able to see the Zoom classes and they were able to see what was happening in their school, in their kids' actual classroom.
It was a time to wake up.
And so I hope this has been a wake-up call these last three and a half years.
It has been a wake-up call, I hope, for you.
Never again. Never again will we tolerate this.
Now, we've got about a third of the people who didn't go along with most of this stuff, by my estimation.
And yet, the vast majority of them still see the man who locked us down as the solution.
There's a lot of work to do before we want to try to take on the United States government, because we've got a lot of people who still don't understand who the team players are.
They don't understand who's on our side.
They don't understand the principles that they're going to fight for.
There's, you know, before you try secession, you need to try nullification.
And before you do nullification, you've got to have an educated, critical thinking population.
And even though you saw people pushing back against this, and ultimately walking away from it, the vast majority of the people still don't understand that Trump did this stuff.
And so that's the key thing.
That's the key thing. They still think, just like the parents who said, well, it's not my kid's classroom.
They still think, well, it's not our President Trump didn't do this.
It was somebody else, you know, just like it was, well, it was, you know, the Department of Education in Washington, or it was a state, or it was the school district or something.
It wasn't my classroom. No, it was your classroom teacher.
And yes, it is Donald Trump who did this stuff to you.
Get over it. Look at what happened.
Objectively, critically, And as they point out in this thing, as they're pushing people, they say, well, honor is not just a word.
Honor is defined as honesty, fairness, integrity, and one's belief in actions.
Integrity is what you do when nobody's watching, except God.
A man's word was all that was needed to secure a loan from a bank.
A handshake would seal a deal that was unbreakable, and so forth, right?
And if you broke that, well, you know, you were ostracized.
But that was at a time when everybody knew everybody.
We didn't have a mobile society.
Now you just pick up and you go to another area of the country and start all over again.
You do something like that.
These are people who have been there in this town and everybody knew them.
You go back and you look again at the Civil War.
You look at the players that were there on both sides.
It really does read like a Dickens novel.
Everybody knows everybody else is connected to somebody in some way or the other.
I mean, you go back and you look at Harper's Ferry and John Brown's revolution there.
The people who were called to put it down was Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson.
I mean, it is like a little, you know, that's one of the things that makes the Civil War history so interesting is how, you know, connected it is, right?
Everything happened between Washington, D.C. and Richmond pretty much, and they were only 100 miles apart, but the people were even closer.
It's a close-knit community.
Everybody knew each other for generations.
And that kind of accountability we don't have anymore in our society.
Liars, cheaters, thieves are gathering filthy lucre by the barrel in a quest to become king of the mountain.
Is this not a description of all of the politicians in Washington, D.C., pretty much?
Especially Trump? All the stuff about 40 chests, doesn't that throw the whole idea of honor and integrity out?
Oh, don't worry about it. I know he's a liar.
He's deceiving them.
He's not lying to you.
He's not deceiving you. Ultimately, he's going to come back and do the right thing.
Well, we'd already established that he was a liar, cheating a thief by his personal life, and he was proud of it.
That's the key thing. Donald Trump is unique in the sense that he's not LGBT, but he is proud of his sins.
Yeah, everybody does it.
Say the people who excuse that for Trump.
Everybody does for DHS. Well, again, in this article he says, the time is at hand for patriotic Americans to consider secession as a possibility to separate from this tyrannical government.
Now, I say nullification first.
I say think about the principles of just war.
Think about the fact that we are one and one.
On this type of thing. And so it's not a guaranteed win.
Everybody thinks at the beginning, oh, well, this is going to be over.
Immediately, everybody on both sides, north and south, said this is going to be a cakewalk.
We'll take those other guys in no time at all.
The casualty figures of the Civil War are just astounding.
Even a small battle was more people killed than we typically have in our wars today.
The entire war on our side.
And, of course, there's the Christian principle that as much as it depends upon you, live peacefully with other people.
So, it's tempting to beat your chest and to scream into a bullhorn and say, you want to fight?
You got one. But you know what that leads to?
That leads to the kind of futile, poorly considered things that we saw on January the 6th.
Do you want another January the 6th?
Do you want to run out there beating your chest and blowing in your bullhorn?
You better think about what you're doing.
And so we are at the point, as I have in this article, Scottish economist Alexander Tyler, 1787, I'm sure you've heard this, he talks about the new American Republic.
He said they always, great civilizations go on a cycle of about 200 years.
They progress from bondage to moral certitude, from moral certitude to great courage.
From great courage to liberty, from liberty to abundance, from abundance to selfishness, selfishness to complacency, complacency to apathy, apathy to dependency.
That's where we are right now.
We've been in that for a while, actually.
And the final stage is from that dependency stage to bondage.
So you are here.
We're at the dependency to bondage stage.
That's where we are right now.
So that's the cycle of civilizations, but of course there is a sub-cycle of that, of the fourth turning.
And so...
He says, timid men have the intellect of a slave.
I've lost track of how many times I've just responded to people on social media, on Twitter.
When I would push back against the masks and all the rest of this stuff, and these people would lecture me with their faux science, and I would tell them, I would just reply, you have the mindset of a slave.
Because they did. They kept, oh, herd immunity.
No, I said, you have herd mentality.
You don't think critically. You follow your orders of your authority figure, and you have the mindset of a slave.
And MAGA has the mindset of a slave right now.
If you want to have a revolt, you can't have the mindset of a slave.
And so, you know, understand where we are.
Understand also... What this can many times look like.
I've talked many times about William Wilberforce, and this is a recent article about him from Breakpoint.
It said, William Wilberforce's life was a direct rebuke to privatized faith.
Yes, we have to do everything that we can to prepare our relationship with God.
That is the basis for us.
As I've said many times, that fulcrum gives us the leverage to move the universe, quite frankly.
But we have to have that fulcrum there.
And we have to have that relationship.
It has to be the basis of what we do.
And it was for William Wilberforce.
But we're not called to just, okay, I'm going to save myself.
And to hell with the community and society and all the rest of this stuff.
That isn't going to work, quite frankly.
You've got to have connections.
You've got to have community. And so just from a pragmatic standpoint, that doesn't work.
But as I pointed out in this, it was a direct rebuke to the privatized faith, to a kind of monastic life.
But it's also, we have to understand, the first step in any kind of change is to have leaders who are men of character and men of conviction.
And folks, there aren't any people like that running for president.
That's why I say I'm not endorsing anybody for president.
We'll talk about the directions that they're going to attack us.
We'll talk about their backgrounds.
One of the reasons I talk about their backgrounds is to get you to look at them with critical thinking.
Don't make gods out of these people.
And that's what everybody wants.
Our heart is an idol factory.
We want somebody. Well, who do you support?
Even if you're saying, well, I'm voting for the lesser two evils.
Don't get attached to any of these people.
Stay attached to principles.
Principles. He said, 190 years ago, today, the great British parliamentarian and abolitionist William Wilberforce died at the home of his cousin.
This was yesterday. Near Westminster, London.
Three days earlier, Parliament had passed the Slavery Abolition Act, which abolished slavery in British colonies, freeing more than 800,000 enslaved Africans in the Caribbean and South Africa, as well as a number in Canada, on condition that the Crown compensated slave owners.
And I'll just insert here that they spent, in terms of buying their freedom, The British government spent less money to buy the freedom of these 800,000 slaves than the American government spent to buy ammunition to kill about the same number of Americans in a civil war.
It was not about slavery.
That was one of the economic aspects of it.
But again, it was about a fourth turning.
It was about industrial versus agrarian.
It was about the creation of a consolidated nation-state.
It was about a lot of different things that were economically as big as slavery.
That was one of the components, but it was happening all over the world at that time.
But getting back to Wilberforce, when his friend Thomas Babington Macaulay delivered the news, Wilberforce allegedly responded, Thank God that I should have lived to witness the day in which England is willing to give 20 million sterling for the abolition of slavery.
That had been his life's work, and it had taken him an entire lifetime.
And understand, first he stopped the slave trade, and then it was decades beyond that before they abolished and freed the slaves.
Upon news of his death, which happened three days after that act, Newspapers around the world proclaim that Wilberforce was, quote, as pure and virtuous a man as ever lived.
However, during his life he endured incredible opposition, even hostility.
England benefited both economically and militarily from the transatlantic slave trade.
Some 46,000 British families owned slaves, and during war with France, abolitionists were accused of being unpatriotic.
In a private letter The legendary naval hero, Lord Horatio Nelson, wrote that he would never surrender Britain's West India possessions whilst I have an arm to fight in their defense or a tongue to launch my voice against the damnable and cursed doctrine of Wilberforce and his hypocritical allies.
Now, I've been to London on many occasions, and I never saw a monument to Wilberforce.
There is one, I guess, somewhere.
But you can't miss Trafalgar Square with Lord Nelson up on a pedestal.
I don't know, 70, 80 feet?
Maybe more, I don't know.
One of Wilberforce's most vocal opponents, a slave trader, named George Hibbert, was a fellow congregant at his church.
So there's going to be that aspect of it as well, if you understand.
The person who encouraged him, of course...
Now, he was going to get out of politics.
He was not a Christian when he got into politics.
When he became a Christian, he was going to quit.
He was going to essentially live a monastic life.
And he knew John Newton, the guy who wrote Amazing Grace and many other hymns, but that's the only one really that people remember.
John Newton had been a slave trader, and John Newton had actually been a slave.
He'd been on both sides of this.
And one of the key things about John Newton was he understood That the cross of Christ had taken away what he had done and also what was done to him.
It allowed him to forgive his enemies and allowed him to get absolution and to pursue his life.
But also involved in this was William Pitt, who was always a friend of the American cause of freedom, interestingly enough.
And as a matter of fact, we used to live in North Carolina.
We lived in a town, one of the, I think it was like the second oldest town in the state, that was named after him, Pittsburgh.
And the county was Chatham County, because William Pitt was Lord Chatham, so they honored him with both the name of the town and the county.
Pitt wrote to Wilberforce, he said, as Wilberforce was thinking of getting out of politics and just pursuing essentially a monastic life, he said, Surely the principles as well as the practice of Christianity are simple, and they lead not to meditation only, but to action.
To action. His fiercely unpopular crusade against the slave trade consumed his health and cost him politically, but he could not stand idly by and see the image of God enslaved and abused in the holes of ships.
He endured verbal assaults and was even challenged to a duel by an angry slave ship captain.
And, of course, refusing to fight that duel, branded a coward for refusing to fight on those terms.
He was not a coward.
He was a man of steel.
He had a determination and a backbone.
He could take the insults.
He could take the slurs and the smears.
When the French Revolution began, Wilberforce's detractors charged that the Humanist Revolution would sweep England and that Wilberforce, with his passion for slaves, was suspicious.
Nevertheless, Wilberforce notes, a man who fears God is not at liberty to give up.
Wilberforce's worldview led him to engage in more than just the issue of slavery.
He sold his home. He dismissed his servants to have more money to give to the needy.
He fought for prison reform.
He founded or participated in 60 charities and on and on.
He even founded the British Informed Bible Society and many other things like that.
And so Breakpoint writes, all of us would do well to take Pitt's words to Wilberforce to heart.
Surely the principles and the practice of Christianity lead not just to meditation only, but to action.
And it is something that we have to keep in balance.
You don't want to fall off that other side.
You don't want to get so focused on charity and good works to humanity that you lose your connection to God.
That is your foundation.
And so you don't want to lose that, that connection to God, your connection to the Bible, your faith.
That has to be first.
All the rest of this stuff is the fruit of that.
And if you start to make that your priority, you're going to fall in the same trap of secular humanism.
Eventually you're going to say, well, if that's my most important thing, I've got to play 4D chess.
That means that I can cut corners.
That means that I can lie, cheat, steal, lose my integrity in order to achieve that noble end.
No, you have to stay focused on God or you will descend into a kind of secular pragmatism or even paganism like we saw in Bohemian Grove.
So, again, we go back to this.
We have to ask, you know, what are the principles of a just war?
And will we...
Focus on those principles as we push back against this move to enslave us.
We are at war.
They have enslaved our minds.
They have addicted us to many things, to comfort, to pornography, to drugs, to entertainment, to comfort, to affluence.
And so, just as we were during 2020, we have to have that mind and we have to keep that mind.
This is not over.
It's not over. They're not done.
This is a pause.
They're coming back at us and they're going to come back much harder and they're not going to let up the next time.
Not the next time.
Not with this climate MacGuffin.
They're not going to ease up with that.
So you better be ready.
You prepare yourself. First you prepare yourself with your relationship with God.
Then you make preparations for yourself and your family.
But you've got to have some kind of strategy to win this thing.
And that key thing is that we have to have men of character as leaders.
And there are not any who are running for president.
And I will debate that with anybody out there.
We'll be right back. Unlike most revolutions, where the people rise against a real economic oppression, in our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle.
It is, however, not nearly so abstract as a young gentleman supposes.
The issue involved here is one of monopoly.
Today, the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country.
Tomorrow it will be something else.
Tomorrow it will be something else.
Tomorrow it will be something else.
It's your move.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Just make no mistake, the people who rule us in every country, regardless of their political philosophy, in every country, are warmongers.
They openly want war with foreign governments, and they openly want war with us as well.
A good example of this is what happened yesterday with Trudeau.
He's been holding town halls across the country, and he allows ordinary people to ask him questions, and he got a straight-up question that he didn't want to deal with.
Essentially, what he did was he accused a person of being a traitor, of being with Russia.
Same thing that happened to Wilberforce.
Oh, well, you know, you're with the French revolutionaries, or you are a traitor to our country.
And that's basically what he did.
And so here's the clip where a man asked him, you know, why don't you give peace a chance, essentially?
First of all, what's your name?
Oh, sorry. My name is Michael.
Canada is traditionally known for advocating for peace.
I know we are a member of NATO, but I know we don't have a nuclear weapon.
Why has your government failed To draft a peace proposal to end this war in Ukraine.
I'm gonna have to call you out, Michael.
You're completely wrong about the war in Ukraine.
It is not a proxy war between the United States and Russia right now.
Yes, it is. That's Russian propaganda and disinformation.
My job is to call that stuff out.
Yeah, my job is to call that stuff out.
I've been told, yeah, this is the war, and we're going to push this, just like he was told.
We're going to push the war against your citizens.
We are going to have lockdowns and masks, and if anybody dares to push back against this, even in a very peaceful way, well, we'll steal their money, we'll do other things like that, you know, as he did for them.
And so to say, you know, Canada's always been known for peace.
So why aren't you doing anything in terms of trying to get both of these sides to the negotiating table?
We're not stupid. We all see what is happening.
They take every opportunity they can to push and to escalate the war.
There is never any backtrack that is done to look for peace.
It is not a justified war.
We're preemptively pushing this, and have been for quite some time, if you want to go back and look at the history.
But if you're not even debating the history, why don't we just try to get people at the table and try to stop the killing?
Well, because they don't want to stop the killing.
Why has your government failed to draft a peace proposal to end this war in Ukraine?
Well, I'm going to call you out.
You're a Russian disinformation agent.
I like the little meme that they put at the end of this article on Zero Hedge.
It's done as a children's book, a little golden book.
Everyone I don't agree with is a Russian bot, a child's guide to media and government excuse-making for political failings.
That's exactly what we're looking at here.
You know, it is amazing to me to see how this whole thing is developed with Epstein.
And again, it's another example of people not being able to discern who is on our side and who is with us.
Now there is, the FBI has now asked the judge to block the release of more Epstein files as there has been a Freedom of Information Act request filed to try to get some of that information by Radar Online.
So the Department of Justice has asked a New York judge to agree to the categorical withholding of the FBI's top secret files.
The person who is running this investigation, by the way, is the daughter of Jim Comey, Maureen Comey.
She is the lead prosecutor for the Department of Justice in the Ghislaine Maxwell Prosecution.
And there may be an appeal on this, so she says, well, we don't want to let this information out because that might corrupt a jury if we have some other trials on this or whatever.
But the first trial focused primarily on the abuse of six victims, and many exhibits were received under seal to protect the privacy of those victims and other third parties, she said.
Isn't it interesting that this woman is found guilty of trafficking?
We pointed out she's guilty of trafficking children to people.
But we're not allowed to know the names of these powerful, elitist Johns.
You know, they're the ones who actually did the sexual abuse.
She brought the kids to them, and they actually did it.
But she gets punished.
We're not even allowed to know their names.
Except we do know the people who were on the flights, don't we?
We know people like Donald Trump and RFK Jr.
were on those flights, and Bill Clinton and many others.
But we're not allowed to know anything else about that.
So despite the lawsuit that has been filed in the past, Epstein, when he was still allowed, was allowed to plead guilty to a single count of soliciting prostitution from a minor.
He only served 13 months in prison, but if you remember the conditions of this, it was kind of like Otis from the Andy Griffith show, you know, the town drunk who would come in at the end of the night and voluntarily lock himself in the cell and sleep it off.
That's what he did. He got day release.
He didn't really serve any time in jail.
And who were the people that put together that sweetheart deal there in Florida?
Well, his defense attorneys were Alan Dershowitz, And who's hard on the side of Donald Trump right now.
And Ken Starr.
Ken Starr. The guy who went easy on Bill Clinton and got him to go easy on Jeffrey Epstein and then went to Baylor and protected the football team from charges of sexual allegation.
That was three strikes and he was out at that point in time.
But of course the prosecutor who also put together this sweetheart deal is the one who has even more culpability in it.
And that was Alex Acosta at the time.
Remember that name? Trump made Alex Acosta, the prosecutor who let Jeffrey Epstein get away unpunished.
He made him head of the Department of Labor, his labor secretary, part of his cabinet.
You know, I wonder if anybody ever contacted Alex Acosta to see if he wants to endorse Trump.
I don't think he's one of the four people who endorses Trump.
And yet, with all of that, James Caviezel takes his movie to Trump's Bedminster residence, and they have a big party there.
And James Caviezel thinks that Trump is the way to stop the Epsteins of the world.
This is why I said we are not ready to fight these people.
We don't even know. We can't separate the Benedict Donalds from the George Washingtons.
We're not ready to do this, and the vast majority of Republicans can't do that.
To this day. And so they are pushing to try to keep all this stuff still sealed up, not let anyone see anything that is happening to all these rich and powerful people.
By the way, it's not just a cashless society, but it's a paperless society that they want to get us into.
And the IRS has aspirations of going completely paperless by 2025.
That's just a couple of years from now.
And they've already tried this once.
Do you remember last year when they tried to do this?
They announced that if you wanted to, if you're a business and you're filing your stuff, you're going to have to, any reports and everything that you had to do, you were going to have to log in to a portal.
That was going to be the plan.
And it only failed because they couldn't get the software to work right.
It was so backlogged and everything.
They couldn't get biometric type of stuff on people.
But that's the plan. There's a plan, yet another thing, to have an ID so that you can pay your taxes, to go paperless, to have it all via computer.
Remember, you know, Ukraine put out a video.
What's it going to look like in Ukraine 2030 when we've beaten the Russians?
Well, we can do everything.
You know, all of our interaction with government will be online and on your phone, and it'll be so wonderful.
You know, your phone, your big brother device that the NSA laughs about.
Who would have thought in 1984 they show a picture of the Macintosh thing that this would be Big Brother, they show Steve Jobs holding the iPhone, and that the zombies would line up to pay for it?
Well, that's going to be not just your tracking device, but it's also going to be the way that you interact with government, with everything, to go paperless.
They will get the bugs worked out eventually.
And as I point out in this article from AOL, Uh, this is what they say, well, we got $80 billion in order to do this stuff from the Democrats.
And that's what the IRS is bragging about.
We got all that money, you know, they're going to hire, um, uh, they got like 80, 85, I think it's, uh, uh, $80 billion and they're going to hire, uh, 80,000 or 85,000 IRS employees or something like that.
But they want to go paperless by 2025.
Here's a question. You know, they, they, part of what they were selling the stuff world was they said, We've got a big backlog in paperwork, and so we need to have more employees.
Well, they're saying the backlog in paperwork, they want to get away with that by going paperless.
Okay, so why do you still need to hire so many agents?
Well, you and I both know that the agents are going to be there for the confiscation, to make sure that you own nothing.
They'll be able to audit people, the fine-tooth comb.
You go completely paperless, they will have artificial intelligence and the rest of this.
The effort is being financed, says AOL, through the $80 billion infusion of cash for the IRS. And that's what they said.
Janet Yellen, the Treasury Secretary, said we're in the process of transforming the IRS into a digital-first agency.
By the next filing season, she said, taxpayers will be able to digitally submit all correspondence, all non-tax forms, and all notice responses to the IRS. Will you be able to do that?
Will you be able to choose that?
Or will they require it?
Because they were going to require this portal identification a year ago.
It was simply the technical issues that kept that from happening.
Taxpayers, she said, of course, will always have the choice to submit documents by paper.
Oh, yes. That's not right.
Yeah, they're not going to get rid of all cash and push us into CBDC. And they're not going to require us to have digital IDs of this stuff.
And yet they already did. They already tried to do that.
And again, the only thing that stopped them was their incompetence.
The processing change is expected to cut back on the $40 million per year that the agency spends on storing more than 1 billion historical documents of paper.
Oh, it doesn't cost to store electronic stuff?
Well, just ask the NSA. Yeah, in Bluffdale, Utah.
They got a big facility there where they're storing everything.
And they're using as much water and power as an entire city would.
It doesn't cost anything to file it electronically and store it electronically.
Right, yeah. It's just like, you know, they worry about...
The only thing they worry about in terms of power usage with computers is not all the...
Biometric identification, real-time surveillance, and real-time data mining and correlation of all this stuff.
No. They're only worried about crypto mining.
Only worried about crypto mining.
So they will always portray this as, well, you know, we've got to...
By the way... 81% of the people filed electronically this last time.
So they're getting pretty close there.
And you know they will just require that aspect.
The federal tax collector's funding is still vulnerable, says AOL. Poor IRS. They're vulnerable.
You know, these bad Republicans want to take some money from the IRS, but not much.
House Republicans built a $1.4 billion reduction into the IRS, into the debt ceiling.
Oh, well, okay. So Biden gives them $80 billion, and the Republicans, those evil Republicans, took back $1.4 billion.
They're already portraying that as a cut.
Well, it's not. And then they said, and they also have a separate agreement, To take $20 billion from the IRS over the next two years and divert that to other non-defense programs.
Okay, so $21.4 billion they took back.
So, you know, the federal government, Biden and the Democrats take 80 steps forward and the Republicans take 21.5 steps back.
This is the ratcheting effect.
This is what we always see from the Republicans.
And they called that a cut.
No, that's 60 steps forward.
So, when you look at what is happening with free speech, I thought it was an interesting take from mainstream media, and it was put up on Drudge Report, as Elon Musk has filed a lawsuit against the censorship group, the Center for Countering Digital Hate.
This is a group that censors people.
They identify people like me to be taken down.
Because you oppose whatever their government narrative is.
Yeah, I'm with Putin or something.
I oppose their phony pandemic.
I oppose their vaccines.
I oppose their climate grifts and the rest of the stuff.
So I've got to be taken down.
That makes me a hateful person.
And so this Center for Countering Digital Hate is being sued.
And so the mainstream media article that Drudge put out was it shows what a free speech hypocrite Elon Musk is.
That he would shut down this censorship group.
It's like, what? No, actually what he's doing is he's making them play by their own rules.
This is a Saul Alinsky thing, right?
Oh, wow. You want to censor people?
How do you like it when we do it to you as well?
Giving them a taste of their own censorship.
No, it certainly is something that I'm happy to see.
By the way, the headline from Zero Hedge Twitter sues pro-censorship woke skulls over false and misleading claims.
I don't like the term woke.
I've hated that. These people are not awake.
They're completely asleep.
We've got to stop calling them woke.
Call them a joke.
And they're a bunch of jokers.
Just like the Joker in Batman.
They've got all this weird makeup on.
Green hair and the rest of the stuff.
And they're quite dangerous.
And evil. And they're villains.
And so we should call them jokers.
Not woke. They're a joke.
This whole thing is a joke.
It ought to be laughed at.
X is a free public service, said Elon Musk, that is funded largely by advertisers.
Through the CCDH's scare campaign and its ongoing pressure on brands to prevent the public's access to free expression, they're actively working to prevent public dialogue.
Yes, they don't like free speech.
They are the hypocrites to complain about this when they get a taste of their own medicines.
X also claims that the organization has recently scraped their platform, which she said is a violation of our terms of service.
And it continued.
He said, X not only rejects all claims made by the CCDH, but through our own investigation we have identified several ways in which they are actively working to prevent free expression, including targeting people on all platforms who speak about issues that they don't agree with,
attempting to coerce the deplatforming of users whose views do not conform to their ideological agenda, Targeting free speech organizations by focusing on their revenue stream to remove free services for people.
Attempting to illegally gain unauthorized access to social media platform data in order to misuse that data.
And they talked about the person that is the head of it.
An operative named Imran Ahmad.
As noticed by journalist Paul Thacker, he quoted, he said, How does this background as a political operative How does that prepare him to brand himself as an expert in disinformation?
That is unclear. By the way, you know, if you look at University of Indiana, did you realize that in conservative Indiana where Mike Pence was governor and so forth, did you realize that associated with the University of Indiana is the McKinsey Institute?
And the sex perverts.
And do you realize that they brought a guy over from Italy to run the McKinsey sex pervert organization?
They're in conservative Indiana.
And then, after he was here doing that, at about that same time, 2017 or 2018, they moved that guy To an organization that was looking at social media and censorship.
It's called OSOME. You can look it up.
And they had a couple of different organizations that were associated with that newly formed group.
Run by this guy that was brought from Italy to run the sexual pervert institution there in conservative Indiana.
And they were the ones who produced, just before the 2018 midterm elections, they produced 90,000 people that I said needed to be taken off.
And we had about 800 organizations that were purged just before the 2018 midterm elections.
And of course, two months prior to that was when Infowars, and I was part of that, got purged off of social media pretty much everywhere.
The only place I wasn't purged off of for some reason was Twitter.
But got purged everywhere else as part of that.
And it was being pushed by that Oh So Me organization.
So again, just like this Paul Thatcher guy who is coming from the British Labor Party, what gives him the right to be the arbiter of truth?
Well, because he's a socialist, he's a big government person.
And where do they pull these people out from?
And now it makes perfectly good sense as to why they would pull somebody from the Kinsey Institute to run this stuff, because now the censorship also includes anybody who pushes back against their sexual agenda.
And it talks about traditional relationships and biological, objective, and binary sex.
His LinkedIn account, that is Paul Thacker, makes no mention of his work as a political operative in England, although his biography at the CCDH states that he is, quote, an authority on social and psychological malignancies on social media.
Well, I guess the guy who's running a sex institute knows all about psychological manipulation and malignancies, doesn't he?
I guess that's the qualification for the other guy as well.
So such things such as identity-based hate, you know, people that they hate because of who you are, Oh, you're a white person, or you're a straight male, or I hate you, right?
I'm going to shut you down. Disinformation and conspiracy theories.
Because, you know, conspiracy theory is questioning the government narrative.
Disinformation is opposing the government narrative.
You want to know what? That's what different disinformation conspiracy theories are.
It's anything that opposes the government.
You're with Putin, right?
As Trudeau said. In early 2021...
The CCDH posted a report titled, The Disinformation Doesn't.
Remember that? A lot of people.
RFK Jr. was on that.
12 different accounts. Elon Musk tweeted that stuff out and said, I can't wait to get them under deposition with this lawsuit.
We're going to find out a lot of stuff.
And so, you know, I don't agree with Elon Musk and his crony capitalism, but we'll talk about that coming up.
But he has done some good work in terms of exposing...
The documents to document what we all knew about the deputized state.
So kudos for that.
We'll not celebrate his other agendas that are there.
And of course, he still has his thumbnail, his Baphomet suit.
It's a real mixed bag, isn't he?
Uh, I'm not falling in line behind Elon Musk.
I'm just saying, you know, when somebody does something good, give them a thumbs up.
And that's a good, good job there.
Uh, college is now, one college is now paying students $10,000 to take a leave of absence.
As I've said many times, you could not pay me to go to college today, but you could pay me not to go.
This is in Vermont.
College of Vermont. It's experiencing an enrollment boom, and so they're offering the upperclassmen who got delayed because of the lockdown and other stuff a $10,000 stipend to avoid overcrowding.
Take a leave of absence here.
So, if you look at this, by the way, you've got 100-plus colleges that still, still Have a vaccine mandate.
Just absolutely amazing.
We'll be right back. Well,
I have a comment and a tip from Tyrannosaurus Radio.
Uh, thank you.
Uh, thank you very much.
And, uh, he says, uh, uh, David, I would love if you publish a list of Trump versus Biden programs that are basically the same, but with different names, such as smart cities versus freedom cities.
You seem to know the most about this stuff.
Uh, seem to know the most on this stuff.
Well, uh, that's a good idea.
I really should do that.
And you know, that's one of the things when I talked about that a great deal, when remember before we started pushing the vaccine, Trump is all about 5G. And I said, you understand what 5G is?
5G is the foundation for the smart cities.
And you should be very worried about this.
But of course, you know, everybody was told, well, we've got to be worried because the Chinese are going to...
We can't let them put the switching circuitry in.
We can't let Huawei put in the 5G network hardware.
Because if they do, then they're going to be scraping everything out.
They're going to know everything about us.
They're going to see the big board.
But, yeah, I said, well, okay, so they admit that the 5G stuff is going to be all about surveillance, but it's okay if they surveil you, quite frankly.
I know they don't want their secrets seen, but I don't have, there's nothing about my life that I care about the Chinese knowing.
I know the Chinese want to get the big data.
They have to have the compute database to train their AI, and that's what they're fighting over with all this stuff.
But again, you know, that was a telltale thing right at the very beginning.
And I said, you understand he's preparing you for the smart city stuff.
Just like the stimulus checks and things like that, the trillions of dollars that are spent on that, that's preparing you for universal basic income.
So, thank you for the tip and the suggestion.
And we'll take a look at that.
I'm going to talk, before we get Tony on at the bottom of the hour, I want to talk a little bit about some of the campaign stuff.
Coming up, we're also going to talk about some updates on climate.
They're getting very strident about this.
They're saying, you know, well, we've gone from global warming to global burning.
Boiling, I'm sorry, boiling.
Yeah, absolute nonsense.
They're cranking that up, and you've got energy executives who are, you know, and we're talking about energy executives, meaning the real stuff, the stuff you burn, the real stuff you burn.
They're saying, you know, they're going to put in a climate lockdown.
This is exactly the same they said as the COVID thing.
Yeah, it is a MacGuffin, and they're starting to realize this as well.
And speaking out about it, guess what?
You're not going to get out of that lockdown.
That's going to be permanent. You know, it isn't going to be anything that's ever going to end.
So we want to talk about that.
We want to talk about the car threats, the technological threats.
We got things like self-driving semi-trucks that they're putting out on the roads, and they're very eager to do that.
GMO plants that glow in the dark and all that stuff.
So a lot of different things. Even talking about, I want to talk about the UFO threats.
Stuff that's coming up here.
But let's talk real quickly about the campaign thing.
And of course, you see a lot of press out there, a lot of people who don't like DeSantis or whatever, or they love Trump.
And so, you know, they're now pushing Ramaswamy.
They made a big deal about the fact that, oh, look, we've got Nikki Haley came in in second place in South Carolina.
That was a poll that came out while I was gone.
She had 14%.
DeSantis had 13%.
I mean, the big issue is that Trump has got such a wide lead on everybody.
All the rest of the stuff is there in the noise.
And if you look at something that is a 1% difference, that's well within the margin of error.
But that's where Nikki Haley was governor.
So, I mean, you could put that headline out.
Look, she beat him by 14% to 13%.
But you could also say, look, she only beat him by 1% in the place where she was governor.
So they're pushing this. They're talking about Ramaswamy.
As a matter of fact, a really close friend, as I point out, at the wedding.
And again, I want to thank Gard for all the work that he did while we were gone.
Liberty Conspiracy is on Rockfin every night at 6 p.m.
So he's doing double duty for this entire last week.
So I really do appreciate that so that we could have time with our friends and family at my daughter's wedding.
And one of my very closest friends, we've been friends for decades, and his family came to the wedding.
And he was asking me, he said, you know, what do you think about Ramaswamy?
And I had just seen this article about the interview that he had with Musk.
And I said, do you realize...
That Ramaswamy wants to get us into the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the TPP thing.
And he thinks it was a mistake for Trump to take us out.
That's one of the few things that Trump did right.
He shut down the TPP thing.
And I said, and he also, he and Musk were saying how they wanted to escalate H-1B visas so that their corporations could get cheaper labor.
Oh, he said, oh, okay.
Well, take another look at him here.
Well, he was also very anxious to rewrite his CV. His vital curriculum, right?
His history. He paid people to go back and edit Wikipedia and take out the fact that he had a lot of money from Soros for his education.
Take out the fact that he was on Ohio's COVID response team or whatever, handpicked by Governor DeWine, who was the guy who Put out the $1 million lottery thing, you know, for if you get a vaccine, you get entered into a lottery.
Yeah, you sure do. It may not be the one that you think.
It might be the heart attack lottery or the blood clot lottery or many of these other adverse effects lotteries that could cripple you or kill you.
But yeah, we'll give you a million dollars, maybe.
Get your name in the hat if you put that stuff in your body.
I don't know if Ramaswamy had anything to do with that.
Governor DeWine, all these people who say, well, it's just the Democrat governors.
It wasn't Trump. It wasn't these Republican governors.
No. DeWine was one of the most conniving of the governors, and he was right there with him in that.
So he got that scrubbed off of Wikipedia.
He got the Soros connection scrubbed off of Wikipedia.
But there was something else about this.
And I guess, you know, the World Economic Forum saw that he was, you know, getting money from Soros for his education and saw that he was a COVID collaborator there in Ohio.
I guess they figured he was a Quisling.
That's kind of the way I see it.
A Quisling. That was what the people in Norway called people who collaborated with the Nazis.
You know, you had in France the occupied government.
That was the Vichy government. And in Norway, the guy who was running the occupied government, there was a Quisling.
That's now become... Associated with people who are collaborators with the enemy.
So he was labeled by the World Economic Forum as a young global leader.
And he said, wait a minute, I never endorsed you.
As a matter of fact, I wrote a book opposing your ESG stuff.
And you've created a false perception, quote-unquote, of affiliation by listing me as a young global leader.
He sued them. And they've now backed down.
He filed that lawsuit in April, about the same time I guess he was purging his...
This Wikipedia page. You know, you can always, they got a Wikipedia page and I don't have one, I don't want one.
You know, a lot of people, they hire somebody to put up a Wikipedia page for them.
And then somebody finds out who you are and they don't like you and they start putting all kinds of garbage out there about you.
And then you have to hire somebody to fight them and to, you know, keep editing your page.
I know people who have done that.
I won't mention any names here.
But anyway, I'm not interested in playing that game at all.
Incorrectly implied an association with the forum, and for that reason, the forum apologized for its unintentional error as a statement that he got from them as they settled with him.
He said he informed the group that he deeply disagreed with its values and declined their award, but he learned months later that he was included on the list.
Again, where would they get the idea?
This guy's on their side. He stated that he asked the organization to remove his name but went forward with a lawsuit after no action was taken.
In his New York Times bestselling book, Woke Incorporated, no, call it joke, call it joke, and these people are jokers, dangerous, demented, deranged villains with green hair and lipstick and weird places and all the rest of the stuff.
Yeah, the jokers.
But his book was called Woke Incorporated Inside Corporate America's Social Justice Scam.
He says, yes, I was a successful person in this country, and so they thought that they could use my name and image along with people like Mark Zuckerberg or others who they had named, Elon Musk, that they had named in the past, he said, but I wasn't going to let them get away with that.
And so, good, he's opposing the ESG stuff, and he's been good in terms of his opposition.
I'm not saying that, and again, you know, the jury is still out as to what he did in collaboration in Ohio.
But, you know, when he's now in this interview with Musk, that was a pretty damning interview, frankly.
He touts the Pacific trade deal.
He urges more migration, as the article from Breitbart.
He told Elon Musk on an interview that they did on Twitter on Friday.
That Trump made a, quote, poor decision by exiting the Pacific region free trade treaty.
Now, that was one of his few good decisions.
He said, I think we should reenter it.
He told Musk about 94 minutes in the conversation.
He said, the course of action taken by Trump in exiting the TPP, I think that was actually a poor decision.
About 20 minutes in the conversation, he also argued for more migration after Musk called for more migration.
But before we leave the TPP, do you really understand the importance of this?
I said as all this was being pushed in the Obama administration, I would tell people frequently, you understand that you have economic consolidation, and then that eventually transforms into political consolidation.
And so the purpose of the TPP, and of course there was a Trans-Pacific Partnership and there was a Trans-Atlantic Partnership as well.
There was one that was going to be done with Europe as well.
And what was the spine on that?
The United States was the connecting link.
Because we've become kind of the center for this globalism.
And so if you think about it, you know, it's like this caterpillar who turns into a butterfly, the two wings that are there.
The U.S. would be the common thing that both of these wings are tied to.
And you put them all out there, and you've got a trilateral commission, essentially.
That was what Zbigniew Brzezinski was pushing back in the 1970s, 50 years ago.
He saw three different groups, you know, Asia, Europe, and then the United States.
All three of these have to be united to create a world government.
He wrote a book Between Two Ages.
He talked about the coming technocratic age.
He said, we're going to know what you want to do before you do it.
He talked about all of this stuff 50 years ago.
He began the Trilateral Commission.
Based on that book, based on his trilateral views, he was put in by the real power in government to essentially be the one in charge during the Carter administration, just like Kissinger was with Nixon.
And of course, he's still around in the form of Mika Brzezinski, his daughter, on MSNBC with Joe Scarborough.
But yeah, that is the plan for globalism.
You consolidate things in these regions, and then you consolidate the regions.
You consolidate these three different regions, as we've seen, especially in Europe.
The consolidation in Asia, it's going to be China, and then subsuming these other Asian economies.
And then you unify all that with the United States, and you wind up with a global government.
That was the plan. Ramaswamy likes that.
He thinks that's a good idea.
He thinks globalism is a good idea.
He's not on our team. About 20 minutes in the conversation, they talked about more immigration.
He and Musk agreed. Musk called for more migration and Ramaswamy said, I agree with that.
I actually fully agree with that.
And that's one of the things where I think the Republican Party needs to define where we actually stand.
There is an anti-legal immigration current.
I'm going to be on the debate stage in a month.
And if anybody has any qualms with this, I think I'm going to have a real problem with that because merit-based immigration is one of the fixes to the economic growth in this country.
And again, notice that we talk about this.
Notice that everything from the perspective of these billionaires, well, I don't think Ramaswamy is a centimillionaire.
He's got hundreds of millions of dollars as his net worth, but he's not quite at a billion.
But, you know, get him over the top with what he's doing now.
That'll make him a billionaire, for sure.
Especially if he gets elected.
But notice that everything that they're doing here is not really talking about how do we propagate the values of America, but how do we make money off of this stuff?
Merit-based immigration.
Not people who share our values.
If they just come in here and if they're hot shots with computer coding or something, we want them in here.
I don't care if they're Marxist or whatever.
How do you think we gut the kinds of Silicon Valley companies that we have?
That are pushing these anti-American values.
This is with the H-1B visa programs.
These people, they may be technically proficient.
But as I've said over and over again, the key thing about education is not whether or not you can program.
The key value of education is what is your moral foundation?
What are your values?
What are your ethics?
This is what we need to be looking for with immigration.
To get that right, the other stuff is going to follow.
If you've got good values, you're going to be a good worker.
You're going to be a hard worker.
You're going to be diligent.
But, you know, hey, you can always bring in hot shots who will stab you in the back and steal from you.
And that's what we've got in Silicon Valley, isn't it?
That culture, that culture is what's represented in this discussion between Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy.
Merit-based immigration, the inflow of foreign graduates into well-paid white-collar careers, That would have gone to American graduates.
So that's one aspect of it.
And again, Breitbart is also looking at it strictly from an economic standpoint.
Because nobody cares about morals and ethics or about our societal values that we've had historically.
Did you notice in the founders' writings, you know, certainly they were not opposed to prosperity.
But that wasn't the only thing that they talked about.
They were focused on liberty, not on prosperity.
They were focused on propagating those values.
They're focused on propagating virtue as well.
When they talk about the pursuit of happiness, they're talking about the pursuit of virtue.
It's just, you know, our terminology changes its meaning over a couple of centuries.
Breitbart says, That he would use the GOP candidates' debates to go after Ron DeSantis, who was challenging the government's use of migration to aid companies and investors.
In May, DeSantis said, quote, But when you're doing immigration, it's not for their benefit as foreigners.
It's for your benefit as Americans.
So if there's legal immigration that is harming Americans, we shouldn't do that either.
For example, DeSantis said some of these H-1B visas, they would fire American tech workers and hire foreigners at lower wages.
And I don't agree with that. I think it's wrong.
Well, it's already been happening. It's been happening a great deal.
And it's not just in the tech industry.
It's especially in the tech industry.
That's why I said, that's why we've got these monstrous anti-American corporations run by people who don't embrace American values.
They weren't raised on them.
And they bring in people who are just coming for the money.
And quite frankly, I don't regard them with any more respect than I do the people who come across the border looking for a free welfare ride.
If you come here looking for freedom, fine.
And part of that freedom is success and financial success.
Fine. But that's not the only thing that's involved there.
We've seen this happen with Disney.
Disney brought in a bunch of people and fired a bunch of Americans because they could bring them in cheaper.
And so Musk, who's an immigrant from South Africa, And Ramaswamy, whose parents were immigrants, and it's not clear to me as to whether or not, I don't know if his parents were citizens of the time that he was born or not.
That would be a disqualifying thing.
I've got it in here somewhere.
I forget what I wrote down.
It is an open question with Nikki Haley, for example, as to whether or not she's an American citizen and whether or not, at the time she was born, whether her parents were American citizens.
The way the 14th Amendment reads, I think it's very clear.
And I think it was a disqualifying condition for both Ted Cruz and for Marco Rubio, that even though they were born here, their parents were not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
And according to the 14th Amendment, that means they're treated the same as if their parents were here as visiting ambassadors or something like that.
They're not citizens.
But anyway, getting back to the immigration issue and the economic issues, Musk said, and he gives a corporate analogy, he gives a pro-sports corporate analogy to all of this stuff.
And when I looked at this, oh, you're going to talk about getting people on your team, right?
You know, one of the things about the crony capitalism that we've seen for these billionaires is the fact that you have these billionaires who own these sports teams, and we get to pay all the taxes to build their stadium.
They don't invest in that.
And so we pay the taxes to build that, just like we pay Elon Musk for his corporate, you know, for his business ventures that he sells stuff to the government, gives them exactly what they want.
And so they give him money for SpaceX and they give him money for the EVs and all the rest of this stuff.
But, you know, when you look at these subsidies for these sports stadiums, these billionaires...
Get billion-dollar stadiums given to them so they can have multimillionaires go around and play a kid's sport.
That's what this is all about. So that's the analogy, of course, that Elon Musk uses.
He says, I want to say it in a way that everybody can understand it.
Imagine that America is a pro sports team, and we want to win the championship, and we want to keep winning the championship.
And there's some ace players on another team, and they really want to join our team, and now we can make them fight us, or we can have them join our team and crush the champions.
And I think if ace players want to join our team, then please do.
This is the way to continue success.
We should welcome them.
Not have all these ridiculous immigration obstacles.
Well, again, they don't need to have American citizenship in order to work for his corporation.
He's got a multinational corporation.
All these corporations are multinationals.
They can stay where they are.
They don't have to be American citizens if they don't want our values.
And again, what is the game here?
He says, well, it's like a pro sports team.
Well, I know what game you're playing, if you're playing football or basketball or soccer or something like that, but what's the game here?
What is the game? Are we trying to create a country where people can live and freedom?
Is that what the game is?
Exactly, said Ramaswamy when Musk said that.
He said, I think part of the reason you have this reaction, we've got somebody who doesn't even want to sign up for the team just gets to show up on the field.
And that's what we have now, which creates a backlash from the existing team members to say, we don't want any more.
In fact, what we should be saying is we want the best ones who come and follow the process for actually training and joining the team.
And that's what I think merit-based legal immigration ought to be about.
Well, that sounds great, doesn't it?
Except here's the deal. Both Ramaswamy and Musk went on to say, but you know what we need to have the government do?
The government needs to protect our corporations.
That's what the government needs to do.
So the government should not do anything to protect American labor, but it should protect our corporations.
So they want to be protected by the government for that.
But then they want to be able to hire people as cheaply as they can, and to take down the wages as much as they can, and to bring in people and make them citizens who actually despise our values, as we see over and over again in Silicon Valley.
Who's running these woke corporations, Ramaswamy?
It's people who have come here who hate our values.
They're Marxists. They don't want our values.
And they bring in more people like them, and then they pay them the highest salaries.
And they wind up taking over the most beautiful states, whether you're talking about Oregon or Washington or California or whatever, in the process of buying up everything everywhere.
Ramaswamy argued that the U.S. government should use its negotiating power to protect U.S. employers, not employees, and U.S. investors from foreign competition.
Protection for me, not for thee, right?
We've got to have no more forced intellectual property transfers.
We've got to effectively having this nice little political condition to be able to get domestic license to do business and so forth.
If you're BlackRock and you're selling mutual funds in China, make sure that you don't apply the same standards to the Chinese companies that you apply to the American ones.
He argued against political pressure on Wall Street investors as well.
He said, we've had decades of losses that have been caused.
I'm sorry, this is a comment from Breitbart.
What they're missing here is really what he's saying.
You know, he goes on to talk about what I was saying earlier.
And that is, what are the core values of America?
They eventually get back to that.
I mean, they're talking about, well, we want to make a lot of money and we have the government to protect our investments and protect our companies, but we want to be able to hire cheaper people because it's all really about profits.
And then Breitbart comes into that and says, well, you know, we've had a lot of losses in our society.
Our society has economically suffered because of this.
Ramaswamy goes on and says, well, we're like a bunch of blind bats flying around in a cave trying to figure out where we are.
He said, we put out our sonar signals, and they bounce back, and we say, well, here's where I am.
I'm blind. I can't see where I am, but I get this bounce back, and this signal could be a bounce back from my family.
It could be grounding on the fact that I'm a citizen of this nation, or it could be my faith that I believe in God because I'm a person of this faith.
I've had a lot of people, I've seen articles where people say, well, Rama Swami is a Christian.
No, he's a Hindu. I don't know anything about his faith.
I don't know about his gods.
I do know that in India, when we talked about Modi coming, that the Hindu Nationalist Party there is killing Christians and killing Muslims.
And the Muslims protest that, the Christians didn't in Congress.
And of course, in Muslim countries, the Muslims kill Hindus and the Christians.
I want to have a Christian value that's here.
They take advantage of our tolerance.
And they use that against us.
But anyway, as he talks about this, he does get back to the point of view that is about that.
And he's had interviews with Alex Newman at The New American.
And he said all the right things with Alex Newman, but they only scratched the surface.
Because understand, this is a guy who likes foreigners taking our jobs, but he doesn't like foreign competition for his companies or for his intellectual properties.
This is a guy who portrays himself as an anti-world economic form guy, as an anti-globalist, but he loves a trans-Pacific partnership.
And that is a backdoor trap to all of this stuff.
Again, a mixed bag.
His citizens, here it is, his parents were citizens of India at his birth, reportedly.
So again, you know, they said, well, we'd like to get, and that was reported by the New America.
They said, we'd like to get a more in-depth interview with him.
Well, if you do, ask him about TPP. Ask him about immigration.
Ask him about what he did with the wine as part of this COVID conspiracy.
We're going to take a quick break.
Tony Arterburn is going to join us, and we're going to talk about what is happening economically.
Stay with us.
We will be right back.
The Common Man.
The Common Man.
They created common core to dumb down our children.
They created common past to track and control us.
Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
And the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
Thank you for sharing.
Thank you.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
The Davis TheDavidKnightShow.com All right, joining us now is Tony Arterbin of Wise Wolf Gold, and Tony has kindly set up davidknight.gold to take you there.
Let him know that you are coming as a listener of The David Knight Show.
And there's a lot of stuff that's happening, isn't there, Tony?
We've got some important dates that are coming up, don't we?
It's exactly 19 days out until the meeting of the BRICS nations in Johannesburg, South Africa, which if the dollar is dying by a death of a thousand cuts, this is going to be a gash.
It's not going to be a mortal wound, but I think there's going to be some important news that comes out of this in regards to their currency they're setting up.
Yeah, that's really been building, hasn't it?
And, you know, just this last week, we've seen a couple of things.
One of the ones that is kind of interesting, I think, in terms of what is happening domestically is this Fitch rating, taking the U.S. down from AAA to AA or whatever, AA +, or whatever it is.
But they demoted our ratings, and that really sent a shock through the stock market, didn't it?
Absolutely did. And it's interesting, the same entities that rate our credit scores had their credit scores demoted, which I thought was interesting.
And, you know, I think this is all part of the system.
I mean, we have overvalued stocks.
We've had since the 90s, as you know, David.
I mean, we've built an economy based on fake and based on nothing.
It's not even based on earnings anymore.
I remember when I was a kid...
My dad had a gasoline business and a convenience store business, and he said, son, if my company was valued like these companies at 100 times earnings, I'd be a billionaire.
It's ridiculous, and I've known that since I was young.
I look at all of this as fake.
As a matter of fact, if you look through all of the writings on Wise Wolf or any of the websites, you'll not see the word investing because it's very hard to find anything to invest in anymore.
We're We're living in so much fake.
I don't really own any stocks.
I don't have any of that because it's really not a safe haven anymore.
Yeah, it's not just a casino where these guys have set up the house rules to make sure they win.
But it is also, as you point out, it's really kind of the greater fool.
If you've got a stock and you buy this stock and it is priced at a price-to-earnings ratio of $100,000, That means that you've got to hold it at the current rate that they're getting dividends or earnings.
You've got to hold it for 100 years in order to get your money back.
Well, nobody's going to do that. And so you're going to just flip that over and sell it to somebody else.
So we saw that happening with Moderna.
For a decade, they existed just with happy stories on Wall Street.
Every time they needed some more money, they would hold a big press conference on Wall Street and tell everybody about some promising new drug that they haven't tested yet to see if it works.
But we think it's going to be great.
You know, this is our strategy.
Never had anything until you had the Operation Warp Speed.
It was always just topium.
And they could put out these happy stories about this miracle mRNA drug that's coming down the pipeline.
And they could make tons of money off of that stuff.
And, of course, once Mansef Slaoui became head of the Operation Warp Speed, people said, well, you've got to divest your stocks.
And, of course, he was happy to do that because the stock shot straight up.
Everybody knew he was going to recommend his own company.
And so he said, well, okay, sure, I'll sell all that stuff.
He sold it for a big profit, like $10 million or something, and then immediately lost like 70% of its value the next day.
I mean, the whole thing is rigged every different direction, isn't it?
Yeah, golden parachutes built into the system.
You look at the end of 2019, it was the largest exodus of CEOs in history.
Yeah. You know, these multinational corporations.
Why was that? What was on the horizon in 2020?
I think a lot of these intelligence agencies know, and they're connected to finance and these big corporations.
But, you know, Goldman Sachs even put out, I follow a little bit of what Goldman Sachs says, but they said there will be no returns on stocks in 2023 at this point.
So, I mean, it's a rigged system and we're seeing this, I think, come apart at the seams with the loss of the reserve currency status of the dollar.
That's what I keep paying attention to because that is, it's huge.
I mean, we're living through history right now.
And the average person, the average citizen of the United States has no idea the gravity of that.
Losing that reserve status is going to change our way of life so drastically.
Really, we've never had that happen to us.
We've never lost the status before we became the world's reserve currency in 1944 after Bretton Woods.
You know, Nixon took us off the gold standard in 71.
We decoupled from value.
Gold was $35 an ounce.
At the end of the 70s, it was close to $800 an ounce.
It's not because gold went up.
It's because of the loss of purchasing power.
Kissinger pegged it to oil, to Saudi oil.
The petrodollar was born.
But now we're losing that, too.
So there's a massive change coming.
And again, I don't think the BRICS meeting in 19 days is going to...
Take off, you know, this huge wave of loss of purchasing power, but it is a signpost on the road ahead of what's to come, and I think that's what I want to keep talking about.
Yeah, yeah. I saw an article where somebody was talking about the fact that, you know, bonds have taken a big hit because of the interest to, you know, people who bought the bonds a couple of years ago got them at a very, very small interest rate.
1% or less, typically.
And now the Fed, through these rapid increases in interest rates, and this is what got the banks in trouble, they started raising the interest rates so quickly, the banks couldn't cover their losses on the bonds.
Well, China's got massive holdings in these bonds that are now, you know, really, really marked down because they're at a low interest rate, so you mark down their face value to get the The return up to what the current paying interest rate is if somebody were to go out and get a new issue.
But they're still dumping them.
They're not hanging on to them. They're dumping them and they're buying gold.
And the calculation is they look at this and say, well, gold is even more undervalued.
And so, you know, gold is still on sale.
And that's the calculation that the Chinese are making.
They want to get out of the dollar, get out of these bonds that they've got and jump into gold because it's still really undervalued.
The Chinese have been very patient.
They've seen the United States ride that wave of Nixon taking us off the gold standard and giving away all you talked about tariffs at the beginning of the show.
We gave away our manufacturing base.
We gave away our technology.
We pawned the soul of America, to quote Pat Buchanan.
And you look at what happened through the '90s, there was this creation of fake wealth through the stock market, and these companies had massive earnings.
But if you look at the wages of Americans, they stayed flat or they went down.
And we, of course, the loss of the purchasing power.
China sees the writing on the wall and they're buying gold cheap because the dollar...
Again, I said this last week when I was on with Guard, the only central bank in the world not buying gold right now is the United States of America, the Federal Reserve Bank.
I mean, if you want to call that our bank, it's not ours, but the Federal Reserve isn't buying gold.
And the reason is because the dollar is at war with value.
It's at war with gold. These other countries know that.
It's one of the reasons why the BRICS, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, it's why it's so important.
They're 40% of the world's population.
They've been a net buyer of gold, these countries, since 2008, 2009.
And again, this is a shift in global value, de-dollarization, and gold resetting in value.
Other countries have a vested interest in gold reclaiming its reserve currency status or some kind of monetary base, and the United States does not.
So these two things, they can't exist in the same space.
Eventually, something's got to give.
Yeah. You're talking about the stock market and how they...
The re-rating of America, and of course one of the things they said with that, Tony, was, these were the headlines that I saw, and actually CNN contradicted its own headlines.
They said, well, it's in the body of their text.
They said, well, this is all the response to January the 6th.
It's like, really? You know, two and a half years later, this is their response?
You know, January the 6th, so we're going to derate America because it's no longer stable or something like that.
And then in the body, they have a quote from somebody who said, this doesn't have anything to do with January the 6th.
I mean, it was pretty funny, but that's CNN, of course.
But when you look at it, it's always, Trump was always pushing as the metric of success.
What's the stock market doing, right?
That's what they all do. They all talk about the stock market as if it were the metric of success.
And you look at what a narrow, distorted view that is, and I think especially when we talk about WorldCoin and its connections with artificial intelligence and the CEO who's in both of these, Sam Altman, you've got... There's a massive bubble that many of the banks have been talking about.
J.P. Morgan, Bank of America have said, you know, this stock market bubble, everything is down except for artificial intelligence.
It's like, what happens when people realize that AI isn't what they've been buying into, or when they get disillusioned because it isn't happening as quickly as they wanted it to?
Because that's what happened with the dot-com bust, you know?
The internet was real, it was going to be a big thing, and people were going to make lots of money off of it.
But the timing wasn't as quick as the market wanted, and so that's one of the reasons why they engineered that bubble burst.
And of course, these people who are in control of the markets, they make money when it goes up, and they make money when it goes down.
They don't make any money when it goes sideways.
So they want it to have radical changes in one direction or the other.
I think this little hiccup that they had over the bond rating is just a prelude to what's going to happen with the AI bubble when it bursts, I think.
I believe it'll be engineered.
I mean, you look at the crash of 1907, that was completely engineered to usher in the Federal Reserve.
If you'll just let us take over, if you'll just let us, we can control the economy, we can do better, we can control the money supply.
There's too many of these smaller banks writing notes, and that's what the 1907 panic was all about.
You're talking about the dot-com bust.
What happened after that, David?
Massive consolidation.
Always when there's an engineered crisis and there's a crash, there's always consolidation.
After 2008, it was too big to fail and too big to jail.
You had the TARP funds and you had Bernanke came out and said, don't worry, we'll never do that again.
Well, yeah, you did. I mean, it's like 80% of the dollars ever created in the last four years.
And so, no, I think we're headed towards something like that.
It'll be engineered. You know, you talked about WorldCoin.
And it's funny, you have a guy named, how perfect, he creates ChatGPT.
His name is Sam Altman.
And you have another Sam, FTX, called Sam Bankman.
And he was fried. Sam Bankman fried.
The tale of the two Sams.
And I was reading this.
I'm like, who is going to...
Apparently, there's people signing up for WorldCoin.
And it's like one of those backdoor things where it's like, oh, it's a public-private partnership.
Imagine that.
There's an article up on technocracy.news, Patrick Wood's website, and he's talking about how governments are aligning with WorldCoin.
We could help.
We could work together.
You can give this biometric information of your users and we can link this up, which is what this is for.
And again, it's using what appears to be the free market decentralization and a wonderful tool.
I think cryptocurrency is a wonderful tool.
It's not everything, but I think it's part of the solution.
to building a parallel economy.
And it really just ruins it.
I mean, it takes it and it uses the best parts of it and inverts it, which is kind of what evil does, doesn't it?
Yeah, it's what they do in our government all the time.
You know, they take something like FISA and they completely turn it upside down.
They use it as something that was meant to prevent the spy agencies from spying on Americans, and they use it to give themselves permission to spy on Americans.
You know, they turn everything inside down, upside down.
And so, you know, as you talk about how it'll be engineered, it'll be very easy for them to engineer it.
Because since there's nothing real at the basis of this stuff, all you have to do is essentially start a whispering campaign.
And they don't even have to whisper.
They can shout it with a megaphone through the media that they control.
And once you start having these people start putting out stories and saying, well, you know, I don't know, this artificial intelligence, it just isn't delivering things as rapidly as we thought.
Maybe we need to rethink this.
Maybe this isn't quite ready and so forth.
That's going to be a run for the exit at that point in time.
And that's going to be a very powerful economic move.
But I think the aspect that you're talking about when we talk about world coin, it's got so many things that are tied up in it.
Universal basic income, a universal global ID. And of course, on the surface of it, it's all Marxist.
You know, the idea is this is going to be a coin of the people, says Sam Altman, right?
It's going to be a coin of the people, and we're all going to have a share in it, except you're looking like not all the animals on Animal Farm are equal, as I said yesterday.
They wind up, at first they said, we're going to take 20% of it.
Now they're saying, we're going to own 25% of it.
That's the kind of public-private partnership that we call Marxism.
And that's what these guys are putting.
So it's a Marxist, universal basic income, biometric global ID coin.
What could possibly go wrong?
Well, again, it's going back.
You talk about this a lot with the technocracy movement from the 30s.
That's what these people are.
I mean, yeah, a mixture of socialism, communism, but it's really about a one-world totalitarian socialist government.
I mean, that's all it is, using technology to control people.
And this really tracks back to the World Economic Forum and Yuval Harari and I mean, he's echoing Kissinger with, you know, useless eaters and what do we do with all these people?
That's the basis of UBI. I talked about this on my show last week and I said, you know, God made us to create.
We're created in his image to make things, to strive, to be better, to, you know, leave our legacy.
We're not meant to just sit back and be consumers and be given something from daddy government.
I mean, it's really a soul-killing thing.
I mean, it's really a spiritual, isn't it?
A spiritual to create and to go and do something with your life.
It doesn't mean you have to be on a podcast or famous, or it doesn't mean you have to be rich.
It just means do something.
And we've got a spirit in this age, and I see it in younger people.
Luckily, my son is not falling for that, but I see a lot of younger people.
It's just... Giving up before you even start.
That's where this is a culture of.
We have to usher in...
I saw a post the other day.
It was like the robots are creating poetry and art and the people are doing the meaningless jobs.
That's not the future I was told it was going to happen.
You have the slave class creating all these service things and the robots are doing the art.
That's really the The downside, the evil of AI. I still haven't, by the way, and I don't discount technology, but I still haven't found a use for AI. I'm still trying to figure out what it's for, other than just completely hijacking You're going to let AI invest for you?
I thought we saw this movie when I was a kid.
James Cameron did two of them.
It's called Terminator. You're not supposed to let Skynet take over the defense industry or entertainment or anything.
It's really scary, but everything is ramping up.
It's accelerating, isn't it, sir?
Yeah. And it's not just the art, you know?
I mean, when you look at the fundamental stuff, whatever else they use AI for.
When I went there, I started asking political questions.
I started asking questions about vaccines and climate and other things like that.
And of course, it gave me all the pat narrative answers and the real danger We're good to go.
And it was an absolute piece of trash.
You know, we saw that it didn't have, as part of its model, it didn't even have Farr's Law, where you have a bell curve.
Everybody was going to give it to two and a half other people forever.
And then it wasn't implemented right.
And so we're seeing the same type of stuff happening with this.
But now they're going to cut out the middleman.
They're going to cut out the Anthony fascist.
So that you're not going to be able to have the ad hominem attacks like Rand Paul does.
You're not even going to have that.
You're just going to have this straight from the source of the computer talking directly to you.
And people are just going to bow down and worship this.
And these people are setting up all of the same biases.
And it's naked in terms of, you know, what the garbage of this thing is spewing out.
But people are going to fall for this.
The younger generation is going to fall hook, line, and sinker for this.
That's where I see the real danger. Well, yeah.
You mentioned earlier in the show about the human mind is an idol factory.
We just create idols. We're looking for a savior, looking for something, looking for a god to worship, a false god at that.
And this AI is part of that.
And it's part of the future.
It's part of, I think, the spirit of the age.
It's part of our zeitgeist and what we're supposed to resist.
And so I look at it as a technology that It really exposes itself for its biases and everything else.
If you look at it, you talk to it politically, it's built into the algorithm.
But again, I still can't find a use for it other than controlling people, other than nefarious.
And I'm all about using something if it helps mankind, but I see no use for this.
There's an episode of The Twilight Zone where there's a computer in a cave and the guy goes and talks to it and tells him what to do and how to get fresh water after a nuclear annihilation and You know, the episode doesn't end well, but there's supposed to be this benevolent AI that lives in a cave and it's inside of a computer.
I don't think that's how that's really going to work.
You know, there's nothing more anti-Christ, in my opinion, than a cold-calculating AI. I mean, the opposite of Christ isn't necessarily the devil, per se.
It's something without feeling.
It's something without soul.
And so, that's the total opposite.
that's what they're building and i think these technocrats they they don't really have an atheistic standpoint in my opinion i see them as a totally different religion you know they are they worship uh scientism or something like that which really leads to luciferianism in my opinion that's right you know i i was uh we're talking last night um i was talking with my sons about uh this uh new buzz about a super conductor with the lk99
And I'm going to talk about that in a little bit coming up here.
But, you know, when you look at technology, I said, really, what we were warned about from Eisenhower in terms of the military-industrial complex, and he also made part of it the academic...
saying the government was going to take over all research and technology and all that kind of stuff.
Well, they've done that a long time ago.
And what are they doing now?
They're taking every new technological innovation, and they're looking to see how they can use it to dominate us and to control us and to watch us.
Every piece of new technology, every breakthrough, what they start imagining is, well, how can we use this to further our power over other people?
And that's the really disturbing thing about this.
I used to, I got into engineering because I saw technology as a freeing thing.
And at the time, it was.
You know, we had the mainframe centralized computers, and it was a very oppressive thing to have to use those.
And so I was real excited about personal computers that would sit there and wait on me, you know, instead of me doing that with the mainframe computers, which I had had that experience in college.
But they've been able to turn that around.
Your individual cell phone is not really something that is serving you.
It's serving the government.
It's surveilling and controlling you, and it'll be even more controlling as the IRS is going to be using it to create a paperless taxing system.
Everything that they're doing is designed along those lines, isn't it?
It's just amazing. It's what's referred to as the stalled century that we're in.
You know, if you go back, and again, it's debatable.
I don't know what happened. I met Gene Cernan, the last man to walk on the moon.
I don't know anymore because we haven't gone back, but for some reason we keep talking about it.
It never happens. The only technology we created is now I walk around with the monolith from 2001 Space Odyssey.
It's giving off EMF radiation and everything else and tracking me and tracing me and distracting me.
I don't think I'm smarter or better because of my phone.
The technology that's happened is really meant to keep us looking down and not dreaming and not doing anything with our own lives and becoming more of a collective hive.
I think that's technocracy 101.
That's right. Yeah. You talk about the moon thing.
I'm going to be talking about UFOs as well when we come up here and some of the narratives coming out of it.
But I just saw an article, and they were saying the European Space Agency is talking, well, we've got to put some people up and, you know, launch them up into space.
And so we've got to start thinking about, you know, hygiene, because you can't, you know, wash your underwear and things like that, right?
When you're up there, that's like...
Well, why didn't they think about that?
Why wasn't that an issue before?
Why was it that we were able to go to the moon and all the rest of the stuff?
But we haven't been able to do that for 60 years.
You know, the more, the longer this goes and the more you see stuff like that, the more it's like, I don't know.
I frankly don't believe it anymore.
I just, another one of these deals, especially when I look at UFO stuff.
No, it doesn't. It doesn't at all.
I mean, we just passed the anniversary.
Yeah. And it goes without, I mean, there's like one outlet I saw that even talked about it.
Yeah. And so, I mean, there's something weird about it.
I don't know exactly what it is, but, you know, now we've got, I'm going to talk about UFOs.
That's a whole other thing that's happening as part of this Great Reset PSYOP, in my opinion.
There's other things that distract us from what's really important.
The world is changing.
I mean, geopolitics, I mean, aside, we've got changing culture, changing economic conditions all across the board, and it's going to be a wild ride.
And they're going to be changing everything all at once.
And so we go back to what has historically been there.
You know, we go back to our traditional things at work.
And of course, one of those things has always been gold and silver.
You know, the real stuff.
We've got to get back to reality.
They're trying to sell us a virtual world, and we've got to get back to reality.
Tell us a little bit about what's going on there at Wise Wolf.
You can thank Gerald Ford for that.
It was illegal to own gold after April 1933 because the FDR signed that executive order and Gerald Ford reversed that because Nixon had taken us off the gold standard.
There was a lot of people that wanted to own gold and the United States wasn't really in the gold business anymore so we started to allow citizens to own it.
That's a good thing. Now you can privately own gold and silver.
There's no counterparty risk.
You can own physical gold.
One of the things that We're doing that I think is different than most other outlets as we created the Wolfpack.
And if you go to davidknight.gold, there's a tab on the website that says join Wolfpack.
Go look at that.
If you haven't joined... We're building a community, really, where the purchasing power of everyone allows me to go and find great deals.
We're buying into some amazing coins, David.
I'm getting fractional silver, fractional gold every week.
A monster box is what you call 500 ounces of silver.
I'm buying monster boxes at a time of different government sovereign coins like South African Krugerrands.
I'm really looking at some of the things the BRICS nations are doing, especially South Africa.
I'm putting those into the wolf pack.
We just launched Wolf Cub, which is $35 a month.
So we had the...
Lone Wolf Package, which was our lowest, but Wolf Cub is really for kids and young people.
And you can, we even added the one-time buy tab on all of the tiers.
So if you don't feel like you can join or maybe you wanna have an extra package a month, you can do a one-time purchase.
So yeah, we've got Wolf Cub.
We've got Zen Wolf.
This is about to come out and that's going to be our premium package.
We'll customize your invoice for you.
We can create ratios of gold and silver for that particular tier.
And so there's so much going on there.
It just allows anybody that That feels like they've not been able to save or they don't have enough capital to buy gold and silver.
We made it possible for the people to do that.
I know a lot of these online places, you call them, and I experienced that.
You don't have thousands and thousands of dollars.
They don't want to talk to you.
We do. We don't have a minimum.
And that's always going to be true for Wise Wolf as long as I'm the owner.
Yeah. Well, that's great.
And that's the key thing about saving or doing anything, you know, doing it a little bit at a time.
I've talked to people about, well, you know, what about prepping?
What about doing organic gardening and anything?
So the problem that people make is they try to do everything all at once.
You do it a little bit at a time and you build gradually.
And so that's what Wolfpack does.
It's great that you're setting up both a community buying group I really like what you're doing.
It's great. It's great dealing with you.
Thank you so much, Tony, for what you do for us here with the show.
I can't recommend Tony enough to all of you who are thinking about getting out of the system.
Again, this isn't even about the economic issues.
There's a lot of stuff like that that are harbingers on the horizon.
But the real harbinger is the kind of stuff that you're seeing with the global control and surveillance.
We've got to get out of this system.
You've got to have some way that you can, as much as you can, that you can get out of this system and prepare yourself.
And on the financial side, that's really gold and silver, I think.
And so that's a key part of it.
Anything else you want to tell us about what's happening at Weiswolf?
I would say, too, that we're continuing the free silver dollar promotion.
That'll be lone wolf and above.
Anybody that joins or upgrades in Wolfpack, if you just list David Knight, I think I've got like 30 left.
We've been giving away silver dollars.
And that's just a thank you to everyone who joins.
And again, the more people that come into Wolfpack, The better deals I can get everyone else.
So we're just really thankful for your audience, and we're going to continue to grow.
Again, we've got a lot of challenges on the horizon, but I'm not a defeatist.
I'm not blackpilled. I think we've got a monumental struggle ahead, but we're building a community, and I think that's what we're supposed to do.
That's the key thing. That's the key thing.
Building a community and preparing for yourself, but also, as I said earlier in the program, Our foundation is God, and so it isn't an option for us to quit.
We move on, and we know how the story ends.
And so there may be some things in the way, but we're not concerned about that either.
So yeah, we're not as Christians.
We're never black-pilled.
So it's always great talking to you, Tony.
Thank you for what you do and a great program there with Wise Wolf and the Wolf Pack.
And again, you can get there with davidknight.gold.
And thank you for putting out that bonus of the free silver dollar there for people who sign up as listeners of the program.
Thank you so much. Thank you, David.
Have a great day, Tony.
We're going to be right back and we're going to talk about some of these things in terms of the tech threats and UFO and climate and all the rest of the stuff.
We'll be right back. You're
listening to The David Knight Show.
It's true. The crown has made it clear.
The climate must be perfect all the year.
A law was made a distant moon ago here.
July and August cannot be too hot.
And there's a legal limit to the snow here.
In Camelot.
The winter is forbidden till December, and exits March the 2nd on the dot.
By order, summer lingers through September in Camelot.
Yeah, by order, the climate must be perfect.
It's got to exit on the dot.
We've got to have the seasons that are not too extreme, and of course, even Lerner and Lowe confused climate with weather.
And that's what everybody is doing, isn't it?
But that is the world in which we live.
And who knows, you know, if R.K. Jr.
gets elected president, he would probably try to put out orders about what the weather is going to be, because that's basically where he lives with this.
But this all began in terms of how they sold this.
Let me just put it this way. The environmentalism was sold to us In the 1970s, based on pollution.
We're going to clean up pollution.
But we also, if you're paying attention, you knew that the foundation of Earth Day and all these other things were based on these Malthusian prophecies of people like Paul Ehrlich and his population bomb and all the rest of this stuff.
So it was fundamentally about depopulation.
We've got to get rid of people so we can save the planet.
But they sold it to people as pollution.
And so I thought it was kind of interesting to see CNN... Saying that Paris is going to bring back swimming in the Seine River after 100 years.
So now, if you go to the Olympics in Paris, you'll be able to go insane.
And these climate people are insane, aren't they?
But the question I had was, why did these people in Paris wait 100 years to clean up their river?
If they can clean up the river for the Olympics, why didn't they bother to do it?
They said when the French capital hosted its first Olympic Games in 1900, swimming competitions took place in the river.
Parisians used to bathe in the Seine in centuries past until they banned it in 1923 because the pollution was so bad.
So why didn't they fix it?
And it's especially an interesting question for Paris when you consider the fact that their Marxist mayor was the first one to implement 15-minute city things in Paris.
First one to do it. They've been a pioneer in all of that.
So here they have this pollution in their river, the main river that runs through the city.
It's so filthy that You can't get in it.
But we're going to set up 15-minute cities to save the environment, right?
This is how phony this all is.
It wasn't about the environment.
It was about the Marxism, of course.
And, you know, the way it was sold in the United States, Nixon's EPA, we're going to protect the environment.
We're going to clean up pollution, and they did at the beginning of that.
One of the guys that I worked with at the American Tradition Institute, David Schneer, Joined the EPA at its inception.
He spent 30 years there.
And he saw it in its mission creep and how it metastasized.
And they were no longer interested in cleaning up pollution.
Yes, they did a good job.
They cleaned up a lot of different places, just like they're cleaning up the Sane River now.
You know, there were some rivers that were cleaned up.
RFK Jr. did a good job of cleaning up the Hudson River and things like that.
Those are great. It's a good thing to do.
But then they turn it into this...
This climate control thing, right?
And they're not trying to control the climate.
Of course, they are doing some things on their own to control the climate, and they don't want to talk about their geoengineering.
They want to make it all about your car and your SUV. And the cows, of course, the cars and the cows, they've got to be stopped.
It's however they want to use this MacGuffin.
And as I said earlier, you now got energy industry fears that the White House will declare COVID-like climate emergency.
Yeah, because the climate must be perfect.
All the year, you know, as he said, right?
I loved listening to Richard Burton.
He went on a talk show once, and they said, you know, I bet it would sound impressive if you just read the phone book.
And they handed him a phone book, and he opens it up, and he says, Treeport, Louisiana.
And he starts reading off the names, and it did sound very impressive, even though you're just reading names out of the phone book.
I thought it was also funny.
That was a live thing.
Of course, he, you know, on Broadway, Camelot, the original production, not the movie that they did, but the original production had Julie Andrews in it, Robert Goulet, of course, was there as Lancelot, and he was King Arthur.
But as he was doing that live production, he's in a suit, and he's just standing there.
He's not dancing around on stage.
That's not Richard Burton. And after the part that I played there, they go to a little musical interlude, a little break of about eight bars or whatever.
And as he's not singing, they pull back a little bit, and you see him standing there.
He's got his hands in his pockets, and he's just glaring at the audience.
The musical interlude. I thought it was really funny, especially considering the fact that now it's not about music at all.
It's all, or lyrics is all about the dancing.
Anyway, the energy industry, and they're worried about a climate emergency.
They said they're leaning into that.
So the U.S. Oil and Gas Association President, Tim Stewart, he said, if you grant the president's emergency powers to declare a climate emergency, it's just like COVID. Yeah, that's right.
So I call it MacGuffin.
And who was it that modeled that?
Who was it that used executive orders and emergency powers to lock down this country like no president had ever done before in the past?
Well, but of course they're all going to do it now in the future.
It was Trump who set that precedent, just like it was Trump who set the president to do gun control by executive order of the president.
He did a lockdown by executive order.
He allowed the CDC to even go out and say, well, we're not going to allow any evictions or foreclosures.
They don't have that kind of authority.
The president doesn't have that kind of authority.
But he established that, and people said, well, it's okay.
It's okay because he's our guy.
Well, listen to this woman who is describing...
What I would call the WHO coup, the WHO coup against our way of life.
We're undergoing a soft coup, and the idea is to create a whole new set of laws and ignore the existing human rights laws and other laws under the pretext of pandemic preparedness and the biosecurity agenda.
The WHO is developing through all its nations, but with the WHO directorate in the United States in charge, a pandemic treaty and amendments to the existing international health regulations that will remove the human rights protections currently under We're good to go.
Also, we will be subject, if they can make this work, to vaccines developed in 100 days, which the organization CEPI is planning to do.
And one of the people who founded CEPI was Jeremy Farrar, who is now the chief scientist at the WHO, to bring this forward.
Other things that amendments do is to bind the state so they are no longer recommendations, but enforceable edicts.
Provide a liability shield.
Get rid of intellectual property rights.
Move supplies from one country to another.
Enforce digital passports.
And the Director General of WHO can...
Demand that a pandemic or a potential pandemic exists.
He can just declare it with no standards, and then countries around the world will have to obey.
And of course, her audience knows that.
She's at the European Parliament.
They all know that as well.
She's talking to you, in case you don't know that.
And these people are catching on everywhere.
I understand this is the agenda.
Now the question becomes, what are we going to do about it?
As the energy industry executive said, an emergency declaration on the climate could give the president, quote, vast and unchecked authority to shut down everything from communications to infrastructure.
And that's what he's been doing.
He's been doing that in the name of his war against Russia and Ukraine.
He said they can literally do exactly what they did in COVID. And of course, this is being laid down in multiple ways.
The WHO, the WHO, are going to have their coup, their new rules to make their orders mandatory, but I think the real thing that is coming is this climate lockdown.
If you disagree with the climate emergency, said Mr.
Stewart, Your speech can be shut down.
Sorry, been done.
You know, that's one of the other areas that they censored me on.
We really need to be paying attention to that because that power could be extended indefinitely until the quote-unquote climate emergency is over.
And who knows how long that would last.
You see, they can make... This is why the climate, MacGuffin, is so incredibly dangerous.
Because they can make the argument to make this permanent.
And RFK Jr.
would be just the guy to do it because he is a true believer in this stuff.
About 60 congressional Democrats recently backed legislation known as the, quote, Climate Emergency Act.
That was in 2021.
It was sponsored by Representative Earl Blumenauer, Democrat of Oregon, that would require the Biden administration to make a climate-related emergency declaration.
And if you go back, and I talked about this on air a couple weeks ago, somebody went back and found a statement, or actually a tweet, from RFK Jr.
As we were finishing our two weeks to flatten the curve, perhaps he was naive enough to believe that that was really what they were up to.
And as we were getting to that two weeks to unflatten the curve and to release people, there was an article that was written Saying, well, you know, we've got to be careful.
You know, this has been really good this two weeks.
It was really good for the environment, and we don't want to come bouncing back with this.
We've got to keep this stuff locked down.
RFK Jr. retweeted that article, took some excerpts from it, and endorsed that idea that for the good of the planet, we need to continue this lockdown stuff.
And at least, you know, aspects of it.
We've got to continue to lock people down.
Last week, the U.N. Secretary General Antonio Guterres...
So the era of global boiling has arrived.
The era of global warming has ended and now we've moved into global boiling.
And you see all these ridiculous headlines.
Oh look, people are getting burned just because, you know, they fall down on the ground.
That's always been the case. You know, in really hot areas.
I remember we knew somebody had a screen printing business.
And he would use a heat gun to determine what the temperature was.
And so he could, you know, point this gun at something and get the temperature.
You know, so he went outside.
He was in Vegas.
And he went outside and he pointed...
The gun at the hood of the car, and I forget what it was.
It was like 150 degrees or something really, really crazy.
And that was 20 years ago.
I can fry eggs on that and all the rest of the stuff.
This is nothing new.
It's not unprecedented.
We see the kinds of talk of, oh, this is near a record.
They'll always put that kind of stuff in.
They'll hype it, hype it, hype it, and then there's a little caveat, near record temperatures.
Well, they're not record temperatures.
So he said, this is a year of global boiling.
Well, they never even showed that there was global warming.
But even if it was global warming, and even if it was global boiling, they're not doing anything to show that there is a connection to our cars and our cows, which they want to take.
And of course, there is no connection to that.
If it is global warming, first of all, they need to show that to me.
I'm not convinced of that.
But if you are convinced of it, you better ask them as to what the cause is that they can prove.
They are just asserting that it's your cars and your cows, and they've got to take away your food and your freedom of mobility.
He said, we must turn a year of burning heat into a year of burning ambition.
I think they've had burning ambition for a very long time.
They've had half a century of burning ambition to take everything from us, and that will be the means by which they do it.
Going back to Mr.
Stewart with the oil industry, he recently said, the LA Times article and similar reports are part of a propaganda war designed to condition the public to have the public think that it is their duty to the state to To be miserable, cold, and hungry.
That's the way they're selling it.
You know, forced austerity.
They're going to force it on you. But they want you to take it voluntarily.
They want you to believe that you're being patriotic.
Just like it was patriotic to mask yourself up and to isolate yourself and to scold other people who didn't do that.
It's all about that.
He said it wasn't too long ago that even posing a question like this, you should be miserable, cold, and hungry.
That would be considered preposterous, even from Democrats.
After all, one of the defining problems of the third world countries is a lack of reliable energy infrastructure and supply.
And this article from Zero Hedge points out, notably, data from the EPA shows that some of the hottest heat waves in the United States occurred in the 1930s, and particularly in 1936.
What was that called? That was called the Dust Bowl.
What Steinbeck's Grapes of Wrath was all about.
And so we've seen this type of stuff before.
And, you know, Steve Malloy, who has JunkScience.com, is always putting up stuff.
It's like, oh, it's hot. Well, look, it was the same temperature 34 years ago.
We had the same, you know, and we have variation.
Look at this. Did you realize that the weather changes all the time?
Some years are hotter, some years are colder.
But it's always happening.
But it's always, oh, near record temperatures.
But, you know, they always find, well, yeah, but it was...
And we haven't kept that many records.
We haven't kept them for that long.
Then you ask, well, where are you putting the thermometers?
And how are you reading them?
How are they calibrated? We just had a story about how the calibration on a whole slew of these things was off by a couple of degrees.
But they're telling us that if it changes by one and a half degrees centigrade, we're all going to die.
Everything on Earth will die.
And yet they've got this miscalibration on their own sensors.
Where do they put them? Do they put them in concrete heat islands?
Or do they put them where they used to be?
You know, there's no consistency.
There's no history on that.
And yet we see Axios coming out with this headline.
Existential threats to humanity are soaring this year.
And the number one is climate.
The danger, they said, is becoming impossible to ignore climate.
Well, you know why it's impossible to ignore?
Because of the media. The media keeps hyping this, pushing this with its propaganda, and that truly is the issue.
A U.S. grid operator, PJM, declares level one emergency amid scorching heat.
Why are we seeing all these stories?
Now, think about this.
Even 10 years ago, you know, even, well, I won't say five years ago, but we never used to have stories about, oh, well, it's really hot.
I don't know if the grid can keep up with this.
Oh, it's really cold. I don't know if the grid can keep up with this.
Why are we having these stories now?
It isn't that the weather has become extreme.
It's that their policies have become extreme.
These extremists have been shutting down our power grid.
That's why you see all this stuff.
And yet they portray this as extreme weather.
No, it's extreme politicians.
They're the cause of these power grid issues.
And of course...
If you've got power grid issues, you're not going to have electric vehicles.
You're not going to have electric heat.
You're not going to have electric air conditioning.
You're not going to have electric ranges.
But they want you to have everything electric on the grid so they can shut it down.
And so, man-made climate change.
Well, the majority of the Greek wildfires are a result of arson amidst the Greek climate change minister.
But see, here's the real issue.
And I've said this from the very beginning.
I said this, you know, when we looked at the pictures of, here's a time lapse of New York City and as the smoke from Canada is coming in.
Here's the question that nobody is asking.
Not how did these fires start, but why can't they stop the fires?
Why can't they stop?
They can't stop the fires because of their new environmentalist quote-unquote rules.
Their environmentalism that they put in place of stewardship.
The forests are there to be managed.
We are put here on earth to have dominion over the earth and to take care of what God has given us.
But these people have neglected this.
They've left the dead wood in there.
They prohibit people from being able to take it out, build with it.
And so it becomes fuel for a fire that they cannot put out.
And this is, again, you know, my uncle who was a forestry professor was talking about this 50 years ago.
And now we see it happening.
The real question is not what started the fire, but why can't they put it out?
And the answer is because of their environmentalism.
Breitbart says, while legacy media outlets have begun begrudgingly admitting that arson is playing a major role in the fires, they continue to claim that the supposed climate change has made it easier for the fires to spread.
This is another one of these issues, like, well, you know, what is...
So it's really, really, really hot out there, is it?
Well, it's not record, but it's really, really hot, and the UN wants to tell us that we've gone from global warming to global boiling.
But what is the temperature at which the forest catches on fire?
Is it even the temperatures that we see in Death Valley?
No, no. That can kill you.
We've had some people who died out there.
Death Valley. Why do you think they called it Death Valley?
Was it because they knew that somewhere in the future it was going to be so hot that you would have these kinds of issues?
No, it was always like that.
And so, you know, this is nothing new.
And, of course, the arson is not new, but the Greek climate minister reported that fires have burnt 400 square kilometers of land in just the month of July, compared to the recent yearly average of around 500 square kilometers.
That's up about 50% in terms of what is burned.
While devastating, says Breitbart, it should be noted that far more land was burned in previous years, including the recorded high in 2007, When about four times as much land was burned.
Again, you know, there's a lot of land, it's up 50%, but it was four times that.
And that was only, you know, just what, 16 years ago?
So they've actually, now that was Greece, and they admit, these are man-made.
These are man-made. Nobody talks about why they can't put them out.
But here's Italy. Italy, they actually caught an arsonist in the act, setting fires.
This is a drone footage.
They pull back and they see the fire that's there and actually get a picture of the guy.
The funny thing about this is that they blurred out his face.
I mean, this is like the shoplifters in San Francisco.
And, you know, they blurred the people's faces out so you don't see who the criminals are.
Here's this guy setting fire to the forest.
They blur out his face.
So, again, that's Italy.
That's southern Italy where they're doing it.
One person put that out and said, oh, look, police drone caught a suspected arsonist in Calabria, southern Italy, during the widespread wildfires in Sicily and Sardinia.
This is unstoppable global arson.
And so you can ask yourself, why are people doing this?
Are they doing this as...
Enemies of the country?
Are these Russians coming in and doing this?
That must be Putin. That's got to be Putin.
Or maybe it's the Soros immigrants who come in and really hate this country.
Maybe it's just agents of chaos that are coming in.
And we've got to get the people with Get Smart.
What was it? Control. Yeah, that was Control.
It was his group. We've got to get Control.
Yeah. Because chaos is out there.
That's the way they always run it, isn't it?
They deliberately create the chaos and they say, now you need our control.
We're going to control everything here.
But of course, then there's also countries like China and India who are given a pass on the Paris Climate Accord.
The Paris Climate Accord.
You know, they went there to sign the Paris Climate Accord and nobody said anything about cleaning up the seine at that time, right?
You know, we got this river.
We haven't been able to, you know, 2015, the Paris Climate Accord.
We haven't been able to swim in this thing for a hundred years, but let's talk about saving the planet.
And of course, when we talk about saving the planet, they don't put any restrictions on the number or how filthy the power plants were that China and India could build.
And then you have this type of thing.
This is a massive tire fire.
Take a look at that. Now, this is in Kuwait.
The person who put this up said this is the world's largest tire graveyard in Kuwait.
They will never show you things like this because it breaks their narrative of farting cows, gas stoves, and wood fire pizza ovens.
It's not about climate change.
It's about power, money, control.
This is the globalist systematic takedown of America.
The World Economic Forum is destroying America to make way for their new world order, the Great Reset, the Agenda 2030.
This is from Wall Street Apes who put this out.
And whoever that is, he or she is spot on.
And they get it because the third thing they say is, for the U.S. government, it's all eyes on Donald Trump and the Trump indictment.
Don't pay attention to anything else.
As they destroy our country.
Only pay attention to Trump and the never-ending Trump-indicted drama.
A 24-7 hypnotic trance of the public.
Made of distractions.
And you see that massive, massive tire graveyard there in Kuwait.
And you know, they used the plastic in the ocean.
They use that to attack us and to push climate lockdowns and things like that.
But yet, where is most of the plastic in the ocean?
It's in the Pacific Ocean. It's being dumped by China.
Just as they are allowed to open as many and as dirty coal power plants as they wish, same with India.
So they dump plastic in and we're the ones who have to give up everything that we have.
You see, whether or not there is global warming, it's not caused by the things that we are doing.
But it's being used to take away everything that we have.
By the way, Karen put this on my desk while we were talking.
We got a new t-shirt, a new MacGuffin t-shirt.
We're going to put this up on the website.
I don't know if you can see this or not.
But it's a nice design that her brother, who is an artist, came up with.
And on the back, it has the David Knight Show.
And so we have a new t-shirt with a MacGuffin.
And it's actually got our show information and website on the back.
We forgot to do that on the...
On the other one. So we got a MacGuffin t-shirt, and we'll be talking more about the MacGuffin.
And when we come back, we're going to talk about some, let's see, let's do a half hour left.
Let's talk about the UFOs first.
So we're going to come back with some information about UFOs.
We'll be right back. Decoding
the mainstream propaganda.
It's the David Knight Show.
Yeah, let's talk a little bit about the UFOs.
Isn't it interesting what the government is telling?
After all these years of telling us that it's not true, and we still have some people in the government who are saying that it's not true, but we have hearings that are being done in Congress.
They love to hold hearings.
They love to be on television, but they don't do anything else, right?
This is really, it's all dog and pony stuff.
And so he had everybody, part of it is to get headlines and to get their picture on the news and to say crazy stuff.
News Nation, this is the leftist news organization that interviewed and attacked RFK Jr.
over vaccines and a lot of other stuff.
They said following Wednesdays, that's last Wednesdays, not yesterday, widely watched congressional hearings on UAPs and UFOs.
And as I said before, why are they calling them UAPs now instead of UFOs?
Instead of unidentified flying objects, they're unidentified aerial phenomena.
And of course, part of this hearing was the nonsense about the Chinese spy balloon.
That should tell you how non-serious these people are.
It should tell you how fake they are.
It's coming from the intelligence agencies who tried to raise the alarm...
And use the spy balloon to distract you from Biden and all the rest of the stuff.
And of course, the timing was perfect for this as well.
Things that Biden did not want you to see.
But it was also being done in the House, and they were not doing that for Biden.
The House is not holding these hearings to distract people from the Biden stuff.
They wanted to get on TV. And so News Nation says, well, here's what we do and don't know after the hearing.
We had David Grush, I am Grush, largely recounted second-hand testimony and provided no evidence to support his claims.
And then you had a former Navy commander and pilot, David Fravor.
He recounted a first-hand experience with so-called tic-tac UFOs, but said he was never briefed on the object or its potential origins.
Former Navy pilot Ryan Graves also recounted an encounter he had with an object that he described as a black sphere floating inside of a clear cube.
Graves indicated such encounters were extremely common among pilots, and yet there was no evidence presented to support his claim.
This is sounding very much like climate change.
There's no evidence to support their claims.
As a matter of fact, as I point out many times, we tried to get the evidence From Michael Mann, who had come up with a thing that was used so much by Al Gore, you know, the hockey stick they call.
Not going to let you see my evidence.
Fought us in court and won.
That's my private stuff.
You can't see my stuff. You can't see my data.
Really? We'll talk about that when we get to the superconductor thing here.
That's not the way you do science.
But, of course, there's no evidence to support the climate change.
There's no evidence to support that it's cars and cows.
And there's no evidence to support the COVID. There was no data collected at all before they started putting out the Trump shots.
So, again, no evidence for anything.
Well, yeah, I guess we could call this the UAP MacGuffin.
They've got to change it to something so people don't snicker.
You can't talk about UFOs without people kind of joking about it.
So you've got to take this seriously.
So now we're going to call it something different.
We're going to call it UAP. Because people have been joking about UFOs for a very long time.
We've got to make it serious now.
While lawmakers seemed largely accepting of the witness testimony, only Representative Matt Gaetz said that he had seen any evidence of alien life firsthand.
Well, we have...
An example of some of the back and forth with this.
Here is something going back and forth with Nancy Mace and David Grouch about alien life.
Intelligent extraterrestrials.
Yes. Something I can't discuss in a public setting.
Okay, I can't ask when you think this occurred.
If you believe we have crashed craft, stated earlier, do we have the bodies of the pilots who piloted this craft?
As I've stated publicly already in my News Nation interview, biologics came with some of these recoveries.
Were they, I guess, human or non-human biologics?
Non-human, and that was the assessment of people with direct knowledge on the program I talked to that are currently still on the program.
And was this documentary evidence, this video, photos, eyewitness?
Like, how would that be determined?
The specific documentation I would have to talk to you in a skiff about.
Okay. So, and you may or may not be able to answer my last question, and maybe we get into a skiff at the next hearing that we have, but who in the government either, what agency, sub-agency, what contractors, who should be called into the next hearing about UAPs, either in a public setting or even in a private setting?
And you probably can't name names, but what agencies or organizations, contractors, et cetera, do we need to call in to get these Questions answered, whether it's about funding, what programs are happening, and what's out there.
I can give you a specific cooperative and hostile witness list of specific individuals that were in those.
And how soon can we get that list?
I'm happy to provide that to you after the hearing.
Super. Thank you. And I yield back.
Oh, yeah. Well, you know, I'm sorry I can't talk about that publicly.
We'll have to get into one of these, you know, compartmented things.
You know, it's kind of like if you ever saw Get Smart, they got the cone of silence.
So, you know, the... What?
I can't hear you. We're going to have to do that.
We're going to have to do something like that.
Gates said he also asked a member of the Frank Clue why they couldn't take video of the incident that they were talking about.
And he said that the pilot explained that his radar and his thermal imaging went down.
That's the forward-looking infrared thermal imaging went down.
Forced him to manually take the image from one of his lenses.
According to Gates, the pilot encountered UAPs.
Not UFOs. UAPs.
They were in a diamond formation somewhere over the Gulf of Mexico.
And then he saw what I could only describe as an orb.
Well, subsequent to that, we did have a press conference and this is how that press conference went.
Okay, thank you for waiting.
The President has asked me to come out and make a brief statement about the wire that just went out a couple minutes ago.
To make things short, I will just confirm that yes, we do have a moon base, and yes, we are currently experiencing some bear problems.
Now I will open it up if there are any questions.
Mr. President, Mr.
- It was press secretary. - It was press secretary. - New York Times.
- Uh, yes.
- I have a 10, no, 11 part question. - I'm sorry, I only have time for two. - All right, let me get this straight.
So the United States government President, Mr. President, Mr. President, Mr.
President, Mr.
President, Mr. President, How long have we had the moon base?
And are these bears earth bears or are they from the moon?
I'm sorry, I'm not at liberty to disclose how long we've had this moon base at this time.
We do believe these to be earth bears.
We have no reason to believe these to be lunar bears or even Saturn bears.
Todd Albright, PBS. There's Saturn bears?
I'm also not at liberty to go into the various types of woodland life forms on Saturn or any of the other 12 planets.
Nine planets. Right.
I've said too much already.
What I can show you is the images that have been beamed down to us from the Odyssey satellite system just a couple hours ago.
This is the view out of the front door of the United States secret moon base.
This was taken yesterday before we discovered the bear problem.
And this one was taken just a couple hours ago.
So, as you can see...
Bears everywhere. Yeah, those bears appear to have guns and motorcycles.
We believe they may be involved in some sort of intergalactic drug cartel, perhaps affiliated with one of the interstellar wizard alliances.
Wizard alliances? Yes, next question.
Just a thought, more of a shot in the dark, but we wouldn't happen to be invading Iran today, would we?
You got me.
I fell for it.
I fell for it. You almost got away with that one.
No, I went too far.
I almost had it.
I should have stopped. Yeah, well, that was the whitest kid you know.
That was 14 years ago.
And of course, if you're looking at this, you know immediately that this is not a real press conference because we had a white male who was...
That's press secretary. Republicans and Democrats don't do that anyway.
But yeah, the CIA has a well-documented history of planting fake UFO stories when they want to distract the public.
Yeah, there's something really off about this guy, David Grouch, as I've said from the very beginning.
One person said, he kind of gives me a used car salesperson vibe.
You know, he hung out with the Geospatial Intelligence Agency, James Clapper's agency, where he...
So nothing to be concerned about.
We would never have anybody like the work for James Clapper lie to Congress or anything like that, right?
No, never would.
But there was a good find from Darren Beattie, a revolver.
He said, look at that.
When the CIA wanted to distract its people from what it was doing in Guatemala, they floated the idea of planting flying saucer stories in the media.
And so this is back in 1954 while the CIA was engineering a coup in Guatemala.
And they have, as part of this document that he tweeted out, it was embedded in there.
They said, well, one of the ways that we can suppress this and one of the things that we can do to get people away from it is, if possible, fabricate big human interest story.
Oh, well, you know. You don't have to actually fabricate it.
I mean, they didn't create the story of the Titanic sub thing, the Ocean Gate thing.
They didn't create that incident, but they used it.
But then you can also create stuff about UFO if you've got stuff that's coming up that you don't want people to know about, like Hunter Biden, things like that.
So fabricate a big human interest story like flying saucers, they said in 1954.
Or birth sextuplets in a remote area to take the play away.
So you can even just make up the fact that there's sextuplets that were born from somewhere.
Because if it's remote enough and nobody can actually take your word for it.
We put that out with our partners in the press, the Operation Mockingbird people, and they'll run with that, just like they're running with the UFO stuff.
You have to always be concerned about the kind of narratives that they're putting out.
And now we've got the Jerusalem Post.
Putting out this story about Russians.
It's not the Russians putting this out.
It's the Jerusalem Post.
UFOs once took control.
I'm sorry. That is supposed to be now UAPs.
UAPs. But they said UFOs once took control of Russian ICBMs and nearly caused World War III. And now we're just finding out about it.
Wait a minute. I thought it was Biden who took control of Ukraine in his nearly starting World War III. Let's not talk about that.
It's UFOs. And if it breaks out, it's not going to be Biden's fault at all.
It's not going to be NATO's fault.
It'll probably be space aliens that did it.
Yeah. Just like that press conference there.
On Rumble, RCF 2020, thank you for the tip.
He says, the government's guilty of lying until they prove themselves otherwise.
Exactly right. That's the George Carlin, I think.
I never believe anything the government is telling me, as a matter of fact.
The testimony was given by George Knapp, an award-winning Las Vegas-based journalist.
Who knows all this? He knows this Las Vegas journalist.
He knows that took over an ICM base in Russia.
He just knows that. I don't know how he knows that.
He's reporting that UFOs, who are now known as UAPs, and the alleged conspiracy surrounding them, he has reported on that extensively, and now he's got a new story to get headlines.
One incident that really raised alarm bells, he said, was at a Russian ICBM base in Ukraine.
According to Sokolov, the UFOs somehow took control of the launch system.
UFOs appeared over the base, performed astonishing maneuvers in front of stunned eyewitnesses, and then somehow took control of the launch system.
The missiles were aimed at the U.S. and were suddenly fired up.
Launch control codes were somehow entered, and the base was unable to stop what could have initiated World War III. Then, just as suddenly, the UFOs disappeared and the launch control system shut down.
After these incidents, the Russian Defense Ministry said that we should leave these UFOs alone, since they may have incredible capacities for retaliation.
All this was alarming enough, but it also flies in the face of claims that the U.S. has made about UFOs since the late 1960s.
Since 1969, the position of our military has been that the UFOs pose no threat to national security and that they're not worthy of further study.
This dismissive attitude is directly at odds with what has been revealed in documents, reports, and internal memos, said the UFO journalist.
So also testifying at Congress was an investigative journalist, Jeremy Korbel, who said that UFOs are a major concern and that we have been outgunned.
Again, all of this is done without proof, without documentation.
We have some video that has now come out now.
And of course, nobody has ever suggested that any of that stuff could have been faked.
Just like I'm sure they didn't fake the moonshots either on our moon base.
Look, the only question as we look at all this stuff in my mind is where is this deception coming from?
The Bible talks about Extraterrestrials.
And I'm not saying that God is a space alien.
I don't buy any of that stuff.
I know that Greg Reese did a report about that.
I had so many people writing me about that.
Jehovah is just the name, he said, that the Jews gave to the space alien that encountered them.
And we've seen that kind of stuff coming from David Icke and that type of thing.
My worldview is based on the Bible, and I base it on the Bible because I've seen the Bible proven correct on everything over a period of time.
I mean, you look at it as a cold case.
One person has a sight, a cold case, Warner Wallace, a cold case Christianity, looked at it as a cold case detective.
He said, well, let's take a look at what the witnesses say.
Does it hold up? Does it hold together?
Or you can take a look at prophecies that were You know, you look at Isaiah, 750 BC. Look at the prophecies that came true with that.
Look at how the story lines up with what we see physically, with geologically, as well as with archaeology, ancient civilizations.
You know, we have other books that talk about ancient civilizations.
I don't have any proof that it was there.
But archaeology began in the middle of the 1800s.
People took the Bible and they used it as a treasure map like Indiana Jones would.
Well, it says we go over here and here.
Oh, look, it is there.
You know, that type of thing. So that's what my worldview is based on.
It's based on faith, but it's not a blind faith.
But these people have a blind faith in whatever they're talking about.
And if you look at what the Bible describes, God is an extraterrestrial, if you will.
He's not of this earth. He's over and above it.
And so are angels and demons and fallen angels and all the rest of this stuff.
Do they exist in another dimension?
Could they be physical and also then disappear because they're multidimensional beings?
All that stuff is a possibility.
I don't know what is happening with that.
I don't know if this is a satanic deception or if it's a CIA deception.
I'll just say that as far as you talk about satanic activity, I would include the CIA in that.
They're kind of their agents on Earth.
You know, they're kind of another end of the snake, if you will.
The CIA. So I don't know if it's the CIA trying to pull something on us, or if this is some kind of a satanic deception.
I just know what's real.
I know what I put my faith and trust in, and you better take a look at it yourself.
Say, you know, what am I going to base my life on?
What am I going to base my hope on?
And how do I make sense of this world?
Who am I? Why am I here?
Where am I going? Do you have the answers for that?
Well, the Bible does.
And it hangs together.
And so, just as the person who left the tip here said, this is an op-ed piece, I wanted to believe, but then the CIA took the lead on all this stuff.
For decades, the government and the regime media have scorned and ridiculed anybody who claimed to have seen a UFO. Now, as this teetering empire of debt, corruption, and war, As rapidly heading toward economic and societal collapse, the government and the regime media suddenly declare that UFOs are absolutely true.
And they admit that they've known about them for decades.
Well, yeah, we were lying to you before, but we're telling the truth now.
Remember when Fauci and the company did that?
I lied to you about the masks.
I said they didn't work, but now they do work, and you've got to wear them.
They spent trillions on the COVID scam to keep the government-favored megacorporations afloat while they initiated their depopulation scheme, but that scam is winding down.
They spent $100 billion on their Ukrainian PSYOP to prop up our defense industry and to distract the ignorant masses from their rapidly declining living standards.
They also used it to step up their program of forced austerity via sanctions on energy.
With the Biden crime family seemingly on the ropes, it was time to roll out the UFO. Whenever the government tells you anything, just remember George Carlin's first rule.
He said, I have certain rules that I live by.
My first rule is, I don't believe anything the government tells me.
And of course, the people who are doing SETI, The search for extraterrestrial intelligence.
This is something that Carl Sagan used to love to talk about.
It's the movie, Contact, and all the rest of this stuff.
These people will set up their listening devices and they're looking for a regular repeating pattern that is out there.
And if they can find that, well then that's not natural.
And you think about how they overlook The fact that, you know, we use these arguments for intelligent design.
When you see a building, you know it's got a builder.
You see a car, you know it's got a maker.
What about you? You're far more complicated than that.
You're far more complicated than the watch.
You're self-replicating.
You've got error-correcting codes.
The DNA is evidence.
A very sophisticated programming code that has error correction in it.
And so, you know, you have all these different things, but no, they're not going to look at us.
They're not going to look at the world around them.
They want to look at a very simple repeating pattern, and of course they were fooled by quasars at one point in time.
These were some electromagnetically charged bipolar devices that were rotating, and so it produced an electromagnetic signal that was periodic, and they thought, oh, this is intelligence for sure.
Well, it wasn't. And so they're still looking out there, but they won't look here.
They won't look inside of themselves.
They won't look at the Bible.
They won't look at any of this stuff.
But one of these people is saying, well, I'm kind of skeptical of what I'm being told in Washington.
So remember all that buzz about the UFO whistleblower who testified before Congress last week that the government had alien carcasses?
Well, according to an actual alien hunter at the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, Those claims may have some serious issues.
In an editorial for MSNBC, SETI Institute senior astronomer noted that David Grush's bold allegations of the Pentagon has collected downed alien spacecraft and bodies.
They said this feels very hollow.
There is no corroborating evidence.
The person who was the senior astronomer there, Seth Shostak, said that's a truly extraordinary claim, and it is begging for some extraordinary evidence.
But where is the evidence?
If such compelling evidence existed, thousands of scientists would be fighting one another to study it.
Let me tell you something. When I look at these dog and pony shows being put on by Republicans like Nancy Mace and Matt Gaetz, you know, it reminds me of all the January the 6th stuff.
Show me the evidence.
Show me the evidence. Certainly it's plausible.
Yeah, it's plausible. Certainly I understand that people mess with elections all the time.
Show me the evidence. Certainly I understand that God is supernatural and above all this and not part of this earth.
But show me the evidence that what you are saying is true.
Show me the evidence.
Well, I can't show that to you.
I can't. It's just too secret.
Too secret. Well, I call BS, just like I call BS on the climate stuff from Michael Mann because he wouldn't show his evidence.
Even if the U.S. government or others are suppressing evidence of ETs, the thousands of space satellites orbiting Earth would have captured videos or photos of them by now, says the SETI scientist.
The SETI astronomer, who himself is very much a believer in alien life, said it simply doesn't add up.
The government would or could use this ruse for very long.
You see, I'm a believer in extraterrestrial life, but not as they define it, you know, any more than I would believe in the Hindu gods.
I still strongly maintain that alien visitation is not something that could be kept secret, he wrote.
The size of such a secret is just too big.
Well, you know, it's not just the moon base that is there.
We also have, as things get crazier and crazier, this story out of Japan.
As we said, you know, this is, people just are going into this fantasy world where they cut everything off.
You look at what is happening in Japan.
There's nowhere on earth where the people are more dissatisfied with their work than in Japan.
I mean, nowhere. It's even close.
They hate the society that they live in.
Alcoholism and pornography are rampant there.
People are isolated. They don't like their job.
They're trapped in it. And they're looking for escape.
And they're trying to escape into a non-reality.
And so we have this guy in Japan.
Can you pull the sound down a little bit?
This is a guy.
He's got a collie suit.
This is a guy here, obviously.
This is not a dog. And it's like some kind of creepy taxidermy project.
It's kind of the next step of Norman Bates if he were to get out of jail.
He's going to grab some of the taxidermy stuff off of the wall and make himself into a faux animal.
There he is. I'm rolling over on my belly, which is not at all a belly.
It's just fur. Yeah, it's this dead head that can't move, and he's rolling over and doing all this stuff.
$14,000 suit, collie suit, that he's hanging around in.
I've got to say that my collie is, even with Scout's injuries and everything, he's a lot more agile than this.
And I think he's probably a lot smarter than this Japanese man.
I don't think Scout would spend $14,000 on a suit to pretend that he's a furry.
But this is the type of stuff that they're also selling us in the schools.
You know, this furry stuff.
So, as this is happening, and as I played for you the whitest kids you know talking about the moon base and the space bears and all the rest of this stuff, people are starting to get so skeptical about everything that they're even questioning sun bears at a Chinese zoo.
And of course, sun bears don't look like other bears, and they do look very fake, and they do look very strange.
And you had pictures of this sun bear where they stand on, they're smaller bears, and they tend to stand on their feet quite a bit and stand erect.
And you had people circling the back of this bear saying, look at how this is just, you know, the quote-unquote fur of whatever is now wrinkled up down the bottom.
It looks like somebody's wearing a suit.
Well, I mean, they didn't show any zippers or anything on it.
And the animals did have their eyes were working on like this animal here.
And there he is right there.
And sun bears do look very strange.
But the zoo insisted that it was not a person in a suit.
Unfortunately for them, they did it with a message that said, Hi, I'm the sun bear.
And that's not the way that you want to do it.
But, you know, people are getting skeptical, so we don't even really believe the real stuff.
And that is one of the things that is a goal of government, right?
They get you so jaded that you won't even believe something when it's real.
Or they take something that's real and they add false details to it to discredit it.
And so now you've got people who are looking at that and they're wondering, is this a moon-based bear?
Or is this a bear from one of the 12 planets?
What is this bear?
We're not exactly sure at this point in time.
And part of this...
As a matter of fact, let me go back to DeSantis, because he had some statements about education that I thought were interesting.
Again, Ramaswamy wants to debate DeSantis on immigration and H-1B visas.
Well, good luck with that, Ramaswamy, with the Republican primary.
DeSantis went on with Megyn Kelly, and he was talking about Trump and Trump's LGBT record.
He said Trump is a pioneer in injecting men into women's competitions.
He has also opposed things like protecting locker rooms and bathrooms.
And when he was running, he said North Carolina shouldn't have done what they did.
And, of course, what they did at the time, that was in Charlotte.
That was the first place that happened.
Charlotte, which is a big city run by Democrats.
And they said, well, they're one of the first places to put men in women's bathrooms.
And so the state legislature shut it down.
Trump criticized that when he was running.
DeSantis said he's been a pioneer in injecting women into these competitions.
Look at the beauty pathogens 10 years or so ago.
And then he's also opposed things like protecting locker rooms and bathrooms when he was running.
He said North Carolina shouldn't have done what they did.
So I don't think that's where our voters are.
He said, I think our voters believe that standing up for women and girls means protecting their rights to compete with integrity and protecting things like bathrooms and locker rooms.
So I don't think that's where our voters are.
And then Megyn Kelly comes out and says, well, do you think he's changed?
I mean, that was 15 years ago.
That's a lifetime on the issue of the trans rights thing.
Wow. First of all, she doesn't have her timeline correct.
Secondly, as usual, Megyn Kelly is uninformed.
She doesn't realize, and sadly, neither did DeSantis.
He said, I don't know. I don't know.
I think he's kind of had a flippant opinion on it.
Maybe he's just changing his...
DeSantis isn't even aware.
He's not informed either. Of what I talked about.
The fact that Trump ran on this in 2020.
Virtue signaling about it.
Virtue signaled about coming in as the first president who supported same-sex mirage.
Virtue signaled about appointing the first cabinet person who was openly homosexual.
And they made a big deal. It wasn't about his qualifications.
His qualifications was that he was homosexual.
That's not a qualification for getting a cabinet position.
It is in the Biden administration.
It is in the Trump administration.
But it shouldn't be that way.
And, you know, go back to the don't ask, don't tell.
If you can do the job, do the job.
I don't want to know about your private life.
That's your private life. Keep it private.
I don't need to know about that.
But they virtually signaled about that.
I played you all the clips of the people in the 2020 campaign.
So this is not ancient history, number one.
Number two, the fact that it was so far in the past, It shows you that Trump was there at the very foundation of this, pushing it from the very beginning, just like Michael Kelly did 10 years ago.
I'm sorry, not Michael Kelly.
General Flynn. And so when you look at this, as I've said before, DeSantis wasn't informed on this.
DeSantis didn't know what to say with being called sanctimonious.
He should have owned that. He should have said that.
Oh, you call me sanctimonious because I want to protect women, because I want to protect babies, and you don't think the babies should be protected at six weeks when their heart is beating?
You think that's too harsh, as Trump said?
Well, I'll take the label as being sanctimonious, because if it's sanctimonious to protect women from men, and to protect babies from mutilation, and to protect kids from mutilation, I'll take it.
I'll take it. But he doesn't do that.
And then when it comes to this so-called slavery curriculum, I have not looked at the curriculum.
I've looked at some of the people who tried to defend it.
And I think it's a really stupid defense that they have here to try to defend this.
And so he's put in an opportunity for Tim Scott and many other people to attack them on that.
And I think it is one of these things like the Don't Say Gay Bill, which was not about that.
But it was used for that.
It was characterized as that.
And they haven't been able to get a hold of this.
It's not important. It's not enough to have the right policies.
You've got to be able to defend the policy.
And you don't defend against CRT by pushing slavery was a good thing.
That's it for the show.
Thank you for joining us.
The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
People have to trust me.
I mean, trust the science.
Wear your mask.
Take your vaccine.
Don't ask questions.
Using free speech to free minds.
▲
Export Selection