Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 4, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:01:19

The David Knight Show - 08/04/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Transcription by CastingWords
	Using free speech to free minds.
	Transcription by CastingWords You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Friday the 4th of August.
	You're of Our Lord 2023.
	3.
	Well, today we're going to talk about a wide variety of things.
	We're going to talk about technology.
	We've got some GMO cows and we have a bureaucratic fight as to who gets to get paid off by the genetic modifiers.
	Is it going to be the USDA or is it going to be the FDA? Who gets to have the revolving door and the bribery?
	And then, of course, we get the GMO meat.
	Not just the cows, but also plants that glow.
	LGBT reproduction.
	Without women, of course.
	Who needs a woman? What is a woman, anyway?
	We'll talk also about a new superconductor that's there.
	And we'll talk a little bit about politics.
	We'll get into Pence and the indictment.
	Mike Pence has got some splaining to do.
	He's got some real contradictory statements.
	We'll talk about that.
	As well as a massive increase in myocarditis and what that implies for the five-year survival rate of people who have myocarditis.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, when we look at what is happening with Capitol Hill, just in case you think there's going to be any kind of real changes there, Dianne Feinstein Has surrendered decision-making on legal matters to her daughter.
	Well, that's the headline.
	It's not exactly true.
	But that's what New York Times and Business Insider are running with.
	She's 90 years old.
	There's a big question about her mental competency.
	And now she has signed this power of attorney over to her daughter for all legal affairs.
	This is a woman who's writing our laws, one of the most powerful legislators there, along with Mitch McConnell, who had perhaps a mini-stroke and froze up in front of the cameras while I was gone.
	Seriously, she's not making the legislative decisions, if you look at this.
	You know, the hearing that happened at the same time with Mitch McConnell.
	She came to her turn and she started making a speech and said, no, no, no, at this point you just have to vote yes or no or something like that.
	They had to explain that to her.
	She's not making the decisions here.
	And so the question is really, who is?
	Who is running her, if you will?
	Now again, as I point out, just having a power of attorney agreement there doesn't necessarily mean that she's incompetent.
	She's making these plans.
	She's 90 years old. I mean, a lot of people who are in good health put out a power of attorney agreement just because you never know what's going to happen, right?
	You don't have to be 90 years old to die.
	Tomorrow's not promised to any of us.
	But again, when you look at how much power she has and how little competence she has, it truly is frightening.
	You know, you look at Biden and Feinstein and Fetterman and McConnell and all these people.
	But the reality is that they're just front puppets.
	There are really other people who are controlling them.
	She's one of nine Democrats and eight Republicans, a member of the intelligence community.
	Well, that's convenient for them, isn't it?
	You've got a 90-year-old lady who doesn't really know where she is some of the time, and she's got her eye on the CIA. Yeah, they're being watched.
	All right. No, they're watching us.
	They're watching us. The panel responsible for oversight of the CIA, the NSA, and the rest of the intelligence creeps that are out there Much of what the committee does is not publicly known due to the classified natures of the programs that they oversee.
	So you're not allowed to know if they told you they'd have to kill you.
	But they're going to leak out some information about UFOs.
	By the way, they've changed the, like I said, it's a big tell, isn't it?
	They changed it from UFO to UAP. Now we've got to take it seriously.
	You couldn't say, and you can't say UFO without having a bit of a chuckle or skepticism.
	So let's rebrand it.
	UAP. Unidentified aerial phenomena.
	Now they've changed the A to, and I forget what it was that they changed it to, but they changed it so they can include underwater stuff.
	You know, just in case, you know, the Chinese spy balloons.
	Maybe they have a Chinese spy ship or a spy dolphin or something like that.
	Anyway, Einstein once chaired the committee issuing a review of the CIA's use of torture.
	During the war on terror. Well, I guess, you know, she did what the CIA wanted her to do with that, because she didn't shut anything down, right?
	The lies that light us into the Iraq war.
	She also is on the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee.
	They get to direct millions of dollars in federal spending back to her home state, because that's the reason you get on these committees.
	It's all about grabbing the money.
	Meanwhile, as I talked yesterday about the revolution.
	Yes, a revolution is coming. We're in the midst of it.
	Quite frankly, it's already started.
	It started a few years ago. It started with the financial crisis in the mid-2000s.
	We're well on our way.
	We've only got about another six years before whatever happens, good or bad, is going to be put into place.
	And we need to have a say in this.
	And so people need to understand what is at stake in it.
	Vivek Ramaswamy wants a second American Revolution.
	So I talked about my take on that yesterday.
	Let's talk a little bit about his take on it.
	But before we do, I thought it was very interesting in terms of commenting...
	On this Trump indictment and the whole idea that January the 6th was an insurrection, which it wasn't, and all the rest of this stuff.
	You had on MSNBC Al Sharpton, and he had a very amazing statement.
	About Thomas Jefferson.
	Listen to this. You know, I thought about this as I was looking through the indictment last night.
	And I grew up and started my activism in a section of Brooklyn called Brownsville.
	And walking to the subway many mornings, some of the guys in the neighborhood would say, Rev, I caught a case.
	I have never walked down that block and somebody said, I caught three cases.
	I mean, this is just as low as it gets.
	I've never heard of three cases on one individual in three jurisdictions.
	So this is serious, but on the other side of it, One day our children's children will read American history and can you imagine our reading that James Madison or Thomas Jefferson tried to overthrow the government so they could stay in power?
	That's what we're looking at. We're looking at American history and how it will play out is going to be very important.
	The sad part about this to me is that This is not a man that is facing all this because he believed in a political position or political policy or cause.
	I've seen people go down the wrong side for a cause.
	This is all about him.
	This is narcissism with steroids.
	And to think that he could get this whole country divided and split and commit these crimes...
	Well, I agree with him about that last part.
	This wasn't over principle.
	This wasn't even about him opposing the deep state.
	He was trying to suck up to the deep state in every way that he could.
	He appointed Gina Haspel, who lied his end of the war in Iraq.
	Lies of weapons of mass destruction obtained by torture.
	She covered up the torture he promoted.
	He was trying to do everything he could to join the club.
	The club didn't like him. This is about his narcissism, his ego.
	And so I agree with him on that.
	But can you imagine that? You know, one day we're going to read history.
	Because our kids will read history, he says.
	Because obviously Al Sharpton never has read any history.
	Can you imagine Thomas Jefferson and James Madison trying to overthrow the government?
	Yeah, I can imagine that.
	Yeah, they did it.
	What does he think the American Revolution was about?
	I have no idea where this guy is coming from.
	The other thing I thought was funny was he's talking about catching a case.
	And I thought, Are we talking about COVID here?
	No, I caught a case.
	Meaning I got an indictment.
	They've got a nickname for that in the hood.
	I never met anybody that caught three cases.
	Well, I guess you never met anybody that's been boosted and vaxxed.
	You know, they catch cases all the time.
	Anyway, before we get into it, this article was pretty good.
	It was from Barry Weiss.
	There's an interview with Vivek Ramaswamy, if you want to get an insight into where the guy is coming from.
	I still think the key thing that came out was when he and Elon Musk started getting chummy about an hour and a half into the Musk interview.
	That's when you really saw his worldview.
	It's about money. Money for me, not for my employees.
	Let's bring in some other employees so we can lower the wages and stuff like that from other countries.
	And, you know, I'm an anti-globalist, but I'm all about the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
	Seriously? He's a very intelligent person.
	And there's absolutely no way.
	That he doesn't understand what the Trans-Pacific Partnership is about.
	He's a full-on open-border, open-trade globalist who is running as a libertarian.
	So, yeah, it was Jefferson who said something.
	I don't know. You know, the blood of patriots and tyrants are necessary from time to time to water the tree of liberty.
	I'm paraphrasing it there, but yeah, he would never have a revolution.
	Jefferson wanted revolutions even after the American Revolution.
	He was supporting the Nullification Acts and all the rest of this stuff.
	Anyway, Chris Christie commenting on this is what she begins with.
	She said, you know, a lot of people...
	How is, first of all, how is Ramaswamy, how is he handling the indictment?
	She said different candidates have different approaches to this.
	She said Chris Christie came out swinging, calling Trump and his team.
	The Corleones with no experience.
	We have Fredo Jr.
	is lined up there, you know, to take...
	The Don's Place.
	Pence weighed in. He said today's indictment serves as an important reminder.
	Anybody who puts himself over the Constitution should never be President of the United States.
	And we've got more to say about Mike Pence.
	I think that's a good name for him because he does come across this.
	Very serious and lecturing.
	He does have this pensive look always, so we'll talk more about Mike Pence.
	But the candidates that many think are likely to wrest the nomination from Trump, Tim Scott or Ron DeSantis, she said, condemned it as politically motivated, and so did Ramaswamy, who is currently polling in third place at 7%.
	And, uh...
	What he said about it was, he said, the corrupt federal police just won't stop until they've achieved their mission, eliminate Trump.
	This is un-American, and I commit to pardoning him for this indictment.
	Trump isn't the cause of what happened on January the 6th.
	Oh, really? That's kind of interesting.
	The real cause, and it's different from what he said before, as a matter of fact...
	The real cause was systematic and pervasive censorship of citizens in the year leading up to it.
	If you tell people they can't speak, that's when they scream.
	If you tell people they can't scream, that's when they tear things down.
	Now that's a good quote.
	I like that. The problem is that to say that Trump wasn't responsible for January the 6th and encouraging people to come, you know, it wasn't Trump who did it.
	It was Ray Epps. It was Ray Epps who ran these grifts of Save America and Stop the Steal, making tens of millions of dollars for Alex Jones and $250 million for Trump.
	Those guys didn't do it.
	It was Ray Epps. It was Ray Epps.
	He got everybody to go to Washington on January the 6th.
	But the problem is it goes back even before that.
	Why were people being censored for that entire year?
	And he talks about it in the interview in more depth.
	Why were people being shut down and shut up and locked down?
	It was because of the Trump lockdown.
	And so he doesn't get a pass for that either.
	You know, the very thing that he's talking about here, saying, well, you've got to sit down and shut up.
	You can't say anything about this.
	It wasn't just the election. It was the entire year.
	And later on in the interview, Ramaswamy says that.
	He said, you know, he had everybody locked down.
	Nobody could come out except for BLM, and then they could have riots, and it was okay.
	But nobody else could come out. Yeah, that was a big problem, wasn't it?
	And who did that? Trump.
	So, when you look at what he has to say about the American Revolution, well, first of all, Barry Weiss starts with his backstory.
	And I thought it was kind of interesting because I've not really paid any attention to him until, as I said at the wedding, a very close friend said, you know, what do you think about Ramaswamy?
	And I had just seen the headlines and read the article from Breitbart about the Musk interview that was last Friday.
	And we were talking on Saturday about it.
	And I said, well, you know, the problem is that he's, you know, look at what he says about the TPP, look at what he says about H-1B visas and things like that.
	But then as I look at his backstory...
	And we've talked about the fact that he scrubbed his Wikipedia stuff to try to put a positive spin or eliminate, but just to put a positive spin on the Soros scholarship that he got and what he did with the DeWine COVID team in Ohio.
	But then it goes back beyond that.
	You know, Harvard, Yale graduate, smart guy, a valedictorian of his class in high school.
	But then, where did he get his money?
	Well, it turns out that he had connections with Martin Scarelli.
	Remember that guy? He's very similar to Martin Scarelli in terms of what he didn't commit any fraud like Scarelli did.
	But in terms of the two guys, he's not really a scientist.
	He is an investor in pharmaceuticals.
	So, Ramaswamy is a big pharma guy.
	And actually, he made investments as the corporation that he was in.
	He was not doing science work.
	He was investing in other pharmaceutical companies.
	He had a company that came up with a drug, but it never worked, but they kept selling it and reselling it in the same way that Moderna did.
	There's a lot of money, as I've said in the past, selling hopium on Wall Street.
	You got a story about this new miracle drug that's going to come out and you get people to invest in your company and you make lots of money.
	Tens of millions, hundreds of millions of dollars can be made that way.
	And he did make money that way.
	The drug never worked.
	But he also invested in Martin Scarelli, who, if you remember, amongst other things that Scarelli did, He bought a company that had a drug, and it was being used at the time by people who had AIDS. I don't think that it probably did anything for them, but they thought it was necessary for them to survive, and increased the price of it by a factor of 58 times.
	And he made it as a condition of him buying this company.
	They had this drug, and it was no longer patented, But there was only one company that made it.
	And so he made it a condition of the purchase.
	That they get all the supplies back from everywhere.
	You know, warehouses, pharmacies, and that type of thing.
	Get all of them. Recall them all.
	And make sure there's nothing on the market.
	And then I'm going to, you know, and when he started doing that as part of the purchase agreement, the New York Times was looking at that and they said, well, there's no reason to do that unless you're going to radically raise the price.
	And he did. He made it 58 times more than what it was.
	He had a lot of people who said, well, it's a free market.
	They can do whatever they want. The same way that people defended corporations who censored us and said, well, it's a free market.
	They own the internet.
	They own social media.
	They own these platforms. They can do whatever they want.
	I don't like it. People like John Stossel said, I don't like the censorship.
	They're censoring me, he said.
	I don't like it, but they're corporations, and corporations can do whatever the blank they want, okay?
	Well, no. They don't have superior rights to us, and if they have created a de facto public square, that is a digital public square, and Jack Dorsey said that over and over again, then they don't get to remove public speech in the digital public square, even if it's privately owned.
	And we had the Supreme Court that made that decision in 1946, and they've never changed it.
	And all these subsequent decisions about, well, you can't say this, you can't set up your soapbox in a mall and that type of thing.
	A mall is not the digital, is not the public square.
	The mall is not a public square.
	The mall is retail space.
	And you know more are able to set up a soapbox there than you are to be able to go in and set up a soapbox in Sears if they were still in business.
	But whatever is there now.
	I've gone shopping.
	But anyway, you know, when you look at this, one of the companies that he created...
	Going back to Ramaswamy now, was ROI Vant, Roy Vant.
	He said, yeah, the ROI stands for return on investment.
	It was always about money, money, money.
	You take somebody who's made, who's become a billionaire in the pharmaceutical industry, pursuing more than anything, money, money, money, money, money.
	Does that raise some kind of spidey sense with you?
	It sure does raise a lot of red flags with me about Ramaswamy.
	You know, when you look at his background, I've gone on to found multi-billion dollar companies that created value by doing valuable things for other people, developed five medicines that are FDA approved today, made a lot of money, ROI. R-O-I. Yeah, you remember Wall Street and the Gordon Gekko guy.
	Greed is good. I had a lot of people just defending Martin Shkreli, saying that type of thing.
	I've heard that from a lot of libertarians.
	This is one of the reasons why I say I'm a libertitarian.
	I support liberty. I don't support this Ayn Rand, Gordon Gekko brand of libertarianism where, you know, may the best person win and we don't have any obligation to our fellow man and there is no God and all the rest of this.
	That kind of godless atheism from Ayn Rand, I reject liberty.
	I used to have people, I'd always talk about Liberty and my friends, one of them who went to West Point.
	We'd meet up occasionally, but it got less and less over the years.
	We'd get together and we'd talk.
	He kept telling me, you sound just like Ayn Rand.
	I said, I'm not Ayn Rand.
	I reject that.
	I hate those novels.
	I hate that view of mankind.
	That is the epitome.
	Of godless atheism.
	And so, yeah, I agree with liberty, but not with that godless atheism.
	Anyway, so Barry Weiss says, you say America needs a second revolution.
	Many people hear revolution and they think bloodshed and violence.
	What do you mean by that? What does revolution look like to you?
	Well, he said, to me, that does not mean bloodshed and violence, but it means a revival of the ideals that set this nation into motion in 1776.
	And I do think that we live in a 1776 moment.
	Well, so far, so good.
	He's hitting the right notes on this.
	Like I said, he's a very smart guy.
	He said, I think that the American ideals are very fundamentally radical ideas, self-governance, free speech, like absolute free speech, he said, the idea that you get ahead through unbridled meritocracy, the unbridled pursuit of excellence, the steadfast commitment to the rule of law, rather than to the whims of men.
	And so, it is very much like Ayn Rand libertarianism.
	Because do you see anything in there about morality?
	Do you understand that the purpose of the American...
	What is different about the American government?
	You know, the guys who were the founders, some of them were very wealthy.
	John Hancock was the wealthiest person in the Northeast, maybe in America at the time.
	And so they risked their reputation, their honor.
	That was something that they used to think about.
	We don't think about that anymore.
	So they risked their honor, their fortunes, and their lives in terms of doing this.
	It was different in the sense that they did not enrich themselves after the revolution.
	They identified more with the principles of liberty, and that's the key thing.
	It's not that we have a commitment to the rule of law.
	Where would that commitment come from?
	Well, that commitment would have to come from a moral understanding of things, a kind of moral understanding like James Madison had when he said, men are not angels, so we need government.
	But because men are going to run the government, we've got to have some way to check this, right?
	That came out of a fundamental view of humanity that was Christian.
	That people are fundamentally flawed.
	And, you know, we have a basic sin nature.
	It came out of that.
	But your commitment to the rule of law is only going to come when you're morally accountable.
	Morally accountable to people.
	Morally accountable to God.
	That's why I've said for the longest time, in our society, our godless society that has set itself against God, it's a real red flag if you start talking about God and religion to most people in politics.
	They hate that. Oh, get that out of politics.
	Don't talk about that at all.
	I said, no, what you should be concerned about is not the person who thinks that they're going to answer to God someday.
	You need to be concerned about the person who thinks that they are God or want to be God.
	They want to be some kind of God-like dictator.
	And we got a lot of people like that.
	As a matter of fact, most people are like that.
	Most people, well, I would be a benevolent dictator.
	Let me have the ring of power, you know?
	Straight out of the Lord of the Rings.
	But most of them are Boromirs, right?
	They really, they're not gladreals.
	We had some gladreals who founded this country, but the people we got right now, for the most part, are a bunch of Boromirs.
	Yeah, your commitment to the rule of law needs to be something other than, and here's where Musk and Ramaswamy miss it.
	It has to be something other than greed is good.
	I'm going to come to America, I'm going to go to America, and I'm going to make a fortune.
	And I love that because this place is a free place.
	Well, that's fine.
	And, you know, ambition like that can create a lot of good things for people as side effects.
	Well, it makes that person very rich.
	I understand that. I support that.
	But if that's your only goal, I want to get rich, guess what?
	You're not going to have a commitment to law or to morality because if that's the thing, if it's the love of money that's motivating you, that's the root of all evil.
	And that's going to turn you evil eventually.
	I've got to do this so that I can achieve my number one goal.
	Your number one goal has to be something else.
	You have to have moral people and who understand they're accountable to God and you have to have politicians who understand what the purpose of America is.
	I've said it before and I'll say it again.
	The compass point, the North Star in America, if you look at the Declaration of Independence and what the founders are trying to set up, the thing that they were aiming for was liberty and protection of our God-given rights.
	That's the purpose of government.
	The purpose of government is not to create some kind of a playing field where Musk and Ramaswamy can get rich.
	That's not the purpose of government.
	The purpose of government is to protect our God-given rights.
	And to have people who run that are going to have to think that they are not God.
	Because if they think they're God, they're going to start giving you privileges instead of your God-given rights.
	You're going to have to start asking them permission for everything, which is where we are right now.
	So Barry Weiss says, okay, so what's your chance here?
	Because, you know, Trump is so far ahead.
	You know, if I'm an always-Trumper, why am I going to vote for you when I could vote for Trump?
	Why would I go with New Coke when I could just have Coke?
	And again, Ramaswamy is very clever.
	He says, do you want a two-liter bottle that's been in the fridge and doesn't have the fizz that it did when you first popped the cork?
	Let me stick with your analogy, not mine.
	He says, that's your analogy. That's the real question here.
	He says, I've got fresh legs.
	I'm 37. I'm going further than Trump did, and I think the part that's most persuasive is the truth.
	37% of this country becomes psychiatrically ill, maybe deranged, when Trump is in office.
	It's just a fact. It's like a law of nature in the U.S. in the 2020s.
	Republicans start identifying as Democrats.
	You have people who disagree with things that they otherwise would have agreed with because of the person who's actually articulating the view.
	You have people agreeing with things they would have never agreed with because a particular person happens to be in the White House.
	It's psychological derangement for at least 30% or more of the country.
	And I think our base sees that I'm not having that effect on people, even as I'm saying many of the same things that Trump is saying.
	That was a good answer.
	And it's absolutely true.
	You've got Republicans start identifying as Democrats.
	Look at how many people who worked for Trump are now hardcore Democrats.
	Look at how few people who were in his cabinet will endorse him.
	I mean, it's pretty crazy.
	But it's also pretty crazy and drives me nuts.
	This is what drives me nuts.
	Trump doesn't drive me nuts.
	His supporters do. And the news media does.
	I'll go to these sites like Breitbart and WND and all these other places.
	Infowar is another one. You see all this stuff.
	Look at how bad the vaccine is.
	Look at how bad the lockdowns and the masks were and all the rest of the stuff.
	Look at what is happening with this, this, and this.
	And then they say, but Trump, we've got to save Trump.
	We've got to save Trump. The guy who can't save himself is going to save us.
	The guy who did all these things that they hate.
	And they can't connect the dots and will not connect the dots to him.
	Oh, it's got to be Fauci.
	Well, he loved Fauci.
	He loved Fauci. Never fired him, gave him a medal on the last day as he's leaving.
	So, he says, Barry White says, well, about a third of Americans still think the 2020 election was stolen.
	And I want to look at what you said about this issue.
	In the days following January the 6th, you said, what Trump did last week was wrong, downright abhorrent, plain and simple.
	This is right after it.
	Ramaswamy said this. He said, the breach of the Capitol is a stain on American history.
	She said, you also said...
	Trump victimhood failed the country.
	He lost the election.
	He should have admitted it and moved on.
	As a matter of fact, Wall Street Journal had an editorial that was carried by Drudge, basically said the same thing.
	They said, what they're coming after him for with this indictment is not a crime, and it's a very dangerous precedent.
	That is, though, that we do not support Trump.
	He should have resigned in disgrace, they said.
	But now this is taking it in another really bad direction.
	And that's my feelings exactly.
	I agree with Wall Street Journal.
	I agree with Rama Swami on this thing.
	At least what he said at that point in time.
	He lost the election.
	He should have moved on. And they lost the election.
	The election was over, folks.
	That Monday, December the 14th.
	When you had all of the officially recognized electors.
	The electors had to be officially recognized by the state.
	They couldn't just appoint themselves.
	And when they all turned in their votes on that Monday of December the 14th, I pointed that out and I kept telling people until Alex fired me that Thursday.
	I said, this is done.
	There's nothing left but a grift.
	And I also said it's a trap if you go on January the 6th.
	And I said that up to and including the morning of January the 6th.
	I told people it is a trap.
	It's going to be agent provocateurs there.
	The people who go are going to be trapped.
	But this is also a trap for the entire conservative movement to portray us all as dangerous, violent extremists.
	And, of course, they have continued with that.
	Barry Weiss says, but here's what you're saying now to Ramaswamy.
	You're saying now, quote, it's a mistake to blame January the 6th on Trump.
	It's Ray Epps' fault.
	You know that, right? It's Ray Epps who did it.
	You claim that pervasive censorship is what led to January the 6th and that the 2020 election was stolen in a limited sense.
	It would have been different if Hunter Biden laptop story had not been suppressed.
	And so he goes on to say, yeah, well, I think that was election interference to suppress that.
	But again, it was Trump's Department of Justice, and we knew for years what was going on in Burisma.
	For years we talked about that.
	And I think that the Republicans tried to play it too clever by half.
	They decided they would release all that stuff as an October surprise.
	And it was too late. I've also said, said Ramaswamy, Ramaswamy, That I have seen no evidence of systematic ballot fraud that would have overturned the result of the 2020 election.
	And so it is a mistake for us to conflate a bad decision with illegal behavior.
	It is also different from saying that we're going to pin what happened on that day, which was a deep issue and deep suffering in our country that boiled over on that day, at the feet of one man.
	You know, Ray Epps.
	Tucker and all the rest.
	It was Ray Epps who did this.
	You know that, right? We're making a mistake if we miss the real thing, which is a year of telling people that you have to stay locked down in your basement, you have to shut up or sit down, and you have to do as you're told, unless you're anti-fond BLM, in which case you can burn down the streets of Portland.
	But it was Trump who did that, too, right?
	I wish somebody would ask Ramaswamy what he did on the COVID team.
	I wish somebody would ask him, you know, just forget about this election and forget about Trump for once.
	Just ask him, do you believe that this was a pandemic?
	You know, forget about this stuff about the Wuhan lab.
	Do you believe there was even a pandemic?
	What do you think about the vaccine as a big pharma guy?
	What do you think about the FDA? What should we do about that kind of stuff?
	Is any of this stuff real? And so, he went on to say, I think that they have set an awful precedent for our country.
	That's right. That in the absence of extraordinary leadership from a Republican, who comes next is going to set a very dangerous precedent for the party in power, using police force to indict and to arrest their political opponents.
	I am deeply worried about this, and I am as well.
	Because, you know, it's not just that 30% of the people go absolutely nuts hating Trump.
	You got 30% of the people go absolutely nuts loving Trump.
	The Trump derangement syndrome cuts both ways.
	And Trump has already said, wait until after 2024 when it's my turn.
	You're going to see what I'm going to do.
	These people want a war.
	Both sides want a war.
	Because we're in the middle of a fourth turning.
	All of society is going nuts.
	It's a season. It's a season of life for our society.
	And all of this stuff, this weaponized prosecution of Trump, and it is weaponized prosecution.
	I don't like the guy.
	I don't agree with him. I don't ever want to see him.
	I don't want to see him as dog catcher.
	But this is very dangerous, what they're doing here.
	And I think it's deliberate.
	You know, both of them are playing to their bases.
	Both of them are manipulating stuff, and I would not be surprised.
	I know that they know, you know, about the fourth turning.
	Everybody uses the term millennials.
	And where did that come from? Well, it came from the same guy, Strauss and Howe, who wrote the fourth turning.
	They all know that. They understand the season that we're in.
	The vast majority of the public doesn't.
	They understand exactly what's going on, and that's one of the reasons why they picked 2030.
	They know that that's, you know, the timeframe for this to happen.
	That's when it'll be over.
	We're in the midst of it right now, and it's really going to accelerate.
	And it could accelerate in a very bad way because of this back-and-forth retribution and political Machiavellian prosecutions and persecutions.
	He said, I look at the campaign of Ron DeSantis, and I look at his falling poll numbers, and I look at the fact that he's chosen to die on the hill of library books and Disney.
	And I think even if you think the culture war matters, well, does Rama Swami think that it matters?
	Even if you think that.
	Even if you think that library books and Disney matter.
	What a trivialization of that.
	I think that characterization of the issues that DeSantis is right on, I think that kind of trivialization is just as despicable as what Trump did, calling him sanctimonious, saying that the protection of babies was too harsh.
	He says, I think even if you think the cultural war matters, does it actually matter to ordinary voters?
	Oh, so we should not be leaders, but we should be followers of what the mob wants.
	Is that correct? We don't have moral standards of protecting children from mutilation, from vivisection, from sexualization and grooming.
	We don't have any standards about that, Ramaswamy.
	And so he says, I wrote ink, woke ink, he says, at a time when everyone advised me not to even use that word in the title because nobody knew what it meant.
	And so, you know, actually, I'm sorry, that characterization was Barry Weiss, even if you think that matters.
	He didn't say that. She said that.
	Let me clarify that. But he said, you know, I talked about this other stuff.
	I talked about things relating to identity.
	He does not say that it matters, by the way.
	And of course, he's not going to defend his opponent, DeSantis.
	But he doesn't talk in this interview as soon as she brings up those issues.
	Of Disney and LGBT grooming and what's going on in the schools and the books and the rest of the stuff.
	She does not respond to that.
	He just leaves that there and he starts talking about racial identity, gender identity, he said, identity in relation even to the climate.
	He said, these are important issues because they give us a lens into what is going on in our country.
	We're starved for purpose and we're starved for meaning and for identity.
	I don't call it the culture war.
	He said, the real cancer that I'm talking about is the void.
	The black hole of purpose and meaning and identity.
	He said a lot of poison is going to fill that void.
	And yes, that poison could be wokeism, transgenderism, climateism, covidism, globalism.
	Barry Weiss says it's going to be Trumpism.
	He says any ism.
	He's not going to go there.
	But it also might be depression, anxiety, fentanyl, suicide, all of these things, he said.
	So Barry Weiss comes back and she puts a point on it.
	She says so. You think people are desperately trying to fill an existential, maybe a God-shaped hole inside of them?
	Is that right? He lays this out there, but he doesn't go there, really.
	He says, well, that's the premise of my candidacy.
	He says, that is my diagnosis of our country, and that is a void that we must fill.
	I don't see any single other candidate stepping up to fill that void.
	Now, see, he doesn't talk about God filling that void.
	It's Barry Weiss who does.
	How are we going to fill that void?
	We're going to go gung-ho America?
	Is that going to fill your void?
	Isn't that just another ism?
	Yeah, what do we do about that?
	Do politicians have the answer for that?
	Do we want to go to a kind of patriotic, secular humanism?
	Greed is good. Let's all make a lot of money.
	That's what America is about, right?
	Is that really going to fill that void?
	Is that going to give people purpose?
	I've said that many times about Hillary Clinton.
	You know, she talks about the politics of meaning because politics gives meaning to her life.
	That's what her life is about.
	I said, what a desperate, sad person she is if Hillary Clinton gets meaning out of politics.
	Just as science cannot give us eternal life, as it continues to promise with all these pharmaceuticals and health advances and everything.
	Science cannot give us eternal life.
	Transhumanism is not going to work for these people.
	And you know, politics cannot give meaning to life without God.
	It is that God-shape hole.
	Barry Weiss nailed it.
	He didn't seem to respond to that.
	He said, we need to embrace the radicalism of the American Revolution, the radicalism of those ideals of putting our nation first.
	Yeah, again, is it putting your nation first to do a TPP? Is it putting your nation first to open up more H-1B visas so you can lower the pay of other people?
	But, of course, at the same time, Ramaswamy and Musk want their intellectual property and the corporations protected from competition abroad.
	They want protectionism for their companies, but no protection for the people who work for them.
	No, the purpose of the nation is to protect our liberties.
	The purpose of the nation is to protect our God-given rights.
	And guess what? When you remove God from the equation, you won't have any rights.
	That's the pragmatic result of removing God.
	He goes on to say, Our diversity is not our strength.
	Our strength is what unites us across our diversity.
	Now, forget about diversity.
	It doesn't help us one way or the other.
	He's right about that. But you need to have politicians who focus not on some kind of make America great deal.
	We need to not be focused on safety, on money.
	The purpose of government is to defend our God-given rights.
	End of story. CIA is moderating Wikipedia, says former editor.
	Wikipedia is one of many tools used by the U.S. liberal establishment and the intelligence community to wage information warfare, says the co-founder Larry Singer, as he was being interviewed by Glenn Greenwald.
	He said, I founded this in 2001, but it has now become an instrument of control in the hands of the left liberal establishment, amongst which he counts the CIA, the FBI, and other intelligence agencies.
	He said, we do have evidence that as early as 2008, the CIA and the FBI were being used to edit Wikipedia.
	Do you think they stopped doing that after we found out about it?
	No. You know, it's always been said, and I've said it, you know, when you look at the internet, if it's free, you are the product, right?
	But it's worse than that.
	If it's free, you are the target.
	You may be the target of advertising, or you may be the target of the FBI. But you are the target.
	And they are doing geospatial intelligence.
	They're doing anticipatory intelligence, trying to predict whether or not you are going to oppose them in some way or the other.
	You see, you are not the product.
	You are the target. You are the suspect.
	And the internet, and especially sites like Wikipedia and social media sites, These were designed and created to make you the target, to make you the suspect, to watch everything that you're doing, and to grab everything that you, the life log idea.
	Activity by the CIA and the FBI on Wikipedia was first made public by a programming student Virgil Griffith in 2007, he developed a program called Wikiscanner that could trace the location of computers used to edit Wikipedia articles.
	And he found out that the CIA and the FBI and a host of large corporations and government agencies were scrubbing the online encyclopedia of any incriminating information that they didn't want.
	CIA computers were used, for example, to remove casualty counts from the Iraq War, while an FBI machine was being used to remove aerial and satellite images of Guantanamo Bay Prison in Cuba.
	CIA computers were used to edit hundreds of articles, including entries on then-Iranian President Ahmadinejad, China's nuclear program, And the Argentine Navy.
	Why is that in there? I didn't know that they had a Navy.
	I thought it was sunk during the Falklands War.
	I thought they sunk both of the ships during the Falklands War.
	Argentine Navy. Anyway, some edits were more petty.
	CIA former Chief William Colby apparently edited his own entry to expand his list of accomplishments.
	A singer told Greenwald, he said, the intelligence agencies pay off the most influential people to push their agendas, which they're already mostly aligned with.
	Or they just develop their own talent within the intelligence community.
	They learn the Wikipedia game.
	Then they push what they want to say with their own people.
	A greater part of intelligence and information warfare is conducted online on websites like Wikipedia.
	Well, great. I'm glad that they understand that.
	And, of course, you know, as we see this information and what happened with Facebook, which they go on to talk about, the result of all this is that the people who are going to protect us, the Republicans, like Jim Jordan, he's going to have a hearing.
	He's going to have a hearing. They've known all this stuff.
	They've known it for years, but they're going to have a grandstand hearing on Facebook.
	And then they will do absolutely nothing about it.
	All they're doing is feathering their nest for a follow-up career on Fox News.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	We'll be right back.
	The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	You hear the theme from Jurassic Park.
	You know, they start out so heroic with such noble ideals.
	And then the unexpected happens.
	And they're not trying to bring back dinosaurs yet.
	I mean, you've got some people out there trying to bring back the woolly mammoth and some other things like that.
	But... They're trying to do a lot to our food supply.
	Constantly looking at genetic modification.
	And it's going to be a very big issue.
	There is a political turf battle right now over cows.
	As the Wall Street Journal put it in the headline, the political turf battle over the future of your prime rib.
	These people are fighting.
	The FDA and the U.S. Department of Agriculture are fighting over who gets to get the bribes from the companies.
	That's what we're really talking about here.
	Yeah, the future of genetically modified bacon, steak, and fish is at the center of a Washington food fight, says Wall Street Journal.
	You see, the question is not whether or not it should be done, which is the question that Michael Crichton talked about with Jurassic Park.
	He said, you never stop to ask, you know, whether it should be done.
	You talked about what you could do and how you could do it, but you never talked about whether or not it should be done.
	These people don't care. Neither the FDA nor the USDA are questioning whether or not this should be done.
	And you need to understand that this genetic modification, CRISPR, is not a scalpel.
	It is not at all the way it was portrayed in Jurassic Park.
	And we got some... Super microscope, and you go in and you slice it here and you slice it here and you slice something else in there.
	They're piggybacking a sequence onto a bacteria with CRISPR-Cas9.
	And somehow, because the mechanisms that God has put in place with this unbelievable design of information that is there, somehow it just kind of rubs off, you know, and it puts itself in there, but it's not exact.
	And you get things that happen downstream from that.
	The way it was characterized by some people who were doing it in Texas.
	They said, well, you know, we've always in the past we've used selective breeding.
	And you can get an amazing variation with selective breeding.
	Just take a look at domestic dogs, for example.
	Everything from chihuahuas to Irish wolfhounds.
	And all different types of characteristics and intelligence and specialized things.
	You know, very radical difference in appearance and all the rest of this stuff.
	That was all selective breeding.
	But you can make it go very, very fast if you do genetic modification.
	You can think of it as selective breeding on warp speed and with similar results as to what we got from Operation Warp Speed.
	A lot of unintended consequences, assuming that their intentions were good.
	And so it not only allows you to speed up the process, But it also allows you to bring in things that are completely foreign.
	You know, when the Bible in Genesis talks about kinds of animals, you know, it's talking about a kind of animal, you would think about all the different types of cats, from domestic house cats to lions and tigers and leopards and cheetahs and all the rest.
	Those are all cats. We all look at that as cats, right?
	You can look at the same thing.
	You know, you get domestic dogs and wolves and coyotes and, you know, all these different types of things.
	They're all dog types.
	Well, this isn't even crossing a dog with a cat.
	This, you can cross an animal with something from the plant kingdom.
	And we'll talk about that.
	You know, they've got, take some genes from some bacteria or some bugs and make plants glow in the dark when certain things happen, that type of thing.
	So you're crossing over between different kingdoms, if you will.
	You know, we have the plant kingdom, we have the animal kingdom.
	They all have DNA. They all have a common designer.
	Isn't it amazing? You know, they pushed it so hard when I was in school to say, well, look at this.
	You know, we're going to make these different classifications.
	We've got vertebrates and we have invertebrates.
	And we can prove that evolution is true because, look, the skeletons are similar.
	And it's like, well, that doesn't prove anything.
	That doesn't prove that it came from one another.
	It proves, perhaps, that there's a common designer that has a similarity in design.
	And it gets far more than that.
	I mean, they were trying to make a case revolution by looking at comparative anatomy of skeletons and things like that.
	Take a look at DNA. DNA is all animals.
	Forget the skeleton. The core is the DNA, not the skeleton.
	And so, it's all animals have DNA. And all plants have DNA. Did we evolve from a Venus flytrap or something?
	Maybe some of the politicians did.
	I don't know. But gene-edited cattle have a major screw-up in their DNA. This is from MIT Technology Review.
	As I said, one of the guys who was doing this said, don't think of CRISPR as a scalpel.
	Think of it as a chainsaw.
	We're getting a lot of garbage and unintended consequences in other areas.
	And here's an example out of this.
	A company called Recombinetics out of St.
	Paul, Minnesota. A gene editing company that made hornless cattle.
	The animals were messengers of a new era of better, faster, molecular farming.
	Cue the Jurassic Park music.
	This same outcome could be achieved by breeding in the farmyard, they said, but this is faster.
	And it's precision breeding.
	And so these cows were on the cover of magazines and everything, you know, posing for magazines.
	Just like a pop star or something.
	They were poster animals for gene editing revolution.
	Story after story about the success of modifying these dairy cattle so they had no horns.
	And again, that's something that you could easily do.
	With selective breeding, it has been done for some breeds, but it takes a long time.
	But they also got some unintended consequences.
	FDA scientists eventually had a closer look at the genome sequence of the edited animals.
	A bull named Burry, they discovered that his genome contained a stretch of bacterial DNA, Including a gene that conferred antibiotic resistance.
	Now, does this transfer if you eat?
	Well, they don't think so, but who knows, right?
	And perhaps this would be a big issue even for the cattle industry.
	It might mess up their herd immunity.
	Which, by the way, was never about vaccines.
	The term herd immunity was essentially another way of restating Farr's law about the bell-shaped curve.
	Anyway, I've covered that before.
	But that's the two issues here.
	When you talk about genetic modification versus selective breeding, you're doing it so that you can go at warp speed.
	But the downside of this is you may get...
	And of course, for some of them, it's deliberate that they have some chimera types of things brought in.
	You know, this is not going to be strictly, you know, cattle to cattle.
	We're going to bring in some other things, you know, from plants, animals, or bugs.
	And they got the bug DNA in there by...
	Mistake. I guess you could say they had a bug in their editing software.
	And that bug got right into the DNA. The unintended addition of DNA from a different species occurred during the gene editing process itself, the government says.
	It went undetected by the company, even as it touted the animals as 100% bovine, and it assailed the FDA for saying that the animals needed to be regulated at all.
	Now you see, in this particular case, the FBI was doing very, very due diligence.
	They were very careful about this.
	They wanted to find a problem with this as badly as they do not want to find a problem with the mRNA vaccines.
	And so they were looking at this stuff literally under the microscope.
	Not that you can see the DNA, but you know, they were examining it very, very carefully because they wanted to make a case About how we can't have a Wild West in this stuff.
	And I agree with that.
	It's very concerning to see how the news came out of this Chinese lab in a garage where they're doing genetic editing and all the rest of the stuff.
	That is a real concern.
	Because one of the things is that CRISPR allowed people to do genetic modification even if they don't do it well.
	Even if there are unintended consequences.
	It allowed them to do it In a way and at a cost that had previously never been there before.
	And so it's opened this up to garage operations, if you will.
	People who have malevolent intentions.
	You don't have to have a Wuhan lab to create something that is very dangerous with genetic modification.
	It was not something that was expected and so we didn't look for it, said the company that owns the animals.
	Gene editing isn't yet as predictable or as reliable as promoters say, says the MIT Technology Review.
	Of course, as I pointed out, cattle industry said this as well.
	Instead, the procedure meant to make pinpoint changes to DNA can introduce significant unexpected changes without anybody noticing it.
	And let me say this, that once the FDA has established, they wanted to prove that they're going to do a better job of monitoring this stuff than the USDA. The USDA has always been in charge of meat, for example.
	That's why there's the turf war.
	You know, they're talking about animals, you know, eating animals.
	And that's where, that's the, you know, the domain of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the USDA. USDA approved and that type of thing.
	Even though the FDA has food in the title, They've not been involved with meat.
	They get involved with other aspects of food and doing inspection, which, by the way, could and should be done locally at the state or local level.
	We don't need an FDA for anything.
	Nothing. But they're trying to show how necessary their position is and how they do a better job of policing this than the corporation did or that the U.S. Department of Agriculture did.
	And so that's what this story is about.
	But at least they found this problem.
	Let me tell you, if the FDA is successful, or whichever agency gets it, whether it's the FDA or the USDA, they're not going to go through this kind of due diligence to find any of this stuff.
	It'll be payola, just like it is right now with the pharmaceutical companies.
	A Syrian girl says on Rockfin, I wouldn't want to see Trump as a dog catcher either.
	I like dogs too much. That's right.
	Free the dogs. Free the January the 6th people.
	I'm all for it.
	On Rumble. Narroway, Narrowgate Ministry.
	Dewey, Cheatham, and Howe.
	The new lawyers for Trump.
	Yeah. And the Marx Brothers.
	Yeah. I like that.
	Anyway. The risk of haphazard engineering isn't just to barnyard animals, of course.
	Genome editing treatments to cure rare diseases are being tested on people.
	And it is possible that patients will end up with unexplained genetic mutations.
	This is why I will not be taking any genetically modified medicines.
	And there's not just a pragmatic aspect to that.
	But it's also a religious aspect of that.
	You know, we are supposed to do diligence to take care of our bodies.
	I don't do a good job of that in most circumstances.
	But I can at least stay away from genetic modification.
	That's one that's easy to do.
	I could exercise more.
	I could sleep more. But I'm not going to do the genetic modification.
	That's where I draw the line. Unintended consequences are a particular concern in connection with attempts to modify human children before birth with gene editing, as occurred for the first time in China.
	That is called seed editing.
	I've had situations where they've gone in and given certain characteristics to adult animals, and those characteristics will be temporary with a genetic modification.
	But if you do it while the child is young, developing, right, before the child is born, if you do it, you know, in the embryo stage, then any changes that you make are permanent for that child.
	And not only that, but they will be passed along to subsequent generations.
	That's why I recommend that you read it.
	You don't read the entire book.
	The book is good. Daniel Suarez's Change Agent, the very opening scene, I think, is one of the most classic scenes to lay out the issue of sea change.
	Of the pressure that we all see in terms of an arms race or a technology race between different countries, how they get drawn into this dangerous stuff like this.
	But he does it on a basis of a husband and wife in the future going to an underground black market genetic modification thing and the guy is trying to sell them different characteristics that they can add to their child.
	And the way he sets this thing up in the novel is one parent is for it, the other one is against it, and he's kind of answering their objections or feeding their desires.
	And he tells them, you know, well, yeah, this is really expensive.
	I know, I hear you, it's really expensive.
	But you know, other people are going to be doing it.
	And he says, so you've got a choice.
	Your child can either be enhanced in these different ways.
	Longevity, physical ability, mental ability, you know, all these different things.
	Or, they can be a disadvantage and a slave to all the rest of these people who are doing it.
	And not only that, but if you do this, if you spend this money to make these modifications to your developing child here, that'll be passed on to your grandchildren and your great-grandchildren, and they will bless you for it, right?
	It doesn't go to that, but yeah.
	It's an interesting, very interesting back and forth there.
	But that is the fundamental issue that all these people are looking at.
	And that's what's pushing this forward.
	The fear of missing out.
	The fear of being left behind.
	So it's not clear if the bacterial DNA poses a larger risk, says MIT Technology Review.
	And we don't know, right?
	And we don't know there might be some other stuff that they haven't seen yet.
	It's unlikely to affect the cow or the person who eats it, but instead the concern is that the antibiotic-resistant gene could be taken up by any of the billions of bacteria present in the cow's gut or the body.
	John Heritage, a retired microbiologist from Leeds University, says that he doesn't see a large chance of the gene jumping further, but he says its presence in the cow could create unpredictable opportunities for it to spread.
	We just don't know, right? And we can't wait to find out.
	Just like the Trump shots.
	Got to have it now. Just like even the new technology to replace the technology for our energy infrastructure, our transportation infrastructure.
	We can't wait to get it right.
	We've got to just shut down what we've got right now.
	And that's the key thing.
	The genetic modification that is being done to plants and animals to our food supply, it could have negative effects for us as we consume those foods, but it could also have a negative effect in the sense that it could destroy the food supply.
	You can make it very vulnerable to something that is unforeseen.
	The discovery that some of the harmless, I'm sorry, hornless, not harmless, but hornless, animals have unwanted DNA from another species has now sealed their fate.
	No one is going to win any regulatory approval for them now.
	Already regulatory agencies in Brazil have rejected a revised petition by recombinetics in response to these animals.
	And of course, again, it is not just...
	That, we've got the U.S. Department of Agriculture has approved a GMO soybean plant that, listen to this, emits radio frequency to monitor conditions and is also fluorescent.
	You see, this is the kind of strange Frankenstein mixture of different things, the chimera aspect of it.
	This is not just mixing, you know, different strains of soybean to get different characteristics as we've always done with selective breeding.
	No, this is a soybean plant that emits radio frequency so that you can monitor its condition.
	If it starts getting too dry or it's under distress or something, it sends out a radio frequency, the stress signal, and it glows in the dark too.
	The company is called Interplant.
	The proteins emit optical signals that are detectable as far away as space.
	And it shows farmers exactly what kind of help the plants need within 48 hours of a stress onset.
	Two weeks before you can see the stress in the field.
	So, you know, when a plant is under stress, drought or something like that, it's going to show up eventually, it's going to start withering.
	But before that ever happens, these people can see it optically with a signal.
	And our plant's new category of seed technology delivers traits that tap directly into the plant's physiology.
	Well, there you go.
	What about our physiology when we eat these things?
	Moreover, the plant is bioluminescent and can glow in the dark.
	You've seen the types of things that the beaches where people disturb the sand or the water and you see the bacteria that glow bright blue, that type of thing.
	I don't know what color the soybean things are going to do, but they're setting this up for commercial release in 2025.
	Even though the trials are scheduled for 2024, they will then release it.
	Commercially within a year.
	Because this is going to be done in the same way that we've seen these other things.
	They're going to just rubber stamp it and let it go through.
	We already know that. That's how this is going to work.
	And then one more genetic issue before we take a break.
	We have a company that is making lab-grown human eggs so they can make synthetic babies so that homosexual men can have kids.
	Who needs a woman? What is a woman anyway?
	We don't know, right?
	You don't need those people with a womb.
	A new pill for the morning after, right, is another one that they're talking about.
	A morning after pill that's not about an abortion, but they also have a new morning after pill to stop sexually transmitted disease.
	That's the other pill that they're talking about putting out there.
	I've got, you know, there is an old-fashioned way to make sure you don't get sexually transmitted disease.
	That is abstinence outside of marriage.
	But we can't do that, so let's get a pill from pharmaceutical companies.
	But going back to the egg thing, where else but San Francisco?
	Would you expect to see this coming out?
	A San Francisco-based biotech company wants to revolutionize the birthing process by artificially creating babies in a Petri dish dish.
	And then incubating them.
	Now, they still, at this point, they still do need a woman.
	They need to rent a womb for the baby to develop.
	But you've got other people who are working on artificial wombs.
	So we can go full Brave New World.
	So the government can control reproduction.
	You see, there's a real...
	All this stuff fits very well.
	All this LGBT agenda fits very well.
	It fits well within their depopulation agenda.
	It also fits very well within their Brave New World agenda where they control how many people, what kind of people, the conditions of the people.
	The in vitro gametogenesis.
	Would give women the opportunity to have children well into their 40s and 50s, they said.
	But primarily, this is a critical platform for male-to-male couples to have biological children.
	So, you know, even having children late in your life, I can tell you from experience, it's a lot tougher the longer you wait.
	Wow. We can tell you about that if you want to know about it.
	It gets really tough as you get older.
	It's not just a sleep deprivation, but it's all the other issues as well.
	So they said, it would allow widespread genetic screening of embryos.
	Well, there you go. Eugenics.
	Or the movie, if you saw the science fiction film, Gattaca, I think it was.
	Yeah. We can go full Brave New World, all the rest of this stuff.
	We can eliminate and reduce the risk of devastating diseases for future generations, they say.
	But you know how they would use it.
	Assuming that the technology works.
	The co-founder told NPR, of course, you know, NPR loves this kind of stuff.
	I personally think that what we're doing will probably change many aspects of society as we know it.
	Yeah, they're already changing many aspects of society as we know it in San Francisco without doing any kind of genetic modification.
	They're doing cultural and spiritual modification of America.
	It's really exciting to be working on a technology that can change the lives of millions of humans, he said.
	There's something intrinsic about sharing a life that is half me and half my husband, he said.
	I don't have that capacity right now.
	I'm devoting my life to trying to change that.
	As in the days of Noah.
	Matt Krysaloff, another co-founder, said my personal biggest interest in it Is that it can allow same-sex couples to be able to have biological children together.
	So there you go. We're going to go into the Brave New World hatcheries.
	We're going to go into genetic engineering and eugenics and population control.
	And the justification for all of it is homosexual men.
	There you go. It really is crazy how homosexuality feeds into every insane deviancy that these people are into.
	It's at the root of so many of these things.
	Oh, Brave New World hatcheries?
	It's for the gay guys. Yeah, yeah.
	So it's good. It's good.
	You know, pedophilia, that's bad.
	But hey, if they do it for transgenderism and if it's being done with drag queens, it's good.
	It's good. You know, kids can't go into a strip bar and they shouldn't.
	But now we're going to waive all those rules because we've got some gay guys that are doing all this stuff.
	I don't want them seeing women doing that, but gay guys, you know, that's just perfect.
	Rockfin, thank you very much for the tip, Doug.
	I appreciate that. Trickle down Duganomics.
	And on Rockfin, Jason Barker.
	Jason's going to be joining us in the third hour.
	Hey, Jason. So Gates is our largest owner of farmland now.
	I wonder if he's tied into all of this.
	Yeah, you better believe that he's got some irons in that fire.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	Music is not working for some reason.
	Now we'll take a look at the Stream Deck and find out what is happening with us.
	Let's talk a little bit about what I was going to do when we came back.
	We'll just go ahead into it right now.
	Let's talk a little bit about what is happening with superconductors, if I can find that on here.
	Oh, I can't. So let's talk about cars.
	Right now, they are making some big moves in terms of cars.
	Actually, I know where it is now.
	I'm going to go over to this other folder here.
	Hang on. This is the problem with going paperless and having your machine fail on you.
	So let's talk a little bit about what is happening with the superconductors.
	There's been a lot of talk on social media about this.
	It's a new substance called LK99. A lot of hype about it, okay?
	If possible, maybe even more hype than with artificial intelligence, but it hasn't caught on much bigger than that.
	So the...
	The claim that a new superconductor works at room temperature and at ambient pressure.
	Now this is a big deal because of course always superconductors have only worked at near absolute zero.
	And they have some amazing capabilities because the part about superconductor means that it's essentially zero resistance.
	If you put a current into something that is like this as a superconductor, it's just going to stay there.
	You can store that electricity there without any losses.
	Or you could use superconductors for very long transmission lines.
	It is truly a revolutionary thing, and as one person who talked about different applications of it, said it's insanely bullish for humanity.
	If the claims are true, the world could be nearing the type of superconductor that some experts liken to the invention of the transistor.
	I think it would be even bigger.
	Now, this was a breakthrough that came from some South Korean researchers Just to put it in perspective, they have been getting some incremental improvements with superconductors by doing them at super high temperatures, very, very high temperatures.
	And again, that still is not something that is practical for most devices.
	But they've been able to, they're extending this into more and more areas that are still not a practical range for people to use, but they're bringing that down.
	But last month you had a couple of South Korean researchers publish papers, had two new papers, on what they say is a groundbreaking achievement, saying that it was at room temperature and ambient pressure.
	And so what had happened, we had not heard anything about that really, But then you had a Chinese group try to reproduce this, and did to some degree.
	And so that's why people started talking about it, because that's the way science is done.
	You have somebody who makes a claim about something, and you have other people, okay, let me see if I can reproduce what you said you did.
	And if they can, then okay, it's for real.
	And if they can't, then okay, forget about it.
	These people made a mistake.
	So they said that in this particular case, the Chinese company said, well, we were able to get certain aspects of it, but not at ambient temperature.
	It was at a temperature that was very far removed from absolute zero, but certainly not at room temperature.
	One person who is an analyst for a securities group that was looking at this said, while there is no timetable for commercialization of room temperature ambient pressure superconductor, if it can be successfully commercialized in the future, it will have a revolutionary impact on product design in the field of computers, consumer it will have a revolutionary impact on product design in the
	Technological and material innovations of computers and consumer electronics are aimed at achieving high-speed computing, high-frequency, high-speed transmission, and miniaturization, and all of these are characteristics of the superconducting state, which means that electrical resistance disappears.
	And it will revolutionize the existing product design and material technology adoption.
	Things such as thermal system that is no longer needed.
	Optical fiber high-end would be replaced.
	The entry barrier of an advanced node is lower.
	Even mobile devices as small as an iPhone could have the computing power comparable to a quantum computer.
	So there's a lot of excitement about this.
	But then the claims that this is going to happen at room temperature again did not come true when they tried to reproduce this.
	They were able to get it to operate at minus 163 degrees centigrade, not at room temperature touted by the original paper.
	But still, you're starting to get into the area there where they said some ambient temperatures there, minus 163 degrees.
	You're still starting to get into the area where you've got dry ice and that type of stuff.
	But it is still so cold that it's not practical for all purposes.
	But it is a huge breakthrough.
	They looked at the materials' conductor properties.
	They set a very interesting electronic properties on this.
	It is called LK99. It's a combination of something called lanarkite and copper phosphide.
	They bake it for four days.
	It's a multi-step, small batch, solid-state synthesis process.
	That somebody was able to reproduce over a kitchen counter in Russia.
	So again, this is another one of these deals, kind of like CRISPR, you know, where people can, if they're careful with what they're doing, they don't need to have special laboratory facilities to do this.
	And that may be part of the issue as they, you know, followed this.
	Maybe they didn't do it exactly the same way as the South Koreans did.
	It also shows not just superconductivity, but it also has what they call the Meissner effect, which results in the levitation of materials.
	Oh, there you go.
	Because like a maglev field, you talk about maglev super rail trains where they can push these things along with alternating currents of electricity, creating a magnetic levitating effect so you can accelerate things incredibly fast.
	As a matter of fact, if you go back and look at the book that Jeff Bezos wrote, Love that gave him his ideas and how he wanted to set up space stations and all the rest of this stuff.
	High Frontiers by Gerard K. O'Neill.
	I also liked that book quite a bit when I was in engineering.
	That was when we still believed that people had gone to the moon.
	But we can't get back there for some reason.
	I don't know for the last 50, 60 years.
	But... But what he talked about was setting up a moon base where they could...
	You know, get materials and that type of thing.
	Setting up a processing center, because there's five Lagrange libration points, which are gravitationally neutral points between the Moon and the Earth.
	And there's two of them that are on either side of the Moon, and so they put stuff there in those gravitationally neutral areas.
	They're not going to have a decaying orbit, and they're not going to fall to either the Moon or to the Earth.
	And so they could set up manufacturing facilities there, They could paint them black if they wanted to make them really hot, just to get the sunlight there.
	They could paint them white if they wanted to make them super cold, and you get that temperature differential, and you can do a lot of things with manufacturing.
	You'd be able to go through and strip mine the moon, because so far Greta Thunberg hasn't been there yet.
	And you could take the material, and you could use maglev.
	This is why I'm talking about this. You could use maglev to accelerate this stuff really fast.
	And get so much energy into it that you could hurl this material up to the Lagrange libration points we had the manufacturing happening.
	You make whatever it is that you want, manufacture it in space.
	You don't have to worry about the EPA. They'll find a way to get there eventually, but have a few years of freedom before they find a justification to do their thing.
	And then after you get finished, you just drop ship it.
	You just push it off to the Earth.
	Gravity will bring it to the Earth.
	So I guess that's where Jeff Bezos got the idea of dropshipping stuff for Amazon.
	But anyway, you know, the Maglev stuff is really pretty amazing and could be used for humans.
	They slow it down quite a bit so we don't turn into jelly when they shoot us out.
	And, okay, so the drive that we record to holds all the clips, had an issue, and broke the connection.
	So these things should be working again, says Travis.
	We'll see when I get finished with this.
	But there's still caveats, they said.
	It's strange that two teams verified different parts of the superconducting requirements, but no team has successfully verified both of them at this time, which is what South Koreans said.
	And they also have not been able to do it at room temperature.
	They said, one of the professors himself said that while this is promising, it looks like this is not the breakthrough that we're looking for.
	It's still going to be a few years out.
	But it is, you know, we have these types of things happening all the time.
	And I guess one of the things that really caught my imagination was to think, well, what if this were practical?
	What if this was at room temperature?
	And they were able to do this.
	And there was a long stream that was put out by a person named Andrew Cote.
	And he said, to understand this, think of electrons normally bouncing off of everything as they fall, Plinko style.
	In a superconductor, they glide smoothly.
	To make electrons glide, either you cool them down a lot or you squeeze them together.
	Therefore, you can sort of trade off pressure for temperature.
	And so the idea behind this thing was you didn't have to have pressure or temperature.
	It just somehow miraculously worked with these materials, these quantum materials.
	And so, you know, again, they were able to, normally they would have to cool stuff down to minus 454 degrees Fahrenheit.
	This worked at just 273 degrees Fahrenheit when the other teams tried to reproduce it.
	It wasn't certainly a long way from room temperature, but they went a long way for that.
	And I guess the thing, as I said, that really struck me was when he started talking about in this long thread on Twitter about the different applications for it.
	He said, for example, if you think about transformation and distribution of energy, you know, originally when they came up with electricity, You had a competition between Tesla and between Edison.
	And, you know, one of them wanted to do...
	Tesla had the bright idea, and it was a bright idea, to use alternating current.
	That's why they step the voltage up so much, because for the same amount of power, if you step the voltage up, then the current is going to go down for the same amount of power.
	And your line losses are based on the current.
	So, they were able to, by using step-up transformers, which is the system that we still use today, Tesla came up with that.
	Not Elon Musk, but the real Tesla.
	And so, you know, that was the system that he came up with.
	And Edison did everything he could to vilify it.
	It's dangerous. You'll get electrocuted with alternating current and that type of thing.
	But it's still a lot of losses there.
	He says, well, you'd be able to eliminate these transmission line losses, but he said the big thing is not even the transmission line losses.
	The even bigger thing would be that with the superconductors, you'd be able to eliminate the 35-40% losses that you have with generation, generating the power.
	And he also pointed out that...
	Again, you know, when we talk about batteries and we talk about the issues of being able to store massive amounts of power for the grid, which is essential, and they don't have this capability for the renewable energy, things like solar and wind.
	But with this, if you had a superconductor thing, you could just put the energy in there and let it circulate around so that it might...
	Solve the problems that they have in terms of energy storage for that.
	Would solve the problems for energy storage for a lot of different devices, not just the grid.
	He said also you'd have advanced MRI capability.
	Because it would be able to produce a much stronger magnetic field and other things like that.
	Of course, we don't know what the health implications of that would be.
	But he says they'd estimate that something like this would increase MRI by about a factor of 12.
	You'd also have the high-speed maglev trains.
	We've mentioned that before.
	And then you would have electronic sensors that would be incredibly...
	Sensitive, you would have quantum computing, maybe even brought down to a small computer, or maybe even to your handheld computer.
	And so we start looking at these things that might even affect nuclear fusion.
	Who knows, we might even get a Mr. Fusion, you know, Mr.
	Fusion, and be able to magnetically levitate, just like Back to the Future.
	We should look at most of these things.
	Let's start looking at them.
	It's gotten to the point now, as I've said before, we were warned about the military industrial complex and the academic complex by Eisenhower.
	And he warned us that the government was going to take over all research and they were going to turn it to their purposes, not to our purposes, as we see being done over and over again.
	Seems like everything that comes out, most of it is research that's being targeted by the government.
	Just take a look at the brain-computer interfaces that are being done by Elon Musk and by Bill Gates and these people all bought into the brain-computer interfaces.
	And is that really something that we want or is that something that they want?
	They're able to go back in, the latest article I saw about that, they said, well, look at this, we can scan your brain from a distance here, and we can tell what music you're listening to.
	Now, they don't take it down to a particular tune, but they said, we can look at this and...
	Rumble, thank you, McKeep, for the tip.
	He says, the moon comment is definitely worth $5.
	I don't know what I said about the moon, but thank you.
	I appreciate that. Get a cup of coffee.
	Thank you so much. But they're looking at, by looking at your brain waves and measuring them, and of course, they'll be able to do that much more sensitively with superconductors that operate at room temperature.
	Or at least at a temperature where it would be feasible for them to do this.
	But they're able to look at the rhythm.
	They're able to look and to tell what genre you're listening to and a whole bunch of, even instruments that you're listening to, by looking at your brain and how your brain is responding to it.
	I haven't been able to take it down to a particular song yet, but, you know, that kind of invasion of your mind That kind of deep surveillance, I find that to be very concerning.
	And, you know, when you go down through all these different things, and you look at, okay, well, we can make everything electrical, have battery storage, and we could transmit electricity more efficiently, and maybe even have storage for the renewables.
	Everything that I look at with this stuff, I understand how they're going to use this technology to control us.
	And to make themselves more powerful.
	And that is a very concerning thing.
	Now, what do we do about this?
	You see, the problem is, it always comes back to ethics and to morality.
	And when we push God out of our society, the really smart people become dangerous.
	And the really good technology becomes a threat.
	Because we push God out of our lives.
	We'll be right back. Faster.
	So, well, anyway, let's keep going here.
	And next thing on here is let's talk a little bit about the cars.
	I said I was going to talk about cars, so let's talk a little bit about that.
	So we have, again, you know, the technology may not work.
	That's going to be our only salvation, you know.
	Maybe their technology will have issues like our disk drive is having right now.
	That may be a good or a bad thing.
	This is from a listener, MJ, and he's talking about how he's pushing back in terms of free speech against the government.
	He went out and got vanity plates that the government didn't like.
	Here's what he wanted to put on his car.
	Defy government.
	And of course he has to abbreviate that to GOV. Defy GOV. And he said, the special plates unit phoned me and left a voicemail advising me that the plate combination was unavailable.
	I called them back and I got a functionary who promised that I would get a call from a supervisor within 48 hours, but that never came.
	So then I reached out to my state representative and She was accessible and personally called me back and advised that she would investigate.
	Coincidentally, she sits on the Transportation Committee.
	Last Friday, I received a call from a lead at the Wisconsin Special Plates Unit advising me that the decision to issue this plate combination was made way above his pay grade.
	So he said a special shout-out to the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty.
	He said, they replied to my contact submission the very next day, and the staff attorney indicated that above my pay grade, quote-unquote, was code for one of the DOT's lawyers looking at the file.
	I was strangely disappointed that they came so quickly because I think Wisconsin is ripe for a good free speech precedent set in the Supreme Court.
	So he was ready to take this as far as it needed to go.
	He says, I know at first glance this is a trivial victory, but at the same time it is a stunning admission by the state of their vulnerability to our First Amendment rights if we choose to assert them.
	And he says, I've got several provocative license plate combinations.
	He sent that to me besides the Defy government.
	He also has one that says, no WHO. Another one that says no, 1984.
	And another one that says aggressive.
	So kudos to MJ for doing that.
	We have the Biden administration, however, wants to make sure that they're not going to fight you on just the license tag.
	They're going to fight you on having the car itself, of course.
	This is all about banning cars.
	And so they want to ban internal combustion engines, but we already know that they're saying, well, we're not going to have enough grid power to charge cars all the time, and we're going to have to suck power out of your car.
	Perhaps during some grid crises.
	So maybe, you know, we will use your car as a grid battery or all these cars as grid batteries.
	Now, nobody's going to have a car.
	They don't want to have private cars out there.
	It's just that they're going to do it incrementally and they're going to, you know, isolate and target and destroy one sector after the other.
	They're coming after, you know, hybrid cars as well.
	So the Biden administration wants 58 mile per gallon fuel efficiency standard by 2032.
	We're talking nine years.
	And of course, there's a long lead time on designing cars.
	And there isn't going to be, you know, the car companies see the handwriting on the wall.
	The car companies don't want to sell cars anymore.
	They want to rent cars by the ride.
	And so this is a way for them to ban cars.
	It just says they're, even at the same time, That they're banning and shutting down power supplies.
	This is the first time that's happened and the Biden administration is doing that based on emissions.
	Eric Peters replied to this and his take on it is they just outlawed trucks.
	He said no law was passed but the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration just decreed that by 2032 new vehicles must average at least 58 miles per gallon.
	No law passed.
	We have regulation without representation.
	We have banning of entire classes of vehicles, confiscation of our freedoms and our central transportation, our central liberties, done without any representation.
	There's regulation without representation and regulation without any Republicans having anything to say about it.
	But it's all going to be fixed if we get Trump in.
	So don't worry about it. We're all going to show up at the Capitol at some point in the future and we're going to shove him into office and everything will be fine.
	Because all we need is that one guy who's going to miraculously fix everything.
	Republicans are just asleep at the wheel.
	No pun intended.
	Speaking of being asleep at the wheel, remember that situation?
	I think it was in Phoenix. It was in Arizona.
	We had that self-driving Uber, and the woman was there, and they had a camera that was forward-looking, and they had a camera on her.
	She's sitting there playing with a phone or whatever, not paying any attention.
	She's bored to death. And you've got somebody who walks out of the shadows that's picked up by the forward-looking camera.
	There's a homeless person pushing a golf cart, jaywalking, walks right out in front of the car, and the car runs over her and kills her.
	And so all these people say, oh, wait a minute, you know, that, well, you can't really blame this car because it didn't see it coming.
	But they blamed the woman who could not see it coming.
	And then after that was the narrative for a day or so, you had a lot of people who came out and said, well, the problem is, is that the car, that car is not using visual, you know, spectrum.
	It's using LIDAR. To indicate, should have been able to see it even without any lights on at all.
	The lights are just there to make the person in the car feel comfortable.
	But the lights were not effective when this person was jaywalking across.
	Well, that person who was in the car as the backup safety driver has now just pled guilty to manslaughter.
	And again, that just comes across as a scapegoating to me.
	I don't think there was anything that she could have done about it.
	Even as a driver, you know, if she was driving, I don't think she would have seen that in time.
	What was interesting about it, and the reason that, you know, the Uber car didn't even slow down and ran over her, was because they had disconnected the emergency braking.
	They said it was too sensitive and it was giving all kinds of false sets, so they just disconnected the emergency braking.
	That's the way they respond to this kind of stuff.
	And of course, Uber from the very beginning said, you know, we're hiring people right now to be drivers, but the reason that you're right is so expensive is because of that other dude in the car, and we're going to get rid of that person, and it's going to be self-driving.
	Well, they put a real wrinkle in that, but they're still moving in that direction.
	And as Eric Peters says, the only car right now that comes close to this new standard of 58 miles per gallon, It's a Toyota Prius.
	And it makes 57.
	57. And of course, they don't want to have any hybrid cars.
	They are going to make sure that the hybrid cars are being purged.
	They want zero emission cars.
	So, you know, no hybrid cars.
	You go back and you look at the Chevy Prius.
	Volt, that was driven strictly by electric generators.
	But you did have a gasoline generator that was on board.
	And even though it had insanely low emissions, because that didn't have to run all the time, it would just top up the batteries.
	Even though it had insanely low emissions, many times if it was a short journey to be able to make it on the battery, you wouldn't even have to engage that.
	But it was not a zero-emission vehicle, so it can't be had.
	And to say that you're going to do this with a Prius, I mean, even a Prius that's a hybrid, 57 miles per gallon.
	And so why Eric Peters says they just banned trucks, he points out that the Ford F-150, not the electric version, but the regular one, has a curb weight of 4,465 pounds, He says, its body is made out of aluminum, but it's got a steel frame onto which the aluminum body is bolted.
	That's how trucks are laid out, because it is the best layout for the type of work that people expect trucks to be able to do without braking.
	You've got to have that steel frame there.
	A small car, like a Prius, has an integrated body and frame, unibody.
	This keeps the weight reduced.
	But even so, the Prius still weighs 3,100 pounds.
	He says it's a near miracle that something that heavy manages to almost comply with the federal regulatory apparatus decree for what's going to happen to cars.
	But it requires a hybrid drivetrain and a small car to almost get there.
	So he points out it's not going to be there.
	Biden is banning things left and right.
	It's just amazing. Every week we go.
	Biden is banning something else that we've taken for granted as some kind of tool or utility or convenience in our life.
	He's just taking everything from us, bit by bit.
	You don't think they're going to get to the point where by 2030 you own nothing, and you go nowhere, you do anything?
	It's happening right now before our eyes.
	Biden is doing this every week.
	What are the Republicans doing?
	Well, Jim Jordan's going to have a hearing about Facebook censoring people.
	Seriously. Seriously.
	Something that we've known about.
	For a decade. And he's going to have hearings about that.
	Not going to do anything about this stuff.
	He will do nothing about it.
	He'll do nothing about it.
	Just like the rest of these useless Republicans out there.
	They want you caught up in this stuff.
	Trump will do nothing about any of this stuff.
	He's not even talking about it either.
	He's talking about himself.
	The man is incapable of acting except out of his own perceived interests or out of revenge, as his lawyer Ty Kopp pointed out.
	The battery operated version of the F-150, the F-150 Lightning, has a supposed 68 electronic miles per gallon rating, but it can only travel 240 miles on a full tank, a fully charged battery in other words.
	And so for it to be that efficient, it would have to carry three times as much, you know, whereas the F-150 says it can travel more than 600 miles.
	So in order for the Lightning to be that efficient in terms of your range and your ability to do stuff, and of course, this is just talking about driving it.
	You know, we've all talked about what happens to the battery charges on these things when you put them under load.
	They just watch it grow straight down.
	He said it would need to carry three times as much electricity As its current 1,800-pound battery pack can store, the battery pack weighs almost as much as my entire car.
	It's amazing. That would increase the curb weight of this already 3.5-ton truck to more than 7,000 pounds, which would not be very efficient.
	And, of course, it isn't.
	And they don't really care about this.
	When you look at overall efficiency, they don't really care to do that.
	One of the interesting takes I saw from this, from the Daily Caller, which I thought was exactly wrong.
	The Biden administration seeks to raise the price of vehicles to force more people to drive EVs.
	That was their take on all this stuff.
	I was like, no.
	As a matter of fact, if they keep raising the price of everything, we've already gotten to the point where people can't afford it.
	The purpose is to ban all cars.
	The purpose is to make them unaffordable, to make them unchargeable by shutting down the grid, or to just outright ban them since we've already got an infrastructure that works really well.
	You just can't use it.
	We're going to just ban that.
	The purpose is not to force people to buy EVs.
	The purpose is to make sure that nobody has a car.
	Daily Caller still does not get it.
	It's amazing to me.
	Got a lot of people out there who are now talking about the MacGuffin, the climate MacGuffin.
	They said, hey, look, it looks just like the pandemic MacGuffin.
	Well, of course, the pandemic MacGuffin looked like the climate MacGuffin before it.
	So now you've gone, reverted back to a type.
	Elon Musk, meanwhile, is looking to get a $100 million subsidy from government.
	For charging stations.
	The king of crony capitalism.
	Once again, you're another one of these billionaires that conservatives put their hope in.
	According to emails reviewed by Bloomberg, Tesla is asking the government for $97 million to build nine electric charging stations for its forthcoming electric semi-trucks.
	They're currently still in pilot stage.
	And so, you know, we want to move everything to trucks and we want to have self-driving trucks.
	Now, what could possibly go wrong with something that doesn't have a driver behind the wheel?
	We just talked about what happened to the Uber taxi.
	Well, now do that with something that weighs 80,000 pounds.
	And it's traveling at highway speeds.
	Last year, the California governor, Grabbin Nuisance, boasted that the Golden State had subsidized Tesla's success.
	And when the San Francisco Chronicle investigated the claim, it found that it had to the tune of $3.2 billion.
	Yeah, we're going to brag about that.
	And of course, Tesla is getting subsidies in Texas.
	Musk is getting subsidies for all these different businesses that he's moving to Texas now.
	California bragged about giving him money.
	SpaceX has now gotten $15.3 billion in government contracts.
	See, this is why you can't count on Elon Musk to stand in the gap to protect our free speech.
	Because he's making too much money from this stuff.
	And that has been his business model, doing what the governments want.
	And not just the American government, bowing to the European government, bowing to China, all the rest of these things.
	I remember the first time we talked, Eric Peters and I, we were talking about Elon Musk being the king of crony capitalism.
	At that point in time, the LA Times had also done an article about it, but...
	Eric Peters did a better job than the LA Times.
	And he was at about $5 billion subsidy.
	Now just one of his companies is up to $15 billion.
	Just SpaceX alone with that.
	Should we try another one of these?
	You want to hit one or see if it works?
	Music Let's
	talk a little bit about someplace that you can go while you've still got a car.
	And we're going to get back to what we talked about earlier in terms of the problems, fundamental problems with our society and what it takes to fix it.
	But I saw this. I thought it was interesting.
	A couple of different publications had this.
	The Ark Encounter.
	Have you ever heard that in Kentucky?
	It's something put up by Answers in Genesis.
	And it is a...
	Full-scale reproduction of Noah's Ark in a museum about feasibility studies with it.
	But it's very interesting because it's also about the flood, about the Genesis account and all the rest of that stuff.
	It's a really fascinating thing to see.
	My family has been to it.
	And, of course, there are certain things that are said about it in Genesis and other things that are left open to interpretation.
	And so when you look at the picture of their Noah's Ark, it's not the typical nursery version of a boat with a giraffe's and elephant's head sticking out of a thing in the center of it.
	It looks like something that could weather the storm.
	But it is a life-sized replica.
	So it's kind of interesting to see how big this thing is.
	It's made out of wood. They had Amish people who were expert woodworkers who went there to build it.
	And done by an organization, Answers in Genesis, and of course they had a creation museum.
	And we know that really well.
	We had some tangential involvement with them when they were building that.
	You actually see our name on a plaque there at the Creation Museum if you ever go there.
	And I loved that because...
	It was, they did not do it in a straw man argument.
	You know, they put up the interpretation.
	They said, here's the physical evidence, and here's how it is interpreted by the evolutionists, and here's how people who believe the Bible and believe the Genesis account, here's how they interpret it.
	And they did that with a lot of different things.
	Geology, biology, cosmology, all these different things.
	It's very interesting, very thought-provocative, and always good to have a debate over things.
	And I like their approach.
	We don't have to run from this, because we've got the truth.
	I think, what was it, Augustine, who said, truth doesn't need to be defended, it needs to be let loose like a lion.
	And so... I would highly recommend that to anybody, either one of those museums.
	But I especially liked the newer one, which is the Ark Museum.
	It truly is amazing what they have done there.
	They are, USA Today had them in the top 20, both of them, in the top 20 religious museums in the United States.
	And that one is supposedly, the Ark is the top one.
	I don't know if you've ever heard of a pastor.
	His name is Vadi Bakum.
	He spends some time in Africa, but he's also located out of Houston.
	And he's done a couple of books.
	He did a book back in 2004 called The Ever-Loving Truth, Can Faith Survive in a Post-Christian Culture?
	And he said, you know, we look at this, we look at secular humanism, and we look at the fact that we're going into post-modernism, where truth is, you know, we don't believe that there is any such thing as truth.
	He says, can we survive in that kind of an environment?
	Well, he's doing an update to that book now, 20 years later.
	And so he had an interview with a Christian magazine.
	He said, well, really, at the end of the day, it's really the same thing that we're facing today, even though it's manifested itself in different ways.
	It's really moved from secular humanism to a radical Marxist approach.
	He said, it's still, it's the idea that either there is no truth or that truth is a social construct.
	And if you start going down that Marxist issue of a social construct, Then everything becomes a social construct, right?
	Your physical body becomes a social construct.
	So we don't really talk about what is a woman anymore because there is no objective truth.
	It isn't, you know, sex is no longer biological, binary, and objectively determined.
	No, there is no truth there.
	He says, so, you know, see that truth becomes a social construct.
	Knowledge even becomes a social construct.
	It's a way for them to divorce us from all reality.
	It's the ultimate deception, really.
	He said, in both instances, Christianity, and really anybody who proclaims that there is any such thing as absolute truth, becomes the enemy of the ideology of the day.
	He said, it's not just about our religious beliefs, but it's also about, well, wait a minute.
	What about what you're saying about the pandemic?
	Or what are you saying about the masks or the lockdowns or the social?
	Oh, no, you can't talk about that.
	We're not going to have that debate.
	We are going to just go with the authority figures that are out there.
	Because they are science.
	And I think it's better for us to refer to this stuff instead of as post-modernism.
	I'd call it post-objectivity.
	And if you challenge their post-objectivity, you know, they're completely subjective constructs about everything.
	If you challenge their post-objectivity, they get really PO'd with you.
	So I think it's a perfect way to describe this stuff.
	In the early church, there was this pressure, he said, to conform to the religious ideologies of the day.
	They would say in Rome, oh, okay, well, it's okay for you to practice your Christianity, but it just can't be allowed to interfere with our Roman religion.
	All gods were accepted, and Caesar was accepted, and you had to make offerings to Caesar under certain places.
	He's the guy who's the god that you make an offering to, and the Christians just refused to throw that little bit of incense on there, and for that, they would get executed because they can't tolerate you opting out of their system, and that's what we're seeing now.
	It's not just a Marxism.
	It's an authoritarian, italitarian system.
	He said today we see the same things that people say, listen, I don't have a problem with Christianity per se, so long as Christianity stays within the four walls of the church, doesn't try to impose itself on the broader culture, as long as Christianity doesn't prevent you from bowing to the idols of the day.
	But the minute your Christianity causes you to oppose same-sex marriage or causes you to oppose abortion or causes you to oppose so-called gender-affirming care and so on and so forth, those things that are really the idols of the culture today, When your Christianity steps into that realm, then that's the minute that you experience the various forms of opposition and potentially persecution.
	And we saw this with the jab, people who had a religious objection to the jab.
	Oh, well, you know, you can do whatever you want, but you can't opt out of this.
	You cannot oppose what we're putting out there.
	Only certain versions of Christianity, he said, are acceptable.
	The kind of watered-down gospel, the food bank...
	Or the liberal, political, activist kind of Christianity.
	These things have always been okay, as he points out, because they remove the offense of the gospel.
	Once that's taken out, then we are outside.
	Once you start talking about that, they put us outside of the camp, he said.
	And so with a cultural shift away from Christianity, he said Christians are now unsure how to respond to and navigate in a world where their assumptions are no longer dominant.
	But instead are perceived as detestable.
	We don't know how to respond.
	We don't really know what to do.
	We don't know how to play the game when it's not in our stadium.
	We have no idea how to approach people and a culture when our assumptions are no longer the dominant one but are perceived as vile and detestable.
	We have a tendency to recoil and to be caught off guard.
	And so he said part of the problem is That our churches have not been gospel-centered.
	He said we would get together because people are demographically the same or racially the same or because we all like the same kind of music or whatever.
	I think you still see that. You have some of the bigger churches, and they'll have different services in the morning.
	You know, this one is a traditional music, and this one is contemporary Christian music and other stuff like that.
	But do these songs actually really connect to anything of any substance, or is it just a talent show or something, right?
	That's the key that you need to look at.
	So he said, we had those things as a foundation.
	Instead of having the gospel as our foundation, And he said we have to understand about the kind of biases that are present in academia today.
	An environment that he said not only promotes godless agenda, but despises the gospel.
	And again, what is the gospel? Well, the good news.
	The good news that is exclusive, by the way.
	Good news that says salvation is a free gift, but it's only through Christ.
	Oh, they hate that.
	They hate that. Jesus is just one of many ways, or maybe he's not a way at all.
	They hate that. He said, not only does the academy despise the gospel, we're talking about academia.
	These are the people that sell you the scientism.
	Well, you believe Fauci because he's with this institution that is very prestigious.
	Or you believe this guy over here because he's from Harvard or whatever.
	And so we have competing credentials out there.
	Things that were handed out by the Wizard of Oz at the end of the movie.
	You know, by the power invested in me, I now pronounce you as Mr.
	Science, and everything that you say will be true.
	And anybody who opposes you will be anti-science.
	He says, for example, if you're a person who believes that there is a God who created the world, he said, forget about the young earth stuff, even.
	You know, the answers in Genesis stuff.
	Just a person who believes that God created the world, you don't deserve to breathe, let alone call yourself an academic.
	The academy not only despises the gospel, but the Christian worldview, the Christian cosmology, and Christian morality.
	I would say, you know, that it's all the institutions.
	These people have marched through all of the institutions.
	It's not just academia, but of course it's entertainment.
	It's the media, you know, the news media as well.
	It's politics. It's all this stuff.
	He said the academy, however, has now become the church of the modern age.
	The academy is where we go to find the priests of the modern age.
	You know, think about Anthony Fascist.
	The academy is where you go to in order to experience the sacraments of the modern age.
	It has now become the church of the secular, humanist, post-modern, and neo-Marxist.
	That's what we're seeing in the schools, those institutions, from kindergarten all the way through graduate school.
	And we see it everywhere.
	He said, we have to recognize that as Christians we've had a great run.
	We need to praise God for that, and we need to pray that that great run is not just completely over, but we need to recognize it for what it is.
	One of the misconceptions that we've experienced with this great run is we think that somehow we are special and remarkable.
	You know, the exceptional aspects of America.
	He says we're not. We're no more godly.
	We're no more special. We're no more remarkable than people who live in places where they're persecuted.
	Places like under the Indian Prime Minister Modi, who is overseeing the persecution and murder of Christians and Muslims and other people like that, or in Muslim countries where they persecute the Christians and the Hindus, that type of thing.
	But we're no different from people who live in areas like that.
	We've just been providentially placed in this particular setting, and we have to remove this notion that somehow we've been great and we've deserved the favor that we have experienced.
	And I would say that I think, though, that where I would differ with him somewhat on this, I would say certainly it's not anything that we've done.
	And it's not even anything that our forefathers did to deserve this.
	It's simply that the pilgrims came here to honor God, They wanted to have the religious liberty to honor God in the way that they sincerely believed.
	And when you honor God, God has promised that he will honor you.
	And not only that, but he promises that he will honor generations beyond you.
	And so we're kind of just coasting on that blessing.
	And we've coasted too long on it.
	And I think we've run out of our time.
	Because there is nothing that we have done in our generation, in our society, to honor God.
	There's a people who came here who did that type of thing.
	And God honored that sacrifice and that desire to search for him.
	He's got another book that he wrote in between these two called The Family Driven Faith.
	He said it highlights the role of parents...
	And what he had to say about this was, I think, very important.
	He said, we've got to get our kids out of the government school.
	We've got a lot of people who are going to war with the school system because of the things that we see are so outrageous.
	They said they've been outrageous for decades.
	This is only the tip of the iceberg that we're seeing.
	And as I said before, we were able to finally see some of this and finally able to get people to realize that this is really going on in their kid's classroom because of the Zoom thing.
	They would always discount it.
	Well, that's not happening in my school.
	That's not happening in my kid's classroom.
	The teacher's great. Well, they got the chance to see it.
	But he says, we need to not only be serious about disciplining our children in terms of teaching them, What God says, but also serious about disciplining our children in terms of giving them a full Christian education, bathed in a Christian worldview, so they can be prepared to face this culture as opposed to being baptized in it.
	When we lived in North Carolina, the Homeschooling Association there had a monthly or quarterly or whatever, I forget how frequently it was published, but their publication was called The Greenhouse Report.
	And that's the way you ought to view your kids.
	You put them in an environment, like a young plant, a greenhouse that is a protected environment, because you know that at some point in time, they're going to have to be out there in the harsh reality of the real world.
	But while they're young and tender, that's the point at which you try to work with them.
	Well, we've got our guest, Jason Barker, with Knights of the Storm.
	I'm anxious to talk to him about his experience.
	He's now been out of the military long enough that he can talk about what happened.
	And many of you may remember that Jason was very instrumental in helping a lot of people.
	He came up with some ideas for people to get their religious exemptions.
	Here are some of the things that I object to, and here's what you may object to.
	But he was able to...
	Able to retire from the military, not have to take an early leave.
	And I want to talk to him about that experience, what he's doing now, and some other things that are on his mind.
	Because, of course, he does a news show as well with Angry Tiger, Knights of the Storm, and they each have one themselves.
	So we're going to come back in a moment and talk to Jason.
	But there's also a tip on Rockfin from MJ. Thank you, MJ, for the story about your license plates.
	He says, electric semi-trucks...
	And heavy, over-the-road applications are a non-starter.
	Pun intended. Exactly right.
	As I said before, if they're going to have these superchargers or hyperchargers, whether it's going to be beyond the current superchargers, it's still going to be a very, very, very long time.
	And so unless you're going to have some kind of a mechanism where you can pull up and take off with another battery that's been charged, I just don't see that working.
	And we also know that as these batteries are charged, The faster you charge them, the less they have of a battery life, and the more of a fire risk they have.
	And I'm saying, you know, these battery semi-trucks, I think the first time you get one of them catches on fire and burns down all of the semis at the truck stop, and everything else is there, that's going to be the end of them.
	But, you know, they're pushing all this stuff, and it's not just the self-driving aspect of it, it's another thing.
	And they're doing some of the self-driving stuff on non-electric semis.
	It's a very dangerous, that's a real danger to everybody on the road.
	They enroll us in these tests and these experiments without our permission or knowledge.
	And so that's a separate issue.
	Elon Musk used...
	They're tied together in so many people's minds because Elon Musk used the self-driving deception to sell as...
	That was kind of the sizzle on the stake to make the EVs look very futuristic.
	And so, you know, those things are still tied together in many people's minds.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	The Common Man.
	The Common Man.
	They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com All right, welcome back and joining us now is Jason Barker.
	Jason Barker has been a real friend to this show and to us, my family, and to a lot of people.
	He came up with a letter, as I mentioned before, had several different points for people who might have religious objections to this jab.
	And I've had many people who are not in the military, but some people were in the military, other people were not even in the military.
	But again, looked at that because the issues are the same.
	And we're able to get a religious exemption from this.
	So, you know, with Biden pushing this stuff and trying to mandate this, it's amazing to me, Jason, just how many people you were able to help.
	And so I really do appreciate that.
	We put his letter up on the website as a template for people to refer to.
	But Jason is now out of the military.
	We want to talk to him about that experience.
	And again, the program that he has with Angry Tiger is called The Knights of the Storm.
	And you can find the program and schedules for that program and for their individual programs and many other like-minded programs at thenightsofthestorm.com.
	They've kind of got like a TV guide thing there that shows you all the different times like, you know, Guard Goldsmiths, Liberty Conspiracy, you know, 6 o'clock on...
	On RockFan Monday through Friday.
	So there's a lot of different programs that are there and they have put that up as kind of a community thing, a very valuable resource.
	So it's great to talk to you, Jason.
	Thank you for joining us. Oh, thank you, David.
	And first off, I want to congratulate your daughter on her wedding.
	And I also wanted to say that Karen is an angel.
	Yes, she is. I ordered another mug.
	I got my Save the World mug and I got my David Knight t-shirt on, so it's a great day.
	But she threw in a couple of t-shirts in there that I wasn't expecting.
	So I have the MacGuffin shirt.
	And I've got to say, that is by far my most favorite shirt right now that I own.
	So it's... It's an opportunity for people to tell, you know, when they see the MacGuffin, it's like, so what is that about?
	Yeah, and adding the website, because I noticed, and I think I might have told Karen about this, but I've noticed that anywhere I go now, even the older folks now are just glued to their phone.
	They don't want to have a conversation.
	You know, sometimes I'll be sitting like at the pharmacy or whatever, and I'll try to talk to somebody next to me, and it's like they don't want to talk to you.
	But having the website on the shirt, Somebody might glance up, because we've become antisocial, haven't we, after the COVID stuff?
	But it was a good idea to put the website on there, because someone might be curious, well, what's a MacGuffin, and let me go check out this website.
	Yeah, we want to start that conversation, you know, and get people, because now several people are starting to put this together.
	You had the energy industry starting to say, hey, this is looking familiar.
	We're seeing the same type of scheme being run over and over again, you know.
	So we've got to wake up to this play at some point in time and realize that they're just recycling these crises on us, and they've got the same end goal at the back end of it.
	So I'm glad you like that.
	Yeah. Talk to us now.
	You retired from the military, but we had spoken briefly before, and you said it was still at a point where you really couldn't talk openly about it, but I think you can talk about it now, right?
	Oh, absolutely, David. I'll kind of explain what that is.
	So when you get out of the military, unless you're getting kicked out, typically you have some saved up vacation time.
	Mm-hmm. And in anticipation of, you know, getting out, I went ahead and just saved all my vacation time I could, the maximum I could save.
	So even though I had my walking papers and everything, I still belonged to the military just on vacation.
	So it's kind of like you stack it up to the end so that gives you time to find a house and get moved and all that good stuff.
	So as of the first, I'm a free man.
	So I appreciate you holding on.
	I know you wanted an update, and I held off because I didn't want to get in trouble and have him yank me back in and court-martial me or something.
	Yeah, you never know. I was just looking at a couple of articles about A couple of Proud Boys.
	Zachary Ryle was one of the ones, but I remember Joe Biggs because I know Joe.
	And, you know, they have taken away their honorable discharge.
	Joe's even got two Purple Hearts.
	You know, they're going to take away all this stuff from him.
	It's just amazing how punitive they can be.
	And, of course, Biden is not getting rid of this...
	They're still trying to do things with this vaccine mandate, still trying to keep that authority in there.
	Tell us a little bit about what happened when you gave them that letter.
	How did that proceed?
	Let me back it up just a little bit, David.
	So, I want people to understand that even under, you know, your savior, Trump, This vaccine was going to be mandated because they basically said we need to have 75% that was the magic number at that day for herd immunity.
	We need 75% of y'all to step up and volunteer to take this so that it won't become mandatory.
	So what does that mean? That means it's going to become mandatory unless you take it.
	I mean, go ahead and I need 100% of you to volunteer, otherwise we make it mandatory.
	And if you look into the regulations, you know, once you were talking about the mRNA, I had never heard of it.
	So I started looking into it and found out that this is no vaccine.
	This thing is putting new software into your hardware.
	That's right. And I was concerned with, first off, with cancer because, you know, and the way it leads up to the mark of the beast with the passports and stuff.
	But on the medical side of it, I was looking at it and I said, if you take a cell in your body, And you inject something into it to make it do something other than its function, that by nature is a cancer cell.
	And if it divides and becomes two and three, now you have a tumor.
	And we're seeing that now with the turbo cancers and stuff.
	So anyway, I was looking at the medical side of it.
	Let me interject there for a second and say, you know, really, you look at this spike, you can kind of think of it as a lot of kind of a distributed tumor, right?
	Yeah. It's setting your body in a lot of different ways.
	It's this unnatural reproducing thing that persists.
	And I said that from the very beginning.
	I said, oh, look, they're going to have your body manufacture something that is going to train your immune system instead of injecting something that is...
	Been rendered supposedly harmless so your body can be exposed to it and learn what it is and your immune system can shut that down.
	Instead of that, they don't have to manufacture anything.
	They turn your body into a manufacturing facility.
	And so I said at the very beginning, I said, so how are they going to turn this off?
	You know, it's a genetic code injection.
	A GCI was the other thing I was calling it.
	And, you know, how do you ever, what's the off switch for this?
	Well, it turns out that there isn't really an off switch.
	And so this thing just keeps replicating.
	I came to those same conclusions on my own just from having a high school biology knowledge, biology and science.
	It was obvious.
	And I was looking into all the medical stuff, and when they changed the definition of what a vaccine is, I realized it was not going to win the medical battle because they define the terms.
	So I was like, well, I'm going to have to take this stupid shot.
	And then once they started talking about COVID passports and I started putting the pieces together, I said, this is like a Mark of the Beast thing.
	And plus, you know, like I put in the template.
	And by the way, for folks, I got a little bit of negative feedback on that, saying that that was kind of disingenuous to give someone else the answer to the test.
	And the intent of sending that up to you, it was for exposure because of formatting.
	Mm-hmm. And I wonder how many people got kicked out of the military or something bad, negative in their records because something was over half a tab over or wasn't formatted properly.
	And we had 72 hours.
	When they said this is mandatory, we had 72 hours.
	Mm-hmm.
	Mm-hmm.
	And I take that stuff very seriously.
	I don't understand why they could give exemptions for the length of hair based on religion, you know, all kinds of things they give exemptions on food, you know, kosher food and things like that.
	But when it comes to this, it was absolutely no way.
	But I wanted people to have that format out there specifically for the military and So they can take that and just reword it to how they wanted, but it's formatted properly.
	Yeah. As you point out, from the mandate standpoint, I remember all the pushback I was getting from people when I said, you're seriously, you're going to go to the mat?
	You're going to go to Washington, D.C. for this?
	You're going to give him all this money?
	This guy who locked you down and created this toxic poison?
	Well, you better hope that he gets elected because if Biden gets elected, he's going to mandate it.
	I said, no, he will coerce it.
	And we saw that, didn't we, Jason?
	You know, we saw, look at the Republican governor, DeWine, who was working with Ramaswamy, and, you know, DeWine put out a million-dollar lottery thing.
	But most of this stuff, other than the military where they just ordered it, most of this stuff was done with financial coercion.
	They told corporations, well, we want you to do this, and if you want to do business with the government, you're going to do this to your...
	To your employees and you're going to tell them that they've got to take it.
	It would have been, I think the difference would have been, it would have been more bribery and less blackmail, perhaps.
	You know, they would have bribed people to do it more with Trump, but it would have been coerced one way or the other by your employer because your employer is going to be bribed by the Trump administration and then they will get, they will use the blackmail on you to coerce you into doing this.
	It was always, you're right, it was always there.
	It was always going to be coerced.
	That was why the thing was there, and it was why they had to worship it, like it was going to be our salvation from this phony pandemic.
	Well, I'll tell you kind of how the stages this rolled out in, and it started out with Appealing to a soldier's sense of duty.
	You know, you've got to take this, not just for you, but for your family and the community.
	They like to use that word, community.
	And then, you know, once that wasn't working, because people weren't taking it.
	And I know, you know, I wanted to talk about this today, that the vast majority of people I know did not want to take this so-called vaccine.
	And they were forced to.
	You know, they waited to the last possible minute And then they went and just got it over with.
	But yeah, they started off with appealing to sense of duty.
	And my brother, unfortunately, because of that, was one of the first ones to take, I believe, the Pfizer.
	And fortunately, I don't know of any effects on him yet, so that's good to hear.
	But then they started with, once they locked us down and sent us home, they started with the carrots.
	You know, oh, well, you can go to a restaurant now, or you don't have to wear a mask.
	So it was kind of a carrot for those who complied, and it was a stick for those who were holding off.
	Because now we have to sit here, I'm the only one in the office that I have to wear a mask.
	And I talked last time about how my leadership was very supportive, and not all of them were.
	I had one person literally had it out for me.
	It was one of my direct officers above me, and they had it out for me.
	They tried to get non-judicial punishment put on me because someone ran past me out in the PT field, and I was within that six-foot distance, like the guy past me, you know?
	I'm not running three and a half miles with a mask on my face.
	This is like the games we played in elementary school with cooties and all the rest of this stuff.
	I mean, it's just so ridiculous, and yet they take it very seriously, and they will really destroy your life if they get half a chance.
	You know, it was very calculating, too, and I remember in August of 2020, or maybe it was July, we had the Yale study.
	It was up on the NIH website.
	And they were talking, they had about a dozen different ways, arguments that they would use with people.
	You talk about the sense of duty.
	They would put the burden on you.
	Well, this is something you got to do for your community.
	And how would you feel if somebody got sick and it was because you didn't get the vaccine?
	As if, you know, again, it's this whole thing that they've always sold the vaccines with about your vaccine doesn't protect you.
	Somebody else's vaccine protects you.
	But they did a lot of these different things and they put these arguments out there.
	And I saw these arguments.
	Being fed back through a guy's name is Curtis Yang, if I remember correctly.
	He was actually funded with a lot of money from the Ad Council to set up a website.
	He had studied theology at Yale, not Yale, at Duke University.
	And so he was bringing pastors in.
	He had people like Robert Jeffries, who was a big Trump supporter.
	And the two of them did a video.
	But he did videos about, here's how you're going to put this on the people in your church and tell them that this is their duty to get this to love other people.
	It was really insidious, the things that were being done.
	Yeah, same tactic with this is loving your neighbor.
	Same thing.
	It's almost like it was, I don't know, worked out in some kind of a tabletop exercise.
	Lessons learned from an event 201 or something.
	What's the latest one? That's another thing.
	This is coming again. Oh yeah.
	Fauci even said it.
	He said that, prepare for the next one.
	Then they just had this, what, called catastrophic contagion, another one.
	So it's like the Event 201, but the next one.
	It is coming again.
	They're talking about an annual booster now.
	I just don't see this going away.
	No, you still got 100 universities where they're required as a condition to go to that university.
	That's still being required with them.
	And I think the only reason we're seeing a pause here at this moment It's because they're trying to lay more of a legal foundation so they can run a lot of this stuff or all of it through the WHO. That's why I think they put a pause on it.
	They haven't taken anything off that they stole from us.
	Any of the usurped powers that they've done at the state or the local level or even at the federal level, they haven't taken any of that back.
	Instead, they're keeping all of that And they're laying a global foundation to lock us down with the World Health Organization.
	And so, yeah, you're right.
	It's going to come back. And so we need to think about this.
	And the thing that really concerns me as well is, you know, this whole MacGuffin thing.
	When they do it with the climate thing...
	It'll never come off because there isn't going to be any pill that you can take or vaccine.
	It's just going to be the only thing that you can do to assuage their desires with a climate lockdown is to just surrender everything to them and to go into some kind of a pre-industrial revolution society where you own nothing and you're this poor slave of theirs.
	Well, on top of handing our power, our sovereignty over to the WHO or other unelected organizations out there, we're also shooting ourselves in the foot with the military.
	I wanted to talk a little bit about the atmosphere and the strength of the military.
	We are down. We were down on numbers.
	They had an incentive right before I got out.
	So I was working with the National Guard.
	That was my last gig in the Army, was we observe their training, we prepare them, so that when they deploy, their skills are up to par.
	So I got to work with all kinds of different MOSs, different jobs, and they had the same problems we did.
	They had problems meeting numbers and stuff like that, because I think a lot of it has to do with the COVID shots.
	I specifically asked my units, you know, hey, what's the deal with the COVID? They're like, well, it's only mandatory if we deploy.
	And they were rotating people in and out.
	They're like, oh, and the numbers were so bad, they couldn't just send one unit.
	You've got to pull from other units to get enough numbers to go meet that mission.
	And then once the, the, once they go title 10, which they belong to the federal government for the duration of that deployment.
	And that's when they would have to get the shot.
	So, you know, this was supposedly all done in the name of readiness, right?
	Mm-hmm.
	And I wanted to talk about that because they did this on the guise of readiness.
	You have to have your shot so you can be ready, ready, ready, and they always hammer readiness.
	Yet you're going to let somebody come into the military that's going to be non-deployable for the first, I don't know, four or five years of their enlistment.
	Yeah, that's right.
	And they're going to be, because they're going to be post-surgery, pre-surgery, you know, and I had this, I made this argument when I was going through my equal opportunity course.
	They were toying around with the idea, and I don't know if they ever implemented it, but they said, because of people that like to malinger in the military, you know, every time a deployment comes up, they have a psychological problem, they become non-deployable, and they just want the paycheck, right?
	There are some people like that.
	Vast majority in the military are not like that.
	They're good people.
	But there are people like that out there.
	The Corporal Clingers.
	The Corporal Clingers from Nash, right?
	Yes, the Clingers. And now they're recruiting the Clingers.
	You know, it's like, if you'll come in and be a Clinger, we'll let you not go to Korea or wherever we're going to deploy you.
	You can be a Clinger forever and you can cling here at home.
	That's a good name for it, a clinger.
	But yeah, this idea, they toyed around with this idea that if you accumulated, I want to say it was like one year of non-deployable time over the course of like a couple years, they were going to kick you out because your job is to be ready.
	And I made the argument, I said, well, how does that affect, you know, as an equal opportunity person, I said, how does that affect females that get pregnant?
	Because as soon as you're pregnant, you can't deploy.
	You have your postpartum, your leave postpartum, you can't deploy.
	And if a woman were to get pregnant, and I'll stress a woman were to get pregnant because men can't get pregnant, I can say that now.
	They're working on that.
	You accumulate, what, almost a year's worth of non-deployable time with one pregnancy.
	Yeah. And then if you get pregnant again, what are you going to kick them out?
	So I made the argument against that policy, but they were talking about doing it.
	And why would you try to put that policy in place, but then turn around and invite people in that are going to be non-deployable?
	It shows what the real agenda is, isn't it?
	It isn't about fighting a war.
	It's not about readiness.
	It's not about any of this stuff.
	They're using this as an instrument of social change.
	They're using this as a war instrument against our society.
	Well, and in the meantime, the, you know, patriots like myself, I still consider myself a patriot, you know, they're going to get rid of us through attrition.
	You know, they either kick us out because we didn't take the jab because we stood on religious principle, or they're going to, okay, they didn't kick me out, but I was put on a no travel order.
	And even once I was lifted, I couldn't convince my command that I was able to travel.
	They had to send a separate message down from DA saying no, because I guess all the units were doing that.
	Still trying to punish you, even though they're not allowed to punish you anymore.
	And to me, that's just the leadership trying to play on the safe side.
	So our leadership, maybe not down at the ground level, I think they're still pretty okay.
	They don't want to go against the grain.
	But our upper leadership is just toxic.
	Absolutely toxic. Yeah.
	Yeah. And I tried compromising with them.
	I said, well, my units aren't that far away.
	They did work with me. We reorganized the units so the ones that I was in charge of, they were within a driving distance.
	Overnight stay wouldn't be considered travel.
	I could drive out there, do my stuff during the day, drive back, and then go out the next day.
	And I was willing to do that, but they still wouldn't let me do it.
	Wow.
	But, yeah, so I would end up eventually being gotten rid of through attrition because, you know, you get a couple of bad evaluation reports.
	That you don't compare as well as your peers.
	And then they can do what's called a QMP. It's like a quality management program or something where they can say, hey, you're just not cutting the mustard anymore.
	I know you've got two years left on your contract, but we need you out now.
	So that's the reality of it.
	The military is hurting really bad.
	They had incentives for people to go out and help recruiters.
	And I'm like, wow, so people with no recruiting experience, you want to send them out to a recruiter's office to help them recruit?
	Because it's so bad. Well, you know, that's what you're seeing in the commercial airline business as well.
	You've got so many people that were kicked out, and then people who stayed in and got the jab, a lot of them have health issues.
	Because, again, it is really like a lottery system.
	The active ingredient varied from batch to batch, varied by a factor of 33.
	You could go from 3 to 100.
	I think it was micrograms.
	But... So some of them are like a placebo.
	Other ones, it was like an instant kill shot.
	And so it's really the luck of the draw.
	It really is kind of a Russian roulette type of thing.
	And hey, we'll give you a million dollars to play Russian roulette, said the Republican governor.
	But with all the problems that they have with the pilots, they still don't want, they're still fighting, letting these people that got kicked out over the vaccine thing, now that it's no longer a requirement, they're still fighting letting them back in.
	They don't want them to be let back in.
	This is real bull-nosed about all this stuff.
	And as you point out, we see all these different things.
	We know that it's coming back because they're not yielding on anything.
	They're not apologizing for anything.
	They're not fixing or repealing anything that they've done.
	They're laying the foundation to go even further the next time.
	And that's what's really key about this.
	You know, I interviewed a couple of weeks ago a Navy SEAL from Poland, Drago.
	And he was a guy who really loves this country, really hates communism because he lived under communism.
	And, and so, you know, he joined the military to serve his country for patriotic reasons.
	And I think he was a SEAL for about 10 years and he taught other SEALs for about 10 years.
	And when I finished the interview with him, because we talked about his history, growing up in a communist country and that type of thing, and about coming to America.
	But when we got finished with the interview, Jason, he said, I want to come back and talk about what's going on in the military, the readiness stuff that you're talking about here, because it's a big issue for anybody.
	If you like this country, you like the military, whatever, these people are destroying everything.
	They truly are. Well, and the thing is with the readiness.
	So, you know, as an EO guy, I don't want to discriminate against anybody, right?
	I don't. And I always advocated for folks.
	But the thing is, you can't have it both ways.
	You can't say in the sake of readiness, you can't bring in people and you're like incentivizing people to come in that are going to take away from readiness.
	Yeah. That's the problem.
	I don't hate on anybody or anything like that.
	It just shows me, looking at that, that the whole readiness argument for the jab was BS. It was all BS. I don't know why they wanted us to take this shot so bad.
	But I just know the military is really hurting right now.
	We're hurting on ammunition because of the Ukraine war.
	We're hurting on fuel because of our strategic pile of it.
	I don't know what would happen, David, if we went to war right now, like really went into a hot war.
	We've got Russia, China...
	In North Korea, all talking now, hanging out.
	You know, these are real MacGuffins that we really have to worry about, whether that's fabricated as a global conspiracy or not.
	I don't know. But people are really going to be dying when bullets start flying.
	It really is amazing when you look at Biden as provocative and as aggressive as they are in terms of trying to challenge Biden.
	Not third world countries or something like that.
	But were you going to have a proxy war with Russia or China?
	They want the real thing directly with Russia, directly with China.
	And so they keep pushing for that.
	At the same time, they keep starving the military of resources, including personnel and everything.
	It really is insidious what is happening with it.
	And it is very alarming, but it is what it is.
	Well, it's only going to get... It's only going to get worse.
	I personally know at least three or four people that are, you know, their 20 plus year was their intent.
	And they're already saying, as soon as this enlistment's up or as soon as I can put my retirement paperwork in, I'm doing it.
	I'm getting out of here. So we haven't even started.
	If they can't fill those numbers.
	And then the really bad part about that is these are upper ranking folks.
	So even if we do get the numbers in to fill the lower ranks, They're going to retire and then people are going to start getting pushed up so fast.
	You have very inexperienced leadership.
	And that's another problem that's going on with the military I disagreed with is they have like a move up or move out policy they try to enforce.
	That if you don't make a rank by a certain time, they're just going to get rid of you.
	And I've always said, what's wrong?
	I understand I don't want to have a soldier that hangs out as an E4 for 20 years because he's kind of malingering.
	He's not really taking his knowledge and passing it on.
	on making rank now and all you're doing is you're you're putting somebody in that's inexperienced they haven't even mastered their e5 rank before they're in e6 and they haven't even mastered that before they're in e7 and now they're in charge of a whole platoon full of people so i that's kind of been a problem that's been in the making for like 10 years or so wow wow yeah there's a lot of a lot of systemic problems there i
	I remember years ago talking to Joel Skousen, and he's always been of the mindset that the elitists in Washington want to invite a first strike.
	They believe that they can survive that and then move out.
	But he said, you know...
	This is really a blessing for a lot of the people who are getting kicked out of the military because they're weakening the military to such a non-combat-ready status.
	Be glad that you're not in it.
	It's going to be ultimately a blessing, I think.
	And we're going to need to have people who understand some of the things about defending this country, perhaps in the future.
	Who knows what kind of unrest and chaos they want to provide.
	It is truly amazing, isn't it, Jason?
	I mean, do you ever think that you would see a situation where you just have...
	I saw a video just yesterday of a guy who goes in, and he's got a big trash can, and he goes into a convenience store, and he just starts pulling stuff off the shelf.
	And there's a guy who's videotaping it, and he's telling the store owners, you better leave him alone.
	Just leave him alone. Wait for the police to come, but you can't.
	Don't leave him alone.
	He's going to, and, uh, they just had as much of it as they could take.
	And one of the store owners got a, like a two by four and started beating the guy with it, you know, jumped him and the other one's beating him with a two by four.
	Uh, but you know, that kind of a situation or the situation where the woman, uh, you know, tried to stop these people were stealing a couple of thousand dollars from Lowe's and, uh, you know, they beat her up and then she got fired by Lowe's.
	Do you ever think you would see that kind of deliberate chaos?
	To me, that's what they're doing at all the institutions in house.
	It's not just that the Marxists have marched through the institutions, taken over the schools and universities with CRT stuff, but it's actual chaos that we're now seeing coming to us at a retail level.
	That's why, you know, we look at this and who knows what is going to be happening in the near future, but we need to start getting together, preparing ourselves, having a community of people who are going to be able to help each other in mutual defense, I think.
	Oh, absolutely. And if you look at what's going on here, it's not just here.
	It's across all Western nations, and we've talked about this a lot.
	But if you look into history, when we want to see regime change, whether it be Cuba or wherever, I had a laundry list in the show we did, I think, last week.
	But we always do a destabilization effort first.
	Yes. Both with their money and their philosophy, you know, and we try to Uprise them and get them to tear themselves apart.
	That's something that's being done right now to the Western world.
	That's right. And sanctions. These sanctions that we supposedly had against Russia, they were really directed more at Europe, even more so than the United States.
	but it harmed us more than it did, or certainly as much, but I think more so than it harmed Russia, because it started pushing Russia in a direction of being independent of this system.
	They were still able to, they made massive amounts of money with oil because they were still able to sell it, and the price of oil went skyrocketed because of our sanctions.
	But the people who got the short end of the stick were the people, especially in Europe, but everywhere, where they were consuming the oil, And so sanctions are always the first act of war.
	And I've said it many times that these sanctions are, you know, we have been sanctioned.
	We started getting sanctioned with all the measures that were being taken under Trump.
	And then it's continued through with Biden and even the supposed sanctions against Russia are really more sanctions against us.
	It is an act of war. It is like a siege.
	Yep, it's a precursor to it, absolutely, to a hot war.
	And if you look, you can tell that this isn't just something that's organically happening, that's just happening on its own, because it's happening in every Western nation.
	That's right. And I can't wait to get Harps on to talk about this interesting stuff in Australia.
	You notice you don't see anything about Australia in the news anymore?
	That's right. Yeah. It's because they stood up enough and the government backed down, but they don't want you to see that, see?
	Yeah. So they won't televise that.
	That's right. But if you look at who they choose to prosecute, look at the Summer of Love, all those riots, how many people died, got injured.
	those people aren't prosecuted yet the january 6 people um where a lot of them had good intentions they're still sitting in a jail cell maybe some of them don't even have charges put on them no no speedy trial no due process no nothing can't even talk to their lawyers some of them so look at who they're choosing to prosecute and who they're choosing not to prosecute and try to tell me that's not by design look at who who's funded these prosecutors a person sorrows who grew up destabilizing currencies across small nations he's just stepped it up a little bit
	yeah so the united states is in their sights because if they could take down the united states they pretty much can take the world that's right yeah and of course Yeah. The latest Bond films is obvious reference, I think, to him.
	But yeah, it is truly amazing to see what is happening with all this stuff.
	And it doesn't show any signs of getting better.
	As a matter of fact, they're just doubling down.
	And it's across all...
	There's no conspiracy to see here, Jason.
	It's just that they're all happening to do the same thing at the same time.
	And we saw this all the way through 2020 and 2021.
	Yeah, and it's not like they just don't come out, you know, during their meetings and publicly say it, you know, as well.
	It's not like they don't do that, right?
	I know. Yeah.
	There was actually a video that somebody sent me, and it was talking about OneHelp.
	And... The WHO, and so it was, I think it was CBN was the news organization that had it there.
	So I had somebody who was on, she's talking about, well, you know, they're trying to set up a world government, you know, these types of things, and so they're moving these powers and these decisions here.
	And so YouTube puts up a disclaimer there from Wikipedia, saying there is no such thing as a new world order, and they're not trying to set up a totalitarian world government, and all that.
	It's just comment after comment after comment.
	It's like, well, then why do they say it out loud?
	You know? Why do they give us their plans and you tell us that they're not doing this even though we've seen them?
	It's just ridiculous. Nobody's buying that anymore.
	But, you know, you see this with totalitarian governments.
	Nobody believed What the Russian, the Stalinist media was telling them at the time.
	They were all cynical about it.
	They said there's no news in Asvestia, there's no truth in Pravda, and, you know, that's what they called them.
	And so nobody believes the Ministry of Truth here anymore in the U.S. They've lost all their credibility, but they just continue to go down that path.
	Another hallmark of totalitarianism, isn't it?
	Oh yeah, and it's going to get worse.
	I wanted to talk a little bit about housing stuff.
	I recently sold my house and I've been watching the markets pretty much for 10 years since my wife and I started to crawl out of debt and save up money to get our first house and stuff.
	What I'm seeing right now is kind of scary and it kind of ties into the whole CBDC and Mark of the Beast stuff and the whole you'll own nothing and be happy, you'll be a renter.
	So I was looking it up and the housing, so during the lockdown, a couple things happened.
	So COVID ties into it as well.
	A couple things happened.
	So people's incomes kind of went down, a lot of people.
	The cost of manufacturing a home went up significantly.
	So the cost of homes went up and that's because of supply chain disruptions and stuff like that.
	And then you also had a lot of people at home, kind of weird.
	A lot of people at home were engaged in small projects.
	So you go to Lowe's, you couldn't find any 2x4s and stuff like that.
	So there was a big demand for product and none coming in.
	So the price went up exponentially.
	As a matter of fact, my wife's cousin, she had built about 10-12 years ago, she had built a cabin.
	That she had sold.
	And I forget what she said, $80,000, $85,000 something that cost her to build it.
	It was a house, but it was kind of a cabin-style house, you know?
	So she recently bought a property and went to build the same exact home because she still had the blueprints on it.
	It was three times the cost.
	So they ended up getting a manufactured home and throw on there.
	That's all they could afford. So, you know, this is kind of like, you know, it caused the COVID caused the price of all this to go up.
	And then people were going ahead and getting it anyway because, you know, the interest rates were really, really good.
	So they're getting into these and they're fitting it within their budget.
	So what happens at that point is all of a sudden, it doesn't fit into your budget because the food costs have gone up.
	Fuel costs have gone up.
	Maybe someone didn't get their job back.
	So now BlackRock and Vanguard are coming in and they're snatching up all these homes at pennies on the dollar.
	And it's interesting, I looked up what kind of homes they're buying.
	They're buying mostly medium to small homes that were built in the 70s, single families, and they're flipping them into rentals.
	So all those affordable first-time homebuyers have nothing on the market, nothing on the market whatsoever, unless you can step into a $500,000 home as a first-time homebuyer and you're willing to pay, you know, 8%, 9% interest or whatever you can get.
	You know, that's really bad.
	And that's another part of it is the interest rates.
	You know, people can't afford making cars unaffordable, but especially houses unaffordable as they jack up the interest rates.
	And As things come down the pike, as you start to have the loss of the U.S. dollar as a reserve currency, and as the chickens come home to roost on all this money that we have borrowed, but now, you know, higher interest rates, you know, they're going to sacrifice the economy to try to preserve their financial value.
	Hegemony. And so it's going to get really rough for people.
	And that's really going to be the thing that's going to drive everybody into a rental market.
	It's very difficult for first-time homeowners to be able to get in.
	And of course, you don't hear anything from Biden about helping people with first-time homeownership.
	I haven't heard any of the Republican candidates talking about it either.
	Have you? No, no.
	And BlackRock and Vanguard are their buddies.
	Yeah. Making money.
	And it's actually theft. It's theft of equity because, you know, people during the lockdown, I know people that were floating a lot of stuff on their credit cards because, you know, maybe they lost one income.
	Maybe their spouse couldn't work or whatever.
	Maybe they had to stay home more with their kids, so they had to cut their hours if they did keep their job because, you know, maybe they were essential.
	But, yeah, so they wound up with this massive credit card debt.
	And, you know, maybe they could afford their home still, and they're in it like a 3%, 3.5% interest rate or whatever.
	Well, all of a sudden, you've got maybe credit cards 17, 18, 19% interest or more, and you got all this debt.
	So now they come at you with, hey, let's do a debt consolidation loan.
	Let's redo your house, put a new mortgage on your house.
	And then, okay, well, now I got a choice.
	I remortgaged my house at like a 6% or 7% interest rate or whatever I can get because interest rates went up.
	But that's better than paying my 19% on my credit cards so I can go ahead and pay those credit cards off.
	So, okay, we can squeeze this into our budget.
	Yeah, our mortgage is going to be a little bit more.
	Now we've got basically another 10 years tacked onto our mortgage.
	You're kind of going from square one again, which is beneficial to the banks because on the front end of your mortgage, they're getting more interest than what goes to principal.
	So they don't want you on the tail end of that mortgage.
	They make more money on the front end.
	But then, all of a sudden, my food cost goes up.
	Inflation. You've got shrinkflation.
	You've got fuel costs. You've got everything going up.
	All of a sudden, I have to choose.
	Do I make my mortgage payment or feed my children?
	And this is how they're going to usher in what I believe is going to be the mark of the beast.
	Once this stuff goes to CBDC, then you're going to have to choose.
	Again, in the same aspect that you have to choose, am I going to make my mortgage payment or feed my children?
	You're going to have to choose, do I take this mark, this biometric slash chip or whatever it winds up being because we've gone cashless?
	Do I take this mark?
	And feed my children or not take the mark.
	That's how they're going to get us with it.
	And we know that because we look at the way that they push this through, you know, WorldCoin is focused right now on the poor countries.
	And we saw this happening in India with Bill Gates and the Aadhaar system.
	They would go first to the poor people and say, well, we'll give you payments of something or we'll give you welfare or we'll give you access to medical care, but only if you take this card, only if you take this number, this identity, that type of thing.
	So they use it to blackmail people who are in financial straits, and so they want to put us in financial straits because that's the way that they can run this scam on us.
	And you're talking about Jason credit cards.
	I've said, and I haven't talked about this for a while, But I said before these other issues became the focus, the lockdown and the vaccine and all the rest of this stuff, I said, why doesn't somebody running for office?
	If I was going to run for office today, what I would do is I'd make the center point of my campaign the usury laws, bringing them back, you know?
	Just as people say, we've got to bring back Glass-Steagall, we've got to stop them from speculating and all this stuff.
	But even more importantly, from a consumer standpoint, To say, how is it that they could borrow money at essentially 0% interest and charge it out at 20%?
	And then even make it even worse than that if they come up.
	I've seen stories about people who got into debt with a medical bill, and once they realized that you got a big medical bill, even if you haven't fallen behind in your payments, they would jack your interest rate up just to take you down.
	I mean, it's such vicious, predatory...
	Loan sharking, essentially.
	You know, the type of stuff that the mafia used to do before they had the drug stuff, you know, that they would run.
	You know, this is so criminal, and it's amazing, and it shows you how these people are owned by the banks, that nobody, Republican or Democrat, will ever talk about putting a limit on these credit card interest rates, or, you know, keeping stuff within a range.
	I remember when the interest rates got up to like 5% on homes, they said, well, they haven't been at this point Since, you know, the 1960s or whatever it was, and I went back and looked to say, well, I wonder what the interest rates, what they were paying people on savings accounts, you know?
	So when the interest rates they loan out for houses was like 5%, they were paying people 4% on a savings account.
	Now you get like a tiny fraction of 1%, typically, you know, for most of the savings accounts, especially with the big banks.
	It really is criminal what they've been able to pull off, and it just shows you the power of We're good to go.
	Well, I remember those days when it was beneficial to have both a checking and a savings account.
	Yeah. And, you know, the savings was the interest-bearing one.
	That's where you keep the majority of your money and then you just shift enough into the checking because that was the easy money to spend without having to go to the bank to draw cash.
	That's right. And that was the point of, you know, why have a checking and a savings?
	Well, that was the reason for it.
	But talking about the interest rates, you know, I found out I was reading through this BlackRock and stuff like that, looking back At the last housing crisis we had, and did you know that they get a preferential interest rate?
	So when people are getting 3% to 4% interest rate, they're getting like 1.4%, 1.5%.
	So when it comes to competing, let's say I'm trying to get one of those 1970s era small houses, and I've come up with my down payment.
	Of course, I've got to come up with 20%, right?
	Otherwise, I get stuck with PMI. And so they can actually come in and offer more money because they're getting it if they are borrowing the money and not paying cash because they're saving on that interest.
	So it's not they have an unfair advantage.
	These large companies have an unfair advantage.
	There's no Fair competition between a private buyer and these large companies.
	And I'm telling you, they're out there snatching these houses up.
	That's probably why the housing market looked really good because you got all these houses moving around and stuff like that.
	No, it was them buying. Buying up massive amounts of homes that you're going to rent.
	You're not going to own it. Some of them are turning into multifamily homes so they can maximize their profits.
	And it's just really criminal what they do.
	Why can't I get that 1.5% interest rate?
	Yeah, well, because, you know, they are the deputized state that's going to push out the ESG for the government that they want.
	It's just, the whole thing is so criminal.
	It just, it always infuriates me, the fact that the banks were basically paying no interest to the Fed to get their money.
	And then, of course, they pay no interest to the consumers who have a checking, who have a savings account.
	But boy, they get, you know, what would have always been usurious interest rates.
	I mean, the whole reason when they took off the The usury laws in the late 1970s, it was because we had that rampant inflation.
	And I remember, you know, Karen and I, you know, got our first jobs and we were both working.
	And so we got a home and we were paying 13% fixed interest on that home.
	And it was crazy.
	It was a stupid move.
	But, you know, they are...
	They're able now to, they said, well, interest rates are so high, we're going to remove the usury cap.
	You know, they prohibited them from loan sharking people and charging them more than, let's say, 10% or something.
	But they were even charging on the mortgages like 13%, and it got even worse after we got into the market.
	It still kept going up after that.
	But, you know, they took that off, but now that they don't pay anything, They still keep these astronomically high rates out there.
	It amazes me the stuff that people don't pay any attention to that affects them so directly.
	It's like the jab and they can't make the connection to Trump.
	They don't make the connection to their standard of living and what is happening to how they're being exploited by the banks and how both Republicans and Democrats are just fine with it.
	You know, they don't understand the core of so much of this misery that is out there because we all get distracted and we all start looking at the games between Trump and Pence and all the rest of this stuff.
	It's just crazy. The theater.
	Oh, yeah. And you know what's even more criminal about it, and I know this makes Angry Tigers blood boil, but They do what's called fractional banking.
	So let's just say you have $100,000 in the bank saved up.
	They're not paying you nothing, hardly anything for interest on the annual.
	Your APR is very, very, very low.
	But then they'll turn around and loan that same $100,000 out 10 times.
	Yeah. And charge these exorbitant...
	They basically made money from thin air.
	And they're charging people interest, high rates of interest, on that made-up money based off of your money that they're not paying you for.
	So that is absolutely criminal.
	It should be illegal. And, you know, we just watched a couple banks close down because they weren't solvent.
	I want people to think about this.
	Is any bank in the world solvent right now?
	Because they've got this fractional banking system.
	Oh, that's right. And then take a look at what's happening.
	You're talking about residential real estate.
	The commercial real estate, as Gerald Salenti has been pointing out for a couple of years, he said this is a giant problem coming down the pike, and it's starting to arrive now because now after a couple of years of Gerald talking about it, You've now got mainstream media talking about the commercial real estate thing based on the lockdowns and how they've restructured everything.
	You know, that is a big thing, and that's got a big exposure to a lot of corporations.
	And when that starts happening with them, that's going to definitely be something that's going to trickle down.
	They want to talk about trickle-down economics?
	Well, this is going to be trickle-down bankruptcies.
	It's going to trickle down on all of us.
	They're going to be trickling on all of us with these bankruptcies.
	Was it Kamala Harris, just within the last week, had said, which is contrary to Bidenomics working, so I don't know what Bidenomics is.
	I think it's a made-up word.
	But she made the statement, and I wouldn't doubt it because I know people in this situation.
	She said that most Americans are a $400 unexpected crisis away from bankruptcy.
	Yeah. And now think about it in this context with what Gerald talks about.
	You've got, you know, with big business and in the cities and stuff like that, commercial real estate, also comes all the small satellite businesses.
	Your mom and pop restaurants, your gas stations, things like that.
	And those are the people right there that work at those places that are $400 away from bankruptcy.
	Yes. So when they're put out, when they're put out of, and it happened during the lockdown, Foreclosures.
	Foreclosures are up, but I had a number here.
	Just from February to March this year, foreclosures went up 20%.
	And those homes are, you know, those are people that worked at those places and now they can't afford to make their mortgage payment and pay their Either feed their kids and stuff like that or keep their electricity turned on.
	The secondary and tertiary order effects of even the commercial market is going to be horrible down the road.
	Oh, yeah. Yeah, you mentioned earlier the people that might have been staying at home or had a job that had kids at home because they were essential.
	And that's the other thing that really sticks in my craw about all this stuff.
	As I've said many times, Hillary said that we were despicable.
	Trump said we were non-essential.
	I mean, it's like, what would you rather be?
	I'd rather be hated on than be told that I can't have a job and that type of thing.
	I mean, it's just the contempt that they have for us, both Republican and Democrat, is just beyond belief that they can continue to do this and that we continue to think that they're somehow the solution to this.
	And of course, the solution to this Is to try to make sure that you've got something set aside that is going to be stable, you know, because so many people, and I know certainly we're in this situation, you know, all of our money is essentially tied up in our home.
	What happens if we lose income?
	What happens if we lose the home?
	You know, you can't sell it if everybody's having that problem.
	We've already been through that.
	Just in 2008, 2007, 2008, we saw that happen.
	A lot of people got into financial issues, didn't have enough depth, but then they could not sell their home because there weren't any buyers out there that could buy it under those conditions.
	And now we're going to see this, and we saw a lot of stuff that was snatched up by these big companies, but nothing at all like what is coming.
	One other thing I would say, too, Jason, tying it back to this chaos that's been engendered by these Soros district attorneys and the non-prosecution of looting and that type of stuff, because that's really what is happening now.
	It's not even shoplifting.
	It's organized looting.
	Think about how they're preparing the urban population for this, because once everything happens and people lose everything and they lose it, of course, they're not going to have any qualms about going out and looting everything.
	I mean, it is going to be total...
	This kind of chaos that you're seeing in San Francisco and other places like that is a training exercise.
	They're trying to get people acclimated to the fact there's going to be massive looting once the economic downturn comes that everybody's expecting.
	And you're going to see, hopefully don't see it, but it's going that way, a civil war.
	Yes. You're going to have those who have saved, and like my wife and I, we don't have any debt for the most part other than our home now.
	No credit card debt, we're going to be growing our own food, and people are going to resent that, that they don't have stuff that we do.
	And so they're going to come.
	And I mean, we've seen it in St.
	Louis where the BLM folks went into the nicer, supposedly white neighborhood or whatever.
	They just don't like that you have something that they don't.
	That's right. And those people, I don't think they would feel that way if they weren't goaded into feeling that way by people like Maxine Waters and Al Sharpton.
	That's what all the CRT stuff is about and all the reparations and everything.
	It's a sense of entitlement to steal, you know, is what they're building here.
	You deserve it.
	These people don't deserve it. They're privileged and they're exploiters.
	You know, it's this kind of class warfare that we've never seen before in this country.
	We always saw class warfare in Europe, but they decided that they would inculcate class warfare here by doing it along racial lines.
	And that's why you had these Marxist revolutionaries back in the 70s like Bill Ayers said, what's going to work for us is we're going to use white skin privilege.
	And we're going to build this as a racial conflict.
	Instead of a class struggle, we'll have a race struggle in America.
	And we'll be able to set people up that way.
	I've got a couple of tips here I want to read.
	And thank you, people. On Rumble, superfaith.
	Thank you very much. That's very generous.
	I appreciate that. So you can join the show this morning with my dad in Talbot, Tennessee.
	Oh, cool. Drove this time in my 98 4Runner with 316,500 original miles.
	I doubt we'll see an electric car in 25 years of that kind of mileage.
	No, you won't. The battery would long be gone by that time.
	Thank you so much.
	On Rumble, we have BusyB777.
	So many nuances to the COVID deception.
	We must never stop discussing it because it is so easy to forget the mind-boggling amount of different ways that they attacked us.
	And again, they've not removed anything, have they?
	they're consolidating what they took and, you know, planning for the next aggressive push.
	And that's what I think is coming down the line.
	Tell us a little bit about – we've only got a couple of minutes left.
	Tell us a little bit about the programs that you've got and some of the things that you've got on the nights of the storm so that people can see, you know, the schedule that other people have.
	I know you've got the foxhole, and Angry Tiger has got his program as well.
	People can find the links at thenightsofthestorm.com.
	But you basically go out on Twitter for the most part, right?
	Or do you have another platform that you're broadcasting on now?
	So, Twitter and Rumble, for the most part.
	I think we sometimes are on Odyssey, but there's stuff I've got to do after the fact to make it stay there.
	But yeah, Twitter, it's Knights OTS, and then Rumble, Knights of the Storm.
	We're on, what time?
	It's 9? I'm sorry.
	9 to 10 Eastern.
	My time zone changed in my head, so I've got to do the math.
	But you can go to the website.
	And Tiger actually does two shows.
	Tiger does his Tiger and Snake financial report on Fridays.
	And then on Wednesday, he does the Tiger's Den.
	And again, the schedule is out on nights of the storm.
	So tomorrow, we have one of your listeners coming on, Brian Taylor.
	He's going to be talking about nanotech.
	He found some interesting articles.
	We're going to talk about nanotech.
	And then the following week, I'm very excited, Audi MRR is coming on.
	Oh, great! Yeah, and he's going to talk a little bit about the trans agenda and what they're doing to children and stuff like that.
	Oh, that's good. Yeah, I had a couple of items I didn't get to today.
	Really sad. There was a 33-year-old individual in Canada, and I forget how long it's been.
	It's been over a decade since he had bottom surgery, as they call it.
	And he is in so much pain and so much misery.
	That he wants to take his life.
	And you know, in Canada they're pushing people for euthanasia.
	But he put in his application to be killed in Canada, which they're more than happy to give that to most people.
	But because it would reflect on their trans agenda, they will not let him have that.
	It's absolutely amazing.
	And he's writing about that.
	There was another teen who went through surgery begging his peers not to do that.
	It's so insidious, isn't it?
	Who would have thought we'd see something like this?
	It's evil. It's absolutely evil.
	I mean, murdering children, you know, I think abortion is murder.
	Yes. You know, from the moment of conception, it has its own DNA, you know.
	I think you're being too harsh.
	Really? As Trump would say.
	I agree, it is murder.
	Yeah, it is demonic, yeah.
	When you look at it, it's, you know, how do you destroy, you know, the human race?
	That's always been Satan's objective.
	Well, come after the children, right?
	And conversely, you know, what is the sign of a revival and renewal of a society?
	God turning the hearts of the fathers to the children and the children to the fathers, right?
	But we're so far away from that, aren't we?
	Just exactly the opposite.
	It's great talking to you, Jason.
	Thank you. It's been wonderful to...
	I know you from a distance.
	We haven't gotten together, but all the things that you've done to help people, I really do appreciate that.
	TheNightsOfTheStorm.com is where you'll find the schedule for their program and for so many others because they really have been great at setting up a community of people whose commentary I think you can really trust.
	Thank you so much, Jason. Good luck.
	Thank you, David. Welcome to my show!
	The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲