Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 29, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:00:45

The David Knight Show - 06/29/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Transcription by CastingWords
	Transcription by CastingWords
	it's Thursday, the 29th of June, year of our Lord, 2023.
	Today we're going to begin by taking a look at the lockdown.
	Because if we don't understand how this happened, who did it, and if we don't take precautions to stop it from happening again, and that means largely recognizing who's doing it, we've got the guy who was the most egregious hypocrite about this, Matt Hancock in the UK. Going around bragging about how the next time it's going to be much stricter.
	Does he mean next time it'll apply to him?
	We need to understand what happened and move to stop this.
	But we'll also talk about the circular firing squad that Washington, D.C. has become.
	It truly has.
	I mean, it's absolutely insane, the response of both the Biden administration and Donald Trump himself.
	We'll be right back.
	And of course, there's also some horrific news about what is going on with the vaccines and people's desperate effort to get help after they've been harmed by this.
	And the blind eye that is being turned to everyone is And our government and every other government, as they all operate under the same rules.
	And who's pulling the strings on these people?
	So we're going to talk about that, but let's begin with the lockdown.
	Britain must prepare for harder lockdowns, says Matt Hancock.
	Again, this is the guy who, as his text messages were revealed, was mocking the And laughing about what he was doing to people.
	At the same time, pictures and other things have surfaced of him having, as everybody was locked down, he was having an adulterous relationship with a married woman.
	And they were violating all the rules.
	His own rules, God's rules, all the rules.
	But next time, next time, it's going to be maybe applying to The party members as well.
	And I'm not just talking about political parties.
	I'm talking about the Christmas parties and all the rest of the stuff that these elites were doing.
	These globalist elites, these elitist hypocrites doing what they prohibit everybody else from doing.
	And of course, as we're seeing this, and as we're seeing the damage to the vaccines, you've got people scrambling to point the finger at other people.
	Even the guy who was the military head of Operation Warp Speed, he's now pointing fingers.
	Oh, it was the NIH. Oh, it was the China lab.
	It was the NIH at the China lab.
	It wasn't me. I didn't do it, right?
	Everybody is looking to blame somebody else, except Donald Trump, who wants to still take credit for this.
	That's how dense and stupid this guy is.
	He's such a narcissist.
	He will destroy himself out of his own perceived self-interest and his own ego.
	But Matt Hancock is coming in a close second here.
	So, anyway, Matt Hancock should be arrested for willful misconduct in public office, says the Telegraph.
	They said he can and must be dragged before a select committee and made to answer for his actions and the vast hurt That they have called.
	And they've been running the UK's Telegraph.
	They have been running a massive expose on him for the last several days.
	For eight days now, the Telegraph has published the most breathtakingly damning stories about the misuse of power and quote-unquote science by Matt Hancock and his cabal.
	During the pandemic. That's coming from the UK Telegraph.
	This is mainstream media, even, that is pushing against this stuff.
	So why isn't this a discussion in our presidential election?
	The two frontrunners, by a large amount, are Trump, who did the lockdown and kept it, and then Biden, who doubled down on the lockdown and did mandates in addition.
	Why are they the two frontrunners?
	This is as crazy as if Matt Hancock, We're running for president, and he was beating all the competition.
	What is our problem here?
	Well, we know. The problem is the party apparatus and the mainstream media.
	A huge failure of Trump, but everybody had a part in this thing.
	About the only person who will talk about the lockdowns and talk about the vaccines is RFK Jr.
	Of course, he is banned by the mainstream media.
	That's why he's heavily censored.
	But of course, he's got other issues as well.
	But still, they don't want that talked about whatsoever.
	Painful lockdowns, says the Telegraph in yet another article.
	Painful lockdowns, a global policy failure that must never be repeated.
	That's right. Let's not forget that this is a global policy.
	Let's not forget that they were all doing the same thing.
	It didn't matter what their stated political party was or their stated political philosophy was.
	They all did the same thing.
	Isn't that the most amazing thing about this?
	Why do they push so hard against people who are quote-unquote conspiracy theorists?
	Because it was a vast global conspiracy.
	Just look at what happened in 2020.
	You've got people from Trump to Trudeau.
	To Macron, to Biden, all of them saying, well, this is what we're going to do.
	We're doing this. I told you we were going to do this, and now we're doing it.
	And now, two months from now, we're going to do the next thing.
	It's like, what? What is this incrementalism if you're talking about you have to respond to a pandemic?
	None of it made any logical sense at all.
	It was obviously a lie.
	Lockdowns taught us many painful lessons, says the UK Telegraph.
	That economies cannot be shuttered for months without consequence?
	That needless money printing will fuel inflation?
	Let's see, both of those were done by Trump.
	Shuttered the economy for months?
	The people who voted for him?
	The middle class, the mom and pop business owners?
	They were not essential.
	But, hey, let's just print a lot of money.
	Let's go. Three and a half trillion, four trillion, five trillion.
	Doesn't matter. You know, we're on our way to $50 trillion deficit here.
	Debt, I should say.
	Taught us that school closures will have a catastrophic effect on people's education.
	But perhaps the most painful lesson is that lockdowns were far less effective than many people have been led to believe.
	They were not less effective.
	They were completely ineffective.
	As one person tweeted out in response to this Matt Hancock article, she said, even at the height of World War II, government never used propaganda to frighten its own people.
	But this lot did.
	These people did. Kids killed themselves.
	Mental health collapsed. It's unforgivable.
	Matt Hancock should be arrested for willful misconduct in public office.
	And that's the headline of the Telegraph thing there.
	But just think about that.
	Even at the height of World War II, government never used propaganda to scare its own people.
	And we never had a quarantine where you quarantined healthy people.
	And we never had a pandemic where Where nobody had died yet.
	And yet Trump did that with the executive order.
	Nobody had died, but we had a pandemic.
	And we're going to quarantine healthy people.
	And we're going to scare everybody to death.
	When he did that executive order in the afternoon of Friday, I'd already done my morning show that Friday the 13th.
	On the following Monday, the 16th, I began my show with the pictures from World War II. Because everybody was being scared to death.
	And I was trying to tell them, don't let them scare you.
	That fear is how they're going to control you.
	I said, what did the British government do as the Nazis were amassing across the English Channel, ready to invade in the Battle of Britain?
	They had just swept through all of Europe.
	The British had had a severe setback, to put it mildly, at Dunkirk.
	They had basically escaped by the skin of their teeth with the help of a lot of private vessels, individuals taking out their own boats and pulling over soldiers to get them out of there, but lost a tremendous amount of equipment.
	With that dire situation, and it was a real dire situation, hey, they're going to come here and they're going to kill us, they're going to drop bombs on us, missiles on us, the rest of the stuff they're going to invade.
	Did they say, be afraid, put a mask on, go hide, isolate yourself?
	No, they said, keep calm.
	And carry on.
	Keep calm and carry on.
	That's what governments would do when there was an emergency.
	Stay calm. And I remember there was, oh, what's her name?
	Peggy Noonan. Speech writer for Ronald Reagan.
	And has been a writer of the Wall Street Journal since.
	She did a thing.
	Now's the time to panic.
	And I said, it's not the time to panic.
	It's never the time to panic.
	Panic never helps anybody.
	You panic, you're running around, you can't think, you can't do anything.
	If you lock everybody down, you can't grow food, you can't deliver food, you can't provide health care if everybody's locked down and isolated.
	What are they talking about?
	It doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
	None of it made any sense unless you knew the dark winter plan that they'd practiced for 20 years.
	And then it's like, they're pulling this now.
	This is what they're executing now.
	The plan that they practiced for 20 years.
	The plan that they first practiced two months before 9-11.
	The other shoe to drop from 9-11.
	So you keep calm, you carry on.
	The other sign that they had that I talked about on that Monday, the 16th of March, 2020.
	The other sign that you don't see made out of t-shirts and all that kind of stuff is freedom is in peril.
	Defend it with all your might.
	Keep calm and defend freedom with all your might.
	And that's what we had to do.
	We had to stay calm, not let them panic us into fear and defend it.
	But I like this article that just came out yesterday on LifeSite.
	Why I'm grateful for what my local sheriff did during the COVID tyranny.
	You understand? And this person wrote this thing saying, I'm so glad that he kept calm.
	I'm so glad that he defended the Constitution.
	You see? Because, and they were in Virginia, I think, which is, you know, depending on where you are, it can be really bad.
	It's close to Washington, D.C. This person said, I recently read Dr.
	Robert Malone's post about his life on a rural horse farm in Virginia, how he's enjoying his work there.
	I think this person is there as well.
	But anyway, Robert Malone said, the truth is the COVID crisis is done.
	No, that's not the truth.
	That's not the truth. And I'm enjoying work on the farm again.
	This is a pause, as I've said before, and I'll say it again.
	We're in the eye of the storm.
	If you think this is done, then you still don't understand the big picture.
	He doesn't understand the big picture.
	He was late to the party, if you will, because he wasn't looking at the politics of this.
	He was looking at the medical side of this.
	And I'm glad that he and some others have focused on that.
	And even though he has talked about some of the psychological aspects and some of the other things like that, he doesn't understand the fourth turning.
	He doesn't understand the time that we're in yet.
	And we better get up to speed quickly.
	Because you understand, this next election is going to take us basically to 2030.
	This next election, next year, 2024.
	The president gets signed in or remains in office, whoever wins or whatever, in 2025.
	And will be there until the next president is signed in in 2029.
	And so we have to understand that this next presidency is going to be crucial.
	There's going to be one crisis after the other.
	And if you look at the field of people that are there, It should give you a real cause for concern.
	Because I don't see anybody that's up to the task.
	Not a single person.
	On either party. That includes RFKJ, DeSantis, all of them.
	I don't see anybody that's up to taking care of this.
	So it's going to be up to you. That's why I say the local sheriff is the most important election coming up.
	And then other people in your local state area.
	Suddenly you realize...
	Said the coronavirus is over, writes this writer.
	Again, repeating Dr.
	Robert Malone, who says it's great.
	I'm at the farm again.
	I am in avoidance mode with my cell phone, a social media, an email.
	But my fitness is climbing back up and I need a break and all the rest of the stuff.
	Look, he's doing good stuff.
	He's working on his farm.
	He's got a garden and other things like that.
	He's in a much better shape than we are.
	We're not doing that type of thing.
	Even though I warn everybody about it, I'm still...
	So caught up with social media and news and all the rest of this stuff.
	That put my life on hold with this stuff.
	But he said, you know, to say that this is over, he doesn't understand it.
	He's still prepping anyway.
	He doesn't realize that.
	That's a good thing. This person says, suddenly you realize the corona crisis is over and all the agonies and all the distress are over.
	Just simply going to shop groceries for the family.
	If I'm doing that, the worries about that, all that is gone.
	Well, if they're saying, I'm not worried about it, and I don't think they're saying that.
	I think they're worried about the way that they're going to be treated when they went somewhere.
	But this is not over if we don't hold these people accountable.
	If we don't hold the Matt Hancocks accountable, it's not over.
	If we don't hold the Trumps and the Bidens accountable, it's not over.
	And if we don't prohibit anybody, anybody from ever doing this again, it's not over.
	We've got to, there's got to be consequences for the people who do this.
	And they're out there manufacturing crimes and all the rest of the stuff for each other.
	They're giving themselves a major pass on the corruption, the Biden czar, for all the money that they laundered and all the rest of the stuff.
	But look, folks. That is not nearly as dangerous as giving himself a pass for mandating this vaccine.
	He ought to be in jail.
	He should not be running.
	He ought to be impeached for that.
	Why aren't the Republicans talking about impeaching him for what he did to us with the pandemic?
	Because they don't care what he did to us.
	Because they were part of that as well.
	They don't see that as a crime.
	They don't even talk about it as if it were a mistake for the most part.
	The Democrats are bragging about it.
	Just like Trump bragged about his vaccine, the Democrats brag about their medical martial law.
	And so that's the real dangerous thing.
	They did this to acclimate people.
	This is the biggest psychological part of this at all.
	And that's why I'm surprised to see that Robert Malone doesn't understand that.
	You know, he talks about the mass psychology in this.
	But the mass psychology... Was to expose people to this and then pull it back.
	It's one of the things that they do in the films, right?
	They show you what they want to do in some kind of dystopian science fiction world, which is something that they're already planning and working on doing.
	And it's not...
	The way it works in Hollywood, for the longest time, CIA had a website.
	I used to do reports on this.
	I did several reports on it.
	Look at the CIA's website.
	Hey, movie makers, we got scripts that we've already written for you.
	They're pretty interesting. Would you like to try some of these things?
	We'll help you with this.
	In the same way that the military will help people, if they've got a script that they want to do, and if it is friendly to the military, oh yeah, we'll give you the jets and let you shoot on our aircraft carrier and all the rest of this stuff.
	You want some tanks? We got some tanks too.
	You want any of that stuff? We'll help you with that.
	No problem. A friend of mine, Worked in the Pentagon.
	Used to be part of that group.
	They would look at scripts, and it's like, oh, okay, well, if you're friendly to the U.S. military, we'll do everything we can to give you free access to this stuff.
	But if you criticize this in your script, if you're anti-war, anti-Pentagon, oh, no, you're not going to get any of this stuff.
	And so you have, in the same way, the CIA puts together scripts.
	Like, this is a pretty interesting idea, isn't it?
	Oh, yeah, that is interesting.
	And they make the movie. And that's how the CIA lets you know what they're going to do.
	But, of course, in the movie, there's always one person, one hero, who thwarts this entire global plan, right?
	Takes down Skynet and all the rest of this stuff, or whatever.
	And that's one of the things that, and so you see this really scary thing, it's like, oh, yeah, okay, that's all right.
	All we need is one person who can do that.
	And then you make the connection.
	Maybe that person could be Trump.
	After all, he's got superpowers.
	He's a billionaire. And look at what he's saying.
	He's saying the right stuff. He'll protect us.
	So they feed you this dystopia.
	Then they feed you the illusion that you're going to be protected from that by that person or by somebody maybe that's not even on the horizon.
	That's what's so dangerous about all this stuff.
	If we don't prohibit this and if we don't punish this, And prohibit it from ever happening in the future.
	We're in big trouble. But getting back to how we fight this, there are things that we can do.
	As he points out, our local sheriff, Mark Butler, himself seemed to agree with us that it was up to the individual citizen to make personal health choices.
	For example, whether or not to meet with other people.
	In January the 23rd, 2021, interview...
	That is, in the middle of the lockdowns and the coronavirus restrictions, this is right after all the January 6th stuff, and Biden has just been signed in three days earlier, Butler made it clear that he was a strong defender of the U.S. Constitution.
	He told a local media outlet that, quote, I believe 100% in the Constitution.
	If we start messing with the Constitution, we start messing with who we are as America, he said.
	And then he told his audience in a meeting, He said, I raise my hand to protect the Constitution.
	And as a sheriff, I will enforce the laws and protect the Constitution.
	In the context of the then widely spread mask mandates, he explained that while he himself wore a mask at work, it does not mean that he will force others to do the same.
	Am I going to arrest somebody who is not wearing it?
	A mask? No, I do not have that authority.
	He also insisted that he would not arrest people for gathering at homes.
	I'm not going to arrest somebody because they have 15 people in their house.
	Or 20. I don't know that that is constitutional, he said.
	Because the First Amendment guarantees the right of people to peacefully assemble.
	A right that sadly many elected officials and government bureaucrats completely disregarded, says this writer.
	Together with a local Commonwealth's attorney, Butler, Sheriff Butler, was then examining everything that comes down from the governor's office, he said.
	If it is constitutional, we will support it.
	If it is unconstitutional, we will check with our lawyers in the county and our Commonwealth attorney and see whether they agree, he said at the time.
	This is the lesser magistrate's idea.
	And you understand that this is where...
	You have your most power.
	Can we get rid of the people at the top?
	Well, no. As much as you know about Trump, you're not going to be able to stop him from getting the nomination.
	And it remains to be seen, I don't think that the Democrats are going to stop him from getting the nomination.
	I don't think that's even their goal.
	They understand, just as I do, that every time they throw these ridiculous charges at him, and as people see this unequal justice system, it only makes them more and more popular.
	And they know that they can beat him in the general election, and I think they will.
	You've got to get rid of the bad people, you've got to keep the good ones, you've got to look at the local level.
	Because it's not going to, it's not over, and it's going to be escalating, As we go to the great takedown, which has got to happen before they can have their society in 2030.
	It's going to be this next five, six years.
	It's going to happen. And the next election is going to be very key, but there's very little that you can do about that.
	But you can look at the sheriff and you can have something to say about that.
	Take a look at some new corruption that has been, Sean, on this massive universal basic income, welfare, bailout, whatever you want to call it, the PPP, the CARES Act that was put in by Trump in 2020.
	This is all on Trump right here.
	This is from Reason Magazine, a trucking company, that is careening toward bankruptcy.
	He's careening, like out of control, giant semi-trailer, and a whole bunch of them, as a matter of fact.
	They could default on a $700 million federal bailout loan from Trump.
	And since they got it, they've only paid $230 on the principal.
	This is worse than your home mortgage.
	They got a $700 million loan and they paid $230,000.
	Not $230,000.
	$230 on the principal.
	You know, in addition to the outright fraud that we've talked about in the past, how many people fraudulently got this stuff?
	And then, I guess we could call it, you know, they didn't have a business, they didn't have anything.
	You know, they just send the paperwork in, they get the big checks.
	There's been some high-profile busts of that, but not everybody has been caught.
	And then we know that because Trump redefined what a small business is, he says, oh, we're going to help small businesses.
	And let me tell you what a small business is.
	It's not a company that has fewer than 500 employees, as we've always said.
	No, it's going to be now, anybody's got fewer than 500 employees at a given location.
	So that means all the big chains can get the money as well.
	And we saw that more than 50% of the money went to less than 5% of the people.
	And then you've got the giant corporations like this one.
	Yellow Corporation, it's a freight shipping company.
	It's previously known as YRC Worldwide.
	The New York Times reported this week that They got the $700 million.
	They've not sent it back. But it was also, this program was supposed to go to companies that would otherwise be profitable.
	If they're on their way down the drain, they shouldn't have gotten this money.
	And yet this YRC had lost $104 million in 2019 down from a net income of $20 million the previous year.
	So they went from making $20 million down to losing $104 million the year before they put this out.
	And that was the most recent financial statement that they had.
	The money for the loan came from a $17 billion fund established by Trump to assist companies deemed crucial to national security.
	The Treasury Department said in October of 2020, as they were defending this, who was president in October of 2020?
	Yeah, Trump still there.
	YRC, they said, carries 68% of the Department of Defense's less-than-truckload shipments and is the leading transportation provider to the Department of Homeland Security and Customs and Border Protection.
	And yet at the same time, YRC was also being sued by the Justice Department for defrauding the government by artificially inflating the weights of its shipments.
	And they eventually settled the case two years later for just under $7 million.
	But they got $700 million.
	So 1% of it.
	So they got $700 million from the government.
	They gave them back $7 million for fraud.
	And then they paid $230 on the principal.
	Last month, the Office of Special Inspector General for the Pandemic Recovery released an audit on this loan, which is now this company, because they're having problems, they decided that they're going to correct all this, and they changed their name.
	Yellow Corporation.
	Yellow Corporation. So, two years into this four-year loan, they have paid a total of $230 in one payment that they made in June 2021.
	They made a single payment, and they paid $230.
	As Reason noted, more than one-sixth of the $1.2 trillion dispersed through these programs, that's the PPP stuff in the CARES Act, was stolen.
	Outright fraud.
	They don't even have a business.
	In some ways, a loan to Yellow Corporation might even be worse.
	Even with no fraud on display, the government will be left holding $700 million in debt and 30% of a bankrupt company.
	There you go. Thanks to Trump.
	Well, of course, he's had a lot of experience with bankrupt.
	Yeah, I think it was like five or six casinos that went bankrupt.
	And as I've said before, how in the world do you go bankrupt with a casino?
	Do you not understand math?
	You know, casinos are built to take advantage of people who don't understand math.
	But I guess maybe Trump falls into that category.
	I don't know. Yeah, C.J. Hopkins talks about going to...
	An event in the UK. Matt Taiby was there.
	Russell Brand was there. He said, as he got there and he talked to other people, and they were talking, well, what happens next?
	They understand this isn't done.
	He said, I was horrified to find that the same totalitarian program is being rolled out everywhere around the world.
	Oh, well, yes, exactly.
	Always has been. What happened through all the so-called pandemic panic and everything?
	It's the same program everywhere.
	But they're still rolling out new stuff in terms of censorship and surveillance and the police state and all the rest of this stuff.
	And that's what he's talking about.
	Matt Taibbi, when he spoke, he said, what Michael and I were looking at was something new.
	An internet age approach to political control that uses brute digital force to alter reality itself.
	We certainly saw plenty of examples of censorship and deplatforming and government collaboration in those efforts.
	However, it's clear that the idea behind the sweeping system of digital surveillance, combined with thousands or even millions of subtle rewards and punishments built into the online experience, is to condition people to censor themselves.
	Censor themselves.
	And that's what...
	Totalitarian governments do.
	That's why Solzhenitsyn said, do not live my lives.
	Do not censor yourself.
	This is why I refuse to play the game on any of these social media platforms or on YouTube.
	I refuse to use these little code words.
	I kept seeing people saying, well, you know, I want to talk about, you know, the thing, the thing that's out there.
	They're going to start mandating that thing.
	Should you take that thing?
	Is that thing safe? You know what I'm talking about, don't you?
	I can't say it here, you know, because I'm on YouTube.
	I wasn't going to play that game.
	You start censoring yourself and you start pussyfooting around with that kind of stuff and you're done.
	You know, we have to call it what it is.
	And it is tyranny.
	And it is at the very core of this is to get you to censor yourself.
	I just don't understand what has happened to our society.
	I don't understand what has happened to journalism.
	I look at this and everybody wants me to take a side.
	As I said before, I need to make a clip of Treebeard.
	I'm altogether not on anybody's side because nobody is on my side.
	But it's bigger than that.
	As a journalist, I'm supposed to be objective.
	I'm supposed to be in opposition to these politicians.
	I'm supposed to be skeptical about them, just like in science.
	You're supposed to be adversarial.
	Somebody's got a theory or something that they're telling you that they've discovered.
	Well, if you're a scientist, you're supposed to be in opposition to that.
	You're supposed to be skeptical of that.
	You're supposed to say, prove it.
	That's not to be a bad person.
	But you've got to say, well, you've got to prove that.
	What's your proof? And we're supposed to be that way when it comes to politicians as well, when it comes to political science.
	We're supposed to be skeptical.
	Oh yeah? Well, what has this guy done in the past?
	Look at what he's saying now.
	What has he done in the past?
	Let's take a look at the evidence that we've got here, which is his own statements that he's had in the past.
	That's what we're supposed to do.
	I get all this stuff from people.
	Why are you so negative? Don't you like anybody?
	No. I like people.
	I don't like politicians. I put them in separate categories.
	I don't like what they're doing.
	And so we need to question what they're doing.
	And if you jump into this thing because, well, I like Trump or I like the Republican Party or whatever, you're no better than the people who followed Fauci, followed him around and put the masks on their face.
	It's that kind of group thing.
	That kind of unwillingness to question authority and to examine what these people are saying.
	The unwillingness to look for the truth.
	Don't you want to know what the truth is about these people?
	I just frankly don't understand it.
	I guess you had to be there in the 20th century to understand this stuff.
	Too many people have forgotten that basis.
	He said it was horrifying to listen to my colleagues report on the state of things in their countries.
	Or rather, the thing that should be horrifying, but is becoming a mundane fact of life, is that more or less the same totalitarian program is being rolled out in countries throughout the world.
	None dare call it conspiracy.
	None dare call it a global conspiracy.
	But of course we knew that was the case.
	The censorship. He gives a bullet point.
	He says, this is what we're seeing everywhere.
	Censorship, official propaganda, criminalization of dissent, pathologicalization of dissent.
	You are diseased if you've got this.
	The manipulation of our perception of reality.
	The coordinated transformation of the world into a smiley-faced neo-Orwellian police state in which politics no longer matters because society has been divided into two basic classes.
	The normals, who are prepared to mindlessly follow orders and parrot whatever official propaganda they're fed, or the deviants or the extremists who question what they're told, who think critically about what they're told.
	No, you've got to fall in line and be happy about following one of these two guys that did this lockdown stuff to us.
	One of them created the vaccines, the other one mandated the vaccines.
	They're all there with a lockdown, and they're all there on the global plan, in lockstep.
	And so he says, as you sit there in whichever nominally sovereign country you're sitting there reading this in, ask yourself, how and why is this happening?
	And why is it happening now?
	Well, if you see the 2030 stuff, you know.
	You know why it's happening. He said, the problem is that we can't see the forest for the trees.
	But our adversaries see the forest.
	They see the forest like eagles.
	They own the forest and everything in it.
	While we hop like squirrels from tree to tree, distracted from one distraction by distraction, from limited hangout by limited hangout, They're building a big fence around the forest, and they're deploying the forest ranger Gestapo.
	That's exactly right.
	He says, I'm reminded of that infamous Karl Rove quote, where he said, well, the way the world, he says, that's not the way the world works anymore.
	He says, we're in an empire now, and we act and we create our own reality.
	And while you're studying that reality judiciously as you will, We will act again.
	And we will create other new realities.
	Which you can study too.
	And that's how things will sort out.
	We are history's actors.
	And you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.
	He said that in an interview with the New York Times Magazine.
	But here's the thing that Karl Rove doesn't understand.
	And that is that If people understand what is going on, he's not going to get away with this.
	That's why they were working so hard on the censorship and the propaganda.
	That's their vulnerable point, information.
	Secondly, all politics is local.
	It's not national. It's not global.
	Politics is local.
	They can have their big schemes and we need to understand what their schemes are.
	We need to understand why they're doing this and why they're doing it now and what their plans are.
	But all politics is local.
	Everything has to happen at the local level.
	The Democrats have known this for a long time.
	They and many others have talked about it.
	This is one of the axioms of political science.
	In the same way, they have to get the kids at an early age and train them to think like them, to be loyal to them, to see them as defining everything, the source of authority and all the rest of this stuff.
	They want to get the kids at an early age, but they also know they have to make this stuff happen locally.
	And that's how we can block it locally.
	And if we block this locally, there's not anything they can do about it, frankly.
	You act locally.
	You pull together your share for your local community.
	You learn how to feed yourself.
	All of that is the key.
	And if you're a Christian, you understand that this is just a spiritual war.
	We have weapons that are mightier than Karl Rove, far mightier than anything he can call up.
	God is in control, and God is mighty.
	So if we look at just what the globalists are doing, or if we look just at what Washington is doing, for example, We're looking at trees.
	We're not looking at the forest.
	The forest has got so much in it, and we can't just stop at what we see physically.
	You know, there's an entire unseen realm, and it rules.
	And I'm reminded of what happened, the story of Elisha.
	And there was a war going on.
	He was giving the king of Israel intelligence about what was happening.
	He knew where the, you know, God told him where the other army was going to go, and he would tell the king of Israel.
	And the enemy king learned that he was the one who was doing it.
	So they sought him out.
	They said, find out where this guy is.
	They found out where he was. They sent an army to kill him.
	And Elisha's there with his servants.
	And this massive army shows up, just for the two of them, really.
	And his servant is freaking out.
	And he says, no, those who are with us are mightier and larger.
	And so he prays that his servant's eyes will be opened.
	And he sees the valley that is filled with horses and chariots that the other army doesn't see.
	That's what we have to understand.
	We have to have the spiritual eyes to see this.
	We don't have to see this in a supernatural sense.
	We see this in what God has revealed to us.
	We see it with the eyes of faith.
	The story gets interesting after that.
	I'll leave it to you to see what happens next.
	You can see it in 2 Kings 6, or as Paul Harvey would say.
	And that's the rest of the story.
	We'll be right back. You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	The former president, Donald J. Trump, 45th president of the United States, put out this scathing news alert.
	The Biden administration did a terrible disservice to people throughout the world by allowing the FDA and CDC to call a, quote, pause in the use of the Johnson& Johnson COVID-19 vaccine.
	The results of this vaccine have been extraordinary.
	The Johnson& Johnson shot is no longer available.
	It was linked to a rare side effect of blood clots.
	They should not be able to do such damage for possibly political reasons or maybe because their friends at Pfizer have suggested it.
	They'll do things like this to make themselves look important.
	Johnson announced that their vaccine candidate has reached the final stage of clinical trials.
	This is record time. We encourage Americans to enroll in the vaccine trial.
	It's not only interesting, it'll be a terrific thing.
	The only way we defeat the China virus is with our great vaccines.
	Blood clots. Yeah, blood clots.
	Blood clots will defeat the China virus.
	It'll defeat Americans as well.
	Now, I played that. Isn't it interesting?
	You know, when he got so angry when it was paused.
	And the reality is not even scratched by the mainstream media.
	I remember when that happened.
	And I remember that as they were rolling out that untested Johnson& Johnson vaccine that Trump was so proud of.
	One of the three that he was so proud of.
	And he said, well, they shouldn't be allowed to do damage like this to make themselves look important.
	That's how he basically, what he did.
	He's projecting onto the FDA and the CDC when they paused it.
	Oh, they're trying to make themselves look important.
	No, it was Trump who was trying to make himself look important who did all this damage to everybody.
	And so, as they were rolling that thing out, it was the last of the three to go out.
	And as they did it, I remember when it happened.
	In four different states, at four different locations, you had four dozen people.
	It's easy to remember. Who immediately passed out when they got the Johnson& Johnson.
	And they put it on hold because they didn't want people seeing that.
	And they stopped. They wouldn't talk about that.
	It was initially reported and then they changed the narrative.
	And the reason that the FDA and the CDC put that on pause was to distract people from that.
	And then they came out and they held it for a week or so.
	And they said, well, you know, we've got six people with blood clots.
	All female. And we've had, you know, six million of these things being put out.
	Again, it was right at the beginning, but they were rapidly rolling this thing out.
	And so they said, it's rare.
	It's rare. So we're going to keep on with it.
	We don't care. And in the VAERS database, they had over 800 people who had had blood clots after these shots at that time.
	It wasn't six people. Though the whole thing was a lie, always has been a lie.
	Handy sent this to me, this story that has come out of real clear wire, picked up on WND. He said, besides the story of the lady who was injured by the jabs, another neurologic injury, he said, look at how HHS states that there were only 500 claims for the entirety of the program until now.
	There are over 10,000 claims for COVID injuries per their own statement.
	And they have to hire more staff to process these claims, yet these shots are still being pushed.
	It's amazing, isn't it? And they go back and say, well, we've only had 500 of these claims or whatever like this.
	If that's true, now, after just a couple of years, they've got a backlog of 10,000.
	A lot of people don't even know about this program to report and to try to get some compensation.
	So what caused the explosion from 500 to 10,000 and you don't care about that?
	Twenty-fold increase?
	And that's not the story here?
	The headline is COVID vaccine victims face off against a federal bureau that's gone silent.
	Well, it's not a COVID vaccine.
	It's a Trump vaccine.
	Give him credit. He wants the credit.
	Come on, WND. Real clear wire.
	They don't want to give him the credit.
	Well, he deserves the credit for this.
	They'll always put us a subtitle on their vaccine shots at WND, and they will not stop cheering Trump.
	Well, they'll put the shot hurt around the world.
	That's what it is.
	That's what I've called it as well.
	The phone keeps ringing. No one is emailing.
	Nobody is doing anything. Nobody is responding on comments on Rumble.
	A1BingleFan says, Trump also stated in 98, in his perfect America, nobody owns guns.
	Well, he tried to make that come true.
	He established the precedent of doing gun control by executive order.
	Can you imagine what he would do in his second term?
	Where he wants to be thought well of by the majority of people, and he would perceive, being a New Yorker, that the majority of people don't want guns.
	Do you think he would care about the Second Amendment at all?
	Do you think he cares about any laws or regulations?
	No, he would just be doing whatever he thought was going to make the most friends or give him the best press in his legacy.
	On Rumble, Shevkin says, the J&J vaccine killed a friend of mine in September 2021.
	I'm sorry to hear that.
	It is amazing. You know, that's the thing.
	It is, from the very beginning in January, when they're rolling out Pfizer and Moderna, and we're seeing people drop dead.
	And I said, this has never happened with vaccines before.
	Look, we've got more people killed in just the first few weeks than we did in several years combined.
	And it eventually kept increasing and increasing until it got to be way more than they'd had with all vaccines for 35 years they've been following this thing.
	So it is truly amazing.
	And yet they won't stop it.
	And as I pointed out before, we had nine states ban one of the flu shot vaccines after three people died.
	Three people.
	We've had far more than that verified with this.
	In April 2021, Adele Fox received a single shot of the Johnson& Johnson vaccine.
	Within a few hours, the 60-year-old resident of New Hampshire started feeling shooting pains in her legs, arms, and neck.
	The pain did not abate over the next few days.
	Instead, it got worse and was accompanied by nausea and debilitating fatigue.
	Within a few hours, neurologists affiliated with Massachusetts General Hospital diagnosed her with several serious conditions they said were a result of the vaccine, including small-fiber neuropathy, which causes painful tingling in the extremities, and a syndrome, which is Sjogren's syndrome.
	I don't know if I'm pronouncing that correctly.
	It's got the... Umlaut over the O. It leaves patients pained and fatigued and in stream cases can damage internal organs.
	This shot, which was supposed to get Fox back to normal, instead left her with diminished ability to work and enjoy life.
	Persistent physical therapy and experimental treatments that she's taken since have done little to alleviate her symptoms.
	She said, I used to get so much done and now it's a struggle every day.
	Sometimes you just get down.
	With her medical bills mounting and her condition not improving, she sought compensation for her damaged health.
	Federal liability protections prevent the vaccine injured from directly suing vaccine manufacturers like Johnson & Johnson.
	And so Real Clear Wire goes on to explain the two different programs.
	As they put it, two starkly different injury programs for vaccines.
	They claim that in recent decades they have approved 75% of the claims for the childhood vaccine program, which Fauci got through under Reagan in 1986.
	But then their second one is the one that was part of the PrEP Act that was part of Bush and his 9-11 Dark Winter schemes.
	That was done in 2005.
	And they say that one has awarded less than $10,000 since the pandemic.
	And in a nation nearly numb to the pandemic's toll and its scandals, the program is adding seething frustration atop lasting injury to Fox and people like her in a little reported aftermath of the government's much criticized performance on vaccines.
	She filed her claim two years ago, submitting hundreds of pages of medical documents about her condition and her diagnoses.
	She's nevertheless one of the 10,887 people still waiting on a decision.
	She said, you're not even hearing anything from the organization that is supposed to be helping you.
	The phone keeps ringing and no one is emailing.
	Nobody is doing anything. Real clear investigations.
	So the number of claims, quote, significantly exceeds the previous volume in the program, they were told, by Health Resources and Services Administration.
	They're the ones who are administering it.
	The program has hired an additional staff to address this growth in claims.
	The president's budget requests additional funding to support the additional staffing needed to process the claims.
	They're buried. And yet, the vaccines go on.
	The vaccines go on.
	On Rockfin, Aaron H. says, Thank you.
	Heard the song, Heaven Let Your Light Shine Down, on the radio last night.
	And... I said to my hubby, I wish heaven would let its light shine down.
	The earth needs it right now.
	I checked the obits from my local town back home in Australia, and I'm seeing more and more younger people, 54, 34, etc., dying unexpectedly at home, quote-unquote.
	Not sure when any of them are going to get put two and two together.
	Yeah, that reminds me of, and I've played the clip several times, of the mother who said, it just dawned on me as I started talking about sudden adult death syndrome.
	I never put two and two together before, right?
	She said she had a healthy child, went down and got the vaccines, and within a couple of days, the child suddenly died.
	She couldn't put it together. And then she broke into tears and said, it just dawned on me that I killed my child with a vaccine.
	No, you didn't kill them.
	Other people killed your child with the vaccines and with lies and with intimidation.
	They killed your child.
	You didn't kill your child. Roxanne, Caravella.
	Funny how the UK is reporting that mortality rates are the lowest among unvaccinated in all ages.
	Yeah, that's true.
	True. So going back to this, the Dark Winter 9-11 model legislation that all handed out, they said the second one, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program that was part of the PREP Act, As a result of the War on Terror legislation in 2005, yeah. It was a plan.
	This is the second shooter drop.
	They planned it, they practiced it two months before 9-11.
	False flag a week after.
	The model legislation two months after that.
	And then they practiced it for 20 years.
	It's a long run. These people lay their plans for a long time, don't they?
	Well, you know, they trust in their chariots and horses.
	We don't trust in that.
	The earlier program was supposed to shore up pharmaceutical companies.
	It said real clear investigations.
	Yeah, they meant well.
	They meant well. The earlier program was just horrific in what they did.
	Special masters decide the cases.
	And between 2006 and 2021, this court adjudicated cases from 10,602 petitioners, issued compensation to 7,618 of them.
	This earlier program bears little resemblance, however, to the countermeasures injury compensation program.
	By the way, they spent out $4 billion, and it's only a tiny fraction of the people who have injured.
	It's not 75%.
	A tiny fraction.
	It is like an arbitration thing.
	You don't really have a true court hearing.
	You don't have a jury. If you had a jury, this would go the way of the big tobacco things and should go that way, but it's not.
	They make sure that doesn't happen.
	So on the countermeasures program, COVID vaccine cases for Fox and many others are just sitting there.
	It was meant to incentivize pharmaceutical companies, I said, to be part of the federal response to a one-off, one-in-a-million event, like a bioweapon attack.
	No, that's not what it was meant for.
	They practiced this for 20 years.
	They'd been practicing it for four years before they put this legislation in.
	This was meant to protect the pharmaceutical companies who were going to partner with the government in a bioweapon attack against its own people, which is what happened here.
	And I'll keep saying that.
	They keep hiding the program.
	That's fine. I'm going to keep saying that if anybody hears it.
	This is what happened. It was the vaccine was a bioweapon attack.
	They keep going back.
	To this Wuhan thing.
	People pointing the finger at Fauci.
	Pointing the finger at NIH. Pointing the finger at the Chinese and all the rest of the stuff.
	Heard Trump. The Wu flu.
	The China flu. All this other stuff.
	No. His vaccines were the bioweapon.
	Nobody died from this stuff.
	They died from medical malpractice.
	They died from being denied treatment.
	They died by being sent home until they were beyond the point of being treated.
	And then they would put them on invasive ventilators and give them bronchial pneumonia in addition to what other conditions they had.
	They would give people remdesivir, which doesn't do anything, but it does harm your liver.
	It won't do anything.
	That isn't medical malpractice.
	Even the masks on faces were cynical medical malpractice.
	So yeah, you've got a strain of the flu that's different.
	So what? We've always had that.
	We've always had the flu capable of killing people who had other health issues.
	There's nothing new about that.
	This was not a bioweapon attack.
	They keep falling back to that.
	The bioweapon was the vaccine.
	That was the bioweapon attack.
	And these pharmaceutical companies were given immunity to participate in this act of war against their own people.
	Every government doing it.
	It has been asked to make decisions on over 10,000 injury claims related to the COVID countermeasures.
	And as of June, it has made decisions on only 919 of these.
	And it has rejected $894 out of $919.
	They've only approved $25.
	And then it gets even worse when you look at how much money they've paid out.
	$8,593.
	So let's look at this.
	They rejected 97% of these claims.
	They've only looked at...
	Less than 10%.
	Let's say 9% of what they say is out there.
	They said they got 10,000 claims.
	They looked at about 900 of them.
	So they've looked at 9%.
	Of those 9%, they've out just rejected 97%.
	And of course, there is no hearing with this.
	This is an administrative process that you don't even participate in.
	That's why she keeps calling up.
	What's going on with this? Well, we'll get around to it, you know, we'll have somebody, someday we'll get to your piece of paper, they'll take a look at it and say, nah, nah, you know, toss it in the trash.
	So 97% of them are rejected.
	Of the remaining 3%, if you look at that $8,600 that was paid out, just under, and you got 25 people who were approved for that, that's an average payout of $344.
	Can you believe that? This is something that has destroyed her life, destroyed a lot of other people's lives.
	Sorry, we ruined your life.
	You're in pain. You're suffering.
	You can't do anything. There's $344.
	Have a nice life.
	The Trump administration.
	The Biden administration.
	The two people who are the frontrunners in the presidential race right now, by a long shot.
	Those two guys. It's not a judicial process either.
	It's an administrative process, overseen by the people that's a branch of HHS, the Health Resources and Safety Administration.
	HHS is deciding whether to pay for damages caused by a product that it approved, and in some cases, it mandated.
	And because it's an administrative process, there is no right to counsel.
	There is no right to neutral arbitrator.
	A denied claimant can file for reconsideration by the same organization, but otherwise there's no right to appeal.
	You see, when they make this a bureaucratic process, just like we see with everything else, right?
	You're innocent until proven guilty with all these other things, whether it's the IRS or whether it's the FAA. There's no protection against excessive fines and those types of things.
	But when you're trying to get compensation, you're considered...
	To be healthy. And you're going to have to prove all this other stuff.
	But you don't have any arbitrator.
	You don't have any due process.
	You're not even allowed to participate in the process.
	If you don't like what they say when they deny you, as they've done now 97% of the time, all you can do is ask them to reconsider.
	The same people to reconsider.
	The same people that pushed the vaccine out.
	The same people who approved it.
	The same people who mandated it.
	The highest award so far has been $3,957 to one person who got myocarditis, a heart condition, from the vaccine.
	So this person now has had a heart damaged permanently.
	Permanently limiting what they're going to do.
	They got just under $4,000.
	Okay, well, let's take that out of the $8,600 that they paid everybody else, and let's see what that works out then for the per average.
	As I said first, you know, well, $344 average per person.
	Well, if this one person got a whopping $4,000 for permanent damage to their heart, then what did the other 24 people get on average?
	$193. This is just amazing.
	This is your government. These are the people who can find another $2 billion to $3 billion because of an accounting error in the Pentagon.
	Oh, now we found another $6 billion for that?
	And we'll do whatever it takes to send weapons to kill people in Ukraine.
	We'll do whatever it takes to keep pushing towards a nuclear war.
	But I'm not going to give you anything for the bioweapon I shot you with.
	That's your government. It also has short filing deadlines.
	You have to file a claim within one year of vaccination.
	It's a much shorter window than the Fauci immunity clause, if you will.
	It destroys your immunity, but it gives financial immunity to the vaccine companies that destroy your physical immunity.
	That one had three years.
	From the onset of symptoms.
	But this one is just one year from the date of vaccination.
	Of the 894 claims that CICP has rejected, 444 of them were for missing the filing deadline.
	That's about half of these. And think about the fact that we have our government, the Democrats at least, are pushing reparations for something that happened 160 years ago.
	The only purpose of those racial reparations is to poke and to provoke a race war.
	They're not going to do anything about reparations to people that they damaged in their vaccine war.
	Think about that.
	I mean, they're trying to set us against each other.
	They are using lies and propaganda and threats and coercion to mandate people to get this stuff, and then when people are injured, they won't give them anything.
	97% of the people got nothing.
	The rest of the people got less than $200, except for one individual.
	Fox filed her claim in May of 2021, which is relatively early in the immunization campaign.
	They knew all this stuff, of course, from the very beginning.
	They knew it before they were rolling it out.
	She also had clear diagnoses from well-credentialed doctors linking her conditions to the vaccination.
	She said she provided the program with no shortage of documentation as well.
	She even reached out, since she didn't hear anything from them, she called her congressional representatives, congressmen and senators.
	They reached out on her behalf.
	They called her personally twice, once in July of 2022, again in June of 2023, but each time they could only offer her the reassurance that they'd received her paperwork.
	Other than that, we can't tell you anything.
	We'll eventually get to it, they said.
	And then they talk about one person who was denied, Cody Flint, one of the 894 people who've had their claim rejected.
	He was vaccinated in February 2021 when he received a single Pfizer dose.
	He says that he started to feel headaches and had affected vision within 30 minutes of the shot.
	He was still experiencing symptoms two days later when he headed to his job as a crop dusting pilot.
	While flying that day, he started to experience extreme tunnel vision, followed by the sensation he describes as a bomb going off in my head.
	He barely managed to get his plane back to the runway, where his co-workers found him slumped over his controls and shaking from the Trump shot.
	It's so good that we got this thing done.
	You know, those people at the FDA, they didn't want to do this this quickly.
	I threatened them.
	They hate me there, says Trump, but I got it done.
	Well, good for you, Benedict Donald.
	Given the timing of his symptoms and the fact that he had passed a flight physical just a couple of weeks prior, his doctor said his condition was almost certainly caused by the vaccine.
	His injury prevented him from returning to work as a pilot.
	His mounting medical bills saw him draw down all of his savings.
	So his health has been destroyed.
	His work has been taken away.
	And he gets absolutely no compensation.
	He filed a claim in April 2021.
	Didn't hear anything until May of 2022, just a few weeks after Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith asked HHS Secretary Javier Becerra about his case specifically in a committee hearing.
	As soon as she asked him specifically about this, they rejected his claim.
	Well, that'll teach you to embarrass me.
	The program's medical reviewers told Flint that it was more likely that his injuries were caused by barotrauma from flying a plane.
	In other words, barometric pressure, that type of thing.
	His doctors argued there was no way that he could have experienced barotrauma from flying just a few hundred feet off the ground.
	He's a crop duster.
	He's not flying at high altitude.
	It was absurd.
	An absurd excuse.
	Just like everything that Fauci has said.
	Everything that Trump has said and Biden has said.
	It's completely absurd.
	And they pointed out that commercial airlines, they pressurize the cabin to be equivalent to an elevation of 6,000 to 8,000 feet.
	This guy is flying a couple hundred feet off the ground as a crop duster.
	And they say, well, you've been injured by high-altitude flying.
	They don't care. They don't have to.
	The federal government's liability protection for the vaccines is not scheduled to expire until the end of 2024.
	Once they do, those claiming a vaccine injury will be able to pursue claims against vaccine manufacturers and state courts.
	Did you know that? That's very important.
	They're protected from this, but only until the end of 2024.
	Now, I would expect... That with their political clout, they'll get the government to extend this.
	But you can come after them in state court, and we're going to see that with another case of a different kind of government poisoning here in just a second.
	Whether or not the HHS and the organization underneath it, the HRSA, whether they succeed in boosting their staff Or not.
	Those seeking compensation will start or have started to get organized and they formed a group, React 19, to advocate for additional research into the side effects of COVID-19.
	Wouldn't it be nice if that had happened before they rolled this out?
	But Trump didn't want that. He's very proud of the fact that he didn't want any research into the side effects of this stuff.
	And of course, neither did Fauci, who was planning this for a long time.
	This has now grown into a network of tens of thousands of people who say that they suffered adverse injuries from the shot.
	They said, you say anything about the vaccine injuries and you're branded as an anti-vaxxer.
	We are pro-science.
	We are not political. We're just dealing with a very politicized issue.
	Well, let me say this. I have been looking at this vaccine injury thing for the longest time.
	I've looked at this politicized thing for so long that I am anti-vaxxed.
	I'm proud to say it. I'm anti-vaxxed.
	I'm anti-Fauci. I'm anti-Trump.
	I'm anti-Biden. And I'm proud to say it.
	I call the PREP Act a medical malpractice martial law.
	Says Representative Thomas Massey.
	This is the guy who's my congressman.
	He's in Kentucky. I'm in Tennessee.
	But he's the one guy I agree with.
	And we say the same thing.
	I've said that for the longest time, haven't I? I said, when you look at everything that they've done, it is financially incentivized medical malpractice, and it was Trump who was financially incentivizing it.
	And I said when they locked us down from the very beginning, I said this is medical martial law.
	And I had the Southern Poverty Law Center and Daily Beast call me out on that.
	Look at this. He's calling this medical martial.
	We've got to do this to save lives.
	This guy's dangerous. He needs to be shut down.
	He's telling people to ignore this stuff.
	We could all die because of David Knight calling this medical martial law.
	Well, Thomas Massey's telling you the truth.
	The PrEP Act and what was done with this stuff.
	It's medical malpractice martial law.
	He says its liability shield is both incredibly broad and improperly preempts state law.
	He said, I think it's sort of anathema to the way that government is set up.
	I found it hard to believe that Congress would pass something like this.
	Much less that a Republican president would invoke it.
	He's talking about Trump. But of course, think about the fact that the 1986 Act that Fauci put in for these childhood vaccines, that was under Reagan.
	And then all of this stuff with 9-11 and the dark winter stuff and the PrEP Act that came after that, that was done under Bush.
	They got Reagan, Bush, Trump.
	It's amazing, isn't it?
	They have to have the Republicans in there to do this stuff.
	Because they have to have it bipartisan.
	And they have to make sure that you're not going to push back against them.
	And of course, you know, Bush was very popular at the time.
	Reagan was a popular president.
	Trump was a popular president.
	Oh yeah, let's just go along with this program.
	Now, I said when you look at the fact that lawsuits and how the lawsuits, if they allow this to expire at the end of 2024, people can file lawsuits.
	And that's the kind of thing that is happening now with the Marines who were injured at Camp Lejeune.
	This was sent to me by Kevin, a listener.
	He said this is a month-old article, but it's a pretty good summary.
	The defense motions that the Department of Justice have put forward are very low.
	Not only that, but a defense isn't called for when the statute states that the government was at fault.
	But you see, when you look at how the Camp Lejeune water contamination injured people, who are still, a long time after this happened, still trying to fight for compensation.
	Of course, we see this type of thing happening all the time in the military.
	There is a history of apathy and arrogant indifference from our government, even to their own soldiers.
	They're arrogant about the injury that they caused.
	You would think that when they knew that they did it, they would have the decency to help these people.
	But they fight them on it. Why do they fight them on it?
	All they have to do is just call the Federal Reserve and say, can you print up some more of that paper money?
	They have unlimited money.
	And they don't have to account for it whatsoever.
	This is the principle under which they operate.
	Keynesian economics, the modern monetary theory, all of this stuff.
	They're not worried about the deficit.
	They just keep raising the ceiling and all the rest of this stuff.
	Why do they tax us?
	Because they hate us.
	Why don't they help people that they've harmed?
	Because they hate us.
	The government isn't moving quickly to compensate Camp Lejeune water contamination victims.
	Well, that's an understatement. These people were injured in 1953 to 1987.
	You know, so here we are, you know, nearly 40 years later for the most recent ones.
	And 70 years later for when it began.
	So, they're not moving quickly.
	That's the National Review news on this.
	First, victims must file an administrative claim with the Navy.
	Unfortunately, so far, the Navy has made zero offers to pay on any administrative claims.
	Six months after filing an administrative claim with the Navy, a lawsuit can be filed with federal courts in eastern North Carolina, where Camp Lejeune is.
	As of May 2023, The Navy has received more than 45,000 administrative claims, and over 900 lawsuits have been filed against the United States government and federal courts in eastern North Carolina.
	However, the government hasn't offered a single penny to resolve a single case yet.
	They're going to fight them for every cent.
	Isn't that amazing? Fight their own soldiers.
	And again, we're talking about some of these people 60 years old, 70 years ago that this began, this careless water contamination that was there.
	So the government says, well, this is damage caused by the water contamination.
	That's what you did and your family's dead.
	It's not my fault. That's their approach taken on this.
	And of course, our government has been deliberately dumping fluoride in the water for the longest time.
	That's another story we won't get into.
	Yesterday I talked about the professional basketball player who died.
	And I did not talk about the fact that he had already, as soon as he got the vaccine, had had issues.
	And he suffered myocarditis.
	And it's another illustration that Fauci and people like Walensky, they were talking about myocarditis.
	It's no big deal. You know, it's a temporary thing.
	And you get over it. And you've even had New York putting out public service announcements saying, well, your kids are now getting myocarditis, but don't worry about it.
	It's a temporary thing, and it'll go away.
	No, it'll be with them for the rest of their life.
	This guy is an example.
	28 years old, Oscar Cabrera Adames.
	And he was a basketball player.
	He developed myocarditis after getting two Pfizer shots.
	That's required for him in order to travel to Europe.
	And so he had posted on Instagram that he had developed myocarditis and was still searching for answers as to what was wrong with him.
	And as he was undergoing medical examination, they gave him a stress test and he died as he was doing the stress test.
	Not the first time. One of my best friends, that happened to his father.
	He had a heart condition.
	They put him on a stress test and it killed him.
	He says, I got myocarditis from taking an effing vaccine.
	I got two doses of Pfizer and I knew it!
	Many people warned me, he wrote on Instagram.
	But guess what? It was compulsory or I couldn't work.
	What did I say to you throughout all this blackmailing and coercion?
	I said, well, if you're going to take it, because otherwise you're not going to be able to work, what happens when you get injured, like the lady that we just talked about, Fox, or the pilot?
	What happens when you get injured and you can't work?
	Or what happens when you die?
	You can't work then either.
	Don't let them pressure you to do this or not have a job.
	And I also said, Whoever you're working for, if they want to pressure you to take an experimental vaccine, that's not the kind of person you want to work for.
	Do you think they're going to value you as an employee?
	They're treating you like absolute filth.
	They're treating you like a lab rat now.
	Do you think they're going to respect you in the morning?
	No. He says, I'm an international professional athlete.
	I have no health problems, nothing.
	Not hereditary, no asthma, nothing.
	I suddenly collapsed to the ground in the middle of a match and almost died, and I'm still recovering.
	And I've had 11 different cardiology tests done, and guess what?
	They find nothing. And then he died with a cardiac stress test.
	The American Heart Association calls myocarditis a serious, though rare, condition.
	It used to be rare. Now it's a household word.
	Like autism. Why was autism rare for a while, and then now everybody talks about it?
	Why is myocarditis rare, and now everybody talks about it?
	Hmm, I wonder what it could be.
	Must be a coincidence for something.
	The condition can weaken the heart and its electrical system, resulting in the inability to properly pump blood.
	Well, it's not minor, it's not temporary, and it certainly isn't rare now.
	Thank you, Trump. By the way, this guy was in Spain.
	This is Deaths Worldwide.
	He was playing in Spain. Mike Pence, Mr.
	Pro-Life, right? Talking about, oh, we've got to have a 15-week federal abortion ban, and now he's urging all of his Republican rivals to endorse this bad policy.
	And I say it's a bad policy, and I'll say it again, because you know that if they put in a limit and they lower it from whatever it was with Roe v.
	Wade, they lower it to 15 weeks.
	You know that all the Democrat states are going to refuse to obey that.
	And then when they get the majority, they're going to raise it and completely eliminate any restrictions on abortion whatsoever.
	And yet, all of the GOP states will obey that.
	And they will all allow abortion.
	It only works in one way.
	And at best, it would be a temporary quote-unquote solution, partial solution, a level that is higher than many of the states have right now in the South that want to ban abortion.
	If you want to ban abortion, you're going to take it six weeks or earlier.
	If you don't, you're not going to do it because there is a federal law.
	It's nullification like we've seen with marijuana.
	And so it's a bad policy.
	He's a bad candidate.
	He was a bad vice president.
	He was there, if you look at these press conferences where Trump is making his self-serving pronouncements about warp speed and all the rest of this stuff, Pence is there, like everybody else, with a mask on his face, selling the pandemic from the very beginning.
	So does he care about life?
	Does he really want limited government?
	Why is he re-federalizing this?
	He's re-federalizing abortion after the Supreme Court said, no, we have a 10th Amendment.
	That's not something we should be doing anything about.
	He's re-federalizing it for his benefit.
	He wants a wedge issue.
	The Republicans have always wanted that.
	The Democrats want it as well. They want that wedge issue back.
	The Democrats now are the only ones with a wedge issue.
	And for federal candidates.
	And so these federal candidates, like Pence, all want this back.
	And it's only going to work in one direction.
	As we talk about lawsuits, 300 Canadian soldiers have launched a $500 million lawsuit against the Canadian military.
	Good for them. Good for them.
	The CAF, Canadian Armed Forces, shirked its own purpose and rushed an untested product onto its members, mislabeled this experimental gene therapy a vaccine, knowingly made false statements of safety and efficacy, and facilitated its mandate with no option to refuse except for mandatory permanent removal from service, reads the lawsuit.
	That's how it begins.
	Boy, that is spot on.
	Let me read some of the comments that have accumulated here.
	On Rumble, Geese Busters, thank you very much.
	That's very kind of you.
	I appreciate that.
	David, can't wait for the Trump commercials.
	I hope there's a lot of them.
	Yeah, we're going to put some stuff together.
	I just haven't had the time, but it's a target-rich environment, isn't it?
	Where do I even start?
	There's so many different issues.
	On Rumble, Damnage says, I'm a federal employee in a three-letter agency.
	Well, that could be any of them.
	There's only a couple.
	They got four. I've served for 15 years, and I'm seeing in my work people in their 20s having heart attacks, blood clots, strokes, aneurysms like never before.
	It's just so sad.
	It really is. On Rumble, V-I-U-C, is that V-I-U-C? But thank you for the tip.
	I appreciate that. Say, do you think it has...
	Any effect to write or to call protests are government officials or is it a waste of time and a profile being built on you?
	Well, they got your profile anyway.
	Let's just understand. Don't censor yourself about anything because they know who you are and what you do.
	That's what all this stuff is about.
	And I do think that sometimes it does work.
	Sometimes it's a waste, but sometimes it does work.
	For example...
	And you can see, if you get back a form letter, where we lived in North Carolina, we had a very, very left-wing college professor.
	His name was David Price, who became a congressman.
	He was there forever. And in 1994, when they had the contract with America and they had the big turnover, he got kicked out for one term and they got him back in.
	Boy, the press really loved him and they got him back in the next time.
	He stayed in there the rest of his life.
	But he was my congressman where I lived and I would write him stuff.
	And I knew that he was adamantly opposed to anything that I would write.
	Community meetings about Hillary Care, as they were trying to rush that stuff through, you know, at the beginning, after the 92 election.
	And I went to some of those meetings and spoke at some of those meetings, and I knew that didn't make any difference either.
	And when I would send him stuff, I would get back a form letter, you know.
	And he would basically, thanks so much for writing, and we're going to do this and that anyway, and tell me that he was going to do what was diametrically opposed to what I had said.
	But they don't look at what you actually say.
	They measure the responses by the weight.
	Well, we got this many that are for this and this many that are against this and that type of thing.
	So, you know, don't waste your time trying to reason with these people.
	If anything persuades them, it's going to be the quantity of stuff that they get.
	And I have seen this work at the state level with homeschooling.
	As I've said before, at the beginning, you know, when homeschooling was still on shaky ground and it was still a big fight that was going on with the teachers' unions, Trying to shut it down, and the Democrats allied with them.
	And the Democrats were in the majority.
	And we had this big teachers union, big national unions were trying to shut down homeschooling with the Democrats.
	The Democrats were very favorable to that.
	And yet there was a massive letter-writing campaign from the homeschoolers.
	And there weren't that many of us, but, you know, people typically don't write.
	And so if they get something that is like, you know, 100 to 1...
	I don't know that anybody was writing them any letters in favor of it because it was something that was being pushed from the top down by the unions and the teaching establishment.
	And if so, it's going to be pretty much 100% on the other side.
	And if they get a lot of them, they may pay attention.
	So, you know, don't ever give up on that.
	Always try it. It's an easy thing to do, and you don't have to sit there and spend a lot of time trying to persuade them with arguments and that type of thing.
	Just tell them what you think, because they're not going to pay attention to your arguments, and that may have an effect, hopefully.
	But it's worth trying.
	I think it is...
	At least as good as voting, if not better than voting, to send them a letter, in my opinion.
	Rumble, Atomic Dog, says, My cardiologist told me about a 19-year-old girl that came into the ER with severe myocarditis after getting the COVID vaccine right after it became available.
	They were shocked. I never saw teenagers in my cardiologist's waiting room before 2021, but now I see them every visit.
	Coincidence? Oh yes, it's absolutely a coincidence.
	It has nothing to do with anything.
	Don't you know that? It's just so sad.
	And we've never seen this before.
	Like I said, you know, in the past, when they would rush these vaccines out and people would have reactions to it, they would pull back on it.
	And now they simply don't care.
	Well, we're going to take a break, and when we come back, I've got more than I want to talk about, especially this blame game.
	But what we are also, and they're still trying to do misdirection.
	The finger pointing has begun.
	But we're also seeing some other telltale signs in this.
	So we'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	Stay with us.
	Stay with us.
	Stay with us.
	Stay with us.
	Admiral Brett Grar, and I know I'm not pronouncing that right, But he was the guy who was the military head of Operation Warp Speed.
	He was the guy who was going to deliver all this stuff to everybody.
	He was doing logistics on it.
	And now he is pointing some fingers at other people.
	So I'm saying, if we could just wake people up a little bit more...
	We could get all these rats jumping off the ship and hopefully drowning.
	NIH, he says, is to blame for this stuff.
	And he said, the scientific community doesn't want to accept any blame for the pandemic.
	He said, I've been pretty open about assessing that this is much more likely to have come from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
	It's not my fault. He's the one who delivered the bioweapon to everybody, but don't blame him.
	The Chinese did it, and Fauci did it, and the NIH did it.
	Blame them. Is he calling for what?
	Is he calling for us to shut down gain-of-function research?
	Because, you know, they did call for that once upon a time, and Francis Collins and Fauci said, no, we're going to continue doing it.
	They continued doing it in North Carolina.
	They also continued to do it in foreign countries.
	That's why this all happened there.
	Nobody is calling for that to stop, including Senator Rand Paul, who is still pushing this blame China stuff and blame Fauci, blame China, blame Fauci, blame the NIH. This is a misdirection, folks.
	And I'll tell you why they're doing this.
	Because we're now seeing, and we've seen this before, as we saw with the different lots for Pfizer, as they tested them, I told you it's varied from 3 to 100, and I forget what the unit was.
	I think it was micrograms of active ingredients.
	But the bottom line was, whatever the unit was, it doesn't matter.
	It varied by a factor of 33.
	33. Why would you do that?
	Was that just an accident?
	I don't think it was an accident.
	Because the one thing that...
	They had the forms that went out in August.
	I got forms that was Philadelphia and another city and three states...
	And they sent out the information and said, here's what you're going to need to do to administer these things and what you're going to need to do to refrigerate this stuff and all the rest of that.
	And here's the information that we want you to collect on people.
	And I reported on it at the time.
	And that was in August.
	And then two months later, at that point, they'd sent it out to all the different states and all the different jurisdictions.
	And they had everybody reporting on this.
	And so... They said, you know, give this to anybody who's going to be administering the shot.
	And, of course, that was in October.
	They didn't start really vaccinating people until the end of December in the hospitals, and then, you know, it got broader in January.
	So all this stuff was being prepared.
	What did they have in there? Well, besides all the information about the personal information, you know, your name, address, your phone number, that type of stuff, they had two things that were suspicious.
	They also had the lot number, and they said, well, you know, we want to have the lot number because, you know, we need to know if there's a problem with the lot.
	It's like, okay, well, that's a reasonable thing.
	They had the date that you got the shot, so they could give you a reminder, they said.
	But then the really suspicious thing was they had a box there that said refused.
	I said, so, okay, so if they're saying they've got to get this because they want to see if there's some problems with the lot, and so they can remind you in 30 days to get a follow-up shot, which, again, we'd never seen that before.
	Why are they checking a box there for people who refused?
	Well, they're creating a database of refusenics.
	People who didn't go along with it.
	People who are pure bloods, right?
	And that's what your health professionals were going to be doing if you saw anybody.
	They were going to fill out a form and say that you'd refused it.
	So I thought that was very significant, and I talked about it.
	But the other part of this has now become even more significant, which is the only thing that they were tracking besides the date of vaccination was the lot number.
	And then people went back and found that these lots varied from anywhere from 3 to 100 in terms of the active ingredient.
	And then when, I think it was Naomi Wolf's group, when they went back and they looked at it, they found that almost all the injuries were from a few of the high dosage lots.
	And now we're seeing that a lot.
	Out of Germany, they're looking at this in particular.
	A couple of different universities.
	University of Leipzig and then another university in Bochum, I guess, if I'm pronouncing it correctly.
	A group of five German-speaking scientists are looking at this.
	And they said that these doses are so low that they're essentially placebos.
	And that, again, is indication that what they were doing was using everybody as lab rats.
	What would have normally happened if they'd gone through the three phases of testing?
	They would have exposed people on those tests to different doses, and they would expose people to placebos as well as a control group.
	And the doses is key.
	That's why I always say when I talk about fluoride, why would you dump something into the water?
	Because anything in too high of a dose can be harmful.
	You don't know what dose people are going to get if you just dump it into the water.
	Some people are going to get too much, some people are going to get too little.
	You're going to give the same dosage to a baby that you give to a 200-pound man?
	What's your problem? You don't medicate people through the water supply.
	That in and of itself is insane.
	Before we even start to talk about what we know about the effects of fluoride, the fact that you would try to give it to people, medicate people, through the water supply, where you can't control the dosage.
	And so in this particular case, these German scientists are publicly raising questions about the quality and the safety of the Pfizer vaccine.
	In Germany it's called the BioNTech.
	And they've broken this down into three groups.
	Travis, pull this up and show the chart there that's got the colored dots.
	And this is from the Daily Skeptic is where the original article is.
	The green batches clustered around the green line have a moderate or moderately high level of adverse events associated with them.
	They said, for example, take a look at Denmark.
	They said they had 800,000 doses administered.
	These 800,000 doses were associated with some 2,000 suspected adverse events.
	800,000, they have 2,000 events.
	Yeah, let me give you the headline here on this.
	Headline is, Pfizer batches in the EU were placebos.
	Look for placebo on the list.
	So, 800,000 doses in Denmark.
	And that's it. Scroll down to the chart that's there.
	That's the chart we want to see.
	So they've got three different cases there.
	They've got the yellow, the green, and the blue.
	And so they said they had in Denmark 800,000 doses, 2,000 suspected adverse events.
	So that's about one out of every 400 doses.
	They said that's not a small amount if we compare it to what we know otherwise from the influenza vaccine.
	But then when you start to take a look at these different groups by blue, here's the blue.
	That's almost a... A vertical line there, indicating that they've had a lot of adverse reactions.
	They said the blue batches represent less than 5% of the total number of doses.
	Nevertheless, they are associated with 50% of the 579 deaths recorded in the sample.
	Stop and think about this. You know, we stopped the vaccine when three people died, nine states banned it decades ago.
	Now, here just in Denmark, they won't stop it even after they have nearly 600 people die.
	And half of those deaths came from the blue batches that are there.
	And so then what is happening with the other colors?
	The green that is there, they said, has...
	The yellow batches, rather, are clustered around the yellow line.
	There's basically no adverse events with that.
	And then you've got the one that's in the middle.
	The yellow batches, by the way, represent about 30% of the total.
	They said those batches had 200,000 administered doses and zero adverse events.
	That's why they said, this looks like you had a, in some of your batches, you've got a placebo control group here.
	It was a lab test.
	Placebos, varying dosages, and you can see what is happening.
	And this is one of the other things that actually, not only is that part of it insidious, but it's one of the reasons why people say, no, I've had the shot, nothing happened to me, I didn't have any, nothing at all happened.
	Well, maybe you got the placebo, or what was effectively the placebo.
	I said from the very beginning, you're playing Russian roulette with this stuff.
	And every time you take a booster, It's like taking another shot without spinning the barrel.
	Another shot, and you're getting closer to actually getting the real stuff.
	But they are relentless about trying to misdirect people to the Wuhan lab.
	And I'm not saying that we should not shut down gain-of-function research.
	I think it's very dangerous.
	I think it's very reckless. A lot of people who are in the biomedical field have said the same thing.
	Many of them were furious when, after Congress told Francis Collins, who was running NIH and Fauci to shut this stuff down, when they found out they were still doing it, it was people in the scientific community that were even more furious about this.
	What's the point of this?
	And so it should be shut down.
	What I find interesting is that the people who are out there talking about it, this being a bioweapon engineered in Wuhan, they're not talking about shutting down gain of function.
	This is why I say this is just misdirection.
	They don't want any fundamental reform.
	They're looking to distract you from what they did with the vaccine, and they're looking to cover their behinds.
	That's all this is about.
	And so now you've got some Wuhan researchers, and the press is all over this.
	Oh, look, we've got whistleblowers out of Wuhan, out of the Wuhan lab.
	And they are saying that COVID was engineered as a bioweapon.
	Well, of course, if they say that, Then what that does is that also from the standpoint of China, it helps to get them off the hook because this is a U.S. taxpayer-funded lab as well.
	They're in China. And so now it's not just the Wu flu or the China flu.
	It is now something that is jointly owned by the U.S. government.
	And, of course, it protects the pharmaceutical industry.
	It protects all the politicians who created these bioweapons, the vaccines, and pushed that out.
	They've got you looking at something that was not a bioweapon so that you don't get angry about what they really did through the pharmaceutical people.
	That was where the bioweapon was created, and the politicians forced that on you.
	And China has got an incentive to lie about this as well.
	Don't trust anything that comes out of China.
	Don't trust anything that comes out of Washington, D.C. either.
	We'll be right back.
	The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	This is very damaging audio tape.
	We'd had the transcripts of it before, but we had not heard it.
	And when you hear it, and I played it yesterday, I'm not going to play it again for you.
	But when you hear it, it truly is amazing.
	And it blew away his previous excuse.
	I was just looking at articles and stuff.
	It wasn't anything real.
	No, you could hear what was going on.
	Now he's got a new defense.
	There was an interview with him, Semaphore and NBC. I got on a plane with him and they asked him questions about this after it was released.
	And he's got some even more absurd excuses for this.
	Oh, it was, I guess you'd say it's just bravado, he said.
	No, I would say it's more like Bravo Sierra.
	B.S. It's pure Bravo Sierra, not bravado.
	So, speaking with him before in ABC News, He said, I would say that it was bravado.
	If you want to know the truth, it was bravado.
	I was talking and just holding up papers and talking about them, but I had no documents.
	I didn't have any documents.
	Now, he had said that they were newspaper articles.
	Now he's just saying, oh, it's just holding up papers.
	I just held up a whole pile of, you know, my desk is loaded up with papers.
	I have papers from 25 different things, he said.
	And then in a Fox News interview earlier in the day, Fox News asked him about, well, why did you refer to these things as plans?
	Oh, well, I was talking about building plans and plans for golf courses.
	He's not even a good liar.
	It's just amazing to me that people follow this guy.
	Did I use the word plans?
	What I'm referring to is magazines, newspapers, plans of buildings.
	I had plans of buildings, you know.
	Building plans. Yeah, that's it.
	I had plans of a golf course.
	Yeah, that's right. And I was going to go over it with my wife, Morgan Fairchild.
	Remember that? John Lovett's the liar.
	Yeah, that's the ticket. He's just making this stuff up as he goes along.
	It's truly amazing.
	And then you look at the other side of this.
	Hunter. Hunter Biden.
	We got some new text messages from Hunter Biden.
	Actually, WhatsApp text messages that they got.
	He asked for $10 million from another Chinese Communist Party linked associate just days after demanding to be paid by an associate of a Chinese energy company, CEFC, in 2017.
	And another WhatsApp text.
	And you remember that WhatsApp text was pure mafia.
	I'm sitting here with the big guy, and we will be very displeased if you did not give us this money right away.
	You know what I mean? So I'm assured that you will be sending the said money right away, right?
	Because we would not want to disappoint the big guy that's right here next to me.
	And so Kevin Dong, what's the guy's name?
	Of course you would know that Hunter would look for somebody like that.
	$10 million in another WhatsApp text noting that the Biden family is, listen to this one, we're best at, quote, doing exactly what the chairman wants.
	Yeah. The chairman.
	We're talking about Chairman Mao?
	President Xi goes by the term president now, no longer chairman.
	No, they're talking about the chairman of this communist company.
	Because, you know, the Chinese communism is now fascism.
	They ally themselves with these crony capitalist companies.
	They have people running the government, these kleptocrats, which is what all communists are.
	They're thieves. But rather than, they're a little bit smarter, they're kind of like Hitler.
	You know, Hitler said Stalin was stupid because, you know, they both called themselves socialists, right?
	They were the Soviet socialists, and then the Nazis called themselves national socialists because they were nationalistic in their outlook, whereas the Russians said, well, no, we're against nationalism because we want a global government.
	You know, Hitler wanted a global government, but he's going to do it with a strong nationalism.
	Again, you know, it's just the lies that they tell you to get what they want.
	They're both after the same thing.
	They're both after complete totalitarian government and global government.
	But, you know, they have different ways to get there.
	Hitler would do it by building up his hyper-nationalism.
	And there's an element of hyper-nationalism with the communists as well.
	They remind me more of Hitler than they do of Stalin or Mao now in their organization.
	But they're thugs. They're gangsters.
	They're totalitarians. And so what Hitler said was, he said, Stalin is stupid.
	He's nationalizing and trying to run these companies.
	He doesn't know how to run these companies.
	I'm going to leave the people who know how to run the companies in charge until I get everything I want.
	And then I'll cut their throats and take over the business, right?
	And that's what the Chinese have done.
	You know, they let these people who know how to run the business, they let them run it, and then they take a cut of the money, you know, like a smart mafia figure would do.
	And it's kind of like protection money.
	Yeah, I'm protecting you here.
	From me. I'm protecting you from me.
	That money you're paying. So, anyway, the chairman.
	The chairman was the chairman of Yi Zhengming.
	So, anyway, Biden's family venture with the CEFC Corporation is best known for including a stake of, quote, 10 held by H for the big guy.
	That is shorthand is 10 million held by Hunter for the big guy, Joe.
	According to a 2017 email from Hunter Biden's laptop, in a message dated August 3rd, 2017, Hunter Biden told Kevin that he wanted to quit squabbling, quote, over peanuts, unquote, and settle on a firm deal by putting, quote, let's put this to bed tonight.
	And let's get to work. I'm tired of this, Kevin.
	I can make $5 million in any law firm in America.
	It's very simple.
	My $10 million per annum budget to use to further the interest of the JV, this move to $5 million is completely new to me.
	And it's not acceptable, obviously.
	If you think this is about money, it's not.
	The Bidens are the best I know at doing exactly what the chairman wants from this party.
	So let's not quibble over peanuts.
	So, yeah, they are as guilty as sin.
	And the Bidens are as guilty as sin about something that Americans really care about.
	Most Americans don't really care about, you know, the fact that Trump showed Iranian battle plans that were never executed to a bunch of his fans or five people who are writing biographies and stuff like that.
	They're not going to go run and tell it.
	To the Iranians, as I said yesterday, they're going to see the big board, right?
	People don't care about that.
	We know that the national security state is just overclassifying everything.
	But people really do care about it when they see this kind of thuggish mafia-type corruption.
	And they also care about the fact that they're prosecuting Trump to the full extent of the law.
	Trump did violate the law.
	It's just that simple.
	He committed felonies.
	Whether you agree with the law or not, he committed felonies.
	But he's getting prosecuted to the full extent.
	And then some on this stuff.
	Whereas the Bidens are covering up what they did.
	And the Department of Justice is covering up what the Bidens did.
	And the FBI is covering up what the Bidens and the Department of Justice did.
	So it's a massive cover-up besides the crimes.
	And these are crimes that people care about.
	The problem is that Trump isn't capable of acting like an adult.
	He's making these absurd excuses.
	Yeah, it was building plans.
	Yeah, that was it. And it was a bunch of bravado.
	There wasn't anything really there.
	Circular firing squad.
	So now you see that as part of the cover-up, Was Garland lying?
	This is a follow-up by Jonathan Turley, because as I read you the headline, the column that he had a few days ago, he said, so who's lying?
	Is it Merrick Garland or the whistleblowers?
	So he follows this up and he goes, well, now we know it's Merrick Garland.
	Even the New York Times is admitting it was Merrick Garland.
	They confirmed that Weiss was blocked.
	From bringing additional charges and from doing investigations and things like that.
	Turley said, I noted that it would not be a difficult question to answer who is lying, given the highly specific account of the whistleblowers of meetings, including the witnesses.
	And now one of the key whistleblowers is named names as well.
	He says, now the New York Times has confirmed one of the key allegations.
	While they buried the major fact in the 21st paragraph of the story, The New York Times did confirm that U.S. Attorney David Weiss did attempt to bring additional charges in California and in D.C., but was blocked.
	Many have observed that the placement of the disclosure in the Times is a classic example of burying the lead.
	If this were Bill Barr, the confirmation of the story would have been banner headlines.
	Instead, the confirmation is found in the baggage cars, 21 cars down the train.
	That is where you'll find this bombshell.
	Well, the New York Times writes, but in mid-2022, Mr.
	Weiss reached out to the top federal prosecutor in Washington, Matthew Graves, to ask his office to pursue charges and was rebuffed according to Mr.
	Shapely's testimony. A similar request to prosecutors in the Central District of California, etc., etc.
	And then they end with this.
	That episode was confirmed independently to the New York Times by a person with knowledge of the situation.
	Oh, that's big. As he points out, if the politics had been on the other side, that would have been what they started with.
	Garland stands contradicted in statements that he has made for months, including statements that he made just days ago.
	And so he says, what he said just days ago was, I don't know how it would be possible for anybody to block him from bringing a prosecution given that he has this authority.
	Well, Turley says, if Weiss was refused the ability to charge in two other jurisdictions, the question is whether he did, in fact, ask for special counsel status.
	If so, Garland could be facing serious consequences, even an impeachment effort.
	What is clear is that Congress now has ample basis to pursue these answers fully and aggressively.
	With both potential criminal and impeachable questions, the authority of Congress is at its apex in using subpoenas to get to the bottom of this scandal.
	But will they? You know, we see what Merrick Garland is doing, criminal exposure that he's got.
	We see the criminal exposure of what Biden's been doing, and of course everybody knew this, but then it got more and more evidence of it with the laptops and all the rest of this stuff.
	We've got recordings on Trump.
	Again, lock them all up.
	But as this is all happening, what they're doing is they're arranging themselves into a circular firing squad in Washington, D.C. And again, Trump saying it was bravado.
	But what about the...
	Illegally leaked audio.
	You see? This is why I say it's Circular Firing Squad.
	Yes, very damaging, very incriminating.
	And now you've got Trump doubling down and lying about stuff.
	But of course, he's not under oath.
	So this isn't perjury yet.
	But, you know, just wait. But they put this audio out there.
	It's very damaging to Trump.
	But it's also damaging to them.
	That's why I say it's a Circular Firing Squad.
	Who leaked this stuff?
	They've committed a crime by leaking this stuff.
	And so we're in a situation now where our government has gotten so corrupt, people are not afraid, like the Biden administration, to openly commit crimes because they know in this highly politicized environment that nothing's going to happen to them.
	They got their people, the Department of Justice, their Attorney General, the FBI are going to cover for them.
	So they can do whatever they want. They can leak anything.
	They can commit any kind of a crime.
	You know, they can double down on this stuff, which is, you know, what Watergate was about.
	We've got some stuff here and we've got a burglary.
	Now I'm going to cover that up and I'm going to lie about that and all the rest of this stuff.
	That's what these guys are doing now.
	The Democrats are doing that.
	And they know they can get away with it because everything is so corrupt.
	And the only person who's going to stop any of this stuff would be Kevin McCarthy.
	Do you think he's got the backbone to do that?
	No. They know he doesn't have the backbone to do it as well.
	So again, Trump. I would say it was bravado.
	If you want to know the truth, it was bravado.
	New potential legal argument from the former president, says Semaphore.
	Yeah, that's right. Why didn't he ever say this before?
	There's a new argument. I was just bragging about it, you know.
	Didn't have anything. There was articles that he was overselling the material that he was showing to the aid and to people working on a biography of Mark Meadows.
	Yeah, I just held up a whole pile of my desk.
	It's loaded with papers. I got papers.
	25 different things, he said.
	At one point he gestured to the seat next to him on the plane.
	These are the people who actually interviewed him on the plane.
	Where there was a stack of various papers that he had set there, deliberately for this purpose, I guess.
	Newspapers, copies of his speech, printouts of articles.
	He grabbed some of the pile, he placed them in front of him, moving them around as he spoke, offering up a physical reenactment of what he said had occurred on the audio tape.
	And then they asked him about the words plans in a Fox News thing.
	Oh, plans? I have plans of buildings.
	Yeah, that's it. You know, building plans.
	I had plans of a golf course.
	On the plane asked if he'd had any regrets about his handling of classified documents.
	He said, no, no, I have no regrets.
	I didn't have a classified document.
	There was no classified document on my desk.
	Why was it that he said, see, I could have classified.
	This is top six. I could have declassified this, but now I can't.
	Oh, that's a problem. Yeah, that's a problem, isn't it?
	Asked whether the audio would affect whether he considers a plea deal.
	Trump said that he was confident that the government's use of the Espionage Act to prosecute him would fail.
	And he repeated unverified accusations against Biden before ending the interview.
	He said, frankly, that you even ask a question like that is a disgrace.
	So let's end this right now.
	Ask me no questions.
	I'll tell you no lies.
	But again, why isn't this very damaging tape?
	Why is that not drawing charges?
	This is an article from Zero Hedge.
	The attorney for Donald Trump slammed the Justice Department for leaking this tape to CNN. Here's the good news.
	She said, we know who leaked it, and that's the Department of Justice, because I didn't have it.
	Only the Department of Justice did.
	They keep everything close to their chest until they realize they're losing.
	So then they leak something and tell the American people, listen to what he said, said his attorney Alina Habba.
	Well, let's think about what he said.
	He said what the Presidential Record Act says, that the president has a right to declassify documents.
	Who doesn't? A non-president.
	And so his lawyer pivots this over to Biden.
	But that doesn't really save Trump with this.
	You see, he said, I could have declassified this.
	That's right. He did say that.
	As president, I could have declassified this.
	But then he also immediately follows up, which is what she left out, which is why when they put you on the stand, they say, we told the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
	And Trump's lawyer is not telling you the whole truth because he immediately follows that up.
	I could have declassified this, but then I didn't.
	I didn't. And now that's a bit of a problem.
	Because now I've got these documents.
	Yeah. So she didn't tell you the whole truth about that.
	But then she spins over to Joe Biden.
	As a senator like Joe Biden, when he had classified documents and took them out 40 years ago, 30 years ago, he had no right to do that.
	Meanwhile, the classified documents in question regarding the Iran plans...
	We're not among the charges levied against Trump by Special Counsel Jack Smith.
	So why is that the case?
	Again, is he hanging on to that to charge Trump with that separately?
	To be tried on this in a New Jersey jurisdiction?
	And then something else happened yesterday in this District of Corruption and Criminals.
	They had Rudy Giuliani.
	Did a voluntary interview with Jack Smith's team.
	And everybody's like, is he going to rat us out?
	Well, if you're telling the truth, what's to rat out, right?
	Oh no! Oh no, what's he going to tell people?
	This, they said, is about January the 6th.
	And this is where they're now pivoting.
	Watergate lawyer Nick Ackerman, speaking to MSNBC, Was asked about the implications of the fact that he proffered an interview with Smith.
	Ackerman said Giuliani was smack dab in the middle of everything with January the 6th.
	If he comes totally clean here, Trump is in big trouble.
	John Eastman is in big trouble right down the line.
	Possibly General Flynn, Roger Stone, Steve Bannon, he said.
	He said, anybody who is in place in that Willard Hotel war room.
	We know a lot of people.
	I know some people who are there.
	And what was going on there?
	And what was the connection between people in that war room and the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers?
	And this is why they came after this novel charge, you know, of the insurrection thing that they got against the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, because they want to run that charge against Trump.
	And they're going to...
	Those railroaded convictions for that were preparation for them coming after Trump on January 6th.
	So that looks like where that's going to be headed as well.
	Before we go to break, Rockville and Guard Goldsmith.
	Hey, Guard. Thank you for the tip.
	It says, David, my friend and mentor on writing, lost his wife on turbo cancer shortly after they got the jab.
	I'm so sorry. Then a few months later, he had a stroke.
	A young lady down our country road, massive headache, then permanent loss of sight and one eye after the jab.
	A friend's dad, two strokes, another friend, heart troubles, ocular stroke.
	Thank you for caring greatly and keeping the information signal strong.
	Well, you know, just like you, Gard, I cannot not care about this stuff.
	I mean, it is. And again, Gard every night on Rockfin, Liberty Conspiracy, you can find them at 7 o'clock Eastern.
	It's just horrific. And to all this suffering, misery, and death, You add the injustice.
	The fact that these people are getting away with it.
	We just ask, how long, Lord, will this go on?
	We know that they will eventually answer for these crimes.
	But we'd like to see it happen in this life.
	On Rock Fan Eric, thank you very much for that tip.
	I appreciate that very much.
	We are... Right at about 7.8 now, just a little bit above 7.8.
	And thank you so much to everybody, the money bomb that was brought about by Richard and by Supra Faye last Thursday and Friday.
	Appreciate that. That really made a very big difference.
	We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	It's hard to tell, but he's clearly losing the war in Iraq.
	He's losing the war at home.
	And he has become a bit of a briar around the world.
	It's not just NATO. It's not just the European Union.
	It's Japan. It's, you know, it's 48.
	Oh, boy. That was kind of interesting.
	For a couple of different reasons.
	As a matter of fact, in twice in 24 hours in two different places, Biden is still in his mind...
	Fighting the Iraq War, and he thinks that Putin is losing it.
	Biden is losing it, I think.
	And, as you saw, and we'll play that again so you can see it, on the side of his face, both sides of his face, has a pretty wide indentation.
	From something that he was wearing on his face.
	A lot of questions coming up about that.
	Again, twice in the same day, he says Putin is losing in Iraq.
	He doesn't even know.
	And why would we care?
	We don't care what country it is.
	They're just interchangeable.
	Over there, over there.
	Send the troops, send the planes over there.
	Because the military-industrial complex needs some money.
	It was at a fundraiser in Chevy Chase on a Tuesday night that he confused Ukraine with Iraq.
	Of course, Chevy Chase.
	Not the Saturday Night Live Chevy Chase.
	But it was like a Saturday Night Live skit.
	Look, I said this before when Biden started talking about a dark winter.
	I said that he's suffering from senility, obviously.
	And I said, he's speaking off the cuff like that when he talks about dark winter.
	I said, when he had full mental facilities, that was when, as a senator, he was one of the key people pushing this dark winter stuff back in 2001.
	And I'm sure that was very much on his mind.
	And I'm sure that he knows that this is dark winter that's being implemented.
	And so he's, you know, just like when he's thinking about a war, his mind was fixed on Iraq.
	He's been talking about Iraq so much.
	Well, he talked a lot about Dark Winter.
	He knows exactly how this whole thing was a germ game, planned, and run forever and ever.
	And, you know, I still am convinced that he had this senile Freudian slip talking about Dark Winter.
	That was what that was about. But anyway, he said at that fundraiser in Chevy Chase, Maryland, If anybody told you, and my staff wasn't so sure either, that we'd be able to bring all of Europe together and the onslaught on Iraq and get NATO to be completely united, I think they would have told you it's not likely.
	The one thing Putin counted on was being able to split NATO. So...
	I guess his staff has got him sat down now and said, Mr.
	President, let's repeat this.
	Where are we now? We're in Ukraine.
	Ukraine. Can you say Ukraine? You know, where Hunter was getting all this money and everything.
	You remember that? Fix your mind on Ukraine.
	And then what you see on his face, let me just play this again.
	It's a short clip. This time, if you're looking at this, look at his face.
	It's hard to tell, but he's clearly losing the war.
	He's under his ear. Great line going across his ear.
	He has become a bit of a fly around the world.
	Maybe about an inch wide, a little bit more than that.
	It's not just NATO. It's not just the Eastern Union.
	So, even Matt Drudge put that up at the top of the drug.
	What is this on his face?
	And then they put up their CNN explanation.
	Well, he's begun using CPAP machine for his sleep apnea.
	He's making these statements in the middle of the day.
	So he was sleeping the rest of the day, I guess.
	And this is something that I'm having to do now as I'm staying up for such late hours and only getting about four or five hours of sleep.
	I got to take a nap in the afternoon.
	But fortunately, I don't have to wear a strap.
	But people are asking what this is about.
	He was clearly having to take a nap in the afternoon, and he still had his CPAP stuff there, but never seen that before.
	That's still kind of interesting. More Democrats would consider a third-party presidential candidate, says the poll.
	Oh, well, was that open the way for RFK Jr.?
	No, no, of course not.
	And here's why. Even if he didn't want to ally himself with his beloved Democrat party, there's no way that he could get on the ballot.
	It's almost impossible to get on the ballot as a third-party candidate or as an independent.
	So forget about anything seriously happening with that, even though some people, you know, NBC is pushing this idea.
	It just underscores how dissatisfied everybody is with the candidates.
	But of the people who are going to be making the decisions, you still have these two lockdown poisoners-in-chiefs Trump and Biden are leading.
	There was a health policy roundtable discussion on Tuesday.
	With RFK Jr., and a lot of people whose names are very familiar.
	You've got Dr. Pierre Corey, Mickey Willis, who did the Plandemic series, Dr.
	McCullough, Dr.
	Sherry Tenpenny, Del Bigtree.
	And so they're talking about policies that could be implemented if RFK Jr.
	were president. And I think this is worth talking about.
	You know, whether or not it happens, I don't expect to see him get elected because, as I said, I think that he is on the outside.
	I think he's got a really good chance if it was an honest election, but I don't believe it's an honest election.
	Since I think the CIA runs everything, I think they'll make sure that he doesn't get elected one way or the other.
	This is the moment when collapsing center, the disintegrating center, this functional health system finally opens up And what has so long been alternative, quote-unquote, might now become a new mainstream that could transform the health of this country, said one of the participants who was facilitating it, Charles Eisenstein.
	And so Kennedy talked about Big Pharma's mercantile ambitions, quote-unquote, said they've been allowed to overwhelm the health care system and conflicts of interest, And so when he's talking about conflicts of interest, he said, here's what we need to think about.
	We need to end advertising by pharma.
	That is such an obvious solution, and I'm glad to hear somebody saying it.
	All this Ask Your Doctor commercial stuff, that's got to stop.
	This is how they own CNN and Fox News and MSNBC and ABC, NBC, CBS. They own the news media because they are such big advertisers with them.
	And, you know, they are always...
	Every one of these news organizations.
	And it's not just Pfizer.
	When you look at it, it's every one of these news organizations.
	And so that's how they capture the news media.
	And as I've said before, we stopped watching news when we moved to the woods in North Carolina.
	And then we took a vacation.
	We, you know, flip on the TV and the hotel room.
	And it's one Ask Your Doctor commercial.
	I've never seen anything like this.
	And look at how many of them there are.
	And they completely owned everybody.
	Just like that, you know, when Tucker Carlson wanted to leave Fox News, you know, he says, well, imagine if we had told you, you know, that you had to get the MyPillow stuff and you had to get booster pillows and all the rest of this stuff.
	And he was talking about the vaccine.
	It's pretty clear. He got kind of nervous about it.
	Oh, but we didn't do that with a vaccine at Fox News.
	Oh, yes, you did. And you knowingly complied with it.
	And see, they can get Tucker and they can get everybody at Fox News.
	Because that's how Tucker gets his $25 million a year, by shilling for big pharmaceutical companies.
	So you've got to end the advertising by pharmaceutical companies, and he's absolutely right about that.
	He's also right about this, all these things that he said.
	Redirecting grants towards studying chronic diseases.
	Making public health data, such as the Vaccine Safety Data Link, make that available to researchers.
	And having the U.S. Department of Justice hold journals accountable for racketeering with the pharmaceutical industry to systematically lie to the public.
	Spot on. Spot on.
	It's good to have this discussion there.
	As I said, there's a A lot of different issues, and he's got a general vision of government that is big government.
	RFK Jr.'s vision of government is big traditional Democrat vision of government, and that's what I have a big problem with.
	But he also, at the last minute, I don't know why he did, he pulled out of a Moms for Liberty summit and did that at the last minute.
	I said the group's co-founder, Tiffany Justice, He said that even though the Kennedy camp confirmed his appearance a week ago and that Moms for Liberty had hyped up his appearance, Kennedy informed the influential group of conservative mothers that, quote, his schedule changed and he can no longer speak.
	And the same thing happened with me.
	All of his people said he was going to come on and talk about his book because I agree 100% with him.
	On his Fauci book.
	And I especially wanted to talk to him about the chapter on germ games, which I thought was excellent.
	But he canceled at the last minute, and then we said, okay, well, let's reschedule.
	No, I don't think we can reschedule.
	So what's up with that?
	Who knows? Maybe he'll get so desperate that he'll come on the show.
	I don't know. I haven't been complimentary of him because I'm not going to suck up to anybody to get an interview.
	And I would ask him some tough questions, but again...
	When you look at this, there's a lot of issues that are key issues that have been key issues for a very long time, which I would absolutely disagree with him on.
	Abortion, other things like that.
	But there's a lot of key issues that he talks about that nobody else is talking about.
	And he's right on those issues.
	So far, he has been able to talk about what he wants to talk about and not talk about what he doesn't want to talk about.
	And that's helped him a great deal.
	But I don't think the elections are honest anyway.
	But it is important for us to have these conversations, to understand where these people are coming from, and to know that we need to protect ourselves and protect ourselves at the local level.
	We'll be right back. Music.
	In a world of deceit,
	Telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Let's talk a little bit about what is happening in Ukraine.
	And, of course, when we look at Zelensky, it's almost become comical.
	You would think that the guy was a comedian.
	Oh, that's right, he was a comedian.
	Except he's playing this one straight.
	What he's saying is there's not going to be any elections in Ukraine until the war is over.
	But we're there for democracy.
	We're there for liberty and all the rest of this stuff, right?
	Now, he told the BBC that there'll be no Ukrainian presidential election in 2024 if martial law is still in effect.
	So, you know, one, two, three, what are we fighting for?
	Don't ask me. I don't know.
	He could at least pretend that he's going to have an honest election, and then he could rig it.
	That's the way we do it in America.
	Come on, you're not even trying.
	He's just going to shut it down.
	And then he offers this Trumpian excuse.
	Totally ridiculous excuse.
	Just as ridiculous as, well, it was pure bravado.
	Well, this is pure bravado.
	He says, if we have martial law, we can't have elections.
	The Constitution prohibits any elections during martial law.
	What is the obvious problem with this statement?
	Well, by having martial law, that means that you've suspended the Constitution.
	So the Constitution isn't prohibiting elections during martial law.
	If you've got martial law, you're not even paying attention to the Constitution.
	So by definition, that doesn't apply.
	Yeah, see, this guy's still a comedian.
	Except he's not funny.
	Of course, he never was funny.
	He was a disgusting pervert.
	That's what he did for laughs.
	But, yeah, it's easy to get laughs with that, isn't it?
	You get out and you get a potty mouth and you do sexual jokes and stuff like that like you did.
	And you can always get a laugh because people laugh uncomfortably at pushing the envelope like that.
	But it was never clever comedy.
	And this is not a clever excuse for not having elections.
	Again, you know, he's not even trying.
	Can't he talk to the CIA? They did a coup there.
	Can't he talk to them about how to rig the election and make it look like it's honest?
	He added that if elections happened, this is actually the Speaker of the Ukrainian Parliament added this to what Zelensky said.
	Added that if elections happen, it could lead to the rupture of the state.
	Which our enemy is waiting for.
	Wait a minute. So he's saying then that the Ukrainian state is antithetical to elections?
	It's antithetical to democracy?
	Again, why are we there? Ukrainian legislation stipulates that it is impossible to hold any elections during martial law.
	Well, no legislation, no constitution applies if you have martial law.
	That's what it means by definition.
	But he says, and this makes sense.
	Zelensky has banned opposition parties and media.
	He has raided Orthodox churches.
	He's now effectively canceled the election.
	But we're there to defend democracy, says Max Blumenthal.
	Says Biden, actually.
	And then he moves on as part of his religious consolidation.
	He moves to cancel traditional Christmas.
	Now he's becoming the Grinch here.
	But they will still have Christmas.
	They will just celebrate it on December the 25th instead of January the 7th because the Russian Orthodox Church has it on December 25th.
	I'm sorry, the Russian Orthodox have it on January the 7th.
	The Ukrainian Orthodox Church puts it at December 25th.
	Currently, both dates are considered to be official holidays.
	However, Zelensky's new bill, they got a law to declare when Christmas is going to be, So evidently, they're still doing bills under martial law.
	And we're going to have a martial Christmas.
	It now has to be approved by the Ukrainian Parliament.
	Seeks to amend Ukraine's labor code and limit the Christmas holiday to December the 25th.
	The purpose of the draft law is to abandon the Russian heritage of imposing the celebration of Christmas on January the 7th, said the note.
	See, this is just a small example of why you want to keep the government out of religion.
	Because it hijacks it for its own purposes.
	And what's its purpose in this?
	Well, of course, they will use this To anybody who's going to be celebrating on the Russian Orthodox Day of January 7th, they will then use that as a means to identify their enemies, the enemies of Zelensky.
	It is obvious that a conflict is being provoked between believers who want to live according to the old calendar and the other one.
	Well, said a source of the Russian Orthodox Church, that's exactly what these politicians do when they make this alliance with the churches over this.
	There is a fierce congressional debate, meanwhile, over whether or not tactical nuke attack on a NATO country would trigger NATO Article 5.
	And this is a group of Republicans who, as you saw, Lindsey Graham and was it Blumenthal, I think, they were talking about, well, we've got to address this nuclear thing.
	We've got to make sure that we're going to respond to the nuclear attack by Putin that he's pushing right here.
	So I want him to know we're going to go nuclear.
	So you had a group of Republicans.
	Rand Paul was leading in the Senate.
	In the House, you had Chip Roy and Warren Davidson.
	Saying they would reaffirm NATO's Article 5 does not override congressional war power.
	Does not override it, especially for the nuclear stuff.
	NATO's Article 5 outlines mutual defense commitments of the 31-member alliance, but does not automatically mean that the U.S. must intervene militarily if NATO ally comes under attack.
	Paul said, for decades, many legislators have incorrectly interpreted Article 5 of NATO as an obligation that unquestionably commits the U.S. to provide military support should a NATO ally be attacked.
	And what it says is it talks about, to quote it, and I've got the whole thing here, I'm only going to read a part of it to you, but the relevant part says, the parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against all, right?
	Where we go one, we go all.
	Anyway, they said, here's the relevant part.
	We'll assist the party or parties so attacked By taking forthwith, individually and in concert with other parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force.
	But it doesn't mandate that.
	It says we will deem what is necessary, but there's no requirement for it.
	Furthermore, Rand Paul noted that military action is not mandated.
	He says, furthermore, Article 11, that was Article 5, Article 11 of the NATO Treaty says that the provisions of the treaty are to be carried out in accordance with each country's respective constitutional processes.
	So whatever you're going to do to respond, yes, you have an obligation.
	You've agreed that you're going to help us if something happens.
	But what you deem to be necessary, if that includes the use of force, that's going to be done in accordance with the country's respective constitutional processes.
	However, you had Lindsey Graham and other senators having the press conference that I've played for you in the past, where they basically, you know, push and even push for nuclear response.
	The legislation that Paul introduced would express that Article 5 does not, quote, supersede the constitutional requirement that Congress declare war or authorize the use of military force prior to the U.S. engaging in hostilities.
	The bill was co-sponsored in the Senate by Mike Braun, Mike Lee, Cynthia Loomis, and Josh Hawley.
	And the House Article 5 legislation was co-sponsored by Dan Bishop, Troy Neils, Harriet Hagman, Paul Gozar, Andy Biggs, Andrew Clyde, Matt Rosendale, and Marjorie Taylor Greene.
	So you can thank them, send them a note, and thank them for doing the right thing.
	I try to shore them up to continue to push back against this legislation.
	Meanwhile, as they're trying to push us into a nuclear war, if we take a look, there was an article on Freethought Project.
	Talking about this Ukrainian kill list.
	I've talked about this in the past.
	And, of course, this is... The Ukrainians put together this kill list.
	And they had, you know, like Alexander...
	What's his name?
	The Russian guy.
	I've interviewed him. I can't even remember his name.
	His daughter, Daria, who was killed.
	They assassinated her and crossed her, put an X on her face.
	And so you should take this thing seriously.
	Dugan, Alexander Dugan.
	You should take this seriously.
	And there was a link in this story to the blacklist.
	I took a look at it, and it's kind of interesting, the people that are on it.
	You got Glenn Greenwald, Tucker Carlson, Roger Waters of Pink Floyd, Steven Seagal, the actor, You have Rand Paul is there.
	Colonel Douglas McGregor, who is retired, he was there as well.
	Tulsi Gabbard, chem.com.
	A lot of people that they don't like because they've spoken out against this, our participation, our escalation, our continuation of the Ukrainian war.
	The guy who wrote this article that's on Freethought Project, David Miller, he said, late last year my name was added to the blacklist, published online by the Ukraine Center for Countering Disinformation.
	Again, some of the other people there, Ray McGovern, Scott Ritter.
	He said, what was my crime?
	It said that my pro-Russian narrative was claiming that NATO's proxy war with Russia is taking place in Ukraine.
	Well, of course, that's absolutely right.
	But he says, it's kind of interesting because I was accused of being anti-Semitic over a decade ago.
	And he said, of course I'm not, but he said, that caused me not to back off, but I intensified my research and my writing activities about these organizations that were involved in defaming me.
	You know, just like Elon Musk of the Anti-Defamation League said, just get rid of the anti.
	It's the Defamation League.
	They've got an agenda, just like these Ukrainians have an agenda.
	And since then, I've produced a long catalog of work on the Zionist movement as well as on Western propaganda activities.
	But the issue of Nazism in Ukraine will be seen in retrospect as a defining issue of our era.
	I mean, people are literally Nazis, as we've talked about.
	You know, they don't even try to hide it.
	They're putting Nazi insignias on their uniforms.
	Hans, are we the bad guys?
	On their tanks, all the rest of this stuff.
	They're honoring former Nazi people during World War II. They're naming places and streets after them.
	I mean, they literally are Nazis.
	The Azov Battalion, all the rest of them.
	It's important, and we're on their side.
	It's important, he said, to remember that the reason that I and many others are threatened by the Ukraine government and their NATO backers is because we, in turn, threaten to expose them for what they are.
	Literal Nazi collaborators.
	He said he had written this piece in an article that was titled How Disinformation Works, Western Intelligence Agency's global war on the left, and it contained a single 176-word paragraph on Ukraine titled Russian Disinformation or Ukrainian Lies.
	It recounted several examples of Ukrainian misinformation, concluded that anyone who mentions any particular truth is derided for echoing Putin's talking points.
	I was actually denounced as an information terrorist who might be guilty of war crimes.
	Except these are the people who are assassinating me.
	So he talks about the fact, you know, when he was labeled anti-Semitic, he started doing investigations.
	And so he said, bottom line is, by putting me on this kill list, I started investigating where this is coming from.
	He says, it turns out, the covert kill list website is a product of the Ukraine regime, but it is funded by the CIA. And it's a website that is hosted by NATO. He said, and this is kind of interesting because, you know, you see that these organizations are not monolithic, right?
	There's, you know, there's internal divisions and even fighting within the CIA and all these other organizations as well.
	And as an example of this, he says at the same time that the NATO think tank The Atlantic Council boasts that Henry Kissinger is on its board of directors.
	At the same time, NATO also hosts a kill list website on which Kissinger appears.
	So he says, but let's start with this kill list website itself.
	And he went back and he found that the domain name was registered 14th of August 2014 as part of their coup that they did.
	Six months after the U.S. maiden coup that overthrew the democratically elected government of Viktor Yanukovych.
	Now they're not going to have any more elections, right?
	Other similar domain names, he said, were later logged by the group, and he's got five more that were all done around that time, you know, within a year or so of that.
	He said there were also mirror sites, but he says there's three people associated with all these domains that were done at about the same time, and they provide the clues, and this is how he traced it all back, and I'm not going to go into all the detail about how he traced it back to the CIA, but you can read the article if you want on Freethought Project.
	But what I thought was interesting was the fact that they've got this kill list, and it's on a NATO website, and it is funded by the CIA. And it was actually Daria Dugin in Moscow was one of the ones who was, you know, when they killed her as an obvious assassination, they put an X on her face and put liquidated there.
	So this is something that's pretty serious.
	And this is what our government wants.
	The CIA is always doing.
	That's why I said they've got a lot of different ways that they can slice this thing to make sure they get the kind of results that they want out of this election.
	We'll be right back. Decoding
	the mainstream propaganda.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	Well, I'm sure you've seen this now.
	There's been a lot of talk about the fact that we've got several people who have contracted malaria inside the United States.
	They didn't contract it and then come back to America.
	That happens often enough.
	But this is something, these people had not traveled outside of the United States, and yet they still contracted malaria.
	They've got four cases of it.
	This is the first time since 2003, I think it was, that there's been internally, you know, there's a group of kids who got malaria.
	They didn't really understand how.
	But it didn't evolve into a big issue.
	But a lot of people have pointed out that these two cases were in two places where, Bill Gates had released his mosquitoes.
	He loves mosquitoes, doesn't he?
	He released them once in a presentation that he was getting, talking about how he could vaccinate people with mosquitoes, and he released a whole bunch of them into the audience.
	Liz Churchill writes, it must be a coincidence that from 2003 till 2023, there wasn't one case of malaria spread by mosquitoes inside the United States.
	And then along comes a company funded by Bill Gates to solve a problem that didn't exist, And suddenly, in the exact places where he releases mosquitoes, there's an outbreak of malaria.
	Wall Street Silver says, number one, Bill Gates' company released billions of mosquitoes in Florida and Texas.
	Malaria, number two, is now in Florida and Texas for the first time in 20 years.
	Number three, Bill Gates has a malaria vaccine almost ready.
	Oh, isn't that nice?
	Just a coincidence, isn't it?
	I would say the coincidence theorists.
	And then they also point out hydroxychloroquine as an anti-malarial drug as well.
	No vax is needed.
	I guess that's another reason why they had to try to...
	Tap that down. By the way, we're talking about hydroxychloroquine makes me think of ivermectin.
	There was an article I saw on vaccineimpact.com warning people that ivermectin is dangerous for pregnant women.
	So even though it's been around for many decades and I know what the safety profile of it is, and it's pretty safe, it's not safe for pregnant women.
	That's one thing we know about it because it's been around for so long.
	I had a listener who caught what I was saying about diesel engines and how they were applying a very harsh standard to engineers from Audi, from VW, and how bizarre this was and how this has gone on for such a long time.
	Massive fines coming after them far more than they would come after Takata, which had about 17 or so people who died from We're good to
	go. Europe had very good diesel engines in their cars, and in order to prevent any more imports, California reduced the allowable particulate emissions for diesel combustion engines to be very low amounts.
	This kept European diesel imports out and was adopted for the rest of the country.
	I absolutely agree about that.
	And, of course, there's multiple things that happen with this, and this is from Chuck, so thank you, Chuck, for this, and I'll read the rest of what he has to say.
	I remember in the 80s, We had a diesel car.
	We didn't want to spend the money, didn't have the money to buy a Mercedes.
	I guess we could have gotten a used one.
	At the time, every Mercedes was a diesel in their entire product lineup.
	Every one of them was a diesel, except for the two-seater sports car and the high-end luxury limo.
	But everything else was a diesel.
	And after a few years of these regulations and everything, they basically pretty much stopped with diesel.
	They still sell some diesels and they've got very complicated cleaning stuff on them, which makes it complicated, makes it expensive, even more expensive to own and that type of thing.
	But at the time when that happened, and that was in the wake of the big disruptions that we'd had with the Arab oil embargo and all the rest of this stuff, And so people were looking at the fact that diesel was a quite a bit cheaper fuel at the time because the federal government had not added additional surcharges to it to make the fuel expensive.
	Again, their war against diesel, first and foremost.
	But at the time, diesel was cheaper than regular fuel, and the diesels got much better fuel economy than the gasoline engines did.
	And so that was a big selling point for them.
	But we wound up getting a French car that had a diesel engine.
	I know, I know you're laughing.
	But it had a really good engine in it.
	It's just everything else in it was garbage.
	Everything else in it was total garbage.
	Especially the electronics.
	But just body integrity, it was falling apart with everything.
	We bought it new and it was awful.
	But the diesel engine part of it was good.
	And I remember at the time...
	General Motors tried to come out with diesels and tried to mimic it, and that's what Chuck is talking about here.
	They were not able to get it done.
	They had all kinds of reliability problems with their diesel engines because They didn't design them specifically as a diesel engine.
	You have these very high compression and pressures and things like that.
	They just tried to convert it over from a gasoline engine block, and they were having all kinds of problems with that.
	And it's pretty obvious.
	You pop open the hood. It's just a jerry-rigged gasoline engine that they were turning into a diesel engine.
	It was kind of comical.
	You know, the One that we had, and I think the Mercedes did the same way, it had a gigantic battery because it takes a lot of juice to crank these things initially.
	Because I had a really big battery.
	What they did with the GM, they just took standard batteries and put two of them in and wired them up, two batteries in it.
	And so it was pretty obvious that they were just trying to repurpose off-the-shelf components from gasoline engines into a diesel thing.
	And it gave them a real black eye.
	So they couldn't compete against it, and so they came after it from a regulatory standpoint.
	He's exactly right. But of course, you know, they always use the emission stuff as a beard for what they want to do, and there's always these crony capitalist issues there.
	But, you know, by the time they got to this scandal, it had gotten to the point where Volkswagen was doing these diesel engines, doing, you know, they had, by that time, they'd already made now diesel instead of being cheaper than regular fuel, now more expensive than premium fuel.
	And they were getting even better in terms of their mileage.
	And so for all those reasons, they had to shut them down.
	Shut them down because they were in competition to Detroit.
	Shut them down because they don't want people having cars that get tremendously good fuel economy.
	And the other part of it is when you make the diesel engines able to withstand these special, these high compression ratios and things like that.
	It also makes them more durable.
	They're going to last for a very long time.
	It's a simpler engine, and with that heavy block, it's going to last for a long time.
	And they don't want these cars around.
	They want the cars to go away.
	And everything they're doing is to make all the cars go away.
	Anyway, he says, along came the nitrogen oxide limits, the NOx limits for diesels, and an on cost of 100 euros.
	For a Urea water AdBlue system.
	This is what Audi and VW sidestepped.
	I worked for another OEM and the exhaust engineers were accused of stealing money from the chief engineer's pocket.
	Because they insisted that they needed the AdBlue urea process.
	It was nasty. The boss pointed to Audi VW. They didn't have such a system.
	Audi VW had a sensor to change the air-to-fuel ratio to run very lean if a monitor was hooked up to the engine.
	In the end, the exhaust engineers were vindicated.
	Fiat also was caught with a lean burn trick, but that didn't make U.S. news.
	So he says, if the government doesn't give an OEM the green light to sell a vehicle, you aren't going to make any money.
	It's just that simple. And in the 80s, he said, I was in Detroit and Reagan doubled the tax on imports one year to make the U.S. cars more competitive.
	I felt that it was a pity that Detroit didn't want to compete head-to-head, but used a higher import tax instead.
	Yeah, that's exactly where we are.
	And the essence of all this stuff is crony capitalism.
	All this green stuff.
	It's crony capitalism. It's all redistribution of income.
	The Paris Climate Accord.
	Redistribution of income from the United States and Europe, Western countries, to India and China.
	Because they're giving a pass on all that stuff.
	You want to tell us this is global warming and you don't have a global solution for everybody?
	You're going to let the two largest population countries skip all this stuff?
	No. Meanwhile, VW is not doing too well.
	After they got the message and they went to EV stuff...
	Because the government says you're going to make it the way we tell you to make it, or you're not going to make it at all.
	Well, they're not making it too well with EV because there is no demand for it.
	This is a suicidal industry.
	These people are looking at this, and even as you look at the efforts being made, the feeble efforts, I would say, being made by Ferrari, being made by Porsche, Won't you please let us recapture carbon dioxide and turn it into a fuel that we can burn, even if we, you know, put windmills down the tip of South America so we don't, you know, it's all sustainable and all the rest of the stuff, and it's going to be who knows how expensive for that fuel, if they can make enough of it.
	You know, they're begging to get some kind of a carve-out for this.
	See, people won't stand up and fight, and of course these corporations won't.
	It doesn't make any sense for them to do that.
	But they're not going to make any...
	The point is that everybody knows that they don't want cars sold for private usage.
	And that's why Ford is rebranding itself as a mobility company.
	They want to be able to rent you the car, rent you the car, buy the ride.
	So the industry is slowly committing suicide.
	And I would say that that's even bigger in Germany.
	I mean, you look at what is happening in Germany.
	Germany, big manufacturing powerhouse.
	And as Biden is putting restrictions on gas and on oil and all the rest of this stuff, they're also shutting down their nuclear power plants.
	They have no will to survive.
	The West has become a suicide cult.
	I mean, this is like Lord of the Rings, you know, where the elves are just marching silently through the woods to go out to the west to die.
	It's just sad to see it.
	But there is no will to get anything fixed or to fight these mandates coming from the globalists.
	And Italy, Naples, Italy...
	A researcher dead after an experimental hybrid electric car explodes while driving.
	In a tragic accident, a fatal explosion occurred as they were testing this.
	They were trying to combine an electric motor with batteries powered by solar panels in cars.
	No word yet about the exact problem with this, but of course we know how volatile these batteries are.
	I don't know if they have anything to do with their charging system being a problem with it.
	They're traveling on a major road in Naples as the thing blew up and the victims were rushed in critical condition, but they subsequently died in this.
	The dangers associated with EVs have also led to some governments taking action to protect the public.
	And we have seen this happening, as I've shown you pictures of parked buses that are electric and spontaneously catch fire and rapidly burn down.
	And yet, the Biden administration, Wants to spend a million dollars each on school buses.
	And they want to roll these things out in unlimited numbers, evidently.
	It's just amazing. Like I said, suicidal.
	Crazy stuff.
	The only way that you can explain this is with crony capitalism and the desire to grab as much money as they can while they're burning the country down, literally.
	Chevy's pulling the plug on the Silverado EV. Dead before it even arrives.
	And so this automotive report here from Mainstream, this is not Eric Peters, so they're not going to get to the bottom of this.
	This is from Top Speed.
	And what they're saying is it's one of the most highly anticipated electric trucks.
	Why? Well, because they were going to put it out, they said, at a very low price.
	You're going to be able to get an electric truck.
	For under $40,000, which is now a relatively low price.
	So evidently it was too cheap.
	They said, why did it get discontinued?
	Well, GM is not revealing why.
	So whatever we say here is going to be pure speculation.
	But prices of batteries and EV parts have been skyrocketing.
	The increased pressure on a lot of automakers to increase their prices as well.
	So for companies like GM and Ford who are still in the midst of a shift towards EV, it becomes even more difficult for them because they don't have the economy of scale yet because they're working on this stuff.
	So all those things are a part of the issue.
	But I thought this was maybe the most interesting of all the automotive news that I saw.
	And this is in the UK. The UK is warning drivers...
	That they will be fined 5,000 pounds if they wear sunglasses.
	What? That's like $6,300.
	So what's the point of this?
	You're not going to let people wear sunglasses?
	And of course, sunglasses can be a very important safety issue as well.
	We had some friends back in North Carolina who their young daughter was driving.
	She came around a corner and there was sunlight in her eyes.
	Maybe the windshield was a little bit dirty so you get that glare.
	And she didn't see that somebody was walking down the middle of the road and she hit them.
	And a woman lost the use of her arm and it was just hanging there for a long time.
	And eventually she had the arm amputated because it was just hanging there.
	It was a horrible thing for all of them.
	It really traumatized the young girl as well.
	If you have sunglasses, you can see through that stuff, right?
	And that helps to cut down that glare, especially if they're polarized.
	So why would they be doing this?
	This is a safety thing.
	The ability to wear sunglasses.
	And the excessive fine.
	5,000 pounds?
	$6,300? If you're caught wearing sunglasses?
	It's absolutely insane. And they're offering all these lame excuses.
	It sounds as stupid as Trump.
	Oh, you know, if you've got really wide temple pieces there, you know, that could obstruct your peripheral view.
	Come on, give me a break.
	You can make that argument about prescription glasses or whatever.
	If that's a real concern, you could outlaw that.
	But why outlaw sunglasses?
	Is everybody scratching their heads as to why this is happening?
	I think I have an idea.
	I think that they're getting ready to do a lot of facial scanning and recognition.
	Because they're really cutting, you know, slamming people down.
	The surveillance state in the UK is really horrific.
	And it's getting worse all the time.
	And they're doing all these things already to limit people's movements.
	You know, we just had New York City apply and, of course, get federal permission to charge people more if they go into New York City.
	And I guess they had to do that because the federal government gives them highway funds.
	I don't know why they had to ask the federal government unless it was for that.
	But the federal government and New York City are going to start charging people a big fee to go into the cities, like the expensive toll roads that they have there.
	And that's the type of thing that we have seen in the UK. But of course, the UK has moved on to its 15-minute cities and restricting people from going certain places or being able to transit certain areas more than a couple of times a month and all that kind of crazy stuff.
	They've got ultra-low emission zones.
	They're applying special taxes to people all the time.
	And I'm just assuming that it's part of the surveillance state always escalating.
	That they want to be able to see people's faces, and I think that's what this is about.
	Other than that, I cannot in the life of me understand why they would do this, but it reminds me of the song from Timbuk3, right?
	Future's so bright, I need shades.
	Is it going to be bright with a nuclear flash on the horizon?
	Because that's kind of what they were referring to in that song.
	Or is it going to be bright because they're going to be flashing bulbs in your face and taking a picture of you to save it for their biometric database?
	We'll be right back. Music Analyzing
	The Globalist Next Move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Thank you.
	Well, this news is just broken.
	The Supreme Court is issuing a lot of opinions last several days.
	This one is now coming out in terms of reverse discrimination is what it was called when the Bakke case was set aside.
	But now this is the affirmative action as colleges they said is unconstitutional.
	They ruled that admission policies of Harvard and the University of North Carolina are Which gave weight to a would-be student's race are unconstitutional.
	A blow to decades-old efforts to boost enrollment of racial minorities, says CNBC. But of course, you know, I think that this is blowback from the DEI, or I like to call it D-I-E, The diversity, inclusivity, and equity nonsense that is happening out there has become so weaponized.
	I think people are getting sick of it.
	And so the Supreme Court is essentially, in my understanding, reversing themselves over the Bakke decision.
	Roberts was joined by his five fellow conservatives.
	So this was 6-3.
	Said, these programs unavoidably employ race in a negative manner.
	They involve racial stereotyping.
	They lack meaningful endpoints.
	We have never permitted admissions programs to work in that way, and we will not do so today, said Roberts.
	Well, it's interesting.
	And so, Ketanji Brown Jackson said, Well, it was decades of precedent.
	She's right about that, but it was not progress.
	I think it's interesting, too, as I saw that Harvard and the University of North Carolina.
	You know, Harvard is the oldest university.
	It was a private university.
	It was actually a Christian seminary, if you can believe that at one point in time.
	Yale, too. Boy, they've really reversed that, haven't they?
	But anyway, it was the oldest university, a private university.
	University of North Carolina was the oldest state university.
	And they were the ones who were pushing this old idea that we were going to judge people by the color of their skin and not the content of their ability.
	And I think it's time to...
	Remove that. Anyway, interesting that they did reverse that.
	NBC News is saying that the chants that happened, not just in New York City, but a lot of different places, these pride parades, we're here, we're queer, and we're coming for your children.
	They said that's perfectly normal.
	And they said, don't worry, it's just a joke.
	Well, I don't see it as funny.
	The coming for your children chant has been used for years at pride events.
	Oh, no problem with that.
	According to longtime March attendees and gay rights activists who said it's one of many provocative expressions used to regain control of slurs against LGBT people.
	Well, maybe they might ought to rethink that.
	And, you know, they're joking about it, they said.
	I think it's amazing that they would push this out and say that that's a joke when that is actually what they are doing.
	And at the same time, I've seen all, and I haven't talked about, until I saw this, I haven't talked about all the stuff about Roseanne Barr.
	I've seen, oh, well, look, she says the Holocaust was fake, and there weren't six million Jews killed, and we do need to kill the six million Jews.
	If you look at the clip, I forget who the guy was that she was on with, but it was obviously satire.
	Obviously satire.
	And they're portraying this as if she's serious about this.
	I've seen it put on the headlines of one mainstream media news source after the other.
	They don't understand what satire is.
	That was satire.
	I don't think this, we're here and we're queer and we're coming for your kids.
	I don't think that is satire.
	You know, they spent everything exactly the opposite of what it was.
	You know, she began by repeating over and over again, oh, you know, we had in 31 counties 81 million votes.
	And, of course, that is absolutely true.
	We know that that can happen.
	And she repeated it over and over again because the other guy's like, what?
	The guy who was interviewing her was really slow on the uptake, and he was like, you know, he doesn't laugh.
	Oh, yeah, right. He's like, what, really?
	And she just kept repeating that line over and over again.
	Oh, yeah, we can get 81 million votes from 36 counties or whatever the numbers were.
	And so then she says, and then, of course, you know, the Holocaust was a complete thing and nobody died, but we should kill six million Jews right now and all the rest of this stuff.
	And he's like, what?
	What? It's obviously satire, but this is not satire.
	They are coming for the kids.
	We know they're coming for the kids.
	And this is what it looks like when they come for the kids.
	You've got a gender-confused teen, throws herself in front of a train, in california a heartbroken grieving california mother holding the state responsible for her mentally ill teenager's death that actually removed this child from her custody because she said that's not her problem she's got mental problems but uh you know she has uh you know this is not what it is and so they're taking advantage of people already have mental problems and they're pushing them even further Even the
	guy who's now and is like 21 or something, that child book, I Am Jazz, which is one of the core children's books they were using to push transgenderism on kids.
	That guy or girl, I don't know.
	I don't know who it is.
	They don't know who they are. But they're talking about how they're struggling with this, you know, and how it's difficult to go on, all the rest of the stuff.
	You see this over and over again from these poor kids.
	Who are groomed and gaslighted and pushed into all this stuff.
	They've already got mental issues.
	And you've got parents who are doing that stuff, Christy.
	Chris Christy. Unbelievable.
	You know, if the parents decide that they want to, you know, whatever they want to do to their kid, you know, give them drugs, give them alcohol, play with them sexually, whatever, you know, mutilate them, sterilize them.
	That's the parent's decision. We ought to stay out of it.
	No, no, you don't. But anyway, she said LA County School encouraged her child to take hormones, undergo gender reassignment surgery as a child, and failed to properly treat her for what the issue was, depression. School was telling her to go to these LGBT groups behind my back.
	She went from questioning her sexuality to questioning her gender.
	My daughter was taken from her loving home because the state of California claims that I was abusive because I did not affirm her trans identity.
	I lost my daughter over a name and pronouns, and now that daughter has committed suicide by stepping in front of a train.
	Yeah, they're coming for the kids.
	They absolutely are. On Rockfin, thank you very much, Jay Gold.
	I appreciate the tip. And he says, Russian roulette.
	David, you spin the cylinder when you take the Trump clot shot, not the barrel.
	Just saying. That's right.
	Yeah, the cylinder. Yeah, you're feeling lucky, punk, because we're going to push this out.
	Americans, there's a poll that was taken by another media organization.
	McLaughlin Associates, a summit org, they found that 61% of voters...
	When asked about this transgender stuff with kids, 61% said it hurts kids emotionally and psychologically.
	31% seeing it as beneficial to children.
	The majority of the same voter pool, 63%, also believe that there is a cultural agenda afoot amongst those who choose to expose children to transgender themes, drag shows, LGBT issues, and so forth.
	With recent boycotts and controversies surrounding Bud Light and Target for their handling of LGBT issues, the contention shows no sign of slowing down.
	And of course, this is now no longer a Democrat issue either, as we saw the California GOP doing with Rick Grinnell.
	They want a virtue signal with their conservative people, right?
	And Trump is doing the same thing.
	Rick Grinnell was one of the people he's virtue signaling with.
	He virtue signals to the organizations as Biden is signing a law purporting to define marriage.
	And, of course, that law itself is not constitutional.
	Nobody has challenged it yet.
	It's going to be difficult to prove that you've got standing in order to challenge that law.
	You have to show, well, I was hurt by the fact that they put this in, and so it's going to be almost impossible for somebody to challenge that law.
	But I guess if you refused on some basis something and that would be the basis of your hurt, then you would be able to challenge that law.
	But they said no month better epitomizes the lengths that companies will go to in order to kiss the ring of the progressive left Pride Month in June.
	Except we see the GOP doing it in California.
	We see the GOP doing it in other places and in other ways.
	I think what Ted Cruz was doing was kissing the ring of this.
	And even Google is distancing itself somewhat from this.
	They know what people think.
	I don't think they necessarily care what people think because of what they do with YouTube.
	But there was a pushback as part of their Pride events.
	They decided they would have a popular performer known as Peaches Christ, who just like these perpetual sisters of indulgence brings in religion into their mockery.
	And why would we be surprised about that?
	Because all of this stuff is antithetical to God.
	All the sexual degeneracy, the gender grooming, why wouldn't they do that?
	But of course they had several hundred employees sign a petition.
	Google has now backed down on that.
	But of course the Pope hasn't.
	It's not an LGBT thing, but he's invited the artist that did that piss Christ thing.
	He invited him to the Vatican.
	Yeah, isn't that amazing? Thanks for listening.
	Let me tell you, the David Knight Show, you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	Ha ha ha! And you want to know something else?

▲