All Episodes
Previous Next
June 4, 2024 - David Icke
11:48
Social Services Are Becoming A Parents Worst Nightmare - David Icke
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I am here to bring light.
It's about healing.
you Mind, body, soul.
Don't ever settle.
Find your purpose.
Find the answers.
Don't hold back.
Achieve maximum success.
Book with me if you want to live.
Available now.
Available now.
you One of the things you've written about extensively, which is one of the big things of this cult, and it's one of the deep in the rabbit hole issues, has been the taking of children for various different reasons, but the taking of children away from parents who there's no reason for them to be taken away.
And this story is here from the UK this week, which talks about doctors basically using very tenuous excuses to get social services involved in the family.
Yeah, well, you see, social services, which once had a connotation, and this is not just in Britain, this is in America, this is in Canada, this is all over.
It had a connotation at one time of, oh, the cavalry's arrived, we're going to get some help.
Now, a knock on the door if you're a parent from social services is your worst nightmare.
Because of all the kids that have been taken away from loving parents for spurious reasons.
And the whole thing really started to change with the Children's Act of 1989 in the last breaths of the Thatcher era and the Children's Act of 2004 under Tony
Blair.
The criteria for taking children away from their parents was expanded.
And what was brought in was emotional harm.
Now, of course, emotional harm, you can drive a coach and horses through that definition and make it whatever you choose it to be.
And the story this week that I saw has been highlighted Parents' nightmare after doctor mistook rare bruise condition for abuse and called in social workers to take away daughter.
Not only the daughter, but the other child of the couple as well.
They were told to hand over their children to social services and in lots and lots of circumstances, and I've been involved in a few of these things, trying to help people over the years.
Once they're in the hands of social services, it's very, very difficult to get them back.
So, they were told to hand over their children to social services after a doctor mistook their baby daughter's bruise for a sign of abuse during a three-minute consultation.
Now, this is a child, Robin Parker Briggs, who suffers from this rare condition.
Where just a touch will create a bruise.
And the mother had all the medical records showing that this condition was was why it was happening.
But they were at a hospital, I think it was in Newcastle, and another doctor was called in to examine the child.
This three-minute doctor.
And he wasn't interested when the parents said, we've got the medical records.
He said, we've got to get social services involved.
The man, if it was a man, complete idiot, obviously, with no empathy for the parents.
And this started A period of three months where fighters they did, they had to move in with in-laws because the social services said you cannot be with your children unless someone else is there.
And that was a bonus really because in most cases they're just taken away.
And often you very rarely see them again and then don't see them at all as they're fostered out.
And this is part of a much bigger picture.
You've got idiot doctors.
Yes.
And again, these Children's Acts brought that much more in that anyone to do with children had to report things if they Believe there was a problem.
And I have no problem at all with children of abusive parents who are violent to them being taken away from them.
Why would I have a problem with that?
But that's not what's going on, not least with this emotional harm definition that's come in.
And what is happening?
And I know this because, like I say, I've been involved in trying to help a lot of these people over the years, parents and stuff.
Enormous, enormous numbers of children are being taken away from loving parents.
And there's another element to this, which I also came across a long time ago, which is that there are paedophile rings that have their operatives within social services.
That is not to say that all social workers are paedophiles.
I'm not saying that.
Also satanic rings as well, by the way.
But there are people that represent these rings that are in that social service network.
And through them, they can not only target children to get them taken away from their parents, they can target specific children.
Where they'll identify a child and they'll say, we want that child.
And what then happens is a spurious reason is concocted for that child to be taken away from their parents and fostered.
And then you see what happens after that.
So many children that enter the so-called care network disappear.
And so this This is not about taking children from abusive parents.
I'm all for that.
Of course I am.
But that's not what much of this is about.
It's about taking children to get them away from parents.
And this is an example that is just ridiculous given the medical background that could easily have been seen.
Is this something you foresee accelerating as well in coming years?
Oh yeah, you see, once you've got a situation where doctors can willy-nilly report something to social services, once you've got a situation where a neighbour with a grudge can ring social services and report you for doing things you're not doing, Once you have psychopaths that want to hurt someone and so they do the same, call social services, make a fake report, which the parents are not allowed to know who it is, then you have a situation where
Anyone is at risk, and like I said earlier, you know, you talk to parents, and I've talked to parents who've had this done to them, many, many of them, and social services, it's like strikes terror in them, the thought that social services are going to come around.
And so they should, where genuine abuse is taking place, but most of the time it's not.
And because of, well, emotional harm, well, we'll define that as we choose, the numbers are fantastic that are taken from loving parents now, all over the world, not just in Britain.
Yeah, and there's quite a few quite well-known cases of kids that should have definitely been taken away from parents that weren't, and obviously are not with us anymore.
Ah, but, yeah, but that's another thing, you see.
If, you know, if children are not protected from abusive parents, violently abusive parents, And you let those parents go on doing it, then you have a scandal that breaks eventually.
And that scandal gives more momentum to taking more kids from their parents.
Again, it's all about perception in the end.
So if the evidence is there, fine.
But most of the time, and it is most of the time, it's not.
And that's...
Imagine, imagine, you're a parent, you know, I'm a parent, I mean, just imagine what it feels like.
I've looked in the eyes of many parents who've been through this and they're just broken.
Yeah, I can't even imagine it.
Because, you know, their children are taken away, they've done nothing to them.
And they just hand it to other people.
And in many cases, they never see him again.
Certainly not until they're adults.
I mean, it's almost unimaginable.
And like I say, if you are abusing your child, like, you know, violently, then, well, you should have them taken away.
But just imagine it when you haven't.
When you're a loving parent, and that happens, and I have met so many who have been in that situation, and they were the tip of the iceberg.
Yeah, I can't even begin to imagine it without getting emotional to be honest, so I'm gonna try not.
There's a lot of things that I've said over the years which were perceived to be crazy
and then suddenly the heat.
They start to move mainstream.
I'm waiting for someone to convince me that we don't live in a simulation.
What is real?
How do you define real?
If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, taste and see, then real is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain.
▲
Export Selection