All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 3, 2026 - The Culture War - Tim Pool
31:03
CIVIL WAR! Democrat INSURGENCY Continues, Trump Says GOP Must NATIONALIZE Election

The snowflake doesn't blame itself for the avalanche. This is just another grain of sand in the heap.  BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO SUPPORT THE SHOW - https://castbrew.com/ Become A Member And Protect Our Work at http://www.timcast.com Host: Tim Pool @Timcast (everywhere) Guest: My Second Channel - https://www.youtube.com/timcastnews Podcast Channel - https://www.youtube.com/TimcastIRL

Participants
Main
t
tim pool
29:26
Appearances
h
harry enten
cnn 01:04
|

Speaker Time Text
Trump's Joking Controversy 00:06:16
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
Recently, Donald Trump appeared in the Dan Bongino show and said that the GOP should nationalize the election or elections, basically saying we should take them over and control them from the federal level.
Democrats, of course, are freaking out over the statement.
And Trump has previously said maybe we shouldn't even have a midterm, which he can't functionally or constitutionally end.
And they said they were joking, but Democrats aren't taking it like a joke.
Of course, we've had Republicans and Democrats both say this is civil war, as well as high-profile, prominent billionaires saying, guys, it's happening.
Now, you know, I've been the guy who talked about civil war for quite some time, and I don't know exactly whether or not we're in one.
I don't know that anyone can actually say for sure, but many people are.
Before we get into all of these details, I want you to just watch this video from Ford Fisher out of Minnesota.
Then you comment below and tell me where you think we are right now in this country.
In this video, I'll set it up for you guys.
I know some of you are just listening and not watching.
Armed ICE agents pointing their handguns at a vehicle with drivers and it pulling them out.
Again, at gunpoint.
I am not suggesting right or wrongdoing in either party, just explaining what we are seeing here.
These individuals were identified as anti-ICE observers.
I don't think it's a fair assessment considering we have, by any reasonable metric, an active insurgency at bare minimum in Minnesota.
Before we get into everything in the political space, just watch this video.
Let's play it.
I'll narrate the book for those that have just listened.
His photographer, PICATEN pushes him back.
There's one agent holding a gun pointed at the driver.
Another agent holding a gun pointed at the passenger side as they are pulling these individuals out of the vehicle.
The people in the vehicles are masked up.
Get the F back.
And these are identified again as anti-ICE observers.
I don't think that's a fair or reasonable journalistic interpretation of what these people actually are.
The question is, watching videos like this, what can we understand from it?
I'm sure if you are on the right, you think it's justified.
These people are insurgents.
They are playing dangerous games of subterfuge and manipulation.
On the left, this is overreach and a violation of the First Amendment.
But you know what, my friends?
I would argue that none of that actually matters.
The moralizing, the propagandizing is completely immaterial to what we're actually seeing.
For the most part, you can sit here and tell me why or why not it was justified, and that's fine.
That was always allowed.
But the reality is we have two distinct moral worldviews in this country, as I have explained, with many people suggesting that Donald Trump would be totally justified in taking over under federal management these areas that are in active rebellion against the federal government.
Well, the left argues that Trump is a fascist who is taking over and they don't need to abide by his laws.
We have an interesting story, which gives us a granular piece of what is actually going on.
TPS, temporary protective status, is set to expire for Haitian migrants.
That's it.
It's going to expire.
Well, a judge has ruled it can't.
That's not democracy.
The American people voted for immigration enforcement and it's just expiring.
It's not like Trump came in with a boot and said, we're kicking everybody out.
Trump's administration said, we're just not going to extend this.
And a court ordered the president and the executive branch to extend something.
They don't have the authority.
So my friends, while you may say Trump is certainly acting out of bounds, the liberals would say that.
And conservatives would say the left is, it's fair to say that these judges actually are.
And when you look at the data coming out of Minnesota, I'm going to say this.
I'm going to say it, my friends.
The nature of this reality is that Donald Trump has always been relatively weak.
He has been.
He's done some pretty strong things, don't get me wrong, but the machine state has always been stronger.
The idea that a judge can force the executive branch to extend migration protections, they have no authority in this area.
And what does Trump do?
He petitions another court.
None of this makes sense.
But I can tell you that.
The rule of law is being ripped apart, or I should say democracy, by liberal institutions and this liberal moral worldview.
With some pointing out that this judge who issued this ruling is not even from this country.
Now, again, you may say, Tim, who cares?
What does it matter?
The liberals might argue.
That's fine.
I'm telling you.
The right is going to push back saying, we can't have people born in other countries come here and then mandate non-citizens be allowed temporary protected status extensions when the president hasn't authorized it.
Now, I want to read for you this story from the New York Times about Trump calling for the nationalization of elections as what's currently happening with this insurgency.
Before we do, my friends, as we always do with our post-apocalyptic dystopia, we promote coffee.
The world may be ending, but you can still get a great cup of Joe from castbrew.com.
Our latest Rum Runner's Roast.
It's a Highlanders grog, a buttery rum flavor.
It's quite delicious, I might add.
But don't forget, if you go to the ground coffee or whole bean, you can see we've got a big selection of delicious coffees.
You've got your decaf, you got your unwoken sleepy Joe, but we've got Boston cream.
We call it American cream.
We got birthday cake s'mores.
We got Irish cream.
We've got gingerbread.
And then you got your standards, your French roasts, your Appalachian Knights.
I recommend it.
Go to castbrew.com, support the show, and don't forget, go to TimCast.com, click join us, and get in that Discord server.
Community is everything, my friends.
And we've got an active community of tens of thousands of people.
They're hanging out every single day and they want to hear from you, debate, argue, network.
It's how we build companies.
It's how we build civilization.
And it's how we defend our views and our way of life.
So again, Timcast.com, click join us.
Hang out, man.
We're waiting for you.
Here's the news from the New York Times.
Voting Rights and Power 00:14:29
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
Trump, in an escalation, calls for Republicans to nationalize elections.
The comments made on a conservative podcast follow a string of moves from his administration to try to exert more control over American elections.
Now, Trump has made comments before, and some people say he's just joking, while others say these are trial balloons.
When Trump comes out and says we should nationalize the election, if someone then says that's overreach, you can't do that, he can say, I was just joking around, as he said with not having midterm elections.
Now, he may just be joking around.
I can't read his mind, but therein lies the bifurcation and worldview.
The left says he's launching trial balloons.
The right says he's goofing off.
The New York Times reports, President Trump called in a new interview for the Republican Party to nationalize voting in the United States, an aggressive rhetorical step that was likely to raise new worries about his administration's efforts to involve itself in election matters.
During an extended monologue about immigration on a podcast released on Monday by Dan Bongino, let me just pause real quick.
It was a live show, guys.
As former Deputy Epiet Director, Trump called for Republican officials to take over voting procedures in 15 states, though he didn't name them.
The Republicans should say we want to take over.
We should take over the voting.
The voting in at least many, 15 places, the Republicans ought to nationalize the voting.
Under the Constitution, American elections are governed primarily by state law, leading to a decentralized process in which voting is administered by county and municipal officials in thousands of precincts across the country.
Mr. Trump, however, has long been fixated on the false claims these elections are rife with fraud and that Democrats are perpetrating a vast conspiracy to have undocumented immigrants vote and lift the party's turnout.
Now, if the New York Times were honest actors, they can tell you the truth, for which I can tell you right now.
You see, the issue is not that illegal immigrants are voting, though Trump and others may say that because they don't genuinely understand what is actually happening.
Well, over the past few years, many people have gotten wise to the fact that Illegal immigrants are counted in the census, which gives Democrat sanctuary jurisdictions bonus congressional seats and electoral college votes.
As most of you know, individuals don't vote for the president.
You vote for electors.
The electors then vote for the president.
So what happens?
If California has a million undocumented immigrants, see I'm being nice, I call them undocumented, they're going to get an extra congressional seat and vote in the Electoral College, which means it doesn't matter if the individual illegal immigrant actually goes to vote, which sometimes it happens, sure.
All that matters is at the state level, they've taken that power.
And that's something important that should be discussed.
Now, on top of that, as they bring up that it's a decentralized process where the localities have their votes, let me explain something to you guys.
Texas v. Pennsylvania, which never got answered because our Supreme Court, it's a bunch of pathetic cowards, save Alito and Thomas, refused to answer the question if state judiciaries and executives have the authority under the Constitution to unilaterally change the election in these states.
The answer is they don't.
The Constitution affords that to state legislatures.
And they did not change these rules in 2020.
The judges and the governors did.
And that effectively tainted the results.
Not through fraud, but through unconstitutional amendments, I suppose, by unilateral authorities or judges outside the legislative branch of those states.
So you want to call it decentralized?
Well, it's your fault, Democrats, that we're in this position.
And I warned this would literally happen.
Not because I'm a psychic, because it's patently obvious.
If you allow states to violate the Constitution, you end up here.
The New York Times goes on.
Mr. Trump's remarkable call for a political party to seize the mechanisms of voting following a string of moves from his administration to try to exert more control over American elections as he and his allies continue to make false claims about 2020.
Last week, FBI agents seized ballots and other voting records from the 2020 election in Fulton County, Georgia, whereas allies have for years pursued false claims of election fraud.
The New York Times reported on Monday that Mr. Trump had spoken on the phone to FBI agents involved in the Fulton County raid, praising and thanking them.
The Justice Department, which has been newly politicized under Mr. Trump, is demanding that numerous states, including Minnesota, turn over their full voter roles as the Trump administration tries to build a national voter file.
In March, Mr. Trump signed an executive order that tried to make significant changes to the electoral process, including requiring documentary proof of citizenship and demanding that all mailed ballots be received by the time the polls close on election day.
But that effort has largely been rebuffed by courts.
On social media, Mr. Trump has pushed for even more drastic changes in August.
He wrote that he wanted to end the use of mail-in ballots and potentially the use of voting machines.
The president's claims of election fraud have been debunked over and over, both by independent reviews and Republican officials.
A review of the 2024 election by the Trump admin that began last year found little evidence of widespread voting fraud by non-citizens as of last month.
Now, let me just point something out that's very fascinating.
It doesn't matter what side of the aisle you're on.
They say Trump has pushed for even more drastic changes, ending mail-in ballots and potentially the use of voting machines.
Universal mail-in ballots are new since the COVID era.
That was the problem in Pennsylvania, the crux of the lawsuit.
They wanted universal mail-in votes in violation of their own state constitution.
They never amended their constitution nor followed their own laws to make this happen.
So to call it a drastic change now shows you the extent they are willing to go.
I'm not going to cut Trump any slack on saying nationalize the election, but I'm at least going to tell you why.
Both sides are making moves they feel are justified.
The left's argument, in my opinion, is founded largely in hyperbole and partisan ideology that Trump is a fascist and an existential threat, justifying their use of force to go after his lawyers, which is insane.
Trump, on the other hand, is arguing that what Democrats have done warrants the nationalization.
You choose.
I'm not going to tell you which side to be on.
You know where I stand.
From CNN.
Here's where it gets fun.
No, Trump can't cancel the midterms.
He's doing this instead.
Oh yeah, what's he doing?
Well, they're not telling you what he's doing.
They're basically just saying he's joking about ending the elections or unconstitutional third terms or whatever.
This is largely CNN's waste of time article.
It doesn't actually address anything.
The point is, the conversation is here.
Democrats and Republicans are escalating the rhetoric, and it's come to this point.
Presidents do not have the power to delay or cancel.
Okay, let's talk about that.
Do they?
Does the president have the power to say exclude certain states from an election to arrest members of Congress or journalists?
The answer is yes, they do.
And you have none other than Abraham Lincoln to thank for this.
Now, of course, I love this.
You go and ask any liberal, and they'll say, no, absolutely not.
Well, they'll praise Abraham Lincoln in the same breath.
I asked Grock quite a bit and he kept saying, no, the president can't.
And then I said, cut the ish.
Tell me about Abraham Lincoln.
And it was like, well, you see, what Abraham Lincoln did was a whole bunch of illegal stuff that he then retroactively got approved by Congress after he threatened to put them all in prison.
I'm being hyperbolic, to be honest.
He didn't go to Congress.
I'm going to lock you all up, but he basically said, I can put down the boot wherever and whenever I want.
So approve it.
And they said, okay, we will.
Now, is that legal?
Was that how our system was supposed to work?
Take a look at this from Kalshi.
I love this one.
Which party will win the U.S. House of Representatives?
Right now, it's looking like the Democrats.
That's the prediction.
And what do you think these Democrats are going to do once they actually get in?
Well, they've arrested Trump several times.
They've arrested his lawyers.
They've accused tons of conservatives of impropriety.
They put Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro in jail.
Do you think they're going to stop?
And do you think Donald Trump will let them just win?
Well, there's the question of political willpower.
Abraham Lincoln had it to an absurd degree.
Let's just be honest.
Donald Trump knows that should he lose the midterms, he's cooked.
And right now, it's not looking good.
Republican turnout in one of the latest elections was gone.
Take a look at this from Newsweek.
Republicans did not show up in Texas election won by Democrats.
We already saw what happened in Virginia.
In Virginia, within a week, they're passing laws to make sure no Republican ever wins again.
And the redistricting, what is happening between states, is effectively making it so that there will be no swing districts.
All it will be in Congress is state versus state, population versus population.
Boiling down to which side has more people under their belts, Republicans or Democrats.
And I hope you understand what that means.
Again, Democrat-majority states are gerrymandering, redistricting to eliminate any Republican seat.
Republican seats doing the same.
This means that in the next congressional apportionment, whichever side has more population in their states will own Congress, not by argument, but by mass.
And what happens then when you have 25 states that are Democrat-leaning and 25 states Republican-leaning, and only one of those states has a say in Congress?
I doubt the weak side, be it Republican or Democrat, is going to blindly just accept this is their new reality.
So I asked my good friend Grock here several questions about the powers a president has.
What can he actively do?
And I'll start showing the first question.
Is there any circumstance where he as president could postpone or cancel an election?
No.
There is no circumstance in which a president has unilateral authority to postpone.
And then I said, even in nuclear war, yep, even a nuclear war.
I said, what about National Security Presidential Decade 51?
Nope, not even then.
I said, okay, propose a scenario the president with or without authority could do it.
There is no lawful scenario, it says.
And I said, what if a civil war to break out?
No, not even in a civil war.
I said, yes, but the civil war excluded rebelling states.
And let's go to the finale.
The grand finale, my friends.
I said, Lincoln did a ton of illegal stuff.
So I said, okay, let's start over and you can stop pretending that humans run on binary code.
We know Lincoln ignored the Constitution, so Trump could as well.
Then after he wins, Congress can retroactively claim he was just.
Indeed.
You see, the point is the AI says, no, the Constitution, the laws, they don't allow it.
When has it ever stopped, men of consequence?
Fair point, Tim.
Politics ain't a clean binary system.
It's messy driven by power, crises, and what people and institutions will stomach.
Lincoln absolutely pushed and arguably broke constitutional limits.
Arguably, suspending habeas corpus is not a power the president has.
Now he does because Abraham Lincoln set precedent.
Habeas corpus suspension.
Listen to this.
Right after Fort Sumter in 1861, Lincoln unilaterally suspended the writ of habeas corpus along key routes to detain suspected rebels without trial.
This led to thousands of arrests, including civilians.
Chief Justice Taney ruled it unconstitutional in ex parte marrow then 1861, saying only Congress could suspend it under Article 1, Section 9.
Lincoln basically ignored Taney, kept doing it, and expanded it nationwide.
In his July 4th, 1861 message to Congress, he defended it and sort of asked for retroactive approval.
Quote, are all the laws but one to go unexecuted and the government itself to go to pieces lest that one be violated?
Congress obliged the habeas corporate suspension act of 1863, which not only authorized future suspensions, but indemnified, protected from lawsuits, Lincoln and his team from past ones.
It was a classic ask forgiveness, not permission played, and it worked because Congress was on board amid the war.
And it was because Confederate states were no longer active functionally in Congress.
So of course, they were going to say, Lincoln, do whatever you want to shut down the Confederacy.
And they approved it two years after the war had already begun.
And there's the interesting question.
It's fascinating.
Are all laws but one to go unexecuted and the government itself to go to pieces lest that one be violated?
What an amazing argument.
Trump could certainly argue the same thing.
We have an act of insurgency in Minnesota.
Should every law that we have codified through Congress go unenforced because you're upset that I would dare violate a single one?
What an argument.
Lincoln made it, not Trump.
Lincoln made the argument.
Well, Trump did say, one who saves his country violates no laws, which I believe was a Napoleon quote or asserted to be.
The argument is this.
If in Minnesota we see the federal authority falling apart, is it better that the president violate one law to save the union and protect federal authority or to let federal authority collapse completely?
It's interesting, right?
The president can't enforce federal law right now because the left is in insurgency.
Should he then say, I'm going in, shutting them down?
No, you can't.
That's illegal.
Well, everything they're doing is illegal all the same.
Other overreaches.
Lincoln called up 75,000 troops and spent unappropriated treasury funds without Congress in session, violating Article I's war powers.
He imposed martial law in parts of loyal states, shut down disloyal newspapers, and used military trials for civilians.
Congress later ratified most of this in 1861 to 1863 sessions, essentially saying, cool, we'll backdate the authority.
The Supreme Court upheld some, but struck down others post-war.
Lincoln's logic.
In a rebellion, the president, as commander-in-chief, has implied powers to act fast when Congress can't convene.
He won the war, so history mostly forgave him, though Democrats called him a tyrant, and it fueled Reconstruction debates in which a man cried out, sick, semper, tyrannous, and blasted him because he violated the Constitution and justified it.
I'm not saying there's justification.
Police Monopoly On Force 00:09:23
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
I don't know.
What I can tell you is this.
This is from stars.us.
Military intelligence officers warn Minneapolis is an organized insurgency.
The Soro Pyramid, Special Operations Research Office, Special Warfare Center at School and School, Fort Bragg.
Eric Schwom, retired Green Beret, writes, as a former Special Forces Warrant Officer with multiple rotations running counterinsurgency ops, both hunting insurgents and trying to separate them from synthetic populations, I've seen organized resistance up close.
From Anbar to Hellman, the pattern is familiar.
Spotters, cutouts, dead drops, disciplined comms, role specialization, and a willingness to absorb casualties while bleeding the stronger force slowly.
What's unfolding in Minneapolis right now is in a protest.
It's a low-level insurgency infrastructure built by people who've clearly studied the playbook.
Signal groups at 1,000 member cap per zone, dedicated roles, mobile chasers, plate checkers, logging vehicle data, salute-style reporting, daily chat rotations, vetting process for new joiners, mutual aid from synthetic locals, home-based coordination points, rapid escalation.
I think I got some videos for you.
How about this one?
This is from Wall Street Apes.
A Minnesota resident was trying to go to a new burger joint.
They were stopped by insurgent border patrol.
I have no other means of describing what this is.
unidentified
Well, that I don't know.
Can I drive?
I got a red light.
So now we need permission to drive from these.
Can you back up slightly and go right?
Yeah, I could.
If you'll leave, I'll go right.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
Cleared.
We ran your plates.
unidentified
Thank you.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
Now they're letting them through.
Thank you, he says.
Thank you.
This is how you get oppression.
No one is stopping these people.
Sooner or later, people begin to recognize that they bow to them and not the police.
The monopoly on force dictates.
So let me say it like this.
If you are in Minnesota, you don't fear the police.
People are committing crimes and getting away with it.
Prisoners, criminals, they're being released from these jails across the country.
Along comes this de facto authority blocking roadways and threatening you with violence for which they will not be prosecuted.
Who do you fear?
This regular person driving their car to a burger joint said thank you.
Because that's the true authority now and they know it.
Choose your battles, they say in their mind, and they've chosen not to engage in this one.
How much longer until these people have uniforms?
They're already wearing vests.
How much longer until they set up new checkpoints?
How much longer until the government basically bends the knee?
This is how all insurgencies and civil wars go.
A new partisan group, it's like the Nazis.
Not to cite Godwin's law, but it is.
A partisan group takes up arms, gets violent, and eventually the local government says, you're in charge.
And then a political party becomes government.
And that's what we're watching happen right here.
How about this one?
North Central High School in Indianapolis states an ICE walkout.
Here you go, watch this.
The stupid music.
It's not really a walkout.
It's just people saying, I ain't going to school.
And they're running around jumping on vehicles.
There's so much more that's been happening.
The smashing of windows, just the recklessness.
Now here's where it's interesting.
Polls deliver clear verdict.
Americans back Trump's deportation agenda and reject anti-ICE politics.
We've got this one, Clay Travis.
83% of Americans favor requiring voter ID.
harry enten ▲ ● ▼
The American people are with Nicki Minaj, because what are we talking about here?
So take a look here.
Favor voter ID to vote.
Look, I got all this polling on the screen going back since 2018.
You'll notice on all of it, it's all north of 75%, 76%, 76%, 76%, 81%.
And then 83% in the last year of Americans agree with Nicki Minaj.
They favor photo ID to be able to vote.
unidentified
What about by party?
harry enten ▲ ● ▼
What's the party break?
Yeah, normally you might expect, hey, there'd be a big divide by party with Republicans really for it and Democrats really against it, but not really here.
I mean, just take a look here.
Favor photo ID to vote.
You got 95% of Republicans, pretty much all of them, but even 71% of Democrats favor photo ID to vote.
So again, Nicki Minaj posting that on X.
And what you see is that the American people, actually, it's not really all that controversial.
The American people are with Nicki Minaj, whether they are Republican or even if they are Democrats, we're talking about seven in 10 Democrats agreeing with Nicki Minaj that you in fact should show a voter photo ID to vote.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
They may be saying, Tim, that sounds like a good thing.
I mean, it sounds here like Democrats and Republicans agree on securing our elections.
I bring that up.
Sure, we can assess it as such.
But this video right here, I think, then rebuffs.
You see, the reality is that even if you're a Democrat, even if you're a moderate, whatever you might vote, when it comes time to stare down a crowd of people masked up and with weapons, people just say, leave me alone.
And that can be the far-left insurgents, and that could be ICE.
As I showed you from the first video, the ICE agents come with guns pointed at these individuals.
You have conflict.
Let me just make sure you recognize what that video was and why I wanted to show you.
Uniformed ICE agents with guns detaining anti-ICE insurgents.
It's not you.
It's not a regular American.
It's partisan groups fighting the federal government and the federal government taking action.
These are not observers.
These are partisans.
This is partisan conflict.
I believe that it is very likely we will see more.
Now, the one thing I can say is Republicans apparently are raking it in, generating lots and revenue right before the midterms are about to come.
Tom Cruise leaving London is indicative of the left, but that's for a later segment.
But we do have all that pulled out.
This is where I was bringing those together.
I wasn't actually, you know, I'll just let you guys know.
The Tom Crew stuff was maybe I was going to attach to the end of this.
It is London, that's why.
But it's because I bring up this.
This is a story from August 25th.
Congress is investigating allegations that D.C. police manipulated crime data.
And this is where it all comes to a head.
What we've seen is that Democrats have been releasing criminals.
Regular people believe the police won't come and help you.
And even if someone is arrested, they'll be released right away.
So what is happening?
The government's monopoly on violence is being ripped to shreds intentionally by Democrat politicians.
Cops complain they can't actually arrest anybody.
CVB complains they can't actually arrest these illegal immigrants.
Even today, they still complain quite a bit.
So what happens?
When the regular American recognizes that the police will do nothing, then they walk down the street and see Antifa, they say, I know who threatens me.
And the police will do nothing.
In fact, the police will likely protect the far left extremists.
But the extremists will kill you on the spot.
They'll bash your car up and no one will do anything about it.
So I envision a couple different scenarios watching all of this.
With this, sooner or later someone says no.
And then what happens when a guy shows up and he says, get the F out of my way?
And they say no.
And what happens when that man is armed?
Sooner or later, someone says no.
What happens if someone just plows through their blockade and just shatters it to pieces, hitting people?
I don't think, I don't think we're heading in a good place.
Because let me say it like this.
We're already at the point where six years ago, the left were blocking vehicles, and then people would speed through, hitting some of these people, not running them over or anything, but they'd hit them out of the way.
And you'd hear the left then say, arrest them for a hit and run.
And it started to happen.
People would get charged.
And then laws got passed in some of these red states saying, if you intentionally block a roadway and surround a vehicle, they can flee and they are not responsible for what happens to you.
And so now we've seen many of these far leftists get hit by cars, and the drivers have not been charged.
There's one video where a driver is at a school and someone jumps in front of an SUV and they try to flee, hit the person who falls over, and they scream hit and run.
Nothing's happened as far as I can tell.
Nobody cares.
No one's going to track down this SUV except the leftists.
And depending on the jurisdiction, you may or may not get action.
So what happens next?
So long as they keep doing things like this, maybe Minnesota falls.
Trump is too weak to actually deal with it.
ICE is going out, just basically creating favorable propaganda for leftist recruitment, not actually solving the problem.
They've been too weak.
And then vigilantes show up.
As much as these far leftists can do what they're doing, right-wingers can do all the same if they choose.
Now we've seen what happens to Proud Boys and Patriot Prayer and these people who stand up to Antifa.
But the Titans, they are a changing.
They are absolutely a changing.
And now the right is starting to understand the tactics of the left.
And the mistake the Proud Boys made was not wearing a mask, but now ICE is.
So what happens when a guy gets a vehicle with no plates, wears a mask, and rams through these people, or shows up with a gun?
Because we've already seen the escalation.
Why would we not see even more?
Masked Threats Escalate 00:00:54
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
That's my fear.
Now again, maybe Trump was joking with the elections.
unidentified
I don't know.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
I suppose we'll just have to wait and see like all things and hope that the escalation stops.
Can you give me any reason to believe the escalation will?
Because I'm looking for one every day.
You know, the one thing I've talked about with some friends is that we want to bring some humor back.
And these morning shows that I do, they're always a bit dark.
So I've been talking to the crew.
I said, IRL the hangouts.
It needs to be more fun.
You know, I can be dire when I do segments like this and talk about the seriousness of what's going on.
But at least when we're hanging out with the boys and the ladies or Timcast IRL, we should be laughing a bit more.
Maybe we can try and calm things down.
I just hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I think any reasonable person would recognize that it's very difficult to do.
Smash the like button, share the show, subscribe.
Thanks for hanging out.
Export Selection