Happy Wednesday, everybody, and holy moly, I am so serious when I say that reading this headline just completely threw me for a loop.
I can't even believe this is real.
So the question of the day today is, is Big Pharma getting ready to experiment on children that have Down syndrome in America?
And the answer to that question, I'll tell you right up top, is absolutely yes.
Later on in the show, we're going to jump back into the insane asylum that is TikTok.
Why your children should never be on it.
This time we've come across a woman who is watering her plants.
And when I mean watering her plants, I mean she's storing her menstruation blood and giving it to plants because people are really coming undone.
All that and more today coming up on Candace Owens.
All right, so here is the headline.
Scientists test vaccine designed to protect people with Down syndrome from developing Alzheimer's.
So many red flags right there.
I can't even begin. But let's just figure out what it is we're talking about.
Why would you need to test vaccines, expand a trial to people that are living with Down syndrome?
So it reads, Down syndrome occurs in people born with an extra chromosome, which typically leads to learning difficulties and physical abnormalities.
Experts, we always trust the experts, believe they are more vulnerable to the condition due to a DNA fault that limits the body's ability to clear a toxic protein from the brain called amyloid plaque, which has long been thought to be a cause of Alzheimer's.
Last month, the Swiss pharmaceutical firm AC Immune announced that it had administered the first dose of its anti-amyloid vaccine to a patient with Down syndrome.
It has now been given approval to expand the trial from Switzerland to the United States in order to offer the vaccine to more people with the condition.
If that's successful, further tests of the vaccine will be carried out to see if it can prevent Alzheimer's and elderly people who do not have Down syndrome.
So let's just pause right there and think about why this registers as just so many red flags.
First and foremost, you know who I am.
Obviously, I've been beating my drum for a very long time about vaccines, about the corruption of big pharma.
I took really big career risks when the COVID vaccine was being trialed
on a bunch of people and we were being systematically lied to by big pharma in conjunction with big governments
who were simply trying to mint nine new billionaires as they rushed out a vaccine and told people
that it was gonna prevent them from getting or spreading COVID.
And then once they made their profits, they went back and said, oh, we got it wrong
as if they didn't know that they got those things wrong.
So the vaccine industry is something that I have been awake to.
For those of you that are watching a shot in the dark, great, I think it's the most important work that I do
to show that we do here once a week on Daily Wire Plus.
First three episodes are free on YouTube.
But beyond that, it has been apparent to me that the entire vaccine industry is all about profits and how they can make profits.
And what I talk about in my show, A Shot in the Dark, is there is a focus on giving children that are just born so many vaccines before the age of two, because before the age of two, children typically don't talk, right?
So it's very hard for parents to To successfully win a fight saying that this vaccine caused this injury to my child when your child hasn't had much development, meaning if you were giving that amount of vaccines as you give in the first couple years of a child's life to people that were 10 and between the ages of 10 and 12, you would be able to say, well, look how they're performing in school.
You can't tell me that my kid just suddenly stopped talking at the age of 10 and that it wasn't contributed to this vaccine that I just gave them, right?
You would be able to successfully argue, whereas now when you're talking about infants and they're six months, we just say the moms are crazy.
They're lying. They say, oh, my child was fine.
I gave them this vaccine. They ran a fever and they were never the same.
You're lying. My child was fine.
I put it in the crib after they got a set of vaccines and my child never woke up.
You're lying. It's a wonderful way to gaslight people when people can't communicate.
So when I read a headline and it says, That they are going to test vaccines on people that have Down syndrome because it's going to prevent them potentially from getting Alzheimer's in the future.
It instantly registers to me as something extremely sinister.
Why? Well, of course, Down syndrome varies, obviously.
It has different scales. People that have milder forms of Down syndrome and other people that have severe Down syndrome.
But what usually comes with that is an inability to recall certain things.
Obviously, you have a disability already, so it becomes hard to discern if that disability somehow worsens because of something that a doctor gave you.
Of course, it's a lot easier when the person is not able to communicate clearly.
Clearly, what has happened to them or what has gone on, you can't exactly track that as clearly as you would if you were giving, let's say, me an injection and I was saying, whoa, I was totally fine and now I've got this rash on my arm.
Or, you know, suddenly I'm ill and I'm dealing with things I've never dealt with.
I don't like the idea of experimenting on people that have Down syndrome.
Make no mistake, when you say that it is a trial and you are running tests, you are therefore acknowledging that this is, in fact, an experiment.
Now, to be super clear, we don't know how old these people are that they are going to extend this trial to in America.
It's curious. Switzerland.
Switzerland, okay? The country that brought us euthanasia And mercy killings, right?
They are the ones that first had the clinics.
You want to kill yourself? Come here.
Do you really believe that they are so concerned about individuals that are living with Down syndrome in America that Big Pharma is just so concerned about individuals living with Down syndrome?
Big Pharma, which supports the abortion industry, is so concerned about the possibility that people living with Down syndrome might develop Alzheimer's if they had decided, we want to help these people.
Do you believe that? Were you born yesterday?
Do you actually believe that they are looking at these people despite the fact that obviously dementia and Alzheimer's is widespread?
In fact, at least according to the Alzheimer's website, it says one in three seniors will die with Alzheimer's or dementia.
It kills more than breast cancer and prostate cancer combined.
And yet, despite these facts, despite the facts that there are 6 million Americans that are today living with Alzheimer's, they have decided that they are going to focus on trying to prevent individuals that have Down syndrome from getting Alzheimer's down the line.
Please tell me you don't believe any of that.
It is just, to me, giving me the sense that Big Pharma is doing what they have always done, which is experimenting on people that are the most vulnerable, people that cannot fend for themselves.
And the pitch is always that they're trying to help, when in fact we know the real pitch is that they are trying to increase profits.
It's a very... It's bizarre that they would start at first with people that have Down syndrome.
If you had something that could prevent Alzheimer's, let me tell you something right now.
Individuals that are billionaires, okay, and who have been searching for a cure to Alzheimer's and who perhaps think that they carry a gene for Alzheimer's would be the first to get their hands on it.
They would say, use us, please.
Experiment on us.
If this is really a vaccine that works, I want to make sure my children don't suffer from Alzheimer's because my grandfather suffered from Alzheimer's.
but no, that is not who they are believing.
That's not who they are beginning with.
They're beginning with our nation's most vulnerable.
Here's what will happen.
If successful, again, it's experiment, they are successful, further tests of the vaccine
will be carried out to see if it can prevent Alzheimer's in elderly people who do not have Down syndrome.
So if it's successful after the nation, which brought us euthanasia and mercy killings,
after they're done giving whatever it is to people that have Down syndrome,
they will move on to elderly people, people that if they want can call up Switzerland
and say, I no longer want to live anymore.
And Switzerland will help them through that process.
There are clinics in Switzerland that will talk them through that process, make sure that their financial affairs are in order, fly them out to Switzerland, and kill them.
Kill them. This is something that enrages me.
Again, it is the topic that I am the most passionate about when it comes to the ways in which people are being manipulated to believe that big pharma wants to help them when in fact it wants to hurt them.
There was no reason why this trial would begin in Switzerland and then it would be immediately expanded to the United States.
Why is it always the United States?
Because the United States government, in conjunction with the pharmaceutical execs, are greedy.
If there's a way that they can make a profit experimenting, if there's a way that they can see what the actual side effects of this drug will be without harming people that they feel could cause a potential uprising and communicate what happened to them.
They don't want to do that. Someone who is able to communicate, jump on an Instagram live and say, this is what happened to me when I took the vaccine, because then that requires more work on their part.
And they have to get into lockstep with Twitter and Facebook, a la the COVID vaccine, and start censoring speech.
So it's easier to go after people who have Down syndrome.
That's what I believe is happening here.
It is completely and utterly outrageous, and I will continue to speak out on all the evil that we are seeing today that is being produced by Big Pharma.
And that's all I'm going to say about that.
History was made on June 24, 2022 when a 50-year-old law was overturned in a landmark ruling.
This month we celebrate the one-year anniversary of the fall of Roe, but our work is not done.
Pre-born lives matter today and we need to make sure that they matter tomorrow too.
As we celebrate the one-year anniversary of the fall of Roe, let's continue to do our part.
Preborn's network of clinics exists exclusively to offer love, life, and support to pregnant women who are feeling scared, alone, or pressured to make the ultimate choice.
One that will not only sacrifice the life of their preborn baby, but also take a piece of their own heart.
So I was very highly influenced to go to Planned Parenthood.
So when I got there, I spoke to a nurse.
She told me that, well, you came here anyway, so maybe you should get the abortion.
It was influencing me because I kept saying, if it doesn't have a heartbeat or if it doesn't have this, you know, just trying to justify a lot of things that shouldn't have been justified.
What they make you do is they make you take the first pill with them.
She told me to put two in one cheek and two in this cheek and let it sit there for 30 minutes.
And all I could think of is you tasting death.
She told me to find my comfort zone, and it's hard to find a comfort zone when you're getting rid of your child.
As soon as I left the office, I started shaking, and I just was like, J-Bro, what did you do?
As soon as I got home, I seen my kids, and my kids said, Mommy, how's the baby?
And I just was like, how do you tell them, like, Mommy's not having a baby no more.
I was crying, I was shaking, and I'm looking through the papers, like, how do I stop this?
Like, what do I do? I was sobbing.
It was a cry for prayer for God.
I'm so sorry, please.
So I got on the internet, and I looked up, how can you stop an abortion from only taking the first pill?
And I just started seeing, like, abortion pill reverse.
Is this real? And I found a hotline number, so I'm like, Please, God, let me call this number, be real.
I called it and somebody actually answered the phone.
Miss, I really need help.
I mistakenly took a pill and I'm so scared.
I don't know what to do, please. I just was like panicking.
They get me started immediately on progesterone and told me everything.
Like, it's gonna be okay.
When I came here, my heart was so warm.
Somebody would go as hard as if it was their children to make sure your child is gonna be alive.
Stay safe. So I really want a lot of people to know it's possible.
You can save your baby.
You can reverse that abortion.
When a distressed mother comes to pre-born, she is welcomed with open arms and has offered a free ultrasound to hear and see the precious life that's growing inside of her.
The majority of the time, she will choose life.
We can all make a difference by donating $64 to honor the precious lives lost and to keep the lives of those at risk safe.
Every penny goes toward loving mothers and their babies.
To donate, dial pound 250 and say the keyword, baby.
All gifts are tax deductible.
You will never regret saving a defenseless baby's life.
That's pound 250, baby.
Or visit preborn.com slash Candice.
Okay, now it's time for some Topics du Jour.
Alright, speaking of Big Pharma, there has been a spotting of Jamie Foxx.
It feels like it's a spotting of Bigfoot because everyone has been sort of waiting with bated breath to hear a health update, obviously, just to sort of jog your memory.
We heard that Jamie Foxx had a medical condition.
Something happened. He was in the middle of filming a movie.
Perhaps he had a stroke.
He was hospitalized. We learned that it was severe.
His daughter then spoke out and said, unless it comes from the family, don't believe anything that you hear.
And then shortly thereafter, an independent journalist by the name of A.J. Benza went on Dr.
Drew Pinsky's podcast and gave a little more information regarding what he said was firsthand knowledge of the situation.
Take a listen. I had somebody in the room who let me know that Jamie had a blood clot in his brain after he got the shot.
He did not want the shot, but the movie he was on, he was pressured to get it.
What I found out from the man in the room was that the blood clot in the brain caused him at that point to be partially paralyzed and blind.
Yeah.
Yeah. My family would speak out and instantly say that none of this is true and we are going to pursue this journalist for spreading such bad information.
But none of that happened and we haven't heard anything from Jamie Foxx until now.
So first of all, I want to say I am happy that Jamie Foxx is doing well.
The first sighting of him down the Chicago River.
He took to Twitter for the first time since his hospitalization, and he said, And he was waving to fans as if he was in a parade.
He wasn't in a parade. He was just on a yacht going down the Chicago River.
You can take a look at that right here.
It's our birthday!
It's our birthday! Then even more footage of Jamie Foxx coming out of a car in Chicago.
So again, now there are all of these appearances of Jamie Foxx.
And there's one of two ways to look at this.
First and foremost, it doesn't mean that what A.J. Benza shared was inaccurate.
It also doesn't mean that it is accurate.
Obviously, we saw a slew of celebrities who had weird medical conditions, and we can't say they were related to the vaccine.
But case in point, Justin Bieber, we covered this on the show, his face suddenly went paralyzed and it was temporary.
He was able to regain facial movement, but not without having to suspend his tour because he quite literally suddenly had a bout of facial paralysis.
The same for his wife.
She suffered from a brain, a blood clot in her brain, which is terrifying.
talking about extremely young people who were going through very serious health scares all
during this time when all of these actors and singers and performers and models were
being required to get the vaccine. So again, I'm very happy that he seems to be doing better.
It seems like he is making a full recovery, but I remain hopeful that if there is any
veracity to the claims that AJ Benza made about what happened to Jamie Foxx, that Jamie
Foxx will in fact use his platform to speak out because the battle that we are facing
against big pharma, which has an insurmountable, it feels to be an insurmountable amount of
control or the information that we read via their various sponsors, people that they sponsor
in the media.
Obviously you see the amount of money that they are able to bring in and then give out
to journalists who are obviously being kept on their payroll. In my view, it's scary and
it's going to take someone having the courage, someone with a platform like Jamie Foxx to
really open up this conversation. Again, the other side of that potentially, maybe Jamie
Foxx, maybe AJ Benza was lying. Obviously he did have a medical condition. Maybe it
was not related at all to the vaccine. And Jamie Foxx is doing what Jamie Foxx has always
done. He's always been a remarkably private person. You know, he dated Katie Holmes and
didn't breathe one word about it. Maybe he just doesn't want to talk to the public about
what he actually went through. I am hoping that he will eventually come out. If not to
take on big pharma in the capacity that I have taken it on, then at the very least to
simply clarify that these rumors are true or they are not true.
So we will continue giving you updates on that story.
Moving on, you guys.
Interesting. So I have mocked many times the Californian Reparations Task Force because it should be mocked, first and foremost, because we have allowed Gavin Newsom to make Black Americans in the state of California believe that he was ever going to give them reparations.
It's just, it's so foolish.
It's ridiculous that Black Americans felt empowered enough to even show up to these meetings, believing that this is it.
The government's going to give me $10 million for being Black in a state that never had slaves.
And obviously the white people that are alive today didn't own the slaves.
The Black people that are alive today weren't the slaves.
So all of this is just the government keeping Black Americans busy, trying to secure their votes by making ridiculous promises.
We've talked about that. But an interesting conversation that they have now started, the Californian Reparations Task Force, is calling for the elimination of Black child support debt.
Now, at first glance, you might say that's absolutely ridiculous.
Why would we eliminate child support debt?
If you are a deadbeat baby daddy, why would the government have to pay for that?
Well, their argument, and it's a good argument, by the way, is the government caused the predicament, right?
They are asking for the state legislator to eliminate interest on past due child support,
as well as any back child support debt for black residents of the state.
In its final report released last week, they claimed that the laws were discriminatory
because it was the government that tore African American families apart.
And that is a fact.
The thing that is interesting is that they are asking the same people, a Democrat-controlled
The thing that is interesting is that they are asking the same people,
a Democrat-controlled state legislator, when it was in fact a Democrat-controlled Congress,
state legislator, when it was in fact a Democrat-controlled Congress, that initially brought about these
that initially brought about these policies.
policies.
A Democrat politician, Lyndon Baines Johnson, and his Great Society Act
A Democrat politician, Lyndon Baines Johnson, and his Great Society Act had destroyed black
that destroyed Black families with intention.
families with intention.
They knew what they were doing, incentivizing bad behavior.
They knew what they were doing.
Incentivizing bad behavior.
Black Americans were not wise to it, obviously.
Black Americans were not wise to it, obviously.
They believed, as people always believe, that the government wants to help
They believed, as people always believe, that the government wants to help and that the
and that the government really wanted to help Black women by making sure
government really wanted to help black women by making sure And that is a fact.
they didn't marry their Black fathers, and that they would give them money in the form of welfare
payments if they didn't marry their Black fathers.
And what do we see today?
We see a 78% single motherhood rate.
And when this first began, right before the passage of those laws,
the single motherhood rate for Black Americans was 23%.
So this, yes, is an epidemic that is being produced by government, which is why it's never going to be solved by government.
So it's a valid argument.
It's not a valid solution.
The argument deserves discussion amongst Black Americans because Black Americans should understand what welfare is and what it's always been intended to be.
Which is something that is meant to keep Black Americans back.
It is meant to keep Black Americans married to the government.
They don't want you marrying your spouses because they know that you will become so dependent on the state for your welfare checks that whenever it's threatened to take away, they can guarantee that you will vote according to keep those paychecks, which is why Democrats, of course, have seized the Black vote for over 60 years.
Anyways, I thought that was interesting to say the least.
Definitely worth discussing.
As is something that I wish I had never seen.
You know, it's not fair. I'm not even on TikTok because I'm aware that it's an online insane asylum.
And obviously, because it's an online insane asylum, I don't want to participate.
That's what it feels like. It feels like if you're walking in an insane asylum and you're looking in each room and looking at each patient and trying to figure out what it is that they're suffering from, that's how I feel about TikTok.
It's why I encourage people that watch this show to keep your children off of TikTok.
Well, it doesn't matter because these videos make their way.
They sort of leak over to Instagram, leak over to Facebook.
And I see them anyways, and I have to cover them on the show because it's a stern warning too.
Well, keep your kids off of TikTok.
Take this one TikToker as an example.
Her name is Jess. And let's just talk about her bio at first before I tell you what Jess is up to.
Jess says that she's having an awakening.
Her bio reads, My awakening journey began back in 2016.
I was, quote unquote, happily married, had a, quote unquote, great job, and an overall, quote unquote, happy life.
At a surface level, I was happy, but deep down, I was yearning for more.
I was unsettled. I was discontent.
I was anxious. I was a slave to chronic overthinking.
I couldn't stop thinking. There has to be more than this.
I couldn't stop asking, who am I? Why am I here?
What is my purpose? What is happiness?
How do I find peace? One day I realized that enough was enough and I needed to make some major changes in my life.
I took a leap into the unknown and walked away from my marriage and essentially my entire life as I knew it to embark on an intense journey of the soul, to heal, to discover myself, and to find meaning.
Fluffy, fluff, fluff, fluff, fluff, fluff, fluff.
You guys get it. You know where this is ending.
She's telling us that she had an awakening.
We can almost guarantee that means that she's having a mental breakdown.
And so what she has done is she's very interested in her menstruation.
And as one piece of this is that she's realized that the plants in which she grows want to also experience her menstruation.
So when she menstruates, She captures her menstruation.
I don't know how she does that.
And then she feeds her plants.
I'm sorry. I'm sorry.
I had to say it's you have to too.
Take a look. I am on my way to get my menstrual blood back to the earth and to my plants.
Did you know that menstrual blood is known to contain so many different amazing nutrients and minerals, such as nitrogen and potassium, which are essential for plant growth and development?
Throughout history, it has always been believed that a woman's menstrual blood is incredibly powerful and has the ability to help heal the land and promote the growth of healthy plants and crops.
This is a practice that has been around for a long time.
But I give my menstrual blood back to the earth and to my plants as a way of saying thank you and expressing my gratitude.
What can I say? What can I say?
Her husband dodged a bullet.
Could you imagine you divorced somebody?
You don't know how you feel about the divorce.
Then you go online to discover that they're capturing their menstruation blood and feeding it to their plants.
I just can't imagine how happy he is right now.
How happy and how free he is.
And I appreciate that at the end of this video she says she knows that And her plants are really happy about this.
I mean, where is PETA when you need them?
I just can't even imagine how disgusting her place must smell, how gross everything must be that is around her.
And again, her in-laws.
Someone is saying, I told you so, man.
I told you this woman was totally nutty and now she's down in South America spraying her plants with menstruation blood.
In closing, guys, TikTok is a mental insane asylum.
Keep your children far, far away.
All right, now let's get into some of your comments for episodes past.
You guys had a lot to say about my assessment of Jonah Hill and Kiki Palmer and just feeling like when men actually communicate, when men never communicate, when they actually communicate what they want and need a relationship, people call it misogyny.
Regarding Jonah Hill, MontanaGirl3835 says, I get having standards, but your standard can't really be you should quit your job right when you start dating.
That's how you ran into it.
I thought that because he said hanging with men and knowing that it has caused issues in our relationship before, that there was likely something that happened.
And this is why it's wrong for her to have shared these text messages without any context.
It was very clear that he had trust issues for some reason.
Even when he referred...
To her friends, and he said, if you need to hang out with friends that have caused you to make, I'm paraphrasing here, but that have caused you to make bad decisions in the past, outside of just going to do something normal, like going to get a cup of coffee, then I have an issue.
So that implies that what he was saying was, I don't want you drinking with those girls from a part of your past that have caused you to do bad things.
Very clearly, she has done stuff in the past that has made him not trust her, and with men.
And there could have been an incident, maybe she cheated on him, maybe She hooked up with one of the guys that she served with, but we never had that context, which is why it was so wrong for her to share those messages without it.
Next person writes, as a man, I'm eternally grateful for you, Candace, for speaking out for us.
As men, when we defend ourselves, we're dismissed as defending abuse and misogyny.
But when women start speaking out too, these crazy feminists go absolutely nuts because it
doesn't fit their narrative anymore. As a man, I feel afraid to speak out against what is happening,
so thank you once again. I do believe that the tides are finally changing and that men are not
being bullied anymore by the cultural acceptance of toxic feminism, which of course is not about
equality with men. It's about actually having power over men by simply saying, I'm a woman,
and therefore you have to listen or else you're a big bad bully. And I think that the Jonah Hill
circumstance, as well as Kiki Palmer's, I guess not fiance, her baby daddy's circumstance is proof
of that. Next person writes, in my opinion, her actions, this is regarding Kiki Palmer,
and outfit is disrespectful to her man. However, if he met her and dated her while she dressed
this way. That's on him. He chose her. Let me tell you why I disagree with that.
I think that your life changes, and so the way that you live your life before you're in a serious relationship, We're good to go.
So what you're saying is that, well, Candace, you know, was drinking in her 20s and she went out on Thursday, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday.
So it would be ridiculous for her husband, George, to be upset.
But now that she's a mother of two going on three, that she's still not allowed to go out on Thursday, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday.
No, you're looking at someone's circumstances and saying this behavior, which was once appropriate when we were this age and we were living in this way, is now no longer appropriate.
This is called maturation.
This is what happens when people mature.
And if you're unable to do that, it's not fair to say to your partner, well, this is who I was when I was 18, so what's the big deal?
You have to grow up.
That's kind of the point.
Michelle Oli writes, I've said that to myself way too much.
When a lady wears clothes like that, I'm covering my kids' eyes and I'm looking at my husband to give him a heads up.
Avoid that area. It's just disgusting.
I don't see why people think this is normal.
And yes, we live this life.
I don't even go with my family to the beach because of the exposure.
Standards should be held if we do go anywhere.
It's usually kid-friendly environments.
I don't want this stuff shoved down my kids' eyes.
My husband and I agreed when we got married we wouldn't have any opposite-sex friends or anything like that.
It's not a controlling thing. We just know we don't need a plus two to our marriage.
I feel sad for the guy to have to go through that.
It's interesting that you say that because I've heard of that and my grandparents were the same.
Like, my grandmother never went out and they were married for We're good to go.
And that gets back into the Jonah Hill thing where it's, yes, of course, when she was single, he expected this might have been her behavior, but then when they were coming together and this was somebody that he was thinking about, hey, am I going to marry this person?
Am I going to have a child with this person?
He wanted to see if her behavior would adapt, if she would rise to the level of what it means to be a good wife, right?
If she would rise to the level of what it means to be a good mother.
And guess what? Her answer was no.
And so was his. And he moved on and he found that person.
No harm, no foul, unless you're her and you can't get over it.
And with Kiki... Yes, I do not think it is ever acceptable to dress like that.
Least of all, going to a concert and grinding on a guy.
A lot of people had feedback.
Well, he's not the greatest guy either.
He's got another baby mama. He forced another girl to get an abortion.
All of that might be true.
And two things might be true at the same time.
He's absolutely right about the inappropriateness of Kiki Palmer's behavior as a mother and as somebody who he is seeing or dating, but also that he might not be a great person himself.
And that's why I said two wrongs don't make a right.
And that's all we have for you guys today.
Using the internet without ExpressVPN is like not paying attention to the safety demonstration on a flight.
Most of the time you'll probably be fine, but what if one day the yellow mask drops down from the overhead and you have no idea what to do?
It's better to be safe than sorry.
Every time you connect to an unencrypted network, any hacker on the same network can gain access to your personal data, such as passwords and your financial details.
ExpressVPN creates a secure, encrypted tunnel between your device and the internet so that hackers cannot steal your sensitive data.
I love that ExpressVPN works on my phone, computers, and tablets.
It's so easy to use.
You just fire up the app, click one button, and then you're protected.
Take charge of your digital security in one click.
ExpressVPN's best-in-class encryption keeps you safe and private on any network.
Secure your data today at expressvpn.com slash Candice.
That's E-X-P-R-E-S-S-V-P-N dot com slash Candice to get three months free.
Visit expressvpn.com slash Candice to learn more.
As a reminder, A Shot in the Dark is available on Daily Wire Plus, so be sure to click the link in the description and subscribe right now.
And I will see you guys tomorrow, still from France.