All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Feb. 12, 2026 - The Charlie Kirk Show
38:21
The Most Horrifying Video of 2026
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Roblox Sued Over Child Safety 00:09:44
My name is Charlie Kirk.
I run the largest pro American student organization in the country fighting for the future of our republic.
My call is to fight evil and to proclaim truth.
If the most important thing for you is just feeling good, you're going to end up miserable.
But if the most important thing is doing good, you will end up purposeful.
College is a scam, everybody.
You got to stop sending your kids to college.
You should get married as young as possible and have as many kids as possible.
Go start a turning point USA college chapter, go start a turning point USA high school chapter.
Go find out how your church can get involved.
Sign up and become an activist.
I gave my life to the Lord in fifth grade.
Most important decision I ever made in my life, and I encourage you to do the same.
Here I am.
Lord, use me.
Buckle up, everybody.
Here we go.
The Charlie Kirk Show is proudly sponsored by Preserve Gold, the leading gold and silver experts, and the only precious metals company I recommend to my family, friends, and viewers.
All right, welcome to the Charlie Kirk Show.
We are still in Palm Beach.
Well, I am, and Blake is holding it down in Phoenix, Arizona.
We want to start today's show by unpacking some of the newest details involving the trans shooter in Canada that left nine dead, including himself, as well as his stepbrother, a 12 year old stepbrother, and his mom, and then killing a bunch of kids and one teacher.
The kids were between 12 and 13.
It's just an absolutely excruciating story.
But some of the details that have emerged have been raising eyebrows just because they are so, I would say, troubling, demonic, frightening.
And we have to play this video because I think it sets the tone for what we're about to unpack now.
This is the alleged Canada shooter laughing maniacally.
And I want you to look at this video of this individual.
And then realize that instead of getting mental help or spiritual help, the officials in Canada instead decided to pour poison and drugs and more SSRIs down his throat.
For those who can't see it, he does makeup on like he's the Joker from The Dark Knight, like on his face, kind of like Heath Ledger from The Dark Knight.
It seems to be like cackling to himself.
And that's such a, it's an underrated, because they would basically censor it, a part of the radical transgender ideology.
So much of it is people who get lost in fictional worlds.
They want to become fictional characters.
One reason when people change their names, they tend to not just pick a feminine version of their original name, they'll pick like a totally new one, like they're creating a new character in a video game.
And that's one of something incredible that was found the other day, years ago.
Matt Walsh on his Twitter account posted something that had been posted on a Reddit thread about transgenderism.
And it was a user who's saying, How do I stop comparing myself to fictional characters?
And they go on, I am a trans MTF 15 year old.
I've been viewing a lot of anime related content I was never into before.
And he goes on about always relating himself to these anime characters.
And Matt Walsh posts this and basically saying, These people are not mentally well.
And everyone on the pro transgender Reddits flipped out at the time.
It went viral at the time.
And now here we are three years later.
And it appears the owner of that account is the young man who murdered two of his family members and then a bunch of innocent people at his own school.
Yeah.
And we have the video here with the sound.
And I wanted to play it with the sound because when you see this with the audio, I think it's even more impactful.
It's more terrifying.
469.
Yeah, absolutely.
Never play that video on this program again.
Oh my God.
Yeah, we will never do that again.
But I think it's important because these are the people that a certain contingent of the population, mostly radical progressives, are doing everything in their power to defend, to apologize for, to create avenues and protections, legal or otherwise, as opposed to getting them the help that they need.
You should have compassion on people that have mental health issues.
Those mental health issues.
But another wrinkle has emerged that this individual had a Roblox account.
And this is going to be a repeated theme on this show moving forward.
We're going to unpack what Roblox is.
And Blake is our resident gaming expert here.
But this is a Roblox account.
Well, but you probably know more about it than I do.
Belonging to the Canadian mass shooter, it was discovered by the internet forum Kiwi Farms last night.
One of the games created by the shooter is a mall shooting simulator.
A mall shooting simulator modeled after a real mall in Canada, where the player can fire into a crowd of innocent, helpless, terrified civilians.
So, this is what young kids can do on Roblox.
They can create simulations.
They can create their own worlds that they can then act out these fantasies.
I think this is interesting because actually, the Kentucky Attorney General is actually suing Roblox and is citing the assassination of Charlie as one of his inspirations for doing this because he's saying that the gaming platform is violating child safety.
By giving them the opportunity to create these simulations where they can shoot ICE officers, where they can shoot DHS officers, where they can, in this instance, create a simulation where they're attacking innocent civilians at a mall modeled after a mall.
So if you think this through, you realize that they could be creating an entire map for how they can game out an actual attack on civilians.
So they're creating the map in their head so that they could, in theory, follow through on an actual shooting.
Based on the actual layout of a mall in this instance, or any other public space, any other soft target.
So that's the Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman.
And the gaming platform has 111 million active monthly users.
And he's alleging that it lacks guardrails to protect kids and creates a playground for pedophiles to meet potential victims, which is another weird wrinkle in this Roblox story.
So you've got a whole gaming platform that now we know that this kid was on Reddit.
He was talking about his trans fascination on Reddit.
He was creating Roblox simulations where he was doing mass shootings.
And then he actually ends up going and doing it and shooting his mom, shooting his stepbrother, shooting a bunch of kids and a teacher.
And meanwhile, the Canadian officials, we talked about this yesterday, went out of their way to protect the identity and the privacy of the shooter.
Out of privacy concerns, they refused to acknowledge at first that this was a trans person that shot up everybody in Canada.
Yeah, well.
Think about that.
The absolute upside down nature of their value system that they would care about the privacy of a mass murderer.
Go ahead, Blake.
Yeah, well, so yeah, they kept it a secret, basically.
It almost felt like just long enough to, like, okay, we have to push this past the first day.
And then, you know, they ultimately can't keep it secret who did a massacre like this.
On the Roblox topic, it's you don't want to fixate on the specific game, though it is true, a ton of people are in it.
It's hugely popular.
But you also find these people in Minecraft, you find them in similar games.
And you'll also see people, we saw this with Charlie, where people are going in Discords.
Discord started as a gaming server for people to discuss games, but now there's a million Discords dedicated to.
Political radicalism.
It's dedicated to transgender topics.
They radicalize each other on these forums.
And I think the big picture thing to be aware of like, if you're a parent right now, if you're a parent right now, you have to realize there are gigantic online worlds that it's very easy for your children to get sucked into and have it just totally take over their life.
If you don't know who your children are talking to online, you have to be aware very dark things could be going on.
And it's not that you need to police everything you do, but you should be talking to them.
Who are your friends online?
And make sure they have friends online.
Offline as well.
If they're just marinating in this soup of whatever is reaching them on the internet all alone with no input from real people around them, incredibly dark things can be unfolding.
Compassion Meets Cruelty in Debt 00:08:41
And as parents, you have a responsibility to be aware of that.
Fantasies lead to realities, and for goodness sakes, do not shove SSRIs down their throats when they're dealing with severe mental illness.
If you're stressed about getting out of debt, it's go time.
Seriously, this is one of those moments where timing actually matters.
Done with Debt is one of the best I've seen at navigating debt relief.
2025 was a record year.
They enrolled over $102 million in debt for our listeners and others.
Here's why I'm telling you about this now, though.
According to the Federal Reserve's latest survey, many banks have tightened their standards.
Right now, may be the best window to negotiate settlements before lenders tighten further.
Done with Debt tracks credit card and loan company behavior.
This is what they know.
They're experienced at knowing who is negotiating and when, and what it takes to get you the biggest reduction possible.
And whether you're carrying $10,000 or $500,000 in debt, this is probably the best chance you'll get all year.
Done with debt are legendary negotiators when you go head to head with your credit card and loan companies.
They have one goal to drastically reduce or eliminate your debt altogether.
Most clients see more money in their pocket month one.
Do not wait for the lenders to tighten up their policies.
Here's what you need to do schedule a free consultation.
There's no pressure, and it only takes a few minutes.
Share who you owe.
And they'll tell you if this is the moment you could see a major reduction in your debt.
Imagine waking up without that weight on your shoulders and doing it without taking out another loan or filing for bankruptcy.
Done with debt helps you through the debt relief process so you keep more of your paycheck every month.
Go to donewithdebt.com right now.
That's donewithdebt.com.
Real quick here there is a graph going around.
We're working on confirming it.
There isn't any listed sources.
But Blake probably just put up a great tweet yesterday documenting all the recent shootings that involve trans people.
And so, at least directionally, this graph feels accurate.
So, go ahead and throw up 448.
It's mass shootings by demographic, 2015 to 2025.
And these are public incidents with four or more fatalities expressed as rates per million of the population.
Trans, non binary, biological male.
Tops the list per capita of mass shootings.
Trans, non binary, biological female comes in second than Asian men, black men, white men, Asian women, Hispanic men.
Now, again, we're working on confirming the source, but it's hard to argue when you look back, even just at recent history, when you look back at what even happened with Charlie, although the Charlie Shooter was not a trans individual himself.
He had a relationship with somebody that was trans and had gender identity, whatever.
And so this is a rising epidemic, a problem where we give drugs, mental drugs, mental health drugs, SSRIs, et cetera, hormone therapy.
To the most mentally unstable people in our population.
And it needs to stop.
It should be, frankly, illegal what they're doing to young people.
And, Blake, do you have that list of recent shootings, school shootings, church shootings involving trans individuals?
I don't have it in front of me, but I can remember a lot off the top of my head.
We have the Covenant School shooter.
That was a biological female, but still a trans case.
There was one at a school in Colorado, I think, in 2017.
There were two shooters, but one was transgender.
There was the Annunciation Catholic in Minneapolis just a matter of months ago.
In fact, just.
Days before what happened to Charlie.
And of course, we have Charlie's own case, which is adjacent.
And now this.
And it's not that there's a huge number of them by volume, but overall, there's not, thankfully, there's not that many spree killers overall.
And there's not that many transgender people.
They're probably under 1% of the population, even with young people.
And so to have four or five of them just in a sequence of a matter of years, it really does stand out.
And I don't think that's going to be the last we're going to see of it because we, we, Took this insane cocktail of people who are deeply troubled, and instead of getting them help, we've told them actually your delusions should be indulged.
And if people are not indulging them, they're trying to commit genocide against you.
And rationally, how do you respond to people trying to commit genocide against you?
And just fed all of these lies about how they should view this, how they should act, and then supercharged with any number of drugs, hormones, SSRIs.
The shooter in Tumblr Ridge, he was apparently taking.
Like over 200 milligrams a day of Zoloft when 25 is the one you start with, and I think 200 is the absolute maximum.
So, super dosing on this and on a bunch of other drugs as well.
Shocker, it blew up in everyone's faces, and I don't think this will be the last one we see.
No, I agree, but this is a larger theme of Democrat or if you want to just say progressive left wing compassion gone awry.
They do this at the border, they think that letting in millions of people at the border is compassion, then it leads to lots of dead Americans, it leads to carnage in the streets.
Commercial trucks getting into mass fatality accidents on our highways.
It is the complete opposite of compassion.
It's actually cruelty to the American citizen.
It's cruelty to the, in this case, to the Canadian citizen.
When you absolutely defy nature, when you defy law and order, when you defy the natural order, it ends in these absolute catastrophes.
And that's one of the themes of Democrat compassion.
They'll always label or put a veneer of compassion.
On some of the cruelest, most obscene, most crass, most absurd policies or positions that they take in the public space.
And they need to be called out again and again and again because real people are getting hurt.
And by the way, this young man should have been helped.
He should have been dealt with with compassion and with honesty, with sincerity.
But the left creates a Ideological prison around normal people that they cannot navigate out of.
They're not equipped to navigate out of it.
And they get stuck in these ideological cul de sacs where even this mother, who apparently was sort of a right leaning libertarian type person, posted on her social media that we shouldn't be attacking marginalized people.
And with a, Blake, correct me if I'm wrong.
It was a picture on her social media with like a trans flag or a LGBTQ flag.
Exactly.
She had the language of compassion sort of takes over these people's brains and they interpret compassion as.
Endless enabling.
So, we enable the delusions of people who think they're the opposite sex.
We enable people to, for example, like people who shouldn't be in this country who aren't qualified for jobs.
We help them get into jobs that they should not be working because they are not qualified for them.
They are not capable of them.
And we enable addicts to get drugs.
We enable the homeless to wreck communities.
And this is cruelty to the individuals themselves.
Like, I don't think this trans shooter, it didn't work out well for him that he was enabled endlessly.
It doesn't work out well.
For people who are working the wrong job and they end up killing people, they end up going to jail.
And it doesn't work out for anyone in society when we wreck our cities, when we wreck our public spaces, when we wreck our institutions.
It is fake compassion.
Real compassion requires sometimes making hard choices.
This young man probably should have been in an institution somewhere, somewhere that he could get help and at the least where he couldn't hurt himself or other people.
And instead, nine people are dead and 25 injured.
There's also a harrowing story of a 12 year old that was shot in the head, and she's still surviving, and we pray for her and her family.
Just a terrible situation all the way around.
If you knew Charlie Kirk, you knew this.
He was a connector.
Charlie believed in finding good people and connecting them with other good people that he cared about.
When someone truly took care of him, Charlie would never hesitate to recommend them.
Andrew Del Rey and Todd Avakian were two of those people.
They personally helped Charlie and Erica with their mortgage needs, and Charlie trusted them completely.
Whether it was a homebuyer trying to qualify or someone needing to consolidate debt or see if they could get a lower rate in payments, these were the guys Charlie sent people to.
Voter ID and Election Integrity 00:15:30
And right now, timing is Matters.
The market has shifted and rates have come down.
There's more inventory, bidding wars have cooled, and buyers finally have more control.
But that window won't stay open forever.
As rates come down, competition will return.
That's why being prepared now is so important.
Andrew and Todd at Union Home Mortgage bring over 40 years of combined experience and guide you through the process clearly.
No pressure, no guesswork.
These are the people Charlie trusted, and they're the people you can count on.
Reach out today to get approved for mortgage financing with Andrew and Todd at AndrewandTodd.com or call 8888172.
With 40 years of experience, they really are the experts and they make it easy because they keep everything in house.
Call 888 881172 or go to andrewandtod.com.
That is andrewandtod.com.
Without further ado, Congressman Chip Roy, welcome back to the Charlie Kirk Show.
Sir, there's been so much news on the SAVE Act.
Can you give our audience an update where we are at now?
Yeah, great to be on with you guys.
Appreciate it.
And I appreciate your attention to this important issue.
You know, I introduced the SAVE Act in its original form in 2024, working with Senator Mike Lee, who was the sponsor in the Senate.
You guys know this.
We worked with Cleta Mitchell, who's one of President Trump's great lawyers with America First Legal, built a great product that was focused on the citizenship angle, right?
Ensuring that we had a process when people were going through their registration in the future, that there were processes for them to demonstrate citizenship, and importantly, for states to check their voter rolls against citizenship data.
Which they're currently prohibited from doing under federal law.
I'll come back to that in a minute.
So we fixed that.
But then enter voter ID.
We thought about putting voter ID with it two years ago, but we decided to keep it really simple, focus on citizenship.
So we passed it.
What happened?
Senate blocked it.
Even though we had four Democrats, five, I'm sorry, five join us last Congress.
We reintroduced it this Congress.
We had four Democrats join us, but it wasn't moving in the Senate because we knew that Democrats would block it.
So we've been having this debate and we said, let's add voter ID.
The president likes.
The branding of Save America.
Let's put those two together.
Let's pass that out of the House, send it to the Senate.
And with the great work of Scott Pressler, of a whole bunch of organizations, you guys, everybody else keeping the heat up, we've now got it out of the House.
We passed it through last night, had one Democrat join us, so it's still bipartisan.
It's over in the Senate.
And now Mike Lee, Scott Pressler, and others are working it hard.
And I think I just saw on Twitter or on X that 48, I think now, senators have signed on to the Save America Act, leaving only five in question.
McConnell and Murkowski have indicated they may not support it on federalism grounds, which I think is fake.
And this totally honors federalism in the Constitution.
So that's the current state of play.
Now we just got to figure out what they do in the Senate.
Yeah.
So explain you brought up two points the federalism angle, as well as, well, let's start there federalism angle, because the issue is that the Constitution gives the states the rights to the time and the place of their elections, right?
So this is kind of the angle.
What is your argument and your retort to that?
Yeah, first of all, hard to find somebody who has stood up over their life to defend states more than myself and Mike Lee, right?
We're two of the most ardent federalists up here.
When I was the first assistant attorney general in Texas, we were fighting against federal overreach.
I wrote a book with Rick Perry about federalism.
I served at the Texas Public Policy Center's 10th Amendment Center.
So I love federalism.
However, what we're talking about here is something that has very clear purview in the Constitution for us.
Stop for a minute and consider elections.
Federally, we set elections in November, right?
We don't tell states that they have to run their state elections on the same day, but they do.
That's basically what we say we're doing here.
We're setting the guardrails around things under the power of the Constitution, under the Elections Clause, under a number of the amendments that walk through, including the 14th Amendment and a whole bunch of others, that give us power, but in particular, power over dealing with the elections when it's our elections, Congress and the presidency.
It does say the states do the time, place, and manner.
But it also then says Congress can come in and do it too, explicitly in the Constitution.
So we generally defer to the states.
Like we're not telling them where the polling places have to be.
We don't tell them that their state elections have to be on a certain date, but we're saying for the federal elections, do them in November for the general election.
And now we're adding these components.
Hey, we just want to guarantee citizenship.
And the last thing, we're freeing up states to do what they want to do, but are prohibited from doing now.
So it's pro federalism.
Arizona has two ways of electing.
You guys know Arizona well.
Arizona checks citizenship for state and local, but is prohibited from doing it for federal.
So they have to run two systems and they don't check the data on federal because they're not allowed to.
The SAVE Act fixes that.
The SAVE America.
Explain that.
Yeah.
Explain the prohibition on checking citizenship on the federal level.
Where does that come from?
What law is that?
And what does it actually look like when it's enforced or in action, rather?
Yeah.
So the NVRA passed in the 90s, I can remember the acronym, National Voter Registration Act, whatever, NVRA.
That had a clause in there that was interpreted by courts, I think wrongly, but it was interpreted that way to say that the states were allowed to take their voter rolls, so, say, Arizona, take that, their list, and go, hey, we want to check that against what's called the SAVE system.
It's why we call this the SAVE Act, the SAVE system, which is the system where we have our citizenship data and make sure those are aligned.
The court said you can't do that.
So we set out to fix that.
Then we added to it additional requirements.
It says the next time you register, if you're already registered, you can go vote.
The next time you register, you move, you change your name, then you got to go and say, look, I can prove my citizenship.
Here's how I do it.
Maybe that's the state sets up a system, check roles using real ID or whatever they're doing.
Maybe it's passport.
Maybe it's your regular driver's license plus a birth certificate.
We set up other ways we give the state flexibility.
But that's what that's all about.
Check the roles, get it right.
I would argue that's deferential to states.
That's helping states do what most of them want to do.
And by the way, on the voter ID piece, 30, I think, five states, 36, 36 states have voter ID.
So we're just trying to align all of that so that all of our federal elections operate in the same framework voter ID, citizenship, and then the states are still free to set their times, where the polling is in a school, community center, wherever it is.
Well, so I want to react to something.
So, President Obama has chimed in.
He's saying Republicans are still trying to pass the Save Act, a bill that would make it harder to vote and disenfranchise millions of Americans.
Join Redistrict Act and tell your member of Congress to vote no.
And then I couldn't help but see this beautiful clip with Scott Jennings on CNN last night where chaos erupts.
I don't know if you saw this, Congressman, but it's a phenomenal clip.
I'll get your reaction on the other side 437.
He is actually championing a bill that actually would take Voting rights away from a lot of black people in this country.
Wait, what voting rights is he taking away from black voters?
Oh, if we look at the Save Act, that's exactly what we're talking about.
That is actually going to continue to disenfranchise overwhelmingly a lot of people of color.
There are so many civil rights organizations that have run the data.
If we look at the way that it is going to disenfranchise black voters, it's the same reason why Chuck Schumer called it Jim Crow 2.0.
This is the same president.
If we want to continue.
Jim said, how yet?
76% of black voters think.
We should show an ID to vote.
80% of Hispanic voters, 83% of the American people.
Are you saying that black voters should be dumb to know what's good for them?
I mean, it sounds pretty condescending, I think.
So, Abby Phillips comes in later and she says, Well, you know, the SAVE Act isn't about that.
You got to like, most people don't have their birth certificate.
Most people don't have, you know, a passport.
What's your reaction to that pushback, Congressman?
Well, first of all, good for Scott Jennings.
He's doing the right thing and pushing back, and he's making the right points, right?
But I'll make one additional point.
And using an example, and I can't remember who it was and what show did it, but somebody went out in the field and interviewed people in New York about this issue last year, I think it was.
And I've seen this out in social media.
And they asked a bunch of white liberals in Manhattan, and they said, Hey, isn't it racist?
Don't you have a problem with this?
It'd be a real problem with voter ID and these kind of rules.
And all of these white liberals said, Oh, yeah, it's terrible.
Black people, and they don't know where the DMV is, they don't often have ID, they don't have a computer, they can't get on the internet, you know, all this stuff.
Then they went up into Harlem.
And above Manhattan, and they interviewed some black Americans in Harlem and said, Hey, do you know where the DMV is?
Yeah, it's up on 128th and whatever.
Do you have an ID?
Yeah, I have an ID.
Do you use the internet and have a computer?
Yeah.
I mean, it's absurd.
It's the height of racism and condescension that these nanny state white liberals want to tell everybody how they can do things, and they say, Oh, well, you can't.
Look, I actually think the least functioning people in America are these white liberals that have been coddled all the way through their ridiculous, pampered education.
And they don't really know how to function in a normal society.
On the core issue of the SAVE Act and the voter ID, the polling is obvious.
People support it.
We worked very hard to give flexibility to states to allow this all to work.
So let's take the women's issue.
They say, well, women aren't going to be able to vote because their name changed.
First of all, it's a tiny fraction of the population who have changed, got married, their name's different, and they haven't already done all of the stuff they have to do for anything else they need.
But in that environment, we added a provision that says if you go and you have a conflict with your voter ID, you can cast a provisional ballot, sign an affidavit, and say, my name is Jennifer Smith, and I changed it to Jennifer Jones, right?
And you can sign that affidavit under penalty perjury and vote.
So you can do things that are common sense.
And the same act when we talk about proving citizenship, we have lots of different ways to do that and allow you to use lots of different forms of identification, and you can get a free copy of your birth certificate.
If you're down to that piece of the process.
So it is not a hybrid.
It's ridiculous.
Yeah, it's obscene.
I mean, I find the whole thing laughable how they're twisting themselves into pretzels to try and defend this, calling it, it's going to disenfranchise millions.
Yeah, it's going to disenfranchise millions of illegals and foreigners who shouldn't be voting in our election.
Hi, folks.
Andrew Colvett here.
I'd like to tell you about my friends over at Y Refi.
You've probably been hearing me talk about Y Refi for some time now.
All in with these guys.
If you or someone you know is struggling with private student loan debt, take my advice and give them a call.
Maybe you're behind on your payments.
Maybe you're even in default.
You don't have to live in this nightmare anymore.
Y Refi will provide you a custom payment based on your ability to pay.
They tailor each loan individually.
They can save you thousands of dollars and you can get your life back.
We go to campuses all over America and we see student after student who's drowning in private student loan debt.
Many of them don't even know how much they owe.
Why Refi can help.
Just go to YRefi.com.
That's the letter Y, then Refi.com.
And remember, YRefi doesn't care what your credit score is.
Just go to YRefi.com and tell them your friend Andrew sent you.
We are with Chip Roy, Congressman from Texas, the great state of Texas.
He's also running for Attorney General.
So I wanted to keep him on for one more segment because a big part of the news today is that explosive hearing with Attorney General Pam Bondi.
You were part of that hearing.
Chip, so I'm excited to get your perspective on it.
There's a lot of news that's come out of it.
Let's go ahead and play an interaction you had with her that was related to our last segment, 440.
Am I correct that under your leadership, the Department of Justice has prosecuted cases of non citizen voting?
So it's false, as some of my Democratic colleagues have claimed, that it doesn't happen.
Yes.
I ask that today because we're voting on the Save America Act today to enact common sense policies to ensure only American citizens vote in American elections and enact federal voter ID laws.
But it's true, for example, that in just this month, A federal grand jury in Newark indicted two men with illegally voting in federal election and making false statements.
Muhammad Mazamal and Muhammad Shaquille were non citizens at the time they registered to vote.
This happens, it happens regularly, and you're prosecuting those crimes, correct?
Yes.
But does that prosecution of those criminals overturn their previously cast votes?
That's all pending.
But it does not overturn votes that they've cast, right?
So passing the same Act would help deal with that problem.
Yes, Congressman.
So there was a good interaction for her, but it was an explosive hearing.
Now you are a Turning Point Action endorsed candidate for Attorney General in the great state of Texas.
We're honored to be behind you, back you 100% of the way there, Congressman.
And everybody can support Chip's campaign.
Please chip in if you can, pun intended, I suppose.
Chiproy.com, Chiproy.com.
I think you're going to do a great job down there.
But so, you know, that was good.
But she, I mean, she's got a tough job, Congressman.
I mean, she had this interaction with Thomas Massey about the Epstein files.
Maybe just unpack how you see all that playing out.
It was some of the victims had their names were not redacted, but some of the co conspirators were redacted.
I mean, listen, I know this is weird waters to wade into, but the floor is yours.
Well, no, I appreciate it.
And first of all, I'm going to take it in series if I have a few minutes.
One, it was a very, you know, explosive hearing.
Democrats were going after her combatively, trying to attack her on the basis of what the situation is on the Epstein matter, rather than going through it logically and sort of calmly to get and elicit, I think, questions on a tough subject.
And when I got to my questions with the attorney general, I focused on a handful of things.
I wanted to set the groundwork on other issues like voter fraud, and I also talked about the extent to which they are eliminating backlogs in their immigration judges, their hearings of asylum, and all those things.
Important stuff as a baseline to show.
They're stopping crime.
They're stopping illegal aliens when they're working with DHS with their judges.
They're working to stop voter fraud.
They're doing a lot of great work.
Crime's going down.
So the baseline is America's better and safer.
But Epstein is a real issue.
We're all concerned about these power brokers and what Epstein himself did.
But I focused this way I said, one true or false, President Trump, his administration is the one that actually indicted Epstein.
Answer true.
It was President Trump's administration that indicted Jelaine Maxwell.
True.
Those two are in jail because of the first Trump term.
President Trump says, hey, we want to know all the files on this stuff.
So what happens?
Over the last year, a lot of files have gotten out.
Democrats politicized it and they wanted to push for more information.
Well, guess what?
I want to see more information.
I bet you guys want to see more information.
We don't want these power brokers to abuse underage women in a sex trafficking ring.
It's disgusting.
So the question is how?
Texas AG Pushes for Truth 00:04:22
When Congress passed the law that my friend Thomas and these other guys pushed, they did a discharge petition.
We were concerned, a lot of us, that it wasn't tightly drafted enough to ensure that victims would be protected.
So I asked the Attorney General, Bobby, I said, is it not true that we pushed to try to make that a better demand?
If Congress was going to insert itself into the prosecutorial function, which is a questionable thing to do, but you want to do it to get more information, shouldn't we have been tighter about that?
And I said, so why did you guys?
And I asked her a pointed question.
Why did you basically out some of the Jane Doe's, some of these women who were abused?
We didn't want their names out.
That was not supposed to happen.
So I pushed on her about it.
And she basically admitted we were getting 3 million files out and we didn't get it all done right.
So we're fixing it.
And when we saw some, we're fixing it.
Now, that may not be a good excuse.
I don't know.
We can debate that.
But I wanted it to be honest and open.
Last point I pushed on this question If Jelaine Maxwell was convicted for trafficking in young girls and underage girls, was it just Epstein?
Or are there others?
In other words, are you going to indict or go after anybody else?
And I was the only one that pressed her to the point to say, and she said, we have ongoing investigations on individuals that they're going to pursue further on that subject.
So look, I think they're trying to go after and seek the truth.
We have a job to push.
I'm going to try to go look at the files this afternoon.
I was going to fly home, but I could only get a spot because of the hearing and the SABAC this afternoon.
So I'm going to go over to DOJ and look at some of this stuff.
But we're trying to seek the truth wherever it may lead.
The attorney general is doing a good job stopping crime.
And I think it was a bunch of political show by Democrats trying to score political points, not actually for truth.
Yeah, and I would give her really good marks on some of her pushback, like, why didn't you do this during Biden?
You know, it's obviously a political football that they just see an opportunity now to take advantage of.
So I think that was high marks.
I think she unfortunately went a little off the rails with this, you know, mentioning the Dow Jones being over $50,000 and SP almost at $500 or $7,000.
I thought that was unfortunate.
It was kind of an unforced error there.
But to be fair to her, she's getting peppered with all these very belligerent questions again and again and again.
And I'm glad to hear that because I actually didn't see that clip.
Chip, about you, she confirmed to you that there's ongoing investigations about the co conspirators, right?
That's been a big thing on X this week that Les Wechner is now, you know, one of the files had him listed as a co conspirator.
Obviously, that's the Victoria's Secrets guy out of Ohio that gave power attorney to Epstein.
Listen, Chip, in the last minute that we have here, you are running for Attorney General of Texas.
What are your big issues, your plank issues that you're running on?
I know you're an immigration hawk like me.
That's one of the big reasons why I am very proud to support you.
But what are your big issues?
One minute left.
Yeah, I mean, one, absolutely the border.
We have to ready ourselves for the fact that President Trump's not going to be there forever.
We had him before, and then we got Biden and Majorcas, and our borders were exploited, and Americans were getting killed, and fentanyls pouring into our communities.
So we need an AG who's going to fight that and knows how to do it.
I've been winning up here on that subject.
I got to take that to Texas.
Number two, we've got to stop the Islamification of Texas.
I held a hearing two days ago where we had great witnesses who came in and talked about what was going on, founded the Sharia Free America Caucus with my fellow Texan Keith Self.
We're elevating that issue.
But we need to go to war on that when we're in Texas.
I want to get criminals off the streets, stop putting them out there with these ridiculous DAs and judges.
You got to have an AG who's been there, who's been in the courtroom, who knows the AG's office, who's unassailably conservative and can get the job done.
God's put me in that position.
I survived cancer.
I want to go out to Texas, save my state for my kids.
You know what you need to do in Texas?
You need to get these county prosecutors more in alignment with the AG's office, though.
You guys, people don't realize that Texas has the largest conservative.
Attorney's General team in the country.
So it's a huge, huge, especially if we get a Democrat back in the White House.
We need Texas to be strong.
Chip Roy, thank you.
God bless you, sir.
We'll talk to you again soon.
For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to charliekirk.com.
Export Selection