THOUGHTCRIME Ep. 55 — Nervous Kamala's First Interview
After a month of hiding, Kamala Harris emerged to give her first unscripted interview, supported by her emotional support animal, Tampon Tim Walz. The Thoughtcrime crew went live to discuss Kamala's interview immediately after, hitting upon what they think Kamala's fatal vulnerability might be: She's anxious, unstable, and too unprepared to be president — and she knows it. Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Our thought crime goes through Kamala Harris's sit-down interview.
We go through it word by word, piece by piece.
The big interview with her chaperone, Tim Walz.
Become a member today.
Members.CharlieKirk.com.
That is Members.CharlieKirk.com.
And get involved with Turning Point USA at TPUSA.com.
That is TPUSA.com.
Turning Point USA is the place for you to get engaged and get involved.
Turning Point USA.
TPUSA.com.
Buckle up, everybody.
Here we go.
Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks!
I want to thank Charlie.
He's an incredible guy.
His spirit, his love of this country.
He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA.
We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
That's why we are here.
Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of The Charlie Kirk Show, a company that specializes in gold IRAs and physical delivery of precious metals.
Learn how you could protect your wealth with Noble Gold Investments at noblegoldinvestments.com.
That is noblegoldinvestments.com.
It's where I buy all of my gold.
Go to noblegoldinvestments.com.
Okay, ThoughtCrime Thursday.
A little delayed tonight because we wanted to see and react to the Kamala Harris interview, which was supposed to be all this pent-up interest in a single interview.
She should be doing these once a day.
It's ridiculous.
I think we have Blake.
Jack is trying to come in.
We want to have immediate reaction here, though.
Your reaction, she's not good at this.
Speaking and talking, she's a nervous wreck.
And you can see why they've been hiding her for quite some time.
Can't believe I'm saying this.
I thought Dana Bash did a good job.
I thought she was far more clear and fair in her follow-up than I would have anticipated.
But you're looking at this as an independent swing voter for Kamala Harris.
She doesn't seem strong.
She doesn't seem poised.
She's flailing her hands all over the place.
Blake, your reaction to the much-awaited interview with Kamala Harris?
Yeah, Charlie, I think the one that stood out to me the most, and it looks like it stood out to a few other people, I saw some tweets to this effect online, including some from liberals, is when Dana asks her, what will you do day one of your presidency?
That's a common question.
They asked that of every single presidential candidate going back years.
Obama had a day one agenda, all these things.
And they ask it to her, and she doesn't have an answer.
She starts blathering, like, my first, my day one objective will be to help the middle class.
That's not an answer, Charlie.
That's not a thing you can do.
You know, you can say, I'll do this executive order, that executive order.
I'll reverse this or that policy.
Trump has an answer to that question.
Other candidates have answers to that question.
And she freezes up and just is like, I'm gonna do good things when I'm president.
And admittedly, there's a bit of awkwardness because of the other things she has to deal with, which is you are already in an administration right now, so anything she promises to do day one is something that Biden could do now and why isn't he?
But it was jarring she didn't have a better answer to that.
It was jarring how There was a lot of word salad in her answers.
I think her answer when they asked her about, like, Israel-Gaza, she says, like, a deal is necessary not just to end it, but to unlock what will come after.
It was just a very...
And I'll say the only thing that surprised me that she didn't really need to lean on Tim Walls as much as I thought like I kind of thought he might swoop in there to help supplement and answer at some point but that didn't happen and I think probably they calculated if he did that it would get really seized upon so he did just sit there being the emotional support Tim Walls the whole time except when they asked him directly so that was probably the one big upside but it did it was not as strong as she would have wanted I think.
So I'm here at WhiteHouse.gov.
What a better journalist should do next time, and she hopefully will sit down for another interview, but this might be it, is, well Kamala, your administration did the following things on your first day.
According to WhiteHouse.gov, you stopped border wall construction.
This is literally on WhiteHouse.gov.
Bipartisan majorities in Congress refused in 2019 to fund Trump's plan for a massive border wall, even after he shut down the government over this issue.
He then wastefully diverted billions of dollars to that construction.
By proclamation, Joe Biden will today declare an immediate termination of the National Emergency Declaration that was used as a pretext to justify some of the funding diversions to the wall.
The proclamation directs an immediate pause in wall construction, protects to allow a closer view of the legality of the funding and contracting methods used, and to determine the best way to redirect those funds.
That's number one.
Number two, there's an executive order here about preventing a discrimination of having trans people in the military.
Do you still support that, Kamala Harris?
Of course she does.
And then finally, getting rid of the Keystone XL pipeline.
Blake, you know, this is from your reach in the world.
Day one, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris signed an executive order getting rid of the Keystone XL pipeline.
And so these are very simple questions of day one, because she's already had a day one.
And that's what's such a misleading component of this.
Your day one was in January of 2021.
I'm gonna get Jack Posobiec in here.
Jack, welcome to your own show.
Jack, your reaction, your thought here to the Kamala Harris-Tim Walz conversation.
Yeah, Charlie, look.
She didn't do what she needed to do.
She came across as someone who studied just before she went to the tests, to the oral exam.
This came across as non-presidential.
This didn't come across as someone who's inspiring millions of people that she should be.
Among all the 300 plus million, depending on whether or not the SAVE Act gets passed, people that are going to be in the country come this election day, She is the one who's most important.
She's the one who should lead us.
She's the one that should deal with all of these thorny issues that we have facing us as a country.
This is the person.
There was nothing in this interview.
It was basically, it felt like she was treading water the entire interview.
She seemed frustrated to be there.
She came across as completely inauthentic.
And it's sort of like, oh, you survived, like you made it to the last round without getting knocked out.
Is that really someone that we want as our president who struggles through a CNN interview?
And not to get into specifics, but that is my overall 50,000 foot view take, is that
this wasn't at the level of where it needs to be for a presidential candidate, nor would
it have been for anyone had they actually gone through a primary on the Democrat side.
Gavin Newsom would have been better than this.
Gretchen Whitmer would have been better than this.
Josh Shapiro would have been better at this.
But Kamala Harris, she just doesn't have it.
Yeah.
And let's just make sure everyone is clear here.
The bar is set so unbelievably low that there was all this expectation as if Kamala Harris was sitting down for an interview, like the interview to beget all interviews.
I mean, Blake, the lead-up to this was like Frost-Nixon.
Blake, as if this was going to be Richard Nixon finally being confronted about, why didn't you destroy the tapes, Mr. Nixon?
This was like a very simple, run-of-the-mill interview with hype that would lead you to believe that she was being confronted on the scandal of the century.
But some of the questions were fine.
The end of the interview was just nauseating.
Kamala Harris, what does it make you feel that your niece with cornrows is able to watch you with this picture?
Oh, Tim Walz, you know, your son, Tell us about how much you love your son.
I mean, my favorite and lesser appreciated part of this interview was Kamala Harris' obviously fraudulent and lying telling of what happened when Joe Biden called her.
Oh yeah, I was cooking pancakes and bacon and I had my nieces around.
I got the phone call and yeah, I think that's what happened because it was a Sunday.
It was so scripted.
It was so rehearsed.
Obviously not the truth.
Okay, Blake, your thoughts here further as we dive into this.
I seized on the same thing.
So I don't know if the details about Bacon or Pancakes or whatever are fake, but what was really telling to me was Dana Bash was pushing at that specific, what did you say on the call?
Did you ask for his endorsement?
Did he promise his endorsement?
And she was very evasive on that point.
She doesn't mention what he said on the call other than that he was dropping out.
Dana pushed that again.
She said, and he says, did you, did you ask for his endorsement?
She says, he made it clear he was endorsing, he was backing me.
And she pushes at it again.
What exactly did he say?
And Kamala pivots and says, Oh, really?
I was just, I was thinking, I was so worried about, about Joe Biden.
That that's where my, my first thought was something was left out there.
Maybe we'll never know what it was, but.
I like to believe people would detect something was being hidden there.
It's the sort of thing you'd see in a movie.
They'd be like, slow it down.
Play it again.
She didn't mention something.
What was going on there?
The other thing I thought was funny in the later part of the interview is they throw two softballs at her.
They throw what you mentioned with her niece or whoever it was in the photo.
Which is fine.
Yeah, fine, whatever.
You get a couple softballs.
It's fine.
It's fine.
Yes, it's fine.
But they also threw that softball that was, you know, hey, Trump said those comments about your race where you were Indian and then black.
Total softball to just get some hits on Trump.
And she doesn't take it.
She just says, oh, that's Trump being Trump again?
Next question.
I think what we were seeing there is her campaign, her advisors say, look, we're pivoting hard to the middle.
We've seen her pivot on an electric vehicle mandate.
She's pivoted on fracking.
She's pivoting on the border.
Now she says she wants a wall.
And I think one of the things they said is, look, they don't want any Identity politics stuff front and center.
Basically, don't talk about being a woman, don't talk about your racial stuff, it's gonna put off moderates somehow.
I think like she only maybe even over learned that and they're just like, nope, don't talk about it.
And I guess we'll see whether it's a good strategy or not.
But it was it was very glaring how much she was staying away from that compared to what we would have seen in 2020, what her own campaign did in 2020, 2016, or a lot of other Democrat elections in recent history.
Jack, we have Tyler.
Tyler, did you catch any part of the interview here?
Pieces.
Bits and pieces as I was going along.
I was watching the text come through.
I think this version of Kamala is boring.
They're trying to make her boring.
I'm not sure we want excited Kamala.
I'm not sure America's ready for it.
They're trying to make her palatable for boomers.
This is pure boomer programming.
Can a boomer be okay with her as president?
That's what this is.
I mean, and it's true, I mean, you look at the numbers from the polling, you know, she's doing awful with men across the board, but best with older men.
Which is mind-numbing to me.
Like, it's just mind-numbing to me.
Because it was... Of all the male demos, it's boomer men.
But it's pretty consistent if you actually break down the polls and they're trying to hide all the other inadequacies and they're really hoping that younger men don't turn out as well, which is not the trend.
I mean, I don't know if it's going to be the trend or not, but I mean, this is why we have to turn out as many young men as possible.
The reality is this is like it's so mind-numbing to me because if you live through the Tea Party era old men like were the most you know vicious against Obama and that entire regime and everything else and it's just like it's it's like almost like we're living in an alternate universe where it's like they're totally falling for everything and and I just can't understand this Charlie I really don't when I watch this and I read this and I'm we're witnessing this like slow train wreck with this It's like, how is it possible that older people within the Republican Party in particular, but older independents could potentially be totally duped by this?
Like, I just don't get it because I'm watching it and it's not... There's... One sec, Jack.
I call them white noise boomers.
And basically, they have the television on all day long, and it's white noise.
And Democrats dominate on white noise.
It's for their dogs.
They run more ads, they control more local TV.
Yeah, no, it's just, it's called white noise boomers, right?
And nothing against them, but it's just the companion they have in the House is cable television.
And they watch CNN, they watch MSNBC, they watch local TV.
Jack, your thoughts?
Yeah, so my thought on that is that also the When it comes to polling, right, so when it comes to the type of polls that you get, who are the people
Well, the people who are more likely are what Charlie's just talking about, these white noisers, that a white noiser is 10 times more likely to want to pick up that phone to tell the pollster how much they hate Donald Trump.
They say, this guy's the worst.
Oh, he's terrible.
These are the people who have the signs, the yard signs, you know, hate has no home in this house, et cetera, et cetera, refugees welcome, all those other things.
Whereas when you've got a Trump supporter, they don't want to answer the phones
when they hear that somebody from the media.
Now, I was talking about this on my show earlier, but when it's me, I love,
because I have a Pennsylvania number, so I'm always getting called and pulled all the time,
and I constantly just make up all sorts of random things to tell them.
I just answer things all over the place because I love screwing with pollster data.
And, you know, look, the average Trump supporter is nowhere going to be at the same rate of response that your white noiser that Charlie is talking about is specifically in that age demographic.
And that I'm not going to say there's a ton of that, but I am saying that it's something to look out for.
I'm looking now, I'm looking at more of the reaction on Twitter, and something that's been pointed out interestingly is Kamala seems really afraid, she's got that problem of, can she split from Joe Biden on anything?
Joe Biden's a really unpopular president, it's a really unpopular administration, yet she's really struggled to answer, what would you do differently?
And what's being, I'm seeing posted here from Zaid Jilani, who's kind of a dissident left-winger guy on Twitter, and he pointed out In 2000, Al Gore actually had a pretty good answer to this question where they said, will this just be a third Clinton-Gore term?
He probably should have said, yes, Clinton was a lot more popular than Biden was.
But he said, no, we're different people.
We have different challenges.
I would do things differently.
And he was able to say that, like, clear cut.
And Kamala is very afraid to do that.
And I kind of wonder if one of the reasons is she just doesn't actually have a good answer to that question.
What would she do differently?
It's just like when she answers, what would you do on day one?
Kamala's not actually a policy person.
She doesn't have strong ideas on what to do.
So she can't organically, off the cuff, talk about things she would do as president.
She is an empty suit.
She's...
A nervous wreck, and they're literally just... They've stuck her in there because she's the only option they had, and they're hanging on for dear life.
They're just trying to get through the election.
It's like that old Robert Redford movie, The Candidate, where the guy runs for Senate, he wins, and the final scene is him turning to, I think, his campaign manager and saying, What do we do now?
And I think that's what we'd be with with Kamala.
If they somehow God forbid win this election.
They turn to each other and say, what do we do now?
We're holding the hot potato for four years and we have president empty, empty pantsuit.
And that's what... So Blake, I want, I want to go into this.
You sent a message today.
Something about how Trump should zero in on her nerves, saying that Kamala is nervous, she should be.
She's a nervous wreck, trying to almost play into her anxiety.
She's obviously on anxiety medication, whether it be benzodiazepines or she's on Xanax or Val- there's something that she's taking because she can't handle the pressure.
Framing her as a nervous wreck.
That's why she does the nervous laugh.
That's probably why she drinks so much, to calm her nerves.
Walk us through that, Blake.
The need to frame her, or the benefit of framing her as a nervous wreck.
Yeah, sure, Charlie.
So it's one of those things, once you're looking for it, you start to see it all the time.
Her kind of wacky hand movements, her nervous laugh.
She has a strange laugh that they actually have had to coach her to use less.
Uh, sort of her nervous smile.
She has this way of carrying herself that's indicative of a person who's like a little lower in confidence, is nervous.
You never see Trump do any of these things because Trump, whatever his other traits, is a supremely self-confident individual.
He never does these things.
And so you can see she's kind of got that Imposter syndrome is a term we've used before.
She's, again, she's a nervous person.
This also shows through in the stories about her staff.
She's a bad boss.
She sort of bullies people under her, treats them badly.
This again is a sign of a person.
They're nervous.
They're not secure in their position.
When things go wrong, they're kind of like looking at other people to blame for their problems.
They scream at them.
Good leaders tend to, good self-confident leaders have good staffs beneath them.
It just, it flows out of how they are as a person.
So anyway, once you've known this, it explains so many of the things Kamala has to do.
She can't do interviews because she'll freeze up in the interviews.
This is why she's so awkward in unscripted situations.
If she's put on the spot, she's worried about screwing up, and she kind of starts screwing up.
I think we could see that with, you know, the day one answer.
She doesn't have a good answer to this question.
She's trying to just word salad her way out of it.
So anyway, I just think As we were discussing, pointing this out is probably a good
way to actually make it worse.
It's like once you send the message, we're aware of what your weakness is, Kamala.
Your problem is you're nervous.
Your problem is when you start talking, you screw it up.
And it's good in two ways.
One, the only way you can really rebut this is by giving more interviews and showing yourself more to prove that it's wrong.
And I think we have had more than enough evidence at this point that if she's doing that, it'll go not great for her.
At best, it'll be break-even.
Very likely she'll look bad.
And there's a big chance she'll say something super embarrassing and damage her campaign.
Or she just avoids doing that and she continues to avoid doing interviews, avoid doing unscripted things, won't do a...
Press conference.
And now we have a ready-made reason.
Oh, it's nervous Kamala again.
Hiding away.
Can't stand up for herself.
Can't explain what she really thinks.
And I think this could be the skeleton key to attack Kamala in a slightly more personal way without going after, like, her personal life in a way that I think we agree is probably not the best way to damage Kamala.
It'll just kind of be thrown back at us.
So you want a way to needle her without making it overtly personal in a way that puts off voters.
Jack, let's play some tape here.
Let's kind of refresh the audience of what happened tonight.
Let's play Cut 147 to kind of jog our memory.
Play Cut 147.
If you are elected, what would you do on day one in the White House?
Well, there are a number of things.
I will tell you first and foremost, one of my highest priorities is to do what we can to support and strengthen the middle class.
When I look at the aspirations, the goals, the ambitions of the American people, I think that people are ready for a new way forward.
In a way that generations of Americans have been fueled by hope and by optimism.
I think sadly in the last decade we have had in the former president someone who has
really been pushing an agenda and an environment that is about diminishing the character and the
strength of who we are as Americans, really dividing our nation and I think people are
ready to turn the page on that. What did she just say?
Obviously, I'm a Trump guy.
Can somebody tell me what the heck she just said?
The question is, what are you going to do on day one?
And she's talking about turning the page.
You're the vice president of the United States.
Don't tell me about turning the page and she's scratching her chin.
Does she have staff?
Have you prepared, Kamala?
Have you done any work?
I mean, how do we go from what are you going to do on day one to people are going to turn the page?
You have one job.
Tell us what you're going to do on day one.
Rebuild the middle class?
That doesn't mean anything, okay?
You're currently the vice president.
And by the way, I don't know, she's not getting enough sleep.
She looks rough.
Jack, what's going on here?
Well, what's going on here, Charlie, is that she needs a MyPillow.
I know Michael Lindell was there at the DNC last week.
You know, he was in disguise.
He disguised himself like he had the Roger Stone hat and shaved his mustache.
You know, he was offering my pillows to, uh, to Democrats there and I think she really should have taken him up on that.
No, this is the kind of question.
And by the way, Charlie, the kind of question, what would you do on day one?
This isn't just a layup, right?
First of all, this is the obvious question that's always going to get asked in one of these issues.
but this question is actually beneficial to the candidate because when you are, this is like,
this is like political consulting 101, folks.
When you are working with a candidate, what you're doing, your candidate's going into an interview
and I've worked on a lot of campaigns.
The first thing you do is you say, whatever questions they have,
whatever the scandals they bring up, whatever stuff they have in the news,
bring it back to your message, bring it back to what you're gonna do,
bring it back to what your policies are.
So you have to have something to say when they ask you what your policies are.
Donald Trump, day one, he'll have 15 things off the top of his head and he'll probably come up with like three more just in the middle of the questions.
I'm going to do this, I'm going to do this, I'm going to do this, I'm going to do so many things on day one.
Your head's going to spin.
She's sitting there going, oh, and as you say, she's looking around, her body language.
So what you're talking about.
She's even worse than that.
She somehow, she somehow turned a question on day one into Donald Trump.
She somehow turned it, Jack.
It's unbelievable.
Yeah.
So, Charlie, by the way, what you're referring to is a cluster gesture.
So, when I was at Guantanamo and I was in the interrogation cell, one of the things that we learned about down there and that we would look at for detainees was a cluster gesture.
So, you mentioned that she put her hand to her face.
Look, people do that on occasion.
You might have a scratch, okay?
You might have a scratch, you do that.
But when you start seeing multiple elements of gestures that are put into place all at once that occur
very rapidly. We're talking micro expression, the hand to the face, the looking down, the
looking away, the hunting of the shoulder, she actually shrinks, like she's shrinking, she's
terrified. So so anxiety, the fear, the things that Blake was talking about, it's all
there, it's all exhibited in this cluster gesture. And so and of course, by the way,
unfortunately, or you know, whatever it is, the the medium of television means that the camera is going
to be zoomed in on your face.
And so you let Charlie you and I know about this every single day. That's our line of business.
And you know, you know that whatever expression you make, it's going to be picked apart by a
million people that are watching it. So you're constantly thinking about it. Now you and I
aren't running for office. I don't believe either of us have ever run for office. And so you'd think
that anyone running in the modern era would would know about these things. I mean, how many
interviews has she done in her life. And this feels like it felt like she was in her very first
interview and Dana Bash was trying very hard, excuse me, Donna Bush was trying very hard to
to hold her hand on this and she still was anxious.
By the way Blake one of the stories have and I think we told it on here on ThoughtCrime maybe a week or two ago but about the time where she was going to go to some it's like an ambassador's dinner or something some kind of social function and she was so anxious about going to this function that she had her entire staff go and create like a like a Dummy function that she could go to where they were role-playing different people at the, it was just like a cocktail reception at somebody's house.
And, and she like had little, and her staff created little scripts and she had to like navigate the room.
And this is how you act like a regular human person, Kamala, a human person.
And, and it's, I mean, this is someone with, with those kinds of nerves.
And this is obviously something that president Trump can dig into.
It's how do you have someone who's that nervous, Who's that insecure?
Who that lacks that much confidence being the leader of the most powerful nation in the world?
It's ridiculous.
It's insane.
And you're honestly treating the American people as infantile for even suggesting it.
Blake, tell us that story of how she had to kind of pre-rehearse a meeting.
Give me a second.
I'll look it up.
You can check on the score.
Is NDSU still beating Colorado?
We've got to stand up for the team.
There is no defense being played here, by the way.
They might as well just play 7-on-7 at this point.
And I am actively cheering against Deion Sanders, for the record.
Here's something I want to say as well because this is similar to what we saw last week on with the with the nomination because there's gonna be people who say and I saw this Charlie I saw this in our comments they said oh you and Charlie are coping you know you guys are you know it wasn't that bad I said guys this was mid Okay, you have to understand you're running for the presidency of the United States.
Mid is not good enough.
If that's your best, then your best ain't good enough.
It's like you're just talking about in sports.
If you want to go to the professional level, if you want to play elite level sports, then you need to be at the elite level.
This was not that.
You say, oh, well, she kind of, she got through it.
she didn't have a train wreck.
No, but didn't have a train wreck.
She like barely made it on base if she made it on base anywhere in that interview.
I know I'm not making any lewd references.
But what I'm saying is, is that that was not the level of anything you needed
for running for the president of the United States.
The same as her nomination, it was boring.
There were, by the way, no breakout lines, no breakout moments.
You didn't sound like they had anything, you know how like politicians
will have those sort of preplanned like, and on day one we're gonna do this.
And we have the politics of disaster.
We need the politics of success.
Whatever.
There was none of that.
There was just none of that throughout the entire time she was in response mode.
It didn't seem planned, it felt rushed, it was not presidential.
All right.
I got it, Charlie.
I got it.
So this is from Axios.
No, I'm not saying it was like a personal disaster, which by the way, the rally had a lot of personal disasters.
If you want to talk about those earlier in the evening, and I'm sure we'll get to those clips,
but yeah, mid is not good enough.
No way.
All right, I got it, Charlie.
I got it.
So this is from Axios.
They reported it just after she joined the race.
In April, 2022, Harris was the guest for a dinner at DC News mogul, David Bradley's home.
A salon style event, Bradley hosts with Washington journalists and newsmakers.
So at this point, Kamala is already the Vice President of the United States, and this is not a high-stakes summit.
This is not nuclear tensions with Iran or Russia or whatever.
This is meeting journalists at a guy's house in DC.
And it says here from Axios, quote, Harris' anxiety about the dinner was such that her staff held a mock dinner beforehand with staffers playing participants, according to two people familiar with the event.
Harris' aides even considered including wine in the mock prep so Harris could practice with a glass or two.
They ultimately decided against it.
She was already three drinks deep when she got to the practice.
If she wins, it will be like our first sitcom character elected as president.
It'll be really not good.
There was so much talk last time about having Joe Biden do a drug test.
Can we have Kamala Harris do a drug test?
We should know what anti-anxiety medication Kamala Harris has done.
And what kind of Chardonnay and what kind of wine is she mixing it with?
It's a national security risk.
Nervous Kamala.
Antsy Kamala.
Maybe that's the nickname Trump's going to have to use.
My biggest takeaway from that is you can't practice with two glasses if you've already had three.
So that's... I feel like that's the understated thing.
They left out that part.
They're like, look, she gets sloshed enough if we have two practice glasses.
And then this is right before the dinner.
So she just goes from there to the dinner.
Oh, boy.
I think that the big thing and I don't know if we want to discuss this at length but I mean just visually watching this her being in like the back of the table just slouched back and is leaning back like this.
I thought it was terrible.
It was like this is what she looked like the whole time.
And then you had, you know, Timmy over there, just like this, like on the side of the, I mean, if you look at the, that, that frame, it's like the weirdest scenario.
Like, I don't just, I can't believe they picked that to like frame that.
The Democrats are just so terrible at framing between Biden looking like Adolf Hitler in that one, you know... You would think that they're good at it.
Let's play cut 148.
The visuals of this were awful.
It was as if they were in a cafeteria or some sort of dimly lit back room.
It was very bizarre.
Play cut 148.
You have been vice president for three and a half years.
The steps that you're talking about now, Why haven't you done them already?
Well, first of all, we had to recover as an economy, and we have done that.
I'm very proud of the work that we have done that has brought inflation down to less than 3%.
The work that we have done to cap the cost of insulin at $35 a month for seniors.
Donald Trump said he was going to do a number of things, including allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices.
Never happened.
We did it.
Tim Waltz looks like, he looks massive.
He looks like, what's his name from McDonald's?
The big purple guy?
Grimace.
He's like Grimace size in the corner and you've got her like Hamburglar back there just like literally at the back of the frame in the dark just kind of just like sliding with her big shoulder pads too.
Who thought that visual was a good idea?
She looks like she's drowning in her jacket, too.
And she's like, you mentioned it, Charlie.
She hasn't drank in probably two days in prep for this.
So you can see her face is just like, she's starting to shake a little bit because she needs vodka.
And, you know, it's just like, this whole thing, this is, and Grimace up here, look at Grimace!
I mean, he's huge, and he's like doing nothing the whole time.
And she just keeps getting interacted with.
And I missed the waltz parts, but like, She just slouches way back and looks almost like a weird hamburger mobster in the back.
That's all I could think about the whole time.
I don't know.
I'm going to sit like this for the rest of the time.
You've got a deep knowledge of McDonald's lore.
Well, Grimace became famous again last year because they did that whole shake thing.
So it's just like on the psyche.
And Jack posted about how... I had a tweet earlier this week that went pretty viral, actually, because I was just doing a riff on things that Trump is going to bring back from the 80s and 90s.
And I found one that not a lot of people talk about, which we've got to try, if the guy's going to try to get the photo up, the original McDonald's playground.
And I'm like, Charlie's like, what are you talking about?
And he's like, when I was a child, I didn't play.
I did arithmetic and studied dead languages.
Charlie's from the backyard of where McDonald's was like started.
It's true.
And that's where he went though.
But but so the old the old playground had like the it was the Hamburglar prison that you would climb into and it had like the metal slide and just so much really cool stuff and I think I unlocked a lot of a lot of core memories but it also goes back to what I was talking about with the Pizza Hut nationalism thing this idea that you know we used to have a world that was we have a country that was just very welcoming towards children that That was very open towards children.
And, you know, this is kind of one of the things that gets into, you know, all these questions about like, like fertility and abortion and IVF.
And these are all like these big, you know, third rail topics that are coming up today and over the past couple of days.
But I think a huge part of it is that we just used to have a country that was much more Let's play another piece of tape here.
Let's see what CNN is saying afterwards.
Let's go to 155 here.
being around at a regular time.
It was much more family-oriented country.
And now all of that's been pushed aside, and it's leading to all these other issues.
Let's play another piece of tape here.
Let's see what CNN is saying afterwards.
Let's go to 155 here.
Now, you might not like the way she answered him, but she answered him as a capable, qualified leader.
And I do think she...
I think she moved the ball forward a little bit.
You know, maybe she didn't score a touchdown.
Yeah, that's really insightful.
Let's play Cut 154 now.
Let's not be mistaken.
I mean, Donald Trump is tall and very loud.
Yes.
And he is very persistent.
It's not going to be so easy to just say, OK, let's move on.
He's going to be right there.
Yes, but I think you have to play.
So they're trying to figure out exactly how to prepare Kamala Harris for the debate.
Tyler, based on what we saw here, I don't think this debate's going to go very well for her.
She's not going to have an emotional support animal.
She's not going to have notes.
I mean, it was kind of, in some ways, in right-wing circles, we said, oh, she's not good at talking.
She's actually really bad at this.
She's a nervous wreck.
She's not equipped to be vice president, let alone president of the United States.
Tyler, tell us more.
Yeah, I mean, this is all I could think about the entire time they were looking at this was, what did we not see?
Because this is edited, and I know we've covered that a couple times here, but this is edited.
What was not here is the most interesting indicator of what this debate's gonna look like,
especially this first one.
And I mean, I'm excited.
I mean, I've always been excited for this because we know, the same way that we knew
that Joe Biden could not form sentences, we know that Kamala's not gonna be able
to maintain her composure.
She's not gonna be able to handle herself.
Like I said, I really do believe it.
I'm not joking when I say this, is that they probably Adderalled her up,
said you can't drink for a few days, or I don't know, remember Obama smoked
and all that stuff and it chilled his nerves.
And they just handle, you handle yourself differently when you head into these situations.
This is not a good lead-up, run-up practice, if you will, for what the debate's going to look like if you're her team.
And I can only imagine the inside, you know, NBA'd up stuff that's going on over in Kamala camp.
And I hope someday it ends up in a book that we all get to read.
But, you know, after a loss, a Kamala loss.
This is going to be a very, very interesting scenario that pops out here.
And if anybody had any kind of journalistic integrity over over in that camp, Donna and anyone else, you know, there would be some demands here that all this would get played and that the transcript would be released and that we would see the place, the uncut version of this, at least online.
But we know they'll never do that.
Speaking of the debates, I think we've actually had some interesting stuff this week that I think is, it's alluding to how the debate might go.
We had this sudden push from the Kamala camp to change the debate rules.
So for everyone who's forgotten, the rules back in June at basically the request of the Biden campaign were mics are muted when you're not talking, And you can't bring notes into it, you can make notes during it, and there will be no studio audience.
Trump basically agreed to it because he said, I'll debate wherever, whatever you want.
And then the Kamala camp is saying, can we change this?
Can we actually turn the mics back on?
And then the other request they made, which I think didn't get as much attention as it should have, was she asked, can we, one, make opening statements, and two, can we bring prepared notes as well as making notes during the debate itself?
And what that's communicating to me is that they, as we saw here, they're not confident when Kamala has to think off the cuff, has to respond to something that she's unprepared for.
So what they wanted is they wanted the mics on.
Smart.
They wanted the mics on because they thought that they could kind of, you know, maybe Trump would try to interrupt her or she could try to interrupt Trump, but I think they just count on Trump doing it.
And then, you know, you can make it all personal and bitter and they'll go back and forth on this.
And the other thing is they want to make it as prepared and scripted as possible.
If she can bring in notes and they can make an opening statement, she can give some three or four minute opening statement.
Some people will turn off the debate after the opening statements already, and she can have all these, like, little prepared lines.
So, okay, if they ask you about abortion, say this.
If they ask you about the border, say this.
You know, if she comes in with 15, 20 canned lines, she can get out as many of those as she can.
Her only good debate moment in the primaries in 2019 was an obviously scripted, oh, that little girl was me, Joe Biden's a racist.
That was the only good moment she had.
It was obviously scripted, not made up off the cuff.
We are seeing over and over, Kamala is telling us this, her body language is telling us this, her campaign strategic decisions are telling us this, how she engages with the media, it's all screaming at us.
Kamala is not prepared for this, is not ready for this, and they need to cover this up and conceal it by scripting everything as much as possible.
You know, and I was really surprised, and this was, you know, in the lead up to the debate as well.
I was actually shocked they didn't spend more time on really stupid, stupid stuff.
I thought there was actually some decent questions mixed in there that aired.
You know, who knows what didn't air.
But, you know, there is the pieces that were aired were, you know, well, you know, you are the incumbent and, you know, what are you doing?
You know, I was kind of shocked that that actually got asked, because I didn't think any of that was going to get asked.
So that's a white pill moment for a second, because I think that added to the tenseness of everything.
But I was really surprised there wasn't more, you know...
Green New Deal type stuff like adjacent stuff and just talking more about abortion and you know the question got brought up about you know Kamala being black yeah and if they're not being black or whatever because you know there's that debate that's going on in society.
I think most in the black community honestly more than anything else I think that's right.
We discussed it.
She didn't answer.
She didn't take the bait.
She didn't answer, which I don't know if maybe that added to the part of the problem.
They expected to spend, I don't know, 20 minutes on that or something, and they did not.
So I need an entire segment on it.
But, you know, I think that it really tees up.
I think this interview actually tees up the debate properly because, you know, of course they're
going to ask some of these stupid things.
But I think what this tells us is that they know even, you know, the MSNBC, CNN types
know that America doesn't care about that stuff.
So they're trying to make her look is, you know, rational, reasonable, you know, try
to talk about the things.
Obviously she came out with like the build the wall policy this week and everything else.
They're just like she's just trying to copy Trump.
And that's a sign of desperation.
Kelly tweeted today, you know, talk about putting Republicans in her cabinet.
That's a sign of desperation.
They're running with this whole Republicans for Harris thing.
That's desperation.
They see the data, and let's just red pill everybody.
I'm not saying we're going to win, but Blake will even agree that the data is much better than it was two weeks ago.
Nate Silver agrees.
Like, the data is nowhere near where it was in the honeymoon sugar high two weeks ago.
It's changing, it's normalizing, and who wants to interject there?
Well, I was just going to say, Charlie, it's the data isn't just better.
They're having to shift.
I think it's even better than the better that we're seeing because they're having to play catch up with the shifting polls, too, on things like some of the polling that we're seeing is really oversampling Democrats still, you know, and as we get closer to the election, I think we kind of anticipated that based off of previous elections.
I was expecting less of that to happen the closer we get to the election.
only a big yeah and the other guys this but like look at yours with with written yet with with various
i mean i would i would i was expecting less of that to happen the closer it's the election i mean
we're effectively a month out from early ballots
right so the election in north carolina yes it's a week senator cannon
and i think uh... ballots without yesterday in in new york But this is a real ending of the thing, and I would argue even some of the polls I saw today were worse than some of the ones that we saw before.
One that came out today, we were looking at it and identifying it, it had only 1% of the Democrats that polled voting for Trump.
In no real world, in no swing state, is that happening.
And it's certainly not indicative of nationwide polling of everything that we're seeing everywhere else.
That's really bad because even the worst polls and some of these non-ideal polls, they're shifting.
And I think that some of that is because they're just trying to keep up this charade.
And I think that some of the pollsters are in on it, whether they intend to be or not.
Let's play, let's play Cut 106.
This is Mark Halperin, who this two days ago predicted, and today we saw that some of the data, Nate Silver now has Donald Trump with a 52% chance of winning.
Again, all this is subject to change.
It goes up, it goes down.
It's what we call the Polar Coaster, but interesting nonetheless.
It's been a big movement.
Let's play Cut 106.
There's some public polling already.
There's more coming.
And there's some private polling that suggests that nationally in the battleground states, she's not ahead.
She might be ahead on paper, but well within the margin of error.
And there's some battleground states now where I think Donald Trump's, on this trajectory, is going to be ahead.
And it may be, regardless of what happens in the interview and regardless what happens in the debate, it may be that by the middle of September, when things have calmed down, when the Trump campaign have had time to prey on some of the weaknesses that I suggested, that he's ahead in all the Sun Belt states and ahead in Pennsylvania.
and competitive in Michigan and Wisconsin, which would be roughly where Joe Biden was
before the debate with a single path to 270 electoral votes, the three Great Lakes states
in Nebraska too. And that would be a scary position for the Democratic Party to be in
from mid-September through Election Day. Who wants to take that? Yeah, I mean, look,
what he's doing there is explaining that something that you've been hearing a few
people in the media speak of already what they're referring to as the blue mirage.
And the blue mirage, now, of course, is a reference to what we were told all the way back in 2000, the red mirage of when they said, oh, Donald Trump's going to be up big prior to mail-in ballots coming in.
And then when mail-in ballots come in, it's going to tighten.
Now, we weren't told that it was going to Absolutely fly up to another level but of course that's another story but the Blue Mirage now what they're saying is is kind of what we were talking about before about this response bias in polls talking about the fact that there's people who are giving this huge bounce there's a lot of people who have a sugar high after
Not so much the DNC itself, but actually just the dropping out of Joe Biden.
And what he's saying there is, of course, the Blue Mirage might just be all of this gaslighting.
He's being very careful about the way he says it, by the way.
He's saying, look, there's a lot of information out there to say the race is probably a lot closer than it looks.
And there are some indications that a few of these key swing states,
one of which being my home state of Pennsylvania, might actually be closer to the Trump camp. And of course,
one of the main things you have to look at in terms of this is the fundamentals.
The fundamentals have not changed between Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.
What's changed is that they have this sort of, they're offering this potential of it's very, very Barack
Obama.
So there's a potential for change, but it's this really weird situation where she's trying to
claim credit for the things that she believes are good that were under the Biden
Harris administration, but at the same time,
also trying to position herself as a change candidate.
So she's trying to be the incumbent and the challenger at the same time.
And that dog don't hunt.
That is not going to work eventually, and Donald Trump is gonna slaughter her on those questions
and all of these.
He's gonna heighten the contradictions in 12 days time of that debate,
and she knows he's gonna do it, and that's another reason she's terrified.
Notice, in her little, by the way, why is your chair so low?
But in her little chair there, every time they mention Trump, she kind of recoils.
Do you notice that?
They mention Trump, but she sort of, she recoils, she gets the hunched shoulders,
she turtles, you know, again, these cluster gestures that we see over and over.
She has no poker face, and you know, what can I say?
You know, using a lot of inebriating substances It's according to studies.
So let me ask a question, which is, Blake, you are a resident Tim Walz critic.
Do you think that Tim Walz successfully navigated the attacks with a question about stolen valor, drunk driving, lying about fertility treatments, lying about basically everything?
Is that now water under the bridge?
Should Dana Bash follow it up more?
I think she should have pushed harder, because the answer was total BS.
First of all, on the National Guard thing, she only actually pushed on the carried weapons in war thing, and I think that's carried a lot of it, because people have talked about stolen valor.
It's the easiest thing to just say, oh, he may be told a straight-up lie, but by far the worst thing about Tim Walz's military stuff is not that, it's that He was in his unit, they were told they were deploying to Iraq, and according to the statements of everyone who was around at the time who's gone on the record, Walls lied to his fellow soldiers, he cut and ran, he bailed out in a situation where the moral expectation was he should have served with his unit, and instead he lied to the person above him, according to that guy, went behind him, she should have pushed harder on that.
And then also just the way he pivoted about it was very Awkward. He just says I'm you know, I'm so I'm so
passionate about things and I get you know I get worked up when people attack my kids
Well, people were not attacking your kids. They're attacking you. He did a similar dodge with a DUI thing
He says I owned my mistakes. She should have followed up immediately and said you don't own your mistakes
You had a DUI, and more than a decade later, you were lying about it and saying, you didn't have a DUI.
You actually just had a miscommunication with an officer because you're deaf.
Well, well, Tim Walz, that's not what you said in the court hearing, which we have the transcript of.
It's not what your breathalyzer test said.
There's all this evidence that you lied about this thing.
You would not take responsibility for it.
The other thing I wish he would have pushed at is, I wish someone would push at his actual tenure as governor of Minnesota.
We're supposed to take it as a given that he's at least been a good governor, but no, he's a crappy governor.
He was the governor during the George Floyd riots.
He didn't call out the National Guard when the mayor of Minnesota, or of Minneapolis, asked him to do it.
He let a police precinct get burned to the ground by Antifa.
He is the only governor in America who can really definitively say he let an entire city in his state be taken over by an armed violent mob.
He should be pushed at that.
I think Walz remains extremely vulnerable on his personal history, on his political history, and on all of the statements that he's made to the public.
And I don't know if that will be a big force in the overall election, but I certainly know the military stuff, the National Guard stuff, that has gotten a lot of play with the people that that is most interesting to, which is veterans groups, current soldiers.
They do hear about these things through their own networks.
I have to believe that for a few of them, this will play a role in how they vote.
Well, and I want to point out something, just to remind everyone.
Remember back in 2000, when five days before the election, the Democrats dropped that bomb on the George W. Bush DUI?
Do you remember this?
Bush had a DUI and it was a big deal.
It took over the entire news cycle.
Yeah, that's what Bush had different.
Bush had a DUI and it was like a big deal.
It like took over the entire news cycle.
This was like days before the election in 2000.
And this was the October surprise.
This was the big surprise.
It was like days before the election because that's back when we used to vote on one day.
And so it was like literally just a few days before.
That doesn't make any sense.
That's like impossible.
Yeah, you can't do it.
You can't do it.
Uh, but, uh, that the crazy part was, is what, what, what did Bush do?
So it actually happened in Wisconsin.
He was, he was campaigning in Wisconsin and they come up to him and they drop it.
And the reporter asks him and goes, Hey, you know, what do you have to say about this DUI?
And he's like, yeah, I made some dumb mistakes.
And he, like, owned up to it immediately.
Without, like, being prepared, knowing it was coming, anything at all.
And again, like, you know, that's such a different position from, like, this is, like, versus Tim Waltz, who literally lies about everything.
He lies about everything.
Every major mess-up that he's made in his life, he runs from, hides, paints it as a different picture.
You know, he's not an honest, regular dude in any kind of capacity.
I just thought it was interesting just comparing the two.
Let's play the Tim Walz convo here.
It's cut 151.
You had to clarify that you had said that you and your wife used IVF, but it turned out you used a different kind of fertility in order to have children.
And then when you ran for Congress in 2006, your campaign repeatedly made false statements about a 1995 arrest for drunk and reckless driving.
What do you say to voters who aren't sure whether they can take you at your word?
Well, I've been very public.
I think they can see my students come out, former folks I've served with, and they do, they vouch for me.
I certainly own my mistakes when I make them.
The one thing I'll tell you is, I wished in this country we wouldn't have to do this.
What do your students have to do with IVF?
What, are you having kids with your students?
What kind of stupid, demented freak is this guy?
You're talking about IVF?
Oh, you can talk to my students?
Why the heck am I going to talk to your students about IVF?
Your students prove your fertility?
Your students are going to know whether or not you're fertile?
Your students are going to know about whether or not your sperm works?
What kind of demented person is this?
Hey, you lied about that IVF.
You know, you should go ask the kids I coached.
You should go ask the kids.
They're asking him about whether his sperm works and he started talking about his students.
Play it.
Play back the tape.
Play caught 151.
You had to clarify that you had said that you and your wife You used IVF, but it turned out you used a different kind of fertility in order to have children.
And then when you ran for Congress in 2006, your campaign repeatedly made false statements about a 1995 arrest for drunk and reckless driving.
What do you say to voters who aren't sure whether they can take you at your word?
Well, I've been very public.
I think they can see my students come out, former folks I've served with, and they do, they vouch for me.
I certainly own my mistakes when I make them.
The one thing I'll tell you is, I wished in this country we wouldn't have to do this.
I mean, again, I don't know what your students have to do with your drunk driving or your difficulty getting pregnant.
I'm sorry, I just, you guys can take it from here.
I mean, it is the weirdest response.
And again, this just goes back.
The crazy, the crazy part is this guy just lies about everything.
IVF, his, you know, this.
No, but I mean, you want to talk about a non sequitur.
Oh, you know, you could just ask all my football players.
They'll tell you I'm plenty fertile.
Like what are you talking about?
Everything's working great down there.
All 22 guys on the starting roster.
Exactly!
Run them out there.
You could just talk to my students.
I'm very public.
That's not what we're talking about!
And like, what's even crazier is that when you look into those questions, and they also get into the question about his military service and lying about carrying weapons of war, he never once actually just admits what he did.
He never does what Tyler was just talking about that Bush did in 2000 and said, yeah, I made some mistakes.
Never says it.
He said he blames his wife.
He blames grammar.
He brings up the dead children in school shootings. I was very, I was very
impassioned about the dead children.
So you, you know, totally exploiting these horrible situations, these horrible incidents.
And he never once owns up. And you can, by the way, see him getting a little frustrated. It's
a little hot under the collar. And I think that the way that so in the way that we were talking
about how Kamala, she gets anxious. Tim Walz has a tendency and local reporters back in Minnesota
have talked about this, that he has a tendency to get angry.
He has a tendency to get hot under the collar.
He has a tendency to punch back.
He blows his top.
He's quick to anger.
He's almost like an Alec Baldwin in there.
I hope he doesn't have any loaded weapons around him.
But, you know, this is the kind of guy where if J.D.
Vance, when he brings this up, if he really starts poking buttons, you're going to see him absolutely lose it up on that stage.
I think this is going to be clip 157, but this non-sequitur answer, so we have Tim Walz, like, confronted about his lies, and he's just referencing his students.
Another good example was in Kamala, they were confronting her about, I think it was the, like, why aren't you, why haven't you done all the things that you say you're going to do now, because obviously the administration, and she just pivots to this bizarre thing.
Let's just play, 157.
You have been vice president for three and a half years.
The steps that you're talking about now, why haven't you done them already?
I was in Nevada recently, a grandmother who showed me her receipts.
And before, we capped the cost of insulin for seniors at $35 a month.
She was paying hundreds of dollars, up to thousands of dollars a month for her insulin.
She's not doing that anymore.
So you maintain binomics?
Is a success.
I maintain that when we do the work of bringing down prescription medication for the American people Look how big Tim Walz looks!
of the annual cost of prescription medication for seniors at $2,000 when we do what we did in the first year of being in office So that was, again, the question was, why haven't you done the stuff you're pledging to do?
And she's just like, the Biden administration is great.
I was talking to this grandma.
She's paying, she has the receipts for her medicine.
Trump, Trump's bad.
Doesn't answer the question, doesn't even really engage with the question.
Just go to something completely different.
I feel like maybe there's some people that this works on, but I feel like if they're doing it to every awkward question, and there's a lot of awkward questions, and especially if we harp on it, people are going to notice this pattern.
Kamala, she dodges questions.
She dodges even giving interviews.
She dodges press conferences.
She avoids the press.
And when they actually pin her down, she avoids answering the actual questions that they give her.
Maybe avoidant Kamala is one we can go with here.
But she's truly a person who is very afraid to give A direct answer to a question and I think it's it's so telling how different it is for Trump.
Trump will be very combative in his answers.
They'll confront him on something tough like abortion and he'll just like not give an inch.
He'll just start he'll say like oh yeah it was it was great what the Supreme Court did it's great we're gonna do all these things.
He's always on message.
Overly combative.
So yeah maybe overly combative very true but there's never this I don't feel like we ever see Trump just totally refuse to engage with the premise of a question and start telling an unrelated story about something else.
It's just, it's not his style and I'd like to think that the public recognizes that as a strength of his style.
There was a Puck news article recently that they kind of, they released a survey, they asked a bunch of voters, I think it was an Echelon poll, but they were asking people their thoughts on Kamala.
And the number one thing that came to people's minds when they asked independent voters about Kamala, I think 21% picked it, was unprepared.
And I think that's what we're seeing here.
What do you do when you're asked a question you're not prepared for?
You just answer the question that you wish you were asked.
And in this case, it's basically tell some story about a grandmother that you met.
No, she reminds me exactly of, you know, me in school when you're like sleeping and the teacher calls on you and you're like, oh yeah, uh, yeah.
And sometimes I do that on this show, you know, and I'll be like, you know, we've been there, right?
And you just filibuster until someone bails you out.
You just start talking until, you know, Charlie picks it back up and shifts it to somebody else.
That's literally bash and comma.
Oh my gosh, Colorado's up 11 over North Dakota State.
I'm not going to recover from this.
This is terrible.
You're from South Dakota.
I was born in North Dakota.
The states are much like each other.
We have the Dakota Brethren.
People are always saying we should merge the Dakotas.
No, we have to stick together.
Aren't the Dakota Brethren the Lakota, the actual tribe that used to live there?
Isn't that the Dakota Brethren?
No.
I want to see how, guys, we should take a look at how the left is reacting to this.
I'd like to see what MSNBC is saying.
I'd like to see what CNN is saying.
I notice we haven't done that.
And one of the other things, by the way, is that could just be a scheduling thing,
but Donald Trump had a fantastic town hall tonight that just got totally, I think,
honestly, I think it got overshadowed by this, which is sad because he was there with Tulsi Gabbard,
and I saw some clips of it.
It was a great format, just having him sort of freewheeling with the questions,
having Tulsi up there was great.
And look, a lot of the attention was built into this race.
So I hope that at some point, maybe not tonight, if we can get to it, I know it's already getting late,
but over the next couple of days, we can get back to some of that content
that Trump put out tonight, as well as one thing I think we should look at,
maybe the producers can dig into it a little bit, about just the response from the left.
I think we've got some some CNN maybe coming up as to as to what exactly the you
know, because they are the ones okay, they're the ones who needed to do this. Donald
Trump does what 10 interviews a week and he's on like a podcast every time you turn
around I even pointed out that, you know, he was doing another event tonight even during hers.
So you know, this guy's got more content out there like crazy. It was a fantastic event. And,
and she's only ever done one.
And so it's become this sort of like, you know, sort of like, you know, man bites dog kind of situation
where it's like, well, she never gives an interview.
And so even though she had a mid one, it's actually much more newsworthy in a sense
because Trump is just inundating and saturating the environment,
which by the way is a very strong strategy for him.
So I think we have a partner I need to talk about here.
Let's see here.
Okay, look, I know most of us are juggling high stakes responsibilities every day,
whether it's work, family, or just life in general, We all need to be our best day in and day out.
That is, and the truth is, how can you sleep well and sleep make you or break your day?
Poor Sleep Well felt the difference.
This is a company that is called Sleep Naked.
It's different, no melatonin, no nonsense.
It's packed with powerhouse ingredients like magnesium l-theanine, Valerian Root, scientifically proven to help you fall asleep faster and stay asleep longer and wake up feeling refreshed and ready to take on the day.
No grogginess, just real results.
Try it for a month and see how you feel and perform.
Go to BeNaked.com and use promo code, I don't know what the promo code is, Charlie, to save 15% on sleep naked.
You can also pair sleep naked with their daily performance product, Naked Organs.
Head on over to BeNaked.com.
Okay, that's a new one.
Who wants to...
Let's break up 158.
She is making it clear that she will embrace and be a continuation of Biden's economic policy, his record, what they've done.
She offered no remorse, no regrets, no introspection about anything they've done.
She continued to blame inflation on this fantasy price gouging idea.
She had no additional thoughts on the economic situation in the country or what they've done beyond just saying, Joe Biden and I have done a great job.
If I were the Trump people, I would be salivating over the idea that that's how they are going to run the race.
I don't believe it's tenable.
I also thought it was interesting that she didn't take any responsibility at the end for telling the American people that Joe Biden was fine and he was strong.
I mean, we all know that's not true.
That's why he's out of the race, and she's still standing by the idea that he was fine and he's strong and that he's fine today.
Nobody believes that, and I just think at some point... I do.
Then why isn't he running?
Who wants to take that, Blake?
Uh, well first, I want to note that, uh, since we do read the people, anyone who makes a paid Rumble rant, someone ranted that... So, three douchebags against Poso, that's this show.
I would correct you, sometimes it's four douchebags.
Andrew's on two.
So... This is true.
Sometimes Andrew's on.
Sometimes I come on and I'm like, wait, I'm also anti-Poso.
Who's anti-Poso?
No one's anti-Poso.
This guy's very pro-Poso.
He says we're douchebags, though.
Which is fair.
Many people have called me that.
Against Poso, though.
Three douchebags against Poso.
It's us versus Poso.
No, I always support Jack.
Tyler is generally pretty propo.
I'll give Tyler credit on that one.
Except with the Diamondbacks owning the Phillies.
I feel like the Diamondbacks winning the World Series would be good vibes for the state.
Would that make us more likely or less likely to win the state?
More likely.
It would be more likely because Tyler and I would go to those games and ballot chase with MAGA hats on.
Because it would be right during election time.
That's why.
We'd bring a bunch of chasers.
We talked about that, remember?
Didn't we talk about doing a bunch of things on camera last time?
Like buying those tickets right behind home plate.
Like putting Charlie Kirk right behind home plate.
The games are October 25th, 26th, 28th, 29th, 30th, and November 1st.
Right as the final chasing of ballots.
It's October 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, and November 1st, right as the final chasing of ballots.
So there you go.
All right, here's Chris Hayes reacting to anything Trump does.
Play cut 159.
Democracy.
January 6th.
Trump.
I Was not prepared for that
I thought that was good.
Charlie, Charlie's like king of the no cell.
So like, by the way, all of our clips that go viral from this, it's usually me doing something silly and then Charlie being like, So, um, liver wart.
Yes, so if you guys need a liver cleanse.
I totally thought this was just like a regular liver cleanse.
Let's play it again one time in the... Play cut 159.
Democracy.
January 6.
Trump.
Democracy.
January 6.
Trump.
So funny.
Wait, his tie isn't changing.
This is all one show.
This is just one show.
No, you gotta keep it going.
You just gotta keep it going.
This is just one episode.
This is one episode.
We need to get him, like, a walking desk or something.
This guy needs to get in shape.
they should do a celebrity biggest loser.
Cause didn't Lizzo, isn't Lizzo losing weight now because she got fat shamed?
And so she's taking a gap year because she, she's like actually going to some like weight loss clinic
down in like Ecuador or something.
And she's losing all this weight and posting photos of her fat journey,
excuse me, her body positivity journey.
And you know, it's like Chris Hayes, you're next man.
Go get the cabana next to Lizzo.
Just, you know, give her whatever she wants.
You know, she might be a little hungry these days.
I don't know.
I don't know if Chris is on the menu, but you know, Lizzo will not be denied.
But that said, Chris, you got to do something.
You got to take care of yourself, buddy.
You got to take care of yourself.
How old is he?
How old is he?
How old is Chris Hayes?
Chris Hayes is, he's 45.
He is definitely the mascot of the franchise.
He's 45.
Yeah.
If you're Chris Hayes, it's perpetually 2008 and you're excited for Obama to, he's like pajama, if they gave Pajama Boy a show on MSNBC.
Anyone else remember Pajama Boy?
Yeah.
I remember Pajama Boy.
I remember him promoting Obamacare.
That's right.
I remember that.
Okay, final thoughts, guys.
We have a debate coming up in about 12 days.
I don't know if this moves the needle too much, but for independent voters who saw it, I don't think it did anything for Kamala.
Final thoughts, guys.
Charlie, I'm happy that you finally have college football again, even though there is a player in college football getting his ninth year of eligibility, which I do feel somewhat undermines the college football concept a little bit.
To be fair, he was hurt for like three of them, and then there was the COVID year, and then he had a red shirt.
Okay, but... Alright, alright.
This guy is going to be playing college football across more than two presidential administrations.
That is amazing.
This guy is in his ninth year of college football playing for Mario Cristobal down in Miami.
Pretty amazing.
Ninth year of college football.
I mean, his injury that he went through is pretty savage.
He had to have, like, nails screwed into his knee.
It was pretty aggressive.
Final thoughts, Tyler?
I don't think Chris Hayes needs to go to Fat Camp.
They have drugs for this now.
They released an entire South Park about it.
If Cartman can get skinny... Ozempic?
It's just Ozempic.
MSNBC... I'm surprised MSNBC doesn't have an Ozempic policy.
You know, like, imagine if instead of all the COVID stuff we did to, like, lockdown, if we just did a national, like, everyone should lose 20 pounds, because that would have helped a lot more than all the lockdowns.
It was just a risk factor to be overweight.
National Ozempic Initiative.
Except that it's, like, weird and creepy for other reasons.
He's definitely eating more hot dogs than Rachel Maddow.
Can't argue with that.
Jack, final thoughts?
Again, I just keep going back to it.
She didn't do what she needed to do.
All of this really will do is serve to prevent Trump from having that attack line at the debate in 12 days of saying she's never done any interviews.
Now, he could say she's only ever done one interview, but I think I would rate this as a W because what the Trump campaign has been able to do here is successfully force her out of hiding. She's been in hiding since she got
into this race. And by the way, there are still some very serious questions about how she
got into the race in the first place. And CNN tried very hard, Denabash trying hard to give it the
illusion of a serious conversation about what exactly happened with Joe Biden. But then again, no
curiosity as to so who's running the country right now? Do you talk to Joe Biden on a regular
basis? Because we're told he's off at the beach. You seem to be driving around Georgia in a bus. Who's
actually defending the nation while here. Also, haven't you kind of been the president the
entire time? Well, no, no, no, you and I know that. But of course, CNN and, you know, the average voter
out there doesn't hear those things and has questions as to who actually is in charge. And so I don't
think that again, that she did what she needed to do. And I think there's still massive questions
and so much area that Trump can exploit and will just because it's Donald Trump, certainly be exploiting
