Will Red States Step Up To Prosecute Hunter? with Libby Emmons and Kash Patel
Why are we relying on Joe Biden's Department of Justice to hold Hunter accountable? Kash Patel would like to know. There are about twenty-five red states, and all of them have their own state DOJs and attorneys general. Kash joins Andrew with a proposal for forcing the Hunter case forward, as well as a response to CNN's release of the Trump audio tape. Plus, Libby Emmons joins to react to NBC's wild "fact check" that Pride marchers chanting "we're coming for your children" is no big deal, because they've actually been saying it for years.Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Andrew Fills In For Charlie00:01:55
Hey, everybody, welcome to the Charlie Kirk Show.
This is Andrew Colvett, executive producer of the Charlie Kirk Show, filling in for Charlie, who had a last-minute assignment.
On this episode, we talk with Libby Emmons, editor-in-chief of Human Events and the Post-Millennial.
We dive into a very troubling NBC quote-unquote fact check of the Pride Marchers and why they're chanting, We're Coming for Your Children.
Also, we talked with Kash Patel, who had a first-hand account inside the White House involving all the allegations coming at him from Mark Milley, from Merrick Garland, David Weiss.
We talk about it all right here with Cash himself.
And by the way, he calls out Red State AGs and DAs.
You're not going to want to miss it.
He names some names.
Buckle up.
Here we go.
Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
I want to thank Charlie.
He's an incredible guy.
His spirit, his love of this country, he's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created.
Turning point USA.
We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
That's why we are here.
Brought to you by the Loan Experts I Trust, Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage at andrewandTodd.com.
Welcome back to the Charlie Kirk Show.
This is Andrew Colvett, executive producer of the Charlie Kirk Show.
Honored to be with you today, filling in for Charlie Kirk.
I want to bring on the great Libby Emmons, the editor-in-chief of the post-millennial and human events.
She's got two hats she wears.
She's doing a fantastic job.
Welcome to the show, Libby.
Hey, thanks, Andrew.
Glad to be here.
Yeah, honored to have you.
Some important stuff I want to get to.
First item of forbids is this crazy NBC story.
Restoring Shame And Taboo00:12:40
So, over the weekend, Pride Marchers in New York City were caught on camera.
I mean, the whole thing was basically like Sodom and Gomorrah.
We touched on this briefly on the show on Monday.
The weekend was crazy.
I mean, Pride Month really has devolved into this public display of degeneracy and men in leather straps whipping each other with all sorts of untold devices.
They have puff faces.
Pup faces.
There's furries running around.
I mean, I don't even tend to understand.
I just found out that there's things called sex clubs.
The whole world going the hell on hand baskets.
Yeah, Hunter Biden apparently wrote him off on his taxes.
I'm getting an education here via Hunter Biden and via the Pride Marchers about just how degenerate our society can really be.
I just have three kids.
I work and I live and I breathe for a living.
That's like literally my life.
So when these people come out with these sex, I'm like, how do you have time for this?
Like, you're honestly, I mean, Hunter's got a lot of kids.
Seriously.
Anyway, so let's just play the cut here.
Cup 24.
So, Libby, they're here and they're queer and they're coming for our children.
Now, this, I think, triggered a lot of people, especially in conservative, the conservative media sphere, because it reminded us of the San Francisco Gay Men's Choir, where they said, We're coming for you, we're going to convert your children.
We'll convert your children.
Now, we posted that video on social media and it quickly got taken down by Google, YouTube.
We got a strike on our account.
I mean, they went full.
Yeah, they went full crazy on that.
Now we have a new development, and we have this graphic.
NBC News, We're Coming for Your Children, Channel.
New York City drag march elicits outrage, but activists say it's taken out of context.
Now, they say it's taken out of context because that they've been saying this for years, Libby, and it's actually intentionally provocative because they're taking back the language from the slurs used against the LGBT community.
Fill us in, Libby.
What's your reaction?
What's behind the scenes here?
Yeah, so this clip went out.
Anyone who took a look at this clip on social media could be rightfully aghast to see all of these half-naked New Yorkers wandering around Tompkins Square Park screaming that they're coming for your children.
A lot of people posted about this.
Tim Cast got, I think, you know, millions of views from this footage.
And we see the pasties and the naked people and everything like that.
And then NBC comes out with this story that's almost more shocking than the clip itself, saying that the pride revelers and the drag queens and everybody aren't really coming for your children.
They're just trying to retake a slur that's been used against them.
I don't think that anyone really buys that at this point after the past few years when we have seen drag queens in libraries literally coming for children, reading books to them about how your body isn't real and can be magically transformed into the opposite sex.
We see teachers coming out and saying that it's their job to keep students' gender identity secret from parents.
You know, watching these pride revelers in Tompkins Square is and having them say that they're coming for our children is almost as scary as when Joe Biden says it from the White House lawn.
And I think conservatives have certainly learned a lesson, which is when people tell you who they are, listen.
That's right.
Now, I think this argument, I actually predicted this because we've actually been putting up with these pride festivities and this basic public degeneracy for a long time.
I think a lot of us were cowed into silence.
A lot of us didn't realize how bad it was.
And what happened was these people crossed a line.
At some point, you know, and I think what happened with Dylan Mulvaney and the trans issue really sort of like woke us up.
And we saw that they were coming not just for their free expression of public degeneracy in open air, but they were coming for our children.
So that's why this line is so key.
And once they crossed that line, we started looking under other rocks.
We started looking under, we started saying, oh, hey, Target, now you're selling tuck-friendly bathing suits for children.
And you are putting this prominently at the front of your store.
Now, so now Target's a target.
We see the Biden administration, the federal government has been doing the same thing.
They are sending money out around the world that is, you know, essentially for gender nonsense and to indoctrinate kids around the world with the gender nonsense.
There are foundations like one called GLISSI that goes out there and funds stuff all around the world.
And they get backing from Disney and Target and a host of other American corporations.
There are, however, and I do think it's important to note that there is a, I think, probably a large contingent within the gay community, trans individuals as well, who are looking at this and saying, guys, hold on, stop saying you're going for the children and maybe back off the kids.
These are adult parties for adults.
That's what they should be.
You know, I was in New York over the weekend, in fact, with my son, and we were staying in a neighborhood right where pride was happening.
We walked out the door on that Sunday and we did not head toward pride.
You know, we walked the other way.
And I was like, this is nothing for children.
We're not going to go over and check that out.
You're 13.
That's not for you.
And we encountered a moving billboard truck from Gays Against Rumors that was saying, this is not for kids.
Take your kids home.
Pride is not for kids.
Now, for decades, we had people, gay rights activists telling us outright, hey, for centuries, you have been assuming that if we're gay, we're pedophiles.
We're not.
We are looking for a normal existence.
We want to get married and have children.
Just accept us as part of the normal scene.
That happened.
Obergefell went through.
Gay marriage became normal.
You know, all of us probably know gay couples, gay couples with kids, etc.
And it started to really get normalized until this whole gender identity thing and the massive increase in pride activities where, yes, they did start really coming for kids and saying that they were coming for kids.
In fact, there's a brand new politically correct term for pedophile.
They call themselves minor attractive persons.
There are arguments by academics who say that this is just the way that you're born.
There's nothing you can do about this.
If you're attracted sexually to children, you know, God forbid, then you were born that way.
I think all of this does a great disservice to the gay community that's just trying to exist in a normal way.
And it's really too bad.
There's going to be backlash.
And we're already seeing backlash against that.
I saw an article today in the Daily Wire where they were criticizing Star Wars, I think, for having hired a trans actor.
And it's like, there was no allegations against this person.
It's just that they got hired as though for some reason, people who engage in this lifestyle don't get to have jobs.
Yeah.
I mean, I have a little bit more cynical take on it.
I think when you give an inch, they'll take a mile.
And that was always going to be the end result.
Now, Libby, I want to get back to what we were talking about.
I just want to briefly kind of put a pin on what we were just discussing.
I want, at least I wanted probably five years ago to believe that you could peacefully coexist, adults could be adults.
But I'm more cynical than that now, especially when it comes to these pride marches and things of that nature, because I think that they understood, just like the Soviets did, just like the, you know, Mao's China, that you have to go after the children to convert an entire society to an ideology.
I think it was an inevitability that when you give an inch, they will take a mile.
When we stopped stigmatizing certain things like public indecency and, you know, West Hollywood and New York City and Seattle and everywhere else, San Francisco, that when we stopped stigmatizing those things, that inevitably was going to spread into the rest of society, your response.
Oh, I actually agree with you fully.
I think we need to bring shame back.
I think taboo is important.
It keeps us in line.
When there's things that we know we perhaps have proclivities to do, and we know that they are not acceptable to do them in public or to brag about them, I think that's a good thing.
I don't think we should go out there being always so proud of our own degeneracy.
That's a shame that that has happened.
And yeah, no, I'm with you on that.
I don't want to see a bunch of grown men in puppy masks with whipping each other.
I don't want to see all of these pictures of naked cyclists exposing themselves at the pride in Seattle or the stuff that was going on in Toronto.
We had Katie Davis Court out in Seattle.
We had Beth Beche out in Toronto capturing ridiculous footage of these adults who think it's just their right to, you know, show their nudity off to children as though this is okay.
We saw all kinds of support for this on social media.
People saying, like, oh, you know, they see worse things at home.
No, they, no, they don't.
They don't see worse stuff at home than grown men shaking their junk.
Like, that's nuts.
And if that's what's going on at home, then home is also a problem.
Years ago, there was a piece that came out in the Washington Post from a woman who was talking about how important it is to her to take her kids to pride and show her kids all of the kinky sex stuff that was going on in the street.
This is not at all appropriate.
None of that should be going on in the street.
And in fact, one thing that I think is overlooked is this idea that this movement is called pride, because pride is one of the seven deadly sins.
I don't know what there is particularly to be proud of about your sexual lifestyles or why they need to be advertised to everyone in public.
I'm also not super in PDA.
Like, you know, I totally agree.
I think, you know, I'm a Christian.
I believe that so much of life actually comes down to a fundamental issue of dealing with the problem of shame.
And I think the Christian religion, yes, absolutely.
We have shame.
We covered ourselves, or Adam did, with, you know, a fig leaf to cover himself from the all-seeing eye of God, right?
And so I think when you see what these pride marchers are doing, it's actually a tacit admission that they feel shame about certain aspects of their sexuality, certain aspects of their behavior, and they are ravenous in their fight and their push to remove this sense of guilt and shame.
And they look at society as the source of that shame.
And I actually think what you're seeing now, because if you look at social media, everybody's like, oh, you conservatives, such prudes.
You're so obsessed with this topic.
Come on, get off it.
You're obsessed.
What's, you know, and actually, I think what all of it is, what we're doing is we're just restoring a sense of taboo, a sense of shame for things that are actually shameful.
And that's really healthy.
Yeah, I think that stuff keeps us in line.
That's why we have a civil and ordered society is when you know the way that you can behave in public and the way that you cannot behave in public.
We have torn down those barriers to such an extent that grown men think that it's permissible to shake it for kids in public.
That's not okay.
Libby Evans, the post-millennial.
America is the first nation in history founded on the idea of a natural God-given rights and on political principles proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence of liberty, equality, and limited government.
Indictment Documents And Iran00:14:54
That's what my friends at Hillsdale College want you to join them in remembering our founding principles on our nation's birthday this July 4th.
You can do so by taking three simple steps.
Go to charlieforhillsdale.com and sign your pledge to read the Declaration on July 4th.
Then read the Declaration on the 4th, either on your own or with your family and friends.
Look, I'm going to take this pledge, and I hope you will too.
If we are going to save our country in its current crisis, we need to remind ourselves, our children, and our fellow citizens of the founding principles that are a source of America's greatness.
When you sign your pledge today, you'll receive a free commemorative copy of the Declaration of Independence from our friends at Hillsdale College.
So visit charlieforhillsdale.com.
That is charlieforhillsdale.com.
Check it out.
Wonderful resource, charlie4hillsdale.com.
Joining me now is the one and only Cash Batel, author of Government Gangsters that he has finally extracted from the bowels of the deep state.
And it is, Cash is going to have to tell us about that book a little bit more because, man, if there was ever a time in our nation's history, everything that we're seeing with Hunter Biden right now, that book is prescient.
And he has a first-hand account from inside the White House on it.
Cash, welcome to the show.
Hey, thanks so much for having me.
And you're right.
It took me nine months in a federal lawsuit to clear the manuscript from these government gangsters.
And I guess there's a reason they buried it and wormholed it, but I wasn't going to bend the knee.
And I think there's a reason President Trump called it the roadmap to winning back the White House and saving our democracy in terms of calling out the corrupt actors at the top: Milley, Haspel, Rosenstein, Ray, Garland, Barr.
The list goes on.
But more importantly, I have personal stories on how they failed America.
Even more important than that, how to solve it, how to resolve the issues so we have an uncorrupt DOJ and FBI.
So we don't have a two-tier system of justice.
So we don't have a weaponized intel community.
And we don't have generals in the military wearing their democratic badges of honor and serving the military apolitically.
So you can pre-order right now at governmentgangsters.com.
I really appreciate you letting me mention that.
It's skyrocketing up the charts and also signing copies and personalizing messages there.
Definitely get that, guys.
I mean, I'm so glad you're on the show today, Cash, because you did have a firsthand account of something that's in the news right now, really.
I mean, you were around the president.
You saw his posture towards these endless foreign wars.
And, you know, something that's come up is, and guys, throw up the New Yorker article again.
This New Yorker article, I think, is really important.
This came out in July 15th, I believe.
And it was New Yorker saying, you're going to have an effing war, Mark Milley's fight to stop Trump from striking Iran.
Now, this CNN tape, Cash, that got leaked, selectively leaked, was from a meeting at Bedminster six days after that article was published.
Six days after.
Now, so Trump is obviously sitting in there.
He's looking at the New Yorker coverage because Trump obsesses about this stuff.
He's got it and he's print this out for me.
So you hear him shuffling papers.
Now, Mark Meadows in the Chief's Chief talks about that article.
He also talks about a report from Millie that outlined an attack on Iran.
Now, what's your take as a first-person witness of Trump's posture towards Iran?
Was Milley pushing for it or was Trump pushing for it?
Cash.
So look, Milley is one of the government gangsters I outline in the book.
And I outline him because he did his job, for instance, on the night of the Baghdadi raid apolitically and acted as a commanding officer should, or I should say, a chairman should.
And the reason he's such an abysmal failure is because of quotes like this, because he went out there and said, oh, I'll call my Chinese counterpart.
If America ever attacks you, I'll give you a heads up.
Because he takes time in the throngs of a national security crisis to go out and leak to the New Yorker and every other outlet that there is to get a fake news narrative out there so he can keep his job.
This guy would literally call me when I was chief of staff at the DOD in the middle of the night and ask me if Trump was going to fire him.
My response to him was simple, as I outlined in the book.
Why don't you just do your job?
Who cares if you get fired?
I don't care if I do.
And I just wanted to put that background on Mark Milley because connecting that to the indictment and the timing sequence you just outlined, we called the shot a few weeks ago.
Me as a former federal prosecutor, was like, wait a second, they don't have this document.
They're talking about it in the indictment, but once you read into it, it doesn't match with the charging documents and the counts that were outlined later in the indictment.
So then I called DOJ's bluff on that.
And it's no surprise that on the heels of the breaking news about Hunter Biden, his corrupt prosecution, literally being hamstrung by Merrick Garland, this story breaks out.
And you have Trump's audio unlawfully leaked by the same DOJ while their indictment is imploding.
And what do they tell us?
They say, oh, Trump was waving around this document, but not even the fake news can muster enough disinformation to say he was actually doing it.
They said it's indicative of it, or it seems to be the case, because they know, as you know, a person who's been in hundreds of these meetings, and by the way, I was in the meetings with Milley, the SecDef, and POTUS at the end of the administration talking about this subject.
It's no surprise that they leaked this audio.
But when you listen to it, President Trump, in his typical fashion, jokes around, is holding up a bunch of papers, and you can absolutely tell that he does not have the document in question.
And here's why.
One, President Trump was the guy that ended the forever wars.
Mark Milley and his sycophantic cronies at the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff wanted us in those forever wars.
So do you really think that it was Mark Milley or President Trump that said, hey, let's go attack Iran?
Or do you really think it was the same Mark Milley who wanted his ego glorified and his job kept and leaked to the New Yorker that was the one that said, hey, maybe we should go attack Iran?
I think the credibility and the pattern speaks for itself.
And people need to realize that there are no coincidences in government between Hunter Biden's laptop, Hunter Biden's corruption, and Mark Milley and this instance that we have here.
Yeah, and Cash, what you're talking about is so important.
We've touched on it in the previous hour.
The fact that this document is not even part of the underlying charges that Jack Smith is bringing against Trump, right?
So it was selected, but it's, but if you read the indictment, which I have, this recording is used as a foundational element to sort of make the case against Trump, right?
Using this espionage act.
Now, putting aside the fact, Cash, that, I mean, you've made this point on the show that he had the right to declassify documents.
He declassified a lot of this stuff provably before he left the White House.
This was a document dispute with the white, you know, with the librarians in the federal government, right?
And this would never have been brought against Joe Biden.
It wouldn't have been a brought, these charges wouldn't have been brought against Bill Clinton, whatever.
I mean, we know that they weren't brought against Hillary Clinton for doing much worse when she didn't have the power to declassify documents.
Putting all that aside, Cash, as a former federal prosecutor, what does this do to the case?
Now, outside of the media spin, now, can we get a fair trial for Trump?
I don't know.
We'll find out.
But actually, break down the law.
They use this as the cornerstone.
They've used it as a character assassination attempt against President Trump, leaking this through CNN.
They're doing the same thing they always do.
If this is not part of the charges against Trump, does the case fall apart?
Was it already in tatters before?
Break it down for us.
Yeah, I think based on the Presidential Records Act, the president's universal authority to declassify documents and the fact that they did not charge him.
Here's the kicker.
The government, when they had the opportunity to charge the president under the unlawful disclosure of classified information, which is a statute that arose in the 50s, they chose not to do that.
And the classification system didn't exist until the 50s when that statute was written in Congress.
This DOJ went back 110 years to a statute that revolves national defense information.
And literally, we used it to prosecute sailors who swiped maps off of boats.
So they had the chance.
They shot their shot and they said in their own indictment by not charging President Trump with unlawfully possessing classified information, they have admitted that he didn't possess it.
And now what do they do?
They have this recording out there that looks like, oh my God, President Trump is the worst thing in the world waving around this document.
Except here's the kicker.
They don't have it because he never had it.
So now their indictment is imploding, and the only thing they can do is leak to the fake news mafia, CNN and New York Times, in hopes of dirtying up the jury pool and just making Trump so quote unquote unelectable because of this alleged nefarious conduct.
But here's the other thing: as the deputy director of national intelligence, documents that might have spoken to this level of action and authority in Iran would never have been left with POTUS.
I know because I briefed him.
I know because I was in the Oval Office as chief of staff of DOD when Mark Milley was running his mouth about wanting to go to war with X, Y, and Z.
The documents are kept not in the Oval.
They are kept back at DOD, back at DNI headquarters when they are that sensitive.
President Trump is briefed on everything, reads everything, but he doesn't keep this stuff.
It was that simple.
Why doesn't anyone ask anyone else in the room whether we ever actually just said, oh, I'm going to keep this document?
Because it never happened, which means it's a logical, factual impossibility for Trump to have ever had this document in the first place.
And DOJ is literally trying this case in the media because they know they've overreached and they've got many other problems with the indictment.
Yeah, I want to play the clip for everybody just so everybody's caught up to speed.
Let's go ahead and play cut 37.
This is CBS confirming what Cash was just talking about: 37.
I think that the special counsel will be able to use this recording very effectively before a jury because he can argue that they've captured on tape the defendant narrating his own alleged criminal activity.
And CBS News has learned that Trump has not been charged for keeping the document he's talking about on that tape.
Special Counsel Jack Smith's office declined to answer our questions about the Iran memo or the audio tape.
Ah, just snuck it in there real quick that it's not part of the allegations.
Cash, I think there was a tell in that clip.
The first part of that clip is some talking head saying, like, I think the prosecutor is going to be able to use this very effectively against Trump because he's admitting his own criminality.
Yeah, look, what they're talking about is consciousness of guilt, and it has to be a certain legal threshold for an evidentiary standard that they're not going to meet because the defense is going to go in there and be like, where's the document?
What is he talking about?
Do you, the United States government, have this super sensitive document?
If you don't, game over.
Yeah, I think it's, I mean, you talk about the physical evidence.
This truly is an important cog in their whole case.
It's a foundational element that they're admitting now that they don't have.
So essentially, they're just upset that Trump wasn't initially handing over everything that they asked for, and there was a dispute.
And I think the case is becoming extraordinarily powerful that this is election interference.
I mean, this is essentially taking Trump off the chessboard and they're moving first in character assassination.
Hey, everybody, Charlie Kirk here.
Mike Lindell's a great American patriot.
Don't you agree?
We need to support Mike Lindell.
The FBI went after him.
It's terrible.
Well, look, one way we can support Mike Lindell against these tyrants, these despots, these dictators, is MyPillow.
MyPillow is having a massive closeout sale.
It's happening on their all-season slippers.
People continually make MySlippers the number one selling MyPillow product.
So let's do it right now.
Go to mypillow.com, promo code Kirk, to support my friend Mike Lindell, great patriot.
MySlippers have an exclusive four-layer design that you won't find anywhere else in any other slipper.
The patented layers make these slippers ultra comfortable and extremely durable.
Just go to mypillow.com and click on the radio podcast square to grab a pair of the all-season slippers for $25.
Enter promo code Kirk or call 800-875-0425.
That is mypillow.com, promo code Kirk.
They will not last long, so please order now.
They help relieve stress on your feet and they do a great job.
Mypillow.com, promo code Kirk.
Cash, I'm going to play this clip.
I saw you posting on Truth about something related to this.
Like at 13.
So, will this prompt you to do an impeachment inquiry?
Well, you apparently don't follow me on Twitter because yesterday I laid out very, very clearly by July 6th, because of the allegations from the IRS, because of the whistleblowers and the DOJ, Garland, what he is saying and what David Weiss are saying privately are two different things.
Right.
And if it comes true what the IRS whistleblower is saying, we're going to start impeachment inquiries on the attorney general.
Cash, just real quick, you're upset about this.
You think this should have happened a long, long ago, am I right?
Yeah, I mean, Congress, I've been giving them the roadmap.
I've been offering assistance.
I'm not the only one.
It's not about me.
I'm just saying, what does Congress want to be doing for the American people since we don't have DOJ and FBI?
We have the evidence.
We have the receipts.
We have, let me give it, look at it this way: Trump Tower meeting, right?
Adam Schiff wanted everybody under the sun there investigated, and it was a bogus nothing happened meeting.
Here we have six law enforcement officials, U.S. attorneys, FBI agents saying completely opposite things from the attorney general.
Why can't we impeach him already?
Yeah, I think so much of this cash hinges on this David Weiss person, this character that was endorsed by Democrats in the state of Delaware, right?
Which is a big red flag.
He signed a letter to Congress saying Garland didn't interfere with his investigation.
Garland's saying that he didn't interfere with his investigation.
Yet we have these IRS whistleblowers now saying something completely different.
So somebody is not telling the truth.
Now, my money is on the powers that be.
We're definitely weighing the scales in Hunter's favor and interceding in ways that they shouldn't have.
But, Cash, you posted something on Truth Social kind of related to all this impeachment talk of impeaching Garland.
Jim Jordan is saying that impeaching President Trump or President Biden is now on the table, that they are looking into it with all these bribery allegations.
Now, we know from the IRS whistleblowers things that Hunter Biden got a sweetheart deal, that they were hampered in their investigation from the DOJ.
At least those are the allegations.
Crimes, Truth Social, And Marco00:04:43
Now, let's put up 62.
This is Cash on Truth Social.
He says, Are there any state AGs or DAs that are willing to prosecute Hunter Biden and family for the crimes they have committed in their red state?
They do it to real Donald Trump.
Why are y'all so afraid to act?
You got 24 hours to get moving.
Then I'm naming names right here on Truth Social Man up.
Now, Cash, this is something we talked about on this show.
I believe you and Charlie actually sort of hashed this out on the show one day, something we've talked about a lot.
We know that the Marco Polo report has a lot of information in it.
It's 140 business crimes, 191 sex crimes, and 128 drug crimes.
And you can actually, by the way, just doing a little plug here for Marco Polo, throw the guy some support here.
Marco Polo.support.
Cash, what are you getting at?
What do you want to see happen?
Yeah, you're right.
Look, that's why I'm glad I'm on Charlie's show with you because we hatched this plan way back when we said, okay, we know we don't have the DOJ and FBI.
We know they're corrupt.
We know Congress is not going to do everything we want them to do, even though we've laid out the roadmap and showed them the receipts about Merrick Garland not lying and Chris Ray wormholing evidence of corruption at his FBI and tanking the Hunter Biden investigation.
So we have to remind people: every state has a law enforcement agency.
Every county has a district attorney.
Don't believe me.
Look at the guy in New York City prosecuting President Trump and look at what they're trying to do to him in some DA in Georgia on some election nonsense.
These people are acting in blue states based on bogus charges.
Why can't we do it in red states where we have attorney generals?
You just outlined Hunter Biden has committed or alleged to have committed crimes in what, 20 some states?
And I did say on Truth Social, I was going to start naming names.
But you know what?
Instead of Truth Social, I'm going to name them right here.
We have three states where I believe that they should at least be investigating Hunter Biden for crimes committed within their jurisdiction.
Arkansas, Missouri, and South Carolina.
That's Bailey, Griffin, and I can't now, of course, I can't remember the name of the third AG off the top of my head.
But those guys should have been paying a grand jury long ago.
Sorry?
Oh, our team will pull those up.
Say the states again, Cash.
Arkansas, Missouri, South Carolina.
That's just a starting point.
And I'm not asking them to go investigate the entire Biden crime family syndicate, but not just in the Marco Polo reporting, but in the Senate reporting from two years ago, the Senate put out a report that said Hunter Biden had paid dozens of women internationally and throughout America in a possible human sex trafficking operation.
Every transaction from every single different state is prosecutable in that separate state.
Are we to believe that of all the drug charges, of all the gun stuff, of all the prostitution, of all the sex trafficking, human trafficking, of all the financial fraud cases and activity, one Red State Attorney General can't find one transaction or one illegality to prosecute Hunter Biden?
That is a farce.
These people are as feckless, if not worse, than the current DOJ and FBI leadership.
I'm not saying every one of them has jurisdiction to act, but I find it hard and impossible to believe that a single one of them doesn't.
Yeah, I mean, the man was a walking crime trail, and it does lead you to believe that there are multiple avenues to pursue this to uncover deeper and deeper crimes, right?
I mean, we know now from the IRS whistleblower that Hunter Biden was writing off prostitutes on his taxes.
He was writing off sex clubs.
I'm getting an education.
I didn't even know there was like a sex club thing.
Like you just go sign up for a country club, but apparently Hunter Biden was in on the scoop.
He was writing off prostitute hotel rooms and lots of other things.
And by the way, we were looking into some of these state-by-state allegations, Cash, when we were texting with your team.
And, you know, there's a lot of pictures in Florida, too.
I mean, this would be an opportunity for Governor DeSantis to really score some serious points here if he can get to the bottom of it.
Here's a kicker.
Prostitution is literally a crime in over 40 states in the United States of America, including Florida.
Are you telling me you can't prosecute this guy for prostitution every single time he does it?
What if it was Charlie Kirk or Don Jr. that we were talking about instead of Hunter Biden?
We'd have 47 DAs and 26 state attorney generals prosecuting them for the crime of the century.
But Hunter Biden doesn't do it once.
He does it a million times over and keeps getting away with it.
The federal judge in this case must stay and reject this plea agreement to these prosecutions.
Kash Patel, the man himself, that was excellent, Cash.
Support The Work Today00:00:44
Red State DAs, you're on notice.
Thanks so much for listening, everybody.
If you like what we do here on the show, if you support it, if you are addicted to the content that we're producing, consider supporting us.
Go to charliekirk.com/slash support.
That's charliekirk.com/slash support.
Get behind the work that we do.
It means the world to us.
It makes us bulletproof.
Also, consider going to your favorite podcast provider, ranking us five stars, leaving a review.
It really helps us in the charts.
Make sure more people hear what we have to say.
It's more important than ever.
We really appreciate it.
We'll talk to you soon.
For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to CharlieKirk.com.