All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
May 10, 2023 - The Charlie Kirk Show
35:24
Tucker's Coming Back — On Twitter with Rep. Anna Paulina Luna
Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Tucker Joins Twitter And Rumble 00:10:08
Hey everybody, welcome to the Charlie Kirk Show.
This is Andrew Colvett, executive producer of the Charlie Kirk Show.
Honored to be with you today.
We have an action-packed hour one.
Literally, we cover four stories in depth.
We start with Tucker's major announcement that he's coming to Twitter.
I explain my take on it and why I think he should also incorporate Rumble.
Then we talk about James Comer, House Oversight, and their bombshell press conference.
And I explain, even though we are all waiting for people to be arrested in handcuffs and shackles, this was an important step to make.
I walk you through it.
We also talk about Eugene Carroll, the crazy rapist sexy lady that got awarded $5 million and why that's such a farce.
And we also talk about George Santos.
Lots to go through, lots to unpack.
You're not going to want to miss it.
Right here on the Charlie Kirk Show.
Buckle up.
Here we go.
Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campuses.
I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
I want to thank Charlie.
He's an incredible guy.
His spirit, his love of this country, he's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created.
Turning point USA.
We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
That's why we are here.
Brought to you by the Loan Experts I Trust, Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage at andrewandTodd.com.
So I want to start with Tucker.
The Tucker news is, I think, earth-shattering.
I don't think there's when Fox made the move to pull him off the air.
Now, I very carefully did not say fire him because reportedly they are still paying him.
They are paying him to keep him quiet and to keep him sidelined.
Well, it doesn't look like that's going to work.
So let's start just first and foremost with some of what he had to say.
He dropped his second video since the debacle with Fox, the second one on Twitter.
And now, interestingly, enough, he says he's going to be coming back to Twitter.
That's where he's going to be doing these segments.
We don't know how long they're going to be.
We don't know if it's an hour-long format.
We don't know if it's going to be minute by minute.
But it is going to be on Twitter.
Now, Elon has come out and he gave him kind of a chilly response.
So this has a lot of people talking.
He says, on this platform, unlike the one-way street of broadcasts, people are able to interact, critique, and refute whatever he or anyone may say.
And of course, anything misleading will get community notes.
Now, if you're not a Twitter native, Elon's tenure on Twitter has one very dramatic difference from old Twitter, and that's called community notes.
That's where they don't remove content or censor it, but they do add notes to it that get voted up or down by users of the platform.
And so you might see something from a Democrat nowadays that is absolutely a lie.
And guess what?
You'll see it in community notes.
And that really offends the leftists that have never been subjected to this kind of critique.
It's not censorship, but it is a different context.
So Elon Musk is coming right out of the gate saying, you will get community notes too as well, Tucker.
It says, Tucker is subject to the same rules and rewards of all content creators.
Rewards mean subscriptions and advertising revenue share, which is a function of how many people subscribe in the advertising views associated with his content.
I hope that many others, particularly from the left, also choose to be content creators on this platform.
So let's play a couple of these clips really quick in case you missed it.
Let's just a little smattering here.
Let's play cut 80.
Tucker last night in his second video drop on Twitter since being ousted from Fox.
Hey, it's Tucker Carlson.
You often hear people say the news is full of lies, but most of the time that's not exactly right.
Much of what you see on television or read the New York Times is in fact true in the literal sense.
It could pass one of the media's own fact checks.
Lawyers would be willing to sign off on it.
In fact, they may have.
But that doesn't make it true.
It's not true.
At the most basic level, the news you consume is a lie, a lie of the stealthiest and most insidious kind.
Facts have been withheld on purpose, along with proportion and perspective.
You are being manipulated.
Read between the lines of what he's saying, and you see it echoed also in Elon's statement.
He called broadcast media a one-way street.
He's saying on Twitter, you can interact with the content that is published there, which is true.
What this might mean is a tectonic shift away from what we have all known and grown up with and seen on the nightly news, that the broadcast media will dominate.
Well, not anymore necessarily.
When you fire, when you sideline somebody like Tucker Carlson, you are risking a seismic shift in the landscape of broadcast media.
Now, I'm going to play one more clip from Tucker's announcement here, and this is him saying that he's going to be doing it on Twitter.
And then I want to make a comment after this.
Cut 83.
You can't have a free society if people aren't allowed to say what they think is true.
Speech is the fundamental prerequisite for democracy.
That's why it's enshrined in the first of our constitutional amendments.
Twitter has long served as the place where our national conversation incubates and develops.
Twitter is not a partisan site.
Everybody's allowed here, and we think that's a good thing.
Starting soon, we'll be bringing a new version of the show we've been doing for the last six and a half years to Twitter.
We bring some other things too, which we'll tell you about.
But for now, we're just grateful to be here.
Free speech is the main right that you have.
Without it, you have no others.
See you soon.
All right.
So this is a summing it up.
He says he's going to be doing the same show that he's been doing for the last six and a half years on Fox, but he's going to be doing it on Twitter.
Okay.
Now, a lot of people thought this would be a breach of contract, but the other piece of this story is that Axios got a massive scoop yesterday.
His lawyers released a brief accusing Fox News of fraud and breach of contract.
Axios.
Notably, the letter alleges Fox broke an agreement with Carlson not to leak his private communications.
All of these video drops that we have been seeing of Tucker behind the scenes getting ready for some sort of hit or segment.
And the quote says, to take any adverse employment action against him.
The letter also alleges Fox broke promises not to settle with Dominion voting systems in a way which would indicate wrongdoing on the part of Carlson and not to take any actions in a settlement that would harm Carlson's reputation.
Well, Carlson is alleging that one of the board members of Fox News told him that he was fired as part of the Dominion lawsuit, the Dominion settlement.
So he's claiming that they are in breach.
Therefore, he's going guerrilla.
He's going gorilla straight to the people on Twitter.
Now, I want to make one note of this, that I don't think it's actually that smart to put all of our eggs in the Twitter basket.
Let me explain why.
Elon has been a free speech warrior.
I think a lot of people in this audience appreciate the things that Elon's done, but I think a lot of you are also skeptical.
He's got ties to China.
He's really into this weird kneer-link transhumanism thing.
He's also taken a direct attack at Substack, which is used by reporters like Matt Taibbi, who's been another free speech warrior.
So what's that about?
I think, honestly, when I look at the Elon Musk tenure at Twitter, the Substack thing stands out as a glaring hole in his resume, as something where he took sort of tyrannical power to target a smaller, what he deemed to be a competitor.
Now, you might say he has every right to do that, and perhaps he does, but is it in the spirit of building a larger ecosystem of free speech?
I don't think you can have a larger ecosystem of free speech if one outlet or platform attempts to dominate and squelch out all other platforms, namely Rumble.
What is surprising, we stream this show on Rumble every day.
We like the guys over at Rumble, they're building something truly remarkable and special.
It's still new, they're working out some of the kinks, but it is a great free speech platform.
In fact, I would say a lot of our critiques of the vaccine, a lot of our critiques of election integrity that were banned from other platforms, we would not have if it was not for Rumble.
Rumble became the incubator in lieu of Twitter.
Rumble became the safe haven for us to talk about outlawed speech, thought crimes, wrongthink.
Rumble was that.
Do not forget what Rumble gave us in the dark days of COVID, in the dark days of censorship.
Now, Elon Musk was a big part of liberating those dark times in those dark days.
And so, hats off to Mr. Musk.
But do not forget that it was actually Rumble that was there when nobody else was it, when Google was absolutely crushing us, crushing shows like this, crushing voices like Charlie Kirk.
I do not think it is smart to put all of our eggs in the Twitter basket in the Elon basket.
I will give credit where credit is due, but I will not put my eggs there.
So, listen, I think if Tucker wants to be the populist man of the people, he's got to look beyond Twitter, in my opinion.
So, I want to just make one point.
Elon Musk is a very mercurial individual.
He has been different at various times in his career as we've known him, right?
I mean, he was considered a liberal, a climate activist, if you will, not too long ago.
And now he says he would vote for Ron DeSantis in a presidential election, which is great.
And maybe this is where he stays.
The E. Gene Carroll Story 00:04:15
We just don't know.
The other point I want to make is that the finances for Twitter are very fragile, very fragile.
There's reports that he's losing millions of dollars a day, every single day.
And obviously, he's working to change that.
The question is: what if it goes bankrupt?
It really could.
I mean, I know Elon Musk is the richest man in the world, but at what point do you eventually throw up your hands and say, I'm not going to be throwing any more resources into this dumpster fire?
I don't know what that is.
And then maybe it gets taken over by anti-free speech actors.
Do you really want to put all your eggs in that basket?
Instead, why don't you support the community of free speech platforms that are coalescing all together and that might act as a hedge against something if the worst were to happen?
Okay, I want to talk about this E. Gene Carroll story.
I like to call her the creepy rapist sexy lady.
Let's go ahead and actually play that clip.
96, just to give you a little primer back on when she was on CNN with Anderson Cooper, and she said, I think rape is sexy.
Go ahead, 96.
The word rape carries so many sexual connotations.
This was not sexual.
It just, it hurt.
It just, what, it just, you know.
I think most people think of rape as a, I mean, it is a violent assault.
It is not.
I think most people think of rape as being sexy.
Let's take a short break.
Think of the fantasies.
We're just going to take a quick break.
If you can stick around, we'll talk more on the other side.
You're fascinating to talk to.
Yep.
That lady just got awarded $5 million from a New York jury for, not for rape, but for defamation and sexual assault at the hands of presumably Donald Trump.
Now, this is one of the most ridiculous lawsuits that I have ever seen or encountered.
And just for the record, I think New York juries should be prohibited from even making judgments on cases anymore.
The jury pool there is completely slanted, as it is in D.C. You get no justice.
There is no impartiality when you go to these deep blue, perverse jurisdictions.
It's just been proven true.
It's where justice goes to die.
So let me sum this up.
She says she forgot what year the rape took place.
Let's stop right there.
If you cannot remember the year that you are alleging that the former president of the United States raped you, there's no case.
You're done.
That should be thrown out on its face right there.
If you cannot remember what year it happened, it's done.
But let's also say that she was funded.
Her lawsuit was actually funded by Reid Hoffman, the guy who founded LinkedIn, who happens to be a absolute far-left, loony-toon, billionaire mega donor to the Democrat machine.
And then she claims she forgot about that in the deposition.
Let's go ahead and play cut 100.
Another thing that he and his lawyers have often spoken about is the lack of disclosure about a big Democratic donor funding part of this case.
Was there a reason it wasn't disclosed?
And did you view this as political in any way?
No.
I just completely forgot that he even existed.
In your deposition?
Yes, in my deposition.
Okay, so let's just run this down.
The lady forgot that this mega donor, mega billionaire Democrat machine operative, happened to be funding her lawsuit in the first place to get Trump.
And she just forgot about it.
And then she forgot which year she actually got raped.
Trump completely denies it.
She says rape is sexy.
She says she's going to prove him to true, she's going to sue him to prove that he did, in fact, rape her.
He says, okay, bring it on.
Then the New York jury says, yeah, he didn't rape you, but here's $5 million.
Fact Checking NAD Research Claims 00:02:30
Make it make sense.
The absolute state of our insane judicial system is just a laughing stock.
It's a laughing stock.
Trump has denied it.
He says he's going to appeal.
But nevertheless, I want to show you the cover of the New York Times today.
Oh, yeah.
It's creepy rapist sexy lady.
Are you feeling burned out and a little tired?
Look, I want to tell you about something that I've become a big believer in.
And if you do not know about it, you got to research it.
You could fact-check me.
It's NAD.
NAD is a precursor for your body to be able to create ATP, which is basically the life force of everything that you do.
And look, there's a lot of people out there that are promising energy and doing all this, but go do some research on NAD and go see actually how incredibly important it is for high performance to be able to go actually get it to the next level.
And so what does NAD stand for?
Well, try to take a note here.
It is nicotinamide adenonide dinucleotide.
I did that pretty well, don't you think?
NAD.
It's a coenzyme that is central to metabolism.
Again, don't take my word for it.
Go watch a YouTube video or two or three or four and go fact-check me on it.
I've been taking NAD for quite some time.
And people say, Charlie, how do you travel 2,700 days in a decade?
How do you do the 300 days a year?
How do you do that?
Look, it's not only because of this.
I eat well and do other things as well.
But if you look at NADH, especially when it combines with CoQ10 and marine collagen, it boosts your body's cellular function.
I would never tell you guys to go do something I myself did not do.
And Strong Cell has been able to put together a scientific breakthrough in cellular health replenishment that combines NADH, CoQ10, and marine collagen.
When you combine them together, you get mental clarity.
And that's a must for me.
It's not just that.
It's for vitality.
It helps your immune system.
It's all good stuff.
So go to strongcell.com forward slash Charlie today and see for yourself.
It's not a stimulant.
It doesn't contain any caffeine.
I'm talking about overall health from the cellular level.
NADH has been called the anti-aging enzyme that helps with so many issues like brain fog, short-term memory loss, blood pressure, heart disease, blood sugar retention, and so much more.
And look, it's not a magic pill.
It's like, oh, I'm going to start taking this and I'm going to be super smart.
No, no, it's an additive, an amplifier on people that want to get better.
But I could tell you, it makes a big difference.
I've personally seen undeniable benefits from taking Strong Cell and engaging with NAD every day.
Biden Family Evidence Revealed 00:15:07
So I had to partner with them.
I vetted them.
I checked out their ingredient profile.
And do yourself a favor and give Strong Cell a try.
Visit strongcell.com forward slash Charlie today and use promo code Charlie and you get a special 20% discount on your order.
Again, that's strongcell.com forward slash Charlie.
NAD is your body's ability to create ATP.
Don't believe me, go to WebMD, go to ScienceDirect, go to Nature Journal, NIH, YouTube.
It's all natural.
It's naturally occurring and you're giving your body more of what it already needs.
Use promo code Charlie.
Again, that's strongcell.com forward slash Charlie.
Don't forget your 20% discount by using promo code Charlie at checkout, strongsell.com slash Charlie.
Joining me now is Ana Paulina Luda from the House Oversight Committee and from the great state of Florida.
We're honored to have her.
Welcome to the show.
Thank you so much for making the time for us today.
We all watched with bated breath this morning as Chairman Comer and the rest made this, it made an appeal to the American public.
That's what I was watching, Congresswoman, when I saw what they were saying.
They were like, please pay attention to these receipts.
Pay attention to the evidence that we're putting forth to the American people because you don't seem very interested.
Why don't you tell us, Congresswoman, what you believe are the major findings from the House Oversight Committee and lay it out in as much detail as you can.
Well, first of all, in that initial hearing, I thought that Chairman Comer and Representative Donalds actually did a fabulous job in pointing out that the media has been complicit in, I think, running interference on behalf of the lustis-controlled administration that we're currently seeing out of the White House.
And I say that for a few reasons.
You know, they initially said when we started bringing forward this information that these were conspiracy theories.
They said we never get access to the bank records.
They basically poo pooed it.
And then as you know, during the Trump-Biden debate in 2020, Biden famously said that he and his family never received money from the CCP, right?
So he went on record and basically denied everything that we found and that was brought forward today.
So I think the important takeaway for this is that, one, we absolutely have bank transactions and evidence that the Biden family received payments from the Communist Chinese Party.
And I'm talking payments in the sums of millions of dollars.
These payments were replicated not just for China, but also for another foreign government in Romania that was done actually while Biden at the time was vice president.
So basically he was using his position to personally enrich himself and his family.
And it's important to note that we've only really subpoenaed four banks right now and we got all of this information.
We believe as of right now that there's upwards of 12 banks involved in all of this.
20 LLCs have been tied to these shell corporations in an effort to money launder.
And we have transactions and evidence of all of this.
So it is important that one, we do work together to disseminate this information to the American people because, you know, remember during Watergate, it was actually the media that brought that forward.
It wasn't even at the time Congress.
And yet we see right now that this administration is really being protected by the media.
So we've put forward this information and this is influence peddling.
It's obviously illegal.
And so it's our job on oversight to expose this for the American people.
Yeah, so you said, you said, I think this is an important point because I was, you know, I'm a part of all these group chats with all these influencers and these people.
And, you know, part of, I would say, one contingent within these chats were people saying, we knew all this.
We knew all this already.
You know, what's the big news?
You know, Comer hyped this up starting on Sunday with Maria Barda-Romo show.
He's been hyping it all up.
We knew all this.
What's going to happen next?
And I just want to caution you in the audience.
What they did was the equivalent on the House oversight.
What they did is the equivalent of forensic accounting.
What they now have, and I mean, feel free to step in, Congresswoman, but what you guys now have are the receipts, literally the receipts.
You subpoenaed four banks.
Now it sounds like there's eight more that you want to get into, but already there's at least $10 million in payments made to nine Biden family members.
Nine Biden family members to include children.
Okay.
So what we're talking about is there's a very big difference between speculating and then saying something and then having the evidence to back it up.
And as you know, the Biden family is very well protected legally, but we were able to get access to these bank records and to really these receipts by actually subpoenaing information from people that we knew were involved.
And so what we're finding now is not only did this family on multiple occasions lie to the American people, but it's important to note that when you're looking at it from a foreign policy perspective, when you're wondering why it is that this administration seems to be doing nothing except enabling China, meanwhile, we are literally hemorrhaging finances right now.
And our country is now, according to an article that I saw yesterday on a well-known news outlet, we are obviously in a very, very bad place economically speaking.
You know, we have proof of this.
And it's even more alarming to see that this is not just China involved.
They did the exact same thing with the government of Romania.
And we have evidence of that.
And so we brought their receipts.
What happens next is this has been something that I think Congress has for a number of presidents had issues with in the past.
And so we're going to be working on writing the legislation to ensure that this never happens again.
But we are not the DOJ.
And if the DOJ would get off their bus and do their jobs, I think that you would actually find that there'd be multiple people from this family being arrested.
Yeah, you know, it's such a good point.
I mean, this is this is this investigation into Hunter Biden has lasted longer than the United States involvement in World War II.
And they can't come up with anything.
Meanwhile, you guys have 100 days and a little motivation, and you guys pull all of these bank records.
You do the forensic accounting, you bring the receipts.
This is now elevated beyond mere allegations, speculations, or rumors.
This is now basically provable fact.
And you're asking that, you're asking a very, I think, very basic, good question.
What was the, what was in exchange for these payments?
Did the Biden family members provide or produce?
What businesses were there?
I mean, we had a reporter that came forward and was like, well, you know, I'm trying to basically speculate that Trump had done something similar, which was obviously completely false.
First of all, President Trump had a legitimate business.
The point is, is that Biden's, the Biden family, Joe Biden, has never had a legitimate business.
His business has been politics.
And so when you're seeing these massive transactions and you're seeing them coming from foreign governments like the Communist Chinese Party through shell corporations and companies of over 20 business dealings, no legitimate business conducts themselves like that.
And this is only two countries.
We do speculate that there's a third country involved, but I'll wait on touching on that until we can get more evidence.
Interesting.
Nice little tease there.
I want to play.
You mentioned Byron Donalds.
I want to mention, bring up this clip from him.
I thought he did a phenomenal job from the podium because, you know, Comer had to sort of lay out the big picture stuff.
And then a number of the House Oversight members came up and sort of highlighted different aspects of it.
And as soon as Byron got to the podium, I was like, man, he just brought in some crystal clear thinking right there.
Let's play Cut 78, Byron Donalds, talking about how this serves no legitimate purpose.
78.
Cycling through this many companies serves no legitimate purpose.
And as somebody who actually worked in banking, I did that long before I came here.
Whenever there was like this many companies just laying all over the place and you see wire transfers, cashier checks over here going to random members of the family for no apparent purpose at the size and velocity at which all of this was being conducted, the only logical conclusion of a financial professional is you are concealing money.
That's the only reason you set up a structure like this.
Concealing money.
That is the only reason you set up a structure like this.
Just wanted you to react to that clarity from Representative Donald's right there.
Also from the great state of Florida.
He is absolutely correct.
And what's crazy is it wasn't just done with China.
It was done with Romania, the exact same transactions.
So you have a scheme where a massive amount of money was wired.
The Biden family received a third of the cut.
It was shuffled through all of these different entities.
And then it was deposited into the accounts of multiple family members of his, to include children, which I'll be honest with you, I don't know what service a child could provide a foreign government like the Communist Chinese Party or Romania.
Yeah, it was probably energy consultation, high-level stuff.
I mean, this is what's funny.
I mean, to all those people out there that want to say this is, you know, this is a zero.
We knew all this.
We knew it already.
This is the type of information that you need.
This is the type of proof that you need to actually get convictions when you have a DOJ that will do everything in its power to actively thwart conservative investigations.
You need stuff that is so dead to rights that they can't ignore it.
Well, and there was also a whistleblower that came forward to Senator Grassley that actually talked about and apparently presented a document that showed that the FBI had proof that Biden was involved in this illegal activity, like actual evidence, and the FBI said on that document.
Yeah, there's a lot of flushing that we have to do.
But you need the proof in order to bring charges.
Exactly.
So I want to lay this out because I know our audience gets so frustrated at the fact.
And Congresswoman, I know you share this frustration.
We've talked offline.
When is somebody going to get arrested, indicted, whatever?
We need results from this.
Or else the well, like I've said before, you know, the only thing that we can do From our perspective in Washington, is bring forward the evidence and showcase it to the American people, but we don't have, we're not prosecutors, right?
And that's important to remember.
The DOJ has to pick up this mantle.
And so I do believe that we are, I mean, you're seeing it right now.
We are projected to take back the White House and the Senate in this upcoming election.
And with the ending of Title 42 with the economy, I think, and now this, I just don't see any world where the Biden's get re-elected.
But I do not think that there will be anything punitive until I think we have correct leadership out of the White House because ultimately they're blocking for their own right now.
Right.
You're absolutely right.
I mean, listen, the polling, you're right, is in our favor.
I think we have to play like we're 10 points behind.
You know, the get out the vote machine, the harvesting, the grassroots activism.
Well, exactly.
We have to build the machine to counter this because you're right.
The evidence is overwhelming.
The country's in an absolutely abysmal place.
And yeah, Title 42 is being revoked at the worst time.
So everything's fine.
What can we say?
Congressman, thank you for your time today and bringing the receipts.
Thank you for all your hard work on the Oversight Committee and everything else that you're involved in.
We will have you back soon.
That much I can be sure of.
Thanks so much.
Take care.
All right.
Bye-bye.
Look, you did the tough thing during the Chinese coronavirus.
You paid your people and pulled your business through the pandemic.
And now doing the tough thing could qualify you up to $26,000 per employee at covidtaxrelief.org.
Government funds are available to reward companies with two or more employees who stayed open during COVID.
This is not a loan, and you don't have to pay it back.
I know a lot of people that have benefited from this.
I think Congress appropriated way too much money.
This program is complicated, but nobody knows it better than the CPAs and tax experts at covidtaxrelief.org.
That is covidtaxrelief.org.
You pay nothing up front.
They do all the work and share a percentage of the cash they get you.
Businesses of all types, including nonprofits and churches, can qualify, including those who took PPP loans, even if you had an increase in sales.
You did the difficult thing for your employees during the virus.
Let covidtaxrelief.org help you get up to $26,000 per employee.
Visit covidtaxrelief.org.
That is covidtaxrelief.org, covidtaxrelief.org.
All right, so I want to get into this George Santos thing.
Listen, I don't think anybody's denying the fact that George Santos has been caught in lies.
He's admitted it.
I think he is a liar.
I'm not going to defend it.
But what do you want us to do?
We got a slim majority in the House.
It's a tricky situation.
But what I want to call out is the fact that six years to investigate Hunter Biden, and we got zilch so far.
We are having to beg, plead, investigate, subpoena, just to get an inch in that case with Hunter Biden because we're being stonewalled by the Department of Justice.
Meanwhile, George Santos is like 100, what, four months?
Four months.
And George Santos gets, is now in custody in New York, facing 20 years.
And the allegations against him are just phenomenal.
I mean, this stuff is just, I mean, listen, let me set the stage.
Play cut 91.
We'll lay out the charges against him.
George Santos is in custody, and this indictment has been unsealed.
I want to give you some quick details as we're going through the paperwork.
He is charged on a 13-count indictment according to those court documents.
The charges include seven counts of wire fraud, three counts of money laundering, one count of theft of public funds, and two counts of making materially false statements to the House of Representatives.
Okay.
So, no clearer example of this two-tiered system of justice that we have in America than this case right here.
You don't have to like George Santos.
You don't have to defend his lying.
We're not going to do that here.
But they, four months, and the guy's facing 20 years.
Meanwhile, Ilhan Omar, credible allegations would suggest, married her brother.
She's been accused of multiple campaign finance violations, lying up to Wazoo.
And guess what?
She's still serving happily away in Minnesota.
In the House of Representatives, Ilhan the Ingrate.
Saved by America, hates America.
It doesn't matter.
We don't do anything about it.
George Santos is facing 20 years for lying.
George Santos Versus Ilhan Omar 00:03:22
Okay, let's talk about it.
So there are 13 total charges: seven counts of wire fraud, three counts of money laundering, one count of theft of public funds, two counts of making material false statements, which is the left's favorite catch-all, by the way.
So the first is Santos allegedly solicited donations for political nonprofit, then use the donated funds for his personal expenses.
Two of these counts are for receiving illicit unemployment benefits of $564.
$564.
You can literally go into a CVS in California, rob it of just under $1,000 of goods, walk out, wave goodbye to the store staff, and nobody cares.
Meanwhile, because he's got an R next to his name and because he's a powerful person, one of our members of Congress, and he represents part of the very slim majority that we are hanging on to in the House, well, guess what?
He's facing 20 years.
If you don't think the whole system is full of it, this right here will tell you everything you need to know.
And they can sit on their moral high horse and say he's a confirmed liar, whatever.
Show me how many.
You think Eric Swalwell slept with a spy from China, Feng Feng.
He's still sitting there.
He still goes on MSNBC like he's some respectable member of Congress.
You got to be kidding me.
Rashida Tlaib has called for the extermination, essentially, of Israel.
She was trying to do it again yesterday.
Thankfully, McCarthy blocked her ability from holding that press conference or whatever it was, the rally.
So so far, oh, that's the other thing.
He exaggerated his income.
He didn't say he made less to avoid taxes or something.
He bragged about.
This guy's a piece of work.
I will tell you, he's a piece of work.
So far, McCarthy has not called for Santos to resign.
So just from a political standpoint, I've said it already.
I'm being transparent.
That makes perfect sense.
If the Democrats were in the similar position, if we actually grew a spine and held some of these liars on the other side accountable, guess what?
They would hold the line.
You can remove a sitting member of Congress by an up or down vote.
There's no burden of proof necessary, just so we're clear.
So the Democrats are begging McCarthy to call for that removal of Santos, and he has not done it.
It's just unbelievable.
I mean, you know, you literally have to find a dead body in the freezer of a Democrat in order to get him out of Congress.
Meanwhile, he lies about 564 bucks and he's facing 20 years.
Thanks so much for listening, everybody.
If you find what we do here helpful, enjoyable, interesting, educational, useful in any way, I encourage you, please support the show.
Go to charliekirk.com/slash support.
Pitch in.
Offer to support the show.
You make us bulletproof when boycotts happen, when advertisers say they don't like what we said, and then they bail on us.
All of that stuff just rolls right off our back when you support what we do here on the Charlie Kirk Show.
So it means the world to us.
Go to charliekirk.com forward slash support and become a part of our team.
We really appreciate it.
Thanks so much.
Talk to you soon.
For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to CharlieKirk.com.
Export Selection