All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Feb. 9, 2023 - The Charlie Kirk Show
34:08
America's New Anti-White Religion with Jeremy Carl and Alex Marlow
Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Anti-White Discrimination in Judiciary 00:09:13
Hey, everybody.
Today at the Charlie Kirk Show, Alex Marlow joins us to talk about the State of the Union and 2024.
Also, Jeremy Carl talks about the war on white people unfolding in America.
As always, you can email me your thoughts as always, freedom at charliekirk.com and subscribe to the Charlie Kirk Show podcast.
Get involved with Turning PointUSA today at tpusa.com.
That is tpusa.com.
Start a high school chapter, college chapter, tpusa.com.
Buckle up, everybody, here.
We go.
Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
I want to thank Charlie.
He's an incredible guy.
His spirit, his love of this country.
He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA.
We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
That's why we are here.
Brought to you by Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage.
For personalized loan services, you can count on.
Go to andrewandtodd.com, the wonderfulandrewandodd.com.
One of the great successes of the Trump presidency that I don't think he got enough credit for, President Trump, was what he was able to do with the federal bench.
One of the reasons why I support Donald Trump in 2024 is because of how clear and courageous he was in putting constitutionalist judges on both the Supreme Court and on the federal bench.
It's a little nerdy and wonky.
Not everybody enjoys hearing about it, but these are people with enormous amounts of power to interpret the Constitution of whether or not your liberties and freedoms deserve to be protected or taken away.
Someone's been really tracking, someone's been tracking this in a really interesting way.
I met him a year and a half ago at the Claremont Institute deal.
The Lincoln Fellowship was tons of fun.
I'm actually in the middle of another Claremont class right now, which is very challenging and worthwhile.
And he's done some fabulous research on this, and I look forward to discussing it with him.
Jeremy Carl is with us.
Jeremy, welcome to the program.
Thank you much, Charlie.
Pleasure to be on.
So, Jeremy, walk us through your tweet and explain it to us where you say, quote, anti-white discrimination in the Biden administration is universal, not just in the judiciary.
What do you mean by that?
Well, I mean, I think if you look throughout the administration, not just in the judiciary, you see just kind of blatant, not just like a thumb on the scale type affirmative action, but a huge load of bricks where being dumped on the scale where race and gender and, you know, whether you're transgender or whatever other alphabet soup you can hit is more relevant than your actual qualifications to do the job.
And at one level, as a conservative, I'm kind of happy about that because it makes them less competent.
On the other hand, as somebody who would like the government to run well and for people to be judged on merit, it's a very bad thing.
Right.
And so you say here, can you just walk us through or explain to us some of these numbers?
You say out of 97 federal judges, five are white men, 22 are black women.
That's right.
And, you know, it's really kind of a startling disparity when you consider about half of the attorneys in America.
Let's leave the quality issue aside for the moment are white men and about 2%, a little bit less actually, are African-American women.
And yet you have a situation where out of 97 federal judges, Biden has selected 22 of them.
And of course, including one on the Supreme Court, who he promised based on her race and gender, are African-American women, and just five are white men.
And you can't even use, I mean, obviously on the merits, it becomes absurd, but you can't even use a sort of representative argument argument or it's a political coalition because about 27% of Biden's voters were white men, but only 5% of the judges he's selecting are white men.
Similarly, only about a little less than 5% of lawyers are African-American, and we already have a federal judiciary that is about two and a half times that in terms of its African-American representativeness.
So, even if we want to cast aside issues of quality and fidelity to the Constitution, which I would never ever suggest we do, these just can't be justified even on their own merits of kind of gross coalition politics.
It can only be explained by sort of very overt discrimination.
So, here's an example of what happens when you allow the post-Civil Rights Act affirmative action anti-racism regime to become policy.
And so, Senator Kennedy from Louisiana, who's a very charming and whimsical man, decided to ask one of the more simple questions ever asked in a judicial confirmation hearing.
This should have been rather simple.
It should have been just kind of like status your name, your date of birth, you know, where you went on vacation.
This is not tough stuff, right?
This is not explain Marbury versus Madison, which also shouldn't be very tough, but you know, it's very simple, right?
It's first-year law school stuff.
It's not even that, actually, it's seventh-grade civics stuff, if it's properly taught.
And so, this woman by the name of Charnel Bajelkirgin, which is a real word salad of a Scandinavian name, I believe is a diversity pick.
I don't know what her race is, it doesn't matter to me, but she does look like a quote-unquote person of color, which you have to assume that's why she was selected.
I don't know her race, race really means nothing to me, but it certainly means a lot to Joe Biden.
So, listen to this dialogue between Senator Kennedy and Charnel Bajelkirjin about: hey, what is the second article of the Constitution, the fifth article of the U.S. Constitution?
Shocking.
Play Cut 86.
Judge on the far end.
Tell me what Article 5 of the Constitution does.
Article 5 is not coming to mind at the moment.
Okay.
How about Article 2?
Neither is Article 2.
Do you know what purposivism is?
In my 12 years as an assistant attorney general and my nine years serving as a judge, I was not faced with that precise question.
Jeremy, I mean, I don't get shocked easily anymore.
We live in the era of drag queens and child pornography in our schools.
This shocked me.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, it didn't shock me, unfortunately, but I think it was.
You're far more cynical than I am.
It was great that Senator Kennedy was able to expose that in a sort of very folksy, folksy way.
But I mean, this is, you know, the problem, the reason why this matters so much is that these are not four-year appointments.
This is not four years we're going to suffer through this.
This is 40 years that we may suffer through this with these judges.
And so even though I think, and I said this in my Twitter thread, which is at Jeremy Carl4, you can look at it there.
Even though we may get rid of these, you know, the Biden administration, and I hope we do in 2024, even though I think the Supreme Court is also likely to strike down affirmative action this term, we are going to have an affirmative action Supreme Court with all of the bad things that flow from that for decades now.
And that's the problem with this sort of picking.
Was Charnel Bajelkerjan, was she confirmed or has her vote been scheduled yet?
It has not been scheduled yet.
There is still some pushback.
And I think it would be interesting.
I mean, what happened there was so embarrassing that it wouldn't surprise me if she went down.
There's another judge that they have, or somebody they're trying to get put forth onto the judiciary.
I also tweeted about who is formerly basically the legal director of the SPLC.
So I mean, just a really radical activist and somebody who the Republicans already all voted against in committee.
But even some Quinn Hilliard, who's a very sort of moderate guy in national review, said basically, if you're an at-all moderate senator, you couldn't possibly vote for this candidate.
And it will be interesting to see whether folks like my Democratic senator, John Tester, or folks like Joe Manchin can stomach pretending that these people are moderate or qualified and voting for them.
Especially with John Tester in cycle in a presidential year, which he tends to not like those presidential year turnouts.
No, no, I'm confident we're going to get rid of him.
That's good.
I'd love to talk to you about that because Tester is a sneaky guy.
He works that state, and there's a lot of suspicious votes that come out of Indian reservations in the eastern part of the state.
Magically, all for John Tester, obviously.
So I want to ask you, Jeremy, just quickly, and we'll talk about this after the break.
You do, the main thrust of your piece is a little less about the judiciary and kind of more about anti-white discrimination, which I do want to talk to you about.
Guilt and Group Expropriation 00:06:19
You're not allowed to say that.
Where does that come from?
Where does it come from that you're not allowed to say that?
No, Where does anti-white?
I mean, I know you're not allowed to say that.
That's obvious.
Where does the anti-whiteness come from?
What is the driving force behind that?
Well, I think it's just deeply embedded in Democratic coalition politics right now.
I mean, it's just everything is about kind of blaming every bad thing that's happened in America on white people.
And I think, you know, some of this can be told as a story of sort of trying to rewrite history where you and the folks, your parents and grandparents are the stars, or some of it can be jealousy or anger, or just frankly, the politics of expropriation.
But I think that it's really coming from there.
And it's very dangerous because ultimately, if we can't develop a kind of unified American ethnicity, for lack of a better term, we are going to go the way of very many other multi-ethnic empires that kind of dissolved in fractiousness and violence.
And I think it's a real danger with some of the rhetoric coming out of the left right now.
And Jeremy's Twitter is Jeremy Carl4.
It's worth a follow.
Rents are soaring at unprecedented highs.
If you're renting or have a friend or family member, that is, now is a great time to make the move to homeownership.
Look, you got to own renting, that's great reset stuff.
Andrew Del Rey and Todd Avakian at Sierra Pacific Mortgage have helped so many people make that leap from renting to owning with lots of programs that offer first-time buyers assistance with little to no down payment needed.
I encourage you right now to visit my buddies, their website.
They're great guys.
They're Christians.
They're conservatives.
They love the Lord.
AndrewandTodd.com right now.
The thing I love about these guys is it's not about the transaction.
They're helping you create a plan to help you reach your goals.
Give them a call or go to their website, AndrewandTodd.com.
With today's still historically low interest rates, it's easier than you think to become a homeowner.
I've relied on them and producer Andrew has as well.
I highly recommend you take action now.
And if you know someone paying rent, tell them about Andrew and Todd.
Go to andrewandodd.com and tell them the Charlie Kirk Show sent you.
Jeremy, one of the most disturbing phenomena in America is white guilt.
Where does it come from?
Well, I think, you know, we've had the left controlling the narrative for, you know, decades now, depending on, you know, whether you want to go back to the 1960s, 1930s, even early 20th century.
And they've sort of told this story about how America is a bad place.
Well, guess what America was, you know, just demographically until the Hard Seller Immigration Act of 1965.
It was essentially all African-American and white, and about 90% of it was white.
So, you know, if the country is a bad country, well, we know who we have to blame for this.
But it's really just been ingrained in all of our elite cultural institutions.
It's out there in Hollywood.
It's in the books we read.
And even out here in Montana, it's sometimes a little bit hard to just get away from that narrative relentlessly beating on you.
Yeah, I just, but the idea of the guilt is what's so interesting, though, is that you have to somehow apologize for your skin color.
I'm not even saying that your skin color should be something you're proud of.
I'm not even making that contention.
I think it's indifferent to it.
I think it's irrelevant.
But the guilt is a complete, it's that, that's not indifferent or neutrality.
That is, I have to pay penance.
I have to apologize.
I mean, and I mean, Jeremy, it feels as if the kind of new religion is the religion of anti-racism, where I have to tithe, I have to give public proclamations.
My original sin is my melanin content.
The only difference is that there's no salvation.
No, and that you've hit it exactly, right?
It's original sin without salvation.
I mean, it's really a Christian heresy, ultimately.
And it has to go kind of go back with, I think that the word tithe is also really important here because it kind of gets into what some of this agenda is.
And I'm actually writing a book right now for regnary on anti-white racism that should be out sometime next year.
I love that.
So I'm kind of deeply kind of ingrained thinking about these sorts of issues right now.
But when you look at the language of reparations and San Francisco, for example, saying, you know, we're going to pay $5 million plus all this other stuff to each African-American resident of the city, basically, which sounds crazy.
I mean, is not going to be doable under any circumstances, but they're going to come up with something that's only a tenth as crazy that will still be completely crazy that we'll do.
And a lot of this is just about dollars and cents.
It's about, you know, one group trying to expropriate another group.
And when you encourage these sorts of racial divisions in society, this is the sort of logic of conflict that you get.
Yeah.
And it's all being pushed by white people, which is what's so interesting to me.
And it secular white people, by the way.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, Daniel Horowitz, who's at the Manhattan Institute, has done some fascinating research on just how freaky and bizarre, basically, although he doesn't use that language because he's a good academic, liberal white people are in terms of having what's called an out-group preference.
Like every group just naturally kind of prefers their own group over other groups on average, you know, to a sort of normal extent.
And obviously it can become too much where it really becomes ethnic chauvinism, except for liberal whites.
And liberal whites actually prefer substantially non-whites.
I mean, it's a very bizarre thing.
African Americans don't have that.
Asian Americans don't have that.
Hispanics don't have it.
Conservative whites don't have it, or even moderate whites.
But it's just the question, right?
Is there ever a breaking point to that, right?
Where it's, you know, I really love BLM until my Beverly Hills street is ransacked, right?
I mean, it's, I wonder if I have not seen the breaking point, actually.
I've seen that.
Why Investors Need Gold Now 00:02:40
Yeah, go ahead.
Yeah, we keep, we keep waiting for it, right?
And I think you're probably sitting there like me going, my goodness, at some point this insanity has to stop.
I do think, and this is one of the reasons I initially explored the judge issue, is that there are these elite, quote unquote, white guys out there who are looking at this and realizing that they're not going to be considered on their merits for anything meaningful in this new anti-white regime.
And I think at some point for some of them, this will be a breaking point because we sort of have this bizarre situation where if you're a white plumber, you're not necessarily facing a ton of discrimination from the regime, but those guys have moved very, very far to the right.
Whereas if you're a white lawyer where you're receiving quite a lot of discrimination from the regime in very overt ways, you still haven't made that move.
And over time, I think that is not going to be sustainable.
And so they're going to always, this is my prediction.
They're going to look for exemptions for white liberals, not by finding some sort of great grandmother from Argentina.
No, no, no, no.
Exemptions of how much do you do for the environment?
How much do you do for allies?
So certain white liberals will be excluded from the judgment.
They will then be allowed to be allies if you do the appropriate funding or actions towards the anti-racist regime.
Otherwise, you're a waste of time.
We hate you.
Jeremy, really important.
Can't wait to read your book.
Thank you for talking about this.
Absolutely.
Thanks for having me on, Charlie.
Talk to you soon.
Thank you.
Yep.
Did you know that gold was the best performing asset in 2022?
Through all record-breaking inflation rates, crashing markets, and crypto scams, there is one asset that held its own.
It is gold.
Noble Gold Investments helps thousands of clients buy real physical gold last year.
According to the longtermtrends.net, gold outperformed the SP 500, Dow, and Bitcoin in 2022.
Had you invested in the SP 500 a year ago, you would be down more than 20%.
If you invested in Bitcoin a year ago, you'd be down more than 65%.
If you invested in Dow a year ago, you'd be down almost 10%.
Yes, gold has outperformed all of them in 2022, and silver was not far behind.
So what are you waiting for?
Join the thousands of others by opening a gold IRA or silver IRA with Noble Gold Investments.
You need assets you can touch.
Invest with Noble Gold Investments before the end of this month.
You'll bag a free fourth of an ounce American Eagle Gold Eagle Coin with every qualified IRA of $50,000 or more.
You can't go wrong with Noble Gold Investments and there are thousands of five-star reviews.
So check it out right now, Noble Gold Investments.
Biden's Stealth Radicalization 00:15:54
Joining us now from Breitbart.com is Alex Marlow.
Alex, welcome to the program.
Charlie, it's great to be on with you.
You know, I reached out to you in a different circumstance and then I end up on your show.
This happens every time.
So I've got to constantly need favors from you.
There you go.
I always end up on your national broadcast.
It's great.
Well, we got to fill time.
So, I mean, we're helping each other.
I can do that.
That's something I have.
Yes, you do.
You also host a radio show at an ungodly hour.
It's you and Hugh Hewitt.
I just, I don't know how you got three o'clock LA time.
I just, that's when you start, right?
You start at 3 a.m.
Yeah, I think it's part of our, if you go back to the early Homo sapiens, I think this is where it comes from.
I think I feel like I'm part of the food chain again, where I think a lion is going to attack me if I sleep too long.
So I've always been a terrible sleeper anyway.
So when the national radio show came up in the middle of the night, I was like, okay, I'll do it.
It sounds fine.
I'm up anyway.
So that's not.
Nope.
I really don't think I could do it.
I don't.
So, Alex, there's so many different topics and stories out there.
I mean, you hosted a whole show today.
What's on your mind?
Tell us some interesting things you're seeing and we'll talk about it.
Save the Union.
We could also talk, Charlie, of course, about what's going on with you and the continued war on free speech, which you covered at Breitbart with you and my friend Dennis Krager.
Yes.
Just surreal.
This is still, I'm getting a little nervous for the country because I thought we might be pushing past the peak of cancel culture.
We might be pushing past the point where it's just getting so cringy and called normative people.
Dennis Prager is one of the kindest men.
He is dedicated to deep thought.
You know, I'm listening to you during the break with some of your best up clips that your guests hear, and you're talking, we're recommending people take their significant other to church and how you'll grow in faith by going with your family and your girlfriends, your boyfriends at church.
It's such lovely messages.
And then you guys are smeared as the worst people on the planet.
So, you know, it can't help having gone through what I've gone through at Breitbart News being one of the first outlets that was truly canceled.
That's correct.
And simply for airing normative, conservative viewpoints.
Normative, conservative viewpoints are good enough to get you thrown off of campus, to get you protested, to get you blacklisted.
And I thought we were past this, but we're not.
And that is why we need to continue to support organizations you care about.
It's not enough simply to passively give Charlie, you know, a wink and a nod or to give me a Breitbart a wink and a nod.
We have to be vocal and we have to also be kind and cool with people, but we have to be vocal that it's not okay to shut down free speech on campus.
Well, what's extraordinary about this particular story?
I mean, I get protested all the time, is that this is not being led by students.
The students kind of are bored.
They're like, okay, yeah, whatever.
Where's the weed or whatever?
This is professors that it's being led by 37 out of 47 professors are leading this.
I mean, so this is a top-down revolution more than it's a bottom-up.
Yeah, and that is not, I think, uncommon because I think the people who are in our professoriate now are people who have become accustomed to this and they're so bubbled, which is a famous point.
I mean, I don't, I'm not the first to make it.
But the fact that they are so bubbled and the fact that they don't know any conservatives, they don't interact with them on a regular basis.
They don't understand that you simply have your audience's best interest at heart.
They think that you really are who the media says you are.
They don't understand that the media is fake news.
They don't understand that it's agenda-driven, that American press is becoming some of the worst press on the planet.
And because of that, I think that they feel like this is not just a viewpoint that is true, but that they think they'll actually score accolades in their community.
And that's what we need to disincentivize.
And you can only do it by cutting off your school if you don't.
I totally agree.
Yeah, I mean, and so that these people are what my favorite part of the whole thing, and you'll get a kick out of this house because you know Dennis is that the name of the talk is Health, Wealth, and Happiness.
And Dennis is the happiness guy.
I mean, he does a whole hour on it.
He wrote a fabulous book on it.
Happiness is a serious problem.
So if you want to talk about it, he's pretty well qualified.
I don't know why they're having me for happiness.
That's a separate issue.
But my favorite part is the most vocal person that is coming out against Dennis Prager and our visit is a religious studies scholar.
And I mean, this guy, if you were to say, okay, I'm a religious studies scholar and I'm going to go on the record that Dennis Prager does not belong at my university.
Just a little bit of a lack of self-awareness.
I mean, Prager is, I say this, I don't think anybody alive, alive, has written about, talked about, or published more on the first five books of the Bible than Dennis Prager.
Maybe the religious studies scholar at Arizona State University could learn something from him.
His rational Bible books, they're so important.
I'm going to review them probably for the rest of my life.
They're amazing.
They're so rich and deep.
And oh my goodness.
And I think that's how Dennis intended it.
And that's how he's dedicated his portion of his life.
And the thought that that would be some sort of hatred is it's absurd, but the point is simply to make it so it's too much of a hassle for people like you and me and Dennis to do what we want to do with our lives, which is try to inform people about values and politics and faith and the things that can help them achieve health, wealth, and happiness.
They just want to make it so that our lives are difficult.
There's not a pure bone in their body.
And this is why it's such a true outrage that you can't talk about enough.
Yep, I agree.
So shifting gears here, State of the Union, what was your big takeaway, Alex?
Despite the slurs and all that, I tweeted and I said, I think one of Biden's superpowers is that he's hard for most people to hate, easy to try to elicit sympathy, but there's almost like this stealth mode that he's able to be incredibly radical while the veneer is kind of a deranged foreign agent.
What's your thoughts?
Yeah, I think that Biden has done something very clever.
I think he, at least at one point, had a real fastball.
And I think that what he's done is he has leaned into this, this persona where he's this bumbling, stuttering guy.
You probably saw the New York Times big story about his stutter and how he's going to overcome his stutter to give this speech.
He gives this sort of sympathetic narrative to him.
And I think in actuality, he really is the person in American politics who understands how to move the levers of power most efficiently and most effectively, which is not saying much because our political class is not overly impressive these days.
But beware of people who just pawn him off as some sort of a dummy and some sort of demented person.
Now, I'm sure he is having some level of dementia.
I'm not dismissing that, but I think that he has really lowered the bar for himself to such a low level that you see that the approval rating of the speech was pretty high.
Charlie, it was an objectively terrible speech.
He demonized, he lied, he failed to unify, that he called for unity.
He didn't come up with one bipartisan issue.
It was one of these things where you call for unity, but just so long as you agree with Joe Biden on everything.
But the thing that struck me the most about the speech were the own goals.
Charlie, which politician in this country has spent the most time in Washington of any politician, maybe of all time?
It's got to be the guy that's in the White House.
Yeah.
Right.
So if the tax code is ruined, if our infrastructure is going in the wrong direction, if we are, if the Fenton Hill is streaming over our borders and killing people, then whose fault is this?
Of course, it's Joe Biden's fault more than any other person.
Now, there's sheer blame, but I found it absolutely surreal to watch him claim all these grievances with the government that he's been responsible for more than any other person.
Yeah.
And so secondly, did you see, and again, it's Joe Biden is nothing more than just chat GPT as a president, right?
They just input whatever the AI is just what it is.
So, I mean, it's not him, right?
It's the Leviathan behind him.
However, it is an interesting time.
It's a high-stakes speech.
They obviously had a lot of people involved.
Every word was poll tested.
It was run through, you know, vast algorithmic analysis.
I saw a little bit of a hand tilt that there was at least we're going to do a little bit of the populist nationalist theatrical performance that, and that frustrates, obviously should frustrate you.
It's all lies and it's nonsense and it's deceit.
But is the populist vote one that Democrats are going to try to chip away at in 2024?
I think with rhetoric, but if you follow Biden, Biden's rhetoric has never exactly matched his policies.
His policies, his rhetoric tends to match the whatever is what he thinks will curry the most favor with the media.
And then the policies is whatever he thinks would curry most favor with the voters.
And I gave a lot of examples of this.
Foreign policy is a key one where he talks very tough on Putin.
And over the years, he's been very weak on Russia.
And I could do a whole dissertation on that topic.
He talks very tough on China.
I think it's pretty famous what Joe Biden's actual China policy is.
So this is kind of how he's always operated.
So, yeah, it is noteworthy that he was lying about Republicans wanting to repeal Medicare and Social Security.
I think that for really casual political observers, that could be a good political talking point.
We know Republicans are not talking about that at all.
We not to say they shouldn't be.
I'm not judging that.
I'm just saying, Charlie, you interact with as many conservatives as anyone.
So do I.
It's not a topic.
We never talk about it.
It's not discussed.
It hasn't been discussed in years.
And it's one of these things where Biden was smearing people about it.
It was good that the Republicans, by the way, were started oohing and aweing and kind of cutting in there.
It's all theatrics anyway.
So to have those sort of smears.
But there's some moments where I don't think that I don't think that tactic works.
You saw, Charlie, that he was blaming.
Yeah, he blaming January the 6th for the Paul Pelosi attack, claiming victory over China with the spy balloon having just passed through our country.
All of that is just ridiculous to any paying attention audience.
Hey, everybody, Charlie Kirk here.
I simply cannot say enough good things about Strong Cell.
I personally take it every day and it has changed my life.
More energy, more focus.
And overall, I just feel better.
Strong Cell has NADH.
You should Google it.
It's a real thing.
I've studied it for years and it makes a huge difference.
It also has marine collagen that supports your body's health at the cellular level.
Visit strongsell.com forward slash Charlie to learn more.
Use special discount code Charlie at checkout to receive 20% off for Kirk listeners.
That is strongcell.com forward slash Charlie.
Use promo code Charlie.
Alex, we played this tape earlier.
It's a long tape, so I won't play it because our time is valuable together.
But Joy Reed said that the culture war is over and the left has won the culture war.
Breitbart has been one of the few people that first wanted to fight the culture war and then said the importance of the culture war.
So I can't think of a better guest to just kind of get your analysis of where do we stand.
Your thoughts on Joy Reed saying the left has now won the culture war.
I mean, she's not speaking from any point of authority on this, and she's a provocateur more than anyone maybe on cable news.
So I don't take her opinion from coming from her, she's got an authority on this matter.
But if you think about it, there is a narrative that would support her point.
And the thing that disturbs me the most is what's happened with our corporations.
We know famously that the media and that the entertainment industry has been co-opted by the left as well as our academic institutions.
Charlie, you and I know all of that pretty well.
I'm not thrilled with how the right has done responding to the entertainment media.
We just have not created enough stuff.
I know some of our and I know some of our friends are trying.
The aforementioned Dennis Prager, I know, is trying.
Daily Wire is trying.
God bless him.
They're doing it.
Daily Wire's trying.
Yeah, sure.
And but it's not enough at this point.
So many years after Andrew warned us.
But what does make me think maybe she's right is the corporate stuff, which has really become my obsession over the past few years, starting with big tech and realizing it's so many.
I mean, just look at what Disney's doing now with their with which is entertainment too, but it's just a mega conglomerate with their proud family stuff trying to cancel Lincoln.
They're canceling Lincoln now, Charlie.
If they moved on to canceling Lincoln, if they feel like everyone else has been canceled, name me one person who would cancel Lincoln.
Name me one.
Well, I'll tell you, it's Disney.
Disney's trying to do it.
And it does make you think maybe she's right.
And that's sad to me.
And I'm not going to stop fighting personally.
I know you won't either.
But it makes you think maybe we need to change some tactics here.
And I think there's a question of winning versus one.
And so I think they're definitely winning, but to say that the battle is won, I think, is not correct.
In fact, I hope she thinks that it will make them less aggressive, more lazy, more slothful, and more likely to fight within themselves.
Final thought, final question on this, Alex.
We have about three minutes remaining.
When I saw Joe Biden meander into the State of the Union, it kind of hit me.
I said, wow, the masters of the Democrat Party, it's obviously not him.
He's just doing what they tell him to do.
They are very confident, though, in the machinery and their ability to plug almost anything in.
I say this.
I say if Republicans are not serious about creating a ballot chasing operation, voter registration, ballot curing, data operation, which I do not have faith or confidence in the current RNC regime to do, they could run John Fetterman for the presidency and get him in there.
That's not a joke they could do it.
Your thoughts, Alex?
Correct.
I said the exact same thing when Katie Tur floated John Fetterman as a presidential candidate, right after he won his senate seat.
100% he's presidential candidate.
Who isn't?
It's the, they're all interchangeable.
I'm personally interested in Joe Biden for some perverted reason.
I don't understand why, but I am.
But I'm not overly interested in Kamala Harris.
It's just one of these things where just some people are just more interesting news-wise than others.
But the exact opposite.
I've never been less interested in a human being than Joe Biden.
It's just so interesting.
Yeah, keep going.
Well, I find it fascinating.
I think for some of the stuff you're saying is that he is so unbelievably unimpressive and yet has somehow gotten himself more power than arguably any American president of the last hundred years and maybe any American over the last 100 plus years, just insane levels, at least back to World War II, which is just unbelievable that that's the case.
And considering how unimpressive he is, but it proves your point.
Your point is they're all interchangeable, almost all of them.
Pete Butta Jedge, Kamala Harris, Gavin Newsom, Joe Biden.
There's a dime's worth of difference in how they would govern.
And that's something that really needs to wake people up is we need to not think about the individual as much as we need to think about the process.
Now, the individuals are interesting.
They're characters for us who cover the news, but it is the process that they have nailed.
And we do not have it nailed on the right.
I think that's right.
And they're better at the game, which is to put the pieces of paper in the ballot boxes in a truncated piece of time.
They know it, and so they could run anybody for it.
Any announcements, things you want to talk about, Alex?
Things you're working on, books, projects, 30%?
No, yeah, not really.
I actually do some big stuff that is in the works that I would love to come back and talk about when it's ready to go.
But in the meantime, Breitbart.com is a place to go and always happy for all the support and all the sharing our content.
All the social web is really great.
I go to Breitbart.com every day.
Alex, God bless you, man.
Talk to you soon.
Thank you.
Thanks so much for listening, everybody.
Email me your thoughts as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.
Thank you so much for listening.
God bless.
For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to CharlieKirk. com.
Export Selection