All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
March 21, 2022 - The Charlie Kirk Show
35:06
Ketanji Brown-Jackson: Exposing the Disturbing Truth of Her Judicial Record
Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Support Turning Point USA 00:02:00
Hey everybody, a comprehensive overview of Katanji Brown Jackson, who is looking to go on the United States Supreme Court.
We dive into her views, her history.
Who is she?
What does she believe?
Very informative episode on this particular topic.
Text it to your friends if they are posting in support of Katanji Brown Jackson.
You guys can email us your thoughts.
It's always freedom at charliekirk.com.
If you want to support the Charlie Kirk show, go to charliekirk.com/slash support and get involved with Turning PointUSA today at tpusa.com.
At Turning Point USA, you can start a high school or college chapter today at tpusa.com.
You could also come to our Young Women's Leadership Summit in Dallas, Texas, June 2nd through the 4th at tpusa.com slash YWLS.
You could come to our tour where we're going from Arkansas to Auburn to Milwaukee to Boulder to Berkeley to Fullerton, tpusa.com/slash tour.
If you want to support the Charlie Kirk show, go to charliekirk.com/slash support.
That's charliekirk.com/slash support.
Buckle up, everybody.
Here we go.
Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
I want to thank Charlie.
He's an incredible guy.
His spirit, his love of this country.
He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA.
We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
That's why we are here.
Brought to you by Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage.
For personalized loan services, you can count on.
Go to andrewandodd.com, the wonderfulandrewandtodd.com.
So there's plenty of Ukraine and Russia news.
We're going to put that aside for a second.
A lot of that is actually probably overcovered right now.
And there's some very important domestic news that we have to get to.
The Supreme Court Nominee Debate 00:08:02
Article 3 of the United States Constitution states very clearly that the judicial branch of government must have its own independent and equal authority.
Article 3 is very important.
Article 3 at times gets glossed over because the executive branch and the legislative branch get all of the coverage.
The digital branch of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and such inferior courts as Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.
So it's important to know that circuit courts actually are not in the Constitution.
They were created by Congress.
The judges, both of the Supreme and Inferior Courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior and shall at stated times receive for their services a compensation which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.
Article 3 starts this idea of the independent judiciary.
So the idea of having the legislative and the executive separate was profound for the founding fathers to put into writing in the structure of the government.
But then to have an independent judiciary that could be a check on the other two branches of government, that really cemented the moral principle that not one individual, not one party, not one idea, not one message, not one movement should have monopoly control over your civilization.
Well, right now, as Vladimir Putin continues his reckless and immoral invasion of Ukraine, very quietly, there is a Senate confirmation fight looming over the upcoming Supreme Court justice vacancy filled by Justice Breyer.
Katanji Brown Jackson is up for the nomination to become a Supreme Court justice.
Katanji Brown Jackson is an individual who has not received, I think, adequate press coverage.
So that's what we're going to do today.
We're going to make sure you know and your Republican senators know via you and your Republican representatives know, even though the House of Representatives has very little say in Supreme Court fights, exactly who is this individual?
Who is this person who has kind of operated in the shadows of the media, largely because of the war in Ukraine?
Who is Katanji Brown Jackson?
Well, first of all, let's talk about how Katanji Brown Jackson was selected.
Well, Katanji Brown Jackson was selected not because of her wisdom or because of her interpretation of prior cases or because of her firm rulings or because of her belief in the Constitution.
She was selected for irrelevant criteria.
Joe Biden said it very similarly.
He said, I made a pledge to select a black female to go to the United States Supreme Court.
Why does that matter exactly?
Why does melanin content matter to your constitutional interpretation?
Where in this beautiful document that I'm holding, published by Turning Point USA, the United States Constitution, where does skin color matter at all in the promise of the Constitution or in the promise of the Declaration that, of course, preceded it?
We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty due to ourselves and our posterity, ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Where does skin color matter at all there?
Katanji Brown Jackson has a very disturbing history.
Very few people know much about her at all.
In fact, some people are saying that I only know her because of her qualification of being a black female.
I think it's an insult to just select people based on their immutable characteristics.
We should select people because they're the best person for the job.
It's an insult to her as well, by the way.
It's an insult to this individual, Katanji Brown Jackson, if she was actually a phenomenal judge, which we'll get into.
So let's get into some of the background of Katanji Brown Jackson.
Jackson worked as a lawyer for several terrorists detained at Guantamano Bay, Gitmo, including a Taliban intelligence officer who is likely a leader of a terrorist cell.
Jackson was a public defender, so you can't blame her for representing terrorists.
Everyone needs and deserves representation.
But Jackson's advocacy for these terrorists was zealous and going beyond just giving them a competent defense.
Despite Jackson's claim that she did not get to choose her clients as a public defender, she continued to advocate for these gitmo terrorists when she went into private practice.
Jackson is a Democrat partisan.
She worked for the Obama presidential campaign and as a poll monitor and donated to Obama.
Jackson is a registered Democrat and her husband donated $1,600 to the Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign.
Since her appointment to the D.C. Circuit last June, Judge Katanji Brown Jackson has yet to publish a single opinion.
Here's some other things that she's best known for.
She blocked President Trump's executive orders to hold failing federal employees accountable, a decision that the D.C. Circuit unanimously reversed.
Jackson blocked the Trump administration from expanding its expedited removal program to deport illegals faster, absurdly saying the DHS did not consider the impact on illegal immigrants.
And a left-wing immigration group applauded Katanji Jackson Brown for refusing to use the term alien or illegal.
I'm sorry, Katanji Brown Jackson.
I got my terms confused.
Her name confused, I should say.
But there's another very disturbing wrinkle and development in her history as a judge.
As far back as in law school, Judge Jackson, who by the way is now up for advise and consent in front of the United States Senate, has questioned making convicts register as sex offenders.
One of her crusades in life has been that we need to go out of our way to go protect sex offenders.
She has said that it has led to stigmatization and ostracization.
She suggested public policy is driven by, quote, a climate of fear, hatred, and revenge against sex offenders.
As a member of the U.S. Sentencing Commission, Judge Jackson advocated for dramatic changes in how the law treats sex offenders by eliminating the existing mandatory minimum sentences for child pornography.
In her time on the U.S. Sentencing Commission, Judge Jackson, quote, mistakenly assumed that child pornography offenders are pedophiles, quote, to understand this category of non-pedophiles who obtain child pornography.
Judge Jackson was given an opportunity to sentence someone who was a sex offender.
And even though the government was recommending 10 years of prison, Judge Jackson sentenced the perpetrator to only three months in prison, three months.
Why is she so soft and why does she have a soft spot for people that commit some of the most heinous, unspeakable crimes in our nation?
Magnesium Deficiency and Stress 00:02:20
Is the Republican Party going to ask about this?
Are the Senate Republicans going to ask Katanji Brown Jackson about these rulings and these opinions?
Well, right now, the U.S. Supreme Court, the future of the U.S. Supreme Court is being decided in the U.S. Senate.
Being an entrepreneur and running a business is not for the faint of heart.
I have two jobs.
I'd do the Charlie Kirk show till noon, then Turning Point USA till I go to sleep and all the problems in between.
A lot of stress.
330 days on the road I spent last year.
But if you're not careful, the stress can start to take a toll on your body, raising your blood pressure, making it harder to sleep, draining you of vital energy, and making you more irritable.
That's why I recommend you supplement with magnesium daily.
About 75% of people are magnesium deficient.
That number might be higher among business owners and C-level professionals.
That's because stress depletes magnesium levels.
This can trigger a various cycle of rising stress and severe magnesium deficiency.
This deficiency can lead to higher levels of anxiety, irritability, trouble sleeping, and low energy.
It can even contribute to foot and leg cramps while you sleep.
Now, you might be wondering, does magnesium really affect all these things?
Well, the answer is yes.
In fact, magnesium is involved in more than 300 chemical processes inside your body.
So a lot of different things can start to go wrong if you're deficient.
The good news is you can experience a number of positive health benefits just by getting enough magnesium, including better sleep, more energy, healthy blood pressure, less irritability, a calmer mood, stronger bones, reduced muscle cramping, and even a few migraines.
But to experience these health benefits, you have to get the right kinds of magnesium.
Truth is, most magnesium supplements you find in health stores use the only two cheapest synthetic forms.
They're not full spectrum.
There are actually seven unique forms of magnesium.
You must get all of them if you want to experience its calming stress-relieving effects.
That's why I recommend magnesium breakthrough from Buy Optimizers.
It's the only full organic, full-spectrum magnesium supplement that includes seven unique forms of magnesium for stress relief.
Better sleep all in one bottle.
Simply take two capsules before you go to bed, and you'll be amazed by the improvements in your mood and energy levels.
And how much more rested do you feel when you wake up?
For an exclusive offer for my listeners, go to magbreakthrough.com/slash Kirk and use Kirk10 during checkout to save 10% and get free shipping.
Right now, that's magbreakthrough.com/slash Kirk.
That's M-A-G-Breakthrough.com/slash Kirk.
Kirk10 for 10% off any order.
Democracy vs Political Theater 00:15:28
The United States Constitution is the greatest political document ever written.
Praise God that the founding fathers had the foresight, had the wisdom, had the time to study human nature and put together the Constitution as we know it.
It's an exceptional document.
One of the reasons why America is such a unique country is that we did not drift into existence.
It did not come into existence over a long period of time.
It was summoned into existence.
We demanded the country to exist.
And around the United States Constitution and the fights for ratification and the principles of the Declaration, which fit in each other perfectly, was this argument.
What should the structure of our government be?
And separation of powers and checks and balances are fundamental to that.
Now, when you start to look a level deeper into Katanji Brown Jackson, we start to realize that she has said some very positive things about people that don't believe the United States Constitution is exceptional, that don't believe that the founding was unique.
From Breitbart.com, Katangi Brown Jackson, who is President Biden's nominee for Supreme Court seat, vacated by Justice Breyer, cited critical race theory founder Derek Bell and the 1619 project as inspirations in 2020.
She talks about how the book, Faces at the Bottom of the Well, written by Professor Derek Bell, who also wrote an intro to critical race theory in the early 1990s.
Judge Jackson also cited the fraudulent 1619 project of Nicole Hanna-Jones and the New York Times, which won the Pulitzer Prize, despite falsely claiming that the United States fought the American Revolution to defend slavery in the South.
Judge Jackson closed her lecture at University of Michigan, citing what, quote, she said the favorite civil rights photographed of modern times was an image of a 2016 protest over the police shooting of Alton Sterling and Philando Castile.
So why is it so important that we pinpoint whether or not Katanji Brown Jackson views American history correctly?
Well, she's going to have a lot of power.
She's going to be one of nine to determine whether or not laws and actions, Congress and executive, is constitutional.
But if she views America as being sinful from the beginning, if she looks the American structure of the Constitution to be corroded, then how will her interpretations, how will her rulings ever be in harmony or consistent with what is proper and necessary for the American Republic?
Well, she doesn't believe we are a republic.
Based on the Article III project on a document that they published, quote, she says that in a democracy, safeguards are built in to protect human dignity.
The effect of sanction rather than the reason for imposing it must necessarily be that criteria.
Now, she's doing that while defending sex offenders, a pattern of her rulings, a pattern of her period of time on the bench as a judge on the sentencing commission.
She almost always favors the criminal.
Katanji Brown Jackson almost always yields in the direction of the perpetrator, never for the victim.
But we're not a democracy.
Why would we put someone on the U.S. Supreme Court that outwardly does not even know the type of government that we have?
We've gone through this many different times.
What's so interesting is that the BLM types, the people that support BLM Incorporated, like Nicole Hannah-Jones and Robin DiAngelo, and of course, now Katanji Brown Jackson, they say we're a democracy.
What's so interesting is if they actually cared about the rights of a minority, they should know that in a democracy, the rights of individuals can be easily voted away.
That's what makes a republic and a democracy fundamentally different, one of the things.
For example, in a pure democracy, if we were to put that into practice, you could just say, hey, we want to go take voting rights away from black people.
51% of people want that to happen, therefore let's get it done.
But in a republic, you are not allowed to use the power of the majority to terrorize or diminish or punish or silence the rights of the minority.
You're not allowed to do it.
The rights of the minority are protected.
The rights to speech, the rights to assembly, the right to arm yourself, the right to privacy, the right to run for office, the right for due process.
And yet here she says clearly that, well, we're a democracy.
Well, no, we're not.
We have some democratic systems within our constitutional government.
We have a democratic process of electing individuals, but we are far from a democracy.
Hey, everybody, look, we all need extra protection right now, especially.
We need natural immunity.
And if you've made the natural choice to strengthen your God-given immune response, I really respect that.
My good friends, Centurion Labs have combined five key ingredients to defend your immune system against colds, the flu, and even the coronavirus.
It's called Centurion Defender.
Centurion Labs, they're terrific.
They've dedicated the last 15 years to research to develop safe and affordable health care products made in America and you can trust.
So just for a limited time, you guys listening to my program can save 20% off your order of Defender.
So visit centurionlabs.com slash Kirk or use promo code Kirk.
Defend your health today with Centurion Defender.
And use promo code Kirk to get 25% of your first order of Centurion Defender.
God bless you guys.
Judges should not be radicals.
They should be tied to what the text intended.
They should be textualists.
They should be originalists.
It never used to be this way when we used to nominate judges to the U.S. Supreme Court and they used to think the founding of the country was potentially racist and saying good things about the author of critical race theory, Derek Bell.
We never used to have it this way.
But of course, the left, like all things, they can't help themselves but to destroy once beautiful and pristine institutions.
Now, we have had radical left-wing judges, make no mistake.
The courts have not always been right.
In fact, courts usually in American history have been wrong on things that matter.
I don't want to say more times than they've been right, but I can make plenty of examples.
The Dred Scott case was an insult to humanity.
That was seven Democrats and two Republicans on the U.S. Supreme Court that played into the dehumanization of black people.
There are many other decisions.
Jacobson v. Massachusetts, which allowed for the forced sterilization of women in the 1920s and basically laid the framework for forced vaccinations that we still have in our country.
There are many different Supreme Court cases, Roe versus Wade, that we had the Warren Court and the Burger Court, right?
One back to the one back to back of liberal court interpretations.
It wasn't until, quite honestly, the 1990s with the appointment of the great Clarence Thomas.
We're praying for Clarence Thomas, by the way, as he seems to be struggling with something health-related, but I think he's going to be okay based on all public reports.
It wasn't until the appointment of Clarence Thomas that Republicans realize, oh, we're losing our freedoms, our liberties, our sovereignty in our country because the other side, they're appointing radical left-wingers like Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who actually came after Clarence Thomas.
They're putting these people on the U.S. Supreme Court that don't share any of our values.
Now, mind you, one of the things that I want to put forward when it comes to this is that Republicans have been just as guilty at putting awful people on the U.S. Supreme Court.
Sandra Day O'Connor, not exactly someone who was a fan of the unborn.
John Roberts, as well, someone under George W. Bush.
Anthony Kennedy, who was okay on some decisions, but was also a Reagan appointee.
Now, we've had some phenomenal conservative justices over the last 20 or 30 years.
Justice Rehnquist was phenomenal.
Scalia was exceptional.
Gorsuch looks to be one of the best we've ever had.
Alito is terrific.
And the jury is still out, get it, on Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.
But this radical left turn where we don't really care if they're qualified.
We don't care whether or not they love the Constitution.
We want fundamental transformation happened more explicitly and more transparently under Barack Hussein Obama than any other president.
People forget that Obama got two Supreme Court justices very early in his presidency.
That's, of course, where we got Justice Kagan and Justice Sotomayor.
They kind of just skated right through Congress.
No one thought to ask them any serious questions.
Of course, Justice Sotomayor has been probably one of the worst justices in the history of the United States.
Her rulings are basically incoherent.
Her babblings when she asks questions, I mean, I think back to just recently, she had her statistics so wildly wrong on children dying of COVID, it made international news for days that a U.S. Supreme Court could be so woefully uninformed.
Justice Kagan is a little bit smarter than Justice Sotomayor, but not by a lot.
And so the court has basically become a partisan instrument.
But mind you, when conservatives want constitutionalists on the Supreme Court, that's not actually partisan.
That is, by definition, exactly what you should want.
You should want people on the U.S. Supreme Court that love the Constitution, that know why it's there, to protect individual liberty, to restrain government, not restrain human behavior, to believe in separation of powers, the consent of the governed, and yes, the independent judiciary.
Checks and balances is a moral good.
It comes straight from the biblical teaching that only God should be able to have the power of the executive, the legislative, and the judicial combined into one.
Here on earth, with the time we have here, no human government or individual or person should be able to have all that power.
Let's get to some sound here.
Senator Hawley has been leading the charge, exposing Judge Jackson's inexplicable soft spot for child predators and child pornographers, play cut for.
Well, the facts are the facts, and the facts are that Dick Durbin can call names and cast aspersions all he wants, but Judge Jackson sentenced below the sentencing guidelines for every single child porn offender that has come before her.
And it's not just one or two, Brian.
She's had, to the extent that we can find her cases, she's had at least 10, we believe, 10 different cases with child porn offenders.
And in every single one where she had discretion, she sentenced below what the federal recommendation was.
She sentenced below what the government recommended.
Now, listen, here's what the left's new line is: that's fine.
They said, yeah, because child porn sentences are too high.
So it's good that Judge Jackson is sentencing leniently.
And I guess we can have that debate.
I just want to say that I disagree with that.
I don't think this is the time to go soft on child porn offenses.
Yeah, I don't really think it's much of a debate.
I think Senator Hawley is doing his best, Washington, D.C. politician.
I actually think he's playing into the irony of the entire situation really effectively.
I have a lot of respect for Senator Hawley, where he's basically saying on TV, yeah, I guess we could have a debate of whether or not we should have soft spots for child pornographers.
At that moment, everyone screams their TV and says, there is no debate.
Well played, Senator Hawley.
And it's also weird that so many cases with child porn offenders are flowing through the D.C. Circuit Court, different conversation for a different time.
But how are Republicans going to now react to this person, this judge who wants to be on the U.S. Supreme Court being pushed by Biden, who has a soft spot for child pornographers, did advocacy for Gitmoter, sworn enemy against the United States, has a questionable view of the United States founding and a love of critical race theory in the 1619 project.
How are Republicans reacting to this?
Well, leave it to Lindsey Graham, everybody.
Play cut 16.
Most of us couldn't go back to our offices during Kavanaugh without getting spit on.
Hope that doesn't happen to y'all.
I don't think it will.
As to the historic nature of your appointment, I understand.
But when I get lectured about this from my Democratic colleagues, I remember Janice Rogers Brown, African-American woman.
It was filibustered by the same people praising you.
I remember, remember Miguel Estrada, one of the finest people I ever met.
Completely wiped out.
So Senator Graham is lecturing about, I don't really know what he's lecturing about, the fact that there has been other nominees that are black women, I think, for circuit court and federal court decisions.
Now, Republicans are starting to dig in a little bit.
The question is: so they're saying, look, this is political theater, but with some of the, let's say, revelations by Senator Hawley showing that Katangi Brown Jackson is an advocate, a protector of child pornographers, I think it's going to be really hard for Republicans to approve of her nomination.
This went from kind of a rubber stamp exercise to now this is becoming a little bit more contentious.
This was always going to be political theater, obviously.
But the Republicans now, it seems, have found an angle.
And even unexpectedly, the person who only fights if he thinks he can win, and we're by no means automatically against everything this person stands for, but definitely not a fan of most of his views, but he's been pretty good with judges.
You've got to give him credit.
Senator Mitch McConnell comes out and says that Katanji Brown Jackson has a special empathy for criminals.
And of course, then Whoopee Goldberg comes out and loses her mind.
That's to be expected.
But Republicans seem as if to be digging in a little bit.
Now, whether or not we can hold Susan Collins or Lisa Murkowski or all these other people remains to be seen, but Joe Manchin is going to have a little bit of a tough time.
A 50-50 Senate is not automatic at all.
Now, Mitt Romney will probably lead the charge, will carry the banner to go make sure the Republican Party votes for and endorses a judge who has been a top advocate for child pornographers.
Play Cut 17.
Republicans Face a Tough Fight 00:07:14
I also wonder, because, you know, Mitch McConnell says her supporters look at her resume and deduce a special empathy for criminals.
You know, I know you don't mean this, but that sounds like code.
She comes from a sound family.
But it doesn't matter.
Listen, she represented a lot of people.
And that's the gig when you're a federal republican.
That's what you're saying.
But you were just hitting on some of that.
It's code.
And it's cold to tell you that she may be sympathetic to black people.
They can't help.
That's all they could play is the race card immediately.
So look, here is the summary of Judge Katanji Brown Jackson.
She's a revolutionary fanatic.
She was insultingly selected for her melanin content and her chromosomes, who has a peculiar and disturbing soft spot for child sex offenders and pornographers and gitmo terrorists.
That's your one-sentence summary on Katanji Brown Jackson.
A revolutionary fanatic selected for her immutable characteristics, who has a soft spot for child pornographers and terrorists.
If you think that deserves a spot on the Supreme Court, I will just say this.
Our country deserves better.
And there are thousands of other judges who are prudent, who are moderate, who love the U.S. Constitution that do not have a long history of going to bat for people that wanted 9-11 to happen or might have involved themselves in it.
Third parties say that her advocacy for ghetto terrorists was zealous.
And despite after being a public defender, she continued to advocate for the gitmoterists when she went into private practice, going beyond just giving them a competent defense.
Washington Free Beacon, the Supreme Court frontrunner, was a zealous advocate for ghetto terror suspects.
Maybe this is what happens when you pick people based on immutable characteristics.
Maybe that's a bad idea.
Maybe instead of saying, huh, we need to just pick people based on the color of their skin or their chromosomal structure.
Why don't we pick people based on their wisdom and their experience, their decisions, and their writings?
It's like Nicole Hannah-Jones in a robe.
It's even worse than that, actually.
Republicans seem to be pushing back a little bit, which is a good thing.
But any Republican that votes for Katanji Brown Jackson is going to have an extraordinary amount of explaining to do.
Katanji Brown Jackson is pointed to be a revolutionary fanatic that will be one of the most nine, most powerful people in America.
This guy by the name of Ellie Mistahl, who went to Harvard.
It's hard to believe people go to Harvard and they end up like this.
Well, actually, it's easy to believe when you actually see what's happening at Harvard nowadays.
So he goes on MSNBC while all this is happening.
He just goes straight for it.
Instead of actually talking about the merits of how Katanji Brown Jackson has gone into great detail about how sex offenders, their rights are being stripped away, about how they need lower sentences, about how child pornographers are not pedophiles, all of these different things, not to mention the gitmo terror advocacy above and beyond just being a public defender.
He just goes straight for it.
PlayCut 18, Ellie Mistahl.
Hear it for yourself.
What would you say is the biggest challenge to Judge Jackson's confirmation, if any, given that Democrats have the majority?
The biggest challenge is her not getting up out of her chair and punching one of these fools in the mouth.
Like, that's the hardest thing.
Because all they have for her right now is racism and disgusting innuendo.
Like, they don't have anything on her record.
What Josh Hawley is doing, let's be very clear.
What Josh Hawley is doing when he tries to do this is he's trying to get her killed.
He is trying to get violence done against a Supreme Court nominee.
You hear that?
You ask questions.
You're trying to get her killed.
I mean, speaking of violence, do we remember the Kavanaugh hearings?
I lived through it.
What I mean, I lived through it.
I was there on the front lines of these, let's say, passionate people.
Is that one way to say it, Connor?
Screaming at my face.
They were trying to get me arrested.
There's a lot of the footage in the Charlie Kirk show archives that you guys might see on YouTube that has millions and millions and millions of views came during the Kavanaugh deal.
Yeah, we should post that today.
That's a good idea, Connor.
That's exactly right.
We should.
Republicans are going to dig in a little bit, which is good to see.
At first, this kind of was going to be a rubber stamp committee.
She's going to get 60 or 70 votes.
I'm not so sure that's the case anymore.
It seems that this is ramping up to be a real fight.
But again, the reason why you have a child sex offending, sympathizing, gitmoter-defending judge is because the criteria of how she was chosen was flawed from the beginning.
Clarence Thomas was not chosen because of his skin color.
Clarence Thomas was chosen because he was brilliant.
And maybe Katanji Brown Jackson is a brilliant legal mind, but we'll never actually know about that, will we?
Well, judging based on her writings, she certainly isn't.
But putting that aside, it's also bad for the recipient of the affirmative action.
Judge Katanji Brown is poised to become a member of the United States Supreme Court simply because of her melanin content and her chromosomal structure.
Being a kind of revolutionary fanatic is something that should make every U.S. Senator take pause.
And this is going to be very interesting, by the way.
This Supreme Court fight, I think, has just gone from a potential benefit for Democrats to a liability.
Raphael Warnock, who's going to be up against the great Herschel Walker in Georgia, he's going to have to explain why he voted for a judge that had a soft spot for child pedophiles.
Mark Kelly here in Arizona is going to have to explain why he voted for a judge that has a soft spot for Gitmo terrorists, Cortez Mastro in Nevada, and so on and so forth.
This went potentially, if Republicans play their cards right, to a stimulus for the Democrat cause coming into November to a massive liability.
Maybe they should have actually read her biography and did some research and not just said we are going to nominate somebody because of their sex and their race.
Thank you so much for listening, everybody.
Email us your thoughts.
It's always freedom at charliekirk.com.
Thank you so much for listening, everybody.
God bless.
For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to CharlieKirk.com.
Export Selection