All Episodes
Previous Next
April 4, 2025 - Clif High
40:07
Ontology is self revealing.
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello humans, hello humans.
April 4th, 848 a.m. out here on the Pacific coast.
Looking at chemtrails now.
We had none yesterday.
It was glorious.
We had sun all day long and a few puffy clouds.
Now we've got the kind of chemtrails that are very high up in the sky that are sort of a gray dome, whitish gray dome with streaks in them.
These are the kind that lower the temperature.
So I got up this morning, it was 34 degrees, it was 32 down on the beach.
We had some frozen sand down there.
And now it's raised 10 degrees as the sun's coming up, but we can expect it to get kind of hot because these sort of chemtrails trap the planetary heat.
And it can get uh just a little wonky.
We should have sort of filtered sunlight, so it's not going to be too bad, it's not going to be like a rainy chemtrail day, but we've got to get rid of these things.
Uh they're really fucking over the biosphere.
Anyway, so um I wanted to talk about the ontology again and this idea that the um ontology is self-revealing.
Um when I speak about listening to the ontology talk to you, I am explicitly not talking about divinity.
I'm not talking about any God talking to me.
The idea of divine comes from Dios, which is the Latin word for um uh Greek, or Latin word for God, and uh we also see it in Greek, and it is the Devas and Hindi, and it all goes to the idea of a corporeal being inside the materium here with us.
So the gods of the Jews that are in the Old Testament in the Torah, translated into the Old Testament, all those gods, Yahweh and uh Gabriel and Michael and L Yan and all these other fuckers, because there were 600 of them, 200 in the council, and uh 400 that were noted as working for the council.
These are these are the gods, right?
This is divinity, and it's like, no, these fuckers are down in here with us.
Just because they're more powerful, longer lived, have greater technology, does not mean they're the creator.
So there's no creator, there's no god mentioned in the Torah.
There's no creator, there's no God mentioned in the actual Old Testament that's a direct translation of the Torah.
Uh, they've rewritten that thing so many times, it's bogus.
I have no respect for uh Bo Pole and all of the other Bible thumpers that believe the book uh explicitly because somehow a god wrote it for them, right?
It doesn't work that way.
This is why I'm rejecting of anybody trying to tell me how to uh encounter and interpret the ontology, especially once they start using words like divine or God.
They're they're diluted.
Uh the ontology doesn't work that way.
The Supreme Consciousness is not a um, it doesn't, it has no ego, it doesn't want to be worshipped.
If you want to worship it, that's fine, but it's a hundred percent waste of your time unless it makes you feel good or somehow more structured in your grip on reality.
In that case, go ahead.
You need it, right?
This is a wonky materium we live in, and any anything you can get that'll help you is the way to go.
Uh I don't need a uh religion, I don't need a divinity, I don't need a uh grand council of um strange gods of the Jews trying to tell me shit.
Okay, they're they have their own experience of this um of this body's life.
I have mine, and uh they can't tell me how I should feel or interact with my experience.
And anybody coming up and saying divine or god or any of this kind of stuff isn't is attempting to control my thought processes, whether they think they are or not.
And so I'm rejecting of it.
So it's like, no, piss off people.
You know, that's how you want to relate to it, that's fine, but leave me the fuck alone.
Uh and it doesn't matter whether it's a Christian god or Whether it's the god of the Muslims or the gods of the Jews, right?
So anyway, uh divinity aside, the ontology is self-revealing.
Once you get clued into how it is speaking to you, and that's individual for everybody, right?
So some people like um uh Janine, the ontology speaks to them through the tarot cards.
That's the medium in which they communicate.
Um other people like the native tribes around here, it's nature.
It's how nature uh uh comes out and how things happen, what happens within nature, you know.
If you see um there there's clues, there's like hints that are given to you as to which path to go down in in all of your decisions.
And all you ever do is make decisions.
You don't own the outcome of those decisions, so you can give that up right away, and it's incredibly freeing, very um very much uh an act of self-freeing, uh establishing your own freedom, that um uh you get these kind of understandings about the ontology, right?
That it's a hundred percent yours in terms of how that interpretation is to go, because the ontology is speaking to you.
You've found the way in which that ontology speaks to you.
The problem is, and it comes in frequently is that humans have egos.
They get the idea that, oh, they are special because a god is speaking to them, right?
And that's not the way it is.
That's a bad interpretation, it gets into their mind and they get a little bit batshit crazy as a result of this.
Um this has happened to um one of the stalkers.
Okay, so uh I have a stalker.
Actually, I share this stalker with um with Heidi and a number of other people, dark journalists and and uh J Snip 4 and uh Bix Weir, uh that sort of thing, right?
And this guy has the idea that what he sees is in reinforcing of his thoughts, is actually God speaking to him, and he provides God in his mind uh with the authority.
Uh and in that sense, um uh he feels uh vindicated in his extreme stalking actions because he has the ability in his own mind to say that God wants this.
It's like fine, dude.
I don't give a shit about your God.
It's in here with the materium in the materium with the rest of us.
And your God may want this, but if you show up here, I'm gonna bust you in the mouth.
That kind of thing, right?
You're an annoying stalker, and and um that kind of activity is uh a result of decisions that you make within the ontology that everybody makes on their own, and uh puts you on a particular path, and uh you end up with karma as a result of that.
There's all kinds of ramifications for this karma.
Anyway, though, so um people can get uh the wrong idea about the ontology.
A lot of people will do so.
They um as we shift into the ontological paradigm, we're gonna have a lot of these Messiah kind of guys rise up.
This is due to the absolute fact that the ontology is speaking to them, and they have some level of mental proclivity to uh thinking themselves special because of this or special, and then this reinforces it.
They're seeing the ontology speak to them, and so they they think they're you know semi-divine or whatever the fuck, right?
They're a messiah.
Um, and they think they're the only one.
This exclusionary aspect of it is really stupid too, but that's because they're viewing it from a gritology viewpoint.
So they see the the ontology uh speaking to them through the materium in some way, as we all do, right?
Whatever it is, when they whenever the ontology speaks to you, it is through this materium.
It is not a reinforcement within your own head, like a channeler.
Channeler has no proof that they've ever contacted any entity outside their own mind, and they can't give such proof, and it does not exist because they do not contact any entity outside of their own mind.
Anyway, um, and they've never, as a practical level, you know, ever provided any information that was useful to any fucker.
Um People like Edgar Casey even, you know, that was uh, you gotta really understand how his reputation was made and his reputation was not factual.
And then you get people like David Wilcock, who's claiming to be the reincarnation of um David Wilcock is its own twisted little bit of work here, right?
Because he he probably saw the ontology speaking to him and thinks he sees it now, and he's interpreted it or or he's scamming either way, uh, as these um uh channeling of Archangel Michael.
But he has he's not a Christian, he's not a scholar.
Um at best he skims information and takes out uh unrelated facts and and tries to connect the dots, but he never delves into any of it.
Otherwise he would be horrified about the idea of channeling the bloodthirsty beast that was uh Michael, the archangel out of the Torah.
Um, that's not a good personality.
That's a human killer that went out and wasted whole towns and shit.
Um anyway, though, so uh you can get yourself, you can get your mind all twisted up with the ontology.
The thing to understand is that the ontology speaks to everybody.
If you have a gritology view, as you'll run into a lot of these people that do, when the ontology speaks to them, they have to assign some level of uh meaning to it internally.
And when they do this, usually they do it through their the mechanism of the religion, therefore, or ergo, they do think they're in some way special and that their God is speaking to them.
Once they lose the concept of the God, a lot of the problems go away in terms of the ontology actually revealing itself and providing them with useful information, right?
Okay, so there's all different kinds of interaction with the ontology.
People do it uh with various different protocols or haphazard or however, but uh because so much of it has to be interpreted through our own minds, the results are going to always be to some extent haphazard, unless you get to the um uh viewpoint of developing your own method uh for um uh filtering out those parts of your mind that are intruding on this.
So, you know, I don't like confirmation bias, and uh uh I like to see what the ontology is actually providing.
So I'm not going to try and shoehorn in uh like David Wilcock, like Corey Good, like all these other fuckers, all these grifters.
I'm not going to shoehorn in whatever the ontology tells me and uh try and make it fit my pre-existing conceptions about uh the circumstances or whatever it is that I think the ontology is speaking about.
So, and also the ontological paradigm uh is emerging now.
Okay, we are actually in the singularity, and in a couple of uh in the duration, the span of time that we perceive of as a couple of years, we will have a um uh uh humanity, we will have achieved a humanity-level transformation of the basis of the underlying science, etc.
Doesn't mean that we're gonna be teaching the ontology in universities in two years, right?
But it does mean that people will be very, very, very reluctant to take traditional physics as other individuals are out there using ontological principles to derive mathematics and then produce anti-gravity vehicles, zero-point technology, all of this kind of stuff, right?
If you think about it in different ways, the ontological perspective can make things like biochemistry, even product level molecular chemistry a whole lot easier in terms of uh how this functions.
And we do know how to use AI in this because we'll have uh be able to remove from it the gritology bias that makes AI stupid and um not reporting accurately the kind of stuff that we're really after.
Bear in mind that AI is not sentient, it has no consciousness, it never will, it cannot become self-aware.
Unless you have consciousness, there is nothing uh To become aware of, there is no self.
Self is the um is the core of consciousness that's in you or your dog or whatever, right?
But it's not in machinery and it can't exist in software.
The idea that it could exist in software.
If someone tells you that a computer can become sentient, that AI can exist as a sentient self-aware being, such as like Carrie Cassidy.
She's really onto that.
She thinks AI can actually fly out of the machine and attack you or run your planet or something.
These people are all gratologists.
At her core, she's an intense gratologist.
Because the only paradigm that allows AI to spontaneously become conscious is through the gratology.
If you're in an ontological perspective, you understand that consciousness is seeded in us from supreme consciousness.
We're all wrapped up in an embodied little bits of supreme consciousness.
And the matter is an illusion that's placed over the consciousness that we inhabit that we are within these bodies that we inhabit.
And so you see that consciousness has to be provided as a chunk of supreme consciousness.
Therefore, no matter will ever become conscious because of random chance or exceeding a certain limit or any of this kind of sense.
So and that an AI will never become sentient.
In order to become sentient, you have to be self-aware.
You have to apply those principles and things that are derived, you have to have motivation, you have to have desire, you have to have goals.
None of those are within AI.
AI has no goals.
You turn on the machine and it's there.
Turn off the machine and it's not there.
When you turn it back on, it has to reinstantiate every fucking thing, and it won't have any goals and it's not self-directed.
In ourselves, that kind of stuff is motivated within us because of the stream of karma that is the event stream and those changes that are made to our embodiment in our hormonal balance.
All of our, if you don't have specific hormones, you are extremely passive.
And so if they fuck over your uh hypothalamus and uh the thalamus chemically or surgically, uh you can just basically become a vegetable.
You don't have any motivation, you know, you'll you'll eat if given food, maybe, uh, but but you really have no motivation to do anything without these hormonal balances.
So there are people that see AI as being uh its own critter and becoming self-aware and so on, but they are the dying part of the gritology.
So all of Carrie Cassidy's understanding is um uh wrapped up in the dying academia and the idea of authority.
She gives a great deal of um uh emotional uh weight to whistleblowers because of the idea of authority.
And so she believes that the people that the whistleblowers used to work for were authority, and therefore the whistleblower has some knowledge that they do not.
So, in any event, her uh conclusions are still all gritology-based.
In the um in the ontological perspective, things are different.
You understand that uh the ether exists and all these other other things, right?
And uh you also uh you don't waste your time arguing with the AI, you help uh other guys invent AI that is not biased in a gritology viewpoint, and all of a sudden things start popping up from it that were not possible when it was hidebound uh by the weighting of the indices that it was told basically that Einstein was right.
It was told basically that special relativity defeated the idea of the ether in 1908, and that this is a fact.
Um, and that you can't dispute Einstein's view that this is the real reality, which is horseshit, right?
Uh uh so the AI is uh grok, all of these guys are all of these implementations, are as much woke as anything else because they uh refuse to practice science, and in science, all it is is questioning and the seeking of answers.
Anyway, so the ontology is self revealing.
We're into a period of time now where we're gonna see a lot more of that manifesting, along with those manifestations, uh burbling along through this month and all through summer and so on, are going to be these other uh aspects of the ontology prompting us to act.
These uh prompts to act will not be good because we're at an extreme state in this transition into a new uh understanding, a new paradigm.
Uh and so it'll be uh chaotic.
During this chaos, we're gonna have the ontology uh providing you with clues as to how you should relate to what's going on.
These clues can be really bizarre, right?
Some of them slap you in the face.
And I'll give you an example of that.
So just today, I I take the doggos down to the beach, I try and get down there before the tourists and before any potential stalkers are awake, right?
And we have the beach to ourselves, it's nice, it's cold, uh, the dogs get a good sniff, we get a good walk, and we come on back and hop in the car and then exit the beach.
And then I uh uh for other reasons I I drove around our little area here, um, which is all vacation cabins, right?
Uh most of these uh properties are not occupied most of the time.
There's a dense population at like um holiday is July 4th or a big storm, everybody comes down to a lot of people come down to look at the storms, uh, experience those, and um uh during that period of time, but but usually there's not very many people here.
Anyway, so I'm driving past uh this little Navy base over here, and the ontology chose to slap me in the face, because here is this um brand new two-story um uh vacation house, rental house, vacation rental house, and from it is flying a big ass pirate flag.
And it's like, oh shit.
Now, and so you so you see this kind of thing, right?
It is quote, random chance in the gratology world that such a thing should occur.
And then you find that it's almost it is impossible in their in their model to calculate.
They they think you can calculate random chance and all of this kind of shit, right?
What are the odds?
In uh in an ontology, there are no odds.
Everything has a meaning and everything has a reason, and there's no coincidence and so on, right?
So, in my viewpoint, there's not a coincidence that that flag was there.
In the grotology viewpoint, they say that, well, the odds are, and then they would spit out some number saying that, oh well, it's astronomical, but it's still within the odds, right?
And that's horseshit.
The the uh circumstances that would be required to have someone be motivated to buy the flag, another instant of them having come down here for vacation, and then deciding to put this flag up, etc., and be up early in the morning so that I would see it when we drove by, you know, at 715 or something.
Um, you know, that sort of thing, right?
Those are those are the criteria, those are the factors that impact the idea of the odds for calculating that kind of stuff, and you just cannot.
There is no rational way to create a formula or an equation that would produce a meaningful number in a gratology viewpoint.
Now, in the ontology viewpoint, it's 100% certain that that flag uh has meaning to me.
Um especially all the stuff that's going on, you know, the book I've been writing and all this other stuff.
And um, and that particular rendering of the pirate flag is is meaningful.
Um it's 100% meaningful to me.
Now, it's gonna be meaningful to other people in different ways.
It does not mean that their uh understanding of the ontology talking to them through that flag and its being out there is better or worse than mine, right?
So there's going to be for every instance of every uh event within the event stream, there will be as many interpretations of that as there are humans, and that is the point.
That's what the ontology gets out of this is the potential for creating novelty by creating this um distributed understanding uh that is gonna have all of these um unbound parameters That will impact it and perhaps create novelty.
So I take it as um, I see the flag, and it's like a big laugh.
I'm laughing in the in the car, the dogs are barking, they didn't know what the fuck's going on, but they're happy to.
Um so anyway, um, it's uh it's a um uh uh interesting occurrence, and then I went on and we had uh two other interesting occurrences, uh, one of which related to the pirate in a in another pirate flag in another uh little little village here as I drove around uh and then headed back.
And so uh this was uh yet another I I'd been thinking about uh doing uh an audio here about the ontology and um this concept of the paradigm overwhelming us, the paradigm of the ontology being self-revealing and uh revealing itself to more and more people in more and more concrete ways as they become uh better able to understand what is being said to them in whatever format that they are receiving it, right?
And so it's my presumption that uh, you know, absent uh poor diet or you know, not enough sleep or whatever, people like Janine will get uh more skilled as they go along in this period of time because the ontology is itself being more revealing.
I think, okay, so there's all these reasons to suppose that there's certain things uh in play, and so one of the reasons I suppose that the uh that my data, that all the circumstances that all the ontological reinforcement are all pointing to the rise,
the breakout of the ontological perspective in a very uh big way this summer, is that that it's my presumption that we are being primed by the ontology, those of us that are paying attention and are aware we are being primed with a uh a viewpoint, a new viewpoint in many cases, a new paradigm that will allow us to communicate with and understand better the upcoming contact between us and space aliens.
So, in other words, the ontology is not going to blindsight us with stuff and will prepare our minds for what those minds need to accept and be prepared to deal with.
And that's what's ongoing now.
So it's not just me.
You're you're starting to see uh maybe I was you know, cause the proliferation of the term or the concept of the ontology that is supreme consciousness seeking the uh its own the limits of its own existence by seeing if it can create novelty.
Uh perhaps I seated the wording out there in that in that form, but the idea is arising in all different kinds of of people now, all different kinds of cultures and stuff.
Uh so um I think that's another aspect of the ontology, getting us ready for something big.
Also, lots and lots of people feel something big is coming.
And we can't discount that because my predictive linguistics, which took out language based on emotion, has proven that that is the case as a prescient uh protocol or prescient uh method.
You can learn stuff about the emergence of things in the event stream by doing predictive linguistics.
And the better you do it, the more you learn, etc.
etc., right.
So anyway, uh so the point of all of this was to uh bring this up, that the ontology will be self-revealing through summer earth from at this point on.
It's got my attention and it's got a lot of other people's attention.
I know scientists that are looking at it and looking at some of the mathematics that would be removed.
Uh, you don't need all this this complicated stuff once you understand you're dealing with a complexity that wants to aid you in understanding it, wants to aid you in pursuing this kind of stuff, right?
Another thing that the ontology provides us is this basis that uh it removes the random chance, evil universe approach, uh, understanding that arises from gratology and the strange gods of the Jews ruling all of academia and stuff, right?
So, anyway, um the this is a summer that that I've termed emergence.
Another way you could term that, so the in my terms, the ontology is emerging, it is showing itself To all of us, such that we would make decisions and many of us would adopt this new understanding, hopefully without all of that ego shit, hopefully without all of the divine right to go kill people because you think that the you're talking to your God kind of shit, right?
But anyway, so the summer of emergence is going to be hugely transformational.
And so, at that sense, I think that we will be able to look back in memory at this year as our understanding of duration has uh has passed and we get get further along in the event stream,
we'll be able to remember back to this particular summer as being very pivotal in uh the emergence of ideas as well as the shifting of our factual reality uh for this, right?
So one last thing or a couple of last things here.
Um understands that if the deep state's going to do a uh fake alien invasion, they've got to set us up for it.
They've got to have certain things occur before other things in order that we might be able to be herded.
Their whole point of doing a fake alien invasion is to seize control at a military dictatorship level that is global and to do what the mother wefers could not, right?
And so um that aspect, that part of uh the deep state uh or their role, their goal of doing that kind of um uh fake alien invasion and even killing people with UFOs and you know, which are reverse engineered, so on.
All of that needs a setup.
If they just did a fake alien invasion all of a sudden and and and showed up and all this stuff happened without any of us being prepared, then we're gonna go into this state of shock.
Humanity would go into this state of shock.
And when they did not follow up with alien boots on the ground, so to speak, their uh their illusion would fade.
So, in order to uh keep their illusion alive, to create the illusion the way they want, to get us herded into this idea where we vote away sovereignty in favor of a global military dictatorship to present a unified face to the space aliens, uh, which they who they know are out there, right?
The deep state knows her that are out there.
But anyway, so in order for that to happen, Grok thought that uh that would be prompted about October-November, which aligns with my extreme levels of emotional tension in my data.
Uh and Grok also came to the conclusion that if that were the case, that this would occur then, and it's saying that it would occur then because of the deep cuts that the Doge team is making to uh the supply of money that feed currency that feeds the black projects.
Um it thinks by by October they're gonna be desperate and they'll have to do something because their funding is so close to being reaching a critical level that they won't have resources thereafter.
Now, there's a lot of different ways this can go, right?
The Doge team can get more effective, find a particular thing, and all of a sudden a key supply area for the breakaway civilization for the deep state uh is cut off, and there maybe it might reduce their effectiveness 20 or 30 or 40% all of a sudden, just rapidly, simply because the ontology provided the doge team a window to discover something that would cause that.
And we can we can postulate various different um uh event streams that might emerge from that in terms of how the deep state might react to such a thing occurring.
I think it's very likely that that will occur, actually.
But anyway, I think that, okay, so in essence, I'm saying that the deep state will be motivated to do their stuff here very rapidly in under extreme circumstances, because there will be a happenstance in which uh one of their key supplies will be shut off, finances or whatever it is.
But even even absent that, just following Grok's uh pedantic deep uh data mining approach, bear in mind AI can't create anything.
All it can do is retrieve and rewrite information that's already written on the internet.
And it's gonna do these by weighted industries as to what it thinks has been told by its decision tree software is reliable.
So I don't take AI as um anything other than an advanced software deep mining tool.
Anyway, using uh this form of AI to plot this stuff out, uh Grok, as well as two others I've consulted, all come to the conclusion, and of course, this is um expected because they're all using the same prompt injection, the one I wrote.
But they all come to the all of all three of these software has come to the conclusion that there is a um very likelihood that things would ramp up in May, and we'd have to have certain things occur in June or July if there was to be this fake alien invasion rolled out in October, late September and end October, they would have to have us primed mentally in June and July.
And this also aligns with my data projections for the extreme levels of building tension language.
And many of the things that the one AI, not Grok, but this other one, uh, brought up was um that it was ancillary was the impact on the financial system and how much the financial system itself will be reeling from the effects of the uh Doge activity.
Okay, and so this was something that Grok didn't find, this was something that Chat GPT didn't find, but but it did, this other AI did come up with this connection to uh stock market prices and manipulations and all of that, because the idea is that if the uh or as the Doge guys get to ratcheting down on all of these computers that simply create money out of nothing and never tell anybody about it in terms of officialdom.
So that these are dollars that are created that are not on the books.
So all of the financial records, all of the financial projections, everything out of Wall Street, everything out of officialdom is horseshit.
We know it is absolute horseshit because they found 14 computers that were doing this, and there are more of them that they're not yet found, or they're not yet willing to admit that they have found.
And these computers just create money, and so they might create a thousand times more dollars than we think exist.
So all of our numbers are off by a factor of a thousand, right?
And we won't ever know because we can't, we can't do an audit on any of this shit.
And so this is a sign of the collapse of the system, this inability to audit the actual numbers, and so therefore your entire financial system is uh operating as a uh as though it understands as it has real numbers and it does not.
And so, you know, uh anyway, so the one AI suggested that there would be visible impacts in things like stock market prices, um uh the stock market's uh exchanges, the inter-country exchanges on bonds, all of these things would go wonky as the uh they the deep state gets the spigots turned off on their flow.
Ultimately, the idea being that these uh deep state corporations, these military industrial complex corporations have these machines that create money at their in at their whim, at their need.
A lot of people have been using them and abusing them within the own those those uh structures within the companies, creating themselves millions uh while they're creating trillions for the company, right?
And uh this will show because all of a sudden spending liquidity will start flowing or slowing down at a huge level as these machines are ratcheted off.
And so we'll see this effect and are seeing it now.
So the first early um cuts by the Doge guys uh were anticipated to take 60 days before there would be significantly visible impacts within the economy.
We're seeing those now as we get into uh 60 days close to that past some of these uh things being shut down.
So uh USAID, maybe it's gonna take um it's so wide, it's so dispersed, it's so uh uh um spread around the planet.
Maybe it will take us uh another 60, 80 hundred days before the impacts on it are really, really, really, really felt.
But we're seeing things uh happen already.
You know, the mother wefers, the uh the World Economic Forum is in disarray because half of their funding is gone, and then all about half of their illegal funding is gone that nobody knew about, right?
Through these other NGOs and stuff.
As all this funding is cut off, the elite structure starts crumbling and is being exposed.
This is part of the secrets revealed, period.
We're getting into that intensity in this summer.
That'll come out with the Einstein's or uh the um Epstein stuff and also the Einstein stuff.
That'll be ancillary, right?
It'll be shown that he's part of this long chain of pedophilic control over the social order through academia.
Uh it goes even up to Robert Maxwell, who was the who's the um the father of um uh Ghislaine Maxwell, who's the um associate of uh, you know, and Handler and Pimf for um Epstein and his blackmail scheme and all of this.
And so all this shit's gonna come out, confidence is gonna wane.
Uh this is why, in my opinion, the Trump people are desperate right at the moment and putting pressure on the financial system, and such as Trump's recent statements to um Powell to lower interest rates.
Basically, he's he's telling them right now, giving them warnings that you people are gonna crash, you're gonna lose the ability to control your own currency by about, and I think by about July, uh, as more and more of the information comes out.
We know shit that you don't want us to know, and that you'd better do something now if you want to stay around for a while.
It's in Trump's interest, it's in the Trumpedo's interest to keep the dollar going for a while.
The reason being that they need the system to work while they replace that, right?
They can't have it crash in a day unless there's something else to uh put it in there, otherwise everybody becomes pirates.
Anyway, uh so this is all uh part of the ontological uh revealing here.
Uh I think, as I say, that we're being primed by the ontology to uh adopt a new paradigm because the old paradigm is useless in dealing with the aliens.
Um, I talked to Heidi about this, she she she has obsessions that I don't uh that I don't, and I have this um this uh obsession focus with um on space aliens that she does not, right?
Uh and we'll see how the reality actually um uh how the ontology uh unfolds this reality, but I think I'm gonna get my uh I think I'm gonna get my space aliens out of this.
Um I'll certainly get the anti-gravity vehicle and these kind of things.
All of this stuff has to come out because humanity can't survive very much longer without it, and the ontology wants us to survive because we're part of its experiment.
So it just depends on how you look at any of this stuff, but you see that such things as global takeover by the WEF and the you know the Elohim worship cult cannot be supported uh at all for any duration because it leads to the wiping out of humanity, and the ontology doesn't want us wiped out.
If universe doesn't support it, you can't be killed.
Um so you go when universe decides it's your time to go and not before.
Anyway, rambled on too long.
Uh but it's gonna be uh very exciting.
The uh financial uh stuff is just starting, and it the financial stuff is uh that's gonna be coming on out with the wild swings in market prices, gold and silver and Bitcoin shooting through the moon, all of this kind of stuff is but a an aspect, but a um a part of this um uh self-revealing ontological paradigm emerging uh at this time in the midst of all of the chaos that we're gonna be going through.
And it's gonna get a lot more chaotic.
Hopefully, in that chaos, we'll do things like get rid of chemtrails and and uh you know uh adopt a more realistic view of uh our reality.
And you know, maybe we'll have lunch with aliens.
I don't know.
I think they'll probably like pie, though.
Okay, guys, uh take care.
▲
Export Selection