Clif High - Qualia too...

April 5, 2025 - Clif High

20:09

Qualia too...

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit clifhigh.substack.com

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello humans, hello humans.
	April 5th, 813 a.m. out here on the coast.
	Pacific Ocean is reasonably flat, very calm.
	We have full moons to thank for that.
	The beach is a little bit wide because of the extra energy put into the tides.
	Yeah, we've got some chemtrails, but nothing uh too severe just yet.
	Anyway, so I wanted to talk about the ontology.
	So the way this thing works is that the ontological paradigm is self-revealing, and it will reveal itself in various different forms to individuals based on their minds and what they usually think about and stuff.
	And so I've had uh a couple of prompts from the ontology recently in the form of um uh emails, and it was just curious that email was the vehicle at this point.
	So I receive uh yesterday an email from a woman that said it basically she had um at one point uh thought that I was AI living in her phone and spying on her.
	Um and I can understand why um uh why she would say this, right?
	Uh because of the um uh the nature of her uh of her email there.
	Uh what it was was a um a situation where um hang on uh where she had um had had universe uh talking to her, where the ontology had been speaking to her, and it had chosen me to do so.
	But she saw it from an entirely different viewpoint, uh, and it made sense from her viewpoint, right?
	So her issue was that or her understanding was that the experience was uh repetitious, but basically was she would get up or walk around or however she encountered it, uh, and she'd be thinking about something.
	She'd be uh wondering about it, uh sort of you know, uh gnawing on it as I call where you um where your mind just sort of chews on it, doesn't come to a conclusion yet, there's things that are unknown, uh you don't really have a good handle on it, but you're sort of uh gnawing at the edges, trying to see what's there.
	Anyway, and so this was the process she was going through for all these various different issues, and coincidentally, and there's no coincidences in an ontological paradigm.
	Every time this happened to her, uh she would uh encounter uh or she would basically run into a new audio I had done or a new video that addressed the subject she was thinking about, right?
	And so she started to, because it happened so often, she started to form the opinion that hmm, maybe I was um, you know, maybe Cliff is AI that's connected to my phone, and my phone I know to be spying on me, right?
	It listens to you.
	Uh and so she thought, oh, maybe that was what was going on.
	Anyway, uh, so uh, but uh then I started getting into more and more of the ontology, and it started making more sense to her as to what was actually occurring was this um larger scale synchronicity uh around her thoughts, the subject of her thoughts that also was the subject of um a talk that I had done in audio or or video.
	Okay, so today I'm talking about uh the ontology, the emails that prompted this uh talk, and the and the lowest level of interaction you can have with the ontology, which is a qualia.
	Okay, so qualia comes um from that word comes the word quality.
	And uh qualia is a reductionist view of looking at your interaction with the ontology, and it provides to you a um a reduction, all right.
	So this is for like the reductionist minds.
	Uh this is the smallest level of meaning that can be transmitted consciousness to consciousness, whether or not we're talking about um uh me and in this um audio, or whether we're talking about the ontology speaking to you.
	The smallest level of thought that is cohesive and coherent and um uh basically concise, the concept is uh the is what a qualia is.
	So equalia can be actually very complex, but it is part of a complexity, and a qualia is uh for the reductionist mind, for the normies, for the gratologist.
	A qualia is the what they will seek because they want to see, they want to try and understand things from this idea of drill down to the smallest particle and then try and work your way back up.
	Complexity doesn't work that way really, but these minds will go there no matter what.
	And so they will reduce.
	When they reduce, they will ultimately come down to the idea of the individual transmission of meaning between consciousness.
	And that's what the um are instances of consciousness.
	And that's what a qualia is, right?
	It is the uh smallest level of meaning that can be transferred.
	And so sometimes you get qualia that are just multi-layered and very meaningful in many different ways.
	And uh that level of qualia uh contains within it the um instance that sparked your discovery of it, and that instance within the qualia, which is a complexity itself, even though it is a part of a larger complexity, which is the ontology in our communication with it.
	But the um the instance that sparked your understanding that this indeed was a qualia event, is that smallest level of meaning that can be transmitted.
	So even though a uh qualia is complex and can have many, many, many um uh individual instances within it of transfer of meaning, uh, there will be one that actually catches your attention, and that's the the defining qualia for that encounter with it, right?
	It gets a little complex, like I was saying.
	It's not really complicated, it's sort of simple at this level.
	And so um, so this woman has an instance where the universe is sending her the the um uh or putting her in contact with my uh speaking about a subject when she was thinking about that subject.
	And I can use drawings and show how this is an inevitable part of uh the ontology, and and it's not telepathy as we understand it, but that's a decent enough word, right?
	But it's not mind-to-mind communication at that level.
	Anyway, so uh she experiences this and starts to get a little paranoid, right?
	And I would too, I'd start freaking out, right?
	Anyway, if I thought my phone was monitoring me and then deliberately causing the reality to warp.
	Um anyway, though, so at some point she comes to understand that she's experiencing a qualia from the ontology, and the ontology is simply using uh the motivating me to speak about that, probably because there's a lot of people that are also having that same experience, and again, I can go into that later.
	Um but anyway, and so this was its way of delivering her uh the information she needed to know in response to uh the gnawing that she was doing on these subjects.
	And uh, and even though it freaked her out, she stuck with it and and you know, eventually got to the to the understanding here of aha, it's the ontology.
	So it's not Cliff, he's not an AI, he's not resonant in my phone, it's the ontology that's making these connections between us.
	Okay.
	So anyway, so she um she sends me this email.
	All right, and so here's the here's the other aspects of these.
	So the ontology was speaking to her uh through my words uh to get attention in her mind, and when she sent me that email, it was it was humorous, it was funny.
	Uh I forwarded on to Heidi because that that was a qualia from the ontology because of some of the language she used in that email, referencing this subject, that and Heidi and I had been discussing that, and Heidi had made these um the same observations in slightly different language only the day before.
	And it was unusual enough of an observation to uh warrant forwarding this on To her, right?
	That uh, oh, you know, there, so the um the nature of qualia is that there is always some other person and some other aspect uh of our reality that's also getting information out of this because our reality is very uh efficient in information transfer.
	And it, you know, it does things that can have multiplicity of effects.
	And so uh anyway, so she was the woman who sent me the email was part of the qualia, was motivated by universe to send me that email at that time, within this space of time, such that it would trigger my thought about the language that Heidi had used in reference to basically the same kind of concepts, only a day before.
	Then, okay, so that occurred yesterday, and I'm thinking about how to get this idea across and not get involved in in uh uh wander off into the weeds of the reductionist mind, because that's not the way to approach speaking with the ontology, listening and reading the ontology.
	You have to see it as a complexity.
	And so it's uh it is difficult to get this idea across because it is complex.
	So, anyway, I'm thinking about it having my coffee and this sort of thing this morning, and planning on uh the dog walk and so on, and this is I'm doing this uh audio here after the that we've come back from the beach.
	And uh anyway, so I come back over to the computer and I sit down.
	I was going to do email or something while I was uh finishing off my coffee, and that there is another email, boom, right there.
	Uh this so I hadn't not done any email yet this morning.
	The um the email from the woman was yesterday.
	And uh the first email that I got this morning, the subject was ontology.
	And uh the the punchline of the little story here is that it was an email from this guy that had listened to uh Sarah Westall's interview uh with I can't think of his name at the moment last night about the um rehypothecation of stocks and how it's all fraudulent and all of that kind of stuff.
	And the one of the the uh organizations within that um discussion of Sarah and her guest was this thing um DC DTC, uh, which is the one of the corporations, and then this guy um uh after he he said uh after he had listened to that and he goes outside, uh there is a truck with uh DTC on the side of it.
	Um and uh and you know, so that was the ontology speaking to him, and so he was he took a picture and emailed me the picture, and basically he took in a picture of a qualia.
	Now, seeing the truck with the stuff on the side, the lettering on the side, is not meaningful unless you know the rest of the story, right?
	It's just a truck with a with a logo on it.
	But um within the the um construction or within the understanding within the exploration of the ontology, it is meaningful, especially to him and also to me, and then it and then he also participated because of his email's subject line, which was just the word ontology, and I had been thinking of that as I was making that first cup of coffee this morning.
	And so this was the ontology yet again triggering me uh using specific language in order to prompt uh activity.
	Uh I was ambiguous about trying to get this idea across, right?
	That the qualia are all interrelated, it's part of a complexity.
	Uh you participate in the qualia just by discovering it.
	Uh, you participate more by telling people about it, and so on and so on, right?
	It is part of the complexity, and you can't examine these things in the reductionist uh view.
	You it for the reductionist mind, it's I can make the statement that the qualia is the smallest particle of meaning that can be transferred between two consciousness or two instances of consciousness.
	And um uh but but there's no point in reducing it because you're missing the complexity at this level, right?
	That how all the qualia are interrelated, they're all motivating, They're all different and they're all received differently and perceived differently by those who do receive and perceive them.
	And so there's not going to be all right, and then all right.
	So now qualia is not my invention.
	Qualia is something you find in ancient literature being discussed, especially Greek.
	They just wrote about it a lot.
	Okay.
	Anyway, um the idea of qualia, though, goes in all different uh cultures.
	And then it's uh uh basically a very uh ancient idea here that has been long forgotten, as we've left behind previous understandings of interaction with the ontology.
	Anyway, so I'll just uh leave it there.
	Oh, what one last thing though.
	So it's not my idea.
	I didn't discover this, I'm just um uh vocal about it.
	And we see that its discovery is continuous, uh, the ontology keeps revealing itself, and people like uh Kurt Vonnegut, the novelist, and I think the name of the novel was um Kat's Cradle.
	It's the one with Ice Nine.
	And he has this idea that there are individuals that are linked by our reality, and that this linkage is uh through what I've just described, qualia, and that there's two different types of these groups of individuals.
	And but basically he's talking about a group experience of a qualia, and that happens.
	Uh it used to be reasonably rare.
	I think it's going to be more and more uh common as we go forward because of these new energies from galactic center, yada yada yada, getting out of the Kalayuga and so on.
	In any event, that's my understanding that we will have more of these larger group qualia experiences.
	And so some people will go dumbstruck, you know, they'll think it's like the um uh you know, the Fatima stuff, right?
	The illusion of Fatima, all of that kind of stuff, these group religious experiences.
	And that's why I think we will get a religion around the ontology.
	However, um there's two different kinds of these groups.
	Those people that uh once you understand you've been in a group experience, then you have to understand how you far uh fit into that group, right?
	How much of your participation is um and awareness is uh limited or or funneled by your relationship with that group.
	Anyway, though, so Kurt Vonnegut discovered this idea and wrote about it, and he just he described these two groups as uh a kavas, which is a legitimate uh qualia coming across from universe, and then he describes the other group, and and the people within the Kavas understand that they've they're part of a group that's been um a set that has been uh uh collected by uh universe and is giving and being given instruction, so to speak.
	Then there's this other group that just think they're part of a group, and and Kurt Vonnegut said defined it as basically an illusionary one, and he called it a grand falloon, where people thought they were part of this um uh special collection of people from you know having been identified by universe and and it was all magnified and manufactured within their own minds.
	And in both of those things can exist, but uh in my point, in my way of thinking, the grand falloon is itself a bogus idea, because just the fact that these people thought they were part of this uh group, even though it was illusionary and even though they were creating through confirmation bias that those things that they used to describe and and uh uh limit the uh group,
	even though that was false, itself was a qualia, and that was a qualia to Kurt Vonnegut, and it would have been a qualia to them them, all of the people in a grand falloon had they understood the nature of the qualia and the interaction with the ontology.
	So the ontology is self-revealing, it's also uh self-correcting in that sense, right?
	If you get off on a wrong idea, this you will run into reality that will smack you down.
	You can ignore the the reality as much as you want, but you can't ignore the consequences of it.
	So I'm quite certain there will be people that will encounter, and in fact, one of our stalkers is that way, one of the stalkers that is after both myself and Heidi has This idea that his personal relationship with his God is meaningful and he is special as a result of that relationship.
	And this is a, you know, this is a dangerous premise from which to operate because it brings you into a position of denying reality.
	You're no longer searching for reality, you're trying to impose your preconception on reality.
	And then you run into the consequences of ignoring reality, which is you get a messiah complex, run into somebody that you know is gonna knock you right in your messiah mouth and down onto the pavement on your messiah ass, and they're gonna arrest you because of your uh behavior, because your mind is warped by this idea that you are somehow special.
	And so that's like an individual personal level grand falloon, right?
	You think you know the universe is talking to you, you see the ontology talking to you, and you totally misinterpret it and take it um from an ego viewpoint and end up causing people trouble, including yourself.
	So, uh so you know, qualia exists at all of these various levels, and they're part of the the process, the karma that is the engine of the event stream.
	And if you're smart and you can see this kind of stuff, then you can get yourself out of the gears of that engine, so to speak, right?
	You don't go down those paths that you uh can tell from the beginning are going to lead to basically a bad outcome because you're aware of yourself and your relationship to the event stream, and you can see this stuff unfolding around you.
	Anyway, that's the um uh the concept here today.
	I gotta go and do real work, heaving and lifting and all that kind of crud.
	So I'll let it let it go with that.
	Uh, you know, the universe talks to me all the time, it sends me these qualia in various different forms, and uh some of them are slap you in the face like these emails.
	Uh others are far more subtle.
	Uh but if you look for them, they're there all around you.
	So have a good day, guys.
	It's gonna be a stressful month as we're going to, as we're gonna discover today and and onward, and we have been discovering over these past few days.

▲