Chase Geiser and Ian Miles Cheong dissect censorship on Twitter, banking discrimination against conservative outlets like Rebel News, and the structural advantages Democrats hold in urban governance. They debate election integrity, contrasting ballot harvesting with media sensationalism, while analyzing how declining birth rates threaten societal functionality compared to moral decay. The conversation critiques modern psychiatry for medicating normal sadness, attacks gender identity theories as manipulative tools for autistic children, and exposes alleged intelligence community failures in Libya and North Korea. Ultimately, they argue that ignoring cultural shifts in media and gaming fuels progressive indoctrination, urging a return to Americanism through alternative platforms like the "Culture War Room." [Automatically generated summary]
So, you know, the funny thing is, like, I'm in digital advertising.
So I specialize in social media for my clients.
And like, the problem with these alternative platforms is that they launch and everybody joins as a protest move, but then no one ever like logs back in.
Right.
And it's because they, none of them have figured out how to get the engagement right so that you want to keep coming back.
So like when you post, you don't feel like you're posting into nowhere.
And getter has figured it out, man.
I don't know how they did it, but they figured it out.
Like, it's not like in, it's not like my Twitter following because I have 50,000 followers on Twitter, but on Getter, like when I post, they reply.
Yeah, I get the sense that people are actually seeing it.
So I think it has a standing chance.
I mean, obviously it's still subject to Apple and Google terms of service.
So it's not going to be like a perfect free speech platform.
But I don't think they're going to just, you know, knock me off for saying controversial opinions.
And I feel like honestly, I know the dude's a provocateur and I know that he ruffles feathers, but honestly, like if you look at everything that happened to him in context, he got a bad bad draw.
Like they, so like they're fine of conservative merch, right?
I mean, I guess they are.
I don't know.
I've seen other people get taken down for like some Second Amendment YouTubers told me they got taken down and they were not provided a reason as to why.
You know, PayPal just said that if you follow terms of service, you know, like they hinted at them violating it somehow.
And it was the same thing with me.
And it was very much the same way that they did it to Rebel News about a year ago when they removed Rebel News' PayPal account.
And from what I can see is that only after they started adding my byline to Rebel News, right?
Because I write there, I wasn't byline for like a while, right?
And then they added my byline to it, gave me a staff position a month after, and PayPal decides that, you know, somehow I've broken their terms of service.
And I'm talking to the guy on the phone.
He doesn't know what the hell he's talking about.
Like he's just some random guy, right?
Like a tech dude.
And I'm asking him, so what's the deal?
And then he, you know, he goes off for like 10 minutes, comes back, and he says he can't really explain it.
And I asked to speak to supervisor.
And so he's like, okay, sure, you know?
And so I talked to supervisor afterwards.
Like they call me up and the guy is like the rudest piece of garbage on the goddamn fucking planet.
You know, like he could have been nice.
He could have been nice to me.
He could have said that, you know, it's our policy that, you know, we're apologetic, but, you know, we have to suspend your account.
He could have just been a nice guy.
And I would have been like, well, okay, I don't, you know, I understand your position.
The company has certain policies that, you know, it's way above your pay grade.
I would get that.
I totally understand that.
But instead, you know, I had the feeling that he may have been one of the people to personally supervise my removal because he was a fucking bitch to me.
Like just a complete asshole.
I asked him why and he said, you know why.
What do you mean I know why?
What the hell is that?
What kind of response is that?
You know why?
I don't fucking know why.
I'm still even fucking asking you a stupid fucking question.
I mean, yeah, he might have some views, but they're not hurting anybody.
And he's helping people.
Like, you know, when the hurricanes happened, the tornadoes, not hurricanes, tornadoes in Kentucky, he was down there helping people, giving people, you know, like paying for people's houses and buying their, buying them like sleeping bags and beds and stuff to replace all the stuff they lost.
Like when I was talking to the piece of shit on the phone, I got to behave myself.
I'm getting emotional about this guy.
The dude was like, he told me, when I asked him, this is about politics, isn't it?
I confronted him and he's like, he said, well, officially, PayPal does not take a stance in politics.
We are officially neutral.
But you could sense like he was, you know, there was a smugness in the tone of his voice.
He was, you know, making funny noises.
Like, you know, like, you know, like a fucking anime character, like, you know, when he puts on his glasses and then it's like, you know, I got you there, bitch.
Yeah, it's like who the fuck does this guy think he is?
I mean, you wouldn't talk like that to someone in real life, but you know, since he's a financial officer at a company that has zero accountability to the public, I mean, I guess they can do whatever the hell they want, right?
Because I'm pretty sure I'm not the only guy he's done this to.
I'm sure he enjoys doing this.
I'm sure all of their supervisors get off on this, you know, because like jobs are pretty fucking dull, right?
I mean, isn't this what should be, I mean, people should be doing anyway?
I mean, instead of trying to cancel Joe Rogan, you know, like a friend brought up, a real good friend brought up a point.
It's like, instead of trying to cancel or censor Joe Rogan, why are we not just, you know, providing, let's say, education for misinformation or fighting back against the so-called misinformation with more accurate facts?
I mean, if they really are on the side of the truth, shouldn't they not be afraid of lies?
I mean, shouldn't they just be speaking the truth and then, you know, letting people decide for themselves what's true and what's not?
Because I mean, it's not that hard to determine if, you know, if Joe Rogan is lying about, say, Ibermecton or something, then shouldn't that be easy to prove instead of trying to censor him?
But the problem is, and I was telling him this, I was like, man, like there are really, really dumb people who are sure that the election was legitimate.
And there are really, really dumb people who are sure that it was stolen.
Yeah.
So it's very hard in the censorship climate for someone like me who doesn't care really either.
I'm going to care, but I don't, I'm not biased either way.
I don't want it to be either way.
I just want to know.
Like, it's very hard for me to figure it out, right?
Because like there's no discourse, there's no back and forth.
There's no argument at this point.
And then a counterpoint.
Like he's saying that 125,000 ballots came in and they were all for Biden, you know, right in a row at like two in the morning.
And like, I don't even know how to begin to like verify that.
But like, it seems like that number is brought up because they are watching the news and they see the number just shoot up, you know, like the numbers, the stats.
Yeah, he came out ahead of it like two nights ahead of it and he was explaining how the system works and why there's all of this misconception and how the media is not doing, you know, not explaining it well enough.
You know, whenever these jumps happen, they don't fucking explain it.
They just act all surprised.
They're like, oh my God, look at that.
Biden got 250,000 votes.
Oh, my God.
You know, they act like they're ignorant and then they wonder why their viewers are ignorant.
Well, because they're making the viewers really, really dumb.
It's not the viewers who are actually dumb, right?
It's that they're being fed ignorance by these newscasters who are more interested in sensationalizing everything when they should be informing people of what's actually happening.
They're not interested in informing people.
They just want to, you know, get those rage bait clicks.
And it's depressing because it's actually hurting democracy when they do this.
And the Republicans just didn't care enough to stop ballot harvesting, even though people on the ground were like campaigning against it.
You know, you had Scott Pressler, for example, telling everyone that we need to ban ballot harvesting because this is how the Democrats win.
They go to homeless encampments or to old folks' homes, you know, like the towers in Minnesota, right, in Minneapolis, where it's just old people living there in these elderly facilities.
They go there and they collect ballots and they get paid to do so by the Democratic Party.
Like these collectors, they get paid like $300 for every ballot they bring in.
So, you know, it's not illegal what they're doing.
It's actually perfectly legal.
It's just tedious.
So not a lot of people do it, right?
But I mean, if you could make $100 or say 300 bucks a day doing this, wouldn't you?
I mean, yeah, it's easy, right?
It's well, it's not easy, it's tedious, but they do it because it's perfectly legal to collect one ballot at a time.
And sometimes they will, you know, try to do something actually illegal and get arrested for it, like, you know, collecting 10 ballots at a time.
You're not supposed to do that.
It's only one per time.
But either way, I mean, if you're willing to pay somebody a few hundred dollars to collect a ballot, they'll do it.
Someone's going to take the job.
It's easy.
It's easier than working for Uber.
So why didn't the Republicans ban this?
You know, this was clearly an issue in Georgia, but they were letting people do it openly.
And now, you know, look at the results.
This is clearly the fault of Republicans for just not giving a shit.
And this seems to be the case all the time.
I mean, look at CRT in schools.
How did that happen?
Well, it's because Republicans were more than happy to let the schools be run by Democrats, let these school boards be taken over by Democrats and leftists.
And how is it that places like Texas are now seeing district attorneys who are source funded?
Well, it's because they just don't care about local elections.
The Republicans are fucking dumb, right?
They're fucking stupid.
Now, these American First People, the new breed of people who are more MAGA than Trump, certainly care because they're very educated.
They're young people, people our age, who give a shit about these things.
But the older people, I mean, they seem to have this idea that the system's just going to work the way it is.
I mean, you have some idiot like, I forget the guy's name.
He's a Republican senator, Ron Johnson.
Yeah, he's an idiot, right?
He went on TV today and he said that, you know, the Republican Party, and I was talking about himself, I guess, doesn't see why it is anyone's concern how to raise someone else's kids and that it's not the Republican Party's concern to ensure that every child has food and education.
Like, what the fuck are you talking about?
This is how you lose, right?
The reason so many people vote for the Democrats is because the Democrats promise to make sure that your kids are well-fed and well-educated.
That's all you need to do to get votes.
It's not hard.
And he's literally out there saying that it's not our policy to care about other people's kids.
Uh, yeah, yeah, it's nationalistic, extremely super propaganda.
It's great, it makes like good, like good propaganda or bad propaganda, yeah, good propaganda, not bad propaganda, anti-communist, you know, communism bad, uh, nationalism good.
This is what they teach in most countries.
I mean, like, go to Australia, they teach you that being Australian is good, and you know, until you get to college and then they tell you it's bad.
Singapore's the same way, China's the same way, Taiwan's the same way.
Uh, most uh, you know, Eastern European countries, Poland, Russia, uh, they all teach uh nationalism because it's good, France teaches it.
That's why France is less uh woke than America is.
You know, I mean, right now, I mean, say what you will about Macron, I think he's a piece of garbage for attacking his own citizens on the whole uh vaccine issue, but he is a nationalist, you know, he is saying the right things, at least that you know, wokeism is a disease, and and we have to teach kids to be proud of where they're born and what country they belong to and you know, who they serve, right?
Like, you can't be telling kids that America is a bad place.
I mean, if you're in America and your teachers are telling you that America is bad and you should feel bad for being born white, what the fuck are they teaching?
Um, there are still things today that I that I learned that I use, you know, from a teacher or two, right?
But the extent, the extent of the racial conversation that I had growing up in the United States in public education was just like on Black History Month or MLK Day, where we would listen to like the I Have a Dream speech and learn about the civil rights movement.
There was none of this like constant, you know, reinforcement of this is your race, this is your identity, you are privileged, you know, this is your like this.
There was no nudging, right, in terms of like identity.
The identity was supposed to be up to you, and they just had to make sure that you behaved well and like learned the lessons, you know, tolerance, you know, be nice to other people, uh, don't judge them by the color of their skin or by their gender or whatever, or what language they speak.
I mean, that's that's the idea, but now it's like, well, you got to treat those people special because they got lower IQs than you.
It's like, you know, like there's this unspoken, you know, uh, bias against black people, right?
It's like they infantilize black people and then they tell you that black people have been, you know, dissent, like, uh, uh, you know, oppressed for like centuries of millennia or like millions of years or something.
And it's like, well, that's not true.
You know, everybody's been a slave at some point, and they're not dumber than white people.
And to claim that white people are somehow just like magically superior to black people, that's fucking racist.
You know, the one where it's like racist versus woke, you know, it's like two guys sitting next to each other and they're like, oh, yeah, I believe in segregation.
It's like, yeah, me too.
You know, like, it's like they are exactly alike.
You know, they're just approaching it from different perspectives.
Because right now, I guess, you know, the people in charge are fine, but you know, give it 50 years and some wokey takes over and suddenly it's like, oh, being Chinese is bad because you have privilege and you run all the businesses.
Boohoo, you know, like that is going to be the education one day.
So I don't know what ultimately I'm just, I guess I'm just disappointed that we've allowed ourselves to get to a place where it's totally impractical for regular working class people to spend time with their kids during the day.
And so we've leaned on the public education system to look after our kids while both parents work.
Like a lot of people don't want to hear this, but it's because we let women to the workforce.
That's why.
Before.
A mom could stay at home and be a stay-at-home mom and look after her kids and raise her kids and educate her kids.
She could be her teacher to her kids.
But now we've come to this economy where men earn a lot less than they used to 50 years ago and women are forced to work in order to maintain the family because a man cannot earn enough money to support his family.
So a woman has to go to work as well.
And that leaves the kids at home alone or at school, as the case may be.
And that's the issue.
And I'm not saying that, oh, we have to go back to yesteryear and make sure women are in the kitchen and they are not allowed to work.
I think that's retarded.
That doesn't work.
That's a pipe dream that some trad type people want to fantasize about.
That's not going to happen ever.
You're going to have pushback even from conservatives about that.
But I don't know what the actual solution is.
I mean, I guess, you know, pay people better would be one solution, but I don't think that kind of works either because economics, you know?
Yeah, I think ultimately the best thing we could do would be to somehow figure out how to mitigate inflation because I think inflation really caused this ever since 71 when we went off the gold standard.
That's when you really start to see that divergence.
And I know that the women in the workforce thing really kind of started in World War II, but you really see it kick in in like the 70s, right?
And I think it has to do with that inflation.
They needed both parents working in order to make ends meet.
And ultimately, like I'm a Georgia, I'm a Petersonian of sorts.
I believe Jordan Peterson and what he talks about with the differences between genders and personality types and interests.
And I think that when there is the economic feasibility of one parent staying at home, I think that we would see a lot of women who are not at home today just decide to, right?
What if she's going to accuse someone of sexual misconduct?
Right.
And that's not an issue that I've experienced in any conservative environment, but it definitely is an issue that I've seen, maybe not firsthand, but secondhand, right?
I mean, I know people work at these, you know, liberal companies.
It's a problem for them, right?
It's a problem for them where, you know, you hire someone who's like a bit too woke, a bit too feminist and doesn't like how a certain employer or co-worker cracks a joke at them that they don't like.
They might find it offensive, go to HR and complain about it, or try to get the person fired because they want their job.
I've seen that happen.
I know a person that that happened to, he used to be a pretty big YouTuber, ran his own business website and everything.
And a woman that he had slept with had just sort of like one day randomly accused him of sexually assaulting her, even though he has all evidence proving otherwise.
And they went to court and everything and he won.
But the fact that she did that is insane, and that's a problem.
I'm trying to figure out what I should do next with this show.
I'm open to any suggestions, but I've really enjoyed having, like, frankly, the coolest part about doing this podcast is getting to meet and hang out with people like you, like people that I would normally like to follow, but then like be totally irrelevant.
So I would never get the engagement, you know?
And that was like one of the main motivators is like, all right, if I get big enough, maybe, you know, I can develop rapport with some of these people that I admire.
It's, it's, it's, uh, like, I, I, I have so much, like, even, even if your person were to use OnlyFans without all of the, you know, the connotations that it's involved in sex work and all, don't give that company money.
Like, you know, how do we like, how do we manage, you know, access to like a phone and the internet so that she's not like a fan of like well, yeah, but we don't want to make her the weird kid.
It's a historical thing, but it's the way that the Democrats cater to urban policies.
They really listen to the people there and cater to their needs.
And the people that they get living in these cities are usually transplants.
They're not people who are born in these cities.
They move there.
And so their needs tend to be quite different from people who live in, say, suburbs or rural areas, which are predominantly red.
So it's just that their needs are a bit different.
And Democrats are just better about it.
They're better about schools, for example.
They know how the system works and they know how to enforce their rule, really.
I mean, that's another thing.
They have a machine in each of these cities.
They have a machine going, you know, that determines who runs and who wins and who gets support.
And they work together with these.
Let's say, just, you know, just to set an example in school districts, for instance, many of them are run by Democrats.
And the reason why is because they know how to get things done.
If you're a Republican and you run on a policy of, say, anti-CRT, by the time you step into office, do you know what you're doing?
Do you know how to get the school funded?
Do you know that, you know, can you ensure that these schools have electricity, that there's enough school books, there's enough chairs, food, et cetera?
They don't know anything, right?
That's where they get voted out.
When a Republican steps in, they don't know what the fuck they're doing.
Whereas you get these social workers running for these positions, they are basically trained to know how the system works.
And they have friends within, you know, the contractors and all these different companies, you know, let's say food suppliers.
They're friends with them.
So they get things done very easily.
They just contract it with the school versus, you know, the contracting company and everything's hunky-dory.
Whereas you're a Republican, you're like an outsider.
Well, and the operations of government are very counterintuitive for like an entrepreneurial or conservative-minded person.
I know this from experience because my first job out of college, I was developing for my boss a smartphone application that was a carpool app, basically.
So the idea was everybody would get the app and then we would reduce congestion, traffic congestion by pairing people together who had like the same route every day, commuters, right into the city.
And I had to work with the government a lot, like go to the Metropolitan, the Metro Transit Authority meetings and try to get grants and like figure this out.
And when we ran the numbers, it was like, oh my God, the amount of money that the city is spending just on running the buses, which are very poorly occupied.
They, the, the trains, the trains there are so uh like so you have uh what's the name Pacific Union right there the train company and they're not at fault but uh their trains are being hijacked every single day there's not enough policing first of all and even when there is police there is no one you know no one is being charged for crimes because of the whole defunded police movement and uh there's no one to clean up all the garbage either so uh as a result of that trains are derailing and
stuff is getting stolen and then the whole place looks like like it's worse in a third world country where gavin newsom when he shows up and and does a photo op to clean up the place he makes a comment about how these gangs of uh you know organized uh individuals are stealing things and he even apologizes to saying the word gangs because he's uh afraid that he might offend some of his uh the people who who don't donate to him that's insane like it's so
inefficient yeah i it it's crazy everybody thinks that gavin cheated to win the recall election but what really happened is all the republicans just moved out of the state yeah pretty much a hundred thousand of them i did i was a republican that lived there and moved out a lot of leftists moved in That's a thing that people don't talk about.
But what they don't tell you is that a whole bunch of left-leaning people moved into this city or that's that's one of the things I'm totally anti-illegal immigration.
I'm pro-immigration, but anti-illegal immigration.
So don't take this the wrong way as like being apologetic or anything toward illegal immigrants.
But it doesn't really bother me that much because when the illegal immigrants flood into California, it has no impact on the Electoral College.
So it's like, all right, let's say they all vote Democrats.
Like it's not going to make a difference in a single presidential election.
The only problem is, the only problem with it is that the greater the population is in these states, the more representatives they have in Congress.
So I could see that, you know, it's highly likely that California has disproportionate, disproportionate representation in Congress due to illegal immigrants that aren't classified as illegal in the census.
They recently made it legal for undocumented migrants to vote and citizens actually, not migrants necessarily, but since the state allows illegal immigrants to get a driver's license, they are able to vote in local elections.
Trump had a pretty good idea of the whole 1776 initiative that he was launching when he was president.
And if he had, you know, stayed as president, I think we would be seeing that right now, where schools would be upturned, you know, overturned and seeing this whole process.
But right now, I mean, that's clearly not happening.
Biden's in charge and Biden's the one promoting CRT.
So, I mean, ideally, that would be the case.
But I think right now it's, and maybe this is the best outcome, right?
Maybe it's not up to the president to do these sorts of things, but it's up to the states, right?
Where Virginia and Florida are, I would say, leading the way on this when it comes to patriotic education, where both states have banned critical race theory.
They've banned any sort of education that sort of coerces students into thinking that their race is bad.
Anything that makes you like, you know, like some Democrats are posted.
They're like, oh, it's about not making white men feel bad.
Well, that's not what the law says.
The law just says that you cannot coerce someone into feeling bad about their race, right?
It could be any race.
You don't feel bad about being Asian or white or Hispanic, anything.
So I think that's a good move.
I think that Yunkin did a really brilliant thing is that he created a new position in the Florida government.
Yeah, Virginia government, where he, it's something about a DEI, you know, diversity, equity, and inclusivity.
He even calls it that.
It's like a DEI position that is basically a kind of ombudsman to ensure that no school is teaching CRT.
That's fucking smart.
And it's also he will, this, this person, you know, who has his position, as well as probably, you know, their own agency or department of their own that they run, will ensure that schools are pro-life.
That's amazing.
Like, that's how you do it.
You know, like, I'm not really, you know, on the I don't really feel strongly about either being pro-life or pro-choice, but I think that this is a great way for conservatives to fight back is we need to stop reacting to what the left does.
We need to be the ones pushing the boundaries.
We need to be the ones pushing the Overton window back to the right.
I struggle with the pro-life thing because I personally am pro-life in terms of my own conduct in my own life and how I need it to other people.
And I believe that, you know, if you believe that a fetus has human rights, then naturally it follows that it is the government's duty to protect that human being's life or rights, rather.
So I kind of lean that way, but I also respect the fact that determining whether or not you believe that a fetus is a human being is a matter of faith.
Yeah.
And I feel very uncomfortable with imposing my faith on other people.
Yeah.
And, you know, you could take that argument to the extreme and say, all right, well, you know, all of John Locke's arguments that are the foundation, the philosophical foundation of private property rights are dependent on the notion that a God created us.
You could say that if you're going to argue for private property rights, you're actually arguing for your faith to be imposed on the entire society in the same way.
And I would never ever step back from arguing in favor of private property rights.
And so, you know, there might be a little bit of an inconsistency in my thinking there, but it's a challenging issue because, like, on the one hand, it's like, I believe that's a human being and it has rights and it's terrible to murder it.
But on the other hand, it's like, but it's, but I, you have to have the humility to be like, all right, but maybe like just because I believe it's a human being doesn't mean that it actually is.
And do I have to respect that person's rights?
You're that person's right to disagree?
I don't know, man.
It's challenging.
There's just no easy answer.
If there's an easy answer, we would have solved it, I guess, right?
It's, you know, it's this idea that we won't be able to feed, you know, a million people because it's not a food.
Well, it's nonsense.
Just build more farms, you know?
So clearly, you know, the utilitarian perspective would say that, you know, from a utilitarian perspective, I would say that a pro-life argument is the more valid one because we do need to stop a human race from going extinct because we will, and we're probably already there.
If you look at China, we are on the decline.
We are on the decline.
And eventually we're going to reach a point where there's just not going to be enough manpower to keep society functioning.
And that will be a collapse point.
It literally is a collapse point.
And that when that happens, if there's not enough machines or people to operate the machines, society collapses upon itself.
And if I saw Jordan Peterson speak yesterday here in Austin, and he was talking about that.
He's like, listen, the planet can sustain at least 9 billion people.
He's like, we're totally fine.
We're going to have a shortage.
He said all the same stuff that you just said.
And ultimately, I think, if you look at the history of how nations decline, like the Roman Empire in particular, like there's a correlation between the moral decay and the actual overall decay of the society, the loss of power.
And, you know, I think that maybe the correct answer to this whole pro-life thing is just, you know, I like the utilitarian point that you were making.
Like, hey, like, we need people.
So let's just, you know, enforce that.
But I think that the most practical response is, you know, we're Americans and we just don't do that.
Like, we just don't do abortions.
Like, it's just not our culture.
We're not the type of people, regardless of whether you have the right to do it or not, we're just not the type of people who would do that.
And she did so on very racist reasons because her idea was that she didn't want black people overpopulate because she saw that as a burden, not because she hates black people.
Your kids are watching Star Wars, they're playing Call of Duty with the they them pronouns because it promotes that nowadays.
And meanwhile, you know, conservative influencers on YouTube are lying to you.
They're telling you things like, Oh, get go broke.
Those games are not selling very well.
Well, that's a fucking lie.
They're selling really, really well because, guess what?
Gamers don't care about this stuff.
Gamers just want to play video games, but slowly but surely, they are being indoctrinated into becoming progressives because nothing is stopping them, you know, from injecting this sort of stuff into video games.
So, yeah, the games are fun, they're not selling poorly, they're selling really well, and conservatives just don't give a shit.
That's the problem.
That's the issue.
We need to assert ourselves in, you know, in art.
Like, I look at the Daily Wire and I see them as getting it.
Like, they're making movies of their own.
It's fantastic.
And it was not a conservative, but you know, he's part of that, you know, that cultural push.
I don't want everybody to be Republican or conservative.
I just want people to earnestly try to discover the truth.
And that's why I love Joe Rogan.
Like, I don't, I don't, he endorsed Bernie Sanders.
I don't like Bernie Sanders for a long time.
Yeah, for a long time, he brought up universal basic income in like every episode.
There was a whole stretch where he did that.
I don't agree with universal basic income, but it doesn't bother me when Rogan says it because I know he doesn't have an agenda and he's just trying to figure this out like everybody else, right?
It didn't even phase me, man.
The problem isn't people that I disagree with.
It's fucking liars trying to exploit me.
Like, like when you have the AOCs that are taking pictures, you know, where they're posing, crying outside of a fence of like some fucking border security place, it's like, fuck you.
What the fuck is wrong with you, right?
And even Ted Cruz, right?
Like, he goes down there to visit the center so he could be photographed at the center.
And like, I get it, like, make an appearance.
It's Texas.
It's a border state.
But like, you physically being there doesn't mean shit, right?
It's like a fantasy type thing, you know, where he's like, he's, you know, like, I think he clarifies even in the article is not really talking about rape, rape, but, you know, it's like, really dude.
But yeah, there's a part of me that's like, you know, like, I almost tweeted this when I did a couple of weeks ago, something to the effect of, listen, it's okay to be a man and have emotions and be sensitive.
Like, you know, like people are getting mad at Matt Walsh because he talks about depression, right?
Like, he's like, it's not a real thing.
He's not saying it's like that people don't experience it, but it's the way that we fucking coddle these people, you know?
Like nowadays, you know, you get sad.
Let's say your fucking dog dies.
Of course, it's going to make you sad.
It's going to make you depressed.
You're going to miss your fucking dog, right?
And instead of just like dealing with your emotions, with your sadness and going through the, you know, the whole motion of like, of loss as like a normal person, now we medicate it.
We're like, oh, here's a pill to make you not feel sad about your dog, your dead dog.
And I mean, like, it, it, it, it stops you from feeling too bad, right?
That's what it does.
That's literally the only thing it does.
It's like, you know, when you're, but you're clinically depressed, it's like, you know, there is that level of depression and then there's an extra level of depression where, you know, you're having really bleak thoughts.
That's all it stops, right?
It really, it stops that, but everything else is on you.
You have to, you know, you have to exercise.
You have to improve your life.
Like it's all on you in the end to improve it.
And then when you do improve yourself, you can just get off of the thing.
You cannot use it as a crutch.
A lot of people use that for years and years and years.
And then they're curious as to why their life hasn't improved.
And when they get off of it, nothing's changed because they haven't done anything to improve themselves.
Or medicated themselves to the point where they've just like given up.
You know, it's, it's kind of like you got to think of it as a crutch, right?
When let's say you break your leg, you, you have a crutch for, say, a month and you're walking with the crutch in order to, for your leg to heal.
But by the time your leg is healed, you got to take off the crutch.
Otherwise, you're going to walk with a fucking gimp leg for the rest of your life because it's not going to heal properly.
But they don't do that.
They just stay on the crutch and, you know, for the rest of their lives, they'll be on that stupid crutch where they're so dependent on it that nothing changes.
Their leg hasn't healed.
And clearly, you know, in the case of depression, their depression hasn't healed.
It hasn't gone away because they're so dependent on this thing.
Well, the thing that really scares me about the whole, just the whole field of psychiatry is how incredibly dangerous it is to see the wrong person, see the wrong therapist, right?
And like, this is, it's a very new field.
I mean, we're talking like 100 years old, maybe 120 years old, even less like that.
I mean, we're talking about the current generation back to like Freud.
So like, this is not like a super substantiated field.
A lot of it's very theoretical.
You can't do any, you can't do any controlled studies on, you know, I'm going to treat this patient, patient this way, and then I'm going to reset that and treat that same patient a different way.
There's no, there's no way to do a control on an individual, right?
And so it just seems like the amount of harm that could be done by someone who is not knowing what they're doing and poking around in your, in your head is, is really, really a high-risk situation.
I mean, with adults, you know, we can make up our own decisions.
We can decide if the doctor's full of shit, right?
If we're smart enough.
But with kids, it's like, you know, now you have kids who are confused about who they are about their identity.
So going through puberty, they may have autism.
You know, many of them are on the autism spectrum.
And they're going to these quacks who are telling them, oh, the reason you're feeling this way is because you need to actually get your dick chopped off, you know?
And they'll say, let's see how you feel if we change your the way we refer to you.
Instead of calling you a he or a boy, how do you feel if I call you sweetie?
You know, like they'll say stuff like that.
And the kid, you know, sensing that he since a boy is getting the attention that he has always wanted, you know, decides that, oh, yeah, being a girl makes more sense to me now.
And all these doctors and these teachers are telling them that, you know, the reason they're sad is because they're not living their life properly.
They're living their life in the wrong gender.
You know, they're being misled.
It's just mind-boggling that parents just go along with it.
You know, parents trust these psychologists and these teachers who are super woke and have a political agenda to tell their kids how to, you know, how to exist, how to be.
And part of what's bizarre about it is like, you know, we're raised to respect our teachers and honor them and we're supposed to kind of hold them up.
But if you really think about it, it's not a very impressive job to be to be a grade grade level teacher.
Now, there's nothing wrong.
I'm not trying to discount anyone who's a teacher who loves it, whatever.
But the point I'm trying to make is the point that I'm trying to make is when I was growing, yeah, when I was, when I was trying, when I was growing up, I knew that one day I wanted to make as much money as possible.
That was something that was important to me.
My dad was a small business owner.
I wanted to own a business.
I do own a business.
And these teachers make $50,000 a year.
And so if I listen to everything that my teacher tells me to do, I will wind up being a teacher.
It's like, why are you relying on these people that you don't want to be like to tell you how to be?
Like, oh, we should trust the teacher because the teacher sees like a different crop of kids every year.
Like, no fucking way.
Does that teacher have any idea what the fuck they're talking about with what pronoun to use for these fucking kids that are going like all sorts of hormones?
I remember what it was like to be 13.
I remember what it was like to go through high school.
It sucked.
I was sensitive.
I was vulnerable.
I was like super into girls, but like totally afraid of rejection.
Like it's a confusing time for any young person coming of age.
You don't come into that environment and just inject, hey, maybe you wish you had tits.
So most boys are not diagnosed with gender dysphoria, right?
Like it's only adult males who are diagnosed with that.
For boys, they're diagnosed properly with autism spectrum disorder, right?
They're ASD.
They have Asperger's or whatever.
I guess they don't use the term Asperger's anymore.
It's now it's all ASD.
And it's because autism manifests itself in men and boys much differently than it does in girls, right?
In boys, they act autistic, basically, right?
They get obsessed with patterns and things like that.
Computers, you know, like autistic behavior.
You know what I'm talking about.
With girls, it's a bit different.
With girls, they are socially inept, but they don't display the social ineptitude that autistic boys do because they are naturally more socialized than men are.
Boys are, right?
Growing up, girls are raised in a slightly different environment.
They're treated slightly differently than boys are.
And that is habituation, right?
That's where acculturation comes in.
And that's, you know, the whole nurture versus nature stuff happens.
And so when psychologists or whoever, you know, observes a girl who is autistic, they may not necessarily perceive her to be autistic because she's not behaving the way that an autistic boy does.
She's behaving differently.
She, you know, expresses depression, for instance, because she can't really communicate or reach out or express herself in a way that other girls can.
She doesn't fit in.
She doesn't feel like she fits in.
And autistic kids who don't fit in will try to do anything to fit in or they will try to, especially girls mature faster than boys.
So they're naturally going to be more intelligent than boys of their age.
And so they will look for ways to fit in, to stand out.
And one of the ways that they do that to get attention is by only presenting themselves.
Yeah, or presenting themselves differently.
And that's why the psychologists will say that you're actually a boy.
They'll say you're a boy.
That's how you should get your tits chopped off.
You need to be in hormone therapy because you don't feel like a girl.
You don't feel like all the other girls who are going to sleepovers and playing with dolls.
You prefer to play with computer games.
You prefer to read books and study and you don't have any friends and you're bullied in school.
But like, he just, he was, he was, you know, he was a Democrat, but he wasn't like a leftist and he was anti-communist and he was pro-America and he was against the intelligence community's overreach and the military industrial complex.
I mean, don't get me wrong.
He didn't have a perfect presidency.
You know, the Bay of Pigs was a disaster, but Jesus, man, like, what a solid man to lead the country and bang supermodels.
And so it's like, where is that?
Like, where is like the charming, like, hey, I got shit under control?
And, you know, and Obama had a little bit of that.
Like, as much as I despise Obama, at least he evoked a sense of confidence, like reassurance.
Like, you know, like I said, I totally oppose Obama, his policies, whatever.
But when he was in the room, he gave off the feeling that everything was going to be all right.
And even when they announced the Affordable Care Act, remember when Obama announced that it passed and there was a hot mic and Joe Biden said, we fucking did it, man.
And that like totally took away from the spotlight of like the fact that they passed the ACA.
I talked to a CIA guy recently, and he was like, no, it's definitely not a CIA.
It's a State Department.
It's a clown to the State Department, you know?
The people who've been there for a while, like, you know, like all the dudes you see on TV, Net Price, Saki, you know, they're all part of this corporation.
There was no evidence of him committing any human rights violations.
And the people that they sided with, that America sided with, who gave them the guns to be able to overthrow him, are literally holding slave auctions on slave blocks, like in the fucking 1860s of Africans in Libya.
Like, that is insane.
And these are the people that America supports.
I love it when America goes on, especially the Democrats, they go on about how we need to defend our democratic allies in Ukraine.
It's like, they're not democratic.
What are you talking about?
It's a fucking corrupt government.
The government is run by a fucking petroleum company.
Well, and the reason they want to brand everybody as domestic terrorists is because if you're classified as a terrorist, you don't have the same rights as a regular citizen, right?
So all that due process shit goes away, they can put you in Guantanamo for however long without any charges or any evidence.
It's bullshit.
So it's just, they're just trying to recategorize people so they can violate their rights.
That's why, that's my theory anyway.
They can spy on your bank account, whatever.
So I don't know.
I'm really worried about the intelligence community's overreach in the United States over the course of the first half of the century.
I'm worried about the other organizations, the ones that people don't talk about, like the State Department, you know, and the Capitol Police is branching out into intelligence now.
Well, and you've got to keep in mind that, like, the CIA isn't the only part of the intelligence community.
There's the CIA, there's the NSA, which has really abused the Patriot Act, and then the FBI, which we know abused the Patriot Act in order to illegally spy on Trump, right?
Which is very scary, and they basically tried to frame him for a whole bunch of shit he didn't do so they could unseat him as president, which is literally like a sedition.
It's a coup, right?
It's not a military coup, it's a sedition, right?
And so everything that they're pissed off that we broke some windows on January 6th because FBI agents were yelling at us, telling us to do it.
Meanwhile, they're literally lying on subpoenas in secret FISA courts in order to spy on private citizens running for office in order to set them up to frame them, to unseat them once they get duly and lawfully elected.
And then they ban you from any social media after you question any election results in 2020 after four years of insisting that the election in 2016 was only due to Russian collusion.
It's total fucking horseshit.
These are the enemy of the fucking people shit.
unidentified
And when they get fired, and when they get fired, guess where they go and work?
I mean, they got everybody to wear a mask, but the EPA itself had studies saying it didn't work to the extent that it was claimed that it worked anyway.
They're still promoting it because you have newscasters on TV saying that the way that they frame these things is that they can even cast aspersions on the government itself.
The CDC could just come out and say masks don't work and they will question it on TV and insist that you keep wearing a mask and people will keep doing it.
And you can set up a chat room in your channel itself where people can chat or they can have conversations or replies to like, you know, sort of like a tweet thread, right?