Episode 5114: The Last Stand Is In Texas; Passing The SAVE Act
Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join
Aired On: 2/3/2026
Watch:
On X: @Bannons_WarRoom (https://x.com/Bannons_WarRoom)
On the Web: https://www.warroom.org
On Gettr: @WarRoom
On Podcast: Apple, iHeart Radio, Google
On TV: PlutoTV Channel 240, Dish Channel 219, Roku, Apple TV, FireTV or on https://AmericasVoice.news. #news #politics #realnews
The day after the search of the Fulton County elections facility, Tulsi Gabbard facilitated a call between the president and the FBI team working on the investigation.
That's according to three people with knowledge of that meeting.
The Times writes this.
The president addressed the agents on speakerphone, asking them questions as well as praising and thanking them for their work on the inquiry.
In a letter to lawmakers who were pressing for more details, Gabbard denied that Trump asked questions or issued directives during the call.
The paper also pointed to the unprecedented nature of the meeting.
Rather than going to senior department or FBI officials, Trump spoke directly to the frontline agents doing the granular work of a politically sensitive investigation in which he has a large personal stake.
A White House spokesperson defended President's Georgia investigation on the whole, saying he has pledged to secure America's elections.
Those 2020 elections were secure, of course, but the Justice Department, the FBI, have declined to comment.
Well, and it's worth remembering that at least in a couple of these Battleground states, the votes were run by Republicans.
Georgia was a Republican-run state.
Arizona was a Republican-run state.
And the Republican governors and secretaries of state of those states said, yeah, you lost.
And it didn't seem to stop him then.
So the idea that if Republicans run the elections somehow, there won't be fraud in his mind is belied by the fact that the Republicans didn't have fraud and did run the elections and he lost.
And look, it's really, it's an important thing what he said yesterday because he told my colleagues in the New York Times in a recent interview that he regretted not ordering the National Guard to seize voting machines in 2020 in states that he lost.
This is a proposal brought to him in the Oval Office by Mike Flynn, his former National Security Advisor and some others, saying he should effectively declare martial law in some of these states that he lost, seize the voting machines and rerun the elections until he won, basically.
And that's, you know, the fact that he says he now regrets that indicates where his head is at heading into these midterms.
In it, you write in part, quote, a president who doesn't care about the law, who commands an obedient Congress and is supported by a radicalized base of tens of millions of people who believe his lies represents a threat to the next election.
I fear that millions of citizens are still too complacent.
They aren't aware of the peril we face.
So consider this to be something like a fire drill.
It's an alarm.
One of thousands that should be ringing across the country.
MAGA's acts of aggression are already intimidating.
63 federal judges threw out 63 of Donald Trump's stupid claims that the 2020 election was stolen, including the Supreme Court, including Thomas and Alito.
All of them threw it out, said it was stupid.
You had Donald Trump's own administration and the person in charge of elections saying it was the safest, it was the fairest, cleanest election in the history of our constitutional republic.
So these aren't even good lies.
These aren't even like, like, doesn't even make us do any work.
It's right in front of our faces.
And now he's basically saying, you got Pam Bondi in Minnesota saying, yeah, we'll stop terrorizing your state if you turn over all your voting files.
That's in Minnesota.
And now in Georgia, Tulsi Gabbard?
Tulsi Gabbard is now in charge of seizing voters' files in Georgia.
That is so unconstitutional.
States run elections, not presidents who are scared their party's going to lose.
And it's not an overstatement at all to say that this looks like what autocratic regimes do.
This looks like what Orban does.
This looks like what Putin does.
This looks like what all the worst of the worst across the world do.
Yeah, Joe, one of the things about this that's so frustrating is even after January 6th, even after everything we went through at the end of 2020 and the beginning of 2021, I think there are still people who say, no, this is all bluster.
This is all talk.
This is what he does.
Yeah, what he does is he directly describes what he's going to do about elections.
What he does is he directly says what's on his mind about elections.
And I don't know why people aren't believing him.
I don't know why there isn't more of an outcry here because it's being forecast.
It's being broadcast to us.
All of the intentions right in front of our faces.
And so, you know, one of the things that we have to do in response is not just do what we're doing now, amplify and talk about what the real alarm is, but also start to think of concrete things, concrete policies that can be enacted or at least proposed to bring awareness to this and hopefully roll back some of these efforts.
But make no mistake, the intentions are very clear and right in front of our faces.
Obviously, they're totally panicked that now we're getting to the, now we're getting to the receipts of how the 2020 election was stolen.
Tulsi Gabbard, I might say the heroic Tulsi Gabbard.
Tulsi Gabbard has been right 100% of the time on all the intel.
She's given President Trump amazing intel of all these different conflicts he's trying to resolve.
And that's why they've tried to, Caroline, as you know very well, they've tried to turf her out of her job.
It's been brutal on that.
President Trump trusts her enough that she is overseeing this kind of look into the 2020 election because there are national security, obviously, and intelligence issues with this.
This is the greatest crime in the history of the country.
They stole the 2020 election.
As we have said here from the afternoon, I think it was four or five days after the 2020 election when the Associated Press called it for Joe Biden.
We said Joe Biden's illegitimate, it's an illegitimate regime, all of it.
And we stand by that.
And now we're going to get to the receipts.
And so they are absolutely freaking out.
There are a couple of bills up.
Save Act is one to make America make elections great again.
They call for a couple of basic things.
And Brad, I want you to jump in here too.
Here's what they call for.
You have to show an ID to vote, right?
A legitimate driver's license or passport.
You have to show a legitimate ID to vote.
We have to purge all the voter rolls for people who are not eligible to vote in those districts or counties or states, right?
And then we have to take, we have to do a real job on mail-in ballots, like voter, like signature verification.
We're supposed to be on the books.
But of course, they took them off the books and looked the other way in Pennsylvania.
That's how they stole that.
These are a couple of basic things.
And the Democrats are saying this is the greatest voter suppression movement in history.
Here's the reason.
Minnesota shows you this.
New York City shows you this.
If they don't have illegal aliens voting, if they don't have these phony migrants that are here on these phony programs that are at the polls, and you're damn right.
We're going to have ICE surround the polls come November.
We're not going to sit here and allow you to steal the country again.
And you can whine and cry and throw your toys out of the pram all you want, but we will never again allow an election to be stolen.
And that's why I'm so proud of what President Trump is doing and people are doing.
Caroline Wren, your thoughts on that before I go to Brad.
I think what you said about ICE is very much related to this because in fact, Senator Mark Warren said in an interview, he said, we don't want ICE agents showing up at the polling stations.
That's what this is all about.
That's why they're trying to defund ICE.
That's why they're trying to go after and target ICE and shut it down.
Why would you care if ICE shows up to polling stations?
Because illegal aliens are not allowed to vote in this country.
Except for the problem is they do.
And they do in these, they're not blue states.
I was going to say blue states.
Minnesota is a deeply red state that is held hostage by illegals voting.
And it is the minorities have taken over there.
And by minorities, I mean the minority party, the Democratic Party there.
And that is due to allowing illegals to vote.
And so that is what this outrage by the left is against ICE.
They're desperately trying to shut down the DHS funding bill.
They don't want ICE funded because they don't want ICE at the polling stations to stop illegals from voting.
The ask here on the SAVE Act and Make America, Make Elections Great Again Act are pretty basic.
A legitimate ID to show who you are to vote.
It is to clean up the voter rolls.
We've had Tom Finton on here.
There are millions, there are tens of millions of particularly in places like Georgia, but all over the nation, there are tens of millions of people on voter rolls that should not be.
They have to be cleaned up.
And the blue states are the ones that are fighting the Justice Department.
And then the last is you've got to go back to the basic law.
If you're going to have mail-in ballots, you have to have signature verification.
You have to have the double envelopes.
You have to have everything so we can't have a 2020.
And the Democrats don't want to play that because they know how to steal elections.
Let's just put you on notice again.
ICE is going to be around the polls in the 2026 midterm elections because we are never again going to allow your business model.
Because I only think, I think Jesse Kelly's right.
20% of the country probably votes for Democrats.
You know, the credentialed class.
And of course, the abject poor that they keep on these social welfare programs and never let them off it.
That's the Democratic Party based with a handful of oligarchs, the super wealthy.
That's who controls the Democratic Party.
The way that they continue to win elections is they cheat.
If they don't cheat, they can't win.
And now they're sitting there saying President Trump is a fascist.
These are very basic things.
And they're not, we're going to find out today.
Chip Roy's going to come on.
As hard as Anna Paulina Luna people have been working, I'm not so sure the SAVE Act even comes to a vote.
I'm not very hopeful that it will, which is why I think some of this is going to have to be done through executive action.
You were the president talking about nationalizing some of the elections.
Well, look, I mean, states do run elections, but you are running them contrary to federal law, which says that you cannot vote if you're an illegal alien in this country.
And so they are allowing illegal aliens to vote.
And so Donald Trump is not going to let that happen.
He's going to step in.
The federal government's going to have to step in and stop that from happening.
And so I hope that, you know, what's important about Anna Palina Luna's bill and the SAVE Act is I want that to come to a vote, especially in the Senate, because we need to see the people that are willing to put on paper vote no, basically saying that I support illegal aliens voting in the United States.
I don't know if you caught all of it, but it's the mainstream media and the left melting down because President Trump's got Tulsi Gabbard looking at the results of the stolen election in Georgia in 2020.
We're going to get to the bottom of all that.
Plus, he said yesterday, I think it was on Dan Bongino's show, he said, he answered the question, said, hey, we're going to, I may have to nationalize these elections.
Now, he wasn't using the common vernacular we use politically to say, hey, we're going to get a small set of issues and run a national campaign for the House, which we may end up doing.
I think that'll probably be it.
But he met it in the fact that if these blue, if these red states with blue cities like Minnesota and other places with these sanctuary cities continue to thwart ICE and the federal government from getting in and removing these criminal aliens and doing mass deportations, we're not prepared to allow another election to be stolen by the Democrats, particularly when they're thwarting the SAVE Act.
And what you guys are trying to lay out is, we told the audience, pretty basic.
Voter ID, right?
Number one, a voter ID, purge the rolls of anybody that's not eligible to vote, and then get some rules in there on mail-in ballots, like signature verifications, double off, the basics on mail-in ballots so they can't steal it like they did again in 22 or in 2020.
Can you walk us through where you guys actually stand with the SAVE Act?
Well, first of all, remember, let's rewind the clock for a minute, just so everybody can understand the score.
Number one, we drafted the SAVE Act in the spring of 2024 because we were concerned about the election of 2024, right?
And that it would impede the election of President Trump.
I worked with Cleta Mitchell, like you mentioned, Georgia, right?
Cleta's been in the center of this fight in Georgia from literally the day after the election in 2020.
I flew to Georgia, met with Cleta there.
Cleta and I worked to draft this bill along with Stephen Miller when he was, of course, in the outside before the administration.
And we got that drafted.
We got it introduced.
We got it passed.
And then the Senate did, in fact, call it up, but they blocked it, right?
The Democrats blocked it.
Schumer did.
Now, fast forward, that bill, the SAVE Act, was centered on citizenship, right?
It was centered on purging the roles, as you point out, of non-citizens, ensuring that you have to demonstrate your citizenship to register to vote.
Straightforward bill.
We purposely left voter ID separately because we were trying to have very discrete bullet issues.
We decided now we had the SAVE Act this Congress.
Mike Lee has it in the Senate.
I have it in the House.
We added, because President Trump agreed with us, we thought it was a good thing.
He wanted to do it, branded as the Save America Act.
We added voter ID into that.
So we have the SAVE Act already passed.
It's over in the Senate.
We now have the Save America Act introduced in both the House and the Senate that is SAVE, that is citizenship, and voter ID, a federal voter ID requirement.
So we have that introduced in both chambers.
We'd like to see that move in the Senate.
Pause for a second.
There is another bill, as you point out, the Make Elections Great Again bill, that has other features that we've also been working on.
That was introduced by the administrative committee, Chairman Brian Stile, or he might have ran it through the committee.
It might have been Mary Miller's bill, but it's a good bill.
That bill has other things in it, like you point out, about mail-in ballots and all the things we've got to address beyond just citizenship and voter ID.
Where does it stand?
I would have liked to have demanded as a part of the appropriations bills moving this week that we at least move the Save America Act and send it over to the Senate and put it on their desk and say, we've already passed it out of the House.
We have not negotiated that to this point.
Obviously, the president wants to avoid a shutdown.
We're working with the White House, but I want to see those move.
Anna was obviously down at the White House yesterday.
We've gotten general commitments out of the White House, the Senate, they won't want to move this.
But here's the sticking point: Leader Thune, he's got to have 51 Republicans sitting on the floor of the Senate to carry out what you described, what I would describe as a talking filibuster.
That is, you can't just force it to be 60 votes.
If you have 51 senators on the floor of the Senate, you can call the question.
Democrats, so long as they speak, can stop calling the question, but they have to be speaking.
We need leader Thun to force that.
We believe we should have an upfront central debate.
We ought to be all cameras on.
Remember the speaker's fight?
Everybody in America was watching what was happening when we were on the floor of the House.
We need that now for the Senate.
We stand for citizenship.
We stand for voter ID.
Democrats are standing to block it.
We think we should force that question.
And that's what we're trying to negotiate this week.
Well, you know where I would be on my own decision making.
I would be in the camp of where you guys are.
I am working with the White House and working with the team to figure out what's best.
The president wants to keep everything rolling, and I want to support the president.
But at the end of the day, we've been pushing hard over the last 48 hours to demonstrate to Speaker Johnson and leader Thune that we're serious about this and we must get this vote.
The SAVAC's over there.
We want the Save America Act over there.
We want to force the question.
I think the question here isn't about leverage, though.
The question here is how to muster 51 votes in the Senate.
That's the ultimate question.
It actually isn't 60, Steve.
And I think this is something everybody needs to understand.
The filibuster is a problem, and we need to force that because it would put pressure on senators.
We need to force the talking filibuster.
But we need 51 Republicans to stand behind something.
So this is where Scott's great work in going around and pushing hard to try to get every senator to co-sponsor the SAVAC.
We're now at a number where we're at 50.
We need to get that up.
McConnell's opposing it, of course, but we need to get that so we have 51 that are on record saying they support something because then there's no excuse not to force the talking filibuster.
It's the only way to break 60 or you have to move it on a must-pass piece of legislation.
And the only thing we have left is going to be the DHS funding bill after this week's bill, the FISA reauthorization, which you and I have problems with.
We think you need to add a warrant requirement to FISA.
And then one or two other things, the spending bill by September, and by then it's too late.
So we've got to try to force the question right now.
Let me add another number for the Warren Posse to chew on.
You got 60, which they have this kind of phony filibuster.
You got 51 that could force them to do a talking filibuster, but then you have 27.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
If Thune can't get 51 to do this, don't we go to the president and say, hey, look, let's call a vote on his leadership.
Don't we have 27 senators that would vote Thune out and get somebody into, I don't know if it's Eric Schmidt, Hawley, you picket, somebody that'd be the new leader of the Senate that would get you the 51.
I mean, they keep saying we can't get the votes.
That's what a leader is supposed to do.
If Thune cannot deliver this week on these basics about not allowing them to steal elections, why is he not removed as a leader of the Senate, sir?
Well, I think that's a great question for Mike Lee and Rick Scott.
My observation, you know, and I was obviously a chief of staff to Ted Cruz in the Senate.
I know the Senate pretty well.
The question is going to be is who can deliver 51?
And I think right now, I will say this, the president, without divulging private conversations, the president is very animated and very concerned about getting the Senate to move on this.
I think leader Thune is feeling that.
I think we're at a critical juncture right now where if the posse is engaged, if the American people are engaged and we put pressure on the Senate that we will force this question.
Now, my concern is when I hear Thune say we're going to have a vote on this soon, is it'll have a vote.
He won't force the question at 51.
We will lose the vote and it'll say, well, I tried, right?
And that's not good enough.
You've got to go down there with the full force of 51 senators and get it done.
I think if that does not happen, then I think that leader Thune's going to have some questions to have to answer.
And I think there'll be some questions about the overall leadership.
I think that Majority Leader Thun wants to try to figure out how to get this done.
At least Mike Lee thinks he believes that after his conversations with him.
So Mike's going to be in a better position to explain that.
But look, for everybody out there, we're as close as we've ever been, but we're going to run out of time.
If we don't pass these reforms in the next weeks, right, we're going to run out of time to implement them and to ensure, or at least, you know, improve the likelihood that we will not have fraud by November.
I mean, obviously, I'd like to get all the reforms, get voter ID, Save Act, citizenship, the mail-in ballot changes, limits to how long you can have early voting and the online voting and make it towards paper ballots.
These are all things everybody watching this wants, everything I want.
We're trying to get there.
Again, we've got more momentum behind Save and Save America, the citizenship and voter ID than we've ever had.
But here's what's going to blow people's heads up.
How can you be a Republican senator and how can you have taken money from this audience and have people knock on doors and canvas for you and all the hard work to make sure that you don't get a Democrat?
And then on the most fundamental basic things, we got to be supplicants.
You know, we should have three or four Democrats in this.
Last, your Sharia Free America caucus has spread beyond Texas.
On Texas, this issue is on fire.
And of course, on the 3 March primary, there's going to be Proposition 10, which prohibits Sharia law in the state of Texas.
You're also on the ballot.
You're leaving the House and running for AG.
What would you tell folks in Texas?
You know, we've shifted the flag down here.
We do Warwarm, Texas from here.
And I've never seen, I said, of all the things we've launched, pandemic, impeachment, all of it, we've never had an explosive growth like we had in Warwick, Texas, because people down here are clearly now have permission structure to talk about something they've wanted to talk about and take action on.
What is your caucus?
What is your caucus going to do, number one?
Is it spreading for more members than just Texas?
And what can the caucus do at the federal level to help the Texans?
Well, so first of all, in no particular order, number one, we've got to be a voice.
And that's what we've been doing.
Going back two years ago, I gave a speech on the House floor, which ignited some of this.
Charlie Kirk and I, our last conversation we had on, that was substantive was on this topic.
This was last summer.
We started laying out some framework of things we should do.
I introduced legislation, obviously, to take the tax benefits away from care, to go after and prevent anybody that is adherent to Sharia law from being admitted to the United States and frankly get removed if you're adherent to Sharia law.
We've got the PAWS Act, which pauses all immigration until we've sorted out the entirety of the numbers, including the Sharia issue.
What we're going to do is continue to expose and hold hearings and try to grow the numbers.
We've had an immediate good group that's formed around it.
We don't want to have people join it to get cover, but we do want to grow the numbers, right?
So we're going to, as chairman of the subcommittee on the constitution, we'll hold that hearing next week at the press conference today.
We'll be talking about a lot of these issues to expose them.
We want to basically, our first step is make sure the American people and Texans in particular aren't afraid to talk about this.
We've been trained and beat over our head to think that the First Amendment means that we have to turn over our sovereignty of our nation and walk away from our Judeo-Christian values in the name of the First Amendment.
That's not true.
You've got people here who want to Islamify our country.
They're at war with our way of life.
They want to undermine Western civilization.
They want Sharia law to apply.
And all of those things will destroy our great country and what we've done as Western civilization for the world.
So we want that message to be loud and clear.
And we want to expose the 300 miles growing in Texas, the Epic City, the Islamic Center in Houston, the Islamic Center in Austin, the Islamic Center that's sitting there on West campus at the University of Texas.
All of the things going on, like yesterday in Wiley, Texas, where they were handing out hijabs before school, all in an effort to carry out their agenda.
Those things need to be exposed, and then we lay out all of the legal ways to stop them.
Caroline, I think this is the frustration with the War Room posse.
People work like crazy.
Here we are.
Now, these bills, it's a little bit jumbled, but the bottom line is the president wants this.
The MAGA base wants this.
The Republicans want this.
And here we are now in a fight about the government and about DHS, which they've got extreme, you know, no mask body cameras, which we've given them already without a negotiation.
Your federal badge up there, all because so they can dox you.
That's what they want.
Also, no indemnity for the ICE officers.
They want a federal warrant to remove any, they want a signed judicial warrant to remove anybody from the United States.
President Trump said, President Trump now, he said yesterday there are 20 to 25 million here on Biden's watch.
I'm at the official number, I think it's 12 to 15 million, but that's a grunch.
It's going to take forever.
You know, they want no more walking patrols, right?
And I find out in an article last night that put up Bovino really fought the whole DHS apparatus and people at the White House, you know, saying, hey, we just can't go into these jails because they're not turning them over.
We need to have broader sweeps.
We need to look at mass deportations to force these authorities who refuse to work with us.
And in Minnesota, they're laughing in our face.
All that being said, we're jammed up in a huge negotiation for that.
Now we've got these issues, which we have to get sorted in a couple of weeks to make sure that they can't steal the elections.
When Maryland Senate last night votes overwhelmingly to go 8-0 in congressional districts, Spanberger, and Spanberger's running the Commonwealth of Virginia like a CAA operative, right?
She's well-trained.
She's smash mouth.
She's already 10 to 1.
So mathematically, you're going to have a tough time to even do it anyway.
But to stop the standing elections, we're at 47 or 48 votes.
You have to be a supplicant even to get to the 51 to get the standing thing.
The polling on Watley is like Watley's at 24, 26, 27, 28%.
Part of that is MAGA's not convinced he's MAGA, but more importantly, they're seeing Tillis every day and they're going, Why should I do this if Tillis is sitting there?
What's the use of having anybody in the Senate if Tillis is sitting there opposing everybody?
I agree with everything Caroline's saying, but just back to the basics.
This is the America first issue of the highest order.
President Trump ran on it.
He's president because of it.
Rachel Bovard in the Wall Street Journal today has a piece saying this is an 85% issue.
It can be transformative.
Caroline said, you know, make the senators accountable.
Chip said, turn on the cameras, shine the lights, show everybody what's going on.
I work with the Immigration Accountability Project.
Everybody, go to IAPACI.com and maybe spend some money there instead of on the candidates who have let you down for the past decade and ruined our country.
The real problem, Rachel gave us one set of numbers.
As you know, Paul Gijot is no friend of Trump or MAGA, right?
Those guys hate it.
As we talked yesterday about the Wall Street Journal overall, go back when Bovart says 85% of the people support this, specifically talk about these provisions that the American people say, yeah, we definitely should have that.
Walk us through it because her piece, and I want to thank Gijot for allowing it to be in the Wall Street Journal because it's getting a broad reading.
Well, Rachel goes through the points one by one by one, but overall, she's making the point that this will crack the ice and give the rest of the Trump agenda breathing life again into the power of the people and the conservative impulse in this country.
Right now, everyone is very frustrated for everything you're saying.
But the other point that she's raising, these are just common sense principles, which we've covered.
Illegal immigrants can't vote and on down the line.
But the other piece of evidence that's important to bring up is Senator Mike Lee, a probable Supreme Court justice in the future, is about the safest pair of hands you ever seen.
So Senator Mike Lee is on board with this legislation, the SAVE Act, and Chip Roy.
This is something we have to move on.
And so I'm all in favor of it.
And everybody needs to go out.
I'm not kidding you.
Iapaction.com, go support that group because that's the only group I know of that has a roll call vote scorecard that holds the congressmen and women accountable and it has their track record there.
And this will be a key vote.
You know, Heritage Foundation, all these groups have key votes.
This will be a key vote on just a common sense, 85% issue.
And of course, 85% of the money is opposed to this.
Well, I just think this is an incredibly dangerous vote for the elitists to ever allow to happen because it will end in one-party rule for the foreseeable future.
Because right now, the math is just not behind the Democrats.
When the new census comes out, there is no electoral path for them to win a presidential election with American citizens.
Okay, we're going to take a short commercial break.
Birch Gold, of course, gold's back up today, but hey, it is all over the map.
Make sure you understand what's going on.
It's not the price.
It's the process.
Birchgold.com promo code banned the end of the dollar empire.
We called it five years ago and she's come out and said, hey, I think we want the Chinese currency to be a competitor to the U.S. dollar as far as reserve currency.
That, ladies and gentlemen, will change your life.
Talk to Philip Patrick and the team today at Birch Gold.
I want you to explain to the audience again that this is McConnell's deal that he controls Murkowski and Collins.
They're not independent actors.
So when you see them opposing bills, it's not simply that they are essentially Democrats who are in the Senate, but they are controlled by Mitch McConnell.
President Trump won the two centerpieces of the MAGA revolution is number one, seal the border and deport all illegal aliens.
Get the sovereignty of the country back and make the citizens in charge.
And number two is election integrity.
We're not going to, and by the way, they're both inextricably linked because this is how the Red-Green Alliance has basically taken over large sections of the country and continued to control our elections and continue to control.
As you say, these are red states with massive blue cities, like Illinois and like New York, like Minnesota, right?
That you have these sanctuary cities, and this is why they keep sending them in.
And I might submit that right now in those sanctuary cities, there's been no reaching out or middle ground with Holman saying, hey, we just want access to the jails to take the criminals out and maybe even prioritize the hardest criminals in Minnesota.
And they're not doing that.
Hochole just came out last night and put out a decree.
There will be no actual, there will be no working relationship whatsoever between New York State's law enforcement and ICE.
So it couldn't be more in your face.
You cannot compromise with these people.
There's nothing to compromise about.
And that's why I say if we can't get this vote, first off, we ought to put a blowtorch to these people in the Senate.
But if you can't even get to a vote to codify this for this election, President Trump is going to have to nationalize the elections.
We're going to have to then take other measures to secure because we are not prepared.
And the war imposse and the MAGA base are not prepared to sit back and just have these elections stolen.
Dave Brett, your thoughts on this well, you brought up Virginia, the stunner proposed legislation that caught my eye more than any others.
They're going to make it illegal to count hand ballots, right?
Let me say that again.
They're going to make it illegal to count hand ballots.
That's the most safest, accountable way.
All the rest of the world does that, by the way.
Every other country except for the United States.
And so what the American people haven't been able to receive yet, because they don't want this view of their own country, is that one of the major parties is pushing that type of corruption in your face in public.
And that's the, you know, Minnesota, nice.
There's all sorts of articles on that going on.
The churches, the NGOs.
The American people, I think, are finally getting there because the Minnesota story also involved that $10 billion in corruption bleeding off, right?
And then the Ukraine war, we still don't have an audit on that.
And so when you combine the corruption with the money and the fraud and the American taxpayers paying the bill for it, that's the new piece that we may be turning the page.
But as Chip just said, turn on the lights, crank up the cameras, and let's hold everyone accountable.
Next Hour: Inflationary Work, House Budget00:02:29
They're going to use that against President Trump.
What the Democrats are going, the Democrats want to shut down the government because they think that drives the growth rate down and it thwarts President Trump's economic program.
That's one of his concerns.
That's why we're facing now these two dilemmas.
You've got all this ICE negotiation that we shouldn't give up on anything because they've just told you, Hochul's just told you, there's no compromise.
They're not going to work with you.
And if you don't get these, you don't get the codification of the election integrity issues, then you're going to have to do it yourself.
Caroline's absolutely correct.
The demographics is working against them, right?
If you have a census that doesn't count illegal aliens, which we try to get done in 2020, that it's a totally different demographic.
Plus, what the movement to Florida, the movement to Arizona, the movement to Texas, to these, and particularly these other southern states that are more MAGA, the Democrats are looking at the possibility of even with the blue wall of not winning another presidential election and having another pickup, I don't know, of 20 or 30 seats in the House, which makes it almost bulletproof for their control of the House.
Unfortunately, this is why they're making such a tough stand on this.
They understand we could put them out of business.
One new thing, we're going to start in the next hour about the color revolution.
People like in Texas 9, I don't think folks in the United States overall, and particularly the MAGA base, understand the lethality of this red-green alliance and what it means.
When you look at Mandami and the way they run DSA, Working Family Party, Democrat Socialist, these people are highly, or they're Bolsheviks, Bolsheviks and jihadists, and they are highly focused.
We're going to get into this in the second hour.
The President of Colombia is supposed to show up and meet with the President of the United States.